By Jaketapper

May 25, 2008 8:15am

Carter: After June 3 “It Will Be Time For Her to Give It Up”

In an interview with Sky News in London, former President Jimmy Carter said that after the final primaries on June 3 in South Dakota and Montana, he expects the remaining 210 or so uncommitted superdelegates will announce who they’re backing in the Democratic contest, after which Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, will have to exit the race.

"I’m a superdelegate," Carter said. "I think a lot of the superdelegates will make a decision quite, announced quite rapidly, after the final primary on June 3…I have not yet announced publicly, but I think at that point it will be time for her to give it up."

Carter was asked if Clinton was achieving anything by continuing in the race.

"I think not," he said. "But of course she has the perfect right to do so."

Carter was hinting that he was a supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, as far back as April. The semi-endorsement came with strings attached, as that month Carter engaged in a public effort to engage with Hamas, which the U.S. government officially classifies as a terrorist organization. When asked by ABC News’ David Wright, Obama said he wouldn’t meet with Hamas and he said he disagreed with Carter’s decision to meet with the group — he called it a "bad idea" that gave Hamas "a legitimacy that was unnecessary" — but he stopped short of condemning the former president for doing so.

- jpt

User Comments

I think it is time for her to give it up now, but I can wait a week if I have to.

Posted by: Thinking | May 25, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Not achieve anything by staying in?
She already has achieved a lot, Mr. Carter. She’s achieved not allowing BIG MEDIA to push her out of a race because they think it’s over. She’s achieved getting all voters in the United States to feel like they’re vote counts and that it should count.
She’s achieved earning my complete admiration and respect. She is an inspiration, and my hero, something I couldn’t say if she had dropped out when they were calling for her to do so back in JANUARY.

Posted by: I AM | May 25, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Now comes the tidal wave of Carter haters… On the one hand a see some say “let the superdelegates decide”, but whenever they choose the opposite candidate, the superdelegate is reviled. The message is clear from some: “If you don’t agree with me then you are not using your brain.”

Posted by: MIguy | May 25, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Hillary will be in nomination on first ballot in Denver. The SD’s can make their choice, but choosing Obama will bring the Democratic Party to certain defeat.
Carter knows all about doing that.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

I AM asked: “Not achieve anything by staying in?”
She also achieved getting the most popular votes, the only democratic way of determining the winner, the delegate process being you only come out with extra delegates if you rack up big wins in red caucus states and certain congressional districts, which for some reason were black.
She also is not done till Florida and Michigan are seated in full as voted or revote.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

I don’t think that actually Hillary, despite what her or her supporters claim, really has much democratic legitimacy to gain in the race. The popular vote count is not actually a strong argument given that states have all been playing by different rules (at the very least primaries versus caucuses). The popular vote count, like it or not, counts for nothing in either deciding who the parties nominee is or indeed eventually in deciding who the President is.
As for Florida and Michigan, well its possible to say in Florida that it was an ok election, given all the names were still on the ballot. But even still anyone who voted must have been aware that they were not electing delegates, which starts to subvert the result astraight away. And in Michigan Obama’s and Edwards’ name weren’t even on the ballot, and I remember several vox pops type people saying ‘well I was so excited that I just wanted to vote, and she was the only name on the ballot I wanted to vote for.’ or similar. So Michigan is just a joke as an election. If that is what Clinton is holding onto then she would have no legitimacy as a candidate.

Posted by: markymark | May 25, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Every potential voter needs to read Obama’s own words in his books and also Michelle Obama’s college thesis and then decide whether they want them to lead our great American country. “Me thinks NOT”!!!!

Posted by: virginia | May 25, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

What people seem to be forgetting when HRC says she is ahead on votes, that the caucus states are not counted in the popular vote. If we have the popular vote taken from MI and FL, then we should also take the popular vote from all the caucus states, which will put BO WAY ahead on the popular vote. If we are doing “one person/one vote”, then B Obama wins. HRC is doing some fuzzy math, trying to rile up FL and MI. Either way, Obama has the vote.

Posted by: Willow | May 25, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

I have lot respect for Jimmy Carter but when it comes to choosing between Barrack and Hillary, I differ from him. Hillary is better qualified. The media has been very partial to Barrck Obama. Hillary is a true supporter of working class. I intend to stand by her side and pray the Almighty every day that she should be the Democrats’ choice. If the Democratic party turns a deaf ear to Florida and Michigan and dumps Hillary, I will stay out of the Presidential election in November. My vote and support are completely reserved for Hillary.
Hillary 08.

Posted by: Krishna Baru | May 25, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

She is hold onto a dream she and her hubby planning this for 8 years but not going to happen.She does not have the popular vote if EVERYTHING is counted.No one tell her she has LOST.She cannot except that the public doesn’t want or TRUST her.She is a mentl case right about now and needs help she also blew the chance she has for veep….

Posted by: older wh. lady | May 25, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

i think the bigwigs of the dem. party have made it plain they do not want sen. clinton in their party.
I think now is the time for a new poltical party.
the pundits on tv are all saying the dem. party will come together.
from what i have hearing here in my city
and if this is a conversation going on around the country. i do believe the dem. party as many of us have known it is over.
and it really is not such a drastic thing. we during this modern time have become so use to things being the same, and falling into step, and don’t make waves-we cannot see such a thing happening. but it will be good for this country.
if i am unable to write-in sen. clinton’s name on the ballot in nov.
i will vote for anyone else on the ballot except obama.
the whole process was not done right. and no doubt by the first of the year, someone will have written a book to point out to us just how wrong it was done.
my family and i have discussed all of the possibles of a mccain presidency.
and we are preparing to live with it.
the dem. party has talked so much about how mi and fl, must be punished for not following the rules. well the dem. party should have shown it could be fair to sen. clinton. and so could the msm.
this is not sour grapes, but i can show the dem. party, i realize the need for fairness as much as they have touted it.
so i will choose to send the dem. party a message from me-i will not vote dem. for obama,
and i hope their is a great exodus of people from the dem. party.
the dem. party should have stayed in the middle
obama and his far-lefts will be a disaster for this country.

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Everyone should just quiet down and let her do whatever she wants. She obviously has this thing about taking this thing into June even though she has no chance of winning. Like everyone has said and anyone with a brain knows once the primaries are over she will be exiting the race.

Posted by: Tom | May 25, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Go Figure
ATLANTA — Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton each picked up a delegate in Georgia on Saturday as state Democrats selected their delegation to the party’s national convention in Denver this summer.
Obama picked up another superdelegate later Saturday in Wyoming, then one more in Alaska. Obama also took a pledged delegate from Clinton at Alaska’s Democratic party convention Saturday.
That brings Obama’s overall delegates to 1,974 — only 52 shy of the 2,026 needed to secure the presidential nomination — to Clinton’s 1,779.
The two add-on delegates in Georgia are state party secretary Stephen Leeds, an Obama supporter, and Verna Cleveland, who was Clinton’s Georgia state director.
The add-on in Wyoming was state Rep. W. Patrick Goggles, who told the Associated Press after his selection that he will support Obama at the convention.
In Alaska, former Gov. Tony Knowles said he would support Obama for president.
Obama won Georgia’s Feb. 5 primary. Of the state’s 30 at-large and pledged delegates, 20 are Obama supporters and 10 are Clinton supporters. Georgia also has 13 superdelegates, with seven committed to Obama and three to Clinton. Three are officially undecided, including former President Jimmy Carter.
In Wyoming’s March caucuses, Obama defeated Clinton 61 percent to 38 percent, Obama picking up seven pledged delegates to Clinton’s five. He has the support of four of the state’s superdelegates, with two remaining uncommitted.
In Alaska’s caucuses last February, Obama got 75 percent of the vote, with the other 25 percent going to Clinton. Obama’s final delegate count was 14, including four superdelegates; Clinton’s was four, including one superdelegate.

Posted by: PittBull61 | May 25, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Jimmy Carter is another faithful husband and I am CERTAIN that part of his support for Obama is the desire to not see someone like Bill Clinton defile the White House again and if Hillary gets in? So does he.
Add that to Hillary’s death wish for Obama and her lying and I think the choice has become pretty clear for most sane people.

Posted by: Brian | May 25, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Come on, Mr. Carter, whatever has happened to you???
I didn’t think much of your presidency. Sure there was the oil shock, but your priorities along with your tendency to micro-manage everything were cosummately catastrophic.
You lost your bid for re-election by losing 44 of the 50 States, winning 49 Electral College votes, a mere 10% of Ronald Reagan’s 489. In New England, you only won Rhode Island.
With 70% of the popular vote you had won, Kennedy took the fight into the convention. Nobody should EVER blame him for having done that. It was YOUR OWN failed policies that lost you the election. It was NOT Ted Kennedy.
As mcuh as I never cared for the womanizing man who divorced his wife after her three miscarriages and who let poor Mary Jo drown, I don’t fault him to stand up for himself and his supporters. At the Convention, you got twice many votes as he did and you got the nomination.
That is the way it should work this time.

Posted by: Brent | May 25, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

This was supposed to be her year. She’s been working for this all are life and making all the right moves. She is 60 now and not getting any younger. She can beat McCain and become the 1st female president. She may have done some questionable things to get there, but hey, that’s the way the game is played. Her real policies are good and she’s has the power and persistence to get things done. Barack is only 46. He can run in 2016 with time to spare. We could get the best of both worlds.
—John

Posted by: John Johnson | May 25, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

this should have been the COUNTRY’ time to get back on the right track, with someone who knows the middle road-and has some experience. yes she has worked her whole life-doing good and helping.
barack obama, on the long timeline for serving this country-obama has done very little.
that is why in the beginning the black people and everyone else that claimed to be a democrat was and still is asking
“Who is obama and exactly what does he stand for?” this is not a question any american should have to be asking of a presidential candidate.
as a dem. if obama had been walking with us and growing his political resume’
we would know him.
i do not think obama will win
and if by losing all of the people in the dem. party he is going to lose, he should still win.
obama as president will be a disaster for our country.
we all still do not know what his change is all about.
all we have to look at of obama is his
record, and he does not have much of a record, to look at.
perfect storm of another disaster,
the country will suffer another four years.

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I have lost all respect I once had for the Clintons in this campaign. They have squandered their chance to have a once in a lifetime primary through petty accusations, pandering, and typical Clintonian idiocy. I hope after this summer we never EVER EVER EVER have to hear from Bill and Hillary again. I honestly cannot believe their are still people out there who defend this sort of stuff.

Posted by: gawley | May 25, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

In late 1970′s, Mr. Carter’s National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski flew to Pakistan to personally meet Osama bin Laden and his fellow Afghan jihadists, telling them, “Your cause is right. God is on your side.”

Posted by: betty | May 25, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Carter should be proud. He personally created the Reagan Democrats, and now he and the DNC are doing their best to drive them back to McCain after Clinton brought them back into the fold. Hillary would keep them Democrats.
Fine, and what’s left of your party will be pure left wing, with Obama backed by Carter, Kerry, Pelosi, Dean, and the left wing establishment, the same ones who are utter failures in Congress and will continue to be, but there won’t be much left to your party.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

gawley,
when did you ever have any respect for sen. clinton?

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

worldcitizen,
And everyone KNOWS the Clinton history in which is why she will not be the nominee. For the blacks and anyone who didn’t know him before are the ones who have taken the time to get to know him and have listened to what he has to offer. Those of you who refused are DEADLOCKED and creating your own disaster.

Posted by: PittBull61 | May 25, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

worldcitizen, I had a lot of respect for Hillary Clinton during her time in the Senate. She demonstrated she could work across the aisle and was much less a strident political hack than she has become during this primary. Though I disagreed with some of her policies, she always struck me as at least competent and probably quite gifted, as well as magnanimous. However, her behavior in this campaign – with her pandering and her willingness to tear apart the party to get elected – has completely shocked and appalled me.

Posted by: gawley | May 25, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Rick from Pa,
Ok, this is where it gets UGLY and it’s obvious you’ve done your homework but it unfortunately will NOT work.

Posted by: PittBull61 | May 25, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

pitbull61
when tom joyner-was raising money for the HBCU’-who was by his side-a clinton
when bill gates, and dr. without borders were raising money to provide affordable meds for mostly africans and black americas aids pts-who was by his side-a clinton
since this is memorial day weekend
who recognized the service of black ww2 soldiers and gave the highest medal for valor be given a black soldier.
and it was not carter.
it was a clinton.
i could go on and on-but you know this.
too.
the clinton’ have a long history of trying to level the playing field for blacks and underserved people. but especially the black people of this country.
a good history you can deny all you want as most of the black people have done. which is a shame.
where has obama been?

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Losers need not apply. As a Hillary supporter, we expect to elect Hillary as the first Woman President of the United States of America. These males of the democratic leadership ought to convene their own conference and do to each other what they have done to Hillary. Don’t forget to bring their annointed one and have this lovefest.

Posted by: benvictor | May 25, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Why anyone including Hillary would listen to any advice from Carter is a wonder unto itself. Carter had his own intellegence break-down in the late ’70s by allying himself with the Muhadjadeen in Pakistan…we supplied them with weapons against the Soviets…after that they turned those weapons on us. Bin Laden was assumed to have be sane…he is not…and nobody ever mentioned this to Carter.

Posted by: parkerknoll | May 25, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Carter was the worst president. I do not care what Carter thinks about anything. Why are these people trying to tell Hillary what to do? I am sure Hillary (and Bill) will do whatever they decide.

Posted by: Carter was the worst | May 25, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

gawley,
all of the things you said in your comments up to the word however,
still stand for sen. clinton.
the good things you said about sen. clinton cannot be said about obama.
obama said himself-when he got into the senate, he had his presidential race.
and from your word however, can be applied to obama.
sen. clinton is the more qualified, and would have been good for the country.
but with obama since he does not have much of a record for the american people to look at.
i will say the country is going to be good for obama.

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

You’re all like a bunch of children wanting your own way. Obama is no more the great savior of our nation than Hillary is the big B. many of you misogynistic writers label her. It’s politics as usual along with skewed opinions and unrealistic expectations. Is it no wonder George W. was voted into office twice and now has the lowest rating of any president? He didn’t get into office by accident, he was voted into office. The scary thing about voters is that they get caught up with the myth and mysticism of candidates and then wonder why they are disappointed later. My dog would make a better president than Bush right now so just be thankful there are two candidates out there that might actually be able to lead us out of the mess America is in. If you need to do some name calling at someone then just look in the mirror and you will find the perfect person.

Posted by: Richard Natoli-Rombach | May 25, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Many say that a McCain presidency would just be a third term for Bush. That couldn’t be as bad as an Obama presidency, which would be a second term for Carter.

Posted by: Buford Gooch | May 25, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

worldcitizen
I don’t argue the accomplishments of what the Clintons have done for AA’s. The accomplishments haven’t gone unnoticed but AA’s have helped them as well. What I was referring to is as of late and pertaining to this campaign when all hell has broken loose because of the comments she’s made, the lies she’s told and so forth. I held HRC with the highest regards and respect until she played the race card. Race was not even a factor until FAT Rendell started that mess in PA. “Conservative whites are just not ready to vote for a Black man as President”. She ran with that afterwards and hasn’t stopped since. Yet his quote with small towns clingling to guns and Religion was just as damaging but he was misquoted and the MEDIA ran with that infiltrating the minds of people who were already on the fence about BO but wasn’t quite sure. Suggestions are always powerful but oftentimes they are MISLEADING. With her latest blunder about the RFK scenario, it was said that candidates don’t just blurt out stuff. It is usually a rehearsed situation and(This is ONLY my belief) that although she has somewhat apologized, who is to say that she didn’t mean it for real. Hence; knowing that the Obama campaign was going to react on this to garner more sympathetic votes. Should’ve, Could’ve Would’ve will not matter after June3d anyway. If the tables were turned and Obama was in this position, the outcry from Clinton supporters would be worse.
Peace and Prosperity to all

Posted by: PittBull61 | May 25, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

I guess if you are on a sinking ship at sea you should “give up”, let the water flow in and the ship sink. Never give it all you got to protect your loves ones, just give up…is that the ideals of America now? Just give up and pack it in? What has happened to the spirit of America? You have a serious problem in that both candidates have millions of votes…when you tell the lady (and why the lady when neither has the 2,025 votes necessary to win)—changing the rules to get the man into office) to pack it up, you will destroy a vision of a woman being President for a lot (millions) of people. Hope you have a counter plan to deal with this phenomenon because its coming down the pike.

Posted by: Anne | May 25, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Why can not HRC Close The Deal..?

Posted by: Bob Green | May 25, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Why doesn’t he shut up? Why doesn’t he just go away and stop imposing himself into the process? Carter is and always will be a failure as a president. There can’t be any change to that fact. He can be a decent human being by staying out.

Posted by: Frustrated Voter | May 25, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

America may have President Carter’s second term. voters should think hard before you cast your vote.

Posted by: Whatever | May 25, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

I wonder why Hillary and some folks do not understand that the whole process has been all about competition.
There must be a winner and a loser in any competition. Rudi Guliani who happened one time to be the frontrunner the same time as Hillary was, he raised his hands up and left the campaign after realising he could not make it.
I beg Hillary to be brave and act like him, and she will be respected for doing so.

Posted by: Peace | May 25, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

She certainly can stay in the race to the end, but is it doing her any good? It doesn’t appear to be. I think it also is emphasizing her inability to bring her party together. She continues to engage in wedge politics, and that pretty much says it all.

Posted by: mary | May 25, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Carter was the worst….
The title of “Worst President” belongs to President George W. Bush and this notion of a thriving Democracy in the Middle East.

Posted by: Martin | May 25, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

To Mary:
Nicely put
To Obamabreaker:
It is your constitutional right to vote for whomever you please.
Peace and Prosperity

Posted by: PittBull61 | May 25, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

So many people are cynical about politics and we all have very good reasons for it. Let me tell you, though…I have been volunteering an incredible amount of time to his campaign. I have traveled to Iowa, Wisconsin, and Indiana to knock on doors. I have made calls to nearly every state, most of the time in the evenings when I just wanted to relax after working all day. At a small gathering in early March, Barack was speaking candidly about the election. The Ferraro comments had just come out and he said that there are a lot of Washington politicians who are simply so used to how things are done (or not done) that they resist change. I have been supporting Barack because he really will make changes as president. Whatever challenges require the involvement of the American people, he will be able to meet those challenges because he has greatly inspired so many people. With an honest president who sincerely wants to end the war in Iraq, improve veterans’ benefits, create jobs and improve the economy, and significantly reduce global warming (among many other things), we will be very fortunate. I know this because when Barack spoke at the events my gut told me that this person is incredible. He is the kind of politician we could only have dreamed about before. Yes, Hillary would have been a good president, but just being better than a republican isn’t enough. Having Sen. Barack Obama as our president will engage so many people in our political process that as a country, we will see real change. That is the change that we can believe in.

Posted by: Bethany | May 25, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

This coming from a former president who couldn;t get the Iran hostages released, and then they were only released after he left Washington airspace. Let him go back to the peanut gallery..ooops, peanut farm.
Know Obama…..no Obama
No Hillary…..no vote

Posted by: char19145 | May 25, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

C’mon guys let’s be serious. Whether you’re an Obama or Hillary supporter, you have to agree that the person who’s is the lead in votes is supposed to be the winner, right? If Hillary was ahead the way Barack was you guys would be calling for his head if he refused to drop out? This is what annoys me. The Hillary camp wants the rules to be bent for Hillary and that’s not right. It’s downright wrong and the party will pay dearly if it gives the loser the nomination.

Posted by: Alex | May 25, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

I had heard about the books Obama had written and read one this week that belonged to a friend. After reading that book and reading some things that Obama actually said, I could never vote for him. I think any American that read it and still voted for him does not love this country or have the best interest at heart. I urge each of you to read it yourself and not take my word or anyone else’s word on these forums. If he is elected it will not be in the best interest of America.

Posted by: barefootboy9 | May 25, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

C’mon guys let’s be serious. Whether you’re an Obama or Hillary supporter, you have to agree that the person who’s in the lead in votes is supposed to be the winner, right? If Hillary was ahead the way Barack was you guys would be calling for his head if he refused to drop out? This is what annoys me. The Hillary camp wants the rules to be bent for Hillary and that’s not right. It’s downright wrong and the party will pay dearly if it gives the loser the nomination.

Posted by: Alex | May 25, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

worldcitizen
Your views are appreciated as well, you seem to be levelheaded. Yes, Rendell started that mess in Pa. Which astounded the AA community because their votes helped him become Governor. As far as Lewis is concerned, I believe he’s a delegate from Maryland. I don’t think it’s so much so that AA’s threatened his re-election more so than his district voting the majority for Obama. To me that is just politics.
Peace and Prosperity

Posted by: PittBull61 | May 25, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Can we recall the basics here?
Hillary was out of the running for me from day one because of showstoppers in both domestic and foreign policy:
1. Domestic: Failure to push through universal health insurance in 1993, when there was enormous initial sentiment for it as there is now. I put the blame here sqarely on her. She ran her hearings like Cheney did his energy hearings– in secrecy. Her arrogant “my way or the highway” attitude was not only Bushian before there was a W, it alienated her own party to the point that she lacked sufficient support *on both sides of the aisle* to even bring a bill to a vote. This campaign indicates she has learned nothing and changed nothing. The failure traces to fatal flaws in her character and would make her a disaster as a leader.
2. Foreign policy: not just the Iraq war vote, but, unpardonably, the nay vote on the Levin amendment which could have forced W to use diplomacy first. It is the height of disingenuousness for her to say now she expected Bush to use diplomacy first when she voted against an amendment that would have required him to. Thousands of American and Iraqi lives have been lost, trillions of dollars will be misspent, and we have become less safe due to diversion of our troops from Afghanistan/Pakistan where the real threat always lay and the wasting and wearing down of our armed forces. This was inexcusable political triangulation on Clinton’s part and she must not be rewarded for it.

Posted by: LE3 | May 25, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

She said evil things too many times.
Hillary is a despicable woman and
should be run out of town on a rail
We don’t need the likes of her-we have too many good people to choose from.

Posted by: srireddy | May 25, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

When wikll this senile old man just go away, Carter the most useless president in American history,.Sheesh just wondering who died and left him this ocuntry since he is now in the middle of everything.

Posted by: stormcloud | May 25, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Bob Green
The question is why canN”T Obama close the deal?
If he had won New Hampshire AFTER the pundits had predicted the end of Hillary’s world…
If he had won California AFTER the huge rallies Oprah, Arnold’s wife, JFK’s daugher and Ted Kennedy did and Reuters/Zogby’s prediction of a double digit win…
If he had won Massacusetts where both Senators and the black governor had endorsed him and campaigned for him…
If he had won Ohio or Texas…
If he had won Pennsylvania…
If he had won Indiana where a third of voters live in the Chicago media market and he had predicted he’d win…
If he had won W. Virginia which voted for Jimmy Carter (one of 6 States) in 1980 and still has Democrats as Governor and both Senators…
If he won Kentucky where Abe Lincoln was born…
Ted Kennedy three weeks ago was quoted in Boston Herald as saying time was “running out” (his OWN words) for OBAMA to close the deal. Now he still hasn’t.
DoesN”T that tell you something???

Posted by: Brent | May 25, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Superdelegates are suppose to do what is best for the party: Pushing Hillary out is not one of them. There are good arguments why superdelegates should go with Hillary Clinton against the republicans. Clinton should continue until the final casting of votes at the convention, which is one debate Obama cannot run away from.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 25, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

My God, does anyone remember the Carter Presidency. The Iranian hostages, soaring inflation and a floundering administation. He was such a good Democratic President that he ended up giving the American people 12 years of Republicans in the White House. He’s better left to building houses for Habitat for Humanity than he is as a political commentator. Stay in Plains Jimmy and for heaven’s sake quit meeting with terrorist organizations like Hamas. With friends like you the United States doesn’t need many more enemies. Its just another attempt by Barack Obama and his supporters including Jimmy Carter to push the little woman out of the Democratic Primary. Hillary Clinton has every right to stay in this primary and take it to the convention if she so desires.

Posted by: David Andrews | May 25, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Hillary doesnt have a chance to win, thats why she is turning face and trying ti get Florida and Mich. Delegates! This would be no better then Third world voting problems, like stuffing the ballot, cheating, lies, etc..

Posted by: Demo Rules | May 25, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Jake is consistent in his story line and his attacks. Apparently he has never heard of journalistic impartiality, journalistic integrity, or journalistic ethics.

Posted by: jan | May 25, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Shut up, Carter. You are good for nothing – everyone knows that.
Superdelegates are supposed to do what is best for the party: Pushing Hillary out is not one of them.

Posted by: Jkan | May 25, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Every potential voter needs to read Obama’s own words in his books and also Michelle Obama’s college thesis and then decide whether they want them to lead our great American country.
———
I agree. His books greatly influenced millions of Amerivans to support Obama. Thanks for the help!
Read Hillary’s as well and see where truth and fiction meet.

Posted by: Reading is Fundimental | May 25, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Some of you should short up and reason with your brain rather than your legs. It seems some of you walk with your head and reason with your legs.
Does it mean if Hillary didn’t win the primary she should be given the nominee simply cos she the owner of the party?
Where were you people when she was running her mouth at the primaries?
Listen those of you that are saying you’ll vote for McCain if she’s not the nominee will be cowards if you don’t do so.
Lets see who will suffer it at the long run some of you can’t afford two square meals and Hilary and Bill are posting $109M in 7 years. Thats the money for some states budget here in America.

Posted by: Cole | May 25, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

It is the faults of DNC Leaders and Some Super Super foolish Delegates if Dem loses the White House to GOP this November again. They keep continue endorse and support an inexperience young Senator beside a not very well-known background even they know he will lose.

Posted by: stock_craft | May 25, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

“HILLARY MUST ACCEPT WE HAVE DEMOCRACY NOT DYNASTY”
Well, not quite . . . you’re right we don’t have a dynasty but neither do we have a democracy. It’s a Republic and there are significant differences. The rest of your ramblings are a little hard to follow.

Posted by: rplat | May 25, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Carter’s judgement is dubious. He was the worst President in the 20th century and maybe in the life of the Republic.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Definately, Hillary should give it up! She could not even keep track of her husband, was at first in denial and is dividing the Democratic Party! Vote Obama!

Posted by: Peter S. Lopez | May 25, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize but that obviously means nothing to some people. It does to me. He understands the Middle East far better than anyone in this race.
All the Carter bashers refuse to acknowledge he had both a hostile Republican House and a hostile Republican Senate during his adminstration. He also had to deal with the aftermath of Nixon’s adminstration and the 70′s oil crisis’.
Just like Bush has created all-time record deficits, so did Nixon. When a country has insane deficit spending, the value of the dollar goes down, and the result is eventually inflation. Carter took the hit for this, but it wasn’t his leadership that caused it.
Unfotuately, whoever take the Oval Office will probably be the scape goat for the Cheney/Bush years. Americans are a “now” country. We don’t want to do what’s best in the long term. (Look at McCain and Hillary’s gas tax plan for example)
It will take more than one 4 year period to change our economic condition. I’m afraid Americans won’t want to hear the reality and will go with the person simply saying “no new taxes”.
SOMEONE HAS TO PAY FOR THE DEBTS OUR ADMINISTRATION HAS CREATED.IT WILL CATCH UP TO US. IT HAS ALREADY STARTED.

Posted by: Dig the Peanut | May 25, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

As a man born in Virginia in 1937 who was raised a bigoted,and racist man because that is what we were. I was to learn a different way when I found I could not marry my love in 1959 because she was of another race! We found a way to be married by cheating and were illegally married and subject to arrest in he State of Virginia for seven years. I carry a famous and patriotic Virginia name and she is a Native American. Her people owned this land before the current possessors arrived! I have campaigned for Hillary Clinton because she would make a damn good President. I am equally willing to support Barack Obama because he will make a damn good president, In addition those who would change that marriage law back if they had the chance would do well to grow up and accept the world as it as it is not as it has been. We know you well because we came from where you are. WE WILL ELECT HIM!! I feel more like a a proud American every day. My country as my continues to grow up.

Posted by: Patrick Henry | May 25, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I think Hilary should run until she wants to say its over. Obama is winning and I think that is the main point

Posted by: ouball | May 25, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Classic uniformed stuff…
We are a republic, not a democracy.
Carter is far, far, far from the worst president in history–I LOVE the ‘weak on defense’ stuff…since he was the first to give aid to the anti-communists in Afghanistan, as well as giving the go-ahead to the B-1, M-1, and MX. Just because they go ‘POOF’ and become operational later on doesn’t mean that later president deserves all the credit.
And believing Carter was responsible or could control the oil crisis and its effects is just plain stupid.

Posted by: jim | May 25, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Some Facts to share:
the reason that Obama’s campaign, his surrogates, and left-wing media – CNN, MSNBC tried to push Hillary out of the race since this February is simple, they are scared!!!
Ted Kennedy fought till convention even though he was 500 delegates behind front-runner.
At this point, neither of the candidate reach the magic number, and the delegates of two states that Hillary won has not been seated. Why should she drop out?
How could you expect Obama would bring the change to America, when he is backed by “OLD Politicians”, even OLDER politician than Hillary, including Carter, Kennedy, Pelosi, etc.
He claimed he was running a high road, while initiated “unfair personal attack” on Hillary, saying she has “character gap”…. It is ok when you discuss issues, tell voters the policy difference, but personal attack is really a “low low road”. They would take whatever sentence out of the context from Bill, Hill, distorted it, and attacked Bill or Hill. This is exactly what BO has been doing, saying one thing, and doing the opposite.
Wake up, America! Make wise choice…

Posted by: linda | May 25, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

A useless ex-president attempting to tell someone else what to do !! LOL

Posted by: Terry Mason | May 25, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Why don’t we all band together and elect a good decent person as POTUS. The three choices we now have are all nothing but corporate puppets. Also, why are you women supporters of Hillary so mad??? Just because you’re not getting your way is no reason to be jealous, or is that just a woman’s trait?

Posted by: corwallis | May 25, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

You know Jimmy Carter also supports Fidel Castro, Meets with Hamas. What else to say. Why do the democrats persist in not letting this go to the convention. That is a true Democracy. What is the deal? Is anyone seeing this like I am. They even want to still exclude Florida and Michigan. If they have any sense they would be courting both candidates and letting it play out. What does this say they will do for the economy and Iraq? This is a true joke. Jimmy Carter should be the last to call for her to quit.

Posted by: Georgiafire1 | May 25, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

If experience is the determining factor, consider this: Abraham Lincoln was a one-term Congressman, defeated in his run for re-election, lost in the election for the Senate, and yet is one of our greatest Presidents.
Conversely, George H.W. Bush’s resume indicated he was one of the most “experienced” people to ever run for President, yet is considered to be largely a failure.
Similar parallels can be drawn in many other cases. In fact, many of our most successful Presidents had very little experience in elective office.

Posted by: Bob from Michigan | May 25, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Jimmy Carter he was one of weakest presidents we ever had. He was among very few US Presidents who weren’t re-elected! His administration was floundering and one of the big reasons for Republican resurgence of the eighties. And thus began America’s decline. Sen. Hillary Clinton is far more accomplished than Jimmy Carter. He is in no position to give her any advice. He should stop telling Democrats ‘do this do that’ and stop giving advice how to win against Republicans; something that he himself failed, spectacularly! If Sen. Clinton fails to get the Democratic Party nomination, and since America is much larger cause than the Democratic Party unity, I think Sen. Hillary Clinton should consider running independently, for sake of saving our country form further decline, just like Bill Clinton did!

Posted by: sanjuan | May 25, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

We can’t blame the Dem voters for not picking the right candidate this time if we lose the general election because there are 16 millions voters who votes for Clinton against the other 16 millions voting for Obama. It is the faults of DNC Leaders and some super Delegates. They don’t want to make the Black voters angry which might hurt their future political careers. And They should listen to the voices of Dem voters in big and swing states and count all votes in Florida and Michigan or support a revote.

Posted by: stock_craft | May 25, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

char19145 – Carter’s administration did arrange the release of the Iranian hostages – Iran chose to hold them until Reagan was sworn into office and then the hostages were released. I remember sitting and waiting for the hostages release along with Carter and the rest of the nation. Carter won the Nobel Peace prize. People seem to forget that, especially when Hillary supporters wag their tongues about anyone who dares support anyone but their golden girl.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

The saddest thing is having the most unsuccessful Democrats running the show — thus perpetuating our inability to win. Obama has the support of every losing Democratic candidate in the last 40 years. A recipe for disaster!

Posted by: Tony | May 25, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

I love that Jimmy Carter, He just gets wiser and wiser with age…

Posted by: CuteNSmart | May 25, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Tony post: “The saddest thing is having the most unsuccessful Democrats running the show — thus perpetuating our inability to win. Obama has the support of every losing Democratic candidate in the last 40 years. A recipe for disaster!”
I agreed. I am wonder when will they wakeup? and how many more lessons they need to learn?

Posted by: stock_craft | May 25, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Sandy….my apologies, I misspoke on the hostqage situation. However, I do think more affluent people have called for Hillary to drop out, why anyone would listen to him, I don;t know. Back to the peanut farm anyway.

Posted by: char19145 | May 25, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Hillary supporters have REALLY lost their minds over this race! May be they should get to a doctor and ask for an increase in their Valium!

Posted by: Mark | May 25, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Carter is wrong.
Most democrats want her as our president.
She has the popular vote.
Despite fraudulent caucuses.
We are BEGGING Clinton to stay in this race as
long as it takes to LEGITIMATELY choose a nominee.

Posted by: guava | May 25, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

I love Jimmy!! He has the courage to speak his mind, I just wish he would go ahead and endorse Obama…Get it over with!!

Posted by: sai.mati | May 25, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Obama is the one who needs to give up. This guy is a bigger joke than Carter, Kerry, and Gore combined.
Obama/Rev. Wright ’0-never

Posted by: John | May 25, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Obama has proven to me that he can lead and he does unite. I was a Hillary supporter up until two weeks ago, Reality sets in, and I will not be the cause of causing a division in my party by trying to blackmail others by claiming Id vote for a Republican…I love my country too much to go there!

Posted by: Mandy | May 25, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Obama & Carter are so similar. Both have huge hearts, tremendous smiles and are well-intentioned. Yet, neither one of these men has a clue about how to run a nation. If Obama gets the nomination, the Democratic party is doomed. God Bless ‘Em, they are both “likeable enough” – but America needs a fearless leader, we need HILLARY!

Posted by: Carlos | May 25, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

The California superdelegates are swinging to Senator Obama. He is 52 delegates short of wrapping up the nomination. Both Montanta and South Dakota are in his camp. By June 3rd the nomination process will be over. I respect Hillary’s supporters’ loyalty to their candidate, but it is time to look forward to the general election and the issues rather than continuing to downgrade each other. We need a Democrat in the White House – not bomb, bomb senior moments McCain.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

An unfair or “rigged” election is one in which participants do not follow the agreed upon rules for voting. FL and MI did not have a valid primaries, period. Not even the “winner” claims to have participated in the contest.
It is exactly the same as being sold a movie ticket to see a movie that was cancelled. You entered the theatre w/o knowing the movie was cancelled, so you bought something that was worthless. The only thing you can do is get a refund or select another movie. The people that watch the news or read the papers didn’t go to the theatre looking for the movie because they knew it was cancelled.
It pays to be informed when selecting your ticket, yes?
Obama ’08!

Posted by: Don't be late | May 25, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I do not think she should give up. It is 100% bureaucratic BS to not count the votes of voters in Florida and Michigan. I mean honestly, the elections in both states were accurate and held to standard, it is quite unjust to rule them out because of a miscommunicated election time. This is America where people have a right to vote and a right to be counted, I think it is wrong for this right to be violated because of something as stupid as a date, when all other standards are met. This is a democracy for crying out loud, not a dictatorship.
There are many people wondering and commenting about sex and race in this election, this is completely irrelevant. The most important thing is who will run the country better…McCain or Clinton. The media is pushing Obama because they know that he will not be as strong a candidate against McCain as Clinton. I think a lot of people are buying into the bias of the media. Even if Obama wins the primaries there is a very incredibly slim chance that he will win as president. If you watch the reports contrasting McCain and Obama, you will see that already they are biased towards McCain. Clinton is right…the last thing we need is someone who quits…FIGHT HILARY HANG IN THERE UNTIL THE END!!

Posted by: 4 Democracy | May 25, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I don’t have a problem waiting until all of the primaries are done, but then it has to be quick ad she has to give a great speech to support Obama. No VP slot for her, 8 more years as a senator, maybe speaker, then she she can run again.

Posted by: Louis | May 25, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

“United We Stand, Divided We Fall” Obama has tried to Unit Us and Hillary has tried to Divide Us! The choice is clear, Obama for President!

Posted by: Demo Rules | May 25, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

HILLARY DEOS NOT HAVE THE POPULAR VOTES BY ANY MEASURE….
Well, except “Hillary’s” way of counting – which no one is buying. We, and the DNC, know she’s not counting four whole states and gives no votes to Obama in MI.
Clinton’s supporters are like the sheep in Orwel’s Animal Farm. Anything Hillary says, they just repeat it until they belive it.

Posted by: Animal Farm Sheep | May 25, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Sandy wrote: “The California superdelegates are swinging to Senator Obama…”
I think you might be right but believe or not John McCain could get California this time. Democrats will pick GOP President this November. History shows that they could vote for GOP Governor and it means that they could vote for a GOP US President too.

Posted by: stock_craft | May 25, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Louis:
What makes you the one who can oder us, Hillary supporters, what to do, and more importantly telling Hillary what to do, like you said Hillary must give a great speech to support Obama?? Obama is unelectable. Obama and DNC are winning the battle and losing the war.
I will NEVER vote for Obama.

Posted by: minil | May 25, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Hillary keep fighting if not for the democrats ticket go indpendent.

Posted by: chris | May 25, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Hillary should be forced out of the race for trying to bend the rules on FL. and MI. She is so untrustworthy and evil, I would expect something like this from a Neo-Con, Not even a Republican would go so low!

Posted by: Mark | May 25, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

I agree with the Hillary Math comment below.
Can any Hillary supporter tell me how FL and MI will change the outcome?
They WILL, no doubt, be counted in some way. But Obama is still ahead in delegates no matter what. And by popular vote, (assuming you count MI and the caucuses FAIRLY), Obama is still ahead.
Please explain how you and Hillary rationalize giving Obama 0 votes in MI is fair since you’re claiming “every vote should count”
What about the four caucus states that Hillary has left out completely in her count? Do their votes not count now?

Posted by: Anyone? | May 25, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

I think Hillary should run as an independent. Obama will ruin the party.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

stock_craft – perhaps,IF the Repubicans had a strong candidate who was supported strongly by is own party – McCain is not. McCain is not match for Senator Obama – I am sorry you do not see that.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

“United We Stand, Divided We Fall” Obama has tried to Unit Us and Hillary has tried to Divide Us! The choice is clear, Obama for President!………………………………….Well said Demo Rules!

Posted by: chris | May 25, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Why don’t the Democratic party cronies leave Clinton alone? She has worked hard and it should be her decision when to quit. It’s obvious that the Party Bosses and the Big Money people have anointed Obama from the start even though he has little to no experience. Hillary remains my presidential candidate no matter the outcome of this primary.

Posted by: sue | May 25, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

I don’t think Obama can unit us, it will get in the way of his ability to unite us.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Sandy, let wait and see. We, the middle and working class can wait other 4 years for GOP in the White House. I don’t think John McCain could be worst than G.Bush, anyway.

Posted by: stock_craft | May 25, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Carlos: I highly disagree with your reasoning. The one major trait it takes to make a President, is the wisdom, intelligence and good common sense to select a team of the best expert individuals from all categories of government expertise that is available. Senator Obama has demonstrated this capability in a huge way, putting together a team capable of defeating one of the most potent and powerfully connected political dynasties of modern day political history. Jimmy Carter, while a likable guy, lacked this ability, as did George Bush and also John McCain. And, he did it with plenty of cash left over I might add.

Posted by: 1masterstroke | May 25, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

The democratic party is anything but democratic!

Posted by: S | May 25, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

……McCain/Lieberman……

Posted by: There, I Said It......... | May 25, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Technically, Hilary has a right to remain in the race as long as she wants, even when there’s no chance of winning. But when she and her supporters start telling lies about how they’re leading in the popular vote, and how they need to stay in the race because Obama might get assassinated, it’s time for them to shut up and go away. All they’re doing now is destroying the Democratic Party.
There’s no way in hell I would vote for Hilary after her sleazy attempts to steal the nomination. Hilary would be little better than Bush, easily the sleaziest, most incompetent president in US history.

Posted by: rwkincaide | May 25, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

That is right. Obama put the team of Rev. Wright and Ayers together without help from anyone.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

George W. is easily the worst, exceeding Harding’s scandal ridden presidency, but Carter is close behind.
We will never find out how bad Obama’s second Carter term will be, because he will be demolished like Carter was by Reagan, creating the huge number of working class voters called the Reagan Democrats.
Clinton brought them home. Hillary would keep them. It all depends if you want a party that can capture the White House or have the working class leave and leave a small number of latte liberals.
The blacks I understand their voting and don’t expect them to stray from Obama for the next few decades, but it’s something they earned after having only Jesse Jackson before as a viable candidate in history.
And they’ve already done a lot for the Clintons, and the Clintons for them, so there’s a good history there that will never go away.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Jimmy Carter the Speechifier! Historically, Jimmy Carter is clearly recognized as one of the worst presidents the USA has ever known! Fortunately, we live in a country where freedom of speech is protected by the Constitution including incompetent past presidents!

Posted by: Mr. Blohard | May 25, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Sandy,
John McCain or Hillary Clinton, they are centralist. Neither of them is far right or far left. We, the middle and working class in California and all big and swing States definitely will vote for Hillary and if not than John McCain

Posted by: stock_craft | May 25, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I am a Hillary Clinton supporter, I always have been. She knows what’s going on in Washington, she always has. And she knows how to get things done.
Obama has no experience dealing with the Senate or the Congress, the people who run this country, he has no experience dealing with people who run the other countries, you know I seldom take phone calls from people I don’t know. I wonder if the rest of the world is the same way? HILLARY KEEP FIGHTING!
IT AIN’T OVER TILL THE LAST VOTE IS COUNTED!

Posted by: jola | May 25, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

1masterstroke: I respectfully disagree with you. Just because of Obama was able to
put an effective campaign team together does not mean that he will be an effective Presidential leader. He is surrounded by Party Bosses, Big Money, and a lot of anti-clinton supporters. If campaign execution reflects leadership quality then how come George W. Bush’s administration was an abysmal failure? After all, they had Karl Rove, the genius to strategize and divide the electorial map as red and blue. Come to think of it, Obama is very similar to Bush in that he is a puppet to the extreme left.

Posted by: sue | May 25, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

stock_craft – I certainly do respect your opinion – you seem like a reasonable, logical person rather than an attacker and name caller – refreshing to see on the blogs. However, my son is on his third tour of duty in Iraq. He has completely lost his hearing but the Marine Corps needs warm bodies so in Iraq he remains. I want him home – I honestly do not believe McCain can do that – I am hopeful that Senator Obama can.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Superdelegates–what a rediculous and useless concept.
They don’t have the courage to select the strongest, most qualified candidate to beat McCain. I thought that’s why the DNC had them to begin with…
The Democratic Party has become one big joke controlled by billionaires. They chose the inexperienced Obama to mold any way they want.
Hillary or McCain08

Posted by: cindy in nc | May 25, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Thanks Obama for deceiving patriotic Americans. Thanks Obama for “stirring up” racism, to the likes I have never seen before. Thanks Obama for proving “money does buy everything.” Thanks Obama for negating our only chance at having a knowledgable, Christian, humanitarian, democratic, economically and socially sound America. Thank you God, and that is God, Yahweh, for hearing the prayers of his people and giving Hillary Clinton the stamina and fortification to fight the good fight. Hillary supporters remain steadfast!

Posted by: jeep395 | May 25, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

minil – then you are in for a huge disappointment. Senator Obama will be the next president. You are certainly free to not vote for him if you so wish, but cutting off your nose to spite your face does you or no one else any good. It is time to stop putting down each other and look forward to the general election and fight for issues, not about personalities.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Carter was a big mistake — perhaps the biggest political mistake during the last century. Now, the democratic party is hell-bent to outdo that mistake.
Thanks to Pelosi, Soros and the rest of the minority ultra-libs who have successfully transformed the party into a central bunch of power brokers.

Posted by: S | May 25, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

I was just listening to Obama’s speech at the Wesleyan Commencement ceremony on live feed through CNN….
“Me, Me, Me, Me, and more ME….”
Doesn’t he know this is supposed to be about the graduates? That this is THEIR day, and that a Commencement speech is supposed to be about THEM and THEIR future and not about HIM and his CAMPAIGN??? How dare he take this opportunity given to him by Teddy Kennedy and hijack it for his political platform?
He is the one that needs to leave the race after June 3rd……………..

Posted by: SandyB | May 25, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

I love the photo’s ABC uses to explain the headlines. As if the characters are really reacting.

Posted by: KURT | May 25, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

SandyB
And some say he’s not arrogant! Imagine that.

Posted by: S | May 25, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

DemocratforMcCain, it is ‘write’ not ‘right’. You might be confused because of the Rev. Wright.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Hilary is trying to count every vote caste d for her.
This is good for her. What is wrong with Hilary keep pursuing her dream. Everyone has the right to pursue his or her dream. This is America.
It is written in our constitution.

Posted by: lkl | May 25, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

lkl, its not written in the Deomocrat party rules for this election. Thank you Howard Dean.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

No More Drama:
He MIGHT be “winning” now, but I guarantee you he won’t be come November, should he be the nominee……….

Posted by: SandyB | May 25, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Obama will be our new President this year! This is so exciting, No more Neo-Cons in Office!! wooohooo

Posted by: Silly | May 25, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Every time an Obama supporter of the Party establishments like Jimmy Carter asks Hillary Clinton to QUIT, she has increased her support among voters as the best candidate to win in November.
After Christopher Dodd suggested Hillary to quit on February 26 while endorsing Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton won Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island. Hillary has also won more votes than Obama since February 26th.
After Bill Richardson asked Hillary to drop out on Good Friday, Hillary Clinton has won more votes and primaries than Barack Obama.
After Patrick Lehy aked Hillary to drop out in March, Hillary has won more votes and primaries than Barack Obama.
After John Edwards asked Hillary to drop out on May 14th, Hillary Clinton has won more votes than Barack Obama.
The voters -NO the Party leaders establishments- had the chance to stop the race and they did not and their responses with record turn out should be a wake up call to the party leaders.
17 million voters will support Hillary Clinton taking the fight for Michigan / Florida votes and the nomination to Denver.

Posted by: Angel | May 25, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

T, I have never seen a sharper or more inciteful post. I certainly see why you are an Obama kind of guy.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

HilloryorBust, that is a brilliant analysis. You know the SD’s are paying attention to those numbers.
They can make their decision in August in Denver how the party will go, to the White House or back to the days post Carter.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Hillary2008, guess what you just did? You spelled out a BEAUTIFUL list of goals a church might have. There is nothing in your list that sounds bad. Economic parity means that individuals should get the same pay for doing the same job no matter what their race or gender. Etc. So maybe it is YOU who have a problem with ANY religion. Spirituality is a problem? Pullllleeeeez.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 25, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

OBAMA 08!!!
Bill and Hillary revealed their secret Friday on why she is staying in the race. They are hoping and waiting.

Posted by: leighg1 | May 25, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

SandyB – Senator Obama is clearly winning now – no need for the quotes -and he will win in November no matter how you may wish that not to be true. He is the strongest Democratic candidate we have had since JFK ran. And, it is about time.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

The “I can’t spell so I’m voting for Clinton” is hardly an argument. It makes even less sense to continue to call Obama an elitist when Clinton is very much a millionare elitist with a good education as well. And McCain has been a US Senator living the high faluting life in washington for 20 years, that in my book also puts McCain as an elitist. The elitist thing is a bunch of bull and it’s not a worthy argument.

Posted by: Scotti | May 25, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

sandy:
Thank you for your reading my post and replying. I am very sorry to hear that your son completely lost his hearing. You must be heartbroken beyond words. I wish I could alleviate your pain a little. I can see you now are devoted to this election and try to see the change therefore we all can live in a better world. I really do understand and see where you are coming from.
I do appreciate your style of posting, not name calling us, Hill supporters, and being more mature side. However, you will be in a rude awakening, if you truly believe that Obama will be the next potus. I am sorry but every analysis indicates that Obama is unelectable. Especially other Obama supporters alienated most of Hillary supporters for good, there’s no way to unite us. I am sorry.

Posted by: minil | May 25, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

I am starting to believe these Hillary supporters are really just Republicans wearing mask….I mean seriously why would anyone want to divide the party? I know Democrats want to keep McCain out in Nov. So I have to conclude that Hillary supporters who attack Obama are just really Republicans wearing a Democratic mask!

Posted by: sweetcaroline | May 25, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Was listening to Obama’s commencement speech. Very good. He has a way of connecting with the younger audience. I think he would make a fine president. If Hillary wins, though, I will certainly vote for her. The two are very similar policy-wise and are both progressive. Best case would be to see them on the same ticket, either one at the top.

Posted by: hey Scoob | May 25, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Sandy, you brought up a GREAT point. Blackmail. Yes, the Hillary supporters who THREATEN to vote for McCain JUST TO GET REVENGE for Hillary not winning if she doesn’t win, are actually BLACKMAILING the party. This makes no sense IF WE ARE INTERESTED IN THE ISSUES important to the American people and NOT IN PERSONALITIES. I believe the ISSUES should take precedence in our choices. Both Obama AND Clinton are very close in the issues. Putting personalities aside, either one of them would be better for America than McCain.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 25, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

NO MORE DRAMA – VOTE OBAMA :
What else do they have left but the “fear” card???

Posted by: sai.matib | May 25, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

[Carter] expects the remaining 210 or so uncommitted superdelegates will announce who they’re backing in the Democratic contest, after which Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, will have to exit the race.
Now read that statement several times and you will notice that there’s something wrong with it. Why is Carter so sure that the majority of those uncommited superdeleagates will vote for Obama?? Is it because the OUTCOME has been already predetermined? Since day one?? What a scam!

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 25, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

The Commander Guy:
“Why is Carter so sure that the majority of those uncommited superdeleagates will vote for Obama?? ”
Perhaps he is good friends with a majority of them??? Do you know how your friends will be voting?

Posted by: sai.mati | May 25, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Open Letter to the Democratic National Committee and Super Delegates
430 S. Capitol St. SE, Washington, DC 20003
The existing nomination process needs to be wrapped up ASAP. There is agreement that…”It is absolutely disgusting that Hillary would try to use the assassination of RFK to advance her already pathetic arguments, likely requiring a response from the Kennedy family, especially in light of what they are already going through.”
Excuses made by Hillary Clinton are absolutely unacceptable!!! Per Time magazine, “Her excuse now is that the Kennedys have been ‘much on my mind these days with the illness of Senator Edward Kennedy”, but that doesn’t explain what brought it to mind more than two months ago. Hillary Clinton said basically the same thing in an interview with Time Magazine on March 6, 2008.
Such a statement reflects extremely poor judgement on the part of Hillary Clinton. Such an individual THAT LACKS GOOD JUDGEMENT… SHOULD NEVER HOLD THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT OR ANY OFFICE OF POWER!!!
Change is Necessary

Posted by: Change is Necessary | May 25, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Yes Hilaryorbust, I support most of your arguments except for the fact that Obama cannot win if Hilary is not on top of the ticket. First am for Hilary unless she doesn’t win the Primaries. Obama will not win if the Democrats dont unite and support him. Most Democrtas are blinded with the color of his skin and judge likewise rather by his policies which are basically the same as Hilary’s but different in approach. Everyday I see hilary’s supporters still bashing Obama and Obama’s still bashing Hilary. I think if Obama can win ohio then he can win the presidency.Thats why I think he should concentrate more on winning Ohio. Dont think he can win Florida but feel he can break with Georgia or North Carolina.There are millions of untapped younger voters and Black voters in those States coupled with the entrance of Barr in the race though that is highly debateable. Think he can also win Iowa or Colarado otherwise other States will all go red as predicted. And yes he can but only if the Democrats are united. Lets end the bashings please.

Posted by: jayjay | May 25, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

And precisely what are Carter and the rest inferring by:
“by then it will be time for her to give IT up…”
Give what up?
Maybe another sexist remark by the “good old boys club??????”

Posted by: SandyB | May 25, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Change is Necessary :
Thank You, That is an excellent letter!

Posted by: sai.mati | May 25, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Isn’t it amazing that when two people argue who was the best baseball player, actor, scientist, composer, etc. both usually consider the other’s choice to be a worthy candidate. But when it comes to politics, the sun shines out of your candidate’s anus while the opponent is the spawn of Satan! I’m supporting Clinton as long as she runs but, assuming Obama gets the Dem nomination, Obama will get my vote in Nov. because I’ve been paying enough attention to the issues to know that his positions are much closer to hers than McCain’s. This isn’t a popularity contest, folks. And none of the three remaining candidates is a god, but none of them will do as much terrible damage to our country as Bush has. As NY mayor Bloomberg said, no matter who wins, at least we’ll have an adult in the White House.

Posted by: The_Mick | May 25, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

The_Mick
Its not a popularity contest? Well than how do they win?

Posted by: Silly | May 25, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

SandyB, Hill the Bosnian General was not for women, she has always voted with these old boys in the Senate. She has never been a strong supporter of the issues confronting women and has always defended her Bill against WOMEN who were mishandeled, and mistreated by Bill. Let us reject being misled about a very false claim re sexism in these elections. Hill is not ready or qualified to lead America and the good example is how she has managed her campaign: 30 milion in debt, that is a lady nobody will trust with the management of the American Economy. God bless America and God bless Obama.OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | May 25, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

ChayaFradle – thanks! One thing I do find very odd is that as much as I want Senator Obama to win, as much as I want him to be president, I would never threaten to vote for McCain because my candidate did not win the nomination. Blackmail never works – the instigators always get caught and end up in the mess they, themselves, created. As you noted, the two candidates are very close on issues. It is my belief that Senator Obama can carry out his directives, while Hillary has burned too many bridges to have the same UMPH! behind what she may want to see happen. The problem with burning bridges is the bridges eventually collapse because the support gives way.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

It is a bit sad to read the comments. I am not from the US, hence can’t vote but among many carefully watching the campaign. America has still a lot to loose (even after the disastrous Bush years) but is still an important voice.
For the rest of the world it does not matter too much if Obama or Hillary make the race, as long as we don’t have another Republican government. However, Hillary will never be received as a second Bill. She is too bitter and (at least to a non-US spectator) appears calculating and fake. Obama seems like a careful and more honest guy. And why would inexperience in matters of war be a handicap?! Perhaps for a Republican candidate. Which European head of state would be experienced in war?
I really hope that the American voters get their act together and vote united for change and are not afraid of a smart president for a change. It will have a huge impact on the global stage, but perhaps even more be one of the last chances to put America on democratic feet again.

Posted by: doo | May 25, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Scott:
Of course he’s NOT talking about sex. Do you honestly think I don’t know that?
My point was that the way the statement was phrased, it COULD have been taken that way (as quite often that phrase IS used to describe sex)……
And it is certainly a more plausible inference than Obama and all of his maniacs taking Hillary’s reference about the fact that RFK was still campaigning in the Primary election in June at the time he was killed, as a sure sign that she wants someone to assassinate Obama.
The idea that Hillary was inferring that is just as ridiculous as the idea that Carter was referring to sex in his remark, but Obama and his maniacs will jump at any chance to twist what she says to their advantage……

Posted by: SandyB | May 25, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Carter, the most ineffective president of my lifetime, is enjoying his moment in the spotlight pretending that anything he thinks is pertinent.
I was just reading about Ted Kennedy’s career in today’s paper. It mentioned how he only gave up his fight to wrest the nomination from Carter, the incumbent, at the convention. He trailed Carter by a much wider margin than Clinton trails Obama. So again… why exactly should Hillary drop out?

Posted by: HoosierSue | May 25, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Here’s something for you to ponder
Many of us Hillary supporters have reached the conclusion: President McCain is far preferable to a President Obama. We don’t care what party we have been in, what party we are going to be in, what party wants us, what party does not want us, or what party Hillary wants us to stay in or out of (if she does not get nominated). We SIMPLY do NOT care.
What we care is we do NOT trust Obama. Period. We do NOT want him in the White House. There are tens of millions of us that will vote this November, which you can take to the bank. We are not going to go to any caucus. We are just going to have our voices heard.
For all of you supporters of Obama who want him to get nominated, the question for you is: is President McCain better than President Hillary Clinton. If your answer is yes, then BY ALL MEANS keep your fight to get Obama nominated.
But IF your answer is no, the only sensible thing to do is to ASK Hillary to STAY in the race. Let’s all then have a dialogue in Denver. The two of them can have one-on-one debates and let the people who WILL vote in November observe which one of them can better represent the Democratic Party.
With the price of crude beating $135 a barrel and inflation sharply revised up (which led the Fed to dampen any expectation to lower the discount rate), the Iraq war is on the back burner (and by November it will be a non-issue in at least 45 States).
The guy who secured his nomination rather quickly in 1988 to challenged George H.W. Bush was ahead by over 10 points in polls throughout that summer. Then what happened? What is his relevance today? (Al Gore might have won.) What is George McGovern’s relevance? History has shown liberals in the Democratic Party who always try to overplay their hands on what gets nominated have a history of letting their uncurbed enthusiasm get over their head only to face a rude wakening.
Is it a coincidence that Bill Clinton is the only DEMOCRAT to have won a re-election since FDR? Have you any idea how long ago FDR won his last election? You can thank or blame Ross Perot however you want, but do NOT blame God. God did not stop Bill Clinton in 1992. It so happens nobody else did either.

Posted by: Brent | May 25, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

sandyB…
I see the hillary supporters doing this all the time, as a matter of fact you are trying to do it now by assuming Jimmy Carter was referring to sex.
And lets not forget Rev. Wright?? How many of you hillary supporters held on to those words like they were the gospel?
Lets not cast stones just at the Obama supporters when you know the hillary supporters have done the same.

Posted by: Scott | May 25, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

T, I am old enough to know stupid when I see it.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Scott:
Are you not able to read, or do you just hear what you want to hear?
I just said in my last post that I KNOW Carter was NOT talking about sex in his remarks.
The POINT was that the phrase he used COULD have been misconstrued that way, and for far better reasons than what Obama’s crazies read into what Hillary said about RFK.
And what exactly was there to misconstrue about the phrases made by Reverend Wright? I think HIS inference was very clear.
How many ways are there to interpret “GD America????”

Posted by: SandyB | May 25, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

democratforMcCain – I am from the old Democratic party tradition – however, I like many others my age, are looking for change – the old ways of the party no longer work.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Maybe it’s time for Mr. Voting rights to give it up.

Posted by: Ken | May 25, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Sandy,
I understand Americans and our problems. It is the war that bothers us the most beside the economic. I have a son is under of age of draft and a shaky job which could lose anytime too. But we can’t keep blaming the past and undo the mistake once it’s done. It might take us 10-15 years to fix the problem we are facing now and I don’t think an inexperience Senator can solve it. In real world, it is always easily to criticize the work we never did it or don’t have a chance to do it. He, Mr. Obama might make things worst before it gets better. Honestly, how much do we know about him beside of no experience? And I strongly believe most of the middle, working class don’t want to gamble by voting for him.

Posted by: stock_craft | May 25, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

T, I do not want to engage you in a dialogue. Your arguments lack merit and there is no payoff for my time.

Posted by: Sluggo | May 25, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Carter, you should give it up!
I recently heard that of all politicians, the person whose public image and actual personality are most conflicting is none other than Jimmy Carter. Mr. Rogers on the outside, but what on the inside?
In many ways, Hillary is ahead. Obama will never get elected, and she would. Why should Hillary give it up?

Posted by: april | May 25, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

You tell him Sluggo! :o)

Posted by: sai.mati | May 25, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

It is improper for Carter, who probably relates more to Obama than Clinton, to suggest that “after the next primaries uncommitted delegates will commit and that Clinton will drop out.” He may be stating the obvious to many but he is pulling the rug out from under Clinton and usurping those voters in the next primaries who may want to vote for Clinton. Keep your mouth shut Jimmy!! You were one of the worst presidents ever! Rember the ABC badges “Anybody But Carter!”

Posted by: gordon jackson | May 25, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

HoosierSue, Your assessment of Jimmy Carter’s presidency is way off in my opinion. I’d be interested to hear why you think he was ineffective.
Carter gets blamed for the Iran hostage crisis… because it happened or that he didn’t blow the bejezus out of Iran for it. He refused to negotiate with terrorists, plain and simple. People saw that as weak.
Showing the wisdom and foresight that republicans are famous for… Reagan and Daddy Bush seemed to have no problem dealing with terrorists and sold weapons to Iran, Saddam and Bin Laden. They even were nice enough to have the CIA help train the Taliban.
The economy did poorly during his 4 years (it was in the dumper after the Nixon/Ford administration), not his fault but he gets blamed… Republicans worship money so he is demonized for that.
Carter pretty much singlehandedly prevented a war between Egypt and Israel, a peace that stands today. Americans forget stuff like that, sad that we don’t give much credit for preventing war.
My other favorite that people seem to forget is that Carter had us on the road to energy independence back in 1977. He saw the danger of being dependant on middle east oil. He took the first steps to start that ‘apollo program’ for energy independence that everyone today seems to think we need. Carter even had solar panels installed on the White House. Reagan signaled his support for the idea of energy independence by having the solar panels removed shortly after taking office.
So yeah, I guess Carter was an idiot. Personally, I think we could use more idiots like Carter. The good news is that history is showing more and more the wisdom of Carter’s leadership.

Posted by: freakingnews | May 25, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

I campaigned for Jimmy Carter and I am going to tell you the last few years this man has gone off the deep end. He needs to put a cork in it and stay out of it.

Posted by: J | May 25, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

I brought it up simply to prove a point about how certain statements can be easily taken the wrong way, when that was not their intent. I know exactly what President Carter meant (however I will admit that I found his use of that phrase “give it up” a little odd), just as I know what Hillary meant by her RFK statement.
The media, Obama, and his supporters were relentless in their inferences as to her motives on Friday after Hillary made her comparisons about primaries lasting into June, when she never mentioned ANYTHING about Obama in her statement.
I think anyone with common sense would know she was not meaning any harm to Obama, but yet no one was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt just to use it as an excuse to keep pushing her out of the race.

Posted by: SandyB | May 25, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

well if you were over here you could know her better, doo. There must be some static in the international signals, other than your post.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

I truly believe that Jimmy Carter tried to change Washington. He believed that if he just did the “right” thing everything would turn out better. He was politically naive and turned out to be one of the worst presidents ever. He was president when oil prices and inflation were rocketing. He once joked about inflation by saying that we would all be millionaires. If that is not naive I just don’t know what it!!
What bothers me is that we are about to make the same mistake again. Obama wants to change things; he is vague about how this will happen; the “establishment” seem to like him and I have to wonder why; and he comes across as basically a nice guy. Is there any reason that I can wrap my mind around why this should not turn out to be another Carter era?

Posted by: gordon jackson | May 25, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

The two dont jive together – Carter meetin with Hamas and then suporting Barack. It was a COINCIDENCE!!! There aint no strings attatched with that unless yur devil imagination be kickin in two much.

Posted by: yashica | May 25, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

I doubt that many of the so-called Hillary supporters who say they will vote for McCain are really Democrats. I cannot imagine voting for a man who wants to continue the Iraq lunacy. I am a Hillary supporter but I will NOT vote for McCain!!!

Posted by: Two-cats | May 25, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

28% of Hillary supporters will vote for John McCain in November if Osama is nominee. Please include my family and all of my friends in church for a total of 47 people. We pledge that Obama WILL NOT HAVE OUR VOTES even Hillary asks us to do so!

Posted by: Tolkien | May 25, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Maybe the “monster” label and the “Tonya Harding” comparison weren’t that far off when you consider Hillary’s recent RFK gaffe. Personally I found Keith Olbermann’s remarks very revealing. The litany of campaign mistakes we have forgiven her for is impressive. I’d forgotten all the stupid things she’s said and lies she’s told in the last 9 months. Wow.

Posted by: 199 Green St. | May 25, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

I have read on BLOGS that the Republicans have got hold of some videos that will finish Obama but they want him annointed first and will choose their time to release the damnation. Given what happened with his pastor I find this too easy to believe.
He is almost certain to be the Dem nominee now and I think this is how the Republicans are going to win the White House again. When the Rep’s release their hot potato many of the split Dem’s will migrate to McCain and so will all of the undecideds. McCain will look a lot better than Obama when it comes to putting an X on the ballots.

Posted by: gordon jackson | May 25, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

stock_craft – agreed – we cannot change the past or undo mistakes – we can only hope to correct them. However, there is no guarantee that either McCain or Hillary could make the corrections either. So, I vote for a candidate who gives us hope for change, for the chance to get my third-tour-of-duty son home from Iraq, for the chance to better our relationships with other countries. I cast my first vote for president for JFK. I feel like I am re-casting that vote when I drop the ballot in the box for Senator Obama. Each one of us has different reasons for supporting who we support – these are only some of mine. I will not change your mind any more than you will change mine. However, actually enganging with intelligent people in a conversation even though we may not be on the same side of the fence, is a rare experience on a blog. Thank you!

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Next to BUSH… Jimmy Carter comes out looking like a GENIOUS..

Posted by: sondog | May 25, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I’d just like to take a moment to thank Clinton and he supporters for throwing America under the bus. It’s all about you folks isn’t it? Hold your breath, stamp your feet, take you ball and go home. How pathetic.

Posted by: remsleep | May 25, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

It’s useless to try to rationalize with irrational people who obviously have pyschological discomfort with electing a black man for president.
The MAJORITY of ALL Americans will elect Barack Obama as president and the rest of you will have each other to comfort.
Barack Obama WILL WIN!!! So please go somewhere else with your hatred remarks.
“The only thing to fear is fear…” FDR
That also go for you Republicans pretending to be Democrats.

Posted by: Dtruth4u | May 25, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

maybe he has a tumor making him say stupid things too!

Posted by: Chipo1965 | May 25, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Nowadays, people don’t need to be in the far left or far right to be Democrats or Republicans. Be Independent!
I will leave Democrat party for good if Hillary goes Independent.
Hillary or John McCain.
VOTE NO FOR OBAMA

Posted by: Tolkien | May 25, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

This is a campaign not a war against women and men. Sen. Clinton’s supporters are more into alledged sexism than they are the issues. With all that she has accomplished she and her supporters are so blinded by hate and the fact that this was supposed to be mine, that they can not see the harm that they are doing to the party. This bitterness paints an ugly color on the beauty of what she has done. Is this how she would answer the phone and
run a country by declaring sexism and claiming to be tired. We have already seen how she runs a campaign. I guess the media and Sen. Obama are the sexist that caused her campaign to be in debt and be so poorly managed. Wow they have more power than the Clinton’s.

Posted by: Le Le | May 25, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

I feel pitty for Hillary…..why not give up now….It is almost 90 mintues for the whistle to go…After all its 10 to 1…unless we bribe the referee…to overturn the result….and it must be a big kickback…….As for Obama account he has 40 Million Dollars while for her..she is in red with 20 Million debt….How will it be…..try hard…..

Posted by: kibs | May 25, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

democratforMcCain — I know you THINK you’re a democrat but you’re not. A democrat doesn’t say the things you have posted here and a democrat wouldn’t cast a vote for a guy like McCain. :-)

Posted by: sally | May 25, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Chipo1965 ” maybe he has a tumor making him say stupid things too!” What a horrible, unkind thing to say about any of the candidates, let alone one you do not support. Senator Kennedy has a horrific battle ahead of him – to make light of anyone with a brain tumor is beyond description.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Tolkien wrote: “28% of Hillary supporters will vote for John McCain…”
I think it will closer to 98% of Hillary supporters, half the Democratic Party leaving. It happened in ’80 when we left in droves when Obama lookalike Carter ran off everyone to Reagan. Carter won 6 states.
The Democratic Party will be left a shell of Marxist sympathizers like Obama if the SD’s choose him in August.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

It’s useless to try to rationalize with irrational people who obviously have pyschological discomfort with electing a black man for president.
The MAJORITY of ALL Americans will elect Barack Obama as president and the rest of you will have each other to comfort.
Barack Obama WILL WIN!!! So please go somewhere else with your hatred remarks.
“The only thing to fear is fear…” FDR
That also go for you Republicans pretending to be Democrats.

Posted by: Dtruth4u | May 25, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

addendum: I personally didn’t vote for Reagan, I supported John Anderson’s third party run, and likewise Hillary’s supporters would support a moderate third party as well. Mccain is just the next best choice we have after Hillary.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

For those of you who care, new polls.
Gallup Tracking:
_____May 20-24 * May 19-23
Clinton 49 % * 49 %
McCain 44 * 45
Obama 45 % * 45 %
McCain 47 * 46
Rasmussen Tracking:
_____May 21-24 * May 20-23
Clinton 47 % * 47 %
McCain 44 * 45
Obama 44 % * 44 %
McCain 46 * 46
Rasmussen: “McCain is viewed favorably by 50% of voters nationwide and unfavorably by 46%. Obama’s numbers are 47% favorable and 50% unfavorable Opinions about Obama remain stronger. The likely Democratic nominee is viewed Very Favorably by 26% of voters and Very Unfavorably by 34%. For McCain, the numbers are 19% Very Favorable and 23% Very Unfavorable.”

Posted by: Brent | May 25, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

democratforMcCain – ah, but Senator Obama is the closest this country has come into finding another leader like JFK since the 60′s. Unlike you, I truly believe JFK would have supported Senator Obama – they were and are cut from the same cloth. And as far as Teddy goes, he has done many positive things for this country. Trying to knock Teddy down when he has such a horrific battle ahead of him is very insensitive. Get your emotions under control and lay off personal attacks and stick to the issues.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Silly, silly folks. What do you think the Repulicans will do with Hillary. They will eat her up!! Are you ready for pictures of Monica Lewisky and the ex president all of the TV, or many of the many other scandelous events that have occured with his polictical career. Obama, it our only hope!!!

Posted by: Sharon | May 25, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I guess many of you make believe Democrats are making threats to go Republican. PLEASE GO TODAY!!!
Why wait? Oh, you do not have enough intelligence to realize the Clinton has lost the race in every way possible.
If you go now, the debate can be real Democrats against real republicans. Than again, the Republicans probably don’t want you either…

Posted by: Dtruth4u | May 25, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Yeah, that is exactly what someone should do, listen to Carter one of the worst Presidents in our history.

Posted by: quickphil1943 | May 25, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

sandy wrote: “Trying to knock Teddy down when he has such a horrific battle ahead of him is very insensitive.”
I wholeheartedly agree with that.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

democratforMcCain – I do not have to read through JFK’s history – I lived through it. He was a marvelous leader and I see those same qualities in Senator Obama.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

democratforMcCain There is no such thing as a democrat for McCain. You can be a former democrat for McCain but when you decide to vote republican you have in fact become one. simple enough to understand?

Posted by: micmacarac | May 25, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Brent – saw those same figures myself today. However, I do not feel they have much validity at this point until the Democratic party has one candidate. The polls fluctuate so much right now – I believe it will settle down once there are only two candidates in the running.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

“Carter was hinting that he was a supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, as far back as April.”
Given Carter’s success, or lack thereof, in the White House, this ought to be the kiss of death for Obama.

Posted by: creeper | May 25, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

rd,
I think so. History will be repeated if DNC doesn’t want to listen people’s wills. What is the purpose of superdelegates? To prevent a candidate who looks good in the surface but has no chance to wrap up the election in November! They should take a second look on Hillary, the one who has been beaten up by the media relentlessly but refuses to give up. Compared to Obama, Hillary is a true fighter!

Posted by: Tolkien | May 25, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

BRENT: You are hopeless….
These are the numbers that really matter!!!!!!
THAT MEANS A MAJORITY! GET IT?
Barack Obama
Pledged:1,660
Superdelegates 309
Total:1,969
Hillary Clinton
Pledged:1,500
Superdelegates 279
Total:1,779
Election Center » Needed to Win: 2,026

Posted by: Dtruth4u | May 25, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

democratforMcCain – you are obviously a person with no heart or feelings – interacting with bloggers like you do a disservice to myself as well as to other bloggers who wish to engage in constructive dialog and not destructive personality bashing. You are truly a lost soul…..

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Time to take my leave – there were some intelligent bloggers here but the conversations have degrated into bashing each other’s candidates. This election is the most important election in my life time. Idiotic, unfeeling posts have no place in the election process.

Posted by: sandy | May 25, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Obama has long association with enemies of America and terrorist and now he wants to rename America has ” Obama’s won States of America as against the real name United States of America” . He wants Florida and Michigan to break away from America. We know you Mr Obama , you want to split up and divide this country but you wont succeed although you have tried doing it by separating whites from blacks , women from men, rich from poor . Obama you are not our nominee

Posted by: Demcrats for McCain | May 25, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Who is he to tell Hillary to leave the race before there is a nominee? Superdelegates don’t vote until the convention! We won’t have a nominee by June 3rd.

Posted by: Karen | May 25, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Hillary i voted for in NY because I wanted to see a female president but your lies and miss-speaks and then Terry blaming them on Obama has swayed me to think you are not the right person for the job if you will lie to us who support you what kind of president would you be ? A woman yes soon I hope but Obama now has my vote he has been honest and kind to you while you have attacked him unjustly..
Hillary I am not stupid the popular vote lie you have feed us who support you is the last straw….
The truth of the popular vote :
Popular Vote Total 16,685,941 49.1% 16,227,514 47.7% Obama +458,427 +1.4%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,020,025 49.1% 16,451,376 47.5% Obama +568,649 +1.6%
Popular Vote (w/FL) 17,262,155 48.3% 17,098,500 47.8% Obama +163,655 +0.5%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,596,239 48.3% 17,322,362 47.6% Obama +273,877 +0.7%

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Who cares about Jimmy Carter?

Posted by: Joan | May 25, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

That’s the problem with Jimmy Carter; that is, he gives up too easy.
I remember when Jimmy Carter conceded early on in the 1980 presidential election when the polls were still open in the Pacific states.
As a result, more Democratic candidates lost, since a lot of Democratic voters decided to stay home because Jimmy Carter gave up early.
Jimmy Carter has the reputation of being a weak president, which is why Americans voted for Reagan, who was perceived by millions of Democrats as being stronger.
Jimmy Carter is only reminding Americans about how quickly he gives up.

Posted by: USmarine0331 | May 25, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

I have the utmost respect for former President Jimmy Carter, but I believe he should back off his attempts to get Clinton to drop out. If Obama doesn’t have the magic number of delegates after the primaries have concluded, then Clinton ought to stay in all the way to the Convention. In several blogs I’ve read recently, links have been inserted to reports of Obama’s involvement in Chicago activities not heretofore investigated nor reported to the public. (See I’m sure the Obama/Dean/Axelrod machine will have a spin for all reports that implicate Obama, but I have a gut instinct of an Obama coverup–the same feeling I had about a Bush. I’m a Clinton supporter and will not be voting for Obama anyway. But, I’ve always believed where there is smoke, there is usually a fire. Unfortunately, I would get no pleasure out of saying “I told you so,” should the conflagration raise its ugly head AFTER the Democratic Convention.

Posted by: kerry | May 25, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

For the people who are calling for Hillary Democrats to leave the party, we already have. Huge proportions of us have already switched our nomination to Independent and sent our letters and voter registration cards to Howard Dean. More will follow in the coming weeks. Its called Operation Independent. You fail to realize we are the base of this party, we are the ones that have carried the party for decades. Now try to win without us. You and Brazille want us to stay home and not vote at all. We will not. We will turn out in droves with the express purpose of defeating Barack Obama, and getting his mouthpieces out of the DNC. The Obama wing will not succeed in hijacking our party and replacing us “old dinosaurs” with your new wealthy left wing extremmist. Common sense used to be prevalent in the Democratic Party. All the common sense seems to have left the party with the rise of Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama. Its time to reclaim it.

Posted by: jdona | May 25, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Once again – ANOTHER OLD MALE PARTY LEADER – telling the woman what to do!!!
Hillary – take it to the convention.

Posted by: kerry | May 25, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

I voted for Hillary in NY because I wanted to see a female president but her lies and miss-speaks and then Terry blaming them on Obama has swayed me to think she is not the right person for the job if she will lie to us who support her what kind of president would she be ?
A woman yes soon I hope but Obama now has my vote he has been honest and kind to you while she has attacked him unjustly..
Hillary I am not stupid the popular vote lie you have feed us who support you is the last straw….
The truth of the popular vote :
Popular Vote Total 16,685,941 49.1% 16,227,514 47.7% Obama +458,427 +1.4%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,020,025 49.1% 16,451,376 47.5% Obama +568,649 +1.6%
Popular Vote (w/FL) 17,262,155 48.3% 17,098,500 47.8% Obama +163,655 +0.5%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,596,239 48.3% 17,322,362 47.6% Obama +273,877 +0.7%
Obama leads in them all! She lies and makes all her supporter look stupid!
SHAME ON YOU HILLARY SHAME ON YOU!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

PRESIDENT CARTER, AM I SURPRISED AT YOU – TELLING HILLARY TO GIVE IT UP AND THE SUPER DELEGATES TO MAKE THEIR DECISION ON JUN 3. THAT IS THE MOST STUPID REMARK COMING FROM A PERSON OF YOU SATATUTE I”VE EVER HEARD. YOU MUST BE FOR OBAMA. IF YOU ARE, YOU NEED TO KEEP THESE THOUGHTS TO YOURSELF OR ENDORSE HIM. SHE HAS EVERY RIGHT IF SHE IS THE WINNER OF THE POPULAR VOTE TO TAKE IT TO THE FLOOR OF THE DEMOCRAT CONVENTION. THEN IF THE DEAN & PELOSI LED DEMOCRATS SHUT HER DOWN IT WILL BE THESE UNEDUCATED FOLKS THAT WILL GO DOWN WHEN THEIR ELECTION COME UP. NO WAY DOES AMERICA WANT OR NEED THE LIKES OF SOMEONE AS DECEITFUL AS OBAMA. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON YOU MR. EX-PRESIDENT AND TO THINK I VOTED FOR YOU.

Posted by: kerry | May 25, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Hillary Take it All The way To The Convention . We Are Behind You .
Obama , Like his Campaign Are Sinster , And Under Handed !!! . They Can’t Be Trusted !!! . America Needs A Strong Pro – American President !!!
HILLARY Or , John McCain 2008

Posted by: kerry | May 25, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

I respect Hillary for being a fighter.
Carter gives up too easy.
We need a fighter as Commander-in-Chief.
Obama acts like he is sensitive and too soft.
Since Obama gets offended too easily, why would Americans want a whiner as president?

Posted by: USmarine0331 | May 25, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

If Rezco is found guilty, the media will be falling all over themselves to get that story. Enough of them allow the spotlight to trump politics that it will be out there.
The Banshee will use it as a sword of Damocles hanging over BO’s head. She will lobby the SD’s like there is no tomorrow, trying to convince them that Rezco is a live grenade.

Posted by: kerry | May 25, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

As a state senator, Barack Obama wrote letters to city and state officials supporting his political patron Tony Rezko’s successful bid to get more than $14 million from taxpayers to build apartments for senior citizens.
The deal included $855,000 in development fees for Rezko and his partner, Allison S. Davis, Obama’s former boss, according to records from the project, which was four blocks outside Obama’s state Senate district.

Posted by: kerry | May 25, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

I’m sure the SDs have a major story on Obama.
Everyone knows he is NOT qualified – and I think she is going ALL the way to the convention.
We will all be surprised – but – this is FAR FROM OVER!!!! so SADDLE UP!

Posted by: kerry | May 25, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

rev wright is going to be vice president

Posted by: kerry | May 25, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Why does everybody think Obama is to the Left of Hillary? Have you ever looked up his Senate voting record? It’s the same as Hillary’s. But the media call Hillary a “moderate” and Obama a “liberal.”
Do you think the corportate media would ever let a liberal get this far in the process? If Obama were really a liberal they would have ignored him like they ignored John Edwards and Dennis Kucinich.
Why do people even listen to the media? They’re liars.

Posted by: Karen | May 25, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

USmarine0331,
Why whould America want a woman that lies to them as their President ?
Do you believe Hillary Clinton is leading in the popular vote ?
You call Obama a whiner what has he been whiny about ?
If you really are a marine why would you want a president that calls troop liars when the say she wasnt under sniper fire ?
Not for Hillary anymore EYES WIDE OPEN !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Karen
They’re not even close. Obama is so far to the left, he’s almost off the map!

Posted by: T | May 25, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

kerry,
Google Hillary Clintons church “the family” will she make then vice president ?

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Obama is supported by the losing democratic nominees for the last 40 years–need I say more?

Posted by: virginia | May 25, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

karen wrote: “It’s the same as Hillary’s.”
It’s obviously not the same, for one thing he skipped out on the Iran vote. For that matter, he skipped out on most votes after barely getting into the Senate and then running for President.
He has little record, was determined to be the most liberal senator, and his political career associations are with Marxists, Muslims, and Syrian-Iraqi corruption kings, his political mentors.
Not to mention GD America Wright and Farrakan Black Liberation Theology, which believe it or not some people consider left of mainstream.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 25, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Karen,
I agree with you. She is more liberal. In US Senate she voted against Bush/Chenney energy bill, against transferring class actions lawsuits to federal courts, against decreasing punitive damages in medical malpractice lawsuits while he was pro.

Posted by: magda | May 25, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

magda
You should stop reading the Inquirer!

Posted by: T | May 25, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

wOW you Hillary supporters are just like Hillary..no wonder!
Hillary is making a bad name for women. I would be the first person to vote for a women president…but the right woman president and she is not the one. She makes ALL women…well, uneducated white women, I mean…look crazy, emotionally unstable, manipulative, decietful and frankly, not fit to ever hold a status so high as being president. She is pushing the womens movement backwards not forwards! But the uneducated white ppl just aren’t smart enough to make an educated decision and vote for the person who has consistently showed us great leadership skill, excellent fundraising ability, the ability to avoid distractions from the things that matter, the ability to avoid tearing up Hillary’s reputation like she attempts to do to him for the purpose of votes, and the ability to stay emotionaly balanced, calm, cool and collected throughout this whole crazy campaign. He is obviously fit to be president and he will and he will fix America and all you sorry ppl who ever voted against him will fill like garabage….just like you do now for voting for Bush. That’s how it will go..
So, get with the program!
Also, look at it this way.. if Barck Obama was a woman, and if he was white…he would be the president already. So, forget what he looks like, and make the right vote and save this country!

Posted by: Jena Smith | May 25, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Jena Smith
Are you really Willie Nelson?

Posted by: T | May 25, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

democratforMcCain,
If you really didnt know like i didnt then please see bellow the truth if you did know then even you know you are lying and no wonder you like Clinton she lies like you!
Obamas 11+ years :
Obama was elected to the Illinois Senate in 1996, Obama was reelected to the Illinois Senate in 1998, and again in 2002 he held office till he was elected to the United States Senate in 2004 which he still holds
He and Hillary are both junior senators!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Why should she give it up?? She has the right to be there just as Obama does. And it says alot that she is still in the fight and doesn’t let critizism from others be in the way of her dream. And obviously she is still in the competition since so many people has voted for her. She has overcome so many obstacles, and NOONE has the right to say that she should give up…thats a decision the citizens should make. Thats why we VOTE, and just because you dont agree with her…doesnt mean she has to give up. Just dont vote for her and thats it.
God bless you all.

Posted by: US Voter | May 25, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

T,
US Senate pages not the Inquirer.
I like that sen. Clinton voted in those 3 cases pro people!

Posted by: magda | May 25, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

NO democart is for McCain..
McCain is George Bush’s third term he lies about his war history his pow codename was song bird he made propaganda statements for the enemy..
He gave up US locations google vietnamvets against mccain they have the radio recordings the transcript and Freedom of Information papers to prove all of it!
John McCain even adimits it in part in his book.
John McCain will take away a woman right to choose!
No democrat will be for him!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

“In numerous conversations, friends of both Clintons expressed a preference for Hillary, upending the public perception that Bill is the warmer and more likable of the two. He talks; she listens, with a talent for banter that can be disarming and even whimsical. Shortly after Lissa Muscatine, a close adviser of Hillary Clinton’s, went to work as a White House speechwriter, in 1993, she tried to catch the First Lady’s attention as Clinton was hurrying along a corridor. “Stop—stop!” Muscatine called out. Clinton wheeled around. “Stop! in the name of love,” she sang out, breaking into a boogie in the West Wing hallway. Clinton’s aides are famously loyal, staying with her far longer than most staffs at the highest level of politics.”
—George Packer, The New Yorker
—newyorker 1/28/2008

Posted by: Brent | May 25, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

democratforMcCain,
YOU WROTE:Kate ))))))))))))))being a community leader is not public office sorry, and Obama will not be the next president, are the one after, and I see you are a typical obama follower a name caller, a down grader someone who has to resort to bashing a person to feel like a real person, well go ahead if it makes you feel good,
I REPLIED:
If you really didnt know like i didnt then please see bellow the truth if you did know then even you know you are lying and no wonder you like Clinton she lies like you!
Obamas 11+ years :
Obama was elected to the Illinois Senate in 1996, Obama was reelected to the Illinois Senate in 1998, and again in 2002 he held office till he was elected to the United States Senate in 2004 which he still holds
He and Hillary are both junior senators!
YET YOU STILL WONT ADMIT YOU WHERE WRONG WHO IS THE CON MAN ?
HONESTY MATTERS !!!
NOT FOR CLINTON NO MORE ! I MIGHT BE POOR BUT IM NOT STUPID! WHITE WOMAN FOR OBAMA

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Brent,
If they are so loyal why are they all leaving her now ? Patty Doyle is joining Obama her fundraising team is joing obama her mexican co chair has just joined Obama.
If you want to vote for McCain thats your right go for it..
Obama will be the nominee and the president !
TRUTH MATTERS !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Brent,
You WROTE:
This is why even millions of strangers like me whom Hillary does not know personally but WHO seems to know HER will stand with her all the way. She is human. We WON”T vote for a Messiah who does NOT EVEN acknowledge he IS human.
What a load Hillary has made all her suporters look stupid she told us she leads in the popular vote she doesnt ! She told us she will FL and Michigan dont count then told us they do when she needed it!
She told us she was under sniper fire we believed her she called the airforce guy a lair or mistaken when he said there was no sniper fire.
When Obama makes a mistake he said I made a gaffe I messed up…Its not the first time it wont be the last.. Thats real thats human!
TRUTH MATERS

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

President Carter, I was a Carter Delegate in 1980. You have disappointed me beyond belief with your blantant remarks against Hillary Clinton in this campaign. You and Rosalin should be thrilled to be supporting a former First Lady and a member of your exclusive Former President’s Club. However, I remember you and Gerald Ford turned out to be best friends. We all know what President Ford wrote about Bill Clinton, but did not want those thoughts publicized until after his death. Is that the same with you? How terrible that you would let personal bias keep you from supporting the obvious best candidate here. You are part of the Democratic Party that has disillusioned me beyond belief. This whole cult-like movement of Obama is the most sinister and scary thing I’ve ever watched. It’s like even those of you who SHOULD know better are just as blinded as the college kids who have burned up the internet to get him where he is. Perhaps he IS the Anti-Christ – it is my understanding that is how the AC will be viewed. And I haven’t even believed in that before now.

Posted by: FranSC | May 25, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

FranSC: Most of the Cult movements, Polygamists amd the Hate groups in this country belong to the white race and they did and are doing the most damage.
You cannot say that the young and old followers of Obama is a Cultist group because they are looking for change in this Country and not more of the same, with McCain or a Hillary Clinton Presidency.

Posted by: Lookup | May 25, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

FranSC: Most of the Cult movements, Polygamists and the Hate groups in this country belong to the white race and they did and are doing the most damage.
You cannot say that the young and old followers of Obama is a Cultist group because they are looking for change in this Country and not more of the same, with McCain or a Hillary Clinton Presidency.

Posted by: Lookup | May 25, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

HillaryMcCain08,
No one is trying to force hillary to quit! Thats her spin its not real !
Obama has said she can stay in it as long as she wants….
What people take offence to all her lies and bs..
She is not winning in the popular vote!
People would love to see hillary stay in the race and critice john mccain but all she does is racebait and lie…
She lied to me and I have had enough of her.. Its time for the future its time for Obama!
Hillary supporter no more.

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

“United We stand, Divided We Fall” Obama is uniting people while Hillary is trying to divide it!

Posted by: Demo Rules | May 25, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Hillary Clinton lost my support when she threw her hat into the presidential race, and since then every ounce of considerable respect that I once had for her and Bill has been lost forever.
Hillary may indeed have a constitutional right to run for president, but she is way off base morally and ethically in aspiring to the office in my book.
Hillary would have us believe that she was more or less sharing presidential duties with Bill during his tenure ..okay, if we accept that doesn’t that mean that both she and Bill have served the constitutionally limited time as president.
The country doesn’t need or deserve a (Constitutionally flaunted) third Clinton term anymore than it deserves a third Bush term.
This “dynastic” issue was the first thing that unsettled me early in the campaign, and then the issue was a moot point with me as I listened to and watched Mr Obama, finding in him an intelligent, visionary, admirable and likeable candidate that, in my opinion, doesn’t come along very often in any century.
While the Clintons have proved themselves as leaders, their appalling campaign tactics show just how ugly and distrustful naked ambition is.
I supported them during their last tawdry years in the White House, but looking back I feel that I gave them too much of the benefit of the doubt.
The Clintons will say and do anything to get back into the White House, and it’s been appalling watching them this year in their efforts to change goalposts, pass lies off as “misspeaking”,set themselves up as champions of disenfranchised voters (if Barack had been on the Michigan ballot and had campaigned there as well as in Florida and won, would the clintons be clamoring to seat the delegates?. I think not).
IFortunately we have Barack Obama, and asuch, the Clintons hopefully will justg go away after June 3 (earlier if ppossible please).
I am a 64-year-old white female lifelong Democrat who takes further offense at Hillary’s complaints of gender bias in this election. It is a cheap, cheap shot on many levels. Not the least being the implication that it is more important to break gender barriers than racial barriers.
Will Hillary Peron stop at nothing!!!!!!
m ruzza,NYC

Posted by: m ruzza | May 25, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

The Time for Change Is Now! Obama For President!

Posted by: Demo Rules | May 25, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

m ruzza,
Im a 28 year old white woman who was on the wrong team but now agrees with you 100% : )
A woman for president one day soon yes!
Hillary Clinton for president no never !
No drama Obama 08 12
GO AWAY HILLARY WRITE SOME BOOKS AND PUT YOUR LIES TO GOOD USE!
TAKING A KIDS BIKE AND VIDEO GAMES WHEN YOU HAVE $120 million is discusting !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I don’t agree with Carter. He was a weak one-term president. This process is about choosing the best candidate, and I think Hillary is the best chance we have at the White House. She has every reason and every right to stay in.

Posted by: Mike | May 25, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Carter is nothing but an old fart that needs to go back to selling his peanuts.

Posted by: LADNARC | May 25, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Obama is divisive, deceiving, extremist and unelectable. I like Jimmy Carter as ex-President, not as president. AA are blackmailing the DNC with riots and insurrection, but superdelegates should not be affraid. Most Democrats support Hillary Clinton. if Obama is rhe nominee, then McCain wins the White House. Democrats won’t vote for Obama.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Carter needs to shut up and go back to his peanut farm. If Hillary doesn’t get it, I’m voting for McCain and I’m not changing my mind. Everyone I know feels the same way. Obama is a loser.

Posted by: Nancy | May 25, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Print E-mail May 25, 2008
Gallup Daily: Clinton Maintains Lead Over McCainObama has 5-point lead over HIllary Clinton can defeat McCain, Obama can not. “Gallup Poll Daily tracking from May 20-24 finds Hillary Clinton maintaining a significant 49% to 44% lead over John McCain when registered voters are asked about their preferences for the fall general election, while McCain has a slight 47% to 45% advantage over Barack Obama.”

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Nancy,
You have just been busted!
Y
ou have always been for John McCain even when Clinton was winning telling Obama supporters to vote for McCain!
hahaha you have been caught !
NO woman will vote for McCain and give up her right to choose!
Nancy vote for who ever you want but dont lie to us !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

No we won’t vote for Obama. With Obama we can lose a lot more than women their right to choose. Write Hillary on the ballot. No Obama.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Gallup Daily: Clinton Maintains Lead Over McCain NJ — Gallup Poll Daily tracking from May 20-24 finds Hillary Clinton maintaining a significant 49% to 44% lead over John McCain when registered voters are asked about their preferences for the fall general election, while McCain has a slight 47% to 45% advantage over Barack Obama.
Hillary can beat McCain. Obama can not

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Newsweek Poll
Dems: Obama 50, Clinton 42
General: Obama 48, McCain 46
General: Clinton 48, McCain 44
There are lots of polls this was the first i could find !
Ill find you more !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Democrats want to win the fall election, not the milestone of an AA nominee. To win the White House back we need Hillary Clinton. With barack McCain will win.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Hillary is a Dictator, if she was President people would come for us in the middle of the night!We would have more Stupid Laws like the Seat Belt Law, which is against our Constitutional Right!

Posted by: Demo Rules | May 25, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Tapper can manipulate Carter’s words any way he wants. Hints of endorsement is not an endorsement and President Carter has not given his endorsement to barack yet.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Kate even in the poll you found Hillary has more chance to beat McCain

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Real clear politics
Obama against mccain
05/11 – 05/24 — 46.9 44.1 Obama +2.8

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Hillary is a Republican implant, The Republicans want Hillary to win cause, because she is for them.Did ya forget Hillary praised McCain just a few months ago on National T.V.

Posted by: Demo Rules | May 25, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

What is wrong with praising McCain? McCain praised obama. Does that mean that barack is republican? barack praised reagan and nixon, is he a republican in the closet or in the closet anyway?

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

libre,
Yes it does they are both 48% but there is one problem with that Hillary cant win the nomination she has lost it will be over soon Obama only needs 52 delegates and its over.
Hillary is lying to turn people against obama !
I was for Hillary but she is a disgrace she really thinks if it cant be her then America must suffer John McCain !
That’s a disgrace !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Kate still Hillary Clinton beats McCain for a margin of more than five in that poll

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Obama is UNELECTABLE. if he wins the nomination write Hillary on the ballot. Real Democrats won’t vote for obama.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Demorules. Hillary Clinton a republican implant after 30 year of working for the Democrats in this country? Obama the unknown may be a foreign country implant.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

libre
google vietnam vets against john mccain she why he cant lead america and if you closet line was about that sincalar guy you may want to google hillary and Huma Abedin.

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Graceful exits are great politicians and actors. Hillary is a mediocre person with a mediocre brain and subprime values. Expecting her to make a graceful exit like expecting George Bush to recite a soliloquy. It just isn’t in them.

Posted by: DrRay | May 25, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Kate if Hillary can not win the nomination then McCain will be president. But you are forgeting the DNC Convention and the superdelegates and the popular votes. No matter how many delegates Obama won, it will not be the 2025, so it will be decided by superdelegates based on electability. Obama is unelectable.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

hillary Clinton started her political career as a republican for Goldwater who was aginst civil rights.. she only became a democrat because she married bill clinton… A real feminist hey ?
Obama was born in the USA..
John McCain was not born in the USA if he was to win the election it would be opened for a court challange !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

If the hierarchy at the DNC wants to purpossely lose the White House and nominate obama. Democrtas won’t vote for him. we will write Hillary on the ballots.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

wOW you Hillary supporters are just like Hillary..no wonder!
Hillary is making a bad name for women. I would be the first person to vote for a women president…but the right woman president and she is not the one. She makes ALL women…well, uneducated white women, I mean…look crazy, emotionally unstable, manipulative, decietful and frankly, not fit to ever hold a status so high as being president. She is pushing the womens movement backwards not forwards! But the uneducated white ppl just aren’t smart enough to make an educated decision and vote for the person who has consistently showed us great leadership skill, excellent fundraising ability, the ability to avoid distractions from the things that matter, the ability to avoid tearing up Hillary’s reputation like she attempts to do to him for the purpose of votes, and the ability to stay emotionaly balanced, calm, cool and collected throughout this whole crazy campaign. He is obviously fit to be president and he will and he will fix America and all you sorry ppl who ever voted against him will fill like garabage….just like you do now for voting for Bush. That’s how it will go..
So, get with the program!
Also, look at it this way.. if Barck Obama was a woman, and if he was white…he would be the president already. So, forget what he looks like, and make the right vote and save this country!

Posted by: Jena Smith | May 25, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Man with all this hate amongst democrats and dissatisfaction amongst republicans maybe somebody else outside could surprise. I would love to see a debate between Nader and Paul. At least we would see some integrity. I don’t know what to believe from the top three.

Posted by: Ya baby | May 25, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Go ahead and ignore the wishes of Florida, Michigan, and 49% of the rest of the Democratic Party Mr. Obama. I’ll be voting against you in November Sir.

Posted by: Tom H. | May 25, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

if Barck Obama was a woman, and if he was white…he wouldn’t be even on the Senate. So, forget what he looks like, and think that he has no substance. Vote for Hillary and save this country!

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Kate, John McCain is a patriotic American since his birth. He has fought for the country and he suffered torture in Vietnam. He represents experience and acumen accumulated over a long period. What does Barrack Obama offer? Change. What kind of change? He does not answer. He did not vote properly in the Senate. He needs to grow up and show he can make decisions and handle responsibilities. I am a Democrat but when it comes to judging between John McCain and Barrack Obama, I am first American and as a voter I feel John will make a better President than Obama. If Hillary does not make it, I will have it to vote for John. Sorry Obama and your supporters.

Posted by: Krishna Baru | May 25, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Libre,
You wrote:
Kate if Hillary can not win the nomination then McCain will be president. But you are forgeting the DNC Convention and the superdelegates and the popular votes. No matter how many delegates Obama won, it will not be the 2025, so it will be decided by superdelegates based on electability. Obama is unelectable.
All polls show Obama would still win if he is unelectable the polls dont know it yet!
Popular vote truth:
Popular Vote Total
16,685,941 49.1% 16,227,514 47.7% Obama +458,427 +1.4%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,020,025 49.1% 16,451,376 47.5% Obama +568,649 +1.6%
Popular Vote (w/FL) 17,262,155 48.3% 17,098,500 47.8% Obama +163,655 +0.5%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,596,239 48.3% 17,322,362 47.6% Obama +273,877 +0.7%
CAN OBAMA WIN THE BIG STATES:
National Obama +2.8 Clinton +1.5
Pennsylvania Obama +5.8 Clinton +11.7
Ohio Obama +1.3 Clinton +8.3
Wisconsin Obama +1.6 McCain +3.4
Virginia McCain +1.3 McCain +10.4
Florida McCain +8.3 Clinton +3.0
California Obama +11.5 Clinton +11.3
Total Delegates 1970 – 1780 Obama + 190
He needs 52 delegates to finish this race !
Real clear politics is the source

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Libre wrote: “What is wrong with praising McCain? McCain praised obama. Does that mean that barack is republican? barack praised reagan and nixon, is he a republican in the closet or in the closet anyway?”
Who know? One day, watching one hour of Mr. Obama speech in C-Span, I thought he is a Republican because he criticized more of Clinton’s policy than GOP incumbent

Posted by: stock_craft | May 25, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Kate Senator Clinton already won the primaries on the states with more popular vote and that in the general election will carry more electoral votes. Yes Obama may win the democrat nomination, but Democrats won’t vote for him in the General Election, that is the reason he is unelectable. There are many websites funded by obama’s big oil bundlers, that does not make them accurate or honest.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Krishna Baru,
You asked change to what ?
The US contitutuon says to be President, not only must you be a citizen, but you must also be natural-born. … U.S. nationals who become citizens are not considered natural-born. … John McCain wasnt born in the USA so he will face a court challange and most likley lose!
John McCain isnt a war hero google veitnam vet against john mccain !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Kate, you made a comment that John Mccain was not born in America. Please read the following
McCain was born at Coco Solo Naval Air Station[2] in Panama to naval officer John S. McCain, Jr. (1911–1981) and Roberta (Wright) McCain (b. 1912). At that time, the Panama Canal was under American control, and the McCain family was stationed in the Panama Canal Zone.

Posted by: Kris | May 25, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Libre,
Please see current polling which shows Obama will win the state Clinton won in the general election!
Popular vote truth:
Popular Vote Total
16,685,941 49.1% 16,227,514 47.7% Obama +458,427 +1.4%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,020,025 49.1% 16,451,376 47.5% Obama +568,649 +1.6%
Popular Vote (w/FL) 17,262,155 48.3% 17,098,500 47.8% Obama +163,655 +0.5%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,596,239 48.3% 17,322,362 47.6% Obama +273,877 +0.7%
CAN OBAMA WIN THE BIG STATES:
National Obama +2.8 Clinton +1.5
Pennsylvania Obama +5.8 Clinton +11.7
Ohio Obama +1.3 Clinton +8.3
Wisconsin Obama +1.6 McCain +3.4
Virginia McCain +1.3 McCain +10.4
Florida McCain +8.3 Clinton +3.0
California Obama +11.5 Clinton +11.3
Total Delegates 1970 – 1780 Obama + 190
He needs 52 delegates to finish this race !
Real clear politics is the source

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Jimmy, not Hillary, should give it up and go back to hammering nails into habitat housing. He’s good at that,(and I admire his civic actions),but he is, and always has been, a lousy politician.
Jimmy,Obama will NOT win in November. All his shortcomings will get well and truly aired on TV in the coming months. We might, God willing, even see an indictment coming down the pike in connection with his disgraceful participation in the Rezko scandal(s). I, for one, will vote for McCain to avoid seeing Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, et al, dropping by the White House on a regular basis. Re potential first lady Michelle: I see that kind of attitude on a weekly basis in Department stores, etc; I don’t want to see it when I turn on my TV as well.

Posted by: Marty | May 25, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

KAte google anything you want. you can find thousands of websites against anyone you want. Maybe you should turn off your computer sometimes and go ut and listen to people, read or learn something. google Wright, google Rezko, google Blackwell, google Hamas,google Michelle. google anything…

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Under American control does not make it US teritory if it did people born in France or Germany durring the war would be able to become the President of the USA.. Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger was born in Austria durring the war when it was under USA control he would be aloud to be President if that was true he cant because of Article Two of the United States Constitution.
FACTS ARE FACTS!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Kate you are quoting polls put out by Obama’s sources. That is okay, you can believe in “change” if you want. but obama is unelectable and won’t have the support of real Democrats. He won’t have the Florida and Michigan vote, the bitter blue collar vote, the rural vote or the Hispanic vote. He is unelectable

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Kate the Panama Canal was US territory unfortunatly, so it is not the same as an occupation. at least McCain parents were both Americans, Barack’s were not. Anyway. no Obama, no McCain. Write Hillary on the ballot.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

libre,
They have freedom of information document to prove John Mccain gave up USA locations they have his statement and propganda recordings which prove his actions.
In his own statements which are there he said his arms were damaged when he punched out the Jet not from his treatment like he tells us now! His code name was SONG BIRD because hee talked and gave up information and made propaganda radio broadcasts he admits to some of it in his book.
PS I have googled all those other things I was first for Hillary until I got into an argument and found out Hillary had been lying to me !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

KAte. I was for Obama until I found out he is been lying to everybody.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Panama Canal was NOT US territory Please read the Constitution. It was under US administration

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Libre,
You wrote:
KAte. I was for Obama until I found out he is been lying to everybody.
How has he lied to us all ?
Please explain ?

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Kate “I was first for Hillary until I got into an argument and found out Hillary had been lying to me !
explain, how has she lied to you?

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Kate there is nothing in the constitution about Panama.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Libre,
You wrote:
Kate you are quoting polls put out by Obama’s sources. That is okay, you can believe in “change” if you want. but obama is unelectable and won’t have the support of real Democrats. He won’t have the Florida and Michigan vote, the bitter blue collar vote, the rural vote or the Hispanic vote. He is unelectable
DONT BE SILLY :
The polls are from real clear politics not from Obama its the truth. He will be our next president !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I didn’t realize how racist the Democratic party was until now. What ashame all this is. I this party dissolve.

Posted by: jeff | May 25, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Kate, “sweetie” real clear politics is not independent from Obama. Democrats won’t vote for Obama. You think barack went pandering to Florida because he is sure of getting the votes/ forget it Obama is unelectable.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

The Thomson-Urrutia Treaty was signed on April 20, 1921 between the United States and Colombia. Based on the terms of the agreement, the U.S. paid Colombia 25 m illion dollars in return for Colombia’s recognition of Panama’s independence.
The agreement never made it US territory!
Facts are Facts !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

jeff unfortunatly obama brought racial division to the party, I agree with you is unbelevable that African American are voting for Obama just for his race even though he has no substance. This racist attitude is making the Democrat party a mess and about to lose an election that was practically in the bag.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Kate is not Panama, is the Panama Canal zone. it is just like Guantanamo.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

MRUSA unfortunatly not. Obamacrats are not on the same side of Democrats. Write Hillary on the ballot.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

How has clinton lied:
She claims she has more expirence she doesnt:
Obama held public office for 11 years
Hillary for 6 years
Hillary says she has the poular vote she doesnt!
Hillary says she was against NFTA when her first lady records came out she was for it!
hillary says that Obama meet with the canadian embassy canada comes back and ivestergates it and it turns out it was her staff that told canada it was just political and dont believe she will change nafta.
She tells us Michigan and Fl wont count they broke the rules and then tells us they do count know because she is lossing and might I add is still lossing even with them counted !
Hillary tells us that Obama played the race card when Bill did and Bill did again.
Hillary says that they have been sexist against her.. Like being a woman is a bad thing and thats why she is losing.. If that was true why does she keep saying she is making history and keeps saying she is a woman vote for her make her the first ? More clinton lies:
Chelsea was jogging around the Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. (She was in bed watching it on TV.)
• Hillary was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. (She admitted she was wrong. He climbed Mt. Everest five years after her birth.)
• She was under sniper fire in Bosnia. (A girl presented her with flowers at the foot of the ramp.)
• She learned in The Wall Street Journal how to make a killing in the futures market. (It didn’t cover the market back then.)
Whoppers She Won’t Confess To
• She didn’t know about the FALN pardons.
• She didn’t know that her brothers were being paid to get pardons that Clinton granted.
• Taking the White House gifts was a clerical error.
• She didn’t know that her staff would fire the travel office staff after she told them to do so.
• She didn’t know that the Peter Paul fundraiser in Hollywood in 2000 cost $700,000 more than she reported it had.
• She opposed NAFTA at the time.
• She was instrumental in the Irish peace process.
• She urged Bill to intervene in Rwanda.
• She played a role in the ’90s economic recovery.
• The billing records showed up on their own.
• She thought Bill was innocent when the Monica scandal broke.
• She was always a Yankees fan.
• She had nothing to do with the New Square Hasidic pardons (after they voted for her 1,400-12 and she attended a meeting at the White House about the pardons).
• She negotiated for the release of refugees in Macedonia (who were released the day before she got there).

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

libre,
You sound like one of those right wing wacko’s. I am Black myself and never voted for as you call us African American politician any any race. If I voted for a white politician what’s that make me. If a majority have to vote to win any election or race, hince white is the majority in this country…does that make you a racist. How do you know they don’t feel he’s the best candidate! Barack is of mixed race…but you only see him as a African American. Take off the the African and just say he’s an American. I know you can’t picture that…Right.

Posted by: jeff | May 25, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

General comment to all the Clinton crazies who keep saying, “we” will vote for McCain if Obama is nominated, or that “democrats” will not vote for Obama.
You speak for no one but yourself. So please refrain from implying that you speak for all democrats or even those who voted for Clinton in the primaries. Your views are strickly your own (just as mind are) so don’t pretend you represent anyone else but yourself.

Posted by: RoyM | May 25, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

libre,
Kate is not Panama, is the Panama Canal zone. it is just like Guantanamo.
No its not you look like a fool.
The Thomson-Urrutia Treaty was signed on April 20, 1921 between the United States and Colombia. Based on the terms of the agreement, the U.S. paid Colombia 25 m illion dollars in return for Colombia’s recognition of Panama’s independence.
The agreement never made it US territory!
The Thomson-Urrutia Treaty was the treaty signed to make the panama canal get a history leason and stop pretending you are for Hillary when all you do is defend John mcbush mcsame..
If McCain did win the election he would losea court challange Article Two of the United States Constitution make McCain unelectable.

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Kate Did you find out all that in an argument. Obama has not 11 years in office, but 8, and he in those 8 years he has not completed more than 4 months of actual work. Obama lied about Rev. Wrights sermons and mounted a comedy of a break up lying to all Americans. He is still friens of Wright, Wright is still his mentor, Wright is still his pal and they still think alike. Obama sold political favors to millionaires in Illinois in exchange for campaign money, Obama sold a letter of recomendation to Rezko in exchange for campaign money and real estate. Obama laundered money through his law firm to hide the money he received from Blackwell in exchage for getting Illinois grants through Obama. etc, etc, etc.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Kate and that is what we know so far, we do not know how many more skeletons he has in the closet. On top of all he has a wife that hates AAmerica. How could she possibly be the first lady?

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Kate one thing is Panama’s independence and another the Panama Canal contract. The Panama’s independence was negotiated with Colombia, the contract to administa=rate and the limits of the Canal were negotiated with Panama, no Colombia.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I am not hiding anything . I am a democrat and as a Democrat I support Hillary nClinton. It is not a secret I have been posting on this blogs for months. What are you hiding? Mr Usa are you one of those Republicans pushing Obama so he can be easyly defeated by McCAin?

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

libre,
YOU TALK SO MUCH CRUD:
FACT CHECK !
Illinois Senate in 1996 Obama was reelected to the Illinois Senate in 1998, and again in 2002 then won the United States Senate election in Illinois, 2004
1996-2008 11+ years twelve in november!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Kate ok, what is the point if he never went to work.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

I could care less about Wright big deal my mums church hates gays my cousin is gay and my mum loves him but still goes to that church!
Hillarys shurch is “the family” the seem freaky John Mcsame sought the endorcment of hagee and that other wakko that said ugly things!
Maybe we should just denouce and reject religon!
All of them !
?????

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Kate Wright is not about religion it is about radicals antisocial individuals.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Kate Wright is not about religion, is about racism, hate and division, all brought by Obama to the primaries. so you don’t care but most Democrats do.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

libre,
YOU WROTE:
Kate ok, what is the point if he never went to work.
CAN YOU WRITE WITHOUT LYING ?
He passed a lot of bills for someone who “never went to work”….
Obama was elected to the Illinois Senate in 1996, succeeding State Senator Alice Palmer as Senator from the 13th District, which then spanned Chicago South Side neighborhoods from Hyde Park-Kenwood south to South Shore and west to Chicago Lawn.
Once elected, Obama gained bipartisan support for legislation reforming ethics and health care laws.
He sponsored a law increasing tax credits for low-income workers, negotiated welfare reform, and promoted increased subsidies for childcare.
Obama also led the passage of legislation mandating videotaping of homicide interrogations, and a law to monitor racial profiling by requiring police to record the race of drivers they detained.
He did quite a bit in just his first year… Imagane what he would have done if “he showed up”

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

For a person who only cares about herself, would not be surprised if she did not take her posse all the way to Denver, claiming ‘sex discrimination’ and her ‘entitlement’ to the job!

Posted by: jack | May 25, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

MrUsa. No Obama does not represent Democratic values. The fact that he copies most of Hillary’s policies does not make him like her.

Posted by: libre | May 25, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Right on MR USA this isnt a race about race its about the past vs the future…
Barack Obama will be our next president!
VOTE FOR THE MAN WHO TALKS ABOUT HOPE!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

MR USA COULD YOU CHANGE THAT TO:
“BAD REPUBLICANS” because lots of good republicans are voting for OBAMA!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Carter makes W look like FDR. During the Carter years if you wanted to buy a home the going interest rate was 18%.
As a Dem, I would be very tempted to tell a lie and claim Carter was better than W but the truth is W is better and that ain’t saying much.
Nice to hear from Jimmy, say Hi to Hamas.

Posted by: OhnoJimmy | May 25, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Thanks MR USA my next door neighbours will be happy now!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

libre where did you go ?

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

thanks to the person who gave the clinton supporters count to website.
i watched and read.
thanks again, it is very well done.
and makes a lot of sense.
once again thanks!

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

worldcitizen,
Hi what i the Clinton supporters count ?

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

I think the talking heads have proposed that fear always trumps hope and the Obama represent hope and McCain represents fear. And as one FDR once said – “the only thing to fear is fear itself” addendum 2008 – and John McCain.

Posted by: LAsux | May 25, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

There is not way Obama can become President!! NONE!! Obama, his campaign staffers, the media, the big mouths who are calling for Hillary to quit and treating her so badly have succeeded in turning millions of people away from the Democratic Party! The DNC, Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy, Carter are all in for the biggest shock of their lives! When the GE is over and McCain is elected President, you will all wonder how that could have happened! I will tell you how it happened…we found our voices, and we took back our country!! We have joined together to make our vote count…and it will…if not Hillary, then we will make sure it will be for McCain! You did your dirty work Obama and your supporters along with the aid of the media and the DNC…now it is our turn to let you know we have the power to overcome your travesties! Welcome to the new Voice of America! YES WE CAN!!!

Posted by: micha6888 | May 25, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

America can tolerate leaders that are centrists, or slightly on either side, but Obama is so far to the left. You don’t know because he hasn’t told you his plans. This guy is going to radically change America, America won’t like it, but he’ll say “but you voted for me, you should have known”….look out this guy is a radical with a socialist agenda. I’m not Bush fan, not a McCain fan, could take Hillary, but any of those are better than Obama. A radical that will finish the job and destroy America. Read his book. A racist dialogue on the scale of “Mein Kampf”. There are many parallels to 1933 Germany and Obama is the American Hitler.

Posted by: The Truth is Out There | May 25, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Who is this Jimmy? Anybody know? Last time I checked, he was a loser. I fondly remember voting for John Anderson simply because of him. As a democrat, I was repulsed by his four years. Now, I find myself supporting Hillary and knowing her opponent portends the same as buddy Jimmy.

Posted by: benvictor | May 25, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

personally I like obama more than clinton but the only reason that obama is going to beat clinton is because of the new emperor of the Democratic party, George Soros. He has diverted 100′s of millions of dollars to the democratic party, 527 groups like moveon.org, and other super liberal organizations that would not exist without his money.
This guy almost got Howard Dean the nomination in 2004 and has since put him in charge of the Democratic Party.

Posted by: john | May 25, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Mr. Jimmy Carter is too old to know what he is saying. Stay home and play cards.

Posted by: Tom | May 25, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Keep Fighting HILLARY!!!
We will NOT let them push you out!
Get out Hillary – YOU ARE GOING TO WIN
YOU get MILLIONS of VOTES
YOU are way up in the polls to beat both McCain & obama
YOU have the Electorial Map to win the General – obama does NOT
YOU are the reason the supers have not “Given” it to obama
YOU are QUALIFIED to be President of the USA – obama is NOT
YOU are the reason obama is desperate – had to resort to dirty political tricks like the LIE about RFK “Story” – Disgrace!
YOU HAVE THE POPULAR VOTE – The WIll of the People will Prevail
YOU WILL WIN!

Posted by: Molly | May 25, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Please Jimmy …. shut up. George W. Bush’s presidential legacy isn’t far below your own failed presidential legacy.

Posted by: David | May 25, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Kate: He was a state senator until he because a senator in 2004. There is a difference. Hillary didn’t have to be a state senator she was elected senator. Obama is is junior senator at this time. Get your facts straight and start reading politics.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 25, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Carter is an expert in failed policy and was the worst President of the 20th century. He’s the last person to tell anyone how to run their campaign.

Posted by: Pat | May 25, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Wow such strong comments.
No one wants to put down Hillary. She has done great things and is tough and a fighter. At some point though perhaps after the primaries she will need to decide what is in the best interest of the party. One can only be inspired and energized with Obama who will offer a clearly better choice over McCain. In a couple of weeks it will be time to unite and stop the negative comments.

Posted by: BOB | May 25, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Mariann Pepitone
Which part dont I know enough about ?
Obama leads Clinton 33 primaries to 18
Obama leads Clinton in pledged delegates
So the you theories of some supers delegats bribes has no facts to support it..
Obama needs only 51 deleagtes to win the nomination !
Your thing about the voting present thats how its done in the Illinois Senate you vote present until the bill is right of those 130 you mentioned which is really 126. On all those but 4 he later voted either for or against!
Your John McCain isnt legaly aloud to be President if he should by some fluke win we will all find that out !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Hillary supporters will NEVER vote for Obama so if you people think that come November we will unite behind the democratic party you are sooooo mistaken! The Democrat party is NOT a democratic entity…if it was then this travesty would not be happening! The DNC has no backbone and has treated Clinton with such disrespect and so has the media. The Obama campaign has done it’s dirty work behind the scenes to discredit Clinton and we will not forget that when we pull the lever for McCain..so get it out of your heads if you think we will be there for you in November…you aren’t for us now and we won’t be for you in November!! Count on it!!! Hillary or McCain!!!!

Posted by: micha6888 | May 25, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

john ,
FACT CHECK :
moveon.org WAS FOUNDERED TO SAVE THE CLINTONS
Learn about history before you try to rewite it !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Mariann Pepitone
Take away the super delegates and Barack Obama is still winning !
Your story make no sense if as you claim he did deals to win the super delegates then Clinton would be winning if you took them away right ?
take the super delegates away and clinton is still losing

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Kate: Where have you been? He doesn’t have the experence that McCain and Hillary have because they were in politics longer. He lost all the debates, he has to think before answering because he doesn’t know what to say and then sometimes he hesitates. And making stupid statements to the fact that he would sit down and talk to Hamas and Iran. Al Qaeda and Bin Laden will be dancing in the streets if he is elected planning their next attack because they know he’s a know nothing.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 25, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

micha6888,
I was a Hillary suporter I voted for here in NY I am voting for Barack Obama now!
You can vote for who ever you want!
Obama will win the nomination on sat and he will win the general in nov!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Kate: I don’t know where you learned your politics but you better go back to school. Hillary was leading Obama well over 100 superdelegates. If you take his supedelegates away and she still retained hers she would be leading in the superdelegates plus. But if he wins the nomination if she is smart she will declare herself as an independent and split the democrats which would be the best thing for this country. McCain would win. Good news and I am a democrat.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 25, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Without super delegates:
Obama has 1660 delegates
Clinton has 1460 delegates.
I dont care about Rev Wright micha6888
I dont care about people Revs or pastors.
Rev Wright helped the Clinton’s keep their marriage together. Funny how the dont tell their supporter that isnt it ?

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Mariann Pepitone
Obama has 1974 with 314.5 super Ds
Hillary has 1782 with 282.5 super Ds
They are the facts !

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Hillary should run as independent. Obama and McCain will fight with each other and ultimately, Hillary might be the President elect.
If the voters are split three major ways, Hillary will get more votes than Barack or McCain. She has the more solid supporters than those two. There will be many democrates and independents support Hillary.

Posted by: tigerjcs | May 25, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Mariann Pepitone,
Its to late for Hillary to run as an independent she would have had to file for Ballot access by Jan 2008.

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Who is Jimmy Carter? One of the worst President? Kissing HAMAS. Obama is just like another Jimmy Carter like. We can’t afford another Jimmy/Obama to lead this country. NO OBAMA!

Posted by: tigerjcs | May 25, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

THE HISTORY OF MOVEON.ORG
MoveOn started in 1998 as an email group, MoveOn.org, created by computer entrepreneurs Joan Blades and Wes Boyd, the married cofounders of Berkeley Systems. They started by passing around a petition asking Congress to “censure President Clinton and move on”, as opposed to impeaching him. The petition, passed around by word of mouth, was extremely successful; ultimately, they had half a million signatures.[citation needed] Buoyed by their success, the couple went on to start similar campaigns, including: calling for more arms inspections rather than an invasion of Iraq (see Popular opposition to war on Iraq); the reinstatement of lower limits on arsenic and mercury pollution, and campaign finance reform. Since then, it has raised millions of dollars for many Democratic candidates.

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

All Democrats need to leave the party, it is way to corrupted. There is no visible leadership it is all behind the scenes.
Clinton supporters please don’t write her name in the ballot, instead vote independent and don’t stay at home, don’t vote for Mr. McCain either he is what the media wants. Mrs. Clinton needs to run as an Independent because the DNC have decided not to have the best candidate to win. Their interest is no the best for this country, it’s how they can bring a lot of money to the DNC.

Posted by: alice newton | May 25, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

alice newton,
Why should every Clinton supporter vote independent ?
Democrats should vote for the democrat who wins the nomination!
I agree there has been poor leadership at the dnc it shouldnt have got so outa control…
Hillary Clinton shouldnt be alowed to change the rules when it suits her!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Hi Kate:
It appears you are raising a valid point in respect to John McCain’s birth. You are arguing that he was not born in U.S. How can we assume that the Republicans are not aware of this issue and have not developed sound defenses. Further, if Obama at his loss were to raise this issue and challenge McCain’s election, it will be a big public relations disaster. Both Republic and Democratic parties are aware of the circumstances surrounding John McCain’s birth so I doubt if this issue will be raised after Obama’s loss to McCain. Since John McCain’s father was in the U.S. Navy and John’s mom could have gone to the mainland for delivery, the courts are likely to take a lenient view of this issue. I don’t think Obama can prevail in the courts. Look at this isuue in any way if Obama gets the Democratic nomination, he will be a loser.

Posted by: Kris | May 25, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Hillary supporters, if Hillary does not win the nomination, you cannot write her name in or not vote and she cannot run as an Independant!!! We need to make sure that Obama does not win the GE and to do that we need to vote McCain! Hillary said she could beat McCain and Obama could not…we need to make sure that she is correct! If not Hillary then McCain!

Posted by: micha6888 | May 25, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

I agree with President Carter.
While he was not an especially good president, the reality is this; if the Democrats want to enjoy any chance of winning the general election, they must support a consensus candidate, heal, if possible, and focus on beating McCain.
I personally think the “super-delegate” system is undemocratic; I’d like to abolish it.
Why can’t voters, simple voters, be TRUSTED to choose their nominee.
The real shame in this race, aside from the super-delegate sham, is that the voters of Florida and Michigan may be denied a vote that counts.
That’s not democracy.
Hail to the DNC! :(
Hail to Gov. Dean. :(

Posted by: Bob Eskew | May 25, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Kris,
If McCain where to win I dont think it would be Obama who would Chalange it… I think it would be a law group of some kind.. It would be really interesting how it would go! Article Two of the United States Constitution is very Clear in its terms. He was born on foreign soil as far as Article two is worded.
I think the republicans know they are going to lose thats why they let McCain run remember the party was asking him to give up his senate seat so they dont lose it “when he wins” its no secret they’d rather he wasnt in the party!
What do you think would happen if he won Kris ?

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

micha6888,
Voting for war in Iraq was poor judgement voting for anyone who wants to continue that war is worse judgement !
Who cares about REV RIGHT ? NOT ME

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Bob Eskew,
The rules comitee should hold new elections for florida and michigan…
I think Obama will win them both!

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

micha6888,
Who said they will bring the war to an immediate end ??
Your having a straw man argument I never said anyone would !
Orange cat thanks for the spelling check : )

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

So, if my parents, citizens of the US, were in Italy on vacation when I was born, I would not be a citizen? Of course I would. Some people are so dense.

Posted by: mike | May 25, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

RL in Illinois,
Obama was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii
PLEASE DONT LIE ITS BORING ! IT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED : )

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

TODAYS New York Times/CBS News poll Obamas ahead!
The New York Times/CBS News poll found Obama strongly ahead of Clinton and McCain

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

I am convinced that democratic party will loose in November. I see more and more attempts to force a woman out of the race in the name of unity. Do we care for democracy and democratic process ? Why Hillary should justify staying in the race ? This is her right. If democratic party ignores Michigan and Florida, they may loose both states.

Posted by: Ramesh Dave | May 26, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Ramesh Dave,
Hillary said that FL and Michigan dont count everyone voted knowing that!
and this line about pushing a woman out of the race she has lost obama needs 49 delegates to win the nomination! He just picked up three more in hawai.
Obama said she can stay as long as she wants its the people who voted that voted against her !

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Hillary needs to stay in the race until the DNC convention. Let the vote be taken and let the voters decide. Why Obama campaign wants to stop democracy and stop the vote is beyond me?!?!?! I have to agree with Bill Clinton that she has been seriously disrespected. It’s pathetic the unfairness in the coverage. I would consider voting for her in the general election.

Posted by: Joe | May 26, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Joe,
Last vote is june 3rd then its over Obama will mostly wrap this up in on saturday and he will be the nominee.
What would the point of her going on be ?
Joe your a republican your not going to vote for Hillary you just ant the democrats to fight because you know john mccain sucks!

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Pelosi said Clinton can stay in the race as long as she wants why dont you like her ?

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

RoyM,
Is bring decency back!
NICE WORK !
Obama 08 12

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Until the convention there is no nominee.
There is only a “presumptive nominee.”

Posted by: josgirl | May 26, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

The democrats have already said they will hold a meeting at the end of the primary contests to make sure the presumptive nominee who ever that is.. will be the nominee it was Clintons idea when she thought she would win!
It will be a minni convention.. We will know the nominee then!

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Kate, superdelegates can say whatever they want until the convention, but as we’ve seen, they can always change their minds.
Their endorsements are not binding.
Think about it, McCain is not the “official” nominee, either.
So, even if HRC drops out, Obama is still the “presumptive nominee.”

Posted by: josgirl | May 26, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

IT IS ALMOST JUNE, and it looks as if Hillary is going to stick it out until the Fall. What she had said verbally was that “something may be found out” about Obama by then. In other words, her camp may get a chance to make up something by then and at that point there will be no chance of either explaining, denying, or anything to discount because of a lack of TIME. This is either foolish or devious. Take your pick. However, if she is voted to be the candidate for the Democrats, I will vote for her even though I do not like or trust her. Can the Hillary followers say the same about Obama?

Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 26, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

josgirl,
Super D’s can go where ever they want but obama leads in the pledged delegates so it doesnt really mater.. Obama is 190 ahead in them.. the ones you earn for winning the votes of the people!
John McCain is the nominee they dont have super delegates in the republican party.
“presumptive nominee.” is just the term they use to make the conventions seem important when really all it is, is one long comercial that the news covers for free!

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

ChayaFradle,
Every woman who cares about the right to choose will vote for Obama
Any person who is against this dumb war and the next dumb war with Iran will vote against McCain and for OBAMA.
Anyone who is voting for McCain was already voting for McCain regardless of wether it was Clinton or Obama!
Just like Im voting for Obama but would have voted for Clinton had she won!

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Pledged delegates are very corrupted people. They voted as they pleased, in many states they were a lot of complains, Mrs. Clinton won several counties and caucuses and yet the pledged delegates voted for Mr. Obama, many of these pledged delegates admitted about money offers, and others were influenced and pressured. Basically Mrs. Clinton have been cheated. In California Mr. Obama didn’t get a single vote in many counties yet the pledged delegates which are mostly males voted for Mr. Obama. The Democratic party is truly a mess.

Posted by: alice newton | May 26, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

She revels in being an infernal
nuisance. She may not pack it in
soon after June 3.
She won’t leave the stage on her
own. You have to give her the
hook.

Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Kate, if Hillary doesn’t drop out it goes to the convention.
Neither delegates or superdelegates are legally bound to either candidate.

Posted by: josgirl | May 26, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

alice newton,
Obama has won 33 primaries to Clintons 18…
If it was the other way around an obama was winning then it would be a different story Clinton has lost because she hasnt won over the people not because its been stolen from her!
Obama has 1974 with 314.5 super Ds
Hillary has 1782 with 282.5 super Ds
Without super delegates:
Obama has 1660 delegates
Clinton has 1460 delegates.
She is lossing fair and square!
No shinigans

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

Alice Newton,
I agree.
Every time he lose the next day he gets endorsement to catch up the delegates.

Posted by: catleya | May 26, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

Doesn’t matter until the convention Kate.
Unless Clinton drops out.
That’s why Carter said after June 3, she should drop out.
If it was going to be settled then, it wouldn’t matter if she dropped out or not.

Posted by: josgirl | May 26, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

josgirl,
You wrote:
Kate, if Hillary doesn’t drop out it goes to the convention.
Neither delegates or superdelegates are legally bound to either candidate.
Every other election the person who won the most pledged delegates won every other election the person who is losing by as much as Hillary is would have droped out for the good of the party!
I ant to see a woman president but i dont think Hillary is the right woman to be president!
Obama has ran the better campaign he has stuck up for Clinton when she has made mistakes he hasnt gone after her she on the other hand has gone after him like he was a republican..

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

catleya,
You agree with what ? the numbers are all there for you to see !

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Kate,
Obama won 33 primary???
What states?

Posted by: catleya | May 26, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

The comments made by Super delegates like former President Jimmy Carter, McCarthy, and Edwards inferring that Hillary should drop of out the race infuriates me.
It seems as though the main losers in the Democratic Party, and the ones calling for her to quit. Carter lost a second term. McCarthy did not make it. Edwards lost as candidate then as V.P. in the general election. So why are they so uneasy about Hillary staying in?
I will tell you. Because the DNC and the Super delegates made a MESS out of this election, process and they are looking for an EASY WAY OUT. If Hillary drops out, things will get EASY. Everyone will have a nice long summer vacation, and they can sit back and smoke their CIGARS in the “Good Old’ Boys Network”.
Hillary, don’t make it easy for any of them. Let them SWEAT and unscramble the mess their BRILLIANT MINDS HAVE MADE!

Posted by: DRPolitics1 | May 26, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

This Democratic primary is atypical for many reasons.
That being said, without some sort of deal being made between HRC and BHO before the convention, the possibility of a brokered convention looms.

Posted by: josgirl | May 26, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

DR Politic 1,
Thanks
Yes,.. Go Hillary keeps fighting.

Posted by: catleya | May 26, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

catleya,
caucuses requires the same checks as primaries and Clintons wins are not all primaries either! Only one state required a Driver licence check and hillary and Obama are against that as are all the democrats!
Please answer my question so even though hillary lost 18 to 33.
You think she should somehow still win this ?

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

Kate,
Those states Obama won are not really count in the GE.
Yes, they are counted for the nomination.
In the GE only electoral votes.
Those are Hillary won not Obama’s.
She is the better candidate to beat McCain.

Posted by: catleya | May 26, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

DRPolitics1,
Yeah they made a mess but Clinton has lost she can not win it fairly so why is she staying in ? She hasnt been robbed of a win she was owed she just lost fair and square!
What good is she doing staying in ?
I dont care how long she stays she has lost! The only person she helps is the republicans. Yippy for her !

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Kate, getting emotional solves nothing.
Remember, rules are rules.
There is no rule that says the person with the most delegates wins before the convention.
That’s why the media’s and Obama supporters’ claims that “she has every right to stay in the race” are so offensive.
We know that.
He can’t win unless she quits.
And so far, she ain’t quittin’.

Posted by: josgirl | May 26, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am

Tom in California,
Thats what i think too!

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

I think Hillary is sickly obsessed with becoming President, afterall, if you don’t quite make it then it is not the end of the world, there are other ways to contribute to society.

Posted by: Marty | May 26, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

Have you noticied how Hillary, when campaigning always looks like she is meeting a long lost friend with a lot of FAKE enthusiasm ?

Posted by: Charlie Richmond | May 26, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am

Senator Clinton, will have to give up this quest for the presidency; thanks to our GREAT COUNTRIES favorite peanut farmer. JIMMY CARTER:would make a good running mate for OBAMA. The former president is more capable than a lot of the canadates. Barack, could then fill his cabinet with the DEMOCRATS who ran against him. Just wishful thinking on my part.In the interest of UNITY in our party and the UNITED STATES,PRESIDENT OBAMA, should add a few good men from the GOP. Again wishful thinking on my part. Enough said. I’m done.

Posted by: SMITTYWITTY5637 | May 26, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

Well, well, another example of denying women the right to wage an undisturbed campaign to win the Presidency! How democratic, mr. Carter! This issue will only be solved on the Convention in september, as it should be, because nobody will have enough pledged candidates before that time. Those are the rules, let’s stick with them.

Posted by: donbier44 | May 26, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am

All I’m saying is that there is an anti-feminist bias in the media, which can be seen as a new form of racism.
Hillary would be a fine president, but she’s not been given a chance in this hysterical witchhunt on her, to force her to quit. She should not quit, but fight till the end as a matter of principle.

Posted by: donbier44 | May 26, 2008, 6:02 am 6:02 am

donbier44,
As a woman Hillary Clinton is doing nothing for us. She makes us look irrational and manipulative… But Hillary doesnt care this is about her and only her isnt it! She lost fair and square but she stays in it! If she has to destroy the party so she can win then so be it… If she has to make John McCain win the general so she can win in 2012 then so be it.. If we have to lose a right to choose along the way then so be it because she is doing this for us isnt she ?

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Jimmy Carter……really. I assume in his old age he forgot what a mockery he was and how he humiliated the US. I think the HAMAS lovin’ Ex-President should make up for the embarrassment he caused us all by going away.

Posted by: Mark David | May 26, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am

Rick from Pa,
If hillary is so great why cant she win ?
you ask why cant obama close the deal ?he will real soon but the bigger question is why cant Clinton the great beat Barack Obama why has she lost to him 33 contests to her 18 ?

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am

Mark David,
Talking to people doesnt mean you love them! I dont love you! Jimmy Carter made a an effort to try to bring peace to an area they truly need some! Better to try something for good then do nothing!

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

Hillary supporters wants to win at any cost. Hillary has made a ton a errors that you never point out. Obama has to come out and bail her out every time. I think he has run wonderful campaign class. Thats a gentleman.

Posted by: tony | May 26, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am

Pres. Carter says Clinton will achieve nothing by staying in the race? Wow.
Obama is unelectable not because of his color or Rev. Wright, but because of his off-the-deep-end politics and his duplicity of speech, which will start to be exposed by the Republicans about one month after Hillary exits the race (they would not show their ace cards at this point, because that would only help Hillary, the strongest candidate).
Hillary needs to prove (for Democrats in 2012) that “I told you so!” when Obama crashes in November. For Carter not to show an understanding of this is odd. He cares more to bring pro-Obama propaganda to the table rather than clarity.

Posted by: Mark | May 26, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Carter was probably, next to Herbert Hoover, the absolutely worst President in US history. Remember the Iranian hostage fiasco? the botched rescue attempt of US hostages? Their years of imprisonment? His utter inaction (hiding in the White House). Or how about the runaway inflation AND economic recission at the same time? Lately, he met with the terrorists, Hamas, and announces they will accept peace in exchange for release of imprisoned murders and more land and $, etc., but TRUTH was it they only agreed to a temporary truce! PLEASE don’t tell us what Carter thinks or wants. We the public don’t care! The dupe is just trying to wiggle his way back into relevance on Obama’s coattails!

Posted by: ebobster | May 26, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Kate and other Obama supporters,
I just speak for myself. I am not a paid blogger and I intend to stay loyal to Hillary until the end. She may be tired and may face long odds. If people accuse of Hillary lying or misquoting, just show me an individual who did not lie or skillfully not tell the truth.
We cannot call ourselves a true Democracy unless every vote counts no matter what rules DNC made or how many times an individual changes his or her mind. If some of the Obama supporters did not care to participate in the MI and FL primaries, that’s the decision they made.
No matter what the final outcome is, I am determined as you are… Hillary is my first choice and second choice is John McCain. Let all individuals make their own decisions.

Posted by: Kris | May 26, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Kate:
My Point: Carter is a mockery……for him to suggest anything to anyone is a complete joke.
He had his moment in the sun and made a mess of it. He can as he has already done continue his work with habitat….the only way to make up for the shame he brought on this nation.
Other than that he can mind his own business or he will go down in history just as Judas Richardson and the like will.

Posted by: Mark David | May 26, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Comments like Carter’s reveal the treachery and hypocrisy of the DNC toward Clinton.
Voters won’t forget. Maybe Obama can go build houses with Carter when this is all over.

Posted by: bromfield22 | May 26, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Carter wasn’t the worst President ever, that distinction belonged to Warren G Harding, until GWB. When Carter took office, inflation was already a problem, and had been since the “guns and butter” policies of Johnson. Nixon and Ford had given lip service to addressing the problem, but Carter did something: he appointed a Fed chief with a harsh plan on hos to solve the problem. Paul Volker systematically pushed interest rates up while controlling the monetary supply. Reagan is given the credit for the recovery, but it was the stable base created by Volkers plan that made it happen.

Posted by: Javalation | May 26, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Kris,
Everyone was told FL in Michigan dont count! You cant change the rules after the game! Clinton said it herself “the michigan and fl elections dont count for anything”
Rules are rules eveyone was told they dont count!

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Anthony,
It appears your definition of the strongest candidate is the one who loses big states such as, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, W. Virginia, and Texas and wins states that have caucuses. May be the change that you, Obama supporters want is Presidential elections by caucuses.
By the by I am really wondering if some of the writers on this blog are paid bloggers.

Posted by: Kris | May 26, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Who cares what Jimmy Carter thinks? He was a terrible president and has come close to committing treason by intervening in U.S. foreign policy. It is time for Carter to retire to peanut farming, his real area of expertise.

Posted by: Graniteman | May 26, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

I am seeing that democratic party is anxious to push Hillary Clinton out of the race. Why is this party afraid of letting the process complete ? I have helped this party in the past. I would not do it again unless some key people like Howard Dean are replaced with more reasonable people. Ruling regarding Michigan and Florida was bad and it will haunt the party when they lose at least one of the two states in November.

Posted by: Ramesh Dave | May 26, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Kate, you are right. This election is not about Obama, HRC or McSame. It is about the dumb war in Iraq and to avoid the next dumb war in Iran. This war is economically dumb, politically stupid and morally wrong. It achieves nothing but only help our enemy to be stronger politically and the Saudi and Kuwait to get rich on us at our own expense. Obama’s team has the vision and the right strategy to get the troop home and reinvest the money in our next generation. For those who are worry about US security due to this pullout, look, first, our security was not threaten after we pulled out of Viet Nam, but in fact, getting stronger after the political situation corrected itself. Second, we can’t be more secure when we are politically and morally wrong. Obama team’s strategy is a different and smarter ballgame serving the interests of the country, not the oilers or warmongers. HRC failed because her team did not offer a clear vision on this war, only election-year tactics.

Posted by: Pete | May 26, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

She’s a nuisance – public nuisance,
private nuisance, common nuisance,
mixed nuisance, unabatable nuisance,
every kind of nuisance there is.
She’s neither remediable nor
redeemable.
Give her the hook. Get her off
the stage.

Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Let’s role reverse. If we were to switch characters, the dnc would be screaming for obama to stay in the race, that he is closing in on her, and that obama has the electoral edge. the dnc would be clammoring for the supers to disregard the pledged delegate count and go for obama, and they would claim that he has all the momentum based on the landslide victories in ky and west virg. that is the truth.
this hillary supporter will write in the name clinton if obama is the nominee. take that to the bank and cash it.

Posted by: fred | May 26, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Go Hillary you can do this,show the people you are a strong woman.

Posted by: Lecreata | May 26, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

She’s not a fighter, she’s not
a strong woman, she doesn’t
stand for anything good – she’s
a mean-spirited, chronic
malcontent.

Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I HAVE TO AGREE WITH PRESIDENT CLINTON ON THIS ONE. THE MEDIA HAS TREATED BARACK OBAMA LIKE HE’S RUNNING FOR PROM KING AND ALL THE WHILE DOING EVERYTHING THEY COULD TO DEMEAN ANY OF HILLARY’S VICTORIES. EVEN WHEN SHE KICKED HIS BUTT IN TEXAS, RHODE ISLAND AND OHIO THAT NIGHT, WE RECIEVED VERY SHORT-LIVED MEDIA COVERAGE……..
I’M AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN SUPPORTER OF HILLARY CLINTON AND I MUST SAY THAT NOW I’M NOT SURE WHOM I’LL VOTE FOR IN NOVEMBER. I FEEL THAT THE MEDIA AS WELL AS SOME SUPERIOR DEMOCRATS REALIZE THAT OBAMA WILL NOT WIN IN NOVEMBER, BUT HAVE CREATED SUCH A HUGE PEDESTAL FOR OBAMA TO STAND ON THAT IF THEY PULL THEIR SUPPORT NOW THEY WILL BE VIEWED AS RACISTS. THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN HAS STRATEGICALLY AND CAUTIOUSLY PLAYED THE RACE CARD THROUGH OUT THE CAMPAIGN. HERE WE HAVE A CANDIDATE THAT IS WINNING IN THE POPULAR VOTE IN STATES THAT MATTER IN A GENERAL ELECTION AND THE MEDIA IS SELLING US A CANDIDATE WHO MAKES GOOD SPEECHES AND HAS NO EXPERIENCE…… GO FIGURE!

Posted by: Eric | May 26, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Could anyone that is not totally brain dead tell why it’s important for us to know what jimmy carter thinks on any subject. This man is a fool and should be put in a home. How sad it must be for his family to see him like this but to hear him OMG. Do the world a favor stop printing what this poor old stupid loser thinks.

Posted by: a citizen | May 26, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Thirty five years of nothing,
piddling, worthless experience.
More than 20 million dollars
amassed in campaign debt.
Hundreds of unpaid bills to
small vendors and small
businesses. Some three hundred
fifty thousand dollars owed
to health insurance companies
covering her staff – and she
wants to make health insurance mandatory even if you can’t
pay the premiums.
Just go home, babe.

Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Go back to Plains, Jimmy Carter. You were a big mistake that got elected and Obama is a bigger one. I THOUGHT you were a patriot, and I know Obama isn’t, but one thing I thought before your election that the American people had gotten this wrong, & I wasn’t wrong.

Posted by: virginia | May 26, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS – TAKE NOTICE
———–ROE v. WADE———–
Two of the current justices of the United States Supreme Court will probably retire within the next four years. One is 75 and the other is 84. This will give the new president the ability to nominate two new justices. If McCain is elected you can be sure the new justices will be just like Roberts, Scalia and Thomas: willing to overturn ROE v. WADE. So think when you vote!!!

Posted by: rhbate | May 26, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

a good history you can deny all you want as most of the black people have done. which is a shame.
where has obama been?
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008 10:06:26 AM
_________________
You think so: HILLARY LOVED IT WHEN OVER 90% OF THE BLACKS VOTED FOR BILL FOR PRESIDENT IN 1992 AND 1996.

Posted by: rhbate | May 26, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

rhbate – and they loved the caucus voting, and moveon and anyone who didn’t think it was a crime for the CIC to lie to a grand jury.

Posted by: fivepin | May 26, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

“I’m a superdelegate.”
Question: Which three words from Jimmy Carter do not bode well for the future of the Republic?

Posted by: proof | May 26, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Will someone PLEASE tell Jimmy Carter, that he is not obligated to support Hillary. Just go ahead and support Obama if that is what you want to do in the first place.
I really WISH that a political cartoonist could do a drawing on this article. It shows that he has a bad conscience since its taking him so long to make a public decision.
Actually, he does not need to let us know anything. Can someone let Jimmy know the rules of this Super delegate process?

Posted by: politicalwatcher | May 26, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Kate:
It does not matter who made the rules and also I do not care even if both Hillary and Obama want to ignore FL and MI, the DNC simply cannot disfranchise millions of voters in these two states. The DNC may have to hold primaries again in these states. As a matter of fact Obama may be more agreeable to new primaries in these states since he thinks he has the momentum and the big money.
Bottomline is the DNC has to seat the delegates from FL and MI if needed after holding new primaries. We cannot call ourselves a true Democracy if these states are not represented at the national convention.
The DNC would be harming Obama’s prospects in the National Elections if it were to stubbornly cling to its rules and have no reps from these states at the convention. The Republicans would be very happy.
In the mean time, I hope Obama support groups are working how to challenge McCain’s victory on the grounds that he was not born on U.S. soil. It will be interesting to see how McCain’s supporters react to this challenge.
Thanks.

Posted by: Kris | May 26, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

If Obama can win the race, he would not have all his fanatics and party pundits to push Hillary out of the race. That is his strategy: he can’t win the race so he wants to be the only one to cross the finish line. on tracks, it is a foul. In baseball, we call it a steal. In tennis, it is a rain-out.
For democrates, it is a shame. The party are working like an animal farm of the Carter brand.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 26, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

I said it once and I will say it again.
If hillary Clinton loss the nominee Barack Obama will loss the presidential on November. Why? Because I am voting for McCain. Simple as that. I urge all Hillary supporter to switch to John McCain and forget about having more problems from Obama….Simple as that.

Posted by: pete | May 26, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Senator Clinton: Good advice for you from Shakespeare (Macbeth): “Stand not upon the order of your going, but go at once.”

Posted by: Tom in California | May 26, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Dear Mr. Carter,
I am completely amazed and profoundly disappointed in your recent call for Senator Clinton to pull out of the democratic race for president! I have been a staunch supporter and admirer of you for many years, indeed, defending you and your policies with people and friends who think you were one of the worst presidents to rule the U.S. in recent history. Why in the world would you do this in a campaign that is so close (actually Senator Clinton does have the popular vote, as the caucus system (that good ole boy, strong arm way of getting your “man” in) should be eliminated next time around and ignored this time around; you know this, I know.
And, I cannot believe you would support the DNC and it’s refusal to count the delegates in Michigan and Florida. Do you really think the voters should lose their rights because the DNC, who has blatantly supported Obama from the beginning, did not follow the rules? This if far too parental and punishing the people for decisions they did not make or agree too is preposterous!!! What are we, in kindergarten? In your break-neck attempt to shove Obama down our throats, you are ignoring millions of people’s right to vote! What gives you the right to do this????? Nader had it right when he said both parties are the same! The Republicans did this to us in 2000 and now OUR OWN PARTY is attempting to do it to us now!
Your attempts to bring this race to an early end is just hurting Obama this fall. Just keep this in mind: you dig in your heals and so will we. If you and your “good ole boy” buddies succeed in forcing Senator Clinton out of the race (and after such despicable favoritism for Obama from the beginning!), you will succeed in tearing the Democratic party apart (this from a man who claims he will unite the country?). I plan on helping to organize a “DON’T WRITE HER OFF; WRITE HER IN” campaign immediately. This is not an idle threat, it is a promise. I will also be working on organizing a mass rally at the Democratic Convention in August!
Jeanie Lockamy
mjlockamy@yahoo.com

Posted by: jeanie lockamy | May 26, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Peanuts to Jimmy Carter. Hillary is not hurting the party because the voters make up the party and Hillary will probably win in popular vote. Obama will not have enough delegates to win the nomination so he has not won anything. Hillary should go all the way to the convention because many of her supporters will not vote for Obama if he wins the nomination. Mr. Peanut and Jelly Bean Dean should not be trying to run the party. They are party poopers for sure.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 26, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Well, there you have it!! If Jimmy Carter says ‘it is time’, then don’t you know that Bill and Hillary will immediately fold their tent and head back to Arkansas?? (Only in his dreams — and ours!!)

Posted by: jack | May 26, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Jimmy Carter is a fine one to talk. He couldn’t even recapture the Presidency. Okay, so Clinton supporters, an ex-President is telling you it’s time to leave this party. A party made up of a bunch of old, white guys. As long as old-white guys are the thing, vote for McCain. Or tell McCain to put General Powell on his ticket and the Republicans can win in a LANDSLIDE. Democrats are the world’s biggest losers. Ask me, I was one until NOW.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 26, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Hillary should be No. One on the ticket. Obama should practice as a chaplain for a short time before becoming vice president for a legend.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 26, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

You know what else I find curious, President Carter? Teddy Kennedy wouldn’t concede the race to you in 1980 and he was behind 700 delegates. He stayed in because he felt he was going to win the popular vote. That’s the same reason that Hillary is in it, because she likely will win it — votes that is. The thing that used to matter before Dems got all cutesy with the proportional delegates. You can in retrospect say that maybe Hillary’s staying in will have the same effect that Teddy staying in had on you. Or maybe you’ll have to face the fact that you were no match for Ronald Reagan. In fact, the only mistake Hillary made this weekend was in invoking the wrong Kennedy. She could have mentioned Teddy Kennedy staying in all the way to the convention — even though the polls showed he was so liberal that only 30% of the country wanted him. Who has been pushing the most to get Hillary out of the race — Hillary who depending on the week still bests both Obama and McCain in polls — it’s people like you, President Carter and Ted Kennedy and John Kerry and Howard Dean. How dare you suggest that this woman out to get out and not be allowed to do what all the men were allowed to do? Which is basically…run the damn race.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 26, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

carter WHO????? Oh you mean that idiot that took our interest to over 20%, sent soldiers to iran to die, lost in a windfall to Reagan & spoke to terrorists a couple of weeks ago that Carter????? WHAT A JOKE WHY WOULD A WINNER LIKE HILLARY LISTEN TO THAT DRIVEL!!!!!!!

Posted by: politicgirl | May 26, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

She’s a legend in her own
mind and a minor footnote
in this year’s election
story.
After June 3, she’ll be
Hillary Who?

Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

The Superdelegates should be hearing the voters in the party that prefer Hillary instead of the rant of the news media like CNN & MSNBC who are promoting the chosen one. These Superdelegates like MR PEANUT that run after Obama may get a suprise in this election.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 26, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Carter = one-termer, muff said. About RoeVWade being overturned, THE UNBORN HAVE RIGHTS TOO!!! GO MCCAIN 2008

Posted by: mary | May 26, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

I received a letter the other day saying that I had paid more into my candidate than the law allows. The letter urged me to allow Hillary to pass my excess money on to the DNC, on to the General Election. For Barack Obama? I attached a nice note back. Hillary, for once, I disagree with you. If your name is somewhere on that ticket, the Dems can have my money and my vote. If Clinton isn’t on the ballot somewhere, I want a refund. I don’t know of any Clinton supporter who is passing assets along to the DNC.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 26, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Look at some of McCain’s
policies.
Iraq war:
will go on, if you want
to see the end of it
stick around a hundred
years
Economy:
doesn’t understand it
Veterans’ benefits:
they are already getting
too much
Taxes:
more cuts for the wealthy,
make them permanent
Illegal immigration:
let’s have more of it
Health care:
what about it?
Energy policy:
no gas tax for 3 months
Sane people will not elect
this man as their town
dogcatcher.

Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Florida and MI proposed solutions from Politico. Rather interesting read and is truly accurate in its respresenation of what has occured and what could occur:

Posted by: Bill | May 26, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

She’s a nuisance – public nuisance,
private nuisance, common nuisance,
mixed nuisance, unabatable nuisance,
every kind of nuisance there is.
She’s neither remediable nor
redeemable.
Give her the hook. Get her off
the stage.
Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008 12:31:06 PM
____________________________
PEOPLE LIKE YOU MAKE IT EASY FOR ME TO HELP OBAMA LOSE BIG!!!
KEEP HI-FIFING YOURSELF IDIOT.

Posted by: TJ | May 26, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

You forget the knock on McCain when he first one the nomination is that he’s too moderate for the Republicans. I know conservatives today who still don’t want him. If McCain chooses the right VP, if he makes a more progressive stance towards green jobs and saving the environment, moves to end this war and thereby save the economy…he becomes a centrist. That’s all the majority of people want this time around is a centrist. Hillary is a centrist. McCain who is standing slightly right of center has the ability to be completely centrist if he didn’t think he would have to appease the evangelicals to get elected. How bizarre that Democrats could likely find the President they wanted, not in Obama, but in McCain. It’s truly within John’s grasp if he recognizes how to move to center.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 26, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Kris,
YOU WROTE:
“DNC simply cannot disfranchise millions of voters in these two states.”
I agree 100% to disinfranchise the millions of voters from that state but that includes thouse who did partipate because they were told the votes that was held wouldnt count! Told that by every one including Hillary.
I was a Hilary supporter but how she has acted has both sadenned and agered me. She has made it like she cares about FL and Michigan and it Obama fault the votes dont count when she is equaly responsiable for the stituation. Its also shows a hudge lack of leadership by Howard Dean..It shold never have been allowed to get to this.
I actually agree with you that if they can they should hold new votes once the other contests are over and the should just do like the republicans did and give both state half a vote.. So other states know FL and Michigan are not being rewarded for breaking the rules.

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

McCain is no centrist. Derides
direct diplomacy. He wants war
with Iran. Then its extension:
WW3.
He seems to have no taste for
dealing with major domestic
issues such as energy
dependence and the sagging
economy.
Like Bush he seems to be
preoccupied 24/7 with
mickey-mouse countries like
Iran, North Korea and
Venezuela.

Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Of the two Democratic presidents today, there is no comparison. Bill Clinton is by far more credible.
Carter – habitually meets with fringe and thugs. Clinton – a moderate who (in keeping with Presidential tradition) does not defy the current Administration.
Carter – associated to 9/11 conspiracy theorists (see Dershowitz article). Clinton – confronts these nuts, as such, when they heckle him.
Carter sure sets the bar low, but the Clintons are a class act, regardless.

Posted by: Mark | May 26, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

In 2007, Michigan and Florida, in direct violation of party rules, scheduled their votes with the full knowledge that the Democratic Party would not recognize their results. In the context of most nominating contests, which are decided after only a handful of states vote, Michigan and Florida figured that it was better to stage an early “beauty contest” than to hold an election once the race was all but decided. The Democratic candidates did not campaign in either state, and only Clinton was on the Michigan ballot, which makes it all the more unconscionable for her campaign to be calling for the Florida and Michigan delegations to be seated.

Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Obama had his name removed from the Michigan ballot. He requested
that his name be removed in
Florida as well. Apparently, the
Republican-controlled state
legislature prevailed in keeping
his name on the ballot there. The
state would not remove it.
The Obama campaign has
scrupulously tried to comply
with the DNC rulings.

Posted by: anon | May 26, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

JIMMY CARTER WAS A VERY WEAK PRESIDENT, THAT’S WHY HE COULDN’T EVEN GET RE-ELECTED FOR A SECOND TERM. CARTER WAS WEAK ON TERRORIST COUNTRIES AND NO WONDER IRAN MILITANT TOOK AMERICAN HOSTAGES AND HELD THEM FOR NEARLY TWO YEARS…..CARTER IS LIKE OBAMA…THEY ARE BOTH WEAK PACIFIST THAT OUR ENEMIES KNOW ARE SOFT….NO WONDER CARTER WANTS OBAMA AS PRESIDENT…..BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER.

Posted by: John Pen | May 26, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

What a crusty old man. After she “gives it up” should she resort to talking with terrorists and making a spectacle of her self with those who wish us and our allies grave harm? Oh I am sorry thats what retired presidents who fail to get the release of hostages and come up with a lasting energy policy do. My bad!

Posted by: Robert John Kellogg | May 26, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Can you imagine anyone saying about Edwards, “it will be time for him to give it up”. Maybe I have been listening to Bill Clinton for too long, but the way Carter phrased this comment seems sexist.
The MSM is blatantly unfair to Hillary. Obama is the most liberal candidate from the Senate. The democrats know how to loose a general election.
Hillary ’08!

Posted by: keval | May 26, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

With so much racism and hatred on Senator Obama, Senator Clinton who in their RIGHT MIND would want to be President of the Divided States of America……I give us about 10 more years when we have sold America to foreign country and THEN EVERY ONE WILL BE HAPPY WHEN WE ARE A DICTATORSHIP NATION…..LAST LAUGH ON US AMERICANS..

Posted by: Della | May 26, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

AND P.S. PRESIDENT CARTER DESERVES OUR RESPECT….

Posted by: Della | May 26, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

I sure hope President Carter is right very soon HC will give up – give up the Dem party to run as independent.

Posted by: esvida | May 26, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Hillary isn’t going to quit ever–that’s something that a quitting loser like Jimmy Carter doesn’t comprehend. She is tougher than the rest of the DNC put together. Tell Jimmy to go sell us out to N Korea or to Hamas some more. The pathetic chapter of American history that was the Jimmy Carter Presidency is now just a frightening, and nauseating memory. If anyone can talk this geriatric loser into being quiet, the USA would owe you a debt of gratitude.

Posted by: M Hayward | May 26, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Kris,
Winning states in the primary is not the same as winning them in the general election. John McCain won all the states that you mentioned in the Republican primary. Michael Dukakis won most of the state that you mentioned (except MI), in fact he won 30 states. The polls had him way ahead of George HW Bush after the Democratic convention. Of course, Bush started campaigning against him, and Dukakis made some mistakes and were an uninspiring candidate. The rest was history.

Posted by: anthony | May 26, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

I checked on the CNN website and it appeared that Romney won MI, not McCain. I remembered that McCain won all the big states. I guess I remembered wrong.

Posted by: anthony | May 26, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

McCain is currently right of center, but could be a centrist if he knew for certain he did have to pander to evangelicals to get elected. I say we take McCain, and tell him where he needs to bend. At the end of the day, this too is a business. If John knows this is unwinnable unless he makes a stand for the environment and the economy and stands up to those who wanted war (even for 5 more years), I think he’ll make a good President. Please do not elect Obama. He will be as weak as Jimmy Carter was. Lest you forget, here we were, the great America — held hostage by some idiots who got hold of planes. It didn’t happen again until George W, which ought to tell everyone something. You have to have a steel set to run that office. That’s why I love Hillary.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 27, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Go away, Carter! No one wants to hear you and see you! You tried to steer the media and voters. I, my husband and my other family members will all vote for Mcgain if Hillary lose, just to let you and other superdelegates regret that you did this.

Posted by: lynn | May 27, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

As a resident of the state of NY where Hillary is a Senator, I wouldn’t vote for her if I were paid to do so.
There is not enough money in the world to get me to vote that woman into the White House.

Posted by: Wouldnt Vote HC if Paid | May 27, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

Jimmy Carter was the worst president in my lifetime, and I’ve been around since Eisenhower. He should shut up and go build houses. Hillary would make a fine President, but there is a game afoot to install Obama into the White House by DNC liberals and the media. I would never put such a novice into the White House – too dangerous.

Posted by: Jenna NY | May 27, 2008, 6:12 am 6:12 am

Senator Clinton won a victorious and triumphant LANDSLIDE victory in Florida.
The people who so desperately voted for her there will never tolerate their precious votes going to waste.
It is so obvious; the overwhealming tide of sexism has created a mountainous wave in the ocean of DEMOCRACY. Hillary, if you continue to fight for your justifiable right to claim Florida, which you won triumphantly with your effortless charm and courage, aplomb and character on the back of sheer hard work and love of your country, you will achieve what you strove so hard for. You will make America proud in the face of adversity.

Posted by: Magdalen | May 27, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am

Jenna NY, you are so right in the remark you just made. Obama is useless on his own merit. He needs Jimmy Carter and Ted Kennedy to hold him up by the ropes, or he’ll fall. It is the likes of such superdelegates who want to have power in America through the stupid, self opinionated Obama,and whose aim is to use him as the young inexperienced SCAPEGOAT, only to act as a mouthpiece or puppet for their own self seeking interests. The Obamas come up with STUPID and PRIMITIVE remarks like:
For the first time in my life I’m proud to be an American AND small town Americans turn to guns because they are bitter. Carter is just as much of an idiot, holding dangerous talks with a criminal, savage hooligan gang like HAMAS which would have Adold Hitler laughing in Hell.

Posted by: Magdalen | May 27, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am

I hope Hillary takes this all the way to the convention. The money was raised to revote in Michigan and Florida but Obama said no way. He knew he’d lose big in those 2 states so those 2 states voters mean nothing to him until the general election. He speaks of change and hope but isn’t any different than the rest of the big headed politicians.

Posted by: Dee-GA | May 27, 2008, 7:05 am 7:05 am

A vote for Obama is a vote against the rights of women. A vote for Obama is telling the world that we approve of the malicious way the media has treated Hillary. A vote for Obama tells every woman to go home and stop “stirring up trouble”. A vote for Obama questions the “audacity” of a woman who thinks she has the right to be the President of the United States. A vote for Obama tells our daughters they shouldn’t reach for the stars.

Posted by: reaqlity 80 | May 27, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

Clinto agreed to disfranchise Florida and Michican becaue she thought she can win regardless.Now that she is losing, she wants Michican and Florida to be counted.. what a hypocracy!

Posted by: Samir | May 27, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

How is a votefor Obama a vote against women? Obama has never disrepected women rights in no way. Can Obama control the media, Rev. Wright, or anybody else? Sounds like hate to me.

Posted by: Lawrence | May 27, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

It is a simple matter of observing the rules & principles agreed upon by all parties ahead of the primaries, PERIOD.
It is not a matter of dismissing women or taking away somebody’s rights.

Posted by: Perflead | May 27, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Hillary is a symbol of the
past. She is old politics.
The way she has run her
campaign and the huge debt
she has accumulated also
show that she is thoroughly
incompetent.

Posted by: anon | May 27, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

When you hear some public figure or politician, regardless of who he or she is, trying to stoke anger or stir up public anger against the winner, it should be sufficient for you to understand the nature of that person.
The bottom line is Obama did not make the rules.
The rules were given to all and, all agreed & signed to it.
Now the loser wants to change the agreed & singed rules,stoking public anger to win, because now the loser has realized the rules did not suit her.
I think it is important not to create a precedence like this.
Those who left the race, lost it under the same rules.
Those who voted in every states voted under the same rule.
Rules & principles cannot change because it suits the loser who earlier agreed with the rules, thinking she was insurmountable.
Rules can be change but cannot be applied retroactively because it favors only one party & not all.

Posted by: Perflead | May 27, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Samir where is your support (reliable stories, printed versions of speeches, etc) for these allegations?
(1) A vote for Obama is a vote against the rights of women.
(2) A vote for Obama is telling the world that we approve of the malicious way the media has treated Hillary.
(3) A vote for Obama tells every woman to go home and stop “stirring up trouble”.
(4) A vote for Obama questions the “audacity” of a woman who thinks she has the right to be the President of the United States.
(5) A vote for Obama tells our daughters they shouldn’t reach for the stars.

Posted by: Rae | May 27, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

For those Clinton supporters that intend to vote for McCain if Obama steals the nomination by intimidating superdelegates, please vote Democratic for your congressional elections so that the DNC will learn not to force a presidential candidate down our throats again. And it puts the Kennedys (if he lives), Kerrys and Pelosis in the position of finally having to do something about the mess in this country. They were given a mandate in the last election but they have squandered their voter directive. It also prevents McCain from having the power that Bush enjoyed to continue the war and appoint conservative justices.

Posted by: geteven | May 27, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Just reading some of these comments makes me think I’m in a Faux News forum. How can so many people be blinded by the media and their personal bias? Hillary supporters are bitter that she didn’t get “what she deserved” (the nomination) and Obama supporters (which I will admit I am for Obama) are like starry eyed little girls meeting the newest teen fad. And McCain supporters, well, they’re just delusional. Thank God that the Libertarians will erase any chance they Psycho McFlipFlop has of winning. Here’s a suggestion: Read what your candidate supports and stands for and then decide if they are the one for you. And if you fancy yourself a “party supporter” (i.e. lemming) support the candidate that the party picks. I mean, if you support the party it really shouldn’t matter who gets the nod, right? Just chill and don’t bite on the MSM’s hooks.

Posted by: Eric Heroux | May 27, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Rae, you seem to think that a vote for Obama is a vote against women?! Have you ever thought that people aren’t voting for Hillary because she has the personality of a snake, the temper of a bulldog, and is as self serving as a fat cat? A vote against Clinton is NOT a vote against women but a vote for not having a self-serving, self-caring PERSON in the white house. If Clinton was put in the white house then she would ruin it for all other women because would do such a bad job, and no one would ever vote for a women again.

Posted by: terri | May 27, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Rae, very dramatic rhetoric, but that works for the black argument, too: A vote for Hillary is a vote against rights for blacks / endorsement of the media’s treatment of Obama / sign that minorities should go home, stop meddling or otherwise “making trouble”.
In the end, those types of statements don’t hold water .. they’re just for effect. We owe it to ourselves to dispense with the over-generalized scare tactics.
Women will be cast into darkness if Hillary doesn’t win? Hardly.

Posted by: LaOtraVoz | May 27, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Rae-
Exactly!!! If Hillary doesn’t get the nomination, then it is McCain for those of us that feel it is time to let Obama/Media/DNC know that we won’t stand quietly by and let this happen. Congress will be controlled by the Dems anyway so any fear mongering about Roe v Wade is a moot point.

Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 27, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Carter what a joke him and Billy Boy the worst ever. Who and What does he think he is doing out there anyway He couldn’t do any thing worth while when he was in office What does he think he is doing now he needs to shut up and grow peanuts!!!!

Posted by: ONE OHIOIAN | May 27, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

It is hard to believe that some people are simply ignoring Obama’s lead of 162 in pledge delegates as if she is the one who has the lead of 162 pledge delegates, not him.
162 is a huge lead, Mrs. Clinton would have wished to have.
She would have definitely announced her victory by now with that kind of lead, if she really had one.
It is hard to believe that she is claiming to be victorious, though she is far behind in pledge delegates & popular votes.
She is behind by almost half million in popular votes besides being behind by 162 in pledged delegates.
What if she was really ahead like Obama is today, she would have been making fun of him, had he been asking to give him all the delegates from MI & FL.
It was a unanimous decision and agreed upon by all, including many of them who have left the race and, are now endorsing Obama like, Edwards, Bill Richardson, Dodd and more.
I think it is time to call it quits for her with grace.

Posted by: perflead | May 27, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

People be aware , probably half or more of these completely asinine comments in support of Clinton or against Obama are not Democrats but low life Republicans , MCinsane /Republicans . They want Clinton to win , do not want to face Obama in the Presidential election and also want to drive a wedge between Democrats , the Obama and Clinton supporters . That is a fact .So don’t be fooled , as we have seen over the last seven or eight years these people have no class and no ethics , none .

Posted by: Newt G | May 28, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Let’s turn all those arguments around that the Hillary camp insists on even making an argument. First, Obama is leading in all areas, period. But, regardless:
Any argument that this is a conspiracy against women running for or becoming president is ludicrous! Quoting the ludicrous argument from above:
“A vote for Obama is a vote against the rights of women. A vote for Obama is telling the world that we approve of the malicious way the media has treated Hillary. A vote for Obama tells every woman to go home and stop “stirring up trouble”. A vote for Obama questions the “audacity” of a woman who thinks she has the right to be the President of the United States. A vote for Obama tells our daughters they shouldn’t reach for the stars.”
Let’s turn that around:
“A vote for Hillary is a vote against the rights of all minorities. A vote for Hillary is telling the world that we approve of the malicious way the media has treated race and Obama. A vote for Hillary tells every minority to go home and stop “stirring up trouble”. A vote for Hillary questions the “audacity” of a minority who thinks s/he has the right to be the President of the United States. A vote for Hillary tells minority American citizens they shouldn’t reach for the stars.”
So, get off the soapbox. Obama has it won and it is NO conspiracy or ‘cover up’. If you choose to vote for McBush, it is your right. If you do so because you are vindictive, then it will be on your conscious and I wish you peace of mind and compassion, as it seems you are an angry person(s).

Posted by: JR | May 28, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Newt G
Im sure most of them are fake Clinton supporters!
Clinton supports Obama thats all matters!

Posted by: Mike NC | October 15, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I really cant stand all this Clinton supporters for McCain and PUMA
CNN put the number of Clinton supporters for McCain and PUMA members at 200 000 in September/October down from its high of almost 5 Million.
CNN’s poll found the reason for the change:
Sarah Palin
John McCain’s handling of the economic crissis.
So enough of this PUMA stuff!

Posted by: Mike NC | October 15, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.