By Saira Anees

May 30, 2008 1:25pm

Archdiocese of Chicago Hammers Father Pfleger

Cardinal Francis George of the Archdiocese of Chicago just issued this statement about Father Michael Pfleger’s ridicule of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton in a sermon at the church of Sen. Barack Obama, Trinity United Church of Christ, on Sunday:

"The Catholic Church does not endorse political candidates.  Consequently, while a priest must speak to political issues that are also moral, he may not endorse candidates nor engage in partisan campaigning.

"Racial issues are both political and moral and are also highly charged. Words can be differently interpreted, but Fr. Pfleger’s remarks about Senator Clinton are both partisan and amount to a personal attack.  I regret that deeply.

"To avoid months of turmoil in the church, Fr. Pfleger has promised me that he will not enter into campaigning, will not publicly mention any candidate by name and will abide by the discipline common to all catholic priests."

I just have to say, as someone of faith, I have never before heard a cleric engage in such disdainful mockery from a pulpit. Have you?

- jpt

User Comments

Mesquito:
Because he threw Reverend Wright under the bus after 20 years of spiritual mentorship, right along with his “white” grandmother.
Not that the TUCC cares about his grandmother.

Posted by: SandyB | May 30, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

It’s unfortunate that Rev. Pfleger used the pulpit to discuss Hillary. However, I believe what he said is TRUE.
Senator Obama should not be blamed or have to reject Rev. Pfleger because of his comments. Rev. Pfleger is an aquaintance not a friend of Senator Obama’s. Senator Obama is not responsible for the moral attitudes of everyone!
HOW IS IT THAT EVERY TIME SOMEONE SPEAKS AT TRINITY CHURCH IT HITS THE MEDIA. IS SOMEONE PLANTED AT THE CHURCH? That is a disgrace.
Has anyone been planted at HAGEE’S CHURCH?
Let’s show some common sense.

Posted by: Shay | May 30, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Obama’s two spiritual advisors (his term, not mine) are racist, and he has been endorsed by known terrorists, anti-Semites, and international sponsors of terror. I was a Democrat. I am now voting for McCain. I have never been so alienated by a candidate.

Posted by: DriventoJohn | May 30, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Well, we all have to “feel better” knowing that the church of the higher ups doesn’t agree with this hateful misogynist priest “campaigning” on church time. It’s interesting that neither this statement nor the statement for Obama mentioned a repudiation of the hateful misogyny.
I guess that part was ok. Oh, that’s right, this “a church”…

Posted by: AmazonTraveler | May 30, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Gosh. the PRIEST is promising not to CAMPAIGN for Obama.
Isn’t it part of churches not paying taxes that they stay out of politics?
Let alone openly mock and denigrate presidential candidates.
Inexcusable. Way to unite, not divide, eh?

Posted by: clbrune | May 30, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

“That hate hadn’t gone away”….”white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”
Barack Hussein Obama from
Dreams Of My Father
Obama’s own words….
Is Obama going to
DENOUNCE HIS OWN WORDS?

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 30, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Shay -
You’re wrong. He has known Obama for over 20 years. He was part of the campaigns spiritual/Catholic outreach. He was on Obama’s website until he got scrubbed the other day.
Busiest people in Obama’s campaign must be the scrubbers.

Posted by: kris | May 30, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Once again one of Obama’s associates reflect a trend that is extremely disturbing and it appears that this obivous red flag will seem invisible as to becoming a concern for the Democratic Party. While I’m no expert on human behavior, it is mostly true that people are usually drawn to people that are similar to themselves…this can be seen in small children all the way up to the elderly folks on the planet. Senator Obama can denouce these associations all he wants but the fact remains that under the surface this man is not a uniter for ALL the people of America. It’s so disappointing to reflect on the millions of voters who supported Obama coming to the realization that they made the wrong choice. Slowly the realization that Obama has more than one face is coming to light. Take heart Obama supporters, all is not lost though, because if Obama gets the Democratic nomination, Senator McCain will surely be the next president, at least with McCain you know what you’re getting. I just hope that Clinton will stand firm and refuse to be joined with Obama on a ticket as the “Democratic attempt” to save their wrong choice (Obama). I am so glad I’m a registered Independent.

Posted by: ard | May 30, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Obama is tricky, he used his pastors like Rev.Wright and Father Pfleger to blast Mrs. Clinton.
Why Obama even put these ministers as his religious advisers in his campaign? After these pastors made some intolerant remarks then he threw him out the bus.
I am one of many Indonesian for NOBAMA

Posted by: Putri Soetopo | May 30, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

endorsed by terrorists
as opposed to a guy who silicates endorsements from a preacher who thinks katrina was an act of god to wipe out homosexuals, or that the holocaust was gods will
or the fact that while he may not have been endorsed by terrorists, his campaign officials sure lobbied our goverment for those terrorist and rogue nations
does that reflect poorly on mccain?
it should if you are going to say these things about obama, then it must reflect negatively on mccain

Posted by: bhrandon | May 30, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

HMMM….THIS PRIEST MUST HAVE HIT ON SOME TRUTHS!!!!!!!SOME OF US DO NOT WHANT TO BE REMINDED OF OUR FAULTS!!

Posted by: KEEPITREAL | May 30, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I finally saw the Pfleger video and I have to say I am shocked. Obama claims his church has a new pastor. His new pastor seems to countenance speakers in the pulpit who are bent on fanning the flames of race hatred. This does not seem to be much of a change from Wright. Apparently, Obama is not going to denounce this church and what it appears to stand for.
This is simply outrageous. And, to think Obama sat in that church for 20 years. One can only guess what he has planned for us all.
I am still waiting to see the video of Michelle Obama screaming “**** whitey” from the pulpit. That should just about complete the picture.

Posted by: David H | May 30, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

How about fool and a racist. I think Obama has lied so much about his life (see his latest fiction about his uncle, oops, great uncle, who liberated Auschwitz, oops Buchenwald and stayed in attic for 6 months) that he doesn’t even know himself what is true or not. He makes up a story for whatever group he is in front of. The man has no solid identity, or policies. He should be nicknamed the chameleon candidate. He is hard to defend against because he holds tightly to no position. If he states something, he is sure to backtrack on it later. His policy on meeting foreign leaders is now essentially the same as the one he derided Hillary for during the early debates. Please, make this fraud go away?

Posted by: Bill Worcester | May 30, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Get the religion to hell out of politics,.Has no place I don’t give a —- where or when either of them go to church Not my issue…..

Posted by: NH voter | May 30, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

This mockery was reprehensible and shocking.Such words sound more like a poor third rate comedian’s rant than a pastor.Shameful.Obama needs to denounce the insults thrown at Hillary not a glossed over statement about past and present and unity.

Posted by: vic | May 30, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Just a HAIL MARY what bs I am sure the archbishop is getting his cut also

Posted by: Bishop | May 30, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

I’m tired of people sticking up for Obama when all of his nutty friends keep spewing their hate. He has known these people for a long time, and there isn’t just one nutty friend, there is a long list of them. I’m sorry, but the company you keep DOES say a lot about you. You can’t tell me Sen. Obama has never seen or heard Ayres, Wright, Phleger, Moss, Rezko, and who knows how many others speak or rant their radical ideas and behaviors before, especially since he has known many of them well for years. How in the world has this man continued to hang onto his support, let alone gain support, with all of HIS baggage? People are apparently getting stupider by the day, or just plain don’t care what kind of person represents our country anymore. Rev. Phleger is just another on a long list of reasons why many will never, or cannot in good conscience, ever vote for Sen. Obama. If not Clinton, then McCain, at least his true values and character haven’t been hidden from the American people and aren’t guesswork.

Posted by: DWC | May 30, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

NOW can we call the TUCC a “hate church”?

Posted by: mesquito | May 30, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Senator Obama has said this is not his viewpoint or the way he conducts business. It is not what he is about.
He doesn’t control what folks get up and say. It wasn’t too dignified coming from a priest, but yes, I have heard mockery like this before. I sat in stunned disbelief and made my exit as soon as possible. Most of the congregation did the same thing. It was also about Hillary and it was way before anyone had heard of Obama. So, it does happen. Sometimes even good people say stupid things.
And this priest, wright, maybe they are just afraid. After all, if Barack does unite us, then these guys are out of a job. After all, it is hard to rail at the man if you are the man.
However, I have heard and read some pretty hard hits against Senator Obama and I have never heard him complain about it. He says he knew it would be tough and he has taken some tough hits. That is the nature of the game. This blog alone has been full of racist unfounded hatred and more lies than can be repeated. Yet, we still have those that say Hillary has been the victim of sexism. That Barack has an “unfair” advantage being black. Boy, that is a new one isn’t it? Wouldn’t Fredrick Douglas love to hear that one?
Hillary comes out and says, I’m tough enough, I’m smart enough, I have experience, I am the best and then follows that with I am the victim of sexism. Seems she wants to remind us that she is a woman and should be treated “fairer”. Sort of pathetic. Barack has always said that if he loses it is because he didn’t run the best campaign. No whining about it.
Yep, the pastors need to hush. Will they? Probably not. Why? Because they are human and also want their 15 minutes of fame.

Posted by: Annoyed | May 30, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

I am an Obama supporter and I am Catholic. I am very glad the archdiocese BLAST Pfleger. His comment was divisive, HATEFUL and just plain STUPID.
It not only hurt Hillary but it hurt Obama and the Catholic church.
SHAME ON HIM.

Posted by: Brandon | May 30, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

anyone with a brain knows this would hurt Obama. How much did Hillary pay him?

Posted by: sceptical | May 30, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Now the GOP priest that blasted Obama should also be ridiculed by his archdiocese.
I think that the clergy should REFRAME from such STUPID comments.

Posted by: Brandon | May 30, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

So Obama knows a Catholic priest. What’s the big deal? It was the PRIEST who gave the disgraceful rant against Hillary from the pulpit of a Protestant church he was VISITING, NOT Obama. Throughout this campaign Obama has avoided making personal attacks against his opponent. It is unreasonable and unfair to make Obama accountable for the statements of others outside the campaign and unauthorized by the candidate to speak for him.

Posted by: nanameow | May 30, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

OBAMA/WRIGHT = WRONG!
Obama keeps saying he does not agree with Wright – BUT – he is still a member of that church – WHY??? He needs to leave!
After 20 years there – he must believe some of what was taught – even some is just too much for me.
Wright’s attitude is “us against them” – “Us” being Black People “Them” being White people -
this is not the message Obama talks about. Is this all for show – tells us what we want to hear?
I do not like the comment from Wright – “Obama says what he has to – he is a Politician”!
This is not a good message for someone who wants to be the President of the UNITED States.
Wright has caused major harm to Obama’s campaign, and it will never go away.

Posted by: Molly | May 30, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

You can tell a a lot about a person by the company he keeps. Obama sure has a lot of suspicious crony’s. How in the world can he successfully extricate himself from his shabby past with religious nuts and gangsters. Not to detract from the heavy-handed way he got into the senate.
Answer: He can’t. Dreamers only believe he can.

Posted by: Thomas | May 30, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

All of this hate being spread–and in God’s House.
If you listen to more of the video it wasn’t just an attack on Hillary, but all white people.
Obama either has terrible judgement or he believes it too. How else could he listen for 20 years?
I’ll never vote for him…

Posted by: cindy in nc | May 30, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Obama is pure crud. His followers are purely blind. They don’t even know what the man stands for. For that mater, neither does anyone else.

Posted by: Soetoro No! | May 30, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

I am a Catholic and all of these outrageous men of God are completely…crazy. I have never ONCE seen or heard this sort of distasteful, idiotic crap that is so…political. If this is what goes on in some churches, I really fear for those parents that bring their young kids to sermons. It is divisive and I wonder if Obama’s daughters have learned anything from TUCC. To imagine his innocent girls being taken to Reverand Wright’s sermons is completely unthinkable.

Posted by: rachel | May 30, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Obama is SHOCKED! SHOCKED I say! That all these people from chicago that he has gotten pork for, and accepted political help from are somehow saying these disparaging things!

Posted by: bob | May 30, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Look, The IRREVERENT Wright is what he is but the fact is he is not the only issue Barack has difficulty with. Barack has several assoicates that are just awful to include, Wright, Rexkp, Ayers, Odinga, etc. He has a wife that seems to be ashamed of America. He refuses to wear a lapel pin saying he doesn’t want to take sides. And what’s worse is his far left agenda.
He’s simply a bad candidate and I think everyone is aware of that now.

Posted by: DB | May 30, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

It is priest like this hat give the Catholic Church a bad name.All mankind has a free will it’s a shame some don’t know how to use it for the good of all.
No to Obama.
Yes to Hillary!!

Posted by: slokipoki | May 30, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Throw Obama overboard.

Posted by: Snapper | May 30, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Next thing you know, he’ll deny remembering Larry Sinclair.

Posted by: Thomas | May 30, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

The problem is, Obama is running for President and we Americans not only evaluate their experience but judgement. Unfortunately, Barack seems to have neither

Posted by: DB | May 30, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Where the hell is Barry Lynn and Americans United for Separation of Church and State? Oh yeah – forgot: Trinity is a UCC church so the rules don’t apply.
Hypocrite.

Posted by: Patrick | May 30, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I am watching this hateful man perform in front of his cheering crowd again, here on FOX, and am disgusted as much by the performance as by the parishioners. My predicton…Obama Speech III. He will now denouce, reject, distance himself from beloved Trinity. They took Pfleger off Obama’s website yeserday as an advisor to his campaign. How many more whitey haters will Obama have to ditance himself from? Michelle would be rather hard to extricate himself from. Why do they not think their young daughters deserve to hear better from a church? Change, Unity…..What? The reason Obama will not be elected in November…plain and simple = Wright/Trinity. Followed by inexperience.

Posted by: Debra | May 30, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I believe that Rev Wright and Barack Obama are one in the same in their beliefs! I do believe that Rev Wright is saying what Barack believes in but does not want the USA to get! As a citizen of the United States I fear for this country if Barack Obama wins the Dem Primary.

Posted by: Jean, OKC | May 30, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Thanks to Obama, Pfleger’s Church received over $ 225000.00 from the State of IL……this is the kind of Legislation Obama oversaw during his rise in Chicago…..
Who’s the MAN in Pfleger’s Church—-
While Obama was on the board of the Wood’s Fund with Ayers, They gave 40000.00 to Wright’s Church…..
(plus Obama’s own Offering of 26000.00 a year)
Who’s the MAN in Wright’s Church—–
“That hate hadn’t gone away”….”white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”
Barack Hussein Obama from
Dreams Of My Father

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 30, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Dump Obama. He should be impeached!
He is a total fake and Rev Wright says exactly what Obama listened to — and agreed with — for 20 years.
Are we really supposed to believe today that Obama doesn’t agree with Black liberation Theology about White Hatred? Barack signed the pledge.
He is rotten and un-american. A racist thru & thru.
throw him under the bus!

Posted by: NH Free Voice | May 30, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Obama has more feeling for the Islamic terrorists than he does his fellow Americans!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | May 30, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Too much of the same for it to be a coincidence. Obama, guilty of deception!

Posted by: Thomas | May 30, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

As if obama and his hateful wife aren’t a problem enough..here is the reverend that he was hoping would never come to light..now front and center confirming the so called snippet sound bites are actually the way of life in this church….where do they get off having a BLACK church and not just a CHURCH in the United States of America…welcoming all

Posted by: Mary B | May 30, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Anyone notice that members of Trinity love to jump up and down when they hear anti-white remarks.
THAT IS A HUGE PROBLEM FOR OBAMA. HE IS A MEMBER OF THAT CHURCH.

Posted by: John | May 30, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

This priest has nothing to do with the Obama campaign and his comments are not racist! How can a white man be racist against another white person? Look up the meaning of racist before you call someone racist. His comments don’t come close to Hillary’s comment of “RFK Assassination” last week hoping Obama gets killed so she can win the nomination. All of Clinton supporters are trying to find any little thing to try to change the rules so she can win this nomination. But I got news for you, it won’t work…period. Your candidate will lose and that’s the bottomline. Hillary Clinton and some of her supporters are the worst people I have ever heard support a candidate. You guys are the most divisive, complaining, uneducated people I have ever had the displeasure to hear. Campaign politics or not, grow up and be adults and conduct yourselves with some amount of dignity. COME ON!

Posted by: Bishop9109 | May 30, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I will never ever vote for Barack Obama, even if he is the last democrat on earth.

Posted by: J.J. | May 30, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Wait until you hear Rev James Meeks. He’s one of the triumverate of “spiritual advisors” Obama has relied upon to get elected in Chicago. Obama is a crass opportunist who didn’t mind listening to these fruitcakes’ racist drivel for years as long as they served his purpose.
Pfleger should be excommunicated for actively supporting a pro-abortion candidate.

Posted by: SAM | May 30, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Bishop9109
There’s too much evidence to be ignored. Obama is a racist. Simple!

Posted by: Thomas | May 30, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Anyone else find it incredible that the Archdiocese condemned the “personal attack,” but not the “whitey” attack?
Believe it or not, I could live with Rev. White’s opinions. They were angry, but not hateful.
Pfleger has enraged me. He should be removed from the pulpit. He’s divisive and unChristian.
Nice slap on the wrist, Archdiocese. How about a meaningful comment?

Posted by: Chris | May 30, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Rev. Michael Pfleger was on Obama’s campaign staff to boot.

Posted by: J.J. | May 30, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Yes, I have heard other clerics engage in such disdainful mockery from a pulpit. Racist Rev. Wright did from THE SAME CHURCH. They (those sitting in that church ) obviously hate white people, Bill and Hill included. They make me sick. That church alone has set race relations back decades.

Posted by: Vickie | May 30, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Exactly Chris, I am O.K. with Rev Pfleger personal opinion of Hillary.
I am aghast at his race attacks & race baiting.
Obama has been a member of this type of stuff for 20+ years. I truely believe he feels “disenfranchised” by “white people”.
We need a uniter not a divider like Obama.

Posted by: John | May 30, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Myself and my entire family are changing parties.
The democratic party has become so divisive I can’t stand it.
I don’t know how anybody does.

Posted by: dem no more | May 30, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Isn’t it funny how Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, Rev. Wright, Farrakhan, Michelle have all been laying low lately? Was there a memo to keep your traps shut, keep a low profile…we are almost within grasp? Don’t ya think there has been communication to some of the higher profile outspoken black to go underground for awhile? I think Wright is tied up and gagged. Who guards his front door?

Posted by: Debra | May 30, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Just another reminder that Obama is the great divider

Posted by: S | May 30, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Yup, clearly the news media LOVES Obama…that”s why they bury stories like this.
Oh, wait a minute.
Funny how most anti-Obama talking points just never end up being true.

Posted by: janet32 | May 30, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

I agree that such comments are offensive and have no place in the pulpit. I am also offended, however, by the relative lack of msm coverage given to Liz Trotta (Fox news analyst)who in essence called for Obama’s assassination. Curiously, the news media has selective judgment when it comes to what is “outrageous” and what is not. I wonder whether Liz Trotta would have made such statements had she not followed Senator Clinton’s lead just a day or so after Sen. Clinton’s “gaffe” regarding Robert Kennedy, and after Sen. Huckabee’s joke regarding someone taking a shot at Obama. Where is the blanket coverage of Liz Trotta’s remarks as compared to this priest. All three major news outlets made this priest’s remarks a feature in their morning broadcasts. But, pretty much, only in the blogosphere did I find the story regarding Liz Trotta’s remarks. There is such a double standard when it comes to Obama and Clinton. She seems to get “sympathy” and credibility when she cries sexism. Obama cannot DARE to play the race card — even though he’s been called “boy”, referenced in a “tar baby” commentary (both by elected officials). So it appears it is ok for Hillary to be an “angry white woman”, but nooooo way can Obama come off as an “angry black man”. And his every association (let’s not even GO THERE with Hillary…and Bill…) seems to raise some suspicion of wrongness or poor judgment on Obama’s part. I’m truly disgusted with this campaign (Hillary’s dirty tactices) and the media — on the latter, there is no such thing as “fair and balanced”.

Posted by: KCT | May 30, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

SandyB: Obama has never thrown Wright under the bus, never denounced him, disowned him or etc. He did finally disclaim some of Wright’s COMMENTS after Wright spoke at the Press Club, and said their relationship had “changed” but he never denounced Wright. Obama chooses his words carefully in order to mislead. It works too often. He also said earlier that Wright had “retired”, but a few sentences later said he was “on a sabbatical”. I’m betting the sabbatical is the correct version.
Lightnin’

Posted by: Lightnin | May 30, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Pfleger needs to be kicked out of the priesthood. Nothing less will do. He should have been kicked out for having Farrakhan at the Catholic Church. Farrakhan is a well-known racist and anti-semite. Why would he be invited to the Church? These people are all nuts.
Again, Pfleger needs to be gone from the Catholic Church. I am Catholic who will not give any more of my money or time to the Church until the likes of Pfleger is booted for good. He is disgusting and so is anyone who rationalizes his antics.

Posted by: Patricia | May 30, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Dear Hillary Supporters,
Please vote Mccain in fall,this is the last straw.Sitting at home or voting Nader is a vote for Obama and his racist friends.Nobama.
Thanks

Posted by: vic | May 30, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

When is Hillary going to apologize to Barack and Michelle for her RFK assassination remark?

Posted by: Doug | May 30, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Oh, and give me a break with this Hagee stuff. McCain did not sit in Hagee’s church for 20 years and did not call him a friend and mentor. Yes, Obama should be held accountable for the people he associates with especially because they are turning out to be all racist, terrorist, Jew haters and America haters. Obama and his friends are disgusting people.

Posted by: Patricia | May 30, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

KS wrote: 8. One needs to wonder why he didn’t vote to go to war…with the info they were given at the time…could it be he doesn’t want to attack a Muslim country???
NO!
The reason is Barack Husein Obama opposed the war to protect his mansion.
Nadhmi Auchi is an Iraqi-born billionaire, protected secret money for Saddam Hussein, and -Auchi also financially backed Saddam Hussein’s plan for a pipeline from Iraq to Saudi Arabia, and Auchi good friend of Tony Rezko, and Auchi loaned money to Rezko (Syrian Born).
When Sadam Hussein was captured, Nadhmi Auchi was charged along with Saddam Hussein for conspiring to assassinate Prime minister (president) Abdul Karim Qasim and stood trial in 1959. (Auchi gave fellow Baath Party members machine guns from his home for Saddam Hussein.)
You Obama supporters, Obama’s house was bought from blood money. Obama couldn’t buy his house without Rezko’s help. Rezko had to borrow the money from Nadhmi Auchi who got rich from the Oil for Food UN debauchery. THIS GUY IS PURE SCUM

Posted by: Gee | May 30, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Hillary was referencing the “time period” in his RFK remarks.
THIS IS CLEARLY REFERENCING RACIAL ISSUES.

Posted by: John | May 30, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

To the poster who said Pfleger isn’t racist for calling white people “whitey” because he’s white. Think a little. Pfleger doesn’t think he’s white. He may look it, but inside he thinks he’s black. Listen to the way he’s immitating the Jeremiah White’s speaking style. His distaste for whites speaks volumes.
I wonder how he’d feel if all the parishes in the Archidiocese that keep his afloat decided to withhold their funds.
Maybe then he’d realize that regardless of color people in the Archidiocese care about the poor and infirm around them. Not only is a portion of the donations in every parish in the Archidiocese of Chicago given to the poorer parishes, every parish is also paired up with sister parishes (ours has at least three in the Chicago area as well as parishes in the South and overseas). Every month we dontate food for food pantries, clothing and gifts for young children at Christmas, etc., but now I learn that I’m just evil whitey whose donations aren’t appreciated by someone who knows damn well how much is given.
He choses to ignore that and intentionally turns people against those who are helping only because of their color. That’s racism.

Posted by: SAM | May 30, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

I have a question for the Moderates, Independents and Democrats out there: Is this stuff affecting your opinion of Obama?? I can see a lot of negative comments here about this issue, but they may be mostly from Conservatives and Republicans.

Posted by: GregInSeattle | May 30, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Is Barack Obama still a member of Trinity?

Posted by: Ann | May 30, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Whatever!!!!!
The same way he try to distance himself by going to his church for 20 years….. Who cares what Obama say anymore!!!!!! He just want a free ride to the WHITEHOUSE!!!!! He wants free ride with the media, he don’t wont to talk about issue anymore, and now he don’t want to debate nobody!!!! He just looks for a FREE RIDE!!!!!!

Posted by: John | May 30, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Obama is totally share the wright’s value. He throw his white grandma under the bus, not to mention the general white American.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

“That hate hadn’t gone away”….”white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”
Barack Hussein Obama from
Dreams Of My Father
Obama is the New Messiah
for
the
New
and
Improved……………….
Black Liberation Theology…..
Connect the dots folks…. it’s all in his books.

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 30, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Obama refers to Wright as his former pastor implying he left him and that Wright didn’t retire.
People on the CNN blogs seem to think delegates can’t change their minds at convention. They also think these delegates are the electoral college. They get all excited about some endorsement and the person isn’t even a Super. And they call these educated voters?
Obama has the black and ultra left left and thats about it. No way can he win the general.
the popular vote doesn’t win the election. Its the electoral. Ask Al Gore. Big states with the most electoral went to Clinton. If FL could vote again she would win it. Red states will not go for OB. or Clinton.
Some people in the early states wouldn’t have voted for OB if they knew then what they know now.

Posted by: Kathy WI | May 30, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

A Priest is suppose to teach love, not hate. I am 76 years old, I have never known a priest to act like that! I do not understand the congregation, cheering, clapping. I would have walked out the door. Obama ay not have been in church that day, but if he belongs to a church that teaches hated, we do not need him to be president!

Posted by: BARBANEL | May 30, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

As a Floridian and Democrat, I will not vote for Obama, since he doesn’t think my vote is worth counting. The blue collar, Reagan Democrats will determine the outcome of this election; and they ain’t voting for Obama

Posted by: Frank in Miami | May 30, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Another not important issue. What’s going to happen with the war, the economy, the environment?
Tell me that.
Pastors are not candidates. These fellows are Americans and like most of us have opinions which they are free to express. It is the media that continues to try to tie a tether from Obama to these men. Obama is an attendee at a church that does excellent community service. Sometimes it has multiple speakers. Read the Washington post’s article today about another speaker who spoke the same day as Pfleger. She had another view. Imagine that…another view.
Wake Up Fellow Americans, we are not robots and are allowed to think for ourselves no matter what we hear, see or are exposed to. We are allowed to disagree. We are allowed to find value in things that are imperfect.
Anyone who faults Obama because of Wright or Pfleger is simply foolish. We are not one in the same in this world.

Posted by: erica | May 30, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Greg In Seattle,
The only people on this site are opinionated democrats and republicans. Moderates and independents don’t have strong views – they blow in the wind and make up their minds late in the game. They’re not going to be visiting a blog at ABC News to post their views because they don’t dig that deep into stories or follow the nits and nats of political news.

Posted by: SAM | May 30, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

My vote is going to Hillary or McCain come November.
John from Florida.

Posted by: John | May 30, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Greg, good for you! 4 more years of George Bush is what you and those swing staters want — vote McCain. You’ll get what you are asking for!
This is just stupid! Oh, I forgot, these states represent those ‘hard-working Americans, white Americans’. Those undereducated blue collar Americans. Makes a lotta sense to me…LOL.

Posted by: Cruisin | May 30, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Let me see… the rich are for Obama, the corporate are for Obama, the anti-Americans are for Obama… who is for Hillary? I AM FOR HILLARY

Posted by: John Riely | May 30, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

I think that the American security level should put in yellow now. Hussein Obama is an threat to our safety.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Thanks, Jim. I’m just wondering how much this will affect Obama’s chances, and am trying to evaluate it. I’m an (R) a good friend is a (D) and thinks this will all roll off of Obama. I don’t.

Posted by: GregInSeattle | May 30, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Any democrat who votes for McCain come November does not share the sentiment of the Democratic party or its ideals. Whether the candidate is Obama or Hilary they share the same hopes and dreams for the future. Stop being racists and learn about Obama before judging him!

Posted by: TonyC | May 30, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Obama: “your typical white person”
What is that suppose to mean? Did Obama slip a racist remark?

Posted by: "Your Typical White Person" | May 30, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Greg In Seattle,
How this affects Obama depends upon who votes. If the la-di-da super rich liberals and pie-in-the-sky college students out vote the hard working middle class tax payers, Obama will win. Midwesterners, hate this kind of racist talk. Walk into any local store and you’ll hear about it.

Posted by: SAM | May 30, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Any democrat voting for Hillary or McCain may send a message that they do not like his or his pastors racism.

Posted by: John | May 30, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I voted for Hillary but I’m not a democrat or repulican.I AM A AMERICAN VOTER .If Barack Obama is nominee Iwill support McCain and other dem. will do the same.Superdelegates BEWARE careful with your choice.Besides McCain is no George Bush.

Posted by: Ruben | May 30, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Obama says what he has to say in order to get the nomination, what a lie he is living. Both he and Michelle are after one thing, get in the white house and make history. They don’t give a hoot about anyone else. Michelle is a bitter black women she talks about her husband like he is dirt, says his kids don’t want to wake him up in the morning because he really smells bad, what kind of women is this anyway?

Posted by: Cathy | May 30, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

SandyB: Obama has never thrown Wright under the bus, never denounced him, disowned him or etc. He did finally disclaim some of Wright’s COMMENTS after Wright spoke at the Press Club, and said their relationship had “changed” but he never denounced Wright. Obama chooses his words carefully in order to mislead. It works too often. He also said earlier that Wright had “retired”, but a few sentences later said he was “on a sabbatical”. I’m betting the sabbatical is the correct version.
Lightnin’

Posted by: Lightnin | May 30, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Politics aside, Mr. Pfleger has already excommunicated himself from the Church of Christ. His message is not that of love, hope, charity, forgiveness, peace and reconciliation. What non-Catholics don’t understand is that there is only one Priest, Prophet and King. It is Christ Jesus alone. Episcopos in Apostolic Succession vow obedience and poverty to serve Him within His Priesthood. Anyone who claims authority and invokes His name yet betrays His will and misleads others commits blasphemy against the Body of Christ. Since Mr. Pfleger has abandoned his vows and faith in favor of black liberation theology he should start his own church. With his connections I doubt he’d have any problems financially but wonder if he’ll keep his tax exempt status.
Pax

Posted by: James | May 30, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

“The Catholic Church does not endorse political candidates. Consequently, while a priest must speak to political issues that are also moral, he may not endorse candidates nor engage in partisan campaigning.
So…what does Cardinal George say about the GOP Priest who attacked Obama at last evening’s NY State Republican dinner? Can’t have it both ways – hehe

Posted by: Cruisin | May 30, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Old Democrat,
There is nothing clear about Obama, he has been unknown, un-vetted and preaches change. I think he and his bitter wife need to look in their own back yard. So much for answers from Obama, he has none to give because he really does not know what to say.

Posted by: Cathy | May 30, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Rev. Wright had been Obama’s preacher for 20 years and a mentor. How can Obama stand for a different change and peace if his ex-pastor is talking such hate. As a person if you went to somewhere and you were not treated well you would not go again. However, Obama attended the same church a for a very long time. This tells me that Obama may share the same value as Rev. Wright.

Posted by: M.vu | May 30, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Spiritual advisors and political advisors are two separate breeds of cat!
An individual looks to a spiritual advisor when his faith is being tested, or when he, himself, is questioning his faith for whatever reason.
An individual, particularly one who is running for political office, looks to a political advisor to help steer his political course through the sink holes, rotten tomatoes, sandbars, garbage, lies and innuendos which are the unfortunate hazzards associated with politics and which have certainly been rampant throughout these comments.
Obama has considered Wright a spiritual advisor. His relationship with Pfleger was in the same realm. Neither of these clerics are, have been, or shall be Obama’s political advisors.

Posted by: nanameow | May 30, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Let me see… the rich are for Obama, the corporate are for Obama, the anti-Americans are for Obama… who is for Hillary? I AM FOR HILLARY
——
Let ME see.
Hillary has taken more money from corporations and lobbyists than ANY OTHER candidate in this campaign.
She and her husband have made MILLIONS personally from their connections to big business.
Her voting record reflects a business over labor mentality.

Posted by: janet32 | May 30, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

How about answering the question, previous posters?
No, (other than in video clips like the one mentioned) I’ve never heard a priest mock a political figure.

Posted by: Gerry | May 30, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Thanks Pfleger. This ensures that McCain will get in. The words coming out of Obama’s friends, and anyone associated with him keep giving more fuel to McCain’s presidential aspirations. Those words sound like music to my ears.

Posted by: wowzer | May 30, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Anyone who gets the Chicago news knows what a loose cannon Father Pfleger is. If memory serves, the Diocese on more than one occasion has tried to clamp down on him and/or remove him from his parish. He does some good work (especially on guns/violence) but is also known to love the spotlight as much as another of his “friends” Jesse Jackson. His “performance”- and I view it as that, not preaching- was disrespectful and inappropriate, but is certainly not Obama’s fault.

Posted by: MMMom | May 30, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Gerry, I’ve never heard this from the pulpit of any church before, either. See my previous post for more thoughts on this. Oh, and by the way, I’ve never heard of a former whitehouse press secretary outing a president before in this manner, either…but **** happens. If the truth fits….

Posted by: KCT | May 30, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Hillary was referencing the “time period” in his RFK remarks.
THIS IS CLEARLY REFERENCING RACIAL ISSUES.
—————
But it was HILLARY’S own words. SHE said it!
These are not Obama’s word. They belong to someone else. There is a difference.
Quit trying to impose everything anyone says as Obama’s point of view.

Posted by: janet32 | May 30, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Obama says what he has to say in order to get the nomination, what a lie he is living
——-
Like covert operations into hostile Bosnian territoies under the threat of sniper fire?
I know what you mean.

Posted by: janet32 | May 30, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Hillay’s campiagn gets mad when she is quoted for saying distateful things.
However, they are happy to use someone, who is not Obama, and spread it around the media.
Just like Hillary….hypocrites

Posted by: janet32 | May 30, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I do not think that Obama gets along with his grandmother these days. He did not visit her over Easter. He did not mention her in interviews on Mother’s Day. Something is wrong there. Probably Michelle does not like Mrs. Dunham. If Obama spoke with his grandmother more often, he might not get so confused about his white relatives and their military exploits.

Posted by: Patricia | May 30, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

“Spiritual advisors and political advisors are two separate breeds of cat!”
Yeah, you keep trying to convince yourself of that. The only breeds of cat that are hanging around Obama are angry racists and former terrorists. Does he have any friends or advisors who don’t hate America and whites?
Ordinary people don’t believe the line you Obama supporters keep trying to sell that his pals don’t speak for him. These men aren’t casual acquaintances who he saw occassionally on Sunday. These are people he’s known for years, whose endorsements were posted on his website and whom Obama used for to provide his background to the public. Well, his background and references are looking pretty ugly.

Posted by: SAM | May 30, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

More hate from an Obama mentor? How much more will people tolerate? Obama is exactly like his mentors, yet must pretend otherwise. He will continue to draw criticisim for his beliefs. I’m not buying anymore lies from this man. Of course I never bought into his message in the first place. We can only pray the superdelegates realize the damage his church will cause in the General Election. I will write in Hillary Clinton on my ballot in November. We can not have a racist for President or a racist first lady. Obama continues to divide this country along racial lines. He has set racial relations back a hundred years.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I don’t think the Archdiocese of Chicago went far enough here. They have had issues with this guy before, and he is in clear need of a defrocking.
But, he is clearly part of the Chicago political machine, as are Obama and Axelrod.
Axelrod is chair on a fundraising committee at Pfleger’s church. You can see it here:
Scroll down to read the Raising the Roof for Saint Sabina Letter and you will see Axelrod listed right after Daley & Pfleger. He’s the number three man on that committee.

Posted by: Foodforthought | May 30, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

America is ready & willing to vote in a black president. They are just not ready to vote in someone that support racism like Barack Obama.

Posted by: Tommy | May 30, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

SandyB: Obama has never thrown Wright under the bus, never denounced him, disowned him or etc. He did finally disclaim some of Wright’s COMMENTS after Wright spoke at the Press Club, and said their relationship had “changed” but he never denounced Wright. Obama chooses his words carefully in order to mislead. It works too often. He also said earlier that Wright had “retired”, but a few sentences later said he was “on a sabbatical”. I’m betting the sabbatical is the correct version.
Lightnin’

Posted by: Lightnin | May 30, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Not a shocker, I believe there is more of this “nasty baggage” that will follow. BO stinks and so does Mr. Obama’s character. Do not let this man become the leader of the free world, we will ALL have something much more than buyers remorse.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

I wonder it is really a church or a terrorist group, wondering Osama’s antiwar claim is really out of good judgement or just influenced by his pastor Wright and others’ sermon! dems gonna screw up this election, Osama simply is not electable, people are just so afraid to say anything bad about him because if you do, you will be labled as a racist.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

And they [Obama and his gang] still insist that they are not making this race about “rac, while they insist on doing the exact opposite”. The damage and the division that Obama is causing in this country may bring very sour grapes in the future.
Pfleger has offendied me as a catholic, as a democrat and as a human being.
Father Pfleger, your apologies are NOT accepted. Please go see a shrink.

Posted by: SGV-Miami | May 30, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Another racist whose known Obama for more than 20 years. This man also was on Obama’s advisory committee. Connect the dots people. We should now see a flow of superdelegates from Obama to Clinton.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Obama is unelectable.
You’ll see what I mean come november if he wins the nomination.

Posted by: Timothy | May 30, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Go Pfleger! His comments were spot on (though perhaps untimely).
I bet you’re all very disappointed that Pfleger isn’t black. That would make it so much easier for you to hate and fear him like you do Obama.
To think Obama is racist (or for that matter, Phlager or even Wright) is just laughable and a sign that historical context has no influence on your simplistic “black & white” world view.
Obama is the nominee, time to decide for yourselves, Obama or McCain. There’s really no reason to discuss it on these imbecile blogs.

Posted by: Brad | May 30, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

The catholic church must do something more than be “disappointed” in this racist man. I am embarrased to be a catholic and unless the Cardinal has some stronger words backed by action of defrocking this insulting, idiot, I am going to renounce my membership in the catholic religion. We have had enough of Phlager!

Posted by: embarrased catholic | May 30, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

HOW MANY more apologies do we need to hear from Obama before we disown him?
His numerous affiliations do tend to speak volumes about his moral compass and political will.
His hardball tactics in winning his State Senate seat if proof he will do what he has to do, and say what he has to say, to get elected!
Underneath this empty suit is just a slick politician.

Posted by: BJ | May 30, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Now we are going to hear Obama fans say, nothing to see here just move along. This friend of Obama is yet another bad judgment call by Obama.
I was a Dem but changed to an Independent and I most likely will stay home in 08.
This is some sick stuff form Obama’s friends.
PS
I’m from Florida and Obama doesnt want my vote anyways.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Kerry,
You’re right. Obama doesn’t want your vote and wouldn’t get it anyway. No one wants it. Don’t fool yourself into thinking anyone cares.

Posted by: Brad | May 30, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Lets be real. What that priest said was true, he just said it in bad way. He!He!

Posted by: GetOverItPeople | May 30, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Of course, Obama called Pfleger’s remarks “divisive”.
If I had a nickel for every time Obama or his minions said something was “divisive”, I could retire, since I’m one of the few white people out there without a “trust fund”, contrary to what Pfleger believes….

Posted by: Foodforthought | May 30, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

OMG! Some jerk with a priest’s collar say something stupid and Mr. Obama is the cause of this? However, the truth of the matter is, this story would not grow legs if it was centiped. Although, I see certain factions are gonna give it the old college try. To them I say have at, soon enough this circus will pull up it’s tents and go home. I leave it to you!

Posted by: We The People | May 30, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

I am soooooooo disgusted with the Obama tribe, I just can’t believe another nut came out of his shell.
Obama needs to stop saying anything about UNITING this country, he has done nothign but set race relations back a century. Maybe people do feel inwardly racist but most are quite pleasant to each other and take people one on one. This church is preaching hatred for Whites.

Posted by: Joyce | May 30, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Obama donates money to and supports this hate filled church. Nuff said.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Obama is so so weak! He can’t keep apologizing and think its ok, these people he has been friendly with for years keep saying these stupid hurtful things about white americans. I as a white american was repulsed by this and especially to see all the people in the crowd cheering and clapping. DOWNRIGHT Sick behavior. For a possible future president to come from a place like this is just wrong. Obama said the church was better after Wright left but its not and Obama needs to stop lying.
THE SUPERDELEGATES need to wake up and change their votes to CLinton, this is crazy, the democrats will not win in November unless the superdelegates wake up now!

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

He should have been kicked out for having Farrakhan at the Catholic Church. Farrakhan is a well-known racist and anti-semite. Why would he be invited to the Church?
***************************************
Why indeed??? Maybe we can ask Mel Gibson? Or the pope? Maybe they can shed some light on this.

Posted by: Annoyed | May 30, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Hey Greg,
Bitterness from blacks directed at white culture isn’t racism. It’s resentment. It’s historically justified and it’s really sad and pathetic when whites suddenly start feeling like they’re somehow the victims.
It might be sad, it might be mired in yesterday, but it isn’t racism. And to call Obama a racist because he’s had to live on the line between the white and black world is just silly. Judge him by the entirely of his character, not by the people who support him or by the theatre of the black pulpit.

Posted by: Brad | May 30, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

The Catholic Church really needs to dos omething about this as well. First of all priest should stay out of politics. But to top it off when a CATHOLIC PRIEST is supporting a candidate that endorses partial birth abortion, it is a slap in the face. He should not be allowed to be a priest anymore.

Posted by: Joyce | May 30, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Obama is always “deeply disappointed” about anything that comes out negative about him. I am “deeply disappointed” that this man was put pushed down our throats whether it be by the media or the DNC. You would have thought he was the second coming of Christ, the way he has been treated. I am sure that he will not be called on the carpet for the racist and sexist remarks made by this “priest” whom he has known for years and worked on his campaign. It was going to be a hard decision for me, if he wins the nomination, as to whom I would vote for in the GE, but all said and done I’ll go for the lesser of two evils and vote for McCain.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

How can anybody here with an IQ above 5 support. She lies constantly, makes outrageous comments and says she was “tired” (she told the RFK assasination story 3 times) lies about being shot at, makes racial remarks, initially supported not counting FL and MI and now is indignant they are not counted. She does not have the character to be president.
AND quit blaming Obama for FL and MI, it was the DNC and their own state governments. Saying it is Obama blocking their votes is worthy of a 12 year old.

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Yes, Pastor Wright is a millionaire victim of racism and has been kept down for so long. Hate pays.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

The tragedy is that readers don’t recognize the dangerous path down which the media is leading us. Guilt by association is the height of yellow journalism. Non-news. McCarthy is alive and well, and it turns the First Amendment against us. Do we want every politician, or every citizen to be judged by statements made by others? Forget religious associations — what about the much more influential views of teachers or PARENTS? I’m sure many of us have close associations with parents who are racist or worse. Should we be condemned for the sins of our fathers? They influenced us, but other factors gave us choices and wisdom to see beyond our differences. The media is encouraging and breeding hate and stone throwing when we all live in glass houses. This will go done in history as among our most shameful of times because we allow this sickness to continue.

Posted by: Phil | May 30, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Kerry, how was Obama pushed down your throat. Many people voted for him. He managed a much more effective campaign than Hillary. You can hold your breath and stomp your feet but Obama won this nomination fair and square by the rules in place. Hillary is trying to change the rules she supported, but he won because people voted for him. The media gives her so many free passes and she still blows it.

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

The hypocrisy of people is just comical. Rev Wright had nothing to do with this issue and was invited to the White House by President Clinton for his charitable works. I refuse to condemn someone and throw everything they did for THEIR community out the window for over 20 years just because I disagreed with a comment they made and saw a snippet of a sermon done years ago, he may not be speaking for you but he was speaking for some people who came out of the Civil Rights era that were very hardened by their experiences and if you lived through that you same people would be pissed off as well. That was his right to say what was on his mind in thir community, 90% of the people reading this blog don’t care one way or the other about what happens on the South Side of Chicago because it doesnt change or affect their lives, the church members there are not being brainwashed and they are intelligent enough to come up with their own beliefs. This was a WHITE CATHOLIC priest who made this distasteful comment during a guest sermon after another White Priest spoke of UNITY and common interests, so are you going to call him a racist. His words were very poorly chosen for the point he was trying to make, but the underlying part is he was right. HRC, was crying on national television to gain sympathy, because she felt it was too tough for her at the time and she felt victimixed, its politics so get a helmet. Did you ever see Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher crying on television, she wouldnt have given them the satisfaction. Then the next week, after NH feels bad for her and gives her a win, she TURNS into a gun totter, whiskey chugger, ROCK and champion for the so-called BLUE COLLAR WHITE WORKING CLASS, who just happened to fit the part of the country she was campaigning in, and tells Obama, “If he can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen.” NEVERMIND that there are WHITE BLUE COLLAR WORKING CLASS people all over this country who supported Obama over her. She felt she was entitled to this nomination a year ago and never thought it would be an actual race, she was wrong and she has gotten beat. I don’t feel sorry for the campaign she ran, and neither should anyone else who is practical in thinking. There will be a woman President someday, and it will be a woman who is a lot different than Hillary R. Clinton.
So there will be no Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton White House. Its time for new ideas, new thinking, new blood and new energy.
Obama may not be perfect, but so what none of these candidates are, but he has handled himself with class and dignity despite the long odds and he has come out on top and that is why he is winning and not why she LOST.
Go Obama…

Posted by: thisissilly | May 30, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

The real problem with this video is not the mocking of Hillary Clinton – it is the rest of the speech where this priest spews hatred for all white people and the parishoners stand up and cheer. This is the church that Senator Obama says is “christian” which he claims led him to Jesus. These are the same people Sen. Obama reached out to in order to launch his political career. It is time for him to withdraw from this election before we have to endure any more of this. By staying in this race he is dividing the country in ways never imagined. He is bringing shame to all the people of this country, and most importantly to the majority of African-Americans who are honest, hard-working, loving people.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Its going to be tough for Obama to get the large and powerful Catholic vote come November.
No Catholic is going to appreciate this. Obama’s done. Maybe we should all thank Pfleger.

Posted by: Foodforthought | May 30, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

I am sick and tired of Obama forgetting the views, prejudices, and attitudes of his friendsof 20 years. Once again, Obama plays the gender card and sexism rears it’s ugly head. He is such an adapt politician — not at all a man of change — that he would have been great at Tamany Hall (I doubt his young endorsers know enough about history to even get this reference.) We heard how he manipuated his way through Chicago politics, we know he’s taken favors from Rezko, we see him playing the race card to his advantage so that no one dares criticize him for fear of being called a racist. He is not the candidate of change — he is the cadidate of deception and insensitivity. He’s like the Piped Piper leading the children off, and his campaign is out of a fairy tale with the wolf in sheep’s clothing.

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

One of the sad facts that has emerged as as a result of Obama’s candidacy is that there are a lot of quasi-racist who don’t even recognize that they are. Every thread reveals posters saying that Rev Wright is a racist, and so by association so is Obama. They also say that Obama “threw his Grandmother under the bus” because he noted her speaking of her fear of black men, perhaps 35 to 40 years ago. Good grief, there are loads of white people who’s pulse will quicken at the sight of approaching black teenage boys today. Are we supposed to pretend that this don’t exist, or that it wasn’t worse in the past? I heard every one of my white Grandparents make racist comments, and I don’t consider it “throwing them under the bus” to tell about it.
The fastest growing segment of our society is the biracial segment. They are emerging in sports, music, the arts and now politics. I like the idea because I’m sure that they grew up loving people of more than one color, one culture. They can bring us together in a way that no representative of one race, or culture, can. Americans should be proud of our diversity; there’s no other place in the world quite like it.

Posted by: Javalation | May 30, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

This is a disgrace! Obama wants to tie McCain to Bush, well some of us tie Obama to Wright, and this new pastor. The link is Obama’s church, a church Obama defends and is a member of.
Wake up people. Do you really want a unknow junior senator who has ties to all these hateful people.
Hillary or McCain

Posted by: kerry | May 30, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Nice speech javalation. Maybe next Sunday you can go down to TUCC and get them up to speed. Seems like they’re stuck on hate over there.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Spock — you have no right to use that name as Spock was a super far left liberal. Oh, and so was Benjamin Spock. So, I don’t really get your moniker.
Also, I am no fan of the “Spurge” of racism. But I think you’re thinking of divisiveness, bias and/or prejudice. How are the comments of these men racist? If anything, what they are doing is accusing our white culture of being racist. This may be divisive. They may be accusing whites of racism, but they are not saying that blacks are better than whites and that whites need to pay a tax in order to vote or that whites need to use a different water fountain.
Oh, and the definitions of words actually do evelove, so it wouldn’t be the greatest offense to try to change the definition of the word “racism.”
Live long and prosper… (but take out long and prosper)

Posted by: Brad | May 30, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

I would like to know why the whole clip isn’t being shown on MSM? The first part of Pfleger’s performance is about white entitlement and supremacy. To me this is the worst part. “Don’t hold me responsible for what my ancestors did.” At what point are these people going to take responsible for themselves?

Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 30, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Kerry, Obama ties McCain to Bush because he espouse similar policies, such as Iraq. Your tying Rev. Wright to Obama is overly simple, but expected.

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

IF OBAMA LOSES TO MCCAIN IN NOVEMBER,
HILLARY LIKELY WILL RE-RUN IN 2012 & COULD WIN BIG IMO.
VOTE FOR MCCAIN IN 08′!

Posted by: "Your Typical White Person" | May 30, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

i did not see the speech nor do i want to. michael pfleger, however, has been a champion for civil rights and for black people for many years and is an exemplary priest and religious leader believing in social justice. what he and what wright said about blacks and their relation to white history and oppression in america are not wrong and they’re not lies. it’s kind of like the bully on the playground who beats up the little kid at the monkey bars and then is shocked and insensed when that little kid finally ups and rebels and gives the bully the uppercut to the jaw he so deserves. americans need to brush up on their history. the treatment of black people here has been anything but pretty. it’s better now, but it ain’t ambrosia. obama associates with wright and pfleger because they represent the social justice issues prevalent in urban centers like chicago for so many years. and what’s wrong with that? it’s too bad that obama has to distance himself from the mentors that made and shaped him and caused him to look at the world in a more sympathetic light. i am not crazy about obama as a presidential candidate. i honestly like none of them. but i think the public needs to take a good, hard look at all this and separate typical american media sensationalims from the platforms and issues that our presidential candidates ought to be addressing and that will affect our children’s children’s futures.

Posted by: m.b. | May 30, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

If you think for one moment that all these southern baptists churches down here in the south aren’t bellowing from the pulpit the conservative political agenda and support for a presidential candidate, then I have to say you’re sadly mistaken. Go into any church where there is a political discussion and you will here it. But, give them a national platform i.e., the networks, well you all but give them reason to be that much more inflammatory.
I’m curious to know why, since Barack Obama has been in the news since his inspirational speech at the 2002 convention, how is it that these industrious journalist are just now discovering connections to inflammatory preachers.

Posted by: Andrew | May 30, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

He tied himself to Wright by having him as his personal mentor for 20 years, for donating to and supporting TUCC which in turn pays Wright to preach hate.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Axelrod just pulled down the web page on St Sabina’s that had the letter on it showing his name as the chair of a fundraising committee.
He should have astroturfed that site months ago….

Posted by: Foodforthought | May 30, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

An oppressed millionaire. Poor guy. Hate pays.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Well, I agree that charging someone guilty by association is a dangerous course.
However, it is one that most people enjoy because it gives them a chance to be whipped into a mob by others. Then after they have killed or destroyed someone they can say, “OH, if we had only known!”
Unless we hear vile things or see them from the candidates personally, we cannot convict either one for the actions of anyone they associate with unless they specifically say, “X speaks for me.”
To charge someone guilty by association is to say that a battered wife agrees with the batterer because she stays in a marriage. It is to say that you support pornography because you might live with someone who is addicted to it. It is to say that the family of a serial killer must have done something or gone along with them and agreed.
You can’t hold anyone accountable for the words or actions of another. You can only judge them based on what they say about the situation and how they handle it when it arises. I think that the Senator saying I am disappointed in this man and that I don’t agree with him and that there is no place in my campaign for this, is a pretty clear statement.
I suggest we judge all the candidates on what they say and do and not on what others say and do.

Posted by: Annoyed | May 30, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

“I just have to say, as someone of faith, I have never before heard a cleric engage in such disdainful mockery from a pulpit. Have you?”
The image that comes to mind is Wright at the pulpit comparing what Bill did to Monica to what Bill did to blacks… “doin’ her dirty” (insert obscene hip and hand movements)…
I repeat from the pulpit.
Perhaps it time for the Archdiocese to transfer him. Let’s see how well he lives up to his vows of obedience.

Posted by: smartprimate | May 30, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Mack, that is still far different form supporting Bush’s policies. I take Obama at his word, he seems well reasoned and unifying. He is apologizing something a supporter said, whereas Hillary is always havint to explain what she said, i.e. – “I remember dodging sniper fire as we ran to our cars.”

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

No one forced him to associate himself with TUCC and its pastors. He did that all by himself. And he continues to associate himself by remaining a member and donating to their cause.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

If Hillary wins in 2012, I am moving to Zimbawe.

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

You people are talking about a few comments taken from years of speeches. Pfleiger has been a sore spot for Chicago for years. Both have done tremendous good work for the poor and downtrodden, have you? Wright fought in the Marines, 2 tours in Vietnam and was decorated, while Bill was avoiding the draft. People say things they sometimes regret. Some of my friends have said things I don’t agree with but no one puts it on TV over and over.

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

It is time that the IRS start enforcing the law, Churches cannot engage in political behavior, which includes endorsing a candidate, without having their tax exempt status put at risk. The IRS has NEVER enforced this law with regards to black churches, but let a white church have a similar sermon and watch out! TUCC engages in black racism and Obama should have taken the hint when Oprah left there after only a few months.

Posted by: Peter S. | May 30, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

The Obama campaign is really getting nervous. This story is gaining traction.
The campaign is pulling things from their website having any assoc. with this guy.

Posted by: John | May 30, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

The fact that Obama was associated with that church for over twenty years sure does associate him with the possessed rantings of the pastors there.
He’s heard it, and didn’t leave on his own, he didn’t want to dis-associate himself from Rev. Wright until he had to, and then it might be too late.
So Yes, I do believe he is guilty of association.

Posted by: aquaglass | May 30, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Peter S. It is just not black churches. What about Reverend Hagee? How about hundreds of southern conservative “churches” that are actively engaged in politics?

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

This isn’t the first time Pfleger has acted inappropriately. He should be fired immediately! And how is it that the IRS hasn’t yet revoked the tax exempt status of Trinity Church when time and time again they have expressly endorsed one candidate over another (which is illegal for those of you that don’t know).

Posted by: davenp | May 30, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

He didn’t make the comments although he continues to donate and support TUCC, which in turn provides a platform for these hate sermons. If you don’t give them money, they dry up and go away.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

“But it was HILLARY’S own words. SHE said it!
These are not Obama’s word. They belong to someone else. There is a difference.
Quit trying to impose everything anyone says as Obama’s point of view.”
Janet…Obama has no track record at all…he has been a senator for 3 years and 2 of those years have been campaigning. he heads the committee for the afghanistan war and has never had a hearing. He keeps spouting hope and change but that hope and change is a larger government which will not work. He asks us to judge him based on his judgment…but his judgment has been to stay at a hate filled church for the past 20 years and everytime his wife opens her mouth it shows hate and intolerance. I for one am sick of him and he would not make a good president let alone a good senator.

Posted by: fedup | May 30, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Remember Jerry Falwell just 2 years ago on TV leading his flock to pray for the death of two supreme court justices so Bush could appoint conservative judges and change the court. Why is this idiot getting a tax break?

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

aqua, from what I understand Wright covered a variety of topics in his sermons, often having nothing to do with race. Is it your view that if a minister preaches a controversial sermon that everyone who doesn’t agree with it is obligated to quit going?

Posted by: Javalation | May 30, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Geevill–I don’t know, couldn’t find any info on that, but you are correct, it was scrubbed. I’ll keep digging.
By the way, the St Sabina site is back up.
If you google this: st sabina raise the roof, pick the first item on the list to see the letter with Axelrod’s name on it. Scrolls down a little bit to this: Raising the Roof for Saint Sabina Letter, and you can view the letter online.

Posted by: Foodforthought | May 30, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

For those of you who forgot, or do not know the First Amendment of the US Constitution:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The New McCarthyism today is creating an atmosphere where politicians will never set foot in ANY church, and average citizens should be afraid to congregate and religious leaders will fear speaking out on any worldly issues that matter. Congress need not pass a law abridging our freedoms because the cowardly Mass Media is abridging it for us. These are dark times, my friends…
I am only surprised that Senator Obama, who was a Professor of Constitutional Law, has not reminded us not just of our higher selves.

Posted by: Phil | May 30, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Rev Wright and Guilt by association controversy or not…I cannot think of a single good reason to vote for obama.

Posted by: fedup | May 30, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

If I was a candidate running for President, then yes I would be afraid of being seen in or linked to a church that preaches hate. I’m sure there are plenty of good churches in Chicago.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

So are the mayor (an honorable mayor) the Conroys and the Rogers bad people too. This tell you, or should, that many of the powerful people in Chicago support this. Why are you attacking Obama. Tell me why you prefer HRC, the most devisive and reviled person in the senate who has not passed into law any major bill with her name on it.

Posted by: Mark | May 30, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

It doesn’t have anything to do with Hillary. Just Obama and his poor judgment.

Posted by: Mack | May 30, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Food & Mack, everything is relative. You are attacking Obama as if his pluses and minuses are all that matter. Why is that? Do you really not know any negatives for Clinton or McCain? Or is it that you don’t care about their negatives?

Posted by: Javalation | May 30, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

What do they put in the kool aid at Obama’s weirdo church anyway?
Says a lot about Obama that he is a member there. They are worse than Falwell ever was.

Posted by: Dood | May 30, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Our media is promoting fear and making a mockery of our First Amendment. When the media creates an atmosphere where politicians must be afraid to listen and pastors must be afraid to speak and everyone fears being persecuted because of what others they know might have said, it’s beyond tragic. We should ALL be afraid of what our society is becoming. Who DOESN’T have friends and mentors who have made inappropriate or offensive comments? Not McCain, not Obama and certainly not the Clintons. There’s political correctness, and there’s madness. Herein, my friends, lies the path to madness.

Posted by: Phil | May 30, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Well I guess this Pfleger will have to be locked in the closet with Wright, Farrakhan, Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, angry Michelle too. They’ve all been tied up until after November….but too little too late. We “whiteys” know hatred and support of that hatred at Trinity, and WE WILL NEVER VOTE OBAMA!!!!! Some kinda “change” and “unity”….WHERE WAS HIS JUDGEMENT 20 YEARS AGO WHEN CHOOSING A CHURCH? DIDN’T HE KNOW HE WANTED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT THEN AND THIS WOULD NEVER FLY WITH AMERICANS?

Posted by: Debra | May 30, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

If he wasn’t running for President I wouldn’t care a fig where he goes to church or what kind of radicals he lays down with….JUST KEEP HIM THE HELL AWAY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE!

Posted by: Debra | May 30, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

I keep reading on the internet how the Obama campaign is trying to move beyond this issue by dismissing it with words, usually from staffers telling us the story has been addressed and is now behind us. Why is it that some folks, left and right (and I am very, very far to the left), feel that they can dictate when an issue is closed and “we” are “ready for the next question”? The nice thing about living in a country with free speech is you can show your true colors and say what you want, as much as you want. It is not up to the Obama campaign, or anyone else, to decide when it is time for “us” to move on from this issue. I think it is a significant one, so I will think and talk about it whenever and wherever I want. And if I can get a comment posted online, even better. I am always uncomfortable (even in my own leftist circles, especially after a bottle of wine) when someone tries to end a discussion with something brilliantly spoken and then concludes that anyone who dares disagree is either Satan (if you are right wing and the pompous intellect is a right-wing friend), or a clan member (visa versa – left-wing). I was never crazy about the lack of information about Obama, and now I keep seeing associations that make me uncomfortable. I think having an opinion about someone based on the company they keep is valid – especially with politicians who try so hard to cover themselves. You can disagree, of course, but thank goodness I can still choose to take or leave what others have to say based on my own common sense…and oh, yeah…I still get to vote in the end. I could have been for Obama in the end, but this latest “friend” question is the last straw for me, and that WILL be the last question for me if the Obama staffers even care to know (they seem to be acting out a script from a TV show I and a lot of other people are not cast in, so, ummm, have fun ,with that you guys — the rest of us are over here when you get tired of talking). And while I can’t bring myself to vote Republican, I can still vote for Mickey Mouse, at least until a video surfaces with Donald Duck performing a black mass and waving a Confederate flag. Then, I might go ahead and consider the Libertarians.

Posted by: PGC | May 30, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

I don’t know about anybody else, but when I watched the Pfleger video it scared me. What scared me was the thought that an Obama presidency would give entre into the White House to these sorts of “burn baby burn” radicals.
Obama seems to have associated with a lot of people who are so far out of the mainstream that they have no vested interest in the status quo. These are the kinds of far far left radicals that would be willing to destroy the fabric of American culture, because they are not part of American culture.
These are revolutionaries.
I do not think that America is at the point where we need a cultural revolution to solve our problems; but maybe Obama and his comrades believe we do.

Posted by: David H | May 30, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Defrock Pfleger. He’s a nut and he’s an embarrassment. His acts go directly contrary to what Christ is all about. He diminishes the Catholic Church. If he wants to be a self ordained minister, then that’s about all he is good for. But he is a stain on Catholicism.

Posted by: OxyCon | May 30, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

WHO Obama has associated with in the past and in the present is VERY important information for the General Electorate and the Super Delegates to weigh when considering their final choice. As Obama’s VP, Cabinet, and future nominations may indeed come from this circle of associates, it provides possible insight into what kind of a team he will create to lead our nation.
I ask you, does it look like a team of “Uniters”, fighting for the common good of ALL Americans and citizens of the world? Are his associates reflective of “change” that brings peace, prosperity, security, and tolerance to the world?

Posted by: Amy | May 30, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Chicago Catholics have long known that Pfleger is more about the politics than he is about the faith.
I don’t care one way or the other who he is for in the election, but if my parish priest ever acted like that I’d find a new parish pdq.

Posted by: Brian | May 30, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Obama, Wright, & Pfleger are all racists.
I will not vote for Obama if he is the last democrat on earth.
Hillary or McCain for me in November.
(Hillary can re-run in 2012 if Obama loses the general election)

Posted by: Anonom. | May 30, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Rev. Pfleger is a disgrace to his church. He is also an example of the type of people who support Obama and attempt to vilify Hillary Clinton. Rev.Pfleger is one of the reasons Hillary must not quit the Presidential primary.

Posted by: NeverSurrender | May 30, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

I really wish the church would just ex-communicate pastors like him. There is no place for race hustlers like him nor fear mongering in the church. He has no business endorsing any candidate.

Posted by: Steve | May 30, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Right on Operation Chaos….. This is the MOST fun I’ve ever had in an election cycle…..
Go RUSH!

Posted by: reshas1 | May 30, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

I have the greatest respect for Pope Benedict – and I am not a Catholic. Men like Pfleger reduce the Catholic church to a pub where any and all discourse is acceptable and there are no spiritual, moral or religious limits. Men like Pfleger do not deserve a position in the priesthood and he should be removed.

Posted by: Bob | May 30, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

So-called activists like Wright and Pfleger used to be referred to as FIFTH COLLUMN or an AGENT in PLACE.With associates like these, how can Obama continue to insult our intelligence with assurances that their views are their own and not shared ?

Posted by: John in Big D | May 30, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

TUCC pushes racial hatred because it shakes the money tree; just read how the congregation grew from hundreds to 8,000 under Rev. Wright. That church is a disgusting feeding frenzy of hatred. Obama not only went there for 20 years, he took his children too. No one who disagreed with the sermons would have exposed their children to them.

Posted by: HoosierSue | May 30, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Phil, I don’t have friends and mentors who make inappropriate remarks. People who do so aren’t on my same wavelength, and I avoid them like the plague.
But nice try with a page from Obama’s book. Remember how he got caught with the racist Rev. Wright and then turned around and gave the rest of us a lecture on race? In other words, “we’re all guilty”. No we’re not and we’ll send that message loud and clear to Obama and his flock in November.

Posted by: HoosierSue | May 30, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

I see remarks that are blaming Obama for these outlandish and offensive remarks. I also hear a great deal of hate in your remarks. Bigotry accelerated anonymously. J. Wright’s comments were not political in the same sense as FATHER Pfleger’s. And they were understandable from the view of black history. However, I beg to differ with the Cardinal. The Catholic church has electioneered forever. They did for JFK in a huge way and they did in 2004 when the Pope even pronounced against Kerry. I would have felt better if at the end of his remarks this esteemed Cardinal would have APOLOGIZED to Trinity for the offensive remarks, then to HRC, then to Obama and then to the UCC. Take his maverick and put him ON a bus. Pfleger was a guest in that church and he had the audacity to make a worse situation out of an already hurting one. But it surely is working for the bigots, racists and the right wingnuts, isnt’ it? So he was not campaigning for Obama folks, he was campaigning against him. The UCC knows the difference between church and state and they know the rules. And they do have a new pastor. Otis Moss…It is a sad day in Chicago.

Posted by: sally | May 30, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Fr. Pfleger didn’t know what he was saying is what the Democrats are saying. He apologized so let it go! The Priest should not be participating in sermons if he doesn’t know what he is saying. When I viewed the sermon you can see this was not a confused man, he was direct and obnoxious to all white Americans and he really didn’t care. Obama said “he was disappointed” nothing more. Obama keeps company with all of these misfits and they are all coming to the White House with him.

Posted by: Anne | May 30, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

When you read all the posts you can see a HUGE RACIAL DIVIDE beginning in our nation. Obama is the wrong “black” man for this job. Please will another black man step up as there are thousands of you more qualified with less repulsive baggage. I would vote for any person, black, white, red, even green if I felt he or she would do an excellent job for our country. OBAMA is so heavily flawed but a “must” be candidate or there will be a revolution is just crazy and insane for the greatest nation in the world.

Posted by: Anne | May 30, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

You cannot spend 20 yrs in this type of environment and not feel the same way. Any sensible decent person would have literally sprinted away from this church the first time they heard anything like this. Barack, no doubt, heard this type of thing on a regular basis for 2 full decades. Why deny his inner hate-filled racism?
I’d go as far as to say anyone who attends this church is not only a racist at heart, but more importantly- dangerous. If this man is elected leader of the free world, we are all screwed, and I don’t believe that to be hyperbole.

Posted by: TheBlueSite | May 30, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Does Obama know a single person from Chicago who isn’t a racist nutter or criminal? If he does, now is the time to dig him up.

Posted by: linda | May 30, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Barack Obama is a guy formed in the crucible of the hate that is Trinity and, just like Wright, suggests that he wants to end the divisiveness.
I’m not buying it.

Posted by: drjohn | May 30, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I was taught “birds of a feather flock together” and “one bad apple makes the whole barrel bad”. We are all judged by who we have as friends. People that do drugs hang together, drinkers hang together, racists hang together, conservatives hang together. It is human nature to seek out those who think and behave as you do. Barry Hussain Obama is a racist and thinks the church he attends.

Posted by: Grayzel | May 30, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

What I found distasteful about Rv. Pfleger remarks.
That if a woman is white she is entitled and only black people are oppressed. It all about skin color and not at all about sex.
If that was true there would have been a woman president already.
Qualfied women have run Gerraldine Ferraro was a VP and I remember that in a cold war age it was supposed she couldn’t pull the trigger for a nuke because she was a woman or she would pull the trigger for a nuclear bomb because she had her period. That was 20 years ago.
I agree there has been oppression but skin color is not only oppression that has happened.

Posted by: Gr 10 | May 30, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Obama should be shunned.
And his racist, criminal friends.

Posted by: A. C. | May 30, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Still after 24hours the only portion of the tape that appears on NBC and ABC is just the mocking Hillary part, which a lot of people will agree with, laugh and move on. Rewind the tape to the beginning (watch the whole 3:45 minutes on you tube as now 260,000 have done) and you will see the rant isn’t just about Hillary. To paraphrase the priest: ALL you white people need to give up your entitlements (earned money, 401 plans, even the good jobs you were handed for no reason other than being white) if you ever expect to wash the sin of your ancestors from yourself. You are guilty by association for no other reason than your color.
That is the real message here, and the one that should cause pause.

Posted by: Joey in GA | May 30, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Please…it is so important that you think! It was the reaction of the congregation that is disturbing and they have been in Barrack’s camp for some time. To clap for these religious leaders is to support racism. I am both disgusted and scared.

Posted by: Leigh Longbridge | May 30, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

I thought churches could lost tax exemption if they did things such as what we have seen out of tucc.
just a question,
is there anyone else out there like me
thinking, if obama heard nothing but sermons about the love of god and peace, love for fellowman, etc,
where are thoses sermons?
if this is a church where obama says he
“found christ”- when do they ever talk of him?
i wonder if obama has been back to church?
i am glad the church reprimanded the father.

Posted by: america for all | May 30, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I think i could have gone the rest of my life and not heard any of the sermons from tucc.
If there is anything i hold against obama for this is his being on the national scene, has brought these character on the national scene.
he should have taken care of this before he decided to run for president.
unless he really didn’t find anything wrong with what is being preached there.

Posted by: america for all | May 30, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

I can’t hold this to Obama’s charge.
I hope others don’t as well.
TUCC the Santa Clause to the GOP Christmas tree.

Posted by: 0mentum | May 30, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Father Pfleger, was given a slap on the wrist. He should have had discipline proceedings brought against him.
At least the Catholic Church Addressed it far better than Obama did.
His Friend and his religious family applauding and cheering that on, in his own church. He brushed it off, shows he is accustom to that as a routine matter there.

Posted by: seah | May 30, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

“As someone of faith” – real journalistic integrity, Tapper. What an annoying disclosure.

Posted by: Simone | May 30, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Too little, too late, Your Eminence! Pfleger has chased thousands of otherwise faithful from the Church over the recent years. He is a wanton and reckless catalyst. It is long past time he was truly and severely censured and chastised by your office! It is a shame that this episode occurred before I sent you my most honest and reserved considerations concerning Michael Pfleger. He is recognized far and wide as a self-promoting, egregious sycophant, not an advocate for anyone. Reign him in or suffer the consequences! The Church suffers every time he shows his face!

Posted by: Raymond C. Dean | May 30, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Thank you, america for all. I didn’t know that information about Annie Oakley.
Like you, I’ve also spent my adult life trying to level the playing field. I didn’t expect thanks, but I did expect respect. But apparently that doesn’t matter any more, so long as Obama gets what he wants.

Posted by: Fed up in Washington | May 30, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

In 1976 when I was an insignificant graduate student at the University of Illinois, the most charged and prolific word of my two and one half years spent there was — CHANGE! Even then, before Jimmy Carter, before Ronald Reagan, before George Bush or Bill Clinton, the goal was CHANGE! How significant is it that movement from one ideology to ANY other is more important than the resultant effect achieved by any ideology propounded by a national political movement? Isn’t it more about change than any concrete plan, program or policy? Leftists, many in our Church, can’t see the forest for the trees! We suffer useful idiots like Michael Pfleger! Those welcoming and accepting national benefits applaud his antics, while practical, pragmatic Catholics turn their backs on his insufferable dogma because it offends our historic sensibilities and our heritage of reasonable, community humanistics. Self-sufficiency, idealistic pragmatism and independence will win the day every time. Pfleger shall not deter our faith or offset our magnanimous intent without our protest. If the Archdiocese cannot or will not curtail Pfleger’s words or deeds, then they, too should suffer the wrath of the congregation. How ignorant they are!

Posted by: Raymond C. Dean | May 30, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

We all have our opinions but the truth is you ARE judged by the company you keep. And the pattern that is emerging is that the company that Senator Obama keeps is extremely unsavory. I’m sure the Democratic Party would like all of these characters to go away and for all of us to forget what we’ve seen and heard. I’m also sure the Republican Party, after the nomination is set in stone, will use this to their full advantage. And so they should. These associations are not only distasteful but extremely dangerous for this country.

Posted by: js | May 30, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

This man cannot be a Catholic priest. No true Catholic would even consider supporting Obama. Obama’s record is in consistent and deep contrast to the ideals, dogma, and mandates of the Catholic church. If Obama were Catholic, he would be excommunicated, as should this nutjob of a priest. The real Catholic’s choice (only choice): McCain.

Posted by: Johnny | May 30, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

HeHeHe, we are witnessing the greatest implosion of the Democratic Party sine 69. The battles between the left wing loons and the moderates in the party are just ripping it apart.
I just love the fact that BO supporters claim voting for McCain will be 4 more years of Bush because of their similar political association, but claim we should just ignore BO’s association with race baiters and America haters. Now that’s what I call talking out of 2 sides of your mouth, what a joke. If half of your friends are drug addicts or pedophiles, I would say it’s a safe bet you’re of the same class or at least condone such behavior.
It’s the moderates and independents that are going to determine the GE, and if BO gets the nod it’s going to be a blood bath in the GOP favor. I for one hope that is the outcome, I’m sick of paying higher taxes for a larger bureaucratic federal government.

Posted by: NomoreaDem | May 31, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I guess the time has come, or will come after he has had about 5 days to think about it, for Obama to make another big tele-prompter speech. He can again tell us how it is all white America’s fault.
And how we need a national dialogue on why we ever question anything about his life, or his associations. It is all our fault because we are just not sophisticated enough to understand.
Then he can assure us again that he didn’t know Wright, Pfleger, or even wonderful ol’ Louis F, hated white people, . That they never in 20 years discussed race or politics.
Point out again that the only racist person in his life that he has ever been aware of was his white grandmother.
That he didn’t know Ayers liked to blow stuff up.
Or that Tony liked to own people using terrorist money.
Nor the fact that Michelle had never in her life been proud or happy as an American.
Etc., Etc., Etc.

Posted by: West Texas | May 31, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

It is true that the company you keep says something about you. It is even worse, as someone noted here, that the UCC congregation cheered the priest.
And this idea that anyone who does not support Obama is automatically a racist is absolute nonsense. I’m tired of hearing that from Obama supporters.
It should also be noted that if Catholics followed the church’s doctrines, there would be a heck of a lot more of them – so even though priests might have supported Kennedy, I wouldn’t give that much credence.
As a former UCC member, I’m sorry to say I’m not surprised by anything happening in Trinity UCC. I left because not only were they self-righteous, they were arrogant about it, my favorite example being a minister who announced at communion that “unlike other churches, we welcome anyone who calls himself a Christian.”
The new Trinity minister is every bit as bad as the Rev. Wright.
Is there anyone who is not black that the members of that church will not attack and cheer? If that is not racism, sexism, and ageism, I don’t know what is.

Posted by: Fed up in Washington | May 31, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

To Greg in Seattle:
To answer your question, yes – these things drip, drip, drippig out are causing me to examine my choices carefully. As someone who has pulled the lever for a democrat in every single election since 1980, I initially supported John Edwards and then switched to Hillary when he dropped out. I have resigned myself to Obama being the democratic candidate and thought I could vote for him, but now I’m not so sure.
I have been reading everything I can on Obama’s background, starting with his first run for the Illinois Senate. Truthfully, what I am seeing is not something I like. He was able to run unopposed in his first primary by challanging the qualifying petitions of his competitors by employing an army of lawyers and volunteers to question each signature on the petition. If that didn’t work, they questioned who had circulated the petitions. Hardball politics, to say the very least.
Looking at his background in Chicago, he also certainly has a number of friends, acquaintences and supporters with somewhat unsavory histories – Rezko, Ayres, Dorhn, Pfleger, etc. Much of the legislation he was credited with pushing through the Illinois Senate was given to him by the leader of that chamber, a close personal friend of Rev. Wright, much to the chagrin and anger of his collegues in the Senate.
I am also very uncomfortable with his membership in Trinity. After reading as much as possible about that particular church and its teachings, I do not consider it a “mainstream” church. The church is “unrepentedly” Afro-centric and follows Black Liberation theology, which says whites are oppressors and are essentially the Anti-Christ. He can disavow and distance himself as much as wants, but twenty years of membership seems to indicate something about his true feelings and mind set. When you don’t agree with the tenor of your church, you leave. It’s as simple as that. I left my church when I disagreed with what I thought was a political stance it had taken concerning gay marriage during the 2004 election. It wasn’t easy, but it was the principle and it was the right thing to do. I haven’t been back since then.
I now find myself in a quandry. I just do not think I can vote for Obama, nor do I think I can bring myself to vote for John McCain. I will be left with only two choices – stay home in November or write in Hillary Clinton’s name. My choices are disappointing, to say the least.

Posted by: Lynne | May 31, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

I was raised Catholic and seen priests come and go through out the years, NOT once did I ever hear a sermon so disgraceful or dark politic rhetoric. No wonder women cannot be priests, no wonder a few phedophiles sneak through the religion cracks, abortions, priests cannot marry…Priests too busy butting into primary election campaigns. Pfleger reeks with disappointment; he should be tarred and feathered and flogged. Obama, BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER!

Posted by: Natalie | May 31, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Dear Aussie:
This priest is an unpaid staff member on Obama’s campaign. THAT’s what’s wrong with it. Andit is unmitigated racism, sexism, ageism, and arrogance. Those of us who have been on the front lines advancing minority causes all our lives don’t appreciate being treated with such disdain. I recognize that Obama can win without us, and I’m sure he can. The fact that it is so calculated makes it even worse.
Besides, Obama is promising change and failing mightily, just as your newest leader has done. The phoniness and discrimination are the issues here.
Ridiculing anyone at all, for whatever reason, is cruel. Why should anyone be ridiculed? I find the laughter in the audience extremely disturbing. Is that what we can expect in an Obama presidency?

Posted by: Fed up in Washington | May 31, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Fed up in Washington,
I asked a simple question I havent insulted you, your nation or your leaders.
“Obama is promising change and failing mightily, just as your newest leader has done.”
Our PM Kevin Rudd is doing a great job he has an aproval raiting of 72% so I fail to see how he is failing ?
I guess what I will take from you is that you dont have an answer for the question. Because I have already seen In the newspapers here that he is not a staff member he is a long time friend and was part of Obama’s spirtual outreach group.
I understand that how and what he said wasnt the best but Hillary did the same thing to Obama with that speech mocking Barack “Celestial Choirs” will sing and so on.. he will wave a magic wound and so on. There is no way Obama would aprove of what this man said besides being wrong it isnt helpful to Obama.
Or do you think Obama put him up to it ?
If you did for what gain?

Posted by: Aussie | May 31, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am

My big question is this: How many who voted for Obama prior to the proliferation of the Rev. Wright video wish for their vote back? How many would’ve voted for Hillary instead? What if Obama finds that Penn, WV and KY weren’t a fluke – the hard way?

Posted by: JT | May 31, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Since Obama cannot say negative things about Hillary, bho uses his supporters to do it, like rev.wright and father pfleger. And then pretend denounced them……This guy is tricky.

Posted by: Gee | May 31, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

The company someone chooses to keep is a measure of the person. It has been reported by Lynn Sweet of the Chicago SunTimes that Senator Obama has known the priest for years and was considered a friend by Obama. In addition, he was affiliated with Obama’s campaign as an advisor until a few weeks ago.
This calls into question at least 3 important issues: Senator Obama’s judgment; whether Senator Obama agrees with the views of those he has chosen to include in his campaign; and whether this further calls into question Senator Obama’s electability.

Posted by: dreffein | May 31, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Obama pretend to be a sweet, nice and clean guy. This guy is tricky, he used his supporters to say bad things about his opponents, McCain or Clinton.

Posted by: gee | May 31, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

What does the Pope have to say about this?

Posted by: Me | May 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

It is the job of the Cardinal to keep his ducks in line. One has to wonder how a priest who has been arrested “dozens of times” and who speaks so disgracefully from the pulpit can be allowed to continue. Cardinal Francis George needs a kick in the seat of the pants from the Vatican if necessary to make him do his job and send this guy to his room. Right now I’d have to say that Pfleger is not just an embarassment, but a real turnoff to Christ loving Catholics.

Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

There is much truth in what Father Pfleger says; too bad he seems not troubled by Obama’s support of abortion.

Posted by: Jon | May 31, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Obama has now resigned from his church. Sadly, it appears that it’s views and feelings were acceptable for so many years, but is tossed aside when it may stand in the way of his rise to power.

Posted by: WhatAMess | May 31, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

The Catholic Church is used to give a “slap in the wrist” to priests who deviate. It is time for Cardinal George to ‘act’ instead of just accepting “a promise not to do it again.”
As I browsed all the above comments, it is sad to read how much division this priest has promoted and reinforced. Jesus’s disciples are supposed to bring unity, peace and harmony.

Posted by: MJoe | May 31, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Ok I have read all these comments. Most are exactly what I hoped for. I have been reading so many comments from other sections political punch..those have scared me. As most of you I agree. RED FLAGS are a flyin over Obama. Since most of you said the same thing about being around and involved for 20 years and must have the same beliefs.
SO I will move on to this. THere was a nation once, that was stricken with hard times. THe people wanted a change and wanted to believe in something better. As this man spoke he captivated his audiance. The promise of a new life. A new more powerful nation. One that would give hope and make all proud once again. People put faith in this speaker. They wanted to believe in his words of hope. They wanted to feel good about not only themselves but their country. He inspired so many. In time he was their leader. The changes came, people found themselves feeling proud, believing in honor and living with a new sense of pride. With each passing year the changes came. Soon people became not only ignorant, but became arrogant, and the feeling of superior to others overwhelmed them. Lets not forget what this lead to. The death of millions. A nation so evil and brutal to their fellow man that it is unforgivable what took place in their promis of change. It took a world war to end this mans promis of change and hope for a new stronger country. Lets not be blind as the people of this country was. LEts not let our tuff economy, our struggling lives mis lead us into believing a capaign sloggin about change, about hope. Lets really open our eyes and see him for what he really is. A wolf in sheeps clothing.
As far as the priest….I am sorry that the catholic stance was so little. Im ashamed that they allow him to wear uniform of a man of god. God does not judge people by color. Nor does or did he ever teach about hate. I hope that the church will re think its stance on him and removed this man. FOr surly he is a man of god,only a man of racist beliefs. God warned us of pretenders of the cloth.
I hope that more and more people will look at Obama’s friends. Lets look at his raising and his 20 years of faithful service in a church that preaches seperation and hate. Lets remember those who served to protect this country 65 years ago. Lets not allow this country to be ashamed of our future and have to live with regret. We have the power to correct this error in judgement prior to knowing who Obama really is now. Lets send his church and his followers a message that we will not be a bunch of puppets to be lead with fancy speaches.

Posted by: paul | May 31, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

paul | May 31, 2008 10:13:33 PM:
Good, thoughtful post!
Thank you.

Posted by: think about it! | May 31, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Be careful who you wish for….. your wish list is getting VERY VERY s m a l l
and the D N C isn’t even democratic!
I will never vote for a man who cannot win even O N E election honestly!!

Posted by: questioner | May 31, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

To answer the writer’s last question (“heard a cleric engage in such disdainful mockery from a pulpit”):
EMPHATICALLY YES!!
Now….the question is, is what he said TRUE????!!!!

Posted by: Galen from DC | June 1, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

New Pfleger quote from last Sunday: “America is the greatest sin to God.”
!!!
————-
Black liberation theology: All white people are the oppressors and need to be defeated by any means necessary; America is evil, US govt is evil, capitalism is evil, and the middle class are the enemy. Any God that loves white people should be killed. Israel is to be hated because Jews are really not the “chosen people”–blacks are. The USA is the greatest evil and terrorist state of all. Israel must be gone. Palestine must win. The UK only means imperialism and so does the USA.
–The USA should be “destroyed”–Malcolm X.
–”America needs to be burned down.”–Farrakhan
–”GD America. US of KKK of A”–Pastor Wright
–”America is the greatest sin against God”-Pfleger
–”America is downright mean.”–Michelle Obama
There is obviously a PATTERN of HATE for the USA and Barack Obama should not be anywhere CLOSE to the White House!!!
You throw in Bill Ayers who declared war on America via bombings and terror….
WHY is this being allowed to happen?
____
BTW, Rashid Khalidi / Obama connection was on Hannity’s America last night. Khalidi hates Israel and worked for the terrorist organization the Palestinian Liberation Organization and worked for the Palestinian press agency, and he and his wife were spokespeople for Arafat.

Posted by: Mark | June 2, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

The actions and comments made my Rev. Pfleger in the past weeks are dispictable. I have grown up Catholic and while the church has not reacted to some wrong doings by the clergy I and still Catholic and feel that this Rev. should no longer be a member of the Catholic church. His comment’s and just his general way of “preaching” do not and will never fit in the ways of the Catholic church. He should be fired and never speak as a Catholic priest ever again.

Posted by: rkcpope | June 2, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

I am a life-long Chicagoan, a 50 year old cradle Catholic and father of 5 children. During the last 5 or more years I have been focusing on evangelization and apologetics. I consider myself to be a devout and Orthodox Catholic.
Of all the newspaper articles, web and TV and radio commentaries that I have seen, heard and read, no one has focused on the central issue of Catholic Theology, specifically, the fact that Catholicism teaches that abortion is one of the five non negotiable issues for Catholic voters. Abortion is an intrinsically evil action.
Now the fact that Fr Pfleger, a Catholic priest, endorses a pro-abortion (including partial-birth abortion) candidate is concern in itself. (Also, wasn’t Pfleger a prominent member of “Catholics for Obama”?) By endorsing a pro-abortion candidate Pfleger is de facto endorsing the intrinsically evil act of abortion, and any other evil in which Obama may believe.
In my opinion, Pfleger is not in communion with the Catholic Church!
Why has the Church hierarchy allowed this renegade priest to remain in his role as a priest in the Catholic faith? What has happened to the standards of the Church? What is God thinking about His Church and the leadership here in the Chicago area? Why is the Church allowing this “Cafeteria Catholic Priest” to influence and confuse the flock??? Why hasnt the Church hierarchy denounced and renounced Pfleger’s anti-Catholic beliefs? It is not relevant to argue that Pfleger is allowed to stay in his position as pastor simply because his parishoners like him. What does matter is Fleger’s willingness to conform to the teachings of the Catholic faith, some of which may not be popular in secular society but nonetheless are true. Fr Pfleger’s parishoners are being deceived and misled away from the true teachings of the Catholic faith by the mere fact that Pfleger is actively endorsing a Pro-Abortion candidate. How can he or ANY Catholic vote for Clinton OR Obama? Why is the Church NOT standing up for the truth by stating that NO Catholic is allowed to support any candidate for any political office who endorses abortion??
Is it any mystery why so many Catholics are tepid, cafeteria Catholics? Is it any wonder why so many are leaving the Catholic Church???

Posted by: WJL | June 2, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

The likes of Pfleger have no place in the Catholic religion I grew up knowing.
He needs to be ousted.

Posted by: ems | June 12, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Every Catholic needs to email the Archdiocese about Pfleger. I just did, he needs defrocked and excommunicated. The Church’s silence is deafening and they wonder why we don’t attend Mass anymore. The abuse of children and now this.

Posted by: Pat | October 28, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.