Clinton Greets Puerto Ricans: Buenas Noches!
ABC News’ Eloise Harper reports: "Buenas noches! It is wonderful to be here," Sen. Hillary Clinton said this evening after touching down in Puerto Rico.
Clinton, who doesn’t speak Spanish, greeted the crowd in their language, but then was joined by a translator. Clinton waited for the translator to finish, often times awkwardly smiling and standing there while the woman would speak to the crowd. One third of the way through Clinton continued in English with no further translating from the woman.
The New York senator outlined her plans for the U.S. territory, whose citizens can’t vote in the general election.
"I believe you should have a vote in picking the president, too," she said.
Clinton, whose daughter wasn’t allowed hold a campaign event in Vieques when she was here recently, said "When I am president, the federal government will give up all ownership of land on Vieques not needed for environmental reasons."
Clinton said that one of the principles she will be guided as president is that "all people are entitled to a representative form of government at all levels and Puerto Rico will have the status that a majority of your people want from among all of the options."
"I will work for a resolution of Puerto Rico’s status by the end of my first term as president," said Clinton, who as senator from New York has many constituents who are Puerto Rican. "I will be Puerto Rico’s partner as president and your champion in the White House."
She said that this nominating contest was a potential opportunity for the island.
"This national primary is an opportunity for Puerto Rico. We have the national press here. They are learning about Puerto Rico. We are shining a bright spotlight," she said. "And you know that the more Puerto Ricans who participate, come out and vote, the more important the issues will become, because the press and the public will be looking — do the Puerto Rican people care who is the president."
Clinton, who usually signs off her speeches saying "God Bless America" had a new twist Saturday night, saying, "Thank you. God bless you and God bless Puerto Rico."
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
THE UNTOLD TRUTH ABOUT FLORIDA…!
A large piece of the puzzle is also missing that NO BODY, NONE of her Florida surrogates has Ever Mentioned.
ON JANUARY 29 THE “BIGGEST” Reason why Floridians went to the polls was to vote for a BIG PROPERTY TAX AMENDMENT 1 which would help Florida home owners CUT THERE PROPERTY TAXES etc.
IT WAS A BIG ISSUE HERE IN FLORIDA, Because Property Taxes Was, an still is, the biggest cause of people loosing there homes / going into Foreclosure.
SOME PEOPLE WAS FOR This property tax cut and some people and institutions like the school board district, police, fire fighters and county workers was against the Tax Cut Amendment.
THE ONLY WAY TO SETTLE THIS WAS BY SHOWING UP TO VOTE on January 29!
I REMEMBER THE LOCAL NEWS Constantly Kept reporting that any Florida Votes cast towards the DEMOCRATIC primary WILL NOT COUNT Towards anything because Florida Broke The DNC Rules!
SO ANY DEMOCRAT WHO LIVE IN RENTAL APARTMENTS HAD NO MOTIVATION or REASON to Show Up at the polls to vote!
ANOTHER BIG ISSUE ALSO IS THE FACT THAT “NO BODY” Knew WHO THE HELL Name Sen. Barack Obama, myself included. CLINTON IS BETTER KNOWN ALL OVER FLORIDA and America. Therefore, OBAMA WAS ALREADY AT A BIG Disadvantage from the start! WHILE THEYPEOPLE SHOW-UP TO VOTE FOR or Against cutting Property Taxes, MOST PEOPLE WENT WITH THE BETTER Recognizable Safe Name, CLINTON!!
SO FOR CLINTON TO EVEN SUGGEST THAT THE FLORIDA VOTES WAS FAIR, and done on a level playing field, without Giving Sen. Obama the Chance to Campaign in the state so people could get to know him, is “VERY” disingenuous at best. .
Posted by: Florida Truth | May 24, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
I guess some on this blog are not old enough to remember Kennedy vs. Carter.It went to the floor and after the vote Kennedy lost even after he tried to get pledged del. to vote for him that was in Aug. of 1980 he would not shake carters hand and the party was split and Reagan won.
