Clinton: ‘This is Nowhere Near Over’
ABC News’ Eloise Harper Reports: Senator Hillary Clinton, in advance of the possibility that the Obama campaign will declare victory on Tuesday based on an advantage in pledged delegates, told a crowd Monday morning that a Democratic nominee will not be determined by tomorrow.
"This is nowhere near over. None of us is going to have the number of delegates we’re going to need to get to the nomination. Although I understand – my opponents and his supporters are going to claim that – and the fact is we have to include Michigan and Florida." Clinton continued, "We cannot claim we have a nominee based on 48 states, particularly two states that are so important for us to win in the fall. So part of our challenge is making sure that we nominate the person most able to win. And I believe that I’m the stronger candidate."
Clinton said later in her speech, "I’m gonna make my case and I’m gonna make it until we have a nominee – but were not going to have one today and we’re not going to have one tomorrow and we’re not going to have one the next day. And if Kentucky turns out tomorrow, I will be closer to that nomination."
Clinton also added, as she first mentioned Sunday night at a fundraiser in Kentucky, that she has endured this long campaign so that a Democrat could win the presidency. Careful not to say Obama could not win the general election, Clinton implied, as she has in the past, that he is a riskier choice saying, "anybody who is really analyzing this and saying ‘OK we did not go through this long campaign to lose in the fall.’ We can not afford to have four more years of a Republican president."
Speaking at a high school in Maysville, KY, Clinton supported that argument saying, "the states that I have won total 300 electoral votes. If we had the same rules as the Republicans, I would be the nominee right now. We have different rules so what we’ve got to figure out is who can win 270 electoral votes. My opponent has won states totaling 217 electoral votes. Now we both have some states that are going to be hard for us to win in the fall like Texas and Oklahoma. But I still have a cushion if you look at all the states that I’ve won and take out those that may not be in our column come the fall. My opponent has 217 electoral votes including places like Alaska and Idaho and Utah and Kansas and Nebraska. And many of his votes and his delegates come from caucus states which have a relatively low turnout."
Clinton asked for a big turnout tomorrow saying, "if Kentucky votes big tomorrow we are gonna to keep going, and were gonna keep fighting and we are going to keep making our case because you cant win the presidency without winning Kentucky."
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Clinton speaks the truth. Obama cannot win Alaska, Idaho, Utah, Kansas, Nebraska and other states.
Posted by: geevill | May 19, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Isnt this what she told West Virginia. It’s over Hillary time to move on.
Posted by: LOVY | May 19, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Every piece of mail from the DNC is returned by me with a note saying go to shell! I am now an independent.
Every donation they ask for I refer them to OBAMA, where has all their money gone, to him.
I do not support him, I will not fund any Dem except Hillary.
The DNC has lost many members and we will never, ever vote for OBAMA, NEVER!
Posted by: HP Boston | May 19, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Hillary will win big in Kentucky and be competitive in Oregon. Again, Oregon is prime Dem territory, while Kentucky is a pivotal swing state that Dems need to take. Hillary is running strong in electoral vote and popular vote. Dems should carefully weigh all this data.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 19, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
HP … I support Hillary too not only because I think she will be a better president… but everybody (especially the press) is shoving this flawed candidate down our throats and I believe its a big mistake… not only for our country but for our party . … As a lifelong democrat I will never vote for him
Posted by: Nick | May 19, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Hillary Who???
Posted by: Stephen | May 19, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Awesome, Nick!!!!
Great argument! It’s the “press” that caused all those people to vote for Obama. It’s the “press” that make Hillary run the worst run campaign since Napoleon invaded Russia. It’s the fault of the “press” that Obama ran a clean campaign and has an insurmountable delegate lead.
Ohhhh, just OUTSTANDING stuff. You guys running out of straws to grasp at yet? Reality seeping into those Clinton Kool Aid addled minds yet?
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Time for Hillary to stop throwing stones. She can still have a good career in the senate as long as she doesn’t shoot herself in the foot or talk about sniper-fire again. Obama 2008!
Posted by: pt | May 19, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
$4-5 dollar gas and come November the heating oil bills start to ramp up. The public is mad and getting madder and you can bet come November they’re going to take it out on the party in power – at least perceived power – and that’s the Republican White House. The Republicans are finished except for the tire tracks on John McCain’s back when the dust settles.
In one of the early debates Hillary made the point about wanting to be in charge of a great beauracracy – I actually thought it was one of the more truthful moments she’s served up. I predict Obama will grant her wish and make her Secretary of something like Health and Human Services where she can lord it over “Her Own Private Venezuela”. I think she’ll be happy…
Posted by: Frank | May 19, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
(still laughing)
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
NCdem…. I’m a Philly dem and somethings are more important than patisan politics we vote for a person not an Ideology or perty Obam is green, and a socailist both are bad for a working person with 4 kids … win or lose he’ll never get my vote
Posted by: Nick | May 19, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
quitters are losers and losers are quitters! Statistics show that most men will quit before a woman. Women are more likely to stay loyal and continue to fight…it’s in our genes…more men will give in and quit.
She’s not a quitter-that’s the point!
Posted by: lara | May 19, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Oh The Obama stepdord children are at it again …. take an opposing point of view and you are called names….Are there any mature Obama voters that understand that dsicourse is the way our syatem works… or just a bunch of wet behind the ears children
Posted by: Nick | May 19, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
I’m not clear on why Hillary thinks New York or California voters would vote like West Virginia voters did in the GE if Barack is the candidate.
It seems more like it’s a politician carefully cherry picking the information and presenting partial information in a light which casts her candidacy as superior.
I’m tired of having my intelligence insulted, I wish this was all over. It’s been brought home to me that the democratic party voter tent includes some people I’m tired of accepting.
To the older WV voter who said she would never vote for a black man and the older women’s rights voters who attack female Obama supporters as misogynists and traitors – we need to move on from these fear/emotion driven ideas and do what is best for the nation.
Posted by: CitizenVoter | May 19, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
hey Texas voter… no the press can’t get everybody… just enough to put him over the top… and I never said that Hillary ran a great campaign… Obama may very well win the nomination but he definatley is not the best candidate to win in November… if you look at history at -least the last 40 years … democrats like to elect duds… but in the general everybody votes..
Posted by: Nick | May 19, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
BHO will lose in November at a time that no other dems could even possibly lose. He is a phony hypocrite, now that he is cry baby that the GOP cannot criticize his wife. Then, hide the mouth piece behind closed doors if you do not want to expose your true colors.
BHO has framed everything that is remotely linked to the HRC campaign as racist. Now he is crying fault of the GOP for criticizing her wife, who goes around and talks about nonsense (actually their true beliefs).
Posted by: boneheaded, chicago | May 19, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
In reality, Obama is definitely the more honest and credible candidate.
That would be truth, to say the least.
Posted by: NCDem | May 19, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Sometimes ignorance of the true facts gets the best of me.
Instead of voting based on my critical thinking skills, I usually vote based on perception.
Voters like myself and others are the true causes of the current leadership of our country.
WE JUST DON’T CRITICALLY THINK THINGS OUT!
Posted by: NCDem | May 19, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
NCDem, you need to face reality. In a week or so Hillary will ask all her supporters to back Obama for the good of the country. We can not have a bush-3 term from mc-more-war. Obama is the best person to lead this nation forward. Noone thought he had a chance in the beginning. He has funded his campaign thru ordinary citizens which I think is Fantastic. People realize that he is sincere, hinest, and hard-working. He will bring about real change and will destroy mc-more-war in the fall. Obama 2008!
Posted by: pt | May 19, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Arggggggggggggggggggggggghhh!!!!
Why is this happening to me!!!!
Posted by: NCDem | May 19, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Nat Turner What is your trip? You supposedly are supporting a candidate who’s about hope, unity and change and yet you write that offensive and classist junk? You’re a hypocrite and I have no idea why you would possibly vote for someone who’s message is so removed from yourself. Obama needs to clean his own house before he gets to the White House.
Posted by: alpaig | May 19, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
John,
I suspected as much. There is BIG dirt to come out on Obama and that’s why Hillary is sticking around. It’s just the timing that not sure. It probably won’t come out until after the convention when the DNC will look like idiots for nominating this LOSER. But I guess they’re just really good at picking LOSERS – Kerry, Gore, Dukakis, McGovern, Carter, Mondale, …OOOH the list goes on. Seems to me the only winner they had in YEARS was a CLINTON.
GO HILLARY!!
Posted by: Get Real | May 19, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
hey Texas Voter… Bill Clinton was the bright spot there… you seem to ignore the other duds… Hey i lived through those losses and as a democrat I know why they lost …. something democrats like you still haven’t figured out ….the real world
Posted by: Nick | May 19, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
I know deep down inside that Obama will be the next President of the United States.
I just can’t fathom the idea of having a breath of fresh air in politics after being in the dungeon of mental apathy.
I promise to get better.
Posted by: NCDem | May 19, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I truly apologize for my ignorant posts about Obama and the next POTUS.
I understand that there is a wave of hope that rhetoric and whining will and cannot stop.
YES I CAN TOO!
Posted by: NCDem | May 19, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
The larger crowds BHO draws, the greater loss he will maintain.
Posted by: fat cat | May 19, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Texas voter… I’m trying to figure out what you are arguing… if you read my post I never contend Hillary will win… in fact I suggest just the opposite… I just think that Obama is a weaker candidate in November… as democrats we have a habit of doing that
Posted by: Nick | May 19, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Texas Voter,
How come you didn’t mention the latest Gallup Poll that has show Clinton CONSISTENTLY ahead of McCain (albeit by just 3 to 5 points)for over a week, while little Obama has been lagging behind and is struggling to even keep even? He CAN’T and WON’T win the GE!!!
Posted by: Get Real | May 19, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
NCdem…how do you figure OB has stolen anything? He camein as the underdog and HRC has just as much opportunity to win those states as Obama…My God…please…would you Hillary get with the program.It’s over…
Posted by: truthtell | May 19, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
NCDEM IS A REPUBLICAN
We’ll see who’s dilusional come August. For obvious reasons her campaign can’t be the one to leak it.
Posted by: Get Real | May 19, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Obama rigged the election? Are you mad Clinton supporters. Go see a doctor.
Posted by: Jason | May 19, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
but it is done blanche… it is.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Nick,
You sound like one of those limbaugh-listeners that was hoping Hillary would win the nod because the GOP thinks they have a chance against her. They are scared to death to go against Obama. He had a crowd of 80,000 at a rally in Oregon the other day.. Can you imagine mc-more-war trying to get that kind of enthusiasm? Look for a landslide against mc-more-war in the fall. Obama 2008!!
Posted by: pt | May 19, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Talk about petty….yezzzz…you HRC supoporter need to get with the program. No matter who wins we need to defat McCain!!!! My God….You are all just as vindictive and egotisical as HRC…If Hillary get s the nod, which I doubt, I will take a deep breath and vote HRC….NEVER MCCAIN….
Posted by: truthtell | May 19, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
AWAKE…please go back to your GOP site and leave us alone. You are fooling no one. Typing in CPAS doens’t make your point any better.
No Democrat would vote for McCain over Obama. To suggest so is absurd and ignorant of the turht that HRC and BHO have basically the same policies.
Posted by: Jason | May 19, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
My nominee is Barack Obama.
Clinton and all the ‘single cause’ haters can play all they want – we march on.
Posted by: PulSamsara | May 19, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Obama is only bad to the GOP operative and bitter sore loser Clinton supporters.
If you had anything bad to say, in truthm, you would say it. All that we see is here is more of the same rhetoric bigotry.
You have nothing ot offer but your opinion, and judging by the opinion of the rest of the great nation, they love and trust Obama more than McCain or Hillary.
I’m sorry that you are bitter because you old school politics don;t work anymore. Too bad for you.
Posted by: Jason | May 19, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
State by state means nothing. total votes, total delegates, mena EVERYTHING.
Stop trying to change the rules AGAIN…Hillary…again? please…not again? You can’t keep changing the rules, this isn’t the Republicna party, we play by Dem rules….the same rules that you had NO PROBLEM following when your husband was elected.
Posted by: Jason | May 19, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
AWAKE….My God, wake up!!! If the case was in reverse Hillary would be LOVING the caucases…Yezzz…She has been a part of this process for 30 years. Her problem was underestimating the caucases. She should have studied them and been ready to participate…HRC you loose…
Posted by: truthtell | May 19, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Hey Texas Voter…if you are suggesting the Sd will or should overturn the popular vote and the delgate count, I have a gridge for sale you should buy some of. $100 a brick.
Posted by: Jason | May 19, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Lots of people on this post sound patriotic…if you really are…how can you think about putting the Clintons back in the White House?
They made a mockery of the Presdency.
Hillary is making a mockery of the Domocratic National Party by saying that ‘they can’t count’! Hillary is going her own way and will take the whole thing to court if she has to!!
Maybe it will be in the same LA court where Judge Munoz will start hearing testimony in the Clintons camapaign fraud trial due to start soon!!!!
Posted by: twotraps | May 19, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Yavo – the popular count typically does not include caucus states. Of course, since Hillary wants every vote to be represented, she would want the causus states voters to be included. Even though they favor Obama, Hillary could possibly want to disenfranchise caucus voters? Could she?
Posted by: X marks the spot | May 19, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
BHO has stolen (or more precisely, is stealing) the nomination because he has free advertising 24 hrs continuously on every day in all cable networks (perhaps, except fox – what the hell do we know, fair and balanced) by talking heads who are immediately tingled between their legs when they hear BHO speaks.
This is how unfair these dems primaries have been.
Wait until the Rep scrutinize him, and he will be exposed just as he does not want they expose his wife while she exposes herself every time she opens her mouth.
Posted by: fat cat | May 19, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
marty…I find that you have an empty head…if you vote McCain…What will you tell our future generation( your children and grandchildren) when they asked how we got in this mess….when they are still fighting in Iraq?
Posted by: truthtell | May 19, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
COME on Kentucky….make your voices heard! I did hear that Obama decided not to declare to avoid that elitist and arrogant look. Too late that America already heard the plans and think that anyway. NEITHER candidate can make the magic number (with or without FL/MI). Those superdelegates who are being sweet talked are the ones deciding our nominee….they SHOULD consider the BIG states AND the swing states. Voters will ONLY be happy with a DREAM ticket.
Posted by: Darla | May 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Obama is ridiculously inexperienced, dishonest, arrogant, hypocrite. If DNC is insane enough to nominate Obama, we’re looking at a McCain landslide. That’s not revenge, but a sane thing to do. Vote McCain anytime.
By the way, what happened to the will of the people, not overturning the popular vote, etc. Does it apply only when it suits Obama? Hillary won WV by landslide, and sen Byrd is endorsing Obama? Is he thinking he could wash away his racist past beofre dying by doing this? Obomination is all about symbolism, and this proves it again.
First Choice Hillary. Second choice McCain. OBAMA NEVER. We have the numbers, electoral college strength to prevail in November.
Posted by: Long-term Democrat | May 19, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
INFORM…I have never seen so many petty people as the HRC supporter. When HRC won West Virginia they were all over the blogs saying it was OVER, she won, but what they didn’t realize was that there were not many delegates there. Plus now that she is presumed to not win many of the rest you are all getting NASTY and suggesting Obama has stolen it…GET REAL…
Posted by: truthtell | May 19, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Obama supporters, I hate to break it to you but a simple majority of pledged delegates does not secure the nomination.
And for those of you who say Clinton has run a lousy campaign, what does it say about your guy that he can’t put away a lousy campaigner when he’s so much better at it in your opinion?
Posted by: josgirl | May 19, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
“What will you tell our future generation( your children and grandchildren) when they asked how we got in this mess….when they are still fighting in Iraq?”
Yes if McCain is elected for 4 years he will ensure that we stay in Iraq for the next 100 years. He’s working on the paperwork as we speak.
Posted by: Mack | May 19, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Hang in there Hillary!!! We may be quieter than the 75,000 Obama campaign workers at the Portland rally, but we are just as strong. Our strength is shown during discussions on the soccer field, at the grocery store or even in church. We understand what has happened and how the good old boy network has tried to manipulate this election,but your determination and the refusal to quietly go away has earned you the respect and votes of many. We will make our opinion heard loud and clear in November.
Posted by: reality 80 | May 19, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
long term…dishonest, arrogant, hypocrite. Sounds like Hillary…
Posted by: truthtell | May 19, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
what Hillary and her supporters have yet to realize is that Obama has redefined the elctoral map and will win the presidency.
========================================
You mean in November Obama is going to have landslide victories in Idaho, Wyoming, and Monatana. LOL! Obamabots are completely delusional. All McCain has to do is to put a conservative like Huckabee on the ticket. Obama wouldn’t take a single red state. Florida is going McCain, Obama is very weak in OH, and PA against McCain. Sure Loser= Obama.
Posted by: Long-term Democrat | May 19, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
“This is nowhere near over.”
Yeah, it is. Not only is it over, it’s been over since Ohio/Texas. And Clinton knows it, and she’s known it since Ohio/Texas. She’s been running for 2012 ever since those results came in, and she’s still running for an opening in 2012, which means she’ll keep the internecine fight going until at least the Denver convention. “Let the healing not begin.”
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 19, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Just because Democrats in some states think she is the better candidate does not mean they think Barack is a bad candidate.
I highly doubt states like New York, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and California, who voted for Clinton in the primaries, will go Republican in the fall.
Besides, isn’t Barack attracting Republicans and Independents? I haven’t seen Hillary doing that lately.
The reason why this has gone on so long is because they both are excellent candidates and, for the first time in a long time, America is confused by their ability and not their incompentency.
Posted by: Nick | May 19, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Reality 08…are you suggesting because Obama is a man he has had a free ride? If so you are VERY wrong. Just like a woman, the black man and woman have had to work twice as hard to get where they are. And are still fighting prejudgeous.
Posted by: Bman | May 19, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Obama was suppose to make his victory speech tomorrow in Iowa. I now hear otherwise. Why is he canceling the victory speech?
Posted by: evie | May 19, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Yavo Lem
someone needs to inform you that primaries don’t matter unless the margins are ginormous…
your posting is that of someone who doesn’t understand math saying 2+2=4 so the earth is round.
Obama has the margins in states that matter…that we can overtake…so go look at your map again…with the numbers as they stand it is not a question of who will win for dems…but who will bring in more states for the future.
that is overwhelmingly Obama.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
I think it is pretty well agreed that Obama needs the Clinton supporters in order to win the general election.
Why are Obama supporters treating Clinton supporters so rudely? You are certainly not helping him by trashing Hillary and her supporters.
I would vote for Hillary, but am not sure if I would vote for Obama. I still do not hear much more than rhetoric from him, very little in the way of plans but lots of “change” rhetoric. What is he going to change, how is he going to change them, how will he work inside the system that he want’s to change? So far I am not convinced and your slams at Clinton are not helping.
There are many of us that doubt Obama’s chance of being elected in Nov.
The Republican attack machine is licking its chops folks so don’t turn off too many of us Clinton supporters or we may be saying…”told you so”
Posted by: TOM E | May 19, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Hillary is right!!! Obama is a weaker candidate. What really screws up Hillary is the stupid democratic delegate system!!! The undemocratic caucuses should be canceled because not everyone can participate and such contests don’t exist in the general election! So, a nominee who’s chosen largely by victories in those caucuses states cannot necessarily win!!! Please use popular votes rather than delegates to judge a candidate!
Hillary’s a way stronger candidate than Obama. Obama supporters, please be aware that it was a game played by the republicans to elect Obama so that they can crush Obama in the fall and win the white house.
Posted by: Cindy | May 19, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Yavo Lem,
This is a serious question. You keep including MI and FL in your math, what is HRC going to do when the DCCC denies her plea to seat the delegates as voted? The DCCC has hinted, strongly, that they would not be buying this agrument. If she is depending on MI and FL to claim the nomination and is denied, then what?
Thank you in advance for replying.
Posted by: Really? | May 19, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
This is all crazy, people have gone mad over this and it is pretty pathetic. We are fighting amongst ourselves like a bunch children. Clinton is running this campaign like she is running in November with no regards to the damage she is causing to the paty. Just looking at all the comments and the immaturity of all thi bickering obama this clinton that, what the hell, this is sickening. Clinton is more than welcome to run for as long as she wants, hell even when she loses she can run in November for all i care. But there is no realistic way for her to win the nomination. Im sorry to burst anyones bubble but lets be real hear, theres no shame in bowing out but Clinton supportes are really make it hard for themselves because they are the ones that are going to be feeling pretty stupid for all the negativity they are showing and claiming we will see when she wins. There is no way period. How many states has she won? Come on do you people really thing the convetion is going to go against the popular vote, he has wone more states, more delegates, popular vote, super delegates. Sorry to burst anyones bubble but hope canonly get you so far, then reality kicks in, Obama is going to be the nominee, and it is nuts for clinton supporters to try and bully obama in having her or one of her supporters for vp, Grow up!
Posted by: al | May 19, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Lem I like seeing the numbers to bad they hate seeing them Hillary is still very much in this race and still may win it no matter what the media lies are.
Posted by: Bishop | May 19, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
I was part of the more than 75,000 people who came to support Senator Obama on the banks of the Willamette River in Portland, Oregon yesterday. I can tell you that I have never been in a crowd where solidarity, friendship, and unity of vision has so obviously been evident among people from every walk of life. It was simply astounding and wonderful.
All the haters and dividers who try to trash this good and decent man are falling into the same old trap that corporate interests have used to divide and conquer the American people for the last eight years.
Senator Obama will crush the Republican attack machine this fall, because he is right on all the issues. They might attack him as a human being, but we will not be fooled this time.
John McCain promises to stack the Supreme Court with anti Roe versus Wade neanderthals, to continue a failed intervention in a civil war in Iraq, to ignore 47 million people who have no health insurance, and to continue Bush economics.
This is no contest, folks. Wake up before it’s too late.
Time for a change that we can believe in.
Posted by: Luke Gilmore | May 19, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
I don’t get all the hateful posts. For the Hillary folks, did you see the crowd that showed up in Oregon to hear Obama, no way to spin that kind of support. Hillary couldn’t draw that many to a rally if she was passing out $5.00 bills. On the other hand to Obama folks, Hillary does draw support from the old Rust belt states and Obama will be in a real fight to win those in November. If the sides keep fighting McCain will be the next president and that would be a real shame.
Posted by: Ransompw | May 19, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
IF Hillary loses this nom, then most of her supporters will vote McCain. Most of them will also leave the Democrat Party. When you Obama Supporters say that Obama will win over McCain, I hope you put this fact into your equation. You really shouldn’t count your chickens before they hatch. lol.
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
(It ain’t over until the lady in the pantsuit says so!)
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 19, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Who is paying these super d’s to line up behind BO? Just saw one from WVA where Hillary won in a landslide go to BO again? What is going on here and who is manipulating this?
Posted by: Debra | May 19, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
al last time I checked no one asked you.She is not doing damage she has every right to stay in this until it is over and super del are not included in the count yet so he does nt have evough at the end of this primary he will not have enough.
Posted by: Bishop | May 19, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
It’s OVER… Now could you PLEASE focus on beating John McCain!!!
Posted by: blog | May 19, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Thank you, Yavo Lem – I read and appreciate all of your posts.
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
(It ain’t over until the lady in the pantsuit says so!)
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 19, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
No one likes a sore loser and Hillary Clinton is increasing looking like one with each passing day. Senator Obama and the DNC have gone out their way to be nice to Senator Clinton – to give her space – but the time is fast approaching when she will be forced to withdraw for the good of the Party.
Posted by: Elon | May 19, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
The democratic party is already fractured beyond repair. You have those that are to the far left and those that are more towards the center. The voters towards the center have flatly rejected Obama.
Posted by: Mack | May 19, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Hillary, the race was over a long time ago. Face it, Obama won and he will be next president. It’s truly unbeliavable how she keeps going with the purpose of spliting the party when the one thing we need is to come together as one and beat the republicans. STEP ASIDE WOMAN! i wish someone could make her understand that it is done. This hypocrital candidate has shown no ethics throughout the campaign that is the one of the main reason she lost.
Posted by: carla | May 19, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
@OBAMA SUPPORTER – Sorry, but you are very much mistaken. This process has disenfranchised 1/2 of this party. Most of us are leaving it since it no longer represents our values and there is no way we can vote Obama. The anger at the DNC is real and it is not felt by just a few people. You can take it to the bank.
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
(It ain’t over until the lady in the pantsuit says so!)
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Hillary supporters. You say Obama needs you to win but you seem to forget that Hillary would need Obama supporters to win. This is a Mexican standoff (old western slang for when two people have their guns aimed at each other. Both sides want the other side to put the gun down first). If you are voting on issues, Obama and Hillary are very close. It doesn’t matter which one gets the nomination, either of them are closer than McCain is. If you are voting emotionally, then by definition rational arguments will not affect your opinion (and therefore your vote).
Posted by: X marks the spot | May 19, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
No Democrat has won the White House without winning West Virginia since 1916; an astounding 35% of Clinton supporters in that state say they will vote for McCain.
Presidential elections come down to contests in a small number of swing states (PA, OH, FL). Which states can Obama win that Kerry lost? Apparently not Ohio or Florida, Clinton can win those two states.
Posted by: Phillip | May 19, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Hey Texas Voter… your blinded by your support for Obama and defensive about anyone that challenges his candidacy
Your Words…”OK, I didn’t get that since you said the Press was the only reason Obama was ahead. Since that was the basis for your entire argument, you understand my confusion.”
Check the facts… I never said that the press was the ONLY reason Obama was ahead… I said they influence enough morons and have their own support Obama agenda that will give him enough votes in a very close democrat race… I hope that that is clear enough so that all you “educated” Obama supporters can clearly understand… tired of my words being interpreted to fit your agenda
Posted by: Nick | May 19, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Clinton’s descriptive and view of the primary process is spot on. Obama and his supporters should have no problem with waiting for this to run its course if they are so confident in his nomination. Allowing all states to be heard shows the Democrats believe in hearing the will of the people. What is coming to the forefront though is that Obama would not be where he is except for the caucus. His delegate lead would be less than ten, hardly a mandate for his nomination. . For the first time every state matters and Obama wants to silence their voices. Good for Clinton for staying in and giving them the opportunity to help decide what is best for this country.
Posted by: anotherview | May 19, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
75,000 crowd in Oregon is the reason Obama should become president? One could make the exact opposite argument.
The country is facing serious problems; MEANWHILE Obamamania shows are like rock concerts. Very shallow, emotionalism, and symbolism. Supposedly this man with an exotic background, no experience in anything, talks b.s, completely hides his shady past (NOTHING THERE TO SUPPORT THE BOGUS CLAIM OF BEING UNITER), and you chant and faint..Is this American Idol contest?? Rest of the population should get impressed by this show and vote for your messiah?
And the person who says Hilalry supporters have to vote Obama to meet their “needs”. One of their needs is wanting not to elect an arrogant elitist.
Posted by: Long-term Democrat | May 19, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
“What is coming to the forefront though is that Obama would not be where he is except for the caucus”
That is like saying the other team is only ahead because of lay-ups. If it wasn’t for lay-ups, we would only be behind by a little.
Posted by: X marks the spot | May 19, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
In spite of all the hoopala, press pandering, and large, fanatical crowds, Obama will NOT win in November. Too much of the wrong baggage and bad attitude. All this hype of building him up as so-o-o intelligent, fair minded, etc. is just more audacity of hope because, you all know he isn’t any of those things. He sure slung a lot of mud at Bill, Hillary’s spouse, but, now, don’t pick on Michelle. What lopsided rot !! He is turning out to be such a phony, and unelectable.
Posted by: Bess Cannon | May 19, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Dallas Voter: You certainly have not been given any permission to speak for Texans in my area of San Antonio so limit your inclusivity. Many of my Hispanic and Black female co-workers are outraged that Hillary thinks the only hard working Americans are White! She said it. I am a white 67 year old still working full-time and her remark disgusted me. She is all Clinton name-a hanger-on to her husband’s recognition. What has she accomplished without it? I want a female President too who has made her mark all on her lonesome to really represent women. aYavo Lem: You must be close friends with McAuliffe to have insider information. I will watch for your ‘revelation’ to check the veracity of your comment. Suggest you follow the Paul vs Clinton trial as well and already in the deposition stage in a California Court. Media cannot ignore it forever so be careful about mud slinging.
Posted by: Tricia C | May 19, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
The Clinton supporters are getting shrill. It will not be pretty when you all have to come out of the rabbit hole back to reality. No matter how much spin you put on it or how much you will it not to happen, Hillary will lose her quest to be the nominee. This is just fact, not talking down or up or sideways. It is also not sexist misogynistic or whatever. The majority of voters have spoken and the majority of delegates have spoken. You can spin it but you can’t change it. I am looking forward to when reality sets in. It has to soon and then once you have seen the light, we can conquer the Presidency together. As am aside all the talk about the history of who won which states were in the election not in the primary. And history is not place to look for the answers in this election campaign because it is and will make history as to how it unfolds…..
Posted by: Paul Stewart | May 19, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
The funny part is that while the democrates agrue with each other McCain is laughing all the way to the white house. MG
Posted by: marc grosso | May 19, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
carla…Obama is the one that needs to step aside. Hillary is the better candidate here. Obama is saying he doesn’t want anybody to say anything against his wife in the GE. That is so Hillarious. Hillary has had plenty said about her husband in this Primary by the media, Obama and his supporters. Who does he think he is??? He’s above the normal campaign retoric that he himself uses??? Oh, that’s right…He is a God??? Better than all before him??? Is he going to stop the press from reporting all of his devious past as well? I don’t think so. Freedom opf speech is questionable if Obama is being attacked.
Kentucky and Oregon please blow Obama out of this campaign. I know you can do it!!!
Posted by: carolyn | May 19, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Obama thinks that we Americans injected AIDS into blacks.
Posted by: Samantha | May 19, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Hillary is getting desperate, She is only ahead in the popular vote if you include the Michigan primary, a state that Obama was not even on the ballot and she still found a way to lose 237,762 votes to a candidate called “UNCOMMITTED”. In my book that is not a convincing argument. One would have to assume that those uncommitted voters were Obama supporters that showed loyalty. And I would be willing to bet that the votes that the other two Democratic candidates received probably would have went to Obama as well. That being the case she is still behind in the popular vote anywhere in a range of minimum 63,422 votes to a maximum of 87,493 votes, and that is assuming some of those who voted for Hillary would not have voted for Obama giving the chance. You can not use the popular vote of a state when Both candidates agreed it would not count ahead of time. She is showing her character by trying to cheat to win. Get real Hillary and get out of the way.
Posted by: batesba74 | May 19, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
@OBAMA SUPPORTER – Glad you Obama Supporters don’t need me, not that I was even thinking of casting a vote for the man, lol. You know, you and other supporters of Obama have been saying to Hillary supporters for a long time that Obama doesn’t need our support. Usually it wasn’t said in a very nice way.
I have written in other posts that Obama and his supporters will reap what they have sown.
I also said that their harvest will be very, very bitter. You might want to think about that…
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
(It ain’t over until the lady in the pantsuit says so!)
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 19, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
haha the hillary supporter make me laugh so hard. they’re so hyprocritical just like hillary herself. Wow, first they say delegates should determine the party’s nominee, now it’s popular vote. God, make up your mind and stick to what you say! Hillary agreed to fallow the rules and let MI and FL be punished, and now desperation has come and she changes her mind. Just like she did with Iraq first she said yes and now she says she opposed it from the very beggining.. wow.. true hyprocesy, zero ethics. what a wonderful candidate huh? haha
Posted by: cbfg | May 19, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
The DNC better listen to the Florida and Michigan voters. I am a registered democrat. If my vote doesn’t count again this year because I am a democrat, I will vote Republican or Independent for the rest of my life. We want our votes to count. It is illegal for them to leave us out of the process. We voted when our state told us to vote. We had no choice.
Posted by: carolyn | May 19, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Well, Texas Voter – everybody has their own perspective. Glad you are being amused. lol.
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
(It ain’t over until the lady in the pantsuit says so!)
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 19, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
carolyn.. america has chosen already ok? Obama will be the nominee. Are you even a true democrat? how can you be defending attacks made by the republicans? aren’t you supposed to oppose those kind of politics?
Obama never made a single comment on Hillary’s past as cheated wife. She has gone very far to insult him which have made voters switch sides, we dont want a hypocrite, hatefull candidate.
Posted by: carla | May 19, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Robert, Obama’s name was not on the Michigan ballot because he CHOSE to take it off. It had been there. But he opted to cow-tow to IA & NH, and to Dean’s extremely draconian misinterpretation and perversion of the very “rules” he (Dean) supposedly was defending, and remove his name from the ballot. There was absolutely NO RULE–let’s be crystal clear about that–stating that any candidate should remove his or her name from any ballot. That was totally insane! It was Dean Scream 2008, and most of the candidates went along with it, so now Obama has no one to blame but…hmmm, let’s see: HIMSELF for the fact that he was not on the ballot. And, funny thing: often when you remove your name from a ballot, you don’t get any votes on said ballot. Strange how that works. Does it render the election results themselves invalid? No. All it means is that the candidate who CHOSE to take himself off the ballot doesn’t have as much “judgement” as he is always saying he does.
*shrug*
Posted by: Edna | May 19, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Obama Supporter…Here’s a little education for you.
The RULES for the Democratic Primary process are:
1. To win the nomination of the party in the primaries a candidate Must Win 2025 delegates.
2. If no candidate has done that then the process moves to the convention.
3. The super delegates have no impact during the primaries except to express preferences.
4. At the convention the supers cast their votes for whomever they chose. That choice can be based on any number of criteria, and there is NO oblgation to cast for the candidate that won the most delegates.
The bottom line is that Obama and Clinton will both lost the primaries. Obama has had numerous chances to close the door on Clinton and has failed. So lets see tomorrow in Oregon. Iowa may just be the perfect state for his full circle, but not in the way he is sooooo cocky about.
Posted by: anotherview | May 19, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Tricia C,
Look at the whole Texas map to see how many counties Obama actually got. Yet, Obama won San Antonio but lost almost the whole state in Primary! He spent 4 to 1 in Texas…. and the outcome is so disappointed ha???
When a candidate has nothing to prove, he will sing a song CHANGE. This “hope and change song” will be flushing through a toilette because the its rhythm gradually sounds like BLAHH BLAHH BLAHH …..yawwwww boring!
Posted by: Dallas Voter | May 19, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
It IS almost over. Hillary is pretending to be high spirited, but she knows that Tuesday will be the point where Obama will close the gap to 2025. By Wenesday morning, Obama will have close to 1975 delegates, if not more, and will likely receive a flood of endorsements that will put him over 2025 before May 31. He can then make the case that the race is over and call Hillary to let her know that she needs to withdrawl. Until then, it is just a matter of waiting until Obama crosses that mark, but I’m guessing It will happen withing the next 10 days.
Posted by: Ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Obama supporter,
You really are not supporting your candidate at all. You are just spouting off at the very people that Obama needs to win the Nov. election. It is this type of “supporter” that will lead to the defection of many.
Really I can appreciate your enthusiasm for your candidate but Obama simply can not afford to toss away ANY Hillary voters. Try convincing us why we should cast our vote for Obama instead of pushing us towards McCain. The actions of Obama supporters will weigh in determining our votes.
Posted by: TOM E | May 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Listen, all I ask is that when Hillary looses, those of you who are principled and support Mrs Clinton for not only her many talents but also her legislative agenda and stated goals can let go of this rancor and support Obama in the fall. Some of you people are hate filled, others are simply in denial of the facts but the truth is Obama has this sowed up and unless we want 4 or worse, 8 more years of the same crap we saw under Bush…Democrats best come together.
I hear a lot of ifs- If Michigan & Florida were counted fully (which would be unfair but lets talk for the sake of argument) she’d still loose the nomination. This is a DELEGATE race people, and like it or not she is loosing that race by a margin that cannot be overcome.
When this is over, June 3rd. Take a few days, or weeks and sort through what this race will stand for in the fall. I am certain most if not all will decide Obama is a much better option.
LEt it go.
Posted by: NAte | May 19, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
@OBAMA SUPPORTER – I don’t vote out of hate and bitterness. I just feel that Hillary will make a better president, that after checking out both of their policy positions. Now, you are supposed to be representing the party of “Unity.” Do you really feel that what you wrote to me had anything to do with unity? You should not be angry with me or anyone else because they differ from you. Half of the democrat party differs from you. The other half differs from me. Right? I am not a part of any lunatic fringe and I am pretty d@mn intelligent. Perhaps we should just agree to disagree?
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
(It ain’t over until the lady in the pantsuit says so!)
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 19, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Lets keep this simple. The only metric that matters is delegates. Popular vote never has, and never will, matter. This is a fabrication to keep the thing intersting. It disenfranchises caucus states. Also, this laughable notion of equating this to the GE is another fabrication. The primary process doesn’t map to the GE. There are states that GWB lost in the primary that he won in the GE. So, everyone should be honest, and avoid spit. 2025 is the only number that matters. The second anyone hits that, it’s over.
Posted by: ted | May 19, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Right on Hillary – and to all of you who say the rules are the rules have never worked for a large corporation. Rules and policies are always broken – that is why they have “supervisor overrides” to make exceptions to those rules. So get over that statement. The DNC has lousy rules that have caused a castrophy and should have never disenfranchised voters. Howard Dean screwed up folks – now it for somebody else to fix his major screw-up.
Posted by: Lynn | May 19, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Hillary I really respect you. No one has more strength and tenacity than you. You are amazing and my heart goes out to you.
Posted by: this election counts | May 19, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
To Tom E:
You should vote for Obama instead of McCain because if you look at their voting records, Obama’s voting record is almost identical to Hillary’s. Despite the mudflinging in these primarys, the candidates are very much alike on the issues. McCain has a much different voting record that is more in line with President Bush. I heard on the news that McCain has sided with the President in the last 4 years almost 95% of the time he voted. We do not need another Bush term. The time to turn this country around is now, not 4 disasterous years from now under McCain.
Posted by: Ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Memo to Space Cadet Hillary Clinton:
You agreed to exclude the votes in
Florida and Michigan before the
primaries began! Their popular vote totals will not be counted!
A proportional division of the delegates
of both states will still leave you short! It’s Over!
It’s time for the Super delegates to do
their job and end this process now!
It’s time to show the Arrogant Clintons that they Don’t Own the Democrat Party!
SD’s Do your Job, Now!
Posted by: reaganfan | May 19, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
efox – That is a well laid out, articulate and salient post. Too bad the Zombie Nation will reject it outright because it is too laden with logic and common sense.
What a waste of a good post, huh?
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
I don’t recall the Clinton supporters whining about the process being rigged last year, when it was thought that she was the inevitable nominee and just needed to go through the motions in the first few primaries before everyone else rolled over and crowned her.
Posted by: egb | May 19, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
What part of ‘mathematically impossible’ don’t Hillary or her supporters understand? Quit being such fanatically sore losers and get behind your party’s candidate, or just go on and join the McAncient bandwagon.
Posted by: 40yr old white guy in NC | May 19, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
OBAMA IS THE ONE WHO BROKE THE RULES
Obama chose to remove his name from the ballot in Michigan , then at the time of the election in Michigan, Obama’s supporters called for Obama backers to vote “uncommitted” and give Obama a chance to compete for those delegates in Denver. They did this through radio advertising, formed a new group called Detroiters for Uncommitted Voters (supporters of Obama) and campaigned door to door and on the phone. (Washington Post, 1/9/08, 1/14/08) (Detroit News, 1/10/08, 1/15/08) (Economist, 1/14/08)(AP, 1/10/08).
Obama’s television advertising were seen in Florida even though all democratic candidates agreed not to advertise in Florida or Michigan.
After all that, now he doesn’t want the votes counted because the votes didn’t go his way as hard as he tried.
Posted by: Gwen | May 19, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Good for Hillary – Hang in there Lady – we women are behind you 100% -
If Hillary is not nominated, our votes go to John McCain – never obama, never.
obama followers sure get testy when someone says they won’t vote for obama. Well, there are many, many who won’t vote for obama who will vote for McCain – obama cannot win without these votes – sorry obama Kool aid drinkers.
Posted by: Lou | May 19, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
“You need Kentucky to win the Presidency?”
Doesn’t she say that about every state?
Posted by: Ian | May 19, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Yavo Lem,
This is a serious question. You keep including MI and FL in your math, what is HRC going to do when the DCCC denies her plea to seat the delegates as voted? The DCCC has hinted, strongly, that they would not be buying this agrument. If she is depending on MI and FL to claim the nomination and is denied, then what?
Thank you in advance for replying.
Posted by: Really?
========================================
OK, Really?, taking you at your word that you are asking in all seriousness, I’ll try to give you my reasoning:
1.) Let the Punishment Fit the Crime.
2.) Punish the crooks, not the victims.
3.) FLorida:
All candidate’s names were on the ballot. The citizens of Florida did not reschedule the Primary date. Hillary Clinton did not campaign in the state, as pledged. Barack Obama, on the other hand, had TV ads, and possibly radio ads, running in the state prior to the vote. The citizens of Florida voted in good faith. The results of the vote have been validated and certified by the Secretary of State of Florida. Therefore, the delegates of Florida should be allocated to the candidates as is, without any reduction or reallocation. There is no need for a revote.
As to punishment, a substantial fine, in the form of a contribution to the DNC campaign fund, which needs the money, would be appropriate.
4.) Michigan:
As in Florida, the citizens of Michigan did not move the date of the Primary. Initially, all three candidates, Clinton, Obama and Edwards, were on the ballot. For some reason, Obama and Edwards CHOSE to remove their names, telling their supporters to vote “UNCOMMITTED” (wink, wink). The voters voted in good faith, at least for Clinton. The vote totals have been validated and certified by the Secretary of State. Michigan could not arrange a fair revote, since Senator Edwards had dropped out. Clinton’s delegates should be allocated to her in accordance with the vote. Since there cannot be a fair revote, and since no one can tell which of the “UNCOMMITED” votes belong to Obama and which belonged to Edwards, and since Edwards has now endorsed Obama, he should be awarded the delegates allocated to the “UNCOMMITED” vote.
As to punishment, the State of Michigan should, like Florida, be assessed a substantial fine, payable to the DNC Campaign Fund.
5.) Do not disenfranchise the 2,013,677 voters who cast their ballots for Clinton and Obama in Florida and for Clinton and “UNCOMMITTED” in Michigan.
6.) There are 50 states that should FULLY PARTICIPATE in the Democratic Party Primary races, not 48.
7.) Florida and Michigan were not the only two states to have advanced their Primary dates, so, if Florida and Michigan are penalized, the others must be penalized, too. What is sauce for the gander is sauce for the goose.
8.) The DNC has a duty and responsibility to the voters first, to the candidates second and to the states last. To not exercise this accordingly would be dereliction of duty and irresponbile in the extreme.
So, Really?, those are my thoughts on the issue, and I sent something similar to the DNC a few days ago, and I called them as well. The call was to Mr. Tom McMahon’s office and I spoke to someone there for nearly half an hour. I was told that mine was no where near the first call they had received, but that it was the politest so far. I don’t know whether or not that was political diplomacy.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 19, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
If Lou were a true democrat, voting for a democrat in the fall would be a no-brainer. I stick by my pledge to vote for the nominee, whomever receives that title.
Posted by: Ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
ha ha Schlinda, Barack doesn’t have that problem because America wants him
Posted by: micmacarac | May 19, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
If Obama is the democratic nominee,I will change my party affiliation to Independent and will be voting for McCain in the fall. I will have not left the democratic party, the democratic party will have left me. Obama’s lack of experience, voting record (& lack there of), views on America, alliances with terrorists such as William Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, Nadhmi Auchi, Rezko etc.., and his close relationship with the America hater Rev. Wright and whatever else may arise, make him not the best democratic candidate. The democratic party has merrily danced as they’ve jumped off a cliff before and this time I will not be with them.
My choice has nothing to do with ethnicity, gender or hurt feelings. It’s about the person and what he represents. Obama doesn’t represent me.
Posted by: Gwen | May 19, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
to all of you hillary supporters:
Do you really believe that a candidate who’s already in debt (20 million) could be a good president and help america get out of its own debt? I dont think so, she has demonstrated no abilities to manage a campaign so i hate to imagine the damage she could cause to our country. She is not prepared. maybe in a few years when she learns her lessons from this campaign.
TRUE DEMOCRATS WILL NOT VOTE FOR MAC WAR IN NOVEMBER
Posted by: cbfg | May 19, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
In Michigan, everyone who wanted to be was on the ballot. Rightly so. If anyone decided to pull their name out of the contest, that’s their prerogative. Each contestant receives her own share of voters. However, the “undecided” will have to be split between contestants running… if there is only one candidate left, well then she takes all. Rule of the game.
Posted by: Retrovvision | May 19, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Texas Voter
Have you ever been Oregon. Oregon voters are precisely the demographic that favor Obama. 75,000 Oregonians turned out to see him on Sunday. It’s going to be a blowout in Oregon. Just look what hapopened in Oregon’s neighbor, Washington State.
Posted by: greenpoint | May 19, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Texas Voter
Have you ever been Oregon? Oregon voters are precisely the demographic that favor Obama. 75,000 Oregonians turned out to see him on Sunday. It’s going to be a blowout in Oregon. Just look what hapopened in Oregon’s neighbor, Washington State.
Posted by: greenpoint | May 19, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
If the rules were different, Obama would have campaigned differently. So that argument doesn’t stick. By the way, Clinton running out of arguments to make.
Posted by: ocotillo | May 19, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Sounds like Hillary is edging from the denial phase into anger.
Posted by: Drew Rocker | May 19, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Thanks Dallas Voter for the good info:D
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
(It ain’t over until the lady in the pantsuit says so!)
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 19, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Those who believe that personality is greater than the party are not democrat, something else !
They are bad American !
Posted by: Politra | May 19, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Dear Obama supporter:
Thank you for your response. I understand your frustration.
I also, NEVER EVER supported this travesty of a war. I am truly angered that everyday we appear to get deeper and deeper into Iraq and further from leaving.
As for the bad behaving Hillary supporters. I am not looking to them to convince me why I should or should not support Obama if (most likely when) he wins the nomination. I would prefer it if she won but it doesn’t look like she will so I’m prepairing to start assessing the other two, and honestly I don’t know much of Obama’s plans and stradegies. I would like to know why his supporters support him.
Thanks
Posted by: Tom E | May 19, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Marginalizing of woman have been business as usual for hundreds of years, but we see them: Old, white, rich, senior-Dems. Biden, Dole and puppetMaster Kennedy, who got so upset Hillary isn’t going away Kennedy had an anxiety-attack and was rushed to hospital. They needed an unknown, African-American to steal her base, but she has proven stronger than anyone could imagine, getting voters from a widerange, people who remember prosperity, peace and a well-managed economy. Stay in there Hillary, the more we get to know “sweetie”, the better we like you.
Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 19, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
micmacarac,
If America wants Obama, why he just got 1/2 of the votes so far from Democrat party only???? Talk about the Primary Election in November. He will be faded like GHOST!
Posted by: Dallas Voter | May 19, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
You can’t win the Presidency without winning Kentucky? HAHAHAHAHA
Posted by: J.D. | May 19, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
To the original commenter: Since when are Oregon, Washington, Connecticut, Vermont, D.C, Maryland, Wisconsin, Delaware, Minnesota and Maine Republican strongholds?
Get your head straight. Is your wounded pride really more important than having a Democrat in the white house? Obama’s policies are almost exactly identical to Clinton’s. You’re doing nothing but being a sore loser.
Posted by: RedLion | May 19, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
yeah, sore IN DEBT loser.
Posted by: cbfg | May 19, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
thinkindem.. dont get mad im just trying to get you informed. Im doing you a little favor.
Im not tryin to influence anyone. I just want people to learn more about their candidates and their campaigns. And you cant deny her campaign is a mess.. what a shame.
Posted by: cbfg | May 19, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
No, actually i’ve been very confident thoroughout the primaries. I knew deep inside Americas was longing for change. Im not scared, no, im more than sure he will the party’s nominee and win the general elections. that’s just the way its going to be.. :)
Posted by: cbfg | May 19, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
WOW!!! Things are heating up again internally. It always seems that just before a state primary Hillary realizes that in less that 48 hours her dream will get much, much harder. “We don’t have a nominee yet!!!” Well, almost certainly, Hillary will not be the nominee. On Friday, after all the Bush/McCain “appeasment” jibberish, Ole Huckster had to get a jab in. That probably did him in as far as VP.
Go Democrats First/Go Obama or Clinton 2008
Posted by: Bruh Man | May 19, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Answer me this: Why, exactly, are the Clinton supporters (I used to be one, until she started putting herself ahead of her ideals) who are talking of voting for McCain willing to subject this nation to another 4 years of war, belligerance, economic mismanagement, environmental degradation, societal fear-peddling, blatant lies, subversion of basic rights and freedoms, the conversion of America into an underground theocracy, and international shunning? Is your anger at Hillary’s loss that all-consuming?
Posted by: RedLion | May 19, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
OOOO, thinkingdem. Do you have anything to bolter your argument here or are you just choosing the, “Well, that what YOU think, Mr. Poopy Pants!” route?
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
So you dems want to run the country, but you can’t even run a primary process. Good luck in Denver, it will be must see tv.
Posted by: GTERPS | May 19, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
REDLION you’re so right! a true democrat would never go republican over bitterness and anger.
Posted by: cbfg | May 19, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Dear Americans !
You are under the observation of the whole world.
Do not belittle the America !
Some people are looking badly racist !
Posted by: Politra | May 19, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Clinton is correct about the electoral math, but the irony is that it won’t matter within the Democratic Party, and Obama will be the nominee anyway. The truth is, she would be harder to beat in the swing states. (Obama is not even competitive in Florida, and is well behind McCain in Ohio). On the other hand, the superdelegates know that if they hand Clinton the nomination, they will be perceived to have “stolen” it from Obama, and that alone would doom Clinton in the general election. Either way, McCain is getting a significant edge, and may well win in November, all in a year that, by all rights, the Republicans should lose in a landslide.
Posted by: Republican Observer | May 19, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Go, Hillary, go! Our nation needs you and your supporters demand you stay in! And for Obama Supporter, you are living in a pipe dream thinking our anger will somehow magically dissipate by November. Obama’s mandate to be “nice to Clinton supporters’ have only added fuel to the fire. So try not to add more, ok? We reject Obama, we don’t like him, trust him, or accept him as the Democratic nominee. We will in fact vote for McCain or a third party candidate to voice our displeasure with the Democratic party’s hijacking of this nomination process and we will also vote against Obama, not for McCain, but against Obama, to protest his silent and his no so silent complicity with the sexism, as well as his overt disrespect to Hillary, his middle finger salute, his “likable enough” comments, his brushing his shoulders and his shoes when Hillary beat him in the primary, his bitter gate, sweetic gate, Wrightgate, you name it we have reasons to hate the man. We have Operation Turndown, Operation Independent, Clinton Supporters Count Too, we have more grassroots activists forming to denounce Obama and the DNC than you can count, and yet, the DNC doesn’t seem to hear, see, or understand the anger that is simmering all across this country. We’ve seen tee shirts with “life’s a bitch, don’t elect one”. We’ve seen worse, we’ve heard worse, we’ve had our own elected representatives including Obama, joking that Clinton could be explained away on any given day because she was just on her period. Obama’s “periodically, she is feeling down” comments. And all his surrogates just copy his lead. And this is the man you want as our President? No way. We will not only not vote for him, we will actively work against him. It ain’t over yet, not by a long shot.
Posted by: jdona | May 19, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Really not attempting to be disrespectful, I’m honestly confused. Because if Obama were to be beaten and Clinton somehow emerge the victor at this stage, I’d be infuriated, enraged, and talk of at least staying home…for awhile. Then, come November, I would swallow my pride and vote for Hillary, because I love this country too damned much to allow another 4 years of hard-line Republican policies. Why isn’t the reverse true? I understand, some of you just don’t like Obama. But if/when Clinton drops out of the race, it’s Obama who will represent her ideology. I know you’re angry, I would be too. But is that a reason to actively destroy everything that she worked for?
Posted by: RedLion | May 19, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
thinkingdem i dont fallow any plans. I just speak the truth and it seems to me you have a really hard time dealing with it.. well its something people call denial maybe.. hehe. it’s ok many people have experienced your problem so from now on im only going to respond to people who are willing to argue intelligently like civilized human beings
OBAMA’08
Posted by: cbfg | May 19, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
I don’t think that Clinton is right about the electoral math. Kentucky and Tenn would be lost anyway. But Obama is becoming competative in Texas, Virginia, and the Carolinas. And also is competative in Florida. Polls tend to undercount Obama in high black areas because their weighting of the significance of black voter turnout is based on past election models. Black turnout has been double of that in the past during the primaries, and may be even higher if Obama is the nominee. This could make a 5% swing from what the polls now say, and all of those states above that I mentioned are within those 5 points.
Posted by: Sanity Man | May 19, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Tom E
The reasons why I support Obama are his energy policy, his commitment to ending the war in Iraq in order to make America safer by redeploying them to Afganistan and reserving troops for unforseen crisis. Afghanistan has been more stable than Iraq until the surge in Iraq. We need more troops in Afghanistan in order for a possible deployment to the drug-lord region of northwest Pakistan. I do not believe Obama will declare war with Pakistan, but he will no doubtedly pursue Osama Bin Laden in that region. It is thick with terrorists, but Bush has been hesitant to invade it for fear of retaliation against the democratic gov’t of Pakistan. Obama’s energy policy is long-term thinking. He is an advocate of electric cars and wind and solar energy. McCain wants to use nuclear energy that has the potential to kill and harm thousands of people. Nuclear plants can cause birth defects in the children of nearby residential neighborhoods. A possible meltdown can cause the loss of thousands of lives, not to mention the harm to the environment and drinking water of neighboring towns and cities.
Obama has a very good strategy for foreign policy. Engage your enemies in purposeful negotiations and talks. The only way to change our situation with Iran and other countries is to open up dialogue and get to understand where they are coming from. For example, take racism. We can make judgements about members of the other race, but if we get to know individuals of the other race, we stop generalizing them and start to think differently about them. The same can be said for our relations with other countries. When we don’t talk with them, we tend to generalize. But if our President is talking with them and we get to hear the conversations between individuals from the nations, we start to see why we are the same, instead of why we are different. They stop generalizing us, and we stop generalizing them. I don’t have much time to say more, as I am studying for an exam, but I really do have much more to say. I only wish I had more time to share it with you. Thanks for keeping an open mind. We all need to do that if we intend to really change things in this country.
Posted by: Ryan | May 19, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Thinkingdem: what evidence is there that Clinton, who holds a seat as a Democratic senator and presumably believes that she has a future in the party, is even considering running as an independent if she loses the nomination to Obama? It goes without saying that, if she were to do so, she would split the Democratic vote with Obama (the nomineee), and that McCain would win by a very large margin.
I don’t get it.
Posted by: Republican Observer | May 19, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
jdona, are you telling me you think Hillary Clinton is honest? Are you really telling me that the Clintons didn’t disgrace the White House with lies and scandal?
Just on this issue alone…are you telling me you don’t care, or is there some other excuse we should let them try again?
Posted by: twotraps | May 19, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
yes ryan!! we all love obama for all those reason you mentioned. he’s the best candidate.
Posted by: cbfg | May 19, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Republican Observer – That is the beauty of Zombie Nation anti logic. It doesn’t even need a toehold in fact in our world to work.
Remember, these are the same mental giants that gave us such hits as the Scooby Doo Defense and the ever popular Press Conspiracy Theory.
Just a laugh a minute!
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Once again, as per the rule book delegates and superdelegates elect the nominee at the convention. Hillary should stay in it and let the due process take it course.
Posted by: Long-term Democrat | May 19, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Cool down everybody. Millions can’t go wrong in theire choices. It’s a matter of belief. At the end of the day, whom ever gets the magical number will be the nominee. I believe both HC and BO are highly qualified. Question is: Do we want the Dems to take the White House or not? Hit the Reps not the Dems.
Posted by: Wxyz | May 19, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Sanity Man: I will concede that polls can be misleading, and that Obama’s chances in Florida and Ohio may be better than I implied. By the same token, however, it is fair to say that McCain currently has an edge over Obama in both of those states, and that Clinton fares better against McCain in those states than Obama does. The same is true of Penn. and Arkansas. I will admit that, unlike Clinton, Obama could put certain red states in play (North Carolina, Nevada, Colorado), and is more likely to win Iowa than Clinton. But it is hard to see how a Democrat can win without winning two out of the following three: Ohio, Penn. and Florida. Right now, Obama faces an uphill battle in two and an even race in one; Clinton leads McCain in all three.
Posted by: Republicn Observer | May 19, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Republican Observer: What aboutMinnesota and Wisconsin that have Obama beating McCain by a fair margin, but Clinton losing to McCain?
Posted by: RedLion | May 19, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
No one is arguing that point, Long-term Democrat. She has every right to go on, no matter how self serving and sad it looks.
As we have seen, the polls clearly show Obama getting stronger, and since he’s already engaged John McCain full bore, the GE debate has finally begun.
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Hillary should have done a credit check on herself before loaning her campaign so much money!
Posted by: Harry Walter | May 19, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
I FEEL SO SORRY FOR ALL OF YOU AND YOUR HATRED AND PREJUDICES. THAT HAVE CAUSE YOU TO FOGET ABOUT THE PARTY. NONE OF CAN STAND ANOTHER 4 YRS OF A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT, AND I KNOW IN YOUR HEART OF HEARTS THAT’S NOT WHAT YOU WANT. BUT YOUR PREJUDICE WILL NOT LET YOU STAND WITH YOUR PARTY. FOR YEARS BLACK PEOPLE HAVE HAD TO VOTE FOR PEOPLE THAT I KNEW DID NOT HAVE THEIR INTEREST AT HEART BUY THEY STAYED WITH THE PARTY ANYWAY. FOR ALL OF YOU THAT SAY IF HILLARY DOES NOT GET IT YOU WILL NOT VOTE YOUR PARTY. EVERY TIME TO GO TO THE GROCERY STORE OR PUMP GAS THINK ABOUT IT YOUR POCKET CAN’T STAND ANOTHER 4 YRS PUT ASIDE YOUR HATRED LONG ENOUGH TO DO WHAT’S RIGHT FOR A CHANGE. LOOK AT WHERE BUSH HAS GOTTEN US THE LAST 4 YEARS MY GOD PEOPLE
Posted by: sula | May 19, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Same message but without tpyos. sorry
Sisters
Listen to what you are saying. Your ego’s are engaged. This is bigger than each of us. You are saying that it is more important to make an anti Obama statement and vote for McCain. How about your daughters.
You are making a decision that the courts can be overturned for more than 4 years. that your children will fight an unjust war. All of this because you fell slighted. It is about the future for our children not our hurt feelings
Posted by: kathy | May 19, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Nice. It looks like Obush is going to get the nod from the dems and we can look forward to 4 more years of inexperience and incompetence in the white house.
Posted by: Obush | May 19, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
The total pledeged delegates available nationwide is 3253. Whichever candidate wins more than 50% of that total, wins the pleged delegates. Half of 3253 is 1626.5. Senator Obama is 17 pleged delegates away from winning. He will win the 17 pleged delegates up tomorrow, and wrap up the race for pleged delegates. This is why HRC and her campaign are now trying to change the total delegates now. She is again trying to change the established rules because she is losing.
By the time all the voting is done, Senator Obama will need less than 25 superdelegates, than he current has. He will also get those after tomorrow.
HRC is a very, very sore loser, and it is unbecoming.
Posted by: Munk | May 19, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
ObamaforPresident – Hard for me to imagine any deal that would include a payback of her loans. In addition, her crowds are getting smaller (just look at the tens of people that turned out today in KY!). He poll numbers nationally are going down so fast, I’m getting the Bends. The longer she stays, the less leverage she has. If she wants to commit political suicide, who am I to say no?
OBAMA SUPPORTER – I had the feeling that was the case. I haven’t seen that many trolls outside of a Tolkien novel.
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Republicn Observer – PA, FL, & OH are always on the bubble, but you are right for now (except that polls I have seen have PA for either dem). WV can be a pick up for Clinton, but she loses MI & WI. Obama picks up NM, NV, & CO so I think that he expands the race beyond the traditional “must have 2 out of 3 states” you mentioned. It’s early and these states will change back and forth. It will be an interesting election. Since you seem to be level headed I look forward to posting with you.
Posted by: Sanity Man | May 19, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Obama took advantage of the DNC’s screwed up method for allocating delegates by dominating the process in caucus states he won’t even win in November. OK, he has the lead in delegates, but he has not proven he can win the important states. Hillary is right, her wins reflect 300 electoral v. his 217. He cannot win. Supers Step Up and fix this mess, PLEASE.
Posted by: Roger | May 19, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
I think the Obama campaign should use the same methodology to count rally attendance as they do to count PLEDGED DELEGATES:
“If you count heads on the way in you get 37,500, but if you count feet, you get 75,000. Math is great! And so is human anatomy. Now it they were only cows, it would be 150,000! See how it works?”
“Whoa! Awesome!”
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 19, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Munk – your math looks good, but I have to say that since Indiana Hillary has not engaged in the usual “kitchen sink” strategy. She’s intellegent and knows that there is less than 1% chance of losing and a very big chance of losing power for her, and Bill if she plays down and dirty in these last few weeks. It looks like she is trying to rack up support for herself, and extend the time that she has to collect money to payherself back her loans. I think that the only part that is unethical now is to take donations to a lost cause in order to pay back her loans. She made the loan to herself and lost, so she should take the hit, not convince a true beleiver that it does some good to give her hard earned money.
Posted by: Sanity Man | May 19, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Obama started running for Prez in his FIRST year in the Senate.
Dude!! His FIRST year!!
Many people would vote for McCain over Obama for the exact reason they would vote for Hillary over Obama…because Obama simply is not qualified at this time to be President. A lot of people feel we are being unloyal democrats. Darn right!! America first. The democratic party second. It’s as simple as that.
Posted by: Phil | May 19, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
This native Texas gal isn’t letting the pundits and “elders” in a political party dictate to her anymore about who she is to vote for. I’m perfectly fine with voting for my local/state democrats but will either be voting for Hillary or writing in her name or simply not filling in any bubble on my ballot for choice of president in November. As long as we control the house and senate, McCain is powerless in White House when he wins (and if Obama is our nominee, McCain will beat him). I’m hoping voters in the swing states that matter (as Texas does not in the general), that are upset with the DNC, the media, discriminatory and prejudiced reporting, etc., will still go to the polls and vote for state/local democrats, and then write in Hillary’s name. That would show the DNC and the “elders” of the DNC that we are sick and tired of their s–t and we aren’t taking it anymore. No more will we support putting a doofus in the White House. Obama is a weaker candidate than Kerry, and we all know how well that went for us…
Posted by: Kim in Texas | May 19, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Hillary seems to have “fuzzy math” in common with our current failed President.
In case Hillary is unaware, which is doubtful, Obama is now only 105 delegates away from the nomination.
Time for Hillary to leave the land of Denial, it’s truly pathetic.
Posted by: tim | May 19, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Kim – But… but… but… Hillary IS the Democratic establishment! In fact, she has 15 of the members for the Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting May 31st, by FAR the most of anybody.
How do you explain that, other than Obama won fair and square DESPITE these kinds of advantages Hillary had?
Seriously, explain to me how?
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
I think a lot of HRC supporters vote for her as a write-in candidate, and this might cost the Dems the election. Where HRC supporters are kidding themselves, though, is if they believe such a loss would allow her to run for president in 2012. The intensity of anger among Obama supporters would be, well, the same. The Dems would lose two elections. And this rift in the party would be a lot like the one which beset the Dems during the 1970s (who were the ultimate benecieries? Ronald Reagan and the GOP).
Posted by: Keviin | May 19, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
I think a lot of HRC supporters vote for her as a write-in candidate, and this might cost the Dems the election. Where HRC supporters are kidding themselves, though, is if they believe such a loss would allow her to run for president in 2012. The intensity of anger among Obama supporters would be, well, the same. The Dems would lose two elections. And this rift in the party would be a lot like the one which beset the Dems during the 1970s (who were the ultimate benecieries? Ronald Reagan and the GOP).
Posted by: Keviin | May 19, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
As an independent voter, I am a little confused. Do Democratic Super-delegates only come into play if no candidate reaches the magic number (whatever it is)? Are they pledged delegates or free to choose at the convention? If neither candidate reaches the ‘magic number’ at the end of the primaries, can’t the Super-delegates vote any way they choose as they are not pledged delegates? This seems confusing, but if Super-delegates can freely change their minds up to the last minute, this race could be open to both Hillary and Obama.
I have been unable to have an input so far since I am an Independent FL voter.
Posted by: freeethinker | May 19, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
As an independent voter, I am a little confused. Do Democratic Super-delegates only come into play if no candidate reaches the magic number (whatever it is)? Are they pledged delegates or free to choose at the convention? If neither candidate reaches the ‘magic number’ at the end of the primaries, can’t the Super-delegates vote any way they choose as they are not pledged delegates? This seems confusing, but if Super-delegates can freely change their minds up to the last minute, this race could be open to both Hillary and Obama.
I have been unable to have an input so far since I am an Independent FL voter.
Posted by: freeethinker | May 19, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Freethinker,
your questions have a simple answer: tomorrow if Hillary fails to win by 99.99% in Ky and OR, Obama will clinch the nomination. It is really simple.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Clinton should be happy she is a senator. She had a great plan since 2000 but the american people have spoken. We don’t want 24+ years of Bush-Clinton. We want change. We want the best candidate. We want Obama!
Posted by: Daniel | May 19, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Clinton says Not So Fast to Obama claiming victory after Tuesday. Not So Fast, Hillary. Who says he’s claiming victtory? The report is he’s planning to claim a majority of the Pledged Delegates. Why is Clinton spinning this thing the wrong way? Do you think it’s to get her fans energized by the “injustice” of Obama claiming a true fact?
Posted by: TexasWoman | May 19, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
She’s making a complete fool of herself at this point. Never thought I’d see a meltdown like this from her … who would have thought?
Posted by: dgfiit | May 19, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
How Obama and Bush compare. A British perspective.
Both are run by others. Both are inarticulate. Both make increadible gaffs.
Obams: ‘America has 57 states’
ask yourselves, ‘what is world out side of the US thinking).
Posted by: ted | May 19, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Freethinker–
I believe it’s not truly over until the convention in August. Super-delegates can change their minds up until then. After the convention the DNC is stuck with whomever is chosen.
Posted by: Gwen | May 19, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Red Lion: I was not aware that McCain was leading Clinton in Wisc. and Minn, and would be very surprised if he were able to beat her in those states. In any case, of course there are many states where one or the other of them is ahead, or behind McCain. Obama has a chance at Nevada; McCain has a chance at New Hampshire and maybe even Connecticut. My point is that, notwithstanding the many creative scenarios that one might imagine, a Democrat cannot write off Ohio, Florida and Penn.. Obama has a good chance in Penn. against McCain (but the state is definitely within reach of either of them), but I think he loses Ohio and Florida. I could be wrong, of course; it is very early to make that kind of prediction. But Clinton does better in all three of those very important states. From my (i.e., Republican) perspective, the electoral college looks better against Obama.
Posted by: Republican Observer | May 19, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Hillary should exit and endorse Obama tomorrow if she fails to win OR and KY with 99.99%.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Yes I am a mindless bot. I tow the party line no matter what. I have pledged my allegiance to the Democratic Party and not my country. Typical Americans are mean and bitter and cling to their bibles and guns. Change must be achieved at all costs.
Posted by: Mack | May 19, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Hey all, thanks for the answers. We will wait and see. I think Barack is an inspirational speaker – since his ’04 speech. I want CHANGE, but I hardly know any specifics of the changes he promises. I hear Barack state why he is against his opponents stance, but hardly hear his clear view of the change promised. What will he change? will the current politicians allow this?
Posted by: freeethinker | May 19, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Emily – Heal thyself.
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Hillary is probably planning on fighting for the DEM nomination all the way to 2012…This is her choice. But as far as 2008, some maths already show that Hillary is axed. My maths point that she should win OR and KY by 99.99% to delay the inevitable. If she fails then she should pack, exit, endorse Obama, beg for a debt relief and go fishing somewhere.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
You nailed it Emily.
Posted by: Mack | May 19, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
We got it, Emily. You’re a bitter, bitter, oh so bitter individual. Message received.
No need to keep hitting Post like a county fair chicken hoping to get its pellet reward…
Posted by: Texas Voter | May 19, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Freethinker,
there 3 remaining contenders until the polls close tomorrow. 2 of them represent the status quo. 2 of them have lobbysts running their campaigns. 2 of them are poorly managing their campaign funds. More importantly, 2 of them voted for the war. 1 represents change, does not accept lobbyist in his campaign, manage effectively his campaign funds and did not support the war. The change candidate is Barack. He is just 17 delegates away from clinching the Dem nomination.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
HAHAHA Disregard that (You know what goes here)
Posted by: emily | May 19, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Clinton supporters,
I know it hurts, and I know you’ve been working on this for the past 7-8 yrs. Maybe longer.
but….IT’S OVER!!!
Go ahead, finish the rest of the states. Let every vote be counted. But, all this talk about “we can still win”, just stop it!!
At this point you all are looking sad, desperate and pathetic.
I mean have some dignity……GEESH !!
Posted by: AutoCadSkills | May 19, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Junior Senator Obama should quite tomorrow and endorse presidential candidate Hillary Clinton – the only serious option for the Democrats to win the White House – he might still get a chance to be on her cabinet and learn a lot before his next attempt.
Posted by: Retrovvision | May 19, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
The media and the Democratic party don’t want Mr. Obama or Mrs. Clinton to be president. They want Mr. McCain, because is in their best interest to keep those taxes “No to roll back”. Why do you think the media and the leaders of the Democratic party are keeping the party divided? Because most of them are millionaires.
Posted by: alice | May 19, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Gwen
the decision to go to war was the most single important decision to make in recent US history. Hillary and McCain had the poor judgement to vote for the war. No wonder they are running a chaotic campaign managed by Washington Lobbyists.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Emily, thanks for the info about Obama posters. I know what they are trying to do, but having been through this process before on the message boards, I think they should feel some official heat, too.
I great confidence on a very close contest in Oregon tomorrow and also a great win in Kentucky. The numbers are on Hillary’s side and Obama knows it, as his absence in Kentucky indicates.
Also big rally are relatively meaningless, especially when staged on a Sunday two days, actually one, before all ballots have to be received, by mail. How many of those people have yet to vote, and how fast is the US Postal Service? I think we all know the answer to that one. I just wonder where they parked all the buses.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 19, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Change that you can believe in, even if you don’t know what is going to be changed or why or how. The man with little or no past accomplishments shall bring this change forth.
Posted by: Mack | May 19, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
It isn’t about Hillary or Obama anymore. It is about winning the white house as a democrat.
========================================
Actually, not really. I’ve bad news for you. It seems you are a “party loyalist”. Hillary should take it to the convention floor and figt it out. If it leads to ensuring McCain presidency so be it.
Why Obama is completely unacceptable. He is a charlatan, racist, bad idea for the country. Also how much of bullies, sexists the candidate Obama and his maniacs and the meida whores who have been hostile to Hillary- they all deserve what they deserve.
McCain will be a much much better choice if Hillary is not the dem nominee.
Posted by: Long-term Democrat | May 19, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
There is something very wrong with Obama. Just a gut feeling. To all of you out there… stop and hear what he has said and even more…what he has not said? I think he is evil. I think he is a wolf in sheep clothing. Change? What Change? He has said nothing except he keeps repeating, it’s time for change…he just keeps repeating Change? Change what? Change our country into an un believing Nation with no God? He doesn’t ever say he belives in God. Our country was formed… on One Nation under God! He is not what he wants us to think he is. Bad, Bad ,Bad.
Posted by: Carol Harrison | May 19, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
This election is not over until Hillary or McCain wins.
Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 19, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
McCain couldn’t get 75 grand at a rally if he gave away free gas.
Posted by: AutoCadSkills | May 19, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
If Hillary wins OR and KY by 99.99% then Obama won’t declare victory. If she fails then it will be over forever in 2008. The winner is….
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Yavo Lem (the real one):
I just want you to know I appreciate your posts on this and other threads.
It’s no picnic being a Hillary supporter, but I believe it’ll be worth it in the end.
Posted by: Emily | May 19, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Obama would be a disaster for the country.
Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 19, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
How would she make it to the convention with $50 million in campaign debts? Be real, the fat lady is already grabing the mic. As soon as the polls close tomorrow in OR and KY, the fat lady will be taking over and that will be the end of the Clinton invincible myth.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Obama would not win in the election. McCain is a bright light in the darkness.
Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 19, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
The question is which one walks the dog Obama or Michelle?
Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 19, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
LET”S TAKE A POLL….You are wasting your time.
Cowards can’t admit their sad opinions even hiding behind a computer screen!!
Posted by: AutoCadSkills | May 19, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
LET”S TAKE A POLL,
My family and I including friends of mine for a total of 47. We will not for Obama. PERIOD!
Posted by: Tess, TX | May 19, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
I don’t get the objection to Obama by many of the Clinton supporters. The nominating “process” has been going on since Iowa. Obama is winning by all of the different measures. If you are going to complain about losing and then go off in a huff you are are part of the whole culture of non-responsibility that plagues the country. If you enter a contest and you lose that’s the way it goes. If you truly think a supreme court majority of 7-2 with Alioto II and Roberts II added will be better for women you obviously don’t understand most of Clinton’s positions. Read the latest decision on workplace inequality that the Roberts court came up with last year and then try to claim you are a supporter of women’s rights. It is very scary that my daughter’s rights are about to be trashed because many of Clinton’s female supporters don’t know how to be honorable in defeat.
Posted by: JLA | May 19, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
bettym47,
I agree with you totally. I am glad to see nowadays people don’t go with the party like they used to be. We would vote for the best candidate, not for the party.
Posted by: Tess, TX | May 19, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Even ferraro said she isn’t sure is she will vote for Obama if he is the nominee. It isn’t a big surprise, but all the same, I think it is funny. I hope Obama loses his ass in the general.
Posted by: fitch | May 19, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
how can every body claim that Obama is the nominee. none of the candidates will get the 2025 number to wine the nomination. In my openion, after all states are done voting, we will have abot 100 to 150 delegates difference. at that time, Hillary can easly over take him with Michigan and Florida. I would say go Hillary go, go Hillary go,go Hillary go,go Hillary go, go Hillary go. All the way to the convention
Posted by: shazly | May 19, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Yes I prefer Hillary. I admit she’s not going to get the nod. But I really admit here in the privacy of my home office that Obama is getting a big push by the blacks. If Obama was just getting 10% of the white vote, we would have day and night coverage about the racism of white voters. Sorry, turn-around is fair play. We are sending someone to the big show who has barely been at bat in the minor leagues. Almost no resume, and a speaking style that gets older every day. There is only so much “black minister voice” that anyone can take before they puke. Obama is where he is because he is black, pure and simple. He is a black Tony Robbins…;.I wouldn’t vote for Tony Robbins either.
Posted by: BigMO | May 19, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Texas Voter,
No matter how many kisses you blow to Obama, Texas will go for Republican. No chance for Obama here. Hillary can make a different here but not Obama.
Posted by: Tess, TX | May 19, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Looks like the agent of change is sitting on top of the same old political trash heap with usual cast of characters. Change…a facade that you can believe in.
Posted by: Mack | May 19, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
MATH AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH:
I do know, and I’m afraid that it’s you that’s wrong. Not that’s it’s any of your business, but my mother has been a super delegate for many moons. Hillary will go to the floor, whether you’re up for it or not.
Posted by: Emily | May 19, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
HRC will do any thing to make obama weak in november and as for her supporters are hating obama with a way you think he is the devil or something
Posted by: usdem | May 19, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
BO may lose by the widest margin ever in a presidential election. However, I predict the Dems will regain more house and Senate seats and governors mansions that John McCain will wish he never ran cause he will be a lame duck president for four years.
Posted by: Terry Mason | May 19, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Is TX the only state that McSame will win? I ama afraid he might lose at home in Arizona.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
She’s right, this is nowhere near over. It was over a while ago, and we are drifting farther and farther past “over.”
Posted by: Dave in Albuquerque | May 19, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
McCain is preparing the dream ticket since he sees no difference between Hillary and him. It is going to be McCain- Hillary on the GOP ticket. The Hills should celebrate tomorrow. Hillary used to be a Republican, she speaks like them now, she praises Fox New and voted for the republican war for oil. Once on the ticket, she will attack her previous Dem healthcare plan, promote more use of the military, and answer the phone at 3 am in Bosnia.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Patti Solis Doyle who is Hillary former campaign manager is about to join Barack Obama. Get real, it is over for Hillary in 2008 unless she wins tomorrow in OR and KY by 99.99%.
Posted by: Sheila | May 19, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Messageboards like this make me realise how, against all odds, Democrats manage to steal defeat from the Jaws of victory.
Only six months ago, everyone was playing nice, Clinton was ahead everywhere by 30 points, and Democrats were excited.
Along comes a virtual nobody, who rides to success upon a wave of..umm.. *people* and builds an efficient campaign which not only challenges Clinton, it looks like it may defeat her.
Why does he not deserve to be the nominee? He’s not the one who began as a household name, with 100 million dollars.
I can understand those preferring Clinton, but chosing to vote McCain instead shows that you’re completely biased… if you were voting for ‘experience’ only.. would you vote for him over Clinton? As he has more experience? Yeesh!
Posted by: TF | May 19, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Hillary is going to lose the nomination. Furthermore, she will have to come back here to NY and run in 2012 for her Senate seat – unless she decides to give it up to run for President again. You know that’s not going to happen.
If Hillary alienates enough Obama supporters in 2008, it may turn around and backfire on her in 2012. Will Hillary be so sure of her chances in 2012 that she will give up her Senate seat to run for the White House? And can she run an effective Presidential campaign if a strong Democratic challenger comes after her in NY in 2012, especially one backed by Obama supporters?
And that’s assuming Obama loses in 2008. If he wins, her plans are on ice until 2016. Then, she’s running against Obama’s VP who will have eight years experience in the White House. God help Hillary if that VP is Sebelius or Napolitano.
Hillary should retire gracefully and go back to the Senate and become a force in the Senate like Ted Kennedy or Al D’Amato. 2004 was her best chance to take the White House. She could have defeated Bush in 2004. But unfortunately, her time has come and gone.
Posted by: Dave from NY | May 19, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Hillary and Mccain are the only true americans in this race.
Posted by: andrea | May 19, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Hillary said it, I believe it. Amen.
Posted by: All Hail the Great Leader | May 19, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Oh please, cut the $10 a gallon gas crap.
A) You Democrats took over the majority position in part due to high gas prices in 06. You promised to fix this. You haven’t done a thing about is since. Where are the fruits of your big plans and words? Where are these big initiatives? Oh, I see….drive a hybrid and leave my a/c off in the summer.
B) You hate being involved in the Middle East. You hate drilling in this country. You hate nuclear. Pick-one you jerks, those are the choices for now. You can’t merely conserve your way out of this in a growing economy. We’ve reduced consumption in the last four months…to no avail.
$10 gas is what we get for letting our energy policy be dictated to us by a bunch of worthless Sociology majors, with ample time on their hands at the local coffee house. Shade grown, fair trade, mind you. The real world is tough and doesn’t operate by metro-sexual rules. If you want inexpensive energy then let’s start producing and refining.
Oh yeah, wasn’t $4 a gallon gas one of the tenants of environmental stewardship offered up by Al Gore in his Earth in the Balance book?
Yes we can? Can?.. What? Hope…for what? You sound like a bunch of brainwashed Lemmings. Grow up and nominate a candidate with some experience. Obama may well be elected, but God help us, we’ve never had anyone so hopelessly ill-prepared for the job.
Posted by: Dave | May 19, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Hillary Clinton cannot even run a simple campaign. She’s squandered $30 million in contributions, and the only thing she has to show for it is a failed campaign. No thinking person can believe she has what it takes to run a country when she cannot even run a successful campaign.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
To all of you Rush Limbaugh, Operation Chaos supporters pretending to be Clinton supporters, give it a break. Everyone knows what you’re up to. Democrats are not going to vote for McCain, regardless of how much McCain needs millions of additional votes to win. Obama will be the nominee, and he will trounce McCain in the general. The American people see the light.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Hillary Clinton failed miserably at reforming health care when she was First Lady. That was her only responsibility while First Lady, and she failed inside of a year. She can’t even manage the $30 million in contributions she’s gotten. Her campaign is a complete failure. She doesn’t even have the ability to beat out a junior Senator from Illinois? We’re 5 months into this campaign and she’s at such a severe delegate deficit that simple mathematics says she has no chance at the nomination. How can she be expected to run an entire country? Give me a break!
Obama has managed his campaign contributions expertly, and has run a well thought out, national campaign. Obama organized votes from all walks of life and all states, instead of just focusing on the three delegate rich states like Clinton did. Her lazy campaign is OVER. Obama ’08.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Reading ‘until we have a nominee’ can only think, the Clintons parse words so well. Since Superdelegates don’t actually vote until the convention, their verbal commitment to BHO mean absolutely nothing to her. Don’t be deceived by her seemingly to acquiesce sometime up to Denver. For better or worse, it will go to the convention. Republicans likely won’t throw anything really heavy at BHO until then either. Why weaken him and give Democrats a last chance at buyer’s remorse.
Posted by: Read Way too Much | May 19, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Warren Buffett, the greatest investor of all time, endorsed Obama today. Thank you Warren! Your wisdom and intellect has shown through again. Obama ’08.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Does anyone not think Clinton is not an arrogant elitist,she thought she was entitled to the presidency,what is that if not elitist?As far ar Michell Obama and leaving her out of the mud slinging,she has not done any mudslinging,but Bill Clinton has which makes him open for the same attacks he gives out.If Mr Clinton had just campaigned for his wife and not played the race card he would not be fair game.Howard Dean did not take the votes away from Mi and FL. their Governors did by deciding to have early primaries.I am sure that both states will have their delaghates seated at the convention.I notice that a lot of posters blame Senator Obama for the delegates not being seated at this time but it is also senator Clinton who would not agree to a fair seating of the delegates.They both have to agree so it is not just one it is both!!!!!
Posted by: bernie | May 19, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Her health care plan failed? For one that health care plan was done under Ted Kennedy you know greater Obama man. first lady can’t really do much. The ideas and blue prints were hers. the republican senate or house whatever wouldn’t pass it. kind of like how the dem’s have sent Bush Iraq defunding crap that he vetos over and over. The SCHIP bill which Hillary did help pass that insured 15 mil children was up for revote last year and Bush turned that down like 4 times because the dem’s asked for more money…you know rising health care prices and the fact that there are more kids now. I think he finally signed it back into law. ?
Posted by: Health Care | May 19, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Obama give good speeches that some body else wrote.In debates he just stemmers and mumbles, and he is too green and inexperienced to be the president of the USA.
Posted by: Moe | May 19, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
I’ve been a Georgia yellow-dog Democrat all my life, but I won’t vote for anybody who revered a racist fanatic such as Rev. Wright. It’s Hillary or McCain. Obama is a lightweight who’s not ready for primetime.
Posted by: John Randall Smith | May 19, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
I think because both candidates had ads on in FL a couple of weeks before the primary….it should stick. If they wand to re-do MI….do it. We all know enough about BO now that I am sure he will lose there again…which he knows too, and is why he made it so difficult to re-do in the first place. This must be settled May 31, and I’m guessing however it’s settled…it will benefit BO and not Hillary. This nomination has been brokered from the beginning.
Posted by: Debra | May 19, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Eric…Hillary didn’t have 5 billionaire liberals “bundling” money into her campaign…..as well as all that money he’s making from his black supporters and college kids, cause they’re loaded.
Posted by: Debra | May 19, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Obama is just tired of democracy. What an amazingly immature person. He seems to be asking—Why should the people get to vote? Why shouldn’t I win NOW?!! Why would we want such an inexperienced person in the White House? Even George Bush had more experience!
Democracy takes time—even when you don’t want it to—why would the Dems nominate another inexperienced liberal at this critical time? My first vote was for McGovern–he and every other progressive candidate has lost at the national level.
I have to make one comment—I understand enthusiasm, but the Obama supporters are absolutely the most rude, uncivil, and totally offensive people I have met in a very long time in politics. I include the right wing wacko Republicans. I guess Obama just represents one more step down in this amazingly debasing political process.
Posted by: dpmd | May 19, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
You people who point out that hillary is winning the staes with the big electoral numbers are missing the point, she is getting democratic votes (vs the general population which include democrats and independants) only in the majority of these states, her argument just isn’t factual, it is indeed irrelevant.
Posted by: raw | May 19, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
If after tomorrow when Obama will have won the majority of pledged delegates the super delegates do not end this thing then they are asking for trouble. Hillary is trying to convince her supporters that she will have the most popular votes but uses some of the funniest math you can imagine. What isn’t funny is that she is trying to divide the party for one of two reasons. One she really does believe she has a chance and number two she wants Obama to be damaged so that he will lose in November and she will try again in 2012. I believe the super delegates will continue to do the right thing after tomorrow and that is move more towards Obama and unite the party
Posted by: Paul | May 19, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
You Hillary supporters who keep saying let the people vote are the ones who want to ignore the people who already have voted. Hillary doesn’t want to count the votes in the caucus states, but she wants the Michigan and Florida votes to count now, but before their primary she signed a document agreeing they wouldn’t count. Obama is not afraid to have the rest of the primary states vote, but Hillary should honor the results and stop trying to steal the election and divide the party. If she really cared about the party she would get behind the nominee and stop trying to damage Obama for her own selfish reasons.
Posted by: Paul | May 19, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Questions for Obama supporters:
1. If Michigan and Florida broke the rules, why do both Obama and Howard Dean say that their delegations will be seated at the convention?
2. Why does Obama think that the delegates should be split 50/50 instead of honoring the actual will of the voters of Michigan and Florida?
3. Why has the Obama campaign fought to have his supporters elected as “unpledged” delegates in Michigan, if those delegates aren’t going to be seated?
4. Why did the Obama campaign put up a slate of delegates in Florida if those delegates aren’t going to be seated?
5. Why did Obama say that superdelegates shouldn’t decide the nomination and is trying to roll over the superdelegates so they he can get the nomination before all the votes in all of the primaries have been counted?
6. Do you really think that the DNC is going to tell Michigan and Florida on May 31, “sorry, but we don’t need you folks in the Democratic party. So go home and cancel your plane reservations to Denver.”
7. Is hell going to freeze over in November this year, because that’s the only way that Barack Obama will get elected President.
Posted by: scdemocrat | May 19, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
if obama makes the case that he has 2025 delegates and therefore has ‘won’, he has lost.
that number excludes florida and michigan completely. i, for one, would be willing to vote for any democratic nominee if all 50 states are included in the delegate count. that number is 2210.
the passion on the part of hillary supporters is not just that she is the superior candidate and that she has a better chance against mccain…it is the passion against basic unfairness.
i would be willing to overlook the inherent undemocratic nature of caucuses(nebraska caucus had obama up 3-1 and the primary had him winning 51-49) but i cannot, ever, overlook a party deciding a nominee from 48 states.
Posted by: Jillie | May 19, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Very entertaining this claim that the Clinton camp wants to count all the votes.
By their math the vote in Michigan where only Clinton, Kucinich and Dodd were on the ballot should count. The Florida vote should count.
But we should forget about the caucus vote states because they don’t like the votes in those states.
Hearty guffaws, your bias is pretty obvious to be only concerned with getting Clinton what she wants….
Posted by: mcgreen | May 19, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Hillary Clinton is acting like an
old vaudeville performer who refuses
to get off the stage!
It’s time to give her the Hook!
Bye Bye Hillary and take Bill with you!
Posted by: reaganfan | May 20, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
snowandrain…yeah…Obama won all those states BEFORE REV. WRIGHT AND BITTERGATE!! I have heard from many that if they could re-vote now they would not vote BO.
Posted by: Debra | May 20, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Way to go Hillary :).
She is leading in the popular vote. Obama campaign is scared that if they wait until June 3, they will be much behind in the popular votes and then the question we should ask is:
Does the popular vote count more than artificial delegate lead generated by a badly designed caucus system in the republican states?
The answer would be: The popular vote will prevail as none of the candidates will reach the number of pledged delegates.
Hillary rise :)
Posted by: Meg | May 20, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
There are some people who admire Hillary for not quitting, but I think it is more admirable to know when you are beat and move on. Our current president’s unwillingness to admit a strategy is failed and try something different have left us in very poor position on a number of fonts.
Frankly, all other issues aside, it scares me that Hillary Clinton is willing to put her campaign $20M in debt pursing a nomination she effectively has no chance of winning. This isn’t the person I want managing our country.
Posted by: Nick | May 20, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
It isn’t over. Obama will reach no delegate milestone on Tuesday or anytime soon. But how like Obama supporters to just lap it all up without checking the facts! Just like they never check the facts on Obama. The man is NOT new. He does have a history and it is pathetic and deplorable. He says what you want to hear, but if you look at his record, you’ll see he’s fooling you. And his arrogant presumtiousness (which has been there at every primary, by the way) is only going to further alienate Clinton and swing voters further. Hillary is ahead in the popular vote, and her popular lead will continue to grow. If the press and the DNC continue playing this game, and encouraging it, and Obama is falsely handed the nomination in this way, you can be sure the general election will go to McCain.
Obama has NOT won the states he needs to to win the GE. He’ll deserately need every vote – including Florida and Michigan. Which I understand he plans to disenfranchise in the primary then ask them to vote for him in the Fall? What a moron.
Posted by: Torch | May 20, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Hillary is ahead in the popular vote. She’s wond the battleground states necessary to win against McCain in the Fall. Her experience, knowledge and intelligence if far greater than Obama’s. She’s a lot tougher too, and doesn’t whine when the press takes a jab at Bill. And unlike Obama, Hillary knows we have 50 states (apparently Obama thinks we have 60 but he isn’t quite sure).
This is NOT over. And the arrogant presumptiousness of the press and little boy Obama who is just so tired and grumpy about this whole DEMOCRATIC PROCESS and just wants to make it all go away by speaking the ‘magic words’, is only going to alienate and outrage Clinton and swing voters more.
Obama doesn’t stand a chance in the fall against McCain, especially now.
Go Hillary! We’re behind you 150%!
Posted by: Torch | May 20, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
I am wondering why if Hillary and her supporters think that caucus votes are illegitimate, why they didn’t speak up before the primaries started. That would have been the time to argue your case. Not after most of them had taken place. That tends to make it look like sore losers. If in fact the only way to count votes is by popular vote and not electoral, then why wasn’t there pressure put on the party years ago to change it? Why just now? If Hillary were in the lead by delegate votes, we would hear nothing but how democratic the system is. And I think that Obama would graciously accept that she was the winner and back her. Why can’t she do the same?
Posted by: jlw | May 20, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
I will tell you what REALITY is!! Obama is a MAN!! That is why he will win the nomination; the good-old-boy’s network. But he will NOT win my homestate of Ohio & he will not win FL. and he will not win the election. Too many people like me see him for what he and his wife are. Arrognant people who think they are owed something. I will NEVER vote for him. But I am not staying home, either. I will vote for McCain. And I urge ALL Women to do the same thing. It is time we showed these good-old-boys what power women have in this wonderful country that I am PROUD of everyday, Michelle Obama!!!!!
Posted by: Bobbie | May 20, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am
I continue to be surprised that Hillary argues she is electable. The word “more” has nothing to do with it. The youth vote that Obama brings to the table, has not heard of the scandal disaster of the Bill Clinton presidency. The repubs will bring up all of the people who were indicted – more than any other presidency. Look at the pardon list with felons and terrorists – clearly linkable to money for the Clinton library and votes for Hillary. Not electable.
Posted by: disambiguates | May 20, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am
It is going to take Obama losing the GE to help the leftist to understand what he has done to the party. He has so alienated the moderates (along with his supporters) in the party that even just losing a small portion of their votes in the GE will be enough to swing a state.
States like Oh, Pa, WV and Fla are so close to swinging one way or the other, Obama needs every vote he can get. As the GE gets closer Obama needs to do something to unite the party and just getting Hillary to ask her supporters to vote for him won’t do it.
Message to you leftist radicals: Your youthful inexperience in politics will be evident come the GE.
Posted by: Average Joe | May 20, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am
I’m not so much apposed to Obama, or so much for Hilary. I am definitely against McCain and the Republican agenda that will promote prolongation of the war in Iraq, and may well get us into a new war with Iran. I also believe Obama and Hilary are more likely to address Health care and free trade in a way that will benefit the middle class, while McCain is more likely to push an economic agenda that will continue to benefit the wealthy at the expense of the middle class. I am a “Conservative”. I’m not in favor or wealth redistribution from rich to poor. However, when the wealthy can undercut the value of the labors of the middle class worker, by shipping industrial jobs off shore, or by hiring illegal workers we end up with wealth redistribution from the poor to the rich. What we need is economic reforms that will protect the lower and middle class workers (of the world) from exploitation by their employers and the wealthy. I am not a racist either; I believe in Martin Luther Kings “I have a dream speech”. I want a world where a person is not judged (for better or worse) based on the color of their skin (or sex) but rather on the content of their character. As such I see all three of these candidates as people of good “Character”, and as such all three are deserving of our respect. But Character is not everything, “message” and “political philosophy” is very important as well. I “personally” disqualify McCain because he offers the wrong “message” and “political philosophy” for what is wrong in America and the world today. He might have been the right man eight years ago following Bill Clinton, but after eight years of GWB we need a president with a totally different approach to foreign and domestic affairs. I do not fear Obama’s willingness to “talk” to our enemies, but he must be very careful in what he says and offers them as concessions for peace. My greatest fear is that he will offer them a “good deal” in exchange for “Peace” only to have them break the deal at which point he would declare “All out war”. I fear “trusting” those who cannot be “trusted” is more likely to result in war, than simply staring them down. As for Hilary, yes she has “personal negatives”, but so do the other two. Rightly or wrongly Obama is being labeled a “liberal” which puts him at the far left of political “central”. Hilary is being cast as a “Centrist” while McCain is seen as a “liberal-Conservative” which places him just right of center. Obama is in a strong position to wine the liberal dominated Democratic Party nomination. However, the country is predominately “centrist” as is indicated by “Regan Democrats” and “Bill Clinton Republicans”. In other words, the vast majority of the American electorate is neither truly Republican or Democrat or Ultra-Conservative or Ultra Liberal. Looking forward into the general election I see clearly that the Republicans will do all they can to label Obama as an “Ultra-Liberal”. If they succeed, and they probably will, McCain will win. If Obama can establish himself as a “moderate liberal” and champion of “clean politics” then he “might” win, but only if his “black” followers do not cause a backlash in the white population with their “Black on white counter racism”. In other words, the black communities behavior toward whites, will affect the white communities perception of Obama, and as such determine his acceptability as a candidate in the eyes of many white voters. That is another angle the Republicans will try to exploit against Obama. But lets just assume neither Obama nor Clinton get enough “electoral delegates”. Should the nomination process end on the basis of “pledged Super Delegates”? I say absolutely not! The legislative process often requires a president to “persuade” senators and House members to change their “opinions” on a bill prior to casting their votes. That process of “getting the votes” is a very important part of the legislative process and can make the difference between an “ ineffective lame Duck Presidency”, and a “presidency that delivers Change”. In short, while the “pledges” of super-delegates are indicative of a problem for Hilary, it by no means knocks her out of the race. After the last electoral delegates are counted, then Clinton can start the hard “political” work of getting Obama’s “pledged super delegates” to change their pledge to her. Therefore, this race cannot, and should not end, until the super-delegates actually cast their votes in the Democratic national Convention.
Posted by: tom | May 20, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
It’s kinda near over.
Posted by: CC | May 20, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Here’s the way I see it: Obama is NOT the best candidate of the 3. It’s that simple. He has not proven anything except that he has no real answers, only that he is for some kind of undefined change. I think that 4 more years of a Republican prez would be better than taking a chance on someone who has not proven he gives a dam for America, who is more likely in truth to hate America. There is more evidence that he hates America than he loves America. I believe that the support for HRC among Americans other than superdelegates is greater than BO’s supporters suspect. It is a VERY close nomination race. I am going to write in HRC, I wish all those who believe in her would do the same instead of voting McCain, to me that is the best solution. It is more about who is the best to lead the country rather than party politics, look where party politics have gotten us – really nowhere. That’s why I do not and have never been affiliated with any party. Those like me are stronger than you think. Dems and Reps – that’s where the divisiveness comes from, not the candidates. No one is breaking your arms to make you be a member of any party, so if you don’t like that BO is being rammed down your throat, resign from the dem party and vote your personal belief. If HRC is the candidate you want, check your local rules and write in her name. I wish there were no political parties, they have obviously not chosen well in terms of who “they” are running. We are allowing the party system to tear the country apart. That’s my opinion. It’s got nothing to do with race, and everything to do with what I believe to be right for America.
Posted by: Wendy4Decency | May 20, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Wendy4Decency>>>I hope if Hilary losses the nomination, that she and bill, and Al Gore, and many of her other Moderate Democrat and Republican supporters abandon their respective parties to help in the establishment of a totally new political party dedicated to “centrist” ideology and grass rots political fund raising. I could see Joe I could also see them taking a lesion from the Ron Paul fundraising success to reconnect with “we the people” Lieberman as Hillarie’s running mate in the new party.
Posted by: nh pragmatist | May 20, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
If Hillary doesn’t get the nomination I’m voting for McCain.
Posted by: Jack E | May 20, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
HRC… reality check: For you, it’s over. It was over the moment that Democrats found a more-electable candidate. Time to admit defeat.
Posted by: Great Caesar's Ghost | May 20, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
If Hillary is cheated out of the nomination, then McBush will be the winner by a landslide. I will never vote for an affirmative action nominee !!!!!
Posted by: Abe | May 20, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
@Abe,
You are correct, Hillary has more votes than Obama. I guess, votes do not count in the democratic party. I’m sticking with the republicans, no affirmative action.
Posted by: Art | May 20, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
I guess Hillary knows how AL Gore feels, cheated. The democrats are going with a loser. Go McCain.
Posted by: cindy | May 20, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
The convention will be in August for the democratic party. Maybe, the unRev. Wright will drop another bomb on Obama. Go Hillary, the people’s choice.
Posted by: Les | May 20, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Dear Fellow Democrats. Regardless of who the Democratic nominee will be, WE MUST UNITE. The next president will make very important choices. Obama and Hillary are inches apart; but they are both miles apart from McCain. THE NEXT PRESIDENT COULD APPOINT AS MANY AS THREE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES. These are appointments for LIFE, and they will radically affect us. The Supreme Court is who has given us women rights and who has given Blacks rights (as well as allowing us freedom of choice and basic civil rights). If you do not believe me, find out for yourself what these new appointments will mean to you. Please do not get mad if your candidate does not win. Instead, think. Think about what your vote will mean to you, your children, each other, and the planet. VOTE DEMOCRATIC. We cannot withstand another four years with McBush!
Posted by: Marilyn | May 20, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Wendy4Decency>>>>In answer to what you wrote, yes, I see the wind is shifting. Listen to statements such as “If the Democratic party is going to be the party of California Eletists and egg heads then that is a party you can count me out of” <<< A clinton opperative, Also look at what happened to Leiberman in Conneticut last election cycle, it was exactly the same thing, the "people wanted Leiberman" but the Democratic party pushed him out in favor of an ultra-liberal, Leiberman declared as an independant then won the general election in a three way race. I think Hilary and Bill are going to run this right up to the Convention, then if they do not get the Nomination they will walk out with all of there followers…exactly as Lincoln did when he founded the Republican Party!!
Posted by: nh pragmatist | May 20, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Christina……I’m doing just the opposite. I’m encouraging as many voters as possible to write the DNC to have the votes of Michigan and Florida counted. Letting them now that if they dis-enfranchise over 2 million votes then get prepared for an over flow of defectors leaving the Democratic Party. I voted Democrat in this election, but after seeing how one campaign (an you know who) wants to see the votes thrown out. I’m registering as an Independent. The DNC has taken my vote for granted for the final time.
Posted by: Justin | May 20, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
It’s amazing how many Obama supporters believe he is a shoe-in for the General Election. Boy, are you some of you going to be upset when they hand McCain the presidency. Then all Barack’s supporters are really going to cry racism then even the white ones.
Posted by: Sherry | May 20, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
I am asolutely certain that sensible Americans of every race and shade of colour will not elect a junior senator with no experience to run our country at these troubles times. Most African Americans (except Michelle) cherish and love this country, and are worried about their future… They also know what the Clintons stand for, because they forever defended them and fought for all Americans to have a better life. Hillary Clinton has the vision, the policies and the strength to take us forward. And sensible people know that, and won’t sabotage their own future.
Posted by: Retrovvision | May 20, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
It’s Over! Bye Bye Hillary and take
Bill with you!
Posted by: reaganfan | May 21, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Hillary should take her battle all the way to the convention. Obama is a weak, unproven candidate who is not even particularly knowledgeable, never mind experienced. Hillary Clinton has done nothing wrong by continuing her campaign, she has a right to do so and, apparently, she is paying for it.
Posted by: Brett Pedersen | June 2, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm