By Saira Anees

Apr 3, 2008 9:29am

Obama is Smokin’

Last August, I ran into Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, outside the Senate chamber in the Capitol.

This was before the Obama surge, before he had omnipresent Secret Service agents, back when you might see him strolling solo.

We chatted for a second, mainly about the Pakistan speech he’d recently given and about how the media had covered it. He was in good spirits.

As any close friend or family member can attest, I have an unusually keen sense of smell and immediately I smelled cigarette smoke on Obama. Frankly, he reeked of cigarettes.

Obama ran off before I could ask him if he’d just snuck a smoke, so I called his campaign.

They denied it. He’d quit months before, in February,  they insisted. He chewed nicorette.

But I knew what I’d smelled and I asked his campaign to double-check and to ask him if he’d had a cigarette.

They reported back that he had told them he hadn’t had a cigarette since he quit.

And maybe that was true. Maybe I imagined the cigarette smoke. My olfactory nerve somehow misfired.

Except….last night on MSNBC’s Hardball, Obama admitted that his attempt to wean himself from the vile tobacco weed had not been entirely successful.

“I fell off the wagon a couple times during the course of it, and then was able to get back on," he said. "But it is a struggle like everything else.”

Now I wonder about last August.

It’s not a big deal in the scheme of things — the war on Iraq, a major economic crisis — indeed, it’s miniscule. Hardly worth mentioning.

Except that I don’t like feeling that I wasn’t being dealt with honestly. And as much as citizens who are suspect of the media might scoff at such a notion, many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we as a nation are confident is the right one. (Corny, I know.)

This isn’t the only time I’ve felt that way about the Obama campaign, of course — its response to the Austan Goolsbee controversy was a profile in dissembling. (Not that Sens. Hillary Clinton and John McCain or their campaigns are entirely innocent in this area either. Or even that Obama is necessarily the worst offender.)

Still.

- jpt

UPDATE: To clear up any confusion as to who the "we" was in the second to last graph, I clarified — "we as nation."

User Comments

The Clinton’s has run a dirty “no holds barred” campaign, and unprofessional.
The Democratic Party delegates are starting to Unite behind Obama!

Posted by: Lookup | April 3, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

You really get the impression that Obama says whatever he thinks will work at the moment. Witness all his dissembilng over the Rev. Wright issue. Trust your instincts, Jake!

Posted by: Vnd | April 3, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

I think the fact that he admited it on national television last night shows his honesty.
Maybe his campaign said something different, but all campaigns are like that.

Posted by: Brian | April 3, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

For those who smoke and try to quit really understand that. I have bets going with my husband that i could quit. i tried really hard about the third week i went out back and lit one .
and then chastised myself that i would not do it again. i did not tell him right away .needless to say i got caught and lost the bet. quitting smoking is very and i mean very hard . the longest i have been able to stay smoke free was 34 days. so i get it.

Posted by: Lauren | April 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

What suprises me is that nobody commented on John McCain smoking in his first recent campaign ad, where you see him talking as POW, stretched on a bed, and filling the screen with the smoke of his cigarette. Check that ad out to see it for yourself.
For a guy still going pretty strong at his age, that is a tobacco and nicotine ad like no other! Very convincing!
Smoke, and you’ll survive Vietnam! Smoke, and you’ll be running for President at the age of 71!
Haha.

Posted by: Greta | April 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

So does this fall into the category of speculation? Not necessarily reporting but just making sure something bad about Obama has to be on these blogs? It’s laughable really.. Perhaps it wasn’t cigarette smoke you smelled but the smell of sniper fire in Bosnia ( proved) or the smell of Al Quaeda in Iran ( also proved)-although I do note your disclaimer at the end of your speculative argument against Obama that you think the other 2 are liars too but you had to go after Obama since there hasn’t been too much to speculate on lately…

Posted by: whatever | April 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

I don’t blame him for falling off the wagon with all the sniper fire and going on.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 3, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

its not like he is saying his experience for being President is based on his smoking. He was honest yesterday on Chris Mathews Hardball .
Unlike other candidates dont admit to their erros.

Posted by: Lauren | April 3, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

“– its response to the Austan Goolsbee controversy was a profile in dissembling. (Not that Sens. Hillary Clinton and John McCain or their campaigns are entirely innocent in this area either. Or even that Obama is necessarily the worst offender.)”
I might have missed something, so not sure what you meant about Clinton and McCain, my impression is Clinton’s campaign has never contacted the Canadians for that NAFTA issue, it was finally and firmly verified by the Canada government.

Posted by: Victor | April 3, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Sen. Barak Obama was a long time heavy smoker. Jake, I am so glad you brought up the subject. I think he gave it up since he had to clean up his act before he could run for the democratic nominee. Having been a long time smoker, Sen. Obama must have lungs of an very old man! And you know how ex-smokers are they keep going back and fourth…only few are able to give up smoking for good. If he’s elected Sen. Obama carries a health risk greater than of Sen. McCain’s age facter.

Posted by: charleschaplin | April 3, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

It must be a slow news day ?

Posted by: Lauren | April 3, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

btw Jake
did I read that right, that the Clinton is “not entirely innocent either” when it comes to “being dealt with honestly”?!?!
I think you “misspoke” there, or you weren’t able to concentrate because of all the sniper fire.
BTW. All our great war heroes were smokers, including – as I reported – John McCain. It is America’s hysteria on the cigarette that explains Obama’s behavior, which doesn’t tell us anything else. Why should he confess a small personal sin to YOU?

Posted by: Greta | April 3, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

But, what was he smokin’?

Posted by: Jayhawk | April 3, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

This post is random and stupid… Remember Bush hasn’t had a drink since 1986…

Posted by: hope2008 | April 3, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Oh Please!

Posted by: Thinking | April 3, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Hillary Clinton’s “Red Phone” SNL scenarios with panicking and chain smoking Barak Obama– we think as comedy. But those SNL skits are like the closest we come to discovering the truth about Barak Obama’s real experience. The point is not the fact that Barak was a long time smoker; and we don’t know the consequences he has to face as a result, even if he lives in the White House, but the fact those skits were effective; stated as comedy, when there’s a real prohibition in the media about saying anything positive about Hillary Clinton and anything negative about Barak Obama. Anyway, those skits were convincing and it felt like closest to the truth, while all what we see in the newscasts about Sen. Obama seemed hyped up and made up by the adoring media.

Posted by: charleschaplin | April 3, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Gossips. Nothing major to report today ?

Posted by: Freeman | April 3, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Smoking is a nervous addiction. He is a nervous man off camera.
Regardless of his personal habits, Obama’s problems are a scarcity of ideas and talent. It isn’t hard to take a charismatic guy, load his speeches with all the usual hooks the young and the desperate respond to, and create A Movement.
Movement’s don’t create legislation and govern. Where Obama is being perceived on the ground as thin is ideas about how to fix the crises of the economy and national security. He and his simply don’t know much about those topics, much less have the depth to see where the new ideas might come from.
Scarcity favors the ingenious. Obama is a fine speaker but so was George C. Wallace.

Posted by: len | April 3, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Smoking? Yes, someone can quit. Obama has access to all the resources needed to quit. Role model for kids? Smoking kills. Everyone went crazy when Bill had sex in the white house. Which is a worse role model? Smoking KILLS!!! Not just the smoker, but those around him. Also shows Obama’s lack of willpower and ability to use resources. Poor Obama!

Posted by: al | April 3, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Do not elect OBAMA just because you want to show the world that America is ready for a Minority president. Make sure if he has enough credentials.
Btw – I personally believe, Obama needs to stay in Senate for the next 4 years and prove to the people that he is really good.

Posted by: GS | April 3, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Many more physical and spiritual weaknesses will undoubtedly be unearthed about Barack Obama as the process continues.
Who cares?
What matters is whether or not a candidate can win the electoral college in November.
Obama cannot, and he probably won’t get the chance to try.
History does repeat itself.
Consider the 1968 Democratic convention and the chosen candidate who did not campaign.
Now, what prominent Democrat has not campaigned and has the real qualifications and experience to be President?
Can you say Al Gore?

Posted by: Jayhawk | April 3, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

People quit smoking all the time, for good. There are many resources available today to do so.
When youth see Obama smoking they will say, well if it is ok for our Savior, it is ok for us.
Horrible role model for kids!
Lack of willpower, ability to use resources on Obama’s part. Tells us something about him.
Oh, and he lies. All the time.

Posted by: al | April 3, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

“It isn’t hard to take a charismatic guy, load his speeches with all the usual hooks the young and the desperate respond to, and create A Movement.”
Not in a fantasy novel, no, but nobody ever ran a overwhelmingly impressive presidential campaign on that scenario in the USA, you silly. Get real. You underestimate many millions of Americans, among then many of our prominent figures in politics, science and the economy.
And it’s easy, you mean, to beat the Clinton Machine? Then the Clintons aren’t worth a penny after all.

Posted by: ken | April 3, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

I don’t care whether Obama smokes, but I think his penchant for presenting himself as something he is not will come back to haunt him in the general if he gets the nomination. Smoking is the least of his problems. Even Goolsbee on NAFTA and Power on Iraq and his “I don’t take money from oil companies” slight of hand pale in comaprison to his fundamental problem. He has come this far in a Trojan horse. He constructed this artiface–painted himself as the one who could lead us to transcend partisan and racial divides. Despite the hype, he has demonstrated no capacity to do this. Rather, as the Senate’s most liberal member (with a tendency to overstate his role and accomplishments) and someone who chose Jeremiah Wright as his spiritual guide, he has and will continue to inflame partisan and racial divides.
The disconnect between his rhetoric and his record is staggering!

Posted by: NancyJ | April 3, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

As to a candidate for the most important office in the world, the smoking question raised by Jake Tapper is appropriately pertinent to:
1. His crediibility. He has flip-flopped on whether he does or does not.
2. His judgment. Anyone who smokes in this 21st century, what with all the knowledge and proof we now have about smoking’s dire effects on health, has arguably SUSPECT common sense!

Posted by: Frank Loomis | April 3, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Your title had me thinking at first this would be another article on how obama was speeding (smokin’) past all his competition. No candidate is perfect just like no media outlet/reporter/journalist. You do a good job of keeping all three of the candidates’ supporters equally upset and happy at times and that’s got to be a good thing for everyone.

Posted by: abe | April 3, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

You could tell by looking at his lips and teeth, when he smiles that he’s still a smoker! He used to smoke very heavily for a long time. But he gave up drug habits, although his campaign tell you that he given up smoking, just by looking at his lips, mouth and teeth you could tell he’s been indulging in tobacco. You know having a family history of cancer; this is really playing with fire. I am so surprised you folks in the adoring press didn’t notice? The media let Sen. Obama get away with murder. I see a big element of self-destruction in Sen. Obama in spite all the charm and his popularity.
So now we know, since it has come in the open, something that few people knew; like in the SNL skit where he was chain smoking; I know it wasn’t a joke! Sen. Barak Obama should set a better example for rest us us we know all his talk about change is all nonsense. Sen. Barak Obama was made by the same cookie-cutter that was used by David Axelrod to make Gov. Duval Patrick of Massachusetts. CHANGE and HOPE were the same slogans that Duval Patrick used; and there’s nothing new in Barak Obama’s campaign. All the stuff about hope and change were re-cycled and reconstituted by political fixes from Chicago David Axelrod and David Plouff for the manipulation of American voters! We know Sen. Obama even used Duval Patrick’s speeches─ lifting them word for word! If you really want to find out what’s happening with “CHANGE” lately, you should look in to what’s going on with Barak Obama’s carbon-copy Duval Patrick and how he’s doing in Massachusetts! As a smoker Sen. Obama carries a huge health risk to the White House. A another tragedy in the making? Have we not had enough? Can we really take these kinds of risks with charming but unknown person?
That’s why, Jake Sen. Hillary Clinton is still our best hope for our country!

Posted by: charleschaplin | April 3, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

My guess is that Obama needs nicotine (cigarettes or gum) to help him combat low energy, forgetfulness or spaciness.
It’s the reason a lot of people I know turn to it. Obama’s very intelligent but I think that, like George Bush, his capabilities might crack under the pressure over time. Hillary Clinton has actually gotten better with age, she’s got a sharp quality to her intelligence and is fully present.

Posted by: Vnd | April 3, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Come on, really ? This is absolutely ridiculous. Maybe he came from a bar where other people were smoking? Or a meeting with someone who was smoking? Or maybe he did smoke, but WHO CARES? Hardly something that reflects on the honesty or not of a campaign.

Posted by: Dem | April 3, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

I agree with Vnd- Obama will say what he thinks will work at the moment to get himself out of his messy lies. This man is NOT trustworthy. And all this bs about “bringing everyone together” has actually done the opposite. Blacks and whites are more divided now than when Obama came on the scene. That is the truth.

Posted by: John | April 3, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

@al and the rest of you holier than thou judgemental “perfect” people
I don’t think it is spaciness ( as you say)that is the ultimate reason to smoke, I think it is dealing with people like you.
I think all you anti smokers should start- maybe it would help you calm down a little and take the edge off of your nastiness. I would pick Obama over Clinton as a role model for my kids any day Cigarette-gate vs. Watergate

Posted by: whatever | April 3, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

John is absolutely right. Blacks and whites are more divided now than when Obama came on the scene — he’s the great divider. He can’t have sat in that church for 20 years and not absorbed something, not absorbed the doctrine that it’s black vs. white.

Posted by: Vnd | April 3, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Obama is like any other human being. Campaigning every day, receiving attacks from all directions, media attacks, a prolonged campaign which was not anticipated, being away from the family. All these contributes to one to be nervous.
He needs a cigarette a day to calm him down. Am sure once the pressure is over, he will make it without thinking of it.

Posted by: Peace | April 3, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

To “whatever”: You misunderstand. I don’t want Obama for my president but I do have some empathy for him. If he found out at some point in his life that nicotine helps motivate him, helps moves him from day to day, then it’s really hard to give that up. I wouldn’t be surprised if he keeps chewing the gum the rest of his life — but just be honest about it.

Posted by: Vnd | April 3, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

My lord. Imasmoker…want to know how many times I’ve quit? Too many to count. Did my family members know everytime I fell off the wagon…no. If they asked and I didnt want to say, I’d ignore the quest. or say “yeah, yeah I quit”.
That does not mean when at my job I lie, am incapable of doing my job appropriately, or that Im incompatant.
All it means is “Stop being so darn nosey about whether or not Im still smoking”. It’s legal and a bad guilty pleasure and frankly nobody’s business!
Not to mention, that how many people smoke? How many have tried to quiit and havent been successful? How many finally were able to quit? And doesnt it make u feel a little better knowing that a Pres. candidate at least can sympothise with the difficultyof quitting smoking? It’s called Empathy..which a Pres. should have.

Posted by: Michelle | April 3, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

This is very disturbing. He is relapsing with nicotine. What’s next -back to being a “pothead”? back to “blow”? He snapped at the guy trying to get a picture. He is supposed to be the winner, but is already cracking with little to stress about.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

I didnt start smoking because a Pres. did. I started smoking because my FATHER DID. And most of my friends started due to a parent smoking. Not because media glamorizes it or because the PRes. hopefull started, then quit, then started then quit again.
Get real people….most people start smoking because they get taught it’s ok by a PARENT or guardian or some other family member. I highly doubt some 12 yr old kid sees Obama, knows his a smoker and is gunna light up. My guess is the 12 yr old will light up because a parent smokes, sibling, smokes teacher smokes…etc.

Posted by: Michelle | April 3, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Conservatives would like him more if he had two DUIs like the president.

Posted by: matt! | April 3, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

geevil,
just so you know, the reason he “snapped” at the guy trying to get the photo is because the guy and his “photographer” had been following him to several events, including disrupting his meeting with a group of 3rd graders to get the photo. The guy sells Obama stuff on ebay and was trying to get a photo with Obama to show that he is “legitimate.” trust me, in my former job, I had to work with celebrities and these “photograph” folks are just ruthless.

Posted by: BNA | April 3, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Now we must worry that Obama will fall back to his drug use which hasn’t been vetted. And if this guy was some kind of stalker the Secret Service would of hauled him away look ago. He was a rude jerk, but Obama handled it poorly.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Now we must worry that Obama will fall back to his drug use which hasn’t been vetted. And if this guy was some kind of stalker the Secret Service would of hauled him away long ago. He was a rude jerk, but Obama handled it poorly.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Do you know how hard it is to quit smoking. It takes a lot more than will power. Nicotine is out of your system within 72 hours but the psychological aspects are the hardest to get through. Unless you’ve quit smoking you have no idea what you’re talking about

Posted by: maryland | April 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Hello!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a cigarette we are talking about. We’ve had Presidents lie about affairs and covering up crimes and you focus on the fact that a candidate smelled like a cigarette???
The media really need to get a clue.

Posted by:   | April 3, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

I remember when Bob Dole got hammered because he said nicotine was not addictive. I don’t smoke, but I don’t doubt it is. But Obama has admitted to an extensive past use of drugs and alcohol. Also addictive. The issue is not his smoking, but his personality and ability to cope with stress.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Out on my smoke break …what riveting Smoker Bashing did I miss? Oh thank you Amazon Traveler for giving me yet another reason to dislike Hillary… smoke free White House oh yippee I wonder if that was included in her “years of experience” as first lady. I will again state SMOKING IS LEGAL, it is something that we as FREE Americans can do ( for now, until they take that freedom away and then watch out!!! for here comes Prohibition and we all know how well that worked out)it’s about as stupid as someone giving me a ticket for not wearing my seatbelt( I’m sorry , yes government you do know best oh thank you for saving me from myself).

Posted by: whatever | April 3, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

If Obama can’t quit cigarettes perhaps he is unable to quit pot or blow or booze too. THAT is the newsworthy point of the blog.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

geevil,
these sort of people are not the traditional “stalkers”, just big jerks with the same mentality of paparazzi. the secret service did push him away when obama first went into the store, but Obama tried to talk to him and explain to him why he didn’t want to do the photo and the guy just kept on pushing on. this is exactly what they do. i’m telling ya, i’ve seen it a hundred times. and you just can’t shake these guys. if the secret service would have really dealt with this guy, then it would caused a bigger disturbance. there’s no talking logic with these guys. it’s all about selling stuff for top dollar, at any cost.

Posted by: BNA | April 3, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

It’s not about the smoking it’s about the lying. Deny, deny until there is too much evidence then you admit the truth. Nothing different, same as the rest, just with no experience.

Posted by: Firefighter | April 3, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Ok then, the jerk incident was blown out of proportion. I take that part back. My wfie told me Obama was a smoker due to his lips. The problem is that we were told he quit.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

I knew there would be an article about this today as soon as Obama admitted to falling off the wagon. I’m a smoker and it’s a hard habit to break. I’m sure this is someone who just went cold turkey but for some it’s a up and down process…..

Posted by: Stacey | April 3, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

If I had to spend my day meeting the press and pressing the meat, I’d want to light up every so often too.
Convenient that the press corpse has resurrected its curiosity just in time for a Democratic presidency. Imagine what could have been done if they’d investigated Bush’s DUI, coke habits, DOJ corruption, and close attention to PDBs. Oh, and the Iraq thing.

Posted by: Brian | April 3, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

I don’t see an issue–if Obama did fall off the cigarette wagon, would he tell his campaign spokesman? Seriously, is he required to? At worst, the fault lies in the spokesman who should have said “As far as we know, he’s not smoking”.
If you’re going to question the campaign’s honesty, then do it in an honest way!

Posted by: Vaughan | April 3, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

My own mother denied for about 10 years to my dad that she was sneaking cigarettes when he thought she had quit many years earlier. That’s the nature of the addiction. She finally confessed to him when they both were talking with her doctor the day the doctor told her shey had stage 4 lung cancer. It’s hard to quit smoking. I’m an ex-smoker, too so I know first hand. Give Obama a break Mr. Truth-Seeking journalist.

Posted by: Patrick | April 3, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Have you ever known a single person that quits smoking to escape weight gain?
Yet Obama told a PA newspaper who asked him if he was having trouble mananging his weight with all the bad food on the campaign trail that actually he had lost 5 or 6 pounds. Not smoking and losing weight? He should be in Ripley’s Believe it or not musuem.

Posted by: Karen | April 3, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

What an idiot. I haven’t smoked in 20 years, but when I went into a tavern to get bookwork from the owner, one of my accounting clients, I reeked for the rest of the day. My eyes watered, and I sneezed. It gets in your hair and soaks into your clothes. Of course, now In Washington state, that’s all a thing of the past, thank God.
My point being, you don’t have to smoke to smell like you do. Just be around smokers for any length of time.

Posted by: MizLiz | April 3, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

As a smoker, I affirm that quitting smoking is one of the hardst personal – and private – challenges to face, and it is typical of those jumping on and off “the wagon” to downplay the slips, even among their closest friends and family (we all want to pretend that’s an easy matter of will, after all – and it’s not). This has nothing to do with politics, and has no thing to do with the excellence of Obama’s future and inevitable presidency. (If it were Clinton, she’d add a few snipers to the narrative, and John McCain would blow up and start chain-smoking out of spite.)

Posted by: Emmanuel Winner | April 3, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Last post on this for me…
Even though it’s not anyone’s business about Obama’s smoking in my opinion… I mean come on, is anyone concerned about McCain’s new bandage on his face? And somehow his doctors are “not available” to answer questions about his health until May (hello? the guy is running for president and his doctors are not available?)? Maybe health care accessibility also sucks for men of such power…
In any event, Obama clearly said on Chris Matthews last night that he has fallen off the wagon a few times. What more do you want the guy to say? Sheesh…
Yep, this is what the country needs to be worried about as we slide into a nasty recession and our troops are dying for nothing.

Posted by: BNA | April 3, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

HERE IS THE BIG DEAL.
In his memoir, Dreams From My Father, published 10 years ago, Obama, 46, freely admitted to smoking marijuana and makes an oblique reference to hard drugs.
“I blew a few smoke rings, remembering those years,” he wrote. “Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though.” “Blow” is street slang for cocaine, “smack” is heroin.
In the book, Obama recalls that he had “been headed” to the status of “junkie” or “pothead”, which he describes as “the final, fatal role of the young would-be black man”. He recalls smoking “reefer” in the backs of his friends’ vans, dorm rooms and “on the beach with a couple of Hawaiian kids who had dropped out of school”.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Obama has many problems that is why he won’t be our next president he can’t take it and where is all the change just like he can’t quit smoking he can’t stay away from all the old WHITE guys in the party the AA will find out that it does not matter who is in the white house it never trickles down nothing will change Obama is juat another man who has been rasied in a white world he panders to everyone gore for global warminng why would an x vice president want to be in his Amin. there are also workin places that will fire you if you smoke he has been talked into this and it shows he just wan’t's to be left alone. The repubs will have a hey day with him

Posted by: Bishop | April 3, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

What a waste of time…..writing a story about someone who months ago may/may not have had a cigarette…and may/may not have tried to cover it up. What happened to doing the “news.” The press is lame.

Posted by: p | April 3, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Obama the Embarrassed is unfit to lead our nation because he had a lapse while trying to quit smoking. Clinton the Delusional is unfit to lead our nation because she can’t tell whether she was under sniper fire or being greeted by a young girl on the tarmac. McCain the Incompetent is unfit to lead our nation because he can’t tell the difference between Iran and Al Qaeda. I’ll take my chances with Obama.

Posted by: LK | April 3, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

“It’s not a big deal in the scheme of things — the war on Iraq, a major economic crisis — indeed, it’s miniscule. Hardly worth mentioning.”
You should have ended this piece right there.

Posted by: LESD | April 3, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

This’s soooo obama. He says one thing and does another..I can’t wait to see the faces of messiah’s supporters when the results in the general come in. (if he’s the nominee)
Everybody else knows that caucus-winner Obama doesn’t stand a chance against warhero Mccain. I’ve always voted democrat, but this fall it’s Mccain.

Posted by: Missmadeleine2002 | April 3, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

SO WHAT? why are you wasting my time, Jake?

Posted by: maria | April 3, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Did any one notice that all the Obama supporters are like little kids this is about Obama but they are well she did this they always want to blame it on Hillary . When he losees this it will be because of his lies any there are many.

Posted by: Bishop | April 3, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

“It’s ridiculous how bent out of shape supporters get when the slightest negative thing is said about Obama.”
Indeed those Obama supports’ mad posts make me laugh :) Jake was just expressing a feeling that Obama campaign might even have tried to cover this small thing which is not a big deal. Just a few words about a quick thought, take it easy men :)

Posted by: Victor | April 3, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

This is so silly on so many levels. Jake didn’t ask Obama if he smoked only that he smelled smoke – could be from Obama or someone around Obama, or Jake could be wrong. Also, the person that you asked may not even have spoken to Obama and gave whatever answer he thought was accurate. All we know is that Obama WAS HONEST with Chris Matthews.
Then, makes the assumption that he is right and goes on a diatribe about Obama’s honesty. Sheesh.
I guess this is what passes for journalism these days.
Meanwhile Clinton lies about Bosnia, lies about her role in the FMLA, lies about opening borders in Macedonia etc…

Posted by: Vik N | April 3, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

So I guess we expect that if Obama sneaked a smoke in February, he should have called his campagaign headquarters to alert them?
Good Lord….

Posted by: Jeff | April 3, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

We have a president who was a hard core alcoholic for more than twenty years and now appears to have suffered some brain damage as a result. Before that, we had a president who was a hard core sex addict which got him into all kinds of trouble. If Obama’s worst vice is the need to smoke a cigarette every now and then, thank goodness for that.

Posted by: Loretta | April 3, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

If only the media could be so dilligent in their examination of the truth of statements relating to war and the economy… Hey how about one story, just one, examining in detail the effects of the surge. Is it the troop increase that helped decrease violance, was it petreus’ reorgainzation of resources, was it the sunni awakening or was a little bit of all of the above. U can do it, I believe in U media.

Posted by: john g | April 3, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Little kids is right because there obviously a lack of comprehension of the underlying point of this posting: he doesn’t like the *feeling* that he was lied to.
He didn’t say that he was indeed lied to, but is having a hard time reconciling what he perceived to be the truth, what he was told and what the Obama camp said on Hardball.
Tapper also is making the observation that this perhaps is not an isolated incident, but a pattern in HIS experiences with the Obama campaign.
This posting is not about smoking at all folks, but opens up a dialog about sincerity and integrity and he’s been equally hard on the other candidates in these areas as well.

Posted by: LOM | April 3, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

“Not in a fantasy novel, no, but nobody ever ran a overwhelmingly impressive presidential campaign on that scenario in the USA, you silly.”
Silly? It worked for Bush. It worked for Reagan. It worked for George C. Wallace. It worked for JFK. It worked for FDR.
In fact, it is the easiest way to beat a political machine because
a) The candidate doesn’t have to confront issues.
b) The candidate can lie and cover it in rhetoric.
c) The candidate can spend lots of money but never actually say anything of substance.
d) The candidate can run on having no experience (aka, the ‘outsider’ argument).
It’s the virtue of cute and naive that Hollywood uses with ingenues.
The blank slate works very well as long as it is heavily financed and there are no scandals that make the electorate question the candidates character and judgement.
Oopsie….
It works best in primaries. It is much much harder to work in the general election. At that point, the candidate has to turn to the politics of personal destruction of their opponent. Then it is like a caucus: a screamfest where the strongest screamers win. The problem of using that tactic too early is the electorate is fatigued of it by the time the real voting process starts in the fall.
Oopsie…

Posted by: len | April 3, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Pretty pathetic ‘reporting’ really…I, for one, would love to see Obama kick the habit but this is newsworthy?
Sounds like a witch hunt to try and unearth ‘something’ to take a shot at Obama.
Just another in a long line of reminders on how the media is doing such a ‘great’ job in covering ‘news’.

Posted by: Anthony | April 3, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Mr. tapper, why don’t you expose mccain for breaking the campaign finance laws? Why don’t you question all of the lies from bush, cheney, rumsfeld, and all of the lies from mccain? Why don’t you expose mccain for not supporting the GI bill? Smoking????? is that illegal? did you get your feelings hurt. how ridiculously inane.

Posted by: linda | April 3, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Weren’t being dealt with honestly??? Even if he did smell like smoke, did he somehow owe it to you to bring it up himself and explain it?
This is beyond shallow.

Posted by: Adam | April 3, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Wow, you should be really embarrassed about reporting trivial crap like this being “ABC News’ Senior National Correspondent based in the network’s Washington bureau”. With the quagmire in Iraq and an economy in the toilet and John McCain getting a pass in the media for running on a 3rd Bush term, I can see why you would do an investigative report from August 2007 on whether Obama snuck a cigarette while trying to quit . It is particularly relevant now in April 2008! People like you have turned the media into nothing more than the National Inquirer on a daily basis. You are proof that we can no longer count on the media to inform us!

Posted by: Kathy from MO | April 3, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

First of all, who do you think YOU are that Obama is obligated to tell you about his personal business? Whether or not he smoked that doesn’t make it any of your freaking business whatsoever. That is the arrogance of the media these days, they think that just because they ask that he is obligated to tell.
And to bring up a situation that happened in AUGUST of 2007 is flat out ridiculous. This POINTLESS and it is getting ridiculous. Why don’t you report on something that actually affects the people of this country? Get a life!

Posted by: UCLAdy04 | April 3, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Gotta agree with the people who don’t really think this is too important. Please stick to bigger issues!

Posted by: drill | April 3, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

OH MY GOD, how DARE you say report something bad about Obama. No wonder all these Obama cult members are attacking you.
Obama has weak nerves already—not a good sign of a good leader.

Posted by: john | April 3, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

wow. I’ll give you Goolsbee and NAFTA, or Powers and Iraq – Obama’s positions are a little too convenient and his advisors are out making more intelligent cases and getting him in trouble for it.
But this smoking thing is absurd. Hopefully the primaries end soon so we can start actually talking about real issues.

Posted by: SC | April 3, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

ONION worthy.

Posted by: dave | April 3, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

As anyone who has ever quit smoking can attest, you NEVER say you had one when you’re trying to quit because it opens the door for ANOTHER.
You want everyone to believe you’ve quit because it keeps you on track.

Posted by: Shelley Mansberger | April 3, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

My gosh, why don’t you report the truth that John McCain is a “campaign finance criminal. The Washington Post reported on the potential for criminal behavior by McCain:
Knowingly violating the spending limit is a criminal offense that could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and up to five years in prison.
Now, based on McCain’s latest campaign finance report, we know the GOP nominee has violated the spending limit. So, it’s time to take it to the next level.
The hypocrisy of the so-called “maverick” violating a law which he championed because it suits his purposes this time around is horrifying. Even worse is the relative silence of the press on this, given the rank hypocrisy of violations of McCain’s “signature” issue and all. Does it get to be your signature issue if you are blatantly violating it in an in-your-face maneuver after being warned not to by the head of the FEC? I think not.
You, Mr Tapper, are no journalist.
For shame…

Posted by: helen | April 3, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Obama admitted on Hardball yesterday to slipping once or twice. He beat you to your “gotcha”.

Posted by: MikeB | April 3, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

If this were Hillary Clinton it would be the lead story on CNN and MSNBC. I can just see it, Hillary caught in another “misspeak”. Does Obama walk on water as well:?

Posted by: Elena | April 3, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Let’s see, last august. Thats one… two… three… four… five… six… seven… eight… nine… NINE months ago? First of all, how in the world can nine months ago warrant the present tense in the title “Obama is Smokin”? Second, lets count how many American soldiers died in Iraq since then… 274, not including the 84 in August of that year. Now, this is relevant why?

Posted by: Concorde | April 3, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

WHO CARES?

Posted by: Carl | April 3, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

No story on Hillary Clinton getting FIRED from the Watergate Impeachment…BUT Obama MIGHT have been smoking? PLEASE!

Posted by: Carl | April 3, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

When I heard that this educated, middle class ’40 something’ man was a smoker, I couldn’t believe it. Where was Obama during the 70′s and 80′s when cigarettes had virtually been scrubbed from all media – magazines, t.v., movies. Anti smoking campaigns were also in full force. More importantly, the health risks had been pounded into us from the mid-sixties and every package even back then contained “that warning”.
One of the first magazine pieces I remember following Obama’s presidential announcement was this “puff piece” about Michelle Obama’s annoyance with her husband’s nicotine habit – she made him sound so human. Well, I don’t know too many educated middle class ’40 something people who smoke.
Sadly, cigarettes have been making their way back into the media in the past 10 years. There are new groups of teen smokers out there now, but what’s Obama’s excuse?
Was it not being comfortable in his own skin that he had to adopt a “persona” or is it just his arrogance that the health problems associated with smoking won’t impact him or his family?

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

I don’t like man who don’t smoke.

Posted by: valentina | April 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Are we supposed to take this post seriously? When Obama lies about something that really matters, something that affects the *public* trust, not something that merely *infects* your investigative reporter’s mind, then I’d be interested. Otherwise, just give us a break from this nonsense, please.

Posted by: Gwen-elle | April 3, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I find these comments hilarious. You are denigrating Jake over a single post, claiming that you’re going to “go back to NBC.”
When he does post, let’s say, something much more newsworthy, you’re reaction has paled in comparison. You’re prepared to reject and denounce Jake over this but continue to support a man who chose to place the controversial Rev. Wright on one of his campaign committees? Many of you have a warped sense of judgment.

Posted by: LOM | April 3, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

You can’t be serious? Have you nothing better to do than post about this idiotic speculation whether Sen.Obama did or did not smoke on the particular day you ran into him? Gee, your feelings are hurt you may have been misled? Cut me a break. A total non-story.
I cannot believe there are people just itching to dump anything on Sen. Obama, a truly once in a lifetime candidate for president. Nothing sticks because he is a man of character unlike his female rival.

Posted by: ceci | April 3, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Are you his priest? Get over it.

Posted by: Tia | April 3, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

I used to think there was nothing less relevant to the real issues facing our nation than whether or not the President got oral sex from another consenting adult. Now I know there are even more ridiculous distractions.
To avoid future confusion, please don’t waste our time and attention on whether a politician lied about (a) still smoking, (b) extramarital sex, (c) having a same-sex incident while a teenager, (d) smoking pot in college, (d) cheating on a test in high school (college counts, though), (e) using a line from another politician’s speech, with that politician’s consent. Or anything else that could lead people to vote for the wrong damn reasons.

Posted by: Thersites D. Scott | April 3, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

How can you base an article on “I think Obama lied to me about smoking”? Smelling cigarette smoke on a person doesn’t count. You have to have actually seen him smoking the cigarette in order for you to have caught Obama in a lie about smoking. Otherwise you don’t have what journalists like to call “proof”. I can’t wait to read more of your “I think [Someone did something]” articles.

Posted by: K. Linehan | April 3, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Gee Jake, it’s not quite the “I dated Monica Lewinski too” headline grabber that launched your career, but I do appreciate your nose for a good story.

Posted by: jane | April 3, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Seriously, if this was a story about Clinton, these comments would be she LIED, LIED, LIED! The outrage would be intense and to say you wouldn’t would be a LIE! You’d be professing your love for Tapper and saying that he has magnificent journalistic prowess. But since the mighty Obama is infallible, Tapper must be an idiot?
Seriously, where was the outrage when Obama professed he knew his pastor to be controversial but still put him on one of his campaign committees?

Posted by: LOM | April 3, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

The familar pattern we same in the NAFTA scandal
Obama had quit smoking for good.
When he finds out ABC is going to report he has relapsed he then admits to smoking a couple times
Slowly the truth comes out.
If he relapsed in smoking will he relapse in drug use? President of the USA is the world’s most stressful job.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Since when do you have to be a smoker to smell like tobacco smoke?! Just sharing a car, plane, or talking in the same room with a smoker can make you reek of cigarrettes.
Really lame gossip, Jake.

Posted by: Mark Kraft | April 3, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Jay, this upsets me because as a former smoker, I know how hard it is to quit smoking. When you have a slip you are ashamed and embarassed. This is a horrible addiction.

Posted by: maryland | April 3, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

What Would Obama Do? Heh…
Talking Sense About Tobacco
Imagine if they joined in a high-profile, bipartisan demand for passage of what they already agree on, appealing to voters sick of the small-bore sniping of the long campaign. Hungry for a life-and-death issue? Tobacco regulation offers a singular moment to show the vision and leadership the voters yearn for.

Posted by: bmc | April 3, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I don’t care if he smokes or not. Why lie? But I think it goes to show he is as deceptive as any of the other candidates. All politicians lie or tell half-truths, even Saint Obama.

Posted by: Tina D | April 3, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

I can’t even believe I’m taking the time to respond to this ridiculousness. But apparently I am, because it’s SO ridiculous and inconsequential it comes out the other side.

Posted by: Cathy | April 3, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Obama Falls Off The Wagon

ABC’s Jake Tapper caught Obama smoking, and lying about it:Last August, I ran into Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, outside the Senate chamber in the Capitol. [. . .] As any close friend or family member can attest, I have an unusually keen sense of smel…

Posted by: CALIFORNIA YANKEE | April 3, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

It’s better than stories about him bowling or hitting the beach CNN.

Posted by: Ken | April 3, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

lol geevil. You know they say that heroin is easier to give up than cigs. Personally I wouldn’t know since I never did heroin. And smoking pot is not an addiction. People can give that up but they chose not to. Nicotine is addicting and that is a fact.

Posted by: maryland | April 3, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I can’t believe you’re coming up with this nonsense. It looks like a lame excuse for resurrecting the Goolsbee story to make Obama look bad.
Tapper fails to inform his readers about the facts of the Goolsbee “controversy.” Goolsbee had an informal meeting with low-level officials with the Canadian consulate in Chicago, NOT the Canadian embassy in Washington. Don’t you reporters know the difference?
Then the CONSERVATIE Canadian government allied with the Bush administration leaked a memo with the claim that Goolsbee said Obama’s position on NAFTA was merely political posturing. The memo didn’t even quote Goolsbee and he denied saying any such thing.
A competent journalist would place the burden of proof on the accuser, whose politics make the claim highly suspect. But I guess competence doesn’t get you anywhere in modern journalism.
The real “controversy” about the bogus Goolsbee memo should be why the Bush-friendly Canadian government was interfering with Democratic primary elections in the United States.
If this had been a liberal government doing the same in the GOP primaries, all the fake journlists would be expressing their fake outrage at the offending foreign government, not at the victim of the foreign plot.
This stupid article about Obama allegedly sneaking a smoke months ago seems to be part of another contemptible plot: the corporate US media’s attempt to get the public to elect the dangerously ignorant but corporation-friendly John McCain to the presidency.
BTW: McCain was recently caught lying about the recent unpleasantness in Basra. He had said only a few weeks ago that the Shiite cleric Al Sadr was no longer a signficant factor in Iraqi politics. After the Iraqi government was humiliated in Basra, he changed his story and said he’d always been concerned about Al Sadr’s influence in Iraq. But lies like that are no big deal when you’ve got a hot scoop about Obama sneaking a smoke eight months ago, are they?

Posted by: LF | April 3, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

You are a few days late for an April Fools joke. Slow day ah?
I also am an ex-smoker, always 1 puff away from falling off the wagon from one day to the next.

Posted by: kamldp | April 3, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

This is soooooo petty. Quite frankly, I’d be suprised if he wasn’t trying to sneak a smoke. It is a very hard habit to just quit.
It would be a different America today if you had spent this much time, energy and olfactory senses sniffing out the blatant lies and deceptions made by Bush, Cheney and Company that got us into this Iraq War. Think of all the lives that would have been saved. Instead, you think it’s more important to catch Obama at a weak moment trying to cope with a cigarette addiction. No wonder this country is going to hell in a handbasket. Everybody’s got their priorities all screwed up.

Posted by: G Johnson | April 3, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I realize this is a blog and different journalism standards apply, but if you dont have any solid evidence or proof this isn’t news. What you believe or what you think arent things that we care about- we care about the facts, and if you don’t have any then please do us a favor and stop the accusations, the claims and the inneundo.

Posted by: Erica | April 3, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Hey, Nobama-
“Dues” he needs to pay before running for president? Last time I checked the only dues were to be a 35 year old American born citizen.
Are the dues you refer to sleeping with the president? So you would support a President Monica? Or is it just being a family member- so that’s why you supported Bush? John Edwards had only been elected to one office, so had GWB. Hillary as exactly one election under belt more than Obama- so support Biden because he has the longest resume. Or you should support Richardson because he is the only one with exective and foreign policy experience. But this idea that hillary has so much more experience than obama is just nonsense.

Posted by: Colleen Mahaney | April 3, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Jay, I’ve been quit almost 3 years and I don’t think about it at all anymore. That first year was rough through. I quit with the help of an online smoking cessation forum. I couldn’t have done it without them. The key is to change your mindset about smoking. Congrats to you for quitting so long ago

Posted by: maryland | April 3, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I was an Obama supporter until I went to hear him speak and he told the audience that he was not taking money from federally registered lobbyist. That struck me as odd since the week before I had received a list of bundlers registered as federal lobbyist for each of the candidates both republican and democratic and in my curiosity I had checked out my candidate of choice and found that Barrack Obama had a list of 10 bundlers registered as federal lobbyist. Was I mistaken about what actually constitutes a federally registered lobbyist? I wrote his campaign and enquired about it, the response came quickly, his campaign told me that he was not excepting money from federally register lobbyist but he was accepting individual contributions from individuals who work for firms that are federally registered lobbyist. My initial response to this answer was less than favorable my secondary response was to check the facts. After doing a little digging I found that 9 of the 10 on my list were personally registered as federal lobbyist that Barrack Obama had at that time a total of 359 bundlers contributing to his campaign and that he also has an additional 9 federally registered lobbyist currently on his staff. Since then I have seen countless adds on TV where Obama proclaims his campaigns financial independence from Lobbyist and have decided that if I can’t believe what Obama says there is no way he can represent change I can believe in.

Posted by: charlie | April 3, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

This is not petty. It’s a question of honesty. I don’t care if he smokes or not, I care that OBAMA LIES about EVERYTHING.
That’s what I care about:
NAFTA-Canadans, Rezko, Wright, plans, etc, etc, etc.
Obama is not fit for public office.

Posted by: Lin | April 3, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Now all this talk about universal health care is starting to make sense. The man has poor judgment on his pastor and now poor judgment on his personal health. Excellent reporting.

Posted by: Neo | April 3, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Guess it depends where he’s been.
I haven’t smoked for 15 years, but I met with friends a week ago and came away reeking of smoke.

Posted by: Ron S. | April 3, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Jake, I think this was funny. And boy do we need a laugh.

Posted by: Viola | April 3, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Jake….
LOL….good job! He probabaly will say: “Oh…but I didn’t inhale..”
My concern is for those 2 little girls….2nd hand smoke is HORRIBLE, I know …my co-worker smokes…and even if he does it outside…I get a headache from the stench of smoke from him…
What a fraud!

Posted by: jan | April 3, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Smoking nowadays is not using good judgment and is usually followed with other vices. I also hate the people who lie when they smoke. Is this a good representation of America?

Posted by: Jessica | April 3, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Lauren | Apr 3, 2008 9:46:24 AM
—-
Next time, instead of thinking about what the cigarette will be like, try to think about how you’ll feel afterwards.
Been there, done that.

Posted by: Ron S. | April 3, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Ok, all of these people are writing comments, complaining about jake writing this obama smokes.
I write some real truth about obama and you delete it.
no matter it will come out
in the general
obama cannot win

Posted by: jgaw | April 3, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

In any case wouldn’t it be a good idea to have more than circumstantial evidence before trying to trash people’s character. Supposing everything else is true, we still don’t know whether the senator was *with* someone else who was smoking. That famous sense of smell must be picking getting it from his clothes, but we still wouldn’t know who was doing the smoking.

Posted by: Chris Dornan | April 3, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

I see Jake’s point, the Goolsbee controversy is not the only thing that is problematic. His ties to REZKO, his going back and forth on Rev. Wright are all matters that concern me. These things indicate a lack of good judgement. If one is willing to lie/cover-up little things, what will happen with bigger mistakes???

Posted by: svsolis | April 3, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Wait? What?! Your “story” is that you THINK Obama snuck a cigarette, but his PARTY told you that he’d quit in February? C’mon Jake. I guess you have some down time after fully detailing all of President Bush’s lies. And then you mention the Goolsbee controversy while adding that Obama isn’t the worst offender?! I’ll break it down for you, Obama is NOT a saint, he’s NOT the pope, he HAS and WILL make mistakes, but he’s by far the best candidate left in this race.

Posted by: Chris | April 3, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

he lied to you about smoking?! if only you had been around when george bush liead about weapons of mass destruction in iraq — oh wait you were.
move on, nothing to see here.

Posted by: rnewton | April 3, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

The fact that Senator Obama may have smoked a cigarette does not bother me. It is the fact that Senator Obama does not tell the truth about small or large issues that reflect on his character that I find disgusting. It simply shows he lacks judgement and intergity. Does America want a liar in the White House? A LIE IS A LIE IS A LIE.
As an ex-smoker, it is hard to quit and not pick up the habit again, unfortunately.

Posted by: Mary Holmes | April 3, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

This is news? Why don’t you concern yourself over Bush’s repeated lies about Iraq than whether Obama fibbed about smoking. For the love of Pete.

Posted by: terry levine | April 3, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

I missed in the article where Obama told the reporter that he didn’t smoke.
This has to be the dumbest thing that I have ever read.

Posted by: Ashaki | April 3, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

I have not seen any part of the country uniting under Obama. If the divides in this country weren’t bad enough his campaign and church has now managed split the democrat party. How good will this be for the country.
Hillary could have brought the dems together blacks and whites. Now what?

Posted by: Jessica | April 3, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Way too much focus was put on Hillary’s Bosnia trip. This is worse I think because its a character flaw not a one-time exaggeration to put a little drama in her story.

Posted by: Jessica | April 3, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

And I was just thinking that you were one of the sensible journalists. Now I’m hit smack in the face with the reality that you’re actually a silly street reporter trying to get a headline.
You were right when you said:
“It’s not a big deal in the scheme of things — the war on Iraq, a major economic crisis — indeed, it’s miniscule. Hardly worth mentioning.”
You should have went with your gut instinct and wrote about something that actually mattered since you deem yourself my representative. If you were actually MY representative, you’d know that I wouldn’t care one way or the other if he smokes or not.
Kennedy smoked and I don’t think the country suffered at all because he did.
Report some news please and quit wasting my time and bandwidth.

Posted by: Democrats '08! YES WE CAN! | April 3, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Obama recently drew headlines when he described the more than 3,000 Americans killed in Iraq since 2003 as wasted lives. (He subsequently apologized.) But he should know that about 600,000 Americans have died of lung cancer during the four years of the Iraq war — almost all of them because of smoking.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

So what if he fell of the wagon. I commend him for trying and eventually stopping. You should be concerned and writing about why CLINTON LIED ABOUT SNIPER FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Ruth | April 3, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

This is sure proof that this campaign needs to end. A professional newsman wonders if a surreptitious and unconfessed cigarette should be a campaign issue, and readers suggested, if Obama lied (to whom? his campaign folks?), this would be worse than saying you flew into Bosnia under gunfire.
What next? Hillary’s terrible, unconfessed nailbiting habit? Give the man (and the woman, for that matter) some space to be a human being.

Posted by: dc | April 3, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Jake, maybe it was/is none of your business. Why don’t you sniff up a real story. Obama doesn’t owe you any answers as to what he had for lunch or whether he smoked a cigarette-they are legal you know. what are you, his mother? this is really pathetic.

Posted by: trish | April 3, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Wow, you mean Obama’s human? I didn’t think I could like the guy even more, but now I do.

Posted by: Jack | April 3, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Jake, you have got to be putting us on! You call the man a liar because you smelled smoke. I got to wonder what you’ve been smoking. I quit in ’73, but when I come home from a card game or the bowling alley, my wife tells me I’ve been smoking, which I wasn’t, but smoke hangs on you. Get real.

Posted by: Ray, Naples | April 3, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Jake,
For you to act surprised that Obama lied to you is funny to me.
You guys know that this guy lies and each time he does it you in the media bury it.
If Hillary is the one that lies, you magnify the story 10 times. History will not be kind to you in MSM. You are all in Obama camp and we know it. Even NPR (public media) is in that camp too.
You guys are selling to the American people a worthless bill of goods and you know it. Sad thing is that it’s too late to reverse the damage.

Posted by: SO1 | April 3, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Good ‘ole main stream journalism where it only takes “suspicion” and not PROOF to file a story.
Jake Tapper you are a credit to your profession – NOT!
I don’t care if ANY candidate smokes. Stick to the darn issues!!!!!

Posted by: Toni | April 3, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

I can’t figure out why the heck the press hasn’t bothered to flesh out the more agregious white lies that BHO has been engaged. Am I the only person who remembers that in a debate when confronted about his relationship with Tony Rezko BHO blew Hillary off by stating that it was simple 5 billable hours of legal work. Go back and review the video. Now that was a whopper to me because it was not only intellectually dishonest but extremely misleading to the public.

Posted by: VoterNotYetCounted | April 3, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Jay, Let me add one more lie to Obama’s pantheon of lies. In an article in 1990, after he won the election as President of the Harvard Law Review he inflated his father’s resume. He lied and said his father had been a Finance Minister in Kenya. He wasn’t. He was a bureaucrat.
Back then (or even now for that matter) who would care? So, why would he lie when it didn’t even matter. Obama seems like a guy not comfortable in his own skin.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“It’s not a big deal in the scheme of things — the war on Iraq, a major economic crisis — indeed, it’s miniscule. Hardly worth mentioning.”
I think you should have stopped there. Grow up.

Posted by: ADF | April 3, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Is this for real? I think the news media has become so silly and, yes, stupid, that they no longer know how to write a relevant story. Who cares about Obama’s struggle to give up smoking? So thoroughly irrelevant.
This reporter needs to get a life.

Posted by: Julie Riegel | April 3, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

I’m thinking that the reason so many of Obama’s supporters are all worked up here is that if they were honest, they find smoking really distasteful and look down their noses at people who smoke. They’re probably the ones – like me – that support ordinances against smoking in public and increased taxes on cigarettes as a way to reduce this habit – and the incredible cost on society. They probably would not marry a smoker either – and again, they look down their noses at the average smoker. Obama, in their eyes, is anything but “average”. But how do they know?
I do know that their outrage about your printing this story is incredibly outsized.
I think that they believe, like I do, that Obama’s smoking as a 45 + year old man is a character flaw. Anyone between the ages of (35 – 60 years old) has been bombarded since childhood with anti-smoking messages. Also, the dangers of “second hand” smoke have been well known for almost as long.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Obama has a problem with how overweight Americans have become. I agree with him, and I cheer anyone on who tries to become healthier in the way they eat and exercise. However, I did not lose my dad because he was overweight. I lost him because my mother blew two packs of cigarette smoke in his face every day for over 50 years. It took her to her grave and him not two years later. If the senator wants to chide Americans for a less than healthy lifestyle, he needs to clean up his own act. Just one instance of Obama “preaching” to us all.

Posted by: RB | April 3, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

And what does this have to do with poverty in America, education, crime, the war????

Posted by: Andre | April 3, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

If it is “hardly worth mentioning,” why did you waste a whole column on it? Pretty silly, frankly. As Smokin’ Obama said, we can go on finding distractions to talk about year after year and avoid dealing with real issues. Good job, you just found another distraction we can discuss for a few days (maybe if Fox News picks up the story?). A perfect example of an all smoke, no fire silly news story.

Posted by: Valdir | April 3, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Jake,
You must have strike a nerve on the Obama supporters with your story. They are all whinning as usual.
Can you imagine stinking up the White House with cigarrete smoke? That is just what will happen.

Posted by: SO1 | April 3, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Why don’t you find a clip of Obama smoking a cigarette and loop it over and over and over and over and show it to the superdelegates to prove that he is a wicked wicked smoking person and simply can’t win!
You people are really not serious!

Posted by: scott | April 3, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Clearly this is written by someone who has never been close to someone trying to quit smoking. I have no doubt that he may have snuck a smoke — and was probably being harder on himself than anyone else could have been for doing so. Denial? You bet! It’s part of the nasty guilt trying to quit this addiction brings with it. It would be nice to have a human in the presidency who admits his humanity — instead of lying to us to try to prove that he’s some sort of demigod.

Posted by: Randy | April 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

S.valenti said:
Jay, Let me add one more lie to Obama’s pantheon of lies. In an article in 1990, after he won the election as President of the Harvard Law Review he inflated his father’s resume. He lied and said his father had been a Finance Minister in Kenya. He wasn’t. He was a bureaucrat.
—————————————
Are you sure S.Valenti? Because I’m pretty sure Obama said somewhere (I believe it was at the 2004 dem convention) that his dad was a goat herder…
So which is it? Finance minister or Goat herder?

Posted by: Jsn | April 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

during the process of quiting almost everyone falls of the wagon on occasion. It takes time. And to quit in the midst of a presidential race has got to be the ultimate test.
and from experience… everyone lies about smoking when they are trying to quit!!

Posted by: lwr | April 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

in other words obama supporters
It is not so much the smokin cigarette
as it is the cover up”

Posted by: jgaw | April 3, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

While it would wonderful to believe that Obama — and every other presidential candidate — spoke the truth all the time about matters large and small, the reality is they don’t and can’t. Everything a candidate says can be spun out of control. In this case, if he indeed had slipped and had a cigarette at that moment, you would most likely have written an article about his failed attempt to quit. Such an article would have undermined his continuing efforts to quit smoking and sent a terrible message to the youth of our nation. I, for one, can live with the possibility that he chose not to mention the slip because he firmly intended to continue working on his addiction.

Posted by: Ellen | April 3, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

I don’t think it is such a big deal about Obama having a tough time giving up cigarettes and lying about it. It just show a lack of will power like many show giving up the drug (tobacco) sanctioned by the government that is a direct link to lung cancer, heart disease and many other ailments. What I want to know is Obama telling the truth about not hearing Rev. Wright rant and rave against America? Has any reporter taken the time to document every time Obama went to that church and compared that with every sermon by Rev. Wright? Or is this another “free pass” for Obama by the media?

Posted by: John T. Bower | April 3, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Smokers are lepers in our society. I smoke and I’ve hidden it for years from family and friends. Why shouldn’t a politician be wary of letting on that he hasn’t been able to quit when we live in an ultra-critical society with a pathological hatred of smoking and smokers?

Posted by: Julia | April 3, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Patients Lie

Jake Tapper is shocked that Barack Obama lied about cigarette smoking. If we can trust Tappers unusually keen sense of smell as much as he does, it is possible that Tapper caught Obama at a time when he fell off the wagon but denie…

Posted by: Liberal Values | April 3, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Sylvia, The truth hurts, doesn’t it.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

s. valenti: Just like the sniper fire, eh? Shall I go on?

Posted by: Sylvia in Austin | April 3, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

in other words obama supporters
It is not so much the smokin cigarette
as it is the cover up”
———-
In other words Hillary supporters it is the cover up that really matters. “Sniper-Fire,” and “Fraudulent FEC Reports.” These are the things that matter as they are public issues that concern Americans, and don’t forget going behind someone backs beggin SD to move on this them using such personal issues. I think Obama should tell the SD to vote for him because they are too Divisive, Vicious, Sexually Immoral, and more.

Posted by: Angel | April 3, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

in other words obama supporters
It is not so much the smokin cigarette
as it is the cover up”
———-
In other words Hillary supporters it is the cover up that really matters. “Sniper-Fire,” and “Fraudulent FEC Reports.” These are the things that matter as they are public issues that concern Americans, and don’t forget going behind someone backs beggin SD to move on this them using such personal issues. I think Obama should tell the SD to vote for him because they are too Divisive, Vicious, Sexually Immoral, and more.

Posted by: Angel | April 3, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Peter Jennings was from that generation like my mom’s that was already hooked on cigarettes before we started getting hit over the head with how dangerous cigarettes were. I’m sympathetic to people of that age who once addicted found it hard to stop even though they tried really hard. I have no sympathy for people my age and younger who started smoking despite being bombarded by messages about its dangers and the dangers of second hand smoke. In Obama’s generation – THERE WERE NO IMAGES TYING SMOKING TO COOL, ATTRACTIVE BEHAVIOR – so, why did he even pick up the habit. It’s a character flaw.
A character flaw of Obama’s that Peter Jennings might also be reporting if he had survived.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

s valentini- I am a smoker, my husbands a smoker and I look down my nose at no one- I am not infallible, I don’t make alot of money, didn’t go to college and I don’t drink lattes ( black coffee for me thanks) like so many here like to classify us Obama supporters. Seems to me the only person being judgemental here may be you..oh darn there I almost judged you now wouldn’t that have been such a “misstatement”

Posted by: whatever | April 3, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

OMG – do Americans really require that their leaders be perfect, saints who do absolutely no wrong, ever, in their entire lives?
If so, you are simply begging to be lied to since it is IMPOSSIBLE to be PERFECT. So what if he fell off the non-smoking band wagon. If this is what you have to resort to in an attempt to paint Obama as a dissembler, than you don’t deserve decent politicians of any stripe.
Even the NAFTA issue would barely be a story in most democratic countries since the Canadian govt acknowledged and apoligized for 1) misquoting the advisor 2) for the media leak 3) implying that it was the campaign who contacted the consulate when in fact it was (my) Canadian govt representatives who asked to speak to the advisor as originally reported.
Focus people – you have a severe economic crisis, you are fighting two wars that aren’t going very well and you have a current President that is harming your international standing (ie environment, preemptive wars, etc.).

Posted by: cicely | April 3, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Obama is a politician, and a slick one at that. If mainstream media journalists wanted to, they could write about some of his distortions of the truth that are more significant than waffling about whether he has given up cigs. However, if Tapper has the guts to report about Obama’s campaign staff lying about Obama smoking, that is better than nothing. It reinforces the impression created by the Rev. Wright controversy that Obama’s impulse is to deny if possible, and face up to his problems only when he is forced to do so. I think Tapper is right on target that this tendency is something to be concerned about.

Posted by: Older but Wiser | April 3, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Let’ take a survey of all the people outraged by this story who support Obama AND who also look down their noses at the average smoker.
That’s what’s really got you all worked up – you need to think that your guy is extraordinary. He’s not.
You just don’t want to confront your hypocrisy.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

I think this is crazy. Why worry about the small stuff that has nothing to do about presidency. what if your boss was smoking, would you post an article on him. better yet what if your mother was, would you post one on her???

Posted by: Jamie;) | April 3, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Obama did not lie about his smoking. He is in denial. The same way he and other Democrats are in denial about the war being won in Iraq.

Posted by: bill | April 3, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

tlhwraith, Don’t let your shorts get all twisted up! You Obama people are something else!

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

s valenti, I support the dem nominee. My problem is that this article touched a nerve with me because I’m an exsmoker. It is extremely difficult to quit. And people are too embarrassed and ashamed to admit they had a slip. They feel like a failure. It’s a very personal decision to quit and no one’s elses business. I applaud people who try to quit. And I know the pain they go through.

Posted by: maryland | April 3, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Funny how thin-skinned Obama and his supporters are. The smallest perceived slight draws out an enraged mob of Obamabots to eviscerate whoever dares to question or insult their savior. It is so ridiculous that it is rather an amusing sport to see how little it takes to provoke the ire. It’s sad that I find this amusing because I am a life-long Democrat. I even contributed money to Obama early in his campaign, before Rezco, Exelon, Wright, Goolsbee and so much more turned me off. If this is my reaction, imagine how conservatives will react. Once they get to know the Obamas a bit better, the criticism that they leveled on the Kerreys and the Clintons will pale in comparison and the thin-skinned reaction of Obama and the Obamabots will only egg them on.

Posted by: NJH | April 3, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

I’d think that TEAMOBAMA would welcome the distraction from the ever-cascading fall-out of the Wright scandal that may seem to be ebbing. That’s just because the republicans are holding onto it if he succeeds in making it to the general election. A big IF these days.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

I know exactly what you mean – I felt the same way when I heard Obama on The View imply that Rev. Wright had acknowledged that some of his remarks were offensive and inappropriate. Of course Wright had not done that. It was just creative phraseology on Obama’s part. It made me feel like I was being…I don’t know…hoodwinked? bamboozled?

Posted by: Barb in MN | April 3, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

So is he smoking or isn’t he?

Posted by: RuthieM | April 3, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Is George Bush drinkin or isn’t he?

Posted by: RuthieM | April 3, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

GASP!!!
“Mr. Perfect” smoking?
Democrats are so stupid and are falling for this obnoxious, arrogant rookie!
He’s even got his kool-aid drinkers acting full of hatred towards anyone who doesn’t worship the grounds HE walks on! I’ll never understand why so many Democrats are acting like Republicans…Pure Hatred…scary!!!

Posted by: Bunnygirl | April 3, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

The majority of the comments about Mr. Obama seems to try to find some kind of fault with him. How many Americans smoke? Is it a crime?(why not?, if it is so bad for “everyone”). Why hasn’t congress banded it from the country???)With everything being thrown at him from all directions, he will probablly need 2 or 3 packs to deal with every congressman/congresswoman’s own personal agender. At least he is “willing” to attempt to change and try to improve the direction of the country and the life and livelyhood of our “citizens.It is time to get issues taken care of at home(USA).Have we developed a strong enough defense at home from thr rest of the world?Have we put enough resource and developement into becoming a self substaining country(this is attainable).Do we efficiently take care of our “old”(who sacrificed to keep our freemdom in the world),do we efficiently take care of our “young” who will be our future citizens and congress making all the decisions for the country, and lastly do we efficiently take care of the working citizens in the middle who are the blood, sweat, and tears of this “United States of America”. Something has to Change or “WE” want be the “America” that the world wanted to immulate. I don’t have another counrty (or do I want)to live in. I want to be Happy, Productive,and at Peace in these United States of America.
A 56 years old citizen of the USA.

Posted by: A.Mahan | April 3, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

You know, I currently support Senator Clinton, but am finding it difficult to hold a lie or two about smoking against Obama.
I do, however, think there are much stronger arguments about his lies out there. For instance, Karl Rove in his interview with an abc reporter mentioned that Obama lied about him in his book, and essentially didn’t own up to it when confronted about the lie (seems to be a pattern for him).
The biggest problems I see for Obama are that he is arrogant, disingenuous and inexperienced, doesn’t own up to mistakes, and has a whole lot of baggage from Chicago that is going to hit him like a ton of bricks should he become the nominee. (Oh, and I’m sure we’ll be treated to some lovely post election scenes from his cousin’s run in Kenya — hopefully they won’t be too graphic, or we’ll all end up with nightmares.)
As it is, he already has very little appeal to blue collar voters, and his ties to Rev. Wright, Mr. Rezko, Mr. Ayers, and his cousin in Kenya should decrease his appeal with that group even more (too bad those silly Democrats can’t learn to respect those blue collar voters, if they did, they might actually have a chance of winning an election, and too bad those crazy Obama supporters labeled me an old hag on the blogs and boasted about not needing the votes of the old depends wearing hags that support Clinton — I didn’t bother to tell them that I’m younger than Obama).

Posted by: Sharon | April 3, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

It’s Hillary’s fault.

Posted by: Pete | April 3, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

aside from the fact that this is minutiae that isn’t remotely newsworthy, i don’t see what the lie here is. you didn’t ask sen. obama if he had just smoked a cigarette or not; you asked his campaign. they gave you the best information they had at the time, which was that his quitting was successful. is he required to phone his campaign HQ every time he takes a drag?
he told the truth on hardball last night, which was that he had fallen off the wagon a few times. where’s the inconsistency?

Posted by: riles | April 3, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

“I know exactly what you mean – I felt the same way when I heard Obama on The View imply that Rev. Wright had acknowledged that some of his remarks were offensive and inappropriate. Of course Wright had not done that. It was just creative phraseology on Obama’s part. It made me feel like I was being…I don’t know…hoodwinked? bamboozled?”
Posted by: Barb in MN | Apr 3, 2008 3:04:35 PM
Barb, you nailed it.

Posted by: Vnd | April 3, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

The all-time low of American media at its worst – petty, mean-spirited, distracting, gossippy, trivial, pandering and just plain low-IQ. No wonder serious discourse doesn’t get heard. There goes 15 minutes of my life, never to be recovered, and not a thing to show for it.

Posted by: Roma Nariar | April 3, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

I don’t like the feeling that someone is being straight with me, like McCain with his campaign not being upfront with the FEC, or him backtracking on torture, but not being upfront about his PRIVATE habit of smoking!!!! To the BLOG!! Maybe I missed your blog post about McCain’s FEC adventures or maybe his mental slips about al-Queida in Iran..straight talk indeed…the humanity of it all! Priorities of the media, I’m amazed, stunned..but as long as it is your job to make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, then I can’t wait for your expose on how McCain (of McCain-Feingold fame)can play the deceitful game of finance reform (was he for it before he was against it?)…baited…breath…chirp..chirp(crickets)…Milo

Posted by: tim borowicz | April 3, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

JenJen is right. The real problem with this is that smoking is only one of Obama’s habits. We cannot have a druggie for a President. If Obama is not strong enough to quit and is afraid of Michelle NOW, imagine what he will be like in Office. Actually I think SNL already has. Perhaps this is what has riled up the obama followers. He is not the cool cucumber he pretends to be -he is more like Barney Fife than Andy Taylor.

Posted by: geevill | April 3, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Actually it may not have been a lie. As a former smoker (in remission) I know you quit many times! So for him to say to his staff he hadn’t had a cigarette since he (last) quit is true for all us addicts who are despised up by the morally upstanding and never sinful journalists. We have no willpower! Can’t we be accepted inspite of this one vice?

Posted by: natal | April 3, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

This is hilarious – all you Obama people going through all these contortions about smoking, quitting, smoking, quitting, lying about quitting, smoking, lying ……..
For Obama to have started smoking is evidence of a character flaw – a kind of arrogance that seems to say – despite all the health information to the contrary – I want to do it, I’m going to do it – No matter what anyone says.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

This is important, because it shows that Obama thinks he can lie. A lie is a lie, i guess this is the “good judgement” that he is going to show us. More importantly, he told Larry King he was never heard Rev. Wright speak “that way,” and then in his speech said he did hear him. So, which is it? Did he, or did he not hear them. Just “words?” or another lie?

Posted by: shireen | April 3, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Who cares????????

Posted by: FLOOD | April 3, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Good God, Jake. Why don’t you use that fantastic nose of yours and do some real reporting. Sniff out some corruption in D.C, I’m sure if you smell hard enough you can find some. Our nations capital positively reeks with it. Unfortunately, it also smells of stinky reporters who don’t have the brains to report on issues that REALLY MATTER to folks. Jeebus.

Posted by: Kelmac | April 3, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Jake wants to sniff Obama’s boxers. Get a life, you idiot. I swear, you white boys are obsessed with this man. I bet you wanna know his dyck size too, don’t you.

Posted by: Kelley | April 3, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

You are seriously worried that Obama may have lied to you about whether he smoked a cigarette? And you think this is in some way comparable to the unending flow of lies from Clinton and her campaign, starting with the completely ridiculous claim that when she voted for the war in Iraq, she thought she was voting for inspections? You must be joking.

Posted by: TKD | April 3, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Just Maybe he didn’t smoke that day….
have you thought of that before you put his personal business out there.
Next thing you will as him how many times he jiggles his penis after he is done peeing.
you are no reporter, get a life!

Posted by: Nolawi | April 3, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Obama is Smokin’—-
So?

Posted by: Puff | April 3, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

With all the other BS that the current Administration Throw at us and the media on a daily basis. All drastically more consequential than the question as to whether Barack Obama had smoked a cigarette or not. I mean I used to smoke over 20 Years ago. I have not Smoked Since. Yet like many people who smoke or have smoked we tend to have friends or family who smoke and they sometimes smoke around me and Some would swear that I had been smoking. So, Could the smoke that Jake swears to smelled during the interview possibly have come from another source and got into the clothes?????? Jake, you are Pathetic

Posted by: Will | April 3, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Wow Jack – such indignation. It’s a good thing no one in this current administration has lied. Or better yet, at least McCain is still a straight talker when it comes to campaign finance. Now THAT would be something, wouldn’t it.

Posted by: Dave | April 3, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

So, fibbing to Jake Tapper, who passes on lies of all sorts, is a big deal and “worth mentioning” and, according to another poster, lying to Karl Rove is too.
Okay, just so we’ve all got our facts straight. Let’s ignore the folks in power who tried to basically unwrite the constitution, this is important!
Justify your paycheck, Mr. Tapper. FIND SOME NEWS and before you hold candidates to an absurd standard of honesty, stop passing along lies in your apparent vendetta (for lying!) against Obama. You may just be the least trustworthy name in American journalism, my friend. And THAT is saying something.

Posted by: Bob | April 3, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Yeah and Hillary is on crack and McCain is obviously shooting dope. But I’m still voting for the smoker dude.

Posted by: Jim B | April 3, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

s valenti, smoking is not a character flaw. And who are you to judge

Posted by: maryland | April 3, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

*sniff
I made a comment and you didn’t publish it, I didn’t even use bad words.

Posted by: Elliott | April 3, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Goodness Jake! Don’t you have anything better to do?

Posted by: tasho | April 3, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

An idiotic article for numbskulls written by a fool. Do you know any more about what Obama told Wall Street last week concerning regulation of the industry? Do you know how he’ll handle the biggest economic crisis in the USA since 1929? Of course you don’t! Because ABC covers this tripe instead. And then you debate it. Mission accomplished, corporate media!

Posted by: sienna | April 3, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Even though I’m against the war and I know that McCain’s economic plans will push the country further into recession I’ll still vote for him because the other guy had a bad pastor and smoked a cigarette. I’m willing to sacrifice the economic wellbeing of the country and another 4,011 American lives rather than have a guy in the White House who had a bad paster and smoked a cigarette. The choice is clear and the issues are apparent.

Posted by: Jim B | April 3, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

What a joke? Obama admitted to Chris Matthews yesterday that he fell off the wagon a couple of times we he quit smoking. Don’t we have important things to cover in this campaign. You remember the issues like the war and the economy.

Posted by: KQuark | April 3, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

There is something called second hand smoke. If you are in a room with a smoker you can end up smelling like smoke without actually smoking yourself. Unless you have footage this is a nonstory.

Posted by: Samosa Stardom | April 3, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Jessica, I agree

Posted by: maryland | April 3, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Jessica, I don’t care what you think.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 3, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

We are simply sick and tired of the Republican agenda for the past 8 years, which has easily landed us in dept of trillions. America borrowing from Arab countries? No way! McCain blindly promises to follow Bushe’s steps. If I do not vote for Obama, who seem to be the smartest for now, I will stay home.

Posted by: Anthony K | April 3, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

We are simply sick and tired of the Republican agenda for the past 8 years, which has easily landed us in dept of trillions. America borrowing from Arab countries? No way! McCain blindly promises to follow Bushe’s steps. If I do not vote for Obama, who seem to be the smartest for now, I will stay home.

Posted by: Anthony K | April 3, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Is this important? C’mon, get real…

Posted by: Pembleton | April 3, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

“many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth”
You have to be kidding, right? Where have you been for the last 7 years?

Posted by: Richard | April 3, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

well, so much for an educated debate on the matter then

Posted by: Jessica | April 3, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Obama’s a liar!?! Wow, gee, shucks, golly and gosh. I’d never have thunk it.

Posted by: Rev.St.Huck | April 3, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Thanks for the story. Just goes to show you that Obama is not this god-like figure that people think he is.

Posted by: rachel | April 3, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

“Except that I don’t like feeling that I wasn’t being dealt with honestly. And as much as citizens who are suspect of the media might scoff at such a notion, many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we’re confident is the right one. (Corny, I know.)”
This piece is parody, right? I assume that last paragraph was a joke?
WMD to the north, west and south of Baghdad.
6 weeks, probably not 6 months
We’ve turned the corner.
Last throes.
It will only cost 15 billion dollars.
Oil revenues will pay for reconstruction.
We don’t torture.
You’re doing a heckofa job Brownie.
Excuse me now while I roll on the floor with spasms of hilarity.

Posted by: Aldorossi | April 3, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

As a non-smoker, I regularly reeked of tobacco after my weekly poker game. If I didn’t air my clothes out thoroughly, they’d smell of tobacco for days. If I didn’t take an immediate shower, my hair would smell so bad I couldn’t get to sleep. So the smell of tobacco alone can’t tell you much about a person’s behavior. Not that I care about this non-issue.

Posted by: Albany Bill | April 3, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

whoops … meant to write “hasn’t passed many bills” in the last line of my post. apologies

Posted by: gadfrey | April 3, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Thank god, Obama’s human! I’ve been trying to make him my role model in my battle to quit smoking, but it turns out – more realistically – that we’ll be each other’s accountability partners instead.

Posted by: Andy E | April 3, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

You know you people need to take some time off work and look in your holier than thou mirrors. OR quit trying to hold your politicians to a standard that none of us could. How many white lies are told everyday, how many lies are told everyday. We lie all the time…go aheadthink about it…Tomorrow at work count up how many lies you tell at work in one day, or challenge yourself not to tell any lies for one day white or otherwise….You can’t!!!

Posted by: Vince | April 3, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Newsflash — Campaign aides fib. Obama told the truth, and thankfully you reported that fact honestly.

Posted by: JedReport | April 3, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Obama’s run for the Presidency is starting to resemble the Wizard of Oz! Who’s behind the curtain of this image we’ve been sold?
It’s starting to get creepy.
I think everybody’s been had.

Posted by: Evelyn | April 3, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

hey I wonder if Obama lied about Iraq WMDs?
oh nevermind!!!

Posted by: Bobby | April 3, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

$40 million in March! He’s smokin’ alright! Yes We Can!

Posted by: Rob Davies | April 3, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

hillary’s lies could choke an oxe
where are her tax returns?
who paid for the clinton libary ($165 million)
come on let’s get real
OBAMA 08

Posted by: Alex K | April 3, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Obama will say (lie about) anything to get elected. I voted for Hillary in the primary but if Obama is nominated I’ll vote for McCain.

Posted by: helmann | April 3, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

there a few things in life i hate more than cigarettes and the smoke from them. but after 2 Bush terms i’ll take Obama anyway – smoke or no smoke. i think he’ll be one of our finest presidents.

Posted by: mox | April 3, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

A nicotine addict who chews nictoine gum is still an addict. An addict who lies about his habit is also a liar.

Posted by: Jeff Spangler | April 3, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

I have a bad feeling we will find out all kinds OB one – but by then it will be too late!! Who you have Sunday church time with speaks volumes.

Posted by: pwill | April 3, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

I only care about Obama stopping Clinton. If he does, I will be sincerely grateful to him, then I will vote for Bob Barr.

Posted by: redmanrt | April 3, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Many will make excuses for Obama and try and minimize this, but it you lie about the little things, you will lie about the big things.
There is something fundamentally not honest about this man.
He is far from the uniter, healer and consensus builder he has made himself out to be. He supported infanticide in the Illinois State Senate, for gosh sakes and sat for 20 years in a black separatist church and never did a thing that I have seen him credited for to bridge the gap between his parishioners and the larger society.
He’s too much of a fringe candidate to bring this nation together and I have not seen him offer anything that appears to be anything other than left wing positions and warmed over Mondale economic doctrine. (Sorry, Gerry!)
He’s been blowing smoke for far too long and still doing it!

Posted by: Pete Kent | April 3, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

This story is such a waste of space! Let’s focus on what’s important.

Posted by: Tina Gerami | April 3, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Most of you missed the point of this article. The point was not that he had snuck cigarettes. The point was he lied about it. His campaign also lied about it. What else might he be lying about? That’s the point. He changed his story several times about what he did and didn’t know about Wright’s comments. He changes his story quite a bit. That’s the point. And that maybe he’s just not all that different from any other politician.

Posted by: vicki | April 3, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Great. One more reason for those us living on Tobacco Road in North Carolina to support Obama. I’ve sent him two nice contributions, and I will contribute again.

Posted by: Bob Auman | April 3, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

So the Clinton strategy is taking shape. Hillary’s saying Obama just can’t win, though he’s won more Democratic primary votes, and also, that he’s a dirty smoker. For shame Barack Obama!
This story is a joke. Remember what Admiral William Halsey said – “I never trust a fighting man who doesn’t smoke or drink.”

Posted by: HoBoSkillet | April 3, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Jim B. -
You hit the nail on the head. There are thousands of people who would abandon Obama because he’s one of those smokers and for that issue and that issue alone. Don’t be surprised if the Clinton surrogates push this story.

Posted by: HoBoSkillet | April 3, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

“It’s not a big deal in the scheme of things — the war on Iraq, a major economic crisis — indeed, it’s miniscule. Hardly worth mentioning.”
The one salient point in this article.
I’ll confess, when I saw this headline over on Huffington Post I thought it was from the Onion or something. Silly me, to have imagined for a moment that America’s corporate media still might have more substance than this.
Tell you what–four years from now, when we’re still pouring our blood and treasure into the sands of Iraq, Afghanistan, and quite possibly Iran; when the Reagan-Bush-McCain Supreme Court has made abortion illegal and the First and Fourth Amendments irrelevant; when gas is five or six bucks a gallon and we still have done nothing to expand either alternative energy or public transportation; when the number of uninsured Americans is up to 60 million or so; when the wealthiest are twice as rich and the rest of us twice as poor as we are now; when we are even further toward the bottom of the industrialized world in public health, fiscal soundness, and educational achievement; then let’s all gather here and remind each other of how very important it was that Barack Obama had a pastor who said a few off-the-wall things during 30 years of public service, that he once bought part of a lot with Tony Rezko, that he had a funny-sounding name, and that he might have smoked after he said he’d quit.

Posted by: rastewart | April 3, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

“Anyone who smokes in this 21st century, what with all the knowledge and proof we now have about smoking’s dire effects on health, has arguably SUSPECT common sense!”
Ok…if you are certain about that, perhaps you should suggest Hillary include this fact in her PA stump speeches: “Anyone who smokes in the 20th century does not have common sense!!! I mean you X% of the electorate!”
Newsflash: many people smoke. many people have trouble quitting.

Posted by: molasko | April 3, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

He’s a chronic dissembler about the little stuff. His web site says he has a degree in “international relations” from Columbia, which doesn’t offer such a degree to undergraduates. Why not call it the B.A. in political science that it was? It’s not as if he needs to mislead in order to prove his academic credentials. It’s not as if he hadn’t later served as editor of the Harvard Law Review. He claimed the title “professor,” which he never held and which is reserved for publishing academics. Again, it’s not as if he hadn’t been offered such a position. Why dissemble unless the goal was to touch up his image for the price of straightforwardness?
What galls me about the Trinity church issue is that he backed away from his obvious commitment to the place the way Dukakis backed away from the “liberal” label. Trinity is a fine church, and I hope that’s why Obama was there for 20 years (and not just to establish a political base). But if he can’t defend Trinity as, for example, Melissa Harris-Lacewell has done on theRoot.com, how are we to expect him to stick up for the people who elect him if push comes to shove?
The word “doughface” comes to mind.

Posted by: tennisgrl | April 3, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Are you kidding me? Why weren’t you asking George Bush as many questions when he said we had to go to war with Iraq? You and your compadres just accepted it!! Anybody with any GD sense would have KNOWN that war with Iraq was a bad idea.
Now we’re stuck – because the MSM in more interested in BS like whether or not a candidate seeks a cigarette.

Posted by: Michele | April 3, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

It is difficult to stop a strong addiction (and one that makes both the tobacco and healthcare industries loads of money I might add.) I sympathize with his attempts to unload his addiction in the midst of what is probably the most stressful heretofore period of his life. Just wait if he is elected; it won’t get any easier.
And it indeed does make a difference that this potential POCUS engages in behavior that is, well, self-destructive and may limit his staying power. His mother died prematurely of cancer remember. Why would an intelligent man allow himself to dink with that crud in the first place. Lack of judgement.

Posted by: SpaceCat | April 3, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Except that I don’t like feeling that I wasn’t being dealt with honestly. And as much as citizens who are suspect of the media might scoff at such a notion, many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we’re confident is the right one.
&&&&&&&&&&& o &&&&&&&&
Oops,
Well you may think taht it’s a little bit childish.
Just try to understand the author. The fact is that this is the kind of reaction that flatters our ego. We just need to spread them and let people thinking that we’re the one who has been to X or Y office and discover that he is C-sniffer… Wait and see, next time he may bring us the scoop (?) HC takes two beer per day for example (?)
By the way it’s pathetic as far as he has nothing to give us than private discussion with a guy who let him go too close to his circle and at the same time refused to avow that he has a ‘péché mignon’.

Posted by: Psycho | April 3, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

How do we know he won’t fall off the drug wagon, too, since he has also admitted doing some heavy-duty drugs? This guy is a fraud!!!

Posted by: Chappy4 | April 3, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Reading this account raises only one question: is it possible for political reporting get any more trivial. Clearly the campaign has gone on too.
Great job, Sherlock.

Posted by: Ed | April 3, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

i always thought he was a fraud.

Posted by: ihateobama | April 3, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

does it not show Obama speaks the truth even if his campaign does not? i thought he passed the honesty test here!

Posted by: vmj | April 3, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

He’s addicted and it’s hard to stop when you’re addicted to something (I assume this is his only addiction). I thought he was so smart though so why would he smoke when it is proven to kill you?

Posted by: jean | April 3, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

I agree with VNJ agreeing with Barb – RIGHT ON! I watched that View interview too, and he actually is charming in the excess which smacks to me as manipulation. And his talking around the Revered Wright thing: his explanations were just creative sidesteps that sounded as if he was being profound and wise, when he was really just covering his ass with untruths using his trademark pseudo “Profound Preacher-speak” to make it go down real nice. I just don’t understand why more people aren’t bringing his way of doing this to light. He lies and he character-assassinates but he does it in preacher tones that seem to mezmerize people from challenging him. He’s like a chameleon, he shifts and changes to the circumstances, and I never have felt like I’ve seen the real Obama. He’s shady, and it’s hard to put one’s finger on it exactly what it is. But Barb, “creative phraseology” that bamboozles us — that’s a good way of putting it. I want to be wrong about all this, but I’ve gotten an unsettled feeling about him for a long while now. I guess time will tell, except then we all may be stuck with him in the Oval Office, wishing we weren’t in another 8 year nightmare.

Posted by: joj | April 3, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

I am Republican that is voting in the Democratic primary for Obama. He is the easiest opponent for McCain to beat.
In order to get past the facist Democratic Gestapo, I’m going to come in unshaven, with a cig in my ear, with a button that says “Bush Lied, Now our Soldier Die”. That way I’ll be undetected from the Democrats. Oh, I amost forgot, I’ll need a forged umemployment check to show them as well.

Posted by: Will | April 3, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Well, he’d better pick a good running mate, because if Obama’s health fails, well, you know…

Posted by: Kathy | April 3, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

tennisgirl: the university of chicago issued a press release confirming that obama IS a professor there, tho he’s on leave now. the university confirms that obama told the truth, & hillary clinton was once again untruthful in misrepresenting his professional career. stop drinking the kool-aid, dear. your lady lies.

Posted by: marie burns | April 3, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Will,
Look up the word fascist in the dictionary. Then stop using words you cannot define. I’d have to weep if you weren’t so absolutely, ridiculously funny. Oh, and take a course in modern history. You’d be surprised at just how stupid you appear in print as you seem to little about history or the English language.
Obama will wipe the floor with McCain. McCain can’t even raise any money. The usual suspects who support war mongerers, the evangelical right wing nut jobs praying for the apocalypse, won’t even vote for a Repub this time. But I am sure that the wealthy friends of GWB will soon begin to chip in–you know, his base.
And yes, I believe this article was written just so the author can tell us all how he actually met Barack way back when? Must be.

Posted by: enufalreadee | April 3, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Marie,
Yes, I read U of C’s press release. It is very carefully worded. It appears to me that the U of C awards titles follwoing the same pattern as the Ivy league institution where I have made my career, which includes considerable work involving faculty appointments.
Note that the press release states that his title was for a time “Lecturer” and later “Senior Lecturer.” At no time did he have the title “Professor,” though the U of C states that he has been a lower-case “professor” at the law school.
Very diplomatic of them to save their boy’s face in this way.
Cheers.

Posted by: tennisgrl | April 3, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Being a smoker who quit and i’m sure the American public knows how hard this is, this is a non election issue.
Matter of fact his admission that he has ‘fallen off the wagon’ sometimes Makes him even more likable.At least he didn’t say he mispoke, that Bosnia story made Hillary win the liar in chief test.

Posted by: Andrew Kenneth | April 3, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Hi from your alma mater in Hanover, Jake.
My grandmother hid her 3 cigarette/day habit from her children and my grandfather until she died recently at 94. In other respects, she was honest to a fault. My guess is that Obama’s (or his campaign’s) fudging on this issue has to do with his concerns about being a role model and about his promise to his wife. It seems very…human to me. I don’t get any sort of pathological liar vibe like I do with, um, other politicians.

Posted by: Carrie | April 3, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

I mean, seriously, THIS is the “news” that needs to be reported today? As an ex-smoker myself, I spent several years trying to quit smoking and occcasionally lying about my progress to my friends and family. But don’t you think there are one or two more important things to talk about? Is it really your business if he is smoking in private? Let’s see– we are in the middle of a long, costly and apparently endless war, the other major Presidential candidate had a husband who was impeached for having sex with a subordinate in the White House and has now made $50 million from somebody, the economy is collapsing and the taxpayers are bailing out everyone in sight–but the most important thing this journalist has to talk about is whether Sen. Obama was smoking one day last fall. Amazing.

Posted by: bnaflyer | April 3, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Does somebody pay you to write this? seriously, you went ahead to sniff somebody?

Posted by: Jeff | April 3, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

you are SO olfactory!

Posted by: eli | April 3, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Partisan vitriole is exactly what occurs when bad news comes out about “our” candidate, as I wrote several days ago when I didn’t feel a blog story about HRC was to my liking.
Then there was an article about Obama that “I approved of”. I commented that “I figured the next day would probably be my and my candidate’s turn in the barrel”. Then I would probably be on the particula blog writer’s back again! The next day actually did bring more critical comment for HRC.
We are all biased in favor of “our” candidate. So when unwelcome news comes out, we tend to chastise the presenter. Such reactions are “human”. However, unless the messenger is absolutely lying and/or exhibiting a “proven bias”, we must deal with it and hope our candidate makes honst corrections re that issue. Some in the media have/and do exhibit such bias and it it obvious day after day. They are a detriment to the “process of Democracy”.
Blaming messengers, if what they say is fact based, is like blaming the person that told you a tornado was coming.
We also need to recognize that the “wind blows in different directions” everyday. Today might be a good for my candidate or yours, tomorrow may be vice-versa. Hopefully, if candidates can get a fair,yet thorough scrutiny the best candidate will emerge. We need to know as much as we can about “all” candidates, warts, flaws and all, then sort out what we can accept, from what is unacceptable to us personally.
“Addiction” is a big problem, lying about it is an additional problem it speaks to “will-power”! HRC’s stretching of the Tuzla thing was a problem, sticking by it also added to the problem. Anyone that denies such is dissembling! “Sticking our heads in the sand or going into “frenzied”denial is absurd. The issue is “what flaws do I accept in my candidate, as opposed to positive aspects and proven ability to perform despite those flaws”. Such decisions are mine to make, as they are yours.
Wrong is wrong re either candidate. If we accept certain flaws in our candidate then that is a personal decision. We should not expect everyone else to do the same thing. Politics and our vote matter to us based on our particular mind-set. It is fine to try to influence others to our views, but ridiculous to attack those we cannot. We are probably all guilty of such at some point.. When we make rebuttals, it certainly would be “Democratic” of us to try to make them with facts that we ‘personally know” to be true, based on our own best “research”. Ad-hominem, pernicious attacks weaken the argument I , you, he, she, or we wish to make, and most certainly denigrate us personally from a civility standpoint.
All I have ever asked of the media is fairness. I have never wanted and do not want anyone in the media to give my candidate “a pass”, and for sure I do not want “the opposition” to get a pass.
If we cannot deal with the truth about our candidates that is our individual probem.
Media as messengers per se are not the problem. Many within such are contemptible because of continued “one-sided” reporting. Hopefully we can all recognize those that are and avoid them.
*It surely gets old “refining” comments, as I have had to do with this one, However it is my own fault, as Jimmy B. said in “Margaritaville”. I am old, slow, and inept at blogging. Maybe one day the protocols will sink in.

Posted by: MC | April 3, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

This kind of stuff makes me want to throw up. Your acute sense of smell detected cigarette smoke – so what? Let’s swift boat him for that since Wright didn’t stick…maybe we can get Mc Cain to finish off turning the supreme court over to the neo-cons

Posted by: Kira | April 3, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

If scent was a measure of journalism, I would subscrib to Horse and Hound.Please start doing your job. Leave the “sniffing out” to man’s best friend.

Posted by: middle class lass | April 3, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

joj you are wrong.

Posted by: Dee, Washington, DC | April 3, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

The war ON Iraq? You’re tipping your hand, Jake….

Posted by: J-Dog | April 3, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Vicki, actually, you missed the point that the article made clear. Jake Tapper NEVER asked Senator Obama if he had smoked, therefore, he did not lie to him. He NEVER asked him. He simply made his own humanly flawed assumption. Clearly, not a reason to accuse the Senator for lying. And that is exactly what this is about, it is about Jake Tapper and his ego, not that Senator Obama was smoking. It sounds like Jake got his feeling hurt because Senator Obama did not give him the time of day that he the great Jake Tapper thought that he deserved.

Posted by: Dee, Washington, DC | April 3, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Obama was reported to have been sneaking some smokes on the campaign trail in Wisconsin a few weeks ago; apparently some students spotted him and wondered why he was still smoking if was publicly saying he’d quit.
I personally don’t care if he smokes. I care if he misrepresents doing it. If it goes to credibility, we all are left to wonder what else he could still be doing that he claims long ago to have quit.
At least he came clean with Chris Matthews about it.

Posted by: floridian | April 3, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Jake,
Can you do your readers a favor and find out if John Yoo smokes? It’s plainly the only way the American public can get any insight into his character.

Posted by: dr. bloor | April 3, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Jake: Good Bye.

Posted by: Errol J. Lima | April 3, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

We are involved in a deadly war in which over 4,000 Americans have died, 30-100,000 Americans have been badly maimed, in which potentially 1,000,000 Iraqis have died and approximately 4.7 million Iraqis have been displaced since the war began. Furthermore, our domestic economy is in shambles. We are trying to select a president who has the power and poise to deal with these crushing issues–and there are those who think that focusing on ONE CIGARETTE is the most important issue at hand? Are there TRULY those who think that because Obama may or may not have had a cigarette he is less qualified than Hilary? If we want to get down to a brass tacks argument, please let’s do so, for the sake of all of the dead Americans and Iraqis. Let’s debate the important differences between Clinton and Obama, and not babble on about cigarettes.

Posted by: sally | April 3, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Jake Trapper should just say he doesn’t like Obama or whatever he is trying to get at. He is so full of himself he really believes he is important enough to say he smelled smoke and some how turn this article into a question of honesty. Hey Jake when You point a finger at someone you have 3 pointing back at yourself. Why don’t you switch over to foxnews.

Posted by: what? | April 3, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

This story has Smokygate and pulitzerprize written all over it. You sure have earned your money Jake Tapper, ABC News’ Senior National Correspondent.
If only the newsworld had more courageous reporters like you, the western civilization would be a better place to live.
You must surely go to bed every night proud and content knowing that your contribution to heightening the standard of american newsculture was invaluable.
Anyway, awesome job Jake, keep it up..

Posted by: Dennis | April 3, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Dear Mr. ABC News’ Senior National Correspondent,
You write: It’s not a big deal in the scheme of things — the war on Iraq, a major economic crisis — indeed, it’s miniscule. Hardly worth mentioning YES, agreed. Except that I don’t like feeling that I wasn’t being dealt with honestly. We can relate, its clearly much like that big whopper told by Mrs. Bill Clinton about her Tuzla landing under sniper fire scenario that included a reception line with flower girl and some shopping later. And as much as citizens who are suspect of the media might scoff at such a notion [ truth, transparency, Huh? ] many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we’re confident is the right one. Excuse me, but, where was your dogged journalistic nose representing the citizenry when the Iraq war drums kept beating nationally but its epicenter based in D.C. , whrer was your gut intuition when the war profiteers and their surrogates told bold faced LIES that lead the U. S. A down into that bloody oil quagmire with friendly embedded media ? Are you still ‘confident’ that was the right path? Rather than wasting my time and yours try some real investigative reporting as to the why these War Lords in the White House haven’t as yet been impeached, [Inquiring minds want to know ] and not a writing a flimsy piece that borders on yellow journalism and worse, directing this exercise against the Man who proved to have the right stuff to stand against the intended occupation of Iraq, cigarette in hand or not!
(Corny, I know.) No, worse, Pathetic JT. No wait, I apologize, you must be trying your hand at some comic relief with all these looming, overwhelming, much too serious national issues.

Posted by: riolama | April 3, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Cigs aren’t the only thing Obama smokes. Just ask his Secret Service detail about the doobies he likes to roll on his way back to the hotels after his speeches.
Of course, it is “just to relax.”

Posted by: US Veteran | April 3, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

tennisgirl: sorry, but my husband was a tenured full professor with two endowed chairs; I know the difference between adjuncts & tenure-track. Obama was not in a tenure-track position, but UC says the “senior” attached to lecturer gives him equal status w/professors (& equal or better remuneration). such accommodations for professionals in all fields are common in academia when an individual cannot commit to full-time status & all the responsibilities that go with a full-time position. who are you going to believe? UC or HRC? no contest.

Posted by: marie burns | April 3, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

This is a ridiculous “article.”
Who cares?
Like you said, there are much more important things to worry about.
Next time I will think twice before I click a link to one of your posts.

Posted by: Jay | April 3, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Oh brother. Ok, I think what is really happening here is that you felt slighted that Obama didn’t confide in you about falling off the nicotine wagon. So you’re writing this snarky little article about it. You said yourself it was hardly worth mentioning. So why mention it? You just sound whiny.

Posted by: Megan | April 3, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Oh good heavens. You say he lied, but he admitted that it had been hard and he had slipped a few times. It is pathetic to see people have to work so hard to FIND SOMETHING.
Maybe he could make it easier on you. He could have a weekly press conference where he confesses something vile, like chewing gum in class in the third grade or not waiting 30 minutes after eating to go swimming. Then you columnists and cable news guys can rant about it all week until the next shocking confession comes out.
Get another job if this is all you can come up with during a time when Hillary STILL hasn’t turned in her 2006 income tax return and thinks the flowers and little girl in Bosnia were sniper fire.
We have a war with people getting killed and maimed, people moving out of foreclosed houses, losing jobs and dignity, and you are obsessing on how someone smelled almost a year ago?
Every time I am around other people who smoke, I come home smelling like that also. What is really smelling right now is the news media who apparently don’t have enough to do.
Get over it. He is going to be president, and will still try to make things better for you.

Posted by: lw | April 3, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

So, you didn’t ask Obama anything about smoking, you asked his campaign, who said he quit, and then he personally said he had relapsed a few times, confirming your suspicions. In other words, this is a post about Obama not lying about something that is nearly insignificant.
Well, hell, I just don’t see how anyone could vote for the man after that. A hundred years of war it is!

Posted by: Jen | April 3, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Excellent article. Obama has not been forthcoming about a lotta things. Most shockingly when he told the media his advisor never telephoned the Canadian Embassy. When the Canadian government finally fessed up, Obama didn’t look so honest.
I hope he’ll stop smoking.
He will be a terrible role model if he doesn’t.

Posted by: Jon Elliott | April 3, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I sure would hate to have a president who is a poor role model. I think it would keep me up at night knowing that the leader of the free world struggled with nicotine addiction. That plus the failure to wear a flag pin is just a recipe for disaster, and I sure would hate to see that happen after this awesome time we’ve had for 8 years.

Posted by: Mark Twain | April 3, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

why is it that the only sane candidate smokes cigarettes? i wish more of our elected officals would smoke. maybe we could get to working on some serious issues rather than these silly distractions.

Posted by: brand76 | April 3, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

“Jake Tapper is ABC News’ Senior National Correspondent based in the network’s Washington bureau.” ABC News should be entirely ashamed that he is one of their political heavyweights. I don’t care who you support, a reporter sighting his superior senses as the basis for a story goes against everything that reasonable journalism should stand for.

Posted by: Dylan | April 3, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

It’s a shame to see how people view others and how race in America is still so a “cloud ” up in the sky. Being that I’m not from this great country of America, it allows me to look “in” from the outside. I truly don’t understand the politics involved in someone smoking, is this the Only issues that America face, I mean come on people!! Wake up! This is a Great country with so much to offer, don’t let the world view this country as a loser, as it is already viewed that way. Sen. Clinton and Sen Obama are both great, formidable candidates! However Obama is a winner around the world!

Posted by: cathy | April 3, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

This is a stupid article.

Posted by: CatsMom | April 3, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Let me get this straight.
You didn’t ask Obama, you asked some staffer who didn’t know.
Later on Obama is asked directly and he admits he has had problems quitting.
and somehow you think that he was lying?
Damn, it sure would have been nice if you had spent half as much of this energy observing Bush. Sheesh

Posted by: The Other Steve | April 3, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

We have lost 4000 soldiers in Iraq, the economy is in the crapper, the housing market has tanked, we are spending trillions on this stuipd war that our President lied to get us into and this pathetic looser has the nerve to be concerned about this stupidity. Get a life people.

Posted by: Rick | April 3, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Does anyone believe every question is passed to the candidate before a campaign staffer responds? The campaign was unaware that Obama was sneaking a cigarette now and again, one would suspect, if one were reasonably able.

Posted by: Carrie | April 3, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

“Many of us consider ourselves to your representatives to make sure our leaders are telling the truth and are leading our country down a path we’re confident is the right choice.”
Do you really believe that? We both have daughters. I am passionate about the choices I make and how they will impact the America she inherits. I imagine you are as well. Those choices involve the wretched, endless war in Iraq, the atrocities my country has committed, and the people I chose to lead. They involve decisions made by an administration in my name, outlined in stark horror in the Yoo memo. In ten years or fifteen years, we’re going to have to answer for those decisions and choices- to ourselves, to the world, but most of all to our own children. Do you really think that it will matter whether Senator Obama smelled like cigarettes?
No. I didn’t think so.

Posted by: Mara | April 4, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Again it is a question of judgement. Oh but wait all he has to say is, ” it was a bonheaded mistake” and we should all be okay with it.

Posted by: mona | April 4, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Come on! It’s not your business. He’s trying to quit and that’s tough! I wish you all would focus your laser like intensity on how Bush Co. is destroying the constitution.

Posted by: FURTG | April 4, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

“Many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth”. Yeah, you’re doing a great job there, dude.

Posted by: Michael G | April 4, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

You have GOT to be kidding! Children starving to death, people being slaughtered — we can go on and on and on — and your issue is whether or not Obama had a smoke? I simply can’t believe this. Get out a flashlight because it’s dark in there where your heads are!

Posted by: DT | April 4, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

quote from obama: “i wouldn’t want them (his daughters) to be punished with a child.”
nuff said.

Posted by: so saddened | April 4, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

correction – he said he wouldn’t want his daughters to be “punished with a baby.”

Posted by: so saddened | April 4, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

As I read your post I could guess the ensuing comments that would appear below. I was not disappointed.
Your point, and I actually “got it”, was HONESTY. Personally, I wouldn’t vote for a president that smoked. I’m weird that way. But that’s not the point. The point is honesty. It’s about being who your PR says you are. I was very intrigued with Obama at first, and thought he’d be the one I’d be supporting, but seeing him off the teleprompter, I just really sensed a lack of authenticity in his campaign. The smoking revelation, among others, really confirms that feeling for me. I sometimes wonder if he hates all of this.. of having to hide who he really is.
The people that will attack even a hint of objective questioning of Obama are beginning to slip into the realm of cultists.

Posted by: Diana | April 4, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

And you call yourself a reporter? What a non-issue!
Let’s see–you smelled tobacco on Obama’s person and asked if he smoked. He said yes, yet you say he lied. Duh!

Posted by: Michael Nolan | April 4, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

This is why I think Obama should not do anymore interviews or debates with ABC. It is clear that they have a mission to destroy his candidacy. The fact that this reporter is trying to tie the fact that he smelled of cigarette smoke to he must have had a cigarette is stupid. First of all, he could have been around people who were smoking. I doubt very seriously that he would choose to puff on cigarettes right before an interview with a reporter. The fact that this reporter called the campaign office to ask an aide if Obama was smoking a cigarette is obnoxious. The aide isn’t in the position to answer that question. Obama said that he was trying to quit, that he has fallen off of the wagon a couple of times–that doesn’t make him a liar. Many people struggling with an addition to cigarettes, food,alcohol etc. find that they may fall off the wagon a time or two before completely kicking the habit.

Posted by: Sheryl | April 4, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

So he was sneaking a smoke, his campaign didn’t know about it, and this indicates dishonesty? What the hell is wrong with you?
Why didn’t you just ask him directly?

Posted by: zsa | April 4, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

I support Obama. I voted for him in the primary.
A lie is a lie. If Obama lies in small things, he will probably hedge on the large things. If a cigarette messes up his image and you smelled it on him while he later denies it, then I get a clearer picture of where he is going.
I don’t think he should get a pass on the Canadian story either. If there is a pattern to his lies, we can know what to expect when he is in office and he has our fate in his hands.
I don’t think making the argument that all politicians stretch the truth is good enough. If you or other reporters give us the basis for his lying or any politician’s lies (I still chuckle at the amount of honesty David Patterson is giving NY right now), then we know more than we did.

Posted by: Genna | April 4, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

This is news? I can’t wait for this election to be over so we can talk about the real friggen issues important to people and not whether or not a smoker fell of the wagon.

Posted by: Felicia | April 4, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Ok, Marie, I’m not going to quibble with you about the distinctions between Lecturers and Professors. We both know what they are.
My point is simply that there seems to be a tendency to embellish that strikes me as unnecessary and therefore manipulative.
I don’t hear anyone questioning whether Obama might have had a tenured professorship at U of Chicago had he wanted one. I’m certainly not questioning his qualifications for that job. I just wonder why he said he and been a “professor.” The Lecturers at the university where I work (one equal in reputation to U of Chicago) would not within earshot of a tenured or tenure-track professor refer to themselves as “professors” because the distinctions are so obvious and so important in the university community.
Similarly, why call a political science major a “degree in international relations”?

Posted by: tennisgrl | April 4, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Somebody that thinks can get away with white lies will try to get away with big lies, it is proven that Obama is a liar a few times. He has a craving for deceiving the voters. I don’t trust that guy.

Posted by: Persio | April 4, 2008, 5:01 am 5:01 am

Everything about Obama is fake. You just can’t trust him.

Posted by: Brad | April 4, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we’re confident is the right one.
Oh PLEASE! The MSM has rolled over for the Bush regime time after time.

Posted by: Steve J. | April 4, 2008, 5:34 am 5:34 am

Perhaps everyone should have read the top of the page before engaging in such outré verbal acrobatics over this article. “Power, pop, and probings from ABC News National …” is how the site is billed. Nowhere does it imply that it is to be interpreted as a scholarly, political journal-like screed. It’s clearly an anecdotal article with Mr. Tapper’s interpretation of the story’s significance. For him, it seems to be a matter of being dealt with honestly, not Obama’s smoking habit.
If you don’t like the topic, express it in a less offensive way. Heck, I don’t always like the subjects that Mr. Tapper writes about. I supported John Edwards, and I didn’t always consider Tapper’s assessment of him as objective and fair. But, I didn’t curse or becoming personally attacking over it.
However, a significant number of Obama supporters become very confrontational with name-calling, vicious diatribes, etc. in their disagreement over an article, blog post, or even another comment. It certainly doesn’t make a case for attracting further Obama supporters. I used to think that these types of comments were made by the politically uninitiated, but even formerly informative blogs like TPM have become political cauldrons. What has happened to people during this primary?

Posted by: tessablue | April 4, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am

Is Obama still smoking while hiding and denying it?

I’ve written very recently of my sympathy for Sen. Obama’s difficulty in trying to quit his cigarette habit. It literally took a heart attack three years ago to get me to stop, and even so, the last time I had a craving for a cigarette was … oh, abou…

Posted by: BeldarBlog | April 4, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

tennisgirl: obama calls himself a professor because (a) UC says he is & (b) a lot of people wouldn’t have a clue what a ‘senior lecturer’ is. they might think it’s an old guy who yells at the neighborhood kids — you know, like mccain.

Posted by: marie burns | April 4, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am

As a smoker, I can tell you honestly that it is no surprise Obama lied about this. He is an addict and will always be an addict. Nicotine is one nasty drug. I feel his pain, having quit so many times myself. But I find this example revealing. I don’t fault him as a man…quitting is incredibly difficult. But to think and act like no one else can smell it on you…that is an addict’s delusional state. So, I have to ask myself…is it just the cigarettes that made him act this way or is this a glimpse of him, man or politician, at his core….well, I don’t have any faith in him and this story hasn’t done anything to sway me one way or the other. But all you people on the fence…think, people, think.

Posted by: debbie | April 4, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am

This is the same person that is against smoking but perfectly alright with abortion.

Posted by: Dave | April 4, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

I can’t believe Obama votes and holds fund raisers for partial birth abortion.
Hillary, Kennedy and Kerry don’t support this horrible killing of baby Americans.
Once a baby can breath on their own, they are Americans. How can anyone vote for someone that would support killing fellow baby Americans?

Posted by: starbuck1979 | April 4, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

I’m a Clinton supporter but I’m not going to bash Obama if he fell off the wagon when it came to quitting smoking. It’s not uncommon. The stress of the campaign has to be tough and people who smoke or did smoke know that a cigarette craving can get the best of you.
I wouldn’t stop supporting Obama for this. Of course I have other reasons for not supporting him, lots of other reasons…but being human isn’t one of them.
I wanted to like Obama, I did like Obama until I started to see the hypocracy of how he lives his life and what he says in his speeches. The Press created a myth, I guess it was human that he just let it happen? He’s just a typical politician, a man not a Saint or Savior.

Posted by: dev | April 4, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Seriously? This is what you write about? Seriously? My god, you are contacting his campaign to ask if he maybe smoked when you ran into him. At no point in this article do I see any indication Obama himself lied to you. Now, why don’t you go figure out why Hillary and Bill are going around telling people she tried to join the Army/Marines.

Posted by: chris | April 4, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Good post, tessablue. I’m beginning to think this is the South Park generation and we’re worse off for it.

Posted by: Vnd | April 4, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

“many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we’re confident is the right one.”
that’s a friggin whopper if there ever was one.

Posted by: waylon | April 4, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Just another lie he is caught with. The point was, why lie about it in the first place. Obama is a great speaker and he knows how to say what you want to hear, depends I guess on what you want to hear. Depends on what group of people he’s talking to as how he answers ANY question. Just another typical polititian trying to get into office.

Posted by: Susan | April 4, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Yes, he’s just a mortal politician after all…MSNBC hasn’t gotten word yet though. They think he’s the Messiah.
The man believes killing babies is a fine and wants to give licenses to illegals which are much more troubling. Not to mention his and his wife’s lack of patriotism towards our great contry.

Posted by: MSG | April 4, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

“Except that I don’t like feeling that I wasn’t being dealt with honestly. And as much as citizens who are suspect of the media might scoff at such a notion, many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we’re confident is the right one.”
What is this a joke? In these times with all that has transpired you make a statements like this? How is one supposed to take this.

Posted by: newdome | April 4, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

He lied because he can. And no one calls him on it.
He lied because he knows people think badly of a rich, educated person who cannot break himself of the smoking habit, which is known to be bad for you, and because he knows there are people whose opinion of him are impacted by his smoking. (And yes, I know people who have said this.)
But lying about this was idiotic. And it shows a smallness of character and a lack of courage that should serve as an alarm bell to others.
One last thing — if Clinton had been caught in a lie like this — one Obama supporters are calling inconsequential, as are ALL matters in which the chosen one does not sport his halo — she’s be eviscerated.

Posted by: Beth | April 4, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

“many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we’re confident is the right one.”
that’s a friggin whopper if there ever was one.
I second that. a self important one at that. If you think you’re a representative for public interest, maybe you should be more concerned about lies to the public and not trivialities like this.

Posted by: Johannes | April 4, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

HAS OBAMA BROUGHT WHITE AND BLACKS TOGETHER WITH HIS CAMPAIGN?
TOGETHER 30%
FURTHER APART 22%
MADE NO DIFFERENCE 42%
When you add apart and no difference it is 64%. And the numbers will get larger and larger. Obama is a divider.

Posted by: starbuck1979 | April 4, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

The correct response would have been, “Yes, I smoke” Now lets move on to something that’s actually important.
The fact that the media has placed such significance on it, should tell you a lot about what’s really important to the media. It has nothing to do with qualifications for the job.
I don’t have a horse in this race.
Clinton & Obama, are both socialists.
OH wait, sorry, now they’re calling it “progressive”. It’s certainly a more pallatable term, so.. my mistake.
McCain is out of touch with reality.
Are these three really the best America has to choose from?
Sad.

Posted by: Bill | April 4, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

The “war on Iraq” ended in April, 2003, nearly five years ago.
We won.

Posted by: William Z. | April 4, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

This is a ridulous story. Obama has the right to smoke if he wants to. He is in the fight of his life and needs a smoke occasionally to ease the tension of dealing with Hillary Clinton!

Posted by: Jan | April 4, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Okay, so maybe he did lie about having a smoke. Big whoop! An addiction is hard to quit no matter what it is, eating, drinking, smoking. I’d rather he lie about harming himself than lying about being shot at by Bosnian snipers. Also, not once did the author state that Obama himself told him he didn’t have a cigarette. So, was he actually lied to?

Posted by: Tracy | April 4, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Are we serious? Smoking?
Smoking is one of the most difficult things for your body to give up physiologically and psychologically. It is also something that millions of Americans struggle with. I applaud him for making an effort.
With him being a role model, I do not expect him to come out and say how much he enjoys ciggarettes, its a bad example for kids especially.
Should he have been more honest, despite the fact that some clown would make an issue out of it? Certainly. No lie is good.
Is whether or not Obama smokes important? Absolutely not.
There are far more important Lies and half truths out there to cover. If this is an honesty issue, this is far less important than lying about the experience you’ve run your campaign on. (Clinton) Which in turn is far less important than lying to conflate Iran with iraq (McCain)
Lets get real people.

Posted by: sd | April 4, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Come on. I’ve eaten in places and have come out smelling like smoke.
And no, I’ve never smoked in my life.

Posted by: ollie | April 4, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

When all is said and done, I’m sure history will remember Obama’s campaign as the dirtiest ever, punctuated by the cover of “clean” but painting the Clintons as racist clearly crossed the line. He lies a lot, but seriously, of all the reasons he shouldn’t be President, not that it could happen, McCain will clobber him in Dukakis fashion, but smoking just isn’t it. The media need cover the growing list of lies from his team an uncover the charlatan he is and the dirty machine running him, though it might expose the dirty Democratic establishment pushing him, but not this. Yes, I am a Republican. I eagerly await the Obama nomination, I was originally worried we’d lose this year, but it looks like the Dems are going to give us one of the greatest gifts in elections history, Barack Obama.

Posted by: Jenny | April 4, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Whatever, I bet he never inhaled….lol.

Posted by: Bob Sloggin | April 4, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

They pay you to write this crap?
“Obama ran off before I could ask him if he’d just snuck a smoke, so I called his campaign.”
What kind of investigative reporting is this? Seems more like tabloid to me…Maybe you should follow up with an interview with his alien brother from Mars who secretly has a love-child with Britney Spears…really…

Posted by: ron | April 4, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

“Still.”
Still what? You are lied to about Iraq, about torture, about any number of issues important for our nation, and that’s fine. Oh, but let Obama MAYBE fib (and it wasn’t him, it was his campaign staff) about sneaking a smoke and that gets you all hot and bothered. How trivial and debased can you be? Seriously, do you think your job is just to play “gotcha” regarding candidate’s personal peccadillos?
Also, comparing Obama and McCain in terms of helath concern is absurd. Obama is 46, never had a health problem, whereas McCain is 72 and has been diagnosed with cancer (melanoma is mild one, but inusrance companies still consider that cancer – I have a friend who can’t get insurance because she had melanoma). So yes, it is reasonable to be concerned about McCain’s health, not so much for Obama.

Posted by: The Frito Pundito | April 4, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

We all lie a little, especially when we fail to live up to the standards we have set for ourselves. This would be a big deal if Obama based part of his candidacy on the inner strength he exhibited while quitting smoking. This would be a big deal if Obama used quitting smoking as an example of an experience that qualifies him to lead. Why is this a story?

Posted by: Tulthunderhead | April 4, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

As someone who has quit smoking, I can tell you that suits can reek for years, even after cleaning, and it’s especially noticeable outside and in smoke-free environments. Also, one snuck cigarette a week prior can still cling to the suit.
Third, every time I stood near someone who was smoking, the (delightful to me) fragrance stuck to me, and later that evening my wife would accuse me of sneaking a smoke.
I don’t think you were lied to. I also understand how hard it is to quit and that one can’t give up just because one makes mistakes.

Posted by: Amos | April 4, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Molehill politics.

Posted by: Gernab | April 4, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

How dare you accuse Blessed Barack of lying? Can’t you at least use euphemisms? Such as prevaricating, stretching the truth, etc…
The extent to which Obama fans come to his defense on the smoking is ridiculous.
I never smoked; my father did. I understand how difficult it (apparently) is, to kick the habit. That itself should be explanation enough. But oh no, The Barack cannot be tarnished with a blemish. the staff has to protect him, lying if necessary, in the greater cause.

Posted by: Krishna | April 4, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Amos,
People have seen Obama smoking backstage and outside before a event. He is also known for hitting up staff members for cigs. He is chain smoker who has no self control. He has no judgment to be president.

Posted by: starbuck1979 | April 4, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

“I’m a Clinton supporter but I’m not going to bash Obama if he fell off the wagon when it came to quitting smoking. It’s not uncommon.”
You are missing the point.
The point here is not that Obama couldn’t break the habit, but that he/his campaign lied about it.
Similarly, in the Rev Wright issue, the point is not what the Rev said, but that Obama sat listening to that for 20 years, and finally when the pastor was (persuaded to) quit, he comes out with an explanation that “had he not retired, I would have quit”.
He is very clever in morphing an issue into something else, and addressing that instead.
As someone else on this forum said, “Obama says whatever he thinks will work at the moment”. The strange thing is he is getting away with it for so long. One of these days, his “Acquired Immunity from Criticism” will wear out and he will start unravelling. Too bad if it happens after he clinches the nomination.

Posted by: Krishna | April 4, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

The candidate didn’t lie, his campaign staffers didn’t know he was off the wagon.

Posted by: Carrie | April 4, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Yeah, come on guys, it’s not like his wife cheated on him, and he forgave her, and now he wants to be president.
And it’s not like Rev. Wright is out there lobbying to ship more jobs to another hemisphere or anything. Lighten up.

Posted by: Mike | April 4, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

character and strength is needed to stop an addiction….and good judgement to avoid the habit in the first place.

Posted by: elgarbanzo | April 4, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Thank you, Jake. This does bother me. Why would Obama have to lie about it? He is slowly revealing his true self in these moments. For someone who said words do matter he’s been very flippant about Wright & Farrakhan – it does matter whether he denounces & rejects Farrakhan. Most of the media keeps fawning over him but why did he vote present 129 times in Illinois & why would someone with such great judgment make deals with Rezko? He’s gotten nothing accomplished in the US Senate & only did a few things when the Illinois Senate went Democrat.
Why does he think he’s the person to lead a national conversation on race when he’s been supporting a racist bigot who spews hate speech for the past 20 years.
What we need is real legislative accomplishments, not empty calls for hope & change from a hypocrit.

Posted by: PW | April 4, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Barack’s petty lies are not important or unique, they are part and parcel of the “holier than thou” syndrome among politicians.
What is of really significant importance in this presidential race, is the admitted conviction of both his and his wife’s toward this country and the ruling majority. First Mrs. Barack: the fact that she did not consider her opportunity to be schooled in two Ivy-league institutions and the chance for being a successful partner in a law firm as a reflection of the privilege and opportunities she was afforded with by this country, of which she could be proud of, tells us a great deal about her character. Plus the fact that for a long period of time, with her intelligence and culture, she did not find it offensive to belong to a church and be close friend of a man who calls himself a “pastor”, and who is also a close friend and admirer of a hateful and “dictator-like” little punk with bow-ties, tells you more. Furthermore, a mother, who did not consider it brainwashing with hate of her small children, exposed to the same pastor’s speeches, during a long time, she has no place in the White House in my book.
Now, back to the candidate himself. Obama with his excellent mind, intellect, great capacity to deliver heartwarming and glorious speeches and world-saving promises, did not have either the courage to contradict his religious guide and friend for twenty years in either convincing him to modify his teachings,(a pastor is a “teacher” or not?) or enough courage to simply leave that church for one that dedicates itself to “religion” and not politics. Secondly, here is a man, who wishes to ride to fame by promising so much to all, sinners and saints in and out of the country, to deal with petty dictators like Castro, Chavez, Hsu, and their elk, as well as good and great leaders alike, simply because he dreams of being an enlightened knight on a white horse? Where has he been all his life, living in a dream world, an imaginary land where simply because he went to great schools, delivers great speeches, they will all bow to him? Give me a break, to paraphrase a TV journalist. Sounds like he is a great dreamer, just like the bright Chamberlain of the U.K. was, if anybody remembers him.
A man, no matter how intelligent and cultured and “handsome” he might be, should never be considered as a leader of this country who has demonstrated such poor judgment in his personal life.

Posted by: gabred | April 4, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

We’ve been lied into an illegal war, and continue to be lied to about our economy, foreign policy and all other aspects of our lives as Americans, Clinton lies about Iraq War votes and her trip to Bosnia under sniper fire, and McCain lies on a regular basis about his intentions on both the domestic and international fronts, and you’re upset because Barak Obama snuck a smoke? Get over yourself, please.

Posted by: junior | April 4, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

This is what they pay you for? Seriously?

Posted by: Lisa | April 4, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

“Except that I don’t like feeling that I wasn’t being dealt with honestly.”
Obama probably said “Good to see you Jake.” Think about that one Mr. Intrepid Reporter Guy.

Posted by: Righteous Bubba | April 4, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

This is a joke, right? An elaborate, albeit belated April Fools prank? That you even *bothered* to ask such a piffling question of Obama’s staff is puzzling enough. But to see the incident as being illustrative of anyone’s character is absurd. Dollars to doughnuts Obama knew nothing about this little exchange. Imagine it: “Senator, I know you’re very busy running to be leader of the free world, but we’ve been asked to confirm why you smell funny.”

Posted by: ThorsonWelles | April 4, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

“Obama ran off before I could ask him if he’d just snuck a smoke…”
“Except that I don’t like feeling that I wasn’t being dealt with honestly.”
How were you not dealt with honestly? You never had time to ask him personally. Never mind, this is great reporting in action, an intense story, on the same level as the NYT bowling story. Yet, another “political reporter” showing his great talent and ability to undercover some serious truths

Posted by: Vero | April 4, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Yo people, don’t you see what’s happening here. This man doesn’t care about the truth. He is just sitting back and watching you all tear each other apart over a pastor and a bosnia trip while the dollar goes down the drain and a few more soldiers die in Iraq. Tomorrow he might say that Clinton/Obama/McCain uses double-ply toilet paper when in fact he/she has claimed to use only single-ply! And he/she doesn’t even fold it … oh the horror.

Posted by: something_smells_fishy | April 4, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Hey people if you ever smoke before you will remember how addictive nicotine is . Sometimes you think you are done with it but suddenly you find you are back at it.
More than mere wishes . it takes a strong will . its often a medical case .
But i believe this is too personal to worry about . its minuscule in relation to bigger issues and i wouldn’t worry so much about it . the smoking or non smoking . Barrack is human afterall . He perhaps thought he was done with smokeing and said so . but like many addictions it might come back i would be more worried about drug addiction or other similar issues. let him be and i believe he is capable of fixing this later along the line . its his life

Posted by: addy-ef4orts | April 4, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Bad judgement gets you into a bad marriage where your spouse messes around on you over and over and over—-
Character and strength are needed to stand up for yourself and your daughter and all the women you want to respresent and leave the good for nothing Bill Clinton!

Posted by: missouri gal | April 4, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

“One last thing — if Clinton had been caught in a lie like this — one Obama supporters are calling inconsequential, as are ALL matters in which the chosen one does not sport his halo — she’s be eviscerated.”
oh that’s right–because Hillary Clinton doesn’t lie–she only “mis-speaks” about things like sniper fire.
What kind of crap is this supposed story? Why don’t you report some real news?

Posted by: Me | April 5, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Nicotine is an addiction and is a sign of great dependency. Dependent people scare me. Lying about it is a sneaky thing to do. Also a sign of denial. I want a strong, emotionally sound, upfront leader not a sneaky addict who can’t stop smoking. Anyone who still smokes in light of the great medical evidence that it is a killer, has a serious reality problem. Just another sign that Senator Obama has issues. Maybe not a big deal to some, but it is to me. Thanks for the story.

Posted by: Alma | April 5, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

I don’t know about Obama’s funny smell but all these folks who claim they used to admire Obama up until world class journalism from abc revealed “the true dimension of his character” are blowing some serious smoke. And it doesn’t have a funny smell, it stinks!

Posted by: red mpls | April 5, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

I really thought this was a joke.
Americans are so stupid, they hate who they’re told to hate. FOX tells you to hate Obama and you obey like robots.
You don’t deserve a good president.

Posted by: Blary Fnorgin | April 5, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Are you kidding me with this story? How immature…there’s a war in Iraq…innocent people dying…talk about that. And maybe the last time he wore the suit was when he smoked and it hadn’t been dry cleaned. Do you guys ever quit with the Obama bashing?

Posted by: George | April 5, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

I’m trying to quit myself….it’s VERY hard to do…..all this talk about cigarettes makes me REALLY want one…..Sorry….that’s the end of my comment…..I have to go light one up!

Posted by: towbeezgrl | April 5, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

this is a joke, right?

Posted by: Kirk Olson | April 5, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

Baby steps….
Now try looking into all the other lies and posting them here and it might actually look like you are being a journalist.
Geez…the man lies as much as Hillary does.
And the Republicans have no probelm seeing what a ‘glass jaw’ Obama has…when they finally have their way with him I wonder if the ‘fainters’ are going to be able to contain themselves?

Posted by: It'll be Pres McCain if Obama is nom | April 5, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

So what if he smokes, we have had presidents lie about things worse than that. Why don’t you write about something worth talking about like how we have thousands of people losing their lives everyday due to lies and how their families are coping with their losses. Oh yeah, ask them how they feel about Obama’s possibly lying about smoking and see the reactions you’ll get.

Posted by: CJ | April 5, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

I am stunned that whether Obama smoked a cigarette or not could influence someone in their voting.
A feeling, but not proof, that someone in his campaign may have misled the reporter (or made an honest mistake)is really not a consideration when the stakes are this high and Political corruption particularly in the GOP is more openly defiant than ever before.
Americans will end up with the president they deserve,

Posted by: Jim Maclean | April 5, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

So, here’s the way I see it.
Obama:
“I admit, I have fallen off the wagon a couple of times and then gotten back on”
+
“Smelled like smoke” one day last year.
Hillary:
“I was afraid for my life [because of the sniper fire over my head].”
+
Wife of “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.”

Posted by: Russ | April 5, 2008, 5:24 am 5:24 am

people who take the moral high ground when it comes to smoking had better examine their own lives very closely. this means you, people like commenter Alma — so painfully self-righteous! take the plank out of your own eye, church lady! do you drink coffee every morning? do you eat too much? (if you are an american, odds are good you do – far too much.) do you ever walk anywhere or use public transport, or do you always have to take your car? addiction is addiction — very few people can claim to not be dependent on anything to get by. an addiction is an addiction. society has just decided that are just more heinous than others.

Posted by: david | April 5, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

I don’t mind him smoking at all , but not in my house Not in the White house , it’s public property. and he keeps leaving the Ovam office to get a puff in the Rose garden who is minding the store?
He is a chain smoker and of a need of an ashray nest to him for one. If he smokes in his office why would not others smoke in theirs. Its a huge problem. We need to reevaluate our laws.

Posted by: rachel | April 5, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

The American Cancer should endorse Obama to help him dealt this nasty habit.Maybe he quits for votes

Posted by: rachel | April 5, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Sad to see so many mean-spirited attacks on you, Jake. Of course, you have a sense of proportion on these things, despite the hateful comments. Your point clearly is that a candidate who will lie about something small will also lie about something big. And that point is well taken, and has been demonstrated to be true in other contexts.

Posted by: Mister Snitch | April 5, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

THIS is something you people are giving serious thought to?? And you’re trying to tie this guy having a cigarette into his character?? Are ya NUTS??
If this is what passes for political discourse, and you people vote, then we get what we deserve. Except there are a lot of us who don’t deserve people like you even having the right to vote, if a cigarette can influence you.
The dumbing down of America is now complete. Guess that means McCain will win by a landslide.

Posted by: Ron | April 5, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Gabred said: “to deal with petty dictators like Castro, Chavez, Hsu, and their elk”
erm… Chavez is not a dictator – internationally observed elections took place and were deemed fully fair. Read up and stop repeating the BS spouted by the American press.
Also, I don’t believe any of them own any elk (or did you mean ilk?), but that is as inconsequential as to whether Barack wanted to admit to his smoking (which he did do anyway).

Posted by: vote | April 5, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Wow talk about a petty, pointless story.
Let me get this straight: you called the Obama campaign to ask them to ask him if he had a cigarette? And this is relevant HOW?
Aw, I understand your feelings were hurt because of a perceived slight (that the campaign wasn’t completely honest with you). About the Senator quitting smoking.
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is running around telling pointed stories about dodging sniper fire (which were confirmed to be false), and now we hear that her favorite health care stump speech is also made of similarly fictional threads.
I’ve not had the chance to read any of your other musings this campaign season, but I must say that this article leaves a horrible first impression on someone not familiar with your work.

Posted by: Will | April 5, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

As much as I hate smoking, I have to admit that it does make you look cool. Barack has charisma no doubt, and it reminds me a lot of James Dean and his persona of being cool and authentic. Barack’s smoking habit is a definite flaw, but perhaps it keeps him human and keeps us from elevating the man too high on a pedestal. His positive energy and constant message of hope is a lot more sincere than the smoke the other candidates blow in our face every election cycle.

Posted by: David Donar | April 5, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

What hasn’t Obama lied about?

Posted by: seah | April 6, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

This typical american
Discussions are not about esentials ike healthcare-mortgage disasters-iraq. V But about whether obama did smoke another cigarette the other day.
No I understand why America is loosing leadership in the world

Posted by: lex olivier | April 6, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Hold on a minute…you’re claiming that Barack Obama was lying to you- because 1) you had a close personal encounter with him and noticed that he smelled as if he had just smoked a cigarette; and 2) you later called his campaign office, and they claimed that Obama hadn’t had a cigarette since last February?
Four points: 1) Obama did not lie to you about his tobacco use- you never even asked him the question. 2) The Obama campaign office that you did query about his tobacco use is not in the business of continual monitoring of the success of his attempts to quit tobacco, or any relapses in that struggle. It would certainly be exceptional if they were. 3) Even if the person speaking to you on the phone about Sen. Obama’s personal habits knew about his relapse and lied to you about it- it was their lie, not Sen. Obama’s. It wasn’t even a lie publically disseminated by “the Obama campaign”, in regard to a position of public policy. If it was a knowing lie- and you’ve provided little reason to assume that it was- the exclusive responsibility for it resides with the person who answered the phone. 4) Sen. Obama answered candidly and truthfully about his problems quitting tobacco, when queried about it in a public interview.
I don’t get your high moral dudgeon.
But, as long as we’re on the topic of substance use and addiction- next time you see him, why not ask John McCain how his status as son-in-law to one of the largest alcohol distributors in Arizona affects his views on drug prohibition and substance abuse? At least that’s a matter of public policy.
People upset about Sen. Obama’s tobacco use and its possible effect on his ability to govern ought to pick a biography or autobiography of Winston Churchill. Consider this excerpt from Wikipedia:
“On one occasion during an election campaign Churchill was speaking in a church hall in rural England. The hall was decorated in the well accepted colour scheme of that era – mission brown up to shoulder height, then cream up to and including the ceiling. When he finished his speech Churchill called for questions. The first came from a middle-aged woman dressed in country tweeds. “Mr Churchill, I am a member of the Temperance League,” she said, “My local branch has been examining your use of alcohol. Are you aware Prime Minister that, during your lifetime to date you have consumed enough alcohol to fill this hall up to here” stretching her arm dramatically to indicate the mission brown zone on the wall. “We want to know what you intend to do about it?” Churchill looked at the woman, followed her arm to the top of the mission brown zone, and then slowly allowed his gaze to move up through the cream zone to the ceiling. “So little time, so much to do” he said.”

Posted by: cabdriver | April 6, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Come on, man. Usually, i do think you have worthwhile stories to report, and that you do so more than competently.
But this? Not only was it none of your business, it was petty.

Posted by: Ryan | April 6, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Beyond the spurious claim currently being spun and spread far and wide by Machine Republicans that “Obama lied” about his quitting tobacco, as a result of the tacit innuendo in your report-
consider the importance and relevance of tobacco use to statesmanship:
Churchill and FDR were smokers.
Hitler was a non-smoker.
I wouldn’t make too much of it, if I were you.
yt, cabdriver (non-smoker)

Posted by: Robert D. Reed | April 6, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

“And as much as citizens who are suspect of the media might scoff at such a notion, many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we’re confident is the right one.”
Very idealistic and commendable; IF indeed all ya’ll at the mainstream media did do that! I think we know that you guys, “our representatives”, have been sleeping at the wheel. Lazy, me thinks?
Why don’t you guys get off your butts and do some REAL journalism, investigative and informative? No wonder no one watches network news anymore!

Posted by: Cooper | April 6, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Posted by: mark | April 6, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

It’s probably all the stress from having nosy journalists sniff his every move..

Posted by: anony | April 7, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

How utterly pathetic of you to call someone’s honour into question in this way! Neither did he lie to you, nor, if that’s the way you ‘follow up’ on an informal chat, did you deserve to be talking with him in the first place. And you’re wasting people’s time if that’s all you can rustle up and you’re actually in Washington…’As any close friend or family member can attest,I have an unusually keen sense of smell…blah, blah, blah’.

Posted by: Patrick Jackson | April 7, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Wow. How trivial can you get?
Well, the master of trivia, Justin Webb, North American Editor for the BBC, LINKED this “life-threatening” story on his BBC website blog. Check out the April 3 entry as well.
I tell my European friends about Santa Cruz, CA, which has a “public” smoking ban … no smoking on the sidewalk, parks, middle of the street. Is this still true? Was it ever true?
Being from Boulder, CO, I believed it. Plenty of granola-fascists in the new L.A., Colorado’s front range. Smoking on the street one day, a woman approached me, shaking her head and waggling her finger. “Shame!” she said. I checked my clothes to make sure I wasn’t wearing any fur (not than I own any, but I thought “Shame!” was PETA’s). I was confused … until I noticed her spinning eyes fixing a bead the tiny bit of hellfire in my hand. Where there’s smoke, there’s a devil.
The woman informed me it was ILLEGAL to smoke in Boulder — even outside on the street. I told her it was not (it isn’t — yet), moved away from her and thought GEEEZ. Boulder’s becoming Santa Cruz.
How precious can we get? Sure, I wish I’d never started (which, by the way, was what Obama advised) but all the same, when did lighting a cigarette become an occasion for a Citizen Arrest? Worse yet … an indicator of a hopelessly weak character? This is silly. We all have addictions. My sisters can’t live without SSRIs. I prefer tobacco. I’ve loved and trusted many smokers, my mother among them. She lived to 78.
I’m curious. How does dissembling compare to smoking? Is there a 12-step program for compulsive cover-uppers? Compulsive exaggerators? Compulsive missionaries?

Posted by: Another Greta, the one teaching in the Czech Republic | April 7, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

To Geevil, and all others who have complained about trivial reporting: Bravo!
Should we be wondering about the editors as well? The bosses who send these guys out to “smoke out” and promote … distractions?
Whatever happened to the good old-fashioned NEWS DESK?
I am so tired of being talked down to … by the President, by the Vice-President, by the Fourth Estate.
To the Editors: We are begging for more. We promise we’ll read, listen and contribute what we can. But please … if there is no dirt for the day, why not use the space to present issues?
I suppose the days of a professional press are over. Along with the Executive branch murdering habeas corpus, the loss of an intelligent press corp is the final nail in the coffin of Emerson’s America.

Posted by: Another Greta, the one teaching in the Czech Republic | April 7, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

*I removed the link to the BBC, in case that is why you won’t post this comment.
Wow. How trivial can you get?
Well, the master of trivia, Justin Webb, North American Editor for the BBC, LINKED this “life-threatening” story on his BBC website blog. Check out the April 3 entry as well. What strikes you?
I tell my European friends about Santa Cruz, CA, which has a “public” smoking ban … no smoking on the sidewalk, parks, middle of the street. Is this still true? Was it ever true?
Being from Boulder, CO, I believed it. Plenty of granola-fascists in the new L.A., Colorado’s front range. Smoking on the street one day, a woman approached me, shaking her head and waggling her finger. “Shame!” she said. I checked my clothes to make sure I wasn’t wearing any fur (not than I own any, but I thought “Shame!” was PETA’s). I was confused … until I noticed her spinning eyes fixing a bead the tiny bit of hellfire in my hand. Where there’s smoke, there’s a devil.
The woman informed me it was ILLEGAL to smoke in Boulder — even outside on the street. I told her it was not (it isn’t — yet), moved away from her and thought GEEEZ. Boulder’s becoming Santa Cruz.
How precious can we get? Sure, I wish I’d never started (which, by the way, was what Obama advised) but all the same, when did lighting a cigarette become an occasion for a Citizen Arrest? Worse yet … an indicator of a hopelessly weak character? This is silly. We all have addictions. My sisters can’t live without SSRIs. I prefer tobacco. I’ve loved and trusted many smokers, my mother among them. She lived to 78.
I’m curious. How does dissembling compare to smoking? Is there a 12-step program for compulsive cover-uppers? Compulsive exaggerators? Compulsive missionaries?

Posted by: Another Greta, the one teaching in the Czech Republic | April 7, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

“Not a big deal in the scheme of things” “Hardly worth mentioning” “Not that Sens. Hillary Clinton and John McCain or their campaigns are entirely innocent in this area either. Or even that Obama is the worst offender.” “Still.”
But I just CAN’T write about McCain’s lies. He invites us to barbecues. My corporate-media boss says don’t criticize him, so here’s another shallow column about our opponents – I mean McCain’s, McCain’s!

Posted by: AndyRP | April 7, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Sen. Obama made quitting smoking a campaign issue when he publicly announced he was quitting because his wife insisted he do so if he wanted to run for President. He even joked that if anyone saw him smoking to tell Michelle. Even though I voted for him, I was, and am, troubled by his addiction. First, Sen. Obama downplayed the extent of his addiction, stating that he smoked very little. Yet months later he is still unable to wean himself off nicotine. Second, I find it hard to believe an intelligent person would not be more motivated by the threat smoking poses to their own health than by how it is perceived by voters. Third, while Sen. Obama supports raising Federal cigarette taxes and FDA oversight of tobacco products, he, unlike Edwards, Biden, and Dodd, has rejected calls for a national smoke-free workplace law.
Finally, for those who think this issue is inconsequential, I would point out that smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the US. It kills more Americans than AIDS, illegal drugs, murder, suicide, and car crashes combined. It results in billions of dollars in health care costs, a large percentage of which is borne by taxpayers. It is estimated that smoking will kill a billion people worldwide this century. To imply that smoking is not, or should not, be an important issue is uninformed. 438,000 Americans dead each year from smoking stacks up rather well against the death toll from the Iraqi war.

Posted by: Keith | April 7, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Why is this an issue?
Has our media really stooped to this point?

Posted by: Dan | April 7, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

You know what this is bizzare so he smoked a cigarette big deal, would it be better if he were drinking and driving like our bush has done in the past, and lord only knows if he was when those nuclear-warhead components wound up in Taiwan, write some real stuff some serious things like what the media just brushed under the rug so fast, with this nuclear-warhead compenets
in Taiwan thats IMPORTANT news not a cigarette.

Posted by: America | April 7, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

I don’t know how I missed this smoking issue. I admit it has a serious effect on how I feel about Barack. As a matter of fact, after being 100% behind Barack since the speech he gave announcing his candidacy, I don’t think I can vote for him if he’s still smoking. It’s a blow to learn he ever did. My argument is “how smart CAN you be to start smoking EVER.” That is my policy for everyone. I’m very disapointed.

Posted by: Bill Janis | April 8, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

“…many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth…” about stupid meaningless things like smoking. For anything of importance, we roll over like little puppies.

Posted by: shingles | April 8, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Wow, such DEEP journalism!
Why is McCain getting a free ride?

Posted by: Mumon | April 8, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Except that I don’t like feeling that I wasn’t being dealt with honestly. And as much as citizens who are suspect of the media might scoff at such a notion, many of us consider ourselves to be your representatives to help make sure our leaders are telling us the truth, and leading the country down a path we as a nation are confident is the right one.
You guys kinda screwed the pooch on that Iraq thingamajiggy though, don’t ya think?……

Posted by: Geoff DeWan | April 8, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

WOW, THIS IS IMPORTANT STUFF! Now maybe you should see if someone lied about something much less consequential- the $3 trillion war of choice, Katrina, budget deficits–you know, the small stuff

Posted by: tom | April 8, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Most non-smokers, even former smokers, view those who smoke today as weak-willed people with little regard for their own bodies. It revels a lot about a man’s character.
Smoking is NOT acceptible in today’s society. Back in the 50′s when over 50% of the population smoked, cigarettes were even advertised as a healthy pick-you-up, but we’ve known how dangerous they really are ever since Obama was a kid. So why did he ever pick up such a depised, self-destructive habit in the first place? And why can’t he kick the habit now? Again, it says a lot about his character.

Posted by: James | May 7, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Obama is a phony, and this is just one more example of it. Typical Democrat running for President, but this time the party is going full throttle pushing the gender card (Clinton) as well as the race card (Obama), with neither having the necessary experience to be commander in chief.
I can’t wait for either of them to win, just for a good 4 years of laughter.

Posted by: rcm | May 19, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

He is not setting the right example to our youth, he has lied about not smoking, he is not trust worthy and he does not deserve the nomination

Posted by: Jon | May 30, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Oh Please, cut the crap about how the Media are Our representatives and it’s your duty to find out the truth to keep our political leaders in check…
did the media disappear from 2002-2005? Did you not exist?
Where were you when our political leaders were lying to us every day and all the media did was Cheer and copy the propaganda straight from the donkey’s mouth.
You failed the American people.
The media didn’t do their job, and frankly, who cares if Obama smoked. Don’t you have anything better to talk about? There is a gruesome war going on in Iraq and Afghanistan and all you can talk about is Obama smoking… the Media is FULL OF IT! you don’t do your job, at all. Besides, you all work for Rupert anyways

Posted by: bob | May 30, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Although I am disappointed to learn that my candidate smokes, this does not change my support. Smoking is a negative for me but I hope that there are venues or lessons that we can offer all smokers. IT took me ten years to quit. I tried being hypnotized, gum, patches, programs, exercise, yoga… Under the kind of pressure Obama is under, I don’t know if now is the time, althoug the example thing… the parent thing… and let him not let down Michelle. Lets get a list of all the public officials who smoke.
Keep on trying to quit! That is all that is important. Lets recognize that smart competent people smoke. This is an addiction folks.

Posted by: kay | May 31, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Wow, you people are really small minded – you can’t trust a person who smokes??!! Do you know that nicotine is more addictive than heroin?? It’s not that easy to “just quit”, and why did he start in the first place?? Maybe you don’t understand the pressures of growing up biracial and the pressure of studying at Harvard Law School. You won’t vote for somebody who smokes – give me a break!! You want a role model for you kids, how about somebody who was president of the law review at Harvard. Ok, Obama is not God, he is not perfect, but he realizes that smoking is not good and he is trying to quit and he is being honest about the relapse. Quitting is not easy, but given all that Obama has overcome in his life, I’m sure he will overcome this too in time. Think about the real issues when you go to vote in November!!

Posted by: jlh | June 24, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

I will not vote for a nicotine addict.

Posted by: Morris B. | July 5, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

I don’t know about you, but it’s a wakeup call when Brangelina gets more news than this election!

Posted by: From Atlanta | July 15, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

The point? Why hide such a small thing? And certainly, why lie about it? Use your brains people. The issue isn’t smoking. Should the highest office in the land go to a man who can’t handle being open and honest about something as simple as his choice to smoke? Ridiculous.

Posted by: bjl | July 17, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Who really cares, people need to be worrying about the real topics at hand: Energy Costs, The Wars in Iraq and Afganistan, Health Care, and the Housing Crunch. Smoking is bad, but it is looked down upon too much in America, after years of ignorance.

Posted by: Patrick | August 27, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

I cannot believe that there are people out there who say they wouldn’t vote for someone because they smoke! If you don’t smoke and don’t want to be around it, fine. But, have you forgotten that America is based on freedom? Just watch out because with an attitude like that, we’ll next be monitoring how many times a week a candidate ate fast food or didn’t exercise. Why don’t we worry about politicians drinking and driving or taking mind altering drugs? The priorities in the U.S. are so screwed up. “Judge not lest you be judged”.

Posted by: Tiny Bubbles | September 7, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

I do not care that he smoke, what I do care about is that he lied about it and that is what Jakes point is. If Obama is going to lie about smoking, about something so petty, then what happens when he lies to the american people about his dealings with much bigger issues??? Why are people so defensive over this guy?? He is NOTHING but another dirty politican!

Posted by: Deborah | October 6, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

MY GOSH!!! All this fuss over a man smoking a damn cigarette? The last time I checked Barack Obama was WELL over the legal age to buy cigarettes and smoke them if he chooses. If he chooses to be a closet smoker that is his right also. It has no bearing on his OBVIOUS qualifications for US President as opposed to that old codger and the soccer mom.

Posted by: Charlie Bradley | October 7, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Well, I’m a smoker and I definitely understand how hard it is to quit! I would even be glad that someone might be in the White House who would understand smokers concerns. Unfortunately, the fact that he hides it, makes it highly unlikely that he would be supportive of smokers concerns and might overreact in the opposite direction to keep hiding it. It also shows a lack of courage. I am constantly being pressured by friends, loved ones, co-workers, and business management to quit, but I successfully resist giving in until I’m ready. The last thing I would do is pretend to quit, but not actually quit and deny it or if not able to, act like I had. It is at best, disingenuous, and at least, cowardly, to do otherwise

Posted by: James Williams | October 7, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

I think if a person smokes it says something about them. And I do not mean something good.
I think it is a weak person who does not have the discipline to quit smoking.
I also am concerned about someone who is going to be in charge of legislating healthcare that does not care enough about their own health to quit smoking.
How much extra will we have to pay for healthcare for people who smoke?

Posted by: David Ruiz | October 10, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

I would rather deal with Clinton’s or Obama’s type of “secret”. Launching missiles to hide getting funky with an intern is bad, true enough. But you can’t possibly say that things were worse before we let that cokehead rule the free world. As for McCain, following in the footsteps of a cokehead is even more insane.

Posted by: Redonk | October 11, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

COME ON FOLKS! Whatever party you choose, you certainly don’t want kids to see a real, current president smoking. What will he say to our kids, “hey, start smoking so we can all quit together”?
Sorry, that is not the kind of “real human” I want as a president. Do we want the BEST person, or just any ole’ guy to run our country? Is anyone of us really searching into the background of this, or any other candidate to see if they can lead anyone, anywhere?
HE SMOKES. That is a basic self-control thing guys…we can’t fund his nicorette patch, or his pack a day either. That is not what they get paid for. If you choose to vote for him, fine, but let’s put a little pressure on him to be a better role model.That should be his real job. He needs to be above what the average joe is, agree?

Posted by: Michele | October 11, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Having not read all of the comments but only about half, someone else may have addressed this. However, it seems to me there are two reasonable explanations of the Obama encounter:
1. He was *around* someone else who was smoking. Maybe he was in a smoky room, or chatting with a friend who was smoking. Rarely, I will go to a smoky bar, and when I come home I have to take a shower because it’s the only way to get the smoky smell off of me.
2. Even if he did lie, it may have been caused by momentary embarrassment at having quit!!! He is *human* after all, and humans tend to be embarrassed at failures, even temporary ones.
And frankly, as long as it is broadly true that he quit smoking, I don’t think it’s anyone’s darned business whether he smoked a cigarette before quitting. Quitting is hard, and the more times you quit the more likely it is that you will stick with it. It’s a personal issue, and not the business of the world whether he had a lone cigarette back in August.

Posted by: phillip | October 14, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

HE needs to try a Crown7-no smell, no second hand smoke, no tar or carcinogens.
Then he will have one less thing to lie about.

Posted by: Ron | October 23, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

I’d rather have him lie about a stupid cigarette (which was legal last time I checked, gross or not) than lie about why he’s bombing and taking over countries that we shouldn’t be in in the first place, big difference people! Wake up and grow up, you neo-con white trash are just using it as an excuse to say you don’t trust him when you’re really all racist pieces of PLOP!

Posted by: Trevor | November 12, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

come on – is this serious journalism? who cares if he had a smoke? Let me tell you what I am concerned with: my 401(k) has lost about 50% of its value, my home has lost 20% of its value, left and right I see people losing their jobs and their homes and somehow, the fact that a man struggled to give up somkeing is news????? WHO CARES???? We have big problems to focus on and to solve…lets not get side tracked please.

Posted by: BADENVER | November 20, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Great persuader or great liar?
Why are you not doing articles on the fact that Obama has stopped talking about taking our troops out of Iraq? Just today the Iraqi Government voted to keep US troops until 2012. Didn’t Obama promise change? Didn’t he tell all you liberals that he would take the troops out day 1???
Change? What does that mean? You all were LIED to. And the liberal media never asked Obama a question!!!!

Posted by: Ames Tiedeman | November 27, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Back off. It’s none of your business. Just because he is in public office does not mean he has to answer every question he gets asked. Whether he smokes, whether he drinks coffee or tea, whether he wears socks when making love – it’s none of our business. Your question, and in fact, the way you probed for the answer, makes you appear to be quite the pathetic jackass. Find something important to occupy your time.

Posted by: nkw | December 7, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Come on, who cares if he smokes. It is no one’s business and it is his right. It is not illegal. There are more important issues to worry about. Smoke away!

Posted by: Kate | January 31, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am

i can not belive i voted for somebody that is not drug-free i still love u obama

Posted by: jordyn | February 4, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Hey seems like a lot of the comments sumed up what I wanted to say about the President and his smoking (even though I didn’t read all of them)He have more issues to worry about than smoking’ he’s human give the man a break. It’s a stress relief even though I pefer the Almighty for mines. But we live and learn.Let’s just focus on the more important things like the “Economy”. ok. Can we just all get along?

Posted by: GBfrom NC | February 5, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am

obama shouldnt smke come on cause ummm its bad for his health amd he has to do alot of work so and he has kids and thats not gud cause it can effect them to

Posted by: jerrika | March 30, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

ITs all about the lie.

Posted by: Mike | August 6, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

If ever there was a time to have a cig it would be in the run up to becoming the president lol. I am not surprised he fell off the wagon several times!

Posted by: grinders | October 3, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I too heard that Obama is smoking. But he’s trying to ban e cigarette.

Posted by: E Cigarette | December 4, 2010, 3:34 am 3:34 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.