Posted by: Bishop | May 24, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Can you imagine a president who votes for an unjust war, hires their cronies over competence, blows donor money, is a pathological liar, takes the most money from lobbyists, wants to change the rules to suit themselves, is ridiculed around the world for telling tall tales and is so stubborn that they are willing to destroy their own party and the country to get their way? Yes, that is what Hillary is and would have been like.
Posted by: Barbara | May 24, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
How about a president candidate only foreign policy experience was gained when they were a child of 4 through 10, what does that say about a party electing a so unelectable person.
What about a person who states there are 56 states of America and have two more states to visit.
What about a person that says Good Morning Sunshine, when at the time they are campaigning in Sunrise, Fl. oops.
Posted by: toyouby | May 24, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Hillary will win Puerto Rico and the popular vote for this election.. She will be elected President.
Obama is going down in his popularity and will not be elected President. He is the one with all the baggage.
Posted by: basil | May 24, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
he would do what is right and continue on through the remaining primaries but would not use divisive language and try to change the rules or the perception of the rules in such a way to present that he somehow has a decent chance to still get this.
Posted by: bhrandon | May 24, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
bhrandon
How do you know that?
Posted by: A | May 24, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
because its waht any sensible person in their right mind would do
Posted by: bhrandon | May 24, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
toyouby – Obama mis-spoke and said 57 states, if you’re going to try and trash him at least get your trash correct.
Posted by: D | May 24, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Obama just isn’t ready for prime time yet. Once the democratic convention starts in August the actual pledged votes will be cast. So don’t get so excited Obamaites….. it ain’t over UNTIL IT’S OVER!!
Posted by: Jon | May 24, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Jon
It is over. Our democratic party is no more. Better get used to it.
Posted by: A | May 24, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Obama has been dropping in the polls for weeks. Since the end of February, he’s won only 2 states, NC and OR. In the GE, there are no caucuses. 97% of Obama’s biggest won states were caucuses. This is why his supporters have become so desperate that they are willing to pretend there is ANY democratic reason to scrap the votes of ANYONE in this country, EVER. “Rules?” Don’t you think that’s a dangerous precedent to set in this country? To be the FIRST democratic nation in history to ignore the votes of millions of people because they broke the “party rules?” The FL party would have had to allow an amendment removing a paper trail from votes if they fought the moving of their primary by the REPUBLICAN legislature. And now you want to throw away their votes? Who are you people? Have you ever taken a government class? Do you know what a democracy is? You can’t throw away the votes of people who aren’t willing to support your candidate in a democracy!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Steve in CA | May 24, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
nah the democrats will unite, and obama will beat mccain… some of these people will write in hillarys name, some mccains, some will switch parties, or drop parties…
but that will happen on the other side too..
mccain cant be president he is terrible. I think when it comes down to it people will realize what getting a democrat in office will mean…
obama and hillary are so close on policies, there is virtually no reason if you support her or you support him, why you wouldnt support the other.
Posted by: bhrandon | May 24, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Steve in CA
You can’t throw away the votes of people who aren’t willing to support your candidate in a democracy!!!!!!!!
Sure they can. Since when has the democratic party been a democracy?
Posted by: A | May 24, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
steven you better go check your polls again, hes up…. everywhere… lol
Posted by: bhrandon | May 24, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Keep it up. Some of you Obama supporters continue to drive all the Clinton supporters away, toward sitting out the GE or toward McCain. Don’t you see that?
There are almost 18 million of us who have voted for Sen. Clinton so far, we exist, we matter, and no one can win the GE without us.
Posted by: V in VT | May 24, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Our democratic party has been demolished. Better to vote for Nader than Obama (aka Soetoro). At least he’d shake things up and not just talk about it!
Posted by: A | May 24, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
First off florida and michigan will get seated
and they will punish the delegates of that state. each delegate will probably only count for half a vote.
Secondly, she is counting the vote, and has been for some time.
although she doesnt count ANY votes for obama in michigan, where some voted for him as there was a grass root movement to tell people if htey wanted to vote for obama to vote uncommited.
Several other people withdrew their names as well
for her to give him ZERO of the uncommited and basically win that state 100-0 is crazy talk
it makes no sense…
but dont woryr that wont happen, once again it will be a half vote, hell probably get to count all the uncommiteds towards his popular vote
and even if he doesnt… the popular vote doesnt mean anything
he still has the most delegates, she can not catch up to him.. it is impossible
Posted by: bhrandon | May 24, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
no one is pushing the hillary people away, they push themselves away..
over and over again, you all state you wont vote democrat, or you wont vote for obama, you wouldnt even vote for obama if clinton was on the ticket unless she was on the top…
i find it amazing that anyone would say this…to basically not vote for him because your candidate lost
if hillary wins somehow, like obama gets carried off in a spaceship or something, ill vote for hillary
because mccain would be a terrible president, we cant do another 4 more years of this bush BS
Posted by: bhrandon | May 24, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
In order to secure the nomination, candidates need to earn a certain number of pledged delegates (which will change in some manner after the MI and FL delegates are seated). Those can be pledged or superdelegates, but the supers can’t vote until the end of August at the convention. Neither candidate will have enough purely pledged (primary) delegates before the convention to win the nomination, no matter what the Obama campaign would like us to believe. Naturally, they want us to believe he is the inevitable nominee. That’s what politicians do. However, NO ONE can get enough primary pledged delegates to win in June, and superdelegates can change their votes up until 3 months from now. Three months is a LONG time, of course.
Posted by: Steven Mac | May 24, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Sen. Obama and his supporters are always invoking MLK to suggest that equality has finally come between the two races in the US as indicated by the “white” support for Sen Obama. I agree with MLK’s statement that “one should not be judged by the color of their skin but the contents of their character” . The problem I have with Sen. Obama is that no one is allowed to explore the “contents of his character” since any questions by any one in the public domain is immediately attacked and rejected out right by his surrogates. That is why he is loosing his support among the large majority of the voting public. Public has every right to investigate presidential candidate’s character and they have done so for Sen. McCain and Sen. Hillary but Sen. Obama is out of bounds. It will not last long and Sen. Obama will be totally exposed as an unprepared and ill-suited for the Presidency of this country.
RB
Posted by: rb | May 24, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Omentum – I was thinking the same thing.
Posted by: Ben Straub | May 24, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
I agreed with rb.
Posted by: whatever | May 24, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
“You can’t throw away the votes of people who aren’t willing to support your candidate in a democracy!!!!!!!!”
Did you read the first post in this thread? Florida Truth makes a good case for the voters in Florida who were truly disenfranchised because they were repeatedly told that their votes wouldn’t count. If you didn’t own property there was no reason to GOTV. Was that fair to Florida Truth and the other people that didn’t vote because they were told it wouldn’t count?
Posted by: bailey | May 24, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Obama just isn’t ready for prime time yet.
The Press and DNC are in denial.
Posted by: Jkan | May 24, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
@John: When someone like yourself comes along with common sense, others try and drown you out. It is easier to spew hate and nonsense. In spite of the hot air that gets bandied about here, I’m confident that most people are more like yourself.
Posted by: MIguy | May 24, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
This is so funny!
When Obama said it was 57 States, it was a joke.
Keep in mind. Obama not only went to Harvard Law School, he graduated first in his class…and was the first black editor of the the schools law review.
He has many more accomplishments. Too mant to mention here.
Listen to him talk. Does he seem in-coherent? Why didn’t you get the joke?
Posted by: DakotaXpress | May 25, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
the obamas as angry lol
are we watching the same race here?
Posted by: bhrandon | May 25, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
Can someone tell me why a non-state
is holding a primary and why the
popular vote for that primary will
be counted? They can’t vote for
President in the General Election and
they’re going to be allowed to
influence who the Democrat Party
Nominee is! This is asinine!
I guess this is payback to Bill Clinton’s pardons of FALN terrorists before he left office!
Posted by: reaganfan | May 25, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
bhrandon….i think we are…and you need to see how angry michelle is. view the tapes yourself sir. we don’t need prejudice in the WH… we need hillary clinton..
Posted by: carlasue | May 25, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
staniam, carlasue, I can only encourage you at this stage to press on to the end, because if you have not got it by now, the chances are indeed rare that you will ever do. Just you don’t damn us all to hell when you don’t get your way in the end.
Posted by: TK | May 25, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
tk, this is not about getting our way. this is about the presidency of the united states of america sir. as i have said in earlier posts, i would support obama if hillary didn’t get the nom, but now the creeps that he has associated with, lived with, mentored with, and is married to are so full of hate and anger….it makes me afraid. no sir, i won’t vote for mc’cant.
Posted by: carlasue | May 25, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
carlasue, I am glad to hear that; ‘be nice too if you helped convince others.
Posted by: TK | May 25, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
It’s over Hillary. Please stop manipulating numbers, words, ideas, facts, and history. It’s over for you, Buenas Noches.
Posted by: bob10001 | May 25, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
tk, thanks, we need to stand together to make sure mc’can’t doesn’t get into office. just think….4 more years of bush. BS!!! i won’t stand for it. but i want to make sure that obama stands for peace and solidarity and against racism, bigorty and anger. i hope you understand.
Posted by: carlasue | May 25, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Surely you jest re: baggage — or were born yesterday.
Hillary has tons, heaps, and miles of baggage (and I don’t mean “just-Bill” issues).
It just hasn’t been discussed during the primary, due to a tacit Dem Party rule: One doesn’t raise these issues, since they reflect badly on the party, on the Clintons-as-Dem.-celebrities, and on the last Democratic presidency.
But the GOP has been salivating at the chance to air the dirty laundry, and would do so with great skill. It would hit voters like a ton of bricks – since none of it has been mentioned during the Dem primaries.
In addition:
– To recapture all of those “blue collars,” the GOP need only expose Hill’s recent “just folks” stance as a con job – completely at odds with her previous identity, voting record, and VERY aggressive vote-seeking among ‘way-liberal interest groups.
– They’d also drag in Bill’s probable W.H. role, his iffy lobbying, past use of the W.H. as a “cash cow,” and whether Hill’s job would just be a setup for Bill’s future business interests (and not necessarily in the U.S.’s interest).
He’d be fair game, since she owes her candidacy to his influence, and he’s been 90% of her campaign. If she viewed her past spousal role as a “co-presidency,” why wouldn’t he?
– And that’s before questioning her leadership temperament — i.e., whether voters can trust someone who misspeaks so regularly, reneges on agreements, has divided her own party, alters her identity at will, wreaks havoc rather than unifying, gets unhinged when stressed (as with her Zimbabwe and RFK comments), and attributes any criticism to far-left, far-right, sexist, and media conspiracies.
The GOP’s attacks would be EXCEEDINGLY effective, and educational — especially to Democrats, who (to date) have been focused only on Obama’s gaffes, and allowed Hillary to cherrypick her own history.
Posted by: alania | May 25, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
toyouby wrote: “How about a president candidate only foreign policy experience was gained when they were a child of 4 through 10 … What about a person who states there are 56 states” etc.
How about a candidate who never held any elective office at all until age 52, had no previous policy role, was effectively unemployed for 20 years (FYI: state/U.S. “first lady” isn’t a defined job), is running on her spouse’s record, and – without his clout – would have no Senate post, no chance at primaries, and no campaign?
And her “misspeaks” haven’t just been the occasional campaign-roadshow faux pas; they’ve been lies or substantive cases of foot-in-mouth.
[It didn't help for Bill to blame her sniper lie on "tiredness" - right after she ran the 3-am-phone ad. And when most of us think of Ted Kennedy, we don't immediately think about how RFK's assassination altered Dem-Party logistics.]
As for 56 states: It’s not a major goof (and wouldn’t be if Hillary said it, either).
Reason: Votes/delegates also come from NON-states – Virgin Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the military, and nonmilitary Americans abroad. Therefore, candidates don’t just think in terms of “50.”
Posted by: alania | May 25, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
Let’s be clear:
The primary election was to find out what candidate won more delegates
…period.
Then comes the intelligence and the strategy on how to get those delegates.
It was not about number of votes: otherwise both Obama and Clinton would have had a different strategy.
The Obama camp was more intelligent and more strategic and better prepared.
If the idea would have been to get more votes, the Obama camp would have developed a different strategy. And they would have won because they are better organizers, better economists, and better strategists.
Clinton camp has shown a lack of strategy, economical incompetence, and lack of intelligence.
Like it or not…the truth is the truth.
Posted by: veteran for truth | May 25, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am
Hillary is finished. She is campaigning to spoil Obama’s chance at the general election.
The clintons are immoral human beings.
Posted by: spiky | May 25, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am
spiky, hi, but i must disagree with you sir. the clintons are not perfect, as neither you or i are, but they are not immoral. obama’s creeps are crawling out from under their rocks. talk about spoiling obama’s chances. he has his associates to thank for that sir. and what is the latest on rattso…have you heard…i haven’t..just waiting to hear.
Posted by: carlasue | May 25, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am
Anne:
The George Bush / John McCain policy of ‘TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS’ assumes that when corporations profit, this profit will trickle down to the workers who created it. When the company does well, the employee will share in the rewards.
This year, oil companies are making record profits, retail prices are increasing at what appears to be daily, and the dollars coming out of your pocket for food is skyrocketing. This is money coming FROM the average consumer TO the corporations.
If Bush / McCain’s “trickle down economics” were working, shouldn’t some of these dollars be trickling into the employee’s paycheck? Shouldn’t the average American be seeing their income at least appearing to keep pace with the real cost of living?
So tell me, over the past seven years, at what rate did your employer increase your paycheck? 3% per year? 1% per year? Less? Or did the company you worked for ship your job overseas?
It would be a lot easier to swallow the economic policies of John McCain / George Bush if my income was keeping pace with the costs I must burden to live.
All through this campaign, Obama has offered hope to the middle class and poor. He has offered strategies to provide quality education to average families. Provide tax relief to middle and lower income households, and increase the proportion that the most wealthy contribute.
Of course, Rush Limbaugh is in this latter group. His annual income far exceeds the average wage earner’s. McCain’s economics favor the wealthy, so of course Rush Limbaugh would want to protect his wealth and try to distort Obama.
Posted by: Alfred | May 25, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am
v in vermont – I don’t think you can blame Obama supporters for “driving away” Clinton supporters from voting for Obama if he gets the nomination. Not any more than the reverse. We are all responsible for our actions and need to take responsibility for the votes we cast no matter what the opposition says or does. The bottom line is if McCain is elected because either Obama supporters or Clinton supporters defect out of anger because their candidate of choice didn’t get the nomination, the country will be headed in a very different direction than if either democrat is elected. The Supreme Court is at stake. Our economy is at stake and the Iraq war is not only killing our kids but also has a HUGE and direct effect on our economy. We are spending literally billions of dollars each and every month on the war. Our country would not be in the miserable shape it is if not for the war. Separation of church and state is at stake. We can’t use being ticked off that our candidate didn’t get the nomination as an excuse for either voting for McCain or staying home on election day. This is not only a really stupid thing to do, it’s a juvenile way of behaving and will affect our future in a way that is so incredibly bad. We need to get a democrat in office. period. As far as I’m concerned, at this point I don’t care who it is as long as she/he is a democrat. All the arguments one poses for or against Clinton and Obama are now moot. Clinton this, Clinton that, Obama this, Obama that – it’s all b.s. We need to get a democrat in office to end the insanity of the past eight years under republican rule. And, folks, McCain IS a republican.
Posted by: counting crows | May 25, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
bhrandon…halo there; it is me again, long time no see :-)
How is that the “presumptive” nominee BHO is fairly so badly in the lastest Newsweek survey ?
“In a new NEWSWEEK Poll of registered voters, Obama trails presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain 40 percent to 52 percent among whites. Sen. Hillary Clinton, Obama’s challenger for the Democratic nomination, also trails McCain among white voters but by a smaller margin, 44 percent to 48 percent.
Among voters overall, however, Obama fares better, tying McCain 46 percent to 46 percent in a hypothetical match-up. (That’s down slightly, within the margin of error, from the last NEWSWEEK Poll, conducted in late April, in which Obama led McCain 47 percent to 44 percent).
Clinton fares slightly better against McCain: 48 percent to 44 percent (within the margin of error).
Are the DNC and SDs losing sleep over their baby BHO ?
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
These posts about polls at this point are irrelevant for the general election, otherwise we would be talking about President Kerry’s second term now.
Ultimately, it’s whoever shows up to vote that matters. Clearly Obama & Clinton have a large fan base. McCain is kinda milktoast now and spurning his pseudobase of evangelicals. It’s the GOP who have the big problem right now. Although I like McCain’s recent remembrance of his moderate views, if the GOP base doesn’t come out and vote he will lose.
Posted by: MIguy | May 25, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Ok….from all the posts I have seen on “RFK” thing… the bloggers are convinced HRC is a racist/muderer, BHO is a sexist/liar. Lets have them on a joint ticket this fall to tap their fan base, it the only chance against McCain
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
I love it when someone has a problem …but if you were to ask me : HRC is still safer bet for the DEMS
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
The fact is that campaign manager David Plouffe has orchestrated a fantastic campaign …but the truth is going to be hard for the DEMS to swallow according to the polls…BHO is still not ready for prime time. HRC is still a safer bet at a time when the DEMS are split right down the middle.
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Obama, Axelrod, and Plouffe are in for a VERY rude awakening. With a free ride from the media, Hillary making her own mistakes, and the complicated DNC rules, the Obama campaign has been successful. But guess what? We are still a center-right country, the same country that elected Bush for TWO terms. Those 62 million voters haven’t gone anywhere. And Hillary supporters? There are almost 18 million of us and we are mad as hell!!! Obama has done nothing to bring us into the fold. All his people do is insist that we’ll be a “united party”. Well, go ahead and make all the assumptions you want. You’ll find out in November just how angry we are.
“President McCain”. GET USED TO IT!
McCain ’08/Hillary ’12
Posted by: soneil00 | May 25, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Hope she runs as an independent. Never have I seen such unloyal folks or fairweather friends bow to the $$ of the liberal elites of the dems.
So after each major Obama endorsement she doesn’t get knocked out. After being out spent 3:1 in the last several primaries she has gone toe to toe.
She should pull in a moderate Rep as VP and run.
The pundits want to facilitate this race for a democratic man.
Posted by: rwatt | May 25, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
How do you HRC supporters keep saying she will be elected president? I work with young students with learning disabilities that can do math better than you.Let it go! Or are you thinking about 1968?…….
Posted by: bskahn | May 25, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
I can see why Dukakis, AL Gore and Kerry headed the way they did…
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
57 states of denials ….oops…well if you add FL and MI, it is actually 59…with Puerto Rico, it is 60
United States of America !
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
It’s amazing to me that some “Clinton” supporters make statements such as “….if Obama steals the election or “…Clinton is ahead in the popular vote” or “….. Obama is not playing by the rules”. You guys are as transparent as can be – Senator Obama is winning this election cycle by running a better campaign and not breaking the rules. Your candidate is losing – LOSING!!!! Her plan for victory rests on one thing – CHANGE THE RULES JUST FOR HER. Does that sound familiar to anyone else – Bushish kind of? Why would you support that? Think of the lessons you are teaching your children.
Posted by: Rob | May 25, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
I mean cannot wait till then…seriously
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
There is a very well written article in Newsweek …one of the para that will define this election is this one :
“The good news is that you have all but won the nomination. The bad news, if we are willing to face reality, is that the country—some parts of it, anyway—may not be ready to elect a black president of the United States. It is hard to get a precise fix on the problem. Voters generally deny to pollsters that race is a factor in casting their votes, but when they step into the privacy of the polling booth, their prejudices can sometimes emerge. Probably only a tiny fraction of voters are outright racist. But race is not irrelevant to many others, black or white; exit polls vary greatly by state, but show that 10 to 30 percent of primary voters considered race as they voted (if white, those voters broke overwhelmingly for Hillary Clinton; if African-American, they voted for you).”
Now..that is a dose of reality
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Pathetic!
Pathetic are the Obama sheep that are on here claiming that McCain is the same as Bush.
Those of you sheep that spew that are idiots. You have never once looked at McCain’s stand on the issues. It proves your ignorance, no, flat out stupidity about this election. You are giong to try and paint McCain the same as Bush just to use fear to get your party in the whitehouse.
Stupidity such as these Obama sheep should not be allowed to vote. They have got to be the dumbest idiots to have ever taken a breath.
Misinformation and lies – the liberal way to Utopia.
Posted by: jpt | May 25, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
now for those who would prefer to stay away from the RACE thing …here’s another dose of reality :
“Your mission is to not wind up like Kerry, who ended up losing the rural vote by 20 points. The “reality,” writes Davis, “is that when Democratic candidates run competitively in rural America, they win national elections. And when they get creamed in rural America, they lose.”
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Amen to that.
“There are almost 18 million of us who have voted for Sen. Clinton so far, we exist, we matter, and no one can win the GE without us.”
Posted by: 57 states and counting | May 25, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
There is a backlash starting against Obama so hang in there Hillary supporters. We call Obama the great Divider and if Hillary is not the nominee he will never become president.The Republicans will win hands down. He has made life long democrats pledge their support for Mccain what does that tell you.
Posted by: mimi362 | May 25, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
mimi362,
You can create your own reality, and the rest of us are free to laugh hysterically at it.
One thing we know about Hillary is,
As a pre-emptive attack, she accuses her adversary of having her *own* major weaknesses.
Since her experience was shaky, she carped re Obama’s “inexperience.”
After Bill’s SC comments were tagged as racist, Hillary’s campaign leveled racism accusations at Obama.
She’s been disloyal to her party and voter subgroups, so her campaign accuses ex-supporters of being Judases.
She’s wealthy and relies on large donors and lobbyists, so she ‘poor-mouthed’ as if Obama were Richie Richguy.
She’s a privileged Ivy grad, so accused Obama of elitism.
She wants to change rules and dodge the 4-state agreement she signed, so her supporters are accusing Obama of theft.
She’s now perceived as more divisive than a cross-cut saw, so she’s trying to spin Obama as divisive.
If she accused Obama of jaywalking, I’d know that Hillary herself must have just gotten a jaywalking summons.
Her campaign determines what Hillary’s biggest liability is, and then tries to tag Obama with it.
It’s so obvious that it’s b-o-r-i-n-g.
Posted by: mansell21 | May 25, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Also, don’t blame Obama for making “life long democrats pledge their support for Mccain.” How dumb do you think we are?
It *does* tell me something when alleged women, feminists, and loyal Democrats. who supposedly back Hillary’s platform, are willing to
continue the Iraq war,
compromise women’s rights,
jeopardize Choice,
enable the GOP to pack the fed courts,
throw health insurance out the window,
continue NAFTA and the Bush economy,
add to ‘hardworking people’s’ burdens. totally chuck Hillary’s platform, and
throw all Democratic values right out the window.
It tells me that these people are clueless, didn’t care about civil rights, justice, women, and people’s lives anyway, are Republican, belong to a personality cult, are under the mental age of 12, or are so dumb that they’ll shoot *themselves* and call it revenge.
Posted by: mansell21 | May 25, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Florida Truth-
I have read about this, I really don’t understand why the Obama campaign doesn’t speak about it publicly to lay to rest the constant
“OBAMA IS DISENFRANCHISING FLORIDA” crap.
It wasn’t an election, everyone in Fla knew it wouldn’t count. Of course, at the time, everyone assumed Hillary would win, so they didn’t care.
I think the DNC will not alienate the REST OF THE COUNTRY by ignoring the rules and fully seating an election that was inarguably VOID.
Posted by: Gina | May 25, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
basil: You’re living in a dream world!
Hillary Clinton needs to learn the
meaning of the spanish word Adios!
Good Bye!
Posted by: reaganfan | May 26, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Well the Puerto Ricans are saying Hola to Hillary with their votes.
Posted by: irma | May 26, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm