Obama Disputes Clinton’s Popular Vote Count
ABC News’ Sunlen Miller, David Wright & Andy Fies Report: Barack Obama says it’s an "abstract measure" to count votes in Michigan and Florida, whose contests were essentially nulled by the Democratic National Committee when the states violated party rules and moved their primaries ahead of others in the election calendar.
"There have been a number of different formulations that the Clinton campaign has been trying to arrive at to suggest that somehow they’re not behind," Obama told reporters following a town hall meeting in New Albany, Indiana, "If you want to count them for some abstract measure, you’re free to do so. But, you know, the way that the popular vote is translated is into delegates, that’s how these primaries and these caucuses work."
Watch the VIDEO HERE.
The debate is more than an academic one for the candidates and Democratic superdelegates who may decide the tightly contested nomination.
If votes in Florida and Michigan count toward the national popular vote total, Clinton currently leads Obama by over 100,000 votes; if those states do not count, Obama leads Clinton by several hundred thousand.
Adding another point of contention: Obama’s name did not appear on the Michigan ballot but both candidates did appear on ballots in the Florida contest.
For the latest delegate and vote count, visit the Politics page of ABCNews.com
Obama said on Wednesday, the day after a double digit defeat in the Pennsylvania primary, said he would leave it to reporters to "sort thought the various permutations of what should count and what shouldn’t that the Clinton camp is presenting."
Not surprisingly, Sen. Clinton is advocating for inclusion of the Florida and Michigan counts, a position she made clear in an interview on Wednesday’s "Good Morning America".
"The votes in Michigan and Florida were official," Clinton told ABC News’ Diane Sawyer, "I mean, they were certified by the secretary of state. It’s just that the Democratic Party can’t figure out what to do with all those votes, and try to seat delegates."
"I actually have more votes from people who actually voted for me," Clinton added. "Last night’s win should give a lot of fresh information to our superdelegates, because after all, the road to Pennsylvania Avenue does lead through Pennsylvania."
At his earlier event in Indiana, Obama responded to a question on superdelegates saying, "I do think that these elections that we’ve been doing should be counted for something, and if we’ve won the most delegates from the voters, seems to me that it might be a good idea to make me the nominee."
Obama also took a moment to analyze his Pennslyvania loss for the press.
"If you look at the numbers, in fact, the problem has less to do with white working class voters, in fact the problem is, that to the extent there is a problem, is that older voters are very loyal to Senator Clinton. And I think part of that is they’ve got a track record of voting for not just Senator Clinton but also her husband," Obama said.
The junior Senator from Illinois also complained about his rival’s approach to their nomination fight.
"Nobody has complained more about the press, about questions at debates, about being mistreated than Senator Clinton has or President Clinton," the candidate said, quickly adding, "I’ve always believed that if you’re tough you don’t have to talk about it."
Tuesday’s loss marks the third time in recent months Obama has had an opportunity to put sizeable distance between he and his rival, with opportunities to all but end the nomination contest in Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania.
When asked by reporters why he can’t seem to close the deal with voters, Obama replied, "The way we’re gonna close the deal is by winning, and right now we’re winning . . . I think it’s apparent that we’re in the strongest position to win in November."
Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
Abstract Measure? Will those democrats be Abstract to you in November, there, Barak. After all, the took the time to stand in line and vote. Almost 3 million of them.. ready to throw them under the bus with Grandma for a win?
Change we can believe in.
Posted by: A reader in georgia | April 23, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Great answers, great leadership and vision for America. Thank you Obama. Hill the Bosnian General is seeing snipers again all over the place and would like to legitimize the illegal. Nobody will take the nomination from the winner Obama to the loser Hillary. She can run but she cannot hide. She will bring the democratic party down because she is unelectable and knows that reality. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 23, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
The only decision that was made regarding Michigan and Florida was that the delegates would not be seated. The popular vote still counts. In Florida, only Obama campaigned by airing television commercials for three weeks. In Michigan, Obama and Edwards decided to take their names off the ballot. The point is that the delegate issue still has to be resolved, but the popular votes must be counted in the totals. Obama did not want a re-vote in Michigan and Florida, and worked against it. Certainly Obama cannot want to disenfranchise the voters in Florida and Michigan, since these states are needed to win the General Election.
Posted by: svsolis | April 23, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Lovely — two narcissists in a brawl, with their enablers clashing on line and in the media. This is AWESOME!
PS: isnt clinton just baiting him on the FL/Mich thing? Everytime she claims it, he dismisses the votes- which will just agitate Dems in those states who supported her overwhelmingly. LOL. He keeps falling for every trap these days. I guess he got too confident hearing all of the “Yes We Can” chanters.
Posted by: tony | April 23, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Obama said on Wednesday, the day after a double digit defeat in the Pennsylvania primary, said he would leave it to reporters to “sort thought the various permutations of what should count and what shouldn’t that the Clinton camp is presenting.”
That’s very brave of you Obama. Of course, only the votes in Your Favor should count, the ones for Hillary should be thrown under the bus with grandma.
Did Obama commit to another debate while he was at it? No? Wimp.
GO HILLARY 08!
Posted by: calli | April 23, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
She won by only 9.34% and virtually every expert I heard quoted said she needed 10% or better to be viable. Everybody is reporting 10% but it is not there with rounding. What gives!
Posted by: Wellican Uzacalculator | April 23, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
He’s such a hypocritical jerk. He wants the superdelegates to go to person who is winning the popular vote, but even though Hillary won the popular vote in Texas and Nevada he’s okay with getting more delegates there because of the screwy way the distributed them. Florida is not an abstract state, it is the state that has decided the presidential election twice. But he’s content to tell those voters their votes don’t count now. He’s a self-absorbed, arrogant jerk. I’m so sick of hearing that somehow Hillary’s the bad guy because she won’t give up. He cannot win the big states, he cannot win the swing states and despite having 3 times has much money as she does, he still got his rear kicked last night. He cannot win the general election.
Posted by: Wendy | April 23, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
If the democrats don’t count Florida and Michigan votes, the REPUBLICANS will in the general election!!!
Posted by: Isabel | April 23, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Go home Hillary the Bosnian General, go, the pocket is empty, Penn has to be paid but the Colombian government cannot give you more money for your campaign nor can the Saudis and people from Dubai and the Emirats. People who you want to protect against Iran without their request to do so. Feramonger and warmonger Hill, good luck in the senate. God bless America and God bless obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 23, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
I’d like to thank Senator Clinton for handing the White House over to Senator McCain. Way to go…
Posted by: jmengate | April 23, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
FACT: Mr Obama worked his yung adult life AND his early years asa civil rights DEFENDER. He worked tirelesly to register voters in Illinois to back Then candidate Bill Clinotn.Mr.Obama’s RECORD is one of DEFENSEin the protection of VOTERS RIGHTS. YET…FACT: MR Obama WAS on the Michigan ballot and REMOVED is name;not anyone’s fault but his own!! ANDhe REFUSES to allow the votes of AMERICNS IN MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA; as if these AMERICANS don’t even exist. AMERICANS… DEMAND that ALL poplar votes be counted. Do NOT support OBAMA’s disenfranchisement of AMERICANS’VOICES and their votes..
Posted by: DaneNM | April 23, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
The US deserves Hillary Clinton for their President. I’m serious. We hate the facts. We hate the truth. We love to be part of the mob and beat down on those damn free thinkers. We are a nation of bullies who love to pile on the new guy and then laugh about it later while convincing ourselves that they deserved it. We’d prefer to be told what to do and what to think than decide for ourselves. Even when we are shown the lie, we will still accept it. We are her people. Obama thinks too highly of us.
Is there any doubt AT ALL in anyone’s mind that Hillary and/or Bill Clinton will lie at any opportunity if they believe it will serve them better than the truth? Be it over sexual relations with ‘that’ woman. I supported NAFTA while I was against it, or was it that she was against NAFTA while she supported it? Bringing peace to Northern Ireland and Bosnia. Sniper fire. Taxes. White House experience, 3 a.m. calls. I heard the recording of Bill Clinton saying that the Obama Campaign played the race card, and hours later he denied saying it at all. That has been a running theme in this campaign. Lay out an accusation to the press of active wrongdoing on the part of the Obama campaign, no proof, mind you, only an accusation and then pretend you said no such thing when confronted with the fact that the accusation is unfounded.
The press is complicit. the bigger the whopper, the more coverage it will get. Was the Rev. Wright thing, or the bitter comments, really that much of a story or did they become the big story because everyone felt a need to tear down the new guy. The fact the Hillary Clinton lied, or misspoke about her trip to Bosnia did not get half the coverage of Wright. The fact that she said quite clearly that she would commit US troops to any Mid-East conflict and directly threatened Iran (who according to the NIE has no viable nuke program, the NIE was right about Iraq, I see no reason to doubt them here). No press, no massive outcry of war hawkishness, foreign policy naiveté, no pre-emptive rush to war, again.
Hillary Clinton has lied to us, hidden things from us, misled us on her policies and positions. Has all but ceased presenting the merits of her case to be the President in favor of attacking her opponent to make you vote against him rather than for her. She knows what we are; scared monkeys that wait for the crack of the whip to know which way to jump instead of selecting a path for ourselves that will lead away from that torture all together.
Hillary Clinton says she is only doing what the Republicans were going to do against Obama anyway. If that is the case, what makes her different from any other Republican? what makes her different from George Bush for that matter? Her plans for social security is the same as his, form a committee and wait. Attacking Iran is on her agenda, the same as his. She will listen to the Generals on the ground in Iraq to decide what to do, just as he does. She has made impossible promises during the campaign that the office of the President cannot deliver on. When they evaporate and she is branded a liar, she will say she only misspoke, or that it is ‘their’ fault, or she will simply gloss over it and present a new shiny thing to get our attention. HRC is the secret Republican candidate. Obama is the only candidate left in the race that does not have a Republican agenda and does not use republican tactics. Pointing and blaming to win at politics has been successful for a long time.
I’ll say it again. We are a nation of bullies and thugs. We will follow the person who is picking on the other guy, because we don’t want them picking on us. As a mob we will accept lies for truth if we hear it loud and long enough, even when the facts are held up to us brightly.
Here are some examples of some truths that people don’t care about and find it more acceptable to believe the lie:
Obama is and has not been a Muslim, in faith or practice. – There has never been anything other than innuendo to suggest otherwise. He was not sworn in on the Koran.
Obama loves America. – Not just because he says it, but because for over 20 years he has worked avidly on the behalf of his fellow citizens. If you believe that the end all be all of patriotism is encompassed by a lapel pin, that is exactly what the rising socialist party in Germany believed in the 30′s when they required their members to wear their pins to prove loyalty.
Obama is not an elitist. – He grew up with divorced parents without any great wealth. Went to school on scholarship and student loans. Did not have significant financial success until after publishing a book. Still the least wealthy candidate in the race. That said being elite is a good thing, he is well educated, articulate, and intelligent, with high levels of compassion and empathy and has a highly organized and tactical mind. We should want someone who is the best of the best, or elite, to be the President. Of the three remaining candidates, I would say that Obama has the most and most recent experience actually working on the front lines for the people in this country.
Not everyone Obama ever knew or met tells him what to think, or will somehow have influence over him as President. – We all know people that we have significant differences with, some we work with, some we associate with, some we know in passing. Rarely could any of them dictate to us what we think and believe. Certainly even fewer than that would be able to tell us how we do our jobs. No other candidate is being held to that standard.
Obama has not been vetted – Please find me another candidate that has had his patriotism questioned so openly and baldly. Show me another candidate who has had investigations into his life and his writings played across the press going back to his days in kindergarten. Find me another candidate that had so little to be found in his own life to attack that the Republican opposition, including Hillary Clinton has had to resort to not only making things up out of whole cloth but also attacking anyone he knew for longer than 10 minutes for something they may have said or done, sometimes prior to ever having met the candidate.
The Republicans and HRC are counting on people to not think. To be afraid, to not trust what is different. To listen more to a 30 second commercial that not so subtly and completely falsely tries to connect her opponent to a terrorist. Obama thinks that you are better than that, that you will read the positions and policies and make a decision on what is best for the country.
I know better. HRC and the Republicans want to incite a lynch mob and are doing a good job with it. Like that lynch mob you will surely feel guilty tomorrow, maybe even a little ashamed for being so easily led, but you are marching along today, chest puffed out and holding your heads high.
If you believe the polls, over half the registered democrats believe her to be untrustworthy, nearly 60% in the last poll. A blip on the news, Obama’s bowling score got more coverage. yet she continues to be competitive. Why? Because Americans know they can trust a lying politician to lie and can accept that but a truthful politician cannot be withstood. Someone who calls us to be our better selves must be defeated, because to be our better selves would force us to face that we have been less than we should have been, and we can’t have that.
Hillary Clinton has been clear that she is willing to win at any cost. While we may want to admire that sentiment, take a moment to think about it. She is willing to sacrifice anything and everything to win. The reason this sounds familiar is because it is the same philosophy the current administration has of its agenda.
You’ll probably win HRC. You will do whatever is necessary to do so, and your opponent will continue to appeal to our better angles in the false belief that they are there to hear him. Americans do not want the audacity of hope. They do not want responsibility, they do not want truth. It is easier to mumble “No we can’t” than the other thing. We crave the juicy gossip, the innuendo, and the boldest of lies, the cheap shot, it is just more entertaining. Hillary likes to keep us beating up on the new guy, because she feels she has already gotten her lumps. In the face of not having anything to beat him up on, she can make stuff up, we don’t care. we just prefer to beat someone down than lift, even ourselves, up.
Obama, America doesn’t want hope. They want grist for the mill. Call Hillary Clinton the alternate Republican candidate. Tell them if it walks, talks and campaigns like a Republican…Flat our call her a racist for associating with racists. Say she is an elitist of the first order that hasn’t done an honest day’s hard work in her adult life. Call her a warmonger who does not truly regret or apologize for her vote to go to war and eagerly awaits the chance to bomb Iran. That she has pimped her daughter and ridden the coattails of her philandering husband to win an election. Call her a liar to her face at the next debate.
By going so negative, the press will brand you a liar on you mission of change, THEN American will trust you.
Posted by: Louis | April 23, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
IF Obama were truly for all people he would let the votes and delegates count. Just goes to show he talks out of both sides of his mouth. So much for that Hope and Change BS. In the end I am sure the DNC will make sure that both votes and delegates count. Unless they are really that stupid.
Posted by: J | April 23, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Instead of the media just looking at Obama’s ability to capture the white working class voter, the media should also focus on a Hillary question: How the HECK is Hillary going to capture the African-American vote if she indeed wins this nomination?
The reality is that she is NOT and therefore she is NOT going to win the General Election because she will turn off the African-American vote.
The BASE of the Democratic party is NOT the white working class voters as the media spin is right now but the African-American voter.
Without overwhelming African-American vote in the Fall in huge numbers NO Dem nominee will win the general election. As a result, I think that Hillary has made herself unelectable.
Posted by: stacey | April 23, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Riiight!!!!!!!
Sure obama, start “questioning” the Hillary Clinton campaign – AGAIN!
When you are challenged that’s all you can do, spew out the meaningless words. How about another magnificent speech right about now? You know, just like the one on race that you so magnificently gave? That speech (words again – no substance) put you back in the race for president?
Wrong!
Your true self came out in the debate with Clinton where she stomped you into the dirt. Hillary Clinton wiped that smirk off your face – at last!
Go Hillary
Drop out now obama – you’ve done enough damage to the Democratic party and in playing the race card to divide this nation. Get out and go away.
Hope and Change? Worthless, un-backable words – words, words, words, no action.
There is no “beef” to you obama – just empty words.
Go make some more kool aid for your cult followers so they can start spewing more hate for Clinton on these blogs.
Posted by: Lou | April 23, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
The Democrats need to take a serious look at their primary rules when this thing is over. Punishing two states by stripping them of all their delegates and giving a bunch of party insiders the power to overrule the voice of the people is beyond stupid. And it has nothing to do with democracy.
It is time the Democrats start living up to their name.
Posted by: El Pajaro | April 23, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Wendy….good post.
Posted by: barb | April 23, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Obama just lost FL and MI for good.
Posted by: Demhypocrisy | April 23, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
is anyone as sick of this as i am. i’m not voting for mccain. that’s all i care about. Who it is, i don’t care. End it.
Posted by: jessboston | April 23, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
I would have been more impressed if Hillary had stood up for all the voters when these states defied the party and the major candidates to hold early elections. Just like her decision to give Bush a blank check to war, Hillary plays politics not principals only to see that the latter will count down the stretch.
Posted by: sdk | April 23, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
She won PA by 8.6% at the last count which certainly is not double digits (over 10%).
Clinton seems to have serious math problems.
Perhaps she is too busy planning the nuking of Iran to bother with such trivia.
As if the Middle Easterners don’t have enough problems (that includes Israel), they have a deranged future President who will leave them with a nuclear winter.
Posted by: susants | April 23, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
That’s right — keep it up, Obama and Obamaniacs. The notion of counting every voter is abstract.
Just like you have not won anything for a solid two months now.
Posted by: commonsensenj | April 23, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Is it any wonder that Hillary would, once again, stretch the truth?
She truly is a “congenital liar” ….
Posted by: TX | April 23, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
The DNC stripped MI and FL of their delegates. There is nothing dishonest to say that X amount of people voted for a specific candidate, especially where the votes have been state certified. The votes are votes cast. So, it is technically true more votes have been cast for Clinton. That doesn’t mean that they have the same weight from a delegate standpoint.
Posted by: LOM | April 23, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
commonsensenj – Obama has won several contests in the last two months. What are you talking about?
Posted by: jock59801 | April 23, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Are you Hillary supporters serious? Everyone keeps talking about how Barack can’t seal the deal…Ummm, why is nobody asking why Hillary, can not pass Odama in delegates? Why can’t she even get in a position to seal the deal? She isn’t even arguing that she can beat Barack, cause she knows she can’t. She just is saying he can’t win, but she can? Please, save us all the time and annoyance and just drop out Mrs. Bill Clinton
Posted by: SecOfState | April 23, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
GREAT ANSWER OBAMA. HILLARY IS UNELECTABLE AND CA NOT WIN THIS NIMINATION.
O OBAMA ’08.
Posted by: I.A.T.SMITH | April 23, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
If we do the arithmetic to a few more decimal places we get that Clinton got 9.3229% more votes than Obama.
She didnt win by double digits as her friends in the media spin it for her.
Do the math 6th graders. 9.3 never ever rounds up to 10. She won by 9%.
In her home state, with the mayors machines of Philly and Pittsburgh and the Governor all working for her, she couldnt come up to the required double digit win. She is behind by so many actual delegates that she is trying to spin that votes in states whose elections failed to follow party rules and which no one else campaigned, should count to show how strong she is. Utter nonsense.
This is Bill, asking what we mean by IS. We mean how many delegates did you win, by WIN.
And she lost Texas Bill. 99-94 in delegate count, the only measure that will win anyone the nomination. So really, she is done. All in good time, it shall be revealed even to the 4th graders who wanted you to think she had the coveted 10 pt win, which she failed to accomplish, after all is said and done. Yet another spin and failure for her.
Posted by: bruce becker | April 23, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
GREAT ANSWER OBAMA. HILLARY IS UNELECTABLE AND CA NOT WIN THIS NIMINATION.
GO OBAMA ’08.
Posted by: I.A.T.SMITH | April 23, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
The reason clinton wants to count the votes in FL and MI, she wants Obama to be confused and make a big mistake. This is getting old it’s all reruns and broken records same old stuff.
Obama’s state wins 30 lost 15, Delegate count 1715 +/-, Negatives are way down, Better nominee
Clinton’s state wins 15 lost 30, Delegate count 1585 +/-, Negatives way up. Not a good nominee.
Fund Raising Obama beats Clinton or McCain Expediently.
Registering new voters Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Bring the country together Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Overall, Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Race against McCain, Obama better nominee.
Ending the War in Iraq, Obama will, Hillary or McCain wont.
Obama all the way!
Posted by: Lookup | April 23, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
please hllary just let it go
in no way you can win the nomination
Posted by: SAM | April 23, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Oh so the FL and MI votes are now abstract measures, so what is Obama saying he does not need them??
Fine with me well lets see you win an election without them them.
Posted by: SJ | April 23, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Actually, they shouldn’t count – neither candidate campaigned in those states and Obama was not even on the ballot in MI. In FL people were voting to lower property taxes – there was a record turn out and it was for that, NOT for Hillary. The election was so early that without the campaigning, none of us knew anything about Obama to vote for him.
I’m sure it would be a much different outcome if the election were held today in those two states….. except in S Florida where those idiot old Dems don’t know HOW to vote for the candidate they want.
Posted by: Michelle | April 23, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Sen. Obama is absolutely correct.
Posted by: Dinero80 | April 23, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
It’s amazing how everyone wants to focus on the popular vote and who has it. The DNC rules say the person with the most delegates wins… period. It also says Michigan and Florida delegates do not count… period. If Hillary tries to BREAK THE RULES, then I guess she wants McCain to win in November !
Posted by: Dave Stir, TX | April 23, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Obama’s state wins 30 lost 15, Delegate count 1715 +/-, Negatives are way down, Better nominee (The ones that matter he lost)
Clinton’s state wins 15 lost 30, Delegate count 1685 +/-, Negatives way up. Not a good nominee. (Won the states where the majority of people live and work hard and represent the true working class dems)
Fund Raising Obama beats Clinton or McCain Expediently. (Goerge Bush did too, bought and paid for)
Registering new voters Obama beats Clinton or McCain. (Repubs and Indep switching sides b/c they know she is the true threat, they will all vote for McCain in the Gen)
Bring the country together Obama beats Clinton or McCain.(What has he brought together? Elite Dems making over $150K and blacks? Both the loudest groups in a caucus)
Overall, Obama beats Clinton or McCain. (How do you figure?)
Race against McCain, Obama better nominee. (How do you figure?)
Ending the War in Iraq, Obama will, Hillary or McCain wont. (He doesn’t even have a plan…he was called out on that)
Posted by: Demhypocrisy | April 23, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
The people of FL and MI did not go out to vote it was just a figment of our imagination, a make believe vote so no need to count these invisible votes, they are not important, you cant claim something that you cant see, they were not counted and they were never registered as votes.
Man this piece of work the call Obama, it will give me the greatest pleasure is voting against him in any GE.
Posted by: SJ | April 23, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Lies? Does anybody really believe Barack went to church for 20 years, donated tens and tens of thousands and was unaware of the pastor’s sermons?
Who knows. Maybe he has a busted ear drum.
Posted by: liveoak | April 23, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
By Hillary saying that the Florida and Michigan delegates and votes should count, she is actually helping the party, not hurting it. There are obviously very angry people right now in Michigan and Florida who feel that their votes should count and by dismissing them like Obama has, it only makes them less likely to vote at all or vote for the Democratic nominee when it really counts. Obama knows that if Florida and Michigan counted, he would be losing in popular vote, delegate vote and he would be the loser. Both of their names were on the ballot in Florida- count it. Obama ran ads in the state and now that it turns out that he lost he is using it as an excuse to dismiss them. Talk about unifying the party- if Obama would count all of the people and all of the votes and states, then maybe there really could be a unified party. Nice try Obama but once again you show how much of a double-standard your campaign is.
Posted by: A | April 23, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
For Wellican
The 10% figure was based on a turnout of 2 million voters and thereby a win of 200,000+ votes.
Since 2.3 million voted, Hillary did not need 10% to reach that threshold. As it turned out she won by about 214,000 votes and so she exceeded the goal.
Posted by: Democrat | April 23, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
The popular vote doesn’t really mean anything, but up until recently, that’s all Obama kept blathering about. Now that Clinton is rightfully making a point that technically factoring in the votes she got in both the MI and FL primaries actually puts her over Obama’s touted popular vote myth, he’s throwing a hissy-fit. And, he and he alone opted to have his name removed from the ballots. And, Clinton never campaigned in either MI or FL, contrary to the fabrications and lies the Obama camp are trying to present. Obama is ticked off that a girl is giving him a royal political run for something he’s totally inexperienced and unqualified for. Even if Obama wins any remaining states, he still won’t have enough delegates. The so-called super-delegates will have to decide. And, like it or not, the president is always elected by the electoral college vote and not the popular vote and the larger states that Clinton has won are in fact what is relevant. Obama has failed to win any of the meaty states, except for IL. I hope Obama ratchets up the negative, because Clinton won’t put up with this and will throw it right back at him, which is another reason why Obama is afraid of any more debates.
Posted by: Terry | April 23, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Obama people: Take a deep breath and see if you can follow this math.
I just heard your guy say he had been down 20 points when he unleashed 11 million dollars to try to pull out a win (Now, in fairness he didn’t bring up the $ 11 million but he did cite the 20 points).
So, last night he reduces that to 10 points or 107,583 votes. By my calculations – forgive me, I’m just one of those ‘uneducated’ Hillary supporters, but that means that he spent $ 102.00 PER VOTE to reduce that margin – but he still lost by 10 %. LOSER!!!!
Posted by: s. valenti | April 23, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
the american people deserve better than bush-clinton-bush-clinton like they are the only smart familly in the country.
by the way was she a first lady or a cabinet member?
Posted by: SAM | April 23, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
I wonder if those big contributors start to worry if he can not win.
Especially they already up to max 80%.
Posted by: crisis08 | April 23, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
More Math:
I’m not a statistician (and I’ll provide my assumptions later) but what do you make of these numbers? Obama spent a WHOPPING $ 1.6 million PER DELEGATE GAINED in the Pa. race.
YIKES. seems like he’s got money to burn.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 23, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
The popular vote doesn’t count for anything officially in this process, so it is hardly worth arguing over the subtleties. It only counts for “making the case” to the superdelegates, and for that each one of the superdelegates can add things up whatever way they think is appropriate to help them make their decision. And none of that changes the basic dynamics of the race which remains that 1) it is very close, and 2) Obama is slightly ahead.
Posted by: jock59801 | April 23, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Yes, Hillary leads in the popular vote
Yes, Hillary beat Obama by 12.3%
Yes, true Democrats vote for Hillary
Yes, Obama lost union, catholic, male, female, senior vote
No He Can’t
Nader/Obama 08
Posted by: Martin | April 23, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Terry — Your comments are spot on and completely logical. Good luck with that here though! :)
Posted by: LOM | April 23, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Math Assumptions:
215,166 vote differential between HRC and BO(represents 10% margin); 107,583 votes is 50 % of that differential. $ 11 million spent by BO (YIKES); delegates awarded 81 vs. 69 (conservatively 15,554 voters/delegate; used the 107,583 voters to yield 6.7 delegates to represent BO’s GAIN.
Someone more savvy than I could probably do a more sophisticated job – but $ 1.6 million PER DELEGATE GAINED – UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!
Posted by: s. valenti | April 23, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
s. valenti – What’s wrong with him having money? We gave it to him to spend, so why shouldn’t he? The fact that he is the better fundraiser us hardly an argument AGAINST him.
Posted by: jock59801 | April 23, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
How does Obama want the votes to count when he has refused to do so, he has refused all effort to have a re-vote, and not talking this crap about its a abstract measure.
People in FL just did not go out to vote for a property tax and then just said oh look there are also names on this ballot so let me vote, they are not dumb they all knew very well they were also voting in a primary.
Posted by: SJ | April 23, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Bottom line: the voters in Florida and Michigan will be voting in November, and not likely vote for a candidate that continues to discount their votes. To ignore Florida and Michigan votes when considering the best nominee is foolish at best, and lethal to the Democratic Party!
Hillary ’08 … in it to win!
Posted by: Jesus Francisco Cardenas | April 23, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Everybody should feel real sorry for Michelle after the way this country has treated her.
Let’s see. She wants to move out of a 2 million dollar home and move in the white house but the country ain’t saying it’s “your equal turn” like they did at Princeton. Just move out and let her have it. Just give it to her.
Posted by: liveoak | April 23, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
PLEASE SAY THE WHOLE TRUTH, THE NAME OF OBAMA WAS NOT IN THE MICHIGAN BULLET BECAUSE HE AND EDWARD SIGNED AN AFFIDAVIT TO REMOVE THEIR NAMES. OBAMA IS ANTI MICHIGAN, SINCE HILLARY IS THE FAVORITE AND SHE WON.
Posted by: Nil | April 23, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
This is America.
How can you exclude MILLIONS of voters to select the president.
Hillary is winning.
Hilary 08!!
Posted by: jt | April 23, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
From sea to shinning sea, much of Obama’s lead in the popular vote comes out of one county. Take a wild guess which one.
Cook County, Illinois.
Talk about ABSRACT!!!
Posted by: Dad of 5 G's | April 23, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Yeah, Sam, all that peace and prosperity of the Clinton years were a drag. We really need a change from that, so I agree with you about Obama; why don’t we try to elect an inexperienced, deceptive, ruthless racist for President. I’m sure he can do much better than the Clinton years.
Posted by: Fred | April 23, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
The pledged delegates and “votes” from Florida and Michigan have nothing to do with this nomination.
Posted by: Greg | April 23, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Sounds like Bush and the 2000 election year. We’re going to lose based on a technicality. What the super delegates should look at is the fact that of the people who actually came out and voted, Hillary is ahead in the popular vote. The fact that the DNC and Obama are disenfranchising their own party is incredulous.
Posted by: sarmprtpm | April 23, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
I, too, am not sure why ABC and others show a 10% victory, or why their figures are different from the PA state figures.
There’s no doubt that Hillabeans is trying to make what she can of this, but it was not the 15% win she really needed to be taken seriously.
Unfortunately, it’s too tempting for the MSM to keep this going, so in spite of all the prognosications, they are acting as if Hillabeans is not demented when she squawks of her huge victory and lead in the popular vote.
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 23, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
What you guys do not know is that clinton and his campaign are using your money to get rich. do not beleive me?
Check how much she paid her associate compare to how much barack paid his.
and at the end he still winning
Posted by: SAM | April 23, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
As a American one of my right is the freedom to vote, and no one is going to take that away from me.
For Obama and his supporters to try and do so is totally wrong and he cannot run this country, if he is going to start to interfere with people rights.
My vote has to be counted weather he like it or not.
Posted by: SJ | April 23, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
The reason clinton wants to count the votes in FL and MI, she wants Obama to be confused and make a big mistake. This is getting old it’s all reruns and broken records same old stuff.
Demhypocrisy: Obama’s state wins 30 lost 15, Delegate count 1715 +/-, Negatives are way down, Better nominee
Clinton’s state wins 15 lost 30, Delegate count 1585 +/-, Negatives way up. Not a good nominee.
Fund Raising Obama beats Clinton or McCain Expediently. Answer, Obama $250m, Clinton $150m, McCain $50m
Registering new voters Obama beats Clinton or McCain. Answer, More people have voted in the history of voting because of Obama being in the race without that hum drum race no excitement.
Bring the country together Obama beats Clinton or McCain. Answer, Clinton or McCain can’t bring the Senate let alone the Country
Overall, Obama beats Clinton or McCain. Anwser, Obama has a war chest on money, Clinton is bankrupt, McCain is looking for money with a tin cup.
Race against McCain, Obama better nominee. Answer, McCain best days are behind him he’s too old.
Ending the War in Iraq, Obama will, Hillary or McCain wont. Answer, Bush and McCain want the war to continue for another 50 or 100 years because Bush is a Oilman and McCain is looking for donations
Obama all the way!
Posted by: Lookup | April 23, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Barack ain’t said much about voting for Cheney’s energy bill.
Posted by: liveoak | April 23, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Obama is totally damaged by Wright. No one can get over that he sat in that church for 20 years listening to that drivel. It is no wonder that race relations haven’t improved any more than they have in this country. Somebody is “bitter” and “clinging” and it isn’t small town America. Blacks in America will always be “slaves” if they can’t find a way to move on and with leaders like Wright, that doesn’t look likely to happen any time soon. Imigrants come from all over the world seeking the American dream but what they have going for them is a positive attitude and although they suffer slights and hardships, they find they can prevail.
Posted by: jkr | April 23, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Saint Obama sure doesn’t like it when the tables are turned against him.
Posted by: Robbie | April 23, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Seriously, this has to stop. They should just stop the race with Obama as presidental candidate and Clinton as the VP. That would be the perfect pair
Posted by: new jersey dude | April 23, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
J – It’s not up to Senator Obama “to let the delegates count”. This is a decision of the states and the DNC. If they want those delegates to count then they have to come up with the funding and a fair and (very important) legal process. These states did themselves and everyone a disservice when they made their decision, knowing the conseqences. They were warned well in advance of the outcome. The answer is for them to address their mistake on their own and for Hillary supporters to stop trying to shift the blame. This is only a cheap and transparent device.
Posted by: 63tango | April 23, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Abstract measure? Isn’t this for a nomination of 50 states of the USA? And obama chose to take his name off of the ballot for Michigan to try an make Hillary look bad in Iowa. Now who’s looking bad now?
Posted by: toby | April 23, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Obama is running scared right now because people are CLINGING to CLINTON
Posted by: emmy | April 23, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Hillary has been lying from day one!
Figures don’t lie – but liars can figure.
Posted by: rhbate | April 23, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
The best we can hope for is the superdelegates abstain on the first ballot and throw and throw it open to other candidates…… Then the democrats can get serious and pick someone who can and will win in November…..
Posted by: Steve | April 23, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
reason clinton wants to count the votes in FL and MI, she wants Obama to be confused and make a big mistake. This is getting old it’s all reruns and broken records same old stuff.
Demhypocrisy: Obama’s state wins 30 lost 15, Delegate count 1715 +/-, Negatives are way down, Better nominee
Clinton’s state wins 15 lost 30, Delegate count 1585 +/-, Negatives way up. Not a good nominee.
Fund Raising Obama beats Clinton or McCain Expediently. Answer, Obama $250m, Clinton $150m, McCain $50m.
Registering new voters Obama beats Clinton or McCain. Answer, More people have voted in the history of voting because of Obama being in the race without that hum drum race no excitement.
Bring the country together Obama beats Clinton or McCain. Answer, Clinton or McCain can’t bring the Senate let alone the Country.
Overall, Obama beats Clinton or McCain. Anwser, Obama has a war chest on money, Clinton is bankrupt, McCain is looking for money with a tin cup.
Race against McCain, Obama better nominee. Answer, McCain best days are behind him he’s too old.
Ending the War in Iraq, Obama will, Hillary or McCain wont. Answer, Bush and McCain want the war to continue for another 50 or 100 years because Bush is a Oilman and McCain is looking for donations.
Obama all the way!
Posted by: Lookup | April 23, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Senator Obama may consider the votes from the good peoples of FL and MI “abstract measures” but by any measure the simple truth is Hillary Clinton leads in the popular vote.
I know that you Kool–aid drinkers don’t like to count Florida and Michigan – maybe you all had the same Marxist professors Obama sought out in college – but you see, in America, we count all the votes – and trust me – the Democratic party will not do to Hillary Clinton what was done to Al Gore 8 years ago. Super-delegates will not overturn the will of the people – it’s just that simple – and I know you will whine and complain that they didn’t campaign in FL or that Obama’s name was not on the ballot in MI and that those votes should not count. But the truth is Obama did campaign in FL, running TV for 10 days prior to the election in violation of the agreement he had with the other candidates and the DNC – as for MI, he took his name off for the ballot there by his own accord, in order to curry favor in Iowa and ultimately to invalidate results that he knew would favor Clinton – a somewhat callous and audacious political calculation for such an uplifting, inspiring leader – and one that will fortunately come back to haunt him.
Facts can be terrible things but they are what they are – and after 2.5 million people vote in Puerto Rico, Clinton’s popular vote lead will be insurmountable and undeniable. I could go on but I see by the old clock on the wall it’s time for your next dose of Kool-Aid.
Posted by: oldspice | April 23, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
In TX, Obama won caucus by 10% while lost in popular vote by 4%.
In WA, Obama won caucus by a stunning 37% while only won the popular vote by 5%.
So, what do the numbers tell us? If we transfer all the caucuses to primaries based on the results from TX and WA, Obama should get out of race a long time ago.
So, will you Obama supporters transfer general election to caucus system? Yes, you can ? :)
Posted by: A Fake Idol & A Fake Politician | April 23, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
If the MI and FL votes are counted to justify Hillary Clinton a victory, then i will personnaly work for the destruction of the democratic party.
They should not be counted even if it means the voters are not happy. RULES are RULES. You break them, you suffer.
Just because the voters were stupid enough to vote even when the election was not going to count does not mean we should reward them.
They should have this noise when their dumb state leaders changed the date inspite of warnings.
Posted by: Kat | April 23, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
oldspice – So answer me this, if elections don’t have to follow the rules of the DNC, what keeps me from holding my own? Your argument is flawed my man.
Posted by: jmengate | April 23, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
I wonder if the people of Michigan and Florida feel like they are an “abstract measure”.
Perhaps they are just “typical whites.”
Or “bitter and clinging to guns and religion”.
Wow he sure does know how to turn a phrase that Obama.
Posted by: s.b. | April 23, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
There is no way you can claim that more voters wanted Clinton even if you count Florida AND Michigan. Most of the 237,762 voters in Michigan who voted uncommitted were obviously for Obama, so to arbitrarily ignore them is no more “fair” than any other convoluted system you can come up with.
Posted by: jock59801 | April 23, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Kat – I totally agree. And if Senator Clinton was so against this, why didn’t she object BEFORE the primaries were held? I think we all know the answer to that one.
Posted by: jmengate | April 23, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Do all of the people claiming Michigan and Florida have been “disenfranchised” realize that Hillary signed a pledge that read that she wouldn’t campaign there? It was only after Iowa that she decided to politicize the issue and put her name on the ballot.
She went back on her word for political gain. Get used to that.
Posted by: HankRod | April 23, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Keep spending money, the more these two spend on fighting each other the less they will have to fight McCain. Old John is just sitting back and watching while bank rolling his money. This was the best chance dems had to get elected and they have managed to screw it up, ah life is good.
Posted by: billy bob | April 23, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
People keep talking about rules, since Florida and Michigan violated DNC Rule 11.A. by moving their primaries to a date before the first Tuesday in February. However, the penalty is very specific to violating the primary timing. It is provided in DNC Rule 11, which indicates that the state delegates shall be reduced by fifty (50%). Therefore, Florida & Michigan are being unfairly punished if people are trying to apply the rules fairly.
Posted by: Thegoodman | April 23, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
COUNT FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN VOTES..otherwise you will see a big defection of Democrats to John McCain in the Fall If Obama is the nominee.
Posted by: Antonn | April 23, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Leave it to Clinton to make up stuff.
Posted by: Chris | April 23, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
By Hillary saying that the Florida and Michigan delegates and votes should count, she is actually helping the party, not hurting it. There are obviously very angry people right now in Michigan and Florida who feel that their votes should count and by dismissing them like Obama has, it only makes them less likely to vote at all or vote for the Democratic nominee when it really counts. Obama knows that if Florida and Michigan counted, he would be losing in popular vote, delegate vote and he would be the loser. Both of their names were on the ballot in Florida- count it. Obama ran ads in the state and now that it turns out that he lost he is using it as an excuse to dismiss them. Talk about unifying the party- if Obama would count all of the people and all of the votes and states, then maybe there really could be a unified party. Nice try Obama but once again you show how much of a double-standard your campaign is. If you truly want a Democrat in office then the person who has won the states that matter- the big states and the swing states should be the nominee, which is Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: A | April 23, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
All the talk about the importance of wining cartain states by a democrat follows old logic and political landscape. Obama is changing all that already. He will put together his victory from states democrats had never won before and a different set of demographics than the polititians and the media are used to.
Posted by: Gillis | April 23, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
If Obama had won Florida or Michigan, Hillary would not want those votes to be counted as part of the popular vote.
Posted by: Dawkrod | April 23, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Obama will never win Florida or Michigan..so don’t be fools..better to count those votes now that to see Florida and Michigan go for John McCain in the Fall.
Posted by: Antonn | April 23, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
The undecided superdelegates in the Democratic leadership are watching while Hillary is burning their house.
It’s time the superdelegates rise and take sides, so that the self destruction in the house can be stopped.
Posted by: Concerned | April 23, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
This is too negative!!!When i read some of those ads I am wondering what some supporters are really thinking.It is way too much negative
Posted by: sharly | April 23, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
NO NOMINEE IS ACCEPTABLE WITHOUT THE VOTES OF FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN.
Posted by: Antonn | April 23, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Obama people on here are actually picking apart the 10 percent lead Hillary has over him. You people are ridiculous. HE LOST…get over it. Pennsylvania handed Obama a big NO yesterday.. that was a nice slap in the face for mr holier than thou. It is exactly what he deserves. Now he is crying and whining again. Please..
Hillary is as tough as nails and she is not going away any time soon, so the “agent of change” is resorting to politics as usual.
Posted by: kokopelli | April 23, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Of course the counting of Michigan and Florida is abstract. Get over it Hillary supporters. Fact is, Obama didn´t campaign in those states. Florida and Michigan were long written off by Hillary before they mattered. So now that they matter, you see Hillary scrambling to count their votes. Pathetic. Hillary, stop destroying the Democratic party. I fear that America will once again be stupid and vote for a Republican when all is said and done.
Posted by: George | April 23, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Hillary AND the Super Delegates are handing the PODUS Office to the Republicans. Guess they don’t care about the Democratic party as much as some of you thought they do.
Posted by: Michlle | April 23, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
I give it to Hillary, she is good with words that flows out nice and smooth, except most of her words can’t be trusted.
When she says that the road to Pen ave. leads through Pen. It wounds good, but even that is a half truth.
Posted by: Gillis | April 23, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
the way i understand it is if the secretary of state certified the votes (they count). if obama CHOSE to take his name off the ballot that was his choice. they both ran ads. the dnc cannot override state rights. the states of mich and fl certified the votes. the democrats will pay in november if these voters are left out-it is political suicide for the democrats especially for obama who continues to obstruct the counting of the votes of the two states. obamas margin of error is getting really thin-i really in all sincerity do not believe that obama is electable.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 23, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
I am by no means a fan of either Mrs. Clinton nor Mr. Obama – but he is totally correct about Florida & Michigan. They didn’t follow the rules, so their votes & delegates shouldn’t count. He & John Edwards refused to take part in the illegal voting in Michigan and took their names off the ballot – so he should suffer for that now? I don’t think so. All I’m really hearing hear is whine, whine, whine from the Clinton camp. If Hillary were a person of integrity, her name wouldn’t have been on the ballot in either of those states. She is condoning the illegal votes in those states.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 23, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Clinton was behind 100,00+ votes without these 2 states before the PA primary.
She won by 200,000+ votes last night, so where do people get off saying she’s behind??
Posted by: becky | April 23, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Playing by the “rules” means that the superdelegates are to vote independently, not according to how pledged delegates vote. This is an easy rule to follow.
If playing by the “rules” in Florida and Michigan means disenfranchising millions of voters, then those rules are innately flawed and not so easy to follow.
Posted by: Democrat | April 23, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
If Obama cannot win over white vote, he cannot win G.E…
Clearly, race will be one top issue in this election with 90% of AA voting for their half brother and majority of white voting for white…
The base of Dems inlcudes white, black, latino and other minorities…
The base of Reps will be majority of whites…
So if the whites or other minorities from Dems party won’t vote or vote against Obama, then Obama has little chance to win…..
So far, Obama proved again and again he has been in race just because of his skin….
It is undeniable fact: Obama lost white votes, women votes, Latino votes and other minority votes excluding AA according to past voting records….
Posted by: True Truth | April 23, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
so the ‘great uniter’ is down to forty eight states that follow the rules – back of the bus florida and michigan ! rules what a laugh ! do you think that the whole world is going to abide by the rules ? and how are you going to deal with those delinquents who don’t abide by the rules ? act as if they did not exist and discount their value as in ‘all men are created equal’ ? obama is missing the meaning here – i could be a better president than he could be and i am not in politics at all nor do i want to be -
Posted by: scathinglybrilliant | April 23, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Of course Michigan and Florida cannot be counted. The idea that they could is ludicrous –1) they broke the rules of the party — which however unfair those rules are, were quite grounded. 2) As everyone knows Obama didn’t actually appear on the Michigan ballot in a wise move respectful of the fact that Michigan was breaking the lines of established protocol.
As most of you bloggers are getting into — whichever side you’re on — Hillary needed to make a double digit win in this state which is crucially composed of her support base — and she fell short of that (we can all do the math). But not only did she fall short of 10% she fell far short of a really significant margin all factors considered.
The problem with her and her campaign at this point is that it’s composed of empty divisive comments and a constant narcissism which is soooo obvious that she’s somehow entitled to the office and has amazing layers of diplomatic experience, which isn’t buttressed by any evidence.
She failed miserably and alienated most democrats in her sphere in Washington, putting Bill in the position of sidelining her for the rest of his presidency. Everything she’s claimed about her power and influence as first lady are either severe exaggerations or frank dishonesty — the Sniper fire is only the tip of the iceberg.
Finally, she continues to rip into Barack Obama for lack of substance, with a constant barrage of maneuvers like her 3AM in the morning add which echo Bush and the republican’s strategy of trying to keep the American people in a place of illogical fear by playing heavily on Orwellian tactics.
Finally, if her management of her own campaign which has seen countless disasters, firings, poor choices of managers, financial instability, severe distortions of the truth, and a lack of a significant ability to capitalize on her own strengths (again — with her core power base in Pennsylvania she couldn’t do better than 9.3? — and yes, part of Obama’s power is that he can raise money — it’s a fact of American politics) she’s just not in touch with the reality of what it’s going to take to go up against McCain.
A vote for her at this point is a vote for either 1) a McCain victory — which would be a disaster for the country. I do believe he means what he says — more war and the Bush tax cuts remain as they stand — hence the middle class is crushed. Believe him, he isn’t lying to you. 2) Possibly a Hillary victory — which based on what we’ve seen so far feels like it’s based on a track record which is highly manipulative, dishonest, and is ready to offer a shiny new toy to the dissatisfied consumer. If she’s been in the game this long and is so intensely hated by so many people there must be a reason? Think about that as you watch the next primaries and the power of Barack to connect in powerful ways with where the country could go, rather than through the quagmire of where it’s been for the past twenty years.
Posted by: David Salvage | April 23, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
becky at 5:39p.m.- Clinton was never behind 100,000 votes in the “popular total”, she was down by 700,000. She has now narrowed that to 500,000. But it is a red herring. Democratic nominees are selected by total number of DELEGATES – Obama will win this handily.
Posted by: JW | April 23, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Lewis,that was a great posting. The unfortunate part of this though is that I feel deflated about this whole process. I cannot beleive how complicit the media is in not addressing the lies and misinformation. I now understand why we are in IRAQ now. The American Media. How could we elect GWB 2 times? We seem to deserve HRC. She is the worst of the worst.
Posted by: bill | April 23, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Thanks Wellican for pointing this out:
Hillary DID NOT WIN BY DOUBLE DIGITS. She came close…but fell short. And further, she needed more then a double digit win to really close the gap. She has a net gain of 12 according to cnn.com(8 delegates remain at large), even if you give her all 8 remaining(unlikely at best, only Philly has any Precincts out), she still trails Obama by more then 130 Pledged Delegates. I know the Clintons have trouble with this math stuff…but it’s just not happening Hillary.
Posted by: Steven | April 23, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Again….he can’t win the GE with just the far left and the black vote. If he wins the nomination, he loses the “typical white” people that are more towards the center of the party to McCain. That’s just the way it is.
Posted by: Mack | April 23, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
I just check the Pennsylvania election site and the margin of victory was down to 9.3%. She missed the double digit victory that virtually all “experts” said she needed to win. This bogus reporting smacks of something out of the movie Network where the media is just keeping us riled up so we visit this website and watch their coverage. The campaign is over except everybody backs off what they say just a day ago.
Posted by: Wellican Uzacalculator | April 23, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Last time I checked the people of Florida and Michigan were Americans. So, BO disses Small-Town America and now goes higher and disses these States of the United States of America. Earlier, his reverend friend spewed his venom at America. And, he has attended an affair attended also by a person from the MidEast who is no longer welcome in America. WHAT GIVES WITH THIS GUY?
Posted by: benvictor | April 23, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Howard Dean is a moron..he has shown zero leadership for the DNC..he has no credibility..he is powerless and he is an idiot..COUNT FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN OR NO CREDIBLE NOMINEE WILL COME OUT THE CONVENTION.
Posted by: Antonn | April 23, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Wellican, please redo your math! Clinton has 1260208 PA votes. Dividing her votes by the total of 2305652 votes equa1 .547, which is 55% when rounded up. So she does have a 10% margin win over Obama. You might want to consult your math teacher on a matter like this in the future.
Posted by: Vickie | April 23, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Michigan is a solid democratic state, McCain couldn’t even win the rep. side again Romney. Fla., and Mich., are not going count, there were rules and they didn’t live up to them. Quit whining Hillary!!
Posted by: ndrick50 | April 23, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Try not to be as obsessed with the percentages as you are with Obama. He got spanked after outspending her 3 to 1. Best to learn how to deal with it.
Posted by: Mack | April 23, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
I am so sick of the Clintons. They have no morals and only think of themselves! I wish my husband had been president , so that I could be running now!
Posted by: juneau | April 23, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
I’m from Michigan and voted for Hillary so still have hope for my vote to count. The last 2 presidential elections were stolen by C-R0ve and G-Dubya, so I will gladly support Barack or any other Democrat in or out of a coma! We have to try and reverse some of the damage done over the last 7 years.
Posted by: SicknTired | April 23, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
I can see an argument for including some of the Florida votes into what is considered the “popular vote” I don’t think they should be included in the delegate count as the local party went against the rules of the Democratic party.
However I don’t see any way that it is possible to count the votes in Michigan. With only Hillary’s name on the ballot it is simply ridiculous to count her votes and have no way to count Obama’s.
Hillary and the Republican’s are being dishonest in trying to lay the blame at Obama’s feet for this shambles, The local parties, (Republican) Florida Governor Charlie Crist and the Democrat governor are the people at fault. Obama is simply complying by the rules of the party. After the last President I am presuming we want a President that tries to abide by the rules and doesn’t think that the rules are there to be rewritten if they don’t suit us.
Posted by: vernonwerge | April 23, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
He is absolutely right… Not only that but there are several caucus states that do not track the ‘popular vote’ totals so if Senator Clinton thinks she can disenfranchise Iowa and other caucus states and then count votes from completely TAINTED ELECTIONS IN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN,
SHE AND HER CAMPAIGN ARE SERIOUSLY TRYING TO DO DAMAGE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY!!!
There is an article about how caucuses and primaries are like apples and oranges and they translate into delegates. Delegates give a common measurement for every state!!!!
She can’t win that way so she wants to create the illusion that there is another way…
BUT THERE IS NOT!!!!
IT’S DELEGATES OR NOTHING.
SENATOR OBAMA WILL WIN THIS NOMINATION BY REACHING THE DELEGATE COUNT REQUIRED. IT MAY REQUIRE SOME SUPERDELEGATES but as long as there is not a massive move to vote against their constituents I think it will be accepted. I hope that many will move to endorse Senator Obama now so that the move toward the required number of delegates becomes more apparent.
Obama ’08
Posted by: lb | April 23, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
I love how these Obama lovers point out that Clinton ‘only’ won by some tap danced margin using a high speed calculator.
Never once did they complain when Obamas numbers were rounded up.
I have also never seen the media FREAK OUT on collegues in the SAME LIBERAL MEDIA like they did on ABC when they actually asked the BELOVED OBAMA tough questions.
We are bordering on the THEATRE OF THE UBSURD here folks.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 23, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
thegoodman post: thank you for bringing some new information into the discussion so the sanctions only apply to 50% of the delegate count as per DNC rules rule 11A.
not to the popular vote?
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 23, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
HOW DOES A 9.3 OR 9.4 ROUND UP TO 10%? ACCORDING TO WHAT I KNOW, THEY ROUND DOWN TO 9%, WHICH IS NOT DOUBLE DIGIT!
PLAY WITH NUMBERS, BUT THE FACTS REMAIN THAT THIS IS NOT A 10% VICTORY UNLESS THE REAL NUMBERS PROVE OTHERWISE!
Posted by: TEACHER | April 23, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
SicknTired: I appreciate your open-minded approach to this election, however, if Obama gets his way, your vote will not count. His lawyers were the ones who stood in the way of a revote in Michigan, because he knew he would not win. He is also trying to disenfranchise the voters in Florida.
Obama — Yes We Can (Do anything, no matter how dishonest or immoral to win this election)
Posted by: Fred | April 23, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
The GOP wants Hillary, because McCain would beat her and help the GOP gain in Congress and state levels.
Its time to end the Washington Dynasties and return to democracy.
Posted by: scott jeffries | April 23, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Republicans will not vote for Obama. Many democrats will not vote for Obama. Obama’s edge against another democrat will melt like Frosty’s nose when the entire population of voters are factored in.
Posted by: S | April 23, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Wow… the Obama people are sure nitpicky… whether it is 10% or 9.X%… Who cares? It is a big win for Hillary.
Note: Another nitpicky item… Obama supporters say that he won Texas because of the delegate count… Well, Obama won the Alabama popular vote by a significant amount, but it looks like Hillary is going to win more delegates when the process is through… So does Hillary then win Alabama? AND Obama won Missouri by 1%, yet TIED with Hillary in the delegate count…. So is that a win or a tie?
So HEY… Quit mixing and matching… Either go with popular vote or delegate count to be able to put that state in your winning column.
AND MOST IMPORTANTLY… There is lots of video tape of Obama saying earlier in the primary elections that indeed popular votes are very very important and should count.
AND the rules say 2025 delegates… NOT the most delegates… so Obama cannot win just because he has more delegates than Hillary… ergo convention battle for enough delegates.
I recommend watching the movie “The Best Man” starring Henry Fonda to get an idea about the nomination process. Or historical reporting of the 1968 Democratic convention… or the 1980 convention where Teddy Kennedy challenged incumbent President Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: Nickberry | April 23, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
MI and FL votes will not be counted because Obama has and will block the count. Pretty simple!
Posted by: S | April 23, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
I can’t get past how he treated his own Grandmother when the Rev. Wright scandal broke. This is the measure of the man. To internationally humiliate his Grandmother, to do this to the woman who raised him, to justify his relationship with a racist church and minister is beyond me. I don’t care if she is a closet KKK, how does hurting her make the racist church ok? Oh, wait it was in defense of his “Uncle Wright”, you have to accept his views like any family member = just like Grandma! Throw Grandma under the bus, feel any speedbumps Obama?
Posted by: Merry50 | April 23, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Clinton’s claim of leading in the popular vote is very much akin to her experience in Bosnia landing under sniper fire.
Liar’s never cease!
Posted by: edra | April 23, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
i live in michigan. i did not vote in the democratic primary because obama was not on the ballot. if he had been i would have. if the liar/distorter clinton gets nominated i will send money to mccain and work hard for his election. we can not abide another dishonest person in the white house
Posted by: fred17 | April 23, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Mr. Obama,
What is abstract is not the Florida and Michigan votes – it’s your message andn attitude towards America. It’s one of the most fake foundation any candidate can run on. All voices should be hearded and counted.
Posted by: rock | April 23, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
MI and FL votes will not be counted because Obama has blocked and will block any attempt to do so. He’s just another politician looking out for his own best interests
Posted by: S | April 23, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
just stick anyone in the white house & let’s stop bickering. It has become one long monotone in this country. vote for anybody & shut up already. have a nice day.
Posted by: bbbrain | April 23, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
The key for OBAMA is whining, race card, double standard, running away from debates like scarecrow in hope and audacity.
Please tell me those superdelegates who told us that superdelegates should be in line with the will of their states while they made decision against the will of their own state. If this is not double standard and making up new rule for the LEFT-WING liberal OBAMA, what is it.
Pelosi (California won by Hillary)
Richardson (New Mexico won by HIllary)
Kerry, Kennedy (Mass. won by Hillary)
Herb (gov of Ok. won by Hillary)
These are double talking politician making up new rules everyday for OBAMA.
If New Hampshire could go ahead in the primary last time, why shouldn’t Michigan and Florida. Are they less important or not?
Remember the election in both states are legitimate election with record turnouts.
Talking about bitterness, perhaps, we have to include this as part of the BitterGate of OBAMA.
A president should be of the people, for the people and by the people. Now we have a bunch of delegates who are of the party , for the party and from the party.
I say “FOUL”
Posted by: John_Lai | April 23, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Obama pulled his name from the ballot not the other way around.
Posted by: SicknTired | April 23, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
SAM: She put herself into the normal Vice Presidential Office when they went to the white house in the 90s. She also replaced the “jumbo” portrait that is normally for the vice president (not the 1st lady), that is put up by the president’s “jumbo” portrait at the white house. She thought she was the president so that is why she uses the terms, “I have experience” and, “WE are the President”.
Read: “Ultimate Access”, by Gary Aldrich for these and other slices of life w/ HRC……God Bless America & Save Us…..
Posted by: American Patriot | April 23, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
A LYING LEADER WILL ALWAYS MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HELL!
The words of a leader IS ALL that the average citizen in a huge population can rely on.
When the Clintons continue to make themselves known to the American people as barefaced liars, then the American people cannot complain later when such leaders let them down, AS LIARS MUST LET YOU DOWN!
Hilary Clinton has no principle.
Lies & truths are mere tools of expediency for the ever-deceptive Clintons.
Lying leaders ARE ALWAYS dangerous leaders.
Americans, you have been forewarned AGAIN, with the Clintons!
Posted by: New Yorker | April 23, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Obama has 1045444 PA votes. Dividing his votes by the total of 2305652 equals .453, which translates to 45% when rounded down. 55% Clinton v.s. 45% Obama. It is 10%. Period!
Posted by: Vickie | April 23, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Here is a clue about the importance of the Florida vote:
Hillary at 45% is statistically tied with McCain at 44%.
Obama LOSES (38%) big time to Mcain (53%).
(Rasmussen 4/10/2008)
Posted by: Nickberry | April 23, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Just watched seven hours of John Adams on HBO. A great television series! Then it dawned on me. Hillary and Obama could occupy the same office as this great Founding Father and be President? What a disgrace if either of these two fools would be mentioned in the same breath as Adams or Washington; stunning indeed.
Posted by: ken | April 23, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Hillary will not turn off African American voters. I support Hillary and a great number of intelligent blacks as well. There are the younger generations who know nothing about politics jumping on the bandwagon. If you want true C H A N G E start in your own backyard.
I want a leader who is a fighter. Obama is just a salesperson promising things he can’t deliver. He is constantly pointing at Hillary campaign for negative attacks.
Clintons never played the race issue. Race will always be an issue in America and around the world. I think America is able and one day pick a person of color to be the leader of the Free World.
Frankly, Obama IT’S NOT YOU!!!
Posted by: simcreator | April 23, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I want to set the record STRAIGHT for anyone who doesn’t know. I am a voter from Michigan, and our vote needs to count and I’ll tell you why. In 2004 the DNC set up a commission to review its presidential nominating process to allow a more fair and represntive primary process. Upon completion of the study, the DNC recommended a new sequence in which New Hampshire would hold the 3rd nominating contest. It was ONLY AFTER New Hampshire indicated its intention to VIOLATE this OFFICAL sequence and the DNC officals REFUSED to do anything about it that Michigan decided to move its primary forward.
When we found private donors to fund a re-vote Barack Obama REFUSED to agree to it. Hillary Clinton wants change and she PROVED it by keeping her name on the ballot here. Sometimes to get change you have to go against the grain.
On I-petions we raised over 11,000 signatures and still counting (10,000 by law) to make Howard Dean hear our voices and count our delegates. He has to count our delegates, and Barack Obama fails to realize this. He didn’t want our votes anyway and the ELITEST could care less.
Posted by: Dee | April 23, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I for one am sick and tired of the lame attempt to present Obama as a voice for change. His record in the Senate is one of the worst I have ever seen for the time he has been in office. He has to date had no bills introduced and passed. Is he just a sit back and vote kind of person? Would you like to have a president that cannot present anything to the american people or on capital hill that passes the grade. I am not saying he is not an honest person, but stop telling the people all the things you will do until you actually do something worth talking about.
Posted by: John Hill | April 23, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I am tired of Clinton saying she “won in Michigan”! I am from Michigan and wanted to vote in the Democratic Election, but Obama’s name was NOT on the ballots. So for us that supported him, the only way to truly vote for him was to not vote at all. We were also told in Michigan BEFORE the election, that our votes would not count and it didn’t matter if we voted or not.
How can she win when there was no contest? That’s like dodging bullets when there are no snipers…
… Oh wait – she already did that!
Posted by: Robin | April 23, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Obama suggesting the Michigan and Florida DELEGATES shouldnt count is a valid argument. His blatent attempts to make sure they arent re voted is a joke, but he will be mocked in the general election for that. Not now.
But if he wants to say the popular VOTE in those states dont count, he is on VERY dangerous ground.
Nowhere did the DNC suggest the VOTE wouldnt be recorded.
They clearly said the primary COULD BE HELD. The VOTE would clearly count. But NO DELEGATES would be awarded.
So Obama is on some pretty slippery ice to suggest the voters went out of their way to vote and have their VOICES HEARD do NOT count is not ‘uniting ‘ anything nor a ’50 state strategy’ .
Posted by: tomdavie | April 23, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Geez folks [on both sides]. As a voting Democrat for 36 years to read such negative postings from either camp is embarrassing.
Presidential primaries are not elections. The popular vote totals cannot be aggragated in a primary nor can they be in a general election. It is a false argument for either camp to make. Delegates and electors are the measure of victory.
Seems far too many of you need a civics lesson as well as a lesson in civility.
Posted by: RPS1023 | April 23, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Fred – thank you for that illuminating information. I find it interesting that Obama “the uniter” attends a church that encourages dis-unification.
I am tired the minority of blacks (I sincerely believe/hope this is a minority)screaming loudly and trying to hold ALL white people responsible for slavery and the discrimination they have experienced. My family (until my grandparents generation) were ALL QUAKERS for over 300 years and had been actively involved in the Underground Railroad on both my maternal sides(there is a museum to one of my relations in Indiana and his efforts in the URR – look it up). My paternal side has only been here since the early 1900′s and lived a relatively quiet agricultural life in the northeast.
Blame the people who have actually harmed you (past and present), not the ones who tried to help free you, have supported you or were willing to risk their lives to help in whatever way they could. I have a hard time supporting a man who attends a church that believes because of the color of MY skin, I’m an oppressor. I wasn’t there and MY people were fighting for you for more than a 100 years!
I even had a grandfather who went to war, despite his religion (Quakers are pacifists) to fight for what was right because he believed in your freedom so strongly. He risked his life (nearly lost it), his church membership (actually was thrown out because of his enlistment – later received back in) and the reputation of his family, all to fight a war that in all honesty he could have stayed out of just because he was a Quaker. He could have used that excuse, but he refused to take the easy way out.
So if I understand all this garbage I’ve heard about Obama’s church and the words of his spiritual advisor, free speech applies only to the hate speech spewed by minorities and hate speech must be condemned when whites say it? If a member of any minority spews hate, that’s OK because they have to right to say it and it’s their experience? Is that the drift?
Well then, I sure don’t know what my problem is. I don’t tolerate hate speech toward any group by anyone at anytime. Must be a waste of my time to stand up for tolerance and equality and trying to do my small part in eliminating hate when I see it. No matter who the group is or who the hate is directed toward.
Sorry, racism can’t be claimed by one minority and then ignored when their own people practice it.
Posted by: TiredofTheHate | April 23, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Why has the Obama campaign become so negative? He said in in his speach last night to tell Washington “not this time” but yet his style is just politics as usual.
Posted by: Carl | April 23, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
The pledged delegate count is largely irrelevant at this point, except as a reflection of the “will of the voters”.
Indeed, what does the delegate count do at this point that the popular vote does not do better?
Last night’s HRC win, taking into account Florida where Obama was on the ballot, and disregarding Michigan where he was not, puts Hillary within 200,000 popular votes of Barack–the same amount she netted last night in one contest.
Hillary and Barack are neck-in-neck in the popular vote count no matter how yo slice it.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | April 23, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Robin
I am tired of Obama fans suggesting that all the people who voted for Clinton or UNCOMMITED shouldnt be recognized.
The DNC never said their vote ‘wouldnt count’. They said no DELEGATES would be awarded.
Millions in michigan and florida went out to support Obama in uncommited and his name in Florida to SHOW SUPPORT.
That support certainly can be counted.
Just not the delegates.
You cant have it 15 different ways.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 23, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Robin:
Thanks….very cool comments…..
Posted by: tony | April 23, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Collaborates in taking away the seats of Michigan and Florida should be held responsible for their wrong doings. I think democrates of both states should stay home in the general election if OBAMA is nominated by the party. This is the only way to tell those double standard politician that they are making a big mistake.
Voters of Michigan and Florida should tell the party to go to hell (LOUD & CLEAR) with their unAmerican and undemocratic decision to silence them in the primary.
IF OBAMA DOESN’T WANT YOUR VOTES COUNT, WHY SHOULD YOU VOTE FOR OBAMA AT ALL.
The best way is for the voters in both states to fight for their rights is to collect signatures that ‘you shall not vote for OBAMA in this election if voters of your states are deprived of their rights.
Posted by: John_Lai | April 23, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Obama’s motto and theme should be Pay per Vote. Obama overspent in Pennnsylvannia and still a loser.
Look at the facts as to how strong Hillary is:
Obama lost in Pennsylvannia in spite of endorsement by a Senator and overspending in ads, 5 to 1.
Obama lost in Texas and Ohio even overspending in ads and manipulating info in Ohio.
Obama lost in California even though Oprah, Maria Shriver, and Katherine Kennedy endorsed him.
Obama lost Massachusetts even though Kennedy and John Kerry endorsed him.
Hillary won the big states and has more electoral college votes to date than Obama that is crucial in November.
Obama lost the big states even though the media is most of the time unfair with Hillary and always positive to Obama.
Wake up superdelegates! You will make the right choice if you pick Hillary.
Obama mocked the Pennsylvannians and the entire nation, which is so irresponsible and very degrading to all Americans. He is just like Wright who mocked the Americans and like Rezco and Ayers who we can’t trust.
Wake up superdelegates!
Posted by: Alfredo | April 23, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
For those still confused, why medias are calling it a 10% win, it’s rounded from 54.6% vs 45.4% to 55% vs 45% (rounded up and down respectively).
Posted by: Dao | April 23, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Obama’s motto and theme should be Pay per Vote. Obama overspent in Pennsylvannia and still a loser.
Look at the facts as to how strong Hillary is:
Obama lost in Pennsylvannia in spite of endorsement by a Senator and overspending in ads, 5 to 1.
Obama lost in Texas and Ohio even overspending in ads and manipulating info in Ohio.
Obama lost in California even though Oprah, Maria Shriver, and Katherine Kennedy endorsed him.
Obama lost Massachusetts even though Kennedy and John Kerry endorsed him.
Hillary won the big states and has more electoral college votes to date than Obama that is crucial in November.
Obama lost the big states even though the media is most of the time unfair with Hillary and always positive to Obama.
Wake up superdelegates! You will make the right choice if you pick Hillary.
Obama mocked the Pennsylvannians and the entire nation, which is so irresponsible and very degrading to all Americans. He is just like Wright who mocked the Americans and like Rezco and Ayers who we can’t trust.
Wake up superdelegates!
Posted by: Alfredo | April 23, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Why couldn’t Hillary close the deal? She led in funding, she had the support of the AA community and she lost eleven contests in a row. She’s broke, she’s behind by 600,000 votes and will pick up 9 or so delegates from PA, which will probably be wiped out by superdelegates joining Obama even before the next vote. Then she will lose two more major states on May 6. Why couldn’t she close the deal?
Posted by: sumac61 | April 23, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Obama constantly does double talk. He says he is leading in the popular vote, but it doesn’t matter if you count FL and MI…because those Clinton votes don’t matter. Lol. Just wait until the convention and see that those votes will be counted.
I’m not that pro-Clinton, but lately Obama’s lying and elitism are such major turn-offs.
Posted by: Jon | April 23, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
ok, so Hillary gets to say she won….even when her name was the only one on the ballot? and….thats ok with you guys? its, like…a “win”?!?
..
wow.
so she’s so hard up, she counts running alone as racing?!?!
i think the popular vote for Fla. should count, as both names were an option…but c’MON…..saying you won when you were the only option other then abstaining is like…well….cheating at solitaire.
kinda pointless, ya know?
Posted by: mme | April 23, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Obama constantly does double talk. He says he is leading in the popular vote, but it doesn’t matter if you count FL and MI…because those Clinton votes don’t matter. Lol. Just wait until the convention and see that those votes will be counted.
I’m not that pro-Clinton, but lately Obama’s truth dodging, and elitism are such major turn-offs.
Posted by: Jon | April 23, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
so louis can we assume Senator Clinton has your vote?
Posted by: Beau | April 23, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Not all the people in Michigan who voted UNCOMMITED voted for Barack Obama
John Edwards was also lumped into the UNCOMMITED status also. I know a few people here who voted that way, but are now supporting Clinton. So don’t think
ALL the uncommited votes here were for Obama.
HILLARY 08!!!
Anyone can “believe” in change… vote for change you can COUNT ON!!!
Posted by: Dee | April 23, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
At the end of the day, Obama will never let the votes in FL and MI be counted. Too risky!
Posted by: S | April 23, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Obama did not campaign in Florida…and his name was not even on the ballot in Michigan. Clinton’s so-called victories were little different from the elections in Iraq where Saddam always received 99.5% of the vote.
Posted by: Truesdell | April 23, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
I agree with the comments of those who distinguish between delegates and popular votes. Obama can’t ignore the votes of the citizens in the critical states of Michigan and Florida. It is an “abstract measure” to count votes cast by hundreds of thousands of citizens? How do you spell “demeaning?” His comments just underscore the attitude of Bittergate that infuriated so many. Also, if he is so “into” the popular vote concept, he should give up the delegates won via the elitist caucus system in Texas. There, while the popular vote clearly went for Hillary, the in-crowd attending the caucuses (Read: like superdelegates) voted against the popular vote. So Superdelgates should follow the popular vote but caucuses shouldn’t? What a hypocrite!
Posted by: anne1244 | April 23, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
The only game being played here is by Obama. The voters in both those states should be allowed to re vote. Clinton won both states and she is willing to have a re vote. What is Obama so afraid of? He sounds like the George Bush Jr campaign in Florida in 2000! He ran TV commercials for 3 weeks in Florida leading up to a “vote” he said shouldn’t count! Hillary has been easy on Obama, democrats wake up! Look at the ads Republicans are running against those who endorsed him in NC! This guy will bring down the entire ticket in November! He is the guy republicans truly want to run against! As a Democrat , who has worked for many, many african american candidates… I can not vote for Obama for President of the US in 2008… 2016 (when he grows up and doesn’t say dumb things like like “let me eat my waffle”) maybe!
Posted by: John in Cape May | April 23, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
She was NOT the only one on the ballot here so was Dennis Kucinich, Gravel, and Dodd and also uncommited. Where are you getting your info. ?
Posted by: Dee | April 23, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Obama lovers INSIST on lumping the VOTE to the delegates in Michigan and Florida.
The DNC allowed the primaries. They allowed the ballots, the right for people to VOTE, and tallied up the vote. Then they stripped them of the delegates.
Since when does the VOTE not count?
There is NO provision that the VOTE doesnt count. Just the delegates.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 23, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
OMG-WAKE UP PEOPLE!! Let’s at least DEMAND that Obama participate in another debate BEFORE the nomination so that we can at least get one more chance to see him under fire with some tough questions. DEBATE DO-OVER to get a FAIR assessment of this unknown commodity called Obama!! This man is running for POTUS for pete’s sake!! Look at some of his ridiculous comments – Obama won’t even man-up and insist on counting the FL & MI votes. This means suicide for the Dems in the GE if Obama is the nominee!! Please FINAL 9 smack down Obama back to his shady friends in Chicago so that we don’t give it to McCain in the general election!!! PLEASE LISTEN NOW DNC LEADERSHIP AND GET US AN ELECTABLE NOMINEE – WAKE UP!!!!!!!!
Posted by: fairsuperdelegates08 | April 23, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
I know. Obama the great UNITER with a ’50 state strategy’ REFUSES to count the popular vote of those states, or even do the right thing and REVOTE ???????????????????????
It gets to the point the only thing saving him from sure disaster is MEDIA SPIN . They could easily CHASTISE him for trying to shove those states away.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 23, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Obama has 1721.5 pledged delegates and super delegates compared to Hilary’s 1593.5. There are 360 pledged delegates available. If each wins 50% that puts Obama at 1874.5 and Clinton at 1746.5. That leaves 360 superdelegates left to decide the vote. That means in order for her to reach the 2025 threshold she would have to get 274 delegates out of the 360 left, that is 91% I don’t think that is even possible. Where as Barack only needs 151 votes which is 42% which is highly probable. The contest is over.
Posted by: Bryan | April 23, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Today Hillary is not asking for Mich & Fla to count toward the nomination. She’s just saying they should count toward the psychological standard of who has received the most votes. Unfortunately she is completely off base on either “count”.
In Mich & Fla all candidates agreed not to campaign, and the contests were disqualified by their sponsoring organization. It’s like saying a scrimmage should count toward the play-offs. Absolutely, ridiculously out of the question! Camp Clinton rhetoric about “counting every vote” in this situation is pure unadulterated bull.
Posted by: Paul Tinker | April 23, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
clinton is an idiot…. she was the only one on the ballot… of course she wants it counted… if obama won those states she would dispute and say she doesn’t want it counted…. hypocrite!
Posted by: dave | April 23, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Fred – thanks for the wonderful info……. 10 Million for Hillary…. I can add another lie to Your list and to Rose’s list of Obama Lies…. It’s an interview with Karl Rove – one of my least favorite people – Rove states that Obama printed something in one of his books that Rove was supposed to have said and Rove denies having said it.
Posted by: SM | April 23, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Neither side seems to understand, presidential primaries DO NOT TOTAL votes, only delegates. I suppose there are some of you who believe you vote DIRECTLY for a president as opposed to voting for a slate of electors?
Seems as if you flunked civics and civility, play nice lest you desire to see McCain and Co. giggling in your White House.
Posted by: RPS1023 | April 23, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
“I’ve always believed that if you’re tough you don’t have to talk about it.” But you keep talking & talking & talking about it Obama, always talking about everything but the issues and what your “CHANGE FOR AMERICA” will be. Simply getting to the White House is not “CHANGE”. You have no substance, just empty excuses and empty words.
Posted by: someonewhoknows | April 23, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
It’s funny how Obama has changed his stance now that the numbers aren’t so favorable. Before he used to warn the superdelegates about overturning the “will of the people.” To me, the will of the people is the POPULAR VOTE. And yet now, he is saying that it is delegates that matter, not the popular vote.
That being said, I think that whoever wins the popular vote should take this. FL should count. MI is tricky, we do have the “uncommitted” but a big portion of those people were actually for Edwards. Hillary got 55% of the vote there, and even against both “uncommitteds” 100k more votes.
So my question is, how do we handle MI? Seems unfair to just throw out the uncommitted vote entirely. Although Obama and Edwards did voluntarily remove their names, it still seems the WILL OF THE VOTERS spoke. So how to decide what portion was Edwards and what Obama? Exit polls I’m sure measured this, but that’s a very unreliable way to decide something of this importance.
Thoughts?
Posted by: JA | April 23, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
RPS, We know how it works. What we are arguing is that the “will of the voters” – who Obama has been a supposed champion of for some time – is best measured by the popular vote. And that the superdelegates should rank that above pledged delegates.
Posted by: JA | April 23, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Obama knows all about having one person on ballot, look at his State Senate elections. Obama successfully muscled off other competitor (first time, his own mentor and who helped him get started on State Senate run) so that he was the only one on the ballot as he came into the arena inexperienced. Of all people to criticize that his name wasn’t on Michigan ballot so it doesn’t count, he’s a hypocrite.
Posted by: Dao | April 23, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Becky: She was behind by nearly 700,000 votes before Pen. SO now she is behind by about half million 500,000 votes. I don’t think she can make that up and then get ahead of him in the remaining contests. Unless Obama is just standing still.
Posted by: Gillis | April 23, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Count FL and MI than Obama will be far behind!
Posted by: David | April 23, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
ONE MORE TIME….She was NOT the only one on the ballot here in Michigan, so was Dennis Kucinich, Gravel, and Dodd and also uncommited. In 2004 the DNC set up a commission to review its presidential nominating process to allow a more fair and represntive primary process. Upon completion of the study, the DNC recommended a new sequence in which New Hampshire would hold the 3rd nominating contest. It was ONLY AFTER New Hampshire indicated its intention to VIOLATE this OFFICAL sequence and the DNC officals REFUSED to do anything about it that Michigan decided to move its primary forward.
When we found private donors to fund a re-vote Barack Obama REFUSED to agree to it. Hillary Clinton wants change and she PROVED it by keeping her name on the ballot here. Sometimes to get change you have to go against the grain.
On I-petions we raised over 11,000 signatures and still counting (10,000 by law) to make Howard Dean hear our voices and count our delegates. He has to count our delegates, and Barack Obama fails to realize this.
Posted by: Dee | April 23, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
As a democrat from another country, I am very amased that in united states candidates from the same party would try to run a negative campaign against the members of the same party(clinton against obama), this was started by Mrs.clinton and it dose not seem to end, why is Mrs.clinton wasting party member’s time and money? why would someone write this article based on ifs just to attack the other member of the party? why not talk about real issues like economy, war, … ? people from other parts of the world lookup to you guys!
As someone who is just watching united states election I have felt more and more hate against Mrs.Clinton while at the start of the race she was my favorite.
Posted by: Roozbeh Afrasiabi | April 23, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
JA…all the MI and FL delegates will be seated but sadly for both delegations I doubt if any Rules/Credential Cmmte. will allow them to cast a first ballot vote. The committee is weighted to the party with the most delegates therefore the state parties have shot themselves in the foot
Posted by: RPS1023 | April 23, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
DNC has noway out other than adoover in MI and seat FL as is!
Than you will see a real election Obama is going to loose both the delegate and the popular vote count lead!
DNC can not write off this election by handing over to Obama!
Posted by: Sam, PA | April 23, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Don’t worry about MI and FL. When the time comes, it will be all unveiled that it’s unconstitutional to not count legal votes already casted according to the Supreme Court. DNC may not seat the delegates by their rules, but popular votes is not in their control. And since Obama’s been touting that nominee should be decided by the people and not be overturned by superdelegates. He’ll get just that at the convention. A re-vote will actually help Obama so that he gets fair share of MI popular votes unless he’s afraid, of course.
Posted by: Dao | April 23, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Recent polls also show Obama would lose to McCain in Massachusetts. Reason cited is current Governor Deval Patrick ran on same “Change with no experience” campaign as Obama. Note: Gov. Patrick was also “helped” by Axelrod to win his seat. Also remember Obama’s “Just Words” speech which was nearly identical to Patrick’s original “Just Words” speech. But now Gov. Patrick has very low approval rating with his constituents. Evidently the citizens of Massachusetts don’t want to suffer the same problem with Obama by electing a President with good rhetoric but no real experience (they’ve “been there done that”). We should all think about that. POTUS is not an entry level position after all. My first choice will be Clinton and my second choice will be McCain.
Posted by: CollegeEducatedLatteDrinker | April 23, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
I am from FL and I demand the democratic party to seat FL delegates!
All 3 of the candidates were at the ballot!
Obama
Clinton
EdwardsSEAT FL DELEGATES
DO OVER MI
Posted by: Susan, FL | April 23, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Old politics is all about keeping people dumbed down so they can be motivated to vote against their own best interests. Obama is all about lifting people up. That’s hard to do because the media like the Clinton News Network (CNN) will work to maintian the status quo. The last few day had been all about the Clintons on that station
Posted by: Gillis | April 23, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
regardless of what people were “told”….his NAME was not there. her name was the only one.
so, your saying that thats ok, right?
that thats a “win” for her?
soooo….
if i run down a sidestreet in NY as fast as i can, do i get to say i won a “race in NY”?
i mean….at least acknowledge the validity of this point…
you cant win if you’re the only one running.
winning, after all, requires competition.
Posted by: mme | April 23, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
RPS, you are missing my point. If you are to speak of the will of the voters, the popular vote is what counts. This will have to weigh on the minds of the superdelegates. Can you imagine if, after years of griping that Gore won the popular vote but lost to Bush, the Democratic party actually gave the nomination to someone who did not win in the popular vote?
Trust me, if (and that’s a big IF since we still don’t know how to handle MI) Hillary wins the popular vote, you will see some great pressure on superdelegates to respect the will of the voters. And that, I think, could give Hillary the win here.
Either way, this is gonna be interesting.
Posted by: JA | April 23, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Seat Fl and doover MI
Who ever wins than we talk!
Posted by: Dan | April 23, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Obama and other senior dems accuse Hillary of destroying party. Obama is the one destroying. I dont know how he can win the GE making such comments about FL and MI. Wakeup Dean….
Posted by: SJ, Georgia | April 23, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
JA…then if everyone knew/knows the rules [as you imply] one cannot present an argument during the game aka NEW RULES.
I suggest all passionate parties take the time to run as a delegate so in 2012 the Rules will reflect only a popular vote which makes no sense for if it did our Founding Fathers and all who followed would have implemented such a system.
Posted by: RPS1023 | April 23, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Let’s march all together we threaten the DNC!
either seat FL and doover MI or we won’t back U in November!
Call the DNC and leave a message!
Posted by: Amy, call the dnc good idea | April 23, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
This article continues the mass media’s failure to acknowledge the uncertain nature of a “popular” vote count in the first place. At least four caucus states do not report the actual votes used to determine the precinct delegates. Furthermore the different methods used in each state mean that turnout rates will vary greatly according to the method used.
Obama is exactly right in saying that the “popular vote” in this sort of setting is an abstract exercise. There’s really no such thing as a national popular vote in a party primary, when each state uses such different methods of voting, counting, and reporting.
Posted by: Gene L | April 23, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
YES, SHAME ON ME FOR POSTING THE FACTS. THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS, I DON’T DISLIKE OBAMA, I DISLIKE WHAT HE’S DOING AND THAT’S LYING TO THE PEOPLE. WHEN QUESTIONED FIRST ABOUT ISSUES, DENIES THEM FIRST, THEN CONFRONTED WITH THE FACTS, THEN HE CONFESSES. WHY LIE? WE LIVE IN A HIGHTECH WORLD. ANYBODY CAN FIND OUT ANYTHING THEY WANT ABOUT YOU. SO WHY LIE? YES, SHAME ON ME…….HE OWES A BIG APOLOGY TO ALL THE EARLY STATES HE DOOPED BY HOLDING FACTS IN THE CLOSET SO THEY’D VOTE FOR HIM. HOW CAN ANYBODY BE PROUD OF A LEAD THAT HAS BEEN EARNED BY DECEPTION? YES, SHAME ON ME……….
Posted by: ROSE | April 23, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Wait a minute…
If every vote was counted in the Democratic Primaries, including Florida and Michigan as they should, then the majority of the votes would go to Sen. Hillary Clinton because those two key states did chose Hillary. Those voters will count at the general election – in fact they will be crucial for Democrats to take the White House – and for that reason, those voters wishes and choice have to be taken into consideration.
Now, If for some un-democratic reason Florida and Michigan voters are left out from the Primary vote count, then…. The super delegates must weigh the value of those “uncounted but existing votes”, and show a honest representation – whict will tip the balance toward Hillary Clinton.
If the DA and Sup Delegagtes do not act JUSTLY, then they will not bet elected in the fall of 2008.
Posted by: Retrovvision | April 23, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
RPS, once again you do not read what I said. I did not say let the popular vote decide, I said that the popular vote will have to weigh heavily on the superdelegates, since that would in effect be respecting the will of the voters. Understand?
Posted by: JA | April 23, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Yes let’s not count the voters of Florida or Michigan—they don’t count. The votes of Pennsylvania people do not matter either apparently as Obama downplayed Pennsylvania’s outcome— nor the people in California, New York, Ohio, Texas, now Pennsylvania the biggest states in our Union. 92% of black voters in PA voted for Obama —that like saying is “I don’t care if he is qualified or not, as long as he is black”—and there is no race card!!!!!! Such underlying principles will destroy America as we know it today.
Posted by: Anne | April 23, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Gene L,
In fact your point about Caucuses undermines your position. Obama benefitted greatly in the caucus states. Hillary would be more than willing, I am sure, to exclude those. :)
Posted by: JA | April 23, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Let Hillary have Michigan and Florida … it will put her ahead by 122,000 votes. Then, after Obama takes a 300,000+ margin of victory in NC we can end this mess. Hang in there Obama supporters, it should finally be over on May 6.
Posted by: UMMMMM | April 23, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Michigan’s election was legal and sanctioned by our Michigan Supreme Court before it was even held. Obama and Edwards voluntarily chose to remove their names from our ballots. They were on the ballots originally!! NOTE: They didn’t choose to voluntarily remove their names from Florida. Why I wonder did they treat both states differently? Michigan should be counted as votes were originally and legally cast by our citizens. Our election says we vote for who is on the ballot. If you choose to remove your name from our ballot then we don’t vote for you specifically because well you took your name off the ballot. And people could vote “Uncommitted” if they didn’t like who was on the ballot. It’s a simple concept!!!!!
Posted by: MichiganCitizen | April 23, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Super Delegates need to line up behind Hillary. She is THE ONLY ONE who has a chance to beat McCain. Based on a Fox analysis, if Florida and Michigan were counted and Obama was given the uncommitted vote in Michigan, the delegate difference would only be 50 or so. This difference could easily be made up by Hillary in the remaining contest or Super Delegates or pledged delegates that switch. Obama is just not Presidential material and I would gladly contributed to the North Carolina guy who wants to run Swift Boat Ads against Obama. The truth about Obama needs to be exposed!!
Posted by: Debbie | April 23, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
ABC News has no credibility after the debate debacle.
Posted by: jjschmidt98 | April 23, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Antoin – That was a lot of words but you did not address the issues raised in my first post. Just like O’bama, you evade.
Posted by: ShelbyBob35051 | April 23, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
It is funny to me how no one remembers that not that long ago Hilary Clinton did not care about the votes in MI and FL being counted. In fact she only “cares” about them now because she is losing. Also why did all the politicians in the state accept the consequences just to cry about it later. Please play by the rules.
Independent Voter
Posted by: Arie | April 23, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
There was nothing tricky about the Michigan vote. Both, obama and Edwards knew eactly what they were doing,bet Edwards would be honest about it and say: ” It was a lost cause – Hillary had it all the way, why look bad by keeping your name on the ballot when it was not supposed to count?” Good strategy, just not thought through. Ultimately, even if they count those votes obama isn’t hurt. Can’t lose something you never had. Vite a thousnad times on a thousnad differnt days Michigan goes to Clinton. There you have the reason there was no revote.
Posted by: Beau | April 23, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Follow rules, as in civilized society.
Follow rules!
Posted by: Linda,Fl | April 23, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Obama should just drop out due to lack of experience. The man is no way close to being qualified for the most complicated job in America. How did he get this far in the process in the first place? He has virtually no international experience at all, minimal US Senate experience, and questionable judgment based on his past associations. Obama for President???
Posted by: JC | April 23, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
S i’m not sad enough to have time to refute all 66 charges but I must say that Hilary crying in New Hampshire(Shows she’s so tough!) is equivalent to all 66 accusations that Rose made about Obama. The truth is Hilary can’t win! It’s plain and simple because MCCAIN comes across as more genuine. Personally, I wouldn’t go as far as voting for MCCAIN but I would never vote for Hilary after her antics. I know Obama will win the nomination but key is when. I believe that Hilary is trying to prolong this race to sabotage Obama’s chances of winning the presidential race so that she can run again in 2012. Anyway lets see if she concedes in NC. Obama ’08
Posted by: ALREADY_A_WINNER! | April 23, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Well, let’s see. Obama has a whopping two years of federal experience, most of which he has simply spent posturing and campaigning for the presidenty.
Obama’s foreign relations experience consists solely of a trip to Kenya to visit relatives (that’s “foreign relations,” right?).
Obama has a close, 25-year relationship with Jeremiah Wright and the hateful Black Nationalist movement. Then Obama pretends he didn’t know Wright is a bad guy.
Obama has a 17-year relationship with Chicago’s preeminant slum lord and scum bag Antoni Rezko, who helps Obama buy his house. Then Obama pretends he didn’t know Rezko is a bad guy.
Obama launches his state senate campaign with an event at the home of terrorist Bill Ayers, serves on a charity board with Ayers and gives speeches with him. Then Obama pretends he barely knows the guy.
Obama promised us “change” in Illinois too, but has done nothing but cut deals to enrich himself and his wife while cashing our paychecks.
Obama cleverly flips off Clinton during a speech last week and smirks while the crowd cheers.
And the list goes on and on.
Gee, what’s not to like about Obama? Sure, he has experience, character and judgment to be the most powerful leader in the world during these especially challenging times. How tough can it be? LOL
Nobama. No way. Ever.
Posted by: Tom | April 23, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“Based on a Fox analysis, if Florida and Michigan were counted and Obama was given the uncommitted vote in Michigan, the delegate difference would only be 50 or so.”
dude….based on a fox analysis, the “surge” is working, mission was “accomplished”, and cheny really felt bad about shooting his buddy in the face.
Posted by: mme | April 23, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
THERE WERE MILLIONS OF US WHO ONLY
CAUCUSED. HOW DO WE GET COUNTED
ACCURATELY? ADD A COUPLE OF MILLION
TO OBAMAS COUNT THEN..
Posted by: Reilly | April 23, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Barack, Michelle, Jeremiah, Louis, Micheal Moore, Bill Maher, the New Black Panthers Party, Move On, Larry Leggis, the Black Nationalist Movement, the Weather Underground and on and on.
Obama is the Trojan horse for hard-left hate in America. Nothing more. He will be defeated by intelligent and decent Americans everywhere.
Posted by: Jason Beck | April 23, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Okay, here we go again….Obama starting to whine again…..he has lots of money … and still he lost….he is slated to win in NC, but Clinton should pick up more in Indiana…..if things don’t go Obama’s way, he just has to complain….get a life, Obama….
Posted by: dixiecharms | April 23, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
I attended the Clinton Family Rally in Philly on Monday night. Like him or not, Bill Clinton said one thing that will stcik with me no matter who emerges in this race.
He said, “When someone tells you ‘You can’t win!’, it’s probably because they’re afraid you CAN.”
Although I prefer Clinton, at the end of the day, I just want a democrat in the oval office, but I will say this: Right now, Obama smacks of a man afraid of a woman, trying to bully her into quitting because deep down, he knows she is tenacious and stubborn enough to keep going no matter how many “men” tell her she can’t win!
Doesn’t anyone who supports Obama see that Hillary is equally suitable as a President, and that perhaps her tenacity distinguishes her at a very profound level?
If Obama can’t beat her, I guarantee you, McCain has no chance. Why shouldn’t Obama step aside AND SUPPORT HER TO BRING DEMOCRATS TOGETHER.
SHE IS AHEAD IN THE POPULAR VOTE!
WHO IS AFRAID OF WHOM?
Posted by: mike | April 23, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
So, the superdelegates shouldn’t ignore the will of the people? Didn’t the caucus-goers in Texas ignore the will of the people of Texas? If you are OK with an undemocratic caucus system, you shouldn’t object to the superdelegates being treated as caucus-goers of a big 51-th state which awards 350 delegates total. If Hillary wins this super-caucus, she will be a legitimate winner of the race!
Posted by: Bob | April 23, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
The prissy Barack Obama has a less diverse voting coalition of upsale voters, college students (eventually the same demographic as upscale), and black.
Then we have Hillary Clinton with woman, working class whites, Asians, Latinos, gays/lesbians, pop stars from Great Britain and hobbits from Middle Earth.
Posted by: Lalo | April 23, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
You go Tom! I have been posting on here for several weeks now and not one O’bama supporter can make a sensible argument why anyone but another Black Nationalist or a duped individual would vote for O’bama. O’bama is steeped in the Black Nationalist/Power movement and unless you disagree with the likes of Martin Luther King, Jr., you should not be voting for him.
Posted by: ShelbyBob35051 | April 23, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Hillary raised 10 million in 24 hours and it is not over yet!
LOL
Posted by: 10 MILLION IN 24 HOURS | April 23, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Edwards is supposed to be the candidate of blue collar workers. Blue collar workers have clearly spoken ( Fact: Obama has only won the blue collar vote in one state Wisconsin). He should endorse Hillary before NC or he is a complete fraud!
Posted by: John in Cape May | April 23, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Wellican, I do not get scared by your “professor” name tag. So you think Hillary supporters are too stupid to understand your math? I guess you could be part of the reason why many young people in this country do not like “math”!
Posted by: Vickie | April 23, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
JA…yes I read your post…alas I was a delegate in 1996…cast my vote for Bill Clinton. Super delegates will vote as they see fit but they will not vote as others see fit. They are of their own minds as defined by the Rules Committee. Each will vote based on their own criteria and neither you, me or any others will be the criteria.
I thank you for the lively debate JA…always remember the Rules are agreed to prior to any contest not during. f one does not care for the Rules one must present their case prior to the contest or else look foolish and weak post facto.
Posted by: rps1023 | April 23, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Obama proved his Marxist blindness perfectly when he tried to defend his proposed increase on capital gains taxes.
Belief in punitive marginal tax rates is a tenet of good Marxists in the US.
Charles Gibson pointed out that revenues increase with lower rates, but Obama clung to his playbook, unable to deal with facts contrary to his learned responses.
The fact that he has palled around with far-left hate mongers for decades is coming out, finally, and it now seems to be why Obama avoids debates. He’s like a frightened school girl afraid that he might make a fool of himself again as he did on ABC, or be called to account for a clear pattern of action and statements a Dorhn, Ayers or Wright would be proud of.
It is all out there, and “hope” and “change” fit perfectly with Ayers speech in 2007 at the SDS reunion about how to keep the revolution moving forward in the coming years. Big, wide, vague talk “until we can act”, with their kind of people in positions of power.
Obama is an astounding hack. He is unfit to be a dogcatcher, much less senator. And president? My God.
Posted by: Julio | April 23, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
I am soooo tired of people saying the African Americans will support him because he is black. I would give the African American community more credit than that.
Also, I think Barack Obama FORGOT that he is way more, middle-eastern and white, than black. I hope the African-American community realizes this.
Posted by: Dee | April 23, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
The problem is not about popular vote v’s delegates there is another key strategic issue for democrats if they want to win in November for not all delegates are created equal. For the Democrats the key strategic issue is which states did Obama win V’s Clinton. The Democrats need to choose the best candidate to beat McCain in the bigger states and those they can win and therefore take all the Electoral College votes of that state. The question is therefore who is the best candidate to win in the bigger states and those states which the Democrats have the best chance of winning? Being popular in smaller states and or those McCain will win is pointless therefore the votes of the delegates from those states are also not as valuable or even worthless. This fact might be sad but it is true. Surely this will be obvious to the democratic strategists and the super delegates and will therefore influence their decision. My pick is that they would try to stitch up a deal to have both on one ticket if egos will allow it. The deal being the Vice President being assured of the top spot next time around. Because of age etc this would be Hillary on top Obama as VP ???
Now that would be interesting.
Posted by: ME_NZ | April 23, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Reading so many snide and “bitter” posts by Clinton fans here just goes to prove that she really does appeal to the less educated. In Michigan, if Barack had campaigned, he surely would have chipped away at her base and also inpired new voters as he has everywhere else, so the argument that his votes were cast as uncommited and that is all he actually would have attained is ludicrous and weak at best. Those who felt there was no choice simply stayed at home. PA should have been a pure blowout and I am sorry…it was less than 10 and even 10 does not constitute the type of victory she should have scored with the perfectly suited constituency she enjoyed in that State. And yet…you will see a double digit loss for her in NC and there is nothing she can do to cut into him, she never has cut into his base and he has certainly been able to turn some of hers around. And did someone catch the immediate endorsement of the OK governor the day after his defeat? Seems like he cast his support to Barack in spite of the contrived victory in PA. Basically…he saw the forest for the trees. Let us say “timber” now…because Hillary is still falling.
Posted by: iam | April 23, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Hillary is absolutely winning the popular vote.
Florida and Michigan votes must be included…over 2 million people cast their votes…and THEY MUST COUNT!
We have 50 states in America, and every one of their voters must count.
Hillary is leading by about 200,000 votes….and Hillary has won all the big states needed to beat McCain.
Hillary will be our next President!
Posted by: John P. | April 23, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
If Obama won FL/MI, would Hillary want those votes counted?!???
No, and the party leaders shouldn’t concede rules to someone just because they’re losing.
Posted by: chris | April 23, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
The citizens of Florida and Michigan deserve to have their votes counted.They took the time to lawfully participate in their states’ Democratic primaries.In the 2000 election,we heard time and again how Americans’ votes should all be counted.We live in a democratic republic and Americans votes should be counted.I believe in the right to life and liberty.Counting votes is an essential component of our democracy.
Posted by: Shawn M. Hussey | April 23, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
The citizens of Florida and Michigan deserve to have their votes counted.They took the time to lawfully participate in their states’ Democratic primaries.In the 2000 election,we heard time and again how Americans’ votes should all be counted.We live in a democratic republic and Americans votes should be counted.I believe in the right to life and liberty.Counting votes is an essential component of our democracy.
Posted by: Shawn M. Hussey | April 23, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
OBAMA’S PHILOSOPHY IS: “DENY AND DESTROY”. Don’t pay for your mistakes. Deny ever hearing or seeing anything. If you don’t want to pay for your mistakes, just get rid of them … or blame someone else!
In 2004, when the Democrats took over, they promised to “unite” our country. Pelosi, Dean and Reid, among others, have done everything in their power to ‘divide’ our country. THEIR MOTTO IS: “DIVIDE AND CONQUER”. They are only interested in their power.
The Democratic Party is destroying our country. We have 48 states … not 50!
UNITED WE STAND — DIVIDED WE FALL!
Posted by: ProudCarolinaGirl | April 23, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Actually, the “abstract measure” is the caucuses. Hillary is right to count Florida and Michigan when talking about what the voters want.
Posted by: april | April 23, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
As usual Obama is telling it like it is and Hillary is reaching for straws. Many people didn’t even vote in FL & MI because they knew it would not count. Sooner or later even Mrs. Clinton will need to follow the Rules. Obama 2008!
Posted by: pt | April 23, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Here is the deal..There are far more moderate Whites, Catholic Latinos, and Asians voting for Hillary than left wingers liberal Whites and Blacks voting for Obama so super delegates Who do you want to vote for your Democratic nominee in the Fall? ..DO THE MATH…
Posted by: Antonn | April 23, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
OBAMASGRANNY: So that we are all clear on just how silly you and other Clinton supporters are, along with Clinton herself, say clearly that you think that it is fair and democratic to give Obama zero votes from Michigan as she is suggesting. Say it so we can all just write you off as a complete nut as more and more informed people do with Clinton every day. SAY IT!!!.
Posted by: whatsaute | April 23, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
The popular vote is a valid measure because the DNC only disqualified the delegates from FL and MI, not the votes. That being said, the Obama camp is correct in that only the delegates count in the determination of the nominee, per the DNC rules. That being said, of course, means that neither Obama or Clinton will have the requisite number of delegates earned from the primaries and the superdelegates votes will be necessary to claim the nomination. And per DNC rules, the superdelegates cast their votes independent of the primaries, which mean that they can vote for whichever candidate they choose, based on independent and individual criteria. Obama is not quaranteed any superdelegate votes just because he has leads in any capacity. The fact that the superdelegate votes matter so greatly suggests very clearly that Obama and Clinton are nearly tied, and the superdelgates will break the tie. That’s why the superdelegates exist.
Posted by: coco paradisio | April 23, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Hillary is desperate and will do anything short of ordering missiles fired from Bosnia to become President. She is on her way out.
Posted by: MikeP | April 23, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
What Obama really means then, is that FL and MI voters are themselves “abstract”. He just does not get it. Sometimes, rules are found to be unjust. A remedy to correct an injustice is then the fair and decent remedy. But Obama adamantly refuses to be fair and decent, so it shows that he himself is an indecent and unfair man.
Posted by: KDH55 | April 23, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
I’m telling you that Hillary is a man baby!
Posted by: Austin | April 23, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
I just saw an article that fits the situation: Obama, the 2nd coming of McGovern!!!
NO TO OBAMA! WE DON’T WANT YOU!!!!
Posted by: Debbie | April 23, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
How many different ways do you need to say it?
Democrats can’t afford to disenfranchise 2.3 million voters and expect to win in November.
The DNC played hardball. They lost. Deal with it!
Posted by: s. valenti | April 23, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
coco paradisio
Exactly…while sadly the vast majority of both camp-supporters soemhow believe their posts alone can change the Rules during the game.
The primary season will play out and a nominee will emerge. I pray all democrats will support either one with the same passion they exhibit here.
RPS1023 delegate 1976
Posted by: rps1023 | April 23, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
I believe it would be unconstitional for anyone to not count my legal vote that I made in Florida. Who has the right to take that away? A presidential candidate? I believe there would be a class action suit if our votes in Florida weren’t counted. P.S. All the names were on the ballot – I suppose if Obama had won the popular vote here, he would support my right to be counted.
Posted by: Bretta | April 23, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Obama spent 3 to 1 over Hillary in PA, and lost by over 2 digits. Now, he wanted Michigan and Florida votes threw under the bus along with his white grandmother. Their votes are just important like any other votes. COUNT THEM IN. GO HILLARY! the proud American all the time.
Posted by: tigerjcs | April 23, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Stan – No, it is not because his is Black. I used to support him and even made monetary donations to his campaign. I stopped supporting him because he will not address the Black Nationalist tone of his Church and some of his own rhetoric.
Posted by: ShelbyBob35051 | April 23, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Well at the end of this thing they are both going to say they won the popular vote so it will be a tie in that aspect. So whats the tie breaked? the Delegates which Obama will have a extremely high count on. This election is over any way you look at it.
Posted by: Sean | April 23, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Well at the end of this thing they are both going to say they won the popular vote so it will be a tie in that aspect. So whats the tie breaked? the Delegates which Obama will have a extremely high count on. This election is over any way you look at it.
Posted by: Sean | April 23, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Obama should quit.
He has been exposed as just a speech maker..with some very bad mentors and friends who hate America.
Hillary may not be perfect…but she is an American who will fight for us everyday.
Posted by: John P. | April 23, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
RPS1023
I will NEVER support Obama if he is the nominee. I care my about my son’s future to put it in the hands of a con man. I will support the McCain campaign if Obama is allowed to be the nominee.
Posted by: Debbie | April 23, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
To all Clinton supporters. After reviewing the exit polls, I have a question. Should we really select the candidate that is favored by the least intelligent, least succesful, least informed, most likely to be senile people in the country or should we try this time to elect a president who is favored by the better educated, better informed, more successful, bright, young and healthy voters? Just a thought.
Posted by: whatsaute | April 23, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
IF THEY DON’T COUNT FL AND MI THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS FINISHED AND MCCAIN WIN IN LANDSLIDE. I GUESS THIS IS WHAT OBAMA CALLS A NEW KIND OF POLITIC’S? ISN’T THAT CALL FACISIM?
Posted by: WPI | April 23, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Florida and Michigan delegates will be seated in convention, this is the fact and everybody knows that. Beside, if super delegates should go with the nominee with more delegates, then what is the purpose of having super delegates in the first place?
The Obama supporters are saying what if Clinton steals the nomination from him, yeh? How about stealing MI & FL from Clinton?
Posted by: Maryam | April 23, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
All the senior voters are WISE. They know a hypocrite when they see one. That is why the seniors will not vote for Obama.
Posted by: mona | April 23, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
robert:
If she didn’t want the votes to count why did she leave her name on the ballot?
Posted by: Dee | April 23, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Hey, OBAMAKNEW, you seem like a typical Clinton voter, maybe you can respond to this: To all Clinton supporters. After reviewing the exit polls, I have a question. Should we really select the candidate that is favored by the least intelligent, least succesful, least informed, most likely to be senile people in the country or should we try this time to elect a president who is favored by the better educated, better informed, more successful, bright, young and healthy voters? Just a thought.
Posted by: whatsaute | April 23, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
whatsaute I see why you support Obama, you are just as arrogant and elitist as Obama. We are all humans and just because someone has more education or money doesn’t make them any better than anyone else. We can’t have a President that doesn’t respect everyone.
By the way, I am a well educated (double master top of my class) executive who supports Clinton. I know that she is the best candidate and will take care of everyone!!!
Posted by: Debbie | April 23, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Hillary is keeping as much dignity as possible given the entire chauvanistic and racist good-guy she’s up against. He talks like someone half his age, plays the role of “I never heard my preacher of 20 years, my role model, say hate-filled words against white Americans and America iteself.” Hillary could certainly use that as a bullseye. And, I don’t recall ever seeing her give the saint Barack the finger during a nationally televised meeting with her supporters, as Barack did and then smiled – and the media let him get away with it! If Barack gets away with taking away hundreds of thousands of Hillary’s votes – well, he just is the Golden Boy, isn’t he. BUT, he’s not a boy, he’s a man who talks like a boy, and plays innocent like a boy and the only real thing he has in common with a boy is inexperience.
Posted by: Tom, Florida | April 23, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Mona,
Thanks for your comment “GOLD”!
Posted by: Maryam | April 23, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Obama’s finally lost it! He’s totally off message and can’t seem to get back on the ball. I can smell the biggest choke in history coming. Eight weeks ago he would not have taken the bait. But after all of the hullaballoo in Pennsylvania, he’s decided to start worrying about process issues. If he doesn’t get back to issues and his message pretty soon, all really will be lost for him.
These two really are a pair! In a year when the Democrats pretty much have a free pass into the White House, these two are working together to ensure that John McCain will be our next President.
I’m sick to death of hearing Obama and HRC supporters defend their people to the death. Neither of these two are even talking about issues any more. This is only good for one person, John McCain.
Posted by: J. T. Bigglesworth | April 23, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Sounds like Clinton is engaging in some
Fuzzy Math…hmmmm where did we hear
that before?
Also, once Oregon votes it will be
all over. This is absolutely Obamaland!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bill is coming here this weekend but
we don’t want him! We’re
suffering from Clinton fatigue already!Turn the page!
Posted by: Reilly | April 23, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
What is Obama disputing? Even with all his money, he couldn’t knock her down. He is already a looser and he will be disqualified by the party and the superdelegates.
Posted by: Josephm | April 23, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
I believe she left her name on the ballot here in Michigan because
1. She KNEW you needed MI and FL to win the White House.
2. To PROVE she believes in changing the process.
3. She was NOT the only Democrat on the ballot here so was Dennis Kucinich, Gravel, and Dodd and also uncommited.
Posted by: Dee | April 23, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Debbie …voting in this country remains by secret ballot…vote for your choice of candidate…however our ballots do not include the reasons why or why not.
Posted by: rps1023 | April 23, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
This whole disenfranchise argument does not hold water. Think about it, just because your primary vote did not count you are gonna vote mc-more-war into office and continue the bush-league policies. Get real, when it comes down to it, people are smarter than that.(Then again this country did put bush/cheney in office twice.) Obama 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | April 23, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
He can’t take the lost.
No matter what he keeps chanting: I win,,I win,,I win,,,
He can say FL & MI are abstract measures but he can not skip it in the G.E
Posted by: crisis08 | April 23, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
The Obama mafia is coming down. He is already humiliating his surrogates, part of his bitterness and frustration.
Black people tend not to live their own reality and like to manipulate the issues. Grow up Barack Obama !!
Posted by: Michelek | April 23, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Bblack:
If you can’t spell AMERICAN, and have noting intellgent to add, than go back to school and learn, before making stupid comments.
Posted by: Dee | April 23, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
DEBBIE, you are right, that was kind of mean. But people arguing that somehow it is acceptable (or worse clearly the only right thing to do) to count votes in such as way as to not give a voice to even one voter in Mich who supports Obama, makes me think those people should not be part of this process. They are insane, and I would argue every bit as wrong as I. Difference here is I apologize for being over zealous and saying silly things. Clinton and her supporters are arguing like mad that their nonsense should be accepted and used a a basis for choosing our next president. Way more troubling.
Posted by: whatsaute | April 23, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Antoin – Now I know who taught O’bama to be evasive. Antoin, if you can’t take the heat get out of the kitchen.
Posted by: ShelbyBob35051 | April 23, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
PT I am one of those who campaigned against Bush but unfortunately people were blind to his deceptive ways and elected him again. That is why I am so against Obama. I see the same thing happening again. People are blind to Obama and the disaster he will bring to this country. I stuck with the Democratic Party last time even though I thought Kerry couldn’t win. This is one time I will be voting for the candidate not the Party affiliation. I will vote Hillary first then McCain then I will write in Edwards or someone else before I would ever support Obama!
Posted by: Debbie | April 23, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Obama is so young and naive he doesn’t see how set up he is by his own party. He either looks like he wants to disenfranchize voters or accept a race he was told not to compete in. Dirty politics is alive and well!
Posted by: Virginia | April 23, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
The way the DNC have ran this primary is embarrassing. By allocating delegates in proportion to the popular vote, the DNC has created this mess. If democrats truly want every vote counted, then we need to do away with the disenfranchising voting system we call a “Caucus”. Of course Obama prefers them to primaries because it suits his core constituents, people who can afford to take 4 to 5 hours out of their day to voice their opinion. This process ignores the idea of one man (woman), one vote. By suggesting that the votes casted in FL and MI are abstract measures is an insult to the voters of those states, and should be an insult to every voting American. Obama elected to take his name off the MI ballot. Every name was on the FL ballot. News coverage in MI and FL did not suddenly cease because they couldn’t campaign there. If Obama truly wants to be the people’s choice for president, then he needs to acknowledge every vote. His way of thinking is exactly like President George W. Bush. Count only the votes that help me win. If he were on the other end of this, he’d be right where Clinton is. If you can’t be fair with voters, how can you be fair to the American people? In addition, these accusations of dirty politics by Obama and the press against Clinton is absurd. Obama’s campaign is just as guilty. They just leave it to the advertisements and the minions to do the attacks. Political battles are all about presenting why you should win and why the other person should not. Pointing out negatives is nothing new, and should not be considered dirty politics. I’m ashamed to be a Democrat at this point. ONE MAN (WOMAN), ONE VOTE! EVERY VOTE SHOULD COUNT!
Posted by: Michael | April 23, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Can someone tell if we have had a candidate to a nomination as hypocritical as Barack Obama. He is becoming disgusting.
Posted by: Rossimass | April 23, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I see Clinton’s hate mongers are working overtime today!
Posted by: Maryam | April 23, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Blah, blah, blah, No one is discussing the issues that will most impact our life in the near and distant future. We just talk about trivia, taken out of context, embellished, exaggerated by a media only concerned with ratings.
Posted by: gc | April 23, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
I am a disenfranchised registered Democrat in Florida. It is upsetting enough to know that the Democratic National Committee and the state of Florida have denied me my right to vote – but here’s a message to Obama – you will learn how “abstract” my vote will be. I could never vote for someone who refuses to fight for my right as an American to vote. I was conflicted about my vote… no longer.
Posted by: allie | April 23, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
If you cant stand the heat, ge ou out of the kitchen. Hillary Clinton connects with the middle class workwers of America. Latinos for Clinton all the way !!!
Posted by: Victor M | April 23, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Wendu said:
“He’s such a hypocritical jerk.”
…and it’s a real shame because Hillary is such an angel…a real sweetheart.
Posted by: me,me,me,me | April 23, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Hillary wins the Pennsylvania primary by 10% and
(according to Obamaites) she’s hurting the party
and prolonging the inevitable. I suggest that Mr.
Obama and his supporters accept losing more gracefully and understand that real Democratic voters just handed him a landslide loss in a state he has to win to be President.
Posted by: andescot | April 23, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Obama is such a baby. If he didn’t have the strong-armed tactics of the caucuses and the cult-like followers who cry at his every word, he would have nothing. I want the strength of action and committment that he hasn’t shown by virtue of his lacks of vote in the senate. Anyway, he is a baby and I hope Hillary just keeps getting tougher on him. He has had a free ride by the media and it is time they just stop it. Even after a win in Pennsylvania, we here more whinning from Obama than anything else. Fight until the end.
Posted by: Kris | April 23, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Hillary Clinton connects with the middle class workers of America. Latinos for Clinton all the way and wealthy voters have changed to Hillary.
Posted by: VictorM | April 23, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
I thought b4 a football game everyone agrees on the rules or they don’t play?
Posted by: chris | April 23, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
whatsaute,
Obama has too many problems. Beside when democrats nominate an unrepentant liberal they lose. Always.
Posted by: Maryam | April 23, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Talk about hypocrisy. Hillary wants to disenfranchise those who live in States that have Caucuses, while including States that violated the rules laid down in advance before Florida and Michigan decided to reschedule their Primaries.
Fact is …there is no “popular vote for all the States decides the nominee” system. And it’s not, contrary to Bill Clinton, winner take all in each State. The Democrats have long had a mix of Primaries and Caucuses based on the proportionate number of Democrats in those States. Iowa gets delegates proportionate to its Democratic numbers.
If Hillary or Bill had a problem with that they could have likely changed the rules back in the 1990′s. Now it’s the onhly way she can possibly win…plus including states that were disqualified where she agreed not to run or accept the results.
And she’s even talking about how it would be okay to poach delegates that are “Committed” to the opposing cadidate in the elections! While all of this “changing rules in the middle of the game” may not be criminal, it’s certainly unethical and a very good reason not to support her.
Sheesh! Bill cheating on her wasn’t “illegal” either…despicable and immoral…yes! But not illegal! What’s with this Family?
Posted by: Jerry | April 23, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
We voted once in Florida. We don’t need to do it again.
Posted by: Neo Politicus | April 23, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Why doesn’t ABC report that the only two states where the Democratic vote total was less than the Republican vote total are Florida and Michigan. Very revealing as to the small turn out by Democratic (and independents in Michigan) voters who knew going in there votes would not count as being in violation of DNC rules.
Posted by: cdp | April 23, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
I am tired of reading the paid Obama people posting here their propaganda.
I watched Hillary and Obama give their speeches. Hillary spoke fresh and from her heart and her love for the people. Obama gave the same inspiration speech that really said nothing. It is the same old speech for the past year. It was good but it is now rusty. Obama needs to connect with the people and stop the Dale Carnegie RaRa speech. America has problems Hillary has solutions and Obama wants to do a RaRa Speech saying nothing really.
GO HILLARY GO. We need you more than ever. Obama better stop playing the dirty race card on President Clinton. Obama is the lowest of the lowest Chicago Politicians. A perfect Phoney.
Posted by: DemocratForever | April 23, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
I don’t really care who created the problems in FL and MI and who supported the decision at the time. It was a huge mistake and should never have been done. (I’ve heard but haven’t investigated it, that there were other states which moved up their primaries but they didn’t get punished by the DNC.) Obama is the one who is now opposing fixing the problem unless he gets an equal portion because he knows that Fl would go in Hillary’s favor and MI is up in the air. It needs to be corrected either based on the results of the primaries which were heard or new primaries which seems unlikely or this year’s nominee won’t be decided until the convention.
I know that if all the information about Obama had been out before the Jan. and Feb. primaries, the other democratic candidates, like Edwards, would have had a better chance at winning the nomination. Shame on the DNC and the media!
Posted by: sarnorton | April 23, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Didn’t this guy collapse already? He is getting tired, but every day he sounds more frustrated and bitter; not like the people in PA, Barack Obama. What a looser !
Posted by: josephm20 | April 23, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Obama’s economy plan sucks! His plans will hurt teachers, firefighter, police officers, etc…
I think that we need to cling to our wallet too!
Posted by: Maryam | April 23, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Why should the national Democratic Party be able to dictate to the states when a state can hold its primary.
Funny how it takes months to hear the whole story even with so many news channels. But when push came to shove the Dem candidates–except Hillary– jumped to the tune of the party leadership and VOLUNTARILY took their names off the Michigan ballot. This was designed to coerce Michigan into having the primary date it was ordered to have–and everyone but Hillary went along with the coercion. Now, I say, tough luck to Obama-He removed his own name to play ball with Dean and Co. Count Michigan’s votes and count Florida’s votes.
Posted by: Deacon John M. Bresnahan | April 23, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Why not simply split the delegates of the states of Florida and Michigan — equally among both candidates? It’s the only solution that makes sense. Both states violated the rules and were duly punished for it. The votes should count for something, however. Giving all the votes to Clinton where Obama was on the ballot in one state and withdrew his name from the other (as did all of the Democrats, including Clinton as per the DNC)would be grossly unfair. (After all, Clinton put her signature to a document, and ala Bush, didn’t honor her own promise.) Were there a revote, the voters would go overwhelmingly for Clinton, as Obama will be seen to have disenfranchised them by not keeping his name on the ballot, when he was simply following party rules. Dividing the delegates is the only way, IMHO. Needless to say, Obama would remain ahead of Clinton, which would have to be borne.
Posted by: SierraBW | April 23, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Double digit lead? Last time I check the results they were Clinton by 9.2
That is double digits, but not the kind your thinking about..
Posted by: Jon | April 23, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Look at the facts as to how strong Hillary is:
Obama lost in Pennsylvannia in spite of endorsement by a Senator and overspending in ads, 5 to 1.
Obama lost in Texas and Ohio even overspending in ads and manipulating info in Ohio.
Obama lost in California even though Oprah, Maria Shriver, and Katherine Kennedy endorsed him.
Obama lost Massachusetts even though Kennedy and John Kerry endorsed him.
Hillary won the big states and has more electoral college votes to date than Obama that is crucial in November.
Obama lost the big states even though the media is most of the time unfair with Hillary and always positive to Obama.
Wake up superdelegates! You will make the right choice if you pick Hillary.
Obama mocked the Pennsylvannians and the entire nation, which is so irresponsible and very degrading to all Americans. He is just like Wright who mocked the Americans and like Rezco and Ayers who we can’t trust.
Wake up superdelegates!
Posted by: Alfredo | April 23, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
The Obama machine (with the support of the far left wing and right wing) continues to spew out mis-information. Florida and Michigan should count, the Obama team has done everything possible to disinfranchis voters. What a shame!
Posted by: Chad | April 23, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
STOP THE BICKERING WE HAVE THE SOLUTION :
CLINTON 2008
OBAMA 2012
OBAMA 2016 (MICHELLE)
CLINTON 2020 (CHELSEA)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WAY TO GO DEMOCRATS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: PeoplePowerPerson | April 23, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
So, if Hilary is going to continue to rattle on about counting all the votes, will she also call for counting all those from the caucuses? You know, from those states she lost?
Posted by: cerebus | April 23, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Obama is dilusional if he thinks MI and FL aren’t going to remember this… Gore lost because of Florida.
Secondly, the more we hear about Obama the more we dislike him.
Posted by: luisa | April 23, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
TO LOUIS – Finally someone who can see the light! I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Posted by: Kim | April 23, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Do you think the voters selected the date to vote…NO, WE DID NOT, but our votes are not to count and Obama is BS; he had ads running like crazy on tv, over and over and over and he LOST…we are hot in Florida and we will cost the dems the election if he is the nominee…remember, it is ELECTORAL VOTES THAT COUNT AND OURS WILL COUNT
Posted by: Angry in Florida | April 23, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Both Florida and Michigan votes were certified by the Sec of States, so they were valid contests. It’s just that their delegates were punished and seen as not being seated. By the way, Obama chose to have his name removed from Michigan. Let’s the face the fact that in order for the DEM party to win in NOV, we need a Clinton-Obama ticket. (If he’s NOT too elitist to accept such a thought.)
Posted by: Darla | April 23, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
It is appalling that Mr. Obama thinks that his political ambitions are more legitimate than the will of the millions of voters who have spoken in Michigan and Florida. Remember what happened the last time we disenfranchised Florida voters and the delegate count trumped the popular vote – that’s right –GEORGE BUSH.
Posted by: smyles | April 23, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
More MATH 101-
There are now 436 Pledged Delegates remaining. If Hillary wins all remaining contests, not likely, but for the sake of argument let’s say she duplicates her win in PA and wins all by 55-45 percent. She nets roughly 40 Pledged Delegates. She is currently behind in pledged delegates by 151 Delegates. On June 4th she would still be behind by 111 Delegates. The facts are this is not a close election. If it was she should catch him by winning 10 straight contests. If it is such a close contest why can’t she close the deal and catch him. And BTW that is a best case scenario for her. She is not going to win North Carolina or Oregon.
Futhermore, there are about 300 Undeclared Super Delegates remaining. Even if she won as suggested above. She would need rough 210 out of the remaining 300 superdelegates to GIVE her the nomination. And remember that is with her winning the remaining contests, which is not likely. I also suspect come June 3rd the pool of undeclared superdelegates will be much smaller. Conversely, Obama only will need about 85 of the current pool of undeclared superdelegates to break his way to win the nomination.
One further note. Obama will be leading in Pledged Delegates on June 4th and more than likely the popular vote from DNC sanctioned contests. Even if Hillary is successful in raising doubts about Obama with Superdelegates, The Convention WILL NOT Destroy the party by giving Hillary the nomination with Obama leading in all VALID Metrics. The only option that we will be available will be for Al Gore to step forward and rescue the party. So you see, it’s over for Hillary. Either Barack Obama will be at the top of the ticket come this fall. Or Al Gore will be at the top with Obama on the bottom.
Posted by: Kaiser | April 23, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Do all the math you like and follow what rules you like, but if you insult and disinfranchise 3 million voters, if you continue to insult the base of this party, winning will be pointless. Winning this nomination is NOT the goal here. Fielding a candidate who can win is. Lose sight of that, and everyone loses.
Posted by: drae | April 23, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
The popular vote is going for Obama even if you count Florida and Michigan. He has won heavily in all of the caucus states, so unless you are going to not count the voters from Iowa, Nevada, American Samoa, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, North Dakota, and half of Texas voters (all except Nevada won by Obama) the popular vote is clearly breaking in his favor.
Posted by: Brian | April 23, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
I’m sorry. Did I miss something? When was it that Senator Obama made the decision to move up the FL and MI primaries??? Oh, that’s right…HE DIDN’T! If FL and MI were so concerned about their votes counting, why did they chose to move their primaries up? They knew what the penalty would be. IDIOTS! Now they are whining that their voices have not been heard. Well I say it serves them right. Quit blaming it on Obama! But I guess we should all remember that the rules don’t apply to the Clintons. They make up their own rules as they go along to suit their needs.
Posted by: Kim | April 23, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Abstact? Are you sure Sen. Obama?
You keep on talking like this, and we all know that come November, if you are annointed as the Dem. superhero, both Florida and Michigan voters won’t be so abstract.
I was supporting you in the beginning, but as more times goes by, you have proved to be one of the worst Dems to run for office. Even GW, for all his faults, has a backbone!
You must be shaken up, after the double-digit, resounding defeat, yesterday.
Jeeeez!
Posted by: Texas-Politico | April 23, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
it totally amazes me that after the oddities that happened here in florida to put gwb in office that the presumptive candidate thinks he can dismiss florida – i can imagine if he is the nominee the moment when he realizes that florida just decided that he was ‘abstract’ and that once again florida has the last word !
Posted by: scathinglybrilliant | April 23, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
I wonder how the voter’s in FL and MI feel? Obama’s attorneys killed their attempts to revote…and now he’s making it clear that their votes don’t even reflect people but are abstract.
There will definitely be changes in politics in the future, but I don’t think we’ve moved in 8 years to a place where we are going to punish 2 states and hope they come home to the fold in November.
There are bound to be thousands of voters in both states mad at the successful attempts to close them down.
Mr Obama’s 48 state stategy is a real reach…I have a friend in FL that insists this is a big story there, that lots of FL voter’s are going to vote McCain if they are disregarded….
Like everything in this election I will have to research it…no one tells the story if it doesn’t favor Obama/
Posted by: Jackie | April 23, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
And here I thought the Dems had a 50-state strategy.
Did Florida and Michigan secede from the U.S.? If Obama and Howard Dean are comfortable with disenfranchising the voters of two states now, will they be able to win without them in November?
It’s stuff like this that make me proud that I am no longer a Democrat.
Posted by: cajuncocoa | April 23, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Has anyone told Obama he can’t win without superdelegates…I guess it’s whine time for Obama…
Why can’t he just let the votes count?…What is he afraid of? Clinton is right he can’t close the deal and he knows it.
Posted by: Jackie | April 23, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Go Democrats go I thought the republicans had no chance now I see hope.
Posted by: Binafus | April 23, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
I believe it is time Obama begins to remind the small delegate states with the sound bites over the national news, that Hillary said the small states don’t count. I believe the small state members should remember this when they vote for Obama and not Clinton. Yes we do count! Clinton is not going to change anything, please America, she is tired to close to her husband and is owing to Corporate American and not the people of the country who are in need of change.
Posted by: James Wiegand | April 23, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN:
Do you want to elect a president who thinks you are non-existent?
Do you want to elect a president who is trying to disfranchise the millions in FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN?
Do you want to elect someone who defends his anti-American racist pastor?
Do you want to entrust this great nation’s reign to someone who exploits race to win elections whenever it is convenient?
Do you want to elect a president who is “all talk” and “no action”?
Do you want to elect a president whom we do not know?
If you answered YES, you have a choice: vote for Obama
Posted by: Independent | April 23, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
I realize that caucus votes do not count toward the popular vote count, however I don’t that that is is honest to say that more people have voted for Hillary when you are not counting the large amount of people that turned out in caucus states. It seems saying that the count that matters is a count that ignores Iowa, Nevada, American Samoa, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, North Dakota, and half of Texas voters, runs a much higher risk of disenfranchising voters than not counting Florida and Michigan.
Posted by: Brian | April 23, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Here’s the bottom line: I hate to say this, but I think it’s more likely than not now that regardless of who the dem nominee is this fall, dems will lose the general election in January. People feel so strongly and loyal to either Obama or Hillary that whoever is the dem nominee, a large percent of voters from the other dem candidate will either angrily vote for McCain or not vote. If Obama and Hillary don’t get on the same ticket, the dems will lose again next year. If that happens, I think I’m going to move to Canada.
Posted by: Jake | April 23, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
It smacks of “entitlement” to demand that the nomination be given to whoever is ahead…
So far the attorneys are winning…Obama shut down revotes in FL and MI…these chickens may not be coming home to vote if they ever get a chance.
After all the new sign ups in the Democratic party is it wise to throw out FL and MI. Count the votes!
Is Obama now saying that older voters are A problem for him since his numbers slipped dramatically in college educated voters? He is devisive and deceptive…And some of us hear him.
Posted by: Jackie | April 23, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
To Kim:
The Republican Governor in Florida decided to move up the primaries. The democrats in both Fl/MI just bought into that idea, and neither Clinton or Obama could have interfered politically (as it is a STATE matter. The Republicans (Gov. Crist/Fl.) played a cool hand.
But the harm done to the party came from no other than Howard Dean and two other Dem. big shots in the party high command.
They were the ones who drew the line on the sand for MI/Fl – that is dictating of you move up, we won’ count you.
Basic principles of management tells us that you DO NOT set a punishment bar so high, that your whole company capitulated or is done great harm.
Dean basically grounded both FL/MI for 4 years because they were naughty. The shame is on Dean and his pals who made the biggest mess.
Both FL/MI voters cannot be disenfranchised for stupid reasons like this. Those voters must be counted if the Dem. stand a any chance in winning the WH in Nov.
Thats basially it.
Posted by: Texas-Politico | April 23, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Funny to see Democrats that usually say the republicans as cheaters and do anything to win while thinking they are morally better drag each other around in the mub and say the other side is not fair.
You guys need to come to the republican side McCain will be a good president vs what you ended up with this year.
Posted by: Binafus | April 23, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Reality = Obama was able to reduce a 25% lead by Clinton in the polls to a 10% margin of victory (in a state that was ideal for Clinton in terms of demographics).
Reality = Abstract notions like “momentum” don’t mean much at this point. Statisticians have already determined that it is impossible for Clinton to catch up to Obama in delegates won between now and the convention.
Reality = There’s no way the superdelegates are going to steal the nomination from the candidate with the most delegates won at the time of the convention. Why? That would be undemocratic. It would destroy the Democratic Party’s reputation (revealing hypocrisy). It would likely force masses of Obama supporters to either not vote in the general election or vote for McCain.
Reality = the only way Hillary Clinton will be able to get the superdelegates to steal/overturn Obama’s lead at convention time, is through a Tanya Harding approach. The Clintons have already made the dirtiest plays one could easily conceive of and it has not worked to date (e.g., make Obama out to be anti-American, play the race card, associate Obama with controversial figures or with Islamic religion or Bin Laden himself).
As solid a Democrat as I am, I would personally NEVER, EVER vote someone into office who would so relentlessly pursue personal gain/glory that she would attempt to destroy another person along the way. And let’s be clear, Obama is and has always been the underdog in this race. The Clintons consider themselves the icons of the Democratic party and they are extremely connected and advantaged when it comes to garnering support of superdelegates and utilizing relationships for favors, etc., concerning campaign activities. Barack Obama has overcome unbelievable odds in maintaining his lead despite all of the advantages that Clinton has had. He and his supporters deserve every ounce of credit for what they have achieved and what he is likely to achieve in the end—the nomination and the presidency.
One last note: The Clinton camp seems to be working very hard to promote phony arguments about her ability to win in the general election due to a demonstrated ability to win the larger states. Do not be fooled. The Clinton campaign spreads these ideas while knowing full well that there is no genuine parallel between (a) a democratic candidate’s ability to win larger states when running against another democrat in a democratic nomination process and (b) a democratic nominee’s ability to win larger states when running against a republican in the general election. (It’s easy to look back at previous contests and see that this just isn’t true.) People who win particular states during party nominee contests often don’t win the same states in the general election. It’s a phony argument. Yet many voters buy into it, unfortunately.
As Obama has said repeatedly, Clinton has every right to continue to compete all the way to the convention. But she’s doing this for selfish reasons and she’s willingly putting our party’s chances of winning the white house (and getting our troops home) at great risk.
Mike Denhof, PhD
Posted by: Mike Denhof | April 23, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Hillary thinking about what works…Most pledge delegates? Nope. Most states? Nope. Most caucus states? Nope. Most in the popular vote? Nope.
Wait! Most popular votes if we count votes in states where we agreed not to campaign, plus votes in a state where the other guy was not on the ballot and we won’t count uncommitted as votes for him, and not count caucus states because they are not popular votes.
Yes that’s rational thinking. Do you really want a president that thinks that the American people are that stupid. Really, get a grip on reality, it’s over.
On to McCain.
Posted by: Sanity Man | April 23, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Kaiser: You have made your point. My final grading for you would be 2.44. Feel free to protest against the MSM’s percentage reporting, if that makes you happy about Obama’s loss.
Posted by: Vickie | April 23, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Why is all the blame for FL & MI being placed on Obama? Hillary also agreed in the beginning with the DNC’s decision to disallow their votes, but now that she needs those votes she wants them to count. It’s your states that are to blame and you should direct your voting to those people in office who made the decision against the warning of the DNC to not change their primary dates. And what kind of democracy would that be to let her have the votes count of the people who voted for her when she was the only one on the ballot?
And another thing, Hillary keeps asking why can’t Obama close the deal. If she really wants an answer to that question all she has to do is come to boards like this and read what a lot of her racist friends are saying.
Any body know what time she has to be in court on her fraud case this week?
Posted by: Caddycts | April 23, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
To Louis: good work. I can’t help but laugh when Hillary supporters keep talking about Florida and Michigan and when they call Obama a hypocrite.
It is clear in my mind who has been the hypocrite: Hillary Rodham Clinton, but I’ve written enough on all these message boards about why, now I’m exhausted…read Louis’ post. But most obvious point, Hillary said the votes in Michigan and Florida don’t when all this started and now they must must must count…ouff I’m tired of trying to explain everything to you people.
Hillary Clinton is no longer a Democrat anyway, she has used the fear tactics of Republicans, starting with the 3 am call ad in Ohio, the Obama is not ready argument, the Farrakhan, Ayres, and Wright references to SCARE WHITE PEOPLE, the use of Osama bin Laden, the comment on obliterating Iran…and on and on…
You know, if this country just wants to elect dynasties and never change by electing people who are too sucked in the Washington psyche, then welcome back 9/11…it is time for a revolution and that revolution will only happen with Obama!
Adios
Posted by: Anthony | April 23, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
To Louis: good work. I can’t help but laugh when Hillary supporters keep talking about Florida and Michigan and when they call Obama a hypocrite.
It is clear in my mind who has been the hypocrite: Hillary Rodham Clinton, but I’ve written enough on all these message boards about why, now I’m exhausted…read Louis’ post. But most obvious point, Hillary said the votes in Michigan and Florida don’t when all this started and now they must must must count…ouff I’m tired of trying to explain everything to you people.
Hillary Clinton is no longer a Democrat anyway, she has used the fear tactics of Republicans, starting with the 3 am call ad in Ohio, the Obama is not ready argument, the Farrakhan, Ayres, and Wright references to SCARE WHITE PEOPLE, the use of Osama bin Laden, the comment on obliterating Iran…and on and on…
You know, if this country just wants to elect dynasties and never change by electing people who are too sucked in the Washington psyche, then welcome back 9/11…it is time for a revolution and that revolution will only happen with Obama!
Adios
Posted by: Anthony | April 23, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
There are people who will not vote for Obama now that support Hillary.
There are people who will not vote for Hillary that support Obama.
These numbers are growing.
Some say put them on the same ticket.
But there are some people who won’t vote for a female and some won’t vote for a black person so you put them together it causes more problems.
Posted by: Binafus | April 23, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
The problem with the popular vote is that it cannot be counted!!!! States that run caucuses do not count every single voter, so 4 or 5 states do not have voter tallies. Also PA. did not allow independents to vote, thus resulting in the 10 point win… Independent votes would have made the election around 5% difference, people need to look at all the facts before jumping to conclusions. Again the Clinton Team is twisting the facts.
Posted by: Wags | April 23, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Actually, caucus voters are usually counted. In four states, an official count was not released, and therefore, sites like RealClearPolitics, and the other news sites all rely on estimates.
Considering the fact that caucus voters are those who can blow half a DAY to vote in a primary, they really don’t represent the “will of the people” anyhow. Look at Texas. The VOTE went to clinton, but the caucus went for Obama. Caucuses reveal the will of the hardcore activists, not the people of the country. Frankly, I think caucuses should be scrapped. Notice that when we go into other countries, and help them set up democracies, we never recommend caucuses.
Seriously. I have a job. I can find time to vote, but sure as heck cannot spend 5 hours at a caucus.
Posted by: southerner | April 23, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
the question should be: why isn’t Hillary closing the deal? After all, she has the name recognition, HAD the money and was way, way ahead 15 months ago. And, gasp, she’s white!!
Posted by: Integrity First | April 23, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
If the situation was reversed and Clinton was ahead like Obama is now, I wonder what she would say? She would probably complain and cry like she’s done this whole election season and call foul.
Posted by: AD | April 23, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Just remember that the dogs may bark but the caravan will roll on through. Eventually the Dem voters will realize that even if their candidate doesn’t win, they are better off with the other dem than with McCain.
Posted by: Jack | April 23, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Why are the press pandering so much to the Clintons the last few days? ALL of the cable networks. As an observer from another country I would advise Americans to question their press. These blogs give an outsider a real view into the American mind – and I’m sorry to say, it’s not pretty.
Posted by: Sharon | April 23, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Bottem line; Florida needs to be counted. Michigan needs redone.
Posted by: KURT | April 23, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Clinton gains 10 delegates, BUT TAKE NOTE OBAMA’s delegate count just got alot closer to 2025 with his gains!!! Can someone tell me what she actually won???
Posted by: Wags | April 23, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Really don’t care one way or another. Like watching the dems destroy their chances time and again. Wasn’t there an article recently about the hidden doubts pertaining to Obama and his bases’ similarity to that of George McGovern? (For those of you not old enough to know, look it up) As far as Obama garnering the nomination, maybe he will, who really knows. But other than standing on the sidelines shouting unfair, is his base really up to the challenge of defending against a. his wife’s idiotic statement of no pride in her country, b. his minister’s (well no need to go into that now is there), and c. his own misstep in San Francisco wherein he alienated a huge part of the democratic base. If you think the heat in the kitchen is hot not, just wait until the real election begins. jmo
Posted by: michael | April 23, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Alice
PA is the center of the world…the glorius site of Obama’s undoing.
LONG LIVE PA !!
Posted by: Steven | April 23, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
You can’t go by the popular vote and everyone should know it. Some caucus states don’t even record the popular vote and Obama won most caucus states. It’s as simple as that.
Regards, The Old Prospector
Posted by: Prospector44 | April 23, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
What you think? Is he right? Are the we the voters of Florida and Michigan just Abstract individuals? Judge for yourselves.
Sincerely faithful viewer of ABC News.
Chuck Stoddard
Posted by: Chuck Stoddard | April 23, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Obama needs to quit talking to voters as if they are intelligent adults that can comphrehend what he is saying. He needs to start using the political “baby talk” that his opponent is using. People to do not want to hear the truth and they certainly do not want to be challenged that they have to acutally participate to make things better. They want to be lied to.
Obama is the opposite of an elitist. An elitist talks to people like they are idiots and creates they illusion that they are not.
Posted by: Mike | April 23, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
WHOSE FAULT IS IT? Many Obama supporters cannot face the truth about their candidate, period. They began supporting him when they knew nothing about him, and now that they’ve invested so much of themselves in the “change” he pretended to represent, there is just no turning back for them. No, they will not let information which does not support their image of this man intrude upon their dreams. I blame Obama for this, more than his supporters. He knew he was perpetrating a terrible hoax on the voters of this country from the start. He knew the kinds of ruthless tactic Many Obama supporters cannot face the truth about their candidate, period. They began supporting him when they knew nothing about him, and now that they’ve invested so much of themselves in the “change” he pretended to represent, there is just no turning back for them. No, they will not let information which does not support their image of this man intrude upon their dreams. I blame Obama for this, more than his supporters. He knew he was perpetrating a terrible hoax on the voters of this country from the start. He knew the kinds of ruthless tactics he had used from the beginning to jumpstart his political career. He knew about his dubious associations and how they flew in the face of his calls for “change” and “unification.” He knew about the racist theology to which he subscribed for 20 years, and how destructive such ideas are to the progress of race relations in this country. No, I do not place primary blame for our current unfortunate situation on his supporters; I place it squarely on Obama, who has shown an almost criminal lack of concern about the damage his tactics have done not only to the Democratic Party, but more importantly, to relations between the races about which, ironically, he professes to care so much.
Posted by: Fred | April 23, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Robert: Before you get to carried away with attacks on OBAMA and is hear say relationships. I have not forgot the Clintons history in Arkansas Real Estate dealing and other business issues resulting in some people being no longer on this earth, I would watch where I step and look back farther than the 1990′s in the Clintons pathways.
Posted by: Wags | April 23, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
I’m sure that the millions of voters in MI and FL are happy to hear that they are just ‘abstract’ to Obama instead of being REAL PEOPLE.
I guess the ‘change’ he brings to MI and FL is disenfranchisement.
Why does he hate Michigan and Florida?
Posted by: Evie | April 23, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
If the situation was reversed and Clinton was ahead like Obama is now, I wonder what she would say? She would probably complain and cry like she’s done this whole election season and call foul.
Posted by: AD | April 23, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Steven “I have been to PA. and it AIN’T ALL THAT” that’s why I moved…
Posted by: Wags | April 23, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
This election is a complete fiasco and shows a need for serious change in the process. Proportional awarding of delegates needs to be scrapped – or at least curtailed – and caucuses need to go. Someone with as thin a resume as Obama’s should not have gotten this far – it’s embarassing to the Party and a real travesty.
Posted by: K.F. Miller | April 23, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Every state party and electorate chooses their nominating process. Caucuses have never made much sense, but in the heavy repub. western states they work (sort of) because there is such a small number of dems there. In this election, they became a joke in more ways than one, for both sides.
As to Florida and MI, these people voted. Voted at the polls and the elections were certified by the state. The DNC chose to punish two states out of five by refusing to seat the delegates, but the votes have to count. I understand the issues with MI, but there is no basis to not count Florida as it stands.
In addition, it was Obama and his staff that would not agree to a revote. Are rules and arbitrary punishments really more important than the voters of these two states? Swing States!?
What are we thinking that we have leaders that have allowed this, and that we have a candidate who is more than willing to just ignore them because it doesn’t help his cause. He could have turned a revote into a real plus for his side, but instead he has angered 3 million democrats.
How in God’s name does that make sense?
You are wrong, people will vote for McCain over Obama. We have seen him work for years, many times siding with dems over his own party. He IS a man who can cross aisles. He does more than say it, he has a history of it. Some things will have to be put off, but then we are used to that too.
People matter! Voters matter! Character matters!
Posted by: drae | April 23, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Don’t go there Obama! Your loosing support by the minute.
Posted by: Cara | April 23, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Facts are facts, with Florida and MI, Clinton is ahead of obama in popular vote now by about 200,000 votes! Its funny how the news media/CNN and obama’s supporters keep saying the democratic party is not counting FL and MI votes, even though the DNC party leader Dean said he would. But even funnier, is the fact that the DEMS will NEED FL and MI in NOV to have even a small chance of winning the presidency. I bet they would want them to count then! If our votes are not included as individuals in the nomination process, dont come ask for them in NOVEMBER! Mark, FL
Posted by: Mark | April 23, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
One last thing…do you really think the Republicans are going to let a little thing like Obama’s affiliation with William Ayers simply rest on the sidelines during the general election?
Posted by: michael | April 23, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
With all the talk about Obama’s support among African-Americans, young voters, and liberal elites, why does no one consider what will happen if he loses Hillary’s base to McCain? You know, women, blue collar workers, Catholics, Jews, Hispanics, long-time Dems, gun-owners, bowlers, older voters, Florida, and Michigan. I guess they’re just ‘abstract’ to Obama, too.
If he continues to take all these groups for granted, he will lose. BIG.
Posted by: Misty | April 23, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
According to Senator Obama my vote doesn’t count because I live in Michigan. I find that very disturbing.
Posted by: RRRD73A | April 23, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
WE WOULD BE HAVING A REVOTE ON JUNE 3RD IN MICHIGAN IF IT WERENT FOR OBAMA..
HE WANTS TO GET A CHANCE TO WIN UTAH IDAHO AND MONTANA THAT HE KNOWS MCCAIN WILL TAKE..
DONT HAVE WHAT IT TAKES TO CLOSE THE DEAL
$50 MILLION LATER, OBAMA LOST BY DOUBLE-DIGIT.
Posted by: TJ | April 23, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
I live in Michigan, and I wanted to vote for Obama but voted as “uncommitted”. With what Hillary said today where is my vote counted? Anyone want to answer that?
Posted by: Sanity Man | April 23, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Abstract people, bitter people. When will Obama ever learn. You can’t slam the voters and think they won’t notice. I guess that elitist tend to think that way.
Posted by: Jeff | April 23, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
VOTERS OBAMA CANT HAVE ARE EITHER ‘BITTER” OR “ABSTRACT.”
Posted by: TJ | April 23, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Obama is NOT ahead in the popular vote, Hilary is. Obama is only ahead in that sub-set of the popular vote the DNC has decided to recognize, but there is nothing in the DNC rules that says that the DNC must reject MI & FL delegates.
To win the nomination outright either candidate needed to collect 2,025 delegates. Neither will, so a possible outcome?
Hilary will have more of the popular vote (if we include votes from MI + FL) and there is not reason we shouldn’t.
Barack will have more actual delegates (but not the needed 2,025).
The voters in two key states (MI + FL) will have been disenfranchised.
As a MI voter, who is resigned to not having his voted counted, I shall be perfectly content if all of the rest of you in the other states also have your votes ignored.
Let the super delegates decide, and let the chips fall where they may!
:-)
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Obama’ supporters in MI told voters to fill in uncommitted. Why would they do so if they didn’t expect an issue would come up? Why block a revote? Why?
Posted by: drae | April 23, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
We’ve had enough of these old corrupt polititions cheating, changing the rules, bribing and lieing. The democratic party should step in and make Hillary and Bill shut up and play by the rules. They are making the Unuted States look like a bunch of corrupt gangsters. Hillary Clinton is like Robert Mugabie, she loses the election so she changes the rules. Is this the way the United States works?
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Shame.. for shame on anyone that would deny counting the vote of any state! Any attempt to deny a citizens vote, is an assault on democracy itself. The very foundation of this country is being attacked. The common thread that binds all of us together is this very principle!
Posted by: JDinPA | April 23, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Ummm…professors can spell ‘fantacy’ correctly–even in Indiana (it’s fantasy).
I’m most interested why all the shrill attacks on Obama come from women.
I’d be willing to bet most are over the age of 45. If there’s an over-50 candidate qualified in this race, it’s McCain. Hillary can’t get her stories straight (let alone her home states–>she has claimed Arkansas, Pennsylvania, Illinois, and New York).
Posted by: jim | April 23, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
FLORIDA SHOULD COUNT ‘AS IS’ THE PLAYING FIELD IS EVEN IN FLORIDA. THERE SHOULD BE A REVOTE IN MICHIGAN. IT WAS SET FOR JUNE 3RD AND OBAMA BLOCKED IT…
WHY DID OBAMA AND HIS CON MEN BLOCK THE REVOTE IN MICHIGAN..HE MIGHT HAVE WON
Posted by: TJ | April 23, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
1 more reason obama should not be president. He can not count! This guys is suppost to be running on a ticket of honesty, but he picks and chooses to distort reality. Same old politics of the past and he is NO DIFFERENT!
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Man you people in MI and FL must be ignorant because it was not Obama who said your votes don’t count, but the DNC. If your moronic party leaders played by the rules then this would not be an issue as rules were agreed to by all, but your folks decided to change the rules regardless of the penalities.
Even HRC agreed to the rules, but like she always does, now she wants to change the rules to make her case.
Posted by: jozy | April 23, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
drae said: Obama’ supporters in MI told voters to fill in uncommitted. Why would they do so if they didn’t expect an issue would come up? Why block a revote? Why?
I agree. OBAMA BLOCKS THE REVOTE, BECAUSE HIS OWN UNBRIDLED AMBITION IS MORE IMPORTANT TO HIM THAN THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS. That along should give us all pause.
Posted by: Fred | April 23, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Obama didn’t block a vote in Michigan. There were several problems. No one wanted to pay for it except for a group of Hillary supporters which would have made it seem unfair. We could have piggy backed onto a school funding election in May but school boards did not want a lot of voters showing up because they only want student parents showing up. The county clerks said that they could not have a vote by June 3 since they would not have enough time after the May school funding election. I live in Michigan and keep current on this. I’m very frustrated but it is not Hillary’s nor Obama’s fault.
Posted by: Sanity Man | April 23, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Even if you do not count the delegates of florida and michigan, the numbers of voters there still count – afterall, they voted fair and square.
And you had better believe that voters in florida and michigan will count in the general election.
Looks like we’re going to get 4 years of Mccain if obama gets the nomination.
Posted by: Jon | April 23, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
The more I learn about Obama, the more I support Hillary.
Posted by: Hobart Cavanaugh | April 23, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
JDinPA
Ah so you know how to count a vote in Michigan by what Hillary said today? Please explain.
Posted by: Sanity Man | April 23, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
The answer, EVIE, is Obama doesn’t hate the voters of Florida and Michigan; BUT, Obama’s own internal polling, (and he can afford the best polling in the business), is telling his campaign that if there WERE a re-vote in Florida and Michigan, he would with high probability take significant loses in both states. There is only downside for his campaign in having re-votes. So, OF COURSE, the Obama campaign is trying to stall any effort to have a re-vote.
But, honestly, the Obama campaign is just whistling a happy tune if they think the convention is going to roll around without this issue being definitively resolved beforehand.
Who was it above that said, “You can run, but you can’t hide”?.. Indeed!
Posted by: Scott | April 23, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Obama took his name off the MI ballot, but even if you give him all the uncommited delegates/votes, Clinton still beat him by a landslide. Thats why obama didnt want a revote in MI. He knows he would loose!
Posted by: tyroninMichigan | April 23, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
James at 9:47, I agree. Let the Fla vote stand even though it was not a contested race. The repubs gave FLA half their delegates, dems should do the same. Re-vote in Michigan with both candidates on the ballot. Fla. repub-controlled legislature will not allow a re-vote; will Michigan?
Posted by: Don | April 23, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
I’ve started to look at Obama differently after the past several weeks. Now I really do wonder why he doesn’t want MI & FL to vote. If he doesn’t have a problem doing that to some people what would make me think he won’t eventually do it to me (i.e. health care).
Posted by: Jack | April 23, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
If the vote count in FL and MI is counted in this “mythical” popular vote metric, then it is only fair to assume that the caucuses fairly represented the will of the registered Dem.s in the caucus states. I say we apply the caucus vote percentages to the total registered Dem. voters in those states and ADD those “votes” to the popular vote totals for both candidates. The popular vote count trends would then match the delegate count. That is more “meaningful” than the current Clintonista accounting.
In the end, it is ALL about delegates, and if the Clinton’s steal this thing from Obama, Denver 2008 will make Chicago 1968 look like a garden party.
Posted by: Binger | April 23, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
The General election will be about the “Big 3″ states: Philadelphia, Florida and Ohio. The networks will be looking closely the results of these 3 states….Because, since after JFK, all Presidents won at least 2 of these states and historically, no Republican has won without winning Ohio…..
So with this theory, Hillary having a better record than Obama in those states should be the smartest bet for the Democrats…As for Obama, he should just go home and eat all his waffles..
Posted by: Jerome | April 23, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Why has obama started crying about everything? I guess its better to complain instead of giving solutions to problems. 2nd, why can obama not answer questions? He always wants to give a “speach” the next day… Seems like someone else is running the lights up there! I dont trust him…
Posted by: latisha/ NC | April 23, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
there will always be cheaters in this world. rules are rules….
I am started to wonder why this party is called democratic party. After all it has a lot in common with the Mugabe’s party in Zimbabwe
Posted by: leche | April 23, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Why has obama started crying about everything? I guess its better to complain instead of giving solutions to problems. 2nd, why can obama not answer questions? He always wants to give a “speach” the next day… Seems like someone else is running the lights up there! I dont trust him…
Posted by: latisha/ NC | April 23, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Let’s get real!!!!
If Obama doesn’t get the nomination – Mc Cain will win in November. Why?
Because the tens of thousands of new voters Obama inspired to join the process will not come out and vote for the same old politics. If Hillary gets the nomination in November it will be the Clinton haters and the republicans
vs the old established democratic base minus the black vote. It will be a done deal.
Posted by: Cari | April 23, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Obomba, Baby, you just go ahead and eat your waffle and let the grownups do the counting and run for President, all right, Honey?
Posted by: xbjllb | April 23, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
“He can’t win the big states, he can’t win the swing states” Blah, blah. If Hillary’s so strong, tell me why doesn’t she have more delegates and popular votes? Yes popular vote…because what Hillary DIDN’T tell you is, even if you add FL and MI…Obama is still ahead by more than 100,000 votes. She just neglected to tell everyone that in MI, she only counted the votes she got and gave NONE to Obama. This from the woman who says she was under sniper fire in Bosnia. How can we believe anything she or her husband says? They are big liars and CRAZY!!! If she’s stronger and the tide has turned as she said, then I expect her to win ALL of the remaining contests.
Posted by: Big C | April 23, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Latisha: Very astute comment. Obama does have a real problem when he is not reading his speeches from a teleprompter. When the Rev. Wright issue blew up, he should have had a press conference and let the reporters ask him questions about the incident. Instead, he gives a written speech. He gives very few press conferences, I believe, because he is nervous about the question which may be asked. Remember the last one, where the reporters started asking him questions that disturbed him, and he called it off after only 8 questions. Is this really the type of person we want as our President? I don’t think so.
Posted by: Fred | April 23, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
I’m not “bitter”….I’m not “abstract”…I’m not “old”…Obama just doesn’t get it. I am a voter.
And if Obama silences my voice I hope the super delegates will listen.
It’s not about race or demographics at all…..it is about the fact that over 50% of the voters in this nomination process want to be heard. COUNT ALL THE VOTES because the VOTES ARE NOT ABSTRACT! It’s not over yet!
Hillary is Rising and Obama is whining!
Posted by: Jackie | April 23, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I am for Obama but you know what I don’t give a damn who is leading the popular vote.What a bout the price od gas,loaf of bread heating oil.Come on lets get down to the nitty gritty here and do some talkig about the United States the war the illegal people here the banks getting help from the government the price of medicine,health care go for the basics,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Posted by: h | April 23, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Obama is such a hypocrite. Nothing else to say —- He is as stupid as an old crazy uncle!!! Wasn’t that his line when referring to Wright?
Posted by: David | April 23, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Based on how poorly he did in the last debate I am really concerned about Obama’s electibility. He just doesn’t portray himself as very presidential. The whole flipping the bird thing was really immature.
Posted by: Condi | April 23, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Louis – You are right on. The old adage i that we deserve the government we get is absolutely true. Hillary and Bill are ruthless, cut throat politicians. They will destroy anyone who crosses their path. Hillary deserves to be President. All that sniper fire she survived for us makes her entitled.
Posted by: Gretchenmom | April 23, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Obama’s serious limitations are obvious. Pledged delegates are only political promises, not legal commitments. SD’s will come back to Clinton in 2nd week of May. In June, she’ll take the nom, in Nov. the GE. Obama concedes, serves in Senate, beefs up, attempts another run in 2012/2016.
Posted by: Carlos | April 23, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
I vote Hillary Clinton to be CFO of a new Enron. The way she claims to have more popular votes (including Florida & Michigan after these 2 states were banned by her party and after all Democratic candidate agreed to pull ou ot them)! This creative vote counting method of Hillary RIVALS Enron’s ex-CFO Andrew Fastow.
Posted by: ablanche08 | April 23, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
CATHOLICS TELL ALOTS ABOUT THEIR RELIGION. VOTED FOR THE MOST DISHONEST PERSON TO EVER RUN FOR PRESIDENT. PA IS A JOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: READY999 | April 23, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
But I think Obama is Honest, and Hillary cant be Trusted!
Posted by: Carlos | April 23, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
He’s becoming more of a joke every day. He’s the one who should drop out, I’ve lost every bit of respect I had for him at the beginning of this campaign. He says one thing, then proceeds to do another, then blames it on Hillary or someone else. Guess Harvard Law School doesn’t teach Responsibility 101. (P.S. I’m sick of hearing about all of the new voters he brought out…most of them are either college students who don’t have a clue about real problems in the real world yet, independents/Republicans who want him to run against McCain as he is the weaker candidate,or people voting for him because it is the cool thing to do right now.) These voters will disappear after this election, whether he wins or not.
Posted by: Ed | April 23, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
I would like to add.
On Rev Wright, Who among us doesn’t have a relationship with a person that spouts views we don’t believe in. (Fathers, Mothers, boss, friends, etc..)
Are you them? do you make decisions that they make or do you make your own? Do or have you separated yourself from them?
On Trust, I wish that Madeline Albright was the other contestant. I wish the first serious female candidate was worthy of my respect. In my world trust is an important thing. Maybe the most important. I can’t say I trust either candidate, but one is obviously lies more.
On the election, It was hard for me to vote for certain candidates in the past, the one I supported didn’t make it to the top. I think it is like the two mothers fighting over the baby, the king offers to cut it in half and the baby will die. The real mother relents to save the babies life. In this election the Real candidate will stop killing the other with attacks and just be. Win or Lose this will save the party.
On Pennsylvania,
In what world does anyone say that our team scored more points in a single quarter or period, therefore, even though behind in total points, they win?
Posted by: Dan | April 23, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
To a large extent, Hillary has been winning minus the black vote, as it is.
Posted by: Scott | April 23, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Hillary Clinton supporters have lost their minds.
NONE of their names shOuld have been on the ballot in either FL or MI. You want to be mad at somebody, be mad at the idiot DEM leaders in those states who moved up their primaries KNOWING it would render them meaningless and disenfrachising their own voters. And the HRC followers claiming the popular vote in a state Obama’s name WASN’T EVEN ON THE BALLOT is mind-boggling.
Congrats on your PA win, but you’re still going to lose and you all know it. You just can’t bring yourself to admit it. The truth hurts. Next up, getting your butz handed to you in North Carolina and possibly losing Indiana or at best winning by the smallest of margins. Either way, she is STILL going to be behind in popular vote and delegate count EVEN IF THEY GIVE HER FL AND MI. They won’t though. So keep practicing your victims excuses because MI and FL will not be seated and Superdelegates will not recognize your popular vote numbers from a state Obama wasn’t on the ballot in.
Posted by: Frankie | April 23, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
To Binger:
You claim the Clinton’s are trying to “steal” this thing from Obama. How do you figure? Please point to the section in the DNC party rules that states a candidate MUST be given the nomination if he/she wins a pluarality of the vote, but falls well short of 2,025.
As far as I know, a candidate only has a lock on the nomination if they gather 2,025 delegates – that number alone guarantees the nod. Otherwise the rules state it is up to the Superdelegates.
Why is it left up to the Superdelegates? Because any candidate that fails the magic number has FAILED, tout court. Hillary will have failed, but Obama will FAILED, also, if neither gets 2,025.
It is up to the Superdelegates to decide what to make of such a failure, and who – given such an lack of commanding lead by any candidate – best stands to win the National election.
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
SCOTT-WAIT TILL THE GE WHEN THE REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR HILLARY CONVERT BACK TO REPUBLICAN.
Posted by: READY999 | April 23, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
But Hillary is UnTrustworthy, so what Idiots voted for her in Pa.
Posted by: Ed | April 23, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Dan: Maybe you have a hateful, racist and anti-American “mentor and spiritual adviser” like Obama does, but I sure don’t. The fact that he does, speaks volumes about his character and judgment (or lack thereof).
Posted by: Fred | April 23, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Abstract measure? That is insulting!!!
It is absolute wrong that the DNC stripped MI and FL of their delegates. Obama threwed voters in both states under the bus because voters in MI an FL were not in favor of him.
For those Obama followers: do not count Obama will stand up for you. He can not be trusted. Unlock your mind before he threw you under the bus.
I want to know how our democratics stand up and make our voice heard to DNC to count MI and FL votes instad of complaining here.
Posted by: A Concerned Democratic | April 23, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Obama is basically a “flawed” candidate. Somehow, he has managed to turn this election into a racial divide! Before his guru, David Axelrod, started his “spin” on Hillary’s speech about MLK, race was NOT a factor… their camp started it all.
AND, with the help of the OBAMA NEWS NETWORKS, CNN and MSNBC, it escalated to the point of the discovery of Rev. Wright et al. This has obviously backfired on Obama.
The proof lies in how PA voted in yesterday’s primary. And NC will validate this as well. Blacks will overwhelmingly vote for Obama, and… you all know the ending.
And no matter how you spin it… HILLARY WON!!!
She won ALL the big States… and she won in FLA. Obama of course wants to dispute this, BUT HIS NAME WAS ON THE BALLOT too, so there!
Posted by: GS | April 23, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
wrong! caucus results aren’t counted properly into the popular vote tallies, and stop talking about the theoretical adding in of MI and FL votes! come on people, all candidates agreed these contests did not, would not count. Obama wasn’t even on the ballot in MI, and never campaigned in FL. even tiny little children know that counting these would be fraud. suggesting something similar would probably get them in trouble with their teachers at school. why on earth would anyone with a functioning brain think that its valid to give Clinton several hundred thousand votes in MI (where she generally polls slightly behind Obama) while giving Obama zero, none. not one vote. you have to be genuinely dumb to think its at all right or proper to calculate something so important using such specious methods.
Posted by: onceler | April 23, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Obama’s supporters in FL and MI did get the opportunity to vote for Obama. Obama advertised in both states and instructed his supporters to write-in his name on the ballot. Obama should at least get one vote for each supporter that wrote in his name on the ballot in FL and MI.
Posted by: cookie | April 23, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
I’m starting to see why Clinton has such support among uneducated, rural, blue collar voters. You’re not smart enough to understand how absurd her claims are. And many of her female supporters are so desperate to see a woman President, they WANT to believe her garbage so bad they’re willing to throw logic out the window. Jeez, half these women are so desperate for a woman President they’d vote for Heidi Fleiss.
Posted by: Frankie | April 23, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Still, She IS receiving support from key black leaders and obviously some black voters. In the face of what has to be tremendous pressure from peers, it makes their support all the more impressive!
This is why I believe Hillary gave Mayor Nutter such a big hug when she stepped on stage last night.
Posted by: Scott | April 23, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Hillary wins whites and Hispanics by an almost 2 to 1 margin. Barack wins blacks by an almost 9 to 1 margin. the first few contests had whites split their votes for Edwards and Hillary, while Barack got all the black votes. Now that Edwards is not in, hillary is getting those votes. Blacks make up about 12% of the population. Hispanics make up about 15%, and whites about 70%.
Do the math. Barack loses the general election. He can’t win.
As long as its a 2 man race, Barack loses. He can only win caucuses because they don’t represent the people. They simply do not allow enough people to vote. there are no caucuses in the general election.
Posted by: Phil | April 23, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Obama doesn’t consider MI and FL voters are of any worth in the primaries, but expects them to cast a vote for him in the election (should he get that far).
He’s counting on his black, affluent, and student voters to carry him. His 15 minutes of fame ended in PA.
bye bye bama not sorry to see you go.
Posted by: sheanne | April 23, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
You people speak as if Obama caused the problems with the Florida and Michigan voting debacle, when those two states simply broke the rules and were punished for it. How hard is that to admit, and how is it Obama’s fault that Hillary also broke the rules and because she did so, now the perception is that Obama HATES Florida and Michigan. So, in lieu of words used out of context and taken that way — lies about “being the first to speak out against the Iraqi war,” and “holding one’s head down as sniper fire whirled around” are preferable. I fear we have lost our minds in this country. For some reason down is up and up is down since Karl Rove became the spinmeister of the GOP. Hillary has learned well what the GOP does to win. Anything goes. So, let’s get this straight — according to the Clinton campaign, the candidate who is ahead in the popular vote, in delegates, and in number of states is not in fact ahead. The person who won big stages, but who has fewer delegates and is behind in the popular vote (unless, of course, you count Florida and Michigan) — is in fact the winner. Hillary likes to ask “Why can’t he close the deal?” Well, as someone put it so succinctly yesterday, whatever happened to the claim that she is the “inevitable nominee?”
Posted by: SierraBW | April 23, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Cookie, Obama’s name was on the ballot in FL. Along with Clinton’s. She crushed him… The FL vote should count!
Posted by: Floridaguy | April 23, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
better get ready in NC we counted over 4000 pro clintons who have never voted before this year and thats only in ONE SMALL TOWN.
Posted by: bobby | April 23, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Truthfully this race is already over. I don’t care how much the media likes high ratings, It’s over….no way to catch up, no michigan or florida votes to count sorry… let’s play fair, fire those leaders in your state congress and don’t blame obama because your candidate can’t win.
Posted by: sad democrat | April 23, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
According to exit polls in PA, it was the older, blue collar, less educated, and female voters that gave Senator Clinton the edge in that state. Many of whom, I suspect, were the same flip-floping voters who voted for Bush over Kerry in 2004, that’s who, Ed.
Posted by: Opa | April 23, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I agree, if one more dumb thing comes out of his mouth (and it will) or another anti-American looney close friend or family member surfaces (and it will), Obama will not win the election… he is already on the line as it is.
I am an independent and I will never, ever vote for Obama. Not be cause of his color, but because he really proved to me at the last debate that he cannot handle tough questions.
Posted by: George | April 23, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Truthfully this race is already over. I don’t care how much the media likes high ratings, It’s over….no way to catch up, no michigan or florida votes to count sorry… let’s play fair, fire those leaders in your state congress and don’t blame obama because your candidate can’t win.
Posted by: sad democrat | April 23, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Obama wins dreams, the Clinton’s win Elections!!! Hillary08!
Posted by: adam | April 23, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
A good number of those Republicans crossing over to vote in the Democratic primaries actually voted for Obama. (Not all Republicans go along with Rush Limbaugh’s advice). (In fact, most probably just a small few actually do).
Posted by: Scott | April 23, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
To one person who said he can’t handle tough questions. It’s sad to see people like to be lied to from their candidate. He didn’t have any tough questions to answer, they were all garbage. Why is it black people can’t love america too?
Posted by: sad democrat | April 23, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
FloridaguyL Yes, the FL votes should count. I just recalled Obama telling his supporters to write-in his name on the ballot in MI. Hillary should get all her votes and Obama should only get the write-in votes.
Posted by: cookie | April 23, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
DO NOT LET GET DISTRACTED ABOUT THE PRIMARIES IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.RIGHT NOW, WE DON’T CARE WHO IS GOING TO BE THE FIRST BLACK OR THE FIRST WOMAN TO BECOME PRESIDENT OF U.S.LET’S FORGET ABOUT THE HISTORY THE TWO CANDIDATES WOULD MAKE WHEN ELECTED BECAUSE THAT IS NOT WHAT ALL THIS IS ABOUT.WE WILL TALK ABOUT HISTORY WHEN EVERYTHING WILL BE OVER.WE NEED TO BRING OUT IN OUR COMMENTS,THE RIGHT JUDGEMENT ,IN A RESPONSIBLE AND INTELLECTUAL WAY THAT WILL HELP DETERMINE THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR THE PARTY.FOR THAT REASON, WE NEED TO STOP BRINGING OUR FEELINGS AND SENTIMENTS INTO THE PROCESS,FOR THEY CAN LEAD US TO A WRONG CHOICE
LET’S BE VERY VERY VERY CAREFUL
Posted by: thierry | April 23, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Hillary Math:
(vote x 2 + 4)-7(discounted state x 3) – caucuses x .75% = ahead in popular vote
If above doesn’t yield win, use following formula:
other votes – hillary vote – caucuses + 200*2 = ahead in popular vote
If above doesn’t yield win, use following formula:
Other vote = 0
Hillary vote = 1
Rules = 0
O < R < H = ahead in popular vote
Posted by: chris | April 23, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
The fact is this Clinton did not care about Florida or Michigan which is why she also agreed that their primary would not count. When she realized that Obama was kicking her butt in this race and she needed the votes and delegates from Florida and Michigan, that is when she started crying like a little girl. Clinton has no chance of winning, Obama has such a huge lead it will be impossible. The sad thing is if she would have been mature and ran a CLEAN instead of DIRTY race maybe they couldve shared the same ticket. Obama is the true fighter. He walked into this race virtually unknown to most in the United States and he is beating Clinton, actually, the Clintons (both Hillary and Bill. With all of the EXPERIENCE that she claims, she is being beaten on all fronts by Obama. Even her campaign staff is out of order. My view is this if she can not control and manage her campaign staff, she shouldnt be in the White House
Posted by: Tired | April 23, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Don’t Obama supporters see something distasteful in their candidate’s efforts to repeat Bush’s dis-enfranchisement of Florida’s voters? Isn’t that immoral? More people have voted for Clinton than Obama. Clinton won: California, Texas, Ohio, Florida, New York, Penn., N.J., Mass. But, hey, 10,000 people in an Idaho or North Dakota caucus can’t be wrong? Can they?
Posted by: JimF | April 23, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
GO HILLARY!!! GO HILLARY!!!
and don’t forget to count the votes in China and Columbia, She’s the best!!!I’m voting for her in November.
OMG, I’m going to cry!!!
Posted by: Hal | April 23, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
For a man who is suppose to be a former
constitutional professor knows that the
constitution trumps the dnc rules. Those votes have to count, also in our constitution it does not state that Iowa,and New Hampshire get to start the
voting.
This is just one of the reasons I can not vote for him.
Posted by: Melissa | April 23, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Obama fans are crying about an ad that the Republicans may use that depicts Obama’s racist and anti-American “mentor and spiritual adviser,” Rev. Wright. If Obama didn’t want to be associated with such a crude and hateful man, he shouldn’t have attended his church for 20 years, considered him his mentor and spiritual adviser, and appointed him to one of his election committees. I remember when Obama was asked about Wright before anyone knew about him, he said that there is “nothing controversial at all” about him or his church. Well, if Wright is such a nice and non-controversial figure, why is everyone upset that he is starring in a commercial. Obama fans can’t have it both ways. They’ve been defending Wright constantly in order to defend their messiah. As such, they should be happy to see this “wonderful man” who has “done so much for the community” on television. It should only help Obama, right?:
Posted by: Fred | April 23, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
I’m so confused. I thought the president was voted in by the US Supreme Court?
Posted by: Greg Patchick | April 23, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
I’m beginning to see why Karl Rove thinks we’re so gullible. All the people who bought his hype in 2000 and 2004 are on thIS board tonight. Even given where the GOP has brought us. Even given that John McCain wants to make permanent the tax cuts that were supposed to fuel the economy, but didn’t. Even though John McCain can only point to his having been a war hero as a strength. Even though the Bush Administration has shredded the Constitution, using signing statements to avoid following the rule of law, flagrant breaking of laws, paying members of the press to write complimentary articles about no child left behind. Even though Hillary voted along with other misguided people to send our young men and women to Iraq based on faulty intelligence. Even as Americans lose their homes, thanks to the wheeling and dealing of predatory lenders, who were given carte blanche by the Bush Administration to trick some unsuspecting Americans. We are in quicksand, and obviously loving it! We would rather chose the devils we know (Hillary, McCain and the NeoCons in the background), than someone who will help us to regain our integrity in the world, as would Obama. Many foreign leaders are hoping for an Obama win, because then we can once more forge the special alliances with other countries that George W. Bush and his cronies have so arrogantly destroyed. We need to think for ourselves, stop listening to the spin, and face reality. We are headed down the drain fast, and should catch ourselves before we reach a point of no return. Remember, though NAFTA was a Republican initiative, Bill Clinton signed it into law, and Hillary was there honing the experience that she touts so loudly today. It is time for CHANGE! Bush/Clinton – Bush/Clinton — ENOUGH!
Posted by: SierraBW | April 23, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
First of all, insulting Clinton supporters is exactly why Obama will not get 255 of their vote in November. Obama supporters are the ones who believe that their candidate is the annointed candidate. Annointed? Yes, I’m a Clinton supporter and I have an education. Purushsharma73, you are the reason why people still vote for Clinton, because clearly we dont just listen to what our candidate has to say, we KNOW her plans for the country and our futures. How can Obama claim that the voices of the people matter to him when his campaugn has constantly refused to acknowledge those loyal Democrats who voted in Michigan and Florida. Obama supporters keep rooting for them to not be counted and we’ll see what happens to your candidate in November. In recent polls Clinton is ahead of McCain in Florida and Michigan in the General, while Obama is behind in Florida, which is crucial! So keep disenfranchising voters Obama Campaign, it seems to be working for you in the Primaries, but the General Election is another story! If Obama wins this nomination because of Michigan and Florida not being counted, Clinton needs to run as an Independent, and she’ll surely have more electoral votes in the General Election!
Hillary ’08
Posted by: Jonath | April 23, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
To Ed,
Ed, Thank you for replying to my post, I think it is fascinating that this blog and others exists to allow people to communicate with each other. It wasn’t around in the last 5 of 6 elections for President I voted in.
I do wish the paid staffers for each campaign would get off of here and let people talk without propaganda.
I served as the Vice Chairman of my local Republican Party in the 90s, and have since moved to independent.
Lets say Hillary does figure out a way to rest the nomination, I see that as improbable, but Barack could say or do something that would merit it, so not impossible.
In the 90s there were many opinions formed about the Clintons that will resurface should that be the case.
1. The fact that most American women viewed Hillary’s acceptance of Bill’s number of affairs as a political decision will haunt her especially among the general populace.
2. The numerous investigations, Whitewater etc.., with and without merit, will make for some TV attack ad fodder.
3. The idea that my two grown sons have never had the opportunity to have ever voted for any other name than Bush, or Clinton in 20+ years, just doesn’t feel American to me. That feels somewhat elitist.
The hard facts of politics is the mere act of running for office seems to change people. I am going to vote, not so much for a person, but against the terrible corporate influence that has destroyed my country in the last couple of decades. If you can convince me that is Hillery then giddyup, I promise you I will cast that way. I vote on the 6th.
(Note I didn’t say convince me that it is NOT Barack or John Mac)
Posted by: Dan | April 23, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Here’s a salient and topical question for you:
Are we witnessing a realignment of the Democratic Party?
I’m convinced that there are many African-Americans, like me, who will not vote for Hillary Clinton under ANY circumstance.
She lost my vote when she entered into race politics during the last debate (bringing Farrakhan into the debate, among other cryptic messages designed
to raise whites’ fear of Obama).
This coming from the spouse of the man
once affectionately characterized as the ‘first black president.’ Blacks have been the Clinton’s most ardent and loyal supporters — and we get race-coded politics? That’s the Republicans, right?
My point is this. John McCain is not George Bush or Ronald Reagan, or the ilk of politically hostile Republicans that have turned off blacks in the past. I’ve never voted for a Republican presidential candidate but should Hillary find a way to wrest away the nomination, I’ll be voting for McCain.
Republicans have been wooing the black vote for years, with no success. There’s an opening — unlike any in decades. John McCain, are you taking note!
Posted by: Charles Penn | April 23, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
James Carville just summed up Obama’s campaign very nicely, “he’s running away from the presidency, not towards the presidency.” If Obama wants to win the GE, he needs to allow the MI and FL votes to count, or allow a revote, he needs to agree to debate Hillary again, and he needs to stop “hiding under the skirts of the NYT editorial board everytime something goes the way he doesn’t like” so says James Carville very succinctly. If Obama STEALS this nomination, the way he cheated and used dirty tricks to get his state senate seat and his US Senate seat, then Democrats will look at this primary process as Election 2000 all over again. What is going on DNC? Obama and the DNC are resorting to the POLITICS OF THE NEOCONS! The “Golden Boy” is not so golden, and the people are sending messages loud and clear, they want their votes to count and their voices to be heard!! If Obama wasn’t such a wimp, he’d allow a revote, debate Hillary 9 more times, and stop his whining. GO HILLARY 08!
Posted by: calli | April 23, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Hey Kaiser both Obama and Al Gore are bunch of loosers!
The only Democrat in 33 years who won the White House is CLINTON!
LOL
Posted by: Dan | April 23, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
I agree, if one more dumb thing comes out of his mouth (and it will) or another anti-American looney close friend or family member surfaces (and it will), Obama will not win the election… he is already on the line as it is.
I am an independent and I will never, ever vote for Obama. Not be cause of his color, but because he really proved to me at the last debate that he cannot handle tough questions.
Posted by: George | April 23, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Melissa maybe you should read the Constitution. It says NOTHING about political parties or their primaries.
So “constitution trumps the dnc rules. Those votes have to count…” — what does this mean?
Posted by: Don | April 23, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
SIMPLE, OBAMA WIN’S, 4 MORE YEARS OF BUSH. F A C T !
Posted by: drwfll | April 23, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Who really cares they will both lose to McCain.
So much money wasted on two losers
Posted by: a citizen | April 23, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
FL has 27 electoral votes and MI has 17. Florida is the 4th largest state and MI is the 7th largest state in the electoral college.
Obama, you disenfranchise those voters, you can kiss even being competitive if you are the nominee. Dukakis of 1988 won’t even be close to what they will do to your biracial behind.
Posted by: Knowledgeforreal | April 23, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
GO HILLARY!!! keep sailing the Titanic, don’t let anybody say that you can’t win, GO!!! GO!!! GO!!!
Posted by: Hal | April 23, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
We voters, in Florida, voted when we were told to do so…it was not our choice on the day to vote and we should be disenfranchised; if so count on us to disenfranchise Obama, if he is the candidate in November….Our electoral votes matter each election. Obama lied, he had political ads on tv all the time, over and over and over…we had a record turnout and Hillary won; he was on the ballot, people and she won. This is a democratic process, to not count our votes, because Obama does not want them counted; that is the reason and we know it.
Posted by: Margie | April 23, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
OBAMA IS A CROOKED SCUMBAG, JUST LIKE HIS FRIENDS, FOR TREATING THE VOTERS OF FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN LIKE SECOND-CLASS CITIZENS.
HE WILL SAY OR DO ANYTHING TO TRY TO WIN. HIS CROOKED FRIENDS ARE COUNTING ON HIM.
Posted by: DAVE S. | April 23, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Melissa, that is a flimsy excuse not to vote for Obama. Why don’t you admit the real reason you WON’T vote for him. Obama didn’t invent what happened in Florida or Michigan, but election officials of those states did. I don’t hear anybody complaining about why they broke the rules in the first place, which has brought us to this sorry pass. The officials who decided to hold elections ahead of the stated schedules deserve the bulk of the guff and ridicule for breaking the rules. Instead, because you want two liars back in the White House, you want to blame Obama because the rules were broken in those states. But then, I guess there are more liars in the world than truth tellers, and I suppose all liars stick together.
Posted by: SierraBW | April 23, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Charles Penn: Hillary didn’t bring up Farrakhan in the debate, the moderators did. Hillary did say that she would not accept the endorsement of someone who is racist and anti-semitic. Can you blame her for saying that? Obama himself agreed after much prodding, and denounced Farrakhan, himself. So, what did she do wrong with regard to Farrakhan?
Posted by: Fred | April 23, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
CHARLES PENN—-YOU HIT HE NAIL ON THE HEAD! ON MINE EARLIER POST I STATED THE SAME! IF DEMOCRATS CANT BE WITH US WHY US WITH THEM.
Posted by: READY999 | April 23, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
I will vote for Obama and I am an African American. I will vote for McCain if the Dean 25 super delegates do not give Hillary a fair hand. I heard that Dean and most of the super delegates do not like Hillary and Bill for personal reasons. And, their supports have already been locked in for Obama. This is not about their personal issues. It is about picking the best candidate. I do not care that much for McCain but I will vote for McCain to protest against the DNC and Dean 25 super delegates for allowing this mess to happen. It was their responsible to ensure that both candidates are treated fair by the media outlets and it was their responsible to ensure that we get the best candidate possible, not look at how much money a candidate can bring to their mouths. In the end, I hope all the DNC delegates and Dean 25 super delegates are kicked out of office.
Posted by: cookie | April 23, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
You people speak as if Obama caused the problems with the Florida and Michigan voting debacle, when those two states simply broke the rules and were punished for it.
======================================
Blah..blah…blah…lot of spin there. no matter how much Obamaniacs can spin rest of the population isn’t buying it..Here are the facts:
1) Rules were broken by MI& FL party officials and it is a messup
2) the voters of MI and FL are not responsible for #1 above
3)Obam camp was/is opposed to a revote ( which would clear up the mess) not because they are all for the rules but for the fact that most likely he’ll lose both states.
4) Knowing all of the above ………Obamaniacs desperately claim we should follow the “rules” and not count the votes of FL and MI.
5) New kinda politics?!!! Hope and Change! Uniter?!!!
Posted by: dem | April 23, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Hillary is the only candidate worth looking at unless the 300 remaining supers decide to nominate Al Gore. Obama lost his chance for the presidency, even in 2012. He associates himself with people that have questionable reputations. He has lied just as much, if not more, than Clinton. Obama is a respectable senator, but he is not fit to be President by any means.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: Jonath | April 23, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Obama is such a wimp. No guts, no brains and cant put two words together if he isnt reading from a script. He is a total elitist and a black supremacist. He was sent to the best schools and given preferential treatment his entire life. He also has proven to be the dirtiest of all politicians using bully and silencing techniques to supress voters. Who would cast a vote for this Black Militant who along with his wife, can barely stand America.
Posted by: Jon | April 23, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
WHO WOULD EXPECT BIGOTED FLORIDA TO VOTE FOR A BLACK MAN ANYWAY! Oh yeah, you have such lovely men as Mark Foley to be proud of. And Gov. Jeb Bush who spoke (unbeknownst to him on microphone) that he had “a devious plan to deceive the voters!” Even after that you voted for him again. So, why would anybody expect good judgment to come out of such a racist state! Were I Obama, I’d be insulted to have your vote! There are many worse things than Rev. Wright having called a spade a spade. Florida deserves Hillary!
Posted by: SierraBW | April 23, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Thanks for the Hope of a better tomorrow, Senator Barack. I absolutely love you… Win or Lose, You are a real hero… Dr.King was suppose to be a communist because he loved America, it wasn’t until he died, some people realized he was only trying to help. Thanks for caring about Me,God Bless Ya!
Posted by: America Loves Me Not! | April 23, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
dem: No Obama or Hillary did not create this probem with FL and MI. This problem was created by Dean and the DNC party.
Posted by: cookie | April 23, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Hey david,
That means if I get a call from the Obama camp, I may be talking to a Hamas sucicide bomber a terrorist?
BWAAAAAAAA
Posted by: Suzi | April 23, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
To onceler
Rules are rules, as Obama’s partisans like to point out.
So…lets obey the rules. But please don’t make up new rules that don’t in fact exist.
I am a voter from MI. I am not arguing that the delegates should be
counted. My state party leaders messed up, but it now seems to late to fix in a way that would be fair to both candidates.
However, since we Michigan Democrats are all being asked to take on on the chin for party rules, please point out the section in the party rules that says just because a candidate wins a PLURALITY of delegates, they MUST be given the nomination. I don’t think it exists.
At best Obama’s claim to the nomination isn’t based on party rules, at all. It is a “moral claim” to the victory, because he’s won more votes of the votes that are being counted.
Obama’s partisans argue that plurality automatically equals victory. However, the DNC rules do not state this.
Since Obama’s plurality doesn’t even include voter’s preferences from MI & FL, two key states, I think this makes the moral argument pretty weak.
If all you are making is a moral argument (not in fact an argument based on DNC rules) then the fact that MI and FL’s votes are not being willfully shut out here is very, very relevant.
Since neither Obama nor Hillary will lock in the nomination (according to the rules), let the superdelegates consider what this means. This is in fact what the DNC rules say should happen. So, please don’t claim you are somehow mysteriously being cheated if this is what it comes to. May the best candidate win:-)
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Obama’s tired of the same old Wash politics?? He wants to change Wash??
LOL LOL——————————–
Obama, along with Edwards, Biden, and Richardson, removed their names with about two hrs to go on the last day of the filing period in MI because they wanted to suck up to Iowa & NH voters and try to p— NH and IA voters off against Clinton if she stayed on the ballot. The DNC did not ask them to take their names off the ballot.——————–Obama tried to have his name removed from FL ballots too, but FL law would not allow him to. Why would he want his name off the FL ballot?? With his name off the ballot his claims that the vote was unfair would seem more valid. With his name ON the ballot, it is just a humiliating defeat and the reason he is fighting so hard to keep the vote from counting as cast. Obama doesn’t think it’s fair if people vote against him. These are examples of the same dirty Chicago political tactics he used to win his first elections.
Posted by: factfinder19 | April 23, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
<>
Why blame this on Obama? It’s the DNC that makes the decision as to whether those states count. In fact, it was THOSE STATES that put themselves in a position to be punished by the DNC. So, if anyone, blame the idiots who govern the states.
And this would not be an issue if Clinton and her cronies did not make it an issue, hence making it an agrument to be used in the general.
Frankly, the Democrats chances of winning in November now are near zero, now. They’ve beaten themselves up so much that whoever gets the nomination will be mincemeat for the Republican attack machine.
Get your anti-Pres. McCain protest signs ready Democrats. You’ve blown it once again. *thumbs up*
What a bunch of morons.
Posted by: Gary K. | April 23, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
I meant to write: “If all you are making is a moral argument (not in fact an argument based on DNC rules) then the fact that MI and FL’s votes are … BEING willfully shut out here is very, very relevant.
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
David,
Thank you for the hamas Obama clip!
I will send it to the media tonight!
I can not belive Obama can accept camoaign volunteers from Hamas!
Posted by: Lynn | April 23, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Well, I guess Michelle Obama had every reason to just begin to be proud of her country. She’s probably by now realized how mistaken she is — she spoke too soon. And Obama tried to be above the fray, giving whites the benefit of the doubt–hoping that embuing a people with attributes they don’t in fact have, would cause them to adopt those attributes. How wrong he was!
Posted by: SierraBW | April 23, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Can one person tell me what congress does? I thought they write the laws and all we need is a president on our side to sign them? Let Hillary write the laws and let Obama Sign them. and Maybe he can change the Heart of some those evil terrorist overseas and here in america,they may like him and make some type of peace deal when we leave Iraq, they’ll definitely hate hillary or john. He has changed my life forever hopefully you’ll believe in yourself to know you have the power to change America. God bless you hillary lovers, but cmon you gotta be fair…michigan and florida can only be split 50/50 sorry it’s not obama’s fault.
Posted by: Annie | April 23, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Obama is ahead in states!!! All the ones that Republicans carry in every election… Clinton has won all the “BIG” states that swing back and forth… IF dems have any real chance in this NOV election to defeat McCain, they will nominate Clinton… Remember another Clinton won it twice!
Posted by: tish | April 23, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Does Obama not realize how loathsome he has become to those of us who believe that the Democratic Party must not disenfranchise the voters of Michigan and Florida? I will not vote for him, if he is the nominee, even if Clinton is his VP choice. His actions to deny the voters of Fla, and Mich. the right to vote is inexcusable.
Posted by: david | April 23, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
this has always been hillary’s contest to lose. in every state she has gone in ahead and lost ground. not a winner. all she has to thank are aging women’s libbers and bubbas. not a winner.
Posted by: Kevin Dellit | April 23, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Hillary keep using those hate and fear commercials, they scared all the morons into voting for you, I hope she wins and becomes president, I wish she was my mother!!! what a fine example she is to all the young voters…
Posted by: Hal | April 23, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Obama sponsored a bill to make “mail-in” voting easier. Then he complained and blocked a “mail-in” revote in FL, saying there was no way to check the accuracy of the votes. Then Obama and his big team of lawyers blocked a revote in MI. Obama prefers the caucus states because the thugs from moveonorg. can go in and use intimidation and other scare tactics to swing the caucus vote for Obama. By the way, Virginia has an open primary, and there was a HUGE Republican crossover vote for Obama in the state. So all you Obamanations saying that Obama will win VA in the GE, don’t count on it, Virginians cling to their guns and their religion..Obama is losing his “aura of new politics” every day, and democrats are really beginning to see how the “new Washington” would work with Obama in the White House..it would be tea time with Rev. Wright, Farrakhan, talk kickbacks with Tony Rezko, talk business in Syria with Tony Rezko, talk Hamas and pro-palestinian policies, talk about “typical white people”, small town people who are bitter and clinging to their guns and religion…oh, it will be endless…
Posted by: rs | April 23, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
I beleive that the punishment was not to count the delegates. They didn’t say anything about counting the votes.
Posted by: The Lord of War | April 23, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
hillary supporters-grown-up. rules are rules.you break them,you pay the price.NO TO CROOKED FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN FOR MS.DISHONEST HRC!!!!!!!
Posted by: READY999 | April 23, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
If I were Clinton, I would run independant bipartisan and divide this unfair party!
This way they will get their lesson!
By the way, she should also run for NY governor as an independant, She will win!
Posted by: Kathy, CA | April 23, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Frankie……..
I guess you would welcome the term elitist for yourself whilst condemning its reference to Obama.
The problem with your argument is that you base your argument on assumptions rather than facts.
Lets consider the facts.
As far as gender goes it never fails to amaze me how people such as yourself play the “women are so desperate” angle.
DI suppose you don’t care that up until PA Clinton held 50% of women voters compared to Obama’s 46%. Gee lets go deregister that group of 4% desperate women that tilts the female vote against poor Barack.
How did you miss that men are obviously more desperate to retain a male in the white house as they go for Obama 53% to 41%.
Where is your horror that Clinton retains an 8% advantage with white voters whilst Obama retains a massive 68% advantage with black voters.
Obama receives 83% of all black voters yet you don’t call that desperate don’t even notice it.
uneducated: no high school certificate only accounts for 5 % of voters.
rural: only 9% of the voters
blue collar: lets say under 75k 50% of the vote.
Stop trying to portray Obama as some victim and degrading the vote people vote for who they want, why they want and it doesn’t matter a toss what their reasons are because it is a democracy.
Posted by: seriously | April 23, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Ready999,
It was the Republicans in FL and MI that moved the primaries up not Hillary Clinton you idiot. LMAO
Posted by: PZ | April 23, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
You watch Hillary to win IN, KT,westVA, Guam, Puerto Rico with large margins!
Obama will carry NC and OR!
The end the superdelegates will have to switch for Hillary because she will run as a bipartisan independant!
LOL
Posted by: Keth | April 23, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
She won 60 of the 67 counties. It is a big win, OBAMA unleashed an unprecendented ATTACK that Pennsylvanians watched at 4 commercials per hour. What a waste of money…and she won. She won every county bordering Philly which is a big african-american population. SHE WON.
Posted by: mj | April 23, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
He does not respect Florida and Michigan with saying that words.
His backer, Bill Richardson keeps saying he is the uniter.
Proven , he can not get white working class and Catholic votes.
Posted by: crisis08 | April 23, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
The Lord of War, You are exactly right. Howard Dean’s letter to Democratic Presidential Candidates on Aug. 31, 2007 stated: “The 2008 Delegate Selection Rules adopted by the full DNC at its August 2006 meeting clearly provide that only 4 states – IA, NV, NH and SC – may hold their respective contests prior to 2/5/08. The findings of Non-Compliance included a 100% loss of pledged and unpledged delegates.” I see no reason why Hillary should not be able to claim the popular votes in both these states.
Posted by: factfinder19 | April 23, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
She won in PA and will win the nomination. How does Madam President sound to all of our BHO supporters.
Posted by: PZ | April 23, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
To READY999:
RE: “hillary supporters-grown-up. rules are rules.you break them,you pay the price.NO TO CROOKED FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN FOR MS.DISHONEST HRC!!!!!!!”
I think many Hillary supporters would happily vote for Obama in the national election. Although Obama partisans keep insisting that “rules are rules”, you can not show where the DNC rules dictate Obama wins after failing to win the necessary 2,025 delegates. So, you really aren’t that concerned about the rules after all, are you. You only want Obama to win, at whatever the cost to the party.
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
a win is a win …..BO will not be the nominee and will not be president ..didnt you people see in the exit polls that 24 percent of hillary supporters will not vote for BO thats a problem for you… please go away the true democratic party does not want you… need screwed up and made you part of the process !
Posted by: Stan G | April 23, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Obama the uniter cannot win PA even after 7 weeks of campaigning and spending 12 million dollars in mostly negative advertising…doing the Jay Z “brush off” dance and giving Hillary the finger were the highlight of the PA primary…WAIT – THAT WAS THE MI and FL VOTERS OBAMA WAS FLIPPING THE BIRD AT!!
Posted by: rs | April 23, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
It’s a Republican – Clinton ploy. They paid Hillary to run.
Here’s the deal – they pay Hillary and her campaign expenses – she runs – McCain gets in – she keeps the money they paid her. Obama put a crimp in that plan – they can’t beat Obama in November – that’s why she has to fight till the end – she doesn’t want to give the money back….. That explains their $50 million in speaking fees….
Get real people.
Posted by: cari | April 23, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
It is appalling that Mr. Obama thinks that his political ambitions are more legitimate than the will of the millions of voters who have spoken in Michigan and Florida. Remember what happened the last time we disenfranchised Florida voters and the delegate count trumped the popular vote – that’s right –GEORGE BUSH.
Posted by: smiles | April 23, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
How come Obama and his cronies blocked Florida and Michigan from have their revotes. What’s wrong with a revote? The fact is the polls show that in any revote in Michigan and Florida Hillary would have trounced Obama even worse. Florida and Michigan should boycott the general election if Obama is the nominee. Also, how come Obama is chicken to debate Clinton again one-on-one. Is he afraid people will see the real, flawed Obama like they did in the previous debate. Do we democrats want a chicken, coward, seriously flawed, wimpy Obama to be our nominee?
Posted by: Doreen | April 23, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
if obama could just get only his people to be allowed to vote in the general, he could win.
he’ll try. intimidation, guilt trips, lies, buying votes, whatever.
he won’t succeed. americans aren’t stupid, even though he thinks we are.
Posted by: so saddened | April 23, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Well, well……who ever wins the latest state has the ‘momentum’. Pundits across the land get paid for their take on ‘what’s next’. This time for only the 15th time it is HRC, just like when Obama took Iowa. However he has had 30 state wins…..his turn for the pundits eye next. Why are we as a nation so fickle we will change with every TV analysis? With every negative comment…why are we so gullible to believe each and every edited sound byte? Obama is ahead in the popular vote and for HRC to twist and turn it into, ‘Well so what…he has the popular vote, that doesn’t matter! Super Delegates should vote for me anyway!’ Thanks Hill, thanks for telling me again that my vote does not matter.
Kinda sounds like Nov. 2000, doesn’t it. And look what we got that time!
Posted by: George | April 23, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
You spoke the truth! well said…..
Posted by: TrueDoreen | April 23, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
People just lose track of the facts when they are guided only by a negative emotional approach, I’d say unethical (as it is against the common good) and obsessive.
Most people supporting any candidate seem to forget values, truth and facts, when arguing in an election. It is absolutely clear that they think they’re the only morally right when, ironically, they are shamelessly making use of low attacks to manifest their opinion and are willing to forget value or ethics in order to win.
Points of view do not exist anymore, just justifications, as the side is taken in any issue before reasonable analysis of the facts, and based only on the side it benefits. This is not adequate social behaviour.
This is a sign in our society of strong weakness and deviation from what we are supposed to be and from what we expect for future generations.
Posted by: Awake | April 23, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
I am an uneducated Phd MD voted for Hillary Clinton too!
My husband owns a big business and holds an MBA , he first time voted Democrat too!
Bias media drives me crazy!
Posted by: Kathleen | April 23, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
The real facts are that Obama outspent Clinton 3 to 1 in Pennsylvania, and lost. She won 78% of the blue Collar vote, she won 80% of the Catholic vote, and 68% of the white male vote. America is built on the blue collar vote, its America’s bread and butter. You can bet the Super Delegates are taking notice to this. Added to this, Clinton has won all the BIG swing states by a margin of 10+ points, again, the Dems don’t want to lose these states to the GOP. And now, the Reverend Wright is appearing this weekend again, in an interview with Bill Moyers. It seems that Obama IS unelectable, and I honestly feel that the Super Delegates will see this. Also, Florida and Michigan votes will be counted and hopefully seated. If they are not counted, this will rip the DNC to pieces. Either way, Obama will not gain. These states will be Clinton’s, giving her the necessary delegate count to capture the nomination. I see Obama’s campaign imploding…..he can’t close the deal ….he has a lot of money, but basically is an empty suit. Clinton, with a lot less money is doing a better job and is more effective. She is a fighter that won’t give up….this is what America needs as a President. Hillary 08 !
Posted by: david from texas | April 23, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
So when HC gets blitzed in NC, is it over? Or are we supposed to count cuba and canada votes next, if HC can only get just her name on the ballot of course? Both candidates signed off on Michigan not counting and now lets change the game, Both candidates. It is over and the NYT said it best, HC needs to get out now!! As for McBush you must be kidding….
Posted by: ndrick50 | April 23, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
To George:
No George, the only vote that doesn’t matter in fact is the vote of ta MI or FL Democrat. So, please, quit whining.
Neither Obama or Hillary has managed to get the necessary delegates in the remaining primaires (2,025) so let the Superdelegates decide. That is what the DNC rules dictate.
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
This is absurd. Her count not counts Florida and Michigan, it does not count 4 caucus states, which, when counted, results in her being behind. She is not advocating counting all the votes, she is cherry picking which states count, including counting a state where he wasn’t on the ballot, and not counting 4 states. How is that counting every vote?
Posted by: Ridiculous | April 23, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
What I find absurd about Obama supporters is how they “cling” to the rules that suit them.
They choose to disenfranchise voters by shutting Florida & Michigan out because it would hurt Saint Obama. Those are the rules they say.
Well then cling to these rules Obama supporters: The Superdelegates can vote for whoever they want to!!!!!
Posted by: Carol 17 | April 23, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Obama is a hypocrite.
Obama wasn’t just being a good little democrat when Fl and MI were struck out. Obama was delighted the DNC wanted to oust FL and MI they would have been 2 big early losses for him regardles of what happened in Iowa etc. It would have been massive momentum for Clinton with big numbers in both delegates and popular vote.
I also think it is hypocritical taliking about an even playing field when he had every candidate removed off the ballot back in his first run for the legislator because he didn’t think he could beat Alice Palmer in an actual election. So he used legal ploys to circumvent the elction.
Funny how legal papers seale court documents in fact just happened to be leaked against firstly Obamas democratic oppostion for his senate nomination then the republican he initially opposed for the senate.
Lets see 3 lots of legal manouverings during elections in good old honest Illinois and gosh they all were to Obamas advantage what a coincidence, what good fortune. Shame he has no legal circle connections in Ilinois OOOPs he does corrupt connections too.
So forgive me if I don’t buy the choir boy act. He doesn’t want Fl and MI as they can hurt him even a revote.
Don’t dish it out if you can’t take it .
Posted by: I don't think so | April 23, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
NDRICK50- KNOWING THE HILLARY SUPPORTERS THEY ALSO WANT TO COUNT CHINA WHERE ALL THE AMERICAN JOBS WENT –THANKS TO BILL.
Posted by: READY999 | April 23, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
GOOD POINT!
OBAMA WILL DOUBLE YOUR CAPITAL GAINS TAXES!
HILLARY WILL INCERASE 5 MORE PERCENT THAN CURRANT (20%)
MCCAIN WILL REMAIN THE SAME (15%)
AND THAT IS ONE OF THE REASONS I AM NOT VOTING FOR OBAMA!
If Hillary does not make it, I will switch for McCain!
Posted by: Larry | April 23, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Wait, if you count Bills votes in 1992 and 1996 and all of bill’s votes fro Gov and HRC senate elections, clearly these are all meant to ascend Hilary to president. Actual the whole system since the constitution was designed to put HRC in office, so actually every vote ever given anyway is for HRC, she has 1 BILLION VOTES AND COUNTING.
Posted by: Lanny Sprayvis | April 23, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
To ndick50: To quote the NYTimes in relation to Hillary, is like quoting FOX news, except the NYT is much more unreliable and incredibly biases towards their golden boy cry baby obama…sorry, but the NYT ain’t what it used to be…Hillary is going all the way to Puerto Rico, and they are predicting at least a 1.5 million voter turnout, how much of that popular vote do you think Obama will be getting? Yeah, Obama should just continue on with his “screw MI and FL plan”, it seems to be working out well for him…
Posted by: rs | April 23, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Newsweek is a drivin Anti-American news source. Just looking for support to pay rich CEO salaries. Check this real link out… Hillary is ahead by 125,000 plus popular votes now…
Popular Vote (w/FL & MI)** 14,993,348 47.4% 15,116,076 47.8% Clinton +122,728 +0.4%
Posted by: john | April 23, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
This blog clearly is showing that if Obama gets the nomination, everybody supports Hillary will switch to John McCain!
May be it is better for us to have McCain and win the war in Iraq and capture some oil in order to cover our expenses too!
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
How can Hillary Pinnochio Clinton
argue that Michigan’s votes should be counted? There was No Election in
Michigan! Hillary Clinton was the only name on the ballot! That is not an election it is a coronation!
I’m sure that in Russia the Michigan
Primary with one candidate on the ballot
would be considered democracy but
this is the U.S.A.!
Obama is ahead in delegates, popular
votes(even counting Florida)and
states won!
Hillary Clinton go home before
you destroy your own Party!
Posted by: reaganfan | April 23, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Hillary AGREED not to count Florida and Michigan. Everyone did. Now that she has lost the election, she is trying to change the rules. You can’t tell people their vote isn’t going to count, have them vote, then count it later. Only a complete moron would consider that an accurate reflection of the will of the people.
The irony of it is that Michigan is an Obama state. JESSE JACKSON WON MICHIGAN. Hillary would have lost it. Now, she is claiming all the votes from that state. Then, she is not counting several caucus states. She is actually disenfranchising more people with her vote count (those that voted “uncommitted” in Michigan and those that voted in 4 other states) then his vote count. She is a hypocrite and this whole thing is a joke.
Posted by: Dan | April 23, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Can we honestly be fair in MI and FL. I think Hillary and her supporters are desperate…It’s kind of sad to watch grownups act like my 3 year old.
Posted by: Honesty | April 23, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Hey tish and the rest of you Hillies,
I hate to break it to you but the party will not reward Hillary the nomination even if she brings him down with her kitchen sink. She will not be leading in any valid metric so they will not destroy the party by alienating the most Loyal Constituiency of the Democratic party. In any election all the way down to dogcatcher democrats start with 85% of the African American Vote. If they can’t find that they pull the lever and nominate Obama they will not give it to Hillary. That leaves the convention turning to Al Gore. So in the fall it will be Al Gore or Obama. The Clintons are History.
Posted by: Kaiser | April 23, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
To Carol 17:
Thank you. That is the point I keep trying to make. I am glad someone else sees things this way, too.
Posted by: John | April 23, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Obama is finished because he could not win in OH, MI, FL and now PA!
Those states are the ones he needs to carry in order to win in November!
That simple!
If Hillary supporters would have 100% backed him than , I’d say sure, he will win but they don’t!
We can’t blame Hillary either because her base is blue colar voters, and Obama called them bitter!
Her supporters are Jewish, Obama has ties with hamas, Farakkhan, Rev Wright and he is an anti-semite
He than made a mistake and called middle class white Americans typical white person than insulted them that they have guns and they go to the curch!
So those fellows , at least some of them will definitely go for John McCain!
If we look at Hillary, she did not insult any of the Obama supporters at all! And she has no contreversial problems with the black nor youth!
Posted by: Johnathon | April 23, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
If Florida and Michigan doesn’t clean up their state house instead of insulting the guy they wanted to lose, they’ll never get a fair chance at electing a president. I personally believe the republicans tried to set the democrats up on purpose, so they can rely on your emotions to sway the vote for them. Those republicans were right to count on you guys ignorance, evidence by many of the commentors today. Grow Up and punish the real culprit.
Posted by: Kim | April 23, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
No one is saying superdelegates can’t vote for whoever they want. Obama has never said that. He is doing the same thing as Hillary is doing, which is making an argument to them. His argument is that he has the most elected delegates and the most popular vote. Her argument is that if you count 2 states with illegal elections, one where he wasn’t on the ballot, and don’t count 4 other states, then she is ahead in popular votes. That is the difference. She is behind in the election, so her argument is very strained. No one is saying superdelegates won’t decide. The question is about the rationale that they should use, and this is the best she can come up with. Only count some of the votes, and then she can somehow get ahead.
Posted by: Dan | April 23, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Hillary’s argument about winning Florida is just bogus. I live in Florida, and I, like millions of Americans around the country support Obama’s message of changing the way business is done in Washington passionately. Despite this, I didn’t vote during the Florida primary because it was widely publicized that our votes wouldn’t count. In fact, I remember telling to my wife that I didn’t understand why anyone was voting because it didn’t really count for anything. The candidates didn’t even campaign here in Florida. So how can Hillary now claim she won Florida? If Obama had campaigned here and the vote would have mattered I and perhaps many others would have gone out and voted for Obama. The actual vote tally therefore is not valid. And don’t even try it with Michigan where Obama wasn’t even on the ballot. Hillary is old politics: political chicanery, lies and empty promises. END THE DRAMA -
Posted by: Maximo | April 24, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
ah someone said Hillary cant buy votes well apparently Obama did… Clinton is doing it the fair way… did you see the african-americans behind Hillary last night (one with the boxing gloves and behind Obama in is strange speech to himself…. he had 4 people near each other with abercrombie&Fitch shirts on… thats what they are about rich spoiled younger people… I know its more diverse than that but thats the constituency and if their parents are convinced by them to vote for BO then they are not very smart financially or otherwise!
Posted by: Stan Grose | April 24, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Uhm John… News flash, Hillary insulted me. She flatly said she didn’t need the black vote. She also little states didn’t matter. States like Indiana and NC, and now she cries because she can’t catch up. You guys are incredible to vouch for the clintons. Please, please, please, research this woman…everything from Nafta (which is why we’re in a recession, gotta love that experience) the war, (Bosnia bombings), Bin Laden and why bill let him go twice, China and the nuclear weapons sold, Cafta, Peter Paul vs Clinton in september, too many to list. Barack is a saint because he could have destroyed her by now, but, he’s tried to hold the party together, the republicans will not be that nice, they are praying that hillary is the nominee. If you think for one second a true republican will vote hillary, your dreaming.
Posted by: Kim | April 24, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
JR–YOU WRONG! REPUBLICANS BEEN ASKING FOR BLACK SUPPORT FOR YEARS. NOW ITS MIGHT BE TIME TO SWITCH OVER AND GIVE THEM A CHANCE. BLACKS WITH REGULAR REPUBLICANS VOTERS WILL BE A MASSIVE DEFEAT FOR HILLARY. YES WE CAN! LETS DO IT!
Posted by: READY999 | April 24, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
wait a minute!!!! … that is reverse racism…. Hillary never brought up race Obama did well his evil rove/Cheney like surrogates did… honestly…..just to vote en masse cause hes black… I wish you would look at the issues…. and sleeze in poltics has no place so Rezko and ayers black panthers etc… I mean this operation reminds me of the movie denzel washington made about the black gangs of NY in the 70s … which if you read BOs book he was livign around that kind of enviornment at Columbia and sought out the radical militant african americans because he was insecure being mixed…Obama will never be president!
Posted by: Stan G | April 24, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
If Obama hadn’t manipulated the system to eleminate every other candidate off the ballot in 1995 except for him he would not even be a candidate for the nomination today.
John and Carol are right he picks and chooses the rules that suit him.
The voters in FL and MI are victims of the GOP and a idiot DNC who thought it was better to ignore voters than work with them.
Once the date for the first primary is set then all primaries thereafter should count. The voters are a victim of ego.
Posted by: RD | April 24, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
As a voter, I feel that all the candidates deserve to be treated equally by the press and in the debates. This is not happening today. When one candidate is shown favoritism by the media in the debates and press coverage, then it is the right thing to do to stand up and point this out. SNL even did a skit on the blatant favoritism. Senator Obama has benefitted from the massive media coverage of his campaign and the press handles him with kid gloves. While Hillary did not receive fair coverage in the camapaign contests, McCain has received even less coverage. McCain hasn’t complained yet because he should win the Republican nomination.
Posted by: Jilly | April 24, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Dan, the African American vote in the GE accts for around 14%, its not that big of a percentage. Hillary will be a lot more electable because of the middle class blue collar voters that she has carried in every state, as well as the Catholic vote. The African Americans are going to vote for Obama no matter what. If they stay at home and don’t vote for Hillary, thats not a GREAT loss, it just shows their racism. Get ready to say Madame President ! Hillary 08 !
Posted by: Jack | April 24, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
I am voting for Mrs. Clinton in NC!
I am black and I can clearly see that Obama can not win in November!
I hope my sisters will do the same!
A woman president in 2008!
Posted by: Ilene, The balck woman | April 24, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
JACK–ITS SHOWS RACISM GOES BOTH WAYS–BLUE COLLAR AND CATHOLIC CANT VOTE BLACK!
Posted by: READY999 | April 24, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
“I’m sure it would be a much different outcome if the election were held today in those two states”
Then Barack needs to tell his lawyers to stop blocking revote efforts.
He doesn’t want the original votes to count and he doesn’t want revotes (I guess because he’s not confident in his ability to win). He just doesn’t want those voters to count, period.
Posted by: mr | April 24, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
The theory I heard late last night was that there are two divergent groups that voted in PA as well as the rest of the country so far one will vote Democratic at all cost(Obamakins) and one will vote for the best candidate to lead the nation … yes no matter what the fallout… it made me angry when Obama said people fell through the cracks of the Clinton administration… the poor man was under attack from the conspiracy people for 8 years… where as we cant even investigate Bush ergo… with Obamas tactics it looks and sounds like W Bush…if it looks like an elephant and is in the room… well…
Posted by: Stan Grose | April 24, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Kim
I am black – Where did HRC say Black people don’t count???? Obama plays us constantly. One minute he doesn’t care he is of colour next minute its all about his life as a black man.
If Obama is a saint you need a refresher course on saintliness – there are none so blind a those that cannot see.
Obama is not the role model for my children I want. I want a man like their father someone without a chip on his shoulder.
Posted by: RD | April 24, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
I am from Montana,
I see Clinton signs at everywhere!
Montana for Hillary!
Please Indiana carry it on for us!
Posted by: Shelia, | April 24, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Hillary has lostr so many contests.. now she is saying the tide has turned.. yes the tide has turned. the race is over.. Hillary-Huckabee go home
Posted by: Jim | April 24, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Jack,
That isn’t true because of 2 things.
1)McCain will take a sizable chunk of the blue collar vote. Republicans usually do.
2)Obama will have an opportunity to make inroads there. If the first viable African-American candidate wins the votes, and then the nomination is given to someone else (especially given Bill Clinton’s not so subtle racial comments), you can kiss that goodbye.
While African-Americans make up 14% of the electorate, they vote 90% Democratic. That is a lot of votes that you are giving up. More so than the blue collar votes. Losing 10% of your base in the party is fatal. That is what will happen if Hillary snatches this nomination.
Posted by: Dan | April 24, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Astute political observers know that the PA primary result was really about something we dare not admit but sense intuitively: The so-called older white vote supporting Hillary are largely people who will not support a black president. Rendel even admitted as much publically. This constituency will vote for McCain before Obama if Hillary is not the nominee and I fear this may be true of many Hillary supporters come the General Election. Blacks have taken disproportionately to Obama and this is partly the counter balance vote to that. Unfortunately, an Obama-Clinton marriage would be a disaster because they clash in every way that matters. This election is about the old school versus the new school. Its time to pass the torch again America!
Posted by: feral_man | April 24, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
“The DNC rules say the person with the most delegates wins… period.”
Sorry, those are not the rules. The rules are whoever reaches the magic number (right now about 2025) wins. If no one does, then the Supers weigh in. If the Supers want to take the Pop vote into account (the TRUE will of the people) when deciding who to vote for, then so be it.
Posted by: mr | April 24, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Anyone saying the Florida and Michigan contests were actually contested properly is just lying. Those are two of the four states where more Republicans voted than Democrats, the other 2 being Arizona and Utah. It clearly had an effect on the vote. Those results are fraudulent.
Posted by: Dan | April 24, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Senator Clinton has been unfairly vilified by the Republicans and now the Obama supporters are picking up that rant to support their candidate. The Senator actually is a very nice person who inspires great loyalty from those who work with her. Obama will never be able to deliver to the extent that he has created a messiah like personality but has no real experience. Factcheck.org says S. Clinton has more experience and I guess that makes it a fact. Plus, I have a hunch that her husband might be willing to give her a few pointers if she needs them. Obama cannot win in the GE. NC Republicans are already running Rev. Wright ads to wreck the credibility of local democratic officials that endorsed him. So besides going down himself for his poor choice of Reverend, he’s also going to take down those poor Democratic officials that supported him. Obama needs to step down now before he causes the loss of Democratic officials throughout the country.
Posted by: Jkr | April 24, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Newjersey dude,
Do you think Hillary wants to become a VP of Obama?
She would work harder than him as the president himself.
She would handle everything better than him.
He already said it on the interview he will need somebody more experience than him to handle everything.
If that is the case why would people choose him to become a president?
Posted by: crisis08 | April 24, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Many black people will stay home if Clinton gets the nomination.
Alot of these people have never turned out to vote before and only turned out for a black candidate
Alot of people have voted who haven’t previously because of the war.
Alot of people are voting for the first time because of the economy especially gas prices and sub prime rates.
We have huge voter turn out just to send a message to Bush.
All voters count but don’t go trying to scare people into believing only Black voters influence an election.
Lets not forget based on theses scare tactics if all the white voters are simply voting for Clinton based on race/gender than Obama is truly screwed in an election.
Posted by: RD | April 24, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Dan, FL is a closed primary state. Where are you getting your information?
I live in FL, and we did not have a large number of people changing their party affiliation prior to the primary. And if you recall, the republican nominee had not been decided so the republicans were not about to throw away their vote by raiding the Dem primary. It was a legitimate election certified by our Secretary of State.
Posted by: factfinder19 | April 24, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Cookie, if you love Mr. Smiley so much, you should learn his name. It is Tavis, not Travis.
Posted by: Dan | April 24, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Hillary is the singular most divisive candidate in the U.S.
She is dividing the democratic party, and garnering republican votes in the democratic primaries. (8% of her vote in Texas was from republicans…they know she can’t possibly beat McCain…just ask…)
She needs to quit for the sake of having a democratic president.
We need unity and change.
Not clinton.
Posted by: divisive | April 24, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Republicans are attacking Obama relentlessly and holding fire on Clinton because they want to face the Clintons in the general. The Clintons can never win a general election in this country again. They are congenital liars and fraudulent.
Bill is still in the business of pardoning felons and FALN terrorists for political advantage and cash. Have they returned the plates they stole from the White House on their way out?
Posted by: Nancy | April 24, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
I was disappointed at the inaccuracy of ABC.com with the following sentence:
“The junior Senator from Illinois also complained about his rival’s approach to their nomination fight.”
Unless I’m mistaken he is a freshman Senator. Experience is a major part of this Democratic campaign and it would only be fair to present his national credentials factually.
Posted by: Travis | April 24, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
If this fool gets the Dem nomination I will not be voting Democrat in November. I would love to hear some soundbites from Obama about the counting of votes in regards to the fiasco in the 2000 presidential election. The man is a hypocrit.
I just find it hard to believe that any party would want to disenfranchise voters.
Are you ready for 8 more years of Bush?
Posted by: dk | April 24, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
To Dave Stir, TX | Apr 23, 2008 5:00:51 PM
You write: “The DNC rules say the person with the most delegates wins… period.”
I think you are mistaken, or are you deliberately lieing.
The DNC rules I know say the candidate with 2,0025 delegates wins, period. Otherwise its up to the Super Delegates, as “mr | Apr 24, 2008 12:24:56 AM” rightly points out. Now the SD’s can take Obama’s lead into account when deciding who they think will make the best candidate in the GE, but they can (and should) also factor in Obama’s worrying inability to win in crucial states, and among crucial constituencies. Maybe they will decide that his lead is the single most important fact, but maybe they will give other factors greater weight (like the probable vote of the elderly, latinos, working-class dems etc). Nothing in the DNC rules says that they can only take Obama’s somewhat dubious lead into accoutn, a lead in a race he did not actually win.
A
Posted by: John | April 24, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
It’s interesting how a victory by somewhere around 9.4% on ABC News becomes a “Double Digit” victory for Clinton…
Generally “Double Digit” actually means over ten. You can’t count the decimal as a digit.
More Fuzzy math for Hillary. Woo-hoo!
Posted by: splunge | April 24, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
factfinder19,
Florida being a closed primary state has nothing to do with what I stated. I stated that it was one of 4 states where more Republicans voted than Democrats.
I get my facts from the facts. For a factfinder, you have all the facts wrong. Look at the votes cast in that state. More people voted in the Republican primary than the Democratic Primary. That is a fact. Here are the numbers:
Democrat votes: 1,684,390
Republican votes: 1,920,350
Given that there has been significantly higher turnout on the Democratic side this year, telling people their vote didn’t count clearly effected turnout. As I stated only Michigan (another did not count election), Arizona (McCain’s home state) and Utah (huge Mormon population) had a similar trend. I didn’t say Republicans were voting in the Democratic primary, I said that a crapload of Democrats didn’t vote because they were told their vote didn’t count. That is irrefutable. So, how can you count tainted numbers?
And the Republican nomination was not decided yet. It was not decided until after Super Tuesday. The Florida primary was in January (which is why it was deemed illegal by the DNC).
Posted by: Dan | April 24, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Hillary is a fake. I don’t see how any of you could support her. Just look at how she’s trying to destroy Obama by referencing Farrakan, blowing all his statements out of proportion, praising McCain and morphing into a local at every stop and in every state. This is right out of the Karl Rove handbook! She has no regard for the Dem party going down if Obama wins. I actually think she’ll vote for McCain if Obama beats her.
Posted by: Max | April 24, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Travis,
A state has two senators… the one who most recently joined the senate is indeed generally referred to as the “junior senator.”
Yikes… I’m actually defending the accuracy of ABC on something!
That being said, 9.4 still does not equal 10.
Posted by: splunge | April 24, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am
I just saw the new GOP ad released in North Carolina today attacking Obama and his relationship to Wright…..WOW ! This ad is RIGHT ON TARGET ABOUT OBAMA….if they play this ad over and over again, there is NO WAY Obama will carry North Carolina….Dems will rush to vote for Clinton.
Posted by: jack | April 24, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Dan, How can you say the numbers are tainted? We had a record turnout for primary voters (both rep and dem). I’d like to know where you got your numbers, because over 1.7 million dems voted on Jan 29 including myself. If we had access to the voter rolls, I bet you would find that the people who CLAIM that they didn’t vote because they it wouldn’t count are people who never vote in the primaries anyway. Lame excuse!!
Posted by: factfinder19 | April 24, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Hm.
I sit here gravely worried. The last two elections were for the Democrats to lose, and they did magnificently. This is no different.
We are seeing a person who has the courage to have a vision and new ideas getting beaten down by a person who claims to have experience…which is odd to me because the experience mentioned here got us to this sad state of affairs in the first place.
Furthermore,the person who has experience is doing whatever she can to get this nomination. Whether it be by pushing for primaries that were ruled null (sorry but rules ARE rules), or by questioning whether or not the other can win the votes of the states she won. No offense, she can’t win with just the states she won, no matter how she states it.
And her dismissal to her Bosnia sniper story while at the same time tearing into the ‘bitter’ comment? Pretty two-faced, if you ask me. But I guess that’s politics.
My vote will be placed in May in NC. And I know where I stand. My vote is for Obama, and if Hillary sways the Democrats to support her for the nomination, then I haven’t a choice.
I’ll vote for McCain.
Posted by: Joe M | April 24, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Factfinder,
Those are the voter returns. Go to any website and look up the Florida vote count. It is not people claiming they voted, those are actual votes. More Republicans voted than Democrats, which is proof that the vote count was tainted. Why is this so hard to understand? Of course record Republicans turned out, their primary was counted. That is the point. Same goes for Michigan. I am also from Florida, and leading up to the election, Democrats were repeatedly told their vote wasn’t going to count. Then, more Republicans voted than Democrats, and you are trying to tell me that telling people that their vote isn’t going to count doesn’t effect who voted? That is just asinine.
Posted by: Dan | April 24, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT MI.AND FLA.:
What Hillary has “forgotten” to include in her tale of “outrage” at the disenfranchising of the voters of those states is that she, HILLARY CLINTON, had no problem signing a pledge BEFORE she fell behind in the campaign, agreeing to punish MI.and FLA. by NOT campaigning in either state as
THEIR VOTES WOULD NOT COUNT.
SHE WAS FULLY AWARE of the DNC’s foolish decision, but did not protest it because she thought she wouldn’t need those votes. She and Barack both signed the pledge.
It was only when she found herself trailing Obama by 750,000 popular votes and by 161 pledged delegates that her outrage for the people of MI. and FLA.’s disenfranchisement grew. Hmmm.
That is the whole truth. Draw your own conclusions. By the way, Sen. Clinton has been statistically out of this race for the past 6-8 weeks — yet, she continues to campaign aggressively and negatively, as though she had any possibility of catching up to Obama. She does not. She gained a mere 13 pledged delegates in her “big” win in PA. Now she only needs 149 MORE pledged delegates to catch up, plus half a million more popular votes. That is a statistical impossibility, a fact that the media did not reveal until AFTER the PA. election results were in.
So how many women voted Women’s Lib, thinking Hillary had a genuine chance of winning? And why would the media mislead the public so by portraying the race falsely as “close,neck-and-neck”?
Trying to be “fair”? or trying to influence the election?
Posted by: Marilynn | April 24, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
To Joe M:
RE: “I’ll vote for McCain”.
Please do. It only shows you are more loyal to some vague image of a man, than to the ideas central to the Democratic party. Personally, I will vote for whichever candidate the Dems nominate.
I do find it curious that Obama supporters charge Hillary with destroying the party, but then turn around and threaten to defeat the party if their man doesn’t win by any means necessary. “I’ll vote for Mcain”, indeed! The man will continue the war in Iraq indefinitely, make tax-cuts for the super rich permanent, is 100% anti-abortion, and has no plans to reform healthcare. What kind of Democrat are you?
Also: Obama supporters celebrate “a person who has the courage to have a vision and new ideas”. Please, what exactly are these new ideas? All I ever hear is CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE. But that is not an idea, that is what you get when you split a dollar bill at the gas station.
Posted by: John | April 24, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Good thought…”PA Is Clinton Country” I have a Bachelors and spent a semester overseas and might get my masters eventually and there are educated people that support Hillary… and those abercrombie&FItch manicans up on the risers behind Obama last night as so contrary to the image that Obama wants to portray right now… it was absolutely hysterical!!!
Posted by: Stan G | April 24, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
I want to have my vote count too. I didn’t vote because I thought it wouldn’t count. Only in a democratic land do we deal with nonsense. Clinton can lie,cheat, steal,and somehow it’s okay with us. Where are our morals? She didn’t care about me or you until she realized she was losing. Now she’s our champion for counting votes. She will do the same thing in the white house. Get us all stirred up when it suits her, and sadly some of us are not smart enough to see or care about’s what’s going on.
Posted by: Fl voter | April 24, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Charles Penn: Hillary didn’t bring up Farrakhan in the debate, the moderators did. Hillary did say that she would not accept the endorsement of someone who is racist and anti-semitic. Can you blame her for saying that? Obama himself agreed after much prodding, and denounced Farrakhan, himself. So, what did she do wrong with regard to Farrakhan?
Posted by: Fred | April 24, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Dan, If so many dems stayed home, then why did we have a record turnout on Jan. 29????(Miami Herald 1/28/2008) If you truly do live in FL, then be honest, why did so many people come out to vote on Jan 29? If you really live in FL you will know the answer.
Posted by: factfinder19 | April 24, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
What are the rules?
Clinton has NO authority to correct rules.
Was she really some sort of Layer?
Looks like all that she can: to manipulate with people, law, media.
People, what is going on?????
Posted by: Linda,Fl | April 24, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Clearly, Hillary is not trying to “steal” the election. Everyone, Obama and Clinton included, agreed to a set of rules before the process started. Those rules included the following:
1) Florida and Michigan’s delegates do not count.
2) A candidate needs to earn 2,025 (now 2,024 thanks to Joe Lieberman losing his vote) delegates to win the election.
Debating the merits of this system now, and whether it is a good system is futile. If you want to change it for 2012, fine. For this year, those are the rules and they should be adhered to.
Now, Obama will finish clearly ahead in the pledged delegate count (probably 150 or so). But he WON’T reach 2,024. If she can convince enough superdelegates to overturn that margin and get her to 2,024, she has legally won this nomination. Those are the rules. Only a moron would deny that fact.
Her problem is that there are only 300 or so undecided superdelegates, and she will need to convince 70% or so of those to vote for her. That is daunting for her since the natural tendency is to support the people’s votes, and he is ahead on those rubrics. So she needs a cogent argument, and the 2 I see being put forth with regards to winning “important” states (not true, he has won Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Missouri which are also important) and that she is ahead in the popular vote (not true because she is counting 2 elections that she agreed wouldn’t count and not counting 4 other states which do count) aren’t strong enough. She needs him to implode.
Posted by: Dan | April 24, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Obama ran attack ads against Clinton in PA, but she did not even run one against him … what does this tell you? Also, what the Obama campaign did to Bill Clinton was brutal and ruthless … they built the whole racist charge against him to get black voters for Obama … and they got them … but he still can”t win in the big states … because everybody except the elitist-white-wine-leftist-liberals are on to him! The audacity of a dope … he did it to himself when he tried to do it to Bill Clinton!!
Posted by: Jesus Francisco Cardenas | April 24, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
its not that yes we can its Yes ‘She” will!!! just keeping his vote totals down in WNC will have the same effect that Mayor Nutter did in Philly keeping Obamas vote to 60-40 Clinton will win… I am part of the 30 Percent that wont vote for Obama regardless in the GE! Mccain is fine with me… btw Ive already voted for Hillary in early votign .. we will shock the world period!!!
Posted by: Stan G | April 24, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Factfinder,
No one is claiming that people did not come out to vote. The question is whether or not telling people that their vote did not count effected voter turnout. Because, if it did, you can’t really count that popular vote as an accurate indicator. Clearly, it did effect the vote since more Republicans turned out than Democrats. That is all I am saying.
Anyone claiming that telling people that their voted doesn’t count doesn’t effect voter turnout is just full of crap.
Posted by: Dan | April 24, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Obama is the one handing the White House to McCain. The candidate has fatal flaws and just a few have surfaced recently. He will have to hide from debates(the last one made him look like an idiot so they can’t risk another) and reporters questions for the remainder of the contests.
Posted by: dgh | April 24, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
To Dan:
Thank You! That is the sort of argument I want to hear from a fellow Democrat. Neither Hillary nor Obama has a lock on the nomination. Supporters of both candidates should remember the criminal regime we are actually trying to upend. Hillary has some arguments in her favor, Obama has many powerful arguments in his. But let the Super Delegates decide according to their best lights wno can win the election, without fear that supporters of one or the other candidate will defect if the final decision goes against their candidate. Keep the party united!
DEMOCRATS IN ’08! An end to Republican’s mismanagement of this country.
Posted by: John | April 24, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
People, check your facts: HRC won by less than a 10 point margin, and in fact picked up only 9 delegates.
Posted by: munk | April 24, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Obama cannot get to 2024 without all of the remaining Sds therefore he doesnt have it locked up now and there have been in fact elected delegates that went for Obama originally that have been sent to the convention as Clinton delegates when they were elected at the state conventions etc and the SD have a right to overturn the popular vote with their votes to ratify the convention… and I think Clinton will be leading in the popular vote it is the reverse of 2000 but thats the breaks…
Posted by: Stan G | April 24, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
Kenya I understand your sentiments about Iraq but BO cant change the dynamic more than CLinton or Mccain can on Iraq..I have voted for every Dem nominee since I voted first in ’88 and most I kn ew were too liberal to win the GE but I voted for them anyway… this time I simply cannot do whether that makes me a racist or a republican or what its a matter of relevance with Rev Wright and all the other stuff as to Obamas judgement… he simply cannot be allowed to be the president but the will of the people will heard… Im betting Mccain will win that vote so I cant lose… but Hillary still is right on the issues and we need to get away from being ostracized as effete and too liberal as Democrats .. Obama is more of the same period!
Posted by: Stan G | April 24, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
I am just a little old white lady in Indiana.
Obama will get my vote. I don’t want the Clintons back in the White House they did too much damage the last time around.
Posted by: deanna | April 24, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Bag, lets just say that it won’t be Obama sleeping in the White House at 3:00am. I almost hope he wins the nomination so I can vote against him twice. I can’t wait to hear his concession speech. Maybe he should start working on it now. Make sure he has a teleprompter!!
And by the way, I am a life long democrat who would never vote for him. Face the facts, he will never win in the GE.
Posted by: factfinder19 | April 24, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Factfinder you have it right… he cant win the GE so the SD and the over all math (i.e.) popular vote will go to Clintons favor cause Obama has too many skeletons now and none of his suppoorters know or care about any of his issues
Posted by: Stan G | April 24, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
To George:
I actually support Obama. So you’ve pegged me wrong there. I have been trying to make a more general point, that I wish that the more vociferous Obama supporters would stop arguing Hillary is trying to “steal” the election taking her arguments to the Super Delegates. I don’t actually believe (pace Dan’s comments) that her arguments are that convincing, but I think she has a right to make them, and those Democrats who really care about victory in the GE should stop vilifying her for making them. The more rapid Obama supporters (and Hillary supporters) seem more bent on their candidate winning, then our party’s victory, through whichever candidate, in the GE.
Incidentally, there is another “John” on this blog. So, I havent’ been writing all of the entries signed under that name. I have written all of those suggesting that, since neither candidate has locked the nomination according to the rules, we should let them make their best arguments to the Super Delegates, and then let the SD’s decide which candidate is most likely to win in the GE.
I’d prefer if one or the other had in fact won outright. In fact, I’d prefer if Obama had won outright. But he hasn’t. I wish others who support him would quit threatening to destroy the party.
Posted by: John | April 24, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
John …
Obama is inspiring… and its like Hillary said one of them who werent considered citizens by the founding fathers will get the nomination… I know all the issues cause I keep up with whats going on… my argument is with the Obama people that feel the need to destroy peoples character even though they cant defend their candidate… that thing John Stewart did on the daily show tonight likening hillary to the Star Wars death Star was apalling… it was clever but apalling
Posted by: Stan G | April 24, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am
John………. I’m a lifelong Dem I will not, under any circumstances vote for Barack Obama in the general election. Now granted, I’m not silly enough to vote for John McCain but I will go 3rd party.
You can say all you want about me being a “real Democrat” but first and foremost I’m a REAL AMERICAN who has every right to vote as I choose and to follow my heart when my party, and it’s candidate, craps on my head, doesn’t count votes, and quells the voice of American citizens. I have a problem with that and had it happened in South Carolina or another state with a large black contingency then Mr. Obama would be screaming foul from here to the convention. I’m sorry but I can’t support that type of attitude or hypocritical candidate.
Posted by: dk | April 24, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
thats exactly right dk… to alot of americans still to vote … voting for Obama will be unamerican to them so they wont do it!
Posted by: Stan G | April 24, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
Everyone was told to vote by the Florida Democratic Commitee. It was on the TV and all the newspapers. If you didn’t show up to vote, you didn’t care.
There was an important tax issue that everyone needed to vote on also. There was an excellent turnout of voters in Florida. Obama rans ads here, Hillary did not.
Posted by: dgh | April 24, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
So now Obama wants to decide which voters should count? So for him people of Florida and Michigan are not important, small town people and people without degrees are not important? He cannot be Presdent of a few. We need Hillary Clinton, a President that will fight for all Americans.
Posted by: felixdiaz1 | April 24, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
DK
I am reassured:-)
Personally, I support Barack Obama (with reservations), but I could also support Hillary (with greater reservations). My remarks impugning your Democratic credentials were in reaction to your saying you would vote for John McCain. I like and respect John McCain, I think he is a true American original – A maverick. But I think his politics are appalling, and his election would be a disaster for the country. I cannot imagine any Democrat – Hillary supporter or Obama supporter – ever voting for him. I can them voting for some other third party candidate. Though honestly, when it comes to their policies, are they that different?
In any event, I wish you well, and meant no offense. I am now going to get some sleep ;-)
Posted by: John | April 24, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
I never said I would vote for John McCain, it was another poster who made that statement. I just didn’t appreciate your insinuation toward another person that should be automatically expected to tote the party line. That is exactly what is wrong with politics in this country. It’s that attitude that has led to the polluted political air we are forced to inhale. I will vote 3rd party in November with absolutely no reservations at all. And if John McCain wins so be it. I will sleep soundly that night.
Posted by: dk | April 24, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
Edit:
I can understand Hillary supporter or Barack supporter voting for some other third party candidate, rather than the rival – but honestly, when it comes to Clinton’s or Obama’s policies, are they that different?
My main hope remains that we can get past the personalities of these two candidates, and remember what we all seemed to know only 12 months ago – “Either of them on their worst day will be better than Bush on his best day”
Posted by: John | April 24, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
Yea Mccain would be fine by me I detest the Obama supporters saying I have to support theiir candidate .. I dont!
Posted by: Stan | April 24, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
That is true about both of them being better than Bush however a vote for Mccain will deny Obama the White House and even though Obama and Clinton are similar its the tone and the lack of policy… you cant win on personality alone…
Posted by: Stan | April 24, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am
Stan G.
You make a lot of sense sometimes. You are deeply troubled, as am I. It’s hard to believe the people on this website who are SO negative about Obama. What is that? Could it be anything other than racism? Someone said that Hillary can lie, cheat, steal, shamelessly beat up on Obama in what-passed-for-a-debate the other night. The first hour of a two-hour “debate” consisted of Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos, who was campaign mgr. for Bill Clinton for years, spent the hour, aided and abetted by Hillary, bringing up the flagpin thing, the pastor thing, the bitter thing — all the nonsense we’ve heard AD NAUSEUM – dragged thru the mud all over again. They had set a trap for him…right before the PA. election.
WHERE WAS THIS QUESTION: “Hillary, the election is statistically OVER — you canNOT mathematically catch up with Obama or even begin to! IF YOU WIN PA., you’ll gain only 10 – 12 delegate votes. You need 161 to break even with Obama. He has 750,000 more popular votes than you. SO WHY ARE YOU STILL IN THE RACE WHEN YOU KNOW YOU HAVE NO CHANCE OF WINNING? It’s too late, Hillary. The game is over – it’s been over for 6-8 weeks. Yet, you continue to pretend there’s a chance you can win, dealing body blows to your Democratic opponent with every breath you take. WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS?”
Where was that question, please? Why wasn’t it forthcoming from Charlie or George. Her behavior has been so outrageous, I have nothing but contempt for her. And I used to be a big Bill Clinton fan. Hillary cares not a whit about the Democratic Party, about those poor folk in PA., nor about the country-at-large. Alas, it is crystal clear that she cares only for HILLARY!
Wake up, people. She will lie, cheat, and charm her way thru the White House, just like George Bush. We couldn’t trust her to tell us the truth about a situation. She will admit NO MISTAKES. Remember?
It’s truly sad. She is shameless and will destroy the Democratic candidate and party to get what she wants.
Marilynn
Posted by: Marilynn | April 24, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
No, I don’t think anyone needs to tote a party line. However, I do suspect someone who says they would rather vote for McCain rather than Obama or Clinton may not appreciate how radically, dramatically OPPOSITE his politics are from either Barack or Hillary. Parties, and party affiliation are merely shorthand for expressing those profound ideological differences. I don’t think many Republicans will vote for Obama or Clinton, not because I expect party loyalty of them, but because I assume they don’t actually share the ideas embodied by the Democratic party. That was all I meant when I asked (I forget who it was…) what kind of Democrat they were when they said they’d rather vote for McCain if their preferred candidate didn’t get the nod from the DNC.
Posted by: John | April 24, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Marilynn… spouting those numbers doesnt matter…. I trust Obama less than Hillary and quite a few other working class people feel the same way… Obama is clearly less qualified so therefore people will make sure he will not win the GE if he is nominated .. end of story
Posted by: Stan Grose | April 24, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am
Shame.. for shame on anyone that would deny counting the vote of any state! Any attempt to deny a citizens vote, is an assault on democracy itself. The very foundation of this country is being attacked. The common thread that binds all of us together is this very principle,
Posted by: JDinPA | April 24, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am
JDinPA…
yeah thats right and the frontrunner for the nomination associates with radicals and some have said that the artwork on his posters have something to do with radical socialism in other countries.. there are strange combinations of people upset over an Obama eventual nomination but it is ok to be concerned about such things
Posted by: Staniam | April 24, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am
Mathemathically speaking Obama has zero chance winning against Mc Cain
Posted by: ruthmatters | April 24, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am
Everyone wins this way.
Think about it.
The voters knew their state wouldnt get any delegates. They also KNEW that they could still vote. They also KNEW the vote would be counted and tallied.
So why did they bother? Because they wanted their voices heard. Regardless if the DNC threatened to strip the delegates. They wanted to support their candidate. (Or vote non commited)
Now it might be all fun and games for you jerks who got elect delegates. Its easy for you to say what counts or not. We in Florida certainly werent amused. We had no say in the matter.
But we went and VOTED anyways.
The thing is that Dean wants to keep Michigan and Florida in the fold.
Obama doesnt want the delegates to count because it would be unfair.
Clinton wants them to count so that she can make an arguemnt.
Dean says they agreed that they would STRIP the delegates.
Well. Let everyone have their way at the same time.
Count the vote – the vote was legal and ratified. The DNC never made any mention of the votes not counting. The deal was they got no DELEGATES.
Dont count the delegates – Obama will be happy because they SHOULDNT count. They must obey the rules.
Dean gets to have a huge nightmare off his hands.
The ‘vote’ WILL COUNT as an arument to super delegates. Thus dean has no issue to solve about them having a ‘meaningfull’ say.
They can then award the delegates as were voted after Obama (or Clinton) after a nominee is picked so they can go to the convention.
Everyones happy.
Posted by: tomdavie | April 24, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am
Dear Superdelegates:
Please END THIS INSANITY. DON’T PERMIT HILLARY TO DESTROY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
IF 60% OF THE DEMOCRATS DON’T LIKE HER, AND 100% OF THE REPUBLICANS HATE HER, THIS MEANS THAT HILLARY IS NOT ELECTABLE.
PLEASE END HILLARY’S REIGN.
Posted by: Prantha | April 24, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am
Several months ago, Michael Moore made the first statement that I have ever agreed with him on. ” Only the Democratic Party is capable of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory!!” It’s certainly starting to look as if Moore was correct !!!
Posted by: Ed | April 24, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am
why are we putting all this effort arguing over the popular vote?
fact is, a HRC supporter said it right. The superdelegates can vote for WHOEVER they want. Therefore all 50 states votes are “dismissed” in this scenario. The longer this goes on, the worse things will get for the Democratic party. About the only thing that can happen good is that now all these long time voters (as well as brand new ones) will begin to see how they really DO matter, even MI and FL regardless of whether their delegates get seated or not will see how important their vote is. There is something inherently motivating about seeing your votes value.
BTW you people realize you dont actually vote for the president. You vote to tell your state how to vote. Its what the electoral college is all about. Its why popular vote in the general election doesn’t matter.
Posted by: hanging chad | April 24, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am
Let me tell you Aussie, I’m an Eagle Scout, former military officer, and through and through American…but there are times when I am embarrassed to carry an U.S. passport. January 2005 was one of those occasions, and I’m starting to feel that way again. You hit the nail on the head. I know there will be numerous people who deny it, maybe they don’t even know it. Then again, slavery apologists didn’t consider themselves racists in 1860 either; it was just the social order of the time. Such is the social order of today, and African Americans are not blind of it. Hillary and her cronies have denigrated African American culture and demographics throughout this campaign, from Rev. Wright to Jesse Jackson to her “I can win without the black vote” comments. They will, by and large sit out the election if Hillary gets the nod.
Ultimately, there is no way Hillary can win in November. She has burned her bridges and ###### off large segments of the electorate. Independents and moderates (like myself) will not vote for her. Republican cross-over votes? Not a chance in hell. And again, the African American vote will largely sit it out. Oh yeah…and her San Francisco comments…surely that did not endear her to the “elitist,” ivory tower left. I would not be surprised if Ralph Nader gets a bump from that one.
So, once again, the math is against Hillary—today, tomorrow, and (if applicable) in November. But delude yourselves all you want Clintonites. I’ll just make sure to stock up on pop-up and Butterfingers as I await the liberal sob-fest come November when McCain is elected while listening to my Canadian friends ask me why we Americans are SO FREAKING STUPID.
Posted by: Gary K. | April 24, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am
I would like Hillary to be our nominee based on various issues.
That said she will not be.
I believe the result would possibly be different if the DNC hadn’t messed up Florida and Michigan. Momentum would have been different leading into other states.
I think Obama gained a large number of earlier voters (not all or even the majority) based on a somewhat romantic image of who they thought he is and what he stood for. Time tells tales and people have a broader idea of him and his positions. I think he would have had lesser results if more was known about him earlier. (just my opinion)
He will win even with superdelegates in June because the delegates know the party would not survive the election if they went against him.
Civil unrest would be the polite assessment of the fallout if they did otherwise.
I no more like Obama holding the free will of the superdelegates to ransom than I would Clinton to bully them into submission.
The rules say they are allowed to vote for what they believe is the right candidate and what is right for the party / country. They do not say they must agree with a,b or c. Otherwise no superdelegate would be able to stand against the current result of their state such as Kennedy or Richardson (and vice versa on Clintons supporters)
I do not loathe Obama but I am not convinced he is the man for the job and I think many others share that view and he may well struggle in the general election.
Posted by: RD | April 24, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am
“Its why popular vote in the general election doesn’t matter.”
Indeed, America have never been and was never intended to be a democracy. Anyone who has studied the Founders can attest to this. At best, we are a quasi-polity.
Posted by: Gary K. | April 24, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am
Indeed..Its funny that the John Adams series was shown during the time of the primaries because it was in fact electors… not evn popularly elected ones that chose the President and Benjamin Franklin was asked what kind of nation should we set up and he said “A republic sir, if you can keep it” also mirroring Barrack Obamas attitude that he can just sweep into officeand change everything… the founders knew that they were better off going on and handing the office to the next person.. because of people constantly trying to undermine them…so things havent changed much in 230 yrs!
Posted by: Staniam | April 24, 2008, 6:25 am 6:25 am
So if Obama is nominated regardless of the popular vote, will he have been “selected, not elected?”
Posted by: We the Sheeple | April 24, 2008, 6:30 am 6:30 am
RD – The DNC didn’t mess up Michigan & Florida. They messed themselves up with their arrogance that the rules didn’t apply to them.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 24, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am
exactly… its the will of the people but the people are indirectly chosing a nominee now..but some of the arcane rules of 200 yrs ago still are in play but thats the way it is… Obama tends to be the candidate of the elitist belt which runs from John Adams territory out of Boston accross the upper midwest and into u geuess it San Francisco where the “bitter” commments where made
Posted by: staniam | April 24, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
ALL THAT FOR TEN DELEGATES?
CBS: Clinton Picks Up 9 Delegates
Hillary it’s over!
Posted by: Carlo | April 24, 2008, 6:44 am 6:44 am
Obama’s pockets filled with mafia money and linked to terrorism have demonstrated to the American people that he is ineligible even to hold a Senate seat. This demonstrate that a better scrutiny needs to be done to avoid crooks into politics who can sell America with the wrong ideas and their innfectiveness. Barack Obama is a closed clased, fortunatelty.
Posted by: MildredN | April 24, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am
“Clinton Picks Up 9 Delegates”
To be fair, this had almost NOTHING to do with the PA delegates. It ironically has to do with her case to the superdelegates that she is more electable. So all this talk from Clinton and her cronies about the will of the people is not even really about the people themselves, but about coaxing a bunch of unelected party elitists to vote for her.
Posted by: Gary K. | April 24, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am
it’s time for the the clintons release their donor list. it seems everyone knows it’s over for hilary except her, a potenial leader who refuses to accept reality is not a wise choice
Posted by: joe | April 24, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
I am alone in noticing that Clinton only scored a 9.4% ie 9% win in Penn NOT 10% as everybody is claiming (I know I’m not – the british press are reporting it as 9%). We were told that if Clinton only managed a single digit win, she’d have to go….and that’s all she did…so why is she still here?
Posted by: Julian Campbell | April 24, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
As a registered voter I am STILL waiting for Obama to say anything regarding HIS policies. Never once has he mentioned anything in regards TO proposals to MAKE CHANGE. He only talks about change but he never talks about HOW he’s going TO CHANGE. He’s great at pointing out what each problem is we are facing here in our fine country and abroad and he’s right when he says “We need change for… fill in the blank with any issue he’s mentioned. If I could ask him a few questions I would like to know How are you going to go about this change with YOUR POLICIES, how are YOUR POLICIES going to affect us as citizens? How can we elect a man that subscribes to the beliefs and preaching of Reverend Wright? I know he says it has nothing to do with his personal views but he sat at the same congregation week after week. Anyway, getting back to more important issues. He will always say he believes Senator Clinton is not right for the job but he never says WHY or HOW he is better for the job as president. He never says why he’s right for the job like we all do when we are vying for a position! He’ll criticize every issue that needs CHANGE but he never says HOW. Why doesn’t he EVER say any of this? Why hasn’t anyone been able to see this? Why hasn’t anyone been able to call this out on him during any debate? I must say he does fine job at letting us all know that he is perfect for the job and that he’s gone through as much as Senator Clinton but he never sites examples like WE do when WE are vying for a job. “Its time to set a strategy” Yes Obama it is but WHAT is YOUR STRATEGY? Come on Obama we need real answers. They are not that difficult! Cain, Clinton, or Obama. I’m still deciding here.
Posted by: Janet | April 24, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Dean 25 super delegates want Hillary to drop out of the win so they do not have to deal with MI and FL. No need to concern themselves with MI and FL if one person is in the win.
Posted by: cookie | April 24, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Carlo… its not over.. nothing concrete will be decided till the convention… the popular vote is only part of the delegate count they stioll have to go to state conventions etc … the tide is turning Obama is not vetted or viable
Posted by: staniam | April 24, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
I am 48 year of age and I called one of the major healthcare provider for basic HMO Insurance. I was quoted a price of $495.00 a monthly.
Posted by: suzy | April 24, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Gary… that is how it will be who can bribe the most politicians to get the most votes at the convention Obama is doing it too because neither candidate can get to 2024 on their own
Posted by: staniam | April 24, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
Before she was behind did she not agree not to count the votes? Interesting that now she cares what the people say.
Posted by: marie | April 24, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Hillary will not drop out and will only be slightly behind Obama in delegates and ahead in the popular vote Gov Dean screwed up and has to be drinking heavily right about now..and regardless of whether it was 10 or 9.2 percent… the media told you she would drop out if she didnt 10 percent but that was not factual the media is an extension of Obamas campaign… Obama cant take the heat cant sit at a regular diner and eat a waffle..rev wright perhaps marxist tendancies etc etc… and look at the polls perhaps we arent scared of mccain winning we are scared of Obam,a winning therefore he will not be elected president !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: staniam | April 24, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Janet-you nailed in on Obama!!His talk of “change” is just that ALL TALK!! There is no substance behind him, yet all of his supporters want to believe so bad that they have stopped any real thinking at this point. How can Obama, as a DC insider himself, enact any real “CHANGE”? The only “CHANGE” we are going to get is a much lighter wallet and no real “CHANGE”. He will blame Congress/Senate when not “CHANGE” happens and laugh all the way to the bank with all of our extra tax dollars!! WE CAN’T AFFORD TO ELECT THIS PHONY!! COME ON FINAL 9 AND SEND THE PHONY OBAMA BACK TO HIS SHADY CHICAGO FRIENDS!! CLINTON OR MCCAIN 08!!!!
Posted by: fairsuperdelegates08 | April 24, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
OBAMA, REPLBLICANS ONLY HOPE.
Posted by: drwfll | April 24, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
yes its a fact 26 percent of people in PA will not vote for Obama over Mccain and another 18 percent said they wont vote if hes nominated tis true.. that is all the need be concerned with its impossible for Obama to win the GE
Posted by: staniam | April 24, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
hilary clinton cant win with only 8% of the black vote either or without the tens of thousand of new voters who registered solely due to obama
Posted by: truth | April 24, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Typos…God I hate typos…Here’s a corrected version:
Hillary has a similar issue as I explained in a previous post.
THe fact is, both the Democratic candidates have an iceberg’s chance in hell at pulling it out in November. Frankly, it’s because Republicans are smarter than Democrats.
Now, before the daggers start flying…think about it. Democrats had the election sewn up a year ago, they could made Mickey Mouse their nominee, and he would have won. The only way the Democrats could lose is if: 1) the Republicans nominated a centrist candidate; 2) the Democrat party split themselves.
A year later…Bibbidi Bobbidi Boo. Both have come true. That is why I say: Republicans are wrong, but smart; Democrats are right, but stupid. It’s harsh, it’s blunt, but nevertheless true. Sorry.
Posted by: Gary K. | April 24, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
That 10-point figure is probably coming from people rounding up percentages to the nearest whole number. The actual figures, according to the Pennsylvania secretary of state’s Web site, are 54.6 percent for Clinton and 45.4 percent for Obama. Doing a little math, that’s a 9.2-point difference. In Clinton’s calculation it is 10, but college graduates considers that it 9. If it was 9.5, it could be rounded!
Posted by: John Elias | April 24, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Obama says that Hillary and Bill were both complaining about the media he knows that the media favors him so why would he complain. The first time ABC held his feet to the fire he was crying uncle. I know that Obama has a PHD, he need to use the Degree that God gave him to figure out he can not win in the general election without MI. and FL. Maybe math is where his weakness is his supporter should pull him to the side and let him in on a little secret. Every one knows that he was the one that stopped the revote with MI and FL, the voters want forget. My best friend it a Obama supporter I don’t hold it against him he told me that Obama should just take his chance with MI and FL seems like Obama took my friends advise. He is so arrogant that he might loose in the general election because he has lose focus on the real goal. Some one should pull his coat tail and let him know what’s going on around him. He is starting to sound like another Bush!
Posted by: Timothy | April 24, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Hillary and Bill are reaching for straws and trying to fool the people in NC and IN it wont work the American people are fed up with the Clintons, Bushs, and the old sneaky McCain Bush want-to-be politics as usually. The American people are to smart for that and will turn the page. The talk radio Conservatives shook Jocks want the American people to believe that their for Hillary but they want the fight between Hillary and Obama to continue until November to try and make McBush look good that want work either.
Obama’s state wins 30 lost 15, Delegate count 1715 +/-, Negatives are way down, Better nominee
Clinton’s state wins 15 lost 30, Delegate count 1685 +/-, Negatives way up. Not a good nominee.
Fund Raising Obama beats Clinton or McCain Expediently.
Registering new voters Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Bring the country together Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Overall, Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Race against McCain, Obama better nominee.
Obama all the way!
Posted by: Lookup | April 24, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
if Hilary debated obama on the issues and did not resort to divisive race baiting, race coding, personal and negative attacks against Obama, she would still lose however, she would at least have her dignity in tact
Posted by: a lady | April 24, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
a lady: I agree 100%!
Posted by: Lookup | April 24, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Gosh, what a whiner Obama is. Votes are votes, and Hillary has more at the moment. Give it a rest already before the country figures out that Obama’s delegates actually represent a much smaller number of votes (because his delegates came disproportianately from caucuses and urban areas which were granted extra delegates).
Posted by: Chris NY, NY | April 24, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
am i hearing correctly? Hillary Clinton the anti-elitist suggesting a select group of super-elitist overturn the people’s democratic choice?
Posted by: superelitist | April 24, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Updated:
Hillary and Bill are reaching for straws and trying to fool the people in NC and IN it wont work the American people are fed up with the Clintons, Bushs, and the old sneaky McCain Bush want-to-be politics as usual. The American people are too smart for that and will turn the page. The talk radio Conservatives shook Jocks want the American people to believe that their for Hillary but they want the fight between Hillary and Obama to continue until November to try and make McBush look good that want work either. The Clintons do a good job of trying to pull the wool over the American people eyes.
Obama’s state wins 30 lost 15, Delegate count 1715 +/-, Negatives are way down, Better nominee
Clinton’s state wins 15 lost 30, Delegate count 1585 +/-, Negatives way up. Not a good nominee.
Fund Raising Obama beats Clinton or McCain Expediently.
Registering new voters Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Bring the country together Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Overall, Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Race against McCain, Obama better nominee.
Obama all the way!
Posted by: Lookup | April 24, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
And to think that Obama and CLinton are the best that the Demo party could come up with.. SUCKERS…
Posted by: Dan Fisher | April 24, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
FOR BKMC,
Since you want to advocate for Obama so bad, possibly you should actually learn about his positions! He wants to give AMNESTY for all illegals and make sure there is no border fence at all! At least Clinton wants border security! Maybe when one of them takes your job, and continues to drive down your wages even more, you won’t be so willing to jump on the Obama bull wagon!
As a lifelong Democrat, if Hillary does not get the nomination, every single Dem I know is voting for McCain! Better the enemy you know than the enemy socialist Obama!!!
Posted by: D.L. | April 24, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
chris, u are a lousy spinner lol. obama is leading in votes even without cacus states, if obama campaigned in florida and michigan he would have brought the margin much closer or even beat her. everyone makes a big deal about hillary’s disputed 9 points win in pa. when obama beats hilary it’s usually by 30 to 20% it’s so common no one seem to bat an eye at the huge margin anymore
Posted by: wiseguy | April 24, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Hillary Clinton is the most ridiculous person I’ve ever come accross. Obama was not even on the ballot in Michigan and unlike her he actually stayed out of Florida. I hope she doesn’t seriously think the American people are this stupid.
Posted by: amy | April 24, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Fred:
You Republicans can do all the calculating you want and planning, your number don’t ad up!!!!!!
Posted by: Lookup | April 24, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
There are several people here confused about caucuses. They think that somehow it does not represent the people. This is far from true. In Iowa where I live, anyone can attend the caucuses if they register for the party. You can register at the time you attend. Both parties held their meetings at the same time so it was impossible to attend more than one meeting. Most people drove themselves to their community location, but both parties and all candidates made sure anyone who wanted to take part got a ride to and from the caucuses. At the precinct I attended here in Iowa, we had to wait in line for an hour to process everyone attending our meeting to confirm they were actually registered and lived in our precinct. Then it was at least another hour of five minute speeches for each candidate, discussion among people standing in your area of the room, and then finally a count. I did not hear anyone bashing any candidate or intimidation of voters. Nor did I hear people complaining about how they were treated. These people lived in your neighborhood and therefore it was a friendly environment. I am not sure why some people think this is somehow not fair.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | April 24, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Hillary distorts the popular vote to her advantage. Example: even though most news reports show Iowa with 940 votes for Obama, it was really 940 county delegates for Obama. The precinct meeting for my neighborhood had about 675 voters. Over 450 of them voted for Obama which ended up counting as 4 county delegates for Obama from our precinct. Hillary received about 210 votes which became 2 county delegates. Hillary knows this, but still addes our delegate count as popular votes because the difference between 4 and 2 is far less than 450 and 210 (that’s just one precinct). Hillary claims that votes count and she has more votes, but in caucuses states they only count the county delegate votes and not the people’s vote.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | April 24, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Each side is going to have its favorites and special states. If you had a state filed with old white women, guess who would win that state, Hillary (Oh that state exist, it’s called Pennsylvania). Likewise, If you had a state filled with Black voters guess who would win that state (see North Carolina results two weeks from now). Hillary argues, “Why can’t he close the deal” I say to you, wait till the NC result and ask “Why can’t she get the Black vote”
AND SO GO THE STATES … DIVERSE
The question you have to ask, WHAT IS THE RESULTS OF THE CUMULATIVE VOTE AMONG ALL VOTING AMERICANS. THAT IS TRULEY YOUR MEASURE.
Right now it is mathematically impossible for Hillary to win this nomination(unless she uses the same fuzzy math calculator Bush has used)
Posted by: spoon2456 | April 24, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
that 25% will storm to the polls and vote for obama when faced with the reality that mccain wants to commit their sons and duaghters to a 100 year war, and obama did not attack hilary personally or negatively, he’s attacked her healthcare policy which is fair game.. bigots who are looking for excuse to vote against obama is doing so solely becuase he is half black
Posted by: realitycheck | April 24, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Now listen all of you, let us for once behave like intellectuals and stop this myopic way of arguing. On the issue of Florida and Michigan all the contestants were called together and they were made to sign an undertaken that there will be no need for you guys to hold elections in those states cos they have violated the rules and whatever election that takes place in those states won’t hold. Obama, Clinton and Edwards, sign and sealed the deal.
Then Hillary was leading in popular votes, delegates counts e.t.c, and she didn’t see the need not to disenfranchise those people, after that, there were other contest and she won before North Carolina contest were Bill Clinton played the race card and Hillary lost and lost as well in super Tuesday before she now resulted back into Florida and Michigan . Foks be reasonable the world is watching us, i am not against sitting delegates from those states but they should be sited in a way that it will not affect either of candidates delegate counts positively, in other words, it should be fifty-fifty (50/50).
Posted by: KC, N.Y | April 24, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, the New Black Panthers Party, Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Larry Leggis, Micheal Moore, the Black Nationalist Movement, MoveOn.Org, Bill Maher, the Weather Underground, Michelle Obama, etc. etc. etc.
Is there a hateful, anti-American person or organization left in the country that Obama is not aligned with yet?
Posted by: Beth | April 24, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Well, let’s see. Obama has a whopping two years of federal experience, most of which he has simply spent posturing and campaigning for the presidency.
Obama’s foreign relations experience consists solely of a trip to Kenya to visit relatives (that’s “foreign relations,” right?).
Obama has a close, 25-year relationship with Jeremiah Wright and the hateful Black Nationalist movement. Then Obama pretends he didn’t know Wright is a bad guy.
Obama has a 17-year relationship with Chicago’s preeminant slum lord and scum bag Antoni Rezko, who helps Obama buy his house. Then Obama pretends he didn’t know Rezko is a bad guy.
Obama launches his state senate campaign with an event at the home of terrorist Bill Ayers, serves on a charity board with Ayers and gives speeches with Ayers. Then Obama pretends he barely knows the guy.
Obama promised us “change” in Illinois too, but has done nothing but cut deals to enrich himself and his wife while cashing our paychecks.
Obama cleverly flips off Clinton during a speech last week and smirks while the crowd cheers.
And the list goes on and on.
Gee, what’s not to like about Obama? Sure, he has experience, character and judgment to be the most powerful leader in the world during these especially challenging times. How tough can it be? LOL
Nobama. Not now. Not Ever.
Posted by: Derrick Rogers | April 24, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Why are we talking about Pastors and who likes Obama? The funny thing about all this is, Hilary has a base of people w/out college degrees..Which would explain the ignorant arguments for her. And as for McCain, he’d be in the hospital by year 2, I mean he is 83 so I’ve heard. Republican’s hate Barack cause he’s young, cocky, and black. Hilary supporters hate him cause he’s a man, with an education. The sweetest/funniest thing is going to be when he wins the Presidency. In reality, there is nothing that the doubters can even do about it. Lets Be Real
Posted by: RackFan | April 24, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I don’t think Hillary deserves to be a President if she can honestly say that Florida and Michigan delegates must be seated despite these States officials had ample warning about the consequences of deliberately voilating the DNC Covention Rules.
Hill is iconic to saying and going along with anything just to win. Bill did it with greater flare and got away with it. I will rather vote George bush again- if it was permissible. At least I know I have a President that sticks to his guns and not a cherry picker.
Posted by: Julian Etim | April 24, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Wow… The language being used to describe PA is simply stunning. I’ve discovered these past few weeks what labels apply to me.
I happen to be describe as racist, whitetrash, redneck hillbilly, and list goes on. These blanket statements that lump my entire state together are ludicrous!
Your candidate failed to understand a great many things about us. My state has one of the highest military enlistment rates. He did not even come close to addressing our pride in civic responsibility. There is a very large block of Catholic voters. Could not connect with them as well.
I’m simply stunned.. every state he looses is where all the racists live. What a fantastic argument! My gosh! My desire to support him in the general election… will NEVER happen. Thanks one and all for playing dirty politics.
Posted by: JDinPA | April 24, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Up until two months ago I wouldn’t have considered voting non-democrat, but these freaking morons have lost me.
The democratic party needs leadership that can knock some heads around. They don’t have it. And these two privileged ivy-league “candidates” can’t do anything but bicker and point fingers at each other.
The republicans were bad for our country, but the worst part is that democrats can’t provide a better solution.
Pathetic.
Posted by: Jay Kraly | April 24, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
This is a reason why he did not get one PA vote. Posted earlier..
“Shame.. for shame on anyone that would deny counting the vote of any state! Any attempt to deny a citizens vote, is an assault on democracy itself. The very foundation of this country is being attacked. The common thread that binds all of us together is this very principle.”
Posted by: JDinPA | April 24, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Why is Hillary still in the race many ask. Well I think that Hillary knows very well what she is doing. “If I cannot win ’08 I will take ’12 from McCain”.
So I need to stay on, even if it is mathematically impossible to get the nomination without alienating half of the country. So let’s go to plan B. Weaken Obama while embittering the Hillarites to give McCain the election in November.
Lets see; Bush approval ratings due to Irak? In the tank. Bush approval ratings on the economy? In the tank, McCain ’12 approval ratings on the same? Ditto. And the winner is Hillary 2012
Posted by: Sergio52 | April 24, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
You do understand that it isn’t Obama’s decision to allow the DNC to seat their delegates?
And the elections, particualrly Michigan, disenfranchised BOTH candidates. Obama wasn’t on the ticket in Michigan, and several thousand supporters of the candidates in Florida were told there votes weren’t going to count, so they stayed home. Both of these would be enough to make a solid legal case of disenfranchisement, it’s akin to the black codes of the 1870s.
Ultimately, the elections were not reflective of the populaces in those states. Anyone who thinks Obama would get zero votes in Michigan, needs to check themselves into rehab for their drug induced stupor. He’d get 50,000 in Detriot alone easy.
Posted by: Gary K. | April 24, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
EVERYBODY WANTS TO STAY ON JERIMIAH WRIGHT ISSUE. WHAT THE H— WAS THAT? I’M SO SURPRISED AT THE BOTH OF THEM BUT ESPECIALLY CHARLIE GIBSON. I KNEW THAT GEORGE USE TO WORK FOR THE CLINTONS, SO I DIDN’T EXSPECT NOTHING LESS FROM HIM.. BUT FOR WHO BARACK ASSOCIATED WITH FOR A MOMENT,OR OCCASION OR TWENTY YEARS AS LONG AS HE HAS NOT COMMITTED ANY CRIME THEN WHY IS IT AN ISSUE? IF THAT’S THE CASE BEING IN THE POLITICAL RING YOUR
GONNA MEET ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE THAT
YOU MAY NOT SEE AGAIN FOR YEARS,MONTHS, ETC,,, WHY DO WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CARE ABOUT WHO KNOWS BARACK OR CLINTON OR MCCAIN FOR THAT MATTER …..GOSSIPING ABOUT THAT IS NOT GONNA BRING ME MONEY FOR GAS OR FOOD ON MY TABLE CAUSE ONE THING FOR SURE THEY GETTING PAID…..DIRTY LAUNDRY OR NOT.
Posted by: 4honey9 | April 24, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Sergio52:
Why would the Party reward her in 2012
with the nomination after sabotaging
Obama’s chances this year?
Posted by: reaganfan | April 24, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Reaganfan
Four years is an eternity in political terms. We have seen many candidates flip on issues and ask forgiveness for previous sins. Just check ANY candidate positions in the primaries vs. general. “Oh I did not mean it then” And they get away with it.
Posted by: Sergio52 | April 24, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I wonder how many Obama voters wish they could take back their vote?
Posted by: geevill | April 24, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
As a black person, I guess I feel like some of you white folks. I will not give Hillary my vote because shee is simply untrusting!
Posted by: 458792T | April 24, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Alfredo
I do not about you. But if in the end the superdelgates will be picking the nominee, then I think we could have all stayed home in the primaries and just do what the party bossed tell us to do in November, and hope our children grow up to be a superdelegate someday.
Posted by: Sergio52 | April 24, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
FIGURES DON’T LIE BUT LIARS CAN FIGURE!
HILLARY HAS BEEN LYING FROM DAY ONE!!
Posted by: jbate | April 24, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
a week of mistep, a bad debate negative attack smear and fear against obama.. pennsylvania democratic establishment, congress men, senator ,100 mayor the govenor of pennsylvania endorsing her, obama was unknown a few months ago in pennsylvanaia while hillary had 20 years of free press. obama had to spend money to get his name out there and with all of the advantage hilary had she won with a mere 9% so who really won??
Posted by: realwinner | April 24, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Obama is a loser, and if the Dem leadership can’t see this, then they are just handing an easy victory to McCain, in their effort to appease the left wing socialists in this country! hillary is our only chance and without her on the ticket, I will be proud to pull that lever for McCain! Let the GOP ruin the country even further rather than let the left crazies take over and run it even further into the ground than the GOP has done! Hillary is the only chance we have to win for the Dems!
Posted by: DL | April 24, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
The only reason Obama is ahead is that lazy and naive Americans voted for him before bothering to check out who he actually is. Now that the media is spoon-feeding them the truth about Obama, they regret their vote. Well, boot to the head! If I could figure out what a nightmare he is months ago and stand against him, so could all the other Americans who were foolish enough to actually vote for him and now regret it. This whole mess can be laid at the door of the manipulative media, the cowardly, pandering Democratic Party and those who voted for an image which is now known to be completely false. Shame on all of you. Now, what are you going to do to fix this mess?
Posted by: Griffin | April 24, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Geevill–I voted for Obama and I don’t regret it for a SECOND. I’d vote for him a thousand times if I could.
If you people don’t want wimps in the White House, maybe you should tell Hillary to stop crying. Sounds like a wimp to me.
For the love of GOD we have had 21 DEBATES already. I watched EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM, except for the last one. I KNOW the candidate’s positions. I KNEW them a long time ago. The only thing anyone can talk about in debates to come is the stuff that doesn’t matter.
In regards to Michigan and Florida. Do you people SERIOUSLY think that Hillary TRULY cares about those people??? NO. If the situation was reversed, she’d be preaching about playing by the rules too. She doesn’t give a DAMN about those people. She just wants their votes.
Her campaign has constantly changed what’s important in the race. When Obama won Iowa, they said it’s a delegate race. When he won more states on Super Tuesday, they said that didn’t matter, because it’s a delegate race. When he came ahead in delegates, they cried that, no, this time it’s about who’s won BIGGER states. Then it was about who could win the states with the most electoral votes in November. THEN it was about the popular vote! They can’t even make up their mind. Whatever they can get ahead in is what the race should count on for them, so that’s why they want the votes of Michigan and Florida counted.
She claims that it’s more “democratic” to let the race continue and let everyone have their say. COUNT ON IT that if she had put this thing away on Super Tuesday like she was supposed to, she would have been calling for an end to this back in February.
Hillary only cares about what can get her a win. She changes her campaign slogan to whatever works best for the state that she’s in. She has connections to whatever state she’s in, “I lived here before,” “I registered voters in this state,” “My great uncle twice removed is buried in this state,” “I had a layover in your airport once.”
She “just forgot” about what she had PREVIOUSLY WRITTEN about her trip to Bosnia. She knew the truth for YEARS and then all of a sudden when it benefits her to lie, she “forgets.” Maybe when she gets to be president she’ll “forget” about what she promised all those people. 60% of people think she’s untrustworthy, so WHY ARE WE TRUSTING HER TO DO WHAT SHE PROMISES? It’s not like she has a good track record for telling the truth.
Obama may not be perfect, and there may be things that he says or did that you don’t like. But at least he’s not going to LIE about it. He wants to bring it out front and TALK about it, but stupid people in this country can’t handle the truth. They think you can just sweep everything under the rug and it’ll just go away. That’s how the problems in this country still exist.
WAKE UP, PEOPLE! The country doesn’t HAVE to be run this way. Vote for Obama and at least we can TRY to make things better. Vote for Hillary and you might as well be voting for John McCain, because nothing’s going to change.
Posted by: Courtney | April 24, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
griffin. the only polls hilary is winning in the untrustyworthy and the uneducated polls, when it comes to lies and deception hilary makes obama look like the second coming.. get use to it..obama will be ur next president, u cant stop a movement.. abc is looking for ratings in all the wrong places, abc should get rid of those outdated diasore commentators, thats a start, i havent watched abc in years
Posted by: abc123 | April 24, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
If Clinton is going to change the rules in midstream, like GW does, then she should announce that none of the Caucuses counted therefore she can manipulate the numbers so she wins the nomination. So how is that any differentthan what Bush does? Doesn’t he manipulate the facts in his favor?
Are we going to have 4 more years of Bush if McCain or Clinton wins???
I think that it is disgusting the way she lies and manipulates everything. She is soooo dishonest!
Posted by: Gerry, Denver | April 24, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
what i do not understand is all this air head complening about florida and michigan
it is not obama’s falut that this two states punshied what yhey do.now clinton’s
bark like a dog everywhere,please for the sake of the party hillary quite now.go away take a long vacation.
Posted by: jose | April 24, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I cannot believe you people call yourselves Americans when you want two states votes to be discounted. I blame the DNC for that; they should never have let that happened. HOWEVER, be that as it may it MOST CERTAINLY was NOT the people living in those states fault that they were put in this situation. EVERY AMERICAN has a RIGHT to VOTE and BE COUNTED. THe DNC made a mess of this and should never had allowed it to come to this. You just simply CANNOT discount 2 entire states votes. THIS IS AMERCIA! How would YOU feel if your vote wasn’t counted? It just isn’t right. I dont make this argument for or against either candidate, simply OUR RIGHT as AMERICANS to vote and have our votes counted!
Posted by: debbie | April 24, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
All I have to say is that if Clinton manipulates the vote in her favor by changing the rules and she wins the nomination in spite of Obama getting the popular vote, most delegates, and most states, then every state in the nation that voted and Obama won will become disenfranchised.
So either Florida and Michigan get disenfranchised or the entire nation gets disenfranchised. What a choice and what a government!
Posted by: Debbie | April 24, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
I’ve got the jelly, where’s Hillary? She toast.
Posted by: jbate | April 24, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Y’all do realize this is over, right?
Posted by: Paul | April 24, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
are you kidding me? only the clintons can be behind in an election and spin it in such a way that the person ahead of THEM has the “problem.” the question is NOT why obama can’t “close the deal.”
the question to hillary is “why don’t you even have a deal to close?” i know! because you’re LOSING!
please. keep these habitual liars out of the white house.
Posted by: criminysakes | April 24, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
it was not a double-digit win in Pa – it was single digit. The Clintons and the media are rounding up when they should not be. 9.2 is not 10. Someone out there should at least try to be truthful. And if I were Obama I would not bother to respond to Clinton’s desperation tactics to count votes in states she agreed in advance would not count. Move on to important issues.
Posted by: bernadette | April 24, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
English is widely spoken and read around the world on the web. I wonder what people in other countries think about the citizens of this country when they read blogs like this. Maybe that all our officials are corrupt, but they are representative of many citizens. Our oggicials and citizens are more interested in themselves than making our country better.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | April 24, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
English is widely spoken and read around the world on the web. I wonder what people in other countries think about the citizens of this country when they read blogs like this. Maybe that all our officials are corrupt, but they are representative of many citizens. Our oggicials and citizens are more interested in themselves than making our country better.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | April 24, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Michiganders thank you for the disrespect, Obama! We’ll remember that in November especially since YOU chose to remove your name from our ballot. Bummer, Hillary gets the delegates!
As far as the party – make the Michigan Democratic Party pay a fine but don’t disrespect the voters of Michigan, they didn’t change the primary date, the party did!!
Posted by: Lisa | April 24, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Lisa,
Sorry to burst the bubble, Your Michigan delegation decided to revolt and move your primary date! They were warned in advance of what would happen if they did. Just because Hillary says it’s Obama’s fault, you really don’t have to believe it. We’d understand if you saw through the smoke and made an intelligent decision at the next election of your DNC state council. Like maybe vote them out for being dumb. The November election, thankfully, doesn’t include your state DNC reps. You can vote for the candidate of your choice. But remember, the candidate had no control over your individual state primary issue. It was just some idiot who couldn’t get a real job!
Posted by: DAVID NH | April 24, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
You people in florida and michigan have only yourselves to blame. why did you move it up anyway you should be outraged with your local governments especially the florida one run by republicans. Her wins in those states don’t mean anything. She agreed they wouldnt count now she needs them she is saying they should. What a disgusting woman and i can’t believe that you people fall for her tricks every single time. What about the people who didnt vote because the dnc told them that their vote wouldnt count. That is disenfrachising millions of voters right there. Just split it 50/ 50 and be done with it. And maybe you people in florida and michigan should have your stuff together next time and stop blaming obama.
Posted by: brian | April 24, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Marilynn, I am 1/2 black and 1/2 latina and proud… and my husband is black, we are both voting for Hillary and we would rather vote for McCain over Obama in the general election.
Does that make me a racist too?
Posted by: Juanita | April 24, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
On the Florida primary vote: I had a prior commitment for the night of the election. I was running late for work the morning of the election. 1) I don’t own house, so property tax vote didn’t affect me. 2) Primary vote doesn’t count anyway because State Democrats voted to change the election date in spite of the DNC rules. Therefore, I didn’t vote. You cannot change the rules now and say that the vote should count.
Posted by: Whatshop | April 24, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
jbate, are you stating that because we are black we are not intelligent?
First, we are not intelligent because we are blindling voting for Obama. And if we vote for Hillary, we are uneducated? You can’t have it both ways.
Maybe you are the racist and feel like to have to overcompensate for your racism by voting for Obama?
I’m intelligent enough to make a combined $200,000 a year, and don’t want to be tax much more… that’s good enough reason for me not to vote for Obama since he will probably be taxing those who make $70,000 and over. Was that good enough for you or should I list you more reasons… I got plenty.
Posted by: Juanita | April 24, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I wish some people and the media would quit harping about Michigan and Florida.
Neither the delegates nor the popular votes of Michigan will be counted!
Neither the delegates nor the popular votes of Florida will be counted!
It doesn’t matter if you think that’s good or if you think that’s bad. That decision was made and it won’t change. Get over it.
You get the feeling that when Hillary loses they will carry her away from the White House gate every day in a straight jacket as she throws ashtrays and shrieks and asks what those people are doing in her house. She may become the Delta Dawn of Pennsylvania Avenue.
Speaking of harping: Has anybody noticed that Mrs. McCain sometimes wears a “Hillary’s Harpy” pin (a harpy eagle on a pearl orb)? Hmm, I wonder. . . Maybe that’s why she doesn’t seem to want to give her hubby any campaign fund money.
This is undoubtedly the silliest time in the history of American politics. I even find myself treating a run for the President of the United States as though it was some sort of American Idol episode. Seriously, aren’t some of the others who ran starting to look pretty good right now?
Try to laugh it off and go back to your jobs—if you are lucky enough to still have one after the last three administrations have sold us out to globalism.
Regards, The Old Prospector.
Posted by: Prospector44 | April 24, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
To Twice:
You are hearing correctly. As things stand, and because of the mess the DNC made of MI & FL there is no such thing as “the people’s democratic choice”. Obama partisans should quit pretending that there is. What “democractic choice” if that choice doesn’t include MI & FL voters?
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
I see that the only one not blamed yet for the situation in MI and FL is the Pope.
Yet the real culprits are seldom mentioned, although we all know who they are: The state democratic party leaders that decided to move up their primary in spite of party rules (disclaimer: whether the current primary rules are fair is another days discussion).
How come they are still in the party having broken the rules? And what on earth made them go ahead with that ill conceived decision? It is easy to think that they just wanted to have a saying in the primaries and not let those guys in IA and NH decide for them. Or were they trying to create momentum for Hillary in two large states where the party leaders are strong Hillary supporters? If you do not believe in momentum, just ask Rudy.
Posted by: Sergio52 | April 24, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
To Sergio52:
Hear! Hear!
The MI DNC party leaders should be tarred and feathered.
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
This country needs Hillary. We need another millionaire president who disregards the rules, tells bold-faced lies, plays dirty, and pretends to care about the middle class. Go Hillary!
Posted by: Angelo | April 24, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
To Angelo:
To be fair: exactly the same could be said of Obama with (minor) changes: another millionaire president who “twists” the rules, tells subtle lies, plays dirty, and pretends to care about the middle class.
He and his proxies deployed a variety of “abstract” arguments to block a revote here in MI. Their arguments weren’t the only reason the revote didn’t happen, but the fact is – he wasn’t interested in seeing a revote happen in MI. He may have suspected the outcome wouldn’t help his case. So he is just as strategic a “populist” as Hillary. He argues in favor of “the common man” when it serves his election chances, and torpedoes their chance to vote when he thinks they might vote against him. Not very noble.
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
What to do, what to do about FL and MI votes??? Here’s a thought: how about those of you who are so self-centered you believe the FL and MI voters should be disenfranchised, i.e., not have their votes count, have to relinquish YOUR voting privilege as well. Then those of us who truly believe in democracy for ALL citizens of this country will rightfully be the ones deciding this contest. What? Don’t want YOUR vote to be thrown out? Don’t want to be told YOU don’t count? Don’t like to be treated the way you treat others? And, please, don’t bother boring me with further convoluted excuses claiming you really are nice people who believe in democracy, but, well…it’s just that they “broke the rules” (!)
Posted by: chichi | April 24, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
ted,, who are u kidding.. there is no way those union fat cats at gm will vote for a union buster like mccain.. keep dreaming buddy.. self-interest trumps all interest
Posted by: getreal | April 24, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
To chichi:
My thoughts exactly. Astounding how Obama partisans from other states get in a lather about their votes “not counting” if the final nomination is left up to the Super Delegates, but they give a damn about MI & FL.
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Again ABC you continue to show your bias. You are the only news organization that has been posting the popular vote including Florida and Michigan all along. You only today posted the numbers without Florida and Michigan. Obama wasn’t even on the ballot for Michigan. You also aren’t including several caucus states that don’t officially release numbers. But there are accurate estimates. Everyone should go to realclearpolitics for the real numbers and bypass ABC and their spin. I’ve quit watching their news. I’m about ready to quit this site.
Posted by: wlw100 | April 24, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
hillary supporters will
make good chat room lawyers, they can justify anything, these are the same people clogging up traffic courts trying to beat a radar trap
Posted by: getreal | April 24, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
To wlw100:
Obama was on the ballot in MI. His proxies argued loudly on the public airwaves and in private that anyone who supported Obama should vote “uncommitted”. They were unrelenting. Consequently, voters understood going into the voting booth: voting “Clinton”=Clinton, voting “uncommitted”=Obama (or at least, “anyone but Clinton”).
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
if we cant uphold simple election rules why are we in the middle east trying to impose democracy , sanction and international rules and laws.. what a bunch of deceptive hypocrites.. reject that bareface lying hilary and her gang of decievers.. vote obama!!!
Posted by: bob | April 24, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
To getreal:
;-)
I could support either Hillary or Obama in a general election. But I am a small d “democrat” above all. I follow the arguments where they take me. I have yet to hear from an Obama partisan why the POPULAR vote in MI of FL (forget the delegates) should not be a factor that Super Delegates weigh when deciding who to nominate.
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
hey guys, just stop watching abc and tell a friend. i no longer watch
Posted by: truth | April 24, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
And another thing: who has Hillary been taking speech lessons from, GWB or John Kerry?
“I actually have more votes from people who actually voted for me”. As opposed to having more votes from people who DIDN’T vote for her? I’m confused.
Must be another late-night fatigue-induced misstatement, or maybe she is still dizzy from the corkscrew landing at the Tuzla Airport.
This is from the smartest woman in the world (except for Ann Coulter, of course).
Posted by: Nick in Virginia | April 24, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Do anything, Say anything, Act anyway to win right!!! My god Hillary what next.
Posted by: Tim, MPLS,MN | April 24, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
It says in the constitution that there shall be no relgious test for the president. So it is you delite820 who is not for america. And Obama is NOT A MUSLUM. Also northwest is a long way from chicago I know I’m in MT.
Posted by: Joe | April 24, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Hey, wait a minute. Why can’t you be accurate? It was NOT a double digit loss.
Posted by: Richard D.Albee | April 24, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
There were no legitimate primaries held in either Florida or Michigan. So why are these numbers bring added to Clinton’s totals? They are meaningless. This is getting more absurd and ridiculous by the day.
Posted by: Richard D.Albee | April 24, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
What is absurd is how Obama partisans make a fetish of his current “relative lead” among delegates.
There is nothing sacred about Obama’s relative lead in the delegate count. There would be, if it took him over the 2,025 delegate mark, but it has not.
In any event, his lead doesn’t reflect the “will of the people”, it only reflects the will of those voters whose votes are being counted.
Since he can’t get past the 2,025 delegate mark, then according to the rules, he has LOST the lock on a nomination just as soundly as Hillary has. They’ve BOTH lost.
This means it up to the Super Delegates to decide, weighing whatever factors they think are relevant.
In this case, I think the popular vote is actually more meaningful then Obama’s ARTIFICIAL lead. I also think to suggest otherwise is somehow unamerican.
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
To D. Finke:
but shouldn’t we write:
“between himself and his rival”
and not
“between him and his rival”?
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I have been waiting patiently for an Obama partisan to explain why the POPULAR VOTE (including the popular vote as reflected in the MI + FL voter turnouts) should not be among the DECISIVE factors the Super Delegates weigh in determining who should get the party nomination.
Nothing in the DNC rules says that the candidate with the relative lead in delegates wins. The rules say the canddidate with 2,025 delegates wins. So, all this talk of Obama’s relative lead in delegates is a red herring.
Forget the MI + FL DELEGATES, they have been rightly disqualified. Bringing them up again is a red herring.
I am saying that since neither candidate has locked up the nomination, the popular vote is at least as importnat as the relative delegate counts. Maybe the popular vote should even be decisive!
Please, someone convince me otherwise. I don’t think you have an argument.;-)
Posted by: JohnF | April 24, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Obama will be the Democrat’s presidential nominee for 2008.
Live with it.
Posted by: josephdjugashvili | April 24, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
9.28% is not a double digit. In fact it is closer to 9% than 10%.
Posted by: sam | April 24, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
NOT DOUBLE DIGITS!!!!
A little over 9% is what she won by which should be viewed as a huge loss of her previous margin. She sank like a tank!
Posted by: SuziQ | April 24, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Perfect commets ‘DaneNM’ and ‘New Jersey Dude’!
Why is everyone forgetting HRC was already in the White House (twice) and could not get her “Health Care” program started? What is she going to do this time (if she can even make it that far) bully the congress, cry, stamp her feet until she gets her way?
FL and MI thought they were better then the rest of the country and could defy the DNC party rules. They were fully aware of the consequences. What is wrong with the officals in FL that they feel thier state can continue to mess up the presidental elections? We would love to have the voters of these states be counted but the elected officals suddenly can’t locate the money for an honest re-election. If the voters of FL and MI want to throw thier anger at anyone they should point it towards their officals who made the arrogant decision to hold thier elections early. It was not Obama rules.
Go OBAMA! Change this country for the better and restore our dignity from a lying adulterous president(Clinton, who was impeeched and refused to leave office)and the other self serving president (Bush, who took our country into Iraq to finish the job his father could not by bringing down Sadam).
Posted by: wdw1971 | April 24, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
“We want Hill to raise our kids.”
OMG.
Now I suppose she is Saint Hillary. What selective memories….probably coupled with downright ignorance.
Posted by: SuziQ | April 24, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
What an elitist rersponse. He so carelessly tosses aside the votes in Florida as though they dont matter. Is that what he will do if elected president, toss aside the voices of Americans who do not side with him?
Posted by: roberincharlotte | April 24, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
The Florida votes don’t matter….the party leaders set these rules and Obama and Hillary both agreed to abide by the party decision…until Hillary realized she needed whatever votes she got. It’s too bad for Florid and Michigan voters but they have their party leaders to thank.
Obama is playing by the party rules. Now that it doesn’t serve her purpose Hillary is not playing by the rules. I’m so surprised!
Do you think for one moment that if she were in Obama’s position she wouldn’t be hollering that the rules were set by the party and that Obama is a (insert adjectives) for trying to violate them?
Posted by: SuziQ | April 24, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
SuziQ: You are laboring under a common misconception. The agreement signed by the candidates regarding Florida and Michigan stated only that the candidates would not campaign or participate in the primaries. The agreement said nothing about counting the votes or the delegates. It is the DNC which refuses to count the delegates; and it is Obama who has stood in the way of a revote so that the voters in those states could have their voices heard.
Posted by: James | April 24, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Seems to me Obama is just doing what the DNC decided should happen.
Are you saying that if Obama pressured the DNC that they’d count the votes – in a state that he had agreed not to campaign in, that Hillary had agreed to not campaign in but nonetheless declared victory? Obama wasn’t even on the ballot in Michigan.
Of course Hillary wants to count states where she managed to pull out more votes by hook or crook. I don’t blame Obama for letting the DNC call the shots on this.
I’m not even an Obama supporter…although I sort of was until I heard his pastor and Ayres and a few other things. But I just don’t see that he’s wrong on this.
Posted by: SuziQ | April 24, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Furthermore, I’m in the Northwest, where our voices are almost never heard in the primaries….because those are the rules. So I don’t have endless sympathy for Florida and Michigan on that point. I think those voters should complain to their party leaders.
Posted by: SuziQ | April 24, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
SuziQ: Well, then you and I can just agree to disagree. Some of us care whether the voters have a voice in this very important process; other’s don’t. Obama and his supporters seem to fit nicely with those Republican who attempted to disenfranchise voters in 2000 and 2004. Obama claims to have brought Republicans into his fold; maybe these are the supporters who have such little regard for Democracy.
Posted by: James | April 24, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Excellent post Independent! Obama has been very smart in understanding the flawed primary system and using it’s pecularities to his advantage. If he wins the nomination I believe that he may very well win the popular vote and lose the election because unlike the primaries the general election is winner take all. I like him though and I think he’d make an excellent VP candidate.
Posted by: AnyDemWill Do | April 24, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
James,
Part of the process of this democracy is that those of us in the Northwest usually have zero influence on who our candidate is because the party has determined that our primaries are so late that the winners have already been decided.
I never thought to whine about how it isn’t fair – our parties set it up this way and it’s what we got. As far as I’m concerned this is still a democracy….as JFK once said “life isn’t fair”.
Posted by: SuziQ | April 24, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Sarah,
Hillary says she’s a Christian – and she definitely isn’t shy about what she thinks is right and wrong and has no qualms about makes laws to enforce this.
And what makes you think she doesn’t mind Bill sleeping around? Are you saying she puts on an illusion of a marriage so she can get elected?
Posted by: SuziQ | April 24, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
I don’t mind if FL and MI aren’t counted as is but something needs to be done to include them. Don’t say 50/50 split as that would be redundant. A revote of some description is required.
Obama knocks down every suggestion as he may not like the results.
His protests are a bit hypocritical when he was happy to accept the coronation that awarded him a seat in the legislator; when he and his legal cronies had every other candidate struck off the ballot in Illinois at the 11th hour. perfectly timed so no onme could run against him.
So who do you think “win at all costs” suits more aptly. Then take a look at the “good fortune” that befell his campaign to get into the Senate.
Too many coincidences. You want so desperatley for him to be golden that refuse to acknowledge anything else.
I am not defending Hillary here I am simply refusing to accept Obama as a victim or a saint. He is a just a politican and he is nothing new when you look at all his facts.
Posted by: no2hypocrites | April 24, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
This is great keep it going until Denver. Many of my Democrat friends are jumping ship to John McCain. I love it!
McCain 08
Posted by: Rodney | April 24, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
How about we count the votes Bill Clinton got in his primaries to because that would be fair. Hillary is a joke andfor her to even suggest this is completely laughable.
Posted by: Aj | April 24, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
It turns out that Hillary Clinton
won the Pennsylvania primary by
only 9 percent!
What a surprise the MSM lied!
So since Clinton needed to win by
double digits in PA and since Obama
still leads in delegates by 140 and in the popular vote by 500,000 and in states won, she should withdraw now!
Game over, Go Home!
Posted by: reaganfan | April 24, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Statistics can say whatever you like.
People keep going on about how Obama closed this huge 20+ gap in PA.
It is all a matter of whose polls you choose. In March 2007 Quiinpac and Strategic vision polling had him 10 points down.
In the earliest polls from last year which are used to show a big gap they also included Gore, Edwards, Richardson etc – so a bigger spread. In Feb this year he was within 5 points in many polls. Since then all the other candidates dropped out and he has remained within 10-15 points.
So to say he achieved a 15 close is stretching the truth very broadly.
We can all make stats say what we want and this is what is happening to create accusations of racisim etc
News bylines love to say most white women vote Clinton – 50%. What about blcak women go for Obama 81% or that most white men vote Obama 49%? Whites go for Clinton 50-42% But Blacks favour Obama 83-15%.
People quote uneducated, less than 5% of voters don’t have a high school diploma. 19% finished high school. So what is the bar for educated? Does it necessitate a college degree? because the other 75% are some college, college and post grad and the candidates have a 3-9% split on these voters.
Blue Collar; Many would be surprised to know that in 5 income brackets under 100K the candidates have a 1-5% split and that constitutes 75% of the voters. in the top income bracket 1% advantage to Obama and between 100K-200k 11% to Obama yet this is only 20% of voters.
All I’m saying is look it up yourself these people need to make a story to print and by quoting lopsided figures they can make it sound whatever way they want. people just go around seeing it as irrefutable truth.
(all date quoted pre PA exit polls)
Posted by: RD | April 24, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Karela,
You are right. If the tables were turned Hillary would be throwing the kitchen sick at Obama if he tried to get the votes in MI and FL to count.
What is interesting is that Obama has, with some luck, outsmarted Hillary (aka The Smartest Woman in the World). He has run a steady campaign without a lot of internal drama and within budget. Very very smart – especially for a rookie.
Posted by: SuziQ | April 25, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Karela
The rules to the candidates were not to campaign and they didn’t except for Obama through a loophole. Clinton actually thanked, supported and endorsed the voters of FL and MI prior to their primaries. Obama dismissed our efforts.
Obama like Biden and Richardson encouraged people to vote “uncommitted” in case things changed with the DNC and they could do something with FL and MI votes. They wanted to keep it up their sleeve that people were interested in voting.
Many of us went out and voted hoping something could be resolved even if it was a revote. We want a say.
Do you believe if this was reversed Obama and his legal eagles wouldn’t be beating a path to your door and courts across the land.
In November I will not vote at all no matter who the candidate is. You can’t have it both ways DNC. You say you don’t want me then good I’ll stay home. The GOP won’t get me either 50% seated that is pathetic – all or nothing just like my vote.
You all think its about Clinton trying to change the rules, i don’t care who wins our primary I just want a real vote and let our state decide. My country the land of the free is allowing a political party to tell me I don’t count, I don’t deserve a voice.
What makes it worse is the candidate of hope and reconciliation makes impassioned speeches telling us what it is like to be a black person and not to be seen and treated as an outcast and how it is wrong and people should be ashamed. Then treats me and mine with that same disregard. Now I am not downplaying the significance of racisim I am saying no one wants to be treated 2nd class.
Posted by: I love livin' in Miami | April 25, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Here’s my last word:
I am a life-long Democrat – was thrilled to shake the hand of George McGovern as a young boy, voted for Carter in my first national election, voted for Dukakis, Clinton, Clinton, Gore, and Kerry. I am a party loyalist who would vote for Obama if I felt he was the legitimate nominee. But here’s the rub. As things stand, I don’t think he is. He used every trick in the book to prevent a second primary from being held in MI, a primary he thought would go against him. Unless both will of MI and FL voters is somehow relected in the final outcome. I will not vote for Obama in the general election. I am that angry at Obama’s manipulation of the party rules.
Posted by: JohnF | April 25, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
I am so angry, I am making more typos than usual, here’s the edit:
“Unless the will of MI & FL voters (millions of voters) is fairly reflected in the final nomination process, I will not vote for Obama in the general election.”
Posted by: JohnF | April 25, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
John F,
I’m not telling you Obama is noble…but he is smart.
As I said before, being from the northwest, where our primaries almost never affect who ends up as the nominee, I have a jaded view of your complaints. I’d just have to say – welcome to our world – and – toughen up! Obama is dong what anyone would i.e. playing to win. If you think politics is fair then you really need to look more closely. Hillary would mow you down in a second if she thought you were in your way.
Posted by: SuziQ | April 25, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
how can people support hillary when she openly LIES about bosnia, tales of woman etc. looks like blind/herd mentality prevails in this free world.
Posted by: max | April 25, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
nor Obama nor Hillary Clinton will reach the 2025 delegates needed to win, there is no rule that says that the candidate with more delegates wins the nomination unless they reach 2025. It is not a math dilemma it is a dilemma about who can win the general election. Obama is unelectable. Senator Clinton can defeat McCain.
Posted by: Felixdiaz1 | April 25, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am
The Peter Paul lawsuit is against Bill Clinton not Hillary he tried to include her and others and the courts in California wouldn’t allow him to as he was just being vexatious there was nothing to warrant their inclusion.
The case may still not even make it to court as he is struggling to find people to fund it. Judical watch tossed him aside.
JW I am with you, ignore the ignorant “toughen up” spiel. It is an easy criticisim for someone to make when they got to vote, irrespective of the leanings of their state. As a Floridian and a Democrat we have had only 3 results for the Dems in the elections since 1960 so I know what it is to be up against it. They want to win at all costs including exclusion of the democratic rights of their countrymen.
If they were true Democrats they would be outraged at how the GOP destroyed our primary and insist it be fixed. The DNC let the GOP rort us and they care about apossible blood bath at the convention but not about nearly 3 million people who have been ignored and whose inclusion could either stop a bloodbath or justify the contest.
“In August, 2007 Florida’s Republican-controlled legislature set the date for the primary. The change was attached as an amendment to a popular bill requiring all electronic voting equipment to include paper receipts.”
Howard Dean and co. needed to tell the GOP to stay out of our primary but they caved.
It also amazes me how supporters condemn one candidate whilst justifying the bad behaviour of another. The term rose coloured glasses spring to mind.
Posted by: I love livin' in Miami | April 25, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am
How can people support Obama? he lies about being a civil rights lawyer (he only worked one case), He lies about not listening to the “snippets of hate” form Rev Wright, he lies about how much money he received from Rezko, he lied about when and where his PARENTS met, he accused his dead grandmother of typical white racist, he looks down on small town people clling them bitter just because they “don’t” get him, he is affraid to debate. He is unelectable.
Posted by: Felixdiaz1 | April 25, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
I feel sorry for your country. Like Louis rightly said you will deserve the president you get.
Posted by: levelheaded | April 25, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am
How can Obama be the President? He does not even want to count our vote. The votes from FL and MI are from real people. Does Obama look down on us the way he does on “small town people”? He talks about how African Americans did not have the right to vote, and justified Wright’s hate sermons. But he does not want to count our people, the vote by real people! Obama is full of self contradiction. We cannot trust him.
Posted by: JJ | April 25, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am
pastor wright is a marine unlike that draft dodger bill clinton. only a complete moron would confuse someone who preaches against injustice and racism with a racist
Posted by: thetruthhurts | April 25, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
Fine Mr. Obama, that’s a great message to send to the people of Michigan and Florida, you don’t need them. Well, what about during the general election? Do you think you can waltz into those states and then try to sell them after you get nominated? You are more stupid than I even realized, to think you can dis the very people you are going to need to get elected. These two states have alot of electoral votes during the GE and you just want to throw them away, GOOD THINKING! This is just an example of how flawed and inexperienced your thinking is on political strategy.
Posted by: Tim | April 25, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am
what a bunch of cry babies, get a life!!! florida and mahicigan will get to vote again in the general u can take you whining to polls then
Posted by: whaooooooblahhhh | April 25, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
I am not surprised by the assertion that HRC is in the lead in popular votes. It is yet another symptom of a disease since diagnosed as the “bosnia fantasy”. I am all for a revote in Florida and Michigan, but HRC’s insistence on counting the exisiting results does not make sense, and only indicates a heightened sense of desperation. I personally know at least five persons in Michigan who wanted to vote for Obama but could not as his name was not there! Doesn’t counting the results of the “primary” amount to disenfranching these voters? As for Florida, yes neither HRC nor Obama campaigned. But does it make it a level playing field? The whole idea of the primary process is to allow candidates to introduce themselves to the voters throgh campaigning. HRC was a household name and needed no introduction. But circa the primary time, how many voters were asking: Obama who?
Posted by: saif1028 | April 25, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Senator Clinton is in a state of denial or she is playing to the ignorance of people. Senator Obama’s name was not even on the ballot in Michigan. Her statements would have you believe that these two state Florida and Michigan votes have already counted. She seems desperate.
Posted by: Ira Malik | April 25, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Michigan and Florida shouldnt be seated bc they broke the rules and rules are rules. Hillary ur just too desperate and niveve to realize u wont win the nomination in August. So please do all of us a favor and get out while u still can.
P.S Obama is going to win both in North Carolina and Indiana!!! OBAMA’08
Posted by: Matt | April 25, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Michigan and Florida shouldnt be seated bc they broke the rules and rules are rules. Hillary ur just too desperate and niveve to realize u wont win the nomination in August. So please do all of us a favor and get out while u still can.
P.S Obama is going to win both in North Carolina and Indiana!!! OBAMA’08
Posted by: Matt | April 25, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Hillary only won by 9% in PA thats only a single digit lead. so she didnt get what she wanted. END THIS DRAMA, VOTE FOR OBAMA!!
Posted by: matt | April 25, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Obama 2008=Bush 2000!
I hold Obama personally responsible for the mess we now have with MI & FL delegates.
To be sure, Michigan party leaders screwed up the first time by moving the primaries up and thereby breaking party rules. But the outcome from this flawed first primary could have been easily solved. Hold a SECOND PRIMARY!
Hillary was willing, Obama said NO WAY.
He said no because he thought he would lose.
OBAMA 2008=BUSH 2000!
Posted by: JW | April 25, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
To Dan:
What’s your point? The first primary was flawed, even Hillary acknowledged that.
The problem could have been solved by holding a second primary; Hillary said she willing, Obama blocked it.
Under these circumstances, Hillary is left to insist that the delegates from the first primary should somehow be recognized, but Obama put her in that position by refusing to hold a second primary.
Obama is the villain at this stage.
Posted by: JW | April 25, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Incidentally, Obama also made a “solemn promise” not to run advertisements in the Florida primary. But then he circumvented this “Sacred Oath” by taking out new ads on national television (which he knew would be running in the Florida market).
C’mon Obama partisans, quit trying to make Hillary out to be the villain in this race.
Obama blocked a second primary from being held in Michigan. This second primary would have settled the issue of Michigan delegates, and have elected a new slate of delegates to sit in the national convention. Obama said screw Michigan voters because he thought he would lose.
Posted by: JW | April 25, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
hilary not obama was a republican until she met bill
Posted by: james | April 25, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Obama is not a Republican – I am sure he is a died-in-the-wool liberal Democrat. We know this based on his limited voting record in the Senate – by some accounts the most liberal.
But then why are partisan Republicans donating hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaign? Why did Karl Rove encourage Republicans to vote for Obama? Are the Repulicans so demoralized?
Obama himself has openly run a campaign inviting Republicans to cross-over, “vote Democrat for a day” in open primaries in order to help him defeat Hillary.
Obama is a smart man, I do not think he really believes these Republicans will vote for him in the GE.
In a word, he is playing a very dangerous game: Use Republicans to defeat Hillary in the primary, but then hope enough of her supporters will vote for him in the GE to make up for the inevitable loss of Republican support.
Posted by: JW | April 25, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
To SuzieQ and all the rest of you totalitarians who would throw MI & FL voters out of the process.
As a Michigan Dem, I am not asking for anyone’s sympathy. I think we are tough enough. ;-)
Forgive me, but I think you are confused when you compare the situation of NW states to the current situation of MI and FL votesr.
The votes of NW states don’t count, because the nomination is usually sewed up before these states have a chance to vote.
The votes of MI and FL are being thrown out by Obama, because the nomination HAS NOT BEEN DECIDED, and allowing a REVOTE in MI or seating the FL delegates could easily reverse his lead.
That is a pretty big difference!
CONCLUSION: by blocking a REVOTE in MI and by refusing to allow FL delegates to be seated (he was on the ballot in FL), Obama and Obama alone is responsible for the durrent crisis.
In effect, he is trying to steal the Democratic nomination.
He isn’t a clever strategist, so much as he is a shameless thief.
Posted by: JohnF | April 25, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
OMG, too many people here display either a complete lack of reasoning skills or are so biased for their candidate that they’ve lost objectivity.
Obama is not disrespecting MI and FL voter–that’s the Clinton campaign’s cynical and damaging ploy.
Obama has strategized and competed according to the rules that all candidates agreed to, including Clinton.
She did not care about FL and MI votes until she started losing.
How on earth can anybody justify giving her 328,039 MI votes to ZERO votes for Obama? That’s laughable!
His name was not on the ballot. Even banana republics don’t hold elections like that and consider it valid.
As for saying it was his fault for removing his name–no, most candidates did, and the Clinton campaign claimed “logistical problems” and a lost letter were reasons her name was still on the ballot. And, that the vote was not going to count for anything.
Please!
Posted by: JustConsider | April 25, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
To JustConsider:
Once again, an Obama partisan misses the point. Who is it that is “display [ing] either a complete lack of reasoning skills or are so biased for their candidate that they’ve lost objectivity.”
Obama screwed MI voters by denying us a chance at a revote, not by refusing to seat delegates from the first, flawed primary. Of course the delegate count in the first primary is flawed. That is obvious to any sane person, and is certainly obvious to MI democrats.
MI democrats are not upset because these delegates aren’t being seated. We are upset because Obama (not Hillary) refused to hold a second primary.
So, quit bringing up this red herring of the first primary. IT IS NOT THE POINT. The point is Obama’s refusal to allow a REVOTE!
Hillary is forced to argue the initial delegate count be recognized. This is her only, third-best option.
But that is Obama’s fault. Hillary was willing to let the chips fall where they may – hold a revote and let the best candidate win. Obama, on the other hand, wanted to lock in his lead by shutting out MI altogether.
Posted by: JWF | April 25, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
I dispute your point. Complain about Florida and Michigan if you want to. Fla and Michigan failed to follow the rules. Even the Democratic Party sees that. Get over it.
Posted by: dan kolich | April 25, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
to JW:
It’s easy to say it was blocked by OBama but unless you were involved directly in the meetings you have no idea what the details of the meetings were or what concessions were demanded by these groups. I don’t think you were personally involved in the meetings. Why continue to echo the press on its sound bites? For some reason the leadership of the Democratic Party has sided with Obama. There’s probably more under the covers than you know.
Posted by: dk | April 25, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
How can that witch hillary try to say she is ahead in the popular vote count she goes by numbers that give obama 0 votes in Michigan and doesn’t even count the caucus states in the total. Thats funny what hillary you think no one wants obana to be pres in Michigan Never mind that the results in Michigan and Florida would not be the same if the vote there was for nothing there probably was a lot who didn’t vote cause they knew it wouldn’t count. How can you know that the majority of those didn’t support Obama and she won Pennslyvania by 9.37% not 10% so stop lying in the media and saying it was by 10%. Its funny that you ABC have hillary on top with her bogus vote count where she claims she is ahead on your site by the canidate and delegate totals. To bad that she is going to be behind y 130-140 pledged delegates in the best case for hillary at the end of the primaries that means she will need like 2/3 or more of remaining supers to support her so good luck with that
Posted by: Jason | April 26, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Dan…………… you are wrong the Democratic party in Florida and the Democratic voters in Florida DID NOT violate the rules it was the Republican legislator, look it up. The DNC know this too they just didn’t want to bend to the GOP and in the process have screwed their own primary. – Try facts not news bites.
True Democrats should be angry that people were denied their right to vote the basis of the party being equal for all and recognising all. Instead all people seem to care about is if it helps or hinders their candidate.
You want to dismiss us, you want to say we broke rules, you want to sya get over it – FINE.
Friendly reminder. We are 2 of the biggest swing states and in 2004 the margins were FL: Bush +400,000 and MI: Kerry + 160,000.
Voters who weren’t annoyed with their party or other voters who told us we should “get over it”. It will come back and bite you on the butt. 1 in 15 MI voters will easily stay home or vote elsewhere. AS for Fl: 1 in 9.
Go ahead laugh at us and ignore us.
Posted by: RD | April 26, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
@dk:
Naaah…
Obama deep-sixed a second primary in Michigan to advance his own short-term political agenda.
True, I am forced to rely on the media for my information. But its not like knowing this is some state secret.
Hillary vocally supported a second primary, Obama (and his proxies) expressed “reservations”: was it O.K. to finance a public election with privae funds, shouldn’t all Michiganders (Repulican crossover voters, and Democrats equally) have the right to vote, the second primary shoujld be held as a caucus, not a primary (a primary is traditional MI, and by holding a caucus, Obama would have effectively shut out working-class Democrats, who can’t devote 8 hours to the caucus process).
The state legistlature said that if the parties couldn’t agree, they wouldn’t decide for them. It was in all the papers: local, and the national media.
On the other hand, maybe I should be second-guessing myself, as you suggest.
At the end of the day, I really only know anything about the current political mess based on media reports. Actually, I only know that we’re even holding a primary based on media reports; I only know that Clinton and Obama are running for President based on media reports; I only know that President Bush is the current President based on media reports; I only know that we have occupied Iraq based on media reports (and personal conversations with returned vets, but they could be lieing;-)
Naaah…
Obama deep-sixed a second primary in Michigan to advance his own short-term political agenda.
Posted by: JWF | April 26, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Jason
In 2004 700,000 voted in the Florida primary. In 2008 857,000 voted for Clinton alone.
In 2004 150,000 voted in the Michigan primary. In 2008 250,000 voted uncommitted.
You don’t think people felt strongly and wanted to send a message to be heard ??
Posted by: RD | April 26, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
Hillary Clinton CAN SAY that she is ahead in the polls because Florida and Michigan overwhelmingly voted for her and therefore she has the OVERALL MAJORITY vote. You CANNOT leave these 2 states OUT. They are just as much part of the USA and the process as are any other state!!! What kind of a “democratic proccess” is it to leave millions of voters out – when they have gone to the polls and voted for their candidate, with a huge majority for Hillary Clinton. Barak Hussein Obama was in the race, but he decided to pull out in Michigan. He could have stayed in, but he chose to drop out. It was his own choice and should not blame anyone else.
To recap: Counting Florida and Michigan voters AS WE SHOULD, it is very clear that Hillary Clinton is in the lead. The super delegates MUST take this into consideration when chosing their candidate because these same people will go to vote in the fall. If they ignore it, well the Democrats will lose the elections.
Posted by: Retrovvision | April 26, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am
I don’t want to hand an election to either candidate. I believe the constitution means the rights of all Americans to have a say in the Democratic process.
I don’t just appreciate the will of the people, I believe in it. I don’t want it settled by Superdelegates under these circumstances.
I would accept them settling it if the all states had voted and been counted and it was neck in neck. Not like this with half measures, innuendo and accusations hanging over the nominee.
I understand when it is tight nominees need to weigh up things like key states etc.
For example in the 2004 Presidential election, 11 states accounted for over 50% of all EC votes. Now Obama has/will win 3 of these by the time the primary is over, Clinton 8 of these.
Currents poll match ups show Obama taking 4 of these in November and Clinton 6 maybe even 8, two are too close to call.
Now I am not touting for Clinton and saying because of this she should get the nod. I am just saying many factors can play into who or why a superdelegate comes into play and they choose who they do. I also know polls vary and alot can change between now and November for all candidates.
I am just staying open to everything and keeping my eye on the prize and knowing the Presidency is bigger the emotion going around right now. Emotion is good but it is head and heart they can’t decide exclusive of each other.
Posted by: ponder | April 26, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am
Cool down everybody! Either you hate Obama or you hate HRC. I support him, but I don’t hate her. I want her to fight on till the last day of the primaries. If she loses the nomination fight, she should support the nominee. If she does not, you will have heard the Clinton name for the last time in the Democratic politics. Even if Obama loses,the country and the Democratic Party would come out of it a lot stronger. It is worth taking that risk.
Posted by: saif1028 | April 26, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
saif1028, Unfortunately, I believe you are wrong. The Clintons are driving a wedge into the Democratic party that will be irreparable. Not only that they are driving away Independent voters. So, while I am sure if she loses she will make up with Obama she cannot put the genie back in the bottle. This division will not go away easily..
Posted by: indy_voter | April 26, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
In October Clinton said about the race in Michigan-”it is clear that it isn’t going to count for anything.” Guess how many votes Obama got out of Michigan? Zero. When Clinton uses Michigan in her poplular vote total, she is assuming that zero people would of voted for Obama. Also, she doesn’t include several caucus states that don’t report popular vote that Obama won. There is a reason why they decided the nomination process was going to be decided by pledged delegates and Clinton didn’t have a prolem with it until it was shown she couldn’t win that way. Now she wants to change the rules. If she steals this from Obama, she loses the election. But I think her point is to hurt Obama so he loses and she runs again in 2012-although she doesn’t seem to realise that she would lose if she did this.
Posted by: Dee | April 26, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
If the remaining democratic primary is about the issues it should continue however, it’s no longer about the issues its about selling newspapers, ratings, and Hillary hell bent on blooding Obama, hoping he’s unelectable so she can get on her high horse and say to the democratic party. I told u so. It’s mathematically over for Hillary and if the super delegates overturn the people’s choice there will be a revolt, its time for the super delegates to step in and stop this carnage, if Hillary was not a Clinton, they would have. Quit clinging to the thrown, we live in a democracy not a monarchy
Posted by: reality | April 26, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
here here jabate.. some americans are so darn gulliable.. they reward those that lie and dont play by the rules and attack those that do.. no wonder our kids are lacking in morals
Posted by: tony | April 26, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
all this talk about obama being unelectable, good luck to hillary winning the presidency with 7% of the black vote, without the 10 thousand of new registered voters for obama, and without those who think she’s a pathological liar who’s not fit to lead
Posted by: linda | April 26, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
OPEN CHALLENGE TO OBAMA PARTISANS:
You insist Obama’s delegate lead and THE RULES dictate he is automatically the winner.
I don’t think his delegate lead = a win.
At best, his lead = what in chess is called a DRAW, i.e. according to the rules, neither player (Hillary or Obama) can possibly give checkmate by a series of LEGAL moves. The game is over, but NEITHER side won.
OPEN CHALLENGE TO OBAMA PARTISANS!
If I am right, and THE CONTEST IS A DRAW, then it really IS up to the Super Delegates to decide whom to nominate – relying on any information they think is relevant (popular vote, relative weight of delegates earned in caucuses compared to delegates earned in primaries, relative weight of big state wins compared to small state wins, apparent preferences of FL & MI voters, etc, etc).
Convince me otherwise, convince me the current contest is not a draw, and I will happily stop arguing Clinton has as much right to be considered for the nomination as Obama.
I’ll throw in the towel!
OPEN CHALLENGE TO OBAMA PARTISANS!
Posted by: JWF | April 26, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
jwf. the real question is if abama was allowed to campaign in florida and michigan would he still be ahead in the popular votes and delegates. the answer is.. yes he would!! even with hilary’s 20 years of free press, and her husband’s legacy , obama would have campaigned, people would have gotten to know him and he would have been further ahead in popular votes and delegates
Posted by: sigh | April 26, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
sigh: absolute rubbish.
Florida is all for Hillary – Obama (not abama as you have written it) was on the ballot too, but people voted overwhelmingly for Senator Cinton.
As for Michigan, Barak chose to pull out. He didn’t have to do that… but he decided to take himself out because he felt he was losing there too, and decided to concentrate his efforts somewhere else he was sure to win. It was his own choice. Now he is saying Michigan primaries were not fair, because he was not running! Give me a break!
Posted by: Retrovvision | April 27, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
Wake up Clinton fans counting votes ha ha ha stop and think Obama has won 13 caucaus states each delegate rep a number of votes in a given area so turn the delegates from caucaus states into
people votes and Obama leads Clinton
by about 2 million votes and sory but that’s the way super delegates will look at it SORY JUST SOME PLANE FACTS
OH BY THE WAY IM FROM FL AND WE DID
GO TO THE POLLS FOR TAX PURPOSE’S AND
IT MENT ABOUT $400.00 PER HOUSEHOLD IN THE HOMESTEAD ACT HE HE NOW WHY DID WE VOTE
Posted by: Randel | April 27, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
I think the majority of people here, including the press, have over looked one thing, “the American Voters”. All votes that have been validated by each state; count towards the Total Count. It is an amendment to our constitutional right for each vote from voters to count. That being said; it is correct that both parties, have the super delegates ax, which can overthrow that constitutional right of each vote to be counted. You can not take away the peoples vote. period. Take my word, the DNC rules will get overturned, and correctly so. It was not the voter who wished the primaries in Florida and Michigan to go forward, but the state representatives. It is ashame that we as voters give up our alienated rights for a “feel good moment”. Let it be our right for privacy, or freedom, or land ownership for the sake of safety. Have we forgotten all the vets who gave us that right. The most important aspect, how can one WANT to put into office, the highest office of our land, one who can’t and won’t wear the American Flag, or GIVE a simple gesture of placing A hand over THEIR heart during OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM is and would be a disgrace to all AMERICAN VOTERS. Ric
Posted by: Ric | April 29, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am
ric, i hope u were as equally upset when the clintons committed purjury and acts of adultery in the highest office of the land
Posted by: jim | April 29, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Jim, I understand what you are saying, and as the World looks upon us…, well; for that matter, Sex in Europe, is not looked at the same as it is here in the USA. That being said; extra marital affairs have been in our politics for centuries, and a passing mention we had a Gay President. As Christians, we hold that no one is perfect, and can’t hold anyone to live, or be expected to live a perfect life. We all strive for that, and should; But to say moral or “family values”, which is a private matter, which effects only their inner circle, is equal to not showing respect for millions of people living today, and our forefathers; our service members who fought in past and current battles/ wars, that give us our freedoms that we have today. He could be the next POTUS. The American Flag, IS the symbol of OUR freedom, and as the LEADER OF OUR COUNTRY, not to show that respect (small gesture, that it may be; but SHOWS a huge amount of respect to all past and present citizens of THE USA,
For all those who want to enter our country, and gain legal citizenship; they have to Pledge allegiance to our Flag, government. Why should we except less from Senator Obama.
So the bottom line would be;, if by what President Clinton did, offended you, and many others, then why in the world would you or others want to put into office, someone who willingly, or willfully denies showing or giving RESPECT to our COUNTRY, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. No matter his personal creed, religion, or beliefs, he still lives, works, and resides in Government office, of OUR (CITIZENS)the USA.
Posted by: Ric | April 29, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm