By Dotcomabc

May 2, 2008 9:59pm

Clinton Says She Is ‘No Shrinking Violet’ Amid Cheers for Obama

ABC News’ Eloise Harper and Sunlen Miller reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., had to endure cheers for Sen. Barack Obama and boos for the North Carolina governor, who has backed her, at the North Carolina Democratic Party’s Jefferson-Jackson dinner in Raleigh, N.C., Friday evening — where both she and Obama spoke.

Toward the end of her speech, Clinton pointed out to the crowd that she thinks she is tough, saying to the crowd, “I am no shrinking violet.”

Clinton, attempting to show that there will be party unity, said, “If Sen. Obama is the nominee, you better believe I’ll work my heart out for him.”

The crowd erupted into a chant for Obama, leaving Clinton speechless for a few seconds while she waited for them to finish. During her speech, Clinton also mentioned Gov. Mike Easley, who has endorsed her candidacy, and she was momentarily rendered speechless while the crowd booed him.

In his speech, Obama also preached unity, saying that after the nomination process is over, “This party will come together. If Hillary Clinton were the nominee, I would support her in a heartbeat. And I know that if I am the nominee then she will support me.”

But he again criticized Clinton over her support of a national gas tax holiday, suggesting that Clinton is not being honest with the American people about the real savings they would receive under the proposal she backs along with Sen. John McCain, the likely Republican presidential nominee.

"For us to suggest that 30 cents a day for three months is real relief, that that’s a real energy policy, means that we are not tackling the problem that has to be tackled," Obama said. "We are offering gimmicks. When we are offering the same thing that John McCain is offering on the cheap, that means that we’re not presenting a truthful response to the challenges that we face in America.”

Both Democrats also had some words to say about former Sen. John Edwards in his home state.

“Let me say what a great fighter North Carolina and working Americans everywhere have in John Edwards," Clinton said. "John ran with compassion and conviction. And his courageous fight to end poverty is a fight I will see to the finish. I will appoint a cabinet-level position that will be solely and fully devoted to ending poverty as we know it in America. So let¹s take a minute to express our gratitude to your former senator and a great American, John Edwards."

Clinton then pointed out that Edwards’ wife, Elizabeth, supports her health-care plan.

“I want to thank Elizabeth Edwards for her passion for ending discrimination by the insurance companies and for standing up against John McCain’s inadequate and radical health-care plan," she said. "Elizabeth Edwards is a true champion for universal health care.”

Obama also gave a shout out to the Edwards’ on their home turf.

“I say a special thanks to John and Elizabeth Edwards because they really set the tone for this presidential race with their courage, with their ideas, with their passion and their commitment to working people," Obama said, "and to making sure that we focus our attention on not just the ‘haves,’ not even the ‘have littles and want mores,’ but the ‘have nots’ in America.”

Obama said he is grateful for the Edwards’ contributions and looks forward to working with them in the next administration.

User Comments

Wow! Democratic Party Dinner! I knew Obama had the support of the Party in NC,. but I would have never expected this.

Posted by: Thinking | May 2, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Again. Obama would never give a speech in front of a bunch of Clinton supporters. This is the third speech she has given in front of Obama supporters.
Arent Obama supporters swell? Their way or the highway. But then again, moveon.org and huffington post are going to HANG themselves over Clinton going on Oreilly.
After all these months of utter hatred from the far left wing, how dare Clinton give them the finger (finally).
Chris matthews now thinks fox is in a vast conspiracy with Clinton to harass his beloved Obama.
Has anyone asked Obama if he believes in black liberation theology yet?
Oh i forgot. Thats one of the swift boats they are saving for the general election. One of the many.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 2, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Typical Obama supporters. Booing fellow democrats. Hope, change, unity – Obama’s new washington is on its way to town. Do not dare to question the messiah of unity, or you will be booed.

Posted by: rs | May 2, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Sounds like the BO people have put people out there to cheer on BO and jeer Hillary just like in the debates but it doesn’t matter because the people that are not there don’t care which is 98% of the people outside of me that pay attention. I talk to people all the time and they are clueless because they don’t blog or pay attention to the news channels.

Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 2, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Experience would count if it was all doing things that she said she done,,,She likes to play and hear herself talk big like she was in the middle of these things. ONLY if they are good thing if bad she opposed them.

Posted by: H | May 2, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Maybe Hillary has burned some bridges?
I wouldn’t have thought thy would booo her like that, but one never knows.

Posted by: Thinking | May 2, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

And you know … I would rather Barack Obama not go to Fox. I HIGHLY doubt he would get maybe 1 vote out a million by doing so.
One vote is not worth fighting with old Hatchman Hannity. I listen to this guy’s radio show during the day in awe of his far reaching witch hunt. He repeats this long laundry list of mindless garbage and then brings in one of his minions to agree with him. And his audience is feeding off that crap.
A shame people cant think for themselves

Posted by: Omentum | May 2, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

I watched her speech on C-span tonight. She was terrific and what I saw were people cheering her with signs and shouting her name. ABC is so biased its pathetic!!! Shame on you!! Go Hillary go!!
Hillary in 2008!!

Posted by: Paulabeth | May 2, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

The reaction of the crowd at this event is reminiscent of the behavior of Senator Obama’s supporters when I attended the Democratic caucus here in Texas to support Senator Clinton.
For those of you who found the behavior of the crowd at this event humorous, you exemplify the image people around the world have of Americans as rude and obnoxious people.
Much to our discredit, social grace appears to be all but dead in this country.

Posted by: TexasLJ | May 2, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Georgia,
Don’t you find it starnge that Clinton doesn’t appeal to the other half of the Democratic Party?
I think it is a matter of half of us not listening to the other half.
Thanks for your input but I voted Obama

Posted by: Thinking | May 2, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

s.b. people have been booing and demonstrating about what they believe in for many, many years…..the wars, abortion, etc. They are not behaving like children. They have the maturity to speak up for what they believe. And it’s call freedom of speech.

Posted by: lisa | May 2, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

rs, don’t you find it more than a little odd that the chanters of HOPE, CHANGE, UNITY, don’t really convey it to the other half of the Party. That should tell us that it is all about theatrics or make believe. Grab your soundbites and go for it. If you say it often enough, it becomes theology and truth. Until everyone discovers the emptiness beneath. Bring out Deval Patrick again, because I liked his delivery better. Words….just words….We hold these words to be self evident….that “you can fool some people some of the time; you can fool all of the people some of the time, but, you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.” Sooner or later, “the chickens come home to roost!” Was that what Rev. Wright was preaching? Pray tell us some more about black liberation theology, maybe we could be converted.

Posted by: georgia | May 2, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Mathematically, Hillary can’t win. Seems pretty cut and dried at this point. So I’m confused what you Hillary people are so exercised about… Seems like there’s a failure to deal with reality going on here…

Posted by: mg | May 2, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Freedom of speech does not mean that a mature adult abandons diplomacy or common courtesy. All the booing, snipes, snarks, and nastiness define the character of the people demonstrating the bad behavior, not the democratic party. Disrespectful behavior is NOT what the democratic party has traditionally been about, at least not since Obama advanced his big change.

Posted by: Emily | May 2, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

peter
You are way off. Clinton didn’t do crap.

Posted by: Omentum | May 2, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Emily
Oh do I her crying…
Negativity loves company. And just so happened Queen Negativity was at the podium…

Posted by: Omentum | May 2, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Peter, AA should not vote Hillary because they feel obligated to Bill. People need to vote on who they think the best canidate should be. What I really want to say would be deleted so I will just leave it as this.

Posted by: lisa | May 2, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

@ peter:
I’m beginning to believe you may be right. Both Bill and Hillary Clinton devoted years to advancing the rights of African Americans, Hispanics, woman, and so many others. Suddenly now, the Obama camp brands them as racists. Methinks it’s projection.

Posted by: Emily | May 2, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

hillary is the next prez of the united states of america. she has shown integrity, grit, toughness, strength, fortitude, and will to keep going, and to face o’reilly on fox. stephonopolus should be an easy piece of cake for her. she can sure chew ‘em up and spit ‘em out when she has to. she is one tough lady.
and then there’s obama. stutters and stammers over the rev wright. if he cannot stand up and control an insane pastor, how can he stand up to and control alquieda?

Posted by: carlasue | May 2, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Oh Emily, please. This is called demonstrating and it has been going on way before Obama. So stop blaming him for the disruptions.

Posted by: lisa | May 2, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

I belive in the Constitution.
I believe in honesty.
I believe our government is full of vile self indulgent individuals.
I believe our time is now.
I belive our future is in OUR OWN HANDS.
I believe HRC and McCain are part of the past.
I believe anything is possible.
I believe that my fellow humans are capable of seeing and believing what is obvious.
Obama 08

Posted by: Bud | May 2, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Thinking, I’m glad you got my point. After Obama supporters have called for Hillary to get out of the race continually, called her all kinds of unflattering names, then they can be totally disrespectful and boo her and the Governor at a Democratic Party dinner in Raleigh, what should we think? That the Obama people own the Party? That this is not a campaign where all voices can be heard with respect? Some people need to grow up. I am glad that you voted Obama, because I didn’t, and I won’t in November. Enjoy your moment while you can!

Posted by: georgia | May 2, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

george, people do read more than one paragraph…as we are voting for our future leader of the USA. it is beholding to us all as we persue our choice. after all, freedom in all categories is what this election is all about. i am intrigued by these posts and respect all views of the bloggers. i may not agree with them, i may spar with them, but i respect them.
hillary is the candidate that represents the middle class blue collar worker. i want her to win as a lot of us do…..the indy star said today, ‘she has a clear-eyed focus on the issues in this country.’ and they are right…she does. when will obama spar with o’rielly on fox and show the country he can take on a right wing idiot like hillary did…..she did it with ease, and o’rielly respects and admires her for her class. talk about reaching across party lines.

Posted by: carlasue | May 2, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

When the polls drop, bring on the race-baiting, name calling, and ad hominine attacks on Hillary, and her supporters.
@ lisa: The “disruptions,” as you call them, have been encouraged by the Obama camp from day one. These disruptions are discourteous, mean-spirited, and downright rude. They are also not representative of the democratic party or anyone with dignity.

Posted by: Emily | May 2, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

She needs to shrink and go away.

Posted by: antenian | May 2, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Emily – Much like the words “disruption” and distraction” have been used by political candidates…so have the words “hope” and “change”. Meanwhile, we have the Revvy Wright, Tony Ayers, Mr. Auchi, cousin Odinga, and many others. Your candidate is a liar.

Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 2, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

also, i would like to comment, does everyone remember when hillary was the front runner for so long…..and the attack ads were all against her, and everyone was looking for every little thing, past, present and future wrong so they could media blast her? maybe now obama knows how hillary feels and understands what she went through for so long.

Posted by: carlasue | May 2, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Some sure are reaching for bloodlines and affiliations to discredit Obama.
The Clinton past is rather deep, and quite frankly, unresolved. The MSM won’t touch it *yet*. They are saving up for mainstream media ratings, shall we go there now and give them a head start?
Don’t assume your HRC is resilient. you can’t even understand media- and give HRC and her husband more credit then they deserve.
Kinda like buying a Hummer- you might think you look cool, but most of us just think you are a fool.

Posted by: Bud | May 2, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

bud, like being with the rev. wright for 20 years was ‘cool’ but now a ‘fool.’

Posted by: carlasue | May 2, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Erin – When did I discuss race? I was talking about relationships between countries in our world. Your candidate supported his cousin who wants to make Kenya subject to Muslim law.

Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 2, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

georgia
If clinton, the inevitable candidate, was leading with a unsurpassable pledge delegate, a highly probable unpassable lead in popular vote, double the number of states won, and obama was in her position, there would be the LOUDEST CRY of contempt against obama. i believe Dean, Gore, the Clintons, all three branches of government, FOX, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, LIFETIME CHANNEL, ESPN, NICK, DISNEY AND everyone else would be demanding he concede.
But since its Hillary, hey we need to let the people voices be heard…. obama need more vetting (more like witch hunting). She been moving the goal post all over the field.. first there was popular vote, then there was big states, then there was electoral states, then there just now electability….. when will it end….
let the double standards continue

Posted by: Omentum | May 2, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

the woman is fearless! while obama will not even debate her. way to go hillary bet they expected you to go into a fetal position like obama after the abc debate.

Posted by: sonia trevino | May 2, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

DcVoter-
I am capable of reasonable debates. I won’t even use insults as points. What shall we debate in front of our fine audience? We can address this one question at a time, or numerous, the choice is yours. I am an intelligent Independent voter for Obama, so I welcome your response.

Posted by: Bud | May 2, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Obama has such a boatload of dirty friends……drip…drip if that boat springs a leak…watch out. Look at Rezko on trial right now. Rezko, as a real estate magnate in Chicago, was given a contract for 3 energy plants to be built in Iraq…. through our government. The plants were never built because Rezko got indicted, but NO DOUBT that Senator Obama helped Rezko GET that contract for Rezko. Not to mention that Axelrod was a lobbyist for Exelon (and the later nuclear legislation with no teeth), or that much of the $$$ loans came through General Electric Financial. Who have been large contributors to Obama’s campaigns, General Electric and Exelon! Who owns one of the largest loan insurance and credit card companies in America, General Electric. Who voted for unlimited credit limits and voted against a 30% cap on credit cards? Obama! Obama said he voted against the 30% cap because it was too high. Apparently NO cap is better than a cap that’s too high. Who owns NBC and MSNBC the home of all anti-Hillary all the time? General Electric! Who owns Chris Matthews, Tim Russert, Keith Olbermann and Andrea Mitchell? General Electric! Do you think Obama made a speech against the war in Iraq because of his own personal ideology? Which company is doing business in Iran right now? General Electric! No wonder Obama wants to sit down with Ahmedinajad. Why are the Obamanations booing Hillary? They should be booing their liberal fascist leader!

Posted by: rs | May 2, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

DCVoter, Even Rev. Wright said that Obama was a politician, while he (Wright) was a pastor. He said that Obama would say what he needed to say because he was a “politician”. Wright said that he as a pastor answers to God. I probably fall in with the 58%, however, let us “think” a little harder. Perhaps, they planned this whole charade. Wright would make a speech at the National Press Club and respeak his hate rantings. Then, Obama could have a speech for the national media to “act” like he was outraged and denounce Wright. Then, the media and the voters will see that the slate is wiped clean–no more talk about Wright–no more awful baggage for Obama. Did they both “wink” as they played their parts to perfection? Great “thinking” on your part, DC, and mine, too!

Posted by: georgia | May 2, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Wow- the mainstream media fed posts are abundant here, kinda scary. Does anyone posting on this site do their *OWN* research?
Guess that’s toomuch to ask of folks in the information age-
ROFL……..

Posted by: Bud | May 2, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

When Jesse Jackson ran in 1988 all the way to the convention supposedly promoting a party split along racial lines, no one asked him to step out of the race. In fact, he was heralded for his effort. No one has ever asked any candidate to withdraw from a race in the history of the party. Dean sets a dangerous precedent that could lead to a party split by stating one of the candidates should withdraw in June. Any voter who suggests Clinton should withdraw exhibits misogynistic behavior and bias against the only viable female presidential candidate in history. Leahy and Dean have both published anti-Clinton statements prior to this race for the nomination. The bias of the leadership in the DNC is clear. It is up to the voters to rebut their efforts as true Americans and supporters of democratic processes.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 2, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

omentum, can you please explain to me and 90 % of the rest of these people on this blog, and if fact across america, why obama should be president? how can you convince me and so many others by one sitting in a pew for 20 years and being brainwashed is suddenly unwelcome, or denounced. what do you think of the wright’s comment….he is doing what politicians do…..what do you think of rattso…..what do you think of ayers….what do you think of the nbpp…….above all else,what do you think of obama subjecting his children to these kind of ‘hate’ sermons for so long…..well???

Posted by: carlasue | May 2, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

bud, obama’s hate cult is REALLY a part of the past…..we do not need racism in the WH

Posted by: carlasue | May 2, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

whenever Hillary or Bill Clinton have rally , Obama campaign always send some hecklers.
That is childish.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 2, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Of course Obama or one of his “superdelegate” spokespersons – oh why not Claire McCaskill, she’s so intelligent, “I’m voting for Obama because my teenager told me to” – will come out tomorrow and say that they do not endorse or encourgage rude behavior on the part of Obama supporters towards the other Democratic candidate – who should get out of the race NOW! Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi must be so proud.
Hillary 08!

Posted by: frisco girl | May 2, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

omentum….sorry, i clearly disagree….let us pretend for one minute that hillary supports the KKK, hagee, racism, wright, rattso. OMG there would be a media explosion that would be felt to japan. let’s be real please.

Posted by: carlasue | May 2, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Funny thing,
i was looking at the demconblog and noticed that superdelegates always switch from clinton to obama and never from obama to clinton…
WONDER WHYYYYYY hmmmmmm……… when the ship is sinking……..well… you know

Posted by: Omentum | May 2, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Nah. It’s just rock politics. Try playing to a crowd of Bruuuuuucccee fans. And it’s Southern politics. Welcome to the revival. True believers get rowdy.
The Republicans are already running ads here in Alabama using Obama to beat the local Democrats. This isn’t just Hillary’s campaign anymore. A lot of Democratic candidates are tied to the Obama train wreck in progress.

Posted by: len | May 2, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

If Obama gets the nomination, I will completely disown the democratic party despite being one my whole life. The democratic party is unrealistic, it wins when it nominates a moderate candidate. Gore, Edwards, Clinton could have won, but Obama is too left and his associations are scary. I will not only vote for McCain but I will give money and campaign for him as well. The alternative is disaster. Sorry. I bet a good chunk of Clinton supporters may also vote McCain and may also completely abandon the party. Clinton supporters- moderate, conservative, working class dems– we should form a new party and call it the realists and get away from the radical left of our party. We deserve better. Finally, I would rather be a republican than vote Obama democratic. I cannot believe I am saying this but it is the truth. The DNC and head in the sand party leaders can have the party and see how well they do without the moderate branch of the party.

Posted by: texasdemocrat | May 2, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

thank you dc voter and erik for the information. i value posts that contain cited information that is verifiable. that shows that the poster is informed, beyond just spewing hate and opinion.

Posted by: sonia trevino | May 2, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

omentum, our ship is not sinking….not in any way shape or form. how is obama’s arc doing after the rev wright, rattso, ayers, the rest of the snake oil politicians…..

Posted by: carlasue | May 2, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

@ DCVoter: EXCELLENT post!

Posted by: Emily | May 2, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

When who runs this country is based on electability aside from what is right- that says enough.
My granpa who served in Vietnam cries when he watches the political process. He sees what those men in women in Iraq are dying for- oil. NONE of us voted for BUSH and his policy. NONE of us are fools. My granfather deserves respect, and for all of his years on this planet and his time served, I respect his opinion ABOVE ALL ELSE>
Obama is the right candidate. ON foreigh relations, on future economy and on how to treat our veterans.
Aside from my 34 year old opinion, I regasrd my granpa’s opinion above all news media.
AND I ALWAYS WILL. If you haven’t been to Vietnam- spare me.

