By MichaelJames

May 7, 2008 8:40pm

Clinton Says Elections Can Turn in a Day

ABC News’ Eloise Harper reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton provided some insight on how she views the current state of the Democratic primaries at a Washington fundraiser tonight.

For starters, Clinton, D-N.Y., said she’s not going anywhere.

“I am in this race. I am staying in this race,” Clinton said at the fundraiser focused on women and families.

Clinton cited her experience in the New Hampshire primary in January as an example of the way the election could turn in her favor.

“I came to New Hampshire on a Thursday night down nine points and I won on Tuesday," she said. "You can turn elections in a day.”

The senator from New York has maintained a cool demeanor since her loss in North Carolina Tuesday and close victory in Indiana. She came prepared with a message for members of the party who were nervous about the current state of affairs.

“I understand that some people are getting a little nervous," she said. "And I have to say that there really is no cause for nervousness — because we will have a unified Democratic Party.” 

Clinton spoke about the historic nature of a woman running for a president as another reason to soldier on.

“Too many people have fought too hard to see a woman in this race," she said. "This is a history-making race and I want everybody to understand that. There is no cause for alarm. Sometimes you’ve got to calm people down a little bit.”

Clinton said she saw the matter of counting votes cast in Florida and Michigan’s disputed early primaries as a “civil rights” issue. Currently, the Democratic Party is not counting those votes because the states defied the party in setting the primary dates. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., the current Democratic frontrunner, was not even on the ballot in Michigan.

“I will be sending a letter to Sen. Obama and [Democratic National Committee] Chairman [Howard] Dean expressing my strong belief that this issue about the voters in Florida and Michigan is a civil rights issue,” Clinton said. “And we need to stand up and say the Democratic Party is smart enough to figure out how make sure we don’t disenfranchise two states we have to win.”

Clinton took what likely were subtle swipes at Obama, saying, “I’ve been around too long. I know it’s not enough just to believe in a person. You have to believe in a cause.”

She added, “Being president is not like making a speech. Being president is one of the most challenging– In fact, I would say it’s the toughest job in the world.”

Clinton thanked the women who have helped her tip the scales in past elections.

“When I was counted out in New Hampshire, it was the women in New Hampshire who came back and said, ‘No, she is not finished yet,’" Clinton said. "When I was counted out before Super Tuesday, it was women from California to Massachusetts who came and said, ‘No, we’re not finished.’ When I was counted out before Ohio, before Indiana, we have always come back. And it’s not so much about my comeback it is about our comeback. And more importantly, it is about America’s comeback.”

Clinton’s daughter Chelsea took questions from the crowd before her mother took the stage. When asked if there was going to be a White House wedding, Chelsea said that many things would have to happen before that, but finally said, “I cant really see past next Tuesday in West Virginia.”

Hillary Clinton raised $1 million at the fundraiser. She has more events scheduled in West Virginia, South Dakota and Oregon Thursday, continuing her campaign with no break at all.

User Comments

Yeah, I didn’t think she would back away.

Posted by: MovieWatcher | May 7, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

I scorn those who think that Hillary Clinton should give up because they say she should. Why doesn’t Rookie U.S. Senator Obama give up instead? After all, Obama is not going to win Ohio, Florida, or the U.S. presidential election in November. Since he is going to lose in November anyway, why doesn’t the National Media ask him to give up, step aside, and let a real fighter, Hillary Clinton, to go toe-to-toe with John McCain instead.

Posted by: USmarine0331 | May 7, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Name one male candidate that the media and democrats have demanded leave the race?

Posted by: s. valenti | May 7, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Yes they can, and it did on may 6th.
It is not Hillary’s to win it is Obama’s to loose, and he certainly is not going to do that.
She will get the message.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | May 7, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

When Hillary says she’s in to win, we gotta believe her. Go Hillary!! We love you!!

Posted by: andrea | May 7, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Obama DID say that Indiana was the “tiebreaker” at one point, right?

Posted by: Pam | May 7, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Hillary is sounding more and more desparate every day.

Posted by: Stacey | May 7, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

A spate of new public polls out this week confirms what we have been arguing for some time: Hillary Clinton is the strongest candidate to beat John McCain in November.
The data shows that Clinton not only outperforms Obama in head-to-head matchups, but is also stronger in the all important subcategories that serve as bellwethers for a candidate’s overall strength. In addition, new data out today in three swing states vital to Democratic prospects in November show Clinton beating McCain.
YoBama!

Posted by: SteveC | May 7, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

There’s one problem…Back in NH, there was time to make gains. We only have a handful of delegates left. No enough time for her to make her gains

Posted by: Vanessa | May 7, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

There’s one problem…Back in NH, there was time to make gains. We only have a handful of delegates left. No enough time for her to make her gains

Posted by: Vanessa | May 7, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Thanks Flavoter
Nice fair and balanced report on Obama. Hannity would absoultely love it.
But what is sooo bad about that is … this dude is wiping the floor with ole hillary … What does that say about her…..

Posted by: Omentum | May 7, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Hey
If you can believe you ducked sniper fire I guess it’s a fair point that she believes that this is not over.

Posted by: Omentum | May 7, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

i have to say, as a conservative none the less, that she has every right to stay in till the end. it would be different if barack COULD get the delegates, but he cant. so, its all up to the supers. politics can change daily. there is no reason why they couldnt pick her. that being said, they wont because they want to get the ball rolling against mccain. its a catch 22 for me because i have not liked either of the “god like clintons” ever. BUT, barack is just plain ol’ scary as a politcian let alone a leader. i mean, socialistic scary. so as happy as i am to say goodbye to the clintons, mccain HAS TO WIN IN NOVEMBER. thats all there is to it. he is our only hope, and we ALL hvave to stand behind him.

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Why in the world are you people donating?!?
You do realize that all that money is going to pay her loan. It will not be positive income for her campaign. She is down 11.4 Million, there is no way you guys can raise that, especially after a brutal loss like that last night. (Notice how not one clinton surroagate talked about the money they raised from their IN win). Any money you donate will have nilch effect on her campaign.
Your campaign is dead in the water and is relying on getting MI/FL votes allocated, which even then still has you behind!
What I find more insulting is that Clinton campaign has zero care for any of Obama’s supporters who will feel pained if she becomes nominee, yet wields her supporters like a threat to get superdelegates to hold off.
No Class.

