Bill Clinton: In Defense of Michigan and Florida
ABC’s Sarah Amos Reports: Bill Clinton continues to campaign hard for his wife in the remaining primary states, spending more and more time reiterating the importance of seating the Florida and Michigan delegates.
Today, at the first of five campaign events in Kentucky, just days ahead of the May 20 primary here, the former president said the lack of attention to the unseated Michigan and Florida delegates was proof that the party and the political pundits are trying to force Democrats to get in line behind Obama.
Over the past few days Clinton has frequently focused on the delegate controversy in his campaign remarks, going on about how the primary scheduling flap that resulted in the party and the campaigns’ boycotting primaries in those states, has effectively disenfranchised millions of voters.
"What did the Democratic National Committee do? They obliterated them. Who cares if you wanted to get up there with these other states because you’ve been broken by this economic policy of the current administration. We’re gonna show you who’s boss. We are obliterating you from the face of the earth and pretending that your voters did not vote. You just have to know, that is the position of your national party. Nobody quarrels with their right to discipline them. They made a decision they did not have to make. And do you seriously believe, if the votes had been the other way, that they would have made the same decision?" Clinton asked a crowd in Owensboro.
The Clinton campaign did not criticize the party’s decision to boycott campaigning in Michigan and Florida when the primaries were held in those states.
The former President also continues to spend time on the campaign trail accusing Senator Barack Obama of not following the rules set by the Democratic party in Florida to avoid all campaigning in that state after it moved its primary date ahead in the calendar against the wishes of the partg. Clinton says that when Obama bought national campaign ads, he did so because he knew they would play in the Florida television market and influence the voters there, despite the party ban on campaigning in the sunshine state.
"Her opponent, now seeking to disembody Florida, buys national cable television and says ‘oh, I’m sorry it got into Florida but I had to buy national cable television.’ Nobody buys national television for any reason, there is no conceivable reason to do it other than to advertise. And I believe there was also some television in south Georgia. So only one candidate broke the rules. She still won by 295,000 votes, 17 percent," said Clinton.
Many political observers see the inclusion of Florida and Michigan in the delegate and popular vote totals as the last argument Hillary Clinton has to challenge Obama for the Democratic nomination.

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Someone should have Bill Clinton read the articles on ABC News.
The more Bill talks, the more I realize how out of touch with reality he is.
Posted by: Debbie | May 16, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
What happened to the comments that were already here? Spooky….Anyway, that is exactly it Bill! The voters are being ripped off by the very party who wants their support. That’s why I am a New Independent after being a Democrat volunteer all my adult life. I owe the DNC nothing if all they are going to do is squash our voice for their choice. Why make us go through all the primaries then? Why not just step out in the beginning and tell us “Okay this is the one we are providing for you. Vote in the general. Come on Hillary let’s split to a third party, you have the numbers…..
Posted by: irma | May 16, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Talk Bill! TALK OUT LOUD! We love you so keep talking and telling it like it is!
Posted by: irma | May 16, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Just count the VOTES! It doesn’t matter who they benefit! COUNT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE’S VOTE-THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS!
Posted by: cc | May 16, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Wow this man just needs to…just…you know…Whatever…Many people DIDN’T vote because of what they were told about the penalties…So why should the votes count now when these people decided to stay home
this is just an usurpation…May be some people would have voted either for Obama or Edwards IF their names were…Someone who voted once just CAN’T revote that’s why Obama didn’t agree with a new orgaznization of the vote!!!I saw the interview of Mr WOLFson director of HRC campaign on another big tv channel…maaaannn.A MASTERPIECE of DENIAL concerning the DNC rules …wow …impressive!truly!!
Posted by: Avembe | May 16, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Just give it all to HIllary. She still does not win.
If they count their vote as popular and give the race to Hillary because maybe she might have more popular votes then I, here in Iowa want to be able to go and vote and have mine count also. So would how many more states who do not have primaries?
Posted by: Becky | May 16, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Let the people choose…It’s time for American to send a message that this is a government that was formed “By the People, For the People.”
Primaries, Delegates and Super-Delegates have led us astray from that concept. Think about it, that’s how we got Bush as President.
Send a message to the Democratic Party, Vote for Hillary Clinton as a write-in candidate.
Hillary is the candidate that we need today…she has a proven track record of working for the People
Posted by: Peggy | May 16, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
It’s true that some implicit forces force the Dem. superdelegates to unite behind Obama ——– the weaker candidate. Someones may have hidden agenda, that they intentionally wish to have a weak Dem. party nominee, then they can control him, or they can run presidency in 2012.
I have waited so many years to see a real smart, capable person to be US. president, but I’m so disappointed to see Obama’s favored.
Posted by: golfgirlusa | May 16, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
This is just so sad especially when you contrast it to how Sen. Clinton has been campaigning the last day or two in such a positive issue based manner.
Either her husband didn’t get the memo or he is fighting a different fight than his candidate. It’s unfortunate if his ego causes her legacy to be irreparably harmed.
Posted by: Mary | May 16, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Oh please Bill………. Get a life !!!
Can’t you see the writing on the wall, the Clinton’s are DONE !!!
Obama ’08
Posted by: Jan | May 16, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
YOU CANNOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS! First Hillary voted against Florida & Michigan being counted and now because she is all but lost,she wants to count them.She has also cut down Obama for going by the very rules she voted for!!!! Hillary needs to stop being a whinny little rich girl & poor,poor, loser!!
Posted by: Maria Kirchner | May 16, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
I am a native of Florida and I am sorely disappointed that my vote in the primary election doesn’t count or matter. We, the people of Florida are being punished and penalized because the powers at be changed the date of the primary election. I am being FORCED to support Obama or vote Republican in the general election. I don’t take kindly to being forced to do anything —– so here’s to the DNC, I’ll vote for McCain. The DNC obviously doesn’t think my vote is important.
Posted by: barby | May 16, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Listen, WV is not a big deal – NOT AT ALL!!!!
And this is why, just take a look at this:
Obama Blowouts
By tonnyb – May 13, 2008, 8:56PM
To put things in perspective, here is a review of past primaries and causcuses where Obama blew out Clinton.
State – Obama – Hillary
Idaho 82.2% 17.8%
Hawaii 76.2% 23.8%
District of Columbia 75.8% 24.2%
Alaska 74.6% 25.4%
Kansas 74.2% 25.8%
Washington 68.4% 31.6%
Georgia 68.1% 31.9%
South Carolina 67.6% 32.4%
Minnesota 67.4% 32.6%
Colorado 67.3% 32.7%
Illinois 66.3% 33.7%
Virginia 64.2% 35.8%
North Dakota 62.6% 37.4%
Mississippi 62.2% 37.8%
Maryland 61.9% 38.1%
Wyoming 61.9% 38.1%
Louisiana 61.7% 38.3%
Vermont 60.6% 39.4%
Posted with 4% West Virginia results reported
And the guy got about 28 delegates b/4 WV. Add 6 to that , he surpasses Clinton. Then he’s got some more after. I am a Hillary fan, but let’ be realistic, this guy is winning big. I will vote him over any republican.
However, Obama said he will go back and speak with WV. I believe that when they get to understand him, when they get to understand that we are not voting skin color preferences, democrats will all be on the same train. We can’t have another Bush term.
Posted by: S Anderson | May 16, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Wake Up America! Obama will lose in November
America, America, God shed his grace on thee.
Then why are we letting an anti-American, unpatriotic, charlatan who stated from his own lips before speaking to a packed crowd in North Carolina, “Watch me wow these white folks” be our nominee?
Obama will lose in November and all because we, America allowed a few spoken words to woo the White House away from us.
His associations show us Obama lacks judgment: Antoin Rezko, William Ayers, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Iraqi born Aiham Alsammarae, the former electricity minister convicted of corruption in Iraq.
I suppose under God’s guidance, since I lived through the Bush years, I will survive this fool’s one four year term unscathed if America allows this fraud into the White House.
70% of we Democrats will not vote for Obama; however, since Michigan and Florida do not count I suppose our voices do not either.
Without Hillary Clinton on the top of the ticket, with or without the loser Edwards on the fraudulent Obama ticket ( the true source of race baiting in this countries primary-with Jesse Jackson, Jr. being the race-baiting architect), Obama will NEVER get my vote.
I’d rather be a McCain Democrat than see the fraudulent, mob backed, media created Manchurian candidate Obama in the White House.
“Keep in mind what Dan Morain wrote in the September 8, 2007, Los Angeles Times:
“Now, promoting himself as a fresh face on the national political stage, proclaiming his distance from lobbyists and the Washington culture of special interests, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has to contend with his own history. … From Chicago to Springfield, his past is filled with decidedly old-school political tactics — a history of befriending powerful local elders, assisting benefactors and special interests, and neutralizing rivals.”
Oh, yes, and did we mention, Obama’s name also appears on the witness list for the current Antoine Rezko trial, making his one more in what former Illinois U.S. Sen. Peter Fitzgerald called the “Illinois Combine”.
For more Obama old style politics information, log on to http://www.zimbio.com/Obamamania/articles/366/One+degree+separation+Obama+Illinois+Combine
That’s all we Democrats need this year is an indicted Democratic nominee! For more Obama old style politics information, also log on to http://www.opednews.com
Once you read these articles you will find how Obama took money from Iraqi born Aiham Alsammarae, the former electricity minister convicted of corruption in Iraq, who put up $2.7 million in property to help raise $8.5 million to free Tony Rezko from jail in Chicago.
The Times reported that Alsammarae had contributed six times to Obama’s presidential campaign, and if Rezko had not been caught and indicted Obama and Michelle “I hate America” Robinson Obama would have profited from building nuclear power plants in Iraq the country we are at war with.
This is not borne out of racism; for I am an African American, female, informed Democrat.
With Obama in the White House and his radical, leftist, socialistic, unpatriotic and often over-bearing and speaking ill of America spouse at his side, we will need less Reverend Wright inspired teachings, Antoin Rezko and William Ayers friendships, and most certainly, less architect of race-baiting Jesse Jackson, Jr. and the Illinois Combine old style politics, and more of the true and living God’s spirit in this country.
With Obama in the White House God Bless America will not be a phrase, but will become a prayer.
Posted by: informed democrat | May 16, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Fact (including double counting in Texas that favors BHO):
HRC: 16,691,639
BHO: 16,648,060
I don’t care who you choose based on DNC’s phony rules, but a true Jeffersonian democracy counts votes, by the rule of one person one vote.
Posted by: Olbermn3 | May 16, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Bill has really forgotten what it means to honor an agreement!!
Posted by: jld1959 | May 16, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Obama won 10 AA boosted “black” states and 6 red states from primaries and 13 states from caucus
Hillary won 18 states (most of blue states) from primaries and 1 state from caucus
Clearly Obama dominated in caucus but Hillary won most states from primaries….
Posted by: True Truth | May 16, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
HRC: 16,691,639
BHO: 16,648,060
Hillary has the popular vote. The DNC with able maneuvering by Nancy Pelosi and the MSM takes the victory away. The Republicans win in the General Election because of defections from the Democrats angered over a corrupt process and rampant sexism.
Lysistrata 2008. Make them eat their campaign signs.
Posted by: len | May 16, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
The dems have decided to lose this election. I think it is time we break up the democratic party and start a separate party. The democratic party has become the vehicle to hijack teh nation by the communists and African Americans (yes, Obama’s core bases).
Posted by: Roger Miller | May 16, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Too bad, DNC has rules to supersize the elitists such that one equals 15000 votes.
Posted by: Boneheaded, Chicago | May 16, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Remember how Chris Cilizza, William Bennett and others were pumping Obama up on CNN and MSNBC? Well, they’re doing it for Bush now. Except they refer to Bush as “The President”. Told you people; They wanted Obama for Bush. Luckily, Hillary is up 40+ in Kentucky and up in double digets for Puerto Rico. Hillary isn’t that far behind in Oregon it’s like 10 pts.
Posted by: irma | May 16, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Unless MI and FL votes are considered, there’s always going to be an asterisk next to presumptive nominee Obama’s name.
Context defines rules … when the context changes, the rules should too. DNC felt they’d scheduled in such a way that a nominee would be clear early on. That didn’t happen. To refuse to seat delegates in the closest race in American politics is ridiculous.
Posted by: Sara | May 16, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Sara, love your “context defines rules”!
Posted by: irma | May 16, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
With Obama in the White House God Bless America will not be a phrase, but will become a prayer.
Posted by: informed democrat
Wow, for someone considering themselves a informed democrat, that has to be single handedly the most biased, moronic posting this week. Tell the truth, you’re just a republican troll worried about Hillary losing, because Obama going to empty a lot of republican seats if he wins.
Posted by: Larry | May 16, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
There’s lot that Sen. Barack Obama has in common with George W. Bush. Bill Clinton is abslouetly right to point out that it was always the Republicans who get blamed for this sort of thing, for placing more and more barriers on people’s right to vote in a democracy such as ours. Sen. Barack Obama not only manupulated causues with a help of small groups of zealots, but also effectively blocked the re-vote of Florida and Michigan. And when it comes to disenfranchising American voters─ no other person knows more about this subject than our former Vice-President Al Gore. It is ironic we just witnessed the same thing happen to Hillary Clinton, that happened to Al Gore in November 2000. I amazed that the preventing Michigan and Florida vote thus disfranchising millions of Democratic voters reminds me of the Supreme Court Handing over Florida vote to George Bush. In this new era of new politics that’s promised by Sen. Obama, can this really happen, or is this politics as usual– circa Florida 2000? And as usual the whole Washington media establishment was silent, more or less abandoning their responsibility of safeguarding the rights of the people to vote in a democracy such as ours; neglecting their role to say the obvious. The fact that Sen. Obama’s lawyers had successfully block the re-voting of Michigan and Florida. Mr. David Brooks points out in his (3-25-08) column in The New York Times “Obama lawyers successfully prevented re-votes in Florida and Michigan.” This important statement was buried in otherwise as usual pro Obama piece that sees things for Sen. Obama’s favor in an obviously stalemated Democratic primary contest. But what disturbed me was the fact that David Brooks and other political writes in the media establishment seemed to have little regard for democratic process? The more Sen. Obama strains to speak of his new era of politics in America, less and less of it seemed real. Sen. Obama should practice what he preaches so blatantly and the presidential primary campaign is a good place to start…I think Al Gore should endorse Hilly Clinton.
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 16, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Come on Hillary leave the dirty Democrats in the dust, run Independent. They did nothing for me after a lifetime of being one of them. You don’t owe them a thing. Hillary or McCain
Posted by: KittyCat | May 16, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
UNBELIEVABLE! Hillary agreed to the sanctions when the determination was made by the DNC and now she wants to change the game?!! I too am upset by the delegate loss from MI and FL, but the onus is upon the state party machines for ignoring the warnings from Dean and company if they chose to move their primaries ahead! Let’s place the responsibility for this fiasco where it belongs… Any attempt to fairly distribute these delegates now can only damage this party further.
Posted by: doug | May 16, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Remember when Bill was complaining in NH about Obama not getting vetted by the media. He is right afterall…If only these Rev. Wright, Ayers, Rezko issues were brought up before Iowa, Hillary should have been the nominee by this time.
Posted by: Steve K | May 16, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Remember when Bill was complaining in NH about Obama not getting vetted by the media. He is right afterall…If only these Rev. Wright, Ayers, Rezko issues were brought up before Iowa, Hillary should have been the nominee by this time.
Posted by: Steve K | May 16, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
The party leadership of Michigan & Florida knew the party rules when they advanced the dates of their primaries. Obama, rightly following the rules didn’t even appear on the Michigan ballot. The Democrats, ever spineless, are for some reason terrified of a convention where something is actually decided. Conventions have decided candidates for many years now. They have become so boring of late that they are not worth watching, except perhaps for a few key speeches. Let the process work. Let the primaries be run. Let the Credentials Committee decide if the Democratic Party will follow its own rules. Let the delegates vote. The proceedure has been in place for years now. I’m no Hillary fan but at least she has backbone.
Posted by: Robert A. Pell | May 16, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
IF THEY VOTED IT SHOULD BE COUNTED! TO ALL THE OBAMA FANS SHUT THE HELL UP! IF IT WAS THE OTHER WAY AROUND HILL SUPPORTERS WOULD HAVE TO GET OVER IT! REGARDLESS IF HILL LOSES OR WINS THESE PEOPLE GOT OUT AND VOTED AND BET YOUR BUTT IF YOU DON’T COUNT THEM OBAMA OR HILARY WILL LOSE TO MCCAIN PERIOD! GROW UP DEMOCRATS! THIS IS ABOUT ELECTING A DEMOCRAT NOT A REPUBLICAN AND IT WAS A REPUBLICAN THAT MADE THOSE RULES AND ALSO IOWA AND NEW HAMPSHIRE AND OTHERS MOVED THERE DATES UP WHY DON’T WE TAKE AWAY THEIR VOTES!
Posted by: christy | May 16, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Barack Obama himself, but now playing the role of George Bush in the sly with such skill! Sen. Barack Obama obviously has so much more in common with George Bush than meets the eye; it is said they are even very distant relatives; well, I’m not surprised! And as usual the whole Washington media establishment was silent, more or less abandoning their responsibility of safeguarding the rights of the people to vote in a democracy such as ours; ditching their role─ to say the obvious. Sen. Obama’s lawyers had successfully blocked the re-voting of Michigan and Florida. I amazed that the preventing Michigan and Florida vote didn’t seem to bother anyone in the whole Washington media establishment one bit; not even that MSNBC motor- mouth Keith Dobermann. In this new era of new politics that’s promised by Sen. Obama, can this really happen, or is this politics as usual– circa Florida 2000? The more Sen. Obama strains to speak of his new era of politics in America, less and less of it seemed real. Sen. Obama should practice what he preaches so blatantly and the presidential primary campaign is a good place to start…I think, it’s only just that Al Gore should endorse Sen. Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 16, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
While I have sympathy for the voters in Michigan and Florida, I feel their just anger is headed in the wrong direction.
Citizens in both states should not be angry at the DNC. The DNC created primary guidelines that everyone agreed to abide by, including the Democrat leaders in MI and FL. If the voters in these states lose their primary votes, its not the fault of the DNC, but instead the fault of the individual Democrat leaders in those two states who decided they could ‘break the rules.’ If I were a resident of either state, I would vote out any and all Democrat leaders who voted to move the primaries before February 5th.
Bill Clinton is trying to play this off as a fault of the entire democrat leadership, when quite actually, the leadership of these two states is solely to blame.
The Clintons are now a danger to the Democratic party and are trying to place a wedge in it. Funny since Hillary also voted for the February primaries.
They broke the rules. They pay the price. Nobody can take away their votes in November, and that is the utmost importance.
Posted by: Jim | May 16, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Will someboby please explain to me why a Loser like Howard Dean became the head of DNC…YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Posted by: Ronnie | May 16, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Ok, do not count the vote and I will be the first person to cross over to McCain and vote for him in November.
So will millions of angry disenchanged people in FL and MI.
Welcome McCain!
Posted by: Stacey | May 16, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Count the votes and convince the superdelegates to vote for Clinton. It’s the only change Democrats have to win in November and save the Supreme Court. Obama is a fraud.
Posted by: Andrew Austin | May 16, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Something else I just discovered today…the latest mathmatics:
http://12counts.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/why-obama-wont-count-the-votes-hillarys-winning/
Obama, you and your campaigners are cheating!
Posted by: Di | May 16, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
FAT ASS BILL IS AT IT AGAIN. SPREADING LIES, SAYING ANYTHING HE HAS TO TO GET HILARY ELECTED SUCH AS HIS POSITION ON FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN. HE CONVIENTLY FORGETS THAT HILARY VOTED IN FAVOR OF NOT SEATING THE MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA DELAGATES (WHEN SHE WAS AHEAD IN THE RACE) BECAUSE THESE TWO STATES CHOSE TO HOLD THEIR PRIMARIES EARLY.
ALSO, LETS NOT FORGET THAT ON 10/10/07 HILARY STATED, (REGARDING THE MICHIGAN PRIMARY) “IT’S CLEAR, THIS ELECTION THEY’RE HAVING IS NOT GOING TO COUNT FOR ANYTHING.”
YOU CLINTONS, ALL THREE OF YOU, DON’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT PEOPLES VOTING RIGHTS. ALL YOU CARE ABOUT IS WINNING THE WHITE HOUSE ANYWAY YOU CAN.
WELL, ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. HILARY WILL BE LUCKY IF SHE GETS ELECTED DOGCATCHER. HER POLITICAL CAREER IS OVER, BILLS LEGACY IS IN RUINS AND POOR CHELSE HAS TO LIVE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE THAT HER PARENTS ARE SLIME.
REGARDING THE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN VOTERS WHO ARE NOW COMPLAING…THEIR ELECTED OFFICIALS MADE A DECISION, RIGHT OR WRONG AND THEY MUST NOW LIVE WITH IT. THE HELL WITH THEM.
Posted by: BOO-HOO | May 16, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
SEAT FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN OR LOSE IN THE GENERAL TO MCCAIN!
Posted by: BR | May 16, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
The Clintons are silly. Can you imagine after a ball game is lost you argue that you got more cheers and the rules are not fair and that you should be declared winner despite loosing it on the scores? Just plain silly. What they are doing is a national embarrassment and disgrace.
Posted by: pete | May 16, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Tear it up, Bill. Tear it up. Your wife cannot win so you both feel it’s you’re right to tear up the Democratic Party. You stink.
Posted by: Bill | May 16, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Sad that people are going to cross party lines and vote for McCain because the leaders in their own state failed them. The Democratic leaders of Florida and Michigan are responsible for playing craps with the votes of their citizens.
Because your state leaders broke the rules, you’ll cross party lines? Good. We didn’t need you then. We’ll have Florida and Michigan democrats to blame for reversing Roe vs. Wade or inviting the Iraq war to continue.
ITS YOUR OWN LEADERS’ FAULT!! NOT THE ENTIRE NATIONS LEADERS!!
WEAK DEMOCRATS…GO LOVE THE BUSH PARTY!
Posted by: rocko | May 16, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Two things to consider about the primary in Florida that I never hear addressed.
(1)The Clinton’s contend that because the turnout was a couple of million voters, it illustrates how strongly people feel about Hillary as a candidate.
Actually the turnout was high because THERE WAS A PROPERTY TAX REFERENDUM ON THE BALLOT!
Voting for the primary candidate was an afterthought for A LOT of those voters.
Also, despite her pledge not to campaign here in FL. Hillary did make appearances locally before the primary. She says it wasn’t campaigning, but that’s splitting hairs.
(2) The Clinton’s keep talking about how we can’t disenfranchise those people who voted. What about the VASTLY GREATER NUMBER WHO DIDN’T VOTE because we were told that the delegates wouldn’t be seated. I, for one will be very unhappy of they apportion to HRC those delegates, since I specifically chose not to vote due to the DNC’s
declaration.
Posted by: whataplace | May 16, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Such foolishness. I want to know where these ‘popular’ vote counts are coming from? RealClearPolitics.com has a counter up, and the only way Clinton has even a slim margin is if you count Florida and Michigan and don’t take into account all of the people who voted AGAINST them (the Clintons) in Michigan. For God’s sake, people, stop crying because the world is changing and someone other than a Bush or a Clinton isn’t going to be in the White house.
Posted by: Joshua | May 16, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
You know, someone should remind Billy boy Clinton, that his wife voted for those rules at the DNC too. Hillary declared in New Hampshire that MI and Fl. votes did not count and would not be counted for breaking the DNC rules. Then when she won the two states she wanted them to count….ISN’T THAT LIKE CHANGING THE RULES TO FIX YOUR NEEDS??? IF OBAMA HAD WON YOU COULD BE DARN SURE SHE (HILLARY) WOULD BE DOING ALL SHE COULD TO ENFORCE THE RULES….
GUESS IT JUST MAKES A DIFFERENCE WHO WOULD BENEFIT FROM THE VOTES HUH?????
Posted by: Judith | May 16, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Strange that Americans would want to vote in some-one ready to annihilate an entire nation! Even GWB at his fiercest only had a few war-mongering dictators removed from power/tried and hung. 66 MILLION LIVES will be on your heads!
Posted by: will | May 16, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Strange that Americans would want to vote in some-one ready to annihilate an entire nation! Even GWB at his fiercest only had a few war-mongering dictators removed from power/tried and hung. 66 MILLION LIVES will be on your heads!
Posted by: will | May 16, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Boo Frickity Hoo. If Obama won both states Bill Clinton would be on the exact opposite side of the argument. This is all about power and nothing about fairness.
Posted by: Jon | May 16, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I think Bill Clinton has caused more harm than good campaigning for Hillary! Day by day, the facade of Clinton greatness is waning away!
http://klintons.com
Posted by: Bob | May 16, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
JUST REVOTE AND THAT WILL SETTLE THIS.
Posted by: mlb | May 16, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
I can believe they want to exclude voters, didn’t they do all they could to not count the military absentee votes in 2000???
Posted by: Bob | May 16, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Pretty weird that the Democratic Party is treating these two swing states so horribly.
Is it just Howard Dean’s big ego that is wrecking Obama’s changes for a good November turn-out in Michigan and Florida?
Posted by: Mark | May 16, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Hillary,
We need a new party, DNC is too leftist, Republicans are too much on the right. Provide a centrist, because thats what most of america is, and we do not have a choice. Down with people who call for ‘Change’ and play same old dirty politics throughout.
Mcain atleast says what he does, with Obama, its like ‘These are no red states, or blue states, its only united states’ as long as he is the favored one. As soon as someone else becomes a favorite, ‘America needs change’. Do not tell me Obama that America came to be such a great country because of ‘Same Old’ Politics. It did, because it embraces change if it is real and for good. You be the President or not, change continues. So Sorry, and Thank You. Now get out of here and get real.
Posted by: Hillary '08, Hillary '12 | May 16, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Here is the part that I find funny. The Clinton’s have decades of political assets they used to win this election. Hillary started with 30% of the Super Delegates.
Obama was a no-name. Hardly anyone knew he existed.
And yet through his own ability and his good leadership decisions he put together a campaign team that not only kept him in the race but has at this point assured him as the winner.
With all odds stacked up against him he overcame the odds. This is a man who has been overcoming the odds his whole life. He is a highly educated, successful black man and I think that scares people. For me it is a non-issue as the CEO of the large software company I work for is also a black man.
I really wish people would vote with their minds instead of their eye’s and gender. Hillary is an intelligent woman but listening to some women talk about how they are only voting for her because she is a woman. Or others indicating they won’t vote for Obama because he is a ni@@er makes me disgusted with america.
Posted by: TimL | May 16, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Di, check a website that is real if you want REAL numbers.
Hillary IS NOT ahead and you guys need to stop the charade.
Michigan tried to give a delegate split 69-59 to hillary, what happened? she said no. It may end up being a 50/50 split. FL may be seated, but with only half its total. And this is the fairest way to do that since those states decided to jump the process. Hopefully other states will reconsider doing that in the future.
So no Di, Obama and his campaigners are not cheating.
S. Anderson just posted all Obama’s wins, but you all act like they don’t exist. Are these somehow not FULL votes? All I keep hearing about is the states hillary won and West Virginia.
I realize the difficulty, but try to stay fair and honest in this process.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | May 16, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
For all those cry babies!
Florida, Michigan and the Clintons made a a decision.
Now they are trying to turn a mule into a donkey.
Live with it.
_
Posted by: JOEM110 | May 16, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
People won’t vote for Obama because he is the least qualified and incapable to be a president. period..
Posted by: True Truth | May 16, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Hillary should run on her own independent ticket and she would beat McCain and Obama and let the people like Ted kennedy who has never appeared to me to respect women and the others who do not want a women to be presedent see how much power they really have.
Posted by: alta | May 16, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
The hatred for the Clintons within the Democratic Party is amazing. Hillary is by far the one who has the most qualifications for this job and the DNC has done everything possible to stop her from winning this election. Bill and Hillary should become Independents and run on that ticket in NOvember. With so many supporters, she would probably win. Polls are showing that Obama just might lose to McCain in the fall and this is just the beginning. The good ole boys in the Democratic Party have made a huge mistake!lectiongthd sye
Posted by: griffin1944 | May 16, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
what kind of short-sighted idiot takes his name off of a ballot when the state is still going ahead with a vote which could matter?
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
whataplace -
Your comments reflect the typical BO hypocrisy to belittle people who did not vote for him, or things not benefiting himself:
The large turn out in FL primary was not because of voters’ interest in selecting a presidential nominee by defeating BHO; they came out because of taxes.
Do you Obama people really think the American people are as greedy, as stupid as BHO himself, who will do anything and say anything to benefit himself including housing deals with Rezko and ridiculing people “bitter, less-educated” for not voting for him?
Posted by: boneheaded, chicago | May 16, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
tick tock
flip flop
flip flop
THONG!
Seriously, Bill, what is the deal with saying one thing and then doing another?
Posted by: comeonguys | May 16, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
the next time an obama supporter treats Senator Clinton with fairness and honesty will be the first time
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
if the voters of Florida and Michigan are made to feel disrespected, the chances of a Democrat taking the Presidential oath of office in January 2009 is ZERO
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
chris -
The answer is BHO.
Posted by: boneheaded, chicago | May 16, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
I am European but I would like to drop my two cents here. I am appalled with some of the supposed HRC supporters comments here, I cannot believe someone can call themselves democrats and vote for John McCain. I think this people are just undercover republicans trying to divide the democrats with this sort of shameless comments.
But then again, if they are really “democrats” you guys deserve what you get.
Posted by: europe1 | May 16, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
So Americans are suppposed to take Bill Clinton, a serial rapist, sexual harasser, liar who was disbarred for perjury and who was bought and sold by foreign criminals who have financed his Clinton Global Inititative and his “wife’s” campaign for President at his word? The Clintons are the GREAT AMERICAN FRAUD. LYING IS AN ART FORM to these people. Clintons are POLITICAL PREDATORS who prey on the left side of the bell curve and the intellectually undernourished, the spiritually unevolved and broken souls who believe the false promises made to them by these Machiavellian thieves. The only region of this country that still likes Bill & Hillary is APPALACHIA. If those people ever figure out that they have been hustled that will be in the end of the Clintons forever.
Posted by: Christopher London | May 16, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
MI, FL Dem party leaders are the problem but instead of dealing with them the people of MI and FL will vote for McCain.
Posted by: does it mater | May 16, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
bonehead…..so the question must be: who will definitely lose in November?
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Hi all!
Bill Clinton is smart. He speaks from the heart. He’s speaks as an elder–one who prefers to skip the BS and just say it like it is. “Wowing” people doesn’t give him kicks anymore.
He knows what’s going down. We can learn a lot from him, and we won’t have to read between the lines.
Posted by: youbetcha | May 16, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
I agree with those of you who believe Hillary should be a write-in. I’m a Florida voter and am sickened by what the DNC is trying to pull. Obama will never win the general election as many Clinton supporters will write her in or vote McClain. We spoke when we voted in the Florida primary…our voices deserve to be heard the same as the other 49 states! If Obama believes for one minute that the Florida voters will roll over for him…well..he needs to think again…he’s treated us shabbily, like we don’t exist and don’t have a right to! The voters had nothing to do with changing the date.
Go Hillary!
Posted by: Susy | May 16, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Hey sweetie, come here and sit on my lap and I will answer your question.
Posted by: Jim Richmond | May 16, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
christopher london…..given your obvious mental defect, the effect of your long-windedness is negligible…
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
europe1 – stay in Europe, or learn to understand.
Americans do not necessarily simply vote or support an ideology (although I have also to admit they often do).
Posted by: boneheaded, chicago | May 16, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
SENATOR CLINTON FOR NOVEMBER WRITE-IN
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I am a native of Florida and I am sorely disappointed that my vote in the primary election doesn’t count or matter. We, the people of Florida are being punished and penalized because the powers at be changed the date of the primary election. I am being FORCED to support Obama or vote Republican in the general election. I don’t take kindly to being forced to do anything —– so here’s to the DNC, I’ll vote for McCain. The DNC obviously doesn’t think my vote is important.
Posted by: hi | May 16, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I am a native of Florida and I am sorely disappointed that my vote in the primary election doesn’t count or matter. We, the people of Florida are being punished and penalized because the powers at be changed the date of the primary election. I am being FORCED to support Obama or vote Republican in the general election. I don’t take kindly to being forced to do anything —– so here’s to the DNC, I’ll vote for McCain. The DNC obviously doesn’t think my vote is important.
Posted by: hi | May 16, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
chris – I thought you were asking who is an idiot.
Posted by: boneheaded, chicago | May 16, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
by taking his name off the ballot, and then complain about he did not get any votes.
Posted by: boneheaded, chicago | May 16, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
apparently some find it hard to believe that they support a candidate whom they truly believe in rather than give in to harassment, intimidation and false accusations of racism because they won’t agree to support their own candidate who doesn’t always walk the talk he is selling them, but it doesn’t matter because, in their eyes, he is flawless and divine…
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
boneheaded…..you got the right answer on that one as well
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
robert……obama’s inexperience and lack of foresight was the reason why he actively withdrew his name from the ballot in the first place…….such a failure to appreciate the variables of a political campaign, let alone the duties and changing circumstances that constantly face a President, makes him the WRONG choice….
Posted by: chris | May 16, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Hey boneheaded, I do stay in europe :) we do not have a tradition of invading other countries.
Beside we do learned. Unlike there color is not an issue here. Oh, we also follow rules, not really play as we go.
Posted by: europe1 | May 16, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
What is the Messiah afraid of???
Your supporters may have long prostrated, but we STAUNCH supporters of the Steel-Backboned Lady in Red (and sometimes in Blue) will never vote for the “Savior.”
Compare with the people in Guam, he thinks those in Florida and Michigan are trash—or worse yet—just pure parasites.
Mind you, the voters in Florida and Michigan DO pay much, much, much more in taxes than the handful in Guam, which is just the smallest of your 57 States (plus Hawaii and Alaska which you said you had not visited).
Posted by: Brent | May 16, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Hillary Clinton agreed with the DNC, as did all the other Democratic candidates, regarding the treatment of Florida and Michigan once they decided to move up their primaries to unapproved dates. The voters of those states should be angry with their representatives, who were warned repeatedly about the consequences of their unapproved primary dates and yet refused to back down.
The Clinton campaign appeared to have no problem with the sanctioning until Hillary Clinton found herself falling behind in this election. Then we suddenly heard about voter disenfranchisement. Bill Clinton really should focus on his library and foundation. I’ve heard enough lies to last me quite some time.
Posted by: mary | May 16, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
According to Obama, Hillary is Winning
By Bud WhitecloseAuthor: Bud White Name: Joyan and Bud White White
Email: susanunpc@gmail.com
Site:
About: See Authors Posts (20) on May 14, 2008 at 2:23 PM in Barack Obama, DNC, Florida, Hillary Clinton, Michigan, Superdelegates, West Virginia
The Obama campaign has argued that Super Delegates ought to vote in accordance with the “will” of the people. Really? Then let’s run the numbers. Under that metric, who would have a lead in Super Delegates? The Super Delegate total from the states that Hillary has won thus far (including FL and MI) is 418, to Obama’s 372. If the MI delegates are split 50/50, Clinton still wins 403.5 to Obama’s 386.5. If Super Delegates are counted according to Barack’s formula, Hillary wins the nomination. Period.
The numbers are even more impressive after Hillary crushed Obama in West Virginia. WV has 11 Superdelegates. Hillary is now ahead, even if you exclude FL and MI: she leads 374 to Obama’s 372.
http://12counts.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/why-obama-wont-count-the-votes-hillarys-winning/
Posted by: Stacey | May 16, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
@Chris
You must be new to pollitics huh? You and all your shortsighted posts. Hillary and Obama both agreed to the punnishment to both states. They both also agreed to not run in Michigan and Florida. Obama is the one who kept his word by having his name removed. Hillary left her name there as a failover stragety. I am sick of people being headline parrots. Wake up and read the story below the headlines.
Posted by: Larry Oregon | May 16, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Hello there Europe1. Don’t you have a European blog you can participate in, you know, one where the issues might change YOUR life. I don’t think you are entitled to an opinion about how we run our railroad! Regarding our current leader’s decision to go into Iraq, why don’t you share with us just which country you’re from, I’d venture that throughout history your leaders have done a couple of things you may, as a country have not all agreed with!
Posted by: Susy | May 16, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Bill Clinton is a FARCE. Be careful Monica is looking at you Billy boy, she remembered how you DISSED her….
Posted by: Kissoon Ramawad | May 16, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
false accusations of racism?
lol you people truly are stupid…and thoroughly dishonest.
So the little ladies are pissed off because hillary isn’t the nominee. Go ahead, vote for McCain.
As it stands right now, this election year will prove to be the end of the DNC. If you think somehow putting McCain in office is going to get you hillary in 2012, you are oh so sadly mistaken.
It will be crystal clear soon enough.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | May 16, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
If he steals the nomination from Hillary I will NEVER vote for barack hussien obama.
Posted by: andrea | May 16, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Popular vote as of May 16, 2008
These figures INCLUDE Florida and Michigan, as they were fairly and legitimately earned by Senator Hillary Clinton, and have been validated by the respective Secretary’s of State.
Obama 16,680,827
Clinton 16,710,298
Total Diff. +29,471 (Clinton)
Pct. Diff. +0.08% (Clinton)
So, why SHOULD Hillary quit NOW?
Who do you think will be leading after next Tuesday?
Hint – See below:
Combined population of Oregon, Montana and South Dakota = 5,173,438
Combined population of Kentucky and Puerto Rico = 8,086,459
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 16, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Which Democratic candidate is more electable?
Consider this:
This is how the Electoral College stands as of April 23, 2008, showing strengths of Clinton vs. Obama, based on their results. For those who have not understood, this is not a head-to-head matchup, but rather a side-by-side comparison.
This assumes a winner-take-all primary/caucus vote takes all Electoral votes for each state. The totals immediately below are WITHOUT any consideration of the states of Florida and Michigan.
Clinton 261
Obama 181
But with Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 305
Obama 181
Assuming the following victories, based on current polls, with Clinton winning Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Obama winning North Carolina, South Dakota, Oregon (which is doubtful), and Montana, the totals would then be, still without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 285
Obama 209
Even with a victory for Obama in Indiana, the totals would be, still without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 274
Obama 220
Please note that it takes 270 Electoral College votes to win the General Election.
Whether or not the vote turns out as indicated, I firmly believe the above analysis more than amply demonstrates which of the Democratic candidates is in a better position to be the stronger candidate in the General Election.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 16, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
The only rule that counts, if you believe in Jeffersonian democracy, is to count the votes by the principle of one person one vote.
Posted by: a new name | May 16, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Bill, it is wise to know when to speak and when not. It is also wise to know that when you have dug yourself into a hole, to stop digging. And, that you can’t have everything your way all the time.
Bill your time (and obvious influence) has come and gone and now it is time for you to do the same. Can’t he and Jim Carvel find a row boat somewhere in Arkansas where they can just float down the river and fish?
Hillary had every advantage possible for any candidate in history (with the exception of perhaps George Washington, but he was a winning general, war hero and actual leader) and yet she and her campaign surrogates are still complaining and whining about “how the system is not fair “only” to her.
Bill find some place to finally get some integrity, old man. The Clinton political bullying days are hours away from being over. Take it like you give. But then, that might depend upon what the definition of “it’ is. Bill acts like Obama is going to find his stash of porno he left in the Whitehouse or something. Let it go ther, Slick Willie, you had your turn, now go away. Go away and stay away. We’ll call you if we need you back, promise (but, don’t hold your breath)!
Posted by: SpaceTraveler | May 16, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Things are NOT as they are made to appear.
For all the talk about “Super Delegates”, there is nothing “Super” about them. Just as everyone of us, they have one vote each. Their endorsement is just that, an endorsement. It is not a vote. They are not supposed to come into play unless there is a deadlocked convention, and in that case, they are expected to exercise their BEST JUDGMENT to cast their votes for that candidate they, in view of their extensive experience and political wisdom, think would be able to WIN the General Election. They are not supposed to be endorsing this or that candidate, BEFORE THEY VOTE AT THE CONVENTION. To do otherwise is to be false to the trust and responsibility that has been placed in and on them.
It would be better at this point if all the bickering supporters of each candidate looked at the number of ACTUAL PLEDGED DELEGATES allocated to their candidate on the basis of primaries and caucuses won. Those figures, as of May 16, 2008 (NY Times web site), for those who truly follow politics are:
Obama 1418
Clinton 1352
Diff. 66
Of the “surveyed” “Super Delegates”, of which there are approx. 795, there are at least 238 who have not “endorsed” any candidate, which is as it was intended to be. Again, an “endorsement” does not necessarily translate into a convention vote, since in theory “Super Delegates” are supposed to represent the wisdom of the party and are expected to be above the fray. Those who have endorsed, really should be stripped of their position and replaced by those who will act as intended. However, that is the responsibility of the DNC, which so far, has proven inadequate to discipline its own members.
The bottom line, “Super Delegate” endorsements should not be counted by candidates claiming that such an “endorsement” makes this person into a PLEDGED DELEGATE, for that is NOT THE CASE, and to think otherwise is to delude oneself and one’s followers. It is also wrong for the media to even report what “Super Delegates” are doing now, as they do not even come into play unless and until there is a DEADLOCKED CONVENTION.
However, there is nothing to prevent partisans from ‘counting chickens before they hatch”, nor is there anything to prevent the media from playing games with gullible people to increase interest in these silly stories.
As Yogi Berra once said, “It ain’t over, ’til it’s over”. And this fight is a long way from over.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 16, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
I WANT TO FIX HILLARY CLINTON FOR STAYING WITH BILL WHEN SHE SHOULD HAVE DIVORCED HIM OVER:
1. HIS ANTIMASTURBATION
2. HIS CHEATING ADULTERY
ALSO IM AGAINST HER NOT LISTENING TO ME ABOUT VOTING AGAINST THE ANTI POKER BILL (PHONE CALLS, LETTERS) AND RECEIVING FUNDING FROM HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES WHEN THEY ARE ALREADY OVERCHARGING AND AGE DISCRIMINATING. I ALSO BELIEVE LIKE JOE LIEBERMAN THAT BILL CLINTON SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED AFTER ILLEGALLY CHEATING ON HIS WIFE.
Posted by: FRANK TELLLS | May 16, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
europe1 – hey don’t get excited. That’s how an invasion started! It was a joke. Have some humors….
Posted by: boneheaded | May 16, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
LA in Indiana, I’m sorry you are so afraid. I can “hear” it in your comments. You see we understand your need to “dis” some of us that don’t agree with you, and to try and elevate your own self-worth by using disparaging remarks about other bloggers and of course Senator Clinton. I know it must be hard to keep on listening to empty promises, and the deep down knowing that even if your candidate is successful in maintaining the frenzy and perpetuating his “messiah” persona….we’ll be in one sorry mess with “no experience” in the White House. Unlike you, those of us who didn’t get caught up in the frenzy will be there to support you when your saviour falls from Grace.
Posted by: Susy | May 16, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
One last thought about my Electoral College Vote analysis; in it I gave Senator Obama full credit for the state caucuses he won. However, it should be noted that there are not any caucuses to be won in the Big Leagues during the General Election. There are only PRIMARIES, WINNER-TAKE-ALL.
And I am sure the “Super Delegates” are aware of that.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 16, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
chris -
You have given too much credit to BHO as a demonstration of lacking experience when he withdrew his name from the ballot.
In fact, it was a carefully planned political calculation.
He was pandering voters in Iowa, to show his solidarity with iowans to keep their undemocratic caucuses first in the primaries.
His calculation was successful, unfortunately, and those Iowans do Owe the World an Apology.
Posted by: Boneheaded, Chicago | May 16, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
You know Billy as well as I do she voted not to count the vote if they voted ahead of New Hampshire.They all did,,NOW she want the popular vote to throw in the faces of supers she wants to change the rules mid stream.She can’t have it both ways time to tell the spoiled bi— she can go home she has a hissy fit if she don’t get her own way and from what I am hearing if you don’t get her elected there is a divorce in your family ohhhh poor baby >>>>>You are a piece of crap and when you leave this you will amount to nothing in many of the books
Yavo Lam nice math I hope you don’t have a job in accounting
Posted by: IND older person | May 16, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Bill Clinton is not campaigning for his wife Hilary, he is campaigning for himself.By pushing his wife to keep campaigning, he is actually destroying her political life. The type of campaign they conducted this season against their fellow Democrat will come back to haunt them tomorrow. Mark my words.
Posted by: Dr. Jesse Kally-Williams | May 16, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
All of the candidates agreed to not campaign in either state. Obama could have at least gotten a larger amount of the votes/delegates had they all decided to at least campaign in the states.
So the question is this…
If following the rules has hurt Obama on terms of votes in those states, and wanting the delegates to be seated fairly has been used against him by his opponents to tarnish him and his general election chances, how does this debacle benefit him?
Clearly moving the primary dates was meant to benefit somebody in some way and it blew up in their face, now Baracks candidacy, and the Democratic party is jeopardized by it.
Posted by: Observer | May 16, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Can’t change the rules. Revote? Maybe. But the Democratic party primaries would crumble next election.’ No really we mean it this time. The last time we gave in, but this time we mean it.’ Sounds like a bad parent at the supermarket. Follow the rules. Notice which side is wanting to bend the rules. Does this tell us about this candidate? And save the ‘every vote must count rhetoric’ for your kids. The adults know that game by now.
Posted by: cmg | May 16, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Talk Talk Talk like it is.
The party stinks.
BO fanatics start the negativity and double standards and get away with it. Racism starts both ways and they screw the voters.
The more the BO fanatics come in with their venom, the more determined we are to give them hell.
MAMA; Nobama
Posted by: John_Lai | May 16, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Susy, unfortunately your president affects my life deeper than you think. Actually, it affects the entire world. Here in my country we always backed your country, we sent troops to help the US and my brother is now in a wheel chair because of the Iraq war. Now imagine to find that all was just a bunch of lies.
Please democrats come together, unite the party for your own good and ours as well.
Posted by: europe1 | May 16, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Observer,
Good observation. The Republican strategy worked perfectly. That’s exactly what the republicans hoped and did by imposing the early primary date to the Democrats in Florida.
Now, the DNC punishes the Democrats, because the Floridan republicans wanted them to do so.
Posted by: a new name | May 16, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I have read most of your comments except the ones that tend to ramble on or approach this issue in anger. First off I will not vote for either Democrat candidate that is running this year and will vote Republican which I have done for many elections. Also let me say that I AM NOT happy nor proud of the current President and his agenda. Actually I do not see any of the candidates able to fix the crisis in this country but I will chose the lesser of evils at least I know what to expect from the Republicans and please do not try to change my views. In the past I have always had a clear choice but this time its a toss up. As far as the Mi. and Fl. votes are concerned if I were in Hillary’s position I would do the same thing and I am sure had Obama won those states he too would be doing exactly what the Clintons are doing. The fact of the matter is that the people of Florida and Michigan voted and their votes should count regardless of the DNC. These are Americans that fulfilled their commitment to make their voices heard and they should not be penalized because their party leaders.
This is not a candidate nor a party issue it is just simply this “If I vote I want it to be counted”!
Posted by: OF | May 16, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Yavo Lam nice math I hope you don’t have a job in accounting
IND older person
==========================================
Why the put-down, IND older person? Are you saying that my math, or my reasoning is suspect, or both? And if so, then in what manner? Kindly point out the error of my ways, or my methodology. Else, I will accept your apology.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 16, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
europe1 -
What makes you think Obama will not go to another war? What if he pushed a wrong button, but even when it was too late when he comes out to explain what he really meant to push was the one he did not push?
His war opposition was only because he gave an anti-war speech at a rally against the other party, without any responsibility, without any knowledge of intelligence (for whatever it worths and turned out to be wrong).
Posted by: Boneheaded, Chicago | May 16, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Current lead Democrats need counseling ss they may be guided through right path to democracy. And how can you ignore millions of voters?
Posted by: Rabin Deka | May 16, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Please someone tell me one thing Hillary has accomplished as a senator -just one thing! She is one of the most devisive people ever to be a senator. After trying to manipulate the primary process and denying the eventual nominee she will lose her senate seat in 2 years and hope I will never hear from thse two crooks again.
“I did not have sexual realtions with that woman.”
“I remember dodging bullets as we ran to the cars.”
Posted by: mark | May 16, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
“It’s over when the voter’s say so”.
It does not matter what the lady in the pantsuit says.
Posted by: REality | May 16, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
“you can,t lead by lying” Jimmy CARTER
Will you vote for a person who gave you beatiful Bosnia story.First YES then NO on war. First YES on Nafta the No on NAFTA. Did you have enough of BUSH and his lying ?
For haven sake vote for someone honest!
Posted by: Rachhpal S Kukreja | May 16, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
I’ts not over until all the votes are counted! Just like the lady in the pantsuit says so.
Posted by: JON | May 16, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Hillary DID campaign in Florida. She claims she just went there for a political, but it was reported on the news and she made campaign statements ON THE MONDAY BEFORE FLORIDA VOTED. She is completely unscropulous. I am tired of her shrill scolding of everyone.
GO AWAY Hillary!!!
Posted by: mark | May 16, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
mark – go take a hike. It might help you with your anger control.
Posted by: a new name | May 16, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Imagine, after the year 2000 election, a Democrat has to defend counting votes in Michigan and FLORIDA! Only Howard Dean’s continued arrogance can account for this twisted situation. Down with Dean. Vote against the Democratic Party in November. Hillary, run as an independent. You have my vote!
Posted by: Mandelay3 | May 16, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Whether you like to hear it or not, Bill has made a point. The voters in MI and FL did not make the decision to move the primary schedule, but millions of them who turned out to vote in the primaries anyways vote to get their voices heard. The superdels might not like to hear it, but they know DAMN WELL that Obama won’t be able to carry those two states EVEN IF he campaigned there. If the older voters had not liked Clinton, they would and could stayed home, instead of turning out en mass to vote for her, even though she did not campaign there.
To me, the Dem party decides to forego all its core voters, and let this campaign season to be hijacked by the elite wealthy, the blacks, and the college kids. It’s as simple as that. I’m just so plain disgusted by the Democratic party, Howard Dean, and Nancy Pelosi. To hell with them, I’m going to vote for McCain, come Nov.
Posted by: Laura L | May 16, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
a new name: don’t add fuel to the fire. DoN”T repeat what his last significant other told him in private.
Posted by: Brent | May 16, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Are you people from the left wing of the clinton party stupid?
This is a party, you have no rights at all when it comes to there vote and you never have (see Tom Pendergast, who incedently appointed our last truely great president, President Truman).
Even funnier are you “Jeffersonian Democracy people”, Jefferson the slave owner, Jefferson only men who own land can vote. When Jefferson said one MAN one vote he meant it “sweetie” you women are just to stupied (which is why we in the 20th century had to correct Jeffersons mistake)!
You people are sad you will vote for an extension of GWBs term just to make a point. That you are a cry baby and if I don’t do what you say you are going to run and cry and teach me a lesson, maybe you will hold your breath until you turn blue (just wishful thinking on my part). Go vote for John “100 years war” McCain and see where your life goes then. I will be laughing somewhere else while the brain drain that you are seeing because of GWB and JM continues. Enjoy your country because nobody else will.
Posted by: splitter | May 16, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Look. If you are mad at the Michigan/Florida issue, you should direct this at the DNC. Given that, then you can consider the arguments by many on what, if anything, to do about it. Looking at the arguments coming from the Clinton and Obama camps, clearly Clinton is being disingenouous here and it makes me ill.
I switched to supporting Obama primarily because of three issues. (1) “obliterating” Iran is simply a gross violation of human rights and is completely thoughtless – Clinton should never have said it, and should have taken this back – it indicates more thoughtless and damaging foreign policy (2) The gas tax holiday: In the face of virtually every significant economist criticising this policy as ineffective, Clinton dismissed their opinions as not relevant to the plight of consumers. Really now, haven’t we had enough of a president who routinely dismisses science and expertise as something that is irrelevant? And (3), her arguments for including Michigan and Florida are clearly only about her winning. If these things mattered so much, she would not have agreed to the DNC rules in the first place.
Get real Clintons!
Posted by: yo | May 16, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
The Clintons are working their heart out for the country. Threats about political future from the BO fanatics are ridiculous.
If there is no justice today, there is no future for the country. The Clintons don’t care about the threats. So people should behind the president to get the party on the right track.
We know that the party have screwed the voters and establish double standards to silent 2M voters. That is a sin. In order
to take the momentum away from Hillary, BO and his company stopped revotes and ignore their right of nomination by votes.
Does the following mean anything to BO fanatics:
For the people, of the people, and by the people.
BO is now putting the party before people. He has no backbone. He ducks challenges, slacks, goes to vacation amidst a campaign, blames on their staff for his mistakes. His standing is on the paper and he unloads his responsibility to staff. This is a wimp with no backbone.
BO promote poetic change with no substance. The Clintons change the country so that we are much better off with low crime rate, realistic welfare program, and gave the Democratic Party’s reputation for economic management.
Vote for All American Hillary; Nobama.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 16, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Just suck it Bill.. We are already fed up with you and ur greedy wife, so you guys can stay in all the luxury of the white house.. No one will ever believe you..
Obama is going to be USA President 2008..
Posted by: epa | May 16, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Yavo Lem–
If you think the superdelegates will overturn Obama’s pledged delegate lead at the convention, you are crazy. I will even go so far as to say Hillary Clinton won’t even try to take it to the convention.
Why? Because she is a LOYAL democrat, as she proved yesterday in her statement regarding Bush’s comments. She will rally behind Obama. This will be over June 4th, as it should be. There is no way she will put the party or her own political career at stake. Why her supporters cannot be as gracious as she is trying to be is beyond me.
Bill on the other hand is just an idiot.
NO CONVENTION FIGHT
========================================
“This will be over June 4th, as it should be.” And just why SHOULD this be over on June 4th?
ANSWER:
“If you think the superdelegates will overturn Obama’s pledged delegate lead at the convention, you are crazy.”
I do and I’m not crazy. Do you not know what the function of the “Super Delegate” is? If not, try reading Geraldine Ferraro’s NY Times article, “Got a Problem? Call the Super.”
“Bill on the other hand is just an idiot.” I assume you have proof of this allegation. If not, is it your habit to just go around libeling people? The term “idiot” is obsolete in science, and has been replaced by a broad definition of “Profound Mental Retardation”, so are you then saying that former President William Jefferson, who is a lawyer and former Rhodes Scholar, suffers from Profound Mental Retardation, as defined in the DSM-IV? I hope not.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 16, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Bill Clinton simply continues to LIE, just like his wife.
1. Senator Obama himself raised the issue of national ads before he ever ran them and got both clarification and permission from the DNC to run national ads.
2. Hillary’s mouthpiece, Howard Wolfson, voted to create and uphold the sanctions on Michigan and Florida.
3. Howard Dean has been encouraging both Florida and Michigan to hold a rules-permitted primary and/or caucus for months. Both state legislators flatly rejected that option. What Bill Clinton demands is what the DNC offered, Obama accepted, and both states (and the overly whiney complainers, led by Debbie Whiner Wasserman, flatly rejected).
If Bill has a problem with his cries for revotes, let him take it up with his wife’s national campaign whiner Debby.
Posted by: Earl | May 16, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Slight Correction: Make that Former President William Jefferson CLINTON, in my last post
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 16, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
You guys need to looks at the bigger picture.
Bill can do the math. Right now, he is making sure that the voters in Michigan and Florida hang with the Democrats.
When November comes, the hope is that voters will remember that Bill and Hillary were fighting for their voices to be heard.
That outreach, even by the candidate who is behind in the delegate count, may be enough to stem the tide of disgruntled voters from pulling the lever for McCain.
It’s a thankless job….and one they are doing willingly.
Posted by: sherr | May 16, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
We should line up behind the president who brought real changes to this country not the poetic change that BO promote which is just hot air.
Vote for Hillary.
Do you know how BO get his credential and how he does about it. Here is how:
Todd Spivak of the Houston Press has documented how Obama accomplished next to nothing in his first six years in the Illinois legislature.
Then Emil Jones Jr. an African American with thirty years in the legislature made Obama a sponsor of 26 bills that became law. This is how BO portrays himself as a highly successful legislator. This is just like giving him the ball at 1 yard line. Has Obama repaid Jones? Yes. He has provided tens of millions in earmarks for Jones’ district. As to such actions, Jones famously said: “Some call it pork; I call it steak.”
Michelle Obama’s salary at University of Chicago Hospitals when her husband won the US Senate seat was $121,000. Within weeks of his swearing in, her salary went to over $320,000. The following year Obama did an earmark request for $1 million for her employer.
BO is just a talker who used bombastic high-flown language to fool millions of people by poetic promises of change. In reality, he has taken considerable money and support from all sorts of corporate and other special interests. Remember his Bittergate in Frisco! Also, his fabricated credential in the net is just hot air; FACTCHECK says don’t believe it.
BO does not have what it takes, the stamina and tenacity to be a true, and solid reformer. Hillary clearly does.
Hillary 08; Nobama
Posted by: John_Lai | May 16, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Sounds like the Republicans are out in force on this blog. They certainly seem to be doing an efficient job of cutting the Democratic party in half. Survival of the fittest, I guess.
Posted by: Dave | May 16, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
After Rev Wright, Bittergate, 57 states, Afghanistan gaffe, Sweetie women act, BO is a big liability. No matter how much the black community stumps for him.
He is not qualified to the highest post of the country. He is just a screw ball.
Vote for the ALL American Hillary. To answer the 92% of black votes, we need to give 100% to tell them they are wrong to vote by race.
Line up behind the president who brings changes to this country. The president and Hillary are using their money to give us warning that could crush this country: a wimp to be president.
All American Hillary 08.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 16, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Count the votes! Forget about all the SUCKERS who STUPIDLY relied on everyoe following the agreed rules and stayed home! These people SHOULD be disenfranchised, precisely because of their GULLIBILITY in believing the rules would be followed.
Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | May 16, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Forgot the popular-vote argument of Obama. If FL and MI were counted, Clinton beat him hands-down.
Posted by: dennisp | May 16, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
You can’t count the votes in an invalid election. The states should have held a revote and allowed the candidates to campaign. They didn’t, case closed, game over.
Posted by: Gary | May 16, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Dennisp-
Wrong–she didn’t beat him “handsdown” in the popular vote. Actually I think it is about 5000 votes and that is giving him ZERO in MI. Hard to believe not one single person in MI wouldn’t have voted for him.
Also the caucus states have not been counted in the total. The popular vote argument is BOGUS.
Posted by: BOGUS | May 16, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
President Clinton has become a sad, sad caricature of himself.
He does realize that everyone can look up his statements instantaneously now, doesn’t he?
This self-destruction is a sad, sad sight to behold.
Posted by: Jeff C. | May 16, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Posted by Jim,
“While I have sympathy for the voters in Michigan and Florida, I feel their just anger is headed in the wrong direction.
Citizens in both states should not be angry at the DNC. The DNC created primary guidelines that everyone agreed to abide by, including the Democrat leaders in MI and FL. If the voters in these states lose their primary votes, its not the fault of the DNC, but instead the fault of the individual Democrat leaders in those two states who decided they could ‘break the rules.’ If I were a resident of either state, I would vote out any and all Democrat leaders who voted to move the primaries before February 5th.
Bill Clinton is trying to play this off as a fault of the entire democrat leadership, when quite actually, the leadership of these two states is solely to blame.
The Clintons are now a danger to the Democratic party and are trying to place a wedge in it. Funny since Hillary also voted for the February primaries.
They broke the rules. They pay the price. Nobody can take away their votes in November, and that is the utmost importance.”
Excellent post. It is Spot on!
Posted by: Parkhillian | May 16, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
WHY I REFUSE TO VOTE FOR OBAMA!
Lack of Experience: Since when does, “I have a Dream trump I have a Resume?” He has no foreign policy experience (and we have two wars going on), no national political experience. He’s running on “changing Washington politics” and as a junior senator probably doesn’t even have a key to the men’s room.
Arrogance and Elitism: The great orator spouts phrases like “typical white people” or “bitter folks that cling to guns and religion.” Only an arrogant politician can insult you and then inspire you to “do better”. He refers to professional women as “sweetie” , an inexcusable mistake that only my 85 year old grandfather might be allowed to get away with.
Race baiting: We are expected not to notice that Obama might just be the first African American president. We must not mention the fact that 92% of the Black vote is going to Mr. Obama or make notice of who is NOT voting for him. If you draw those distinctions then we are all racist people trying to sabotage the chances of making history. It’s a double bind. I can’t stand the pressure.
He’s not tough enough: I’m sorry, but he whines. Phrases like “Silly Season” are too weak and annoying. He also got his butt handed to him in over 20 debates. I was waiting for Hillary to pass him a tissue to wipe the tears away. “How dare she be so mean” “She’s running a negative campaign.” She didn’t run a negative campaign, he’s just weak. The issues of Wright, working class voters, his divide with women are all legitimate. These are his problems to own, not manufactured by the “Clinton Machine”.
Reverend Wright: It doesn’t meet the SMELL test. Obama can’t be talking about “uniting folks” and sitting in a segregated church for 20 years. It’s that simple for me. He seemed almost annoyed that anyone would question him. That grandiosity frightens me. We have lived through the personality disorders of Bush and Cheney for the last 8 years. I don’t think I can take it again.
“Short cut” to The White House: Clinton is smarter, tougher and obviously better prepared for the job of president yet Obama passes through with a smile and a speech. The mainstream media has hijacked our democratic process by declaring Obama the winner and pushing him to the finish line before all of the votes have been counted or Michigan and Florida has been resolved.
Bottom Line: No Clinton/No Vote for Obama!
Posted by: tracy | May 16, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Bill Clinton is auditioning for Jon Stewart’s next Douche-Off.
Posted by: Azdak | May 16, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
WOW! I thought Taylor Marsh has the most Hillary buzzards circling her site. But this one has the most by far! Let’s revisit history shall we Hillary sock puppets since you folks love to try to change it.
Ask yourself why Michigan and Florida tried to jump the line set down and agreed upon in early 2007 by the DNC. Why? Why did Hillary lackey Gov. Granholm from Michigan push so hard? It was because the prevailing thought was if they front-loaded the primary schedule Hillary would win an overwhelming amount of pledged delegates and force everyone out right after Super Tuesday.
But thanks to Howard Dean firm grasp of the rules, he gave both states ample time to get back in line, laid out the consequences to them and instead received a big ol’ middle finger from them.
Florida was a slightly different in that the Florida Dems got pwned by the Repugnantcans who forced them to stay out of line and suffer the consequences. Way to go Florida Dems…may all of you Dems legislators get voted out and replaced with some real Dems.
Anyway, Hillary’s grand plan was dashed when Dean stuck to the rules. Hillary, trying to save face, was then forced to acknowledge that Michigan and Florida would not count. She said as much to the voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, who actually have it written into their state constitutions that they must be first and second, respectively. Was she just pandering to them? Perhaps. But she said it.
Once Obama shocked her on Super Tuesday and exposed her campaign as having no Plan B, and once Obama ran away with the nomination with 11 consecutive victories, Clinton suddenly became the tireless defender of Michigan and Florida voters. “She’s such a fighter!” Puh-leeze.
If Obama was in the same predicament I’d probably be clinging to this flimsy theme as well. But I’d be intellectually honest with myself too that the rules are rules. And I know for certain too that I wouldn’t be calling for Obama to run as an independent and I wouldn’t be voting for McCain out of spite.
So stop with the threats sock puppets and know this – Obama’s supporters have been very busy registering people to vote for the Democrat in November. It will hurt our efforts if you actually carry out your traiterous threats. But I’ve personally registered more than 50 new Democrats for the November general election, so I’ve personally canceled out 50 votes of any 50 sock puppets appearing on this blog comment section. That goes for you John Lai – cancelled! Chris – cancelled! Griffin1944 – cancelled! Barby – cancelled! Stacey – cancelled!
Posted by: MarkieBee | May 16, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
If it is Obama who won Michigan and
Florida, and he is lagging behind,
you can be sure he will be pushing
hard for those votes to be counted.
So don’t be hypocrites – Obama
isn’t above dirty politics himself.
He would not have gotten his seat in
the Illinois Senate and US senate
had he not played fast and loose.
Between now and November, evidence
will be presented to implicate
Obama as a significant player in
the Rezko/Auchi/Levine corruption
scandal undergoing investigation.
Posted by: alee25 | May 16, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Dean, Kerry, Kennedy, Reid, Pelosi and all the DNC gang and Democratic Leadership in Congress were against the Clintons, they were over jealous of the comeback kid and the statesmanship and respect he gained around the globe and in the US. So they trashed Hillary and now trying to taint Bill Clintons legacy just to get rid of them and fulfill their own individual ambitions, they know he will overshadow them, so they found the puppet not only to attack him but to destroy him. They forgot that many have tried before and they never succeeded.
I am a longtime Democrat and Bill Clinton will be forever the one of the best Presidents this country has had.
Shame of the DNC, Congressional Leaders and Obama campaign! They betray even their grandmothers in order to achieve their purposes!
Posted by: Mark_ DC | May 16, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
I agree with Bill – count all the votes. I don’t care why they were disenfranchised, they just need to count. Why are all the democrats running to protect Obama? What is going on here? It is getting creepy.
I too will be leaving the democratic party after they force Hillary out. Obama has, among other things, been so disrespectful of the only good democratic president the U.S. has had in what 30 years or more. And his supporters are unbelievably rude and crude about the Clintons.
Posted by: Susan | May 16, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Tracy, let’s deconstruct your arguments one by one. It will be easy:
1. What foreign policy experience does Hillary have? If she had any, she wouldn’t have felt the need to lie about Bosnia, Macedonia and Northern Ireland. LIES!
2. Are you forgetting that Hillary is the junior senator from New York? So I guess both she and Obama have to raise their hands and wait for Harry Reid to give them a hall pass to use the restroom?
3. Sweetie? Really? Sweetie has your panties in a bunch? He already apologized to the reporter and she accepted his apology.
4. Ah, Obama more than handled his own in plenty of debates and won his fair share. Granted, the ambush by George and Chuck rocked him, but I think he recovered well enough to dish some out too. We never did get to hear Hillary explain why dear old Bill pardoned two former members of the Weathermen…do you have an explanation for that one.
5. You assume to much about Rev. Wright. From a 30-second sound byte played over and over again dfor six weeks you extrapolate and assume that Rev. Wright speaks that way and with those themes every Sunday and has for 40 years. Ask yourself this…why hasn’t any other tapes surfaced from the 1980s or 1990s with Rev. Wright spewing the same crap? Don’t you think Hannity would resell his soul for another tape? Could it be there are no more objectionable tapes? Hmmm.
6. “Clinton is smarter, tougher and obviously better prepared for the job of president.” Your opinion. Nothing more. Obama passed the bar on his first attempt. Hillary failed her first go around. Tougher? Based on what criteria? Better prepared? You gotta win the nomination first. She wasn’t better prepared for that little nagging detail.
7. No Clinton/No vote for Obama. That’s OK. Good riddance to ya. We’ll just have to cancel each other’s votes out. But I got hundreds of thousands of newly minted Democrats to replace you with and they actually donate money and volunteer their time. You see, it’s called a grassroots effort and books and doctoral theses will be written about and university classes will be taught on Obama’s grassroots organization. That’s another area where Clinton was woefully unprepared. Heck, her leading “strategist” Mark Penn thought California was winner take all and not proportionately allocated. Great hire Hillary…you’ll live with that one for the rest of your life.
Posted by: MarkieBee | May 16, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
MarkieBee,– you definitely talking or writing like a brainwashed person. I graduated in Law at the University of Chicago were Obama was a guest lecture professor. I like the majority of the student never ever saw him as the “brilliant” leader the media or the cult followers are seeing him now. There is not a single Law document written by Obama that is worth to even study. He knows how to write “Audacity of Hope” tho.
Grassroots from Obama only, dream on. You forgot that politicians endorse and share listings, if Obama loses his listing goes somewhere else for the most part. LOL
For you to say he doesn’t need the Clintons? is like to say he would be where he is now just by his own merits or achievements! nonsense! He is where he is know because of Major Daley, Kerry, Blogojevich, Daschle, Soros and the same Democrat machine!
In other words Markie, wake up or get a life!
Posted by: Nancy_Chgo | May 16, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
It doesn’t matter anymore, jsut count the votes so Bill can retire…..He is on his way to approval ratings like Bush, I have lost all respect for him and I voted for him twiceo
Posted by: tr | May 16, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
The votes from MI and FL should be counted in some fashion. However, these states did break the rules, and if the states are not punished in some way, the primaries could become complete chaos now and in the future. As far as questioning Obama’s motives, Hillary and Bill’s concerns are also quite suspect. Hillary’s campaign did not care a wit about MI and FL until they fell behind and needed something (anything) to catch up to Obama. Admit it, both campaigns are playing politics with these states, and the DNC needs to remedy the situation with MI and FL that is fair to both candidates and fair to both states.
Posted by: Indycvs | May 16, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
My real point was that Hillary will very likely NOT take it to the convention. Why? Because historically it doesn’t usually work and usually ends up costing the party the election. I think she will be a little more protective of her political future than that. I could be wrong, I admit it. How about you? Or is psychic part of your resume?
NO CONVENTION FIGHT
========================================
I’ll let the cheap shot pass.
No, but I am aware of the adage, “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” This is her last and only chance and I do not believe she will be denied, especially by someone as unqualified as Senator Obama. I have to laugh, though, as the same adage applies in equal force to Michelle Obama. I believe that if he loses, someone will pay.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 16, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
tracy – Inexperience of Obama as opposed to Clinton’s experience are legitimate issues to question Obama, but the other issues you listed is total BS. Especially since Hillary and Bill are guilty of all the things you accuse Obama of (arrogance, race baiting, whining (oh I am a woman and all the people claiming I should get out of the race are being sexist because they don’t want a woman in the race – if that’s not whining, what is?))
Posted by: Indycvs | May 16, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
The truth is, Barack Hussein Obama is not electable, and he not yet nominated. Hillary is vining votes,and Hillary will be nominated .
Hillary will be the president of the USA.
Posted by: Moe | May 16, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
I used to believe in the Democratic Party for their standing for fairness, justice, and equality. But I was very disappointed and disillusioned throughout this primary season. I’m sick and tired of the hypocrisy and bullying behavior the DNC, OB and his supporters demonstrated toward Hillary.
I’m not going to support DNC anymore and will never vote for OB – he’s cheated and bullied Hillary in this race.
Posted by: zhengli | May 16, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
So what are you saying Nancy? That Hillary got to where she is by her own hard work? Bill didn’t matter to her career as a politician at all? That the same Democratic machinery didn’t have a hand in her rise to political fame? Your post is confusing. Nowhere did I say Obama doesn’t need the Clintons. It would be great if her supporters could get over the defeat in the primaries and help Obama defeat McCain. For any Democrat, true Democrat – to be threatening to vote for McCain is just ridiculous. But we’re also not going to beg for their support and will move on without them if they want to continue threatening us and the party. That’s what I mean about our grassroots effort to register more voters. We have organized on a precinct level… the first presidential campaign to do so in at least 50 years. That will pay dividends in November, as it has since January.
So you weren’t impressed with Obama as a lecturer, so be it. It wasn’t his only job you know. But there are apparently plenty of your fellow alums who thought he was a wonderful instructor. This is evidenced, counselor, by Exhibit A, this section of a 2007 article from the Chicago Sun-Times: “Erika Walsh, an ’02 grad practicing family law in Chicago, called him “an extraordinary scholar on the law.”
“I can’t imagine there is somebody out there smarter than he is,” she said. “Many of our professors are so brilliant they are eccentric. But Barack Obama has an ability to reach across differences and communicate with people effectively.”
Added (Andrew Janis, an ’05 grad practicing labor law at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett in New York) Janis, “Some professors are just kind of going through the motions with you. He actually seemed to take everyone’s point of view seriously. If he could bring that to bear in the international level with foreign dignitaries and heads of state, I think that would put us in good standing with the rest of the world.”
Posted by: MarkieBee | May 16, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
This is a very fair assessment of this situation. Of course, there are probably a lot of Republican trolls here who will completely ignore this point and continue spouting their talking points.
I pledge to support whoever is selected as the Democratic nominee.
—————————
The votes from MI and FL should be counted in some fashion. However, these states did break the rules, and if the states are not punished in some way, the primaries could become complete chaos now and in the future. As far as questioning Obama’s motives, Hillary and Bill’s concerns are also quite suspect. Hillary’s campaign did not care a wit about MI and FL until they fell behind and needed something (anything) to catch up to Obama. Admit it, both campaigns are playing politics with these states, and the DNC needs to remedy the situation with MI and FL that is fair to both candidates and fair to both states.
Posted by: Democrats Unite | May 16, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
He who does not remember history will be punished by history.
Bill Clinton has brought the country with an un-precedented period of peace and prosperity. Whether or not you support the phony hypocrite BHO, show some respect to the only 2-term Dem president since FDR.
Posted by: a new name | May 16, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Obama is a loose cannon! Hillary has the Power of the People! When everyone has voted it will be obvious that the only candidate capable of winning a GE is Hillary
Posted by: Di | May 16, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
If Hillary was the one to have broken the rules in any way, like advertising in Florida, the MSM and pundits would have been all over it.
Funny, I didn’t hear Obama did break the rules in Florida quite clearly until now. And I read newspapers, watch TV and on occasion check out the blogs. I wonder why?
Posted by: Nitoy Lopez | May 16, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Boneheaded: (apt handle BTW)
Why would you possibly imagine that you have a better handle on Florida politics than a Florida native who has been politically active–on both sides of the aisle–for years?
With record foreclosures, property devaluation, skyrocketing taxes and the constant threat of devastating hurricanes, you can bet your ass Floridians went to the polls to address a tax referendum. Pull your head out of your undoubtably voluminous pizza and beer-filled derriere, face the facts and admit that the red hots have taken their toll.
Sorry for the big words. Elitist, you know.
Posted by: whataplace | May 16, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Go HIllary!!!
You are only hope for America!!!!
Obama will never,never,never get my vote!!!!
Obama is so scary!!!
I don’t trust him anything!!!!
Posted by: Maca | May 16, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
The problem for Florida, from what I’ve gathered from multiple news outlets, involved the state’s republican controlled legislature, and the machinated agenda that resulted in the disenfranchisement of millions of Florida voters.
Later, when a re-vote in both Michigan and Florida was approved by their respective state leaders and paid for without using tax dollars, Senator Obama declined. Like millions of other Americans, I believe his refusal to provide these important states a voice in the nomination of our Democratic presidential candidate, initiated the fracture of our Democratic party.
Senator Obama’s repudiation of the aforementioned revote afforded his campaign an unfair advantage, with delegates from only 48 states counted and seated at the convention. Since senator Obama refused a revote, delegates from both states need to be seated proportionate to the primary electoral votes.
Virtually all of my Florida-residing friends and relatives have indicated that because they feel betrayed by the Democratic Party (they believe the DNC didn’t champion their cause), they will not cast their votes for the Democrat in November. The consequence for this primary process debacle is the probable loss of millions of liberal, moderate, and conservative democrats, who will vote in force for McCain if their voices continue to be silenced.
For many lifelong Democrats, our loyalty to democratic ideology is deeply held. However, unless each and every vote is counted, and delegates from both Florida and Michigan are seated fairly, many of us will have to seriously consider whether or not the Democratic Party is loyal to us.
Posted by: Emily | May 16, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
So Bill and Hillary(I still can’t figure
out who’s running) are defending
Michigan and Florida after they agreed
to discount their votes before the
primaries began!
That’s like Kerry voting for the
Iraq appropriations bill for our troops
before he voted against it! LOL!
You Dems are a Laugh Riot!
Posted by: reaganfan | May 16, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
How rude and divisive for John Edwards to endorse Sen. Obama on the day after West Virginia primary? Then in the same breath talk about “party unity.” This is very typical of Obama campaign. Take about some high ideals for America and then take a real “low road!” This the “new politics” that he’s promising us? But I have to tell you if our now “presumptive nominee” Sen. Barack Obama is going to be the “real” Democratic nominee, sadly, another “George McGovern” fate tragically awaits the Democratic Party. It’s heartbreaking to watch the DNC self-destruct and its super-delegates squandering the distinct advantage it has to re-gain the White House in 08. But don’t be surprised; knowing the fact that DNC which houses the longest list of losers of any organization in America! The impending Democratic presidential loss to John McCain has to be blame on the same old politicians who have never won president elections calling the shots for DNC: Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Tom Daschle, Bill Bradley, John Edwards, Bill Richardson, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi and as you know many of them ran for president and lost! They are all supporting Sen. Obama. They are playing the same old loser’s game. That game is called the “idealism” game. These democrats have a penchant for being indulged in idealism, just like Barack Obama. As you know idealists like George McGovern never made it Washington. And of them are examples of such idealist losers. All this has happened before. They all said they are going throw the bums out and clean up Washington. But they all lost to the Republicans. And when you look at what happened at the Democratic primaries in Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and in many other states, and especially when you look at the 41 point victory of Sen. Hillary Clinton over the “presumptive nominee” in West Virginia, isn’t it obvious Sen. Obama can’t win; he doesn’t have the support of women, so called “Reagan Democrats” or working class white voters, rural voters, labor union households, Latinos, you know in spite of the media spin and promotion Sen. Obama is no more better than another George McGovern or Mike Dukakis! We all know that Black American and city liberals never won presidential elections for democrats. Sen. Obama had successfully maneuvered himself to be the front runner, with a help of zealots in caucuses states to get most of his delegate numbers. No matter how many congressional seats they win in the fall 2008 election if the Democrats fail to win the White House, the situation that we have right now─ with President Bush vetoing everything is not going to change. The unfortunate thing for the Democratic Party in this election cycle is that they have a presidential candidate who really can’t win. Remember, just before the general election in 2004, Massachusetts judge sanctified gay-marriage, which galvanized the conservation vote resulting in John Kerry’s defeat and George Bush narrow win. Just the same way now that California Supreme Court decision allow gay-marriage would surly bring lost of social-conservatives to 2008 polls and ensure the defeat of Barack Obama, just as it happened before. The Democratic party it known for its capacity for “Snatching the defeat out of the jaws of victory.” Sen. Obama can’t even change the defeatist dynamic of his own party and how can he propose to save America from its continuing decline?
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 16, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Ok they said I should say something pertinent so here goes, what does a vote matter, nothing bigger than a bag of candy corns if candidates are not allowed to campaign. The so-called elections in Fla and Mich are a sham and were from the day they disregarded the dates set forth by the dnc.
They were of NO RELEVANCE until billy and fhilly started to lose,then they were so very important. More hypocrite material from a losing side, used for a convenient purpose.
these states disenfranchised 48 states when they did what they did. now they should pay the price or else in 2012, our state and every other will cause chaos. Deal with that.
Posted by: JOHN YUNG | May 17, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Emily,
Obama is in favor of a fair seating of the Florida and Michigan delegates and was in favor of a fair revote. The only problem was that the Clintons and the State Party honchos were proposing a revote that disenfranchised many of the voters who would be inclined to vote for Obama.
With an agreement that the nomination won’t be unfairly taken from him, he will even acquiesce to an unfair division of the Florida and Michigan delegates to see them seated.
All,
I am disappointed at the tone and personal nature of many of the comments. I really hope that Obama and McCain do return to some old fashion campaigning to allow everyone to decide between them on their merits. However, I am not sure that an independent campaign by Hillary will have the result that some of these commenters seem to expect. Many of her comments, such as “obliterate Iran,” make me thing she is more Republican / Bush than Democrat. Besides, she will have trouble raising money for such a campaign.
Posted by: Decline-to-state | May 17, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
So many idiots so little time.
For all those WATBs bawling about their votes not being counted, blame your fugging state parties for voilating the DNC rules. Take the pastor crap and experience crap and shove it where the sun don’t shine. Hillary’s only where she is because of her husband. There are about 100 more qualified woman politicians in the Democratic party who are more experienced and better leader than her. Good riddance to the Clintons and their BS triangulating.
Posted by: horatius | May 17, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
I simply cannot believe that many of the people posting here who claim to be Hillary Clinton’s supports actually are who they claim to be.
I believe with all my heart that Mrs. Clinton’s real supporters are far smarter (and way more civil) than these diatribes here appear. These are clearly Republican shills. (And they seem desperate to inject more conflict.)
No clear-thinking Democrat would vote for 100 years in Iraq, would they?
Posted by: Carmen Cameron | May 17, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am
Bill Clinton is trying to turn voters AWAY from the Democratic Party!
Wake up, America…this is an evil man…
Posted by: Mary | May 17, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am
Barack Obama is acting just like George Bush did against Al Gore in 2000.
There is only ONE reason Obama doesn’t want the votes counted, and that’s because he loses.
Think about it:
Barack Obama refuses to hear the voices of the people in MI and FL, simply because the people didn’t vote for HIM.
Just what we need… Another Presidential candidate who doesn’t care to hear the voices of the people when the people vote for someone else.
Please, we need the voice of experience for President in these times, just like we needed Al Gore for President in 2000.
COUNT THE VOTES.
Posted by: Jan | May 17, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
i cant believe people on this board say we are stupid for voting for hillary no what has this world come to voting for a black man he aint for the american people he is for his black race wake up people his wife looks like she has alot of anger but she is proably waiting to get in to the white house to show her true colors the white house yeah right not no more
Posted by: melissa | May 17, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Floridians like to point out that it was the Republicans that pushed their primary date up, but that is only half-true. The Democratic leaders in Florida were on board with it as well. The interviews with the Dems in Florida confirmed that.
Neither Florida nor Michigan should be considered for the primaries unless it is a 50/50 split so as not determine who the Democratic nominee is. The rest of the country played by the rules. Florida and Michigan will have another chance in November at the General Election.
We cannot continue to reward bad behavior and Clinton cannot be allowed to cheat her way back to the White House. Rigged elections are a Republican thing — something that should never be an option for the Democratic party. Don’t turn the Democratic party into the Republican party just because Clinton has sold out.
Please write to the DNC every chance you get to let them know what you think about changing the rules in the middle of the race.
Obama 08!
Posted by: Fair | May 17, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Obama may, somehow, become the US President.
However, in actuality, Hillary Clinton is clearly the absolute top choice of all states in the United States of America, including the blue states, the red states, and all those that still want to divide the country.
Reverse-racism is still racism. Believe in yourself!
Posted by: OkyHo | May 17, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Bill is working hard for that third, illegal, term. He should have stayed as a retired statesman, and retained some dignity.
Posted by: Javalation | May 17, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
I have a problem with “uninformed” people who just rattle any kind of B.S.!It’s odd that the majority of voters in MI and FL say that they don’t feel “disenfranchised”. That’s a position that HRC started for them (which I think is quite insulting – like they can’t think for themselves). So many want to complain about wrongdoing; however, wrongdoing seems to be ok as long as it benefits their position. Real adults need to stop and prepare yourselves for what’s yet to come.
Posted by: VJmem | May 17, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
All votes should be counted; this is a country BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE, ONE NATION UNDER GOD.
SENIOR AGE 64
Posted by: CAROL | May 17, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Be careful…..
Don’t replace one BOzo with another
BOZO!
and watch your back; the teflon man whose candidacy was based on hype based on two semi-autographical novels and the king-pinning of Chicago’s Emil Jones
is really really busy buying up the democratic delegates…… which, in essence, means he is
BUYING THIS ELECTION!
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO DEMOCRACY???
GIVE ‘EM HELL HILLARY!
Posted by: questioner | May 17, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
to the obamaniacs:
The only things anyone knows about Obama is the self hype of his two semi-autographical NOVELS!
Since then, we’ve found him to be two-faced, (Jeremiah, two speeches, one thumbs up, one thumbs down).
Sexist,(“typical white woman,”sweetie”)
Short on facts: (57 states, the Great lakes in Oregon?).
His universal healthcare is at least 15,000,000 shy,
He is unable to speak in public without benefit of a teleprompter,
And he is prone to use the race card.
When I see Obama, I see a man who looks like the “what-me worry?” character in Mad Magazine…. only he’s green!
Be careful who you’re voting for!
We already HAVE a Bozo in the white house!
As for me, I’ll stick with someone who can bring workable solutions to this sad state of affairs.
Hillary Clinton!!!!!
Why would you vote for such an inexperienced braggart at a time when our economy is tanking,
to the obamaniacs:
The only things anyone knows about Obama is the self hype of his two semi-autographical NOVELS!
Since then, we’ve found him to be two-faced, (Jeremiah, two speeches, one thumbs up, one thumbs down).
Sexist,(“typical white woman,”sweetie”)
Short on facts: (57 states, the Great lakes in Oregon?).
His universal healthcare is at least 15,000,000 shy,
He is unable to speak in public without benefit of a teleprompter,
And he is prone to use the race card.
When I see Obama, I see a man who looks like the “what-me worry?” character in Mad Magazine…. only he’s green!
Be careful who you’re voting for!
We already HAVE a Bozo in the white house!
As for me, I’ll stick with someone who can bring workable solutions to this sad state of affairs.
Hillary Clinton!!!!!
Why would you vote for such an inexperienced braggart at a time when our economy is tanking,
Posted by: questioner | May 17, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
1. Hillary Clinton is the best Candidate.
2. The DNC is permitting/encouraging
the buying of votes for the nominee by
their precious BOZO.
3. The DNC is permitting the disenfranchisement of two of the several states which had the audacity to
break their dumb-assed rules.
4.The DNC’s rules and permission are
counter-constitution.
5. Thomas Payne said “These are the times which try men’s soul”, and they are.
6. G-d before Country before Party
7. MY HEARTFELT SUPPORT IS FOR HILLARY
>BECAUSE SHE CAN HELP OUR COUNTRY<
GIVE 'EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
no no to bozo
Posted by: questioner | May 17, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
It doesn’t matter what the RBC does now, they’ve already lost my vote. They lost it when Obama spoiled the revote and the DNC didn’t solve this before May 31, when Obama will be crowned. They will agree to seat just enough delegates to ensure Obama is the nominee and then seat them all in August when Obama makes a “magnamanous” request to include everyone. That’s too phoney to work. And no, I’m not a Republican in disguise. I’ve contributed thousands of dollars and volunteered thousands of hours for Democrats. This Michigan voter is going to the dark side in November. Actions have consequences. Obama and Dean be damned!
Posted by: Michigander | May 18, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
We need a radial overhaul in the democratic primary system. We should set a random timetable, so that not 2 tiny states dictate who should stay in the election, outlaw caucuses and count every vote once (not like in Texas. It is strange that while Hillary won in the primaries she lost in the caucuses). To count one caucus vote for couple of thousand real ones is anti-democratic.
To decide that states don’t count is ridiculous and counterproductive.
Posted by: AGS345 | May 18, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Counting the votes of unfair elections is called “rigging.” Corrupt elections are not what America is about.
If the leaders of the states of Florida and Michigan were that concerned about their Democratic primaries they would have held re-votes according to rules. Then they would have been free and fair elections, and could have been counted.
We cannot allow our elections to be corrupted by a small minority of whiners. If you really care, whine to your state leaders. They’re the only ones who can fix it.
Posted by: White Male Veteran | May 18, 2008, 5:42 am 5:42 am
So…the DEMS are really trapped between the devil and the deep blue sea … how are they going to enfold 2.5 millions this fall ? Hanging Chads all over again…
Posted by: csquan | May 18, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
on Bill Clinton …who can blame him ? …the AA turn their backs on him after they crown him as their first “black” american president…go Bill…if anything you owe to yourself.
Posted by: csquan | May 18, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Count votes in MICHIGAN, excuse me, are we talking about United States of America. If Hillary wants to be elected with “elections” having only her name on ballot, why is she not running for president in Cuba or North Korea instead? And then, why we have even to count any Obama votes ? Why not just say only Hillary votes are valid and so, Hillary won 100% of popular vote ? What is the difference with what she wants to do in Michigan ?
Posted by: Alex | May 18, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Florida and Michigan were not the only states that violated the delegate selction process timing rules
The law clearly states:
A. No meetings, caucuses, conventions or primaries which constitute the first determining stage in the presidential nomination process (the date of the primary in primary states, and the date of the first tier caucus in caucus states) may be held prior to the first Tuesday in February or after the second Tuesday in June in the calendar year of the national convention. Provided, however, that the Iowa precinct caucuses may be held no earlier than 22 days before the first Tuesday in February; that the Nevada first-tier caucuses may be held no earlier than 17 days before the first Tuesday in February; that the New Hampshire primary may be held no earlier than 14 days before the first Tuesday in February; and that the South Carolina primary may be held no earlier than 7 days before the first Tuesday in February. In no instance may a state which scheduled delegate selection procedures on or between the first Tuesday in February and the second Tuesday in June 1984 move out of compliance with the provisions of this rule.
You can check that here:
http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v001/democratic1.download.akamai.com/8082/pdfs/2008delegateselectionrules.pdf
That being the case Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina all violated this rule. Why are Florida and Michigan the only two states to be punished for it?
That being the case Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina all violated this rule. Why are Florida and Michigan the only two states to be punished for it?
Regardless, under the DNC rules, the Florida and Michigan primaries clearly count, and they are entitled to have 50% of their delegates seated at the convention as allocated by their state primaries. However, given that Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina were not penalized at all, the equitable options are to strip 50% of Iowa’s, New Hampshire’s and South Carolina’s delegates, or Florida and Michigan should not lose any, just as the other three states were not penalized. It’s not only fair and just, it’s simply following the rules.
All states should be treated equally when voting, one state should not get waivers others do not. Are they saying that some states are worth more than others? That’s what it sounds like to me.
Posted by: kristina | May 22, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
With Obama in the White House God Bless America will not be a phrase, but will become a prayer.
Posted by: informed democrat
Wow, for someone considering themselves a informed democrat, that has to be single handedly the most biased, moronic posting this week. Tell the truth, you’re just a republican troll worried about Hillary losing, because Obama going to empty a lot of republican seats if he wins.
Informed Democrats response to Irma
No I am an African American female, lifelong democrat who refuses to follow the race baiters within the black community who only follow Obama because “he is brown”,”its our time”, “when will we get our chance” and it goes on and on.
I support Senator Clinton because she IS the best candidate for all Americans, not just the marginalized African American community.
Learn to think before you write, remove emotionalism and THINK for God sake. Our nations future, economy and national security are at stake.
This is no time for liberal guilt.
Posted by: Informed Democrat | May 25, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Ran in front locomotive, which arrived late.
Posted by: Eldepryl | October 2, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm