By Jennifer Parker

Apr 1, 2008 4:33pm

Super-D Update

Hillary Clinton consigliere Harold Ickes says that of course Rev. Wright is coming up in his conversations with Superdelegates.

In an interview with Talking Points Memo Ickes said, "Super delegates have to take into account the strengths and weakness of both candidates and decide who would make the strongest candidate against what will undoubtedly be ferocious Republican attacks. I’ve had super delegates tell me that the Wright issue is a real issue for them….

"Nobody thinks that Barack Obama harbors those thoughts. But that’s not the issue. The issue is what Republicans [will do with them]…I think they’re going to give him a very tough time."

**

Enigmatic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., says he digs the call to have super-Ds make their intentions publicly known by July 1.

Speaking to reporters, Reid said — as Roll Call reports — "I like that — July 1 or before."

And what would he do to encourage the plan, Reid said, “I just did it.”

**

Meanwhile, everybody’s favorite doctor, Howard Dean, told USA Today that he does NOT dig the idea of a superdelegate convention.

"We can’t have a convention of super delegates because it would look like 330 delegates are overriding the wishes of 30 million voters," Dean said of a plan floated by Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen.

"It’s good that he’s talking about it because it focuses the attention of the unpledged delegates on the need to put their country and their party first by making up their mind before the convention."

**

The Republican National Committee is having quite a lot of fun with this Super-D stuff.

- jpt

User Comments

Harry Reid has the spine of a jellyfish. He has yet to craft a way to stand up to the repugnant policies of the current administration, even though he leads a majority. If he thinks we’re going to listen to a call to disenfranchise Florida and Michigan he better forget. We will take to the streets of Denver before that happens.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

It will come up again and again. I can see a 527 commercial with the Rev. Wright’s greatest hits. The MSM has done their best to suppress this and smooth it over. It will sink him.

Posted by: Tina D | April 1, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

As a lifelong democrat, I hope all democrates will join me in hoping we get rid of Howard Dean.as Chair of the DNC-we never had any of this mess when terry Mcc. was the chairman. It is so clear dean is a obama supporter. and he has ruined the Dem. party. It is said that many have reg. as a dem. but because of fl and michigan, and his clear stacking the cards against hillary
they will lose many dems. I will not vote for obama in nov. and I know many others who will not either. simply because of dean and co. and the far left of the party. ramming obama down our throat.
lets vote NO to Howard Dean as party chair.
NO to DEAN!
Heyhey, hoho, Howard Dean has got to go!
yeehi!

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

There are two types of Superdelegates.
Accountable Supers are elected officials who eventually have to face the voters during a re-election.
Unaccountable Supers. These are mainly party insiders, fat cats, loylists and other assorted apparatchiks.
Hillary’s lead in Superdelegates comes from the Unaccountable Superdelegates.
The elected folks are trendin toward Mr. O, Big Time as of late. Writings on the wall for Hills.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 1, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Get Rid of Dean?!??!?
What are you thinking. The Kos Kids love the dude. It’ll be a fight, Man.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 1, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

AL Gore Rumor on April Fools Day…..hm.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 1, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

By any means if necessary. That’s the moto of the Tuzla GI-Jane, now Rocky Balboa.
By the way, after listening the HRC make the Rocky analogy, it is hard to believe that she misspoke last week about her trip to Bosnia. She seems obsessed with action movie heroes. So it is rather natural that at one point, she believes that she is one of them.

Posted by: Lance D. | April 1, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Tina D, the MSM played the Rev. Wright clips non-stop for 3 whole weeks. They brought every talking head to give their opinion, interviewed idiotic church members, ransacked through church writings, and you dare claim that they suppressed it? Fox News is still running this issue 24/7. How can you say it hasn’t gotten adequate coverage? The truth is that most Americans see this thing for what it is: A non-issue. Yes, Rev. Wright said crazy things, but he committed no crime, and more importantly, Obama is no Rev. Wright. Bill Clinton cheats on his wife, but Hillary is not Bill. People are not judged in this country by association. Not by other reasonable people. Those that will not vote for Obama because of Wright would not have voted for him regardless.

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Bosnia-gate will sink the Clintons. All the Republicans have to do is show their lies and bring up the latest one…BOSNIA-GATE. This will reinforce peoples feelings about the Clintons, They will lie and lie and the American people will have to spend 70 million to determine what the meaning of “is” is. Only this time we will have to spend 120+ million (taking into account inflation).

Posted by: Karen | April 1, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

WestCoastMessanger is organizing the revolt. Look at what is happening in Zimbabwe, rules and regualtions were respected through the voting process and Zimbabwe is turning the page to old politics, top down approaches, Mugabe is going on exile. That is what it takes in democracy. Remember also that Rev Wright was warmly welcome in a Catholic Church in Chicago last week. Is that not telling you something at all? Rev Wright is not Obama and Obama is not Rev Wright. Obama can fight against the republican machinery as he has done against the Clinton’s and win. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA/WEBB

Posted by: BKMC | April 1, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Go for it Gore,time you wised up

Posted by: honest | April 1, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

BKMC – Don’t be messin with Westie. He’s gotta couple delete keys and he ain’t afraid to use them.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 1, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

The power of party elites, aka super delegates and the DNC, to manipulate the outcome of an election is disturbing. Mr. McCain is looking better and better.

Posted by: texasdemocrat | April 1, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Take a look at the polls: Rev. Wright had zero, zero, zero effect on Obama amongst Independents and Democrats. People see very clearly that Obama is not like Wright. And hard as the Republicans come after him with Wright, this election will be decided on the issues, not some silly political games. Obama’s fate will be decided by two things: Iraq and the economy. If both things improve significantly, it damages Obama’s chances and increases the significance of periphery issues like Wright. If this economy is mired in a significant recession in November, even a picture of Obama having sex with a little boy will not be enough to save the Republicans. Even the most adamant critics agree that Obama is not racist and neither is Rev. Wright, I must add.

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Jim Turney, Meeks is a superdelegate and a Illinois State Senator. So now Obama has to be accountable for his fellow politicians as well? So McCain has to be accountable for Trent Lott and the Idaho Senator and all the other crazies in office on the Hill.
William Ayers is a Univercity of Chicago Professor. Since Obama taught there it is very likely he knows him…so what. If the man is a criminal then he should be in jail, not teaching at the Univercity of Chicago.
Sen. Obama, does not have to be held to a different standard then any other person. He is not responsible for everyone walking the Earth, this is racism as I see it.
This is what black people are talking about. It’s not enough that a Black student gets and A+ in order to be considered equal, they have to get an A++++ to be equal with the white B- white student. This white middle aged woman is tired of the double standard and I will be voting for Obama.

Posted by: Karen | April 1, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Tina D,
You got that “wright”. The 527s will have voice overs, inserting the name of each super D that jumped in the hopper with Obama after the Wright scandal came to public. It may not hurt Obama but any Super D congressman/woman running for re-election will pay the price. You notice the only senator to jump on board is the one that is not up for re-election for four years, she figures the dust will be settled by then.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

so its …
a Obama who distanced from his pastor’s derogatory remarks
vs
a Hillary, one of the biggest straight face pathological liers ever ( sniper fire – not onw, not tow, not three, but 4 pinnochios — washington post)
Ouch….that makes Ickes look like either a an oxymoron or “morally bankcrupt” for making an argument for Hillary based on the above comparision.

Posted by: moeen | April 1, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Of course Obama will use any means to get elected. Heck he took a hate American statement, and made it ok, when he turned around and took the eyes of the country off that and came back on America for being angry over someone spewing hate for their country, and called you all racist.
Obama has to win, the black community have put out to much money for him not to. They will resort and stoop to anything and any level to achieve this.
He has a purpose he must full fill for the black community.
Shame the cost for the rest will be this country, we know and love.
A vote for America is a vote against Obama.

Posted by: seah | April 1, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

when the republicans fully expose obama’ mother and her marxist politics
and voters connect his young life teachings with marxism and his adult life teachings with black seperatist church. you get a clearer picture of who obama must be in his core. no matter what he stands up and tells his supporters.
I do not believe you can have that kind of background and come out a uniter of the people of the united states.
I wonder how he views this unity will play out over the next four years of his presidency-and I wonder how his supporters are going to feel?
I do believe the people of pa will correct this wrong. that is being done.
also-
If we just think about it when it comes to the ge in nov.
Hillary’s bosnia story we can weather because it really is not as bad as the
obama wright-marxist mother’s story that is going to be fully be revealed by the rep.
The disservice is be put over by the media on the people who continue to blindly support him now-is the sad thing.
You heard it here from me-mark it
if obama gets the nomination the dems
will not win the white house.
can you see john mccain story up against obama checkered history-that the media (just out of spite for Hillary) are suppressing.
can you see it
John Mccain war hero-pow
and his family millitary history
up against obama’
marxist mother and these che’ like people.
Just remember when we get to the general election-who helped us get there
dean and co.
please voters do not put
obama up against mccain-if you truly want to end the war going on in iraq.

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Moeen,
I love it. Barack the Empty Suit Obama DISTANCED himself from his pastor now did he. Let’s see, 1) he recognizes that Wright is not suitable to represent his campaign, so what does he do, 2) he appoints Wright to his campaign, then 3) a year later, the press decides, oh, we’ve been giving him an easy ride, they turn over a leaf and find hate speaking Wright, so 4) Obama leaps into speedy action and removes Wright from his campaign.
Hmmm, I wonder how he’s going to handle a nuclear crisis, will he wait for the press’s pronouncements?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Bosnia event is the proof that Hillary is one of biggest straight faced liers ever….
And if you compare her lies to that of Bill’s you can see they are perfect match for each other.
So voting for Hillary would mean voting for a package/team of biggest combination of liers.

Posted by: afroza | April 1, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

BKMC,
Don’t even bring up the removal of Mugabe as a model of democracy. He’s been committing genocide for the last decade and has been unchecked by the civilized world. He’s also one of those conspiracy wingnuts that believe the U.S. government was manipulating the weather to cause African doubt. He sounds suspiciously to have developed from the same line of thinking as the Reverend Wright.
Why didn’t a single black leader speak up against Mugabe through his reign of terror, even if the white cowards would not?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

there are many democrats that do consider WRIGHT’s word hateful. Now the question is judgement on Obamas part. I would never ever consider Wright as a mentor, someone to preach the gospel to my children and not have the same ideals. I don’t give a rats patootie all the good Wright has done, one bad comment of hate is bad, more that one is pure disqust. Plus Obama is a proven liar just on this one issue, he is raw meat and the republicans know they can tear him apart. It will be interesting to see Dean spin all this, he’s a idiot.

Posted by: D | April 1, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

WOW “JGAW” Your words are so venomous towards Howard Dean…. At any rate, the fact that the Clintons are not conformists to the rules of any does not mean that Dean is an Obama supporter.
Dean is merely trying to remain neutral in that the rules were clear before the primaries and the caucuses–Florida and Michigan moved up their primaries dates, and as such knew ahead of time that they would suffer penalties.
For being a man and not backing down, I admire Dean for sticking to the rules. All of flip-flopping and whining from Hillary has really placed the Democratic party in a bad light.
How much respect could the Democratic party maintain, if Dean were to bend at every whim? The candidates and the State-level Democratic parties of both Florida and Michigan knew up front about the sanctions for holding their primary/caucus elections early.
So what is the deal here? Hillary knew–signed the agreement: Obama knew–signed the agreement.
Obama and Dean are committed to play by the rules established upfront–that to me is the essence of integrity.
I am just not certain why some are allowing Hillary to confuse the issues?
All of this emotional whining is really not necessary. I think she should jsut stand up and be the woman she wants us to think she is.

Posted by: Babysister | April 1, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

If it was very safe in Bosnia, why were the soldiers in full combat gear? I drive by a recruiting office everyday and I’ve never seen anyone in the office walking around in combat gear.Mac

Posted by: Mack | April 1, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Just remember-on the wright thing
if he gets the nomination and goes against mccain
the rep. the press who are supporting him now-will not be able to ignore reporting more about it because the rep. press is going to milk what they have add some and expose a lot more.
obama will be forced to do something more to seperate himself more from wright. but you know what the only thing that will be left for him to do is completely denounce wright and remove himself from that church.
when he does that-he will lose the black vote.
Many black people have and are already saying-if he moves his membership from that church-he will lose their support.
if we nominate obama for president against john mccain we will be helping the rep. create the “perfect storm”
for defeating the dems
keeping the white house
and the war goes on.
no to obama for dem nomination
out goes dean

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

WestCoastMessenger,
Each candidate has problem with their surrogates: Obama with his pastor, McCain with his pastor Haggie (for calling Catholics curch ?hore), and Hillary with her brother earning 100s of thousand for having Bill Clinton free a felon.
But, none of the above compares to straigt faced lies (4 pinnocios in one phrase) by, not surrogates, but the candidate hiself/herself.
And here is how Obam can handle a necular crisis: As he did when it came to decide agianst the Biggest US foreing policy blunder by reading he intelligence report, by his vision, and by his judgement….compare that to Hillary’s experience of imaginary snipar fires, idoit-like carelesness of not reading the intelligence report, and voting for the war using her ZERO judgement, ZEOR vision.

Posted by: moeen | April 1, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

you don’t count florida and michigan that means Obama steals the nomination and destroys the party.

Posted by: D | April 1, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

WestcoastMessenger you are making a mistake. The 527’s will not have the impact you think they will with this Wright issue because even the biggest fools in the world know that because Casey for example supported Obama after the Wright controversy, doesn’t mean he condones the specifics of those comments. I think the problem here is that Republicans have exaggerated the impact of this Rev Wright issue and are flabbergasted that it hasn’t had the desired effect on the Obama campaign. Definitely it has hurt the Obama campaign. But the fact is it hasn’t, and never will, hurt him where it matters (with his BASE). The truth is that most of Obama’s supporters think this country’s policies have been unjust to minorities and poor folks (white and black and blue and brown). They are the Bob Kennedy Democrats and in many ways, this Wright controversy helps Obama with those folks. For them this is not a campaign. It IS A MOVEMENT. Perhaps it is the biggest movement since our nation fought for its independence. A movement spurred by the audacity to reclaim a dream of absolute equality and justice for all. It goes beyond Obama. It’s an idea of that which has long escaped those that thrive for justice and felt hat finally, their time has come. A movement to right the wrongs of decades of abuse and neglect that led to things like Katrina and the desperate condition of minorities (especially blacks) in this country; the staggering rate of high school dropouts, HIV infection, incarceration, homelessness, and poverty. For this crowd, this injustice has only been crystallized by the disastrous policies of Bush and the damage he has done to our image abroad. But the irony is that Bush has opened an opportunity for this yearning to be emboldened. Without Bush, there would have been no Obama. Bush happens to be the antithesis of Obama. The opposite of the ideals he represents. So here is the new coalition: The college educated white liberals (who are the true engine and spirit that drives this campaign), the young (who are the force and purity of it), and blacks (who represent the cause). This coalition is determined to challenge the status quo. This movement has become so strong they are about to bring the mighty Clintons (who the Republicans never figured out a way to beat) to their knees. I travel often and I can tell you that for the first time in my lifetime, people HATE this country. A decade ago we were loved, worshiped, looked up to. Now we are scum. The Obama crowd wants to reclaim the dream of America, and although they do not verbalize their grievances with the same words that Wright used, they feel the same frustration and blame not white America, but the far Right America.

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

TCG,
I think the only relevant distinction between the supers are the ones that have to face election in the fall versus those that do not. Obama’s movement comes from those that do not.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Babysister (I love writing that)
Jamal (obama surrogate) and others who talk about the states broke the dem rules and should be punished fail to see the larger rule of all voters having their say. Now I do not know exactly how they are going to solve the fl, and michigan problem-but I know it must be solved-and we cannot go forward
without letting the voters from fl and michigan have their vote.
because if we do not-under the guise of punishing them now
they will help punish us in nov.

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

countallthevotes,
haha… the Order Sons of Italy…
I hope you remember that these same folks who led campaigns to get The Sopranos taken off of the air, and objected to actor Robert De Niro receiving honorary Italian citizenship, believing his roles to be negative stereotypes.
They are NUTS.

Posted by: Nicholson | April 1, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

A message for the Super Delegates. The republicans will have a hay day with all the shady characters Obama associates with as well as all the lies he has spewed to the people. Obama uses the same speaking tactics as the great con artists of history Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler. Obama’s friends and Super Delegates who have been charged with committing election finance crimes, Rezco, Gov Villa, Robert Feldman, his terrorist friends Ayers and Dorn and their supporters, his Islamic extremist friends Farakhan, Khalidi and Wright who are racist and hate America. These are just a few of Obama’s associates who are going to cause him a lot of trouble in the general election. These friends of Obama use the same types of negative emotional stories, lies, heal with great feel good stories and inspirational words cause people to believe the lies told to them as absolute truth. This is the same technique Obama uses in his speeches and ads: cause negative emotions with stories, lie and finally heal with powerful feel good inspirational words, quotes and stories. The result is the lie or lies are accepted as absolute truth. Birds of a feather flock together. The book, The Secret endorsed By Oprah. Says that like attracts like. This is the Law of Attraction. Gov. Vila of a Super Delegate and Robert Feldman of Philly PA have been arrested and charged with over 20 counts of election finance crimes. Feldman has been charged with illegally bundling donations for Vila who is a Super Delegate that supports Obama. Feldman has also bundled donations and raised money for US Senator Bob Casey a Supper Delegate who supports Obama. Gov. Vila went to Harvard Law School the same time as Obama. Both Obama and Villa are the same age. Birds of a feather flock together. Like attracts like. Another friend of Obama’s is Rezco also charged with election finance crimes. A pattern is developing here. Obama’s has friends who are racists, Marxists, terrorists, who hate America, who lie, who are Islamic extremists. Obama accepts votes and financial support from these friends, major corporations and industries. Again birds of a feather flock together. It is clear Obama is not morally or ethically worthy to be the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States of America. Plus Obama has lied so much, lacks the experience and know how to make real positive change that will be effective for all Americans. Vote for Hillary.

Posted by: Bob4USA | April 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

A message for the Super Delegates. The republicans will have a hay day with all the shady characters Obama associates with as well as all the lies he has spewed to the people. Obama uses the same speaking tactics as the great con artists of history Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler. Obama’s friends and Super Delegates who have been charged with committing election finance crimes, Rezco, Gov Villa, Robert Feldman, his terrorist friends Ayers and Dorn and their supporters, his Islamic extremist friends Farakhan, Khalidi and Wright who are racist and hate America. These are just a few of Obama’s associates who are going to cause him a lot of trouble in the general election. These friends of Obama use the same types of negative emotional stories, lies, heal with great feel good stories and inspirational words cause people to believe the lies told to them as absolute truth. This is the same technique Obama uses in his speeches and ads: cause negative emotions with stories, lie and finally heal with powerful feel good inspirational words, quotes and stories. The result is the lie or lies are accepted as absolute truth. Birds of a feather flock together. The book, The Secret endorsed By Oprah. Says that like attracts like. This is the Law of Attraction. Gov. Vila of a Super Delegate and Robert Feldman of Philly PA have been arrested and charged with over 20 counts of election finance crimes. Feldman has been charged with illegally bundling donations for Vila who is a Super Delegate that supports Obama. Feldman has also bundled donations and raised money for US Senator Bob Casey a Supper Delegate who supports Obama. Gov. Vila went to Harvard Law School the same time as Obama. Both Obama and Villa are the same age. Birds of a feather flock together. Like attracts like. Another friend of Obama’s is Rezco also charged with election finance crimes. A pattern is developing here. Obama’s has friends who are racists, Marxists, terrorists, who hate America, who lie, who are Islamic extremists. Obama accepts votes and financial support from these friends, major corporations and industries. Again birds of a feather flock together. It is clear Obama is not morally or ethically worthy to be the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States of America. Plus Obama has lied so much, lacks the experience and know how to make real positive change that will be effective for all Americans. Vote for Hillary.

Posted by: Bob4USA | April 1, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Hillarys state of New York would have crucified her if she didn’t agree to go to war. Elected by the people for the people. New York must have agreed with her decision to go to war, she won the primary there. Also, Obama is a coward, spinless weasel. He would have voted for the war if he had to vote. He has done just about everything the way the party goes. Its always a win win to say no to war without having to do it. Plus he has voted for it with everything associated with the war since being on the senate floor. If he had a spine he would have voted no to everything on the war.

Posted by: D | April 1, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Kevin,
You are trying to play the R’s as weak fools again, the same mistake that the D’s have been making the last 12 years. The Wright thing will get a whole new life. They will be more than happy to let it die down until about two weeks before the vote, at which time Obama will be powerless to defuse the carpet bombing 527 ads.
Bottom line: Obama made himself unelectable by his judgement, having placed Wright onto his campaign.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

For those who keep bringing up Clinton’s Bosnia embellishment, have you bothered to read a few of Senator Obama’s embellishments? I particularly love the one where he said his parents met at the Selma march and he was born after that, but his parents actually met and he was born way before that. There is also the Kennedy story, the professor story, the Rezko story, and who knows how many more. All politicians embellish, change, or deny facts and stories, that in itself is not going to keep me from voting for or against anyone. However, failure to convince me that you had a valid reason for sitting through sermons like Rev. Wright’s, and condone by staying, WILL stop me from voting. Say it doesn’t matter all you want, but to most hardworking Americans who do take patriotism seriously, it does matter what kind of people you associate with for 20 years if you are running for President of the United States. We are used to corruption and shady dealings in Illinois politics, but would like to stay away from that in picking a President. What irritates me even more is the hypocrisy; if McCain or Clinton had sat in a Methodist Church for 20 years and listened to the exact same type of thing, do you honestly think they would be getting off simply by giving one speech? And this IS NOT the same thing as the ramblings of Robertson and Falwell. Presidential candidates did not sit in their churches and listen to their insanity for 20 years. It’s the double standards and sense of entitlement that Obama’s campaign keeps throwing out that is really turning a lot of people off. That, plus the fact that the Democratic party just isn’t what it used to be, is why many absolutely will not ever vote for Obama, even if Sen. Clinton urges her supporters to do so. Also, contrary to what he said at the beginning of his campaign, he has indeed run the same kind of divisive campaign he has accused “the same ole Washington politicians” of over and over. I can forgive people their mistakes, but hyprocisy and underhanded and deliberately false tactics as have been used against the Clintons I do not find appealing in a Presidential candidate.

Posted by: dwc | April 1, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Babysister,
the agreement signed by Obama and Hillary Clinton is below. It is solely an agreement not to campaign in the states! They were even allowed, under the agreement, to fundraise in those states. Check for yourself.
THE AGREEMENT/PLEDGE:
… I _______________, Democratic Candidate for President, pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any state which schedules a presidential election primary or caucus before Feb. 5, 2008, except for the states of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina, as “campaigning” is defined by rules and regulations of the DNC.
Merritt thinks that the exclusion of the delegates is not commensurate with the scope of the pledge:
Now, can people stop saying that Hillary Clinton agreed the votes in Florida or Michigan wouldn’t count or to the non-seating of the delegates? It prohibited only campaigning. Even fundraising was allowed.
The exclusion of Michigan and Florida was a penalty imposed by the DNC. In my view, it was an unfair one and should be lifted. The votes should count as is, the delegates should be awarded and seated.

Posted by: countallthevotes | April 1, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Jgaw,
You got that right. The Obama zombies are perfectly happy to use pointy fingers and scream “they broke the rules, they broke the rules, make them pay!”. The zombies fail to realize that those same Democrats are going to remember how they were treated come November, except if Hillary is the nominee, because she is the only one to stand up for their participation.
Bottom line: Obama made himself unelectable by appointing Wright, by disenfranchising two major states, and by a display of pathetic bowling skills (ok I admit I threw that last one in because its April 1st).

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

To shed some more light on the hypocrisy of the Clinton campaign and Ickes in particular when it comes the SD’s role in the nomination process, let’s go back to early February and Ickes’ super invention of the term ‘automatic delegates’.
Ickes, at that time: “We’re no longer using the phrase super delegates. It creates a wrong impression. They’re called automatic delegates. Because that’s what they are.”
Haha.
The worry was that the phrase “super-delegates” implied that “they have super-powers or super influence when they don’t.” In other words, the phrase suggested that they have greater than average clout and that they have the power to overrule the democratic process, giving it the taint of back-room power politics.
Hahaha. Harold Ickes!

Posted by: Petra | April 1, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

The republican base has just not been mobilized because they figured dem primaries is not their battle to fight. But come GE, Wright’s words and Obama’s affilliation with him will come back and it will galvanize the conservatives and right-leaning independents. Add to that the disenfranchised and marginzalized democrats who will also be supporting anybody but Obama. Record turn out can be credited to Obama alright – all the anti-Obamas will come out to vote against him.

Posted by: echo | April 1, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Petra,
You are easily amused. What’s your point other than you are amused by nomenclature? Are you concerned that Harold Ickes participates in the game of positioning? I suppose you are going to argue that Axelrod is clean. Next thing you know you’ll tell me that Obama does not except money that came from oil companies or federal lobbyists.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Where were all the people currently worrying about FL and MI voting rights ~16 months ago when all the parties concerned decided they would be punished for moving their primaries? It wasn’t until Hillary fell way behind that we starting hearing about those poor souls whose votes won’t count. My father-in-law and daughter are among them and I dispise what their states did to them but changing the rules in the middle of the game is equally unjust and would send the wrong message in the future. This whole issue solidifies the fact that HRC is nothing more than a self-centered politician and a poor loser at that.

Posted by: Lou - Londonderry, NH | April 1, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Westcoastmesenger, I think you are prone to hyperboles. Unelectable because of Rev. Wright? Show me a political figure in American history devoid of one controversy and I’ll show you a flying donkey. This is silliness. There is nothing the Republicans will say in November that hasn’t been said. Everything about Wright has been said and if it would have sunk Obama, it would have sunk him now, in the middle of a very heated, very close campaign against a competitor with whom there are hardly any ideological differences. This campaign against Clinton is about personality since their ideas are pretty much mirror images of each other. Still he stands and each day, he grows stronger. You think recycled stories about Rev. Wright in November will suddenly make voters forget their values and vote for someone that doesn’t in any way represent their values? You must not really know much about politics my friend. Your memory serves you badly. Do some research. Compared to the baggage Clinton had in 1992, Obama is still looking like the Pope. The party with the most passion, ALWAYS wins in November!

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Is this the same Harold Ickes that strip fla. and Mich. delegates?
Superdelegates that support Hillary? Of course they say that they want to under mine Barack

Posted by: Lauepow | April 1, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

didn’t you hear Obama doesn’t take money from lobbyist(even though Hillarys website has listed his contributors) he gets them $10 at a time from his cult memebers, dang there are a lot of them.

Posted by: D | April 1, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Kevin,
Barack Obama quelled concerns with the Kos Mafia about his affiliation with Wright. However, the center of the party, those “typical white people” have plenty of concerns and his speech did not quell their questions, only increased them. Check out the writing of Mort Zuckerman, March 28th, in the U.S. News and World Report on the double standard presented by the Obama speech.
This story is still in a drip mode and it will continue to trickle out to voters going forward.
Why did ABC News present the scrubbing of the TUCC site in its coverage this week if the story is dead? It ain’t dead by a long shot and the corrosive effects are still in play. Obama shot himself in the foot on this one. He’s unelectable.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Hillary life story and political career are contained in that original sin of lying about her very own name. She’s a Hitchcock character; he could have invented her.
When in ’95 she met with Sir Edmund Hillary, the famous first conqueror of Mount Everest, she told him that her mother had named her after him. She had always told that story, to anyone, but nevet to the man itself.
For more than a decade, Sen. Clinton’s informal biography repeated the story, and it was recounted in former President Bill Clinton’s 2004 autobiography, “My Life.”
But – Sir Edmund and his Sherpa guide, Tenzing Norgay, became known to the world only in 1953, after becoming the first men to reach Everest’s summit.
Hillary ‘Pantsuit On Fire’ Clinton was born in 1947. At that time, Edmund Hillary was an unknown beekeeper.

Posted by: gretchen | April 1, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

NH Lou,
So are you one of those rocket scientists that say we should not resolve the Florida and Michigan issue, so that we successfully cut off the nose of the Democratic party to punish its face?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

The reason why all these superdelegates havent CAVED is because Obamas argument is BS to begin with.
The ONLY argument is that he has 53% of the delegates and 51% of the vote .
We all know he wont EXPAND that lead . He is only going to win 2 out of the last 10 states. Oregon and North Carolina.
You cant call 53% of the pledged delegates a HUGE win ?
obama and the corrupt media insist somehow that its the WILL OF THE PEOPLE with these numbers?
They make it sound like its 60/40 or 70/30 .
Obama LOSES every other argument. Experience. Pastor Wright, big state primaries.
i guarantee you they are SWEATING BULLETS to try to force Clinton out because they know Obama cannot conclusively make the case he is the clear nominee.
He didnt earn it.

Posted by: tomdavie | April 1, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I am suprised that some of the black community isn’t calling Obama an uncle tom after denouncing his pastor. Isn’t that usually the next thing we will hear from them? No, they are hoping and praying for a black man to be president, then they will call him an uncle tom when he sells out to kennedy and kerry and all those old white folk. trust me Obama owns them something.

Posted by: D | April 1, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Kevin,
I think you are so very wrong. If Obama becomes the Dem. nominee, he will a “dead man walking.”
Note, Hillary Clinton’s campaign was virtually silent on the Wright issue. Do you really think the Republicans will stand idly by and watch the presidency descend to Obama?
They are simply drooling over the chance to get at him. And, they know how to do it and will be “unabashedly” patriotic in their actions.
There are far more sermons out there, you know. The MSM only highlighted a few.
Take it to the bank.

Posted by: countallthevotes | April 1, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

gretchen: I am still wating for Obama to explain the lie he told about his racial awakening. You know the story that when he was 9yrs old that he read a article in Life magizine about a little black boy who had disfigured himself with chemical in order to lighten his skin! Great story but the only problem it was a lie!
The fact that he said that he never talked to Rezko about the house he purchased then said that yes he did talk to him and that he took him on tour of it.
That his parents meet at the Selma march. In fact he was born 4yrs before Selma.
That the Kennedys helped his father come to america. In fact as reported in the Washington Post this past weekend the Kennedy’s had nothing to do with his father coming to america.
So like Ricky Ricardo Says “he’s got some splain to do”!

Posted by: russell | April 1, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

National polls showed Obama was little damaged by Rev. Wright. National polls also show Hillary has nose dived since her “sniper” fire adventure. Her nose dive is even starting to show in PA.

Posted by: Nitwit | April 1, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Since Hillary dropped the word ‘un-American’ to characterize an Obama point of view during this campaign, this is MY favorite Hillary Clinton quote:
“I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe.”

Posted by: bernd | April 1, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Wright will not be a issue for the Super Delegates or the majority of the public in the general. Yes, 527 will run their ads, however it will not have the same impact in the fall and they have more on Hillary. Most people have made their decision regarding Wright and moved on to greater issues that face us. I think the Clinton campaign peddling this again is really sad, however they will loose their case because that is thinking tactical not strategic.

Posted by: leslie | April 1, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

If what came out of minister Wright’s mouth would make any body vote for a warmonger like McCain deserves to be drafted in his army to fight Iraq and Iran. These people definitly deserves the consequences of voting for Bush a third time. Fool me once shame on me ,fool me twice shame on me,fool me a third your the fool!

Posted by: MERLE7 | April 1, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Obama is unamerican if he doesn’t count all the votes all the states.

Posted by: D | April 1, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

leslie: That’s what John Kerry said! Don’t worry about those swiftboat ads the american people will never buy it! Look who is still Senator and not president! So I would not discount the Wright issue!

Posted by: russell | April 1, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

You gotta be kidding, the gop will crush obama with their wright ads this fall if he is the nom. those of you who think it will have no effect are deluding yourselves.

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Tomdavie, either your math or your reasoning, or both, are way off. Obama has won twice as many states and at this point has an almost insurmountable lead. The onus is not on Obama to win more states. The onus on Obama is to prevent Clinton from racking up the margins that she needs to beat him. If she wins Pennsylvania by 10 points and he wins NC by ten points that washes out her victory. If she wins Indiana (and this is a big “if” since he is currently leading her there by double digits) by say 3 points and he wins Oregon, but she wins the remaining states and caucuses (again, very big ifs) narrowly, she will still be trailing him by more than 100 delegates, trailing him in the popular vote, and trailing him by more than a 10-state deficit. So what then is her argument? That the Superdelegates abandon the states that voted earlier and make her the nominee? That will NEVER happen. If it does, the Democratic Party loses it’s most loyal BASE…blacks. Not to emotion the long-term damage it would do to the young voters that are in-love with Obama. But of course, Clinton has a chance. All she needs to do is do what Obama did in February. Win every remaining state by 30 points and she WINS. That’s her onus. Obama is protecting a lead. She needs to shut up, campaign, and if she cannot catch him, drop out. Simple math if you ask me. Also, if he wins both NC and Indiana

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

“..Definitely it has hurt the Obama campaign. But the fact is it hasn’t, and never will, hurt him where it matters (with his BASE).”
Actually, that’s right. Here’s the point: it is HIS BASE that the 28% is voting against precisely because they do consider Black Liberation Theology important when considering a candidate for the presidency. IOW, it is his machine the 28% objects to and nothing said by either side about unity or attempts to dismiss it as the ranting of and old coot will change that. He can win the nomination but he can’t win in the general election.
Dean and Pelosi are toast. The DNC should have known all of this a year ago but chose to ignore it for political correctness. If anything has come out of the last eight years it is the electorate being sick and tired of political correctness and fear mongering as a means to keep them in line. It isn’t going to work for Obama any better than Bush now that Bush has demonstrated what happens when the press and the electorate fail to hold a president and his staff accountable for their beliefs.
We only hold a man’s belief against him if he holds them against us first.
The Wright/Cone/Farakhan manifestos with Michelle’s thesis will be repeated and reprinted through the fall and even beyond if by some miracle he is elected. Rush is right on this one: he is and will always be the race candidate. And that cripples his capacity to govern because it is the issue by which all decisions he makes will be judged.
Narrow minded? Yes. Inevitable? Without a doubt.
If that makes you uncomfortable, then in the future vette your bloody candidate FIRST.

Posted by: len | April 1, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Len,
You said it! and you are right!

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Russell, if you think Kerry lost because of a swift boat ad that everybody in America knew to be false (and ad that polls actually showed has NO effect on the voting), then you must be smoking something really good. That’s an overly simplistic view of why Kerry lost. Kerry lost because the nation was still in fear post-9/11 and the Republicans played into that fear to perfection. Kerry also lost because that BASTARD Osama Bin Laden released a tape 2 weeks before the election, basically endorsing Kerry for President. Kerry lost because he was a phony politician that clearly wasn’t skilled and believable; giving long, convoluted answers to simple questions. A politician who failed to inspire a nation against a President that for all his flaws had managed to keep us safe. Why do you think more capable politicians like Hillary and Al Gore stayed away? They knew that it would have been difficult to beat the Republicans given the fear of the nation and the perception that democrats were weak on defense. That’s why Kerry lost. His flip flopping. His indecision. His boring, convoluted speeches. The Democrats lost soccer moms to security moms, lost the women vote, allowed Bush to peel off 14% of African American votes, lost 30% of Hispanic votes, and lost the election. Swift boat is a fools tale and you better recognize it.

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Len, i’m sorry, but you don’t make an iota of sense to me. Improve your writing and maybe you might begin to make a little sense.

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Kevin,
Is that the same loser John Kerry, whom you are so busily condemning, that is currently backing your man Obama?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Whos is behind Obama besides the black community? The Mobb?
He came from nowhere so fast, he has nothing to offer besides his speeches.
If Obama becomes President, we can kiss our butt’s goodbye.

Posted by: seah | April 1, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

What these SD’s will certainly look at is that a clear majority of voters (59% of Democrats and 60% of Republicans) think that it will be more difficult for McCain to beat Obama in the GE than it will be to beat Hillary.
The recent Gallup poll shows us that the GOP still (after Wright) fears Obama, while they do not particularly fear Clinton. That’s in line with the Limbaughs and Coulters; as you all know Limbaugh already got Republicans (as in Ohio) to vote for Hillary. Limbaugh said about a month ago on his radio program: “When it’s Obama, we’re done.”
I happen to think that he is right, but anyway: a MAJORITY of Democrats sees Obama as the stronger candidate in the GE, even quite a number of Hillary voters do, all according to the Gallup poll (so don’t blame me for pointing it out, LOL).

Posted by: greg | April 1, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

My last thought for tonight is this:
Obama Supporters-Obama cannot win in nov. besides all of his neg that we know about, and I promise you the Marxist views of his mother that he learned in their household will come to light in nov. right now with all of the facts that are glaring and suprising you in the face you still think he will have a chance against mccain in the fall without the help of the fl and mich. dems (because they needed to be punished for breaking the rules)
You will not have the vote of the Hillary supporters-because the media is supporting obama now-and his supporters who blog-cannot have a decent discussion about the issues-(because he is not as smart as hillary on the issues) so all you can do is rant the bile such as wittgenstein-which has nothing to do with the future and what will happen to help us. so you alienate the other half of the dem party.
Can you do the math-He has no chance of winning in nov.
He will have to leave wrights church-he WILL THEN LOSE the black vote he has.
we will see this young man become old and worn out soon-because the rep. are going to wear him out.
and the rep. will not care if al, and jesse, and wright and any other elites along with kennedy, kerry, and the media he has in his pocket start calling foul-and calling them racist.and marching and boycotting and anything else they will come up with.
obama will not win in the general election against mccain.
old battle worn/already flawed/has taken the on the right before hillary can stand the heat they will bring on.
the media repeating the bosnia story over and over will soon get old and will die-it is light compared to
the rev wright story-which what you have seen now is just the tip of the iceberg-there is a lot more to the wright story-than there is to the bosnia story.
take my advice-if we want to have 1/2 chance of winning in nov.
better go with the bosnia story
than the stay tuned story of rev. wright, marxist mother obama story.
the bosnia story is a safer story.
before this is all over the rev. wright marxist story will have all of his supports mouths dropped, and head in hand at how could we have been so blind.
save the white house for the dems
save yourselves
help stop the war
save your guy obama
put hillary out there to stand up against the rep.
go to fox right now and listen

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

hmmmm, let’s see…we have had one two-term winner in modern us history: bill clinton.
let’s look at our losers: mcgovern,carter, mondale, dukakis, gore, kerry, obama
we never said, oh gee, here, let’s nominate this loser, did we? but we do it almost every time. the elite liberal part of the party is out of tune with reality. get ready for president mccain.

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Kevin,
So it is your contention that it is more important to win states than it is to win the popular vote? I’ll give you the lead in the current popular vote, but please take a look at Michael Barone’s article on U.S. News and World Report that has an easy to follow projection that shows that Hillary will ultimately prevail in the popular vote (not counting Florida and Michigan, mind you), which will remove one of Obama’s foundation arguments. Ultimately, Hillary will end up with a lead of about 350,000 popular votes.
So if I take your argument that states are more important than the national count, I can then argue that it is more critical to win counties than states. In fact, Hillary has won about 10 times more counties than Obama has. So geography wise she has penetrated much more of the nation than he has.
That makes about as much sense as arguing that caucuses are the way to go. There will be no caucus come November.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

What’s your point, Westcoastmessenger? This particular post just shows the lack of depth of your intellect. Firstly, Obama is not my boy. I am neutral in this race, so it’s easy for people to see me as biased if I am not taking their side. One day Clinton people and republicans say I am an Obama supporter. The next day Obama people say I am a Clinton lover. I am a Left leaning Independent. And in Florida I voted for Clinton, not because I don’t like Obama, but because I didn’t think he stood a chance and I didn’t want a protracted battle.
Back to Kerry. I think he is not a good politician, but that doesn’t mean I don’t think he’s worthy of respect. The fact that he backs Obama means nothing to me. The fact that Obama goes to a church that espouses Black liberation theology, means absolutely nothing to me because even though I am White, I have no problem with black who see the discrimination and inequality in this country as a problem that needs to be fixed. I know that some whites have a problem with it. But blacks don’t, Hispanics don’t, and most whites do not (see the polls). Obama is where he is because he has broad white support and will continue to have it because not all whites are bigots. Most whites are sensible enough to understand that there is racism in this country and perhaps its time to elect a black man to begin to fix these problems because God knows that we haven’t fixed it. What exactly is wrong with black liberation theology? And even if you disagree with it, are you going to say with a straight face that Obama believes these things simply because he goes to the church? That’s ridiculous. I am a devout catholic but do not believe in many of the things the church spouses. I support gay rights even though my church is against it. I support gay rights even though my church opposes it. I hear things from the pulpit that I disagree with, but stay because I hear ENOUGH things that I agree with. There is an inherent contradiction in the argument against Obama that leads me to conclude that most of the critics are not being fair.

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

No one will have enough pledged delegates before convention…
Key is SD…
Currently dems has been divided into half between those two candidates…So either side should have convincing arguement to show he/she is the best qualified one…
Both sides have hold strong arguements favoring themselves…
The question is who or which will be convinced…
The dems race is very dramatic.. it could change any time and no one has the answer…

Posted by: True Truth | April 1, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

No one will have enough pledged delegates before convention…
Key is SD…
Currently dems has been divided into half between those two candidates…So either side should have convincing arguement to show he/she is the best qualified one…
Both sides have hold strong arguements favoring themselves…
The question is who or which will be convinced…
The dems race is very dramatic.. it could change any time and no one has the answer…

Posted by: True Truth | April 1, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Drip…drip….drip…..
Rev. Wright’s building a $1.6 million dollar home in a gated, predominately white development. Built using funds from Trinity Church. All tax-free too.
As West Coast Messenger says, the story on Rev. Wright, is in drip mode and the super delegates are watching and listening carefully.

Posted by: sherr | April 1, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Westcoastmessenger, if Hillary wins the popular vote, then she has a case. But I guarantee you, she will not win the popular vote. Pennsylvania will be closer than you think. NC will be an Obama blowout. Indiana will most likely go to Obama. What then is left? After those three states, maybe Clinton will close his now 700,000 lead by 100,000. How can she catch him in the popular vote? Of course, Clinton is yet to release her tax returns. Who knows what those will do to the dynamics as we know them. This is what we know: Obama has weathered the worst and is still standing. Let’s see how Clinton navigates not releasing those returns before Pennsylvania and North Carolina.

Posted by: Kevin | April 1, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

With Anderson Cooper & his entire ‘AC360′ Hour, as well as the whole of MSNBC and CBS News squarely on his side again, Barack Obama should have no trouble from here on out. All these news ‘professionals’ have done a very effective job of diffusing the Jeremiah Wright controversy, while making their best effort to turn Hillary Clinton’s embellished war story into a “critical issue of character”. Because we all know that Obama has never been untruthful about anyting relevant to his qualifications to be president. With this kind of support from the major media, OBAMA is the one who should be the favorite in every one of the remaining 10 contests!

Posted by: Scott Hansen | April 1, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

You keep forgetting about the millions of us who want Hillary who will vote for McCain over Obama. Yes, we will! Watch us! Get used to President Mccain!

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Kevin,
You are trying to sell us some bogus disinformation today and I ain’t buying it. If you had not used this line “a movement spurred by the audacity to reclaim a dream of absolute equality and justice for all” which shows that you have been drinking some big does of the ooolaid, that whole audacity line of garbage, then I might buy it. You’ve shown your allegiances with all your claims. I’ve encountered enough of you Kos Zombies to recognize one when I hear you.
I think you were even willing to lie about having voted for Hillary in Florida just to try to position your arguments a little better, trying to prove you are an open-minded left-leaning independent. Let me help you out, you are just like the rest of the MoveOnOrgies that are trying to stomp on the working class Democrats with your arrogance and elitism, supported by crass, low-class put-downs. The nerve of you to tell me that I’m prone to hyperboles.
Let me simplify it for you once again. B-a-r-a-c-k
O-b-a-m-a
i-s
n-o-t
e-l-e-c-t-a-b-l-e!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | April 1, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

And Hillary Clinton is lying AGAIN.
Hillary appears to have adopted a concerted strategy of telling local media in states that will vote after Pennsylvania that Obama and his supporters are opposed to allowing those states’ residents to vote.
She has made that case in an interview with a local TV station in North Carolina, she made similar comments to a Montana station, and to one in Indiana.
These comments appear to be targeted towards local media; she hasn’t to my knowledge gone this far in her speeches or in her comments to the national political press.
While it’s true that Obama surrogates have called for her to drop out, the farthest that any Obama campaign official has gone is to say that Hillary almost certainly can’t win the contest and that there should be a “sober” evaluation of her chances.
Obama himself has explicitly said she has a right to continue campaigning.
And Hillary, she lies.

Posted by: Petra | April 1, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

What is the difference Obama can make when he is president of US:
1. Can he make a better US economy? Unknown, he is just listening to his advisors;
2. Can he make a good stand on national security and foriegn policies? Unknown, he has to listen to his advisors
3. Can he make bipartisanship? Unknown, depending what he can give Rep – it is the game of give and take.
So what else can he do? Again listening to his advisors and read for public…

Posted by: True Truth | April 1, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Kevin, you’ll have to accept the fact that the list isn’t here to explain to you what you wouldn’t believe if Zeus came down from Olympus to explain it to you.
But since the Obama supporters do go on about their superior education and math, it’s pretty simple: if over one quarter of the Democrats go right in response to a narrow nomination victory by Obama, your candidate loses in the General Election no matter what else you win in the primary. Because the Black Liberation Theology candidate concerns those who really do want a united America, Obama supporters will have to do better than dismissing the issue as not relevant.
You’re stuck with him. Do what you think you have to but don’t believe for a minute that issue is going away. It is getting stronger just as the evangelical right was able to convince the soccer moms that Osama was one airplane away from crashing through their front windows. He has an albatross that generates fear around his neck. Even if he can disavow the BLT beliefs of his church, he has dissembled too often in front of the cameras. If he lied about that, what else is he lieing about?
That is what you will face in the General Election except it comes with big ad purchasing power, more detail, film, voice overs, and prime time.
Where is Kennedy today? Is Oprah defending BLT? Who of the stars will risk their careers to say that these racist rants from his base are acceptable?
Win, lose or draw, at the end of this election Obama is in a boat set adrift by his own crew with windless sails.
Row row row your boat, buddy.

Posted by: len | April 1, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Didn’t Clinton deny a week or so ago that her campaign officials were discussing Wright with the supers? Ickes says “it comes up.” Gee, I wonder who brings it up.

Posted by: jac13 | April 1, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Everyone should check out their state’s party website for a listing of the super delegates in their state.
I found that my local representative in the House is a super delegate, and I have been in contact with him and his office to let him know that he should follow the will of the people in his district, which went overwhelmingly for Clinton.

Posted by: sherr | April 1, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

From Hillary’s County Every Vote Act: “all Americans should be sure their votes are counted” (found on her web site). To, “Even elected and caucus delegates are not required to stay with whomever they are pledged to” (Clinton said in a Newsweek interview, see 3-24-08 issue).

Posted by: Cindy | April 1, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

FINALLY! Lou Dobbs has just addressed (very strongly) the 800lb. gorilla in the room – namely the BLATANT media bias against Hillary Clinton and how he has never seen anything like it,at the same time getting two other journalists to concur with his opinion. I am hoping Lou will continue to exploit this issue against MSM. In any case, I plan to send him a very heart-felt thank you for acknowledging what has been happening to Hillary during this campaign. I urge the rest of you Hillary Supporters to do the same.
Rise, Hillary Rise! 08′

Posted by: LeeLee07 | April 1, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Cindy,
I think there are a lot of delegates in Utah, Alaska, Wyoming and Wisconsin who have Obama voter’s remorse.

Posted by: sherr | April 1, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Kevin, I agree with you, great posts.

Posted by: zz | April 1, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

we Hillary supporters still have our votes in the general election. Guess who will not be getting them?
Say hello President Mccain!

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

LeeLee07: I saw Lou, too. I want to email him, but don’t know the address. Can you post it?

Posted by: cappamore | April 1, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Kevin,
Obama’s popular vote lead is even bigger than the 700,000, it’s about 814,000. Four states in the primary didn’t announce the totals, but realclearpolitics made the estimate for these states.
No way Hillary will catch up.

Posted by: bernd | April 1, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Popular vote and delegates and even nomination mean nothing if you lose the general election. Obama will lose.
Watch us vote for McCain!
Anyone is better than you arrogant Obama supporters.

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

LeeLee07 makes a terrific point! And I am sure Lou Dobbs top of the show topic resonated with a whole bunch of folks.
Is it any wonder that LeeLee07 (comments below) is immediately attacked with such vehemence??
Just goes to show how true it rings! Thanks!

Posted by: Scott Hansen | April 1, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

McCain attacked Obama today…
saying he had no experience and knew nothing about National Security. Obama is going get beat by a 70-year-old.

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Al go ahead vote for McCain. Then give it a rest

Posted by: Sam | April 1, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Kevin, Obama was given free air time to smooth the Rev Wright situation over for the time being. Keith Olbermann and Anderson Cooper couldn’t do enough to analyze and rehabilitate him. The Republicans have been taken over by the rightwingnuts and the Democrats have been taken over by the leftwingnuts. I am not happy with either.

Posted by: Tina D | April 1, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Greg,
No matter what names you call Lou Dobbs, the key point that so many Obama supporters fail to acknowledge is that millions of moderate Democrats are very uncomfortable with Obama.
You can put whatever nasty label on it that you wish, but these quiet Americans won’t scream and holler if Obama is the Democratic nominee, they’ll just vote for someone else in November.
It won’t be because of bitterness, or alleged divisiveness. It will be because no matter how strongly Obama denounces hate-filled rhetoric, the fact that he never took a stand until he had to shows a true lack of leadership and a profound miscalculation that citizens would understand and separate Obama from his mentor, his preacher, his spiritual advisor and member of his campaign up until recently.

Posted by: sherr | April 1, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

al: “Watch us vote for McCain!”
No need to make such a fuzz about it. Just don’t forget to look in the mirror, every day another fellow American will die in our illegal and senseless war in Iraq.
Yes, look deep into your own eyes and think of those who die in Bush’s and McCain’s war.

Posted by: Petra | April 1, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Obama and his cult have alienated lots of us dems. If he is the nom, he will find out the price of arrogance in the general election.
Say hello President McCain!
I hope the young Obama fans enjoy their draft! Me: too old to be drafted. Oh, that’s right, anyone over 50 is not needed anymore in the dem party. That is why we will leave.

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Yeah Greg – THAT Lou Dobbs. I cannot speak about the Condi Rice deal, but on the media bias against Hillary Clinton, he is dead on. I am glad someone in the media has the integrity and guts to finally address this issue. Every last one of us is aware that this is what is going on, but MSM doesnt’t talk about it because most of them are in the tank for Obama anyway. No, I’m not mad at Lou at all. I hope he brings it up each and every day.
Rise, Hillary, Rise! ’08

Posted by: LeeLee07 | April 1, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Petra, unfortunately they could care less if more people die in Iraq.

Posted by: Sam | April 1, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Petra..
I and MILLIONS like me will have no problem looking in the mirror. It is you Obama fanatics that will have to answer for 4 more republican years.
Have fun!

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Petra and fellow Obama followers:
There is a good chance you will be able to give reports from the front lines in Iraq on what your fanatic Obama support has engendered. Good, you SHOULD serve your country.
You want a divisive inexperienced hater as president? Well you have to pay the price. Droves of us will vote McCain and no doubt leave the party.
Look at the history of dem losers. Enough is enough. Have fun with your little ultra leftie adventure. You will get exactly what you are asking for.

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Howard Dean should resign.
This is worse than his scream!

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

al: “I and MILLIONS like me will have no problem looking in the mirror. It is you Obama fanatics that will have to answer for 4 more republican years.
Have fun!”
I lost my only and dearest brother Mark in this war, you horrible man. Mark was 21 years old when he died in 2006 from a road side bomb.
Go to hell with your hate talk.

Posted by: Petra | April 1, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

I heard Rep. Murtha tell Chris Mathews that if Barack wins the nomination He believes Pa. will vote for him during the General Election. So I guess Murtha must not want the rep. to win.

Posted by: Lauren | April 1, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Petra,
I have news for you. You can’t force people to vote for Obama. Ok? Try to realize that. Millions of us Dems will not vote for him. We will vote McCain. Try to take responsibility for your own actions and stop trying to force others to vote your way, when they are not interested. Maybe now you are thinking about what the results of your fanatic Obama obsession REALLY will be! Good!

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Petra
Please accept my condolence. I am very sorry your brother died in this god forbidden war .This war should never have been started in the first place. Please extend my heartfelt apologies to all of your family members.
May GOD be with you all.

Posted by: Lauren | April 1, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Al how can you blame a McCain win on Obama supporters. They are voting their party, apparently you won’t. So don’t point fingers where they don’t belong

Posted by: Sam | April 1, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

… because the simple fact is that while Obama’s supporters can very possibly make him the nominee, he can’t get into the White House without Hillary’s supporters – and that just ain’t happening. With their disrespect, insults, and venom to a former first lady and her supporters, Obama’s people have burnt the very bridge meant to take Obama to the White House. Obama, I am sure, have an idea of what his supporters post on these blogs about Hillary, just like he knows about the unfair racist attacks his surrogates have levied against both Clintons. He pretended to be above it all. He could have completely changed the tone of this campaign if only he had wanted to. By his silence was his consent. It is really all over for him, except for the shouting…
Rise, Hillary, Rise! ’08

Posted by: LeeLee07 | April 1, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

LeeLee,
Exactly. But Obama and his followers cannot take responsibility for their own actions. This is why we need a new party.

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

AL
Your statement to Petra was uncalled for why is it you are the one and only that has a right to voice your opinion? She has every right just like you. It is obvious to most of the people in this blog room you are a nasty mean person. You Have a right to go for Hilary. Like others have a right to vote for and campaign for Barack.

Posted by: Lauren | April 1, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Wright will be a big issue in the general so why shouldn’t the Clinton people discuss it with the superdelegates???

Posted by: Eric | April 1, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

al -
If Hillary does not get the nomination, my last act as a Democrat will be to cast a vote for John McCain. I will then change my party affiliation to Independent. I really wish Hillary would run as an Independent. You are right about the third party. I think after this election, members of the Democratic Party will be so disillusioned and fed up that they will leave the party in droves. I don’t think the party can recover from this – we have been totally disenfranchised. This is not the party we signed up for. :<

Posted by: LeeLee07 | April 1, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Guys we should listen to John Kerry! Hillary should drop out and Obama should be the nominee, and eventually the President!
Kerry knows exactly how to win against the Republicans!
He beat Bush back in ’04!!!
Oh….wait….he lost didn’t he?
You should be ashamed if Democrats, independents, and the world loved you and you couldn’t beat Bush in the general!
SHAME ON YOU JOHN KERRY!

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Ok Al, so Petra isn’t who she says she is, maybe an Obama operative posting. So that either makes you a Hillary operative posting or a republican, right, cause you couldn’t possibly be real

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

The older dems can leave the party and vote for McCain. Who cares. The energized younger voters will make up the difference.

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Looks like the Obama spporters are finally owning to being the far left Kunicich crowd

Posted by: geevill | April 1, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

I agree with Eric.
We have become far too politically correct to the point that no one is talking about the elephant in the room.
Rev. Wright has literally packaged up ammo for the Republicans in the form of a CD collection of his sermons for sale!!
Now we see that the church is building a beautiful home for him in a gated suburb of Chicago with Trinity picking up the 1.6 million dollar mortgage.
The Democratic establishment is embarrassed beyond belief because the “elders” thought they could slide Obama past the electorate who is sick of Bush.
No matter what kind of damage control might work in the Democratic nomination process, it just won’t in the General. For any Democratic delegate, pledged or otherwise not to grasp this is just idealism gone terribly wrong.
I don’t want either Democratic candidate to make history, I just want them to work like crazy to restore our economy, our standing in the world and to sensibly scale back and eventually depart from Iraq.
I don’t think Obama or his campaign has the mettle for a knock down drag out against the Republicans. And no one will care about being politically correct or feel sorry for the surrogates who will cry foul at every turn.
The MSM will also be singing a much different tune, and the Obama campaign will be inexperienced positioning themselves when they are behind in the polls.

Posted by: sherr | April 1, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

@ Sherr
They just showed the new pastor at Trinity say, “The Wright Family is the RIGHT FAMILY”

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

@ AL
I’m a young voter (19) and I plan to vote…… FOR HILLARY!

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

The older dems can leave the party and vote for McCain. Who cares. The energized younger voters will make up the difference.
************************
You are going to miss us more than you know …
The Democratic Party has overplayed their hand in this situation. They think we are going to vote for Obama for the “Good of the Party.” What they haven’t figured out yet is that we have come to the realization that this Party could care less about us and what we think or want. Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Kennedy, Kerry, Richardson and all of the rest of the Party’s leading members – the dawning of November 10, 2008 will witness the ruins of the Democratic Party … and they will have only themselves to blame.
Rise, Hillary, Rise! ’08

Posted by: LeeLee07 | April 1, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

al, you write
” I am sickened that I have spent my life with this party, and for what? To be kicked in the face.”
Kicked in the face by whom or what? By the fact that Hillary is losing this race? By FA and MI messing up their own primaries? By Howard Dean who in the end only says that the clear front runner must be the nominee after the last primary?
I’m serious. You’re SO angry, but why exactly? I suppose you can’t hate Obama simply for being in this race, can you?
You blame everything and everyone and cry foul and spew hate, simply because things aren’t developing in a way you had hoped they would?
Isn’t that a bit… childish? And proof of a lack of realism? Americans voted for Clinton and Obama: 814,000 more for Obama. Who is to blame? And WHY blame anyone for such a historical fact?
You might indeed need some introspection. And don’t yell etc. against people who don’t yell at you.

Posted by: bernd | April 1, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Al I am in my 50′s with 2 kids in college. The youth will definately vote in the general election. When is the last time you saw the young get out there in droves. I honestly don’t remember. And trust me, they don’t want a 70 year pres. The Bush and Clintons have been in the white house their whole lives. They want change. And exactly why are the Obama supporters angering you. Personally, I like Obama but would gladly vote for Hillary.

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Al Gore actually won but it was stolen from him

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Dems nominate losers. Time to form new party.

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Sorry but the youth have not been coming out check out the exit polls there are more people age40-60 coming out alot of new women voting across the board

Posted by: Bishop | April 1, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

@ll
There have been a few news stories on candidates who have had the youth vote in the past, namely Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern.
It’s exciting that the youth vote has finally found someone to get excited about. But I’ve already seen some disillusioned 20-somethings lose interest when Mr. Obama stopped talking about change and hope. It just wasn’t ringing true anymore.

Posted by: sherr | April 1, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

To say Obama has the youth vote is absurd, it is fifty! I am 19 and I support Hillary, and I’m not some anomaly!

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

I am ready for a new party I hope Hillary runs as an independent

Posted by: Bishop | April 1, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Youth vote. Look at the size of the generations. Baby boomer generation dwarfs all other generations. Boomers vote. And yes, youth is disillusioned easily. Especially when they figure out that they have been had. Most youth will not support the idea of Obama spending 20 years in that hateful “church” and then pleading he never heard a bad word. Most youth will wise up.

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Obama can’t hold a pep rally in every state.they vote all fifty at once in

Posted by: Bishop | April 1, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Lauren,
Yeah, but…
I would refer you to Paul Krugman’s op-ed in the NYTimes of February 11, 2008, “Hate Springs Eternal”. Keeping in mind that Paul Krugman is a highly respected economist who writes thoughtful reasoned essays, unlike some others opinion writers at the Times.
To quote, he writes, “Why is there so much venom out there? I won’t try for fake evenhandedness here: most of the venom I see is coming from supporters of Mr. Obama, who want their candidate or nobody.”
Something tells me you’re going to disagree with Mr. Krugman. But, AL’s comments in this blog notwithstanding, I have to tell you everywhere I go in the blogosphere I find Mr. Krugman’s assertion to be true most of the time.
It may appear differently in this string of comments here, granted. Most of the time, however, I would say that Mr. Krugman is right on this point.

Posted by: Scott Hansen | April 1, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

This blog is ridiculous.
Obama is already focusing on McCain.
Hillary is still on Wright, superdelegates, and FL & MI. If she hopes to win she has to change her message. This I am a fighter message can only last so long. She is begining to sound like a broken record.
Come to think of it so do many of these posts.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | April 1, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

“Al Gore actually won but it was stolen from him”
He won the popular vote, but the election wasn’t stolen from him. It was his to lose. Had he carried his own state of Tennessee, the election would have had a different outcome.
The general election is about electoral votes and he didn’t get the majority of those. Nothing was stolen.

Posted by: LOM | April 1, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Now, if any of you think that the Rev. Wright is over, then you must be naive and new to politics.
The reason, the issue is in the back burner right now is the fact that the Republicans now know that they have been handed a golden gift for the general election against Obama. You are now going to see the right wing intensify their demonization of Hillary so that they can have Obama in the general election.
Watch the folks at FOX and other conservative news outlet go after Hillary to build up Obama. Have you seen D. Morris lately? Doen’t he seem obsessed with the defeat of Hillary Clinton?

Posted by: SO1 | April 1, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

@ thinking
“This I am a fighter message can only last so long. She is begining to sound like a broken record.”
The pot calling the kettle black, anyone?
Obama’s scandals will make him a dud in the general election!
McCain said today, “Obama has no experience and knows nothing about National Experience.”
Yes, listen to McCain! He knows he can convince Americans to support him by pointing out Obama’s flaws and he doesn’t even have to touch Obama’s lies and/or scandals!

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

II,
same here. For the first time in their lives my kids (16 and 18) really care about politics. And about America as an idea, an ideal, and as country with a complex history that translates itself in where we are today. I LOVE their enthusiasm and dedication to the great issues of our nation. They, as all the kids in our country, are our future in the making. And yes, I give Barack Obama enormous credits for reaching out to young people so naturally and convincingly. What matters, and matters enormously IMO, is that our young people CARE about this country, not because they ‘should’ (as some think people ‘should’ wear a flag pin) but because they WANT to. They’re fully motivated! Yes, fired up and ready to go!
The difference between that youthful enthusiasm and a guy like ‘al’ who seems to be worse than the grumpy Archie Bunker couldn’t be bigger.
In fact, in my remembrance, there is a lot happening in America thanks to Obama now that is reminiscent of the Reagan revolution in its beginnings, even though they differ on various issues. But as a movement towards a stronger, better and more proud America it is Obama who has all the political magic and the continuous momentum this year, while McCain is a weak and passive regression politician who will get this country nowhere.
And I’m not posting for the campaign, if such things happen, I’m posting as an ordinary high-school teacher and a father of two terrific kids – who LOVE Obama. And I STILL understand them.

Posted by: bernd | April 1, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

bernd,
I have never seen so much division in my life. Obama is no unifier. All that about your kids is great, but they are being snowed. I hope your kids are not of draft age. When McCain wins, depending on the situation, there may be one!

Posted by: al | April 1, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Hillary says of course the Rev Wright! The Republicans will use it. Sure after they figure out how McCain can explain this:
Reverend John Hagee has called the Catholic Church the “Great Whore.” He has said that the Anti-Christ will rise out of the European Union (of course, the Anti-Christ will also be Jewish). He has said all Muslims are trained to kill and will be part of the devil’s army when Armageddon comes (which he hopes is soon). John McCain continues to say he is proud of Reverend Hagee’s endorsement.
Reverend Rod Parsley believes America was founded to destroy Islam. Since this is such an outlandish claim, I have to add for the record, that he is not kidding. Reverend Parsley says Islam is an “anti-Christ religion” brought down from a “demon spirit.” Of course, we are in a war against all Muslims, including presumably Muslim-Americans. Buts since Parsley believes this is a Christian nation and that it should be run as a theocracy, he is not very concerned what Muslim-Americans think.
John McCain says Reverend Rod Parsley is his “spiritual guide
McCain can’t beat either Democratic Candidate
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | April 1, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

@ thinking
Where is the twenty year relationship with those Pastors and McCain?
Where is the proof McCain didn’t JUST use them for an endorsement?
Has he called them their “crazy uncle”/ thrown his grandma under the bus for them/ called them his spiritual advisers?

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Well John when McCain said that the Rev.
Parsley is his “spiritual guide”, that is pretty definitive.

Posted by: Thinking | April 1, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

McCain is going beat Obama like Bush beat {uber popular} Kerry back in ’04!
and face it, McCain is NO Bush.

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

The DNC, and the legislators of MI and FL decided that the vote wouldn’t count. Suddenly Clinton has (moral+ ethical questions?), makes me laugh. Where was she months ago when this decision was decided?
Another I voted for it even though I was against it, statement. It’s just politics.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | April 1, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Howard Dean, who is in the tank for Obama, and the REPUBLICAN Legislators voted for the vote not to count.
If their isn’t going be a REVOTE, the original vote should stand.
People have given Obama options and his cocky attitude has rejected all of them without proposing a solution.
All that is going happen by ignoring those two states IS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ARE GOING BE ANGRY THAT THIS ELECTION SEEMED MORE THAN RIGGED.

Posted by: John | April 1, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

bernd, I am a baby boomer. Our kids are the future and should have a say. Why are they wrong because they don’t agree with the establishment. People just love to dismiss them as immature nobodies in this election

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Wait till they find out just what he thinks about hand guns and many other issues if we ever get to see where he stands and wait till they hear he does not want his daughter punished with a baby or an std what is that all about. I can’t wait until they show his pastor friend who want all gays killed. why didn’t he pick someone like TD JAKES

Posted by: Bishop | April 1, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

al,
a last comment, I must go. You write: “I have never seen so much division in my life. Obama is no unifier.”
I can understand you see that division. But where does it come from? Not from Hillary or Obama, IMO. They’re both doing a good and tough job in fighting for the nomination. They’re both highly skilled, very clever, and strongly dedicated to a Democratic agenda for America’s years to come. They share a lot of ideas, not surprisingly, for they are fellow Democrats.
The nasty division is created mainly by the media, who constantly try to stir us up (they need their attention) by throwing rumors and scandals and pseudo-issues at us that make us angry or scared or bitter or whatever. That whole media game in the end is only about attracting viewers and readers and bloggers, i.e. about making big money out of such a “boring” subject as politics. Our reactions to Jake’s teasing stories are totally over the top most of the time: we begin to divide and tear apart what was and is united in the Democrat’s agenda for this country.
And you yourself are an example of such a divider as well, I find. You, for a reason I didn’t hear yet, no longer belief in the unified party; you tell us time and again you’ll vote Republican.
So yes, that pretty divisive. I think however that it’s the media that took you to that point, not any divisive difference between Hillary and Obama. In political ideas, in the pragmatism of their proposals, there’s no such difference.
I lost track of what I wanted to say I’m afraid, and I must go now. I’ll be glad to vote for both Hillary and Obama, depending on who gets the nomination (I voted for BO in the primary): I think they’re both very strong candidates who both can beat McCain in the GE. I think you should stick to the good old party as well; it won’t ever change to your liking when people like you leave it behind.

Posted by: bernd | April 1, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Oops, typo. Hillary’s Count Every Vote Act (not County). Sherr, I can only speak for Utah that there is not Obama voter’s remorse and I am a delegate.

Posted by: Cindy | April 1, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Al you will be one of the ones responsible for sending our kids to war not the people who vote for Obama. So stop blaming it on them. They are voting for their party.

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

you think a sixteen and an eighteen year are old enough to knw all about what the whole United State needs your kids must have what they want

Posted by: Bishop | April 1, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Count Da Votes
I’m all for personal responsibility and agree with you that someone has to pay for the transgressions of MI and FL.
Since both Governors were complicit, I propose we IMPEACH these governors. With the history of FL and botched elections, the FL Governor bears even more responsibility. He has to go first.
IMPEACH the GOVERNORS Now!
Make it your Cause Count Da Votes!!!

Posted by: The Commander Guy | April 1, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Bishop I have no idea how old you are but what these kids learn today is nothing what I learned. They have advanced placement in courses such as political science. In class they have debates about the canidates. You have no idea how much they know about politics these days. Every year Harvard invites numerous uninversities to a political debate. These kids are not the kids of the past where they know nothing.

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Are we talking cp clases I have three grand children in high school . Who are all honour students.I also had problems of democracy in high school and have always been politicly active. But my views have changed over all theese years as will thiers and just like in 68 when I was in high school this thing looks like it is headed the same way

Posted by: Bishop | April 1, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Let’s see..Obama has the Wright issue to deal with while Clinton has the sniper incident, Bill’s issues, her selling out of Bosnia, her failed health care plan, travel gate, condemning jews, too many lies to count but one of the best was lying about where her daughter was during 9/11…really LOL….so I guess we get to see if some of those supers Harold is threatening have any brains at all. Talk about unelectable…LOL Really….I am surprised anyone can even say that with a straight face..really LOL

Posted by: Deanna | April 1, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Bishop, you are probably my dad’s age. We are from the south. He and I differ on canidates. He is a racist. He said no white man will vote for a black man. It kills me that he feels this way. But that is how he was brought up. But our kids don’t feel this way. Our kids are extremely educated. The internet has made them wise beyond their years. They are the hope, it’s their turn

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Someone posted about “taking to the streets of Denver” if FL and MI are not counted……It’s over. You need to understand how that happened. Who is really at fault. It most certainly was Clinton and Obama who agreed that if you guys broke the rules you would not count. Using the empirical “you” because you guys elected the people who decided that they (you) could go against the DNC and lose your delegates.
To even attempt to make a thinking person “think” either race was “fair” and should be counted at this date is just not going to happen. It was not fair and the DNC will not, nor will any of the committees, allow Clinton to accept those votes as a true indication of a vote in either state.
So I guess you can plan to “take to the streets” but it will not change the outcome if it even makes it that far…but your, and others like you, threatening to do so? Will only encourage the DNC to hasten the super delegates to decide BEFORE Denver.

Posted by: Deanna | April 1, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

For every idiot racist who says ” No white man will ever vote for a black man”…perhaps someone needs to take the bottle from his hand and introduce him to the over 200 elected officals in the United States and tell him that the majority of the popular vote that Obama enjoys did not all come from Black people. News flash to him perhaps….

Posted by: Deanna | April 1, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Dear SuperDelegates,
As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.
The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.
Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.
Why?
“Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
yours,
mencken

Posted by: mencken | April 1, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

I have family in Penn. Conservative at that. They are freaking out about Wright and “his” values. They are voting Democrat this season due to Bush. They are firmly in Hillary’s court and are circulating their own emails about Obama’s sleezy ties since the Media won’t. These are some pretty mainstream folks under 30 years of age.
Interesting to say the least.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 1, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Count, take it up with the DNC and stop being annoying with the caps

Posted by: ll | April 1, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Pastor Wright should have a religious position in the White House to give spiritual guidance for Obama and the first lady Michell .

Posted by: Francise | April 1, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Since Bill Clinton used him in his hour of need he would at least know his way around the White House LOL

Posted by: Deanna | April 1, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

There you obama people go again, with your anger and hate and “holier than thou” attitude…..YOU GET REAL.
THE VOTES NEED TO BE COUNTED.
After they ARE, we people who are NOT for obama will take our votes elsewhere…….naaahh nnnnahhh.
Goodnight all ! : ) : )

Posted by: COUNT THE MI & FL VOTES & SEAT THEIR DELEGATES | April 1, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Anyone who thinks a vote in FL or MI should stand is actually disenfranchising the rest of the country. We followed the rules and candidates won fair and square and now you want US to accept a faulty election? AFTER your states broke the rules to boot? Really? Really? Not in this life time.

Posted by: Deanna | April 1, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Isn’t Ickes one of the bozos that voted to strip Florida and Michigan of their votes? Now of course he wants them to count because he’s with the Clinton Camp….how ’bout bringing up the losers and hypocrites that Hill and Bill hang out with too? Clintons just rolling in the mud and dragging everyone with them.

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Here’s a (large) part of an interview with Eleanor Roosevelt on Hillary Clinton:
JZ: Can you give specific examples of her lack of ethics?
ER: Yes, a large number of them are described in the book Hillary’s
Pursuit of Power. As the book documents, most of the allegations of her misconduct were not the concoctions of what she defensively characterized as a “vast right wing conspiracy.” Instead her scandals were first exposed by Democrats. For example, in 1992 when
Hillary and Bill Clinton were campaigning for their “two for the price of one” presidency, their fraudulent “Whitewater” transactions were first exposed in the pro-Democratic New York Times by Jeff Gerth an investigative
journalist.
Early in their first term Hillary headed the “Presidential Task Force on Health
Care Reform” that the General Accounting office found cost the government
$13.4 million dollars. It also cost the government $434,000.00 for legal fees in
defending challenges to the secrecy of its proceedings. Since the task force
operated in violation of federal “Sunshine Laws” Mrs. Clinton and others were fined $285, 864.00. The final plan was 1,324 pages long and was
summarily rejected without debate by the Democratic controlled Congress.
When she unveiled her plan Democratic Senator Pat Moynihan the then
chairman of the Senate subcommittee that had jurisdiction over it, was
adamantly opposed to it. Because her plan allowed the insurance carriers to
manage the practice of medicine and denied patients freedom to choose
their doctors — he was unwilling even to hold hearings on it. Similarly liberal Democratic Congressman Pete Stark of San Francisco, chairman of the
House Subcommittee on Health Insurance. also refused to hold hearings on
what the media called “Hillarycare.”
Of all the criticism of Mrs. Clinton’s White House role one of the most
incisive was by New York Times editor Abe Rosenthal — who over his entire
career had been a bulwark of support for liberal Democratic causes. He
wrote that:
In concept, the First Ladyship… evades anti-nepotism statutes and avoids
the responsibility that should go with authority…the First Ladyship has
become a government center. In lieu of salary it provides the jobholder with
staff, luxury, and that most important of all perks — power.
On March 4, 1994 an editorial appeared in the pro-Democrat New York Times
entitled “White House Ethics Meltdown,” stating that after the apparent
suicide of Vincent Foster, the deputy counsel:
Chief White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum interfered with the
investigation by the National Park Service and transferred secret files to Mr.Clinton’s private lawyer. All this paints a picture of a White House dedicated to short-cutting justice if that is what it takes to shield the financial affairs of Mr. Clinton and his wife from scrutiny.
President Clinton then requested Nussbaum’s resignation. Eventually, more than 30 other top officials of the Clinton administration were investigated,indicted, convicted or forced to resign. Three associates of Hillary and Bill Clinton pleaded the 5th amendment privilege against self incrimination — and others fled the country.
During their 1996 campaign Hillary Clinton, and her White House staff were
used receive campaign money illegally. Her office was frequently visited by
Johnny Chung, a Chinese-American entrepreneur who had known the
Clintons in Arkansas. Chung made a total of $366,000 illegal contributions to
the 1996 Clinton campaign.
On August 22, 1997 in an editorial entitled The White House Turn Stile the
New York Times commented on still other activities that Chung had
disclosed to Tom Brokaw of NBC News:
Mr. Chung said he gave $50,000 to a Hillary Clinton to help pay for a
Christmas reception in the executive mansion. Hillary Rodham Clinton said
she had no recollection of such a meeting.
Finally, before departing the Clintons took moving vans filled with
government property from the White House, including china, antiques, and
other furnishings. Also more than 140 last minute pardons were granted that
were highly questionable. As result the Clinton offended the sensibilities of
some fellow Democrats who finally spoke out.
Al Hunt of the Wall Street Journal — and previously Bill Clinton’s staunchest
defender on NBC’s Capital Gang — said on February 24, 2001: “They leave
a stain that is bigger than anything in impeachment…I think the damage is
severe. I think it is lasting. It’s on Bill Clinton’s legacy. It’s on Hillary
Clinton, and it may well be on the Democratic Party.”
Jimmy Breslin, New York’s liberal Democratic columnist, had known Hillary
since 1974 when she worked on the Nixon impeachment. On January 31,
2001 he wrote in Newsday: “Bill Clinton was taking arm chairs and coffee
tables as he left the White House…Every time Hillary Clinton passes a bank
the alarm goes off. Her name now and forever more is Senator Shoplift.”
Paul Goldman of the Democratic National Committee published an article in
the Wall Street Journal of February 15, 2001 titled Democrats Must Censure
Clinton, stating “Clinton didn’t just take the White House China, he took its
soul and flushed it down the toilet.”
The eleventh hour pardons were granted in violation of guidelines that had
been in place for decades in the office of the Justice Department and
followed by all past Presidents. One of the last minute pardons involved
Hillary in particular. In 1999 six of the leaders of a Hassidic group in
Rockland County New York had been convicted in for swindling $40 million
in federal funds in the form of fictitious Pell Grants. In her campaign for the
Senate had visited the group and promised to help their leaders.
Two other pardons were granted to Edward and Jo Gregory over the
strenuous objections of the Justice Department. They had been convicted of
bank fraud in 1982. The pardons came in March 2000 during Hillary’s hotly
contested Senate Campaign – to which the Gregory’s made contributions.
The guidelines were also ignored to grant pardons to several felons who had
paid Hillary’s brother Hugh Rodham fees of $4,000 for representing them.
The most notorious pardon was of Marc Rich, a multi-national financier who
was on the FBI’s most wanted list. Rich had ties to Castro in Cuba and
Gaddafi in Libya, had abandoned his American citizen, and fled to
Switzerland to escape arrest here. Rich and his wife Denise then had an
amicable divorce and she began to represent him in the United States.
As was reported in Time Magazine on February 13, 2001: “Marc Rich’s
socialite ex-wife has donated an estimated $1 million to Democratic causes,
including $70,000 to Hillary Clinton’s successful Senate campaign and
$450,000 to the Clinton presidential library fund. She also lobbied heavily for
Marc’s pardon.”
Some of the Clintons’ strongest prior Democratic supporters denounced
the Rich pardon. For example, liberal Massachusetts Congressman Barney
Frank said: “It was a terrible thing he did…It was just abusive. These are
people who forgot where the line was between public service and what was
personally convenient for them.” Democratic Senator Joe Biden of
Delaware said “I think the President had an incredible lapse of memory or
was brain dead.”
One of the most forceful criticisms of the Clintons was by President Carter’s
former Chief of Staff, Hamilton Jordan. On February 21, 2001 Jordon
published an article in the Wall Street Journal titled The First Grifters, stating
that in describing the Clintons:
A word comes to mind: grifters — a term used in the Great Depression to
describe fast-talking con artists who roamed the countryside, profiting at the
expense of the poor and the uneducated, always one step ahead of the law,
moving on before they were held accountable for their schemes and half-
truths.

Posted by: eleanora | April 1, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

YES he voted to strip the votes of FL and MI and now is trying to say they should count…just like Clinton…people and states only matter if she needs them and he needs them to keep that paycheck coming. So go ahead and send more money lOL Mark Penn got paid over 8 million dollars since Feb. but the vendors went unpaid…shows who counts in Clintons world.

Posted by: Deanna | April 1, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

deanne,
do you think obama can win the white house from mccain without the votes of the dem in fl and mich and the supporters of Hillary?

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

eleanora – dude…noone is going to read that ….summarize aye?

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Deanna,
That would be none other than “WestCoastMessenger”. And he is correct. We will take to the streets. Maybe even before Denver if needed.
Why?
Because we know a shame when we see one. And we will not let OUR DEMOCRATIC party be taken over by a gang of left wing, bleeding heart, birckenstock wearing, latte drinking, muddle minded, fanatical, ill mannered, reality blinded, group of miss informed, highly educated IDIOTS.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 1, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Yes I do. The majority of the American people are behind him and the majority of Hillary’s people care about the party as a whole and will support him. People with a brain in FL and MI KNOW that it is not Obama’s fault their vote is not counting so they will not hold it against him. Actually he is the ONLY one right now STILL trying to get those votes to count.

Posted by: Deanna | April 1, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

SadStateOfAffairs – Ickes, the new mouthpiece for Clinton voted against Florida and Michigan to get their delegates seated…think about that one. Obama followed the rules and now your saying let them count? how fair is it that a cheater wins…she should not have campained there and should have pulled her name from the ballot…I bet the counts would have voted had SHE followed the rules.

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Sorry, that copy ‘n paste didn’t work out.
@pablo -
the shortest summary Roosevelt’s interview on Clinton might be:
” “A little scary” is an understatement. I see her as dangerously corrupt.”
The whole thing is jzeifman dot com, Jerry Zeifman’s site, the Former Chief Counsel to the House Judiciary Committee.

Posted by: eleanora | April 1, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

It was a faulty election and would disenfranchise the rest of the country if those votes are allowed to count. If you want to get into a war? I would imagine, based on polls, that the rest of the country would out number the small amount of people who would actually take to the streets from MI and FL because many of them? Understand who cost them their votes. Many of you are simply using this as a political ploy to slam Obama when the majority knows whose fault it really is….and none of you can explain away Hillary voting to disenfranchise FL and MI along with Obama and Harold the Ick.

Posted by: Deanna | April 1, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Obamadefector – Yeah…go ahead and vote with your color…most people (myself included) might actually vote for whom they feel is the best candidate….race or gender may just be a coincidence in the end.

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

I see the Obama bologgers are in full force tonight.
Pity, it won’t work for the next 10.
Wanna Bowl????

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 1, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

SadStateOfAffairs – Nah…lets compare campaign contributions or tax returns – – Did any news ever come out of her release of schedule from her time as first lady?

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Let’s assume for a moment that this nomination goes to the convention floor and Obama wins the nomination in a scenario that MI and FL aren’t seated (since they failed to a) hold second nominating contests or b) appeal to the DNC’s credentials committee to be seated).
How does an Obama nomination reconcile garnering MI and FL support in the general election and the potential feeling that MI and FL were disenfranchised during the primaries?
If the argument is that these swing states won’t matter in the general election, then these two issues don’t have to be reconciled, but if they are important, how does he win those states?

Posted by: LOM | April 1, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

What makes you think Hillary’ supporters will support obama after all the vile things that are said to them, and why would any people from fl and mich with a brain vote for him-since he and his surrogates were in on the punishment of them in the primaries.
I and many Hillary supporters will not vote for obama in nov. because his handlers (dean,bradley,kerry,kennedy and co) hijacked the dem party.
I want the smartest person in the position of the president.
Obama is not the smartest-He is not smarter than Hillary on the issues-we need a president who can think on their feet-when articulating the issues-obama cannot. obama claiming to be a uniter
has fractured the country-with this rev. wright thing -the dem party-by causing an alienation of hillary supporters-and the black community-by causing-and not denouncing-the threatening of elected black officials and voters if they do not support obama.
he is supposed to be the candidate of change-but he has been the cause of many black people who have never voted before to reg. and follow him blindly-placing hope in him hoping their situation will somehow or another change just because he is in office.
obama and his handlers are doing to the poor and working poor black people what karl rove and bush did to the rual and evangelical voters.
the media is biased
I do not want my first black president to win like this.
and he will not win against mccain for the reasons I stated above-no fl, no mich, no hillary supporters. No obama president plus hillary is smarter that he is on the issues.

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Poor Super-D’s. They are soooo confused. Geez, do I take the “American Idol” or “Rocky”? Oh my gosh. Do I want the pretty boy or the laser guided missle? Should I pick the good looking, charismatic, smooth talking, anti-american, anti-white, anti-semetic, anti-pregnancy, anti-american, pathological lair fellow?
Or, should I take the one who isn’t perfect, but knows how to talk to rouge nations, fix the economy, provide healthcare, restore integrity with our allies, and end a WAR.
Poor Super-D’s.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 1, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

pablo, what good will it do you to see hillary’ tax returns?
will it get you universal healthcare
if your heritage is as your name sounds
will it keep your fellows from having to go to war?
will it get you affordable healthcare?
will it help the economy in anyway?
pablo, What will seeing Hillary’s tax returns do for you?

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

LOM – he can reconcile that byblameing the people that actually screwed it up – their elected representatives voted to move the dates knowing full well what would happen. You reconcile those votes by bringing up what Bush did in FL…please keep the governor out of it.. Michigan will be more difficult but can be done.

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

jgaw – if she’s as crooked on her tax returns as she is on her storytelling, it may not do all that you say…just will prove she is not the one to do all that you say…as for my heritage….born in the U.S., 100% American. Not sure what your inferring but I really wouldn’t go there.

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

I think blaming the people who actually screwed it up is lacking forward-thinking and leadership. If that would truly help reconcile the potential rift, why isn’t Senator Obama trying to hold them accountable now.
I think if he truly wants to be viewed as legitimate come the general election with MI and FL, he should attempt to be more vocal and proactive NOW rather than playing catch-up in a GE contest.
Blaming people may point to the root cause of a problem, but it doesn’t begin to bring resolution to the real issues.

Posted by: LOM | April 1, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

LOM – I understand that but how is anything going to get reconciled without getting it all out in the open…and I agree, both of them should be saying what really went wrong in those states

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

What good is it to see Hillary’s tax returns……are you kidding me. LOL She is shady to say the least.

Posted by: Sam | April 1, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

I think it is fair to identify the sequence of events that lead to the current situation of MI and FL, but I find it puzzling that Senator Obama isn’t doing more to ensure that these two very critical states (in my opinion at least according to past general elections) don’t feel disenfranchised one way or another.
Let’s assume for a moment he becomes the nominee…blaming other people while exhibiting what seems to be a lack of leadership to bring a voice to these two states is not going to bode well with these swing states in the GE. This is a very serious problem.

Posted by: LOM | April 1, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Obamadefector – Can I borrow that crystal ball ’cause WOW!! it must be awesome to know what is going to happen…is that the same crystal ball that said mccain was out and hillary was a sure thing?

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

All my friends I talk to say as of today:
They will vote for McCain if Obama gets the nod. At least McCain is a deserving candidate.
I agree with them 100%.
Because, OBAMA has 0 experience and yet he wants to be the president. That’s STRANGE to many.

Posted by: Jkan | April 1, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Jkan – To each their own. I think Mccains time should have happened 8 years ago to be honest with you. I agree he has served his country honorably….I can’t remember his name being brought on any money scandals like clinton or obama…but I bet there are skeletons in the closet….I love the idea that Rush, Hannity and Coulter don’t want him in…that alone is almost enough to get my vote over Obama but not quite

Posted by: pablo | April 1, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

pablo, I have no doubt you are 100% american, your name suggest of latino extraction. my is african-american
and if latino is correct. until this war there had been a imbalance of the number of african american and latino going into the military in hope of paying for college-economics.
now back to hillary and her taxes-I will take hillary and her taxes and knowing she will do what she has said she would on healthcare,student loans,ending the war responsibily,and getting this country back on the right track. what I do know is what I see right now in obama-a copier, and in his very short political career-a whole lot of trouble. a lot of the stuff people go on about with hillary-is dreamed up, made up, and down right crazy-that is why some of it stays around so long-it is not because she is so good and such a crook they are good at covering it up. it is because most of if is blown up in peoples minds and simply not true.
and most people would rather believe and talk about that kind of stuff-rather than try to understand the issues and talk about them-
My husband said he was talking to a nurse-and she said she could not stand hillary because she was the cause of her having an hmo and a ppo-just crazy stuff.
hillary is be good for this country.

Posted by: jgaw | April 1, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

@Jkan | Apr 1, 2008 11:51:46 PM:
This should definitely be of some concern for folks. Granted, there has been one poll conducted (Gallup, March 26) which showed 28% of Clinton supporters voting for McCain if Obama is the nominee and 19% of Obama supporters voting for McCain if Clinton is the nominee.
This is a troubling statistic for whomever is the democratic nominee. For obvious and many reasons, the DNC is in a bit pickle if they don’t find a way to resolve the current division within their party.

Posted by: LOM | April 1, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Obama is leading because people did not know him at first and voted for him. It is a different story now, most voters that voted for him would take their vote back now.If he get nominated, in november he dont have a chance, and McCain will be the president.

Posted by: Dragon | April 2, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

pablo,
all three of these people are only human
there most certainly are skeleton in mccains closet the keating deal, who knows what went on between he and the wife he divorced after he got out of the prison camp. but the fact remains is they are the only three we have right now to chose from for president. so instead of wanting to see how much dirt and skeletons we can dig up on these people-the only way we can truly judge them is on the issues of today, and what they say they will do for us if they are elected.
no perfect human beings just public
servants all three wanting to be our president.-judge them on the issues-not the dirt.

Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Pablo,
The topic is Super-D’s and what should they do? They are twixt and in between. Your attacks on fellow bloggers exposes who you really are.
I have to tell you. Initially I thought Barack Obama was a phenomen. Something you don’t see in your lifetime. A leader that would make history. And, I thought he was worth looking into. What I found wasn’t pretty. As a matter of fact, he is disturbing. And fellow bloggers like MattOhio, Jgaw, Westcoastmessenger, and myself have been trying to guide you to the “Facts about Obama”. We now realize that there are forces in the media that are difficult to overcome. However, we will inform, contribute, and MARCH if that is what is needed, to keep the ill informed, young, inexperienced, and disillusioned fellow americans, from making the most severe mistake of their lives.
We won’t let it happen. Why? Because we love you….and we love our coutry.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 2, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Sorry for the typo’s in the last post.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 2, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

And I love you too SadStateofAffairs!

Posted by: LOM | April 2, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

SadStateofAffairs,
thanks, and so true.
A campaign forged the way his was cannot win
he and his handlers and all the people who are backing him-al, jesse, and co.
know it is true.
and no doubt when the tide turns they will all cry “foul”
but the fact of the matter is the more we learn about him-the more we know
it was “foul” from the very start.

Posted by: jgaw | April 2, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Jay — I was just looking at the website and was a bit surprised to see the scales tipped way the other way. The main problem with that site, however, is that it is not robust to fluctuations in the polling. The model the author uses needs to do some smoothing and/or rolling averages of polls — it looks like the most recent poll is the decision source.
Nonetheless, the latest snapshot is a grim picture for both candidates, but I don’t think it would actually be the brutal if the general election were held today.

Posted by: LOM | April 2, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

deanna:
Eleanor Roosevelt died in 1962…..
she was a brilliant woman, but I didn’t realize she was a psychic.

Posted by: questioner | April 2, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

re: Eleanor Roosevelt.
that was “eleanora” who posted that unique inteview … not “Deanna”
My sincerest apologies.

Posted by: questioner | April 2, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Obama willing to meet with foreign dictators WITHOUT PRECONDITIONS.
Obama imposes several PRECONDITIONS for voters of MI and FL to revote.
Is this somebody who loves America? NO!!!
NOBAMA!!

Posted by: Mahesh | April 2, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

bho supporters smuggly think they can win the general election without Hillary supporters. the fact is, what carried bho past hillary in most of the states is the black vote–90%-10%. this part of the equation, black voters, ALREADY vote democrat, so this is a given for democrats. what he needs is to swallow up large numbers in other groups, including hillary supporters. without pulling in large numbers of these voters he has no chance of winning come november. ALL of my hillary friends have said they will vote mccain, spelt “anyone but bho”. one thing is sure if bho is the nominee:
he will run,
he will loose,
he will be done in the party as a viable national candidate..you do not run twice…

Posted by: fedup | April 2, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

If Hillary is bringing up Rev. Wright, Obama should bring up Bosnia, because I can see all sorts of ads showing her lying…..and “do we want a liar in the White House”? Obama can counter ads with Rev. Wright fairly effectively. He does not support this guy and he should make the country more aware of his good attributes (Now!) not just he 10 sec. soundbites. Hillary is a flawed candidate….and the Republicans still prefer to run against her to Obama.

Posted by: Peg | April 2, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Peg, have you lost your mind! the bosnia thing in no way compares to bho’s 20 years of affiliation with a racist hate filled un-american mentor/friend/spiritual guide(a vietnam vet…was he drafted….)he is also affiliated with the black panthers(who went to durham, nc threatening to kill the white boys accused of raping a black hooker, when there was no evidence), farrakhan, rezko,…he said he never heard what wright said, then in “the speech’ he said he did. his wife has never been proud of the country till her husband won a state in the primary. and it too goes on and on.the key if he is the nominee running against mccain will be to see if bho and/or his followers can turn all the attacks around calling them racially motivated. seems to be the pattern.

Posted by: fedup | April 2, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Wright… Yes, we can…
Rezko… Yes, we can…
Farrakhan… Yes, we can…
“Tell me your friends are and I tell you who you are.”
OBAMA is a snake in suit…
Snakes are lethal be careful folks…

Posted by: Kikz | April 2, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

“Tell me your friends are and I tell you who you are.”
The Clintons have no friends.

Posted by: greg | April 2, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Yeah right…
BARACK has plenty…questionable friends or group of people…
Wright…
rezko…
farrakhan..
etc.
etc..

Posted by: Kikz | April 2, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Jay writes:
“a joint Clinton/Obama ticket is the only way for the Dems to win the general.”

Posted by: Navarro | April 2, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Clinton is leading John McCain in a GE in Florida, Ohio and Penn. WOW!
Obama……not looking too good.
Let’s see how the Super-D’s handle the “new will” of the people. There’s going to be a whole lot of hand wringing now. The more the Supers beat up Hillary, the better her ratings get.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | April 2, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Obama philosophy: Deny and destroy. Don’t pay for your mistakes. Deny ever hearing or seeing anything. If you don’t want to pay for your mistakes just get rid of them or blame someone else.

Posted by: sparklewdc | April 2, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

It’s 7 months til the election and we’re looking at how people poll in Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Let’s go back 7 months to the polls. HILLARY IN A LANDSLIDE!!!! So much for polls.

Posted by: Don Hannaford | April 3, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.