May 21, 2008 4:50pm

Clinton Demands Florida, Michigan Votes Count

ABC’s Eloise Harper reports: In her most emphatic argument yet for counting the votes in Michigan and Florida, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, traveled Wednesday to Palm Beach County, Florida –- ground zero for hanging chads and the vote-count controversy of the 2000 election.

Clinton argued for including Michigan and Florida’s delegates in the selection of a party nominee, as well as counting the popular vote in those states. She argued that the popular vote tally should determine the election outcome, instead of the delegate count.

Watch the VIDEO HERE.

“We believe that the outcome of our elections should be determined by the will of the people. Nothing more. Nothing less. And we believe the popular vote is the truest expression of your will. We believe it today just as we believed it back in 2000 when right here in Florida you learned the hard way what happens when your votes aren’t counted and a candidate with fewer votes is determined the winner.”A

And today, Senator Barack Obama’s campaign showed a glimmer of compromise on the Michigan and Florida delegate controversy. Obama’s chief strategist David Axelrod told National Public Radio’s All Things Considered: “We are open to comprise.  We are willing to go more than half way.  We’re willing to work to make sure that we can achieve a compromise.  And I guess the question is: is Senator Clinton’s campaign willing to do the same?”

The Democratic Party boycotted the Florida and Michigan primaries when those states moved up the dates of their primaries against the wishes of the Party, disrupting its intended primary calendar.  Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill, honored that boycott and did not campaign in those states; Obama’s name did not even appear on the Michigan ballot.

But Clinton now says she wants to see those votes cast in Florida and Michigan counted. “I believe the Democratic Party must count these votes. They should count them exactly as they were cast. I am here today because I believe the decision our party faces is not just about the fate of these votes and the outcome of these primaries. It is about whether we will uphold our most fundamental values as Democrats and Americans.”

“Each of us should have an equal voice in determining the destiny of our nation.  A generation of patriots risked and sacrificed lives on the battlefield for that ideal,” Clinton said.

Clinton then called on her opponent to join her in demanding that Florida and Michigan be counted.

“I believe that both Senator Obama and myself have an obligation as potential Democratic nominees — in fact, we all have an obligation as Democrats to carry on this legacy and ensure that in our nominating process every voices is heard and that every single vote is counted.” 

Making the comparison to the Florida recount during the 2000 election, Clinton said “The lesson of 2000 here in Florida is crystal clear. If any votes aren’t counted the will of the people isn’t realized and our democracy is diminished.”

Clinton also referenced the court decision that ended the 2000 recount quagmire: “Your Supreme Court said it’s not about the technicalities or about the contestants it’s about the will of the people and whenever you we can understand their intent it should govern. Well it’s very clear what the 1.7 million people intended here in Florida.” 

Clinton received more votes in Florida, when it held its primary election. However, since both candidates boycotted the race and did not campaign there, it is unknown how many voters skipped going to the polls that day.

Clinton appealed to the local audience saying, “The fact is the people of Florida voted back in January you did your part you showed up in record numbers and you made informed choices but today some months later you still don’t know if these votes will help determine our party’s nominee. You still don’t know if this great state will be represented at our convention in August. It is time you knew. because the more than 2.3 million people who voted in Florida and Michigan exercised their fundamental American right in good faith.” She continued, “You did not break a single rule and you should not be punished.”

Clinton explained that she does not agree with critics who argue she is changing the  late in the game. “Some say that counting Florida and Michigan would be changing the rules. I say that not counting Michigan and Florida is changing a central governing rule of this country.”

User Comments

If you believe in Jeffersonian democracy, then, an election is determined by majority by the principle of one person one vote.

Posted by: lazy to think | May 21, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Obama has already beaten her, and he will do it with one state tied behind his back.

Posted by: Mike D | May 21, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Hillary Clinton agreed to
disenfranchise both states before
the primary season began!
She can’t have a do-over now!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 21, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Don’t count Fl. and Mi. and see if he wins and thier are the women who he seem to forget about but we will not forget.

Posted by: Bishop | May 21, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

See, there’s one little known fact that the nasty/sexist political commentators keep forgetting about: Clinton’s need not play by the rules; they can change them whenever it serves their purpose, and there is no limit as to how audacious it may be to the other players or the common sense of the American people…

Posted by: dlp | May 21, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

See, there’s one little known fact that the nasty/sexist political commentators keep forgetting about: Clinton’s need not play by the rules; they can change them whenever it serves their purpose, and there is no limit as to how audacious it may be to the other players or the common sense of the American people…

Posted by: dlp | May 21, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Hundreds of years? That I know of, she’s the first woman to run for president. Okay… anyone can be a “monster”–men or women. Annie Oakley??! Did you prefer to use “Indiana Jones” or “GI Joe”?? Glen Close character? So what, let’s argue the racist bid then…? Hasn’t Obama been the target of racism??

Posted by: noemi in los angeles | May 21, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

This is pretty easy really. Hillary just stays in the race until early June, at which time, the superdelegates will be obliged to weigh in. They will of course weigh in heavily and overwhelmingly for Obama. Then, after the nomination is confirmed by the DNC rules, the great states of MI and FL can be awarded as many delegates as the DNC deems fair, split, as is, one-half, etc. No doubt FL and MI will proudly represent in Denver. Why all the hot air from HIllary today in FL? She doesn’t want to count all the votes, or she would be adding in the large number of votes cast in caucus states too. Why not?Not to worry! It’s so easy, and all this wretched hand-wringing and pleading on HIllary’s part is so unnecessary and pathetic. You can’t just change and make up some new rules to steal an election. We’re not that stupid.

Posted by: Jan | May 21, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Obama has not won the election even if he stands on his head and eats a banana. Hillary has won the popular vote regardless of what the party says and If she does not win then John McCain.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

To those who say Obama needs Hillary’s supporters to win? Yup, true story.
Do you think Hillary might need Obama’s supporters to win?
Now let me ask you this, do you think she will get Obama’s supporters? I wouldn’t count on those poll results that have said only about 20% of his supporters would not vote Hillary.
It matters how this thing is won to both sides. It just does.

Posted by: WORKS BOTH WAYS | May 21, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

I have to view this as little more than “poisoning the well” against Obama for the general election campaign.
Clinton could have given just this sort of speech in Michigan, which has proposed a compromise solution to the DNC, but that would have entailed her campaigning AGAINST the state’s own proposed compromise.
In truth, seating the Florida delegates as per its outlaw primary does Clinton no real good, or, at least, not enough good to matter in the end.  The + 38 delegates she might get out of Florida under her best case scenario will not approach Obama’s delegate lead, nor will the popular vote differential be enough to put her over the top.
It’s Michigan that she needs, but it’s to Florida that she goes, stalking Obama there as he tries to somehow make “peace” with the Florida voters, but skipping over her opportunity to challenge the Michigan compromise in Michigan when Obama was there. 

Posted by: Lee C.  ―  U.S.A. | May 21, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

we are now learning to cross over and if he picks Thune for vp wow.

Posted by: Bishop | May 21, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I suppose it is beyond what you so highly educated BHO fans could remotely comprehend. HRC is campaigning to help BHO to get the MI and FL counted so that he could remotely have a shot at it, although it is all but certain that BHO will lose anyhow.
You are not gonna win back the poor, less-educated, bitter people. They will go back to cling their guns and God.

Posted by: lazy to think | May 21, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Why don’t people look at this issue from the other side? I am sure there were millions of voters who didn’t go to the polls because they thought the vote wouldn’t count? Aren’t they just as disenfranchised? It isn’t just about those who voted, but also about those who did not because they were playing by the rules. there are two sides of this issue and Senator Clinton cannot argue one side only.

Posted by: Jan | May 21, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

IF SHE WAERE AHEAD IN DELAGATES THEN IT WOULD BE THE DELAGATE COUNT THAT MATTERS, NOT POP VOTES. SHE IA A CHEAT,CHEAT,CHEAT I CAN’T BELEIVE THIS WOMAN HAS ANY SUPPORTERS

Posted by: PROUD AA | May 21, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

There are no ethical limits for this woman. Lies, Lies and more lies… Soon, Hillary will be telling us that Obama wants to sell all Floridians and Michiganites into slavery, or send them to a crematorium!!!!! Edwards, Gore, etc, where are you? This conduct needs to be denounced publicly, strongly and NOW!!!!

Posted by: harold | May 21, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Uh, this is a private political party primary. This has nothing to do with “voting rights.”
As someone stated quite eloquently, the party could draw straws to pick a candidate.
Primary’s are not in the US Constitution.

Posted by: PRIMARY RULES | May 21, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Jan, Clinton cannot argue one side only.
True. So, where were you when she said let’s have a re-vote months ago? Obama didn’t want it.

Posted by: President | May 21, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Clinton’s call to seat the delegates of Florida and Michigan really appear to be self serving……

Posted by: tony | May 21, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

I agree with Senator Clinton. All votes should be counted. Senator Obama wants to win by default and corruption. He knew he could not win Michigan so he removed him name from the ballot. And even though he had TV ads out for Florida he did not win the majority of those votes either. He is a flake and a fraud. He thinks all rules should benefit his campaign.

Posted by: Mary | May 21, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

president
doesnt hillary need obama too?
after all she is losing

Posted by: bhrandon | May 21, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Imagine that you are watching the world series. One team is ahead of the other by 3 runs in the bottom of the ninth inning with two outs. The coach of the losing team convinces the umpire to give his team an extra 2 runs and extend the game for three more innings. Now I ask you, if that fair? NO!! Well that is exactly what Hillary is trying pull in this election.
IT’S TIME FOR THE SUPERDELEGATES TO ACT AND END THIS GAME!

Posted by: Boston Guy | May 21, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

bhrandon,
For what exactly?

Posted by: President | May 21, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Even if Hillary doesn’t win this one with the DNC Credentials Committee, the voters in Florida and Michigan will remember that it was Hillary Clinton who fought to get their delegations seated and their votes counted.
It doesn’t matter how we got to this point, who’s right or who’s wrong, whether rules were broken.
If Democrats have any hope of winning in November, the voters in Michigan and Florida must feel as if the Democrats care about them.
The only one showing them any love has been Hillary Clinton. The DNC and the Obama campaign would be wise to follow suit.
Because no matter how much the DNC was attempting to “control” rogue states, the voters in those two states hold the power to choose the next President of the United States.
So, it’s time to kiss and make up.

Posted by: sherr | May 21, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I heard that Obama wants to take over the DNC I say let him have it

Posted by: Bishop | May 21, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Onward to victory for Hillary.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I was undecided before watching this woman in action. Now I don’t understand how anyone would even want to be around her. What is wrong with this woman? Everything she’s done in her campaign shows that she’s not capable or worthy of the position — not that the other candidates are either, but she’s in a class by herself!

Posted by: ac | May 21, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

SUPERDELEGATES are spineless.

Posted by: Student | May 21, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

President,
You are wrong, they both favored a revote in MI. Obama wanted to do it according to the RULES and let everyone vote. Clinton wanted to exclude anyone who didn’t vote that day. We had low voter turn out here in MI. It’s was held Jan. 15 and we had a snow storm that day, about 3-5 inches. No one went to vote unless they had something important on the ballot in their city.
So anyone who didn’t vote, couldn’t vote. Count ALL the votes, huh?

Posted by: Really? | May 21, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

I pledge to DNC if Obama is on the
ticket I WILL NOT VOTE democrat.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 21, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Hillary can’t steal it at this point. It is already over. According to many insiders, the undeclared superdelegates have always been heavily in favor of Obama. They were just afraid to come out against the volatile Clintons, lest she win, then personally bury them in the party in a mass grave. McCain is even more vindictive. He doesn’t just carry a grudge, multiple corroborated stories in the media indicate that he’ll beat you over the head with it first, and then go behind your back to make sure that you are black-balled for life. McCain and Hillary really are quite alike, at least in temperament and political style. I’m so glad that we’ll be spared both of their dictatorial and intimidator styles of leadership after November.

Posted by: Jan | May 21, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

lol i am completely outraged at how manipulative and insane hillary is…
lie cheat and steal sweetie
but remember the rest of the democratic party will stomp your ass for what you are trying to do
hell lets really start some stuff, let her leave… mccain will have to deal with barr and paul, i mean lets see how many parties we can get on one ticket and have a good ol fashioned fist fight
hillary will still lose the presidency and obama will win!

Posted by: bhrandon | May 21, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

The whole panel last night on CNN was all gloom and doom as they discussed how exit polling spells mucho trouble for Obama in the general election. David Gergen looked like he wanted to cry.
People are starting to work on their electoral maps and see that Obama cannot win.
President McCain – get use to it!!

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Really,
Good excuse…

Posted by: Student | May 21, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Obama is trying to steal Hillary’s victory. Obama is flying too high when he declares himself the winner. All states should vote in all elections before the winner is declared and it should go to the convention if necessary.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Really,
I could get on board that idea. I won’t vote McCain, but I could definitely vote Barr.
Sounds like a plan.
I must say I am astounded. I think Hillary may be in the middle of some sort of mental health crisis.

Posted by: I HAVE AN IDEA | May 21, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Some of the panel last night said Hillary should go to her voters and say “If you’re voting for me because Obama is black, then I don’t want your vote!”
THAT’s how much trouble these Obama loving journalists realize Obama is in.
Suck it up MSM. If people want to vote for Hillary because Obama is a black man…I have news for you…..THAT IS THEIR RIGHT!!!

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

@ Jo….I saw that and for the first time, Roland Martin didn’t have much to say.

Posted by: david in texas | May 21, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Hillary’s victory??????

Posted by: d | May 21, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Michigan and Florida ignored the agreed upon rules for the primary. There has to be a penalty for this. I can concede that some delagates from Florida should be seated, Half. They should retain thier superdelegates and the popular vote will not be counted in regard to the Primary. No matter how you slice it, it was not an above board primary and everyone knew it prior to the vote.
Michigan is different, not all of the candidates were on the ballot and a significant amount voted uncommitted. The demographics say that Obma would have likely carried the state 55/45. Award half of the states delegates and split them 50/50.
In the end, it will make no difference. Even if you award the delegates as is, Obama will be the next Democratic nominee. It is time to look forward to the GE and start really showing that this election is about the stark differences of where each of the parties wants to take this country in the next 4 years.

Posted by: Louis | May 21, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

David Gergen is kinda like Jelly Bean Dean.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

That’s the Hillary supporters.
They claim they’ll do one thing then turn and do the exact opposite.
Many claim to not watch CNN or MSNBC b/c their in the “tank” for Obama. Yet every election night they’re quoting analyst from those two major networks.
It’s the same as Obama. They will claim not to vote for him now but come November they will.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 21, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Louis,
She is no longer arguing about pledged delegates. She knows she can’t catch him even with FL/MI.
She is now demanding the only metric be the popular vote that doesn’t include caucus state votes with any accuracy and which would give Obama ZERO in MI, and last but certainly not least Puerto Rico.
She is throwing down on the DNC. Let’s see if they have the chachas to body slam her this time.

Posted by: PRIMARY RULES | May 21, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Strongest case yet? LOL SAME case she has been trying to make since it became apparent she HAD to have those votes BUT ONLY if they do not give ANY to Obama ROTFLMAO Whoever wrote this article? Do us all a favor and go get the sex change your apparently needing to feel fulfilled.

Posted by: Brian | May 21, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Vanessa, actually people will claim they’re voting for Obama and won’t. That’s how it has worked so far.
But nice try.

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

What is important here? That Obama wins the nomination? Is that your sole goal?
Because without the votes in the certified elections counted, which by the way DO count just not the delegates, there is no hope that either state will go dem in the fall. None.
2.3 million voted. That is only a fraction of who will vote in november. These are the party base, these are the voters who VOTE.
I no longer care how we got here, nor do I blame either candidate for the problem, but the fact is the DNC made one hell of a mess. When options were set out Obama’s campaign didn’t want to revote(he may have won, but whatever). And after Hillary said the quote Obama supporters quote so often about the states not counting, she added that they will be seated in the end, that no one wanted to leave out two such important states. She said that then. She say’s it now. Does it help her, maybe, but at the bottom of it all it helps the democratic party, because without counting those votes, those voters, we hands down turn those states solid red in november.
Now really, what is more important?

Posted by: drae | May 21, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

I won’t ever forget the way the press acted they were all in the tank for Obama from the start they trashed Hillary .

Posted by: Bishop | May 21, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

She has no shame in not sticking to the rules if they don’t benefit her. Just like Bill playing golf with Terry McAuliffe. She’s out a lot of money and Bill’s speech charges will be a lot less if she isn’t in the White House. I always wonder if her wanting to change the rules has to do with her growing up as a Cubs fan. And counting votes in Michigan when Edwards and Obama followed the rules and took their names off the ballot and saying she won is just another spin of the truth just like the thrice told (or more) lie about sniper fire in Tuzla.

Posted by: bhciapol | May 21, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

biciahpol,
And you guys didn’t want to stick to the rules in 2000 when you wanted that illegal recount only in certain areas, AND wanted votes to count AFTER certification.
Looks like YOU are the hypocrites. Lol.
You lose.

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

GA
McCain will run circles on your girlyman

Posted by: President | May 21, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

All voices should be counted no matter who agreed to what. Most of my family lives in FL. We should have a say…! !

Posted by: KURT | May 21, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Clinton’s desire for a recount appears to be self-serving…..

Posted by: tony | May 21, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

If a voter casts thier vote of thier own free will it should be counted. Party rules should not disenfranchise a voter. The Primary was moved up by the Republicans.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

This is soo silly, it’s like, “oh yay, I am winning by popular vote if you count 2 states, of which both my husband was really popular in, both my opponent didn’t run in, and in 1 (michigan) my opponent wasn’t even on the poles! LOL, ok, so lets assume Obama was on the poles and people could of voted for him, hmmm, Maybe she isn’t leader the popular at all because of all of those people who would of voted for Obama on the poles, after all there were 45% who said “undecided” in michigan, count those towards Obama just for kicks and who is winning, hmm, OMG, it’s still Obama LOL. I just had to post this, not because I am behind either one but her argument if each party had a fair run isn’t credible AT ALL, she would still be losing and in the end it would make her look worse.

Posted by: So Silly | May 21, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Jan’s comment: I am sure there were millions of voters who didn’t go to the polls because they thought the vote wouldn’t count? Aren’t they just as disenfranchised?
My opinion Jan is that they CHOSE not to vote which is far different than those who did vote and not likely will not be counted, for either side.

Posted by: lee | May 21, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Obama is not in trouble at all. Huge amounts of donor money. Huge crowds for speeches. Inspirational ideas. Media backed to the hilt. Superdelegates waiting adoringly in the wings. Hell, people even applauded at a speech when he sneezed. This is a great orator who will win in a landslide against a hobbling McCain. Remember Bob Dole? Neither do most people. McCain has no money, no personality, no self-control, and no Republican base. McCain is sexist, stupid, pro-War, and by self-admission, knows little about Economics in the midst of a recession. Jobs? Gas Prices? Health Care Reform? Rolling back tax breaks for the wealthy? Help with college expenses? These are easy issues for Obama to debate and score big with the poor and middle class voters. It’s a no brainer. Let the Hillary supporters vote what ever way they see fit.

Posted by: Jan | May 21, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

“America is a downright mean country”
Michelle Obama 2008
Hey Michelle, we think you’re mean and we don’t want you for First Lady.
How about them apples?! Lol.

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Jo:
If senator Obama, a graduate from Columbia University and Harvard Law School makes Bush looks like Einstein, who does senator Barack Obama make you look like? A dummy?
Bush is the president of the United States of America…..not bad, huh? And senator Obama is running for president….What are you running besides your mouth?

Posted by: tony | May 21, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

There’s one simple answer to all of this. REVOTE !

Posted by: KURT | May 21, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

GA
You did forget to be a real man. I see that you are very grateful to McCain. It shows!!

Posted by: President | May 21, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Tony, I was just showing you gaffes that make it impossible for you to present Obama as such a smart guy.
That’s all we hear is how smart he is, and how dumb Bush is.
Sorry, you lose again.
Next.

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is $31 MILLION in debt. The only reason she’s staying in the race is so that SUCKERS LIKE YOU donate more to her campaign so that she can pay off her bills and bow out. Otherwise, she’s stuck with the bills herself. Clinton would rather let the bills go unpaid, thereby harming hundreds of companies who worked for her campaign. Failing that, she would rather thief her supporters into paying the debt on her failed campaign. The situation is quite disturbing.

Posted by: Think | May 21, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

GA, go read the people who are studying the electoral maps for the general election.
They say it’s almost impossible for Obama to win. They go through the reasons in much detail.
But go ahead and fool yourself — just as you did in 2000 and 2004. It’s your grief, not mine.

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Lee C–
“She drew a big fat line in the sand today. She must believe the DNC and super delegates don’t have the cajoles to stand up to her. I wonder if she is right? “
Not the DNC and Super Delegates but the American people who believe that every vote counts and if the democrats don’t need the American people we don’t need them.

Posted by: Linda, CA | May 21, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Obama is trying to declare hinself president without the endorsement of his like an uncle, spiritual advisor Rev. Wright.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Absolutely absurd argument! My mom and dad stayed home in Florida because they knew their vote wouldn’t count (both Obama supporters), as I’m sure a lot of people did. This is Hilliary’s hail mary, worse she’s trying to manipulate the system. In the end it will only embitter more Clinton supporters against Obama. What a piece of work she is, putting herself above the party. In the end her legacy will be damaged…just like Bill.

Posted by: Cathy | May 21, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

The math doesn’t add up. A constant theme circulated by pundits and papers arguing that Hillary should drop out and let Obama focus on the general election. I couldn’t agree more that the focus by all should be on the general election and before it’s too late. The problem is there are two math problems – the convoluted primary math problem made up of 48 states and caucuses (which arguably give a grossly disproportionate amount of delegates per actual votes)and the general election math problem which is far more logical and arguably the problem we all should zero in on – no caucuses, all 50 states (the latter is the math problem Hillary is working on and why she is in this race to the end). The superdelegates of the democratic party were given a responsibility – to fairly judge each candidate to determine who is most electable in the general election. To judge which candidate is most likely to win the electoral college. Key states for the general election are WV, KY, FL, PA, TX and OH. These states are essential for the democratic candidate to secure. We know who won these states yet the media has chosen to ignore this critical math. Another issue the media seems to discount are the millions of angry voters who feel disenfranchised to the point of switching parties. May 31st is a pivotal decision day for democrats and republicans – both parties will anxiously await to see how the delegates will be seated in Florida and Michigan. Over 2 million voters right now have been silenced and feel ignored. Maybe a moot point now, but this has impacted Hillarys momentum in the primary to a exponential degree. It was a huge disadvantage to her campaign to no be able to count these delegates from the beginning and build on this win. With a race so close (population vote neck and neck, with Hillary ahead), it is essential to count every vote. The point of a primary is to judge how the candidate performs to determine who is best equipped to win the general election – the fact is the DNC will not admit that punishing Florida and Michigan is only punishing themselves. Florida and Michigan have no incentive to vote for Obama because he has not shown any interest in hearing their voice. So let’s give those two to McCain. Now with obamas comments on clinging to guns and religion, he has handed Pennsylvania over to McCain. Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia were landslide victories for HRC where the demographic is more likely to swing towards McCain than Obama. Loyalists in New York, Arkansas and across the country will vote for McCain – stick out the 4 years – and then await Hillary to run in 2012. Southern states other than arkansas will vote republican. Add it up. How can Obama win this? It seems forcing Obama into the democratic nomination is only to make a statement now and deal with the consequences later – yes it says a black man can do anything, as the similar statement can be made of women if Hillary is the nominee. We need to get past the gender and race excitement and focus right now on the individual – their record, their character, their baggage, their agenda, their solutions, their electibility – and make the decision that can ultimately hand the white house back to the democratic party. As much as you hear McCain is 4 more years of Bush, the fact is he is far from Bush. He is a war hero and an established successful senator with a powerful record – appealing to republicans and independents. He has a plan to end the war by 2013 and he has a realistic approach to foreign policy – something Bush and Obama lack. Despite what pundits say on the cable news, Democrats are not guaranteed the white house just because America is exhausted by 8 years of Bush and desperate for change. The fact is all 3 candidates will be a change from the last 8 years – the question is which direction of change do we want to go – and judging by the general election math question – this question of direction will either go the way of Hillary or John McCain. It is up to the DNC on May 31st and the superdelegates on June 3rd to determine this path of change for the betterment of the democratic party and the future of this country.

Posted by: kerry | May 21, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Ga
Just letting you know that’s what going to happen if after June 3rd she is debt.
Obama was willing to help her.

Posted by: President | May 21, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Hillary had it her way, and got it put to her just face it lady you have been beat. Obama is the the Democrats chose. VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2008 THE DEMOCRATS CAN’T DECIDE VOTE McCain!!!

Posted by: James A. Muncy, Jr. | May 21, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Hillary Clinton did not make any issue of Florida and Michigan voters before Big Tuesday when she expected to walk away with the nomination. Now she represents all those disenfranchised voters? If the DNC allow her to steal this nomination, then I will persuade every new Dem voter I brought in to vote for an Independent on the ticket in November rather than her or McCain. I will owe no loyalty to a party or candidate that condones cheating! I am a 67 year old white LOL not a fan struck youngster. The younger voters may still be in College or newly employed but if they can be sent off to Iraq to fight and maybe die, then they have a right to vote too. Too many Clinton supporters knocking them as being too simple minded or inexperienced. Old enough to die, old enough to vote! Add the Independents, switching GOP voters, outraged Blacks and Hispanics who now are not hard working Americans since only White workers know how to do that per Hillary and her core base. She said it! We add up to a lot of numbers that she seems to think she no longer needs to win in November. More Clintonite math.

Posted by: Tricia C | May 21, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

At least 1/2 of Hillary supporters will have no problem staying home or voting for McCain so they can see Hillary run again in 2012. McCain is not Bush – at least that’s what the media has told us for years and years.
THAT is just ONE of the reasons Obama will lose, and lose BIG.

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

It is ridiculous proposition to count the half-baked primaries that were run in Florida and Michigan. First of all, most voters stayed home when they found out the primary wouldn’t count. Second of all, OBAMA WASN’T EVEN ON THE MICHIGAN BALLOT! Clinton is deranged if she thinks her Michigan votes should count when her opponent wasn’t even on the ballot (and thus received 0 votes)! Unbelievable.
Clinton needs to DROP OUT OF THE RACE before she completely destroys the Democratic party (or is that what her scorched earth policy is actually about)?

Posted by: Think | May 21, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

How would each of you like it if someone told you not to bother voting. You are NOT included in this process here in the United States of America. This race is not over until everyone VOTE IS COUNTED. The media doesn’t determine the if the campaign is over. The delegate count is not a deciding issue unless the 2209 is reached anything other then that means it goes to the convention to be decided. Plain and Simple!
That what you call democracy!
WHAT IS EVERYONE SO AFRAID OF?
THAT THE COUNRTY WILL BE DIVIDED?
NEWSFLASH: WE ALREADY ARE. A STRONG LEADER WILL BRING THE COUNTRY TOGETHER.

Posted by: ana | May 21, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Obama has kinda a slick, foggy aura about him and voters faint. I believe some voters should get a life.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Jo said, “Obama will lose, and lose BIG.” YEAH… RIGHT. That’s why Obama holds an 8 point lead over McCain in the latest Zogby national poll. Obama will lose all right. Lose himself right into the White House!
OBAMA ’08.

Posted by: Eric | May 21, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Lee C-
I just e-mailed Barbara Boxer (I live in California). I’m sure it won’t matter but this crosses a line and our representatives need to know it’s time to step up.
I don’t think Hillary is interested in uniting or “fixing” anything. She also talked about being ready to go to the convention floor for a fight.
What a ridiculous mess. Ego before country.

Posted by: DISHEARTENED | May 21, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

HRC needs to accept the reality that the DNC made the rule change and that is FINAL!!! Any change will result in a lawsuit I promise you. There will be NO rule changes at this time. HRC is a complete JOKE to expect this now. She is Dishonest and has ZERO character. Anyone who supports her is a total LOSER and obviously has NO competence or intelligence. Of course the data indicates HRC supports are High School dropouts or convicted felons or on welfare. Wake up USA, HRC is the worst thing that could happen to this country short of an asteroid impact!

Posted by: Pete Rend | May 21, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I find it absolutely pathetic and appalling that many Hillary Clinton supporters would rather vote for war monger McCain and send their and other US citizen´s sons and daughters off to a bogus war than vote for Obama who is committed to bring our troops home. Obama´s platform is about 95% what Clinton´s is…only he delivers the message much more effectively. For Clinton supporters to play “sour grapes” is a poor way of dealing with our country´s pressing issues. Obama is the nominee…I suggest all Democrats get behind him.

Posted by: George | May 21, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Hillary, we support you for the party’s nomination and we look forward to electing you as the first Woman President of the United States of America. You truly represent our hopes and aspirations. Your efforts to have the votes of Florida and Michigan are only right. These are Americans. Your opponent disses Small-Town America, rural America, and the apparent working white class for why did he ignore the Americans of West Virginia. Thank you being strong and true to our values.

Posted by: benvictor | May 21, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is $31 MILLION in debt. The only reason she’s staying in the race is so that SUCKERS LIKE YOU donate more to her campaign so that she can pay off her bills and bow out. Otherwise, she’s stuck with the bills herself. Clinton would rather let the bills go unpaid, thereby harming hundreds of companies who worked for her campaign. Failing that, she would rather thief her supporters into paying the debt on her failed campaign. The situation is quite disturbing.

Posted by: Think | May 21, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

ana,
I couldn’t agree with you more. Count ALL the votes.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Why does “Over the HIllary” want to win by cheating, she would be a lame duck just like George “W”. The total vote count She uses ignores caucuses, and ignores the rules of not campaigning or not being on the ballot. Stop cheating Hillary and DROP out !!!

Posted by: philosopherkingtomas | May 21, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

POP QUIZ KIDS:
ROUND ONE:
Q:Who is HRC’s Michigan State Campaign Chair?
A: Jennifer Granholm
ROUND TWO:
Q. Who is the Govenrnor of Michigan?
A. Jennifer Granholm
ROUND THREE:
Q. Who voted to move MI Primary, in violation of DNC Rules and aware of the sanctions to be imposed?
A. Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm
BONUS ROUND:
Q. Which Michigan Super Delegate endorsed Hillary Clinton LAST FALL?
A. Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm.
Any one else see a pattern here???
It’s so Karl Rove.

Posted by: Really? | May 21, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Against all odds, Obama is gonna win! I know the truth hurts Hilary supporters but rally behind your leader! Obama ’08

Posted by: winner | May 21, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

George said, “I find it absolutely pathetic and appalling that many Hillary Clinton supporters would rather vote for war monger McCain” — George, most of the people telling you to vote for McCain are Republicans pretending to be Democrats.
This is part of Rush Limbaugh’s Operation Chaos plan. You can GOOGLE for the details, but Limbaugh is instructing his listeners to pose as Clinton supporters in an attempt to steal votes for McCain. Limbaugh thinks Democrats are dumb enough to believe this garbage and vote for McCain over Obama.

Posted by: Eric | May 21, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Didn’t other states (NH and SC among them) ALSO jump the line and vote differently than they were supposed to? Why are those votes being counted?

Posted by: Beth | May 21, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Almost half the voters in Michigan voted for nobody to keep from voting for her and who knows how many stayed home. She wants to count her votes and give Obama zero. She actually wants us to believe giving her 100% of Michigan is the will of the voters. Michigan voters don’t want that. Oh, and if your state system is a caucus you don’t count at all in her math. This woman is insane. I’m a white woman over 50, working class, and all that but PLEASE… can’t she manage a little bit of integrity?

Posted by: Sara | May 21, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

bluebird, it’s not Obama who’s NOT letting the “loyal voting base” count, it’s the DNC, and with good reason. Listen, everyone knew the rules of the game going into this. Florida and Michigan broke the rules, now live with the consequences.

Posted by: Cathy | May 21, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

ya know, I mean like OMG, I just Luv Obama, I mean, like he is like soooooo cute and Hilary is like so, like my mother and like who cares about issues anyway, I mean like, me and my bff are like soooo into Obama cause you know like he’s half white AND half black and that is like sooooo cool and all these people that like don’t like him are like soooo stupid.

Posted by: druggstohr | May 21, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

The latest Rasmussen Poll indicates Senator Clinton would win over Senator McCain in Florida 47-41. Senator McCain would beat Senator Obama 50-40.

Posted by: LindaJ | May 21, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

I noticed that Kentucky’s exit polling reflected over 40% of Democrats said they would not vote for Obama if he were the nominee. That is wonderful news to all of us and it is becoming a pattern. The Dems backing Obama are using him to insult white Americans. We must unite to beat them in November, regardless of party. McCain isn’t great, but Obama is an insult.

Posted by: RobbingHood | May 21, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

The rules for MI and FL were clear going in. They went against the condidtions set out by their own party and they were well aware of what the consequences would be. Hillary knew too. It isn’t likely that Hillary would be interested in all this “fairness” if she held Obama’s lead or better at this juncture. You can bet that she would be pretty much verbal in opposition to counting those delegate votes. This country can certainly do better than to have yet one more president that wanted to “bend the rules” whenever it suited their own personal advantage.

Posted by: foxisms | May 21, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

OBAMA DON’T NEED HILLARY HER SUPPORTERS WANTS HER TO BE PRESIDENT NOT VP.THE PERCENTAGE OF HER SUPPORTERS WHO SAID THEY WOULD NOT SUPPORT OBAMA PROBABLY WON’T. SO SHE WOULD NOT BE BENEFICIAL TO THE TICKET. THEY WOULD VOTE FOR MCCAIN SO HILLARY CAN RUN AGAIN IN 2012.
THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO GIVE THEIR COUNTRY TO THE REPUBLICANS FOR 4 MORE YEARS JUST OUT OF SPITE I JUST DON’T TRUST HILLARY OR HER SUPPORTERS.

Posted by: PROUD AA | May 21, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Think,
That is the difference in the Hillary supporters, we don’t mind contributing to her even if it is to pay down her debt. We believe in our candidate and think she is the best person for the job.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

How can Clinton rightfully claim the votes that she received in Michigan when Obama’s name was not even on the ballot. The Clintons always believe that they are above the rules…even when they agreed to them. The Clintons are the true ELITESTS who think that they are above the rules and above the law as pander to the uneducated to keep themselves in power.

Posted by: Michael | May 21, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

GA,
Obama CANNOT and WOULD NOT use any money he has received to pay off Clinton’s debts.
The only thing he can do is ASK his donors to donate to Hillary’s campaign or hold joint fund raisers with her.
People are LYING to you about your donation being used to pay her debts. That is against the law. The money you donated can be spent only on Obama’s direct campaign expenses.
Don’t be fooled by republicans trying to cut into Obama’s funding.
Research it and you will see that I am correct. E-mail Obama’s campaign and ask. Call the DNC. Just do not take the word of a republican.

Posted by: My two cents | May 21, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Think said, “Hillary Clinton’s campaign is $31 MILLION in debt. The only reason she’s staying in the race is so that SUCKERS LIKE YOU donate more to her campaign so that she can pay off her bills and bow out.” That is actually a very good point! How in the heck is she going to pay off that $31 million? She HAS to stay in the race and try to get as many contributions as possible, or else her and her husband are in some SERIOUS debt. Unbelievable.

Posted by: Eric | May 21, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Molly are you crazy? Racist and belittling…really!!!! Girl you need to look at the Clinton campaign and see the dirty political machine for what it is.

Posted by: Cathy | May 21, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

      “She must believe the DNC and super delegates don’t
      have the cajones to stand up to her. I wonder if she is
      right?”
      DISHEARTENED | May 21, 2008 5:06:10 PM
If it were mine to decide….  I’d halve the Florida delegates, pledged and super, along the lines of the Republicans’ punishment to Florida, and go with the 69-59 split proposed by Michigan (crediting Obama with the “undecided” votes there).  Net to Clinton + 48 pledged delegates.  She’s currently 150 + pledged delegates behind Obama, so that would come under the “no harm, no foul” classification for Obama.  No way for it to affect the outcome, and hard for Clinton to bitch about with a straight face.  (Not that continuing the bitchin’ would actually be a problem for Clinton.)

Posted by: Lee C.  ―  U.S.A.    | May 21, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

POP QUIZ KIDS:
ROUND ONE:
Q:Who is HRC’s Michigan State Campaign Chair?
A: Jennifer Granholm
ROUND TWO:
Q. Who is the Govenrnor of Michigan?
A. Jennifer Granholm
ROUND THREE:
Q. Who voted to move MI Primary, in violation of DNC Rules and aware of the sanctions to be imposed?
A. Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm
BONUS ROUND:
Q. Which Michigan Super Delegate endorsed Hillary Clinton LAST FALL?
A. Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm.
Any one else see a pattern here???
It’s so Karl Rove.

Posted by: MI VOTER | May 21, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

I CAN SEE THIS CAMPAIGN GOING ALL THE WAY TO THE CONVENTION. THERE, OBAMA WILL BE NOMINATED. CLINTON FORMS HER OWN PARTY AND WINS THE ELECTION. IF SHE FORMS HER OWN PARTY, SHE DOES NOT NEED OBAMA. SHE WILL BEAT OBAMA AND MCCAIN IN THE GENERAL. THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL PEOPLE. GO HILLARY IN 08.

Posted by: jimt | May 21, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Why is Obama not letting the votes count?

Posted by: steve | May 21, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

It’s really quite simple, if you want to play you have to play by the rules. If you don’t follow the rules you don’t get to play. Any questions?

Posted by: PhilBgood | May 21, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I have more knowledge in my left nut than Barry Obama has in his head. Why are so many people infatuated with this clown?

Posted by: Rod Goesinya | May 21, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Beth,
SC and NH were given permission to have early primaries.
That is why FL/MI were punished. The DNC wanted a cross section for the first four primaries. They were hoping to involve more people in the process.
That worked out real well didn’t it.
Rules are rules. Hill agreed to them. PERIOD.

Posted by: My two cents | May 21, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

What is the big deal about not counting the Michigan and Florida primary votes? I do believe that counting these votes is both ethical and necessary to our democratic exercise. This action will erase all doubts in the people’s mind that there is a hidden agenda here. Count the votes and be done with it. Surely if Hillary loses these votes in Michigan and Florida, she will stop her insistent clamor to redo the votes in the aforementioned states.

Posted by: Marissa Calumno | May 21, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

It was never a question if they would be counted,,,it was always why wouldn’t Obama allow revotes…
Who in the world really wanted to disenfranchise these two states? Stripping them of 100% of their delegates was a totally irrational move. Legally and legislatively stopping revotes was the wrong thing for Obama to do.
So now Democrats chances for winnoing these 2 states are fast slipping away…and Obama went to Florida and never mentioned the topic.
Crowds and money are not always the best indicators of what is really going on.
I just wrote another letter (he obviously didn’t read the first) to Howard Dean in response to another plea for donations to the DNC. It said “Count the Votes”

Posted by: Jackie | May 21, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Is Obama afraid to campaign in Kentucky and West Virginia because of the white working class people who cling to thier faith and guns and that are bitter?

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

to PhilBgood. really, you have to play by the rules. does the name george. w. bush ring a bell. kinda shoots your idea all to sh– doent it.

Posted by: jimt | May 21, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

You know, Karl Rove might be sick, but he consider a master mind on politics. DOn’t be so quick to dismiss him. He’s been right a lot. PLus, there are many other electoral maps projecting that without the battleground states, Obama will lose to McCain. The only hope he has is to salvage his relationship with FL and MI voters. Now, I might change my mind, but right now, I will be voting for McCain if Hillary is not the nominee. And that cause I will not support the DNC if they are not going to count ALL the votes. Screw the rules, screw the Obama spin on delegate rules. He’s just making up the rules to suit him for this moment. He’s being short-sighted and EVERYONE knows it (it speaks to why people don’t want to vote for some who is so inexperienced and running on an empty campaign promise of hope and change.)

Posted by: bluebird | May 21, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Jimt said, ” CLINTON FORMS HER OWN PARTY AND WINS THE ELECTION.” RIIIGHT. So, Clinton will form her own party, starting out with $31 MILLION in debt from her current campaign. So, she spends June, July, and August recovering from the $31 MILLION in debt, and picks up a few more million for the election in November. Meanwhile, Obama gets another $100 million in donations, and repeats his 80,000 strong crowds across the country in speeches, while Clinton gathers a few hundred for hers. Sure. You’re right. Clinton has a shot.

Posted by: Eric | May 21, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Obama supporters,
Answer me one question. Why can’t Obama “seal the deal” if he is so great?

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Ok…who’s being totally stupid here? How do you fairly count the votes of MI, when Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ba;llot in the first place. Does Hillary have any idea what sort of a lop sided deal she thinks she’s entitled to here? Does she think we all have “stupid” stamped on our foreheads?

Posted by: foxisms | May 21, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

All this posturing and shouting is going to cool down real soon, and we’ll wind up with a Obama/Clinton ticket, just you watch!

Posted by: John Right | May 21, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Counting the votes of those who voted, and not cpunting the votes of the people who stayed away from the polls in reliance on the rules, turns the people who stayed home into disenfranchised chumps. Now that isn’t very democratic, very fair, or very nice, is it?

Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | May 21, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Jo:
Impossible for senator Obama to be a smart guy because of mistakes? What!!!???? are you talking about?
By the way, It does not matter much pertaining to a free concert of an unpopular band……senator Obama draws big crowds with or without a band…popular or unpopular….You really should grab a hold of yourself….

Posted by: tony | May 21, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Most of the people I know did not vote in FL because they knew their vote wouldn’t count. The only fair way count FL is a revote or a compromise.

Posted by: david | May 21, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

eric: regardless, obama will never be the president, all of us gun toting, uneducated, bitter people will see to that. by the way, how old are you. im guessing 14

Posted by: jimt | May 21, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

So now Obama team is willing to compromise? Why didn’t they say the same up front 2 months ago? They want to lure FL and MI votes, and they already crowned Obama as the nominee, so why not just give whatever makes Clinton happy? This is all about political games! Anything & everything said and done by Obama and his team have been forgiven or totally ignored or always have explanations, yet Clintons are viewed never right, even good things done and said by Clintons would be viewed as evil minded. What is wrong with this election and the stupid dem party?

Posted by: tiger | May 21, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

OMG Hillary. Play by the rules. I can’t stand you anymore. First of all, the popular vote is irrelevant. Secondly, Obama was not on ballot in Michigan. How dare you. Go Away

Posted by: billy smith | May 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Hillary has been a divisive and polarizing candidate from the beginning. Today she has threatened to take the Fl, and Mi. issue to the convention if she doesn’t get what “she” wants from the rules committe. A committee stacked with 13 of the 30 members committed to her and lead by her chief backroom sleaze Harold the “Ick”!
Its not enough she has engineered division between black and downscale whites, women and men, older and younger. Now she wants to divide democrates in Fl and MI, from the remainder of the party.
She will never support anything that is fair because it doesn’t suit her purpose.
The fair solution is to seat the pledged delegates but NO SUPERDELEGATES!
These are the ones who decided no revote and caused the problem in the first place.
That way the innocent voters aren’t punished and the fat cat politicians who created this situation would be.
This however will never fly because it doesn’t help Hillary enough!
What a crock!

Posted by: Mchenry | May 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Posted by: John Right | May 21, 2008 6:09:08 PM
I don’t think so John. Hillary doesn’t want the VP slot. She’ll have way more responsibility as a Senator.
And, I don’t think Obama wants her on the ticket as VP, and if she get the nomination, he doesn’t want to be on the ticket. The situation is screwed up.
What’s worse, is I think that if McCain gets a minority woman or man as his VP, the DNC is going to be screwed if Obama is the nominee.

Posted by: bluebird | May 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Oh sure, here we go again! LOL!
Anytime someone does not want to belly up to the bar and drink the kool-aid it is because we are racist or sore losers. You need to try and grasp reality for a change. I read someone who described your guy as an infection. Perfect!
Some of us love our country too much to let that infection spread.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

John said, “we’ll wind up with a Obama/Clinton ticket, just you watch” HECK NO! Why would Obama want to inherit the $31 MILLION in debt that Clinton has racked up in her campaign. That is a huge liability, and that’s not to mention the fact that Obama can do MUCH BETTER than Clinton as a VP. Clinton cannot even run a campaign successfully, let alone a country.
The way this race is going to end is by Obama picking up 30-50 more delegates in the remaining primaries, and then 20-30 more Super Delegates (out of the ~300 remaining). This will all happen by June 3, and Obama will the nominee and this charade will be OVER. Thank God.

Posted by: Eric | May 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

ga. didnt teddy roosevelt become the president eventually? thought so.

Posted by: jimt | May 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Voters in Florida were misled by the Democrate leadership of this state who failed to tell us what the ramifications would be for moving our primary date. I’ve voted in every single national election since 1968 when I turned 21. This may very well be my last election and I want my vote counted! I cannot believe that any group could simply decide whose vote should count and whose vote should not! I truly believed that those days were over. I guess not !

Posted by: soose | May 21, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

JIMT–
What are you smokin’, I want some.
Hillary has until June 2nd to petition to get her name on ballots in 50 states in order to run as an independent.
Do you see that happening? Even if she did, she couldn’t win.
Dude, the party is split in half–McCain would win in a landslide. You must have taken the same math class Hillary did.

