‘American Skin’ (41 Points) — Why West Virginia Matters
FROM GUEST-BLOGGER RICK KLEIN:
Hi gang — Rick Klein here from ABC’s The Note, filling in through the end of the week for my colleague Jake Tapper, who is on a much-deserved vacation. (I know, none of us thought he took vacations, either.)
If you’re not familiar with The Note, first of all, you should be, and second of all, here’s an introduction.
Today we round up where things stand the morning after an Obama drubbing — a 41-point shellacking in West Virginia. Obama has lost before (though rarely by this much), but what makes this different is that this contest came a week AFTER the mainstream media declared this race over, done, and finished.
Democrats were told for seven solid days that it was just a matter of time before Clinton bowed to the inevitable, and two-thirds of Democratic voters in a swing state just looked at Obama and said thanks, but no thanks.
The pre- and post-contest spin from the Obama campaign has been about the math: That this is too little, too late from Clinton to make a difference in the nominating contest. They’re probably right — the math is quite stubborn, as the ABC political unit points out this morning.
But it seems like leaving the response there ignores the real lessons of West Virginia. Yes, the Clinton brand remains powerful in places like West Virginia in particular — yet the Obama brand has become a force in its own right. Yes, some voters are racists — but that doesn’t fully explain a 41-point margin.
The fact is that working-class voters (and yes, primarily the white ones) aren’t hearing something in what Barack Obama is saying. The campaign can pretend like this isn’t a problem, but if it’s not a problem now, if will be in the fall. There are signs that, public pronouncements aside, the Obama campaign gets this — it’s one reason Obama is in Michigan today. He may have this locked down, but his hard work is just beginning.
– Rick Klein
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
You guys forget to notice that while Hillary won 68% of the voters who decided in the past month (a large majority of them), Obama succeede in pulling even with those who decided on the day of the election for the first time in months.
So whatever you say, the coverage DID have an impact. As well as on the turnout.
And you are mixing up white blue collars with Appalachian blue-collars. Obama has a huge problem with the latter. He has won blue-collars in other parts of the country.
Posted by: Benjamin | May 14, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
According to this website, if you add FL and MI into the popular vote counts, Clinton is now ahead. Hummmm. Are the democrats prepared to annoint a nominee without FL and MI?
Posted by: A reader in georgia | May 14, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
BHO does not have enough time to try and kiss up to the white blue collar workers. He doesn’t get it. Shooting some pool & drinking a beer with them does not change anything. A lot of these people are not uneducated they are under educated and especially not dumb. BHO and especially that hateful wife of his will not win this class of Americans over.
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
you know what cracks me up is that for the week leading up the pundits were saying that Hillary was going to win by this much… then it happened and they were like “oooooohhhhhh snap!! I can’t beleive that just happend!!!!!!!!”
Posted by: matt | May 14, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Hillary is getting a free ride right now. Obama won’t attack her. McCain won’t waste his time on her because she won’t be his opponent in November.
This is her farewell tour for 2008, and Obama isn’t going to rain on her parade.
She can say whatever she wants, no matter how dumb, and Obama isn’t going to call her on it.
Enjoy the moment, Hillary. In a few weeks, I hope you’ll be out there working as hard for Obama as you promised you would. But I’m not holding my breath.
Posted by: Jay Biggs | May 14, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
I think the media is not realizing that this is MORE of a regional problem than Obama not being able to get the white working class vote.
Obama’s problem isn’t white working class voters per se but rather APPALACHIA.
Obama will probably get a large chunk of the white working class voters in Oregon, Montana, and South Dakota but will have problems in Kentucky (part of Appalachia).
The problem with Appalachia is that that is part of Pennsylvania and Ohio where Obama needs to do well.
Six months ago was Hillary considered by these folks as the “champion” of the white working class voters? Nope. Instead what she did was change her message and campaigning to appeal to these voters.
Obama needs to change his message and campaigning to appeal to these voters as well. He may not win over the majority of these voters in the Fall against McCain, but he has to get a larger chunk of these voters in order to win in the general election.
If he is able to do that, Obama will win the general election. If he is not, it will be much more difficult for him that he will have to get NEW VOTERS in the process to overcome this problem.
Posted by: Stacey | May 14, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
It’s a amazing how pundits like Rick Klein will make a big deal of a win of this size in a state tailor made for a white candidate running against an African American, but yet dismiss a big win for an African American in Mississippi as nothing but a reflection of demographics. They are effectively saying black votes don’t count as much as poor white votes.
Posted by: DTD | May 14, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
I think Obama gave her that state in hopes if she would win big she would feel better about getting out. His mistake for ever thinking such a thing. I hope he is done making crazy moves like that. I am an Obama supporter but I am also disappointed he did not go in there and fight for that state. He needs to let everyone know who he is and what his policies are. I feel he could have come very close if he would have worked that state.
Posted by: Becky | May 14, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
If you respect the voters of FL and MI, you don’t say for months that their delegates shouldn’t be seated.
If you respect the voters of WV and KY, you don’t turn up your nose and refuse to campaign there like you only ‘care’ about people if you think you need them to get you the big prize.
If you respect small-town voters, you don’t call them bitter and clingy and put down their values.
“Change we can believe in?” That “we” sure doesn’t include a lot of folks.
Posted by: You beat me to it | May 14, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
First off, she can’t run as an independent, she would have to declare Separately in each individual state, with some deadlines coming up in June. She will stay in until June 3rd just so there is no time limit on recouping her debts. And lastly, any democrat woman who votes McCain, might as well sign over her reproductive rights, because there goes roe v. wade. So tell me how sour are those grapes?
Posted by: huh? | May 14, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Get over Fl and MI for Hillary. It will not help her at this point. Look you can not count popular votes. Impossible. If they try then that leaves out a lot of other states such as Iowa.
Posted by: Becky | May 14, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
This was a “How Dare They” moment from the Hillary supporters.
How dare the media tell us he’s the nominee when the voting is close and not over.
How dare they tell us our votes dont matter.
How dare they tell us she has no chance when she has the same chance as obama. With the help of superdelagates.
Posted by: toby | May 14, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Yes there is a segment of the voters who will not vote for Obama, no matter what, and they must live in WV. But hey look they vote Republican, they have a rough life, little opportunity, and do not seem to know the way out.
Posted by: Thinking | May 14, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
There are many things to say about FL and MI. But one important thing is what it reflects about Obama. He is a typical politician looking out only for himself.
Go tell the voters of FL and MI to ‘get over it.’ Let’s see how some of them like it.
Then again, when did an Obama supporter actually acknowledge that the other side might have some legitimate grievances? They’re too busy kissing the feet of The Great One.
Posted by: You beat me to it | May 14, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Men for hillary/against obama, Mccain says he wants to increase our military forces, without giving them the proper GI bill they deserve. If we are having trouble now building our forces, what is he going to do different? Maybe have a flashback to Vietnam and reinstate the draft?
Yeesh.
Posted by: huh? | May 14, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
huh?
If you can’t understand the roe v wade arguement for your own vote, think of all of those daughters of yours. In some cases, granddaughters.
In my younger voting years, i never gave r v w much thought, but now, i’m married, and have daughters. The decision and right belongs to them. NOT John McBortion!
Posted by: DAVID NH | May 14, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
I live in Massachusetts, we support Hillary. She won the primary here, soundly.
We and I am so sorry to say fell for the BS Deval Patrick spewed (he a newbie, inexpierienced, grass root messiah)BO has the same slimy playbill out there. He is bound to be a big disappoint also.
We will never, ever, support OBAMA! NEVER!
Posted by: HP Boston | May 14, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Thinking and other Obama supporters,
While you trash West Virginia, Bill Clinton won it twice. Al Gore lost the election there. Obama is the new McGovern
Posted by: geevill | May 14, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
A win in West Virginia, a nomination it does not make…This is a small white state. It is irrelavent in the grand scheme. Clinton is clinging to nothing but her ego. Next week and the week after will ne the real end. She’ll lose OR, MT and SD, which are pretty white states in their own right…
Posted by: Paul | May 14, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Dennis, You may want to spell “arguement” correctly before you tell others to get a college education.
Posted by: Just saying | May 14, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
cindy in nc: YOU SAID IT THE BEST! RIGHT ON!!!!
Posted by: stella | May 14, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
huh?
If you can’t understand the roe v wade arguement for your own vote, think of all of those daughters of yours. In some cases, granddaughters.
In my younger voting years, i never gave r v w much thought, but now, i’m married, and have daughters. The decision and right belongs to them. NOT John McBortion!
Posted by: DAVID NH | May 14, 2008 10:16:20 AM
David, reread my post, we are on the same page.
And wow whoever brought up roe v. wade fearmongering ha! I thought republicans were against having the government tell you what you can do, but that is exactly what they are doing with trying to get rid of it. They are trying to have the government control your body.
Perhaps bigger than this presidency is the fact that two count them two vacancies will be on the supreme court.
Now for all you civic class heroes, they are in that position for LIFE! not 4 years, not 8 years, for Life.
So it has been a long primary season, and arrows were lobbed by both sides. But please realize that McCain is far more conservative than he is a “Maverick” and he has to pay back those who would get him in office. That’s not you and me.
Posted by: huh? | May 14, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Hi Rick…
Thanks for filling in for Jake.
Go Hillary!
Posted by: cindy in nc | May 14, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Are the DNC, Media and Obama/supporters so blind or in denial to keep thinking that Hillary supporters will ever vote for Obama in November? The way that she’s been treated and robbed of this nomination by starry-eyed zealots who think Obama is the “second-coming” is not something that will be forgotten or forgiven in November. We have long memories and can/will be very spiteful if we think our candidate was treated unfairly. The dismissive attitude of Obama and the media is disgusting and will be handsomely rewarded with our votes for McCain come November.
Posted by: Hill Will | May 14, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Obama has been forced down our throats (media, George Soros)as our first affirmative action candidate. But, as the old saying goes, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink. (Maybe the water is bitter.)
Posted by: Ruby | May 14, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
The Clinton campaign recycled her Pennsylvania “anti-elitism” message that resonated extremely strongly with WV voters – which created a large protest vote. A good portion of this WV electorate wasn’t for change – it was an angry mob vote in the guise as support for Hillary.
Posted by: Robs from NYC | May 14, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
I’m sure West Virginians will appreciate being called an angry mob.
Hearing this stuff makes me even more happy I reregistered Indy.
I will never vote for Barry, never. Me and millions like me. Get used to it.
Posted by: al | May 14, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Robs in NYC you need to give the WVA people credit because they can smell an elitist a mile away. That is why they didn’t vote for Gore or Kerry. They do not like to be looked or talked down to.
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Hahaha to all Hillary supporters. Even if she wins the remaining states by the same margins she won the most racist state in America (West Virginia), she still will NOT win the nomination. Isn’t West Virginia where boys marry their sisters?
Posted by: Kevin | May 14, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Oh Cindy…that is such a below the belt comment. Obama is just a man, please don’t explain his loss with such stupid adjectives…like snooty.
I hate reading comments about either race, white or black. That is the appeal of Obama that he would take race out of the conversation if elected. Many in this country think he is a once in a lifetime candidate.
I am a Hillary supporter but I can see that Obama has much appeal to many folks.
Let’s keep the dialogue high minded. The attributes of both candidates should be judged on how electable they are. I think Hill is the one who can exceed the numbers needed to win against Mac.
Obama, however, has a email database that is astounding and those small supporters are who the Democrats want to go after in the Fall. Obama offers that and IMO the supers certainly are taking that into consideration. Newsweek has an article on this by Jonathon Alter …It’s about the Benjamins…the Ben Franklin currency will be the deciding factor in this race.
Posted by: LL Barra | May 14, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Oh Cindy…that is such a below the belt comment. Obama is just a man, please don’t explain his loss with such stupid adjectives…like snooty.
I hate reading comments about either race, white or black. That is the appeal of Obama that he would take race out of the conversation if elected. Many in this country think he is a once in a lifetime candidate.
I am a Hillary supporter but I can see that Obama has much appeal to many folks.
Let’s keep the dialogue high minded. The attributes of both candidates should be judged on how electable they are. I think Hill is the one who can exceed the numbers needed to win against Mac.
Obama, however, has a email database that is astounding and those small supporters are who the Democrats want to go after in the Fall. Obama offers that and IMO the supers certainly are taking that into consideration. Newsweek has an article on this by Jonathon Alter …It’s about the Benjamins…the Ben Franklin currency will be the deciding factor in this race.
Posted by: LL Barra | May 14, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Wait I know this has been touched on before, but how does someone who “jointly” is worth 109 Million dollars call someone else an elitist?
They are all elitist, that’s how they got to be politicians.
That’s like Warren Buffet calling Bill Gates a rich snob.
Come on
Posted by: huh? | May 14, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
The RCP Average for the Democratic Presidential Nomination as of today: Obama leads Clinton more than 7 points nationwide. That’s what counts. In big states such as California and Clinton’s own NY he’s already doing better than HRC against McCain. The polls indicate that he’ll the win the GE in Pennsylvania and the GE in West-Virginia, Rasmussen tells us, is currently a Obama-McCain tie.
I’d say Obama is doing exceptionally well; Clinton is disturbing the Democratic agenda with populist chatter, that’s all. Winning ordinary folks over with populism isn’t exactly something to brag about.
Posted by: herta | May 14, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
All the people that are degrading, racists, and just plain rude are playing into the media. They love discourse and you are just fueling what they do well, LIE…it is a sad day in our country when people who concsider themselves intelligant are saying they will vote for a was monger like McCain if their candidate doesn’t get the nomination. I would bet Hillary will say, if she doesn’t getthe nom., tat she supports Obama, but really will down him and do hwatever prove her point that she should have been the nom.
But what will happen to our counrty. I really don’t give a crap about Hillary or Obama, but we need someone to get us out of this mess and McCain won’t do it…
Posted by: truthtell | May 14, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
The geniuses of the Democratic Party made a huge mistake pushing Obama and trying to oust Clinton so forcibly. She has proven to be tougher and more likable than they thought. Her supporters worship her and are maxing out donations to her campaign. At the beginning of the race for the nomination the talk was that we would have eight years of Clinton followed by eight years of Obama. The geniuses of the Party (including all the big losers like Kerry, Kennedy, Edwards, etc.) decided to skip Hillary dreaming that they could lure voters with an empty rhetoric of change that only resembles Fidel Castro’s narrative when he took over (change, hope, end to the corruption of Batista’s government). Obama’s speech style even resembles Castro’s… At the end of the primary season Obama is exactly among the constituencies that he was at the beginning, and he won’t defeat McCain with pundits and internet bloggers.
Posted by: Robin | May 14, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Bill may be an elitist but he also has the Bubba affect being a small town country boy & that is where he wins them over. BHO doesn’t have that at all and his wife is all attitude and it is a turn off.
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
You’re right – its unfair for me to label WV voters as such. I got caught up in all the hate and wound up propagating it myself. Just goes to show how divisive these campaigns are becoming.
Posted by: Robs from NYC | May 14, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
I think the media frame: why can’t he get white voters who make under $50K a year is the wrong frame to use.
The better question is: why do white voters who make under $50K a year in a GE consistently vote for the Republican?
Obama does have to answer that question this year. I think Hillary Clinton would have to answer the same question if she had actually won those states she didn’t contest?
Racism and anti-diversity vote accounts for some of it since Democrats didn’t win the South for the most part since Lyndon Johnson.
The way the media keeps talking about the numbers without going behind them is kind of disingenuous. Floating the belief that Obama can’t win white voters doesn’t preclude the man on the street interviews you all COULD and I would argue SHOULD have done throughout the states you all claim he can win. If the voter you ask says some impolitic things on air, then you would be reporting on the ground what was said.
The media has an obligation to tell us the truth even when it leads to some impure places.
Posted by: Genna | May 14, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
“She has proven to be tougher and more likable than they thought”
???
Hillary Clinton has the lowest ratings when it comes to likeability and trustwortiness of all Democrats in the whole United States of America…
A MAJORITY of Americans does not like or trust her.
Therefore she’ll NEVER be President of this great country, simple as that.
Posted by: maria | May 14, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Robin
Oh, Clinton supporters are maxing out their donations trying to help her? How come she is $20 million dollars in the red despite being OUTSPENT 4-1? Her supporters are non-college educated, broke toothless bastards that have no dime to give. As for us Obama people, we have money galore.
=======================================
“Money galore?” Oh really, so then tell us, Robin, WHERE DOES IT COME FROM, and “online contributions” is not a satisfactory answer.
Posted by: Yavol Lem | May 14, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
I find it amusing how delusional some of you Hillary people are…..Obama an elitist? Seriously?
Hillary ran a terrible campaign due to her own cockiness and elitism that she was the nominee.
Obama is the real deal. You will be disrespecting this country if Hillary supporters vote for 4 more years of Bush and McCain over Obama.
Obama will make this country a better place to live
Posted by: BK | May 14, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
West Virginia does not speak for America. West Virginia speaks for racist and incestuous folks. Oregon, a real state, a state we can be proud of, will have their say next Tuesday and we’ll get their verdict.
Posted by: Kevin | May 14, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Kevin’s reasoning:
Every state that votes for Obama is a “state we can be proud of.”
Posted by: Which Great Lake is in Oregon? | May 14, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
So when the media told you about BHOs campaign office being vandalized did they forget to tell you about one of Hillary’s campaign offices being burned down?
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
People who hate like the TUCC, Obama and his supporters. Birds of a feather flock together.
Posted by: Bob4USA | May 14, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
David et al:
Roe v. Wade?
Note, the President does not get to overturn Roe v. Wade. If that were the case, why has GW not been successful? He is a strident pro-lifer. Our SC has had infinite opportunity to overturn Roe and has not chosen to do so. The SC justices are lifetime appointments. The only way John McCain gets to appoint a justice, with the advice and consent of the Senate, is a SC justice dies or retires.
Even given the opportunity for John McCain to appoint a judge he believes to be like Scalia, Alito or Roberts, that does not translate into throwing out Roe v. Wade. Note, Justice Seuter was a Repub appointment. No guarantees once the justice is sworn in.
If you folks watched the interview Of Justice Scalia last month on TV, you would have noted his position and explanation. Even if Roe were overturned, that would not mean that there would be a federal prohibition against abortion. It simply would mean that each state would then decide, if it had not already done so in the past, on the woman’s right to choose and the parameters and limitations of the exercise of that right.
This is not the 1960′s!! Which states do you actually believe could legislate successfully to prohibit abortion??
Abortion is a non-issue in this election. The use of it to scare people into supporting Obama is outrageous.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 14, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
IL resident, thanks for this info. It saddens me to know that part of the environment in WV has been ruined by corporate interests.
I, too, believe that it is Obama’s arrogance that is hurting him. It was really an insult to West Virginians not to even ‘condescend’ to campaign there–to make one visit to show him that he was with them. Is that how he would like to be treated? How he would like other folks who have it tough to be treated? What does this say about his vision for America?
Let’s not forget, West Virginians aren’t doing so well in this economy right now. Doesn’t Obama get it??
Posted by: 57 states and counting | May 14, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Since 1916 Every Democrat who won the Presidency won West Virginia. Obama just lost West Virginia and the Presidncy. Vote for Hillary or McCain never Obama.
Posted by: Bob4USA | May 14, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Why do you feel comfrotable calling the WVA vote “racist” and yet totally ignore the 92% black vote for Obama by not calling that “Racist”? Double standard here, folks!
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Im not sure why the democratic Party is even messing around with this situation. The way I see 1/2 the country is going to be upset no matter who the nominee turns out to be. Obama may be ahead now but rest assured that come November Obama will have no chance against McCain. Not saying McCain is the man who should win, I’m just saying people would rather vote for McCain then Obama, however they would vote Clinton before McCain. So Clinton should stay in the race and lay her claim to what is right. She can take it all the way to the white house can you say that about Obama, NOT A CHANCE!!!!!
Posted by: kito11 | May 14, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Al….most have already outlawed abortion at least in the 2nd tri-semester. It won’t take much to move forward once the Feds have lifted theirs. I am not trying to scare anyone with a lie,it is the truth. Roe vs Wade has been tittering for years. Just one or two more against abortion justices will do the trick…
Posted by: truthtell | May 14, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Obama has a plan for Oregon? Really? His plan is to move a Great Lake there, folks.
Posted by: You beat me to it | May 14, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Obama totally “dissed” WVA by blowing off the state and not campaigning there. Hillary campaigend in EVERY state – she did not blow anyone off. Is Obama saying he doesn’t need the white blue collar voters? Is Obama saying he has no intention of trying to connect or understand the white blue collar voters? Is Obama’s attitude revealing that he is unable and unwilling to represent and lead all Americans? Obama is not American through and through – he was raised in Indonesia during his most formative years and then lived in Hawaii (not representative of heartland America in values or anything else). DNC- this is such a mistake you are making.
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
WV knows a liberal socialist when they see one.
PS-His wife and pastor hate America.
Posted by: Sluggo | May 14, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
You know what is funny here? Obama went into this race as the underdog, new, one term senator who didn’t have a chance against the Clinton machine. His organized campaign blew her away. She had to dig up stupid crap just to keep above water. The Clintons truly felt, when they announced that they WERE the candidate. So now they are cheering everytime they win, which should be a given for a politician with her standing. Her followers are SO mad that Obama went into the race and is ahead at this point, that they are whinning, and whinnin…The race isn’t over yet, and Hillary may still pull it out folks, but if she doesn’t Obama will be the candidate. Let’s pull together, and win this race in Nov. no matter who the candidate is.
Posted by: cindyct | May 14, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
It does not matter what us true blue americans think, the DNC are going to do what they want no matter what happens, they’ll worry about it later. Believe me when I say that if Obama gets the nomination then more then the democrats will be divided.
Posted by: kito11 | May 14, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
kito…they will only be divided if Hillary and her supporters let it happen. It looks like you guys have already made up your minds…to bad…we all loose that way.
Posted by: cindyct | May 14, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Kito11,
I agree. Obama’s advantage comes from victories in caucuses in very red states like Idaho where only about 20,000 people voted. That is not going to stick in November.
Posted by: Robin | May 14, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
I am from Michigan and I will not forget that Obama fought to have my vote NOT count. No matter how much time he now spends in Michigan – the damage is done! His true attitudes leak out and then he tries to smooth them over with “that is not what I meant”. That happens way too often for it to be a mistake.
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
The lack of understanding some people show for the process amazes me sometimes.
The facts are quite clear. After WV, Hillary Clinton leads in the popular vote – I know that you Kool–aid drinkers don’t want to count Florida and Michigan – maybe you all had the same Marxist professors Obama sought out in college – but you see, in America, we count all the votes – The votes in those 2 states were certified by their respective Sec. of States. The DNC has no power over them – they can simply deny the seating of their delegates at the convention – until the credentials committee rules on their status. – it’s just that simple – and I know you will whine and complain that the candidates didn’t campaign in FL or that Obama’s name was not on the ballot in MI – The truth is Obama did campaign in FL, running cable TV ads for weeks prior to the election in violation of the agreement he had with the other candidates and the DNC – as for MI, he took his name off the ballot there by his own accord, in order to curry favor in Iowa and with the explicit hope of invalidating results that he knew would favor Clinton – he then conspired with his supporters in the MI legislature to thwart any effort to allow for a revote there – a somewhat callous and audacious political calculation for such an uplifting, inspiring leader – and one that will fortunately come back to haunt him.
Facts can be terrible things but they are what they are – and after 2.5 million people vote in Puerto Rico, Clinton’s popular vote lead will be undeniable and insurmountable and trust me – the Democratic party will not do to Hillary Clinton what was done to Al Gore 8 years ago. Super-delegates will not overturn the will of the people – it’s just that simple – I could go on but I see by the old clock on the wall it’s time for your next dose of Kool-Aid.
Posted by: oldspice | May 14, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Obama has won only two primaries since Wisconsin – Mississippi and NC, both dominated by black turnout.
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Cindyct,
Why doesn’t Obama drop out of the race if he cares about the Party? If this is about the Party, Hillary has the core members with her except for AA who I am sure will go with her if she is the nominee. She has a better health care plan, she has a great economic agenda. Even Obamanites like Maureen Dowd from the NYT acknowledged in a round table with George Stephanopoulus that if he is
the nominee we may be locked in the Fall with to presidential candidates neither of whom has a good economic plan. Obama should be gracious to his Party and bow out, it’s not his time yet.
Posted by: Robin | May 14, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
The liberal media outlet try to spin this as a racist victory. The numbers reveal that his core constituency is eroding. The Wright Effect and the inability to hold a center view is taking effect. It was showing in Indiana and it will continue to the end of the nomination process. The DNC can force him on the party, but he will be history’s first 4 year lame duck should he manage to win the GE.
Frankly, I don’t think he can win but McCain could always blunder big toward the end.
Posted by: len | May 14, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Funny… Obama blew Clinton out 10 other times with margins of victory larger than the one she pulled off in WV.
This one doesn’t matter. At all.
Posted by: Stephen | May 14, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Robin…why should he drop out? He is ahead. Would Hillary graciously dropout if she was ahead…notta…let’s wait until June and see what happens. As I have said before, I will vote of Hillary if she is the nominee unlike many of you Hillary supporters who are nay sayers…
Posted by: cindyct | May 14, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
I didn’t know obama is so wicked,lets say he’s a monster,by what he is doing, trying to win the nomination for the first time for the blacks in particular and the whole nation in general.It’s unfortunate he stepped on so many toes doing it,causing unpardonable griefs and anger to a lot of people to the extend they swore to make sure he doesn’t win for their party, my question is this, be sincere to yourself who is the real monster here?
Posted by: bp | May 14, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
thiselection…OMG you Hillary supporters really believe that crap…well we surley are doomed….
Posted by: cindyct | May 14, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
rockthebleachers: “Obama has won only two primaries since Wisconsin – Mississippi and NC, both dominated by black turnout. ” GOOD POINT. The DNC has to recognize the turn of the tide since Super Tuesday. Obama’s halo effect of being so “new” has worn off. It is a whole new election since NH. If all the primary voters were to be cast today – the outcome would be totally in Hillary’s favor. And this will reveal itself in Nov. if Obama is the nominee.
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Stephen..nothing matters to the HRC supporters but winning no matter what way…she was supposed to win this state by large margins over two months ago…so what is the celebation?
Posted by: cindyct | May 14, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
It is telling how Obama does not look people in the eye – he is always looking over the tops of their head- nose in the air. Watch him. His head is at a tilt upward – looking over everyone’s head.
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Stepehn please check your facts. Only once more than 50 and she blew him out by about the same in Arkansas. Oh, lets get excited for his blow out in Alaska he had 302 votes to her 103. That really is an astounding victory to be proud of. Salute! Don’t forget those cauces like in Maine where you had a total of 3500 voters. Like those are the only ones that will show up to vote in the GE!
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
There is no way Obama would be winning if “Rev.” Wright had reared his head in January. That’s why Obama didn’t want Wright around when he announced his presidential bid. Obama saying he only ‘found out’ about Wright recently is not credible.
Posted by: You beat me to it | May 14, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
DTD…no one is dismissing Obama’s wins in larger populated black states…..the problem with comparing that to white blue collar workers is that is a much larger demographic needed to win the general. Blacks make up 14% of population, and I’m guessing blue collar whites are a much larger group needed for any Democrat to win (except Reagan Democrats, who will now become McCain Democrats).
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
You Beat…and Hillary isn’t kissing up because she is ahead? I still do not agree with your side if the story. Hillary went to the vote on this and the state legislature made the decision not Obama…but you wouldn’t agree with that anyway so just don’t read that post..People like you ignore what you don’t understand.
Posted by: cindyct | May 14, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
thiselection…I don’t look at gender or race, i NEVER have in my lfe. So don’t go there. I vote for the BEST candidate, and I don’t care if they are Dem,Rep or Indep
Posted by: cindyct | May 14, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
“the state legislature made the decision not Obama”
Please stop wasting time here with this argument. What part of “Obama’s surrogates killed any possibility of a re-vote. Obama has said over and over again that FL’s votes shouldn’t count” did you not understand? Whatever, take your argument to the voters in FL in the general and see how that works out.
Posted by: You beat me to it | May 14, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Hillary sounded like and looked Presidential last night in her speech.
Obama fell flat on his face last night answering questions at the factory in Missouri. Obama rambled on and on boring them to death and he threw in some hmms and uhhs too. He quoted Hillary’s proposals word for word. He did not connect to the working-class voter’s period and Obama will not connect with them in the general election either. He was not energetic he was just as bored as the people listening to him. Obama is truly weak, uninspiring and pathetic. This is Obama when he is faced with questions by the people and in debates. No wonder he is a big chicken and he will never Debate with Hillary again because he got his butt whipped every time he did.
I agree with other posters here. Obama is an empty suit for the people with no experiences, false promises, with more corrupt, criminal, unethical and immoral associates than any other candidate in the running for President. Perhaps that is why the La Times reported on April 27th that Obama had laundered $112,000 thru his Law Firm he received Robert Blackwell. In return Blackwell received political favors and $320,000 in Illinois State Grants. Blackwell then donated thousands of dollars to Obama’s campaign. This is just one example. Here a few more NAFTA gate with Canada, FARC and Hamas deals and millions of dollars bundled by George Soros under investigation for several counts of money laundering. Birds of a feather flock together. Quick Obama here come the Cops. “Here comes the judge, here comes the judge, here comes the judge”. What a great line by Sammy Davis Junior on Laugh In. Vote for Hillary or McCain never vote for Obama.
Posted by: Bob4USA | May 14, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Missile from Iran fired into central Israel from Gaza today, much damage done.
What will Obama say/do? Constant sore indeed.
The Iranians have armed Hamas.
Posted by: al | May 14, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Popular vote as of May 14, 2008
These figures INCLUDE Florida and Michigan, as they were fairly and legitimately earned by Senator Hillary Clinton, and have been validated by the respective Secretary’s of State.
Obama 16,680,827
Clinton 16,710,298
Total Diff. +29,471 (Clinton)
Pct. Diff. +0.08% (Clinton)
So, why SHOULD Hillary quit NOW?
Who do you think will be leading after next Tuesday?
Hint – See below:
Combined population of Oregon, Montana and South Dakota = 5,173,438
Combined population of West Virginia, Kentucky and Puerto Rico = 8,086,459
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 14, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
CORRECTION:
The total figure of 8,086,459 DOES NOT include West Virginia.
Sorry about that.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 14, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
cindyct: If you were voting for the best candidate as you claim- you would not be voting for Obama.
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Which Democratic candidate is more electable?
Consider this:
This is how the Electoral College stands as of April 23, 2008, showing strengths of Clinton vs. Obama, based on their results. For those who have not understood, this is not a head-to-head matchup, but rather a side-by-side comparison.
This assumes a winner-take-all primary/caucus vote takes all Electoral votes for each state. The totals immediately below are WITHOUT any consideration of the states of Florida and Michigan.
Clinton 261
Obama 181
But with Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 305
Obama 181
Assuming the following victories, based on current polls, with Clinton winning Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Obama winning North Carolina, South Dakota, Oregon (which is doubtful), and Montana, the totals would then be, still without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 285
Obama 209
Even with a victory for Obama in Indiana, the totals would be, still without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 274
Obama 220
Please note that it takes 270 Electoral College votes to win the General Election.
Whether or not the vote turns out as indicated, I firmly believe the above analysis more than amply demonstrates which of the Democratic candidates is in a better position to be the stronger candidate in the General Election.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 14, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Kevin Rudd (PM Australia) says Iran and its warmongering and antisemitism must be confronted. iranian missile sent from gaza hit central israel today.
Do you really think Bawak is capable of confronting anything?
It took him 20 years to confront Rev Wright and only because he was forced to and it was not even face to face.
Posted by: al | May 14, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
How can the African American voters be racists when the only presidential candidates they have had to vote for before now have been white men????? Racists are usually those who REFUSE to accept someone of another color. The ones who said they would not vote for a minority no matter who that person is.
Posted by: Gayle | May 14, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
“In the general, all that matters is electoral votes. Obama has a weaker claim than Clinton, by that measure.”
Have you looked at the statewide polling? I can assure you that the superdelegates have. It’s available at several sources. You’ll find That Obama beats McCain in several states Bush won and that Hillary is toxic in several swing states. If your responses “well, that’s before the Republican machine tears him apart,” consider that at this point he has been the exclusive focus of both Republican (and Hillary’s) attacks, due to his front-runner/presumptive status. Republicans could paint Clinton as an out of touch, elitist, radical just as easily as they will attempt to do to Obama. Actually, it will be easier because such a large majority considers her untrustworthy.
Posted by: molaske | May 14, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Obama has no chance of beating McCain in November. Hillary will beat McCain in November so Hillary is the Best most electable Candidate period.
Posted by: Bob4USA | May 14, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Yavo, please send that to Howard Dean and do you mind if I sent it as well, and maybe spread it around some? Thanks, that was terrific!!
Posted by: justme2see | May 14, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Hill Will: I agree with you. The way that Hillary has been treated in the media will not be easily forgotten by her supporters.
Obama supporters and the news media think that this will all be forgotten in Novemeber.
We the women of the United States will get our revenge. You will see Mr., Obama (the made-to-order candidate), that it will be an uphill battle for you to win the presidential nomination.
We are either not going to vote or we will vote for McCain.
Revenge is SWEET!!!!!
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Darlene, yes, yes, yes, the only speech I want to hear from Obama is his concession speech, now or later, either will do.
Posted by: justme2see | May 14, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
The reality is that you CLINTON FOLKS DON’T CARE ABOUT THE PARTY!!! I READ these comments about Mrs. Clinton as if she is a VICTIM!!! IN the beginning of this process SHE WAS THE presumptive nominee, SHE HAD THE MAJORITY OF THE BLACK VOTE ( THE DEMOCRATIC PATY’s MOST LOYAL CONSTITUENCY – ASK BILL CLINTON – TWICE ELECTED BY OVERWHELMING MAJORITES OF BLACK FOLK.) WHAT HAPPENED???
Posted by: AGBI | May 14, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Folks, I don’t believe that African Americans are racist because they vote for Obama. I have been volunteering for Hillary’s campaign and they tell me that they would vote for her in November if she is the nominee. Many have opened up to me and said that they believe that she would make a better president but they need to support the AA candidate. They have a dilemma that has been fueled by the media. At the end I am sure that we will all come together and realize that this is not about race but who is best for our country.
Posted by: Robin | May 14, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
AGBE, speaking only for me, no, I don’t care about the party, not anymore. Not after having our party hijacked by the far left. You can have Obama and the democratic party.
Posted by: justme2see | May 14, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Winners and losers life goes on,can some tell mrs clinton presidency is not her birthright so that we can have peace.
Posted by: ed | May 14, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
sorne: you better get use to it. The women vote and the catholic vote are the swing voters. And guess what, Obama ain’t getting it.
Stick that in your “manly pipe” and smoke it!!!!
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
al….he was forced to “reject” the endorsement of Farrakahn too…by HILLARY at one of their debates. He tried to skirt it and not offend his racist militant black supporters, but his empty “denounce” was not believable. Wright and Farrakhan are birds of a feather.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Rick,
When does Wright’s book come out??? Has anyone bothered to ask him what the terms of his book deal are, exactly?
Also, what is going into Obama’s so-called victory speech on May 30?
Posted by: Which Great Lake is in Oregon? | May 14, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Obama thinks they speak “Arabic” in Afhanistan. Obama thinks we have 57 states! And this is a college educated man!!!
Is there really 57 states and it is classified and only Obama know?
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Debra: This is a story the media has once again skipped over to help their Obama favorite. Obama’s background is NOT “American” one of “faith”. Now the DNC is starting to say that we will all hear about Obama’s background! Well – he has things to hide that is why he stumbles and does not talk about how much he loved his Mother. But now the DNC will tell Obama what to say about his background and love of this country and groundedness in fgaith> HA! More lies from Obama.
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Obama is a far left socialist! Is this the man we want as President of the United States. Are we going to have Moveon.org; Farrahkahn. William Ayers, Axelrod, Jesse JAckson and AL Sharpton choose our president?
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Why do ABC journalists continue to coddle and protect the Clintons? As Camille Paglia points it:
Republican operatives have been salivating for Hillary to be the nominee. Her vainglorious claim to have been fully “vetted” is ludicrous. She and her husband left a mountain of manure in Little Rock and Washington that hasn’t even begun to be thrown. The mainstream media, despite its tilt toward Obama, has been amazingly protective of the Clintons during this campaign. Where were the chronologies of the voluminous Clinton scandals that voters (especially young ones) needed to evaluate Hillary’s professional judgment and character? That the conservative Washington Times has now begun to make document drops about Hillary’s stonewalling and duplicity (such as over the Rose Law Firm billing records) suggests that Republicans have concluded her candidacy is kaput.
Surely, given Hillary’s claim of expertise on the basis of her service as first lady, every major or ambiguous episode in her husband’s two presidencies should have been systematically reexamined by the media. I for one have renewed questions about the 1993 suicide of Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, Hillary’s former law partner and longtime friend, whose files were purged by Hillary’s staff before they could be examined for evidence. One must always be skeptical about Web rumors, but my interest was piqued last year by claims that Foster was shattered by the role he had played three months earlier in the outrageous order for federal agents to attack David Koresh’s ranch at Waco, Texas, producing a conflagration that led to 76 deaths, including 21 children. Why has the Waco fiasco been forgotten? It triggered the worst case of domestic terrorism in U.S. history, the 1995 revenge bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
See her entire column on Salon.
Posted by: Jane | May 14, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Cindy…Missouri voted BEFORE knowing all we now know about BO. He still had his new car smell and Americans were desperate to hear the words “Change”, and “Hope”….then we just heard “hate”, “U S of KKK”,& “God Damn America”, wife proud of country for 1st time, small town folks are bitter and cling to religion, etc. Missouri will not vote BO in Nov.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Jane, thanks but no thanks. Beating a dead horse toots. I seriously doubt that the right didn’t look under ever rock to find more on the Clintons. Get over it. A lot of tax payers money wasted on nothing. Typical GOP. Waste money on bogus accusations & then blow trillions on a war based on lies.
