Stormy Weather
An argument pushed by the campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, is that Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, has not been fully vetted.
As Clinton-backing Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell told us last week "she’s been really well vetted, all the bad stuff is by and large out there, and there are no surprises. With Sen. Obama I think the right now he may run, a little stronger in some areas — not the key states — but in some areas against Sen McCain, but understand that he hasn’t been vetted." Rendell said there was 10% about Clinton that "we don’t know yet" and "about 50% about Barack Obama that we don’t know yet."
Which brings us to William Ayres.
Ayres is Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and founder of both the Small Schools Workshop and the Center for Youth and Society.
He also spent the 1970s as a fugitive from justice, as a member of the Weather Underground, after the domestic terrorist group, preparing to attack an Army base, accidentally exploded a Greenwich Village townhouse killing three of their own members. Ayres later married feather Weather Underground member Bernardine Dohrn, then on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted List.
”I don’t regret setting bombs,” Ayres told the New York Times in 2001 upon publication of his memoir about that era, "Fugitive Days." ”I feel we didn’t do enough.”
As celebrated members of the Chicago liberal world, Ayres and Obama have some connections.
They served on a board together when Obama was a state senator. Ayres donated $200 to Obama’s campaign in 2001. They sat on a panel together in 2002 called "Intellectuals in Times of Crisis." Obama went to Ayres and Dohrn’s home in 1995 to be introduced to some of the more influential liberals in the area by the state senator he was preparing to succeed, Alice Palmer.
(Palmer, who changed her mind about not running for reelection for her state senate seat after being defeated in a US House race, was later unable to get on the ballot because Obama challenged her petitions to do so, in some hardball Chicago-style politics, a whole other interesting story.)
"Bill Ayers lives in his neighborhood. Their kids attend the same school," Obama senior strategist David Axelrod told the Politico. "They’re certainly friendly, they know each other, as anyone whose kids go to school together." (Ayres’ kids are actually much older than Obama’s but Dohrn is still active at the school.)
"We can relitiigate again and again these 40-year-old battles," Axelrod said. "He thinks what was done then was wrong and outrageous, and he believes that you can’t defend the indefensible – but he’s looking forward, he’s not looking back."
"Senator Obama strongly condemns the violent actions of the Weathermen group, as he does all acts of violence," Obama spokesman Bill Burton told the New York Sun when asked about the connection. "But he was an eight-year-old child when Ayers and the Weathermen were active, and any attempt to connect Obama with events of almost 40 years ago is ridiculous."
Is that enough for you? Perhaps it is. Perhaps you think this is all a silly political smear.
But should Obama get the nomination, what will moderate and swing voters in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Missouri think of it all? Will they think Obama is able to transcend partisan divisions if he’s been supported by Ayres?
The proverbial Republican attack machine is chugging along on this — see THIS CLIP from last night’s "Hannity & Colmes" on Fox News, featuring Karl Rove making much hay out of this connection, however tenuous, and Ayres speaking at the University of North Dakota saying he doesn’t regret anything he did against the government.
There is a tendency in the Obama campaign to not take these types of stories seriously. That is a "perfect world" approach to politics. In a perfect world, some might argue, we would be debating policy in Iraq, the economy and health care. We wouldn’t have discussions about whether Al Gore claimed he invented the internet, or George W. Bush got a DUI in the 1970s, we wouldn’t talk about Swift Boat Vet for truth claims that contradict official Naval records.
But that’s not the world we live in. Yes, the mainstream media is complicit in that, but there are other forces at play. Paid TV ads, the internet, cable news, talk radio — sources of information, and misinformation that have an impact on the electorate, necessitating that the mainstream media cover stories having an influence on the election even if they did not originate in the mainstream media. We of course are obligated to fact check them and deal with them responsibly and the mainstream media does not always rise to the challenge.
But campaigns have to know how to deal with such stories as well.
Former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, has not endorsed Obama precisely because he worries Obama is not tough enough to deal with attacks such as these, such as the fact that this Ayres story is still out there, with very little pushback from Obama — or even, frankly, any acknowledgment as to why some voters might not like the idea of Obama being friendly with a man such as Ayres.
This Stevenson-esque (Adlai, not McLean) regard for fighting these stories is likely a reason we haven’t seen a stampede of superdelegates over to Obama to end this never-ending primary season.
What do you think?
- jpt
Email
White House Blinks Amid Catholic Church Anger?
Navy SEAL Commander Advised: Get the Hell Out of the Media
Thank you Jake! This story is LONG overdue in the MSM.
Posted by: LOM | April 10, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
“Guilt by association” when it is convenient for the Obama campaign and “she is a LIAR!” with all other stories.
Posted by: LOM | April 10, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Idle people at work !!Just tired of useless allegations,i think there are more pressing matters to be discussed,am outta here.
Posted by: ed | April 10, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
I’m not so sure this will hurt Obama because the association is not as close as the Rev. Wright controversy
Clinton has not been throughly vetted
The media has yet to remind voters of the Clinton scandals in the 90s
Posted by: Vanessa | April 10, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
I think you’re really reaching here. All the media keeps digging and digging on Obama and this is the best you can do? Ouch-it must hurt. Barack Obama will be our next president!
Posted by: Tiffany | April 10, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
I think that there is a recognition by the Obama campaign that you don’t put out the bad on yourself.
He knows where the pot holes are and where the bones they’re going to hit him over the head with are buried.
I look at the Wright story and note how he immediatly made the rounds that Friday and he delivered a huge speech that roadblocked the networks and basically took the sting out of the story for the time being. It’s still laying in wait; but it’s a fact that he’s done a lot to defuse the situation.
Similarly, if the Ayers’ story has video (which Rove made a point of) then he will likely have to do the same thing. But to make this a huge issue NOW is irresponsible to his campaign and stops him from driving HIS winning message.
Similarly, he has reacted the the Muslim smears and stealth email attacks through technology and his stump speeches. Never blowing them up to a point where they overwhelm the campaign’s message; but still driving his own message out there. And he has been successful in that too.
I would argue that Obama has had to deal with his issues in this primary in a way Clinton has not. Which means if she does get the nomination thorught the superdelegates; the hurt feelings of that coupled with the stacks of oppo I know the RNC has on her and he way she will motivate the base; she has issues that are not being properly represented in a primary fight at all. And won’t be; because it’d be sucidal for Obama to go there.
Overall, Obama has handled his mindfields clearly and with speed. Not as many would say typical. The Politico had a great story on how he handled the Muslim smear and how he IS Christian and drived that message through increased reachout to people of faith. He’s doing the same thing with the smears spread about him through the Jewish community.
HRC, however, has not been so nimble IMO on the huge stories she has had. The driver’s liscenes fiasco took two weeks to resolve. The Tuzla story didn’t get resolved at all. The hits she’s taken have really hit her and she has not bounced back as Obama has from his.
So that’s why I personally don’t buy the vetting argument.
Or the idea that the Obama team doesn’t know how to manage a crisis or campaign.
Sorry this got so long.
Posted by: Rhoda | April 10, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
To me this is interesting the fact that he met with this terrorist in preparing to run for Senate.
This is not guilt by association, this is about people that are close to him and you tell a lot of people by who they hang with.
I find it funny that they only denounce after they been caught in the association.
Oh by the way libs you use the guilt by asociation against Republicans even when who they are associated with are hardworking companies or Americans, But when a lib is associated with a Racist Preacher and a Terrorist Who we are at war with thats not right
Hypocrits!!!!!
Posted by: spock | April 10, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
My son wanted to know what it took to be President and I told him oh..not really alot of brains ( think Bush) but you will have to ask for a background check on anyone you will ever meet,speak to , look at, or that your kids play with.I also told him he would have to check into the backgrounds of all of his family members to make sure that they had never made an insensitve remark or signed a petition that he himself may not agree with. All of this to ensure that he is fully vetted ( well not him necessarily but anyone that he has come into contact with over the course of his life)- because it is not really what he says or thinks that really matters nowadays.. Yep those are the requirements to be President.. make sure your friends, family, co-workers and perhaps even your childhood sweethearts are all politically correct, never mind the actual issues !!!
That’s what I think Jake
Since you asked
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
When challenged on his lack of experience in national security and defense issues Obama points to his allegedly superior judgment.I don,t buy it. In fact, he has demonstrated very poor judgment and one anti-war speech several years ago does not make up for that.
Obama’s association with Ayers, who after 9/11 said he did not regret setting bombs against the US government in the 70s, again calls Obama’s judgment into question. How can someone who aspires to lead this country associate with people like Ayers and Wright, who have demonstrated and voiced such contempt for this country? Ditto to Obama’s friend Rezko who defrauded our political system for political gain.
Posted by: hermanism | April 10, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I don’t normally like your views. But you did Obama some justice. This guy ayers is well respected now. Obama was 8 years old when this guy did that. He was one of them Vietnam fighter types doesn’t excuse it but still we can’t blame obama
Posted by: Antoine | April 10, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
I have never seen a candidate never vetted by the MSM as Obama has never been vetted.
People are saying the preacher thing passed because of Obama’s speech, well that speech said nothing, and did not change anything.
Obama who talks a lot says aweful lot of Nothing.
But thanks Libs, you gave the weaker candidate as you nominee!!
Posted by: spock | April 10, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Thanks, Jake. Well done.
Ayres is a terrorsit. Ayres is a friend and adviser of Obama. Ayres has raised money for Obama. They talk with each other and have met with each other many times.
That is not guilt by association. That IS fact.
Wake up America. Obama often meets with terrorists like Ayres. Look at the people around Obama. Look at what Obama has said. He wants to strip us of our 2nd Amendment rights, and create a North American Union (Mexico, Canada, and the US).
What part of unconstitutional does Obama and his camapign not understand?
Obama is the anti-American, anti-2nd Amendment candidate for POTUS. The MSM should dig deeper into Obama’s connections to the two “A’s” : Ayres and Auchi.
Keep up the good work, Jake.
Posted by: Livin' in Chicago | April 10, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
He may have been 8 years old, but in his adult life, he has chosen to be associated with a guy who does not regret the bombings and still feels that he did not do enough. Unrepented still to this day and that’s okay?
Posted by: LOM | April 10, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I think this is just grasping at straws. People want so badly to find something “wrong” with Obama that they reach. Obama ’08!
Posted by: Marie | April 10, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
With the Roland Martin piece and the push back from the gay organizations, it will get harder for Obama to pretend he is above all the ‘divisions’ and still retain support.
Had the evangelicals actually taken the time to understand the agendas of the neocons, would Bush have prospered? The problem of aggregating the disaffected is when they discover you are hoodwinking them for your own success, they turn on you more harshly than they did their opponents. The experience Bush is having with MSM and the experience JFK had after the honeymoon are relevant.
So if you elect Obama, expect a very harsh midterm because unlike Bush, he will be watched by every disaffected person in the world plus a press hungry for a figure to savage.
This campaign is playing with lit matches in a barn full of dry hay. It’s bad to be on top of the stack when the hay catches fire.
Posted by: len | April 10, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
He is not a friend of Obama, nor is he a advisor nor has he raised money for Obama
How about Ala Senakreh endorsing Hillary
Guilt by Association
Posted by: Vanessa | April 10, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
to all obamaites,this is another piece of the puzzle that some of us on hillarys side have been talking about for months.when you take the time and open your mind it is plain to see that there is a consistant pattern of obama associating with ultra left marxist people starting with his uncle frank[communist party member]his own statements about searching out marxist professors in collage,his 20 year reltionship with wright[the statement about using the bomb on the japanese is standard far left speak]and his assocition with ayers and dohrn.taken separately they might not seem like much,taken together they present a disturbing picture of obama associating with people with clear antimerican ideals,THIS IS WHY A LOT OF CENTRIST DEMOCRATS LIKE MYSELF WILL NOT VOTE FOR HIM PERIOD.
Posted by: don tufts | April 10, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
There’s something here I really don’t get.
Some folks here write: “Ayres is a terrorist.”
However, Ayres is Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and founder of both the Small Schools Workshop and the Center for Youth and Society.
So what’s up?
Is he… a “terrorist”…
or Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and founder of both the Small Schools Workshop and the Center for Youth and Society?
Both can’t be true, in the USA, or can it?
What’s the problem with having a Ayres is Distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and founder of both the Small Schools Workshop and the Center for Youth and Society amog your supporters, if you happen to be a politician from Chicago?
Or are you folks simply gone nuts?
Posted by: trent | April 10, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I think that Alice Palmer story is awful, and so revealing about his character. People should know about it.
Posted by: Vnd | April 10, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
In the News today McCain says he will model REAGAN’S ECONOMY.LOL WE ARE GOING TO HELL ALL. People won’t for Obama because of Associations and Hillary won’t win because if she does win nom black and youth going home not because hate but her bad campaign. McCain the man to put us in the depression
Posted by: Antoine | April 10, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
I don’t think it makes sense for the Obama campaign to introduce this type of oppo research against itself to the mainstream dialogue, which is all that would happen if they started pushing back against a story that has gotten so little play. When the story actually hits in a meaningful way, they’ll push back against it, and if the pushback they orchestrated against the muslim smear and the similar guilt-by-association charges with Rev. Wright, they’ll be quite effective.
The way the Obama camp has handled these two issues should really put to rest all this Adlai talk, which seems like a narrative 4 months too old, now.
Posted by: Dave | April 10, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
WashingtonPost did a Fact check on this a long time ago. Its getting more push 2 weeks before PA so Hillary can stay in the race and win.
Posted by: antoine | April 10, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Enough is enough, I will never vote for Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama ticket. Although, I don’t like John McCain too much but I have no other choice but vote for him. At least he has a clean background. I think many moderate Dem and independents will act the same. Dem, please pick your candidate carefully although a little late.
Posted by: stock_craft | April 10, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
stock_craft
McCain has a clean background?
Look up The Keating Five scandal.
Posted by: AkaDad | April 10, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
“…and no one is buying the crafty little ‘I only bring it up because the GOP will in November’ excuse anymore either.”
Really? The Republican 527s are not nice and to dismiss them in a GE is a joke. Ask Kerry how that went for him in 2004.
Posted by: LOM | April 10, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
AkaDa, personally scandal if he has doesn’t matter too much because we don’t have any other better candidate. Blame ourselves and Americans for picking wrong candidate in the primary.
Posted by: stock_craft | April 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Obama has shady associates. What a surprise!
Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 10, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Since when is the Politico considered MSM?
Posted by: LOM | April 10, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
she is so vetted …so thats why we are hearing about 800,000 dollars and colombia ties….that rendell needs to go and get some brain.
Posted by: mechlife | April 10, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
The Republicans can barely contain their glee at the thought of running against Obama. This may not be a big deal to progressives, but it will be a big deal for some and made an even bigger deal by the Republican wrecking machine. It just adds to his un-patriotic persona.
Posted by: Mack | April 10, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
While there are undoubtedly a number of interesting tales yet to be told about Senator Obama, it does indeed remain to be seen if he can appreciate how any of them play to mainstream America. His speech on racial matters illustrates the point. The senator tends to wax philosophic and paint a topic with a wide brush (to mix metaphors slightly). Rarely does he approach these issues with direct, simple statements, the kind of straight-to-the-point comments that are easy to communicate and grasp.
Unless he learns simple clarity the Democratic party may leave the majority of the voters scratching their heads and changing the channel back to what they find comfortable.
Posted by: Mike Green | April 10, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
What did bill really do for the extra 15 million that showed up on their tax return,who really contributed to the clinton library,where are their 2007 tax returns.what’s really behind the mysterious deaths of the clinton’s associates during bill’s administration. why is bill clinton so engulfed with foreign governments. Inquiring minds want to know!
Obama 08!
Posted by: merle7 | April 10, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
People who care about this story, bearing no relevance whatsoever for what Obama ’08 is about, while they do NOT care about the prospect of Hillary sharing the Presidential bedroom with the world’s most influential lobbyist for FOREIGN interests, or about the prospect of America’s prolonged war in Iraq and the severest depression as a result, must be truly and totally out of their mind. THEY are the puppets of the MSM and blogs like this.
It’s a very sad sight and it convinces me even more that ‘we cannot wait’ with changing this country for the better; America can’t afford do NOT chose it’s greatest living political son to become President of this deeply confused country.
BARACK OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT!
Posted by: paula B | April 10, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
This story wont get too big un less BO is the nominee in that case it will blow wide open
When talking about the people Bo surrounds himself with-look no further than his wife MO
That woman is full of hate and resentment toward our country and whites
Posted by: Betty | April 10, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
PAULA B ,are we confused because we dont want a president that has associated and in his own words sought out marxist professors and a long list of other antiamerican people or is it that your view of america coinsides with those marxist viewpoints.
Posted by: don tufts | April 10, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
The mention of Adlai Stevenson brings to mind a pattern among Democrats, which is playing itself out in this election cycle: trashing the electable candidate in favor of the perfect candidate. Most readers of this blog will say, “Stevenson who?”, but Adlai was the darling of the Democratic party fifty years ago. He was the thinking Democrat’s candidate. He was intellectual, above the fray, correct on all of the issues, and a thorough going loser of a candidate. The Democrats loved to nominate Adlai, only to see him trounced in the general election.
When the liberal wing of the Democratic party is ascendent it loves to nominate a Stevenson-like Democrat. The Lib-Wing demands purety above all else, and a disdain for the gritty reality of winning the White House. Gore, with his massive environmental credentials, was the purest’s candidate, as was Kerry, with his history of war protest.
Gore, Kerry, and Stevenson all had one thing in common, they could not win a race for dog catcher if the opponent put up any kind of fight.
I hope history does not repeat itself with Obama, but I fear that it will.
Hillary may not be pure, and she may not be correct on all of the issues, but she can fight. She may win ugly, just like the Big Dog, but she will still win. She is our best shot at the White House.
Posted by: David H | April 10, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
S. O. Wilson once observed that “some people would rather believe than know”. That seems very appropriate when it comes to Obama and Clinton fanatics.
Posted by: Surelock Homes | April 10, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Mack,
“the Republican wrecking machine” is a wreck itself.
And so is the Republican Bush-Cheney administration, so is the Republican economy in our country, so is the Republican war in Iraq, so is the 71 years old Republican nominee, and so is the overall Republican appetite for the GE.
Everything GOP is a wreck this year. The DNC has nothing to fear, our next President will be a Democrat.
Posted by: ken | April 10, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
There’s a reason why Obama can’t/won’t engage on these kinds of stories, which keep piling up in the corner that he prefers you not pay any attention to.
He can’t repudiate because they are he, and he are they. Think of Rev. Wright’s premonition that Obama will need to create the impression of distance between himself and the good reverend, and when that time comes, he’ll be ok with that.
Good luck and Godspeed, my beloved but hijacked party.
Posted by: commonsensenj | April 10, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
What so their kids have played together and they know each other?
Why is that such a big deal?
Posted by: maritza | April 10, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Well, the issue here is “Who is Obama?”.
Obama is a self-styled transcendental figure.
Transcendental means “surpassing all others; superior” or “beyond common thought or experience; mystical or supernatural”.
Now, let us judge his words and actions. Actions speak louder than words.
It seems to me that Obama has bad judgment. His 2002 anti-war speech is based on his hatred for the country.
Look at his associates: Rev. Wright, Bill Ayres etc.,
We should judge people by the company they keep.
I think he is wrong for this nation. He will be a bad role model for children.
Posted by: Roger MIller | April 10, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
I think I have seen the mass mediums and politicians, for the past year, try to discredit an excellent politican.
Politics is conflict resolution, and among the remaining candidates, Obama stands the greatest chance at resolving the pressing conflicts this country faces. But, journalism today is about suggestions and inuendos and scandel, not about conflict resolution. Let’s imagine a world where questions are not posed in an article, where assertions by people like Karl Rove are checked before an article is even conceived, before a connection or suggestion is ever offered. I would venture to guess that approximately 90% of stories resulting from Rove’s (and most other politician’s suggestions) would not make it into the mass mediums. This would go a long way towards conflict resolution. Perhaps then, we could focus on the important issues such as the economy, a failed war, and the lack of education in the U.S.
Posted by: Jane | April 10, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
maritza
It’s a big deal because it typical of Obama associates.
Posted by: Aston | April 10, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Ok… so Obama is a forgiving man….I guess he will carry this outlook when he becomes President ( as some who has written here thinks he WOULD become President )
AYERS=BOMBER!!
AS PER THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN B.BURTON SAIDS “But he was an eight-year-old child when Ayers and the Weathermen were active, and any attempt to connect Obama with events of almost 40 years ago is ridiculous.”
So the men who BOMBED NYC Twin towers will be given a second chance, the BOMBERS who has been killing our forces in Iraq are given a second chance, also the BOMBERS who bombed the Pentagon as well—?????? ( AYRES/Pentagon worth googling)
Ayers is Obama’s YUPPY (now)neighbors….when they get together for fancy cheese and crackers…. do they just talk like AYERS past didn’t exist?
DOES 911 mean anything to these folks???
Posted by: carpenter.nyc | April 10, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Question of the day: Have you never met a person who you thought was a nice person, but come to find out that they have this dark side to them, and you find yourself in shock because you never saw it coming….
Obama is our best choice for change!!!!
Posted by: Becky | April 10, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
How on earth does Rendell come up with such an amazingly ridiculous formula? As Rumsfeld once famously said, “you don’t know what you don’t know,” and to suggest that all but 10% of Hillary’s demons have been exposed but 50% of Barack’s have is downright crazy.
Why does the media treat this guy (Rendell) like he actually knows what he’s talking about?
Posted by: Howard B. | April 10, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Becky
Sorry but this is just another of Obama’s shady associates. More come out of the woodwork every day. You’re backing a person who simply cannot be trusted. You can look it up!
Posted by: Aston | April 10, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Obama came out today in favor of boycotting the Olympic opening ceremonies. I wonder what took so long for the puppet-Meister’s to pull his strings.
Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Btw who cares how Sean Hannity jumps on this? Didn’t we learn enough about Hannity’s extreme right-wing if not neo-fascist connections during the last weeks? Ans we’re NOT talking 40 years ago here. Come on, it’s shameful enough that Hannity is famous name and figure in American TV journalism. I’d better stay off his track.
Posted by: ken | April 10, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Its going to cause problems.
I mean they are going to lob the word “terrorist” with Obama consistently and then issues-schmissues.
Posted by: Joan | April 10, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Honestly, I have to congratulate ABC News and Jake for informing some of us these things we were not aware of.
I wish the rest of the main stream media will remember their journalistic responsibilities and hold Obama accountable for his past.
No wonder they are in such a hurry to end this contest.
Posted by: Roger MIller | April 10, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
“Both can’t be true, in the USA, or can it?”
Sure can. There was a fellow in my hometown who was a well known drug kingpin. He also ran a car dealership, was a real-estate mogul, and contributed to all the big polticos. I asked a police investigator how this could go on with every person in town knowing about it. He replied, “Because he is a professional and knows how the game is played. The burden of proof is considerable and getting him requires a lot of resources. So unless he screws up, he gets away with it.” And he has to this very day.
What a smart person sees in Obama is a slick player. His organization understands the campaign game and they play it professionally. This doesn’t mean he has an ounce of integrity or the skills and gravitas to lead. It means he can win the Democratic nomination by never answering hard questions, leaning on feel good rhetoric, and buying lots and lots of press. It is exactly like the music business: you want a hit, don’t bribe the station manager; buy ads.
But the nomination is a sandlot game compared to the General Election where the Internet donations don’t mean much. It is easy to buy a sandlot game or any playoff, but the Super Bowl can’t be bought.
Posted by: len | April 10, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Jake wrote: “Former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, has not endorsed Obama precisely because he worries Obama is not tough enough to deal with attacks such as these”
While there have been stories written about why Edwards hasn’t endorsed either candidate.. this have never been one of the reasons. Where did this come from? He hasn’t stated this publicly. How do you know this to be fact? If it is, maybe a source would be appropriate.
Posted by: Buck | April 10, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
It seems to have worked for them during the last election, when Bush was running against an actual war hero. Imagine what they’ll do to someone like Obama, that is already being potrayed as being un-patriotic, and who has done nothing of note in his past to deflect any of the critism.
Posted by: Mack | April 10, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Since we don’t know anything about Obama, let us look at his actions and the company he keeps.
Posted by: Roger MIller | April 10, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Anyone who uses the phrase “no surprises” in a sentence about the Clintons is clearly out of touch. There are ALWAYS surprises with the Clintons.
Posted by: DMR | April 10, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Steve Jones, we know the entire problem that our nation is facing so I have made the decision to support Hillary Clinton but it seems like doesn’t work out because many of the liberal Dem do not like her unfortunately.
Posted by: stock_craft | April 10, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Jake,
What would you expect Obama to do?
Posted by: maritza | April 10, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Thank you. Just another reason to question Obama’s judgement. I’m sure that if he wins the nomination, the republicans will eat him alive in November. The audacity of arrogance!
Posted by: anne | April 10, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Ironic that Obama would not denounce and reject Ayres especially after the statement “I don’t regret setting bombs… I feel we should have done more.”
Does Obama have this same tolerence and understanding for young black kids charged with drug offenses in Illinois? No way. Here is a list of the legislation he supported while in the IL senate, all mandating increased sentences for drug offenses:
In an August 19, 2004 entry on Obama’s website he bragged about being tough on drugs:
During 8 years in the state senate, Senator Obama has repeatedly voted for tougher penalties for drug offenders. [HB 3387, 5/13/03; P.A. 93-0546; SB 1793, 3/21/03; P.A. 93-0223; HB 2347, 5/6/99; P.A. 91-0336; HB 3170, 5/7/98; P.A. 90-0674; HB 1278, 5/14/99; P.A. 91-0403; SB 0105, 3/23/99; P.A. 91-0263; HB 2843, 5/20/03; P.A. 93-0596; 93rd GA, SB 2447, 3/25/04; P.A. 93-0884; SB 1578, 3/24/03; P.A. 93-0297; SB1028, 4/2/98; SB 1028, 5/19/98, SC HA1,4; P.A. 90-0775; HB 0070, 5/16/97; P.A. 90-0382; HB 2844, 5/13/03; P.A. 93-0340; HB 3073, 4/4/00; P.A. 91-0802; HB 0252, 5/7/99; P.A. 91-0366; HB 5652, 5/9/02; SB 1332, 2/24/00; P.A. 91-0899; HB 4245, 5/7/02; P.A. 92-0698; SB 0014, 5/20/97, SC HA1; P.A. 90-0397; SB 0003, 4/6/01; HB 2015, 5/9/97; P.A. 90-0164; SB 1011, 4/5/01; SB 1224, 3/24/98; HB 2030, 5/15/97; P.A. 90-0557]
Ayres is definitely fodder for the Republican attack machine and will not play well with most Americans. It feeds into Wright’s anti-American ravings and also Obama’s communist mentor back in Hawaii.
Does Obama like or respect anyone “normal”? Why does his coterie of friends look like a political freak show??
He is a hypocrit; he consistently voted to increase drug sentences in IL and also voted to try children as adults there. I guess in his warped view, political crimes get a free pass, but if you are a kid and commit a crime you go to adult prison and if you use drugs, you should do hard time.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 10, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Yep, this IS reaching, and these are the distractions Obama is talking about.
No matter who is running for office of the Presidency, we will always have these type distractions from the real issues, especially when it comes to running against the republicans. They always push that democrats want to raise taxes and provide handouts and inflate government. So far from the truth, and take a look at what the republicans have done to this country in the last 8 yrs. That is what we want to continue???
So yep, they will always provide distractions from the serious issues to continue pushing their agenda….continuous war, continuous outsourcing, trade agreements that benefit foreign sources instead of americans. They will continue to line their pockets and screw the little guy.
While the “little guy” population is growing, they are living more and more comfortable. And these are the policies we want to continue? But its more important to make more out of a casual acquaintance than to discuss serious issues. THAT is the way the lying republicans remain in office, as public ignorance keeps feeding on the distractions.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | April 10, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
I think you are a Sean Hannity wannabe. Nice job at “cutting edge” news reporting.
Posted by: Neil | April 10, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Where are the libs talking points, I mean most unpopular war, War is never popular, but it is a necessity at times, especially when an enemy is appeased for a long time.
Economy is in a recession?? Interesting the experts are all saying we will not know if we are in a recession until really its over, so now libs know more then experts. But the fact is this is a self caused slow down by the lib media and libs, when you constantly yell the economy is bad, people start fearing and then it starts.
There have been more millionaires created in the last 7 years then any time in history!
Why dont you libs start complaining about your own politicians, which it seem the lib politicians are the richest thee are, or celebrities who make millions but do not contribute.
Oh better yet why has not Obama donated money, well I know he only wants to donate everyone else’s money!!
Yes keep attacking corporations who EMPLOY Millions of people, yes they are enemy.
Attack the oil company why you drive your elitist car!!
Hypocrits!!
Posted by: spock | April 10, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Maritza wrote: “Jake, What would you expect Obama to do? “
I am not Jake but I will answer this question. For the sake of our nation and the benefit of Dem party, Obama should drop out the race and support Hillary to win back the White House. At the meantime, he should concentrate more on public service works and clean up his Church. Then there is a chance for him to be the US President for the next 12-16 years.
Posted by: stock_craft | April 10, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
They have answered your questions about the relation, they have told you what is his opinion and you can tell for yourself why he know the man.
Why this is news is FOX want to smear him. So what you want to do? Follow the act. BS
Posted by: John | April 10, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
TDH,
Thanks for the instructive post. Interesting observation on possible connection between TUCC and Weathermen.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 10, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Now for the rest of the story. Bill Clinton pardoned another member of the Weather Underground as well as numerous FALN bombers!
Posted by: Brian | April 10, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
OBOMBER lovers….
First of all….
GOV.Rendell is a great guy ( was Mayor of Phila, and before that District Attrny who got elected without using other peoples words (Patrick Deval)
This is part of being VETTED BY THE PUBLIC for anyone who is running for President——– must face —————->>>>>>
OVER AND OVER AGAIN
….. tired of it?….don’t get online…. or stick with the huffington post…..they are ga ga over this Obomber
Posted by: carpenter.nyc | April 10, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
The issue of Obama’s electability against a republican attack machine is huge.
-Cocaine use
-Wright and his church of 20 years
-Farakhan and Ghadafi
-Desire to meet terrorists and rogue
leaders aka Hezbollah and Amadinajad
-most Liberal voting record in the senate.
-absolutely no history of by-partisan voting or legislation contraty to his rhetoric
-Rezko
-Weather underground
-visits to Pakistan while on brak in college.
The list is very long. Some speculate he would not even meet the requirements for top security clearance.
The Republicans will use these aginst him. They just will
Add not counting MI and FL in to the mix and probably not winning Penn or Ohio either and the guy is just plain unelectable.
People need to stop the romanticised and slightly juvenile idealistic notions about his candidacy and take a long hard look at his real chances of being elected to the white house.
I would say they are slim to none.
Posted by: s.b. | April 10, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Thanks Jake and abc. You are the only network that informs us concerning Obama’s history. We don’t need all the biased reporting – we need facts. I just hope it won’t be too late. People need to hear this. So many of the networks are in the tank for Obama. Do people dislike Hillary so much that they would go with Obama – not knowing who is really is.
Posted by: judy | April 10, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
kurt,maritza and steve jones,do you have to be led by the nose or is it that you have drunk so much kool aid it is affecting your thinking.like i have said before taken by itself it is only a slight troubling association,taken in with obamas history of associating since childhood [he speaks of thease associations in his own book]with radical left marxist antiamericans it is a deal breaker for most americans.please in your enlightened state tell me what else someone should take from his associations with frank davis[uncle frank in his book also a memeber of the communist party usa]marxist professors in college that he sought out,rev wright whose antiamerican retoric he sat and listened to for 20 years,ayers in whose house obama was first inroduced to the people of his district to run for state senate and who obama has had dealings with over a number of years,rezko who has significant ties to very questionable middle east players and lets not forget his father who he praises that was fired by kennata in kenya for his communist viewpoints.all of this adds up to paint a very troubling picture of someone who touts his judgement.no sir this man must not be allowed in the whitehouse.GO HILLARY
Posted by: don tufts | April 10, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I wonder why Jake keeps silent about the fact that Ben Smith at Politico had a long story this two weeks or so ago; Drudge linked to it of course, but it went nowhere, for obvious reasons. Is it because Jake ‘lends’ at LOT of Ben Smith’s stories; the last one about Bill in Colombia as well?
Anyway, there’s no future for this ridiculous smear attempt; everytime it sticks to the ones that run it.
Posted by: gregory | April 10, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Times change, people change. Can’t be held accountable for everyone we know in life. And one other thing I’d like to point out. There are a lot of us who are direct decendants of revolutionarys. I believe that is how this country was formed. Everyone that live here and enjoys what freedoms we have left is enjoying the fruits of a revolution. Lighten up a little people. You are really digging here to find fault.
Posted by: Sharon | April 10, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
“Perhaps you think this is all a silly political smear.” You betcha.
It must be a comforting thought for the Republican attack machine that you are out there, Jake Tapper, doing their dirty job for them.
How unselfish of you to take on the heavy burden of thoroughly vetting Obama before the moron voter audience. As you suggest, they will believe anything, so you might as well give it to them right away.
You are a fine man, Tapper.
Now, go on and censor me as usual. Do your thing.
Posted by: Niels | April 10, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Didn’t Bill Clinton pardon the Weatherundergound when he left office.
Jake are you reporting on this?
Posted by: maritza | April 10, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Obama keeps very interesting and worrisome company.
Of course, it should give voters pause, enough time to think how much of Senator Obama’s appeal is in the vague, dreamy promise of “change” and “hope.” The idea that voters and the press shouldn’t demand asnwers to tough lines of questioning is ludicrous. These candidates aren’t running for the Safety Patrol. This is the Presidency of the United States.
BO needs vetting just like every other candidate. It’s hard to imagine McCain or Clinton not brought to task on these realtionships: Wright, Ayers and Rezko. The press would be all over it. It’s a matter of judgement. If you can’t choose your friends with care, what can you do judiciously?
I know, I know, I’m just nonbeliever, a political crank. But then, I haven’t been drinking the Obama juice either. You guys ever watch the Invasion of the Body Snatchers?
Posted by: Peggy Sue | April 10, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Well, I’m confused. I thought I read on the lead in he was a “distinguished Professor of Education and Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago”? Maybe we need to investigate the University and anyone who has graduated from it. I don’t like anyone bombing anything here, but what did Ayers do, was he convicted of a crime? I can’t imagine any university having a professor who did something like that. It is confusing..did Bill Clinton pardon him like he did the FALN terrorists? Bill Clinton KNEW who he granted clemency to.
Obama was 8 years old? That means a lot. We better go back thru those elementary school records.
It’s time to stop this kind of reporting. There are events unfolding today about the Clinton’s personal business dealings that scare me a whole lot more. If we went thru their sorted past with what they were directly tied to much less who they served on boards with, there wouldn’t be room on this blog to cover half of it.
Posted by: Confused | April 10, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
If Obama gets the nomination, then even pedophiles will start running for office of the POTUS. According to some, everything is allowed.
This is unacceptable.
Posted by: Roger MIller | April 10, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Yes Hill is vetted that is why there is the Colombiagate and the Bosniagate or the Snipergate. Let us not try to make sense of nonsense. Yesterday it was about his former pastor, the day before that it is about the newspaper of his Church which has recognized Farrakhan and today it is somebody who is living close to his house. Tomorrow it will be the dog he had when the was living in Hawai.Obama is telling to America what he can do for America, he has earned lot of respect and is winning, can we believe that the millions of people who voted hor Obama are not stupid. Ed can say anything what he wants to say, but his beloved friend “Hillary the Bosnian General” the Commander in Chief of the snipers’ bridage in Bosnia will not succeed. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | April 10, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Jake, do you really not think that Hillary ties to Doug Coe’s The Family are much more relevant for the way power will be used in this country?
It is still a highly active secretive group that jokingly calls itself the “Christian Maffia”, and it is all about a Christian conservative variety of Scientology’s world power fantasies. Coe’s favorite example of organising power is Adolf Hitler, who he compares to Jesus Christ. Hillary, in her Living History book, calls him a spiritual adviser and a friend.
No, the GOP wouldn’t jump this because many Christian conservative Republicans have ties to Coe as well. Which only makes the issue MORE important and interesting for a journalist to investigate, I would think.
But well, if bashing Obama is the mission, I guess The Family will be covered in silence?
Posted by: maria | April 10, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
1. Bill Clinton is not running for president.
2. The stuff about the pardons is not new information. All the crap is already out there.
3. There is nothing to prove that Bill is friends with the Weather Underground group.
Posted by: Joan | April 10, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
But Joan – The point is she is running on a “Two for one” platform, she is running using Bill’s experience..that is why people bring it up.. that and the fact that if you are going to sling mud some of it is going to stick to you too, and the Clinton campaign hasn’t figured out that they need to fact check their stories and their own pasts before they open their mouths…
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
THE DEMOCRATIC LEADERS OUGHT TO KNOW IN NOVEMBER ELECTIONS,THAT OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE.
POLITICS ARE POLITICS,BUT AT THE END OF THIS CAMPAIGN THE LEADERS MUST DECIDE FOR THE BEST OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE.
THE PICTURE WITH THE ANTI-AMERICAN PASTOR WRIGHT WILL BE ON TV 24/7.
Posted by: NIcholas | April 10, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
NOBAMA wrote: “HEY HILLARY SUPPORTERS…SEND THIS STORY TO PELOSI, DEAN, AND THE SUPERDELEGATES IN YOUR STATE.
THIS GUY IS NEVER GOING TO WIN AND THE SUPERDELEGATES NEED TO KNOW HOW BAD THIS IS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
LET YOUR VOICES BE HEARD BY THEM….”
Are those Dem Leaders blind or deaf? Someone think they are deaf because they don’t want to hear the voices of Florida and Michigan voters. But I think they are selfish more likely. They don’t want to make the black voters angry. Welcome for your comment.
Posted by: stock_craft | April 10, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
John McCain and his associates are responsible for the deaths of 4,000 + Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
Who’s associates are worse?
Posted by: AkaDad | April 10, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
The Obamas shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near the White House…I don’t even think he is fit for the Senate. Since when do we want anti-American radicals being cogs in the governmental wheel? BO’s cabinet will be made up with a group of radical anti-American, anti-Semitic, racist nut cases…yeah, that will do a lot for America’s image abroad. As it is they think we are the stupidest people on earth for electing Bush twice.
Hillary is the only sane choice in this contest. Please, PA, vote Hillary…let’s end the crazy Michelle and Barack go to Washington story.
Posted by: ann | April 10, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Lauren,
Ayres was prosecuted. The case was dismissed for what amounts to prosecutorial misconduct, the illegal surveillance. I cannot help but think that Ayres very influential father had his hand in that.
Note, those were pre-Patriot Act days, when we still have a 4th Amendment. Today the government can virtually listen and on anything and offer it into evidence if it is terrorist related. Evidence against Ayres was.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 10, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
“Maria, I have a shocker for you. Obama went to Coe’s prayer meetings too.”
I knew that, I follow the news as well. Makes the Coe figure and the Family even more interesting, doesn’t it?
My point however is that Hillary calls Coe her spiritual adviser and friend (in Living History) and that her ties to Coe are particularly strong and personal.
Bill Clinton invited Rev. Wright, remember, as one of the church leaders to confess his Monica sins to. That doesn’t make Wright Bill’s pastor yet.
The existence of The Family in Washington, the heart of our democracy, is a disturbing phenomenon. It amazes me that political journalists like Jake pay no attention to it, certainly if we consider that the scary Doug Coe is Hillary’s friend and spiritual adviser.
Posted by: maria | April 10, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
M
I have seen that around at least a week ago. Also, quotes from an unidentifed Democratic source that John and Elizabeth Edwards thought Obama was aloof, condescending, and arrogant. And, that was after Obama’s visit to their home. In fact Obama got into a yelling match with Elizabeth over his health care plan. Elizabeth thinks it is a crock that he is still asserting he has a plan for universal health care.
Posted by: countallthevotes | April 10, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
The key to this story is to look into how Ayers and Dohrn were able to avoid prison time. All I’ve been able to find out is that “most charges were dropped because of prosecutorial misconduct during the long search for the fugitives.” I think that in fact both Ayers and Dohrn were from very well-off family. This relationship is pertinent to the discussion because Ayers and Dohrn helped Obama get into politics in Chicago.
Posted by: svsolis | April 10, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
If Ayers becomes a real issue with obama, Oprah will hire a the MSM for another round of the Golden Tongues speeches, where he will again stand on a staircase, gazing serenely unto heaven, while a bright godly light shines down upon him and the angels sing. At this point the obama followers will go prone and sing praises to their almighty. So what else is new? Obama will continue to sidestep on any negative issues and eventually turn that around so he can blame Hillary Clinton.
If obama gets the nomination, it will be a shoo-in for John McCain, as McCain will be elected. There is no way that the white middle-class Americans, women, Latino, Asians will vote for Obama and therein is the vote that really matters, because these voters will outnumber those in the below thirty generation who won’t even bother to show up at the polls. obama is lots of talk, lots of speeches, lots of dishonesty, lots of typical politician and lots of bull.
Posted by: Lou | April 10, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
LOL! It is thanks to Bill Clinton that Ayres is a Professor these days.
And it is thanks to the former likes of war monger McCain that Ayres 40 years ago became so desperate that he decided to go underground.
America, America, land of the brave.
Posted by: hart | April 10, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Obama attended the Senatorial Prayer breakfast that all, or almost all, the Senators, as well as many others, attend each year. He did not attend the private prayer circles or become a member of the “family” which practices a certain type of religion in which the “Jesus of the meek” is not the Jesus they worship. However, Hillary did. Incidentally, Andrea Mitchell, whose husband just announce his endorsement for another candidate is THE ONLY REPORTER who has even claimed that Obama attended the general prayer breakfast and she purposely tried to treat this breakfast as if it was not an EVENT (WHICH IT IS) totally separate from the regular memberships daily & weekly worship ceremonies.
Posted by: shelgirl | April 10, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
I full agree with Buck who wrote>>>
While there have been stories written about why Edwards hasn’t endorsed either candidate.. this have never been one of the reasons. Where did this come from? He hasn’t stated this publicly. How do you know this to be fact? If it is, maybe a source would be appropriate.
Posted by: M | April 10, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
BKMC,
Why is it that you turn every story which vets your candidate into an attack on Hillary Clinton? Why not defend your candidate? Is it because you can’t think of anything to defend him with?
=======================================
Obama, Edwards rejects his health care plan!
Obama, not strong enough to deal with Republican attacks
Obama, generally spineless (I guess that’s not politics as usual)
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
What so their kids have played together and they know each other?
Why is that such a big deal?
It’s a big deal because it is another lie by the Obama camp, Ayers’ “kids” are adults and haven’t gone to that school for at least a decade.
Obama’s camp said they are “friendly” It doesn’t matter Obama was 8 when Ayers was blowing up places in America, since 9/11 he said the only thing he regrets is that he didn’t do more bombing. He said this while Freinds with Obama. Now I hope to hear the truth about Obam’s good friend Rezko and his friendship with Auchi, the guys that made money being friends With Saddam, no wonder Obama was agaisnt the war, his friend Rezko/Auchi made alot of money as long as Saddam was in charge.
Posted by: comet | April 10, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Press,
Please continue to ignore Obama on his relationships. He has already been blessed with a golden ticket. There is no need to question him on:
1. Wright
2. Farrakhan
3. Rezko
4. Ayres
5. Goolsby and Canada
6. Rockefeller and insults
Obama is not responsible for those with whom he has a relationship. He is not responsible for the inappropriate remarks of those on his campaign, only Hillary bears that level of responsibility.
To accuse Obama of wrongdoing in these relationships is equivalent to saying the guy that drives the getaway car has the same level of responsibility as the bank robber. That’s just absurd.
========================================
Obama, not responsible for anything.
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Comet,
I’m guessing you are probably not old enough to remember the “Weathermen”.
========================================
Obama, OK to hang with a “Weatherman”.
That is presidential.
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
You forgot to mention that the only reason Ayres is not in prison today is because the case got thrown out due to mistakes made by the FBI in gathering evidence, not because he wasn’t guilty. The company a person keeps speaks volumns…
Posted by: Firefighter | April 10, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
This is quite a stretch…….After all, cynics need something to chew on because they’re starving right now.
Hillary is down to the bone marrow.
Posted by: Common Sense | April 10, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Rendell is exactly right. The floodgates will open on Obama as soon as he’s the nominee. My guess is, Clinton already knows some of that dirt, but she can’t use it because they are vying for the same voters. She can’t risk ticking off Obama supporters whom if she wins, she will need in the general. This is why primaries are different from general elections. McCain won’t need ANY of Obama’s supporters to win, he won’t get those demographics anyway.. so the 527s will have NO ISSUE offending the hell out of them. He Can, and WILL get some of Hillary’s voters, however. That is the thing the media conveniently ignores. Hillary’s voters are more conservative and more likely to go to McCain than Obama’s. And that will be the difference in this election. Put it in the bank.
Posted by: Amazed | April 10, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
WestCoast I was responding to Posted by: maritza | Apr 10, 2008 11:37:59 AM
who said it was no big deal.
I personally have a BIG problems with Obam’s friendship with Ayers, Rezko, Auchi, and people that hate America.
As for how old I am , it’s funny I’m close in age to Obama, who is considerred Young, but since I can see thru his lies, I fall in the Old Women group
Posted by: Comet | April 10, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Ayers – Donated a mere $200 to the Obama campaign. Never pardoned. Has raised money for the Obama campaign and he’s also got a long-standing relationship with Barack Obama. He hosted a fundraiser for Obama. He actively worked to secure Obama’s first electoral victory in Illinois. And, as recently as 2002, they worked together on the board of the Woods Fund — and, perhaps not-so-coincidentally, gave money to a group with ties to the P.L.O.. Ayers along with several members of the weather underground was responsible for bombing U.S. Federal buildings and plotting to bomb the Pentagon and the United States Capitol. Ayers wife was also jailed for robbery with members of the Black Panthers. Ayers told the New York Times in 2001 the day after 9?11
“I don’t regret setting bombs; I feel we didn’t do enough.”
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Comet,
My apologies. You are no old woman. You are a wise woman.
========================================
Obama, the wise can see what you are about!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Whatever,
Your post could have been erased if it mentioned the current V.P’s first name or consultant Morris’s first name.
========================================
Obama, does he have a spine?
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
From Jerusalem:Sen. Barack Obama was paid to serve on the Board of Directors for The Woods Fund alongside confessed domestic terrorist William C. Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1971.
While Obama served on the board, The Woods Fund granted funding ($40,000 in 2001 and $35,000 in 2002) to a controversial Arab group (Arab American Action Network) that mourns the establishment of Israel as a “catastrophe” and supports intense immigration reform, including providing drivers licenses and education to illegal aliens.
The co-founder of the Arab group in question, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi’s wife Mona, is president of AAAN or Arab American Action Network. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group. The group co-sponsored a Palestinian art exhibit, titled, “The Subject of Palestine,” that featured works related to what some Palestinians call the “Nakba” or “catastrophe” of Israel’s founding in 1948.
To those who say Obama’s connections are “not a big deal”, they are a BIG DEAL to Americans who value Democracy and the safety of our children. Obama reveals to us the man he truly is by the company he keeps and associates with.
Posted by: rs | April 10, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Good company there, Jake, and West Coasts Mess — Hannity, Fake News and Carl Rove.
This is a nothing story. As is the Palmer running/not running/running story.
And all the speculation about why The Edwards haven’t endorsed Obama are just that — in fact, wild speculation in some cases!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | April 10, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
common sense and whatever,so its ok or obama to have associated since childhood with many different antiamerican marxist people and this does not trouble you in the least?what bothers some of us is what if what he says now in the election are just words,but thease words are not his core beleifs,what if his core beleifs are antiamerican marxist claptrap and he hides it really well because he has been groomed and is a great actor.this is a not so far from reality senario and even if its a little off its not worth taking a chance of putting someone in the oval office that is even just a little sympathatic to antiamerican views.
Posted by: don tufts | April 10, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
The three we are left with are unacceptable for reasons which are obvious to any sane person. Some group of powerful and responsible persons( are there any left in the US?) should prevail on Mayor Bloomberg to run for POTUS.
Posted by: icr | April 10, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Don- BOTH of the candidates bother me in their own special way..what bothers me the most is when they throw mud at each other and think that the American people are too dumb to look up the past. When they lie outright and think we are so spoon fed from the media that we will never find out about it. Facts are this is going to be one or the other of them and this kind of media and rumors that are set out here for us to lap up make me sick. If it weren’t for the whole McCain thing I would have turned the channel on this a long time ago- but people need to know the truth about things ( both of the candidates) so McCain never has a chance. Anyone looked at HIS healthplan proposal lately? Elizabeth Edwards spoke about that too- she bascially says it scares the heck out her and the American people aren’t being told about it.
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
I am truly disturbed by the details of Senater Obama’s past and present friends. These blogs can get a little silly sometimes (me included), but I didn’t know about Palmer, The Weatherman, and the New Black Panthers. Who else is this guy assosiated with?
Posted by: Jim | April 10, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Jackt51,
The heart of the story is that Obama has not been vetted. The press has given him a pass. I think they’re assuming that Obama gets the nomination, at which time it will turn ugly, and the fall contest will be extremely interesting. I guarantee the R’s will spare no mercy in vetting come that time.
At this point, given the press’s behavior, and a public that has been clearly defined by the phrase attributed to P.T. Barnum in the 1800′s, the by all means let’s run Obama through the grindstone at that time.
I’ll be more than happy to support Hillary in a run against McCain in four years if it turns out that way.
=======================================
Obama, why vet him? He has a golden ticket?
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
WestCoastMessenger
The problem is not that Obama has not been fully vetted. You guys are missing the point. The press is not giving him a pass. Certainly the Wright issue got more press coverage than any other issue in this Presidential election. The problem is that Obama doesn’t have much baggage and the few things that are dug up are all guilt by association (Wright, Ayers, Farakhan, Michelle Obama, etc.). Most Americans do not believe in holding one man accountable for another man’s actions. Maybe you can try that in Ghana or Nigeria or some other third world country.
Posted by: Kevin | April 10, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Whatever,
They got mine too, probably that bad word I mentioned. OK, back to the issues for Kevin’s sake. Does Obama have a spine or not? Does the press need to vet him for that? The constitution does not require a spine in order to be president!
=======================================
Obama, no vetting, no spine needed!
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 10, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
the problem is even though i support hilary [my wife and i have given since dec $1500 ,i will not support ANYONE who has had consistant marxist associations for most of his life! i am more than content to hold my nose and vote for mcain and then start to work towards 2012 and hillary running against him after the far left has discredited themselves.you just do not take a chance withsomeone who might harbor antiamerican of liberationist thinking period.
Posted by: don tufts | April 10, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
WCM and Dogsoldier-The issue at hand should be that both of them ( whether it is them or their family ) have ties to undesireable people… there will always be stories about this kind of garbage- Hopefully you can tell I am a rational person and that I check the facts on the candidates- I voted for Obama I respect him..I will vote for Hillary if that is my choice.. it just boggles my mind that any rational human being can think that this constant bickering between the campaigns can do any body (but McCain) any good! We should end our posts with things like this. To me this is the real enemy ( nice old man or not)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
McCains Healthplan doesn’t cover pre existing conditions.. not even asthma
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Yesterday – Yesterday the Obama groupies were screaming because Clinton made the call to ask world leaders to boycott the Olympic opening ceremonies because Clinton acted without thinking. Guess what, Obama groupies, today Obama joined Clinton and McCain calling for leaders to boycott the Olympic opening ceremonies. Hillary just got to lead the “boy” around like a child.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
WestCoastMessenger
Obama has been vetted. If he wasn’t vetted, we wouldn’t be hearing all this stupid things about who he knows and who’s hand he shook, or who’s church he attended or whatever. But they just don’t have the punch Hillary’s problem have because we do not crucify people in this country based on guilt by association. Regarding Bosnia, it was Hillary herself that lied, not someone associated with her. When a man commits a terrible crime, do we go and arrest his mother and father and lock them in jail? No. Some people like you care about issues like these. But i can assure you that not enough people care for it to have an impact. People like you are in the minority because, unlike most Americans, you are LOOKING for a reason to hate Obama. I don’t care if someone is the Pope or Saint Peter, if you want to hate them, you will find good reasons to hate them. But look at the polls. The fact remains that not one single person has managed to show that Obama shares these views. Everything the man has said and done his entire life shows that he doesn’t. But people like you want us to discount everything the man has said and done, and instead crucify him by association. That is incredibly flawed logic.
Posted by: Kevin | April 10, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
OOH I have another one from Elizabeth Edwards too-
McCain’s Healthplan will only issue a $5,000 tax credit per person to pay for medical bills- the healthplans that we buy through our work are gone..goooone if we elect him … 5,000 bucks folks – Hope you don’t get sick!
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
I read previously that Obama had ties to Ayres, and underhanded underground crook in his day. And he still has ties to Ayers and Ayres. I don’t know of any candidate that ran for office of the presidency had a past like Obama. He hides the fact that he is racial and uses the white people for his own advantage. Going for 20 years to a racist church with a racist pastor tells me he is not fit to be our president. I am glad that Hillary is leading in PA 49% – 41% and just picked up three new superdelegates. Things are starting to look up for a change and maybe he won’t be so arrogant when that happens.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 10, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
whatever – Yesterday a Canadian blogger who joins ABC blogging sites from time to time said he noticed that both the Obama and Hillary sides were growing further apart. I noticed that myself. He’s right. The dye is cast. There is no going back now.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
In summary: Obama sucks and is a liar
Posted by: bob | April 10, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Michelle Obama said that for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country. That statement in and of itself although stupid at first did not mean that much to me, then came the Rev. Wright and his Goddamn america sermons,and the fact the America was to blame from everything from aids to 9/11. Then you add in Ayers and the weather underground, church bullitens with op eds by Hammas, links of Rezko to an Iraqi businessman in Panama and you suddenly start connecting the dots. You finally see why Michelle was not proud of her country,just look who they were associating themselves with and the picture starts to come into focus! If you knew that you were going to run for president why would you continue such associations, knowing what conclusions that others may draw? I feel that even though Obama may not endorse all the things Wright and Ayers stand for or say he must feel some sort of kinship and share some of their liberal ideology otherwise he would not associate himself with them for 20+ yrs. Obama I feel is a left wing idealouge who has at his core beleif ameica is to blame for most of the worlds problems,and that our government is basically corrupt and evil. It is because of these ties to radical thinkers that will allow the republicans to connect the dots in such a way as to define him as someone who is so outside the mainstream that america can not trust him! For all of his supporters to think that just because the MSM is not talking about these connections and who would ever beleive such stories should ask John Kerry,who said the same thing!
Posted by: russell | April 10, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
“Tell me who your friends are and I’ll tell you who you are”
This saying speaks to the kind of company Obama keeps >> Wright, Michelle, Ayres, Rezko, etc.
Posted by: Haha | April 10, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
WestCoastMessenger
We live in a fair country and most people have decided to treat Obama fairly. But folks like you just hate the man and regardless of how much good he does, you don’t care, you will nitpick throught he facts trying to dig up dirt. You give the man no credit for anything good. Your bias and anger has blinded you. It has rendered everything you say about the man non-credible. I mean it’s funny. Everyday i come in here defending Obama while you bash him. I have never heard you try to uplift your own candidate. In fact, i am not even sure who your candidate is. It seems as if you live to just insult this man and tear him down. Reasonable people see right through your BS. Your negativity permeates through your writing like the stench of dung and chokes the crap out of reasonable folks like me. It’s putrid. But thank God, you are a minority. That’s why Obama still leads in the polls. Obama does nothing for me. He doesn’t pay my bills or feed my kid. But i watch both candidates with an open mind and have made my decision. I still like Clinton. If she wins, i will support her without reservation.
Posted by: Kevin | April 10, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Dogsoldier- It is starting to seriously frighten me that people may vote for the other party out of spite..or not vote at all. It is hard to come on these and feel like your candidate is being attacked , when you truly believe in something it feels like a personal attack..I feel it sometimes too- but there has to be a way to make it work ( see there is my Obama dreamer like self I am sure you are thinking). I think the candidates need to address it ..TOGETHER.
McCain’s plan for oil costs to go down is to ask us to sacrifice and go without- yep that’s a plan
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
S- the proof is listed on his Website under his issues and policies, not to mention an interview where Elizabeth Edwards basically begs the people to demand more answers..she did the ground work for us…now it is up to us to start asking for the truth about John McCain
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
S- the proof is listed on his Website under his issues and policies, not to mention an interview where Elizabeth Edwards basically begs the people to demand more answers..she did the ground work for us…now it is up to us to start asking for the truth about John McCain
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
whatever
I see. Elizabeth Edwards says.
Wow!
Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
dogsoldier: The Obama camp is just upset because Hillary got the jump ahead of them regarding the boycotting. Now Obama wants to join Hillary. Obama’s camp is nothing but a bumch of punks that think they own the world. And they are the no nothing kind but think they do. They need to get a grip on life and grow up.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 10, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
S- You are missing the point! Shouldn’t we be asking? Shouldn’t we want to know what the fine print says? I’m sorry when someone says something like that( that is unbiased and “doesn’t have a dog in the race” I sit up and pay attention unless we make it a big deal it will be too late. Mock me if you want to but I think it is important to know.
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Kevin: Years ago people judged you by the company you kept. Obama kept company with anti-american’s and that’s why some people will still judge him by that. Ayres and Ayers are not the people he should have been associating with, he knew exactly what and who they were. But being a boozer and drugger himself while in college I am suprised he graduated unless they pushed him thru to get rid of him. He is not as bright as people think he is. He is a make believe. Copies everything in sight. Adds other presidents words to his speeches. All Obama is looking for is to make history first the presidency is second. Hopefully he never makes it.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | April 10, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
whatever – I work in the oil business for big oil. Currently we get the loin’s share of oil from Canada 2586 thousand of barrels per day followed by Saudi Arabia coming in at a distant second at 1503 thousands of barrels per day. There are other smaller amounts such as Venezuela @ 1290 bpd. The energy crunch will get worse. We leave Iraq and if you think you’re paying a lot at the pump now then I have bad news for you. BTW, we only get 543 barrels per day from Iraq. Furthermore, if Iran gets the nuke they’ve been working on where oil prices climb is beyond imagination right now. That my friend is what is waiting for the new president on day one. A middle east in flames when we pull out. Fill your gas tank then.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
carpenter.nyc
Even if we believe your story, what’s wrong with giving money to a church that ahs a very broad, very generous community outreach program?
Posted by: Kevin | April 10, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Mariann Pepitone – Wright. Hillary is a leader. Today the world is following her suggestion. That’s leadership.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
kevin
By your logic, what’s wrong wish mosques forwarding their money to terrorists?
Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Dogsoldier-
So what is the answer then? Perpetual occupancy of Iraq? I know you don’t feel that way.. I do however find it funny that you work for Big Oil as I myself work for Big Insurance lol- Let me tell you what candidate they want us to support- but I doubt I even need to. Everyday I see people ordered to deny healthcare to people for government programs..every single day. It breaks my heart but I have to do it- otherwise MY family has no coverage- To me it sure makes this arguement within the Democrats seem ridiculous.
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
I feel sorry for the Obama family. I know there is no way i can stand for this sort of abuse. Now i see clearly why blacks are still in the gutter in this country. All this Obama criticism isn’t rooted in any type of logic. It’s all hate. That’s the only explanation for this anger and vitriol.
Posted by: Kevin | April 10, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
KEVIN
I guess nothing at all.
Guess we are all talking about nothing that will harm Obama in anyways….the polls show he is up, he has crowd swooning and fainting….money up the gazoo ( certainly enough to buy the election ) all this I guess will just disappear and we will suddenly all see the light as the Obama Camp wants us to,
Yes– I am talking nothing.
But I have one vote, and I am so happy to have this one vote in THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD.
Just one voter here talking nothing.
Posted by: carpenter.nyc | April 10, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Kevin
You have apparently ignored the Obama follows hate directed at Clinton. Like different rules for for your guy, huh?
Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
It doesn’t seem to me that Kevin supports that sort of hate either- let’s be fair to him and to other supporters of both candidates that want to see the vileness stop from both sides. I think it is that whole guilt by association thing again :)
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
As a Whiteman in this great country, it saddens me that people cannot discuss the issues. Sean Hannity and people like him intentionally ignore the serious issues that separate Republicans from Democrats, and instead choose to demonize a man and tear him down. Demonize his wife and tear her down. They do not want to discuss the issues because they know they will lose that battle. They claim to be Conservatives and claim their ideology is superior, but they will rahter discuss anything but that ideology. Sean Hannity has made his entire show for the last two months an Obama bashing festival. In this great country, in this day and age, such public lynching occurs to a man that has committed no crime. A man that has always strived to do public good at every turn. In this day and age. In this great country. What a shame. I adre you peopel to discuss the issues. Discuss the bloody issues. The world is watching America. We say we are the greatest nation on earth. This is our time to prove that we can treat a minority striving for the highest office in the land, fairly. History will remember this day. If Obama loses, let him lose on the issues. Let him lose on the issues for heavensakes.
Posted by: Kevin | April 10, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Never feel SORRY for the Obamas’!!!
40 Million in the bank just from March and 55 Million from February….
They are high on the hog,
All this chatter actually benefits them….keeps their name on the news…free publicity, and they get to keep some of the Millions.
Besides they don’t really care what the pundits say— as long as it doesn’t affect the polls……. good example is the Rev Wright story…. some people actually like Obama more since that broke cause it gave Obama an excuse to give a “GREAT RACE SPEECH”…..in front of like 100 U.S. flags…plus all the networks played it— and Obama didn’t have to pay a cent for all that coverage…..
Plus it hindered the rumors of him being a Muslim…..instead we find out he supports the theology of James Cone, the father of the Black Liberation sermons…..
All I can say is…..
Thank God I have a Vote.
Thank God we have freedom speech and Thank God for the Internet cause it sure is making this Election the most interesting yet!
Posted by: carpenter.nyc | April 10, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Kevin- people tend to go to another blog when people start making sense and agreeing- don’t take it personally it is hard for people to fight the good fight nowadays..it is easier to just tear people apart then concentrate on what a failure our government is. Have faith though- the numbers would not be where they are at if everyone felt the way they do on these blogs :)
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
kevin,one more time,first as a young man in his book he talks about uncle frank[frank davis comunist party usa]second he talks in his book about following his fathers path,sr obama adocated for cinfiscation of private property in kenya and critizied kenyatta for not following comunist doctrine,thats why he lost his government job,third while in collage in his own words sought out marxist professors,fourth souht out a black liberation church and stayed a memeber for 20 years listening to antiamericn claptap,fifth when first running for public office was introduced topeople of his state senate district at wiliam ayers home[wheather underground]and then continued to associate with him over time in various functions including the woods fund where theywere both on the board ,sixth long term asociation with rezko who had long time dealings with several very shady middle east players,seventh michaels statement about this being the first time she was proud of her country[what because a closet marxist is fooling the american public.thease are more than enough reason not to let him anywhere near the oval office under no circumstances.GO HILLARY 08 OR IF NOT 2012!
Posted by: don tufts | April 10, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
whatever – From some remarks people like us are not human. I can handle whatever comes my way. My fear, if and when we pull out of Iraq, that is unless McCain wins, Iran will get their nukes. The fundamentalists will take over in Iraq. Which in turn can set off a whole new cascade in other middle east states. Oil will shoot through the roof. And if Iran were to threaten Israel with nukes, with Israel sitting on 300+ according to best estimates then we could be the first human beings who witness a nuke war the likes none of us can imagine. Dear God I hope not. If we pull our troops the best we can then do is sit back and watch from the sidelines. That is waiting for the new president whether we like it or not.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
To Kevin: In order to discuss the issues, Obama would have to have a position on the issues. Obama’s position on the issues is to wait to see Hillary’s position on an issue, and then copy it, and pretend that it is his idea he is putting forward. Obama says in the debates frequently, that “we are basically the same on the issues, so people are really voting for the candidate that can bring about the best change in Washington” or something to that effect. So Kevin, it is in our best interests to look at Obama the man, to look at his wife Michelle, to look at the men and women he considers “friends and associates” and to look at the radical, racist, anti-semitic, anti-white beliefs that Obama has been following for at least 20 years. Now we are learning of a visit to Pakistan, drug and alcohol use, and we have to say, this man can’t deal with his own life, the internal conflicts, the identity crisis, let alone deal with the issues of the entire country. The powers that be that made him this puppet candidate, forgot to look in his closet good and hard. We, the people, will for the sake of our children.
Posted by: rs | April 10, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Dogsoldier- We ARE humans- working a job to pay the bills and not sucking off of society. I am so frightened by the inevitable war that we are being prepped for with the middle east right now- my boys are young but not young enough that one day they may be called upon to defend a war we have no place in and never have. I saw an old video of Cheney from ’94 I think talking about how going to war with Iraq is a “quagmire” that we would never be able to win.. it made me sick inside. He knew..this whole time he knew and chose to do the wrong thing -for money. And now? Infighting between candidates and parties that may tighten the noose around America’s neck for decades to come. Sends shivers down my spine, I mean can you feel it? From Canada to China to Iran tension building up and all eyes on us. And here we sit arguing about who’s friends with who and who may have been un-PC today.
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
whatever
Ever noticed that it’s some democrats who want to bring back the draft?
You can look it up.
Posted by: S | April 10, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Why would Obama appoint Daniel Kurtzer as his foreign relations advisor?
Posted by: Just curious | April 10, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
S- Thanks looked it up..some but not the majority..Still scary stuff though. I still think I will take my chances with the Dems though, at least they are Talking about getting us the heck out of there at this point I will take one of the candidates trying to end it over another trying to start another one..
Posted by: whatever | April 10, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Whatever – A man with a family like you does indeed have a whole heck of worries I do not. Even though we are on opposite sides here I do feel for the family man and their sons and daughters. Perhaps the world was always this way and only now with the 24 hour news cycle and the internet we are thrust into the madness inside our homes. Perhaps the crusader world may have seemed like ours. I sometimes thing we need to study the crusades in order to understand where we are right now. And even how they talked with each other. Perhaps there is something to that, who knows? Because we are right now where they were back then.
Posted by: Dogsoldier | April 10, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
vanessa, no one has to remind anyone about the Clintons running out of toilet paper in the ’90s while you are a tap tap tapping on your keyboard,
BUT SOMEONE should remind everyone about the prosperity and hope the Clintons kindled during the wonderful years of their tenure.
Stick with Obama. Oh you can’t!
He’s that Teflon Man….. who hides his wife and his pastor from the press to protect his image…..
The one whose loyalties appear not to be those of the United States.
Be careful who you vote for!
Be very very careful.
Posted by: eyes open | April 10, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
This culled from the Chicago Tribune:
“A close examination of Obama’s first campaign clouds the image he has cultivated throughout his political career: The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.
One of the candidates he eliminated, long-shot contender Gha-is Askia, now says that Obama’s petition challenges belied his image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights.
“Why say you’re for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates?” Askia said. “He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?”
In a recent interview, Obama granted that “there’s a legitimate argument to be made that you shouldn’t create barriers to people getting on the ballot.”
But the unsparing legal tactics were justified, he said, by obvious flaws in his opponents’ signature sheets. “To my mind, we were just abiding by the rules that had been set up,” Obama recalled.’
He stole that election!
Don’t let him steal this one!
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!
Posted by: questioner | April 10, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
McCain supported African terrorists and the apartheid government of South Africa.
Why does he get a pass?
Posted by: Colin | April 10, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
By any objective measure there’s nothing serious about this story.
Obama was a child when the Weathermen were active. Decades later when Ayers had become a local activist Obama ended up at an activist meet and greet at his home. So what? Aspiring politicians do lots of meet and greets — often with local activists. They don’t imply any actual connection. Ayers’s children went to the same school Obama’s children attend and Ayers evidently remains active in that school. Big deal. So someone assembled a speaking panel and put both Obama and Ayers on it. So what? Obama and Ayers, both local activists in their own way, end up serving on a board for a local organization. Whatever. Ayers once gave Obama a $200 dollar campaign contribution. A local activist donating (at a quite modest level) to a local politician — truly shocking.
The point is this: each of these instances amounts to a big fat zero. Some people want to add all those big fat zeros together thinking they’ll add up to something substantial. But the reality is you can add a billion zeros together and at the end of the day you’ve still got a zero.
Posted by: Ben | April 10, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Folks, you can all write what you want, but the fact has already been proven that a story like this simply is never going be headline news, as Hillary’s lies and Penn’s conflicting interests are. There’s no beef here, only rather mean insinuations.
The only beef in the GOP’s dirty case against Obama, as different from the actual debate on the real issues, is in the Wright tapes. Rezko is nothing, no Obama wrongdoing though bad judgment, but nothing compared to McCain’s CV with the Keating Five scandal and many other obscure dealings with lobbyists that will run his Straight Talk Express in to the ditch.
Is Wright dangerous for Obama? I think it become on his many strenghts; the great PA speech that impressed millons of Americans so much has been a forebode of that. Wright is already part of Obama’s case for change; not into Wright’s direction, on the contrary, away from it to the perfection of our union.
Only a man who fully knows the divisive elements in American (sub)culture can take that road of uniting the country. McCain will have nothing to offer, except for some old patriotic clichés, to compete with a politician who will inspire America to be REALLY proud again of its Constitution, its Bill of Civil Rights, its melting pot of races and religions, and its moral example of liberty and equality in the world. That pride, Obama will show us, is something we gotta earn, day by day, by living and acting up to the high standards of what our Constitution is all about.
Posted by: gregory | April 10, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
William Ayers, people…William Ayers!
Someone aspiring to the Presidency of the United States does not nurture an ongoing personal and professional relationship with a known and unrepentant domestic terrorist. Let alone sit in that church listening to that garbage for 20 years. He’s unfit to command and will bring ruin to our party in November.
Posted by: oldspice | April 10, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Oh that’s just his wacky, zany bomber friend. Everyone has one of those.
Posted by: Mack | April 10, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
why is it abc get’s it’s storys about obama from sean hannity? does george want a job with clinton or does he owe them something? i would rather a president who can talk with others without approving of all of there actions. the republicans only talk with like minded people thats why this country is hated all over the world. we wont talk with iran and syria but they are the only ones that can help in iraq–we also won’t talk to cuba but we have no problem with china–sean hannity and hal turner look it up
Posted by: michi | April 10, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Do your homework before you say this story is not important or relevant -
The Weather Underground was founded by Ayers – They killed 3 police officers during a botched bank robbery – trying to get money to fund their war against America – William Ayers own girlfriend was killed by a bomb meant to blow up an Army recruiting station. Obama knew all of this when he began the relationship – Even after 9/11 when Ayers boasted in his book about his exploits and desire to have done more – Obama remained close to him and his wife Bernadette Doyle, who was on the FBI’s 10 most wanted list. The participated in numerous speaking engagements together as well as serving on the Woods board together.
Thsi is not a case of guilt by association – this is a case of arrogance and ignorance – A man aspiring to the Presidency does not maintain a close personal and professional relationship with an unrepentant domestic terrorist. My God, what is wrong with you people supporting Obama – get your heads straight.
Posted by: oldspice | April 10, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Thank you for reporting this – I am sure this is something that MSNBC will not even come close to covering. I am sick of them and even called my cable company to try to have it removed from my cable channels.
As soon as the media plays some old footage of the bombings of the Weathermen this will have legs.
Maybe all those guys who were wounded and served in Vietnam might have something to say about Obama’s visit to Ayers house to get his “blessing” to go into politics.
I have never voted republican in my life. My whole family will vote McCain if Obama is the nominee. My father (a Navy Seal) my brother (a Marine in Vietnam) and my entire family are outraged that Obama can associate with not only Ayers, Wright but the PLO.
The media is NOT covering Obama fairly. Chris Matthews wishes it was Obama going up his leg and not just the feeling he gets when he hears him speak. MSNBC with Mika (just a mouthpiece for her father and brother who work for Obama’s campaign) , Tim Russert, Chris Matthews and yes, so sorry to say, Keith all need to stop drinking the Kool-aid and report the news with the obvious love fest for Obama going on.
People say the democrats will come together and vote Obama if he is the nominee. I am here to tell you that will not happen.
Posted by: catherine | April 10, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Ayers and Dohrn strike me as trust fund babies who are so removed from regular life that they don’t get how offensive they are – or care what damage they did to anyone else’s lives.
But I disagree with Rendell on his endless statements that the Clintons have been vetted – and just the last week is a good example. Did we know that the Clintons took almost a million from a government which stands aside while labor leaders are murdered? No. Did we know that Clinton has dealings with Dubai? No. Or about that deal in the Cayman Islands? Did we know that he was responsible for some pretty shoddy real estate deadling in PA? No. Involving the CATHOLIC church for pity’s sake? If the right wing looneys start looking at appointments in the Clinton administration – and I’m talking about high level appointments, not people you meet at the neighborhood park – there are going to be some very big surprises. Rendell loves to say that we only know half of it. My guess is that Rendell knows about half of it – about Bill Clinton.
Posted by: Mara | April 10, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Ayers? Terrorists? Money? Rezko? Auchi? Khalidi?
Perhaps that Laundry List Of Lies of mine has a few bits of truth?
Google every name and find out for yourselves. Don’t let ABC or CNN or Fox tell you your truth. Find it. And then spread the word.
It’s all savage but true politics . com
:)
click the nick and see for yourselves.
Posted by: 2009 | April 10, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Michi, they got the story from the law records – you see – unlike Obamatologists, Tom Cruise Fantasists, and generally clueless cultists, facts have a sickening way of always being able to be found.
And arrogance has a way of making you forget that the truth IS OUT THERE.
Posted by: 2009 | April 10, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
This is a huge story – and the commercials of the Weather bombings, etc. can be imagined already.
Typical Obama arrogance to assume that real voters are immune to these kinds of associations and the doubts they raise.
Obama’s been living in the primary bubble for too long, with the hands-off media.
Posted by: Martin | April 10, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
This is the Wright story, redux. Only this time, he’s not going to be able to wash it all away with a speech.
Posted by: Sue | April 10, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
The GOP will crush Obama under the weight of his associations. His entire adult life is filled with nefarious characters. Hillary cannot bring this up, but the reason she has vowed to stay in the race until the convention is so that the Democratic party has a viable candidate should all of this come out before Obama is the nominee. God Bless Hillary for staying in the race! There is still hope.
Posted by: HoosierSue | April 10, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
“His entire adult life is filled with nefarious characters”
LOL! You actually seem to think he only knows and met with the 4 or 5 shady people you were able to find? Any idea how many people a man like Obama is working with and talking to on a daily basis? Don’t you care about Obama’s Presidency of the Harvard Law Review for instance – and why not? Do you know that it is the world’s most presitigious law review? (of course you don’t). Do you care about the huge article Newsweek is running now about Obama’s very remarkable mother? It’s full of details on him as well, so go check it out!
You folks are a sad bunch of people who are allergic to the brilliance and greatness in a black man running for the Presidency.
Posted by: kingston | April 10, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
The Clinton campaign will not bring this up. You see, this opens up a BIG OL can of worms for the Clintons. Bill Clinton PARDONED several Weathermen during his presidency. Again, the Clintons knew ALL of these OBAMA supporters before Obama. We’ve all seen photos of the Clintons with Rezko, Rev. Wright, and now William Bill Ayers.
And by the way, McCain isn’t as clean as you think. Just wait until about July. I can’t wait…..
Obama/Zinni 2008
Posted by: Kimberly | April 10, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
The Rev. Wright and The Black Liberation Theology story has not been explained enough. At the same time period as The Weathermen group, the Black Panther movement was on, Black Muslims were increasing in numbers and many were chanting Black Power. An interview on National Public Radio last week by Terry Gross cleared many things up for me. Rev. James Cones was interviewed and explained why he wrote his books, which started The Black Liberation Theology movement. BLT was the Christian answer to the Black Muslim movement, with some of the same anger and hatred. BLT people were very impatient with the non-violent approach
of Dr. Martin Luther King. Dr. King was very deep into Southern Baptist teachings and firmly believed that was the way to approach the problems.
I’ll not take up anymore space but for one last thing. I think Obama didn’t go to the ceremonies for Dr. King was because of his BLT teachings. And remember he’s still a member of that church with it’s new BLT Rev.
Posted by: A C | April 10, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
FOX is starting some in depth coverage on William Ayers. Including some interesing video of recent speeches by Ayers. Barack Obama and William Ayers issue needs to be totally vetted. FOX is the only place I’ve seen coverage of it. Ayers was a danagerous dude.
Posted by: Brian R | April 10, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Don’t forget a future Obama superdelegate (Jimmy Carter) meeting with Hamas.
Posted by: John | April 10, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
That interview with the NYT came out on SEPT 11, 2001.
Posted by: Don | April 10, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Pat, I am sure Jack and Keith will just keep it in the lock box forever.
Posted by: Ken FL | April 10, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Do you think this will be mentioned elsewhere as well — can we NOW have some vetting please?
If every other news station had bothered to do its job a couple of months ago and reported any of this and the Rev. Wright 20-year relationship, this primary would be over by now and Hillary Clinton would be our nominee.
Think to yourselves, who benefits from sitting on this all this time? The media narrative that was sold to the voter with a big shovel was that Sen. Obama would be the tougher candidate in the fall — oh really? Then why would the corporate owned media being beating the drum so loudly for Hillary to get out and keep hitting her with everything they’ve got and fawning over him for no good reason?
Gee, could the real reason be that they knowe SHE is more formidable so they play divide and conquer to get her out first — knowing the repubs. have all this stuff waiting in a vault — ready to go when they need it.
Senator Obama should have been more prudent in all his assocations (so much for the sterling judgment he claims to have) if he planned run for president. He is not running for president of far left-wing extremist America — he is running to be President of all America — most of whom live more in the center and have big problems with his associations with the divisive Rev. Wright, the crook Antonin Rezko and Ayers.
Are there any more? Can we please let America know now — before PA or any other states vote so we can save this situation.
Posted by: annagain | April 11, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
As an Obama supporter, I think this is all fair game. No one that walks this Earth is perfect. Franky, I am getting tired of all this “connected to”, “linked to”, “relationship with” or “rode the same train with” lunacy. Get me some hard evidence or drop it, I say. Ever hear of the theory that everybody in the world is connected to someone else by no more than 6 people? Google it. The theory is sound. Me, I happen to know someone who knows someone that went to school with Hillary Clinton. That’s 3 people. Lets not forget that Bill Clinton, as President gave a Pardon to these people.
As to the question of electability, John McCain has had some questionable rrelationships himself. Ross Perot actually has some wild theories about McCain’s heroism. Clinton also has some things she might have to answer for, like that mysterious murder that her and Maggie Williams, her new campaign manager, may have had something to do with while Billy Boy was President.
I personally think all of this stuff is hhogwash and shouldn’t even be news. Obama is a liberal. We all know that. So is Clinton. Let’s get pass these types of smears.
Posted by: Democrats United | April 11, 2008, 4:02 am 4:02 am
As the organizer behind Dr. Ayers’s recent visit to North Dakota let me say that the latest version of the smear campaign using video footage taken by the young republican group in the audience is just as dishonest as the supposed quote that Ayers has no regrets of the past “taken” from the NYT. IN FACT — Ayers discussed that misquote that night in some detail and explained what he really said, which was not that he had no regrets. Moreover, his message (which he iterated at UND as well) was that he was asked “Do you have any regrets?” and his position was “I’m 63 years old — I have LOT’S of regrets. You don’t get to be my age without many regrets.” He then went on to say that while his political stance has become more nuanced than in his youth, one has to understand what he did then in its historical context — which was that some 2000 young men were dying each week in the name of a war founded on a Big Lie. All this of course was edited out of the Fox News/Karl Rove interview. It’s also missing from this ABC news piece as well as almost every piece of coverage that I’ve seen on this issue. Lastly, it should be pointed out that Ayers did not endorse Obama at UND or any other candidate. He does admit that they live essentially on the same block, but he points out that he lives on the same block (in the other direction) as Louis Farrakhan too. This doesn’t make them close or neighborly.
Posted by: Richard Kahn | April 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
We all need to realize that NONE of the candidates are perfect. But I’m taking my chances with the crazy pastor. McCain’s about to be SWIFTBOATED by Vietnam Vets and Hillary, well there’s enough fodder on her to last for 8 years. John McCain is only running because he wants war. He can’t even remember who we’re fighting most of the time. Who wants a President like that? McCain’s an inch deep and a mile wide. He knows nothing about anything but war. Vietnam Vets won’t support him. They’ll shred him to bits! He blocked legislation find find more POWs and MIA in the 1990s. It’ll come back to bite him major!
Posted by: Kim | April 11, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
What he really meant to say was, “just say no to bombs”. It was all just youthful indiscretion.
Posted by: Mack | April 11, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
I am very angry by the way Obama talked about the people in the midwest its very disturbing to me! First of all, to clump small town people or any group of people together shows that he has no knowledge about us. For Obama to say that the people in small midwest towns are bitter shows his bias against us!
I am very proud to “cling to my religion” and he should be honest enough to tell us the truth about his church and his religion… He wants to be president of the USA and the church he regularly attends is dedicated to Africa… no whites allowed. And for him to talk against people who want to secure our country against illegal immigration is very disturbing to me, because securing our borders is not a bad thing! For him to be against people who have anti-trade sentiment is very telling, because he claims to want to help build our business up and for us not to want to see more trade deals that would cost more US jobs to go over seas is not a bad thing either! His speech clearly shows his racist bias towards midwesterners and those who are not as liberal as he is! He is talking as if he looks down on us and that is unforgiveable for a man who wants to be our president!
Posted by: Bevsh | April 13, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
I am from Chicago, and to all of you fools out there, Bill Ayers has done wonders with his programs on School Reform. In Fact, he has worked with that noted radical Mayor Daley. The Foundation in question, The Woods, works with kids and Health Care. I know that Health Care for kids, The CHIPS Program, is something you right-wingers can’t get behind, let the little buggers die, but Ayers is a friendly open man who has more than made up for any past wrongs. In fact, I find it disgusting that you people never mention the horror of the Vietnam War. Ayers is a much finer person than any of you guys.
Posted by: Denis Mueller | May 4, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
38 Years ago the US was in the early stages of metastasizing from the innocence of the 50′s to the Military/Industrial Juggernaut of today.
Parenthood changes people over time. I am not the person I was in 1970, thank goodness. Life evolves, maturity ripens and all in all, I will drive my 1976 motorcycle to the to the Election Booth in Novemeber, weather permitting. What ever happened to the YIP ?
Posted by: jay furman | October 6, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
CNN can’t compare Obama’s past with McCain’s past. We know NOTHING about Obama, OBAMA DOES NOT HAVE A TRACK RECORD. There fore people are comparing apples to oranges when it comes to THE candidate’s PASTS!
McCain has already proven himself, and yes he has made mistakes. BUT – OBAMA HAS NOT PROVEN himself – therefore his association with Ayres is MORE IMPORTANT than any of Mccain’s past associations. CNN just reported 10/06/08 on the Rick Sanchez Show, that Ayres did not start Obama’s campaign. It depends upon which campaign you are talking about. AYRES LAUNCHED HIS WHOLE ENTIRE POLITICAL CAREER, in Chicago, he held his very first fund raiser at his house. The Sun Times is prejudiced for the democratic party and everybody HERE knows that – sourcing them is biased. They are twisting words around to make it look good for Obama.
Posted by: Sue Baxter | October 6, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
This should have been out in the open months ago. It was all there, I read it, tried my best to post and got knocked down each time. Follow the money, connect the dots and it will show that Ayres is only one of many radicals that Obama is connected to. I have great fear for this country under his rule. If there is proof that I am wrong, someone please show me. I’m sick and tired of everytime “questions” arise about Obama’s past, right away you hear “people don’t want to hear about these things, they want to hear about the issues”. Of course we’re concerned about issues, but the integrity of this man and exactly where he intends to take this country is a huge concern. I beg you all, keep searching, make up your own minds!
Posted by: jg | October 7, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Brilliant Obama strategist Axelrod said that Obama and Ayres’ children went to school together. He said that was how they knew each other.
Posted by: Clif | October 7, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
More incredibly self-contradicting crap!
Posted by: Shawn Malloy | October 7, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
This doesn’t even address the Annenberg issue which is appearing to be entirely scandalous. Why won’t ABC (or the others) approach that issue?
Posted by: John | October 9, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
You small town people keep asking people to make up their own minds? OK, I made mine up, I’m voting for Obama. What do you have to say to that? What name will you call me? Who’s influence am I giving into?
If you are “scared” of what Obama will do, you are predjudice. You feel unsafe with a non-white at the helm. Ten to one odds say your parents used to say racist stuff when you grew up. And you want Obama supporters to “think for themselves”?
You middle American people have no perspective, you think all of America is like you, and those that are different are to be feared. Oldest story in the book, wake up and stop telling us rational people to “think”.
Posted by: TradeMark310 | October 9, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Ayers will most likely have a lot to do with Obama’s decision making if he becomes President. I fear that if Obama is elected as our leader, we will become a Third world country by the time he is out of Office. I’m supposed to clap now that he wears the American Flag pin, right?
Posted by: Janet | October 9, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
I was told as a young boy: That in order to talk about someone else’s house being dirty, make sure yours is clean. McCain and Palin need to check themselves out before they sling mud at Obama. We do not live in a perfect world, and we ourselves are not perfect. Both Mccain and Palin have so much dirty laundry in their closets, shovels wouldn’t clean it out you will need a back hoe. I have heard Obama talk about things he has done in the past that he is not proud of; what hs McCain denounced from his past. The bottom line is that negative connotations serve no useful purpose; how you deal with present matter is what is important. Each week I pray that both McCain and Obama be granted the wisdom to use their intellect and influence to straighten out what has been going wrong in the past eight years.
Charles E. D.
Posted by: Charles | October 9, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Here is the fact check from CNN:
The McCain campaign did not respond Saturday to a request for elaboration on Palin’s use of the plural “terrorists.”
Verdict: False. There is no indication that Ayers and Obama are now “palling around,” or that they have had an ongoing relationship in the past three years. Also, there is nothing to suggest that Ayers is now involved in terrorist activity or that other Obama associates are.
_______________________________________
False: Can we get on to issues of substance now. Please republicans stop weaseling out of debate on the real issues Americans care about like the economy, the occupation, health, education for our kids etc… What’s that John is proposing $300 billion dollar bailout to the mortgage industry that conservatives hate and liberals see right through? Anything else???
Posted by: HopingForABetterWorld | October 10, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Obama and his people keep avoiding the truth. They accuse McCain of supporting Keating, but Keating was not trying to blow up government buildings or kill people. One comment by trademark310 stated he was voting for Obama and what do we think of that? Well, I think that makes him a radical hugger as well! Obama states he was only 2 yaers old when Ayres was doing his thing, well I was a small child during WW2, but I did not grow up wanting to be friends with Nazi’s. Obama could have resigned when he found out, but he didn’t, did he?
Posted by: voicofrsn | October 10, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Posted by: voicofrsn
Obama and his people keep avoiding the truth.
You are absolutely delusional. Don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story.
________________________________________
The McCain campaign did not respond Saturday to a request for elaboration on Palin’s use of the plural “terrorists.”
Verdict: False. There is no indication that Ayers and Obama are now “palling around,” or that they have had an ongoing relationship in the past three years. Also, there is nothing to suggest that Ayers is now involved in terrorist activity or that other Obama associates are.
_______________________________________
Keep trying to distract and throw mud in your opponent’s eye. Especially when you look at the slime that you are trying to defend. Your parties candidate is a loser and the only way you can defend him is to attack the other guy. After all its the republican way.
Posted by: HopingForABetterWorld | October 10, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Good grief> Obama says that he “picks his friends carefully.” He’s either a liar or a fool. In fact, he’s clearly both.
All I want to know is why Ayers and his delightful little wife, Bernadine, aren’t awaiting an Obama presidency so he can pardon them and get them out of prison instead of being professors at otherwise prestigious institutions. These two are murderers.
Obama doesn’t just “pal around”, he works hand in glove with and accepts money and support from Ayers.
I wouldn’t say that Obama has bad judgement. Heck, he hangs around with people whose ideas and proclivities and hopes for change are the same as his own. THAT’S what bothers me about Obama.
Posted by: Noah Vaile | October 10, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
I did some research…Obama and Ayres go back 20 years. Michelle went to work for a law firm where Bernadine Dohrn(Ayres wife) worked and Dohrn was her contempory!!!This was back in the 1980′s….Obama was appointed by Ayres to be the executive chairman of the board of the group “Chicago Annenberg Challenge” to distribute $50 million for education which Obama gave to radical groups like ACORN. Acorn is now being investigated by the FBI for voter fraud. Obama started off by training the people who work there and was also their attorney before he ran for office. Obama’s campaign also donated several hundred thousand to this organization all over America. Guess where all of this voter fraud is happening? All swing states….No concerns for associations??? So much info to report and no room to write….
Posted by: C. Johnson | October 10, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
I don’t have any objections to freedom of speech and free thinkers. That is part of what makes this country what it is. What I hate about our society is the fact that people do not educate themselves about what is truly going on (as best we can) and are so close minded. Our society is screwed up not only in part because of our leadership but because of the narrow minded thinking of people today. Of hateful people who refuse to take a step back from what they’ve been told their whole life and think about a different perspective. Everyone can have an opinion and a belief. If you are not capable of having a respectful discussion and taking a walk in someone else’s shoes just to try and broaden your intellectual capacity then I believe you are a part of what makes this country full of hate with an inability to move forward. Look at the people who treated the Dixie Chicks the way they did when they spoke out about Bush. Now the majority of us are saying the same thing about him. They went as far as to make death threats to those women. How incongruent is that thought process!! People in this country don’t think before they act or speak. Have your thoughts and feelings about what people say or do but to extend hateful acts says a lot about your character. Have a little self respect and respect for human life.
Posted by: Dana | October 11, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Good Grief! The Dixie Chicks?? That is a group full of disrespect who uses their celebrity status as a means to degrade the USA! Even when Clinton was in office and did those deplorable things in the Oval Office, I gave him respect because he was our President, Our Commander in Chief. Anyone who would take on such a huge task for so little money shouldn’t be critized until you have walked in his or her shoes… I believe the hatred all started with the Dixie Chicks!! And that saddens me because I was one of their biggest fans. You’re better off to keep your mouth shut and let people think you’re stupid then to open it and remove all doubt!!!
Posted by: cccajjj | October 12, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Does it really matter which party? I mean really. Clinton, whom posed as a democrat in order to become elected as the nominee for that party and later won the election under those pretenses, spreading his republican ways while posed as a democrat. History is full of these instances. It is a fact that no one is swayed 100% in any direction, there will always be some points that we whom hold party ownership see differently than those whom we elect to speak on our behalf.
The bottom line is that their will always be points we do not see eye to eye on but as I listen to the bickering and name calling and unbecoming behaviors I can not help to think about a time not so long ago when there was black listing.
So I am curious to know if all of this propaganda has a point. Propaganda in the fact that even though these things may be true, I do not see much rebuttal.
During the Senator Joe McCarthy era, with all of his right winged thoughts leading him in the direction that he thought was right. We forget the controversy that followed him and the outcome of him being removed from the Committee of Unamerican Behavior as well as him being publicly reprimanded.
This leads me to try to remember a time where Nixon got the choice to resign as president because of Watergate. A very famous scandal that had to do with parties drudging info up on opponents.
This has got to stop. It get to a point where one want to hear about what a candidate is going to bring to the table rather than the short comings of the opponent they are running against. Tell me what you are going to do to change my life not what you feel your opponent is lacking and how this person does not measure up.
I feel that this is not new politics, such as we are suposed to believe it is. We are not ready to turn a new page, and we are not ready to practice new politics.
McCain is wanting us to believe that things are going to change, that he is not like all those stuffy old politicians of the past yet he is reverting to the old ways of doing business, with all of his smear tactics.
So whom are we suposed to believe some one that is open about the things they have done or someone trying to deceive us and scare us. The current republican camp is becomeing more conservative as time passes this is just the era we are in. I think that if McCain is a strong enough candidate then why does he need to win pointing out the pitfalls of Obama. Why spend so much time and effort on pointing out all the ways he does not measure up.
Obama is everything we as the majority of the people can relate to. He has faced many issues that those of us “whom are middle class and low income” are facing right now. No experience is what the other party is claiming, but how can this be when he has fought through oppression, low income, ailing family, minority. All of these statuses in which the majority of us are facing. I think first hand knowledge of knowing what it takes to transcend above and beyond stereotypes and become a better person not because of money but from character. That is what we need.
I just think that even after 100′s of years of wanting equality we as Americans are not ready for that. No matter how hard we fight it will always come down to pointing out each others differences. Lets try electing on each others merits. Rather than turning a blind eye to scare tactics and claiming that is just the way we do business. Accountability is a major factor and from where I see it Obama has corrected issues of concern as well as been very open to explaining his “less desirable behaviors.” While McCain has continued to ambush him with more, never taking accountability for his grade school bully antics.
As far as the experience thing goes, no one except those that have been in that position of president has the experience. America does not want experience, because if they do they would have nominated Clinton, She was the only one with experience of the presidency.
And as for the Dixie Chicks or anyone else that chooses to express their opinion, whether or not others agree… is that not what America is all about, the freedom to express. As a matter of fact that is what the campaign is based on freedom of expression, freedom of speech, or does that have a limit as well?
This is just one persons opinion, whose tiered of all the negative tactic. To embrace true change one must be willing to stand up against the social flow of things and do what is right, not continue the same way of doing business. Lets write in Al Gore!
Posted by: Lisa | October 12, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Lisa, You said Obama has faced many issues that those of us whom are middle class and low income are facing and that he as fought through oppression, low income,ailing family, minority. Well, I have been poor and too, upper middle class, and myself, husband or not one of our 4 now grown children(all who have high paying jobs now) were ever able to go to the finest schools that Obama has gone to. Where in the heck did he get the money?? Never heard if it came from grants or scholorships and he himself said he wasted time doing cocaine and not caring to do anything when he was in high school so you can imagine his grades upon graduating, so that would mean no scholorships, or grants and shouldn’t have been let in from merit so explain, how does this education work?? My boys who are now engineers, one a chemical and the other electrical(who got his masters from UCLA in just one year)worked their behinds off, never got into prestigious schools as Obama who was a goof…Too many unaswered questions about him, sorry, and that has nothing to do with the fact that he is black..I do not object to a black man being our president, he just has to be the one that is deserving. Why not Colin Powell? He would have my vote tomorrow!!! Obama has no experience..He only served in the Senate a year before he was on the campaign trail for president… Catering to leftwing radical groups do not make you good presidential material. Check out Acorn and all his ties to this group who is now being investigated by the FBI and how much money his campaign has donated to this group that has been committing voter fraud and just so happens in mainly the swing vote states. I know alot of people say you shouldn’t judge someone by association with others but hey, there are too many in his life that have turned out to be America haters(Bill Ayres who is a domestic terrorist and not 20 years ago, as late as 2006 standing on the flag on the cover of Time magazine), Reverend Wright (G–Damn America and his hatrd for white people! Would that be racist?), Farhacan,(don’t even know and don’t care that I can’t spell his name correctly, who call Obama the next Mesiah)Rezko(dirty realestate deals),and the priest who spews hatred once again towards America. SCAREY
Posted by: C. Johnson | October 13, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
You don’t need to be a weatherman to know about the weather.
Posted by: reese | October 13, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Mr. Mueller, Ayers probably is friendly but not open or he would step forward and fess us to his wrong doing. He injured serveral people when he bombed the Capitol, Pentagon and the NY Police Dept. He is an unrepentant domestic terrorist that never apologized for his actions, only said he was sorry he didn’t do more. Stood on the American Flag in 2006 on the front of Time Magazine. And yes you are right about the Vietnam War, it was horror. Horror that John McCain had had every bone in his body broken to protect our freedom back home!! Yeah, The freedom of speech you just had, bad mouthing him, he paid the price for you to have it!!! And please, The Woods Organiztion funnels money to Acorn and they are both supposed to be a non partisan group which support Obama and some of our tax dollars go into those groups and so they should be non partisan. But, why wouldn’t they support Obama? The Obama camp only donated $800,000.00 to Project Vote which is affiliated with ACORN who is now being investigated by the FBI for voter fraud. Obama’s association is a problem but it’s the participation with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko, Flager, Acorn, Do you see a pattern here????? That is called POOR JUDGEMENT and when he makes excuses or lies about his connections, which he has, that is called CAN’T TRUST!
Posted by: C. Johnson | October 15, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am
TradeMark 310, You don’t sound to rational..I am not a small town person and I have done my research. Black or white has nothing to do with this election. I know each candidates proposals and I happen to think that big governmnet isn’t the way for people to reach the American dream. Universal health care is scarey too(more government intervention and means more taxes). Did you know that 40% of the people DO NOT pay taxes? Obama wants to tax the people who supply the jobs to the other 55%. Every middle class person strives to be in than upper 5% but won’t get there if the rich take there businesses out of the country because they won’t let the government take 50% of their hard earned dollars. If they do stay, they will have to hire less employees because they can’t afford salaries. Less jobs create a bad economy and so on and so on..Get the picture? I also care that when I did the research, I found that it wasn’t just the ASSOCIATION that Obama had with the radicals(Rev. Wright, Ayres, Rezko, Flager, Rashid Khalidi, and yes it is all true, check it out)it was the PARTICIPATION with all….You need to be informed and that can be done by getting the facts yourself. Don’t read blogs and biased material, get the facts…..
Posted by: Ann | October 16, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
HopingForABetterWorld said: False: Can we get on to issues of substance now. Please republicans stop weaseling out of debate on the real issues Americans care about like the economy, the occupation, health, education for our kids etc… What’s that John is proposing $300 billion dollar bailout to the mortgage industry that conservatives hate and liberals see right through? Anything else???
Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid today, asked for another 300 billion goodie bag. The 300 billion Mr.McCain proposed, would come from the 700 billion already allocated, a few weeks ago. Mr.McCain also stated that he would rather see it for mortgages, then to the big boys in the big corporations.
I agree….this whole bail out isn’t good….but we must remember, if we blame Bush for this…more Democrats signed onto it, then did Republicans. Why? We also need to keep in mind…Obama signed on, as well as McCain.
Posted by: Jeanie | October 16, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
May 4th to Oct.6th is a long time without a comment!!!And so many on April 10th……..
Posted by: someone searching | October 21, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
The character of the person is no longer important ot the Americans. There are pieces to a puzzle, and Obama’s story…quite a bit are missing. Months ago, as I was doing my homework, mapping things out, who the candidates are…WHO THEY ARE…I did not, and still cannot find pieces to the puzzle who Obama is. In my opinion, for years, these certain group of people (who do not like or care about USA), groomed Obama to get in the oval office, so they can ease their way in destroying the United States of America inch by inch. Honestly, how was he able to finance himself through college, then Harvard? without student loans? How can someone very new in the political arena, for 4 yrs, and last 2 spent campaigning for a presidential seat? Candidates are required to disclose contributors to their campaign, Obama didn’t turned in half of it. How did he get away with this? Who’s responsible for allowing this to happen? Money talks, and I believe quite a few took the risk to the road of corruption..or is there something out there already ‘REALLY BIG” that these people are forced to comply. SCARY…VERY SCARY! With this note, I stand brave, and I would like to be proven wrong…so, if there folks out there, common folks like myself, if you have found the missing pieces to the puzzle…prove me wrong.
Posted by: Terry | November 14, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am