On “This Week,” McCain Attacks Obama on Ayers Connection
On "This Week with George George Stephanopoulos" this morning, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., unprompted, raised the issue of the connection between Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and William Ayers, a former member of the radical group the Weather Underground.
On the subject of whether McCain would attempt to attack Obama on patriotism, the presumptive GOP nominee said, "I’m sure he’s very patriotic. But his relationship with Mr. Ayers is open to question. … if you’re going to associate and have as a friend and serve on a board and have a guy kick off your campaign that says he’s unrepentant, that he wished they had bombed more."
McCain said he was most offended by Obama’s comparison of Ayers to Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., during Wednesday night’s ABC News debate. Obama had said he doesn’t subscribe to the views of all his friends, and cited Coburn’s anti-abortion rhetoric as an example.
"The worst thing of all, that I think really indicates Senator Obama’s attitude, is he had the incredible statement that he compared Mr. Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist, with Senator Tom Coburn, Senator Coburn, a physician who goes to Oklahoma on the weekends and brings babies into life," McCain said. "It’s very insulting to a great man, a great doctor, a great humanitarian… (H)ow can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings which could have or did kill innocent people?"
After Stephanopoulos pointed out that Obama had said he doesn’t agree with comments Ayers has made, McCain said, "Doesn’t agree with them? Does he condemn them? Would he condemn someone who says that they’re unrepentant and wished that they had bombed more?"
When asked, McCain said he had condemned any anti-Catholic statements made by Pastor John Hagee, an evangelical leader in San Antonio who had endorsed him.
McCain said it was "probably" a mistake to solicit and accept Hagee’s endorsement, "but I admire and respect Dr. Hagee’s leadership … of his church. I admire and appreciate his advocacy for the state of Israel" and is "glad to have his endorsement."
McCain’s attack came just a couple days after his deputy campaign manager, Christian Ferry, sent out a fundraising e-mail attacking Obama for favorable comments about the Democrat made by an official of Hamas, a Palestinian group the U.S. government classifies as "terrorist."
On WABC radio last week, Hamas political adviser Ahmed Yousef said, "actually, we like Mr. Obama. We hope he will (win) the election and I do believe he is like John Kennedy, a great man with great principle, and he has a vision to change America to make it in a position to lead the world community, but not with domination and arrogance."
Said Ferry, "We need change in America, but not the kind of change that wins kind words from Hamas … John McCain’s foreign policy provides a stark contrast to the policies of Barack Obama."
Obama spokesman Bill Burton responded to McCain’s comments about Ayers today, saying, "Unable to sell his out-of-touch ideas on the economy and Iraq, John McCain has stooped to the same smear politics and low road that he denounced in 2000. The American people can’t afford a third term of President Bush’s failed policies and divisive tactics."
The Obama campaign also pointed out that the attack seemed to contradict comments made on MSNBC last month by McCain campaign senior adviser, Charlie Black, who said, "What Senator McCain has said repeatedly is that these candidates cannot be held accountable for all the views of people who endorse them or people who befriend them. … He believes that people who endorse you, people who befriend you, are entitled to their own views, but you are not held personally accountable. That when somebody endorses you or befriends you, they’re embracing your views, the candidates’ views, not the other way around."
- jpt

Email
White House Blinks Amid Catholic Church Anger?
Navy SEAL Commander Advised: Get the Hell Out of the Media
How about some real news?
Posted by: moe | April 20, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
They really want Clinton to stay in the race as long as possible, don’t they ?
Posted by: Benjamin | April 20, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
and also on This morning-at the round table-george wills, cokie roberts and sam donaldson talked about obama plan to raise the capital gains tax on the middle class.
Posted by: jgaw | April 20, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Today’s lengthy article in The Washington Post about McCain’s incredibly bad if not evil temper is the beginning of the end for him.
Obama was not comparing Ayers to Coburn, of course; that’s exactly the same intentional misreading as the one that said he was was comparing Wright to his grandmother in the great PA speech.
He was only stressing the point that he, just as everyone else, can be friendly and on speaking terms with all kinds of different people, which DOES NOT MEAN that one shares all these peoples ideas, opinions and values.
Is that so difficult to accept or understand? Not for the majority of Americans, thank God.
Posted by: kika | April 20, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Well sure McCain knows that Obama will win the nomination. Nice of ABC and the Clinton Campaign to give fodder to McCain.
I wonder if he could have come up with it on his own?
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | April 20, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
you middle class supporters of obama
need to know about his plan to raise the capital gains tax to 28% out of the sense of fairness.
and don’t forget about the payroll tax.
it is only fair.
put that bottle of obamaade down long enough to read about this capital gains tax
Posted by: jgaw | April 20, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
No surprise to hear this tripe coming out of McCain. After all he was recently endorsed by GWB. McCain should either renounce what GWB has done during his presidency are quit the race. What about Hagee? We can go on forever, this type of “reporting of news” is simply tripe.
Why don’t you write a story about what people are really interested in about these candidates like health care, the wars, the economy and illegal immigration?
Posted by: Deward Bowles | April 20, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
deward bowles,
I am a hillary supporter
but on this morning with geo. step.
mr. mccain did seem to be starting to lean in that direction.
were you watching the “Obama,the Savior”reruns
brought to you by msnbc or cnn?
did they talk about mr. obama plan to
raise the capital gains tax to 28percent
on the middleclass?
Posted by: jgaw | April 20, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
moe – Character of a President is very important. Obama’s links to his pastor, Resko, Ayers, Farakhan and many more radical people should make people think twice is this the person whom we want to be our president.
Vote for anyone except OBAMA
Posted by: Jack | April 20, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
“Unable to sell his out-of-touch ideas on the economy and Iraq…” Uh, which campaign is taking the low road?
Posted by: Vnd | April 20, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
John McCain had the audacity to call Obama out-of-touch, then he says the United States is in the Iraq War so we can “look back with pride”?! Who’s out of touch again? I, too, have outrage, Mr. McCain, but for completely different reasons.
Posted by: Don Kadlec | April 20, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Its about time. If the relationship between the possible next president and a terrorist wont worry this country—what will? Obama should be questioned about his relationship with Ayers. Its essential. Obama worked for terrorist William Ayers. He said he was 8 when Ayers bombed New York. Nice try. But he was 30something when he served on a board with Mr. Ayers in the 1990’s, the Woods Foundation, which was a paid, underlined PAID directorship position. They worked together, attended fundraisers together, Ayers held fundraisers and was a contributor to Obama’s Chicago’s campaign, plus they are neighbors and visited each other quite often. Enough said. This relationship deserves being vetted. As an adult Obama made the decision to work with a terrorist. This is a legitimate issue, the judgment and associations of the possible nominee. Its goes straight to the reason why democrats have lost the last two elections. It goes directly to his associations with Farrahkan, Wright, Ayers, Auchi and Refko. This needs to be fully vetted.
Posted by: Leanza Cornett | April 20, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
For someone who was a punk and the worst student in his class, he should have dropped out & let Mitt Romney be our nominee. Every time I see Sen. McCain, I ask myself if this is the best the GOP can give America.
All the guy has is his hot temper, no economic plan, no plans for the environment and almost no plan for Iraq. He even had the audacity to sign bomb, bomb, bomb Iran, Isn’t Iraq enough for the American people?
Posted by: Oretega M | April 20, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
To Jack: Do you want to tell me that Obama is running for President in order to associate with terrorists???? Eh! come on!!!
Posted by: Peace | April 20, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Obama is at most qualified to be
a legal assistant.
Posted by: steve | April 20, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
McCain referred to Asians as “gooks”, is that extremely racists.
This info. would make Rev. Wrights utterance look like child’s play. McCain has sought closer ties to the extreme religious right in recent years.
The pastor McCain calls his “spiritual guide,” Rod Parsley, believes America’s founding mission is to destroy Islam, which he calls a “false religion.”
McCain sought the political support of right-wing preacher John Hagee, who believes Hurricane Katrina was God’s punishment for gay rights and called the Catholic Church “the Antichrist” and a “false cult.”
Why does America want a Cyborg for President, we should vote for anyone but McCain.
Posted by: Chan | April 20, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
frankly, obama is the main thing wrong
with America…
Posted by: ususuus | April 20, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
leanza cornett,LC
of course you are correct-but
alas, they cannot hear you,
the obama swill flows freely
they have stayed to long at the cup
and now their reasoning and thinking is
all (lc, what rymes with cup?)—— up.
middle class obama supporters check out thow in all fairness he is going to rais the capital gains tax to 28%
Posted by: jgaw | April 20, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
So low blows, dirty tricks, gaining political ground from gaffes are only allowed if the Um bama campaign is doing them.
But if the other campaigns does the same, then there is a probelm.
As always….one set of rules for the hypocrite Um Bama one set of rules for everyone else.
We just lived through that with Dubya.
So do we really need another special needs President?
Posted by: Cali girl | April 20, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
so where was mr. obama on sept. 11?
Posted by: dee | April 20, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Obamistas can you explain this one. Obama says of Ayers “He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.” Which means he does exchange on ocassion? Why? Can someone explain this to me? What a serious candidate for the presidency has to talk “on ocassion” with a terrorist?
Posted by: Gregory Perkins | April 20, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Obama:
As a black woman I am ashamed of you!~!
Posted by: kitty | April 20, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
anybody inspired by Obama’s empty,
lieing rhetoric??
Posted by: edith | April 20, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Obama is a neo-terrorist racialphobe
with no leadership abilities
beyond manipulation and plagiarism.
Posted by: yes | April 20, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
kitty, i hope it is not to late
Posted by: jgaw | April 20, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
the point of Jake’s article is that the Republicans think Ayers and Obama relationship is fair game and do intend to use it. There is much more out there on Ayers. Bombs away!!
As to McCain’s temper? I kind of like it. You know where he stands, unlike BHO. No fancy words, just straight talking westerner.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
So its a big deal for McCain to say gooks yet it is ok for BO to say typical white person or bitter clinging people
Why is it ok for BO to slide through with out any supporter stopping and seriously seeing him for what he is?
The guy is arrogant and self serving
Hamas loves him-Ever wonder why?
Farrakan just loves him
Wright just loves him
Ayers hosts a fund raiser for him
Reko deals with him-
Anybody see a pattern here?
The guy is bad news all the way around
We have only seen a glimps of his arrogant childish moods
A grown up he is not
He said he wont go negative yet as soon as the debate was over he got together a few guys from Bosnia to bash on Clinton
He has spent the entire week end bashing on Clinton and this is the new guy who doesnt do that?
Course if you asked him right now he wouls say he knows nothing about it too funny
Posted by: Betty | April 20, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Many of the folks here keep saying that Obama’s past associations with a known terrorist must be examined. I will assume that at least some of you are Bush supporters; yet I hear nothing from you about Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, the fact that the Republican led United States was directly responsible for training and equipping Osama Bin Laden, or the fact that Bush family ties to the Bin Laden family continue TO THIS DAY.
I wonder why that is? Certainly Hussein and Bin Laden have caused far, far more damage and strife in this country and the world than Mr. Ayers. I wonder why Republican ties to these known terrorists are never held up for any real scrutiny in the media?
Posted by: Zog The Obvious | April 20, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
The problem here is that Obama befriend Ayers, not Ayers befriending Obama. Obama wanted to get into the political circle of Chicago where many of these far-left liberals play and he befriended Ayers to get into that circle to get their support.
Posted by: CC | April 20, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
jgaw (at 1:08pm)-
Middle class people can’t afford gas to put in their cars, food to put on their table, are underemployed at historic rates compared to the ever-increasing cost of living, have record foreclosure rates, many have no insurance, and an unending and unethical war costing 100′s of billions of dollars and we’re supposed to be concerned about a capital gains tax? Give me a break, the only people that benefit from a low capital gains tax are the same 1% that received Bush’s tax cut for millionaires, the same tax cut that McCain wants to extend permanently. Such a scam.
Posted by: Kevin | April 20, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
ABC can’t find any real news. The only news out here now is building on the guilt by association argument against Obama.
This is all they have, so lets continue to beat the dead horse.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
A story in the Swamp says Obama’s lead (10 points a week or so ago) has vanished. Poof!
“by Mark Silva
A 10-point advantage that Sen. Barack Obama held over Sen. Hillary Clinton in Gallup’s national daily tracking poll just one week ago has vanished – with Gallup reporting Clinton’s first marginal lead over Obama among Democratic voters in a month.
Clinton’s 46-45 percentage point edge over Obama – a statistical tie, really, but the first time that Democrats have leaned in Clinton’s direction since March 18-20 – follows the contentious debate in Philadelphia last week that Obama derided as a “gotcha” fest but Clinton claimed as a victory.
The newest survey results reported Saturday come from polling April 16-18, including two days following the debate. “Support for Hillary Clinton has been significantly higher in both of these post-debate nights of interviewing than in recent nights,” Gallup’s Frank Newport reports.”
Posted by: Liz | April 20, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Countallthevotes wrote:
“As to McCain’s temper? I kind of like it. You know where he stands, unlike BHO. No fancy words, just straight talking westerner.”
“No fancy words.” “Straight talking westerner.” “You know where he stands.”
I’ve been hearing this kind of regurgitated crap applied to another certain Republican for the past seven years or so, and it doesn’t ring any truer when you apply it to McCain than it does when you apply it to Bush.
Posted by: Zog The Obvious | April 20, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
And in the same time period Newsweek’s poll says Obama is ahead by 19%, don’t you just love when the facts can be cherry-picked depending on what you want them to say?
Posted by: Kevin | April 20, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Be smart people….Obama was introduced to these guilty people by other politicians in Illinois. Alice Palmer already knew all these people. She was the one who introduced Obama to most of them.
Obama was introduced to Rezko by someone else, he was introduced to Ayers by someone else. He was working voter registration on the Southside of Chicago prior to even joining TUCC. So again, he was even introduced to Rev Wright while he was already working for the poor.
So he wasn’t seeking out these people, he was introduced to them by others.
These people were already known in Chicago political circles.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
From yes at 1:47 PM: “Obama is a neo-terrorist racialphobe
with no leadership abilities
beyond manipulation and plagiarism.”
Let the empty Right-Wing attack rhetoric begin!!
Posted by: Zog The Obvious | April 20, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
I REALLY NEED TO CALL OUT THE LIES HERE. Obama NEVER worked for Ayers, they served on a nonprofit charitable board together. AYERS NEVER HELD A FUNDRAISER for Obama, he donated a paltry 200.00 to his Senate campaign. When Obama’s state senate campaign was launched, Alice Palmer took Obama to Ayers house to introduce to politial people there. Ayers is a neighbour, free to move around the Hyde Park community, even being sought out by THE MAYOR of Chicago for help with juvenile matters. Is the Mayor of Chicago a radical terrorist sympathizer too??
Look, this mess happened FORTY YEARS ago when Obama was EIGHT YEARS OLD FOR GOODNESS SAKE. Obama was living in Indonesia or Hawaii at the time. Heck I didn’t even know about no doggone Weather whatever. Obama can’t change the past…the Chicago area has allowd this man to rehabilitate himself in the educational community. What’s Obama supposed to do., the only thing he could have done was move, cause Ayers even now is a distinguished professor of Education at the University of Illinois in Chicago. Which makes EVERYBODY THERE an accesory to terror according to the logic I see here.
Posted by: nanao | April 20, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
lainindiana,
so mr. obama should have met these people and examined them. and if he had brought “change” to chicago politics
and brought in a new group instead of falling in with these “guilty” people
then I would believe he could “change”
washington.
Posted by: jgaw | April 20, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
dee, where were you on September 11, we know that Hill the Bosnian General said that her daughter was jogging close the World Trade Buildings that day. Which again we found out was not true. But we would like to say that George and Hill are now in bed with McCAIN and ABC and FoxNews with Hannity and OReilly who are helping them to sink. Remember, Hagee who is an extremist and religious supremacist has endorsed McCain and McCain accepted that endorsement. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
sure jgaw, lets continue to blame Obama for what others say and do.
Now we can talk about what he SHOULD have done.
But all is well as long as ABC and FOX continue to insinuate something sinister in relation to Obama.
But these same people, with the huge glass houses, don’t want you to look in their backyard.
It is nothing but innuendo and distortion. And I believe the American people are waking up to the bs….
NOT. THIS. TIME.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Vanessa…If the Clinton’s would ever sell out the country, they already had eight years to do it. We know the Clinton’s love America and are proud of it. Obama and Michelle are the one’s that don’t. It’s hard to fathom any of your logic. Obama’s friends are all either terrorists or under investigation. Don’t you read to keep up? This is too important with the condition this country is in to let a loose cannon like Obama have the reins of the highest office in the nation. He is too friendly with Farrakhan, Wright, Ayers all people that hate the U.S. My God what does it take. Are you black and just want to vote color?
If that’s how this works all the whites should vote in a block and keep this idiot out of office.
Posted by: carolyn | April 20, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
(H)ow can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings
which could have or did kill innocent people?”
Is he talking about himself in Vietnam?
Flying the bombers?
Posted by: pps | April 20, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Vanessa…If the Clinton’s would ever sell out the country, they already had eight years to do it. We know the Clinton’s love America and are proud of it. Obama and Michelle are the one’s that don’t. It’s hard to fathom any of your logic. Obama’s friends are all either terrorists or under investigation. Don’t you read to keep up? This is too important with the condition this country is in to let a loose cannon like Obama have the reins of the highest office in the nation. He is too friendly with Farrakhan, Wright, Ayers all people that hate the U.S. My God what does it take. Are you black and just want to vote color?
If that’s how this works all the whites should vote in a block and keep this idiot out of office.
Posted by: carolyn | April 20, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Sure ‘for mccain’ he failed for not realizing that to George S Hannity guilt by association issues were more important instead of the economy or the war, or taxes.
I don’t think most people thought those issues were more important, so you had how many people taken aback because of the stupid questioning?
This questioning that most people could not answer effectively. Do you think your former pastor loves America as much as you do?
Please. That former pastor was on LBJs medical staff. That former pastor was a Marine. That former pastor has probably done more for the poor than any of these jokesters asking the stupid questions.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Wait until John McCain’s health becomes an issue.
Posted by: DMR | April 20, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
I am disgusted that ABC would allow their commentors to spew filth and use the N-word. Are you kidding me? I believe in free speech, but some of these comments are very threatening and malicious. Shame on you ABC and shame on all you bigots and racists. It’s 2008. Grow up!
Posted by: Kim | April 20, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
carolyn, how distorted are YOUR comments?!
The next time you see Obama at a rally, check out the people at that rally. There are more white people supporting him than there are black people.
Is that why everyone is so upset? That he seems to have white support? Those would be the intelligent people, not the illiterates that just listen to the distorted news reports.
Ask the news why they don’t want to report on anything but innuendo on Obama. People are getting tired of the bs news reports. All you have to do is read to find the truth.
Maybe you should READ about Peter Paul, or go read about Hal Turner. Those are not distortions or innuendo.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Kanobi,
First, that was Bill Clinton and not Hillary who “pardoned” Evans and Rosenberg. I put the quotes because I actually think he granted them commutations. That means after 16-17 years of incareration, they were released from prison. Note, Ayres got no sentence whatsoever. Dohrn, his wife, received about 6 months for something minor. Rosenberg and Evans were sentenced to 40-40 years. Both Ayres and Dohrn were the actual ringleaders of the Weathermen faction of the SDS. The people like Evans and Rosenberg were the mules. Note the disparity in treatment. Also, Rosenberg and Evans were contrite. They disavowed violence as a method of change. Ayres has never been contrite; he has never disavowed violence at all. He was the son of a very powerful and rich man in Chicago. I am sure that had everything to do with the disparity in treatment by the criminal justice system. Dohrn was his lover and soon wife at the time. Hence, she enjoyed the same privilege.
These commutations/pardons by Bill Clinton were grounded in the disparity of treatment, the inequity of the sentences, and the contrition of Evans and Rosenberg.
Bill Clinton has nothing to apologize about and neither does Hillary.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Who hired Ayers as a professor?
I guess Obama gets that blame to0, right?!
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Is Ayers teaching those students how to build bombs?
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
What ever said and done… Obama will not be able to win. People cannot see a person with relationship with all kind of radical people in the white house.
Hillary Supporters may rather not vote or vote for McCain … call it racism or ignorant. It is the fact.
People look for character more than policies when electing a president … and McCain seems to be a better choice than Obama.
Finger crossed for now.
Posted by: JK | April 20, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Vanessa,
I don’t think that Fox News and Hannity really “like” Hillary Clinton. I think they really fear Obama. It is that simple. He is exotic and has very weird coterie of political/religious friends and acquaintences. Let’s face it, he is wide open for attack for being unpatriotic in the traditional sense.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Seems there is a broken turntable or two here.
Posted by: Thinking | April 20, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
When it comes to bill and hillary, go google Peter Paul….are bill and hillary still not guilty?
Why? because they’re white?
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Let’s just add this to the list of people who Obama “denies” knowing or having close friendships with, until Obama’s “real” connections are outed by the media (which happens infrequently). So we have Rezko, who is syrian, and Obama said he did about 5 hours of legal work for him during a debate (OBAMA LIED ON NATIONAL TELEVISION), turns out he has been friends with Rezko for over 17 years, and Rezko helped buy the Obama mansion, and Obama told the Chicago newspapers he still considers Rezko his friend. Then there is Rev. Wright, who Obama said he never heard anything controversial in his sermons, to Obama “condemning” the words but not the man, and then trying to “disown” the words not the man at the debate. Next is Farrakhan, who Obama denies having a close relationship with, but now pictures of Obama and Farrakhan together at the million man march have surfaced, and Obama has “denounced” Farrakhan, and after much pushing, “rejected” Farrakhan. So Ayers is not a “close” friend? We are supposed to believe more of Obama’s LIES? What about Khalidi and Said? How will Obama explain those relationships? How does Obama explain his support of the Palestinians? The real news Obamanations, is that “silly” things like flag pins, saying the pledge of allegiance, putting your hand over your heart for the national anthem become IMPORTANT when the candidate in question, Obama, is showing decidedly ANTI-AMERICAN FRIENDS AND CONNECTIONS! The problem for the radical liberal left elites, is that they do not know how disconnected they are from every day Americans. Note to moveonorg.: America does not want you or need you to save us from Democracy! Obama is not qualified to be president. We need more answers about Obama’s friends…..
Posted by: rs | April 20, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
carolyn, restrain is a good attitude here, vanessa is telling you the reality. My question to you is who told you that Bill and Hill have not sold America during their days at the White House? They signed NAFTA, sold the Lincoln bedroom to guests who can pay for it, pardon fellons for money for their library, received 800 000 from Colombia for another trade agreement which will ship American jobs to Colombia, the Kyrgistangate is not yet disclosed, etc., etc. What else you want to know about Hill’s ability and willingness to sell America to China. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
@countallthevotes
Interesting… if you will not associate the mess of Bill Clinton w/ HRC, why associate Ayers w/ Obama, even after he has rejected and denounced the acts of Ayers 40 years ago, when Obama was just 8 years OLD. BTW: HRC have not denounced and rejected the wrong activities of Bill Clinton, I stated above or rather below…
If we want to blame people for the deeds of others we should do it to both candidates, and not to any specific one only… We need to be fair and balanced…
Posted by: kanobi11 | April 20, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
I’m glad I didn’t watch the show today. I have been a regular, loyal viewer for the entire time it has been on the air, but after Gibson and Stephanapolis insulted millions with their inane line of questioning in the recent “debate”, they both lost me for good. (They really had me fooled for years! I thought they were still OK. How wrong I was.)
The “Fourth Estate Broadcast Company” has fast become the last refuge of political hacks. Thank God for the internet and alternative media, where I will now reside. Sunday mornings no more on ABC. It is clearly time wasted.
Posted by: George | April 20, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
sure carolyn, another manufactured scandal. Rumor has it, this was manufactured by Ron Paul supporters.
Show me the proof, and then maybe we can talk.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
mccain/romney, all you have are manufactured innuendo that you want to make major issues. This is exactly why we got bush.
If clinton would have kept his brains in his pants, Gore would have won.
If we didn’t have manufactured scandals like swiftboats, Kerry would have won.
The voters keep getting distracted by major bs. It is time for the innuendo and insinuations to stop.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Vanessa,
The Ayres, Wright etc issues were known for well over a year before the media would even address them. They all knew. Why they held these issues? I don’t know. Hillary Clinton was dismissed from that Peter Paul case almost two years ago, as far as I can see. Teh allegations stem foom the early 90′s. Paul gets his day in court because he wants his day in court. Have you ever looked at the complaint?? Have you ever looked into Paul? You should.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
@N’Obama
If Ayers is that bad, why is he still a faculty member at the University of Chicago, teaching the Americans of tomorrow. May be we should first attack the University of Chicago, for hiring a terrorist professor…. Why are we not even bothered that a terrorist is lecturing in one of the best universities in the country. What kind of students will he produce – Terrorist?
Oh dear…. we now have a terrorist lecturing and producing terrorist students, in an American University… May be the University of chicago is also a Terrorist institution – Guilt by Association…
Posted by: kanobi11 | April 20, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
We should not judge Obama with “guilt by association?” Excuse Me – Radical Left Wing Moveonorg. Liberals – if someone is thinking of running for President of the United States of America, it would seem logical and practical to extricate yourself from some of your more “radical and terrorist and anti-american” friends before announcing your candidacy. Unless, of course, you are so stupid (in the George W. Bush sense of the word) to understand that your friends are “radical and terrorist and anti-american” and they make you unelectable. Is the correct word for Obama “filled with HUBRIS”?? It will be a very, very annoying run for the presidency for Obama since the Republicans are certain to keep bringing up “guilt by association” and silly issues like flag pins! NO WIMPYBAMA 08! NO MOVEONORG. IN THE WHITE HOUSE! NO RADICAL LEFT WING TERRORISTS IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!!
