Bill Clinton on Gas Taxes: He Raised ‘Em in ’93, then Opposed a “Vacation” in 2000
In 1993, newly-elected President Bill Clinton raised gas taxes 4.3 cents a gallon.
Bob Dole tried to get that repealed, to no avail, in 1996.
Said then-White House chief of staff Leon Panetta then: "In an election year, it is hard to separate speeches from serious proposals."
In 2000, Clinton was asked at a press conference "in light of the fact that OPEC has decided to increase production, do you see it as a mistake for the Senate to proceed with a bill that would suspend the gas tax? And if it reached your desk, would you veto it?"
His answer — no. he wasn’t sure the savings would be passed on to consumers. (And this is without a windfall profits tax on oil companies, as Sen. Clinton has proposed. Economists forecast that oil companies would pass on a new tax on oil companies to the consumer.)
"I don’t expect it to reach my desk because there seems to be bipartisan opposition to it in the House, including among the leadership," he said. "But the problem I have with it, apart from what it might do to the Highway Trust Fund and the spending obligations that have already been incurred by the acts of Congress, the budgets, is that I’m not sure that the savings would be passed along to the consumers in addition to that. So I think there are a lot of questions about it."
The record-setting gas prices right now of course make the situations in 1993, 2000, and 2008 different. But it is interesting to once again compare the record of the administration from which Sen. Clinton claims her experience with her proposals today.
If people are hurting from gas taxes now, after all…
– jpt
Email
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Romney Makes His Case to Conservatives at CPAC
Clinton Hypocracy rears its ugly head! What a surprise!
They’ll say anything to get the nomination!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | May 5, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Thanks for reporting this Jake.
It’s nice to know someone at ABC is willing to report the news.
Posted by: Dan | May 5, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Who cares what Bill Clinton did when he was president. Hillary is the one up for election. Hilliary is gonna win it all so the media can stop portraying her as the devils spawn. I have been disgusted by the media especially ABC News for all of the biased opionions. To me thats not journalism.
Posted by: kito11 | May 5, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
What was the price of gas then? What is the price of gas now? Right before the 2004 election gas prices were closer to $1 than $2 a gallon.
Posted by: geevil | May 5, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
@ kito11
@ Lookup
- – - – - – - – - – - – -
Maybe you failed to read the part that says, “it is interesting to once again compare the record of the administration from which Sen. Clinton claims her experience with her proposals today.”
Posted by: Deep Release | May 5, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
How convenient is it for Hillary to buddy up to Bill’s successes, but distance herself from his misses. She only claims her time in the WH as ‘experience’ when it is convenient for her.
What a joke.
Posted by: Deep Release | May 5, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Gasoline was quite reasonable before the Democrats took over both houses of congress.
Say no to Nancy, Dean, Teddy, Soros and the other left-wingers who continually block the economic supply side of the equation. Moderates, come home!
Posted by: A | May 5, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Jack
Obama voted 3 times in IL for repealing Gas tx. He is opposing it nw. Can you report that. Stop writing crap.
Posted by: Tony | May 5, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Let’s see…
As an Illinois state senator, Barack Obama supported an elimination of the fuel tax.
Now, as a U.S. Senator roaming the country in search of another job, Barack Obama has flip-flopped and does not support even a temporary elimination of the fuel tax.
Typical…
Posted by: Jayhawk | May 5, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
I am in favor of Hillary’s gas holiday tax break plan because it gets paid for by the oil money grubbers! Hillary always tells how she would pay for her proposals because she is an amazing fiscal manager; even better than Bill was :)
Posted by: Lynne | May 5, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
@ jayhawk & tony
- – - – - – - – - – -
He supported it until it was implemented and discoverd to be ineffective. Meaning he supported it until it was proven that IT DOESN’T WORK!!!
Posted by: Deep Release | May 5, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Who will really determine what happens to the Gas holiday?
Nancy Pelosi!
And she’s as liberal as Obama (aka Soetoro). That’s your clue!
Posted by: A | May 5, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Senator Obama is blasting the gas tax relief proposal. How asinine on Obama’s part. He is out of touch with ordinary people and their problems. Honest families do not have a Tony Rezko helping them out with tainted money. Senator Obama is a sleaze and is getting more so evey day. A vote for him is a vote for Marxism and corruption. And he will say or do anything to get elected.
Posted by: Iriah Gram | May 5, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Obama is opposing it, because he has no temporary solution. Economist are opposing, because their salaries are in 6 figures and they also have no temporary solution.
Posted by: Tony | May 5, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Tapper reports on what Bill did b/c Hillary is running off Bill Clinton administration…
This is exactly what the Obama camp is stating
Hillary takes pride in the positive outcomes of her husband administration BUT never the negative outcomes ex. NAFTA
If Hillary wants to use Bill Clinton years in office as her “commander and chief test” then she must accept the failures of the administration
Since she played such a “huge” role in the administration, I’m guessing she’s also to blame for the rise in gas prices
Posted by: Vanessa | May 5, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
First, Obama (aka Soetoro) as for the gas tax. Now, he’s against it. But you can bet your paycheck that he’d be for it now if Clinton hadn’t scooped him!
He’s just that kind of person!
You can look it up.
Posted by: A | May 5, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
What is Obama’s energy plan?
Posted by: Just Curious | May 5, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
if Obama thinks it did not work in IL, why did he vote 3 times. Only idiots will repeat the same mistake
Posted by: Tony | May 5, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Pound your chest and proclaim your love for the working poor all you want, but YOU can explain to them after this shakes out why, at best, some of them saved $30 over the whole summer, and at worst (and most likely) actually spent MORE on gas over the tax holiday.
YOU can then explain to them how their gas prices then skyrocketed even further, as the gas companies did the obvious thing and raised prices to recoup their windfall profits tax.
YOU can then explain to your children, and theirs, when they’re shipped off to the 20 year old conflict in the middle east under a draft why you thought potentially saving $30 bucks was worth electing a candidate who was so eager to go to war with yet another middle eastern country that she threatened them with obliteration, pre-emptively, before she’d even secured her parties nomination.
You can explain to them how her scandal ridden presidency rode out a 6 year lame duck status due to the legal wranglings and tabloid scandals generated by her unethical lethario of a First Husband.
Go ahead, vote for the gas tax, vote against your best interests economically, militarily, and morally. You can tell my kids someday why you personally destroyed their future.
Posted by: fontapa | May 5, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
In this nomination, there’s a Wright way and a wrong way.
You can look it up!
Posted by: A | May 5, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
geevil writes:
“What was the price of gas then? What is the price of gas now? Right before the 2004 election gas prices were closer to $1 than $2 a gallon.”
Those were way different times: there wasn’t a war going on which has wrecked the economy, the price of gas and groceries hadn’t just DOUBLED over a few months.
How many MILLIONs of Americans are trying to survive on casual labor or on SSI income of less than a thousand dollars a month?
The Democrats should have stuck with John Edwards, instead of moving heaven and earth to freeze him out in favor of the DLC birthday suits.
What’s the “news” apt to be this winter? Old folks freezing in tenements like Rezko’s, that’s what. And young folks, black AND white and brown, trying to make a revolution from scratch.
These stupid “Democrats” had better get themselves to Denver and nominate Edwards. And forget about Obama, the guy with no better sense than to go on the ice in dress shoes. Sheesh.
I’m surprised to find that I FERVENTLY hope this fraud loses North Carolina.
Posted by: Belle Starr | May 5, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
fontapa
I’ll take the $30. You can give your’s to the Nancy Pelosi re-election effort.
Posted by: A | May 5, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
DCV – has a good point. Someone needs to stand up for them common folks against the pointy headed elites, with their high foreheads, slide rulers and fancy kollege degrees.
We don’t need of them rascals, especially the so called experts. Experts are the worst of whole mess of them.
Everybody knows them gas taxes are WAY TOO HIGH. Hillary is right! Gastaxofascism is what it is. And its the Man that is sticking it to us and holding us down.
Keep on fighting!!! End Gastaxofascism NOW!
Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 5, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
On the Gas Tax Holiday
Neither Clinton nor McCain will be in office by the summer
Do you honestly believe George Bush will agree to tax the oil companies???
and lets say by some miracle he did…
Do you honestly believe the oil companies won’t raise the prices to make up for the deficit???
Both Hillary Clinton and John McCain know the Tax Gas Holiday plan will not follow through… that’s why everyone is calling it political pandering
Posted by: Vanessa | May 5, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
“Pound your chest and proclaim …”
Lay back and do nothing?
People are getting killed by the gas prices and you want to surrender to the oil companies?
Not on Hillary’s watch.
Posted by: len | May 5, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
STRANGE THAT YOU WOULD LOOK TO BILL CLINTON TO SHOW HILLARY IS A HYPOCRITE — BUT DON’T LOOK TO OBAMA TO SHOW THAT HE IS! WHAT A LAME STORY JAKE. PATENTLY UNFAIR. OBAMA SUPPORTED TAX HOLIDAYS THAT SAME TIME!
Obama took a different view on the issue when he was an Illinois legislator, voting at least three times in favor of temporarily lifting the state’s 5 percent sales tax on gasoline.
“The tax holiday was finally approved during a special session in June of 2000, when Illinois motorists were furious that gas prices had just topped $2 a gallon in Chicago.
“During one debate, he joked that he wanted signs on gas pumps in his district to say, ‘Senator Obama reduced your gasoline prices.
Posted by: tony | May 5, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Tony-
If you watched Obama on Meet the Press yesterday, you would see him admit that supporting the gas tax holiday in Illinois was a mistake. He fell for it, much like Clinton is now, and in the end the state lost funds for its highways, and the oil companies failed to pass the savings onto the consumers.
Obama has learned from his mistakes. The Gas Tax Holiday did not work in Illinois, and it would not work throughout the country. That’s not a negative – it’s a positive.
Keep trying though.
Posted by: JON | May 5, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
OBAMA GETS FREE PASS FROM JAKE!
CBS News says Obama voted for the temporary lifting of the tax three times in the State Senate.
“Obama took a different view on the issue when he was an Illinois legislator, voting at least three times in favor of temporarily lifting the state’s 5 percent sales tax on gasoline. The tax holiday was finally approved during a special session in June of 2000, when Illinois motorists were furious that gas prices had just topped $2 a gallon in Chicago.
During one debate, he joked that he wanted signs on gas pumps in his district to say, “Senator Obama reduced your gasoline prices.””
Posted by: tony | May 5, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
RE: GAS TAX HOLIDAY & Other DELUSIONS
“HILLARY’S DANGEROUS DELUSIONS,” inspired by a May 2, 2008 article in Huffing ton Post about “Hillary’s Psychic Reality”
Evaluate one or two of Hillary’s whoppers and ask yourself what it means about her if she really believes any of her stories are true or personas are real. For instance, does she really believe that she is an Annie Oakley, gun-toting working class white girl from the rural hinterlands? Does she really believe that her illusory gas tax holiday can be a reality even though it would require the Congress and President to pass it in about 2 weeks upon HER recommendation…or …that there can be a moratorium imposed on all foreclosures without causing bank failures and a millennium depression…does she really believe that she knows better than all economist and that the US will just brightly “Obliterate” Iran.
Aren’t these dangerous delusions just like Bush’s delusions about Iraq… is it the fact that they share delusional psychic realities the real reason she so readily believed Bush’s delusions about Iraq as she is also dangerously delusional. Recall her strange cackles or the weird “shame on you Barack Obama” NAFTA outburst that was only justifiable in Hillary’s reframed reality.
Isn’t it delusional to believe that she is the Democratic Party’s only hope in the Fall because the Republicans will give her the same free pass on her lack of honesty, character, integrity or honor and (apparently) sanity, which Obama has given her? Do you believe it? If so, I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn.
Posted by: shelgirl | May 5, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Obama made a mistake becoz he did not know how to fund it. Hillary has a plan to fund the tax break by taxing the oil companies.
Btw – During Bill Clinton’s time gas was cheap. So tax did not bother.
Hillary 08
Posted by: Tom | May 5, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
EIGHTEEN CENTS!!!
people are getting killed by EIGHTEEN CENTS????
It’s like five percent off the price of the cheapest most leaded gas on the market. At the higher prices, it’s much less than that!
Assuming they can get this Bill voted on by summer, which they cant…
Assuming they can get it passed by Congress, which they cant…
Assuming gas prices don’t simply rise almost instantly, which they will…
Assuming the gas companies won’t raise prices to recoup Hillary’s windfall profits tax, which they will…
You’re still talking about saving 5% or less over the summer on your gas!!!
What kind of elitist are you to beleive that EIGHTEEN CENTS is releif from anything??
You really think $30 over the summer is going to mean anything to anyone?
People are losing their houses, cars, and other property because they can’t make payments, they’re scraping by to buy groceries, they’re going uninsured and can’t find work, and you want to slip them a metaphorical check for $30 that’s only going to bounce!!!
Fraud, rampant and disgusting fraud!
Stick that in your tank and burn it!
Posted by: fontapa | May 5, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Sorry Jon – Obama only says this so he can go after Hillary and McCain. He said they were playing “Washington politics.” What was he playing in Illinois? How convenient to say I “learned” when it benefits you, but not when you had the chance to listen to wisdom.
PS: the news articles do not conclude that the tax relief did not work in Illinois, so he’s making that up too. In fact, while many economists doubt that a national gas tax relief could work, they do say it might have a helpful impact at the state level .
Posted by: tony | May 5, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Truckers and low income families are suffering severe economic distress. What Mr. Clinton did in the past has no bearing on today. History can judge how well he did his job. For now, tax relief could be implemented on short notice, and it might even help some poor families. Tax relief of any kind is usually good for the poor. Wealthy oil companies and the very rich will not be affected either way.
Posted by: texasdemocrat | May 5, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
On the Joe Morning Show, Obama admitted to once supporting a gas tax holiday but said he regrets it b/c instead of adding relief to consumers…
the oil companies profited
Posted by: Vanessa | May 5, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Yadda yadda…I guess that’s why he signed Cheney’s energy bill…Besides BILL CLINTON did this. Not Hillary Clinton. You guys are so moronic.
“SEN. OBAMA: Yeah, I learned from a mistake. And, in addition, what happens is, is that this would come out of the Federal Highway Fund that we use to rebuild our roads and our bridges. And if we don’t have that fund, then we’re looking at thousands of jobs being lost in Indiana and in North Carolina.”
Posted by: tony | May 5, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Bill Clinton does not = Hillary Clinton.
Obama = Obama
If you can link Bill Clinton to Hillary and call her a hypocrite, shouldnt you at least link Obama to himself and call him a hypocrite?
Posted by: tony | May 5, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Yes, Obama did support a gas tax holiday before. It didn’t work, so now he knows better.
That’s called EXPERIENCE.
Supporting it in spite of it’s destined failure is NAIVE on the part of Hillary.
But that narrative doesn’t jive with the media narrative, so they don’t choose to cover it like that.
Posted by: fontapa | May 5, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Obama may have signed a Cheney’s energy bill
but thanks to Hillary Clinton we’ve lost 4000+ American soldiers and 40,000+ injured
The facts are
Neither Clinton nor McCain will be in office by the summer
Do you honestly believe George Bush will agree to tax the oil companies???
and lets say by some miracle he did…
Do you honestly believe the oil companies won’t raise the prices to make up for the deficit???
Both Hillary Clinton and John McCain know the Tax Gas Holiday plan will not follow through… that’s why everyone is calling it political pandering
Posted by: Vanessa | May 5, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
You guys really think this man is Jesus. Maybe that’s why Rev. Wright went after him — he knows he’s a dirty liar. Yawn.
“On the Joe Morning Show, Obama admitted to once supporting a gas tax holiday but said he regrets it b/c instead of adding relief to consumers…the oil companies profited”
Posted by: tony | May 5, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Clinton supporters, you have to choose.
Either NOTHING counts from her experience as Bill’s wife, or ALL of it counts.
You can’t have it both ways, where anything bad he did or anything he did that contradicts her current positions doesn’t count, and anything he did that was good and is consistent with her does count.
It’s just foolish. She opened the door on claiming his administration as the source of her experience and argues that a vote for her is a vote to return to the prosperity of his administration.
It defies all logic or common sense to say “I’m endorsing everything my husband did as president, except the bad stuff, and anything he did back then isn’t my fault, unless you like it now, and then I was behind him all the way.”
Just rediculous.
Posted by: fontapa | May 5, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Since John McCain or Hillary will not be President this summer, how will they be able to Implement a Gas-Tax Holiday into FACT.. they can’t! It is a gimmick that they cannot produce on… That is so sad, and another example of Politicians trying to fool people for a vote on an idea or Gift they can’t deliver on or produce. It’s basically dishonest and a lie! Barack will not make a Phony Promise to the American people! We have been “sniper-fired” before!
Media is also disingenuous and complicit in this gas-tax holiday lie and myth! First because they know a President would have to sign off on this and, second because they fail to enquire of Hillary or John, just how they plan to sign this into Law when they in fact will not be President this summer! So,once again the Republican-controlled media fail the people by NOT pointing out the obvious! Failed us as they did with Iraq.
As for the obliteration of Iran remark, we should recall what Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill wrote in position 8 after World War II in The Atlantic Charter, both who knew and were familiar with the horrors of war….
Position “Eighth, they believe that all of the nations of the world, for realistic as well as spiritual reasons must come to the abandonment of the use of force. Since no future peace can be maintained if land, sea or air armaments continue to be employed by nations which threaten, or may threaten, aggression outside of their frontiers, they believe, pending the establishment of a wider and permanent system of general security, that the disarmament of such nations is essential. They will likewise aid and encourage all other practicable measures which will lighten for peace-loving peoples the crushing burden of armaments.”
Frankllin D. Roosevelt
Winston S. Churchill
Less we forget!
Posted by: Angellight | May 5, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Tom Hanks endorses Obama for President.
McCain has seen his best days.
Obama all the way?
Obama all the way?
Posted by: Lookup | May 5, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
TexasDemocrat -
Hillary’s bill will provide no definite tax relief to anyone but the oil companies, and will not help Truckers, whose Diesel-Fuel is already tax-free. However, it will cost thousands of jobs held by workers in states like Indiana, and will severely deplete our highway fund and will continue the decay of our infrastructure.
It’s not a solution, its a political gimmick. It will help no one but Hillary get elected. The funny thing is it’s not working. According to the latest CBS/NYT poll, 71% of Americans know that it’s just a political ploy.
Whoops.
Posted by: JON | May 5, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Rasmussen Reports
West Virginia
Clinton 56, Obama 27
Posted by: tony | May 5, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Tony-
I’m the one that posted that Obama admitted he made a mistake. That’s a GREAT thing. If we can’t learn from our mistakes, we can’t learn at all.
The real question is, if this has been proven to NOT work, why is Hillary still proposing it?
Oh yea, I forgot. Her own advisors already told us.
It polls well.
Posted by: JON | May 5, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
SurveyUSA
Indiana
n=675, MoSE=3.8
Clinton 54, Obama 42
Posted by: tony | May 5, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Is anyone surprised by this?
Posted by: indy_voter | May 5, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Current Delegate Count:
Obama 1750
Clinton 1611
Posted by: JON | May 5, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Tony -
How does our pointing out Hillary’s lies make us sound like we’re saying Obama is Jesus?
We’re not even saying anything special about Obama, we’re merely pointing out the obvious slimeball pander tactic that Hillary has played here.
She’s litterally writing a bounced check to the hardest pressed Americans. I hope she doesn’t get the nomination, because when the checks bounce, she’ll have a devil of a time getting their votes again come November.
Posted by: fontapa | May 5, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Current Popular Vote:
Obama 14,755,641
Clinton 14,122,005
Posted by: JON | May 5, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Lookup
I’ll always remember Harkin smiling and applauding behind Howard Dean when Dean went on his famous rage.
I’ve disliked him ever since. He acted like a complete and highly challenged moron.
Posted by: A | May 5, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
I guess since we are talking about the past, lets also talk about Obama voting to repeal the gas tax in Illinois. The same thing that he is calling a gimmick now. Instead you focus on something completely different that Bill Clinton did or did not do years ago when circumstances were quite different.
Posted by: Glenn McGahee | May 5, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
You for got contest won
Obama:31 Clinton:15
Posted by: Vanessa | May 5, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Hillary and Bill are reaching for straws and trying to fool the people in NC and IN it wont work the American people are fed up with the Clintons, Bushs, and the old sneaky McCain Bush want-to-be politics as usual. The American people are to smart for that and will turn the page. The talk radio Conservatives shook Jocks want the American people to believe that their for Hillary but they want the fight between Hillary and Obama to continue until November to try and make McBush look good that want work either.
Obama’s state wins 31 lost 15, Delegate count 1750 +/-, Negatives are way down, Better nominee
Clinton’s state wins 15 lost 30,
Delegate count 1611 +/-, Negatives way up. Not a good nominee.
Fund Raising Obama beats Clinton or McCain Expediently.
Registering new voters Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Bring the country together Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Overall, Obama beats Clinton or McCain.
Race against McCain, Obama better nominee.
Obama all the way!
Posted by: Lookup | May 5, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
fontapa writes:
“People are losing their houses, cars, and other property because they can’t make payments”
And here’s a news flash for you: millions of people, including a whole lot of young people and children, have no property TO lose — and of those, many are depending on SOMEbody who drives a car to some kind of crap job so that they can keep EATING.
So what do we hear from idol Obama? A lot of hand-wringing about mortgages. Nothing about the zillion people for whom HAVING a mortgage TO lose would be a good thing.
The poor don’t disappear just because the Democrats don’t permit their being mentioned, and the media corporations don’t see fit to put them on the “news”.
Clinton, God bless her, at least is TRYING to channel John Edwards!
Nominating Edwards would still be the best bet for the Democrats — it’s reasonable to suppose that elderly war-nut McCain will suffer some timely incapacity following which the Republicans will nominate a candidate best-suited to trounce the Democratic nominee. Only if that nominee is Edwards, is there going to be a Democrat who can prevail.
Aside from the general creepiness of his actual biography, candidate Obama can’t speak on his feet. If he were the nominee, the Dems would lose to the Republicans. Fine for post-partisan apparatchiks, but not so good for the poor.
Posted by: Belle Starr | May 5, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Glenn, welcome to the show
SEN. OBAMA: And, and that’s my point. I voted for it, and then six months later we took a look, and consumers had not benefited at all, but we had lost revenue.
MR. RUSSERT: So you learned from a wrong vote.
SEN. OBAMA: Yeah, I learned from a mistake. And, in addition, what happens is, is that this would come out of the Federal Highway Fund that we use to rebuild our roads and our bridges. And if we don’t have that fund, then we’re looking at thousands of jobs being lost in Indiana and in North Carolina.
Posted by: JON | May 5, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Belle Star -
John Edwards is an incredibly smart man with business acumen and a true understanding of class struggle and the long-term costs lower and middle income Americans have paid for constantly voting their short-term interests.
He would NEVER in a million years have endorsed this absurd plan. He’d have seen it for the fraudulent bounced check that it is. He’d have seen how it is designed to HURT low income households in the long run, and would have sacrificed the potential votes he’d have gained and done the right thing, like Obama has.
Don’t pretend to speak for Mr. Edwards, you Republican poser. He’d be outraged at your claims.
Posted by: fontapa | May 5, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Belle Starr
I don’t think anybody believes Obama (aka Soetoro) gives a damned about the poor.
He’s preaches hope and delivers nothing. A real bag of hot air!
Posted by: A | May 5, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
fontapa
Edwards is an ambulance chaser.
Posted by: A | May 5, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
What excuse(s) will Hillary have after NC and IN cast their votes for continuing to stay in the race?
Posted by: Lookup | May 5, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
“Either NOTHING counts from her experience as Bill’s wife, or ALL of it counts. You can’t have it both ways…”
Either Obama IS a Muslim because he studied in Muslim schools when young or he is a Christian because he says so now. You can’t have it both ways? Or can you?
Obama voted for a gas tax relief bill three times when it was politically convenient but is now against it? You can’t have it both ways? Or can you?
Obama claimed Wright was his ‘spiritual mentor’ when it helped him win the Senate race but disowned him in this campaign only when it was too inconvenient not to? You can’t have it both ways? Or can you?
The list is long and so are our memories. We all learn from experience. The relief is just the first move, skinny on the promise with more to come.
Now do you want to play cutting heads or discuss problems of national importance? When the votes are counted in November, you can only have it one way, and some of us Democrats believe it would be better to win the White House over making a statement about what reformed goodniks we all are.
Unless the Supreme Court intervenes again at which case we all quit and go home… again.
Posted by: len | May 5, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Len -
See, he’s not trying to have it both ways. He never was a Muslim. Ever. No both ways about it.
He voted for gas tax breaks, and learned it doesn’t work, admitted it, and is not going to make the same mistake twice by supporting it now. Only one way about that…
He denounced Wright’s comments, but said the man was not ALL bad. Despite popular opinion, he may have denounced him in stronger terms the other day, but at no point did he say Wright is now irredeamable and dead to him. No two ways about that…
Hillary on the other hand hasn’t admitted a change of heart on NAFTA. She’s expecting us to beleive that while her husband was for it, she was FAKING support for it, but has always been against it. Trying to have it both ways there.
She wants us to beleive she gained experienc from working with Bill, that it was a Co-Presidency. But she only wants us to count the good stuff. It apparently was only a Co-Presidency when it just happened to be in line with her current position. The rest of the time she must have been faking it?
Her supporters want us to give her credit for things like the Peace in Ireland, but not the botched foreign affairs that failed to stop Bin Laden. She wants credit for the successful economy, but not for the recession that her husband’s actions created upon leaving office.
Now she expects us to beleive that she doesn’t see anything flawed with her gas tax holiday plan, when her own husband, her self-proclaimed closest advisor, saw PRECISELY what was wrong with it and said so on multiple occasions in the past.
What, are we supposed to beleive that on those days in their Co-Presidency, she was just faking agreement with him on gas taxes?
That’s what I mean by wanting it both ways. She’d have done better to just campaign on her own successes, not her husbands. Then people would be unable to tie his positions and blunders to her.
She made that bed, sir, now she can LIE in it.
Posted by: fontapa | May 5, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
John -Democrat writes:
“Obama is an scripted candidate with a gifted oratorical skills; but I should say reading oratorical skills because he is unable to debate or connect one on one with people.”
One thing I’ve noticed in the last couple of days is that at least one of the news networks has taken to showing footage of a really OLD Obama rally.
Obama’s good-looking, and baby-faced and telegenic. I don’t think he really IS much of an orator — unless you count repeating hypnotic phrases to a crowd that’s all het up to see a celebrity — an imitation of “charisma”.
Fortunately, he lost a lot of that in the Wright matter — giving that ponderous speech in Philadelphia, then going back on all his fancy feelings — which has exposed him permanently as just the same old same old.
Posted by: Belle Starr | May 5, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
In 1992 gas prices were $1.98 clinton took ofice and kept them below a dollar for almost seven and a half years we always pay mor for gas when republicans are in because they want to drill and that is what the on going fight why did we have 30 refinery’s in 1970 and now have just five they tell us we need more drilling and more refinery’s. To bad we never know who is the liar. just look how fast the first lady is on tv for aide to Burma but NO three days and many dead and not one hand lifted .off subject but even if I am for it still p#####me off
Posted by: Bishop | May 5, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
fontapa writes:
“how it is designed to HURT low income households in the long run … Don’t pretend to speak for Mr. Edwards, you Republican poser. He’d be outraged at your claims.”
I said NOTHING about Edwards and the gas-tax matter, and somehow I doubt you’d have a shadow of an idea WHAT might outrage Edwards.
What you don’t understand about poor people is that there isn’t a “long run”, just a continuing crisis.
When it comes to Republicans posing as Democrats, I’d worry more on that score about Obama’s longtime associates from the Weathermen.
Posted by: Belle Starr | May 5, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Belle Starr, I agree Edwards would have made a better nominee. But Hillary Clinton as second choice over Obama? I don’t think so. While you can argue the amount of credibility any politician has I believe Hillary has zero.
Posted by: indy_voter | May 5, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
indy_voter writes:
“Belle Starr, I agree Edwards would have made a better nominee.”
And that’s still a possibility. The more states vote for Clinton, the MORE it’s still a possibility: the Kerry wing is so closet-Republican, not to mention male chauvinist, that I believe they might do ANYthing rather than have Clinton become president.
Obama’s just another pretty face with the mob behind him. Who needs it? Speaking on his feet, Bill Clinton — like him or not — is a lot more adorable in action. This has nothing to do with “race” — it’s charisma, the real deal.
Posted by: Belle Starr | May 5, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
The elitist’s who support Barack Obama just don’t get it do they? When I got to the pump and there are two gas stations directly across from each other and one says 3.79 and the other says 3.78 I am going fill up at the 3.78 gas pump. Why? Because that penny matters to me if it means I am saving something. So if what Hillary proposes is going to save me a penny in the summer…so be it!!!! Now if you choose to pay more for you gas, than by all means you definitely should be voting for Obama.
President Hillary 08
Posted by: mona | May 5, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Mona, please don’t be fooled. You’re not going to see a penny extra. Hillary just wants your vote. Please do the research, it’s not going to happen no matter what she tells you.
Posted by: lisa | May 5, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
The OBAMA fanatics pick up lots of slogans from communists. They say nothing but just cry.
After this Tuesday, they shall have the real reason to cry when their OBAMA whine again.
By the way, have you heard anything positive from the inspirator OBAMA. His negativity and word-twisting ads will help the poll of his negativity soar.
He probably perspires so much that he needs an inspirator for himself.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 6, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm