Obama: ‘Hope and Anger’ Go Hand in Hand
ABC News’ Eloise Harper and Sunlen Miller report: Barack Obama made a new argument in trying to quell the fire that his remarks over "bitter" Pennsylvania voters have drawn: that hope and anger go hand and hand.
Obama, who has run most of his candidacy under the message of hope, interwove that message with the message that has dusted up the controversy: that people are frustrated and have anger and bitterness because they feel the government is not listening to them.
"Sometimes hope and anger go hand and hand," he said today at the Philadelphia City Committee’s Jefferson-Jackson dinner. "People really are angry, they really are fed up, some of them are bitter because Washington’s forgotten them. And because it’s not me that’s out of touch, it’s folks who think that folks are happy when they are out of a job and they have lost their pension and they don’t have health care and their schools are under-funded."
In the comments at a San Francisco fundraiser that spurred the controversy, Obama also said that people "cling" to religion when they are bitter.
Today in Philadelphia he indicated that he is one of those people who turn to religion in hard times.
"And I go to church, just like you go to church," he said. "And sometimes we pray, ‘Lord, I hope that things will get better.’ There are a whole lot of people that are doing that now."
Obama spoke to a rowdy crowd for 25 minutes – there was a roar of ambient discussion going on while the Senator spoke but most people paid attention and some stood on chairs to see the Senator speak. By comparison, Senator Clinton, who spoke to the same group before Senator Obama, delivered her shortest campaign speech yet, speaking for less than 5 minutes.
Clinton delivered a super-speed version of her stump speech, hitting the topics of Iraq, college affordability, and health care in quick succinct successive form. Clinton spoke loudly to the crowd, as the audience members spoke over her. Campaign staffers explained that Clinton was warned by Mayor Nutter and Gov. Rendell to keep it short because the crowd was standing and drinking — and it was not the time for the long speech.
The candidates did not meet backstage or on stage at the event. On Wednesday they will meet when they go head-to-head at the ABC News/Facebook debate in Philadelphia.
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
I need clarification. Am I bitter, clinging, angry, or hopeful? Maybe Obama can tell me since he knows best and he can tell what we are all thinking. Thank you saint obama.
Posted by: al | April 14, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I am bitter. I have checked out the facts.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/select.asp?cycle=2008
My vote is with Senator Obama.
Posted by: Deward Bowles | April 14, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
I think obama has been bamboozling us. He sounds like a cross between malcolm x and rev wright. not good.
Posted by: al | April 14, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Amazing how many different”excuses’ can one manhave to explain his words? Once words are uttered,without the speechmakers by your side and your tele-prompter in your face.. it’s tough to repair thecruel damage you have caused.
It amazes me to see the support he gets for having a racist pastor-mentor; a ffriend who is close to jail time and a pprofessor buddy who claims he “did not do enough” after bombing buildings in NY. These Obama followers are “under a very frightening spell”.
Posted by: DaneNM | April 14, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
The Jefferson Jackson dinner is for the most part an AA dinner and Hillary has attened everyone but Obama is usally to busy for the AA affairs He did not attend ours nor the black state of the union and on the anniversary of MLK deathhe wasn’t there I wonder why .
Posted by: Bishop | April 14, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
I am bitter. I have watched NAFTA devastate my state [OH]. I have watched the Clinton’s devolved to Rove-light. I’ve watch Hillary attempt to play the black vote against the Lationo vote.
I am also hopeful. Hopeful that the superdelegates will not be so elitist as to reverse the will of the voters. I am hopeful that Hillary will at some point decision to leave the field with some little shred of her dignity remaining.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
He’s right, that’s the funny thing.
A lot of people out here ARE bitter.
Wake up folks.
Posted by: mg | April 14, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Obama, to wealthy san fran donors, when he thought he was off the record:
“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years. … And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Posted by: al | April 14, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Look at it this way, isn’t a poorly worded truth better than a well worded lie??
Tell me, we’re not all a little bitter over the politics of the last eight years. I personally tend to vote more on the issues that are important to me than the real person who represents these issues because they are all politicians.
Hillary’s just better at being one than Obama – is that necessarily a good thing??
Posted by: Dani girl | April 14, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
The Clintons are so desperate that they will stoop to nothing in lying and deceiving the voters. Hillary tells lies causally. Her husband is no different. If that is not elitist, what is? He tells 7 lies in a 15 word statement, about Hillary’s Bosnia’s trip. What do they think of the voters? Do they think the voters are fool when without thinking they underestimate the intelligence of the hardworking voters in small town America? Are they so out of touch with the conditions of the small man that they think that small town America does not feel? Bill Clinton himself recently stated that the U.S. is in a deplorable state because of high gas, war in Iraq, foreclosure, and recession. Hillary says she needs to clean up. My question is, why does Hillary needs to clean up after Bush if people are not frustrated, bitter and angry? Being bitter, angry and frustrated does not mean they are not optimistic. Small Town Americans are proud. They are optimistic. And yes they are bitter, frustrated but optimistic. One is not exclusive of the other. People are human. They feel. They suffer when they cannot feed their kids, pay their bills, keep their homes, and have a job. They are bitter, frustrated and angry when their pregnant sister dies because she has no insurance. They are bitter, frustrated and angry when presidential campaigns owe them money after they have performed a service. They are bitter, frustrated and angry when political candidates patronize them with lies about Bosnian snipers. They are bitter angry and frustrated when their child in Iraq dies, a victim of a faceless enemies.
Yes, they are bitter angry and frustrated. They have all rights to their humanity. But instead of killing, fighting or doing crime, these hard working people cling to something they are familiar with. They cling to something that will never let them down; their traditions and hometown culture. Like people every where when you are in pain you cling to something. It can be negative things like drugs and crime or it can be positive things like family, religion, faith, church, hunting, and sports. I reiterate it’s optimism and pride that make small town people cling to their hunting instead of killing. It’s optimism pride and faith that makes them cling to their religion instead of delusion. But yes they are bitter, angry and frustrated; let’s not steal their feeling, from them. Clintons get out of your, 109 million bubble and get in touch, get real. As for you McCain, you get angry; bitter and frustrated and negatively attack colleagues and family. Small Town America choose the positive alternative faith, hunting and HOPE.
Posted by: pat S austin | April 14, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
He said people cling to their religion and guns as REACTIONS. He called working class people reactionaries. He does not recognize that religion and hunting are part of a way of life and not a REACTION.
Try to understand that. I know it is difficult, because obama spins. But the quote is not in question.
Posted by: al | April 14, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Read the entire transcript of what Obama said in SF and then make your decision. If you don’t, then you’re letting the Hillary Clinton and John McCain make your decision for you.
IN CONTEXT, Obama was explaining why small town voters often vote against their own economic interests. It’s because they feel it won’t make a difference because the politicians don’t do anything. Instead they vote on other issues they care about.
In no way, shape or form did Obama say that people become religious or militant or racist or bigoted because they are bitter. Read for yourself. Google is your friend.
Posted by: JCinDE | April 14, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Do the Clinton supporter REALLY want the folks around them scrutinized on an equal level. How about her convicted Whitewater friends? What about her impeached husband? Her advisors who score big money from foreign governments? How about her husband who all but sold this country to China and then advised Dubia on the ports deal? The Clinton camp seems to be a few altar calls away from the koolaid finally.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
JCinDe folks don’t want facts. They want talking points. Please stop cluttering the field with facts and relevant information.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
I am convinced the U.S. is full of racist bigots! This is a non-story being played up by the media for the Clintons and Republicans, which aren’t that unlike each other these days. What a bunch of elitist scumbags! THe old guard can’t stand the fact the newer generation is coming into power. It stings them that a Black candidate is on the verge of being the next President of the United States.
Posted by: Susan | April 14, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Obama’s comments were disparaging.
Posted by: br | April 14, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
You folks are funny. Obama will get the nomination. The illusion that the race is even close is a figment of the Clinton co-Presidency imagination.
Do the math:
http://www.slate.com/id/2185278/
Hillary needs to win every remaining primary by 65% just to pull even. She can only pull ahead in the delegate math if somehow Florida and Michigan get thrown in with 65% wins for her as well. Wake up Hillary, it’s over.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Keith: Sorry I can’t help myself.
Context is not a new or alien concept. People should know better than to listen to two sentences parsed out of five paragraphs of discussion and think they can make informed judgments about it.
The context of his remarks are posted on his site. DON’T BE IGNORANT. GO READ IT.
http://factcheck.barackobama.com/factcheck/2008/04/11/transcript_of_obamas_remarks_a.php
Posted by: JCinDE | April 14, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Cracker it’s nice to see you have such a high opinion of your fellow Americans and the quality of their work. Wow, are you sure you’re not bitter, lmao.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
As I observe this campaign over the last year. It’s getting clearer that Obama has a set of weaknesses that will not ultimately be admired in a president. First, he is indecisive. He would say he is thoughtful and that’s good, but I wonder if he has a fear of failure. He tends to be flip and over confident when a little humility would be authentic. Finally, he overestimates his abilities and experience. Americans don’t appreciate boasting when it’s not earned.
Posted by: raf | April 14, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Obama, to wealthy san fran donors, when he thought he was off the record:
“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years. … And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Posted by: al | April 14, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
al,
The raciest MF, Get the F outta here!!
Posted by: CC | April 14, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
For those who wonder why he was discussing this at all, there’s even more homework for you.
A first hand account from one of the “San Francisco elitists” who were in attendance. It explains why the subject came up and provides even more context to illuminate what Obama was really talking about.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-coleman/i-was-there-what-obama-re_b_96553.html
Posted by: JCinDE | April 14, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
JCinDe. There you go again with them pesky facts. raf are you high? We have now a president who sat on his butt blinking like a deer in headlights when he was told about the 9/11 attacks. A president who joined the Air Guard in Texas to avoid going to Vietnam and now sends the National Guard to fight a foreign war. A vice president who flat out responded “so” when challenged that most Americans do not support the Iraq war. I wonder if the current administration has a fear of facts.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
I am Bitter about Economy and War!!
I support OBAMA!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 14, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
@al: out of fairness you should include the “…” you left out. some may consider that useful context.
@raf: he is imperfect. i think his stumbling “uhhs” are because he is overthinking and because at time he is underinformed. on the other hand, after Bush, it seems that many Americans will overlook these types of things.
Posted by: MIguy | April 14, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Well folks its 11:30 pm here. I find myself asking which candidate best represents my next life choice. I choose Hillary, it’s time for a shot and a beer. brb.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Obama is the unvetted candidate with a lot of surprises. He would be a terrible president, black, white, or orange. He would be known as the king of equivocation. can you say carter or dukakis? when will the dems wake up?
Posted by: al | April 14, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Sno-bama. Snob and snow job. And if you point that out, you are a racist! Nice! I have never felt such unity! Thanks, Obama! Snobama, whatever.
Posted by: al | April 14, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Crack Head,
You mean Hillary is going back to NY!!
Well she fought well. May be next time!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 14, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Malcolm O is bitter because small-town Americans cling to God and guns, instead of his empty feel good slogans.
Posted by: USmarine0331 | April 14, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Losers? What polls you watchin’? 1st across the board among dem’s and McCain not exactly hard for him to beat. McCain needs Hillary to rally his conservative who still aint real warm and fuzzy with him yet.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Which explanation is Obama on now? Six or seven explaining what he explained what he meant that none of us was supposed to hear in the first place.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 14, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
This is working out great. We should see that Pennsylvania voters move towards Obama, with continued tightening of the race. Obama is taking a potential negative and turning it once again into a huge positive. Rural voters in PN are candidly seeing how small Hillary is in her over-cooked responses and attacks. Hillary drinking whiskey with voters is political suicide. Did you see the picture of Hillary looking cross-eyed at her shot glass full of whiskey? She’s probably never done something so silly and unpresidential. I’m reminded of the Dukakis photos that made him look like a bush-league panderer for votes. Small town folks in PN, Indiana, and NC are frustrated and bitter with their economic futures under the last several decades of poor presidential leadership, both democratic and republican. Jeff Toobin at CNN has it right- Hillary has embarassed herself, with her desperate attempts to attack Obama over his recent insightful comments. Keep rolling Obama!
Posted by: rco | April 14, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
al,
Dems already woke up and Voted a large number for OBAMA, only you were sleeping!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 14, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Preach on RCO preach on
Si se puede :)
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Preach on RCO preach on
Si se puede :)
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
I’m sure that Al Gore appreciate being thrown under the bus by Hillary, when she said that he lost the 2000 election because voters thought he was elitist. Obama had it right when he responded that actually, he felt Al Gore won the 2000 election. Can’t wait to see who Gore endorses! Have another drink HIllary- relax!
Posted by: rco | April 14, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
rco – Toobin, a lawyer, hired by CNN to explain matters of law never worked politics until this year. Toobin is the same guy who couldn’t even get the OJ Simpson story straight.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 14, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
So is Obama suggesting that hopeful people are also angry people?
Posted by: psychiatrist | April 14, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
YES we can improve our economy!
Yes we can end the war and win the war at the same time!
Yes we can bring the whole country together to get things done in D.C.
Yes we can stop taking money from lobbyists and help the American middle class!!
It only takes a great leader with vision to go forward!!
With OBAMA! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 14, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
rco – Obama – “It’s time to set a hard date to signal a new mission in Iraq and to begin to bring our troops home. It’s time to ensure that we complete the change in mission and the drawdown of our forces, by the end of April 2008 – a date that is consistent with the date in my plan back in January.”
Obama last week: United States should transition to an “over-watch” force of between 60,000 and 80,000 troops by the end of 2010, according to an article Friday in the New York Sun.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 14, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Can you say Dukakis Obama Kerry Kennedy Gore Dodd I think hear the fat lady warming up in the mountains of PA.
go Hillary 08
Posted by: Bishop | April 14, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
go Hillary Back to NY!!
Nice try, may be next time!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 14, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Hope and Anger do go hand in hand..Our hope was Hillary would be the first woman President. There will plenty of anger if she is not the Democratic nominee.
Posted by: mpwdc | April 14, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
guess Obama had to make up some answer to tell all of those wealthy people in San Francisco why small town Pennsylvanians were not falling at his feet to supporting him. He could have said they were “racists” but he put the same message in his more eloquent terms…antipathy..people who don’t look like them…I’m bitter about his words to describe the Heart of America, the very people who have supported him. Good thing he didn’t say that before Iowa ’cause we would have our nominee by now. Hillary/Edwards ’08
Posted by: mpwdc | April 14, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
I love Hillary supporters, they remind me of Browns fans. You have to admire any group that can take so much damage and keep smiling. At least the Browns pull off a hail mary every now and again.
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
right on rco!!! you tell em!
Si se puede :)
Posted by: Danny | April 14, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
I am Bitter about Economy and War!!
I support OBAMA!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 14, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
RC – Did you mention taking money from lobbyists? Yes, Obama does love sub prime money from the very lobbyists who throw Americans out on the street, Wright?
Obama has taken $1,180,103 from the top issuers of subprime loans. [cq.com]
Obama received $266,907 from Lehman. [Cq.com]
Obama received $5395 from GMAC. [Cq.com]
Obama received $150,850 from CS First Boston . [Cq.com]
Obama received $11,250 from Countrywide. [Cq.com]
Obama received $9052 from Washington Mutual. [Cq.com]
Obama received $161,850 from Citigroup. [Cq.com]
Obama received $4600 from CBASS. [Cq.com]
Obama received $170,050 from Morgan Stanley. [Cq.com]
Obama received $1150 from Centex. [Cq.com]
Obama received $351,900 from Goldman Sachs. [Cq.com]
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 14, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Al Gore, we need to hear you now!
An endorsement of Obama now would unlock the floodgates of superdelegates and end this nomination fight. We have to focus on McCain, because we can’t afford to lose again. NOT AGAIN!
Please Al, we need you now!
Posted by: Danny | April 14, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
At least the Browns pull off a hail mary every now and again.
Posted by: Keith
———————————
Hye Hillary won 2 ( then lost 1 in delegates) after loosing straight 13 states!!
go back To NY HILLARY!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 14, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Don’t worry Dogsoldier, Barack will have us out of Iraq a heck of a lot sooner than ole Hillary. she won’t even commit to a timeline to getting our troops out, just that she will begin a slow drawdown starting on day one of her presidency- way to stick your neck out there Hillary! What a great plan, and the media let’s her get away with it! Every analyst has said that Barack’s stance on ending the Iraq war is much more solid. She voted to put us there to begin with. For years she stood with Lieberman with an overt pro-war and pro-Israel stance. She suddenly became anti-war when she started running for president, just like she suddenly became against NAFTA when she started running for president. There is no authenticity in Hillary at all. She will tell you whatever she thinks will get her elected. Just like promising 125,000 new jobs in NY an NJ when running for senator of NY. Guess what? There was a net loss of 20,000-30,000 jobs, and she blamed it on Gore for not winning the presidential election. Gee thanks, way to step up there Hillary. Wake up Hillary lovers!
Posted by: rco | April 14, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
how about a link to substantiate and do you have Hill info to compareit to?
Posted by: Keith | April 14, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
LOBBY Money!
Lobbyists
Hillary Clinton (D) $865,290
John McCain (R) $590,952
Mitt Romney (R) $299,675
Rudolph W. Giuliani (R) $297,025
Christopher J. Dodd (D) $245,050
Bill Richardson (D) $193,950
Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D) $118,660
Fred Thompson (R) $118,450
Barack Obama (D) $115,163
Duncan Hunter (R) $31,150
John Edwards (D) $29,050
Mike Huckabee (R) $20,016
Tommy Thompson (R) $17,500
Sam Brownback (R) $15,225
Jim Gilmore (R) $6,250
Thomas J. Vilsack (D) $1,250
Tom Tancredo (R) $250
Dennis J. Kucinich (D) $201
That tells it all!
No one even near Clinton & McCain!
Posted by: Danny | April 14, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Rco – Wasn’t it Obama who blamed gun toting, church going, anti-immigrant, anti-trade small town bitter nuts for failing to support him? Now they’re also “angry” as well? Glad Obama said that and not Hillary.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
To bad he said what he said and got caught it is over for him this is not going away and the dumb a## media that was selling him is also going down the tubes rating’s were falling off until they made an American Idol. But what he said is not going away in GE and just remember he said it and did us in. He will never get pass the right wing machine watch for Mccain to start hauling in the money . He will not make it in to the White house.
Posted by: Bishop | April 15, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Dogsoldier,
You think we are sleeping, out of 230+ millions you are talking about GMAC insurance..5300+ are you nuts..
LIST HOW MUCH Clintons received from Lobbyists if you dare, this website will not have enough space to fill them all up!!
1300000 of us OBAMA supporters are the base of his huge donation, last month alone 40+ millions! Sorry even Clinton with her own money and lobbyists money combined could not dare to match that!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Danny – Obama took more than your figures from sub prime lenders alone. Show you oil money next.
Obama has taken $1,180,103 from the top issuers of subprime loans. [cq.com]
Obama received $266,907 from Lehman. [Cq.com]
Obama received $5395 from GMAC. [Cq.com]
Obama received $150,850 from CS First Boston . [Cq.com]
Obama received $11,250 from Countrywide. [Cq.com]
Obama received $9052 from Washington Mutual. [Cq.com]
Obama received $161,850 from Citigroup. [Cq.com]
Obama received $4600 from CBASS. [Cq.com]
Obama received $170,050 from Morgan Stanley. [Cq.com]
Obama received $1150 from Centex. [Cq.com]
Obama received $351,900 from Goldman Sachs. [Cq.com]
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Danny, with all those “elite” million-billionaires in SF Obama doesn’t need more lobby money…he’s busy putting these people in his pocket. Wonder what they will want from him IF he ever gets to the White House???
Posted by: mpwdc | April 15, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Dogsoldier,
You think we are sleeping, out of 230+ millions you are talking about GMAC insurance..5300+ are you nuts..
LIST HOW MUCH Clintons received from Lobbyists if you dare, this website will not have enough space to fill them all up!!
1300000 of us OBAMA supporters are the base of his huge donation, last month alone 40+ millions! Sorry even Clinton with her own money and lobbyists money combined could not dare to match that!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
“Hope and anger go hand in hand”??! What the hay is he talking about? What a load of BS. Love and hate walk together. Night and day bring the sun.
Is anybody buying this load of cr.. which he’s putting out in an incredibly desperate attenmpt to cover up the way he trashed average Americans “clinging” to their little pursuits. If people buy this, don’t blame anyone but yourselves later.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | April 15, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
mpwdc: I can answer that… all they asked for is a flag of old glory on the Golden Gate bridge!
Pretty cheap huh?
:-)
Oh, and dogsoldier, lest we forget the $800,000 that Bill received from Columbia to push CAFTA through!
What do you think will happen to even more PA jobs when that goes through? Get you head up out of your *ss and smell the coffee!
Posted by: Danny | April 15, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
He didn’t take money from lobbist but he did take it from thier family members.you can give the max even in your children’s name you can loan the max to some one to donate as long as you don’t die and cheat them out of it.
Posted by: Bishop | April 15, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
hoesprings52,
Your only hope now to over analyze Obama’s word to find something out of it, as Clintons has nothing more to offer of their own other then backstabbing others!
We did not expect anything better from Clintons and their supporters anyways!! So it is all good!
OBAMA Tells the truth and creates heartburn to Clinton supporters, as they are not used to hearing the truth..
Sniper fire, Monica, Cigar, NAFTA, War list goes on!!
IT IS TIME FOR TRUTH!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
If you have followed the news today, reports have surfaced on the major news outlets of quotes from big Bill Clinton when he ran for President, that sound remarkably similar to what Obama has said about small town voters. If it’s good enough for Bill- and you know how much you hillary lovers love Bill, and his wonderful 8 years as President. As a reminder, Bill was a newbie outsider who had no experience other than being the Governor of Arkansas. No one questioned Bill’s experience because- guess what?- he offered a platform of CHANGE and HOPE. The voters said ‘yes we can’ to Bill, and they will say ‘yes we can’ to Obama!
Posted by: rco | April 15, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
None of those guys in the big house ever admit that they are guilty. What’s so new about OB’s damage control tactics ? Talking sh-t about the hard-working middle class people behind the closed door and got caught on tape is the real act of HOPE and CHANGE. Such a hypocrite!
Posted by: mtr2311 | April 15, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Let’s be fair. Hillary didn’t say what Obama said. She didn’t make him say what he said. He’s a grown up and knows what he said and is responsible for it. His words speak for thesmelves. It’s Obama who is constantly clairfying what he actually meant and spinning to try to make it sound ok. His words speak for themselves. His words are what have gotten him this far. They are his own doing both for good or bad.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | April 15, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
A lot of parrots here again , no brains , just repeating lines from McCain and Clinton ” Obama is an elitist ” ! Getting desperate aren’t we !? Gimme a break , Obama has spent his adult life working with and for the poor , the working class and the disadvantaged when he could have been a hot shot corporate lawyer making the big money . Who’s elitist , someone who works with the poor and lower income working class or someone ( Clinton ) who goes to work as a corporate lawyer for Walmart ? She was on the board of Walmart for six years . Who’s going to be working for us regular every day working people , someone who will not sell himself to the corporations and lobbyists and take ( bribe ) money from them or Hillary Clinton who is for sale , gladly takes their money and actually defends lobbyists ! Now come election time She’s against NAFTA , she spent years promoting and praising Bill Clinton’s NAFTA . She’s against the Columbia free trade agreement too , meanwhile her top campaign man is being paid by and working for the Columbian government to lobby in Washington for the agreement and hubby Bill Clinton is for it … hmmmm , something doesn’t smell right Hillary ! You think she is in touch and has any idea what real life is like for most of us or that she actually gives a damn ? Not a chance ! What she says and what she actually does and has done don’t add up at all .She is a dirty lying corrupt politician who will do and say anything to get your vote . Yesssirrreeee folks , she dodged sniper fire in Bosnia , had to run for cover ! But she didn’t lie she just misspoke ! What ? If you’ve ever been shot at you would know it and will never forget it believe me , she repeated this lie on several different occasions , one lie of many others . Most of you are just plain old racists and cannot stand the idea that a man who is half black has the nerve to run for President and that he will very likely be our next President in spite of all Clinton and the Republican’s lies and smear campaigns ! Some of you are afraid , oh my God a black man ! What will he do to us ! Pathetic and stupid people . Look what the current white genius ” President” of ours has done to us and to this country ! It isn’t about race or gender , it’s about electing someone who will work for the people and for the good of the country not for the lobbyists , corporations and special interests and the wealthy elite and that someone is Obama , it sure is not McCain or the corporate, lobbyist and special interest money loving vote for sale Clinton ! And yes I am getting a bitter and pissed off , I am a working man with a family stuggling to make it week to week month after month and year after year and I have been getting crapped on by the politicians for too long just like a lot of you here ! Obama 08
Posted by: Jim D | April 15, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
RC – Took a moment to find reliable info. Here. In February 2008, according to a Campaign Finance Institute analysis of the latest official campaign receipts, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) raised 56 percent of his contributions in increments of $200 or less, while Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) raised 52 percent in similar amounts.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
“bitter”: poor choice of words
“sniper fire”: lie (repeated several times)
take your pick.
Posted by: balthus | April 15, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Obama never thought that Wright’s sermons would see the light of day. And he never thought that his analysis of working class voters in PA for a well-heeled San Fran fundraising crowd would see the light of day. We’re fortunate to get a look behind the mask. What we do with this knowledge is up to each of us.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | April 15, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
LISTEN FOLKS,THE ONLY WAY TO SHOW THE WORLD AND OBAMA THAT WE ARE NOT BITTER HERE IS TO MAKE SURE THAT HE WINS THE STATE.IF HILLARY WINS,THEN THE WHOLE WORLD WILL REALLY REALLY KNOW AND SEE US AS “BITTER”
Posted by: pat | April 15, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
I am bitter about economy and war!
But I support Obama!
Do Obama has to please everybody with all his words everyday? Cannot speak his mind and say what he thinks! Remember nobody other then President in N. Korea and former Iraq get 99% of the vote in Presidential election!!
If you want that kind of dummy President Vote for Clinton or McCain, but if you want an Honest President, give OBAMA a chance!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Ironically, according to new reports tonight, McCain feels more in a comfort zone running against Hillary, because he can shape his own platform as the ‘maverick’, the one who seeks ‘change’, the ‘outsider’, etc. Under this scenario, Hillary would be pegged as McCain’s entrenched Washington insider opponent. He would talk about new politics versus the old tired politics of the elitist liberal Clintons. Obama reportedly takes him out of his comfort zone, and he has to run as the Bush surrogate, old Washington insider, old man, out of touch warmonger, etc. These are two radically different platforms for McCain, but he would much rather run the anti-Hillary campaign theme. He somehow fancies himself the ‘cool’ candidate who wants to ‘stand up to the old Washington Insiders’ like the Clintons. Go figure, Obama will have taught him a thing or two about how to run against the near-incumbent candidate, Hillary.
Posted by: rco | April 15, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Can you tell for your self that Pa is a no frills state thats what I love about it you know Bitching is second nature and so is crying about how broke you are thier are more college’s in the state I don’t know to many people who have not been to some college.We don’t cling to guns and we grew up going to church and god is an everyday think and so is dowing shots and shooting guns.
Posted by: Bishop | April 15, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
I don’t trust Obama. I really don’t. He hides his real opinions with his words and tells people what they want to hear. He spins it away.
Posted by: Henry | April 15, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Obama! Yo Momma!
“hope and anger go together”????
Hitler also justified the two going hand in hand. Its all about “CHANGE”, making the world a better place.
This guy dosn’t have a clue!
We need to stick to the candidates with experience we can trust…….Hillary and McCain won’t start a revolution in the name of Anger and hope.
Posted by: j | April 15, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Obama! Yo Momma!
“hope and anger go together”????
Hitler also justified the two going hand in hand. Its all about “CHANGE”, making the world a better place.
This guy dosn’t have a clue!
We need to stick to the candidates with experience we can trust…….Hillary and McCain won’t start a revolution in the name of Anger and hope.
Posted by: j | April 15, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Apparently, it’s not a poor choice of word. The dude meant what he said and he got caught on tapes. There is only so much the dude can lie his way out this time. People are not that dumb as he thought they were. By April 22, the dude will eat his own words.
Posted by: mtr2311 | April 15, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
ObamaKnew – FL and MI did not vote for Obama did they? No! Well, to he*l with them! Give them to the republicans. So how many caucuses will Obama win in the general?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
ObamaKnew,
Do you know Fair Play? You cannot change the rule of the game after you already played the game. FL & MI knew their votes will not count before they even voted! Why certain change of heart now, because your 5th Feb Super Tuesday did not work out good for you? Nice try but Rule is Rule, if you want to change it may be next time!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
RC – Fair play? Rules? Well, you idiot, you just gave two swing states to the republicans. Great way to start the general. May I suggest the Brittany Spears detox program to get you off the koolaid?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Two problems with only checking the overall numbers with open secrets:
METHODOLOGY: The totals on these charts are calculated from PAC contributions and contributions from individuals giving more than $200, as reported to the Federal Election Commission. Individual contributions are generally categorized based on the donor’s occupation/employer, although individuals may be classified instead as ideological donors if they’ve given more than $200 to an ideological PAC.
Lobbyists contribute to candidates without using PAC’s to hide the money and as individual contributions. The are not flagged by the FEC. Most lobbyists are attorneys/lawyers. Obama and Clinton both have about the same campaign contributions from lawyers and law firms. Other industry and citizen lobbyists are also not necessarily associated with PAC’s. Did you know Obama has a PAC of his own that he used to filter 800K to superdelegates to buy the votes of 34 of them? Clinton only filtered 19K and she already had the support of the superdelegates who recieved monies for their legislative efforts. Did you know that Obama has many lobbyists working for him on his campaign and had to retract some things he said bad about lobbyists since he was caught using them?
Lobbyists are not all bad either. This is how things get done. Without them, disabled children, the elderly, breast cancer victims, etc. would not have a voice in our political process. Failure to work with lobbyists results in a failure to get the job done – much like Carter. It is important to understand the process in order to understand what those statistics on open secrets really tell us.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Hye Dog,
We will win 4 swing states or Red states, so what is the big deal!! MI will vote for Republican, don’t dare to bet on it, if Obama goes to general!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Don’t stress out people. A week from today, we will know if this dude can make any CHANGE or not and I think NOT. Let’s leave it up to folks in Penn sate. As far as the recent poll goes, this dude is toasted.
Posted by: mtr2311 | April 15, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
DCV – What time is it down your way?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Obama will not shame America into voting for him. He can shame the Democrats, but it won’t work in the general.
Posted by: Nicholas | April 15, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
RC – MI republican? Don’t bet on it if you recall Hastert Republican house leader who retired and his seat was won by a democrat as somewhat of a suprise. The governor is democrat. So, democrats might do better in MI then you imagine this year if they don’t hold the democrats responsible for failing to count their votes. Without that problem I’d say we HAD a good change, now I’m not sure.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Nicholas,
Keep trying, Hillary supports said the same before IOWA..this is nothing new to us after 80% of primary votes already counted!!By the way your Rep buddies will have not enough voters to support the YOUNG MCCAIN!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Dog,
As a Dem, I will support Hillary over McCain, any day!! No more War!!We do not need 100 years of War!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Actually, when 30 percent of Hillary supporters vote for McCain, Obama will be going back to the Senate.
McCain is now leading Obama in a head to head poll. Why do you think that is? It’s Hillay voters! :)
Instead of Yes We Can…it should be OH YES THEY WILL!
Posted by: Nicholas | April 15, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Nicholas,
Just count the votes not those stupid polls, you Grandpa McCain will not win over OBAMA or Hillary, Period.
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
The Republican voters will come out in November. Anyone who assumes that they won’t is just clearly not thinking.
Obama is losing the white middle income to lower income voters.
The Democrats never win when they lose that portion of the Democratic party.
Posted by: Nicholas | April 15, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
RC – No more war, huh? To tell the truth, I’m more worried about Iran than Iraq at the moment. Because Iran will get their nukes and if they threaten Israel whose sitting on 300+, according to best estimates, then we may well be the first humans in history to bare witness to nuclear war in our time and on our watch. In any case, Hillary or Obama will remove troops. The fundamentalists will claim the win while various factions go about the business of sorting the middle east out. The entire region will be in flames for years and if any of us think we see high gas prices now none of us have seen anything yet.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Oh Great Spiritual Adviser Obama,
It’s yin and yang, it’s love and hate, it’s a nickel with two heads on both sides.
========================================
What it is is bitterness!
Obama, bitter, bitter, Oboma!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 15, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Isn’t this what his church teaches?
It’s the dumb whites who do everything bad?
It’s the dumb whites with their guns, churches, and anti-immigrant stances.
Posted by: ObamaManNOMore | April 15, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
WCM – You still awake lad?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Crack Head,
You Republican are trying so heard acting as a Hillary Supporters!! Don’t wait we will see you in General, we will wipe out your Red states and make all Blue!!
YES WE CAN!! OBAMA08!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Dogsoldier – it is ET here in DC so 1:14 AM or so, I’d say that’s right about the time people start realizing Obama may have destroyed not just his own chance to win the nomination but also the possibility of Democrats winning the White House and a greater majority in Congress. Given the number of Obama surrogates who may be drowning their sorrows worrying about what to do instead of out supporting Obama in his time of peril, ’tis a sad time in DC for the lot of ‘em.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
DCV – It’s 11:22 MT. Just waiting for the next Obama explanation of what he really, really, really, really, really, really, meant in San Fran this time.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
I see most of them all went to a pro-Obama site/thread or elsewhere to express their anger. But you can bet they will return with yet more copy and paste rhetoric. Some of the Obama supporters are ok though – we just disagree. The ones that are not hateful and immature are likely to support whomever the nominee is for the dems.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
One important fact that many voters are unaware of is that whenever we had a moderate controlled Democratic congress, the country prospered economically and socially regardless of the party the President belonged to. From that persepective, the more important races are for Congress not President. Unfortunately, with so many voters tending to cast their vote along party lines, the presidential race is the one that influences congressional race results. This is why so many party power players are concerned – not because they are split between Clinton and Obama – but because they are worried a Democrat will not win in Nov. The electability argument has therefore become even more important and I think Clinton has that argument won. We shall see in July what happens. If the DNC was smart, they would have moved the convention to July instead of August.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
DCV – For the most part you are a kind and forgiving soul. Out here in oil country when you work with tobacco chewing, cursing, cattle eating for vegetable, spiting, rough necks, little fellows like Obama could pass for a woman.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Cracker,
You fool, I SAID YOU ARE A CRACK HEAD!
(*_*) not HARD!!
Go back to school kid!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
I hear ya Dogsoldier – back in Texas they, the oil field workers, refer to themselves as roughnecks for a reason… they are proud of that nick! But I do truly believe that Clinton can and will represent the interests of all Americans as she always has. She has never forgotten her roots. Speaking of oil, I havent seen any talk among the politicians about the Brazil oil discovery… wonder if they are figuring that into the economic recovery plan in the interim for oil supply.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Cracker – LOL.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
DCVoter ad Dog,
Two of your Romantic Hillary stories making me sleep!
Goodnight and sweet dream about Clintons in NYC after Aug!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
The hypersensitivity to the word “bitter” is exactly the response of someone who’s “bitter”. All this “spin” just punctuates his point. Don’t get in denial, like your just singing and dancing about NAFTA, the economy, small towns drying up. It just sounds weird to make a claim that all these negative things are just “great”. Obama’s trying to bring attention to your problems and restore your communities since Clinton has ignored the problems. Yes, I said it. Don’t get played! She doesn’t give a rip about you, just your vote.
Posted by: Momuv2 | April 15, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
DCV – I read the Brazil story. Gonna be years before that baby comes on line. I’ll be transfered up to the Canadian oil sands projects next week. We have two $10 billion plants up there shipping oil south to America.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
Crack Head!
You are right, f** ur English, lets talk about some Computational Fluid Dynamics!! Knew why Hillary does not get educated voter’s votes. They only know little English, as Chinese people know Chinese language! Little water frogs!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
Clinton (without Obama supporters) has the equivalent of 260+ electoral votes so far.
Obama (without Clinton supporters) has the equivalent of 150+ electoral votes so far.
Red states do not count for the dems.
Latest polls project Clinton wins PA by 20 points and IN by 16. That would add 32 electoral votes for Clinton’s total to surpass the 270 to win.
Latest polls project Obama wins NC by 20 points but NC is red so he would get 0 electoral votes for that state.
Clinton is clearly more electable in Nov against McCain.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am
Hillary was unavailable for comment since we can’t tell just which white hooded robe she’s in at the cross burning on a lawn in Chicago.
Posted by: kravitz | April 15, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
It amazes me how quickly people forget. Of course hope and anger go together. Thats exactly what he was talking about in his speech on March 18th. When he said and I quote the anger is real and to wish it away without understanding it is to widen the gulf. Yes he was talking about race then but its the SAME principle. 81% of the country thinks that we are on the wrong track and you dont think there’s some angry people in there then you are living in a fantasy land as McCain and Hilary seem to be doing. These communities are devastated because of trade policies like nafta coupled with 10 billion dollars per month going to Iraq. I dont live in a small town and I’m angry so I’m sure there is anger in these economically devastated towns.
Carol
Posted by: Carol | April 15, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
RC – Computational Fluid Dynamics specialists had a difficult problem explaining Asian tsunami and its destructiveness.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Good deal Dogsoldier. My point about the Brazil discovery is “projected reserves”. Most people outside the oil industry dont understand how that works in terms of the world’s oil supply like we do. (I dont work that industry anymore but some of the family still does.) As we both know, much of the stock market on oil is based on future reserves not actual.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
kravitz – Cross burning? Were you a participant?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
DCVotes,
In the land of Blind, One eye man is a King!!
Hillary is losing in every category, now you trying to make your own chart to make you happy. That is a pathetic try!! LOL! Instead of rest of the Primaries, should Dems listen to your silly arguments? I do not think so! Tell it to Dog, he will love it! LOL!
OBAMA08! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
Crack Head,
Do you know anything about Aerospace Engineering? or Science or you just good as being a spell checkers at the blogs! Get a life!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | April 15, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
DCV – Correct. Actual and future are no man’s land for the uninitiated.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
You can bet there will be one or more candidates for President and Congress working on a trade agreement with Brazil for the oil. Unfortunately, OPEC will enter into the picture making it more complex.
Speaking of trade, Obama has the audacity to say he is anti-NAFTA when he pushed the Peru agreement through and Clinton was against it as well as Edwards (who doesnt have a vote). Obama also proposes similar NAFTA-like agreements with asian countries. With the behind-the-scenes assurances to Canada that he wont change NAFTA combined with those facts (source: Obama via debates), we can be sure he is pro-NAFTA even though he is saying he is not. Actions speak louder than words!
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
First there was Hope with Obama. Now, there’s just Anger.
Posted by: echo | April 15, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
RC – Black holes? Hawkins radiation? Quasars? Einstein crosses? Solar sails? New NASA craft to replace shuttle? What do you want to discuss?
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
Obama’s audacity of hope is hoping the voters wont learn the truth about his record… hoping no one sees the videos of Wright… hoping no one knows about his house… hoping no one knows about his earmarks to buy his wife the hospital VP slot with a doubling of her salary… hoping no one noticed he bought stock in a biotech then pushed through legislation to increase its value… hoping no one knows about his associations with people who support terrorism… hoping he can buy the votes to win the nom… hoping he can scare people with his surrogates threats of riots and upheaval based on race… hoping no one records what he says at private fundraisers… oops… hope is lost.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
RC – Or turning like jets do here in normal atmosphere.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
THIS OBAMA REMARKS IS NOT A BIG DEAL.
WHY??
BECAUSE IT IS THE TRUTH. ECONOMICS HAD BADLY AFFECTED PEOPLE’S LIVE IN THIS COUNTRY WHICH HAD LED US BITTER. OBAMA ALWAYS SAYS THE TRUTH SO SOME PEOPLE HATE HIM BECAUSE OF THAT. HILLARY AND MCCAINS ARE CRITICISING AND MISQUOTING HIM FOR NOTHING. AT THE END, TRUTH WILL PREVAIL . MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA.
Posted by: I.A.T. Smith | April 15, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
THIS OBAMA REMARKS IS NOT A BIG DEAL.
WHY??
BECAUSE IT IS THE TRUTH. ECONOMICS HAD BADLY AFFECTED PEOPLE’S LIVE IN THIS COUNTRY WHICH HAD LED US BITTER. OBAMA ALWAYS SAYS THE TRUTH SO SOME PEOPLE HATE HIM BECAUSE OF THAT. HILLARY AND MCCAINS ARE CRITICISING AND MISQUOTING HIM FOR NOTHING. AT THE END, TRUTH WILL PREVAIL . MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA.
Posted by: I.A.T. Smith | April 15, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
When the phone rings at the Oval Office at 0200H, will it be necessary for the Secret Service to put on first a teleprompter?
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am
DCV – LOL.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 15, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am
The primary race in PA is becoming a circus!
This process has deteriorated thanks to the Clinton’s. They know what “strings to pull” in the PA demographics and the voters there seem to be receptive to how they are being messaged by the Clinton campaign.
For the most part, we already understood that race would play a major role in your individual voting decision and that you were not seriously considering Barack in the first place. So why all this noise about why you’re not voting for him.
During your states fifteen minutes of fame, you have exhibited bittereness unlike we have not seen in the rest of the country.
You will clearly reject Barack when given the chance on 4/22. That is your privilege but after so many years of the Clinton’s and McCain being in Washington, I just don’t understand what you believe they will do for you once the campaigns leave your state and they get back to “comfortable” in Washington.
You cling to those who have sent your jobs across the seas or across the border? It’s hard to understand your lack of desire for change.
I’ll just be happy to see the campaigns move on out of PA.
Posted by: Reggie | April 15, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am
Let’s see….what does Obama really think….
——-
Typical white people, just like his granny, are racist..
Rural America are bitter folk clinging to guns and religion, who are anti-immigrants and anything foreign.
Obams’s hate-filled wife says “for the first time she is proud of America and that America is downright mean.”
Obama’s pastor of 20 years says “God damn America.”
——-
I ask you – do we really want a president who by his comments, actions and associations doesn’t just look down his nose at America, but who also has such SEETHING DISDAIN and hate for our people? The answer is NO!
People – it’s not too late. STOP this charade now!
Posted by: cc | April 15, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am
Sounds like a Reverand Wright mentality. Anger, bitterness…….wonderful qualities to lead our country with.
Posted by: KH | April 15, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
If your not bitter, or angry, your not paying attention!
Posted by: matt | April 15, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
I USED TO BE BITTER!
I USED TO BE HOPEFUL!
NOW, I’M SIMPLY CONVINCED THAT OUR COUNTRY WILL BE RESTORED AND OUR BEST DAYS ARE IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE “CHANGE HAPPENS”!
OBAMA/WEBB ’08
Posted by: Roxanne | April 15, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
You know what? Some of you are the exact kind of people who have voted yourselves into the economic slump you’re in right now, based on the exact state of mind you’re showing us here in these comments. Wake up. You are not stupid people. You’re defensive and sensitive and you’re stubborn. How long is that attitude going to keep hurting you and your kids before you realize you’re being manipulated? Barack Obama is a GOOD MAN, and no one has any reason to believe otherwise.
Posted by: Megan | April 15, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Face it there is no explaining this to a Hillary supporter.
I think the only people upset by this are those who are already in Clinton’s Camp, and some how they think showing self righteous indignation is going to sway someone else.
The problem is they have seen this before with the Republican attack machine, it worked and what did they get? One big disappointment.
Obama is still up by 10 points nationaly, and is still down by only 6 in PA. This is not what Hillary and her supporters want.
Well I guess she has nothing better to run on.
Posted by: Thinking | April 15, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
I would also like to add that there is nothing exclusive about hope and anger. How do you think women marched for the vote, or how the civil rights movement was created? OR unions? Do you think those people weren’t angry? Were they all just pollyanna, singing hymns and holding hands? NO. They were angry and they were full of hope for a better future. That is the kind of positive energy necessary to make big changes in this world. Righteous anger, and sincere faith and hope. You know a lot of you feel it. You feel anger when you think about where you are, and you feel hope when you think about where you could be.
Posted by: Megan | April 15, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Clinton has lied about everything from NAFTA, S-Chip, Ireland, Bosnia to her helping NY’er get jobs when she actually has a net loss in Buffalo. She will lie about anything as she is a sociopath.
Wake up Clinton people. Her husband lost both houses of Congress and was impeached
Posted by: Tony | April 15, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Nice try Obama but no cigar! Just like Wright your answers keep coming. The problem is You can fool some of the people part of the time but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time!
Posted by: liz | April 15, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
No, it’s more about this: people will vote against their own economic interests since they don’t believe anything is going to change for the better economically. So Karl Rove and his buddies can put gay marriage on the agenda, or spout off about how ‘the Democrats want to take away your guns’ – and get people riled up to vote Republican. Then, W and company can give tax breaks to the top 1%, do nothing to help middle America or small towns, and get away with, literally, murder.
Posted by: indie17 | April 15, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Huh?
His hope story has changed now that he got busted talking behind closed doors in San Francisco.
Posted by: Jay | April 15, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Are we hopefully bitter or bitterly hopeful?
Posted by: geevill | April 15, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Read the entire transcript of what Obama said in SF and then make your decision. If you don’t, then you’re letting the Hillary Clinton and John McCain make your decision for you.
IN CONTEXT, Obama was explaining why small town voters often vote against their own economic interests. It’s because they feel it won’t make a difference because the politicians don’t do anything. Instead they vote on other issues they care about.
In no way, shape or form did Obama say that people become religious or militant or racist or bigoted because they are bitter. Read for yourself. Google is your friend.
Posted by: JCinDE | Apr 14, 2008 11:09:54 PM
THANK YOU, JC! EXACTLY! This has been MIS-REPORTED and REPRESENTED!
He meant they VOTE to their Religious and other interests, (guns, Gay rights…)…because they have lost the belief that voting for better economic conditions will actually DO ANYTHING because it HASN’T for DECADES!!
Posted by: Sam | April 15, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Even Jesus had issues with the Pharasies.They wanted to kill religion with their tradition. This is abt Obama Vs Old tradition of Washington.
Posted by: dd111 | April 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Anger can be a tool for positive action. There’s nothing wrong with anger.
Posted by: James | April 15, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
And BTW…This conversation DOES NOTHING to better the lives of Americans!
BUT…its Clinton old-style POLITICS!
Want four more years, Folks?
Posted by: Sam | April 15, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
I think U S Citizens can no longer recognize the truth.
How anyone in their right mind could still be supporting Hilliary, a person of no integrity and full of lies, is beyond my ability to understand.
Posted by: Denice | April 15, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Notice how Hillary supporters, no matter what the article reads, are always in attack mode. “Go Back to Indonesia” he’s an “elitist” etc. Very similar to their “Democratic” candidate in that way. They can never say indisputably why their candidate is better. Hillary supporters step to the plate. Why is your candidate better? Or, are you not capable of doing it without personal attacks.
I support Barack Obama because he is not George Bush.
Barack has always publicly opposed stupid war in Iraq, that’s crippling our economy, and is committed to ending it.
He wants to provide tax cuts to working class and not the wealthiest (John McCain wants them to be permanent) that can afford to pay taxes.
I support Barack because he has a plan to encourage companies to keep jobs her in America. And stimulate job growth her in US.
I support him because he really does know the difference between Shia and Sunni Muslims.
The # 1 reason I support Obama over Clinton is because, unlike McCain and Clinton, I don’t have a short memory. I remember the embarrassment the Clinton administration caused the democratic party and the US. I remember sexual harassment claims, accusations of rape, Janet Reno, Ken Starr, White Water hearings, and rise of GOP New World Order. When it comes to electablility, these are all things McCain’s campaign will force us to deal with again.
Time for America to turn the page.
Posted by: maxwellinformed | April 15, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Obama wasn’t being condescending; he showing empathy. Similar to Bill Clinton’s “I feel your pain” comment.
———
From Newsweek:
While conceding that he “regret[ted] some of the words [he] chose,” Obama said Friday at a town hall meeting in Terre Haute, Indiana, that his San Francisco slip was simply shorthand for the argument that Thomas Frank made in his 2004 bestseller, “What’s the Matter with Kansas?”–i.e., that Republicans use social wedge issues to convince lower-income Americans to vote against their economic interests. “They don’t vote on economic issues because they don’t expect anybody’s going to help them,” Obama said. “So people end up, you know, voting on issues like guns, and are they going to have the right to bear arms. They vote on issues like gay marriage. And they take refuge in their faith and their community and their families and things they can count on. But they don’t believe they can count on Washington.” In other words, I didn’t mean that small-town voters suddenly discover religion or guns because they’ve lost their jobs, but rather that they feel so “bitter” after decades of empty economic promises that some now “cling to” guns or religion as *electoral issues*.
Posted by: Stacey | April 15, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Reading through the comments it is clear that Hillary’s plan to brainwash people on how to think about a fellow Democrat is working to some extent.
Sad.
How many have actually listened to what Obama said and formed their own opinion? It’s a non-issue being over-used in the eleventh hour of a failing campaign.
Obama was talking about people VOTING based on guns and religion and gay marriage instead of issues that will help their everyday lives. He speculates that they do this because they are bitter and don’t believe anymore that the government can or will help them economically.
I have often wondered myself why people choose a candidate based on social issues when they are at risk for losing their JOBS and HOUSES. I guess Obama has thought a lot about this, too. Good for him.
So many people seem SO eager to find fault in everybody. Obama is not perfect, but he is smart and different and trying very hard to change a badly broken system and a hurting (bitter) country.
By the measure of politicians–Republican and Democrat–over history, Barack Obama is astonishingly honest and open-minded. Difficult for many to see or believe. We have become a country of cynics and it is sad.
Posted by: Em | April 15, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Bitter doesn’t even begin to describe it. Senator Obama is a breath of fresh air. This country is broken. Senator Clinton has proven herself to be devoid of character. Whatever solutions she may have been able to offer have been drowned in a tub of her own making. Where is the leadership of the DNC? How long is this nightmare going to be allowed to go on?
Posted by: charlotte | April 15, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
I love how people let the media decide for them instead of reading about the actual candidates, or reading about was actually said. I hope and dream that America will wake up someday and think for themselves.
Posted by: Jacob | April 15, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Thank you Stacey! I think everyone is so eager to jump out and label Obama in a negative fashion- so desperate, that they didn’t really hear the message in the speech. I thought the responses from Clinton and McCain were out of touch and typical negative politics, which is the only thing we will see from both…negative negative negative. If that is all you can give the American people then we are really really in trouble. I need a president that gives me some hope for my children’s future- NOT BIG MONEY Politics(something that Clinton(s) love to do)
Posted by: Greg | April 15, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
People can’t own their emotions of anger and bitterness because we are conditioned to ignore these feelings. The people in the clinton ad look angry and bitter to me. Most people who don’t take care of their physical appearance have some sort of repressed anger. These people are not even close to being on a path of enlightenment or self-actualization, as is Obama, so they take the statements negatively, instead of objectively, as I’m sure he intended. Obama views the world differently than these people, for sure – with more emotional maturity and the ability to self-evaluate, which these people clearly can’t do.
Posted by: BestOne | April 15, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Hey everybody, read the entire story about Rev. Wright’s 911 speech on Anderson 360. You’re not being told the full story. I’m not defending anyone, I’m just being objective. Also read Obama’s complete speech from the Huffington Post. Yes, he used some wrong words but look at the ultimate point he was trying to make. People are angry at the way they have been ignored by the government. Thanks to the present administration, the middle class has been diminished. There is now rich or poor. Wake up America and stop fighting about personalities! It’s time to join together against the Republican establishment for they only care about the rich. We’re in a war that has helped destroy our economy!
Posted by: Margie | April 15, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
It amazing to me how racist people are in the country. Obama initial comments were in response to an audience members question about why white people in middle America were racist and wouldn’t vote for him. Obama’s response was that they were not racist, but that they were bitter due to economic strife and tended to cling to those things that were familiar to them. Anyone from a small town knows that guns and religion are a very BIG part of “small town” America. Obama did not make any nefarious comments about this lifestyle, but rather he used it as a way to explain this phenomenon that has been deeply rooted in small town communities that are predominately white.
Lastly, I believe that there will be a few people that will not vote for Obama based on these comments. However, they were not going to vote for him anyway. They will use the comments as an excuse not to vote for Obama, rather than reveal the real reason they won’t vote for him.
Posted by: Sheryl | April 15, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Let us not forget the “mispoken”, Bosnia LIE spoken many times by Mrs Clinton. Would you rather have a President who is a well known self serving liar like she is. Didn’t we just go thru that with Bushs and clinton over the last 16 years? And why would anybody think that Bush/ Clinton, Bush/Clinton is in any way good for this country. It would be a dual monarchy and that is not what we are about as Americans. Come on people, wake up
Posted by: steve | April 15, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Yeah, people are bitter, but Obama has no real plan to deal with it. His rambling about health insurances is just ridiculous. He can try and copy the German (30% of the entire budget per year go into “social” stuff, usually supporting immigrants who don’t want to work and pointless integration measures) or Austrian (health insurances with a deficit of ~470 million USD) system. Good luck for it, it’ll fail, big time. Obama has no clue how the world works, that damn snob with his racist friends.
Obama will run America down. Just wait and see. In 2012 I’ll be telling you “Told you so”.
Posted by: Takekaze | April 15, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
OBAMA IS 100% RIGHT. Hillary has underestimated the very anger, distress and contempt in the electorate. Some of us are mad as hell and will not settle for her warmed over 1990′s Clinton Doubletalk. History, if it is has shown anything, is that the CLINTON’S LIE 100% OF THE TIME. Clinton’s are faux middle class warriors, faux feminists. Everything about Hillary is a damn lie from her experience, qualifications to her memory of history. HILL IS A SHILL for powerful entrenched interests in the United States but she runs a campaign that dupes those on the left side of the bell curve into believing that her crusade is to protect the little guy. FRAUD IS WHAT HILLARY CLINTON IS.
Posted by: Christopher London | April 15, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
I cling to my bitterness and have hope for my anger.
Posted by: Robert F. | April 15, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
I am LOL. For those of you who think the republican machine can marginalized barack obama or make him out to be an “elistist” is funny to me. He is a black man from a small town that has maybe a few million in assets ($991,000 income) from previous tax returns and has a Mortgage that he pays monthly,and just paid off his school loans. This is a guy who may have more assets than the regular joe but still needs to budget. He can’t write himself a $5 million dollar loan to fund his campaign. Hillary needs to get out of the race. It’s over. Our best chance to win this thing is with Barack Obama. 47% of the electorate hates her and don’t trust her. Because Hilliary decided not to fight fair she will lose her base. African Americans are already pissed and I don’t think they’d come back in Nov. Hopefully, the vote we’d lose from her constituencies can be made up with the enthusiasim and new voters BO has been bringing into the
Democratic party. If the choice is between Hilliary or McCain even if you don’t agree w/his policies he still seems the more trustworthy.
Posted by: sheila | April 15, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Yes, if you criticise Obama you are a racist. If you’re religious and from a small towwn, its because you are bitter. and so on.
Obama is a corrupt man, a liar, and and a racist in his own right. If you are concerned about American racism, it is time to move forward, and that means ANYBODY but Obama.
Posted by: James | April 15, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
you know, i’m tired of people going on and on about obama needing a teleprompter. i have seen him speak, and last time i checked… there was no teleprompter present. there were however, 20,000 people who were elated to see the future president. OBAMA 08
Posted by: joel | April 15, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Yes we’re angry at losing our jobs and homes, at losing our kids to a shameless war, at losing our Constitutional rights, at being stiffed by 30 years of politicians who have turned us against ourselves. Obama is not afraid to articulate that anger and his message of hope rings loud and clear because it rings through this fog of anger and hopelessness and signals CHANGE is possible.
Posted by: joanno | April 15, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
I’m most troubled by the seemingly numerous posts here that sound like talking points. Seems to me the Clinton campaigners are out in force flooding comment fields with the SAME broken record. Seriously, how many of these comments sound like an ad copywriter wrote them? Each talking point is carefully included. Come on, are we really going to do this to the internet too?
Now I am bitter…AND hopeless…anyone who can’t see the context of what Obama said is, to be an elite myself, an idiot. The man was speaking about how Republicans use prayer in school and second amendment issues to obscure discussion about concrete issues of economics and health care and such. He was speaking to an educated crowd of people who would have no problem following the reasoning. Why do we have to “dumb down” every comment…isn’t this guy running for President of the US? Don’t we WANT someone who is smarter than not in that spot?
Wow…I guess we’d rather have someone we feel at ease having a beer with…
Did I mention the lack of hope that the reality of our political process brings?
Posted by: Rick | April 15, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
RE: Bitter comments -Obama discussed the same valid point in 2004 at a sit down interview with Charlie Rose remarks. Bill Clinton has made these remarks,Hillary Clinton has made them too. There’s a book call “What’s the Matter with Kansas” that makes the exact same point. It’s not new but it’s a strategy the Republican openly admit to using quite successfully. People vote against their economic interest because they don’t think anything will get done anyway. Instead they turn to comfort/emotional/moral issues that they believe to be attainable. I know people who voted for George Bush in 2004 and were worse off than before the voted for him in 2000. I asked why and they voted for him if their life was getting worse and they told me either gay marriage or anit-abortion issues. People vote the way they want but it doesn’t make what Obama says untrue. You can call it controversial but it’s still true and he’s not the only one who knows it.
Posted by: marecelite | April 15, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Yes, I agree that anger and hope goes hand in hand, agree w/Obama 100%.
I am bitter, angry, frustrated w/economy, society, White House, the whole bit but yet I do have HOPE and I’m looking for CHANGE that’s why I’m voting for Obama!!!
OBAMA 08!!!!
Posted by: HOPE!!! | April 15, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
I agree w/u Sister, I’m bitter also but have not given up on HOPE. I realize also that some people do resort to violence but I cling to my faith.
My vote is OBAMA!
Posted by: Myra | April 15, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
So many bitter people. I must find out what medication Hillary is on.. I want to be so happy about everything. Is the Blue Pill Dem and the Red Pill Rep ??
Posted by: William R | April 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Hope someone can help with my dilemma.
I’ve found in my music collection, recordings by Steven Curtis Chapman and Dwight Yoakum (Hold on to God) in which they sing “cling to Jesus” and so forth. After I burned all their CD’s, I found several old hymns in my methodist hymnal in which we used to sing about “Clinging to the cross” and again, the popular “cling to Jesus” phrase. Is it okay for me to burn these old hymnals or would that be sacralegious?
Posted by: xavieronassis | April 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
anger = resentment = destructive change
desire = hope = positive change
Obama is a farce. All eyes should be opened. I am willing to be that he knows more that he is unprepared than the Obamites that follow him.
Posted by: nocity | April 15, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
@al, you are angry at the govt at large, so you are bitter at the politians, which makes you cling to things you know best, and finally, you have hope because a president like Obama is on horizon!
Hope that helps..
Posted by: RO | April 15, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Will Hillary not get the message here? The people do not want her; the machine cannot make her president without them. The people do not believe her; the media cannot canonize her without the people’s consent. The people are not happy with Hillary’s NeoCon politics; it’s time for her to retire.
Posted by: Emmanuel Winner | April 15, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
I am getting tired of Pennsylvanians against Obama still harping on the words bitter and frustrated. They try to pretend that they are not bigoted. Give me a break. I am 81 and a Pennsylvanian and I can assure you that bigotry is alive and kicking all over the state. There are usually two subjects worn out at every dinner, the price of gas and what if we get a black president? Oh, I forgot guns, everyone has several, cabinets filled with them because everyone hunts. There is a church on every corner, the people want God back n the schools, they refuse to believe they are descended from a monkey, and they hate the word liberal. Now, ask me he was being offensive. I think he was too polite. If we get Hilary, we will regret it forever and McCain is just the same old tired follow the course guy. We need Obama badly.
Posted by: Richard J. Palmer | April 15, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
I am voting for Obama and I understand why he said what he said. people are bitter and they arent happy with whats going on.. plus… the answer was perfect for the question that he was asked.
Posted by: Shea | April 15, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
The statemtents are elitist because
1) Obama didn’t empathize with the people he was talking about. He showed himself to be very different from himself and drew a contrast that came across as him being better or them being dumb, backwards – while he was smarter than they are to help with their problems.
2) He singled out working white people and came across as a ‘saviour’ and pandered to the elite group he was speaking with.
No matter how Obama supporters slice is – he was busted. Talking to one group about another group. Or basically saying – “look ya’ll, I’m trying to help these poor stupid red necks to get votes and this is what i’m gonna tell them, i need ya’ll to back me”…..
Posted by: nocity | April 15, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
The statemtents are elitist because
1) Obama didn’t empathize with the people he was talking about. He showed himself to be very different from [them] and drew a contrast that came across as him being better or them being dumb, backwards – while he was smarter than they are to help with their problems.
2) He singled out working white people and came across as a ‘saviour’ and pandered to the elite group he was speaking with.
No matter how Obama supporters slice is – he was busted. Talking to one group about another group. Or basically saying – “look ya’ll, I’m trying to help these poor stupid red necks to get votes and this is what i’m gonna tell them, i need ya’ll to back me”…..
Posted by: nocity | April 15, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
I am Bitter about Economy and War!!
I support OBAMA!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
You people are terrifying! That’s exactly how Hitler came to power — from people voting out of bitterness and a desire to raze the entire government to build something new, more hopeful, better — most of all, DIFFERENT.
Anyone who could vote for that man is ignorant, desperate and yes, bitter.
Posted by: horrified | April 15, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
This is ridiculous here we are borrowing money from China just to keep this country afloat, they’re buying up all the mortgage sub-prime loans, they’re feeding us poison foods and toys and half of your are losing your jobs. Every thing you buy in the stores is made somewhere else, and you continue to shop at walmart and send all your money to China. You don’t have a clue as to what is really going on in this country. You allow Bush, Cheney and company to f$$k you out of house, job, and you sit talking this BS when you should be looking at the factual issues and not all this crap that fed you by the media, that divides. That exactly what they want you to do, divide and conquer, it’s working very well isn’t it. Just look at what you are doing on this blog and million just like it. Get a clue before it’s to late and your sons and daughters are fighting McCain 100 year war.
Posted by: Kathryn Chatters | April 15, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
“They don’t vote on economic issues because they don’t expect anybody’s going to help them,” Obama said
NO. King of all Liberals Obama. We do not want a handout. We take prid ein earning our own living. We do not respect those who are capable, but are too lazy to earn a living. If we find a wallet we will return it to the owner and refuse a reward (against our own economic interest). The Obamas only give 1% to charity because it is in their best economic interest.
Posted by: geevill | April 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
It seems that every controuversy that comes up or every blip that Obama makes, it’s someone elses fault.
Or when he gets grilled, he spins it to make those who are critisizinghim seem like they are BAD people. As if he can’t be critiqued. It has worked very effectively. But for those who can see, it has not. And more people are getting the vision to see through him everyday.
I for one, am disgusted by him and his tricky camp. Hillary plays politics. Obama plays tricks. Word play. Games. Fear mongering. Race baiting. And blames it all on someone else.
Posted by: nocity | April 15, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Anyone who’s not frustrated, angry, and bitter hasn’t been paying attention. And btw, the Obamas gave 1% to charity because they were paying off their student loans. I vote for having a real person in the White House for a change.
Posted by: stonepier | April 15, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Anger is a healthy response. It shows that hope is still alive. People who have given up all hope are not bitter but resigned. They are sad but not angry. They are more apt to curl up into fetal position than to lash out.
The great pediatrician, D W Winnicott, wrote a lot about the fact that many difficult children are that way because of a hope of better. R. D Laing, also, wrote about the interaction between obedience in abused kids — they are devastated inside and see no reason to try to get more than the tiny pittance of love and attention they are given.
So, yes, Obama is right. Bitterness is a good sign as a start but needs action to heal itself. It needs hope. It needs someone who understand what it means and who won’t jack it up and glaze it over.
Posted by: Karen, New York | April 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
It isn’t the “clinging” to guns and religion that is the biggest issue (although that’s bad in and of itself). It’s that he implied that all regular Americans are bigots and racists because we are too stupid to see things his way. Those that wish to downplay this story are not helping themselves. It’s a HUGE story!
Posted by: Cory | April 15, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
al~
Stupidity is not a badge of honor, nor is fear mongering. Racism, well, that is the refuge of the ignorant.
Open your mind…
Yes YOU Can!
Posted by: ConfuciUS | April 15, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Bill W.~
Encouraged is original thought; here is the place and now is the time…
Yes YOU Can!
Posted by: ConfuciUS | April 15, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
For me, Hillary is a nonstarter, but I enjoy watching her battle it out with Obama.
Obama’s comments in San Fran were absurd. It’s astonishing that he truly sees nothing wrong with what he said, which in truth is how he feels.
Obama isn’t (at least yet) an economic elitist, but he IS an intellectual elitist. Further, he’s intelligent in a “books smart” sense, but he has little emotional intelligence and he certainly has little “street smarts.” He may have some insight into inner city difficulties, but he’s out of touch with the middle of the country.
What’s really funny is the excuse he offered to the Philadelphia Inquirer editorial board yesterday. He said that he “mangled his syntax.” What that means is that he’d use the same words but just put them in different order. How would that have helped?
Look, the guy got caught expressing his true feelings about people from small towns in the Midwest–they’re a bunch of narrow-minded pinheads. Right? I guess that feeds into any East Coast or West Coast stereotype. Now, what would be saying if McCain were caught on tape explaining to prospective donors why he’s making no headway with inner-city blacks as follows: “I can’t get through to these ignorant welfare recipients.”
In either case, they are stereotypes that shouldn’t be applied. Shame on Obama for “sticking to the truth.” All he’s doing is perpetuating a stereotype.
Posted by: Scott Meyer | April 15, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Faith, hope, and charity go hand in hand not hope and anger as Obama would have us believe. This small town, happy, church going, Pennsylvania gun owner knows that anger and hatred go hand in hand. And he graduated from Harvard?
Posted by: Hope Faith and Charity | April 15, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
stonepier:
“And btw, the Obamas gave 1% to charity because they were paying off their student loans.”
I want to see their loan repayment schedules. He was out of Harvard law school in 1993; she was out a lot earlier than that. My student loans had terms of only 10 years. So I’d expect her loans to have been paid long ago and his repaid in 2003. Still, those early year contributions are disgraceful. Walk the walk.
Posted by: Scott Meyer | April 15, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
nocity~
Required of Empathy: simple Understanding.
All is well, so Bush says; Crooked McCain agrees.
Happy are these wise rich fools; bitter the ignored, now demanding.
Empathy & Understanding are Obama’s tools; lost in all your hazy breeze.
Posted by: ConfuciUS | April 15, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Wow, the hyperbole is pretty incredible. So many Clinton supporters are stuck in the Denial stage of the 5 stages of grief. It is really amazing how vitriolic you all have become. I know some of you are republicans and have serious trouble with reality, so that I can understand.
Posted by: Jimbo62 | April 15, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
As a person with liberal humanitarian views of the world, conservative fiscal views on public funds, naturalist views on environment, and libertarian views regarding government interference in personal lives, I am a moderate Independent because no one party fits the bill.
I read an assertion today that at first I found stereotypical. The assertion was that liberals feel and conservatives think. While that may be true for the extreme liberals and conservatives, it is certainly not true for those like myself. I think extremists are the minority in this country but sometimes I wonder when I read the blog comments.
I will say that we can certainly apply the feel vs. think theory to the democratic candidates. In general, Obama appeals to the emotions of voters while Clinton appeals to the minds of voters. Each candidate tries to appeal to the other’s base as expected. So it is not surprising that where the candidates digress, Obama leans liberal in his voting record and Clinton leans conservative in her voting records.
What it seems to come down to is which of those we the voters find most important. If we like the one who appeals most to our emotions, we follow Obama. If we like the candidate with the greatest command of the issues, we follow Clinton. The polls completely support this assertion.
People talk about inspiration a lot in this campaign. While some find Obama inspirational, I find Clinton more inspirational because she speaks from the heart and not just words. (For the poster that said Obama doesnt use teleprompters you are mistaken. In fact, the experts have been critical of his faulty speeches and debate performances when he does not have them available.)
In any case, why do we need our President to inspire us? Do we hire the best mechanic, doctor, lawyer, accountant, etc. because they inspire us? I think most people hire the people we find most qualified for the money we can afford. If we were electing a class president, we might be looking for someone to inspire us to achieve our goals. But the role of the POTUS is nothing like a class president. In my view, we need a competent CEO/COO and CIC of the largest most complex organization in the world that is directly related to the security, stability, and welfare of the citizens of the USA. A class president does not impact any of these. An inspiring speaker alone is not qualified to be POTUS. The political climate of the world has changed placing the security of the nation among the top two issues we must realistically address. Economically, we have serious issues and we need a President with serious answers and a record of getting the job done for all Americans not just certain demographic sectors.
The voters in the democratic electorate hold different perspectives on what is most important in a candidate. This is a race for the nomination and we the voters should be considering all of the attributes of each candidate. Let’s allow the remaining voters to do just that and stop all the personal attacks based on misogynist and racists views.
What we see happening was engineered by the RNC via Karl Rove’s expert manipulation in his advice to Obama on how to beat Clinton and the RNC manipulation of the voters through the media pushing them to vote with their emotions prompting Identity splits. In that sense, the RNC is making the assertion a reality – in their view, liberals (democrats) are voting with their hearts and conservatives (repubicans) are voting with their heads.
Usually voters do vote with their hearts in the primary season and their heads in the election season. This is part of the reason democrats lose most general elections for President – they tend to select a nominee that is not competent to be POTUS.
Former President Bill Clinton has the ability to reach out and touch the voters but ran on a platform based on the issues and was successful because he had the experience and record of getting the job done. Senator Clinton also took the time to establish her own experience and record of getting things done. She reaches out to voters in a different way but still runs on a platform based on the issues. The polls continue to maintain the voters believe she is the most comptent on the issues. Unfortunately, half the democratic electorate thinks that emotional inspiration is more important which is exactly what the RNC wants. If you truly want change, the only way that can happen is by electing a democrat to the White House and more democrats into Congress. Falling victim to the RNC ploys will not make that happen. For all the voters who have not yet voted in the primary, please consider all of the attributes of the candidates and dont just vote based on emotions.
Posted by: DCVoter | April 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Do you really want Obama defending our country when he or his family or friends have not defended us yet?
Posted by: virginia | April 15, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
You know, he [Bush] wants to divide us over race. I’m from the South. I understand this. This quota deal they’re gonna pull in the next election is the same old scam they’ve been pulling on us for decade after decade after decade. When their economic policies fail, when the country’s coming apart rather than coming together, what do they do? They THESE ARE BILL CLINTON’S WORD’S IN 1992
find the most economically insecure white men and scare the living daylights out of them. They know if they can keep us looking at each other across a racial divide, if I can look at Bobby Rush and think, Bobby wants my job, my promotion, then neither of us can look at George Bush and say, ‘What happened to everybody’s job? What happened to everybody’s income? What … have … you … done … to … our … country?’”
Posted by: william | April 15, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Well from the looks of things this too has been a none starter for Clinton.
I doesn’t look as if it has made any impact in the polls, which of course still remain all over the place, only thing that can be said is that Obama has cut into Clinton’s lead in PA and IN.
I noticed that the Clintons have dropped the subject today.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | April 15, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm