By Nitya

May 7, 2008 2:48pm

Clinton Says She’s ‘Staying in This Race’

ABC News’ Eloise Harper Reports: With her sights set on the May 13 West Virginia primary, Senator Clinton made no mention of her loss in North Carolina – and spoke proudly of her Indiana finish describing it as a "come-from-behind-victory".

Speaking in Shepherdstown, West Virginia, when asked if she’ll carry the fight to the floor of the convention, Clinton said she’s not going anywhere until there is a clear winner. "I’m staying in this race until there is a nominee and I obviously am going to work as hard as I can to become that nominee…that is what I have done, that is what I continue to do," Clinton said.

Watch the
VIDEO HERE.

Clinton once again floated 2210 delegates as the nomination finish line, accounting for the seating of Michigan and Florida’s delegates. Both states were punished by the DNC for holding early primaries and are not included in the needed 2025 delegates to clinch the nomination.

When asked if she would accept Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill, as the party’s nominee if he got to 2210 delegates, Clinton praised the reporter for using the 2210 instead of 2025 calling it "the right figure".

"I’m glad you used the figure 2210 because I think that’s the right figure because that includes the seating of delegates from Florida and Michigan something that I have said consistently as I have said consistently for months now,’ Clinton concluded, not answering the question adding "2209, 2210 is the number and at one point one of us will get there."

With roughly 18 delegates (of the 187 that were at stake Tuesday) left to be allocated, Sen. Obama is 182 delegates shy of reaching the magic number 2,025 to secure the nomination.  Sen. Clinton is 346 delegates away — that is roughly 70% of the total remaining pledged and unpledged (super) delegates left to be allocated.

Clinton did not show frustration when asked how she felt about losing the endorsement of former Sen. George McGovern, "I respect him. He has a right to make whatever decision he makes I was pleased to get Heath Shuler’s endorsement."

Clinton refused to answer when asked if she would loan more money to campaign — this morning ABC News learned the New York senator had loaned her campaign nearly $6.5 million in the last month. Clinton said today that she thought he investment had paid off.

"It’s a sign of my commitment to this campaign. It’s a sign of how much I believe in what were trying to do and my supporters have been incredibly generous. They are putting money into this campaign on an hourly basis."  Clinton continued, "We’ve remained competitive and I have been willing to lend that money to my campaign so that we could be competitive and I think it’s paid off."

Clinton emphasized her strength in the race to the nomination, "I think the base that I have put together in these primaries is a stronger base to stand on, that is certainly my assessment as I stand here today.” Clinton continued to speak about how the length of the race is not unusual saying "In June of 1992 that’s when Bill really wrapped up the nomination – the middle of June after California."

Clinton then made a veiled comparison between Kerry and Obama saying "When Senator Kerry wrapped up the nomination in I guess March, he was ahead of President Bush but he didn’t win so this is a dynamic electoral environment."

Clinton also pointed out that if the other side had the rules the Democratic Party did – their contest would still be raging on. "If we had the rules the Republicans have we’d already have a nominee. If they had our rules they’d still be fighting it out."

User Comments

That’s the kind of fighter we need.

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 7, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Hills say – “If we had the rules the Republicans have we’d already have a nominee. If they had our rules they’d still be fighting it out.”
Ya, riiiight. If Hillary could just change the rules to benefit her she’d be WINNING!

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 7, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Before people start bashing her, please realize that she has to say this – even if it is over. The classy thing to do will be to let her choose the moment to concede. I know some on here don’t want her to concede ever, but it is political suicide for her at a certain point if she continues. They are not doing her a favor by letting her jump off that cliff.

Posted by: MIguy | May 7, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

It’s just sad how someone can keep fooling herself and others. It’s time to show piety to her followers. They need all the help they can get.

Posted by: The Unshrub | May 7, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I can’t wait to see the Clintons Campaigning around the country for Obama.
They and Ed Rendell better deliver Penna.
hahahahahaha

Posted by: Jack | May 7, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Emily – You’re joking riiiight?
Hillary lost because the other dood won more states and delegates.
The other dood had a plan and the executive and organizational ability to make it happen.
And the other dood was a newbie politician with a name that rhymes with osama. He beat Hills when she had all the advantages.
It’s like the Hillary Fans are saying Obama cheated by getting more votes.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 7, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

@Emily: You are of course welcome to your opinion, and McCain is a decent guy, but seriously if the Supreme Court is something you are thinking about then please realize that both Senators Clinton and Obama would likely choose from the same pool of candidates. Senator McCain will choose a much more conservative justice, in all likelihood.
You also speak about Senator Obama having no “integrity, experience, and honor”. That’s pretty tough and more than I think Senator Clinton would ever say.

Posted by: MIguy | May 7, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Obama’s racially lopsided victory in North Carolina just goes to prove he can never win the general election. Obama’s victory there was tempered by the fact that Clinton beat him handily among white voters. This lopsided, unbalanced result should clearly make the super delegates see that Obama will lose in November. This is a racial election, and no one is saying who is best for the tough job ahead.

Posted by: Anne | May 7, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

@Emily: you are joking right. Have you ever checked up on HIllary and her background. The media has been extremely gracious to her. If she ran against McCain you would see her best side, or should I say worst. It is probably good that Obama is our choice because I do not think you want to hear or see the truth.

Posted by: Becky | May 7, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Hillary is going all the way to the convention and her supporters will never surrender our country to a black supremacist group that hates America and whites.
We would rather vote for a patriotic conservative like John McCain than to surrender our country to radical hate groups.
Hillary or McCain!

Posted by: Manolete | May 7, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Ted Kennedy said to day, I pay tribute to Senator Clinton. She has been making her case and doing it effectively, but the outcome is very clear as to what’s for the Democratic nomination. It’s effectively Barack Obama’s nomination. It’s pretty effectively sewed up and I don’t see any possibility of altering or changing that inevitable fact,” Kennedy said. So says Ted Kennedy today, but he didn’t say this when HIS brother came from no where to sew up the convention in the early 60’s. That is because the democratic people in charge could see that Kennedy could win in all states and the nominee could not. This is clearly not the case with Obama. Just his recent lopsided victory win in North Carolina just goes to prove he can never win the general election. Obama’s victory there was tempered by the fact that Clinton beat him handily among white voters. Obama took only the black vote and this state was not a factor in any decision making as this is the state with the most registered black democrats. If Obama had won the “sister” state of Indiana where he was ahead up until the Primary, this might have been a different story. Obama will take the Democratic Party down with him. Ted Kennedy knows this

Posted by: Anne | May 7, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I really don’t see Hillary winning the Presidency without African-American votes.
Blacks are not going to vote for her if it looks like she has “stolen” the election from Obama.

Posted by: Stacey | May 7, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

It’s all over except for Hillary’s crying. She’s finished.

Posted by: Steven Wilson | May 7, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Hillary Clinton should continue considering she is perceived by voters as a fighter for rural, working class-blue collar- Democrats and older voters.
Barack Obama will also have the next primaries as a chance to attract the same key voters now, instead of waiting after the convention, if he is the Nominee.

Posted by: Angel | May 7, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

She loans herself money… that means actually buying herself into the White House. Scary.

Posted by: robin good | May 7, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Well if it’s pretty effectively sewed up and no one can’t see any possibility of altering or changing that inevitable fact, let Hillary run her race.
It’s her call to say when its over, not Obama’s , his supporters, the media or anyone else.

Posted by: SJ | May 7, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

No what is going on is the DNC feel that people are so dumb especially white people that no matter what they will sell their soul, hold their nose and vote Obama in Nov for the love of the party.
Right wait and see !!!

Posted by: SJ | May 7, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

I am not worried about Wright. he is holed up in his rich white gated community until Obama needs to play the race card again.

Posted by: geevill | May 7, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Don’t count on money from those college kids. Wait until their parent’s credit card statements come in.

Posted by: geevill | May 7, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

I have been going back and forth between Obama and Clinton MANY times and now I am staying with Clinton. They both have been dishonest in different ways–whether “stetching the truth” is permissable in politics is another story. However, if you want a Democratic president, Clinton is better prepared to beat John McCain (and the Republicans know it). The best option would be for Obama to cut a deal with Al Gore and the super delegates allocate their votes to Gore. A Gore-Obama ticket is a sure win! But that will never happen. The Democrats had an opportunity a year ago–now it seems that McCain will win and can position himself as a different type of Republican.

Posted by: Don V | May 7, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Dont count on money for the DNC from the AA for Obama either, they will send money to Obama yes but sending money to the DNC is another story.

Posted by: SJ | May 7, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Vanessa: Obama does not lead in the popular vote when Michigan and Florida are included…that’s the point! He won in caucuses which represents only a limited batch of potential voters, not those who have to work, care for kids, can’t drive themselves, or stay out until all hours as those who can do so drag it out.
It’s really a different kind of engagement. In the states which are likely to vote GOP, those caucuses don’t carry much real weight at all. This is something the unpledged delegates are supposed to take into consideration. Since most of the public seems to be unaware of their role, haven’t bothered to find out, and haven’t been clued in by the media they don’t understand what’s going on.
When it comes to seating the delegates from Florida and Michigan, the party really has to or they risk alienating the voters in those states. The voters were not responsible for this mess and, particularly in Florida, where they’ve been seriously disenfranchised by the GOP in the recent past, it would be “twisting the knife” for the Democratic Party to do the same.
Clinton did not campaign in either state. Obama did air TV commercials in Florida which was against the party’s rules. He took his name off the Michigan ballot and has admitted that was an error as it was not required by the Democratic party. Neither campaigned in Michigan, by the way.
Going 50/50 on the votes cast there won’t work as it effectively changes the vote, i.e., is another way of disenfranchising the voters yet again. Voters in Michigan were told to vote for “other” if they were voting for Obama…those are his votes, and it’s quite fair as he removed his name. As well run as his campaign may have been when it came to caucuses, it did make some errors and has to be responsible for those as well as for their successes.
It all makes sense, if you play it fairly.

Posted by: Mary | May 7, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Obama won NC with big margin because 91% AA voted for him.
This not the real election.
Why don’t we have 2 presidents.
One for AA and the other one for the whole nation.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

There is nothing ABC news can do to stop Sen. Clinton from becoming President. About three years ago a well known televangelist, Perry Stone Jr., told his congregation that God spoke to him and said Sen. Clinton will be the next President. This information can be obtained from one of his published works on CD entitled “Strange Patterns of Recent American Presidents.” On track 7 of this CD, he tells us that Sen. Clinton will once again be in the White House. So give it up ABC News. And Barack, your days are numbered.

Posted by: brianerickson65 | May 7, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

I am with Hillary all the way. Her speech last night was amazing. What a woman, what a fighter!! We need Hillary in the White House. Go Hillary Go!!!!

Posted by: andrea | May 7, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

If DNC abandon Hillary and say she is the same ticket with Obama.
Don’t expect me to vote for him.
Hillary don’t let DNC use you to get your supporters to vote for him.
We will not!

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

@Emily: Not trying to antagonize you, but you seem to feel otherwise. And I’m not speaking for Senator Clinton; I’m only going by what she has consistently said herself, including her speech last night.

Posted by: MIguy | May 7, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Doe Obama really win? No, here is why:
In TX, Obama won caucus by 10% but lost primary by 4%.
In WA, Obama won caucus by 37% but only won primary vote by 5%.
So, if you convert all caucuses to primaries, then Obama should have been gone a long time ago.
But, maybe the Obama-cult can change the GE to caucus. Yes, you can???

Posted by: A fighter | May 7, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

How many of these new rush of voters that Dean keeps speaking about, these young kids that signed up to the party just to vote for Obama, and all others who never even cared one hoot about any election before, are they now going to work for the DNC?
Are the young ones going to take their time and effort to push the DNC on college campuses, are they going to work night and day to keep the party going after the election?
A party is just not made viable for a presidential election and then toss aside until the next one comes around, it will need activist, workers, able bodies to keep the thing going.
All these new found interest in the DNC because of Obama what will happen if he does not win, will they keep fighting working, building for the next round?
I will bet anything when this is over the majority of them will not have the time, that is why so many that have spent years working for this party and now feel slighted will never accept Obama and what is being done to this party, that is why there is a major split now, so who wants to think its trivial and will blow over once Obama is chosen better think again.

Posted by: SJ | May 7, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

2210 now? Pretty soon it’s going to be 3000, and then when no one gets it, she’s going to stay in the race and say no one has won yet.

Posted by: Jane | May 7, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

If Hillary is forced out and this is a close race how do you think it makes her supporters feel or is that you really don’t think you need white blue collar workers.take this to the bank Tim ,Chris, Andrea, Keith and are all for McCain that is a fact do you really think life time republicans have changed there minds.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

heythere: that’s because many one-day-demo-forever-rep. voted for him to push Clinton out of race. yes, it is that simple.

Posted by: A Fighter | May 7, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Stick a fork in Hillary, shes done. Theres no chance now for her, she should just be a good person and quit. She can always run next time, if she gets out now, with some dignity!

Posted by: mitch | May 7, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

heythere,
The key states are OH, FL, PA, etc…
Obama can’t win red states because of race issue, which has offended some whites…

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Turner must be one of those that just signed up and became a democrat just to vote for Obama, bet he has never sent one penny to the DNC in his life and will never if Obama does not win.

Posted by: SJ | May 7, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

As you hear it is 2209 delegates and no one has those yet. The process must continue. Hillary does have a chance. Obama is a tainted candidate because of his associations, his poor judgement, his lack of experience, and his constant lies. The man wouldn’t even know how to govern Kankakee.

Posted by: Luis | May 7, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Obama won the nomination fair and square. He deserves it. Hillary trusted her idiot team and they let her down. She is ultimately to blame for it. But lets not forget how GREAT a campaign Axelrod and Burton ran for Obama.
Why did this take so long ? Because Obama is a flawed candidate. He very well ran a better campaign, but he is NOT the better candidate.
Hillary clinton is the better candidate.
So you had a situation where one is the better candidate, and the other has more charisma and ran a superior campaign.
So one is saying Hillary should be the nominee because she is the better leader for America.
The other is saying Obama is winning the nomination process so he should.
In the end, the way you choose the nominee is the campaign process, which Obama won.
So lets not rain on his parade.
Lets rally around Obama.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 7, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Fighter
People love caucuses. They Rock!
Hillary lost the caucuses because she was unprepared to compete in them.
I guess you could say she was not ready on DAY ONE, here.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 7, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Emily, Please try to understand. You say you can live with Mccain, but you are worried about what kind of person Obama would put on the Supreme Court? Well I can tell you this..whomever it is will be a liberal and will protect womens rights, and whomever Mccain appoints will be a conservative and will take your rights away, but you decide for yourself who you “trust”.

Posted by: JJ | May 7, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I wonder if Hillary decided to run as Independant , you guys can not stop her and wait what will happen.
We will support her.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

A fighter: The fact that Obama won more caucus elections than Clinton is very important. In primaries, voters just fill in the blank, or circle a candidate. In caucuses, people give speeches, debate, and have discussions (like in a town hall meeting) decide who the best candidate is. Everytime people get together to actually talk and discuss the issues and which candidate would be best-they choose Obama.

Posted by: Justme | May 7, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

bishop? forced out? you mean as in pushed? OR as in the numbers don’t lie and she can’t win?
Leave it to hillary to keep trying to change the rules. Now she’s working with 2209 instead of 2024. Pitiful.
Let me see….did she come up with these numbers on her own, did bill revise the math, OR did the DNC tell the candidates that now the nomination numbers have changed?

Posted by: LA in Indiana | May 7, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

I would rather trust McCain if Hillary’s gone.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Bishop — I think you have the wrong network.
Second, I think we all need to get used to the fact of President McCain.
This is coming from a diehard liberal, but I realize that swing states are not going to go for Obama.
Even the national polls show it, atm.

Posted by: Ethan | May 7, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Again , there are 2 valid arguments.
The Obama supporters keep looking at the math.
The Clinton supporters keep looking at who the better nominee is.
They are both right.
The bottom line is that Obama ran a better campaign, and he should be the nominee.
If they want the best person for the white house, they should build that into the rules. They dont.
The rules clearly state that the guy who runs the best campaign and gets the most delegates wins.
Obama did that.
Lets move on and rally around Obama.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 7, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

I think the Democratic party has suffered considerably, and no matter what the analyst say, I don’t see it mending before the GE. It really doesn’t matter if Hillary or Obama is the nominee, the GOP has this one in the bag. Like all of you, I don’t want 4 more years of Bush, and I won’t vote for McCain, but the writing is on the wall for the Dems. Hillary will stay in the race until the convention (causing more dissension), and Obama will continue to have to defend himself on Wright, Ayers, Rezko, and as one analyst said last night, its just a matter of time before Wright and who knows what else, will show up and cause more pain for Obama.

Posted by: david from texas | May 7, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

awwww blue irish, I’m sorry you’re feeling kinda blue.
So let me get this straight….African Americans have been voting for white men all their lives….and the first time an African American candidate comes along that inspires people with a positive message (because we have had African American candidates before), voting for him somehow makes them racist? Hmmmmmm…..that statement just jumped out there with no real thought behind it huh?!

Posted by: LA in Indiana | May 7, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

It really bothers me that in the GE, if Obama is the nominee, he will not carry Florida and Michigan. Two HUGE swing states that will definitely go to McCain. What else bothers me is that if Hillary runs as an Independent, that will be a spoiler for the Dems. It’s beginning to look like a “win-win” situation for McCain….ugh!

Posted by: david from texas | May 7, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Obama is the weaker candidate. However, the dems feel that the election is so tilted in their favor in this cycle that Obama will win anyways.
If Mc Cain simply ditches the republican platform and creates a NEW republican party of new ideas and change, he can minimize many of Obama’s talking points.
If the election is about issues and Mc Cain stands on the normal Republican platform, Obama will win.
If Mc Cain simply copies most of Obamas platform, and makes it about character, obama will get CRUSHED.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 7, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Some here say that this a racist primary but what about sexist. How many white male Obama voters do you think voted for him because they were sexist and wanted to show up the uppity female?

Posted by: bruce | May 7, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

How many Clinton supporters out there would vote for her in November if she ran as an independent? If you would, let her know. I’d much rather do that than vote for McCain. Of course, I’ll vote for McCain if my only other choice is the beast Obama.

Posted by: Griffin | May 7, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

One interesting thing: why will people here worry about Dems party? Has Dems done good things to you personally?? Do you think Dem won’t have a war with Iraq or Iran?? Don’t think there won’t be a good Rep President? Do you think Dems can really improve economy based on their proposals? The difference between Reps and Dems is who will be benefited. For middle/upper-class people, it doesn’t matter who will be president. For those with less income, Dems will be a better choice. America is all about the balance of power and no extremist will be allowed in power.
A lot people think McCain will make a better president than Obama because he is too liberal…
It is not about the dems party, it is about who they can trust to be CIC.

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Did someone say Gore? He got some of my dough in 2000 and then the nut lost the election by walking across the stage, in a big debate, toward Bush like he was about to attack. Poor GW actually looked up with a startled look. I want my money back. Gore is intelligent but spaced out.

Posted by: bruce | May 7, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

David from Texas,
If the the DNC abandon Hillary why would Hillary stay with democrat?
Let’s her run as Independent and we will vote for her.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

hmm…walking across the stage toward Bush caused him to lose the election? Where were you when the Supreme Court broke the Constitution by crowning Bush? Gore won the popular vote, remember?
Anyway, Gore is smart, experienced, concerned, broadly knowledgeable, innovative, and has an “unimpeachable character.” Gee, what a relief that would be in a President. Now, his campaign managers did not do a good job in 2000. Coming in fresh in the summer or fall with the facts and message he can command…that would breathe some major league life into the Dems…and leave John McCain standing in the dust. I could go with that…easily…it’s about time he won! Finally…

Posted by: Mary | May 7, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

If Obama can win WV. and KY. I’ll vote for him after all he is the front runner.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

blue irish, how would the dnc be abandoning Hillary.

Posted by: lily | May 7, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

its looks as if the Mayan’s were right 2012 is the end. Obama will lose in the General Election Big!! He will make George McGovern loss look like a win.
McCain is the one to bring all to an end and thanks to Obama and the true bigoted blacks that had to vote for him, JUST BECAUSE HE WAS BLACK not because of issues. Can anyone tell me of another group of voters that gave a canidiate 92% of the vote in that group?

Posted by: Bob | May 7, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Bruce,
Good comment. Make me want to cry either.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Believe or not, only assunrance Dems can win over W.H. is both Hillary and Obama on the ticket..
Other than that, it will be a gamble…

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Here is my big problem with Hillary still in the race. She’s acting like President Bush. The Bush administration takes huge hits constantly (and rightly so) for always changing the measurement that defines success. Hillary has tried to re-define what winning or being ahead is in this primary as often as President Bush has re-defined success in Iraq. I’m not interested in that type of behavior from our President and certainly don’t want it from a nominee of my party

Posted by: Steve | May 7, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

I blame Donna B Dean Kery Gore Kennedy
Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton have been treated very badly by our party.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

“The DNC takes a deaf ear b/c they know as I know, every Hillary supporter knows come November… their voting Obama.”
It ain’t happening. Dream on. Come November, we will be at home laughing watching Tim Russert explain how the Republicans wrested victory from certain defeat by helping the Democrats destroy themselves in an election they said they couldn’t lose.

Posted by: len | May 7, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Bishop said, the Clintons have been treated very badly by the Democratic party.
Wow. You surely are spinning. Are you dizzy now? How about Clinton treating others badly? Did Bill campaign for Kerry? No, heart surgery. How about the 47 mysterious deaths around the Clintons? Are the Clintons not treating others BAD enough? Bishop you have been BLIND.

Posted by: Jen | May 7, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

I don’t think anyone should be telling Hillary to get out.I think people should be respectful that Hillary is staying in.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Hillary supporters , boycott any program in which Obama is appearing.
He is nothing but bad for America. Lrts unite and see how these Obama radicals win this election without us.

Posted by: Jack | May 7, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

blue irish,
Don’t be stupid. We democrats need to unite. I have kicked and screamed for Hillary but now it’s time for us to hold hands and sing “Kum-ba-ya” and stand behind Obama. Is everyone with me? Very important you get this message.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 7, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

You can count me out of the Obama Kool-aid parade. I would never vote for him.

Posted by: Mack | May 7, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

GEEEEE imagine trying to buy the White House..This woman does not have aclue the people have spoken

Posted by: older person | May 7, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Obama does not have the required delegates of 2210 (including FL and MI)and he or his supporters have no right to ask Hillary to quit.
Let Obama get the superdelegates help him reach 2210 and then Hillary will consider quiting.
Never to Obama

Posted by: Jack | May 7, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Yes.
I have always argued this.
Nobody in election history has won the nomination by LOSING every major primary.
Nobody has ever lost the California , Ohio, Pennysvannia , New Jersey, Mass, and Florida primaries and WON the nomination.
But obama had a SUPERIOR campaign.
No major analyst says Obama is the better general election candidate.
It doesnt matter. Obama has the delegate lead, and the super delegates wont take it away from him.
Sure its dissapointing, but its also not fair to set out the rules where its all about delegates, then take it away from Obama.
So lets get over it, stop the whining and rally around Obama.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 7, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Angry African: Very well said.
Come on people, it’s time to stop the bickering and unite as a party.

Posted by: Don | May 7, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

As to Hillary’s comment about if we had the same rules as the Republicans she would be the nominee– if we had the same rules as the Republicans we would be Republicans and sometimes Hillary gives a pretty good impression of being one– the 11 and one half million dollar “loan” rating at least half a Romney for self-help.

Posted by: bhciapol | May 7, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

@DCVoter,
Are you the same DCVoter I know?
It sounds not like you.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Two words:
pipe dream

Posted by: Disdain Lady | May 7, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

blue Irish – I agree, it’s not the real DCVoter.

Posted by: Don | May 7, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

No can do. He doesn’t deserve to be President. I don’t care about making history by voting for the first black president, or woman president for that matter. We need a real candidate, not an empty suit thats been coddled and propped up by the MSM. He is the least qualified of the remaining candidates, including Nader. If this is the direction that the Democratic party is taking, you can count me out of it.

Posted by: Mack | May 7, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Since Obama has hijacked the Democratic primary with the black vote and McCain is unelectable to most Americans, Hillary has to seriously consider running as an independent candidate in the next election. Go for it girl !

Posted by: Johnny Boy | May 7, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

DCVoter,
If you are the same DCVoter I know, I’m very disappointed of you.
Anyway, I’m already decided not to vote for Obama. That’s my choice.
It’s not our problem, that’s his problem he can’t unite this country.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Some imposters are on this blog trying to get Hillary’s supporters to vote for Obama.
Beware of that.
HILLARY IS STILL ON.
She is still on the race.
It is not end yet until the convention.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

If she takes it all the way to the convention. A convention fight would not only damage the party. It would do irreparable damage to Hillary herself. If she ever had any hope of running again in 2012 it would be gone. She would be branded as the one who divided the party and lost the election. She would be shunned by most top democrats.

Posted by: myname | May 7, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t there already an Independent candidate in the race? Is Ralph Nader still hanging around?

Posted by: myname | May 7, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

@Lisa,Mack,Jack,
That DCVoter has responded to us is not the same DCVoter we know.
Don’t believe him.
Thanks

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

The reason that blacks are voting for Obama instead Hillary is because they don’t trust her? Ok, whatever you say.

Posted by: Mack | May 7, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Oh before my cold one let me say that I agree with Mack.

Posted by: myname | May 7, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

I’ve been a Democrat all my life, but will change parties as soon as this primary is over. The party has been highjacked and I no longer trust them. Myself, family and friends will vote for McCain in the general election. Former Democrats for McCain

Posted by: kittyCat | May 7, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

DCVoter, I am an Obama supporter but if Hillary wants to stay in the race then she should. And if she is the nominee I will vote for her. I’m not the type to stomp my feet and take my toys and go home just because the person I supported did get the nomination. We can’t afford to have the republicans in the white house. I can’t imagine how the economy could get much worse but everyone needs to understand that it will.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Again, don’t you really think Dems can save US economy? The one fundamental difference between Dems and Reps is: Reps perfers tax cut and smaller government while Dems prefer tax increase and more government control. They are different approaches, the question is which approach will be the best to boost our economy?? No one has a clear answer…

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Once the general happens …
and all of you who say “i am okay with voting for McCain”
Really?=
Have you even seen him on the stump? Do you know his second talking point consistently is Right to Life. Do you know he wants to overturn Roe vs. Wade and we need one more appointee and that will be done…have you seen the “liberal” justices lately and how old they are looking?
Do you realize almost all of his policies are similar to Bush with regard to the economy?
Do you realize that he can never put us back in a good light with the rest of the world with his foreign policy stance?
and the list goes on…
but you know what be mad and say “I can’t vote my conscience for Obama” but you can tell your nieces and nephews and your sons and daughters when they are sitting in the mess that this country is and may even more so become as you leave them with debt upon debt and beholden to China and saudi Arabia….
You can say when they ask you when everything went so wrong… that you voted for McCain.

Posted by: dl | May 7, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Vanessa,
I’m not bitter, I’m just planning to vote for the best candidate. At this point Hillary, Ralph, and John happen to outrank Barack as the best candidate.
========================================
Obama lost Indiana, his neighboring state
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 7, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Nicholas,
Good list.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Obama will be the nominee and he will NEVER win in November.
That’s all for you, Dems.
How fantastically reproducible you guys are:
Dukakis, Gore, Kerry, Obama!!!
McCain 2008!!!

Posted by: Jkan | May 7, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Have you even seen him on the stump? Do you know his second talking point consistently is Right to Life. Do you know he wants to overturn Roe vs. Wade and we need one more appointee and that will be done…have you seen the “liberal” justices lately and how old they are looking?
Do you realize almost all of his policies are similar to Bush with regard to the economy?
Do you realize that he can never put us back in a good light with the rest of the world with his foreign policy stance?
and the list goes on…
DL, If that is a problem to you then contact our superdelegates and tell them to vote for Clinton at the Convention. IF McCain is President that only Obama supporters have themselves to blame. YOu have be warned tha Obama is unelectable

Posted by: geevill | May 7, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

If super delegates hand the nomination to Obama, they’ll be holding their breath until November, just waiting for the other shoe to drop.
What a way to manage an election!

Posted by: s. valenti | May 7, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

The truth is McCain doesn’t have to do anything about Roe v. Wade. Don’t you know that physicians have been taking themselves out of the abortion business?
McCain won’t touch the abortion issue with a ten foot pole.

Posted by: s. valenti | May 7, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

DCvoter…No way will I vote for Obama. If he was the only one in the race I wouldn’t bother to vote. Party means nothing as far as I’m concerned. The important thing is to make sure the President has the ability to guide this country. That would not be Obama. That would be Hillary. I don’t care if she’s a democrat, Independent or Republican. If she is out…McCain gets my vote. My husbands too. We can’t stand Obama and his marxist views or his associates. His wife doesn’t deserve to be first lady of this country. That is an insult to everyone that loves this country. She is a hateful woman.

Posted by: carolyn | May 7, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

If the Democrats tell Hillary she’s out of the running, I hope she runs independent. Then she can show the DNC that she was right and let them know where they stuff it!!!!

Posted by: carolyn | May 7, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

myname…Are you trying to be comical or what??? You say Hillary would shunned and unable to run in 2012. Where have you been hiding? You must have been panting breathlessly after Obama while many other people saw Hillary treated so badly by the DNC, the media and the press. All to glorify this marxist idiot Obama. Farrakhan, Wright, Ayers, Michelle, are all reasons to pray that Obama will NEVER be the President of this great country.

Posted by: carolyn | May 7, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Yes Yes Yes CAROLYN!

Posted by: irma | May 7, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

geevil…You are 100% right!

Posted by: carolyn | May 7, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Hillary is right again! Kerry knows, how could he forget? Oh, if only the Republican Party had these contrived rules to prove “fairness”! If we had theirs, life would be simple again. Alas, we don’t. We will just have to let this stupid process do what it was intended to do. Right, DNC and Superdelegates? Obama does not need any extra time to prepare for McCain and the GE. Oh, maybe he does, but Hillary doesn’t. She is tough and she is ready now! VOTE FOR MAMA, NOT OBAMA!

Posted by: georgia | May 7, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

For those of you who respect me, I appreciate it. If Hillary is nominated, of course I’d vote for her. But you have to understand the situation now.
Myname is right on, exatly my opinion, “If she takes it all the way to the convention. A convention fight would not only damage the party. It would do irreparable damage to Hillary herself. If she ever had any hope of running again in 2012 it would be gone. She would be branded as the one who divided the party and lost the election. She would be shunned by most top democrats.” People, time to wake up. How long do you want to kick and scream? I have been doing that for 3 months now, it’s not that I haven’t tried. But we need to unite together to defeat the other party, remember?

Posted by: DCVoter | May 7, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

DCVoter, I respectfully disagree with you. We have had plenty of floor fights in the past. That is what Conventions do. They chose John Kennedy, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Adlai Stevenson. The negatives this year were largely created by the Party. No state should have their votes destroyed. The Superdelegate process needs to be fixed. The skewed caucuses need to be eliminated. The Superdelegates should not try to force any candidate to get out until the Convention. The Party created this mess. Of course, the biased media is a major industry trying to pick our candidates for us in this rapid anti-fair spin they call journalism. We need to fight them.
Furthermore, if any nominee is not ready to face the opposition in November, he or she should not enter the race. Shouldn’t they currently be prepared to debate, think, and stand on their own two feet?
I am not kicking and screaming. I am still thinking of our future and the kind of leader we need. Instead of worrying about someone’s political chances in 2012, I am thinking of the knowledge, experience, and readiness of the leader we need now. I did not vote for George Bush either time, but, I did vote for Gore and Kerry. Here we are, the time is now. I wish Gore had won, because I knew he had the most knowledge, experience, and great characteristics on day one. We do not need the inexperience of Obama. We need a ready leader and qualified Senators and Representatives to fight for the good of the people.
I understand your worry, but I do not believe that Obama has enough knowledge of the issues or enough experience. We could have a big discussion on how he arrived in the delegate count, but he does not have enough, and all of the voters have not voted. Let’s let the Party hold OUR Convention after all the voters have voted. Otherwise, get rid of the stupid process. I probably agree with you on everything else.

Posted by: georgia | May 7, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

SJ, You have said it best! The largest base of the Democrat Party are women. They are the largest base for Hillary. Yet, when referring to statistical groups, they are referred to as “older women” as if they do not matter. They helped build the Party. You are absolutely right. The Party has counted on them year after year.
Another demographic that is spoken of in a derogatory way is the reference to “uneducated white”. Do we ever hear “uneducated black” used as a voting block? All hell would break loose! The Party is playing with fire. Many of us know where we have been. Many others do not even have a clue.

Posted by: georgia | May 7, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Oketola,
I’m with you.
Thanks

Posted by: blue Irish | May 8, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Hillary is setting herself up to be the comedians’ favorite punchline for the next 4 years.

Posted by: Thomas Mc | May 8, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

DCvoter
I have a long way to go before I will support BO Hillary has to be on the ticket and even then I think thats an insult she is far more reasonable and qualfied speakign of qualifiers perhaps if BO runs and wins and pledges to serve only one term and let Hillary have it because she shouldnt have to wait 8 years to run again!

Posted by: staniam | May 8, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

If Hillary were to run as an Independent, I would vote for her, as well as many other Clinton supporters I suspect.

Posted by: david from texas | May 8, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Obama is going to get CRUSHED…..
…I cant wait for Nov…. :)

Posted by: Jay | May 8, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Obama is going to get CRUSHED…..
…I cant wait for Nov…. :)

Posted by: Jay | May 8, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Okay WE are another day closer to November and I heard more good news today than for the past four months. The energy crisis will be over by March 2009. (Gasoline will go back down to $3.50 a gallon after peaking at $4.75 a gallon in Florida) As soon as the election is over the extra profits by the oil industry will be fully invested in our new government. (Republican’s get the oil drilling in Alaska) Globe warming concerns will be greatly reduced because significant USA reduction in large vehicles. President Bush’s war will be over and the majority of troops will home. Americans in those small towns of Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan will again be using natural gas rather than oil for heating. Children will be moving back into parents homes paying down credit cards. The America dollar will be back even with Euro. President McCain will be working with middle east countries to allow oil to flow more freely to China but the demand in China will also be dropping. Oil from Citgo will be flowing again because the unique approach of John McCain will be using to quickly put Bush views on the back porch. The 2008 oil and natural gas finds in Pennsylvania coupled with a mild winter will end our deep 2 year recession. Property values will stablize in Florida and investors from Great Britian will be buying properties in Florida, the rush to buy America will simply end the Bush oil profit recession. Thanks President John McCain …YOU saved America!! Hillary and Bill will be enjoying retirement they will go to St. Thomas for at least the winter months. (Megans Bay)(Bill loves to play golf there). Richard Paul Dembinsky (google me)

Posted by: richarddembinsky | May 8, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.