Apr 27, 2008 2:24pm

At Home in Midwest, Obama Explains Why He Refused Debate Challenge

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller reports: Sen. Barack Obama spent his Sunday attending St. Luke’s United Methodist Church and afterwards dropping by a local restaurant called the "Country Kitchen" for wings and corn bread in Indianapolis, Ind.

The presidential hopeful answered a few questions before entering the predominately African American eatery — and explained why he won’t agree to rival Sen. Hillary Clinton’s weekend challenge for a one-on-one, Lincoln-Douglas-style debate without a moderator.

"We’ve got nine days to try to campaign and meet as many voters as possible," he said. "So rather than being in a studio, I want to make sure that we’re reaching out to folks where they live, answering their questions and having as many interactions as possible."

Obama said he would be more than happy to consider additional debates after Indiana and North Carolina’s May 6 primaries.

Obama said winning Indiana is simply achieving 50 percent of the vote plus one percent more.

"There’s no doubt that Indiana is a state where it’s close," he said. "It’s tied statistically in the polls."

The Illinois Democrat tried to show he’s connected to voters in Hoosier state, saying that the people of Indiana have Midwestern values like citizens of Illinois do.

Obama would not answer questions on how damaging it would be if he loses Indiana, or — on a day when his comments aired on what he heard the Rev. Jeremiah Wright say in sermons — whether Wright’s recent media appearance has been damaging.

On both questions, he told reporters, "I’ll let you guys prognosticate."

User Comments

I am sure people in Indiana do not want to be linked to hateful sermons of Obama’s pastor by voting for him.
Indiana – Vote using your brain !!!
No to Obama

Posted by: Rick | April 27, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

What else were they going to vote with? Or are you saying that if they don’t vote for ‘your’ candidate that they are not using their brain?

Posted by: MIguy | April 27, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

I’ll say it right up front, I’m a Hillary supporter. I don’t have anything against Obama. I don’t buy in to the Wright
criticisms, don’t accept the patriotism nonsense and I can see how he could’ve made a misjudgement about Rezco. My problem is simply that I don’t think he deserves the job, he doesn’t have the experience. He’s not even what I would call a seasoned senator. He sprang on to the scene and has turned what should have been an easy democratic victory into chaos. But, if he gets the nomination, I will support him because he is NOT republican. There is no way that I would ever help a republican into the white house again in my life. I am convinced that they want to destroy my country and for at least 14 years have been striving to do just that. No matter the hard feelings that result from the next few months, we must ban together to defeat McCain. Please don’t allow disappointment to cloud your mind and let the republicans win again.

Posted by: JR | April 27, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Q: What keeps an empty suit standing upright?
A: A lot of hot air.

Posted by: S | April 27, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Sure the country needs change but not in the direction of Obamby.

Posted by: dem | April 27, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Lets take a Junior senator with
no foreign policy experience, with
racist and terrorsist ties and a
dishonest elitist demeanor and make
him president.
What could possibly go wrong??

Posted by: perry | April 27, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Dem, be wise don’t allow sentiments to becloud your sense of reasoning.

Posted by: KC, NY | April 27, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

I used to be a HC suporter,but the more I listen to her lies and false info. And the more I listen to Obama I am now convinced that I WILL vote for Obama, he is a man with dignity,I am 77 and think I have a lot of commen sence, yes Obama we can, leave the negative to HC.
Obama 08

Posted by: The Dane | April 27, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Obama is showing to everyone he is not ready to be president. He is just like every other politician even though he claims to be an agent of Change. He makes statements, realizes he shouldn’t have said them and then lies and back tracks to get out of them. He claims to be different but he is NOT. He is the same old same old. So, we need to go with the person who has the most experience and can get the job done, Hillary Clinton. Indiana, please vote liek your neighbors Pennsylvania and Ohio and New York and New Jersey.

Posted by: Keith | April 27, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

To my last opinion, my familly questien my commen sence, but they all wote Obama
And I am a proud US citicen, God bless our wonderful country, we need Obama to
get back on the right track.
Obama 08

Posted by: The Dane | April 27, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Obama is showing to everyone he is not ready to be president. He is just like every other politician even though he claims to be an agent of Change. He makes statements, realizes he shouldn’t have said them and then lies and back tracks to get out of them. He claims to be different but he is NOT. He is the same old same old. So, we need to go with the person who has the most experience and can get the job done, Hillary Clinton. Indiana, please vote like your neighbors Pennsylvania and Ohio and New York and New Jersey.

Posted by: brick | April 27, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Obama has told too may lies — Wright, Ayers, Rezko, Farrakhan, his wife’s comments, among many others.
Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City terrorist, was a former marine, and considered himself a true patriot. Sometimes individuals think they are “Wright”, when in fact they are WRONG!
If the Press had been more responsible and exposed Obama earlier he would NEVER have won as many states as he did.
OBAMA HAS REFUSED TO DEBATE IN INDIANA AND NORTH CAROLINA. He apparently can only read a pretty scripted speech from a teleprompter — And he wants to run our country??? NO WAY!
Why wasn’t Obama vetted a year ago by the media and the DNC? His entire campaign has been run on lies!
Does Obama plan to have Jeremiah Wright spewing “God Damn America” from the White House? Are Obama’s frequent visitors going to be their anti-American, terrorist friends: bomber Ayers, Farrakhan, Rezko, among others?
VOTE HILLARY 2008!

Posted by: indiana | April 27, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Hillary benefited from the last joke of a debate. Obama would be crazy to let a campaign that is broke get millions of dollars of free TV time. Let the Clinton’s pay to get their message out.

Posted by: aaron | April 27, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

To Perry: The answer to your question,
What could possibly go wrong??
is George W. Bush. To all you young people who think Obama is “change” and “hope” and “unity” that is exactly the same BS that George W. Bush was running on and look what happened. No experience = the vultures surrounding Obama will be the men with the true power.
TELL THE DNC TO ALLOW ALL 50 STATES VOTES TO COUNT!
SAY NO TO THE DNC CORONATION OF OBAMA!

Posted by: calli | April 27, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Obama is showing to everyone he is not ready to be president. He is just like every other politician even though he claims to be an agent of Change. He makes statements, realizes he shouldn’t have said them and then lies and back tracks to get out of them. He claims to be different but he is NOT. He is the same old same old. So, we need to go with the person who has the most experience and can get the job done, Hillary Clinton. Indiana, please vote liek your neighbors Pennsylvania and Ohio and New York and New Jersey.

Posted by: Keith | April 27, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Debates do little to expose a candidates substance. Just a bunch of “gotcha” statements and one-liners for the pundits. It’s all that’s left for Clinton who can’t get voters to connect with her on the issues.
Obama’s open forums here in Oregon a few weeks back were great for the amount of content and detail that came out about the candidate through questioning by local citizens.
Oregon Obama ’08 & ’12.

Posted by: TheNumantine | April 27, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Give Obama the nomination already. These Hillary bloggers need to go away.

Posted by: Ben Straub | April 27, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

21 debates and you people think one more is going to matter right now?
BTW for those of you that like to use cherry picked past associations and issues to define and support the hate you feel when you look at Obama. Keep in mind that this country hypocritically continued the institution of slavery for nearly 100 years after declaring that all men are created equal. That there was a systematic effort by this nation to either kill the native population or destroy its heritage and culture in an effort to wipe them from history. A history of politicians corrupted by the lust for power and wealth at the cost of the people. This continues on today, years after a hurricane so little done in New Orleans as to be laughable that we are the wealthiest and most powerful nation on earth. There has been further progress made on infrastructure in Iraq.
this government HAS intentionally infected minorities with disease on more than one occasion, suspended the bill of rights when it suited it to persecute and justify in the name of national security bigotry and prejudice. Our government has lied to us repeatedly, not just in the last 7 years but throughout most of our history. We have dictated to nations across the globe, do as we say or we will annihilate you. This government treats its citizens like children to be spoiled and then wonders at how horrible they behave.
Hillary Clinton has told plenty of lies, publicly and privately. She has threatened members of her own party and is clear that should she have sufficient power, retribution is to be hers against all that have ever opposed her. She has many questionable associations, beginning with her husband. She classifies those democrats they do not vote for her as the ‘bad’ democrats, how can you be more elitist? Her families ties with the businesses in the middle east are as deep as those with the Bush family. She has already promised that American soldiers will provide the shield for Saudi Arabia against attack.
If you have to cherry pick information to try and make someone look bad, then it is something more than a disagreement with policy. If you plan to vote for McCain if HRC doesn’t get nominated, it is clear that your issues with Barack Obama have nothing to do with politics.

Posted by: Louis | April 27, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

It’s called being diplomatic and reaching out to people. Something that a President needs to be able to do. Imagine that.
Going on FOX? Where he knew they had lied about him and exploited his relationship with his pastor, but left Hagee and McCain alone, shows that he means what he says when he says he is going to bring people together even if it means walking into the lions den and keeping his cool. The big picture folks, that’s what wins this race. Not the petty sound bites or threatening to obliverate another country.

Posted by: Brian | April 27, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

i think all of you hillary supporters making fun of rev wright you have to realize you are making fun of the black church. you are making fun of dr king–who spoke out against the governments war in viet nam–hillary is killing the democratic party!!!!

Posted by: william | April 27, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Hillary Clinton cannot be trusted.
Hillary Clinton is desperate and shrill.
Barack Obama is a UNITER, INCLUSIVE, INSPIRING, PROGRESSIVE, NON-PARTISAN AND THE ONLY CHOICE FOR PRESIDENT.
YES WE CAN!
Barack Obama for President!

Posted by: michelle | April 27, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

I for one see no sense in another debate. HRC is pulling at whatever is out there to try and pull a rabbit win out of the hat. One more debate will NOT change that. America knows where they stand on their issues. It has been debated. At this point, it is about who wants whom to win. Bottom line. I am not necessarily a fan of anyone at this point; I just don’t see that any more debates will open up anything …but a can of worms.

Posted by: JD | April 27, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Dave:
You forget that Obama voted ‘present’ more times in the Illinois state senate than did any other senator in the state’s history. Surely he can’t be all bad???

Posted by: Aston | April 27, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Why are we even talking about Clinton?
She was gone way back on super Tuesday.
I think the press just want to sell
newspapers fooling everybody into thinking
that she still has a chance. Listen you
Hillary supporters, She’s GONE with the
wind. Accept it. She’s not tenacious like
the press paints her, She’s stubborn and
egotistical, and delusional.

Posted by: Frank | April 27, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

To KCNY: The DNC rules, applied to only stripping MI and FL of pledged delegates. The “rules” do not apply to the popular vote – which still counts according to the “rules”. If the DNC were to follow the “rules” then Iowa, NH and SC should be stripped of their pledged delegates as well, since they moved up their primaries in violation of the “rules” and did not receive proper DNC authorization to move their dates ahead. (I predict lawyers are racking up some major fees with this one.) If you count the popular vote for all the states, Hillary is ahead. Obama should be a man and allow a revote in both states, otherwise, get ready for a really big “rules” fight, because it seems like one is coming.
SAY NO TO THE DNC CORONATION OF OBAMA!
TELL THE DNC TO ALLOW ALL 50 STATES VOTES TO COUNT!

Posted by: calli | April 27, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Obama is ducking another debate because he can’t measure up to Hillary Clinton. Indiana voters, please vote as your neighbors Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York and New Jersey did. Let’s show the Super Delegates that we the people want Hillary Clinton as our next President. The tide is turning!!!

Posted by: Keith | April 27, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

For all the democrats who have enjoyed “railing” on the republicans….welcome to your own world. We will be your own party’s undoing at this rate. I suggest waking up and smelling the writing on the wall..and get it together.

Posted by: TTLS | April 27, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Senator Obama has told too many lies? Just what has he lied about? Nothing, nada. Now let’s take Hillary, Bosnia, sniper fire, I helped negotiate the Northern Ireland Peace Accord, I did the CHIP program, I did the Family Leave Act. CHIP program – Orren Hatch & Ted Kennedy, Family Leave Act – Joe Biden, Ireland Peace Accord – George Mitchell, Bosnia & snipers – lied. All lies. If Bosnia was so dangerous, why did you take your only child there and march her off of the plane with you? Why?

Posted by: Carolyn Grace | April 27, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Obama steal the nomination? LOL!! He is ahead in popular vote,states won, and superdelagates. I think you need to go back to school and learn adding and subtracting again.

Posted by: ron | April 27, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Another tought for those complaining about another debate. Don’t watch! But there are thousands and thousands who have not kept up on the campaign from day to day and need answers and information to make a choice. These undecideds are hoping to get the right stuff so they can make their choice one week from Tuesday.
Obama says he’d like to meet people on the campaign trail rather than debate. Come now – a televised discussion will reach hundreds of thousands not just a few hundred at a breakfast diner.

Posted by: Dave | April 27, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Sorry ron
More jobs have been created under Bush than in the administration of any other president. Most are good jobs in small and medium sized companies. You can look it up.

Posted by: Aston | April 27, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Aston: The jobs that have been created under the Bush administration are part-time fast food jobs.

Posted by: ron | April 27, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Michelle, Hillary Clinton has gone across the ile many more times than Barack Obama. If anyone is dividing this party, it’s Obama, he came from no where and thinks he can run this country…what a joke!
Hillary ’08 and ’12

Posted by: Jonath | April 27, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Foolswho do not like Hillary Clinton for her personality voted blindlessly for the unknown guy. You may not like Hillary, but a lot of us respect her toughness which is presidential. Obama is a weak scared man. He turned to drugs to avoid facing pressure and now he is hiding in his half-eaten waffle. We cannot have a gutless wimp like Dukaksis on the ballot in November.

Posted by: geevill | April 27, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

ron
No, the Bush jobs are NOT fast food jobs. Where exactly, did you get such an absurd notion. Listening to spin-merchants?

Posted by: Aston | April 27, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Candidates who want to be president should never be AFRAID to debate any body any time any place.

Posted by: politicsIsdirty | April 27, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Mark — Aren’t you over-generalizing just a bit?

Posted by: Aston | April 27, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Howard Roark
It appears that the only way you can say something good about your candidate is to say something bad about his opponent. Why would anybody buy that?

Posted by: Aston | April 27, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

If u put Rev.Wrights words in his intreview in proper perspective wasnt he a bit upset about Obamas suggen loss of loyalty ???when the story of the REV
first came to light Mr. Obama stressed his love and allegience to the pastor saying he is my spiritual advisor and my familys .He is my mentor my friend my uncle I could NEVER DISOWN HIM …PEOPLE MUST UNDERSTAND BLACK CHURCH CAN BE DIFFERENT. NOW A SHORT FEW MONTHS LATTER MR. OBAMA DOES INDEED DISOWN .HIM. DO U THINK THE REV WAS TELLING US SOMETHING ???? HOW LONG BEFORE HE DISOWNS YOU . HE IS POLITICS AS USUAL WORDS NOTHING BEHIND THEM NO LOYALTY . 20 YEARS OF TRUST REV DISOWENED FOR OBAMAS PERSONEL AGENDAS I WOULD BE UPSET TOO

Posted by: AMERICAN | April 27, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

I think Obama’s refusal to debate, without moderators, shows very clearly that he is unfit for the job of President. You can’t duck anytime you feel inadequate to the issues when you’re in the White House. Obama knows when next to HRC he’s outclassed. He’s got no courage of his own.

Posted by: Wendy4Decency | April 27, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Florida and Michigan are perfect examples of where Hillary has NO INTEGRITY.

Posted by: Howard Roark | April 27, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

It’s funny how the only people who don’t want a debate are Obama supporters.
He’s too frightened and wimpy to debate Hillary because he knows he will get his butt handed to him again.

Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Why should he debate Hillary again? Why would he? She has nothing to lose (because she has already lost the nomination and her integrity). Thats like getting into a cage fight with a suicide bomber – not smart.

Posted by: Howard Roark | April 27, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Howard Roark
Most people would thing the Trinity Baptist Church is a place of NO INTEGRITY.

Posted by: Aston | April 27, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

I can tell you all the truth.
Obama claims he wants a new politics.
We can plainly see his idea of new politics is WORSE than the old politics.
Its even more bitter, based on rhetoric. He has a huge surrogate army going around behind the scenes to bribe the media.
He has a chip on his shoulder -but at least it aint as bad as his wifes.
If this is the NEW politics, then we want the OLD politics back.

Posted by: tomdavie | April 27, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

James, I completely agree. They’re also the ones who are calling for Hillary to drop out. They don’t want Florida and Michigan to count, even if they dont Obama doesnt have a pray in winning in Nov. Obama supporters have such a sense of entitlement to the presidency, they think he was annointed candidate. Pretty sad really. At least Clinton supporters look past his senseless rhetoric and nonsense.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: Jonath | April 27, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Hillary has tried desperately to frame presidential qualifications down to meanness, the company you keep and whether you wear a flag pin. She can play games with math all she wants, viciously attck her colleague with one breath and then cry about being the victim with the next whilst Bill is threatening and bribing every superdelegate he can but this all stops very soon. She is almost down for the count and two of our national political nightmares will soon be history: The Presidency of George Bush and the Hillary Clinton Primary of 2008.

Posted by: Howard Roark | April 27, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Please vote the Clintons for a third term. They deserve it. It is their birth right. The Clintons and the Bushes forever. We do not deserve better. Only the Clintons and Bushes can rule us.
Hillary, the lady that came to New York to run for the senate, in order to position herself for a run for the Presidency.
Yeah, She’s in it to win it. Give it to her. It is her right.

Posted by: Sandy | April 27, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Dave you are absolutely right!! Why would Obama turn down the opportunity to reach thousands of undecided voters by refusing another debate?? Does Obama think that we won’t need these voters to beat McCain in the general election??By not debating HRC now, many voters will think that Obama is either hiding something else or has no confidence in his own debating skills!! WAKE UP OBAMA AND ALEXROD!! THIS IS YOUR CHANCE TO CLINCH THE NOMINATION – DEBATE NOW OR RISK EVERYTHING FOR OUR PARTY IN THE GENERAL ELECTION!!! NO WIMPS IN THE WHITE HOUSE! SUPERDELEGATES TAKE NOTE!!

Posted by: fairsuperdelegates08 | April 27, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Just my oppinion of course but I think this country should be happy that Obama is even runing. With all the people trying to throw dirt at this guy if I were him I’d say go ahead and staighten this mess out your self I don’t think he really “needs” to be president like H.Clinton “needs” to be. I think this country really needs Obama—not the democrats or the republicans or the independents but the country. It is time, and maybe past time to have a smart person that isn’t feeding their rich friends and their agenda trying to feed our starving country. But then of course does it really matter?

Posted by: Dan | April 27, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

I’ll tell you why they should debate again, Antion- because we as Americans deserve to know exactly where both candidates stand on every single issue. Knowing our candidates is important, MAN, in case you forgot.

Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Antoin, it truly doesn’t matter to me if they debate or not. I simply inferred from the article that perhaps everything that could be debated had been. At this point, it would appear that it’s only going to snipping at one another. Perhaps he wants to stay above the fray? Who knows? I honestly can’t decide if it would hurt or help at this point.

Posted by: JD | April 27, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

My two cents, you may be right…err wright….err…rite. I honestly don’t know anymore which one is err…..right.

Posted by: JD | April 27, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Why hasn’t Hillary dropped out of the race? Surely she knows she’s already lost. The answer is that she is following Democratic Party strategy. Obama could have ended this on Super Tuesday. However, in each state that they go into fighting, the number of voters registering as and changing their registration to Democrat soars. It give the party a valuable opportunity to get into what were once Republican strongholds and get the local party organized and motivated. The strategy is working. The Democrats are building a base for the fall that the GOP will not be able to surrount in any but the most staunch red states. None of the larger state will be red after November.

Posted by: Democratic Stategy | April 27, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Dirt Dirt Dirt
Shame on you Hillary…
The abc debate, she attacked attacked and attacked
Bill Ayers???
Should we mention the Black Panthers Hillary???
or
The Board of the New World Foundation???
whom funded the Palestine Liberation Organization, at a time when the PLO was officially recognized by the US government as a terrorist organization
Should we mention your participation in funding a terrorist group
or
Should we mention Peter Paul, the fraud???
Whom donated $2,000,000 for your senate race
The trial that begun Friday
or
Should we mention the “mystery” deaths of dozens whom were to testify against your husband and youself???
or
Maybe we should mention the women…dated back from arkansas whom Bill had affairs and some rape???
or
Perhaps Norman Hsu, the fraud whom donated $850,000 to Sen. Clintons senate race???
WAIT TILL THE REPUBLICANS ARE DONE WITH HER
You think Obama is worse???
Think again.
You think Sean Hannity is backing Hillary for the Dems race b/c he’s changed his party affiliation to liberal???
NO
Sean Hannity knows and believe it, if Hillary is the nominee, she will be EXPOSED

Posted by: Vanessa | April 27, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Vanessa, that’s precisely the difference: Hillary has already been exposed. Obama has not. We knot Hillary’s popularity bottom. We are only getting to know Obama’s.

Posted by: P. | April 27, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Vanessa, what else can HRC be exposed for? I do not mean this in a snide way, merely curious. Seems that pretty much most of their dirty laundry has been hung out long ago.

Posted by: JD | April 27, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

BO and his supporters keep insult voters who do not vote for him by calling them dumb, stupid, bitter, … If you want to have a chance to win in November, you had better ask yourselves some hard questions why on earth you cannot win their support, after spending an unbelievable a mount of money advertizing yourself. Could it be because there is something wrong in your message, in your approach, in your arrogant atitude looking down on people, in your self-claimed “more educated” or smart selves?
BO is not going to win back these voters in November, with on one hand his arrogance, and on the other his evasive, wimpy approach (even afraid of a debate).

Posted by: lazy | April 27, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Hillary is too shady. Obama is just an empty suit that talks good, and McCain is older than dirt and wants to kick enemy ass. What kind of choices do we really have? Help.

Posted by: Robert Pierre | April 27, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Robert Pierre
You have Nader.

Posted by: Aston | April 27, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

I am waiting for an explanation from Obama-fans for the following:
1) Obama campaign’s lack of drive to sit the Michigan and Florida delegations, or hold new contests.
2) Obama’s refusal to debate with Hillary again before Indiana and NC.

Posted by: P. | April 27, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Bo is being quite a bit too cavalier… all he needs is a felt hat with a feather in it! Hillary is in the process of smacking him down by out hustling him… he thinks he has it and hes about to be relegated to the veeo role with good reason … Dean isnt very smart… Fl and Mi will count eventually which means Clinton is ahead in the popular vote… dont go away mad Obama supporters just GO AWAY!

Posted by: Staniam | April 27, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I will be voting for who ever wins this contest being it Clinton or Obama. I am a democrat and believe in both of their ideas and plans for the future. Is anyone with me or is everyone in here a bunch of ignorant closedminded jerks.
From everyone talking around here, sounds likes its going to be
BUSH 2008!!!

Posted by: LogicalThinker | April 27, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

He is so unelectable if he thinks he will win the blue collar vote, women’s vote and the elderly he wrong.
We are not dumb we know who the better
candidate is and its not Obama.

Posted by: Melissa | April 27, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Wait, let me get this right. A win for him is one percent, but when hillary gets a nine point lead, it is not a victory? Did anyone catch that hypocracy there?

Posted by: Darryl | April 27, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

I happen to be one of those democrats that has to make a decision to possibly vote for Obama or cross the line and vote for McCain. Mr. Obama needs to stop hiding behind the door. If he wants to instill confidence in people who have seen a lot of dirty laundry, he needs to fearlessly come out in the sunshine. While hope and change sounds good, it’s just words. What really counts here is integrity and strength of character. I haven’t seen that yet. I see a lot of spin and ring around the rosey. Maybe, since he’s ahead he thinks he can hide in the shadows, call everything a distraction and win the day. I don’t think so. Middle of the road democrates like myself, want some proof of the pudding. And, please people stop with ignorant and attacking comments and just grow up. None of the candidates are monsters. They are just politicans trying to win an election. Get over yourselves!

Posted by: James France | April 27, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Yes, He needs some times to think what the public would ask him because every state he promises something different.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 27, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

If Hillary would stop her incessant screeching for just a minute – she might notice that the fat lady – she’s a singing!!!

Posted by: Howard Roark | April 27, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

unlike Hillary who refused to debate her opponent, Barack has debated Hillary 21 times.. It is not time for each candidate to take their case to the electorate directly. No more debates.
With Hillary surrogates Gibson, and Stephanopolos parading themselves as fair minded, objective moderators, we definitely do not need more debates. We have had enough of the media, spinsters, the pundits, the spin rooms – let the voters speak.. This race has go on for so long.. Let it run it’s course..No more debates

Posted by: Sue | April 27, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

He just told Chris wallace this morning he will raise capital tax into 20% and Chis wallace cut him with saying: 28%.
Please don’t fool people.
You think people don’t remember what you said on the debate. It is still fresh in everybody’s mind.
That’s what you call it ” CHANGE”
We need ” Change” ALL THE TIMES.
Or you just want to COPY Hillary’s plan.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 27, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Yes, we concede that Hillary won PA by 9.4% after telling voters that Obama hates them. But she did not make much dent on his lead, which will increase after IN and NC.

Posted by: Gillis | April 27, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

unlike Hillary who refused to debate her opponent, Barack has debated Hillary 21 times.. It is now time for each candidate to take their case to the electorate directly. No more debates.
With Hillary surrogates Gibson, and Stephanopolos parading themselves as fair minded, objective moderators, we definitely do not need more debates. We have had enough of the media, spinsters, the pundits, the spin rooms – let the voters speak.. This race has go on for so long.. Let it run it’s course..No more debates

Posted by: Sue | April 27, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

It is clear Hillary plays old politics of clever statements, twisting of facts and even making up some new ones.
It may work for us in Nov. But I believe Obama’s method of focusing on facts and and countering the Republicans immediately will be more effective.

Posted by: Gillis | April 27, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Excellent point John. Your post gives food for thought and I would imagine a very poor replication of a debate would be the ensuing product. Nicely put.

Posted by: MK | April 27, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Hillary and bill are looking desperate these days. He has displayed some of the most unbecoming behavior I’ve ever seen of a former President.
Obama could have taken the low road as Hillary did in many of the debates but chose not to. He could have called her on her ties to Norman Hsu, he could have he could have embarrassed her on Bosnia two debates ago but had too much class to do so. Hillary is down in the gutter with Carville, Begala, Wolfson and the rest of the Arkansas swamp dwellers. Hillary is just looking to make headlines with this debate nonsense. If Pennsylvania’s favoarite daughter were so confident about Indiana, she’d just get on with the campaigning. After all, she blew a 20 point lead in PA and the only reason she came within 10 is because she gave out street money which Obama did not.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

The democrats are in serious meltdown because of power mad candidates. Just like the unions are run by crooks, so is the dem party. You guys are all idiots.

Posted by: Robert Pierre | April 27, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

au contriare to use one of you Obama elitist phrases! The so called “21 debates” have not all been 1-on-1 There were about 14 or so with the other candidates and thats not the same… they didnt have time to get to Obamas malapropisms and shady past etc which is fair game… he is the inferior candidate if you Obama people cannot handle that and furthermore that Hillary will be made the nominee in the convention please leave the country now!

Posted by: Staniam | April 27, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

James is not really interested in the issues. He just wants to see Obama stumble.

Posted by: Gillis | April 27, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

seriously we need to stop this disastrous path before it gets too late.. Omaba and his staff are playing like Hillary is the pretender… she has a proven record of gettign things done no matter the question of tact… thats just politics and it works… Obama should debate or just get out and go away!

Posted by: Staniam | April 27, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Rubbie,
Why don’t you make a list of how many people died of crimes in Illinois since Obama became Senator .
You know Illinois is one of highest crime state in the country.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 27, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

WHAT IS NOT FAIR ABOUT ANOTHER DEBATE?? WHY DOESN’T EVERYONE NEED TO SEE BOTH OF THESE CANDIDATES GET GRILLED AGAIN TO SEE WHO IS THE BEST TO STAND UP TO MCCAIN?? I AM AN UNDECIDED VOTER WHO THINKS THAT ALL OF THIS MSM LOVEFEST WITH OBAMA IS BS. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SEE HRC IN THE HOT SEAT ABOUT SOME MAJOR ISSUES TOO – CAN YOU SAY COLUMBIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT $$$. We need this debate so that everyone can make a final decision and MOVE FORWARD!! ARE YOU LISTENING DNC LEADERSHIP (THAT MEANS YOU HOWARD)!! SUPERDELEGATES TAKE NOTE THAT OBAMA APPEARS TO BE WIMPING OUT BEFORE OUR VERY EYES!!

Posted by: fairsuperdelegates08 | April 27, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

To: crisis08
Yes it does. It’s right up there with DC and Philly.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Bill O’Reily looked into the Larry Sinclair story and found it was not creditable.
I’m sure if it were Sean Hannity would be all over it
Sinclair address is stated to be in a mental institute.
There’s no checking in by Obama or Sinclair in the hotel he stated
He failed the lie detector test
and fourth, it’s been said this rumor began by a Ron Paul supporter

Posted by: Vanessa | April 27, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

So is Clinton
Peter Paul Fundraising scandal. McCain for President. Dumb democrats

Posted by: Sue | April 27, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

no doubt it was Obamas connections that got the M-4 rifles on the streets of Chi town this week.. since Durbin is more impotent than good!Obama must debate because all of this stuff cannot come out after he is the nominee

Posted by: Staniam | April 27, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

To George Stepupanvotehilos:
Everybody talks about Obama’s 20 years in the church. It was in his early years there that he did most of his work for the poor in the southside. The controversial Wright comments actually weren’t made until 6 years ago

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

To “jbate”
Hey I like your list also don’t forget to mention how Hilary’s campaign call themselves democratic but after they won PENN Her campaign seniors where thanking FOX NEWS for being the 1st to announce their victory when FOX NEWS doesn’t like them either
WHAT true phonys

Posted by: Apollo Creed | April 27, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Only in the Democratic party, would someone like Hillary Clinton be a frontrunner.
Google “Clinton convicts” and see the rap sheet of the Clintons.. From stealing plates in the White House to outright misappropriation of public funds, to pardoning convicted terrorists and felons for cash

Posted by: Jamie | April 27, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Why are you people debating about who should be the nominee while the people from two states are not included? The super delegates are going to decide without any concerns about how the people feel. This party has told you that they don’t care about YOUR opinion and you seem to be fine with it. Just remember you get what you pay for in the end and your vote should at least count for something.

Posted by: boulderhippie2 | April 27, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

the Wright story is not going away…. nobody sits in a church and listens to stuff liek that whether it was 20 or 6 yrs ago and Obama was not CHristian till he got to know Wright and he made connections with him on the direction of the person directing him in the community organizing thing… just all things scurilous to a fault…..

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

No Lake, I wouldn’t want to encourage any of my family to be interns in the WH under BC; bu then again, no one in my family is
“smart” enough to go to the WH…and for that I am most thankful! We’re all just a bunch a plastic dolls!

Posted by: BarbiesADoll | April 27, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Indiana
Vote your Brain and with your better side.
Not your fear, not your habit and not by listening to people who are scared of change who have stuck us in this mess for years of partisan angry “fighting” politics.
Change is hard but solutions without change…leaves us where we are.
Vote for the 21st century candidate.
Obama.

Posted by: dl | April 27, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I do find it amazing that the dems were SO concerned about the disenfranchised folks in Florida back in 01….what happened? They aren’t disenfranchised now that it’s between two dems? Gimme a break

Posted by: GoodOleAbe | April 27, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Hey, so what if he doesn’t want to debate? What’s so bad about that? Maybe the guy is saving up for later on to wham bam and say it’s over mam sort of debate? I mean, it’s not like we haven’t heard all their crap before. Geeze. Enough is enough.

Posted by: ISeeDeadPeople | April 27, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Hillary was in NC Thursdeay night to a crowd of over 10000 in a small downtown area.. we all arent tobacco chewers in NC and Hillary was gracefull and looked the part of commander-In_Cheif with 9 former Mililary officers includign Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs Henry Shelton whom Bush kicked out for not endorsing his war plan…the clintons past cannton come close to the checkered past of the Obamas… thats not meant to be racist but so be it!

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Obama doesn’t want to debate because he doesn’t think well on his feet. Which doesn’t bode well for an emergency phone call at any time of the day. He has to discuss everything over with his experts to know what his position is on anything. How is he going to handle visiting dignitaries that he has to have one on one conversations with? A President has to be able to discuss our policies at any time without coaching.

Posted by: jkr | April 27, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

jkr: He thinks just fine on his feet. I believe it was Hillary who failed the bar.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

If anything needs to be investigated, it’s the slush fund called the Clinton Library.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

THere were 20,000 requests for a ticket to a clinton-Obama debate to be held in raleigh this week but they are scared to do it….just because Bush was a screw up and got elected anyway doeshnt give Obama the right to follow that model!!!! its 2000 all over again.

Posted by: Staniam | April 27, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Vote EXPERIENCE.. we need someone who can get things done..who knows how to play the game. This GUY promises the moon and stars..he can’t deliver. How about that stand he took against toys from China.. he went back on that as soon as the corporates cried! He roll over on everything esle too, he isn’t a fighter–he just talks big game..don’t believe it!

Posted by: Lisa Las Vegas | April 27, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Why doesn’t anyone think that a debate is MANDATORY for both candidates???!!! We need to finish this primary as FAIR as possible for our party so that we can win it in November!! Why is it the SAME OLD POLITICS AS USUAL OBAMA??!! Come out of the shadows and debate HRC now!! The undecided voters need to see BOTH candidates as many times as possible BEFORE the convention so that we can get a FAIR assessment of ELECTABILITY!! SUPERDELEGATES TAKE NOTE!!

Posted by: fairsuperdelegates08 | April 27, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

@ Dee,
Don’t you know that Obama is the one copy Hillary’s plans?
Now…he even changed his capital tax plan to 20%.
I don’t trust him. He can change everything he said every time he needs to.
Once he becomes the president he can change everything he had promised to people.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 27, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Obama actually agreed to that North Carolina debate. It was Hillary who declined. Look it up.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Blackman – how can you call an evaluation of the candidates in an UNSCRIPTED DEBATE setting “SILLY”??? The democratic party needs to win BIG in November no matter WHO is the candidate? Wouldn’t you agree??

Posted by: fairsuperdelegates08 | April 27, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

What would Obama have to gain in another debate? He has no reason to debate since he pretty much has the nomination. The best outcome for him is to win which he already has. This is another pathetic attempt by Hillary to discredit Obama. She needs to go away and let the real politicians play.

Posted by: boulderhippie2 | April 27, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

I’ll take the candidate endorsed by statesmen Sam Nunn and Lee Hamilton any day.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Indiana appears to be favored to Obama. It will be an open primary so Independents and Repubs can vote, plus it has high black and urban populations and has a younger more educated population than PA. All suited to Obama.

Posted by: Bob, DC | April 27, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Remember how he used to trash Edwards
in those “debates”… John Edwards
will endorse Hillary in the end and
that will wrap this thing up…

Posted by: irene | April 27, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

The only reason Hillary got her senate seat is because she was married to the President. The only reason she’s now running for President is because she was married to the President. The woman didn’t even pass the DC Bar for heaven’s sake. She is an insult to accomplished woman across this country who achieved great things on their own.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Creed
It did make sense and you know Im right get ready to be taken out of the campaign

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

good point Bob: That’s why Obama
needs to win that state…

Posted by: yes | April 27, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

How about this idea. Instead of a new debate, let’s air the greatest bloopers from previous debates! Or how about Candidates Gone Wild! Or if you really want to draw the ratings, invite aspiring comedians to do crazy routines about the aspiring presidental candidates and let the viewers call in to vote the winner. Who knows, this last idea might become a series that runs until November when they announce the winner. If it goes over well, maybe we could just eliminate the electoral college system of voting.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | April 27, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

If any of you attend church today — that is the house that Jesus built, you pray for all these demonics s-p-i-r-i-t-s! It don’t a loud mouth to profess their abilities to bring changes to America.

Posted by: nadine | April 27, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

she may not have passed the DC bar but she passed the arkansas bar obviously because she was a partner in a prestigious law firm there if I remember correctly… its litterally all bs that you obama people are spoutign and it smells as such

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Bob and yes: you both make good points. Obama cut her 20 point lead in PA down to 10 and he did it without the Independnet vote and without giving street money in Philly.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

I don’t always agree with Hillary but
her speeches generally have some
substance, realism and historical context.

Posted by: helen | April 27, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Obama is the one that is bitter remember nobody in true workign class america wants you volvo/Bmw driving ultra liberals to be dictating this campaign anymore because it lost the last two elections! Edwards will endorese Hillary then it will be over for Obamabecause he knows the debates will finish him off!

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

I am sick of debates. They don’t reflect a candidates capabilities as POTUS. Debates are more a test of which candidate ability to be deceptive and lie more effectively — which favors Hilary.

Posted by: Bob, DC | April 27, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Down and out, and underprivileged people
definitely deserve there right to HOPE
and I wouldn’t take that right away from them… still to HOPE and vote smart
is even better….
Go Hillary 08

Posted by: jerry | April 27, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Ah yes. The presigious Arkansas law firm. Would that be the firm with the missing billing records that mysteriously turned up in the White House?

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

I think Hillary suggesting a Lincoln-Douglas style debate shows her leadership in changing the way politics is done. This primary election has broken the past with the number of debates so that voters don’t just see political ads. I think it shows Obama says one thing – he wants to change politics but does another – not willing to debate. Hillary has the experience to lead a nation, the creativity to proposal new solutions to issues and the leadership to drive implementation of breakthrough ideas!

Posted by: C in Washington State | April 27, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

thats right Helen realism,substance,and historical context is what we need.. even W reads history now and then and gets it right for the most part as far as context…. to be an Obama supporter is not to look at that kinda stuff and have false hope and believe change ca come from innate force of optimism… thats not true sooo not true!

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

I love Sentaor Clinton, and I am sure her challenge was toungue in cheek. It is a well known fact she is way behind moneywise. Why would obama give her free air time. Don’t blame him at all. On the other hand, it would be an opportunity for him to win a debate rather than get pounded again. I doubt that would happen. So, run obama run. Don’t blame you at all.

Posted by: Beau | April 27, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Dee: and then Hillary took her 3 point lead and made it 9.34….
There is need to worry in both camps IMHO.

Posted by: ralph | April 27, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Hillary sold a bill of goods to PA and they bought it. The working people of PA can get in the 6 year line behind the people of upstate New York and wait for those jobs to roll in. LOL

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Obama doesnt want to debate becausee he thinks he has the backing of people in Congress that dont want certain truths to come out… he thinks he has it and can do all those kindof awkward things that Bush did in 2000 bleive you me they were far mor surprised to be elected in 2000 than Pres Clinton was in 92 win Hillary said that she couldnt believe she was sleeping in the white house… the Clintons are on the right side of history…..

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Why do you think Senator Obama is afraid to have a debate with Senator Clinton? Draw your own conclusion. Is that the President you want to lead the Country? Hmmmm…. I don’t. Maybe he is just afraid to show up his weak points as a candidate for he is not really electable.

Posted by: Sam Lim | April 27, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

staniam – If you think W reads more than Obama, you obviously are way off. I think W has read about 1 book while president. We know because he was so proud of it that he told everyone.
Obama is an intellectual and reads all the time.

Posted by: jock59801 | April 27, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Obama can’t debate because he knows he can’t take a chance at direct questions and be able to answer them. Or get caught in his lies.
He is weak, Incompetent and does not have the ability to lead this country.
His change is Not for all Americans, as he tries to have people believe.
He is a speech, nothing more.

Posted by: seah | April 27, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

I don’t see how somebody who loses
CA, TX, OH, PA and NY among others
can be taken seriously…
Vote Hillary 08!

Posted by: perso | April 27, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Democrats we really need to get past this. im willing to bet that if either one of them get the nom and we win the general election the other one will serve on their cabinet. VP wouldnt make sense but cabinet member would.

Posted by: Allamr18 | April 27, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Blackman- don’t you get that I am on your team??!! If you think I want 4 more years of Republican BS you are SO WRONG!! I am saying that Obama AND CLINTON need to be seen in another debate to put the issue of electability to bed once and for all. Let American voters ask the questions with a moderator present for time intervals only to make it FAIR. LET IT BE FOR “WE THE PEOPLE” that means me and you!!! We have to settle this once and for all so that we can start moving forward for ALL OF US!!!!!! DEBATE, DEBATE, DEBATE for a democratic president in November!!!!!!!

Posted by: fairsuperdelegates08 | April 27, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Bob4USA,
Good post. Thanks.
We will donate more to her campaign.
PS. foreigner newspaper reported Obama made a promise will help Odingo to get elected after he becomes president.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 27, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Actually, it is very clever of Clinton to demand a debate. It would give her more exposure in a venue she does well, and perhaps more importantly it would get Obama off the campaign trail for a few days, which is where HE does best. Her best chance of winning Indiana is to keep him from rallying the voters.

Posted by: jock59801 | April 27, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

The correct and democratic thing is for Americans
to choose 2 out of the 3 with
a national referenndum before the election where eveybody gets 1 vote.
Republicans would have to vote for McCain to keep him alive.

Posted by: correct | April 27, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

um billster she doesnt have the nubers now but she will eventually when the primary season is finished and then the superdelegates will take note if they havent already give up now on Obama… I mean yesterday wouldnt have been too soon… He will not win

Posted by: Staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Obama is becoming a tired candidate and most of his smokescreen s gone…
Vote Hillary 08!

Posted by: don | April 27, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

News Flash! And the blind shall lead the blind, a multitude of them. Hillary, the shepherd leading her flock straight to the pit, the “bottomless pit”. Again, Bush II was the beginning of sorrow for 7 yrs. Pressure cooker Hillary, the inferno is about to go up in flames! Hillary & many of you doing all you can to tear Obama down, but watch God intervene and all of you will be waking up to a nightmare!

Posted by: nadine | April 27, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

As Obama’s negatives continue to
pile up, mix together and grow…

Posted by: welcome | April 27, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

the Obama delegates only have to vote for Obama on the first ballot neither can win in the first ballot so I do believe Obama is toast after that… the quaint Obama people get his “sprit” but they do not know process and practicality… just Hope and CHange aint gonna get it!

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

It’s 6:00 Am and when trying to take the oath of office obama has forgotten his plagerized speech and mutters uh uh uh uh uh.

Posted by: Beau | April 27, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

my goodness! what are you all going to DO when the DNC actually chooses one of them to represent the Democrats in the national election? You better get your acts together now and choose to support the party or we’ll lose in November!

Posted by: joeyfatonefan1 | April 27, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

We’ve had more debates than we need. We certainly do not need another one. hillary and her family need to go home and stop their lies and passive/agressive games.
Obama talks the truth and doesn’t have to resort to lies and threats. He doesn’t need to turn against people he’s known for years just because they support the other candidate unlike hillary.
Obama 2006–from a 50 year old “white” female who’s disgusted that the first “viable” female cadidate for president has to be so unethical and dramatic.
Do we really want someone representing us who shakes her finger at folks saying “Shame on you..?” Do we really want someone representing us when their spouse would be making headlines around the world for having “relations” with someone else? Both clintons have been investigated numerous times and didn’t he lose his license to practice law?
Debbie

Posted by: Debbie | April 27, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

LA Times, April 11
Barack Obama may lose support in Philadelphia over ‘street money’

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

fairsuperdelegates08:
If you are really so dense you don’t know why Obama won’t agree to another debate, the answer is simple: He’s so far ahead he doesn’t need the distraction – Hillary does.

Posted by: jbate | April 27, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

omg… is anyone reading this crap”God will intervene” this is the sabboth that is blasphenous… Obama is not the messiah … he does look like that actor that portays the antichrist in the Discovery thing about the end of the world lol

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Hillary canceled the debate on April 18th because the next day is The Passover begins.
Obama does not care about this because he does not cling to religion.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 27, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

STANIAM—YOU DREAMING BIG TIME.HEY BY THE WAY, THE SKY IS FALLING!

Posted by: READY999 | April 27, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Its not obvious yet, but Hillary Clinton
has a fairly clear path to the WH.
Elections can change suddenly and often
do….

Posted by: gil | April 27, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Reports out there that the Clinton campaign is threatening the SuperDs — if they support Obama over her they are finished with the Clintons politically. This is one of main reasons many of SDs have not declared yet. It also suggests that most of the remaining undeclared are leaning Obama otherwise they would have declared already. BTW, the Obama campaign has made no such similar threats. Not his style.

Posted by: Bob, DC | April 27, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Asheville is a progressive, liberal, well-educated town. I don’t believe those are Hillary’s people.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

MIguy,
I truly respect your comment but I would suggest that some of your concerns are misplaced. Obama would be far from the first president with limited political experience. JFK was a member of Congress for 6 years and Ronald Reagan was a governor for only 6 years prior to his first presidential run. I would suggest that our presidents with less political experience have not necessarily been bad presidents. The absence of a track record may well be better than a bad or inconsistent track record.

Posted by: vukasika | April 27, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

um it is not stupid to support someone whose opponent has under the table cash being raised by Oprah and who is right on the issues this small donor thing Obama claims is bs its scret fundraisers like in SF the other week that gets him money he doesnt have to report

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

“Hillary is the new HUCKABEE!!!”
Only difference is Huckabee knew when to get out for the good of the party. Hillary lost 11 straight, many by double digits until she won Ohio. Even there, he cut her huge lead down.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

tell that to the 10s of thousands that waited outside for hours to hear Hillary in Downtown asheville… it is not about ideologuy that hasnt won the last elections and will not win this one you so called obama progressives are dead wrong… give up your pandering bs

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

My mommy saz Hilarry a nice person. I only five years old but support her. Mommy say she honest…maybe if she know i support her, she’ll reid me a storry?

Posted by: Katie | April 27, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

1. Reverend Wright is a cult leader
2. Obama is a long-time member of the
cult
======
What is there to debate?

Posted by: harry | April 27, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

MikeMo – Ok, that was hilarious. ;-)

Posted by: jock59801 | April 27, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Anybody inspired by Obama’s empty,
filthy rhetoric???

Posted by: edith | April 27, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Hillary doesn’t even need this debate. I’m sure that on the next primary election eve she will get a free full hour on Larry King and C-SPAN will once again cover her rally instead of Obama’s just like they did in PA.

Posted by: Dee | April 27, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

when you are a member of a cult
and try to go public the Light of Reality
always hurts…
Get Real: Vote mCCain or Clinton 08

Posted by: rebecca | April 27, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Obama avoids debate with Hillary because he is less knowledgeable and less familiar with issues. He knows clearly whenever he sits down with Hillary talking about issues, he exposes his vulnerabilities. However, voters deserve debates between candidates to know who is better suited and prepared to be our commander-in-chief.
Shame on you, Obama. You should just bow out of the race if you can’t even debate Hillary on real issues. YOu will not win the general election!

Posted by: Cattie | April 27, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

We do not need any more debates. Hillary is proving all stereotypes of women with her behavior. If this is what a woman president looks like, I can happily wait another 100 years for one…and I am a woman.

Posted by: sick of the crazies on the blogs | April 27, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Between the 2 of them, how could anyone vote Democrat?

Posted by: plainsm | April 27, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Bob,DC,
Give a comment by the fact.
Who threat the DNC.
That’s Obama campaign and his supporters. You can check on the other blogs, there are bunches of them.
We, as Hillary supporters don’t need to threaten The DNC.
If The DNC abandon Hillary, we suggest Hillary becomes Independent and we vote for her.
There won’t be any violent as Obama supporters will do.
That’s how they represent their candidate, Obama.
They call it EDUCATED but NOT in BEHAVIOR.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 27, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

He is such a wimp. Do you suppose he sleeps with his lights on clinging to his blankie?
I’m hoping we elect a man or a woman for president, not a scared little boy.

Posted by: Bitter Voter | April 27, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Obama is a coward. If he does not debate Hillary, he is obviously just a coward. Not that there is anything wrong with that, nope.

Posted by: Decided | April 27, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Obama shows all the signs of his unreadiness for primetime.
But hey Dem Leaders, you can always nominate him, because you want to lose in Nov.
Right??? Losing is in your blood. Obama is right here for you help your cause.

Posted by: Jkan | April 27, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Blacks for Blacks…
97% black male voted for nobama..

Posted by: Larry | April 27, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Anyone who says they used to support HRC , but switched to Obama is full of it. In the 6 weeks before Pa. we found out about Reverand Wright, William Ayers, what Barack thinks of small town white people, what he thinks of a young girl having a baby ( ” shouldn’t be punished with a baby”) and so on… I know for a fact many people who like Obama switched to Hillary after all of this stuff came out -NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.
God Bless you Hillary Clinton. KEEP ON FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT!

Posted by: Katie | April 27, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Rick,
Thanks for the information.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 27, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

I am glad the media is finally waking up and realizing the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. ALL of the panelists today on Fox News, Bret Hume, Chris Wallace, Juan Williams, ALL stated that Hillary Clinton is the BETTER candidate in the Democratic race for the White House! GO HILLARY !!!!!!

Posted by: david from texas | April 27, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

I give him credit for not debating anymore. If I got my butt kicked like he did in the last debate I wouldn’t want to have anymore either.

Posted by: Carl | April 27, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Want to know what is really screwed about all of this? No matter who we elect president, we’re voting for a socialist. McCain, Obama or Hillary are all bad candidates. They want to take from you and me and then impose their morality on us and decide who needs our money more than we do. Scary huh? They want us to believe that they and not us are best at determining who among us should benefit at someone else’s expense. Noble but dangerous. Rest assured folks, that next January we will swear in someone who is even more dangerous than the “comically oblivious” Bush. Regardless of who we elect, we are voting for continued slavery. Wasn’t that abolished already?

Posted by: Robb | April 27, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

In the end it will be the Rezko story that puts the final nail in the coffin of the Obama campaign. Funny how Rezko started the downward spiral and will ultimately finish him.

Posted by: ChrisA | April 27, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

How many debate have we listen to more than I can remember. During the debate Hillary pretend to be nice to Obama or be mrs innocent. After the debate she goes out demeanor him like her unborn son. Then the press talking head will say who worn. Please less talk and face the financial problem we are facing and more to come. If Hillary want’s to debate she can go to all the networks and talk about debate. I’m happy Obama took the high road. He has showed us that he is not out their to say lies like Hillarry. By the way can you the press talk about rev wright without attaching him to Obama. They are not join by the hip. Obama is his own man. Did I read that MCcain said Obama is insensitive to poor problems. I think Obama should not even answer to that. That is the joke of the years politic.

Posted by: foday | April 27, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

How many debate have we listen to more than I can remember. During the debate Hillary pretend to be nice to Obama or be mrs innocent. After the debate she goes out demeanor him like her unborn son. Then the press talking head will say who worn. Please less talk and face the financial problem we are facing and more to come. If Hillary want’s to debate she can go to all the networks and talk about debate. I’m happy Obama took the high road. He has showed us that he is not out their to say lies like Hillarry. By the way can you the press talk about rev wright without attaching him to Obama. They are not join by the hip. Obama is his own man. Did I read that MCcain said Obama is insensitive to poor problems. I think Obama should not even answer to that. That is the joke of the years politic.

Posted by: foday | April 27, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

The ONLY reason Clinton wants a debate is to get more free airtime since she is strapped for cash. In addition, there is nothing further to be revealed about these candidates’ positions through more debates. This is not 1858, where we have newspapers and word of mouth as the only media. Candidates positions, history, personal lifes… everything is available to anyone with media access. We don’t need any more debates. It would just be another opportunity for Clinton to introduce divisive non-issues in her increasingly desperate effort to win the nomination.

Posted by: J Robinson | April 27, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

To define “deficient”, Wright needs to look in the mirror!

Posted by: david from texas | April 27, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Obama is quite the tool. Here’s a guy who really doesn’t want to be president that bad. Here’s a guy who’s not good at debates therefore he doesn’t debate unless he absolutely has to. I hope the super delegates are paying attention to his lack of steam. And if he uses the word FOLKS one more time I am going to jump off a bridge. Just more condescention from this guy. Hillary 2008.

Posted by: pinkbikini | April 27, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Big O, If you think about it, your going to reach a whole lot more voters by debating. Most people have television these days.Or do you think that you might be at a disadvantage?

Posted by: BikernAz | April 27, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

I noticed in Obama’s interview with Chris Wallace, like the other analysts, Obama skirted the issues and continued to have good rhetoric without any substance. Hillary would have defended her answers with facts, details, numbers. All Obama did was say….”Folks…..ummmmm…uh….ummmmm…..uh…ummmmmmm.” Seems like the the “heat” in the “kitchen” is getting to “HOT” for Obama! Hillary 08!

Posted by: david from texas | April 27, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

No more debates, please.

Posted by: jbate | April 27, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama? That seems to be the question. More interesting though should be the question of what drives these two candidates to run on “certain” way for office. Recently Hillary Clinton seems to have distinguished herself from her opponent by openly adopting the cut-throat attitude that “it takes someone who knows how the game is played in Washington” to be able to win. For his part, Barack Obama has acknowledged that Hillary is more than able to “play the Washington game,” but he is running on the principle of “changing business-as-usual in Washington”; in essence, he wants to change the “game.” Barack argues that the current political “game” in Washington has prioritized corporations and neglected every day Americans. This distinction brings to light the debate that is often swept under the carpet by politicians. Does power corrupt? Or do cynical politicians run for office knowing full well that politics is a “game” that has to be played a certain way to win? But most importantly, have we as a society become so accustomed to this “interpretation” of politics that we support cut-throat politicians like Hillary and see her campaign negativism as a strength rather than a corrupting weakness? I ask this because anyone who has followed the political career of Hillary will agree that at one point she believed in clean politics (just like Obama believes in now.) She greatly admired Martin Luther King Jr. and she helped to impeach Nixon, among many other things. It saddens me to see that Hillary has betrayed those principles that she once held dear to her heart. She has betrayed those that supported her when she was running a clean campaign. In her egocentricity she will rather destroy the Democratic Party and her Democratic colleague than to concede a fair defeat. Barack represents those principles and change that at one point drove the will of Hillary… by becoming just another career politician Hillary has betrayed herself…

Posted by: Juan | April 27, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Obama won’t debate because he has nothing to contribute. If it doesn’t have a slogan..ie: Hope, Change, Change, Hope ect. he becomes totaly lost.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 27, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

What’s wrong with this picture? Our campaign runs a TV ad Monday saying that the presidency is the toughest job in the world and giving examples of challenges presidents have faced and challenges the next president will face — including terrorism, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, mounting economic dislocation, and soaring gas prices. The ad makes no reference — verbal, visual or otherwise — to our opponent.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: Temmor | April 27, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Why would he waste anymore time with the loser? He needs to concentrate now on McCain!

Posted by: dgfiit | April 27, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

I was subjected to “ROOTS” for four days, I don’t want to be subjected to BLACK THEOLOGY and Obama whining about being a VICTIM for four years.

Posted by: Tina | April 27, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Raleigh Voter,
Great Post. I just wish this country would have been more informed about Barack prior to voting. I’m sure many would give anything to have their votes back. They were dupped.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 27, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Wright, “I am a VICTIM”
Obama, “I am BITTER”
Black Talk

Posted by: Martin | April 27, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Seriously,i am black-man that believes Rev. Jeremiah Wright went to the extreme talking about “God Damn America” statement,but listening to him talking on NAACP keynote speech today he’s absolutely honest man “Clintons” and republicans trying to use as scape goat on election issues. And it bother me a lot there’s some comments people left on the blog that’s so racist beyond things wright said which is obvious they can’t handle the truth coming out playing race card all because they felt white lady loosing on nomination. Honestly we “Americans” should stop breaking each other apart instead of bringing each other together colors of the skins is nonsense red blood flows in everybodies vains that’s the values we can share with whole world.
Obama ’08
Yes.We.Can

Posted by: Abdul Olufowobi | April 27, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Read the posts and see..which ones have the nastiest attacks, most of them have no bearing on the person running for office?
Questioning the opponent is one thing, but throwing out names and bringing up irrelevant information indicates ignorance and immaturity.

Posted by: Sarah | April 27, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Even if we assume that Mr. Wright’s sermons has some good content that does not negate the anti-American and racist statements he made. This is like somebody who might have done a lot of social work asking a free pass from media for a few hate crimes’ he might have committed.

Posted by: chiman | April 27, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Hillary, in all the states so far, has carried the white blue-collar vote and the Catholic vote. In Pennsylvania, she carried the white male blue collar vote 70% to 30% against Obama. No candidate has won the Presidency without carrying the blue collar and Catholic vote. Sorry, Obama, Chris Wallace gave you a chance to answer why you don’t connect with these voters and you said…”ummmmm…..uh….ummmm” typical Obama response. Right now, Hillary and Obama are tied at 45% according to Gallup for the best Presidential candidate, and are both tied at 47% in Indiana. I think Hillary will win Indiana, and will definitely close the gap to single digits in North Carolina. If she gets John Edwards endorsement this week, she will most likely take North Carolina as well. She already has Elizabeth Edwards endorsment. I see Obama finally being vetted and at the right time. His campaign is imploding. Go Hillary 08!

Posted by: david from texas | April 27, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Obama is chicken about debate. He cannot answer any questions.

Posted by: stephanie | April 27, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Obama is doing what’s best. He has to stop letting HRC define him and set the tempo of the campaign! He needs to speak to the people directly, answer their questions and work hard for votes! HRC and her supporters can debate among themselves! After 21 debates, enough is enough! If HRC is so experienced and so much better for the country, then let her sell it to the people and stop worrying about Obama not wanting or needing to debate her anymore!

Posted by: J.L. | April 27, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Patriots like W Bush. Democrats are attacking each other like fools. Calling each other racists, bigots. etc. Why don’t you come and join us.. Republicans, so you can learn to be civil. Most of the postings on this blog appear to be written by unhappy depressed, sad democrats. Come join the Republicans, let’s vote McCain in..
The Clintons can never win a general election (they are stained with scandals for good), and it seems some Democrats are not ready to see Democrat’s only chance at this time of running a competitive race – Obama become the nominee.
Please Vote McCain and forget the Obama/Clinton drama.

Posted by: Mark | April 27, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Sad, unhappy, depressed democrats – please join us and vote McCain for President. Stop attacking each other, come and join civilized Republicans. Let’s vote McCain in.. Forget all your troubles and all your anger… Come join us and be happy again, be civil again.

Posted by: Tim | April 27, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Democrats, we understand you are all distressed, unhappy with each other. Come join Republicans. Life is too short to be hateful, distressed and unhappy.
We Republicans can make you happy again. We are civil, we do not attack each other using the kind of language on this blog. Come join us and be happy. McCain for President. Forget the drama..

Posted by: Rachel | April 27, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I just listened to Rev. Wright’s speech. He is not the firebrand racist one might suspect from the blurbs. Also, he is an erudite person with many degrees and he speaks five languages. After listening to him, I am more receptive to judging him from a new perspective, not just the blurbs that have been looped over and over. From the blurbs I had developed an intense dislike; now I am willing to judge the man from the totally of his work.

Posted by: jbate | April 27, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

With Baracks poor performance in the last debate, its understandable that he wouldn’t want to subject himself to a repeat….or worse. Problem is, if he were to ever get into office he couldn’t run home to Chicago and hide everytime he doesn’t get his way. What a coward.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 27, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Just for the record – a ‘present’ vote in the IL legislature is an option because: 1) if a legislator does not like a bill and wants to make changes, the ‘present’ vote gives him or her that option, 2) if a legislator uses ‘present” when voting on a bill, it may also means that he or she is signaling that they have changed their mind about the bill. The ‘present’ vote is used by many IL legislators. So using the ‘present’ vote as a negative against Senator Obama is a moot point.

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I’m an Obama supporter! People talk about experience all of the candidates are U.S Senators. They all have the same type of experience. When it comes to age he’s over a decade older the requirement for running. Rev. Wright has done lots of great things even though he said some crazy comments. Obama really wants to change America he was for change from the beginning until the Iowa Caucus when the voter’s said the believe Obama is the one for change, then all the other candidates stared to say “I will bring out change too”. Barack Obama has two little girls and you know he’s going to try hard to prepare this country in a good position!

Posted by: Johnathon | April 27, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Apparently, Sen. Obama doesn’t care what his supporters [and others] want … wasn’t it just a week or so ago that thousands of people were hollering that the ABC debate wasn’t “substantial” enough for them?
HRC has offered 90 minutes of debate over nothing but policy issues and Obama’s response?
No.
Speaks for itself, doesn’t it?

Posted by: SM White, Irvine, CA | April 27, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

CAROLINA – It amazes me that you would say that Obama has a problem with the truth when you are supporting Hillary. She twists and turns in the wind whenever it is in her favor to do so. Her husbands whole administration was one lie after another and one scandal after another. I voted for Bill but, after the farce they made of this country – I say I don’t want the Clinton’s anywhere close to the White House. I blame Bill for the fact that we have Bush right now. Gore would never have lost if people were not sick of the garbage that went on in the Clinton years and retaliated by not voting Democratic. Gore lost because of the backlash againt Clinton. For those of you who keep pointing to Rev. Wright..get over it. It’s interesting to me that the press played those sound bites a million times but when Rev. Wright appeared on Bill Moyers Friday night…nary a word. That is because the man came across as decent, and they played THE WHOLE SOUND BITES – not just 30 seconds and you could see what was really said. And I’m glad Obama said no to Clinton on another of the endless debates. On her part it’s about money. When you’re low on funds…a debate is cheap TV exposure for her….plus if people don’t know their position after 21 debates they are brain dead anyhow. Have to run – those pesky snipers are outside again.

Posted by: Gretchenmom | April 27, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I agree Kim. Republican is the way to go. No racist, bigoted language. We do not tolerate hateful, racist, bigoted language.
We believe in One America. Come Join us.. As Kim said, life is too short to be frustrated, unhappy, bigoted and racist. Let’s work together to vote McCain in… For a civil discussion about the future of our country – visit.. johnmccain.com
Please we do not want racist, bigoted, haters of people of color because racist language is not allowed. We want peace loving, peaceful, hopeful people. Leave your unhappiness behind, and join the Republicans. How would you feel if you do not have to attack Obama or Clinton EVERY DAY, but you spend that time building up your country and values that important to your country.

Posted by: Janet | April 27, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

I think this is a cautious attitude Mr. Obama has. He has to represent all the people and if there is nothing to hide he should debate her. I saw him on Fox News the other day and that was a bold move on his part. I like him alot but want to see him act more like a leader. He has the potential but can’t run from debates and the people trying to hurt his campaign. I for one hope he changes his mind. I will vote for him.

Posted by: Stan | April 27, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

lily, The debates provide americans the opportunity to not only to hear their respective views on the issues, but to assess the candidates judgement and character. It’s wonderful that you have heard all the debates. However, everyone is not you, so there are many who have yet to hear fully each candidates position. I’m all for more debates. The more one learns, the better informed one can be when it comes time to pull the lever. Sadly, Barack doesn’t want to. My apoligies if I offended you by saying Barack is a coward. I’ll rephrase it. Barack runs from difficult situations. That’s not a strong trait for POTUS.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 27, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Obama is afraid to debate because he miserably failed the last debate when he was finally asked difficult questions. It appears that he can’t answer hard questions. I don’t think he’ll be able to skate to the general election without some hard debates. If Obama can’t stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen.

Posted by: NSY | April 27, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Clinton campaign workers, please contact headquarters for new talking points.
Sadstateofaffiars et al

Posted by: Lee | April 27, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Obama wants to debate and negotiate with dictators and large corporate sponsored lobbyist but he won’t debate his opponent in a presidential election?….hmmmm, once again, something just doesn’t jive here.

Posted by: Richard | April 27, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Lee: I’ll tell you what a “sad state of affairs” is; it is when a candidate’s supporter resorts to silly insults, rather than discuss the issues. The bottom line is that Obama does not have the courage to face Hillary in a “no-holds-barred” debate. And this is Presidential material?

Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Apparently, Sen. Obama doesn’t care what his supporters [and others] want … wasn’t it just a week or so ago that thousands of people were hollering that the ABC debate wasn’t “substantial” enough for them?
HRC has offered 90 minutes of debate over nothing but policy issues and Obama’s response?
No.
Speaks for itself, doesn’t it?

Posted by: beauty | April 27, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

sure does beauty, he knows he’ll get smoked, just like he knew he’d get smoked in MI if he left his name on the ballot.

Posted by: face cookies | April 27, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Obama is refusing to debate because the DNC has told him he will get the nomination, so all you Hillary supporters should just throw in the towel. It doesn’t matter if Hillary is really ahead in the popular vote, or if Hillary is attracting the blue collar base of the democratic party, and that neither candidate will reach the required 2025 pledged delegates needed to secure the nomination. Obama has claimed all along that “race” is not an issue in this campaign. EXCEPT, since he’s black, the superdelegates won’t give the nomination to Hillary, because she’s just a woman.

Posted by: rs | April 27, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

SadState,
the debates have been televised nationally. Why haven’t people been watching them if they are so important to them. They are both dems and their policies are pretty much the same. Again I ask what more can be learned. This does not make Obama a coward. This makes him a realist. The real debate is between the dem and republican canidates. I look forward to those debates. Until then these other debates are a waste of the canidates time. They should be out there talking to the people.

Posted by: lily | April 27, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Lee…Pumpkin,
Now there is no reason to attack Hillary supporters on a personal level. This blog is about Baracks refusal to debate. I suspect he does not want to debate because he is fully aware of the newest bombshell to hit his campaign, which is that he is now caught up in a money laundering scheme as reported by the LA Times this morning. His newest scandle is refered to as “Pay to Play” only this time there is irrefutable evidence. He cannot risk being asked about this in a national debate and he could be facing a Federal Indictment.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 27, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Learn, read, think, pray.
Why so much hate in this blog?
Look at the 3 different folks and learn, read, listen, think, and pray.
Mostly think.

Posted by: spike | April 27, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I love all of the slams against Hillary by the Obama minions. The issue is pretty clear here; it is not about “Hillary lies” or “Hillary sucks” etc. The issue is simply this: Does Obama have the guts to debate Hillary Clinton one-on-one, in an unmoderated debate. The simple answer is, NO, HE DOESN’T. You can’t blame him, actually. He reads a preprepared speech from a teleprompter better than anyone since Ronald Reagan, but when he has to step up to the plate and discuss the issues without a script, he falls flat. Poor Obama and his minions, he wants to take his toys home and hide. What a joke!

Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

This is b.S.—how many people let their preacher speak for them??Obama–is like the rest of us–slept through the sermon Jumped up when it was over shouted “Praise The Lord”.Shook,the pastors hand and took his family out to eat.Geez!!!

Posted by: orange cat | April 27, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

lilly, you said…”They should be out there talking to the people”.
What better place than on national television to talk to people. Actually, it should be a debate where they take audience questions.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 27, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Ready999: What an intelligent comment you made. Are you one of the supposedly “intelligent” Obama supporters?

Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

No debate. No spinsters. No spin rooms. No one liners. No political consultant talk. No Stephanopolos, No Gibson – political hitmen..

Posted by: Obe | April 27, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Calli, what more is there to debate about. They have done this 21 times and 4 with just the 2 of them. What more do you need to learn. Are you that slow that you can’t comprehend. They are both dems, and have basically the same policies. Let’s move on.

Posted by: lisa | April 27, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Hilly will say the same ole sh– Now she is saying Afghanistan needs more attention.WOW didn’t Obama say that a lonGGGGGGG time ago….All is does is preach opsssss her years of experiance oh my gosh nothing like taking credit for all her hubby done but when it comes to what the people don’t like she was against that.She is one woman that talks out of both sides of her mouth and she thinks the people are stupid and don’t know this ….She wants a debate for she is BROKE and this is FREE time on the air for her…NO MORE

Posted by: h | April 27, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Obama has a past.
Dear friends dont forget obama has a past yearning to guide the future of our country…
Is that what we Want???
Think clearly – its not complicated…

Posted by: Tom | April 27, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

MIGuy:
I would like to commend you, you are the first, I’m not kidding, the first, non-hateful Hillary supporter I have read on a blog.
If we are Democrats, we are of course going to rally around the eventual Democratic candidate. If you can’t do that (like 50% of Hillary’s supporters so they cant), you are not really a Democrat.
And you are not really the caring person you think you are, claiming to be a Democrat – in fact, if your own selfish aims outweigh everything else, why don’t you just take the next logical step and call yourself a Republican.
With the exception of you MIGuy, every other Hillary blogger I have read literally disgusts me. You hateful Hillraisers should be ashamed of yourself. And Hillary should try to at least get a sound bite in that isn’t race baiting or divisive or confrontational. She doesn’t have to act like a jerk to prove she is competent and tough. We’ve had a “tough” leader, do we need another one?

Posted by: Derek | April 27, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Mr Obama has become the NO candidate…NO debates for the poor/elderly and those working people who cannot afford internet or have time during the day to read/blog/converse due to family duties, Obama Said “NO to re-votes for Michigan Americans; even though three prominent men (Rendell, Corzyn and Carville) were going to pay for it . So,hopefully American voters will have a chance to tell him NO NO NO !!

Posted by: DaneNM | April 27, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

James,
Great point about the tax returns. This really is a very serious problem for Barack. Even Axelrod was blowing a gasket over this today……so you know it’s BAD news! All Axelrod could say is “This is just nuts”. No explanations, no defense…nada, zippo, zilch. I do beleive he is in it very deep this time.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 27, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

SadState, please, what more can be said at these debates. They have the same policies. I think most people have at this point decided who to vote for. Of course some have not. But I don’t think any more debates will really influence them. I must say how exciting this was in the beginning but the more this race goes on the more disgusted I become. I don’t blame the canidates. They both have their strengths and weeknesses. We just need a nominee now so that the dems take the white house. McCain is getting a free ride right now.

Posted by: lily | April 27, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Clinton wants another debate because she’s running out of money and this would be a freebe for her.
She wasted her donated millions on “junk” and then cries because Obama has more money than her to spend on ads. Waaaa!!!!! she is such a loser!!!
She doesn’t want to “debate”..she just wants to belittle the other person.. She’s better at that than Obama… that’s why she wants a debate.

Posted by: ConRae | April 27, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Apparently, Sen. Obama doesn’t care what his supporters [and others] want … wasn’t it just a week or so ago that thousands of people were hollering that the ABC debate wasn’t “substantial” enough for them?
HRC has offered 90 minutes of debate over nothing but policy issues and Obama’s response?
No.
Speaks for itself, doesn’t it?

Posted by: beauty | April 27, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

The negatives of Barack Obama are
simply overwhelming and undeniable
at this point…. HRC gets my vote in
Indianapolis…

Posted by: rita | April 27, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Andy Martin has entered the race for the 2008 Republican nomination for U. S. Senator from Illinois. THIS is the man who wrote the article about Obama’s money-laundering????? More dirty politics from the repugs trying to discredit Obama? Would not surprise me one bit if MSM does not pick this ‘story’ up since the real thing is happening in a California court with Paul vs. Clinton. THAT is reality.

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Obama: Hillary wants to debate me 1-on-1
:
That is so unfair!!!!

Posted by: partyisover | April 27, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Hillary failed to include BANKS on the list of groups she would stand up against. She voted for a 32% interest rate on credit cards. That means if you pay the minimum each month to the BANK for three years, you will have paid the BANK the total amount of the balance with no reduction in the principal amount. She has never had a three AM call from CITI BANK like WE have.

Posted by: DT/NC | April 27, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

There is nothing to debate, they both need to go to the voters present their solutions, they debated over 20 times, don’t want to hear about lapel pins or Bosnia, time is running out for these two…

Posted by: Joe | April 27, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

calli, people have basically made up their minds between the two so no more debates are needed. And the few who are still undecided will not be affected by debates. And their policies are the same. Do you not get this. They are dems and have the same views that may be slightly different but are still the same. If people don’t know the canidates after all this time then they just don’t care.

Posted by: lisa | April 27, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Catholics make up 24.5% of the US population. Hispanics make up 12.5% of the US population.
By far, these two groups totaling over 1/3 of US citizens DID NOT vote for O-bozo.
Surely that says something important!
**************************************
Yep, it is testament to the fact that 43.7% of all statistics are made up…
I am so sure that all the Catholics and Hispanics are so proud to have a stellar commentator such as yourself speaking for them….and I bet you entertain at bar mitzvahs too because you sound like an equal opportunity offender.

Posted by: disgusted | April 27, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Um, Barack, your lame explanation for not wanting to debate Senator Hillary Clinton “so rather than being in a studio, I want to want to make sure that I am reaching out to people where they live”. BS. Plain & simple. The last debate was watched by over 11 MILLION people – a new record. Sort of makes you able to answer more voters questions than hoofing it house to house huh Barack! Bottom line is you are actually afraid to debate Hillary. You are afraid that your followers will see [as they began to in Philadelphia] that the “emperor has no clothes”. Four pairs of shoes, yes, but no clothes.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | April 27, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Stan, have you watched their other debates. I am a typical white person that will vote for Obama because he is the best choice. I am tired of the Bush and Clintons running this country. You are just scared of a black man running our country. Please admit it and let’s go foward.

Posted by: erin | April 27, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

that’s a good point to ponder Sal. How can Obama be elected pres if he is in prison? hmmmmm……

Posted by: Jen | April 27, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Beautiful Blue Sky: I wish I could see your reaction when Obama gets the nomination.

Posted by: roger | April 27, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Unhappy, Distressed Democrats – Come join republicans – No more racist, bigoted fights. Come join a civil discussion. Vote republican.

Posted by: June | April 27, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

To Lisa: Well, you seem to know what the Democrats want. Since Obama copied all of Hillary’s policies, they are almost the same, except Obama wants to raise taxes on anyone making over $50,000.00 a year, and Hillary would raise taxes on anyone making over $250,000.00 a year. These little differences in their policies are the reason to debate – but Obama probably would have a very tough time remembering his own policies without the teleprompter or an ear piece, since he is just a mouth piece for the elite filty rich billionaires of the party.
By the way, why won’t Obama release his tax returns from 1999-2003? Something says that tentacles of corruption that have ensnared Gov. Blag are now slithering towards Obama.
SAY NO TO THE DNC CORONATION OF OBAMA!
DNC COUNT ALL 50 STATES VOTES!

Posted by: calli | April 27, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Obama will only serve a couple years.

Posted by: Rich Ricardo | April 27, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Obama does not want a debate because the whole thing has become silly. It is the silly-season.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Hillary is having problems with her honesty and trustworthiness ratings:
Of the three candidates for president (Dem/Rep) Obama still has the highest favorable rating and Hillary the lowest and the only one of the three with higher disapproval rating than approval rating.
Obama: 53% Favorable/ 40% Unfavorable (net +13 favorable)
McCain: 51% Favorable/ 41% Unfavorable (net +10 favorable)
Clinton: 47% Favorable/ 49% Unfavorable (net +2 Unfavorable)
http://www.newsweek.com/id/134254
Nuf’ said!

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

I support Hilary Clinton because I believe in her experience, her voice, and her promise of change through showing us all her plan, and the steps she will take to achieve. She gives striaght answers to her policies (although some may argue), and there is no doubt that she is an extremly patriotic candidate no matter what color, race or ethnicity the voters are.
While a debate would do her a great advantage at further showing her strengths as a candidate with answers and a plan on the spot, I believe it would be further damaging to the democratic party. A debate without mediators would be extremly interesting to watch, considering Obama is not very good at giving straight answers on the spot, but it would just continue to show that the democratic party can become at risk of falling apart.

Posted by: Jacqui B | April 27, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Calli, I never said what the dems want. You misread my post. But I don’t want to hear the BS that you post here. I have researched the canidates and will make my decision based on what I know, not on what people tell me on these blogs. You actually make me sick with your hatred.

Posted by: lisa | April 27, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

I was here on this blog 3 hours ago. Now all my blogs are gone. Looks like ABCNews doe snot like to hear from a Black man either. Everywhere we go the same ol’ racism keeps creeping up.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

HomeDiariesBreaking BlueE-Wire 2008Obama Mythology 101
by linfar, Sun Apr 27, 2008 at 12:18:19 PM EST
Here are the facts, not the spin:
State Sen. Obama helped secure thousands in state money for a Chicago entrepreneur who had paid him as a legal adviser.
Robert Blackwell, the Chicago entrepreneur, also became an Obama donor.
Obama’s Ethics disclosure forms do not make the link clear.
William Ayers Employed Barack Obama for eight years.
The Los Angeles Times broke the ethics story in today’s paper reporting that Obama used Illinois state letterhead to request a $50,000 tourism promotion grant for a longtime political donor and employer, Chicago entrepreneur Robert Blackwell, Jr. and his company Killerspin. Obama mailed the request within months after receiving a final $8,000 per month retainer from Blackwell’s company Electronic Knowledge Interchange.
Blackwell paid Obama the retainer to give legal advice to his growing technology firm. The monthly sum from this Blackwell company totaled $112,000. Then, with support from Obama, other state officials and an Obama aide who went to work part time for Killerspin, this Blackwell Company eventually obtained $320,000 in state grants between 2002 and 2004 to subsidize its table tennis tournaments.
Killerspin specializes in table tennis, running tournaments nationwide and selling its own line of equipment and apparel and DVD recordings of the competitions.
Obama’s staff said the senator advocated only for the first year’s grant — which ended up being $20,000, not $50,000. The day after Obama wrote his letter urging the awarding of the state funds, however, Obama’s U.S. Senate campaign received a $1,000 donation from Blackwell.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/ nation/la-na-killerspin27apr27,1,7266833 .story?page=1&track=rss
Now about Willaim Ayers
In addition to this failure to ethically disclose an important donor, Obama has been breathtakingly misleading about his relationship with William Ayers. In the past Obama described Ayers as an “acquaintance.” He also said in the recent ABC debate that Ayers is “Not someone I’ve accepted endorsement of, it’s not someone I exchange ideas with on a regular bassis.”Whopper!! Pinocchio!! William Ayers empoyed Obama for eight years as the Director of the Annenberg Challenge Board.
Thanks to Larry Johnson here http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/26/ why-is-obama-hiding-the-truth-about-will iam-ayers-follow-the-money/

Posted by: Jack | April 27, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Rev. Wright was on CNN and FOX news giving a speach about Change. He said different does not mean inferior or deficient, it simply means different.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Hilllary and her camp said that the popular vote mattered last year, then didn’t matter, then perhaps matters again; that delegate counts mattered in January but not in April; that caucuses mattered in August but not in January; that black voters mattered until they didn’t; that young people never mattered; that most states in the Midwest don’t matter, except for Ohio……. Seems Hillary has to keep moving the bar.

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

BlackMan, that’s because you make racist comments. That’s why you are deleted. So quit being a typical black racist, ok?

Posted by: Stu R. Dess | April 27, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Blackman – Rev. Wright gave a great speech – glad you watched! :)

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Many of you support Hillary despite the fact that she is a certified liar, because the other choice is black.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

LA Times, April 27, 2008
OBAMA DONOR RECEIVED STATE GRANT
After an unsuccessful campaign for Congress in 2000, Illinois state Sen. Barack Obama faced serious financial pressure: numerous debts, limited cash and a law practice he had neglected for a year. Help arrived in early 2001 from a significant new legal client — a longtime political supporter. Chicago entrepreneur Robert Blackwell Jr. paid Obama an $8,000-a-month retainer to give legal advice to his growing technology firm, Electronic Knowledge Interchange. It allowed Obama to supplement his $58,000 part-time state Senate salary for over a year with regular payments from Blackwell’s firm that eventually totaled $112,000.
A few months after receiving his final payment from EKI, Obama sent a request on state Senate letterhead urging Illinois officials to provide a $50,000 tourism promotion grant to another Blackwell company, Killerspin.
With support from Obama, other state officials and an Obama aide who went to work part time for Killerspin, the company eventually obtained $320,000 in state grants between 2002 and 2004 to subsidize its tournaments. The day after Obama wrote his letter urging the awarding of the state funds, Obama’s U.S. Senate campaign received a $1,000 donation from Blackwell.
But Obama portrays himself as a lawmaker dedicated to transparency and sensitive to even the appearance of a conflict of interest.
Recently, Obama expressed regret over a property deal with Illinois power broker Tony Rezko after Obama was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004. In an interview this spring with the Chicago Sun-Times, Obama said his regret was not just because the real estate and restaurant entrepreneur was under criminal scrutiny, but because he was “a contributor and someone doing business before the state.”
Blackwell, was a political supporter and friend as well. Both men lived on Chicago’s South Side. Blackwell, a savvy and successful entrepreneur, was one of the first donors to Obama’s early campaigns, including the state senator’s failed bid for a congressional seat in 2000. In the presidential race he is credited on Obama’s website with committing to raise $100,000 to $200,000 for Obama’s campaign. The monthly retainer paid by EKI was sent to the law firm that Obama was affiliated with at the time, currently known as Miner, Barnhill & Galland, where he worked part time when he wasn’t tending to legislative duties. The entire EKI retainer went to Obama, who was considered “of counsel” to the firm, according to details provided to The Times by the Obama campaign and confirmed by Miner. Obama’s tax returns show that he made no money from his law practice in 2000, the year of his unsuccessful run for a congressional seat. But that changed in 2001, when Obama reported $98,158 income for providing legal services. Of that, $80,000 was from Blackwell’s company.
In 2002, the state senator reported $34,491 from legal services and speeches. Of that, $32,000 came from the EKI legal assignment, which ended in April 2002 by mutual agreement, as Obama ceased the practice of law and looked ahead to the possibility of running for the U.S. Senate. . Illinois ethics disclosure forms are designed to reveal possible financial conflicts by lawmakers. On disclosure forms for 2001 and 2002, Obama did not specify that EKI provided him with the bulk of the private-sector compensation he received. As was his custom, he attached a multi-page list of all the law firm’s clients, which included EKI among hundreds. Illinois law does not require more specific disclosure. Though Obama’s formal efforts for Killerspin consisted of writing a letter and a proclamation, the nitty-gritty of obtaining state grants fell to a former state Senate and campaign aide to Obama, Dan Shomon.
Shomon, working part time for Obama’s campaign and for Killerspin, helped prepare Killerspin’s initial grant application in 2002. Still working part time with Obama, Shomon helped Killerspin secure a $200,000 grant for its 2003 tournament and a $100,000 grant for its 2004 tournament.

Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Sandy :
I could not miss it for the blogs.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Senator Obama does a great job talking straight off the cuff when he is holding town hall meetings…. he has no telepromoter then so points contray to his speaking without the benefit of a telepromter are moot.
BlackMan — ABC does eliminate some blogs when there are too many on a stream – not to worry.

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

RH, you are simpleton. Can’t you debate real issues. Oh maybe you are the real chicken then. You have nothing to say. I got it now.

Posted by: candy | April 27, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Stu R Dess:
No. Just my name is enough to get you shivering and peeing in your pants. You all just want to spin things the way you like without any challenge.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

You can run but you can’t hide. We’re on to you.

Posted by: Mack | April 27, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

James – the stuff you quote came from the same Andy Martin article – a Republican running for the IL senator seat. One thing I always tell my students is check your resources – many are biased. Harp on the Martin article all you want – the damage will come to Hillary’s camp from Paul vs. Clinton – not allegations but facts presented in court.

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

I don’t support “ARROGANT CHICKEN” as you put it. I support the Hon. Sen. and distingushed gentle man Barack Obama.
BECAUSE HE IS BETTER FOR THIS COUNTRY THAN Hilarry.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

The debates and primaries are for show casing the strengths and weaknesses of the candidates and their solutions for issues for the voters. The debates and the primaries are for the people so they can make an informed decision and vote for who is the best candidate who demonstrates Presidential qualities, experience, able to answer question easily with real substance and to the point, support the plans and solutions for issues that will benefit the people not the elitist aristocracy or hidden radical agendas. Obama refuses to do any more debates because he is a sore loser he performed miserably by not answering the questions with straight forward to the point answers and lost all of the debates. Obama is scared that his elitist beliefs and attitudes towards the people of the USA and his disrespect and hate of the USA and its people will be completely exposed. Obama is scared that his true greedy desires in obtaining power and money will be completely exposed. Obama is scared his actions, lack of action and very questionable associates clearly demonstrate Obama’s true intentions and agendas. Obama is scared that all the negative things Obama has accused Hillary of doing and saying in this campaign are actually the very actions and things Obama has been doing and saying not Hillary. Obama is scared his lack of confidence and inexperience will be completely exposed. Another very important reason Obama is scared and will not debate is Obama can’t remember all the lies he has told during his campaign. Here are 76 lies and counting that Obama has told us at http://www.audacityofhypocrisy.com/?page_id=15 Find more lies told by Obama at http://www.hillaryclinton.com Click on the icon Fact Check. If Obama loses the Democratic Nomination for President his supporters say they will riot in the streets. Obama supporters want to turn the USA into third world countries like Kenya and Zimbabwe. Rioting in the streets because, Obama has been exposed as a spoiled brat, weak, wimpy, arrogant, elitist, inexperienced, corrupt, racist and radical to the extremes are character traits, beliefs and actions of Obama that will cause him to lose this race for the President of the USA. Rioting in the streets is very immature and stupid like Odinga, Obama’s cousin who incited riots and death squads in Kenya. Mugabe did the same in Zimbabwe because he is a mentally challenged immature violent sore loser like Odinga. The USA is a country that provides many freedoms for its people example: right of free speech and the right to vote as we please. Be smart make an informed decision and vote for the most qualified and experienced candidate for President of the USA Hillary Clinton who respects the people, who listens to the people, has compassion for the people of the USA. Hillary will fix the economy and fight for the people of the USA by creating solutions for real changes that benefits all the people of the USA. Hillary will unite the people of the USA, restore the US Constitution and win back the respect of our people and the respect for our government of the USA world wide. Hillary has real substantial solutions for real changes that make sense and will help all of us. Go to Hillary’s web site and explore it http://www.hillaryclinton.com Look at Hillary’s detailed solutions for real changes on the economy, healthcare, education, veterans benefits, Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Read Hillary’s speeches, fact check, attack timeline (of Obama attacks on Hillary), Women for Hillary, and all the other great places on Hillary’s web site to find out more about Hillary so you can make a informed decision and vote for Hillary. While you are visiting Hillary’s web site http://www.hillaryclinton.com make donations to Hillary’s campaign.

Posted by: Bob4USA | April 27, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

It’s hard to debate with a mouthful of waffles.

Posted by: Mack | April 27, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Just as difficult to debate with a mouth full of lies.

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Sandy: The reason the Andy Martin article concentrates on the issue of money laundering, is that all the money was paid to a law firm where Obama worked part-time, and then the law firm paid the exact sum to Obama. I, myself, am “Of Counsel” to a major law firm in my area. An “Of Counsel” relationship is generally one where the attorney doesn’t actually work for the firm, but assists the firm on various ad hoc issues. If someone wanted to place me on retainer for legal advice, I would merely have them pay me the money, in my name. There is generally no reason to use another entity as a conduit, if all of the funds will be paid to one “Of Counsel” attorney who is doing all of the work. The appearance is that Obama did not want to be linked directly to this steady stream of income from his political benefactor. Hopefully, the truth will come out in the end.

Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Make donations to Hillary’s campaign. Are you kidding me. Bob, what job to have with her campaign because you are not just a blogger. Hillary is now desperate, she needs money. She has run a poor campaign. Your post is makes me laugh.

Posted by: erin | April 27, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Go to Senator Obama’s site – his solutions are also posted and I can say it in a short post – not one that goes on and on and on…..

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

RH you are the chicken for not answering a post that was directed at you.

Posted by: lisa | April 27, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

BlackMan, the 60′s are over.
get over it, wake up and get with the program. It’s called society.
You cant live off whitey forever, get a job and get that chip off your shoulder, bro.

Posted by: trooper | April 27, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

James: Then let’s go back to Hillary and the Rose Law Firm – an ‘upstanding’ law firm – her misdeeds while employed by this ‘reputable’ firm was a disgrace. And the there is Hillary’s ‘work’ during the Watergate investigation:
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

Posted by: sandy | April 27, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Rev. Wright said he is not running for the Oval office but he has been running for the lord a long time. Too bad you can’t vote against him. He is not running.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Telling the truth about Obama is not racism

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Macks says ………….
It’s hard to debate with a mouthful of waffles.
You are all idiots. Did you even go to school. Sounds like a drop out to me

Posted by: jj | April 27, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Sandy: That story has already been debunked by Media Matters.
Media Matters
Limbaugh repeats assertion by Watergate committee counsel Zeifman that he “fired” Clinton — an assertion reportedly contradicted by Zeifman himself
Summary: Rush Limbaugh asserted that Jerry Zeifman, former counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, was “the guy who fired” Sen. Hillary Clinton when she worked as an attorney on the committee, apparently basing his claim on an article that cites Zeifman. But Zeifman’s reported claim is undermined by his own previous reported acknowledgement that he did not fire Clinton and did not have the power to do so.

Posted by: James | April 27, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Trooper:
I bet I am richer than you are – whitey.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 27, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Hillary is not desperate she has made progress since Obama and his appologists keep self destructing

Posted by: staniam | April 27, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Blackman, a republican wanting to cause trouble. You don’t have to, the dems are in major turmoil

Posted by: myst | April 27, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Myst:
No. Democrats are worse than Republicans. At least you know ehere the republicans stand. Sen. Liebermans like you can’t confuse me. Even over the Internet.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 28, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

21 debates and you accuse Obama of being scared? She’s a pathological liar and is tearing the dem party apart.Do you people just pick and choose what you hear and read or what? You Hillary thugs need to get a grip on reality and check out the new Paul vs Clinton fraud case going on in California. How about the relationship the Clintons have with Rev. Wright that she failed to tell all you Hilbots about? How about the fact the Hill’s nat’l co-chair of her campaign banked at least $7500.00 from Rezko himself? I would rather have someone with less experience than someone who’s experience equates to deceit, lies and scandals for the last 30 years. I don’t want that back in the white house.

Posted by: mandm | April 28, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

BlackMan you are a disgrace to your race.

Posted by: bill billington | April 28, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Honestly some democrats are trying to get the best candidate on the top of the ticket and people t ry to call that racism

Posted by: staniam | April 28, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Staniam said: Exactly. There is a huge double standard working in the nomination process. Obama and his surrogates can say anything they want about Hillary, but if Hillary or Bill push back, the race card raises it’s ugly head. Maybe many of you don’t remember, but just before South Carolina in the debates, Tim Russert busted Obama for his 4 pages of “race card” talking points his press agents were passing out. If you’d like to see it again, here it is on video: Obama is forced to admit his campaign played the race card: http://tinyurl.com/6gcstl

Posted by: James | April 28, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

bill billington;
Name calling is for clueless arrogant illitrates. Are you one of them?

Posted by: BlackMan | April 28, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Alright, I have enough of you all here. I moving to another station.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 28, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

My God, James. You BELIEVE Rush Limbaugh – the same assanine character who is advocating riots in Denver? Now I see why you support Hillary….

Posted by: sandy | April 28, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Sandy: You totally misunderstood the article from Media Matters. It was DEBUNKING Rush Limbaugh’s assertion that Hillary was fired; the same story you posted earlier. So, no, I do not believe Rush Limbaugh, and neither did Media Matters.

Posted by: James | April 28, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Sorry, James, I did misunderstand! My mistake….

Posted by: sandy | April 28, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

And if Senator Obama pushes back, Hillary plays the sexism card and cries…..

Posted by: sandy | April 28, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Yea James talk about context… thats what President Clinton was talking about in radio thing where he had proff that Obama was the one who srated the race bating and apparentlty people who think Clinton supporters are uneducated are not quite ready for prime time themselves!

Posted by: staniam | April 28, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Obamamama:
Before I leave. I must say that you don’t deserve to be shot as i said earlier. That was not right, you have the right to say whatever you want. I just think you are not a true Obama supporter. You make very incitefull statements that is not in line with Obama’s views in an effort to annoy readers here – another Hillary supporter trick.

Posted by: BlackMan | April 28, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Hillary’s support, even her financial base is slipping. ‘More than 70 top Clinton donors wrote their first checks to Obama in March, campaign records show. Clinton’s lead among superdelegates, a collection of almost 800 party leaders and elected officials, has slipped from 106 in December to 23 now, according to an Associated Press tally.’

Posted by: sandy | April 28, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

BlackMan, why don’t you take your boy Obambi and slime back to the hood you both came from, bro.

Posted by: al sharpton | April 28, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Hillary is nasty, but she is not tough. Hillary is a classic whiner. She and Bill whine about everything that doesn’t go well for them. Unlike Harry Truman, who also said, “the buck stops here,” she and Bill accept responsibility for nothing and blame others, especially the media, when things go wrong or their deceptions are exposed.
Hillary and Bill whine about Democratic Party activists, young voters, running as a female, the media in general, the media catching her fabricating her history (bringing peace to Ireland, opposing NAFTA, facing sniper fire in Bosnia, etc.), the appeal of hope, Obama’s eloquence, money, donors, Democratic Party rules. Last week, Hillary blamed the “activist base” of the Democratic Party for many of her electoral defeats, claiming, without a shred of evidence, that activists had “flooded” state caucuses and “intimidated” her supporters. Rather than accept responsibility for her campaign’s well-documented failure adequately to plan for the caucus states, and despite her repeated claim she is the candidate “ready on Day One,” she attacked core Democratic Party supporters. Hilary cannot attack core Democrats an expect to survive. She is burning her bridges from the inside out. She is going to be lucky if she can hold onto her Senate seat.

Posted by: sandy | April 28, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Sandy
Hillarys support is growing the SDs will overturn Obama in Denver case closed he is too dirty as far as connections

Posted by: staniam | April 28, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

If Obama wins the nomination he will unite Hillary’s supporters with McCain’s supporters.

Posted by: Mack | April 28, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Sandy, The Clintons are core Democrats,Obama has insulted core democrats like blue colar workers, “uneducated Americans, ad rural America. He is the one whining that he can not debate because on debates he appear so inefficient. He has too many “bad judgments” and too many bad relationships and friends.

Posted by: libre | April 28, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

Does Obama think that by losing the tie an neatly folding his white dress shirt sleeves he is going to relate to blue collar workers? yet another elitist miscalculation on his part. He is just not credible or electable.

Posted by: libre | April 28, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

no experience? No Resume? No job! sorry next!

Posted by: ruthmatters | April 28, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

One of the big reasons Obama will not agree to debate with Hillary is because of his corrupt illegal actions. Obama supporters what will happen when Obama is arrested during the general election or shortly there after for his money laundering with Blackwell and the many other charges will be brought against him. If this happens during the GE then we will end up voting for the person Obama will choose for Vice President. If its not Hillary then no Democrat will have voted for this person during the primaries and caucuses. Think about that Obama supporters and DNC. If he should get elected. We still end up with his Vice President. Either way if Obama becomes the Democratic Nominee all Democrats lose. We also lose if McCain wins. Why risk four more year of Bush politics with McCain by making Obama our nominee. It doesn’t make any sense at all to vote for Obama or for the Superdelagates to support him. The only Democarat who can beat McCain and make real changes happen that benefit the people of the USA and unite the people of the USA is Hillary.

Posted by: Bob4USA | April 28, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

Rezko helped Obama in 5 election runs. Rezko with his North Shore mansion could bring in as much as $70,000 from political donors in one night. In the heat of a campaign, Obama said he sometimes talked strategy with Rezko daily. ven after indictment Obama recommended Rezko to get government money and contracts.

Posted by: libre | April 28, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

Even after Rezko’s idictment, Obama received land from Rezko’s wife after his political favors.

Posted by: libre | April 28, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

Obama is affraid to debate, sniper fire or not. He doesnot know what to say without a written speech. He is unelectable. How could he fight in the General elections if he frezzes at any question on the issues and he is affraid to debate? His character is not strong enough. What was he doing on Feb 4 1999?

Posted by: libre | April 28, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am

So now to Rezko we have to ad Blackwell as beneficiary of Obama’s “favors” with the Illinois taxpayers money in exchange for financial personal gain. Obama is a liar and a dirty old style POLITICIAN. Maybe he does not want to debate, because he doe not want to explain why he sold Illinois taxpayers for his benefit.

Posted by: libre | April 28, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

On Friday in Indiana, Obama talked tough in response to a question: “I get pretty fed up with people questioning my patriotism.” And, he continued, “I am happy to have that debate with them any place, anytime.” He’s happy to have fantasy debates with unnamed people who are allegedly challenging his patriotism. But he’s not willing to have a real debate with the real person he’s competing against for the nomination.
I guess that just about says it all, he’d rather have a fantasy debate than a real debate!!
Is that what his presidency going to look like a fantasy? Aren’t we going through one of the presidency’s now? All title no substance!

Posted by: Whyputanaem | April 28, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Look I don’t care about the race, gender, age etc of any candidate.
I do not want to vote for Obama because have never cared for agitators (organizers). I don’t like how he won his first public office. I am suspicious of how he won his way into the Senate. I find these in direct contrast to his moral stance and especially in regards to resolving Fl and MI.
As far as the Wright thing is concerned its something time will clarify an it doesn’t affect my descision. the way he handles these problems is poor.
I was disappointed ed that he gave this big rehearsed speech responding to the Wright issue. Instead of just talking sincerely. He then turned it around about how he has been a victim of race even in his own family. He just went off point to deflect and garner sympathy. He is not good at being direct. I find no tangible depth.This does not mean I am enamoured with the other two candidates but they have more strength to me.

Posted by: just me | April 28, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

For those who say that Hillary’s PA win was pretty much because “older” voters are racist…..Those “older” voters were the generation that changed America in the 60′s and 70′s….they were the bra-burning, equal-rights marching, peace-loving, Woodstock-singing young people, who really changed America….don’t you think they know something about change? If they are voting for Hillary, they must believe she can bring about that change now…just like SHE did in her younger years in college…..

Posted by: Kahlua | April 28, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Only the candidate that is losing screams for a debate. History shows us this. Obama doesn’t want to waste his time with Hillary.
But I find it interesting that he is more than ready to debate McRead from the teleprompter.
He should only need one debate for McCain.

Posted by: DAVID NH | April 28, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

I agree with DAVID NH. Why would he want to debate her? And I too think John McCain is going to have trouble in a debate with the Democratic candidate (which will be Barack Obama.) Senator Clinton agreed with the DNC to strip FL and MI before this process started and now she complains about that decision. She didn’t have a plan for the cauci and now she complaiins cauci aren’t a fair process. (I refuse to call them “caucuses”) She is desparately behind and needs a debate to attempt to catch up. If she was leading she would not want a debate either. (Like when she refused to debate in her Senatorial re-election bid last time.) To paraphrase her and her husband, if you don’t like what you have cooked, get out of the kitchen.

Posted by: TSnow27604 | April 28, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

The truth about Obama is “What you see is what you get!” He’s real and authentic. No faking. For those who are talking about Rev. Wrights comments, “You need to listen to the whole sermon instead of snippets,” and I’m pretty sure that you’re whole mindset about this man would be changed. The truth is that, the media gave the world a half statement, why didn’t they play the entire sermon. Don’t be brainwashed. OBAMA’S THE NEXT PRESIDENT!!!! He’s already won. For the superdelegates to give it to Hillary when the numbers are in Obama’s favor just means the people doesn’t have a say, and the politicians will do what’s best for their interest, not the people. It’s time that we be real with ourselves. It needs to be called right down the line, to not do that is to agree with what Bush did against Kerry and Al Gore!!!!!

Posted by: Egza | April 28, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Another reason Obama will not debate. Once this money laundering scam of Obama’s picks up a head of steam in the TV and Radio media, Obama will be the one who has to quit and withdraw his name from the race for the nomination for President. He will be indicted charged and convicted. This ought to give the Republicans more fodder for the general election. O golly gee Obama will be taken off in handcuffs what pretty sight for the DNC and Democrats. The Republicans will be dancing in the streets. Oh Yeah. We Democrats better get used to Obama behind bars in a state penitentiary now. We Democrats and the DNC need to unite and make Hillary our Democratic Nominee for President before it’s too late or McCain will be the next President. OUCH that will really hurt American’s pocket books, jobs, education and war will reign supreme for greedy Aristocrats. Obama supporters it is time to abandon Obama or suffer the consequences of Obama’s criminal deeds with Obama.

Posted by: Bob4USA | April 28, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Why would anyone want to bring the Clintons back to Washington???
Scandals followed them from the first two terms 16 years ago. Special interests groups have brought Hillary and Bill-they are poster couples for the Lobbyist-if re-electing past candidates is the American way-then we are lost as a nation,because in essence we are re-electing Bill Clinton-Hillary has never ran anything,she has exposure-no experience!!!!!!!

Posted by: Raymond | April 28, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Regardless of the rhetoric or excuses, we all know that after the last debate spanking Hillary gave Obama, he is simply too “skeert” to get on the stage with her again.
And this man is supposed to be able to stand up to world leaders and represent the interests of the United States?
He can’t even represent himself without stammering, looking down, and plagiarizing someone else’s words.
Just keep Jeremiah Wright speaking on Obama’s behalf. That will keep Obama in the Trinity Church where he belongs.

Posted by: Jayhawk | April 28, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Sen. Obama has every right to decide if he wants to debate again. I see no point in rehashing the same tired old strains that we have all come to know quite well by this point. The situation with Obama/Clinton will come to a head by early summer. The democratic party cannot afford for this to go to their convention. A Political disaster will erupt.

Posted by: A Teacher | April 28, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Logical Stinker writes in and sez:”I will be voting for who ever wins this contest being it Clinton or Obama. I am a democrat and believe in both of their ideas”
Which one? Taxing or spending?

Posted by: brwillham | April 28, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

“I noticed again today that Sen. Obama repeated his opposition to giving low-income Americans a tax break, a little bit of relief so they can travel a little further and a little longer, and maybe have a little bit of money left over to enjoy some other things in their lives,” McCain said.
“Sen. Obama wants to raise the capital gains tax, which would have a direct effect on 100 million Americans,” McCain said. “That means he has no understanding of the economy and that he is totally insensitive to the hopes and dreams and ambitions of 100 million Americans who will be affected by his almost doubling of the capital gains tax.”. Obama said he would not raise the capital gains tax higher than it was under President Reagan – he will raise capital gain taxes – that is a lot especially for middle class families who depend on capital gains as their core investment and to outgrow the ongoing inflation.
If you are a voter for Obama, wouldn’t you care about your capital gains? Mitt Romney would eliminate all capital gain taxes, so I’d definitely vote for McCain against Obama if Romney is the running mate.

Posted by: tiger | April 28, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Two statements showing ignorance and Stupidity.
1..I will never vote Republican
2..I will never vote Democratic
Personally I am going to vote with what I have left of my brain and choose the best person for the job. But it is unfortunate we do not have any good choices to choose from. I for sure do not want higher taxes but a FAIR tax. For sure we do not want another Clinton in the White House..Did we not learn any lessons from the first one?
The 2 party system is destroying the country.

Posted by: Barnacle | April 28, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

For all those Obama supporters (like Egza 10:22 AM) who are constantly advising the rest of us to watch all of Wright’s sermons instead of just snippets…. please stop this silly line of defense. I pay lots of attention to politics, and I read a lot. However, I am not going to see all of his sermons. I am not even going to see all of one of his sermons. I can guarantee you that 99.999% of voters are not going to see all of even one of his sermons. I did see all of his interview with Bill Moyers, and guess what… it did not change my opinion of him. He is intelligent, well spoken, and a good advocate for black Americans… but not necessarily for America. He is not helping Obama a bit.

Posted by: Chris NY, NY | April 28, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

For Obama supporters – He is the most inspirational leader. They are blinded by his smooth talks – and forget to read the obvious.
If he was so inspirational, then why he failed to inspire people of his church and the pastor to be less anti american or whites? after all, whites faught for their slavory – Well i am not white i am brown.
Also if he was so inspirational then why he could never inspire his own wife to be proud of America? Now don’t tell us obama, that he never knew his wife does not love america earning $350K a year.

Posted by: namrep | April 28, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

It’s a big deal to me for a candidate to be honest about core beliefs. I can’t believe Obama’s story about not hearing or knowing about the Rev’s more incendiary sermons. Did he have no contacts within his own church to tell him — even vaguely — what was being sermonized? He knew Wright, enough to tell him to stay out of the spotlight, very early on in his campaign. And, I’ve seen enough excerpts from Wright’s sermons to know that some comments were taken out of context. Others were not. I just cannot & will not accept that Obama did not know — and somewhat agree — with the sentiments of his own pastor. Silly for him to even try to pull off that crapola on the voters. Just how stupid does he believe we are??? Wright has every right/responsibility to advocate for his race. It’s Obama’s lying, this farce about not knowing, I object to.

Posted by: Trying to earn a living | April 28, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Chicago is disintegrating and Obama is nowhere to be found. What kind of president would he be? Ineffective if the current situation is any indication.

Posted by: Kitty | April 28, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I hate to admit this but I have spent way too much of my time reading all this. I’ve got better things to do. But one more thought – in order to play ball you have to show up at the game!

Posted by: Dave | April 28, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Then No-Obama! LOL.

Posted by: no debate? | April 28, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

He does not want to debate because his debating skills are poor. Hillary would surely win this type of debate.
I would love to see it though…Obama’s head would eventually explode…anyone see “Scanners”?

Posted by: babs | April 28, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

The Date…please, you were NEVER a Hillary supporter…if you were, your support would be stronger than ever.
I have never been an Obama supporter…I always felt he was a cocky, smug, “I know better than everyone else” elitist. hmmmm…turns out I was right. AND I think Wright and his Black Liberation Theology helped to create this in him (and his wife). I sure hope all Black Churches don’t sound as mean spirited like Wright…I would be so dissapointed.

Posted by: babs | April 28, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I think that people who say “I used to support so and so”. Never really supported that person in the first place.

Posted by: KURT | April 28, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

If this man can’t even stand up to his opponent, how could he be expected to stand up in the general election? How could he be expected to stand up for America when she is being attacked by terriorists? With Clinton, I feel secure knowing that she will be fighting for me and for my country every day.

Posted by: CNL | April 28, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

I know I know…it’s going to hurt when Obama is Pres…I know…this country is so afraid to change…just live on the pack of lies and deceptions we live by. “God Bless America” Right!

Posted by: KJ | April 28, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Mark my words! Hillary or Barack wins the Democratic Party’s nomination, THERE WILL DEMAND TO RECOUNT FROM THE LOSER. Why? because that is their natural talent that was so well demonstrated by Al Gore in 2000: RECOUNT, REHASH EVERYTHING TO DEATH. Just look at Hillary! My gosh! After 21 debates, she still wants another one. What will prevent Hillary to demand a recount at least once if she loses the nomination.

Posted by: ablanche08 | April 28, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Obama is a chicken. He is afraid because he does not know what to say if questioned on the spot and on critical issues. He only follow Hilalry lead so that he can say something. He needs to ask his advisers first before he can say somethiong right and looks eloquent.
Here is another tactics aside from not debating…Latest Obama’s tactic is to have Wright give a long speech (I mean church sermon) last Sunday to see how good their church is. But that is not the issue. The issue is that both of them LIED and trying to mislead again the American people by saying good things. You can not fool the Americans. He said that Black preacher shouts when they preach. There is nothing wrong with shouting when preaching. What is wrong is that he shouted and mocked the entire nation specifically after the 9/11 attack. He and Obama need to start taking responsibility for their bad actions. He also sad that Obama is just a politician. Wright is also politician by giving his speech (sermon I mean) to cover up the bad comments he made and actually just justifying his mistakes and used the racial card as an EXCUSE. Being racial to African Americans are being overused, misused and is an EXCUSE for their personal interest. Really bad!!!
You and Obama lied and does not take responsibility of what you said. Instead you both make reason to justify you irresponsible and very degrading comments. You both mocked the Americans. Being bias to African American has been overused, misused and used as an EXCUSE so that theyt can get away from their bad actions/behavior. You can not fool America this time.
Beware North Carolinians and Indianians….Obama lied and just a Politician.
Mr. Wright, CNN interview, said Obama condemned his comments about american because Obama is a Politician. Yeah right, Obama wants to get away with it condemning Wirght’s comments to get oput of trouble and still fool the Americans and the younger voters. Good job lying Obama. You don’t tale responsibility for your action. You are a disgrace for all North Carolinians and Indianians. What’s new? Obama lied just like Wright, Rezco and Ayers and he will continue to lie and overspent the voter’s money just to win but still the loser.
Richardson suddenly came out at CNN after Hillary won Pennsylvannia. Why are you afraid? Yes you are because f Hilalry wins your personal ambition and interest will disappear. Richardson cannot be trusted and a traitor. Don’t vote for him when runs for a Senator. He belongs to Wright, Rezco and Ayer who join any group or fraternity where he will benefit and not the Americans.
Obama’s motto and theme should be Pay per Vote. Obama overspent in Pennsylvannia and still came out the loser.
Look at the facts as to how strong Hillary is:
Obama lost in Pennsylvannia in spite of endorsement by a Senator and overspending in ads, 5 to 1.
Obama lost in Texas and Ohio even overspending in ads and manipulating info in Ohio.
Obama lost in California even though Oprah, Maria Shriver, and Katherine Kennedy endorsed him.
Obama lost Massachusetts even though Kennedy and John Kerry endorsed him.
Hillary won the big states and has more electoral college votes to date than Obama that is crucial in November.
Obama lost the big states even though the media is most of the time unfair with Hillary and always positive to Obama.
Wake up superdelegates! You will make the right choice if you pick Hillary.
Obama mocked the Pennsylvannians and the entire nation, which is so irresponsible and very degrading to all Americans. He is just like Wright who mocked the Americans and like Rezco and Ayers who we can’t trust.
Before you can have CHANGE, we first need SOLUTIONS and that is HILLARY.
Wake up superdelegates!

Posted by: Alfredo | April 28, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Just some concerns…Is there any rule about a President having dual citizenship and needing to advise voters if they have dual citizenship. Can the president appoint anyone of their endorsers be nominated to a cabinet position or become the president’s spokesperson? Maybe Obama could answer these questions since he studied constitutional law.

Posted by: Jilly | April 28, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

If I were Obama, I would not debate either. It only makes him look bad when he can’t answer the questions. It’s too bad for the voters, because many of the debates have not been televised on many of the local stations. You need cable to see most of the debates.

Posted by: Pell | April 28, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Guys, guys, GUYS!(LOL)
This is all bull. It’s just divisive distractions to make a story to keep us watching their channels and buying the papers etc etc – tabloid manipulation of Americans, Orwell style “NEWSPEAK” stuff. who cares?.. as they say, “MAKE SHOW! MAKE SHOW!” its all a farce, as our elections are compromised.
We really could chooswe to stop caring about “race”, and racists of any color, and start caring about HUMANITY. Then we will unite, and use what god and man have given us: BRAINS to get our ### out of the frying pan and avoid the fire of Global Climate Change, sheesh. this stuff matters so little when we look at the BIG BIG trouble that all of humanity is in at this crucial time.
Love and Peace to you all, my fellow Human Beings.
get excited about WHOMEVER, but get it together to save our future, people! Lets do it for the Kids.

Posted by: LedByG00D | April 28, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Obama is too chicken to debate Clinton again. She mopped the floor with him during the last debate. She is being critized for being tough – well I want a tough president – not some wimp that is too scared to debate. He whined about the questions during the last debate – so she offers him one and one and still too scared…too many debates?
there have been 21 but that was with all canidates for Dem nomination. There have been only 4 with just the 2 of them. If he is running from Clinton now what will he do when the repubs come after him?
He MIGHT win nomination – but will not win General Election – No he can NOT.
He is too unseasoned and comes across as a wimp and an elitist.
Hot air in a suit BUT give him his props – he does give a great speech. I want solutions not speeches.

Posted by: Rose | April 28, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

NEWS FLASH
BILL CLINTON IS NOT RUNNING HILLARY IS
im glad that obama didnt take the debate especially after the last debate when u have bill’s former number one guy george stephonopolis asked obama ridiculous questions and hillary got no hard ones at all if i have to see another fake crying session by hillary or hear another lie about how she learned to shoot even though she has tried countless times to pass legislation against firearms,hmmm kinda sounds odd doesnt it, or what about trieng to pass legislation that will lead to us having troops in iran …I’m from illinois and im white and a obama supporter this election is the most important one in years dont let the color of someones skin or there name come into play of who should lead this nation right now we have a white guy in the command and has put our country in a near recesssion so remember that bill is not running Hillary is

Posted by: keith | April 28, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Obama’s right, We don’t need anymore debates. Debates are for finding out who one is. We have heard enough Obama.
We know who you are.

Posted by: KURT | April 28, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Nancy – They have debated several times. If there was to be another debate, I would prefer that the moderators be Gwen Ifill and Margaret Carlson. These moderators come better prepared and lead better, issue centered discussions than what have been provided the American public. I’m not impressed by set up questions such as: Why is he afraid? That’s just a cheap shot. It’s far more useful to pose a better forum and set of moderators for debate than what has been provided to the public.

Posted by: 63tango | April 28, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I would hate to know to much about a candidate! Especially when it’s only for the President of the United States. I would rather he knock on approx 20 doors throughout the country during the time he could reach millions of people. Really a smart move on his part.

Posted by: jim | April 28, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

He better do SOMETHING to counter the latest Rev. Wright speeches. It is damaging his campaign beyond belief and yet he sits back and waits. I’m afraid this will be his “tactic” in dealing with hostile countries.

Posted by: Gale | April 28, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Barak Obama won’t debate because he will fall short. But if he can’t handle such a debate, then how would he handle real tough issues as President??? He is not confident because he lacks experience and that is the reason why he chose not to debate. He knows up-front he will loose against his opponent… He does not want voters to see him weak again, but the voters want to see who is the stronger candidate to carry their cause. The “Lady” is our “man”!!!!
She is tireless, she is getting into her element – while Barak is losing his spark and energy.

Posted by: Retrovvision | April 28, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Wow, I can’t understand why he doesn’t want to debate and allow the public decide. He now says that he is bored with the process. Um, no thanks.

Posted by: Confused | April 28, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

The Obama campaign better issues a tornado warning. It’s spinning out of control!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: ChrisA | April 28, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Why did he take last Thursday off in Chicago if he wants to spend all of the available time he can speaking to potential voters. This guy lies all the time.
He knows that he cannot out debate Hillary and doesn’t want to appear weaker than a woman.
I hope she wins the nomination! I won’t vote for him.

Posted by: Susan | April 28, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

The way Obama reacts to suggestions from Hillary seems arrogant. He makes it sound as though he is right and what he says is the way it’s going to be, sometimes it sounds as though he is treating her as though she is inferior. Like he’s annoyed. Is that the way he’ll act as president? Is that the way we’ll be treated. I don’t like it.

Posted by: Sue | April 28, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

When Senadors vote “present” is because they don’t agree with the bill and had to be readjusted. Hillary vote YES to some of them and after that She said “Thanks god it wasn’t approved.

Posted by: bos123 | April 28, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I don’t get it why has thisimportant and significant issue been glossed? No one on television has touched this story. It is important to everyone no matter your preference or your allegiance.

Posted by: Dave | April 28, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

It baffles me that Obama should be held responsible for what somebody else that he is not answerable said in the name of a Pastor and Hillary not held accountable for the gaffes of ther husband she has known more than Obama knows this Pastor.Let people say reasons for not liking him and not hiding under the Pastors’s comments.

Posted by: CeeJay | April 29, 2008, 7:05 am 7:05 am

I think Obama COULD reach the voters more efficently and in greater numbers in a short time if he would debate. They should have a town hall meeting combo Lincoln Douglas debate and then be televised….BANG! Voter interaction and instant delivery to the homes of the voters. Obama just doesn’t like the style of debating, it’s too much work and he is not the only star.

Posted by: Darla | April 29, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.