Posted by: Rob | May 7, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Hillary should give up because each day that this non-race dominates the media is a day that there is no attention paid to McCain and his faults.
Perhaps once the general is upon us and you guys (supposedly Democrats) are still assailing Obama for the Reverend Wright non-scandal, you will realize the true stakes of what is going on here.
The next President is going to be in charge of making 3-4 appointments to the Supreme Court as well as cleaning up the colossal failure that Bush has created in the past 8 years. We can continue with a Republican who is controlled by the right-wing of their party (as McCain most certainly would be), or we could have a Democrat bring in some level-headed and adult leadership to the White House.
I am an ardent Obama supporter, but if the tables were turned and it was Obama who had the mathematical disadvantage at this late point in the game, I would be supporting Hillary and expecting him to drop out and support her also.
Obama can only lose at this point if the Clinton supporters do not back him against McCain. And Obama’s and Clinton’s positions on the issues are so similar that you really have to question the motives of those Clinton supporters who say they will not support Obama in the fall.

Posted by: Will | May 7, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

I like Eloise Harper. Eloise is a trustworthy reporter, always fair and objective, with respect.
Media simply refuses to give Hillary credit for winning Indiana – she came from behind and outspent 2-to-1, with national media on Obama’s side.
I’m 100% certain Obama could not match up to what Hillary has achieved under the similar circumestances.

Posted by: zhengli | May 7, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Just so Hillary understands this-
She is NOT the measuring stick by which we can measure how far women have come. I think this woman is a corrupted figure and KARMA is hitting her hard in the face.
I only have to look to my own mother and my older sisters to know that women have made big strides in being respected in this nation. They are women that I strongly model myself after because they are strong in character and values. Those values have earned the respect of their male peers in their respected fields and never had to compromise one ounce of what makes them GOOD women.
Hillary doesn’t speak for me. I don’t think Hillary needs to play the gender CARD, and her doing so only paints her in a depserate light…NOTHING STRONG ABOUT THAT!

Posted by: nancy | May 7, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

OMENTUM…
get real.. he definately is not wiping the floor with her!!! if that were the case, it would be over. and whether you will admit it or not, the only thing that is giving him the nomination is because of racial fallout the democrats will face if the supers vote for her. i guarantee you, three quarters of the supers WANT to pick hillary, but are to invested in barack. could you imagine the black populations reaction at this point if they voted for her?! the party of the people, the party that has taken care of them for decades??!! we all know that. she is much more experienced, and more toward the center than this leftist. he dosnt stand a chance aginst mccain. america will not vote for a socialist, plain and simple. at least hillary is towards the middle a little. i could see america giving her a shot, but not this guy.. not in a million years.

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Seriously,
Barack Obama owes a huge debt of gratitude. She made him a better candidate. She did him a big favor by busting his chops in this primary.
But she came up a little short and not we are beginning to cross the toxic line.
Please tell her its time to attack the GOP and not each other

Posted by: Omentum | May 7, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

I, for one, am praying that Hillary stays in the race and wins the nomination. She has all the credentials that are desirable in a candidate-unlike BO. She is articulate, has experience, and most of all a love of country, which Obama & wife do not. The more we learn about him and his friends, the less assured I am that he is really a patriot. I cannot believe that the black population share Rev Wright’s beleifs!!

Posted by: virginia | May 7, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Perhaps something we don’t know about Obama can become known prior to the covention. Besides it is latte liberals who are weak spineless quitters. Obama quit debating like the sissy he is.

Posted by: geevill | May 7, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

will-
When was the last time you saw Hillary wear the flag-pin, because in all the debates, campaign stumps, news apprearance, I have NEVER seen her wearing one!

Posted by: stacy | May 7, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

THE BLACKS,THE ACTIVISTS AND THE ULTRA LEFT WING LIBERALS,DESTROYING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE IN G.E.
HILLARY NEEDS TO LEAVE THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY AND RUN AS AN INDEPENDENT WITH
BLOOMBERG AS VP.
NEW ABC POLL:70% OF HILLARY’S SUPPORTERS
IN INDIANA WILL NOT VOTE FOR HUSSEIN
OBAMA IN G.E.
I WILL VOTE FOR JOHN McCAIN IN G.E.
….THE END OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
AS WE KNOW IT.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 7, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

I can’t figure where anyone says Clinton came from behind in IN. She was leading by about 8% the first of March and kept the lead until the last week in April and regained it the first week of May. Real Clear Politics.

Posted by: Thinking | May 7, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

zhengli, Hillary did not come from behind in Indiana. It’s just the opposite. The whole country knows the Clintons. That’s why she was considered the front runner early on.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

pretty well said nicholas.. after ALL of this chaos, you made the biggest blunder of all that your party could have done… go with barack obama, the MOST liberal man in the senatee to try to win the white house??!! i mean im ecstatic thats the situation, but as a party, how the hell did you end up with this guy?! it just shows where your politics have finally gottn you after all these years.. the beginning of socialism.

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Hillary supporter… YOU ARE A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES… You don’t support her. If you did, she would be BROKE. How many of you have donated to her campaign?
Are you doing anything for her. Or all of you just lazy crabby Obama haters.

Posted by: Omentum | May 7, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

No it is not “white working class” I am “white working class”. It has everything to do with where in the country one lives. Some areas are more progressive then others.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | May 7, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

She’s done…

Posted by: blog | May 7, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

OMENTUM…
im a conservative. i think BOTH of these canidates are a waste of skin. AND i am not playing for either team… i am stating the truth as a person with
no agenda. i will vote for mccain because i am a conservative, not because i like him. im not like most democrats and leftists who plaster bumper stickers on their cars, try to go and get all the young, clueless voters they can get to the polls, or treat him like the messiah. or like he is going to ” change ” the country and the world. i dont play that game. im picking him because he is the closest thing to a conservative there is left. if barack was a conservative, i would vote for him. im not playing the race card. i am simply saying that obama, at the beginning of all this, had a god like quality with the dems. he couldnt say ANYTHING wrong. as time went on, america found out more about him and his history,(very distubing by the way) but by that point alot of damage was done to hillaryand he had a big lead, and continued to hang onto that lead. let me make two points: if your party and parties state officials didnt make the BIGGEST VOTER MISTAKE/ FRAUD IN MODERN AMERICAN HISTORY, she would have gotten the nomination. if michigan and florida counted, he loses. plain and simple. now, that being said , at this point hillary isnt very far behind. just so happens neither can get the needed delegates. even though the tides have turned from obama and most americans know he has a VERY SKETCHY PAST, and inexperienced there is too much invested in him. he went too far for the supers to say, we cant give it to him. thats all im saying. but what if there is even more chaos to come?? what if they DO something about MI. and FL. ???!! then what?!

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

@s. valenti: (from way up in the beginning) The answer to your question is Romney. He could have bloodied up McCain much more had he stayed in the race.

Posted by: MIguy | May 7, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

50% of voters think that OBAMA’s connection with Rev Wright matters in their votes. 20 years of audacity and hope with a hateful cult is impossible to dissolve by words of denouncement reluctantly displayed in an election.
Out of that 70% breaks for Hillary explicitly. 30% may choose to sit out.
Now if we try to add (0.5*.7) = 0.35 of the votes, Hillary will get 35% of votes before Rev Wright’s issue was exposed. That is very substantial.
I didn’t even count the votes that OBAMA lost because of the issue. Hillary is sitting on a very comfortable cushion when the general election begins. If you add up the votes that he lost from rural American. It must raise lots of eyebrows.
OBAMA would have lost a significant amount of votes. Of course you can count on that OBAMA will still get his 92% of black votes.
Heaven only knows how many Rev. Wright that OBAMA has in his oblivion.
We want a winner; not a scratch or gutter ball candidate who have been trying to dig in a default winning of nomination.
His suggestion of splitting the delegates of Michigan and Florida is outrageous. The whole Obama fans have been trying to set up the tune for Hillary to drop out that we should do it for the party. It sounds like communist party rather than for democracy.
He is not a believer of democracy but an empty suit who tries to steal presidency. Washington is not a rookie camp and this country has the massive destructive weapon in stock.
Are we going to hand this to a questionable candidate?

Posted by: John_Lai | May 7, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

I say, “Let the process continue!” Those who try to use a stopwatch before the race is finished must not like the process. Change this stupid process! Let the rest of the people vote! Hillary does not have enough delegates, and Obama does not have enough delegates. He needs extra time to prepare for McCain? Why? We should have already heard and seen why he is better than McCain. He is not! We can readily see that Hillary is better than McCain.
Spin all you want. Regardless, until the process is finished, for me it is:
VOTE FOR MAMA, NOT OBAMA!

Posted by: georgia | May 7, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

As the annointed nominee Obama will sweep the remaining primaries right? I mean 23% did not vote for McCain on the GOP side yesterday and it was big news on Drudge.

Posted by: geevill | May 7, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Sorry,
I forget to take off two states for OBAMA. In a winner-take-all election, OBAMA definitely will lose these two states. Hillary has a good chance to catch on these two states.
OBAMA is in terrible shape to start his general election campaign. He is unelectable.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 7, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

see, thats the biggest thing i personally dont understand about all of this for you democrats… what is the hurry really??!! put all of the “game” and competition away.. do you NOT know where obama and mccain bothe stand on the issues?! seriously, and your party has SERIOUSLY screwed the voting system already, so whats the hurry?? what do you need to “prepare”??!! the fricking vote isnt till november. think for yourselves and quit making it into a game.

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

tim
Yep with that wack talk.. you are a conservative…. congrats to you…. our current president is a conservative also….
question does conservative mean that you are conserving your brain and therfore you let hannity rush and fixed nutwork news tell you what to think. Just curious

Posted by: Omentum | May 7, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Obama is an admitted drug user. He is a pretty effeminate man married to an angry tall wife. Not so far fetched is it.

Posted by: geevill | May 7, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Tony I don’t know the answer because I really don’t care what religion he was or is. And why should that even matter. Besides you’re not voting for him no matter what.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

geevil you are grasping at straws here. And it’s pathetic what you will do to someone’s character because you don’t want them to be the canidate.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

tim
please forgive me. I was wrong about you. You are a level headed and respectable person… Sounds like Obama has your vote.
Be a bit more objective and I believe you would be sold on Obama
v/r

Posted by: Omentum | May 7, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Nancy – Remember Cindy Sheehan? All of you you are now screamin about the war in Iraq hated her too and said “she doesn’t speak for me.” What kind of woman are you anyway — or are you?

Posted by: druggstohr | May 7, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

every president is a delegator of responsibility… no president makes the decisions on their own. and if you think for a second she wont do the same thing, your living in a dream world.

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Hillary Clinton is a nut who changes the rules as she goes along in order to persist in the fight for what she thinks is owed to her. That makes her eerily similar to our current president and his insistence on bending the rules to justify what he wants to do. THIS LADY IS SCARY!!!

Posted by: Liz | May 7, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Can someone help me… I am the village idiot and have lost my way. Can someone help me get home.
My fellow villagers must miss throwing rocks and sticks at me because I’m always talking out my anus.
Help

Posted by: geeville | May 7, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

OMENTUM…
please tell me you are kidding…. i know EXACTLY where obama would lead this country… one step closer to socialism. i appreciate the kind words, but i could debate you all day on why mccain will be better for america than obama. but it would be hopeless cause, which is ok. thats the beauty of america. the part that scares me is that certain types of crazy thinking can spread. and slowly, it has spread in america. i dont think we are at the breaking point yet by in large, i mean the average american dosnt want the government to babysit us. and come november thats what it will come down to… do you want the governments nose in everything, or too leave us alone…

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Omentum: If the tables were turned I would NOT want Obama to concede! If the race is this close it is only bullying to ask your opponent to drop. Where’s your sense of fairness? I thought Obama fans were supposed to be beyond the “same old politics”. You have been trying to push Hillary out for months now regardless of what Obama’s lead is.