Posted by: LOVE IT | May 21, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

why is she fighting now. why didn’t she fight for florida and michn.
IF SHE BELIVES WHAT SHE SAYS NOW WHY DIDN’T SHE CAMPIAN THERE WHY?????

Posted by: dem | May 21, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Go ahead and count the flawed FL election results:
50% for ‘Hilarious’: “Please send me your 11 year old’s bike money.”
33% for Mr. ‘Wright’
14% for the Namby Pamby redneck eye blinker.
Now,
Edwards’ 14% will go to Obama making him achieve 47%.
WHOA: IT’S A WASH. Shut up Clinton.
Pathetic waste of time.

Posted by: Areef | May 21, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Michigan and Florida voters should demand that the DNC reject their earlier declaration that those two states couldn’t seat the delegates. This is the most undemocratic thing I have heard of. Get rid of the weakling Howard Dean and the lot of them. They are cowards and should not represent the Democratic party in anyway. I also say too bad Obama for not siding with the voters and having his name on the ballots. That was one of only several mistakes. There should be no re-votes. Whatever and whomever they voted for should count. If they didn’t vote for a candidate, then that is the voters mistake. Hillary should have both of those states. Geez this is so maddening.

Posted by: Kris | May 21, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

WE OBAMA SUPPORTERS NEED YOU HILLARY SUPPORTERS. FORGET THE MEDIA THE PUNDITS AND ALL THAT STUFF. WE NEED EACH OTHER. THE ONLY THING JOHN MCCAIN HAS ARE WHITE MEN. LOOK AT WHAT WE HAVE YOUTH, BLACKS, HISPANICS, COLLEGE EDUCATED, WHITE WOMEN, AND OLDER WOMEN. TOGETHER WE CAN BEAT HIM. 40 MILLION PEOPLE HAVE VOTED IN THE PRIMARIES
YES WE CAN DEMS 08

Posted by: Allamr18 | May 21, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

J…what do you need to know? Seal the deal? He came behind as a no name candidate and kicked the political crap out of someone with the machinery, name recognition and capital that made her a shoe in. You make it sound as if were Obama to “seal the deal” you would support him and go along with the out come. You know that’s hardly what you would do. So why ask inane question like “why can’t he seal the deal”? It makes absolutely no difference to you anyway. You seem more inclined to simply play the spoiler.

Posted by: fletch | May 21, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Angry Woman said, “OBVIOUSLY, OBAMA CANNOT GET THE WHITE VOTE”
HUH? Obama won Oregon by a 60-40 margin. There are like 3 black people in the entire state of Oregon! Most EVERYONE that voted for Obama in Oregon was white. Obama has gotten out the vote for all races, both genders. That is why he was able to get 80,000 people to hear him speak in Oregon last weekend, and it is why he has the smarts and appeal to win the Presidency. It is no wonder Obama is 8 points ahead of McCain in the latest national Zogby poll. OBAMA ’08. YES WE CAN!

Posted by: Eric | May 21, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

To jimt: I agree that George W doesn’t play by the rules, so why does that make it ok for Hillary to do the same? Also, your other post says Hillary should form a third party. Come on, you and Hillary’s other supporters can’t even raise enough money to keep her in the black thru the primary season. Where are you going to get the necessary money to run a general election campaign. Hillary is BROKE! $20,000,000 in the hole! You expect her to run the country and she can’t even manage a primary campaign. She’s lost, get over it.

Posted by: PhilBgood | May 21, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Tiger,
So now Obama team is willing to compromise? Why didn’t they say the same up front 2 months ago?
Because they just figured out with their educated people around them that they need them for November. So is kiss a## time.

Posted by: FL | May 21, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

One has to wonder….If Obama wins, will he push for Ebonics to be the national language?

Posted by: Empty Headed | May 21, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

IF YOU people put mcain in the whithouse after the last 8 years you all should be ashamed of yourself. really

Posted by: dem | May 21, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Posted by: david | May 21, 2008 6:10:27 PM
A revote would work but no time now to do that. I don’t think a compromise will work because of the “intent” of the voter theory. If they didn’t come out, there is no way to decipher their intent. The only intent that is clear is from the votes cast.

Posted by: bluebird | May 21, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

At a debate just ahead of the MI primary, Clinton was asked why she didn’t have her name removed from the ballot and her answer was that it was a mistake, clerical error, that she (her staff) didn’t get to it… and now that mistake is what she’s demanding to be final word in the nomination… is that what we deserve? Another mistake in the White House?

Posted by: Clerk | May 21, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

To paraphrase HRC, I was in favor to not count the votes before I was in favor of counting them. You seen, when I discovered I was going to lose the primary, it became my utmost priority to stand up for every vote (for me).
Only HRC would think a vote with only her name on the ballot is fair. She lacks any sense of honor or character. That is why she lost the primary.

Posted by: ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead | May 21, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Eric,
Most Oregon voters vote like black people. Oregon voters are an exception, not the norm.

Posted by: Candid Opinion | May 21, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Michigan and Florida are part of the United States of America so count the damn votes. Go Hillary!!

Posted by: andrea | May 21, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

One of the most accurate sites to use to follow election trends is http://www.electoral-vote.com/. A great resource during the last two presidential elections.

Posted by: dal | May 21, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Obama is trying to keep Hillary’s votes from counting. What a slick Willie!

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

jimt—
You are wrong. The DNC does not absorb the debt. Look it up.
What will likely happen is she will be able to roll the money she has raised for the general into her senate campaign and then roll her debts from this into her senate campaign fund.
However, that $11.4 mill she loaned herself, that is toast. She gets $250,000 of it.
But the DNC does not absorb it, ever.

Posted by: LOVE IT | May 21, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

jimt said, ” Hillarys debt will be assumed by the dnc at the convention” You are so wrong on that topic. The Democratic party does not pay for the debt of it’s candidates. If It did, *I* would run for President and borrow $500 million and advertise 24-hours a day, 7 days a week. What happens is the reverse — any campaign contributiions left over from losing campaigns are given to the national headquarters for use in the November election. Neither the DNC nor the RNC pays for the debt of their losing candidates, especially candidates that borrow THEMSELVES tens of millions of dollars like Clinton has to run her failed campaign.

Posted by: Eric | May 21, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

jimt: From ABC News 05-21-08, ‘Paying herself back the money she pumped into her campaign might prove to be trickier if she exits the race. FEC rules limit a candidate from raising more than $250,000 after the conventions to pay personal debt. However, she has until now and the Democrats’ August convention in Denver to fundraise to pay herself back.’

Posted by: PhilBgood | May 21, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Can someone tell me if it’s true that Obama is really a Muslim posing as a Christian.

Posted by: DEWEY GLANS | May 21, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

To all the bigots threatening NOT to vote for Obama if Hillary loses…go ahead, you puddin’ heads! You’re not real Democrats then anyway…probably more of Rush Limbaugh planted mouthbreathers trying to sway the vote! No TRUE Democrat can honestly sit back and say they’d prefer John McSame and a continuation of Bush’s failed policy over a Democratic candidate. If you do, you’re either a liar, or simply braindead and your vote never meant anything to begin with! So please, spare us the tantrum! It’s getting really old and tiresome!

Posted by: Katie D. | May 21, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

I feel the Obama Camp would take Senator Clinton as a VP because they would prefer to have her “with them” rather than “against them”.
Sort of a paraphrase to “you keep your friends close, and your ememies closer”.
Her part of the deal will be that she is “in line” for the big job in 8 yrs.

Posted by: John Right | May 21, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Hmmm.. so let’s bring up that rigged election in Bushy’s brothers state as governor, yah, if they could steal the election through fraud and legal pandering in 2000, sure it’s tried and true.

Posted by: dumb sheeple | May 21, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

F YOU people put mcain in the whithouse after the last 8 years you all should be ashamed of yourself. really
Posted by: dem —————
IF Obama was a truthful candidate and we know what he actually stood for we wouldn’t have to. IF Obama knew that there wasn’t 57 states we wouldn’t have to.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

It amazes me how ignorant and vicious people can be on both sides. Obama supports and Clinton supports. Do you really think all of the nastiness is needed to discuss the issue at hand? I take offense to all of the things said about people if they voted for one or the other. We are not unintelligent individuals that cling to guns or religion or don’t have an education. We all voted for the person we felt was best suited for the job. They are both fighting to be the leader of our great country and all you people can do is call each other names and make nasty remarks. Stand behind the person you feel is best suited to be POTUS, if your choice is not elected, then so be it, stand behind your country and vote for the person running for your party. If we don’t make a difference then there can’t be any change anywhere. Stop, listen and stop showing your ignorance by not listening to the real issues. This country needs someone that can fix it. Either one of the democrates running can make a stab at it and do the best they can working with what they are getting from the republicans. But this I won’t vote for her or him or I will jump party lines is just plain stupid. If you don’t want 4 more years of Bush, then you better pick one you like and vote for them. And come November, you better be smart enough to know that what we got is what we have to work with and vote for them.

Posted by: Kody | May 21, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

“Can someone tell me if it’s true that Obama is really a Muslim posing as a Christian.”
No Dewey, Obama and his family ARE Christians! And if you have to take the word of someone here to actually find out something like that, then you’re either ignorant or a ‘Dittohead’ trying to stir up BS!

Posted by: Derrick, Chicago | May 21, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Count all the votes???? That is unamerican… G** D*mn America

Posted by: Rev. Wright | May 21, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

“All votes should count (except caucus only states)” – Hillary
“Super Delegates should vote for whoever they want, even if it goes against the popular vote” – Hillary
“My campaign agrees that FL/MI won’t count so we won’t campaign there” – Hillary
“I support a MI re-vote, but only people that haven’t voted… so people that already voted for me can’t vote again and people that voted “other” also cannot vote – and Obama gets 0 of their votes as it’s the only way I can claim the popular vote” – Hillary (ok, I made this up but it’s what her campaign has been promoting)
I want a woman, not THIS woman!

Posted by: chris | May 21, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

This is America. Elitist rules should not suffocate the will of the people. Count the votes, count the people. One nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all.

Posted by: Carlos | May 21, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Empty Headed…you most certainly are. You needn’t worry about the influx of Eubonics into our schools if Barack is elected. The man is eloquent and speaks the mother tongue better than even most Caucasians…certain better than many of those who voted for Hillary recently in PA, NC and Kentucky.

Posted by: fletch | May 21, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Hey folks, the two party system is a scam. Only Ron Paul would be honest and not greedy enough to fix the system.

Posted by: dumb sheeple | May 21, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Obama is Christian didn’t you see the church that he sat in for 20 years with the racist pastor?

Posted by: George | May 21, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

What would Obama do if Chavez or Amehdinajad criticize him? Is he going to cry racism?

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

I used to like the Clintons. But now I think Hilary is not even fit for the bottom of the ticket. MI & FL did not matter when she was winning but just to weaken Obama shot at the presidency race she is talking about seating those votes. Screw MI & FL anyway they broke the DNC rules. If Hilary manages to steal the election from Obama i’ll vote for Nader not MCCain like some of fake democrats. Obama ’08

Posted by: No_MI_&_No_FL | May 21, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

She signed the agreement that MI and FL delegates do not count. Terry McAuliffe, as part of the Rules and Bylaws Committee, first warned, then punished MI and FL.
Anyway, this argument is moot. Most reputable reports say that the delegates WILL be seated after the May 31st meeting, but at half strength. Both Clinton and McAuliffe have stated numerous times that the Democratic Party will have its nominee by June 15th and the Party will be unified going to the convention.
Remember, she is just under $20 million in debt, and she HAS to say things like this or she cannot raise money. I just pity those poor saps that help her now.

Posted by: Texas Voter | May 21, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Fox News is fair and balanced. I heard Hillary’s speech and heard her speak many times but when I watched CNN all I could see was the chosen one.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

PEOPLE: It is not about politics and game-playing, it is about our voice, the people’s voice, not being heard.
Is it our fault that party honchos decided to break rules and do as they may for the primaries?
Is it our fault that party big wigs are playing hard ball and closing their ears to the people’s voice?
Our constitution guarantees us, the people, the right to elect our leaders.
By not counting Michigan and Florida votes, our voting rights are being stepped on.

Posted by: Jiji Moran | May 21, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Obama remains UNELECTABLE

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Posted by: Jan | May 21, 2008 5:42:32 PM
As you can see from OH, PA, KY, and WV, all the money in the world is not going tto save Sen. Obama in Nov. He outspent her, he had massive amounts people at his rallies, he’s got door to door people….HE”S got people. But Hillary still beat him for all that. It’s incredible and such a huge tribute to her. I’m not saying it to be spiteful, really my gripe is on the media and the DNC.

Posted by: bluebird | May 21, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

I used to like the Clintons. But now I think Hilary is not even fit for the bottom of the ticket. MI & FL did not matter when she was winning but just to weaken Obama’s shot at the presidency race she is talking about seating those votes. Screw MI & FL anyway they broke the DNC rules. If Hilary manages to steal the election from Obama i’ll vote for Nader not MCCain like some of you fake democrats. Obama ’08

Posted by: No_MI_&_No_FL | May 21, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

If the Democrats don’t count Florida and Michigan they are throwing those electoral votes to the Republicans.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

You’re all idiots if you vote for Hillary or Obama.

Posted by: John McCain | May 21, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

“Fox News is fair and balanced.”
Warning! Warning! Danger Will Robinson! My sensors indicate a Dittohead is present!
When someone calls Faux News fair and balanced, I know I’m either dealing with a staunch Republican or a Bill O’Reilly, felaffel-fed zombie!

Posted by: Sharky Mitt | May 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Owh! Owh! – I remember this from a space movie! Its the part where the guy waves his hand at the other guy and says… “There’s no winner here…” And the guy replies, “There doesn’t appear to be a winner here”. No – no, I must be confused. Owh! Owh! Now I remember. Its that other part, where the guy waves his hand and says, “I’m ahead in the popular vote”, and the other guy replies, “I think you’re ahead in the popular vote”. Or maybe its the part where the guy said, “Michigan and Florida broke the rules so none of us will campaign there and those votes won’t count”, then when he’s behind does a complete 360 and say’s “Now that I’m behind Florida and Michigan should count”. To which the other guys replies, “huh”? Seriously, Hillary Clintons exhibiting serious signs of drug addiction. She’s delusional, she’s spent all her campaigns money and now she’s spending Chelsea’s inheritance, she’s confused, shows a total lack of awareness of what’s going on around her – and she’s in denial! Maybe if Hillary got some help or maybe an intervention she could find a way to quit? OR… Maybe somebody ought to tell her that she’s not really Obi Wan Kenobi, the Jedi Mind Trick only worked in the movies, and she’s not really in Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back. Frankly, (Whisper) I think she’s in the need of prayer.

Posted by: HoosierBrain | May 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Carlos, it’s easier to control a people if you let them believe they they have liberty and justice and are free than it is to actually allow them to have liberty and justice and truly be free. See the pattern that’s been goin’ down in America for the last hundred years or so, yet?

Posted by: foxisms | May 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

I used to like the Clintons. But now I think Hilary is not even fit for the bottom of the ticket. MI & FL did not matter when she was winning but just to weaken Obama’s shot at the presidency race she is talking about seating those votes. Screw MI & FL anyway they broke the DNC rules. If Hilary manages to steal the election from Obama i’ll vote for Nader not MCCain like some of you fake democrats. Obama ’08

Posted by: No_MI_&_No_FL | May 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Katie D,
The Real Democrats are the ones who won’t vote for Obama. Your country comes before the party. What part of that don’t you people get. To call all of those people who will not vote for Obama bigots shows your ignorance. It has nothing to do with his race for some of us. That is like me saying if you don’t vote for Hillary you are sexist. Get off the race BS. How come Obama hasn’t sealed the deal? I’d really like an answer to that.
My vote counts just as much as yours and everybody else’s. I just choose to vote for the person that I know something about, not some fly by night person that the media has anointed as the “chosen one”.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Where were Bill and Hillary when John Kerry needed them in 2004? Did they really breath a sigh of relief when he was defeated?

Posted by: Badgersouth | May 21, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

It’s time to Stop the Insanity.
Super delegates get the hook, do it now. Send Hillary to a nice quiet place where hopefully she can come to peace with the idea that it was not preordained that she be POTUS.
Maybe she can make friends with Napoleon while she is in there. They have a lot in common.

Posted by: Susan Powter | May 21, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008 6:27:44 PM
I have to say, reporting FOX has been tremendously good. I think FOX is beaming on their new found prestige. But its so true.

Posted by: bluebird | May 21, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

arent the margins Clinton won in WV and Kentucky the margins she LOST BY IN GEORGIA AND SOUTH CAROLINA? WHAT is the point

Posted by: dc | May 21, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

I wonder, if Hillary is so far in debt, who does she owe that money to? Are small business owners suffering because she’s not paying her bills? Bill Clinton left us with money in the bank. George Bush squandered it all and left us with an enormous deficit. Don’t we need a leader who doesn’t spend money they don’t have?

Posted by: louielouie | May 21, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

No_MI_&_No_FL It is completely foolish to believe that obama can win the ge without the support of Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, California, New York, Kentucky, etc. OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE even more so if he insists in alenating Florida and Michigan.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

I noticed Oregon and WV are equally white SO WHY the disparity in voting? could it be dare we say…..too many cousins, marrying cousins?

Posted by: dc | May 21, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

When you have made a mistake in voting for a war of choice and then you agree to abide by DNC rules about moving up a primary (heralded by the Governors of Florida and Michigan) and then you agree to strategists that you can ignore caucus states cause their votes don’t amount to much and then you agree that big money is the safer bet and then you trail in a race against a relativity unknown a year ago and then you stand before your party and the nation and claim all is for the people – I sense “Me” has moved to the top of the agenda. Senator Clinton you service to the country is appreciated. You represent a fine state. You represented us well as First Lady (albeit I would have taken the cast iron skillet over his head and he’d still be sleeping on the sofa). You raised a fine daughter. It is now time to get behind a fine young fella from Illinois, wish him God speed and lead your fellow Senators to back changes on the party platform which will lead this nation out of the chaos left by this Administration – elements of which to come will take our breath away. Please do not proceed in the Karl Rove style of division – the cost will be felt for generations to come.

Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 21, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Hillary is fighter and is the candidate that can really accomplish something for the people. Obama is a puff of smoke.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

“To call all of those people who will not vote for Obama bigots shows your ignorance. It has nothing to do with his race for some of us.”
HA!HA!HA!HA!HA! I was in Kentucky a few days ago and the people I heard and talked to most CERTAINLY were bigots and I did hear many say they would never vote for a black man,so with all due respect “J”, you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about! And if you don’t know ‘enough’ about Obama, then shame on you…there’s even a book out there on his life, if you’re too lazy to do the research on the Internet!

Posted by: Lemmywinks | May 21, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Democrats are controling House and look at that what are they changing for our country? Nothing or get worse. How do you think if American have a Democratic President? I really don’t want to think about it. Disaster…
Sen. Obama complains about RACISM and Sen Clinton blaims on SEXISM.

Posted by: Chris | May 21, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

I think that old bat Ferro should help her pay her 10 million dollar debt.
Go BO GO, PLEASE DON’T LET THAT OLD BAT STEAL THIS FROM YOU.

Posted by: NE/ CLEVELAND | May 21, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

DC the point is Demographics. There are more blue collar white workers. Obama can not win the GE just with the AA vote and the vote of a few nerds

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

I failed to see the Senate bill Senator Clinton introduced to get rid of the Electoral College in favor of making the President as a result of a popular vote…I looked but didn’t see it.

Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 21, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

“WE DONT CARE WHAT AN OIDIOT LIKE YOU THINKS OF HILLARY.”
Ummmmmm, just a suggestion there, Einstein, but if you’re going to call someone else an idiot, at least know how to spell it, you simpleton.

Posted by: Jared J. | May 21, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

The point of all this is (as I said before) Sen. Clinton will get the VP spot because she can help Sen. Obama in states he is weak in. Former Pres. Clinton can also help them get the vote out. An Obama/Clinton ticket is going to happen. Just wait and see!
For strong Obama or Clinton loyalists, they can vote for for either candidate they’ve supported, knowing that if they win, they both win. Also Sen. Clinton will be in the driver’s seat in 8 yrs for the #1 job.

Posted by: John Right | May 21, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Katie D — Tell it to Nancy Pelosi cuz I CAN’T HEAR YOU.

Posted by: druggstohr | May 21, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Lemmywinks even if the reason that people wouldn’t vote for Obama is bigotry, at the end he is unelectable.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

TJ,
How can you argue that all 50 states count and then say Hillary is winning where it counts? That is a wee bit contradictory don’t you think?
So you admit there are states and votes that just don’t count? Therefore Hillary’s argument is wrong by your own argument. Clearly only the votes you want to count actually count.

Posted by: HANG ON | May 21, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

LIE, CHEAT AND STEAL, ITS THE CLINTON WAY OF LIFE…
by the way, who are monica lewinsky and jennifer flowers voting for?

Posted by: oldwhiteguy | May 21, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Is this the same Hillary Clinton who, prior to the Iowa primary, stated flately that she and her crew would abide by the DNC rules. AHHhh the joys of political expediency!

Posted by: AlchyDave25 | May 21, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

J: Obama has sealed the deal! Hilary needs to raise money to pay off her debts that is why she has stayed in the race. In 13 days this contest will be over.

Posted by: No_MI_&_No_FL | May 21, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

I wouldn’t vote for Obama even with Hillary as VP on the ticket. He is unelectable and she would be embarrassed in the GE. We better write her name on the ballot and wait for 2012

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Well, if you put it that way Hillary. You are right, that’s how it should’ve been in 2000 and that’s how it should’ve been for this election. But it is not so. The rules in the book today which you signed said autherwise. The law in the country allows the political parties to determine independently what their rules are for their primaries. That’s how the democracy you speak of was set up.
So, just who are you defending today, yourself or the voters? Your credibility will be enhanced if you made such advocacy a feew years ago when it would not favor you in any way. Today, you come across as very selfish.

Posted by: Gillis Obama supporter | May 21, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

OnTheGloryRoad–
In 2000 she was the first one screaming about how the popular vote is what should count. And yet in the 8 years that have passed she has done nothing to try to change that.
Her campaign folks were heavily involved in the writing of the current DNC rules. This is the absolute height of hypocrisy.
She depends on those low information voters and thus far they aren’t letting her down.

Posted by: HANG ON | May 21, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

If every vote must be counted, then why does the democratic party limit who can vote on a state by state basis? In some states anyone can vote in the demo primary, others only declared democrats can vote. So the disingenuous claim that all votes must count is, shall we say, disingenuous!

Posted by: ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead | May 21, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Obama broke the rules campaigning in Florida.The other Dem candidates didn’t, but he still lost. Obama is unelectable.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

She is now wanting to change the rules she voted FOR and says”they should be counted EXACTLY as they voted” She is something else ..Gene you said it well they Owe and they are wanting to collect and the Clintons can not pay wowowowow.I sure hope the 3 of June that the supers come over and end this STUPID womans dream…….Hilly you LOST give it up ,you are wasting time and money….Your name will be NOTHING if you keep this up and I will bet you NEVER get to be a Senator again either.You have screw your political future lady.

Posted by: a white woman voting for Obama | May 21, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

dc, I noticed Oregon and WV are equally white SO WHY the disparity in voting? could it be dare we say…..too many cousins, marrying cousins or too much Rap music in Oregon.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Posted by: Katie D. | May 21, 2008 6:22:07 PM
Katie, we’re just getting started. We are women hear us roar, in numbers to great to ignore.

Posted by: bluebird | May 21, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

hang on She is ahead in popular vote.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

No jimt, I don’t have a mortgage. We built our own cabin a little at a time, with money as we got it. I don’t believe in amassing a lot of debt, but rather prefer to pay as I go as much as possible. So did the small business owners agree to take small monthly payments from Hillary?

Posted by: louielouie | May 21, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

It is an affront on the collective intelligence of Americans by Clinton to want to base her case to the super delegates on a sham, as if really fighting for the people of Florida and Michigan. If she can fight so hard and fiercely, where was her fight when the sanctions were imposed? What was she thinking when she signed an agreement acquiescing to the measure? Is she also as concerned about the millions of people who did not come out to vote, thinking their vote would not count?

Posted by: TK | May 21, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Anders Scooper–
Not my fight but—huh?>?
Too much rap music in Oregon? What are you talking about.
rap music—in Oregon?

Posted by: HANG ON | May 21, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Harold and proud AA…How dare you speak of ethics and cheats. Don’t you know that Obama is the King of those traits??? Read the Chicago Tribune and do try to keep up. Obama is involved in a corrupt and dirty low down political scheme that goes all the way to Iraq. It’s probably too complicated and time consuming for you to concern yourself with. I just happen to be concerned enough about this country to dig deep into everything to do with this criminal. His day is coming. He hopes to be President so he can pardon all of these pigs. I hope they arrest him before the GE.

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Lemmywinks,
Why would I read a biased book telling me how great Obama is? The one book is based on his association with Rev Evil is it not? There is stuff lurking out there that hasn’t come out yet. He has not been vetted like Hillary or any other candidate has. Yes there are some people who won’t vote for him because of race, but they are not the majority.
The internet is NOT the place to look for info. Half of what you read on here is NOT truthful.
The MSM is not going to tell me who to vote for. IF you are one of the sheeples who wants to get on that bus, feel free to do so. Those of us who choose not to are not bigots.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Democrat party knows if they do not recognize FL and Michigan votes in the primaries, they can forget any chance in the General election. So Obama the divider is blackmailing the party into losing the Presidential election just for the glory of being the first black nominee.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Let the popular vote decide this. What else is a clearer expression of the “will of the people”?
This is a DEMOCRACY. The people, and their vote should determine this. Not what some pledged delegate, or politically influenced caucus results show.
I challenge ANYONE to tell my why you can complain about Bush beating Gore with less of the popular vote, but when the tables are turned you don’t apply that standard.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

What is the point of all this. She has already LOST! Why does she continue to antagonise everone and complicate the process. Time to stop the BS.

Posted by: Time's UP | May 21, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Libre–
I beg to differ–although I admit I did not take Hillary Math 101.
She has not won the popular vote.

Posted by: HANG ON | May 21, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

count the states!!!! she has won the major one’s anyway! too bad the democratic primaries weren’t like the republican ones?
hillary would of one by a landslide… like mcCain did. he won the states and got all the total delagates!! that how it should be.

Posted by: peter | May 21, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

I like Hilary, but her hypocrisy is tiring. She should have fought (her rallying cry) for these voters when she agreed with the DNC that they would not count. And her argument that the popular vote should count versus the electoral votes;..when did that occur to her? Bottom line is her people underestimated Obama and the result is..;she lost. Is she is really as tough as she claims, then suck it up. If she needs an example, then observe the suffering of common citizens over the past 7 years. Please. Please. Stop whining. It is SO not Presidential!

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

She has not won, she is ahead.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

As I understand it, the Munchkins are ready to break out singing a rousing rendition of “Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead!” when Sen. Barack Obama clinches the nomination.

Posted by: Badgersouth | May 21, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

a white woman voting for Obama. Can you be rehabilitated?

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

You Clinton cronies should just go home and lick your wounds. The race is over. Get over it. Time to move on. Her supporters are racists (they said this themselves) and narrow minded. So be it. Now move on and sop cluttering the internet!

Posted by: Had Enough | May 21, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

You have tried harder than any woman in the past. You have earned your place in history. Now, you seem to be truning bitter. That will mess up every success you have acheived. You can play but you must play by the rules, including the ones you helped to set up.
The people have spoken. They said, A woman is good, but this particular woman, Hillary, is not good enough.

Posted by: Gillis Obama supporter | May 21, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

She’s preposterous. She claims she’s won the “popular vote” but conveniently ignores that many states had caucuses with NO numbers released on # of votes cast. Obama overwhelmingly won the caucuses. She wants to seat Michigan even though Obama took his name off the ballot and they all agreed in advance that the results would not count. She wants to count Florida even though no one campaigned there and they all agreed in advance the results would not count. She is deluded, really deluded, if she thinks the DNC is going to change the rules for her. Worse, she’s acting like she’s been victimized by the process, so she can make the DNC look bad when they decide to follow their original rules and discount the FL and MI results. The only way that MI and FL can be counted is if they revote and have VALID contests. Otherwise, the DNC cannot count those results as doing so would be seen as changing their rules to marginalize Obama and his supporters. No matter what she wishes to happen, the DNC makes the rules and she is obligated to abide by them.

Posted by: stsw531 | May 21, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Libre–
Again, I beg to differ.
She is not ahead in the popular vote.
In fact there is no popular vote. The vote is contaminated. There has not been an accurate count.
Unless of course you don’t think all 50 states count. Only the one’s Hillary won.
I’m outta here.

Posted by: HANG ON | May 21, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

bcb Are you talking about Obama, right? he is the whiner all this campaign, Would he cry racism if Amehdinajad or Chavez criticize him?

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Badgersouth…You do say dumb things. Where was Obama when John Kerry ran. You are concerned where the Clinton’s were but not where Obama was. Do you suppose he was in Iran or Iraq or Indonesia. I’m sure it wasn’t in OUR 57 states.

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

TJ – Hillary won in WVa but you should be aware of some fine points. The State voted for GWB, but split it’s ballot and voted for Democrat Senator. When Senator Clinton went to the Senate Senator Byrd of WVa was her mentor on Senate rules and he (whether one likes him or not) is the recognized Constitutional scholar. On the war he clearly pointed out that it was against our Constitution to invade a soverign nation that had not attacked this country. Hillary went against him. Even AFTER she won the primary in WVa, he endorsed Senator Obama. Now one can debate the will of the people all they want (and with strong and 100% merit) one also has to consider DNC rules and why Superdelegates – leadership, wisdom, party seniority and service. Senator Byrd’s endorsement (as he had said many times) would be delayed until after his State’s primary. He then placed his support behind the candidate he thought best – and I would suggest to you and others a candidate that recognized the importance of our Consitution even when it was originally written would have considered Senator Clinton unable to vote and Senator Obama unable to vote and 4/5′s of a human being. Obama is not sexist and Clinton is not racist. Byrd is not ignorant. The people of WVa where coal is king and where “taking your jobs away” has resulted in far, far, far less mine jobs and their Appalachian landscape flattened by Mountaintop Removal (MTR) while GWB has appointed Judges to the 4th Circuit that has protected one of the most devestating environmental actions of our lifetime – all the while they remain loyal to the coal companies that has controlled their lives and fallen pray to “Swiftie” type Karl Rovian lines like his father was Muslim, he don’t wear a flag pin – the fundamentalist preachers just repeat it. Oversimplification of the analysis of the majority vote in that state is dangerous considering what the general election will be about. I do not mean to belittle anyone, but I can 100% guarantee you without a doubt that a Karl Rove type mailer by a PAC about infidelity will be in the mail the day after Hillary would get a nomination – without a doubt (how do I know? – I have two uncles who are what are called hard-shell Baptist ministers and they have already preached on the subject. And God knows I have been cast out of the family for my support of Senator Obama because I would vote for a man of that color. Yes I was born in West Virginia – I do not live there. My heart has been broken too many times.)

Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 21, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

“Clinton Demands Florida, Michigan Votes Count”
I’m sorry, did someone say something?

Posted by: Move on Already! | May 21, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Why is she still in this? hm, she does have the popular vote at this point, she is the one with the momentum.
Since the Rev Wright controversey broke, Obama has been doing poorly.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

One thing is for certain after reading the posts from Hillary supporters and that is the demographics about them is true. They are the least educated and they are financially poor. If they had any money they would be donating it to Hillary’s campaign and getting her out of debt. And, by reading some of these ridiculous posts made by Hillary’s supporters, it only shows that they got their high school diplomas out of a box of cracker jacks.

Posted by: PhilBgood | May 21, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Nobody ever talks about the GOP voters that are effectively disenfranchised because their states vote late, and the nomination has already been decided. The solution to this, and the situation in FL and MI is to have the primary on one day all across the nation. That way we can eliminate this stupidity once and for all.

Posted by: Juanito | May 21, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I challenge ANYONE to tell my why you can complain about Bush beating Gore with less of the popular vote, but when the tables are turned you don’t apply that standard.
Posted by: Jeremy
—————————————–
Ever hear of the electoral college? Popular vote doesn’t count in this country. We’re a Democratic REPUBLIC. If you have a problem with it, take it up with the founding fathers who determined the general public, if allowed, would screw up elections, so the electoral college was created to prevent that from happening.

Posted by: ding-dong-the-witch-is-dead | May 21, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

When has Obama cried racism? No need to cry about what is obvious is there?

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Democrat party knows if they do not recognize FL and Michigan votes in the primaries, they can forget any chance in the General election. So Obama the divider is blackmailing the party into losing the Presidential election just for the glory of being the first black nominee.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Looking through the keyhole, Alice(Clinton) sees herself asleep in the park. As the mob draws nearer, she calls, “Alice(Clinton), wake up!” to her sleeping self until she gradually awakens from the dream to the sound of her sister’s voice. The two of them return home for teatime while Alice(Clinton) muses on her adventures in Wonderland, realizing that perhaps logic and reason exist for a purpose.

Posted by: beaupritchard | May 21, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Facts about Obama: Obama did send numerous letters to the State in favor of Rezko slum lord land deals and has not explained why he did not ask Rezko as to the nature of the deals.Obama has many well documented links with anti-American and unrepentant domestic terrorists as follows* Rabidly anti-Israel Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi. The Obamas were regular dinner guests at Khalidi’s Hyde Park home for years.* Terrorist sympathizer Ali Abunimah, who runs the viciously anti-Israel web site Electronic Intifada.* Unrepentant Weather Underground terrorists William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.* Reverend Jeremiah Wright. What more needs to be said?* Anti-Israel foreign policy adviser Samantha Power — fired after calling Hillary Clinton a “monster.”* Anti-Israel foreign policy adviser Robert Malley — fired when it was revealed he has been holding talks with Hamas.* Hatem El-Hady, former official of the Hamas-linked charity Kindhearts, closed by the Justice Department. El-Hady’s web page—with Michelle Obama listed as an opt-in “friend”—suddenly vanished from the Obama campaign site with no explanationSam Graham-Felsen, hired to run Obama’s blog, writes about Noam Chomsky in a Marxist publications that openly calls for revolution against the American government. Is it fair to say that Obama has a love affair with communists who hate America and want to over throw the government and is friends with sleazy people like Rezco? You be the judge.

Posted by: SimpleQuestion | May 21, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Obama will win the nomination battle, but he’ll undoubtedly lose the war.
Hillary will undoubtedly lose the nomination battle, but she would have had a better chance at winning the war.
Dem primaries are quirky. Where else can citizens double vote & use super delegates and then call it “the will of the people?”

Posted by: Carlos | May 21, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

i think this is funny!!! if not for the clinton’s, there would be no democratic party!!!!period!! we all know that!! now half the dem’s are throughing them under the bus???why?? i just don’t get it.

Posted by: peter | May 21, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

No true Democrat will vote for Obama in the GE.

Posted by: libre | May 21, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Have you ever noticed the more we learn about Obama the better Clinton’s case seems to sound. I’m at the point that it makes complete sense to me.

Posted by: Terry | May 21, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Peter wrote: “… hillary would of one by a landslide… like mcCain did. he won the states and got all the total delagates!! that how it should be.”
Uh no. McCain didn’t win all the states. Romney won some and Huckabee won some. Keep in mind that Republicans are “winner take all” so even with a narrow victory McCain got all the delegates for that state. I wouldn’t call McCain’s victory a “landslide,” exactly.

Posted by: stsw531 | May 21, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Why are the Clintons so greedy.Obama please never allow her on the ticket. I would even prefer Old Jimmy Carter than greedy lawless Mrs Clinton.

Posted by: Matthew, London | May 21, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

If Clinton is not the Democratic nominee, McCain will be our next president. This Clinton supporter will vote Republican for the first time in 32 years if the monumentally unqualified Barry is nominated.

Posted by: Ferd Berfle | May 21, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Can someone please tell me what the vote count looks like since the Rev Wright controversey? I don’t have the exact #s :)

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

1. SIXTEEN months ago, Hillary Clinton, along with ALL the other 8 candidates who were running for the democratic nomination, ALL OF THEM, signed a contract which said that because they broke party rules and decided to move up their primary voting date, that the states of Florida, and Michigan would not count.
BUT when Hillary started losing the race, she STARTED LYING, ACTING as though she had not actually signed a contract. even when shw was confronted with her lies on television.
2. So not only is Hillary trying to get the votes in Florida, and Michigan counted, ( ONLY because she needs them to win), Hillary has said that she wants to EXCLUDE all the votes that were cast in states with caucases. She says that they should not. Now Hillary does not want the votes cast by voters in caucus states counted. (There goes Hillary’s whole argument that she wants EVERY vote to count) The fact is that Hillary only wants the votes in the states SHE won to count. So if you live in a caucus state, Hillary DOES NOT think ANY of your votes should count, And she said so!!
THIS IS THE TYPE OF MANIPULATION, AND DISHONESTY WE CAN EXPECT FROM HILLARY AS PRESIDENT. SHE HAS ALREADY SHOWN SHE HAS NO RESPECT FOR RULES, OR CONTRACTS.
WATCHING HILLARY LIE, AND CHANGE THE RULES WHENEVER SHE FEELS LIKE IT, SHOW THAT SHE IS MANIPULATIVE, AND DECEPTIVE, AND CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO KEEP HER WORD!

Posted by: LAUREN | May 21, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

J: Obama has sealed the deal! Hilary needs to raise money to pay off her debts that is why she has stayed in the race. In 13 days this contest will be over.
Posted by: No_MI_&_No_FL ——-
Newsflash: If he sealed the deal he would have the 2025 needed to win. He hasn’t sealed squat.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Look, the longer this goes on the worse Obama looks. The truth always comes out in the end. He’s nothing but an anti-american racist, just like his wife AND pastor. I’ve still yet to hear any of his policies. He’s nothing but hype. And he’s already starting to crack. McCain – A true American.

Posted by: Ryan | May 21, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

      “Net to Clinton + 48 pledged delegates.”
      Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 21, 2008 6:04:55 PM
There’s an “opps”.  Bad math there; net to Clinton would be + 29 pledged delegates; otherwise the story remains the same.

Posted by: Lee C.  ―  U.S.A. | May 21, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

If Clinton does not win the nomination, I will either vote McCain or not vote at all. I have to study McCain more, but for a Republican he is very tolerable (and I don’t buy the BS argument by Obama’s campaign that he is a Bush clone. In fact, if he were, why would so many of the ultraconservative Republicans be so opposed to him???)

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Peter:
You are wrong. The guy who resurrected the democratic party was late Ron Brown, then chairman of the party. The first chairman in decades to stand up to the Republicans and helped elect Bill Clinton. He alone should take the credit. Go research it.
Some suspect he lost his life for it.

Posted by: Gillis Obama supporter | May 21, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Hillary, please stop. I have lost total respect for you.
You are a liar and a cheat and that will be your legacy.

Posted by: juneau52 | May 21, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Nothing unites Dems & Reps together more than Obama. I have never seen both parties coming together in such numbers to vote for McCain. Sorry Michelle, this is such a mean country.

Posted by: Condi | May 21, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Let’s be realistic. Most of you didn’t even know these other primaries existed. And how many times has the nominee been selected before these voters ever stood in a voting booth effectively removing them from the process? The order of primaries matter and should be addressed. Personally I think going forward there should be a 2 month primary season and at the end all states vote.

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Some are saying Hillary is a liar, theif, cheat, scam artist and pulling all manner of tomfoolery! Others are claiming the same, and worse, of Obama.What do you expect??? They’re liberal Democrats are’nt they?

Posted by: AlchyDave25 | May 21, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Lauren:
It was the politicians who made the decision to move up the elections–not the voters. You sound like a Bush neocon who doesn’t want the Florida votes to count. I’ve seen that picture before and it hasn’t gotten better with age.

Posted by: Ferd Berfle | May 21, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I prefer Young at Heart John McCain to Obama.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

To GA:
Well, let’s talk about fairness here -
So you are ordering the DNC to pounce all over Hillary and kick her right under the obama bus huh?
Well, you know what? I don’t think so. You obama cult followers are so full of venom and hate for Clinton that you followers scare me. Yes, I fully believe that she should take this to the convention floor and SHE and SHE alone should force this issue. Not a bunch of weepie obama fluid drinkers who continue to be vile and just “plain mean” – remember how the lovely and talented MRS OBAMA spewed her HATE on the Americans with the same words.
Go eat something nasty and die.

Posted by: Lou | May 21, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

I am sick of hearing the same thing. Clinton has lost a long time ago and she is a very bad looser. She should accept the situation and move on. But I think her ego iso big for a women that she prefers to take a part the Democratic Party if she cannot win. I was willing to vote for her at the first time, but her campaign showed me that she willing to do whatever she can to get the power, because she really seeks the power nothing else. And for those who may think differentely, be ready to assume your responsabilities…
Do you remember what happened with W Bush? A half of this country put us in this situation. The problem is not W. Bush but the people that put him in power (same as Adolph Hitler).

Posted by: constantine | May 21, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

“No true Democrat will vote for Obama in the GE.”
Since you’re not ‘a true Democrat’ Libre, please don’t speak for me! Another agent of ‘Operation chaos!’

Posted by: Neider C. | May 21, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

As much as the news media wants us to believe that this is the election for the next President of the United States – it is NOT. It is a competition for the Democratic Party to select it’s candidate to RUN for the President of the United States. The rules that apply for the General Election for President do NOT apply.
That being said, I feel it was inappropriate for the Super Delegates to announce which candidate they would support until they were REQUIRED to cast their vote. With the States votes being so close, it should be up to the Super Delegates to determine who will be the best candidate to represent the Party in the General Election.
The Super Delegates, in their consideration of selecting a candidate for the Party, SHOULD consider the wishes the people of the States that voice can not heard. These people WILL be voting in the General Election for President.

Posted by: TM | May 21, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Hillary Clinton is the Ralph Nader of 2008. She cannot and will not win. She knows it. If the DNC allows HER to make her own rules, to decide how the votes will be counted, to IGNORE the results of the primary, and to say that the entire primary process means nothing…..WATCH HER GO DOWN IN FLAMES. Feminazis and white racists are not enough to win in November.

Posted by: NO WAY SHE WINS! | May 21, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Some are saying Hillary is a liar, theif, cheat, scam artist and pulling all manner of tomfoolery! Others are claiming the same, and worse, of Obama.What do you expect??? They’re liberal Democrats are’nt they?

Posted by: AlchyDave25 | May 21, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Is this woman a fool or just sickkkkkkkkkkkkkk?????

Posted by: charlie brown | May 21, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Clinton’s only hope is for the “Tooth Fairy” to seat Florida and Michigan. Even then I don’t think she’ll find any change under her pillow.

Posted by: Ken | May 21, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

I live in FLORIDA and for the last TIME NO THE VOTES DONT COUNT!!!!!! This woman has really gone BATTY. Blame our governor CHARLIE CRIST. This was a plan by the REPUBLIAN PARTY. Now CHARLIE on McCAIN short list for VP. NO McCAIN/CRIST ticket in NOV. GE. Instead lets show CHARLIE the door on his reelection

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Obama’s one foreign policy experience was campaigning for his cousin Odinga (a convicted felon) in formerly stable Kenya. This occurred as Obama’s Marxist revolutionary cousin had his Islamo-fascist political operatives were busy raping and looting and burning black women and children alive in their church pews. Obama’s new ally (now co-Prime Minister Odinga) has now displaced hundreds of thousands of refugees, burned crops to the point where Kenyans are starving and thoroughly destabilized a pro-Western ally bordered with Islamo-fascist Somalia.
Some one needs to ask Obama to explain and justify his foreign policy allegiance with Odinga.

Posted by: Mary | May 21, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I feel sorry for all of the vendors that Hillary has cheated. She is only continuing with the race to get enough contributions to pay off her debts.

Posted by: juneau52 | May 21, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

So let me get this straight Senator Hillary Clinton,
1. Count all the votes in Michigan, a state in which Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot? (He won Iowa and Illinois, and was close in Indiana, but you think all those people in Michigan would have voted for just you?)
2. No longer count the delegates but now count the popular votes, only if Florida and Michigan are added? If you are so in favor of counting all the votes, as you now proclaim, why did you agree for their removal in the first place?)
3. Let the voice of the racist under-educated white voters (in WV and KY) dictate who should be leading the country for the next four years?
Senator Hillary Clinton, say good bye to any slim chance you had of becoming a VP. Please, where is your conscience?
Amazed and Disgusted…

Posted by: amazed and disgusted | May 21, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

you know why most of Hillary supporters want to vote for Mccain?bc most of them are selfish old women.they don’t care about young men and women who have to go to Iraq and unfortunately dying over there.they just want to revenge.they don’t see the big picture

Posted by: rima | May 21, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

these are democrat White people obama only get 25% of the vote from in nc oh pa wv v — what % of republican white people do u think will support him… toast in a general election… democrats have drank the kool aid

Posted by: f | May 21, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

If Michigan and Florida aren’t counted as originally cast then the other states who changed their dates should be denied their delegates as well. This includes Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. They moved their dates earlier but suffered no penalty. Michigan and Florida were blocked because the election is being rigged to nominate Obama (The Fix). The rules never never said delegates should be denied. They actually said only 1/2 should be counted but that could be changed in the Credentials Committee. The DNC (especially Donna Brazille) used the nuclear option on Michigan and Florida and denied all delegates. Just part of the The Fix. Count all the votes!

Posted by: 2209 | May 21, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

don’t abandon the clintons!!! look what they have done for us!! let barack be vp. he will be ready and experienced in 8 years.. truly he will. send bill over to the other countries to get them back on our side again…he is the only one that can do it..he did it in the 90′s, he can do it again

Posted by: peter | May 21, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Hillary, your argument will work in WV and KY. But not even in Ohio, FL, MI, or CA will anyone buy that fart.

Posted by: Gillis Obama supporter | May 21, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Obama should be asked why he sent a battery of lawyers out to block revotes in FLA and MI that all parties wanted?
Is winning the nomination more important than counting the votes of rank and file Democrats?

Posted by: hopesrpings52 | May 21, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Turns out Obama is only running for President because he was in the wrong line. He thought he was auditioning for American Idol. Now it makes more sense.

Posted by: UNREADY999 | May 21, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Can someone please put Hillary out of her misery!! I am actually sick of hearing her voice. For almost two weeks we barely heard any mention of her name, because she all but finished in this race. I wish the super delegates would just come on and give Obama the 65 delegates he needs so he can start working on the general election.
Hillary has shown that she can not manage the finances for her own campaign and yet you folks that stand behind her want her to run this country??? Please open your eyes and see that she would be a disaster like old Georgie.

Posted by: Nov. 2008 | May 21, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

This lady IS CRAZY. This is crazy she will say and MAKE UP ANYTHING. Now it’s the popular vote. First it was the delegates. Then the Super delegates. She is CRAZY. I cannot she how anyone supports her.

Posted by: nathan | May 21, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

The problem with Obamabots is that they think he is smart. He simply isn’t. I’ve listened to his half-baked platitudes and find them bereft of any rhetorical flair. He merely sounds like a preacher looking for a congregation to flim-flam.

Posted by: Ferd berfle | May 21, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Rumor has it that there is video of Michelle Obama “railing against ‘####’ at Jeremiah Wright’s church.” If this is true, it could be lethal. It’s one thing to distance yourself from your pastor, but quite another thing to distance yourself from your spouse. Again — this might be just be a rumor. Or it might be big — if it’s true. wow… fyi Larry Johnson, is the blogger who has this story and speculation is he will hold the video till August.Maybe that is why Obama is so fired up about any criticism of his wife. Obama knows the video is out there.

Posted by: Harry K. | May 21, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

I WANT TO FIX HILLARY CLINTON FOR STAYING WITH BILL WHEN SHE SHOULD HAVE DIVORCED HIM OVER:
1. HIS ANTIMASTURBATION
2. HIS CHEATING ADULTERY
ALSO IM AGAINST HER NOT LISTENING TO ME ABOUT VOTING AGAINST THE ANTI POKER BILL (PHONE CALLS, LETTERS) AND RECEIVING FUNDING FROM HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES WHEN THEY ARE ALREADY OVERCHARGING AND AGE DISCRIMINATING. I ALSO BELIEVE LIKE JOE LIEBERMAN THAT BILL CLINTON SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED AFTER ILLEGALLY CHEATING ON HIS WIFE.

Posted by: FRANK TELLS | May 21, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

This lady IS CRAZY. This is crazy she will say and MAKE UP ANYTHING. Now it’s the popular vote. First it was the delegates. Then the Super delegates. She is CRAZY. I cannot see how anyone supports her.

Posted by: nathan | May 21, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Even fighters lose. Goodbye Hilary.

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Hey J:
So the fact that Hillary has been “vetted” means that all the sorry deals she’s been a part of…all the scumbags that she has been associated with…all that goes away?
Do you realize how many scandals she and her husband have been a part of? And you think the rev wright deal makes Obama look bad? He didn’t even say those things!
Whitewater
Cattlegate
Paula Jones
Monica Lewinsky
Juanita Broadrick
Campaign contributions from drug smugglers and arms dealers
Renting out the Lincoln Bedroom
you want me to go on? She isn’t “vetted”. She is simply low class slime.

Posted by: bob | May 21, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Clarification since this is often misreported by main stream media. Obama and Edwards both asked for their names to be removed from the Michigan ballot. They were not required to do so by any pledge. The pledge was not to campaign. Just another part of the attempt to rig the election for Obama (The Fix). Clinton didn’t campaign in either state. Obama had ads in Florida and his surrogate (Conyers, Congressman’s wife and bar room brawler) advertised to vote uncommitted in Michigan if wanted Obama. Again the pledge was not to campaign and this included ads.

Posted by: 2209 | May 21, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

I agree with all of the HRC supporters on this site. Hillary should leave and start her own party. The Clintons need to have a party all to themselves, one which represents their interests and their interests alone. HRC’s actions are so blatantly self-serving, arrogant, selfish, one-sided that it’s clear exactly who she represents at this point. It’s not the Demographic that she’s been fooling into voting for her. Just how long is it going to take all of her supporters to realize that she represents just one family? How much more do the Clintons need to say?
How many of you heard Bill’s cackling today, saying what a great President Chelsea would make? Give me a break. The U.S. is not a monarchy and never will be. And if the U. S. were to anoint some family as the “First Family”, it sure as H*LL would not be the freakin’ Clintons.

Posted by: J. T. Bigglesworth | May 21, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

All of you so-called voters say our votes in Florida shouldn’t count. That is the date our state set for us to vote. You either vote then or you don’t get a vote. We just knew that they would have to count our vote at the convention because to not count the votes in all states would not be democratic. We don’t just choose states that will count and leave out ones we think we’ll lose with like Obama did do we??? Have we come to that? Howard Dean wants golden boy and Obama knew he would lose in Florida and Michigan. He thought he made a smart move. If these votes do now count he will not win Fl or Mi. I would vote for Hillary on an Independent ticket and many people would. I hope she does that. The way that the DNC has treated her is shameful. She shouldn’t feel any loyalty to any of them. Obama and McCain would lose to Hillary. All of you Obamabots can stuff this chicago criminal. I will never vote for him. I will vote for McCain at least he is a decent man.

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

The problem with Obamabots is that they think he is smart. He simply isn’t. I’ve listened to his half-baked platitudes and find them bereft of any rhetorical flair. He merely sounds like a preacher looking for a congregation to flim-flam.
Posted by: Ferd berfle | —————
——————–
Yeah I guess at those Ivy league schools they teach you there are 57 states!

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

OBAMA’S GAFFES per Michelle Mailken:
“* Last May, he claimed that Kansas tornadoes killed a whopping 10,000 people: “In case you missed it, this week, there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died — an entire town destroyed.” The actual death toll: 12.
*Earlier this month in Oregon, he redrew the map of the United States: “Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.”
*Last week, in front of a roaring Sioux Falls, South Dakota audience, Obama exulted: “Thank you Sioux City…I said it wrong. I’ve been in Iowa for too long. I’m sorry.”
*Explaining last week why he was trailing Hillary Clinton in Kentucky, Obama again botched basic geography: “Sen. Clinton, I think, is much better known, coming from a nearby state of Arkansas. So it’s not surprising that she would have an advantage in some of those states in the middle.” On what map is Arkansas closer to Kentucky than Illinois?
*Obama has as much trouble with numbers as he has with maps. Last March, on the anniversary of the Bloody Sunday march in Selma, Alabama, he claimed his parents united as a direct result of the civil rights movement:
“There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, Alabama, because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.”
Obama was born in 1961. The Selma march took place in 1965. His spokesman, Bill Burton, later explained that Obama was “speaking metaphorically about the civil rights movement as a whole.”
*Earlier this month in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, Obama showed off his knowledge of the war in Afghanistan by honing in on a lack of translators: “We only have a certain number of them and if they are all in Iraq, then it’s harder for us to use them in Afghanistan.” The real reason it’s “harder for us to use them” in Afghanistan: Iraqis speak Arabic or Kurdish. The Afghanis speak Pashto, Farsi, or other non-Arabic languages.
*Over the weekend in Oregon, Obama pleaded ignorance of the decades-old, multi-billion-dollar massive Hanford nuclear waste clean-up:
“Here’s something that you will rarely hear from a politician, and that is that I’m not familiar with the Hanford, uuuuhh, site, so I don’t know exactly what’s going on there. (Applause.) Now, having said that, I promise you I’ll learn about it by the time I leave here on the ride back to the airport.”
I assume on that ride, a staffer reminded him that he’s voted on at least one defense authorization bill that addressed the “costs, schedules, and technical issues” dealing with the nation’s most contaminated nuclear waste site.
*Last March, the Chicago Tribune reported this little-noticed nugget about a fake autobiographical detail in Obama’s “Dreams from My Father:”
“Then, there’s the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don’t exist, say the magazine’s own historians.”
* And in perhaps the most seriously troubling set of gaffes of them all, Obama told a Portland crowd over the weekend that Iran doesn’t “pose a serious threat to us”–cluelessly arguing that “tiny countries” with small defense budgets can’t do us harm– and then promptly flip-flopped the next day, claiming, “I’ve made it clear for years that the threat from Iran is grave.”
Barack Obama–promoted by the Left and the media as an all-knowing, articulate, transcendent Messiah–is a walking, talking gaffe machine. How many more passes does he get? How many more can we afford?

Posted by: Jerry A | May 21, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

yes, i am sure that if she were winning, she would be wanting to have those votes in florida really count.
She is one of these individuals who cares nothing more than for herself. She is so beyond herself, and she is such a bad witch. I cannot believe this. She is a bad witch, kind of like from the Wizard of Oz, played by margaret hamilton, if I am not mistaken.
She has no shame and no dignity. Why does she not simply disappear. Yes, she won with votes from all those racists in West Virginia and Kentucky. She should not permit those votes — those racially-based votes — to be counted, but again, she and her old man have no shame and no dignity.

Posted by: lavampire | May 21, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

If you Obamabots are looking for change, the most you’re going to get with him as president is in your pockets now.

Posted by: Ferd Berfle | May 21, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

The polls today show BO beating McBush. Once HRC is out BO will get a bump. Not all of the HRC votes will come over but enough will. BO will win.

Posted by: Jim B | May 21, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Hillary, our goal is simply to elect you as the first Woman President of the United States of America. You are a true American who has America’s security first and foremost in mind. Carry on as will we until you are our President.

Posted by: benvictor | May 21, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

the wicked witch once again flies in to florida on her broom to try to stir trouble with her flying monkies. The wicked witch has not dignity and no honor and no shame.

Posted by: lavampire | May 21, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Obama hadn’t even heard about the nation’s most contaminated nulear waste site. Dude, get with the program! We just can’t afford a president right now who has to “google” the critical issues!
“WASHINGTON — Democrat Barack Obama was stumped this weekend when a woman asked him about cleanup at the nation’s most contaminated nuclear area: the Hanford site in Washington state where scientists helped create the atomic bomb.
Obama admitted that he didn’t know much about the problem, but promised he would learn about it.
“Here’s something that you will rarely hear from a politician, and that is that I’m not familiar with the Hanford site, so I don’t know exactly what’s going on there,” Obama said Sunday at a campaign stop in Pendleton, Ore. “Now, having said that, I promise you I’ll learn about it by the time I leave here on the ride back to the airport.”

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 21, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

.
Shameful, irresponsible doublespeak of hussein and his naive followers: “let the people decide” BUT DISENFRANCHISE FLORIDA, MICHIGAN, SUPERDELEGATES AND ANY OTHER STATE OR PERSON THAT MIGHT VOTE FOR HILLARY.
Many Democrats simply do not want the party to make the same mistake twice by nominating another Kerry-like shallow, arrogant, platitude-spouting, gas-bag – who is so mentally deficient from extensive drug use he even has to plagiarize his hollow platitudes!.
The “God D@#! America” crowd will do just about anything to steal the nomination. Kind of reminds one of Dumbya – except more bigoted.
/

Posted by: ALEX H. | May 21, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

If they won’t make any change in the way things are why can’t we count them.

Posted by: Bishop | May 21, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Jerry A:
You can roast every single person who has ever run for, or held a political office. When you speak every day, all day, you are going to make some mistakes. That includes Hillary.
You, on the other hand, are foolish for thinking anybody is buying what you are trying to sell.

Posted by: bob | May 21, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

J.T.BIGGLESWORTH—I AGREE WITH YOU 100%

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Good luck getting Hillary supporters to help your guy. I prefer the hero who loves his country.
________________________________________
Geraldine Ferarro will lead the charge of voters voting for McCain. At a meeting for delegates and alternates last night the genral attitude was “NO way will I vote for Obama” McCain is without question a patriot. Obama is VERY questionable, and he’s toast if he’s the nominee. And to all the men who tell Hillary “Sweetie sit down and shut up”, well…you KNOW where you can go!

Posted by: Texas Lil | May 21, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Hillbones…Now the Florida Goobers and the Michigan Unemployed Factory workers have to be counted? Is this a Flip or a Flop? Gurrrlll….make nice so you can maybe be Vice President! Don’t make him too mad! Didn’t you see that Bumper Sticker: “Bros B4 Hos” ?

Posted by: AnthonDJ | May 21, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Good luck getting Hillary supporters to help your guy. I prefer the hero who loves his country.
________________________________________
Geraldine Ferarro will lead the charge of voters voting for McCain. At a meeting for delegates and alternates last night the genral attitude was “NO way will I vote for Obama” McCain is without question a patriot. Obama is VERY questionable, and he’s toast if he’s the nominee. And to all the men who tell Hillary “Sweetie sit down and shut up”, well…you KNOW where you can go!

Posted by: Texas Lil | May 21, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Bob,
For Obama being a newcomer he sure has a list of his own. Wright, Rezko,Candian Nafta. God only knows what else is lurking out there. I guess we will find in the GE when the Republicans crush him like a bug on a windshield.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Not only the delegate count itsely, but also the momentum and confidence it brings.
If the Florida and Michigan delegates were counted earlier, Hillary could have gained much more momentum, much more confidence, much less media pressure and then the super delegates would have been attrated much more.
The whole thing is wrong. The DNC should be responsible for the history. It’s very clear, we had such a brilliant lady, and her road was ruined by DNC.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | May 21, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

All of you Florida voters…I have a question. Really I do. When was the last Democratic primary held where Florida voters had an IMPACT on the nominee? It may occur to you that despite having cast a vote in primaries past, that you effectively did not elect anyone. It is very clear every since the 2000 election that the political machine in your state is flawed and out of control. Those are your officials. Stop blaming everyone else.

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

All of you Democrats who are sitting on your high horses need to understand that OBAMA CANNOT WIN THE ELECTION WITHOUT FLORIDA. We are a HUGE state and many of us here are mad as hell. I am not an idiot. I realize that MANY people are at fault for this fiasco that left MILLIONS disenfranchised. But if Obama had a single ounce of sense he’d have fought to have our votes count – after the fact or not. He’d still have won the primary nod – what harm would it have done to at least act like he gives a crap about millions of people in Florida and Michigan? But he didn’t and now, the very day that he probably has enough delegates to claim victory, he is here in my home town. Too little too late Obama. All of you can yell and scream that we aren’t savvy or aware of the polital manuevers that went on – feel free. Yell away. You’d have been better off getting outraged with us because if WE don’t vote – YOUR GUY doesn’t win.

Posted by: allie | May 21, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

dem…If we can’t put Hillary in the WH we have to keep Obama out. The result is McCain. It’s thtat simple. No Obama, No Michelle, No Wright, No Ayers bombers, No Farrakhan, No Black Panthers, No Al Sharpton’s, No Rezko’s, No Auchi, No Hamas etc. etc. etc. Not EVER in our White House!!! These people will run the country and Obama will be the puppet!!!

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

CAROYLN–WHO CARES! VOTE McCAIN. HOPE YOU HAVE SOME KIDS THAT CAN GO OVER TO IRAQ TO CONTUINE THE 100 YEAR WAR–LOSER.

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Hillary owes it to the democratic party and her supporters to take the fight to the convention. The country is facing serious problems, electing someone so inexperienced, and left-fringe Obama is silly and dangerous. The fight is worth it.

Posted by: Long-term democrat | May 21, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Bob,
I forgot to add the statement by Michelle about being proud of her country for the first time in her adult life. Real upstanding citizen there and you want that as your First lady? At least Bill Clinton and Cindy McCain have a true love for this country unlike Ms. Thang.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

if they are to be counted there must be new elections, niether florida nor michigan was fair to the candidates. i was a clinton supporter but now since she wants to manipulate the rules,i find this win at all cost attitude both disturbing and divisive.
play by the rules the elections were not fair to any candidate.

Posted by: marty | May 21, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

No matter whoever agreed to it, it was wrong to disenfranchise these voters. Hillary has won the last 7 out of last 10 primaries. She is ahead in the number of people who have come out to vote and this will continue. Obama is a weak candidate. Sweet talking won’t win a general election. Obama’s wife has some very controversial views. Just in the past 3 days, Obama has flip-flopped on a major national security matter. The democratic party has gone too far to the left and will never win a general election if this keeps going. What is the matter with the democrats.

Posted by: Susan | May 21, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

I will not vote for Obama either because according to the majority of post by his supporters, they are the most vile that I’ve seen.
====================================
Very true. That’s how marxists, fascist behave. Independents, moderate democrats, republicans all should unite to ensure Obama does not get to the WH.

Posted by: longterm democrat | May 21, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

BCB-I AGREE. FLORIDA DO NOT KNOW HOW TO HAVE A STRAIGHT ELECTION!!!!!!!! THERE ALWAYS BS AT ELECTION TIME. I CAN SAY THIS BECAUSE I LIVE HERE!!!!!!!!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I try to listen to Obama. I really do. But all I hear is seamless telemprompter preaching. There’s no substance there. It feels kind of good and all, but there’s nothing in it.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 21, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Somebody please explain to me how Mi. and Fl. are Obamas fault. It seems to me that you Hillary supporters are just blaming Obama because it makes you feel good. Instead of blaming the leaders of the DNC in those states, who are the ones at fault.
Just a couple of other things: Would Hillary and her supporters want the votes counted if the tables were turned and SHE was in the lead? and Why didn’t she object to these rules at the beginning of the process?
She knew the rules and AGREED to them PERIOD !!!
I understand that you Hillary supporters are upset and disappointed, but some of these arguments are WEAK and TOOO SAD !!!!!!!

Posted by: AutoCadSkills | May 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Now Obama is willing to discuss allowing these voters to be counted. Wonder why he waited so long. Do you suppose it was because it was to his advantage to get ahead in the public opinion. He has been able to gain a lot of pledges and voters because people just kind of assumed, given the liberal media was constantly saying it, he had won the nomination.

Posted by: Susan | May 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Well i dont understand what everyone sees in Obama.I dont think he cares a thing about the u.s.I’ve always voted dem,but like they say theres a first time for everything.

Posted by: Franklin | May 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

There is nothing ABC news can do to stop Sen. Clinton from becoming President. About three years ago a well known televangelist, Perry Stone Jr., told his congregation that God spoke to him and said Sen. Clinton will be the next President. This information can be obtained from one of his published works on CD entitled “Strange Patterns of Recent American Presidents.” On track 7 of this CD, he tells us that Sen. Clinton will once again be in the White House. So give it up ABC News. And Barack, your days are numbered.

Posted by: brianerickson65 | May 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Dem. Senators, you all know Obama is a below average US Senator, are you proud of being led by him? I can tell, lots of you are more experienced than him, but he is just overly arrogant, overly risky, he dares to come out to run presidential campaign, doesn’t mean he is qualified. Are you feeling comfortable beling led by someone who is less capable than you??

Posted by: golfgirlusa | May 21, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Boy you sure don’t hear Michelle Obama referred to as “the closer” anymore. What happened? Could it be some of the nasty things she said that almost cost her husband the democratic nomination and will certainly cause him to lose the GE.

Posted by: Glenn | May 21, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

This isn’t really an issue about what Hillary or Obama want or would have wanted. These votes should count. Period. It was wrong of the DNC to disenfranchise them in the first place.

Posted by: Susan | May 21, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

How many times do some of you folks have to be reminded that MI and FL WILL be seated at the convention in August. A decision on how to do it fairly, with some just punishment for state leaders for breaking the DNC party rules, will only be made AFTER the nomination has been settled by a landslide of superdelegates coming out for Obama immediately after the end of the last primary state election. It’s so simple, and so obvious! Why can’t you see it too? There is no doubt that they will be seated, BUT only after the nomination process is finalized and settled by the DNC! You can book it!!

Posted by: rco | May 21, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

OBAMA’S PLAN FOR CHANGE IN AMERICA PER HIS OWN WORDS AND ACTIONS:
(1)Raise our taxes and reduce our freedom: “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,” Obama said. “That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen,” he added.” — Barack Obama
(2) Endanger our sovereignty. Obama’s bill S2433 would require the U.S. to initially direct .7percent of our GNP into the United Nations coffers for distribution asthey see fit, for “food” to third world nations. Under earlieragreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with theUN attempting to levy this on all first world nations.The U.N. would have the power to increase this rate of taxation.The U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty overforeign aid by putting it under UN control.
(3) Weakening our national defense in an increasingly dangerous world: “First, I’ll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I’m the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.I will not weaponize space.I will slow our development of future combat systems.And I will institute an independent “Defense Priorities Board” to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production”– Barrack Obama
(4) Increase Disunity: Obama’s words: “White folks greed runs a world in need” plus Obama’s association with: Rev. Wright “God D### America”, Rev. Meeks,Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Raila Odinga* Rabidly anti-Israel Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi., etc.,etc. etc.

Posted by: Sally | May 21, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Longterm: You’re spot on. An Obama administration would be like the Bush administration in its arrogance and incompetence. We don’t need another loser as president.

Posted by: Ferd berfle | May 21, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Americans do not have the moral justification to set rules around the world anymore. The world has followed your primary process and we now know you are no better than Burma or Cuba. You have sold lies to this world and continuously you intend to continue dividing this world. Thank God for the internet, we the people of the world know better. No morals ,not integrity, nothing! and on top of that you all are shameless to come on blogs viewed world wide to air your political opinions ignorantly, without any ingredient of honesty on what perceived right or wrong should be. Clinton has lost ! and she should be honest enough to face it, her supporters are pathological thinkers whose loyalty is with the Clintons not the Entity called America. So much for patriotism ,so much for the pride of being Americans. Shameless folks!

Posted by: American liars | May 21, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

The polls today show BO beating McBush. Once HRC is out BO will get a bump. Not all of the HRC votes will come over but enough will. BO will win.
Posted by: Jim B | May 21, 2008 7:14:23 PM
=================================
How old are you????!!!!! National tracking polls mean nothing much. General election is a collection of battles in 50 states, with a handful of states deciding the outcome. OBAMA is the waekest of the three when it comes to electoral college chances.
Even assuming national polls matter, typically the newcomer liberal candidate leads by 15-25 points at this time before eventually losing to the republican nominee. That’s how Dukakis lost in 1988 to Bush Sr. Obama barely leads or often tied in the national polls. This is before he has faced the ruthless Repub machine. HE WILL BE SHREDDED IN NO TIME. Repeat of George McGovern, Obama will be 40+state loser.

Posted by: long-term democrat | May 21, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Bob,
I forgot to add the statement by Michelle about being proud of her country for the first time in her adult life. Real upstanding citizen there and you want that as your First lady? At least Bill Clinton and Cindy McCain have a true love for this country unlike Ms. Thang.
Posted by: J | May 21, 2008 7:24:00 PM
J: Stop with the attacks now ‘old style politics’ and remember that Hilary and Obama are batting for the same team.

Posted by: No_MI_&_No_FL | May 21, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

If Obama has already won, what’s the problem with counting and seating Florida and Michigan? Regardless of who said what, when, how and to whom just seat them! We all know its the right thing to do. Don’t we?

Posted by: Virginia in NC | May 21, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

I just have to say the comment by READY999 to Carolyn is the type of childish response that makes me embarassed to be a democrat. Simply amazing how immature SOME of Obama’s supporters are!

Posted by: Tom | May 21, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

If Hillary was Obama’s choice for VP I still would not vote for Obama. I would only vote for that ticket if Hillary was President and Obama was vice President. I know I would prefer her to choose someone else but I would at least know she made the major decisions. Obama cannot be trusted with any major decisions. It’s that simple!!!

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Asians for Hillary………..

Posted by: kigwa | May 21, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

For all the democrats that say they are going to vote for McCain, I hope you and your family are in the top two percent of the tax code. Please do not blame anyone but yourself for another 4 years of Rep. rule. It will not be the DNC or the superdelegates that vote, but you alone. I live in Fl and I voted for Clinton. I knew the rules when I voted, the vote did not count. I know many people that did not vote because of this fact. However, I will be the first in line to vote when it really matters in Nov. I can not follow or support someone that wants to change the rules after the fact. Clinton supporters, we lost. They beat us! We all must now be Democrats
I am a democrat and will support a democrat. My family and I can not handle another 4 years of Rep. rule. Obama is my choice now! So before you cast that vote for McCain, think about what you are doing, it not only affects you but the rest of us.

Posted by: Arnold | May 21, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Even Florida and Mich.. Clinton still trails behind Obama. Ref http://www.newsweek.com/id/138109.
Why she is making this argument no body knows, may be to drag the race?

Posted by: Rob | May 21, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Hillary’s supporters want her to fight this all the way to the convention. VP would not be acceptable. Every woman who has had to step aside for a younger, less qualified man would be reminded of that every time they saw the two of them if Hillary was vp. Kerry,Kennedy,Dean and the other elitist losers have only supported Obama because they think they can control him and everybody knows that a Clinton cannot be controlled. They will do what they think is best for the country, balance the budget, whatever, come hell or high water. Whether you like them or not, they stand by their convictions.

Posted by: JKR | May 21, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Hillary Clinton ran such an incompetent campaign that I can’t trust her to be chief executive of the United States. I would vote for McCain before I would vote for her.

Posted by: FilmMD | May 21, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Obama couldn’t fix his racist church and won’t allow all people of the U.S. (all 57 States) to have their vote counted and you think he is going to fix the world? Sounds like a fairytale to me.

Posted by: ChrisA | May 21, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

J: Stop with the attacks now ‘old style politics’ and remember that Hilary and Obama are batting for the same team.
Posted by: No_MI_&_No_FL————-
Oh, it’s ok for you Obama supporters to bash Clinton but as soon as somebody brings up negatives about Obama it’s old style politics. I was answering Bob’s post who listed all kinds of negatives about Clinton.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Obama’s plan to soak the rich won’t work: You Can’t Soak the Rich The Wall Street Journal ^ | May 20, 2008 | David RansonPosted on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:11:25 AM by ReleaseTheHoundsKurt Hauser is a San Francisco investment economist who, 15 years ago, published fresh and eye-opening data about the federal tax system. His findings imply that there are draconian constraints on the ability of tax-rate increases to generate fresh revenues. I think his discovery deserves to be called Hauser’s Law, because it is as central to the economics of taxation as Boyle’s Law is to the physics of gases. Yet economists and policy makers are barely aware of it.Like science, economics advances as verifiable patterns are recognized and codified. But economics is in a far earlier stage of evolution than physics. Unfortunately, it is often poisoned by political wishful thinking, just as medieval science was poisoned by religious doctrine. Taxation is an important example. …Mr. Hauser uncovered the means to answer these questions definitively. On this page in 1993, he stated that “No matter what the tax rates have been, in postwar America tax revenues have remained at about 19.5% of GDP.” What a pity that his discovery has not been more widely disseminated.(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com …
The problem with Obama’s tax policies is that they prevent the middle class and poor from becoming rich.. Obama’s tax plan should be called , “The Rich Prevention Act”. The rich already have their money, it is the poor folk who need income to get rich. Under Obama’s plan of taking the cap off SS and Medicare tax, plus rising the tax rates, he would move the effective tax rate on anything over $200K to about 66% once state taxes are factored in. That means to become a millionaire under Obama, the poor would have to actually make over $3 million.

Posted by: Kay | May 21, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

For all his hollow rhetoric about uniting the country, Barry is certainly unting the opposition (and dividing the democrats). Great, just what we need, another uniterer a la Shrub. I’ll bet honor and integrity are next on his little list of things to pontificate at length about. God help us.

Posted by: Ferd Berfle | May 21, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

It just him me, if there are 57 states, instead of 3 more contests there are 7…lol.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

“CLING ON” CLINTON! DIVISION, EXCLUSION AND SEGREGATION HAS NEVER BEEN HEALTHY TO THIS NATION – HOWEVER THOSE WITH “ENTITLEMENT” WILL PLAY ANY CARDS, RACE, RELIGION, SEX, AGE…… THE BOTTOM LINE QUESTION FOR ALL CLINTON SUPPORTERS ” WILL YOU SEND YOUR CHILD TO DO AN INTERNSHIP IN HILLARY’S OVAL OFFICE, KNOWING THE THE PROFESSIONAL AND EXPERIENCED “FIRST HUSBAND” IS READY AND WILLING WITH HIS “CUBAN CIGAR”, TO HELP? HOW ABOUT ALL THE “FEMINIST” IN HILLARY’S CAMP, DO YOU TRULY ENDORSE “SEXUAL EXPLOITATION” OF SUBORDINATES OR FEMALES? Sincerely, Lake Hart, a Native American Writer.

Posted by: Lake Hart - A Native American Writer | May 21, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

It sure is odd that so many traitorous, racist, ignorant and curmudgeonly evil effets are hanging out here! Only in America can mental-vomit spewers (such as loser Lou, righteous Ryan, and foolish Fers)even dare to spit thier venom. Traitor-one who would turn against his own group (Clinton or I’ll vote Mcsame). Ignorant and/or Racist (Obama….etc. etc. etc.) So hang him for not being Episcopalian! Run his wife up a tree limb (Don’t like what she said or how she looks, or that she’s smart and got money). Home of the Free….uh uh uh. Why don’t you people consider suicide.

Posted by: AnthonDJ | May 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

see the problem with this entire process is that if folks think a candidate cares…then they vote for them. Pie in the sky stuff which is why it is so easy to manipulate the electorate. What do you think the motivation is in tracking the specifics of the black, white and gender vote. It’s divisiveness and as you can see it works. Shame on us. We are so predictable. The realities are this is not the first woman or African American to run for President so why this concentration on who is voting for whom. How many blacks voted for Bill Clinton? It didn’t matter because it was assumed we would. How many blacks voted for Jesse Jackson? It didn’t matter because he wasn’t a threat to win. Where were the cries of sexism when previous women ran for President? Geraldine wasn’t going to win and Shirley Chisholm was not only a woman, but AA as well. It’s funny how voters in like Kentucky cry about Obama not visiting when it is obvious that many of them wouldn’t let a black man step on their front porch. I could care less how people rationalize not voting for someone because of the color of their skin or their sex. Like so many in this country who trumpet the progress that has been made in this country on racial and gender equality, I am not afforded the luxury in pretending that there is much more work to be done. It’s your vote do as you will. However, take responsibilities for your actions.

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Yay Hillary!

Posted by: jeff m | May 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Proud AAA…I just don’t trust Obama or his supporters. The large majority of AAA are racist.

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

TOM===DO THE TRUTH HURTS? TO FOLLOW BUSH FAIL POLICYS BY VOTING McCAIN IS GOING TO HELP END WAR? I DONT THINK SO WITH {bombs-bombs} n office! If all you McCAIN lovers love him so much send your loved ones kids-grandkids over to maintain this {100 years war] Once you see them killed or injured for life[MISSING LIMBS ETC.} DONT BLAME NO ONE BUT YOURSELF. After all this is a war we shouldnt be at.

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Enough already. I’m hearing countless justifications made by Clinton and her supporters concerning various ways that she can steal this election. Do you folk realize how offensive you are? It seems that the CLINTONIAN political philosophy is rooted in the view that the electorate can be convinced of just about ANYTHING if you say it long enough and with a straight face. Here are the FACTS:
1. The RULES of the Democratic Party when it comes to primaries and caucuses is that the candidate with the most DELEGATES wins. Period.
2. Michigan and Florida (yes, my state), broke the RULES and were rightfully penalized. ALL of the candidates, including Hillary, agreed to this. Now we are to believe that her desperate attempt to have all of the votes seated is actually about the disenfranchisement of the people. PLEEEASE! It is about one thing…HILLARY.
3. Because of the above facy NO oNE campaigned in these states, so the election was no more than a Gallup poll popularity contest. Just look at other states where both campaigns went in full bore and campaigned, the vote has always been impacted. Plus, Obama wasn’t even on the Michigan ballot.
4. You can’t claim a popular vote lead without including ANY votes for Obama in Michigan, and then counting the votes in Florida, which were bolstered NOT by intense support of the candidates, but by EXTREMELY important legislation that was on the ballot and drove millions to the polls.
5. Apparently it is PERFECTLY acceptable to play the GENDER CARD for all it’s worth, but if anyone remotely connected to OBAMA brings up race, then they are accused of being racist, sexist, and militant. DOUBLE STANDARD and WE SEE THROUGH IT!

Posted by: Floridian | May 21, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008 7:41:22 PM
Well said. It’s too bad that Sen. Obama hasn’t taken the time to get to know the majority of democratic voters. I think if he’d tried to that, instead of concentrating on turning red states blue, and new voters, I might have voted for him. I gotta say, totally respect his education, but he does come off like a know-it-all intern.

Posted by: bluebird | May 21, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

IF CLINTON WAS IN OBAMA’S FRONT RUNNER POSITION AS IT TODAY, I AM SURE OBAMA WOULD HAVE LONG STEPPED ASIDE FOR THE SAKE OF THE PARTY. I WONDER WHAT HAPPENED TO HILLARY’S EXPERIENCE. GUESS OBAMA WAS LUCKY OR HE PLANNED AHEAD.? WE SHOULD CONGRATULATE THAT YOUNG MAN FOR PLANNING WELL AND SUPPORT HIM INSTEAD OF HATING. THEY SAID BLACK VOTERS PROPELLED HIM, WELL THEY ARE LESS THAN 13% OF AMERICAS TOTAL POPULATION, WHO ELSE VOTED OBAMA THAT HELPED SECURE THE NORMINATION? WE, YES WE WHITES SO ENOUGH OF ALL THIS BLA BLA BLA. HILLARY IS JUST A FEEDING YOU ALL WITH A BIGGER BLA BLA BLA. SHE HAS LOST FOCUS AND HAS BECOME DESPERATE …BE WARY OF SUCH PEOPLE

Posted by: What happened to experience? | May 21, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Why do Obama supporters try and “scare” us into not voting for McCain? They say it would be 4 more years of Bush. Guess what? McCain’s policies are different that Bush’s. Surprise!!!! I guess they don’t understand how to look at policies because Obama doesn’t have any yet.

Posted by: Kevin | May 21, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Lake Hart,
“That is so old style politics”. You can’t bash the other candidate.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Carolyn I am big fan of Clinton. but not fanatic. We are supporters of Clinton, not fanatics.. Open your eyes..
Don’t think with your leg, think with your head.
Time has came to our democratic supporters to rally behind who ever the DNC nominee is.. We need to really behind she/he..

Posted by: Rob | May 21, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Five reasons why Obama should not be president:
1. He is not qualified to be president.
2. The other four don’t matter.

Posted by: Ferd berfle | May 21, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

THIS POST…
Proud AAA…I just don’t trust Obama or his supporters. The large majority of AAA are racist.
1 WORD. I G N O R A N T

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

READY999, what in the hell does “do the truth hurts” mean? Lay off the sauce, it’s still early.

Posted by: Tom | May 21, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

About 26 women have run for US President –(Google it). Victoria Woodhull of Ohio (1838-1927) was the First woman to run for President. Apparently this election is the first of worthy of notice.

Posted by: MSC | May 21, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

If Obama had not been as pompous and actually came out and said “this is what I stand” for and stuck with what he said I might have considered voting for him.
Change and Hope are not going to cure our problems. Fight and determination are what is going to set this country back on the right track.
The other thing that bothers me is the people he has associated with. There are too many unanswered questions for me to vote for him.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

How convenient that Hillary wants to counts states in which either A) Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot or B) many people didn’t even show up to vote thinking it wouldn’t be counted. If she really wanted the “will of the people” to be heard, she’d ask for Obamas’ name to be added to the ballot and ask for a re-vote.

Posted by: Sheila | May 21, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

I’m from Michigan, how is Hillary going to make my vote count for Obama? Any of you Hillary supporters want to answer this one?

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

She’s Vindictive…to the extreme. She’s bitter and it goes beyond President Obama.
You see, the battle she lost with Bill (keeping him faithful — being shamed before the entire world. Even BEFORE Bill was elected, his trists were exposed, (Jennifer Flowers and others before/after her). Why do you think Monica was so bold? She played on his weakness, which is a spirit of lust and lasciviousness.
Once again, Hillary is being shamed before the world by another man. This time a Black man, who has taken the only power she had left as a woman. The power to hold her head up; the power to maintain her dignity, the power to show her face before the world without humilation.
Hillary is fighting ‘men’! Men who shamed her Dreams and made her look foolish before millions. It’s not about sexism, neither is this about the voters who support her, nor other women who aspire for power.
It’s about Hillary’s fallen grace with men. Because of Bill, years of disrespect for her as his wife and as a woman, she tried for the highest power possessed by men only in this country to prove she was the better in overcoming them; stripping them of their virility in leadership.
And she failed and it’s a failure that she cannot comprehend nor cope with, therefore she’s fighting as a woman scorned and using every knife and blade to ‘cut’ President Obama down, because with Bill, these knives have been of no effect.
Spoiled…no Vindictive… yes. She’s fighting all men for what one did to hurt her before the world, as her husband.

Posted by: lauren | May 21, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

MI & FL dems did not break the rules, their republican controlled legistlatures did. Do you want to deprive thousands of dems of their vote because they were minipulated by Republicans? Now who’s the real democrat! Obama did run ads in FL. Obama took his name off in MI because he didn’t want anyone to see what a weak candidate he was in a primary state so early on in the race. Caucus states are easily manipulated by bussing in a lot of aggressive supporters. Neither candidate can come up with enough delegates to win, they both need superdelegates. There are still plenty of undeclared supers out there for Hill and her supporters to win over. We want the strongest candidate to go up against McCain and that is NOT Obama (Selected, not elected).

Posted by: JKR | May 21, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Floridian
Yes they do realize how offensive they are but like Hillary…THEY DON’T CARE!!
Hillary got beat fair and square, by the rules that SHE agreed to. Now her supporters are sulking like BRATS.
Like the kid that has a brand new ball and is all excited to get a game of kickball started, but sucks at playing the game…..so he takes his ball and goes home …….SAD !!

Posted by: AutoCadSkills | May 21, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Let’s look at the trajectory of the Dem primary AFTER the Rev Wright scandal broke, and many switched from Obama to Clinton:
Counting: PA, Guam, IN, NC, WV, KY, Oregon.
Popular Vote:
Clinton – 3,509,668
Obama – 3,216,839
Clinton – 52.2%
Obama – 47.82%

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

tom—i guess you just another uneducated white bluecollar Hillary SUPPORTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Republicans come on this blog tagged operation chaos to confuse themselves not DEMS, We are smarter than your post, you are no Hillary supporters, you are simply republicans but you can not keep twisting the truth, your party has failed Americans and the world. Say your prayers for forgiveness of sins or live with it. But DEMS are taking over. Operation Choas, guess you all are loosing your bearing as well…lol

Posted by: Republicans leave DEM Party alone | May 21, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Sanity Man,
He was stupid enough to take his name off the ballot not knowing what was going to be done later. Sucks to be him.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Lead on Hillary. We’re right behind you. Take it to the convention floor. Don’t even think of releasing your delegates. Hold firm. Obama cannot win in November. The Repukes will eat him for breakfast. Hope with Hillary.

Posted by: Roger King | May 21, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Patty,
You’re obviosuly and idiot! He’s not only leading her with real votes! He’s won 31 states and she’s won 18. You do understand basic highschool math don’t you?

Posted by: roxanne | May 21, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Please give me one reason you all think Obama is not fit to be President of this free nation, just one reason.

Posted by: What is wrong with Obama being President? | May 21, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Jeremy-what you’re saying is that a sample where half of the votes come from contiguous conservative non-diverse Appilation states should choose the Democratic candidate.

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

that’s Hilliary again wanting things to go her way. People can justify all they want why she wants to ‘change the rules’ in her favor. You know good and well if the tables were turned, she would say, ‘No it’s the delegates that count, not the popular vote” she is so idiotic!!!! She want thigs her way. if you listen to her speaches, she plays mind games. have THE NERVE to put civil right movement in her speeche and then use Obama’s name in her speech to appeal to black people. what has she been drinking? She said herself early on that “aaah, those votes in MI and FLA don’t matter” until now, she wants to use them to her advantage. I tell you MIND GAMES i tell you.

Posted by: dwash | May 21, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Let us not forget that Obama and the others CHOSE to remove their names from the ballot. Just as Clinton left hers on, everyone did what they did to gain a political edge.
Believe what you want, but that is the truth and just about every news analyst will agree.
Since Obama ran commercials in FL should those that voted for him not count? In Michigan would it be right to give him all of the uncommitted since there were other Dems running who shared in those numbers?
This is not about breaking the rules or changing them. Years ago this exact same thing happened and the delegates WERE seated. If there is a history of breaking the DNC’s rules, then how can any candidate be expected to take them seriously? Obviously MI and FL did not take them at their word or they would have never changed the dates in the first place.
People need to quit complaining that Clinton is staying in. What about when Kennedy back in 1980 too it all the way to the convention when it was no where near this close?
If she decides to stay in until June or until the convention makes no difference to me. The point is, technically nobody can officially be the nominee until the convention and the official superdelegate votes are cast.
Nobody, the news/supporters/supers should have ever called for anyone to get out. The supers endorsements should not have even made news…many did so for their 10 minutes of fame and/or for political gain. Let me not forget money…Obama gave almost a million dollars total last year to members of congress…specifically he gave 5k to EACH Dem member from NH, SC and IA. It is just wrong no matter who you support. This simply should not be allowed.

Posted by: memyselfandI | May 21, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

She is a lair and sore loser. She lied and cheated in Michigan and under no circumstances should the delegates be seated. I guess the elections were fair by Mugabe’s standards.

Posted by: EJS | May 21, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Lemmings, followers, do what everyone else is doing. Act reasonable, think independantly. What are you sheep. Bush the conservative led you around by the nose and the libral elitist Obama leads you around by your ego. McCain leds you around by your racisim, your gun, & the everlasting war. You just can’t think on your own. Vote responsible, not emotionally. Don’t be a lemming

Posted by: Pat Ward | May 21, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Sanity Man,
Obama lost PA, IN as well. How could he not win in IN, next door to his home state? And PA has a very diverse demographic, and he lost that by over 9%.
Face it, the momentum shifted to Clinton after the Rev Wright scandal broke.
Don’t you find it a bit perplexing that the “presumptive nominee” got his butt kicked in WV by so much?

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Altho this isnt on point, it dose reflect some comments made about Mr.Clinton getting a BJ and then denying it, and complains against Hillary for standing by her man, well if you were in the same position would you admit to your wife that sure you got a BJ, or would you be in denial and hope it went away, would your wife stand by you or throw you under the bus, same as the giver of the BJ would she admit it if it wasnt the president, i surly doubt it, unless like the tramp involved she was after big bucks, she made her killing in one BJ, look at the hookers on the street there out there night after night giving BJ and havnt made one tenth of the money she did, and at the expense of Mr. Clinton..so what he got a BJ i had money in my pocket, jobs were not going away the gas prices were not 4 a galon, milk was not nearly 4 bucks a gallon, food was not a quater of the price it is now, and as to his wife, she stood by him and dose to this day, i say hats off to her she brought her family back together and put in in the past, so all your complaing about the Clintons is hog wash, if the liar Obama gainst the white house, watch the signs, WHITES TO RHE BACK OF THE BUS or water fountains BLACK ONLY, for 20 years he has been brain washed by his mentor and friends, for me i will vote for any name on ballot but liar Obana

Posted by: jim from Pa | May 21, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

She’s one pathetic bitch! She needs to get her considerable ass off the stage!

Posted by: roxanne | May 21, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

There is a simple solution if all Senator Clinton is interested in is seating delegates from Florida and Michigan. Divide the delegates equally or in the same proportion as their current tally between her and Senator Obama. But that is not what they are arguing about. She wants all the delegates for herself to reduce her delegate deficit. Politicians are only interested in self promotion. They do not really care about you and me.

Posted by: worldsam | May 21, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

WorldSsam,
Yeah, nice compromise. Split them equall??? Why, Clinton trounced Obama in FL? Get some sense.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

J – Hillary tried to delete her name from the ballot but did not get the paperwork in on time. She would then be just as stupid but also not very organized. But by Hillary logic it doesnot matter that he took his name off of the ballot, my vote should still be counted. Besides the Democrats that support her like our governor supported moving the primary date up dispite the sanctions.

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Please give me one reason you all think Obama is not fit to be President of this free nation, just one reason.
Posted by: What is wrong with Obama being President? | May 21, 2008 8:00:32 PM—–
1. He thinks we have 57 states
2. Wright
3. Rezko
4. Ayers
5. Michelle
6. Flip flopper

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

“Every vote shall be counted and every voice shall be heard.” EXCEPT: You don’t get to break the rules AND have your voice heard too. This would be creating a special class of people who get to do both. Everyone else MUST abide by the rules in order to have their voice heard. There should be no exception made to accomodate the self interests of the Clintons. They have had more than their fair share already.