Posted by: Bud | May 2, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

omentum, do you mean to tell me that the rev wright’s comments toward america, patriotism, racism, ‘were not as severe’ as those of the kkk. wow….i despise everything there is to do with hate and racism and un-americanism. i believe in freedom of speech, freedom of choice, and all the other blessings our constitution gives us. the rev wright tainted my feelings on obama when obama did not act when he should have.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Texasdeom
you are right he may well win the nomination … but like Hillary says the best candidate will win and shes the best candidate but we will band together to elect Mccain if Obama with his multiple faults and associations is nominated he cant win the GE in his own right anyway!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

did you not get the memo …. wright is on hillary boat…. since an enthusiastic hillary supporter invited him to the press club….. Thanks …. you gave barack obama another opportunity to show he is a statesman and able to react properly in a tough situation….
Not like your girl hillary… I can still remember here complaining in the debates asking the moderators to get obama a pillow and in ohio ranting “shame on you obama” what a whackjob… and you want that in the oval office making global decisions.

Posted by: Omentum | May 3, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

did anyone read the article? The crowd was not booing clinton, they were booing the GOVERNOR, geez’ read.

Posted by: rizabove | May 3, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

thank you staniam.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Wasn’t it a major Clinton Supporter who arranged that Wright spectacle? UMMM>>>>> YES! WOW- what a pop quiz… as I tell my grampy what i type, he says’
“you tell them”
“they think about now, no research, not what the history books will say 40 years from now, people are so foolish”
AGREED.

Posted by: Bud | May 3, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

@ Obama supporters whoever said boo is not childish but freedom of speech.
If they don’t like whatever Hillary said at that rally why don’t they just leave rather than interrupting.
Nobody force them to stay and listen to her.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 3, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Carolyn Morwickc:
What Experience?

Posted by: reaganfan | May 3, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

The handwriting is on the Wall!
Time to Go Home Hillary and take
Bill with You!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 3, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

bud, i read your post on your father’s service. god bless you, as my late father served in the korean war, met general mcarthur, and saw a lot of death and destruction. i heard his truths and stories, i couldn’t believe it upon hearing it. i may disagree with your choice of a politician, but here’s to you and your father, and mine.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

rizabove
Gov Easley is sortof a stiff but that means hes tough and wont listen to the Obamanation! Obama has not won one major state that every candidate has to win in the GE

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Emily 11:01:10 pm,
I agree with you.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 3, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Hey Omentum..Perhaps what CarlaSue meant is that under an Obama presidency, it may become politcially correct to do so. The BO campaign makes people believe that things could “change”. It’s not BO so much…..it’s his supporters.

Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 3, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

omentum, no i don’t need a history lesson thank you. but racism leads to violence, hate, murder, and i don’t care what color on color, murder is murder, hate is hate, and we all need to start thinking for the better interest of the HUMAN race….thank you

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Bud
THe National Press Club Pres said it was not a CLinton supporter who arranged the speech and furthermore that doctored video about the 92 Clinton war room is inaccurate Pres Clinton did not use expletives in the real meeting I remember it most of you where like 2 then!

Posted by: Staniam | May 3, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Omentum
but at least hes respected and has a little thing called experience since hes served two terms as governor

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

carlasue rev wright was preaching about the injustices in America done to minorities. He said many blacks did not feel like singing God bless America… Wright’s message is far a man who lived through jim crow, voter and civil rights…he never got over the injustices obviously and is still angry because of the wrongs committed, but obama didn’t grow up during that era, all of us have parents and grandparents who lived through that era and they tell their stories and triumphs… Some still mad like wright, but we still hear it…Obama dowsn’t feel the same way…that is a big well known southside chicago church, it’s a buppy church not a cult or compound, he isn’t brainwashed, get over it. I say just vote for whomever you like, that we can do.

Posted by: rizabove | May 3, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

rizabove, then let’s rise above as you say. why should we uphold the rev’s comments as we know them……if i made those statements on this blog, i would have a lynch mob after me, i don’t care what color i am. or what color the rev wright is. hate is hate…racism is racism…..injustice to one is injustice to all…..together we stand…..

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

TJ
since the Jefferson-Jackson Dinners are DNC functions its no surprise… DR Dean was comlianing about a lack of money at the DNC (I know I refused to renew my mombership) because of their mistakes

Posted by: Staniam | May 3, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

DcVoter,
Very good comment.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 3, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Obama supporters bash folks who disagree with their liberal philosphy.
Obama supporters BOO anyone who doesnt think like they do.
You guys think Obama has it tough right now? How about when Fox gets around to asking him about black libertarian philosophy?
his church has been practicing it for long before Obama got there.
How does he say he doesnt believe in it nor the ‘black value system’ but went to the church?
He doesnt. Hannity went and got experts, other black preachers to discuss it and trinity church.
All they have to do is tie in the philosophy to the church and Obama is toast for sure this time.
Whats Obama going to say to that? He wasnt in the pews at all? He never read the manifesto? He didnt know the black value system?

Posted by: tomdavie | May 3, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Another reason not to vote for Obama. So many of his supporters are childish and classless. No Hillary, then GO McCain!

Posted by: AK | May 3, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I really think Clinton can win the nomination. If she does not though, I will take my money and my vote elsewhere. I hear Obama supporters saying all the time what they will do if he does not get the nomination. Unfortunately, they really have nowhere to go. They are the left. I really do not want to be left to voting for McCain. I like Clinton, but also could have easily voted Gore, Edwards, etc. I voted for John Kerry, Al Gore, and Bill Clinton twice proudly. I can and will not vote for Obama. This is a sad fact that the DNC fails to recognize. It is absolutely not a threat. I do not feel extremely fanatical about Clinton, I just cannot vote for Obama. Finally, Clinton has gotten some of the worst press and sexist stuff too. I read one article somewhere that said she was “pimping Chelsea”. This is just crude, and I am tired of the behavior of the press–getting away with behavior like that and so much more. The DNC is really silly if they buy into all this. Sorry it is the truth. They say hindisght is 20/20 but some in the party are trying to warn you ahead of time of the disaster looming ahead.

Posted by: texasdemocrat | May 3, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

stanium who says Ohio and Pennsylvania are that important? Hillary grew up in Penn. Have you been to Ohio? It’s more like the deep south. Obama will win New York and California…always strong dem states duh. He will win period if he gets the nomination and Hillary will help him… Read the article again.

Posted by: rizabove | May 3, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

clinton should win the nom!!! can anyone else comment with me about the o’reilly interview on fox. yes i don’t like the right-wing crap on fox, and yes, oreilly is the worst of the worst of right-wing journalists, but wow, did hillary stun him….he looked like the perverbial ‘deer in the headlights’ after the interview….can anyone else do that….

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

thx Emily et al
staniam – she already holds the lead in popular votes because the elections in FL and MI were certified. I agree her lead will likely increase. Many voters do not understand the nomination process and the electoral process. The seasoned unpledged delegates (SD’s) understand it well hence the reason they have not endorsed. As you well know, in a nutshell, the voters provide them with a guideline by which to cast their vote at the DNCC. While the race is about delegates, SD’s are delegates too and they will consider the popular vote of all the states and territories as well as electoral power.
When the race is not close, their votes on behalf of the party do not matter. This year, the voters are unable to give either nominee half the available pledged delegates so it does matter. As WJC stated, SD’s have a job to do on behalf of the party in the interest of the voters who support their candidates and it is a tough one. Ultimately, as Dean stated, it comes down to electability and perception of momentum in these remaining races. For those who are unclear, let’s review how the nomination race works:
Number of states won – irrelevant to electability because more than half the states are red (most of Obama’s red state wins are irrelevant in the GE)
Number of blue and swing states won – relevant in terms of electoral power (Clinton has already surpassed the 270 electoral vote mark and Obama cannot possibly attain it)
Popular vote – relevant in terms of the GE race popularity/momentum (Clinton leads and the lead is likely to grow)
Demographic vote – relevant in terms of GE electoral power (Clinton has a broader appeal)
In November, 270 electors are needed to win the Presidency. In summary, Clinton’s electoral power of 286 electors to Obama’s 208 electors is the reason she is considered the most electable by many experts in the party as well as the voters per the polls.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

@DCVoter: Always good to see your posts, but the picture you paint is overly optimistic and is based on data that do not transfer to the general election. Either democratic candidate would have a good chance against McCain and the ‘electability’ argument only matters the day after the second tuesday in November.

Posted by: MIguy | May 3, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

i must say this, and i am proud to…..just a week and a half ago, i was on a flight from st louis to kc and had the priveledge of sitting next to claire mccaskillels mother. i had no idea who she was when i sat next to her. i just saw an elderly lady who seemed alert and with it. we started talking, and she was talking to the gentlemen who was also sitting with us….and i will admit….and admire….what a wonderful lady to have kept company with on a one hour flight. even tho she expressed her opinion for obama, and i for hillary, when i got off the plane before her, and i had to bend down in front of her to get my carry on as i sat near the bulk head of the plane, i smiled at her, and she winked at me. what a lady of class and grandeure. yes, i am a hillary supporter, but i do respect ms mccaskill for showing such class and dignity toward me, even tho we support opposing candidates…but the candidate we support are playing on the same team…….think about it!

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

hey bud….thanks for the post. yes we agree to disagree….but from one dog lover to another, from one father’s war hero to another, from one democrat to another…..we need to stand united. we need to put hate in it’s place….it has NO PLACE for the human race…..god bless all of us.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

MIguy – good to see yours also. Electability is an argument that is viable because it is the party’s position that they support either candidate but they must select the most electable for a chance to win. As you correctly stated before – nominees are selected not elected under the current process. Whether you or I like it or not, the SD’s will decide based on that electability. Currently, there are only a handful of superdelegates who have publicly committed to casting their vote for the candidate with the most pledged delegates.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Of course Clinton will help Obama. She is a democrat.
I will vote for Mc Cain, and if he cant make his case to me, then I will write hillarys name on the ballot.
I will not vote for Obama out of pure concience. He is a fine man, but ran before he was ready and has too many dubious relationships that are too radical left.
Once he gets some experience in the senate, and ditches his left wing philosophy and moves to the center, he will surely win the presidency.
We clinton supporters will be Obama supporters surely one day. But he isnt ready and its not responsible to elect him.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 3, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Funny, even my grandpa says that the media, governments and pundints are the only ones who haven’t realized that the bottom line in america has shifted. The media keeps putting left against right, and they don’t even understand where the fulcrum is.
It is an exciting and very frustrating time to attempt to challenge news and politics. The rules have changed, so have the guidelines, as well as beliefs.
Right, liberal, left, conservative- ALL HOLD NEW meaning this day in age, and majority of us are guilty of letting the old asses and media control the meaning of them all.
Shame on all of us.

Posted by: Bud | May 3, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

MIguy, i don’t pay attention to the polls either…..too many of them, and too confusing. what a waste of time. you could bounce from one news channel to another, and find vast differences in ‘poll’s…. let’s just find out the real deal on tues.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

DCvoter
Thats right it has been reported that the superdelegates especially members of congress will waiit till after the primaries because they want the most electable candidate and the MSM tries to spin it the other way they are affraid of allienating the youth and african american advertising base I say just let forget about them it shouldnt be based on money

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

@DCVoter: No argument – I agree that the superdelegates can choose whomever they want based on whatever criteria they desire. I just personally believe that either Senator Clintor or Obama can be ‘electable’ in November.

Posted by: MIguy | May 3, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

jj….think we just showed up on a UFO? This is American conversation. Believe it or not, there are those who don’t support your candidate and never will. We need him like we needed Benedict Arnold.

Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 3, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

darn right staniam and dc. let us hear the voice of the whole nation. don’t cut us short.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

It is crystal clear that OBAMA fanatics aim at silencing peoples and do not respect the freedom of speech and the principles of democracy.
These activists are extremists and dangerous.
They aim to idolize a human who is frequently at fault. The party is biased and is afraid to have voices of people heard and votes of poeple count.
NEVER OBAMA.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 3, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Booing while Senator Clinton was speaking? I’m proud that they WEREN’T on her side, with behavior like that! Whether or not you agree with what candidates say, booing is just plain rude…

Posted by: april | May 3, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

While I believe either Democrat is electable- the new voters who believe we can start to change the Washington bigots will be disenfranchised if Clinton is the nominee. Any long standing politician who can change rules mid game and get elected, well, it pretty much sums up politics for the last….. ummm…. 50 years. Nothing new about that, and nothing will change is she is elected. No need to argue, I’ll meet you on the blog 4 years from now with a big fat ” I told you so.”

Posted by: Bud | May 3, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

@carla sue: i’m a big fan of letting voters decide things. i wish more would show up at the polls in general.
@ruthmatters: i humbly disagree about the gas tax ‘holiday’. it is, at its essence, akin to giving a heroin addict another hit. yeah, i’m bleeding at the pump too but what you noted is that a lower price would cause increased demand, followed by tighter supply, and higher prices. it’s a zero-sum game for motorists but benefits big oil companies by shifting money that would repair our roads to their coffers.

Posted by: MIguy | May 3, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

The pollsters have been embarassed into improving their polling methods. Per the latest assessment, 36 of 39 polls correctly predicted the PA win within the margin of error.
I will quantify that either candidate for the democrats has a chance to beat McCain in Nov if and only if the party unifies the voters behind the nominee. Since that is outside the control of the party, the question SD’s are faced with is not whether either candidate can beat McCain but rather which candidate is more likely to beat McCain without a unified party. This is why I agree with the former leaders who sent a jointly endorsed letter to the SD’s that Clinton currently has the broader appeal and the greatest electoral power based on the voting results and the current polling trends. If there is one thing Dean got right is that it will come down to electability and current perception from the remaining races not the popular vote or the delegate count because those are opposing numbers. Remember, the DNC messed up by spreading the contests out too fair which resulted in early snapshots that do not agree with the latest ones. The party wants to win and either candidate will support whomever the party nominates. But the party knows it cannot control who the voters support.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

carlasue, I don’t agree with wright but understand his bitterness. He does need to forgive and move on, but he wasn’t saying he hated whites, he was saying America had been injury to it’s people, do you think that is an untrue statement? I personally think during my lifetime things have changed and gotten much better, people have more of a mutual respect, but all have to try to come together even more. We cannot be held accountable for how our relatives feel or how our pastors feel, we have to embrace everybody forgive and move forward. Obama made a decision to split from his pastor b/c he doesn’t seem willing to forgive and move forward, but obama’s message is clear, he wants unity. Obama has seen the best and the worst of both worlds, he’s not perfect but he’s trying to get everyone motivated and engaged.

Posted by: rizabove | May 3, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

MIGuy…there are a lot Lot LOT more Clinton people jumping ship if it’s Obama. This election showed me that parties are something contrived by the masses that mean nothing. As a Democrat, never realized how much I am in the center until BO showed up. I’ll be torn between dem and rep for life unless the Dems support their core.

Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 3, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

And why should anyone be surprised when a speech given by Hillary Clinton in front of Obama supporters receives the same greeting that it would if it was being given in Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity Church?
Obama can speak with her in front of a biased crowd, but he doesn’t have the testicular fortitude to debate her.
Spineless…

Posted by: Jayhawk | May 3, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Bud
nope in 2006 democrats including Obama(2004) were brought into change things right away so they becaome part of the problem dont blame Hillary sympathizers for the war etc like the young people deserve to be drafted or made to be in national service organizations because they had the power already to stop the president and didnt!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

As an Independent, you know- one of those pesky little voters who swing elections…..
If Hillary Clinton steal this nomination, you will have a wealth of other Independents along with myself thatmay just make life not so nice.
Remember, we’ve already tolerated 8 years of imbecile voter repucussions, another 4 based on the merit, and not lies and MSM media is why we ARE INDEPENDENT.
Independents will not vote for someone who makes their own rules based on entitlement. It just won’t happen.

Posted by: Bud | May 3, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

rizabove i understand what you are trying to say. but at the same time….being a christian, in fact, catholic, being a blue collar worker, being for equality, being for equal pay for equal work, being for women earning the same amount on the dollar as a man, seeing 9/11 over and over again, i truly believe that hillary is the person to accomplish all the needs, security, peace, hopes and dreams of the american people.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

PGHPAVOTER
yea this reminds me of the John Adams series they were as partisan back then but realized late in life that they shouldve been more accomodating to the other Adams and Jefferson that is if the radicals want to start another party let them

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

@PGHPAVOTER: I’ve always found it difficult to predict the future. I think it is difficult to predict who will win the general election. Ultimately, we only know our own vote and it is mere speculation what others will do.
@DCVoter: I do not consider myself on the ‘left’, but think it will be difficult for Senator Clinton to win without their support – ask Al Gore.
@so saddened: yeah – mcgrady needs a break… i think the reason it is difficult to call the general election if it came down to Obama v. McCain is that I think that, rather than voting for McCain, the Clinton supporters who can’t stand Obama would either not vote, vote a write-in (if allowed), or vote Nader. of course, i might be wrong, but Clinton and Obama don’t disagree on much so if you support one’s ideas you probably are pretty close to supporting the other’s. and odds are that they would probably fill the government with the same appointees, or at least those with the same mindset. McCain, on the other hand, I am not convinced would get rid of the Bush/Cheney yes-men.

Posted by: MIguy | May 3, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

And just for proof-
I publicly state-
WE NEED A THIRD PARTY IN ALL ELECTIONS-
this 2 party #### is about 100 years too old.
Worked great when the population was less then a million, but hardly accomodates the majority of opinions this day in age.

Posted by: Bud | May 3, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Bud – disenfranchised is not quite the word I think you meant to use. Obama supporters votes count and therefore they are not disenfranchised (except in FL and MI so far). Ironically, it is Obama who did not agree to solutions that would enfranchise those voters and override the disenfranchisement ordered by the DNC. Had he done better in FL and MI, I have no doubt he would not have blocked the solutions. In following Clinton’s career, I believe strongly she would have accepted the solution because she is a true democrat. I do not believe Obama is one because he seeks and holds the support of a base that is largely not core democrats. I am an Independent like you but I support who I think the best candidate is for our future. Succesful process improvements require measured steps that do not break the system (Smart Change is part of Clinton’s message). Her record of smart change in the Senate with bipartisan support has lead to process improvements for her constituents. Her platform is based on goals that benefit all demographics with a balanced approach. Obama has not convinced core democrats and many Independents that his brand of hope and change is the smart track for our country. In fact, the PA results show she lead Obama in votes from Independents. However, no matter who the nominee is, half the voters participating in the democratic nomination race will be unhappy at least for a time. As an Independent, I look forward to the possibility of becoming a democrat if I see smart change within the DNC. Their incompetence since WJC left office is the reason I have not joined. If Senator Clinton is the nominee and there are some major party leadership changes and process improvements, I will consider joining. If the liberal latte in currently in control of the party remains with the same old non-democratic processes in place, I will consider joining a national party of centrist Independents.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Bud
on the contrary entitlement is the foundation of Obamas campaign yes we can is what teenagers say when they dont get to do what they want!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

@ DcVoter,
The problem is everytime Obama loses, those Super D endorse him.
Just like yesterday and today.
Hillary needs to make an argument she won all the big states and only Primary states in the G.E.
This is frustating.
We know she can win but the Super D just don’t want to accept it.
Do you have any idea?
Thanks.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 3, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

DCVoter,
I caught an interesting article, I believe by Novak, don’t remember where, covering the poll distortion. It discounted the Bradley effect in this case. According to his theory the distortion has come from the inability of young pollsters to approach or connect with senior voters, in disproportionate numbers. If true, then the enthusiasm of youthful backers of Obama is causing the polls to skew in Obama’s favor, which explains the lopside win in Pennsylvania. This is all good news for Hillary. Even pollster.com, which has carried a sustained anti-Hillary bias for several months shows that Obama is starting to be crushed at warp speed. I’m starting to put a lot of credence in this theory, which leads me to believe that Hillary will capture the popular vote by June 3rd, not even counting Michigan and Florida. What do you think?
========================================
If we’re good Democrats, shouldn’t we find a way to include Michigan and Florida?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 3, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Miguy
Yes WE Will vote for Mccain if Obama is nominated its not our problem you cant see it as it really is now!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

@staniam:
I am not trying to reduce or dismiss your comment as your vote is as important as anyone’s. However, I think it is difficult to predict what those beyond us (or even in our sphere of influence) will do.

Posted by: MIguy | May 3, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

the obama campaign sounds like a bad episode of ths sopranos with grandmas, pastors, and friends, thrown under the bus and thugs manning the caucus sites and disrupting hillary events. this is organized intimidation-reminds me of florida and the republican machine. this is not the democrat party that i know, nor is it the party of my ancestors, family, and friends. if obama gets the nod i will absolutely not support him. and no i will not feel like i abandoned the party i will feel like the party abandoned me. imagine an obama ‘chicago style’ presidency. i am sorry this will never work for me, never.
somewhere in this equation ‘the left’ got the idea that to win they have to play dirty just like the opponent-right out of the rowe handbook-what a pity this was our election to lose.

Posted by: sonia trevino | May 3, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

I see Obama as the reason for the fracture of the democratic party. As long as Clinton is in the race, the democratic party has a chance of winning and remaining strong. If Obama gets the nomination, a lot of Clinton people will defect. McGovern had similar demographics, and he lost big time and 6 million democrats left the party for good.

Posted by: annonymous | May 3, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Westcoastmessenger
THere is some truth to the media made the mistake to folow the starry eyed followers of Obama and like Bush Obama is several weeks or months behind where polls are or where the real sentiment is

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Obama team twisting the truth or lying to voters?? Here is another one…
On it’s homepage, the Obama campaign is promoting a New Republic article from early February, claiming Obama outperforms Hillary against McCain in every poll.
This is not true and hasn’t been for some time. Currently, Hillary outperforms Sen. Obama in most polls. The AP reports on their poll, released today:
Hillary Rodham Clinton has a better chance than Barack Obama of beating Republican John McCain, according to a new Associated Press-Ipsos poll that bolsters her argument that she is more electable in the fall than her rival for the Democratic nomination.
The survey released Monday gives Clinton a fresh talking point as she works to convince pivotal undecided superdelegates to side with her in the drawn-out Democratic primary fight.
Clinton, who won the Pennsylvania primary last week, has gained ground this month in a hypothetical head-to-head match up with the GOP nominee-in-waiting; she now leads McCain, 50 percent to 41 percent, while Obama remains virtually tied with McCain, 46 percent to 44 percent.

Posted by: Eric | May 3, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

DCVoter-
as a voter living in Florida, I disagree with your post. Majority who showed up and voted in our state were those voting on their Homestead exemption. HRC is and was running on name recognition, certainly not her own merits. I would say that Obama has put quite a dent in the Clinton armor given he has only had 15 months, wouldn’t you?
I don’t want to disenfranchise anyone, but if the democratic party expects me to trust them to run this country- then they can certainly follow their own rules. If they can’t do that, if they let a woman make her own to win the nomination….. Well, that just reminds me of George Bush, and how he has altered the rules for 8 years. I say NO THANK YOU.

Posted by: Bud | May 3, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

In response to one poster’s observation that Obama hasn’t addressed a crowd of Clinton supporters and the implication that Obama’s supporters are just so gracious and wonderful, um, NO, Obama supporters are NOT so great and gracious. They were the ones booing NC’s governor at the dinner this evening – very tacky, I think, in this setting. I’m also disappointed that this article is so biased. Hillary was NOT rendered speechless at ANY point in the evening. Also, Obama couldn’t address the crowd of Clinton supporters because many of them departed after hearing the star of the show. His speech was, in all fairness, probably scheduled after hers because of a conflict with an appearance he had in Charlotte this evening that necessitated a later speaking time. Still, Clinton supporters had the benefit of hearing their candidate and exiting to attend her after-party rally. Had she been the final speaker, you can best believe we would have behaved much more graciously than did the crowd representing him this evening. I’m sure even he would have been ashamed of such divisive and disrespectful behavior.

Posted by: Joey | May 3, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

MIguy – the numbers already show that she can win more than 286 electors without Obama supporters. The polls show only 20% of Obama supporters would not vote for Clinton in Nov. Numerically, she can win without them.
With Obama only garnering 208 electoral votes so far, only 52 remaining possible, and 28% of Clinton supporters not voting for Obama in Nov., numerically, he cannot win without her supporters.
Bottom line – she doesnt need his supporters but he does need hers. If the party unifies there will be a landslide dem victory but that is a big if that the party is worried about.
Bud – I am all for a centrist party and one has been formed. Unfortunately, no Independent candidate has ever gotten more than 4% of the vote in a GE and it will take many years to become viable. The major parties control the Congress and the country prospers when the dems control Congress regardless of which party a President belongs to. The most prosperous years in our history were under a centrist President and a centrist Congress – that term was WJC’s second term. I believe we need to take the good things we learned in those years and capitalize on them. Meanhwile we can correct the errors of those years and that is Clinton’s plan.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Mondale,Dukakis,Gore,Kerry won the
nomination but ALL lost the general
elections.
I believe the next democratic candidate
will go down the same roard.
No ultra liberal ever won the white
house.
In general elections Americans looking
for a candidate with certain values.
Obama doesn’t hold those values,special
among the white america.
Obama’s electability is zero in
november.He may win the nomination,but
in november elections will join the team of losers.

Posted by: NIcholas | May 3, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

It seems that when it comes to ‘my’ candidate, many seem to put on blinders as to ‘my’ candidate’s flaws. Like moths to the flame…

Posted by: MIguy | May 3, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

miguy, i understand your point of view, but disagree. in many ways, obama’s stated positions are like hillary’s – and copied from hers – but there can be a huge difference in what a candidate says and what he does. i think this is particularly true for obama, who really hasn’t done anything (obamabots line up now to list the bills he allegedly passed – they were handed to him by one of his backers to help him build a resume. do the research). also, obama has shown himself highly susceptible to unpleasant influence as well as highly unsure of his own identity, which can be a recipe for disaster.
but even if one disagrees about all that, there is the other point – about the likely actions of hillary’s supporters if obama is nominated. i agree that many will stay home/vote nader/write in hillary. and that enough would probably cost him the general.
however, many will vote mccain, for two reasons: 1) because they feel so very strongly that obama simply must not be elected; and 2) because mccain is in fact more closely aligned to their views than obama. one can argue about the latter, but many hillary supporters are in fact moderates and obama is far from moderate. given the choice of a far left dem or a relatively centrist repub, many will choose the repub.
another point is the longterm effects of such a move. obamabots are fond of saying that the african-american and youth voters will defect from the party forever. however, this is based on their current emotions about one individual candidate. in the long run, people tend to calm down and return to form.
if, however, moderate voters switch parties, they are likely to stay gone. after all, they were closer to the line anyway. as you know, the reagan democrats stayed gone until bill clinton came along and they wouldn’t have returned then if obama, kerry, etc., had been the nominee.
and finally, all of this presupposes that even more highly damaging information doesn’t come out about obama. i strongly believe that it will. and if it does, all discussion based on historical patterns, etc., will be out the window. there is a threshold for this sort of thing (wright, ayers/dohrn, rezko, etc.) that, once passed, cannot be overcome. obama will be painted as socialist, radical, dishonest, weak, etc. and it will stick – i think it will appropriately stick, but respect your different opinion.
well, it’s late. jazz won big. off to bed. have a good one.

Posted by: so saddened | May 3, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

@staniam:
you are right – it is not a good ‘argument’. my guess is most Obama supporters would vote Clinton and the rest would either not vote or vote Nader if they can’t stand her.

Posted by: MIguy | May 3, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Bud,
In my book name recognition is probably a better gauge to make a decision, say when it comes to electing Presidents or buying beer than a toss of the dice for the unknown. By the way, I’d rather throw down a good pint of name brand beer anytime versus weak coolaid.
=======================================
Obama, bitter, bitter, Obama
=======================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 3, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

ruth – there are many demographics who have been wronged by our government and our people… much of it continues today with Native Americans and women as an example. The role of government on those issues is to write laws, enforce laws, and administer consequences for breaking those laws. Government cannot control culture but they can mandate and enforce equality. Unfortunately, black men are the only ones who have achieved their goals of equal pay for equal work. We have come far but we have a long way to go for all Americans. A class action suit would not solve the issues of equality – the only candidate who plans that benefit all Americans based on common goals is Clinton. We must be realistic in understanding that the role of the President has nothing to do with making or enforcing laws. Some Obama supporters hope that electing an interracial candidate would negate the impact of cultural differences and the influence of big business in Washington – but that is not realistic. Smart change is incremental – Clinton knows how to bring about smart change – she can deliver the changes America needs and turn our hopes into reality not just dreams.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

@DCVoter: As you noted (I think it was you some time ago at least), if polls were accurate predictors at this stage then John Kerry would be president. It is just not feasible to extrapolate current polls/statistics to the general election at this point.
@so saddened: respect your opinion, but i’m not sure that Senator Clinton is as moderate as you suggest. she does seem to take the majority opinion generally, so that may balance her from swinging too far in either direction. but i’m not sure this is an asset.
anyway, you’re right, it’s late and i think we all are interested in what happens on tuesday. thanks for the diversion from work tonight – goodnite all.

Posted by: MIguy | May 3, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

MiGuy,
I’m glad that you came to your senses and realized that your candidate has plenty of flaws. Those that see that you’ve been blinded by emotions and have disregarded all sense of facts and reality are not surprised by this result. Others that you thought were hooked into the false sense of non-Democratic reality offered by Obama are also experiencing a similar dawning. Welcome to American Democracy. Aren’t you glad that Hillary didn’t quit, or we’d just be left with McCain instead.
=======================================Obama says gas tax is a shell game. Maybe he has plenty of shells and doesn’t care. Hillary is rich too but I know she has not forgotten the working class. She is the hero of the working class!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 3, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Bud – the FL state democratic party did not violate the DNC rules. They asked for a date that was within the rules and the FL legislature (rep controlled currently) moved the date up causing the problem with FL. On top of that, the DNC did not treat all states equally which violated their own rules and the constitutional right of FL voters guaranteed by the constitution under the equal protection clause. This was affirmed as a substantive argument in the case heard by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. They ordered the district court to vacate its ruling against a FL voter and instructed him how to refile his case. As a FL voter you might want to follow that case closely. I disagree with the contention that FL voters did not know who Obama is – do you not have newspapers, Internet, television, cable, and satellite services? Of course you do! The FL primary turnout was twice the 2004 turnout which validated the will of the voters. The FL SOS certified the election results and noted there were almost no voting irregularities. Did Obama make a dent? Sure but that happened because of the MSM coverage which FL voters had access to.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

wcm, i agree…i think obama is playing a ‘shell’ game. shall we say shell oil. how many billions did they make on the bottom line this year….or last????? whatever it is, it is a hell of a lot than any of us will ever see.
i believe every break we get is a break we need.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

MIguy – perhaps you should watch the documentary about the 2004 election noting the reason Kerry lost was caused by election fraud he chose not to investigate and conceded too early (against his own campaign promises). The Ohio SOS has confirmed the fraud and the Office of Homeland Security is being sued by Ohio for destroying federal election results. In the documentary, officials testified that Kerry confirmed he knew that NM had fraudulent election results and chose not to fight them because he believed he would win anyway. Then he conceded without waiting until all the votes were verified in Ohio. He lost the election by his own choice and the DNC was complicit. They are all incompetent.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

WCM – let’s not forget that as Obama criticizes Clinton for pushing a vote on the gas tax holiday that Obama’s buddy Durbin proposes to increase the gas tax (which would be passed on to consumers) and that Obama voted for a gas tax holiday as state senator… hypocritical politician he is apparently.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

The old powerbase of the world is shifting and people are a scared of what tomorrow brings. It will be a better world if Obama is elected. So let go of your hate for those who do no resemble you. You are going into a era of cooperation. The entire globe is under distress, you see it and feel it but you are so steeped in hate and fear. You might as well put down your daggers and sword and march on peacefully. A change is coming!

Posted by: truth | May 3, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Okay chill out Obama supporters. What is going to happen in North Carolina is not what happened in South Carolina. Hillary Clinton is going to score an upset in North Carolina and just watch- Obama is fishy and there’s something not right about him. Hillary KNOWS what she’s doing and she’s worked hard all her life for this moment and she wants it really bad, Obama does not- I mean he takes days off campaigning while Hillary is out there working hard for votes and showing how much she wants it. Obama doesn’t even know what to do with our high prices of gas- At least Hillary and John McCain have a solution what does he have?? (cricket) My point exactly.

Posted by: Julio Alanis | May 3, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

Cristyn – that townhall is being held because Obama refused to debate Clinton – he was invited to debate and he declined. George may have worked for WJC but he is anti-Hillary as shown on his shows and his stupid questions to her about irrelevant topics. She holds her own with him the same as she does with any MSM host or pundit. His job is to increase viewership and ratings for his employer. Please dont confuse loyalties with advertising dollars.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

This is not good for the DNC anymore. It is just spewing hate. It is set up to divide, doubt, and destroy this party. People get it together. If you don’t vote democratic in Nov. you have no one to blame but yourselves for McCan’t in office. So get a grip and realize that Obama will be the nominee in June and either vote for him or let the country go to the dogs.

Posted by: lemonlime | May 3, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

I will vote Democrat in the fall. If it happens to be Hillary, I will cast my vote with vomit in my throat. But I’m not stupid enough to let this country suffer Bush’s 3rd term. Only idiots threaten that kind of stuff.

Posted by: Cristyn | May 3, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

cristyn, i appreciate and respect your honesty. i don’t want a damn republican in office. i have had enough. my job is borderline going to mexico next year…..believe me, i am going to fight to the end, or to the ‘whatever’ to keep it here in the USA!!!!

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

carlasue – I think it is a given that a Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket would result in a landslide win for the dems in Nov. Only the anti-Clinton folks in the DNC like Pelosi, Reid, Leahy, and Dean are against that ticket. Kennedy and Kerry want Obama but at least they are not stupid enough to voice opposition. I will support a Clinton/Obama ticket without question. I would likely support an Obama/Clinton ticket only because I know she is strong enough to control Obama and prevent Kennedy and Kerry from controlling him. I will not vote for Obama without Clinton in the mix… period. I am an American first, an Independent second, and a democratic supporter third. As for the good of the country, my perspective has not changed. No matter who is POTUS, it will be Congress who effects change and I will vote for democrats for Congress no matter who I need to vote for because we will never get change without a filibuster proof democratic majority. With McCain, he has enough respect in Congress as a maverick, centrist, and bipartisan player that Congress will keep him in check – and he will only get through 1 term at most. With Obama, he will be another Carter that cannot get anything done that he proposes because Congress will not bankrupt the country with an increase in personal income, payroll tax, and capital gains taxes. With Clinton, she already has bipartisan support in Congress and has both a great command of the issues, a proven record of smart change, and the strength and respect to be CIC. So as an Independent, in my view, the choices are Clinton, McCain, and then Obama. Luckily, I only have to choose between Clinton and McCain. With 44% of the country identifying as Independents, there is no doubt the DNC is worried they will lose by their own devices. I hope and believe the voters and the SDs will select Clinton as the nominee so that I do not have a tough choice to make.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

NOBODY ASKS THE MOST IMPORTANT
QUESTION.
“WHO IS ELECTABLE IN NOVEMBER”
OBAMA OR HILLARY????
HILLARY HAS BETTER CHANGE IN
NOVEMBER BECAUSE SHE WON ALL THE BIG
STATES WITH THE MAJORITY OF THE ELECTORAL VOTES.
IT TAKES 270 ELECTORAL VOTES TO WIN
THE WHITE HOUSE.
OBAMA LOST ALL THOSE BIG STATES.
HIS ELECTABILITY IS ALMOST ZERO.
HE CANNOT GET THOSE 270 ELECTORAL
VOTES.CHECK STATE BY STATE.
DEMOCRATS ARE STUPID AGAIN.
ALWAYS NOMINATE A LOSER.

Posted by: NIcholas | May 3, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

Rosie,
I think as Democrats, we need to be careful of bringing issues up that have nothing to do with a person’s ability to be President. Bill’s infidelities are in no way an indication of what kind of leader Hillary would make. Once we start playing that game, we open the floodgates for Republicans to criticize Obama (and any other Democrat) for all the non-issues that have come out lately (by the way, they’re deviding us Democrats on silly issues on purpose!)
However, you do bring up an interesting point. I for one don’t want to be around all the scandal that will be in the tabloids IF the Clintons are in the White House again (which I think I can safely say, they won’t be). I have definitely taken that into consideration in deciding who to support (along with the fact that Obama is the only inspiring politician I’ve seen in my lifetime).

Posted by: Cristyn | May 3, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

dc, how right you are….i would do the same…i think hillary would be the pillar of strength of the two.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Indiana and North Carolina please end this run for Obama, he’s a divider not a uniter like he claims. He’s dividing the democratic party and the country too. Obama and his supporters are arrogant, immature people that hate anyone that doesn’t agree with them.

Posted by: Persio | May 3, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

I just hope everyone vote Dem. in November. I’m getting worried. The Democrats have really screwed up this time (no matter who you blame), considering this election should really be a freebie. VOTE DEM!!!

Posted by: Cristyn | May 3, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Persio,
I think maybe you just feel that way because your candidate doesn’t really have a chance. Hillary people can be plenty mean an immature, too. I’m fairly certain that those traits aren’t specific to any one candidate or group of people.

Posted by: Cristyn | May 3, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

I am young. But my mother isn’t. She’s a middle-aged white woman who is currently more inspired than I am.
All we see is a chance for things in the political system to really change. Not just policies, but the way policies are made and who gets to pay who to make them. Without (sorry to use the word) HOPE, nothing ever gets better. I think for a lot of people who DID witness JFK and RFK, Obama is a nostalgic reminder of a time when people really felt like their voices counted and that things in this country were moving forward. I have always voted for the lesser of two evils. Not this time.

Posted by: Cristyn | May 3, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

Cristyn – had Obama had the integrity to stand true to his commitment in 2004 to not make a run in 2008 because he did not consider himself qualified, we would already have Clinton as a nominee and possibly him as a running mate. Instead he chose to be manipulated by Kennedy, Kerry, Leahy, Pelosi, Reid, and Dean into running against his mentor in the Senate whom they abhor and blame for losing control of the party to WJC for 8 years. There is so much more to politics than the voters realize. But there are more centrists in the party than there are liberals and this year they are faced with losing control again if Clinton gets the nomination.
“Centrism is not defined by compromise or moderation, it is considerate of them. It’s about achieving common sense solutions that fit the current needs; support the public trust; serve the common good; and are considerate of short and long term needs.”
70% of our country are centrists. The majority of core democrats are centrists. The DNC has failed to win more than one GE with a liberal candidate and that was Carter who accomplished zero and was defeated in a landslide election as the incumbent. That loss is the reason superdelegates were created to prevent that from happening again.
Gore was a centrist and fiscal conservative that won an election but lost because the DNC was too incompetent to win in court and too weak to get at least one democratic senator to join with 1 of 13 representatives in overriding the Supreme Court decision to block the vote recount. In 2004, they tried to push a liberal who could not garner enough support to override election fraud and were complicit in his concession without verifying the votes with a recount in Ohio. In 2006, they failed to win enough seats to achieve a filibuster proof Senate and will fail to do so again if they lose the GE in Nov.
Hopefully, the centrists in the DNC will do the right thing and take control again. The eagle cannot fly on one wing alone. In our diverse nation, we need a centrist who can unite the right and left wings with the centrist body – a liberal candidate like Obama would never accomplish that – a centrist like Clinton will. If you want your hopes to become reality, Clinton must be on the ticket.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

rosie not to justify b clinton’s behavior-however please keep in mind that john kennedy was a womanizer as well, big times. and i often hear obama supporters comparing obama to jfk be careful when casting stones in the air they often land on your own house.

Posted by: sonia trevino | May 3, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

cristyn…good for you!!! i love to hear the young people on this blog express their opinion. not that i am old for heaven sakes. but anyway….i think obama is trying to ‘imitate’ the best politicians in history….JFK etc…there will never be another one of those. and BTW i guess, by the facts, or so they say, he had affair after affair, but he was one of the most beloved presidents of our time.
I think obama’s time is not now. he is up and coming and should represent more than the ‘now’. we have to represent ‘all.’ with the majority of voters being in the baby boomer era, obama must reach out to them, and prove that he is for real. i am afraid he just doesn’t know how. hillary does. did you see the o’rielly factor on fox news. she blew him away. go hillary.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

I am tough I am a fighter. we did not see anyhting of this against Monica

Posted by: leche | May 3, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

good posts and facts dc.

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

Hillary Clinton, her husband, and her entire campaign have stooped to any level, gotten into any gutter, and thrown any mud they have felt was necessary to try and win this primary. You could see more class and dignity on an episode of “The Jerry Springer Show” than you see from these people. It seems to be the general consensus in most of the posts I read that her staying in this race and using the kind of dishonest, deceitful, and self-serving tactics she uses to achieve what is best for her, not this country, not you and me, not her political party, but HER, is only divisive and tearing apart the Democratic party. Senator Obama has tried to stay on the high road since the beginning of the race. I truly doubt that Hillary Clinton even knows the high road exists, more or less how to navigate it. You people who support her can’t seem to see this and accept how morally bankrupt and repugnant she is, and yet you have the nerve and the audacity to criticize a few of Senator Obama’s supporters for showing what amounts to poor manners? It’s unbelievable, it truly is. I don’t see how anyone could support her under any circumstances.

Posted by: Geezer52 | May 3, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Geezer52 sorry to say but half of the democratic party wants Hillary to win. So what you’re saying that half of the democratic party is so blind and stupid not to see her ways? Or maybe THAT half prefers and trust her more than Obama with all his negatives!

Posted by: Persio | May 3, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

morals schmorals… blah blah blah… i suspect there are a lot of pots calling the kettle black on these blogs… WJC was a man who got caught cheating, lied when he got caught, tried to justify it as not having sex… like 80% of the men in this country believe according to multiple studies conducted by legitimate experts… i have news for you!… WJC is not running for POTUS… and when he was POTUS, he left office with a surplus, prosperous economy, a nation at peace, and a 60% approval rating even after all that mess… let’s talk about who is running for POTUS… lets talk about how she stood up and supported him and believed him as any good spouse should… about how she fought hard against the RNC machine for 29 years prior and all the years since… about how she remained strong in the face of adversity that was and still is unrelenting… lets talk about how 40+ million of our tax dollars were wasted trying to take her down and ZERO wrongdoings on her part were ever proven… we have never had a more vetted candidate than Senator Clinton in the history of our nation… no one is perfect, we are all human… the things she misremembers or embellishes on are inconsequential as it relates to this race for the nomination and the Presidency… we have only two choices in for the nomination… WJC is not one of them… if you believe BO is your guy, go for it… why not try telling us why you support him and stop blaming her for the indiscretions of WJC and start acknowledging that most Americans approve of him as President even after the scandal… bottom line is she has accomplished all that she has in spite of WJC not because of him… what has Obama done that compares to her accomplishments? Contrast his resume with hers and show us why you think he is better!

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am

Hillary doesnt just have a chance she has a big one and when she beats Obama you will turn on the media with your hateful rehtoric they dont want you to get mad at them but the race is over for Obama he will not win!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

NO WAY!!!!!
I WILL NOT VOTE DEMOCRAT IF OBAMA GETS THE NOMINATION.
OBAMA DIVIDED THE DEMOCRATS THIS TIME.
IT WAS VERY EASY FOR DEMOCRATS TO WIN
THIS YEAR BUT WITH OBAMA,WHITES WILL GO REPUBLICAN AGAIN.
OBAMA IS THE BIGGEST JOKE.
OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE.

Posted by: NIcholas | May 3, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

Hillary and those who support her
are making very bad decisionS who will hurt the party. vote for Obama
WAY TO GO OBAMA 2008

Posted by: lee | May 3, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

What is with the Obama supporters? The one’s who cry unity and complain about divisiveness. Were Clinton supporters booing Obama? If so, I didn’t read it in this article. Booing Clinton and chanting Obama while Clinton was speaking or the North Carolina Governor started to speak I guess separates the adults from the kids. It’s this kind of stuff that is just turning people off.
There is absolutely no reason either candidate should be booed just because you like the other candidate better.
These knuckleheads need to come back and vote when they grow up, and that includes the middle-aged knuckleheads who should no better.

Posted by: alpaig | May 3, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

I guess we got the bad commercials for Obama crowd on tonight if you dont have anything to say that is constructive just go away because you wont influence us Clinton folks

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

Personally, I think the legal adult age should be 25 for serving in the military, drinking alcohol, and voting. We would be more likely to have an mature electorate, a more competent military, and less lives lost to drunk drivers.

Posted by: DCVoter | May 3, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

It was only affirmative action that got Obama to the place he is today and thats not racist!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

thank you dc voter. you know the only thing some of these anti clinton posts do for me is re-affirm my commitment not to vote for obama if he gets the nod from the ‘paid off super delegates’. obama has donated so much to super delegate campaigns that it is no wonder these self serving dogs endorse him. but their election day is dawning also and we must never forget who they are.

Posted by: sonia trevino | May 3, 2008, 3:33 am 3:33 am

Sonia
yea that one superdelegate that was a former DNC chairman(DNC is irrelevant now)anyway Joe Andrew was supposedly going to bring a lot of cash in to the campaign that you dont have to count:) Hillary has money but guts too!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Yea I just read an article about how more money from wall st and defense contractors etc is going to Obama that proves hes just more of the same… Yes we will elecct a Populist President which is not Obama!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

Carlasue
Yea well who do you think is a better representitive of Indiana Andrew or Evan Baye:) they might as well have gotten Dan Quayle their trying to be the spoiler candidate for the republicans!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 3:45 am 3:45 am

miller1, no one wants the same politics as we have had over the last 7 years. good god, get hillary in the white house. she handled bill o’reilly like the tooth fairy…..she can take on the big challenges that our country faces from day one. we need experience in the white house, not a bunch of talk, talk, talk, oh wait a minute, i denounce that…..talk talk talk…..

Posted by: carlasue | May 3, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am

Up until this election cycle, I had no idea how RADICAL the left of the democratic party is. The far left liberals are just as nuts as the far right ultra conservatives.
I dont know if I will even stay in the democratic party if the far left takes it over. Last time that happened was the Carter years and we all know how that turned out.
We really should start a third party.
The centerist party. The party that takes the best of the republican ideals and the democratic ideals, and throws the rest into the waste bin.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 3, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am

miller that is part of the problem some of you equate this election to a sporting event or american idol. wow! thanks for the analogy. we really must raise the voting age.

Posted by: sonia trevino | May 3, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Hillary complains about Obama whinning when it was she who whine about why am I always asked the question first and even cried because she thought she was about to lose because she just wanted to stay in the race, lied about being shot at among other things, Bill claims he gets upset when someone talks about his love one, He who humiliated her more than anyone ever could in front of the whole world, and seems to be getting senile lied about her being the lst lady and her being the first to visit other countries, and sold out American jobs to other countries. She talks about all that she’s done which hasn’t amounted to much. Women are no better off by her having been in gov’t thus far. Playing her campaign off Wright, who by the way, has freedom of speech which is an american right. She should be trying to condemn Bush who has this country in the worst shape in history. Speak on the issues and stop trying to bring your opponent down, we are tried of hearing this mess. What are you going to do?

Posted by: koni | May 3, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am

All these ‘Clintonians’ still relentlessly trying to weave their ‘Republican propaganda’, and deviously disgusting slander, to try and sabotage the higher aspirations of the positive-minded American public.

Posted by: Bravo Encore | May 3, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am

Actually I was just trying to figure out how many more supporters JM was going to receive…. Either way I think he wins because there is such division amongst the Dems. And if you stay home and don’t vote, you cast your vote as if you voted for him, anyway. I’m just trying to find out what the lessor of two evils is. Because I believe when it is all said and done… It will be Bo vs JM……Just another thought………

Posted by: miller1 | May 3, 2008, 4:17 am 4:17 am

Crystal, yes, all Senator Obama has to say to these sophisticated voters is …
“Air We Can Breathe In …. ”
and they will get all inspired and charged up, and will start shouting “Yes WE Can.”
The only problem is that they don’t know what they are claiming they can do. Nor do they know what they are inspired to do.
Probably because of many years of education and leading a very sophisticated lifestyle ….. that’s my guess.
Happy Voting, NC and IN!!!!
You guys will make history on May 6, 2008!

Posted by: Thom Knight | May 3, 2008, 4:23 am 4:23 am

I am over 50, white, catholic and lost my job to NAFTA =went to Mexico-Hillary complained a few months ago about all the media picking on her-and now they have turned on Obama-Chris Mathews thinks Hillary is going to win the nomination and LOVES her=even though he said she is embellishing the truth about NAFTA and even though she said she would obliterate Iran-which he said was only said in a campaign moment that that didn’t count and even Bill O’Reilly said that He interviews a woman candidate different than he does men so her spin zone wasn’t like the men candidates are going to get-and then on MSNBC Birch Bayh said that Hillary is leading among REAL voters=Caucus states do not vote so their view should not be counted\talk about an elitest group=hey all you states that had caucuses=your voice should not be counted in determining delegates=Bill and Hillary have short term memory about NAFTA=they got it passed and even Chris Mathews said it’s rather funny how she has selective memory but thinks it’s great she’s getting away with it=so don’t tell me all news media is against Hillary\It seems when Hillary cries foul about negative remarks she can whine=when Obama supporters cry foul we are whiners=she is saying anything to win and oh by the way-I am BITTER-she and Bill lost my job for me 5 years ago=people wake up and you know we are going to hear all about Whitewater, Monica, sniper fire, bill’s pardons=gee two of them were friends of Ayers=how soon we forget=this needs to be over and we need someone new-who was against the war and just because he isn’t going for the jugular doesn’t mean someone will not be a good president. Go Obama and blue coller workers=I used to be one-Remember who got NAFTA voted into law=the Clintons-It’s laughable that she’s saying she was against it=

Posted by: marge | May 3, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am

Hi Eric100. What is it with the History Lesson. This is a comment forum not an article page.
Short, to the point comments not very long articles with no substance like Hillary’s speeches

Posted by: Bjon | May 3, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am

If they would have escoreted the Obama supporters out of the hall the place would have been empty. They were very few people who supported Clinton. This is likely to be indicative of the results on Tuesday.

Posted by: Jim B | May 3, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

The Clinton and McCain campaign strategy is apparent. This is all you have?

Posted by: Jim B | May 3, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am

The reasons why Obama won’t debate Clinton yet again:
1. He refuses to get into a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
2. He prefers to stay far away from her foul mouth lest some of the filth contaminate him.
3. He has already debated her 21 times. He didn’t set the format for those debates; he didn’t approve the questions for those debates, so Clinton should by now have some idea what he might say in such a debate. Repetition is redundant.
4. It’s hard for a gentleman of his sensibilities to spend an hour or two putting down, contradicting, and rebutting every thing said to him by such a lovely lady as Clinton is.

Posted by: Kaelinda | May 3, 2008, 5:04 am 5:04 am

Wrong you are Jim Hillary will win NC

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 5:11 am 5:11 am

Bjon
you have Hilary confused with Obama he has no substance

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am

Josh
THe artocle says that it was the NC governor that was booed

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am

Mariann
I agree there is no substance at Obama rallys and they are rude and I worked for a rally in asheville NC for Hillary and peopl were respectful and Hillary was the best Id ever seen her the rally in another town in western NC yesterday was in republican territoery and got 2500 people this end of the state will give her a 1 pt victory statewide

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 5:19 am 5:19 am

Buying votes, putting plants in the audience. First of of ALL HILLARY IS NOT GOING TO WIN INDIANA, I will guarantee that. Plus the poll of polls is that fact she is tied with him. Plus polls dont mean crap, I wasnt even asked about who I was supporting, so I think they are just a big guess. Get a grasp. And finally, on the Wright thing, get over it, if Obama wanted, he could bring up people that the clintons had been assoisated with. Oh by the way, if Pastor Wright was so bad, why was he at the White House with the goofy clintons.

Posted by: Josh from Indiana | May 3, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

Um Dora
Obama is part of that 1 percent and thats what hes doing but when Hillaruy is elected we will make him pay litterally! out of touch elitist ultra liberals do not own this party

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

Di
one big rule is to not tell all you know and Obama broke that and hes goign to pay for it… imagine saying that Wright was not the person he knew 20 years ago … they both have been planning this for 20 years!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 5:28 am 5:28 am

Mariann
Well said it has always been speeches versus action and results and Hillary actually has nice non thugs working for her!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am

Notice, no one booed Hillary.
Her campaign touts the endorsement of a very unpopular governor. Not many North Carolina democrats or republicans have much good to say about Mike Easley these days. If you do your homework before coming to a state you would know this.

Posted by: ncvoter | May 3, 2008, 5:49 am 5:49 am

WOW! There are other things much more important than this article. I am not sure exactly how a ‘BOO’ for a NC governor became the subject of substance of thee hour. As I read through these comments, as an Independent, it makes me wonder why such paucities overshadow real issues in America (e.g. Gas prices, universal health care, economy). I would love to actually once see some commentary from the spilt Democratic party on these subjects: Democrats are ensnared continually over defending none issue articles; this is a daunting assertion. “How does this win me over as an Independent? It is already true that Democrats know their respective corners, this is painfully obvious and I seriously doubt that Democrats will rally together like Republicans do so much eloquently come Nov. Aren’t you all tired of this (in) fighting DEM’S?
I encourage you all to get beyond this ‘high school mentality’ get out there and help people learn about the good things your candidate will bring to the table instead of but slogans. Give me a reason to vote for your candidate this November. I don’t want to hear about ‘Experience & Toughness’; many of the most prominent presidents in our history had little experience in big government and yet had to be tough against conventional wisdom to do great things for the American people (do your research). I don’t want to hear about ‘Change’ unless someone can tell me what’s going to change (direct me to some facts about some of these changes that will take place).
Good luck to us all Nov 08.

Posted by: Ms. V | May 3, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am

Those in your USA that support BO should take a close look at the African continent & what happens when an inexperienced president is elected to office, look at us with the resources that Africa posesses we should be the main players on the world stage, yet because of the inexperience we are left in the dust with our hands open for handouts. I agree with him in how great it would be for change in the political machine, but if he thinks (& the American public thinks)that he can change things up on the hill just because he has an office on Pensilvania Ave. and the ability to talk a good game, he & the American people will be sorely dissapointed! unfortunatly it will be too late for the country.
THINK BEFORE YOU VOTE, HE IS AFTER ALL JUST A POLITICIAN!

Posted by: Sasha (Soth Africa) | May 3, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am

NCvoter
Good point I said about the same thing earlier tonight the poltical hacks and pundits have no idea what they are talking about NC doesnt want Obama!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am

the wave of change is here and some people
are afraid of change, they have become old bottles and old bottles can not hold new wine .new wine is put on new bottles , which are you? old or new? hillary or obama? obama 08 4 better america

Posted by: eman | May 3, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

I can’t understand why some people bring the race issue into this campaign. It means, after all, America is not what she is, the so called Liberator and the champion of the oppressed. The fact is America is too quick to judge what is right for other and too slow to judge the ideology that remains deep within, like painting Obama with Black Liberation Theology. This does not make sense at all. If we can look beyond the past ideologies of race and color, then Obama’s candidacy portrays the image of what America stands for, LIBERATION. Let this be in Obama.

Posted by: Bobby | May 3, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

You would think that Obama would reign in that kind of behaviour from his supporters. Isn’t that what his new kind of politics is all about?
I can’t believe he’s going to be the nominee. You guys are going to regret it…

Posted by: Mark | May 3, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

The main problem that I have with Obama is that this guy is so arrogant he has not done anything to earn that hardest job in that world. Our country could easily slip into becoming a weak nation after what we have been through the last 7 years. We need someone who we know can handle this job. In 2004 Obama admitted he was not qualified to run for office this time around and now he is running. He is so arrogant to think he can solve the country’s problems even though he has only been in the senate for 2 years.

Posted by: Samantha | May 3, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

So this is the agent of change, so much for bringing people together, no thanks. He supporters are a vile rude bunch that I want no part of. Democrat for McCain.

Posted by: kittyCat | May 3, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

If Obama and his campaign are the ‘new’ politics, I will take the old politics instead thanks.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 3, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Is it really surprising that Obama supporters make a scene? Look at the kind of people who are willing to support this guy.
I don’t know how they are not offended that he speaks down to them. He says he is telling them the truth like they can’t understand what is happing in the world unless he explains it to them.

Posted by: Joej | May 3, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

“If you want a true role model and one that you want your children and grand children to follow he is the man.”
Warren, I don’t want a role model for my kids who voted against a bill in the Illinois State Senate that would have required school boards to install software on public computers accessible to minors to block sexually explicit material. That was HB 1812 (in 1999).
Nor do I want as a role model for my children a man who voted against a crime bill in the Illinois State Senate to give no offer of “good time” for sex offenders sentenced to the County Jail.
*Obama was the only vote against this measure. That was SB 485 (also in 1999).
Do some research, folks. What kind of man votes like this? We know all about your candidate.

Posted by: Sandy in PA | May 3, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Shameful! Senator Obama’s supporters at this dinner and Senator Obama himself will resort to any abusive tactic against Senator Clinton and her supporters. I guess they never heard of “southern hospitality”. Senator Hillary Clinton has proven, over and over, that she is a fighter. Whenever she is beaten down she emerges stronger than ever. She is a fighter and has demonstrated that she is ready to face any challenge. A vote for Hillary is a vote for peace and prosperity. The people of North Carolina and Indiana will not be fooled by Senator Obama’s empty promises. Hillary will deliver! Hillary Clinton speaks for us!!! Hillary supporters are proud of her for standing up for what she believes is right and just.

Posted by: activist44 | May 3, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Joe J is right!
Obama keeps talking about how he is the only one telling the public the truth. To me this is very condescending. He makes it sound like the American people could not understand what is happening in the world if he did not explain it. Oh thanks for doing the hard math on how much the gas tax would save us, Obama. He is an elitist.

Posted by: AaronGros | May 3, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

You Hillary supporters are so over the line that it is hard to remember where the line ever was.
Obama didn’t ‘plant’ anyone.
Hillary has the highest unfavorable rating numbers of anyone.
She panders unmercifully.
She lies continually.
She hides her shady past by squealing whenever anyone brings it up (but I’ve been vetted!)
She simply refused to answer questions that she deems inappropriate, then rails against Obama if he does the same thing (which he doesn’t!).
She’s defected to the Republicans in her kiss-up with the conservative nation.
The list goes on and on and on…and you try to stick the fact that the audience voiced its displeasure over Hillary’s nature and campaign on Obama?
In the words of a Supreme Court Justice that I suspect Hillary supports: Get over it.

Posted by: Tika | May 3, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

“She simply refused to answer questions that she deems inappropriate, then rails against Obama if he does the same thing (which he doesn’t!).”
TIKA–I believe your buddy Obama has been challenged to multiple debates with Hillary in the past week or so, but he has declined. If you’re wondering who won’t answer questions they think are inappropriate, you ahve only to look at your joke of a candidate. He’s afraid to debate her again because he got trounced in the Philly debate.
I think you need to get over it, and open your eyes.

Posted by: Sandy in PA | May 3, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Geraldine Ferraro said it best, Americans are caught up in the idea of having something different as their president. That is really all that Obama is about. He gives the appearance of something different, but he is much the same. I would prefer someone who has been around the block a few times to lead America in the aftermess of Bush. If Hillary is not nominated, McCain gets my vote, he is probably the only Republican I would eve vote for.

Posted by: JRS | May 3, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Take it to the floor, Hillary. Show them what you are made of. If the DNC betray you, the good old boy can use some help from you to save this country from a 4 years of sleeping with the enemy.

Posted by: mtr2311 | May 3, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

that’s obama style class- booing!
I hope Clinton Does NOT work for the evil Obama if he gets the nomination.

Posted by: trettin | May 3, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Debate? Do you really call that Clinton-inspired ABC attack against Obama a debate? I would NEVER agree to any debate with Clinton after witnessing that smirking George ripping into Obama and then defending himself by saying it was fair.
BS.
The ONLY way that would have even approached the fairness quota would have been if for EVERY SINGLE gotcha question they threw at Obama, they threw a similar one at Hillary.
Oh, I forgot! Hillary doesn’t EVER have to answer for her actions because she has been vetted.
BS.
That was the hatchet job of the century,
and if you think in any way shape or form that the fact Obama doesn’t want to go through another Hillary love fest portrayed as a debate, then you have truly gone over to the dark side and there is no hope for you.

Posted by: Tika | May 3, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

Take it to the floor Hillary. The DNC needs to let Florida and Michigan speak or this election is a farce, in fact the DNC is a farce. Don’t back Obama, he doesn’t deserve it.

Posted by: kittyCat | May 3, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

“That was the hatchet job of the century”
TIKA–if it makes you feel better to believe that it was a “hatchet job” when your candidate stumbled, ummed, ahhed, got cranky when finally asked real questions, and, oh yeah – LOST THE DEBATE, go right ahead and believe it.
We’re used to the delusions of the Obama fans. Its ok. Its actually been given a name – ODS or Obama Derangement Syndrome. It causes irrational adoration.

Posted by: Sandy in PA | May 3, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Republicrat
keep on being baffled because Clinton will carry both states then Obama will be gone!

Posted by: staniam | May 3, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

I am still waiting fr a report from one of the major networks about the shenanigans of the Obama teams during the Texas Caucus’. It thoroughly explains the reason we’ve not yet received the results of those caucus and how the results we have gotten don’t match the actual primary voting in the state. This has occured all over the country in states that have held caucus’. What does the Obama campaign teach in their organizing sessions and exactly what did Sen. Obama organize in Chicago when he claims that he was a community organizer? When is Obama and Wright going to be asked about the violence that is rocking the inner city of Chicago where children are being killed by gunfire going to school. Just exactly what have they done for these people? Rezko anyone?

Posted by: glennmcgahee | May 3, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

I see- it’s OK for Clinton and her supporters to “throw the kitchen sink” (theri actual quote) at Obama, but not OK for Obama supporters to display how they feel about such tactics? May I remind you that the “kitchen sink” has consisted primarily of guilt by a ssociation? No wonder they booed- it is that history of gutter politics that keeps me from supporting her.
If any of you find anything in Obama’s record that indicates he shares the extremist feelings of Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, or any other idiot, please post. But please be certain you verify your info as fact and not just a blog post of someone who hasn’t…

Posted by: TJ | May 3, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Talk about toughness:
Hillary is the one, no matter how much we all pretend and deny it.
“Again. Obama would never give a speech in front of a bunch of Clinton supporters. This is the third speech she has given in front of Obama supporters.”
Obama = Coward + Fraud

Posted by: Jkan | May 3, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

I keep hearing this experience argument for Hillary. Obama has spent more time in elected office than she. She voted for the war. Voted for a bankruptcy bill that says you can only refinance your SECOND home to help you get out of debt. I believe that is the same bill she said she hoped it did not pass. You don’t vote FOR a bill you did NOT want to pass!?!? She promised her constituents in NY 200k more jobs. She based that on Gore winning the Presidency!?!?!? They LOST 30k!!! Everyone’s beating up on Obama for his lack of judgement on his pastor. How ’bout Hillary’s lack of judgement when she flat out lied to the American people with the Bosnia story??? Now she’s pandering on the gas tax – knowing it would raise prices even higher when the “holiday” is over. Consumers would not get the $.184 as savings – even in the short run!
She’s a joke and a fraud. You all know it. That said…I still have to vote for her if she’s the nominee. God help us.

Posted by: Craig | May 3, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Moderator: Do you believe that life begins at inception? and Senator Clinton? . Hillary: ” I believe life has potential at inception”. Moderator:” and you, Senator Obama?”. Obama :” uhm…uhm…uhm…I haven’t really given it much thought…uhm…” . People, make your own judgement. This is what happens at the abortion issue debate, as a leader of the nation that leader needs to take a stand of his or her own and stick with it no matter what. Playing it safe is not a character of a leader. There are two good people who run for the White House, let’s support either one for the sake of our nation.

Posted by: mtr2311 | May 3, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

I am curious what Obama will do after November…when he wins the election and is sworn in office….and Hillary is still campaigning in Michigan and Florida….

Posted by: Kumbaya | May 3, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Obama land is in NC..
Hillary knows it, she felt it last night. So you should just go with the flow and Smile pretty.

Posted by: IF SHE ONLY KNEW | May 3, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

im an obama supporter but booing her was not nice. however all you obama haterz out there i hope your prepared to vote 4 mcsame if hill is not the nominee i would prefer that u change your mines and except the truth obama will bring positive change to the world

Posted by: derwin cange | May 3, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

-African American base which is the Democratic party’s souland destroy it. Don’t even dare.-
Really? You think you can win an election nationally without the all the other demographic groups? You think you are more important than latinos, whites, asians, women, men, working class, etc? Yeah, see how that works out for you when we deflect to McCain.. if you keep threatening us with that horse manure. All democratic base groups are important, yours no more so than any other.

Posted by: Angry Democratic Woman | May 3, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Hillary has moved so far right to appeal to voters in PA, Ohio and NC. True, they are voting for her in the primary but in the general, the white blue collar crowd will go with McCain. Her electability argument is ridiculous. She will lose the liberal base, the black vote and the disillusioned young vote in November.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

At least Clinton had the guts to talk to them… and Bill O’Reilly. All Obama can do it give canned speeches.. he sucks in debates and O’Reilly would eat him for lunch. YOu LIberals are being HAD.

Posted by: A reader in Georgia | May 3, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

yes, double standards for the Clinton supporters. they are attacking Obama supporters all over but when we “attack back” oh well then we have no class.
WE HAVE CLASS because we are not being lead with in a ring in our noses supporting Clinton like deer in the headlights, and we have done our research and found Clinton to be a liar and Obama more experience in elected office than she has had.
I won’t vote for a woman who will damage our country, democrat or not. She is aweful for the country
Obama 08

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Hope and courage are more than crucial virtues: they are the very engine that encourages
others to join a common endeavour that can take on powerful opponents. And this dynamic creates a great deal more than particular benefits for individual citizens. It recognises that they themselves possess the ultimate liberty: the political liberty of designing their common future. Is it any wonder Obama is so wildly appreciated by the powerless, by people across parties, and especially by the younger generation of Americans?
Another attribute of Obama’s technique is that once this common process is initiated, creative answers to obstacles do not emerge only from the strategy room at the top of the campaign but also from a much larger arena of action, where organised structures at every level constantly produce new solutions.
This is the precise strategy that Obama would bring
into Washington in November, and into the White House
in January. For the ideology of Obama is,
historically, a successful strategy to overcome
entrenched, powerful interests through popular
mobilisation. It is neither a bottom-up nor top-down process but something larger than the sum of both, working both inside and outside national institutions towards a common goal.

Posted by: bruce becker | May 3, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Hillary booed? Her supporters complain? Poor babies! I guess if you can’t stand the heat…

Posted by: Demetrius | May 3, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

They would not bomb us, they will despise for phony clintons.
ALL THE WORLD is looking at us ib US for new, greater pass to future with Obama.And certainly not back to 90th, where phony calls to go.
ALL THE WORLD know ckintons dirt. That dirt does not matter much for them, but does for us, and they think – how Greatest Country in the World can accept that dirt and let it develope.
Clintonists, why do you have such a great desire to be fooled?

Posted by: LINDA,FL | May 3, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

DCVOTER Evaluate this contest on the basis of its actual rules. Michigan doesnt count because Clinton’s people voted in the DNC committee, not to count it.
If this were the general election, both candidates would use different strategies. Clinton’s strategies have failed, in this actual contest, which is not based on electoral votes, but on delegates. Guam voted today. They dont get electoral votes. They do get 4 elected delegate votes and 5 super delegate votes. However Clinton promised them that if she is elected, they will get electoral votes. Want to know how she will keep that promise? So do the 800,000 residents of Washington DC. do you get electoral votes? She lied, again.

Posted by: bruce becker | May 3, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Nice job Obama supporters in NC. That kind of behavior may play well in Obama’s church or the hood, but not in small town American.

Posted by: geevill | May 3, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Remember this DNC – There are no superdelegate in November. Yet FLorida and Michigan do vote in November.

Posted by: geevill | May 3, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Obama is so far removed from reality and the working class. We would save more than a mere 30cents if the gas tax were temporarily suspended. Out here in the southwest we must drive everywhere. People are paying $100 or more per week for gasoline just to drive to work!!!
Milk is over $4 per gallon, bread $3+ per loaf, eggs $2.40 per dozen. Get real Obama – any relief – even if from gasoline tax will be helpful!!!

Posted by: GrannySunni | May 3, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

with hillary winning all the big important states it is time for barack obama to admit his loss and get out of the race. enough is enough!

Posted by: andrea | May 3, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Matt: Gritty phoniness is more like it. In California she played to the left wing anti war crowd. In PA she was the home girl beer slugger. In NC she brings on the southern drawl. There is absolutely nothing genuine about this woman. She plays to the crowd of the day. She won NJ by 10 and now the NJ polls are saying the state is strongly in favor of Obama. She doesn’t know who she is. She’s a terrible role model for women. Some values – her husband publicly humiliated her. What has she accomplished on her own? She rode her husband’s coattails into the Senate just as she’s trying to ride them into the White House. If Bill wasn’t campaining in the south with his noticeably heavier southern drawl trying to appeal to the Bubba vote, she wouldn’t have a shot down there. She’s a pathetic panderer.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Hillary can’t win now, even if she paid everyone to vote for her. Which that would probably be one of her tactics. Yeah I want a president with those kind of scrupples.

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

I’ve been reading these blogs and it is pathetic. Voting for a republican on either side just to spite the other side is crazy. People are at war dying for real. And when it comes to HRC or BO no one here really knows either one of them. Just what they have heard. Can anyone here really say they can see whats in the canidates hearts?

Posted by: Free thinker | May 3, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

I agree with denise 100%
If Hillary had never married Bill Clinton who would vote for her?
Obama is his own person.

Posted by: Martha Gomez | May 3, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Cauchy: the PAUL v. CLINTON case is exactly the reason the super delegates are trending towards Obama. Hillary got a pass when the California judge postponed the trial until after the election. This is an election fraud case pertaining to her Senate campaign and there is a lot of hard evidence. The super delegates know it’s coming.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

You know, I am personally offended by Obama saying that people won’t benefit very much from the gas tax relief. How out of touch he is. Has he considered struggling truckers? Has he considered the people who live paycheck to paycheck? He insults people by telling them this idea is a “shell game.”
What is he doing to help anyone? I’m sick of his arrogance and his snobby demeanor. He does not represent me or anyone I know and I will never support him.

Posted by: ed gibbs | May 3, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Free thinker:
The reason I will vote Republican if Obama is not the nominee is that right now we are in war and McCain would probably continue that but I see it as a lesser evil than Hillary getting in and making deals and lying behind our backs like the tie they have with Columbia they swept under the rug and the Peter Paul case going on that I know McCain’s camp will drudge up in the election. She would cause more harm than good to our country because she is deceitful and would be causing mistrust in other leaders of other countries and putting us at a greater risk for other wars. Just because she’s a Dem doesn’t mean she’s right for the job. You can’t lie to another country and then say oops I must have been tired that day. They won’t accept that. She will harm our country and that’s why it’ better to vote Republican if she gets nominated.
Obama 08

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I agree Bill. And let me add, I am a Republican for change.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Pamela:
I understand what you are saying. I should have been more specific. I am referring to those who are blinded and stuck on either HRC or BO simply because it is fashionable right now. Republicans are thrilled about mccain but will still fight and lie to the end to have him elected.

Posted by: Free thinker | May 3, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

The Clintons had their shot. Hillary had two terms in Bill’s presidency and two terms in the Senate to get health care right and she didn’t deliver — Just as she didn’t deliver jobs to upstate New York as she promised. I supported Bush early on and he totally botched the war. I think it’s time to try something new. I say what do we have to lose by giving Obama a shot?

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

I completely agree with the poster who told that moderate rationally thinking democrats (I and my friends belong there) have to abandon this radical left wing Dem Party hijacked by ultra leftists like Howard Dean, Nancy Pelossi and create a new Democratic Conservative Party. I and my friends join it immediately and we’ll see how those who left with such leaders and loosers Dean, Ted Kennedy, Kerry and others will be doing. CNN, MSNBC and other supported them media will help them how it helping them now showing up untrustful, unexperienced, phony Obama through our throats.
Moderate, democratic oriented, rationally thinking people join!
And we will take Clintons our leaders!
They showed such disrespect tryi

Posted by: trish | May 3, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

did anyone watch the speech? clinton supporters LEFT THE VENUE after her speech! they weren’t even there for barack’s speech! talk about being disrespectful & closed-minded!
white middle-aged woman for barack in ‘o8/’12!!!

Posted by: cmolson | May 3, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

For the person who is trying to give Hillary props for making a speech in front of “Obama supporters”… do you not realize that this was supposed to be a crowd representing the full spectrum of the Democratic Party in NC and not an “Obama crowd” per se? The fact that she got that cold and even rude reception is an indication that the NC voters in general have rejected her.

Posted by: Cari | May 3, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Let me begin by saying that I am not anti-hillary. However, at this point why is she still running. Anyone who believes at this point hillary is running for anyone besides hillary is delusional. She wants the rules changed and has a sense of entitlement that is disturbing.Last october when she thought she had the nomination before the voting began she was arrogant and smug. Now shes just desperate and willing to do and say whatever it takes. Based on DNC rules as they stand she CAN NOT win. But every week she saying if you do this and move that I somehow win. If nothing else we must have rules and based on rules……she’s out.

Posted by: Free thinker | May 3, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Saying people aren’t voting for Obama because of his mixed heritage is just obscene. I hear a lot of this whiney complaining by Obama people but I don’t hear many people accuse non-Clinton supporters of not voting for her because she is a woman. With Obama, it’s always blame it on race, blame it on race.

Posted by: Jackie,nc | May 3, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Change, Change, Change, LOL, Obama & his backers are brain-dead. You would think by these days that ppl would finally know to NEVER trust “great talkers” which is all Obama is. Is NC that far behind in years? Oops…That already been proven. Obama is no leader, Though must be given much credit for being a wonderful whiner (That will sure make for a great President),But then that will never happen anyway because if that whiner is picked, Then we lose ALL chances of winning against McCain. Clinton WILL rip McCain apart, & all you dense hard-headed Obama backers need to really think twice, Though once again, Your to dense to see reality. Oh, & you better believe Clinton will get Indiana. AND BY THE WAY, As someone mentioned “Why won’t the talker go in front of Clinton supporters?”..Obama run a country..WHAT A JOKE. Yeah, Just what we need, Another joke…..Go Hillary!..Obama know’s where he can go. Hey, Can the Obama backers of NC even actually spell his complete name?? LOL.

Posted by: Keith | May 3, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Whoever said Obama is the reincarnate of JFK- what a horrible, horrible thing to say.

Posted by: MAfrank | May 3, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Hillary supporters– don’t be hypocritical. Hillary flung mud at Obama during the last debate, and has repeatedly belittled him on national TV, while elevating McCain. So much for respect. I’m sure you were all applauding those shows.

Posted by: Christine | May 3, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Keith: “Can the Obama backers of NC even actually spell his complete name”
Last time I checked it was Obama who is winning the educated vote. The Clintons prefer to use the condescending approach and take for granted that they can brainwash the average voter.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

MAFrank–I agree. Saying Obama is anything like JFK or as some have claimed, MLK, defames the memory of those two great men.
Obama the next JFK? Couldn’t be farther form the truth!

Posted by: Sandy in PA | May 3, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Wow, reading all these posts is scary. Way to much hate.
The Clinton’s have been liers for a very long time, anyone who believes the gas tax holiday is anything more then a sound bit then thinks the policies over the last 8 years were good ones.Why is Hillary calling all the sleaze from the republican media friends? Please people not another 4 years of corperate ownership of the USA government, please.

Posted by: kim | May 3, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I agree with you fivepin. I will not tell anyone who to vote for because that is un-american. I will only say please be responsible and remember the bigger picture. Only vote for who you TRULY believe to be the best can.didate

Posted by: Free thinker | May 3, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

truth, what kind of change are you talking about? Sounds like more buzz words to me. “Put down your daggers and sword”? The “old powerbase of the world is shifting”? Sounds like we are all going to disarm immediately. What in the heck are you talking about? Sounds like Rev. Wright must be leading the way. He and Farrakan. It might help if you have some specifics to explain what you are talking about.

Posted by: georgia | May 3, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Georgia:
You seem to be stuck on media hype. Rev. Wright is not running. Focus.

Posted by: Free thinker | May 3, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

How People cannot see that CLINTON Is PART Of the Problem Is Beyond me..We Need a President who Has NOT Been Heavily Influenced by Washington and By Politics in General..We Need NEW Ideas and a New Attitude.To Break down the Barriers Between Races and Between Cultures and to STOP Feeding the People of America all the the BS Rhetoric that has been shoveled down out Throats since as long as I Can remember..My Support and My Vote will be going to OBAMA and anyone who is tired of the “Same Old,Same Old” From Washington I Urge you to do the same.We need to think of Our Future and Barrack Obama is the Man to Insure that we’ll HAVE A Future.

Posted by: Wholf | May 3, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

And for those who will vote for Hillary:
What is going to happen when she is president and then she get convicted in the Paul case? Will she run her presidency from a prison cell?
They have her on tape with hard evidence that confirms she is a liar. Wake up Democrats. Don’t vote for Hillary just because she is a Democrat. Think abut our country’s well fair and not the false illusion of Hillary. It’s better to vote Republican than to finish off the country with Hillary.
Obama for President 08

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

You know what…Im white mid. class and just want every 1 to know since that super tuesday in feb. would not be the same outcome if done today. No 1 and I mean no 1 here likes, can stand, or would vote for Hillary. I wish she would shut the F%$Ck UP…… 80% of what she ses is lies, and the rest she is a hypocritical. By the time this is over she will have destroyed any political car. she might of otherwise had. Hillary folowers are just a bunch of bitter old white women, and racist cowards who say they are not racist, but act totaly diferent……. Old politics, old beliefs, and old news. The peaple are sick of this crap and we are takeing back our government. Obama for president…

Posted by: Brian S | May 3, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Reading about the unbelievably rude, “my way or the highway”, “Saint Obama” attitude of the Obama supporters induced me to make another financial contribution to Hillary’s campaign. My husband is doing the same. Hillary’s courage, fortitude, experience and intelligence are astounding. The Obama supporters’ rudeness warmed the cockles of my heart as it is abundantly clear that Obama’s supporters are very worried. They should be worried. The tide has turned. Hillary is going to win the nomination and the Presidency and the U.S. and the rest of the world will be all the better for it.

Posted by: Rebecca | May 3, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Bill Clinton looked into the eyes of the American public and flat out lied about his sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky. Hillary Clinton looked into the eyes of the American media and absolutely LIED about coming under sniper fire which was a real slap in the face of the men and women who wear the military uniform. Her daughter Chelsea Clinton echoed that lie in defense of her mother’s in defensible statement. This is a family that lies together.
America has had to endure 16 years of liars in the White House including the current president who LIED to get us in to an occupation for oil not a war for democracy. Isn’t it time for a change? She deserved a good booing and she got it. I think it took class and courage for those attending the dinner to say to the world we are sick and tired of the lies and we will not stand for it anymore. Her support of McCain’s gas tax is a lie on the American public and once again she’s been busted.
So long Clinocchio! Obama 2008 and 2012.
The death of a racism has begun. AMEN!!!

Posted by: Sandra | May 3, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Do you all realize that the same ppl that you are critizing is just yourself but only @ a dinner? You all need what ever form of religious God you have to guide your seedy minds to peace. The hatred in here is just horrible and a nation can not heal with ppl being so hatful toward each other. I love Obama but to call him the messiah is far reaching, there is only one messiah and he has come and gone ppl. Remember what worshipping another God did to the world before, seems that it headed the same way again. What you all need to be doing is praying for healing, peace and inner most tranquility for accept things for what is planned.

Posted by: Edwina | May 3, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Obama is a much more of a class act than Hillary, and that is the whole point. Obama supporters aren’t running for president and they have been insulted over and over again by the Clinton’s. Many Obama supporters were Clinton supporters and defended them through a lot of BS, and just because we find Barack Obama more suitable to be president than her they say we’re delusional and easily fooled! Bosnia, N. Ireland, NAFTA, Sir Edmund Hillary, Gas Tax Holiday…add it up! Hillary is a pandering, calculating liar!!
There are more people in the Clinton camp who won’t vote for Barack Obama. Your reasoning never points to what he has said or done, but what his former pastor is presently saying. That he was on a board with someone who was a radical when he was younger in the 60′s, when Obama was a little kid. Clinton has her connections too, and if she somehow gets the nomination, you will see a bunch of BS coming her way, and I think you will want and need the Obama supporters help in defeating John McCain. God help us if McCain becomes president!

Posted by: Dustin | May 3, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

And for those who will vote for Hillary:
What is going to happen when she is president and then she get convicted in the Paul case? Will she run her presidency from a prison cell?
They have her on tape with hard evidence that confirms she is a liar. Wake up Democrats. Don’t vote for Hillary just because she is a Democrat. Think abut our country’s well fair and not the false illusion of Hillary. It’s better to vote Republican than to finish off the country with Hillary.
Obama for President 08

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

You cannot argue or explain to people when all they focus on is the color of skin. Never mind that his background and character and core beliefs are minimal. Please, please think about what America needs and it certainly is not Obama.

Posted by: virginia | May 3, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

You cannot argue or explain to people when all they focus on is the color of skin. Never mind that his background and character and core beliefs are minimal. Please, please think about what America needs and it certainly is not Obama.

Posted by: virginia | May 3, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Peter 10:11 am – Nice try but I didn’t buy it. Many of those who read your comments probably formed an opinion and went no further. Well, I went to that site and actually READ the entire article. You essentially re-iterated the e-rumor portion of the article that has been circulating. You failed to disclose that the body of article pretty much debunks this inuendo and speculative garbage.

Posted by: CNL | May 3, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Clinton is being booed because she has spent the last month insulting Obama supporters. It goes like this. By stating that Obama is only good at speeches and has no substance, she is implying that his supporters are a bunch of dummies who are easily swayed by words. That bugs me.

Posted by: Phaedrus | May 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Shrinking Violet? Nawww. Venus Fly Trap, maybe!
Governor Easy deserves the boos — should have known better than to back her!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | May 3, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

History all over the place. Let the rest of us who have little to lose watch Americans and the Dem. Party author their own epitaph. They way you’re going, both Clinton and Barack might fall to race an/or gender; the entire US to the certain incompetence that McCain represents.

Posted by: QED | May 3, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

For shame to all of us. Let’s not lose sight of the goal- to end the destructive policies that have desecrated our country and created fiascos abroad. The differences in positions between Barack and Hillary are not worth the vitriol in the face of what could be a difficult challenge from McSame. Let’s not do his work for him. Come on people. Let’s come together, support your candidate and save our country- not tear down each other.

Posted by: Larry | May 3, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!
==================
WHO’S ELECTABLE IN GENERAL ELECTIONS
AGAINST REPUBLICANS????????
DO A FAIR ANALYSIS STATE BY STATE.
YOU MUST GET 270 ELECTORAL VOTES TO
WIN THE WHITE HOUSE.
ANSWER!!!!!!!!!!!
==================
OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE IN GENERAL
ELECTIONS.I KNOW HE HAS TOTAL SUPPORT
FROM THE BLACKS,BUT THE BLACK VOTE
ISN’T ENOUGH TO GET 270 ELECTORAL
VOTES IN GENERAL ELECTIONS.
McCAIN OR HILLARY HAVE A BETTER CHANGE
TO GET THOSE 270 ELECTORAL VOTES IN
GENERAL ELECTIONS,BECAUSE THEY CAN
UNITE DIFFERENT GROUPS OF VOTERS.
CONCLUSION:
===============
OBAMA IS THE ONLY ONE WITH ZERO
ELECTABILITY.

Posted by: NIcholas | May 3, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Time for a change. The days of dirty tricks is over. This does not bode very well for Hillary’s last chance…superdelegates when she is booed and heckled at a Democratic Party Dinner. I for one won’t miss her.
Obama in ’08
James

Posted by: James | May 3, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

GO HILLARY GO. FROM THE GREAT STATE OF OHIO.WE ARE BEHIND YOU.
YOU PEOPLE WHO IS TRYING TO DOWN THE CLINTONS ARE CRAZY. YOU SEE WHAT A FIGHTER SHE IS.THATS HOW SHE WILL FIGHT FOR UYOU AND ME.REMEMBER THE ONES OF YOU WHO ARE THROWING STONES DON’T LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES YOURSELF.
SHES THE ONE TO LEAD THIS COUNTRY TO SOME SANITY.

Posted by: SCUBBY | May 3, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

No shrinking violet is an understatement. This woman has demonstrated a ruthless urge to power and a willingness to morph herself into any form to get the office. When, naturally, she will revert to her arrogant, smug, lockhaw smirky stonewalling dishonesty. Compared by one writer to a vampire, the worst form of quid pro quo. Whatever she wins is stolen and not for the greater good. If she steals the nomination I will write Obama’s name in November.

Posted by: Gaias Child | May 3, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

CNL:
If you go on do more research you will find that they are bringing the case back up because there is hard evidence on tape that Clinton can’t get out of. Sure the guy may have been a convict but for one thing, that doesn’t mean he didn’t get one pulled over on him by the Clintons and two, why are were Clintons doing business with a four time convicted felon in the first place? Where were their priorities? Obvioulsy money and not the American people.
Obama for pres 2008 and 2012

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

I am not a Democrat or a Republican, I am an American. I am still undecided as to who I will be voting for. CLinton has lied to many times for me to trust her. McCain wants to keep things as they are, He isn’t for America, he is for the Corporations and how much money they can earn for him. Obama has some good ideas, but without the backing of the House AND Senate he won’t see those ideas into reality. Why can’t we get a candidate that doesn’t pit the 2 parties against each other, A candidate that is for America? Like every other election year it will come down to voting for the candidate that will do the LEAST damage to this country. Maybe next election year we can find an American that is for America.

Posted by: A Better place in OK | May 3, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Fred:
black liberation theology was written back in 1969. I also remember some harsh words and acts from all races in 1969. Let the past go. I believe in America and most importantly I believe in GOD. not in any man or woman to change my life.

Posted by: Free thinker | May 3, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

David,
I am a 48 yo white woman and I agree with Ms. Obama. We are a mean country and that’s why Obama would be good for the country because they aren’t living in a bubble and living in denial. America is not perfect and they want to change that. We are bitter after the Clinton and Bushes administrations that slowly took brought our country down. Clinton didn’t do anything for the country It was the administration set before that ran out country he just happen to be in at a time it was running.

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

WOW! 2007 and still a black vs. white country. To all of you ranting about the “black liberation theology” here is a news flash WHITE MEN HAVE ALWAYS BEEN LIBERATED! White men still run this country and evrything in it. Oh and by the way I am as white as they come.
Heaven forbid minorities (including women) would threaten that coveted postiton. Get over it America look at the man not the skin. I usually vote republican, but they didn’t give me a candidate to vote for this year so I am looking hard at both of these candidates on the day to day. I had enough of the Clintons in their first term and would be devasted is Hilbill is elected. She is negetive, a liar and fakes like she gives a damn about the poor and impoverished. PLEASE people this is your wake up call, stop hitting the snooze button. If she had any diginity or cared about her own party she would put on her pant suit, call a press conference and wave the white flag. The division it is causing in the Democratic Party may very well send John McCain to the White House.
One last comment.I work on average 50-60 hours a week to provide a home, food GAS, and insurance for my family. The government doesn’t owe any of us anything. If you want insurance get off your behind and if you have to get a second job to do it, then do it. Pick up a book at the free public library and educate yourself so you can move up in the world. Stop having kids you can’t afford and don’t have the time or effort to properly parent. That is how you end poverty.

Posted by: Pam | May 3, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

“If she steals the nomination I will write Obama’s name in November.”
Ditto that. If she steals it a large percentage of the electorate will vote on principal. If you can’t elect a nominee based on the party rules, then the system is broken. She didn’t think all 50 states mattered early in her campaign and she still doesn’t think they do.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

I watch the Jefferson dinner ceremony and I heard Hillary and Gov Easley being booed but ABC the only one is telling American people how NC feel about the both of them they have put some much negative about Obama and the people are fed up with negative attacks and thats why they were booed and when Hillary was speaking they were chanted Obama, Obama this what American people should see this how people are leaning towards Obama but CNN, Fox, MSNBC is not reporting this because they want Hillary to win and not Obama Thanks ABC for reporting this story

Posted by: Tom | May 3, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Obama says it’s time for change, well the only change I see will be made is that a black person will be in the white house instead of a white person. He has not defined change yet. People wake up let change be about what the county needs not what color is in the house. If you go to a black store there prices is higher than any othe stores.
Don’t be fooled by color, loke around you and see who hurts you the most in your areas. Let’s be for real, come out of the dark. Obama should go on O’reily to show the people how he can stand toe to toe with the man. Hillary
did and Mr. O’Reily just knew he was going to break her and to his surprise he couldn’t after a second try. The women don back down and that’s the kind of leader we need.

Posted by: Queen | May 3, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Free thinker, you just think that the slate is wiped clean with the little ploy Wright and Obama used to ditch him. He is who he is–the sum of all his parts, which includes 20 years of listening to his spiritual mentor, old uncle, officiate for his wedding, baptism for his children, the inspiration in his book. I am in focus on all of the issues. Some of us do think instead of starry-eyed dreaming with thoughts of our pied piper Obama.
As for telling Hillary to get out, you have been doing that for a long time. There is a Democrat Party process in place, and too many of you want the process to stop at the point you choose. Many voters still have not voted in the primaries, and that will not settle the disenfranchisement of all of the voters in Michigan and Florida. Obama could have remedied that, but he didn’t. He took his name off of the Michigan ballot because he knew he would not win. He also knew that Florida would not give him a win. He would not settle for new primaries in those states. He prefers caucuses where he can bring in first-time voters and intimidate other voters to get him the delegates he has gotten.
“Delusional….sense of entitlement”? You surely must be referring to Obama, who did not complete his first Senate term, has almost no experience, has little knowledge on the issues, except what he has copied or had written for him. Even when it comes to so called inspiring speech, he copies without telling anyone it is not his inspirational words, but a speech already given by Deval Patrick. How dumb is that?
I am focussed, alright. I want a leader with substantial knowledge of the issues, a work ethic represented by 35 years of working on the issues that help workers, children and their families, and I definitely want someone with plenty of relevant experience. That is Hillary Clinton. If she is not the nominee, McCain will win. He does have plenty of experience for making decisions for the security of this country. He is a moderate who has worked across the aisle, even going against Bush and his majority. I get it. Obama is not ready, he is green.
Let the primary and Convention process continue. “Based on the DNC rules as they stand”, what in the heck are you talking about?

Posted by: georgia | May 3, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

I live in NJ and I am an Obama supporter. What I said was that Hillary’s electability argument won’t work. You obviously haven’t read all of my posts. I despise the Clintons and have had enough of Bush. I am a Republican for change – and that would be Obama.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Since when is Bill O’Reilly God and if you can be on his show and talk back to him make you the candidate of choice.
Let’s vote for someone who is not a liar and tied to money and power making schemes like the clintons
Obama for pres!!

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Doreen, how exactly has Obama been rude.

Posted by: lisa | May 3, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Hillary has done a great job “swiftboating” herself with stephanoupolous.
Party leaders know who has experience and judgment, so do the people

Posted by: chaz | May 3, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Clinto wouldn’t give a speech in front of Obama supporters, THINKING…?!?
You mean democrats in NC. That’s where they were.
Whadya think PA was and he was never jeered because he’s a gentleman.

Posted by: mcj | May 3, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Hillary has earned each and every boo.

Posted by: Joh Galt | May 3, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

I don’t care who votes for who if people are disgusted they boo!! Anyway Hannity is full of hate for Obama and it shows. He is sure stuck on stupid!! Real journalist don’t act like that. He keeps repeating the same thing over and over again like a broken record! I am surprised that people would listen to such garbage. Some folks on Fox are softer towards Hillary now when they know they don’t like her. They are playing mind games with people so that they can vote for her and then when she becomes the democratic nominee really turn on her in the general elections and defeat her so they think. Go figure!! I don’t get why peple are soo easily brain washed and wait for people like Hannity or Oreilly to think for them. Look at the real issues in America and choose the right person. By the way experience is not everything. Look at America now, is Bush not experienced?? Look at the mess he made!! I am not American but I know people like Obama can change this country and take it to new heights. Think!!

Posted by: Namone Mwenyo | May 3, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Barack Obama, is the truest, most sincere, and honest politician to ever grace the earth. This is our chance. The way to freedom. Take back our country. March Forward.

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 3, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

John: You say she didn’t know about Bill and Monica. Did she know about Paula Jones, Kathleen Wiley or Juanita Broderick? I guess she’s not the smartest woman in the world after all. But then again, she did fail the DC Bar. What Bill did with that intern would be considered sexual harassment at any corporation in America.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Denise, you forgot Jennifer Flowers.

Posted by: lisa | May 3, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

I keep hearing of experience can someone define this for me. None of these candidates have ever been president so they dont have the experience. My dad was in the military over 20 years so i was around it all my life. Can i now claim 20 years of military experience since i was there and around it?

Posted by: Free thinker | May 3, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Guam is the trend and North Carolina and Indiana the end. Destiny awaits. Rise all Americans and say “Yes WE Can”. Feel the love, get close and feel Barack Obama. trust me, your lives will change forever. Don’t get left behind.

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 3, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Lisa: LOL – How could I forget Jennifer Flowers. Hillary is the worst possible role model for women everywhere. She allowed herself to be publicly humiliated. The fact that she is where she is because of her husband should speak volumes to woman across this country who have made great strides on their own merit. Who was Hillary’s opponent in her last Senate race? A 70 year old former mayor of Yonkers. Big win!

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Warren5678, Get real….Obama is a politician. As a politician he is cut from the same cloth as McCain or Clinton. They will say just about anything and do just about anything to win your vote. In my opinion, when judging politicians (especially in the same party) it is who do you trust more. No politician deserves complete trust in my mind. With all that said, I believe Obama is more trustworthy than the Clintons who have at least 30 years with of lies and political pandering in their background. I do believe Obama provides an opportunity for change while Clintons are more of the same old crap we’ve seen the last 20 years starting with the first George Bush.

Posted by: indy_voter | May 3, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

It’s amazing! the amount of hate in this contry is overwhelming. Unfortunately, we don’t even recognize our own ability to discriminate. Some of you are blatantly hateful toward people who are not like you and disrespectful to people who do not profess what you believe in. America has a long way to go.
Change is imminent. Whether we like it or not it is going to happen. Experience does not count for anything because nobody in the democratic race has any experience. Just being in the White House does not confer experience. George Bush was in the White House while his father had the most experience in the White House. He has been dubbed the worse president of the United States. Let us all chill. God has a plan for the United States but the United States are just too involved in themselves to even think about the will of God. They use God to get their way, then they do eveything that is evil. That is how the evil spirit works. After all, didn’t the people of God voted for George Bush? Hasn’t he spread hope and good will to all human being? Oh! I’m sorry. That will be McCain because he said we will never again go to the middle East for oil – never killing our 18 YO children for oil while mothers are here praying for their children to comeback home safely. How about the Iraqi people? Who will held responsible for their death because Americans are so power – and oil – hungry? Weren’t our troops defending our freedom there? Al Qaeda, weapons of mass destructions? Oh! No! McCain said it: “It was for oil”. May God have pity on us all!

Posted by: Margaret | May 3, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Unbelievable. I cannot believe the poor form of the crowd. They booed one of their own candidates? Save it for Republicans! Who are these morons?

Posted by: mojopo | May 3, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

NOBODY TALKS ABOUT THE MOST IMPORTANT
ISSUE:
ELECTABILITY IN NOVEMBER.
WHO’S ELECTABLE IN GENERAL ELECTIONS???
DO THE MATH…..
YOU NEED 270 ELECTORAL VOTES TO WIN
THE WHITE HOUSE………

Posted by: NIcholas | May 3, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Texasdemocrat,
I feel the exact same way, except about Hillary Clinton, and I am a native New Yorker. If the rest of the country could see how she has done absolutely nothing for 8 years here!
She is a liar and a manipulator.
My husband and I both will leave the party should she be the nominee. This is based on her lack of ethical and moral character. We have seen first hand throughout this primary season what she, and her campaign are made of.
She has fooled many people. Just remember, when Bill Clinton was elected in 1990 we had a democratic Congress. by 1993 that was over. He lost it for us. Then Al Gore had to run with the glare of all the Clinton Scandals. the republicans talked about morality pointing to the lack of it by the Clintons. That is why he lost. I only hope it is not too late for people to really stop and think about what the Clintons really did for this country. Their behavior gave us 8 years of George Bush.

Posted by: Olga | May 3, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

All you Obama supporter, your boy may get the nomination, but he will never be President! Hillary has more supporters that rather vote for McCain than vote for Obama. The worse of two evils Obama or McCain. OBAMA!

Posted by: jp,michigan | May 3, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

jp, If Obama puts Bill Richardson on the ticket, he wins California, Texas, New Mexico and florida. New York will go for ANY democrat. New Jersey is presently polling for Obama over McCain. The big state argument doesn’t fly.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

How rude and disrespectful to “boo” a Democrat governor just because he’s supporting Clinton and then to chant Obama’s name while Hillary is speaking, especially while she’s saying that she will support him if he’s the nominee. The cult of Obama talks about unity and healing and working together with all kinds of people but are actually quite divisive and combative. They act like spoiled little brats who start to scream if they think their candy might get taken away.

Posted by: Matt | May 3, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

These people are the reason Obama will not get the support of Hillary supporters if he is the nominee. Very pathetic people.

Posted by: dgh | May 3, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

And Hillary reared her ugly head….
That is what the stories will read in centuries to when our children’s children will read if Hillary gets nominated.
The rest of the story???……
And then the country was devastated and ruined because of her lies and deceitfulness. The American public had buyer’s remorse before the last one became extinct.
Don’t vote for a president worse than the one we have now, namely Hillary.

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

All I know is that if Sam Nunn, a respected statesman from the southern state of Georgia, is supporting Obama, that’s good enough for me.

Posted by: Denise | May 3, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Putting Bill Richardson on the ticket with Obama will not get the Latino support. They consider Bill a traitor

Posted by: dgh | May 3, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Obama supporters are opening up wounds from 2000 where the republicans acted this way sending buses in to boo AL GORE that is why I will never cast my vote for Obama you never see Clinton Supporters doing this and there are millions. Obama supporters are rude and have no manners IMO.

Posted by: Bishop | May 3, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Oh and Marie, McCain wants to keep us in a senseless war with no end in sight. How many thousands more will die because of the republicans.

Posted by: lisa | May 3, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I watched the N.C. Democratic Party dinner on cspan last night. I am not surprised that the Obama supporters boo’d Hillary and chanted Obamas name when she gave her speech. It shows you that most of his supporters are young kids who still don’t know what it is like to have class and be respectful. I guess it is hard to learn that when you don’t find that in your candidate of choice(with Obama flipping Hillary off in a speech he gave after her PA Primary double digit win). I personally witnessed Obama supporters being rude to a Clinton surrogate. Sean Astin was a surrogate that atteneded my district convention and while he was talking in general about the democrats he was boo’d because he supported Hillary. I did not agree or like everything Obamas surrogate said but me along with the other Hillary supporters sat there and listened and when we agreed we clapped and when we didn’t we just sat there. I hope going forward supporters can get more class. What they are forgetting is their candidate of choice might win the democratic nomination but without the hillary supporters joining in to vote for him in a general election the election just may go to John McCain. Please think before you act because it does reflect badly on your candidate of choice. You are in a way representing him with your voice and through your actions.

Posted by: Erika | May 3, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Let’s face it. It is all about race and most blacks back Obama only because he is black and they are still trying to get revenge for something this generation of whites had nothing to do with … slavery. I’ve seen the Associated Press quote black Americans as saying Barrack is getting votes only because of his race yet when Geraldine Ferraro say it, OMG! The country has a kanipchen fit.
Go home Barrack. Hillary has the experience to turn this country around.

Posted by: diane | May 3, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Are you aware that Bill Clinton invited Reverend Wright to the White House in 1998 and there are pictures of Clinton shaking hands with him that are easily assessible online? Why haven’t these pictures and their relationship which was sufficient to elicit an invitation to the White House being publicized? Of even more concern is Bill Clinton’s instructions to the police at one campaign stop to prevent the press from joining the crowd of spectators so that they would not be able to record the questions and the answers he gave in response. Other than a bit of confusion the press is not presenting this for what it is – since when did Bill Clinton have the right to restrict freedom of the press. But more alarming is the lack of reaction by the press – if Obama had employed these illegal tactics the press (FOX) in particular would have been infuriated.

Posted by: Weber | May 3, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Pam:
You are right. Killing is wrong except in self-defense. I don’t want to be a party ro any of it. I guess I really can’t vote at all in good conscience.

Posted by: Marie | May 3, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

I find it interesting that people who want the votes from Florida and Michigan do not acknowledge that in one of the states her name was the only name on the ballot. Also in both states since the DNC told them not to…no other candidate campaign in either state. So OF COURSE she won both states. Because she didn’t play by the rules set by the DNC, unfortunate those votes shouldn’t count.
From UndecidedNC.

Posted by: Undecided in NC | May 3, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

what’s funny is how a lot of Hillary supporters on this post are condemning the people at the dinner for booing Hillary, but it’s you same people who bad mouth on this post. What’s worse, hiding behind your keyboard, or actively showing your discontent for one and support for the other, without the conspiracy of plants or paid seat-fillers. what’s really sad is that, as much as I can’t stand Hillary and her tactics, the thought of arguably another 4 years of Bush policies is worse. I truly hope by November, we can all realize what is truly at stake in this election. I’d like to also touch base on Wright. He truly showed himself to be quite a weirdo this past weekend, but I challenge any of you to recall what your pastor, priest, rabbi, etc. said last Sunday. How about last month? How about 5 years ago when the last of these controversial statements was said. I don’t condone what he said, but really who of you are really a bunch of robots who heed all the words of your church? Who agrees with everything they hear? Who out there doesn’t have the ability to think for themselves. Anyone who doesn’t take a man for his word does not truly believe in themselves. I trust Obama is a man of his word and appreciate his conviction in not stooping to a lower level as Clinton has chosen

Posted by: mack | May 3, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

I also wondering how many people who say that aren’t going to vote for the other democratic nominee that wins…they instead will vote for McCain…how many of those people voted for Bush? Just wondering!
Still Undecided in NC

Posted by: Undecided in NC | May 3, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

One last thing…I think a sign of intelligence is when a poster reseraches from a credible source information before posting it. That is all.
Still undecided and saddened by all the disrespect and hate we have in this world for each other.

Posted by: Undecided in NC | May 3, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Oh,
And before the feminists accuse me of mistreating women, I want to clarify that when I said ‘that woman’ it only means ‘that one woman’ not ‘all women’.
And my idea of sending her to cook breakfast in Antarctica is only meant to ensure that she is given a lesson in humility and real hard-work, and not meant to portray women as cooks.
Contrary to popular belief, MEN don’t really rule in Latin America.
WOMEN are the ones who wear the pantalones here, even and when many are mistreated and trampled upon.
I do think it would be a good thing for the U.S. to have a woman in the Presidency of your country.
Just not this one.
Not one who lies and manipulates and consider herself royally entitled to everything her fancy tramples her eyes upon.
Clintons?
Bushes?
I mean, if you don’t want that Obama kid, fine!
Bring back John Edwards, or do consider that Bill Richardson dude for real, they are both honorable choices.
Stand up to the dance, Gringos.
Some of us in Latin America do want to see you all come out of that destructive haze you have been living in, so that you can see a better world for your children.
Your nation is an experiment going wrong, but you can still correct that, and the chance is here.
Get rid of the Clintons, Americans!

Posted by: Eldan | May 3, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

The vast majority of posts on this and other news sites makes depressing reading. Am I to take seriously the suggestion in many recent polls that there are Obama supporters and Clinton supporters who so detest the other Democratic Party contender (I’m ignoring the obvious RNC poseurs here and elsewhere whose posts are aimed at stirring up friction)that they would prefer to either support McKain or sit out the Presidential election rather than vote for the eventual nominee – if he or she isn’t YOUR candidate?
If this is so, then the USA definitely deserves a 3rd Bush term! And why stop there, let’s have a 4th Bush term while we are it! Let’s get our sons and daughters ready for another mindless war (you might want to chat with your local school board to include Parsi in the school’s foreign language department – but that’s just a thought). Let’s put off universal health care for another two presidential terms, let’s continue exporting jobs, let’s continue the decline in educational competitiveness… Let’s all buy shares in oil companies, defence contactors, HMOs…
What a shallow, self-serving attitude! Because of disagreements that primarily concern gender fears or racial fears, a sizeable proportion of our citizenry is prepared to put aside issues that we claim to hold dear – or just sit it out! What cowardice!
Whoever it was that said that a nation deserves the leadership it gets, was right. All the self-centred folks who wish to disguise their misogyny or racism (or however they they may prefer to dress it up – I really do not care) will deserve McKain/Bush… It is just a pity that the rest of us will be taken along too.

Posted by: Disgusted | May 3, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Hey Undecided!
I understand your sadness for all the hatred in this world, and stuff.
I totally get it.
BUT, don’t let that pain bring down the sun within.
That sun still out there, shining bright, bringing us a different dream.
Not all of it is hatred, Undecided.
There’s also good words and deeds happening all over the place, though you would be hard-pressed to find them on regular media, the broadcaster of hell.
If you wanted a small piece of advice from a little guy in Latin America, I’d tell you to chill out, and not to take Politics waaay too seriously.
If you’re in NC, I’ve been there, and that’s a cool place, either mountain or ocean are both good choices.
Perhaps you should move, and start anew, eh?
But since no one’s asking for my advice, then I better give none.
One thing I promise you, though: this world is not done yet, and hatred and evil will not conquer us, even when they sometimes appear to have the upper hand.
Our best dreams will still come forward, so you better get ready and fired up.
If you want to live to see it, I mean.

Posted by: Eldan | May 3, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

I find it amazing that we as american people can stand so divided when we should be on the same team. I have read of the democrats who say if no HC then go Mcain…come on are you serious? The long drawn out process of this whole thing is doing just what the other party hoped it would do. Separate and make enemies amongst us. Lets remember this please. No matter who becomes the nominee it is very important that we do not let this GWB nonsense continue.Let us not let anger and the “battle royale” between the two very powerful dems we have running for US separate US. No matter who is the nominee if you change parties based on anger,race,gender or who someones friends are, then remember you will have to live with that for the next four years.An angry vote could hurt not only your pocket but the financial outcome of alot of people.Those who dont have the money to have internet,newspaper,or telephone because gas is so high they cant afford it. So just remember when you do vote, your vote may also be the vote of the fellow american who couldnt.

Posted by: real34 | May 3, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

I am a proud Obama supporter. I note the hypocrisy in the Clinton supporters. The sound like Hillary whining about the boys beating up on her. Has it occurred to anyone that the folks booing Hillary are not “organized” booers, but just exercising their rights in this free country of ours to express themselves? I was in Philly when a group of Hillary supporters physically assaulted a lone Obama supporter. This is not folks exercising their rights, this is a criminal act. Hillary supporters’ behavior is moving into the criminal, but then, Hillary has a list of friends actually convicted of criminal activities. Do we really want a quarter century dynasty of Bushes and Clintons? Think about this.

Posted by: elysse | May 3, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Never Obama? ” I would rather vote Mccain instead of Obama.” How many of you have gone to college?

Posted by: donis georgiou | May 3, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Did it say anything about sniper fire that Hillary had to duck under or was it just people fed up with her lying, worn out, ’92, Karl Rovian tactics? I would have voted for her at one time, but she and her campaign, and ill advised supporters have ruined that. I guess I can see why she has the uneducated demographic in the palm of her hand. Hillary is part of the problme, not the solution.

Posted by: kasinca | May 3, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Hillary doesn’t even understand why the gas tax vacation is just a shell game (no pun intended). Why would we want a president who doesn’t understand that this idea creates even more problems for the country?

Posted by: JeezeLouise | May 3, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

I was there and that is not at all how it was — Clinton got great cheers. And her speech was oh so much better — she was strong and together. He was tired and gave the same old stump nonsense. You had to be there

Posted by: strawberryfeels | May 3, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Clinton supporters are living in delusion.
The Clintons have criminal connections that are being brought out more and more and her supporters are living in denial.

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

I for one do not want a Mafia type of president in the White House. If Hillary gets the nomination, I think a vote for McCain would be a much merciful death to our country than a vote for Hillary. I would not vote for her because of her affiliations to criminals and money laundering.
Obama for President

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

The court case that is pending in Paul vs. Clinton
What happens when they find her guilty? Will she run her presidency from a jail cell? There too much documentation that makes her guilty. Postponing the case until after the elections won’t change her guilt.
If the Clintons were on the up an up why would they do business with a 4 time convicted felon in the first place.
Oh well, they have many other times and the Clinton supporters are turning the other cheek. Just as long as Clintons can fill their pockets, why should we care whose president, right?
Obama for pres

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

jacksmith;
are you kidding, Clinton did not have a crushing defeat in PA. as a matter of fact Obama came within a single digit.
I think that if states who have voted already could vote again, more would vote for Obama

Posted by: Pamela | May 3, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

They weren’t booing Hillary they ere booing thier Gov. Stop spinning
Clinton also mentioned Gov. Mike Easley, who has endorsed her candidacy, and she was momentarily rendered speechless while the crowd booed him.

Posted by: PDC | May 3, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

the woman is fearless! while obama will not even debate her
22 debates is enouhg let get the primaries over

Posted by: PDC | May 3, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

bob:
real intelligent poster, you are!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!

Posted by: Jackt51 -- Vietnam Vet and Proud Liberal | May 3, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Last night on CNN 360 they reported on Obamas childhood. His mother had a prestige college education. He went to privite schools,& spent most of his youth in Hawaii. Not that poor boy brought up deprived, in a Getto life style that he & Wright want you to think with their lies ! Looking for sympathy votes & pandering for votes. Hyprocite! NObama !

Posted by: not fooled | May 3, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

What kind of people would be booing their own Governor at a dinner. didn;t they ever learn any manners. Oh yeah Obama is bound to win this state if this is the type of people that live there. You can’t pay the bills with fairy tales and thats what Obama keeps spinning. Talks of Change but never actually telling you How it will Change and how it will be paid for. Maybe his criminal associates in Chicago or his middle east terrorist cousins can find the money.

Posted by: jimbo | May 3, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Wow half the democrats won’t vote Hillary and half won’t vote for Obama. of the two who would get indepenents, progressives and a some republicans?

Posted by: kimber | May 3, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

They weren’t booing Clinton the were booing the NC governor, see the article say the governor are you now not going to believe you lying eyes? What is up with this?
and boos for the North Carolina governor,

Posted by: kimber | May 3, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

This is the most lively dialogue I have ever participated in on line. I am proud of you all for exerecising your first ammendment rights. The party is in a paradigm shift and it is the youth that will win this for the party. Our elders blind spots and prejudices prevent them from voting for an afro-american and saying they will vote for MCcain if obama is elected. Their beliefs are more inline with the republican party and we need to let them go. Hillary inflamed the race card when she started losing and we need to let her go also. We no longer want to live that way and they will only continue to be thorns in our plans for a democracy that serves the needs of the people. Health care, education, peace with our neighbors etc.

Posted by: deborah | May 3, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I don’t think there is much difference between Hillary and John McCain. If Hillary is elected as the democratic nominee them I will not vote for anyone. It will not make any difference.
Infact, if Ralph Nader stands for election I will vote for him instead.
I am sick and disgusted with Hillary’s method of spiteful attacks through out this election process.

Posted by: adam | May 3, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Hillary has got my vote…I believe she has the experience and the know how to get our economy back on track.I have always voted my pocketbook and Hillary has the best plan for getting us out of the recession we are in. Obama is not that bad…I just do not think he is ready. McCain is a no go in my opinion, he is hot headed and vindictive is his political approach…just what we don’t need.

Posted by: overseasCathy | May 3, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

This is the politics of intimidation. This must have been some of those Republican crossover voters. Democrats would never act in such a rude, uncompassionate manner. The Democratic party is known as the party of compassion. If Obama had true character, he would tell his supporters that he never wanted to hear such rudeness towards a fellow democrat. However, he has yet to show true class. If he had class and character, he would have tried to bring change to his severely dysfunctional church and pastor. He did his fellow AA’s no service by remaining silent in the face of destructive, hopeless talk that would not help the community rise,but just spiral downward. My guess is he just zoned off in church because he was only there for appearances to gain voters. Either that or he thinks racist hate speech is acceptable. He never denounced the pastor until he was after a bigger political prize.

Posted by: jkr | May 3, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

BTW, I’m tired of hearing how wonderful Obama is for not supporting a gas tax break when he supported them many times as an Illinois senator. He voted for them so many times that he said he felt like there should be signs on the pumps reminding the customers that the discounts were there because of Obama. Now that is pandering!

Posted by: jkr | May 3, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

What is wrong with Obama supporters?!?! The level of immaturity and rudeness is unbelievable.

Posted by: jb | May 3, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Perhaps she was booed because people are sick of her nasty tactics, and the fact that she continues to spoil the party’s chances of winning this November, and that she has divided the party by emulating Karl Rove, and throwing the kitchen and toilet sinks at Obama? I know dozens of Democrats who are turned off by her, and have decided not to vote for her ever again. Her thuggish behavior, and her blatant lies, certainly deserves loud boos. We do not need such a divisive candidate.

Posted by: Marsha | May 3, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Eight Belles was put out of her misery today after breaking her ankles. Who is Eight Belles? She is the filly in todays derby race Hillary put her bets on because she identified with eight belles. Well, I am wondering if she will continue to identify with Eight belles after today?

Posted by: JB | May 3, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Obama’s fanbase and their frequent outbursts reveal who the real thugs and dirty tricksters are in this race. Who’s tearing the party apart? Perhaps, the ones booing a democratic governor and other fellow democrats whenever they get the chance.

Posted by: jb | May 3, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Hillary supporters…get a grip. Obama will crush McCain. Have you seen him speak lately? Good lord, it’s almost like he’s ready to keel over any day. As a woman, I commend Hill’s toughness, but that doesn’t necessarily make a great leader. Obama has actually been an elected official longer than Hillary. Obama will put the best people around him and will make a terrific leader. Are you guys really happy with the way are gov’t is being influenced and run? I see Hillary as a republican at this point and will keep the same ole political bull going on in the whitehouse. She needs to answer to this fraud case first before she thinks about being a nominee. Her lies about Bosnia, the closing of the plant in Indiana, her failed healthcare, the whitewater case that was never resolved. In all those years, what has Hill ever really accomplished? What about the relationship they have with Rev. Wright. The only thing Hillary has going for her is her capacity to fool the most undereducated and uninformed people of this country into thinking she’s this perfect, honest princess. All the scandals, deceits and lies that you are aware of and you still want to vote for her? You guys are complete and utterly stupid hypocrites.

Posted by: mandm | May 3, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

bo smells like dukakis kerry gore and mcgovern…
are bo’s supporters swell ??? maybe they are on crack like obamas already admitted to smoking…
no crack smokers in the white house

Posted by: Harlan | May 3, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

I feel sorry for a lot of you. I have no debt, and work a modest job. I’ve seen the rational of the $140 example, but think about it. Is letting gas continue to sky rocket after the gax tax holiday really worth $140?
Plus the two gas tax cuts Obama voted for are permanent cuts, these are just a “few” days in the summer.
This country is on the verge of making a detrimental mistake I believe. Lord help those of you whose eyes are closed.
CLINTON versus PAUL <—–type in search bar.

Posted by: Louis | May 3, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Carlasue,
Wow! Your old man met the great Douglas MacArthur?! He is my favorite general of all-time. I am sure that must have been a real thrill.
Best wishes,
Albert

Posted by: Albert Cheng | May 4, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Isn’t if odd how you never hear about Clinton supporters booing or heckling Obama, but Obama supporters do it to Hillary ALL THE TIME. I’m telling you, you can judge a candidate by the company they keep — Reverand Wright, rude supporters. Doesn’t really make me want to vote for him if he’s the nominee.
And did Obama tell them to stop booing? Of course not. But if Hillary supporters had done the same, it would have been front page news the next day that Hillary didn’t “speak out against it.”
Oh, well, let the Dem leadership put Obama in there. Get ready for President McCain.

Posted by: Brian W. | May 4, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I took the time to read ALL the posts before I decided to write because I just wanted to see what everyone else thought or felt. I am shocked, saddened, angered, hurt feel betrayed and actually not surprised at all by some of the comments and posts I have read. America, while preaching togetherness and unity, peace and forgiveness, is doing so with their fingers crossed behind their backs. It seems that White is still not ready to accept Black yet. They will accept a White Woman before they accept a Black Man. Whoever posted that Black Men have achieved equality earlier is living in lala land for sure. Put down the drugs, please! Hillary did NOT chose to announce that she was running until Obama announced that HE was. I guess she was sure that White America wasn’t gonna have it. It appears that she was right (for some anyways).
There is no way on God’s green earth that Obama can do any worse than George W, let’s face it. America, please stop insulting each other, you don’t have to agree with each other’s candidate selection, but insults only show a lack of tolerance & respect for one another. And the rest of the WORLD is watching!!
Obama is running by himself. Every now and again his wife campaigns for him or with him. While Hillary needs Bill and Chelsey to compete. What does that say about her as a possible commander in chief? She needs 2 people to help her with one man? I could stoop to everyone elses level here but that’s beneath me.
oops.
Just how many government checks do the Clinton’s need? Bill’s getting checks as a former president, Hillary as a Senator. Bill’s getting Secret Service protection, now Hillary’s getting Secret Service protection. We’re paying for the housing for their Secret Service, which just happens to be the cost of their home that they bought in New York so Hillary could run because they KNOW she couldn’t run in Arkansas! Haven’t these two, this family fed from the public trouf long enough? How much longer do we have to feed them? When will they be full? Or is Chelsey next? Enough already!!! Get as REAL job like the rest of us!
I think it’s hilarious that they are calling Obama eliteist. What a joke. They believe if they call him that first no one will notice that THEY are? Get real!! How can you even use the words Eliteist and Black Man in the same sentence? We’re still swinging from trees you just can’t see the rope, can’t you tell from the postings on this website? How can you call yourself a Democrat and in the same breath say you will vote Republican rather than vote for a Black man? You were NEVER a Democrat to begin with…admit it!!! No self respecting Democrat would EVER threaten to vote Republican if they don’t get their way. They will begrudgingly vote for they other Democrat because ANY Democrat is better than ANY Republican. So you phony Democratic Republicans who have been posting in an attempt to get Democrats to fall for the okie doke, be gone, it won’t work. Just like family, we may argue, fuss and fight but in the end, we will come together and fight for our own you can bank on that !!!

Posted by: Truth'll Set You Free | May 4, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Real Deal <—–misinformed. I guess being a public servant for 20 years is disqualifying.
Experience….what has Hillary accomplished in her years as a Senator? Didn't she do the same thing as Obama as far as personal lives before any type of office? My bad…no she didn't. She practised law…He practised Constitutional Law. That being said, who knows more about your rights? Who will be more capable of fighting for you? Oh its that guy that fought for all those "have nots", back in Illinois.
Hillary vs Paul<——-plug it into your web browser

Posted by: Louis | May 4, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

All primaries should be held on the same day. The primaries held after McCain became the GOP nominee are meaningless since many Republicans are distorting the results by switching parties to vote in the primaries. Many conservative radio stations and websites are urging Republicans and Independents to vote for Senator Clinton because they think that she will be easier to beat than Obama, or simply to keep this ridiculous Democratic nomination fight going.
Obama has shown that he can raise money and organize much better than Hillary, so he will be much stronger against McCain than she is and McCain shouldn’t be that hard to beat. Remember the Keating Five? Obama is showing good judgment again by not pandering to this gas tax holiday.
I initially thought Hillary would be a good candidate, but then I looked into her past associations and decided I had been very wrong.
Google PeterPaulvClinton if your mind is open, or check out her role in the Watergate investigation. I don’t want someone as President who will say anything just to get elected. The Bosnia thing is glaring proof of her true character.
On the other hand, I don’t approve of booing anyone in public, that’s rude, but not as rude as trying to undermine a fellow Democrat with distortions and untrue inuendos. The patriotic thing would have been for Hillary to graciously withdraw at the appropriate time (long ago) instead of giving aid and comfort to the Republican party by dragging this on forever. If she were to do that, then I would have to rethink my lack of respect for her.

Posted by: connect the dots | May 4, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Brian. Constantly bringing up Wright IS playing the race card. Use some logic! Just because Bill had flings with women, doesn’t mean she did or that she should break off with him, does it? That’s also guilt by association, but it’s silly. Hillary herself brings it up every chance she gets. Nobody needs any conspiracy theories to see that.
Every primary since before Texas was tainted by Republicans voting in the Democratic primaries voting for who they think will be easiest to beat or for Hillary because they want the Democrats to keep fighting. The primary vote counts are now meaningless.

Posted by: connect the dots | May 4, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

It must be shocking when people discover you are not believable. A lot like Charles Gibson. I know we need unite and begin the healing process but does Obama really want her speaking on his behalf?

Posted by: Bh In Phoenix | May 4, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Brian has issues and hasn’t come to grips with his disdain for Black people even after 43 years. Careful, your loathing srlf-hatred might get the best of you after May 6.

Posted by: Bh In Phoenix | May 4, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Hey, you folks stating that Clinton was speaking in front of Obama supporters have it all wrong! This was not an Obama rally; this was “the North Carolina Democratic Party’s Jefferson-Jackson dinner in Raleigh, N.C., Friday evening — where both she and Obama spoke.” Supporters for both candidates were there!! I would guess the attendees could cheer the candidate of their choice, be it Hilliary or Senator Obama. If Hilliary didn’t get cheered, perhaps few of her supporters were there. As far as Easley being booed, I understand he is not a popular govenor and is on his way out anyway. If the people in North Carolina are unhappy with him, they have a right to let him know. This is “SUPPOSED” to be a free country; have you ever heard of “FREEDOM OF SPEECH”? If applause is fair game at these dinners, then I would think the boos are fair game as well?? I wouldn’t call the people’s reactions “rude”, I’d call them “impassioned”. :):)

Posted by: NinaK | May 4, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

It is amazing that the demographics of white voters that are opposed to Obama are those that are relatively uneducated. This tells you that there inclinations are primarily primordial and emotional rather than fact based abd objective. Are non-college educated people the ones to decide on what is best for the American people. God help us all!!!!!!!!

Posted by: J. Ike Egbuna | May 4, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

There was nothing wrong with what happened to Hillary. In anthropology, it’s called “mirroring.” However, I think the “technical” term for it is called Kharma. As you sow so shall you reap.

Posted by: G.D.H. | May 4, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Hillary has got my vote…I believe she has the experience and the know how to get our economy back on track.I have always voted my pocketbook and Hillary has the best plan for getting us out of the recession we are in. Obama is not that bad…I just do not think he is ready. McCain is a no go in my opinion, he is hot headed and vindictive is his political approach…just what we don’t need.
Posted by: overseasCathy
——————–
Cathy, you say,
“Hillary has got my vote…I believe she has the experience and the know how to get our economy back on track.I have always voted my pocketbook and Hillary has the best plan for getting us out of the recession we are in.”
Sorry to bust your bubble. Hillary has proven she is not capable for leading, managing or running anything! She has run a shoddy and chaotic campaign (infighting, 3 big shakeups, race cards, gendercards, etc. etc.). She has also proven she is incapable of managing her donors’ contributions and donations. She owes middle-class business people approximately $8 Million, dating back to the Iowa Caucuses!!! She owes Penn’s company $10 Million, and owes Penn approx 6 Million. And you think she can do better with our country?? With her financial know-how, we would be totally dependent on China and Saudi Arabia!! And our country would be in total ruins!!

Posted by: NinaK | May 4, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

Sounds as though Hillary is as much of a Democrat as Lieberman is.
She’s fallen a long way with her campaign.

Posted by: Lreyla | May 4, 2008, 5:03 am 5:03 am

real deal, don’t you mean we don’t need another idiot like the ones that voted for the Iraq war?

Posted by: Lreyla | May 4, 2008, 5:11 am 5:11 am

reading some of these comments makes me wonder whether people onthis blog are well informed, or do they simplu rely on MSM.
As an independent i judge the candiates based on how they run their campaigns. I also ask myself, why would close friends abandoin ship…what do they know? Why are close Hilary surragates jumping ship for Obama….???????
Mcain seems to win on the trust issue. Hilary fails in the integrity department. Both Hilary and Obama have similar policies…..the diffenrece at thge end of the day. is whom can we trust????
Hilary even without her buggage in the past cannot be trusted……read more about her, what bills has she passed as a senator? Please Hilary supporters, tell me more about Hilary experience,you judge a man/woman by her past….
what are Hilarys succes in the past…lets talk issues here…35 yrs expeirnece..please words do matter not empty speech….list that experience please…..

Posted by: nmt | May 4, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

could someone please expalin to me why I as an independent should vote for hilaRY????
I see thsi is clearly hilary world here….but then again, the ebate by ABC was a hilary debate too…..please hilary world, tell, list 35 reasons…for the 35 years of experience, and i mean reasons with substance…..why i should vote for Hilary????

Posted by: nmt | May 4, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am

Whoever is democratic nominee would not matter. If Obama is the nominee democrat this vote goes to McCain along with other friends who see Obama as abomination.

Posted by: ds1938 | May 4, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

The problem with a number of posts here is that folks are calling out sides — which stands to only perpetuate divisiveness.
“these supporters always do X and Y.” People group the actions of a small faction and promote them as actions of all folks behind the particular candidate. I support one candidate in this primary, but categorizing and labeling with generalization is wrong.
Folks, its hate speech – plain and simple. Its easy to see how passions can blind us, but keeping the larger integrity intact is something we should all (and always) consider.

Posted by: Robs | May 4, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Do Hillary supporters ever check their facts? The Clintons have a very dark and deary -heavily documented past-the likes of which make them unfit to run anything. RESEARCH, LEARN…their antics provide fresh material daily, but dig up the old stuff that they still have to account for…and distract you – so you won’t find them out.

Posted by: cecibertrand | May 4, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

DCVoter,
Thanks a lot for your comments.
Excellent.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 4, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

denhunter, Oh Please, the whining has to stop. If you call that suffering OMG, you must find this administration quite pleasing. Florida has no jobs, the fuel prices are astronomical and you worry about your fellow democrat. Oh Please stop the whining. According to HRC this campaign is a “GAME CHANGER”. As if this is a game when you are dealing with the lives of American people.

Posted by: Martha, Georgia | May 4, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Well, listening to media has gotten us where we are now. Who do you think the media wants you to vote for, Hillary, of course. If you haven’t realized it yet, the Democratic primary is over, Obama is the Democratic canidate, and the media, wants you to believe she has a fighting chance. Think! Use that god given brain of yours, don’t support what they want. Because if you want what they want, you are going to be poorer, war will continue, and the Clinton influence peddling window will be open, once again, selling your future to the corporations one bill at a time, one free trade agreement every six months.

Posted by: ETO | May 4, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Obama supporters should be ashamed of themselves, but their types never are – they are clueless.
You are looking at what it is going to be like if he is the President.
He himself flipped Mrs. Clinto the finger – he can lie all he wants – he did it.
BARACK OBAMA IS TRASH!!!!!!!!
Obama volunteers, supporters, staffers are nasty.
I WILL BE VOTING FOR MCCAIN IF THAT FILTH GETS THE NOMINATION!

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 4, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

I am just tired of reading posts that ask why Barack Obama stayed at Trinity for nearly 20 years. Could he have remained at Trinity for the same reason Hillary remains with Bill? Could it just be that there is something to be gained by staying? It’s so one sided that Hillary and the media can ask over and over again why Obama stayed at Trinity. Yet, Obama and the media do not ask why Hillary stays with Bill. Another double standard.

Posted by: amoment | May 4, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

To you, Ted, and others calling Obama supporters trash, please curb your name calling. How would you feel if I called all hillary supporters liars because they support a liar. Let’s try to stick with the issues without resorting to name calling.

Posted by: amoment | May 4, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

People, settle down. This is an election that will decide what America will look like in 5, 10, 25 years. Shouldn’t the tenor of your post be about the issues faces our nation and not not the personal minutia that the cable news channels and broadcast media tell us are important?

Posted by: Art4jazz | May 5, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Obama or Hillary. Vote for your choice and stop attacking the one you don’t choose, because the democratic nominee will need your support in the general election. If you want the Republican party to win, then just continue the attacks. Enough already, be objective. You can compare your candidate’s attributes without tearing the other one down!

Posted by: Margie | May 5, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

FYI–Obama is not supported by the far left. Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney are supported by the far left. As Ron Paul is supported by the principled Libertarians.
The far left and the libertarian right both agree that the wars in Iraq is illegal and is dragging the country down, and should be ended immediately. Obama won’t do that.
Also, most observers on the far left recognize that US history is one of genocide of the Indians, slavery and Jim Crow of blacks, and numerous wars (Mexican, Spanish American, WWI, WWII, Vietnam) all used contrived provocations
(FDR knew the Japanese were attacking Pearl Harbor), not to mention Gulf of Tonkin (Vietnam), non existent babies in incubators (Gulf War I) and phony WMD story (Gulf War II) not to mention 911.
By distancing himself from Wright, he is allowing the public to continue to wallow in multigenerational denial, in the interests of “unity”. So the repression of historical truth continues and the country continues to dig itself deeper into moral and economic debt.

Posted by: Subhuti | May 5, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

overseasCathy said:
Hillary has got my vote…I believe she has the experience and the know how to get our economy back on track.I have always voted my pocketbook and Hillary has the best plan for getting us out of the recession we are in.
Cathy what experience and know how does
Hillary Clinton have to get our economy
back on track? Please explain!
What is her plan for getting us out of the recession?
Does her statement that she won’t
listen to economist’s opinions about
the economy impress you?

Posted by: reaganfan | May 5, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

It was one of Hilary’s best speech. Intelligent, cool,decent, respectful of Obama, omprehenisive, straight from the heart and very presidential in all angles. She very professional. If they did, it just shows the extent of desperation they have, which also shows in every caucus. Dirty, intimidating and grandiose. We are a misogynist society, Barack is a man, he already has a point being a man. He was on an attacking mode during the speech. Even Fox News immediately applauded him, and not a word on Hilary after the speech. silence about her.. The voters will speak and Hilary will come up to the challenge.

Posted by: Mindaluz, Honolulu | May 5, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Hillary Clinton is getting booed because she is employing dirty, divisive, underhanded Karl Rove style attacks with a scorched earth attitude that if she can’t have the nomination she’ll take the whole party down with her. The Clintons have completely destroyed whatever good will they had with half of the Democratic party. Hillary Clinton is nothing but a DLC Republican wannabe just like Joe Lieberman. I started out neutral in this thing, thinking we had a choice between 2 good candidates, and Hillary Clinton has made me despise her in a few short months with her willingness to destroy the party and destroy Obama. He hasn’t unleashed anywhere near the negativity on her that she has on him – it’s left to his supporters to give voice to the genuine disgust towards her that we feel. That being said, if she gets the nomination, I’ll have to hold my nose and vote for her, because the worst Democrat is still better than the best Republican.

Posted by: Kimberley | May 5, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.