Posted by: al | May 7, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

I think Obama should be the one to quit. He doesn’t have what it takes to take all the heat and jab that Clinton is getting from the media and other. Most importantly he doesn’t have a specific plan with his so called “change” and “hope”. Those can be for the worst.
Obama is not going to win the general election. Republicans are the ones whose voting for him in the caucuses and small primaries. I wouldn’t even waste my vote on him. McCain will pound him in Nov. election.

Posted by: giz | May 7, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Omentum: If the tables were turned I would NOT want Obama to concede! If the race is this close it is only bullying to ask your opponent to drop. Where’s your sense of fairness? I thought Obama fans were supposed to be beyond the “same old politics”. You have been trying to push Hillary out for months now regardless of what Obama’s lead is.

Posted by: al | May 7, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

al
Maybe you wouldnt. But since obama is the “new kid on the block” going against the lead name in the dem party, everyone would be beating the drum soooo loud… he would be forced to quit.

Posted by: Omentum | May 7, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

I think she will and should stay in at least through next week, bow out on a couple of wins and show how necessary and needed she is in the party and probably end up consolidating some power within the party. Her tone has changed, she will look to move on, on her terms.

Posted by: Louis | May 7, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Tim>>>> leave us alone and they are crying fix my mortage fix the gas give me money for oil fix this do that you all cry for the governmant to fix all your messes.Make up your dumb minds.Who is going to give this dumb broke woman money and if they do they are DUMB all she wants is gets hers back and then she will drop out.Can’t by buy the White house. Clinton is now gone….but then again they play DIRTY ,,,,

Posted by: h | May 7, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Nicholas why do you keep repeating that you are voting for McCain. We get it, so just do it. But a lot of us are tired of the Bush and Clinton dynasties. That is the change I want, no more of the same.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

H…
im not sure if you agree wtih me or not.. i really didnt understand.. lol all i can say is, the more the government tries to fix problems, THEY MAKE THEM WORSE. thats why democrats and their huge government makes problems worse. because they think that they should be able to make everyones decisions for them, and take care of EVERYONE. look at what a joke the welfare system is in this country and that pretty much sums up a democrats mindset. they are smarter than us. and now you have obama and hillary saying we should take money from oil companies profits??!! and set up a board deciding what is a feasable amout of profit??!! what??!! is this america or communist russia??!! give me a break…

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Cult leader Obama would certainly crash and burn in November in the style of radical left wing liberal George McGovern – lose every single state except one state in the general election. Because of that McGovern train wreck, the superdelegate system of independent judgment was created as a rational check. McGovern himself is now subverting this system in endorsing Obama, another radical left wing liberal.
Sen. Clinton is the experienced, qualified, visionary leader who would defeat John McCain for the Democratic Party and make real changes with her solutions for America and restore this country’s good standing in the world.
It is apparent Sen. Clinton is under a misynogistic attack from the media and Obama political supporters.

Posted by: crat3 | May 7, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

She is trying to put a brave face on this. But as some point this is too much about her and too little about people.
There is something as over staying your welcome. That’s where Hillary is now. There is no chance in hell she could be the nominee unless she is looking for a coup of some sort.
I’m sorry, but at this point it’s just plain stupid.

Posted by: fooled_once | May 7, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

People, if Hillary is nominated of course I would vote for her. I am only asking you to look at the reality. I have kicked and screamed for her for over 3 months. Don’t you think I have done more than most of you to help Hillary? But I want the democrats to unite, more than a speciifc winner. Myname had put it perfectly, “If she takes it all the way to the convention. A convention fight would not only damage the party. It would do irreparable damage to Hillary herself. If she ever had any hope of running again in 2012 it would be gone. She would be branded as the one who divided the party and lost the election. She would be shunned by most top democrats.”

Posted by: DCVoter | May 7, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Let us not kid ourselves, all those screaming BO is not electable are the same people who have not liked him from day1 and would not vote for him anyway
At this point, they are trying to pretend to be democrats but they are truly not if they want to vote McSame because their candidate lost.
If they are so concerned about his religion, why are they not asking McSame the same questions about Hagee?????

Posted by: Too late | May 7, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Nicholas, it is the Hillary supporters that are destroying the party not Obama. I will vote for Hillary but you won’t vote for Obama. So I guess the issues don’t matter.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

OMENTUM…
first off, i never said he was my ideal canidate.. lol i would much rather have a more conservative to vote for come november than him. that being said, i will vote for him because he is the most conservative. plain and simple. as for the economy, he was simply trying to say he dosnt know alot about the economy.. lol the president isnt supposed to be an economist. they have to have a general idea, and he does, but he or she appoints advisors to deal with it. the war in iraq, im not so sure about. i can read through the lines when he says we could be there for a hundred years, but it dosent sound good. he needs to rephrase that a little. the sunni or shia thing, also not really his job right now. 99 percent of the troops over there dont know the different factions because they change all the time! dont take things so literally all the time. the gas tax holiday? its the political season, what can i say. they all have to play the game. as for why he is more electable than barack… barack is extremely liberal and inexperienced!!! he can preach all day about changing the way washington works because thats all he has to go on!!! read throught the lines again! he dosnt have the exprerience yet in washington, so he can try to fool people into thinking he will be “different”. do you ACTUALLY think he will be different?! he is way to far left on the war(pulling out immeadiately, which would be an utter disaster), the border issue(not going to be strong as most americans are demanding), the economy (you think mccain dosent know the economy but he does?!), health care(our country simply CANNOT afford what he or hillary wants, and america dosnt want socialized health care, go ask canada)… i could go on, but these are just a few

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

you know Lisa, i cannot understand why they claim BO is destroying the party when they are the ones threatening to withdraw their support, for what reason: BO won the contest.
Are these democrats at all, I doubt, they are just Bo haters
I will vote Hillary in a second if BO lost this nomination. If Hillary supporters claim to be true democrats, why are they not supporting the people’s voice, or were they expecting a coronation?

Posted by: Too late | May 7, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Where did George Bush’s experience get us Tim?

Posted by: Too late | May 7, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

How many voters are aware that Obama
was only in the Senate a total of 143 working days? And that he didn’t show up much of the time; and, he voted “present” most of the time, instead of taking a stand? Check the records.

Posted by: paul | May 7, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

It’s a tough situation for Hillary for sure. I don’t understand why Obama attorneys went to such great lengths to block revotes in FL and MI. But they did and without those two states in play, it’s just about undoable. She’s a tough, smart leader who really hit her stride of late. She’s razor close in every measure, but Obama still has a lead in every way. I hope the Dem primary system will be reformed because it stinks. What a jumble of nonsense with proportional delegate apportionment, superdelegates, a mix of caucuses and primaries and sometimes both in the same state, and of course, MI and FL. The rules are bizarre, but both candidates played by them and Obama has edged her out. Now the burden shifts to Obama to win the general.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 7, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Do we need mother Pinocchio in DC?
We have them all together for long time.
Enjoy the show…

Posted by: somename | May 7, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Exactly Too late. True dems would not vote for a republican in this ecomony. And George Bush did this to us. And yet they want McCain. I guess the economy is not hurting Hillary supporters, but it sure is hurting me.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

So you are obviously Rep. Can you leave out the Dems to battle it out?
We know you will not vote for BO, why should anyone keep on with you.
Why are do Clinton supporters feel so badly about BO’s candidacy, if she was that qualified, the least she could have done was prove it with this simple primary, obviously, it was not that simple.

Posted by: Too late | May 7, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Hillary is tough, but she is not trustworthy. Were she president she would be as opaque as Bush is. For me her mendacity outweighs her toughness. Make a deal with the devil and you end up in the dark world. This country did it with Bush and look where we are.
But I do understand why some are impressed.

Posted by: Ron M | May 7, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Tim, I don’t need to humor you. But he has been the president of this country for 8 years. And our country has gone down the tubes because of him.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

If Obama will be the president then the time during Bush going to be feel like the golden one. And you can put it in the bank

Posted by: Mike | May 7, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

If you want to excuse him for not wearing the flagpin, fine.
How about did not pledge to National Anthem? Is he a US citizen?
I think that is disrespectful.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

tim I could go into a long answer for you but what I have realized on these blogs is that people don’t really read the long posts. And I have put a lot of thought into them so I don’t do that anymore. So I just do short answers now.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Those who compare Clinton to Obama and say he could not do what she did are right. By the same token Clinton could not do what Obama has done. He does not have a spouse to whom many owe political favors. Obama has a much higher ethical standard. He could not sink to Hillary’s level and she could not rise to his. He has assemble an excellent field operation. She has had to depend on the governors in Ohio and Pennsylvania for that operation.
Obama does not have the political connections that keep Hillary in this race at this point so he would have to drop out. Also he is not narcissistic, a trait which allows her to stay in. She is depending that the remaining superdelegates are reluctant to put the noose around her campaign. She feels so entitled to the nomination that she will not take that responsibility away from them. They don’t want to determine the nominee.
I do agree with those that say that Obama could not do what Hillary is doing. I say Thank God.

Posted by: Ron M | May 7, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Obama will be the nominee – it is time to move on. The argument that women will not come over to Obama is false. Any pro-choice woman (or man) should think twice before voting for McCain. McCain has said he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade and there are two Supreme Court Justices who are due to come off the bench. Stevens is 88 and Ginsburg is 75.
While some of you are spewing worthless vile back and forth in an obscure effort to claim the high ground for your candidate – issues and concerns are being left in the dust. It is time to move on.

Posted by: Paige | May 7, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

LISA…
believe me, i will read your reply siing how i asked you the question.. lol i want your answer on why gerge bush is to balme for the economy crisis?? i dont want to be viewed as a huge bush suppoter, because i disagree with ALOT he has done. mainly with the war. but if you are going to make harsh statements like he is to blame for economy, i want your babsis for such a harsh statement. im sick of democrats who blame blame blame but have no better ideas or even an understanding??!! you do realize the democrats have had the majority in congress for over two years again right? any new ideas from them on the economy that has gotten terrible since they have ruled , or gas prices which have soared since they have the majority?? and you want to put the blame on the president? not banks, or lenders??!! cmon.. all i want is your basis for a statement.

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

By the way the media is behaving, one would think that Hillary had not won 5 of last 6 primaries. Yes, Obama only won 1 of them. Obama has *lots* of skeletons in his closet that are soon to be published by the main stream media. Pay attention, people. Think for yourselves and quit acting like sleeping sheep. Hillary is the only one who has a clue of the three folks left. Obama freaks, YOU are the ones that need to let go. You are all in a deep state of denial. You don’t want to believe that he is the dirtiest kind of politician because he told you otherwise. You all still want to believe that he’s the messiah. He ain’t. And ya’ll need to wake up immediately. Hillary exaggerated her story about the sniper fire and whatnot, ya, ya. But Obama full-on LIES and PLAGERIZES and PANDERS. Obama is chummy with the oil companies, yo! We don’t need anymore big oil folks in the white house. Please, wake up before you nominate this sleaze.

Posted by: CoffeAlert | May 7, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

When Obama lost Texas,CA,Ohio,Pennsylvania those big states Super D ,media never call him to drop out the race.
Hillary lost only NC why they asked her to drop out?
I know he got more delegates because Super D endorsed him.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

HRC never comments upon the loss of our Constitution rights which she approved by voting for the anti-American terrorist bill. She is part of the problem. Obama will restore the Constitution.
She will not. Her politics and policy is to take the play from the right wing by out winging them. She doesnt say anything about habeas corpus, your right to be charged with a crime. Wonder why?
The Constitution says that only in the event of an invasion or insurrection can habeas corpus be TEMPORARILY suspended.
Never hear her say a thing about habeas corpus?
Right. She wants things just the way they are.
Vote for Obama and change her politics by terror back to freedom for America.

Posted by: bruce becker | May 7, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Right now the odds of Hillary getting the nomination are less than some unknown candidate other than Hillary, Edwards or Obama. Obama is within 4% of the odds of McCain getting the nomination. Maybe it is time to stop insulting each other and accept that Obama is the nominee, every bit as much as McCain is.

Posted by: Ronnn | May 7, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Becker
Obama says he was a full professor of Constitutional law but indeed he wasnt! 50 percent of those that voted for Clinton in IN will not vote for Obama … my Rep in NC heath shuler is now a Clinton superdelegate no deal she will not drop out

Posted by: staniam | May 7, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

vote McCain will have a dem house and sen. so will be fine.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Ronnn
NO Never.. we will always support Hilalrry and never Obama and you need us to win the GE so you arent gettin a thing

Posted by: staniam | May 7, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

blue Irish.
Obama won Texas. Look it up.
He got 99 delegates and she got 94.
Oh, I forgot, you and HRC dont count delegates, you count some other stuff, maybe the shape of the state on a map.
Delegates is the only metric in the primary, blue Irish.

Posted by: bruce becker | May 7, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

I feel a Hillary love fest here. Oh Hillary we will never leave you. What is up with that.

Posted by: d | May 7, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

The bought one has plenty of money and that would be Obama I will have no problem voting McCain the dems in the house and senate will keep him in check

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

what a lot of words with no enlightenment on who is best qualified to be president. Go Hillary, go. Don’t
let the male dominated biased media
relegate you to the back of the bus.

Posted by: Alice Ropchan | May 7, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Obama had said that Indiana was going to be the tie breaker. Hillary won it !!!! So why is Obama and his lapdog media now portraying it as her loss?
Can you believe that some of the media pundits characterize Hillary’s victory in Indiana as “Obama almost won Indiana” therefore is time for her to quit? The nerve!!!!

Posted by: Michael | May 7, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

staniam,
I dont know what kind of teaching job he had at Northwestern law school, what his title was.
Your “ad hominem” consideration is irrelevant.
He does say he will restore our civil rights, habeas corpus.
I care about the Constitution.
I took an oath to defend it against all enemies, foreign AND domestic. HRC is a player, scared to come out and stand up for your rights, my rights, our rights. She is afraid of the swiftboaters, I suppose. I dont need to speculate on her motives, why she never speaks out on this. The fact is, she doesnt, and Obama does.
Your insinuation about his teaching job is not material to the facts, sir.

Posted by: bruce becker | May 7, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Tim
Hillary will not be railroaded by Obama people it is right for her to stay in the race and you need Clinton people to get Obama elected and we probably wont support him

Posted by: staniam | May 7, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

First of all, Obama won Texas, he won more of the states delegates. She has no path to victory. A vote for McCain is a vote for more right wing supreme court justices who want to decide what a woman does with her own body.
Enough said.

Posted by: NotSuprised | May 7, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Becker
It does not matter sir….that is not the subject here Hillary will stay in the race and has a right to do so and you dont have free reign to attack the Clintons no way no how

Posted by: staniam | May 7, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

JOE…
the rev. wright thing IS AN ISSUE!!! its just too far along now that he has got the nomination. and it will continue to be an issue until he loses in november, dont fool yourself.

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

TIm
You are right I always dismissed the rights argument before that Democratic candidates that act elite and have people liek Wright in their pasts cant get elected I understand the argument now we sent up Gore and Kerry and they were promising but didnt do a thing in the GE

Posted by: staniam | May 7, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Wright is only an issue to narrow minded people. I could care less about him. I want real issues discussed. What will Obama do about the economy and the war and health care.

Posted by: d | May 7, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Staniam,
Yes, the problem people don’t know where his money comes from unless they saw on that website.
Speaks louder than acts.
He got his people but not us.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 7, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Hillary can still win I can’t believe they are using the same republican play book against her. Obama has been negative from day one he wasn’t runing as ablack man but how many time did he say he was bi-racial . Vote McCain the house and senate will be democratic.its good to see our Democratic leaders are split and fighting its been going on for fifty years they are always split .

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

exactly.. and obama is going to be no different. too much riding on the state of the nation right now to choose “hope” and “change”…

Posted by: tim | May 7, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Alice, it is not about whether the media are dominated by men. Is about her character.
And about her willingness to undermine the democratic process in her grasp for the office.
Consider the following two points, please.
A. Thou shall not bear false witness.
1. HRC spoke in NH and said Michigan should not count.
2. Her chief advisors voted in the DNC committee that Michigan should not count.
3. Now they say it should count. That is bearing false witness. They signed papers. It is not refutable.
B. Why is NH first? Democracy. If a pair of big states were indeed first, say MICH and FLA with a combined population of 35 million, then only the name brands like movie stars and political families with great wealth, and the super wealthy could compete from the start.
ALICE: By having teeny NH first, anyone writing on this blog could campaign for a few months and have their point of view heard in town halls in the few towns in the entire state. That’s democracy. So, not only is she a liar on this issue of counting MICH, because she spoke clearly to NH that MIch must not count, but it is a lie on the most important aspect of the election itself, that the electoral process may be available to you, and me, as well as the Rockefellers, Kennedys and actors, Ronald Reagan, for instance.

Posted by: bruce becker | May 7, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Tim
Obama people dont believe or dont know that there needs to be basis in facts and general knowledge of issues that are not related directly to Obama gettign elected that they need to know such as how government works and the economy

Posted by: staniam | May 7, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Is the Democrat run entering the ruthless zone? Let’s see, mathemagically impossible to get the needed delegates; Hillary exhibiting a defiant posture; Loaning her own money to the campaign; She is slowing the verbal attacks on Obama … times appear desperate.
Both candidates have made exaggerated mistakes that can be attributed to being stretched thin by their respective campaigns. Let’s hope that sanity prevails. It’s a bit like a playground fight brewing. Both opponents have started with how good they are, moved on to how bad the other is, and now with the aid of the media inflaming both sides, the candidates are posturing to take their best shot for the end game.
The question is, what is Hillary hoping/waiting for – Obama to get the Bird Flu? Or is she waiting?
Yikes, this sounds dark… I guess I don’t trust Hillary very much after watch Bill’s antics — guilt by association. Perhaps I’m watching too many CSI movies.

Posted by: Dr. Obvious | May 8, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

wow, well said STANIAM!!! thats exactly right. he is all words. very slick politician though i must say. when i first saw him speak, i thought wow this guy is gonna be good flesh blood that washington needs. then i did research, and 15 minutes later, my mind was changed.. but that would actually take research, and the ability to look beyond his looks and personality.

Posted by: tim | May 8, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I think Obama put the fix in last night so it would look like Hillary had not won he is a dirty pol.but then every one has read how he won he first seat,in ILL.

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

The only way Obama can win is if Hillary drops out.

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Bishop
absolutely Hillary can still win they are just trying to set us up and move the goal posts it has been and will continue to be the purpose oft he superdelegates and the delegates at the convention to go with the candidate who is better to win regardless of who has the most popular votes or delegates the convention has gotten into a hollywood produced show that looks silly there needs to be real policy debates and discussions etc

Posted by: staniam | May 8, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

staniam you are joking right. Moving the goal posts is cheating.

Posted by: haha | May 8, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

JOE…
well first of all, your friend voting for obama because he simply dosnt like mccain is ridiculous. you still have to look at the big picture. i agree with you, the rev. wright thing may be on the back burner a bit by the time of the general. but believe me, people are not going to forget that when they go to vote!!! you think people just forget or dont care about peoples associations?!?! its not an afterthought. and as far as obama actually beating mccain, thats just ridiculous.. lol
imean, i guess anythings possible, and it dosnt pay to argue about it but he is waaaaay to left to get anybody on the border to go that way. and i think the republicans are a little better at uniting behind a canidate… lol i mean, alot of people dont want mccain as the canidate, me included, but i stand behind him. he is the best i have to vote for and i will support him. and the republican party will do the same thing. there isnt going to be all the drama like you guys have done here… talking about hope and change isnt going to cut it. lol

Posted by: tim | May 8, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

I am ready for a convention fight haven’t seen one since Kennedy and Carter you know Kennedy’s and carter behaved so bad they would not even shake hands we lost to regan our party is always split even on the hill they fight they never join ranks . hillary needs to take this to the floor

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

If you don’t believe in yourself who else can you believe in. I still believe in Hillary.

Posted by: madcat | May 8, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Tim
yea the people that support Obama are in the age where you can buy research papers online you dont have to put in the effort but all the former Obama people I have heard said if they only knew then…

Posted by: staniam | May 8, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Erin,
The problem is Obama keeps saying on the rally and his ads that he never take money from lobbiest.
That is wrong. He lied.
I don’t even care if he did not say it.
The Clinton library is for foundation to help people in the world including Katrina victims and African Children.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 8, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

tim, no way McCain will win. This country is hurting. We need a new direction and McCain can’t do it. You laugh about hope and change but that is what we desperatly need.

Posted by: erin | May 8, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

staniam, how is Obama cheating

Posted by: haha | May 8, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Denny, I think you are on the right track. It is about character and Hillary lacks the kind that our nation needs right now. She is so focused on the power that has lined her family’s pockets to the tune of $millions per year since Bill went into office, that the needs of the American people has been lost. I bet she started off with good intentions, but the system has eaten away at her over the years. I wish that I was wrong because the time is right for a great leader and if it were a woman, it would usher in a new era of American History that could heal our malaise.

Posted by: Dr. Obvious | May 8, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

There’s always a lot of intellectual laziness in these political comments. Tim, if you can’t equate the now over 1000 lies for the war in Iraq by the Bush administration as contributing to the state of our economy (at a cost of over 3.2 trillion), then you are not as balanced as you claim. I happen to be a FISCAL conservative who would have to pay much higher taxes if Bush’s tax cuts were repealed. Most people don’t realize that today, the top 5% of our country pays 60% of the TOTAL tax burden (have a look at the IRS website if interested). Having said that, I will gladly pay those taxes for an INTELLIGENT honest leader with a vision for working together. Yes, Obama scares the hell out of me with his liberal voting record (however don’t trust the “most liberal” rating as these have been highly biased in the past). But isn’t it time to have an honest leader with an IQ north of 80? Why would you want a pair of pathological liars again? Doesn’t anyone remember the bitterness and nastiness during the Clinton years that lead to the voter backlash resulting in the Bush presidency? So what, if Clinton gets in, we’ll have Rush Limbaugh running in 2012 (or Laura Bush)? And McInsane is the epitomy of pandering. I like his candidacy – in 2000! Now he’s just become a flip-flopper with no spine who’s pandering to the Bush presidency for god’s sake!
We have no perfect candidate – certainly no fiscal conservative. Without that choice, I vote for intelligence, honesty, and someone who actually started at the bottom.
I really wish everyone would question what they read or hear more – MSM and intellectual laziness is destroying our country.

Posted by: Brian | May 8, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

In 1968 more young people came out to get envoled in McGovern race this is a repeat .If I remember right most didn’tshow up for the GEneral those of us who did stayed involed in pol.

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

I heard Obama speech lastnight after he won NC.
He sounded like he was the nominee already and said we need to unite.
Now,,he is afraid he can not get Hillary’s supporters votes, I guess.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 8, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

You never know what boneheaded deals a bonehead has done. It may or may not show up again. Even though Bo is immune to his scandals to his supporters who believe in him, the middle class will turn around.

Posted by: tuit | May 8, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Women are great Leaders and this is the perfect time that we need a woman to lead this great nation. Go Hillary fight it to the end. Women always work way harder for whatever that we have. Qualification wise she is well educated,well experienced her heart is clearly into service a blessed with a tight strong family. I pray God will guide you through becoming the next president of the United States.
Obama is a smoking mirror, Good clothes and good talk no substance. America Please wake up go vote for HILLARY

Posted by: ahlene | May 8, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Staniam
You know he would be like Ted Kennedy we never win because the wing nuts always do this . We need to clean out the house on the hill before we can have change but I am not voting for any one who pretends to be something he’s not.

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Hillary is the strongest person the democrats can put up against McCain. Her electability surpasses Obama. Her experience surpasses Obama. Her tenacity surpasses Obama. Her transparency surpasses Obama. Hillary is completely vetted and Obama is STILL being coddled by the mainstream media. Why is the media afraid to be half as tough on Obama as they’ve been on Hillary?! The spin makes medisgusted. Let’s be FAIR!! Hillary is tough and she has every right to stay in this race, and every right to be elected the nominee of the party. RISE HILLARY, RISE!!

Posted by: Jon | May 8, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

One more thing before bedtime.
Staniam, HRC approved of the Florida/Michigan “disenfranchisement” as she likes to call it, while she was ahead in votes. Now that she’s getting her tub thumped, she wants to change the rules she approved. Who’s moving the goalposts?
Tim, my friend is voting against McCain because he doesn’t believe he’s an honorable man. Like I said, I won’t get into the nitty gritty of it. It’s not my style. But there is a Vietnam Veterans website out there that is very critical of him. I wouldn’t be surprised to see him get a little taste of swift boating by some of his own before all’s said and done.
Having said all that, he’s just not going to get elected. Politics in this country follows a definite pendulum swing and I predict it’s about to swing back to the left. People are angry, disillusioned and sick and tired of being hoodwinked in the name of terror. McCain is old and represents old ideas. He’s the archetypical Washington insider. Mark my words, and laugh all you want, this is the year that this country will send a message to D.C. That message will be a young, left of center president who hasn’t been in bed with everyone else in D.C. for years and years. Can he get the job done? Look at it this way. After 911, GWB was literally handed the keys to the car. All he succeeded in doing was running down the battery, draining the gas tank and wrecking the transmission. I believe Obama has the incentive to do better.
Good night from sunny Florida.

Posted by: Joe | May 8, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Ahlene,
Good for you. Thanks.
I do the same. I take my time to pray for her everyday.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 8, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

WHAT is Barack Obama afraid of in Florida and Michigan? WHY didn’t he want them to have a chance to vote in a primary? How can he even think of asking for the FLORIDA votes in November when he wouldn’t allow their votes to be counted now, or allow a revote or anything else that would have made Florida’s choice count. Hillary would win??! Hillary would’ve had more momentum?! WHATEVER reason he had, he will be sorry should he become the nominee eventually!

Posted by: Jon | May 8, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Fl favors Hillary strong middle age to sen, women who love Bill and Hill. He better hope McCain doesn’t pik Mitt or MI is a no go for him,

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

I agree

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Stanium..I don’t care which one of the clowns makes it. They are all a bunch of liars.
If you haven’t figured out you have been lied to incessantly by the Clinton’s, and Bush, then you are the fool.
They spend our money and don’t pay the bills. They lie to us about having a budget surplus….and paying down the debt.
Our country is bankrupt! Dipsticks that can’t figure this, out are the ones that amuse me. Do you really believe that any of these idiots are going to change anything? Give me a break.
516 Trillion dollars of dirivatives being sold by Chelsea Clinton ought to just thrill you also. She makes good money selling the garbage.
The only problem is….The world only produces 60 Trillion dollars of goods a year.
Did any of you ever question how banks can be losing billions of dollars? It’s because of these dirivatives. Bets on debt.
Our country is finacially insolvent. Who cares which idiot runs it? They will just take the blame for the mess.

Posted by: Steven Wilson | May 8, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

“It’s not over until it’s over.”

Posted by: Fredric Fortney | May 8, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

“It’s not over until it’s over.”

Posted by: Fredric Fortney | May 8, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

What would you think when there is a guy coming out of nowhere telling you that you should end the election because it is bad for the party?
Does it mean that your vote shouldn’t be counted and your voice shouldn’t be heard?
This is from the superdelegate ‘Joe Andrew’. The superdelegate who tries to fix the election rather than letting the people vote.
These are supporters of OBAMA; a bunch of crab crawling for the party against the people.
Counting the odds that our girl Hillary has been against, she has done an exceptional job and showed exceptional courage and commitment where empty suit couldn’t match.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 8, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

Hillary has done us a great service.
Without her, how do we know what a scumbag that the party wants to stick under our throat. She even used her money to tell us that the empty suit connecting to lunatics is nothing but a fraud.
Thank you Hillary. Support you all the way.
Hillary or McCain, Never OBAMA.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 8, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am

Where was Hillary Clinton’s outrage about Florida and Michigan not counting – BEFORE the primaries and caucuses began? In fact, I understand she signed a pledge not to campaign there and to take her name off the ballot.
Hillary Clinton knew the rules of this before this race and accepted them. She broke her pledge.
It is Barack Obama who has played by the rules, not Hillary Clinton.
I understand that the people of Florida and Michigan are upset that their votes have not counted, but their anger should not be directed at Barack Obama or his campaign. It should be directed at the state legislatures of both states who moved the primaries up in violation of party rules.
For Hillary Clinton to claim now – after the fact – that her pledge didn’t mean anything – is not valid…

Posted by: Julie | May 8, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

what a bunch of women! LOL.

Posted by: unleashed | May 8, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Hillary Clinton—-The female version of the Pied Piper.She is being out spent because her campaign has no appeal.Imagine the economic expert who cannot even run a simple campaign,and has to beg for 5 dollar donations.Sooooo sad!!!!

Posted by: michelle | May 8, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Hey michelle don’t sweat it girl,she can continue the Bill and Bush policy by selling our country to China.

Posted by: marlon | May 8, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

I’m really sick of Obama and especially his ill-behaving supporters. Through out this whole friggen race, all you do is kick Hillary even when she’s down. You don’t deserve our supports. I will never vote for Obama.

Posted by: Sammie | May 9, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I bet every Hillary supporter on this board has a hateful story done to tehm by an obama supporter! If their is anyone on the boards right now tell your story! Let these people know you mean business!

Posted by: Not playin any more! | May 9, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

We go to visibility events for our candidate, we get spit on, we get cursed with the most horrible curses. We have people come on to our pro-Hillary sites and they try to find out personal info on us and then try to find us, some end up being stalked. They have slashed our tires, called our candidate all kinds of names as well as us. Just look at the posts above. Vile, childish and rude! This is the unity obama has brought to our party! God Bless us all. I came on here to read an article and saw that silly will’s post and had to comment!

Posted by: Not playin any more! | May 9, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.