Posted by: Justinteim | May 21, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

JIM IN PA—-NOW THAT IS A TRUE WHITE COLLAR BIGOT BLUECOLLAR HILLARY SUPPORTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

On August 2006, the DNC set the rules for the democratic primaries and caucuses. Part of the ruling was that only IA, NH, NV, and SC could hold their primaries and caucuses before Feb 5, 2008. Eight months later on April 27, 2007, the FL Senate approved moving their primary date up to Jan 29 by a vote of 37 – 2. The House passed it on May 3, 2007 by a vote of 118-0. The governor signed it on May 21. The DNC warned FL repeatedly that they would strip them of their delegates. On Jan 29 they voted in their primary to defy the DNC. The DNC stripped them of their delegates. The U.S. Constitution does not regulate how political parties pick their candidates. It only regulates how national elections are held. The DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee will meet May 31 to discuss options.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | May 21, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Hillary supporters:
Send Howard Dean and the DNC a clear message. If Obama wins the Democratic nomination, then vote a solid Republican ticket in November. Vote EVERY Democrat out of office. Now that may seem rather extreme, but we as Democrats need to stand up for our rights and the rights of the voters in Michigan and Florida that are about to be disenfranchised by Howard Dean and the DNC. Howard “Screamer” Dean needs to be FIRED and not allowed to be in politics ever again.
Democrats Arise…stand up for your rights as voters and show the DNC that you’re mad as hell and won’t take it anymore!!!!!!

Posted by: VOTE INTELLEGENTLY | May 21, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

J,
Facts are facts. I am not bashing any one. I do believe in the democratic process, what is the issues? J, do you belie in mentoring and coaching by the leaders in our communities? Why do you think Dr. Lewinsky send his daughter to be interned by the “LEADER” of this nation? It takes a village, a state, a country to raise a child. Sincerely, Lake Hart.

Posted by: Lake Hart - A Native American Writer | May 21, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

I hear people saying how much they admire Clinton’s tenacity, while all I see are her constant prevarications.

Posted by: Richard | May 21, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Proud AAA…I just don’t trust Obama or his supporters. The large majority of AAA are racist.

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Jeremy-PA is an Appilation state. Yes it has two large cities but in between is the Appillations. The large rural vote (same demographics as WV & KY) overwhelmed the two cities. Indiana is very conservative also (in the 1920′s they had the largest KKK members in the US). It is very conservative, but he almost did it. But my point is that your sample is too small and too demographically simiar.

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Obama has taken the high road-Hillary has not.
Obama has won the nomination through the votes/support of ‘thinking americans’. Hillary gets her votes from the senile and stupid. If her supporters jump to McCain its okay they’re he’s kind of folks anyway…
Don’t HATE Obama because he’s half black, vote for him because he’s half white…
Otherwise McCain and Hillary will have no choice but to re-instate the DRAFT to keep fighting in Iraq and starting a war with Iran, while Bin Laden and his terrorists take over Afganistan.
Think

Posted by: oldwhiteguy | May 21, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

AND WHAT’S UP WITH THOSE D@MN PANTSUITS?!?!?!?!?!?

Posted by: AutoCadSkills | May 21, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Sanity Man
Blame the DNC. They created this problem.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

If Hillary thought that MI. and FLA. votes would favor Obama,there is no way she would be demanding that they be counted.It’s easy to win if your name is the only one on the ballot.

Posted by: orange cat | May 21, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Let me think about why I am turning down Obama:
1. Has shown poor judgment, from Wright to using cocaine for years to a PATTERN of being involved with unscrupulous characters…hard to believe when he has not been in politics that long.
2. Is not as honorable as he and others claim. Just look at how he got elected into both his IL and US Senate seats…talk about dirty politics…can’t get any dirtier…and we are talking about his own campaign.
3. Played the race card…just wrong. If you REALLY put all the pieces together and go back to read the various news reports it is quite obvious. He never came out to say that the Clinton’s were in fact, not racists.
4. Member of a “church” that teaches Black Liberation Theology…this is as close as it gets to supporting separatism….not to mention the newsletters and support for those who are against certain groups of Americans…just wrong…it seems to counter everything that Obama claims to be all about.
5. Inexperienced and naive. He even stated a few years ago that he would not be ready to run for President this year…it went against the fact that he believed himself to not be ready yet.
6. He is untruthful…just like the rest. But his campaign is all about a “different kind of politics”….this makes him even a bigger hypocrite than the others. Let’s put down everyone else for playing politics but we do it just the same…just wrong.
7. “the most unknown presidential candidate in history”. This is a fact.
8. Has paid almost a million dollars to Dem congressmen, specifically gave money to EVERY dem member from the early contests in IA, SC and NH. He has a pattern of paying off people…including the supers. This is no spin…it is the truth
What is wrong asked…so I answered. Of course, these things can be explained away. And there are others including money laundering and using his Senate title to pay back favors by obtaining hundreds of thousands in state grant money.

Posted by: Mark in LA | May 21, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

J if you are counting those five factors, then we should equally count Hillary mistakes which can not be numbered. Your reasons can’t bear on pressing issue, so you are way out of line.Shame

Posted by: What is wrong with Obama being President? | May 21, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

WorldSsam,
Yeah, nice compromise. Split them equall??? Why, Clinton trounced Obama in FL? Get some sense.
Exactly. What kind of deal is that? It’s certainly no reasonable person would accept.

Posted by: bluebird | May 21, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

The popular vote thing is crap. The reason we have delegates in the first place is simples 8th grade civics. In order to ensure that the will of the people and not the will of New York, Chicago or L.A. This way, people in the smaller states are forgotten. Why do I remember this from my Jr. High Civics class and a career politician like HRC doesn’t?
This election will be won by the best candidate when the delegates vote. Bottom line, I don’t think it should be this hard to become the nominee.

Posted by: Steve McKenney | May 21, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

A Rasmussen poll on Wednesday found that in head-to-head match-ups in Florida, Clinton beats McCain 47-41, while a match-up between McCain and Obama would result in a Republican victory of 50-40.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Florida screwed up an election – again. Big surprise. Florida needs to pay the price for f**cking up 2 presidential elections and now messing up a primary. When they can get it right and follows the rules, they can play ball. Otherwise, let them go back to their swimming pools.

Posted by: Bill | May 21, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Hillary is right about what should happen in a democracy.
Thing is, the USA is NOT a democracy. It never WAS a democracy. It was never INTENDED TO BE a democracy. The Founding Fathers EXPRESSLY stated IN WRITING that one of their PRIMARY goals was to avoid, in THEIR words, “the EVIL of Democracy.”
It is not a Constitutional Democracy. It is not a Representative Democracy.
It is a Representative Constitutional REPUBLIC.
Democracy IS evil. Under Democracy, the Will of the MAJORITY of the People is paramount above ALL other concerns. The Majority rules, outright.
This nation was founded on the concept of the inherent and unalienable RIGHTS of Personhood. But Rights and Democracy are ANATHEMA to each other. NEITHER can exist in the presence of the other. If people have Rights, then there are things that the Majority cannot do to minorities, and that mean that you do not have a Democracy. If you have a Democracy, then the Majority can do anything, including trampling over the Pursuit of Happiness, Liberty, and even Lives of any minorities they wish, for whatever reason or even no reason at all. Thus, their Rights would not even exist for all intents and purposes.
You cannot have it both ways. Rights OR Democracy. Not both.
It’s no coincidence that in the ENTIRE Federal Government as Constitutionally laid out by the Founding Fathers, only ONE aspect has even REPRESENTATIVE democracy: the House of Representatives.
Originally, the Senators of each State were APPOINTED by the Legislators of each State. That was changed by Amendment, and many (including me) argue that that was a Bad Thing.
The ENTIRE Judicial Branch of the Federal government is appointed for life.
Of the ENTIRE Executive Branch, ONLY the President has even the ILLUSION of being elected by the People (and it IS only an illusion, due to the Electoral College). The Vice President was originally whoever came in second in the Presidential race (and thus was almost guaranteed to be of a different Party than the President — if that rule had still been in effect, either Gore or Kerry would be Veep right now instead of Cheney, and think how much better off the nation and world as a whole would be!), and even today, even post-Amendment, the Veep is little more than just another Presidential appointee, albeit one announced BEFORE the election by each Presidential candidate as his/her “running mate.”
ALL OTHER members of the ENTIRE Executive Branch are Presidential appointees. Period.
This is INTENTIONAL. Our nation is to be guided by several forces, and each is roughly equal but different in what they should do:
• The Will of the People, expressed through the House of Representatives;
• the States, expressed through the Senate;
• the Good of the Nation as a whole, expressed through the Executive Branch and headed by the President; and
• the Law of the Land (with the Constitution as SUPREME Law of the Land), expressed through the Judicial Branch and headed by the Supreme Court.
Sometimes, the Will of the People can be wrong. Really. It can. That’s why the Good of the Nation can veto the combined Will of the People and the States. But, if powerful enough, the Will of the People and the States can override the veto. The Supreme Law of the Land can overthrow as unconstitutional a law passed by the Will of the People and the States and signed by the Good of the Nation. If powerful enough, the Will of the People and the States can amend the Supreme Law of the Land (Constitution).
Checks and balances. None of those forces rules outright. Each has its specific responsibilities: for instance, since taxation and spending most directly affect the People, all appropriations bills Constitutionally must originate in the House, and thus are at least hypothetically originate with the Will of the People.
That Hillary either does not understand this, or does but vehemently disagrees, says more against her than anything else I have seen in this campaign. Her husband also had this failing. I cared not a whit what he may or may not have done in the Oval Office with an intern. But I DID care whenever he said, to most any question asked of him, “Uh, let me check the polls on that.”
NO, Mr. President. It is NOT YOUR job to worry about what the PEOPLE want. That’s CONGRESS’S job (specifically, the House’s, but now unfortunately the Senate’s as well to a somewhat lesser extent)! YOUR job is to LEAD, NOT to FOLLOW! YOUR job is to do what’s RIGHT and GOOD for the NATION, *EVEN IF* it’s UNPOPULAR!
You betrayed this principle most seriously when you signed that bill passed by the Republican “Contract With (On?) America” Congress, disbanding welfare as we had known it. EVEN AS YOU SIGNED IT, you said that it was the wrong thing to do, but that you were only doing what the PEOPLE wanted. NO!! You should’ve VETOED it! EVEN IF the People wanted it! You believed it to be a BAD THING! I personally disagree, but I was not President. YOU were. Doing what the PEOPLE (including me) wanted was NOT YOUR JOB!
Hillary looks to be of the same mold, unfortunately.

Posted by: COMALite.J | May 21, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Obama is doomed.
His hypocrisy is coming out – look at the recent debate over lobbyist ties.
Obama’s image is finally broken, people are seeing him for the hypocrite he is.
He points to past presidents meeting with enemies, but fails to mention the WHOLE ISSUE has been his claim to meet WITHOUT PRECONDITIONS.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

BILL–AMEN. I AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 AND I LIVE N FLORIDA.

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

In 2004 when McAuliffe was the DNC Chairman he lambasted Michigan Senator Carl Levin when Levin tried to have Michigan moved up in the voting season.
McAuliffe made the mistake of writing about it in his book.
“”I’m going outside the primary window,” [Michigan Sen. Carl Levin] told me definitively.
“If I allow you to do that, the whole system collapses,” I said. “We will have chaos. I let you make your case to the DNC, and we voted unanimously and you lost.”
He kept insisting that they were going to move up Michigan on their own, even though if they did that, they would lose half their delegates. By that point Carl and I were leaning toward each other over a table in the middle of the room, shouting and dropping the occasional expletive.
“You won’t deny us seats at the convention,” he said.
“Carl, take it to the bank,” I said. “They will not get a credential. The closest they’ll get to Boston will be watching it on television. I will not let you break this entire nominating process for one state. The rules are the rules. If you want to call my bluff, Carl, you go ahead and do it.”
We glared at each other some more, but there was nothing much left to say. I was holding all the cards and Levin knew it.”

Posted by: McAuliffe flip flops | May 21, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

It really is simple. The people that don’t want Florida and Michigan votes to count are Barack Obama supporters. Personally I think the whole primary election should be a redo and everyone vote on the same day without caucus’s. Just like in a GE. Whoever wins the state is the the winner of that state. See who wins the election. Nothing else could be more fair. Howard Dean would still put Golden boy in though no matter what. I will never be a democrat again if the DNC cannot see how unfair this election has been. I have heard horrible stories about the caucus’s and they should be illegal. Why do we bother to vote if the caucus’s can steal the election by offering girls and booze to come over to their side???

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

He cant win, he has shady associates, he’s a bag of hot air, he’s misogynist, he’s black…blar blar…! I don’t care what any of you Hilary supporters have to say anymore. Because I know after June 2nd Hilary will be kissing Obama’s ass just like everybody else! Obama ’08

Posted by: No_MI_&_No_FL | May 21, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

To: “Obama has already beaten her, and he will do it with one state tied behind his back.” …. That’s NOT what the arrogant “MADE” ‘Superhero’ is saying now: “We will have a majority of the pledged delegates. Obviously, we won’t have completed the nom.process, but I think it’s an important milestone for our campaign.”….and he’s using more words like “if I’m the nominee..” To help put out the fire-lit house his arrogance built.
Stay tuned to the Obamas on ABC.

Posted by: freeman3 | May 21, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

If Hillary was Obama’s choice for VP I still would not vote for Obama. I would only vote for that ticket if Hillary was President and Obama was vice President. I know I would prefer her to choose someone else but I would at least know she made the major decisions. Obama cannot be trusted with any major decisions. It’s that simple!!!

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

J-I’ll give about a third of the problem to the DNC, but most of it to the Democrats in Michigan that thought the primaries would be over quick and moved up their date dispite the sanctions by the DNC. So no one campaigned, no one spent money in the state, I couldn’t vote for who I wanted to, but our Govorner said the day after the Michigan primary that “we made a big difference” and that moving the date was a big success. So we elected them and they did it to us. But evidently electing delegates doesn’t count anyway.

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Oldwhiteguy…
Look at the overall numbers…it is very close as far as the educated/uneducated votes go.
Let me also mention that during the primary, more educated voters cast ballots. The GE is MUCH different. Many more uneducated voters turn out.
As far as I see it, ALL votes count, regardless of your education level. I know MANY people who never went to college and some that did not even finish high school. A large portion of them are very knowledgeable about the issues and are open to new ideas.
Some of the “educated” people that I know are some of the most self-centered and ignorant people around.
Education level means nothing, it is the content of your character.

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Jo, you need to get a life.
Obama ’08

Posted by: JJ | May 21, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

juneau52…What will be Obama’s legacy? The Rezko trial that changed to the Obama trial? Read the Chicago Tribune and Evelyn Pringle. Part 1 thru 4. Coming to a theatre near you in the near future I’m sure!!!

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Maybe the South should split from the Union again. The South with its population of uneducated white trash can have Hillary for president. The rest of us will take Obama.

Posted by: John | May 21, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

These new numbers are quite surprising
North Carolina: McCain vs. Clinton SurveyUSA McCain 43, Clinton 49 Clinton +6.0
North Carolina: McCain vs. Obama SurveyUSA McCain 51, Obama 43 McCain +8.0
This has been a solid red state for a long time, even Bill didn’t win.

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

You are well on the way to the nomination.
As with others, I agree that you have endured unfair criticisms.
To keep the record clear as to the popular vote I am including this:
Barack Obama 16,438,697 (49.3%)
Hillary Clinton 15,734,865 (47.2%)
If Florida is included:
Barack Obama 17, 014,911
Hillary Clinton 16, 605, 851
If Mitcigan is also included,Obama 17,540,022 and Clinton 17,323,142
Who is winnng the popular vote and the delegate count?
Barack Obama

Posted by: peter | May 21, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

John,
Sounds like you would fit right in in the South. You are the epitome of trash.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Nice John…labeling everyone in the South as “white trash”
That says a lot about YOU.
Nobody can respect anything coming from someone that spouts off garbage.
shameful…and he claims to be an Obama supporter. I wonder what he would say to that?

Posted by: michelle | May 21, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

In Florida it was the Republican Govenor Charlie Crist ( who is being touted as a possible VeePee for Mcsame) that caused the primary to be moved so that it broke the Dems rules, so if you want a target at which to vent your spleen Crist and the republicans should be at the top of the list. It would be an interesting vote in Florida should Crist be on the ticket to see if the Florida voters want to put a protest vote to the real cause of their disenfranchisement. I understand the frustration many feel, however we live in a country governed by laws, run ( for the most part) by people who believe in those laws. For the Dems to allow Fl+MI to brazenly ignore those rules and go unpunished is asking for complete anarchy at the next round of primaries. Why should the other 48 states and a number of territories who follow the rules be potentially marginalised because other states decided they could break the rules. If the DNC do not punish those states and in particular do not punishly them strongly the DNC will be ignored by govenors and individual states in the future because those individuals want to play local politics, but choose the national primary stage on which to do it. If that’s harsh then so be it, but any State or govenor thinking of playinf games in future should be aware of the risk they are taking

Posted by: vernonwerge | May 21, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

I quit. I am done. I hope the women and ‘disenfranchised’ start their own party and see how quickly they get a woman elected then. Stop trying to extort the DNC, go your own way and see how many seats you have in Congress. You are right, there is no reasoning with your perfectly circular logic…GO.
Three seconds after everyone else is sure you are gone WE WILL move on without you. NOW WHAT?

Posted by: MrMajek62 | May 21, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

This b*tch is so full of sh*t it’s starting to make me sick. It really is. I’m a life-long democrat and I would gladly support either candidate, but I’m starting to think twice about that. Thank goodness there’s nothing she can do or say that will get her this nomination.

Posted by: Jimmy | May 21, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Peter,
Your numbers are off. Look at real clear politics for accurate #s.
If you include MI and FL, even including caucus states, Clinton is winning.
Sorry.
Please site your source.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

vernonwerge–hitting it on head. RIGHT ON!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

You are not gonna win back the poor, less-educated, bitter people. They will go back to cling their guns and God.
Posted by: lazy to think
Never had them in the first place. Those people vote republican, if they can find their way to a voting booth in the first place, so nice try!

Posted by: Larry | May 21, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Vernon is just wrong…the proposal to move the primary was passed by all, dems and republicans.

Posted by: memyselfandI | May 21, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Popular Vote (w/FL & MI)** 17,242,495 47.5% 17,416,090 48.0% Clinton +173,595 +0.48%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,576,579 47.6% 17,639,952 47.7% Clinton +63,373 +0.17%

Posted by: Jeremy | May 21, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

AutoCadskills,
They look better than those potato sacks Michelle wears.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Good luck getting Hillary supporters to help your guy. I prefer the hero who loves his country.
Posted by: Patty
Hey Patty, who made you the spokesperson for all of Hillary’s supporters? Did she appoint you? If not, and your not the official spokesperson, then guess what? You’re just one vote. Don’t try passing yourself off as a block, especially when the polls are starting to prove you very wrong!

Posted by: Larry | May 21, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

If anyone skipped the primary vote in Florida, then they are not real voters. Real voters vote when they have a chance. Under their state law, that was the only day to vote in a primary. If you don’t vote, you don’t get to complain. Even if it doesn’t count, that is your only legal chance to voice your opinion.
If someone didn’t vote, the the right to vote doesn’t mean much to you. If you don’t use your right to vote every time you have a chance, then you deserve the government you get and you can’t even complain about the elected party.

Posted by: Paul from Texas | May 21, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Oh give it a freaking rest. Uneducated meaning what? Stupid? Unable to think for themselves? Unable to add 2 and 2 and get 4? Unable to work 40 or 50 hours a week to put food on the table and pay the bills? Unable to understand a grandstanding windbag like Obama is not qualified to hold the office of President? Is that what you mean? What is so hard to understand that people do not trust this man? They don’t like him, they don’t see anything in him that they identify with? They don’t believe that he represents their own interests? This is not brain surgery, it doesn’t require a degree in quantum physics to understand that people who don’t vote for Obama, and will not vote for Obama, are voting IN their own best interests! THEY DON’T LIKE THE MAN, THEY DON’T TRUST THE MAN, AND THEY DON’T WANT THE MAN. Its just that simple folks!

Posted by: jdona | May 21, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

MEMYSELFANDI—FLORIDA LOCAL REPUBLIAN PARTY LED BY CHARLIE CRIST WITH A COUPLE LOCAL DEMOCRATS INCLUDING SLICK BILL NELSON{ A HILLARY SUPPORTER}.NOT THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY. I KNOW BECAUSE I LIVE N FLORIDA!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Jeremy – if you also look closer at the Real Clear Politics page you will see that if the “uncommitted” votes in Michigan are counted for Obama then Clinton is still behind in the popular vote. There was a movement in Michigan for Obama supporters to vote uncommitted. HMMMM Hillary has not mentioned that these votes should be counted.

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

God Bless Hillary Clinton
The 44th President of the United States

Posted by: Abe | May 21, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

if you are counting those five factors, then we should equally count Hillary mistakes which can not be numbered. Your reasons can’t bear on pressing issue, so you are way out of line.Shame
Posted by: What is wrong with Obama being President? | May 21, 2008 8:16:57 PM—————
Don’t ask the question if you don’t want an honest answer.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Jeremy – I forgot to say that Obama would be ahead by about 300,000 votes. counting Florida and Michigan but with uncommitted votes as Obama votes.

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

If Hillary is cheated out of the nomination, then the democrats are just as dirty, as the republicans in 2000 election.

Posted by: Art | May 21, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

jdona,
Thank you! Some people just don’t get it. You do!

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Is there something that I missed here? From what I know, Obama’s name even was not on the ballot in Michigan. So how she can claim thoes votes? does anyone here understand the logic for her claim?
Besides, They both agreed once to forget those two states and at that time based on the survay clinton was ahead. how the person who once decided to neglect those people just remembered (after falling behind) that some people are truly living there and their votes should be counted. Do you think such a person who changes the rules of the game that she once agreed, only for the sake of winning, can lead a country like U.S

Posted by: siamak | May 21, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

I feel if they demand the vote to be recounted it should benefit all that is involved. Clinton seems to think if she is going to over-turn this in florida she will win. Not fair Clinton so in my opinion as a tax payer and register voter where we play fair. Sorry but this must not be turned over. It seem its only benefitting you and not all involved.

Posted by: michael | May 21, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

ObamaBreaker – No what my impression of Hillary is “it’s all about me winning my agenda”. When she was inevitable she didn’t mind throwing Florida and Michigan under the bus. But now that she is behind and needs them she is their protector (except for my vote for uncommitted). We need someone who can respect the law, and not twist it to their agenda because that’s what we have now.

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

To Harold….. Residents of the state of Michigan are known as Michiganders or Michiganians………….Not michiganites…..

Posted by: Higgens327 | May 21, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

I think what everyone is forgetting is very simple. It is extremely hard to win an election w/o the support of certain states. These states usually are Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida. I think all the Obama supporters are forgetting that it is difficult, if not impossible to win an election w/o one of these states. Obama lost in all three. They can throw Clinton under the bus, but it won’t erase pure fact. Fact and common sense would show that Clinton is the more electable candidate just because of that fact alone, not to mention several others. If you are going to debate politics, feelings shouldn’t come in to play, facts should. Obama will lose to McCain in those states. Ohio and Florida are traditionally Republican states, so what do you think will happen when the DNC robs them of the candidate they chose?

Posted by: mademoisellebelle33 | May 21, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Clinton’s integrity is sorely lacking. She and Obama agreed to exclude Florida and Michigan but, now, that she could benefit from reversing her decision, avarice has replaced her ethical compass. Because of that agreement (contract) Obama did not compete in Michigan. He has been consistent from the beginning, where she has “flip-flopped.”

Posted by: G | May 21, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Please, this not an election this is a circus with Clinton the ringmaster!!!
We do not get a do over beyond kindergarden. If the votes could be redone in both Florida and Michigan with BOTH ON THE BALLOT then this would be fair. However we the “other” people
(thought we were one nation) went by the rules and voted when we were suppose to. I bet Clinton does everything a little shady. Maybe everyone should think about this.

Posted by: Choctaw5494 | May 21, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

and it is not unfair to seat the Florida and Michigan delegates. Thos states votes matter too, regardless of when they held their primaries, and regardless of what CLinton did or didn’t say in the beginning of the election. I don’t see why when they had their primary matters.

Posted by: mademoisellebelle33 | May 21, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

It appears likely that this thing is going to end very ugly. The Clintons simply cannot end with grace and dignity. They’re going to try to destroy Obama one way or another.
http://www.chron.com/commons/persona.html?newspaperUserId=desperado&plckController=PersonaBlog&plckScript=personaScript&plckElementId=personaDest&plckPersonaPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3AdesperadoPost%3A9f485b5b-e2ad-43a5-acf0-a61f5aec019e

Posted by: White Male Veteran | May 21, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Time to decide if we want to win the White House or not. It’s no longer an Obama-Clinton debate. It’s that neither of them can win the White House without the other. Time to put him first and her second and get to winning this thing for all of us!!! Because John McCain is going to win if we don’t put our two candidates on one ticket and start running the race. Everyone who thinks Obama will recreate these numbers on his own is nuts. Same for Hillary. It took both of them to energize the race. My candidate (that’s her) has won more votes than any other presidential candidate in history (herstory). Let’s get on with it. Obama-Clinton.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Let’s tear her premise about voting right apart, shall we?
1. Were all primary and caucuses open to all eligible voters of any affiliation?
No, so there goes the argument that it’s about having everyone have their vote count.
2. Are all caucus and primary’s reporting their total amount of votes gathered for each candidate?
No. So there goes the argument that the was any legal measuring metric to accurately gauge to actual popular vote.
3. Is the right to vote guaranteed in a Political Party’s candidate nomination process?
No. The Supreme Court has ruled that a Political Organization can elect to use whatever means at it’s disposal to select a candidate to lead it. At no time is there any guarantee that it’s members will actually have any say over this selection. The privilege to vote for one is just that, a privilege. So there goes the whole constitutional right to vote, suffrage, et al arguments that she has been using.
4. Does a Political Organization have the right to apply nominating rules and proper conduct and procedures in which to carry out the nomination process?
Yes. Again, see the Supreme Court ruling that grants a Political Organization the right to conduct it’s internal matters as it sees fit. So there goes the demands that she is placing before the party, as well as the demands that the offending States are using to supersede the ruling of the Selection Committee.
Is there any actual connection to the “hanging chad” incident, Al Gore’s loss in 2000?
No. Again, this is a Political Organization conducting it’s own affairs. This is not in anyway, shape, or form like a General Election, which IS open to all, and the right to vote, if eligible, is guaranteed!
So what’s she got? NOTHING!

Posted by: Larry | May 21, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

She’s got everything if you want a Democrat in the White House. Obama supporters have got to face the fact that he needs a broader coalition than he has. So does Hillary. But together what one can’t pick up, the other one can devour. Let’s get on the road to the White House.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Jeremy – 238,168 people voted “uncommited” in the Michigan primary. It’s very fair to say that those would have been votes for Obama, had his name been on the ballot. That means that Clinton is losing by over 160,000 votes according to Newsweek. Chew on those numbers.

Posted by: James | May 21, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

When Hilary learns how to operate a gas pump, then maybe I will believe that she truly understands the plight of ALL hard working citizens. There are 109 million reasons why I can’t believe this at the present time. Bye Hilary.

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Obama is:
U = Unpatriotic
N = Narcicist
E = Elitist
L = Liar
E = Elitist
C = Calculated
T = Terrorist
A = Ayers
B = Bigot
L = Loser
E = Elitist
What it means is Obama is unelectable!

Posted by: Kenny | May 21, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

My candidate (that’s her) has won more votes than any other presidential candidate in history (herstory). Let’s get on with it. Obama-Clinton.
Posted by: LonghornMama
Again, that is another myth that only Hillary and her supports are propagating. The metrics/math used to arrive at this number that she is using to say that she has won the popular vote is spurious at best, fraudulent at most! When taken accurately, Obama is actually the popular vote LEADER at this moment in time. PR may change that, but that is not the number that is in effect at this time.

Posted by: Larry | May 21, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Since America has historically given its states a say in their governance, if they change something, they have the right. Florida can be seated as is, Michigan done over for fairness sake, since Obama wasn’t on the ticket. That would be the right way to do it. Everyone needs to stop bickering and face reality. No wonder our country is in shambles, no one will just face facts instead of whining over “I want this” and ” I want that” instead of doing what the country needs.
In response to those who say Hillary should have dropped out, etc., that is unamerican. The most prominent reason is that isn’t one of our founding principles, “The pursuit of happiness…” Well Hillary is just doing that, and her personal reasons are her own, no one else’s. Any negativity associated with her doesn’t diminish her right to fight ’til the end. Because I thought that is how America got its start!

Posted by: mademoisellebelle33 | May 21, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Oh Larry – you’re spoiling all of the fun. With cogent arguments that reflect reality what are we to do on these comment pages? DAMN you Larry!

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Hillary has more votes than Obombu, about 200,000. Let the people speak !!!!

Posted by: cindy L. | May 21, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

You can tell from reading these blogs who has experience negotiating terms and agreements. This is now all about brokering a deal on behalf of Hillary Clinton. Her supporters are not going to automatically capitulate to Obama. The DNC could put an end to the bickering right now by declaring this will be an Obama-Clinton ticket. If they don’t reach that agreement, and if we’re not smart enough to come to those terms, the winner will be John McCain.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

I don’t think there will be much of a democratic party left after this election ….Everyone i know is going Independent….What we already know about Obama is real…But just think about this …What if Hillary would have dropped out before all these things had come out About Obama and there were no primarys in Pa, Wv…and Ky….We wouldn’t have known how these voters would have voted and by the way they did …McCain would have won the G.E hands down….So Thank You Hillary for staying in this race because if you hadn’t look what we would have been stuck with with no way of ever getting democratics back in the white house for another 4 years….Hillary 08

Posted by: PCC | May 21, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

There are two democratic candidates left. Both have baggage. However, Hillary is the stronger of the two. Obama’s questions have to do with (1) who he is and (2) what he stands for. Right now, the answers to these questions are vague. He is inexperienced, flip-flops on issues, weak on American history and geography, has relationships with people who are clearly anti-American/anti-white, his wife apparently is not very happy with America, and so on. There is more yet to come about Obama. Hillary has been vetted for years and no one can question Hillary’s patriotism for this country. To me the choice is simple.

Posted by: Susan | May 21, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

did anyone hear Hillary compare our election process to that of Zimbawbee?
It’s stupid comments like that that made her lose the primary…not because she is a woman.
She sucks!

Posted by: girlpower2 | May 21, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

If Obama hadn’t blocked revotes in MI and FL, than we wouldn’t be having this discussion.

Posted by: Hahawrong | May 21, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Demo Rules,
How about we boot you and your ilk out of this country.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

@James,
Only an idiot would take his name off the ballot, an intelligent person would leave her name on the ballot.

Posted by: Josh | May 21, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

The only reason Hillary is where she is, is because the republicans are out in force to back her. They would much rather see her go up against McCain because they know that so many people hate Bushs and Clintons and know that would be McCain’s only hope of even comming close to winning. McCain doesn’t have a chance against Obama unless of course he is stupid enough to run her on the ticket with him!

Posted by: Dave Peck | May 21, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Hilary Clinton should not get the Michigan and Florida votes from the January Primaries totally as she claims. I am quite disturbed at Hilary Clinton’s highly questionable and unfair stance. And she continues to debate just to debate. These are an insult to my intelligence. The more she speaks about this, the more I don’t like her. Her quotes are totally false. With all she has been saying, she has caused even more problems for those states voters. How can she get all the votes she won in Michigan when Barack Obama was not even on ballot??? Even my grandchildren can see this is unfair. I just can not believe Hilary is using this “populist tactic”. She has shown she wants this to benefit “only” her. All of her “political marketing” quotes saying she has received most popular votes is unbelievable!!!! This is a well known divisive untrue marketing tool!! Check with some friendly marketing consultant experts. What an insult to us voters. Does she really think we are that ignorant? Wow I saw problem when she first brought it up. Then went and researched to check on history regarding these primaries. My feelings this was unfair for her to do was quite correct.
If she wins all these votes from Michigan and Florida I will have lost all faith in Democracy. We all play by rules in many different types of events. Once an event is started rules can not be changed. Rules can be changed for future events, but not for an ongoing event.
Principle is principle. Honesty and fairness are important. Anything less is dishonest and unfair!
These states were negotiating move up date since 2002 or even before. They were told not to do. So they decided to do anyway, even when they were warned. Even got it passed in their state legislature. These state representative did not get it done right. And let all their voters down. Voters of these states are who I really feel sorry for.

Posted by: Sharon | May 21, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

mademoisellebelle33 – Michigan cannot have a redo at this time. No one will pay for it (except for a partesan group but do we want partesans paying for an election?). The county clerks say that they can’t handle it on short notice. And after this weekend no one in Michigan cares because Summers are short. Wishing isn’t going to make it happen.

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Obama will not be cheated and should not be cheated. The system of proportional delegates is flawed, but it’s the system Democrats run under. You can understand that the other candidate who is leading in all of the real votes that have been cast equally has a right to say “What about me?” I will not automatically flip to Obama. I think the DNC has been mismanaged the talented roster that began this race. There has to be an equitable solution to what Hillary Clinton gets out of having brought 17+ million people out to vote. Obama can have my vote. Comes at a cost of what Sen. Clinton gets in return.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Lets see, must 6 months ago she said that the votes in FL adn MI should not be counted because they broke the time honored tradition of selecting a nominee. How disingenious is she now!
If I can recall the 2000 elections, out of the votes that could be counted and recounted. Bush won and hence won the FL electoral votes and the election. Gore had more popular votes in the total national counts. Obama has the majority and will have the majority of fairly cast votes according to the democartic rules agreed upon by ALL candidates.
Seems like she is saying the super delegates should take the election away from the winner of the most votes and pledged delegates based on the votes.
She sounds more and more like the GOP and Bushies. While not a Bush in name, she represents the lottery, big money influence pedaling of Washington. Enough of this grab. Its time for CHANGE.

Posted by: scott jeffries | May 21, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

And you wonder why Barak Obama did better in caucuses. Who would like to go to a caucus and face people like the ones in this discussion who think Hillary is a witch and speak with such hate? Don’t you think it would be just a little bit uncomfortable to be around Obama supporters? OR even threatening?

Posted by: annie | May 21, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

If Obama is cheated out of getting the nomination, then get ready for some of the worst race riots in history!
Posted by: Walter | May 21, 2008 8:59:29 PM—————
Gee lets act like a bunch of banshees and have a gender riot if Hillary doesn’t win. Let him have the nomination, he won’t win in November anyway.

Posted by: J | May 21, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Someone tell our ultra-intelligent ex first lady that when there are no opponents to run against as it was the case with Michigan, it’s no longer democracy, it’s dictatorship! And when the entire population of the two states has been told the votes will not count, the democratic process has not been exercised the way it was meant. Hillary, your character has been tested and you’ve shown not just America but the world your true colors:you’re one ruthless politician who see no limit to shrewdness… but the American people aren’t as stupid as you think!

Posted by: Harerta Tesfa | May 21, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Josh – Oh yeah? Well how come the idiot is staring at the finish line right now and the intelligent person is so far behind she can taste the idiot’s wind?

Posted by: James | May 21, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

In response to Bill, (commenting on Hillary’s stance to respect the will of the people through their vote) who wrote:
….NO, Mr. President. It is NOT YOUR job to worry about what the PEOPLE want. That’s CONGRESS’S job (specifically, the House’s, but now unfortunately the Senate’s as well to a somewhat lesser extent)! YOUR job is to LEAD, NOT to FOLLOW! YOUR job is to do what’s RIGHT and GOOD for the NATION, *EVEN IF* it’s UNPOPULAR!
You betrayed this principle most seriously when you signed that bill passed by the Republican “Contract With (On?) America” Congress, disbanding welfare as we had known it. EVEN AS YOU SIGNED IT, you said that it was the wrong thing to do, but that you were only doing what the PEOPLE wanted. NO!! You should’ve VETOED it! EVEN IF the People wanted it! You believed it to be a BAD THING! I personally disagree, but I was not President. YOU were. Doing what the PEOPLE (including me) wanted was NOT YOUR JOB!
Hillary looks to be of the same mold, unfortunately.
___________________
Fortunately for you, Hillary defends Your constitutional civil right to allow you to vote for those in executive offices of this country, and then have your vote actually be counted, as one that reflects your will/choice. Period. Doing that as you did/do in clubs, school committees, adult organizations has never and does not remove any ‘checks & balance’ system in place, that you spoke of. This system still exists & comes into play when passing legislature in this country. Counting and recognizing Your vote for those in office is a separate issue; & does in No way change the balance in power between the 3 brances of govt. The issue of an election, in its truest sense, is to accept and count your vote and mine for the one ‘elected’. For an official to accept &count your vote, with others, does not mean they’re ‘leaning to what is popular; instead of what is best for country’ to do so. No elected official has the right to make a decision about who he or she thinks is or is not best for the country, when it comes to YOUR personal vote. That’s Not an issue they inject that power over, in order to supercede your will. Issues and laws posed by those once they’ve been ‘elected’, then meet up w/the checks & balance system, and those officials may not base support on what is ‘popular’ by the people. These are 2 separate things.

Posted by: freeman3 | May 21, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Hillary or Obama won’t be the nominee until the convention in August. Rev. Wright can drop a dime on Obamanation and it’s President Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: Les | May 21, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

There is nothing about changing rules and role, there is only one clear voice from her heart…. and this>>> The Liberty and Justic for All Americans. We the people living here in Florida are not dead logs so not to be counted our voiceses and wishes.

Posted by: Eden | May 21, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

She’s on the ticket or Obama loses. At some point, the rhetoric has to fade, and this party has to GET REAL. He cannot win with “White Guy X” as VP. The energy that brought out the other 50% of the vote wants Hillary on the ticket. If even 25% of that part of the vote fades, Obama’s a footnote in the history books. But that’s not as bad a place as we will be in if the Dems don’t get the White House back.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

LonghornMama — Hillary is never going to get on board to help Obama and the Democratic party. It’s not in her nature to be a team player. It’s her way or the highway.

Posted by: White Male Veteran | May 21, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

oops I FORGOT HILLARY SUPPORTERS. OBAMA DIDNT BRING UP PAUL VS CLINTON NOR THE CLINTONS NOT FULLY DISCLOSE TAX RECORDS NOR THE CLINTON LIBRARY DONOR LIST WISH WE ALL FORGOTTEN ABOUT.BET McSAME WILL BRING THIS AND OTHER SCANDALS TO THE TABLE. REPUBLIANS WILL TEAR THEM APART!!!!!!!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Hillary—from one woman to another…give it up! You are hurting the democratic party and you are giving women a bad name.
Women will be preceived as brats who will say and do anything to get what they want.
Women will be preceived as vindictive when the don’t get what they want.
Women will be seen as bashing their male counterpart when they lose to them.
So for the sake of not giving us a bad name, give it up, already!

Posted by: girlpower2 | May 21, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

NC Blacks go 92% for obama…that is ok and goes barely mentioned. Kentucky and W. Virginia go 2 to 1 for Hillary, THAT is racist. Revote FL and MI, and while you are at it, ditch the flawed caucass system where Clinton supporters were bullied and intimidated, have an actual election and see who we get. If the argument is that the Dem party can chose their candidate how ever they like, than we need something besides the Dem party against the Republican machine. If only we had known more about Obama before he swindled so many people. Here comes the republicans, 4 more years.

Posted by: Hahawrong | May 21, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Ol’ Hillary is puttin’ on the full court press on Obama. Yeeehaaa! You go girl.
Clinton ’08!

Posted by: Cleatus | May 21, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

@JAMES
The same way Bush got elected, cheat, lie and hide your past.

Posted by: Josh | May 21, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

White Male Veteran –
She wants the job! Why the heck doesn’t he ask her?

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I guess being a racist isn’t considered anti American or unpatriotic? You so called Patriots kill me. I bet you wouldn’t put on a uniform if the enemy stepped on American soil. But you are so quick to support war and question another’s patriotism. Gimme a break!

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Anybody heard the one about women in politics and “EightBelles” the horse?
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Order | May 21, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

There is nothing about changing rule in her tone. There is only one pure voice in her speech and that is: Liberty and Justic for all Americans.
We the people living in Florida are not dead meats so not to be counted of our voiceses and whishes.

Posted by: Eden, Florida | May 21, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

John Pen – Again I live in Michigan and wanted to vote for Obama. Where is my constitutional right to vote for Obama in a fair election going to show up?

Posted by: Sanity Man | May 21, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Wow “Order” — Laughing about the tragic loss of a great animal. What a great specimen of humanity you are. The horse who spectators said ran the race of her life and nearly beat all the boys.
As to women in politics, we own this race, sucker. We will bend it however we like.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

In FL, the republican legislature set the date for the primary. The democratic party in FL had no say in this decision. Obama has turned his back on FL and his polularity is in the toliet. Hillary is the only one that can win for the democrats in november.

Posted by: Johnny in Jacksonville | May 21, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Has anyone stopped to think about the consquences of not punishing MI & FL even a little bit? What kind of precedent does that set? What happens in 4 years when another group of states want to hold their primaries early? Huh? Next thing you know folks will be lining up to vote in primary elections before Santa comes down the chiminey. It would be a royal mess for the whole process. But does Hillary care about that? No. She wants to be president. The rules and the party be damned.

Posted by: James | May 21, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

I am so tired of Hilary. She has no class or grace. She is coming off as very desparate. She should bow out gracefully. However, this is indicative of the Clintons-tacky and tasteless. I am so sorry that black folk ever made Bill Clinton feel like he was the first “Black President.” Hilary and her wife have gone out of their way to show that anyone is expendable in their quest for power and spotlight. I am embarrassed as a woman and hope that poeple do not feel that women cannot be powerful, tenacious and still graceful and glassy.

Posted by: Tired of Hilary | May 21, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

What “popular vote”?!! “Limbaugh Democrats”?
Hillary is despicable. When the popular vote doesn’t count even in general elections (thank you, Electoral College!), claim that it “must be counted” in the Democratic primaries is ludicrous, at best.
Well, once carpetbagger – always carpetbagger…

Posted by: toroid | May 21, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Nominate obama, paint FL, MI, OH, AR, W. VA, KY, red, and then cross your fingers for PA and IN. Clinton, at least those state’s start unpainted and many of them could swing blue.

Posted by: Hahawrong | May 21, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

She was for boycotting when she was ahead. THEY BROKE THE RULES. THEY SHOULD NOT BE SEATED. If she gets her way, they should split them then. Obama took his name off the ballot.
I hate Hillary. She is JUST like Bill. 4 more years- what a freaking joke.

Posted by: lovethecritters | May 21, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Yu al say the Clinton’s are the greatest politicians in the world, but between them they have an impeachment(one of only 2 in U.S. history) and a spectacular failure in an election that she thought she had a divine right to. How many other new standards are you going to come up with to determine the outcome? It doesn’t matterhow many counties Obama lost in Kentucky or WV for that matter. Likewise the overall popular vote is irrelevant. It’s DELEGATES, stupid! If you don’t like the system then try to Obama-proof it in 2012

Posted by: toast | May 21, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Yu al say the Clinton’s are the greatest politicians in the world, but between them they have an impeachment(one of only 2 in U.S. history) and a spectacular failure in an election that she thought she had a divine right to. How many other new standards are you going to come up with to determine the outcome? It doesn’t matterhow many counties Obama lost in Kentucky or WV for that matter. Likewise the overall popular vote is irrelevant. It’s DELEGATES, stupid! If you don’t like the system then try to Obama-proof it in 2012

Posted by: toast | May 21, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Johnnyn jacksonville—FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC SENATOR BILL NELSON A HILLARY SUPPORTER ALSO SUPPORTED THE MOVE!!!! SO DID MICHIGAN DEMOCRATIC GOVERNOR ALSO A HILLARY SUPPORTER APPROVE THE SWITCH N MICHIGAN!!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Why would anyone be so stupid as to throw a temper tantrum and not vote for their party’s candidate just because it’s not the candidate they wanted? I mean, I’m an Obama supporter, but if Hillary actually got the nomination (by the proper process determined by the DNC) then I will absolutely vote for her. And why would anyone be so stupid as to not vote for someone because he’s black – he’s also white! And why would anyone be so stupid as to not vote for a woman simply because of gender? We are so lucky to have two incredibly viable candidates. We should be thanking our lucky stars. Let it all shake out in June and see where everything falls. Michigan and Florida were warned before they held their primaries early that their votes would not be counted and the DNC should hold to that because all the candidates based their decisions on that. Let the chips fall where they may.

Posted by: pris | May 21, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

If Obama goes on the ticket without Clinton, there will be every opportunity to Obama-proof the process in 2012. Because McCain will win.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

McCain will win despite all the nonsense created by our media. The Democrat Majority controlled congress still has us in Iraq and gas prices have gone through the roof under the Congressional Democrat’s watch.

Posted by: Panzer One | May 21, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

James, think of the consequences of punishing the voters in those states for actions that were not their own. Screw the party morons, if we want to take the white house back from the republicans, we NEED those states, and a lot of other ones that Obama can’t win. The party can sort out how to prevent this fiasco in the future after the election. This is about who can win the white house, and that isn’t Obama.

Posted by: Hahawrong | May 21, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Yes…it is delegates now…and the supers will nominate the “winner” come the convention should it go that far.
Well…in the GE it is all about electoral votes and it sure isn’t looking good for Obama.

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

There is only one way Obama can win, cheat. Hillary has more votes, almost a quarter million, if the votes were counted in a fair manner, she would have more delegates. ************Anybody but Obama**********

Posted by: Akitisha | May 21, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

“…we believe the popular vote is the truest expression of your will. We believe it today just as we believed it back in 2000…”
Maybe its because I am a Republican, but every time I hear a politician (usually a Democrat) say something along these lines it tells me they have no idea what the Constitution says, and they have no respect for it either. It isn’t like it hadn’t happened before; I believe 2000 was the 3rd time a President was elected without having the lead in popular votes.
The point is, here is a person who wants to be President, who is sworn to uphold the Constitution (even as a Senator she takes that oath), and who is saying “I don’t care what the Constitution says, I want things my way”. Of course, we already know how she feels about the rule of law (think Travelgate, FileGate, WhiteWater Gate, Bimbo Gate, lies about a VRWC, Vince Foster, Cattle Futures, Rose Law Firm Billing Records, etc., etc.). Why would she let the Constitution get in her way?

Posted by: Nick in Virginia | May 21, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

The real crime is that Chelsea will forever think her mother has somehow been cheated out of something rather than she just lost … the making of another bitter woman.

Posted by: raphaelbonee | May 21, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Obama has won this primary. However, getting rid of the superdelegates and swithing to a popular vote primary AND general election is certainly something to consider in the future. Clinton supporters have the right to vote for whomever they please and Obama may or may not win the general election just as Clinton may have lost the general if she had won the primary. She has VERY high negatives and frankly it’s a real stretch to think she’s a shoo-in for the generals. I do understand Clinton backer feelings though. I can’t in good conscience vote for Clinton or McCain. Clinton just isn’t trustworthy and McCain, in addition to several other factors, carries with him the Republican baggage to include Republican justices, heads of agencies, veto power over Congress… If it were Clinton I would have looked to third party candidates or just not voted in the Presidential general election.

Posted by: Earth | May 21, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Half the country wants Hillary and half want Obama. I will vote for either one since I don’t agree with republican policies. Although I will say that I don’t like the way Hillary is trying to spin this to win.

Posted by: lisa | May 21, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

I used to hate it when the Wicked Witch cackled and rambled on and on. Now I just love it because I know that the superdelegates love it just as much as I do. After the Wicked Witch’s cackling about sour grapes today and Slick Willy touting what a great President Lady Chelsea would make, tomorrow should be a very fruitful day indeed for Mr. Obama. Cackle away, oh Wicked Witch of Arkansas, because Mr. Obama is a mere 60 or so votes from the nomination. A few more crazy rants over the next few days should do the trick. And then all we’re going to hear from you is, “Oh, no, I’m melting, I’m melting ….”

Posted by: J. T. Bigglesworth | May 21, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

How can democrats who supported either Obama or Hillary really be so adamant against supporting the other one. Everyone, including the candidates, agrees that they aren’t that far apart policy-wise, whereas McCain really IS. When it just becomes a popularity contest, we get someone like President Bush, who seemed so gosh-darn likeable to so many people. How about voting based on issues?!
As to this primary mess, there needs to be some compromise to get Floridians and Michigonians to the convention, but it cannot be simply “as they voted,” particularly when Obama’s name wasn’t on the ballot in MI and the states themselves decided to simply flaunt the rules and have early elections. Hillary’s being disingenous here, but she’s right that we can’t just fail to include these states in the national convention!

Posted by: whatever | May 21, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

I agree Haha…it SHOULD be about who will win, but the kool-aid drinkers will never see that.
All one needs to do is to look at the electoral map.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Obama/Maps/May21.html
And Indiana will go McCain…no doubt
And the uneducated voters? Obama supporters want to poke fun at Clinton for getting their votes by a VERY large %…..they will be eating their words.
Many more uneducated voters turn out in the general election.

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Hillary should have the starring role in “The Biggest Loser”.

Posted by: Clayton | May 21, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Akitisha – You don’t even know what fair is.

Posted by: James | May 21, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

I want no part of what Obama has to offer….For someone thats suppose to be well educated … Obama Showed me something different when he decided to stay in a church that G.D America and hates all but whites Just how educated he is ….But he wants everyone to believe That he knew nothing about these kinds of sermons wright is well known for….B.S….Everytime somthing comes out about him he doesn’t know anything about it for a few days.. when the press brings it out then he comes out and still has lied about things till he was caught lieing about it again… Thank You Hillary 08

Posted by: PCC | May 21, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

hillary supporters will never vote for obama if he is against counting ALL votes. just get that into your heads. we don’t want another bush in the wh.
obama has encouraged the media to try to push hillary out before the democratic process ended.
obama is against counting the votes in FL and MI and against holding new elections in FL and MI.
we don’t need no zimbabwe here.
This is America and in America we do
COUNT the VOTES!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Hey, did everyone hear what Florida legislature did today. The national election is on November 4th, but they voted to move theirs up to October 21 because they will have more influence. No one can do anything about it because the constitution protects their right to vote and candidates can win without their state.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | May 21, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

10 reasons not to vote for obama:
Rev. Wright, Farrakhan, Ayres, Dohrn, PLO, Hamas, Malcom X, muslims of America, Resko, Ayres.
Anybody but Obama******************************************************************************************************************

Posted by: Jake in FL | May 21, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Mary,
You are delusional
You think Obama took his name off the ticket because he couldn’t win Michigan???? Are you kidding me?
Have you looked at the surrounding states?
Hillary was the ONLY one who left her name on the ballot just in case she needed to change the rules

Posted by: BK | May 21, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

I agree that the elections were held and in Florida BOTH candidates were on the ballot, the people came and voted, the ballots were counted and certified by the SOS. The only thing missing was the DNC blessing because SOME BODY in charge decided to jump ahead and have FLORIDA be important in choosing the DEM nominee. The DNC should revoke the honors of whoever made the decision and let these delegates be counted fully, DON’T PUNISH the VOTERS! Let Florida be FULLY seated at the convention….now Michigan is a whole other can of worms. Obama did CHOOSE to REMOVE his name from the ballot….political manuever I am sure! I heard he (O) is going to try and contest the final 3 primaries…SLIME TIME!

Posted by: Darla | May 21, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Sorry BK…you are mistaken…
The others took their names off of the ballot for political reasons, the same holds true for Clinton. They all have their strategies and nobody is the worse or better because of it.
That’s what politics are all about…

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Hillary, you have officially become a disgrace to the Democratic Party.
Get out of the way- NOW. Is John McCain paying you to act the way you are?

Posted by: Wayne | May 21, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

MikeMo1947 – Great point!

Posted by: James | May 21, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

UNEDUCATED VOTERS IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE HURTING! REASON IS THEY DONT VOTE WITH COMMON SENSE. NO MAJOR COMPANIES WANT TO OPERATE N THEIR STATES {WV–KENTUCKY} GENERAL ELECTRIC APPLIANCES PLANT IN LOUISVILLE WILL BE NEXT TO LEAVE THAT UNEDUCATED STATE, SINCE THEIR APPLIANCES BUSINESS IS UP FOR SALE!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Obama-Clinton!! McCain is interviewing VP candidates this Memorial Day weekend. If he chooses Romney, the only chance Dems have of winning is Obama-Clinton. If McCain were to choose Condy Rice, the election would be a shoo-in for red states. It’s time to stop bickering and put this ticket in ONE PIECE.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Okay-
This is getting out of control. Everyone take a deep breath. I know democrats can’t be this stupid. This is exactly what the Republicans want. All you hillary supporters…don’t be so closeminded…this was never about Hillary Clinton…and she has said this much…this has always been about you.
All you Obama supporters, this is not about Obama…and he has said this much..this is about you.
If you are a democrat, i know your feelings will be hurt and you’ll get pissed off about it…but it wears off, just like when the Chicago Cubs lose and I say I’ll never route for the White Sox, but if the White Sox are in the World Series…you bet I’m routing for them….UNDERSTAND!
It’s not about the candidate, it’s about the pride that we have for our party! And the democratic party holds much to be proud of…and that is nothing to throw away.
One last point…guys THESE CANDIDATES ARE RICH FOLKS! No matter what, they’re going to be okay with all their millions!
VOTE FOR WHAT IS BEST FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILY…not the candidate that has no idea you exist!

Posted by: letsallgetalongdemocrats | May 21, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Ga …the only one who sounds uneducated on these blogs is you

Posted by: Christel | May 21, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

The Mainstream Media will have to dig themselves out of a big commitment to the Obama-hole if Mich, FL gets counted.
If those little states that voted for Obama got to vote again, I am certain Hillary would be their choice, given Obama’s colored past (no pun intended) and Hillary’s surge in middle-class voters..

Posted by: ebknows | May 21, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Hillary Clinton will take the fight to the convention. If it leads to the loss for Democrats in the fall so be it. If they nominate Obama it would be a well-dserved defeat. McCain is a much better choice for presdient, but tt is ALSO payback time for Moveon.org extremists, scum bags like Chris Mathews, Tim Russert, and other media whores who are in the tank for Obama.

Posted by: voteMcCaindems | May 21, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

1.)
I don’t understand why Michigan and Florida shouldn’t count. Do the voters have say and control over when they are able to vote, or do they need to follow the party leads who set the date?
If that’s the case, then the people of those states did what they had to do, and are wrongly being punished.
2.)
In this Age of Information, are delegates and electoral colleges obsolete? I don’t think they need to speak for me, and clearly all of you have opinions. Tell these “representatives” to step aside.
3.)
Maybe listening more to the voices of the people isn’t such a bad idea, whether it comes from Hillary, Obama, or Mayor Joe Schmo Dingbat. Listening to the people for once would be a great change from listening to the lobbyists, representatives, and deep-pocketed corporations, and a real step in the right direction.
Stop wasting time making a war that doesn’t exist, or need to exist, and focus on things that actually matter.
Blah, blah, blah
Nobody for ’08! They all stink. Start over.

Posted by: Chris | May 21, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

1.)
I don’t understand why Michigan and Florida shouldn’t count. Do the voters have say and control over when they are able to vote, or do they need to follow the party leads who set the date?
If that’s the case, then the people of those states did what they had to do, and are wrongly being punished.
2.)
In this Age of Information, are delegates and electoral colleges obsolete? I don’t think they need to speak for me, and clearly all of you have opinions. Tell these “representatives” to step aside.
3.)
Maybe listening more to the voices of the people isn’t such a bad idea, whether it comes from Hillary, Obama, or Mayor Joe Schmo Dingbat. Listening to the people for once would be a great change from listening to the lobbyists, representatives, and deep-pocketed corporations, and a real step in the right direction.
Stop wasting time making a war that doesn’t exist, or need to exist, and focus on things that actually matter.
Blah, blah, blah
Nobody for ’08! They all stink. Start over.

Posted by: Chris | May 21, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

ALERT ALERT
Movie on Sunday HBO- “RECOUNT”
Must watch. Tell everyone to check it out.
This is a movie about the Florida Fiasco voting between Gore and Bush
This Sunday, May25, 2008

Posted by: Rick from Pa | May 21, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Go to the electoral map of Obama-McCain. Obama is only up in some states like CO and NM within the margin of error. States like WI and IN, Obama is flat even with McCain or behind. As a candidate, Obama cannot win this by himself or with “White Guy (you fill in the blank).” Why should people around the country give two craps if he pulls in Jim Webb? It won’t be the same and it’s not winnable for him. So now the bickering has to stop. Clear heads call for an Obama-Clinton ticket and let’s get to winning. I’ve been in public relations a long time. The Dems are about to get SMOKED.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

IF… If there was an Obama-Clinton ticket does that mean that Obama will have to assume Hillary’s debt through the General Election?

Posted by: The Admiral | May 21, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Thanks for the reminder Rick…I will be watching…
I was GLUED to the Tv during that whole fiasco…

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Obama had his chance to have a revote in both states but they refused. Now they have to live with the only other alternative, which is to count the votes as is.

Posted by: Monique from NC | May 21, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Her bundlers will pay her debt. You won’t have to do that. These are the kinds of stupid things that are clouding our brains while McCain is amassing an army. Let little stuff be little. Be big or go home time!

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Obama Mama…they “changed” the rules before…look it up..
And they ended up seating the delegates..

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

And for today’s events: from the L.A. Times: Hillary’s campaign debt has now soared to nearly $31 million, according to numbers crunched early this morning by The Times’ campaign finance guru, Dan Morain. She spent $28.9 million, nearly $8 million more than she took in. She used personal loans to make up part of the difference. She also delayed payments to consultants. Including the $9.5 million in unpaid bills from April, she owes consultants and other vendors $19.5 million. Not to mention the total $11.4 million she has loaned herself. Gallup Poll Daily tracking has documented a surge in Democratic voters’ support for Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton in recent days, swelling from a four percentage-point lead for Obama during the first part of May to a record 16-point lead for him in polling from May 16-18.
At the same time, support for Clinton among some of her traditionally stalwart support groups — women, Easterners, whites, adults with no college education, and Hispanics — has fallen below 50%.Having previously captured nearly the maximum level of support from black voters, Obama’s latest gains have come from a broad spectrum of rank-and-file Democrats. At least for now, he has expanded his position as the preferred candidate of men, young adults, and highly educated Democrats, and has erased Clinton’s advantages with most of her prior core constituency groups, including women, the less well-educated, and whites. Rasmussen Markets data gives Sen. Obama a 62.1% chance of winning in November”(results are updated on a 24/7 basis by market participants).The Rasmussen Reports Balance of Power Calculator shows Democrats leading in states with 200 Electoral Votes while the GOP has the advantage in states with 189.Gallup Poll Obama 55% Clinton 39% (May 18, 2008). 59 delegates to go for Senator Obama! United Mine Workers endorse Senator Obama. ‘Nuf said!

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

If the DNC wants the Democratic nominee to win the next Presidential election, then it has to find a way to seat both MI and FL delegates. If these two states are not represented at the convention, we might as well concede the election to John McCain.

Posted by: Krishna Baru | May 21, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

WoW! Reading all this venom from Obama supporters is really disgusting. Most of them can’t even spell, these are the educated?
I would like to congratulate all of you for just about clinching the nomination.
It was a great steal!
I, along with all thinking, non kool-aid drinking Americans wish you all the best. We hope you enjoy your short-lived victory as we know that America will never elect an anti-American racist.
We will never Damn America as so many of you seem so anxious to do.
Obama, the great divider. He can’t even unite the party and you all think he can win the GE!
ROFLMAO!!!!!

Posted by: A True Democrat | May 21, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

THE CLINTONS ARE DETERMINED TO BE SPOILERS. In reality, the Clintons have declared war on the Democratic Party, which they have always considered as their personal property to use as they please. Hillary Clinton is threatening to take her fight to the convention in Denver. It is all about the Clintons–their bloated ego and sense of entitlement. Furthermore, they are now inciting older women and less educated and politically uninformed working class (usually more prone to racial prejudice) with highly loaded but subtle suggestions about race, gender and emotion-based populism, knowing they are unable to advance their agenda by any other means. All people of goodwill should see the Clintons for what they are and denounce their divisive tactics–the very tactics that Obama is fighting against. Even while Obama is saying kind words about Hillary, it is becoming clear that you cannot placate or appease the Clintons unless you hand over the nomination to Hillary on a platter of gold! If Democrats are worth their salt, they must rally quickly against this poison of old politics, or they are finished in November. This is the time to do something about. It calls for protest and widespead condemnation! We need a more positive campaign and leaders who are honest and guided by sincere ideals. Let’s not forget the path and contradictions of the Clintons: before they started losing big, they were for obeying the democratic rules, said that the nomination was to be based on delegates won (not popular votes which they now claim by their own weird logic), denounced the working class during the Clinton Presidency (Hillary specifically dismissing their support at Camp David with a foul language I cannot repeat here), they privately disparaged Catholics also during the Clinton Presidency. The Clintons used to talk about a more perfect union and how they participated in the civil rights movements; but when confronted with the prospect of a black man winning over her, the Clintons turned to racial and gender politics to inflame sentiments in poor, rural communities. Behind her continuing venomous tactics in this campaign is her refusal to believe that indeed a black person should be allowed by voters to win over her. Democrats, of all parties, must stand against this type of attitude, and above all the Clintons’ sense of dynasty. We need honest politicians, not egotistical, unethical ones. Thanks America for turning the corner on the politics of division and hate. Thanks for embracing Obama’s broader vision of change!

Posted by: Dr. Sam | May 21, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Demand that the FCC investigates the illegal in-kind camaign contrubutions of MSNBC to the obama campaign.

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

LONGHORNMAMA—A OBAMA/CLINTON TICKET WOULD WORK IF WE CAN GET RID OF BILL!!!!HE IS A DISGRACE TO THIS COUNTRY AND ALSO HIS WIFE AND DAUGHTER. HE SHOULD HAVE NO SAY SO WHAT SO EVER AFTER HE HAVE DISGRACE THIS COUNTRY TO THE WORLD. NEITHER SHOULD McSAME WITH THE SAME POLICYS AS BUSH TO ONCE AGAIN DISGRACE THIS COUNTRY TO THE WORLD.

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

It’s amusing to read the comments of Obamamaniacs that Obama has already “won”. If you get your information from Keith Obamaman in MSNBC this is what will happen- ignorance. Here is a breaking news for you…… Per rule book the nominee is elected AT THE CONVENTION.
Since most Obama supporters are fresh off the College Assembly line, their impression that the Convention is irrelevant to the Nomination process, can be forgiven as simple ignorance promoted by their Messiah.
Nothing could be easier for Clinton, than preventing Obama from securing the Democratic Presidential nomination until Denver. She just has to hang around. Once in Denver, an hour is all that’s needed for unpledged delegates to cast their votes independently of the ever-present media pressure that currently holds the entire country hostage.
Obama cannot withstand another 3 1/2 months of media scrutiny. He would have folded LONG LONG TIME ago if the media had been honest and had exposed him in December.

Posted by: long-term democrat | May 21, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

now it is the popular vote!! how many times she is going to change her story, delegates, electable, experience, popular vote. what is next? who is the most bitch? she can win that easily.
PEOPLE, she can’t manage her campaign, do you want her to run the country. do you want another bush-term? if yes, vote for clinton or mccain and go DEEP_DEEP in the HOLE.

Posted by: jason | May 21, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

obama must appologize for what he is trying to do to 2.3 million voters in FL and MI!
we don’t need zimbabwe here. This is the USA – COUNT ALL THE VOTES!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Hillary has discussed going independent, if she is cheated out of the nomination. The time is ready for an independent to be president. Obama could be an ambassador from Kenya to America.

Posted by: cindy L. | May 21, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Sandy, someone forgot to tell the voting public that Hillary’s base has eroded. Clinton’s popular vote in Kentucky exceeded Obama by a quarter of a MILLION people. Puerto Rico may give her another MILLION votes. She’s not waning, and her supporters are hangin’ in — until we see our candidate receive a position of power to help this nation. She brought out that many people to vote. And she will not be swept away quietly. Her supporters won’t allow it.

Posted by: LonghornMama | May 21, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

J. T. Bigglesworth:
re:Wicked Witch of Arkansas
“Oh, no, I’m melting, I’m melting ….”
The WWofAK hasn’t melted – she was crashed by the Small House of the Prairie… The Small White House…:-))

Posted by: toroid | May 21, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

A true democrat, please tell me how Obama has divided the party, why is it his fault.

Posted by: lisa | May 21, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

A panel at the United Astrology Conference in Denver predicts that Sen. Barack Obama would be the ultimate winner of the presidential contest this fall — but one says there may be a threat to him actually taking office next January.

Posted by: Tony | May 21, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

obama needs to go to zimbabwe if he thinks that we do not count the votes in the USA!
2.3 million people in FL and MI have exercised their constitutional to vote.
obama wants to exclude them from the table because they didn’t vote for him??
we will never vote for obama if ALL votes in FL and MI are not counted EXACTLY the way people voted.

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

JOHN and JEREMY: Did I really just read that those of us in the South are Trash? I think this the the elitism that concerns so many of us.
Actually, Obama did campaign in Florida after agreeing not to.

Posted by: yael | May 21, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

THE CLINTONS ARE DETERMINED TO BE SPOILERS. In reality, the Clintons have declared war on the Democratic Party,
Posted by: Dr. Sam | May 21, 2008 9:48:32 PM
========================================
Dr.Sam,
Kindly Sir, In your erudite post, you have forgotten one very important fact- probably you did so willfully. And that is you should have written that 60% of the long-term core democratic voters have declared war on the “democratic party”.
That would have been an intellectually honest, at the same time a very scholarly observation.

Posted by: long-term democrat | May 21, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Yes Longhorn…she will be up in the popular vote no doubt after Puerto Rico. Sure it may be because of the Hispanic vote…but let us not rule out Larry Sinclair. And the murder of that gay man from Obama’s church doesn’t play too well in all of it either.
I am surprised that the mainstream media here doesn’t pay to give Larry a new lie detector test. The original test did prove that he told the truth about doing crack with Obama. This is no joke either. The objective lie detector administrator showed that he was telling the truth, but Obama’s hired teams claimed the sex part showed deception..but the drug part was true.
Scary stuff….true or not, this guy is not backing down…

Posted by: memyselfandI | May 21, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

obama claims that he wants to ‘unite’ the party but he refuses to count the votes of the democrats in FL and MI.
boy, have we heard the “i’m a uniter’ cd before..
let’s be clear here:
the ONLY reason obama does not want to count the votes in FL and MI is because HE LOST.
so obama’s changhe, obama’s democracy is pretty clear:
you don’t vote for me you don’t count!
WE will not vote for obama.

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

To Democrats: What you need is the strongest nominee who can get the presidency in the fall. Unfortunately,the fact is that you will get nothing without unification. Sadly to say that the unification can be achieved only if your candidate can be proved to be the real strongest nominee after a re-vote in Michigan and Florida.

Posted by: 1+1=? | May 21, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

This is her strong case? This is a joke. We don’t elect presidents by popular vote. Someone should explain to Hillary that we have a republic. Perhaps she doesn’t understand the electoral college system, either. The rules for the Michigan and Florida primaries were set long ago, and she agreed to them, as did the other candidates. She only changed her mind about the rules when she found it in her interest to do so. Of course, she wants to count the votes as they occurred in these rogue primaries. In Michigan, it would mean 0 votes for her opponent. That’s not democratic–that’s a Putin-style election.

Posted by: mary | May 21, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Every vote must count.
Anything less is sheer hypocrisy for the entire world to witness, since the Democratic Party cried, “Foul!, about hanging chads in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election.
Rookie U.S. Senator Obama exercised very poor judgment by removing his name from the ballot in Michigan.
He could have left his name on the Michigan primary ballot, but intentionally decided not to do so.
He gambled that taking his name off of the Michigan primary ballot would not make a difference and lost.
Now Rookie U.S. Senator Obama should be made to fully pay for his losing gamble.
Those who gamble at Detroit, Michigan’s Greektown Casino, MGM Grand, and Motor City Casinos know that every gambler is expected to pay up for making a losing bet.

Posted by: USmarine0331 | May 21, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Just a quick-reminder: “Obama is 50% white” So Earl, no… you will not be thrown under the bus… you’ll just be on it.

Posted by: The Admiral | May 21, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

kitchen and the bedroom….
KITCHEN AND THE BEDROOM!!!!!

Posted by: Order | May 21, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Doesn’t anyone ever ask themselves where we would be in this nominating process if Obama had been vetted in the beginning of the process instead of half way through when we first saw the Reverend Wright tapes? Would he still be ahead in pledged delegates if the main stream media had done their jobs instead of just feeling “tingles” down their legs when he gave a speech?
Obama and Edwards voluntarily took their names off the ballot in Michigan as a purely political move so they would not lose to Hillary Clinton, then they realized their error when she didn’t, tried to get their names back on and couldn’t. Barack Obama’s lawyers blocked all attempts at a revote in Michigan, and the Obama supporters can say anything about it that they want, the voters in Michigan know the truth.
Barack Obama is an inexperienced, arrogant, race-baiting opportunist, and if the DNC and the corrupt left wing of the party continue in their attempt to shove this man down our throats, McCain and the McCain Democrats will paint this country red in November.
There is a revolution going on in this country, a revolution against a biased main stream media, against sexism, against disenfranchising millions of voters, against a corrupt Democratic Party who thumbs its nose at its base and continues on over the cliff without a care in the world for what is in the best interests of this country. Oh, yes, there’s a revolution going on, and it’s a beautiful thing to see!

Posted by: Grammy Barb | May 21, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

long term dem could you please provide me with the site that shows 60% of dems declaring war, thanks.

Posted by: lisa | May 21, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

It’s a sad day in America, when an inexperienced, hypocrite can talk his way to get votes. Obama is one of the dirtiest politicians in the history of Illinois. His past 11 years in politics has no “change” except more lies, deceit and false promises. His past is proof that he does not practice what he preaches. Only the weak minded and mentally challanged will vote for him.

Posted by: Mark P. | May 21, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

NO MATTER HOW HARD I TRY, I FIND IT IMPSSIBLE TO VISUALIZE BARACK HUSSIEN OBAMA LIVING IN THE WHITE HOUSE.LOL

Posted by: andrea | May 21, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

The DNC meeting is taking place on the 31st in DC and it is open to the public

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

so why isn’t the media asking obama:
does obama have a problem with counting ALL votes?
maybe he should be ruling in zimbabwe..

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

“Nothing could be easier for Clinton, than preventing Obama from securing the Democratic Presidential nomination until Denver. She just has to hang around. Once in Denver, an hour is all that’s needed for unpledged delegates to cast their votes independently of the ever-present media pressure that currently holds the entire country hostage.
Obama cannot withstand another 3 1/2 months of media scrutiny. He would have folded LONG LONG TIME ago if the media had been honest and had exposed him in December.”
Amen.

Posted by: Jkan | May 21, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Sorry Demo…I found evidence to the contrary about the food stamps…it is just a story…
When you look at Obama’s timeline it is impossible…seriously.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/when-was-obamas-mom-on-food-stamps?referer=sphere_related_content

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Sorry Demo…I found evidence to the contrary about the food stamps…it is just a story…
When you look at Obama’s timeline it is impossible…seriously.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/when-was-obamas-mom-on-food-stamps?referer=sphere_related_content

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Average Joe—because rules are rules!!!!!!!!

Posted by: READY999 | May 21, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Fact #1:
In a straight contest Hillary would have defeated Obama, the same way she defeated him in CA, OH, PA, NY, TX.
Fact#2:
FL and MI are a mess-up. It’s not the fault of the voters of these states.
Fact#3:
Obama camp DID everything possible to oppose a re-vote since they know fact#1.
Fact#4:
Obama camp knows Facts 1-3 above, still say Obama played by the rules and so votes of these states should not be counted.
Fact#5:
Fair-minded people understand what kind of b.s Obama camp is indulgin in and will ensure the defeat of Obama if he steals the nomination by disenfranchising FL&MI.

Posted by: long-term democrat | May 21, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

the taking heads keep saying that the votes in FL and MI should only be counted if.. can you believe this??
if those votes don’t alter the election?
can you frikin believe these people?
count the votes only if the votes do not alter the election – huh – what are they drinking??

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I love sitting here and watch the dems shoot theirselves in the foot once again. You handed the repubs the last two elections and now you are fixing to hand them another one. And both sides are displaying such childish antics “If Hillary doesn’t get nominated, I’m going to vote for McCain” and the same with Obama’s camp. What a bunch of little crybabies. People it’s about the democratic party not all this racist/gender conflict… soooo keep on keeping on Hillary and I’m sure McCain will send you flowers on the night he’s inaugerated. You ARE beaten Hillary now sit down and have a cookie.

Posted by: Dawn Is Breaking | May 21, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Obama should know without FL and MI, McCain is a winner. You just lost the election for the democrats. Thanks…

Posted by: Sean | May 21, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

My family of 5, wife, and three daughters and extended family of 19 white middle class disenfranchised Floridian Reagan Democrats will become Republicans and vote for JM if BO is the nominee. This man simply does not understand us, our values, and thinks it is cool to diss us and disenfranchise us and to show his arrogance, distain for the strongest courageous woman leader this country has ever seen. The disdain, contempt that the elitist Obama campaign and the Nancy Pelosi run out of touch Democratic party has shown her and the sham treatment the first potential woman president has recieved from CNN, MSNBC and the media are truly disgusting and revolting. Down with the Democratic Party. We need to find an alternative to them, perhaps an independent party with mayor Bloomberg at the helm. Enoguh is Enough. No Obama. There are 19 votes for JM is HRC is not the nominee.

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 21, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

If a someone cheated on a test, do u think it should be counted? Florida and Michigan was told by the DNC, if you changed the date of the elections then it won’t be counted at all. Florida and Michigan didn’t listen and broke the rules. While 48 States followed the DNC rules. So if you are unhappy with it then blame your Florida and Michigan for not listening and following the rules. People who break rules will not be rewarded, and when Hillary agreed to the rules in the beginning and since she is losing now, she want to change the rules she agreed. Stop whining. Is this how you teach your children, break the rules and you’ll be rewarded??? Do whatever it takes to win and losing it not ok?

Posted by: Tony | May 21, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Thanks Admiral.

Posted by: Earl | May 21, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

stop the FRAUD!
over 17million peopel voted for hillary so far.
obama and the sexist talking tv heads are trying to convince the dnc that they should hand this over to obama??
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Sorry Demo…I found evidence to the contrary about the food stamps…it is just a story…
When you look at Obama’s timeline it is impossible…seriously.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/when-was-obamas-mom-on-food-stamps?referer=sphere_related_content

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

there is only one reason obama doesn’t want to count the votes in FL and MI:
HE LOSES if those votes are counted!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

in 2000 we stayed home and watched a democratic election being stolen form the people of this great nation.
obama people be on notice:
we will NOT stay home if the votes in FL and MI are not counted!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Is this how you teach your children, break the rules and you’ll be rewarded??? Do whatever it takes to win and losing it not ok? Posted by: Tony | May 21, 2008 10:07:56 PM
=======================================
We also teach our children, not to lie like Obama and his supporters. We tell them don’t indulge in lawyerly talk, b.s. We tell them you know Obama lost and would lose if an actual vote happened, and since the mess-up helped Obama, they are pretending they are all for rule-0f-law. In summary, we tell our children not to indulge in sleazy Obamia since it’s bad for their health.

Posted by: long-term democrat | May 21, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Another Obama Flub:
“Instead of having all of us pay our fair share, we’ve got over $1 trillion worth of loopholes in the corporate tax code,” he said. “This isn’t the invisible hand of the market at work. It’s the successful work of special interests.” _Obama Source: CNN
Well the entire economy is only around13.2 trillion dollars. Total corporate profits in the entire decade of the 1990’s was only 4.5 trillion dollars. Total annual corporate taxes are just 370 billion dollars or so. My point is only in the Mythical Land of Narnia could those numbers be twisted to equal a trillion dollars in missed taxes on profits unless he wants to own all corporate profits and then some. Even Public Citizen only puts total Corporate Welfare including tax breaks at about 160 Billion.

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Another truth is this (and you all can argue as much as you like about MI and FL): Your homegirl, Hillary, signed and agreed that MI/FL delegates will not be counted during the primaries.. so be reasonable and ask yourselves, “why did she have a change of heart??? Do she really care about the people of MI or FL
or that she thought she would have the nomination locked up by Feb or Mar at the latest?

Posted by: The Admiral | May 21, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!
REALLY ? EVEN IN ZIMBWABWE THERE WAS OTHER CANDIDATE IN BALLOT WHILE IN MICHIGAN IT WAS NOT. THAT is your American democracy ? To have only Hillary on ballot and then have a VOTE . Wow. Why don’t YOU move to Cuba or North Korea then where you can have “elections” in Hillary way?

Posted by: Alex | May 21, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

hillary has won and WILL WIN the popular vote!
that is the ONLY vote that counts now since neither obama nor hillary can reach the winning number of pledged delegates.
FOLLOW THE WILL OF THE VOTERS!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Hillary is getting into Bill’s “freak” money.
She’s REALLY messing up now !!

Posted by: Order | May 21, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Bunk! Look…as voters it is our responsibility to hold elected officials accountable. That’s the problem …we elect them..and then are quick not take the heat when they do not do our bidding. If you vote solely along the premise that the candidate looks like you as opposed to injecting common sense, which has nothing to do with formal education, then bite the bullet my friend.
Florida has a problem and it’s called elected officials. They placed voters in the position they THINK they find themselves. Personally, I don’t think Floridians have EVER had a real impact on the primaries since by Super Tuesday much of this is already decided. If you don’t like what they did, then appropriately place the blame. You can not blame Reverend Wright for everything! I don’t care who wins or how much they win by (like it matters), but I do care that the loser lose gracefully and not place themselves before the Party.
If Hilary were Obama, for a host of reasons, none of us would be engaged in ANY of this discussion. I never realized DEMS had such a difficult time at grasping REALITY. Pull your lever and I’ll pull mines. Whatever happens just happens. Personally, in 40 plus years no politician or his choice of Pastor has done ANYTHING to improve my life. Where they fail year after year, I just keep moving forward as if they don’t know I exist. Which they don’t.

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

All voices should be heard, no matter who agreed to what. If Barack H can’t win FL or MI than so be it. Maybe he shouldn’t be the nominee…

Posted by: KURT | May 21, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Hillary supports can take their votes and do whatever they want with them. Their threats and childish antics are pathetic. The “I’m going to take my ball and go home” routine should end in about 3rd grade for all mature adults. Clearly Clinton supporters don’t fit that mold. But hey wasn’t it Clinton that recently said no to a MI to give her 10 more delegates from that state? Wasn’t it Clinton who agreed not to recognize those votes in Aug ’07? Wasn’t it Clinton who said the votes in MI mean nothing in Oct ’07? Sad and pathetic only applies to her and her supporters. Barack does not want or need your poor sport sore loser votes. Take your ball and go home…

Posted by: Paul from Boston | May 21, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Raleigh Voter,
Very Good Article. I have seen many articles about Obama and his dirty politics. Obama is the “King of Dirt”, but he preaches “change and no more politics of old”.
Obama is a HYPOCRITE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Simon C. | May 21, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

obama WAS on the ballot in MI – you are just another obama LIAR!
obama took his name off the ballot because he saw the polls and he WAS LOSING!
why do you obama people chose to be LIARS??
why do you refuse to tell the TRUTH?
why do you insist that VALID VOTES not be counted??
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

just one more…promise…I have pages of this stuff and only save the facts…I toss away the Muslim crap…I just do not buy into that nonsense..
The Obama spend-o-meter is now up around $800 billion. And tax hikes on the rich won’t pay for it. It’s the middle class that will ultimately shoulder this fiscal burden in terms of higher taxes and lower growth.
The Wall Street Journal’s Steve Moore has done the math on Obama’s tax plan. He says it will add up to a 39.6 percent personal income tax, a 52.2 percent combined income and payroll tax, a 28 percent capital-gains tax, a 39.6 percent dividends tax, and a 55 percent estate tax.
Not only is Obama the big-spending candidate, he’s also the very-high-tax candidate. And what he wants to tax is capital.
Doesn’t Obama understand the vital role of capital formation in creating businesses and jobs? Doesn’t he understand that without capital, businesses can’t expand their operations and hire more workers?
I am a Dem leaning Independent but taxing big business really is not the way to go…except maybe those damn oil companies…
If we subsidize gas and regulate natural gas/electricity, then why can we not do the same when it comes to big oil and gas here in the U.S.? We are taking about a necessity.

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

REALLY ? EVEN IN ZIMBWABWE THERE WAS OTHER CANDIDATE IN BALLOT WHILE IN MICHIGAN IT WAS NOT.
=======================================
OOOOOH, REAAAALLLY? What could be the explanation for Obama camp opposing the efforts of MI legislators to have a revote with both Obama and Clinton’s name on the ballot? New kind of politics???Sleaziest, Chicago thug Axelrod Variety politics.

Posted by: long-term democrat | May 21, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Simon…
I just wish that EVERYBODY knew this and would not automatically assume it to be untrue…
People give Obama EVERY benefit of the doubt and I do not know why…

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Hillary and her supporters should and would fight all the way to the convention. Since DNC and the media are in the tank for Obama, there is no other way.

Posted by: long-term democrat | May 21, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

      “When you look at Obama’s timeline it
      is impossible…seriously.”
      Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008 10:09:59 PM
Your source appears to be confusing the food stamp programs with the AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependant Children)programs.

Posted by: Lee C.  ―  U.S.A. | May 21, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

is there any, i mean ANY obama supporter who wants to join me and say this:
EVERY SINGLE VOTE SHOULD BE COUNTED IN AMERICA!
common, you can do that!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

To Obama supporters
One of your kind wrote this:
‘This whole popular vote thing is ludicrous…..Her supporters are not quite savvy enough to comprehend that, unfortunately.’
This is O’s problem, his campaign and supporters think they are elites who look down on Hillary’s working blue collared supporters. They forget that there are more working class people than the snooty lattee kool aid drinkers. If O with all the backing of the media, is so confident of winning the nomination, why fear Hillary’s hanging on the race? Surely, he can’t be afraid of this little sweetie. She has every right to be in the race so long as he is unable to close the deal.

Posted by: beejay | May 21, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

To those who say Obama needs Hillary’s supporters to win? Yup, true story.
Do you think Hillary might need Obama’s supporters to win? Do you think Hillary needs Obama’s supporters?
Since Obama’s in the lead on ALL counts, I think Hillary camp would need Obama’s camp more.
I’m all camped out, and McCain, unlike Hillary, does not have a MANDATORY healthcare plan. Who do you think I’ll vote for if Obama is not the nominee? Nobody asked me at the poll. I’m sure there are others just like me.
Don’t make me vote for McCain because Hillary wants to cheat and divide the party.
If the party *must* have a woman, Sebelius could be the VP.
Obama/Sebelius ’08!
Proud Black Woman Supporter of and Voter for Obama

Posted by: Faith | May 21, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Thanks Lee…I will check it out. That was not my original link..I could not find it..

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Average Joe… um… not just pledged delegates but whoever has the most delegates (pledged or super-delegates) combined of at least 2,026 votes wins the nomination. The popular vote doesn’t count for anything except for propaganda purposes… it was 2,025 but another vote was needed because a democrat won the northern mississippi congressional seat.

Posted by: The Admiral | May 21, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

This is exactly right. When Barack H saw that he couldn’t win MI, He pulled his name. It would make him look bad.
And he figured it dosen’t matter.
Barack H is transparent as glass . The dems are going to waste a golden opportunity this time around.

Posted by: KURT | May 21, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Eric..The Clinton’s have more money than “GOD”…so don’t worry about them going hungery.

Posted by: orange cat | May 21, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

@Tony,
The republican legislature set the date for the primary in FL. The democratic party had no imput on the decision. If you punish the democrats for the decision of the republican legislature, the democrats will lose the election in nevember. If the democrats lose FL and MI to satisfy Obama, then the democrats will have McCain for 4 years. If you get Obama, then you loose the election.

Posted by: William K. | May 21, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

No way should Florida or Michigan be counted. Both states deliberately broke Democratic Party rules, they themselves voted for, regarding when the primary voting would occur. To now just say, “Oh it’s alright” and let them sit at Convention, shows the Party Leaders have no true authority and ANY state can just do as they please. The citizens of both states will have their chance to vote – - IN NOVEMBER! p.s. Hang it up Hillary! OBAMA IS OUR MAN!!

Posted by: Blaine | May 21, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Average Joe, Obama does want to seat Mi and Fl. But tell me how Mi should be counted since Hillary was the only one on the ballot.

Posted by: erin | May 21, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Posted: Friday, 16 May 2008 11:14AM
Why I’m Turning Down Obama
Steve Corbett Reporting
corbett@wilknewsradio.com
Friday, May 16, 2008
“Operation Turndown” has deep roots in my own personal radical politics.
If Barack Obama is the Democratic nominee for president, I will not vote for him.
I will turn him down.
Judging from callers to “Corbett” yesterday, so will many other Democrats.
Democrats must follow their hearts and their heads.
I’m part of an impromptu movement born of outrage and frustration to which Democratic Party leaders need to pay very close attention. I’m a radical Democrat and proud of it.
Radical politics is one reason why I majored in “Community Development” at Penn State in 1970, after showing up there in September of 1969 with an open mind and a head loaded with ideas – not all of them good.
By November I was on the street in DuPont Circle in Washington, D.C., getting tear-gassed by National Guard troops during an anti-war protest. The next day I watched the attack on the Justice Department. The next year I watched my state cop father show up on my campus in riot gear.
I spent the next 30-some years developing my perspective and my honor as a daily newspaper columnist and broadcast commentator on television and radio.
I’ve learned from it all. I’m still learning.
And all these years later I still value my community development education and my degree from the counterculture school of hard knocks. The lessons of Kent State, My Lai, and the mean streets of Chicago under the first Mayor Richard Daley remain a part of my pledge of allegiance to real change I can believe in.
I’m not some bizarre social isolationist who’s stuck in the past, either. I value lasting friendships with a wide array of people who hold extremely different political beliefs.
I’m even friends with some conservative Republicans.
But in my heart I’m a radical Democrat.
Yet I’m a model citizen who advocates non-violence and negotiation.
Although I would have likely joined the Molly Maguires back when coal barons oppressed my Irish miner ancestors in Northeastern Pennsylvania and I publicly supported the IRA against British tyranny during my visits to Belfast during the war, I’ve evolved into a principled person who values the power of the ballot over the bullet.
That’s why I’ve decided not to vote for Barack Obama if he wins the Democratic nomination to run for president. I’m with Hillary Clinton until the end.
If she loses and Obama offers her a spot on the ticket as vice president, I’ll consider endorsing the ticket. Still, I offer no guarantees and encourage Hillary to decline the VP spot even if she’s offered the job.
Hillary is the strongest, best candidate. Hillary can beat John McCain. Hillary is my Democrat.
Even if party bosses tell me that we must get behind the nominee and that the nominee will be Obama, I have a choice. Even if family, friends and colleagues tell me I’m wrong, I have a choice. Even if you hate my decision, I have a choice.
And I will use it. To do otherwise would violate the principles I work hard to uphold. I’ve made a decision – a well-thought out, reasoned and rational decision.
Besides, I’ve been here before. I voted for Ralph Nader in 2000 and endured the scorn of others who blamed me for the Democratic loss. Don’t blame me, I said. Blame yourselves for not being able to convince enough people to vote for the Democrat.
The same argument holds true today.
Don’t blame me if Obama runs and loses because too many rogue Democrats, independents and Republicans do not have faith in his ability to lead during some very tough and trying times.
Ralph’s running again today.
So are many other candidates you’ve likely never heard of.
America is caught up in a two-party madness that offers voters too few options. The same well-heeled donors contribute cash to both parties and conspire for access that most Americans can’t even dream of having.
What we do have is a choice.
And I’ve made mine.
I’m turning down Obama.

Posted by: memyselfandI | May 21, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

That post is way too long to read.

Posted by: d | May 21, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Clinton only cares about her blind quest for power, she does not give a hoot for the voters of Florida and Michigan. She is a power hungry and selfish human being. She is a disgrace to the Democratic party. Please, Al Gore or someone step in to stop her!

Posted by: bob10001 | May 21, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

I see Obama still sucks and nothing about that has changed..all his little minions squawking like little banny chickens
McCain 08!!!!

Posted by: Vickie | May 21, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Obama opposed numerous proposals to hold new primaries in both states. He was understandably afraid that he would lose again. The math may be with him now, but increasingly, the voters he needs to win in November are not. Polls out today and yesterday show Hillary defeating McCain in Florida, North Carolina, Ohio, Missouri and Arkansas to name a few while McCain beats Obama in all these contests. Obama has said he would make new states like Virginia, Georgia, Nebraska or Kansas competititive, but McCain beats him in all of these states and Hillary does much better in many of them. At least Dems are consistent–we have a knack for nominating losers.

Posted by: NJH | May 21, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

This is for all those HILLARY SUPPORTERS who feel they’re getting back at Obama by going for McCain or not voting at all:
That’s right! Teach him a good lesson by bringing in
4 more years of George Bush’s policies that favor the
affluent! You’ll show that Obama!
Never mind that all these politicians Democratic and Republican are MILLIONAIRES so none of the
issues that affect poor people affect them.
That’s right working class Penn and W.Virginia! Vote for the white guy who’ll keep our troops over
in Iraq, instead of the black guy who’ll bring ‘em home! Oh, you’ll really teach Obama a good lesson!
Who does he think he is? McBush 08!
It’s so scary that we can be THAT dopey.

Posted by: Stan | May 21, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

I have to wonder how the Hillary supporters would react if the shoe was on the other foot – Senator Obama would have been forced out of the race long ago. ABC News blogs are the only blogs I frequent where the anti-Obama remarks are so ugly – even insulting spelling errors or typos. I thought this was a blog, not an English Lit. class. Yes, the convention is the place where the candidate is finally nominated. So, Senator Obama will be formally nominated at that time. For now he is the presumed nominee – just like McCain on the Republican side. Senator Obama needs only 59 delegtaes as of this afternoon to secure the nomination – that is a combination of pledged and superdelegtaes. He will have that by June 3rd. If you believe that the convention is the turnover point from Obama to Hillary you are not rooted n reality. It is not going to happen. Senator Obama is the nominee – live with it or vote Republican – your choice – may your children and grandchildren forgive you. And may God grant that they do not come home in a body bag.

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Obama people are scared to death that the truth will come out. Barack H lost both FL and MI. That is FACT ! !

Posted by: KURT | May 21, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

The Pubs will never go for a McCain/Jindel ticket. It will most certainly go McCain/Crist. Too much change for Republicans for the highest offices of the land if Jindel was on there. They won’t go for that.

Posted by: The Admiral | May 21, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

      “Thanks Lee…I will check it out. That was
      not my original link..I could not find it.”
      Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008 10:23:12 PM
Then know that one does not necessarily HAVE to have a dependant child in the home to receive food stamps.  She might have qualified as a solo even when her parents were keeping Barack in their home.  It would only be fraud if she put him down as living with her in order to qualify when she would not qualify as a solo.

Posted by: Lee C.  ―  U.S.A. | May 21, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Let’s stir the pot and split the democratic party. I think the important question should be, no matter the primary outcome, is what direction to you want this country to go. If Obama wins and Hillary supporters can’t handle the loss and refuse to vote democratic, well the landscape the nation will be on their hands. Bush has done a lot of damage and without democratic leadership in the White House it will continue to be more on the same. Hillary and Obama share the same policy views, with minor differences in there approach. For those angry Hillary supporters, please think beyond your anger.

Posted by: deb | May 21, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Warren5678, What is the point of your post? So because there are 19 people in your family who are all going to vote for Mr. McCain if your candidate doesn’t get the nomination — oops, I mean, if you don’t get your way — then the Democratic Party is supposed to change the rules to keep your family of 19 from bolting. I understand from many others that HRC should leave and form her own party. I’m sure she’d be happy to add your family to her constituency. My family of seven got a huge amount of laughs from your idiotic post. Please make sure to post tomorrow, so we can keep the laughs going.

Posted by: J. T. Bigglesworth | May 21, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Interesting Hate Speech from the Clinton supporters and HRC.
Every time I want to give HRC the benefit of the doubt, her true instincts fight to the surface and reveal their ugly nature.
Translation to what she is saying; Obama is George Bush???
Face it, Obama IS the nominee, so to the obstinate ones who declare they’ll cross the aisle, what are you hoping to achieve for the next 4 years? And if it is Hillary 2012 as you say, do you think the country will be more or less supportive of her?
Your complaints sound like sour grapes.
And the popular vote argument is ludicrous, if you count the caucus states, he’s back in the lead – so does that mean he has more popular votes? If you count Michigan’s uncommitted, all 250,000 of them for Obama, he’s in the lead comfortably, do you count those? Are we worried about disenfranchising those 1/4 million people?
Or is it that HRC supporters really just have no moral high ground to stand on and want to slosh around in the mud?
Just as Obama can’t win without Hillary’s supporters, so to can’t Hillary without Obama’s supporters. Face it, if we want what we say we want – more folks covered with healthcare, an end to the war in Iraq, energy independence, improved education standards, better fiscal prudence…then we need to coalesce around the eventual nominee.

Posted by: Derek | May 21, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

My Friends who are women … Barack Obama doesn’t care about you. Hillary is your only hope and the real winner of your party primaries.
If Mrs. Clinton can’t steal, er, I mean rightfully win the nomination, I can and will take your vote. Or you could just just write in Hillary. That’s OK too.
And my friends in Kentucky and West Virginia, I do not think you want nor can you allow a person like Barack Obama to be your leader. It isn’t right and it is against the bible. I can and will take your vote. Or you could just just write in Hillary. That’s OK too.
Sincerely – John McCain 08

Posted by: John McCain | May 21, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Hillary’s supporters shout all day and night on blogs??? What a JOKE!
I have been following the blogs for months and Obama’s supporters by far have been the nastiest. They are quick to judge Clinton, but when anyone questions poor little Barack, they are the first to cry about it. They have overwhelmed the blog boards.
Guess Obama Supporter that will not vote clinton-ever again must be one of those “uneducated” voters that decided against Clinton and went to Obama’s camp.
Maybe that Kool-aid made him/her smarter…hope, change, we can change the world, hope, change, we can change the world, hope, change, we can change the world…
Sounds like a Coke commercial…oh wait…Coke…lol…that is what Obama snorted for years when he was a young adult…isn’t that a felony???

Posted by: michelle | May 21, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

And will somebody please muzzle Ferraro!

Posted by: Derek | May 21, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Derek…
Pucker, Pucker…the real sour grapes will come from Obama’s supporters when he LOSES…The Electoral map tells a very sad tale…
Obama IS the nominee…hmmm…I thought that will not be decided until the convention…that is unless Clinton decides to drop out…
Come on…get your facts straight about how this is all done…

Posted by: An Independent | May 21, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

I am so sick of that woman!
Like a bad penny she keeps turning up.

Posted by: mike | May 21, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

If the chades were reversed Obama would insist on
counting the popular votes as well.
Face it this a close race, so every opportunity that the Constitution allows should be exercised.
“There can be no real freedom without the freedom to fail.”
Julie Runco, Burbank Ca.

Posted by: Julie Runco | May 21, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

michelle, how old are you….70. Seniors love Hillary because she is old school and seniors don’t like change. Obama supporters don’t have to drink kool aid, although I do like it, to know we don’t want the Clintons back in the white house. And that is the change we want.

Posted by: zz | May 21, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Hillary could care less about “the will of the people” only about her own ambitions. Do you think she would be concerned at all about Florida and Michigan if she was ahead right now? The woman is such a phony and so power hungry that I always have to wonder

Posted by: Olivia | May 21, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

I just have a hard time believing that a Mail In election in Oregon and chaotic caucases are legitimate while 2 million+ votes in Florida and Michigan Primaries are questioned.

Posted by: webSmith | May 21, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Why doesn’t Clineton want every vote count. Clinton would only allow a revote in FL if it was limited to the people that voted last time (when she won). Why is she denying the vote to people who thought it would count and would be done again? Why is Hillary claim all her delegates in Michigan and no one else gets any? 55% vote for her and 45% voted against her, so why don’t their votes count. Why is Clinton not wanting to count the vote in the caucus states? Does their vote not count because these people were civil to each other and don’t have to hide in a voting booth. And don’t give me grief about caucuses because I am a life long independent and each election I decide which party’s caucus I will attend. In all my years (I am 60) I have not witnessed a single time where pressure was put on the participates to vote a certain way. All candidates have a person give a five minute speech as to why their candidate is the best. In fact, I don’t remember any of these persons saying anything negative against candidates in their own party. They do attach the other party. We even get to hang around if we want and make proposals, discuss, and vote on the party platform. All in big open rooms in schools and churches. So why is Clinton against these people getting their vote counted.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | May 21, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Actually I am in my 30′s…I like kool-aid too…just not the kind Obama’s supporters are drinking..
It obviously makes them blind to any of the negative aspects of Obama, that many of us are well aware of…
And I am not talking about him being a Muslim, lapel pins, or even Wright…
Hope, Change, We Can Change The World…No thank you…
Just say NOBAMA

Posted by: michelle | May 21, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

And people think Clinton is a “dirty” campaigner….
http://uspolitics.about.com/b/2008/03/29/obama-king-leadership-pacs.htm

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 21, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

COUNT ALL VOTES IN FL AND MI!!
ALLOCATE NOTHING LESS THAN ALL DELEGATES!
anything else and the DNC could write off 17 million people and move them into mccain’s column – at least, mccain has not stolen any votes yet..
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Florida votes must count and yes the the republican controlled House (44D & 77R) and republican controlled Senate 14D & 26R voted to change the primary date. Was this done to have these delegates and votes voided?? Michigan on the other hand needed Democratic votes to change their primary.

Posted by: Terry Mason | May 21, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

ALL VOTES IN FL AND MI!
ALL DELEGATES – accept nothing else.
IT IS OUR COUNTRY _ OUR VOTES!
obama is afraid he is losing because more people voted for hillary!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

I understand that FL should count in some way. However, MI is a completely different story. Senator Obama and John Edwards both took their names off the ballot because they knew the votes would not count according to the pledge all THREE of them signed. Only dear Hillary left her name on the ballot. Now I understand why. Go ahead – vote for McCain because you cannot support the Democratic candidate. 70% of Deemocrats would vote for Hillary if she was the candidate. Her supporters are not as loyal to the party. BTW, Senator Obama, in the most recent national Gallup poll, leads both Hillary and McCain.

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Obama / Rev. Wright in ’08
Don’t you feel the warmth, GD America to you.

Posted by: Richard | May 21, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

why are the obama supporters trying to push this country down the zimbabwe’s way??
WHY????????????
ALL VOTES ALL DELGATES in MI and FL!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

I have noticed that there is an objection being floated around by people who think that Hillary shouldn’t get to count Michigan votes because there were no other significant candidates on the ballot.  They think that Hillary’s vote should be reduced by the “undecided” vote in Michigan.  This would reduce Hillary’s popular vote total to the point she could no longer claim to be in the lead in popular votes.
I have a modest proposal that should get us past this little problem.  Simply count New York State twice in lieu of counting Michigan.  Hillary won NY by 317,477 votes.  That, plus Florida, would give her a solid lead in popular votes.  And the NY state primary has the additional advantage of having been held on Super Tuesday in full compliance with the applicable rules of the DNC.
I’m sure the Hillary supporters of Michigan would consider this an acceptable alternative, and could happily vote for Hillary in the general election.
Go Hillary!!

Posted by: Go Hillary!! | May 21, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Why can’t Hillary seal the deal?

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

is mccain better than the zimbabwe regime? you bet!
ALL VOTES ALL DELGATES in MI and FL!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Obama supporters.
Please get a grip. Hillary supporters are not crossing the aisle because we are sore losers. We are Democrats and very experienced at losing, so it is not a big deal.
We will not vote for Obama because he is a despicable, anti-American, racist liar.
How you can all ignore all his evils while harping on things like Hillary’s pantsuits is beyond me.
You should all consider yourselves very lucky that we true Americans are saving you from yourselves.
As I have stated before, honorable candidates Gore and Kerry, who the party was wholly united behind, lost the White House in 2000 & 2004. Half of the party will not vote for this liar.
This separatist does not stand the slightest chance of being elected POTUS.
Thank God. Surely, God will Bless America and protect her from Obama supporters who wish to damn her.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Obama supporters.
Please get a grip. Hillary supporters are not crossing the aisle because we are sore losers. We are Democrats and very experienced at losing, so it is not a big deal.
We will not vote for Obama because he is a despicable, anti-American, racist liar.
How you can all ignore all his evils while harping on things like Hillary’s pantsuits is beyond me.
You should all consider yourselves very lucky that we true Americans are saving you from yourselves.
As I have stated before, honorable candidates Gore and Kerry, who the party was wholly united behind, lost the White House in 2000 & 2004. Half of the party will not vote for this liar.
This separatist does not stand the slightest chance of being elected POTUS.
Thank God. Surely, God will Bless America and protect her from Obama supporters who wish to damn her.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Averagejoe, calm down. Fl and Mi will be counted. But Hillary can’t claim all the popular vote in Mi.

Posted by: erin | May 21, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

For all those who sit in judgement of Senator Obamas character because he was a member of Reverend Wrights church, I sincerely hope you all accept responsibility for all the wrongs that your family & friends have done in all the years that you have associated with them.

Posted by: woman46 | May 21, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

I was for Hillary but was considering voting for Obama until I heard about his pastor and watched the View and heard Whoopi explain that white people just don’t understand. I do understand and Obama does not have enough experience to run this country. Reading the above comments it becomes apparent that many others feel the same. If all votes are not conted (don’t we preach to every other country about the democratic process of every vote counts) I will vote for McCain and probably will if Obama is the canidate.
I am a educated woman who has a choice

Posted by: womanwhocares | May 21, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

I think Clintons are o longer democrats they are now looking for victory as if the are in Pakistan, Iran, Egypt, Sudan,North Korea, Republic of Togo, but i knows the reason why it’s so, had Obama look like John Edward or even look like Mr Maccine she whould have conceed defeat ad suported him and call her action then democratic.

Posted by: iloghalu | May 21, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

we don’t need no obama liars!
‘change you can believe in’??
not counting ALL VOTES – is tha ‘your’ change??
ALL VOTES ALL DELGATES in MI and FL!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Tony and O,
I am a Michigan voter and what people fail to realize is the it was NEW HAMPSHIRE that VIOTATED the new sequence in which they would hold 3RD nominating contest in the 2008 presidential primaries and the DNC officals did NOTHING about it. That is why Michigan and Florida went ahead as planned to move our primaries forward. Our contest was VALIDATED by our Sec. of States and IS valid, by constitutional law. Search 2004 DNC nominating committee. Also Clinton said, (no matter what her campagin managers said) she WAS NOT removing her name from the ballot here or in Florida.
It was Mr.Obama’s, Mr Edwards and Mr. Richardson’s CHOICE to remove their names, there was no violation for keeping your name on the ballot. ALSO she was not the only one on the ballot so was Mr. Dodd, Mr. Gravel and Mr. Kucinich and uncommitted….so Mr. Dodd, Mr. Gravel and Mr. Kucinich are all rule breakers also??? Also JUST because someone voted uncommitted DID NOT mean a vote for Obama, it also could have meant a vote for Edwards or Richardson. And by the way Uncommitted lost 40% to 55% Clinton.

Posted by: dhuntguru | May 21, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

I see some uneducated people and some emotional women freaking out and threatening to vote for McCain, go ahead stupid and send your kids to war, the warmonger hero deserve to screw you.
when one vote against his best interest just to spite the other guy, there can not be a more moronic stupid argument.
So to all women who are holding a grudge, your loser fake would not go far, she can not raise a penny, owes over 30 millions and hardly spent anything on her campaign except on food to fatten her behind.

Posted by: David | May 21, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

ALL VOTES ALL DELGATES in MI and FL!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 21, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Hillary is nothing without Obama’s supporters! Gallup Poll Daily tracking has documented a surge in Democratic voters’ support for Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton in recent days, swelling from a four percentage-point lead for Obama during the first part of May to a record 16-point lead for him in polling from May 16-18. At the same time, support for Clinton among some of her traditionally stalwart support groups — women, Easterners, whites, adults with no college education, and Hispanics — has fallen below 50%. You die-hards can shout all you want. The move is on for Senator Obama.

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

You know folks, this woman is incredible. I was on the fence, but she has demonstrated the kind of tenancity we need to take on the tough issues. I say, GAME ON. Let’s have a good old fashioned Convention. You go girl and may the strongest person win!

Posted by: Roger | May 21, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Patty, the reason the dems lost to Bush is because of Karl Rove and the christian conservatives. McCain doesn’t have them this time. Obama is not evil lol

Posted by: erin | May 21, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

She is a fighter, she is not a quitter!!!What is she fighting for? Dem Nomination? How? With all sort of fuzzy math that suits her? Does she really believe that America and superdelegates are so naive? Or is she is fighting to for 2012, 2016, 2020 now? I would like to understand how decisions are made in her mind? How does she bases here decisons? Does is care for democratic values? She now says she will drag this race to convention? Does she understand the consequence of that drag…this is what repulicans want to see. Who is arrogant? Obama or Hillary? Who wants to show beat down on other candidates..in fact the rest of the party..who wants to take the party hostage…I am an indepedent. Though I like McCain, I desperately want to support democrat. Please give me a chance. Hillary…please for the sake of the people of America, who have been disillusioned with this ineffective administration, for the sake of democratic party..please take the high road and withdraw from this race. I think this election is very unique and it will define America for 21st century. This election is not about personal egos; look beyond that..Clinton Supporters..Please understand this.

Posted by: SKN | May 21, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Can we advise her to see a psychiatrist?

Posted by: mampang | May 21, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Here we go again. Clinton pretending to be disenfranchised somehow…but wait…wasn’t she the one who ordered those primaries to “hurry up and go ahead of schedule” because Obama wasnt’ even on the ticket, therefore ensuring some landslide victory for her? Those states were disqualified for BREAKING THE RULES OF THE DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION, and now somehow she’s calling foul play? So…essentially she’s calling it on…HERSELF? I’m confused…

Posted by: V for vendetta | May 21, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Whitey—-So your “source” for posting that garbage is another blog full of hateful people? Either come up with a REAL source or spare us the lies. mspasadena—-How can anyone “hate” people they don’t even know? There is serious help out there…seek it out. These kind of posts make me glad we don’t go by popular vote in this country. There are too many people who don’t have a clue and are not intelligent enough to make a decision about something this important.

Posted by: Olivia | May 21, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

erin
I have lived all my life in Chicago.
Obama is beyond evil.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Easy to say Senator Obama is “evil” with no facts to back it up. More rhetoric from the Hillary spinners!

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

erin
Really, I am pretty sure that if you watch closely you will see his head turn 360 degees.
I am not kidding.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

mspasadena………….
You are hateful, make unintelligent arguments and reflect poorly on Obama.
Shame on you for condeming Hillary to hell……..how offensive you are.
If you are the bullies that controlled the Caucus states that gave Obama the delegate lead, then we are all damned.

Posted by: Roger | May 21, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Because V for Vendetta missed it:
I am a Michigan voter and what people fail to realize is the it was NEW HAMPSHIRE that VIOTATED the new sequence in which they would hold 3RD nominating contest in the 2008 presidential primaries and the DNC officals did NOTHING about it. That is why Michigan and Florida went ahead as planned to move our primaries forward. Our contest was VALIDATED by our Sec. of States and IS valid, by constitutional law. Search 2004 DNC nominating committee. Also Clinton said, (no matter what her campagin managers said) she WAS NOT removing her name from the ballot here or in Florida.
It was Mr.Obama’s, Mr Edwards and Mr. Richardson’s CHOICE to remove their names, there was no violation for keeping your name on the ballot. ALSO she was not the only one on the ballot so was Mr. Dodd, Mr. Gravel and Mr. Kucinich and uncommitted….so Mr. Dodd, Mr. Gravel and Mr. Kucinich are all rule breakers also??? Also JUST because someone voted uncommitted DID NOT mean a vote for Obama, it also could have meant a vote for Edwards or Richardson. And by the way Uncommitted lost 40% to 55% Clinton

Posted by: dhuntguru | May 21, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

A very popular device used during the Jim Crow era was for political parties in the south to make rules for voting that denied blacks the right to vote in primaries. The Supreme Court on several occasions stated that since the winner of the primary was often the de facto winner of the general election, political parties could not make arbitrary rules that denied people the right to vote in primary election.

Posted by: JohnnyD | May 21, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Patty – Sorry, the suburbs don’t count as part of Chicago. ie 708 does not equal 312. Sorry, caught you!

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

This is America. If you have a problem with anyone other than a white male Christian President, then you need to leave. His father is a Muslim. And the problem is? I know – you want him to denounce and reject him, right? Fool!

Posted by: bcb | May 21, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

This is all so sad because Hillary is slowly destroying the Democratic Party.
Her supporters should hang their heads low, as the young & un-party affiliated question the values of Hillary & her party. She is Rush Limbaughs dream come true.

Posted by: stbdtac | May 21, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Ok Patty, tell me why he is evil.

Posted by: erin | May 21, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Facts are simple. They are undisputable. Hillary cannot win by any math or logic. She is NOT the people’s choice. She never has been. So what does she do when she can’t win honorably? She runs smear campaigns till all our eyes are ears just explode with the garbage she spews out, which by the way has always been the favorite tactic of republicans. And why does she seem so cozy with all of them lately? Could it be that she is a shameless person with no morale character at all? BINGO. She is a total creep, and needs to get out of the race for the sake of America.

Posted by: V for vendetta | May 21, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Does anyone really care if the votes in FL count? I mean, this is the state of the hanging chad. It’s obvious the people in the state don’t realize how serious this is. We’re not voting for Hooters Girl of the Year!

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

It’s not Obama who is destroying the party, it’s Hillary and her supporters. But they love to blame Obama for it. Most Obama supporters would vote for Hillary.

Posted by: zz | May 21, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Go HOME OBAMA!!!
GO BACK TO SERVING IN THE SENATE YOU ONLY HAVE 1 YEAR EXPERIENCE BEING A JUNIOR SENATOR!
Go HOME OBAMA!!!
Go HOME OBAMA!!!
Go HOME OBAMA!!!
Go HOME OBAMA!!!
Go HOME OBAMA!!!
Go HOME OBAMA!!!
Go HOME OBAMA!!!

Posted by: dhuntguru | May 21, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

My problem with Hillary is the simple fact that she is so power hungry and it appears, a little narcistic as well. If she was ahead, I’m positive that Fla and Mich. would not be an issue at all. I don’t buy what she says about “fairness to the voters”. Fair is fair, your word is your word. I guess living with Bill all those years makes one loose track of honesty.

Posted by: Olivia | May 21, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

jmengate
773 is Chicago I believe. If it is not I sure wish they would quit making me pay Chicago taxes, and all these royalties I have to pay to Daly , Stroger, and their minions.
I am also so proud that as of yesterday Chicago now has the highest price for gasoline per gallon in the nation.
Of course! Chicago is always #1 in graft and corrupt politicians. That is how we got Obama.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

this is what im talking about with hillary, she hurts herself… she is going to stay in this thing and demand she is the winner any way that she can.
IM HERE TO HELP YOU HILL JUST BECAUSE I HATE TO SEE A WOMEN LOOK SO DESPERATE, THE ONLY THING YOUR GOING TO DO IS MAKE MORE PEOPLE VOW TO NEVER VOTE FOR YOU IF YOU RUN AGAIN… STOP FINISH THE RACE BOW OUT WITH GRACE IF YOU DONT KNOW WHAT THAT IS GOOGLE IT!

Posted by: melissa | May 21, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

dhuntguru – Heh?

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Hey Hillary – - Need some more money?? I’d help you raise more money but for some reason you don’t even remember me? But what the heck – what’s a few million between friends. Hi to Bill XOXO

Posted by: Peter Paul | May 21, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

mspasadena…………….
GET A LIFE you moronic hateful person…………….

Posted by: Roger | May 21, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Dear dirtball, dishwater democrats
Please tell us again how you will vote for McCain if your girl does not get the nomination. Just one more time, pretty, pretty please.
Obama08

Posted by: snowandrain | May 21, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Let’s get to the point here. Hillary claims that the primary vote in Florida was a vote by the people and that it should be counted because it is an accurate view of Democrats in the State of Florida. Well, if you live in Florida, as I do, and paid attention to the news, as I did, you knew before you voted that the primary vote would not be counted. That’s exactly why neither her nor Barack campaigned here, and it’s precisely why I, and others, simply did not bother to vote…because we knew it wouldn’t count anyway!! Anyone who believes that vote spoke for all Democrats is sadly mistaken. Hillary is simply trying to bully her way into the White House. You can bet if she was leading in the delegate count, she wouldn’t give a hoot about Florida.
Of course, we have the Republican-lead Florida State Congress to thank for this mess. They managed to push through legislation that would move up Florida’s primary, knowing full well what would happen. They’re magnificently corrupt. Very little has changed since the fiasco in 2000.

Posted by: Steve | May 21, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Patty – Nice try. I said 708, not 773. Don’t take this the wrong way. But you sound like you need to lighten up and have some fun once in awhile. But I understand how those lame suburbs can get you down. Soooo caught you!!!!! You’d be more fun if you were actually from Chicago.

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

You people have gone too far now. This blog has officially turned to garbage.
GoodNight folks!!

Posted by: AutoCadSkills | May 21, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Steve – Thank you for setting the record straight. Why don’t more people from FL see it that way?

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

V for Vendetta:
Maybe Hillary has more moxey than all those other politicians. If you want change sometimes you have to be the rock thrown into the pond to cause the ripple effect and make change. Yes, I was POed at my senators and that is EXACTLY where I recieved my information… Senator Levin and Senator Stabanow themselves.
I wrote them and this was the info I recieved in a letter from both, so it does make me pretty mad when others whom know NOTHING and are not from my state or Florida talk like they know.. when they dont.

Posted by: dhuntguru | May 21, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

pattydaggs – Easy there Rush. Don’t worry, you’re not a bad person. I’m sure there’s at least one good Republican out there!

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

On Aug. 25, when the DNC’s rules panel declared Florida’s primary date out of order, it agreed by a near-unanimous majority to exceed the 50 percent penalty called for under party rules. Instead, the group stripped Florida of all 210 delegates to underscore its displeasure with Florida’s defiance and to discourage other states from following suit. In doing so, the DNC essentially committed itself, for fairness’ sake, to strip the similarly defiant Michigan of all 156 of its delegates three months later. Clinton held tremendous potential leverage over this decision, and not only because she was then widely judged the likely nominee. Of the committee’s 30 members, a near-majority of 12 were Clinton supporters. All of them—most notably strategist Harold Ickes—voted for Florida’s full disenfranchisement. (The only dissenting vote was cast by a Tallahassee, Fla., city commissioner who supported Obama.)

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

jmengate
708 is a suburban area code. So is 847 & 630. What is your point? 312 is for downtown Chicago only. the rest of Chicago is 773.
Sorry, but I don’t understand what your point is.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Suzan – Are you a guy?

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

OOOPPPS! Sorry – I meant “lose track of honesty”. I don’t want to be slammed for a honest mistake.

Posted by: Olivia | May 21, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

This is not about the popular votes like Hillary is talking now, if she get her way with Florida and Michigan. If that was the case than Gore would have been President and the past 8 years would have never happened. But it’s about who got the most delegates. Hillary like to spin it however she like to spin it but at the end it’s Game Over for Hillary.

Posted by: Tony | May 21, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Patty – Here’s the point. I completely busted you. You claim to be this ‘know all’ from Chicago. You are neither. You’re one of those peeps from the suburbs that I run into everyday who claim to be from here but in reality aren’t. Chicago rocks. Accept it.

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

If Hillary Clinton wants to count the
Michigan popular vote than Obama
should get all of the non-hillary votes!
Otherwise Hillary stick it where the sun
don’t shine!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 21, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Tony – Please, please, please tell me there’s a way that the last 8 years never happened!

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Pattydaggs says
Mspasadena. you are an ignorant bitch! No wonder you will vote for Obama…that’s the only kind of people who will vote for him…you are lacking a brain!! Educated people know better than to vote for this lying, scum loving idiot!
———————————-
Wow, What do you mean that’s the only kind of people that will vote for him. I am educated and an Obama supporter. You are lacking in manners my dear.

Posted by: Emily | May 21, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

It makes sense that the people who are for Obama are the type to simply type his name over and over and then say something snide about Hillary. definite blank slates.

Posted by: Ben | May 21, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Hillary spoke on this issue and even agreed to disenfranchise both states..may be she misspoke…

Posted by: Emmanuel | May 21, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

pattydogs – Again, are you a man?

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Looks to me like Barack should have hired better educated paid bloggers. At least he should have hired bloggers who could compose a sentence and be able to spell. Seems to me like they might have been a bit more effective that way. As it is, they are coming off pretty ignorant, and they certainly aren’t changing my mind by their vitriolic name-calling. Of course, it’s obvious some of them don’t know what that word means, anyway.

Posted by: Mary | May 21, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

jmengate
You are an idiot.
Not only do you not know area codes, which any idiot can look up, but that is obviously beyond you, but you write like an idiot. You must be an Obama supporter.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

As an John Edwards supporter, first let me say that I’m luke warm about both Clinton and Obama. I find it odd, however, that the media has failed to point out that while Hillary and her supporters are constantly characterizing Obama as a phony, it is unimaginable that the Clinton campaign would be so indignant about every vote being counted in Michigan and Florida if the math were going to move her farther away from the nomination rather than closer to it. Feigning concern for a principle merely out of self interest is the utmost in phoniness and hyprocisy.

Posted by: sps91158 | May 21, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

pattydaggs – anything intelligent to say or is hate all you are capable of spewing. And I have to agree with some other folks – I do not believe you are from Chicao any more than I am.

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Here is the problem facing the Democratic Party. If it ignores the votes from Florida and Michigan, it is disenfranchising millions of voters whyo did not choose to hold the primary election early. It was the legislatures that made the decision. If the Democratic Party includes Florida and Michigan, it will need to change the rules. So I ask you, what is worse? I think that changing the rules is a better solution than disenfranchising millions of voters.

Posted by: DonLB | May 21, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Patty I am a New Yorker who loved the Clinton name. I am now quite disappointed with Senator Clintons behavior. Remember that Obama is no more a liter than Hillary. She was under sniper fire in Bosnia and her integrity is questionable. She agreed that the Michigan & Fl delegates not be counted when they violated party rules but now that she is loosing, she wants them counted. If the shoe was on the other foot you would have lots more nasty name for Obama.

Posted by: woman46 | May 21, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Pattydaggs,
you are the one that is not classy calling people ignorant just because they support Obama. What class does Hillary have, look into whitewater and Peter Paul and everything else. She has so much baggage. And she doesn’t give a damn about the working class. She is just using them to get her elected. I’m sorry you don’t see that.

Posted by: Emily | May 21, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Patty – OMG so LMAO!!!! Got under your skin, did I. Well, here’s the difference. I don’t actually think you’re an idiot. We just have a difference of opinion. Just don’t say you’re from Chicago if you’re from some lame suburb.

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

And about that popular vote claim from Hillary – a popular vote doesn’t get you $31 million in debt. There’s nothing popular about that.

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Bill and Hillary Clinton are the lowest forms of degenerates I’ve ever seen in national politics. They need to crawl back to the sludge from where they came.
HILLARY HAD TO HAVE HER HUSBAND MAKE HER CAREER FOR HER! She’s not this great woman figure. She’s a low life with no morals, no values, and certainly no integrity. We don’t have to point out her dishonesty do we?

Posted by: Jasmine | May 21, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

The Democratic nominee has not been chosen yet for the simple reason that the people failed to make a choice between Hillary and Barack. Because the people left the choice to the superdelegates, I can see no reason why Florida and Michigan cannot be involved in the process or why Hillary should be denied the popular vote. The more minds involved in deciding who can win in November the better.

Posted by: Maya Ayazi | May 21, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Released: May 21, 2008
Obama Builds Lead Over Clinton in National Contest
As he moves ever closer to wrapping up the Democratic Party presidential nomination, Obama is also opening up a big lead over Clinton among Democrats nationwide. In a national preference test, he leads her by a 59% to 33% margin, the latest Reuters poll shows.
Senator Obama completely dominates among those voters under age 35, winning more than 80% support, but also leads among all voters under age 70, where she held a solid advantage. Obama also now leads among almost all likely Democratic voters according to political philosophy – moderates, mainline liberals, and progressives. Clinton leads only among conservative Democrats. Obama also leads Clinton among both Catholics and Protestants, and among those who claim no religious affiliation.

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

I am so disappointed with these comments from Hillary Clinton. She knew the rules of the race when she began the race. She is out there trying to change these rules and get people to believe that rules can be changed because she is not winning the race. She knew that Florida & Michigan were penalized with the timing of their races before the process began. She then complained that caucus states were not fair to her. Because the math is not adding up in her favor, she is out there spewing spin, just like the TV political commentators do. This is not a Democratic process. To those Hillary posters who say they will not vote for Obama in November, just remember the state of the economy right now, the price of gasoline and food, the never ending war in Iraq, and the state of a woman’s right to choose on the Supreme Court. Out of bitterness, some folks would rather vote for a 3rd term for McBush rather than a person who can inspire our youth and protect and defend America and our interests? I hope Hillary can live with herself if this scenario plays out. I am done with the Clintons.

Posted by: truth&honesty | May 21, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

jmengate
Wow! You are just like Obama.
You think if you repeat a lie enough people will believe you.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

jmengate
Wow! You are just like Obama.
You think if you repeat a lie enough people will believe you.

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

sandy – Your 11:27 post is right on. Both camps had an agreement.
If I represented a foreign country and Hillary was President, I would have to wonder, “is that treaty we signed valid or will Clinton nullify it if she later decides it’s not in her best interest?” “Does her word mean anything?”
This election is not, and has never been, about Hillary Clinton and her sick ego. She is making us look like a bunch of fools to the rest of the world. How can anyone trust us if they can’t trust that she is honest. My God, the woman is so power hungry that she is an embarrasment. This is not about “guts”, and “hanging in there” – this is about one woman’s sick ego and quest for power. I don’t see why that is not clear to all.

Posted by: Olivia | May 21, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Obama leads McCain 47% to 37% … while Clinton statistically ties McCain.
2008 General Election Match-ups
John McCain 37%
Barack Obama 47%
Ralph Nader 4%
Bob Barr 3%
Not sure/Other 10%
John McCain 40%
Hillary Clinton 41%
Ralph Nader 4%
Bob Barr 3%
Not sure/Other 12%

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

noobama, did you actually read that book. I did and it was wonderful. Sorry, excerpts don’t work for me. Oh and how many times did Hillary run from the snipers in Bosnia.

Posted by: Emily | May 21, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Patty – Ok, I give up. Yes, I’ll go on a date with you. Just let me know when and where. You realize most guys are idiots anyways, right?

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Hillary is going to Destroy American! Her persistence will cause either J McCain to win in 08 or Riots across America if Obama is not given his earned right to the nomination. She is a racist by playing the “white workers’ card. Why the Pundits continue to pamper her I do not know. Why the Leaders of the Democratic party have not pulled her aside, I do not know. SHe will destroy the Democratic party all by herself and any chance of another woman to be President in this nation.THe party will not allow it.

Posted by: spoon2456 | May 21, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Hillary and Rove and Bush OH MY. She wants to actually use a state’s votes where her opponents weren’t even on the ballot. Oh my god how far in the gutter will this woman crawl. Then to play the gender card in the process further demonstrates her lack of principles and fairness. Very similar to the tactics Bush used in the Fla recount.Oh god! Hillary is bringing the nastiest comments out of me.Man when I voted in the Wis primary I told my wife that I thought the Dems actually had 2 great candidates and it was actually difficult to decide which candidate was best. For once I wasn’t voting for the usual lesser of 2 evils but the best for the job. Hillary has changed my mind completely! She is dismantling the Democratic vote day by day and handing it to 4 more years of McBush. The goal here is to save lives in Iraq and at home for people without healthcare. She has completely lost sight of this,the ultimate objective. OBAMA 08

Posted by: Newsrook | May 21, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Clinton will NEVER be president… I’d rather have Obama lose to McCain than vote for this bitch. Call me sexist all you want, but Clinton will NEVER be president, and you old, resentful hags can go to your graves never having elected a woman president.
It’s all YOUR fault for voting solely on the basis of gender and making this into a “woman vs. man” election. I never before had qualms about female leaders until now. I respected Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir. But then in this election, I saw how these so-called feminists willingly buy into the lying, deceiful Clinton’s b.s. just because she’s a woman. It’s the most disgusting display of reverse-sexism I’ve ever seen. Hillary literally ran as a “woman candidate”… imagine if Obama had run as a black candidate! I don’t care of Obama loses to McCain. I’m just giddy that Hillary will lose… go down in shame… and will never, ever be president much to the chagrin of her sick supporters.

Posted by: mike | May 21, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Hillary has gone off the deep end. She is comparing the Florida and Michigan vote not being counted like
Woman’s Suffrage
Civil Rights
Florida 2000
Zimbabwe election
One of the talk show heads thought she was Amy poeler doing a SNL skit.

Posted by: juneau52 | May 21, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Well said…for a man….

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

jmengate
well ok, but what are code are we meeting in?

Posted by: Patty | May 21, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Patty – Just to show you how flexible I am I’ll let you pick the area code.

Posted by: jmengate | May 21, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

stanium: Does the popular vote in Florida count for anything, we asked Sen. Barack Obama on the ride from Tampa to Orlando: “Look, I think it’s fair to say that in all these races if I didn’t campaign at all and this had just been a referendum on name recognition, Sen. Clinton would be the nominee. That’s true in Iowa, that’s true in practically every state we’ve won. It’s pretty hard to make an argument that somehow you winning what is essentially a name recognition contest in Florida was a good measure of electoral strength there. It’s even tougher to make that argument in Michigan where my name wasn’t even on the ballot.
Obama also said splitting Florida’s delegation in half based on the Jan. 29 result – which was the GOP penalty what many see as the most likely outcome of the DNC rules committee on 5/31 – would be “a very reasonable solution.”
He made no apologies for signing a pledge to boycott Florida: “Everybody signed that. It was voluntary in name only. Had we not agreed to that we would be in a position where on the one hand the DNC was telling you this won’t count, on the other hand you’ve gone out of your way to offend the first two states where you know that it will count. I would hardly call that voluntary.”
http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2008/05/obama-popular-v….

Posted by: sandy | May 21, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

You people out there who support Hillary are either stupid or very racist. It is so obvious that Hillary does not care about the democratic party, she does not care about America, she cares ONLY about her own ambitions. For her to say she wants the people heard and the votes in MI and FL to count yet knows very well Obama was not even on the MI ballot is so sleazy and crooked. I have never seen a politician who could care less about the country and its people than her

Posted by: paul | May 21, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Pattydaggs all your posts are calling people idiots and ignorant and bitches. Why are you blaming Obama supporters for doing that when that is exactly what you’re doing.

Posted by: Emily | May 21, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

IF Obama is the nominee, kiss Florida goodbye. There is no way he will win that state! too many Jews, Latinos, and Elderly for him to win…which means he has to take Ohio and Penn. – that aint going to happen…
Hillary can carry all three – And Michigan!

Posted by: East Side Love | May 22, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

I hope Hillary prevails. I have had second thoughts about Obama because, evne though I like him, I don’t think he can win against McCain in the Fall. It will be a replay of John Kerry if he is nominated. He will lose to McCain because we have a lot of stupid white blue collar voters that won’t vote for a black candidate with the Jeremiah Wright and other controversies hanging over him. And whether the Democrat Committee boycotted the Florida and Michigan primaries or not, the vote that took place SHOULD be counted. People took the trouble to come out and it should be counted. It isn’t changing in mid stream to have the one person, one vote principle still hold. Let the Democrat Party ruling committee change and compromise in the interest of a fair nominating process. Otherwise there will be lingering questions of who would have won if the Florida and Michigan primary votes had counted. If Obama is the clear winner after all is said and done, then fine, let him be the nominee and I’ll be 200 percent behind him. I am leaning toward Hillary only after careful deliberation about who is the better candidate for the Fall and who wins based on fair applicatoin of popular vote rules, but if Obama gets the nomination fair and square, then I’ll be behind his candidacy with all I’ve got.

Posted by: JL | May 22, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

micha6888 – Now don’t be judgemental. I’m not mean! I’m just trying to hit on Patty.

Posted by: jmengate | May 22, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

To Mr. Pukes,
Since the ABC censors allowed you to comment, I will reply to you:
Meet me in Florida where I will PUKE all of over you

Posted by: East Side Love | May 22, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

staniam ah, but you are saying Hillary can? She also agreed to the rules – the votes do not count – now she wants to change the rules? Nor does Hillary want any MI votes to go to Senator Obama in any kind of split – she wants them all. Hillary turned down the split offer – honed to her own advantage – not Senator Obama.

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Obama supporters are the most venomous…look at all their dark, hateful comments… whatever happened to “Got Hope?”
All you guys are hypocrites!

Posted by: East Side Love | May 22, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

staniam -”and their life long dream wont come true!” Trust me, I gave up dreams of marrying Farah Facet years ago.

Posted by: jmengate | May 22, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

staniam- Obama is not my Messiah thank you, Jesus is. But fair is fair. Hillary gave her word — and, that should be the end of it. Do you believe this whole thing plays well in other countries? Hillary will lose because her campaign was lacking money and she thought she had it wrapped up in a neat little bow after California. She asked why Obama can’t “wind it up” – my question is why can’t she? She has been running for 8 years already and had all that time to put together a winning campaign. I believe her ego is such that she didn’t think she could lose. I don’t think that is an asset in a leader. Forming a winning campaign from grass roots support is the sign of a leader. That is what Obama has done.

Posted by: Olivia | May 22, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

After looking at this blog I don’t thik Democrats will ever win in November unless they run together!
Obama/Hillary
or
Hillary/Obama

Posted by: Pam | May 22, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Mich6888, we are not angry, just tired of the Clintons and there ways. They hate america, they hate blacks and are obviously trying to ruin Obama’s chances for the general election so she can get a shot in 2012. She obviously could care less what happens in the country until then. She is pure evil and is a borderline facist.

Posted by: paul | May 22, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

East Side Love – Very deep…..

Posted by: jmengate | May 22, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

In answer to a Muslim question posted above. I was born to a Roman Catholic mother and a Jewish heritage father. The RC Church claimed me from birth! I made my own choice as an adult. Obama has been ‘claimed’ by Muslims under the same thinking with man-made religious rules because of his Muslim-in-name- only father who was a drunk, a womanizer, and broke just about every other Muslim law. Obama’s family understandably shielded him as a child about the reality of his father and hence the false image he created of him. Obama is a Christian. His mother was an atheist who sent Obama to her parents far away from Muslim influence. Why didn’t the voters of Florida and Michigan do all of their howling at the onset of this mess? And, just who is doing most of the howling? Obama initially objected because HRC wanted to allow only a revote by voters who voted the first time. Duh? Many of you state you stayed at home so you could not have voted anyway in a revote according to HRC rules! How very democratic of her. We in other States would have supported a change of those decisions after a previous Florida fiasco but I did not hear any outrage that I could not possibly have missed. But, I do not support primaries that do not involve early States with diverse demographics to skew the results. Big Tuesday was to be a prime example but something happened between announcing candidacy and February 2008. Perhaps, some of us being real Americans dislike the idea of inevitability and/or dynasties but still prefer to have choices? Just a thought. Been around since JFK elections and the rumor mongering that the Vatican would take over America! I really did not want brother Robert assuming the Presidency as a Kennedy birthright. Did not vote for either Bush. This is America not India or Pakistan et al with their political dynasties. Sandy: Thank you for a very clear explanation about the disenfranchisement. Hillary and her supporters could have blocked it? Only one Obama supporter tried to? Interesting. Nobody listened to him. Now if we could unload Bill Clinton’s legacy of the Texas Two-Step system! Caucus votes here could be counted, one-by-one, since we each had to sign a sheet and not just raise our hands, and write out our choice in full name.

Posted by: KiwiTricia | May 22, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

I loved your post Jeremy! Best one so far:
“Florida screwed up an election – again. Big surprise. Florida needs to pay the price for f**cking up 2 presidential elections and now messing up a primary. When they can get it right and follows the rules, they can play ball. Otherwise, let them go back to their swimming pools.”

Posted by: sheila | May 22, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Hillary dont really care about Florida or Michigan, if Obama needed those two states to catch up with her then she would be crying heck no they broke the rules, she trying to play both sides of the fence and it won’t help her one bit.The same old politics nothing new!!!

Posted by: jg5012 | May 22, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

staniam – Ok, tell me what you would do. You’re running in a state that has a caucus. Would you run or take your ‘high ground’. Think about it, you really don’t have a point.

Posted by: jmengate | May 22, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

My final comments for the night.
Florida legislature voted to move the date up. 2 senators voted against it and no representative voted against it. So don’t blame the republicans.
The national constitution and no state constitution has a provision to governs how political party. There are about 20 political parties and only two have primaries and caucuses. And the national party has total control over how they select candidates. The two national parties give some options to the states to decide.
Why do 45% of the voters in Michigan get their votes thrown away. 55% voted for Clinton and 45% voted again Clinton. Why don’t the negative votes against Clinton not affect the outcome?
Finally, many of you are threatening the Obama side that he is disenfranchising 17 million Clinton supports. That works both ways. If Clinton gets the rules changed so she wins, what do you think is going to happend to the 17 million that supports him. I think it is time for both sides to calm down and relax. Neither candidate is as bad as all this stupid mudslinging on this blog. Stop whining like a bunch of litte kids blaming everyone else for your problems. The founding fathers are rolling in their graves. I just hope foreigners are not reading this and thinking that this represents real American. If this is America’s best, it is no wonder we have the incompetent Congress and President we have ever had.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | May 22, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

micha6888 – You’re not feeling the love….sounds kind of like a Republican reaction to me. Caught you mate!

Posted by: jmengate | May 22, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

KiwiTricia – no problem – happy I could help clear things up. :) The problem coms when Hillary supporters ignore the facts or put Hillary’s spin on them.

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Florida Voters, you have been DISENFRANCHISED AGAIN. Worse yet, it’s YOUR OWN PARTY who does it this time.

Posted by: ablanche08 | May 22, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Clinton is pandering. When she thought she was the presumptive nominee, her position was very different.
posted previously by another:
Actually, Senator Clinton, the Democratic Party did decide what to do. They decided to strip those states of all their delegates. This decision was made through the proper procedures, at the proper time, by the proper decision-makers — including your own adviser Harold Ickes, who voted “yes” on the delegate-stripping plan. The decision was clear and straightforward: if Florida and Michigan didn’t move their primary dates, they’d lose their delegations. Period. That was, and is, the decision.
You initially accepted this decision because it was politically necessary for you to do so — after all, you couldn’t be seen as the only candidate not currying favor with Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina. Now, you are refusing to accept that very same decision because it is, again, politically necessary for you to do so, as you can’t “win” without those “delegates” who were “elected” in those states’ illegitimate “primaries.”

Posted by: So | May 22, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Olivia – You are right on point

Posted by: woman46 | May 22, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

staniam – Never said I wasn’t pathetic. At least I’m taking this election a little more seriously than some of you cry babies though. I mean, I respect your enthusiasm for your candidate, but this attitude of ‘screw the country I my candidate doesn’t win’ is just crap!

Posted by: jmengate | May 22, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

staniam – if Hillary were the VP, President Obama would not need a babysitter – he would need a food tester!

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

CLINTON AND CAPITULATION
It is NOT OVER until someone crosses the threshold in required delegates. Until then, the process should be allowed to proceed.
http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/05/clinton-and-capitulation.html
It would be undemocratic to do otherwise.

Posted by: PacificGatePost | May 22, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Hillary needs to win this election so that more Clinton crooks can get a parole and then she can get paid back all that money she loaned herself.

Posted by: jg5012 | May 22, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

staniam – Got to call it a night. Say ‘Hi’ to your buddy Rush when you decide to logoff. BUSTED you mate. Sorry, you’re too tranparent.

Posted by: jmengate | May 22, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Rusty, TX – support please for your allegations?

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

ALL VOTES ALL DELGATES in MI and FL!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 22, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Rusty – You use yourself to judge others. I am sure glad that I don’t know you. NASTY NASTY NASTY

Posted by: woman46 | May 22, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

staniam – and the caucus system was set up by Bill Clinton and Hillary’s former finance manager because they thought it would benefit Hillary this year. So knock the caucus system all you want – it lays at the Clinton’s feet!

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Can anyone imagine Hillary Clinton sitting down with foreign leaders and compromising or negotiating. She’d be “flexing her muscles” as she is doing now. Remember she has promised to “obliterate Iran” causing an international incident. Iran sent a complaint to the United Nations in reference to Hillary’s stupid remarks. First, if her intent is to obliterate them, why would she give them the “heads up” putting all of our lives in danger. Just suppose Iran took her threat seriously and nuked us first.
She is desparate and dangerous!!!

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Can anyone imagine Hillary Clinton sitting down with foreign leaders and compromising or negotiating. She’d be “flexing her muscles” as she is doing now. Remember she has promised to “obliterate Iran” causing an international incident. Iran sent a complaint to the United Nations in reference to Hillary’s stupid remarks. First, if her intent is to obliterate them, why would she give them the “heads up” putting all of our lives in danger. Just suppose Iran took her threat seriously and nuked us first.
She is desparate and dangerous!!!

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Here goes ABC with it’s professional wrestling political news. Controversy- controversy, they got to keep up with FOX, to pull in those talk-radio viewers.
How come it is not OK to ask Clinton a direct question like- Don’t you see a contradiction here with you being the only one on the ballot in Michigan?- 6 out of 7 canidates played by the rules, now you want to be rewarded by being the only one that did’nt? You said the MIchigan primary will count for nothing, and now you are claiming to be a democratic savior? Its like HIllary’s bar is set at 1 foot and BarraCKS IS set at 20 feet. I mean come on.

Posted by: evan thyme | May 22, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Hillary (and Bill) Clinton have done more to help poor and working people than Obama has done in his latte-drinking life,including his post-graduate “field-trp” into the ghetto when he took up with Rezco,his slumlord friend.
Children’s Health Insurance, Family and Medical Leave Act continues to help MANY working Americans, although it probably goes unnoticed by his bourgeoisie supporters who don’t need it.
The hateful Obama supporters continue to try to re-write history, or are unaware that Gingrich Republicans ‘stopped the government’ and stopped paychecks for working families in the dead of winter until Clinton signed the welfare reform bill. Then they actually hated him for reducing the penalites and putting in job training programs to help with the transition.
Obama has relied on reverse racism,sexism and ignorance to get as far as he has in this race.He has benefitted from gaming the electoral system to let Republicans and caucus bullies determine the outcome of the Democratic Primaries.
Now his supporters want to be babies about Hillary finishing the primary campaign and exercising HER options for review.
If the tables were turned and Hillary supporters told Obama to drop out, what would they say?–Oh, I know…they would accuse everyone of being RACIST.

Posted by: 12SpeakOut | May 22, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

staniam – and there are just as many allegations that Hillary supporters did the same thing – so live with it. There is blame on both sides – Hillary supporters were no saints at the caucuses, either!

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

How come the neo-communist I knew in Bulgaria are just like the neo-conservatives here in the states. They dress the same, talk the same, act the same, it is uncanny the similarities. Even there world views are the same. It is so ironic.

Posted by: evan | May 22, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Neil 1785
I was taught that the more one writes, the less chance of anyone reading it.
Write less, then maybe we will read your posts.
Obama 08

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Well put neil !!!!!

Posted by: jg5012 | May 22, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

remember the talking heads in 2000 telling everyone that it was ok not to count the votes in FL?
same talking heads are at it again – these people brought gw bush upon america..through fraud and manipulations!
the same talkin g heads are trying to inflict obama on us.. watch out!
ALL VOTES ALL DELGATES in MI and FL!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 22, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I’m with Hillary.

Posted by: Suzannaquanashawn | May 22, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

obama is the LIAR! preaching change to people but fighting against counting the votes..
ALL VOTES ALL DELGATES in MI and FL!
obama and the sexist talking heads on tv know that if ALL votes are counted obama loses!
that is why they are opposing counting the votes.
put them all in a bag and send them all to zimbabwe!
this is the USA!!
WE COUNT THE VOTES IN THE USA!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 22, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

staniam – and you do? The reports of abuses were all over the Net blogs and on MSM – on BOTH sides – so don’t try and brush off abuses by Hillary supporters.

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Hillary dont really care about Florida or Michigan, if Obama needed those two states to catch up with her then she would be crying heck no they broke the rules, she trying to play both sides of the fence and it won’t help her one bit.The same old politics nothing new!!!

Posted by: jg5012 | May 22, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Obama has only won ONE (1) Primary!!! If they didnt have the cheating-promoting caususes they have– Hillary clearly would have won the nomination MONTHS AGO!!!!!!!!!
THIS DEMOCRAT WILL NEVER SUPPORT BARACK OBAMA!!
N
E
V
E
R
….SAYING A BIG HELL NO TO B.O!

Posted by: One of Millions | May 22, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

I am so disappointed to see how the Obama supporters are acting. Do you actually think this is helping.
This is a blog where thoughts should be expressed not hate and repeats.

Posted by: womanwhocares | May 22, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

12SpeakOut – just like Hillary claims she is a victim of sexism. Oh, the spin, don’t you just love it! Even the media jumped on her today as well as the analysts – dear old Hilllary loves to play the spin game when when she can spin it in her favor and you people fall for it every time!

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

womanwhocares – spurred on by the Hillary supporters….blame falls on BOTH sides – Hillary supporters are no saints either!

Posted by: sandy | May 22, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Newsweek article
Give credit where it’s due: Hillary Clinton has shown grit and determination in finishing out the race. She has proved herself a strong campaigner. And in the week since West Virginia, she has stopped the cheap shots that had marred her campaign this year.
But Clinton has continued with one claim that could have a pernicious effect on the Democrats’ chances in November. While she knows that the nomination is determined by delegates, Hillary insists on saying at every opportunity that she is winning the popular vote. And she has now taken to touting the new HBO movie “Recount,” which chronicles the Florida fiasco of eight years ago. Everyone can agree that the primary calendar needs reform. But popular-vote pandering is poison for Democrats. For a party scarred by the experience of 2000, when Al Gore received 500,000 more popular votes than George W. Bush but lost the presidency, this argument is sure to make it harder to unite and put bitter feelings aside.
Oh, and it’s not true.
Let me go through the numbers without making your head spin.
After Kentucky and Oregon, Obama has an official popular vote lead of 449,486.
This does not include Iowa (where Obama first broke from the pack), Nevada (where Hillary won the popular vote narrowly), Maine (where Obama won easily) or Washington state (another strong Obama state). Why? Because these caucus states don’t officially report their popular votes. But if we’re going to truly count all the votes, official and nonofficial, as Hillary advocates, you can’t very well not include caucus states.
Adding in the unofficial tally from caucus states, as estimated by realclearpolitics.com based on official caucus turnout and the number of local delegates selected at the precinct level, that gives Obama a lead of 559,708.
Now we come to Florida and Michigan, whose popular votes Hillary says should be counted. The argument for counting them is no better than for counting the caucus states (and maybe worse, considering that these states violated party rules by moving their primaries up on the calendar, and no one campaigned there). But for the sake of argument let’s count ‘em. That gives Hillary a lead of 63,373.
HILLARY WINS POPULAR VOTE!
Not so fast. If the Democratic National Committee completes its expected settlement on May 31, Florida and Michigan will each get half of their votes counted. Translated to popular votes, that would subtract about 325,000 votes from Hillary, putting Obama back into the lead.
Beyond not being official numbers, there’s another problem with counting Michigan in these totals. Obama wasn’t on the ballot there. You can say this was his own choice, but that doesn’t change the fact that had he been on the Michigan ballot he would have received a lot of popular votes. How many?
Try 238,168. That’s the number of Michiganders who voted for “uncommitted.” Were they possibly genuinely abstaining? Maybe a few hundred of them at most. The rest were clearly Obama supporters who launched a grass-roots campaign. Everyone in Michigan knew on January 15 that a vote for “uncommitted” was a vote for Obama.
That means that by a generous definition of popular votes (and remember, Clinton wants to enfranchise as many people as possible in her count), Obama leads by about 166,000 votes.
With a big win in Puerto Rico, Clinton could possibly erase that margin (plus several thousand more that Obama is expected to net in Montana and South Dakota). She could then proclaim that with the help of Puerto Rican voters who cannot vote in a general election, she is the popular vote winner.
The shorthand many Clinton supporters are already taking into the summer is that she won the popular vote but had the nomination “taken away” (as Joy Behar said on “The View”) by a man.
What a helpful message for uniting the Democratic Party.
If the Obama people have any sense, they will demand in their negotiations with the Clintonites that Hillary cease and desist in her specious claim to have won the most popular votes.
Given that more than 35 million voters took part in the Democratic primaries and caucuses, the math games on both sides look awfully silly. Everyone should agree to call it a tie.

Posted by: Tony | May 22, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Hillary made a clear case today why Florida and Michigan must count. The Barack campaign has vetoed any chance for a remake because of the debastating loses they are suffering. Since the Rev Write story America is against Barck. SWe can not let a bunch of radicals fools (Moveon.org, George Soros, Huftintong Post, MSNBC) take over the democratic party with their America Hater candidate Barack. If the democratic elitist still this ellection form the people’s choice Hillary then we will make sure that when the votes are counted in Nov the Barck radicals are the loosers. We will defeat the gang of crooks headed by their anti-american Barack

Posted by: Ed | May 22, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Why do you feel all of the Super delegates are jumping ship and going to Obama?
Answer: They know the Clinton’s much better than we voters.
We had a great economy when Bill was in office, but let me explain why we had a great economy.
The economy flourishes on its own when we are not at war.
When the World Trade Center was attacked the first time, Bill Clinton did nothing.
When the SS Cole was attacked, Bill Clinton did nothing.
When the African Embassy was bombed, Bill Clinton did nothing.
When the Army Barracks was attacked, Bill Clinton did nothing.
Is he had seriously gone after Bin Laden on the first attack, there would not have been a 2nd attack, costing over 3,000 civilian lives in N.Y.
Hillary Clinton voted to Invade Iraq, costing over 4,000 soldier’s deaths and approximately 80,000 civilian Iraq deaths.
She claims she did not read the “Declaration to Invade Iraq.” Since her vote against the war would have been unpopular at the time and she wanted to become a member of the “good ole boy’s” club, she voted “yea”
Senator Byrd made a speech on the floor for over 30 minutes asking the Senators not to approve the Declaration.
Now, she claims the war was wrong and she is going to bring the men home. She drove the bus into the ditch and now she wants the voters to congratulate her because she intends to pull the bus out. How stupid. She now wants to care for the soldiers when they come home maimed and mentally impaired. She caused their injuries.
She had access to intelligence reports yet she claims she did not read them, she took Bush’s word.
Bush did not control her vote for the war, she did.
Hillary supporters are grossly uninformed and we should actually feel sorry for them.

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

she’s a selfish woman who does everything for wining. if she cares so much about voters rights why she wants the superdelegates to overturn the will of those same voters(17000000) and also hints at having the elected delegates switch sides as well?

Posted by: rima | May 22, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Florida and Michigan votes should be counted. The system is very unfair to all. It should be if a candidate gets
for example sixty percent of the popular
vote then the candidate should get 60 percent if the delegate count.Whats fair is fair. The delegates are supposed to follow the will of the people but they do not. If they followed the will of the people Hillary would be ahead.Obama would be kaput.

Posted by: Laura Graff | May 22, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Ed:
Obama does not have the legal authority to veto anything. Obama has always said, he will abide by DNC rules.

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

This poptart obviously didn’t pay attention in civics class.
“Each of us should have an equal voice in determining the destiny of our nation. A generation of patriots risked and sacrificed lives on the battlefield for that ideal.”
Ummmmm, noooooooo…… As a Republican Democracy, we elect representatives to make decisions on our behalf. By that simple definition, each of us does NOT have an equal voice. Our patriots died defending THAT ideal, not the one she’s invented to manipulate people with….. Or else why the hell are we paying their salaries?
“We believe that the outcome of our elections should be determined by the will of the people. Nothing more. Nothing less. And we believe the popular vote is the truest expression of your will. We believe it today just as we believed it back in 2000 when right here in Florida you learned the hard way what happens when your votes aren’t counted and a candidate with fewer votes is determined the winner.”
This is only a party nomination process and not an actual election, so there’s no correlation between this situation and that of the 2000 election. I think she also forgot the biggest issue: Popular vote does not make a President, the Electoral College does. Someone should let Jackson, Tilden, Cleveland and Gore know they got shafted, THEY should have been president in each of their failed bids according to “The Rules of HRC,” which obviously ignore The Constitution, which clearly lays it all out.
Simple civics. She can’t get that straight but she thinks she can lead this country? How can she lead us if she doesn’t even understand the basic premises under which we operate? On the other hand, if she DOES understand and is just using manipulation tactics, how can we conscionably vote for her?
What’s most ridiculous is her blatant glossing over the cold and simple fact that NOT ONE SINGLE VOTE CAST BY ONE SINGLE CITIZEN WILL DECIDE WHO IS PRESIDENT OR EVEN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NOMINEE, either in this asinine primary (which, AGAIN, is a nomination process, NOT AN ELECTION) or in the “real” election in November, when 538 members of the Electoral College sit down and cast their votes, and they can vote for whomever they choose regardless of the “popular vote.” If she doesn’t like those rules, she’s welcome to work to change them LEGALLY – but she can’t unilaterally change them mid-stride or declare her own version of the rules as she sees fit. Contrary to her belief, The Constitution is a bit more powerful than HRC.
Finally, as a Michigan voter, I don’t see her posturing as standing up to protect me or my rights in any way, shape, or form. She signed an agreement to disqualify us. PERIOD. End of story. If she really gave a rat’s @$$ about our votes, she would have argued the case for us back then instead of signing on the dotted line. It’s my opinion, if the DNC makes a rule and it is broken and then they go back later and change the penalty they imposed, they’re never going to play by any legitimate set of rules, they are not trustworthy as a whole, and I will NEVER vote for any Democratic candidate for any office again, regardless of their qualifications. I will do just as I did this past January: I will sit home (like millions of other Michigan voters did, after we were told our votes would not count), and let the cowpies fall where they may, because there are too many crooked politicians in Lansing and in DC who will get what they want anyhow; after all, they can change the rules any time they want.

Posted by: annielee | May 22, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Its like I said months ago you Obamabots dont want the issue of MI or FL brought he is trying to walk off the court before the buzzer, this has been shown in KY and WV every vote counts the delegates should not be seated 50/50 because thats breaking the rules. each delegate should only count as half a delegate in Fl case. In MI what is half of nothing….nothing because no votes for you means no delegates talk about changing the rules Obama trying to get something for nothing.

Posted by: Quintell | May 22, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

I am so sick of reading these comments that state they will NOT vote for Hillary or Obama if their nominee doesn’t get it!!!! GROW UP you all sound like a bunch of babies that goes for both sides… It‘s immature; maybe you shouldn’t be voting at all. I am sick of hearing about the WHITE blue collar votes. I am one of them Guess who I voted for…. and some of the votes Hillary has received with the White blue collar folks are REPUBLICANS, with thanks from Rush Limbo.
In the G.E. she will NOT get them…
I hate the flip flopping that continues to go on and Hillary is walking a very fine line, she knows that if Obama doesn’t beat McCain she will get the blame for carrying on with this…
Also this will make it very hard for her to run in 2012 she will be laughed at.
When Hillary was up in super delegates it was the super delegates that mattered and not the popular Vote
Why because Obama had the popular vote. But now that he is up in everything she wants Florida and Michigan to count because it’s now the popular vote that counts that is going to win this. (It’s flip flopping)
Hillary and Obama agreed Florida and Michigan would not be allowed because they broke the rules, but when Hillary could see that she wasn’t going to win the nomination that’s when Florida and Michigan were important.
Every card has been played in this Race on both sides… I can agree to disagree with a lot of you here. This isn’t about Me or You it is about BEATING the BUSH Republicans!!
I saw a comment on another site that made a really good point–she claims Florida & Michigan are being disenfranchised. But in her use of the popular vote count, she’s ignoring the caucus states, thereby disenfranchising them.
I just don’t understand why any TRUE democrat would put another REPUBLICAN in office after these last 7 years, but I guess when all us Dems start feeling more of the PINCH that’s when we will vote our party but I truly hope it’s not to late and that we are not selfish like the Republicans say we are.
I agree that Hillary is a better candidate “today if she would have been this candidate” throughout her campaign she would have WON!!

Posted by: BVosler-Cruz | May 22, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Neil,
I am a 65 year old black female and you Hillary supporters are in denial. I don’t think any of you have been called to jury duty wherein you have to weigh the facts against fiction. Absolutely pitiful!!

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Do any of you Live in FL or MI Hell NO….. I do Follow the DA- RULES No one has the right to be angry at Obama. The DNC made the rules and Obama and Clinton Agreed to them, now follow them. We are angry at the Leaders NOT those two!!

Posted by: BVosler-Cruz | May 22, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

In the meantime, I’m just going to keep giggling. This Party is imploding, just like our economy, and is going to sink faster than Titanic and even faster than the value of our currency.
I have had the privilege of voting in 4 Presidential elections, and this will be my 5th. I have proudly and soundly voted Independent in each of those 4 prior elections, and the Dems and Repubs have given me not one single reason to change course this time around.

Posted by: annielee | May 22, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

I think Hillary is right on the mark about this one. All voters should be heard and their votes counted whether a technicality appears to stand in the way. A technicality should never (ever) stand in the way of a voter’s vote. Instead, the technicality should be fixed and/or forgiven and the voters allowed to vote.
The reason states like Florida, Michigan (and California) moved their vote-dates is that they felt disenfranchised in at least the last few elections. Next election, those at the tail end of the primaries will not want to be there simply out of worry their votes will not matter.
By declaring victory before all votes are counted shows an absolute direspect for the voter. Mr. Obama has stood before us as though he were blind and deaf (indifferent) to the pleas by the voters of these states to be counted.
He has yet to do anything to help with this matter which places him in the (I do not care about my constituency as a whole but do care about the win). How does anyone think these states will react the next time? Why would I vote for Obama in the general election when he did not fight to have my vote count during the primaries.
This is typical of a young, inexperienced person still unaware of a need for patience and understanding when it comes to acknowledging the significance of a voters vote.
If we do not allow these two states to have their votes counted, we can kiss good-bye our democracy and our democratic processes which had once served us well.
What Michigan and Florida did shows something else. It shows how desparate they are to be heard. They feel ignored and thrown under the carpet. Everyone knows their problems are real and likely more in need of a shot in the arm than many of the states who have been lucky enough to have been part of the internet, IC and biotech revolutions. Why else would a state commit such an act? They need to be heard and they are being ignored!

Posted by: tom | May 22, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Quintell:
I am for a revote in Florida and Michigan since the Floridians were allowed to vote with the absentee ballots 6 weeks prior to the primary.
Many had not heard of Obama or his cause and voted a familiar name only.
Most voters went to the polls to vote for an decrease in property taxes and just marked Hillary’s name while they were there. Now they are sorry they voted for the decrease in property takes since the state must now reduce the policy officers, fire departments, city workers, etc., and they are complaining about that. Floridians need responsible leaders.
If Obama campaigns in Florida and Michigan, the revote will truly mean victory for him.
Hillary is challenging the revote since she is now uncertain if she would win. That’s why she is screaming “seat the delegates” and “count the votes.”
I know it would be to Obama’s advantage if there would be a revote. Probably after he won the Hillary supporters would still cry “foul” since everything is foul that is not in her favor.

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

no no to bo:
Limited vocabulary???????

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

I am barrack obama supporter , but if ihad to sum up barrack obamas ups and downs , it would be that obama has a big problem.Obamas biggest strength during the 2008 prisidential campaign became his inspirational strength, which in turn attracts large crowds to his rallies.obama lost west virginia and kentucky to clinton for one reason, he dissapointed voters who were counting on him to come to his state. suppose lets say obama and clinton are coming to your state or town, on the same day, my bet is that you are more likely to attend obamas rally, lets say your job has been shipped and you are depressed, and you are looking for inspirational jumpstart, that you will attend obamas rally

Posted by: nu | May 22, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Beth:
What are you smoking? Hilary agreed to the rules. What does this say to children? That it’s ok to break the rules. Hillary is sour grapes and so are you. I live in Illinois and support Obama. He isn’t corrupt, He didn’t have numerous affair like Bill(Why would any women stick with a man who has cheated on her unless she is Hillary Clinton the man), he wasn’t impeached. What you seem to REALLY WANT IS ANOTHER 4 YEARS OF BILL and not Hillary.
You must know that if she were elected, Bill would be running the government again.
I am a women and would like nothing better than to have a women Pres., just not Hillary. Why are you SO AFRAID OF OBAMA? because he’s black, because he might due something that would make are lives better? I really don’t get it?

Posted by: PAL | May 22, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

If California recalled its governor, why can’t Michigan and Florida recall their governors for knowingly moving up the Democrat primary date when they were told they couldn’t. This smells like a tactic from the Republican National Committee to skew the Democrat primary. As long as Democrats have an open primary, Republicans shouldn’t be allowed to mess with another party’s process and it speaks to their basic dishonesty that they did. All we need this time around is another rigged election like what put Bush in office twice. So these two states’ Republican governors have effectively corrupted the American electoral process. Also, why did it take only four years to put electronic voting machines in that are managed by Republican shill companies, that can easily be hacked with no recount (go to BlackBox.org to see the evidence), but they claim it will take 8 to 12 years to put ballots back into paper, when it took another 4 years to put this other garbage in that the Republicans have had put in while in office. How come there’s no paper trail until 2012? ;Why don’t they have enough time now when they had enough time back before the 2004 election to put the machines in? The Republicans are so dishonest on both sides of the election process that we need foreigners to oversee our elections and ink on our thumbs like the Iraqis. How ironic is it that the one who usurped our presidency would think of how to make another country’s process more transparent but won’t allow the same here at home?

Posted by: JL | May 22, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Did you see the crowds in Michigan and Florida?
Most Floridians are world travelers and the color of this man would not be a reason for them to race bait or hate.
Floridians have close access to the Islands and travel frequently in addition to cruising where they meet people of other cultures.
Floridians would get it right, so would Michigan.
Hillary and Bill are the past, Obama is the future.

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

obama supporters need only look in the mirror through their tears and emotional breakdown when they look for someone to blame for obama’s inevitable and ultimate failure

Posted by: chris | May 22, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

An Independent:
Sorry about not getting back here until two hours later to tell you what a f*cking moron you are…I’m not missing facts, don’t need to be told the nominee is decided at the convention (you f*cking child)- perhaps a good point would be for you to try and make a case why Clinton deserves the nomination more, after blowing nearly insurmountable leads in cash, staff, SDs, political apparatus – heck, everything she needed to literally RUN AWAY WITH THIS…
Or perhaps you can just bang your head against a wall until something useful comes out.
The Delegate College angle is weak too, all arguments at this point are moot. The only dialog of worth is how to coalesce around Obama and get a Democrat elected in the fall.
Otherwise go back to your agitator role and write in HRC, Nader or better yet – just stay home – or even better, play in traffic.
Lord Please Find Me an HRC supporter who can make a point of relevance (hint dipsh*ts – relevance is topical, intelligence is just poignant, not necessarily topical).

Posted by: Derek | May 22, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

If Obama was trying to change the rules late in the game, do you think for one minute that Hellary would allow it??? We all know that she would cry foul and verbally attack Obama for trying to do so. Thankfully we’ll have a Democratic nominee with dignity and class.
Go Obama!!!

Posted by: Sue | May 22, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

pal, your ignorance and arrogance is only one of the MANY reasons why obama will not win in November

Posted by: chris | May 22, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Obama has ran a brilliant race. He did it with class and style. Hillary never saw it coming and neither did many of her supporters. Give the man his due.

Posted by: tony | May 22, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Before seating delegates from either state, they would need to hold legitimate primaries. Neither has done so yet,
To those who incessantly and childishly say “I will refuse to vote for Obama”: Do you think that junior high level statement will make someone vote of Hillary? With statements like that, it is no wonder that poll after poll show the uneducated to prefer Hillary.

Posted by: DennisNC | May 22, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Bye HIllary! Nice try! :00 time left. Game over!

Posted by: tony | May 22, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

I Demand That Hillary Clinton
GO HOME and Take the lecher-in-chief
with you!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 22, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

derek…..don’t be too surprised to find yourself unable to comprehend the reasons and justifications why many support Senator Clinton over obama, and why many are unable to support him if he becomes the nominee……the irrationality with which many obama “supporters” conduct themselves with their decisions and their interaction with Clinton supporters all have one thing in common: support for and inspiration from obama, he who used racial politics to attack Senator Clinton unfairly and falsely…..the more irrational many of your fellow supporters become, ever smaller becomes the dwindling chances of obama coming close to winning the general election….

Posted by: chris | May 22, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

Obama, class and style should not be mentioned in the same sentence.
Obama – throws his white grandma under the bus to save his pastor, then throws his pastor under the bus to save himself – great class and style!!
Obama = hypocrite = unelectable

Posted by: Mahesh | May 22, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Everyone is forgetting Hillary is winning the popular vote and I think she has a good shot of taking a win over McCain. With her winning the popular vote if everyone chose to write her in on the ballot in November we would have a clear winner. Let’s forget about all these other people who have done nothing but tell lies and cheat their way to where they are. Remember it doesn’t matter what happens now the only thing that is going to matter is what happens in November.

Posted by: stephanie | May 22, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

admittedly, at this point, it is unlikely that Senator Clinton can win the general election because to make her the nominee now would p1ss off a great many people who are charmed by barack, though her success is not out of the realm of possibility…..obama’s chances are, however…..unless he chooses Clinton as VP, then there is a slight chance of a Democratic Administration…….but already, obama and his racist, sexist, ignorant and arrogant supporters have probably done too much to give them any chance of beating mccain, or more accurately, surviving the beating he will take from a special interest group campaign, a la swift boat vets……

Posted by: chris | May 22, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Game over!

Posted by: tony | May 22, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

disrespecting the Clinton’s = digging your hole deeper (the hole being obama’s inability to win in November)

Posted by: chris | May 22, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Okay,to all you ignorant people who don’t even know the history of Michigan and Florida. Hillary did not change the rules, the DNC did.. They allowed other states to move their primary and decided Florida and Michigan were no good enough. HILLARY NEVER AGEED TO THE SANCTION. SHE AGREED NOT TO CAMPAIGN IN FLORIDA, read her pledge. By the way, OBAMA Had non stop ads running on MSNBC, CNN and other cable station 2 weeks before Florida’s election in direct violation of the PLEDGE he signed. The DNC rules specifically says anyone who campaigns in FL or MI will not get any delegates. Hillary did not campaing Obama did. She should get all the Delegates according to the DNC’s rules.
Obama took his name off the ballot. No one forced him!!!! Hillary kept her name on b/c she did not agree with the sanction. Obama realized it was wrong so he kept his name in Florida where he LOST by 17%. I should know I voted for HILLARY and so did the typically Republican CUBANS who lined up to change the party for her, and those that did not still went to vote for her not realizing they needed to change their party a month before.
OBAMA DOES NOT CARE ABOUT ANYONE BUT OBAMA and his SECRET agenda.
GO HILLARY!!! BY the way you were awesome tonight in Miami which will VOTE HILLARY otherwise McCain the American patriot, not Obama the American hater, friends with the bomber Ayers, friend of Rev . Wright, long time friend of the Corrupt Rezco, who refuses to wear an American Flag or put his hand over his heart during the National Anthem when the Flag is out in direct violation of US Code.
HILLARY ROCKS, SHE RULES THE ELECTORAL MAP!!! Check it out! Madame President Hillary Rodham Clinton—Wooooooooooo AHHHHHHHH YEEEEEEAAAAAA

Posted by: Rima | May 22, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Electability? see electoral-vote.com

Posted by: chris | May 22, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

staniam:
Obama has already won.

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Hillary’s statements in this article are similar to Bush’s statements to get support for the invasion of Iraq. Deceptions, ignoring relevant facts and using irrelevant ones. She is a shyster, too.

Posted by: DennisNC | May 22, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

what kind of politician takes his name off of a ballot in a state that will be crucial in November and which primary could possibly be an issue down the road? only one who is very naive and short-sighted and cannot grasp the wide range of possibilities…..

Posted by: chris | May 22, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

Go to the FL Department of State and add up the numbers for the Republican and Democratic Primaries yourself.
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/elections/resultsarchive/Index.asp?ElectionDate=1/29/2008&DATAMODE=
I just did and here are the numbers for both.
2008 Primary
Republicans: 1,949,498 million voters
Democrats: 1,749,920 million voters
2004 Primary
Democrats: 753,762 voters
Based on these numbers, there were nearly 1 million more voters who showed up for the 2008 Democratic Primary compared to the 2004 Democratic primary. Based on these numbers, I do not see how anyone can claim the election was invalid.
Was the election held in accordance with the state constitution? The election was held, the Secretary of State has certified the results; more people voted than in 2004.
HOW CAN THE DNC SAY A LEGALLY HELD ELECTION DOES NOT COUNT? HOW DARE THE DNC ASSUME THE POWERS OF THE SUPREME COURT TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION.

Posted by: George | May 22, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

Rima: You have said it all..

Posted by: KURT | May 22, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Funny! Funny! If the shoes were reverse and Hillary was the front runner, would she be pushing to include Michigan and Florida. If she is really for a recount, then she needs to split the votes equally. Its moot anyway. Those states are considered rogue states because they disobeyed party rules. If they are included in the count, then next time other states should be able to have their primaries whenever the choose.
Hillary, as usual, is seeking to make a farce of our democracy by fighting dirty once again. She needs to walk away with grace at this point and concede the win to Obama. It was a good fight, but just like everyone else, she received a surprise. Who would have expected to see Obama beat her out. She failed to plan for the long term its cost her dearly. She needs to stop and allow things to move forward without hassle.

Posted by: DK | May 22, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

The Florida and Michigan primaries for the Democrats were invalid because they did not adhere to their own party rules.
This was the Democratic Parties own fault in these two rogue states. The people should be mad at their local governments for screwing things up in the first place.
One question, why was Clinton’s name left on the ballot in Michigan. Something smells here? One can not tell me it was by accident, especially since she is extremely intelligent and savvy.
Hmmm….

Posted by: DK | May 22, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Sandy
Spin (and plagiarism)was the total substance of Senator Obama’s campaign.
I am a minority, but watched him & his surrogates rely on the race card to avoid dealing with substantive issues, until he could take policy crib notes from Clinton.
In the black community all we would hear in the media was Clinton-bashing and defense of Rev. Wright’s views…until it became politically inconvenient for Obama.

Posted by: 12SpeakOut | May 22, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

clinton and her blue collar supporters are nothing but ignorant, racist fools. The can have there ignorance and keep living in the past while today’s America everyone is recognized. If she steals the nomination, I will actively push other African Americans to boycott this election. The clintons are out now for personal glory they should no longer be a member of my party. The clintons will do anything to win just like the Republican Party in 2000 and 2004. All the political pundits who support her should be ashamed of themselves.

Posted by: esteban | May 22, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

I URGE ALL HILARY SUPPORTERS TO BOYCOTT THE DEM PARTY IN NOV IF SHE IS NOT THE CANIDATE. THIS PRIMARY HAS BEEN A JOKE.

Posted by: PEG | May 22, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

C. Jenkins
Obama could have ended this arguement with a revote but at the time he was losing states and it would have been a gamble so now that he is close to winnning now it matters he has been running out the clock these states voted since he had the Revgate, flagpingate, bittegate PA NC OR KY WV Guam. now he cant clinch unless the supers D’s vote. Big Crowds were with GWB and it takes courage for people like me who are young and black to point if he wanted to change the US he couldve been a senator first and gotten some legislation whether he won or lose on the table to back his arguement.
Secty of State in MI, FL have certified the election as legit and the DNC has created this mess and some states were rewarded with extra delegates for not moving up. smells like the backrooms are smokin to me.

Posted by: Quintell | May 22, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

esteban – sounds like the pot calling the kettel…
I am a Hillary supporter and live in rural KY, originally from Ohio. My wife and I both have degrees, and I work white-collar, and I am not a racist fool. I have worked with, and for “persons of color” in many positions over the years.
If someone thinks that Hillary, a woman, would not be a change over the white male career politician, then there is something wrong with them. Anyone who has seen a mother fight for their children would now Hillary could do what is needed to protect this country. I believe she would not criminally commit perjury to invade another nation for her own gains, but I have no doubt that when pushed, she will respond appropriately.

Posted by: George | May 22, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

you’re waisting your time trying to be logical with hillary and her supporters. their freaked out minds won’t let them accept that THE RULES OF THE GAME IS DELEGATE COUNT NOT POPULAR VOTE. but again, stop waisting you’re time!! its pointless

Posted by: starsailor | May 22, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

you’re waisting your time trying to be logical with hillary and her supporters. their freaked out minds won’t let them accept that THE RULES OF THE GAME IS DELEGATE COUNT NOT POPULAR VOTE. but again, stop waisting you’re time!! its pointless

Posted by: starsailor | May 22, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

She starts practicing a flip-flop policy whatever it takes to benefit herself.

Posted by: Han | May 22, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am

The superdelegate debacle is a result of our need for instant gratification. What was the DNC thinking? That we are not smart enough? The SD is a way for the DNC to control the election and keep multiple votes on the convention floor from happening.
Delegates are in the electoral process because the fathers of this country thought it was a better process to get delegates together to determine the winner. Voters were thought to be too ignorant, and to count the votes across the colonies would have taken weeks.
In today’s automation age, there isn’t a reason elections aren’t determined by popular vote instead of delegates. Years ago it would have taken weeks to count the vote. Today, we have results within hours of the polls closing.
Reform? Get rid of delegates.

Posted by: George | May 22, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

Senator Clinton worked very hard and for a very long time to be President, it is unfortunate someone has to lose. Senator Clinton seems to have lost sight of the goals which is to save lives in Iraq and at home for people without healthcare. She has completely lost sight of this,the ultimate objective. It is truly a shame.

Posted by: Newsrook | May 22, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

There is no telling what she would do to make sure Obama looses because she was defeated by him.

Posted by: moeen | May 22, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

People this is so very silly. Ok, just give the nomination to Hillary and then we can expect all the whining to stop. Right. I mean what better way to placate people who feel aggrieved that Hillary lost this contest fair and square.
That Hillary supporters expect Obama’s supporters to simply line up behind Hillary come November if the nomination is stolen from Obama after all these, is just unbelievable.

Posted by: alagbon | May 22, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Count the votes!
If the DNC does not allow for the counting of the votes, then 2008 will mark the year of Democratic hypocrisy.
2000 and Al Gore will materialize as meaningless.
Count the votes.
We often say Get out the Vote, and Rock the Vote, but what does either phrase mean if the Democrats don’t care?

Posted by: marisa | May 22, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

I think that I’m finally learning about Obama.
1. If the votes are not cast for you, don’t count them.
2. If you’re going to lose a state, just quit campaigning there.
3. If neither one nor two works, then hire lawyers to block the Florida and Michigan votes.
4. If 1-3 do not work, then declare yourself presumptive nominee despite the fact that you do NOT have the requisite votes.
I get it. He’s finally not a blank slate.
I preferred when he was–he’s just another chicago style politician.
Maybe he should have run for the Republican nomination.
He’d fit in better in that camp.

Posted by: brandy | May 22, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

I’ll say it again! Regardless of what GOP or DNC think, or whether or not candidates decided they had to go along with disenfranchizing at the time, it was wrong and those votes need counting! Otherwise legitimate voters will be cheated and the election possibly stolen, or at least corrupted, again.
Sen Clinton referenced the court decision that ended the 2000 recount:
“Your Supreme Court said it’s not about the technicalities, or about the contestants, it’s about the will of the people and, whenever you we can understand their intent, it should govern. Well it’s very clear what the 1.7 million people intended here in Florida.”
There is no good reason not to count…and don’t tell me that Obama wasn’t on the ballot, because that was his poor choice, again! He was even offered a revote, which he turned down…now why is that…obviously FL & MI voters are not important to him in primaries.
HILLARY, KEEP FIGHTING! Because you’re the only one to put America back on it’s feet and what happens in the USA has a knock on affect throughout the world!

Posted by: Di | May 22, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

“Where were Bill and Hillary when John Kerry needed them in 2004? Did they really breath a sigh of relief when he was defeated? ” By Badger
Bill Clinton was in the hospital recovering after a very serious surgery. He left the hospital early, against his doctors advice, to campaign for Mr. Kerry. A democrat would know that. Another little hit job?

Posted by: JDinPA | May 22, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

OBAMA SUPPORTERS ARE SO OUT OF TOUCH WITH THE MIDDLE CLASS AND THOSE WHO ARE LOW INCOME AND WHO ARE STRUGGLING TO MAKE ENDS MEET. DO YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS LIKE TO LIVE PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK AND NOT HAVE INSURANCE FOR YOURSELF AND YOUR FAMILY. HILLARY CLINTON IS STILL IN THIS RACE BECAUSE MILLIONS OF AMERICANS BELIEVE IN HER AND WANT HER TO CONTINUE. ALL THE HATEFUL AND BITTER REMARKS THAT HAVE BEEN POSTED HERE BY OBAMA SUPPORTERS INDICATES TO ME THAT YOU ARE FULL OF CRAP JUST LIKE YOUR PRECIOUS, WANNA BE MLK, WANNA CESAR CHAVEZ, WANNA JFK, OBAMA YOU ARE ALL ELITIST AND OBVIOUSLY DON’T HAVE ANY COMPASSION FOR LOWER INCOME PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY. I AM LIVING PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK AND KNOW WHAT IT IS LIKE TO STRUGGLE. I AM PROUD OF HILLARY CLINTON. I BELIEVE IN HER AND SHE IS A WONDERFUL LADY. OBAMA SUPPORTERS HERE ARE HATEFUL, BITTER PEOPLE WHO HAVE SHOWN ME THAT THEY ARE INTIMADATED BY HILLARY CLINTON. YOU ARE SELF-SERVING AND INCONSIDERATE INDIVIDUALS. HILLARY IS STILL IN THIS RACE BECAUSE PEOPLE WANT HER TO CONTINUE. OTHERWISE PEOPLE WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED IN WEST VIRGINIA, KENTUCKY, AND OREGON. IF YOU BELIEVE SO MUCH THAT OBAMA WILL EVENTUALLY WIN THEN YOU SHOULD NOT BE SO AGAINST WITH THE VOTES IN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN BEING COUNTED. HILLARY CLINTON, GOD BLESS YOU AND THANK YOU FOR CONTINUING TO FIGHT FOR THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN YOU.

Posted by: MaryGrace | May 22, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

I just want to know the precise moment that the Democrats became the Republicans?
They penalize Florida and Michigan even though other states violated the rules–e.g. Georgia and South Carolina.
But since Georgia and SC went to Obama, the DNC has decided not to penalize those voters.
One person, one vote does not mean a thing to the Democrats.
In Florida, they’ll be lucky to get 1/2 of a vote per person.
If not Hillary, then McCain.

Posted by: Mia | May 22, 2008, 3:33 am 3:33 am

I saw Bill working his recovering from heart surgery butt off in Philadelphia stumping for that Judas Kerry.
Bill looked pale and underweight, but was commanding a crowd of thousands upon thousands in Center City.
For Kerry.
There is no loyalty in the Dem Party.
It’s politics as usual.
We all expected more from the Dems.
McCain will win in November.
Bet your farm on it.
Or if you’re an Obama fan, bet your mansion on it.

Posted by: jackie | May 22, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Nice of you to relate HRC’s current remarks on the Michigan and Florida results. Now go back and do the rest of your job as journalists: go back and bring us the statements from her campaign when her campaign agreed with those of the rest of the candidates that DNC did the right thing when it decided not to count the states that moved their primaries forward without authorization. Which HRC will we believe? HRC 2007? Or HRC 2008?
By the way, in retrospect it was pretty stupid of the Florida and Michigan parties to move their primaries so far forward in the process. As things developed, if they had left the primaries where they were in the schedule, these states would have been pivotal in selecting the nominee.

Posted by: Tom in California | May 22, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

I’m turning 18 in June.
My teachers always said that voteing mattered.
Now i feel like I shouldnt’ even bother.
The Democrates will only count votes for Obamma.
That means my vote isnt’ going to count sense i was goin to vote for hilary.

Posted by: Amber | May 22, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

the ultimate difference between racism and sexism in this ridiculously over-publicized “battle royale” is that the still-rampant racism that we know all too well today is rooted in a deep fear that is steeped in guilt amongst many, and also driven by near-rage in others… thankfully our collective civility at least allows us to mire such ugly behavior in passive-aggressiveness …women were never slaves under federal law, hate to say it but it’s most undoubtedly true… how can someone honestly say that Obama hasn’t seen just as much of a cloaked animosity from our media coverage as has Clinton based on their respective divergence from the gender/race status quo amongst US presidential candidates?
this entire unabashedly, unbelievably over-dramaticized nonsense concerning the Rev Wright’s statements being as toxic as they are, and for Obama to have to answer for them is COMPLETELY racist and an incredible double-standard… and am i the only person who thinks what the Rev actually said ISN’T THAT AWFUL? i mean… really, is it THAT terrible to you people? you have no ability to step outside your own brain for a moment? i mean i know we all think our perspective is the 100% notarized truth, or we all wouldnt be blogging!

Posted by: mrfreedomx | May 22, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

She leads only if you give her 328,000 votes for the Soviet-style Michigan election, while giving Obama zero for not being on the ballot. And if you then ignore the caucuses of Iowa, Nevada, Maine, and my own state of Washington — where a record quarter million people turned out to participate. Our votes don’t count under Clinton’s math. She disappears them down the memory hole of history in an argument that invents reality as much as Bush’s claims of Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction or Clinton’s earlier story about running the gauntlet of Bosnian sniper fire.

Posted by: kevin | May 22, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am

THE RULES OF THE GAME IS DELEGATE COUNT NOT POPULAR VOTE
==================
the FINAL rules will be made by the little people of Florida, Michigan, Pennsylania and all the low-income people…. in other words, obama’s chances at the Oval office got flushed with people like Michelle, You and obama himself.
………. how do u like us Hillary supporters now?

Posted by: WE, THE LITTLE PEOPLE | May 22, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

obama keeps harping on Bush Third term.
THERE IS NO BUSH THIRD TERM. BUT THERE IS A MCCAIN FIRST TERM.
………. obama continues to fight Bush – he thinks this is his trump card but its going to squash him in the end. Cant wait for the first debate with McCain – we all know what obama looks like in a debate, dont we? No One to HIde behing…… and ooooooppppss there you have him. HIS NUMBERS WILL TANK WITH EACH DEBATE AND BY THE END OF THE PROCESS HE WILL BE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE POND.

Posted by: i call um like i see um | May 22, 2008, 4:03 am 4:03 am

You would not want a friend like Barack Obama. Nor a President like him
Look how he behaved toward friends who helped him go forward. All thrown under the bus because their association did not look goon on Baracks CV.
Barack threw his white grandmother under the bus after all she has done for him, and he had nurtured hatered toward his mothers’ race as he writes in his book. Barack also writs that in adversity he will side with muslims if he was forced to chose… not with Americans who enabled him to go to college and have a good life.
Now he wants the top job without earning it in any shape or form.
Barack as a person does not fit the mould.
America has not run out of educated, experienced and patriotic people… why on earth would they want to elect a muslim born junior senator without any political experience???

Posted by: Retrovvision | May 22, 2008, 4:06 am 4:06 am

Clinton is the visable Voice of Florida and Michingan… but she need do nothing. If not her they will still demand their votes be counted. and they WILL.
dnc is posturing but TWO STATES CANNOT BE DENIED… ARE the people in michigan so stupid that they didnt comprehend the instructions: “IF YOUR CANDIDATE NOT ON BALLOT PLEASE VOTE UNCOMMITTED” – Obama, DNC insult the intellect of Michigans who voted uncommitted and also voted hillary clinton.
obama is in florida trying to sucker as many to his side before Clinton makes the case for the votes to be counted….IT WAS SMART OF HER TO GO THERE THE SAME TIME HE’S THERE.

Posted by: a vote is a vote | May 22, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

obama fights mcCain by pounding on Bush.
obama’s supporters fight Hillary by pouncing on Bill or Chelsea…. I SAY THEY GOT NO GAME!

Posted by: ship o-ghouls | May 22, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am

““We believe that the outcome of our elections should be determined by the will of the people.” If you Republicans really believed that we wouldn’t have had years of the great bumbler Bush

Posted by: Harvey Stockwood | May 22, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am

“Your Supreme Court said it’s not about the technicalities or about the contestants it’s about the will of the people and whenever you we can understand their intent it should govern. Well it’s very clear what the 1.7 million people intended here in Florida.”
====================
i see obama falling flat on his face….. he really thinks he is the unquestionable nominee……. not so fast……. that is whay we have voters…. the same voters as in Michigan and Florida and Puerto Rico.
……….. not so fast obama.

Posted by: NOT SO FAST MISTER | May 22, 2008, 4:33 am 4:33 am

The fact of the matter is that Polling stations were open for business in Florida and Michigan – and people went and did their civic duties. They voted in masses, biggest turn out because they wanted to be counted, and did not want to loose out like last time.
If anything was out of order, the DN should have ordered to CLOSE ALL VOTING STATIONS but they DID NOT. Everything went ahead as normal.
In MI every candidate was on the list. Some candidates have taken their name of the list, by own free choice (candidates have a right to withdraw from a race if they so wish), and as a result, they are not getting any delegages nor votes for Michigan.
In Florida, one candidate (Obama) went against the rules and was actively campaigning even though he signed an agreement that he will not campaign – and therefore such a candidate has to be struck off the list, and denied any votes or delegates. If it went to court, this is how the judge would rule.
Obama supporters, you have to look at this process objectively, and democratically, and you will see that it is totally out of line to “nominate” anyone before all the votes are counted and assessed in 50 states! – not 48 or 57 states as some might think!!!

Posted by: Retrovvision | May 22, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

Sounds to me like all the Clinton supporters out there are acting like cry babies abd Clinton herself is no better. She, herself said to not count Florida or Michigan before this race began, but now that she has lost to the better candidate, she’s crying the blues and reversing herself once again (remember IRAQ)and calling for those two states to be counted. If the rules in which the game is played mean that little to her, then what does this say about her so called INTEGRITY. It’s time to bring the curtain down on this circus. puuuuuleeeeeese!

Posted by: John | May 22, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

The sooner Hillary quits the better. At least then we’ll no longer have to put up with these cross-dressing Republicans pretending to be Democrats. And just why DO so many of them want to take on the identities of women?

Posted by: Pollay Bergen | May 22, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

Some one please correct me if I”m wrong but I thought the reason we vote is based on issues that will help make this country a better place for our up and coming youthf to live in?
I vote on issues not on personalities, genders or race or am I a minority novice? Oops there goes that word again

Posted by: Debbie | May 22, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am

Frankly, it’s time to throw Hillary out of the Democratic Party

Posted by: underthebusplease | May 22, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am

count every vote : excuse me, it is Hillary who wants to count zero votes for Michigan Obama supporters, even those who actually showed up that day and voted. How is that “counting every vote” ?

Posted by: Alex | May 22, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

How ironic, the woman who – with her suppoprters – was telling us that every primary area she lost in didn’t count, now says she wants to count every vote. And she says she wants to count every vote even though Obama wasn’t even on the ballot in one state.
Is this a shining example of “feminist”, woman-positive politics? She and her supporters make me feel ashamed.

Posted by: Jaisha Lanson | May 22, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

Small states don’t count… except for when you are losing so then the small states do count.
The only votes that count are from large states except for when you are losing and so then it is okay to count votes from small states.
Caucuses don’t count except for when you are losing and then caucuses count.

Posted by: A-mused | May 22, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am

“Why can’t Obama seal the deal?”
He’s sealed it. Hillary just doesn’t know when she’s out.

Posted by: Marcus | May 22, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am

As someone from Michigan I know many of us will be outraged if our “primary” is counted. Hillary herself said that it wasn’t going to count and many people did not vote because of that.

Posted by: Steve | May 22, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Anyone who supports Clinton now, but will switch to McCain if she loses, knows absolutely nothing about politics. General elections are not a popularity contest–voters are being asked to choose between two fundamentally different political philosophies. If you don’t understand those philosphies, you should do us all a favor and stay home (especially you poor people who vote Republican–you have no idea what you are doing, and are too stupid to ever realize it).

Posted by: Heliocracy | May 22, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

The electorial maps of the past are irrelevant because people moved where the jobs are — well, except for the states Hillary is winning (WV, KY, OH, PA). VA, GA and NC will definitely vote Obama this election year. Check the demographics if you don’t believe it.
Obama ’08

Posted by: Demographics | May 22, 2008, 5:26 am 5:26 am

“it wont stop genuine Hillary supporters for not voting for Obama”
It’s called cutting off your nose to spite your face

Posted by: spiteisnotavirtue | May 22, 2008, 5:37 am 5:37 am

As I’ve been saying over and over in a hundred ways since January – count the votes or perish.
That Clinton would benefit from the outset was coincidental to it being the legally and morally right thing to do.
She would win those states so no revote is not democracy or the Democratic party stance so it is astoundingly ignorant to railroad the chosen states.
The 100% instead of 50% penalty was prima-dona Brazile-nut railroading.
What about South Carolina? Smoke and mirrors magic tricks do not represent the voters.
He got zero votes in Michigan.
He ran ads and campaigned in Fl by speaking to the press and ran a campaign in Mi through surrogates. He removed his name to play the Iowa NH voters up. The rules state the delegates SHALL be seated.
The RBC will be televised. Anything more than zero votes for OB in either states is actually going against the rules.
The hanging chad paper ballot issue was attatched in Florida and the dems hands were tied by republicans led by Crist.
People who are ignorant of the facts are doomed to follow leaders to a loss.
The voters spoke loud and clear, millions of them. It is time to follow the rules and do what is right. If they had played by the rules from the start Clinton would have never lost her double digit leads.
The eyes of the world will judge them on May 31st. They must follow all the rules if they are to follow any of them.
Picking and chosing and giving Obama votes he did not actually get is not legitimate and undemocratic.
But hey, we got the power to vote with our feet. And we already are in anticipation of the cult taking over the party and railroading out the core.

Posted by: karen | May 22, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am

“Florida has NEVER MATTERED to Obama!” Didn’t matter a jot to Hillary until she needed it. How many states has she said don’t count now?

Posted by: Harvey Stockwood | May 22, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am

“That Clinton would benefit from the outset was coincidental to it being the legally and morally right thing to do.”
SHE did not think so. Neither did her campaign manager. Until her back was against the wall.

Posted by: Not on your life | May 22, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am

If you Hillary supporters seriusly want every vote counted you’ll run the vote again in BOTH states with both parties campaigning and Obama ON THE BALLOT. I’ll support that 100%. Anything else is just spoiled little girls stamping their feet at a birthday party.

Posted by: Stop stamping your feet | May 22, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am

It’s amazing to me that all of the incredibly nasty Obama supporters don’t want Florida and Michigan to count. Obama is the dishonest one. I can tell you that Obama will not win Florida in the general election. People who are older are not fooled by this guy, hence the older people for Hillary or McCain….he does not know what he is doing….we can’t have a President who is learning on the job.

Posted by: Jenna | May 22, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am

WES, WHAT CHANGE?

Posted by: E.T. | May 22, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am

Both states should count or have revote in their respective Aug. primaries:
DNC Delegate Selection Rule 11A [PDF], states the following:
No meetings, caucuses, conventions or primaries which constitute the first determining stage in the presidential nomination process (the date of the primary in primary states, and the date of the first tier caucus in caucus states) may be held prior to the first Tuesday in February or after the second Tuesday in June in the calendar year of the national convention. Provided, however, that the Iowa precinct caucuses may be held no earlier than 22 days before the first Tuesday in February; that the Nevada first-tier caucuses may be held no earlier than 17 days before the first Tuesday in February; that the New Hampshire primary may be held no earlier than 14 days before the first Tuesday in February; and that the South Carolina primary may be held no earlier than 7 days before the first Tuesday in February. In no instance may a state which scheduled delegate selection procedures on or between the first Tuesday in February and the second Tuesday in June 1984 move out of compliance with the provisions of this rule.
Thus, the rules were not only broken by Florida and Michigan, but also by Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. Iowa held their caucus on January 3, 2008 instead of January 14. New Hampshire held their primary on January 8, 2008 instead of January 22. South Carolina held their primary on January 26, 2008 instead of January 29.
The penalty for violating Rule 11A, according to DNC Delegate Selection Rule 20C1a [PDF], states:
In the event the Delegate Selection Plan of a state party provides or permits a meeting, caucus, convention or primary which constitutes the first determining stage in the presidential nominating process to be held prior to or after the dates for the state as provided in Rule 11 of these rules, or in the event a state holds such a meeting, caucus, convention or primary prior to or after such dates, the number of pledged delegates elected in each category allocated to the state pursuant to the Call for the National Convention shall be reduced by fifty (50%) percent, and the number of alternates shall also be reduced by fifty (50%) percent. In addition, none of the members of the Democratic National Committee and no other unpledged delegate allocated pursuant to Rule 8.A. from that state shall be permitted to vote as members of the state’s delegation. In determining the actual number of delegates or alternates by which the state’s delegation is to be reduced, any fraction below .5 shall be rounded down to the nearest whole number, and any fraction of .5 or greater shall be rounded up to the next nearest whole number.
According to Rule 20C1a, Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Michigan, and Florida should have had their delegates reduced by 50%. However, Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina were not penalized at all to protect their first-in-the-nation status, while Michigan and Florida were stripped of all their delegates. Thus, the DNC is applying the rules arbitrarily. ****source
With thanks to Gary Mc

Posted by: Mike | May 22, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am

HAHAHAHA
So much fun to watch Obama and his minions trying to win the presidency by NOT COUNTING THE VOTES. If his MISSION IS ACCOMPLISHED, then what is he afraid of???
Count the Votes or Drop Out — Obama!
We remember 2000 when Republicans wouldn’t count the votes.
We will NOT forget 2008 if OBAMA/DNC doesn’t count the votes!

Posted by: KathleenVT | May 22, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am

Retrovvision – The DNC does not have the authority to close the voting stations in a state – First of all – it wasn’t just Democrats who were voting. Second, the people weren’t ONLY voting for a presidential candidate – there would have been other offices on the ballot.
If Hillary didn’t like the rules, she shouldn’t have AGREED to abide by them. It wasn’t until AFTER things weren’t going in her favor that she suddenly had a problem with them. It’s typical Clinton thinking… You don’t like the results, change the definition to fit what you want to do.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | May 22, 2008, 6:48 am 6:48 am

staniam – And I won’t vote for Obama if she IS on the ticket -So I guess we cancel each other out.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | May 22, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

Obama is already listening to the fat lady singing the blues for him.
The democrats were wholly behind Gore in 2000.
The democrats were wholly behind Kerry in 2004.
We LOST the White House both times.
The democrat party is now divided straight down the middle with a large majority of one half of the party unwilling to vote for Obama, and rather more willing to cross the aisle and vote for a Republican who they feel is the lesser of two evils.
Now, if we could not get our guys elected in 00 & 04 when we were united behind them, what makes any of you Obama supporters think you can get your guy in this time when half the party thinks he is the devil’s advocate?
Do you all think we are going to change our minds in November? Good luck with that.

Posted by: Patty | May 22, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Clinton Demands Florida, & Michigan, Votes Count:
This is very wrong, the votes should not
count as, they were told before hand. Now the Clintons want to “change” the game! the Population of Michigan, alone has 10,000,000 people. under 500,000 votes were casted! 1000′s of voters stayed home because they were told they
vote would not count. All the people that followed the rules would be “screwed” out of their vote if, the
Clintons get their way. Hillary Clinton, is really starting to look like a Hypocrite. Based, on the facts
that she agreed and knew the two states
would not count.

Posted by: Derek, | May 22, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Patty- You gave it away when you said “false prophet.” It is really sad to me that the far right has painted Obama as everything from a racist to the anti-christ. That is so crazy. He is a man who makes mistakes, loves his family and has run an outstanding political campaign. There is a sick element outhere that uses the above tactics because THEY are so afraid of a black man in the Whtie House. I hate using the race thing – but am convinced that is really what is underneath all this. I am a white woman, a grandmother and a Christian and I say that he is a better candidate than either Clinton or McCain. It is about nothing else. Read his books, listen, turn off the blogs and learn what is real and what is just vicious imagination.

Posted by: gm | May 22, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

My question to you all…is this fight for recount about the voters or is it about Hilary?? cos I dont understand;
1.why Hilary didnt bring up the 2000 scenario when the Decision was first made to Leave Michigan and Florida out.
2.why CLinton didnt take it upon herself to fight for the the FL & MH voter immediately the decision was made.
3.Why Hilary initially AGREED to the decision to leave Michigan and FLorida out.
………then all of a sudden she has become the freedom fighter for these voter’s. com ‘on if she was ahead do you think shed give a #@%#* what happened to you folks in Florida and Michigan…..I think not

Posted by: arure | May 22, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

why would anyone expect anything different from the clintons—as they have been involved in corruption for over 30 years—-and this is an attempt to pull off another act..she needs to pack up her carpet bag and go home –i feel that more and more we are all getting a little smarter.

Posted by: rodney | May 22, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

due to the fact that hillary was at one time republican–is this attempt to disrupt and split the democratic party quite simply an attempt to help MCcain—i sure would like to know how many republicans are behind her.

Posted by: rodney | May 22, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

gm
Why is it that whenever someone says they will not support Obama it is about race?
It is about nothing but this man’s character,and that of his friends and associates.
Please don’t try and feed me the kool-aide, I live in Chicago and know exactly how low this man can go,who he associates with, and who threw under the bus to get to where he is.
I voted for this man for Senate.
Fool me once….

Posted by: Patty | May 22, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

Message to Howard Dean:
Well how do you like your party now? Look what your incompetence has grown, a divided party irreparably beyond help and doomed to lose in nov. This is the same man that lost his bid to be president, YEE HAW!
The democrats are about to add to the insult by nominating someone that is not electable and now nothing can be done about it. Further insulting voters by taking away their vote and then comming back in the GE asking for their votes, HOW PATHETIC!
You now have Obama down in Fla trying to coo the voters and sooth over wounds but, he just doesn’t get it, you have already disenfranchised the very people you need to win. The older generation and women voters will remember this slap in the face come nov, you can be sure.
People in my state are already justifying a vote for McCain, rather than vote for Obama because they are that upset with the DNC. The feeling this election has been rigged from the beginning is gaining momentum in this country and you are already starting to hear grumbling about buyers remorse.
For all of you that read this and feel the same way, now is the time to send this message to Dean, Pelosi, Reid and superdelegates that they have sold us out. REGISTER INDEPENDENT

Posted by: Average Joe | May 22, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

gmt
thanks most people on here are not aware of clintons sorted past and need to be enlightned.MCcain is just a bush clone

Posted by: rodney | May 22, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

average joe
hillary is good at what she does—split the party

Posted by: rodney | May 22, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Why not revoting in Florida and Michigan? Someone wrote here that BO sent lawyers to block that possibility. Why?

Posted by: Jane | May 22, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Rodney…..Can you honestly say you still feel your candidate can win in nov. Even if only a small portion of the people disenfranchised by the party don’t vote or vote McCain, you will lose the swing states. Game over!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 22, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

joe
just my point –hillary is trying to make sure of that —i would say that she is doing more for republicans than she is for her own supposidly party.

Posted by: rodney | May 22, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

I used to have a lot of respect for Mrs Clinton, she agreed to this whole thing. Now that she is loosing she wants to change the rules, I have heard of sore loosers in my days but this is really bad for a lady this smart. It’s a desperation move, oh so so sad.

Posted by: Jerry D | May 22, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

rodney,
We say the same for Obama.

Posted by: Patty | May 22, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Its not a desperate move… it is a move justified by the constitution… the DNC is the one that broke the law… Clinton supporters will not back down!

Posted by: dem38 | May 22, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

i am 70 years old–and due to the last 16 years of corruption and wars—i must now go to work thanks to willy and wallmart i have one of those super paying jobs ha ha.
my view of candidates
obama—a pickup truck load of baggage
MCcain—–a bush clone
hillary 30 years of scandal and corruption—a semi trailer load of baggage—and that is the facts

Posted by: rodney | May 22, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Clinton did want a revote and Obama did block it with lawyers… they will seat the Delegates as certified because that is the only right thing to do… Obama is the one who is shady!

Posted by: dem38 | May 22, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

dem
talk about sense—-rules were made for all dem party fl. and mch. broke them—-caused their own problem—
seems like you may be a republican—n.t.s.

Posted by: rodney | May 22, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Since Hillary people will not vote for Obama, and Obama people will not vote for Hillary, the super delegates should toss them both and nominate Gore.
They need to hurry though, before Gore does something stupid like endorse one of the two and end up alienating half the dems all over again.
This would at least give us a shot at the White House this time.

Posted by: Jack | May 22, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

jack—-gore is busy making millions on global warming bs—-all less than 1% that we may be responsible for.
they all use us to no end but make millions in process—ask the clintons how it is done—-nafta or china trade agreements something no one can deny–

Posted by: rodney | May 22, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

OK HRC supporters, answer this question:
IF HRC manages to STEAL the nomination away from Obama using “dirty math”, how does she get his supporters behind her?
How does SHE win without US??
Anybody…….jump in….don’t all talk at once….(cue the crickets)

Posted by: MI VOTER | May 22, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

MI Voter
I don’t think Hillary can win without Obama supporters.
I believe we will all be saying President McCain.

Posted by: Patty | May 22, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Dems…know that Florida Democrats didn’t decide to move up their primary. Florida’s Republican controlled congress made that decision. Democrats in Florida’s congress overwhelmingly voted AGAINST moving their primary up because the DNC made it clear the consequences would be. I’m no fan of Hillary’s (by a long shot) but I question the fairness of not counting Florida’s votes. Florida Democrats got shanked by Florida’s congress. Go OBAMA!

Posted by: LowB44 | May 22, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

this all issue of barack and hillary supporters makes me laugh,the republicans are quietly laughing at your ignorance,lets put it this way,you all are enthusiastically supporting your candidates because you really want to vote repubs out,okey,given that both candidates represent the dem’s agendas and not repub’s agendas,they are also similar in many of their positions which reflect your wishes and demands,why can’t u take just a time to think of whether you should vote a some one whose party is really different from what you stand for and believe or vote for some one who represents the party which stand for your interests?they are all dems after all,all these noises of “i won’t vote for this one if my favourite is not nominated” is ridiculous coz at the day who your vote decision was ruled by emotions and not your brains(reasons) and that who he or she really thought and put his or her own and his or her party interests before naything else will all be hurt,who to blame then,when repubs will laugh at your stupidity and idiocy and continue to mess your country ,wake up people before it’s too late!

Posted by: mike | May 22, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Patty,
All I know is that if she does, I will vote Bob Barr as a protest vote. I’ll encourage all Obama supporters to do the same.
Bob Barr lead the Repubs. effort to impeach Bill Clinton after the Lewinsky affair.
I think it’s funny, karma, baby!!

Posted by: MI VOTER | May 22, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

MI Voter
I think Jack has it right. The super delegates are supposed to nominate someone who they think can actually win the GE. It sure does not look like either of our candidates have a shot this time.
Hell, maybe they should go find us a black woman.

Posted by: Patty | May 22, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

I have yet not decided whether I am happy or sad to see the Old Democratic party in its “last throws.”
To argue for one candidate or another while ignoring the voters is a straw man argument.
There does not occur to me any good reason to ever “not count” American votes.
It was not right when the Republicans used this trick in 2000 against Gore and it is not right to do so now. This can handle be argued.
Mr. Obama, should he win the nomination by any means which includes gaining votes he did not earn (as in Florida), will not stand a chance at winning the GE.
Clinton may lose a lot of black voters but she has the women, the elderly, Hispanics, Jews, Asians, working class and a great many in between — something largely ignored and often dismissed.
Lastly, for those who say the Florida votes should not count because some Obama supporters did not vote thinking their vote would not count –
How in the world do you quantify that number? Further, are we to take away votes from the winner because the opponent’s voters didn’t show up? Ultimately, the responsibility for political tactic and mobilization lands on the candidate. If Obama failed to recognize that the votes could later on be challenged, that was his error. Just as he used political tactic by not putting his name on the ballot in PA while Clinton was savvy enough to plan ahead.
But there is no arguing with the devoted. What would be called brilliance in someone else, is a bad trait in Mrs. Clinton.
Like firing the best plumber in town because you don’t like him while standing in two feet of toilet water and the only alternative is the guy who “hopes” he can get it fixed for you.

Posted by: Sleepy Beauty | May 22, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

“Below” Average Joe,
Don’t insult my intelligence. I know how the nomination process works.
I know the “offical” nomination doesn’t take place until the Convention.
I’m discussing the “dirty math” HRC is trying to use.
If she wanted my vote to count, why did she agree to the sanctions?

Posted by: MI VOTER | May 22, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Patty,
A black woman! I would LOVE that!
But you are wrong. We DO have a chance. The Repubs know this. They are terrified. They know Dems had this election in the bag.
So what do the REpubs do? Divide and conquer. They started a whisper campaign about Obama.
They use the Karl Rove “Fear and Smear”.
And we buy it hook, line and sinker.
The DNC needs to split the Delegates in MI and FL equally between the two.
We need to be UNITED against the REPUBSD in the fall.

Posted by: MI VOTER | May 22, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

I don’t understand voters coming out to support Clinton when she has lost the delegate count. We all know when you play a game and someone is losing they try to change the rules at the end. What type of character does that suggest to you? I don’t want a president with those qualities. She should shut up and play by the rules SHE AGREED TO MONTHS AGO!!!!!She lost, try again in 2012. Next time she gathers voters, they should chat, support the party. Let everyone vote. What about the people in Florida and Michigan that didn’t vote because they understood the rules. You want to punish those people for abiding by the rules? Hillary is an embarrassment to the party. Change the rules after this election. That’s fair. National elections are won by the constitution rules, electoral college. Remmber that?
Amend the constitution but don’t try to change the rules when it appears you have lost.

Posted by: Honay Rogers | May 22, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

There is no chance as things stand.
You are right, we need to be united to win. Even when we are totally united is is hard to win, 00 & 04.
I will never again vote for Obama. Will you vote for Hillary?
Therein lies my point. We all need someone we can unite behind, or we will all be saying President McCain.
Now you can blame my candidate, and I can blame your candidate.
We will still end up saying “President McCain”

Posted by: Patty | May 22, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

I know the “offical” nomination doesn’t take place until the Convention.
I’m discussing the “dirty math” HRC is trying to use.
If she wanted my vote to count, why did she agree to the sanctions?
————
you are either a CLUELESS buying the media FRAUD or simply dishonest.
WHEN did hillary ‘agree to sanctions’?
if by “sanctions you mean not counting the votes – you are simply a BIG LIAR!
even if she ever did agree to that, this is AMERICA = FREE COUNTRY. In America we are ALL FREE TO CHANGE OUR MINDS!
FL wants the votes to be counted. MI wants the votes to be counted. and now Hillary wants those votes to be counted. and you know what? the millions of voters in FL and MI want their votes to be counted or they would have never voted in the first place.
and you know what, over 17 million people who support hillary want those votes to be counted.
this is called DEMOCRACY!
if you do not want to count the votes you should go to zimbabwe. two elections (2000 and 2004) are ENOUGH for fraudulently counting votes in America.
so what you call ‘dirty math’ translates into ‘COUNT ALL VOTES”!
again, if counting ALL votes is dirty for you – zimbabwe will take you, i’m sure!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 22, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

You have to be president of all 50 states- not 48. Count the votes – all of them from FL and Michigan. It is only fair to count all the states and PR and Guam if we are to be considered a true democracy. Since Obama has been against counting these states from the start- it should be duly noted by Republicans in the upcoming election and the dems will get slammed for that. The Obama supporters will do ANYTHING to make him the nominee- even if he doesnt actually win it fairly. this is the same comment made of Hillary. Lets put the shoe on the foot that being unfair here- Obama. He is a passive-agressive sexist that is having his way through surrogates and appears be “so nice” and “gracious to Hillary”- what a crock- we can all see right through that. Oh year – I am an egg head for Hillary- ( 2 PhD’s) and caucasian as well- so much for all the pundits classification that you need to be a poor and indigent fool to vote for her. Dr Z

Posted by: Dr Jack B Zito | May 22, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Count all the votes- no excuses, please.

Posted by: David | May 22, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

GA summed it up masterfully. Voting for McBush just quarantee another war, higher gas prices, no health care. Voting against Obama is only hurting the country and please don’t complain if McBush is our next president. Have you listened to him lately. He is constantly making huge mistakes. McBush seem to do more apologizeing than any other candidate in the last 50 years. McBush is not well physically nor mentally. He blows his temper at the drop of a hat. I don’t see him being a serious negotiator. McBush would be worse than Bush who is the world Jack-In-The-Box. Countries and continents are laughing at us. We have no friends.

Posted by: Honay Rogers | May 22, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

the stupidity of this conversation is that DNC will seat FL and MI delegates. everyone agress with that. so you obama supporters are just fools in the desert.
the moment that happens, guess what: the ‘official’ popular vote WILL include MI and FL so you shmucks who bring the argument that hillary is using ‘dirty math’ by counting ALL votes, you will be changing you tunes pretty quickly..

Posted by: Average Joe | May 22, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Average Joe expressed 100% the sentiments of me and many others in Louisiana. He is absolutley correct in his assessment of the screaming jackass Dean. And anyone who can spot a fraud knows Obama’s game. How about an Obama/Dean ticket for a loser? I am one disappointed African American.

Posted by: David | May 22, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

MI voter
I think that Obama will be handed the nomination even though the SD’s know he has zero chance of winning the GE.
I believe that Hillary will toe the party line and tell us to unite behind Obama. She has said repeatedly that we must be united in November.
I believe that she will be able to persuade some of her supporters to vote Obama.
I believe that most will not vote Obama because they, as do I, love our country more than the party and could not ever bring ourselves to vote for him.

Posted by: Patty | May 22, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

This is my first time ever blogging
(3 posts) and I think its great that you all care enough to express your opinions. Here is my last one. Count all the votes. Make Hillary the president and FORCE her through the DNC to take Obama for VP. That way she will have what she wants and we will all have what we want- a great TRAINEE for the top spot in 8 years. He is much younger than her and the Dems will control for 16 years. We will keep most of the party together and BO will walk into a great situation when he does become prez- not the screwed up mess we have now. Hill is much more prepared to handle the first shift and straighten out all the crap that presently exists in the government. Then BO will be a “seasoned pro” that will do a great job- and all the experience arguments will be a moot point. Everybody will be happy- not at first- but it would work out beautifully for the dems and the USA in the long run. It is a sensible solution. Barak is just at the beginning of a long and successful career- why rush the deal? I have a different problem than most- I actually LIKE ALL the candidates !! including McCain. Mac blusters too much and forgets- Barak is a passive-agressive con artist – Hill is an up front agressive con artist. Its just the way they are and its OK folks- we are all carrying lots of baggage. They are all strong candidates and all have their faults too. One must admire all 3 of these great public servants. If we could get rid of the DNC and all the stupid rules about apportionment etc we would all look a little more like a true democracy. Go USA Dr Z

Posted by: Dr Z | May 22, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Patty,
I understand what you are saying, but HRC does come with at least one huge negative and that is her likeability rating. Her polls very negative and a floor fight will only raise those numbers. Many Dems do not find her trustworthy and in a GE if 50% or more of your supporters don’t find you truthful, they can easily be swayed by the oppostion.
If you combine that with a floor fight that may divide this even further.
HRC may end up being a candidate with very little support, even among her only supporters.
Jeanne from MI
P.S. Sorry for the typos, it’s only 47 here in MI and I refuse to turn back on the heat, LOL! WTH! It’s almost June. Hope it’s warmer where you are.

Posted by: MI VOTER | May 22, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Average Joe,
You are exactly right. No one can discern WHO exactly the uncommited voter actually voted for. I know my sister voted for Edwards using “uncommited”. But your have to at least apprioriate votes to Obama. I don’t think Biden or Richardson got all that many votes. But at least give Obama something. But HRC’s math give zero to Obama.
Obama did not LOSE Michigan. We have a heavy AA population in Detroit and surrounding areas. I know he would do very, very well here.
Everyone I know is voting for him. Even my Dad, who hasn’t voted Dem since JFK, LOL.
Jeanne

Posted by: MI VOTER | May 22, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Why should ANYONE vote for ANY Democrats who behave/operate this way?????????

Posted by: MikeB | May 22, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

I love, love, love the Obama’s supporters “the rules are the rules” argument. Is that “Change we can belive in?” “The rules are the rules” sounds a lot like old school politics to me. Voters who don’t have a say when the DNC comes down from on high and sanctions their state, should not have their voices silenced. Voters should certainly not have their votes silenced by a screaming lunatic like Dean. To Obama: try to win the general without Florida? You’ve already lost states by big margins to Clinton that are “must wins” for those seeking the presidency, OH, PA, WV, KY. Try losing FL also and see what happens.

Posted by: katherine | May 22, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Patty- I too am from Chicago and my perspective is completely different than yours. I think he has done an admirable job. Funny, how two people can see things differently. I was thrilled when I heard he was running for President. I think he is not only ready but will be a great leader. We will soon find out.

Posted by: gm | May 22, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

katherine wrote:
“The rules are the rules” sounds a lot like old school politics to me.
**********
No, this sounds like what we all learned as children. What are we teaching our children with this? You can play by your own rules if you don’t like how the game is coming out?
It’s simple. You enter a contest based on the rules when the contest starts. Everyone has the same set of rules and all sides agree to them before the game begins. Period.
Jeanne from MI

Posted by: MI VOTER | May 22, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Dr. Z- Thank you for your comments and welcome. I don’t agree with your idea of making Hillary the Pres. and Obama the VP as a training ground. Hillary is older sure, but better qualified? I don’t believe it. The woman is downright abrasive and the polls show people don’t trust her. I don’t believe there is any “job training” that prepares someone for the presidency. I think you either have what it takes or you don’t. Harry Truman, in my opinion, was one of the great presidents. He was only a high school graduate, very little experience, but he had guts, common sense, moral fiber and leadership abilities. I see Obama the same way in the sense that he is a natural born leader. He has proven that over and over. From the campaign he is running to the way he handles controversy and his history of caring for people. I could never vote for another Clinton – no matter what. We don’t need any more needy people in the White House. We need leadership and a new direction.

Posted by: gm | May 22, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Democrats across America are supporting Florida and Michigan voters, democrats across America will be swing voters (for McCain) if they’re delegates aren’t fully accounted for.

Posted by: ramona | May 22, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Democrats across America will be swing voters (for McCain) if their delegates aren’t fully accounted for.

Posted by: ramona | May 22, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I demand that Hillary Clinton
Go Home and take the “lecher-in-chief
with her!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 22, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

First,let’s not forget, FL and MI were not the only states to move up their primaries, other states were not punished (coincidentally they favor Obama) AND FL & MI were punished BEYOND the stated rules of the DNC.
Hillary did COMPLY with the party rules, she did not advocate them. SHE DID NOT ADVOCATE them. When a credible solution was offered (a revote) it was Obama who blocked it.
Finally, regardless of the candidates or the party, NO ONE has the right to tell an American citizen their vote DOES NOT COUNT, (these votes were CERTIFIED).
Doing so is completely at odds with the fundamental principles of a democracy (isn’t that what our soldiers bravely give their lives for?)
All those against this should ask themselves if they think their own votes matter.

Posted by: Ken | May 22, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

See, there’s one little known fact that the nasty/(racist) political commentators keep forgetting about: (Obama’s) need not (to) play by the rules; he can change them whenever it serves his purpose, and there is no limit as to how audacious it may be to the other players or the common sense of the American people…paraphrasing dlp:

Posted by: irma | May 22, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Yeah Obama’s got more delegates but LOOK AT WHY and then tell me he’s going to win the general election. In Iowa he got 2,501 votes and he got 45 delegates. Oh yeah that’s some pretty strong math for counting up the delegates but it won’t be enough for the general election. Caucuses aren’t indicative of what actually happens in the big general election. Wake up fools
That’s why caucuses are less representative of a state’s voting population (i.e., less democratic). Check out the examples below (3 caucus states v. 3 primary states):
…………………______……..Delegates…………Voters
Wyoming (caucus) …12…………………… 8,753
Georgia (primary)…….12……………1,046,485
Hawaii (caucus)………….17………………….37,247
Rhode Island(primary)……18…………184,904
Iowa (caucus)………………..45………………… 2,501
Oklahoma (primary)……….38……………401,230
This democratic voter will vote what is best for this country and that isn’t always Democrat or Repulican. If Hill doesn’t get the nomination then I’m going for the war hero.
Hillary ’08 and then McCain ’08
I will contribute to McCain, I will canvass for McCain, I will call for McCain because that’s how much this racist/sexist campaign has turned me of obama.
.

Posted by: YO | May 22, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Republicans forced this. The DNC preventing the state from voting early has led to the race continued to the end? The rules are dumb and only punishes the voters. There was a record turn out to vote. Obama released an ad thus breaking the rules; so the rules have already been changed.

Posted by: irma | May 22, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

TO MICHIGAN VOTER:
Why do you keep saying that Hillary has “lost the delegate count.” Obama is ahead in delegates but he has not won the number needed for the nomination. What is there about that that you do not understand? Is your brain fogged up because you drank too much Kool-Aid and Obama came out and said in Iowa and stupidly said “I’ve won because I’ve got this number of delegates?” He doesn’t have the number of delegates ne needs period!!!
Neither Obama NOR Clinton have the number of delegates needed to win the nomination and they won’t have them going into the convention in August.
Ted Kennedy didn’t have the delegates he needed and he fought all the way to the convention. Now tell me why Hillary shouldn’t do the same? Maybe it’s because she’s a woman and shouldn’t do the same as a man does. LOL what a bunch of sexist pigs you all are.
That’s why I, along with hundreds of thousands of other women and men (yes, you heard me right-hundreds of thousands of others) will NEVER vote for Obama and will vote for McCain.

Posted by: All for Democracy | May 22, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I live in Michigan and I really am angry at those of you who say my vote should not count. Why yours and not mine? I voted with good conscience just like you and I didn’t break any rules. I think Senator Clinton is giving those of us from Michigan and Florida a much needed voice! Go Hillary! Shame on Obama and his camp…he is just delaying this so that he can win and will then change his mind when it doesn’t matter any more! I wouldn’t vote for Obama if you paid me!

Posted by: Patti | May 22, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

I read yesterday that Obama has been paying superdelegates thousands of dollars to vote for him! He is the crooked dirty player in all of this!

Posted by: Patti | May 22, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Patti what are you talking about? You ask as if Senator Obama walk to the DNC office and ask them not to count Michigan and Flordia’s vote…Take this up with your politicans in your state; they broke the rules not the voters and number two you should know by now we americans do not sell our votes and I am sure the superdelegates are americans too; but I tell you what…for those who wants to vote Senator McCain and go through another four years of President Bush; fine but in end I hope everyone be happy. It is so sad to be living in a time where your qualificatons to be president do not mean a d***thing if you are an africian american….So so so so sas

Posted by: Della | May 22, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Qualifications mean everything to be President. Being African American is not one of them.

Posted by: irma | May 22, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

She’s becoming a joke. She’s going to lose so much respect. No one will ever take her seriously again. We Democrats hate vote-fixing, and manipulative, cheating polticians–who promise one thing, then do a 180 flip-flop and claim it to be the truth. I suspect she has simply become dizzy by her head spinning around so many times. (Please, don’t spout any green pea soup Hillary)

Posted by: Sallie | May 22, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Sandra, I think that many of the super delegates are prepared to lose the “Loony, ranting, person vote” So I am not sure your loony ranting is going to have a big effect on them.

Posted by: Bob | May 22, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Patti,
Florida and Michigan broke the rules of the DNC deliberately and knowingly.
Your primaries were referred to as “Beauty Contests.”
Hillary does not care about either. She cherry picked the larger states only.
Not until she got behind did she start ranting about the popular vote, then it was the most delegates, then it was who is electable, then it was who gets the most middle class white votes, now she is ranting about the sexist media and the women’s votes.
The DNC will handle the Michigan and Florida votes fairly.
Now Bill is pushing for her to be Obama’s running mate. Her disregard of the Democratic party during her entire campaign and total disrespect for her running mate leaves Obama no other choice but to choose someone more creditable to run on the ticket.
Mrs. Obama said in one of her speeches that Obama would not engage in the smears since he doesn’t believe in ruining your challenger because you may have to sit at the table of negotiations with them at one time or the other. Evidently Hillary was not listening.
She can’t be trusted, if she were the V.P. she would make herself president in 3 months through some vicious and malicious means.

Posted by: C. Jenkins | May 22, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I would be very disappointed if Senator Obama were forced to take Hillary as a Vice President.

Posted by: Bob | May 22, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

So, in obama’s dirty talk: “sweetie, i don’t want you to think that I am getting fresh here with you” (don’t you looove that oh-bammer presidential parlance :)), it is your obama boy who does NOT want your MI vote to count at all:
1. Obama removed his name from the MI ballot. Now, now.. why exactly do you think he did that, huh? Here is why you morons who are rooting for him: obama and dear Edwards (that guy, remember – he got a lot of votes in MI) came up with ‘this’ dirty math: they thought that by putting their name under ‘uncommitted’ they will win against Hillary (not the first time they decided to gang up on her!) and that the ‘uncomitted vote will win-therefore, giving them (either one of them!) the reason that they actually won MI. It just turned out that Hillary actually beat all of them put together!
2. Obama actually fought to STOP you from exercising your constitutional right to vote! Actually, if you are a MI obama donor, he took YOUR money and paid lawyers to stop YOU for voting? Like it, right?
3. ZERO votes for obama in MI – he wanted it that way, he got it!

LET DEMOCRACY RUN ITS COURSE!
DO NOT TRY TO STOP THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.
THE ONLY LEGAL WAY TO END THIS ELECTION PROCESS IS AT THE CONVENTION.
NOT ON YOUR TV SET!
STOP THE MEDIA FRAUD!

Posted by: Average Joe | May 22, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Jenkins, you talk rubbish! Don’t pick on candidates regarding FL & MI…go tell DNC and the Republicans, they are the ones at fault here!

Posted by: Wise Ole Woman | May 22, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Popular Vote (w/FL & MI)** Obama 17,254,779 47.5% Clinton 17,422,285 47.9% Clinton +167,506 +0.46%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA*
Obama 17,588,863 47.6% Clinton 17,646,147 47.7% Clinton +57,284 +0.15%

Posted by: longtimechicagodem | May 22, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

I’m not surprised but disappointed that Patti would intentionally throw misinformation out there. So Patti, today a senator from Florida filed a lawsuit against the DNC just hours after having a conversation with Hillary Clinton. Coincidence? I think not! I am so disappointed in Hillary! She is destroying this party! She agreed to the rules and now because they won’t allow her to win she wants them changed! I call that flip-flopping & poor sportsmanship (oops! I sportswomanship :-) I am a middle-aged, white, educated female from the midwest and I DIDN’T vote for Hillary because she is not for the people – she is about herself making history! I would gladly in the beginning have voted for her but as the campaign as moved along she has gotten vindictive, angry, and acting more like a Republican that McCain! Miracles happening, I would grudgingly vote for her in November – not because she’s Hillary, but because I believe in what the rest of the Democratic party stands for (mostly). Hillary has sadly made it so that many of her supporters say they would vote McCain instead of Obama (if she doesn’t get nom) – which tells me they are not for the PARTY but for Hillary! This is not about HILLARY it’s about making America right again! I can only hope they wake up and don’t take her vindictive, poor loser approach! you can’t change the rules that you agreed to months ago to suit your situation!

Posted by: xm167 | May 22, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

xm167 – Right on.

Posted by: gm | May 22, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Seantor Obama is the one that is not acting Presidential:
He should be the one standing up for the people to have their voices heard.
Who the heck wants a president that wants the government rules to be more important than Americans voters.
He is so selfish and inconsiderate and conning all Americans.

Posted by: Rick from Pa | May 23, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am

Senator doesn’t want to have a revote in Florida or Michigan because he lost both states.
There are over 300 delegates that would have to be seated, mostly to Clinton.
He wouldn’t be able to be screaming “I have the most pledged delegates..I am the one with the most delegates”
These states should have been seated at the beginning of this primary. Obama would have been behind the whole time.
He has fought tooth and nail not to have a revote or have them seated.
Do you really want a President that doesn’t stand up for the people but stands up for government rules.

Posted by: Rick from Pa | May 23, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am

Obama knows he would lose if these states had a revote..
There are nearly 400 delegates at stake.
Obama doesn’t care about democracy or the people, he is thinking about Obama.
He should be fighting to have them seated.
Are you people crazy.

Posted by: Al from NJ | May 23, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am

Obama should step down:
He will lose Florida’s support if he doesn’t let them vote and will lose the primary if he does.
He can’t get these group of voters:
Florida and Michigan
The Jewish Voter
White voters
Women Voters
Older Voters
Male white voters
Catholic voters
War hero voters
I don’t think the kids and African Americans are enough.
He is inexperienced and carries the
cross of his pastor
Black Liberation Theology teachings, Muslim father
Friend: Syrian Criminal-Tony Rezko of Chicago
Trinity United Church of Christ: man of the year, anti semitic Nation of Islam leader, Louis Farrakhan
Co worker: domestic terrorist, William Ayers
Just last week one of Obama’s campaign managers was let go because he was speaking to Hamas (New York Times article)
This guy has to step down.

Posted by: Al from NJ | May 23, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am

Al from NJ – I am a white, Catholic, woman. I am 65 years old. My husband is a white male originally from Michigan. We are those people you claim would never vote for Obama but we support Obama all the way! We, and millions of others like us, will prove we are not percentages because of our gender, age, religion or color. We have a mind and we will vote for what is right for our country whi8ch is to beat John McCain in November. Why should Obama drop out…HE IS WINNING! And he will win in November. Forget the media and the percentages….the goal is for the Democrats to win – and Obama is our best shot at the White House.

Posted by: Olivia | May 23, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Bob – I would not only be disapointed if Hillary manipulates things to get on the ticket…I will be OUTRAGED. I would have to rethink if the Democratic party is the best choice.

Posted by: gm | May 23, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

This wreaks as the chad issue & bushes first election….lol
Michigan & Florida voters are U.S.
TAX PAYING CITIZENS AND SHOULD HAVE A SAY IN WHO WE HIRE FOR THIS JOB

Posted by: Pam | May 23, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Noemi from LA wrote:
“Hundreds of years? That I know of, she’s the first woman to run for president. Okay… anyone can be a “monster”–men or women. Annie Oakley??! Did you prefer to use “Indiana Jones” or “GI Joe”?? Glen Close character? So what, let’s argue the racist bid then…? Hasn’t Obama been the target of racism??”
I have a question for you. What planet have you lived on for hundreds of years? There has been many woman that have run for president, look it up. Even a black woman, on the issue of race, most American voting for Obama are proof that we have evolved enough(somewhat) to look beyond that color of a man’s skin and listen to his message with hope for a better USA.

Posted by: Glenn | May 23, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Al from New Jersey:
I think your real name is Ray Larson, the Imperial Wizard KKK…So full of hate.

Posted by: Glenn | May 23, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Hillary is a sore looser. She only wants those states counted because she’s behind, otherwise she could care less. She’s in the should’ve, could’ve , would’ve stage and it’s too late. Not only is it too late but it’s unfair. As someone else mentioned what about the voters who didn’t vote because they knew those states were excluded. In addition both candidates especially Obama weren’t given the chance to properly campaign in those states. Last Obama’s name wasn’t on the Michigan ballots. Putting all other controversy asside counting the votes now would be unconstitutional and unjustifiable. if Hillary was so concerned she would’ve fought for this in the beginning and not only because she’s loosing.

Posted by: fedupwiththeB.S. | May 27, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

If my vote WILL NOT COUNT NOW why should I even bother to vote in November?? Is it our fault that the state had it eariler this year NO, does it make any sence that by March and early April they are already telling us a winner even before all the other states have been able to cast ballots? NO. I do belive this system needs help, and a chage.One thing that is even saddier is that Ron Paul is still in the race, yet NO MEDIA will talk about him why is this? I do belive that all votes should count and all canidates should be heard from untill the end.

Posted by: cleaninfool | May 27, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

I want to start by saying that I feel for the voters of Florida and Michigan. It’s the voters that fall victim to the decisions made by their leadership. However, primary votes not counting is nothing new! I guess since it’s Florida and not New Mexico is what makes it newsworthy. The Republican primary for New Mexico is scheduled for next week – as if they have a choice in who they will vote for. This is the way the primary election works, some states have theirs scheduled for so late that they can’t vote for the candidate of their choice. Florida and Michigan wanted to change their dates so their votes would make a difference. If the states are not allowed to move their primaries how can we then count the votes of the states that have a complete disregard for the rules and want to get a leg up on the primaries and make their vote count MORE than those of their fellow Americans who live in states like New Mexico, who abide by the rules of the system. If they count the votes of Florida and Michigan they are saying “every vote should count – only if it’s in the millions”.
It may not seem fair to the voters of Florida and Michigan, but unfortunately, it’s due to poor leadership in their states. The voters of Florida and Michigan should hold their leaders accountable for the decisions they made which put them in this situation.

Posted by: Voter | May 31, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.