Apr 5, 2008 4:49pm

Clinton’s New Popular Vote Argument

ABC News’ Eloise Harper reports: For a while now, Sen. Hillary Clinton has been saying that the winner of the popular vote should matter.

But if Michigan and Florida don’t count in the Democratic nominating process, it might be difficult for Clinton to catch up to Sen. Barack Obama in the popular vote. So during a campaign stop in Hillsboro, Ore., today she offered some new language outlining how she feels like those two states should be added to the official tally.

"The popular vote in Florida and Michigan has already been counted. It was determined by election results. It was certified by election officials in each state. It’s been officially tallied by the secretary of state in each state," she said. "And the question is whether those 2.3 million Democrats will be honored and the delegates seated by the Democratic Party."

She said that she will fight for these votes to count.

"I will also be fighting to make sure that the votes of the people in Florida and Michigan are counted," she said. "2.3 million voters turned out — the highest turnout in a primary in either state. Now some say their votes should be ignored and the popular vote in Michigan and Florida should just be discounted. Well, I have a different view."

In front of a crowd of about 2,000 people, she placed an emphasis on speaking about the environment and "green-collar" jobs. Clinton also took a subtle jab at her opponent.

"I am a fighter," she said. :I believe this country is worth fighting for. And I also believe that you don’t make difficult consequential change in America merely by wishing for it or hoping for it."

Clinton also told the crowd, how close she thinks this race is and that she is not going anywhere.

"We have 10 contests still to go and those that wanted to end this election which is so close it’s historic, closer than we have seen in decades and decades, it is neck and neck," she said. "It would be like saying we have two minutes to go on the clock and let’s quit. Well, one thing I hope you know about me is I don’t quit."

User Comments

Clinton lost ALL credibility regarding “let all the votes count” when she started her ploy and statements that pledged delegates are not really pledged and basically should vote for her. Delegates are sent to the convention representing the WILL of the votes via the primaries and caucuses in their states. To have them “change” as she has requested gives any argument she puts forth on the subject of voter fairness pointless.

Posted by: sc | April 5, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

‘Pledged delegates are not pledged’, as per Senator Hilary Untrustworthy. lol
So Hilary’s pledge delegates ARE FREE to desert her campaign for Obama’s.
And let’s hope that her pledge delegates desert Hilary soon, so that the Dem’s national campaign can begin in earnest.

Posted by: New Yorker | April 5, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

It’s amazing how many voters — not to mention most of the MSM — have bought into this “popular vote” bs. Don’t you all see it is more Clinton alchemy? First it was about delegates. Oops! Your opponent has more than you and you can’t catch up. OK, well then, they’re not really PLEDGED, you know — there’s no such thing. Besides, it’s about the states I’ve won with the most electoral votes. Oops! History shows there’s no correlation between winning states’ primaries and winning them in the g.e. Oh, well in that case, it’s the popular vote. Oops! Your opponent is ahead by 700,000. Well, yeah, but that’s without counting the two states that I agreed in writing wouldn’t count. But you can’t DISENFRANCHISE those poor voters!! What do you mean I didn’t care until I fell behind? Details, details!!

Posted by: jac13 | April 5, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

WestCoastMessanger, it is good to live with hope, that is what Obama is asking us to do. Hill, the Bosnian Commander in Chief, will not win popular vote or number of pledged or superdelegates. The writing is on the wall, you do not want to see it. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | April 5, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Count all the votes. If you don’t then Obama is stealing the nomination. WRIGHT! He will do anything to win, even pissing off 2.3million people, he is retarded.

Posted by: D | April 5, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

I’m EMBARRASSED for her now. This election was over after Texas/Ohio, and I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt that she was fighting the good fight, but this is pathetic.
Seriously, any day now she’s gonna call for the votes on Pluto to count.

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Didn’t work for Gore in 2000, and won’t work for her now. Of course, she’d have a much, much, more credible argument if she actually LED in the popular vote, OR electoral college. Keep dreamin’ Hilliary. You can steal what ISN’T yours!!!

Posted by: hey | April 5, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Any worthwhile leader HAS TO HAVE INTEGRITY!
In a large nation of 300 million citizens, no national leader can interact directly with every citizen.
Therefore THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE WORDS OF THE LEADER is vital for meaningful and effective communication about national matters!
(Remember the words about WMD and al kaida being in Iraq, which is costing Americans in lives, limbs, mental health and huge budget deficit?)
Which American would trust the words of ANY Clinton in leadership position?
Hilary Clinton changes her words and position as frequently as she changes her napkins.
No principle!
No integrity!
Untrustworthiness is horrible in a female, especially an older female!
Bad example for the young women of America is Hilary Clinton. For shame!

Posted by: New Yorker | April 5, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Obama is stealing this nomination like Bush did Gore and we democrats are letting it happen. This isn’t democracy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: bob | April 5, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Obama can never be trusted with in our white house ,because of his background,i think that ill. should be sued for even electing him as a sentor with his back ground, he should be in prison, not in the white house making all of the decisions concerning our country, another man mebe but not obama

Posted by: bob | April 5, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

WCM>>>>>> hilly stands up herself and her self only….If you think this woman and I use the word carefully is for you , you are mistaken.She only wants POWER and will do ANYTHING to get it.Got all the money she needs now and more to come after the 2007 taxes about 41 mil…..She won’t show these yet for the money came for big companies that paid her to shut up about her BIG medical plan.One insurance co. alone gave her over 800.000 ,,,,,,,,,,

Posted by: h | April 5, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

The popular vote in Florida and Michigan has already been counted. It was determined by election results. It was certified by election officials in each state. It’s been officially tallied by the secretary of state in each state,” she said. “And the question is whether those 2.3 million Democrats will be honored and the delegates seated by the Democratic Party.”
he needs them so therefore she will fight for them or better yet there numbers

Posted by: lauren | April 5, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Thinking: So what!
The bigger issue is that Obama has to outspend her in Pennsylvania as he did in Texas and Ohio – and he still can’t win.

Posted by: morningside | April 5, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Jay,
I disagree with your assessment. Even if by some DNC Magic those totals were to be included (including MI, where only Clinton’s name was on the ballot), the question is moot anyway.
Delegates is how the nominees are chosen, and even Clinton surrogates concede they cannot catch Obama. Their only hope is the Super Delegates, and a growing chorus of them have stated unequivocally they will not overturn the winner of the pledged delegate count.
I know you’re spinning so hard that to your point of view everyone else is spinning, but at least try to remember the rules. You DO remember the rules, don’t you?

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Morningside
Actually they are some polls now that show Obama ahead in PA, but it is certain he cut her big lead down to single digits.
Second if supporters begin to think that her funds are drying up, then they start to withhold money, nobody wants to put their money into a loosing proposition. Not the big boys anyway.
So the perception of loosing fulfills itself.

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Neither Hillary nor Obama can be trusted with the safety and security of this nation, and the majority of American voters know it. While the Democratic party implodes into a miasmic quagmire of mutual slime, slam, vituperation and recrimination between two first-term Senators whose only claims to legitimacy are dueling versions of identity politics, John McCain, the only person left in the race with the qualifications and experience to occupy the Oval Office, is running an honest and decent campaign that is worthy of the American people, and they will reward him by choosing him as our next President.

Posted by: Salamantis | April 5, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Jackt51
that is so funny i am still laughing
The Queen should abdicate her throne
In history the minions would scream long live the Queen…Her we are yelling say good bye to the Queen
Obama08

Posted by: lauren | April 5, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Back the empty suit, flim flam man and watch him get humiliated in the GE. I guess Michelle can then go back to feeling un-proud to be an American.

Posted by: Jack | April 5, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Don’t fall for the tripe these two candidates are feeding you. Vote for a person who actually cares for the public as much as he cares for himself.

Posted by: Turku Wren | April 5, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Boy she just dosen’t seem to have a firm grasp of reality does she? She’s been screaming the same thing for over a month and nothing has changed because the DNC is going to stand firm that they will not allow a faulty vote to effect the outcome of this race. Her numbers all down all over, she is at her lowest in trust polls and her unlikability is almost off the charts and she does not get it. People want to play fair. They do not want a winner at any cost. The do not want to see someone act like the school yard bully.
FL and MI votes will count if she decides to let them but much like her decision to disenfranchise them a year and half ago, when she thought she would not need them, she is unwilling to let them count unless it benefits her.
No one, and I mean this honestly, no one could say MI was fair. No one though some do try.
She is getting desperate and it is so awful to see.

Posted by: Sam | April 5, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

He’s raised and spent all those millions of dollars and yet Hillary is still right there. Why aren’t more people jumping on the “yes we can” express?

Posted by: Mack | April 5, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

A self proclaimed uniter that belongs to a black separatist church is not going to win too many votes in middle America.

Posted by: Mack | April 5, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Tony,
That is correct, but you will notice that Obama id still the choice of the Democratic Party and he still stand favorably with McCain, So either the 56% are either being less then truthful or it don’t matter.
Think about that; how could Obama loose 56% of Hillary’s supporters, that is roughly 25% of the democratic primary voters, and still be leading or neck to neck with McCain and still be ahead of Hillary in the polls.

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Last time I looked, the DNC was
outranked by the Constitution of the United States…… and does not have the right nor the power to dis-enfranchise the ability of even ONE citizen to vote!
Here we have a situation wherein the population of two states is effectively
erased from the electorate…..
and that’s OK…. WITH WHOM????
Not with HIllary followers!
We don’t expect the followers of B O to to do anything to re-establish the rights of these voters; they’re too busy working on the rights of races….
(just not election races!!!!)
A funny thing about this dumb situation is that B O was the ONLY candidate who advertised during their early voting… and still didn’t win!!!
Oh NO!!!! Could THAT be the reason he won’t push for the rights of these citizens???
Wow! What a President he would make…N O T!!!!
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!

Posted by: questioner | April 5, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Florida is slightly different, as all candidates names were on the ballot, but in Michigan Hillary’s was the only name on the ballot. And even in Florida no-one really campaigned in that state, so neither is really a ‘fair’ election in a way that we would recognise as democratic and fair, and the voters of both states knew at the time they voted that delegates were not going to be seated based on those results. Its really Clinton, not Obama who is acting like Bush, and trying to use any argument possible to win this election, never mind what the popular vote, or even the delegate count says. Honestly I genuinely believe the next president of the USA will be either Barack Obama or John McCain. If Hillary tricks herself to the nomination, it will mean nothing as she will lose, no matter what she said to Bill Richardson.

Posted by: markymark | April 5, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

If Obama won MI and FL and he was behind on the popular vote, do you honestly think his campaign would not fight to have those votes counted. Do you honestly think that you Obama voters would criticize him? Do you honestly think you wouldn’t want those votes counted? Every vote should count.

Posted by: Loretta | April 5, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

questioner
Primaries do not count as votes. They’re simply an arbitrary way for a party to nomonate a candidate. Fact it, a party doesn’t need to have primary votes and a candidate doesn’t need a party.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 5, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Desperate, desperate, desperate. It’s already over, and Hillary doesn’t seem to know. Wonder what her real goal is? Maybe she will write a book (sham deal of course) next year and let us know what she hoped to accomplish.

Posted by: rco | April 5, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Tired of playing the game MY CANDIDATE IS LESS DIRTY THAN YOUR CANDIDATE? Make a difference.

Posted by: Turku Wren | April 5, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Well she is correct in one thing, that is if she keeps fighting it is doubtful that Obama can gain enough delegates to win outright.
What she realy hopes for is a major screw up by the Obama Campaign. You can bet that her capaign is going to the well to look for something. They are digging.

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Texas Voter, There is no spin, if she is successful in winning a half million more votes than Obama, the Supers will consider that and who can be stronger in the electoral college vote. Also if she wins by good margins Obama will only be ahead by 50 or so delegates. He cannot get to 2024 without the help of the super delegates, so the race is far from over, so now you can go ahead and spin the Obama win anyway you want. He hasn’t won anything YET.

Posted by: Jay | April 5, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

she won because there was no “real election”
Look at the numbers in the polls before every state primary…Hillary’s numbers are the same as in Florida (Michigan is a joke because he was not even on the ballot)…
If it had been a real election those numbers would have moved just like every other state… in fact if Clinton hadn’t used this as her own tool for her own benefit…we could have probably had an election.
She played these states and the supers aren’t stupid they see what happened… She is manipulating a situation.
Those popular votes don’t count because it is imperative that all candidates get to introduce themselves…that is why they call it a “beauty contest” …
unfortunately the Florida and Michigan democratic parties should have never had those elections in the first place when the democratic national committee (and Hillary Clinton) told them they wouldn’t count and Hillary didn’t care.
She cares now only because it could help her if she looks like she is fighting for them…when it is obvious to those (even those who won’t admit itnefariously) outside she is only fighting for her own position.

Posted by: dl | April 5, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Jimmy carters family wants Barack Obama
Murtha says if she doesnt get the numbers Barack will win.
Barack Obama08

Posted by: lauren | April 5, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Hillary fans.
The game is up and your candidate was a victim of elitists who have hijacked the democratic party. Someboy said above that she’s ok with Obama if Hillary doesn’t make it. Such a person doesn’t have a good idea about what the party stands for or anything about its history.
So sad.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 5, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

the point is if those states had been a real election just like theothers Obama probably would have either tied her or won…but now she swept in there and immediately started manipulating a situation to make it look like she cared about the “voters”…she cared about the votes…those were not real elections because they did not allow those people to meet all the candidates so they voted for the woman they knew from being the first lady for 8 years.
She did not win a popular vote in either state because it was not a real election and unfortunately because of all this twisting and manipulation (typical and why we need to change) she goes back on what she said.
Sen Clinton does not stand up when it counts …she stands up when it is good for her personally…
A real leader stands up then not using it to manipulate a system which then tears apart a party.

Posted by: dl | April 5, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Jay,
I just don’t see the math. Setting aside MI and FL (Because Howard Dean has said time and time again he would not honor those results), I just don’t see where she makes up the delegates in the remaining 10 contests. She would have to win each and every single contest by over 65% just to catch up, and as I stated earlier, even if by some miracle she even closes to 100 delegates (almost a mathematical impossibility at this point), the Super Delegates will not back a candidate behind in pledged delegates.
I do agree with you, it is not over. We must play the string out. I suspect rather strongly, however, that come June 3rd, it will be official. This is assuming that the steady stream of Super Delegates already moving toward Obama has not turned into a torrent.

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Ed Randell Says he likes Obama and if he gets it he will support him.
Hillary’s support is not as strong as she paints it. That is why she keeps coming back with this and that. I think PA could end it for her. If Obama keeps coming on like he has the last week or so It will finish it for her.

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

by the way does everyone know that superdelegates and the committee that created them were created to make the party “more democratic” and to bring in more of the party to vote… superdelegates and the committee (and you can check this with the official documents in the formation of that committee,,,rather than taking Ferraro’s complete twisting of the purpose of them) …those superdelegates were supposed have reponsibility and “strengthen accountability to the members of the party and voters”…
Superdelegates are there to make sure no one plays switcharoonie with delegates responsibilities to their constituents or someone who twists the numbers …
that is in the paragraph for why the Hunt Commision (the commission that created the supers)…why it was founded.

Posted by: dl | April 5, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

WestCoastMessenger -
D-E-L-E-G-A-T-E-S. Nothing else determines the winner. Nothing.

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Michigan and Florida do count. 2.3 million Democrats voted in those states and will vote again in Nov. Any Democrats who think they don’t exist are not interested in winning the white house in Nov.

Posted by: s.b. | April 5, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

SJ – What a wonderful world that would be…

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

WCM
She is running out of states.
Her campaign is broke.
Her support among the super delegates is soft.
Her Campaign is in disarray.
Her poll numbers are looking worse by the day. Her leads in PA and Indiana are disappearing, she is sinking further in NC

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Well if there was not an official election why does Obama want a 50/50 split? What is he splitting votes that never happened, so he want the rewards of this illegal activity, he wants a prize from a race he claims he did not enter?
Nothing from nothing leave nothing so what exactly is he wanting to share if he knows these votes do not count?

Posted by: SJ | April 5, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

IF OBAMA GETS THE NOMINATION,IT WILL BE THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AS WE KNOW IT…
REMEMBER THE SOUTH?????IT WAS SOLID DEMOCRATIC. NOW IS SOLID REPUBLICAN..
WE MUST READ HISTORY..
DEMOCRATS MAKE THE SAME MISTAKES OVER AND OVER AGAIN….
ARE THEY EVER LEARN???????

Posted by: NIcholas | April 5, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

FL and MI were not elections so exactly what was it that happened there ???

Posted by: SJ | April 5, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

sj…a fifty fifty split means he wants the state there and to participate but it wasn’t a real election…and they should hold there state accountable number one because the rules were set up a long time before Dean had any kind of say really…this came out of the dealings of the last chairperson…and who was that? oh yeah. This was done two years before the election… the governor could not step in front of a party’s election they could have brought to court if he tried to do that and they would have quickly won.
They wanted their state to be more important…that’s why but unfortunately that went against party rules…and we could have settled this fairly if Hillary hadn’t run down there after a fake election (and after she both looked like she may lose and she said they wouldn’t count) and started saying she was fighting for their votes to count… as they were…ugh.
Now the problem couldn’t even be fixed.
and this is the candidate you want to elect…because “she is a fighter”…

Posted by: dl | April 5, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

I guess you all can’t wait but what else can we do I hope Hillary wins she will be the best President besides your all young OBama is to so why can’t we just put Hillary first then OBama

Posted by: Bishop | April 5, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

SJ
FL and MI were elections…they just weren’t real elections …you have to give voters an opportunity to meet the candidates…otherwise they are voting for the candidate that was the First Lady for 8 years. That is what the numbers have shown in EVERY state before voters got to meet the candidates.
It wasn’t a real election.

Posted by: dl | April 5, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

SJ
You have to get used to it.
In MI Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot. Sounds like a 3rd world election to me. One candidate
In Fl there was no Campaigning. How does a relative unknown go up against the likes of Hillary Clinton without a chance to talk with the voters?
Bottom line is that Hillary new they wouldn’t count, and now all of a sudden she shows empathy?

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Really so the ballot with the vote on property taxation. With respect to homestead property, that tax resolution that was included was not a real resolution ?
Geez I wonder if it passed it sure looked like a official ballot to me.

Posted by: SJ | April 5, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

SJ
The rules were set up in 2006. Hillary had two years to complain about it, She didn’t, your Governor didn’t, Maybe you did I do not know.

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Well I have four sister’s who live in Fl. and if thier votes don’t count guess what thier voting MCcain one is a nurse in Merrit Island One is a teacher one is a Pastor and a stay at home Mother. and they have many friends who are saying they will not vote Democratic

Posted by: Bishop | April 5, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Am just asking how can Property Tax Exemptions; Limitations on Property Tax Assessments part be official, which was passed 64% to 36%.
Yet the Presidential Preference Primary not be a real election? People came out to vote and voted on both matters, so why should one side count and the other does not?

Posted by: SJ | April 5, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

If Senator Clinton’s name was not on the ballot, would you call what we had here a fair election? Do you live in Michigan? Honestly, those of you who don’t live here should mind your own business – we have never asked you to revote your elections. Nobody here is really complaining about this issue. Why? Because we all knew that this was going to happen! It was repeated over and over, but our leaders here wanted an earlier say in the election. And guess what, it worked. Senator Clinton and the media were claiming Michigan as a state she won until March 4th. She has gotten plenty of political mileage out of us. But we are fair people in Michigan and we play by the rules – to pretend that the election here was something that it wasn’t is misleading.
For democrats and independents who wanted their vote to count, the GOP primary was available and the son of a former governor was on the ballot.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

I agree this is crazy and Hillary was not behind when the Fl took place she won on super tuesday but like all things the media has done nothing but give praise to Obama

Posted by: Bishop | April 5, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

@Bishop:
I agree that the media gave a pass to Senator Obama earlier partly from his lofty ideals, partly from resentment to the Clintons, and partly to keep things interesting for them. They are doing the same for Senator McCain now, I think most would agree.
But fair is fair and I’m not speaking for Florida, but Michigan’s presidential primary was so screwed up this year that it is painful to watch it being brought up ad nauseum. Anyone claiming the contrary really seems silly from the perspective of those living here.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Its simple the democrats don’t have to count the Fl votes they can leave them out but if they do and Obama is their nominee he cant win a GE without Florida now can he??
If some of you think he can let me know how.

Posted by: SJ | April 5, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

She signed – those votes would not count.
So follow Your decision and do not play games with public.
If You can.
If You can not – GET OUT and write Your phony books.
GET OUT.

Posted by: Linda,Fl | April 5, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

@SJ:
I think your point is correct that Senator Obama will have a hard time winning Florida in the general election (whether or not they count the votes in the primary). Did you see Tim Russert’s analysis on how each candidate plans to win the general electoral vote? It was a nice breakdown on strategy by each group. After watching it, my impression was that any of the three candidates could win. I think, though, for the democrats to have a chance they will need to run a 50-state campaign this year.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Why should Hillary drop out. All it will take for her to win the nomination is one video clip of Obama dancing in the aisle while Wright delivered one of his hate speeches.

Posted by: Bil | April 5, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

FL has 27 electorial votes and MI 17 total 44 votes, that is an awful lot of votes to drop and still hope to win a GE.
There is going to be a lot of pissed people in these states that did not like what was done and they will show it, people just have to understand what is happening now means nothing, its the electoral votes that gives you a president.
So we can argue all we want now, slam each other but if your favored candidate cannot hold these electorial votes then the democrats will lose this election.

Posted by: SJ | April 5, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

This slow decomposition of the Clinton brand serves a greater purpose.
Little by little, all Americans are finally coming to understand how pathetic and dishonest the Clintons actually were all these years.
Like other con artists in history, the Clintons were masterful in weaving fact with fiction. Had Hillary not run, they could have dined out on their false but well-crafted image in perpetuity.
They have now pushed the envelope one too many times. In return, donors, intellectuals, the media, and now African Americans are finally aware how they’ve been manipulated and used all these years.
History will not be gentle with these two sociopaths.

Posted by: Gorgon '08 | April 5, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Geez here we go again some of you just don’t understand how the electorial college works, well that is very sad and it will be even sadder when you see the results of the GE.

Posted by: SJ | April 5, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Face the truth Hillary fans!
The democratic party has been hijacked by progressive (liberal) minorities. With their friends in the media, your poor candidate didn’t have a chance. Honestly now, which alternative best suits your political disposition? Moderate republicans or elitist democrats bent on socializing the world.
Think hard!

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 5, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Obama thinks he can replace Fl with mid-west states like COL. but if Romney is MCcain’s vp the mid west is not that much in play you can’t get by without two states it is a big risk he is taking.Four other states went ahead and they could of had a revote.

Posted by: Bishop | April 5, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Michigan will be a blue state this year – it doesn’t matter if it’s Clinton, Obama or Pinocchio. The rest of the country talks about recession – we’ve been living through it. Our economy is the pits. The price of oil/gas is killing us not only on a daily basis, but because it is killing the auto industry. Home foreclosures here and falling property values. It’s awful, really.
But most people around here don’t complain, they just work harder because that is what Americans do. And any sitting President’s party will fare poorly here in November – most of us blame George Bush. He doesn’t talk to the big 3, his policies don’t help Michigan and it seems that he has a grudge against us because John Engler couldn’t make us a red state for him. So, John McCain may be a good guy but people here will vote their pocketbooks. McCain admits he doesn’t know anything about the economy, offers a poor man’s version of “i feel your pain”, but so far comes across as insincere or incapable of fixing the problems we have.
Now, with that said, most of the problems we have our outside of any President’s control. But the buck has to stop somewhere…

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

MIguy – I watched the same analysis by Russert. By expanding the map for the delegates, Obama has a realistic chance of winning even if he does not carry FL and OH.
McCain also has a realistic chance. I am looking forward to the General Election. It should be a spirited debate.

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

@Bishop and SJ:
Agree with you both. Ignoring the electoral college is perilous and John McCain’s VP choice is a HUGE deal. I doubt he chooses Romney, because it hurts him with evangelicals. My guess is he chooses a bona fide right-winger to “balance” his ticket with Republicans.
As versed as you are in the electoral college, doesn’t it strike you as odd that Senator Clinton basically skipped some states earlier? I think those of us that are watching this worry that she will pull an Al Gore and John Kerry and not campaign strongly in all 50 states. If she had campaigned more in the states she glossed over, then she would probably be leading now.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

@Texas Voter:
It will be interesting – no doubt. My only hope is that no matter who wins, the country moves forward on solving the issues that are important. Although Senator McCain is likeable now, he will end up being a likeable guy who loses if he can’t come up with concrete things he wants to change next year.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

MIguy
If the president’s influence is national, why is Michigan so far behind? Could it be you state government is inept? That wouldn’t be surprising in a state that’s heavily union oriented. Stands to reason that industry will go somewhere else.
That seems to be the story of your state. Government is mostly local and the blame starts locally.

Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 5, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

MIguy – Well said. She ran as poorly run a campaign as I’ve seen in a long time. Remember, last year she was all but crowned the nominee. That, combined with the smart campaign run by Obama is ultimately what did her in.

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

MIguy – I agree. I like McCain because he is a centrist, and I like Obama because he is willing to work with the opposition, but political dogma is dogcrap this year. Show me what you are going to do. There will be very tough questions facing them both in the General Election.
Again, I look forward to it.

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

@Surelock Homes:
You’re exactly right and you understood my innuendo at the end of my post. The problem in our state is our local government, it is the poor business decisions by the Big 3, and it is Congress’ inability to pass meaningful legislation.
People ascribe too much power to the President. However, the President is the lightning rod irrespective of what they can or cannot do. The dissatisfaction people have here will come down on whomever is in charge. Don’t get me wrong, I am not so naive as to think that changing one job will solve all of our problems – but most suspect that a change of perspective that comes with overhauling the Oval Office will bring something better than we have now.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

It is interesting and I suppose that is why Dean is ticked I can’t think after living in Ks Tx Co and now Ga that theese states would go blue. And that is a worry.

Posted by: Bishop | April 5, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

maybe some of you need a REMINDER that last October – before the primary’s started – the Hillary Clinton signed the same pledge as ever other one of the candidates for the Democtratic presidential nomination
She said she knew these votes would not count
This country cannot afford another President who lies to us -
There is no conversation to be had
This is the plain, simple, irrefutable fact
After the nomination is settled either May 6th or June 7th – the MI and FL delegation will be seated when thay cannot and should not and will not impact the outcome of the democratic nomination
48 state managed to play by the rules -
what kind of a message is this to the country?
I get alot of you are shills and trolls – but come on – don’t you have to look in the mirror every now and then?

Posted by: alison | April 5, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Here’s one crazy thing I think is already starting: President Bush/Cheney are actually now trying to get something done, rather than leaving the country a complete trainwreck for next year. Whatever you think of them, at least they are starting to try and get things done.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

And I see seating them after is fair and balanced not

Posted by: Bishop | April 5, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Those delegates from FL and MI will be seated at the convention and their voices will be heard. They just won’t influence who the nominee will be, that’s all.

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Quit Hillary, there is no way to catch up and all this contorting to try get enough votes is just making you look like a win at all costs sort of person, and we already have one of those in the white House.

Posted by: SC4ME | April 5, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

@Bishop:
Again, no disagreement with you. It will take some new math for Senator Obama to win. But it really comes down to who votes; in the ‘contested’ 2004 election only 55% of eligible voters actually voted. If one can swing this by a few percent in either direction, then it’s anyone’s ballgame.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

MIguy – To your point, I think these two presumptive nominees change the political landscape. The Right Wing of the Republican Party was shown to lose its once vice like grip on the Party, and the Democrats have shown they can expand their base into Independents and moderate Republicans.
In essence, these two candidates will battle for the same votes. I personally think it’s going to be one of the most substantive elections we’ve seen in a long time.

Posted by: Texas Voter | April 5, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

@SC4ME:
It would be foolish for her to quit before the Pennsylvania primary. If she wins by 20 points, she might end up winning the whole thing. If she wins by 5 points or less then it is really over. It will probably end up somewhere in the middle and then the other primaries become the next to voice their opinion. There is nothing wrong with this going on longer, so long as they limit the negative stuff against each other and ratchet the pressure up against McCain (two voices to his one is an advantage at this point that they are not playing up).

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

@Texas Voter:
Completely agree and hope the same. I think there will be some fireworks in the upcoming general election Presidential debates. I think Senator McCain is going to need to work hard on not looking ‘old’. The Letterman gig was good for him, but he has got to be careful lest he become the ‘cranky old grampa’. He needs to be ‘kind, safe grampa’ that you want to go fishing with, and that you trust completely for no real reason. I doubt the Democrats will let the latter happen easily.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Count all the votes in all the states.
Anything less is undemocratic.

Posted by: Jayhawk | April 5, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Rules are rules. Delegates are not bound to the electorate in most states. Several ballot votes have been necessary to nominate some of our past Presidents. This is the norm. An additional 76 unpledged delegates can be appointed by party leaders when necessary and just may happen in this case because the race is so close. Superdelegates make a decision for the party based on their judgement. Popular vote tallies can be considered by superdelegates as can any factor they deem appropropriate. MI and FL delegates can still be seated within the rules based on court order and/or credentials committee decision but the votes of the people are official. When Obama was behind in delegates, no one called for him to step aside. He stated early in the race that if he can get within 100 delegates or so he will continue through the convention and no one dissed him for that. In other words, if a man is ambitious and calculating he is heralded. Clinton is working within the rules and fighting for her supporters through the convention. The MSM and Obama supporters diss her for doing that. In other words, if a woman is ambitious and calculating she is looked at in a negative light. Shouldn’t we all take a hard look at what we are doing with this unconscious sexist perception and work hard to not judge people based on gender as much as race?

Posted by: mixed-american | April 5, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Westcoast Messenger, As I said before, rules really do matter. If Obama was able to campaign in Michigan and Florida, he might have well won them. Hill has name recognition. Ok, then let us forget about those for a minute. If Hill is so concerned about Michigan and Florida getting their say, then why is she advocating that delegates can vote against the will of the people? What’s the point in the any state voting?

Posted by: gayle in California | April 5, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Since when is the US democratic? The framers of the Constitution didn’t trust democracies implicitly and set us up as a republic and gave a significant amount of power to the “Old Guard” in the Senate. The President is voted on by the electoral college and, as we all recall from 2000, their votes can go against the popular vote of their State. Our political parties also mirror this: superdelegates are not democratic and ‘winner-take-all’ primaries are designed to bring quick resolution to the nominating process.
So when we go overseas for the sake of “spreading democracy”, we should all take a good hard look at what we do first.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

It is over. Clinton is out of her league. She has completely lost it. She has played the victim once to often. She is totally out of control and desperate. Watch as she self destructs.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

By the way, to clarify the above, I am not saying any electoral votes went against State popular votes. Rather, some Gore supporters made it well-known that this was within their right (hoping to swing the election to him because of the popular vote). Now, does any of this sounds like deja vu in the context of what is happening now?

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Jac13,
Hillary cares about the voters not only cares about winning.
Obama only cares about winning that’s what happened when he made promises in every state.
In Idaho, he promised not to take away their guns.
In California, he promised to illegal immigrants to give them driver lisences.
Do you think he will keep his promises after he become a president?

Posted by: crisis08 | April 5, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

@Thinking:
It’s kinda sad as she should be running a much better campaign than this. The weird swings from ‘fighter’, to anger, to sadness, to dismissive just don’t help her cause. It is very possible the media is focusing on these things subtly because she is a woman and the subliminal context is “she is too emotional”. But I keep getting the same sense you are: that of a campaign with the walls closing in and no way out. Who knows, though, a big win in PA and everything could change.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

@crisis08:
Your loyalty to Senator Clinton is admirable, but she is like every other politician and changes her message to suit her purpose. She cares more about winning than voters. I’m not saying this in a bad way, but more matter-of-fact.

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Well Crisis08, at least he might wait until after he is elected before he breaks promises/lies, and not insult our intellegence. Your Hillary girl does is only days apart during the campaign. Does that mean we are suppose to have faith that her lies will stop AFTER she gets elected. My intellegence tells me otherwise.

Posted by: gayle in California | April 5, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Jack51,
Hey,,,that was not April fool.
Obama supporters got paid to knock on millions doors in Texas and urged people to change their minds.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 5, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

There is no win for Hillary in PA, she knows it and it shows. Her numbers are dropping too fast now, people get the sense of it.
In trying to destroy Obama, she took her self down.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | April 5, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

@Thinking:
I think you’re right – she has got to fight the perception of a sinking ship if she’s going to pull off the victory she needs in PA. She hasn’t had a good weekend/couple weeks but there is still plenty of time. Time will tell…

Posted by: MIguy | April 5, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Gayle in CA,
Obama lied about the oil company ad and he that is on now.
The Ad still air everyday.
He should take it way from now on and apologize to public.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 5, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

The tainted elections that were publicly declared as invalid. That everyone knew would not count including Senator Clinton herself ABSOLUTELY MUST NOT BE COUNTED!!!!!!!!!
IT IS AN OUTRAGE AND I CAN’T BELIEVE THAT EVEN HER OWN SUPPORTERS AGREE WITH THIS IDEA OF COUNTING A TAINTED ELECTION
THAT AFFECTS EVERYONE INCLUDING VOTERS IN MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA WHO DID NOT VOTE BECAUSE THEY KNEW IT WOULDN’T COUNT!!!
The American people could easily file a llawsuit against Senator Clinton or the DNC and declare Clinton and invalid nominee should she get her way and somehow corrupt this election.
There are many arguments to be made as to why her suggestion is absolutely ludicrous and frankly insane!
The only fair solution considering the circumstances involved is to seat the Florida and Michigan delegates 50/50 or don’t seat them at all!
I am not sure that the superdelegates of either state should be seated as they may have had some power to affect why this happened in their states. They are the ones who messed things up for the voters of their states, NOT Senator Obama or the rest of us.
AND I am sick of this popular vote idea leaving out caucus votes as I live in a cacus state and our votes deserve to be counted our elections were completely valid!!!
STOP LETTING SENATOR CLINTON TRY TO DICTATE AND CHANGE THE RULES OF THIS PROCESS!!! IT WILL DISENFRANCHISE MUCH MORE THAN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN!!!
ANY ATTEMPT FOR HER TO DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN WIN ACCORDING TO DELEGATES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED INVALID AND THE RULES COMMITTEE SHOULD REJECT IT!
NO REWARDING POEPLE TRY TO CHEAT THEIR WAY INTO THE WHITEHOUSE!!! I HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS EGOIC AMBITION THAT PRETENDS TO CARE ABOUT ANYONE OTHER THAN THE ONE WHO HAS TO WIN AT ALL COSTS!! THAT IS NOT SERVICE TO AMERICA! THAT DOES NOT LIFT UP THIS COUNTRY AND HELP IT HEAL AND MOVE FORWARD!
CHANGE I DO BELIEVE IN!!!
OBAMA ’08

Posted by: LDB | April 5, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Let me see, how many times has Hillary lied?
more experience
ready on day one
lied on Bill Richardson
Still says she won Texas
Stated that she voted for the war based on the facts, she didn’t even read the materials that were available.
stated that Michigan didn’t matter until she left her name on the ballot
Supported Nafta until she got to Ohio.

Posted by: kathleen | April 5, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

It is amazing how biased Hillary supporters become,they don’t see or care about the lack of integrity. How can anyone say Hillary won in Michigan when she was the only dem.candidate on the ballot??And how could disenfranchising the nation by pleading to Obama’s pledged delegates to support her be ethical?? Anyone??

Posted by: babette | April 5, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

I think her biggest problem is that she never seems to be on the minority side of any issue. We’ve all been on the wrong side of an issue at one point, but it doesn’t seem to be something that afflicts her. The Iraq War vote is obvious, but most made that mistake. She could have said she was for NAFTA and defended her position, but rather said that she was secretly against it. It’s politically expedient to always be for popular things, but ultimately I think Americans are smart enough to respect those with different opinions than our own. Maybe one of the very astute Clinton supporters here can correct me on this perception?

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

I have a very good solution for EVERYONE. Let the election be between OBAMA and UNCOMMITED in North Carolina or in PA. Count the votes in Michigan and Florida as they were. This would be the fairest solution(probably more favorable to Clinton as NC has only 111 which is less than MI).

Posted by: bkkarna | April 6, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Maybe it is time for Hillary’s super delegates to step up to the plate and just say no to Bill and Hillary.
OOPS, I forgot, the clintons will than say they looked me in the eye and said they would never leave us.

Posted by: kathleen | April 6, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Hillary supporters: Stop threatening (a) that Michigan and Florida will vote Republican if the votes from the illegal elections are not counted and (b) that you will vote for McCain if Hillary is not the nominee!
Your threats carry no weight and the more you throw your tantrum, the more Hillary bleeds support. If you want to vote for Mr. 100 Years In Iraq, knock yourself out. Hillary has lost and no amount of screaming will change that!

Posted by: Yvonne | April 6, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Delegate races are similar to electoral races in that the votes cast are simply guidelines for the delegates. The same is true for electors in the GE. People cast votes to provide a guideline for those responsible for electing a nominee or a President. Superdelegates work for the party not the people. Only half the superdelegates are elected officials worried about re-election. Thinking on these points, and trying to make sure I am not being a sexist, I think Clinton is doing exactly what she should be doing and that is working hard for her supporters and the country.
=====================================
Consider all votes!
Clinton 08!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 6, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Hillary signed a pledge (an oath) stating that she agreed that FL,MI did not count. So what has changed since she made that pledge?

Posted by: oreguy | April 6, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

@Yvonne:
I agree that the “my second favorite candidate is John McCain” thing is irritating as it rings hollow (why isn’t he their first choice?) I also agree that Michigan at least will be a blue state this year irrespective of the delegates being seated. Florida has been a red state in recent history and I see no reason it will change – but one would think Senator Clinton has a better chance than Senator Obama there.
But I would encourage you to not antagonize Clinton supporters. Their support will be necessary if Senator Obama receives the nomination.

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

When people make the argument that Obama wasnt on the ballot in Michigan, can they explain exactly why he wasnt on the ballot?
I mean if the primary was not going to mean anything, why take your name off the ballot and insult the voters of that state?
You have to count the votes.

Posted by: Joan | April 6, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Rules are Rules. I sick and tired of HRC changing them to benifit her, HRC does not care about anything or anybody, she only care about winning. I think now Super Delegates this week will come out more against her, because she is trying to say, since all the votes were not counted, Obama win is not ligit. This is very sicking to me, I’m so glad that in PA, I will be able to vote against her, where as before I was totally for her.

Posted by: Laura | April 6, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Has she not figured out yet that even if she counts those states the DNC will not. Nor will the supers give her the votes because it is a faulty win and everyone but her knows it. This is really sad to watch. This makes her 10th “changing” of rules and things she has to do to win…and it is all going to be for nought.

Posted by: Sam | April 6, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

@Joan:
Obama, Edwards and others took their name off the ballot as a measure to reassure voters of Iowa and New Hampshire of their primacy in the nominating process. They would have done the same in Florida if election rules allowed.
In hindsight, her failure to appease the Iowa voters and her failure to effectively organize for the caucus there may explain the demise of her campaign (if it fails). Obama’s victory there, coupled with his speech afterwards, put a dent in the inevitability of her victory.
Removing their names from the ballot here was political maneuvering, but nobody here was “insulted” because we knew our votes didn’t count. Every campaign and candidate (including Senator Clinton) said so. What would be insulting is for someone to come in after-the-fact and pick and choose only the votes they want.

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

@mpwdc:
Please don’t assume that people are ignoring electoral college votes in this discussion. Senator Clinton can be ‘swiftboated’ just as easily and some would say that is occurring right now with the Bosnia thing. But if the democrats once again are putting all of their hopes on Ohio and Florida, why should they expect a different outcome from 2000 and 2004?

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Florida and Michigan broke the DNC rules by scheduling their primaries in January. ALL of the candidates agreed not to campaign in those states. Sen. Obama went further and had his name removed from the ballot, but HRC did not. At the time, HRC was the presumptive nominee so she didn’t give a damn about Florida and Michigan – she figured that she had the nomination locked up and wouldn’t need them (let them eat cake!!!). Now she NEEDS the Florida and Michigan votes if she has a hope of overtaking Sen. Obama so she is disavowing her previous disdain for the voters in those states. I feel sorry for the Florida and Michigan voters, but it is not the fault of Sen. Obama because it was their own state parties that wanted to move their primaries ahead so that they could have more “influence” in selecting a nominee (can’t say as I blame them because Iowa and New Hampshire have a disproportionate influence in that regard). However, I think this flap only goes to illustrate what I’ve always felt about HRC and Bill, they want, need, and crave POWER and are willing to go to any lengths to obtain it. She does not deserve the nomination much less the presidency…

Posted by: TommyReb | April 6, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Can you say Rezko????
Can you say Ayers???
Khalidi?
Wright?
Auchi?
Obama cannot win in November.
Deserve is not the point. Winning the election in November is the point.

Posted by: mpwdc | April 6, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

The party can not elect Obama without the base the AA are a large part and the women are the second large part we do bring with us our husbands we have made up this party for the last fourty years and if you think you can do it without us go for it but you might want to take in the rallys Hillary and Bill they are also large but the Media finds it hard to report on it . Pa my home state and I was born in Bucks county and she has a very good chance there and many supporters waiting to vote for her it would be better if we all got along but you have not been very nice to the other half of the party you do not see us calling Obama bad names bad is no respect on your behalf.

Posted by: Bishop | April 6, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Any of the candidates can win. Again, to my point above, the argument for the last two elections has been about winning Ohio and Florida and it hasn’t gotten the democrats very far. What would be different this time? What makes Senator Clinton more electable when she is just as, if not more, vulnerable to “swiftboating”?

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

@Bishop:
Exactly – people need to stop calling each other names when they are ultimately on the same side of the issues. Both sides will need each other to win the general election.

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

MIGuy: I will NOT try to appease these Clinton supporters who attempt to blackmail the DNC with their threats!
Polls say that 30% of them will not vote for Obama if HRC doesn’t get the nomination. Why? Because he won? Because he played by the rules that were established before the first vote was cast? Because he ran a brilliant campaign?
These people are unfair and unreasonable and I am frankly disgusted by their efforts to excuse HRC’s disgusting shennanigans! She should say “I fought the good fight” but I lost instead of behaving so pathetically. She has no shame. I’m embarrassed for her!
Who would imagine that a former first lady would exhibit so little dignity in her quest for power? The supporters who stand behind her as she makes a mockery out of this nomination contest are just as bad!

Posted by: Yvonne | April 6, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Regardless of rules: millions of voters that had no say about moving dates or anything else voted. Their votes should count. Period. Obama should have left his name on the ballot in Michigan. It was not the voters who broke the rules.If the Democrats want to win in November they need Florida and Michigan, no matter who the nominee is..
otherwise you can bet Florida and Michigan will go to McCain.

Posted by: mpwdc | April 6, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

MIguy,
What do you think Hillary supporters will support Obama in GE?
After Obama refused to count MI and FL?
After all the media has treated Hillary so badly.
After all the super delegates has betrayed her?
After Obama supporters treat Hillary supporters so badly?
So,,,think about those things.
If you all O’s supporters want us to support you in GE think what way you should behave.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 6, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

@mpwdc:
You clearly don’t live in Michigan. McCain didn’t beat Romney here. Our economy is in shambles and Michigan has been a blue state since 1992. Do you really think we are so silly here to cut off our nose to spite our face? Because of some dumb primary spat we would say, “Well shucks, now we hate the democrats and have to vote for someone we don’t agree with”? Does that really sound sensible?

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Actually, crisis08, I think the vast majority of Senator Clinton’s supporters will vote for Senator Obama if he is the nominee and vice-versa. There is more that unites the democrats than divides them.
If you want to vote for Senator McCain, that is your prerogative and he seems like a nice fellow. But if you are truly passionate in Senator Clinton’s or Obama’s issues, you will realize they both agree on nearly everything meaningful.
I agree that a lot of venom is slung in these blogs and agree that each side will need each other. But it is easy to focus on the ones yelling rather than seeing the ones you agree with.

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Romney won’t be running for Pres against the Dem nominee. No, I don’t live in Michigan but do have friends in the Detroit area supporting Hillary Clinton. I don’t think they will be happy if their votes don’t count for Hillary. They are not at all impressed with Obama. Who they will vote for in November I cannot say, but I would bet it won’t be Obama. Plenty of them voted for Hillary in the Primary. They want their votes counted.

Posted by: mpwdc | April 6, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Gayle in Ca,
I don’t think that question came from Hillary’s supporters.
As always as Clinton’s speech there was insider heckler.
At least Hillary did not take her kid to the anti American church and let the kid listen to all the hatred , unpatriotic speeches from the pastor.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 6, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Michigan was dumb enough to change their Primary date knowing they would be penalized so who knows what Michigan will do?

Posted by: mpwdc | April 6, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Crisis08
I am sorry that you think he lied about getting money from oil companies and lobbiest. You may not know that he received money from individuals in those oil companies, not the oil company itself. If you have contributed to any campaigns online, you would know that you have to agree that your donation is an individual one, not from any company. Obama has almost 1mil supporters that contribute. These oil guys are contributing just like me! So understand, these are people just like us! I know you are intellegent enough to know the distinction. It’s like my daughter selling girl scout cookies to my colleagues at work, and then the company firing me for taking money from the company. Do you really not get it?

Posted by: gayle in California | April 6, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

We keep circling around this over and over again with Hillary but if she had wanted the popular vote to count, why not state that before hand and encourage Obama to be on the ballot in Michigan? Is standing up for these voters in her mind (or anyone’s mind for that matter) really counting a popular vote of her against uncommitted in a contest that was purported as not being disqualified?
The real problem here is not that Hillary wants the popular vote to count in these two contests, it’s when she decided she should mention this to everyone else- after she won. Just like she never mentioned how undemocratic caucuses were until she repeatedly got outperformed in caucus states.
Hindsight is 20/20 but fortunately for democracy, you can’t change the rules of the game based on hindsight.

Posted by: Indy500 | April 6, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

I assume that your friends, just like everyone else here, wishes our state leaders didn’t put us in this mess. Every democrat and independent here wanted their votes to count, but if the election was flawed how can you count the votes? We actually could have had a caucus, but this didn’t fly with Senator Clinton’s campaign and would not have gotten the okay of our governor (a Clinton supporter). Yes, it is idiotic, but those are the rules of the game. If your friends vote for Senator McCain because of this then I would put it to you that they are not voting on the issues.

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

When will it be reported that without the two “identity politics” candidates in the race almost any other mainstream Dem who won the nomination would win the general election in a walk. And I do mean ANY mainstream Democrat. What we have instead is an African-american with virtually no relevant experience and the wife of a once popular Democratic president who amassed enough money to keep any serious competitors out.

Posted by: Jacknyc | April 6, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Joan, I turn your question around. Why was Hillary the only candidate to leave her name on the ballot? Obama wasn’t the only democrat running at the time who’s name wasn’t on the ballot. Give me a real honest answer rather than one dug up to support Hillary. Herein lies your credibility.

Posted by: gayle in California | April 6, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

MIguy,
I think it’s not that easy to stir everybody’s mind.
There is so much damage here while Mc Cain can take benefit from it.
I personaly have diappointed for all of this.
If Obama won this election I believe Hillary’s supporters will remain hurt because how the media and the way people treat her.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 6, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

@crisis08:
You’re right – ultimately that’s why I think that some Obama supporters misguidedly call for her to dropout so that the ‘healing’ can begin. This, however, only fuels the animosity. If this does go all the way to the convention, it may be too late. I honestly don’t think most Clinton/Obama supporters who say they will vote for McCain will do it; but I worry that they just wouldn’t vote at all. This has been the Republican strategy of late: let the Democrats build their candidates into saints, then show them the blemishes of their candidate and hope that just enough get discouraged and don’t vote. So neither Clinton nor Obama is perfect and thank goodness we are finding that out now rather than in October.

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

We Clinton supporters are not sore losers if Hillary is not the nominee.
But we examine and research the credentials of the candidates, regardless of Party affiliation and we go from there. If the next best candidate, in our opinion is MCCAIN, and if he happens to be Republican, so be it.

Posted by: mpwdc | April 6, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

@mpwdc:
More power to you, but I think that your statement applies generically to most voters. We ultimately only know our own vote. So vote your conscience, whomever that is, and then we should get behind the next President and get back to work.

Posted by: MIguy | April 6, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

MIguy: I agree. We should get behind the next President. The reason I made my statement as to why Hillary supporters may vote for McCain is because we have been bashed by Obama supporters as wanting revenge, wanting to hurt Obama. Not so, he is just not our choice as Hillary is not theirs. Many of us do not feel ‘married’ to the Democratic Party. We vote for the candidate that we feel will be best for the country. Obviously we may have differing reasons as to why we think one candidate would be better than another. Obviously Sen Clinton feels like the Presidency is worth fighting for and we will support her as long as she continues to fight. Maybe they should pull a wishbone on Flag Day, June 14th. I don’t know how it will be resolved but resolved it will be before Sept 1.

Posted by: mpwdc | April 6, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Miguy,
I think that is fair enough to Hillary to dropout the race after every state counts.
Remember even Obama said it in public she has a right to stay in the race .
do you want, after Obama become the president of US someday people say he won the election because of something fraud in this election ?
PS I talked to most of women and including my mother , they are very disappointed how American (great nation),still treat women differently.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 6, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

crisis08,
Please check your facts about the questioner to Chelsea. “I” heard him say in an interview that he asked the question so that Chelsea would have the opportunity to show how STRONG her mother is. I won’t even dignify an answer to the comment about Obama bringing his children to a typical Black congregational church. With all do respect, I am really only trying to clarify mistatements that you are making all over the place. You are sounding as unreal as Hillary. You just can’t be sincere.

Posted by: gayle in California | April 6, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

How can we possibly treat the popular vote as meaning ANYTHING when 1/3 of the states held CAUCUSES? We cannot count a ‘popular vote’ when so far fewer people vote in caucuses – it makes states like Iowa, Colorado, Washington, Nevada, etc. MEANINGLESS. Does the Clinton campaign not care about voters in these states?

Posted by: Bill | April 6, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Nancy Pelosi put it best when she said counting votes from a state that had 1 candidate on the ballot would be Stalinist. Many voters didnt vote in Michigan because their candidate wasnt on the ballot. Now she wants to count the vote even if it disenfranchises those voters. She will use every stupid lawyer trick in the book to win. She says that asking people to sacrifice and work together is not the way the world works. Well guess what. The world isnt working very well using her system. Time to try something new. Obama 08

Posted by: Scott | April 6, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

No matter who says what, excluding votes is a bad thing

Posted by: Jim Turney | April 6, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am

“Look out! I smell lawsuit brewing. It’s just a matter of time. Is this 2000 election redone for the DNC nomination? I think so…”
Clinton can’t win a lawsuit. She, along with all other candidates agreed to the ‘disenfranchisement’ of those states due to those states being in violation of party rules. Hillary could use a lawsuit to help cripple the party going into November, but she can’t use a lawsuit to overturn the rules set up by the DNC and agreed upon by the candidates.

Posted by: Michael | April 6, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Let me get this right. The court in Michigan threw out the results of the January Primary, ruling it unconstitutional. He did not order a recount, though. Non the less, the vote and tally are ruled out. So, how can Hillary, a lawyer, say that they still count? Florida, no such argument, but Michigan? What is she, a moron? Does she think people still get their news by word of mouth, (well maybe some of her supports do, hence their rabid support). These votes in Michigan do not count for squat! Nada! To purport otherwise is being dishonest! Is this what you see in a President? A liar? Haven’t you had enough of that for the past eight years? Is it the Democrats wish to have America become even more of a laughing stock to the World? Maybe Chaney should decide to run as the Republican incumbent. Seems that’s was the people want. Don’t see much of a difference between him and Hillary!

Posted by: Larry | April 6, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

Hillary is more of a cheater than a fighter.

Posted by: Vicky | April 6, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

I can understand why Hillary supporters will vote for McCain if she doesn’t win the nomination – after all, it is Hillary that is telling them that McCain is better qualified to be president than Obama…and her supporters believe her. Thanks a lot, Hillary…we now know how loyal you are to the Democratic Party – not.

Posted by: Vicky | April 6, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am

Hillary wants to disenfranchise 2 million voters in Florida and Michigan by having the original elections count.
“In a new study, Wharton School Assistant Prof. Gregory Nini and liberal author Glenn Hurowitz try to figure that out, based on voter turnout in other states. Their conclusion: Based on a statistical comparison with turnout in other states’ primaries, it appears that roughly two million more people would have voted in Florida and Michigan had they expected their delegates to be seated.

Posted by: Kristin | April 6, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am

Oh my gosh, she is right!!!
No one ever said the votes in Florida and Michigan didn’t count, the problem is that the votes don’t get converted into delegates.
At least not yet.
Hillary is right. The votes in both states have been certified by election officials and should be applied to the overall popular vote count for the various candidates.

Posted by: OhioNative | April 6, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am

The entire total popular vote count argument is MEANINGLESS, because it effectively disenfranchises caucus states where the overall number of votes is very small (10-100 times fewer votes than in primaries). That’s 15 STATES disenfranchised, how about that?!

Posted by: Jaka | April 6, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am

The difference….the 15 states chose to have caucuses. They chose to disenfranchise their own voters.
Florida and Michigan were disenfranchised by the DNC and a Republican State government. These states chose to have primaries.
This is America. The popular vote of Florida and Michigan must be included in the popular vote count. It would be illegal for the DNC to omit the popular vote count in the overall numbers.
If the DNC wants the nominee to be legitimate, then the popular vote of these states must be included since they were legally certified by their states. If the DNC does not also seat the delegates they are risking losing the general election. It is a tough decision. I hope they make the right unbiased decision.

Posted by: Louise | April 6, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am

NO WAY should popular vote count in MICHIGAN!
OBAMA wasn’t even on the BALLOT!
Someone STOP HER!
She’s lost it.

Posted by: Carl | April 6, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

America…please think. Mrs. Clinton and her Team are destructive to the moral fibre of the Country. PLEASE…THINK of the COUNTRY! Think of the last 8 years with ANOTHER LIAR in the WH! Listen to your better angels…please.

Posted by: sharon | April 6, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

If Hillary really cared about the voters of Michigan and Florida, she should have spoken out forcefully against them moving their primaries back when she was the frontrunner and presumptive nominee. It wasn’t an issue for her then because she assumed they would just be a rubber stamp on her coasting into the white house. Both states were warned of the consequences beforehand.

Posted by: kevin | April 6, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Hillary Clinton’s brazen dishonesty simply takes one’s breath away. It is pitiful and painful really, to see someone of her mature years conducting herself in such a dishonourble and undignified manner – and for all the world to see. What kind of a role model is she to other women, and to other professional women especially the younger generation of professional women? And what kind of message is she sending to young girls and especially teenagers who are at a stage in their lives where role models have such great influence – that if you desire something greatly, it is alright to be unscrupulous and to lie, cheat and steal for it? She keeps on repeating “I believe this country is worth fighting for.” What in God’s name does she even mean by that?! That this belief is unique to her? That her fellow presidential candidates do not believe that their country is worth fighting for? And neither does the man in the street? She also repeats often that “You don’t make difficult consequential change in America merely by wishing for it or hoping for it.” She really needs to stop making these kinds of silly statements. She need look no further than at the way Barack Obama has organised, is executing and is facing up to the challenges of his campaign to see that, indeed, making difficult and consequential change in America takes more than wishing and hoping for it!

Posted by: sarasoon | April 6, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

It amazing to me how “so called readers” can interpret the facts in so many different ways… this issue regarding Fla. and Mi. is mute..it’s over… the nominee will make the decision to seat or not to seat the delegates.. but the facts are the facts..they did it their way and now they must pay..Hillary knew the rules and now that she is grabing for straws she believes that if she says it-it becomes reality and maybe she can sway public opinion… GOODBYE HILLARY…It’s time for you to exit stage left…..

Posted by: Linda | April 6, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

“It’s clear, this election they’re having is not going to count for anything” – Hillary Clinton, in a radio interview in October.
Not so clear now she needs it to count for something of course.

Posted by: Aengil | April 6, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

If Hillary wants to determine this primary season on popular vote, than what’s going to happen with states like Iowa, Nevada, Washington, and Maine, who don’t report popular vote – only delegates? How are those going to tally in? They report only in delegates because that’s how the primary is decided. They never thought they’d need to report any other way because they didn’t expect a candidate to constantly move the goal posts.
BTW, Obama won three of those four states.

Posted by: Heidi, Houston | April 6, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

How can anyone stomach this vile, disingenuous, conniving, back-handed BS? Obama wasn’t even on the ballot in MI for eff sake! Go ahead and count FL, you dumpy windbag, Obama will still win. Any Clinton supporter that hears words like this and sees Hillary Clinton dumping on free democracy and stands by her, doesn’t deserve the vote they have. Re-votes perhaps would have been fair. BTW, Obama supporters didn’t block re-votes, they raised legitimate questions about their constitutionality, something Hillary ain’t so big on.

Posted by: FedUp | April 6, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Please, the Dems put their eggs in a FL basket already and we got Bushed. We certainly are not going to be dependent on that state again to win the GE. If you want to vote for McCain, go ahead and do it. The Supreme Court will be lost, the war will continue, and our economy will get worse.

Posted by: Hope2008 | April 6, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Good Lord. Do we want a president that can’t tell the difference between Michigan and Zimbawe? Haven’t we suffered enough.

Posted by: rtm | April 6, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

When someone doesn’t tell the truth. They tell a lie. Those who tell lies are called liars. How many lies must someone tell before they can be called a liar without disdain from supporters.
The Clintons are continually being caught in “misspeaks” or “mistakes” and with regard to Florida, Michigan, & pledged delegates they display a willingness to cheat to win the White house. Frankly, I am only surprised at the number of people who are willing to ignore & dismiss their blatant shock & awe campaign of fractured facts(lies) & dirty politics.
We’ve already had 8 years of Republican lies & dirty politics. A dishonest triangulating democrat is still a liar no matter how you choose to spell it.

Posted by: Bob Wickline | April 6, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Edwards and Obama were not on the ballot in Michigan and she only got 55.23% of the vote. 40.07% of the Democrats who voted in Michigan got into their cars in the dead of winter, drove to their polling places, and went to pull the lever for “Uncommitted” in an election that they knew would not count, just to express their distaste for Hillary. The fact that she didn’t drop out of the race on the basis of those facts boggles the mind.

Posted by: Bob Scofield | April 6, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

I FEEL FOR SURE THAT IF THE ONLY CHOICE WE HAVE IS OBAMA THEN YOU WILL SEE 100 OF THOUSANDS OF DEMOCRATS VOTING FOR MCCAIN,, THERE IS ALOT THAT WILL SAY DIFFERENT BUT THOSE ARE THE VERY ONES THAT WHEN THEY GET INTO THAT BOOTH WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN,,, THERE IS NO WAY AMERICA WILL SURVIVE OBAMA

Posted by: rick | April 6, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I love this! Clinton v. Obama – It is so fun to watch the dems eat their own young. hahaha

Posted by: matt | April 6, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Team Hill & Bill are playing 2 sides of the fence:
People’s Vote Must Count!
Superdelegates… we need YOU to override the people’s vote!

Posted by: origood | April 7, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

“Obama has convinced the DNC that we have 48 states—not 50!”
that was great!
Obama is a liar, just that simple. He talks about change in one breath while behind the scenes will not support a re-vote, offering jobs to super deligates, says he would of left his church, etc lies lies lies.
If these two states of “voters” votes are not counted (not seating people illegally) it won’t matter, because if Obama wins the nominee due to this he’s lost half the votes of democrats which will go elsewhere. If this is the case I hope a 3rd party decides to run I can believe in.

Posted by: Discouraged | April 7, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Obama is the biggest farce to hit the big stage in a long long time.
We need a President we can count on, not an empty suit cult leader full of shallow promises and deception.
wake up people, this is not American Idol, this is the President of our country and leader of the free world.

Posted by: rallph | April 7, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Hillary is Lying again Any surprise? NAH
If she opens her mouth she lies.

Posted by: Lauren | April 7, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

For a while now, Sen. Hillary Clinton has been saying that the winner of the popular vote should matter.
It only matters if shes ahead.
The Carter Family is for Obama. He is picking up when she is not. You know why? Cuz she is a liar.
Nobody wants a big LIar as President.

Posted by: Lauren | April 7, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

This is the vote for the Iraq war all over again. First she agrees to the rules then because it suits her, she changes her mind. Oh lets bomb Iran….Oh I didn’t read the intel properly. At 3am she should stay asleep!

Posted by: Margaret | April 8, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Count the votes, agree on a fair apportionment, seat the delegates and move on. Let’s show the world that we have a functioning and fair democracy that deserves to be emulated. Stopping disenfranchising voters would be real “change.”

Posted by: Michael Rose | April 15, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

If our votes don’t count now then why should we vote as Dems. in the general election. I say count all votes in Mich. and Fla. Who is dean anyway to even have a say on what happens. He imploded years ago.

Posted by: Mickie | April 24, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.