Lord bless this mess!
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
It’s about experience not race. I don’t know how Obama can win in Nov. obviously the swing states don’t buy what he is selling.
Posted by: Tina from Florida | May 14, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Interesting on Charlie Rose last night (of course pro BHO) they were talking VP possibilities. They said BHO needs some one that knows their way around Washington. I had a good laugh on that one. Not experienced to know the ins and outs of Washington. Pretty confident about his experience.
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Too much negativity ain’t going to change the maths. OBAMA has changed thre gameplan.The maths has put the nomination into his back pocket.
Superdelegates have started the mass exodus to Obama.
Obama is charting his election campaign strategy to heal the party. Mend the broken dreams and bring the party back on track.There you have it.
Hillary can now plan her exit strategy with honour.The maths declare that OBAMA wins.Superdelegates will go with the maths and the will of the people. Errol Smythe
Posted by: Errol Smythe | May 14, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Obama has lost the Reagan Democrats with the “bitter” speak and the good Rev. and they will not come back in the fall. He will lose the GE just like Kerry, Dukaukis, and Mondale, not because he is black, but because he can’t and won’t get there vote, just like the other losers. A 41 point lose at this stage of the primary season is down right embarassing, and he is heading for another next week. Oh yes he always has Oregon to make him feel better, he hopes….
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Here is the way I see it I am voting for Hillary because she is smart and I trust her and she is a woman, and maybe women will be protected better in this mean world she is making history in the image of me. AA are voting for Obama because he is smart they trust him and in this mean world maybe they will be proteceted better he is making history in thier own image. God knows these two groups of people have been abused since the begining of mankind. because we have had to fight to survive we are like beta fish.IMO powerful white men are playing games piting us against each other.
Posted by: Bishop | May 14, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Cindy,
Obama won Missouri 49 to 48, with 1% of the voters uncommitted and, as Debra points out, it was before Jeremiah Wright surfaced. Don’t count on Missouri in November. Clinton won rural areas in Missouri overwhelmingly.
Posted by: Robin | May 14, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Hillary Who? started this campaign
with a boast: her 35 years of (non)
experience.
If she doesn’t pack up and go home
now, she will end up with a debt
of 35 million.
Posted by: anon | May 14, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Too much negativity ain’t going to change the maths. OBAMA has changed thre gameplan.The maths has put the nomination into his back pocket.
Superdelegates have started the mass exodus to Obama.
Obama is charting his election campaign strategy to heal the party. Mend the broken dreams and bring the party back on track.There you have it.
Hillary can now plan her exit strategy with honour.The maths declare that OBAMA wins.Superdelegates will go with the maths and the will of the people. Errol Smythe
Posted by: Errol Smythe | May 14, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Jane, you’ve got to be kidding….Clinton’s being protected by ABC journalists and media? Like the journalists/news media haven’t been in the tank for Obama since day 1? They’ve been pushing the first viable black candidate since the beginning of this thing which is why Edwards dropped out so early…he had no chance. But Hillary, the first viable female was treated like crap from day one. If anyone can’t see sexism has less shame associated with it than racism, they’re on another planet. She is by far more capable, more deserving…..but let’s give it to the black guy, and look like the progressive democratic party that we are. Hello President McCain!
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
J. McCrank doesn’t have a ghost of
chance in November. The ancient
McCodger may as well concede
right now.
Posted by: anon | May 14, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Darlene….oh my god….I have never laughed so hard from a posting. I truly thank you from the bottom of my heart….really the best, and I needed the laugh. This political season is making me very tense.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Hi, Rick, thanks for sitting in.
It’s a shame more people aren’t pointing out what Obama’s loss means the way you have; most of the press is just glossing over it. People read the headlines and think this primary was unimportant but it’s not.
Posted by: Vnd | May 14, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Errol Smythe….what is “maths”?
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Oh Jane…Why do we have to suffer the thoughts and ramblings of Camille. I live in Philly and have to here her students recant the dribble she imparts to them.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
It’s interesting that even though Obama got two Super D’s today, Hillary got one (as usual, I expected a push on superd’s for him whenever she does well). What really comforts me though, is that a pledged super d can change their mind and their votes don’t count until the convention….a pledge is not a locked in deal. So all the super d’s have until August to switch if so inclined. They should really sit the rest of this out until Puerto Rico votes. We are not impressed with their trickling over to BO.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
J. McCrank will crank up the
war. He thinks the economy
is overheated and wants to
crank it down.
The confused codger lives in
the past and will be no good
for the country.
Posted by: anon | May 14, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I still say Hillary should finish the primaries, take KY. and PR with huge margins and then run as a Independent Dem. She can put Obama on the left and McCain on the right, and run straight down the middle. Hillary can get federal funding along with her supporters who would be energized to see the first Independent “and” Female President, she can beat both of them in the GE. Electing an Independent Woman would be the biggist change this country has seen in a long… long time.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
The only thing Hillary has in common with blue collar white folks in w. virginia is the color of her skin which she is exploiting to her advantage.
Let’s face it, some white folk will not vote for a black man if their life depended on (especially in W.VA, Indiana, Penn & Kentucky) where you have few people of color. These people have not been exposed to the pleasures of diversity.
On the other hand Barack has won other white states with no problem simply becuase those states had more and better educated whites. I really don’t think he has the problem it’s they (blue-collar/uneducated whites) are ones with the problem.
IMHO, I’ve been luck to have the pleasures of meeting and living among many diverse communities that it really makes the world a better exciting place.
Posted by: Wake-Up America | May 14, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Debra: I agree with you. The only consolation we have is that the Superdelegates will change their minds after the last primary in June; and if Hillary looks more electable than Obama (which she will look), they can switch over to her.
I think we will see a surge of Supers going to, or switching over to Hillary once they learn that Obama is not electable without the lower income, middle class worker, including the catholics and the jewish vote that is going heavily to Hillary.
I will say this again: the older women vote, the catholic vote, the hispanic vote, the lower, middle income voter and the Jewish voter……HILLARY SUPPORTERS!!!!!!
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Jim: Right on! I love your idea! Let’s get it over to Hillary!!!!!
That would be so awesome if she won the presidency after all the crap the media has given Hillary, running on an Independent Ticket.
Your right! She is the only candidate that is running down the middle!!!!
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
It appears that hillarys biggest supporter see the writing on the wall. Why can’t you see it.
Let’s analyze what Gov. Rendell of PA said:
“If Senator Obama becomes our nominee and he wants someone to carry the Clinton banner there’s no question in my mind he should ask Hillary Clinton,” Rendell told CNN’s Kyra Phillips.
He sounds like he’s becoming a reasonabl man and what he is really saying is that I will support the democrats whoever the nominee is?
Posted by: Wake-Up America | May 14, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I really hope the Clinton campaign considers the idea. I am getting the impression that she really does not have a great future in the Democratic party. Harry Reid is going no where anytime soon, so I say go for it. Also if Bob Barr runs,…McCain would be even easier to beat.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Jim,
you are not along in that thought. A recent Rasmussen poll shows that 29% of democrats want her to run as an independent if she is not the nominee:
The hijacking of the Democratic Party by the far left and the poor judgement of the Party leaders have alienated too many people in this Primary season.
Posted by: Robin | May 14, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
While all the dems are still fighting over Who won the primary, President McCain will be picking Supreme Court Judges
Posted by: bubba2 | May 14, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Robin.. interesting pole, It would be a hard choice for Hillary to make, but I really think that she could win even if the election has to go to the House to decide.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I actually just heard a “journalist” excuse Obama’s 57 States remark by saying that he’s fatigued and this is why this race needs to end – so he can rest up for the General Election.
We all remember how upon returning from his Easter holiday, Obama said that this primary had been “like the Bataan Death March.”
Does he think this is the hard part? Does he think serving as POTUS is easier than this?
Hillary isn’t tired; she’s just getting warmed up!
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 14, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Of course the Democrats who supported Clinton will have to support Obama. Fortunately, we voters don’t have any such career allegiances to uphold. How sweet it is!
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 14, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Running down McCain isn’t making Obama look any better. In fact, it’s just reinforcing the fact that I could never support a man who inspires such blind hatred among his followers.
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 14, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Jim,
I have been thinking about it for a long time. She has no future in the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party has no future itself being owned by the far left. She has a good agenda for America. That is what we should care about.
Posted by: Robin | May 14, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
If Obama wins, it will not be with the popular vote but by stealing the election. Obama pledged $20 million to help the superdelegates in the next election and getting elected again is more important than what is best for America. Obama wins by dirty politics. If Florida and Michigan voters voices are not counted, there should be a rebellion against the dictator Obama. He cares more for those people who live in gov. housing, using food stamps and drugs and having a baby a year on tax payers dollars. He does not care for the White families who work hard and live within their means. He is a far left liberal/socialist.
Posted by: Mary | May 14, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Racists surrounded by mountains is the recipe for the 41% win; they don’t even venture outside, nor do others venture there: mine pits are not exactly resort places for visit, especially if you know that the locals are not hospitable to colored people. Check out other mountainous areas: fascists still survive in the Alps (in Austria and Switzerland), for ex.
Posted by: alindra | May 14, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Pastor James Manning of Harlem just stated that Barack Hussein Obama has pimped the media into thinking that he could be our president. He says all the players: Rev.Jeremiah Wright, Rev. Al SHarpton, Jesse Jackson, Oprah Winfrey and Barack Hussein Obama are all in this together to get control of the Whitehouse. Obama has promised lots and lots to these players. I wonder what they all have under their sleeves. And according to the Pastor, Mr. Axelrod is the organizer behind this all.
Posted by: norm | May 14, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
I find it disturbing how “tired” and worn out Obama is from this primary. He is in his 40′s! and Hillary is 60 and the energy level is all on her side. He does not appear to have the fight, motivation and passion to give all that is needed to be the President of this country. Especially with the many crisis attacking us on all fronts. This should not be the time for Obama. Eight years from now- maybe.
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Robin…I agree with you entirely, if the Obama team (kennedy, kerry, pelosi) gets there way, the goverment would swing to far left. We just had to go thru 8 years of neocon right, I for one would like to see a true Independent President who could preside without a party to answer to.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
HoosierSue…you’re right about running McCain down…and they really will when they try to play young guy – old guy. Sorry, it just won’t work. I’ll be a “McCain Democrat”, before EVER voting Obama. I really hope Hillary does not run as his VP, (though I don’t see them offering it to her). I can’t vote for BO even if Hillary is on the ticket to clean him up.
I am watching my local ABC news here in L.A. and of course, they mention BO’s 2 supers he picked up today. NO MENTION OF HILLARY’S ONE. Nothing new there with media coverage…I’ll switch to FOX.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Norm…I just wish Rev. Al would pay his taxes.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Has anyone else noticed how the Republicans are getting really aggravated with McCain, because they feel that he is moving too much to the left. I think if McCain continues to move to the middle, he defintely will get alot of the Hillary votes which would cetainly give him a huge edge in the general election. It is not at all oout of reach for McCain to win the nomination per Hillary supporters whom felt they got cheated by not having their candidate as the democratic nominee.
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
darlene..That why Hillary should run as a Independent, take votes from Obama and McCain and win.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Obama is running as a Democrat, he is using the Democratic Party, not because he repects the Party but because it might get him elected. He should really run as a Marxist, his true political affilination. He has fooled far too many Americans and America will pay for being fooled. His resume is vacant of any real political decisions that helped the average American family but it is full of give-aways to irresponsible people. He has no idea how to overcome our problems of jobs and economy.
Posted by: Mia | May 14, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Obama made the idiotic housing comment about that we are now in a depression because of the housing problems.
He says we have 57 states.
They speak Arabic in Afghanistan
Canada has a president, not a Prime Minister.
Intelligently spoken from Obama’s lips!!!
Posted by: maggie | May 14, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I would like to see HIllary run as an Independant if she does not get the Democratic nomination. However, I would then fear that her effectiveness in the whitehouse would be hampered by a resentful demcratic party.
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Alindra…don’t slam the small town people of WVA and call them racists. Just because BO wins 95% of black vote and wins big in heavily populated black states…won’t get him to the WH. I live in L.A. and would never vote for him, not due to his skin color. Many of the people you slam are the backbone of this country and the determinors of an election.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
I sure hope the “political genius” of the Clintons is working overtime! Mistakes made in the early part of the campaign have been hurtful to her success. I hope they can salvage this and really make this an historical event!
Posted by: this election counts | May 14, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
the election counts…Oh the Dems would work with her I’m sure. Alot of republicans would work with her also, I think they could get more done with an Independent in office.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
this election,
This nomination race has demonstrated how dysfunctional the Democratic Party is anyway. I wouldn’t worry about them. She is the most competent presidential candidate and she should go as an independent. Better her as an independent than John McCain.
Posted by: Robin | May 14, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
this election counts: First thing she should do is get that B**** Pelosi out. She is so jealous of HIllary, she would do everything in her power to let Hillary look bad.
Hillary should get rid of all the democrates in congress.
Secondly, give Richardson, Kennedy and Obama chauffeur duties driving her around; “Driving Miss Hillary”! Oh! yeah, also “Driving Miss Billy, too”!
Posted by: maggie | May 14, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
The “Messiah” Obama has lost his charm many,many moons ago.
He is now an embarrassment to this country.
His good friend and neighbor William Ayers stomps on the AMerican flag; and now Mr. Obama is wearing an american flag lapel pin, after the photo of his friend Ayers is all over the news station showing this friend of his Ayers, stomping on the American flag.
Good timing Obama, you FAKE!!!!
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Obama and McCain are both sitting ducks for a third contender to run straight down the middle, and Hillary Clinton is poised to to be the person who could do it and win. I really hope she takes a shot at. I would rather see her try and fail than languish in the Democratic party.
Posted by: Jim | May 14, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
maggie….I love it and you too!!!
Posted by: justme2see | May 14, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Can anyone explain to me, how we little people, whom are just common folk voters, can see what is going on here. But intelligent people like the Superdelegates keep crooning Obama, when they know very well that he will not win, without the white vote, the older female vote, the catholic vote and the jewish vote.
Do they really think that the Hillary supporters will go over to Obama in the General Election!
What has Obama and Axelrod promised these superdelegates. It has to be lots and lots of monies!!!! and high positions!!!!
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Justme2see: Thank you and I love you too!!!!!!!
Posted by: maggie | May 14, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I feel quite sad for the Democratic party. The leadership is locked in a primary process that has become something of a joke. It is pretty well acknowledged that Obama gamed the primary system, where the delegates awarded in a caucus state, where 20,000 people voted, equaled the delegates awarded in a primary state, where 300,000 people voted. Obama’s young voters, with lots of time on their hands, were able to dominate the caucuses to assure large margins for him. Nobody believes that the caucuses are in any way reflective of how people will vote in the general election. Witness Texas, where Hillary won the popular vote, but Obama got more delegates because he won the caucuses. Not only that, many of the big wins were in Red states.
Of course, it goes without saying that Michigan and Florida are fiascos. The fact that the Democratic leadership thought it was OK to exclude them simply says that these people have not got a thimble full of brains between them.
Because the delegate count is not reflective of Democratic voters in the general election, Obama is much weaker than his delegate count would indicate.
So, what we have is a clearly weak candidate in Obama, who is likely to win the nomination and then lose the general election. Not only will he be a weak candidate, but if he happens to win the presidency he will be the most inexperienced president we have ever had. It is scary to think of handing the keys to the government to him and his crowd of inexeperienced academics.
The superdelegates can change this result by handing Hillary the nomination, but they are quite understandibly scared to death of going against the so-called will of the people, as reflected in the elected delegate count. This is so even though the current delegate count does not reflect the will of the people, but reflects a seriously flawed primary process. The SDs may be afraid that if they hand the nomination to Hillary, Black people will, at best, stop voting for Democrats, or at worst riot in Denver. Maybe they are right. Maybe the best thing in the long run is to let Obama have his shot, if nothing else, to mollify the Black vote.
However, the SDs must realize that by catering to the Black vote and the extreme left wing of the Democratic party, they risk alienating a large number of blue collar voters. Bill Clinton, for all of his faults, managed to move the Democratic party to the center, where it has to be in order to win the presidency. Gore and Kerry pulled the party to the left, and lost. Obama is likely to pull the party to the extreme left, and the blue collar votes he loses may abandon the Democractic party for a generation, making it impossible for any Democrat to win the presidency.
Posted by: David H | May 14, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Obama doesn’t need the white people. He doesn’t need the women vote. He doesn’t need the jewish vote. He doesn’t need the Catholic vote.He doesn’t need the hispanic vote. Yes, he doesn’t need all these votes, because he is “THE MESSIAH”!!!!!
God will see to it that Obama will win, because Farrahkhan said that God has brought him to us, he is the Messiah!!!!!
Obama does not need votes because he will be anointed.He is the Messiah!!!!
Posted by: norm | May 14, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
darlene…they took off your hysterical comment about BO in his jeans and how Michelle better worry about him showing off…and then you barfed. LOL. Anyway…the only thing we can do, as it seems BO’s nom has everything to do with money….is to make our voices heard LOUDLY in Nov. by working to elect McCain. I can’t wait until they review those exit polls to see mass exodus of Hillary Dems to McCain.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
debra: Yes, it is true!!!! When I saw Obama on the you tube video showing off his A** in those K-Mart Jeans, I wanted to throw up.
He even posed for them with his leg on the arm rest so the female reporters could get a better look.
He was having the time of his life. Michelle, be careful, you husband is an Exhibionist!!!!!
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
David H…you’re brilliant and summed it up completely and concisely. But I am still holding out they won’t just hand it to Obama on a platter. I want an ugly struggle for it, to strengthen McCain’s chances. I cannot stomach the thought of BO and his wife in the WH. Can you imagine extra tax payers $$ to pay for his posse of Secret Service? They will have to triple whatever has been spent in the past.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
I don’t care how they label me, I VOW to not vote for Obama for anything, especially not President of the United States of America.
Posted by: justme2see | May 14, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Darlene you have me laughing again. I really wanted to re-read your first post about his showing off, I literally almost wet my pants, which is why they took it off the blog. Love your sense of humor.
By the way, saw a bit of Hillary on CNN with Wolf and the interview looks great. He asked her about Chelsea’s role in all of this and she got really choked up, as a mother would with pride, and I bet they jump all over her for tearing up. She can’t do anything right. Keep the faith and let’s keep our eyes on that strutting, arrogant excuse of a candidate.
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Great…Howard Dean is announcing today about a joint fund raising commitment for both candidates and CNN says they will get into it later. WHAT?
Posted by: Debra | May 14, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Debra: I agree with you. We need to keep the faith. I truly believe that something is going to happen. I don’t know what it is yet. But for some reason I believe that the Republicans and the Clintons know something, we don’t know yet, about this Obama character.
I think the Clintons and the Republicans are saving it for the last minute, which will turn this whole election around.
There is something out there, that is very serious, that has to do with Obama.
Everyone is just sitting tight until the time is right!!!!
Posted by: darlene | May 14, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I don’t understand why he neglected WV even though majority population is white but Hillary campaigned so hard in NC even she knows majority population is AA.
Atleast she tried.
Maybe that’s different between Obama and Hillary.
She is tougher than him.
Posted by: catleya | May 14, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
I just read this in regard to the loss of the support of blue collar voters in WV, and what it means for the general election: “You just can’t abstract from primary voters to general election voters — and all of her [Clinton's]voters are going to vote for him [Obama],” said Jim Jordan, a Democratic consultant who is supporting Mr. Obama.
Could the Obama people be that dumb? I, for one, voted for Hillary and will vote for McCain if Obama gets the nod. I am a centrist voter, and both Hillary and McCain are centrist candidates. Obama is a creature of the Far Left. Hillary’s approach to governing was proved during the Clinton years, so she is my first choice. McCain is second best, to be sure, but he will likely govern to the left of Bush. At any rate, he will not be a captive of the Far Right nutbags. Obama is the riskiest choice. His lack of experience will allow him to be manipulated by his Far Left backers, and will leave him uncertain in a crisis. His tepid patriotism will cause him to put the interests of other countries ahead of those of the America. He will focus on the needs of young voters, Blacks, the well educated, and the affluent — i.e., his base. Blue collar voters would be insane to vote for him.
Posted by: David H | May 14, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
This is a case that
The people against the party.
The eccentric party has their mind fixed and is working against the people. The whole nomination procedures are by and large incredibly disoriented. Party leaders seem to ignore the rules. Superdelegates come out to tell people to vote rather than listening and hearing.
The death of democracy in the democratic party. Let’s see if they receive their punishment in the general election.
There is no reason to support a candidate which is not by the people, of the people and for the people. They may say what they want but people always know better what these politicians are playing. The people don’t buy what the sly politicians sell.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 14, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Well, I know what I’m not hearing from Obama… neither sincerity nor capability.
Posted by: Mary | May 14, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Many people said Bill Clinton was nothing but a governor from a small state, had no experience, was a far left candidate and would ruin america, but he did ok. So why is it that we can’t afford Obama the same opportunity, after all he won fair and square by playing by the rules that everyone played by.
Posted by: fool me once | May 14, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Go sit down and read a book, Darlene
Posted by: evelyn | May 14, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Carl Rove and the GOP know that they have two chances of taking the White House. One is to run a campaign of subtle racist aimed at the largest voting group in the country, white Americans without college degree. I doubt Reverand Wrights rants go very well with the rhis large voting block.
I could see Obama losing key battle ground states, like Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia costing the Democrats the White House.
The Gop will also use Obama’s connection to Sryian born Antoin Rezco who is on trial right now in Chicago. Tony Rezco was a very good friend of Obama and they worked together on projects. Will something come out that can incriminate or embarrass him.
who
Posted by: CJbushwacker | May 14, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
In Hillary Who? you have a petty,
miserable and exhausting loser.
Posted by: anon | May 15, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
if ove 90% of Blacks vote their color , What is keeping the Whites from doing the same????those who cry Wolf are NOT always the Victims…..I will vote Mc Cain , no doubt , and I hope white people will do the same , not because of racism but just to help correct the imbalance and injustice that have fallen on Hillary ….Go Hillary , go Mc Cain08…
Posted by: alohaone | May 15, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Somebody please explain a 92% of the black vote for Obama.
Why do we accuse the white race of racism if Obama does not get majority of their vote and nothing is said of the over 92% of the black vote for Obama?
Posted by: SO | May 15, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Remember, all of the MSM and Obama supporters wanted Hillary to roll over and play dead even after the Iowa caucus. That just shows how crazy these folks are.
What an audacity.
Posted by: Sam | May 15, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
America is truly amazing. Only in America can you get a college education and never be a racist. It is magic, the college degree is your proof you are and never will be a racist. LOL
Posted by: HP Boston | May 15, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm