By Ed O'Keefe

May 14, 2008 5:38pm

Clinton Camp on Edwards Endorsement: ‘It’s Not Great News’

ABC News’ Kate Snow Reports: "It’s not great news," said a senior Clinton advisor of the news that former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., will break his neutrality and endorse Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in Michigan Wednesday night.

"Well, I don’t think it’s good news, but there’s a lot of news in this business and we move forward and move past it," the Clinton advisor said.

Asked what effect the Edwards endorsement might have: "We don’t know. We’ll see. We’ll see how much of it is transferable," referring to Edwards’ popularity with white working class voters.

Clinton advisor Terry McAuliffe also addressed the endorsement during a quick media availability Wednesday evening outside of the Senator’s house.

"I can’t speak for why people endorse," said McAuliffe, adding, "the voters in West Virginia say it’s not over."

Coming off the heels of a 41-point landslide win in West Virginia, the Clinton camp had hoped to build some momentum, pledging to continue the campaign through the remaining primaries over the next three weeks.

"We’re going on to Kentucky and Oregon and the rest of the contests and then we’ll see what happens with Michigan and Florida and by June 4th we’ll have a clearer idea about where everyone stands," Clinton said in the interview with ABC News’ Charlie Gibson Wednesday.

Clinton also met Wednesday with six uncommitted superdelegates at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee offices in Washington and her campaign hosted a meeting with about 45 or 50 financial supporters to make her case to them and ask them to continue raising money.

Wednesday night Clinton will host a party at her tony Washington residence for top donors.

The Clinton camp continues to make the case that superdelegates are concerned about Obama’s loss in West Virginia and other swing states.

"All I can say is, I don’t want to overdramatize it, but starting with Ohio the remaining superdelegates started really focusing on the 270 electoral vote issue and how do we best assemble that and it’s made a marked impression," the senior Clinton advisor told ABC News.

But then in a moment of candor the advisor conceded, "I’m not sure it’s gonna be enough."

User Comments

Edwards is yet another opportunist in the same old loser club, latte-left tradition as McGovern, Mondale, Kennedy, Dukakis, and Kerry. Nothing new here.

Posted by: Emily | May 14, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The humor…
If he were to endorse Clinton… this would be the turning of the Tide…lol
wow

Posted by: Vanessa | May 14, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Lets not forget Edwards carries 19 delegates and his own SD vote

Posted by: Vanessa | May 14, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

CHANGE is upon America!!!!!!!!
The BEST is yet to come!!!!!!!!

Posted by: JohnS | May 14, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Edwards is part of the Kerry-Edwards train wreck. I still remember how he treated Hillary in the debates. I wouldn’t vote for him if he was the nominee and Obama wasn’t. He’s old news and who cares anyway. He had 1% of supporters when he dropped out. The media wants you to believe that he could bring in some constituencies of Hillary’s to Obama. Very few of his supporters went to Hillary anyway. The majority went to Obama. Hillary still has half the electorate even without Edwards supporters. I’m still angry about the last election 4 years ago. My vote was wasted for the last time.

Posted by: Lois, California | May 14, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Uh, Emily, wasn’t John Edwards Mr. Working Class Champion before it was fashionable? He announced his candidacy in New Orleans’ 9th Ward and went to work on a Habitat for Humanity house immediately after dropping out.
Edwards message will be, I think, clear: it’s time to support the nominee.

Posted by: Jake | May 14, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I don’t care if Franklin Delano Roosevelt is resurrected just so he can endorse obama.
Edwards lost his campaign AGAIN because people saw that he is just another phony politician trying to fool the voters – now they will see that obama is just like Edwards – no substance.
obama is just pandering to the Michigan voters – trying to make up when he told the media – MICHIGAN IS NOT IMPORTANT TO MY CAMPAIGN – eating your words obama?

Posted by: Lou | May 14, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

It’s not surprising that he endorsed Obama based on what he said in a debate last October:
“Will she be the person who brings about the change in this country? I believe in Santa Claus. I believe in the Tooth Fairy. But I don’t think that’s gonna happen. I really don’t. And I think that if people want the status quo, Senator Clinton’s your candidate. That’s what I believe.”

Posted by: Cindy | May 14, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

The Edwards endorsement says very loud and clear that he is with the position of unity, and against the politics of division, racism and separation. Thanks in advance to a guy I supported in 2004.

Posted by: kravitz | May 14, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I’m glad to see someone has come to their senses. Edwards is no dum dum he can read the writing on the wall. Mrs. Clinton had better put her ego aside and work to ensure a democratic victory this fall.

Posted by: JBS | May 14, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Thats great news… I have always liked Edwards. Actually, I hope to see him as the running mate.

Posted by: Niky | May 14, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Hillary, run as an independent. The far left turned its back on Lieberman. But, you can win the middle and leave the extremes to Obama and McCain. True change. Go for the Gold

Posted by: William | May 14, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Whirlwind 24 hours.
Last night, a Democrat won in Mississippi.
(Many senior Democrats have said a Democrat could not win in the south).
Republicans have been panicking all day long. They are pointing fingers at each other and realize they are in big trouble for letting Bush run America into disaster.
Today, Edwards endorses Obama.
Wow!!!

Posted by: Debbie | May 14, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Actually Vanessa, Edwards isn’t a superdelegate.
It’s still good news though.

Posted by: Brandon | May 14, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Edwards as a running mate??? That’s funny.. he couldn’t even deliver his own state of North Carolina in 2004. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH!

Posted by: Ann | May 14, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

You gotta give it to Obama; Slowing constricting Clinton with superdelegates into conceding.
She picked up 20 delegates in WV, but Obama has gotten 30 superdelegates over a week.
Even Clinton has to know, she’s starting to look like a hamster running on the circular wheel full speed but going nowhere.

Posted by: Common Sense | May 14, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Yay: Edwards is refusing to be a “New Hill-Billy,” pandering to the ignorant by their willingness to “obliterate” Iran and making false promises to eliminate the gas tax!

Posted by: Susie | May 14, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I knew this was coming. Of course it is big news! How can the CLinton adviser dismiss this endorsement. This will help Obama win over those on the fence and will help him win more blue collar votes. He has a huge lead in Oregon. What will Hillary say-that those white voters don’t count?That Oregon is not an important state?

Posted by: Maria Hopgood | May 14, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

It doesn’t matter, this soon to be former Democrat wouldn’t vote for Obama if the Easter bunny endorsed him. The party has been hijacked and I’m out after a lifetime of being a Democrat. If not Hillary, then it’s McCain for me.

Posted by: kitty | May 14, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

I sill remember Edwards was the campaign dog for Obama during the debates. The loser usually likes to unite another one to fight with the opponent rather than fighting singly.
I think the campaign gets to personal.
I think those high profile Obama backers’s psychology is like this:
they will feel disgraced if a woman wins, and reaches the goal they can never reach, so they would rather to endorse a weaker one.
Very simple, and pitiful reason behind.
They should be responsible for the country’s history. They should feel guilty that, their choice is not to put the country first, but is to put their own grace first.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | May 14, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Obama just picked up another super delegate from WI!!!! Senator Lena Taylor:)

Posted by: whatever | May 14, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

It would certainly be the best news the Clinton camp had during this whole campaign if he endorsed her.
What crybabies.

Posted by: Common Sense | May 14, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Amazing how many are still in denial.
If you are a Democrate, then your concern ought to be uniting around the Democratic Nominee to avoid another 4 years of failed BUSH politics in Washington: War in Iraq, Economy in recession, Tax cuts to the wealthiests, high gas price, ….
Democracy has worked and OBAMA is the Democratic Nominee.
Edwards releases his 19 pledged delegates… not a surprise that they will back OBAMA.

Posted by: JohnS | May 14, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

McCan’t and all the cynical, disgruntled Clinton losers will be standing on an island all alone looking at each other saying “What Happened?”
It wasn’t supposed to be like this!
OBAMA/EDWARDS 08

Posted by: Common Sense | May 14, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Obama / Edwards is the real dream ticket of 2008. Both have the character and leadership to bring some integrity back to D.C.
McCain / Anyone is a lobbyist dream ticket.

Posted by: Leslie E. | May 14, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Now, its time for Hillary to snap out of it and get behind Obama.
She’ll pop into formation next week.

Posted by: Common Sense | May 14, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Edwards joined the loser club along with Richardson. Now Obama can give all his millions to the party it’s what they were interested in all along. They can all be happy together losing to McCain in the fall. Go McCain!

Posted by: kittyCat | May 14, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

so every democratic losing contender has come on board: ted kennedy, edwards, kerry, bradley, hart….oops, still waiting on carter and gore. then it will be final: obama will have the endorsement of every democrat who lost a presidential bid since 1964, while Clinton will have the endorsement of the only democrat to win two terms since the 40s….lol. love the party of destruction.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Edwards probably has been in the bag all along, they just held off until they needed to defuse a big Hillary victory like last night. Obama and Edwards both make me sick, talk about your typical politicians playing the voters for fools! I think this may backfire and just make Clinton supporters angrier at Obama and push them further to McCain.

Posted by: dwc | May 14, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

I agree – Edwards shows his true colors – he’s just another egotistical, power hungry, opportunistic, hypocritical politician who can be paid off by any body. He’s spineless! Good riddance. Edwards said he was the working people’s candidate – but they sure didn’t vote for him! As we saw last night – working americans are voting for Hillary! and in big, BIG numbers.

Posted by: cc | May 14, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

I hope you people switching from Clinton to McCain realize that the next president will likely nominate two new Supreme Court Justices. One more round of conservative judges replacing the outgoing crowd and its bye-bye Roe v. Wade, along with a lot of other good, moderate jurisprudence.

Posted by: Hello? | May 14, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Good news for Obama to be sure – I don’t see how this endorsement is anything but a positive for the Obama campaign. However, it hurts to see that we democrats are so quick and ready to turn on each other in an instant. I can understand that each candidate has flaws and good qualities; but if you take an honest, unbiased look; their platforms are nearly identical. I’d be proud and happy to vote for either in November. I’m sick of the war, I’m afraid that Roe v Wade might be overturned, I want the economy to grow and restore this country as it used to be. Even if Clinton loses, she will certainly be assured a prized position (VP?) in determining the policy of the country if the Democrats win in Nov. I believe the same is true for Obama if Clinton wins. Seriously, I understand the enthusiasm but we should let this race play out and support the winner wholeheartedly.

Posted by: democrat08 | May 14, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

The Clinton camp continues to make the case that superdelegates are concerned about Obama’s loss in West Virginia and other swing states.
—————-
Well, I guess they just aren’t getting the message then. Not one super delegate has declared for Hillary since her WV win.

Posted by: Kate Henry | May 14, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Keep fightin’ Hillary! Edwards’ endorsement means nothing…are we forgetting that he’s been on a losing ticket as a veep and dropped out of this race!!! Hillary’s fight is exactly what we need in the White House!! Just when Obama thinks she’s down…She wins again!!! GO HILLARY!!!

Posted by: gnh | May 14, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I’m still not going to be bullied into voting for Barack. New kind of politics..Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! With the oldest establishment in the country. The good ol’ boys club…Ha! Ha! Ha! This is hysterical! On to KY for another landslide victory!
Hillary 08′

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 14, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Obama got at least one today… her case doesn’t make much sense ..

Posted by: whatever | May 14, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

You gotta give it to Obama; Slowing constricting Clinton with superdelegates into conceding.
She picked up 20 delegates in WV, but Obama has gotten 30 superdelegates over a week.
Even Clinton has to know that she’s starting to look like a hamster running on the circular wheel full speed but going nowhere.

Posted by: Common Sense | May 14, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

atl76 — please dont try to preach to me about what a “real” democrat would do. i have been voting dem since ’84 — when i first reached 18. sorry, you have no standing to define what it means to be a real dem.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

the hard facts — great analysis. obama supporters are using scare tactics to get clinton supporters on their side. amazing. but all along, when we were complaining of disparate treatment, they said that we were whining and that clinton is a racist and that they couldnt wait for her to lose. if clinton is so evil, why do they want her supporters? why do they want her to campaign for obama? perhaps they were lying about clinton all along — just to get obama elected.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

kate- it doesnt matter what the super-d’s do. obama wont win because we clinton supporters will give HIM the finger in november. good bye obama. lol. the dems lose again. what’s new?

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Not GOOD NEWS??? If it was for Hillary they would be turning back flips…

Posted by: Lawrence | May 14, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Lots of Independents don’t have to worry about being called a traitor. We’re going to vote McCain over Obama anyday. Too bad there was no way to exit poll all the Indepepndents who weren’t able to vote in the primaries.

Posted by: Kitty | May 14, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I wish these Clinton supporters would get so angry, they become speechless.

Posted by: Stophatein08 | May 14, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

It may not be “great news”, but it should have been expected. Hillary shouldn’t have expected such a far-left person as Edwards to endorse a moderate (Hillary). He is naturally going to gravitate toward someone with similar politics… the politics of Socialism. Yes, I know Hillary wants to “socialize” medicine, but America’s medical system NEEDS to be regulated. This doesn’t mean the entire company needs to adopt a Robin Hood policy, as espoused by Edwards and Obama. I’ve contributed to Hillary’s campaign three times; I guess I’d better make it four.
DON’T give up, Hillary!

Posted by: Rhys | May 14, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Minnesota1 — just because the DNC pays you to post, doesnt mean we have to jump on board. The “real” enemy is the DNC. I’m not voting for Obama. sorry.
Obama-nation – just because you lack cojones to take a stand and instead just preach the same drivel we hear everyday, does not make us shameful. lol. i think opposing sexism and elite democratic bigotry is more important than getting a dem in office. How about this: Not just any DEMOCRAT, please!

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

i’m sick of hearing obama talking about change. He has done nothing for Illinois. I have not heard what or how he’s going to change Washington. No one person can promise that. You can’t get 600 people (congress) to agree on anything. The democrats control congress now and they’ve got anything done since they’ve been in. So much for their promises

Posted by: louise | May 14, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

“Last night, a Democrat won in Mississippi.
(Many senior Democrats have said a Democrat could not win in the south).”
Well that’s stupid – Louisiana has a Dem senator. And there are Dem members of the House and Senate from the South.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I’ll be honest. I don’t like Hillary, for a lot of reasons that her defenders would definitely debate. It’s a pretty strong dislike.
But I would NEVER vote for McCain. Ever. Even if the nomination was taken from Obama, as some Clinton supporters claim the nomination is being taken from her.
I would vote for health care. And education. And stopping this travesty of a war.
Isn’t that more important than personality?
Don’t vote for a candidate that most analysts have as being *very* similar in position to Clinton? In order to vote for McCain?!?
That’s just nuts.
Can anyone taking this position please explain?

Posted by: Ben C | May 14, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

No, it’s not just about “electing the first black President” as “Get Real” said. It is also not about blindly following orders from the Star Chamber about who to vote for. Remember, the Democratic party bosses and their puppets are entitled to an opinion, but it’s worth no more than yours and mine. And each of those dictatorial goons gets ONE vote, the same as each of us does. This entire procedure stinks; how about letting the American PEOPLE vote. The DNC should shut up. I am STILL for Hillary; I don’t care what Howard Dean or John Edwards say. I just don’t understand why they’d prefer that I vote for Old Man McCain, but I will if Obama is the nominee.

Posted by: Rhys | May 14, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Ben C, it’s not about personality; it’s about politics. My wife and I will vote for McCain if we cannot vote for Hillary Clinton, simply because we don’t feel the need to take America as far to the left as Bush has taken it to the right. Hillary Clinton is the closest thing to a moderate as we’re going to see this year, which makes her the least scary. Old Man McCain is such a mixture of politics that it’s hard to figure where he will “land” on any given day. But he is still a moderate compared to Bush (and Obama).

Posted by: Rhys | May 14, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

lol – you people telling us to “get real” or “accept the inevitable” need to take your own advice: we are not voting for obama. lol. let that reality sink in.
and for those of you who question our party loyalty – lol. i’ve voted dem in every election – state, local, and national since ’84. i thought the party stood for my values. but i dont believe in sexism, unequal treatment of candidates, disparaging loyal democrats, like the clintons, distorting history to make candidates look bad, media snowjobs, and calling uneducated voters bigots. sorry – you lost my vote and every day it just gets worse. i am not turning back.
ps: before you call me a racist – i’m black. lol. this is too rich. i started predicting the dems would lose in december. now it’s looking certain.oh well. i guess it’s clinton in 2012…..

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

John Pen: ….and how many states did Obama win in a row before that? Hmmm?

Posted by: bobb | May 14, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

No one believes ANYTHING the Clinton campers say anymore. Why bother even reporting it?

Posted by: Brian | May 14, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

many Americans will simply not vote for Obama no matter who endorses him. Many Americans continue to feel Obama is too liberal, too unpatriotic, too shady, and too unexperienced to be President. Slowly the DNC party realizes Obama is not electable in a general election…but it will be too late..just ask Kerry.
Posted by: The Hard Facts |
ALSO GEORGE MCGOVERN WHO HAD THE SAME AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTERS AND 19 YEAR OLD COLLEGE KIDS AS OBAMA.
BY THE WAY MCGOVERN LOST 49 STATES OUT OF 50……SAME AS OBAMA WILL LOSE.

Posted by: John Pen | May 14, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Sour grapes is not becoming.

Posted by: Merhoba | May 14, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

So…..those of you that won’t vote for Obama…..do you think Hillary can win without the people who voted for Obama?This trashing of the other candidate of the same party simply destroys your candidate’s chances of winning as well. This is INSANE. If this is how the Democrats treat each other and lose what would otherwise be a shoe-in election YOU DESERVE WHAT YOU GET! What idiots

Posted by: Mayday | May 14, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Two more losers left Gore and Carter and any one over thirty see wright thru Edwards slime.

Posted by: Bishop | May 14, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

John Pen, your analysis is pretty good, except you’re forgetting that the Republicans have nominated a “clunker” this year. Old Man McCain is NOT the best the GOP could have put forth; he is a mixed bag of political views, which change on an almost daily basis.
I do agree, however, that by November the American people will have figured out Obama and won’t want to vote for him. But it will be too late, and we may get stuck with him. Hillary is our only hope, but members of the Star Chamber (the DNC) are doing everything in their power to destroy her.

Posted by: Rhys | May 14, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

tony,
I’m also Black and feel the same as you about the way this election process has gone. Isn’t it just sorry how the Democrats can find a way to lose every presidential election because of the stupidity of the DNC. This year however they have the Media to help them, just to get the “biggest story” of the century – “US Elects A Black President”. This is just like the movie “Wag the Dog” where reality is what the media says it is. Not for me. I still believe in substance not fluff. And Obama is the “Fluffiest” I’ve ever seen. Talking about “entitlement”!! Does he think America “owes” him something just because he’s black? Try someone more worthy like Colin Powell who has a ton more experience and more class than Obama.

Posted by: Get Real | May 14, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Obama Nation — keep dreaming! The fact that you cannot accept the fact that people cannot legitimately withhold support from the Lord Obama is pretty pathetic.
Rhyms – yes, I am black – and not supporting Obama or the Dems in ’08…a lifetime Dem.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

maria hopgood – how can this endorsement help him with blue collar whites when they didnt even vote for edwards himself???? strange logic.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Yes, OBAMA NO, yes. I couldn’t have said it better myself. Sadly, Obama’s supporters will probably scroll right past.

Posted by: Kitty | May 14, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Mayday, you’re overlooking the fact that some of us vote for the PERSON, not the party. In my 69 years, I have voted for Republicans and Democrats, almost equally. I honestly don’t care which party a candidate belongs to if I agree with most of his/her political philosophies. At the moment, there are still three viable candidates, and Hillary would be my choice if I could vote today. But if she is taken away by the party bosses in their “smoke-filled room”, then I will vote for my second choice, John McCain. You shouldn’t assume that everyone votes a straight party ticket.

Posted by: Rhys | May 14, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

kitty – that article was written by a black political science professor at the university of pennsylvania.
Get real: I am actually embarrassed that blacks were so unquestioning about Obama. IF anything we are open to questions, but with Obama, it will get you cut. What exactly did he do to deserve such heightened protection?

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

John Pen~
Those special elections loses are starting to burn, huh? MS-01 must have been especially hard to swallow. But hey, you guys had it in the bag… Just like ol’ man McCain.
The times, they are a changing.

Posted by: interlocutor | May 14, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Everytime the People pass on BO, he trotts out another endorsement. Something about this just stinks to high heaven. I think the whole thing is fixed.

Posted by: A reader in Georgia | May 14, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

I’ll be honest. I don’t like Hillary, for a lot of reasons that her defenders would definitely debate. It’s a pretty strong dislike.
But I would NEVER vote for McCain. Ever. Even if the nomination was taken from Obama, as some Clinton supporters claim the nomination is being taken from her.
I would vote for health care. And education. And stopping this travesty of a war.
Isn’t that more important than personality?
Don’t vote for a candidate that most analysts have as being *very* similar in position to Clinton? In order to vote for McCain?!?
That’s just nuts.
Can anyone taking this position please explain?

Posted by: Ben C | May 14, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

In the end, the DNC as well as Obama and his supporters, will reap what they have sown.
For sure, their harvest will be very, very bitter…
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08

Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 14, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

yeah
the clinton people on here…it’s just sad…just …sad.
It’s like watching one of those episodes of “intervention”
sad….
what the heck were you voting for the woman’s birthright or your country?
people are dying…children are suffering our country is getting less safe because of this war…
women’s rights are endangered by a Mccain supreme court selection process (no matter if we have a dem congress or not…it would be heavily effected by a vote for John McCain and by doing showing support for his policies…i.e. overturning roe)
It is asinine to go from Hillary to McCain unless you did not care about a single issue that is facing our country.

Posted by: dl | May 14, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

All this hostility is so unpatriotic. It doesn’t make sense to vote for McCain out of spite because your favorite candidate didn’t get noominated. It’s not about voting for Obama to unit the Democratic party.
The real choice is much more important than that. Vote for McCain if you want to continue the war and let it bankrupt our country. Vote for McCain if you want to watch our planet die and our economy go to pot because nothing is being done about our dependence on oil. Vote for McCain if you want Roe v Wade to be overturned.
I will vote for either Obama or Clinton because I don’t want my son or daughter to die in Iraq, I want my daughter to have a safe choice if she every has an unwanted pregnancy and I want our planet to survive because we have found sustainable energy.
Too bad emotions are getting in the way of logic.

Posted by: Arlane Margolis | May 14, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

All this hostility is so unpatriotic. It doesn’t make sense to vote for McCain out of spite because your favorite candidate didn’t get nominated. It’s not about voting for Obama to unite the Democratic party.
The real choice is much more important than that. Vote for McCain if you want to continue the war and let it bankrupt our country. Vote for McCain if you want to watch our planet die and our economy go to pot because nothing is being done about our dependence on oil. Vote for McCain if you want Roe v Wade to be overturned.
I will vote for either Obama or Clinton because I don’t want my son or daughter to die in Iraq, I want my daughter to have a safe choice if she ever has an unwanted pregnancy and I want our planet to survive because we have found sustainable energy.
Too bad emotions are getting in the way of logic.

Posted by: ProPsych | May 14, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Thank you John Edwards! The Clinton campaign can try to spin this, but it has overshadowed Hillary and WV. Did you see the MSNBC guys laughing and laughing about this a while ago??? LOL.

Posted by: Andi | May 14, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

I think the timing is really poor if they are trying to heal the democrat party. It looks more like the men are just bullying the ladies (sweeties).

Posted by: jeff | May 14, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I hope the people here saying they will vote for McWar if Hillary doesn’t win understand the gravity of that choice: TRILLIONS more debt, more DEAD soldiers needlessly in Iraq, more tax cuts for billionaires and corporations at the expense of the middle class, no healthcare, more extreme right supreme court justices, ruined environment, more loss of our national honor, loss of Constitutional freedoms, and on and on…
This is not a game people. I’m sorry your candidate isn’t winning, but suck it up. McBush will be a DISASTER for America. No joke.

Posted by: Patriot | May 14, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

I Just have one question for all of the Clinton supporters here who declare their intention to vote for McCain if Obama gets the nomination.
If by some miracle Mrs Clinton gets the nomination do you think she can win if the Obama supporters adopt the same position you now have?
Before you all attack me I will just like to point out that I am currently a Clinton supporter and I have voted twice here in New York for Mrs. Clinton.
I will suggest to all here that you think carefully about putting your country in the hands of McCain for a third Bush term.

Posted by: JJane | May 14, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

mykle — great job. you are just egging us on. thanks. insulting my intelligence is not a good way of persuading me to change my mind.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

JJane — I have thought more about remaining loyal to a party that endorses media bias, that bashes loyal dems, that treats older people as inherently biased and uncreative, that views a presidential election as an episode of american idol, that has men going around embracing sexism, while they complain about racism – real or imagined. sorry. there are other principles besides voting for a dem. i have never voted repub. earlier i was just going to vote dems for everything and leave the prez slot blank. now, i’m leaning towards voting for mccain. it will help him out in my swing state (fla).

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Let’s face facts – when a person says they are a life long Democrat but if Obama wins the nomination they will vote for Mccain, they are either stupid, racists or both! You can’t explain that stupid logic to me no matter how long you try. I wanted Hillary, but I am not stupid enough to vote against my economic interests that would be just plain stupid. It’s no wonder that the politicians and pundits play the race card it works on the unintelligent amongst us! geesh!

Posted by: julescator | May 14, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Lou if you hate pandering they you must just hate Clinton! lol lol And McCain is the worse. He is a dem one day in front of one crowd and a gop the next. Even the Repubs think he’s nuts. It appears that you will have to cut off your nose to spite your face again and NOT vote. Good luck with that!

Posted by: julescator | May 14, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

John Pen – the Dems must lose. They are trying to break a record for the number of losses in a 60 year period!

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

I am a candidate on the Democratic party in Idaho and I will support whoever the nominee is. We Democrats must stick together to defeat McCain in the fall. Our country cannot tolerate another 4 years of Republican misrule. I commend Edwards on his choice and remind you that it is time to take the Presidency! The time is now. The country and the world cannot wait. Vote Democrat!

Posted by: Debbie Holmes | May 14, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Emily’s right. And in other news from Hillaryland, did you hear that NARAL is full of traitors who will no longer be classified as women as of today’s endorsement, that the 32 states who voted for Obama no longer count as part of the USA, that votes from voters under 40 will be counted negatively against Obama’s total popular vote, that the 1.5 million people who donated to Obama are all oil company lobbyists who stole money from elderly women to give to Obama, and that anybody who lives in a caucus state is a communist.

Posted by: Scott | May 14, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Lots of bitter Hillary supporters here. I knew it was over for Hillary when the “Hillary Nutcracker” went on sale for half-price. Obama 2008!!!

Posted by: pt | May 14, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Barack in Kentucky,
It’s not surprising. He and his followers already thinks he’s the second coming of Christ.

Posted by: Get Real | May 14, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Tony, The next president of these United States of America will have a perhaps once in a lifetime chance to make appointments to the supreme court that will last for decades. McCain very recently stated that he will appoint judges just like Bush did. Do you Tony and the other Clinton supporters want that to be a part of the legacy you leave?
I will have to admit that prior to coming to this site I naively assumed that the supporters of Mrs. Clinton like myself were good people but I am seeing a great deal of racist, comments coming from some Clinton supporters here. I see a lot of the Rush Limbaugh and others of the lunatic right crap being spouted here.
MOST OF ALL AND INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH I SEE THE SAME THINGS THAT WERE SAID ABOUT BILL CLINTON IN HIS UPSTART campaign being said about OBAMA.
Like I said before I am a Clinton supporter and I see her simply being bested by a better run campaign. She made too many early mistakes. It is my hope that it is not too late for here, but, TONY the future our kids and generations of ours too come is too important to place it in the hands of McCain.

Posted by: JJane | May 14, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

anyone who thinks that us hillary supporters care about edwards endorsement have got another thing coming.
richardson was a judas and we didn’t care about his endorsement; and, edwards just waited to see which way HE THINKS the wind is blowing then hooks up his horse – we do not care about him either! if we care about either of theirs worthless politicians then we would have voted for them before.
if the DNC thinks they are going to force obama on us and that we will take another jimmy carter then they will be sorely surprised!
if these new dems don’t see that hillary is the best then fine – they will soon feel the cold cold cold hand of the gop!
now, we can start talking about being a little bitter – and it will NOT go away – choose wisely!!!!!
obama is a charlatin for change.
hillary is the smart choice for change.

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

julescator – no wonder people view dems as elitist. just look at your post. you are a typical snob and a hypocrite. blacks and latinos have the lowest level of high school and college education, but they are dems. if education related to “smart” voting, then the repubs would have the claim for the smartest voters. think before you bash poor folk, ok….

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

I know many people (middle class white men and women primarily) who supported Hillary and who have told me they will vote for Obama should he be the candidate. So, I’m not sure who the people on these blogs (and they’re on all the blogs)really are, because the real life people I know are making this decision about what they think would be best for their families and their country, and it doesn’t turn out to be McCain.

Posted by: ProPsych | May 14, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

oh geez!
i just looked at the ky flyer!
why do we know about “rev” wright? because obama pointed his finger at him and said “look at him, HE lead me to christianity!” anyone who thinks that obama didn’t use that loco is crazy themselves.
hillary helped get obama elected. naral was basically there at their creation and then they endorse obama. all liberal traitors to the democratic party – these people are the reason that NO democratic president has held 2 terms since Bill Clinton since, who was it, roosevelt!
these “dems” need to create their own party for liberals because i will never never never never never never, did i say never, vote obama!
DNC – give us obama and we will give you the biggest upset you have ever seen!

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

I am convinced that many of the folks posting here as disgruntled Clinton supporters who will vote for McCain if Clinton fails to get the nomination are actually Republicans. I followed a link in above, and it took me to absolutely the most disgusting Republican web site. There is absolutely no way a true supporter of Mrs. Clinton would be subscribing to such a site or sending anyone to it.

Posted by: JJane | May 14, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Talk about “wagging the dog.” Obama loses by 40 points yesterday and believes if he rolls out John Edwards, America will forget. Too bad America has seen this kind of politics for the last 8 years from the GW white house and can see these kinds of tricks from a mile away.
Nice try Obama.

Posted by: Jerome | May 14, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

What if McCain comes out against the Iraq war and offers a closeout solution before November?
McCain could take Obama’s #1 issue right out from under him.
If you all think it won’t happen, take a look at Nixon’s “Secret Plan” of 1972.
I was a 20 year old campaigner and voter for McGovern and I couldn’t believe that anyone would reelect Nixon. But, GUESS WHAT?
All it would take is McCain to announce an end to the occupation in Iraq and it would be ALL OVER!
Wise up Youngsters… you don’t have EVERYTHING figured out!

Posted by: Bill Lynch | May 14, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

If this was fixed the world’s media would be in on it not just this nation. The republicans would be in on it. All of Congress would be in on it…the justice department would be in on it…so oh please!!!! Obama is ahead fair and square.
Gee Whiz…Little Losers think big loser thoughts. lol

Posted by: Tia | May 14, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Wow, even Edwards is trying to stomp out the PEOPLES right to choose. Why have primaries at all, if someone in the “force” is just going to step in and stop it. Bully politics. Hillary all the way for me, I hate bullies.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

I’m don’t think Edwards endorsement will make any difference for the elections. He has become fairly irrelevant. I’m very sorry that I voted for him in the Primary.

Posted by: kate | May 14, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Ah, Khrutch…Now we get to the REAL reason people are upset on this board. Racism is alive and well, even if the Democratic Party, sorry to say. Living next door to WV, I can assure you that was the reason for Hillary’s landslide. It wasn’t a pro-Hillary vote. It was an anti-Black vote. Pure & simple.

Posted by: Jeanne | May 14, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

We should take the Clinton campaign’s word on how to assemble an electoral college victory. They started with a 2:1 money and a 20+ year name recognition advantage in January 2008, yet got their rear-ends handed to them by Feb 20th, and now we are to listen to them on how to manage political campaigns. The chutzpah of it boggles the mind. Obama has a well-oiled machine that is only going to get better by November.

Posted by: ColinSF | May 14, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Emily said:
“Edwards is yet another opportunist in the same old loser club, latte-left tradition as McGovern, Mondale, Kennedy, Dukakis, and Kerry. Nothing new here.”
So could some conservative explain to me what exactly it is about lattes that infuriate conservatives so much? It’s coffee and milk. Is it the steam that bothers you so much?

Posted by: John from CA | May 14, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Jeanne, I have been waiting for someone to tell it like it is here. WV is probably the most backward state in the country, however, I still have hopes for them that they can get it right in November. Obama 2008!!!

Posted by: pt | May 14, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

There is one clear winner and it isnt Hillary Clinton.
Obama is the winner.
Clearly and fairly.
You dont play one on one baskteball with someone and all of a sudden grab a tennis racket.
The game was played and won by Obama. Nothing else should be said sorry

Posted by: Ben | May 14, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Kate, I was glad to read your post. When I heard this on the radio the first thing that I remembered was; “Yeah, he had to drop out because he was far, far behind…” I also remembered the “Gang-up” in the debates. Edwards, after being criticized, ganged up on Obama with Hillary once. Only to ask Obama to make his argument more clear. Oh yeah, ouch. I guess. Now this. An earlier post was correct; Edwards is an opportunist.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

WOW JULES,
VERY VALID POINT,
JULES FOR VP
MCCAIN SUPPORTERS ARE CLUELESS

Posted by: Ben | May 14, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

All this debate and drama will change when Hillary concedes and endorses Barack Obama… and it will happen soon enough.
She almost certainly will give the speech at the convention, announcing the next president.
Keep that in mind, because when the time comes, she and Bill will most certainly be on board, actively campaigning for Obama.

Posted by: Mark Kraft | May 14, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

hey propsych
- the people i know who were for obama before, still are but most of all the people i know are for hillary and the majority of them say they will vote for mccain if hillary is not our nominee
- now, you may be to young to know but i have never heard of so many people ever say something like this before ESPECIALLY that a dem would vote gop!
it goes against our grain! BUT WE WILL!
we would rather have a patriot than someone whose patriotism is questionable and whose wife if not proud of this country!
are you kidding me!
no hill, then mccain will win. mark my words!

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Obama is hopeful. We desperately need hope. Even if it’s just that he’s an aspiring speaker, I don’t care. He inspires me to be a proud American again. I haven’t felt that way for quite a long while – probably since I was a child and my parents took me to see President Kennedy.
If you can’t stomach the idea of voting for him for whatever reason, then don’t. I’m REALLY happy about this country’s future if he gets elected.

Posted by: TK Paul | May 14, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

McCain, most certainly will not win.

Posted by: lisa | May 14, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

jjane – i’m a civil rights lawyer. i know about the supreme court. but i have greater values. the only democrat to appoint a justice to the supreme court since 1964 was president clinton. he appointed ginsburg and breyer. but so-called “leftists” dismiss his adminstration. these are the people i went to law school with. they don’t care about poor people. they did not grow up poor and black like i did. i’m sorry. there are greater interests at stake than the supreme court. the dems need to shed their hypocrisy, and sometimes you have to make sacrifices in order to teach. now is the time. we could have easily had two clinton terms followed by two obama terms, but powerful men in the party joined powerful media figures and raised race as an issue to get blacks on board and then trashed bill and hillary. sorry – i am not going to condone this activity. you can if you want, but dont expect most of us to do so.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Isnt patrionism also being a community organizer working to better communities.
Isnt patrionism someone who unites the people of american for a common cause.
Isnt patrionism someone who wants to better the average american not the elite and wealthy?
Get SERIOUS people cause its time for change

Posted by: Ben | May 14, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Mark Kraft — Hillary has already winked to us by staying in. Get real! I am not so gullible to vote for Obama just because she gives a convention speech. That speech will be for 2012. Thanks.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Ben, the media CNN, MS/NBC and smaller affiliates provided positive campaigning for Obama, as though he were a rock star 24/7. Oprah and Barbara Walters. It’s WEIRD. Control of the media is a great advantage and yet half of the primary voters have made our choice known. Half of the primary voters support Hillary inspite of the bombarding Obama propaganda. It is because we know she is the most policy savvy candidate. To me, she is far more qualified.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

YES TONY!

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

She may be qualified but not for presidency. Her campaign is in the red, that shows bad fiscal resopsibility. Her experience was as a first lady not a president or vp. No one can tell me one constructive bill she passed as a first lady. And oh yeah, that senate position, not sure what she accomplished there cause, oh yeah, thats right she didnt accomplish anything. For al the Hillary supporters i want factual evidence as to why she is more prepared on day one as a president than obama. I want facts. If you can provide them I will support her instead starting tonight. But that wont happen cause there are no facts.
Please look at facts and once you do it will be Obama Time.

Posted by: Ben | May 14, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

ben — you apparently dont get it. our “protest” isn’t about the nomination. but obama will NOT win in november without us — and he won’t have us. we wont be bought out.

Posted by: tony | May 14, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Ben, she has proven to be far more knowledgeable than Obama during debates, which is why he has not wanted them. He also doesn’t need them because of the free? propaganda.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Clinton and her supporters are something else–every time Obama gets an endorsement they wanted and ACTIVELY sought after, it’s no big deal! Really, do they listen to themselves?? Just admit they wanted Edwards’ endorsement and they are mad/sad it went to Obama and stop trying to act like it doesn’t matter when everyone knows it does! Your candidacy for President is just about done Sen. Clinton–face the facts and get behind Obama so that we can win back the White House.

Posted by: getreal | May 14, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

tony, McCain won’t win even if some Hillary supporters vote for him. Even the republicans don’t like him. Consevatives stay home and other republicans will cross party lines. So you will just cancel each other out. A dem wins no matter what.

Posted by: lisa | May 14, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

I’m not surprised about the Edwards endorsement and I’m glad because Edwards is really well regarded among working people, Southerners and others that Obama needs. He is a good campaigner and has the kind of down home personality that Obama needs for balance. He is a genuine populist, which should be potent against the elitist image Obama may have gotten for himself.
I am wondering whether Gore is going to endorse at all. There are a lot of factors militating against endorsement — the Nobel Peace Prize, among other things. It would give Obama a lot of prestige by osmosis but it would also make Gore partisan and I don’t thing he wants to be that.

Posted by: Karen, New York | May 14, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Andrew, duh! I am a half black, Puerto Rican. I don’t buy into PROPAGANDA! Come on, look at all the POWER behind this guy. Money and fullforce media propaganda. Remember how in love they were with Bush? I don’t like it, it’s very creepy. Everyone knows it’s propaganda on a gargantuan scale. Protests take risks, I am all for protesting injustice, I am all for writing Hillary in if the Obama control center tries to rip this off.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Obama sure does have a lot of losers backing him.
I guess democrats never learn and that’s why the republicans control the whte house.

Posted by: s.b. | May 14, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I was praying hard for Edwards to support Hillary but he did not.
Elizabeth Edwards even supported Hillary’s health plan.
I wouldn’t even want to think what Al Gore would do.
You know that Hillary got most of the delegates from her recent win. But Obama got 30 delegate support this past week.
So it is really getting difficult for her. I think that she only has some chance if they have a revote in Florida and Michigan but it seems DNC does not want to change the silly rule they made in the first place and Obama does not want a revote because his camp knows that Hillary would do extremely well against Obama even in a revote.
I am disappointed with Jack Cafferty who has been poking fun at Hillary with his silly comments- he said that Hillary is the last guest at a dinner table who does not know when it’s time to go away.
I really hope that once all this is over there is a dream team – if Obama wins the nomination then Hillary’s supporters would want her to be on the second top spot and vice versa.
Edwards just said last week that he was not ready to endorse anyone and now Hillary gets this huge win and Edwards makes a complete turn and supports Obama. Like Carville said of Richardson he too is a Judas

Posted by: nazir | May 14, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Oh yeah, like I would be even remotely intimidated by the “education” of media talking heads. The ones who scare me, are the ones who have the real control over the media.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Tony, I do wholeheartedly agree with you that “there are greater interest at stake than the supreme court”. I am very puzzled however at how those interest are advanced only by the election of Mrs. Clinton even more perplexing is how the election of a Republican who is kowtowing to the right wing nuts of that party going to advance those interest.
I too am a black person, and as I have stated earlier I perhaps unlike you, have voted for Mrs. Clinton on two occasions. I have supported her run for the presidency, but I just do not understand why I must be of the opinion that her loss should be the end of my world.
Tony, the truth is that Mrs. Clinton has no one but herself to blame for where she finds herself now. She started this race way ahead of everyone else. She had a lot more money, more name recognition, and more party “bigwig” support. She and her advises blew it early in the campaign. That is the reality, I watched the campaign go through what was absolutely the most amateurish campaign ever. I cringed with the sniper nonsense, and other errors. I voted for her in New York in the primary (That vote incidentally makes it 3 times that I have voted for her.)
Tony everything you are now saying about it being or not being the time for Obama to run was said of Bill Clinton when he ran. I remember well how disgusted the establishment in the party were with this upstart governor from a small state. I can go on and on, but the bottom line is that I see no sense in a supporter of Mrs. Clinton throwing the election to McCain only because Mrs. Clinton does not get the nomination.
Obama is a democrat and is very much qualified to be president, I will vote for him if Mrs. Clinton does not get the nomination. I will like to suggest that all other supporters of her do likewise.

Posted by: JJane | May 14, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Nazir; DNC claims they were ready for the go ahead, but Obama stalled rather than approve it. He stopped the chance for a revote. This is his method of being “fair.”

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Obama trusted Hillary enough to help him get elected.
Him and you saying that she is not trustworthy only reflects your character – not hers.
That pus of nastiness is only coming from Obama supporters.

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Tony, you were a Civil Rights lawyer right?

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

JJane – Obama is not qualified to be president. Period.
Continually comparing Obama to Bill Clinton does not make him qualified. Period.
Obama is not JFK, Obama is not Bill Clinton, Obama is not Hillary, Obama is not anyone great from our historic democratic party – Obama is Obama…
…and that is someone that does not love this country,…
… Obama is someone who married someone who does not love this country, Obama is someone who has less than 3 years in the Senate for which 2 he has spent running to be president.
We have had a pot smoking coke head who was a loser and Obama has said he was too – we do not need that.
The only thing Obama has been good at is the caucaus system which is not representative of the popular vote.
Also, Obama is greedy and only cares about himself. No, I didn’t agree with him when he supported Wright BUT I did respect him! Now, I don’t even respect him! Obama threw Wright under the bus just like he did his grandmother – who took him in when he no longer wanted to live with his mother because she was on welfare – for who he continually uses his dead mother for like his life was sooooooo hard – give me a break – private schools, elementary on to university – yeah, tough.
Do you understand yet why I will be voting McCain if Obama steals this nomination?

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

tony, fyi I may be a Obama supporter but would definately vote for Hillary if she were the nominee. McCain won’t win because people are sick of republican rule. Look at the recent congressional elections that the republicans have lost in republican districts. lol Why is that. The tides are changing. Republicans are eating their own.

Posted by: lisa | May 14, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

I don’t want a legend or a this or a that in the oval office…I Do want a President a real honest to goodness President who can really get ahold of the mess we are in and lead the country out of it…still hoping one will show up before November…If a real candidate came forward they would probably be driven back into obscurity.

Posted by: lee | May 14, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Ben, you sound eerily similar to the Bush people when Gore and Kerry lost.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Davis – I understand that these sites are dominated by all you pus filled Obama supporters but don’t squirt your pimple at us because us Hillary supporters are here tonight. We do exist even if MSNBC, CNN, etc. tell you that we don’t.
By the way, WHY hasn’t Obama gotten this yet? O yeah, US!!!! hahahahahahahahahahahah

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

correction; When Gore got ripped off!

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

jozy -
i love the way you represent yourself.
just like an obama supporter.
ha ha ha

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Seriously, love your post.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

All the ridiculously angry rants here prove this is GREAT NEWS!
The UTTER FEAR in these comments is absolutely palpable. I love seeing all you weasels squirm.
A REVOLUTION is coming to this country and many of you will finally get fair medicine, by choking on your own bile.

Posted by: Benjamin F. | May 14, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I hope HRC runs as an Independent at least we will have someone worth voting for.

Posted by: TH | May 14, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Seriously – your right – listening to you is putting me to sleep – yawn…

Posted by: jozy | May 14, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

what I find very funny is Hillary supporters feel the need to come these blogs and say “I will never vote for Obama”, who cares, it’s not necessary to continue to go on blogs and say you are going to vote for McCain, come november go to the polls and vote McCain, the reason I believe you guys keep coming on these blogs is because you’re just upset right now, because like alot of you say, talk is cheap, don’t blog about it go to the polls and prove it, but either way who cares, and for the record all of you who are dogging John Edwards, how many habitat houses have you built and had he endorsed Clinton the same man would have been the greatest thing since Elvis. Get real people especially Tony Montana

Posted by: Rizz | May 14, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Benjamin F. – yes, this is great news because odumba thinks edwards is worth anything that he made such a big deal about it
he is so full of himself he didn’t even respect the people enough to campaign in w.v. – what’s not surprising? is that is it not surprising.
obama is full of himself and not love for this country.

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Rizz – you care
hahahahahahah

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

we’re supposed to take someone seriously when they don’t even have the respect to call another human being by his given name – way to go! I doubt seriously that you have ever served your country in any capacity other than being a total dipstick

Posted by: jozy | May 14, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Whew stick a fork in her she’s done
And as for a Obama /Clinton ticket, Why would Obama put his heartbeat between Hillary and the Presidency? If he did food tasters , a triple secret service detail and wearing Ironmans suit 24/7 would not keep him alive a year (just ask Vincent Foster oh thats right you cant)

Posted by: Paul | May 14, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

tony, I could say the same thing about Hillary supporters and their distasteful posts about Obama. I find them equally disturbing. Red states may remain red and blue may remain blue but I’m not so sure. But I think the swing states, not all, will go dem. The republicans are very dissatisfied with their own party. And it’s starting to show. Should be interesting.

Posted by: lisa | May 14, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

irma – thank you

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

“This is our moment to tear down that wall, to end this divide (and just TAKE IT, we’re the ones that matter)…blah, blah, balh…” paraphrasing Edwards.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Rizz, we sing the praises to EVERYONE who supports Hillary.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

This is a classic example of the media chopping up a statement to produce a different meaning. The Clinton adviser says: “Well, I don’t think it’s good news, but there’s a lot of news in this business and we move forward and move past it.” The quote is transformed into a defeatist “It’s Not Great News”.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 14, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Seriously, you are cracking me up!

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Hillraisers-
What exactly has Hillary Clinton accomplished that makes her so much more experienced and ready to take the oath of office?
What were her major accomplishments in the Whitehouse as first lady, healthcare? children’s education? international diplomacy? What hallmark legislation or change has she been responsible for in the last 16 years.
The only real measure we have to compare these two candidates against, truly, is their campaigning style, how they answer questions on their leadership qualities. What sense we get on their character.
With that, who has run a dirtier campaign, Obama or Hillary? Who has used more angles to try and angle a win, Obama or Hillary? Hillary has gone from Big States, to Electoral Votes, to Swing States to Popular Votes – all on the wrong side of the actual results, but all also “spin-able” to her agenda.
For the last three months, SDs have been breaking to Obama 2:1, pledged delegates roughly equal, yet she refuses to conceded to begin to help heal some of the divisions she is stoking on the campaign trail.
And yet you still support her, to the point you would not vote for her if she doesn’t win, well she not going to win! So are you really going to vote for McCain? Then you’re not really a Democrat – not that that’s wrong but stop pretending – your passions are blinding your judgement.

Posted by: Derek | May 14, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Believe you are STUPID Clinton is worth over 100 millions, McCain and his wife about 60 million oh yeah they are not elitist, I guess those titles only apply to the competition

Posted by: Rizz | May 14, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Rizz – but we are laughing now

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Yes hopesprings52, it’s that weird, overpowering, 24/7 propaganda by the media. All that power and money to influence the people to vote for a candidate that doesn’t compare to Hillary’s knowledge of policy, in a time when the mess Bush created needs to be undone. Hillary is the right candidate in this crucial time.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

lol, I don’t know why, I guess hope springs eternal

Posted by: Rizz | May 14, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Seriously even if you vote for McCain, he won’t win. And not all Hillary supporters will vote for him.

Posted by: lisa | May 14, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

John Edwards is a twit. He was never a real candidate (even in ’04) and I truly find myself annoyed whenever I hear him speak.
Anyways, I have no idea why Obama is grandstanding on this endorsement. Edwards’ support for him is nothing new.
Maybe John Kerry can give Obama some tips on how to debate.

Posted by: _Christopher | May 14, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

you guys do know that Hillary herself blew this election, in the early goings she surrounded herself with morons, who manage to bankrupt her campaign, if you guys remember she was the democratic pick and eveyone was behind her, now it time to look in the mirror I know that’s hard but it’s time

Posted by: Rizz | May 14, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

no not at all, I’m just making conversation, I’m not trying to convert anyone, I really don’t care who you vote for, so don’t get it twisted

Posted by: Rizz | May 14, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Edwards endorsement, the kiss of death for Obama. The sympathy factor for Clinton will sweep her to victory.
Everyone likes to champion the underdog, especially one who has repeatedly been shafted by the disloyalty of her supposed supporters and friends.
Edwards was too weak to continue his own bid for the presidency, how much weight can a turncoat’s endorsement carry.

Posted by: Bill Elliott | May 14, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Billie Elliot: YES!

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Sorry, I mean Bill.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Seriously please don’t call me a naive little girl when I am 53. How old are you. And please stop with the Wright, it is so childish. Go ahead and vote McCain, he won’t win.

Posted by: lisa | May 14, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

How easy it is to dismiss Edwards endorsement when he doesn’t endorse your candidate and therefore irrelevant.
Sadly the once solid Democratic Party has become fractured and if we don’t reconcile our differences we will lose the White House.
Hillary supporters keep saying that the nomination is being stolen from Hillary but she is losing based on her lesser delegate count, superdelegate count and popular vote. No she will not overtake him because, as in previous years before, the DNC does not count the vote from Puerto Rico and no, the DNC is not going to seat the delegates from FL or MI as they voted because ALL candidates signed an agreement that these two states broke the rules and the votes would not count. Now that she is losing, HRC and supporters are deamanding that the delegations be seated as they voted. This will never happen not because it’s a vast left-wing conspiracy to take or steal a nomination from her but because she agreed that it would not count.
Part of being a great leader is at the very least standing by what you say. If you suddenly change your for the mere reason that you are losing, this shows that you are without conviction and cannot be trusted. What does this say about all of those promises she has made during the campaign trail? Will she conveniently change her mind again when the moment suite her? This alone should give people pause before considering to vote for McCain instead of Obama. To do so out of spite is childish and will result in a catastrophic movement in our government that will not only restrict our reproductive rights but our civil liberites as well. If Clintons supporters choose McCain over Obama, please don’t flood the streets of DC to protest. I still need to get work.
Now the DNC will come up with a fair and equitable distribution of the delegates to all candidates. MI and FL will be seated, just not in the way she is DEMANDING.

Posted by: Jay | May 14, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

tony – you literally made me lol and i am still smiling as i wright (sorry) write this! lol!!!!!!

Posted by: Seriously | May 14, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Seriously, you’re more young at heart than childish:-)

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Hey tony .. did I hit a nerve there. Sorry

Posted by: Jan E | May 14, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

What happened to Seriously.

Posted by: lisa | May 14, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Jay, don’t tell me I don’t have conviciton. I have been a loyal volunteer to the Democratic party all my adult life. I don’t have to explain it to you. This is an unjust election you may claim any self righteous things you want. I will not accept forceful propaganda against half of the primary voters who are the long time core of the Democratic Party. We will stand against the injustice and with that there is always a risk worth taking.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Tony-
I’m saying you’re a child, or acting like one. What exactly are you trying to say?? What is your point??
That everyone who supports Obama is delusional, that registered Democrats are advancing the parties agenda by protest-voting Republican??
Make a point moron!

Posted by: Derek | May 14, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Goodnight Seriously and you too Tony! I really enjoyed reading your posts. You too Bill “Go Billy!”

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

What is your point then Tony? What exactly are you trying to say?
Don’t speak in innuendos when they’re not necessary. Are you trying to say that the campaign has been biased against Hillary? That the press has been slanted? That John Edwards is a phony, what exactly is it your trying to say.
Or perhaps your point is just to sling mud? Maybe that’s your gig – to basically just be a jerk!

Posted by: Derek | May 14, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Okay, one more. Gee I know Rizz; It’s as if all the black people were to vote for Obama, oh wait. Except for me, Black Puerto Rican…FOR HILLARY! Ok, goodnite.

Posted by: irma | May 14, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

William, You say, “Hillary, run as an independent”. I say, SHE HAS NO MONEY!!! Hillary is out!!!

Posted by: Zero | May 14, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

JJane, that’s a great point – , a woman’s right to choose could be at risk. 2 or maybe 3 supremes are going to be named in the next 8 years. This is a big election and we need to be unified.
Democrats support better ideals. Why is there such a rift!

Posted by: Derek | May 14, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Yes, Davis is foolish.

Posted by: Judy | May 14, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Tony,
remember Obama was raised by white folks not black folks, so the value and views that were instilled in him comes from white folks, so of course he’s going to seperate himself from wright, but my true belief is he don’t share the views of wright, forget the fact that his skin is a little dark, he was born to a white mother raised by white grandparents in hawaii of all places, however I grew up in inner city miami, so you better believe I share wright views, it all about what you’ve had to go through in this country

Posted by: Rizz | May 14, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

OOps, there appears to be many Davis’ here, yuk, I’m out. Scream all you want, Hillary people exist.

Posted by: Judy | May 14, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Tony-
There is no argument with you, you don’t listen to any point not in complete alignment with your own. I doubt you’re even reading the posts.
Again, you’re just an agitator – and frankly, an incoherent one.

Posted by: Derek | May 14, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

well tony, I don’t know who you are talking too because the black folks around me share my views, you know as well as I do, there’s no way Jesse Jackson would win Iowa or have 16 million votes

Posted by: Rizz | May 14, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

hey tony,
it’s been real, but i’m out

Posted by: Rizz | May 14, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

“If you are a Democrate, then your concern ought to be uniting around the Democratic Nominee” JohnS, excuse me??? You don’t need to tell any of us what to do or what a Democrat does. Obviously, you’re not Southern Baptist because no one tells a Southern Baptist what to do. We’ll tell you where to stick your concerns and orders where the sun don’t shine by voting McCain if Hillary is not the nominee.

Posted by: Drew | May 15, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

The democratic party has found a way to lose the general election again.
This time, it spells:
BO

Posted by: John_Lai | May 15, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Question for the Hillary supporters. If it were a shared ticket, would you vote for Obama-Clinton? Clinton-Obama? Or does it need to be Clinton-other.
Interested in your opinion.

Posted by: Derek | May 15, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

The faux uniter has managed to unite the losers of elections past. This is the change that we’ve been waiting for? I’ll keep waiting then.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Carol any dem will win against McCain.

Posted by: lisa | May 15, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Same warmed over far left agenda, that didn’t work 4 years ago and won’t work in November. Time to move closer to the center or lose half of the party.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Hey Tony,
Where’s your big comeback to the facts above???
Me and Millions of “thinking” American’s all over the country are so happy Hillary is almost gone and will never be in the white house again, for all the reasons I stated above in my last two posts…
In addition what kind of person in their right mind with any shred of integrity, would vote for a presidential candidate that stood up in front of the cameras and the world (on 4 different occasions) and BOLD FACE LIE ABOUT SNIPER FIRE IN BOSNIA?
What does that say about Hillary voters? It says to me No integrity, No education and a very POOR memory!!!
Just like you Tony, just like you….

Posted by: Davis | May 15, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

I think Tony is a Clinton campaign plant, but he stopped responding because the utility company cut the power at his local campaign office over back due bills.
Can’t blog by candle light can you!

Posted by: Derek | May 15, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Obama/Edwards
Now that’s the ticket!
McCain won’t have a chance.

Posted by: Dave | May 15, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

I think the kool-aid has given the Obama people amnesia. Does Kerry/Edwards ring a bell? The 2 losers from 4 years ago. I didn’t think the Democratic party could have a weaker candidate than Kerry, but they’ve proven me wrong. Time to re-shuffle the party and look for a backbone.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

…and the disaster is, somehow the Clintons then lost it all to the right-wingers. No, we don’t need that to happen again. Also, Hillary fought for the Democratic Party policies–fought her heart out. And she isn’t going to abandon her party. So why should her followers suddenly stop caring about what Hillary believes in if Obama is the nominee??? If they don’t vote for Obama if he’s the nominee, that would be a real slam on everything Hillary believes in. Another thing: It was over in February..in March..in April..in May.. Hillary would be better off to realize this and quit soon rather than end up having to face it later when all the superdelegates have left her for Obama..sometimes it is better to quit when you are at least still standing.

Posted by: Sallie | May 15, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

I’m NOT voting for “SWEETIE” Obama. What a sexist!

Posted by: Gloria | May 15, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

Edwards just bought a ticket on the Titanic.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | May 15, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am

Obama on Tuesday, guess I need some working class votes, Obama on Wednesday, I’ll get Edwards, that should fool them.
Hey check out my flag pin.
Want some more Kool Aid.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | May 15, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

That ticket would be very bad. But considering what hapened in 2004, nobody is that stupid to put him on another ticket. National security credintials are a must for the democratic ticket.

Posted by: T_Smith1314 | May 15, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

All you Clinton supporters, let me ask you one question. If Hillary does not get the nomination, do you think she will not vote or would rather vote for McCain? If the majority of her supporters feel that way, it does not reflect very good on your candidate. Remember, for every one of you who does not vote, there will be 5 new Obama supporters going in your place. Think about it……………

Posted by: SUNMAKER777 | May 15, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

All you Clinton supporters, let me ask you one question. If Hillary does not get the nomination, do you think she will not vote or would rather vote for McCain? If the majority of her supporters feel that way, it does not reflect very good on your candidate. Remember, for every one of you who does not vote, there will be 5 new Obama supporters going in your place. Think about it……………

Posted by: SUNMAKER777 | May 15, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

i amazing to me how soon we forget about
the job lose do to bill clintons nafta aagreement. i say all af the barack
suppport not vote and see if hillary
and bill could win the whitehouse
barack supporter. i for one will sit
this one out.

Posted by: catherine | May 15, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

we more jobs are taking over oversea are
we going to blame bush? bill clinton start this think he care about the working men and women of america? looking at the job lose do to nafta why do he think it good for america, or just good for him and hillary.

Posted by: catherine | May 15, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

His endorsement just means, if Obama and that is a big if, gets the nomination that he will lose in the fall and here is one reason why:
Women have been messed over for many years by the Democrat Party and it appears that millions of “US” will be returning the favor, should this primary continue on its current path. Hillary Clinton is clearly the best choice to be our current parties’ choice as the nominee for President. As a life-long Democrat (55), I find it unacceptable to tolerate just how my party has hosed their most loyal and largest voting block; women. I am confident the Democrat Party will pay a severe price for this blatant assault on us women. Cry all you want about this being “sour grapes” but, little good will result in your on-going efforts to unite Hillary’s staunch supporters around “your chosen candidate” and not the peoples. All the Democrat Party wants us to do now is get their selected, from the start, elite, wimp Barack Obama elected in November. It will be a cold day in hell before I do that and I hope Hillary Clinton walks away from this Party, as well. As with most of the women I have contact, as well as many men, are finished with the Democrat Party now and forever. Many of “US are starting a grassroots movement to assure these kind of sorry tactics employed by my now soon to be former party, favoring a man who clearly has no shot without her support to win over the best women who can win this on her own, will never happen again. Until the final results are in Democrat Party leaders, we will just have to wait and see how things turn out once this primary season comes to a close. I for one am changing my registration to Independent, if not Republican, on the same day that I vote for Hillary in Kentucky. Once all our votes are counted, if you the party leaders allow that to happen, you’ll just have to wait and see how deep this “bitterly disappointed” and highly ashamed of this blatant insult to women is across America. To do this to the largest voting block in America is truly, for my soon to be former Democratic Party, a travesty. Bye, bye now and good riddance from Mary L. O’Bryan, Louisville, KY, soon to be former Democrat, no matter what happens in the primaries left to come.

Posted by: moblou | May 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

“All I can say is, I don’t want to overdramatize it, but starting with Ohio the remaining superdelegates started really focusing on the 270 electoral vote issue and how do we best assemble that and it’s made a marked impression,” the senior Clinton advisor told ABC News.
I guess that’s why 99% of those who
have decided since then have pledged their support to Obama!
Get a reality check!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 15, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

This endorsement should open up the
floodgates for the super delegates to
put Obama over the top and end this
process!
Turn out the lights, the party’s over!
Time to go home Hillary and take
Bill with you!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 15, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

This is one Dem that will never vote for Obama & I know alot more. I care more about the country not the Dem party. Right now we dont need OJT in the whitehouse.

Posted by: Don Fl | May 15, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

one person one vote failed in the democracy proportional delegate process
and w/ florida and mich voters being disenfranchised in the millions well before the obama train wreck got its momenteum…
i can not say..democracy is safe and health in its birthplace in the modern world or era

Posted by: appalachianblue | May 15, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

if you think obama is such a unifying force and one who would stand up for this nation
check out what he did for his own granmother…
http://www.nelsonguirado.com/index.php/comiendo/c89/mob-marches-on-obama-s-grandmother-s-house

Posted by: appalachian blue | May 15, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

john from california…
its not conservatives who are put off by latte liberals [they lol at you]
…its those of roosevelt dems in
working class regions like pa and southern ohio and wva and ky and indiana and and and and who are very concerned for the true downtrodden and working classes of this nation
got milk?

Posted by: appalachian blue | May 15, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

tony the civil rights lawyers
i have much in common w/ you …i am one too only i’m white and worked w/ the clinton dept of justice
i agree totally…clintons were made out by very powerful media interests to be almost completely racists…nothing further from the truth
and as a civil rights lawyer i can tell obama NEVER was one nor was anything near a true legal advocate for the true oppressed…those of us who do this kind of work
don’t win major endorsements from fop police unions across the nation

Posted by: appalachian blue | May 15, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

If I saw someone that I deeply cared about behaving in a manner that could be ultimately detrimental to them, would it be accurate to say that I was not proud of their behavior, but I loved them anyway? Would that make me anti- them or a realist commenting on the behavior and not the person? If they changed, would I be wrong to be proud of them? My oldest son volunteered to go into the special forces and made the grade. He did not one day in his life, wear a flag pin… does that make him un-patriotic? Be glad,be very glad that you live in America, a country that allows you to speak freely… and speak you do. How many of you “arm-chair commentators” have or are seriously planning to run for public office? You are so quick to spout hate and judgemental diatribes. What is elite about a child, who comes from a single parent housewhole who, having been raised by grandparents dared to run for the highest office in this, the most powerful country in the free world? He had the audacity to try (and succeed) to get the best education that he could. He didn’t come from money and he didn’t marry money. He and his wife still have school loans to pay. So much for being “Elite.”
Where else but in America could a woman dare hope to be in the position to run for the highest office in a society that was and is male-dominated? Where else but in America could a woman rise above the filandering of her spouse (who happened to hold the highest office in the land), public humiliation, financial scandal and still be beloved by so many people? You, who name call and back bite among yourselves do both of these candidates a disservice. At least they had the guts to open themselves up to such awful scrutiny and run for office. You may feel that one is more qualified than the other and that is your right, but you will never know for sure how they will perform until they are in office. What you should know is that this country cannot afford four more years of republican mentality and the proof of that is in the performance of the present administration. Our favorite may not win the democratic nomination, but, given the minute differences in their positions, the nominee deserves our support. If you vote out of spite, you just might get more of the same. If that be the case, don’t whine and don’t complain. Know that it was your vote,your spite, your bias that enabled it. My son has done more than just sit back and critize…he is putting his life where his heart is. He is doing what he felt that he could do to bring about a change. I challenge those of you who make such astute observations from the safety of your pc’s to do something other than spout venom and meaningless rhettoric. Get off of your sanctimonious blogging behinds and make your local, state and national officials be accountable. Run for office insteaad of just running your fingers and your mouths. Channel that energy into something productive.
As for me, at 53 I’m back in school pursuing a degree in Psychology. I have a 4.0 and I ‘ve worked my ### off to get it. I’m going to get my doctorate (school loans and all) so that I can help fix a mental health system that is broken. Our troops need this support with the high instances of PTSD and trauma behind having limbs blown off by a people who hate us. This is what I can do.(Wouldn’t you hate a people that allowed their government to levy sanctions on food and chlorine which caused your children to die at a rate of 5000 per month because they could not purify the water or eat? This is what this administration did. That would be kind of like blowing up a building filled with innocent people to get back at the one who gave the order hummm…hurting people hurt people.) We need a gross revision in policy and a gross revision in mindset. What kind of example are we setting if we tear each other apart? How grown up we appear when we don’t know how to deal with disappointment. These blogs, for the most part indicate that we, as Americans, don’t even like ourselves. They reek of disrespect and intolerance… of a diseased character and small-mindedness… of the absence of a soul. Our children are watching us and they mimic what they see and repeat what they hear… and we wonder what would make our young people want to kill each other. This is what we are teaching them. The greatest teacher of humanity said ” Let he, who is without sin, cast the first stone.” The world is watching us. We are better than this. We know better and thus, we have a responsibility to do better. We are a people to whom much has been given, and therefore, much is required. We take so much for granted, but only in America do we have the right to do so. Only in America… Stop the madness, drop the rocks, breathe, re-focus… let’s get our act together.

Posted by: drroz | May 16, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Edwards didn’t even get out of the starting bloks in this race! Why would his endorsement carry so much weight now?!
That is pure wishful thinking on Obama’s part (and I suspect sour grapes on Edwards part, because Hillary is not weak, as he stated in NH, she is strong focused and determined).
Super del’s must be asking why Obama cannot win swing states. It has to be acknowledged that (whether it’s appreciated or not by DNC)the states won so far by Obama will revert to GOP in the GE and Obama cannot win the states that Hillary has, making Hillary the more electable and definatly capable of whiping the floor with McCain, to become the next President! So quit your messing ABC and show the lady the real respect she deserves!
FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT! GO HILLARY!!!

Posted by: Di | May 16, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Something else I just discovered today…the latest mathmatics:
http://12counts.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/why-obama-wont-count-the-votes-hillarys-winning/
Obama, you and your campaigners are cheating!

Posted by: Di | May 16, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.