Apr 10, 2008 4:56pm

Clinton Expresses Frustration With the Democratic Party

Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., vented frustration that the Democratic Party has failure to come to a resolution about how to handle the convention delegations in Florida and Michigan.

"I really don’t understand why the Republican Party very clearly decided what they were going to do, and the Democratic Party can’t decide," Clinton said at an airport in Pittsburgh, going further than she has in the past in her critique.

Clinton then turned on her opponent, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., saying, "He doesn’t want the votes to count. Sen. Obama has been very very clear — do not count those votes or come up with some kind of resolution which disenfranchises people."

An exasperated Clinton burst into a fit of laughter, after being asked twice about the Colombia trade deal and a possible conflict of interest involving her differing opinion with her husband on the matter. When asked if there was a conflict of interest specifically with her husband receiving $800,000 for speaking engagements ostensibly in support of the trade deal and Clinton giving her own money to her own campaign, Clinton burst out laughing.

"And how many angels dance on the head of a pin?" she asked. "I have really nothing to– I mean, how do you answer that. I am against the Colombia free trade deal. It doesn’t matter who talks to me. It doesn’t matter any circumstances. I’ve been against it, I am against it, I will be against it."

Clinton criticized President Bush for his Iraq position, saying, "The president refuses to face the reality that we are confronted by in Iraq."

She continued, "The president is asking the American people for time and patience. The American people are saying he has had enough of both. Our troops have done all that has been asked of them and more. It’s time for the president to answer the question being asked of him in the wake of the failed objectives that were laid out to be met by the surge. What is the exit strategy in Iraq?"

When asked if she would be willing to go against advice from military commanders on the ground when she is president to follow an Iraq withdrawal plan that she has laid out as a candidate, Clinton said, "Let me just describe for you the way our system works. The policy is set by the civilian leadership. The president of the United States sets the policy. Our military, thankfully so, carries out the policy that is set. You ask the military for their best advice about how to implement the policy you have set."

Clinton was asked if she agreed with Elton John that misogyny had played a role in this campaign. Clinton said, "Look, you can’t ignore that gender and race are embodied in our two candidacies. We are who we are. And that produces reactions of all kinds from people. But at the end of the day, people have to decide who they think will be the best president."

User Comments

Somebody should call her on this Florida & Michigan matter. When she was up by 20 points she agreed to omit Fl. & Mi. The time to question the judgement of the DNC was then not now. Weren’t there votes in the general just as important then as it is now.

Posted by: Charles | April 10, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

US$ 800 000 Colombian money in Bill’s pocket for speaking for another NAFTA+, Hill is unelectable, and every day is a demonstration of that reality, she has to live with her unelectable status, pack and go back to Bosnia where the snipers are waiting for her. Nothing substantive in this speech, a typical Hillary talk. The writing is on the wall Hill. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | April 10, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

She should join the Republican party if she thinks they are so wise. What a pathetic loser she is becoming.

Posted by: Bob, DC | April 10, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

A lot of us are equally frustrated. This country needs someone who knows what they are doing, not another amateur who is afraid to make a decision because it might come back to bite him on election day. If she has the nomination “stolen” from her because of the extreme press bias this year, and the dirty tricks thrown (albeit in a very clever way), she should run as an independent. Bet the DNC know it alls would not like that!

Posted by: dwc | April 10, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

A few months ago, Hillary was adamant that Florida and Michigan election results would not count because they violated DNC rules.
Now she’s adamant the votes have to count as is.
Hillary voted for Iraq, now she’s against it.
Hillary was on the board at Walmart and was there for several meetings where Walmart execs ripped union workers. Now, she supposedly supports them. (Lots of video of Walmart exec comments while Hillary was there in 86-92).
Hillary held a pro-NAFTA meeting, but supposedly has been against it.
Bill takes money from Colombia to help fund Hillary’s presidential run, but Hillary’s against them?

Posted by: Debbie | April 10, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

You white people have already lost. Obama will win because it is time for us to rise up against those who have been holding us down for so long.
Power to Obama

Posted by: Momo | April 10, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

What are the important policy differences between Clinton and Obama?

Posted by: Just curious | April 10, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

From the beginning Hillary has said the FL and MI should count.
Hot For Hillary 2008!!!!!!

Posted by: Sammy | April 10, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Take it to the floor Hill!
Obama can’t win without MI and FL. There is no point nominating him if it can only happen without 2.3 million demcratic votes being couonted.
No Point!

Posted by: s.b. | April 10, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I feel like with the race as close as it is and nobody seeming to budge one way or another…Florida and Michigan need to be seated in some way…not necessary how the results were but…some how.
After this Democratic Party, the DNC needs to look at how insane the format or the primaries is… splitting delegates. The ONLY thing I will ever agree in regards to the Republican party is the “winner” takes the state primary format. This race was interesting, now its just getting old…every little thing is scrutinized.

Posted by: Mo-Jo | April 10, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

I’m not a Hillary fan and I don’t think MI and FL should be counted. Still, she has a point — the DNC should make a decision and stop acting impotent.
Hmmm — maybe they’re not acting.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 10, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Obama is the scariest person that has ever attempted to run for office. He has no experience, he admitted him self in 2004 that he was not experienced enough to be the President. He has only been in office for 2 years and he already has more baggage than any other candidate. Worst of all he is a racist. How did he get this far??
If he is the Dem nominee then I will be voting McCain 2008!!

Posted by: Josie | April 10, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Hillary: it’s not that the Democrats can’t decide what to do about Florida and Michigan, it’s that they DID decide and you don’t agree with the decision. Go out and win the rest, and you’ll get the nomination. Otherwise, sink peacefully into the sunset while you work to make the Democrat nominee become the next president.

Posted by: Bob A. from Buffalo | April 10, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Uh, calm down Iraq_Vet
I love Hillary to death, but I think people are criticizing her for being a hypocrite.
And if I were a Vet I would be more upset that she was lying about being under sniper fire, and then joking about it during Jay Leno. I think that what our Soldiers fight for is a very serious and heartfelt devotion to American. Not to be made as a “misspoken” joke by Clinton.

Posted by: Sally | April 10, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

s. b., You’re right! Hillary has never wavered in her stance that Florida and Michigan delegates should be seated. it’s also completely unconstitutional for the nomination to proceed without them.
As to misogyny in this campaign, the overt vitriol heaped on Hillary by the press during this presidential primary season is reprehensible.

Posted by: Emily | April 10, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

What is she talking about – the Democratic Party decided months ago what they were going to do – they were not going to count the votes in Michigan and Florida and they were not going to seat their delegations based on those votes. So, what is her gripe here!

Posted by: Paul | April 10, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Excellent points, mixed-american!

Posted by: Emily | April 10, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

The Colombia deal reminds me of the banktuptcy bill. She voted for it but was really against it.
With Colombia trade, she’s against it but really for it.

Posted by: Judy | April 10, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Hillary should be called out on her latest lies about Michigan and Florida like the way she was called out on her lies about Bosnia. She is getting a completely free ride from the press about this Michigan and Florida issue. If she can only win in states where she is the only one on the ballot she is not going to be a viable candidate for general election.

Posted by: cala | April 10, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

i share hillary’s frustration
look she does not need the money, the fame, or the headaches that will come with the job of rebuilding this country. she already has a job. her life will not be in a shambles if she loses. this leads me to believe that she must believe in her heart that she can improve our economy, end the war and bring healthcare to all. otherwise she would have thrown in the towel a long time ago. i cannot help but believe that much of this hillary bashing is first and foremost sexist in nature. the idea of a woman at the helm is just too much for white men to handle. it is time for a woman president, yes this one. my personal experience with female friends and comments regarding hillary is also revealing-some are so oppressed by men that they believe that only a man can lead, some hate their mother’s and project this ‘woman in authority issue’ onto hillary.

Posted by: sonia trevino | April 10, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

The only thing that was agreed to regarding regarding MI and FL was that no one would campaign there. The only one who did campaign in FL was Obama (with television ads that ran constantly, especially on MSNBC). Of course there has to be a way of settling this, in a way that clearly respects the will of the voters of these states.

Posted by: svsolis | April 10, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

re: my previous post; correction and my apologies ‘some white men’.

Posted by: sonia trevino | April 10, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Pelosi for queen of the United States!
Be a good democrat — vote early and vote often.

Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Calm down, people. Just wait for less than 2 weeks and we will know who is the true winner…
If Obama can win Penn, then he will be the next president no matter you like or not…
But if Obama can’t, then it just proves again he cannot win the big states, big white states…
He will be fixed into his own pattern and will lose his MO…..The chance he can convine other half of Dems and unite party will be ZERO……

Posted by: True Truth | April 10, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Can you just imagine if democracy was still in effect….Hillary would be ahead. You have to wonder why the crap with Florida and Michigan. If the tables were turned and Obama was the one wanting the votes, those delegates would count. I am glad Hillary has spoken out on this, she has a right to. Obama made a decision not to have his name on the ballot and the DNC could change their minds and just pay for the recount, but they know that this would help Hillary, why would they do that? I hope Hillary pulls out a win and Obama goes back to the Senate with his racist tail tucked between his legs.

Posted by: Kris | April 10, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Clearly, a lot of posters here are mislead on what the “pledges” regarding MI and FL were… the only commitment either candidate made was to not campaign in those states. The DNC does not govern the elections in the states and the MI and FL elections have been certified. Both candidates stated the voters should not be disenfranchised and that the nominee will ask that the delegates be seated at the convention.
The only candidate of all the candidates that violated rules was Obama by running ads in FL but one of his cronies at the DNC said he could. He chose to make a national ad buy instead of a state or regional buy which was cheaper to target SC. He clearly made a decision to try to get around the rules since that was way more expensive and a poor executive decision. His campaign encouraged voters in MI to lie or be unethical in their voting by encouraging them to vote in the republican primary. A revote would not have allowed the cheaters to vote in MI so he blocked it even after he said he would agree with whatever the DNC decided. (They authorized the revote along with the state committee and Clinton.) He even refused to put up half the cost even though Clinton agreed to do so.
I agree with her position. The constitutional rights of voters in MI and FL were violated by the DNC not treating all states fairly. (Two other states who moved their primaries up prior to Feb 5 were not punished.) The court cases regarding MI and FL are still in process. Additional ongoing cases include the Texas caucus investigations and now California investigations.
Clearly the DNC is lacking and the RNC is more competent to run elections. Of course this was engineered by the RNC to divide the party as much as possible and hope for crossover votes out of anger at the DNC. The dem voters and the stupid incompetent DNC keep falling for these RNC tactics over and over. It is no surprise most of our Presidents have been Republicans since Kennedy.
The incompetence of the DNC and its wing control are the two reasons I refuse to support/join the Democratic party. I also refuse to support/join the Republican party with all its corruption and wing control. I am a proud Independent who has always supported Democratic and Independent candidates. It will be a sad day in November if I have to vote for McCain.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 10, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Man, the Obama racists are in rare form today. It’s funny what people say behind a keyboard. Let’s look at the facts without all the distractions. All three candidates are good Americans who want the best for the country (in their view). McCain was the default candidate because all the others were truly unpalatable to the Republican establishment. He’s going to be forced to run as a classic (Bush) Republican or sacrifice the support of the republican’s most loyal and active constituency, christians. Hillary underestimated Obama and has not run a good campaign by most measures. She keeps inflicting damage on herself because of her exaggerations and Bill’s big mouth. Obama has run a very good campaign even though he has some racial baggage he’s going to have to deal with. He has out-organized Hillary and has beaten her to the punch. If not for the endearment of the Clinton name to the democratic party, this race would have been over months ago. I predict Obama v. McCain in the fall with Obama winning by about 5-10% nationally. I think the country really wants a new direction and McCain won’t push away from Bush forcefully enough becasue he’s afraid of the conservative backlash. See? That’s how you post without insulting, being conspiracy theorists or name calling. I think we should all strive to be more civil.

Posted by: Travis | April 10, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

BKMC,
Why is Hillary unelectable? Because you say so?
According to the headlines on MSNBC right now McCain has erased the 10 point national poll lead that Obama previously held. McCain has barely lifted a finger and he is already giving Obama a crushing blow.
I will totally enjoy the beating that the Obama zombies are in for should Obama prevail in the nomination. In that scenario you will be crushed like crunching cockroaches being walked on by an elephant.
========================================
Obama, stay tuned for the final episode!
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

sonio trevino, that is the last part of your losing scenario including Elton John’s message who was regurgitating the same spin, accusing people of being sexist. That is seriously a very wrong characterization of the situation. Hill the Bosnian General is nobody’s mother here. We respect women but we refuse to see sex when it comes to decide on work or leadership. She is not the best candidate for the job, that is a fair judgement. Look at her campaign and how it was mismanaged. Because of her excellent managerial skills she will not have the possibility to manage a Rhumshop in the Caribbean. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | April 10, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

DCVoter,
My apologies to you. I know you are using logic and rationale to appeal to the better senses of people. I’m not seeing much responsiveness in the better sense domain, so I know I’m taking cheap shots. Keep up the good work though, I admire your steadfastness.
=======================================
Hillary stands up for all voters!
=======================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Do your homework. The document she signed stated she wouldn’t campaign in MI and FL AND the delegates wouldn’t be seated.
This is a primary, the DNC can make what ever rules they want. The Supreme court has ruled on this.
And for those who think Bill taking $800k and agreeing to LOBBY CONGRESS on CAFTA won’t effect her decisions is highly deluded.
The Clintons are crooks, selling us ALL out.

Posted by: Len in WA | April 10, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

In Dec 2000 wasnt all the Democrats yelling COUNT THE VOTES, now 8 years later the Democratic party is disenfranchising 2.5 million voters because of RULZ.

Posted by: toby | April 10, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

i am a yellow dog democrat but this year if obama is the nominee, i vote mccain. obama frightens this white man and his ferocious wife scares the heck out of me.
mccain wins and we democrats shoot ourselves in the foot again by nominating the most difficult to elect in a national campaign: a woman and an african american.

Posted by: ron | April 10, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Travis
Maybe that’s a politically correct post but it still shows your bias. A few facts would be needed if you want to make a valid point. No assertions, please.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 10, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

svsolis, understand the facts.
Obama requested permission to run a national ad. Obama received approval to run that national ad. That ‘national’ ad was =gasp= national, so therefore it was run in every state!
Running a national ad and campaigning physically in the state….that which he pledged NOT to do in the states of MI and FL, just as hillary pledged not to do….are two entirely different things.
Obama was not permitted to campaign in MI and FL.
I say give the shrill the FL win, just because all names were on the ballot (oh yeah, that’s fair). And I say do a 50/50 split on MI (yeah, this one was fair too). Maybe they should just strip the superdelegates who may have had anything to do with this mess, and then call it a day.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Len – the pledge does not state the candidates agree to not seating the delegates… it says they agree not to campaign… I guess you ignore the truth in that both Obama and Clinton stated in 2007 that the MI and FL delegates should be seated at the convention and both would ask for it at that time. The court challenges are ongoing… the credentials committee has yet to decide and Dean has already indicated that at least FL will be seated and has reserved hotel rooms for its delegates… it is always a good idea to do your own research and filter through all the BS of blogs and the MSM.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 10, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

I’m sorry to hear you’re frightened ron, how sad.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Good for you Hillary. It is about time the Democratic Party understands that they cannot violate the rights of the Michigan and Florida voters because of the rules of the Party. Obama did campaign in FL and lost. But as we all know he does not want the Florida and Michigan votes counted because he CAN ONLY WIN BY DEFAULT. Hillary is ahead in most of the states where primaries are going to be run as well as in Puerto Rico. The Democratic Party knows that the people went out to vote and did vote. So, for real purposes, those votes need to be counted because in the real elections those people are real people that will emit real votes and if the party does not count the votes according to the voter’s wishes (versus Obama’s wishes) the Florida and Michigan voters are going to be very angry. Are any of the bloggers here supporting Obama from Michigan or Florida? If you are, you do not care to count the votes because Obama wins by not counting the votes. So do Obama care about the voters and their wishes or he only cares about his convenience?

Posted by: Definitely Common Sense | April 10, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Anyone notice that Clinton picked up three more superdelegates over the past week??

Posted by: Sparkie | April 10, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

BKMC i do not expect you to agree-but the facts are women get paid less promoted less and fundamentally are at a disadvantage not only in the workforce but in society at large. yes we do need to have that discussion-even if it makes you uncomfortable. i also noticed that in your post you use the term we instead of i -suggesting perhaps that you believe you speak for all men-thanks for making my point.

Posted by: sonia trevino | April 10, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Can she just switch parties – from Democrat to Republican – Please!

Posted by: latinovoter1 | April 10, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

WestCoastMessanger and DCVoter read my email to sonio trevino and you will understand why Hill the Bosnian General is unelectable and sure polls will say the same. By the way, McCain is also unelectable because he still does not know after 8 visits to Irak the difference between shia and sunni, Al Qaeda and Iran. Who will give the responsibility to that person to be commander in chief? Wait when Hill will decide to drop out because she cannot win then there will be a surge in the polls for Obama and a strong one which is different from McCain’s military surge in Irak. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | April 10, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

A vote for Obama is a vote for Pelosi.
Obama doesn’t have the strength or power base to exert pressure over this woman. She, for better or for worse, can think on her feet. Obama needs somebody to tell him what to think.

Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

I have a real problem with Clinton’s story about being fired upon when entering a country. She said it was a mix-up. My question is: When was she ever in a situation where bullets were flying? If there was an error and she got the time and place mixed up, then tell me when it actually DID happen. Make sure it can be verified beyond just your lapdogs, too. It is one thing to make a mis-statement, it is another to blatently lie. I think that we have seen during this campaign that she will say and do anything to win. To come out and say that she will withdraw troops from Iraq in 60 days, no matter what, is insane. She cannot know what might happen that might mean that the troops would have to stay and be withdrawn at a much slower pace. However, to try to look like the major anti-war candidate, she is willing to make these overarching statments that either she might not be able to carry out, and thus would be a liar about, or that she would be willing to carry out no matter the damage it might do to the country. She is a scary, scary woman. I am a woman and I am ready, willing and able to vote for a woman for president. However, it can’t just be a woman for a woman’s sake. It has to be someone with integrity and substance. That is certainly not Clinton.

Posted by: Saywhat? | April 10, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

LA – the MI certified election results clearly indicate Obama got no more than 40% of the vote. The undecided vote of 40% were Obama, Edwards, Biden, and Richardson supporters. Clinton is being generous by agreeing to give him 40%. Awarding him 50% is unfair to the voters and would be a fixed election result.
Clearly you are not much of an American and are being sexist with your language against Senator Clinton who is also one of the most active and respected First Lady’s in our history. She is a true humanitarian respected worldwide. Obviously, you do not recognize that but be an American and show some respect please.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 10, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Every voter has his/her own right to vote for what he/she believe in…
Passion to his/her candidate is well admired and it proves a lot of people like to involve the democracy…..
Whether obama can win the majority of American, the Penn will be a good test. If he can win, he will be next president. If he can’t, then it just proves he can’t get enough white votes to support him…
When Obama faces Reps, it will be worse because the race issue will definitely be one of dominant issues to him….Not mentioning his least experience…

Posted by: True Truth | April 10, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

How can a party that has as its name Democratic, not count the votes of all those who are members! The basic premise of a democracy is the right to vote and the right of those votes to be counted. No canidate or committee can negotiate away a basic democratic right, and if they do what person of conscience would not protest such a decesion. I know I can hear the yelling rules are rules, well I think there were rules against black men driking at the same foutain,eating at the same resturant,and going to the same schools as whites. It was the law and everything was done proper and all was legal! Well when people of conscince stood up and said that no law can deny man his fundamental right to freedom then those laws were overturned and peoples rights were restored! I don’t care if those votes help Hillary or Obama they should and must be counted who wants to be on the side of disinfranchising millions of people,and who should be elected if they do?
So just to say its right does not mean it is right! Remember the movie Cool Hand Luke? When the guard went to lock Luke up to keep him from running away to his mothers furneral, the gurard says” Luke I am just doing my job you have to appreciate that.” Luke says ” just because you say its your job don’t make it right boss”. So just because Obama and others do not want to count the votes does not make it right!

Posted by: russell | April 10, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

She is losing it.

Posted by: Bob, DC | April 10, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Nothing will happen with FL and MI until after all the other states, who followed the rules, have finished voting.

Posted by: Bob, DC | April 10, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Obama did NOT campaign in FL.
That is a lie, period. Running a national ad is not the same as campaigning in that state.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

POOR BABY<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Posted by: h | April 10, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

sonio trevino, nobody will accept that for the same job there are 2 salary scales, that is discrimination and should be dismantled and that is exactely what Obama will be doing when elected president and you know that McCain will not do it. The term “we” is used to avoid arrogance and being egocentric . Hill the Bosnian General is using the term ‘I” and our candidate Obama is using the term “we” and by the way who told you that I am a man? I am a bit surprised? Sexi or color of the skin will not do it to the presidency of the US. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | April 10, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

LA in Indiana – An ad is a campaign appeal for the individual whose ad it is. Or do you somehow think all those Obama ads in PA are not for campaign purposes?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Hillary is complaining that the Dems ‘can’t decide what to do with Mich and Fla”?
Hello………..they already DID decide what to do and that was to strip them of their delegates. That was the decision and HILLARY agreed with it!
She needs to stop trying to change things when they don’t work out the way she wants them to. The problem isn’t the Dem party; it’s her.
And if she wants to get upset she needs to get upset with how she’s mismanaged her campaign.

Posted by: korey | April 10, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

She can whine all the way back to the Senate with a scrunched up face.
She’ll be lucky to be able to hold on to her Senate seat when up for re-election.
Most intelligent, critical thinking humans don’t enjoyed being blatantly lied to. Additionally, who wants a conniving, backstabbing politician in office who can’t manage her campaign and the personnel within it?
If this is experience, then let’s stay in kindergarten.

Posted by: Common Sense | April 10, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

WCM – thanks and dont sweat it. We all fight our battles in different ways. The latest polls are projecting strong Clinton wins in PA and IN. Head to head matchups clearly show Obama losing support among likely voters in both parties… particularly among white males and now females that used to support him. Will the wins be landslides? I doubt it but even a slight loss by Clinton after being outspent 4 to 1 is a clear indication half the country still supports Clinton in the states that produce electoral wins. This is what a lot of Obama supporters dont understand. (It’s not their fault they are young and unclear how electoral races work.) Only when the voters in general of all demographics take the time to educate themselves and fight against the RNC machine will the people take this country back from the control of the right wing of the Republican Party.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 10, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

It is totally sad that hillary has turned her ‘base’ into liars. She has you spewing that crap like its truth. If she was telling the truth I know more women would be voting for her, but they’re not, because she’s a carpetbagging liar. And that is why if she does somehow become the nominee, she will lose. Two-way street guys.
Understand that over half the country does not want the clinton(s) back in the white house.
bill destroyed the integrity by playing with cigars and monica. We got stuck with bush because of it.
And now he wants to go back???
lol No.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

She should be kissing Rush Limbaugh’s feet and thank him for helping her barely scrape by in Texas and Ohio.
Otherwise, she would have been toast in Texas.

Posted by: Common Sense | April 10, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

She agree not to campaign in FL and MI. She didn’t agree to disenfranchise them.
Further, the Obama campaign opposed revote proposals that had been approved by the DNC. THAT is undemocratic and frankly, un-American.

Posted by: EP | April 10, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

c’mon dog….I thought at least YOU had some common sense.
Obama has physically spent time in PA hasn’t he. Bus Tour, townhalls, rallys….now that is campaigning. Not just running a national ad and not letting the people get to meet you face to face.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

The difference between the Clinton and Obama supporters is that Obama supporters are always acting like they are entitled to this nomination, for one reason or another. This arrogance will damn his campaign if he ends up running against McCain.

Posted by: Mary Lou | April 10, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Is there anything or anyone that Hillary won’t criticize? So far she has criticized:
Obama
Bush
McCain
Democratic Party
Republican Party
The Media
The Voters
DNC
Caucuses
and the list goes on…
I’ve never seen anyone so negative about anything and everything. Is everything Hillary encounters in life so deserving of attack? I wish she had a rational side that would allow her to judiciously open her mouth without spewing hate and criticism. The negativity defines her. When she loses a state primary, she doesn’t even thank the state’s voters during her stump speech elsewhere that night. Those folks worked hard for her, and then she acts like the primary never happened, or they are a small state, so what? It’s pathetic!

Posted by: rco | April 10, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Look at what the experience Hillary claims has gotten her into:
Blatant lies
Mismanagement of campaign funds
8 Campaign slogans
Stories she repeats without confirmation
Lots of Duncan Donuts
She couldn’t be president of the local PTA, let alone President of the United States.
She needs another 35 years of “experience” to confirm it as real experience.

Posted by: Common Sense | April 10, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I’ve noticed on several occasions that Senator Clinton bursts into laughter when confronted with a question she doesn’t want to answer. She did it twice in this interview over the Columbia trade deal. Imagine her doing that when sitting across the table from a foreign head of state.

Posted by: chicagobama | April 10, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Hillary is trying to Change Today’s Conversation with last month’s News. Of course the subject remains the same “Lies”. Michigan and Florida should be stripped of their delegates and now they shouldn’t. This fits right in with the rash of current Lies we have had to endure from her. I guess this rehash of an old Lie is Miss Remembering a Miss Spoken Miss Step.

Posted by: Fareed | April 10, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

But Obama has come up with a resolution for those votes but unless they favor Clinton she won’t agree..yada yada yada agian we have to listen to this twisting of the truth.
She diesnfranchises those voters then demands they count then demands they count for her or not at all…anyone see a pattern here that would get a normal person locked up for being crazy?
As for Columbioa and the 800 thousand? IF she means it then let her give that money to a charity…..won’t happen but hey, her supporters will ignore these facts while they take this country further into debt and disgrace the world over. Hillary is a laughing stock everywhere but here to the women who see their own failures in her actions of clawing their way out of their own mess.

Posted by: Brian | April 10, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

LA in Indiana – So you are awake? Aren’t you supposed to be out there defending my butt or something? Instead you’re lying around in bed beating on the Hillary heroes! For shame! For shame!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

West Coast Mess and DC Voter are certainly showing their true colors today!!! Misstatements and lies are all you have left.
Hillary Clinton will have to win HUGE in PA and Indiana, and keep other races close to even have a prayer of stealing the election.
She’ll have to win HUGE in all or most of ALL the remaining contests to be able to have a legitimate shot at the nomination.
Neither scenario is likely at this point.
Well, West Coast Mess, at least we’ll know what side you’re on — even if McCain doesn’t have a chance in hell!!!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 10, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Right now, I would vote for Obama–yes, that is right dogsoldier–I said Obama. I don’t believe that the Pope told JFK how to run the country and I don’t believe that Obama is a terrorist in disguise. However, I do think that the tactic used by those who are like you, dogsoldier, does shame our country. If anyone is going to bring our country to ruins, to destroy what we actually have striven to stand for for over 200 years, it is people like you. I wonder every time I see a posting like yours if you are actually someone who hates America, over in Iraq or Colombia or China or even here in the US, and by preying on our weakness and prejudices you are trying to pull us down to your level. You are not what America is about. You are what we need to move beyond.

Posted by: Saywhat? | April 10, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

DCVoter – Well, they are on Obama juice so its hard for them to realize the world extends beyond their dormrooms.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Remember fellow posters……
Dogsoldier is an avid pessimist. He knows no hope and prefers to be in the abyss of doom.
West Coast Whatever is on the same team and both are like vultures flying over looking for something to land on and stick those ugly bald heads into.
They’re posts are quite entertaining. Just remember that. No serious posts.

Posted by: Common Sense | April 10, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Saywhat? – So, where is beyond? Please describe.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

“…she should run as an independent. Bet the DNC know it alls would not like that!”
Great idea; it will just make it easier for Obama to win. Obama will keep his base. She will keep her base. McCain will keep the Bush 30 percent. The bulk of the rest can be moved by Obama with his excellent political skills and grassroots campaigning. I hope so, please do it Hillary!!!

Posted by: Sidmore | April 10, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Obama won 12 states in a row, (where they BOTH campaigned) and I know that is eating you hillary supporters alive.
She is the establishment machine, yet she is behind, and you attempt to belittle Obama’s campaign???
ctfu y’all need help!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

PLEASE RUN AS AN INDEPENDENT HILLARY!
So you can place last among 3.

Posted by: Common Sense | April 10, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

La in Indiana: If the Democratic party is through with counting peoples votes then I am through with them! You know for a fact if Obama wated those votes to count Jesse Jackson would be down in Fl. taking to the streets, demanding that they be counted! Instead he and Al Sharpton have been down there doing everything they can to deny them! I may have fell off the turnip truck, but I did not fall off it yesterday!

Posted by: russell | April 10, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

sure enough dog
that’s life!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

It is so ironic that Obama supporters claim to be so smart and when they run out of ideas they resort to calling people names like childern in a school yard! So much for that myth!

Posted by: russell | April 10, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

My goodness what a whiner! I sure hope she doesn’t do another teary-eyed thing, that was so over the top…but she did try to pinch a tear for the camers during the Martin Luther Kind speech. The Clintons are liars, cheats, and biggots.

Posted by: would like some whine with your cheese | April 10, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

dos ayone know why she still has Harold Ickes as her senior advisor when he VOTED to strip Fla. and Mich. of their delegates?
I could not comprehend why she has him on her team? She is the first one screaming they should count. I woud be firing his can.

Posted by: lauren | April 10, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Hillary along with the other candidates agreed that MI and FL wouldn’t count for not following the rules.
Now she is manipulating the situation for all she is worth to see how she can twist it to her favor. I wish the DNC would come up with something so we can quit hearing Hillary say she is fighting to the death. She only cares because she believes it might help her.
Counting MI when Obama wasn’t even on the ballot would be the height of cheating.

Posted by: citizenvoter | April 10, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Obama is the establishment machine with Kennedy, Kerry and a bunch of presidential candidate loosers behind him.
He now has Oprah’s money to buy him the Presidency.

Posted by: starbucks2 | April 10, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

In the meantime, Obama has fallen from a 10% lead over McCain to an even tie. Hillary now trails McCain by 3 points.
According to polls, 1/3 of Hillary supporters would defect if she looses. 1/4 of Obama’s supporters would defect if he looses. Should these estimates turn out to be only 1/10 accurate, the results would almost guarantee McCain a healthy victory.
Stop the emotion and do the math.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 10, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Amazing!
I will be glad when this crap is over. The democratic party needs to get their act together.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I wonder if she did this when it came to a vote to allow the Unions in Walmart?

Posted by: lauren | April 10, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

No starbucks2 he has our “we the people” money to win this campaign. He is the underdog and has always been the underdog. Some of his supporters are old, but that doesn’t make him the establishment. That just means some old folks wanna see change too.
How can you call him the establishment candidate when he’s running against an ex presidents wife??

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Hillary is upset that the Democrats have not come to a resolution about how to handle the convention delegations in Florida and Michigan? The only reason there is no “resolution” is because she is trying to change the rules. The Democrats came to a resolution in the Summer of 2007 which she agreed with. She’s starting an argument then complaning that people are arguing. It’s her fault. How can she complain?

Posted by: Camden | April 10, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

OK, Senator, why is it so hard for you to understand the situation in Michigan and Florida? All of the candidates were told early on that Michigan and Florida would not count. ALL OF THE CANDIDATES AGREED THAT MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA WOULD NOT COUNT (SENATOR CLINTON INCLUDED) as a result, NO CANDIDATE CAMPAIGNED in those states (Obama’s name was not on MI’s ballot!!!). How would any of youy Clinton supporters feel if your opponent tried to change the rules of a game you were playing to benefit them. Make no mistake about it. Clinton only wants the votes to count NOW because she was losing!!!! If she felt that passionately about those voters, she would have said something at first. PERIOD.

Posted by: Democrats United | April 10, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Citizenvoter
The real Question should be why did her senior advisor Harold Ickes VOTE to strip the delegates fromFla. and Mich?
or
Why does she keep him on her Payroll?

Posted by: lauren | April 10, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Why are the American people so stupid??
The same media who helped elect Bush twice and the American people voted for him twice are now supporting Obama and against Clinton. These same media corporations are owned by the very wealthies and are trying to influence the election.
Why are the American people so stupid??

Posted by: starbucks1 | April 10, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? – I work the night shift. I support Hillary. The democratic party will never be the same and perhaps that’s a good thing. Currently, the far, far left and the far left have control. Center or center small right democrats like me are not so welcome in this party. And I suspect in time we will separate from the left forever. Perhaps we should have done so a long time ago.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

What Happened to the Real Democratic Party: It appears that it has been hyjacked by the far left, and the neoliberals who do not have to work for a living,they stay in their ivory towers and tell us everything that is wrong with america. They think that the sun is setting and not rising,that america is not loved by terrorist nations therefore their is something wrong that they using all the instruments of government can make things better. They will not be happy until all of us are eating at the Public Trough!

Posted by: russell | April 10, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

I love the way democrats attack each other armed with nothing except assertions and untruths. Like opposing jackals driven by hunger, they kill and eat their own.

Posted by: Aston | April 10, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Why is Harold Ickes Still Hillary’s senior Advisor? After he VOTED to strip the Fla. and Mich. voters of their delegates?
I thought she screams they should count?
I wonder if they know it was HER senior advisor Harold Ickes that helped stripped their VOTES

Posted by: lauren | April 10, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

lauren are you even getting a response regarding Ickes the delegate stripper?

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Hillary or Obama, Michigan and Florida have to be seated and included by the Dem Party. You can’t exclude participation by two such pivotal states. It’s that simple. If the Dems cut these two key states out of the process they will lose them, and for maybe more than one eletion cycle. Something should be worked out to include them as quickly as possible. Dean has many strengths but he is not providing the strong leadership needed to resolve key issues like this one.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | April 10, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Leaving out Fl .and MI. is the only way Obama can win I have FOUR sisters in Fl. One lost a nephew in Iraq all four of thier husbands are vets and guess what they will vote for MCcain if FL. is not seated and counted before the nominee is chosen.

Posted by: Bishop | April 10, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

lauren – Vee haf vawys of enlightenment.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Dogsolider: This is most important thing that has come out of this election! That a canidate through the domination of left wing liberals who control the Caucus process can push through a canidate who is not geeting a mjority of the true democratic vote! Well everytime this has happened we have lost! I for one am not going back to the political wilderness and I will seperate myself from the party that I have belonged to for 30yrs. If Hillary loses then I will have no choice but vote for the only moderate left and that is John McCain! I have never voted for a Republican in my life, but I am left with no other choice. I am not a fan of Ronald Regan but he said something once that I now agree with. He said I did not leave the Democratic party the Democratic party left me! So it goes!

Posted by: russell | April 10, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

gee bishop….tell them to vote for mccain then, sheeeesh
Their rotations will only be 12 months instead of 15, what’s the big deal?

Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

hopesprings52
It’s not just seating the delegates. It’s making all participants feel like they’re really and realistically represented. Arbitrary apportionment of the votes won’t appease their anger.
Spinning aside, the state democrats and the state democrats alone violated the DNC rules. They’re the culprits who should be ridden out of town on a rail.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 10, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

If Obama is award 40% of the Michigan delegates he most likely will be getting more than he deserves. No one force him to take his name of the ballot. It was shortsighted and “stupid” for the Obama campaign to remove his name from the ballot. After was wasn’t he running a campaign. How can anyone (Howard Dean,etc) determine which 10% of the voters in Michigan who expressed their preference by voting for Hiliary Clinton should be award to Obama because his campaign was to shortsighted to leave his name on the ballot. If he gets the 40% that included everyother candidate except Hiliary he should shut up and move on. Certainly, If I was a voter in Michigan and my vote was awarded to Obama after I voted for Hiliary, I would be extremely outraged about it and rightly so. Dean and the DNC can do the right thing and award the delegate based on the votes that has already been certified.

Posted by: winningo853 | April 10, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

“Democrats United”: That’s a FUNNY name—–from La-La Land, as in “from obama’s fairy-tale world”.
The Democratic Party will NEVER Unite again. I Promise. Not after THIS election year. Some of us are voting for McCain, some of us are not going to vote at all, some of us are voting for the Independent candidate. If Hillary is indeed the Nominee, some of us will vote for her. Nothing Nancy Palosi or Howard Dean or the DNC can promise, or threaten, or suggest, or beg—-can change our minds. No, Mr. obama: we cannot be BOUGHT, either.
Mr. McCain, to myself and others, is preferable for another 4 years until we can elect some other Democrat…….but Mr. obama will NOT WIN. I can TAKE 4 more years of Republicans (did I just SAY that??)—-but NOT even ONE DAY of obama. Period. Call it what you will.
It is MY choice and MY VOTE. : )

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Why should she drop out, such becoz she is behind in delegate count…please this fight isn’t over yet….and just wait till next week folks….when Clinton Campaign release a bombshell bout Obama….not so good after all….

Posted by: Daniboi | April 10, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

russell – I did read about that Regan comment and at the time thought little of it, but Regan’s words sure mean a whole heck of a lot now. 30 Years with the democratic party, Russell? I’m barely older than that. And still looking for the perfect lady who somehow refuses to fall through my ceiling unlike some commercials. And yes, I did try the product and no lady dropped down in a bathtub.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

MYSOGONY of the Dem Party and the Media!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Sean McM | April 10, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

LA in Indiana and Lauren: Can’t you take a hint that we are ignoring you? Don’t go away mad, just GO AWAY. : )

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Once again, the Obama we all know, talks out of both sides of his mouth. Today, He’s telling blue-collar workers in PA that he’s a Washington outsider without any national experience. Of course, that’s in direct contradistinction to his prior statements that he has exemplar national-level political and policy experience. It’s also a hoot, given his entrenchment in the Chicago political machine for more than a decade (which is far worse than Washington). Hopefully, PA voters can see through this double talk.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: Emily | April 10, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Obama’s friendship with Ayers is going to be a big problem and the only ones who think it isn’t is the crazy far left Lahay,Dean,Kerry, etc you know thw ones who liked to burn the flag in the streets in the sixty’s While boys in the working class familes were Drafted right out of High School While we were seeing our loved ones off because we had no choice they were hanging out protesting everything.

Posted by: Bishop | April 10, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Dogsolider: Like they say in my part of the country: I am to young for Medicare and too old for women to care! Don’t ever stop being young dogsolider because thats when you died! Like Dylan says ” I was older then I much younger than that now!”

Posted by: russell | April 10, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

LA in Indiana
no I guess no one knows why.
I figured that 1 of her supporters would know.
Well i hope the reporters find out

Posted by: lauren | April 10, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

BKMC look regarding the bosnia flap-many of us cannot remember where our keys are let alone recount an issue that happened 12 years ago. it is common knowledge that the human mind retains ‘feelings of danger’ versus the reality. many store clerks after being robbed remember fearing for their lives even when the perpetrator did not have a weapon. in hillary’s defense at least she has been in a war zone versus obama.

Posted by: sonia trevino | April 10, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., vented frustration that the Democratic Party has failure to come to a resolution about how to handle the convention delegations in Florida and Michigan.
she should be frustrated withher SENIOR ADVISOR HAROLD ICKES FOR VOTING TO STRIP THE DELEGATES

Posted by: lauren | April 10, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

(It’s not their fault they are young and unclear how electoral races work.)
I happen to be 55yrs old I AM FOR OBAMA
And at this point I really do not care if he win the GE as long as Hillary is not the Nominee.I will vote for Obama on April 22. If she some how steals the nominee I will not vote for the first time in my life I will sit this election out. It is sicken read all this radical post from simple minded people
I do believe that America will get what they deserve.My sons are grown I have a career and Health insurance I can hold out for another 4 years

Posted by: PDC | April 10, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Dean is great at involving folks, utilizing the internet, fundraising and taking the Dems to all 50 states. But he is not exercising the firm hand that is needed now. You need a very strong party boss right now to twist people’s arms and cut some deals on these knotty issues. If the Dems can’t work out problems among themselves how are they going to work with Repubs.?

Posted by: hopesprings52 | April 10, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Russell – Like they say in my part of the country: I am to young for Medicare and too old for women to care!
Lol. Heck, Russell, its good to see you laugh. Not so much when you fill up your gas tank maybe, and yes I work for big oil, so you do have a name you can curse on a daily basis. That is besides Obama.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

It seems in liberal la la land, it’s okay to ignore the wishes of voters in the two largest states, states critical to victory in Nov. YOU OWN VOTERS, no less. Clinton is right, whether she came to it for political reasons or not. Disenfranchising people doesn’t feel democratic, or just. Is a rule something to be regarded if it is wrong? And it goes against our principals as a free society? Rules can be changed. The DNC wants to cram an ultra liberal down our throats and it appears they will win. Temporarily, that is.

Posted by: A reader in Georgia | April 10, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

PDC – 55? Radical? Now who would those radical be according to your suggestion?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Lauren: you can post that SAME thing over and over again, but no one is biting : ) Ha ha ha ha.
Are you an obama supporter? or a McCain supporter? Why, then are you SO concerned with who Hillary has or does not have on her campaign staff? :)

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

The culprits were the state democrats who clearly and intentionally violated the DNC rules.

Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

The Democrats are a bunch os losers anyway. I am withdrawing my support from the Democrats this cycle. What a joke.
Proud Democratic Defector

Posted by: tony | April 10, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

PDC please learn how to spell. i mean especially if you are going to insult and refer to others as simple minded.

Posted by: sonia trevino | April 10, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

I love all of the anti-Clinton posts. LOL — you guys keep forgetting that each post simply drives away Clinton’s supporters. I am defintely set at this point: no Obama vote for me. I am organizing a “Democratic Defector” group in my home state. We have about 200 members now. LOL – the Dems will definitely lose.

Posted by: tony | April 10, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

I just heard about that obama ad in PA and the ad showing his (white) Gramdma, and obama saying that she is a “Typical White Woman”—–is THAT a racial statement, OR W H A T ??????

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

tony
Don’t withdraw completely. Vote Nader.

Posted by: Turku Wren | April 10, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

LA in Indiana and Lauren: Can’t you take a hint that we are ignoring you? Don’t go away mad, just GO AWAY. : )
Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | Apr 10, 2008 7:19:02 PM
NO WE ARE TOO MUCH LIKE HILLARY
ITS A FRE BLOG TOO BAD FOR YOU.
SO CAN YOU ANSWER MY QUESTION? WHY IS ICKES STILL ON HILLARY’S CAMPAIGN? HE IS THE REASON SHE IS IN THIS MESS? AND THE AMERICAN VOTERS ARE

Posted by: lauren | April 10, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Dogsoldier – I spoke with some long time center Democrats and they tell me this is really all about the anger of the liberals in the party. Prior to 1992, the liberal wing controlled the party (notice they were only successful in getting Carter elected which was a wash.) When Bill Clinton won in 1992 and the following election, the moderates took control of the party and the liberal have been mad ever since. This is why they have such disdain for Senator Clinton. The liberal wing has decided the party cannot survive without their control and if they cant take it back they would rather it split and give the election to McCain.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 10, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Turku Wren – Nader is an option. I don’t think I could bring myself to vote for McCain, but I could vote for Nader.

Posted by: tony | April 10, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

From the beginning Hillary has said the FL and MI should count. — Summy
Summy, when is “from the beginning”? It reminds me when Hillary said “I criticized the war before Obama did” in January 2005, ignoring that Obama opposed and criticized the Iraq war in 2002 when she voted for it. Even then, assuming the war started in 2005, it was shown that he actually criticized 8 days prior to the date she says she criticized it.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/in-oregon-clint.html

Posted by: Tim | April 10, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

rock
Looks like Obama will win. Best then to vote for Nader!

Posted by: Turku Wren | April 10, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

hey, Tony: are ya residing in the state of IL? That would be GREAT! There was a Democratic State Senator here in IL who came out today and suggested that Gov. Blajeoyavich resign because of his connection to Tony Rezko (hmmmmm……WHO ELSE DO WE KNOW with connections to Rezko?).
The Democratic Party here in IL is imploding because everyone is connected to Rezko and it’s coming out in Rezko’s Federal Corruption trial in Chicago. Most Democrats are FINISHED in this state—-(and I am a Democrat—-and ashamed!!). There will be a lot of Illinois Democrats who will defect to another Party, or will create their own Party. You’d have a good business here in this state ! “Democrat Defectors”.

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Interesting info, Bishop…..thanks for the post…..it makes sense, really…..

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Keep it coming, Bishop !! This is great !!!

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Obama’s unscrupulous Chicago friends and close associates: Rezko, Blago, Daley, Stroger, et al.
Obama’s unsavory friends and spiritual mentors: Wright, Meeks, Ayers, Frank Davis, et al.
Obama’s corporate big oil and lobbyist connections/contributors: Exelon Corp, Houston-based Mission Resources Corp., Tulsa-based Kaiser-Francis Oil Co., Mr. Hsu, Iraqi Billionaire of ill repute, Nadhmi Auchi, et al.
Scandals thus far: REZKOGATE, NAFTAGATE, CRACK GATE, WRIGHTGATE, GAY-SINCLAIR GATE, et al.
All this in a few short months. Stay tuned for the next installment…
GO HILLARY!

Posted by: Emily | April 10, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

…..to include My 2 cents’ worth about Liberal Democrats—-there have been NO—–that is NADA, NONE—-NO LIBERAL DEMOCRATS that have been elected in the last 40 years—–MAYBE John F. Kennedy was, but THAT was the last one……and others were SO threatened by he and his brother, Robert……
All of the DEMOCRATIC Presidents that have been elected since Kennedy have been either “Conservative” or “Moderate” Democrats—–Bill Clinton, our greatest Democratic President since John F. Kennedy, was a Moderate Democrat. Hillary Clinton is ALSO an Moderate Democrat. Think about that.

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Hillary Supporter
Some voters prefer waving hands, nose to the sky, and BS.

Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Dogsoldier:
“Beyond” is you in the rear view mirror.

Posted by: Saywhat? | April 10, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Dogsoldier, WestCoastMessenger visit many of the blogs and tend to cut and paste their comments verbatim…I truly think they are doing so simply to “stir the pot” and breed contention;No need to bite. I quite honestly expect this MI/FL
issue to be hauled out anew each and every time the Clinton campaign sees a slip in her numbers…It doesn’t have to be factual they just need to get it out there periodically and there is a certain segment of voters who will bindly accept it without checking their facts.. I’ve seen many responses by posters who identify themselves as being from MI and FL who contradict the Clinton campaigns claims. Oh and I’ve watched the 08/19/06 C-span televising of the vote where Kathleen Sullivan (NH-Clinton supporter)speaks against any front-loading in the primaries (that includes MI) and states emphatically that she has the support of Bill and Hillary Clinton against front-loading of the primaries. And where Stephanie Tubbs Jones(Clinton-supporter) speaks in favor of the DNC decision to allow only Iowa, NH, SC and Nev to hold their elections prior to Feb 5 and to penalize state who move up their primaries before Feb 5.
-Posted by IntelliWhitfeminWoman

Posted by: Laura | April 10, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

I was just thinking that if we are mostly Democrats who are posting here, then the Republicans must be loving it cause we are just a sad, sad group. LOL(:

Posted by: Saywhat? | April 10, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Lose the DNC and Fire Dean Howard! Hillary should run as an independent. The DNC has turned its back on its own members…and now the members will go Indie.

Posted by: Forget the DNC | April 10, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

It’s a sad day when the only thing that matters to many voters is to see the same old faces, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton… forever. Why vote for someone who is for and against NAFTA? For and against her husband? Against racism but using race baiting to win the election? I never thought Bill and Hillary Clinton could be so opportunistic. I feel more comfortable with Bush in the White House than with the Clintons. At least you know that Bush can’t tell lies well, but Hillary is so sneaky and duplicitous. I don’t think she is really in love with Bill anyway. Do you ever see them really show any public affection?
I think Nancy Pelosi has a lot more credibility than her. If I were Obama, I’d choose her as VP in a heartbeat.

Posted by: a person | April 10, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Here’s a thought. Each state’s super delegates (not including FL and MI) vote in accordance to who won the state. Na, too simple.

Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

10% of the Clinton’s 101 million went to charity to her own clinton library fund, it means that she deducted 10% in taxes of the 101 million so instead of paying 33% of taxes she paid 22% of taxes for all this years.
Mrs. Clinton is more smart than Martha Stewart, Martha Stewart went to jail, while Mrs, Clinton is demanding for votes in florida and Michigan. Cynism?

Posted by: alma Ludivina | April 10, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Obama is a FAKE!!!
He is a calculative FAKE!!!
I will never vote for him.
All the media just LOVE him (MSNBC is just sucking up to him), I have
to go to FOX is get some real news.
I hope Hillary wins in the end and I hope she would never give interview to
these MSNBCs!!!!

Posted by: very_mad | April 10, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

With obama having a friend like Rezko, who was sent money from the guy in Iraq…..well, geez! If obama becomes President, why SHOULD he pull our troops out of Iraq? It means security and re-building by us Americans for THEM Iraqis…..then obama could PARDON REZKO and they could both skip and sing their way to visit the friend in Iraq…..

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

alma Ludivina – See you in Denver. Here a list for you to do with the Obama camp.
March with Al Sharpton.
Talk with Jessie Jackson.
Rub shoulders with Ayers.
Have a prayer meeting with Reverend Wright.
Curse the Jews with Farrakhan.
Meet Gaddaffi in person.
Wear proud American pins with Michelle. Curse Hillary.
Share Rezko money with Rezko.
Plan the overthrow with notable terrorists from the middle east.
Get friendly with goats, Obama’s daddy’s goats.
Check Obama’s grandmother tire tracks for being run over by Obama’s bus, TWICE.
Play raise the taxes on the people game. And other fun stuff.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Myles,
To even attempt to put Obama in the same category as Gore is an insult to Al Gore.
Al Gore ran his unsuccessful campaign with dignity, and his only mistake was to separate himself from Bill Clinton.
Barack Obama has done participated in old politics as usualy, all the time saying he isn’t doing so.

Posted by: JA | April 10, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

I am for Hillary, lest that obama win the Nomination—–then I’m GONE, GONE, GONE…..(unless maybe I can actually write her in at the General Election !).

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Tony, Your post said it all, my friend. You are 100% correct. If the democrats won’t stand up against voter disenfranchisement, who will? And if the democrats will stand by and let the media tear one of their own to shreds because she’s a woman, what is the point? I thought we were progressives? I especially agree with your point about a “lifetime of involvement” being viewed as negative. I am with you, my friend. I am very very disappointed in the party, and I think Obama will lose big in November.. then, what will remain of the democratic party? And more importantly, what happens to middle class families like mine who are struggling? Who will represent us?
A white, middle class, working mother.

Posted by: An opinion | April 10, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

American People say no to Mrs. Clinton Socialised medicine (Universal Health Plan)
If something is perceived as free, people will consume more of it than they would if they had to pay for it.
free public medicine isn’t really free. What the consumer doesn’t pay, the taxpayer does. Social medicine discriminates against the productive.
Poor quality of services.
Patients often feel they are on an assembly line.
Cancer sufferers denied the opportunity to improve their chances by paying privately for drugs.
General practitioners reduced the average time they spent with their patients
Hospital emergency rooms have become their primary doctor. Patients lie in temporary beds in emergency rooms, sometimes for days.
Surgery candidates face long waiting lists it can take six months to have a cataract removed.
Heart surgeons report patients dying on their waiting lists. But then, it’s free

Posted by: alma Ludivina | April 10, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

A couple of things:
mixed-american provided several examples of candidates that took their fight all the way to the convention: Reagan ’76, Carter ’80, Dukakis ’88. You want to know what all of those candidates have in common? In November they lost.
Several of you have written about the ‘Constitutional Right’ of a state held primary. I’m sorry, there is no such Constitutional right to participate in a state primary for a political party nomination. Parties are not in the constitution, and the party alone sets the rules of their elections.
Others have written about the need to use a ‘winner-take-all’ system. Clinton’s focus on the big states would have assured her the nomination had this been a winner take all. The Democratic party is trying to make the process more Democratic so that the cities of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York are not the sole decision makers of every single nomination. The voices of the rest of the country are important, too.
Some of you complain that it’s not fair that
Still others talk about Clinton being in favor of counting MI and Fl from the start. Again, sorry. This has only been since loosing a string of primaries in Feb. Her campaign manager Harold Ickes was a top DNC official that pushed the MI & FL punishment through. Hillary signed off and agreed to the terms that those primaries do not count. As recently as Iowa, Clinton repeatedly stated the party line that MI & FL should not count because they broke the rules.
Clinton’s desire for all votes to be heard? I seem to recall her air of inevitability that projected a clinch after Super Tuesday. In this scenario, no votes since Feb 6 would have mattered. Clinton was caught unprepared to fight through Feb and lost 11 contests by massive margins. It took her a full month to recover. Did you know that she didn’t even file a full slate of delegates for the PA primary? Her campaign was so confident that this would have been over already.
On the issue of Obama’s apparent unwillingness to accept a re-do in MI or FL: Could the nation honestly accept an election funded by Clinton donors and executed by Clinton private contractors? Really??
Obama as a racist? This one takes the cake. For those of us who have taken the time to actually watch the entire sermon(s) or read the entire book, you’ll quickly realize that Obama’s book and Rev Wright are sending a different message than the cherry picked excerpts lead you to believe.
To supporters of both sides: Whining and complaining about the situation doesn’t change the situation. If all the Clinton supporters can muster are personal attacks that lack any shred of substance, that should be an indication to Obama supporters that they have nothing left to argue. And if all the Obama supporters have no better argument than the fact that Obama will be ahead in the pledged delegate vote and popular vote total on June 7, that should be an indication to Clinton supporters that he’ll be our nominee.

Posted by: Jim Jones | April 10, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Obama supporters are so stupid critizing about the Michigan and Florida votes. Howard Dean needs to step down, they should have paid for a revote in Michigan and count Florida as is. He has cost the democrates the Nov election now. There is absolutely no way we can win now in Nov if we lose those two states. Obama supporters if you really want your man to win stop complaining. Promise you he wont win if you dont win those two states. That is a definite. The smartest thing he could do right now is say seat them the way they voted. It might help him win over all but he probably waiting till he can do the math without them and then we will try to be a hero and statesmen and say then to count them. He is pathetic

Posted by: Doug | April 10, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Not educated people vote for Clinton… and you can tell by their posts.

Posted by: Jose | April 10, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Kennedy took the fight to the floor in Aug.of 80 with Carter he had around 1200 Carter had 1900 Regan won the election in 1980 In 68 they put a Humprey on the ticket but it was a big fight McGovern had a million more votes I think I can’t remember I have to check on it.Nixon won that one we lost.

Posted by: Bishop | April 10, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

She should first explain to the families of those 4000 dead soldiers why she decided to send them to their death if she want anybody to believe her on anything.

Posted by: chuegevera | April 10, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

With so many different ways to acquire news and information, why are people so naive (ok, just plain phukkin stupid) to continue to insist that Obama is the one to blame for FL and MI? Wake the F up!!! The rules were set by the DNC, and Obama has followed those rules. Meanwhile, Hillary, who also agreed to follow the rules, is now trying to renege, and say that the votes should count. How fair is it if no candidates campaigned in Florida, or if all Democratic candidates were not even on the ballot in MI (except for Hillary, who broke the rules)? Furthermore, how can you not be disgusted by all of Hillary’s constant “mis-speaking”, and her two-faced back-room Trade Agreement deals? Hillary is the most devisive politician in the history of politics. There is no middle ground. People (the narrow-minded sheep) either love her, or people despise her. How can she ever be a unifier, let alone President. And if she’s so frustrated with the Democratic Party, feel free to excuse yourself at any time. I would go so far as to say, “don’t let the door hit you in the ass”, but how could it miss?

Posted by: 40yr old white guy in NC | April 10, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

DJ:
Easy solution: Just count the votes (ie: Fla. in 2000). If you think the “rules” as they stand (and other states violated them by leapfrogging ahead in the calendar, too; but they aren’t being punished), then hold another election.
The main, only point is: Count the votes.

Posted by: Myles | April 10, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

This lady is really terrible. people form Florida and Michigan are not stupid. They understand that you are opportunist, you didnot care about their vote untill you knew that you can not make it.

Posted by: leche | April 10, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Jose: I am a Hillary supporter and I have a Master’s Degree……so THERE….Hillary supporters ARE intelligent—–you are misinformed, to be nice……

Posted by: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party? | April 10, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Humphrey had the least amount of votes when he got nominated That was a long hot summer war protest race riots Robert And Martin what a time you could see the fire from Trenton on the Pa side of the river the sky lit up rolling stones I can’t get no satisfaction what a time in history . This is what comes into my mind when I think of 68

Posted by: Bishop | April 10, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

You ALL OBAMANATOR Just try to win this close election WITHOUT Counting FLORIDA and MICHIGAN I will and Lot of People will Vote for Mcain.
HILLARY ALL the WAY. We will be there for you HILLARY 2008.

Posted by: neal | April 10, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Until recently, the New Black Panthers were linked from Obama’s website.
If you’re not familiar with the New Black Panthers, here’s a taste of what they have to offer: (copied from their 10 point plan.)
“8. We want freedom for all Black Men and Black Women held in international, military, federal, state, county, city jails and prisons.
We believe that all Black People and people of color should be released from the many jails and prisons because they have not received a fair and impartial trial. ‘Released’ means ‘released’ to the lawful authorities of the Black Nation.”
Is this the kind of attitude we want in the White House?

Posted by: truth | April 10, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

actually Dean with hillary delegates could seat the delegates from Florida and Michigan! Its in the rules!!!

Posted by: where the beef? | April 10, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

bobby – thanks, unfortunately I have to make a living and do not have time to devote to a full time blog… maybe in the future.
Another item of note for all those actually watching the numbers:
Even without FL and MI, after the remaining contest are complete and all the state conventions are finished (last one is June 29), if the delegate count is less than 2% difference, 80 delegates could tip the nomination either way. There are 76 unpledged delegates that can be appointed by state parties at the DNCC. This is in addition to the current count of delegates and superdelegates. It is common for delegates to change their vote over and over at the convention as multi-ballots are necessary to actually give a nominee enough delegates. Usually, this does not matter because the races are not close. However, this is the tightest nomination race in history. We have even had previous races where the candidate in the lead at the beginning of the DNCC did not get the nomination more than once. Some of those awarded nominations at the convention actually became Presidents, like Woodrow Wilson and FDR. Granted that was before superdelegates but it is all relative. Delegates of all types determine who the nominee is… not the voters. Our votes are simply guidelines for the delegates. Superdelegates represent the party and potential voter’s remorse because we do not have a national primary. Their job is to ensure the democrats do not have another landslide defeat like Incumbent Carter or McGovern. You can find some detailed history on how it all really works and why if you do a bit of research online.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 10, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

At least Hillary did not campaign in Fl. Obama broke his word,and the rules by spending $1.3 million in TV ads in Florida

Posted by: where the beef? | April 10, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Bottom line. At the end of the day, neither will have the number to win. Like it or not the process is not “democratic” Seat Florida and Michigan and it will prove Hillary to be the winner.

Posted by: Texas Lil | April 10, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

TO: Tony (post at 8:49 P.M. EST), Well done! Beautiful and insightful remarks.
TO: What Happened to the REAL Democratic Party?,
I thought about what you said in an earlier post while I was having dinner. I was thinking that when in my twenties, I considered myself to be a liberal democrat. I believed in equality for all (irrespective of gender, race, or ethnicity), I distrusted the republicans ardently, and I routinely advocated for the underprivileged on both the state and county levels. Even as a professor of business, I was proud to be the lone democrat in a department loaded with pompous, fat cat republicans. However, in an earlier post, I found myself saying that I’m a moderate democrat. That’s the first time I’ve ever said those words—moderate democrat. Over dinner, I began to worry that perhaps my movement toward a moderate political perspective is a function of getting older. I don’t, however, actually think that’s it. I think the chief reason is that the Democratic Party has failed us during this primary season—lifelong, loyal democrats. They’ve piled the following crap on us: 1. That it’s permitted to be racist, but only if you’re black. 2. That a female candidate can’t advance the problem of sexism/misogyny, but a black candidate can rally racism (no matter how unfairly). 3. That the media can, and will dictate which candidate is preferential, and which candidate will receive an unprecedented level of scrutiny. 4. That the DNC can, and will disenfranchise millions of democratic voters as a punitive measure, despite the Florida republican’s control of the 2008 Florida primary process. 5. That the voice of the entire electorate is inconsequential, because the DNC and a few angry ultra-liberal legislators have determined that Obama is the candidate, and they will use any means necessary to force Hillary out of the race. Have I missed anything?

Posted by: Emily | April 10, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Hillary can’t beat McCain, as consistently proven by the polls. The polls right now show that Obama beats McCain in the general election and Hillary LOSES. Hillary is BY FAR the most divisive political figure in modern history. There’s a reason for that. Whereas Obama has a large lead over Hillary among college educated, informed Americans, Hillary has a lock on the “information-deprived”–a euphemism created by Gallup. Hillary is a desperate power-monger and carpet-bagging political opportunist. She lies, she flip flops constantly, and she takes in more money from big corporate pharmaceuticals than any other candidate ever. She wants to finish out her term and then put Chelsea in as her successor as next in line for the Clinton dynasty. She also wants to redecorate the White House in pathetic tepid mauve. WAKE UP AMERICANS. This lady is DANGEROUS.
Hillary ain’t it.

Posted by: thinkaboutit | April 10, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Hillary is a hypocrite. In the beginning, she was willing to not let the votes count as she was ahead. Now, suddenly, she’s on a crusade to make them count. Those states did not respect the rules, it’s not the voters fault, but they should be angry at their state leaders, not Obama or the DNC.

Posted by: Anthony | April 10, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Boy jacksmith you have it all wrong. Actually Republicans (called by Rush Limbaugh notably), have been voting for Hillary as they think she will be beaten more easily or want to drag on the Dem race.
Look at the daily polls, look, Obama is always ahead in the Democratic Presidential race and he’s maintaining his lead for at least a month…
Also, Hillary is the only candidate of the three that has more unfavorable ratings than favorable ones. She is the only one that is over 50% seen as untrustworthy. And last I heard about half of the people would never vote for her under any circumstance, that’s all voters included. That makes Hillary unelectable.

Posted by: Anthony | April 10, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

I truly hope that Hillary Clinton gets the nomination. Everyone who hates her made up their minds to hate her before this election ever started. I don’t think I would go McCain if Obama wins it, but I will need a LOT of convincing before I will vote for Obama. He has a lot of explaining to do and has spent no time trying to do it. A pandering, sophomoric speech that any articulate college kid could have written does not answer the question. Several detractors are fond of saying he hates whites. I don’t know who he hates. He doesn’t need to explain his presence in that church to me. I want to know, in detail, what he believes. Does he think whites created aids, distributed crack. In his opinion is the 3 strikes law a bad thing? Does he blame us for all of the problems in that community? If so why? This is what I want, an explanation. I know Hillary lies. The only reason it looks like it is all the time is that she is so scrutinized. If you believe her to be any worse a liar than the other 2 than you are being foolish. I believe she has the best interests of Americans at heart. She is a bad story teller. I think she is a good person, and since I think that, and don’t know what to think about Obama, I prefer her

Posted by: Zack | April 11, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Look at the delegate total for Mi and Fl. Then add the supers she would get because Obama has tried to keep their votes from counting!!!

Posted by: where the beef? | April 11, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Judgement is supposed to be the reason to back Obama. Well any candidate that would support an anti-america, hate monger, racist, for 20 YEARS. Take his wife and children to hear this does not have the good judgement to lead our nation!!!

Posted by: where the beef? | April 11, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I think Florida and Michigan will be seated at the DNC. They have to be represented and the delegate vote will not be split evenly. I see Hillary getting these votes. If by chance, they aren’t and Obama wins the nomiation, he won’t win in the GE because he will need Florida and Michigan, which, everyone knows he will not get. The media is so biased toward their “golden boy” Obama, and so mean to Hillary. However, Obama is his own worst enemy. He wants to meet with Hamas, the people who want to annihilate Israel, he has a close association with Ayers (underground terrioist) that just broke, his wife is excluding Asians and Blacks for whites now at rallies, then Reverend Wright, Rezko, Obama’s lies on NAFTA, and the fact that he is a Muslim Apostate….man, this guys laundry is dirtier than anyone I know! He’s self destructing…..but, he does have one thing Hillary doesnt have…the campaign funding….which, is coming from Muslim backers….Farrakahn has pulled many, many favors to get Obama his money. If elected, Obama wont’ rule America….Farrakahn will.

Posted by: jack | April 11, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Here are some facts about the Florida and Michigan primaries.
(1) The agreement signed by all the candidates specifically said, “I pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any election contest occurring in any state not already authorized by the DNC to take place in the DNC approved pre-window (any date prior to February 5, 2008).” Notice the phrase “campaign OR participate.”
(2) Obama had ads in Florida as part of a national ad buy. Those were not considered against the rules, as they were purchased well in advance. Clinton appeared at small fundraisers in Florida before the primary. Those were allowed, as the agreement included language allowing candidates to appear at MI/FL fundraisers of under 200 people.
(3) I see claims that Clinton has run a better campaign than Obama. That is, well, Hillarious. Obama started out with, well, nothing. No exploratory committee, no superdelegate endorsements, no machine support, no campaign fund. Clinton had 200 superdelegates and $120 million in the bank – before Iowa. Now, all she has is a 130-delegate deficit and a $5 million IOU. Obama, on the other hand, is averaging just $109 per campaign donation, has close to 2 million donors, no debt, and can easily afford to fight both Clinton AND McCain.
The fact that Obama’s leading at all is a testament to his superior organizational and fundraising skills.
There are certainly arguments to be made in favor of Hillary Clinton. However, you’ll want to stay far, far away from the concepts of honesty or campaign management. She’ll lose on both counts.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

where the beef? rev. Wright is an angry person, a knuclehead, but the Clintons think that they own the White House, their list of dirty laundry is a mile longer than that of Obama’s, and even if she wins the nomination, she might still lose in the fall, McSame know all her faults…

Posted by: Bill | April 11, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Oh yeah….about “campaign or participate”….all the candidates stayed on the Florida ballot. This was only because of a state law that only allows primary candidates to appear on general-election ballots in the state.
Just in case someone whines about “Why didn’t Obama withdraw in Florida?” :)

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Hillary needs to dump the Democrat Party and run as an independent. I am a life-long Democrat who is tired of the DNC and of the people in leadership in the Party–Dean, Peloski, Richardson, Kerry, Carter, Kennedy and especially the OBAMA family. In the past, I totally opposed Sean Hannity and Karl Rove, but I actually find myself agreeing with them and their assessment of Obama. I will be voting Republican for the first time in 25 years if Obama is the nominee!

Posted by: Debbie F | April 11, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Peggy – Good points and so true! Great post!!!!

Posted by: sandy | April 11, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Peggy You are mistaken…Before a revote in either state, both Obama and Hillary has to agree. Obama refused!!!

Posted by: DebbieF | April 11, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Penn was representing his own business not the Clinton campaign and that is why he got fired!!!

Posted by: where the beef? | April 11, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Obama stop the revote in Michigan.

Posted by: where the beef? | April 11, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Beef, so how did the Clintons make $800k from Penn’s deal?

Posted by: Bill | April 11, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

And Hillary did not know about Penn’s dealings – her strategist and good friend. Give me a break! And now Bill’s ties with the same Columbian company. Sure, Hillary did not know. LOL!

Posted by: sandy | April 11, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I suppose I can understand the frustration of Clinton supporters. She’s a highly competent candidate, and in many ways, she’s suffered from the incompetence of some of her biggest supporters.
Mark Penn has been an unmitigated disaster for her campaign from the beginning. In late 2007, she was killing everyone at the debates, and running at 40% in the polls – against EIGHT competitors.
I bet there’ll be at least one book written that tries to answer this question: why, in a year when incumbents in general are likely to get the boot from angry voters, would Clinton choose to be the “experience” candidate (perhaps the one area, by the way, where McCain would dust her)?
Bill Clinton personally started the AA vote turning away from her with his ridiculous comments in South Carolina. No, I don’t think Clinton is racist. But he’s way too astute a politician to let himself talk about Obama being a “fairy tale” in a state with a heavy Black population.
Penn should’ve taken a leave of absence from his position at Burson-Marsteller. The Colombia thing (not to mention him STILL representing Blackwater) is a massive conflict of interest.
WJC’s been paid $800,000 to drum up support for free trade with Colombia. Another massive conflict of interest – and potentially much more damaging than Mark Penn. Bill can only be demoted with divorce papers.
Finally, WJC goes today and reopens the Tuzla scab. Hillary had done a decent job of stopping the bleeding from that one, but here comes ol’ Slick Willie to defend it again – with more lies!
Here’s a link to the article reporting WJC’s comments on Tuzla today. It’s the lead item on Ben Smith’s Politico blog: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/
Two people who should have been the biggest help to Hillary Clinton are instead doing everything they can, it seems, to discredit her. THAT’S the real tragedy of this campaign season.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

where the beef?: Feel free to post a link…some facts…anything…ANYTHING. It would make me take you seriously.
I don’t mind anyone supporting Clinton. It’s all good, as long as a Democrat wins in November. But why lie in your support?

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Obama lost the election when he chose his pastor, spirtual mentor, Rev Wright over the American people. It is very simple his “JUDGEMENT” failed. And this was an easy test!!!

Posted by: where the beef? | April 11, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

I’m sitting here reading these posts and it amazes me the insults that are being thrown back and forth. If you ask me, we are ALL victims of this campaign. I think the media has been very unfair to all the candidates, but especially Clinton and Obama. There is freedom of press and I’m glad, but everytime I turn on the TV, I see clips of Clinton in Bosnia or the Reverend Wright over and over again. Why can’t the media focus on the candidates platforms, their agendas, etc. This is the first time in history we have an African American and a Lady running for the highest office in the land. We, as Americans, should be celebrating, not tearing each other to pieces. They both are very good candidates, and from what I see, are very focused on the problems America is facing and trying their hardest to present plans to remedy her problems. I think we should pressure the media to focus on the candidates, all of them, ideals on the issues before us. I wish it would be possible for all the hateful posts to stop, and we could somehow post the good qualities of our candidates of choice. This is just my opinion. May God Bless America, all of us.

Posted by: Carpe Diem | April 11, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Why is not anyone calling on Hillary Two talk about voting? I want a Hillary supporter to answer this question.
Why did she not say anything when the DNC was making a decision on Mi and FL and then now says every VOTE needs to COUNT!!Then she comes out and says the pledge delgates can vote for who ever they want (no matter who won the state), and also says that the super delgates should vote on who they think will be the best, EVEN if it goes against the popular vote?
Remember Cacuses do not count in the popular vote. On FL and MI, also Obama wants a vote in MI and FL but everything so far has Voter fraud issues and the media misses that completly as Obama not wanting a vote. I rather have zero votes then a mislead voting (come on we all know the Clintons are not trust worthy)
Hillary is unelectable becuase her aproval rating is around 32%…..how can she win that way? Also that poll that says McCain clear the lead with Obama……It also cleared Hillaries lead, so get your facts right.
Can we PLEASE…PLEASE have America wake up to the Clintons non-caring about the voters..if she did care then the Popular vote should win the primary…..

Posted by: Josh | April 11, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Peggy
Obama is not only refusing to do a revote in Michigan/Florida. He continues to refuse to debate. He has only agreed to 1 debate for the remaining 10 states (and he was pressured into it). There are several debate requests that Hillary has agreed to but Obama has not responded. I guess this is like him voting present in the IL State Senate—afraid of making a commitment!!

Posted by: Debbie F | April 11, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Sooner or later, all the anti-Obama arguments end up returning to Jeremiah Wright or religion in general.
I suppose it’s understandable. Really, it’s a preview of the Republican strategery when Obama wins the nomination.
Continue to argue that line. It’s clearly worked up to this point.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

I do wish you people would back up your claims about Senator Obama…lots of rhetoric but no support. Give us some llnks, articles, anything, but do not continually spout this rhetoric and expect anyone to support the candidate you prefer. What you are doing is just plain destructive to the party and to your candidate.

Posted by: sandy | April 11, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

ObamaCult, do you believe Rev.Wight’s words? I don’t, and I don’t remember what seat he is running for, don’t think it’s president, I’ve been to many churches and many, many times not agreed with the pastor or priest.

Posted by: Bill | April 11, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

BMR Fact are facts. I pray that the Dems don’t nominate Obama. Obama will lose. Just think of all the video, Obama’s book, and what the Rep will run over and over again. Obama could destory all the gains of the last 3 years.

Posted by: where the beef? | April 11, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

She needs to go join Leiberman in limbo because when the wave comes they and the republicans are going to be swept away! The rational logical people are tired of being lead by the lemmings.

Posted by: Beka | April 11, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

where’s the beef – you keep saying ‘facts are facts’ but do not support your ‘facts.’ Again, like others hav asked here – where are your facts – give us some support.

Posted by: sandy | April 11, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Wheres the beef…Actually the reason that all the Dem leadership like Carter and Pelosi are supporting Barack is because the Clintons, Hillary specifically enabled the republican revolution. So unless she can prove in 2 weeks that she learned the lessons of the past….she is toast and you need to come to terms with it. You have to think of McBush as your president if you do not unify behind Barack Obama. It will be OK as long as a Democrat wins. We have this debate as well…we do not like what Hillary has become at all, but we will take one for the world and vote for her just to keep McBush out of office. You all need to do the same.

Posted by: Beka | April 11, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

DebbieF: You DO understand there have been 23 debates already, right? They’ve long since shattered the record for primary debates. The 4/18 debate will be #24.
Also, you may not be aware, but it’s an old political truism: The candidate who is trailing wants to debate more; the candidate who is leading wants to debate less.
The candidates have hashed, rehashed and regurgitated their positions so many times that even I (no policy wonk by any means) know the small differences between their health care plans.
At this point, what Clinton is hoping for is to get in a debate and do some attacking. That’s smart politics. Obama wants to avoid going into that gutter unless necessary. That’s also smart politics.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Obama said today that he is tired of GIVING SPEECHES and is just waiting to be seated in the “Presidential” office. We the people are the ones tired of his speeches based on lies and rethoric. His campaign is supported by billionaires and everybody else he has so proudly rejected. Hypocrite! OBAMA SUPPORTERS: WHAT IS THE EXCUSE NOW? TRY TO RESPOND BEFORE BEING TRAINED BY THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/10/AR2008041004045.html?hpid=topnews

Posted by: Definitely Common Sense | April 11, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Sandy, there are a whole lot of news stations on cable and a lot of news papers, not all of the links are correct, but it dosen’t hurt to follow up on some questions you have, all of the candidates are far from perfect, but Hillary is the worst one when it comes to telling the truth, and flip flopping, at least Obama was on tv and said that he didn’t agree with his pastor, but also not to toss him aside, which would have been very easy to do, then that would have made him a hypocrite.

Posted by: Bill | April 11, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Now it’s a thousand fairies dancing on the head of a pin???? Hysterical laughter, followed by an attack on Bush???(That’s called diversion) & no follow through by the reporter???
Did anyone bother to remind her that she’s blasting her own party for following rules that she & her campaign agreed to, voted for, & pledged to follow???
This science fiction Primary needs to end now & the supers should put it to rest before she’s allowed to destroy the Democratic party, & it truly appears that she’s willing to…

Posted by: Chapman | April 11, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Democrats need to realize that all of the excitement, emotion and enthusiasm generated in this primary season means nothing if we lose in November.
The Republican Party has grasped this basic concept. Even, say, in 1980, when Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush attacked each other tooth and nail – or, in 2000, when George W. Bush basically spent February slandering John McCain out of the primary – Republicans get their nominee, whoever it is, and march lockstep into the general election.
Think about it, Democrats. Look at the number of Democratic voters – in the primaries alone! Even discounting the “Rush Limbaugh Effect”, Democrats hold something like a 7- or 8-million vote edge. Now, imagine that we get that turnout for the general election.
The Democratic nominee could be Obama, Clinton, Gore, Dukakis, or a poster of Adlai Stevenson. ANYONE should be able to beat a guy who doesn’t know the difference between Iran and Iraq or Sunni and Shi’ite.
When this primary is over – whenever that is – we need to make sure we don’t screw up the general.
I’m an Obama supporter. I have never particularly liked Hillary Clinton, and though I respect her political skills enormously, I still think she’s an inferior nominee to Obama. But I’ve watched my savings dry up, jobs leave my area, and gas prices go up $2 per gallon since Bush 43 took office. So yeah, if HRC is the Dem nominee, I’ll be pulling her lever in November.
I CAN’T AFFORD FOUR MORE YEARS OF DUBYA. Johnny McSame promises exactly that. Any Democrat who would cross over – ESPECIALLY this year – was never a real Democrat in the first place.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Definitely Common Sense, good article, but all the candidates make money…

Posted by: Bill | April 11, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Bill – I realize that – it is just so frustrating looking at this drivel that is blatantly false. Hillary supporters that are so blinded are helping to desroy the party – they have come to the same mind set as Hillary – if I cannot have the nominee that I want I will help take the party down with me.

Posted by: sandy | April 11, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

BMR, 100% agree with you, McSame is not the guy, short tempered and to much of a loose cannon…

Posted by: Bill | April 11, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

BMR, I didnt say she ran a better campaign…. I said her ROI was better and that is a fact.
Each candidate had a different strategy so we cannot compare apples to oranges and say one was better than the other until after the convention.
Obama’s strategy was: expand the electorate with unlikely voters, appeal to liberals (matches his voting record), appeal to disgruntled Independents and Republicans, appeal to Identity voters, and try to gain sufficient popularity in the core to get the nomination. With unlimited funding, the method used in caucuses worked well because people were paid to work the ground campaigns and people are easily swayed with peer pressure in caucuses. Clinton’s core constituencies are unable to attend caucuses for the most part so that was no surpise. His campaign hyped the caucus and primary wins in red states to try to imply momentum and it worked in some of the primaries but eventually failed. Some say the novelty has worn off or he peaked too soon. I think the vetting is what is really hurting him. Time will tell if he can eventually succeed in his campaign goals.
Clinton’s strategy was a traditional one focused on winning key states required to beat the Rep candidate because of limited funding. While she did campaign in red states, she knew these states will not carry for the dems in Nov and focused on the key states. She has been successful in that strategy so far. Where she has had trouble is with the Identity voters for a variety of reasons. But the Identity voters in red states will not provide an electoral win in Nov. In fact, they are a significant minority nationwide when we consider the overall electorate that will be voting in Nov. In any case, time will tell if she succeeds in her campaign goals.
Per the rules, delegates from each state must represent the state ethnicity and at least 50% must be female as well. Since Identity voters account for 39% of the democratic electorate and women account for more than 50% of the democratic electorate, the candidate with the strongest female and white vote represents the will of the people in terms of the party core. Clinton maintains her core support. This means her campaign has been effective even with all the challenges. Obama’s campaign has been effective despite his challenges but the current polling trends (not single polls) are not in his favor.
No matter what happens, the nominee will not be decided until the convention unless one of them drops out. It is no surprise his surrogates who are afraid to do their job or afraid she will win are trying to push her out. No male candidate in the past was ever asked to pull out of a race or criticized for running all the way to the convention. It is clear who is running scared and who is applying discriminatory standards. There is no better way to prepare candidates to become nominees than a strong competitive race all the way to the convention. Nothing gets voters more energized and going all the way to the convention is the only way there is a possibility for a united party behind a unity ticket whomever that may be.
Superdelegates and regular delegates will all be considering several things at the convention: voter tallies, possible voter remorse, popular vote vs. delegate count, and most importantly, which candidate has shown they can win in Nov without party unity. That last one is a key factor since there is no way to guarantee or predict party unity. Counting the electoral equivalents in blue and projected swing states: Clinton 250+ electors, Obama 150+ electors… 270 electoral votes are needed to win in Nov. Clearly Clinton has enough support around the country to win 270. Obama on the other hand does not. There are not enough left to go around in the coming contests to give him 270 even if he won them all. Simply put, that means he cannot win without the majority of Clinton supporters which are voters he has failed to sway by any significant number. The delegates may look at these facts and conclude that with Clinton, they have the best chance to win in Nov and I would agree with them. Most of the uncommitted delegates are not going to make clear cut decisions until the remaining contests are completed and that is as it should be. The last thing the party needs is a bunch of flip flopping back and forth with every contest. We need to all sit back and let the system work and may the best candidate win.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Bill: Nice try. Yes they do. Except is the one that has been telling everybody that he does not take money from big companies, billionaires and lobbysts. Which proves again that he is running behind the big interests and not for the people as he says. All his grandiose allegations of being the underdog that is being supported by the poor working class are lies. Half of his supporters donate $200 or more. So again, nice try.

Posted by: Definitely Common Sense | April 11, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Sandy, I think Hillary is a smart person, but not very presidential, other countires are watching this election, and they see her lie, how are they going to feel when it come time form terms of peace or anything else you want to deal with…

Posted by: Bill | April 11, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

DCVoter: I wasn’t addressing you in particular. But claiming she has a better ROI is dubious, at best.
She’s raised about $170 million so far, and had HUGE built-in advantages (money, superdelegates, machine endorsements, name recognition, positive media coverage). Now, she’s got a $5 million IOU and her 200-delegate advantage before Iowa (all superdels) is now a 130-delegate deficit.
Obama has generated money in amounts that have left even seasoned political observers stunned. Almost 2 million individual donors have financed his campaign. For contrast, consider that John Kerry hit the 1-million-donor mark just before the convention in 2004. Average donation amount: $109.
He’s taken the money and spent it wisely. He needed it, because Clinton has started out with huge polling advantages in nearly every state. PA is a good example. Obama was 15-20 points behind, in a state where Clinton has the endorsements of the governor, the mayors of the 2 largest cities, the state Dem chairman, and the most powerful Dem rep in Congress. It’s virtually impossible for him to waste money here. And polls show him closing the gap to mid-single digits, thus proving he’s an effective campaigner and limiting the delegate damage.
His fundraising has given him three big advantages. He can buy prime-time air time to help get his message out. He also doesn’t have to spend nearly as much time at fundraisers. Finally, about 96% of his donors aren’t maxed out – so he can tap well over 1 million givers AGAIN for the general election.
Oh, and he still has about $30 million cash on hand.
ROI? He’s invested his money in travel, advertising and personal campaigning. He’s emerged from a scrum of 8 contenders, all trailing Clinton badly, and has a lead that grows more difficult for her to erase with each passing primary. His return on investment will likely be the nomination. Clinton can’t top that.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

ding – we wont agree on name recognition so that is moot. What matters now are the numbers and statistically they are tied.
As for your assertion about what she banked on.. I wouldnt presume to know. Dean is the one who pushed the idea that it would be over by Feb 5. Dean is the one who designed the schedule hoping that would be the case. Dean is the incompetent one on that point.
Did Clinton’s campaign manager prior to Feb 5 screwup by spending too much? Possibly but from what I read, the insiders in her camp stated Penn was responsible because he told them what to do and spend money on based on his position as chief strategist.. he denied responsibility (he is a weasel).
What impressed me after Feb 5 was her ability to quickly turn things around and raise record funds from her supporters who are primarily low to middle class income voters who are suffering the most economically. Do I think she ever worried about running out of money? No… she can always use her own money as did Romney and it is perfectly legal.
Being a woman of fiscal responsibility and an accomplished investor/attorney, I have no doubt she held money back from her campaign and is not investing into it on purpose and I dont blame her. She has proven she can deal with monetary crises, swiftly hold staff accountable and reorganize, and remain competitive in the race. These are important skills for a President in the challengins years ahead for this country. We will not have unlimited funding like Obama has. In fact, we have a huge debt and deficits to overcome… Clinton proves she knows how to deal with crises.
On another note, she made 10.5 mill from her books and she donated 10.5 mill to charity (yes a lot went to the foundation but the foundation dispensed the monies to the charitable causes). Obama donated less than 1% to charity and most went to his church yet his church spends money on promoting the activities of hate groups and shelters Wright with a $1.65M home and a $10M line of credit all tax free and unscrutinized by law.
So in my opinion, none of his donations went to charity. Clinton proves she cares about people. She doesnt need all the headaches that come with the job. She certainly doesnt need the salary. (Bill Clinton was the lowest paid President in history and GW Bush is the highest paid President in history.) There is no doubt she is running because she cares and believes she can do all the things she proposes. She has 30+ years working as a humanitarian and a champion of the people.
Obama has spent his 20 yr career running for offices, claims to have been a community organizer, has a wife who claims to have left corporate America while she earns over 300K/yr as a corporate VP at a hospital that charges uninsured patients 2.5 times what they charge insured patients, is being vetted with results showing he is unethical and corrupt (opposite his claim), and has strong ties to non-humanitarian associates who shaped his views and life as an adult.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Bill and BMR – you guys certainly have it together – and though you do not see eye-to-eye with us DC Voter, it is really nice to have an intellignet conversation though we may favor different candidates.

Posted by: sandy | April 11, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

One clarification on a previous post: When I said “…the most powerful Dem rep in Congress”, I should have said, “the most powerful *Pennsyvlania* Dem rep”. I’m referring to John Murtha there. I just wanted to clear up that ambiguity.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Definitely Common Sense: Thanks for the link.
Unfortunately for your argument related to that, it doesn’t say anything about a “Presidential” office. There’s not even a hint of the word “Presidential” or any derivative therein.
He’s tired of hearing himself talk. I’m sure ANY Presidential candidate is happy to be far, far away from any microphone by the time they’re done campaigning.
But don’t go and try to add words for the point of tearing him down. That only reduces *your* credibility.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 11, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

ROI has nothing to do with subjective factors like name recognition, built in advantages etc. People can argue influencing factors all day long and never reach a conclusion as to who is wrong or right because there are no concrete answers to subjective influences.
ROI means Return on Investment and that involves discreet math. She raised less and spent less yet she remains competitive. She has retained her core supporters and gained proportional support of the growing democratic electorate. Simple concept here regarding ROI and that is clearly a better ROI than Obama outraising and outspending her 4 to 1 to be in the same position.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

DVR – Senator Obama and his wife did donate to charity – it is in his tax returns. He did not have as much money to donate as the Clintons but he was charitable. Hillary has left several of her vendors high and dry – ccommon folk like you and I who depend on income for living expenses and to put back into their businesses – to me that is not very charitable. Senator Obama and his wife also have two small daughters to raise. Chelsea has a job of her own and can support herself. The cirumstances for both families are quite different.

Posted by: sandy | April 11, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Obama & his wife are typical affirmative action folks.

Posted by: Get Real | April 11, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

BMR I am not talking about delegates.. e delegate difference is less than 4% right now which is less than the margin of error in the pollings trends. The statistical tie I am referring to is nationally based on polling trends. If you dont follow them or understand how to read the polls you need to look at the details (if the number samples crossover it is a statistical tie) and not assume the tally shown with a margin of error is telling you the real truth. This is what I mean by applying statistial principles. Had the media and the pollsters done that all along they would have been able to correctly gauge and predict the will of the voters in each contest. (unlike their major screwups we have seen so far)
Back to the delegate argument you being up – delegates change votes at the convention along with the superdelegates just not in great number. Usually it does not matter because the races are not close. This time it matters. There are 300 or so uncommitted superdelegates plus another 76 that can be appointed by state committees. 4% difference is much less than that number so either candidate could get the nomination if the remaining contests are even splits. More than likely, the race as projected is going to tighten in the delegate count. Which means even fewer delegates can tip the nomination. Either way, this is going to the convention and will likely be multi-balloted as it should be in order for either candidate to get half the available delegates needed for the nomination. With the pending court decisions possibly bringing MI and FL back in, the race tips to Clinton before the convention.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

Well, excuse me your imperial majesty!!! Both the Democrats and the Republicans decided BEFORE the primary elections in Florida and Michigan what they would do regarding deligates from those states if the elections were held in violation of pary rules. The Republicans decided to halve the size of the delegations as punishment. The Democrats decided not to sit the delegations at their convention as punishment…
This was WELL KNOWN and ACKNOWLEDGED by all of the candidates at the time. Her Royal Calamity (HRC) should stop whining about her party failing to decide what to do – THEY ALREADY DID DECIDE and now she wants a different verdict!!!
So she now wants to complain about voters being disenfranchised??? Can she tell us how many Democrats voluntarily disenfranchised themselves because they knew BEFORE the election that their votes would NOT count so they didn’t bother to vote??? How many??? One million??? Two million???
Her argument is absurd!!! Mind you I am not an Obama supporter and I ain’t thrilled with McCain either. Frankly, I see the US having to suffer through another presidential election where the voters are forced to choose between the lesser of two evils…
Aren’t any of you tired of voting “against” someone as opposed to voting “for” someone??? Wouldn’t it be WONDERFUL if “None of the Above” were added to the ballots???

Posted by: TommyReb | April 11, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

BMR – Obama spent 800K to buy 34 superdelegate votes. This is documented by legitimate sources. Buying votes is fine for rich liberals but is not viewed favorably by most Americans. I guess you are one of the rich who think it is ok.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Same here – my puppy is lying by the computer signaling to me that it is time for her to go to bed, too. I agree with BMR – it has been enjoyable talking with sane folks who do not spew hate and bigotry. Supporting opposing candidates with valid debate is stimulating – and I echo BMR’s sentiments – we are all in this together regardless of which candidate we favor. McSame would be disastorous for our country.

Posted by: sandy | April 11, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

She actually agreed not to campaign in those states. None of the candidates signed a contract agreeing that the delegates wouldn’t be sat. The DNC decided that. She was aware of the decision .( and who can say she agreed…I think it was more of a strategy, if we need them use them later kinda thing) Since the race was figured to be over around super tuesday either with Obama winning or Clinton, and especially since she won OH and T x when she was expected to lose one, the delegates are imperative to the nomination. Florida mostly. The Republican govt. there refused to let the Dems have the primary on the date set by the DNC. If Obama could win the nomination with just the votes in FL, and he won that state by 12% or more like she did, he would be doing the same thing. Everyone knew that if it came to it this would be an important strategy. No one publicly said “these votes should not count at the convention.” Who would agree to that?? No one. With a race this close every vote needs to be counted. for either candidate. If it was Obama’s way to secure the nomination I would have to agree with his opinion. There were earlier states that moved up their primary or caucus, yet they suffered no penalites. The bottom line is, as a party, the Democrats have a responsibility to make sure every voice is heard. Period. No matter what it has to say. If we don’t we are not a party. We are exclusive.

Posted by: Geneva | April 11, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Yes the race should be competitive – it is historic with the two possible candidates being different demographically than ever in this country. When I saw who was running, I knew right off the bat none of them had a chance except for Clinton and Obama because Obama benefitted from his race. Before you call me a racist, this is completely supported by voting patterns and was affirmed by Obama that he has benefitted from his race. Has Clinton benefitted from her gender? Overall, no. This is also well documented by the media itself as well as voting patterns. They propped each other up throughout the debates until it got down to just the two of them. If you think this wasnt planned I think you havent read between the lines.
Yes you are correct – the one who wins the nomination with ALL the electorate considered (including MI and FL) with the least amount invested will have the highest ROI. If Obama gets the nomination without considering MI and FL then he will have stolen the nomination and not have a mandate from the electorate.
Subsequently, the nominee’s goal is really to win in Nov. Without a mandate from the democratic electorate against 44% of Independent voters in this country (most do not participate in primaries), winning in Nov is not likely. This goes back to the electability argument without party unity. Clinton is more electable by sheer numbers she has already. Additionally, the pollsters and the RNC admit a significant number of female Republican voters are expected to crossover if Clinton has the nomination. There arent enough identity voters in the Rep electorate to add to Obama if he has the nomination. He cant win without her supporters and he wont get them without MI, FL, and her.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

BMR: 130 delegate lead with an addition 300 superdelegates yet to decide, and PA being 188 delegates, Indiana, Oregon, Montana, West Virginia, North Carolina, Puerto Rico etc. left yet to vote…Being less than 100,000 in popular vote out of 26,000,000 votes is in FACT a 1% difference.
Now, because he is ahead by 100+ delegates, and she would have to win an overwhelming % in every remaining state, he is 40% more likely than her to win the nomination. STATISCALLY. Now, If the rule was that the superdelegates had to vote according to how their state voted, Kerry, Richardson, Kennedy, and etc. would have to change their vote. Lucky for Obama that is not the case. Unless the remaining states decide the nomination, the superdelegates will.
This is the tricky part…most of the superdelegates reside in states that Clinton won, since more delegates are found in states with a bigger populus. IF…Florida is sat, which Dean said this week he is confident they will, the delegate lead will be even smaller not to mention the popular vote shifts. Now you have Senator Clinton with the popular vote and wins in the big states. Let’s remember the DNC said it will not overturn the decision of the voters.
We all know they cannot get to the number of delegates required to secure the nomination. Since that is an statistical impossibility, it will require other factors in determining the nominee. If the supers nominate Clinton while they would be overturning the popular vote of the nation ( the one percent difference) BUT they would NOT be overturning the popular vote of their residing states. Vice Versa for Obama.
Surely you can see why she is staying in.
We just need to be prepared with who the nominee is. Obama, or Clinton. I am fine with either one. Literally anything can happen at the convention. And either way…they both deserve it. With the difference being so small…

Posted by: Geneva | April 11, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

God I love her!!!
She just says it like it is….
No waffling.

Posted by: Maddie | April 11, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Dean: Apparently misogyny doesn’t exist. According to many people it is a figment of the woman mind to imagine such a thing. ; )

Posted by: Geneva | April 11, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

Sorry i don’t mean to be so harsh, but blogging about malcom x is a scare tactic, and there are a lot of people here blogging hate v. opinion. There was someone named momo just as bad, obama isn’t about separation and division, but working together. And attaching all of these links that spread rumors and paranoia just divides America.

Posted by: lynette | April 11, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

Lynette: Honestly I think all of the candidates want the country to work together. Unity isn’t only Obama’s to claim.

Posted by: Geneva | April 11, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

ding – that is simply not true… but i wont bother reposting what already exists on this thread… you can go back up and read if you like. BTW, i hope your chat name is referring to the character in the movie and is not being sexist and disrespectful of one of the greatest First Ladies in our history. If it is, please be an American and show some respect.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

There she goes again !
Hillary tells us that we are judged by those we associate with. And she would cast aspersions on Sen Obama – and declare him to be unfit for the presidency – because of his association with Pastor Wright.
Now she tells us that her even closer association with contrary, grubby Bill Clinton doesn’t matter – and it should not reflect adversely on her – and it would not affect her policies. Yes, she would have her cake and eat it too.
Why do we still bother with this sniper-fire dodger choke-full of tall tales?
Maybe a few more months may help Hilly, hubby Billy and little Chelsy come to grips with the pain of failure.

Posted by: chokora | April 11, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

The bottom line is that OBAMA is trying to say he has the ‘will of the people’.
You cant say that -but IGNORE Florida and Michigan.
Obama cant get 2024 delegates either. You Obama lovers KNOW whats really going on here, but since it isnt YOUR candidate getting SHAFTED in the media the entire time, no problem.
This is why the Clinton supporters will stay home or vote for Mc Cain.
We will NEVER let the media rig the election.

Posted by: tomdavie | April 11, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

Well, it’s very obvious the DNC party is all whacked up. Democrats can’t resolve basic voting issue so how much more if america will put them in charge for the next 4 years? Even worse, if democrats nominates Obama for General, they will lose the election from McCain.
DNC and Obama are both bad news for our country. If Obama is the nominee, this independent will vote for McCain.

Posted by: James Recto, Independent | April 11, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am

geneva you are right and i am sure hillary would not approve of so much neg. Divisive blogging going on either, just bc i support obama doesn’t mean I believe yClinton supporters are blogging hate messages, but the tone of some of these blogs serve no purpose except to promote hatred.
Dcvoter, obama graduated top of his class from Harvard right? Could have gone any where right? Instead he chose civil service in one of the poorest comunities. Have you been to south Chicago? If you have spent more than 30 seconds there you would not call Obama an elitest. The Clintons gave to their own charities, now that’s really branching out, you need to take off those blinders or better yet go and visit South Chicago, elite is nowhere in that community, but nice try.
And yes, blogging about Malcon x IS a scare tactic, he’s been dead for a long time…let it go.
Finally if bloggers have to go article to article dishing out hate and terrorist rhetoric then they have other issues of no life, give or take which one.

Posted by: lynette | April 11, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am

There is no arguing with a liar. This campaign if far less about Obama’s virtues than it is about not trusting the Clintons.
It’s hard to realize the candidate you want to win is not going to win. I understand that, but enough is enough guys.
Obama is evil only in the eyes of Clinton supporters. Clinton’s evil is apparant to all others. There is a difference. It’s called objectivity based opnions. I’m really happy she has let her true colors show in the campaign to remind us over and over why we don’t need her.

Posted by: Mark | April 11, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am

Geneva
succinct, statistical and superb

Posted by: kudos | April 11, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am

Hillary and Co, want every voice to be heard, but they want to ignor the fact that she is 700 000 votes behinde, want the Super Deligates to ignore Obamas lead in popular votes and select her in!!!( that’s not democracy, not election but selection) if this process has to be rounded up by selection, why all the trouble. She helped creat the super IDIOTS to favor her, but now it is disfavoring her and she cant handle it.
She some times thinks that she is in the White House where she can do just any thing.
This position of hers will come back to hount her. One standard is certain, whoever leads in popular votes will get the normination. No chance for rubbery period.

Posted by: kudos | April 11, 2008, 5:46 am 5:46 am

DCVoter I have read a lot of your post on a lot of websitesand you post a lot of information. But you tend to parse the truth. Im a Republican, Minority fiscal beliefs. Your biggest flaw is the one your not seeing, Republicans are a more march in step group, by our very nature. We still remeber her calling us the Great Right wing conspiracy. We Have a long list of truths, half truths, and lies that she and her husband (remember two for one :) )have spoken. Her positives among Republicans are in the high twenties. Fact are 527′s are much better than the left,if we cant crush a candidate with that much luggage we deserve to lose. even with the odds stacked against us. I have always felt that she was one of us and I would like to thank you personally for all the compliments that she gave Mccain that we are going to run against her if she get the nomination.

Posted by: David CO. | April 11, 2008, 5:50 am 5:50 am

BKMC Obama needs somebody to tell him what to do, but he still remains the most articulate among the 3 contestants

Posted by: Stepen | April 11, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am

Hillary and Co, want every voice to be heard, but they want to ignor the fact that she is 700 000 votes behinde, she wants the Super Deligates to ignore Obamas lead in popular votes and select her in!!!( that’s not democracy, not election but selection)She is trying to prove the she is electable when she wants the normination by selection. Obama is the electable candidate so far it stays so till the electorates turn it. If this process has to be rounded up by selection, why all the trouble. She helped creat the Deligated Super IDIOTS to favor her, but now it is disfavoring her and she cant handle it.
She some times thinks that she is in the White House where she can do just any thing.
This position of hers will come back to hount her. One standard is certain, whoever leads in popular votes will get the normination. No chance for rubbery period!!!

Posted by: kudos | April 11, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am

The thing about OBAMA is that he has all these powerful people behind him for one (maybe two) reasons; 1) he’s flashy and all the cool kids are behind him 2) by giving him support, he will be in their debt and service and essentially be puppet.
It’s pathetic this man got so far. I wish more people would come-to from their Obama worship.
God bless Obama? Nah, nah, nah…

Posted by: Tom | April 11, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am

The undecided Super Idiots, should know that if every voice should count, that will be the bases for decision. They better see the 700 000 lead of the Obama campaign and join the Wagon. They should not listen to what Hillary clinton RODMAN thinks and says. She is all over the place, says what ever she wants depending on what time of the day it is.You can hardly catch her on character.

Posted by: kudos | April 11, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am

What’s new? OB’s strategy is in line with his initial election to the Illinois senate.
Army of lawyers working to disqualify his opponents. Shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.

Posted by: Irked | April 11, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am

Bill Clinton, bless his heart, has more good sense about dealing with Colombia than either his wife or Obama.
It is so foolish and stupid to let labor union bosses dictate foreign policy for the Democratic party.
Hillary and Obama are supporting the forces of evil – Hugo Chavez and his anti-American rhetoric against Colombia.

Posted by: Lance | April 11, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am

I live in Michigan. I didn’t vote because we were told the delegates wouldn’t be seated. Many others did the same. And yet many others voted in the Republican primary. To now say these votes count would be fraud.

Posted by: Eric | April 11, 2008, 7:05 am 7:05 am

Pennsylvania people are not dumb. Obama is going to win the Democratic Primary.
Posted by: Fred 10 —————-
—————–
Well some of us aren’t dumb, those voting for Hillary.

Posted by: JG | April 11, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am

David CO – I am well aware Republicans are “in step” citizens and also well aware of the memory you may have of the right wing conspiracy comments. My posts have nothing to do with Republicans in that I do not expect you to support anyone but McCain. Senator Clinton stood by her husband in making that comment believing he was being truthful and was likely defending him as any good spouse should until they find out otherwise. I understand her and I dont expect you to since you are a Republican. Thats ok with me it is your right. However, she has successfully beaten the RNC machine for the past 29 years they have been after her and $40M of taxpayers money later (wasted) at the direction of the RNC mahcine, she has done nothing illegal. I dont care about Bill’s shenanigans and it is her right to honor her marital vows even when he did not. All her negatives are well known… there is nothing new that any 527 can bring out that will be a surprise. Get this… Clinton still maintains support from core democrats and the “female republican” voting block has been MIA. Could it be that your gals are abandoning you?

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am

Eric – MI had record turnouts in the Democratic primary. Just because you chose not to bother to vote is no reason to disenfranchise those who did vote is it? Are you an American or just someone who only cares about your own vote?

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

I can’t believe for the first time in my voting life I am probably not going to vote in this election and it sickens me. What has happened to the country I have loved and defended for my 60 years? I hear this candidate Obama talking about unity and all I read here is hate and division. Is this the what the country has to look forward to for the next 4 years? Talk about change, this country sure has changed already. My wife and I honestly feel the DNC has lost it’s direction with this election and may have sown the seeds of discontent for many of it’s voting constituants. No, I don’t have the answer, only know what I feel inside.

Posted by: Tim | April 11, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

kudos.
Where do you see he has a 700,0000 vote lead. If you look on the main page of ABC it’s 102,768.

Posted by: JG | April 11, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am

Senator Clinton, you are now out of the 7th grade. “do-overs” are no longer an option. Please think of the tarnish you are putting on all the other women in politics by continuing to whine. It seems that you may be actually dragging women backwards. Please just move on to the next issue and get over it. It would be in your best interest in my opinion.

Posted by: Jeanette Peterson | April 11, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

Jeanette Peterson,
She is not dragging women backwards and she isn’t whining. How would you like YOUR vote not to count because of the stupidity of your legislators?
I am glad she if fighting to get them to count these votes. It shows me that she cares that people do have a say in who their President is going to be. Obama doesn’t want them counted because then he may lose the nomination and not be crowned Messiah of the US.

Posted by: JG | April 11, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

I find it childish for some Hillary and Obama supporters to say they will support McCain if their candidate does not win. If you like McCain’s policies and think he is the best candidate then by all means give him your vote. If on the other hand you don’t think much of his policies do the right thing and support whoever your party elects as the nominee. Being a neutral observer it seems like the mature approach.

Posted by: TwineUK | April 11, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Why if Obama is the nominee should we vote for somebody who we know will not be good for this country.
I’d rather not vote for him or McCain. I once thought about voting for McCain, but if Hillary is not the nominee I will not vote or I will write her in.

Posted by: JG | April 11, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

TwineUK – you might not be aware of this but many Clinton supporters are Independents who vote for the person not the party. I am one of them… I support Clinton first and McCain second only because Obama is not qualified to be CIC or chief executive. McCain wont be much of an executive but he has more experience relating to CIC and can be controlled by the dem congress. He already has policies that are in agreement with some of Clinton proposals. McCain is a moderate who is only pandering to the conservative wing of his party. May dems are fed up with the DNC because of the MI and FL issue not because of the tight race. The polls show only a minority of dems will vote dem no matter what. Times have changed… if the credentials committee doesnt fix it, the courts will have the opportunity to do so… if it does not get fixed and the nominee does not have a mandate… it just might be time for a new moderate party of the people regardless of demographics.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Westcoast mes……You failed to mention that the polls also show Hillary 10% behind McCain in the National Polls on MSNBC! If you are going to tell it tell it all. But that is the typical Hillary tactics.

Posted by: Emilianna | April 11, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

The democrat party DID decide what to do about MI and FL. They decided that if those states moved their votes up, they would not count. She agreed to it. Now that she’s down, she wants to count votes in a state where her opponent wasn’t even on the ballot.
How about we let people vote three months after the election? Six months? I mean, if not, we’d be disenfranchising them, right?
Anything to win, ethics be damned.

Posted by: Jackson Dell'Abate | April 11, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Emilianna….
The MSM since the begininng of this election has been posting nothing but negatives about Clinton. That’s funny because I read in several places that she is only a point or two behind him in the polls and Obama is now dead even with him. Here is one of them.
From Real Clear Politics:
National AP-Ipsos Poll
Dems: Obama 46, Clinton 43
General: Obama 45, McCain 45
General: Clinton 48, McCain 45

Posted by: JG | April 11, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Fellow democrats. Let’s stick to the issues and not insult each other’s intelligence.
The people who are saying that Hillary has benefited from Rush Limbaugh and Ann Colter saying “vote for Hillary” are missing the point. When they speak, they know that some democrats will vote for Obama just to show Rush and Ann. They are also the ones who say that Florida violated the rules. Yes they did. The primary voting date was set by the republican congress and signed by the republican governor. How did the democrats violate the DNC rules. Anybody in the DNC that voted to not count Florida did exactly what the republican party planned for them to do. In other words, the democratic party is doing the dirty work that the republicans wanted them to do.
Wake up and smell the coffee. The republicans want Obama to be the nominee not Clinton. This is where the republicans are voting in the crossover.
Clinton 08

Posted by: Paul from Texas | April 11, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Hillary will continue to spin this fairy tale until the common voter forgets the truth. That’s how Bill taught her to lie. It’s the same with most of her accusations, Bosnia, the energy bill, Michigan & Florida. Although, with the states, if she can get them to believe that it’s Obama’s fault, as opposed to the state DNC morons, they may focus on Obama and vote for Hillary in spite. That may be what she’s counting on.
(what an evil web we weave . . . .)

Posted by: DAVID NH | April 11, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

We all know that the bulk of the Clinton’s “declared” 109 million dollar fortune comes from speeches given to lobbysts. And we also know that lobbysts do not give unless they get something in return… it is a fact. Now we have Hillary who had this to say about Obama in Ohio “If you come to Ohio and both give speeches that are very critical of NAFTA and you send out misleading and false information about my position regarding NAFTA and then we find out that your chief economic adviser has gone to a foreign government and basically done the old ‘wink, wink, don’t pay attention, this is just political rhetoric.’ I think that raises serious questions” She also told reporters that if her name were to substitute for Obama’s name in this story that she would have received greater scrutiny. “Just ask yourself,” Clinton said. “If some of my advisers had been having private meetings with foreign governments basically saying ‘ignore what I’m saying because its only political rhetoric,’ I think it raises serious questions.” How can she, with a straight face stand up and declare that she does not take money from lobbysts, after dropping 800,000 dollars from the Columbians into her joint bank account…?
ARRRRRRGGHHHH… that demonic laugh of her’s is her way of sticking her finger in our eyes, and calling us stupid for not seeing her for the fake that she is.

Posted by: Julio | April 11, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

For the record the voting patterns suggest that Obama can win the general election without FL, MI or PA. Some of you folks just don’t do your homework or you are just intentionally misrepresenting the facts.
It’s Hillary that can’t win without FL, MI or PA but it’s in the PRIMARY.

Posted by: Elijah112668 | April 11, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

so full of it. the democratic party did decide what to do with FL and MI’s delegates – they stripped them. hillary agreed to that back when she thought she was a shoo-in. she’d be sympathetic if she’d fought harder before the votes to have them count.

Posted by: steve va | April 11, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

The two faces of Hillary…when she’s ahead and when she’s behind. Her ability to put a spin on things is really remarkable.

Posted by: Brianna | April 11, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Polls change daily as opinions change daily. The margin of error in the AP-Ipsos polls is 3.6% for registered voters. The more important statistic can be seen in the trends. Clinton is gaining ground again and Obama is losing ground. What will it be tomorrow? Who knows. Based on the trends over the past month, Obama peaked which does not look good for him. Statistically, the race is tied nationally with Clinton projected at a slight advantage by this one poll for now. The polls are also showing Clinton is gaining again in PA and IN. To see the polls and the trends, try looking at the latest polls at RCP polls. The general polls average things back more than a year so they are not good indicators since there have been major changes in the race that are indicating buyer’s remorse in some places after the recent Obama scandals. Both candidates seemed to have weathered some storms but the numbers are indicating Obama did not weather them quite as well as he hoped. The delegate count is currently less than 4% difference and the popular vote is being reported differently on different sites. The popular vote has no official place in the nomination process but the MI and FL elections were certified so we do know the will of the voters in those states. Delegates can consider the popular vote if they want to and should if they are superdelegates.

Posted by: DCVoter | April 11, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

DC voter… You said it white men and white women are not voting for Obama. When I heard a black man was running for President I knew race would bve the main focus of the race. I hope white people will wake up and get beyond race and vote for who will be the best CIC. I saw a survey do by newsmax and they asked 27,000 whites if Obama race had anything to do with them not voting for him and 62% said yes. I am very hurt by that because as blacks know racism is very much alive today!

Posted by: Emilianna | April 11, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

Seah…Your preception of Obama’s speech is all the way off base. It just amazes me how you people come up with your own scenerio of what a person is saying. Obama did not say those terrible thing Rev. Wright did, and it does matter who said them. You people have a problem with sterotyping and we are really sick of all the BS. Hillary lies and you people just dismiss it but you hold on to everything negative about Obama. DOUBLE STANDARDS as usual.

Posted by: Emilianna | April 11, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

As a white university professor, I, along with my children and grandchildren, am honored and privileged to be part of this great history in the making and vote for Sen. Obama. Now, will America rise to the occasion and embrace this great change and truly unite, showing the world that ONLY in America this can happen, and that it really is the land of the free? Or, will those whose better judgement is clouded by petty prejudices and misconceptions continue the divisive tradition of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’, propagated by those politicians who firmly believe in their politics of divide and rule and public deception?

Posted by: unite | April 11, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Obama will win dems race . will lose general. he will be destroyed in the general. hillary is tougher will fair better against McCain.of all the of them she is the fighter.

Posted by: blazer8914 | April 11, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Tom…That was a terrible thing to say about God Bless Obama. If you read the port you will see that he says God Bless America also. I pray that God will Bless each and everyone of us. We need it with all this crap being written. Obama is a man and not a animal, this is what is wrong with America today and always has been wether you want to admit it or not!

Posted by: Emilianna | April 11, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

here in pa obama will lose.don’t let the polls fool you

Posted by: blazer8914 | April 11, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

let obama win it wont last long, look at all the other black leaders they always self implode, they just cannot handle power and go to the dark side. its going to be funny to watch obama do the same..God help us

Posted by: james | April 11, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

blazer8914….Don’t under estimate Obama and his supporters. I live in In and My family and I am on his canvass tem and we are out there comparing him and Hillary and I tell you the progress that has been made is wonderful. I have convenieced many Hillary supporters that Obama will be the best CIC and I used facts not lies and scare tatics. Obama 08******

Posted by: Emilianna | April 11, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

emilianna i live in pa.i will not support obama if he wins. i will for the first time in my 41 years of voting go with the other party and i know alot of other people who are saying the same

Posted by: blazer8914 | April 11, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

I agree with Charles. Hill needs to be called on the fact that when she was ahead by double digits she agreed that Florida and Michigan wouldn’t count. She’s quoted as saying “they won’t matter!” Look at her interview with Katie Couric back in the fall–she refused to even toy with the possibility that she wouldn’t be the nominee!! Hillary has fair weather opinions.

Posted by: jAmy | April 11, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Sen. Clinton doesn’t care who she offends… She has now thrown the Democratic Party under the bus by comparing her party to the republican party…
Sen. Obama has said repeatedly… the votes will count and the delegates will be seat from Fl and MI. He and his advisers opposed the delegates be split 50/50. That’s a completely fair resolution. It doesn’t give either canididate an advantage and it allows the delegate to be seated… Sen. Clinton and her advisers won’t agree to a fair settlement… They want the delegates to be seated in a way to give her losing campaign an advantage. That would be unfair… and DNC knows it would be unfair… and Sen. Clinton continues to make false accusations that Sen. Obama is at fault… when clearly he’s not…
Sen. Clinton is truly starting to unravel… After May 6th… She will probably lose NC and IN and this thing will be over…

Posted by: Bruce | April 11, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Everyones vote should count.
It is as simple as that.
If anyone is left out it is a travisty.
Doesn’t matter why they where left out.
Everyone counts not just the ones that the people in power say should count.
I know how we can prevent states from trying to enter dates before the deadlines.
Let the legislators know they will no longer have a job if they do.
The people that passed the bill for setting the primary dates stillhave their jobs that pay very well.
Punish the polictians for their poor judgement not the people.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

HE CAN’T STAND UP AGAINST McCAIN AS FAR AS BEING PATRIOTIC AND EXPERIENCED. THEY ARE GOING TO HIT HIM HARD. HOW CAN YOU BE PRESIDENT AND BE FRIENDS WITH SOMEONE WHO BOMBED THE PENTAGON AND SOMEONE WHO HAS HATE SPEECH AGAINST AMERICA. THIS IS WHERE THEY WILL GO AND YOU KNOW IT

Posted by: blazer8914 | April 11, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Clinton supporters will never support Obama. He wants to disenfranchise voters to win an election??? A majority of whites and hispanics support Hillary. That is a fact! Check the polling data.

Posted by: HispanicVoter | April 11, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

To those saying Hillary stand to have the nomination “stolen” from her because of the media:
How dare you!! Obama has earned every vote he’s received. He’s ahead in delegates and popular vote and that’s the way our country operates. I didn’t vote for Obama in my state’s primary because I liked what the media had to say. I voted for him because I believe he has some things to offer this nation that neither Clinton or any Republican does: hope, change and honor.
As for bad press: it comes with the territory. Obama received way more negative press for Reverend Wright than Hillary did for her sniper fire lie.

Posted by: Amy | April 11, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Splitting the vote 50/50 is not a fair resolution. The people will not be represented by that option.
Flat out rediclas comment.
If it is split even they why count them at all.
Obserd line of thinking.
Face the truth. Obama doesn’t want a to try and compete in those states.
He had a chance to show the people he means what he says about the will of the people with MI and did not follow through with what he says he is all about.
He is a fraud!
He wants to be President and it has nothing to do with the will of the people.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Well, she is struggling for Fland Mi saying- every vote should count. And then, brining those votes to convention she will(just needs) to say to superdelegate: I am the best, Vote for me and do NOT count any vote. People, did You get that – her manipulations with You.
It matters for her- which moment too count You and which NOT to count.
There is the World and there are Clintons, against the World.

Posted by: Linda,Fl | April 11, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

I’ve never been tortured. I have no idea what I’d do. Of course, I’d like to think that I could resist or at least commit suicide before giving up information. Odds are, however, that I’d crack. Most people do. And so did McCain. “I am a black criminal and I have performed the deeds of an air pirate,” McCain wrote in his confession. “I almost died and the Vietnamese people saved my life, thanks to the doctors.”
It wasn’t the first time McCain broke under pressure. After his capture, wrote the Republic, “He was placed in a cell and told he would not receive any medical treatment until he gave military information. McCain refused and was beaten unconscious. On the fourth day, two guards entered McCain’s cell. One pulled back the blanket to reveal McCain’s injured knee. ‘It was about the size, shape and color of a football,’ McCain recalled. Fearful of blood poisoning that would lead to death, McCain told his captors he would talk if they took him to a hospital.”
McCain has always been truthful about his behavior as a POW, but he has been more than willing to allow others to lie on his behalf. “A proven leader, and a man of integrity,” The New York Post says, and he’s happy to take it. “All he had to do was denounce his country. He refused…” Not really. He did denounce his country. But he didn’t demand a retraction.
It’s the old tragic flaw: McCain knows what he ought to do. He starts to do the right thing. But John McCain is a weak man who puts his career goals first.
this is a hero—the dead are our heros

Posted by: james | April 11, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

blazer8914….You know being an African American women I have never had someone that I whole heartedly wanted as a President. I had no choice but to vote for the next best person because there has always been whites only. So, with that said I have been voting for whoever whites put as the nom. But you know what we blacks are use to this crap. When it all boils down to it people just can not except that a black man HAS COME THIS FAR. IF HE DOES NOT WIN THEN WE CAN SAY THAT WE HAVE MOVED A TAD BIT CLOSER TO EQUALITY. Finally blacks have someone that they are proud to vote for and this is wonderful no matter how you see it, we see it as a step p.

Posted by: Emilianna | April 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Emilianna,
It has nothing to do with his skin.
He is a lier and a fraud.
Your attitude as a black person does not help his cause.
You sound like his pastor Wright.
Never mind all the good things white people have done for blacks.
White people have been force fed crap by people in power too, except we can’t use the color of our skin to make an argument. Stop lumping all whites and blacks together in groups and speak for yourself as and American istead of putting your color in front of it.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

DC Voter…Do you own a housae? I do and I put my family first, above all. You speak like Obama should have not bought a home for his family and donated his money to charity. Get a grip! he has a family and family first! But I guess you forgott that the Clinton’s live free of rent for many many years. I donate money to many charities but I pay my bills first! First!

Posted by: Emilianna | April 11, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Fire Destroys Clinton’s Campaign Office In Indiana, Fire Marshals Investigating
Where has this been tried beore? Event staged by the Clintons to make it look like a right wing conspiracy, or victim of black racists in favor of Obama. Hint – This has staged before by more notorious personalities.

Posted by: conspiracy | April 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Hillary is right.
If the dems want to lose in november…AGAIN…nominate Obama.
If the superdelegates aren’t there to steer the selection process toward a WINNER in a contest which is too close for either candidate to win outright…
GET OUT OF THE WAY.
Either way the ELECTORAL COLLEGE determines the next president.
If the DEMOCRATS can’t run a nominating process correctly…
No wonder the voters always send them down to defeat AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.

Posted by: Soon to be Republicans | April 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

I am totally amazed at people who continue to make excuses for Sen. Clinton failures. She has exposed herself over and over again, and her supporters are in complete denial about her inexcusable behavior and totally irresponsible statements. Her supporters are willing to shoot themselves in the foot, just to despite someone from their own political party. Don’t they really want four more years of Bush policies? Do they really want to soldiers in Iraq for 10, 20 or more years, because that’s what they are going to get by voting for Sen. McCain. Their blind bias and lack of honestly looking at Sen. Clinton mistakes and misdeeds is a dangerous mindset…
Are people still that ignorant in this country? Is racism and sexism that deep? Is our hatred so blind we can see that truth?
Sen. Clinton is a flawed candidate not because she is a woman… She is a flawed candidate because of her poor character, poor decisions, poor leadership… The attitude she publicly displays completely turns off voters and more importantly… super delegates… Sen. Clinton is shooting herself in the foot, just like her supporters…
I have criticisms about Sen. Obama, however, I’m honest about his character, and his potential leadership. He hasn’t done everything right, however, I don’t see a complete blind bias, in people that support him.
I look at both of these candidates and can clearly see differences in their character, their behavior, public statements, how the re-act to their mistakes and more importantly, how they have run their campaigns…
I’m voting for Sen. Obama because he has demonstrated he is a person to lead our country. I’m voting for Sen. Obama because I believe he can bring about change our country needs. I’m voting for Sen. Obama because of human qualities I admire in people. I see him as a good person… not a perfect person… His character and attitude far exceeds the character and attitude is see in Sen. Clinton…
That’s not blind bias… That’s the real Truth…

Posted by: Bruce | April 11, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Actually, Hillary has every right to question these two states because frankly we the citizens of Florida are doing that, and someone needs to speak out for us. I understand exactly why this decision was made, and how both parties would have to agree then. Hindsight is 20.20. But give this woman a break. We are in the most historically close election, and you have Obama supporters being like “rules are rules.” Come on! That isn’t hope or transformation–thats POLITICS. If you have the ability to get closer to truth, real truth, not truth based on human manipulation, then you seek it out as much as possible. I know both of these candidates are using this to their advantage. But I also know my vote should count, and if not, let me recast my same vote, and have it count then.

Posted by: Emily | April 11, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

It seems to me that Obama preaches the will of the people yet he and his supporters don’t seem to want that.
Go ahead and hide behind the rules.
Bush made a rule to torture people,
I bet you want that rule reversed.
People act like these States committed a horrible crime and need to be punished. How can we ever have order if we don’t punish these states.
Sometimes rules are bad rules and people don’t realize it until they start executing the rule.
This was a bad response to the problem and the Party is suffering from it.
They need to fix it, not just try to run from it.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Bruce,
Obama has demonstrated time and time again in the short period he has been in the limelight they he is not trustworthy.
He has lied and decieved over and over.
If you can’t see that you are blinded by bias.
He is a typical politician when he has sold you a bunch of bull to the contrary.
I hear his supporters saying things like. It is common for politicians to do this and that.
He is saying he is going to change politics and let the will of the people be heard, and as always he actions have shown the complete opposite of that.
You keep living in his words of dreams instead of his actions in reality.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

This is real cute. The DNC is sticking to the rules. Hillary agreed to the rules and now wants them changed and has dedicated her campaign to undermining these rules now that it is to her benefit. Puts political pressure on the comittee and doesn’t understand why they aren’t changing just for her and she has the gaul to say they don’t know what they are doing. Frutration, I am frustrated with her and her stomping on anyone in her way, to the detriment of the Demoratic party and the country. She needs to look at her role in this mess. Of course he is not open to introspection.

Posted by: goodwins | April 11, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Disenfranchising American voters─ no other person knows more about this subject than our former Vice-President Al Gore. It is ironic we just witnessed the same thing happen to Hillary Clinton, that happened to Al Gore in November 2000. And as usual the whole Washington media establishment was silent, more or less abandoning their responsibility of safeguarding the rights of the people to vote in a democracy such as ours; neglecting their role to say the obvious. The fact that Sen. Obama’s lawyers had successfully block the re-voting of Michigan and Florida. Mr. David Brooks points out in his (3-25-08) column in The New York Times “Obama lawyers successfully prevented re-votes in Florida and Michigan.” This important statement was buried in otherwise as usual pro Obama piece that sees things for Sen. Obama’s favor in an obviously stalemated Democratic primary contest. But what disturbed me was the fact that David Brooks and other political writes in the media establishment seemed to have little regard for democratic process? I amazed that the preventing Michigan and Florida vote thus disfranchising millions of Democratic voters reminds me of the Supreme Court Handing over Florida vote to George Bush. In this new era of new politics that’s promised by Sen. Obama, can this really happen, or is this politics as usual– circa Florida 2000? The more Sen. Obama strains to speak of his new era of politics in America, less and less of it seemed real. Sen. Obama should practice what he preaches so blatantly and the presidential primary campaign is a good place to start…I think Al Gore should endorse Hilly Clinton.

Posted by: charleschaplin | April 11, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Why do you people have a problem with black leaders? Blacks have tolerated your leaders for hundreds of years. It’s time for us blacks to move forward. We are not going away and we are stronger than ever and getting stronger everyday. Love my Race, Love my country, Hate the racism that binds our country.

Posted by: Emilianna | April 11, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Hillary voted for the bill that took us to war when over 70% of the people thought it was a good idea.
Sounds like action taken for the will of the people to me.
Obama was against the will of the people, but didn’t have a vote to answer for.
Now in MI and FL Hillary is trying to have the will of the people heard and Obama is against it.
He critisizes her for acting on the will of the people.
He campaigns he is for the will of the people.
He has a chance to have the will of the people heard in MI and FL and doesn’t act on it.
Hmmmmm!
He is a missleader not a leader.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

It’s clear that Howard Dean must go—his complete incompetency and lack of strategic vision, which he so often takes credit for, was fatally flawed in perhaps what is the most critical and OBVIOUS issue ever for the Dems. Pathetic. Hillary and Obama should not be the ones to decide, it should be DNC leaders that make this right. It also is a lack of DNC backbone and their fear of losing some voters that has made this decison, when instead it should be the fear of losing TWO KEY STATES IN NOV. due to negligence that should be the worry. Gee–let’all figure out how best to lose an election and put Dean in charge to make it happen! Go Howard!

Posted by: swoosie | April 11, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Emilianna: What’s with this YOU people? I didn’t vote for Obama because he was black, it was because he lacks experience. Sorry, but living in Indonesia, having African relatives, and traveling to Pakistan does not equate to Foreign Policy experience. Goodness, I’ve been to Canada can I be the VP. Give people some credit that possibly their vote was for something other than race. It can happen.

Posted by: Merv | April 11, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

While the rules prohibited campaigning in Florida, the fact is Obama was fresh off his big win in S. Carolina and he’d just gotten all that press about the Kennedy endorsements. I think they have t.v. in Florida – all of this was widely covered.
The point is he still couldn’t win in Florida.
The most important point though is the DNC played hardball – stupidly I would add and have put themselves in a corner. Do democrats really want to be known as the party that disenfranchises voters?
It’s bad enough that the DNC may have to explain how caucus wins in many of those states where Obama won – will not translate into Democratic wins in November if Obama manages (hope to God he doesn’t) to get the nomination. Caucuses freeze out large numbers of voters – the elderly, families with children, the disabled – who can’t spend hours chatting with neighbors about their SUV’s, McMansions, etc.

Posted by: morningside | April 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Well, excuse me your imperial majesty!!! Both the Democrats and the Republicans decided BEFORE the primary elections in Florida and Michigan what they would do regarding deligates from those states if the elections were held in violation of pary rules. The Republicans decided to halve the size of the delegations from those states as punishment. The Democrats decided not to allow the seating of the delegations at their convention as punishment…
It doesn’t matter whether or not it was a Republican led legislature that forced the early votes – the Democrats could have simply done what the Republicans did and halve the size of the delegations. However, the Democrats decided to impose a “death penalty.” As a result, NO candidates campaigned in those states!!!
This was WELL KNOWN and ACKNOWLEDGED by all of the candidates at the time. Her Royal Calamity (HRC) should stop whining about her party failing to decide what to do – THEY ALREADY DID DECIDE and now she wants a different verdict!!!
She now expresses concern about the voters in Florida and Michigan being disenfranchised. Can she tell us how many Democrats voluntarily disenfranchised themselves because they knew BEFORE the election that their votes would NOT count so they didn’t bother to vote??? How many??? One million??? Two million??? Pick a number, any number…
Her argument is absurd!!! Mind you I am not an Obama supporter and I ain’t thrilled with McCain either. Frankly, I see the US having to suffer through another presidential election where the voters are forced to choose between the lesser of two evils…
Aren’t any of you tired of voting “against” someone as opposed to voting “for” someone??? Wouldn’t it be WONDERFUL if “None of the Above” were added to the ballots???

Posted by: TommyReb | April 11, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Hey MOMO – Way to get out the vote – the white vote that is. Your statement “You white people have already lost. Obama will win because it is time for us to rise up against those who have been holding us down for so long” is proof that all of the racial problems in this country are not caused by white people and surely shows your ignorance of what is really at stake. On that note, regarding FL & MI, I never thought I would say this, but Al Sharpton finally said something I agreed with. He was saying that if the delegates were counted as they are, he would sue because there were an awful lot of the people that didn’t vote because they were told that their vote wouldn’t count anyway. Now Hillary wants to count them, but while she claims Obama doesn’t want peoples vote to count, the truth be told, he wants ALL of the votes to count, which would only be possible with a re-vote. Other than that, you Dems can’t even run a primary – how do you expect to run a country.

Posted by: BizBag | April 11, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Politics should not determine if votes should be counted or not.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

She just wants them because she is behind in the polls and could lose. If she was ahead and Obama wanted them reinstated, AFTER voting to leave them out, she would be screaming from the rafters.
Get over it sweetie and get on with the race.

Posted by: jc | April 11, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

If Dean backs Obama, we will know what really happened here.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Merv,
Foreign policy experience also doesn’t mean being a wife to the president or the governor of Texas for that matter hence not too many people with it, especially backwards closed minded people who get scared at the sight of foreigners or minorities for that matter, duh… Or they are so old the world has changed so much they can’ t even keep the different foreigners in each Country straight or they want to take over nations that didn’t asked to be saved.

Posted by: lynette | April 11, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Just like Obama supporters to live in the what if world. They don’t like reality too much or they would not be backing Obama.
Fact is voters are being left out and many people don’t care because it is not their vote and their candidate is winning.
They critisize a politician for doing what ever it takes to win, then don’t take action to have votes counted just to win.
Your just as bad as the politician.
I thought the misiah Obama was going to change all that way of thinking, instead he is encouraging it.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Donna Brazile has a hidden agenda and is not aptly representing the global interests of the DNC, just her own.
Be very wary of Brazile’s motives!

Posted by: br | April 11, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Lynette,
Compared to living in another country when you where 10yrs old it does.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Since they are married didn’t Hillary get $400,000 of the Columbia money?

Posted by: Sanity Man | April 11, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

blazer 8914, you are right about PA, because I remember very well how Ohio was growing up, very bigoted and prejudiced folks outside the large Metros, it is supposed to be like Ohio, yikes he will loose, there are many Southern and Eastern state that way too. Thank God for the educated unbias Americans in our Country, otherwise it would be like living in the 80′s. Some guy said earlier Obama and Michelle were affirmative action folks, thank God for affirmative action in the 80′s also because ignorant predudiced people ran around trying to block diversity, unity and minorities rights to equal opportunities and protection under the law, so yeah for affirmative action. If think this country has been open- minded and diverse in the past your head
is in the toilet.

Posted by: lynette | April 11, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Man I cant’ stand this woman. I really don’t need her to explain to me how the president sets policy or how many angles are on a damn pin. She can’t even run a campain let alone a contry. First she accepts the rules then she starts losing now they have to be changed. It’s like a spoiled little brat who wants more and more. I was going to vote for her too not anymore. Then finger pointing at Obama? Come on! last time I checked he didn’t make the DNC rules he’s just folllowing them. I think shes going to destroy this party on perpose just so she can run agian in 2012 wich I still won’t vote for her in. She’s totaly ruined my opinon of the Clintons!

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Caucuses are not fair for many reasons, this one is the worst!
Obama had a 182,482 lead after two caucuses (Colorado & Minnesota), but Hillary had a 228,781 lead in one primary (Ohio).
Obama gains +44 delegates, Hillary gains just +9 How lop-sided is that!

Posted by: GS | April 11, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Being able to critic’s one’s own policy and one’s own party is a good thing. It shows that people matters, not political party ideology! HIllary is right in venting her frustration with MI and FL. How in the world are the Dems going to win by disfranchising 2+ million Dem voters? all you have to do is turn about 15% of these folks off and there go MI and FL to the GOP. Wake up delusional people…you want real change? Change! and vote for HIllary.

Posted by: Richard | April 11, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

GS,
I agree with that last statement completly.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

If the DNC stuck to the rules….it would HAVE to throw out the Texas Caucuses. They were anything but even remotely by the rules.

Posted by: Texas Lil | April 11, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Change? From Hillary you got to be kidding. Hillary signed off on these rules along time ago! She is as much to blame for this as the rest of them. I’m not saying she isn’t right the votes should count I’m just saying she didn’t feel this way 15+ monthes ago when they all signed off on thisand it looked like she’d have a cake walk. Looks to me like typical “the boys are pickin on me agian” (in fake southern accent) crap.

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Obama advocates, let the people voices be heard, but then he and his supporters knock down a re-vote in Michigan and Florida. Obama states he is a uniter, but he wants only 48 states to decide the nominee. Obama and his supporters are buying an election, and all those big donors are expecting something in return. Talk about doing anything to win! With Obama , you get many questions unanswered! Electing him for President would be like re-electing Bush, promises, promises built on lies and distortion.

Posted by: jp,michigan | April 11, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Joe,
The campaign you say she cant’t run is running neck and neck with the most brilliant campaign in history according to all the media experts and Obama lovers.
Your point is not valid in any way.
Obama says he is going to change politics? How is he going to do that?
Is he going to do that by following all the rules? Is he going to fight to have rules changed when they are bad rules, because they are bad rules, or is he only going to fight for the rules that benifet him?

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

How dare you!! Obama has earned every vote he’s received. He’s ahead in delegates and popular vote and that’s the way our country operates. I didn’t vote for Obama in my state’s primary because I liked what the media had to say. I voted for him because I believe he has some things to offer this nation that neither Clinton or any Republican does: hope, change and honor.
Obama organizers “padded” the delegate vote in TEXAS. He got many delegates he DIDN’T earn. So much for Mr. Hope(HYPE) Change and Honor. I would have voted for him if he won the nomination, but NOT NOW. I saw it first hand.

Posted by: Texas Lil | April 11, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Tejasouth, I’d rather have a young educated open-minded prez. than ones my mother’s age who are too old to change old outdated beliefs, no offense to the other candidates.

Posted by: lynette | April 11, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Thats why she’s behind, not neck in neck also if she has the vison to see these rules were bad to begin with why did she sign off on them? She won’t win my state I know that. And anyway the strong women I know leave a cheating husband and save some self dignity not stay with him for a last name to keep political clout. I know that will make some of you mad but my opinon as a man is I have more respect for a woman that will leave a cheater than one who sticks around. All I’m saying is she just offers more of saying what people want to hear not what they need to hear.

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Oh yea after shes done lets vote Jeb Bush in that’ll make this country great too!

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Well, lets talk about how Obama’s Ad Falsely Claims He Does Not Accept Money From Oil Companies
Obama says “I’m Barack Obama and I don’t take money from oil companies or lobbyists and I wont let them block change anymore.”
Obama does not accept money from the oil industry? Wrong!

Posted by: mary | April 11, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Here is a woman concerned for the right to voter-are you kidding?
if she was concerned about right: how about the rights of these people she destroyed or used: Peter Paul, Susan McDouglal, Billy Dale abd Mr. Dales familiy were targeted on a personal level, Kathleen Willey-this is good she had PI on all the Bill’s women and threatened Kathleen Willey-why? not expose Bill on a sexual assault-that was Hillary’s orders-How about FALN-she could get a seat in NY if she had Bill Pardon these terrorist-Never mind that a Son’s father now has died in vain-the FALN killed his father, while he was eating at a restaurant in 1975-
wake up-HC is in it for herself

Posted by: Sophia | April 11, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Joe,
Saying what people want to hear is Obamas forte.
So you don’t have respect for a women that stays with a cheating husband, but you admire a man that stands behind a pastor that damns this country and white people.
Who people sleep with and why is their own business anyway.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Mary that is a true statement he doesn’t take money from oil companies. But he takes money from there employees.
I work in biotech I donated him money does that mean he’s taking money from biotech companies?

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Well, lets just talk about Obama’s close frindly relationships with Rev. Write (who is a anti-american & racist), Resko (who Obama denied he had a relationship at first but he then admitted later he is friends with him) & now the William Ayers (who bombed the pentagon and many more) they are friends. And how he played the race card on one of his pledge delegate supporter by saying it was “unaceptable” and was to step down for for a remark she made last week Saturday.
Come on!

Posted by: mary | April 11, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Joe,
The differnce in votes.
1%
The diffeence in delegates.
1%
I guess your redfining neck and neck.
He can’t win after all the states have decided either. Rememeber the rules.
They have to have met or exceeded the number of pledged delegates to win.
Obama camp and supporters say the delegates should vote the will of the people, but at least three major delegates are voting against their peoples choice.
They just want to win and will say and do anything to do it.
SAME OLD POLITICS, SAY WHAT EVER AND DO WHAT EVER.
What kind of change is that?

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

HILLARY SUPPORTED THE IDEA, and agreed Mi and Fl. should be stripped of their votes, right up until she started losing this election. Her top campaign guy, Ickes, was one of the people on the board who voted to approve stripping Fl. ad Mi. of their votes.
HILLARY IS A HYPOCRITE.

Posted by: julie | April 11, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

tejasoutlaw, I dont belive in god so I could care less what a pastor says. To make it clear I am white, I hate what white people and our country have do to black people and other minorites. I can see where this rev wright guy is coming from and what he said doesn’t bother me. I’m gonna laugh when it turn out our government did creat aids!
Just jokin about the aids thing but I did hear that theroy befor wright or obama acctualy heard it on a slayer album. Go figure.

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Obama has accepted money just about every other major oil company.

Posted by: mary | April 11, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Joe,
If you don’t care about relegion, then why so adiment about a cheating husband?
Why can’t they just have free love when they want it?
I am also not suprised by the very negative attitude regarding this country. Seems many on Obamas side have this negative attitude including his wife. Sounds like you have a perfect pesimistic candidate to match the attitude.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Mary, Were do you get your info? your right about the energy bill but wrong about this oil company stuff. Most obamas donations are $96 dosent sound like oil company money to me. She’ll lose sorry but thats is what’s happining here and to me neck and neck is a tie she’s behind and wont win.

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

I’m not a heathen I don’t think people should cheat on someone your commited to. I have parents they gave me values. I’m not negative about our country. I think if you want to move forward you have to remember where you came from.
Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it..

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Joe,
You have been mislead again.
Check out MSNBC’s report today on Obamas contributors and how they are just working around the system.
He really is taking money from special intrest, they have just worked a way around calling them special interest.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Ok guys I’ll leave you alone I got to get ready for a trip I want to ask you this though. What happens if he somehow wins penn? What then? Great debate guys!

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

If he wins PA, he has it.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Obama’s vote total is inflated by his massive Illinois count. Who knows how much fraud there was?

Posted by: geevill | April 11, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Mary that is horrible comment. So out of spite your going to vote for someone with totaly diffrent belifes than your canidate just because she might lose. You’ll vote for more war, crappy economic policy and to top it all off a republican. I couldn’t do that. It would just seem wrong to me. I feel for you though you get drawn into the whole two evils scenareo

Posted by: mary | April 11, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Were does Hillary get her money? Columbia perhaps funnled threw her husband perhaps?

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Posted by: ron | Apr 10, 2008 6:09:47 PM
Ron – how can you say you’ll vote for McCain if Obama gets the nod, but, you are a “yellow dog Dem” and we’d be “shooting ourselves in the foot by voting for McCain”.
Which way do you want it? By the way, if you are a “yellow dog Dem” then it’s pretty likely that Michelle Obama would not scare you with her looks!
Come on – think straight – not like a “dog”!

Posted by: VJmem | April 11, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

No, the pledge signed was only NOT TO CAMPAIGN IN FLORIDA, WHERE OBAMA FLOODED OUR TV SCREENS WITH ADS.
Obama does not want our votes to count because in a fair election he loses hands down.
This is not what I want in the White House . I will work very hard to see that this is never going to happen.
I am not happy with the Democratic Party itself in the handling of this whole issue. They stink to high heaven.

Posted by: John | April 11, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

I have to just say this: The TEMPERAMENT and emotional stability of a President is very important.
Surely by now everyone has to see that this woman’s emotional keel is way off.
Isn’t inappropriate laughter at odd times a sign of some sort of emotional breakdown or mental instability.
What is going on??? How many wars may we end up fighting due to a President’s untenable TEMPERAMENT!

Posted by: shelgirl | April 11, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

President Obama has won this election because he is the WINNER! Hillary’s campaign doesn’t even believe she has more than a 5-10% chance of winning. Any of you people who believe otherwise are just doing exactly what the media want you to do. This is good ratings and big money to keep covering this stuff online, in the newspapers, and on cable. But they even know that Hillary has a 5-10% chance of winning. Never in history has a presidential candidate been selected with those odds. Face the facts! She lost because, well, she lost! Even she knows that if she drops out right now, she can’t keep raising money to pay the 10 million dollars of bills she owes vendors for their services towards her campaign. She needs it to continue so she can raise funds.
On a personal note, the Clinton’s used to be my favorite. But I’ve seen the character of both candidate’s in this election. I have to say that I am more disappointed at Bill and Hillary’s character than Barack’s. If you are losing, don’t sell out who you are just to win. Be who you are at all times. Embrace it, and stick to it. A wavering character is not something I can trust.

Posted by: Davind King | April 11, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Good for you mary hopefully you get your wish. I agree with shelgirl hillary is bat sh** crazy! Also I think Hillary and Mccain are the ones flip flopping here first no tax breaks then tax breaks are good. Then no MLK day now MLK day good. First Hill dog says she accepts the DNC is rules now there no good. Then Sniper fire now no snipper fire I won’t mention the pregnat woman story or the war or NAFTA.Sound a little confused Mary.

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

This woman is emanating the vibration of a playground bully much more than the leader of the free world.
She’s like the energizer bunny of personal ambition, never mind managing her campaign, paying her bills, practicing candor, recognizing the presence of inspiration and love in this contest.
It’s like archetypal, man!!!

Posted by: Gaias Child | April 11, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

FL & MI have said that they do not/can not want to pay for another election.
Clinton was well aware of the rules; she is a lawyer and she signed off on these two states not being counted.
D-party has agreed to seat them however they left it to HRC and BHO to work out a compromise.
Now for folks that are threating to defect and will not vote for either candidate in the national election – what you are voting for is many more years of traveling down the same path in iraq and while some Americans have such blindness to think that we are a super power… as my mama use to say, “it cost to be the boss” We owe China & Japan trillions of dollars, we took the money and spent it in iraq paying both sides McCain has said that he thinks this is a good idea.
Truth is many of a certian education level or age simply do not want a black; when Rice was mentioned as possible VP first negative thing that was said is, she is black… nothing on her actions… directly to her race.
America does not want a black, hispanic or asian period.
East and West coast of America are diverse while the middle are still able to root themselves in black/white. This fact helps to have many crying about illegals. Surprise we have a large hispanic population soon to be the largest population in America and most are legal and bi-lingual.
I have know of folks in Texas that say that bi-linguals are having an advantage in the work force.
We have a huge Asian student body in our collages, because US cannot say NO to Japan or China; remember they hold the purse strings.
Not willing to change, hitching your fortunes to a 72 year old man that graduated at the bottom of his class is akin to a 3rd world nation mentality. Absolutely no other world leading nations have considered having a dinosaur holding their highest office; however, many third world nations welcomed that rear view vision.

Posted by: Daly | April 11, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

There is not a candidate that is going to make this war disapear.
We are stuck and if congress can’t find a way to stop the idiot in office now whe will be stuck there indefinatly.
He is itching to start it with Iran, so we will be stuck there.
He is not worried about people, or history. He is concerned about filling pockets with cash and they aren’t our pockets.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

NHPR’s Laura Knoy: “So, if you value the DNC calendar, why not just pull out of Michigan? Why not just say, Hey Michigan, I’m off the ballot?”
Hillary Clinton: “Well, you know, It’s clear, this election they’re having is not going to count for anything”

Posted by: Joe | April 11, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Apologies to all for my bad spelling in my earlier post.
Keep in mind that a huge reason that Bush was elected was do to smear and fear.
Let’s not repeat a failed experiment; anyone that travels internationally is well aware of how we have gone from being loved by most to be reviled by most.
Happy Friday

Posted by: Daly | April 11, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Daly,
I think Florida and Michigan should be counted no matter who signed off on it.
It obviously does not represent the best interest of the people not to count their vote. Votes should count and should not be wrapped up in a political quagmire. All votes should count and it should not be based on any particular person or group of people to take that “RIGHT” as a US Citizen away.
DNC really screwed this one up.
Get rid of Dean and fix it.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Hillary Clinton does not have to fight this hard for the nomination but she is fighting with all she’s got. She is fighting for the American people. She is fighting for me. I truly believe that she is fighting for my sake and for my childrens sake. I am one of those people that suffered with the economy and have lost a job and soon will lose my home. Obama to me is just another politician with very big ambitions. He has ran for 4 different public office positions in the past 10 years. Why so fast and so soon? He should have cleaned his closet and got rid of Ayers, Wright, Farakhan, Larry Sinclair and I would probably give him a second thought. Hillary Clinton is not perfect but she is the best candidate we have that will put my future and my childrens future in mind. BTW, has anyone seen any media reporting of the NYC protest for Clinton?

Posted by: bpatz3 | April 11, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

How Hillary can claim a win in MI when Obama wasn’t even on the ballot is beyond me. She agreed to MI and FLA not counting. I live in MI and many people, like myself, did not vote in the primary because all the candidates were not on the ballot. She did not win here! Either there is a revote or the delegates are split evenly between the two. The former ‘ain’t happening, so I guess the latter is the best way. Why don’t people call her on this? She such a scumbag.

Posted by: April Campbell | April 11, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Bob from DC,
We all will join Republican Party, then Bob you better to be more polite toward Hillary. All of you Obama’s supporters clearly cutting the branch that we are sitting on. Good luck.

Posted by: Janna | April 11, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Wow, the profanity of the Obama supporters is so low class. It hurts them on how Obama’s records are known.

Posted by: Keasha | April 11, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Amazing how she agreed to exclude Fl and Mi when she was expecting a coronation. Now she’s behind and suddenly she can’t imagine abiding by her previous agreement. She needs Dr. Phil.

Posted by: don | April 11, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

tejasoutlaw I never said that FL & MI should not be counted. I am simply saying that due to the catastrophe that was signed off by all Democratic candidates; the Dems need to figure out a compromise.
I suggest that the delegates in FL & MI be split 50/50 with HRC and BHO getting 25/25 going into convention.
The remaining 50% of the FL/MI delegates can then vote for whomever. Not a great solution but should be considered because; As has been said many times, Fact is a delegate can vote for whoever they want once they get to the convention.
Alternatively, we can spend the Dem’s small war chest; waste more time and energy to have delegates STILL go their own way at the convention.

Posted by: Daly | April 11, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

She’ll do anything to win, including but not limited to the destruction of the Democratic Party. Fortunately, her antics won’t be enough.

Posted by: don | April 11, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

She is dogging her own party. Well go run with McCain Hillary, since you think he is the better candidate anyway.
Geesh.

Posted by: Dancing Angel | April 11, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

You know, the Constitution doesn’t mention primaries, or even parties for that matter, Emily. And the primaries only commit the delegates for the first polling at the convention. Delegates for MI and FL should be seated, whether or not they vote in the first polling. If there’s no winner at the first ballot, things should be very interesting!

Posted by: JB | April 11, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Hillary has no credibility to her point of the disenfranchisement of voters. If she was really concerned, she would have been fighting for this before it may or may not help her win the nomination. The biggest reason she has no credibility on this subject is: you can not cry foul of the disenfranchisement of voters in two states while at the same time lobbying hard and stating publically your desire to overturn the “pledged delegates” who attend the convention based on the will of the people who have voted and cacused. The “I’ll have my cake and eat it too” is wearing thin….

Posted by: Paige | April 11, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

So she wants every vote to count… unless the popular vote goes to Obama. Then it should be left to the judgement of the delegates.
It’s really astonishing that so many people in this country cannot see how completely full-of-it the clintons are. It’s just astonishing!

Posted by: squeenter squillo | April 11, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Hillary does not hate the military. Her Dad was a veteran from War World II & proud.

Posted by: Keasha | April 11, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

At different time and different situation, we should have different answer and solution in order to make things better. To keep the same words all the time no matter what, that is radical. The key issue is right now, the presidencial race is virtually tigh. To make more difference, count the FL and MI votes became critical. If Obama is little bit behind, I am sure he will make the same proposal as Hillary did. They violated the party rule, it is wrong, punish people the right to vote also wrong. To be fair for all – candidates and voters, count them all.

Posted by: Li | April 11, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

In Case You Missed It, Obama has lost the 10-point lead nationally over McCain he had a month ago, while Hillary leads McCain 48% to 45% in the same poll. Way to go Hillary! We wont let the media influence the voters minds in who we need to vote for.
Go Hillary!
Three In 36 Hours: Hillary received the support of three new automatic delegates over the past 36 hours…the campaign also announced that Hillary has now received the endorsement of over 270 elected officials in Pennsylvania.

Posted by: Keasha | April 11, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Okay, enough of the racist and sexist comments. The Democratic Party has stood for equality for all people. In 2000, as Democrats, we screamed bloody murder over the disenfranchisement of Florida voters. In 2008, the DNC and Senator Obama want to disenfranchise Florida and Michigan? It doesn’t fly. It’s not about Clinton or Obama, it’s about the voters and their rights being stripped. Rights most of our forefathers and foremothers fought hard for. Two hundred years ago, you had to be white, male, and wealthy in order to vote. On August 26, 1920, after two-thirds of the states had ratified the 19th Amendment to the Constitution, women won the right to vote. By the letter of the law, blacks had been allowed to vote since the passage of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution in 1868. Google the names, Bob Moses, Alice Paul, and Thomas Dorr. Find out how hard our ancestors fought for the right to vote. And now, 2.3 million voters are being told they have no rights. In the year 2008. Yes indeed, shame on the Democratic Party.

Posted by: SandyS | April 11, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

For the sake of all women in this country and all over the world, I hope Hillary surmounts the tidal wave of sexism coming from the media, pundits, bloggers, prevails in this election and gets a chance to show all those men, women and children out there who doubt the abillity of a woman to lead that not only can a woman lead, she can do it without confrontation, insults, and ego trips that usually accompany the experience of men in power.

Posted by: Anne-Marie | April 11, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

I AM A PROFESSIONAL WHITE WOMAN AND AM HILARY FAN. IN ALL FAIRNESS, I MUST ADMIT THAT OBAMA HAS BEEN THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO HAS HAD THE COURAGE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF RACE ELOQUENTLY (BEFORE OR AFTER THE WRIGHT ISSUE, THAT’S BESIDE THE POINT) AND HAS TRIED TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE RACE ISSUES FACING AMERICA. I CONSIDER MYSELF PRAGMATIC AND THEREFORE TRY TO AVOID THOSE WHO WANT TO MAKE THE WHOLE CAMPAIGN INTO A GENDER ISSUE.I WOULD DEFINITELY PREFER AND VOTE OBAMA OVER MCCAIN. WE HAVE HAD 8 YEARS OF REPUBLICANS’ DISASTROUS GOVERNANCE. IT HAS BEEN A DARK PERIOD FOR AMERICA.

Posted by: American woman | April 11, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Obama has no integrity and will say and do anything to get elected. The only thing he would agree to was a caucus where his team could intimidate and coerce voters. Those who chose not to vote in the MI and FL primaries did so of their own free will and bad judgment. They don’t deserve a second chance. But those who voted earned a right to be heard. This problem was created by the shortsightedness of Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean when they agreed in October that the delegates would be seated by the nominee. They need to fix it – fairly. It may not be possible to count the votes in MI but FL is an easy fix. Count the votes! This is nonsense.

Posted by: Joan | April 11, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

illary Rodham Clinton wants voters to decide the nomination based on who can coolly and competently run the country. She had better hope they don’t study her recent campaign too closely for the answer. Clinton has overseen two major staff shake-ups in two months. She has left a trail of unpaid bills and unhappy vendors and had to loan her own campaign $5 million to keep it afloat in January. Her campaign badly underestimated her main adversary, Barack Obama, miscalculated the importance of organizing caucus states and was caught flat-footed after failing to lock up the nomination on Super Tuesday. The Clinton [...] campaign has been marked by strategic missteps, financial uncertainty and personnel drama. Its strengths — a supremely disciplined candidate and remarkable fundraising — have been undermined by other aspects of the enterprise, such as a headstrong, factionalized staff and a spendthrift approach. The conventional wisdom once held that it was Bill Clinton who was chronically improvisational and unable to run a tight ship. That flaw, it seems, runs in the family.It would be easy to dismiss all of this as fairly conventional political stumbling — if she hadn’t made her supreme readiness and managerial competence the central issue of her presidential campaign. .. “Any time you are involved in a long campaign, there are going to be major substantive and procedural gaffes,” says former Democratic Rep. David Bonior, an uncommitted superdelegate who served as the campaign manager to John Edwards. “The question is how a campaign handles those gaffes and how a candidate handles them. And I think it’s fair to say that Sen. Obama has handled [his] problems better than Sen. Clinton.” Clinton’s defenders argue that the relatively smooth-running Obama operation obscures the reality that the first-term Illinois senator is an untested, naive politician who showed little spine or genius during his unremarkable four years in the U.S. Senate. Clinton loyalists think the Obama story has a predictable conclusion: He gets torn apart by a ruthless GOP and crushed in the general election. But, it is also true that a fair measurement of the candidates’ leadership skills is their management of their campaign. Easily the largest enterprise they have run in their lives — in February alone, Obama had 1,280 paid employees, at a cost of $2.61 million; Clinton had 935 employees and a monthly payroll of $1.63 million — the campaign reveals flaws and strengths that will only be magnified in the Oval Office.

Posted by: unbiased | April 11, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Clinton will get my vote if she happens to win the nomination..im sorry, its not a racial issue, but i will never vote obama..in my opinion another republican will be much much better than obama..Hillary for president, if not her, Mccain!!

Posted by: ryan | April 11, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

What about the democrats in Florida and Michigan who did not vote because they did not have the benefit of a campaign and had been told that their votes would not count?
I could understand the “disenfranchised voter” discussion if the people did not know in advance that the delegates would not be seated. They voted even though they KNEW IN ADVANCE the delegates would not be seated by the DNC. Now it’s an issue?
How to truly disenfranchise voters.
If you:
1. Did not get the benefit of having the candidates campaign so that you could have an idea of whom you were voting for. (Clinton had a direct advantage with this. She was the only candidate who had national name recognition, thanks to her husbands terms as president. ALL of the other candidates had to campaign state by state at that time. We did not know much about ANY other candidate, not just Obama.)
2. Chose not to vote because you were told it wouldn’t count for anything or voted in the republican primary so that your vote would count for something.
3. Found out AFTER THE FACT that votes would count when you chose an option based on the fact that you HAD BEEN TOLD THEY WOULDN’T!
Now THAT would guarantee genuinely disenfranchised voters.

Posted by: Hanna | April 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Enough of this please, I live in FL. I did not vote in the primary because my vote would not count due the fact that they broke the rules of the DNC and were told before hand this would happen. All candidates agreed. (Even those that were NOT up 20pts in the polls) The only fair and practical way to do it is to seat delegates and split them evenly between the candidates left standing. What about the 2 million people disenfranchised that did not vote because they were told it would not count?

Posted by: WhiteGuy2 | April 11, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Anne-Marie , just cause she is a woman, it does not mean she can lie, and lie a lot, it’s not like one or maybe two lies, it’s a mile long list of lies and now it’s to the point where nobody cares that she lies, you hear what you want to hear, but when she snaps her finger and you wake up, it’s too late…

Posted by: Hal | April 11, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Obama says he is for CHANGE? If he is elected, the only thing left in our pockets will be CHANGE.

Posted by: Independent | April 11, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Warweary, I can even begin to understand what you have been trough, but my opinion is that if these countries want us there, then they need to pay America for the service, we are building their infrastructure and the folks here in the U.S. have bigger problems of our own….

Posted by: Hal | April 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Clinton continues to prove over and over again that she is not what this country needs. There is tape and print of her saying clearly these contests won’t count but now that she needs votes, no one will let her have them even if they don’t count.
She is trying to do anything to win and she thinks the Republicans have it right, I say let her go over to them. The Democrats are growing very weary of her and her husbands tactics to try and do anything to win. This is way past a contest. It’s one that everyone knows she can’t win. If she really does want what is best for the party, she will step aside on June 3.

Posted by: Renee | April 11, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

bpatz3 Sorry, I did not intentionally leave Bill Ayers out, I am unaware of him and find it best not to speak on things that I do not know.
cheers

Posted by: Daly | April 11, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

warweary, if you didnt want to go to war, you should have not signed up for the military..quite your crying, and be a man..i feel no sorrow for you..yeah, its sad the military people are dying, they signed up for it, they knew might happen..like i said before, if obama wins the nomination, i will vote mccain

Posted by: ryan | April 11, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Whiteguy2,
So you don’t want the voice of the people heard, you just want the delegates to be counted.
What since does that make?
The will of the people should be heard.
Splitting the delegates evenly is not the will of the people.
Man,
Howard Dean and company really skrewed things up.
The way the have done this is going to leave half of the party upset either way. How he could ever try to take away someones vote in the first place is beyond me.
I am from Texas, so I really wasn’t in tune with what the boneheads where doing.
Who cares when they vote.
Let them vote,
Let them vote,
Let them vote,
Yes we can,
Yes we can,
We are the richist country in the world. We can afford new elections.
If all them DEMS backed new elections it would happen.
The travisty is that one candidates followers don’t want it because they are afraid of the outcome.
They just want their candidate to win, not have the voice of all the people heard.

Posted by: tejasoutlaw | April 11, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

whatever, i only have one word for you..whatever…i only say the truth…i do appreciate what they are doing over there…but, i didnt sign up for the military because i dont want to go over there..when attacked by someone, that did sign up for it..that asked to go to war basically, i will respond…again i say, i will never vote obama, mccain will get my vote over obama..i hope HIllary gets it.. i feel she is the best suited

Posted by: ryan | April 11, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Yes warweary Thank you!
Ryan did not sign up yet he feels free to insure that many more Americans needless die with his ignorant views.

Posted by: Daly | April 11, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

awww Daly, did i just ruin the comment you obviously worked on for a while? sorry, we live in America where i am allowed to have my views and my thoughts on things..if you dont like it, you dont have to read it, but please, before you try to belittle me or make me feel like im wrong, why dont you do some background checking, ask me a question or something rather than making yourself look foolish…and again, i say, i wont be going to war because i didnt and wont sign up for the military..i wont get drafted due to past sports injuries.

Posted by: ryan | April 11, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Hal, please read my comment again. I never say anything about lying. Perhaps you are so brainwashed by Obama’s campaign that you only see what you want to see. Even when it’s not there. I said she will provide leadership without confrontation, insults, and ego trips. Calling someone a liar is a confrontational insult. You must be a guy.
How ironic that you accuse me of only hearing what I want to hear.
You know what? If you are still holding on to some naive belief that there is a politician out there who does not lie, you truly are drinking kool aid. Yes folks, politicians lie. Even your precious Obama. He said dismissively in a national debate that he did a few hours of work for his Chicago slum lord friend Rezko, and that he only got $100K of campaign contributions from him which he returned, when in fact, he received over 200K in campaign contributions from him, and only bothered to acknowledge that a few weeks ago. Oh, and Rezko also helped him buy a $1.5 million dollar mansion.
Freaking wake up. Obama is a lying politician, inexperienced, and will be a puppet just like George W. Bush was–a puppet for the left-wing coalition of the Democratic Party.
Hillary is a moderate, centrist Democrat who if she wins despite Big Media bias against her, and despite Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi and Donna Brazile being against her she will truly be a President who has been chosen by the people, and not by the power brokers of Washington.

Posted by: Anne-Marie | April 11, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

bpatz3
I will check out the link and other research on the issue you present. Thanks for sharing. It is good to have a respectfully debate.

Posted by: Daly | April 11, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Ryan,
gotta run but did not want you to think I am ignoring you.
As you have reasons that prevent you from being drafted, consider your lover and other loved ones could be thanking you for your vote. They may be drafted!
Happy Friday

Posted by: Daly | April 11, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Daly, i do not think we are anywhere near a draft here in America..take it easy…hope i didnt offend, but i dont like being attacked and told im wrong..plus, there is much much more to this election than just the war..to me..gay rights and gay marriage are as big an issue as the war..call me selfish, but they are as important to me…Mccain is for sure not for the gay rights, Obama isnt so much either..he takes a back seat..that is why im for Hillary

Posted by: ryan | April 11, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

LA in Indiana
The agreement not to campaign in Florida also included a ban on electronic campaigning (TV and radio). Do your homework.

Posted by: Ron, MA | April 11, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

She can’t understand the Democratic Party?
Hmmmmm……

Posted by: Thinking | April 11, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Her answer to columbia free trade is absolutely a sign of ignorance and stupidity. Is that a type of a person to be our president. NO WAY.

Posted by: petro moralis | April 11, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Who care how many angels dance on the head of a pin? Answer the conflict of interest question, and try to stop annoying people. Try.

Posted by: CC | April 11, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Petro, Hillary is exactly who I want for president. YES WAY! And what exactly do you mean, “a type of person?” What type are you referring to? Female? Experienced? Super educated and intelligent? Compassionate? Hard Worker? Public Servant? Why do people insist on demonizing this woman who has done more to help other people in her life time then most of us ever will or even care to? Your comment was actually shallow and pointless. Just more venomous, meaningless blather. What exactly do you think qualifies someone to be president, that Obama has and she doesn’t? A Y chromosome?
Let’s face it. Everyone makes up their mind based on mostly biased reasons that have nothing to do with who would make the best president.
This campaign and an outcome will not reflect who makes the best president, but who this country and its civilization at this point in time is willing to accept as its leader.
Who can more voters stomach in the end? An elderly white guy, a white older woman or a younger black or biracial guy?
Time will tell.

Posted by: Anne-Marie | April 11, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Some people have suggested Hillary was for seating the Fl and Mi delegations from the start. Well her campaign chief, Hariold Ickes was on the rules panel, and supported the rules panels decision that they shouldn’t count.
In Michigan, every other candidate took there name off the ballot, Hillary did not. In Florida they did not have time too, but I am convinced that if they had the opportunity, all the other candidates would have removed there names from the ballot.
In both states, those voting knew their votes were not electing delegates. I think actually its the height of fairness for the DNC and others to TRY find some resolution that leaves those states with seats at the convention. Its fine to suggest voters have been disenfranchised, but that happened before the elections took place. Clinton is being very disengenuos in my view to suggest that the results of flawed elections should be taken into account.

Posted by: markymark | April 11, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Some people have suggested Hillary was for seating the Fl and Mi delegations from the start. Well her campaign chief, Hariold Ickes was on the rules panel, and supported the rules panels decision that they shouldn’t count.
In Michigan, every other candidate took there name off the ballot, Hillary did not. In Florida they did not have time too, but I am convinced that if they had the opportunity, all the other candidates would have removed there names from the ballot.
In both states, those voting knew their votes were not electing delegates. I think actually its the height of fairness for the DNC and others to TRY find some resolution that leaves those states with seats at the convention. Its fine to suggest voters have been disenfranchised, but that happened before the elections took place. Clinton is being very disengenuos in my view to suggest that the results of flawed elections should be taken into account.

Posted by: markymark | April 11, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Joe – thanks for the highly intellectual posting. Really appreciate that.

Posted by: bpatz3 | April 11, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

What’s really frustrating about this election is, in a nutshell, the Obama voters. When will you wake up?? When will you get your heads out of the clouds and face the reality of what is going on to this country in this world?? Stop wishing on a change tomorrow and start facing the reality of today?? We have a WAR–and a battle (we can’t forget Afghanastan), housing foreclosures, healthcare, a recession happening today. We are a country in crisis, that’s all coming to a head (dare I say, as planned) as Bush is on his way out. Do you really want or trust your immediate future in the hands of a novice, with a promising future instead of someone who has “lived” and EXPERIENCED a little more of life’s traumas? Do you really believe that in November, when the Republicans come knocking, that there will be enough people who will have your same amount of confidence in a rookie during these critical times? Absolutely NOT! In November, if it is Obama against McCain, we will lose. Obama does not give that vote of confidence for being able to rectify this country’s problems. We’ve got too much going on. Yes, Obama would be great if everything was not so topsy-turvy, like the pre-Bush era, but right now, Obama cannot handle being that multi-tasked. This is a chance for us to have a two for one, which is what we need. To hurry and get us back on track. Obama represents wishful thinking, that we can indulge in one day, but not today. Hillary is the reality of today. She is THE ONLY choice for this country. In the end, it is familiarity and experience that counts.

Posted by: Annette | April 11, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

gpatz3: haha…anytime.

Posted by: joe | April 11, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Annette – very well said. As I have been posting over and over again. I am living those issues right now. I have lost a job and my house is about to be foreclosed on. I have to consider my future and my childrens future in this election. Hillary Clinton might not be as eloquent as Obama…she might not be as pretty for the sight as Obama…but she knows what is at stake for this country right now. She might not be perfect but she is the best candidate we have.

Posted by: bpatz3 | April 11, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

The truth hasn’t come out about the Michigan ballot. Hillary didn’t win there because she was the only one on the ballot. And the candidates weren’t told to remove their names. The agreement the candidates made were not to campaign in our state of Michigan (they were threatened by the New Hampsire and Iowa representatives). Barack chose to remove his own name from the ballot in Michigan (though it’s very interesting he didn’t remove his name from Florida). The Michigan voters held legally sanctioned Democratic and Republican primary elections and those who wanted Hillary voted for her. Everyone else either voted “uncommitted” or crossed over and voted Republican. This has been misreported by mainstream media and misunderstood by the public. We Michigan voters are outraged that our votes are not being counted as they were cast and many of us will react in kind in November by voting for John McCain. And I for one(lifelong Democrat) personally will turn my back on the Democratic Party forever if Hillary isn’t awarded the votes she rightly earned in our Primary election. As far as I’m concerned the Democratic Party has been hijacked by the far left (with radical, black power and domestic terrorist ties) who wants to turn our country into a socialist society with an emphasis on wealth redistribution.

Posted by: Maggie | April 11, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Joe, first of all, you just called Hillary a loser, so I highly doubt you are still capable of having an open minded discussion about this, but I’ll play. First of all, in order to figure out who the best person for the job is, you have to have a system of judging them. And I think each person has different criteria for what a President of the U.S. should embody. So, name me your top 3 qualities that you think every President should have and we’ll go from there and compare the B and H.
(For example, I think a President needs to have experience in the field, have a record of working hard on behalf of people, and should be very diplomatic.)

Posted by: AM | April 11, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

If Obama had been the only candidate to leave his name on the MI ballot his supporters would be swooning about what a great campaign strategist he is. Support Hillary for an independent run! Do not let Obama get the presidency! The Democratic party is done!

Posted by: Tom in MA | April 11, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

OBAMA: You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Who does he think he is looking down on those people from small towns? Too arrogant.

Posted by: bpatz3 | April 11, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

They both agreed the votes in Fla and Mi would not count. Now that she is at the end of the bridge and will not win she claims foul. Just like she is doing about Bosnia. She has no morals and needs to go away. America has serious problems and she is not the answer. Washington is controlled by business and she is not going to change that.

Posted by: rebelva | April 11, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Of course she is screaming.
But why did she keep the man on who helped create this problem. She should have Fired or at the very least bent Harold Ickes ear and had him vote no to punishing those states.
For the life of me i cannot figure out why she didnt?? According to her she cares for all the voters..her words my words are she cares to get the votes.
hummmm maybe abc or the huffingtonpost or nytimes will find out why???

Posted by: Lauren | April 11, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

That’s it, Mrs. Clinton! Go run as an independent. You’ll show ‘em!

Posted by: w_roos | April 11, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Since when does observing that someone is bitter, perhaps even that they have a right to be bitter, been looking down on someone? If those people have gone 25 years without being able to find viable work, at least partially if not totally because of American foreign economic policy, they have plenty of reason for bitterness. I would be bitter in that case. The fact that I would be bitter would not make me less of a person but instead would simply make me human. The fact that anyone jumps on that observation as saying that they are less than is such a political ploy that it is indefensible. If someone loses a relative and another person observes that they seem depressed, does that mean that they are saying that person is a bad person? If someone is angry because they lost their job without just cause and it is observed does that mean that they are a bad person? The fact that some people are bitter, that they feel resentful or pain at their loss, is not a negative observation by Obama but simply a truthful one.

Posted by: Saywhat? | April 11, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

The Clinton conference call featured Pennsylvania State Democratic Chairman T.J. Rooney accusing Obama of failing to tell voters about the contributions from oil company employees. Rooney omitted to say that Clinton has taken $309,363 from oil company employees, nearly $100,000 more than Obama, according to the website

Posted by: Lauren | April 11, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

My democratic party had no plan for the mess were in MI and FL. So here is the a solution to allow the popular votes to stand since they have been certified by each Secy. of STate of MI and FL. Florida divide up the delagates according to have they would have been won and then penalize them by halving them. Michigan is different count the popular vote, sorry obama but you should have left your name on the ballot you should not get any delegates where your name isnt on the ballot american politics has been know for cheating and problems but how can you say give me half of the delegates when you told your backers to vote uncommitted, that might be what cause obama to lose in Nov, folks say Hillary has no complaint she agree only not to campaign in these states what idiot would give up two wins, obama followers i love them to death but as a TN blue dog democrat i believe a repeat of 2004 could happen where the elite and media control us voters going with the more liberal nominee and the GOP has learned a vaulable lesson after an unpopular conservative presdient a move more to the right of center or left of center would be a better change before going with liberal the exact reverse of bush. thats why hillary would have a better, not to say he couldnt win but it would be close, chance because she can easily pile up votes from the middle, the people left of me will be Democrats in the fall and GOP conservatives arent goin anywhere but to the right. we can have us folks in the middle torn because yall are giving the media something to do when this media that didnt catch GW in his lies and exposed him.
Clinton/Obama 08
Obama/Clinton 08
Ill take one of these choices or I’ll vote Independent for me
QT ’08

Posted by: Quintell | April 12, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

Lauren: Hillary Clinton did not put out an advertisement saying she didn’t take money from the oil companies. Obama did. Now this is what I call a LIE. Where are all of you Bosnian lie dectors now? It almost seems as though he didn’t think people would know about his public campaign records. Or more like he didn’t think people would pay attention. Maybe he’s right.

Posted by: Geneva | April 12, 2008, 3:41 am 3:41 am

You know what people will do by what they have done in the past.
The Obamas gave 10% of their income.
Talk is cheap.
You do the math.

Posted by: Sam | April 12, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

For those of you talking about the rules do your research. The candidates only specified that they would not campaign in those states. The DNC decided to nullify FL & MI votes AFTER that pact was signed. Why is it a ploy that Hillary wants votes to count. Why are you not asking Obama WHY he would accept a nomination based on 48 states? If Hillary dropped out you bet he would hop on the vote count band wagon as long as he has nothing to lose. Oh but wait, he would be disqualified anyway for those delegates as Obama broke party rules by talking to the press in FL and again in MI by running ads telling Michiganders to vote UNCOMMITTED in their primary. Those are specifically against DNC Rules.

Posted by: NV Dem | April 12, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

We have to count the votes of Michigan & Florida and leave it up to the delegates of those States to support the candidate they chose. We can’t disenfranchise voters. I know I would not like it if someone told me my vote did not matter. If there is no re-vote in those States, count the votes. The candidates will just have to live with the results. Peace.

Posted by: frank | April 12, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

It’s fun reading what everyone has to say for his/her candidate of choice. Not that it is influencing one or the other. You can sugarcoat what his name or roll Hillary in mud, I would still vote for Hillary. But I will swallow another four years of McCain if she is not on the ballot this Novemeber.

Posted by: HillaryForPresident | April 12, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I can’t believe anyone who is gullible enough to believe the polls – leading the ignorant and the sheep into mass destruction.
MSNBC and CNN are very biased! I can’t believe anyone would be blind or stupid enough not to see this.
MSNBC POLLS = LIES/MANIPULATIONS/BIAS FOR OBAMA
These are the people who are voting for Obama – individuals who cannot research and reason on their own. MSNBC said go jump over a cliff because it is the right thing to do – you would do it.
Also, this ridiculous hatred of the Clintons is the most stupid thing – does anyone remember the wonderful years during Bill Clinton’s administration? We need some serious help right now – we are in trouble.
May God help us!!!!
HILLARY 08 or I will do a write in candidate

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | April 12, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Charles: Let me go on record to state that Obama doesn’t want a re-vote because or the delegates to be seated because if DNC seats Fl and MI Hillary would catch up or be ahead of Obama and Howard Dean endorsed Obama that’s why Howard Dean penalized those states but he didn’t penalize New Hampshire when they changed their primary because he thought Obama was going to win. Didn’t he get fooled.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 12, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

for Hillary: Maybe you can’t stand yourself. Obama is not going to win the nomination so brace yourself for that. I don’t like Obama, and any American that does are in the same category as he is. He is anti-american, a liar, fake, copycat and I just read that Obama got a book of RFK’s speeches so he could study them. Isn’t he smart for going to college? Give me a break!!

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 12, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Bob: I got news for you, Obama is going to be the loser and all the Obama voters are going to cry in their beer. And that’s the best thing that can happen so American can get back to where it was if Hillary or McCain are elected. Obama doesn’t have the brains to sit on or the window to throw them out of. Get a grip and wake up.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 12, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Bob: I got news for you, Obama is going to be the loser and all the Obama voters are going to cry in their beer. And that’s the best thing that can happen so American can get back to where it was if Hillary or McCain are elected. Obama doesn’t have the brains to sit on or the window to throw them out of. Get a grip and wake up.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 12, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Frank: Neither candidate will have the required total delegates and that’s what the superdelegates are for. They have a right to vote like everyone else. And DNC didn’t penalize New Hampshire when they changed their primary date. Howard Dean thought that Obama was going to win. Now that he knows Hillary would get the MI delegates and part of FL he doesn’t want them seated because Hillary would catch up to Obama or surpass him. Dean endorsed Obama and should not endorse any candidate.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 12, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Hillary Clinton changes her stance with the direction of the wind. She is like whichever one favors her, she is all for it notwithstanding what she previously said. This is why she could say that Michigan and Florida votes would count for nothing, and when the tides changed against her she came out in full support of Michigan and Florida. It is a SHAME. My guess is: Hillary Clinton does not believe in anything AND DOES NOT CARE ABOUT HOW SHE IS SEEN BY OTHERS AS LONG AS SHE WINS.
During the Ohio-Texas primary, she ranted the notorious “shame on you, Obama” on NAFTA; the next day news had it that it was her own campaign that actually approached Canada and she denied it. The press passed on that and she won both primaries although Sen. Obama got more delegates in Texas – thank God for that.
I know that some people who vote for Hillary do that no matter what they found out about her including her lies about Bosnia sniper fire, $800,000.00 PAID TO Bill Clinton or $300,000.00 paid to Mark Penn, her campaign strategist – I am not one of those thank God, and I used to support her. I am a woman and a free and godly one who do not think that lies and politics go hand in hand. I am sorry for those who think that politics and lies are synonymous. I am happy I saw the light.
She claims to oppose NAFTA and Colombia free trade while her campaign chief strategist, Mark Penn was paid $300,000.00 by Colombia government. As that was not insult enough on us voters we learned that Bill Clinton, her husband had been paid $800,000.00 by same Colombian government for the same purpose for which Mark Penn was paid – to lobby for them. That she can look supporters in the eyes and tell them she does not support Colombia free trade or NAFTA is the same way she looked them straight in the eyes and told them the fabricated Bosnia sniper fire fiction as reality.
You know, anything I remember that she voted in support of the bill that made it impossible for poor people (who she claims to fight) to file for bankruptcy I have cold shivers. How can she say she is fighting for poor people and yet would support this bill that has made life more unbearable?
Does anyone wonder why she is so insistent on winning the nomination? Answer: $800,000.00.
HILLARY CLINTON IS A BOLD FACE LIAR. I am sorry I sound like this.

Posted by: Kizeem | April 13, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

Hillary doesn’t care about the voters here in Michigan, Florida or the rest of the country!! She only cares about POWER and getting it by any means necessary!!
If she wasn’t losing to Obama, she wouldn’t care about MI and FL. She’s a LIAR and a CHEAT! Her name WASN’T supposed to be on the MI ballot, by having her name on the MI ballot when all the other candidates names WERE NOT, SHE’S the one that disenfranchised the voters here in Michigan! She didn’t WIN our Primary, she SCAMMED it! Hillary thought this whole thing would be over by February 5th (Super Tuesday and she was recorded saying so) and she wouldn’t need MI and FL but to show how diabolical the woman is, she disenfranchised us anyway…just in case!
If the Democratic Party had any sense, they’d end this foolishness before Hillary drags the whole country down with her!

Posted by: Michigan Voter | April 13, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Hillary, I hope you get the nomination but if the Democrats are stupid enough to put up Obama as their nominee, you owe them nothing to unite the party or to stand behind Obama.
If they put up Obama, then the Democrats deserve to lose the White House and dont you even tell us, the 28%, to unite behind Obama. Because we never will, Hillary, because we know better. Country first, Hillary;
Then party.
We will not vote Obama, not even if you bought us breakfast, lunch and dinner.
And not even if you called us personally to make the request.
Country before party …
Hillary, then MCCAIN.
But keep running, Hillary … Maybe, the Democrats will wise up before it is too late for the party !!!

Posted by: CountryFirst | April 13, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Hillary should run as an independent!

Posted by: Alex | May 5, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

I remember Hillary’s speeches back when she was winning saying “MI and FL didn’t mean anything because they had been stripped of the delegate count.” She didnt care about these people then. How like her now to say that Obama blocked a revote when he actually said “he supported a revote in FL and MI as long as it was fair”.

Posted by: kat | May 14, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.