Posted by: calli | April 20, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
kanobi11, you can take it even further. Anyone who associates with the university is guilty by association then…the professors, students, donors. The list goes on and on.
Posted by: erin | April 20, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
This will be a non issue…
we need to keep focused on
can people put bread on the table
can they take care of their kids
are we safer because of this war
why does the world hate us and
most importantly how can any candidate in any logical sense look at the state of our economy with people losing there homes, our debt to China, our crumbling infrastructure, the PR campaing that the terrorists are winning thus growing in size because of a “nothing but stupid and fearfully reactional” foreign policy that one candidate is talking about continueing.
People need jobs…people need healthcare…people need to know that we aren’t going to be stupid enough to kill our military forces and economic stability by spending trillions more on this stupid war.
This “crap” that McCain threw out today will not have space enough to be any kind of focus come September…but lets teach him that now so any dust he tries to stir up gets old and cleaned up before he throws dirt in the umpires eyes.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
@N’Obama
If Ayers is that bad, why is he still a faculty member at the University of Chicago, teaching the Americans of tomorrow. May be we should first attack the University of Chicago, for hiring a terrorist professor…. Why are we not even bothered that a terrorist is lecturing in one of the best universities in the country. What kind of students will he produce – Terrorist?
Oh dear…. we now have a terrorist lecturing and producing terrorist students, in an American University… May be the University of chicago is also a Terrorist institution – Guilt by Association…
And like @Erin pointed out, you can take it even further. Anyone who associates with the university is guilty by association then…the professors, students, donors, including the Mayor of Chicago are all terrorist. The list goes on and on.
Posted by: kanobi11 | April 20, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
People need food on the table.
Aging parents need food on the table.
Children need healthcare and food on the table.
We need to relight that beacon that was America before all of this. John McCain will not do any of this…he doesn’t have the knowledge or skills to get us out of this situation with our economy and our standing in the world.
It is a no brainer.
Posted by: d | April 20, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
This is all dirt thrown in the umpires eyes.
We are spending trillions on a war.
We are in an economic crumble.
We need to turn it around.
We need our standing back.
We need our military strength back.
We need healthcare to be reigned in.
We need a President who understands what this war has cost us.
We need countries and their peoples to want to be our allies again.
John McCain won’t do that. Period.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
You people are just not getting the point here, this man is applying for the Job of Presidency of the United States of America, as a person with a security clearance, my associations are scruitinized carefully, you can be denied your clearance for relationships with individuals that may possibly have influence on you if you are prevy to counter intelligence information, so yes all of his associations need to be questioned, these people may have influence on his decision making, this is not just Obama that this is happening to, it happens to anyone who is up for a high level clearance. My security officer once told me that if I did not break of a relationship with someone that had a lot of drama going on around him, it could jeoperdize my clearance and I then had to make a decision as to what was more important to me.
Posted by: Kim | April 20, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Radical? You want radical? How about a former Republican president, who made decisions using an astrologer, and who in the 1980′s, sold chem weapons to Iraq, traded arms with Iran to support death squads in Central America, and stoked an 8 year, 3-million casualty war between Iraq and Iran. Or a current Republican President that takes weekly prayer calls from meth-addicted homosexual preachers and West Texas Armageddon Fundamentalists. And what about 9-11 and the forgotten Army Anthrax attacks on Congress? You all worry about radicalism? What do you think we’ve had for going on 8 years? Wake up!
Posted by: joey big time | April 20, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
I find it all extremely interesting….either clinton or mccain will explain away, renounce, reject, or do whatever it takes to push away their questionable issues.
BUT, Obama renouncing, rejecting, means nothing. They just keep bringing the issues to the forefront to make it appear as though he still hasn’t addressed them. Rev Wright is a good example of this.
And Farrakhan is the perfect example. He renounced him in the debate in Ohio, but apparently that wasn’t good enough. So now Farrakhan is still an issue because Obama attended the million man march. No one even talks about what the million man march was about, just that he attended.
Disingenuous, innuendo, insinuations.
Blatant double standards.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
The lack of any real news is killing me. I can’t wait for tuesday.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | April 20, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
joey, hillary supporters don’t do facts very well. They can only function on distortions and innuendo. That is what the previous clinton administration, along with the teachings of karl rove have taught them.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
You have to be tough to run for president. Everything true, half-true or not true at all is going to be brought up. Is Obama strong enough? I don’t think so.
Posted by: OB | April 20, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Obama is still a wimp when compared to the has-been McCain. You need to stick with Hillary or move to Hillary if you haven’t already. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
=======================================
There’s the Weather Underground, BitterGate, Rezko connection, Wright connection. Then there’s RapperGate, wait until that one emerges.
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 20, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Kim
It’s a non-issue many politicians know Ayres…and know him well this is stirred up politics. If you knew anything about Ayres you would see he’s kind of whacked obviously but many pols know this guy.
So your whole security thing… if this is the best they can do…it will be a losing point.
Obama is not a radical. That is part of the game they all are playing.
This is about the WAR the ECONOMY and John McCain’s inability to recognize the tie between the two…to look at borrowing more money from China (that’s a good security and economic move)…
and they would be doing all of this 10 fold to Clinton. All these non-relationships that you all think were fixed the first time around…you would quickly learn that if you just did a little personal recognizance you would see her scandals are lying in wait because obama wouldn’t go there in the primary and FoxNews is just waiting for her to be the nominee.
Do you really think that all of America knows the details of whitewater…no
the details of the cattle futures…no
the details of Vince Foster death and subsequent unauthorized clearing of his office by Hillary’s chief of staff as soon as the death happened…
or who Norman Hsu is…how many people do you think know who he is?…not many
how many people do you think know who Ron Paul is? not many
How many people do you think know that FBI files were taken out of FBI headquarters during the Clinton administration on their enemies and the details of the investigation that ensued? not many
How many Americans know the controversy surrounding her and her work on Watergate? not many
whether you believe these or not…whether you know about these or not… Americans don’t know these issues like you think… Hillary will bring a tsunami of scandals into the dialog…Obama has what, three? All of which are fairly easy to grasp are not threatening… Hillary’s …not so much.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Everything black is not radical, and that is the insinuation being made.
Stop distorting issues.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Ayers is currently a Distinguished Professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education. His interests include teaching for social justice, urban educational reform, narrative and interpretive research, children in trouble with the law, and related issues.[1]
He has edited and written many books and articles on education theory, policy and practice, and has appeared on many panels and symposia. He was tapped by Mayor Richard M. Daley to shape Chicago’s now nationally-renowned school reform program.[2]
His degrees include a B.A. from the University of Michigan in American Studies (1968), an M.Ed from Bank Street College in Early Childhood Education, an M.Ed from Teachers College, Columbia University in Early Childhood Education (1987) and an Ed.D from Columbia University in Curriculum and Instruction (1987).[1]
Posted by: Jenny | April 20, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Obama should have beat up on clinton, so he could be labeled as the angry black man lol damned if you do, damned if you don’t
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
and I should say…Hillary’s lists go on and on I only mentioned a few quick ones off the top of my head to show…if you ask the question…have these been vetted…maybe…does the American electorate know them well and the fall out and unansewered questions from each …the answer is absolutely not.
As they don’t know the details of the Keating Five.
but we would like to saty focused on the issues at hand. the war the economy healthcare infrastructure the environment education our standing in the world.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Let’s start talking about a real issue in the general election, McCain’s unsuitability for the presidency. His well-documented, out-of-control anger, complemented by rudeness, filthy language in public (even against his own wife), physical intimidation, arrogance and vindictiveness cannot be ignored. How do these serious character flaws impact his judgment? How can someone this unstable and small-minded be a serious contender for the presidency?
Posted by: 01/20/09 | April 20, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
LA in Indiana,
I agree with some of your premises. What I’m wondering, though, what is the connection of the Obama campaign to rapper Talib Kweli? Did the Obama drop promotional money to get positioning in his rap music and with other artists he’s associated with? Wouldn’t this be tantamount to payola if the campaign did such?
Are you familiar with Talib Kweli, New York City, born Talib Kweli Greene, to upper-middle class parents. This is the same Talib Kweli that has been actively promoting support for Assata Shakur, a Black Panther and cop-killer, who is on the lam in Cuba. Kweli even went so far as to visit Shakur in Cuba. I’m quite sure his hope is that Obama would pardon Shakur the cop-killer.
By the way Obama campaign promoter Kweli also has a close relationship with Minster Farrakhan. It’s just one big happy circle, ain’t it.
Kweli as well writes about revolution. He says we need politicians for the revolution.
=======================================
Obama and RapperGate, doesn’t get any better than this.
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 20, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
I’m debating about reading anything by Mr. Tapper any more. He is biased and focuses on distractions.
Distractions are ON NOTICE, Jake. (Stephen Colbert said so.) We Americans have too many real problems, as does our country to focus, on STUPID stuff. We need real info!
Come one, Jake! Go investigate something. (Hey, maybe you could find out something about Ayres and Obama before writing down just what McCain said. Now, THAT would be journalism.)
Hope to see you write some news. I’ll give you a few more chances, but then I (and many others) will just use our time to read someone who actually makes an effort to give us some news.
Good luck.
Posted by: Marilyn | April 20, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Ole Rusty wants to take “questionable” associations
and run with it?
This geezer should not overplay his hand because
he hasn’t been vetted 2008 style.
Not to mention his wife was a raging fiend now
recovered ex drug addict.
Posted by: Taylor Marsh | April 20, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Imagine a black bomber getting a professorship! Amazing….
“Ayers is currently a Distinguished Professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education. His interests include teaching for social justice, urban educational reform, narrative and interpretive research, children in trouble with the law, and related issues.[1]
He has edited and written many books and articles on education theory, policy and practice, and has appeared on many panels and symposia. He was tapped by Mayor Richard M. Daley to shape Chicago’s now nationally-renowned school reform program.[2]
His degrees include a B.A. from the University of Michigan in American Studies (1968), an M.Ed from Bank Street College in Early Childhood Education, an M.Ed from Teachers College, Columbia University in Early Childhood Education (1987) and an Ed.D from Columbia University in Curriculum and Instruction (1987).[1]“
Posted by: tony | April 20, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
He should have been hanging out with TD Jakes not Wright or Ayers there is no way he can win the general and it is not the younger ones but those of us who lived thru the sixty’s are not ready . we have some flags going back up I hope this has not set our country back fifty years
Posted by: Bishop | April 20, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
This is for Taylor Marsh: May I remind you that Betty Ford is a recovered drug addict and alcoholic…she is recognized world wide for her work in drug and alcohol addiction..and if you want to be a really good Obamaroid supporter, it’s probably not a good idea to bring up drugs and Obama in the same sentence.
Posted by: rs | April 20, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Hillary’s up by %14 in PA according to a new ARG poll out today!!!
GO HILLARY
Posted by: Michael | April 20, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
You know with this aqq Mc Caim we will be at war for years to come and not only the one we are in now……All I got to say is he better have a good runing mate in case he passes away in office and then miss rich b—-Cindy will have more millions to give her kids to spend.Spoid brats…
Posted by: honest | April 20, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Marilyn before he goes looking at Ayres and Obama…perhaps he and the other news outlets could explain the details of the Keating Five. Seems like that is not being touched and I am sure most Americans aren’t REALLY familiar with that. I bet most Americans don’t know the details.
It is the press’ duty …right to make sure they pass along anything that the American people doesn’t know…and I am sure that all these stories on the other two older candidates …America needs to be brought up to speed. Right
This is as many of you have said “the Presidency of the United States…and if Americans don’t really know all these old “vetted” stories shouldn’t the MSM clarify them…since they haven’t at all in this campaign so far?
Right?
or… we could focus on the fact that Americans are going down the tubes and some candidate wants us to just fear and attack… That is what got us here in the first place.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
lol wcm, the more distractions you guys come up, the more you make me laugh!
Amazing!
New and improved questions for Obama:
Did you beat your wife before or after she was pregnant?
Did you allow your kids to listen to any rap artist? And who would that be?
What did you have for lunch every day for the month of September in 2003?
And what I’m sure will be the all time favorite….
Did you meet with a crackhead that you did not even know, and engage in smoking crack and having sex in a limousine back in November of 1999 while you were in the midst of a campaign against Bobby Rush?
The conspiracy theories and associations are killing me!!!
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
We are on a slippery slope wit this guilt by association push. I smell McCarthism.
Posted by: Bison | April 20, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Michael,you are as good as the Clintons she is up by only 4 now.Like how you added the 10,,,,Maybe you should join her team
Posted by: honest | April 20, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
oh yeah, tell the black man who is and isn’t acceptable in his life….
tell him the correct associations for running for office.
tell him to make sure he has no questionable acquaintances.
make sure you don’t touch elbows with the grocer at the grocery store, because he knew some guy, that knew some other guy that met with Farrakhan.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
==gasp== tony, you mean Ayers isn’t a low life professor???
Maybe we should ask sean hannity, I’m sure he has all the information you need to know on this professor.
At the same time, ask sean hannity about his close association with hal turner.
And know this, when he was questioned about hal turner, he first said he didn’t know anyone by that name.
Then, maybe a minute later, he said he didn’t have anything to do with the guy.
Lets ask sean hannity about guilt by association.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 20, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Michael-
Zogby says she’s only up by 3%, 46-43, and Rasmussen agrees with the 3% at 47-44. While we’re at it, PPP says that Obama is ahead in PA by 3% at 45-42. See, aren’t polls fun when you just pick the ones that support your idea.
Posted by: Kevin | April 20, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
ARC POLL CLINTON 54
OBAMA 41
AYERS and the weatherman were very radcial those of us who had family in Viet Nam have never forgoten.
I lost a family member in Iraq in 06 I am not offened by Bosnia but by the Ayers conection .
Posted by: Bishop | April 20, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Leanza, I don’t have 990s from all of the years that Obama served on the Woods Fund Board, but from the years that I have, he was not paid. At all. The Woods Fund is good organization which tries to help communities on Chicago’s south side. The Board meets 4 times per year. They did not “work together.” Ayers did not contribute vast amounts of money to Obama – he contributed $200 for a state house run. Obama has said, on record that he finds the terrorist acts despicable.
In addition, this idea that Obama should have known is bunk. My husband was in college during the height of the anti-war movement. In San Francisco. Before all this hoopla, I asked him if he knew who Bill Ayers was (I was researching a writer). He said who are you talking about and why should I care?”
This is red-baiting, pure and simple. That’s what people should be afraid of.
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
OBAMA’S ELECTABILITY IN NOVEMBER IS
Z E R O
OBAMA IS A JOKE
OBAMA IS FAKE
OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE IN NOVEMBER.
OBAMA IS PLAYING THE RACE CARD TO GAIN
THE BLACK VOTE.
THE TIES WITH EXTREME PEOPLE SUCH THE
ANTI-AMERICAN PASTOR WRIGHT,MUSLIM LEADER LUIS FARRAKAN AND OTHERS MAKES HIM UNFIT FOR THE HIGHEST OFFICE
IN OUR LAND.
Posted by: NIcholas | April 20, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Thanks for the coverage. I love John McCain and hope that he comes back from Rove/Rushland, but I’m not holding out much hope.
There were a few things left out here – I’m guessing for the sake of space:
1) McCain pretends to be outraged that Obama would compare Colburn to Ayers. He says Colburn is a man who “brings babies to life”. That’s true. But what he leaves out is a lot. Colburn is also a man who advocates the death penalty for any doctor who performs an abortion for any other reason than to save the life of a mother (which he himself has done). You don’t have to go to a lefty rag for this information. It’s on the man’s website. It is not exactly a mainstream opinion or position. I loathe Bill Ayers, but I would not like to see doctors electrocuted and I don’t think most Americans would either.
2) Christian Ferry’s email said a bit more. Here’s what it said: “We need change in America, but not the kind of change that wins kind words from Hamas, surrenders in Iraq and will hold unconditional talks with Iranian President Ahmadinejad.” I’ve followed this campaign pretty closely. I do not recall a single time when Obama said he would “hold unconditional talks with Ahmadinejad.”
I really miss John McCain.
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Mara,
You just skipped right by the fact that Obama sat in Ayres house, along with convicted bomber Dohrn, and worked with them directly to kick-off Obama’s senate campaign. How about them apples?
========================================
Obama, saying and doing anyting to make sure you don’t get all the facts!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 20, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
BB,
Obama is the new kid on the block, compared to Hillary and McCain. He needs vetting. You’d like to overlook his defects wouldn’t you? Your attitude is to get the new kid on the block in front of the nuclear trigger as rapidly as possible. Obama is a disaster when it comes to national security. Too many negative associations with the likes of Jeremiah Wright, William Ayres, Rezko, and Talib Kweli.
========================================
Obama/Ayres ’08 — it’ll be da’ bomb!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 20, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Obama Flips Off Hillary Clinton.. Is this the kind of person we want as our President?
HERE are 2 videos of OBAMA in 2 venues in NC. Note different people behind him in each video. He raises his finger exactly when he mentions Clintons name. How can he and his supporters deny it? And, say we are grabbing for straws!!!! I think they are so braindead, they can’t discern that there are two venues where he did the same thing.
Obama you are dirty.
Posted by: Jack | April 20, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Hi WestCoastMessenger: I have not decided who I am voting for – and no one has ever called me a zombie before. I have 16 year old at home. She’ll be impressed.
Your timing is off. The fundraising dinner was in the late 90′s. I find it pretty doubtful that Ayers talked about the Weather Underground a lot over coffee during a small gathering in Chicago for a state senate seat. Ayer’s book was published in 2001 – and I believe he said “I’m sometimes asked if I regret anything I did to oppose the war in Vietnam and I say: no, I don’t regret anything I did to stop the slaughter of millions of human beings by my own government.” Did you read Ayer’s book? Do you know anyone who did? Had you heard the comments until this year? No.
I’m a lot more worried about a Presidential candidate who answers a serious policy question by singing “Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran” than with somebody who went to somebody’s else’s house in 1998 and that somebody bombed buildings when the other somebody was 9 years old. Does this remind you of anything? Guilt by association? Like the McCarthy witch hunt?
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Andrew: Did you maybe mix my comment with someone else’s? I don’t see anything I said that makes it seem that I hate black people or people of color. That would be pretty surprising to my two nieces and nephews of color and my nine great nieces and nephews of color. They all pretty much love me and I love them too.
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
The Obama people shouln’t be so dismissive of McCain’s comments. This is a signal to the DNC – whether they want to listen I guess is their problem, that Obama shouldn’t have linked Ayers name with Coburns.
If Obama were the nominee, abortion – which has largely moved off the radar – would be front and center again. I can see the attack ads now!
Democrats who are anti-abortion would be yet another group that would be lost to the republicans this year – if Obama is the nominee.
Gee thanks Obama for resurrecting yet another division in our country. Good people on both sides of this issue have been working to identify common ground. You can say goodbye to that bi-partisan work.
Just what is Obama good at these days – other than insulting and dividing people abd creating ‘wedge’ issues.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 20, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
WestCoastMessanger, you are missing the point again, do you know after Hannity, OReilly, George, it is Scaife who has paid to impeach Bill who is supporting Hillary the Bosnian General in PA? Is that not telling you something serious about the situation now? Hill’s recent supporters are all from very strange corners. We should be very worried to see this strong support for Hill from the right wing. Very much concerned that the right wing want Hill so that McCain will have an easy win, that is all. Remember the radio talk show Rush who said to all right wingers to ensure that Hill is the democratic nominee so that the 1990s will comeback in terms of replaying the scandals. Hill is unelectable and we hope that the democrats know that she cannot win against McCain because they both claim the very same Washington experience which has been a deception to every American. Wake-up. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
WestCoastMessenger: They weren’t convicted, you’ve got that one wrong. The event at the house wasn’t a campaign kick-off, either. This is red-baiting – it’s the beginning of a new McCarthyism and that is what’s scary. Here’s what Mayor Daley has to say about it – and he’s the son of Mayor Richard Daley and is not exactly known as a wide-eyed radical”
“There are a lot of reasons that Americans are angry about Washington politics,” Daley’s statement said. “One more example is the way Sen. Obama’s opponents are playing guilt-by-association, tarring him because he happens to know Bill Ayers. “I don’t condone what he did 40 years ago, but I remember that period well,” the mayor said. “It was a difficult time, but those days are long over. I believe we have too many challenges in Chicago and our country to keep re-fighting 40-year-old battles.” (LA Times)
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
McCAIN IS A DECENT,VERY PATRIOTIC MAN
WAR HERO.NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT.
HE DESERVES TO BE THE NEXT COMMANDER
IN CHIEF.
Posted by: NIcholas | April 20, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
NIcholas, you know you are born so smart that when you were asked which name you would like to have you have chosen Nicholas, you are one of these very smart babies who choses their own names at birth, Am I correct???Let us grow-up a bit. Do you remember where Hillary’s name came from in her own words? Hill the Bosnian General is unelectable. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Psst…The reason why the Ayers issue has legs, is because Ayers himself stated he didn’t do enough against the govt within THIS CENTURY.
Nevermind, there is something off about him blowing up buildings and never serving a day in jail.
Here is Um Bama downplaying a relationship of yet ANOTHER person who has actively fought against the US Govt in terrorists fashions, instead of like MLK did.
So who’s rhetoric is he stealing Ayers or MLKs?
It is important to know when voting for a President. Like it or not!
Posted by: Cali gil | April 20, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
NO NIcholas,
The name “Hussein” is a semitic Arabian name meaning “handsome”. There are Arabian Christians named “Hussein” and they are persecuted TODAY much in the same way you hear about in a Sunday sermon how the 1st Christians were. “Muslim” is a person that practices “Islam”. Islam is a religion, and is therefore not exclusive to any culture or naming preference. There are MUSLIM WHITE PEOPLE in Eastern Europe that look like you, dress like you, but pray to Allah.
Please let go of your ignorance and latent bigotry. If the name “Hussein” is keeping you from considering Obama, then do a Google search and learn something about the name. And BTW, I’m an OIF veteran just back from Iraq. You sound like that woman on the ABC debate near destitution, but she’s worried about a flag lapel pin.
Posted by: ROB | April 20, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
N’Obama
I think you are right we are protective of a man who is trying to raise the dialog as best he can… because we know this will be our one shot to do this for a very long time.
I think it is not so much defensive of him…it is more that we are defensive against “it”. The “it” being the darker side of humanity that shows through when debating “how to be happy and how not to hurt other people”…that is what Obama is speaking to.
The balance of life…how to be a good person and receive that treatment yourself…as hokey as that may sound that is what he stands for, for many of us. A smart thoughtful, up-to-date leader who puts “hope” and “work” and “the voices of the people” before “fear”, “simplicity” and “power as an influencer”
We are not fools… we are listening.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Kim, Great Post @ 3:19 p.m. Everyone needs to read it.
It goes to judgement. If a mid-level civil servant knows that affiliations matter to their job – and by extension to their country, then, you’d expect a presidential candidate to know as much.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 20, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
dl, that all sounds good, and Barack came across as a good man, until his mentors, pastors, associates, and his wife’s speeches, etc. all came to light.
Now he just looks like a guy who’ll say anything to get elected.
And you supporters just look like a bunch of people who will believe anything you’re told, when facts show the opposite.
Posted by: Jo | April 20, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Obama supporters just don’t seem to get that it’s the fact that Ayers is unrepentant – and, depending on where he put the emphasis in those famous remarks following 9/11, you could infer that he might have been speaking admiringly of Osama bin Laden.
“I regret that WE didn’t do more”. Sounds even worse than the reports.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 20, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
kanobi posted:
“Interesting… if you will not associate the mess of Bill Clinton w/ HRC, why associate Ayers w/ Obama, even after he has rejected and denounced the acts of Ayers 40 years ago, when Obama was just 8 years OLD. BTW: HRC have not denounced and rejected the wrong activities of Bill Clinton, I stated above or rather below…
If we want to blame people for the deeds of others we should do it to both candidates, and not to any specific one only… We need to be fair and balanced…”
Kanobi,
You completely miss my point. Bill Clinton’s commutations of the sentences of Evans and Rosenberg were based on the disparity of treatment of them (40-50 sentences), the fact that they had already served 16-17 years, and their contrition for the violence. Now juxtapose their treatment by our criminal justice system with that of Ayers (he served not a day and got no sentence), and Dohrn (she served about 6 months on a very slight charge). Note, Ayers and Dohrn show no contrition whatsoever. Also add in the fact that Ayres’ father was a very wealthy and powerful businessman who used all his chits to get his son and Dorn off and he did.
Again, the commutations by Bill Clinton were based on the inequity of treatment, the disparity of sentences, and presence of contrition.
Bill Clinton did nothing wrong.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
S. Valenti: Clinton and Obama have identical positions on abortion. And I admire both their statements – because it is the first time I have heard pro-choice candidates say that there is a moral dimension to this issue which we shouldn’t pretend isn’t there. A majority of Americans (just a little over half) are pro-choice.
But I have never met anyone in my life, including my Mom, who had 11 kids, who has said that doctors who perform abortions should be electrocuted, like Senator Colburn says.
I think it takes someone with remarkable character to be able to set aside your differences and work with a colleague toward something you both believe in. I think that is what character is all about.
Posted by: mara | April 20, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Is anyone else suspicious of those posters who purport to be opposed to Obama who mention race? Are they actually pro-Obama people who are playing the race card?
I wonder.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 20, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Why does anyone care about Ayers and his association with Obama. This was 40 years ago, Obama was a child. I douby he even remembers. Now they live in the same neighborhood, kids go to same school, he was at his house once. Ayers is well respected in the community. You guys are just paranoid and reading way to much into this. You must listen to Rush and the rest.
Posted by: erin | April 20, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Erin, yes the fact that a man is respected who admits he wishes he’d done more bombing is very disturbing.
The fact that Obama has no problem with that is equally disturbing.
The fact that Obama has no problem with that and wants to be president is THE MOST DISTURBING OF ALL.
Posted by: Jo | April 20, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Just imagine if Ayers was an abortion clinic bomber and said he wishes he’d one more and has no regrets?
Now imagine McCain had fundraisers at his house.
McCain wouldn’t stand a chance in hell.
Posted by: Jo | April 20, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
mara: Coburn may want a LAW penalizing physicians who perform abortions (he’s never going to get it though), but as far as I know, he’s never bombed a clinic or advocated bombing one. Or, rubbed America’s noses in the horror of Ground Zero.
Posted by: s. valenti | April 20, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
N’Obama
I have heard hate from some Obama supporters…and it comes out of frustration as many of the Clinton supporters does.
But that is not what this candidate speaks to…it’s not what he speaks of. He has many supporters that are not him… but he is not them.
I have met all the candidates … (I have said this many times about my time last year in NH) …All the candidates want to be President …no doubt…but his motivation (and look at his policies AND his words) are based on normal common sense brains…
When you clear it all away and you watch them all in a room …a small room (which i have been in with almost all of them at one time or another during all the campaigning in NH for a YEAR)… There is absolutely no doubt that
McCain was like my dad who has gotten away from the work of “hope” and “noble choices” as a way of America succeeding. I think that was because he is still that teenager trying to fulfill his dad’s long lost dream.
Hillary had more in common with Barbra Streisand or Lilith from cheers to be (simply honest) than she did with Bill Clinton. I could not help but see her comments were about “the game” and her own coronation. I say that not to be a jerk…I say that because she was like that Senior Executive that interviews you for a job and makes sure you know …that chances were you weren’t going to get it but smiles through it anyway…if that makes sense. I have issues with any parents that BOTH run for the President all the while their child (and if Hillary had run first I would have said the same thing about Bill) as supportive as she is goes around putting her parents again up on the pedestal and first to her own life.
I am not attacking her for that… I think that is this thing that I kept staring at Chelsea at any event she happened to be at in NH… and I thought…well it’s hard not to pity her a bit. I am sorry if someone finds that offensive…but it’s how I felt and that was through all the other issues I have with Sen Clinton…and those have exponentially increased since then.
Obama seemed like his sense…was my sense. There were no gaps…there were no answers to details that didn’t make sense or felt political.
But you all think that he is this bad guy. Most Americans are much smarter than that.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
s.valenti, do you know that Scaife has endorsed Hillary today? Everybody knows that Scaife is the rich guy right winger from PA who has spent more than 1 m 200 00 of his own money to help impeach Bill Clinton. That is the very bad association on Hillary’s side, the right wing is helping her to win the nomination so that their base can be united against her and get McCain in the White House. So the only one people who are smearing Obama’s race is from Hill and her new friends’ side. Hill has lost already, because she is in bed with FoxNews, Hannity, OReilly, Scaife and McCain, that is her end, she cannot claim to be a democrat anymore, she went back to her sources, the republican party. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Well it was vivid for those of us that lived thru it thats why it matters while all are friends were dying in Nam those lucky enough not to have to go the weatherman were blowing up city’s here at home burning the flag and treating boys that had no choice bad.
Posted by: Bishop | April 20, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Appearances can be deceiving. Ask John McCain. Keating Five. Look it up. On his Keating Five experience, McCain said: “The appearance of it was wrong. It’s a wrong appearance when a group of senators appear in a meeting with a group of regulators, because it conveys the impression of undue and improper influence. And it was the wrong thing to do.”
I predict McCain will conveniently forget the “appearance” of wrong-doing and argue that things are as they seem. It’s politics as usual. It’s why Obama has my vote.
Posted by: HoldenLitgo | April 20, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
…and just to throw a little light on the abortion argument that has broken out…
if you all do vote for McCain or not at all…in either direction chances are …abortions in most of the country WILL be illegal again.
He has already put that as a lead talking point (and he did it days before Obama mentioned Coburn)… and the Supreme Court probably only needs one more judge to overturn.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
N’Obama
If you make that the scale…all of them have very disturbing practices they have gone through and been involved in in the past. It’s just the other two candidates have not had their issues talked about during this primary.
…b.e.c.a.u.s.e…. one candidate is trying not to go there… because the country has issues that need to be dealt with intelligently…not politically.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
I can’t believe that people are actually so gullible to believe anything Obama says.
He can’t even unite his own church & community. Why would he be able to unite the country?
He can’t. All words. And he doesn’t mean a word of it.
Posted by: Jo | April 20, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
dl, no I don’t think McCain has had fundraisers of the houses of unrepentent terrorists.
But keep trying. lol.
Posted by: Jo | April 20, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Mara,
Really, red-baiting? So this is where the Obama campaign heads when the race card doesn’t work. Sorry, the Weather Underground is a lot different than communists. They were sort of like anarchists, but only sort of. More along the ilk of the Earth Liberation Front, but their causes were even less intellectual than ELF. Robbing banks? Red-baiting? Come on.
========================================
Obama and Ayers ’08, it’ll be da’ bomb!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 20, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
After the Rev Wright revelations I haven’t seen any Obama signs or bumper stickers anymore.
Posted by: Mere | April 20, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
westcoastmessenger
you are a trip… “hope” “common sense” “logic”
“quick…who’s this rapper that supports Obama” “quick he’s a terrorist! Quick…UNPATRIOTIC… he’s UNPATRIOTIC…9/11!!! 9/11!”
Focus on real things. There is one candidate who gets it, one candidate who has the best chance of getting us back on track using logic, one candidate who gets us to be the toast of the world if he is elected and that would be Barack.
and you all know it…your just frustrated and angry. Sometimes out of frustration my dad says we should “bomb the whole middle east”… and he says “Hillary is satan and she killed Vince Foster and tried to cover it up” It is out of frustration and anger (and trust me he’s not an obama supporter lol)…
The country needs hope and logic. That’s Obama.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Earth to McCain:
Ignore your latest advisor Karl Rove, straighten out the Straight Talk Express, and focus on telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.”
You know what you’re saying about Obama is totally misleading.
Posted by: Tom J | April 20, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Jo
Mccain had fundraisers and actively seeked the support of a minister who yes, “hates” an awful lot of people.
and there are many people in his party that have done a lot of very bad things…and many of them, yes, he has been associated with.
and yes, many very very bad people have raised money for John McCain.
I think he would even tell you that if he wasn’t running against Barack right now and need this to become President.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Bishop – I agree with you. I think we’ve never really paid our debt to the Vietnam Vets – the ones who came home and the ones who didn’t. And I think that the anti-war movement was full of a bunch of trust fund babies on holiday. But Barack Obama was 8 years old during the Tet Offensive.
And I know you’re not going to agree with me on this and you don’t have to, but I think one way to pay that back is to make sure that it doesn’t happen again – and it is. Men and women are dying in a war to set up an Islamic (as in Muslim) Shiite government. Kids are going on three and four rotations. And he is against giving the GI Bill to Iraqi Vets. Why? And John McCain is talking about another war with Iran. I want to know whether he supports the draft and how he possibly thinks we can fight a war in another country without it. I believe in the draft and I don’t think there should be student deferments. I think the Bush kids should have to go to war the same as everybody else. But people are talking about what will scare people in a general election? It’s simple. A five-letter word: DRAFT.
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
WestCoatsMessanger, if I was Hill I would hope for a support from Farrahkan et al than from Scaife, the right winger, who has helped and financed with hsi own money the impeachment of Bill Clinton, her beloved huseband. Do you want to say that Hillary has the same views and positions as Scaife? Hillary is unelectable, that is the reality. Going to bed with republicans will not help her at all she has lost her principles. She is losing the basis and the democratic party itself by association with right wingers like FoxNews, Hannity, OReilly, Scaife et al. Sleeping with the enemy will not win a war. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
DL,
The frustration I see occurring in the campaign is coming from Obama, who seems to have a tic in his middle finger when talking about Hillary. That’s just juvenile dude. You want this guy as President? You gotta be kidding us.
========================================
Obama, if you vote with your middle finger!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 20, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Mara,
It sounds like from your perspective Obama is hopelessly stuck in a time warp at age 8. Is that how you account for him giving Hillary the finger? By the way, did he learn that trick from Colbert? Slick, Obama, slick!
========================================
Obama, is he elite enough for you?
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 20, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
BKMC,
You definitely have made it clear that you like the Farrakhan and Obama connection. I’m still waiting to hear your thoughts about what you know about Talib Kweli.
========================================
Obama/Kweli ’08 Free Assata Shakur Next!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 20, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
WestCoastMessanger, grow-up a bit, you are regurgitating what the right wing FoxNews has reported about the “finger issue” which is stupide as usual. Please do not go that low and accuse Obama for a gesture which has never happened. Despite any difficulties or heated exchanges between the 2 campaigns, Obama has a deep respect for Hillary and vice-versa. Nobody can believe one minute that these two senators will not respect each other. Let us not get the dialogue too low. Hill is unelectable and that is the reality to live with, but going to bed with republicans and the right wing 9Foxnews, Hannity, O’Reilly, Scaife, etc.) will not help her, she has lost her soul and her principals. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
YOu know,it’s Jesus Christ who is the savior.
It seems Obama joined the church because he thought the savior was he himself!
Posted by: Douglas | April 20, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
WCM: You are right. And I was wrong on another thing – I think the event was much earlier. “One introductory event took place at the home of Ayers and Dohrn.” is actually what the article said.
The “Obama Zombie Mara” part doesn’t add much to your argument. It also doesn’t faze me. I live with teenagers.
Red-baiting is guilt by association. It’s what McCarthy did and what you are doing. Did Obama protest the Vietnam War? Did he bomb something at age 9? Did he kill someone? In the 50′s, if you knew someone who was suspected of being a communist, which meant that your purpose was to destroy the United States, then you were guilty by association. If the press and the right-wing media start this, which it looks like they are going to, it’s not going to destroy the Obamas, it’s going to take us back to the one of the darkest times in American history when friends reported on friends – or lied about friends to get off and the free press was censored. Does this sound like America? It sounds like China to me.
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I’m confused about the Ayers issue. On his website, Ayers writes: “Terrorism is never justifiable, even in a just cause… I’ve never advocated terrorism, never participated in it, never defended it.” Since Ayers was never implicated in or prosecuted for the Weather Underground bombings, why did Senator McCain (and news pundits) state that Ayers wanted to “…set more bombs…”
Posted by: tk99 | April 20, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
WestCoastMessanger, you are parsing my words, you are a honable guy I think, let us remain that way. What I hate to see is that Hill the Bosnian General is being embraced by right wingers like Hannity, OReilly, Scaife and Foxnews. She is abandoning her party and her people, that is what is wondering me. She has to reject these endorsements and support which are hypocritical and serve to divide the democrats and prevent them to occupy the White House in 2009. McCain cannot win but with Hill’s help he may be able to win. That is my concern. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
N’Bama: This is directly from Coburn for Senate 2010
On the death penalty, he said: “I favor the death penalty for abortionists and other people who take life.”
He said he performed two abortions to save the lives of mothers who had congenital heart disease, but opposes the procedure in cases of rape.
Sorry, but it’s the truth. John McCain told a half-story.
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Just because Oprah likes Mr. Obama, doesn’t mean I have too. I like Oprah, don’t get me wrong. Just because Mr. Obama speaks well doesn’t mean he is getting my vote. I want someone with experience and he just doesn’t have enough in my book. I am a registered democrat and if he runs against Mr. McCain, I will vote Republican.
Posted by: Candi | April 20, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Jake, someone needs to report on the way taking the country of democrats that refuse to vote GE for Obama. Many pundits don’t believe it, but someone needs to. IT IS REAL.
Posted by: dem process is toast | April 20, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
This one is absurdly thin and McCain ought to get his mouth washed out with soap.
Obama must be a real stand up guy since McCain and Clinton can only get to him by playing the old association game.
Maybe it is time that some journalist took McCain and Clinton through the guilt by association vetting machine? I bet any of them could be painted as an unelectable radical nut case in no time.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | April 20, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
let me see if i get it. if obama gets republican votes or endorsements he is a uniter who has cross party appeal. if hillary gets republican endorsements it is a conspiracy?
