By Nitya

Apr 17, 2008 3:02pm

Obama Attempts to Brush Off Tough Debate

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller Reports: Senator Barack Obama, D-Ill., both literally and figuratively, tried to brush off a rough performance after Wednesday night’s debate on ABC.

During a town hall in Raleigh, Obama said Democratic rival Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., "looked in her element" last night in Philadelphia.

"She was taking every opportunity to get a dig in there, that’s her right to kind of twist the knife a little bit," Obama said before reiterating a point he made during the debate.

"That’s how our politics has been taught to be played. That’s the lesson that she learned when the republicans were doing that same thing to her back in the 1990s, so I understand it, and when you’re running for the presidency then you’ve got to expect it."

Watch the video from the town hall meeting HERE.

Obama then paused, brushed both his shoulders, and then bent down and brushed off his knee amid thunderous applause from the audience.

"That’s what you got to do," Obama laughed, "That is also precisely why I’m running for president to change that kind of politics."

The Illinois senator called the first half of the debate was "tit for tat silliness", and quickly added, "It took us 45 minutes before we even started talking about a single issue that matters to the American people . . . 45 minutes before we heard about healthcare, 45 minutes before we heard about Iraq, 45 minutes before we heard about jobs, 45 minutes before we heard about gas prices."

Obama said that the debate was a preview of how the Republicans will attack him if he were the nominee.

"That was the roll out of the Republicans campaign against me in November. It happened just a little early but that is what they will do. They will try to focus on all these issues that don’t have anything to do with how you are paying you bills at the end of the month," Obama said.

Obama said he knows he will have to respond sharply and crisply to an attack like that, explaining he tried to "show some restraint" because he was debating a Democrat.

"Ill be honest with you –- it’s a little harder to do with a fellow Democrat because you know I’m trying to you know be –- show some restraint. You know, I won’t have this much restraint with the Republicans," he said before continuing, "If the Republicans come at me I will come right back at them."

Obama has not yet committed to a proposed April 27 debate in Raleigh –- while his opponent, Senator Clinton has.

"We’ve now had 21 (debates), and look, I mean the previous three, you know, we did very well, so it’s not as if we don’t know how to do these things."

Obama did say they are trying to work out time in the schedule for either a North Carolina or Indiana debate — as both states hold primaries on May 6.

Addressing an overflow crowd before the event, Obama spoke about the importance of North Carolina, applying more pressure to Clinton in a state he’s expected to fare well in.

"North Carolina is going to be critically important –- if we can win in North Carolina, I think we can wrap up this nomination," he said.

User Comments

Go Obama!!!
Even a Clintonista Attack Squad disguised as a debate won’t help Hillabeans!!!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 17, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Well when they asked him about his remarks he reminds me of one of my children it is always well she did this .Hillary did not go out to San Fran.and tell a well off crowd about the low information voters all the party’s have to deal with . She didn’t sit in a church that has a pastor with a bad message. No fault insurance anyone

Posted by: Bishop | April 17, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Obama can’t “brush off” his continuing inability to answer tough questions about his friendships with nefarious characters like racist Rev. Wright, and Bill “the bomber” Ayers. He also can’t escape his dismal inability to field foreign affairs questions that any presidential candidate should know.
Hillary is, and will remain, the only chance the democrats have to beat the republicans in the G.E.

Posted by: Emily | April 17, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

The debate would have been better if Gibson and Stephanopolous had acted like journalists and not like scandal-sheet editors. They wasted my time and cheapened our political discourse. I’m deeply disappointed in both of them, and in ABC.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Did he sound Presidential last night behind that podium? Absolutely not. Who wants a president that stands up there and has no clue about Economics 101. Don’t get me started about obama telling stories and lying – sounds just like Bush!

Posted by: Jenny | April 17, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

The debate was terrible. ABC News should be ashamed of their effort in this debate. How can you say who won when the debate rarely touched on issues that matter?

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Democratic candidates for Prez refused to debate on FOX thinking that the so called mainsteam media like ABC News is better, huh? Well, people now know that the most powerful forces in media are Drudge Report, FOX News and the tabloid press. They lead and the rest follow. CNN depends on them, as well as NBC News. Some of us who knew this all along are not surprised. The question is, what took the rest of you so long to know the truth. Yeah, liberal bias!

Posted by: LarrySpeakes | April 17, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Sen. Obama continues to take the high road. His response to the disgraceful all-time low media spectacle ABC put on last night is surprisingly moderate. ABC has sunk to the lowest level – masquerading republican smear propaganda of the most ludicrous kind as a “debate”. Clinton and Stefanopoulos were tag teaming and unwittingly helping Disney’s Republican agenda. This whole affair is first and foremost a sign of the complete demise of ABC News. Disney should stick to animation and leave journalism to the professionals!

Posted by: koch | April 17, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Another ABC “reporter” says Obama
“tried to brush off a rough performance”.
A ROUGH PERFORMANCE? aLL THE POLLS SAY HE WON.
ALL OF THEM.

Posted by: SICKOFIT | April 17, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Did anybody review the questions those 2 bozos (Charles and Stephanopoutsos) were asking? What a disgrace to the Network. ABCinquirer debate. 2 thumbs down on Gibson

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Oh PUHleeze. He was going easy on her because she’s a fellow democrat? And they bought that? He’s trying to be restrained. Hilary didn’t ask the questions, she only answered them. He’s the one that when asked a specific question kept trying to slide her name into it, so if snybody was trying to twist a knife it was him. Why does Obama think he can insult someone’s intelligence like that? At one point I thought I’d die laughing when in dscribing one thing or another Obama used very highfalootin language and I thought to myself “that’s pretty elitist English” but I think it went right over the commentators head.

Posted by: druggstohr | April 17, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

The moderators’ performance was disgraceful. What a debasement of the political discourse. If these trivialities bear on larger issues of character, etc., then fine–get to the point. But there are momentous issues facing the country. Get some perspective.

Posted by: Rich | April 17, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

I don’t support or even like Obama, but he is largely correct. ABC News has done a horrific job during of covering this Democratic debate, making everything superficial and gossipy. The debate was just more of the same.
I disagree with Obama in that many of these issues need coverage, he’s never answered on Wright, Ayers, Rezko. But Gibson/Step. spent 45 minutes without getting at anything. (Plus Steph. doesn’t understand causality as his capital gains question shows).

Posted by: JimF | April 17, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Worst Job of Journalism by two clowns, with their tabloid type questions.
This is Network News???? Are these the questions people care about? I think not.

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

THERE IS NO DENYING THE FACT THAT THE MEDIA (REGRETABLY. PERHAPS) HAS THE POWER TO MAKE OR BREAK THIS CAMPAIGN. AS A VETERAN NEWS MAN, MY ADVICE TO ABC IS THAT TRY AND RAISE YOUR STANDARDS. JUDGING FROM THESE COMMENTS, I AM QUITE CONVINCED THAT PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF THE SAME OLD GAME OF MUDDYING THE WATERS, OF CREATING FALSE SENSATIONALISM AT THE COST OF AMERICA’S FURURE AND THE FUTURE OF ITS CITIZENS. PEOPLE DO’NT NEED TO LOOK AT THE CAR CRASH. THEY ARE BETTER THAN THAT.

Posted by: anti gutter press | April 17, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Obama mangled his words again in the debate last night.

Posted by: Dooley Twig | April 17, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

he did not win this one not even close he is also hen pecked .

Posted by: Bishop | April 17, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

I notice that almost all the news media believes Obama was tentative and rattled. Check them out.

Posted by: Aston | April 17, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Obama is the best thing that’s happened to this country in decades. The “debate” if you can call it that was right wing tabloid fiesta done for ratings. ABC should be ashamed.

Posted by: alex rostocki | April 17, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Hey Obama zombies, you had no problem with the media bias against Hillary and laughed when she brought it up. Now how does it feel? You do know what karma is right, or does Obama need to give a speech on that too. What goes around comes around! The honeymoon is over isn’t it. Oh I’m sorry am I treating Obama unfairly should I stick to criticisms that he has prepared for, well just blame Gibson and Stephanopolous. ABC it’s about time that someone asked both the candidates real questions and decided to make the debate reflect the general election.

Posted by: Gonzalo | April 17, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Last nights Debate was the worst.
It was so apparent that George and Gibson were extremely biased and continued to attack Obama. Why would that be allowed.
ABC news is a huge disappointment

Posted by: Tina S | April 17, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

AS A LONG TIME POLITICAL ANALYST I CAN SAFELY SAY THAT it is quite clear that the media wants a protracted Democratic campaign, simply because this means more months of work and of not so news-worthy back and forth between the two Democratic rivals. It is clear from the shift in the media position that the only way to ensure this is by helping Hilary Clinton to win Pennsylvania. The notion of the Democratic contest being a dramatic cliff-hanger is a game of make-believe. The real question is why so many people are playing. The answer has more to do with media psychology than with practical politics. Journalists have become partners with the Clinton campaign in pretending that the contest is closer than it really is. Most coverage breathlessly portrays the race as a down-to-the-wire sprint between two well-matched candidates, one only slightly better situated than the other to win in August at the national convention in Denver. The media are also enamored of the almost mystical ability of the Clintons to work their way out of tight jams, as they have done for 16 years at the national level. That explains why some reporters are inclined to believe the Clinton campaign when it talks about how she’s going to win on the third ballot at the Democratic National Convention in August.

Posted by: maturity | April 17, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

How many delegates Hillary got yesterday by attacking Obama? – Nothing. Did her rate of being the nominee overtake that of Obama? – Not at all. So what all that attacks were for?

Posted by: Peace | April 17, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

He whines to much for my liking…for cripes sakes, this is the big leagues and he is vying for the Presidency of the US..if this is the best he can do with his answers from someone within his own party, and should he get the nomination for our party, then God help us, we are in deep trouble.
He is not ready for prime time and no matter how you cut it, that isn’t going to change. So, pick yourself up, brush yourself off and maybe in another (8) years, you MIGHT be ready for prime time.
A freshman in college on a debating team could have done better…Sorry Barack, you got a D l

Posted by: Mechan8 | April 17, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

You guys are ridicolous. You do realize that Clinton bawled her eyes out in New Hampshire, to end up winning that primary? Dont deny it, she won by 2 points, when down prior. But once she launced the waterworks, the votes came.
You guys got lucky. We could of had a muckfest, and Obama could of hit on Penn, Columbia, the “screw-em” remarks, 100 million dollars, the false Nafta story, your connection with certain Chinese groups, connection with certain members of Chinese military, etc.
But we have the lead, and you lose points whenever you go negative….So thanks for that.

Posted by: Rob | April 17, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Juvenile debate, pompous Charlie, comical Georgie, made for a rediculous facade of a debate. ABC should be ashamed of what their station portrayed as a debate which could affect the future of this country.
Question: How much was paid to Georgie? He should be fired. Free TV? If this is an example of free TV debates, going to Comedy Central would be preferred. Sticking with Cable is the route I will chose to get my political fix.
Shame on ABC, Charlie and Georgie.

Posted by: elliott | April 17, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

I watch, admire, and enjoy Charles Gibson every night, making ABC news my network of choice at 6:30. So what happened that he wasted almost an hour on rehashd triva? And what was the relevance of showing Chelsea Clinton seven times during the overtime evening? This was the worst conducted primary date of all 19 I have watched.

Posted by: Ed Reilly | April 17, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

I love this: “Obama tried to brush off a rough performance after Wednesday night’s debate on ABC.” Nice attempt to take attention off what the rest of the U.S. is saying: That was the worst moderated debate in history. The performance issue wasn’t with Hillary or Barack, it was with ABC. If you are going to ask “controversial” questions, at least spread them out. Obama answered five of such rehashed questions, Hillary got one. Nothing about Penn, or Columbia Trade agreements, or her attacks against Obama. Then a bunch of talk about capital gains taxes, just so Charlie and George could ensure his millions stays protected next year. Nice Republican station ABC is. And listen: Nobody other than Republicans gives a crap about Wright or Rezko or Ayers. Obama’s answers are more than satisfactory on it. We’ve been hearing them for months. Let’s talk about Iraq, the economy, and health care. Or is that a conversation the Republicans/ABC don’t want to have?

Posted by: workmonkey | April 17, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Bishop – Senator Obama did not have to admit that he told a lie, either. Unfortunately, Senator Clinton had to stand up and say, regarding her remarks about Bosnia, that she said something that she “knew not to be true.” Yikes -I’d hate to be in the position of having to defend a candidate who admitted to lying. Oh wait – her last name is Clinton. Looked up in the dictionary, the defenition is “liar”.

Posted by: babs101 | April 17, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Obama’s recent elitist comments are fair game in a debate–especially when they came from a man who’s stock-in-trade is his effective speaking abilities. Brushing off his past comments spoken at a time and place when he thought they wouldn’t be repeated back in PA, won’t help him win in Pennsylvania or nationally.

Posted by: Tom B | April 17, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

I want to commend ABC News on the excellent debate last night. This is one of the best to date because tough questions were asked. These were questions I think that the public wanted to be asked so we can learn more about the candidates.

Posted by: janette | April 17, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

“Journalists” Gibson and Stephanopoulos have falled below Geraldo Rivera to about the same level as Perez Hilton. But since ratings are up, I’m sure neither one cares.

Posted by: alberto | April 17, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

ABC should hang its head low for this one. I thought I was watching Fox News! Disgusting BS. I wish Peter Jennings were still alive, he was a class act!

Posted by: MATTHEW | April 17, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Sandy
Bet you make that judgment based on Obama’s inability to retain his composure. Now be honest, exactly what questions were more pointed for Obama than for Clinton. Or, isn’t Obama just not used to explain his questionable background. When an eloquent speaker stammers and stutters, it’s because he’s embarrassed to participate in the discussion.

Posted by: Aston | April 17, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Stephanopoulos and Gibson ought to be ashamed at the inane level of their questions. So often it is the press that lowers the level of public debate. Our democracy will not long be sustainable with this behavior of our press which has a public duty to enlighten so that democracy can thrive.

Posted by: Harold Goldstein | April 17, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Shame on you ABC. That was not a debate. It was an ambush!!How come questions weren’t asked about Nafta and
Hilary’s advisor’s role in the CC Columbian trade deal? I thought I was watching Fox News!!!

Posted by: hilma | April 17, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Hillary’s past will continue to be thrown in her face for years to come, no matter what she has done, she has been called out for things that happened years before she ever became the first lady, and Obama cries when he is asked tough questons? Neither one in my book is fit to run this country, they are both liars as far as I am concerned, and McCain is not a much better choice. The debate last night did nothing for me as far as having to pick a suitable President.

Posted by: tiredofpolitics | April 17, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

the first thing I did after watching the debate was cancel abc nightly news on my tivo.
Who lit chelsea clinton and directed the camera to cut to her all night? Someone preparing for a dynasty? And apart from the rehash of old controversies Obama has proven he’s past, the barbed questions thrown only at him- one after the other, without letting him answer– and the softball lobbed “You told a story about bosnia– how can I get your vote back??” please!! I have never seen such biased MSM coverage in my life. And such disrespect towards a candidate. She had less time because they were on the attack, and doing her campaign’s work, as well as McCain’s and Karl Rove’s, I hope the American public prove more intelligent than their so-called journalists on ABC. I think they will, and show out of touch the Clinton’s and their surrogates on ABC via Fox news were last night. I have never been more demoralized in my life.

Posted by: lynda obst | April 17, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

WORST DEBATE EVER. SHAME ON ABC.

Posted by: ADAM | April 17, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I can’t believe that a major news organization delivered what they did to the American people last night and we are not outraged? How did a lapel pin question and answer going to help me when I have to take my son to the Doctor next week without insurance? I am so sick of all this petty garbage when people like me get up everyday and cringe at the difficult times we are experiencing. My issues are REAL, what we saw last night was soap opera drama.

Posted by: nerakami | April 17, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Where were all these people who now criticize ABC news when NBC, CNBC and CNN were acting as a mouthpiece for Obama on a daily basis. Chris Matthews puts on a Sunday morning show on NBC and has not put on one dissenting journalist for over three months now. That show looks more like an Obama infomercial.

Posted by: beo | April 17, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Up until last night I was a die-hard ABC News fan. I watch GMA every morning, and Charlie Gibson every evening. No more. Last night was pure tabloid media. Why not give the candidates the opportunity to debate the issues important to the voters? Will ANOTHER explanation for Rev. Wright’s sermons keep your home out of foreclosure? Will asking for an explanation of HRC’s Bosnia remarks (again)keep your gas tank full? I am tired of the political garbage, and disappointed in ABC News is promoting it. I guess it is CNN here on out.

Posted by: Shell | April 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Thank you so much ABC! Finally, Mr. Obama is being questioned by people who are not under his cultlike spell. I’m as yet undecided so it was very important to me that someone, a real journalist not an Obama worshiper, try to get some real answers from this man. I found his answers in the latter half of the debate to be vague and unrealistic. And contrary to this “real American” I was interested in the beginning of the debate. During that half of the debate he alternated between petulant child and double talking politician. Kudos to Charlie Gibson for stepping into Mike Wallace’s shoes!!!

Posted by: Lee | April 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

As a white university professor, I, along with my children and grandchildren, am honored and privileged to be part of this great history in the making and vote for Sen. Obama. Now, will America rise to the occasion and embrace this great change and truly unite, showing the world that ONLY in America this can happen, and that it really is the land of the free? Or, will those whose better judgement is clouded by petty prejudices and misconceptions continue the divisive tradition of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’, propagated by the media and by those politicians who firmly believe in their politics of divide and rule and public deception?

Posted by: Hopeful | April 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

The debate moderators were absolutely the worst I have ever seen in 40 years of watching debates. A complete disgrace! Perhaps they could both move on to a tabloid news show rather than presenting tabloid news as a substitute for real news and important issues that matter to us all. Is Stephanopolous still working for Bill Clinton? Shawn Hannity? Or, are both he and Gibson just completely incompetent? Amazing!

Posted by: R.C. Fillmore | April 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

The questions asked by Charles and George were poor. They should have focused far more on the economy, healthcare and Iraq.

Posted by: Gary | April 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

That “debate” last night was a total, complete waste of my time. It was not a debate of any kind at all. Just a facade to try to provoke reactions between the 2 leading Democratic candidates. Gibson and Stephanopolis should be ashamed of themselves to think that was any kind of legitimate debate. It isn’t any wonder why ABC is not one of my fevorite networks anymore. I do not plan to spend my time in the future when anything is presented by ABC. I have other things to do. You should really be apologizing to the American public!

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

ABC, You have made a mockery of journalism. Good bye.

Posted by: brian | April 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

If I was choosing a debate team, I wouldn’t pick Obama.

Posted by: Mack | April 17, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Ah come on, ABC…
It was a debacle and your spinning is as clunky as a 1962 Whirpool.

Posted by: Kris | April 17, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

If this is a debate, by God, the kids in my child’s school could have done a better job with the questions. ABC might as well just had clinton asking the questions. it was not a debate it was again the clinton biased media asking the same stuff, on rev wright, the comments (clinton herself has made back in 90s) and NOT at thing on her lies, bosnia, nafta canada, mexico, or colombia, the girl who died who per clinton had no “insurance,” Bill’s lies to cover her lies, etc..
Oh dear, if this is called debate, I truely fear for our future…….. ABC:
Advocacy for Billarys Clinton inc.

Posted by: angelina005 | April 17, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

I’m a Clinton supporter and even I thought that debate was a sham. Terrible, if anything they just mobilized a more voracious group of supporters for Obama. Good job ABC!

Posted by: Hope | April 17, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

It probably didn’t matter anyway. Pennsylvanians were too busy brushing up on the immigration issue to have time for the debate.

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Mr. George Stephanopoulos,
Are you still on the Clinton payroll?

Posted by: Jerome in Michigan | April 17, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Obama’s followers are not doing their candidate any favors – they’re just showing their lack of ability to handle any criticism of their candidate….just like Obama and his campaign. It’s about time he’s hit with some serious questions – what the Obama followers are REALLY pissed about is he DID NOT handle answering these questions well – he rambled, he was unconvincing and came off defensive. He’s shown that he’s not ready for the election – can’t handle the heat. The Repubs would eat him up.

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

All flash, no pan. All hype, no substance. Vapid rhetoric forces the chickens to come home and roost. I want a president who is more than something in a quantum physics formula.

Posted by: Terry | April 17, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

I do not understand how George Stephanopoulos can be allowed to moderate a debate when he is a former employee of one candidates husband. ??? Earth to ABC buy a clue! It is clear every Sunday that Stephanopoulos is biased against Senator Obama. Charlie Wilson who I like was just awful, the attempt to look profesorial with those glasses propped on his nose made him look like he was auditioning for Paper Chase 2008! The lady who chose to use her 15 minutes of fame to ask about the wearing of a flag pin. PLEEZE, PLEEZE, PLEEZE America wake up Rome is burning!

Posted by: MOTWNGRL | April 17, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Last night’s debate was a waste of time. The moderator’s were nothing more than tabloid journalists.

Posted by: Vandell | April 17, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

I am fumed over last nights debate and the petty, small minded questioning of charles gibson and the shrimp. previously i have always admired charles for his manner, (seeming) intelligence and character. last night he wasted it all, down the drain, kaput. I was shocked and embarrassed. I had asked my two teenage children to watch, specifically because charles was the moderator. now my kids question what i could have possibly been thinking. they’re not dummy’s. i sure felt like one. abc is officially off my watch list.

Posted by: mikepercival | April 17, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Ms. Susan Jacoby commented that Bush and Co. “pulverized” the wall of separation between “church and state.”
Last night Mr. Gibson, Mr. Stephanopolis, Sen. Clinton, and to a lesser extent Sen. Obama created a whirlwind that totally obliterated that “wall.”
They proved what I long suspected: this is a nation for the rich, by the rich, and of the rich.

Posted by: J W Alsip | April 17, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

I have been a regular viewer of This Week with George Stephanopolous. I want to thank him for his hideous performance last night. For now on, I will have another hour with my family on Sundays!

Posted by: Ben in Colorado | April 17, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

We are not worthy.
We are not worthy.
He is The One.
The Obamessiah has arrived.
gag…

Posted by: L | April 17, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

I was so disappointed in the dabate last night. I expect so much more from Gibson and Stephanoplous. You wasted almost an hour of my time mired in the muck of the campaign rather than talking about things that matter to Americans like me and my friends. Sen. Obama is right–things have to change. The first 45 minutes WAS just silliness! However, I could tell Sen. Clinton was loving it. I was so bored and disappointed that I turned it off 50 minutes into it.
You guys can do better than this!

Posted by: Kathy G. | April 17, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Look at the polls!!!! Overall view is that OBAMA CLEARLY WON against THREE juvenile, snotty-nosed opponents. Get real ABC. You are a joke.

Posted by: MMA in PA | April 17, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Last night was a total joke. Charlie and George spent almost an hour questioning Sen. Obama about STUPID NON-ISSUES. What happened to Policy? Sen. Clinton is the one who outright lied right? Her character is what I question. I am going to vote for Sen. Obama now. Last night showed me just how low the Clinton Machine will go. I wonder how much they paid Charlie and George for that witch hunt. It is really sad that she has to stup to such a low level. No wonder she is behind in delegates and total votes. She is not fit to be President. She is just a liar with no substance. I am not buying it for one second!! ABC needs to rethink how it wants to be perceived because that (“debate”)was nothing more than a tabloid show last night.

Posted by: Erik Holston | April 17, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

ABC stands for “A lot of Bull Crap. That’s exactly what the moderators were shoveling at Clinton and Obama. I’ll NEVER watch another debate on ABC again. Charlie and George were simply terrible. ABC is history in our house. I’ve blocked it.

Posted by: Wait a minute | April 17, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Hillary knows that when a small town American is not happy with the government, they don’t go to church and shoot up the town. Obama really mangled this statement.

Posted by: Dooley Twig | April 17, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

The question isn’t can Obama brush off the outcome of the debate. The question is, “Can ABC ever recover its credibility as a news organization as the result of hosting an evening with the National Inquirer’s Editorial Board”?
Regardless of who one chooses to support in this contest, ABC News insulted your intelligence last night.
A vast majority of Americans believe that the country is on the wrong track. Critical issues abound. There is no shortage of substance to discuss and debate.
Last night’s efforts took the nation nowhere and enlightened no one.
There is no rational defense for what ABC News did last night. Absolutely none.

Posted by: pjb | April 17, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

This is the first time in my life I am ahamed of the democratic party. If all of the questions were geared to Hillary, this would not be an issue. It is about judgement, all questions asked of Obama and Clinton last night were justified. This just further proves those who do not kiss Obama’s butt are against him. Shame on the 1/2 of the democratic party who thinks Obama walks on water.

Posted by: liz | April 17, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

It was shameful for George Stephanopolous to have spent valuable air time to give such importance to a clip of someone asking why someone does or does not wear a flag pin. Is George that shallow to suggest that the wearing or non-wearing of a pin is a measure of loyalty and patriotism? I am reminded of the number of courageous Dutch during the Nazi occupation who chose to wear a yellow star to neutralize the stigma to Jews who were forced to wear the yellow star. Perhaps we should all wear the flag pin to neutralize the right-wing attempt to define themselves as more patriotic because they wear the flag pin, and some others do not. Shame on you George!!

Posted by: Harriold | April 17, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

ABC, Gibson, Stephanopolos should be ashamed of themselves for that debate. The moderators were trying so hard to “get Obama!” on flag lapel pin and a bunch of other pathetic right wing talking-point garbage that has NOTHING to do with the lives and struggles of everyday American voters. Obama can brush it off as a candidate, but I can’t brush off the feeling that it’s really us, the voters, who got disrespected once again last night. Shame.

Posted by: pbd | April 17, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Everyone is commenting on how much Sen. Obama stammered and stuttered during the debates,and looked unsure or caught off guard, I for one think that he did an awesome job considering every word that comes from his mouth is dissected and dismantled to fit Hillbilly’s agenda to discredit him. He had better think before he opens his mouth since everything he says is charged directly to his heart and not as a mistake.

Posted by: WAV | April 17, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Hillary was quick with her answers and very focused, very presidential. Obama struggled. Go Hillary!

Posted by: andrea benini | April 17, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos are buffoons. The only thing I learned last last night is that neither one of them should be called a journalist. With so many problems facing this country, it’s amazing they took so much time dwelling on the trivial. Thanks for the worst debate in history. This was probably the lowest point in network news history, but at least the debate reaffirms why I never watch Charlie Gibson’s newscast. Pathetic!

Posted by: Tom | April 17, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Why can’t all we Democrats just get along? We need to win. I love Clinton and Bill especially. But i love Obama more. We can work something out. We have to.

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Maybe Senator Obama can’t brush off last night’s debate, but I can brush off ABC. YES I CAN !!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: 717judie | April 17, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

ABC should be ashamed of themselves for last night’s travesty. George and Charlie, you can NOT call yourselves “journalists”.

Posted by: Kathleen | April 17, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

So where are those prominent Pennsylvanian Clinton backers who were going to switch sides today???
They seem to have gone theway of the 50 superdelegates who were going ot endorse obama after Texas.
AWOL.

Posted by: s.b. | April 17, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Wow.. I’m impressed. So many people backing Obama. So few backing Clinton. Some excusing horrible performances as the bad ABC for asking questions that drove to the heart of personal qualifications and didn’t repeat the same-ol’ party line. Interesting response. Obama’s responses showed his dedication to change. Change the topic at every opportunity. He showed one clear thing: he doesn’t do well under pressure and without a script he’s a hallow candidate. CHANGE! Oh yes. Change the topic. Don’t talk about his qualifications. Don’t talk about his associations. Don’t talk about things that question his fitness. Pathetic people. This is just pathetic.

Posted by: Interested Litigant | April 17, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

The ones who really had the worst performance were the moderators. I was disgusted by the pathetic questions to both candidates. They just vomited up the same insignificant issues we are all sick of hearing about instead of asking questions that would give us real insight into the candidates. Fortunately we can get that from other sources. ABC took part in the dumbing down of America that seems to be the major networks’ mission these days. Disgusting.

Posted by: Alison | April 17, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

An indication of what happens when you can’t use a tele prompter!
In the previous 21 debates the attack was directed at Hillary and OB was asked whether he wants a pillow to be comfortable. Now when the show is on the other foot, every single OB supporter is crying foul and wants to boycott ABC. If OB is so clean, why didn’t he stand up like man and answer the questions. Instead, OB blamed politics as usual, his opponent, the media and everyone asking him questions. This is the man promising change by working across the aisle. Have news for you OB, there will be opposition and there will be people in your own party that will oppose your agenda of the President. Being irritated and uncomfortable is not going to get you anywhere. Just in case you don’t know, United States is democracy and everyone will not agree with you at any time.
How are you going to anything done being irritated without the ability to answer tough questions. You can’t vote present as in Illinois Senate. You can’t tell the public it is politics as usual in Washington DC. You cannot tell it is the medias fault. You will have to stand up and deliver. Then again you wouldn’t know that would you? Your greatest accomplishment in your resume is registering voters as a community organizer.

Posted by: Independent | April 17, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

The type of questions asked during the first 45 minutes of the debate were unnecessary. What a waste of time asking questions about MESS that we have been hearing about before. I want to hear about issues such as POVERTY, HEALTH CARE, EDUCATION, THE ECONOMY, not about Bosnia, not about Rev. Wright, not about the word Bitter. The debate that ABC hosted was a bunch of Bull.

Posted by: Greensboro, NC | April 17, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Why is this ‘blog’ in the top headlines with the rest of the ‘news?’

Posted by: Gina | April 17, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

I just hope this overflow crowd will open their eyes and see what kind of a person this man really is before it’s too late for our country and our world.

Posted by: P Graber | April 17, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Guilt by association has its limits and ABC doesn’t seem to know them. If so called major news organizations, or more accurately entertainment news organizations focus on Obama, Clinton and McCain associations then they must do the hard journalistic work of relating these associations to some policies or substantive actions of the candidates. Otherwise its more distraction than information. And it is this hard work that distinguishes the journalist from the commentator. Last night ABC’s decisions on what questions should be asked reflected this fundamental failure.
In order for a healthy domocracy to work the press must have a balance between its informative or journalistic function and commentary. ABC failed to strike a proper balance. And to the extent it failed the public was the loser. American has already had a President elected in part because of a failure of the media to do its job. Emphaising tours of flag factories, swift boat vets, etc. At this critical time we don’t need another one. The Womens League of Voters would do a much better job.

Posted by: McHenry | April 17, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Why is NOBODY (moderators or candidates) talking about illegal immigration?!?!??

Posted by: Phil | April 17, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

liz
We Democrats have to stick together. Who else is going to look out for us? McCain?

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

That so-called “debate” was a complete and total disgrace. ABC should be completely ashamed to have aired such a slanted piece of garbage. Anyone who questions the candidates’ abilities to answer the “big questions” or speak out of the “big issues” after watching that drivel must be on crack. There were no issues! An hour of commercial-laced, kicking-a-long-dead-horse questions from a Clinton staffer and croney-at-arms, followed by another hour of useless and shameful baiting. What the hell was that?? ABC News should be embarrassed at such an unprofessional production.

Posted by: Ric Shaw | April 17, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

When for the first time the table was turned on Obama, look at the result. The far-left media surrogates pounced on poor ABC coordinators. It took Obama probably 30 minutes to talk about nothing except what happened last night in debate in NC and rail against Washington which he is a part of. How about saying something substantive in the first 30 minutes instead of theatrics remiscent of Jeremiah Wright!

Posted by: mark | April 17, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I was disappointed in the performance of the moderators. Yes, both candidates could better explain choice of words or relationships maintained and the like. Yes, too much talk of hope and more needed on plans and solutions and experience. But did we need 45 minutes?
I would have enjoyed a more detailed discussion about the economy, national debt, rebuilding our infrastructure, education, energy independence, health care, social security, foreign policy, rebuilding/retooling/re-energizing our armed forces, child care, environmental protection standards, safety of our food/water, national health promotion incentives, obesity epedimic, to name a few…

Posted by: Allen | April 17, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

What a sham. A truly disgusting debate. I’m not talking about the candidates…just the moderators and the ABC network. You did little if nothing to enlighten or inform the electorate. You were biased in your questioning, displaying a right wing tabloid mentality. ABC, you have just lost this viewer.

Posted by: William Krause | April 17, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

It did look as if George and Charlie were handed the questions by Howard Wolfson prior to the start of the debate. It’s a shame that what had once been the home of Ted Koppell is reduced to the home base of a former Clinton staffer and an old man who thinks wearing your glasses like Ben Franklin makes you sound like him. Two in-the-tank hacks trying to help Hillary to the nomination. Based on the polls, it seems the majority of the public judged it to be the sham spectacle it was.

Posted by: Lorenzo Carcaterra | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I love the elitists who whine over the debate. What ads do you think the Republicans will run? Those who think “Wanting change will make change appear” may need to re-think it. Our system, the one in place doesn’t work that way. You folks are busy stirring your cappuccino at Starbucks while the rest of the country is drinking coffee. Elitist cry about these meaningless things while more important matters are skipped over like how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? The flag in the lapel, the hand over the heart during the national anthem and your preacher shouting out “God Damn America” is what plays in middle America and we are the ones voting. Heck, we even read these meaningless blogs. Call it shallow or useless or anything you want. That Obama and the super delegates don’t get it, means there is more he and they aren’t getting. The democrats may sadly have a weak nominee because the elite take the high road and leave the rest of the country behind. More coffee…

Posted by: AmazonTraveler | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Were you TRYING to make Hillary Clinton look bad? Obama’s whole narrative in this campaign has been to call her an attack dog – and you just spent an hour it look like she was.
Shame on you.

Posted by: Jane | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

ABC should be not only down in their ratings after this debate–they should on the air apologize for their dismal performance in the debate last night. I jhave read all the comments against ABC’s coverage and I agree. George S. should be fired and Charlie G. off the air as well. I am so depressed at this state of affairs.
What a disservice to your audience, ABC.

Posted by: Marsha Conn | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

P Graber
Bush them shoulders off bro. Just chill. It will all be okay. God is good.

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I watch the so called debate and was highly disappointed by the lack of time spent on the problems facing America. I felt that the two so called jounalists were so soft on clinton. Why not delve into bill clinton’s pardon of the weatherground, especially since the so called journalist wanted to wallow in the mud.

Posted by: george | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Anyone who wants to know a candidates position, can go to their web site. If people can take the time to come on here and complain, then they should go to the website and see where the candidates stand. This debate was about character, electability and issues. Obama has had alot of press lately about his associations and his bitter comment. These are questions he will have to answer if he gets to the General Eleciton. Charlie and George were asking questions about things that are on peoples minds. They then covered health care, the economy, the war, raising taxes. I think the Obama supporters have been so busy watching stations like CNN and MSNBC that have been so bias for Obama, that they thought he would get another pass during this debate, which didn’t happen. He finally was asked the hard questions and he must of thought he would get a pass also because he didn’t seem prepared.

Posted by: Annie | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Bad, bad, bad moderating.
What dumb, juvenile questions they asked!

Posted by: JG | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Just to be clear, I am in favor of media going after Obama, that is fine and is great part of the vetting process, but only when it is about issues that matter to the country. Flag pins don’t mean a damn, the bitterness gaff comment doen not mean a damn, Rev Wright story was studied and analyzed for weeks, where is the beef in the debate. Attack his position until the cows come home if you like even if it is unfairly. But to make insinuations through false questions Like this weather underground guy and hope you make a headline .. is pathetic

Posted by: Jan E | April 17, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

After watching the latest debate on ABC last night – I have to ask- what were they thinking? That was a complete embarrassment for the news media particularly that of ABC. After a seven week void that gave opportunity to post substantive questions, the first half of the commercial ridden debate was plagued with questions direct from the tabloids – old news, and no news and non relevant issues from wearing a flag pin to knowing someone who committed a crime 40 years ago. None of these are debatable issues on the mind of voters or will help move this country forward in any way. This is the kind of focus that turns people off politics. I was completely disappointed that what could have been the last debate in this process ended up the way it did.

Posted by: KH | April 17, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

I’m a McCain supporter. However, I think the debate conducted by both Charles and George did the PA. voters a complete disservice. I expected controversial topics to be discussed on both candidates but what was not expected was a 45 minute one-sided attach machine on Obama. I think if the controversial topics are going to be discussed, there should have been a fair and balanced analysis. Example: Where was any questioning on the Mark Penn conflict of interest fiasco towards Hillary?… This was an extreme example of clearly tilted bias towards Obama by ABC… That is not what the voting people of PA. was expecting and certain voting Americans in general….

Posted by: Anita | April 17, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

MMA in PA
Come on — stop generalizing. Even the Washington Post gives Obama poor performance marks. Check out any media page and come back and tell us that ‘everyone knows’ that Obama won the debate. And stop whining. You’re embarrassing your mother.

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Gibson and George moderators was not of professional moderators. they were more like editors of an enquiree paper.
so unprofessional and not of no substance the worst debate I have seen. they acted
like agitators and I believe it was a disappointment to the American people. They heard about Rev Wright,Bosnia, so
what!

Posted by: Shirley | April 17, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

With all of the problems in the US and around the world I really think Charles and George did a disservice to the American people with their questions. Wake up media. Talk about the real issues

Posted by: Jane Mantini | April 17, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

With all of the problems in the US and around the world I really think Charles and George did a disservice to the American people with their questions. Wake up media. Talk about the real issues

Posted by: Jane Mantini | April 17, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Obama clearly tanked last night and all the Obama supporters including some in the media are freaking out. How dare ABC ask Obama tough questions? If this is how he acts when going gets rough then he is not a Presidential material.

Posted by: satish | April 17, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Hillary is desperate. She could care less about what anyone thinks. All she cares about is money and fame. There are a lot more skeletons in her closet because she is so much older and enteched in politicking. Another thing I hate is whether it’s Hillary or any politician they can’t seem to tell the difference between what a misstatement and a lie is. She obviously lied about Bosnia. What else will she embellish? There is only one person so far that even closely comes to telling the truth and that is Obama. Face it folks she is desperate and can not stand losing. One other point……..if she is so tired and it takes her 30 min to get ready what happens at 3 am? What misstatement will come out ……….not to mention it will take her at least 30 min to have a press conference. (It took Pres. Bush 7 min to respond to his 3 am call and it was the middle of the afternoon.)

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I think Obama was successful at proving his unelectability last night. Too bad this didn’t happen at the beginning of the primaries.

Posted by: Mack | April 17, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I rescheduled my evening to watch the big political debate on ABC. I sat down waiting for well thought out questions, but they never came.
The debate started with reruns of false Internet rumors and the same old stuff about Obama’s lapel pin or church. Hillary had to admit she lied about Bosnia even though anyone with an IQ over 50 would already know that.
What very poor questions for a debate. What a waste of airtime and my evening!

Posted by: FT1000 | April 17, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

It’s the smoke and mirrors answer. The real question is where’s your proof, what are your accomplishments…. his answer is “I will change the divisive culture of Washington”… it’s like asking for the time and answering that it’s a beautiful day.

Posted by: smartprimate | April 17, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Did, perchance anyone look at the viewer polls this morning? ABC, NBC and YES, even FOX had Obama as the winner, though it was pretty close on FOX.

Posted by: Sara | April 17, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

ABC News, Gibson, and Stephanopoulos should be ashamed of themselves for abandoning every priciple of common sense and journalism to drag the presidential campaign down into tabloid muck at this pathetic “debate.”

Posted by: David | April 17, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Finally ABC did a fair job, which CNN and MSNBC have not been doing. Obama cannot just “hope”, “play nice”, “unify”. There’s a lot of things wrong with our country for an inexperience candidate to play second-guessing.

Posted by: digita | April 17, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

ABC showed just how irrelevant it is in competing with the quality of a CNN or an MSNBC. It was a poorly produced, poorly executed exercise in trivia…fitting for the network that brings us the pablum that is “Good Morning America.” Obama will be fine. America is waking up to this nonsense.

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Obama’s free ride is over. FINALLY! ABC News should be congratulated for being the first debate to actually both candidates good questions. Obama folded like a cheap tent under the pressure and Hillary stood proud and strong.
Well done, George and Charlie. I respect you both for having the guts to be fair unlike corrupt NBC/MSNBC.

Posted by: Melanie | April 17, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

ABC showed just how irrelevant it is in competing with the quality of a CNN or an MSNBC. It was a poorly produced, poorly executed exercise in trivia…fitting for the network that brings us the pablum that is “Good Morning America.” Obama will be fine. America is waking up to this nonsense.

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

The flag question was meaningless? SO why did Obama tell a bold faced LIE when he re-responded to it?

Posted by: geevill | April 17, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

I quit …this sucks and does no good to participate in… at least until the baby boomers take their selfishness to the grave… my grandmother’s generation made a lot of mistakes but at least they made sacrifices during WW2 and the Depression and believed in more than ME ME ME ME.

Posted by: cm grigg | April 17, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I think Charlie and George did an excellent job of confronting the candidates and asking them to respond to what has been all over the media for weeks. I was pleasantly surprised. Both candidates have spent a great deal of time choosing euphemisms to explain away their actions, spin things, and re-direct attention. How about a refreshing “I lied”. Perhaps if either candidate had spent a significant amount of time in the past outlining specific strategies for addressing the economic challenges we are facing (or anything else for that) then perhaps there could have been a worthwhile debate. Again, good job Charlie & George, too bad you did not have better “Debaters” to work with.

Posted by: E. Greene | April 17, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Hillary had a perfect command of the issues as usual. Obama mangled his words a lot.

Posted by: Dooley Twig | April 17, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Charlie Gibson reminded me (yet again) why I watch Brian Williams every night and NOT him. Who cares about flag lapel pins when people are losing their houses; gas prices and food prices are skyrocking and our military men and women are dying in Iraq!!! ABC – you lost me for good now.

Posted by: Gitana | April 17, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I was appalled by the questions asked by Gibson and Stephanopoulos in last night’s embarrassing “debate”. The first hour was a complete waste of time, with tabloid Fox News-style questions mainly designed to Obama on the defensive. Why doesn’t Obama wear a flag pin? My god, this has been keeping me awake every night for year! What insanity!! Talk about OUT OF TOUCH!! I waited…and waited…for estions concerning healthcare, jobs, the environment, China, the credit crisis, our infrasture!
The Stephanopoulos and Gibson were no better than Bill O’Reilly or Sean Hannity last night! People take note – THIS IS WHAT HAS BECOME OF OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA – IT’S WORSE THAN WE EVER THOUGHT!

Posted by: Alan | April 17, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

For once the Darling of the media was not spoonfed softballs.He stammered his way through most of the debate , hogging up time (Charlie was alert and noted the imbalance in time).Now whine whiine.Wonder what the dear boy will do,if he is nominated when Rovian tactics are slammed against him?

Posted by: I YAM | April 17, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I am a Clinton supporter. After this debate, I’m seriously thinking about switching over to the Obama camp. This was the worst debate I’ve seen in my life and to see that Hillary Clinton actually enjoyed those types of attacks on a fellow democrat really lowers my opinion of her.

Posted by: Ryan | April 17, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Ever since Tim Russert (from that ego-strutting network) took it upon himself to be the deliverer of “makin’ it right again” by demanding Barack Obama’s head (and testicles) on a plate, Charles Gibson and George (“Barack, do you get your ‘cool’ because you’re a black man?”) Stephanopoulos sent in their back comic-page application for their journalistic decoder rings, and took a swipe at Obama themselves. Do you THINK that his BLOOD looks any darker, travels any faster than yours? You allowed Hillary to “get by” on her Bosnia comment, but you want Barack to DENY EVERY PERSON IN HIS LIFE just so you can have your pound of flesh? Hillary is about a step away from attempting to sing the spiritual “Ah Been ‘Buked” (her reference to her ‘baggage’, and everyone going through it), and that won’t bring her any closer to a Black woman; in fact, putting Maggie Smith (her former chief-of-staff while the Clintons were in the White House) on her campaign was a convienent way to make sure Maggie wouldn’t talk. It doesn’t matter for whom I decide to vote -after last night’s idea of a debate, I’ve seen and heard enough.

Posted by: Nia | April 17, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Dooley Twig
Where did you get the idea for that name?

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

The debate last night was a joke. I expected to hear about issues, but had to wait at least 50 minutes in before the disgraceful commentators decided to briefly touch on the issues after an hour of tabloid tv. Shame on you ABC news. George S. bias was very evident in his pouding away at Obama as his loyalties are still with the Clintons. Well he could forget about that job because the Clintons are never getting back into the white house.

Posted by: J. Dima | April 17, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I thought stephonopulos and gibson was better then that but i guss i was wrong, and i think they should be let go from abc! I see a lot of people that i once respected real self comeing out.I would like to know what are they all so sceard of. It was the worst debate that I have ever seen in my 57 years of life matter of fact I could not even watch it all stephonopulos and gibson should be ashamed of themslevs that they would ask such questions that had nothing to do with how we are goning to get out of this war, or how are people goning to keep their houses, or buy food and gas, or how are they goning to get a job but i guss since they havent lost a love one in the war or havent lost their jobs, so iam sure they havent lost their houses yet, but i wonder what qustions they would have ask if one of these things had happen to them

Posted by: Pat | April 17, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I can’t believe how ‘bitter’ you Obama people sound. Your guy got his clock cleaned and it is not ABC’s fault but his own. His poor judgment by having friends like Rev. Wright is not going to go away and will only get worse if he gets the Nom. Stop your whining – you still have MSNBC/NBC and CNN in the tank for Obama.

Posted by: Mel | April 17, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I think ABC did a good job last night. Obama has to face fact that he has to answer the tought questions if he wants to be the president. He couldn’t even explain well about the tax and economy.

Posted by: stephanie | April 17, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Jan E
It’s Obama’s own fault. He glossed over and ran away from these issues in the past and it was altogether appropriate that his foot be held to the fire. Every time he’s questioned, he goes into the attack mode and only addresses the issue when pressed to the extent that it becomes a national event.
And this is a uniter who is advocating a different kind of Washington?

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

WHAT A HORRIBLE DEABATE LAST NIGHT!!!! ABC should be ashamed. I learned absolutley nothing of substance about the candidates. I felt like a was watching tabloid TV. What a waste of time.

Posted by: Va John | April 17, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

I turned the channel to the baseball game shortly into this joke of a “debate” … the tone was more akin to a TV tabloid show than a major news network. Oh, right, it was ABC…

Posted by: Miles | April 17, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

We have an endless war, a sinking economy, a deteriorating environment and a country hopelessly in hock to its enemies and rivals. The country desperately needs leadership. Yet Gibson and Stephanopolous can serve up nothing better than moronic and vacuous questions to prospective candidates for that leadership. It’s disgraceful and disgusting.

Posted by: merne111 | April 17, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

The performance of the moderators was the worst thing about the debate.
If the people want to make this coming election like the previous elections about John Kerry’s purple hearts and G.W national guard duty then congratulations for all us for this terrible democracy.

Posted by: Shorman | April 17, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

May be a bias for one candidate or the other, hard to tell and who really cares? More importantly, the questions were absolutely inane, useless, and stupid .. what an absolute waste of the candidates’ and the viewers’ time. I thought the commercials were the best part. Charles Gibson is clearly out of his element. I guess he wears those specks as he does to look more thoughtful and distinguished. It’s not working. As for George Stephanopolous, never realized he was such an incompetent moron.
The main media bias I see is a corporate one. Also, a general theme of going very easy on McCain. Will be interesting to see how long that lasts.
The media bias seems to me to be dwarfed by utter incompetence and laziness on the part of the anchormen and women, reporters, interviewers, etc. Pathetic and incompetent, doing our country no good at all.

Posted by: PB | April 17, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

AmazonTraveler “The flag in the lapel, the hand over the heart during the national anthem and your preacher shouting out “God Damn America” is what plays in middle America and we are the ones voting. ”
So that is what you are voting on .. I cannot top what you said. So you are taking responsibility for all the crap we are in now form the GWB administration? and you want us to agree with you …AGAIN??

Posted by: Jan E | April 17, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Some of us think Obama being in that hate church for 20 years is AN ISSUE! If you don’t know where these two stand on issues by now, you haven’t been paying attention. I wanted to hear Obama explain himself and he couldn’t to my satisfaction. I’m with Hillary or McCain if she loses. I don’t know this guy well enough.

Posted by: MSG | April 17, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I just never thought that it could happen on ABC. However, I saw and heard with my own eyes and ears. I had a lot of respect for Charlie Gibson. Not so much for George S. I now have no respect for either. I am surprised that a Senior News Leader like Gibson stooped so low during last night’s debate. I don’t know how ABC is going to overcome this one. I am not going to watch the ABC Nightly News, any more. I trusted Gibson. Last night’s debate was a waste of time, for the most part. It focused on nonrelevant issues that have nothing to do with the economy or healthcare. It looked like the old political games were trying to be forced as norm. We will have someone in that doesn’t play the old dirty game of politics. He’s learning how it is done, only to keep up, but, once in, Obama won’t play those stupid, mind, money, time, energy wasting games. America Loves You Obama. You are above the mess and will be able to clean it up when you are elected. I do believe it. And, so does most of the rest of the U.S.

Posted by: justicefromtruth | April 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

ABC did not do a good job at this debate.
You didn’t ask substantive questions on the issues, for the most part, and when
such questions were asked, they were asked
from a Republican vantage point.

Posted by: Edward Witten | April 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

And yet he wins in all the polls.

Posted by: BlueJersey | April 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

The only thing Obama tried to brush off was the stupid actions of YOUR media circus that involved the tiny Georgie and aging Charlie show.
LOL Check the net morons and your own poll. Obama beats Clinton in ALL polls out there other than at Little Georgies buddies Fox News.
ABC is now the bottom of heap in the media field and while you guys may never answer for it outloud? WE KNOW what’s gotta be going on behind the curtain LOL

Posted by: Brian | April 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Mr. Obama, crying time is over and if the lady put you in your place, take it like a man. She is not your advisary in the Republican party, she is your contemporary in the Democratic policy. If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Posted by: Barbara | April 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos
should feel some shame as should ABC and the parent corporation.
I believe Senator Obama when he says “We are in a defining moment in our history”. We have two candidates on the verge of making history for this country and that is the best you can do in terms of questions?
And the lead in quotes had no connection to the candidates as well as that really dumb last word guy who clearly pandered to Senator Clinton.
ABC – if you just want to give an hour in support of Senator Clinton why don’t you just do that and stop treating us like we are dumb.
Last – Is it just me or does Senator Clinton make out like a bandit – She gets media coverage for Chelsea and media coverage for Bill – thats 3 times the coverage for Senator Obama. Is Michelle still campaigning? Why not show a shot of his little girls watching their daddy debate?
ok I’m digressing.
Overall I think this debate like this article was terrible. I think Senator Obama did a better job of trying to elevate the conversation from the same old go nowhere arguments to the issues that really matter facing the people today.

Posted by: Peacepole1 | April 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Kudos ABC for the most impartial debate to date. Obama finally got the same scrutiny as Hillary Clinton has been under since day one. And he didn’t stand up very well at all.

Posted by: ladyliberty | April 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

What a disgrace of a debate. Get rid of Gibson and George both!Hillary fits right in with both of those guys,as she is also a disgrace! At least we now know who your new boss is.

Posted by: Carolyn Namura | April 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

I congratulate ABC news, Josh Gibson and Stephanopolous for the questions. Obama didnt get his softball questions that the media was giving to him in the past… now he is getting the tough questions and he stumbled miserably at it. I guess that is what happens when you dont have a prepared speech in front of you. Good job ABC now we see the truth behind the candidates. Finally a debate where the tought questions we need answers to comes out.

Posted by: SBing | April 17, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

That really was the worst debate I’ve seen in a long time. People who would actually vote for a black man or a woman or even a Democrat for that matter, do not care about the completely NON-issues you brought up last night!
Although I am an Obama supporter I have to say that I thought Clinton did a wonderful job when she was talking about the real issues like health care and the war in Iraq. I was getting so tired of her dirty tactics that I hated the thought of having to support her if by some miracle she won the nomination. But after her performance last night I will proudly support her. (That is not to say I have changed my allegiance!)

Posted by: Liz | April 17, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

merne111
what was wrong with it?

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Fed up of Obami supporters. Obami supporters believe this moron is second coming of Jesus.
To the professor whose children and grand children voting for Obami, no wonder you are aProfessor. You what they say about academic professors. Those who can can, those can’t manage and those who can’t either one teach.
But in all truth, you are not a professor but someone pretending to be one.

Posted by: Fed Up | April 17, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

“ABC Attempts to Brush off Debate Backlash”
Good luck with that one. When your ad revenue plummets over this, I suggest you make up the losses by gutting the “news division”, which serves no useful purpose that anyone can detect. Just hire actors to read AP wires and punch it up with some snazzy graphics.
I’ll be watching downloading all my episodes of Lost from now on. Your sponsors are on notice.

Posted by: Austin | April 17, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

I personally think he rope-a-doped her, sat back, took the blows from Clinton and the two moderators to drive up her negatives even more for Indiana. Obama said Indiana was the deciding state. Add that with recent polls and he played Ali to her Foreman.

Posted by: Shel | April 17, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Please, simply make a group post claiming how you all used to love George and Charlie and ABC and now hate them and how bad the debate was.

Posted by: geevill | April 17, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

I’m sooo glad to know that I’m not alone. I have faith in the people of America again, and I don’t need to put on my flag pin. Thanks ABC for bring us together, if only to agree you suck at debates.

Posted by: Sally | April 17, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

How dare you ask Obama about his relationship to a bigoted church. How dare they ask about bigotry like “typical white person”. We just want the economy fixed, no time to worry about hate. It’s starting to remind me of Germany in the 1930′s.

Posted by: cdd | April 17, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

How come all the Obama supporters think the debate was bad. Could it be their candidate was reduced to a stammering fool when he became pressed to show substance? Yeah, substance!

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

How come all the Obama supporters think the debate was bad. Could it be their candidate was reduced to a stammering fool when he became pressed to show substance? Yeah, substance!

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Who won the debate? Surely not the American People. I guess if you look up to FOX news (?) you won. You are right up there with them. What a bunch of tabloid sensationalism. You have no respect for the American people and now I have no respect for you or your sponsors. Like FOX, you are nothing but entertainment NEWS.
Very disappointed X-viewer

Posted by: Kathy | April 17, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Great debate, didn’t change the channel once. Hillary won. Obama bumbled and needed a teleprompter and has only himself to blame.

Posted by: Jean | April 17, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Give it a rest. It was just one debate among many. It’s not like they cut him off before he was able to unveil his cure for cancer.

Posted by: Mack | April 17, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

ABC’s debate was no better than sleazy tabloid type journalism last night. That was shameful, and lends truth to everything that is being said about us abroad. Obama held his own in the face of ridiculous questions, but I agree that he was uncomfortable. I would be very discouraged if he had appeared right at home like Hillary did. The attacks were very republican-like (read as twisted, cruel, ignorant, and outright lies.) I would expect no less from HC, her campaign is being run just like GWs was, next she’ll start questioning the legitimacy of his kids to sway voters. She is dispicable, and ABC should be ashamed.

Posted by: Lisa | April 17, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

All this back and forth merely hides the reality that is as clear today as it ever was: Obama will be the next nominee of the Democratic Party. The math does not add up for Clinton, no matter how you slice it. The only question now is whether Clinton is willing to sacrifice the party for her own ego. The answer to this question should be obvious: she cares only for herself. So, Obama just has to endure the narcisisstic world of the Clintons until this reaches its end, and then turn his attention to McCain.
In this sense, she is doing Obama a favor: McCain could not possibly be as distasteful, mean-spirited, and low-rent as she is. Obama is seeing it as bad as it will get. Brush it off is right. Obama is our next president.

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

I say, great job, ABC! Just because the Obamaites want to pretend that these issues wont be the main focus of the general election, the fact is they will and will, in the end, lead to a republican win. Regardless of where each of us stands, THAT, and that alone, should be the issue for every democrat.
I have serious issues with Obama, that are continuously belittled. I am tired of being called racist, poor white and confused, uneducated, or even a Regan dem. I did not vote republican ever, but I will; that is a fact. I will, because I can not, do not, believe that Mr. Obama understands or respects me as an American or as a voter, let alone as a long-standing democrat.
I cried when Regan was elected twice, when both Bush’s were elected, and I will cry again when McCain wins, with my vote, but I cannot opt out and not vote( that is fundamentally against my beliefs as a citizen), and I will not support a man who continuously and repeatedly belittles my opinions, who does not answer honestly, and who associates with too many people I cannot understand.
If he cannot win my vote, he certainly will not pick up many republican votes, let alone the the votes of people like me. Without these votes, there is no way that dem.s have anywhere near enough to win. This is reality. I am so sorry that winning now is so important to Mr. Obama and his supporters that they will allow this to happen; that they continue to support this disaster.
I fear where we are going as a nation.

Posted by: drae | April 17, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

The questions from ABC were a disgrace!

Posted by: David Sites | April 17, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Presidential debates should be taken seriously, it should not be about who you like or if they are the same color as you, ABC did a very poor job and am embarassed for them, We are suffering in this country, people are loosing their jobs and their homes, and all ABC moderators are thinking about are gossips and rumours, or maybe it is the fault of the executives at ABC who send out moderators with no clues of the meaning of Presidential debate.

Posted by: shirley | April 17, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Shame on ABC News for a poorly-run debate and pathetic, “gotcha” questions. It’s an insult to your viewers. I’ll be getting my news elsewhere from now on, thanks…

Posted by: Amy | April 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

shame on abc worst debate in history but
it was a great supprise to see the atack on obama,it was so small of them and showed their IQ

Posted by: Linda Thompson | April 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

What a joke. ABC and its moderators were horrible!

Posted by: M.D. | April 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Flag lapel pins.
Really guys? Haha, you suck.

Posted by: Jeremy | April 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Yeah except the Republicans are like tigers and Clinton is a kitten ni comparison.
So yeah it is a preview and you wilted under that very kind examination.
Obama is unelectable dems. Don’t throw away the white house. This man can’t win. He is left of left of left.
Dems don’t win with far left candidates from the North East. Then take away Florida, Ohio, and Michigan.
Then kiss the white house good bye.

Posted by: s.b. | April 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

All the polls say he won because all of the Obamabots are clearing their files and cookies and voting over and over and over!

Posted by: dh629 | April 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

What a circus. This was like an “US Weekly” debate… flag pins? I’m horrified. Goodbye ABC – I won’t be back.

Posted by: em19 | April 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

After analyzing the debate last night. I’ve decided to vote Obama. I like neither candidate, but Obama is the better of two evils. I agree with most of the bloggers. The debate seemed to be completely one-sided

Posted by: Decided in PA | April 17, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

According to Webster’s dictionary, a debate is defined as: a regulated discussion of a proposition between two matched sides.
How does inquiring about a lapel pin qualify as a debate issue?
It was insulting what Charles and George did last night. I expect better from both of them.
Kevin

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Obama’s campaign is ahead in only one aspect, they have an awful lot of bloggers who sit in front of their computers and “vote” on the polls (“all of them”) and say Obama won. Then they go on all the sites and make comments critical of ABC. This is the nastiness that Obama’s campaign is. This would be laughable if the presidential campaign were not so important. Just saying Obama won does not make it so, Obama lost, and a lot of voters are seeing just how incompetent he is.

Posted by: svsolis | April 17, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

This was the worst “debate” ever. No substance at all. This is the stuff that turns people away from politics. I was so excited 2 years ago about the possibility of a woman president, now I just feel ill every time I hear her speak. That Wolfson guy just gives me the creeps. I heard him on MSNBC after the debate and it made me just want to turn of the TV and forget about this election. I am so sick of the Karl Rove-George Bush-Hillary Clinton style of politics. Somebody please make them all go away!!!

Posted by: Bored | April 17, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Come on complainers. Obama acted like a juvenile. Stop blaming ABC for his ineptitude.

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

ABC is an arm of the CLINTON CAMPAIGN!
PASS IT ON!

Posted by: Sam | April 17, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Anyone who wants to know a candidates position, can go to their web site. If people can take the time to come on here and complain, then they should go to the website and see where the candidates stand. This debate was about character, electability and issues. Obama has had alot of press lately about his associations and his bitter comment. These are questions he will have to answer if he gets to the General Eleciton. Charlie and George were asking questions about things that are on peoples minds. They then covered health care, the economy, the war, raising taxes. I think the Obama supporters have been so busy watching stations like CNN and MSNBC that have been so bias for Obama, that they thought he would get another pass during this debate, which didn’t happen. He finally was asked the hard questions and he must of thought he would get a pass also because he didn’t seem prepared.

Posted by: Annie | April 17, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

I am sleepy…I watched the debate last night and then watched the analysis for the remainder of the night and after all that I don’t know who won.

Posted by: Dooley Twig | April 17, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

ABC News ought to be ashamed of the way they handled the debate last night. George and Charlie acted more more like reporters for the Enquirer. And how is it not a conflict of interest for Stephanopolous to be a moderator? And all those pans to Chelsea every time she smiled. I hope the electorate is smart enough to see just how smarmy that whole deal was last night.

Posted by: CelticOdyssey | April 17, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

I cannot believe ABC allowed Clintonite George Stephanopolis to do such an unprofessional “hit job” on Obama. Such unprofessional, tabloid questions amounted to an ad hominum attack on the Senator personally. This was the worst of journalism. You should be ashamed of yourselves. I would have expected more of Charlie Gibson, but he just caved. I’m embarrassed for you all.

Posted by: arizonajan | April 17, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

What is everyone complaining about? It was a great debate, best so far. Obama lack of experience and vulnerability were on full display. He’s a fraud. McCain has this wrapped up, will probably win 40 states.

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

ABC, last night debate really sucks, bored and biased. It was like watching Rush and Hannity shows. I wished i never watched this misleading debate…..

Posted by: chawilly | April 17, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

I thought I was watching an episode of Gerry Springer! I think that was the most unprofessional job by moderators in supposedly a serious format. The first 45-50 minutes was truly pathetic in the lack of questions from the moderators, it was like they were trying to dig up dirt rather then question either candidate on the important issues the American public are truly concerned about. I do not know who controls content for ABC news, but they really, really should get out of the news business and into talk/gossip show business, really would reall be good at it! As for the moderators, they really belong in show business, I think Edward R. Murrow, Fred Freindly and other people from the past noted fro their journalistic integrity would be furious with such shallow questions without substance to the candidates, it really was a waste of my time. I hope ABC never does another debate, it was truly a wasted 90 minutes for me.

Posted by: paul | April 17, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

I liked the tough questions for Barack.
I will support the Democratic nominee in the general election. I wish the Hillary haters would tone it down. Nobody that ever lived could be “that bad”. I personally liked the “screw them” comment. It was not patronizing or condescending like the “guns and religion” comment by Barack. Rather it seemed more like a Teddy Roosevelt or John Wayne comment.
I think too many Obama supporters have computers and may overstate Obama’s case for Him. Older voters are not being heard as well on the Blogs. This could be a problem that might lead to over confidence. Nobody thought Bush would win except Karl Rove.
Right now I am for HRC.

Posted by: sam y | April 17, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

ABC, last night debate really sucks, bored and biased. It was like watching Rush and Hannity shows. I wished i never watched this misleading debate…..

Posted by: chawilly | April 17, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Worst debate ever . . . ABC blew this one even bigger than FOX usually blows. . .

Posted by: Ryan | April 17, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

ABC is manipulating the news! The slant is becoming obvious and that’s how the US got stuck with GWB!

Posted by: jon | April 17, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

I am so disappointed in the ABC moderators. I loved watching George on Sunday morning. No More! And Charlie – do you think Walter would have been proud of you? We all make mistakes. Please, both of you, own up to yours.

Posted by: Hope4all of us | April 17, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

drae:I feel exactly as you do. I have said for years I would never vote Republican, but you can be sure that if Obama is nominated, which looks likely, I will vote for McCain.

Posted by: ddd | April 17, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

I can’t believe what I watched on TV last night was billed as a “debate”. There were no issues debated professionally, but instead I felt like I was watching two cub reporters (Charles & George) from one of those supermarket tabloid magazines repeatedly beat Obama with a rubber hose trying to get info on purported stories, rumors, gossip and innuendo!! How insulting to me and the rest of Americans who tuned in thinking they were going to hear intelligent discussion of the relevant issues facing our country and the rest of the world. How DARE we expect to ACTUALLY GAIN something worthwhile from watching the “debate” that would help us in deciding which of the candidates would best represent the Democrats in the upcoming election? This was like watching sophomoric, amaturish, small-time TV at its worst, and not the professionalism I expected from a nationally syndicated news team. It’s apparent that ABC can’t be unbiased or trusted to address the issues that really concern Americans, and as such, I will choose NBC and MSNBC for my news from now on.

Posted by: Leslie in Minnesota | April 17, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Obama’s “weak debate performance”??? He showed admirable restraint when asked petty tabloid questions again and again. Voters have decided already whether they think that Wright is an issue — look at the polls. And flag pins?? As Bill would say — give me a break!

Posted by: Sally | April 17, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Regardless of whether viewers support Clinton or Obama, ABC’s “moderators” for last night’s Democratic debate were beyond horrible — Chihuahuas trying to pee on Great Danes.
What an embarrassment and disservice to American television and politics.
DLC

Posted by: David Cattanach | April 17, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

I’ve seen Obama be tough when he has to. Almost all the polls and debate report cards give him the better ‘score’ for the debate. Instead of bragging or being arrogant over this, he choose to show humor. Whatever he does is wrong, to the rigid Clinton-hate-howlers. I’ll be so glad when this is all over and they can stop spewing; talk about brain-washed.

Posted by: Kay | April 17, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

George S hasn’t been associated with the Clintons in over 10 years. Unlike Obama who sat in that church for 20 years until just recently listening to his favorite Rev Wright. G D America!
Obama looked weak. Hillary did not. Obama will probably win the nom and McCain is going to win. Obama will never win in the general election

Posted by: Kevin | April 17, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

the debate should be a critical embarassment to ABC-”Tabloidism” I certainly will not watch ABC anymore! Whoa!!!!!! I feel both showed their true colors: Hillary showing her true experience with Washington, same old dirty politics she was very comfortable in the debate because she embraces dirty politics. Obama kept his vision of hope alive. I love that Obama doesn’t sell his soul to the old politics. Rock on Obama-I am so very proud to be an Obama supporter!

Posted by: Sophia Beck | April 17, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Come on ! How much more BS are the American people going to take from this guy??? Every tough question is answered with some version of “old politics”. Every Obama supporter must remember that there is equal to if not more support (“count the votes”) for his opponent regardless of what the Obama cheerleading media networks deliver.
Obviously…Hillary “08

Posted by: catherine in nm | April 17, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Worst debate questions ever. Didn’t realize ABC News was the National Enquirer.

Posted by: Andrew | April 17, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

I didn’t think anything would bring Clinton supporters and Obama supporters together, but you’ve done it ABC! Thank you!!!
We’ll just be needing George Stephanopolis’ head on a platter of course. It’s not like it’s being used for anything.

Posted by: John in SD | April 17, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Obama proved last night that he is not such a great orator after all.
He lost the Ohio debate too.

Posted by: USmarine0331 | April 17, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

S: I don’t know if there was anything in the 4 questions they spent 50 minutes on that was not asked and answered before by Obama himself. All were addressed weeks before. Only If you never followed the election, not even read watched the evening news for weeks, would you think any of this is new. So one has to think there is an ulterior motives for George S .. he is suspect to say the least because of his association to a right wing hatchet man like Sean Hannity who George was on his show the day before.

Posted by: Jan E | April 17, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

We’ll just be needing George Stephanopolis’ head on a platter of course. It’s not like it’s being used for anything.
Posted by: John in SD | Apr 17, 2008 4:02:48 PM
GREAT POST, John!!

Posted by: sue | April 17, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

As a 72 year old, white Philadelphian, I was appalled at the ABC “debate” between the two Democratic presidential candidates last night. Both George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson wasted two hours of my time as they tried to embarass Senator Obama and somehow imply that he was unpatriotic or elitist or ingnorant of how most of us in PA felt. At times they reminded me of the late and unlamented Senator Joseph McCarthy. If this passes for news on ABC, I truly mourn for its integrity and lost intelligence.

Posted by: fwine | April 17, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Too funny! ABC news has to get it’s questions from FOX now. Can come up with your own questions ABC?

Posted by: Stephen Cooper | April 17, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Outstanding debate and I believe Hillary won.

Posted by: Dooley Twig | April 17, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

It was embarrassing to watch the mediators ask such silly questions. Now I know why I watch MSNBC and CNN, they don’t speak down to the public. Do the executives at ABC really think the American people are that stupid?

Posted by: Lori Cardille | April 17, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Come on folks, all of the debates have been dumb, not just this one. Would you feel better if George would have asked him if he preferred diamonds or pearls?
Obama’s gaffes have been in the forefront of this news cycle and that is where the questions focussed. Obama should have been prepared for this and he wasn’t. If Obama would have answered these questions satisfactorily in the past, maybe they wouldn’t have been front and center last night.
He better start coming up with a better line than “politics of the past” and “let’s move on” or “I already gave a speach on this” if he wants to beat McCAin, or he is going to be brushing himself off a lot come the GE.

Posted by: J | April 17, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

I thought I was watching FOX. The most sorry questions ever

Posted by: jim | April 17, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

The Democrats would not debate on FOX News Channel but thank goodness they went on ABC and got some tough questions. It’s about time!! Thank you ABC. Last night made up for the stupid decision to keep the radical, America-hating Rosie O’Donnell on The View for so long.

Posted by: Jim P | April 17, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

I thought I was watching FOX. The most sorry questions ever

Posted by: jim | April 17, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Obama is a cry baby. I thought he was the one who are trying to move the blame on Hillary all alone the debate yesterday.

Posted by: JACK | April 17, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

WOW! Congratulations ABC on the new “George and Charlie Show”. Interesting format. Two ex-journalists debate with candidates using irrelevant questions. I think it will be a big hit with your parent company Disney and prove that their strategy of transforming news into entertainment was wise and beneficial to the ratings.

Posted by: Jack Sheehan | April 17, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

YOur poll shows him winning the debate 3-1
your cover says Obama brushes off debate
you inside story says Obama attempto to brush off debate
I say you switch back to non-fictional reporting…

Posted by: Lenny | April 17, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

ABC should be ashamed of these questions. A sad decline in journalism. What is wrong with a question such as, “Senator, what is your analysis of. . .?” (Fill in the blank with any number of pressing domestic and foreign policy topics.) I felt like I was listening to questions that had been formulated by Republican hacks to fit a Republican frame. And Gibson’s manipulated statistics on Cap. gains taxes vs revenue were an outrage.

Posted by: robert Bibler | April 17, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

That was cute doing the hokey pokey for audience.
You put your Wright shoulder in… you put your Wright shoulder out, you do the hokey pokey and you turn your campaign around, that’s what it’s all about!

Posted by: smartprimate | April 17, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Someone please tell Obama that we don’t need more arrogance in the White House either.
He only shows this side of him in front of his followers and a teleprompter.
Face to face, live, one on one with direct uncomfortable questions, he wimps out. Shows his true cowardice side. ( I think he is afraid of Hillary)
You’ll see the same for sure if he makes the nomination and faces the republicans.
Don’t be fooled, we’re only just now beginning to see who the real Barack Obama is. A typical ordinary (arrogant) politician, capable of all he accuses his foes of being.
Please don’t let the media sway you, make up your own minds.
Peace.

Posted by: aquaglass | April 17, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

ABC must stand for Are Backing Clinton. What you aired last night demeans every PA resident. If you think PA will vote based upon discussion of a lapel pin then your condescension has run amok. Pennsylvanians are not simple-minded, backwards imbeciles led by the latest tabloid headline. Pennsylvanians are intelligent, strong and patriotic. They are not there for your mockery or manipulation. I quote your heroine, “Shame on you.” My confidence in ABC, which has often required defense, has been shaken to the core. Then again, what could I possibly know? I’m just a female, middle-class, Catholic Pennsylvanian.

Posted by: Christa | April 17, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

What does he think of us? Idiots?

Posted by: Speechless | April 17, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

ABC must stand for Are Backing Clinton. What you aired last night demeans every PA resident. If you think PA will vote based upon discussion of a lapel pin then your condescension has run amok. Pennsylvanians are not simple-minded, backwards imbeciles led by the latest tabloid headline. Pennsylvanians are intelligent, strong and patriotic. They are not there for your mockery or manipulation. I quote your heroine, “Shame on you.” My confidence in ABC, which has often required defense, has been shaken to the core. Then again, what could I possibly know? I’m just a female, middle-class, Catholic Pennsylvanian.

Posted by: Christa | April 17, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

If Obama can’t handle this, he’ll never be able to handle the republicans. He should just man up and just admit he had a bad night, no one is perfect, but to play this wounded victim role is really unattractive and unbecoming of a leader. Do your history, this is a picnic compare to the founding fathers. The job of President is tough and he needs to stop whining.

Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | April 17, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Obama looked and sounded weak. I wish he would stop using “we” instead of “I”. It makes him sound like Queen Victoria – or an elite snob.

Posted by: smalltownvoter | April 17, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

When 2008 began, it was impossible to find a non-partisan analyst who did not project a big year for the Democrats. George W Bush barely scaled 30% in the polls, the Iraq War was deeply unpopular and the economy was weakening.
Moreover, both of the top Democrats, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, appeared to have substantial advantages over a deeply divided and often unimpressive Republican presidential field.
The Democrats, we all said, would clearly have to try hard to waste this opportunity. Well, they, with the help of the media, are trying very hard to do just that.
And the party’s history of losing competitive elections in the modern era suggests they have the experience to do it again. John McCain won twice on 4 March. He locked up the GOP nomination, and he got his fondest wish, too – a continuing marathon among his Democratic opponents that keeps them warring with one another rather than uniting and turning their money and troops against him.

Posted by: mature view | April 17, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

After watching the circus last night, it confirmed that Obama is not the man for President. He may be the nominee and if so I will vote McCain. I have heard a lot of people say the same thing I’m saying, no ;way can they vote for Obama

Posted by: barefootboy9 | April 17, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

YOur poll says obama won 3-1
YOur article says he got roughed up
So you saying he won overwhelmingly but he got roughed up…
Just dosent look good ABC- and than with Clinton’s former advisor facilitating. Do you think we are 3rd graders?

Posted by: Lenny | April 17, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

1) ABC’s own polls says he won by a margin over 2:1
2) ABC still needs to apologize to me for not asking about the issues.
save the gotcha stuff for the Sunday morning talk shows and interviews. this was a debate without debate.

Posted by: Vonda | April 17, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

obama had plenty of opportuinities to attack hillary on bosnia e.t.c but like a wise president, HA he restrained himself, that is the kind of good judgement we need from the next president, good judgement and common sense!

Posted by: jacobs | April 17, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Maybe now – people will begin to realize Obama is not ready. Maybe now – the young people and voters of this country will realize that Hillary clearly has the edge on the experience front and the ability to lead. Last night’s debate performance by Obama was a wake up call for America. I only hope the voters make the right decision.
Obama will not beat McCain.
Clinton will beat McCain.
Mark my words.
PA, NC, IN and beyond – for the Democratic Party – it is imperative we make the right choice…so we can win.

Posted by: Fred | April 17, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Please attack a candidate based on his own values, not those of his pastor, a person they sat on the board of a non profit with. It shows me how scared the Republicans and Clinton supporters are running because all of the attacks leveled against Obama are not about him, but about various people who are loosely connected to him (exception rev. Wright). However, I am a catholic and do not agree with some of the teachings of my church. As my priest would conduct mass and often admonish many things that I do not believe are wrong and took radical stances on many issues, I never walked out because church is about a community. You may not always agree with the ideas of the priest, but it is about more than thay individual.

Posted by: J. Dima | April 17, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Next time get Margret Warner and Gwen Ifel. Both are talented panel moderators and ask more thoughtful and researched questions. By the way, this wasn’t a debate. It was a structured Q and A.

Posted by: 63tango | April 17, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

svsolis,
Yeah, they get an email of the daily talking points. today is attack ABC day
note how many use the same language such as the word “tabloid” and how they all just loved ABC and the moderators until last night.

Posted by: geevill | April 17, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Flaws in Marketing Obama Brand
==============================
I understand why the voters who have bought everything the Obama campaign sold including promises such as, “Will Change Washington,” “Change Begins from Bottom to Top; not from Top to Bottom”, “Hope”, “A new vision” ,etc. are so upset with the debate and Charles Gibson.
However, if they just took a minute to contemplate what aspects of Washington Senator Obama can change as the President of the United States with his words and speeches, they would come to realize that it would be difficult to get rid of “old politics” for Senator Obama when he had asked and accepted support from senators like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, etc. How do you get rid of old politics when you have a bunch of old politicians as your surrogates?
Senator Obama gives beautiful speeches that sound good, but he cannot make the House and the Senate disappear overnight. He is not a magician. He cannot make Republican Senators to hold hands with Democratic Senators and get them to unite. Senator Obama does not excel or specialize in hypnosis.
If change is to take place from bottom, SEnator Obama at the top as the President of the United States would not have to do much after getting elected as the president. People who are supporting him are supposed to make something happen. Do those people know what they want? More importantly, do those people at the bottom agree on what they want? Do they even know what “change” Senator Obama is preaching about?
Those who claim Senator Obama is a visionary, what are Senator Obama’s visions? What is Obama’s America like? A country where he can promise things like “change”, “hope”, “visions” without having to define what they are explicitly? That would not be a very smart country.

Posted by: Crystal Coy | April 17, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

was the reporting this malicious when JFK broke through to win?

Posted by: Lenny | April 17, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

ABC did an excellent job in asking the tough questions of Obama, which he did not answer.

Posted by: Dooley Twig | April 17, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

The debate lats night was a farce. ABC News disgusts me.

Posted by: klandon83 | April 17, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I won’t vote for hillary because she is not honest, it’s that simple

Posted by: fred | April 17, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I think the questions that were asked in this debate were irrelevant. I wanted to hear you ask questions about what their plan is for the following years. No one asked about the economy. It was almost like that wanted put Barack on trial for people he had relationships with. This was just a huge waist of my time. I was very disappointed.

Posted by: tiffany | April 17, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

That so called debate was so biased in favor of HRC and the Disney agenda that it was hardly worth watching.
More to the point, it has backfired. Now more than ever Americans, who aren’t as stupid as ABC seems to believe they are, are seeing the obvious bias of many in the main street media against Senator Obama.
Much to their displeasure, to paraphrase Maya Angelou, “and still he rises”.

Posted by: krod001 | April 17, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Kevin, i agree with you, obama will never win the general election in November. I dont think i could ever vote for this man. I would say im more independant rather than rep or dem, however i would vote democrat if i trusted this man at all. I trust Hillary and feel she would be the perfect Person for the job..
Go Hillary!!

Posted by: ryan | April 17, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Bishop:
Neither did Obama. The Clintonista distortions on these issues are coming back to bite her.
The Obama delegate lead continues to click up!!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 17, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I won’t vote for hillary because she is not honest, it’s that simple

Posted by: fred | April 17, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

you’ve got to be kidding. that was an embarrassment of a debate. tabloid trash tv. nothing of substance for nearly an hour. ABC has embarrassed themselves but it’s all about the ratings i suppose.

Posted by: jtk | April 17, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

That was like being invited to a party for several hours, and then for the first hour, have the room throw crap in your face. Interesting tnat they chose George, a former Clinton person, to ask the questions. And Charlie is no longer my favorite newsperson, and ABC news will not be watched here again. And what in the world was that question, among the other “Good Lord” questions, about the flag pin? How could that have anything to do with the running of this country? Obama wil survive this, because the truly sightful people will see to it.

Posted by: wanda | April 17, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

The ABC reporters looked to me more like Fox news. Their performance was worthy of Brit Hume, Sean Hannety and the likes. At a time when people are losing their jobs, homes, life insurance, that the situation in Iraq worsens by the day (another suicide attack today!), they worry about a Flag on a Lapel. Is this serious or what??? Now, how objective can a former Clintonista be with his old boss? Be serious. Whatever happened to the issues???

Posted by: Carlos Torres | April 17, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

It looked to me as if Hillary knew the questions before they were asked. One might wonder if George [who worked for the Clintons] might have prepared her for them.

Posted by: Gene | April 17, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

For the last few years I have watched Mr. Gibson’s broadcasts and regarded him as a fine, articulate, and focused journalist. It is especially depressing therefore, to have seen him descend to the level of tabloid journalism in last night’s debacle; for that’s what it was: not a debate, a debacle. Behavior like this could be expected from a hack like Stephanopoulus, but the nation deserved better from Mr. Gibson. The sensationalism you tried to invent last night had already been vetted and found insignificant by an electorate that has finally begun to show more intellect and reasoning capacities than ABC News.
Mr. Gibson, you are now on a par with Mr. Rather; I hope it was worth it to you last night to surrender your legacy. You would do well to understudy Mr. Lehrer, who now remain the last mainstream journalist left in the business with any integrity.

Posted by: Sam Adams | April 17, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

That was like being invited to a party for several hours, and then for the first hour, have the room throw crap in your face. Interesting tnat they chose George, a former Clinton person, to ask the questions. And Charlie is no longer my favorite newsperson, and ABC news will not be watched here again. And what in the world was that question, among the other “Good Lord” questions, about the flag pin? How could that have anything to do with the running of this country? Obama wil survive this, because the truly sightful people will see to it.

Posted by: wanda | April 17, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Hmm, I guess the honeymoon between Obama and ABC has finally come to an end.

Posted by: A Fake Idol & A Fake Politician | April 17, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Cannot believe Obama is so immature.
Grow up OBAMA. Do not cry.

Posted by: JACK | April 17, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

60% of the American public thinks HRC is dishonest. 60%!!! Nuff Said. Obama 08′

Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Two words for George, Charlie and ABC News: YOU STINK! Leave the political reporting/coverage/debates to CNN and MSNBC and go back to all that sensational junk you’re so good at smearing over the airwaves. Your “display” last night shows that you’re right in line with FOX News. Here that massive “click”? That’s America turning off ABC News.

Posted by: sheila | April 17, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

why won’t ABC pick up the phone, come on Barack answered questions about lapel pins, and about his neighbors behavior when Barack was 8?
Are those questions more fair than:
Stephanopolus- Clintons former advisor facilitates debate?
Your own polls show him overwhelmingly winning debate? yet you still print the editorial pre-debate meeting. Yes some of this stuff is leaking. Better pick up that phone ABC.

Posted by: Lenny | April 17, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

There is nothing special about Obama. He has memorized lines to the issues, same ole, same ole. Obama is getting old, fast. His image that he created for himself is like an role in a movie film. He cant answer tough questions, just repeat the same memorized lines with pauses in between. umm, anddd, sooo, ect. Watch him enough and you see there is nothing new that comes out of his mind about anything. He is no leader, has no solutions to problems, just speaches. My first que to this was questions about his Rev Wright. He told reporters he was giving a speach tomorrow. I dont want to hear a speach, I want answers to questions. This seems to be a down fall of his. Makes you think what real knowledge he has in his mind. His well crafted image is old news now. He has only had the advantage in the fact that many people didnt know anything about him. Now they are begining to learn, and they dont like him.

Posted by: mark | April 17, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

There is nothing special about Obama. He has memorized lines to the issues, same ole, same ole. Obama is getting old, fast. His image that he created for himself is like an role in a movie film. He cant answer tough questions, just repeat the same memorized lines with pauses in between. umm, anddd, sooo, ect. Watch him enough and you see there is nothing new that comes out of his mind about anything. He is no leader, has no solutions to problems, just speaches. My first que to this was questions about his Rev Wright. He told reporters he was giving a speach tomorrow. I dont want to hear a speach, I want answers to questions. This seems to be a down fall of his. Makes you think what real knowledge he has in his mind. His well crafted image is old news now. He has only had the advantage in the fact that many people didnt know anything about him. Now they are begining to learn, and they dont like him.

Posted by: mark | April 17, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

As I watch last night debate it came to mind is this a political commercial for Hilary put together by her husband’s press secretary. It is a shame that ABC had to lend there name to this horrible tabloid journalism. I have watched every debate and now ABC can be proud that they have run the worst debate I have ever seen.

Posted by: Rose | April 17, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

I thought the debate last night was boring and in the true spirt of today’s tabloid news. It brings to mind “those who can do, those who can’t become fustrated journalist who host tabloid debates on ABC”. Next time let TMZ host the debates and I will know what I am getting. It was a totally bias, 3 against 1. WHY? I expected more. Shame on me for tuning in.

Posted by: Karen in Charlotte NC | April 17, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

sheila – Waa. Waa. Waa.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

George is a SHAMELESS JOURNALIST who is
bought by Clinton Campaign.If he does not
resign, ABC should fire him. SHAME on you
George, you are disgrace to Journalism.

Posted by: Sam Winters | April 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

20 years and Obama didn’t hear one racist statement from Rev. Wright. Oh Come On Now!

Posted by: Dooley Twig | April 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

i would have to change my vote to mccain if obama were to win the nomination for the democratic party…mccain is the better, more trustworthy candidate..i hope Hillary gets it tho, i would vote for her for sure.

Posted by: ryan | April 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I declare the following words dead:
elitist
karma
racist
whiner
Anyone who uses them from now on is a whining elitist racist with bad karma. Come up with some new ways to express your opinion. nuf said.

Posted by: Paolo | April 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Easily the worst political debate I have
ever watched on TV.It was a stacked deck
against Obama.
Shame on ABC.

Posted by: Solhaug | April 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Come on ABC that was the worst most immature and corrupted debate I have ever seen. Why did it take 45 minutes to ask questions on policy? It was a PR event for conservatives and had nothing to do with real journalism. It is an International joke which I have read about today on many nations newspapers. You have surpassed faux news for banality and lack of respect for the process of democratic systems so you can ask Britney spears type questions. It was a set up for corporate control of dialogue. Shame on you!
A Canadian embarrased at the Grade school level of debate on ABC.

Posted by: gael koob | April 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Pick up the phone ABC- the american people have some questions.

Posted by: Lenny | April 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

This was the best debate EVER!!!
You definitely educated us about the candidates and where they stand on the issues!
You challenged their “pull-out” strategy from Iraq – taking into account the number of possible casualities on both the Iraqi and the Americans – No Network, even the so called Number One Network NBC, has ever done that.
Charlie and George you definitely did your homework – you were very knowlegeable and thourough – you left no stone unturned. Well done!!!
You are Number One! You are DEFINITELY THE BEST!!
Thank you!!!
Ethel

Posted by: Ethel Voyi | April 17, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

WHAT A THEATRICAL PERFORMANCE -
I DIDN’T KNOW HE WANTED TO BE AN ACTOR.

Posted by: Frank, South Hampton, nY | April 17, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Last night debate was the wort debate I have ever watched. I don’t care about who Obama may or may not know or if he has a flag lapel. I care about the economy, gas prices, rioting around the world over food costs, our failing school systems, crime, the environment, the war and so many more issues that affect my life and the life of humans across the world but this debate was as about nothing more than school yard gossip.
Both of the moderators should be fired for being so out of touch with the lives of real Americans. needless to say I will not be getting any of my news from ABC ever again.

Posted by: chris | April 17, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

you obama supporters need to get a grip.
the media was extremely biased a few months ago when the they thought obama was a god. you whiners. i guess theyre finally realizing that he is far from qualified to take in the most important position in the world. he is a joke. i’ll admit, he has charisma, but thats it. he’s empty and is not prepared to take on the issues the country is facing.

Posted by: itscindya | April 17, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

BRAVO ABC! Its about time someone had the GUTS to allow Barack Obama to demonstrate that he is NOT ready for prime time. I appreciate your efforts but fear that it may be too late for the Dems. Too bad this didn’t happen sooner…I would have saved $$$$ on “wasted” donations.

Posted by: JOE T | April 17, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Shame on you Charlie and George! Why did you waste the majority of the debate on stuff that no one cares about. At the end you say quickly we only have a little time left and then ask a legitimate question??? Obama can take the heat but the American people deserve a real debate not a gotcha. This is precisely why we need a change!

Posted by: Banks | April 17, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

hillary supporters obama was set up last night! we all know it!!! so dont try to pull no wool over our eyes, your candidate is a complete fraud!!!she seemed to know what questions were gonna be based, and he stood his ground!!!! shame on hillary supporters the republicans and ABC!!!

Posted by: jacobs | April 17, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

to all obamaites the focus groups of undecided voters at the debate went to clinton 51% obama 23% and tie 21% so spin it all you like as the focus groups are the true measure not online polls that obamaites with no responsibilites can take the time during the day to vote on.

Posted by: don tufts | April 17, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Obama did fine.
Looks like Charlie got a bit rattle when discussing capital gains tax.
I didn’t know that hedge fund managers earning hundreds of millions of dollars but they pay at a lower tax rate than there secretaries.
Didn’t know that Clinton pardoned 2 members of the Weather Underground.
Wonder why Ayers never went to prison.
Maybe because his family was rich.

Posted by: Mr. Unite Us | April 17, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Was last night’s debate supposed to be a joke or did it just turn out that way because of the incompetent moderators ? Charlie Gibson and George ( can’t enough of those good years that I worked for the Clintons ) Stephanoupolis. How can McCain possibly lose this election. He has such a commanding grasp of economical issues . His way to fix the problem of soaring gas prices is ” Let’s give the people a tax holiday.” I am afraid that it is John McCain who needs a holiday

Posted by: Ron | April 17, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

It’s a shame when have two millionaires asking tabloid type questions to candidates instead asking how are the candidates proposing to help fix some of the problems of working class people in this country face everyday. I never thought ABC would stoop to this level of so-called journalism. Is everything today about a Paris Hilton mentality?

Posted by: Joseph | April 17, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

I wonder why 60% of Americans think HRC is dishonest.
Obama didn’t go after her about the sniper fire debacle simply because he didn’t need to. This race was over a month ago. Obama 08′.

Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

I wasted my time watching the so-called debate Wednesday night. What a example of yellow journalism! Most of the debate was an attack on Obama! ABC you should be ashamed! I thought I had tuned in to FOX news or The enquirer!

Posted by: Patricia polm | April 17, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Shame on ABC – Shame on you! That was the worst debate EVER. ABC – I will never watch your news again!

Posted by: DC | April 17, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

The moronic comments from those that thought this was a genuine debate demonstrate the intellectual level ABC is pandering to.
ABC, you loose. You are right up there with FOX when it comes to trivial, foolish and irrelevant news media. I use the term “news” loosely. The debate focused on gossip and pitiful attempts to make two intelligent leaders look foolish. Guess who looks foolish? The producers and news people at ABC.

Posted by: Joanne | April 17, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Interesting debate last night.
It brought back very fond memories of the ‘managed democracy’ enjoyed by the peoples of the former Warsaw pact states. That was when a ‘free and fair’ media helped citizens ‘select’ the candidate they were supposed to vote for.
Perhaps in the future Charles Gibson can get a job writing for Pravda, or at least Fox News. Utterly vile.

Posted by: Richardson | April 17, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Dont say Obama was setup by anyone, he just couldnt answer questions. Just shows what he is all about, ignorance.

Posted by: lathisha | April 17, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Great job ABC!!! It’s good to see one network didn’t just lob softballs at the candidates.

Posted by: RJ | April 17, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

The debate was excellent! Obama , for the first time had to answer for his actions. Believe it or not, reporters are to ask the hard questions and find the facts for the American people . These answers and facts given help the American people to have good discussions and make educated decisions who will get their vote. The Presidency is not a game, it should not be bought by who can raise the most money, it should be won by the one who understands the issues and has the solutions. We don’t need another arrogant President in the White House!

Posted by: jp,michigan | April 17, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

I was at Obama’s town hall meeting in Raleigh earlier today. The crowd there absolutely loved him. When he brought up the subject of the debate and Hillary Clinton, they were booing. Even a couple of people who were there said that they were Clinton supporters (although weak supporters) until the debate. They said that her nastiness towards a fellow democrat was the icing on the cake for them. They are now with team Obama. The fact of the matter is that the moderators should have asked Obama hard questions, but the same should have been done of Hillary. How could they not ask about Colombia or her “misspeak” about shooting guns to pander to her audience? If we are not going to talk about the issues, then talk about the skeletons in both of their closets. I think overall, Obama did well considering the three on one that he had to deal with.

Posted by: Sha-vone | April 17, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Best debate ever! Real questions for a change to BOTH canidates. Hillary was just able to answer them, while Obama looked like a fool. Great work by ABC!

Posted by: tyron | April 17, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

ABC “News” is a farce. Last night’s Republican Infomercial, masquerading as The Democratic Debate, was a joke.
George clearly is out of his depth, he should be relegated to gossip columnist. Neither candidate was asked a question of any substance for over an hour. This was a total waste of time and ABC should be ashamed.

Posted by: Spencer | April 17, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

I am speechless about the questions asked by the supposedly “serious” journalists.
I am to believe that the Bosnia sniper and the ranting pastor are more important than healthcare, affordable higher education, more fair paying jobs and regaining our moral stature in the rest of the world?
Shame on you Mr. Stephanopolous and Gibson. With this kind of news organization I am glad that Britney did not get into another car incident or we would not know that the Pope is visiting us.
Here is an idea. For the next debate hook up the audience with instant “Question meter” that shows how insightful and intelligent your question is, but also gives you and electric jolt when you drop into the sewer.

Posted by: Sergio51 | April 17, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Really ugly set-up by ABC and George S….it reminded me of the old McCarthy hearings…I am sorry because I am a fan of most media, but this time I found myself agreeing with all the public nausea against the press.

Posted by: alice arlen | April 17, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Just curious if all of the kool-aid drinking comrade clintonites know that she stated to her husband that he should “screvv” his fellow Americans (white southerners). Read about it in the Huffington Post.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

I suspected something was up before the debate started — why were Chelsea and Rendell spotlighted and the rest of the audience in dim light? But I never expected such “Fox” actions from Gibson and Stephanopolous. I’m counting on the intelligent people of Pennsylvania to make the right choice based on the real issues – not the issues the media (and now including ABC!) throws our way.

Posted by: Debbie | April 17, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

don tufts wrote “to all obamaites the focus groups of undecided voters at the debate went to clinton 51% obama 23% and tie 21% so spin it all you like as the focus groups are the true measure not online polls that obamaites with no responsibilites can take the time during the day to vote on.”
Wher did you get that information? I’m definitely calling shinnanigans unless you can provide a link. You are spreading unsubstantiated untruths. Obama 08′

Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Guess who was the Real Loser during ABC’s Democratic Presidential “Debate” last night? ABC, that’s who! Shame on You! If you’re going to put a Presidential candidate – namely, Barack Obama – on trial, please call your program what it is – a Trial – so that I won’t waste my time waiting for a debate. How dare you insult the American public by indulging in minutia and gutter issues when there are so many really pressing issues that need to be addressed! Bitter? Me, Bitter? Bitter isn’t a strong enough word. I’m Outraged.
And I just watched ABC for the last time.

Posted by: JV | April 17, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

This was shameful. This is exactly how we wound up with Bush/Cheney for 8 years. I have always liked Charlie and George, but to talk about flag pins instead of why our soldiers are dying in a Civil War in Iraq leaves me speechless.
If we voters allow this election to spin out of control again and not be about substance instead of emotion, we will get exactly the govt we deserve. Just like last time.
Let ABC know what you think, and switch over to another news channel. That is exactly what I plan on doing tonight.

Posted by: tl | April 17, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

ABC has no credibility to offer the political process after last nights dispicible hatchet job.
Despite their best efforts though, Obama will be victorious in the primary and in the general election.

Posted by: R.C | April 17, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Will someone puleeze acknowledge the sheer delusion behind claims that Obama will unite the country: he can’t even unite Dems let alone Dems, Republicans, Independents etc. And high-minded calls for debate of the “issues” are a sham: what issues are there when the minute Hillary announces a position, Obama dittoes it? Did no one catch his echo of Hillary’s criticism of Bush for ignoring civilian control of the military? or coming up with a $30 bill fund to prevent mortgage foreclosures days after Hillary proposed it, or tweaking her healthcare and economic stimulus plans? He makes sure there are virtually NO policy differences between them. Most of the press goes along with this charade. Kudos to Gibson and Stephanopoulos for having the guts to ask what all the Republican blogs are abuzz with, while Obama ingenues think Republicans could never have come up with this all on their own!!
Will-o-the-Wisp

Posted by: Will-o-the-Wisp | April 17, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Obama handled this “debate” very well, All the polls point to that. I am surprised that he kept his cool as much as he did with questions that were absolutely ridiculous.

Posted by: Andrea | April 17, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

ABC News should be ashamed by the performance last nite – not from the candidates during the debate – but by the ridiculous, amateurish and outrightly stupid questioning by Stephanoupolis. Sadly, Gibson was not far behind. What an outrageous squandering of a spectacular opportunity to make democracy in action shine. Stephanoupolis is not fit to clean toilets – what an idiot. Thanks for remindng me why I haven’t watched network television in two decades

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Its no ones fault but Obama. He couldnt answer questions. I guess he will give a speak about the debate tomorrow. LOL… Vote for intelligence, Clinton 08!

Posted by: dimetrick | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

ABC News should be ashamed by the performance last nite – not from the candidates during the debate – but by the ridiculous, amateurish and outrightly stupid questioning by Stephanoupolis. Sadly, Gibson was not far behind. What an outrageous squandering of a spectacular opportunity to make democracy in action shine. Stephanoupolis is not fit to clean toilets – what an idiot. Thanks for remindng me why I haven’t watched network television in two decades

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Fellow Obama supporters,
Barack only came out stronger. In a few more months he’ll be at the top of his strength for knocking the old man out.
We gotta thank ABC. Their trash was rewarded by the Philadelphia Daily News endorsing Barack for President today and by more superdelegates choosing his side.
Well done, ABC!

Posted by: mobird | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Yesterday’s debate was terrible. ABC did a horrible job with no discussion of issues. I guess they wanted to make it clear to viewers why they lag so far behind in cable news’ ratings. Shameful.

Posted by: Jeff Stoffa | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

This serious-waste-of-time debate was the last for me. I don’t care if the Democrats have anymore. I’m done. The only ones I will be watching from now on will be in the general election between John McCain and the Democrat nominee.

Posted by: Kismet | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Who cares about Rev. Wright?! He says crazy things that reflect his angry background. So what! Obama doesn’t say those things. Obama isn’t hateful. So why are we wasting so much time and effort on Rev. Wright? He doesn’t deserve this much attention! So stop giving it to him! It doesn’t matter why Obama stayed in that church. Rev. Wright is no longer at the church. Rev. Wright is not Obama’s spiritual advisor. Rev. Wright is not making policy decisions. SO, CAN WE TALK ABOUT STUFF THAT REALLY MATTERS?!

Posted by: Lorna | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Despicable performance by Charlie, George and ABC News. CMON!! Do you really take us all for such idiots? Do you think we care more about comments that are not even newsworthy anymore than about real issues like Iraq, our crumbling economy and how we are going to turn this country around? Im happy Obama literally “brushed off” the debate – onward! BTW to all the angry anti-Obama posts on this chain – can we talk about how hard the world would come down on Obama and demand he pull out of this campaign if he were in H.R.Clinton’s shoes and had her delegate numbers? Wake Up! Are your criticisms real or are you racists?

Posted by: FrustratedMom | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

If Obama thinks this debate was a preview of what’s coming this fall then he had better get his act together, because he blew this one big time.

Posted by: rplat | April 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

This was the most biased debate I’ve seen. Obama was under attack from Hillary and the commentators on “issues” which are a distraction from the real problems which desperately need our attention like the war, the economy, the environment, education, NAFTA, etc etc etc. Why was Hillary not questioned about lying to America about sniper fire, the Clinton financial ties to Columbia, or why she is determined to be McCain’s best friend and further the republican cause. How many times did we have to see Chelsea’s face last night? What has happened to the media in this country? I’m bitter.

Posted by: ellen Gager | April 17, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

This was the worst I have ever seen ABC anchorman you blew it. Mr. Charlie Gibson and Mr. George What happen to the Economie, rather than personal attack question that you guy where so much interest about was that to help ABC NEWS or the people of America Embarrasing.

Posted by: Benjamin Mangomo | April 17, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

The most unfair debate I have ever seen.From all the blogs I have seen except this one even Hillary fans beleive so, very unamerican debate unfourtunetly I know those broadcasters could of found more stuff to bring up on Hillary to make it fair, Barack was right when he said it was a gotcha debate instead of issues such as gas,economics,schooling,health care.
Obama 08

Posted by: Libra#1 | April 17, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Last night was a high tech lynching….not a debate. ABC should be ashamed. Through it all however Obama still showed that he is the best person to take the oath in January ’09.

Posted by: bernj | April 17, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Obama will never be President. He’s too liberal, and American is too conservative.

Posted by: John | April 17, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

A “rough performance” by Obama? That’s hilarious coming from an ABC reporter. ABC has zero credibility to discuss the debate from last night. Pathetic.

Posted by: acey4utosay | April 17, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Wow, Obama and his groupies can’t keep their composure through a few semi-tough questions from usually-softball-leftie ABC News?
Oh my oh my oh my!
Can you say:
“The Junior Senator from Illinois is Not Ready for the Big Leagues”?
What, oh what, will they do when the Rebublican Attack Machine gets hold of Obama?

Posted by: JondDo369 | April 17, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

ABC has become a subsidiary of Fox network, again!
Gibson and Steph ought to retire to the gossip columns of a third rate newspaper, which would be a step up from this third rate network. Obama can handle it, kids!

Posted by: Robert Feragen | April 17, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Obama runs back to NC to face a black crowd today. Poor baby’s ego needed stroking.

Posted by: chasseur | April 17, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Wednesday’s “debate,” and I use that term very loosely, demonstrated the integrity of Senator Obama as he tried to redirect the questioning to issues our next President will face in January. He survived the three way character attack admirably. If the media must attack character, why didn’t Charlie and George ask Senator Clinton what she did or did not do to shape the personnel and purchasing practices of the Walmart Corporation where she sat on the board of directors for 8 years? Why didn’t they ask her why her husband accepted $800,000 from the Colombians to promote another NAFTA fiasco? Why didn’t they ask her about her about her advisor, Mark Penn, who was on her payroll at the same time he was on the Colombian payroll for the same “free” trade agreement?

Posted by: Tony | April 17, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Obama expressed annoyance at the debate — “It was 45 minutes until we started talking about a single issue that matters to the American people,” he said — and said he just had to “let it kind of …” as he brushed off his suit shoulder.
Good Lord, maybe some folks think the most important single issue that matters to the American people is just what kind of person we are electing to the Presidency

Posted by: Ironmike | April 17, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

The debate had no substance and neglected to address any of the issues people actually care about. What about the environment, education, the price of gas and groceries, health care???
Apparently ABC was too busy reading talking points from Sean Hannity to allow time for real debate.

Posted by: KFitz | April 17, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

this was the dumbest debate I will never tune in to charlie and george again

Posted by: J-Lo | April 17, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Shame on you, ABC, for your stupid and rude questions that intelligent people have no interest in!

Posted by: upset viewer | April 17, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

GW and DC were watching the slugfest in the Whitehouse Media Room and absolutely howling with laughter. Every time Clinton or Obama would land a solid one, DC would pump his ‘air shotgun’ and point it at the victim, GW would hit the floor laughing! Tears flowing out of their eyes! Back hurting because they were laughing so hard!
I’ve seen episodes of the Three Stoges that weren’t as funny as this brew ha ha! Two crooks standing there calling each other corrupt! The only thing missing was Howard Cosell.
Best debate I have ever, ever, ever seen! Hillary and Obama, keep up the good work and rip each others guts out and it will be smooth sailing for Johnny Mac.

Posted by: Rabid_Repulican | April 17, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Disappointed — first 40 or more minutes just trivia. Surprised at both ABCers. Let’s hear real issues and not trivia. I don’t wear a flagr on my lapel either but fly one every holiday. So what!

Posted by: JimD | April 17, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Barry H. Obama, you need to look no farther than your own mirror come August when you lose the nomination. No need to blame the Clintons. Their deepest attacks were MAKING LOVE TO YOU compared to what the GOP WOULD HAVE DONE TO YOU.
Of course, since they’ve been the ones ACTUALLY MAKING LOVE to you all this time, especially the MSM pundits, you foolishly thought that honeymoon would go on forever and that the Clinton’s were your enemy.
That’s the difference between you and the Clintons, Barry; they always saw you not as a threat, but PRACTICE for the GOP, making them stronger.
You’ve always seen them as flies to be swatted aside in the “god-given” nomination and Presidency Karl Rove promised you.
Not gonna happen, Barry. Not in this year, and as you wallow in even more anger, resentment, and obvious Clinton hate, perhaps it’s for the best IT WON’T EVER HAPPEN AT ALL.
That’s another essential difference between you and Hillary Clinton; she actually LIKES her opponents, while you are the most hate-filled person I’ve ever seen run for public office next to George W. Bush. And it’s THAT hate that most of ObamaNation is plugging into and reflecting, no matter how many wors you speak to the contrary. That’s something ELSE you have deeply in common with George W. Bush.
Thank you for NOT showing anything a bit otherwise last night.

Posted by: xbjllb | April 17, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

FIRE PETER SALINGER, director of Election Coverage
George S. has a conflict of interest. Carville had to sit out of the CNN debate, George should have sat out here. in his place maybe we would have had someone with REAL questions that affect REAL people.

Posted by: Vonda | April 17, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Charlie, I, as well as my family, thought you did an excellent job as moderator of the debate last night. In fact, I thought you and George did the best job of anyone so far. The questions you asked Hillary were just as tough as the ones you asked Obama. I thought the capital gains tax question was very good. In fact, I was hoping that question would be asked.
To be honest, I think it is so sad for our country that the far left wing of the party is taking control. I’m a conservative, but I don’t always agree with them. However, I thought all your questions were very good.
Also, I would like to add that you are doing an excellent job on World News Tonight, but Good Morning America has never been the same since you left. You and Diane were such a good twosome.

Posted by: shirley eckerd | April 17, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

I don’t watch Fox News because of their biased political coverage. After last night’s debate, I would consider doing the same for ABC News. There are plenty of other places to get my news, and ABC has seriously wounded its credibility with this customer.

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

ABC has seriously underestimated the reason Americans watch a Presidential debate…it isn’t to rehash tabloid material that has been covered for weeks now…we want to hear the issues discussed! I hope that any debates in the Presidential contest between Senator Obama(who will win the nomination) and Senator McCain will be hosted by the League of Women Voters and not by the so called news orgainizations of today’s pitiful media outlets.

Posted by: Lnstarmom | April 17, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

So Granny, 45 minutes of Clinton gravedigging by ABC would be just fine for you in the next debate? How about questions about Peter Paul? Norman Hsu? Maybe even throw one in about Vince Foster or Abu Dhabi merchants. Heck they didn’t even touch Mark Penn or Caftagate! Lets spend 1/2 of the next debate talking about that, with one cursory question for Obama about ‘bitter’ again. Fair, right? Because thats what happened to Obama.
You Clinton supporters are either willfully ignorant or just plain stupid–there IS a difference in asking Clinton to account for her vote on a bill and asking a US Senator to prove he’s patriotic or to prove his devotion to his faith. One question is politics, the other is personal. A few personal questions is OK, but pre-empting actual issues like health care and the economy to talk about whether or not Obama is patriotic or wears a flag pin, smacks of yellow journalism and gotcha politics. Get real Clinton supporters.

Posted by: Byron | April 17, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

GW and DC were watching the slugfest in the Whitehouse Media Room and absolutely howling with laughter. Every time Clinton or Obama would land a solid one, DC would pump his ‘air shotgun’ and point it at the victim, GW would hit the floor laughing! Tears flowing out of their eyes! Back hurting because they were laughing so hard!
I’ve seen episodes of the Three Stooges that weren’t as funny as this brew ha ha! Two crooks standing there calling each other corrupt! The only thing missing was Howard Cosell.
Best debate I have ever, ever, ever seen! Hillary and Obama, keep up the good work and rip each others guts out and it will be smooth sailing for Johnny Mac.

Posted by: Rabid_Republican | April 17, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

If he isn’t the single most arrogant human being on the face of God’s green earth, then someone, please point that person out.

Posted by: beebop | April 17, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

I am glad Obama doesn’t walk out of a room just because he here something he does not like. As President, these occasions will come up over and over again. Do we want him walking out? He will listen, communicate and solve. And yes, we pray everyday and when hard times hit, we want to know God may be a little closer…Hum…clinging. Why is that word so frightening to some? We cling to our parents, children and all things we love. Look up the definition: adhere, stick together, hold fast by or as by embracing.
Hilary said you get to choose, friends, pastor, etc….I choose Senator Obama.

Posted by: Kathy | April 17, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

I am outraged that the moderators from ABC “News” (and I use that term loosely) wasted half the debate talking about trivial issues rather than substantive issues such as getting out of Iraq, high gas and utility prices, the mortgage mess, and other economic issues. If they host another debate, I’m not watching, nor will I bother watching their “newscasts”. I hope the rest of the country is as sick and tired, angry and bitter, as I am about trivializing the issues of this election.

Posted by: Bob A. | April 17, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

i am rather still on the fence as to w/candidate to support. I am very clear though, that i will stop watching abc news. I was outraged that the hosts of last night’s debate drove almost half of the time towards small and petty “gotta” questions. Listten up, we-the citizens-want to hear about ISSUES!
the hosts seemed smug in their opportunity to play to the worst in americvan politics.
shame on abc news, the hosts and producer.

Posted by: mario cooper | April 17, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

This debate, as awful and demeaning as it was, again showed me a side of Hillary Clinton that I really don’t care for. (Making demeaning and mocking comments.) And it showed me a side of Barack Obama that I do like. Calmness under pressure. He tried, for the most part, to be respectful (he could have really gone after Hillary on several issues, especially the one where she admitted she lied), but instead he tried to bring the subject back to real issues. There was nothing wrong with his answers. The others just kept bringing up the same old, same old irrelevant attacks and really fumbled the ball. Not much that was meaningful was discussed.
After the debacle last night, I’ve changed my mind. I intend to vote for Sen. Obama.

Posted by: Karl | April 17, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Watching last night’s debate, I was very pleased with Hillary Clinton’s composure and knowledge, generated from her experience and just how in touch she is with our Country’s need’s. It would have been more of an advange for the voters, if the question’s were more focused on main issues.
I would like to ask the University Professor “Hopeful” with regard to his/her posting herein, is this election suppose to prove or show just how anti racial we are, so we should vote to that agenda? if so, if we thought we are in trouble now from the last 8 years leadership – do I feel doom?? I am more worried about the person we send to the whitehouse, and the job they will do that needs doing!
And Heaven help us if the Media dosen’t stop trying to brain wash the viewer into thier way of thinking or going for that News Award. Sick of it!!!

Posted by: Katie | April 17, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

The ABC moderating team of Stephanopoulos & Gibson was a disgrace to their profession and an insult to the public and the format of moderating a political debate. Last night’s debate was not a debate at all – it was a tabloid exposé off gossipy fodder. I was appalled at the lack of urgent and serious issues discussed. Shame on you George S. you should know better- Despicable! Charlie G. – since when are you so manipulative -–your questions were inappropriate and often trivial. And ABC – you are a powerful network who simply adhered to a cheap and distasteful Murdoch-esque format for the ratings – all 11 million of us might as well have been watching Fox’s American Idol. I hope your sponsors and bean counters are happy – but know that your viewing public is disgusted!

Posted by: Rebecca B. | April 17, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

I am amazed at how many people posting comments here actually believe that flag pins, irrelevent associations, and comments taken out of context are the criteria we should use when choosing the next president of the United States.
It certainly explains how someone as morally deficient and unintelligent as George Bush was able to win the last two elections.
Whether a Clinton, Obama, or McCain supporter, the People need to wake up to the fact that they’re being manipulated and dumbed down by the corporate-owned media.
Stop being sheep and open your eyes and minds to the truth and facts – tune out and turn off corporate-controlled news sources!

Posted by: Sojourner | April 17, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

i have never seen any Fraud as brilliant as obama. he said something today then make a speech about it tomorrow. “brush off”? hah. It was actually quite satisfying to see him get hammer for the first time. Not only that he couldn’t handled it, his supporters rioted the blogs right after the debate. They have seemed to forget when hillary was being assaulted (literally) by Tim Russert. obama really is a little boy who cannot handle the real world. He has been babied by the media up until this point. He cannot answer the questions and said that these are not important. Well, I can tell you that i’ll give you a million bucks. Are you going to believe me? of course No. First you have to find out if I have the money and second, base on what that make you think i’m going to give you the money. New kind of politics? what a joke.
Still cannot believe my Iowans fellows voted for obama and huckabee.

Posted by: iowa | April 17, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Wonderful job last night guys! Keep up the good work!

Posted by: Mack | April 17, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

So you see ABC, even after sending your best hatchet men they had a negative on your station and not Obama. George said the debate is about experience, character, and credibility…Seems like ABC NEWS failed on all fronts. What they should have done last night…attend the Correspondence Dinner with ther boys and girls who represent the media …you know joke around, be a joke…Because that’s what you think about Hardworking Americans… A joke when we talk about the economy…A joke for those who loose their job…A joke for those who have no insurance or medical insurance have bankrupte their family…A joke for those who need quality education and the ability to pay for it…A joke we are in Iraq and the media laid down and was trampled over. You Failed Last Night…Most Americans believe the Media is “Nothing but A Piece of Junk!”

Posted by: Ronald a Liberal | April 17, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

SLAM DUNK 4 CLINTON….
INDIANA VOTING HILLARY !

Posted by: George | April 17, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

If Obama can’t handle this, he’ll never be able to handle the republicans. He should just man up and just admit he had a bad night, no one is perfect, but to play this wounded victim role is really unattractive and unbecoming of a leader. Do your history, this is a picnic compare to the founding fathers. The job of President is tough and he needs to stop whining.

Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | April 17, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Last nites debate was a clarification of what is wrong with our media,not our candidates. The fact that the debate was so easily manipulated should upset everyone. ABC—shame on you.

Posted by: patt | April 17, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I find it telling that Obama supporters cry foul when Obama receives the same treatment from the media as the other candidates. If Obama does not win the nomination at the Democratic Convention, can we expect insurrection from Obama supporters? Sorry, but you can’t use Affirmative Action to get into the White House like you can to get into Harvard.

Posted by: James | April 17, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I keep hearing that Obama’s not answering the tough questions. Did he not have a speech on race and made it clear that Rev Wrights comments were not his and he distanced himself from those remarks?
I think he has answered the tough questions. I think the problem is many people don’t like his response or answers but he has clearly answered them. I don’t know how else he can an respond to the same questions differently over and over again.

Posted by: someguy | April 17, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

The more I think about the debate last night, the more I am displeased I am with ABC. I cannot believe how both Charlie and George acted and delivered their rumor mill/scandal sheet questions to both candidates. They know better that to spend 45 minutes on such trival staff. Just as a quality control check, I was able to hear this debate again on NPR this afternoon, and I got mad all over again. What where they thinking? And what were you people thinking?

Posted by: stephen kadar jr | April 17, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Gotcha!!!!
George and Charlie should be ashamed. They treated this debate like a WWF telecast. H vs. O!!! Where were the issues? What the heck was with the flag question? I am never watching ABC news again. They are just corporate trash.

Posted by: Jeff | April 17, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Tough debate indeed. A dissapointment. 52 wasted minutes of not discussing important issues that affect Pensylvanians. Explanation from ABC anchor is that their policy difference is so liitle and we only have to discuss trivia or gotcha issues. If that is the case, I could have simply watch the daily news rather than spent precious time driving home to watch that unbelievable debate.

Posted by: James | April 17, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I just do not understand how you debate personal attacks. To ask Senator Obama a question about one of the “hot issues” then Charlie Gibson turns to Sen Clinton for a response. Why? ABC, you certainly took the low road last night, with Hillary leading the way.

Posted by: Maria | April 17, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I think ABC did a wonderful job last night. You Obama folks are mad because he lost that debate. He showed he was very
arrogant and I think most people watching see it the same way I do. He has no substance at all and how he has gotten this far is beyond me. I think he will lose now with all the krap coming out about him in the last month. If not McCain will slaughter him in November.

Posted by: barefootboy9 | April 17, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Give me one question that you would not ask a future president of our country that was asked yesterday?
They did not ask what color panty you wear, they asked questions about character and that is very important.
Obama could not answer them properly. When some character questions were asked to Hillary she has answered. She also apologized for the mistake that was done by her regarding Bosnia. Obama would not apologize .. a show of arrogrance.

Posted by: JACK | April 17, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Wonderful clip of Obama in Raleigh. Hillary is simply out of control at this point and it’s a horror to witness. I hope she stands down soon.

Posted by: DN | April 17, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I see the Obama fan sites Daily Kos, Huffington Post and left wing blogs mobilized their minions to write and chastize ABC for having the audacity to ask questions of their Savior. The all Powerful KOS put out ABC’s phone number to call and the cattle at his site prodded to write whiny pity party wailings came stampeding to your site pretending to be the average joe. Nice try. You Obamabots are hilarious…and transparent. Sorry your Messiah doesn’t think he should be questioned at all. ABC you have sinned against their Savior and the almighty and powerful KOS has sent the locusts upon you.

Posted by: zeezeetrampr | April 17, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Thanks a bunch to George and Charlie for not being afraid to be jouarnalists and not being afraid to question the Obama brand! Both of you have offered a great service to your viewers.
It is very refreshing to see ABC being the only network who dares to question the allegedly “transparent,” “one of a kind,” “uniter” on his personal choices, political associations, the queality of his past judgements especially when his most frequently used marketing hype against Clinton up until the Wright controversy was that his judgements were “superior” to Clinton’s.
This debate highlighted that Senator Obama would do very well as long as no one questions him on his flaws.

Posted by: Thom Knight | April 17, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

i am disappointed with abc for setting a format that precluded discussion of the issues, yes the candidates personalities are important but not the personality of everyone with whom they have had contact with in the past 20 years. this kind of dog and pony show is to be expected on foxy news but for it to appear on abc is a big big let down.

Posted by: peter falvey | April 17, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

How dare ABC ask the questions that everyone has been talking about.
They’re suppose to save the tabloid questions for the republicans!
How dare they bring up the latest gaffes!!

Posted by: Jo | April 17, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

The Obama fans make me laugh! It is amazing how offended they get when someone asks their idiot the tough questions! The media has been all over Clinton since this campaign began and now when they are asking the questions that should have been asked months ago they are out of line for doing it. Why are you so affraid of these questions? They are a serious concern to many voters. It’s as if we have no right to question this man. It is a total double standard. And if people don’t think this guy is an arrogant, egotistical creep after his ‘brush-off’ and the comments about small town America I hold no hope for the stupid people in this country.
I guess we have to take it easy on poor wittle Obama while he sucks his thumb. He can’t handle the pressure. I can’t wait until the GOP gets a hold of him. He thinks it’s tough now! HA!

Posted by: Wells747 | April 17, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

So for all of you Obama supporters that are now saying ABC is pro Obama, since you have become so astute at picking up on news agencies’ biases, are you willing to conceded that MSNBC and CNN have been going out of their way and going overboard promoting Obama?
Anyone?

Posted by: Kent | April 17, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Lapel pins? Get a life…Gibson and Stephanopolous were disgraceful last night. If this is how they choose to waste my time on national television they should be banned from hosting any future debates. The behaved like a couple of juvenile purveyors of gossip. Next time lets get someone who can ask some serious meaningful questions for the duration of the event.

Posted by: jaytee | April 17, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

I truly hope that ABC and all other news outlets takes a few moments to reflect on the shoddy, sensationalist quality of the moderators’ questions. Certainly there are people who care about flag lapels and the like, but those concerns are fanned by the irrational and overblown media fixation on them. Let’s put a stop to this nonsense. Please!

Posted by: Pogonip | April 17, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

I think ABC should call both of these
two reporters in and after this bias
interegation instead of finding out
how they would deal with more issues they would rather rehash everything we have heard before… sad commentary.
can’t expect much from either of these two that are into themselves more than the public…. they need a cut in pay.
unfortuneately they turned this over to
ABC, hopefully that doesn’t happen again.
I think anyone that tuned in so the bias these two insulting loosers had to say.
Well when this is all said and done
If I were either candidate I wouldn’t appear on ABC….
I hope this is the last of any coverage by ABC.

Posted by: George Carr | April 17, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

1st, and only, time on ABC’s web-site. They may be happy they’re getting so much attention; but I feel confident that there are many such as myself that will not bother to take this network seriously again. The best remedy for ABC is to give them the benign neglect they deserve after that disastorously moderated debate.

Posted by: Brad | April 17, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

I watched the debate with a lot of interest. Charlie and George acted like reporter’s for a scandal sheet in Hollywood! 45 minutes into the debate, they finally started asking questions of substance. Then at the end of the debate Charlie asked an “associate clown” to give us his perception of the two partcipants. He basically said Hillary had won and Obama had a lot of questions to answer. A 10-15 second reply to a 90 minute debate? His lack of impartial reporting made me angry.
ABC should be ashamed of the 3 stooges who represented them.

Posted by: Jack Lee | April 17, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

ZeeZee,
Interesting reaction by the Kos Mafia. I logged in over there and dug in somewhat, and found a bit of fear and trembling about Obama’s performance by some professed Obama supporters.
Bittergate was like the first rumble in China Syndrome.
========================================
Obama — Elite? Bitter?
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 17, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Granny, is that the best you have for me? No, I didn’t miss the last debates. No, Obama is not weak, in fact, he was the ONLY candidate amongst the two that actually took the moderators to task for wasting the time of the voters with nonsense issues like Bosnia and Bittergate. Hillary simply reveled in the fact that the media was now ganging up on Obama when she thought SHE was the victim. I’d rather have a honest, intelligent and polite politician than one who lies and revels in payback. This isn’t about Democrats winning or Hillary winning its about AMERICA winning. That’s why I’m voting OBAMA

Posted by: Byron | April 17, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

The really pathetic thing is that big news conglomerates like ABC are the first to condescend to voters and politicians alike for lowering the bar of political discourse in this country… Failing to recognize their own significant duplicity in that reality.
One full hour of tabloid, gottcha, meaningless questions that we’ve been subjected to ad nauseum for weeks upon weeks now. Shame on you!

Posted by: mickyg | April 17, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

that was not a debate. It was a tabloid

Posted by: Diane | April 17, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

ABC News should be ashamed of themselves for focusing their debate on People Magazine nonsense. It’s that kind of sorry excuse for journalism that allowed Bush & Friends to drag us into Iraq.

Posted by: Disgusted Viewer | April 17, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Hey George–Still on the Clinton payroll, aren’t you?
Hey Charlie–The debate was supposed to be between the candidates, not between you and Obama. Are you supposed to be a journalist? Hard to tell.
Hey both of you–Who cares about flag pins and whether or not Rev. Wright loves America more than Obama??????????? No one with half a brain. By the way, Hillary wasn’t wearing a flag pin–OMG, does she hate America????????? Why didn’t you ask Obama about his middle name? Slipping, fellas. . . I’ve had it with ABC “News”.

Posted by: Nancy | April 17, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Are you kidding me ABC?! This was not a “debate,” but rather an inquisition! To harp on a flag pin & who their acquaintances might be is hardly worth the people’s time! What’s wrong with the democrats? Here they stand with the opportunity to make big changes for the future of this nation & they wish to waste this opportunity to get in front of the people & interrrogate about nonsense, instead of dealing with our major issues! Emberassing for ABC! It’s obvious which candidate ABC is for!

Posted by: Loren | April 17, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

I am deeply disappointed for that farce of a debate last night! What happened to real questions that are relevant in a Presidential campaign? Are flag pins REALLY going to put food on our table? Regardless of which candidate one supports, the American public deserves better than that shameful moderation we were subjected to last night. Obama is 100% right on this point…if all we care about are gaffes, clothing attire, holding candidates responsible for what OTHER people do – then we will deserve exactly more or worse of what we have just suffered through under the Bush Administration. Shame on ABC, Charlie and George.

Posted by: Ketly Blaise Williams | April 17, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

I was shocked that ABC did such a poor job at moderating this debate. It is highly unethical to let a former Bill Clinton staff member run this debate. I thought the media was supposed to be the 4th arm of government- objective and unbiased. ABC news has lost me as a viewer after this debacle. I’d almost rather watch FOX news at this point- at least there is no pretense of objectivity with them.

Posted by: ed | April 17, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

*** IN OTHER NEWS ***
ABC has been bought out by FOX.

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

If as some of you claim this debate was about character then Senator Obama won it hands down. The exact moment was when after 40 minutes of tabloid grilling the moderators turned on Senator Clinton with questions of Bosnia. When asked to comment on that Senator Obama said, “We all make mistakes”. He had to repeat it 2xs for them to understand that he was not going to trash her. His body language gave the message of I am done w/this let’s move onto issues. They did. By his actions he demonstrated that he will not support the politics of personal destruction. Of all the people on the stage he showed the highest character.

Posted by: kismet | April 17, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

ABC did the American public and itself a disservice last night. That was pathetic and Charles Gibson just lost every thread of credibility he ever had. George Stephanopoulos has always appeared as an amateur to me. I see just about 50% of the posts agree here on the performance of the moderators. ABC you ought to take note and honestly we deserve a public apology. 40 Minutes?? What were the producers thinking??? I watched the meter as it went on and you should review it as well. I’m not angry about it, but you really hurt yourself last night.

Posted by: Darryl | April 17, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

What a missed opportunity for ABC and the candidates. Charlie and George had a golden opportunity to rise above the fray that is exhausting most people and ask specific questions about the economy, the war, etc. Every time one of them attempted to bring the conversation to a pressing issue you two took it right back to personal issues that quite frankly have been beat to death. ABC could have stood head and shoulders by asking Presidential Questions and behaved as an example for future commentators. What a waste of my time. Senator’s Obama and Clinton should have been saying shame on you.

Posted by: Judith | April 17, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Way to go ABC!! You got a new customer.
I am switching from OBNBC to ABC!!

Posted by: James | April 17, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I am deeply sadden at the bias debate organized by ABC News. In the past, I had respected the professionalism of both Charlie and George. However, now I am certain I was too generous with my opinion. Last night was clearly an effort to tell Obama because you are not just like me, I am uncomfortable and fearful of you being president. If we indeed do love our country let us remember what it stands for “we the people” and “land of the free, home of the brave. Let us remember our greatest asset in this country is our diversity of people who all don’t look alike or think alike. Thank God!

Posted by: abp | April 17, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

I would love to vote for a democrat this election year but Obama and his supporters are making it extremely difficult. For a candidate who talks about wanting to change the tone of politics and continues to rail about the ‘same old political games’. He sure is willing to play them. Let’s be honest folks he is playing the same games. He implied in one debate his association to Tony Rezko was 5 hours of billable legal work which was false. He distorts where he gets his money and support from. If you listen to him it’s just the regular people which is not accurate He released his lastest tax returns last night. Seems he only made 4.4 million last year. I haven’t seen that in a single news cycle from any of the web sites who blasted the Clinton’s for making money. How does Obama get off critizing Clinton for making money when he knows full well how much he earned himself. So give me a break. If you prefer Obama that is your choice but don’t act like he is innocent and above board about everything he does or says.

Posted by: Debbie | April 17, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Jack,
Nice one! Usually it takes at least 3 posts to compare Obama/Hillary/McCain/Bush to Hitler. Tell me, could you possibly spin it so Obama is like Stalin next time? It helps Bill Kristol’s arguments.

Posted by: Byron | April 17, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Bad show (literally & figuratively) ABC! Fire George and hope Charles gets his act together. I will be watching ABC news for the last time this evening to catch Charle’s apology to the American public.

Posted by: Al | April 17, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Charlie, what happened? I know that you are better than that. Your performance was not fair to either candidate, but the worst part is that you let down your fans. You let me down last night…so dissapoiting.
George, today you can only blame yourself for the black eye to your efforts to be taken as a serious news journalist.
I truly hope neither of you dismiss our comments as if only politically inspired–mine are not. Your performance last night really was a shame and it can only be worse if either of you refuse to see that you came out as the debate’s losers.

Posted by: marilia | April 17, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

jaxhertz -Are you even a registerd Dem?? I support both candidates who oppose this war. I don’t care who gets the nod but all I know is that the war has gone on far too long and the economy is weak. Thats my only concern as an American. I hope your concern is hoping for a party member downfall? Most of you should encourage unity in the party because regardless of the candidate we will need each other to beat the republican nominee.

Posted by: someguy | April 17, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Obama, a cry baby??!!
Hillary in the ONLY presidental candidate that has ACTUALLY CRIED on the campaign trail.

Posted by: common sense | April 17, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

All the leftwing blogs that support Hillary thought it was a GREAT debate.
ABC has some new fans. Hillary supporters and conservatives who are sick of the Obama worship.
Way to go ABC!!

Posted by: Jo | April 17, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

I don’t know if this is the proper venue to lodge a serious complaint, but I can’t find anywhere better. The debate last night was a shameful exhibition of how the news media manufactures issues in order to divert real debate about the issues voters are truly concerned about. We are in a futile war, our economy is a shambles, and, I think closest to home for most of us, we are worried sick about what we’ll do if we ever need serious medical care.

Posted by: Ira Stone | April 17, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Barack Obama is beginning to disturb me. He is always touting how he will change all things political for the better. No one individual could even began to do that in 8 years and with all his bravado in saying that no one in washinton knows anything other than himself, he will certainly find himself isolated and frustrated. I believe Mr. Obama is not concerned so much with the details, as he is with becoming president. He is suprememly egotistical and lives in and for the moment. He is that rare individual that turns gradually into a self deluded dictator. Like all social dictators he has that inexplicable ability to tap into the national zeitgeist of discontent. And like them one day he will reckon with the consequences of unleashing the forces of social chaos.The political failures of our government has made our society ripe for his kind of individual. I know Mr. Obama does not mean harm which makes him the most dangerous type of politician. Ultimately he can see himself doing no wrong or nor can his followers.As an African American who grew up and become successful I can say that elitism is not a result of social up bringing but it is a quality of character. Hitler came from the dregs of society and yet he was elitist in a way that I only now see occuring with Mr. Obama. But I don’t believe it’s too late and to be honest the fundamentals on which America is built will overcome Mr. Obama should he go further down this dark path. This replublic will outlast him and his fanatical followers.

Posted by: msewell35 | April 17, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

ABC’s performance confirmed – there is no sense for more debate.
I do not think Obama will ever agreed to debate on ABC.
You guys there- you are not to be trusted.
And if someone was there elitist – both mediators.
With poor knowledge of a subject asking just firing developing gossips.
Shame on you.

Posted by: Linda,Fl | April 17, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Shame on you ABC. Shame on you.

Posted by: jaime | April 17, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Barack Obama is beginning to disturb me. He is always touting how he will change all things political for the better. No one individual could even began to do that in 8 years and with all his bravado in saying that no one in washinton knows anything other than himself, he will certainly find himself isolated and frustrated. I believe Mr. Obama is not concerned so much with the details, as he is with becoming president. He is suprememly egotistical and lives in and for the moment. He is that rare individual that turns gradually into a self deluded dictator. Like all social dictators he has that inexplicable ability to tap into the national zeitgeist of discontent. And like them one day he will reckon with the consequences of unleashing the forces of social chaos.The political failures of our government has made our society ripe for his kind of individual. I know Mr. Obama does not mean harm which makes him the most dangerous type of politician. Ultimately he can see himself doing no wrong or nor can his followers.As an African American who grew up and become successful I can say that elitism is not a result of social up bringing but it is a quality of character. Hitler came from the dregs of society and yet he was elitist in a way that I only now see occuring with Mr. Obama. But I don’t believe it’s too late and to be honest the fundamentals on which America is built will overcome Mr. Obama should he go further down this dark path. This replublic will outlast him and his fanatical followers.

Posted by: msewell35 | April 17, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

“All the leftwing blogs that support Hillary thought it was a GREAT debate”
All 4 of them?

Posted by: Byron | April 17, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

The Obama supporters are becoming very, very scary people. Their devotion and Praise Be Him, damn any naysayer attitude is becoming very frightening. Some of them are going to need some serious counseling come November when they finally realize he does not walk on water and there are actually many people in the real world that find him to be a very weak candidate.

Posted by: Pete | April 17, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Here are some questions that Charlie and George forgot to ask the candidates:
5. Should starlets be forbidden to go out in public without underwear?
4. How many times should people be allowed to go into rehab before stopping all reporting.
3. Should the TSA improve the country’s security by banning all personal piercing?
2. Is it an unfair advantage for females candidates to show cleavage?
1. Senator Obama do you wear briefs of boxers?

Posted by: Sergio51 | April 17, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

I have a Hillary sign in my front yard and I was disappointed in her last night. George and Charlie asked the most ludicrous questions and she followed their lead. Obama continually tried to talk about the issues and those three continually kept talking about the CRAP. I don’t care who he’s friends with. I don’t care. I want to hear the issues. That “debate” last night was a disgrace. Obama won in my opinion. Right now, I don’t know what I’m going to do on Tuesday. I thought I did but I was just so disappointed in Hillary last night and I really liked what Obama had to say. It’s back to their websites for me.

Posted by: Shan | April 17, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Of course the Obama Fan Base is going to be upset when their messiah is asked tough questions. The public has always heard a murmer about William Ayers, but no mediator dared to ask Obama about him till yesterday.
Good job abc, for realizing that in November, these are the issues Obama will not be able to defend properly.

Posted by: michelle | April 17, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

All one has to do to HONESTLY decide between the candidates, is to look at how each treats the other while they’re speaking. Hillary sits there with a blank but interested face, watching and LISTENING to Obama the entire time. Kind of the way a Vice President should treat their President. Even Cheney can’t bring himself to treat Bush the Idiot that way, scowling nonstop.
As Hillary speaks though, Obama looks down, looks all around, squirms like a child listening to his teacher giving a bad report to his parents or like OJ listening to damning testimony, looks angry, looks irritated, looks like he wishes he were a million miles away, looks like every word out of Hillary’s mouth is meaningless, and when he does look at Hillary, the disgust and hatred is obvious. It would KILL his lordship to EVER smile at her.
And it’s been ever thus since the VERY FIRST DEBATE between the two on a one-to-one basis.
THAT is why Barry H. Obama will NEVER be President, because he doesn’t have what it takes to even be a good VICE President.
And what it takes is RESPECT. Barry H. Obama doesn’t have a shred of respect for anyone, BUT the GOP. The GOP, he has plenty of respect for.
Because he owes them EVERYTHING HE IS.

Posted by: xbjllb | April 17, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

msewell35 , you show symptoms of a nervous break down…CHILL OUT! things will be fine…the age of paranoia will be over.

Posted by: peace 4 u | April 17, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Yes, rush to MSNBC where Obama love trickles down their legs. You’ll be happier there.
Meanwhile ABC plays objective. And you can’t stand it.

Posted by: Jo | April 17, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Obama handled last night with class. I wouldn’t say he won the debate because he was on defense the entire time. But he didn’t lose. ABC lost. I would have expected that type of hit job from Fox News however I really expected more from ABC. That debate will go down in history as a low point in American media. Georgie and Gibby went to far and in turn I think might have actually helped Barack.

Posted by: Alex | April 17, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

I wish the MSN broke the news of Obama’s pastor and rezco before Jan. We would not be seeing this day.
Shame on the media to wait till now to expose Obama’s character.

Posted by: JACK | April 17, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

The 2 “journalists” were completely incompetent in their questions. I would recommend that they try to remember what is important to the average citizen. I care about the economy, the WAR and health care. They wasted 45 minutes. Who is pulling those puppet strings? Get off the stage if you can’t ask pertinent questions.

Posted by: koala bear | April 17, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

The debate was one-sided and unfair. I was very, very disappointed with Gibson and George. The debate was straight out of the National Enquirer. What about real issues? I guess that’s why we’re going to get another term of George W Bush aka McCain. The world is truly laughing at us. Brian Williams true journalist.

Posted by: trina | April 17, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

This was the best debate ever!
This is the first time I have had to see Senator Obama ask questions.
Thank God for fairness.
It was about time.
Thank you ABC.

Posted by: Alice from NJ | April 17, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Judging from the style of the dabate last night, seems ABC is now an affiliate of FOX news? Was there a merger between the two?

Posted by: Richard | April 17, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

This debate was typical of the mindless sillyness that dominates our airways today disquised at “news”. George and Gibson should leave journalism and get a Jerry Springer type talk show to better showcase their talent. We have serious problems in this country and silly distractions from the real issues is what resulted in G.Bush getting in office. But I realize there are a lot of stupid people and I guess stupid people need a leader too.

Posted by: Valerie | April 17, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Thanks to ABC for wasting an hour of my time last night while your reporters proved ABC once again, the lightweight of news.
This embarrassing display of who knew whom 40 years ago and who wears flag pins, all by suppposedly bright – but really only rude (how many interruptions?) – reporters, reflects how shallow our national debates have become.
This misunderstanding of what is important is how we got into Iraq in the first place: major news shows doing no meaningful analysis or even asking good questions, only following what they think will sell to people they hold in contempt as stupid. To the director on ABC News who defended the idiocy on the grounds that “character matters”: only the question of lying had to do with character. Try getting some character youself and stop cheapening an important political process.

Posted by: Jay Carson | April 17, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

It is been the History of this Nation, to make people of Color fight for equal rights. Why did do black men have to fight in order to get the respect to lead?? What in the Hell is wrong with SOME, of our White Brothers and Sister?

Posted by: Rashid, Columbus , Ohio | April 17, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

He was “brushing off” all the tabloid dirt thrown at him. He had little chance to answer “real” questions given he was technically debating three people. I don’t want to hear about Flag Pins and other such nonsense. I want to hear about the real issues…
ABC should be ashamed of the way the debate was conducted. The commentators were rude, interrupting, etc.

Posted by: Rhonda | April 17, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

I’m very disappointed in ABC’s so-call presentation of a debate. I was really looking forward to a discussion on the true issues of this country and all you did was give Hillary Clinton an opportunity to continue her devisiveness. I applaud Senator Obama for his tactfulness and grace in handling your blatant discrimination against him. ABC and the two host of this debate should apologize to America for its very poor performance.

Posted by: nate | April 17, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Obama can run but he cannot hide. Obama comes up short because he is a typical lying politician first and foremost. You can get dizzy with all of the Obamabot spin being imparted to Obama’s inadequate answers. A quote comes to mind from Alexander Hamilton and nicely explains the Obamatons “Those who stand for nothing will fall for anything.”

Posted by: AZOLDTIMER | April 17, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Debate? This was Tabloid journalism at it’s worst. Stephanopolus and Gibson should lose their jobs. ABC should lose it’s Broadcasting License.

Posted by: Tom Joad | April 17, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Sluggo,
Funny you should mention being a liar. Seems Hillary admitted to being one last night and apologized. Kinda silly to then accuse Obama of being a liar when your candidate, by her own admission, is a liar. Far be it from me to question the innate hypocrisy of supporting Hillary against Barack, though.

Posted by: Byron | April 17, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

HACK HACK. Wow what a butchery. First you take Obama to the woodshed over wedge issues already addressed ad nauseum in the past for an entire 45 minutes, then you have the nerve to ask Hillary to provide a play by play of beating. Wack WAck how does this look to you Hillary? Wack Wack, still looking like a beating Hillary? Care to comment Hillary? THEN even worse Charlie turns to Hillary and suggests she has been given fewer time. WOW. But the icing on the cake is when the MODERATORS themselves do the debating!!!! The media let us down with Iraq and this entire election cycle they have used punditry to stir up a hornets nest for ratings. Made everything into infotainment. Magnified the slightest of mistakes, the smallest missteps, the most minuscule details and manufactured a whirlwind of dissent. Glad you folks got your ratings. YOUR BROADCAST is everything that is WRONG with journalism today. It may be good for your bottom line, your shareholders but to the American people you are simply a shiny thing hung up for parakeets. Good riddance to you ABC news, i will never watch you again. This has nothing to do with the candidate i support and everything to do with you typifying how low journalism has sunk. I thought FOX news was bad but you truly take the cake. HACK HACK.

Posted by: Penny K | April 17, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

What a shoddy, vile job ABC did last night. It’s shocking, really, when you consider that in 2 hours there is no way they could have adequately covered the REAL problems facing Americans–foreclosures, torture, underemployment, health care, the standing of the US abroad, among others–but ABC nonetheless chose to waste the first hour on trivialities. Americans are not dumb, ABC. You just think we are.

Posted by: girltisha | April 17, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

I was watching the clock 5, 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes before the first question. I told my wife 45 minutes they just wasted before something on important issues. You know its the “I” word Gibson and Stephanopolous are just imcopetent. I would rather see a teacher or factory worker run the debate.

Posted by: Brian | April 17, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

As a realistic (not emotional and visceral) female supporter of Sen. Clinton, I must say that the questions directed at Sen. Obama were impertinent and the lack of professionalism displayed by ABC is, without exaggeration, was quite insulting to the public and their intelligence. Most questions were way off-course. Unless media are hell-bent on sabotaging the future of this country, I think it is time for them to inject a liberal amount of professionalism and integrity into their performance.

Posted by: american woman | April 17, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

The Commander in Chief showed HER ability to lead America into a NEW DAY during the debate last night. Mr Obama CONTINUES to jab Sen Clinton at every crossroad because HE cannot answer the tought PERSONAL issues which DOG him.
Commentators asked Sen Obama about AYERS; the Anti-American terrorist living amongst us. Obama states “well..I was 8 when he bombed New York”. YET, Obama , as an adult, is a neighbor of his WHO indeed has spent time with AYERS. Then Obama states that his pastor is “angry!” I think we can see that from the videos on YOU TUBE. During 20 years of being mentored and working alongside this man, Mr Obama NEVER heard Rev’s racist reamrks. RIGHT?
I guess all of this REALITY is Sen Clinton’s fault?? Obama demeans her by calling her ANNIE OAKLEY..how sexist!And she BAKED COOKIES as First Lady. Mr. Obama is a disgrace.

Posted by: DaneNM | April 17, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

THE ONLY REASON SO MANY OF YOU ARE CALLING THE DEBATE UNFAIR IS BECAUSE YOU ARE SUPPORTERS OF BARACK OBAMA. THE SAME MEDIA HAS TREATED HILLARY UNFAIR FOR MONTHS WHILE YOU ALL GLOATED. NOW SINCE OBAMA IS BEING TREATED LIKE A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE SHOULD BE YOU CALL THE DEBATE AND MODERATORS UNFAIR. SOUNDS LIKE OBAMAS FOLLOWERS ARE NOW CRYING! WHAAAA! WHAAAA!

Posted by: Justin | April 17, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Alex – Blame ABC for Obama’s poor debate preparation? If you honestly want someone to blame then place the blame where it correctly belongs, with Obama’s campaign managers who did not prepared him for questions that have been floating around for months now on all news organizations and internet blogs in one form or another.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

ABC and Hillary supporters should be ashame of themselves!! I will NEVER watch them again. I WAS a Hillary supporter until this ridiculous debate last night. What a waste of my time. Shame ON YOU Gibson and Stephanopolous!!

Posted by: Karen | April 17, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

After Peter Jennings died and Ted Koppel retired,
ABC News has become more and more indistinguishabe from
the output of its parent company. I think if George and Charlie had their mouse ears on, last night’s lynch party would have far less offensive. If I see either of these hacks do a smarmy “Race in America” special, I’ll either die laughing or have a stroke .So no more ABC news for me .Doctor’s orders.

Posted by: ashton | April 17, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Crystal, you’re right, the CNN/MSNBC zombie’s can’t handle hard hitting stories about starlets caught without their panties, Britney Spears’ day to day schedule, and Celebrity tatoos. ABC is just too highbrow and substantive I guess.

Posted by: Byron | April 17, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Thank you ABC
Thank you ABC
Thank you ABC
Thank you ABC
Thank you ABC

Posted by: Rick from Pa | April 17, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Awesome job ABC. Was Obama sweating a little? Better than CNN with that feamale moderator who has a crush on Obama and NBC with Tim Russel who was litteraly drooling.
Got another lifer here ABC!

Posted by: Samson | April 17, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

As I read over the many reviews of last night’s “debate,” I see an almost unanimous conclusion by intelligent writers that ABC soiled its pants. Then I see the following headline:
Obama Attempts to Brush Off Tough Debate
If that headline isn’t proof of slanted and superficial journalism, then I am an alien (I’m not). It was not a tough debate. It was a childish display by the moderators that they don’t have a clue what concerns voters.
Obama summed it up correctly that the two men with the honor to be the moderators were as trivial as the trivia they focused on, and that is true regardless of whom you support. We deserve better.

Posted by: BenHurt | April 17, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I was very saddened by Charlie and George’s performance last night. Was this an ABC News event, or was it an episode of “A Current Affair”?!? Holy tabloid journalism, Batman!!! 45 minutes worth of B.S. until we got an actual policy question? What is that all about?!?

Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Hilton supporters should thank Obama instead of saying he is weak. He chose that route in politics. Questions he could have asked to give back in same coin as Clinton (or the moderators could have):
(1) Can one accurately say you are implicitly spending Columbia’s money while you claim to be against their trade deal since you fie a joint tax with Bill and he took 800K from them?
(2) If you are very serious about this opposition to the deal, why would you not fire your top staff member that collects money for promoting the deal you oppose?
(3) As a follow up to the Bosnia story (the way they kept hounding Barack): Can you call it a mispeak if you repeated the same falsehood three times?
Is Bill’s explanation accurate that this happens when one 60 and getting a little forgetful?
(4) Do you believe that Barack is indeed elitist compared to you considering that you also went to Yale and made 110 million last year?
(5) Peter vs. Paul: Does this suit claiming payments in exchange for potential favors not keep dogging you folks not present a problem against the GOP – if not at worst another impeachment or white house trial?
The only counter Obama lobbed regarding pardon of the same underground members Clinton raised and she was asked if she wished to respond or wait till after the break, she quickly recoiled, chose the latter, and never brought it up again. Hill really is a bully!
A lot of restraint and discipline it must have taken to stick to his principles. As for ABC I am boycotting the political coverage here for the rest of the election.

Posted by: J. Richter | April 17, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

It’s quite apparent that ABC is trying to brush off it’s performance from last night by not addressing the horrible performance by it’s two “newsmen.”
What is ABC, Gibson, and Georgie behaving like cowards. Address the criticism that 90% of posters and quite of few of their colleagues have raised against them. Somewhere in that response should be an apology.

Posted by: Ann C | April 17, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

I expect more from a major news organization like ABC, but found the questions to be uninformative and trivial, focusing on the least common denominator mentality that gets us nowhere in this country.
Shame on ABC. Remind me not to watch political coverage from them again…

Posted by: Brian | April 17, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

sounds like a few obama lemmings would make good politicians…..typing out a lot, but really saying nothing at all….

Posted by: chris | April 17, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

The way Obama acts, and far more telling… the way his fanatical supporters act, reminds me far too much of the brow beating pontificating of Bush and his supporters 4 years ago. Blind devotion to an empty campaign slogan. I was actually called a communist for not supporting Bush…Doesn’t that tone sound a little familiar?!?!
Thanks Obama supporters, you have finally convinced me that despite having voted Democrat for the last 24 years, I will give my vote to McCain if Obama wins the nomination. I will never be just another sheep in a cult of personality.

Posted by: VoteAnyway | April 17, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

FINALLY a debate that was so fair that Saturday Night Live won’t have to lampoon it.
Oh how cruel the media is when it’s objective.
Lol.

Posted by: Jo | April 17, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Karen – You were never a Hillary supporter. I’ve read too many of your post to swallow that lie.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Obama was horrible last night. He shrugs it off as politics as usual. If he can’t handle the heat he should get out of the kitchen. Politics is as politics does. Sorry you really can’t get around it. The GE will be worse. He can’t hang. Plain and simple. He sound way off his game. If Hillary answered a policy question first, he repeated her answer. I am tired of his round about way of answering. He should learn to be concise. But if he did, he would make a lot more gafes. If he is our nominee John McCain will be the next President. Sad to say, but that is the reality.

Posted by: bambi | April 17, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

The smearing of ABC News by the Obama campaign and supporters is the only proof we need that he lost the debate and did real damage to his career by being unable to formulate concise answers to direct questions.
Drip. Drip. Drip.

Posted by: len | April 17, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

I think the polls are way off. We really aren’t going to know just what is what until voting is done. Obama is a stage show. That became real clear last night. If you can’t admit your wrong about anything it’s only because you are out of touch. People like a rock star, they don’t have to think just enjoy the show. Hard choices now have to be made. I hope people start thinking and make the correct ones. Obama is an empty suit.

Posted by: James France | April 17, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

I think the polls are way off. We really aren’t going to know just what is what until voting is done. Obama is a stage show. That became real clear last night. If you can’t admit your wrong about anything it’s only because you are out of touch. People like a rock star, they don’t have to think just enjoy the show. Hard choices now have to be made. I hope people start thinking and make the correct ones. Obama is an empty suit.

Posted by: James France | April 17, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

you obama lemmings are in for emotional trauma when his campaign inevitably fails against the much more harsh and unrelenting attack machines of the neo-conservative movement, a la swift boat vets…..

Posted by: chris | April 17, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

If Obama feels bruised today it’s because he is unused to a fair examination of his past. If Hillary is too tough how would he fair against Dmitry Medvedev and Vladimir Putin. We cannot afford this media creation to run the country.

Posted by: AZOLDTIMER | April 17, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Go Obama like Jay-Z said,”brush that dirt off your shoulder”!

Posted by: Emilianna | April 17, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Are you guys aware these comments are not from real people. They are mostly Obama’s staffers. What I saw on tv last night is the truth. If you want ABC to treat Obama fairly, please could someone cover the Renzo Trial? Put Larry Sinclair info out there so it could be put to rest. There are people trying to figure out the real Obama. You people are just like the woman from Polygamist cult, D E N I A L, D E N I A L, denial.
Open your eyes

Posted by: simcreator | April 17, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Yeah, Obama had a bad night allright… According to a poll on this site 40k think he won the debate to Hillary’s 15k. The media coverage of this debate is surreal. The media are out of touch. How can people still say the media is in the tank for Obama?? Get real journalists. It’s about ISSUES not flag pins! And read your own polls!

Posted by: mike | April 17, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

POOR PERFORMANCE. Congratulations to Charlie and George. Finally, the media is subjecting this guy to scrutiny. After all, he is running for leader of the U.S. of America. It disturbs me greatly that this guy’s name turns up at the Rezko trial and he and wife attend an affair at which a MidEast person is present who is no longer welcome in America but has major problems with France. This comes after he disses Small-Town America and after his reverend friend spews his venom at America. Keep up the good work Charlie. We also need to more of his association with the Weather Underground connection. Thanks.

Posted by: benvictor | April 17, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Stephanopoulos stated that they only asked tough questions. But they were stupid tough questions. We knew what the answers would be. Over 4000 dead US soldiers. $4.00 gas prices. Torture. There were no tough questions with those topics. ABC droped the ball on this one. What a let down and waste of my time. I won’t watch another debate hosted by ABC. Where is the league of Women…Did they not host the debates before?

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

THE COUNTRY IS IN TERRIBLE WAR 4,034 LIVE LOST AND OVER 320,000 TERRIBLE INJURY, WHEN OUR COUNTRY IS IN RECSSION TWO ABC JOURNALISTS ASKED THE CANDIDATE WHY HE DID NOT EWEAR A FLAG PIN? I CAN NOT CALL GEORGE S. AND CHARLIE G. A JOURNALISTS.

Posted by: selam musgun | April 17, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

This was the most even-handed debate. It is interesting that only Obama’s followers believe it wasn’t. It seems he can’t even be questioned without their believing it is heretical.

Posted by: yael | April 17, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

I guess the difference between Clinton and Obama supporters is that Clinton supporters cry victimhood and disgrace when Clinton’s voting record or political record is questioned. Now, if Obama had been hammered on POLICY last night, then I wouldn’t be here. Just like when Kerry got beat in the 2nd debate in 2004, if you lose, you lose and you move on. Calling out Obama in a debate setting on tabloid issues for 45 minutes is not the same as calling out Clinton on a vote in the senate or a position she took on an issue. If you honestly think it is, then you’re just as brainwashed as the Obama supporters you revile.

Posted by: Byron | April 17, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Everyone is making excuses for the paper tiger. Barrack Hussein Obama has no teeth, he’s all bark and no bite.
Did you see that filthy look he had on his face? When he doesn’t smile he looks like a serial killer. Menacing, trying to stare down the panel, daring them with sneers to ask him the quesitons that he didn’t think they would ask.
They asked, he crumpled like the paper tiger he is.
Bye Obama, you’re done

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Obama sucks and will never be President of anything but the Arrogant Club!

Posted by: Justin | April 17, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Sound like he asked for a pity from the people in Raleigh as always .
I’m sure he would take another debate if his darling media CNN or MSNBC hold the debate.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Peter Jennings’s network should be ashamed of itself. George and Charlie, gossip is not journalism. You displayed the very elitism that you accuse others of because you assumed the American public is unworthy of a substantive discussion of what matters: Americans and Iraqis are dying everyday, the economy is veering into the second Great Depression, our highest government officials specifically sanctioned acts of torture, our civil liberties and constitution are being trampled upon, and our media, whose obligation is to inform us so that WE THE PEOPLE can competently govern ourselves, has abandoned all responsibility to do so in order to titilate us and bring us down into the mud with them. Shameful, shameful, shameful. But I should have expected nothing more–as I recall, George had the gall and crassness to once ask Senator Obama if his “cool style” had anything to do with his race!! That is what you consider to be journalism, George. Very uncool!!

Posted by: Nancy | April 17, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

This debate was a hit job I was on the fence as far as who would be the better candidate and looking forward to watching this debate because I expected substantive, relevant questions to be asked to more distinguish the candidates. What I saw was more like a National Enquirer special. It was nothing more than tabloid journalism. I actually felt embarrassed for the commentators, because it seemed like with each lame questioned they asked, they lost a little more credibility. I thought that Obama held up very well in light of the cheap supermarket newsstand subject matter. ABC news it was clear on what your intent was, but because you didn’t ask the questions that matter I have to go with who I think has more credibility and that sir is Mr. Barrack Obama.
…oh by the way I don’t think I will watch any of your news shows ever again.

Posted by: Cdr Scott | April 17, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

jrichter Obama was telling you he just got off food stamps while filing o 4,238,000 .what a joke. Was bill supposted to quit working years before Hill ran for Pres.Keep in mind Hillary is running for Pres. not Bill.Tell who exactly did Hillary pardon .Please facts not the B.S. of hope

Posted by: roncraw | April 17, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Reading about the debate confirms my decision not to have watched it. Why waste my time watching self-important blowhards on silliness like flag pins and what someone’s associate might have done 40 years ago?
Who is going to do better dealing with the catastrophe in Iraq? Who has plans to deal with the credit meltdown? Who is going to figure out how to raise the value of the dollar? Who can better handle the healthcare crisis? Who reveres the U.S. Constitution, and plans to make sure it’s followed and those who abuse it are punished? Um, these are the things that are important to me.
Thanks for validating my decision not to watch network news anymore.

Posted by: Sharon | April 17, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

ABC News should be ashamed for the pathetic and lightweight performance of Messrs. Gibson and Stephanopoulos during last night’s debate. While Charlie was busy lobbing ill-conceived trivial questions about lapel pins and ancient history, George was rattling off a hit list of questions given to him by Sean Hannity the night before. I used to respect Charles Gibson. No longer. In the first portion of the debate, he adamantly avoided a single question of substance, and proceeded in the second half to ARGUE with Senator Obama, overstepping any role a “moderator” ought to have. I have to agree with everyone else who’s noticed that your team of soi-disant “journalists” couldn’t manage to find a relevant issue with both hands and a road map. I would have paid real money to see a debate on issues as opposed to the tripe you served up.

Posted by: James A. Davis | April 17, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Shame on Charlie Gibson and ABC for wasting the first hour on nonsense. I want to hear about the real issues that America is facing right now and that I think a lot of people care about.

Posted by: Fran | April 17, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

I watched the debate yesterday, and I was shocked to see ABC selected George Stephanopolos as a moderator for a debate involving Senator Clinton. A debate moderator needs to be neutral in order to maintain the integrity of the debate. The fact that he worked not only as one of Bill Clinton’s top campaign aides, but served on former President Clinton’s Cabinet should have immediately disqualified him. He has long ties to the Clintons, and clearly cannot meet the appearance of neutrality. The Debate was a sham. Shame on you ABC!

Posted by: Christian1st | April 17, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

I thought the debate was bias towards Obama. The debate was an insult to Obama, me and Americans. Charlie and George has lost my respect to be involved in assine debate that reflected your bias attitude toward Obama. I will not be watching anything that they are involved in.You need to apoligize to Obama and us viewers for put us through that talk show you called a debate. It is quite apparent that they do not like Obama and they should have not let their good old boys attitude show. Yes Obama might not have answered question the way people wanted him to but why should he, he’s damn if he does and damn if he doesn’t.Obama should not do another debate with ABC stooges.Bush was one of the worst debater I ever heard and no one said anything much about him.

Posted by: BRENDA B | April 17, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Did I not hear negative from Obama last night? Something about making cookies. Did he need to mention that. Who called who Annie Oakley? He acts like he isn’t negative….

Posted by: lois | April 17, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Irritated – Well, its back to MSNBC huh? See ya.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Bugs Bunny and George Traitor gleefully sailed into Obama with those questions for forty-five minutes, salivating with every word, inducing Hillary to act like the b. that she is.
Disgusting! ABC and those two idiots ought to fold up your tent and slink quitely into the night where you can all sleep with your miserable heads buried up the a. of the carcass of the dead horse you beat up on.
Disgusting!

Posted by: disgusted | April 17, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

comment to Mechan8
That is so funny because I was myself researching that same thing yesterday
and came to the same conclusions. That is great!

Posted by: Linda Taylor | April 17, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

BRAVO ABC, AT LAST A NETWORK WHO DARES TO ASK TOUGH QUESTIONS TO OBAMA. COMING BACK TO WATCH ABC EVENING NEWS, I THINK THAT IS WHY CBS AND NBC NEWS IS LAME.

Posted by: gwat | April 17, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

“THE COUNTRY IS IN TERRIBLE WAR 4,034 LIVE LOST AND OVER 320,000 TERRIBLE INJURY, WHEN OUR COUNTRY IS IN RECSSION TWO ABC JOURNALISTS ASKED THE CANDIDATE WHY HE DID NOT EWEAR A FLAG PIN?”
_______________
First of all, war is terrible. But this war stopped hundreds of thousands of lives in the process and disposed an Arabic Hitler regime. The lives lost mirror what we lost in 911. At least our soldiers have guns..
Second…WE ARE NOT IN A RECESSION! IT TAKES 2 QUARTERS OF ECONOMIC DOWNTURN TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A MILD RECESSION.
Knock off the war and recession crap, let’s talk about character, which Obama is sorely lacking.
A man is judged by the company he keeps,
Wright, Farrakhan, Rezko,Ayers,Sinclair, Black Panthers, Nation of Islam, etc.
He is not fit to lead this country.

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

I am a life long democrat and was going to vote for the democrat nominee. Obama’s perfomance and the pro-Obama crowd here convinced me to vote McCain if there is no Hillary. Now I see why more Hillary voters say that they will vote for McCain if she is not the nominee.
Thanks ABC!!

Posted by: Sally | April 17, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Isn’t it odd that Obama is a color of yellow and nerves, followed by stutters when answering direct questions in front of the world but when able to read off his prepared speeches like today in front of people who are obviously all there to support him, he is just like slick Jay-Jay! This man has no sulutions for this country! What a waste of a man and you see him brushing off his shoulder in the arrogant way with comments about Hillary, this is the same way he will be brushing YOU OFF, when you complain to him if elected. How arrogant and similar to Bush!

Posted by: Rosa | April 17, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

abc (small cap intended) shamefully wasted the 1st 45 minutes of the debate on tabloid journalism issues. i’ll get my news from the other networks in the future and find abc’s style of journalism at tmz.
hopefully any future debates will address the issues important to the country. imagine any president who used his bully pulpit to speak about bosnia snipers and flag pins instead of substantive issues like our faltering economy and our moral standing in the world and i’ll show you a democracy in trouble.

Posted by: bye abc | April 17, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Obama doesn’t want to debate again? I wonder why? Could it be that the blinders are off on him now? Could it be he can’t control what comes out of the mouths of the moderators? He has to rely on more thn the words of a prepared speech. Now if only he can get out of debating McCain in the fall.If you want to be President, people are going to ask a few questions about who you are and what makes you tick.He better toughen up if he wants to survive the fall.

Posted by: Kathleen | April 17, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

The moderation of this debate was a complete joke. It takes 45 minutes to get to real issues when gas prices, food prices, and inflation are at record highs. 45 minutes of non-issues before substance when we are at war? Stephanopoulos taking cue questions from Sean Hannity? Give me a stinkin break! Complete and utter non-sense. I’ll be looking elsewhere for news. Bye-bye to this nightly Nightline watcher!

Posted by: Sean | April 17, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

I don’t understand why they keep bringing up the Bosnia thing. I have watched that news clip several times and it was always my impression that Hillary was making a light hearted joke. Go back and look at it again, she was laughing when she said it and in no way did that appear to be her trying to state a historical fact. The media beats up on her because she is to business like and not personable enough. So when she makes a light hearted joke they want to persecute her because it wasn’t factual. The media has made much more out of it than either of her two apponents.

Posted by: greenthumbx | April 17, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Roger Simon – Politico 4/17/08
There is an old saying: “The person who can’t dance says the band can’t play.” And Obama does not like the way the band has been playing lately.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 17, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I applaud ABC for finally nailing down Obama and making him answer the tough questions. He has been the “golden” boy of this election way to long. I see him finally getting vetted, and as America can see, when he is on the “stump” and under pressure, he loses it and can’t handle it…..therefore, he will never be President. Good job, Hillary! You’ve proven that you are the Democratic candidate and will go on to win the election! Hillary 08 !

Posted by: david from texas | April 17, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

The poll said he won.
Which one?
On internet?
Of cource, how many Hillary supporters access to internet including elderly people, working class people, mothers with young children etc. Some people don’t even have time to surf on internet.
I believe most of college students have more than enough time to surf on the internet.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Pope: America needs to be a land of hope for all!
It should be a sad day in ABC Land.
I was always taught, that when someone shows you who they are, YOU better believe them. Thanks Hillary, now I am sure to vote for Obama!!!!!!!

Posted by: Kokosnapper | April 17, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

As a resident of Philadelphia, I am outraged by the gang banging of Barack Obama last night during the presidential “debate”. Could these two smarmy media hit men do a bit more research before their next tag team performance? Do they know how many GI’s died in Iraq last week? Do they know how much the national debt went up yesterday, or how many people came into emergency rooms in critical condition because they had no insurance and no primary care physician? Aren’t discussing these issues a bit more of our democratic duty as voters than eliciting a brawl over who wears lapel pins, who has had a friend or associate say something controversial. It is like being pecked to death by parokeets. Democracy depends upon an educated populace. That is the whole reason public airwaves are licensed. I am absolute disgusted with ABC and their self important “commentators.” My friends and I are discussing how to challenge ABC’s public broadcasting license, boycotting their news coverage, boycotting Disney. Here in the shadow of Independence Hall, where the constitution was written, one would expect a modicum of seriousness and sobriety as we face the next four years of digging our country out of the abyss we have fallen into. Christine Bork

Posted by: Christine Bork | April 17, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

How can anyone say that last night’s “debate” was good? I heard nothing that satisfied me about border control, terrorism, taxes, education, health care, etc, etc.
I’m neutral but I sure didn’t think Hilary came off in the best light.

Posted by: touchetgal | April 17, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Did anybody review the questions those 2 bozos (Charles and Stephanopoutsos) were asking? What a disgrace to the Network. ABCinquirer debate. 2 thumbs down on Gibson. Acording to the polls, Obama WON! so why do Ignorant people at ABC keep trying to spin this their way? Hillary has stooped to an all time low, acting like a Repulsivecan.

Posted by: sam | April 17, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Is there any doubt that Obama supporters have the thinnest skins? Who are they taking their lead from?
I am so tired of people saying there are some subjects that are below the debate format.
My thinking is that the questions that continually and repeatedly come up for Obama to answer, come up because people are NOT satisfied with his previsous attempts at an answer.
Get a clue Obama campaign!

Posted by: sherr | April 17, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Hillary definately won the debat last night. The truth about Obama is coming out now and the Obamabots can’t stand it. He finally got a taste of what Hillary has been going thru the last 15 mos. I’m glad the moderators opened up on him and now America and the world sees him for the liar and bigot he is. And, once again, he still supported Uncle Wright and Ayers. What a joke Obama is!

Posted by: Jack | April 17, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Neither ABC. Charlie nor Georgie anything to ‘inform the public’ about issues of true national interest. Instead,the ‘so called debate’ turned out to be a complete
sham. Shame on ABC and the lowball and shallow ‘debate questions’ posed by two
‘questioners’. (The term, ‘moderator’ assumes a person with respect for the integrity of their efforts. ) I/ we agree with SergioS and SHAN of approx 4:52PM entry
Ask yourselves, dear reader: Doesn’t it make sense that a persons’ style of leading/ managing a campaign for U.S. Preident be be indicative of ‘style and skills that person would bring to the job of U.S. President ? If you want a cadidate who would bring experience of putting forth a well managed, forward looking, issues oriented campaign while avoiding throwing devisive, misrepresented and issue – distracting tactics into the mix.. then its BARACK OBAMA for U.S. President. We just can’t afford the likes of Mrs. Clinton nor of Mr. McCain.

Posted by: Cindy | April 17, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

I am completely dismayed by the questioning from Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos. It was one full hour of triviality and character assassination before the first substantive question was asked. Rev. Wright, flag pins, an aging 60′s agitator, and Sen. Clinton’s fantasies about her trip to Bosnia almost 10 years ago are NOT the issues in this campaign. Not a single question was asked about things that directly affect the American people — energy security, climate change, the plummetting value of the dollar, or the growing inability of average Americans to make ends meet, to name a few. The ABC entertainment department must have had some influence on both the scheduling of the debate (not “live” on the West Coast in order to keep it in primetime) and the flavor of the questioning clearly aimed at provoking controversy and headlines. I thought the two moderators demeaned themselves. I will be far less inclined to watch ABC’s coverage of this election.

Posted by: Cynthia | April 17, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Obama wants to change “that kind of politics”? Old opponents from his congressional and senate races might get a big laugh from that characterization.
In the Senate race Obama used personal information that had been shared with Axelrod by his opponent when he was considering hiring Axelrod as his media consultant. Axelrod went instead with Obama and that candidates’ messy personal life – part of a sealed court record by the way – became part of Obama’s strategy to eliminate this guy.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 17, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Wow the Obama followers are going to boycott ABC for being biased?
Suddenly, the Obama followers have included the words “media bias” in their vocabulary. Guys, this has been going on since the campaign started with MSNBC and CNN moderators and their contributors blasting Sen Clinton. Please get real.
May “karma” befall those who promote injustice.

Posted by: politicsIsdirty | April 17, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

These Obama fanatics need serious psycho therapy. These postings are ridiculous!

Posted by: mark | April 17, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

You, at ABC showed the world that you are a complete hackneed outfit with little or no integrity.
That debate was an absolute fiasco. No substainative questions but tabloid stuff only.
You should be ashamed. You have shamed yourself for certain.

Posted by: John Wilsonh | April 17, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

So Obama got Tax done yesterday? Paying student loan to a surplus of $4 million even before he is president? With this pace he is going to out do Clinton’s in no time. BTW ABC rocks!!

Posted by: Mohammad | April 17, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

To PamsDisgustedbyABC who asked me to get back to you ….
During the entire debate, did you notice that Senator Obama’s explanation on whether he would raise or not raise capital gain taxes was vague? This particular policy would affect those who make between $97,000 and $250,000. But I did not get an answer.
Did you also notice that Senator Obama did not answer whether he opposes or supports licensing of hand guns with a clear yes or no?
You can choose to beat George and Charlie for daring to ask your candidate questions that you perceive are silly and irrelevant. You should also judge your candidate based on his response and performance to these questions.
If you’re happy and content with your candidate’s response, why are you getting so upset with the network and the moderators? Go out and promote your candidate’s strengths if you believe your candidate is a strong candidate who can shine beautifully regardless of the situation or circumstance around him.
If you believe in your candidate’s message of “Change from Bottom to Top,”
“Change Washington,” “Hope”, “Unite America,” you should not be getting so upset with me, or challenging me.
You are supposed to get ready to unite …. even with me … someone who has very different priorities and judgements than yours. If you cannot do that yet, listen to your candidate’s preaching more ….. until you get a bit more stable. You sound pretty emotional at the moment. And I understand your pain.

Posted by: Crystal Coy | April 17, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

ABC made what I used to think were respectable anchors into tabloid journalists for Extra or TMZ. Can the American people get some issues here please? Obama was right in his remarks about it taking 45 min to hear the issues. ABC has lost much of my respect.

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

I don’t believe in polls. Everything, including the MSM media can be fixed to support one candidate over the other. I believe in my God given tools. I saw Obama struggle desperately with his evasive answers. I heard pointing of fingers directed towards Hillary. I only wish I could reach out and wipe that smug look of his face.

Posted by: simcreator | April 17, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

DISGUSTING. Is this is what our democracy has de-evolved into?
Regardless of what side of the fence you reside, that debate was a sham and an insult. ABC needs to fire the Clinton whipping boy. I’m done with ABC.

Posted by: markw | April 17, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Obama was clueless last night and all those blaming the media did not blame the media when Hillary was bashed and relentlessly grilled. Welcome to the club!

Posted by: tiffany | April 17, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Anti gutter press guy- CONGRATULATIONS on a GREAT POST. You said it all. Let me just add that as a retired teacher, I have heard more intelligent questioning from a first grader than those that were posed by ABC. I also APPLAUD Obama for his restraint. NEVER confuse wisdom for weakness. This is NOT a weak man or a weak candidate. He is strong, with GREAT character. What a gentleman. I believe him that when the Republicans start to attack, that’s when his comebacks will be vicious.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | April 17, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

I watched the FOX wannabees last night show their true colors. How embarrassing it must be for any real journalists you may have! My TV preference from now on will certainly go to stations which are not so unfair and unbalanced.

Posted by: steve taylor | April 17, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

I was not happy with ABC. It was clear that ABC’s intentions was to attack Obama along with Hillary. What a shame, I am so done with the media. One day all of this will come back and bite you in the you know what.
ABC off my list.

Posted by: Cassie | April 17, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

ABC should be ashamed of themselves. They have just joined FOX as being the smut of the industry. If Obama becomes President I sincerely hope that he will boycott ABC News from the White House. Do you know the meaning of the word debate? That is not what happened last night. You owe both candidates, but especially Obama an apology. Why do you keep asking him the same questions? Answers don’t change unless you are lying. Ask Hillary. Why didn’t you press Hillary about the Weatherman pardoned during his first administration, as she claims? And George I will never watch your Sunday show again. You should be fired for the favoritism you showed toward Hillary. This is reporting at it’s worst. Your ratings will definitely drop. However, through it all Obama is still leading and will gain more when PA, NC and Indiana votes.

Posted by: Juanita Blassingame | April 17, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Wow! The Hypocrisy is BREATHTAKING!!! Where were Hillary, George and Charlie’s flag pins??!!!!!
ABC/FOX MERGER

Posted by: Coreen` | April 17, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

As to whether or not I will watch another debate with Hillary? NO. What would be new? Same old, same old. Nonsense.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | April 17, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

I have no bias towards Obama or Clinton, so I think I can be objective when I say that Charles Gibson’s question to Obama about flag lapel pins marked a new low in American political discourse and for American journalism. Mr. Gibson should apologize to the American people for wasting our time and insulting our intelligence.

Posted by: David | April 17, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

this was the most disgraceful debate ever! How are all these questions going to put food on the table, cut gasoline prices, bring our soldiers home??? They don’t! Shame on ABC!

Posted by: martuco | April 17, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

You people are just as bad a d the commantors last night. I was set to hear how the canindates were going to change this country. I am disguised with us as a nation. It is sad that we have come to this, I always knew that it was not going to be easy, but I never dreamed that it would be like this. The canindates are human and none of them are without sin, so for you who say you hate Obama or found it funny that predijice is okay even in the media. I have a problem with America and I am not proud of Americans.

Posted by: Emilianna | April 17, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Gibson and Little Man Tate were pathetic last night. Maybe they’re watching too much TMZ. It was so disappointing. In an ideal world, I would hope our press corp would be able, and WANT, to wade thru the B.S. They asked the most inane questions and fed right into the political machine. ABC did a disservice to our country last night, and they need to be held accountable. Compared to Murrow, Cronkite, etc…Gibson and Steph look like clowns. Seriously. Clowns.

Posted by: Ryan | April 17, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

When did Obama live with his grandparents? When did he live in Kansas? From everything I’ve read he was born in Hawaii, lived in Indonesia and came back to the U.S. to go to Occidental College which is in LA. Does he think visiting his grandma in the summer is living with her or just when did he live with her?

Posted by: sarnorton | April 17, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

After watching the ‘debate’ last night, it is now confirmed – ABC News ‘journalists’ are a bunch of morons.

Posted by: Dave | April 17, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

What the heck kind of LOADED TITLE is this?:
“Obama Attempts to Brush Off Tough Debate”
It was NOT a tough debate, and Obama didn’t need to ‘attempt’ to brush off anything, because nearly nothing was actually said but answers to meaningless questions and drivel.
It should actually read:
“ABC Attempts to Brush Off Tough Debate”

Posted by: Tristan | April 17, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

SickOfIt: Apparently you can’t read. Obama lost the debate and it is well known on the internet. First of all Obama cannot answer the question without thinking what to say. Hillary can answr immediately. Obama being a college graduate he must have been passed thru to get rid of him. I can see why. Drugs and booze.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 17, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

I LIKE CHARLIE AND GEORGE!But they are the ones that sucked last night, not the candidates! The phrasing of the questions were moronic at best. It’s as if they wanted a “gotcha!!” moment and and somehow box them in on issues. It was rather seedy. I felt like taking a shower afterwards. What about medicare, gas prices, social security, mortgage foreclosures? Does talking about the american flag lapel pin (probably made in China) put food on the table of struggling blue workers about to loose their homes? This is why the media gets lambasted. It’s a race to the bottom. We expected more from you “experienced” journalists.

Posted by: Mariano | April 17, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Obama said last night that he didn’t get advice from Ayers “on a regular basis”. Exactly what does that mean? I wish the two moderators had questioned him more on that statement.

Posted by: sarnorton | April 17, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

ABC blew the chance to ask solid questions. Questions people in America are asking about 320,000 shell shocked troops, America’s food chain, disappearing student loans, outsourced jobs, rebuilding infrastructure and developing alternative energy. Instead, we got questions about American flag pins. ABC treated this debate like it was American Idol. Weak journalism – America deserves better.

Posted by: idahogirl | April 17, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Horrible terrible unpatriotic moderators.
Fascist show trial had more integrity.
No more ABC for our family and friends.

Posted by: elfadam | April 17, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Why this people here ask ABC to fire Gibson and George?
They don’t do anything wrong. All those questions are for the candidates to answer the truth about everything. Hillary supporters never ask Chris Matthew, Cooper and the gangs to get fired.
This was only ONE TIME your idol got the heat and you guys are so angry.
Hopefully if Obama did not win the election all of you won’t do something negative.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Of course Obama wants to talk about the ‘issues’ . Obama states for the record any attack on his character is low politics. Beneath him. His character isnt ALLOWED to be critiqued.
Its the same elitist philosophy the liberals have always used. Unless you think like a liberal, you are WRONG no matter what.
Only liberals are enlightened. Nobody can think a different way. It will be inferior to the liberal way of thinking.
This is Barack Obama folks. Get used to it.

Posted by: tomdavie | April 17, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Prior to last night’s moderator performance, I had considered Charles Gibson one of the most unbiased of the news anchors. No more. His hostile, aggressive, negative questioning of Barak Obama was certainly not the performance of an unbiased observer, to say nothing of the quality of the questions. Thousands die in Iraq, and these moderators are concerned about lapel pins? Talking heads, indeed!

Posted by: Alice | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Barack we will be brushing YOU off in the voting booth!
You are not good enough to be our president, you are a hot head, arrogant and inexperienced. You have to be vetted, it may as well be the republicans as they show no mercy.

Posted by: H P Boston | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I watched the debate yesterday, and I was shocked to see ABC selected George Stephanopolos as a moderator for a debate involving Senator Clinton. A debate moderator needs to be neutral in order to maintain the integrity of the debate. The fact that he worked not only as one of Bill Clinton’s top campaign aides, but served on former President Clinton’s Cabinet should have immediately disqualified him. He has long ties to the Clintons, and clearly cannot meet the appearance of neutrality. The Debate was a sham. Shame on you ABC!

Posted by: Christian | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

There you go again – Barack – being condescending and wiping away the criticism – if you can’t stand the heat of a Democrat debate then maybe you should consider dropping out of the race now and saving yourself the embarrasment of any other debates.
Nice suit – no substance – Barack Obama!

Posted by: MP | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Best debate ever.
Hugs and Kisses to all of ABC,
Karl Rove

Posted by: Todd | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

If people really want to fight back at ABC News and the MSM then vote for Green Party candidates! This two-party system hasn’t worked for 3 hundred years, let’s mix it up!

Posted by: hashim | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Best debate ever.
Hugs and Kisses to all of ABC,
Karl Rove

Posted by: Todd | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Why haven’t anyone asked Hillary Clinton about Bill Clinton’s Illegitimate Child with another women? This would make for a great political expose’ that the Clinton’s don’t want to talk about. Obama could have gone negative there’s lot of things in Clinton’s bag of mischief. The Clinton has lots of dirty laundry in that bay no pun intended.
Obama all the way!

Posted by: Lookup | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I’m concerned about the loss of civil liberties, the costs of the war, national debt/borrowing from China, corporate greed/lobbyists, college education costs, and a healthcare system I can’t afford.
I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT FLAG PINS!!

Posted by: mich c | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

WAY TO GO SENATOR CLINTON!!! WAY TO GO ABC!! FAIR AND BALANCED COVERAGE!!!
I have enlclosed the link to the Rollingstone article discussed in last night’s debate: (He lied and Is he above the fact checking you put Senator Clinton through!)
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/sto ry/13390609/campaign_08_the_radical_root s_of_barack_obama/print
CLINTON 08 – School is in session!!!!!!

Posted by: Chas | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Last night’s “debate” was a travesty and and an insult to the American people. Charlie and George should hang thei heads in shame. I admire
Last night was a travesty. Charlie and George ought to hang their heads in shame. Obama tried to talk about issues but the moderators were more interested in dirt.
Shame on ABC. This so-called “debate” was a total waste of time.

Posted by: mickey | April 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

White America will never change – it is just as racist towards Black people as Hitler was towards the Jewish people.

Posted by: Phyllis | April 17, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Clearly last night was nothing more than a “hit job” on Obama. All the polls I’ve seen today show that people sided with him. Clinton supporters can claim a victory if they choose, everyone knows they have very little to brag about.

Posted by: ex-GOP voter | April 17, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

It’s really sad that the kinds of issues brought up in the first part of the debate could even potentially lead to a Republican win, could sway voters that much. It says a lot about the intelligence (or lack thereof) of our country.

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

“ABC SHAME ON YOU FOR ATTACKING OBAMA JUST LIKE FOX NEWS. DID THE CLINTONS PAY YOU FOR THIS SHAMEFUL DEBATE.”
Posted by: Amira Hussein
———————–
Are you related to B. Hussein Obama?
LOL!

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

The only joke is that Obama was totally unprepared to answer any questions knowledgeably or honestly. ABC finally pressed him on real questions, and he couldn’t handle it. He had that deer in the headlights look a lot of the time, and you could tell by his face he was thinking, this can’t be happening! Obama supporters cry fowl at ABC and their moderators because this debate wasn’t a cake walk for him like all of the previous ones. Hillary has been treated like a rabid dog ever since the annointed one came on the scene, and it’s about time Obama and his followers got a little taste of their own medicine. Maybe if he would grow up, quit whining, and actually study the issues instead of practicing lofty, though empty, speeches he might look a little more prepared next time.

Posted by: dwc | April 17, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

The world is ending before our eyes,the last days are truly here ! Take a look at events all around the world . starvation ,flooding , riots , murder, bombs going off everywhere ,record tornados , record temps , all nations are at , or near war , food shortage , gas shortage , energy shortage , job shortage ,money shortage . And look at our children , school shootings , school killings , school beatings , on video tape . People here in America of all races are killing eachother , and even their children . people are getting really bold , stabbing people in broad public view . America is changing . The love for our fellow man is beginning not to exist . When , not if , Theese problems get to the point of destroying America ,then will we start trying to fix the country ! We have a chance to start today, by watching the debate last night we can see what our country is changiong into.

Posted by: lonellsheron | April 17, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

The moderators were clowns, Obama answered well, and while Clinton was as usual brilliant on policy issues, her ability to do slime politics, when she knows better, is the ultimate in cynical, gratuitous, nasty mudslinging. This is not whining. ABC gave us garbage and an insult to our intelligence. Please. Questions on the lapel pin? Does the candidate love the American flag? Is he maybe a closet terrorist? You don’t have to want Obama for President, but at least let it be because you don’t agree with him on the ISSUES.

Posted by: timber | April 17, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

I’m so GLAD that Obama is able to have talks with very scary people and still come out with his head screwed on straight. Obviously, NONE of those “associations” have bent him over to the dark side. LOL. I’m PROUD of him for being able to talk. It proves he’s a good negotiator. It proves he is not AFRAID of getting in the lion’s den with lions. That is AWESOME. I REALLY HOPE he wins, for the sake of a strong America and a strong Israel, and friendships with the middle east that will transcend their usual bickerings together, and perhaps bring about REAL peace!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: ChayaFradle | April 17, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

That was not a “tough debate.” It was Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos — whom I usually respect, and whose colleagues I have worked with — derelict in their duty to raise real issues and relying on GOP talking-points and hype to do their jobs for them. It was a shameful day for American journalism, and ABC running headlines today about the “tough debate” only increases the shame. Wake up out of your comas, guys — the last time the press went to sleep, this country went to war.

Posted by: Steve Silberman | April 17, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Senator Clinton was totally in her element. She knows where to take this country. That other guy, he was out there last night. Expressing views of Republicans..trying to steal votes off of McCain aye? It was defintiely not a debate, it was more of a talk show. ABC, why did you allow this to happen? You were on top of your game until this stunt.

Posted by: Edward | April 17, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Obama says debate focused on ‘gotcha’ not policy issues
I feel that Obama held his own considering the fact that Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos appeared to have it in for him. Regardless of all the questions they asked trying to catch him off guard he stayed focused. Instead of trying to steer Hillary Clinton into a subject that people wanted to hear about, it seems as though they were trying to help her to make Obama appear incompetent., fortunately it didn’t work. (smart man) Hillary took a long time answering questions feeding off Obama’s answers, most of the time she danced around noncommittally. Hillary made excuses as usual saying she, “didn’t remember” the lie she told about Bosnia . (does she have Alzheimer?) I am happy that Obama was more of a man than she is a”woman” by saying that she was intitled to make an error in a statement. Another question regarding whether she throught Obama could win or not she lied and said, “yes” knowing full well that the public heard her say that he could not beat her. ABC made a point to scan the audience to find Chelsea Clinton, why I don’t understand….I didn’t notice them looking for anyone for Obama. Hillary did not want to address the issues that the public is concerned about. Like the war, economy , jobs and gas prices to name a few. All Hillary wanted to do was bring up the past. Its been enough said about about Rev Wright etc. She claims she has 40 years of experience, that’s not true….she was an attorney…her claim to fame in the White House is that she was married to Bill Clinton. I certainly hope she learns to stick to the facts and stop stretching the truth. Obama is unflappable and I like that, he will make a great president.

Posted by: Minerva63 | April 17, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Hillary’s digs into Obama is nothing more than an attempt to prevent an honest debate on honest issues because she is not qualified.
I ‘m totally disappointed with ABC. George and Charlie should be ashamed at the way they handled this debate. They fall in step with most of the other media out there helping in the persecution of yet another black man.

Posted by: Quanyin | April 17, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Obama is toast, he’s done. Get over it kiddies, see you in 4 years.

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

If ABC thinks these are tough questions, they need to just admit they are the cartoon network.

Posted by: timber | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

This was a poor excuse for a debate format about the most important issues of the day – ABC was more interested in a Jerry Springer format, and flag-waving United We Stand Flag Trash.
Shame on you ABC – corporate pig cancer in the land.

Posted by: benny_franklin | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Hillary has not even started to be hammered – all that baggage she says has been aired is going to be all aired again – and likely by the same pair of moderaters from a network endorsing John McCain.
At least last night’s debate has shown the American people one thing that has become increasingly obvious throughout the primary season for BOTH parties – we cannot allow the media to run these debates. They don’t represent the American people, are too professionally elitist to understand the issues facing the country, and have their own corporate agenda which conflicts with the public interest. There can no longer be debates sponsored by national media companies that are so out-of-touch that they are dependent upon manufactured “controversies” – often created by themselves, as the guideposts for providing the American people information to safeguard our freedom and system of government.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Also, I am proud of all of YOU who can see beyond the superficial and silly questions and realize the debate was purely for shock sake and entertainment on the part of the media. Go, Jerry Springer!!!!!

Posted by: ChayaFradle | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Mariann Pepitone – It is easy for Hillary to not pause and think about a question – she just lies.

Posted by: Todd | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

ABC did a great job, people need to stop complaining because their guy lost.
John McCain is the winner. He can stop campaigning because Obama can never win the general. He has enough far left kooks to get him the nomination but normal people will never vote for this left winger.

Posted by: IMUSLOVER | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

I can’t believe ABC hosted such a horrible debate. I’m going to vote for Hillary Clinton but I really hope ABC never hosts another debate. THEY SUCKED

Posted by: mikey mike | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

“ABC News’ Sunlen Miller Reports: Senator Barack Obama, D-Ill., both literally and figuratively, tried to brush off a rough performance after Wednesday night’s debate on ABC. ”
The ‘rough performance’ was by Gibson & Stephanopoulos! God, how do those morons keep their jobs?

Posted by: Charles Cates | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

ABC’s handling of this “debate” marked a new low in American elections “news.”
There was no debate, no chance for the candidates to debate. There was just a series of hostile, “gotcha” interrogations. There was a bitterness in ABC’s approach that was truly disgusting.
Stephanopoulous’ behavior was shameful; Gibson was vile. It was as though he had taken off his habitual mask of objectivity and reason, and shown us a monster.
I have been a working journalist for 39 years. I had not thought it possible to be further appalled by the behavior of my fellow journalists, but your performance has made be realize that, when it comes to the sad decline of our profession, the bottom has yet to be reached.
Shame on you!
TD Allman

Posted by: TD Allman | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Quanyin- No one is persecuting as you stated in your comment “yet another black man”. Obama just sucked last night. Get over it.

Posted by: Dear Quanyin | April 17, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Clinton looked like she was given a shot of some kind of joy juice prior to coming onto the stage. Clinton…America’s “ugly” Eva Peron.

Posted by: Mitch | April 17, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

what a JOKE this debate was, lets have george (stephaclinton) attack obama for the first hour and never attack hillary!! ABC NEWS? is a joke!! did Sean Hanity give you your questions?? I will NEVER watch ABC NEWS again!!

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Why would anyone want to spend 2 hours listening to overly rehearsed responses to so-called “important issues?” Charlie and George did us all a favor by giving us the chance to see if the dem candidates were ready to go toe-to-toe with John McCain. They not only showed us that they were not, they proved they couldn’t dance well either.

Posted by: Bob Strong | April 17, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Obama is a clown. He has made his share of cutting comments against Hillary and he has tossed in there half-truths and lies. Why is he so arrogant and in need of an attitude change. He has no backbone and will be bad for America. Hillary in ’08.

Posted by: Kris | April 17, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

THIS DEBATE WAS PRO-HILARY AND TOTALLY AGAINST SENATOR BARACK OBAMA. SHAME ON ABC NEWS CHANNEL. HOW COME THEY NEVER MENTIONED THE MARK PENN SCANDAL ABOUT THE COLUMBIAN TRADE AGREEMENT,AND THE PARDONS THAT EX-PRESIDENT CLINTON GAVE TO TERRORISTS, AND THE LONG DIRTY LIST OF CONSTRIBUTERS TO THE CLINTONS LIBRARY, AND THE MONICA LEWINSKY SCANDAL AND THE ASSOCIATION WITH BILLYGRAHAM-WHO MADE NASTY RACIAL REMARKS AGAINST JEWS AT THE WHITE HOUSE.

Posted by: JASMINE | April 17, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

This debate last night was an insult to the american people. ABC news let the american people down. We needed a debate on the issue’s but we got trash politics. Charlie and George, I expected more out of you, perhaps you should go work for FOX News were this type of thing is expected.

Posted by: Common Sense | April 17, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

45 minutes?
We’ve been waiting for 15 months to see if Obama has a real plan. We didn’t get anything substantial. Is that the politics we want? Is that the hope we want?

Posted by: golfgirlusa | April 17, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

This debate last night was an insult to the american people. ABC news let the american people down. We needed a debate on the issue’s but we got trash politics. Charlie and George, I expected more out of you, perhaps you should go work for FOX News were this type of thing is expected.

Posted by: Common Sense | April 17, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

I understand that this contest can get personal and there will be many attacks. But what I witness last night was an ambush. I have awoke to ABC for years but I will no longer support their new organization. I had my 13 year old daughter watch and she kept asking why are the host attacking him. ABC you are better than that. Charlie Gibson you have lost my respect.

Posted by: Hopefull | April 17, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Great debate. Finally the mainstream media were fair to both candidates and didn’t tip toe around Obama’s dirty laundry. I was unimpressed with him and was surprised at how well Hillary did – she’s made of tough stuff because I know most women would have fell apart by now after the way NBC/MSNBC/CNN have been going after her.
Again, great job ABC.

Posted by: Jeannie | April 17, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

It wasn’t a debate, it was a puerile circle jerk for clueless Beltway bubbleboys.
Wake up, morons. The American public aren’t interested in this crap. You’ve destroyed your credibility.

Posted by: B Bigelow | April 17, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

That debate was garbage.

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

“They fall in step with most of the other media out there helping in the persecution of yet another black man.”
———–
What is wrong with you Obama people? You play the race card to death and then cry about it.

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

What a joke. ABC did a horrible job with this debate and did nothing to help undecided voters. It as if George and Charlie are the “politics of old” and played right to it.

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Thank-you Charlie and George. It’s about time we see a real debate. It was time someone stepped up to the plate and asked Obama the questions a lot of us wanted answered. Clinton didn’t attack him, she out-debated him. He appeared surprised and annoyed. The press has given him a free ride until now, and he was completely befuddled. And when given the chance to discuss the issues he stammered and talked in circles. And now his arrogance won’t allow him to admit…he lost.Trying to be Mr. Nice guy PALEEEZE.

Posted by: Lauri | April 17, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

-shame on you abc news. Instead of asking productive questions about health care, crime, Iraq, private school loans that stopped being issued by most lenders, social security and other important issues. time was spent on george the idot and charles gibson the clown making a mockery of themselves with foolish questions about wright, bosnia, flags. this explain from west to east to north and south and everywhere this debate has been criticized all over the country by people and various media outlets. Over 15,000 comments with American people complaining about a lousy job by two clowns. this dabate was bias toward obam,a and has only show that he is a strong candiate because he could take many punches ans still stand strong in the ring and not fall like mike tyson

Posted by: emmanuel cesar | April 17, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

To: E.R.B.
Good Luck with your boycott – we can’t even get Americans to boycott Exxon Mobil
To: Happy Idiot Talk
Pack up – your plane leaves in an hour
To: Tired of Politics
Ditto – Obama and Bush have something in common
To: Nerakami
Thank you ! I tho’t I was the only one that noticed.

Posted by: Annette | April 17, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

The ABC debate was pathetic. Maybe the last chance to see these two face to face to discuss the important issues and this is what we got. More dumbing down of America. It was disgusting.

Posted by: EARSAZ | April 17, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Obamanites should be thankful that he was not questioned more on the real issues or he would have been..uh..uh..I agree with Senator Clinton.lol..Without a teleprompter he is nothing but an empty suit who is trying to mamble words that does not even answer the questions. Hillary was knowledgeable..she explained what she will do and how she will do it when she becomes the president. Obama looked so irritated and kept on saying “AS I SAID BEFORE”. Come on now. Brush it off all you can but the American people just saw the side of you that is not fit to become the POTUS.

Posted by: jaxhertz | April 17, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

God help us. If Obama is elected, we will have four years of listening to Obama supporters whine and cry racism at every turn. Hillary or McCain. NO WHINERS in the WHITE HOUSE.

Posted by: No Thanks | April 17, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

You go ABC!!! It is important to see how a candidate handles himself or herself under pressure. That’s why the questions were important. Obama has not been tested and gets uncomfortable and stutters when he is asked a tough question. The Republicans will have him for lunch!! He’s not ready for primetime.
ABC did Americans a great service by pointing out his weaknesses.

Posted by: Susan | April 17, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

nice try to spin away ABC’s bullcrap ridiculous debate. The breeze you feel is Pater Jennings spinning in his grave. George & Charlie owe AMERICA an apology!
Tough questions my butt … the tough questions are HOW ARE WE GOING TO GET OUT OF THE BUSH CHENEY CREATED MESS!!!!!!!

Posted by: Doreen | April 17, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Where are the Obama supporters? You think they’d be upset over last night’s horrible performance by Obama. I see a lot of anti-ABC folks today. Ant-Charlie and anti-George people? Anyone? Does anyone know if moveon.org far left wing fruit cakes like anything?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Gibson and Stephonopolous were complete hacks. They brought their agenda along — no tax increases, cut capital gains taxes on Disney execs and staff, the war in Iraq is doing just well, etc, etc, etc. It was an abolute disgrace that with thousands dead in Iraq and our county trilions in debt as the economy in atters and the Chinese ready come in and mop up all our national assest the moderators focused on flag pins, Pastor Wright, Bosnia, and some rehashed news on 60s radicals. There was some good on the night, I was able to program my cable to lock ABC out as I channel surf. No more ABC!!!! Gibson is a disgrace and should be fired.

Posted by: GC | April 17, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

I’M GLAD THEY BROUGHT UP THE FLAG LAPEL
gLAD THEY BROUGHT UP WRIGHT
GLAD THEY BROUGHT UP AYERS
I wish they had brought up Louis Farrakhan, why Princeton University has removed Michelle Oboobas thesis on race, and Obamas terrorist ties.
So do a LOT of other Americans, regardless of what you paid Obama bloggers are whining about.

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

If that fiasco was any indication of how ABC, Gibson and George define news or debates, it is no wonder nobody watches your network news. The ABC crew looked like total fools and showed Americans one more time why we need to break up the media.

Posted by: Oakland | April 17, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

I didn’t watch much of the debate because I’ve already seen like 12 of them and all of the previous one on one’s. But is anyone really shocked that this debate was tough on Obama? There has been several stories that erupted since the last debate and most of them were negatives for Obama. Oh, and he is clearly winning this race. Of course they would focus on those negatives. Add in a former Clinton White House Staffer in George S. as a questioner and it makes for a combustible situation.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

I watched the debate yesterday, and I was shocked to see ABC selected George Stephanopolos as a moderator for a debate involving Senator Clinton. A debate moderator needs to be neutral in order to maintain the integrity of the debate. The fact that he worked not only as one of Bill Clinton’s top campaign aides, but served on former President Clinton’s Cabinet should have immediately disqualified him. He has long ties to the Clintons, and clearly cannot meet the appearance of neutrality. The Debate was a sham. Shame on you ABC!

Posted by: Christian | April 17, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

ABC must fire Charlie G. and George S. for their debate performance.

Posted by: Lance Ford | April 17, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

PamsDisgustedbyABC
Pams is alias for Bill O’Reilly

Posted by: Annette | April 17, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Brush the haters off!! LOFL!!! Seriously, the only reason people are still upset about the Wright issue are. A: They are still formulating a misguided opinion based on eight second soundbites taken from an “amazing” preacher’s sermon. Or, B: Your just pissed he wont throw his preacher, or his beliefs under a bus in order to become president. Unlike so many other amazing candidates that will say anything to appease your ignorant behinds. Oh, and you are considered a hater if you write blogs based on faulty theories, lacking facts or logic.

Posted by: clarenceg20 | April 17, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Obama supporters sure are bitter on here. You need to go hug your guns or go to church…ooops, sorry. You’re Obama supporters, forgot you don’t like guns or church.
You people have lost it. Stop blaming George and Charles for actually doing their job. If Obama wants to be President, he has to withstand tough questions. If he wins the nomination, things will just get tougher. The free ride from the likes of MSNBC is over.

Posted by: Caroline | April 17, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

PamsDisgustedbyABC
Pams is alias for Bill O’Reilly

Posted by: Annette | April 17, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Boycotting Disney would be like boycotting air. They have wrapped their animated tentacles all across the globe.
If you truly wanted to make a difference, financially support your candidate or campaign for them in a productive way. CLINTON in 2008.

Posted by: Mary Santos | April 17, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

PamsDisgustedbyABC – The republicans like Obama’s performance so much last night they say:
9:19 pm ET: A Republican strategist offers this, to ABC’s Karen Travers: “I think we’re going to buy 90 minute infomercials in October to replay this . . . I can’t believe Obama’s answer on Ayers. It’s like he never even considered the question. Doesn’t he do debate prep?! His answer was so bad/wrong/misleading/offensive – it’s going to be a huge problem for him . . .”

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Charlie and George did a good and fair job. It’s unfortunate that certain people can’t seem to see Barack Obama for what he is. An elite, snobbish, looking down his nose, know-nothing. He can orate…so can the leader of Iran and other leaders that would like to do away with our country. I’ll take somebody, anybody, that has some experience other than a slick tongue and riding the band wagon of white guilt. I want take that trip myself.

Posted by: king42 | April 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Haha – ABC finally got to ask tough questions to BHO and he did not have a clue how to answer it. Comeon Barack you are in the big leagues now and should handle his well. Ofcourse He has zero experience and a whole lot of baggage. All he can use is a prepared speech which would crown him his next messiah.
We need a Fighter not a talker in the white house

Posted by: Indus | April 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

I can see now Obama supporters just don’t want to see the truth about their candidate.
They don’t like people call them Blind folded either.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

ABC should be totally ashamed for its slanted and totally unprofessional performance. George S. used a question that he took from Sean Hannity….Gibson sounded like he took his questions directly from the McCain handbook. Will they, as the rest of the media has,continue give McCain a free and easy ride? Or will they get “a set” and ask him important questions like….His putting on knee pads to Parsley and Haggie. I doubt it.
Both men had some stature as journalists; but, they will have to work long and hard to regain any sense
of respect. To that point….you just lost me as a viewer. I will go elsewhere.

Posted by: Michael | April 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

I am deeply disappointed in two journalists I have previously watched and admired. What they created with their insipid approach insulted both candidates as well as intelligent viewers interested in real issues. Lapel pins again? Please. What the ABC newsmen created wasn’t in any sense a debate. A new form of “reality” TV, maybe. But enough already of that, too.

Posted by: cyberteach | April 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Trash journalism again. Apparently, ABC has decided that “tough” questions include asking McCain about adultery, bringing up his friendship with the North Vietnamese captors and his propaganda tapes, asking if he is baptized, and why he can’t seem to know who we are fighting in Iraq. Oops…that last question might be one the American people are interested in, so we aren’t apt to see it.
We won’t see them ask the other questions either – the network only takes it cues from right wing gossip and rumor mongers. . .and then decides THAT is what the American people has on its mind.
It’s too bad they didn’t ask Hillary what she thought about being endorsed by Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. . .I think Democrats would have been very interested in that answer.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | April 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Obama is pathetic. Maybe he should go home and lick his wounds. Thank you, Hillary, for staying in the fight and allowing me to weigh in on the election during the West Virginia primary on May 13th. It will be a rare privilege!

Posted by: WV-DC | April 17, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Poor Obama….asked such tough questions!! But we would like to know why he hangs with terrorists, why his mentor is a racist, why he stereotypes white people, why he disses the values of small-town folk, why he loves abortion, why he spouts socialism, why he hates America!!!!!

Posted by: Mark | April 17, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I apologize…I won’t take that trip.

Posted by: king42 | April 17, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I compared the debate last night with Geraldo let’s see what’s in Al Capone’s vault show. Everybody’s hyped to see it and then there was nothing in the vault but old moonshine bottles.
A major disappointment at best.

Posted by: Verity | April 17, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Horrible! Its ok to ask these questions but they have been asked and answered several several times before. Jesus back off already and deal with the real issues

Posted by: natalue | April 17, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I’m reading the comments and it sounds like 2 or 3 Obama people are typing them all – very similar patterns.
I’m setting my DVR to George’s Sunday show in support of his GUTS for doing his job last night. It was a great debate, very fair. Obama’s lack of experience showed. Don’t blame ABC if he wasn’t prepared.

Posted by: MG | April 17, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

When I watched the past debates, I cringed everytime Sen. Clinton was asked tough questions. Last night, I cringed twice as much – Both Sen Clinton and Cen Obama were asked tough questions. Good job ABC!

Posted by: Outsider | April 17, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

ABC is disgusting with the way its anchors handled the debate. Why did you assign Stephanopoulous o
to be one of the moderators? Common sense dictate that you should have avoided this conflict of interest.
Even you online site is biased against Obama, the way Tapper is writing his blogs — it’s plain to see the bias.

Posted by: Pierce | April 17, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

ABC is disgusting with the way its anchors handled the debate. Why did you assign Stephanopoulous o
to be one of the moderators? Common sense dictate that you should have avoided this conflict of interest.
Even you online site is biased against Obama, the way Tapper is writing his blogs — it’s plain to see the bias.

Posted by: Pierce | April 17, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

McCarthyism, all the way. Obama was totally dignified. I will never watch ABC news again.

Posted by: Amber | April 17, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Wasn’t Britney Spears available to moderate the debate. At least then ABC would have gotten a ‘tabloid two-fer’.

Posted by: daryl | April 17, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Dear ABC News,
I can not believe the way you allowed bozo brothers, Charlie and George, to completely ruin the “debate.” I have never seen a “moderator” interrupt a candidate more often or with such zeal. It was as if the “moderators” were also in the debate and makes me wonder who really pays the bills at ABC. Congrats on your conservative attack.

Posted by: joe | April 17, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

I KNOW that you can’t really believe that he was brushing off a “tough debate”. You cant be that dumb….
He was brushing off the Bull Sh!! yall were disguising as questions or interest!
Now the entire WORLD knows that abc news is a tabloid news station with no real journalists!

Posted by: Strong | April 17, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Dear ABC News,
I can not believe the way you allowed bozo brothers, Charlie and George, to completely ruin the “debate.” I have never seen a “moderator” interrupt a candidate more often or with such zeal. It was as if the “moderators” were also in the debate and makes me wonder who really pays the bills at ABC. Congrats on your conservative attack.

Posted by: joe | April 17, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Paris Hilton would do a better job. Lapel Pins- there is an economic crisis a war and a lot of pain and you are worried about lapel pins!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Brownste | April 17, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Very disappointed in both George and Charlie! I hope the George and Fox News thing is not true.
They lowered themselves to and the worst part was the lack of substance, so we all suffered.
No one won!
Spin all you want!

Posted by: REALLY? | April 17, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Bush and Cheney and Rove are outraged that Obama doesn’t wear a flag pin. Americans will not stand for that kind of disrespect – while at least 50% of them.
The election is over, McCain wins!

Posted by: Bill | April 17, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Yesterday’s debate in Philadelphia was the worst that I have ever seen in my life. An amateur attempt by two horrible amatuers, fit for the ‘Fair and Balanced’ network. Digging on irrelevant trash rather than substance, they trivialized the nature of the problems this country faces. In particular Stephanopoulos showed he is still a Clinton hack, masquerading as an impartial, objective (albeit a third rate) journalist.
Abe

Posted by: Abraham Verghese | April 17, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

I think, at this point, it would be in the public interest for ABC News to just refrain from covering the presidential campaign of all parties this year.
My own journalism background tells me it displays too obvious a conflict of interest and is incapable of representing the issues for the American people.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | April 17, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Oh, by the way, GUNS SUCK!!! They are meant for one thing only, death. Many other great nations do not allow handguns, and they are doing just fine. SInce you bible belt brethren’s love the good book so much, maybe you should abide by the great commandment. “Thou shall not Kill”
Oh but who am i kidding? How are we supposed to make millions off of people if we cant sell handguns to sociopaths and the average joe at gun shows and walmart? Hunting? Who the hell needs to hunt nowadays? EVOLUTION!!! STOP TRYING TO FIGHT IT BILLY BOB!

Posted by: clarenceg20 | April 17, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

God help us. If Obama is elected, we will have four years of listening to Obama supporters whine and cry racism at every turn. Hillary or McCain. NO WHINERS in the WHITE HOUSE.

Posted by: NO WHINERS | April 17, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

I just took ABC News seriously for the last time. I hope the wretched excuse for journalism on display last night at least shuts up the Hillary camps endless whining about media bias.

Posted by: Steve | April 17, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Debate what debate? Where were the issues?
It’s evident that George and Charlie don’t watch CNN, they’ve beaten the Wright story to death. Enough already!
Perhaps Walter Chronkite can come out of retirement for the next debate and ask tough and unbiased questions about issues that Americans care about — Iraq, Afghanistan, Jobs, Education, the Economy, Environment, Housing, Gas Prices, Immigration, Terrorism, Drugs…should I go on?

Posted by: Darlene | April 17, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Bringing up things like “the pastor” and “bitter” and running it over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over is essential to Fox News, MSNBC, CNN and others. They are 24-hour news networks, and since there isn’t enough real news or quality news to cover in a 24 hour period every single day, they need to dwell on these non-issues to fill up space and ultimately sell advertising time. There are just too many players in the game, many of them amateur at best, all competing with each other. The goal is not truth. The game is, whomever manufactures the most issues and screams the loudest, wins. And the reason it continues, is because many of you reading these words right now buy into this garbage and fuel their fire. Stop staring at the sun. It’s blinding you and you can no longer see the difference between what matters and what is manufactured.

Posted by: Patreekio | April 17, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

To MG – will you and George have your flag lapel pins on? Americans will be breathlessly sitting on the edge of their seats wondering. . .

Posted by: kevinbgoode | April 17, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

ABC still has news?

Posted by: mark | April 17, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

This is why Princeton won’t release her thesis…..
Michelle Obama:”"There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost. ”
What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she’s first lady that will elevate black over white in America ?
This is who you nutjobs want in the White House? She attends a racist church with a black nationalist preacher, has ties with the NOI etc. and wants segregation?
You have got to be kidding me.

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I have tryed all my 47 years not to HATE white people, but after last night it becomes more and more difficult.That was just terrible the way they won PA for Clinton. I am very disapointed in the American people. May God have MERCY on YOU! And that’s rught Obama like JAY-Z said,”BRUSH THAT DIRT IFF YOUR SHOULDER”!

Posted by: Emilianna | April 17, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

ABC, what a waste of time. If you get this chance again, try to use it to speak about real issues. Charlie and George- bad judgement on your 3 am moment.

Posted by: Mike | April 17, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I have sat through every single debate and felt cheated every time, because it was clear that the people asking the questions were determined to keep Senator Clinton from being president. Last night I thought it would probably be more of the same from ABC. I was pleasantly surprised to see ABC have the guts to actually question Obama. The rest of the media have pretty much treated him like the second coming.

Posted by: Dolly | April 17, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Obama was talking about his own supporters BITTER BITTER BITTER you all sound like a bunch of whiny kindergarteners blaming ABC for his failure to deliver last night. Bravo ABC.

Posted by: Jake | April 17, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

we should thank you to ABC which is the only network is so brave and love the country so much.
They asked those questions about terrorist etc because they care about America, don’t you think?
Good jobs Charlie, George..

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

I have always watched Gibson on the evening news and George on his Sunday morning show and like them both but the kinds of questions they asked in the first part of the debat were shameful and petty. I guess even good news people can fall to petty politics. I thought they were better than that.

Posted by: C.J. | April 17, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Thank Goodness that Charlie and George finally challenged Obama. He has gotten this far by not having to answer the tough questions and we see how well he does under pressure. This man is not ready to be president.

Posted by: Reality08 | April 17, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Grow up people!!!! Obama was just surprised to be asked all those questions because he thought he would get a free ride all the way thru August thus the irritation and the blabbing. Obama supporters are ready to beat anyone to death for your beloved cult leader Obama. Obamanites are just mad because he looked like a fool without a teleprompter. He uhh..uh.uhh sounded like Bush under pressure. Psst…Obama, people from Iran are actually called Iranians not Iranies..Obama is a joke. Get use to it. Hillary rocked last night.

Posted by: jaxhertz | April 17, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

OH AND BY THE WAY I JUST CANCELED ABC FROM MY TIVO , AND I ALSO SWITCHED TO BARACK OBAMA, HILLARY WITCH LIAR CLINTON LOST MY VOTE.
OBAMA 08

Posted by: JASMINE | April 17, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

You are actually trying to spin this as Senator Obama trying to do damage control after a “rough debate”? Journalists and citizens across the political spectrum are denouncing the so called “debate” last night. Instead of confronting the egregious broadcast and at least considering the worth of the criticisms, you are continuing to attack Senator Obama? At this moment ABC News seems hard to distinguish from Fox. Someone said that Peter Jennings must be spinning in his grave. Any responsible journalist would be appalled at what happened last night. You are doing yourselves no good by taking this tack.

Posted by: Kathrn Levy | April 17, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Tough debate? It was a disgrace. ABC is the one trying to brush off criticism.

Posted by: Nota Name | April 17, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Just wanted to send comments regarding the debate. I was dissapointed. I am a thoughtful person who cares abour real issues and getting things done. The questions and content of the debate were more more of a gossip and gotcha type issues. For someone who grew up through Vietnam, Watergate, etc… I typically admire the press for getting to the issues while politicians try to avoid the hard subjects and facts. Last night, i saw the reversal. Journalists (i.e. “entertainers?) asked irrelevant questions and are actually getting the public off track. One candiate (Obama) was steadfast, honest, and wanted to talk issues. Keep doing what you are doing and we will have more George Bushes and less Abraham Lincoln’s, FDR’s, JFK’s, etc….
Deeply dissapointed with ABC and this debate.

Posted by: Douglas DeCarolis | April 17, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

ABC: Apologize or fire Tweedle Dum & Dee debate moderators. I and many other will not turn on ABC for news again. It isn’t just that they were biased against Obama, it’s that they acted like National Enquirer reporters rather than real journalists.

Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Just wanted to send comments regarding the debate. I was dissapointed. I am a thoughtful person who cares abour real issues and getting things done. The questions and content of the debate were more more of a gossip and gotcha type issues. For someone who grew up through Vietnam, Watergate, etc… I typically admire the press for getting to the issues while politicians try to avoid the hard subjects and facts. Last night, i saw the reversal. Journalists (i.e. “entertainers?) asked irrelevant questions and are actually getting the public off track. One candiate (Obama) was steadfast, honest, and wanted to talk issues. Keep doing what you are doing and we will have more George Bushes and less Abraham Lincoln’s, FDR’s, JFK’s, etc….
Deeply dissapointed with ABC and this debate.

Posted by: Doug | April 17, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

How very sad ABC news cannot afford some qualified journalists. Charlie should be waring the Mickey Mouse suit at Disney World and Georgie Boy should take up fishing in the Adriactic Sea.
This calculated against B.O. is outrageous and inexcusable. I used to watch Georgie Boy on Sundays but after his biased and mindless performance you would have to put a gun to my head.
HRC is pathetic and a loser. All they care about is money and power.
North Carolina is Obama’s firewall. This is where it finally ends for Clinton’s Used Car Sales.

Posted by: Chris | April 17, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Obama should immediately drop out of the race.. He’s not just unelectable; he’s becoming a joke! I found his constant stumbling and fumbling annoying.

Posted by: DMK | April 17, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

The golden boy got some hard questions last night and could not handle it…what is he going to do in Novemeber. How come Hillary has been taking all this heat, and nobody sees her sweating..Isn’t this woman amazing..

Posted by: Soheila Navai | April 17, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

The debate was a farce. I don’t agree with Senator Obama on every issue but I do agree with his trying to have the campaign deal with issues and not personal attacks and sordid gossip. Hillary is a reincarnation of Karl Rove and she is blinded by her overwhelming ambition. She keeps going like she has been and John McCain will win in November. Charlie and George should be ashamed of themselves and George should not have been there since he used to work for the Clintons – talk about conflict of interest and lack of journalistic ethics.

Posted by: Susie | April 17, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

I was appalled by the way you treated Barack Obama last night. You acted like gunslingers out for a “hit”, going over ground that he had covered in the press already. It was almost an entire night or “gotcha”, and you paid no attention to his desire to stay at a higher level than the two of you were able to do. You became part of the problem with the press…always looking for something sensational that would put a feather in your caps. I thought you both were above that kind of cheap play, but you were not. Back to Tim Russert on Sunday for my wife and me. And Gibson, you tried to look so erudite with your horned-rims (sic): that didn’t work either.

Posted by: wjkaschub | April 17, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Obama will be the democratic nominee. Hillary is toast and she can go on romantic cruises with her devoted husband, Bill. She wins Pa—big deal! He wins big in N.C. the following week and Indiana is a toss up meaning no gain for Hillary. It is over folks!

Posted by: rockychance | April 17, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

“FairytaleGate”, FlagpinGate”, MLK/Lyndon JohnsonGate”, “Tax ReturnsGate”, MonicaGate”, “Rev. WrightGate”, “Jesse Jackson Comparison Gate”, “BosniaGate”, ChelseaGate” are all distractions by the MEDIA (print, TV Networks, Cable, Sunday Morning Talk Shows, Cable Talk Shows, etc. to defeat the Democrats. We supporters of both candidates should not have bought into it and look what we have now President McCain – the Media’s Darling – he received a standing ovation at the AP’s Annual Luncheon on Monday and Sen. Obama didn’t. They don’t call him out on his flip flopping on the issues (ex. h2O boarding).
The issues should have been debated/reported not these nonsense.
Thanks and well said Raflin and Media For McCain.
Democrats let’s stop this in fighting and join together to defeat the media and the republicans in November.

Posted by: The Debster DC | April 17, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

To Obama Supporters:
You are representing your candidate is a very negative way by attacking & whining. Having to defend your candidate makes him look weaker & less presidential. Instead of looking like Obamamammas running out to the playground to frantically bandage his scraped ego or like a student who blames the teacher for a poor grade — instead do this:
Start articulating the cold, hard reasons why Obama should become the Democratic nominee & how he is better suited to WIN against the Republicans in 2008. Stay positive, hopeful and stress how he will bring unity. Do not use foul language or throw insults at Clinton.
Intellectually, not emotionally, post why you believe his HEALTH CARE PLAN is superior, why you believe his ECONOMIC REFORM will help Americans faster, why you believe his FOREIGN AID expertise will outshine Hillary’s and why you have faith that he is the candidate who will bring home our soldiers from IRAQ more quickly/safely than CLINTON.
Obama might have had a rough debate last night, but this wave of immaturity only adds more salt to his wound. Democrat in 2008.

Posted by: Carlos | April 17, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

ABC=ClintonNews,
What’s an insult to the intellectual capacity of the American people is NOT ABC, BUT Obama! He and his bogus change…

Posted by: DMK | April 17, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

” have tryed all my 47 years not to HATE white people, but after last night it becomes more and more difficult.”
Posted by: Emilianna | Apr 17, 2008 5:57:35 PM
_______________
Screw you, you racist pig. Go join th Naiton of Islam and give your stiff arm salute. We are trying to get past it and bigots like you are in the way. Go get some help before you hurt someone.

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Hillary “vast right-wing conspiracy, bimbo eruption” Clinton supporters are making the claim that Obama whines?
Really?!
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Posted by: Farkas | April 17, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

If you assume all the questions were appropriate, why were the ones on substance and policy…things that matter like the economy and war and peace…left to the end? That is, at a minimum, lack of balance and perspective for two respected national news persons.

Posted by: Tim | April 17, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Wow, lots of comments on this issue and I am not surprised. ABC news has really lowered their standards and their level of professional ethics. Even today, ABC still can not accurately report their own lack of professionalism last night. How delusional. Just say it…… you made a bad call and did a bad job last night. ABC, may be a time to do a POLL ON YOURSELF!! believe me Americans want to respond after that tabloid style performance

Posted by: intritybringsserinity | April 17, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

This will go down in history as the trap that was smelled out by the American people
even the headline on the Main page is Obama brushes off debate
but when you open the article it is switched to Obama attempts to brush off debate Kind of like showing up to a debate, but than your opponents Hubsband’s former advisor pops out of a cake to attack you?
Just answer that one question ABC, is Clinton’s advisor someone that is appropriate for facilitating a debate?

Posted by: evan | April 17, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

I was disgusted listening to Charles and George sounding more like a tabloid reporter than a debate moderator. I didn’t expect to see fair treatment of the 2 candidates by Gibson, he displayed a deplorable level of hypocrisy and bigotry in pontificating sanctimonious self-righteous diatribes criticizing John Kerry back in ’04 referring to him as ‘a fake heroe’ – who courageously served in active duty at ground zero in the Vietnam War … Who was awarded the “Bronze Star, Silver Star and three Purple Hearts for combat duty as a Navy lieutenant in Vietnam.”
But, ABC has sunk to a new low with me. I’d like to know how the 2 candidates are going to address our looming federal deficits, our rising health care costs, food costs – but, Charles and George only seem to care about flag pins, and past associates.
SHAME ON ABC, GIBSON AND STEPHANOPOLOUS – YOU CALL YOURSELVES JOURNALISTS???????

Posted by: ABCNoise | April 17, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

A well-placed friend of mine told me the Justice Dept. is actually investigating ABC and the Clinton campaign to see if there was collusion on the debate content. This will be interesting.

Posted by: Rob | April 17, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

It’s clear that ABC News has instructed its newsmen to be water-carriers for the Republican Party. Rather than a real debate about important issues, the first 45 minutes of the debate dealt with phony issues trumpeted by Republicans, and done under the guise of the pseudo-issue of “electability.” I won’t bother to turn to ABC News next time I want to hear a discussion of the real issues facing the American people in this election.

Posted by: Dan Bivona | April 17, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

I am a Hillary supporter, but even I was apalled at the questions directed at Obama last night. My god, Gibson and Stepha (whatever his name is) embarrassed themselves. Shame on them.

Posted by: Stephanie Pfister | April 17, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

ABC moderators in the debate were unfair in the time they devoted to inflammatory questions for one of the candidates. A rough analysis of the content of the trascript would show a 5-1 or 10-1 bias.
So, the question naturally arises as to what their agenda was.
Why doesn’t ABC do a poll on the public perceptions of the moderators’ desperately partisan performance?
Don’t we have just as much right to know about the biases of the moderators who set the question agenda as those of the candidates forced to answer the questions?
Or does ABC renounce any reaponsibility or accountability to the public?

Posted by: lion723 | April 17, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Bad arrogant loser.

Posted by: Georg | April 17, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

ABC moderators in the debate were unfair in the time they devoted to inflammatory questions for one of the candidates. A rough analysis of the content of the trascript would show a 5-1 or 10-1 bias.
So, the question naturally arises as to what their agenda was.
Why doesn’t ABC do a poll on the public perceptions of the moderators’ desperately partisan performance?
Don’t we have just as much right to know about the biases of the moderators who set the question agenda as those of the candidates forced to answer the questions?
Or does ABC renounce any reaponsibility or accountability to the public?

Posted by: lion723 | April 17, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

The only thing tough about that debate was enduring it. Regardless of whichever candidate, if any, you may support, no one…no one…should be supporting the kind of tripe that ABC put on last night. Gibson and Stephanpolous are capable of doing far better and it’s a shame ABC went down the route that they did. Debates are supposed to raise the conversation, not lower it.

Posted by: Macam | April 17, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Thank you ABC THANK YOU Finally someone is asking the questions so that we may get to know the REAL Obama finally and to see how he will he handle himself when hit with the really hard questions and realities that are facing all of us this is the response we will get at 3am……thank you

Posted by: ann | April 17, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Obama is clueless and so are his followers. It’a amazing and scary how easily so many Americans have fallen right in line with Obama’s false promises. Is it just me or are the Obama supporters so brain washed that it really doesn’t matter what bad things he’s done in the past?
He could kill somebody in the middle of Times Square tomorrow in broad daylight and they would make excuses for him.
This whole thing has the makings of a bad movie. I just hope for our countries sake that the good guy wins!
It’s too bad we only have 1 good option as our hereo!

Posted by: SV | April 17, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Obama’s campaign has been sending out emails, urging people to complain about the debate…lol Obama – A change you can’t believe in!

Posted by: DMK | April 17, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Awful job moderating the debate- my wife and I sat on the couch last night absolutely disgusted with the infinite line of questioning. There is much more substance to this election!!!

Posted by: NC voter | April 17, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

HOW ABOUT ALL OF YOU CRY BABIES THAT SAY YOU ARE NEVER GOING TO WATCH ABC AGAIN LEAVE THE FORUM IF YOU’RE SO DISGUSTED?
Hypocrites, liars. You’re not going to do anything of the sort. You just can’t handle the truth, he sucks.

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Yea, I bet ABC/FOX would like to brush off the disgusting performance of their two Fox shill moderators last night.
ABC = FOX hate news.

Posted by: TL | April 17, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Obama expects everyone, including ABC NEWS, to bow to him. He has a koolaid drinking cult not asking him specifics. Sorry if the rest of the country is too smart for the liberal lunatics. ABC News finally asked Obama a question about his judgment. He has claimed he has 12 years of helping the small peoplek, but he seems to be helping only anti-American radicals. For those who want to stop free speech, to suppress the FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS of Charlie Gibson to actually dare ask LORD OBAMA a question. then shame on you. Obama is an empty suit. He has never ever given anything specific. He has surrounded himself with haters. Thankfully, someone finally didn’t spend an entire debate asking Obama if he was comfortable.
OBAMA IS A CRY BABY. THE LIBERAL MEDIA WANTS US TO GO ALONG WITH THE OBAMA BANDWAGON. DON’T LET THEM STIFLE YOUR RIGHT TO DISSENT AGAINST THE OBAMA McCARTYITES.

Posted by: karen | April 17, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Obama expects everyone, including ABC NEWS, to bow to him. He has a koolaid drinking cult not asking him specifics. Sorry if the rest of the country is too smart for the liberal lunatics. ABC News finally asked Obama a question about his judgment. He has claimed he has 12 years of helping the small peoplek, but he seems to be helping only anti-American radicals. For those who want to stop free speech, to suppress the FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS of Charlie Gibson to actually dare ask LORD OBAMA a question. then shame on you. Obama is an empty suit. He has never ever given anything specific. He has surrounded himself with haters. Thankfully, someone finally didn’t spend an entire debate asking Obama if he was comfortable.
OBAMA IS A CRY BABY. THE LIBERAL MEDIA WANTS US TO GO ALONG WITH THE OBAMA BANDWAGON. DON’T LET THEM STIFLE YOUR RIGHT TO DISSENT AGAINST THE OBAMA McCARTYITES.

Posted by: karen | April 17, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

I hope Obama sticks it to ABC for this travesty when it comes time to debate McCain. Hopefully NBC or CBS will get the big debates, and the sponsors. It will teach ABC a lesson. They should not be so frivolous with such grave concerns as the issues of the day.
The were no hot button issues here, only hot button innuendoes and tabloid gossip.
Hillary had her phoney stewardess smile pasted on her face all night.

Posted by: benny_franklin | April 17, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

SELECT ma.last_name mgr_last,
ma.first_name mgr_first,
INITCAP(ma.job_title) mgr_title ,
ma.department_name,
job.empno,
job.lname,
job.fname,
job.title,
job.hm_phone,
job.mob_phone,
job.address_1,
job.city,
job.state
–ma.manager_employee_id,
FROM global_employee m, global_employee ma,
( SELECT j.empno,
j.lname,
j.fname,
j.title,
j.hm_phone,
j.mob_phone,
j.address_1,
j.city,
j.state,
j.end_date,
j.manager_global_emp_id
FROM asi_hr_jobshop j, global_employee m
WHERE m.manager_global_emp_id = j.manager_global_emp_id
–AND m.manager_global_emp_id = 2268
AND j.empno = m.employee_id
AND j.end_date IS NULL ) job
WHERE to_char(lpad(m.manager_employee_id,
8,
0)) = ma.employee_id
–AND ma.last_name LIKE ‘Ch%’
AND ma.employment_status IN (’1′,
‘Temporary(onpayroll)’,
‘Regular’)
–AND job.empno = m.employee_id
AND m.manager_global_emp_id = job.manager_global_emp_id
GROUP BY ma.last_name, ma.first_name,
ma.job_title ,
ma.department_name,
job.empno,
job.lname,
job.fname,
job.title,
job.hm_phone,
job.mob_phone,
job.address_1,
job.city,
job.state
ORDER BY ma.department_name, ma.last_name — 218 recs

Posted by: ABCNoise | April 17, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

The “debate” was a disgusting display of Gotcha. It was absurd, given all the problems the next president is going to be facing.
What we desperately need to know is, how are you goiong to resolve, and pay for, each one of the country’s problems, and in what order?
The news media are failing us, just the same as local state and federal government, as well as organized religion.
Our broadcast news media have all reverted to entertainment, at a time when we need the Fourth Estate to do the job it is supposed to do.
It had better get better soon, or I may have to leave the country I love. It’s on the brink of total collapse, and all the news media can do is to attack a presidential candidate for the actions of his neighbor and his former pastor, then try to catch the other candidate (again) in one of her many lies. Were they not listening to themselves as those matters were discussed 24/7 during the week prior to the debate?

Posted by: Rick | April 17, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Emiliana will spearhead the riots if her beloved Obama does not win the nomination. She cannot accept the fact that Obama was not ready last night. He did not do his homework therefore he sucked. However it would not really matter whether he does his homework because his not as knowledgeable as Hillary is. I understand Obama’s call for CHANGE, UNITY and all that but those words will not buy me food to eat, pay my mortgage…etc..etc..He is just not the best person to turn this country around and neither is Mccain – he will just continue with the Iraq war and put this country in more debt. Clinton will lead this country to a better tomorrow and hopefully she will be the POTUS for the sake of America and the American people.

Posted by: jaxhertz | April 17, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

The Obama supporters can’t stand it when the true Obama is exposed.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | April 17, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Shame on ABC for allowing Gibson and Stephanopolous to moderate the “debate”. It was God-awful!

Posted by: MLT | April 17, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Obama supporters are acting like sissys,”I hate ABC”, “ABC better apologize”..come on people. Your candidate was asked some tough questions, things the American people have been talking about, and you all freak out. Pathetic. Mccain is gonna smoke this chump. Almost feel bad for you pinkos.

Posted by: jon | April 17, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

“A well-placed friend of mine told me the Justice Dept. is actually investigating ABC and the Clinton campaign to see if there was collusion on the debate content. This will be interesting.”
Posted by: Rob
______________
LOL! Is ther nothing you obama supporters won’t stoop to? HA HA “well placed”!

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Dear ABC News
During the first half of the debate, I tried to imagine the reaction of Peter Jennings to the performance of George and Charlie. At the end of the debate, I was certain that Mr. Jennings would never have allowed this spectacle to happen during his tenure as managing editor. Out of respect for the legacy of Mr. Jennings, I have decided never to watch your broadcast again. After 30 years of loyally watching your broadcasts, I can not continue. I simply no longer trust you.

Posted by: Don | April 17, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

To: sarnorton — You wrote, “I find it amusing and irritating how Obama constantly and consistently gives Hillary a dig for getting digs in to him, all the while pretending and saying that he doesn’t do that because he is a different kind of politician. For instance he has said from the beginning of his campaign that Hillary didn’t have the judgment to be president, all the time he was saying that he wasn’t going to be negative about her. I also found it amusing how he disassociates himself from his campaign as if they don’t represent him. That’s also how he handles his reverend and other questionable relationships. What a hypocrit!! Will the real Obama please stand up.”
~~~I agree with your observation. Obama is always taking jabs at Hillary & then claims he does not & never has. It so blatantly false that it’s rather comical when he does this. Although others have also noticed this, I am glad that you took the time to post your opinion on the internet. Thank you! DEMOCRAT IN 2008.

Posted by: Lynda P. | April 17, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

ABC you got this wrong. Taking questions right out of Hannity’s playbook. Stephy you gave me a reason to sleep in on Sunday and not bother with your show anymore.
I used to kinda respect ABC news, but after that performance by Gibson and Stephy… nope you guys really sucked last night.
Worst questions and moderating I have seen this year. The Dems should have boycotted ABC along with FOX.
And then the headline on this story… please…

Posted by: rb | April 17, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Wow, lots of comments on this issue and I am not surprised. ABC news has really lowered their standards and their level of professional ethics. Even today, ABC still can not accurately report their own lack of professionalism last night. How delusional. Just say it…… you made a bad call and did a bad job last night. ABC, may be a time to do a POLL ON YOURSELF!! believe me Americans want to respond after that tabloid style performance

Posted by: intergritybringsserinty | April 17, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

In these important times the media shows always its true face. The “so-called” debate has proven us how LOW ABC can go. They have surpassed even the FOX news.
BOYCOTT ABC and FOX NEWS. Teach them a DEMOCRATIC lesson.
Prevent them from conducting “hit-jobs”.

Posted by: billyforever | April 17, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

ABC you got this wrong. Taking questions right out of Hannity’s playbook. Stephy you gave me a reason to sleep in on Sunday and not bother with your show anymore.
I used to kinda respect ABC news, but after that performance by Gibson and Stephy… nope you guys really sucked last night.
Worst questions and moderating I have seen this year. The Dems should have boycotted ABC along with FOX.
And then the headline on this story… please…

Posted by: rb | April 17, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Childish behavior. Why not have a good cry. Honestly, he should be ashamed. Pity himself like a baby in order to gain some sympathy!

Posted by: Elisabeth | April 17, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

“have tryed all my 47 years not to HATE white people, but after last night it becomes more and more difficult.”
Posted by: Emilianna | Apr 17, 2008 5:57:35 PM
———-
Typical obama supporter….

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

YOU MUST KNOW THAT GEORGE SAWHATEVER HIS NAME GOT HIS QUESTIONS STRAIGHT FROM SEAN HANNITY. I WAS LISTING TO SEAN HANNITY ON THE RADIO THE NIGHT BEFORE THE DEBATE/WHEN THE MIDGET EMPTY SUIT GEORGE GOT HIS QUESTIONS FROM HANNITY.ITS NOT A RUMOR. HE TOLD SEAN HE WROTE DOWN ALL THE QUESTIONS SEAN WANTED HIM TO ASK/SURE ENOUGH EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM WAS ASKED. WHY DIDN’T HE LET SEAN HANNITY MODERATE THE “FIASCO”/DEBATE/ JUST PLAIN TABLOID NONSENSE

Posted by: JOE | April 17, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Former Clinton aide Stephanopolous dissing O’Bama over his American Flag lapel pin, or lack thereof, was a good metaphor for the way establishment tacticians control the message. While blue collar voters are worked into a lather over which candidate is the most “patriotic,” there is no discussion of how tax burdens and benefits are distributed. Any such discussion is taboo because of the absurd “no new taxes” pledge that emerged following the defeat of George Bush the first. Our political dialog is superficial to an extreme and ABC’s grand inquisitors did little to raise the level of debate.

Posted by: Bill Newberry | April 17, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Waa. Waa. Waa. From the Obama babies. I’m loving it! Great job ABC! Bravo, George! Magnificent, Charlie!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

” The Dems should have boycotted ABC along with FOX.”
——-
Then stop posting in here, hypocrite.

Posted by: Observer | April 17, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

It seems the 4th estate of the fascists reared its head last night…distract, divide, conquer..are the tactics of the beast. Watch out..the demise of the middle class is closer than you think. If you think the last 7 years have been bad, just wait for 100 more years of war that will just bankrupt us a nation..but the right wing fascists will have their warprofits in hand and will not care. We can stuff the genie back in the bottle but it will take all of us. We are the change we’ve been waiting for. Wake up America. It’s smoke and mirrors, the real terrorists are hiding behind their falg pins…

Posted by: MariaWr | April 17, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

I stayed up late to watch this debate. Midway through I went to bed. You wasted my time. Some Americans have to get up and work for a living. Thanks for nothing but repeating petty, political potshots!

Posted by: Mary Mack | April 17, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Cudos to ABC. While it’s not the case “no stone was left unturned” (because there are many, many more floating around online) this was a FIRST – major media brave enough to open the “Pandora’s Box” of Obama’s closet at all. So keep your humor, Charles and George, your efforts at shining some much needed light into that darkness are much appreciated.
As for Obama’s after remarks (above) if they weren’t so manipulative (as ever) they’d just be plain funny:
like “restraining himself” because he is such a good guy and she is a fellow democrat! The only people he could fool there are those blind, deaf and dumb. He has used his campaign rear guard to attack Hillary Clinton, beyond all bounds of decency, for months now. Some Obamanites favorite blogs use the same terms to describe his opponent that usually are vernacular of prison inmates.
Was he also “restraining himself” when never commented nor condemned Randi Rhodes opened an official Obama rally calling the other Pres. candidate a F……W… right over the mike, to much Obama supporter and STAFF applause?
Was he “restraining himself” when he bitterly complained (after one of his own outed his SF remarks) that there wasn’t supposed to be any press there or he’d never have talked that way?
Is he “restraining himself” now by ignoring, as usual, the condemnation of a chief supporter, Rev. Eric Leeks of LA, who recently verbally assaulted a Jewish female humanitarian, on stage, right after she received a reward at a Martin Luther King celebration and he told her, on stage, over the mike: “Now that Barack is our leader, we can come out with how we really feel about you, jews”…. and continued to rant how the Jews are to blame for all the black people’s problems in US today?!
Those who get the picture see where the bitterness and divisive attacks are really coming from. Obama is behind them and enables them 100%.
So, please Charles and George, give it a laugh and know what all sane bloggers have learned: The only way NOT to be maligned for attacking Obama is to simply worship him – and whatever you do, never question him.
Oh, and one more rule: We must all understand that we have no right or sense to consider THE INTEGRITY OF A CANDIDATE FOR LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD to be of any consequence or merit, as an issue.

Posted by: jmk | April 17, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

I have tryed all my 47 years not to HATE white people, but after last night it becomes more and more difficult.That was just terrible the way they won PA for Clinton–ROFLMAO!!!
And people don’t understand why minorities get so upset at this kind of stuff. It was an outright lynching last night. Yeah, I used the word lynching – get over it.
I don’t care who associates with whom and who’s got on lapel pin made in China on. There are more important issues going on out there.

Posted by: Larry | April 17, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

ABC has bigger boobs than Mae West. These two should heed Jon Steward’s advice to the Crossfire hosts: “Just stop it! The country needs you!”

Posted by: SG | April 17, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Isn’t it obvious that the media has been coddling Obama up until now? That he was finally challenged and collapses like a house of cards? The irrationality of Obama’s supporters is further proof of the radicalness of his followers, the disassociative personalities of his gullibles, the total lack of vetting that has been done. Are we all supposed to roll over and die because Obama is in our presence? The media has destroyed every candidate, yet Obama gets a few tough questions and he is crying like a baby. What an absolute disaster he would be in a crisis.

Posted by: KAMZ | April 17, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Great debate, finally the media asked Obama some hard questions. He didn’t hold up too well. Go Hillary!

Posted by: Jacko | April 17, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

‘Hopeful’—If your 13 year old daughter asked why they kept attacking Obama, you should tell her, they kept attacking Hillary for so many years and all the 15 months in the campaign, Obama should have received much more attack if they (the media) are fair. Hillary is a woman, and received so much attack, Obama is a man, he should not?? You should tell your girl, if she wants to be a female president, does she want to receive the unfair treatment from the media?

Posted by: golfgirlusa | April 17, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Wow, lots of comments on this issue and I am not surprised. ABC news has really lowered their standards and their level of professional ethics. Even today, ABC still can not accurately report their own lack of professionalism last night. How delusional. Just say it…… you made a bad call and did a bad job last night. ABC, may be a time to do a POLL ON YOURSELF!! believe me Americans want to respond after that tabloid style performance

Posted by: pleasedontwastemytime | April 17, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Obama supporters are unhappy because ABC
did not offer some pillows last night, so he was not comfortable enough to answer the questions.

Posted by: gc | April 17, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Obama when home last night and called Rev. Wright and siad you were right No, No, No, G*d Dam* America!
Michelle Obama then said I’m not proud of my country anymore… again.

Posted by: ha | April 17, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Your two interogators represent the worst of the old “gotcha” politics. Obama is right on the money with his dismissal of that phoney “debate”. Glad that’s the last time we have sit through that nonsense.
Grow up!

Posted by: Michael Munk | April 17, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

JMK – very well said.

Posted by: jaxhertz | April 17, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Last night’s debate is a example as to why I don’t watch ABC network. All the moderators did was attack both Obama and Clinton and forgot that what the American people and the voters in PA want to know is how either candidate is going to help bring America back from the hold we find ourselves in. George and Peter are nothing but a pair of puppets that were put into this so call “Debate” to take cheap shots at both candidates. Peter I once tought so highly of you but now I know you are nothing but a old nobody and George your below Peter. I don’t know how both of this moderators “journalists” still have a job?

Posted by: Rob | April 17, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

“Senator Barack Obama, D-Ill., both literally and figuratively, tried to brush off a rough performance after Wednesday night’s debate on ABC.”
I think ABC News is the one with the “rough performance.”

Posted by: Ang | April 17, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Your two interogators represent the worst of the old “gotcha” politics. Obama is right on the money with his dismissal of that phoney “debate”. Glad that’s the last time we have sit through that nonsense.
Grow up!

Posted by: Michael Munk | April 17, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

There was one key moment in the debate.
‘can Obama beat McCain?’
‘…Yes, yes, yes’
With that Hillary left the stage.

Posted by: markymark | April 17, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

The moderators did an outstanding job! Finally a debate where character issues are confronted and explored. The balance of issues and personal character questions was excellent. Bravo ABC!!

Posted by: Mike B. | April 17, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

pleasedontwastemytime – Waa. Waa. Waa.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Bravo ABC! There’s a kool-aid distribution center over at CNN and MSNBC if anyone is interested.

Posted by: Mack | April 17, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

I guess Obama finally figured out that affirmative action doesn’t mean he gets treated like a china doll by every media outlet. Was Charlie Gibson supposed to sigh when Obama talked? Was George Stephanopolus supposed to say he got tingles up his leg when Obama breathed? The left-wing print and news media has been dillusional about Obambi. He was treated as fairly as Hillary. You guys just aren’t used to Barack not getting preferential treatment. The corrupt media, being manipulated by David Axelrod a JOURNALIST who runs Obama’s campaign, is upset that a man of principal like Charlie Gibson actually demanded Obama explain himself. Obama looked ridiculous, and his “fans” can’t handle the truth.
HE IS AM EMPTY SUIT.

Posted by: Cornell1984 | April 17, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

1. George Stephanopoulos should never have been allowed to moderate that debate. He owes his entire career to the Clintons, and his bias was clear.
2. ABC has completely abdicated all journalistic integrity. There are plenty of real issues the moderators could have asked about. Instead they sank to the level of tabloid “journalists” who focus on minutiae instead of real topics that people might actually care about.
3. Asking Hillary Clinton about the stupid sniper fire thing was just as offensive as the questions asked of Obama; and I’m an Obama supporter. Yes, she lied; no, in the grand scheme of things, I don’t care about that.
4. EVERY American, regardless of political party, should be appalled by this. I can’t believe there are people out there who actually think that this travesty is somehow okay because Obama got more sleazy questions. How is that helpful? Do you really want McCain to get elected in November?
5. George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson are a disgrace to journalism, democracy ahd humanity.

Posted by: Aimee | April 17, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

It seems most of the people who had problems with ABC actually had problems with their candidate’s inability to explain his past ‘mis-speaks’. Most of the other news outlets give him a poor performance rating. He is now attacking ABC (as is his normal modus operandi) and is again explaining his earlier explanations.

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

From all the whining by the Barackula Hussein Obama lovers, it appears they have been stung.
What are you whining about?
1. “punished with a baby” statement?
2. Michelle Frankenbama not proud of her country even though it paid for her keep and education at Princeton and Harvard?
3. Barackula’s patronizing of bluecollar white men?
4. Rezko helping Barackula buy his house? How often do you get a friend to spend 1/2 a million to buy a lot next door so that you may buy your house? Fishy, very fishy.
5. Jeremiah Wright? Damn America?! Whites developed AIDS to eliminate blacks?!
6. All of the above?
Obama did nothing for blacks in Illinois! His claim that he abandoned a high-powered career in law is pure baloney. He left to make his millions in real estate–with taxpayer’s money–in collusion with Rezko the Syrian Crook. But, he was as bad a businessman as he was a legislator; the stolen money went to waste.

Posted by: Franken Michelle Bama | April 17, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Thank you Charles Gibson and George Stephanopolus for asking tough questions of BOTH candidates!
Well, Obama supporters, welcome to OUR world. Poor babies, their golden boy wasn’t handled with kid gloves like they’re so used to. He actually had to face up to some tough questions. And he didn’t fare too well either. Stumbling and lying about handwriting that was on a questionnaire but he insists wasn’t etc. Yes, they’re angry, because their candidate was finally challenged to answer with specifics and not generalities like “hope and unity” blah blah blah. Geez. If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen. Hillary has been facing this tough line of questioning for months — grow up!
As is typical of Barack Obama when faced with evidence to the contrary he lies. Right to the camera. This man cannot be trusted and his judgment is highly questionable. He is not any kind of “fresh” or “new” politician of hope and change. He’s just the same as all the other politicians who want to get elected. He never admits his mistakes or apologizes instead he obfuscates the issue with rhetoric or points to something else. Hillary Clinton at least has apologized over and over for a simple mistake in memory over some trivial thing like Bosnia. Also, re: Bosnia, there IS evidence, a video out there, that just prior to landing there had been sniper fire in the area and a general has supported Hillary’s account of this. But of course, it doesn’t make for sensational copy in the MSM to admit she was not lying about this incident. So she wasn’t running under a hail of sniper fire. Again, at least she apologized. He never does. And that’s the difference between a candidate who can admit a flaw and one who thinks he’s above his flaws.

Posted by: PDMM in L.A. | April 17, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Michael Munk – Well, back to MSNBC and CNN for you, huh? Charlie and George sure did a great job last night. Stop whining.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

I was extremely disappointed that the moderators for ABC took a play out of Karl Rove’s playbook to deter voters and candidates from the issues that mean something to voters! I tuned in to hear the candidates speak on the issues – War, Health Care, Economy, etc. Not to watch the reporters throw sand in the candidates faces. What a waste of a precious hour. One might assume from this debate that the media is part of the problem and in tight cahoots with Republicans. I’m changing the channel.

Posted by: Mari | April 17, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Last night’s debate was a political hit job by a former Clintonista (George Stephanopolous) and a Clinton donor (Charlie Gibson). It has to be the worst performance for any network in the history of televised debates. How emarrasing and sad for the country. How slimy indeed!

Posted by: Paul J | April 17, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Last night’s debate was a political hit job by a former Clintonista (George Stephanopolous) and a Clinton donor (Charlie Gibson). It has to be the worst performance for any network in the history of televised debates. How emarrasing and sad for the country. How slimy indeed!

Posted by: Paul J | April 17, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

I’m a PA voter and I suspect an upset on Tuesday. Obama by 5%. Check out the ABC vote on who won the debate. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/DemocraticDebate/popup?id=4668064
Obama 2008!!

Posted by: pt | April 17, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Obama continues his attacks unabated….It’s just when he’s unsripted that he runs into problems…like he has no answers.
So as his campaign continues its lie and smear campaign in the media his grassroots supporters spread their message of anger and threats.
I do not believe there are enough “bitter” people in America to elect this man President. I know for a fact he has lost the potential of my vote.
Look guys when the reality does not match the message…and when Obama continues to lie about all the relationships in his life…it gets a little creepy.
I like Obama’s policies more than McCains…because he got them from Clinton…but this guy is an obvious “divider”…
GW Bush ran as a uniter too, and as in this case that is just a campaign strategy!
Passive agressive anger is still anger and some of us see the disconnect,
Hillary or McCain will get my vote.

Posted by: Jackie | April 17, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Paul J – The republicans liked a Obama’s performance so much they say:
9:19 pm ET: A Republican strategist offers this, to ABC’s Karen Travers: “I think we’re going to buy 90 minute infomercials in October to replay this . . . I can’t believe Obama’s answer on Ayers. It’s like he never even considered the question. Doesn’t he do debate prep?! His answer was so bad/wrong/misleading/offensive – it’s going to be a huge problem for him . . .”

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

To: Larry — You sound as if you are not a newborn racist, but a well-seasoned one. To imply that you now “HATE” white people because of last night’s debate, would be like me saying I now “HATE” African Americans because Michael Vick was convicted of dogfighting. Don’t generalize, look beyond skin color. It is clear that you cannot.

Posted by: Mary Santos | April 17, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

what happen to the issue ,the questions you was asking really upset me.

Posted by: willie | April 17, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

what happen to the issue ,the questions you was asking really upset me.

Posted by: willie | April 17, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

I tuned in to hear a discussion of issues that might help me decide who would be the better Democratic candidate for President, and felt as if I had fallen into the front page of the National Enquirer. Who cares if Barack Obama worked with someone who behaved very badly when Obama was a child, but who now does good charity work? Who cares if Hilary Clinton told a whopper about her visit to Bosnia? What would they do as President and how would they deal with the great issues of our day? That’s what I want to know!
If ABC News thinks that what Stephanopoulos and Gibson did last night was good journalism, I’ll change my programming to record a different network news show, and will only check in with ABC when I want to know what the fad-driven and thoughtless are up to.

Posted by: headwards | April 17, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

So True
Obama supporters can’t handle the truth.
He got caught lying, and stuttered like a dufus. He finally didn’t get the red carpet treatment. He got treated like everyone else.
Is he bitter??
Is he clinging to his pillow?
Is he clinging to his false persona?
Is he clinging to his racist preacher?
Is he clinging to his unrepentant terrorist buddy?
Is he clinging to Hamas?
Cling, Obama, Cling.
I feel sorry for all his supporters. It is like turning 10 and finding out there is no Santa Claus. Oh, wait, maybe Obama supporters still don’t know that. I am so sorry. Did I ruin it for the ObamaNuts? 30, 40, 50 years old finding out there is not Santa and your candidate Obama is not such a great guy, that he has been lying, that his resume is thin, that he is a liar.

Posted by: LINY | April 17, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Obama comes off as the simpleton he is and now whines about moderators being unfair because they dared to call him out on his many lies. Shameful!

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Obama was so careful about his answers
in the debate that his responses to questions were long winded, and incoherent at times. It was obviously not a good night for him, and it shameful that his supporters want to
put the blame on ABC for his poor
performance.

Posted by: gc | April 17, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

So True
Obama supporters can’t handle the truth.
He got caught lying, and stuttered like a dufus. He finally didn’t get the red carpet treatment. He got treated like everyone else.
Is he bitter??
Is he clinging to his pillow?
Is he clinging to his false persona?
Is he clinging to his racist preacher?
Is he clinging to his unrepentant terrorist buddy?
Is he clinging to Hamas?
Cling, Obama, Cling.
I feel sorry for all his supporters. It is like turning 10 and finding out there is no Santa Claus. Oh, wait, maybe Obama supporters still don’t know that. I am so sorry. Did I ruin it for the ObamaNuts? 30, 40, 50 years old finding out there is not Santa and your candidate Obama is not such a great guy, that he has been lying, that his resume is thin, that he is a liar.

Posted by: LINY | April 17, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Obama was so careful about his answers
in the debate that his responses to questions were long winded, and incoherent at times. It was obviously not a good night for him, and it shameful that his supporters want to
put the blame on ABC for his poor
performance.

Posted by: gc | April 17, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

If Obama had an R after his name the questions would have been considered fair. Obama is a marxist and has revealed his true self through his own words (like those in San Fran),his actions (like being unwilling to wear a flag or say I love this country WITHOUT exception), his associations like rev Wrights and his serial anti- american rants (yes he’s a racist too , but first he is a leader of the blame America first crowd). Or Bill Ayers the UNREPENTANT terrorist who hosted an Obama for leg. event at his house ( not when he was 8) and Obama’s riduculous analogy to a sitting US senator is appalling, vacant, and adds to his marxist resume. Charlie Gibson and George Step. did the best job of ANY moderators on Democratic debates. It is more than obvious to any observer that the self admitted 89% liberal media is COMPLETELY in the Kool-aide TANK for Obama/

Posted by: mark | April 17, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

The below and probably above posts are pretty pathetic. It is amazing how all of our news has followed the Jerry Springer mentality. I have to admit when I watched the debate I enjoyed watching both of the candidates struggle with the questions.
But when the smoke cleared and the buzz whore off, I noticed the questions that the candidates had a tough time answering didn’t have anything to do with policies. ABC did a great job of distracting us from what was important. I can’t speak for everyone on here but as a fairly young (35) single African American man and a working professional these are scary times. I am in that top 6% of Americans making over six figures and let me tell you I sure don’t feel like I make more than 94% of the country. And with the way the economy is heading it continues to grow more and more difficult.
We need to ask more from our news outlets. Whether you are for Obama, Hilleary or McCain, we have some serious problems ahead of us and we should demand our news to ask them real questions on how they can fix these issues. Last night was grocery store checkout magazine trash. It was as though they had Brittney Spears and Lohan on the witness stand. And we all cheered with joy but in the end we were the ones getting screwed!
We all like to believe we are smart but last night we all lost a piece of our dignities and a real opportunity to learn more about the people who can possibly save our jobs, soldiers, future and that piece of the American Dream!
Shame on us all for cheering and supporting last nights day time talk show pretending to be a debate.

Posted by: Brian | April 17, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Hey Observer, quit that crap about Michelle Obama’s Thesis – she had a good reason for writng that. People who pretend that “racism” and “sexism” don’t exist are usally the ones guilty of it. If you read this and you continue to attack her, then we know exactly what you are.
This was written by Howrad Kurtz (who is not Obama friendly).
From The Washington Post:
“By the way, Michelle Obama took some heat for writing her Princeton thesis on the gulf between black and white, but it turns out her freshman roommate was horrified at being placed with an African American and her mother threatened to pull her from the school.”
Go to AJC.Com (By BRIAN FEAGANS Published on: 04/13/08) to read the full report – Georgian recalls rooming with Michelle Obama

Posted by: The Debster DC | April 17, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Do you promise not to raise taxes on the middle class voters making less than $250,000 a year?
What the hell was that all about? I make $50,000. The average income per household in America is about $48,000. That is a total combined income! Talk about self interest from the moderators.
Social Security? A tax? It is one of the few Government functions that actually delivers some benefit. They can raise my Social security tax, it at least it will not fall through the roof when the fear and greed crowd on wall street act.
Out of Touch? God Almighty ABC!

Posted by: Thinking | April 17, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

If Obama supporters think Ayers is just someone who is a neighbor of Obama and that he is not a part of the corrupt Chicago politics think again. Check out this link. http://www.commonvoice.com/article.asp?colid=8310

Posted by: jaxhertz | April 17, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Obama — not so smart when his puppet-masters aren’t pulling the strings. Now the world sees that he’s a total vacuum.

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Please look at Obama’s appearance on the view. Then compare it to McCain’s appearance on The View. McCain got grilled by pretend journalists, and Obama got complimented for an hour. Come on folks, this is America. Your candidate is not going to get preferential treatment by fair minded Americans. Most Americans have led a decent life and don’t have the liberal guilt of some of the posters here. Most of us don’t live in Upper East Side Condos or vacation on 454 ft yachts like the Huffington Post and MoveOn.org crowd. Our kids are in integrated school, have a diverse group of friends, and we don’t feel we owe anyone a vote.

Posted by: Karen | April 17, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Please look at Obama’s appearance on the view. Then compare it to McCain’s appearance on The View. McCain got grilled by pretend journalists, and Obama got complimented for an hour. Come on folks, this is America. Your candidate is not going to get preferential treatment by fair minded Americans. Most Americans have led a decent life and don’t have the liberal guilt of some of the posters here. Most of us don’t live in Upper East Side Condos or vacation on 454 ft yachts like the Huffington Post and MoveOn.org crowd. Our kids are in integrated school, have a diverse group of friends, and we don’t feel we owe anyone a vote.

Posted by: Karen | April 17, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

I got a sense of the preparedness of Clinton when they got into specifics of tax cuts and funding. You can not make someone accountable however for the remarks of others that they know. I think its a credit to Obama that he knows a wide ranging group of people and not just Washington insiders. We are in a win-win situation here, we just need not waver and run off to McCain should our chosen candidate not win.

Posted by: Ellen | April 17, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

BTW, George Stephanopolous left the Clinton administration in the first term under somewhat unfriendly conditions, he later wrote a book and was critical of Hillary Clinton. He is no mouthpiece for the Clintons. Now if it had been James Carville, then you’d have a case!
Man, just because Obama gets manhandled in one out of 19 debates you people go off the deep end. Unbelievable attitude you all have here! What a sense of entitlement! Hey, you think this was tough? Wait till the Republicans go to town on BO.

Posted by: PDMM in L.A. | April 17, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

There is a flaw in the notion Hillary Clinton’s background has been vetted more thoroughly than Barack Obama.
She has not been fully vetted In Public During Her PRESIDENTIAL Run.
As in – ‘we wrote about her, but it was years ago.’
What is known of her exists when she was first lady, or running for Senate. She is open to a different scrutiny now, as well as open, sunshine coverage of her past at this time. The press is not speaking about what she has done now – it’s simply referring all of us to google her and see if we find something.
I was surprised to hear she advised Bill to ‘screw ‘em’ about white southern males who did not support her. Yet we hear about Obama’s comments and deeds.
I see a list of Obama did this, Obama did that. Yet many of the others taking ABC to task are pointing the Clinton ommissions out. What’s wrong with ABC.
Ratings?
If that’s the case, when Obama gets in, we need to openly discuss how to challenge and remove the license for ABC to operate a broadcast outlet in the United States of America. Because the company’s motives do not serve the public.

Posted by: kravitz | April 17, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Obama did suck, he always says the same old tired answer when asked about something related to any negative, “same old washington politics” Thats his only defense? Yes because there is no defense for him even being where he is! people talk about Hillary acting like shes entitleed to the presidency! Well what about Obama, who does he think he is, A Senetor with 2 yrs experience, give me a break, if he can rrun for president, then anyone with money can! And to all the ones who talk about how much money the Clintons made in seven yrs. Check out how much he and his wife made in one year. They went from one million in 2006 to almost five million in 2007! And look at where Wright is buying his ten million mansion, predominantly White rich neighborhood. Yep they are oppressed alright1 and he Understands working class people, my foot!

Posted by: CHARLIESBABI | April 17, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Obama – the modern Simple Simon.

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Obama is going home to Chicago, or as the Reverend Wright would say
THE CHICKEN IS COMING HOME TO ROOST

Posted by: Auburn | April 17, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Thank goodness someone finally asked Obama some tough questions. Great job ABC.

Posted by: elan | April 17, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Dogsoldier,WCM,Geevil, Hillary’s supp at al,
Are you still there?
Did you see that how many of O’s supporters are complaining and ask ABC to fire Charlie and George.
They are making up some story, bribing etc, ridiculous.
We never aks Chris Matthew, Anderson and the gangs to get fired.
This remind me like American Idols “sanjaya” who voted off and all the teenagers cried so badly.
I believe now when last time people say they threatened super delegates. It seems the same now.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Obama did not look presidential
Obama looked lost up there
Obama answeres were long and confusing
Obama seemed tired and run down
It is time for people to realise that
Obama is not so good on the stage in a debate, as he good in a crowd of his
supporters with a mike in hand.

Posted by: gc | April 17, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Obama — an empty suit exposed! Now, let the whining begin as Obama goes quickly into his normal attack mode.
A uniter? Sure!

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

kravitz – Stop whining. You’re starting to sound much like Obama in last night’s debate, stupid.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Obama got embarrassed when he was finally asked a question about the economy, specifically the capital gains rate. With 100 million people owning stock, it effects so many people. Yet he was totally clueless. He stuttered, and whined, and came up with the idea that even if it increase revenue, it was unfair not raise taxes on capital gains to 28% or more. He is totally out of touch with reality. He said it depended on Wall Street and how business was going. What the heck is he talking about? What business, his book writing business? His wife’s no show job? Anyone with a degree from college should have cringed from his explanation. He did better defending his militant friends than talking about the economy.

Posted by: Karen | April 17, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Such arrogance, Obama! You really don’t care who you insult, do you?
That type of performance will NOT win you the presidency. GROW UP!
You will blow Democrat’s chance at the white house.

Posted by: feminist2thebone | April 17, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

It’s hard for the guy to hide his incompetence.

Posted by: Aston | April 17, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Come on- You are journalist??? No Way!!!
ABC has just lost a loyal viewer. Don’t tell me you are reporting only the facts. You slant the debate to your personal feelings. This is BAD for ABC. Bye

Posted by: Billy Joe | April 17, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

So much for a candidate that labeled himself “transparent, transformative and transcending”.
Obama is showing us that he’s just like any other politician. So what’s he got left to distinguish himself? Huh?
Oh yeah, I forgot: He’s Black!

Posted by: bromfield22 | April 17, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Billy Joe — another person who blames ABC for exposing his candidate’s incompetence.

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

The Debate yesterday:
It was an insult to the American people for ABC’s lack of focus on the real issues in the campaign rather than ad hominem personal attacks on Obama and to a lessor extent, Hilary. I used to watch ABC, but now I doubt if I will.

Posted by: Ricardo Teamor | April 17, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

The Debate yesterday:
It was an insult to the American people for ABC’s lack of focus on the real issues in the campaign rather than ad hominem personal attacks on Obama and to a lessor extent, Hilary. I used to watch ABC, but now I doubt if I will.

Posted by: Ricardo Teamor | April 17, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Boy, how the Obama fans rationalize their candidate’s lack of candor and honesty.

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Title should read: “ABC Tries to Brush off Absolutely Awful Debate Moderators by Blaming It All on Obama”

Posted by: flavour13 | April 17, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

abcdebate – Anyone who plays games on any gaming system including on computers know how to cheat on little things like internet polling. 10 year old stuff.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Obama is starting to scare me now that I see him without a tele-prompter. Scary…I fear Mccain and company cannot lose after what I saw last night.

Posted by: george | April 17, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Obambi seems so bitter, bitter, bitter.
He was so humiliated.

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Salute to ABC for coming forward so bravely .
Shame on CNN, MSNBC

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Obama blows it and Wally goes into the blame and attack mode.
Wow!

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

All of a sudden liberals are outraged at the format of a debate. John Edwards refused to appear at debates Fox had planned. I’m really not amazed that liberals don’t mind that conservatives have had to weather the questions from the liberal media for many years while their “ficticious” candidate got passes and even accolades. The great internet inventor, Al Gore even wished to make a pledge along with G.W. Bush back in the ’02 election. Gore said that he would not place any adds on TV if Bush agreed to do the same. Al Gore knew however, that his friends at ABC, CBS, and NBC would have his picture on every nightly newscast as well as interviewing Gore on Morning talk shows. The liberal press has a long history of feeding their babies enough free press. Now, liberals can realize what conservatives have had to deal with for years from the press. Truth and character do matter. It is my hope that this “fairy tale”, as Bill Clinton stated, will soon be over. We can then move on to real changes, not mystical bloviations from an unknown character.

Posted by: MDuecker | April 17, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I’m one of those who felt there was little difference between Clinton and Obama on policy. After watching this “debate” (as much as I could stomach), I am convinced that Obama stands head and shoulders above Hillary, both literally and figuratively. He could’ve gotten down in the dirt with her and George and Charlie and exposed her as the liar she is on the Bosnia trip but chose to act like a statesman and move on to actual issues!
By the way, Charlie–it’s time to go. You are more ridiculous every day. And as for George, I used to feel sorry for you when Condi treated you with such disrespect on Sundays–like a silly little boy. Now I know you are one!

Posted by: Nancy | April 17, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

If the questions were bad, the answers were worse. Shooting the messengers is a waste of good ammunition. The dem nominees deserve the entire clip for their moronic performance.

Posted by: Bob Strong | April 17, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

wally – Waa. Waa. Waa. The bad men frighten little girly man, Obama?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Poorest excuse for a debate that I’ve ever viewed. Had a lot more in common with a gossip columm that a new program. The moderators should start working on their resumes.

Posted by: Rich | April 17, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

It was only a matter of time before the idiots would again state that any criticism of Obama is racism. Shameful. So we will have such a repressive government under a LORD OBAMA that as citizens we are forbidden from criticizing him or be arrested for a hate crime?
The utter nonsense of Obama supporters. Hide behind his lack of depth, and throw up a smoke screen. Distract and distort. When you make Hillary Clinton look honest, you know you are a bad.
Obama’s supporters realize the only chance he has is be the perpetual victim. What a great concept — a president who cries victim every time he gets scrutiny.
Stand up for your rights, America. They are already taking away your chance to dissent against powerful political figures like Obama. They want to stifle your opposition to a liberal media favorite being annointed president.
Do not be oppressed by the Obama political machine.

Posted by: uscitizen | April 17, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Obama is such a priss. FACT: he couldn’t handle Hillary — and she was restrained.
Besides. That creepy Twilight Zone voice of his was grating.

Posted by: ANorth | April 17, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

45 minutes to get to issues that matter. Did any of the moderators see that oil inventories dropped yesterday for no good reason. There is absolutely no reason for this drop since demand is flat. Why didn’t these newsmen address that. Why aren’t the candidates addressing the horrible economy. Obama tries, but Hillary and Bill won’t let him raise the important issues.

Posted by: Diane Ghil | April 17, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

I agree Obama’s performance was weak – as weak as I’ve ever seen. Maybe he was thrown off guard because he rightly expected that last night’s event would be some semblance of a “debate.” And that there would be some reasonable amount of discussion of issues that mean something to him and to voters. On both counts what he saw instead was an appalling lack of professionalism and respect–for both candidates, for the voters, and for the democratic process.
The exchanges on this message board are no better. The lack of respect, the lack of clarity around the issues, and in many cases the lack of even the most basic grasp of the English language – I just pray that this cesspool is not a true representation of the quality of the thinking that is going to guide voters in November.

Posted by: Soleil | April 17, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

My mom always told me “you’re known by the company you keep.”
Obama supporters show themselves to be bullies, hostile and aggressive. What does that say about their leader?

Posted by: bromfield22 | April 17, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Rich – You’re sounding like Obama in last night’s debate, dumb.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Obama is even lucky they did not question him about Larry Sinclair and his alleged crack use and homo sex. Obama would have cried.waahhh..Michelle, Jerry Wright come help me. Sooner or later someone is going to have to ask those questions. The Sinclair issue might not even be true but they should leave that judgment to the American people. BTW: Thank you ABC for asking him those questions that most Americans wants answers on. Hillary rocked last night!!!!

Posted by: jaxhertz | April 17, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

I’m glad Michelle Obama wrote that. Black people should help each other like other groups do. That’s what’s best for America.
Thanks for posting. Michelle had her head in the right place even as a college kid.

Posted by: Another Observer | April 17, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Mr. Obama, in spite of the trivial flack, you came across as a true statesman to me. You have my vote!!!

Posted by: Richard L. McCluskey | April 17, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Diane Ghil – I work for big oil and I know the energy sector. However, I am a Hillary supporter. Nevertheless, if you want to discuss energy I’m willing to engage you.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Look at all the Obamabots. Listen up ABC, this election coverage has been largely slanted FOR Obama.. thank you, for taking off the kid gloves and asking the guy some tough questions. After all, this is for the president.. it is not a beauty or popularity contest.. it’s serious. Thank you, for finally stepping up and doing what CNN and MSNBC have failed to do. Honestly asking some questions of the Saint Obama.

Posted by: A reader in Georgia | April 17, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Observer – I’m with you. Give Charlie and George a raise. They deserve a huge bonus, today!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Absolutely disgusting!! I knew that
there was a reason that I never watch
an ABC news show and now I know why. If
Charlie and George are the best that
ABC has to offer no thank you. These
are supposed to be bright, intelligent
journalists asking bright, intelligent
questions. Instead they looked like
idiots asking idiotic questions.

Posted by: sharon | April 17, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Absolutely disgusting!! I knew that
there was a reason that I never watch
an ABC news show and now I know why. If
Charlie and George are the best that
ABC has to offer no thank you. These
are supposed to be bright, intelligent
journalists asking bright, intelligent
questions. Instead they looked like
idiots asking idiotic questions.

Posted by: sharon | April 17, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Obama did not, as the tag line in your On the Radar windows suggests, “attempt” to brush off that debate. He DID brush it off. What nonsense. The guy is 100% right. The journalists, and especially George Stephanopoulos, who by the way is a Clinton kiss-up from way back, were a total waste of my time. I wanted to hear substantive issues and what I got were things rehashed for an hour.

Posted by: Bob Long | April 17, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Bob Long – Little girly man, Obama, have a rough debate? Oohh, did the bad men ask girly boy hard questions?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Anyone that saw the debate knows that Obama was totally out of his league.
There is no way he wond anything.
Now just imagine this same guy making decisions about your safety. Imagine him as “commander-in-cheif” Imagine he and Rezko turning the country into a politically corrupt playground for real estate deals. Imagine him and Wright spreading their message of hate.
This is the guy that Hamas, Rezko, Farrakan, the Black Panthers, and Ayers the “loose on a technicality bomber” have all raised money for, endorsed, supported and spiritually mentored.
If you want to know who someone is….let him introduce you to his friends…If they lie about who their friends are and even if their handwriting is on something…you need to wonder.
IF YOU ARE ON HERE AS AN ATTACK DOG FROM THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN…shame on you…you can’t convince people that you are bringing hope when you are spreading hate.

Posted by: Jackie | April 17, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

“You think it’s racist for blacks to help other blacks out exclusivly? If you do, you could be a Nation of Islam follower? How’s that blue eyed devil thing working out over there at H.Q.?”
She didn’t say helping only blacks exclusively, idiot. There are Jews who go only to Jewish doctors, for example. I’m sure that doesn’t mean they care only about Jews. They simply wish to strengthen the Jewish community. Now, which group needs more strengthening than the black community? If blacks behaved more like Jews and other minorities in that regard the entire country would be better off.

Posted by: Another Observer | April 17, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

ABC you just lost a viewer…and I hope you lose more. You have demostrated taht your journalists are incompetent and biased. As a voter who came home early to watch the debate in hopes of getting a better idea of where each candidate stands of important issues, the debate last night was a complete waste of my time.

Posted by: Tanya | April 17, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Obama should have entered his meetings today playing Jay-Z’s song “Get That Dirt Off Your Shoulder”. Seeing him brush off his shoulders and then have ABC saying he brushed off last night debate made me laugh because Obama is too intelligent for you guys that don’t like him and you can’t handle it! Obama will be the next Democratic Nominee and President of USA!

Posted by: Wow | April 17, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Tanya — another bitter Obama fan who needs to blame ABC for her candidate’s miserable showing. Pathetic!

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

WAY TO GO ABC!you will be my 1st choice for news,after fox.obama would be good at dodge ball too.wake up people! do you want a president that hates white people.look at his pastor/adviser for 20 years.keep up the good work ABC.

Posted by: some where in sc | April 17, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

People here dont seem to get. There was a sharp difference. Someone of pricesaly 3 somesones coming to the debate with the old politic of blames and nothing to really offer to the american people. And someone with a new vision that attempt to move on beyond the blames and fights and really talk to the public and refused to be draw into the sillyness.

Posted by: leche | April 17, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

What a cry baby he can’t take the heat four to one there to see her. He isn’t doing to well the polls are not right.
the fat lady was seen warming up in the hills of PA.You know us low information voters you can’t trust us.

Posted by: Bishop | April 17, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Typical Obama. State that he is “above” dirty politics during the debate last night and then take the hatchet (or in his words, “twist the knife”) to into Clinton and ABC the next day on the stump. What a fraud! Can you believe that this man might get elected? Only in America!!

Posted by: colorado | April 17, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

The debate last night was a complete waste of time. I anticipated some bias from George because he used to work for the Clintons, but I said to myself he is a professional who deserves the benefit of the doubt. I now see that he is still working for them, except now he works under the table.
Charlie, on the other hand, is a complete shocker.
I miss Peter Jennings!
What is happening to ABC’s dignity?
That was not journalism last night!
That was Charlie helping his collegue Geoge do his clandestine work for the Clinton party.
ABC’s platform has been misused!
Shame on you both!

Posted by: Marie | April 17, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Obozo blows it and his supporters whine and cry and blame everyone for their dunderhead candidate’s impotent performance. Get the man some Viagra!

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Many Obama posters todays are sounding scarily like Jim Jones followers when those Congressman started asking questions about their cult. Really.

Posted by: geevill | April 17, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Obama might be brushing off your tough debate — I’m not stopping there. I’m brushing off your whole network.’
YOU SUCK! You are an embarassment.

Posted by: Julie | April 17, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

This was the worse attempt at conducting a debate that I have ever witnessed. It was one sided and totally disgusting. The real issues of the American people were completely overshadowed by this “Trash Obama” campaign, not only by the moderators, but by Hillary Rodham Clinton. I am not surprised at ABC, they were trying to raise their ratings, but Sen. Clinton I think that you were just despicable, you even had your henchman there, helping you bash Sen. Obama. I am also convinced that you had advance notice of what the questions would be, that’s why your answers were so glib. God please save the United States of America (and the rest of the world)from this woman!
ABC, how does it feel to have your ratings raised at the expense of your reputation, and good journalism?. I hope you enjoy your success!

Posted by: Ilona | April 17, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Who is ABC trying to fool with this absurd response to their incompetent and insulting debate? The citizens of the United States are taking the real issues faced by this country VERY seriously; the corporations that have dismantled our media apparently can’t muster the intellectual curiosity. Oh – I’m sorry – it that too “elitist” for you? We’re concerned about the Iraq War, illegal torture carried out by a renegade president, elimination of our civil rights, illegal spying, an economy poisoned by deregulation, job outsourcing by multinational corporations; ABC and Disney – multinational corporations – would prefer that we focus on lapel pins and bitterness and sound bytes and other nonsense. This was perhaps the most important debate of the campaign season and ABC could muster nothing better than the vacuous stupidity of Fox News.

Posted by: SoCal Burner | April 17, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Dogsoldier,
you are right.
Internet polling is not accurate.
Even kids can do that.
I guess ABC rate is not down but even higher because people would like to know the truth.
Finally ABC the first network did it.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

I am very sickened by the voters acceptance of OBAMA’s brush-offs. He has yet to explain how he has dinner and parties with known terrorists. How many bloggers here, have dinner with terrorists?????????????????????????
This is not a political attack, this is a FACT.

Posted by: mj | April 17, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

NEW YORK – ABC News drew both record ratings and a heap of complaints about how Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos moderated the Democratic presidential debate, criticism that Stephanopoulos on Thursday called a sign of how much people care.
By midafternoon Thursday, more than 15,600 comments were posted on ABC News’ Web site, the tone overwhelmingly negative. A prominent TV critic, Tom Shales of The Washington Post, said Gibson and Stephanopoulos “turned in shoddy, despicable performances.”

Posted by: Thinking | April 17, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

“Obama supporters are acting like sissys,”I hate ABC”, “ABC better apologize”..come on people. Your candidate was asked some tough questions, things the American people have been talking about, and you all freak out. Pathetic. Mccain is gonna smoke this chump. Almost feel bad for you pinkos.
Posted by: jon | Apr 17, 2008 6:12:45 PM”
Jon – it is not the questions that bother me – Obama answered every one of those “tough” questions well. It is the integrity of the debate, as set up by ABC, that bothers me. And, for the record, if they had chosen a moderator with longstanding ties to Obama, I would be saying the same thing, even though I am not a Clinton Supporter.

Posted by: Christian | April 17, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Observer,
You are right.
Where these Obama bloggers come from? Suddently they just act like we are having a big riot now.
I wonder if his idol lost what they are going to do?
Scary huh!
ABC please just ignore these comments. You did a great jobs.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

What planet are Hillaryites from when they claim Obsma whined about this debate. Don’t you remeber her whining during a previous debate that she was always asked the first tough question? Don’t you remember her going on SNL to whine that the press was pro-Obama? Where have you been? Hillary is the biggest whiner in America.

Posted by: Dennis | April 17, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

“Struck a nerve, huh? You know that Jewish problem you have is a requirement for membership in the NOI right?
Careful, your true colors are starting to show thru. Who’s the IDIOT? You can’t even come up with an original user name, just something a 13 year old would do, putting a spin on mine and trying to be cute.
Are you one of the NOI members, sister?”
_________________________
I think you’re the one with the struck nerve, idiot. People usually ignore idiot racist trolls like you but I thought I’d call you on your b.s.
Jews help each other. Italians help each other. Koreans help each other. Vietnamese help each other, etc. You can even say that the majority WASPs help each other. African Americans do not help each other in the same way. They do not circulate the billions of dollars the black community generates within the black community. This is not good for the black community and not good for the country as a whole. Michelle, as a college kid, understood this but you’re either too dumb or racist to figure it out.
What’s your point? And I don’t mean your pointy head.

Posted by: Another Observer | April 17, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Thanks The Debster DC for the info on Michelle Obama.
Observer will never read it – he is a RACIST – He probably wears a white sheet.

Posted by: Anti-Media | April 17, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

I think the biggest losers last night were ABC, George and Charlie- and the American audience. Nobody wins when we can’t hear the candidates debate issues people care about rather than rumors, pettiness and lies. If we don’t speak up now and demand higher professional standards from the media and our candidates, then we’ll get more of the same until the election.

Posted by: wakeupabc | April 17, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

George Stephanopulous is no fan of the Clintons.

Posted by: Anti-Media | April 17, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

MEN ARE TO BLAME FOR 9/11. THINK ABOUT IT. MEN BUILT THE TOWERS. MEN IN THE WHITE HOUSE. BIN LADEN IS A MAN. MEN HIJACKED THE PLANES.
(men are evil)
HILLARY ’08!

Posted by: Matt | April 17, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Georgian recalls rooming with Michelle Obama
By BRIAN FEAGANS
Published on: 04/13/08
Catherine Donnelly shopped at Kmart, settled into her dorm room and soaked up the Gothic stone buildings where, over the next four years, she would grow into her own woman.
But her first day at Princeton held a surprise, too. And Donnelly knew it would mean confronting the past.
Family photo
(ENLARGE)
This picture was taken in 1985 at Catherine Donnelly’s graduation from Princeton. With her are her mother, Alice Brown (left) and grandmother, Martha Thompson.
JIM R. BOUNDS /Associated Press
(ENLARGE)
Michelle Obama speaks last week at Winston-Salem State University. When Catherine Donnelly saw her on TV news reports, she thought she looked familiar.
Rich Addicks/Staff
(ENLARGE)
Catherine Donnelly(right), with her mother, Alice Brown, in Donnelly’s home outside Palmetto.
ELECTION 2008
The Road to the White House
• Guide to 2008 election
• Interactive: Record primary turnout by state
• Where Georgia superdelegates stand on Obama, Clinton
• Latest delegate count
• Map: The national race
• Interactive: Pick veep
• Latest polls: PA | NC
• Issues: Dems | GOP
Latest Headlines:
* Poll shows McCain winning back unhappy Republicans
* Clinton says Obama can win the presidency
* Obamas report income of $4.2 million in 2007 tax returns
* Bruce Springsteen endorses Obama
* Rep. Murtha says McCain is too old to be president
* Obama, Clinton face off in what could be their last debate
* Two Ga. congressmen, wives at odds over presidential picks
• More political news
Next up
• April 22: PA
• May 3: Guam (Dems only)
• May 6: NC, IN
She walked into the historic Nassau Inn that evening and delivered the news to her mother, Alice Brown. “I was horrified,” recalled Brown, who had driven her daughter up from New Orleans. Brown stormed down to the campus housing office and demanded Donnelly be moved to another room.
The reason: One of her roommates was black.
“I told them we weren’t used to living with black people — Catherine is from the South,” Brown said. “They probably thought I was crazy.”
Today both Donnelly, an Atlanta attorney, and Brown, a retired schoolteacher living in the North Carolina mountains, look back at that time with regret. Like many Americans, they’ve built new perceptions of race on top of a foundation cracked by prejudices past — and present. Yet they rarely speak of the subject.
Barack Obama’s run for president changed that. When the Democratic senator from Illinois invited more dialogue on race last month, Donnelly and Brown, both lifetime Republicans, were ready.
But their willingness to talk isn’t a response to the candidate born to a white woman from Kansas and a black man from Kenya. It’s more about Obama’s wife, Michelle.
She’s that roommate from a quarter century ago.
Shock to the stereotype
The acceptance letter from the Ivy Leagues was really the culmination of two peoples’ hard work. “My mother was thrilled,” Donnelly jokes, that she got into Princeton.
Divorced and living paycheck to paycheck, Brown found a way to get her only child into New Orleans’ elite Isidore Newman School: She taught 8th-grade science there. They were a mother-and-daughter team, then with the surname Rodrigue.
Donnelly, now 44, captained the basketball and volleyball teams. She was the homecoming queen. And she racked up science and math awards, often with the help of her mother.
But the “Three R’s” weren’t the only thing Donnelly learned from an early age. There was a fourth one. Her mother and grandmother filled her head with racist stereotypes, portraying African-Americans as prone to crime, uneducated and, at times, people to be feared.
Brown, 71, explains that she was raised to think that way. She recalls hearing her grandfather, a sheriff in the North Carolina mountains, brag about running black visitors out of the county before nightfall. And Brown’s parents held on to the n-word like a family heirloom.
In fact, upon learning that her daughter had a black roommate at Princeton, Brown’s first call was to her own mother. Her suggestion: yank Donnelly out of school.
Girl was likable, but black
The fourth-floor room had three beds, three desks and space for little else. The ceiling sloped in concert with the roof, creating a cramped perch atop the upper crust of American education.
Quick-witted and nearly 6 feet tall, Michelle Robinson had no problem filling the room, Donnelly recalls. The future Michelle Obama, from Chicago’s Southside, would playfully tease the third roommate, who was white. Obama’s long fingers still narrate stories in Donnelly’s mind. “From the minute we met,” she says, “I liked her.”
Donnelly doesn’t think Obama ever picked up on her mother’s behind-the-scenes maneuvering. She remembers nothing but friendly words. Only now, looking back, does she see the wall between them.
Donnelly was surprised to find something familiar – segregation – alive and well on a prestigious campus in the Northeast. The university’s private eating clubs, host to frat-style parties, were largely white. The social scene for many minority students, including Obama, revolved around an activity building called the Third World Center.
When Obama began hanging out with other black students on campus, Donnelly never thought to join them. “Here was a really smart black woman who I found charming, interesting and funny,” Donnelly says with disappointment. “Just by virtue of having different color skin, we weren’t going to be friends.”
Other than confirming that Donnelly was her freshman roommate, Michelle Obama declined, through a campaign spokeswoman, to comment for this story. Her senior thesis, however, delved into the experience of black alumni at Princeton and provides some insight into her mind-set at the time.
In the introduction, Obama wrote that Princeton made her more aware of her “Blackness” than ever before. “No matter how liberal and open-minded some of my White professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don’t belong,” she wrote. “Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with Whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be Black first and a student second.”
Donnelly, meanwhile, was struggling with her own identity. She came out that first semester, chopped off her hair and partied with other lesbians on campus. Soon she, too, learned what it feels like to be part of the “other” group, to be seen as a student second.
Donnelly said she and Obama had established separate circles of friends by second semester. That’s when another room – the one her mother had requested – opened up. By then, it just made sense to trade cramped quarters for roomier ones.
Donnelly doesn’t remember having another meaningful exchange with Obama. She graduated with a psychology major in 1985 and forgot all about that tall roommate from Chicago.
‘I was inspired …. I was envious’
More than two decades passed, and Donnelly, who normally doesn’t care much for politics, found herself intrigued by one of the Democrats running for president. She was a little surprised to hear her mother liked Barack Obama, too. Brown had never voted for a Democrat. But she’s a sucker for Harvard grads, especially eloquent ones.
“He thinks well,” Brown said recently, though she and Donnelly are still undecided voters. “He seems to be a thoughtful person. He considers everything.”
When Donnelly first saw Obama’s wife on TV, she was struck by how tall and graceful she looked. Then she studied her more closely. Michelle Obama looked so familiar, down to those long fingers. Could that be Michelle Robinson?
A Google search gave Donnelly the answer. Obama was far more than a first-lady hopeful. She had gone to Harvard Law School, had been an associate dean at the University of Chicago and rose to vice president at the University of Chicago Hospitals. Like Donnelly, she was mother to two children.
“I was inspired,” she says. “I was amazed. And I was envious of all she had accomplished.”
Donnelly called her mother, who in turn phoned the friend who had traveled with her to Princeton all those years ago. The friends had stayed up that night calling everyone they knew with a connection to the university, hoping to get Catherine moved. “We thought this is so ironic,” Brown says. “[Obama] could be the first lady, and here we wanted to get my child out of her influence.”
Some empathy for lingering anger
As her 2- and 5-year-old boys play on the front porch, Donnelly flips through a photo album of her own childhood. Brown, in Atlanta for her monthly hair appointment, looks over her daughter’s shoulder.
“There we are,” Brown says, “at your graduation.”
In the photo, Donnelly clutches a bouquet in front of her white dress, smiling next to her mother and her grandmother.
The story of race in America is one of generations: what’s passed on, what isn’t and the friction between the two.
When Brown heard about Barack Obama’s former pastor — his angry rants against white America — she didn’t like it. But she understood. “If I had been treated the same way blacks have been treated,” she says, “I’d be resentful, too.”
It was Donnelly, however, who understood Obama’s response: “The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static.”
Society changed, and Donnelly has seen her mother nudged along with it. Says Brown: “It’s become politically incorrect to talk about black people in a negative way. It’s like smoking.”
Brown quit smoking in 1996. She’s still working on the other.
Brown says she wouldn’t mind if her child or grandchild roomed with a black person today. But she’s far from colorblind. “Where I draw the line is interracial marriage,” Brown says. “That I can’t quite deal with.”
She holds firm to the belief that African-Americans don’t take enough responsibility. “Bill Cosby says the same thing,” she says. “Get off your rear end and work hard and improve yourself.”
Donnelly has more empathy. Her junior year psychology paper on affirmative action concluded that the effects of “covert, deep-rooted prejudice” are enduring. And she generally agrees with what Barack Obama said last month: “The disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to the inequities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of Jim Crow.”
Living as a gay woman has made Donnelly far more aware of what it’s like to be judged by a trait beyond your control. “Being gay is such a small part of who I am.”
Now she wishes she had reached across racial lines at Princeton. “I don’t think I ever set foot in the Third World Center,” she says of the popular hangout for minority students. “It’s like this mystical place.”
Since then, Donnelly has worked and socialized with African-Americans. Yet she hasn’t grown close to any of them. “I’ve just never had an opportunity,” she says, “to have a good friend who was black.”
“You did with Michelle,” Brown snaps.
Donnelly rolls her eyes.
She believes the cycle of racism can be stopped.
Donnelly turns the pages in the photo album to a picture of an African-American boy standing next to her at school back in New Orleans. “He and a white guy and I would fashion ourselves after the Mod Squad,” she says. “We liked to think of ourselves as a little club.”
The friendship started in fifth or sixth grade. And Donnelly sees it as evidence that children have the right instincts.
Truth is, many paths to the future start with the past. Donnelly thought she’d left that Princeton dorm room for good. Then those long fingers from the campaign trail waved her back inside. At first, she saw only herself and two roommates.
Now she sees her children and Obama’s children waking up in those beds, in a room with no barriers.
More on ajc.com

Posted by: Anti-Media | April 17, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Love how these Hillary supporters are trying to hold on to their last breath. You guys still aren’t going to win because of that debate.
Superdelegates are smarter than you and know that despite it all, Obama remained the voice of hope and positivity in that debate and they saw that. In fact, today 2 more superdelegates went the Obama way.
Don’t you guys pay attention? Hillary’s negativity is turning off many superdelegates. She’s going to alienate them all if she keeps it up.
And why oh why do you guys keep ignoring that Hillary is the only candidate with more unfavorable perceptions than favorable ones and that more than 50% of people consider her untrustworthy. That is something supers also pay attention to…they know that Hillary is not all that. She has created a myth of experience and strength.
By the way, on the strength issue, who’s the one that teared up after Iowa, or went in a fit of rage in Ohio when she accused Obama of using Karl Rove tactics (bull of course, she did flip-flop on NAFTA). Who’s the one that whined about the media being too tough on her and having a double standard. Who said she was tired after she got caught fabricating her Bosnia story…the list goes on and on…
At this point your opinion doesn’t matter anyway, but supers are definitely flocking to Obama…and they know both candidates better than you all do.

Posted by: Anthony | April 17, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Dogsoldier,
Yes, you know they will try everything.
That’s what happen to American Idols , they never get tired to vote.
I never believe the polls on internet.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Dogsoldier,
Michelle is not running for president. Secondly, she did not write about hating anyone. You’re a liar. Google Michelle’s roommate in Princeton. Very illuminating for anyone with an open mind who wants to know where Michelle is coming from. And stop twisting words. Michelle said it was the first time she was REALLY proud of her country. That means that she has been proud before doesn’t it?
Wonder what would have happened if it had been Michelle who in reference to working class whites said “screw ‘em.?” That was Hillary. Had it been Michelle the racist trolls would have pounced. Hell, they pounce without any justification.

Posted by: Another Observer | April 17, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Obozo — the world’s funniest clown!

Posted by: S | April 17, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Way to go ABC!!! Fair and Balanced!!! These were no rumors!!! Who is Senator Obama???

Posted by: Ell | April 17, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Obamas tax return 2007 showed they only donated money to Black community.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Charles Gibson is a great news anchor and its nice that we are finally hearing some different questions. The canadidates have been rehashing their views (if you want to call it that)for over a year now. Hillary and Obama have been asked their views many,many times all they do is contradict themselves and even tell outright lies, we know this and it has been proven. I prefer a debate that will actually get at the personality of the canadidates. Anybody can say they are for or against something. I want to know how they think I am not voting for a yes or no man/woman.I am voting for a person who I want to trust to run our country. The “trival” issues raised in the debate are in fact relevant because they provide further insight into the individual. I think ABC did well and other journalists should not be quick to condenm the debate until they analyze their own election performance.

Posted by: Len | April 17, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

A debate being moderated by one of your former staffers, with questions from–of all people Sean Hannity–how can that so-called debate even be considered fair and objective?
The comments from the Abc News website say it all.
That right . . . brush em off Barack!
Obama 08

Posted by: Cassandra | April 17, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

I was totally appalled at the performance of Gibson and George S. Tough questions should be asked, but after a while they just seemed like sanctimonious bullies. You seem to be more driven by ratings than responsible journalism. I am truly thinking of boycotting ABC period.

Posted by: Can we all get along | April 17, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Obama repeatedly answered questions put before him by Bill Clinton’s cronies without hesitation; this is not so of Hillary who played off of Obama’s comments. Hillary refused direct answers regardless of the countless prompting from the news panel. As far Obama’s association with Rev. Wright, Hillary still frequents her catholic, the pedophiles that sodomize children and ruin their lives forever. How much money did Rev. Wright pay for his comments, not a thing cent, however how much has the Catholic Church paid…you’ve got it, millions of dollars. The bottom line is this, Obama does not share Rev. Wright’s views, and however Hillary is a Catholic and does share views of the Catholic faith, which consequently reflect the reason for her conscious less lies which she will take into the White House. So the debate went well and clearly showed the country that Hillary remains a manipulative uncontrollable lier. Obama has not be found to be so, thus is the better candidate for president of the US. He knows what he needs too to keep this country strong.

Posted by: GreenTea | April 17, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Obama repeatedly answered questions put before him by Bill Clinton’s cronies without hesitation; this is not so of Hillary who played off of Obama’s comments. Hillary refused direct answers regardless of the countless prompting from the news panel. As far Obama’s association with Rev. Wright, Hillary still frequents her catholic, the pedophiles that sodomize children and ruin their lives forever. How much money did Rev. Wright pay for his comments, not a thing cent, however how much has the Catholic Church paid…you’ve got it, millions of dollars. The bottom line is this, Obama does not share Rev. Wright’s views, and however Hillary is a Catholic and does share views of the Catholic faith, which consequently reflect the reason for her conscious less lies which she will take into the White House. So the debate went well and clearly showed the country that Hillary remains a manipulative uncontrollable lier. Obama has not be found to be so, thus is the better candidate for president of the US. He knows what he needs too to keep this country strong.

Posted by: GreenTea | April 17, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Another Observer – Michelle isn’t running for President? Nor is Bill Clinton. Who knew? You’re very loose with the racists dribble.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

We knew George was a Clinton insiders. But how much does the Clinton campaign pay Gibson for this hack job?

Posted by: beatenberg | April 17, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

The name of this debate should have been called, Hillary’s saviors heroically displayed bias for the little lady. When the commentators spend half of the time “Getting Obama”, they should have been asking the kind little lady about her alleged missteps. Please don’t tell me she has been vetted, we all known about sniper fire. Gibson clumsily tried to appeared like he had great nobility type of self esteem. However, he did displayed sophisticate bias skills and it was extraordinarily smooth. Stephanolous is a joke.

Posted by: suv2001 | April 17, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Dogsoldier,
Hillary says she was co-president. Therefore what the impeached, disbarred, disgraced Bill does or says is relevent.
What would you jokers say had it been Michelle who said “screw ‘em” in reference to working class whites. Racists indeed. You racist trolls are a bunch of clowns. Most of you haven’t kissed a girl in ages–if ever.

Posted by: Another Observer | April 17, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

ABC News is a complete J-O-K-E! You all have completely lost every ounce of my respect! Why waste 45 minutes of debate time on garbage that does not help to improve our state of affairs in this country??? What are you, partners with the National Inquirer, now??!!It’s also unbelievably UNPROFESSIONAL and a disservice to the American people to allow a former Clinton staffer to “moderate” this debate!!!What an enormous conflict of interest that you chose to ignore…well let us now see how many Americans choose to ignore your news broadcasts from now on!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Rebecca | April 17, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Bill Clinton: “All these insecure white people.”
Hillary Clinton: “Screw ‘em” in reference to those same white people.
Not a peep from the racist trolls.

Posted by: Another Observer | April 17, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Yes we can, we can have hope, if we have hope we can make change, hope to make change, yes we can.
OMG, there is no substance to that man. I think I will vote McCain. Just don’t tell my family :-)

Posted by: Fla Dem | April 17, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Hurray ABC, for asking questions of Obama that everyone should want to know the answers to. I do believe he is a pied piper. Why would we not want to know if he is anti-American? It seems that the people who believe in him, do so blindly and do not want to hear anything negative. Better to find out now than later, after he is President. I’m not a Hillary supporter either, but I’ve come to respect her more than Obama.

Posted by: Jean | April 17, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Gibson and Stephanopoulos both of you should be shamed of yourself. I use to like watching “Meet the Press.” Not now! Charles Gibson, I didn’t watch you on Good Morning America and I surely won’t watch you now.
George, you gave Hilary the questions a head of time. Shawn Hanity is a sleeze bag. They should have asked her about Vince Foster and Whitewater. This debate was a trip. Hilary is nothing but a liar. Both of you are tack heads.

Posted by: Mad as Hell | April 17, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Dogsoldier:
You’re problem is that the qoute has been confirmed and verified by at least 3 sources. Sources, I might add, infinitely more credible and truthful than Hillary Clinton, who is universally regarded as a habitual and consistant liar. Remember, she was dodging bullets in Bosnia.

Posted by: Another Observer | April 17, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Observer:
What you jokers don’t get is that most people who read that won’t give a crap. For one thing, there is such a thing as context.
So stay in mother’s basement as surf porn sites or whatever it is you morons do.

Posted by: Another Observer | April 17, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

All this is hilarious!!
Let me sum all of this up:
“Ladies and gentleman, the next president of the United States,
John McCain.”

Posted by: Dave | April 17, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

All this is hilarious!!
Let me sum all of this up:
“Ladies and gentleman, the next president of the United States,
John McCain.”

Posted by: Dave | April 17, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

ABC: shame, shame, shame. Worst-class journalism. Let’s not even bother calling it journalism. Trash.

Posted by: Li Wong | April 17, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

The problem is that Gibson and Stephanopoulos are too stupid to understand the criticism of the debate.
I think the only solution is that the media should never host these thing – it should be NOW or someone like that.

Posted by: Dave | April 17, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Stop complaining because your leader was shown that under pressure he can’t handle it.
If he thought this was tough, wait until McCain gets a hold of him. This debate was the ONLY non-biased one we’ve had.
Kudos to ABC to have the guts to say ENOUGH with biased debates.

Posted by: sheanne | April 17, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

For the Love of the Democratic Party – let us, Obama and Clinton Supporters, STOP this back and forth and join up to beat John McCain and the MEDIA.

Posted by: Anti-Media | April 17, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

“Oops I did just like Hilary I made a mistake! I meant “This Week with George Stephanopoulos.” It must be the sniper fire going off around me.

Posted by: Mad as Hell | April 17, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Observer: go back to watching CNN where they are pro-Obama. The real world wants unbiased reporting.

Posted by: sheanne | April 17, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

What a Garbage Debate ! I could have spent the first hour playing with my son instead of trying to become more informed…. this debate was like an Entertainment Tonight show… and rerun for that matter ! Garbage.

Posted by: PulSamsara | April 17, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Mad as Hell – The republicans liked Obama’s performance in last night’s debate so much they said:
9:19 pm ET: A Republican strategist offers this, to ABC’s Karen Travers: “I think we’re going to buy 90 minute infomercials in October to replay this . . . I can’t believe Obama’s answer on Ayers. It’s like he never even considered the question. Doesn’t he do debate prep?! His answer was so bad/wrong/misleading/offensive – it’s going to be a huge problem for him . . .”

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

What was that debate all about? That wasn’t just bad, it was execrable. The perfect emetic.

Posted by: cassius | April 17, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

I was sick of news/medias for constantly trashing Hillary days and nights since the beginning of this year. However, for the first time in my adult life, I am so proud of ABC news for standing up and asking real questions to God Obama where rest of other journalists continue to worship him. Way to go ABC! You gained the great credibility for practicing fairness and Keep up the great job that you are doing.

Posted by: Herm | April 17, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

How can any one run for presidency and be so stupid?

Posted by: Jim | April 17, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE TO HEAR QUESTIONS ABOUT POLICY. TOO BAD THIS ONES ALREADY OVER. I GUESS THE CLINTONS THINK THAT IF THEY CANT WIN (AND ITS TOO LATE, THEY CANT!)THEY MIGHT AS WELL TAKE THE PARTY WITH THEM. THEY KNOW ITS ALREADY OVER BUT THEY HAVE TO PUNISH SOMEONE OR SOMETHING. OBAMA HAS SHOWN, THROUGH HIS MISTAKES, THE TRUE SELF-CENTERED NATURE OF 2 TYRANTS.

Posted by: FARISSBILL | April 17, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

NO Obama TODAY, NO Obama TOMORROW, NO Obama NEXT WEEK, NO Obama NEXT MONTH, NO Obama in NOVEMBER, NO Obama EVER..If you think BUSH is a nut case just wait until you get this nut case Obama and his America HATING wife in the Whitehouse..He reminds me of a little boy running in to tell his mama that that nasty girl next door just hit me.. He is a whiner…BOO HOO POOR Obama.

Posted by: Pat M | April 17, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

NO Obama TODAY, NO Obama TOMORROW, NO Obama NEXT WEEK, NO Obama NEXT MONTH, NO Obama in NOVEMBER, NO Obama EVER..If you think BUSH is a nut case just wait until you get this nut case Obama and his America HATING wife in the Whitehouse..He reminds me of a little boy running in to tell his mama that that nasty girl next door just hit me.. He is a whiner…BOO HOO POOR Obama.

Posted by: Pat M | April 17, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

My god is Senator Obama weak. Grow a set already and answer the damb questions. If you can’t answer the stupid questions that Gibson and Stephanopoulis threw out at you, how in the world will you be able to handle real issues.
Junior senator Obama is a long way away from being able to run a country.

Posted by: Ted | April 17, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Here’s a link to an Obama we haven’t seen before:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/04/obamaflipsoffcl.html
I just went to the site someone referenced on another blog. Obama gave Hillary the finger during one of his stump speeches today. Obama is the least presidential candidate on the planet. For Hillary to be on the receiving end of Obama’s obvious invective isn’t that surprising. I’m never surprised when he, his surrogates, or supporters retreat to ad hominine attacks.

Posted by: Emily | April 17, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

How can anyone be stupid enough to believe Obama’s false promises?

Posted by: Erica | April 17, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

all you people leaving abc should tune in to fox news fair & balanced.you might learn the real truth about obama. “mccain all the way”

Posted by: sc | April 17, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Herm, SAY IT AGAIN AND AGAIN.AGREE WITH YOU 100%.I LIKE IT.FIRST TIME IN MY ADULT LIFE I AM PROUD OF ABC TOO.ABC FOR EVER!!!!

Posted by: jayn | April 17, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Great job ABC. Obama had a hard time because he’s not use to answering question in person.So in frount of the crowd today he made fun.He didn’t seem to look like he was having fun last night.Media gave him a pass too long .Glad to see he’s not getting anymore passes.Time he starts answering questions.No one even knows this man that they want to put in the WH.

Posted by: Shady | April 17, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

CONGRATS to ABC for the best debate yet!
First your questions were the ones America has been asking for weeks now at the office and home.
Second When the two could not come up with an an answer their babbling let us kknow just how scared they are.
IF they fear two TV guys what happenes if the get the big job and have to face real fear?
Again, ABC just did it right and the prof is your audience was large and they did not leave!
GREAT JOB ABC

Posted by: AllAmericanBoy | April 17, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

CONGRATS to ABC for the best debate yet!
First your questions were the ones America has been asking for weeks now at the office and home.
Second When the two could not come up with an an answer their babbling let us kknow just how scared they are.
IF they fear two TV guys what happenes if the get the big job and have to face real fear?
Again, ABC just did it right and the prof is your audience was large and they did not leave!
GREAT JOB ABC

Posted by: AllAmericanBoy | April 17, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

CONGRATS to ABC for the best debate yet!
First your questions were the ones America has been asking for weeks now at the office and home.
Second When the two could not come up with an an answer their babbling let us kknow just how scared they are.
IF they fear two TV guys what happenes if the get the big job and have to face real fear?
Again, ABC just did it right and the prof is your audience was large and they did not leave!
GREAT JOB ABC

Posted by: AllAmericanBoy | April 17, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

CONGRATS to ABC for the best debate yet!
First your questions were the ones America has been asking for weeks now at the office and home.
Second When the two could not come up with an an answer their babbling let us kknow just how scared they are.
IF they fear two TV guys what happenes if the get the big job and have to face real fear?
Again, ABC just did it right and the prof is your audience was large and they did not leave!
GREAT JOB ABC

Posted by: AllAmericanBoy | April 17, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Dogsoldier -
We don’t want a 100 year old man running this country. He probably doesn’t have his own teeth!

Posted by: Mad as Hell | April 17, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Soon a new world will dawn.

Posted by: AmericanTemplar | April 17, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

These Obama bloggers got paid by his campaign to make ABC look bad.
It’s on CBS news toninght.
There were about 1500 complain Katie Couric said.
The other networks did not mention his relation with Ayers after 9/11 . They just said ABC asked him about his neighbor in Chicago.
That’s not true!
Ayers on his board after 9/11.
OBAM IS INVISIBLE MAN
CAN NOT BE TOUCHED.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

ABC–shame..SHAME…SHAME.. on you guys Charlie and George ‘re crooks of journalism. ABC has loss credibility and maybe viewers. I and my family will not watch ABC anymore…ABC full of bias, dumbfounded and misleading/misinformation….shame…shame…ABC..

Posted by: PATEE | April 17, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

The issue to me wasn’t the candidates and their responses, but the total lack of professionalism by the ABC commentators. I look to Charlie and George for balance and high standards. Their one-sided questions, behavior, focus and personal intensity were surprising to me. Their’s was such a poor approach compared to the other networks that have hosted debates. ABC has hit a very low point with this performance. And this was by commentators that up till now we have regularly watched and respected!

Posted by: Chuck | April 17, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

The issue to me wasn’t the candidates and their responses, but the total lack of professionalism by the ABC commentators. I look to Charlie and George for balance and high standards. Their one-sided questions, behavior, focus and personal intensity were surprising to me. Their’s was such a poor approach compared to the other networks that have hosted debates. ABC has hit a very low point with this performance. And this was by commentators that up till now we have regularly watched and respected!

Posted by: Chuck | April 17, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

this is ridiculous… abc news should stop telling everyone how to feel about the candidates. they hosted one of the worst debates i’ve ever seen but somehow claim that obama stumbled. he repeatedly brushed off trivial topics and asked to talk about something worth-while. why don’t you(ABC) start reporting the news that adults want/need to know about. the cable company already has a show to cover the he-said/she-said. E! tv.

Posted by: nm | April 17, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Shame…shame…ABCNEWS. George and Charlie monsters of journalism….WHERE IS MARK PENN AND COLUMBIAN DEAL…WHERE IS BILL AND $800,000, WHERE QUESTION ON 109M…..ELISTS……………..Shame????….

Posted by: Pajemo | April 17, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Threaten to Boycott Disney???
Don’t worry ABC, I just came back from DisneyWorld. Most of the visitors are not local but foreigner. Most of them are European because their Euro are higher compare to US$
Great jobs Charlie and George…
Stand up for American people.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

ABC moderators of the “debate of the century” put us all to sleep. No one cares about any of the candidate’s trivial slipups,or who they talked to 20 years ago, or about hilarys trip to bosnia or reverend wright. We didn’t get to hear issues we are all conflicted about. How the UN can take over its mandate to police the planet against genocide, famine, global warming, oil wars, and for nuclear disarmament and fair trade..(since oil companies want profits- not survival, we can’t ) WE didn”t get to hear about universal health care without profits,failing primary and secondary education,a failing consumerist economy,about bush’s trashing of the constitution,and election democracy in Florida, or new investigations into 9\11. All this you covered up. get out from between the people and the candidates

Posted by: peter bissell | April 17, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

ABC moderators of the “debate of the century” put us all to sleep. No one cares about any of the candidate’s trivial slipups,or who they talked to 20 years ago, or about hilarys trip to bosnia or reverend wright. We didn’t get to hear issues we are all conflicted about. How the UN can take over its mandate to police the planet against genocide, famine, global warming, oil wars, and for nuclear disarmament and fair trade..(since oil companies want profits- not survival, we can’t ) WE didn”t get to hear about universal health care without profits,failing primary and secondary education,a failing consumerist economy,about bush’s trashing of the constitution,and election democracy in Florida, or new investigations into 9\11. All this you covered up. get out from between the people and the candidates

Posted by: peter bissell | April 17, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

looks like were gonna be stuck with McBush for the next 4,by the time the blinds come off the obama people its going to be to late,everyone thought bush was the man for the job and look how that ended,well almost he still has a few more months to screw up the USA even more. Like obama can fix this mess alone. oh jessie jackson,al sharpton,and all those MLK quotes should fix all the problems we have in a snap of the finger.HOPE in one hand and sh*t in the other -you know the results……..

Posted by: james | April 17, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

The real issues of the debate last night was brought into full view by the ABC moderators.
The judgement and character of anyone who would host former associates of the Weather underground in their home is worthy of due consideration.
The Obamas and their true convictions have yet to be completely vetted to the American voters, but the job of bringing the light to bear on their true intent for the future of the United States will continue.

Posted by: Jayhawk | April 17, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Jack Smith,
I’m one of that smart person. I believe you.
My fellow workers also believe there is something behind his campaign.
Big companies are behind him.
That’s why HE IS INVISIBLE MAN.
Nobody can touch him.
He is innocent as GOD.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Obama in debate…
Bitter and angry…
Change we can all fear…

Posted by: Jayhawk | April 17, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

I will never vote for a mother that lies all the time….what example is she displaying to our kids.
AS FOR ABC/FOX…. SUCK AS A NETWORKS…

Posted by: PETE IN NEW YORK | April 17, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Last night’s debate will go down as the worst performance by a network TV in the history of televised debates. The former Clintonista (George Stephanopolus) and a Clinton donor (Charlie Gibson) teamed-up with Hillary to throw the kitchen sink at Senator Obama. They ganged up on him 3-1. It was a political hit job.

Posted by: Jackie | April 17, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Last night’s debate will go down as the worst performance by a network TV in the history of televised debates. The former Clintonista (George Stephanopolus) and a Clinton donor (Charlie Gibson) teamed-up with Hillary to throw the kitchen sink at Senator Obama. They ganged up on him 3-1. It was a political hit job.

Posted by: Jackie | April 17, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.

Posted by: Johnny B. Good | April 17, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

The health insurance is a scam, you may pay the premium for long years and if you get sick they cancel your insurance becous you’r sick.

Posted by: D | April 17, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

I will never vote for a mother that lies all the time….what example is she displaying to our kids.
AS FOR ABC/FOX…. SUCK AS A NETWORK…

Posted by: PETE IN NEW YORK | April 17, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

D:
YOu are right about the health insurance crisis in this country. I don’t have insurance right now despite having a full-time job. I felt like turning off the TV last night after half an hour cuz I felt like it had nothing to do with me. It was all about gaffes and “he said, she said” stuff. There was nothing about health insurance.

Posted by: Sydney | April 17, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Hillary08,
Thanks.
Could you identify them to FBI ?
You could ask ABC to give their identity to FBI.
Death threaten is something we have to take it seriously.
They have to respect the laws.
From here we can justify who are his supporters even not all of them are bad.
They are so violent and misbehaved even they go to college.

Posted by: crisis08 | April 17, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Obama should surrender and step down, and take his wife and his spiritual mentor, pack their bags and go back to Africa.

Posted by: Dragon | April 17, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Obama had a little whupping last night.
Hillary managed to bite off little chunk of Obama’s little behind..
Obama acting like a little boy describing how he got beat last ninght.
Hillary is the choice!!!

Posted by: jt | April 17, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Obama had a little whupping last night.
Hillary managed to bite off little chunk of Obama’s little behind..
Obama acting like a little boy describing how he got beat last ninght.
Hillary is the choice!!!

Posted by: jt | April 17, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Hillary claimed that she played varsity soccer in high school, eventhough her high school did not even have a soccer team. (one of her documented lies). After seeing Senator Obama play pick-up basketball, she claimed that she was a Point Guard on the McDonalds All American High School Basketball team.

Posted by: Johnny B. Good | April 17, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

omentum – Fixed news? You talking about MSNBC and CNN? Of course you are. What’s wrong lad? Little Obami can’t handle a few questions that have been floating around on the blogs for months? How in God’s name is Obama expected to handle real issues if he can’t deal with last night’s debate? What a whimp.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 17, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.

Posted by: Johnny B. Good | April 17, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Good grief–how juvenile! I’ve seen high school kids do that camouflaged flipping the bird gesture! GIving Hillary the bird! Yikes.
This is too much.
A senator playing that kind of game? about another senator? How very unpresidential.
I know VP Cheney really lowered the bar for civil behavior in the 21st C in the Senate. I did not expect a Democratic presidential primary candiate to follow that example by doing such a thing about another Democratic candidate.

Posted by: cud-zoo | April 18, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

omentum – Obami can’t even win the democratic primary outright. Us Hillary supporters are holding him in place and that’s not even counting republicans. Now, “if” Hillary were to lose who do you think we’re gonna vote for in the general? BTW, who do you think FL and MI will vote for?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 18, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

I’ll just say that I live in N.C. and I did early voting today and voted for OBAMA!

Posted by: kmhm | April 18, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Gotta go get ready to work the graveyard shift.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 18, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Shame, Shame on Obama. He did not want to answer very important questions relating to character, intergity and judgement. He looked like a dog scolded and needed to head home with his tail between his leg. He certainly was not PRESIDENTIAL in any manner. And today his supporters have been downright crazy nasty on the blogs blaming everyone except the loser, Obama.
Senator Obama, we do not want your brand of politics or your changes that are not in the best interest of ALL AMERICANS.
And today Senator was whining all day because of his own faults.

Posted by: Mary | April 18, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Dogsoldier,
Gosh,,how could you stand this guy?
I wonder where he goes to school?
Educated?

Posted by: crisis08 | April 18, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

I commend Charlie Gibson and Geeoge Stephanopoulous in their questioning at the debate last night….The Obamabots(funny that the story of a cult being busted is in the news at the same time)Anyway the Obama people are in some kind of alternate universe… perhaps the same kind of people that were stunned that Kerry lost the election in 2004 think that they had it rapped up for Obama… it just isnt so….I wish Obama would keep doing stuff like this cause the media wont cause him to do it … he is a frail fraud as far as Im concerned… from the very beginning I thought that Obama was trying to be like Pres Bush and I was right thats indisputable!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Stan Grose | April 18, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

At least with Teflon OBAMA we wouldn’t have any grown man sticking cigars in the pussies of women in the White House. The DEMS lost the White House, The senate and everything American as a result of The Clintons. Bill Clinton is a disgraced president ………… PERIOD! We in this very generation will make sure the White House is “Clean” like a whistle. Pussie whipping in the Oval office is forbidden ……… PERIOD.

Posted by: Che-3 | April 18, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

crisis08 – My Love fer omentum is like diarrhea. I can’t hold it in.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 18, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

If you’re a DOG needing a DOGBONE to make you smart like the rest of normal people you will most likely call yourself a “D-o-g-s-o-l-d-i-e-r” Hey! Dog here’s a Dog Biscuit.

Posted by: Che-3 | April 18, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

crisis08 – Night friend. I’m off to work, now!

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 18, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

the debate was a travesty. Americans tuned in to learn which candidate could help improve their lives in a time of desperate uncertainty and they US Weekly chasing down the antics of Britanny Spears and Paris Hilton. A disaster.
George and Charlie felt a need to knock down the frontrunner a step or two but who decided you two should insert yourselves in a decision that’s personal to each of us. They both have lost all credibility and should be fired.
An absolute disservice to the American people. This is the same favor that the media did for us all when the ushered Bush into the White House. Please Disney no more favors, your gift keeps giving longer than some of us will live.

Posted by: james Briggs | April 18, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Do you folks realize that these posts are a white living room conversation? Half of Obama’s votes come from the black community and they do not participate in these posts. The main participation from the Obama camp are plants who try to influence under generic pseudonyms. Obama’s main pre-occupation is to improve his 1/3 white acceptance rate to beat Hillary. I have no idea why he is so passionate as this 1/3 ratio will get worse when you throw in the republicans. He cannot win. Keep thinking about this and imagining it. Then you will realize what is really going on. You all think this is business as usual but it ain’t folks. The dems are in a fog lost in affirmative action thoughts. The republicans are very clear and they will win. This democrat will vote for McCain if Hillary is not the nominee.

Posted by: Hal from Lincoln | April 18, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Well it seem to me the Obama surogates and Obama himself have a way of finding white people who are so out of touch with politics that it,s easy for them to use them to make a false prop up of support to make himself look good and then he has the audascity to make it sound like he for everybody regardsless of race and that he really above all this petty politics Wow! Wake up stupid white people. Here,s a clue for you, If he were right about what he was saying about race in politics then why wouldn,t Hillary get more black votes? and of course you would say that is because, he is the first black to have a chance at winning, well if that,s true, then that in itself blows a hole right into what he is suppose to be all about rising above this sort of Washington politics. There are a slew of black politican in Wash. and across this country, to use the presidency as an excuse for getting elected as the first black president is in itself hypocrtical of his very message. Another words lets not make race the issues. His answer is, it,s not my fault I,am black it your fault so elect me president, because this women is a typical white women who wants to get elected president and you know I,am right. But you know I have to get those typical white people to cling to these seat behind me so I can get those other typical white voters to vote for me because Hillary won,t get the typical black vote. If he getting all the black votes then why aren,t those seats filled with a larger group of black voters. Because those typical white voters don,t know about politics so that get used by him. Wake up you slow minded liberal white voters if they can get away with calling Ferraro a racist, then if by chance he gets elected do you think they will call you. Ok Ok, if your thinking he won,t do that, he is really a great guy, then how do you explaing how he going about this campaign with attacking Hillary the way his surrogate,s have done. Now to hear it from Obama it,s not about his Pastor and Rezko or Ferrakhan or Chicago,s corruption politics.It,s about Washington politics and the same old same old, well folks he didn,t change the same old same old politics in Chicago!So think about it a little harder, because Hope might make you feel good, but it doesn,t put anything on the table. His campaign comes right out of the old counter culture movement with going after the youth, as youth goes he does good, but when it comes to expierence he always has a line of, that,s not what I meant and they,ve taken my words out of content and the same old Wash. politics etc. etc. etc. His only plan for America is to get himself elected, everthing else is right out of the party handbook. He has no plan of his own, everything is a copy just like Hillary said about zerox! But hey it,s ok, your just typical!

Posted by: karen flowers | April 18, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Don’t we already have a President who dismisses the people’s opinions??? As trivial and absurd as some of the questions are during the election, it is a part of running for public office. Let’s not act surprised. Obama is a politican and for once in this election, he is being treated like one. It’s only fair. I, for one, find it irritating that Senator Obama acts as though he already has the nomination. He knows that his supporters are not voting for him because of his policies. He knows they aren’t going to change their vote, because of his assoiciates. It gives him an out, when asked hard questions. He is able to falter, and his supporters stand there. He is using the underdog card, and he is running with it. Of course, he’s the frontrunner, so that won’t always work. I think he is running on more of a cosmetic change. He has a basic outline of what he is supposed to do, but he is getting votes more on his race, his name isn’t Clinton, and he claims to be a different kind of politics. As ruthless as politics is, and it does get ridiculous, I think the overall process is to cut through the superficial issues and get to the hearts of each candidates. Obama wasn’t to bypass that completely, and be elected. As an independent who did not vote during the primaries, I am glad I’m not a Democrat. The liberals are ruining it and the moderates want to jump ship. I’ll wait to see the candidates and VP’s in the GE to make my decision, but Obama MUST become more substantial. Democrats forget, that the rest of the country doesn’t share their beliefs, and to convince them it’s going to take much more than what he has offered so far.

Posted by: Ohplease! | April 18, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Hold it guys.
What is wrong with americans? Can’t u guys stop acting like kids for once? Do not let the Fourth Estate dictate to your minds forever. Use your God given intellect for once.
If you’re thinking, yes; I’m writing from England. And I have closely watched the elections in america.
Imagine your kid having a rare disease; Imagine your husband suffering from terminal cancer; your wife similar condition.
Imagine that great earthquake destroy your community. Remember 9-11.
Who did the greater percentage of people turn to?
My point; When situation is deperate, when life becomes uncertain, when hopes wane, we all turn to God.
A higher power to find answers and succour. Not because people don’t or never had faith, but because they do.
I find it ridiculous and annoying that you’ve spent the greater part of one week talking about Obama’s comments. ABC news wasted our time on this issue. The media just spin the most preposterous issues. There was no elitist view here, it was just common sense. Some (Brit Hume on FOX) went as far as comparing Obama’s statement with Karl Max. Horrible!
My advice to americans is not to miss the opportunity Barak Obama presents. Someone with a clear vision brings progress to a nation. Not shrewd politicians like Hillary Clinton or John McCain.
Don’t miss the boat.

Posted by: Commonsense bearer | April 18, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

Dear Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal, I agree. That shambles of a debate show was a load of rubbish and it has failed to let the big networks manipulate the election. We want change and we want it now Obama 2008

Posted by: John | April 18, 2008, 4:17 am 4:17 am

Commonsense bearer, with all due respect…I think it more pertinent for you to worry about your own politics rather than American’s. I find it hard to believe you have a true grasp on American politics, nor would I say that you are in any position to judge politicans here, as much as I have to judge yours.

Posted by: Ohplease! | April 18, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am

Enough said.
“With a week to go until Pennsylvania voters render their final verdict, Hillary Clinton has opened a nine-percentage point lead over Barack Obama in the Keystone State. The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey shows Clinton now attracts 50% of the vote while Obama earns 41%.
That’s a slight improvement for Clinton who led by five percentage points a week ago. ~updated an hour ago. Rasmussen.”
“The battle over Florida’s convention delegates may be taking its toll on Barack Obama’s prospects in the Sunshine State. For the second time in three months, John McCain enjoys a double digit lead over the Democratic frontrunner.
The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in Florida shows McCain attracting 53% of the vote while Obama earns 38%. Last month, amidst talk of a possible Florida revote, Obama had closed to within single digits of McCain. In February, however, Obama trailed McCain by sixteen points.
If McCain is matched against Hillary Clinton, the race is a toss-up—Clinton 45% McCain 44%. ”
Rasmussen ~updated an hour ago
Fifty-six percent (56%) of voters nationwide disagree with Barack Obama’s statement that people in small towns “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 25% agree with the Democratic frontrunner while 19% are not sure. ~ Updated a few days ago.
In Kentucky Hillary is ahead with 62% 5/20
Obama holds a 9% lead in NC 5/06
In IN Hillary is ahead with 55% 5/06
In WV she is ahead with 55% 5/13
Now, I realize things happen, but for him to comeback and beat a 28% spread is going to be hard. This is going to a convention. She will probably overtake him in popular vote.

Posted by: Ohplease! | April 18, 2008, 4:47 am 4:47 am

I think it’s about time we got some moderators with enough guts to throw out the questions that many Americans do want to hear. Like it or not, it’s the character we are trying to find out about, mostly for Hussein Obama, which most people don’t really know much about. Only his “It’s about change” comments that so many fools have fallen for. The silly Obama supporters are the only ones crying how bad this debate was, NOT. Obama’s character is and must be called into question since we find out about his anti-American pastor Rev. Wright, who in my opinion is not only a racist he is very un-American. He has never answered that question even close to satisfactory. The speech he gave was only to change the subject which he did not do worth a damn. Among other issues like William Ayers and his “we are friendly” comment is not what a presidential candidate should be anything thing like. I would not trust him to be my commander in chief. Today he is crying how they wasted his time with these questions claiming the America public wants to hear more important issues, like what Obama? What America needs to know is Who is this guy called Barack Hussien Obama? The first questions were very important to us “real patriotic Americans” who have no trouble wearing a lapel pin just because we love our country, what about you Obama? Cheap answer you gave there kid. As the days go by I can only hope and pray he does not win this nomination which will be disaster not only for the party but even more so for the nation should he somehow win the general election. God Help Us, because Barack will definitely not, with his lack of judgement or his inability to make a true stand on any issues and with his arrogant attitude, we would be in real trouble come a crisis to this nation. If Hillary does not win the nomination, which she should and is more electable than Barack. I will have to (regrettably) vote republican. The historic event many people are calling out for, this is only tokenism and not in the best interest of this great country of our’s. Go Hillary, you must win if we are to take the White House. Take it to the convention, all the way, if necessary. Keep the whiner Obama down where he belongs. But, one thing Hillary, Obama is NOT electable in the general election!!!!!

Posted by: Anthony M. Verdugo | April 18, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am

After Obama attempts to brush off his sorry debate performance, he needs to brush that chip from his shoulder!

Posted by: TRS | April 18, 2008, 6:13 am 6:13 am

I saw Obama brushing off legitimate criticism at one of his rallies yesterday. My God, I can honestly say I have never seen such arrogance and self-importance from someone seeking votes from the public. I hope small towm Pennsylvania comes out in droves against this fraud and gives him the bloody nose he deserves.

Posted by: Mark | April 18, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

Right on Anthony…..This debate was all about the candidates character. If the American people had understood this in the last election, we would not have the fool now currently in office. Character flaws can have a direct bearing on making hard decisions, just witness the mess we have in Iraq and this country by the stooge in office now. I don’t want another puppet in the Whitehouse taking orders from another Cheney type underling. Please America, look at what legislative experience Obama has to date, we don’t need more voting present. Character DOES mean something

Posted by: Tim | April 18, 2008, 6:44 am 6:44 am

Really not sure why people caught off guard about ABC debate two days ago obviously whoever thinking it was unfair achors handles everything unprofessional manner wake up to life. They “Clintons” had debate at their zone which means achors will definitely be harsh to Barack Obama that should be anyways cause republicans will do more than that, but each time Hillary and Bill Clinton open their mouths about negative issues that doesn’t solve the predicament we’re in currently about country standard of living, gas,economic,mortgage,education and war her chances of winning is very limit.

Posted by: Abdul Olufowobi | April 18, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am

Hillary was relaxed, poised, articulate and Presidential.
Obama was peevish, flustered, and definitely Not Ready for Primetime.
Which would be the stronger Democratic nominee?

Posted by: HoosierSue | April 18, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

If they had focused on the issues it would have been 2 hours of Obama saying “I agree with Senator Clinton”. I am glad they asked those questions. He not only whines, but so do his supporters when the media actually does their job and asks questions like Charlie and George did.
Don’t you want to know WHO your potential POTUS is associated with and his beliefs? I sure do.

Posted by: J | April 18, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am

As a supporter of Sen. Obama, I think that while he may not have come off polished and slick, like his opponent, he took the high road and demonstrated in front of millions of Americans that he is serious when he says we need to change Washington. You can’t change anything if you keep playing by the same old rules. The moderators squandered precious time on tabloid issues. How many times does Sen. Obama have to explain Rev Wright? There is nothing more of substance to be learned, so why beat a dead horse, especially with all of the serious issues facing this country? And if Rev Wright and the Weather Underground are fair game, why isn’t the Lewinsky scandal?
I believe Sen. Obama once again demonstrated he is a man of character. He never threw Rev. Wright under the bus. He hasn’t pandered to a bunch of idiots who think a flag pin on a lapel demonstrates a love of country. And he didn’t stoop to the level of the Clintons and ABC in throwing mud back. There was a reason he looked annoyed – he gets it. He gets it that Americans want a new direction and that we’ll never get anywhere if we keep playing the same stupid games.
In the meantime, ABC is banished from our household. Unless and until an apology from the moderators is forthcoming, I’ll get my news from MSNBC. If I wanted Sean Hannity’s opinion, I’d watch Faux News.

Posted by: Girgadis | April 18, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Your preening twosome could hardly have done a worse job. What a sorry spectacle ABC has made of itself.

Posted by: david | April 18, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

In watching the so call debate, it was the worst I had ever seen. It was a crucifiction. Why did it take so long to touch on the important issues? George & Charlie were completely out of their elements. In future debates I surely hope that the issues are focused on and not idiotic questions about the canadates personnel past or present life.

Posted by: Storm | April 18, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

My kids could of asked better questions to the candidates, and my oldest is 8. Terrible job ABC News!

Posted by: Paul | April 18, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

ABC’s disrespect for the American people was distasteful at best. People who vote in today’s elections are not stuck on stupid as they were in the past. We are informed, we are astute, we are intelligent, and we can see the bias and transparency of not only your agenda, but your prejudice. Shame on you……………meet us (The American People) at the General Election. GObama

Posted by: Inspired | April 18, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Please ABC and other networks, please go easy on Obama. He can only dish it out but the poor lad can’t take it.
The reason that the moderators DID NOT get into the real questions on the economy or gas prices until much later was that everyone knows that Obama doesn’t know anything about those things, so why ask.
The poor senator, he can only speak around issues, can be extremely vague and has promised the moon to ‘bitter’ Americans and the sheep that follow him around.
Also for those who thought that the only millionaires were the Clintons, look up the Obama tax returns (released quietly and with much media attention). The poor senator and his wife earned only a few millions (compare that to Joe Blow’s hefty 25 grand a year).
The Obamas were also very generous. They gave the poor Rev. Wright $26000.
The good Rev. Wright is building a small new home in an elite Chicago suburb (10,000 sq. ft. and costing only a few millions). The Rev. Wright who basically hates White people thought it would be best to observe his enemies in close proximity – the area he is moving into is 97% White.
The American voter is the most gulible. They voted for GW, not once but twice. Now they will probably vote for a president who is basically a novice and who can sell them dreams – but nothing substantive.
GW as president ruined our economy, and Obama of he becomes president will America a country built on rhetoric.
With presidents like this, it is no wonder that countries like China and India are calling the shots.

Posted by: Texas-Politico | April 18, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

When I think of Obama this is what comes to mind.
Well educated, pretends he is not
Super rich, prentends he is not
Very glib, but says he mangles his words
Not a Washington insider, but is very well-connected.
Says he is up and up, but has serious, questionable (even in Debates) links and relationships with characters like Rev. Wright, Tony Rezko, Weather Underground bomber and others we may never know.
For all this, the guy could not even articulate straight answers to any of the ‘main issues’ that he so much wanted in the debate.
Understand this, it is NOT that he has no clue on these issues, BUT he is intelligent enough to know that he cannot tell the American voter what he is thinking on these issues just yet. For that, you have to wait till after the elections (after he wins, then you will see the real Obama).
Once elected, don’t be surprised to see all of Obama’s shady friends come out of the woodwork to help ‘build America’ and help America see the ‘Change’.
Well! you heard it here first.
Hillary supporters, wake up in Pennsylvania and other places. You have to give her a huge-margin win in the rest of the states to give the American voter a better choice than this snake-oil salesman.

Posted by: Texas-Politico | April 18, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

I still can’t believe we are lucky enough to have someone like Obama willing to serve as President. Perhaps there is hope for America after all….
I loved the Obama video showing him brushing off the idiocy from the ABC debate.

Posted by: HB | April 18, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Excellent job ABC. One of the best debates of all times!
Its nice to see politicians asked the tough questions that a lot of us are wanting answers too. These questions would have never been answered if not asked in that debate. How can any of you not consider these topics important. If you don’t want to know if your candidate is hanging out with terrorist, or hate spewing preachers, then that tells a lot about your character as well. If you haven’t heard their position on all the other topics by now, then its because of your laziness, not because of ABC.
Character is a very important trait for the President. Its hard to fake that. No matter how much the media tries.

Posted by: Salukidog | April 18, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Excellent job ABC. One of the best debates of all times!
Its nice to see politicians asked the tough questions that a lot of us are wanting answers too. These questions would have never been answered if not asked in that debate. How can any of you not consider these topics important. If you don’t want to know if your candidate is hanging out with terrorist, or hate spewing preachers, then that tells a lot about your character as well. If you haven’t heard their position on all the other topics by now, then its because of your laziness, not because of ABC.
Character is a very important trait for the President. Its hard to fake that. No matter how much the media tries.

Posted by: Salukidog | April 18, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

THAT’S WHY OBAMA CAN’T WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION IF HE IS THE NOMINEE. HE CAN’T WITHSTAND THE REPUBLICANS. IF HE CAN’T ANSWER HARD QUESTIONS ON A DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, DO YOU THINK HE CAN WITHSTAND A REPUBLICAN ATTACK? OBAMA WOULD LOOK LIKE A LITTLE BOY OR AT LEAST REPUBLICANS WILL MAKE HIM LOOK LIKE A LITTLE BOY. BOY, ANOTHER 4 YEARS OF BUSH ADMINISTRATION IF OBAMA IS THE NOMINEE.
OBAMA HAS NOTHING TO OFFER TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OTHER THAN TRYING TO BE THE 1ST BLACK PRESIDENT. THIS COUNTRY CAN’T AFFORT TO EXPERIMENT ON PRESIDENCY SO WE NEED TO VOTE FOR A PRESIDENT WHO WILL NOT LOOK DOWN ON THE HARD WORKING AMERICAN. WHO IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH EXTREMIST GROUPS OR RELIGION. WE NEED A PRESIDENT WHO IS PATRIOTIC. GOD SAVE AMERICA IF OBAMA IS THE NOMINEE.

Posted by: JAMES, PA, INDEPENDENT | April 18, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Great job! ABC

Posted by: finally | April 18, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

I found Obama’s antics offensive and arrogant when he acted like he was brushing dandruff off his shoulders, when talking about the debate.
Obama has been in congress one year and we know nothing about him – his character, his integrity, his judgement. What are his accomplishments? He hasn’t even held a committee meeting for the committee that he chairs!!! (his televised excuse was that he’s been too busy campaigning!)
Due to Obama’s lack of experience, we must examine who he associates with and his past actions or judgements. These are all measures of his character; what type of man he will be in the future, what type of judgement he exercises and what kind of leader he might or might not make.
If Obama is capable of such eloquent, moving speeches, why then does he bumble words or make clumsy statements when talking without a script? Are the speeches truly reflective of Obama or are the speeches just words what the speech writers think America wants to hear? Obama has made wonderful promises – but gives no firm details as to how he will carry anything out.
As for the debate – the media has treated Obama with kidd gloves while Clinton was heaviliy scrutinized and criticized. It’s about time the media turned up the heat on Obama.

Posted by: GrannySunni | April 18, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

The policies of Clinton and Obama are virtually identical. Clinton has said that she has baggage and everyone has rumaged around in it and she’s still here. We know all about the Clintons. Obama has a thin resume and so we must find out all we can about his relationships and associations. Obama keeps spouting his mantra of change, change, change. We don’t know what kind of change he wants to bring about. Is he here to help all Americans or just particular groups of Americans? I’m voting for Hillary but I’d sooner vote for John McCain than for radical Obama, who is a big question mark. Go Hillary!

Posted by: Melissa | April 18, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

What an arrogant piece. You’re going to have a radical leftist VS a moderate republican. I choose anything over a radical of anything. This guy has no idea how capitalism works. He want to transform the system to socialism similar to Europe. But he doesn’t understand that European countries are much smaller than the US. It will not work in the US. Socialism will discourage people from working hard. Why would you want to work hard if most of your hardworking money will go to tax to support others. that’s why Europeans don’t work as hard as we do here.

Posted by: iowa | April 18, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

I am wondering if Charlie G. and George S. get paid by ABC or Clinton.
ABC = Approved By Clinton

Posted by: Angela | April 18, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

I just watched the video of Obama ‘brushing off’ the untrue accusations made at the debate. He is one classy man. I am so proud he is running for president. I am a white, 50 year old mom of three but I can honestly say we’ve never had a better chance of turning this country around, to make the government actually work for all the people, not just the rich and well-connected, than we have right now with Obama as our president.

Posted by: Lydia | April 18, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

I thought, given the circumstances, that Obama performed admirably. While the talking heads have portrayed this as a critical loss, virtually every poll taken since has shown Obama to be the clear winner. Hillary also performed well. It almost seemed as if she knew the questions in advance. Her answers seemed scripted. However, She did nothing to diminish the perception that she is waging a negative campaign. I thought Obama showed class by not attacking Hillary when he had the opportunity. Mentioning the fact that Bill pardoned 2 members of the Weather Underground was classic. If the intent was to prepare the candidates for the GE, they missed the boat. I doubt McCain is going to mention anything about a Pastor that has made controversial statements. The attempt to tie Obama to Ayers has born no fruit. There has been no evidence of any wrong doing with Rezko. If there was,it certainly would have come to light by now. If the best that the Republicans can muster is the “bitter” remark and the “flag pin” issue, that will be perceived as a “reach”. One additional comment. The Capital Gains Tax issue was not portrayed in its proper context. While it might appear to boost the economy, it still only benefits about the upper 3.5% of Americans. Chuck was looking out for his own self interests.

Posted by: TheLight315 | April 18, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I was one of those rare voters that had not made up my mind yet between any of the candidates. I was ver concerned about some of the things I had heard about Obama but could not get any info about it on any of the OBAMA Cable News Networks. I was thrilled to hear some of these questions being asked in the debate. My only problem is now I don’t know any more than I did before. He didn’t answer anything. Just covered it with flowers and handed it to us and totally expected us to smile and be pleased and we took a drink of the Kool Aide. He had an “How Dare You stoop to aking the Great Obama any questions about my choices and decisions!” If I didn’t think he was a snob of the worst kind before the debate, I certainly do now by his reaction yesterday on the stump. “Just Brush It Off”!!! It is just the pesky little knats that are bothersome, NO BIG DEAL! And of course that reference comes right straight out of a Gangsta Rap song. What else would you expect? I feel so sorry for you and your Wife Obama. Respect is something that you earn and you obviously have no idea what that word means. My vote goes to Hillary now and if she is not the candidate than it goes to McCane. Michelle is right, THIS WILL BE THE ONLY TIME YOU WILL EVER RUN FOR PRESIDENT, THANK THE LORD ABOVE FOR THAT!!!

Posted by: Judi | April 18, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

ABC owns us an appology and then get rid of GEORGE and CHARLIE. I used to watch Charlie, but since he sinks too low,i am disconneting my TiVO today…VERY SIMPLE.
FOX/ABC supported government of the rich and not for the middle or average Americans……Watch NBC,CBS AND CNN FOR RELIABLE AND UNBIASED NEWS…

Posted by: PETE IN NEW YORK | April 18, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Pitiful debate, truly pitiful. I didn’t really expect any better from Stephanopolis. He’s just a cute dumb kid, in there to do gossip, the more trivial, the better. But I did expect some intelligence and RELEVANCE from Charlie Gibson. It was sad to see him act like that. It was sad to waste the country’s time with that silliness.

Posted by: Anne | April 18, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

To the comments that HILLARY WON THE DEBATE (???!!)
In spite the clear bias by the ABC moderators attacking OBAMA,
the ABC polls shows:
Who won the Democratic debate?
Sen. Barack Obama— 45,602 (67%)
Sen. Hillary Clinton-17,155 (25%)
It was a tie———-5,457 (08%)
Total Vote: 68,214
HOW YOU EXPLAIN THAT ??
TOM

Posted by: TOM WITTMANN | April 18, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

You know ABC is in trouble when even NPR attacked Gibson and Stephanopoulos this morning. Rather than defend themselves for their awful debate questions, Gibson and Stephanopoulos refused to speak to NPR. Hopefully, these brave ‘journalists’ will soon find more a more appropriate work environment at Fox News.

Posted by: infpinfp | April 18, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Stop whining Obamanations, those were the kind of questions Republicans have faced for fifty years from the MSM.

Posted by: todd | April 18, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

I don’t understand why people keep saying Obama hasn’t answered questions on Ayers or Wright or the flag or whatever other trivial nonsense you want to throw his way. He answers the questions and when he doesn’t say what Hillary wants him to say then he’s accused of dodging the question. He’s not friends with Ayers – they sat on a board together. Why does there have to be more? He didn’t put a flag on his lapel – big deal. I don’t where one either and I spent 20 years in the military. I don’t understand why we have to beat our candidates to death before they can become president. No wonder it’s so difficult to get great leaders to want to run for the job.

Posted by: jb | April 18, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Thank You ABC. The debate, though not conventional, was needed to show the personal side of these two candidates.
Hillary spoke the truth about the republican attacks and which one is better prepared to handle them.
Obama flunked and the Democratic party will also, come November, if he is the nominee.
Keep it up ABC, don’t let either of these two off the hook.

Posted by: Cindy | April 18, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

OBAMA IS THE WINNER. HE IS THE NOMINEE. ALL THE HILLARY CLINTON DREAMERS AND STILL DREAMING. WAKE UP. SHE CANT, SHE WILL NEVER, WIN. WHY? CUS OBAMA HAS WON ALREADY! WAKE UP HILLARIANS!!!! WAKE UP!!!!DOESNT MATTER IF SHE WINS THE REMAINING CONTESTS. SHE WILL STIL NOT MEET UP. AND SUPPERDELEGATES DESPISE HER. SHE LOOKS BAD. SHE IS A BAD PERSON.

Posted by: Winners | April 18, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

arizonajan:
Political Operatives like
George Stephanopoulus should not be
allowed to infiltrate the news media!
They can be pundits and appear as guests
on news shows but should not pretend to
be unbiased journalists!
This is one of the things that’s wrong with the MSM, too many people with
an agenda!
Is ABC going to hire Carville and Begala
next? How about Lanny Davis?

Posted by: reaganfan | April 18, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

For your blind and deaf Hillary fanatics
which think that Hillary did a good who won the Democratic debate, with the help by the ABC moderators:
LOOK HERE ON ABC POLL:
========================
========================
WHO WON ?
Sen. Barack Obama—-45,602
Sen. Hillary Clinton-17,155
It was a tie———-5,457
========================
========================
TOM

Posted by: TOM WITTMANN | April 18, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

I would never ABC would attack Obama with Hillary negative attack I would have thought CNN would have attack Obama, ABC lost my respect. Obama is strong leader, Obama is going against Hillary, Bill, Chelsea, Media, McCain, Bush, you know Obama is still proven how strong he is holding up Obama wins my vote

Posted by: Tom | April 18, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

SOMETIMES I WONDER THAT HAVING AMNESIA
IS A PRE-CONDITION TO BE A HILLARY SUPPORTER:
OBAMA WHINES OR POUTS ??
Remember Hillary and her campaign complaining loudly that she is losing because of the press and also complaining to the MSNBC moderators that
she gets always the questions first,
between dozen other ??
What happened in this debate was unprocedented. Even the question of
Stephanopoulos asking Hillary if she thinks that OBAMA IS ELECTABLE was made
with the intention to allow her again to
highlight her attacks points on OBAMA,
but she showed a clear lack of perception by saying “YES-YES-YES, SO
LOSING HER LAST and only CHANCE TO INDUCE SUPERDELEGATES TO VOTE FOR HER !!
TOM

Posted by: TOM WITTMANN | April 18, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

ABC should be ashamed of Gibson and Stephanopoulus. The first 45 minutes they simply rehashed old questions to the candidates while the American people waited for serious questions about the economy ,Iraq, and climate change. Anyone at ABC who helped plan the debate disrespected the American people by the trivial questions.

Posted by: Jack Scanlon | April 18, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Obama and for some reason the American media is for this racist clown. The rest of folks in the real world want Hilary not a guy who is so full of hate for his white mother. Thanks ABC unlike NBC’s Chris Matthews who is seems to be on this guys payroll or the rest of the media you showed this guy for what he is a loud mouth person who likes black racists. And can’t face things unless they are going his way. Maybe REV. Wright will sooth your soul to get you all fired up now Obama. Why don’t you run in Kenya.

Posted by: CMorgan | April 18, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

I’d use only three words to summarize ABC’s performance during this latest debate: Shame on you!

Posted by: Kollie Zean | April 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Obama doesn’t need to “brush off” the debate. Every intelligent voter and credible news outlet already did it for him. The only bad performance was by the ABC News mediators (I mean agents of the Karl Rovesque Clinton Smear Machine).

Posted by: Mia | April 18, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Obama is showing that he has true character, and that whatever the Clintons, republicans, or news organizations and the journalist that work for them, throw at him, he will still stand and will not fall.
As for Mr. Stephanopoulos, seems you left all the tough questions for Obama, and that is fine because he should answer them, but were was the questions from your former boss, Mrs. Clinton. Seems she trained you up well!!!!!

Posted by: danielle | April 18, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

TODD, JUST SO YOU KNOW, MSM HAS NOT BEEN AROUND FOR 50 YEARS. SORRY

Posted by: jimt | April 18, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Obama may not be a Girly Man (or maybe he is) but he is a classic con man that will trash Hillary be 20 minutes straight in the most NEGATIVE way… then spend the next 20 Minutes ridiculing he as a Negative OLD Washington Politician… START A FIRE – CRY FIRE… a classic con game.
How about him saying he never knew about the REv. Wright racism even though the tapes war sold for years or saying he does not take money from PACS and Special Interests… At this point he takes more than Hillary and always has… but she’s not lying to the American people and playing a shell game funneling the money through wives, lawyers, and bundlers. He’s a con. Who voted for the Bush/Cheney Energy Act… when Hillary protested and voted No.
He’s and underhanded guy and vicious as any politician ever was.

Posted by: Steve | April 18, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Wake up… These are the questions Republicans and independents are and will talk about. Obama’s position on the issues are clear — What She said… He also lies about his positions and says he is not funnelling money from PACS and Special Interests and surely is — Big Time.
People are interested in his integrity. We know he tries to copy all hillary’s solutions, and I heard him say in the debate that he never lnew abour Rev. Wright’s racist speaches accept those tapes have been seeling for fund raising for years… So I heard an outright lie, and that tell me about How skilled and brazen Obama is about lying under pressure.
Obama voted for the Bush/Cheney Energy Bill and Hillary opposed it… So when he talked about the issues all he said was how he would be different… What’s different about a Democrat supporting Bush and Cheney to ripp us off fuel, or that Obama reveres Raegan and Bush Sr. That is telling. I hope others read between the lines. Obama acts like he expects the debate to be like a paid commercial or a news story placed by his strategist Axelrod. Wake up. This is the real world and most of what Obama says, is really the opposite of what he really does.

Posted by: Cass | April 18, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

I think that ABC had a debate that was long overdue.Thank you for a fair and balance debate.Do you need a pillow Sen. Obama?

Posted by: Nana | April 18, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Have you seen the video of Obama mocking an laughing about the debate — he loves to m ock doesn’t he — that seesm to be his element. It’s like he has two parts of his personality, the carefully crafted ?mesages of hope and change” and the bitter Obama who wrote the racist books and loves to be around other racists and extremists. Scary.
Now he says he won’t do any more debates, and a journalist asked him if he was complaining and he said, “Did you hear me complan”, Hillary is the one that’s been complaining all this time. I watched the video, and heard him whinning complaining, laughing and mocking, and saw him flip off in his usual underhanded manner, and the crown cheered. Now he’s denying it. Big Surprise. Obama get’s caught… and points the finger at her and said, not me… she did it. Tha’s been his game all along. He’s unfit to be president. I wonder what change he’s make happen in the Senate.
All the qustions they asked are the same questions you see all over the internet. I think he thought he could intimidate the press from vetting him forever, and get special treatment, and he can’t take the heat, so he’s acting like a child. Yeah, he’s ready to lead the USA – Not.
Hillary can face McCain and win and has solutions I believe in, I can’t believe Obama has come this far.

Posted by: Mark | April 18, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

(The goal is the formation of a separate black nation on the North American Continent replete with a 500,000 man army and nuclear weapons.)I WILL VOTE FOR HIM IF THIS IS TRUE.we will need another wall built tho…

Posted by: james | April 18, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

A man who involves himself in his own dirty business he soiles his own clothes. That´s why Barack Obama had to brush his shoulders after the debate. I really don´t believe in this manipulating man any longer. He is spreading anti-Semitism into the hearts of young Americans. Isn´t one of his friends in Chicago from Syria, or …. what more is he hiding. European
PS
Jimmy Carters has now been sweeped under the carpet just like Rev. Wright and Obamas Syrian friend in Chicago. What a false guy! Please somebody – sweep Obama under the carpet too .

Posted by: Elisabeth | April 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Enough of the media. They entice the candidates to play low and dirty and even when they do not stoop to this, the media just keeps digging and picking till it grates a nerve on one of them, and then the silly bickering
starts. And we don’t know till near the end …..where anyone stands on anything, so I feel like the first half was nonsense caused by the media and a waste of the American people’s time. How low do we keep falling before it is enough? I am so ashamed of ABC news commentators for orchestrating this. It used to not be your style Charley and George. Everyone I talked to at my place of business thought the same thing, and said they wouldn’t waste their time watching a media run debate again. And you know…….that’s not fair to any candidate. They all want to talk about their agenda’s for presidency. Why don’t you just let them, without all the other nonsense. Who cares about that, our country is in trouble and we don’t address the REAL issues till a debate is nearly done. Shame on you.

Posted by: leeann | April 18, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Obama’s association with Ayers should put him on a domestic terrorist watch list. Wake up America. Obama is Trouble. How can one even think of voting for someone who is aligned with yet another radical. Is this what America needs? I am convinced it is not — we simply cannot trust Obama – ever under any circumstance.

Posted by: David | April 18, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Great job Charlie!!! You did ask tough, intelligent questions and they were important. What is so wrong about actually presenting journalism at its finest–questions that expect an intelligent response? Have the candidates been so spoon fed by journalists that they have forgotten how to answer REAL questions? Hats off to George and Charlie. You made it count!

Posted by: Debbie | April 18, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Don’t even call it a debate! Name one issue they debated on? What a joke. Obama is not “whining” about anything. Only complained that the issues most Americans want covered – were not. I’m tired of Hillary trying to act cordial and genuine, another joke. Do y’all remember the drama of the 90s? Yuck! How quickly you forget. Good thing we’ll never have to re-live those days because she’ll never make it.

Posted by: Rene | April 18, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Hillary has been associated with Rezko as well. There are pictures of her and Bill with him. Her husband pardoned people involved in the weather underground (Ayers’ group). Obama just served on a board with him. She is a nut case! Does everyone remember whitewater and all the crap from when Bill was in office? How can anyone remotely want to go back there. I don’t trust the Clintons AT ALL – they lie and will do anything to WIN. They make me sick.

Posted by: ME | April 18, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Previous debates have been simple extensions of obama’s rallies- he has full permission to sound as good as he can without having to answer to real criticism, live, on camera.
Good job ABC for finally pulling Obama’s blank check and putting him in positions where he has to explain himself on the dirty issues that, unfortunately, strongly shape public opinion.
The Republicans are going to do what they usually do: hammer hammer hammer- at non-policy, headliner issues like the swift boat ads. Obama’s gotta be able to handle this at least.

Posted by: hosater | April 18, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

I did not like this debate this was the first debate that was not fair and balance. I wish people in America would wake up and realize that media and these so called pundts on television only wants us to focus on trivial things and not real issues.

Posted by: Jocelyn | April 18, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Your debate was the worst I have seen. I felt like I was watching a tabloid. How can you equate personal attacks to having a debate? I intend to forgo watching This week with George. His bias to Clinton really showed. One gotcha question for Hillary and five for Obama. It was disgusting.

Posted by: Senior from AZ | April 19, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

This was one of the most slanted debates I have ever seen. I do not mine asking tough questions but be fair. It was evident that somebody was in favor of Clinton and not Obama. In a time when gas is $4 a gallon, America is fighting two wars, and I have lost close to $6,000 in my 401K in the past quarter, all these people can do is talk about a preacher who is not running for president, a professor who teaches english somewhere who is not running for president, and remarks that Omama has admitted were a mistake. It is clear to me that some reporters have gone too far in respect for the American people and the political process. What do I mean? If you are going to represent us in debates ask some questions that matter. Let me give you a re few? What is your plan for education? What is your plan for the economy? What is your plan for healthcare? What is your foreign policy plan? Please grow up and act like adults!

Posted by: Rev L Lewis | April 19, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

This debate was awful. I have no journalism experience and I could have come up with better questions and issues to cover. Charlie and George are elitist in that they talk down to and debase the American people by adressing mostly campaign gaffes, which deserve some attention, but go light on the substantive issues. They didn’t even do any journalistic work other than their bogus Ayers reference.

Posted by: Lady | April 19, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am

The only way I can think of to show my disgust with George and Charlie and the worst performance by moderaters of a so-called debate is to never watch ABC news again.

Posted by: mike | April 19, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

I’m glad ABC brought up all the upsetting issues about Obama. There’s so much about him that we don’t know. I keep thinking that if his mother lived her life today, Obama would have been aborted. Doesn’t diminish his life?

Posted by: Mary | April 19, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

Shame on you Charlie Gibson for running such a poor debate! I used to respect you, not any more. How could you accepted be part of that charade?

Posted by: Chichita | April 19, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

When did national politics turn into School Council President? Vote for that Barry, he’s so cool–SPARE ME> it is quite appalling to know that a man who can’t manage to prepare to a nationally televised debate could seriously be elected. Wait, that’s happened at least twice in recent history hasn’t it. STOP THE MADNESS, PLEASE. The world doesn’t need the democratic party’s version of Dubya!!!

Posted by: struck_off | April 19, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Where were the questions about Afghanistan, the war on “terror,” presidential signing statements, the US Supreme Court, the deplorable state of child healthcare in this country, the deplorable state of education in this country, the prospect of never-ending war, the possibility of a draft, reckless government spending, the imperial presidency, torture, the “Pottery Barn Rule,” waging war with government contractors, lobbyists, what kind of government oversight do we need on mortgage companies, mining companies, environmental companies … I have absolutely no doubt that these two brilliant people — Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama — had answers to all of these extremely important issues, but were never given the chance to speak. Oh well, at least we have the flag pin issue resolved.

Posted by: viewer9998 | April 19, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

It is so confusing for me as to how Obama is so fluent in giving therapeutic speeches to attract people to make believe on him that he will actually bring huge changes in America despite the fact there are no evidence to prove that he has done so (even in small scale)while he was a member of Illinois legislature for eight years. At the same time, such a powerful speaker like him acted like an inexperience young man struggling to find a few words especially when he had to respond to a moderately difficult questions during the last debate. I think he should be grateful to ABC for giving him an advance warning/training as to what he should expect while dealing with McCain during the GE instead of being vinditive by showing his middle finger.

Posted by: Herm | April 19, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

I think it is time America starts learning about just who Obama is. As I have seen over and over, people just don’t know much about him (people know much more about some of hte people who have endorsed him, such as Oprah).
Obama says that it took 45 minutes to get to anything the American public cares about in the debate the other night. Of course he would say that, because we finally are getting to questions about who he really is. You can learn a lot about a person by looking at the people he (or she) associates with. I am not sure America needs to put a person in the white house whose spiritual leader is very open about his hatred of whites and the oppression posed on blacks by whites. I most certainly agree that whites have oppressed blacks over the years, but the hatred with which the man rants is scary at least. At least Oprah had enough sense to distance herself from this man, but on the other hand, Obama put the man in an important position in his campaign. Is this what we want in the White House.
Or what about his association with an unrepentant US terrorist, William Ayers, a former leader of the Weather Underground. It would be one thing if Ayers was regretted what he had done, but he has made it quite clear there is no regret in his actions or the actions of the Weather Underground. With the troubles this country faces with terrorism, do we really want a man in the white house who associates with well-known US terrorists? Let’s just put out the welcome mat right now for Osama — after all, I am sure he is a reasonable man who can be reasoned with — GET A CLUE.
With regard to Hillary, well we already knew the Clintons were liars. So her recent embellishments are nothing new. However, I hope we find out more about Obama in the near future, so America can find out that he is indeed not Mr. Wonderful.
Here’s to hoping enough Americans come to their senses (and are willing to open their eyes to the candidate out there that you can trust, whose service to his country is undeniable, and who is truly the best candidate in this election, regardless of part affiliation — John McCain — the only true moderate in this campaign).

Posted by: Jim | April 19, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

voters can use their 1st amendment right, freedom of speech, and choose not to vote in november if obama is the nominee.

Posted by: ramona | April 19, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

ramona, I just might. I’m not thrilled with any of the three remaining candidates. I chose not to vote for president in 2004. Wish we had a “none of the above” choice; perhaps that would send a message to both parties, though I doubt it.

Posted by: LagunaTriMom | April 19, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Obama has a glass jaw,the GOP will DESTROY HIM!!

Posted by: danny | April 19, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Obama didn’t give anyone the finger. He was scratching his cheek. Please, get a grip people!

Posted by: dee | April 19, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Lets all try to understand just one thing. Obama cannot win the general election with just half of the democratic voters, so keep spewing your divisiveness. He has done a very poor job of selling his brand of politics, hence Hillary is still in the race. The Obamanites with their flamming rehtoric and smugness will ensure another GOP victory in nov.

Posted by: Tim | April 19, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

I have been a Democrat all my life and voted in every election since 1952. But there is no way on the face of this earth I will or would ever vote for Osama Obama. Put him on ticket and McCain, gets my vote hands down..He is a lying, coniving, Chicago thug who will say any thing to get elected. He makes Al Capone, look like a girl scout.

Posted by: Pat M | April 19, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Obama will say anything to get you vote right now.
The ABC debate was the first time anyone put his no cred no experience ass on the spot and he can not handle it. I want to know who he is not what he thinks before we put him in office.
WHAT PERSON RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT EVER DID WHAT THEY SAID WHEN THEY RAN ONCE IN OFFICE YOU IDIOTS.
Obama people are self help freaks who place all their “hope” outside themselves, Obama has marketed to you and you think it is genuine, it is insulting and a disgrace to americans who can not see the liberal propoganda. I would never as a black man vote for Barack Obama and the pressure to vote for him just because I am black is also a disgrace.
If he gets the nom I am voting for McCain because once again the dems pick someone who is unelectable. Gore, Kerry, Obama. Well Done

Posted by: todde | April 20, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Obama will definately say anything to get your vote right now.
He will say anything for a vote and YOU PEOPLE BELIEVE HIM??????
I agree with todde the post above 100%%%%%

Posted by: rickstanton | April 20, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I read an article that stated even Jesus could not win the election for president in the U.S.! While the media is busy scrutinizing the 3 candidates, why have they not paid attention to and reported on the things that have gotten this country in so much trouble?

Posted by: dv thomas | April 20, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

I have been a huge Obama supporter, and it is very easy to get upset about people trouncing on him or giving him a hard time about things that appear to not be “real issues.” Like most Americans, I am not happy about they way things are going right now. We, my husband and I, have a son in Iraq right now. A Marine. So we have a real personal investment in decisions made about Iraq. Believe me, we are always short of breath when watching any news related to Iraq and the upcoming election. The things that have come to light lately about Obama, taken one at a time, appear to be nothing. Collectively, that is another story. A symbol of hope and change? Or do these things show that, collectively, we have just another politician? It is something that everyone should consider. These last several weeks have shown me that it is time that I need to get hold of this overwhelming enthrallment with Obama, and begin to think like a intelligent citizen and watch with a more critical eye. This election is too important to just be enthralled with anyone because they seem different. No one is going to be a messiah. No one is going to make everything just right. It is not possible, there are too many things and too many people to believe. But we do need is someone that will actually critically think forward and make responsible and intelligent decisions. I do care about what ABC covered in the debate. It is all important. A president who will create further division among our citizens based on race or any other matter is going to be just as destructive to our country as a president who runs a bad war.

Posted by: JennieMac | April 20, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

If Hillary won the nomination- 1/2 the democrats would not vote for her in the general election and certainly no republicans will vote for her. why would you vote for somebody so cruel and negative. Lets end this Clinton and Bush power hunger- and get somebody in there that embodies HOPE and CHANGE for divisive politics.
I want Uniting. Barack can do that, unless people believe the nonsense coming out of the Clinton campaign.

Posted by: xforce | April 21, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

I’m a Canadian who for the first time has been very interested in the US Political scene with two such first timers for the States – 1 a woman; and 2 a man of color. However, this ABC Debate was a disgrace. I could not believe that it was televised and that the questions did not seem to have been vetted before by the ‘higherups’. And George came off very ‘pro-Clinton’ and I don’t even know that it was fair that he was on the panel. Where were the issues that America needed to hear and talk about? Was this a debate or was it more of an Enquirer type news forum? That was more in the vein of an Entertainment tonight forum which does their job beautifully .. but the job that I thought ABC was to do that night dissapointed me greatly.

Posted by: Shel' | April 21, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

To the folks who said Obama didn’t answer the so called “tough questions” during the PA debate (if you can call it that), I ask them where have they been in the past 2 months? Obama has not only answered the questions but he’s done so over and over and over again. It’s like a broken record now. I think the media should ask the question once maybe twice then publicize it so that whoever wants to know about it can read it but they should not waste people’s time asking the same questions or replaying the same tape as if the answer is going to change. It can’t be too hard to answer questions you’ve already answered a gazillion times before. How dumb is that? Face it, George and Charles did an atrocious job at the debate and should not be allowed to moderate any more debates–EVER. In fact, they should quit ABC and go to Fox News where they’d fit right in with the rest of second-rate journalists they have there. Shame on you ABC for allowing George and Charles make you look bad. Shame on Hillary for jumping on the bandwagon to win points when she knew Obama was right to say what he said. Obama didn’t jump all over her and exploit the fact that she was whining during a debate because the moderators were asking her all the questions first. He took the high road and let it go. In this case, Obama was legit to say what he said. It was both to Hillary’s benefit as well as his own to say that George and Charles were not asking important questions about issues that the PA people really wanted to hear their viewpoints on. Instead of using good judgement and agreeing that the moderator’s should stick to the issues, she chose to make an issue of it to win points. Just goes to show you Hillary doesn’t care if her opponent is making sense as long as she can make herself look good by making the other person look bad. Hillary is sad and pitiful. And Bill is just plain ole sad.

Posted by: spkgmymind | April 21, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.