Apr 28, 2008 4:25pm

Obama Says McCain Has “Gall” for Criticisms over Gas Tax Holiday

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller Reports: Sen. Barack Obama responded to Sen. John McCain’s charge that he is "out of touch" and "insensitive" on issues of the economy.

McCain’s criticism came yesterday in Florida, when McCain said of Obama’s lack of support for the gas tax holiday, "Obviously Senator Obama does not understand that this would be a nice thing for Americans."

Obama returned the criticisms at a town hall today in Wilmington, North Carolina, saying that McCain’s support of the gas tax holiday is not a proper fix for the problem of energy crisis, nor will it help people in the short term.

Watch the VIDEO HERE.

Obama said the savings would only amount to $25 or $30 dollars, "or half a tank of gas," and that McCain’s plan and criticism are misplaced.

"He had the gall yesterday to tell me that obviously, because I didn’t agree with his plan, I must not be sympathetic to poor people. That’s what he said," Obama exclaimed, and then turned the table back at McCain, "This is at the same time that he is proposing hundreds of billion of dollars of more tax breaks for corporate interests to the wealthiest Americans, and he doesn’t explain how it is that we’re going to pay highway trust fund."

Obama said McCain’s solution amounts to a quick fix where a politician can claim they are helping, but is really just pretending to do something about the problem.

"That’s typical of how Washington works. There’s a problem: everybody’s upset about gas prices. Let’s find some short term, quick fix. That we can say we did something, even though we’re not really doing anything. Because if you actually took away the gas tax, what are the oil companies going to do? They’re gonna raise your gas by 5 cents. You’ll never see the savings. And then we pretend to do something."

Senator McCain’s spokesman, Tucker Bounds, responded to Obama’s argument saying, "It’s clear Barack Obama’s not strong enough to provide immediate relief at the pump, and it shows he doesn’t understand our economy or have the ability to deliver for hardworking Americans. Senator Obama’s arguments against John McCain’s gas tax holiday are complete fiction, and the reality is that he used to support a gas tax holiday before he was running for President."

Senator Obama while in the Illinois State Senate in 2002, voted to suspend the 5% state sales tax on gasoline.

At a later town hall in Wilson, North Carolina, Obama for the first time, tied his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, to McCain on the gas tax holiday.

"John and recently Hillary Clinton they both I think are saying the same thing," Obama said explaining the gas tax holiday he called a "gimmick: which the other two candidates support.

Obama then questioned what Senator McCain has done with his time in the Senate to solve the gas crisis in the long term, "Where’s John McCain’s been for the last 25 years? What has he been doing to promote clean energy and to increase fuel efficiently standards?"

ABC’s Bret Hovell contributed to this report.

User Comments

Obama is dead wrong!
The gas tax holiday is not meant as a
quick fix or a fix of any kind!
It is meant to provide some temporary
relief to American taxpayers!
What’s wrong with that?

Posted by: reaganfan | April 28, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Reaganfan, what is wrong is that Mccain at one time did not support the Bush tax cuts and now supports it to get votes. Mccain did not support big government and populist agenda and now he does. Where does McCain stand.

Posted by: james | April 28, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

the McCain/Clinton plan is awful. It won’t make any significant difference as Oil companies will raise prices to cover the new tax Clinton proposes. If you want to lower gas, lower the demand. Invest $10 billion in manufacturing 3 million cars that don’t run on gas. 3 million fewer customers will have more of an effect. Sell half the national reserve to the oil companies, use the money to manufacture another 50 million cars and then replace that oil at half the cost.

Posted by: Louis | April 28, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Speaking of “gall”, I would just turn this around and ask obama” “didn’t your esteemed wright have the gall to come out this afternoon and say he is being “crucified” by his statements? Where does wright get the “gall” to say he is being crucified? Wright and obama really do think they are part of a deity don’t they? I cannot believe the GALL of obama or wright. These two very ugly spirited people have pushed the Civil Rights movement back 50 years and I know they just love it. What kind of people have we been turning out that have the “gall” to want to destroy America. The gall-less like obama and wright?

Posted by: Lou | April 28, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Yes, it would be nice to hear about the issues. The mud slinging gets us nowhere and what we really need to know is WHAT will each person do. How will each candidate fix a problem? All this mud just muddies (pardon the pun) up the water and keeps us off track from finding some real solutions. At least Obama has some solution ideas, some of which may work, others won’t. But in the end, we will never really know if these ideas will work until the election is over and the individual in office. What they promise now and what they really can do are two very different things.

Posted by: Gayle | April 28, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I don’t need immediate relief at the pump, I need long term solutions that will kick-in within four years. McCain has nothing on this issue. I think he believes trees cause global warming or that to save the ice caps we need to attack the penguins.

Posted by: Johnny Boy | April 28, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Horget a gas tax holiday…that is stupid…so we sace 50$ once and then the oil and gas companies slowly raise it back to the same height and say it is from pressure from the middle east and that their refinieries shortage is hurting the American people
all the while these companies are making huge income….getting bigger and bigger.
This is like giving the money to the oil companies by saying here is the gas relief…and within days they will raise the costs…and the tax (that helps America pay her bills…you know the ones we owe to China for this great war McCain wants to keep up)…
that tax will never be able to be reinstated…because it will be too big of a jump.
This is dumb on McCain’s part…he said he wasn’t an economist and now we see that he isn’t.

Posted by: dl | April 28, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Senator McCain’s “gas tax holiday” would take place during the summer driving season, when demand for gas will already be high.
He wants to encourage people to burn even *more* gasoline?
Also, when the “tax holiday” is over, will that constitute a tax increase? :-)

Posted by: MothyJohn | April 28, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

The gas tax holiday is one of the more inane ideas to be proposed yet.
Suspending the federal 18.4-cent-per-gallon tax would save the average motorist about $28. But the plan would cost the government $9 billion in lost highway funds and put at risk an estimated 300,000 jobs tied to the funding, according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
This at a time when the Highway Trust Fund, which bankrolls local and state road and bridge projects, is already facing a $3.4 billion deficit.
A McCain said he would borrow from the general fund to make up the shortfall, but doing that would just add to the federal deficit.

Posted by: Deward Bowles | April 28, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

A
Gas tax holiday is not going to releive the pain at the pump when the costs keep rising…5 cents isn’t going to matter.
The prices are going to continue to rise…
and his logic isn’t child’s logic…in fact when I read yuor comment I thought you were calling McCain’s gas tax holiday Child logic. Because that is what it is.

Posted by: dl | April 28, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

sorry meant to say percent

Posted by: dl | April 28, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Obama is absolutely right abut the gas tax – if we have a tax holiday, people will never see a cent out of it because McCain’s friends in the oil industry will just raise prices to make up the difference and increase their own profits.
The truth about rising gas prices is that they aren’t actually being caused by supply/demand issues, but by the tanking value of the dollar. We should still be pushing fuel efficiency and alternative energy sources as a means of achieving energy independence and helping the environment, but if we really want to get the price of gas down, we’re going to have to address the weak dollar.

Posted by: Big Tex | April 28, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Obama has a plan, to invest billions in developing alternative energy sources, a byproduct of this being a lower demand for oil. Investing in alternative energy is the only thing that will work in the meantime. Obama’s also 100% right, as soon as the gas tax is suspended prices will go up voided any real savings. McCain and Clinton are all politics. Obama’s the only one with real, lasting ideas.

Posted by: Topher | April 28, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

A,
Go to Obama’s website and read his energy policy. How can you say he doesn’t have one. By the way, a gas tax holiday is not an energy policy. What programs will they stop funding because they don’t have a gas tax to pay for them?

Posted by: Topher | April 28, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

To save money on gas, people could also:
- take public transit (much cheaper)
- replace the big SUV for a smaller fuel efficient car
- limit the use of car to what’s absolutely necessary
Europeans have understood one thing long time ago that, apparently, is too difficult for American people. By raising tax on oil, they force people to reduce their fuel consumption, allowing these countries to be less dependant on Saudi Arabia and Venezuela, obliging local car manufacturers to produce better cars and thus be more competitive, having more money to invest in education, health care, green technologies and else (= money stays in the country), and protect the environment at the same time.
Is it too difficult to understand ??? What benefits will the short term tax break have for the country in the long term ? (answer: nothing, it’s just a waste of money)

Posted by: A+ | April 28, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Without the gas tax they’d probably cut funding for education programs again so people are just smart enough to go along with what politicians tell them but not quite smart enough to question their leaders.

Posted by: Topher | April 28, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

This temporary gas tax idea is a joke , so we get a five cents off a gallon or what ever , meanwhile the oil companies and market weekly keep driving up gas prices to four bucks and well over . It’s a pull the wool over your eyes BS plan is what it is and of course MCcain and Clinton support it knowing so many will think they are actually getting relief and that somethiung serious is being done about gas prices . Obama calls it like it is , a joke .That’s the difference between Obama and Clinton , Clinton lies and deceieves and plays games , anything for political gain . Obama is and will be straight up with the American people .

Posted by: Ray | April 28, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

The gas tax holiday has never passed Congress. It’s never passed specifically because the federal highway program would lose the funding that the gas tax creates.
Obama’s solution is to leave the gas tax alone, since it will provide maybe a half-tank’s savings over the summer, and focus on alternative energies and other long-term fixes. This makes more sense than either Clinton’s or McCain’s proposals. A temporary “holiday” won’t work, especially when prices are rising by a penny a day. By the time Memorial Day rolls around, we’ll probably be over $4/gallon. Honestly, the $0.18 doesn’t make much difference at that point – except to endanger hundreds of thousands of jobs.
Clinton’s plan is proposed to be financed by a temporary windfall profits tax (which I don’t think will ever pass; I can just see the oil lobbyists locking up votes to defeat that now). McCain’s plan isn’t financed at all (unless Cindy’s chipping in), which seems to fly in the face of typical conservative fiscal policy.

Posted by: BMR, Pittsburgh PA | April 28, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Obama is his own worst enemy. He voted for the Cheney Energy Bill. His “typical white people” “lunch pail workers”, bitter, total disregard of his mother and grandparents, aloofness, whining and short temper are just some of his problems. When your minister of 20 years starts dissing you there is a BIGGER problem we don’t know about. Wright and Obama’s other ‘patrons’ are tightening the choke collar on him trying to keep him inline. Wright has an ego as big as all outdoors, but his presence now is motivated by “the old I made you, I can break you” syndrome at work in all its glory. Obama is bought and paid for.

Posted by: Linda | April 28, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

The Gas Tax Holiday is a total joke. The gas tax is only 18 cents a gallon. Imposing the gas tax holiday would drop the price to a SUPER!!! affordable $3.57 a gallon from its current price of $3.75 a gallon in Seattle. Yeah, that will really help.

Posted by: Topher | April 28, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

McCain’s philosophy for this election; promise, borrow and spend. If anyone ask any questions, lie till there is no tomorrow.

Posted by: Shawn | April 28, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

A,
It’s very clear you did not read Obama’s energy policy and are only spewing rhetoric. Just words, no substance. Obama proposes increasing fuel vehicle efficiency, utilizing E85 Ethanol blended fuel and $150 billion over 10 years to develop alternative and renewable energy among other ideas. What does McCain offer?

Posted by: Topher | April 28, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Triple the gas tax and invest the proceeds in alternative energy. Oil won’t last forever, so keeping it cheap ain’t doing anybody any favors. It is more of the same shortsighted spend your children’s oil cause you’ve already spent their money with record deficits.

Posted by: David Morgan | April 28, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

You, I am a Republican ready to voter for John Mccain, But, I dont think he knows what he is talking about, and when he tries to come up with remedies, they are so OLD SCHOOL. I am going to vote for Obama with all his baggage. Better than these two OLD WASHINGTON players, Hillary and John, who don’t want to change anything, and will give you what you want to hear. The American People both Dems and Repubs are smarter than that.

Posted by: latinovoter1 | April 28, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I can understand this suggestion from McCain. He admits that he does not understand economics. But coming from Clinton, this is political pandering, pure and simple. You cannot repeal the laws of supply and demand any more than you can repeal the laws of physics. In the absence of an unlikely boost in supply, the only solution is to decrease demand, and there is no “quick fix” for that. It would be more productive to increase gas taxes, take our medicine once and for all, and find some rational use for the increased revenue. At least that way the inevitable increases in gas prices would result in money staying in the US rather than going to foreign oil producers.

Posted by: Beezer | April 28, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Funny how Obama likes to use words like “GALL” and “AUDACITY”.

Posted by: Justice | April 28, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Lower the Gas tax and the oil companies will find away to raise the price. So in the end we pay the same anyway until the tax relief expires. Then what? It is still a windfall for the oil companies.

Posted by: Thinking | April 28, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

YOU GUYS ARE MISSING THE POINT, AND THE LAST LINE OF THE ARTICLE. OBAMA IS CRITICIZING MCCAIN ON HIS BID TO SUSPEND THE GAS TAX, BUT OBAMA HIMSELF VOTED TO SUSPEND THE GAS TAX IN THE ILLINOIS SENATE. JUST ANOTHER CASE OF OBAMA FLIP-FLOPPING, THEN LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. SAD THING IS, HIS FOLLOWERS WILL BELIEVE ANYTHING THIS DANGEROUS LIAR SAYS.

Posted by: doublestandard | April 28, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

If tax is halted then what happens to the workers that would normally be fixing roadways? Summer with the dry weather is the best and safest time for roadworkers to work and the roads I travel sure could use the help and we do not need any jobs lost because of shortsided views.
Also what happens to all the funds that the government has already commited to pay for projects that are already in the works? Are they halted too or will we face larger taxes come fall?

Posted by: Daly | April 28, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Doublestandard, Perhaps he’s not endorsiing the gas tax holidy because he’s learned from the experience. I lived in Illinois during that period and I can tell you, it didn’t make a darn difference at the pump. Prices kept going up.

Posted by: Kerry | April 28, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

“That’s typical of how Washington works. There’s a problem: everybody’s upset about gas prices. Let’s find some short term, quick fix. That we can say we did something, even though we’re not really doing anything. Because if you actually took away the gas tax, what are the oil companies going to do? They’re gonna raise your gas by 5 cents. You’ll never see the savings. And then we pretend to do something.”
AWESOME! I love this argument – embodies what makes Obama different from McCain and how McClinton or McBush the same old dirty politics

Posted by: xyz | April 28, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Dumb idea, unfortunately, unless you also imposed price controls. The oil companies would very quickly increase the pump prices to eat up the reduction in price.

Posted by: nazcalito | April 28, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Dumb idea, unfortunately, unless you also imposed price controls. The oil companies would very quickly increase the pump prices to eat up the reduction in price.

Posted by: nazcalito | April 28, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Let’s think about the math for a second. My gas tank is 14 gallons. I only have to fill up once a month or so, but my wife fills up twice a week so I’ll use her as a more typical example. A reduction in price of ~18.4 cents results in $2.576 savings per tank of gas, so just over $5 per week. There are roughly 4 weeks in a month and 5 months in the proposed “holiday”, so let’s go with 21 weeks for good measure. This means an average American who fills up twice a week will save a little over a hundred dollars over five months. Wow, what a savings, people. That’s a whole DVD a month!!! (Yes, I know, some people fill up more than that, but some people fill up less than that, so an average is probably pretty close.)
By contrast, there are what, 300 million Americans, and last I saw ~57% of Americans drive. So 171 million drivers at $100 means the transportation department will lose roughly $17 BILLION in revenue that could be used to help support our automotive infrastructure (bridges, anyone?). Seems to me Obama’s got the math right on this one, and may even be using more conservative calculations than I am.

Posted by: Bronxx | April 28, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Yeah McCain that temporary 18 cent reduction will make all the difference to me, NOT. Last time I filled up gas cost $4.09, that’s a good buck more than it shou;ld. Not a friggin 18 cents.

Posted by: JR | April 28, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

McCain has flip flopped so many times about so many issues that he has to have assistants to keep him straight and they are not doing a very good job of it. McCain has sold his soul to the right wing neocons to get their support but it has made him into Bush II. It is revolting to think of any of Bush’s policies benefiting only the rich being continued. Our country has been drained of finances by the Iraq war and major mismanagement of the Bush administration. Bush and his cronies have war profiteered the U.S for every dime they could get. The next administration will have to be a miracle worker to undo the damage Bush and Cheney have brought about.

Posted by: Vicki | April 28, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

These are nothing more than short term reductions for political purposes, onbc all this is over it is back to the same old, same old. I find hard to believe that people realy buy into this.
Tax cuts and universal healthcare, sounds like tax cuts and war. These things shouldn’t happen at the sametime.
We are very rapidly becoming a third world country. Unless America wakes up and begin to understand that we have to pay for the things we want, we will go further in debt weaking the dollar, well you know the rest.
Focus folks

Posted by: Thinking | April 28, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

whats 18 cents ,,,when there going to raise the gas price a dollor or more anyway…we need good roads..
obama is right,,,build more cars that take less gas,,,,,andy

Posted by: andy radermacher | April 28, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

whats 18 cents ,,,when there going to raise the gas price a dollor or more anyway…we need good roads..
obama is right,,,build more cars that take less gas,,,,,andy

Posted by: andy radermacher | April 28, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

People will fuel across the street at another business even if gas is only 1 cent cheaper. Obama says that the tax holiday wouldn’t help much so let’s not do it at all. I think if McCain is a REPUB and Clinton is a DEM and they BOTH have bipartisian agreement, that is a worthwhile cause to help fuel prices EVEN if it doesn’t seem like much to Obama. Washington hasn’t really HAD to worry about fuel the last 25 years. USA hasn’t had a problem since the fuel crisis of the 70s. Ethanol is NOT the plan it’s cracked up to be and getting a car designed that carries more than 2 people with 40 or 50 mpg is a challenge!

Posted by: Darla | April 29, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Those who critize the McCain/Clinton gas-tax holiday and claim Obama has a better plan forget something. It is a TEMPORARY RELIEF plan-hence the HOLIDAY part. All of the candidates have long term ‘solutions’. Don’t forget that Obama receives plenty of oil money from petroleum industry just like many of his fellow politicians. Notice all the calls to eliminate subsidies to the oil companies from congress have pretty much fallen on deaf ears, wonder why? To call and critisize the the gas-tax holiday as an energy policy is just
pure Obama Propaganda from another hypocritical oil-enriched politician.

Posted by: Doug | April 29, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

The Saudis know they have about two years left on their monopoly of crude oil – they are milking it for all they can.
Meanwhile, we are so concerned for the caribou we can’t tap into tremendous resources that would free us, or at least loosen the Gulf’s grip on our economy.
The problem with any plan the candidates have thrown out there is that they all depend on the GOVERNMENT. The Governemtn doesn’t create anything except beauracracies. Free market solutions are out there – but most Americans seem to think that mommy dearest in Washington should do all the heavy lifting.
That ain’t how this country was founded; and the more we depend on the government to get us out of messes, the deeper the mess becomes.
Stop expecting the government to make your life better. That was never what it was supposed to do.

Posted by: theBitterTruth | April 29, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Obama’s remark that the “gas tax holiday” only amounts to the cost of a tank of gas – a tank of gas gets me to work every week, so I can earn $$$ to put back into the economy – oh and feed my family. If Obama doesn’t think $25 means anything to most folks, then he’s way off in another world – maybe he is too “elitist” for the “common folk”.

Posted by: Krisp | April 29, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Reganfan said:”As well as the Bush tax cuts worked(at least until this year) they would have been more beneficial if spending cuts had also been made!”
Really, how did you benefit from the Bush tax cuts??? Unless you’re in the top 1% of income earners you didn’t benefit much.. But hey it sounds great… Say it with me tax cuts….

Posted by: Will | April 29, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

ReganFan:
McCain was opposed to the tax cuts because we were at war, he said our country has never cut taxes while we were at war and it made him sick…. Well we’re still at war and he’s pushing tax cuts… Flip Flopper… We’ll be seeing lot more of his flip flops when Hillary graciously bows out… And the Dems and the American public can focused on the double talking McCain…

Posted by: Will | April 29, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Krisp, that $20 you save at the pump, you will have to pay with interest through other taxes. It’s like putting it on a credit card and saying you saved money. No you didn’t. You are just paying for it differently. The only way to actually lower the cost of gas is through:
increased supply (more drilling in Alaska/North Dakota)
decreased demand (conservation, fuel efficiency and alternative fuels).

Posted by: X marks the spot | April 29, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

This gas tax thing won’t help?!?! Speak for yourself. I’m just $25-$50 away from being totally out of debt. Not including the price of everything else spiraling out of control, the dollar worth nothing, and interest rates making saving not an option, this $25-$50 will get me that much closer to living the American Dream. Thank God for John McCain!!

Posted by: greg | April 29, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Why on earth are politicians considering LOWERING the price of gas? Yeah it’s hurting at the pump, but the way to ease that is to lower demand, not increase it by lowering the price. Obama has his head on straight and is not afraid to speak the truth regardless of whether people like it or not. I just hope his blunt style doesn’t get him in too much trouble.

Posted by: Kevin | April 29, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

For the sake of North America, Obama MUST become the next President of the United States. If either Hillary Clinton (and her gang) or John McCain (and his cronies) becomes the next President of The USA, the American people will suffer the consequences, and it won’t be pretty.
The World’s money supply – that fuels America – will be increasingly difficult to obtain. The World’s moneylenders just got “suckered” by the Americans and many of them took a heavy loss. They don’t want to be” suckered again!” They want to see change!
Unfortunate, but true, for Clinton and McCain, the World’s moneylenders see them as Status Quo, and more of the same. The biggest threat to the average American’s wellbeing is not a terrorist threat from abroad, but rather… (We interrupt this message to join Senator Obama during a speech in progress in Raleigh, North Carolina)
“The most serious threat to the wellbeing of most Americans is not a physical threat from abroad, but rather a financial threat from within its own borders. We must always stand on guard for America, we must never fail Her, but it is tantamount that we get our financial house in order, and we must do it now! We cannot wait another four years; we cannot stand by idly and watch our economy flounder like a fish out of water.
“I am not a miracle man, I cannot feed a multitude of people with two pieces of fish and a few loafs of bread. Nobody on earth can. It takes a lot of hard work to feed a multitude of people. And it takes a lot of hard work to support those people after they are fed.
“All that we ask for, here in America, is for the opportunity to support our own people. To build roads, and churches, and schools for them. To provide them with essential services, productive activities, medicines and loving care. We will provide doctors and nurses, bricklayers and electricians, miners and machine operators. We will provide lifeguards and inspectors, technicians, musicians, inventors and entrepreneurs. We will not rest until ALL Americans are productive or gainfully employed and we will reward them for their effort. With the aid of science, and a compassion for our fellow man, America will feed the world, generate new sources of pure power, rebuild a nation, and put our people to work.
“We have it all right here in America. We have talented people from all walks of life, gorgeous mountains, sweeping plains and vast forests. Within ten years, we shall not be dependent upon a single drop of imported oil, with the exception of oil that we purchase and import from Canada and Mexico, and some of our other trusted friends. Canada has more oil than Saudi Arabia and Mexico plans to deliver for the next twenty years. We shall offer them a fair price for their oil, we don’t steal from our friends. And in return we will offer them our products, at our very best price, and we will offer them more. We will offer to share our domestic markets with them on a cordial basis. The United States is the backbone of North America and North America is the most prosperous of all the continents. We expect to have good relationships with our friends in Europe, The Middle East, Asia, Africa, South America and Australia, but the Canadians and the Mexicans will always be our closest friends.
“We expect to provide meaningful and rewarding employment for all Americans that are able and choose to work. We expect to provide support for our artists and care for our elderly people. We expect to share the wealth generated in the United States of America amongst the people of America in an amicable way. There is something fundamentally wrong when some employees of Corporate America receive hundreds of millions of dollars annually, while other employees work for the minimum wage. The gap is far too wide and it is getting wider every day. There is something fundamentally wrong when employees work their entire adulthood only to discover that their hard-earned pension has vanished, gone up in smoke on Wall Street. There is something fundamentally wrong with some of our laws and regulations that would allow such a thing to happen. There is something fundamentally wrong with Corporate America when it disavows its obligations to the citizens that it serves. There is something fundamentally wrong, and its time for a fundamental change. We must change our way of thinking, and we must change our way of doing business if we are to prosper and….”
We interrupt this speech to bring you this special message: An asteroid, the size of Guam has been detected and it is heading in our general direction. NASA informs us that a collision with our planet is unavoidable and at its current speed impact will take place on or about November 30 of this year. We are sorry for this interruption. Now back to Senator Obama, and the closing moments of his speech.
Tommy D______
Professor of Smozology

Posted by: Tommy D_____ | April 29, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

“GALL”.. well thats fightin words, Barack…what a whimp!

Posted by: DaneNM | April 30, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Elitist? Out of touch?Flip-flop on previous position on gas tax holiday? Experience teaches you a lot of things. If you voted to try it in your state, you SHOULD know that it is not the thing to try at the national level. CORRECT decision, Senator Obama.
Giving people a $25 or $50 break now that will cost them MORE in the very near future is not expected of a leader. Of the 3 senators making proposals, Obama is the only one who seems to care enough about the people and their long-term needs,to make the RIGHT change in his position on the subject. You have a pandering senator and an “I don’t know much about economics” senator. Looks like we are going to need someone who has that kind of experience and the wisdom and the audacity to say it is not the best decision for the people who need a REAL break.
BTW. gall and audacity are great words in this election cycle. And “weak” and “whip” do NOT apply to Senator Obama. Not by a long shot.

Posted by: Alethea | April 30, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

oops, “whimp” does NOT apply to Senator Obama.

Posted by: Alethea | April 30, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.