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 20, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Hillary can’t even run her own campaign how in the heck is she going to run this country.
Posted by: erin | April 20, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Jackie
McCain actively campaigned for Hagee’s endorsement.
but ALL of this doesn’t matter when gas is going to be over 4$ a gallon…
this will not be what people are distracted by this election …it’s one thing when people are concerned …it’s another when they or their neighbors are losing their homes…their parents homes…their retirements… jobless and homeless rates go up and people aren’t buying anything at Xmas because the grocery bill is through the roof and all the money for school programs are being overtaken by the fact that the government can’t pay to subsidize state and local budgets.
people won’t be able to pay for the food on their table never mind healthcare… and McCain puts forward horrible economic plans and wants to continue a multi-trillion dollar war.
Period.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
coe-your suggestion that we deserve to know what kind of prescription medications mr. mccain may or may not be taking-pales in comparison to obama’s self-declared cocaine use.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 20, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Ah, what about the Bush connections with the Bin Laden family? McCain welcomed both Bush endorsements with open arms. Doesn’t that make McCain associated with the most wanted terrorist? McCain attacks Obama because he knows he can beat Hillary in November. Both Clinton and McCain will lose. Barack Obama will be president. Enjoy the ride folks.
Posted by: Matt | April 20, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
BKMC..
No one should see anything wrong about Obama’s strange choice of bedfellows like Rezko, Auchi, Ayers, Farakhan and, of course, the beloved pastor Wright; they should just embrace the vision of these people and his Hamas associates parsing policy in the Oval Office to get that warm fuzzy feeling.
No one should mind that Obama voted in favor of LATE TERM abortion, either, or that he left the senate table without voicing any vote at all at all in at least 135 instance.
I don’t quite understand why anyone would want such a person leading this country… but everyone is entitled to his O N E vote.
HOWEVER….do NOT say the G-D has anything to do with his campaign!
Posted by: eyes enormously wide open | April 20, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
steve
the problem is
Hillary’s solutions either won’t work, can’t pass in a polarized congress… or are the same as Obama’s.
that’s the truth.
she is used to old politics…or should i say the system that seems to be in full swing over the past decade …where nothing has gotten done.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Obama didn’t need to sit in church each Sunday to hear Rev. Wright’s anti-american, racist sermons.
Obama was well groomed by Rev. Wright’s views. He molded him and inspired him the twelve years the two of them have been UNCLE and NEPHEW.
He got them “PRIVATE” talks from his uncle, Rev. Wright!!!!
He knows
Posted by: m | April 20, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
steve
the problem is
Hillary’s solutions either won’t work, can’t pass in a polarized congress… or are the same as Obama’s.
that’s the truth.
she is used to old politics…or should i say the system that seems to be in full swing over the past decade …where nothing has gotten done.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
NIcholas, you may have chosen beyond your name the color of your skin before birth. Obama is black does not mean anything, he is where he is because of his leadership vision and great managerial skills. He has organized the strongest camapign you will not see in a life time. Hill the Bosnian General is now in bed with Hannity, OReilly, Scaife, FoxNews. That is the end of the democratic party, she has joined the right wing. That is not reaching out to the over side but a plan being prepared to weaken the democratic party and get McCain in the White House. Hillary is unlectale she cannot win the nomination and we all know that reality. Remember that Scaife has put more than 1 m of his own money to impeach Bill Clinton while we all were supporting him. Hill is losing her soul and principals, that is the difference. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 20, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
1st choice, Hillary
2nd choice, McCain…no other choice.
Posted by: dem process is toast | April 20, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Smart people need proof of all this political spin.
You know like lawsuits, investigations, fines…
Oh that’s right McCain and Clinton have those.
Barack has had none.
Zippo. Nilch. Nada.
They all have this crap. But because Obama is new …you all spin it and spin it…but Obama supporters will make sure the American people know the actual issues that are at stake.
You all will have a very tough time winning this time with spin. It is about our standing in the world, food prices, gas prices, crumbling infrastructure, economy, economy war, war war…losing afghanistan now and a military that is in a horrible state of affairs and one candidate acting like she some military thing and the real military guy wanting to crush the spirit and stamina of our military.
…not to mention the economy.
and that definitely doesn’t make us safer.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
So if Mr. Obama condemns the actions of Mr. Ayers and the words of Rev. Wright and the swindling of Mr. Rezko and the slurs of Mr. Farkkhan and so on and so forth, will that erase the connections he has had in the past?
I am quite surprised that people are considered fools to say “Yes, Mr. Obama condemns all the people he was connected with in the past. He is now purified and can lead all Americans. Perhaps, he will teach all of us a lesson for not being submissive to the Islamic Fundamentalists because we had tried to hold their reign on terrorism.”
After all, he and his surrogates have been appealing to the American guilt to put him in the White House. While we feel guilty for not having a black president, we might also feel guilty for
everything Mr. Bush did and jump to the extreme and open our borders to fundamentalists.
Like Mr. Kerry says that Muslim nations (like Syria, Iran?) will respect us if we elect Mr. Obama. What a joke!
Posted by: Onlooker | April 20, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
McCain is showing early that his straight talking, honorable image is a crock. He is resorting to the lame tactics of personal destruction just like we have seen over the years. Won’t work this time because the public is fed up with that nonsense. BTW, if he wants to play dirty, then some democratic group may just decide to air his pathetically low blow at a republican dinner back in the 90′s
where he made disparaging remarks about Chelsea Clinton’s appearance. Now there’s a leader for this country!
Posted by: mike | April 20, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
How come the Catholic Church can find great succesors, but we here in AMerica, can’t find a decent, respectable candidate to run for president!
Posted by: STELLA | April 20, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
westcoast…
by the way
that is the only reason i can keep these blogs up on my screen and partake…because I am lucky enough after years of work to be able to now.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Does anyone think the American public will buy this crap again after what they have been put through the last 8 years? McCain the straight talker, man of honor has no plan for the war, the economy, the environment, healthcare, fuel prices etc. So what does he do, negative attacks. How disgusting.
American’s will not tolerate this any more. They learned from the last disaster called Bush.
Posted by: Mike | April 20, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Stella, No. McCain’s statement was a half-truth. Coburn does apparently still work as a doctor. And I am not going to argue with anyone about pro-choice/ pro-life. I’m the 11th of 11.
Obama made his comment because Coburn has stated that the death penalty should be applied to any doctor who performs an abortion (except when the mother is endangered). It is on his website – Coburn for Senate 2010. Obama worked with the Senator on legislation for transparency for federal spending. I believe his point was that he didn’t agree with the man’s positions or record, but he was willing to put that aside to work on something he believed in. You don’t have to agree – and I imagine you won’t, but it made sense to me – not because I am an Obama Zombie, but because I have done community work – some in jails – and it only works because you’re willing to put differences – and the past behind – and think only of who you are trying to help.
Posted by: Mara | April 20, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
I feel bad for McCain
Here is a guy who has wanted to live his fathers dream and last time he tried to play it a bit more above board and run…
he got slammed by the machine.
This time he says screw it because that “dream” and his dad’s legacy…and Grandad’s legacy, for that matter are too important and it’s a moral choice that he gets stuck with HE has to be President, just like Clinton it’s there last shot… but the the country has moved on looking to someone who gets the future.
You can look at him and see that aging man who missed his opportunity because GW played dirty and now he is like Rocky 16 …and he is watching his life long dream slip away because the country needs to look forward.
That’s really sad.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
coe your question regarding why mr. mccain’s daughter does not have a job suggests, what? i would be more concerned with what kind of psychological damage obama’s daughters have sustained as a result of sitting in a church that preached so much vile hatred for america. i resent people that hate america yet have advanced their lives (politically and economically) as a result of being americans. yes things are bad right now, yes mistakes have been made, yes we could have done better, but to bite off the hand that has sustained us will only weaken us as a nation. their is a difference between constructive criticism and outright hatred for everything american. i am first and foremost an american, then a hispanic, then a democrat, then a woman, and proudly a hillary supporter.
Posted by: sonia trevino | April 20, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
sluggo
I’m not … god knows I pay enough into it. ugh.
Posted by: dl | April 20, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
NYT 2001 on Ayers:
Ayers has written a book, ”Fugitive Days” (Beacon Press, September). Mr. Ayers, who is 56, calls it a memoir, somewhat coyly perhaps, since he also says some of it is fiction. He writes that he participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, of the Capitol building in 1971, the Pentagon in 1972. But Mr. Ayers also seems to want to have it both ways, taking responsibility for daring acts in his youth, then deflecting it.
”Is this, then, the truth?,” he writes. ”Not exactly. Although it feels entirely honest to me.”
But why would someone want to read a memoir parts of which are admittedly not true? Mr. Ayers was asked.
”Obviously, the point is it’s a reflection on memory,” he answered. ”It’s true as I remember it.”
Mr. Ayers is probably safe from prosecution anyway. A spokeswoman for the Justice Department said there was a five-year statute of limitations on Federal crimes except in cases of murder or when a person has been indicted.
Mr. Ayers, who in 1970 was said to have summed up the Weatherman philosophy as: ”Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that’s where it’s really at,” is today distinguished professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago …
He went underground in 1970, after his girlfriend, Diana Oughton, and two other people were killed when bombs they were making exploded in a Greenwich Village town house. With him in the Weather Underground was Bernardine Dohrn, who was put on the F.B.I.’s 10 Most Wanted List. J. Edgar Hoover called her ”the most dangerous woman in America” and ”la Pasionara of the Lunatic Left.” Mr. Ayers and Ms. Dohrn later married.
”Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon,” Ayers writes. .
Between 1970 and 1974 the Weathermen took responsibility for 12 bombings, Mr. Ayers writes, and also helped spring Timothy Leary (sentenced on marijuana charges) from jail.
So, would Mr. Ayers do it all again, he is asked? ”I don’t want to discount the possibility,” he said.
Mr. Ayers has always been known as a ”rich kid radical.” His father, Thomas, now 86, was chairman and chief executive officer of Commonwealth Edison of Chicago, chairman of Northwestern University and of the Chicago Symphony.
In 1967 he met Ms. Dohrn in Ann Arbor, Mich. She had a law degree from the University of Chicago and was a magnetic speaker who often wore thigh-high boots and miniskirts. In 1969, after the Manson family murders in Beverly Hills, Ms. Dohrn told an S.D.S. audience: ”Dig it! Manson killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they shoved a fork into a victim’s stomach.”
In Chicago recently, Ms. Dohrn said of her remarks: ”It was a joke. We were mocking violence in America. Even in my most inflamed moment I never supported a racist mass murderer.”
In 1970 came the town house explosion in Greenwich Village. Ms. Dohrn failed to appear in court in the Days of Rage case, and she and Mr. Ayers went underground, though there were no charges against Mr. Ayers. Later that spring the couple were indicted along with others in Federal Court for crossing state lines to incite a riot during the Days of Rage, and following that for ”conspiracy to bomb police stations and government buildings.” Those charges were dropped in 1974 because of prosecutorial misconduct, including illegal surveillance.
During his fugitive years, Mr. Ayers said, he lived in 15 states, taking names of dead babies in cemeteries.
And if there were another Vietnam, he is asked, would he participate again in the Weathermen bombings?
By way of an answer, Mr. Ayers quoted from ”The Cure at Troy,”
History says, Don’t hope
On this side of the grave.
But then, once in a lifetime
The longed-for tidal wave
Of justice can rise up
And hope and history rhyme.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Erin, Not at all. I know my candidate and she has run her campaign well. I trust her and believe in her message, I also believe that she has the will and the ability to get things done. I give my money to her freely and support what she has done with it. On the other hand I don’t know much about Barrack other than he offers a good speech and a lot of new voters. He is great at fundraising and can easily manipulate the direction of the campaign when it suits him. He can dish out negativity and attacks but can’t take them. he associates both past and present with people I would not want near my White House. He has the Audacity to pretend he is scratching his cheek while everyone knows he really was giving an obscene gesture, twice in one day. I am awake, alive and have not bought into the oratory skills of a political pubescent. I respond on topic and do not use these blogs as another way to advertise for a specific candidate. Thank you.
Posted by: Chipo1965 | April 20, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Obama has clearly explained now all of you that dare question can just shut completely up. You see, Obama has effectively shot down all possible criticism, now and forever, by detailing how we, “The American People” want all of this questioning to stop. You see, his close association with a convicted terrorist (a racist who laments not be able to accomplish more bombings) and his 20 year adoration of his (another incredibly racist, completely absurd, drenched in hate, and totally whacked-out) father figure..why we don’t care about any of this.
No, we are more concerned with the “wedge issues”, such as education, “free” health care, the (terrible) economy, and the war (for oil of course) in Iraq. Issues such as the on-going invasion by people illegally storming our borders, our tax burden, and how he intends to fix the economy by raising taxes and allowing the government to intervene and regulate the free market are not what we care about. This are the “same old Washington politics”, you understand, and “we do not need” to hear anymore of it.
I must have missed it, but somewhere along the line he became qualified to decide what we need to hear, and what we don’t.
This guy is starting to frighten me, and thank you ABC for daring to be the only one in the major media with the onions to ask him a hard question. You might just restore my faith in modern journalism if you keep this up. In the meantime, I want to know why Obama refuses to put an American flag on his lapel..Whether he thinks I need too or not.
Posted by: Karpy | April 20, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Why isn’t anyone writing stories about how Hillary Clinton is only running for the votes of super delegates. She admittedly and whole heartedly does not believe that this election should be based on the popular vote of normal non-super-delegate citizens. Moreover, she bluntly states that the votes of ordinary citizens of the United States of America should not amount to any value whatsoever in this election. I heard her interviewed on NPR stating that pledged delegates who were appointed by elections in previous state primaries should ignore the vote of the people and vote for her regardless of percentages. Please, listen for yourself via this link to npr.org’s recording of the interview by Michele Norris. She mentions this at around the 6min mark. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89476099 Afterwards, ask yourself, “does she care about us?” I demand fair coverage by our evidently spineless commercial media!
Posted by: Philadelphious | April 20, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Moe….Obama is a stooge. It doesn’t get any more real than that.
Posted by: Obama Got Smoked | April 20, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Mara,
The problem is that the Ayers/Dohrn connection will be exploited in the GE. It is a source of great vulnerability. That is the reality. The Republicans have attacked Bill Clinton, Mike Dukakis, Al Gore, and John Kerrey for being unpatriotic when they had nothing to really go on. This time they have quite a hook. It matters not whether it is, in fact, circumstantial or guilt by association, in your eyes. It matters that this is a gift to the Republicans for the GE. It is a windfall!!
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Phildelphius,
What about FL and MI voters?? Why won’t Obama agree to count them?
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
So how do we know that Ayers isn’t planning on planting any bombs? Perhaps he considers Iraq another Viet Nam?
This is no distraction it is an issue. Obama claims he only did 3 or 4 hrs legal work for the slumlord Rezko and it turns out they are lifelong friends and Rezko is his fundraiser and benefactor as late as 2005 (right before Rezko got indicted). And while Rezko bundled money for Obama’s campaign 11 slums in obama’s district went without heat…are you kidding me this is an issue! This is Obama’s record.
And Ayers is not just a guy that “lives in Obama’s neighbood” He is a friend that sat with him on the Woods Foundation Board where they paid to have studies done to take away the 2nd Amendment. Obama sought him out for political gain in Chicago…Obama sought out and befriended Ayers…because after all those bombings took place a long time ago. This is Obama’s record and judgement.
And Wright is not just Obama’s “former Pastor” Wright is a racist who preached hate and blames America for 911…Wright has written for years in a church bulletin that Isreal deserves to be bombed….before Hamas endorsed Obama they endorsed the church and Wright’s rhetoric. This is Obama’s record and judgement.
Wake up this is not a distraction…it’s the point. It’s all about Obama’s record and judgement…what else does he have?
Obama is running a negative campaign..always has…He is not different at all apparently the dirtiest politicians in the world are sitting in Chicago…although the corruption probe is going to take a lot of them down..Maybe obama is next. Who knows he doesn’t take questions.
Posted by: Jackie | April 20, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
What is this all about, for pete’s sake?
In the ABC debate Obama said about Ayers: “The notion that me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values doesn’t make much sense.”
What more is there to say? Is DETESTABLE ACTS not strong enough? I’d think calling people’s actions DETESTABLE is VERY strong.
Then he says that the fact Ayers is among the (very many, as we can guess) people he knows does NOT say one thing about Obama’s ideas and values.
The rest, as many have said, is McCarthyism. Has America sunk to that level of political paranoia again? Are we SO weak, SO scared to death about everything that is not 100% middle of the road America?!
Obama is 100% bona fide, as McCain knows very well. JM should kick Rove overboard; such strategies will only hurt him for they remind Americans exactly of the politics they are done with. He’s make a great mistake to take this path.
Posted by: maria | April 20, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
During the Vietnam era there was so much violence, remember Kent State. Innocent college students were killed by the National Guard. You cannot single out one person for all the violence. And this was so long ago. We need to get past this.
Posted by: maryland | April 20, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
The thing about Ayers…..
” on 9-11, he was quoted in The New York Times saying, “I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough.”
I’ll Take Hillary, Thanks!
Posted by: questioner | April 20, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Why in the world would Obama chose to associate with
a former terrorist?
Posted by: Ken | April 20, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
What I don’t get this man is a prof at the university..Wy are they giving him a job if he is sooooooooooo bad for this country.By knowing him you are guilty of all he believes in?????By the way Mc Cain where was your flag pin during this interview???????Where was Georges???????Makes a difference huh guys?????Two face jerks
Posted by: h | April 20, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Caligirl,
During the Vietnam era there was so much violence, remember Kent State.
Innocent college students were killed by the National Guard. You cannot single out one person for all the violence. And this was so long ago. We need to get past this.
Why didn’t they go to prison. And shouldn’t the people who associate with them be condemed. By your way of thinking…..they should.
Posted by: maryland | April 20, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
The modern state of Israel was founded by terrorists (vs. Britain most notably). I suppose we should dump them by McCain’s “Ayers Logic”. What fools.
Posted by: McClame-Loserman 2008 | April 20, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
No coincidence, first Stephanopoulos gets this info from Fox News Hannity, then brings it up in the so-called debate. Then McCain is his first guest on thisweek… Now who is “Fair”????
Posted by: QuietStormX aka Carroll | April 20, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
We should not judge Obama with “guilt by association?” Excuse Me – Radical Left Wing Moveonorg. Liberals – if someone is thinking of running for President of the United States of America, it would seem logical and practical to extricate yourself from some of your more “radical and terrorist and anti-american” friends before announcing your candidacy. Unless, of course, you are so stupid (in the George W. Bush sense of the word) to understand that your friends are “radical and terrorist and anti-american” and they make you unelectable. Is the correct word for Obama “filled with HUBRIS”?? It will be a very, very annoying run for the presidency for Obama since the Republicans are certain to keep bringing up “guilt by association” and silly issues like flag pins! OBAMA SHOULD MOVEON OUT OF THE RACE! NO WIMPYBAMA 08! NO MOVEONORG. IN THE WHITE HOUSE! NO RADICAL LEFT WING TERRORISTS IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!!
Posted by: calli | April 20, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
I am amazed at the ignorance of some bloggers here.
PP, Obama has a duel citizenship, so what. My husband does too.
Posted by: lisa | April 20, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
mara,
FYI: I have had posts blocked also. Usually it concerns a copy and paste from a newspaper though. However, a few of my own creations have been deleted after posted. I am not sure there is consistency to state that any point of view is favored. I am a Clinton supporter; I assume you are an Obama supporter. I tried to post a short article from the today’s Boston Globe. It was blocked as “spam.” It could be that it is copyrighted.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 20, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Maryland,
I grew up in the SF Bay Area, and have no probelms separating who did what during that turbulant time. Ayers and his group always seemed like a rich, college kids, who loved cameras in their faces more than anything.
Then all the random off the wall comments that had no bearing on the peaceful anti-war movement, like ‘kill your parents’.
Of course, their bombing escapades and camera time was rather significant which lead many to believe their goals had nothing to do with anti-war beliefs.
In other words, in CA we thought they were frauds, especially since the media could find them nightly but somehow the govt couldn’t.
Now in Oakland, the Black Panthers were started because of police brutality. They read the Constitution and discovered it was legal for them to carry shotguns, as long as it wasn’t concealed. They organized as a way to protect their community. They also help to start a breakfast program for needy children.
Here is one organization which seemed to only serve itself and was destructive…sorta. While making weird demands all the time, and throwing in random off the wall statements like ‘kill all the rich people’, ‘kill your parents’, which have nothing to do with the anti-war movement.
Compared to the Black Panthers that formed in service to it’s community. Literally, to help save lives and then to help those same people’s children before they went to school.
There was something off with Ayers back then and there is still something off with Ayers now.
I remember the man…and blame him for his own actions and those he inspired in his group.
Maybe you should take a walk over to Wiki and remind yourself.
Posted by: Cali girl | April 20, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Another note on this…
“William Ayers Weather Underground past no big deal in Chicago.” Lynn Sweet, Chicago Sun-Times. April 18, 2008
“Ayers, who became a scholar at the University of Illinois-Chicago, was also eventually embraced by a pragmatic son of blue-collar Bridgeport desperately trying to upgrade Chicago’s chronically troubled schools: Mayor Daley, whose father’s legacy was tarnished because of anti-Vietnam War protesters getting clobbered in the 1968 convention and the “Days of Rage” the next year.
Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf knew Ayers in the 1960s and re-met Ayers and Dohrn decades later. In the 1960s Wolf said he and Ayers were on opposite sides of the use of violence to effect social change. Then, Ayers thought it useful. Wolf came out of the school of nonviolence.”
Posted by: kravitz | April 20, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Folks, this Ayers guy didn’t contribute one penny to Obama’s presidential campain as far as we know. In 2001 he once contributed 200 dollars to an Obama campaign in Chicago.
People who sit on boards of foundations don’t select each other. Nor do people in a neighborhood of a city select each other.
If we like it or not, Ayers is a distinguished Professor and a wellknown and active guy in Chicago nowadays. Everyone in politics, charity foundations, education program etc. knows and works with the guy. I read the statement by the Mayor of Chicago who knows Ayers a lot better than Obama does , who worked with him on several programs etc. and who wrote that it is ridiculous to blame Obama for knowing Ayers.
Other than the Mayor btw, Obama called the Weather Undergrounds acts ‘detestable’ which is a pretty strong condemnation in anyone’s book.
So what IS the problem? Is everyone in Chicago who knows and works with Ayers a supporter of the 70′s actions of that Weather Underground? Is everyone who lives in Obama’s pretty chique neighborhood and who’s on friendly terms with neighbor Ayers suspect? No doubt a lot of Repuclican voters talk to him all the time as well.
So yes if your goal is a smear campaign against Obama, using all the nonsense there is, go ahead. But don’t pretend there’s any substance here, and if you think that Obama has any respect for these Weather Underground actions you must be out of your mind for these are the total opposite of everything this man stands for and has stood for in the 20 years of his public service.
Posted by: hardy | April 20, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
There was something off with Ayers back then and there is still something off with Ayers now.
I remember the man…and blame him for his own actions and ———————————————————-
Calli, I guess you know him personally to make that statement.
Posted by: maryland | April 21, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Calli, please tell me what is off about him now. I forgot to put this in my post to you.
Posted by: maryland | April 21, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
lisa, the “so what” about dual citizenship is that your husband is not running for the president of the us, swearing allegiance to it alone. elected officials, in order to show they are impartial, step down from boards, ceo positions etc., and put their assets in blind trusts so there is no impropriety. i would think citizenship “might” be included there.
Posted by: pp | April 21, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
CNN: After All the Major PA Newspapers Shun Her, Clinton Boasts of Support by Richard Mellon Scaife’s Conservative Pittsburgh Paper. Pathetic. “The New York senator famously built a relationship with former critic Rupert Murdoch, whose New York Post frequently blasted both Clintons. The Australian-born media baron even hosted a fundraiser for her during her second Senate run. But over the past few months, her presidential campaign has taken its apparent embrace of former media adversaries to a new level, sending reporters articles that praise Clinton and attack Barack Obama drawn from conservative outlets including the National Review and the American Spectator, and quotes from Republican pundits like Ed Rollins and Grover Norquist. And former President Bill Clinton made an appearance on talker Rush Limbaugh’s show the day of the Texas and Ohio primaries – contests in which the conservative radio host had urged listeners to vote for Hillary Clinton as a means of sabotaging the Democratic nominating process. 4/21 About says it all doesn’t it ?
Posted by: Jim | April 21, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Pssst….Hardy did you happen to know that Ayers’ father was a CEO Commonwealth Edison, which is owned by Exelon the largest utility in Illinois.
Which does support Obama….
Soooo is Ayers still connected with Commonwealth Edison? Even with stock that would benefit from Obama and his support of nuclear power?
I don’t know…but that is still a connection larger than $200, not to mention that coming out party in his living room back in the 90s.
And that is a connection that maybe the voters in Nevada might want to know about since Obama has such strong ties to a company that has been itching to export/force it’s nuclear waste probelm on another state.
Posted by: Cali girl | April 21, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
pp, duel citizen doesn’t matter. Who cares.
Posted by: lisa | April 21, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
LMAO calli, another republican plant
Posted by: moe | April 21, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
This is an intriguing recap of an article stating that Rupert Murdock has the goods on Obama but is saving them to break after he beats Hillary Clinton. He wants Bloomberg in.
It covers Rezko and Auchi but boy of boy this looks plausible.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 21, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
lisa, it matters to many. and we do care.
Posted by: pp | April 21, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Every time Senator Obama or one of his spoke persons tries to link Senator McCain’s policies to President Bushs’, McCain should link Obama’s policies with the failed presidency of Jimmy Carter–because that’s what you’re going to get.
Posted by: RJG | April 21, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Madison, Wisconsin is known to be pretty leftwing. Berkeley, California is known to be pretty leftwing.
Chicago, Illinois has never been accused of being leftwing. Mayor Daley has never been accused of being leftwing. The Chicago Tribune has never been accused of being leftwing.
So when you hear all these ooh! ooh! comments coming out about someone that Chicagoans (who presumably would know him best) have fully accepted into their community, give that some thought.
The Chicago Tribune’s editorial the day after the debate supported Ayers’s work in Chicago. Mayor Daley made a statement supporting Ayers’s work in Chicago.
If it sounds too bad to be true…it probably isn’t true. McCain oppo research team is either ignorant or trying to mislead voters. (Likely both.)
Posted by: Tom J | April 21, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
btw – did anyone notice on “This Week” that McCain thinks people pay capital gains taxes on their 401K plans?
People Unclear on the Concept.
Posted by: Tom J | April 21, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
It seems that the anti-war protest in which Obama spoke and opposed the war was attended by Ayers and Dohrn. Read below; this article is from that time and has many quotes that are reminiscent of Obama today and his call for post-partisan view. Ayers and Dohrn hate the Democrats and they say so, explicitely.
Debunking the 60s with Ayers and Dohrn
Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers, activiists leaders in SDS in the ‘60’s, say a new movement must be built.
By Laura S. Washington
‘One of the things that sits very heavy on the progressive impulses today is the myth that there was a golden age in resistance.’Tags activism Share Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine They are storied and iconic, America’s Numero Uno radical couple. In the ’60s, Bernardine Dohrn and Bill Ayers were activists and leaders in Students for a Democratic Society and the Weathermen. Dohrn, now 64, and Ayers, 61, played starring roles as Vietnam War dissenters. When their protests turned violent, they became fugitives from the law.
Forty years later, they are still in the game. I recently invited them to dinner at Yoshi’s Café in Chicago’s Boys Town. The national convention of Students for a Democratic Society was coming to Chi-Town. So what do these longtime Hyde Parkers think about those good old days, when radicals were radicals and the movement was muscular?
“The ‘good old days’ is a funny way to think about the left,” said Dohrn.
Ayers picked it up. “One of the things that sits very heavy on the progressive impulses today, and young people in particular, is the myth that there was a golden age in resistance, that the ’60s was where it was really at.”
Today Dohrn is a scholar and director of the Children and Family Justice Center at Northwestern University. Ayers serves as a distinguished professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. They visit college campuses around the nation, where, Ayers says, “We spend a fair amount of time debunking the received wisdom of the ’60s.”
That “wisdom,” he explains, is that resisting the war “was easy to do and everybody did it.” It was a hard-fought slog.
Iraq brings its own lessons of protest. He points to a failure of leadership in the run-up to that war. “In March 2003, we participated in the largest antiwar movement in our lives, possibly in history. Now there was a leadership problem in a sense that the leadership said this is the demonstration that will prevent a war.
“It was a wrong thing to say,” Ayers argues, “because it didn’t help people who participated in that, particularly young people, to analyze the situation, to make sense of it, to make a contribution, and then to continue organizing. It said we’ll prevent a war. That war was not preventable.”
Forget the Democrats, they say. “The Democratic Party supported the war in Vietnam …” Dohrn began. Ayers cut in: “Led the war in Vietnam.”
“And they’ve been supporting, and leading this war,” Dohrn continued. “I don’t look to the Democratic Party. I don’t have hope for the Democratic Party. I think the Democratic Party is bankrupt. And I think the only answer is for us to build an independent, radical movement, and, I mean, the big ‘us.’ “
To mount a movement, “let’s look at history,” said Dohrn between bites of her tuna nicoise salad. “Lyndon Johnson was not a civil rights leader; Lyndon Johnson was responding to a civil rights movement. FDR was not a labor leader; FDR was responding to a labor movement. We confuse these things when we think about them today.”
Indeed, that’s “a great mistake. Lyndon Johnson was the most effective politician of his generation, but it took a movement independent of Lyndon Johnson to get Lyndon Johnson to use that effectiveness for the good.”
Still, I asked, aren’t progressives putting high hopes in November? Even leading Republicans admit that the Dems are likely to recapture at least one house of Congress.
So what? That’s not the point, Ayers says. Electoral politics is a tool to connect causes, like gay rights, disability rights, voting rights, human rights. “That’s how you use electoral politics. Not as an end in itself, but as an organizing mechanism. Our deepest belief, I think, is that we need to connect all these good projects and build the movement. …we should always be positioning ourselves, thinking, okay, if I’m involved in this next election, how am I positioned to help contribute to building a movement, raising consciousness, making the connections, and that’s a real tricky business.”
It wasn’t so tricky for Ned Lamont. On Aug. 8 Lamont blew out of nowhere to knock off the pro-war U.S. Sen. Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic senate primary. For my money, that vote is a strong predictor of the power war-weary voters will bring to the polls this fall.
Despite their critiques, Ayers and Dohrn are eternal optimists. Over coffee, Dohrn reflected that their activist days can serve as a metaphor for a “candle” that illuminates the past—and the future.
“The issue holding us back today, to me, is the idea that what you do won’t make a difference. The elite powers tell us the world is too complicated. They spend a lot of energy fostering despair,” she argues.
The candle shows us that “it’s not true,” Dohrn says. “I don’t think it’s all the complicated issues of what kind of an economic society we really want and how are we going to deal with globalization and all of that. Those are tremendously complex challenges but they’re solvable by human creativity and ingenuity and collective effort.”
Stay vigilant. The light will come.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 21, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
That is the major problem with McCain. He changes his position on issues almost weekly. It is a form of lying. McCain will say one thing to this group of voters and the exact opposite to another set of voters. McCain lies. He even lied about public campaign finance money. McCain is another Bush in so many ways. McCain just wants to be president at all costs. McCain lies when necessary.
Posted by: McCain Problem | April 21, 2008, 5:27 am 5:27 am
How corrupt is the system when John McCain can operate outside of the campaign finance laws and no one questions this action?
Posted by: campaign finance laws | April 21, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am
I got this from a fellow blogger and thought this might be interesting for us here -
==================
Maybe someone should ask Cheney his thoughts on Bill Ayers:
On ABC’s “This Week,” Cheney defended his 1986 vote against a resolution that called for U.S. recognition of the African National Congress in South Africa, freedom for the organization’s then-imprisoned leader Nelson Mandela and negotiations with the black majority.
“The ANC was then viewed as a terrorist organization,” Cheney said Sunday. “It was a step that we simply weren’t prepared to take.”
Now, Cheney says he believes the ANC has “mellowed” and Mandela is “a great man.”
“He deserves an enormous amount of credit for the transformation of South Africa,”
Cheney said “But I don’t have any problems at all with the vote I cast 20 years ago.”
Posted by: kanobi11 | April 21, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am
to all those harping on this
how about the media doing a single story, just one, on just one of the clinton scandals during this entire primary…not one.
and do you think America knows the details of anything outside of Monica…and the lying on the stand thing…
uh, no, absolutely not…that is what is so funny about this election
your so called “biased media” jumps all over any relationship Obama has had in the past. Predominantly ignoring all of the ones the other candidates have had for the most part. …but yet
can you tell me the details of the cattle futures? what was the outcome? what was the controversy over Vince Foster? what was whitewater exactly and why was Hillary implicated? what was the wehole fbi thing? who was Norman Hsu? Who is Paul? what was there relationship with clinton? What does the head of Tyson have to do withy the Clintons? are their accusations of Hillary’s performance during watergate? and what were they? how many people that were supposed to be involved in some way in a scandal with the clintons and the ensuing investigations have died suddenly? how much money did Hillary’s brother have to return when an investigation turned up he had received it for the pardoning of two men?
again this all just off the top of my head… but I bet almost all of you couldn’t answer a single one of these questions past …”the republicans investigated these and spent tons of money on it and came up with nothing”
uh, no. The republicans investigated until they discovered Bill lying on the stand, focused on that issue and spent a fortune trying to get around the cover-up that Bill was trying to put in the way…and in the end after spending all that money they succeeded in ahving him impeached while the Clintons threw sand in the American people’s eyes saying it was a great right wing conspiracy…He lied to the American people and on the stand.
It is not just about “sex.”
…stop with the biased in the media crap. if the media actually started focusing on what you all want and are trying to win on, hillary would have never won her senate seat.
Posted by: dl | April 21, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
McCain who ?
Posted by: Hillarious | April 21, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Good old George…. he’s still in there. Wow !!!! Must be on the Clinton payroll. Hillary and Bill have been saying for a while that they have an ace in the hole that they were going to use against Obama. His name is George Stephanopolous.All this fuss about Clinton supporters voting for McCain if she doesn’t get the nomination is a testament that her followers are not real Democrats.
Posted by: Hillarious | April 21, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
People talk about McCain as though he is like Bush when really Obama is more like Bush. Neither has experience so they just blindly make stupid mistakes. The American people will see Obama for the arrogant, slime-ball that he is, hopefully before the general election.
Posted by: Paul | April 21, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
McCain’s the perfect candidate to lead the march to facism that Bush/Cheney have begun. Goodbye democracy. Welcoem to the United States of Militarism.
Posted by: 11thCavVet | April 21, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Obama supporters are still making excuses for Ayers… who is unrepentant and even said as late as 2001 he wished he could have done more (bombings).
We all have associations with undesirables… but really… do we all make excuses for their illegal and dangerous behavior? NO.
Additionally… the real problem with Obama’s connection to Ayers is that Obama has tried to downplay it, yet more information keeps dribbling out. He did the same with Rezko… and Wright. It looks like he is trying to hide something… and anyone knows that in politics it will all come out eventually… so smart politicians reveal the entire story so that they have control over it.
So is Obama trying to hide something… or isn’t he that smart?
P.S. I agree with McCain… Obama should never have compared Senator Coburn to Ayers… Obama first called Coburn a friend and then threw him under the bus. It is starting to get really crowded under that bus with Grandma and Jesse Jackson.
Posted by: Nickberry | April 21, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
I’m thrilled that McSame and his merry little band of followers are hanging their hats on stuff like this. This stuff might fool the less intelligent right-wing voters, but that’s not going to be enough this time.
Posted by: Chris | April 21, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I’m so glad ABC had the courage to bring Ayers/Obama connection up in the debate. I hope McCain keeps it going.
Just another seed of doubt about Obama.
How people can just ignore Obama’s shady associations with anti-Americans is unbelievable.
I question their patriotism and love of this country.
Posted by: cindy | April 21, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Comment and a Question.
Comment: Senator Obama was not 8 years old when he sought William Ayers’ endorsement for public office.
Question: When he met with Ayers to get his support, what constituency was he going after?
Posted by: nddtrader | April 21, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Could Cyndi McCain’s USMC pin (The View) be any bigger? And the audience could read her as fake.
Posted by: kravitz | April 21, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I saw this interview…I know it’s campaign season, but does that mean that every time someone mentions something negative or has an opinion about another candidate that makes it an “attack”.
Anyone who thinks that hanging out with a terrorist as long as his crimes wer a long time ago must live in Chicago. Obama befriended Ayers for political expediancy. He is really an opportunist with poor judgement. The movement is something else…the man has Achilles heels on both feet.
Posted by: Jackie | April 22, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am
Obama couldn’t close the deal in Pennsylvania. Is he electable?
Posted by: Karen | April 24, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
What is it about McCain/Bush that makes folks go to any level to continue the horror? This war, our economy, the ecology, etc., is at its worst and a person like Obama may make a positive difference in our lives. Give up the hate…please!!
Posted by: dbwoff007 | April 25, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
First, Obama is running on the sole contention that John McCain is GWB…very weak. The fact that the GWB has such a low approval rating and Obama is not crucifying the G.O.P. shows what a poor opinion the general public has of this man. At best, he is seem by some as the lesser of two evils. His best move would be to eat some humble pie and quit acting like he has a mandate from on high.
Posted by: bfidler | October 5, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Too many nuts in Obama’s ACORN tree. Keep shaking and let’s see how many more fall out.
Posted by: Casey | October 9, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
so pathetic. how much $$ did mccain get for his tiny little soul? doesn’t he realize he’s destroying himself?
jgaw, is there anything that matters to you besides taxes? obama will not raise the capital gains rate to 28%. tax rates are going up no matter who wins, because they must. one good thing about this crisis is that it will finally no longer be possible for the GOP to keep saying that Ronald Reagan is their hero. the roots of our current crisis are in the erroneous belief that we can always grow our way out of deficits. wake up! the markets are not infinite!
Posted by: Joe P | October 10, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm