Apr 2, 2008 10:36am

Obama to Unions: I’m Ready To Play Offense

ABC News’ David Wright, Sunlen Miller and Alyssa Litoff Report: Speaking before the AFL-CIO Constitution Convention in Philadelphia, Sen. Barack Obama continued the Rocky analogies of Sen. Hillary Clinton yesterday – and said it is he that is the true underdog in Pennsylvania.

"I know there’s been some talk about Rocky Balboa over the last couple of days," Obama said, "Last time I checked, I was the underdog in this state."

Obama said he liked the Rocky story but, "we got to remember that ‘Rocky’ was a movie and so is the idea that somebody can fight for working people and at the same time embrace the broken system in Washington, where corporate lobbyists use their clout to shape laws, to their likening?"

It was one of several obvious slams at his Democratic opponent within his speech without mentioning her by name once.

The Senator from Illinois also made a brief comment at the top about bowling, not in direct response to Clinton’s bowl-off challenge made yesterday in jest, but was indicative of his feelings on the invitation.

"My poll numbers dropped a little bit after bowling, which is why I’m going to tear out the bowling alley in the White House, we’re putting up a basketball court," Obama joked but then added of the bowling alley, "maybe I should leave it in there to get some practice."

Within his remarks to the labor unions, Obama continued on to talk about policy with a sport-like analogy: being on the offense.

"I said it before and I will say it again. I’m tried of playing defense, and I know the AFL-CIO is tired of playing defense. We’re ready to play some offense. We’re ready to play some offense for a decent wage. We’re ready to play offense for retirement security. We’re ready to play offense for universal health care," he said in a cadence that came up throughout his speech.

Obama told the union members that he is one of them as someone who knows how hard it can be to take care of your family. 

"Imagine a president whose life’s story is like so many of your own, who knows what it’s like to go to college on student loans or see his mother sick and worry that maybe she can’t pay the medical bills," he said, referencing his mother who died of cancer.

"We’re ready to play offense for organized labor," Obama shouted, "It’s time we had a president who didn’t choke saying the word ‘union’.

"It’s time we have a Democratic nominee who doesn’t just talk about unions during the primary," he concluded, in another obvious stab at Clinton who spoke before the AFL-CIO just one day before.

User Comments

This is a double game that the HRC has going on now.
Hillary can’t win honestly due to the MATH. Everybody knows this. But if she admits it in public the donor base will go elsewhere. Cash dries up. SupaDelegates will go over to O.
So she has to at least pretend the can win the nomination legitimately.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 2, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

I’ll bet Obama is watching it, he needs some new ideas to copy.

Posted by: Jacko | April 2, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

“Imagine a president whose life’s story is like so many of your own, who knows what it’s like to go to college on student loans or see his mother sick and worry that maybe she can’t pay the medical bills,”
That IS a life like my own. Now am I qualified to the be the president and commander and chief?
I don’t think so.
Specifics, Obama. Just how will you improve the positions of the unions? Will you change the laws regarding at-will rights to work to stop the bleeding of computer science jobs overseas? Will you support unionization of the software industry?
Or is this speech only for blue collar workers? I’ve been both. So fine, what will you do about the rising cost of fuel for the nation’s truckers?
As Vice President, you would preside over the Senate and that means you would have the power to get some real legislation passed.
Specifics, Obama. I don’t give a flying frik that you play a good game of hoops or that you embarassed yourself because a bowling ball can’t be dribbled.

Posted by: len | April 2, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

len, Obama has a magic wand! And lots of pretty speeches! That’s all he needs.

Posted by: Jo | April 2, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Obama told the union members that he is one of them just like he told a group of Irish people on St. Patrick’s Day, that he is Irish, and he keeps pushing his mother was white, his father was black, or when he was in Hawaii, he spoke of them as brothers and on and on. He is everyone’s candidate and the last time this was tried was Hitler who told all of the MANY enthusiastic followers that he was just one of them too. How quickly we forget. His church ties and their philosophy that has enthralled him for some 20 years to make the black race superior by destroying the white race is a pretty similar analogy too.

Posted by: Anne | April 2, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I don’t think the media would characterize him as the “Underdog” but voters know he’s not the “Front Runner” either. If he was the front runner, he wouldn’t be making the gratuiitous attacks that his campaign is making against Clinton daily.
Remember the italian saying “Fish rot from the head.”

Posted by: s. valenti | April 2, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Tell me what part of the Obama life story (the one that he’s willing to share that is) that resonates with working class people in Pennsylvania or elsewhere. The part that has maintained a 20 year relationship with an anti-american, racist minister? The part that has his wife only recently proud to be an american – and only when her inexperienced, untested husband is on the national stage? The part that is willing to destroy the Democratic Party with the complicity of the far left wing of the DNC? Tell me, Mr. Obama,which of your many faces would the public see if – God forbid – you won the election?

Posted by: s. valenti | April 2, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

If Senator Clinton and her gang of highly-paid political goons continue to bash Senator Obama, her polls numbers will continue to drop and she does not have a chance of getting the nomination with this style of ‘same-old,same-old politics’. The public has had enough of ‘Clinton politics’ of negative campaigning. She may win PA., but she will never get the nomination. The public is on to her ‘win at any cost’ game and fed up with this style . Sen. Obama will be a refreshing change for DC, the White House, and our country.

Posted by: Derek | April 2, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Hilly is fighting for her life….She is for herself and her self only If you think for one minute she gives a hoot for the middle class and poor people you are sadly mistakened…She will do and say ANYTHING to get in the White House.So if you are nuts enough to vote for her go for it.Later in her term I will be the one saying I told you so……Then it is to late…..

Posted by: h | April 2, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

I don’t think Obama will be traveling with one of his earlier surrogates, Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachusetts. He’s going down the tubes fast. Even the Boston Globe, so in the tank for Obama and Patrick until recently have lost patience with the guy who promised “hope”, “change” and “Yes, we can. WELL, NO HE CAN’T!
Read the coverage in the Boston Globe and comments on the blog: Blue Mass Group.

Posted by: s. valenti | April 2, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

TCG,
The only people that know Hillary can’t win are you and Obama, you guys are way smarter than us working class Democrats who haven’t figured that out yet, so we keep voting for her. Otherwise, why hasn’t Obama been able to close the deal? Check out Michael Barone’s projections, which are just basic projections, which shows Hillary prevails in the popular vote nationally by the end game. (That’s without Michigan and Florida). There will be plenty of spin basis to get the supers moved in her corner. I can see the county level maps coming out now showing gray territory for Obama and blue territory for Clinton, showing that she took 90 per cent of the county geography. We shall see, we shall see.
As a well-committed rabbit, you have plenty of time to take a nap between now and August. Don’t worry about Hillary, nothing to worry about. Feel free to take that nap.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 2, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Hillary is campaigning on the fact that she is campaigning. Vote for Hillary because she is still campaigning. Vote for Hillary because Richardson failed to indorse her, Vote for Hillary because other Democrates are telling her to give it up. Vote for Hillary because she is loosing. Vote for Hillary because her campaign is broke.
Vote for Hillary because she doesn’t like Obama. Voyte for Hillary cuz if you don’t she is going to vote for McCain.

Posted by: Thinking | April 2, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Barack has started out as the under dog .. But his message will carry through til april 22 .

Posted by: Lauren | April 2, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Thinking (well obviously not),
Try this:
Vote for Hillary because she is the ONLY candidate to stand up for all voters.
===============================
Obama got $250,000
Rezko gets jail
================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 2, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Obama always speaks in the name of every American by using the word we. He doesn’t say I CAN but WE CAN. That is one of the most amazing thing I like about him. Whereas Hillary says I CAN.

Posted by: I.A.T Smith | April 2, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

When ever the numbers change Hillary
throws in the Kitchen sink.
so all duck and run for cover to our awaiting cars.
Hillary Pay all those companies you owe money to. They need to pay their mortgages . They don’t want to lose their homes and just be another statistic.
vote for Obama

Posted by: Lauren | April 2, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

The real Obama DID stand up when in ’95 he helped organize the Million Man March with his best pal Louis Farrakhan.
America says No Thanks!

Posted by: Jo | April 2, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Barack when your in the white house keep practicing your bowling you might get better.
Plus I think your girls will enjoy it .

Posted by: Lauren | April 2, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Did he mean corporate lobbyists as in the NUCLEAR/ENERGY areas? He has a telling record on that. Look it up! Did he mean UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE as in his plan that does not cover everyone? Look at how the experts compared his plan with Hillary’s plan and John Edwards’ plan. Does he mean that only he had to obtain student loans? He tries to scoot Hillary out of the way on the issues, and he just can’t do it. She is the one who has fought for workers’ rights and labor laws, childcare, education, and healthcare for families. He is a spinner with rhetorical generalities. Look at their records and compare them. Hillary wins, hands down.

Posted by: georgia | April 2, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

IAT Smith,
So you think Obama is including you and me when he says “We”.
I don’t think so. I think he means, he, Wright, Farrakhan, and all their cronies.
Also, the guy has received the most money from big oil. Do you think those guys are really interested in alternative energy, when their profits are at an all-time high and growing? Think again.
========================================
Obama got $250,000!
Rezko gets jail!
Obama doesn’t stand up for ALL voters!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 2, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

The Washington Post Fact Checker section catches Obama in another example of him embellishing his and his family’s history:
Addressing civil rights activists in Selma, Ala., a year ago, Sen. Barack Obama traced his “very existence” to the generosity of the Kennedy family, which he said paid for his Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and thus meet his Kansan mother.
The Camelot connection has become part of the mythology surrounding Obama’s bid for the Democratic presidential nomination. After Caroline Kennedy endorsed his candidacy in January, Newsweek commentator Jonathan Alter reported that she had been struck by the extraordinary way in which “history replays itself” and by how “two generations of two families — separated by distance, culture and wealth — can intersect in strange and wonderful ways.”
It is a touching story — but the key details are either untrue or grossly oversimplified.
Contrary to Obama’s claims in speeches in January at American University and in Selma last year, the Kennedy family did not provide the funding for a September 1959 airlift of 81 Kenyan students to the United States that included Obama’s father. According to historical records and interviews with participants, the Kennedys were first approached for support for the program nearly a year later, in July 1960. The family responded with a $100,000 donation, most of which went to pay for a second airlift in September 1960.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton acknowledged yesterday that the senator from Illinois had erred in crediting the Kennedy family with a role in his father’s arrival in the United States. He said the Kennedy involvement in the Kenya student program apparently “started 48 years ago, not 49 years ago as Obama has mistakenly suggested in the past.”

Posted by: ch | April 2, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Probably Jo and he will need a magic wand because he has no history of uniting by dint of honest work.
Gartner Research once used a measurement called the ‘magic quadrant’ as a means of rating a vendor in the market. The technique was passed along to companies and government institutions as a means to rate RFP (Request for Proposals) submissions. The MQ plots the intersection point of two values; on the X axis “Completeness of Vision” and on the Y “Ability to Execute”.
Obama would fail this. Why?
1. The vision is fuzzy. It is full of platitudes but no solid goals or directions.
2. His ability to execute is highly doubtful. He is as Karl Rove described him: detached, aloof and condescending. We saw this clearly in the debates when he put his hand on Edwards to console him as the ‘lone white guy’. He is divisive. In his insignificant time in the Senate, he has failed to actually unite or pass much legislation. Instead of doing the job he was hired to do, he began his run for the presidency.
This is a man of cunning, ambition and hidden agendas. His relationships are not questionable; they are unfathomable.
So that leaves the moderates and seniors with a choice between Hillary and McCain. If the DNC insists on a statement over a candidate, that leaves only one realistic option.
It ain’t pretty, but the DNC should vette their candidates and quit assuming the customers are fools.

Posted by: len | April 2, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I don’t think Obama will be traveling In Pennsylvania or elsewhere with one of his earlier surrogates, Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachusetts. He’s going down the tubes fast. Even the Boston Globe, so in the tank for Obama and Patrick until recently have lost patience with the guy who promised “hope”, “change” and “Yes, we can. WELL, NO HE CAN’T!

Posted by: s. valenti | April 2, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I think our methods of electing public servants has gone astray. In this country of free and brave people who are united for the sake of all we have lost sight of what we are pursuing,and the way that we do it. It’s hard to believe that people we meet with a smile or cordial greeting during our busy days are the same people trying to tear apart someone that is not their personal choice in these comments. I think we need to curb this behavior. I also think the people who reap the most from the controversies should police themselves and quit antagonizing voters with nonstop spinning. Too much money and greed for top billing is hard to quelch. It would be nice if some of the campaign contributions could go to a worthy cause!

Posted by: Rich | April 2, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

No matter what happen everybody would vote for OBAMA but I think majority would definitely vote him in GE.

Posted by: I.A.T Smith | April 2, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I have a question about these so-called
“white, working class”.
What is that?
These people are either too stupid to realize that no other racial group in this country is referred to as such…
or they are just so caught up in their own “misplaced” anger that they don’t care!
Wake up people, “working class whites” is a means of dividing americans further
along class, and its whites who coined
the phrase!
Just like the status quo would never
associate with whites who live and work
in the mountains of West Virginia…
its the same with whites who live in the
ethnic neighborhoods of places all up and down the east coast.
The so called “working class whites” have a helluva lot more in common with
blacks, hispanics and other minorities
in this country than they ever will with
the white ruling class in this country.
And they keep voting against their very
own economic interests every year…
I don’t get it!
Wait, yes I do…
but its sad to admit that one would prefer living in the gutter than to join
forces with a people they despise.
Yep…
the american dream!!!

Posted by: Jay | April 2, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

So, Barack Obama is a member of what union?
Barack Obama has paid dues and supported what local?
Barack Obama has worked in how many union jobs?
Barack Obama has walked the picket line in how many strikes?
Barack Obama has supported his family on strike benefits how many times?
Barack Obama has passed how much legislation in the United States Senate (not the Illinois legislature) that is favorable to union workers?
As a 34-year, dues paying union member, I find no credibility or assurance in any of the hollow statements made by Barack Obama in his effort to bolster his image in Pennsylvania.
In fact, his statements are without substance and provide no indication of what he would actually do to help union members or their families.
Typical of Obama gibberish and hype, and not what we need in the White House.

Posted by: Jayhawk | April 2, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Sen. Murtha says if Barack wins the Nomination Tht Pa. will support him in the General Elections. AHHH HIllary doesnt get to have Murtha surrender his senate seat to the Republicans.
She is and always will be a unfit to be back in the House. Say good night Hillary

Posted by: Lauren | April 2, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

What polls are we supposed to be looking at? Should we look at Pennsylvania, or Kentucky, or Inidiana? Or should we look at the recent polls that show that Hillary is doing better against McCain in key states like Florida, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. In fact one poll, showed where Obama would win DC, Hawaii, and Illinois against McCain. I think that comes out to about 15 electoral votes for Obama. It’s not quite as bad as McGovern, but almost. If Obama, gets the Democratic nomination, he will not win the GE. Thank God, the people are waking up, and seeing the “real” Obama. It’s not a pretty site.

Posted by: beachnan | April 2, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

I.A.T Smith : Did you mean to change GE to caucus? LOL.

Posted by: caucus | April 2, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Obama has made reference to a “typical white person” and how this group of people is “bred.”
Perhaps in that context, one can better understand the plight of the white working class.
If that doesn’t work, try the Jeremiah Wright version of America.

Posted by: Jayhawk | April 2, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Clinton is successfully wooing wealthy Indian Americans, many of them business leaders with close ties to their native country and an interest in protecting outsourcing laws and expanding access to worker visas. Her campaign has held three fundraisers in the Indian American community recently, one of which raised close to $3 million, its sponsor told an Indian news organization.
But in Buffalo, the fruits of the Tata deal have been hard to find. The company, which called the arrangement Clinton’s “brainchild,” says “about 10″ employees work here. Tata says most of the new employees were hired from around Buffalo. It declines to say whether any of the new jobs are held by foreigners, who make up 90% of Tata’s 10,000-employee workforce in the United States.
So Hillary brings an Indian company to NY promising 200 jobs out of the deal (but how many did they give away?) and it ends up that only 10 jobs are created. I guess those Indian companies are making huge donations to Hillary’s war chest just like Israel, and lobbyists are. Is this woman really a democrat? The story continues
Lou Dobbs, an outsourcing critic, pressed her on the Tata deal in 2004, Clinton responded: “Well, of course I know that they outsource jobs, that they’ve actually brought jobs to Buffalo. They’ve created 10 jobs in Buffalo and have told me and the Buffalo community that they intend to be a source of new jobs in the area, because, you know, outsourcing does work both ways.”
This month, she made a similar case to a conference of Indian workers in Silicon Valley, saying she supported an expansion of visas. “Foreign skilled workers contribute greatly to our U.S. technological development,” she told the group via satellite.
Clinton acknowledged the strains on American workers and called for more job-

Posted by: Lauren | April 2, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

JAYHAWK,
You for-got too mention that
he voted PRESENT 100 TIMES!Thanks for
speaking for so many AMERICA, you know
your politics!!! WAKE UP AMERICA and
THINK,THINK HARD!!

Posted by: vinnie | April 2, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Lauren, are you aware that our technology industry still can not find enough skilled software and hardware engineers?

Posted by: no more distortions | April 2, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Just in, Howard Dean is talking to Florida about seating the delegates. He said he is committed to finding a way to make sure they are seated. Latest being floated by Michigan is giving Hillary her votes and giving Obama the uncomitted votes. I think Obama has made a huge mistake by not allowing the re-votes to take place. He may end up being the big loser in both votes and good will with the people of these two states. Keep on fighting Hillary!!

Posted by: Firefighter | April 2, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Firefighter,
Obama is undoubtedly taking an ELITIST position in opposition to the blue collar democrats that are out of Dean’s control. Yeah, he’s an outside alright. He’s never lifted a finger to help a union. Now he’s going to try to buy them off with cheap promises.
Every union member makes their judgement by what the candidate has done previously, not what they say they will do.
The unions will not buy Obama’s ELITIST Machiavellian moves.
=======================================
Obama got $250,000!
Rezko gets jail!
Obama doesn’t want all votes to count!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 2, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

I am growing fearful and dismayed. UNPRECEDENTED is the media who have bolstered OBAMA into this mythical character that HE IS NOT.
Let’s not be fooled! What is going on here????
HILLARY 2008

Posted by: mark | April 2, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Unions negotiate your right to make more money away, while at the same time, stealing money from you in the form of dues that are manditory and are used to fund canidates and positions that you disagree with that are against your best interest. The union and the corporations are PARTNERS, NOT adversaries. As long as the expensive worker is adequately replaced with a lesser skilled/paid (lower health care cost liability) additional two workers, unions get double the cash. How that is in the best interest of the common more experienced worker, please tell me to my face! Trust me, you have to be in a union to REALLY HATE THEM!!!

Posted by: cba | April 2, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Unreal, if the hard-working men and women of PA actually believes that Obama
gets them and what it is to be a blue collar/ working class voter in this Country then there really is no hope.
This guy is the white-wine crowd 100%.
We need someone who get down into the grit, work hard, find solutions and has the feist to carry through on them.

Posted by: alpaig | April 2, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

The Commander Guy: What is it with you and the math, what you have been saying just doesn’t add Up! Obama can not win on his own he must have the superdelegates who according to Pelosi,have the right to vote their conscience. So to say that he can win on his own is just not true, he is giong to have to use affirmative action to get across the finish line, just like Hillary! If he could get the required number of delegates we would not be where we are at now! 2+2=4!

Posted by: russell | April 2, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Bo: At least she loves her country,and thats good enough for me!

Posted by: russell | April 2, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Is Clinton still in the race?
Oh, right, she needs to continue fundraising to pay off campaign debts. Its tough when the only 3 a.m. phone calls you’re getting are from collection agencies.

Posted by: Paul | April 2, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Obama is hilarious
He tells everyone what the one to hear.
He acts like he is one of them and can relate to what they are going through.
What a Farce
So since he promised everyone, everything who are the ones who are going to be screwed?
probably the ones he called racist lol

Posted by: seah | April 2, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

If Obama was unwilling to help the working men and women who worked a Maytag then what right does he have to say that he is for Unions. His promises are like sticks easily broken! Don’t beleive me ask the Maytag workers who he lied to. He promised that he would help but he did not!

Posted by: russell | April 2, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Russell-TCG uses math for the “special education” children otherwise known as the Obama minions. Of course, thanks to the DNC “special math” no one can win without super delegates. And I hate super delegates. Get rid of that dumb anti-democratic bunch of morons. Why do they get TWO votes, once in their state and once in Denver, and the rest of us can only vote once?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 2, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Here’s a simple question that even you might answer. If all politicians lie then what are Obama’s lies?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 2, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Dogsolider: Only Democrats could devise a plan where at the conclusion no winner could be declared! The reason they came up this undemocratic plan was to over rule the masses,otherwise why are they there. You remember like the founding fathers did when they wrote the constitution and said that the House would be popularly elected but the Senate would be elected by the state legislatures, who were controlled by the wealthy and well connected! This was to be a buffer from what they called the passions of the masses. You see they were afraid of the people and so they created this check on their power! So this superdelegate thing is nothing new, except these old codgers never thought they would have to vote!

Posted by: russell | April 2, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Obama does not lie no thats too common for him, what he does is called “verbal camouflage”! Now does’t that sound better!

Posted by: russell | April 2, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Russell-I can honestly see for the first time why the democratic party lose so many presidential elections. The democratic party can’t even run its own primary. What makes anyone think we can run an entire country? This DNC must be reshaped and reorganized and its policies more streamlined for the future. First get rid of Dean and this useless group of current leaders if you can call them that. Then fix the primary system where a person can actually win without super delegates.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 2, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Dogsolide: The Truth Shall Set Us Free! What is it with all of these socialist coming out of Vermont,Leahy,Dean,Sanders? It must be something in the Ben and Jerry’s ice cream! The problem started with Democrats being forced by Jesse Jackson and others say that it was not fair to minority canidates to have winner take all because they could never get elected! So here we are and the irony is that after one gets the nomination you have to play on a different playing field you know the one where its winner take all, but we nominate someone who can’t win PA,Oh,and Fl and we keep doing what Democrats do best and that is to lose.

Posted by: russell | April 2, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

What’s this theory that since Hillary has a little cash flow problem she is not fit to run the country! Well if that the criteria then that would exclude a majority of working americans riht now! In case you have not noticed there is a recession going on millions of people who work hard can’t pay the mortgage,fill up their cars, buy food or pay for health insurance. You see Hillary has experienced the pain that the rest of us are going through everyday and therfore has a unique prespective on how it affects ordinary people. Obama being of the class who does not have to struggle to make ends meet lacks that perspective and thus does not connect with working class americans. So instead of Hillary’s problems with making end meet being a liability I say that it makes her more qualified to know what the economic problems are and how to fix them.
Hiallary always fighting for working people, and working people always fighting for her!

Posted by: russell | April 2, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Why is HRC getting off so easy on lying about NAFTA and Bosnia. She clearly supported NAFTA whil in the Whitehouse, Clearly lied about her ‘experience’ in Bosnia. Her Itinerary that has been released does not support her claims of being there for any 3 a.m. call or other relevant gov’t business. Just because she slept next to a President does not make her Presidential.

Posted by: Louis | April 2, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

guess what russell, anyone who is incapable of managing their campaign is not fit to be president and it’s apalling that you and others have no problem with it…

Posted by: tiredofthelackofknowledgeofvoters | April 2, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

i dont think those critcizing the obama campaingn are really in the united state or are facing the same issues as thoe inthe working class and those in the middle and lower clas.n is this sheer disilke of in diffrence. pls someone tell why a peson in Nigeria can even see beeter than americans criticizing a tranperent and blunt politican or a fine and rear american Obama!!!!!
GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: jeffrey | April 3, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Politics is not a do or die Affair. The President to be should be chosen from GOD. Prayer is the key point and believe with GOD all things are possible.

Posted by: charity humuri | April 3, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Most of the comments here show that America is still full of racism and separatism. As an African American in Pennsylvania (one of the most racist states in the Union) I am so disappointed by the amount of racism I still see and that has been brought out in this campaign. Race is still an issue and a huge problem that most white people don’t understand nor care about. I don’t trust Hilary or McCain and I for one WILL NOT VOTE if Hilary is given the nomination becuase she hasn’t earned it or my trust. Not looking at this as from the perspective of black and white but from the perspective that it is time these issues be addressed and that America finally unites (something I beleive will never happen). What hurts even more is the fact that

Posted by: Nicole | April 3, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Everyone,
Although I am glad we all have this opportunity to comment on issues concerning the candidates for POTUS I am saddened, as a citizen that the majority of the writings seem to be so sardonic and in some cases disparaging to leaders who are vying for the most important position in our country. Name calling and presuming guilt by association would demean most of us who so frequently offer opinions. As was professed by Jesus, “Let he without sin cast the first stone.” I ask that WE be more civil. With no intent to persuade anyone towards a religious belief I would offer that that simple anecdote would be one well taken by most contributors here.

Posted by: K Armond | April 3, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Georgia… f Hillary fought for equal education then she failed. I live in Indiana and the inner city schools have nothing compared to the Township schools. The inner city schools have to close when it is to hot becasue they don’t have air. Just like she failed with her healthcare. Give me a break she has not suceeded in those attempts. We need someone who can succeed, not someone who fails and takes credit for others success. Obama08*****

Posted by: Emilianna | April 3, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.