Democratic Leaders Pushing to Avoid Convention Fight
ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf reports: The Democratic Party’s rules and bylaws committee doesn’t meet until this weekend to decide the fate of the Michigan and Florida delegations and the final Democratic primaries don’t conclude until next week, but Democratic heavyweights are already talking about how to push the undeclared superdelegates who will pick the Democratic nominee into someone’s corner.
Uncommitted superdelegate and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., visiting San Francisco, told KGO Radio today that he spoke this morning with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and last night to DNC Chairman Howard Dean. "We agree there won’t be a fight at the convention," he said, later adding that "simple math indicates" Barack Obama is likely to become the Democratic nominee.
In April, Reid had suggested that he, Pelosi and Dean would convene after the last Democratic primary and decide on a course of action to make superdelegates take sides long before the convention. Today, he told KGO Radio’s Ronn Owens of the superdelegates, "They’ve already made their decision. That’s why we’re going to make a decision next week. It’s the same group of people. No one else is going to be involved. So they either make the decision now or they make it in August. I believe they should make it now rather than in August."
In an interview with KGO after his radio appearance, Reid said, "The time has come to make a decision. I think we need a general election that’s 5 months. I don’t think August is enough time."
He suggested the Democratic primary "will be ended a couple days after June 3rd."
"This is down now to the superdelegates. And probably, simple math indicates that, next Tuesday, after we get the results from Puerto Rico on Sunday and South Dakota and Montana on Tuesday, Obama will probably have the necessary number at that time anyway," he said.

Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Obama will lock in the nomination of week from June 3 with the delegates of MI and FL counted. (Period)
Posted by: Vanessa | May 29, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
So pick the least best candidate and be done with it. Do not let Florida vote! Do not let the American public choose. Do away with the democratic way and do not hear its citizens. You candidate has “BO”, tied to corruption, tied to a radical church and its beliefs, flip flops daily, has little experience and will cause the biggest racial divide in history in the US—oh yes, select the black man NOT because he is the best candidate but because he is black. I have a suggestion. I know many black men that are well educated, and would be much better suited for this job and I would be willing to vote for any of them instead of OBAMA. It is not that OBAMA is black it is that OBAMA is tainted because of his background. You will never be able to sell him to the American public. The Democrats will loose.
Posted by: Anne | May 29, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Is this democracy in action? Why don’t they just ordain him now, since that’s who the DNC wants. Why continue with the charade of letting the voters decide?
Posted by: Belle | May 29, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Anna they ARE picking the BEST candidate her dirty laundry would be part of this election and she would never beat Mc Cain in fact the rep wanted her she was easier to beat ….I know trhat is hard for you to understand but true.Stop your crying and get on with this election.You are a racist too huh???? What the hey difference does the color of your skin meanyour gender meanall this is an excuse forall the stupid people to CRY andsay as HILLY does. She lost and did it herself geeeeeeeeee.All by herself .
Posted by: Honest | May 29, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
OBAMA CONGRATULATIONS, BOTH BLACK AND WHITE GAVE YOU THE ENOUGH DELEGATES TO CLINCH TO THE NOMIANTION.
OBAMA 08, 12
Posted by: angie | May 29, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
also how do you argue against a war you voted for?
Posted by: bhrandon | May 29, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Well I can see they think just because they try to push the super delegates to make a decision that they will just go along like robots and do as they are told. I thought these were to be independent thinkers. If they line up behind Obama and force this issue without letting things go to the convention then the democrats will lose in November and they should.
Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 29, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Bill will not allow anyone other than a Clinton to become a Democratic Party president. His legacy is on the line.
Bill and Hillary will scream and destroy the party is Hillary is not the candidate.
Bill has repeatedly said he is the “greatest Democrat president ever”.
Posted by: Debbie | May 29, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
SEAT ALL THE DELEGATES AND COUNT ALL THE VOTES.ITS THE AMERICAN WAY.
Posted by: brigitte | May 29, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
thats right hillary count all the votes!
Posted by: bhrandon | May 29, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
I blew nothing out of proportion. Hillary has every right (like Ted Kennedy did when he was down 795 delegates) to take her fight to the convention in a race this close. I hope she does.
Of course this article, like all the other ones, will just be another way for Hillary bashers to get their digs in.
Posted by: belle | May 29, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Reid, Pelosi and Dean making the decision for millions? Huh, that’s weird.
Posted by: Lucy | May 29, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Why are we fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan to instill democracy when the DNC won’t even honor DEMOCRACY here by counting FL and MI votes?? HYPOCRITES!! Never thought the day would come where Republicans would be considered more DEMOCRATIC than the DNC.
Posted by: James | May 29, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
First black president?
WHITE + BLACK = BLACK or this?:
MULATTO: Is a person of mixed black and white ancestry or the offspring of one white parent and one black parent or someone 50% black and 50% white.
Posted by: idiotus | May 29, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
belle,
yes, she has the “right”. But is it right? The people don’t think she is stronger, the Super Delegates don’t think she is stronger.
She has an airplane hangar full of baggage named Bill Clinton. The GOP will crush her.
She is unelectable. Appointable, yes.
Posted by: jmc663 | May 29, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
The deal is to SPIN it so that Michigan and Florida have some delegates, but cannot hurt the beloved Obama or help Clinton in any way.
Sooner or later the republican media is going to be all over the truth of what has happened here .
The party insiders chose the nominee regardless if he is the weaker candidate.
Obama is going to have to spend the summer and fall not only fighting Mc
Cain and the republicans, but fight the republican 527s who will forever try to fan the anger of the Clinton supporters.
The guy will have to continually fight to keep the Clintons supporters from defecting
Posted by: sandra | May 29, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
The whole point is to vote and who ever gets to the end with the most delegates wins.
Obama has the most delegates and Clinton can’t pass him with the ones remaining.
So Obama will be our candidate.
And speaking of polls and electablity in the fall:
Pew Research released today:
Obama 47, McCain 44
Dates conducted: May 21-25
Posted by: Lynne | May 29, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean need to stop pushing Obama as the nominee. No one made Kennedy quit prior to the convention. Who the h*** do they think they are. Why did everyone have to go thru all of this madness if they have the power to push Hillary out. Jealousy. Can’t stand it. I hope I have the chance to see her & him out of office next election. I don’t know what Obama has on them but it must be good. Both look like jerks. If you push her out McCain will win. I will get out myself door to door campaigning for John McCain. “I will step in.” Jerks!!!!
Posted by: C Good | May 29, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Listen up people, this is not the General Election!!! The fact that FL and MI won’t count is NOT NOT NOT unconstitutional… this is the Democratic parties’ process of picking their parties’ nominee for the REAL election. Judges have already found this a non-issue, the party didn’t do anything wrong in enforcing their rules. People should be upset at their state’s government for breaking the Democratic party rules and thinking they could get away with it!!! They are the idiots. Hillary agreed to the fact that they wouldn’t count and now that she needs them she is complaining!
Posted by: matt | May 29, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Maybe part of the problem with Pelosi, Dean and Reid is that they ARE afraid of a fight, ANY kind of a fight. It’s easy to pick on the Clintons when Pelosi and crew have most of the Dems siding with Obama now, but then the Democrats seem to be very proficient at backstabbing each other. They have accomplished absolutely nothing with a majority in Congress over the past 2 years. For all of their complaining, they are the ones who didn’t want to talk impeachment of President Bush, and now they are crying about avoiding a convention fight. Maybe that is exactly what we need to get some of these politicans off of their behinds and getting something done other than just releasing election year hot air. They all make me sick, and I think Hillary Clinton should run as an independent after the way she has been treated this year by the press as well as her own party. If Obama gets elected, let’s see how much “change” he actually has accomplished a year from November. He won’t be able to claim he has no support then as most of the Washington insiders seem to be supporting him now. I’m sure his supporters will blame that on the Clinton’s too.
Posted by: dwc | May 29, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
By now you would think they would know better. Pelosi can’t push the superdeligates around and she can’t push Hillary out. Didn’t Dean insist the superdeligates would come out early to settle this? And didn’t Pelosi attempt to tell the superdeligates who to vote for already, and then she came out later to correct her own words. History repeats it self. Most of the superdeligates left are supporting Hillary. The media and Pelosi can’t take that away. Hillary knows it and they know it too.
Posted by: Sean | May 29, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
I remember when Ted Kennedy was running for pres., his campaign had people all over the city of Chicago. I came home from work and a man practically accosted me, telling me to vote for Kennedy. Then, when it came time to vote, this man was standing outside of the polling place telling everyone to vote for Kennedy. The police didn’t even chase him away. If it’s alright for Kennedy, then it’s all right for Hillary. I hope it isn’t too late when they finally find out all the horrible things about Mr. BO and there are alot yet to come. Why, he wouldn’t even have become a senator if he hadn’t run against a republican from Maryland. And Rezko’s money helped him.
Posted by: suze | May 29, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Democrat Party flips the finger to its own voters and double fingers the Florida and Michigan voters….
Posted by: fred | May 29, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Clinton Campaign, Surrogates, DNC April 1992: Screw the remaining states, the race is over
by John Aravosis (DC) · 5/27/2008 05:59:00 PM ET · Link
Discuss this post here: 29 Comments · reddit · FARK · Digg It!
And don’t forget that back in 1992, they had FAR more states that hadn’t voted since the primaries started in March, as compared to January this year. Jed has a lot more quotes, but these are the best:
“It’s mathematically impossible for Brown to get the nomination.”
– Clinton spokesman George Stephanopoulos on Clinton’s last foe (NYT, 4/8/92)
“It’s time to close ranks. We cannot wait until July when we already know who has earned the right to be our nominee and who will be our nominee.”
– West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller (NYT, 4/11/92)
“I cannot imagine a set of circumstances that would keep Bill Clinton from having a majority of the delegates by the end of the primary season.”
– Democratic Party Chairman Ronald H. Brown (NYT, 4/29/92)
“Mr. Brown added that he had long hoped for an early nominee ‘so we can focus our time and attention on George Bush.’”
– NYT, 4/29/92
So when Bill Clinton said the other day that never has a candidate been treated so disrespectfully, he lied. Surprise.
Labels: bill clinton, hillary clinton
Posted by: Lynne | May 29, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
I knew I was a Republican most of my life for some reason. Democratic LEADERS are absolutely the stupidist bunch of COLLEGE EDUCATED jerks I’ve ever had the displeasure of being a part of. If Hillary isn’t given a fair chance at the nomination I will vote Republican once again and won’t look back. Anyone says see what you did I’ll say yeah but it’s Nancy & Howards’ fault.
Posted by: C Good | May 29, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Put Hillary on the ticket, and you avoid a fight.
Posted by: How about this? | May 29, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
I knew I was a Republican most of my life for some reason. Democratic LEADERS are absolutely the stupidist bunch of COLLEGE EDUCATED jerks I’ve ever had the displeasure of being a part of. If Hillary isn’t given a fair chance at the nomination I will vote Republican once again and won’t look back. Anyone says see what you did I’ll say yeah but it’s Nancy & Howards’ fault.
Posted by: C Good | May 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
So the DNC is looking to shut us up and shut us down…we will be leaving the party, taking our money, our support and our VOTES!
We will never vote for BO Barry, NEVER!The McCain campaign will be glad to have us dance at Johns inauguration.
Posted by: HP Boston | May 29, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
This has more to do with Clinton trying to manipulate the system and upsetting the apple cart than with anything else. Hillary doesn’t care what happens to her party.
Posted by: Gwen | May 29, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
I read on one of the other blogs that Hillary will run as a third party if not given DNC approval. I am probably getting it wrong but I would like to know if anyone has heard this.It might be time for a good third party canidate
Posted by: bear | May 29, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
That s just like the Demorcrats have someone like Nancy Pelosi pick the nominee .She couldn’t even run congress the last two years .She has accomplished less than any speaker in the history of the US Congress .She is a looser .They need to give her the boot!
Posted by: Ted from Florida | May 29, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“We agree there won’t be a fight at the convention”. You ain’t calling the shots, Harry, and neither is Nancy girl. Ten bucks say it’s worse than that, Harry boy.
Posted by: jggrimm | May 29, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Edwin, if you do some research you’ll see that the “Chicago Politics” they are talking about is that he had the names checked on petitions. Turns out thousands of the “signatures” were TYPED in, not signatures at all. Those had to be removed.
Chicago politics are the people who type names on petitions. He fought against them.
Posted by: Lynne | May 29, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
The title of this news item should have been : “Democratic leaders pushing Hillary out and along with her 20 million of her supporters”.
The text of the article should have said: “Harry the clueless Reid, and Nancy Paleo-Losi are absolutely committed to ensure a McCain landslide in November by supporting Obomination”.
Posted by: long-term democrat | May 29, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
HP Boston – you’d be a super republican!! =-) Happy Trails!!
Posted by: Lynne | May 29, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Pelosi needs to go back where she came from. The Dems have just lost a lot of voters. Good Luck you guys your going to need it. Go McCain.
Posted by: Barb | May 29, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Anne,
I promise you… Even if another educated black man were running, there would be an issue with him as well.
Let’s just keep it real.
Posted by: Tori | May 29, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
long-term democrat – maybe her 20 million supporters could pay a dollar a piece to bail Hillary’s campaign out of debt!!! They still owe my hometown $55 million for their “visits”
here.
Posted by: Lynne | May 29, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
The guy will have to continually fight to keep the Clintons supporters from defecting
Posted by: sandra | May 29, 2008 3:12:09 PM
————
TOO LATE!!
Posted by: HP Boston | May 29, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Why didn’t the DNC let Florida and Michigan do a revote when there wre many prominent Dems who was willing to raise the money .Howard Dean is a idiot .And every vote needs to count .Just because the Demorcrat party of those states didn’t follow the rules why hurt the voters .The last I look on a map Florida and Michigan was in the United States .LET THE PEOPLE VOTE !!!
Posted by: Tim | May 29, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
so two “heavyweights”, senator spineless reid and congresswoman inept pelosi…wow!
Posted by: newsman | May 29, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
So…now the DNC is being told what to do by Reid and Pelosi and the heck with millions of voters? Is it hard to see why I must change my party affiliation to Independent and vote for McCain after 40 yrs of faithful voting for democrats? I can not remember being this angry about being made powerless by fellow democrats. I just can’t do it anymore…you folks have finally gone too far.
Posted by: Syl | May 29, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Tim – Let ALL the people vote!!! What about the people in Michigan who heard the vote didn’t count and stayed home. Or about the people in Michigan who went to vote and Obama’s name isn’t on the ballot?? What about the people in Florida who stayed home because all the candidates and the DNC said the presidential vote wouldn’t count?
Count ALL the votes!! Right now we don’t even HAVE all the votes!!
Posted by: Lynne | May 29, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Obama will be the nominee, but he will never be the president.
Hope being the nominee is enough to satisfy you guys!
Posted by: Jo | May 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I’m disgusted to be associated with a Democrat. How is this democratic?
Hillary or McCain. Obama is an inexperienced dweeb with an America-hating preacher and wife. NOBAMA!!!
Posted by: MSG | May 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
You Hillary supporters really need to stop throwing temper tantrums. It’s embarrassing and she’s embarrassing too. Half the country supports Obama so don’t say that Obama is being pushed on us. And Hillary will never run as a third party. First she doesn’t have the money and she has to pay off her debt. Plus she can kiss the Clinton legacy goodbye. There is no way she would be willing to do that. If she does it just goes to show that she will do anything to win. It’s not about this country, it’s about her. I remember an interview way before super tuesday and she said she will definately be the nominee, very arrogent of her.
Posted by: Emily | May 29, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Well, I hope someone tells Hillary because it looks like she’s going on to the convention.
Posted by: Kathy | May 29, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
so it was a close race, big deal. hilary still lost according to the rules of the dnc. it is impossible for her to win. democrats finally have an opportunity to get a republican out of the white house and they want to put in the most polarizing figure in politics, hilary clinton. it is time for the party to come together and vote for the black man OBAMA!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: tgh | May 29, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Tim – The reason there wasn’t another vote is because Obama said no. Now he expects these people MI & FL to bow down to him now. Bull****!!!!!
Posted by: C Good | May 29, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
MSG,
Hilary’s not going to be Democratic nominee so it’s either Obama or the old man.
The old man is only and option if your happy with the way thing are going.
Posted by: Tori | May 29, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
20 Million Hillary supporters vs. 20 Million Obama supporters
I’m betting on the educated younger crowd.
Hillary’s type of experience resulted in a 30 million campaign debt. Hillary’s type of experience also caused her to hire inept campaign personal. She’s not the best candidate. She never was. The Clinton supporters really should wake and realize your candidate is flawed. She lost the election.
Posted by: UnitedDems08 | May 29, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
So its ok for someone to abide by the rules regarding Fl. and Mi at a time when they felt sure the nomination was theirs
But once they no longer have the nomination its ok to disregard the rules and claim you are speaking for aLL the voters of those two states whose votes need to be counted.
How much would Hillary be championing the Florida voters had she lost there.
What hypocracy by the Clinton team.
They feel its perfectly correct for the candidate who followed his parties rules to be given zero votes because only Clinton’s name was on the ballot in Michigan. What won’t she do to win.
Posted by: Hal Darman | May 29, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
They’re just gonna have to ban Hillary from the building in August.
Posted by: JimmyT | May 29, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
It seems apparent to me that there has been enough squabbling and gerrymandering, however unintentional, to bring serious doubt to the Democrats’ prospects of winning the presidency this fall. Bold actions are needed. The only way I see to unify the party is to broker a deal with Obama and Clinton on the same ticket. If Obama and Clinton really care about the country, these two need to make a sincere effort together and put their differences aside for the sake of all of us. Actual compromise needs to be brought back into the political arena, not the phony Bush-esque brand that has been anything but genuine or compromise. It’s really true, “You can’t always get what you want!” You know the rest of the song goes.
Posted by: Jerome | May 29, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
democrats finally have an opportunity to get a republican out of the white house and they want to put in the most polarizing figure in politics, hilary clinton
=======================================
And a disciple of “Rev” Wright, an associate of domestic terrorist, ultra-left wing extremist Obama is a non-polarizing figure??? You might have sold this b.s in the democratic primaries succuessfully. I’ve bad news for you. It ain’t going to sell for the general election!
Posted by: long-term democrat | May 29, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
It doesn’t bother anyone that Obama played dirty politics to get into the state senate in Illinois? It is the exact opposite of what he professes to be. Watch Ac360 tonight and see if Mr. Cooper is capable of being unbiased in his reporting of this new story hitting the airwaves tonight. The SUPER D’s need to weigh this cafefully. He doesn’t have a cakewalk to the WH ahead of him. It’s closet time….what’s he hiding in there???
Posted by: Dee | May 29, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
I don’t see how they can consider counting the Michigan and Florida primaries as things stand now. I mean they TOLD everyone beforehand that they wouldn’t be allowed to seat their delegates, and both Clinton and Obama agreed on this. How many voters were “disenfranchised” because they stayed away from the polls after being told that their votes wouldn’t mean anything anyway? I am a patriotic American, and I vote in every election. It can be difficult to take time off of work to vote, and even I might sit out of an election that everyone says “won’t count”. How many voters in MI and FL chose to sit out their primaries? Can we really say that their primaries were representative of the voters’ wishes?
Posted by: Eric | May 29, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
The Democrats are once more on a death march to losing thanks to the white wine sipping, volvo driving, latte sipping wing of the party. The bulk of the the white working class may well leave the Democratic party this election as Obama goes down in flames. Anyone remember McGovern?
And to think we had the election sown up until Obama decided he had to extend his book tour.
Posted by: joe | May 29, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Incredulous! Can they be more arrogant than that? YES THEY CAN!
Just vote independent or Republican, do a write in, or stay home. Let Pelosi crash and burn under full steam. If she thinks we’ll come together after this, she’s into the cannabis again.
Posted by: len | May 29, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Obama under special investigation CNN with the rules he screwed with for his run for Senate seat in l996….TONIGHT, ON CNN ON ANDERSON COOPER, OBAMA CAMPAIGN TRIED TO STOP THIS INVESTIGATION FROM AIRING “SAYING IT IS OLD NEWS”….Thought this guy was a new kind of politics. They (BO CAMPAIGN) really tried to stop this story from airing, BUT YA ALL SHOULD KNOW BEFORE SAT, HOW OBAMA GOT VOTES IN CHICAGO…UNDERHANDED, LYING, POLITICIAN….HE’S NO CHANGE.
WATCH CNN TONIGHT AT 10:00 eastern…Anderson Cooper. This could really hurt him.
this news is so old, that is why the media is bias toward Obama. They should have aired months ago
Posted by: peter | May 29, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
The Clinton supporters really should wake and realize your candidate is flawed. She lost the election.
UnitedDems08 | May 29, 2008 3:43:02 PM
========================================
Actually Obama won because of the media, and George Soros money. Obama won not because he is a better campaigner or a better candidate but because of demographics and media. This is not going to work out for November.
Posted by: long-term democrat | May 29, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Hillary must go to the convention
and fight back against DNC,Pelosi,Reid,
etc.She MUST speak for the 17+millions
voters.
She needs to leave the party
and run as an independent.The party
leaders must be punished.
Get even Hillary.They done wrong to you.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 29, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
sure…pick the one who is almost sure to loose…the one they pick because they are too chicken to pick the one who could actually win the GE. Pick the rock star, messiah, empty suit extreme liberal…
I am sick of being a democrat….
these 2 butt munches – Pelosi and Reid are a huge dissapointment.
signed Reagan Democrat
Posted by: babs | May 29, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
I talked with someone at Hillary’s camp and was told that they cannot handle the number so calls requesting that she run as an independent. Go ahead to the convention Hillary, we are with you. Or, go independent and we will with you too.
Posted by: bobby | May 29, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
THE SAME THING GOES FOR HILLARY ONLY LEAVING HER NAME ON THE BALLOT IN MI AND WANTING TO COUNT THEIR VOTES THAT AINT DIRTY NO DIFFRENCE
Posted by: angie | May 29, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Harold Ickes, HRC campaign, could have protested the disenfranchisement in August 2007. Instead, he pushed for 100% disenfranchisement instead of just 50%. Rules are rules in this country. HRC signed off on them and now she and you want the rules changed? She was the inevitable nominee, had the most experienced staff and the most money. She blew it – had no contingency plans for after Big Tuesday and overspent. Florida and Michigan would not even have been a thought, and you really know it if you can be honest enough, until HRC needed the votes. Not a pip squeak of protest before Big Tuesday. The Constitution does not grant any of us any rights whatsoever to a primary vote or a caucus – we are a Republic. Go read up on it. Primaries and caucuses are the sole perogative of each Party. In past years, only a few States got to vote in a primary. Party insiders in other States determined the candidate of choice. One can only steal something if it already belongs to somebody. HRC did not own the nomination so trying to claim that Obama stole it is ludicrous. If HRC is the most electible how come she is not now in a position to be unbeatable? And, please do not whine to this 67 White LOL that sexism is the problem. There is a big difference between aggressive and assertive. Most women of any degree of intelligence who are, or have been in the work place know that. HRC has been aggressive in her stance, finger jabbing and statements. Downright turn off to true feminists who want a female President who has achieved on her own merits without any name recognition. Furthermore, many of her votes were from Limbaugh’s Project Chaos and switchover GOP to skew the numbers and they have admitted to it. Therefore, her ‘popular’ vote is questionable as well.
Posted by: KiwiTricia | May 29, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Obama did not win one big state in the primaries – what are the dems going to do? Are they stupid
Posted by: Kathy | May 29, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Congratulations to Senator Obama who waged an ethical and smart campaign, and treated Hillary Clinton with dignity she is unworthy of.
Sometimes good can prevail over evil, I guess!
Posted by: John Powalski | May 29, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
What in the world are they doing? The people need to be heard. Mr Obama needs to step down if anybody needs to. Has the Democratic Party lost it’s mind? It doesn’t matter what color anyone is, he is not seasoned or experienced for this job.
Posted by: Andrea Texas | May 29, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Nicholas: I agreed. This fight is now between the DNC party and Howard Dean.
Posted by: Willie | May 29, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
June 3 is on the horizon. Democrats unite!!
Posted by: Julie | May 29, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Well looks like the DEms have started comming out and showing that they are really not for a free election, pushing people to make up their mind, yeah free choice I think not.
What it looks like is they wan BO and the rest of the country wants the Hill.
Our speaks really show what they believe.
Posted by: Bob | May 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
So what if a few big wigs agree, they were Obama supporters anyway. The media is spinning us around again.
The polls solidly support Hillary as the front runner of the swing states; she also has the popular vote. We are going to the convention floor! Hillary is going to win because Obama can’t.
Posted by: sean | May 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
To DNC,PELOSI,REID and all the
superdelegates.
Meet me at the polls in november!!!
Millions like me WE WILL NOT vote
for Hussein Obama in november.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Pretending that up is down does not make it so.
Let’s not forget that Obama has WON the Democratic nomination by running a great campaign:
33 of 51 primary contests (almost twice as many)
1982 total delegates (compared to Clinton’s 1783)
That’s right – Senator Obama’s delegate lead over Hillary is now 199. We have a winner.
Posted by: John Powalski | May 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
The only people disenfranchising Michigan and Florida are the STATE LEGISLATURES. They changed the dates. If you cannot play by the rules the you suffer the consequences. Life is a b&*&^ sorry.
Posted by: JENNY | May 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Hey J.R. – Puerto Rico, Montana and S.D. haven’t voted yet. Maybe they should tune in tonight to CNN on the investigative piece camp Obama tried to stop. They say it’S old news. IT’S PERTINENT THAT HE DIDDLED WITH VOTES AND SCREWED EVERYONE OFF THE BALLOT IN CHICAGO FOR HIS SENATE SEAT. Calculating bastard.
5/29…CNN 10:00 PM Eastern Anderson Cooper’s 360…Watch it!
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
This is illegal. Superdelegates do not vote until August. A pledge is not the same as an actual vote. Circumventing democracy will be met with legal action.
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 29, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Hillary is the Best and Most Qualified to be President! It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see a railroad job! Good going DNC, nice to know you stand up for All Voters & the Democratic Way of Life! Great Example to the World to sell the Democratic Fair Way of Life ! Ha!
Posted by: Not Fooled | May 29, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Hillary’s supporters, do not spend anymore time talking to Obama’s supporters. They are doing what they need to do to support him. Our time and word need to be focus on the DNC party. It they select Obama and he wins fine but the DNC party will have to deal with us today or at the convention and after until they are no longer in office.
Posted by: Willie | May 29, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Dean, Pelosi and Reid need to keep their inept noses out of it. If Hillary wants to fight to the convention, who are they to tell her she can’t. Teddy Kennedy did it and he was further behind.
They think that everyone will come together in November to vote for Empty Suit Obambi. They couldn’t be more dead wrong about that. Once again the Democrats will lose another easy election.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Congratulations to Senator Obama who waged an ethical and smart campaign, and treated Hillary Clinton with dignity she is unworthy of.
_________________________________
you’re kidding, right? smart, maybe.
ethical? yeh, right. The Congrats should go the liberal suck a$$ media who rarely dare to question this guy…who rec’d passes on soooo many things that should have brought him down. Anytime someone questions his character, it’s a “distraction”…SKREEEW him.
Posted by: babs | May 29, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Hey Folks:
Are you listening to yourselves?
The economy is in the toilet, your wages aren’t keeping pace, your children are failing in school, and the rest of the world is going on without you.
The Bush Administration launched a war that should never have been, Valerie Plame was made a pawn in the Cheney retaliation machine, and John McCain is promising 4 more years of the same. Just look at Scott McClellan’s book for an insight.
While the Democrats are bickering amongst themselves, the Republicans are going to steal another election – and we will all be sitting back, asking ourselves “WHAT HAPPENED”.
Is this really what you want? A civil war of words between two divided Americas? Will these hollow snipes comfort you when you are standing in the unemployment line? What will you explain to your children when you send them to bed hungry, that you won? How will you tell your parents that they have to stand in the soup kitchens because of your point of view?
We are one America. Together many things can be possible, divided we are doomed. The last seven years have made this very clear – and we are bickering?
Posted by: Mickey | May 29, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
DELEGATES ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF VOTERS….BIG SURPRISE IN NOVEMBER WHEN THE DEMOCRATIC MATH DOESN’T ADD UP IN FAVOR OF THEIR GUY.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
There’s a very good reason that Hillary is known as THE most polarizing and divisive political candidate in the history of modern politics. Look at what she has done to the minds of her supporters. She has incited them like they were a bunch of out of control and irrational insurgents. Hillary has said THE most negative things any politician has ever said about a fellow democrat. I’m so glad her attacking nature didn’t prevail this time (they are in shock that it didn’t). We as human beings can be so much better than these unsavory Clintons. They lie, cheat, steal, berate, whine, complain, and blame anyone and everyone for their losses, when they need to look in the mirror. Just say NO to Hillary as VP. Please!
Posted by: rco | May 29, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
If Hillary Clinton is the “strongest candidate”, why did she lose the Democratic primary?
Could it be all of her pandering and lying? Could it be that too many Americans don’t trust her?
Gotta go – the *sniper fire* here has just picked up something fierce…
Posted by: John Powalski | May 29, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
The people have spoken and HRC has lost the race for the DNC nominee. Reid, Pelosi, Dean, and the DNC are making the right choice based on the millions who have already voted. Florida and Michigan made the decision for early voting, not the DNC. Why should the will of the people be changed to suit HRC camp? BO is the front runner and should be the DNC nominee. HRC camp will have to abide by the rules. Also, HRC needs to concentrate whether she will be elected again for the NY senate after running such a negative race.
Posted by: comeonpeople | May 29, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Maybe now Hillary will concede defeat! I could never understand how she initially agreed to punish FL and MI for violiting the rules, then when her campaing is losing she wants to change the rules to benefit her. Sorry Hill it doesn’t work that way…Hillary and her senior advisors ran a lousy campaign and they didn’t have a plan past Super Tue. Sen Obama is the best candidate and he will go on to deaft John McBush in the GE.
Posted by: whcjr46 | May 29, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
June 3 is on the horizon. Democrats unite!!
Posted by: Julie | May 29, 2008 3:54:46 PM
=======================================
….Only in your dreams julie!!!!!
I’m finished with the democrats.
Hillary OR McCain ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | May 29, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
That’s right – Senator Obama’s delegate lead over Hillary is now 199. We have a winner.
Posted by: John Powalski
——————
IF Obambi is as great as you all think he is, why hasn’t he closed the deal?
There is NO winner until someone hits 2025. If FL and MI are included that number goes up.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Same ploy as good old Chicago politics– Obama forced out his competitors because he didn’t want to give the voters a choice; the only way he could get elected. The challenges on the petitions are well documented and go against the spirit of counting every vote. If someone printed instead of using cursive then their signature was thrown out, etc. Now that’s interesting, because nowhere else do signatures need to be 100% cursive. This was dirty politics, plain and simple.
The DNC didn’t want Michigan & Florida to count from the beginning, because they knew the voters would go for Hillary. Pelosi and Dean think they are royalty and know better than the voters. They are as haughty as BHO.
Good bye Democratic party, and good riddance. I’m looking forward to voting for Colin Powell, someday, but I won’t vote for Obama ever.
Posted by: New Republican | May 29, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
HRC is playing the oldest trick in the political book. Count on the fact that most people won’t bother to educate themselves on what the law or the party rules are, lie about what they say because they don’t favor your position(under the guise of protecting the little people), and then get on your soapbox and scream “Count the votes” to whip people into a frenzy. Complete demagoguery. Just yesterday a court in Florida ruled that a political party can set whatever rules it wants for a primary – it’s not a final election for an office, it is a political primary. Everybody in Florida will vote for President in November; nobody is being disenfranchised. The DNC set the rules for its party’s nominating process, and Hillary and her representatives on the DNC voted to approve those rules, without any outrage. To call the implementation of those rules now illegal or anti-democratic just shows how ill-informed HRC’s supporters are. People: do a little research! If HRC considered the punishment of the Florida Democratic party such an outrage, where was she when the DNC made that decision MONTHS AGO? She was flying around in her corporate jet, staying at the Bellagio because she thought she had the nomination all wrapped up…and she didn’t give a rat’s butt about it. Count the votes? No, it’s count the frauds.
Posted by: joejohnson | May 29, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
j.r…. they are too desperate to listen.
SHE BLEW IT…thanks to babba…
Posted by: newthought | May 29, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Bill and Hill are has-beens. The Democratic Party has moved on. I for one am jubilant that we will no longer need to see either of them on the news after June 3rd. Halleluiah!!
It’s time to support the nominee that won fair and square. For the supports that did not choose Obama from day one, it’s not too late. Come on, here’s to winning in November, and to no more years of Republican control. That includes the White House.
OBAMA!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: judesuper | May 29, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Mickey: We are already standing in the unemployment line; our children are going to bed hungry, and receiving little food from the church. This is way; we are fighting hard to make sure the best candidate get into office. And, I do not want Nancy, Dean or the other to pick for me. All of them (Nancy and DNC party) turn down the opportunity to impeach W. Bush two years ago. If they have done their job, maybe I would take a chance with the weaker candidate but not this time.
Posted by: cmyvote2008 | May 29, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Doesn’t matter about the math….she can still take it to the convention, as long as she still has 17 million + supporters behind her. My god, other men have done it for less.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Obama hasn’t won anything. There is a magic number one must hit. Has he done it yet NO! You don’t get the nomination just by being ahead.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
New Republican says:
The DNC didn’t want Michigan & Florida to count from the beginning, because they knew the voters would go for Hillary.
==========================
Do you realize how insane that sounds. Everyone agreed including Hillary that they wouldn’t count.
Posted by: d | May 29, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Many comments are saying things like “If not Hillary than McCain”. Does that mean these are two sides of the same coin? Is Hillary that much of a Republican? Is McCain that much of a Democrat? I don’t think so.
Its far more likely that the Republican attack machine is trying to keep the infighting between Obama and Clinton alive as long as possible, to protect McCain from the issues. Honestly, have any of you heard McCain say he’s FOR anything, other than staying in Iraq for another 100 years? Isn’t war where people die?
Posted by: Marie | May 29, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Please, y’all… yes, Obama is going to win. But no, Hillary is not a witch. Let’s lay off the sexist c**p and take the high road here. We have McBush lurking around, hoping we’ll be dumb enough to swallow the same tripe they’ve fed us for eight years. Please… let’s rally together and whatever it takes (as long as it doesn’t stoop to their levels of dehumanization and blindness) to win the White House in November.
Just another Obama-backer… but one who appreciates Hillary.
Posted by: Jon Trott | May 29, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Dennis you miss the point, Florida and Michigan will not help her win so get over it. If the votes are not there then its over why drag it out till August? Like it or not it is over and I suggest you get over it and support Obama if you will be voting for a Democrat if not get behind McCain those are your choices.
Posted by: batesba74 | May 29, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“Is this democracy in action? Why don’t they just ordain him now, since that’s who the DNC wants. Why continue with the charade of letting the voters decide?”
If that’s the way it’s going to be I am DONE with the Democratic Party! I thought we were the party of the people. But this primary season with its caucuses that give more delegates to the loser of the popular vote, and its superdelegates over-riding the votes of the people and its leadership declaring that “they” will decide has convinced me that this party doesn’t want me. They’d better hope they don’t need me. Or those like me.
Posted by: Charlie35 | May 29, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
They are already made the decision before the election started.
Posted by: catleya | May 29, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Here’s a thought:
There is, in fact, no way for the DNC to choose the nominee without alienating some of the people on the other side.
Both sides have arguments (some better, some worse, but none beyond the pale) for their preferred candidate.
However, at the end of the day, the DNC must choose one candidate. That candidate must have at least two qualities:
1. They must be able to unite the Democratic Party.
2. They must be able to beat John McCain in the General Election.
As to point 2. – Polls suggest that EITHER Clinton or Obama could defeat McCain in the GE (so that settles that question, its all speculation, anyway).
So, the real question for the DNC is which of the two candidates will best be able to unite the Democratic Party?
Personally, notwithstanding grave reservations, I happen to think that candidate is Obama.
Note: the question is not who won the primaries, counting one way, Hillary did, counting another, Obama has. The question is not who can win the general election, both can. The question is who can best unite the Democratic Party. I think it is Obama.
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Well only one person answered my question about why so-called Democrats now hate all the top leaders of their party. There are none so blind as those who cannot see. Hillary has turned you against your own party, and you are all playing right into the Republicans hands. God help us all.
Posted by: louielouie | May 29, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
j – you are just one of those that enjoys being used without getting anything in return. Bless you, and maybe you need to take a nap and try it again…
Posted by: Let's Be Real For A Minute | May 29, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
I do not know what new math people are using.. Since when does Hillary have the popular vote?? Obama is ahead in the popular vote even when counting all of Florida’s votes (By almost 200k). The only way is to throw Michigan’s vote in where Obama was not even on the ballot, and the lead is not enough to cover the amount he would have received had he been on the ballot. So Hillary and Hillary supporters have NO real factual way of proclaiming the popular vote (unless giving Obama 0 votes in Michigan is somehow fair). I think it is disturbing that being the only real candidate on the Michigan ballot that she still only won 55% of those voters. Facts are facts.. Hillary lost, get over it!! I know she certainly can’t! (See link for popular vote info)
Posted by: Darrell | May 29, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
catleya, who is they? Wasn’t Hillary all but ordained by the press before the race started? No one thought Obama had a chance back then!
Posted by: louielouie | May 29, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
I keep reading all of the Hillary supporters pointing out that Hillary is the stronger candidate. If that is the case, why did she lose twice as many states as she won? And, yes, if you discount the caucus states and include the state where Obama was not on the ballot, she comes close in popular votes. But, the problem with the whole popular vote argument is that this is not a contest to get the most popular votes, it is to get the most delegates. Obama won that contest hands down.
If he runs the country the way he ran his campaign, he should have not problem getting the country back on the right path. I think the way Hillary ran her campaign is indicative of her leadership ability.
Posted by: KC | May 29, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Debra: While you HRC supporters are in DC looking like a 1960′s rock star fan club because you cannot accept rules, Obama has asked his supporters to stay away, though some probably will not, and go and start signing up new voters instead. So, for every one of you lot who may really be GOP supporters anyway, he will have a new Dem voter to replace you! So, bye bye!
Posted by: KiwiTrici | May 29, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Its over for Hillary. It’s been over for Hillary for months now. There are seconds left, the clock is ticking and she is 200 points down. It’s time to put in the scrubs and tell your team they put up a good fight. Shake hands with your opponent and move on. Find some good you can do for the Democratic Party and our County instead of being intent on destruction.
Posted by: dan | May 29, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Darell,
If you look on ABC’s main page, with FL and MI included she is ahead in the popular vote. Clinton 17,410,209
Obama 17,234,194.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Let’s face it.
That’s what Democrat Party means:
They don’t have to listen to the public, they have the right to choose.
That is what they call it ” DEMOCRAT”
Posted by: catleya | May 29, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Hillary and Barack knew that Florida and michigan broke the rules by having early elections. You morons that want Hillary to capitalize from those votes regardless of those two illegal elections are pathetic!How is it the will of the people or the popular vote when people were told their vote wouldn’t count. I have family members in florida that didnt vote because of this and OBAMA WAS NOT ON THE BALLOT IN MICHIGAN YOU MORONS SO HOW IS THAT FAIR. Bottom line is Clinton is desperate and you 90′s zombies that follow her are empty shells.She said out of her own mouth these contests wouldn’t count but now she wants them to count when she needs them. She expected this nomination contest to be wrapped up in Feb. and was so arrogant she wasn’t prepared for that.Do you think she would . Every state matters. Not Just The Big Ones. He won more states. He is a newcomer and has run more than neck and neck with her.It is obvious that Obama and mcCain are running two different agenda. Even though she is a liar and selfish, her and obama are running for the same type of government.McCain is the complete opposite. if you were planning to support her than swith to McCain out of soreness you are dumb.I do not like her at all personally, but I would not vote for mcCain if Hillary won fair and square like Obama has.Hillary is not nor is she bigger than the democratic party.Remember that.Neither is Obama.
Obama 08
Posted by: TV | May 29, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
NEWS FLASH: John McCain is not George Bush. He is considered by his own party not conservative enough so I guess he is A Liberal Republican. He has every right to have an opinion on Iraq and he said 5 years our men and women could come home, but to just up and leave is irresponsible. He is a true War hero and has seen and gone through things we cant imagine lets show him the respect he deserves for his service. Do really think any politician likes to watch American Service men and women Die? I don’t Republican Democrat if they would just stop fighting each other and meet in the middle America will benefit from that, until then it will not get any better no matter who is in office.
Posted by: batesba | May 29, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
louielouie: When we vote Nancy and the other into office, it was our understanding that they would clean up this mess made the Bush, from our men and women home and impeach him. Our men and women at still at war, no hears that account for any results, no impeachment process against Bush and Cheney. And, it was Nancy that stroke down the impeachment idea from other leaders within the party. This Democrat party has done nothing and need to go home.
Posted by: Willie | May 29, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
- you are just one of those that enjoys being used without getting anything in return. Bless you, and maybe you need to take a nap and try it again…
Posted by: Let’s Be Real For A Minute—-
Hmmm, if I remember right I was doing pretty well during Bill Clinton’s administration. You will see how used you will be if Obama gets elected.
I don’t need a nap I just got up a while ago because I have a real job that I go to every night.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
She said it herself. This is personal for her. She is putting all of us and the Democratic Party behind her personal goal…to become the first female President—at any cost! Even recalling the historical significance of RFK to insinuate her personal justification to destroy Senator B. Obama and the Democratic party for her personal issues. She IS A MEGALOMANIAC.
Posted by: TruthSeeker17771 | May 29, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Pelosi is basically saying she does not agree with there being superdelegates. By saying superdelegates should not exercise personal judgement, Pelosi is changing the rules.
Superdelegates are free agents, put there to use personal judgement. It is why there are there.
Superdelegates may not listen to Pelosi, but she threatens and many are frighten for their jobs.
Clinton must take this to the convention, the one debate Obama cannot run away from.
Posted by: S. Johnsen | May 29, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
I voted in FLORIDA because it was the primary and I knew that the democrats would not be so stupid that they would ignore our votes.
Funny how 1.7 MILLION people(more than all the caucus states)voted in our primary. More than ever before! We voted because we KNEW that our votes would make an impact.
Go ahead and ignore our votes. They will be counted in November with a win for McCain! 2000 all over again.
Keep your rules and you get your rules and a republican president!
Posted by: Dennis Smith | May 29, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
J! As pointed out by others Obama was not even on the Michigan Ballot. So if you take the votes that went to undecided and assume they were for Obama Boom he is back in front. You are really desperate
Posted by: batesba74 | May 29, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Willie, I do understand your frustration with our Democratic congress not being able to fix everything quickly. I share that pain and longed for impeachment, too! But realistically, Bush spent years making this mess, and vetoes much of their work. It will take time for us to clean it all up, unfortunately. But I still think the Dems will do more to make things better than the Reps. McCain will not be a change for the better. Though I back Obama (and am currently unhappy with Hillary) I would still vote for Hillary over McCain. Their stands on the issues are not that different.
Posted by: louielouie | May 29, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
How can a presumptive nominee keep losing in such a big margin one state after the other? The Democratic Party presidential process SUCKS! Votes did not count.The party elders have kept bullying SDs. What a shame!
Posted by: SP | May 29, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
louielouie:
I suspect Clinton’s supporters are seeing red because they feel certain leaders in the Democratic Party have played a little loose with the rules. Sure, the DNC has acted within its rights to exclude Michigan and Florida, but somehow those decisions have always favored one candidate – Obama.
Florida should never have been excluded in the first place, since it was not the Florida Democratic Party that moved up their state primary, it was the Republican controlled Florida State Legislature. So, the votes of Florida Democrats have been dismissed because of the actions of the Repubican party!
As to MI. Michigan Democrats violated the rules, and the Michigan primary was rightly disqualified. However, there was a chance to repair that situation by holding a second primary – Hillary was willing, Obama said no.
When DNC Chairman Howard Dean says (quoting the above article): “We agree there won’t be a fight at the convention,” he said, later adding that “simple math indicates” Barack Obama is likely to become the Democratic nominee” Hillary’s supporters see red.
The math, such as it is, is an accident of a fundamentally defective process. Those defects have always favored Obama.
When DNC leaders like Pelosi, Dean, and Reid push “the math” and then add lets make our decision now, they are clearly saying – ignore the defects – lets just get on with it and coronate Obama.
I can understand that Clinton’s supporters would find this upsetting.
I say this, as someone who is more inclined to favor Obama’s claim to the nomination. ;-)
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Look at the two pictures above real good. This is what is wrong with this country. The dems have control of congress and they smile about it while we all pay for it when we buy food and gas. Take a good look at them and ask yourself if they even know what a gallon of milk costs these days?
Yes slam me for the Bush thing but bottom line is the dems have the power but wont use it because they think we are all stupid enough to blame the president.
Posted by: Jim Rod | May 29, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Hillary Clinton is not the Democratic Party and the whole world does not revolve around her FACT
Either she gets with the democratic program or she suffers political isolation. In the pecking order of rank among the senators she is 36, no power no glory. political realities.
Obama 08
Posted by: JLD1959 | May 29, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
J! As pointed out by others Obama was not even on the Michigan Ballot. So if you take the votes that went to undecided and assume they were for Obama Boom he is back in front. You are really desperate———Posted by: batesba74 |
I think those totals include the uncommitted going to him in that state. Who cares he is going to lose and lose big come November.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
What is so wrong about us finally having a choice? Is everyone so complacent that they just want everything done in two seconds. Our world has turned into a society of give it to me now, new and what’s next…
Our young portion of society add another element to this…what’s in it for me. So what if the election process is long? Oh I see, for those of you who see your candidate as the right choice want that shoved down our throats without going through the process. I do not want to be like China, Saudi nations, or any other country that doesn’t want its people to have choices. I am proud of Hillary staying in this race until the end. I am so sick of Obama.
Posted by: Kris | May 29, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Superdelegates are free agents, put there to use personal judgement. It is why there are there. When Senior-Dems say superdelegates should not exercise personal judgement, Pelosi is basically saying she does not agree there should be superdelegates.
Pelosi is changing the rules. Superdelegates may not listen to Pelosi, but she threatens and many are frighten for their jobs.
Obama done this before. There is nothing Presidential about this tug: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/index.html
Posted by: S. Johnsen | May 29, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Bho will lock in alright, but he has locked into a loser’s club as well.
It’s a pity that a phony hypocrite has to be chosen as the nominee to lose a sure win in November.
Posted by: Olbermn3 | May 29, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
No candidate is perfect or near it. just admit it . You Obamabashers don’t want him because he is black #1. All the other reasons you give are just to cover up your racial bigotry. You need any excuse and hillary is leading the charge to find it.
Posted by: TV | May 29, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
louielouie: I will accept Obama only if Nancy, Howard Dean and other DNC leaders are out of office. They have created this mess too by just saying on their a@@@. They have both the houses and need more time. No more time for them. If Obama or Hillary wins they will just F### Obama or Hillary too like they have done us. No more time for them. I am sick of their action.
Posted by: Willie | May 29, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know,” 56 times under oath!!!!!!!!!
Either Hillary Clinton doesn’t have the cognitive memory capacity to be President of the United States, or, she is guilty of perjury.
It’s one or the other.
Decide for yourself if Hillary has the INTEGRITY to be President of the United States and LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD.
Remember: Bill and HILLARY already HAD 8 YEARS, OR, 2920 DAYS to get the job done. Was that not enough time to accomplish their goals and objectives? They couldn’t accomplish their goals and objectives in 8 years, or 2920 days, because they are DIVIDERS and not Unifier’s.
Leaders unify and move their agendas forward. Partisans divide and their agendas go no where.
Posted by: TruthSeeker17771 | May 29, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Fact Checker,
I commend you for explaining that. It’s nice to see an Obama supporter with some sense for a change.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
The party chairpersons’ in Florida and Michigan KNEW what they were doing when they moved up there primaries. They must be penalized or else every state in the union would have primaries when ever they want. Hillary has lost. Please lets be done with it.
Posted by: Brenda | May 29, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
louielouie: You are not accurate when you say Bush Vetoes all they have tried to do he has only used his veto power 9 times. Only 14 presidents have used their veto power fewer times than Bush, and only one president since the start of the 20th century has issued fewer vetoes. The fact is the Democratic party was all talk and so far no action. If you really want to pin it down the economy has been on a steady decline since when 2006 and what happened in 2006 that’s right the Democrats won the majority of the House and a Virtual tie in the Senate. .
Posted by: batesba74 | May 29, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Superdelegates are put there to exercise personal judgement. Pelosi are not only saying they have to commit, she says they must vote with the pledged delegates. Pelosi thinks superdelegates should not be there.
Superdelegates exist. Those are the rules. Pelosi is changing the rules to refuse democracy in action. Shameful.
Posted by: S. Johnsen | May 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Belle,Why aren’t you mad over the way Hillary ran her campaign? She was the final say over every decision. Why are you blaming everybody but the right person? That would be Hillary.
Posted by: Brenda | May 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Fact checker, you are a rare bird these days — a thoughtful person who tries to see both sides of the issue!
I do understand the frustration of those who wanted to see Hillary elected, but it seems to me fairly obvious pandering by her to seat 100 percent of the FL and MI delegates. I feel sorry for the voters in those two states, both those who voted and now feel their votes don’t count, and those who stayed home now to find the votes might count. It is a big mess that should be straightened out before the next primary so we can avoid this.
I don’t understand why anyone would switch to McCain, though, unless they are acting purely out of revenge. But it’s a free country, and I know some Republicans who are going to vote Dem for the first time in their lives, so I will keep on hoping till the GE!
Posted by: louielouie | May 29, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Sen Clinton is only ahead when you count FL and MI (where he wasn’t on ballot) AND you EXCLUDE the caucuses…..Sen clinton likes to act like she cares about FL/MI, she doesn’t or she wouldn’t want to disenfranchise 4 entire states and the poor people in MI and FL that didn’t vvote because they KNEW it didn’t count….She should worry about her NY Senate seat – she may lose it
Posted by: TR-NY | May 29, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
J: I agree he will lose but he won the right to be the Candidate on the ballot.
Posted by: batesba74 | May 29, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Obama a uniter, what a joke, he can’t even unite the Democratic Party or haven’t you noticed? If Obama wanted to unite us, why didn’t he come out instantly to discredit the weird Kennedy Assassination stories, no he waited three days? History has proven that it is always up to the swing states, and Hillary has that locked up.
Posted by: Matilda | May 29, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
batesba74: I am last week and now an independent. You are so right. This is my major problem with the Democrat party was given the majority of the House and Senate by the Democrat party and some Republican that switched over. What have they done so far, no think…. But try to tell us who we should vote for.
Posted by: Willie | May 29, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Pelosi wnats to be the most powerful woman in the U.S., she’s a b*tch!
Posted by: Denise | May 29, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
I switched to INDEPENDENT last month!
Posted by: Denise | May 29, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Hillary Clinton chose to vote for the greatest military disaster in history because she was afraid to lose her congressional seat. If you can’t take a stand at a moment like that(to damn with politics), than you have no principles. then you are truly a flip flopper.
That in my book makes her unworthy to ever be president.
Posted by: Eyonik | May 29, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
I am a diehard democrat. (Never to vote Republican again) If the DNC continues supporting Obama and if he is the nominee, I will switch parties. I cannot be associated with a bunch of dumb fools. At this point McCain has my vote over Bama Mama.
Posted by: Winfred | May 29, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Obama won more states! Bill likes to say she is winning the general election. The general election is in November.Bill must be confused.He cannot be misleading. After all he didn’t inhale and he did not have sexual relations with that woman.Come on America. Do you really want to put this family back in the White House? Are the Clintons the only ones that can save democratic America? is that all we have?
Posted by: TV | May 29, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Willie: I am voting McCain but to tell you the truth I think elections are becoming picking the lesser of two evils, not voting for the best candidate. Heck maybe I will vote for myself. Nobody ever runs on what they believe but instead on who can dig up the most dirt. Personally I am not linking McCain to Bush or Obama to Rev. Wright I do not believe it is fair to hold someone accountable for the actions or words of others, they can not control them.
Posted by: batesba74 | May 29, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
The super delegates were designed to pick the person they thought was the strongest candidate and could win the election.
Dean, Pelosi and Reid have no business pushing this process along nor do they have the right to come out and say that they should vote how the people they represent voted. They are there to exercise independent judgment.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Here’s the deal:
(Somehow everyone misses this)
#1 Obama hasn’t won it
#2 Pledged delegates can vote for whomever they choose (vote their conscience). They DO NOT, I repeat THEY DO ****N O T**** have to vote for the candidate who won in the primary.
#3 Superdelegates were put into place to balance the popular vote and make sure an unelectable candidate doesn’t get chosen (like Obama, supposedly). These people can switch sides at will.
For those who cry that the above isn’t democratic, that is true, but this is internal politics of the democratic party. If you look at a bar graph of votes between the two, it would look pretty even. I’m betting Hillary is thinking that a party that is willing to elect a “American Idol” candidate as flawed and green behind the ears as Obama should be torn apart. What she doesn’t realize, is that she too is very flawed.
Posted by: Joe | May 29, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Hillary leaves Democrat Party.
Run Independent.
Posted by: catleya | May 29, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Nicholas, you really need to calm down. Hillary had this locked up when she first started. Why are you not mad with her for the way she ran her campaign? She had the dream team for her campaign. $73 million dollars in her war chest. Today she is leaving bills all over the place and in debt up to her neck. If this is how she rans her campaign…what will she do with the country. But for whatever reason your war cry is “she is the better candidate?” Seriously? Wow!
Posted by: Brenda | May 29, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
There is no doubt in my mind that many posters in these comment sections are Republicans posing as Democrats and spewing misinformation in an effort to make it appear that the Democratic Party has been irreparably damaged by the extended primary campaign and cannot win the general election no matter who is the party’s nominee. Well, the truth is that any real American knows that either Obama or Clinton would make a great President. Furthermore, the mere fact that one of them will win the Democratic nomination according to the rules governing such that have been in place for a long time is not going to cause supporters of the loser to rush to support McSame. As proof that this won’t happen, I offer the latest Zogby poll, which shows that Obama has pulled out to a 10 point lead over McSame in the last week. And, I believe this gap will widen considerably once the primaries are over and Sen. Clinton throws her support behind Obama (it does appear at this point that Obama will be the duly chosen nominee). However, the same would happen, if Sen. Clinton won the nomination and Obama threw his support behind her. The GOP is already deathly afraid of the November elections because they see the Democratic landslide in the making. Following the lead of such brilliant GOP luminaries as Rush Limbaugh, the Republicans think they can confuse the electorate one more time to the point of making the wrong choice in November. Well, I have news for them, it isn’t going to happen. The American People know exactly what the Bush Administration’s policies have done to harm them. And, they’re not foolish enough to put into office a senile, old man, who is promising nothing more than to continue those policies.
Posted by: Caliguy55 | May 29, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
So can Obama get the nom…run for the next couple of months against McCain, and then if something radioactive happens before August/convention, the Super d’s can change their mind in August? That could happen right? No one is really the nom until convention?
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Another way to look at this –
McCain is running for Bush’s 3rd term and Hillary is running for Bill’s 3rd term. You can see how badly he/she wants it. The do anything mentality to get my/their way.
Let’s have change, no more years of the same that we would get from either of the former ruling families – no more Bush and no more Clintons.
Posted by: Mary | May 29, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
batesba74: I am protesting against the DNC party and Hillary or McCain is my pick. I will not stay home in the election. My voice will be heard.
Posted by: Willie | May 29, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
There was a Clinton supporter on FOX today who will be in Washington along with 10,000 other Hillary supporters to voice their displeasure at how this whole process clearly sucks (unlike Republicans who have a simple winner take all). That is just the tip of the ice burg they (DNC) are not worrying about. Her supporters don’t matter, they’re quieter….and this supporter said she would work as hard for McCain as she has for Hillary. Me too. I wonder how many millions of us there are? The exit polls in November will be FASCINATING.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Everyone knew (or should have known) the stakes when Michigan and Florida decided to hold their primaries early. The voters of those two states were disenfranchised at that time. Their party leaders knew the consequences, but what they didn’t know was it would be Obama leading in the voting (not Hillary).
Changing the rules changes the game. Everyone knows that. But changing the rules after the game has started is cheating.
Posted by: New Englander | May 29, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
I’m sorry to disagree with you, but Bush and McCain ARE the same. They are both marionettes of the Republican dynasty, manipulated by the likes of Karl Rove and Scooter Libbey.
Just look at the exposure Scott McClellan has done on the Republican propaganda mechanism.
Posted by: Alfred | May 29, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Why is it that Wrights followers including Obama act like Blacks have the right to be prejudice and anti-American?
Posted by: DREW | May 29, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Maybe after Senator Clinton is elected President he can sign a bill requiring all state leaders to take a class on running their primaries, with Florida and Michigan being put top on the list! Seriously, if you live in one of these states make your leaders accountable. There’s nothing the rest of us in the country can do to help and just getting mad on a message board after the fact does no good.
Posted by: jmengate | May 29, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
THE DEMOCRAT BOSSES ARE SHOVING OBAMA DOWN OUR THROATS….PERIOD.
HILLARY SUPPORTERS WILL THROW-UP OBAMA ON THE DEMOCRAT BOSSES IN NOVEMBER…PERIOD
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Truth Be Told: The DNC party needs to feel our pain today, tomorrow, the next day and the day of the general election. I want them to worry every single day until the day of the general election of their pick for the Democrat party. No sleep for the Nancy, Dean, and other.
Posted by: Willie | May 29, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
I sat through many, many years of my Pastor preaching that the only way was to vote Republican. Every Sunday, year after year.
I vote Democrat. Always have, always will. Perhaps that is difficult for some to understand, but just because the Pastor says it is so, doesn’t mean it is.
Reverend Wright is from another time, another era. His experiences were more hostile than mine. I’ve benefited from his struggles; but that doesn’t mean I agree with everything he says.
Surprise! I am able to make my own decisions.
Posted by: Mickey | May 29, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Michael,
Again, Obama DOES NOT have 2025. That number goes up if they count FL an MI. Until he gets those numbers NOBODY has won anything.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Protesting the Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting or “Sex and The City” – The Movie?
Hillary supporters have a tough choice this weekend. ;)
Posted by: Erik | May 29, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
I just got another pledge card from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), this one with a letter from John Edwards. Tuesday I got one with a plea from Nancy Pelosi. I’m sending them both back in their postage paid envelopes with the note “Remember Florida and Michigan- when you restore democracy in the party I might might once again consider sending more money and voting for Democrats”
I live in Georgia
Posted by: Bill | May 29, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
If any portion of the delegates in FL and MI are seated, does that mean the votes are counted? Even without the votes in FL and MI, Hillary will be ahead in the popular vote next week. How does the democratic party nominate a weaker candidate when he doesn’t have the majority of votes? Is it just because he has more pledged delegates and he says he is the winner? Obama is a flash in the pants who bought his nomination. What is the matter with the superdelegates?
Posted by: Susan | May 29, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
THE DEMOCRAT BOSSES ARE SHOVING OBAMA DOWN OUR THROATS….PERIOD.
HILLARY SUPPORTERS WILL THROW-UP OBAMA ON THE DEMOCRAT BOSSES IN NOVEMBER…PERIOD
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Why haven’t the remaining super delegates made their choice? What are they waiting for? With almost everybody especially the media saying that Obama has the nomination, why don’t they make their choice now.
Posted by: Why Not | May 29, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Yo Why Not: In answer to your question, it is because they are living in the same state as Hillary: DENIAL!!!
Posted by: virgoml | May 29, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
We’re voting no to the media bias against Hillary since the start. We’re voting no to the DNC bias against Hillary. We’re voting no to sexist, racist treatment of Hillary supporters! We’re voting no to scare tactics by Obama supporters! We’re voting no to threats and insults from Obama supporters! We’re voting no to bullying by Obama supporters! We’re voting no to Obama supporter silence when racist, bigoted remarks fly from other Obama supporters. We’re voting no to this cycle of abuse from Obama supporters!! We’ve had enough of abusive Obama supporters and we’re saying NO! We’re rising up, standing up and saying NO!! NO MEANS NO!!!
Posted by: former dem in chicago | May 29, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Clinton supporters…open your eyes and be sentiment free of this thing! It doesn´t help your very course to wanna destroy your own party because your candidate has lost!!
Why all the cheap and irritating hate against Obama? What has this young face of Hope and Change in this critical period of our National history(just like Bill Clinton was), done to you folks?? This is really really unprecedentedly sad even though you all know how Senator Clinton has mismanaged and gaffed off her own campaign until today!
I was supporting her but I think the fact she´s not yet ready to be graceful in defeat is a turn off. It wasn´t creed by God that she pursues another Clinton Dynasty pleeaassse! Stand the higher ground to put a democrat in the White House otherwsie your very consciences will route you like vampires tomorrow!
A word to a wise is sufficient!! Obama 08
Posted by: Bill | May 29, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Some democrat Harry Reid is – he’s pro-life. Nancy Pelosi took impeachment off the table, talks about the marble ceiling and then supports the man. Howard Dean is odd and is a loser. Obama has made it where he is by tearing down the Clintons and by outspending in every state. What leadership and what a party!!
Posted by: susan | May 29, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
I was reading an article the other day that the DNC does not have all the money needed to put the convention on. Maybe Obambi can cough up some of his money.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
This is tatamount to the Democratic leadership giing Clinton her walking papers. She brought this on herself by exlaiming that she’d take her fight to the convention floor, if that’s what it takes. She, like everone else, knows that such a move would be disasterous, since it would result in a gauranteed election for John McCain. Clinton doesn’t care about that. It would appear that she really doesn’t care if she is elected, but only that she is the first female presidential nominee in history. She just can’t stand that Obama will make similar history if he is nominated and her ego cannot accept that. She’s willing to let her childish desire stand in the way of her own party. It amazes me that her followers don’t see how shallow and self-serving she is. She doesn’t deserve the nomination and she won’t get it. The Rules Committe is not going to do her bidding and they WILL NOT do anything that thwarts the will of the people from states that followed the rules. And why is it that the pro-Clinton press is not reporting that she signed an agreement approving of the santions against MI and FL, agreed not to campaign in the states. She publically stated that the DNC had done the right thing in sanctioning the states. Now that she desperately needs those delegates, she screams that the DNC is disinfranchising those voters. Once again, she shows us she’s a liar and a political opportunist.
Posted by: Reality | May 29, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Thanks for nothing DNC. I will be voting for McCain in the Fall…And I live in Virginia.
Hillary 08!
Posted by: cb | May 29, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Maybe it is time that the democratic party split. There needs to be a conservative democratic party. Let the liberals have this party as it is such an embarrassment.
Posted by: susan | May 29, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
By why is there even a debate? Constitutional law is unequivocal. Every vote cast must be counted. This constitutional principle, pronounced by the United States Supreme Court since Ex parte Yarborough (1884) and reiterated as recently as Gray v. Sanders (1963), is simply beyond reproach. This rock-bottom constitutional demand applies to primaries as well as general elections. United States v. Classic (1941). Deliberately refusing to count votes cast may, under certain fact scenarios, constitute a Federal crime, United States v. Classic, citing now Section 241 of the Federal Crimes Code. Reiterating black letter law stated in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966), the high court reasserted in Bush v. Gore (2000) that “once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.”
Dean/Obama/Brazille/Pelosi have turned against the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), now the Senate Judiciary’s ranking minority member, asserted to us in an exclusive interview, that although as a learned attorney he remains obliged to see “how it plays out,” that “it may well be worthwhile” to hold Congressional hearings on the Democrats’ refusal to seat Florida and Michigan at the Democratic National Convention. “It’s certainly something I want to consider,” said Specter, ruefully hinting things might be different if he was still the Judiciary Chairman. “The essence of democracy is the right to vote,” asserted Specter
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Hello – I’m not stupid – I’m sticking it to the Washington insiders where it counts – in their pocketbook… and it isn’t just the postage … it’s the generous checks they won’t get.
Posted by: Bill | May 29, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Newsflash: The SDs have chosen. Some haven’t declared because they gave you and your candidate the respect and freedom to keep this torture going as long as it could. Once again, its wrong if its not your way. Once again, crying about how cruel the world is. Once again, the media keeps reporting that news stuff that keeps making your battle look like a bad one. Do yourself a favor…flip over to Fox, where THEY LOVE Hillary. They love every minute that she is around.
Posted by: MrMajek | May 29, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Debra,
I have lots of friends also will switch party including myself.
Posted by: catleya | May 29, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
J: That is true. Five weeks ago, the DNC has asked Obama for his list of high-level supporters and for him to write a letter on their behalf to money. It was until last week that they asked Hillary for her list. This is way; the media was thinking there would be a Hillary/Obama ticket. The DNC normally do not ask for supporter lists until after they have a nominee for the party.
Posted by: Willie | May 29, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Hillary has all the power in her hands. Any slimmer of a chance that Obama has of winning in November is dependent on Hillary Clinton working hard to get her supporters to vote for Obama. She should say screw you to Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean and all of the other jealous power snobs in the Democratic party and say that she will not endorse Obama. He would be CERTAIN to lose.
Or better yet, she should run an an independent. There is zero chance that Obama would win then. She would get millions of votes that take away from Obama.
So, Democratic party, sit up and shut up. Clinton has the power to undo you jerks. And she should, given the way that you all have thrown her under the bus.
What does Clinton have to lose? She’s a millionaire, set for life. She doesn’t need you jerks.
Posted by: jason101other | May 29, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Obama says one thing and does another. He is the one who fought against allowing FL and MI to be counted earlier so it worked to his advantage. Now isn’t he gracious to allow them to count when it is too late to make a difference. What a sweetie!!
Posted by: Susan | May 29, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Fakebama…thanks for the laugh. My dog covers his eyes when she’s on the screen. Someone really needs to talk to her to lay off the injections/tightening or whatever…she looks like the Joker from batman.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
I am not a wright suppoter but I understand some of his views and they are not anti American. They are anti the greed, self righteosness and murderous ways that many of our white yes white citizens have acted over the years.He gave it to you straight with no chaser and many white americans are not used to that.Yes, beleive it or not some black AMERICANS are “bitter” and we cling to our guns and religion to express our frustrations
Posted by: TV | May 29, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Truth Be Told – you really think Hillary will have a chance at the nomination after she helps wreck the party in 2008 and ushers in ANOTHER 4 years of this nightmare? Seriously? You really need to put down the pipe because that is not going to happen.
****************************************
John: You had better believe that Hillary will not only have a chance in 2012, she will dominate the primary and election.
You’ve got to be the biggest imbecile on the planet to think that it’s over. It’s not. Me and about 18 million other Hillary supporters WILL NOT VOTE for Obummer. Talk about screwing up the Democratic party. These Democrat King-Makers like Pilosi, Reid and Dean have done it already.
Vote McCain ’08 and Clinton in 2012!
Posted by: Truth Be Told | May 29, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
“Slippery Hillary” will do anything to steal the nomination, whether it is ethical or not. If you can’t win by the rules just change the rules, right Hillary?
Posted by: PhilBgood | May 29, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
The fight will go all the way to the August convention! Tomorrow a decision will be made regarding FL & MI on Saturday and only after the final states vote will Super delegates make a decision. That decision will be based on which candidate is best supported by voters and who can definatly beat McCain in a GE…whether you care to acknowledge it or not, Gallup poll has Hillary ahead of Obama, when it comes to winning.
With regard to Fl & MI: http://www.townhall.com/Common/PrintPage.aspx?g=adf29e7c-bcc5-4e23-b72f-8985dfe092af&t=c
With regard to corruption;
http://rezkowatch.blogspot.com/search/label/RezkoWatch%20HotList
GOOD LUCK HILLARY
Posted by: Di | May 29, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Jason…you are so right and I remember hearing a guy on cable news say just that. This election WILL be up to her and how she handles her supporters. Thing is…I’m an American first and Hillary supporter second. I will NEVER vote Obama, she could get on her knees and plead with the millions of us….we won’t.
She really should stay neutral and say what Michelle Obama was quoted as saying when asked if she could vote for Hillary….”I don’t know”. Ferraro has been on the news saying that all week. She doesn’t know if she can vote for Obama. Hillary should be honest, break from the party and run as Indie in 2012.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
I certainly hope that “HELLO” isn’t on Obama’s “Bring the County Together Team”
He or she won’t win any friends.
Posted by: Bill | May 29, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
TV…too bad there are only 14% of Americans (blacks) who think like you…not enough to win an election.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Truth Be Told – Anyone who thinks either Senator Clinton or Senator Obama will have any chance of ever winning a Presidential election in 2012 if the Dems blow it this year are seriously deluding themselves. With the advantage the party has there’s absolutely no excuse for blowing it. A vote for McCain in ’08 equals a vote against both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama in 2012 as they’ll both be toast.
Posted by: jmengate | May 29, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Anne,
Thanks for your thoughts. I will not vote for Obama either if Hillary gives up this race. I can’t wait to see Obama suffers from a humiliating defeat in November. DNC will learn the hard way!
Posted by: Dallas | May 29, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Debra,
Murdoch just went interview today and said he thinks Obama will win in November.
If these billionaires are behind him, I’m afraid McCain would be in trouble also.
Posted by: catleya | May 29, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
I’m a lifelong Democrat and I’m amazed at the Hillary supporters who are threatening to vote for McCain in the fall. Have you folks actually looked at McCain’s positions on the issues?
I voted for Obama in my state’s primary, but I have always felt that if Hillary was the nominee I would vote for her in the general election. The Democrats must prevail in November; the world cannot afford a “third Bush term.” Do you really want to punish the whole country just because your candidate lost? Are your hurt feelings worth sinking another four years into the quagmire of Iraq?
Posted by: steve | May 29, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Obviously the democratic party is divided and Hillary is leading the charge. She kept asking why hasn’t Obama closed the deal? I ask why was he so able to do so well? It was an obvious rejection to her and lets be real their vote is almost split and if she has already won the people you need in november like she claims then where will Obama’s supporters go? He has the same amount as her just about.Does she really think those 17 million of his will just automatically come to her. If she was so strong why was he able to run neck and neck with her in the popular vote. She should have beat him. I don’t want to vote for McCain but if he becomes the maverick he once was and stops trying to stand on the traditional republican platform, and she steals, whines and successfully accomplishes her assasination attempt of Obama I will vote McCain!
Posted by: TV | May 29, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
I am voting for my country not for the party. I don’t feel that Obama is the best candidate. I have never voted Republican. I have two options 1. Stay home or 2. Vote McCain.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Dallas – “I can’t wait to see Obama suffers from a humiliating defeat in November” – You do realize that if that happens that Senator Clinton would have absolutely 0% chance of getting a chance to run as a Democrat in 2012, right?
Posted by: jmengate | May 29, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Well said matt! Lets hear McCain and Obama debate about what’s the best direction for this country to take and then let us make a decision in November.
Hillary ran a poor campaign after she flaunted herself as the inevitable candidate in ’07 and said she “would be the nominee” after super Tuesday. She sanguinely pronounced Florida wouldn’t count and now she is a masquerading as the defender of the disenfranchised? And to my amazement people are buying this Blatant Political Hail Mary!! Its totally beyond me. Its time to move on… She needs to start taking notes from Romney’s gracious way of bowing out of the race. Even Huckabee did a better job of exiting the race.
McCain or Obama ’08 after June 3.
Posted by: John Doe | May 29, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
TV,
The problem is he HASN’T closed the deal. Why is that?
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Lee
I agree totally! Obama will be the appointed nominee. The Party leaders and Obama are a disgrace to the party. Hillary needs to go all the way to the convention and then go Independent if necessary! Hillary needs to show everyone that they can’t push her out…
Posted by: Debbie F | May 29, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Steve:
You write: “I’m a lifelong Democrat and I’m amazed at the Hillary supporters who are threatening to vote for McCain in the fall. Have you folks actually looked at McCain’s positions on the issues?”
________________________________________
My sentiments exactly!
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
J,
Got it right.
I guess lots of Dems will do too.
Posted by: catleya | May 29, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
CONSTITUTION LAW SAYS ALL VOTES MUST COUNT….IT DOES NOT MATTER IF IT IS A PRIMARY OR GENERAL ELECTION.. ALL VOTES MUST COUNT…PERIOD.
SEE ARTICLE BELOW:
Constitutional law is unequivocal. Every vote cast must be counted. This constitutional principle, pronounced by the United States Supreme Court since Ex parte Yarborough (1884) and reiterated as recently as Gray v. Sanders (1963), is simply beyond reproach. This rock-bottom constitutional demand applies to primaries as well as general elections. United States v. Classic (1941). Deliberately refusing to count votes cast may, under certain fact scenarios, constitute a Federal crime, United States v. Classic, citing now Section 241 of the Federal Crimes Code. Reiterating black letter law stated in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966), the high court reasserted in Bush v. Gore (2000) that “once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.”
Dean/Obama/Brazille/Pelosi have turned against the Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party.
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), now the Senate Judiciary’s ranking minority member, asserted to us in an exclusive interview, that although as a learned attorney he remains obliged to see “how it plays out,” that “it may well be worthwhile” to hold Congressional hearings on the Democrats’ refusal to seat Florida and Michigan at the Democratic National Convention. “It’s certainly something I want to consider,” said Specter, ruefully hinting things might be different if he was still the Judiciary Chairman. “The essence of democracy is the right to vote,” asserted Specter
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
To Obama supporters,
You can spend hundred years talking good about Mr. Hope and change as much as you want, over 17,000,000 Americans won’t buy your scraps! Do a “real survey” to see how many Hillary’s supporters will cross the aisle to vote for John McCain or will stay home in November. This number has increased day by day!
6 more months from today, don’t think that we will change our minds and be united under your Jerk Obama!NEVER!
Posted by: Dallas | May 29, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Actually some of McCain’s viewpoints aren’t that bad. He is against earmarks (which helped Obama’s wife’s employer), he would like to put limits on election spending (Obama bought his nomination), he doesn’t want to raise taxes (Obama would raise and spend like he did in his campaign), and so on. He wants us to win in Iraq which while I was opposed to the war in the first place, I don’t want us to just walk away at this point. Therefore, I’d rather take a chance on him than on Obama as I really have no clue as to what Obama is all about.
Posted by: susan | May 29, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
It is ironic that by spliting the party the Democrats could be responsible for the Supreme Court overturning Roe v Wade. We might want to get our act together.
Posted by: jmengate | May 29, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
They may not be liberal but they won’t be right wing either. You forget that there are some democrats who are slightly conservative. Bush Sr. appointed David Souter, don’t forget.
Posted by: Susan | May 29, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
HELLO:
you write: “just keep hoping the dozen or so crazy posters on here do not represent a real backlash against Obama in November.”
________________________________________
My sentiments exactly!;-)
I do suspect that many (if not all) of these self-styled “defectors” must be Republican plants who are trying to “stir up the pot.”
My only other explanation is that these “defectors” have never actually looked at McCain’s political history and future policies. If such “defectors” truly understood Hillary and her policies, they would recognize that the single, best way to KILL those policies is to vote for McCain.
You can be sure that if Obama is the Democratic nominee, Hillary Rodham Clinton will be voting for him in the General Election, whatever her so-called “supporters” decide.
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
In November there will be only one blue state (Illinois). The rest will be as red as the face of the DNC.
Hillary Supporters Unite!
Vote for McCain and an entire Republican ticket in November and send a message to the fools at the DNC as well as to our friend George Soros.
I’ve voted as a Democrat for 40 years and now is the first time I will vote for a Republican. I don’t like it, but it’s my only recourse to a frigging party that doesn’t listen to its base and to the party loyal. Screw you Pilosi, Reid and Dean.
Posted by: Truth Be Told | May 29, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
“McCain is not interested in overturning Roe v. Wade.” – Susan
Well you better hope that the Supreme Court justices he appoints feels the same way. I have a feeling that IF McCain does get into office, the chances of him putting in Pro-Choice justices are pretty slim.
Posted by: Darrell | May 29, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
I do suspect that many (if not all) of these self-styled “defectors” must be Republican plants who are trying to “stir up the pot.”
My only other explanation is that these “defectors” have never actually looked at McCain’s political history and future policies. If such “defectors” truly understood Hillary and her policies, they would recognize that the single, best way to KILL those policies is to vote for McCain.
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008 6:00:39 PM
=====================================
Typical arrogance of Obamamaniacs. Yep. all the people who’re posting anti-Obama comments are republicans, posing as democrats. Yep.keep fantasizing.
Posted by: long-term democrat | May 29, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
You talk about the feminists’ votes when the only woman candidate has been disrespected by Obama and all his supporters. Give me a break sweetie.
Posted by: susan | May 29, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
hernan,
How about you,one of stupid Obama’s supporters! You are too ignorant to see your stupidity. You have been licking Obama’s waste for so long that you don’t know what you are talking about!
Posted by: Dallas | May 29, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
HELLO:
you write: “just keep hoping the dozen or so crazy posters on here do not represent a real backlash against Obama in November.”
Hey all you imbeciles who think all of the Hillary supporters on this blog are Republican plants. Don’t kid yourselves!
In November the only blue state (thank you Truth Be Told) will be Illinois.
Yeah, November will be the biggest backlash you’ve ever seen. Just wait.
Posted by: Patriot | May 29, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Truth Be Told,
Thank You!That’s what I want to say to all Hillary supporters too!
Posted by: Dallas | May 29, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
I think she is trying to anger the “white” working class vote to the point where someone goes out and does something stupid. She is sending the signals. Her and Bill. and let’s not forget Mike huckabees statement. He knew what he was doing he was just surprised he got caught.Mike, Hill and Bill 3 southern rednecks that want to put that colored boy back in his place.
America deserves better than the good ole boys and an Annie okley wanna be running the country.America needs to stamp a symbolic seal of growth and broadcast it to the world by voting for Obama. Colin Powell may have been better but we need to start somewhere. I seriously doubt Obama will be as bad as the current administration. What he has done in garnering support in this campaign should muster some insight. Obama raised money . Hillary owes money.McCain barely has any money. Economy is written all over that. Who is the better money manager? The proof is in the pudding. And for all of McCain and Hillary’s experience why is America in all the mess it is in now? They are making it very clear they are a part of a system that is a problem. Obviously they do not know how to fix it. 25 – 40 years experience and look at America today.Their experience has us paying 4.00 a gallon gas, in iraq and in a mortgage crises. They are not the solution. They are the problem.
Posted by: TV | May 29, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
They are all politicians – even Obama who pretends that he isn’t. At least with McCain and Hillary there is a history that I can judge and I know that they love our country. I’m not sure what Obama and his wife think and if we question it, we’re slammed. I do know they didn’t get much love or respect for America in their church.
Posted by: susan | May 29, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
long-term democrat
Sorry if my post struck you as arrogant.
If you’ve read some of the more scurrilous posts on this blog supporting Hillary, thretening defection to McCain, and trashing Obama, I think you’d understand why I suspect them of being plants, i.e. false “defectors”, who are actually Republicans just trying to stir up division within the Democratic party.
I take it you count yourself among the “honest defectors”
Enlighten me, where are the points of similarity between Clinton’s political agenda & McCain’s political agenda, that you feel you can vote for McCain just as easily as Clinton, but “heaven forbid” never that “arrivistes” scoundrel Obama!:-)
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Long Term Democrat:
Fact Checker said that a vote for McCain was a vote against Hillary’s policies, and pointed out that these “defectors” were in reality Republicans trying to stir up a controversy.
To defect to McCain from either candidate is a vote against your own Democratic champion. The argument is to vote against McCain, and has nothing to do with Obama or Clinton.
Are you one of these Republicans trying to stir up the pot that Fact Checker was suggesting?
Posted by: Mickey | May 29, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
KC – do you know how many presidents won without winning the majority of states? That means very little.
Posted by: susan | May 29, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
So the DN leaders have crowned their winner and to hell with the votes of the US citizens. OK
I am now considering myself a newly registered Republican (first time ever) and will vote for McCain.
And to Hell with the DNC and its leaders – they are only in this for themselves and not for the good of the Democratic Party, and I for one, hope the Democratic Party implodes.
Posted by: Lou | May 29, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Whale Hunter,
Polls don’t mean anything. Look how many times they have been wrong in these primary races.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Hello
looks like you are going to say your goodbyes pretty soon… Obama will not win your goddess Pelosi wont be able to fix it and your messiah Obama is nothing of the sort!
Posted by: thinkingdem | May 29, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
He hasn’t closed the deal because of REV. Wright, Hillary Clinton and white fright.
Posted by: TV | May 29, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
I REALLY HOPE THE cLINTON’S COME TO TERMS WITH THE REALITY THAT HE IWL GOING TO BE THE NIMINEE. I HOPE OBAMA OFFERS HER A REALLY LARGE ROLE IN HIS ADMINISTRATION BECAUSE SHE HAS WORKED AND CAMPAIGNED VERY HARD. TIME TO HEAL AND UNITE!! OBAMA 2008
Posted by: Lou | May 29, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
HELLO:
By the way, Hon….
______________________
“Here’s looking at you kid”;-)
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
How do I switch to Independant in Florida ?
Posted by: Switch | May 29, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
TYPO CORRECTED SORRY:
I REALLY HOPE THE CLINTON’S COME TO TERMS WITH THE REALITY THAT HE IS GOING TO BE THE NOMINEE. I HOPE OBAMA OFFERS HER A REALLY LARGE ROLE IN HIS ADMINISTRATION BECAUSE SHE HAS WORKED AND CAMPAIGNED VERY HARD. TIME TO HEAL AND UNITE!! OBAMA 2008
Posted by: Lou | May 29, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
What did Reverend Wright mean when he said if Obama get’s the nomination ” I’m coming after YOU ” ?
What’s he holding back to crush Obama ?
Posted by: WhatsNext | May 29, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Why do people blame the DNC for Hillary’s downfall. She only has herself to blame. She had no plan after Super Tuesday, ran out of money and is in deep debt now. She needs to quit blaming it on everyone else and accept responsibility that she ran a bad campaign.
Posted by: erin | May 29, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Mickey,
It is really sad that I didn’t get through you. All I’m saying is that it is racism is unacceptable.
Posted by: Watson | May 29, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Whale Hunter,
We’ll see. I really don’t care because Obambi won’t win in November.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Fact checker (my new hero) wrote:
You can be sure that if Obama is the Democratic nominee, Hillary Rodham Clinton will be voting for him in the General Election, whatever her so-called “supporters” decide.
She said it herself. She will not only vote for him, she will campaign for him.
If Clinton supporters believe in her good judgment so passionately, perhaps they should think about this.
Posted by: louielouie | May 29, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
First let it be said once again. FL & MI violated party rules and are suffering for it. No one (including Obama) twisted their arms to make them violate the rules. All this talk about disenfranchisement is silly; if you knew what would happen when you broke the rules it seems STUPID to ack as if there was a conspiracy when it goes down. Now Hillary on the other hand had no problem with FL & MI until she discovered that she was no longer the heir apparent. What will we teach the youth if you tell them that there are rules but you can break them if you want, just have a candy-ass argument at the ready just in case anyone notices. Reason tells one that “adults” are the ones who are allowed to vote. No one should have to candy coat anything for “adults”, you break the rules you pay the price period. Hillary and Bill had no proplems with the rules when they worked in their favor but…..Ohhhhhh nelly do they ever now. It doen’t serve them or the american people well to play fast and loose with the rules, but hey win at any cost right. Seems disgustingly unamerican to me.
Posted by: Ken from Atlanta | May 29, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Obama will never be able to shake the stink from Trinity and Wright. Even tonight it’s all over the cable news….Rev. Pfleger’s sermon this past Sunday, screaming racism and all the congregation jumping to their feet in support. This Rev. was on Obama’s advisor committee and now Obama is distancing himself in a statement made today. He may not have known the good Rev. 20 years (like Wright)…but there seems to be a racist theme at Trinity that Obama will not be able to get away from.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Some self-styled Clinton democrats on this blog are threatening to defect to McCain if Obama getst the nomination.
I asked in an ealier post, but let me ask again:
Enlighten me, where are the points of similarity between Clinton’s political agenda & McCain’s political agenda, that you feel you can vote for McCain just as easily as Clinton, but “heaven forbid” never that “arrivistes” scoundrel Obama!:-)
If Obama is the Democratic nominee, you can be sure Hillary Rodham Clinton will be voting for him in Novemeber, whatever her so-called, former “supporters” decide.
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
PELOSI IS SCAREY LOOKING…LOOKS LIKE THE JOKER FROM BAT MAN. FOR WHAT IT’S WORTH I HATE AXLEROD MORE THAN I DON’T LIKE OBAMA.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
For all you folks questioning if I’m a real Democrat. YES. I’ve been a loyal registered Democrat and even voted for JFK and George McGovern. Let’s talk about why I’m shifting my vote to McCain. I hate it, but I will NOT vote for Obama.
Obama will raise your taxes (even the middle income).
Hillary stated clearly that she would not raise taxes on the middle income, but only on those who make in excess of $250,000 a year.
McCain will not raise your taxes either and has pledged against it.
Now, let’s talk about where I live. I live in Southern California. Hillary took California decisively in the primary.
Now, let’s talk about whether there’s going to be a massive backlash in this country come November.
YES. Hillary supporters are disillusioned by the DNC, Howard Dean, Nancy Pilosi and Harry Reid. Many of us will not vote for Obama because he and his wife have demonstrated that they have a clear agenda that certainly doesn’t include the white blue collar worker or to some extent the middle class.
For all of you folks that think that we are racist, this couldn’t be further from the truth, but we will not support a candidate like Obama no matter the color of his skin.
WE ARE THE BLUE COLLAR AND MIDDLE CLASS WORKERS OF AMERICA AND WE WILL NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES VOTE FOR A MAN WHO WILL DESTROY THIS COUNTRY.
Posted by: Patriot | May 29, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
And Susan, I am a middle-aged white woman who proudly considers herself both a feminist and an Obama supporter. Many of my feminist friends will vote for Obama as well. And yes, we are still on wonderful terms with our friends (though there are only a few) who support Hillary. Even the diehard Bushies in our extended family have decided to vote for Obama.
Posted by: louielouie | May 29, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Nice Job Patriot: I Agree & I heard it loud and clear too !
——–
Obama will raise your taxes (even the middle income).
Hillary stated clearly that she would not raise taxes on the middle income, but only on those who make in excess of $250,000 a year.
Posted by: Sean | May 29, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
It’s incredible and ludicrous to see the vituperation being heaped upon Obama by Hillary supporters and the same being done to a lesser degree in the other direction. Both candidates have said–with conviction– that the differences between them are minimal compared to their differences with McCain, whose differences with Bush are equally minimal. I know it won’t dissuade the angry (and racist-in-denial) element crying for blood, but do we really want another four years of what we have now?
Get off your high horses, people and support the Democrat nominee–whoever that may be. McCain would attack Hillary with equal vigor if she were ahead–which she’s not! So, if you want to cut off your options to spite your country, follow your worst instincts and vote for McCain.
Posted by: herbygee | May 29, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
At least with McCain and Hillary there is a history that I can judge and I know that they love our country. I’m not sure what Obama and his wife think ..
Posted by: susan
I AGREE… AND WE CAN’T TAKE A RECKLESS CHANCE ON OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT.
HILLARY OR MCCAIN…NO OBAMA
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Thanks for your comments TV about blacks – your comments and all the comments made by the obama followers about only the blacks, black elite, white elite and highly educated people vote for obama only makes me darn sure I will never vote for him. Me and about 17million Clinton supporters. Remember, we 17Million are the “typical white persons” that are poor, uneducated, and white senior citizens. We are more in numbers than you eliteists. Keep talking like this and watch the backlash, you will get it right in your face. Amen.
Posted by: Lou | May 29, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Yes DNC thinks that no matter what is said democrates will vote Dem in Nov. Media thinks Woman, Latins, Asians, blue collar workers, the over 65 group and other Hillary supporters will vote dem…that is why they are forcing the issue…but hopefully people will realize Obama is inexperience, a phoney and a hyped up made up candidate and stay the course either do a write in or vote for Mccain in Novemeber..
Posted by: sls | May 29, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Obama or Hilary? Hilary is a pathologic liar who lied about being shot at by snipers so that she can be seen as a hero and the best candidate for president ever she also lie almost of everything coming from her mouth. Barak is definetly a puppet who is being used to save the image of pink “white” America. he will follow the same policies of terrorism the past USA governements are notoriously known for. while i agree Barack is a highly smart Person, him saying things like Hamas is a terrorist organisation clearly show he doesn’t know what real Africa american went throught and still go throught and also the fact the pink “white” terrorist system of government call all people fighting for freedom terrorist. it also call the ANC a terrorist organisation.
Posted by: Hot4real | May 29, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
It is unclear how many of the posters here are genuine; I don’t know if many of you have realized that some of the posters have taken opposing positions in this very blog (as well as on other blogs) without even bothering to change their name. I find it very hard to believe that any rational voter here who supported either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton on the basis of their positions on major issues facing OUR Nation or ability to lead this Nation would easily
switch their votes to John McCain. For those who oppose the continuation of the Iraq war, want a reversal of the economic policy that the Bush administration has enacted over the last 7 years, and/or are pro-choice, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are in agreement on these issue; John McCain is takes the complete opposite position.
Posted by: Laura | May 29, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Trinity Church….spews hate, hate, hate. Big mistake…Obama. Poor judgement. The new tape from Rev. Pfleger who is on Obama’s advisory committee from this past Sunday, continues to link BO to all the wrong people. Pfleger has known BO for many years too.
Rev. Wright must be feeling pretty good about being upstaged…but missing the limelight himself.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
You are delusional if you think all 17 million votes she got were die hard Hillary lovers.
Posted by: BLUE COLLAR FOR OBAMA –
I guess we can use that lame argument against Obama as well.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
All 17 million people who voted for Hillary, will not be voting McCain.
Posted by: BLUE COLLAR FOR OBAMA
EVEN IF ONLY 25% OF HILLARY SUPPORTERS VOTE FOR MCCAIN…THAT’S OVER 4 MILLION VOTES AND THAT WILL MAKE MCCAIN THE PRESIDENT.
HILLARY OR MCCAIN..NO OBAMA.
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Who would have believed the Democrats could lose this election? But then if you read the comments on both sides of this thing, I guess it’s not all that hard to believe after all. And you guys think Bush is dumb. Geeeeeeez.
Posted by: brad | May 29, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Oh so many typos, sorry. So unless you were never truly a supporter of the Democratic platform or are voting for your candidate or against another candidate for a more superficial reason (race, age or gender), it doesn’t seem to make any sense whatsoever to vote for a Republican candidate who most obviously does not represent the Democratic position on these issues.
Posted by: Laura | May 29, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Who would have believed the Democrats could lose this election?
Posted by: brad
THE STUPID DEMOCRAT BOSSES ARE SHOVING OBAMA DOWN OUR THROATS.
HILLARY WOULD HAVE BEEN A EASY WINNER OVER MCCAIN….BUT OBAMA WILL LOSE BIG TIME.
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
The Democratic party is hilarious. No one was complaining when the party initially said that Florida and Michigan would not be counted. How can Hilary Clinton even contemplate counting these votes now? She is such an ego maniac and thought that this year’s election was to just fall in her lap. The truth is that the Clintons are history and over estimate their appeal. America is just plain sick of the both of them.
Posted by: Dreyer | May 29, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
t doesn’t seem to make any sense whatsoever to vote for a Republican candidate who most obviously does not represent the Democratic position on these issues.
Posted by: Laura—-
The problem is that the Democrats do not represent the democratic position. This is not the party that it used to be.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Why do the superdelegates have to be pressured to come forward? If they were all in favor of Obama, as we have been led to believe, they wouldn’t have to be pushed.
What if the majority of them come forward and support Hillary?
HAHAHAHA
Posted by: Karen | May 29, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
It’s almost over! After such a negative campaign, Senator Obama will finally be the nominee. He’s been so honorable, exhibited such character. Sorry, Mrs. Clinton, this is one thing you can’t network and bully your way out of.
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Hilary’s arguing that Michigan and Florida need to count now. She VERBALLY said that she knew that those states would NOT count as A consequence to her violating a rule. She KNEW what she was doing to them and didn’t care about Michigan and Florida then DID SHE?? She didn’t care that they would LOSE THEIR VOICE! She knew what she was doing to them! She used them to service herself! NOW she wants to think about them?? THE HILARY CAMPAIGN SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES AS I AM TO HAVE CONSIDERED VOTING SOMEONE THAT IS WISHY WASHY LIKE THAT INTO THE WHITE HOUSE.
Posted by: For Crying Out Loud | May 29, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
The new pastor means nothing. He is not Obama’s pastor.
Posted by: BLUE COLLAR FOR OBAMA
YES HE IS OBAMA’S NEW PASTOR AND HE IS REV WRIGHT’S PUPIL FOR TWO YEARS AND IS ALSO ANTI-AMERICAN AND ANTI-WHITE.
OBAMA SAID HE WAS A “WONDERFUL” NEW PASTOR
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
It’s almost over! After such a negative campaign, Senator Obama will finally be the nominee. He’s been so honorable, exhibited such character. Sorry, Mrs. Clinton, this is one thing you can’t network and bully your way out of.
Posted by: rainbow68————-
OMG I think I am going to go puke now. Do you also have a tingle going up your leg?
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Blue Collar….I am an Independent and don’t have any particular party loyalty….I vote for who I like. It is usually a Republican, but I did not vote Bush second time. I contributed to Hillary’s campaign and will work for McCain in Sept.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
If the Dems wanted the election for nominee to end in June, they should have the convention in June.
Pelosi and Reid are essentially saying they are changing the rules when they force superdelegates to declare in June.
In addition they are telling superdelegates should not exercise personal judgement going against the pledged delegates. Syperdelegates are free agents, as according to the rules. If they should look to other factors than personal judgement, then why have superdelegates?
Dems are changing the rules to ensure Obama wins. Obama has done this before: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/index.html
Stop to try muscle democracy?
Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 29, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Have you folks looked at the story about the Priest that spoke at Obama’s church. He totally slammed Hillary.
I’m voting for McCain in ’08, not for Obama. Obama will NEVER get my vote.
Posted by: Truth Be Told | May 29, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Dear Jon,
Please don’t puke on my account. No tingle up my leg. Just a silly smile on my face. I feel like the munchkins in “Wizard of Oz” after the house landed on the witch. I’m waiting for her toes to curl up and Glenda to say the coast clear and we can come out now!! Except Glenda’s name is Nancy Pelosi.
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
The Obama campaign is hoping the Rev. Phleger thing will not hurt him….it just reminds us again why we could NEVER VOTE OBAMA. Bad timing before Sat. and Tues. when Hillary will SUSPEND HER CAMPAIGN UNTIL AUGUST….WAIT AND SEE WHAT MORE CRAP STARTS STINKING FROM THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN AND GO TO THE CONVENTION 2 DAYS BEFORE TO MAKE HER APPEAL.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
I wonder if she likes frogs legs?
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Truth be told…it’s all over the media….more classy stuff from Trinity church. I just hope the good people of Montana and S. Dakota tune in. Those are caucus states tho, so the Obamabites will have their terrain staked out anyway. Thank goodness Puerto Rico is voting booth….real accurate, real votes.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
It’s funny in an amusing sense that when people point out Hillary Clinton’s glaring faults and her lack of moral fiber, we are “bashing” her. LOL. There are people who like to bash, true, but then there are others who have open eyes without blinders on who see her for who and what she really is. Please don’t retreat from reality and say those of us who don’t support Clinton are all “bashers.” Many of us just are observant individuals with memories that stretch back beyond a year or so.
Posted by: Lisa Again | May 29, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Did you rabid Hillary shouters read the article? Jeez. Considering how many people are shouting about letting all the voters be heard, it’s like you guys didn’t notice that they’re encouraging the remaining superdelegates to commit AFTER JUNE 3RD. As in, AFTER EVERYBODY HAS VOTED.
And guess what? After everybody has voted, Hillary will still have:
- lost the popular vote
- won fewer pledged delegates
- convinced fewer superdelegates
- polled worse against McCain
- polled far higher negatives than Obama
- raised less money, and from fewer donors
Nobody is trying to “force her out.” What is happening to her is not “getting forced out.” It’s LOSING THE RACE, which is all the more surprising considering the enormous advantages she started with and the incredibly favorable coverage she’s gotten everywhere outside of one evening news show on MSNBC.
Calm down.
Posted by: c_h_t | May 29, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Once again typical white people should vote their conscience. Vote McCain if Obambi is the democratic nominee.
Here is the transcript of a “sermon” by Obamabi’s new pastor (!!):
[[[[[ Pfleger: [Unintelligible] to address the one who says, “Well, don’t hold me responsible (gesticulating) for what my ancestors did. But you have enjoyed the benefits of what your ancestors did and unless you are ready to give up the benefits (voice rising), throw away your 401 fund, throw away your trust fund, throw away all the money you put into the company you WALKED INTO BECAUSE YO’ DADDY AND YO’ GRANDDADDY AND YO’ GREATGRANDDADDY–(screaming at the top of his lungs)–UNLESS YOU’RE WILLING TO GIVE UP THE BENEFITS, THEN YOU MUST BE REPSONSIBLE FOR WHAT WAS DONE IN YOUR GENERATION ‘CUZ YOU ARE THE BENEFICIARY OF THIS INSURANCE POLICY! (Wild gestures, wild applause).
…We must be honest enough to expose white entitlement and supremacy wherever it raises its head.
I said before I don’t want this to be politica because, you know, I’m very unpolitical (mocking tone, huge laughter).
…When Hillary was crying (gesturing tears, uproarious laughter from audience)–and people said that was put on–I really don’t believe it was put on.
I really believe that she just always thought ‘This is mine’ (laughter, hoots). ‘I’m Bill’s wife. I’m WHITE. And this is mine. And I jus’ gotta get up. And step into the plate. And then out of nowhere came, ‘Hey, I’m Barack Obama.’ And she said: ‘Oh, damn!’ WHERE DID YOU COME FROM!?!?! (Crowd going nuts, Pfleger screaming). I’M WHITE! I’M ENTITLED! THERE’S A BLACK MAN STEALING MY SHOW. (SOBS!) SHE WASN’T THE ONLY ONE CRYING! THERE WAS A WHOLE LOTTA WHITE PEOPLE CRYING!
I’m sorry. I don’t wanna get you in any mo’ trouble.]]]]
Posted by: no longer dem | May 29, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
c_h_t
The super delegates do not have to make a decision by next week. That’s what people are upset about.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Ha, ha, as long as we all read the story about Rachael Ray’s black and white scarf today and what a threat she is to national security. I vote that that was the most amusing post on the internet today. I know that has nothing to do with this topic, but admit it, it’s been a wild ride today.
Posted by: Lisa Again | May 29, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Do you guys have any actual problems with Obama, or is quoting people that he knows the best attack you can come up with?
Because it’s the best attack the Republicans have been able to come up with, and it hasn’t worked in months. Why do you think it would work in the general election? Especially if you keep repeating it over and over again now?
Posted by: c_h_t | May 29, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
How long do we have to wait for a nominee? Oh, I’m sorry – for HIllary to “win” the nomination? Somewhere, McCain is laughing himself to sleep and waking himself up laughing. Is this what we really want?
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
That said: There are many misrepresentations of facts in the posts on this blog. First, the 40 member Price-Herman Committee, (selected by then DNC-chair Terry McAuliffe and current Hillary Clinton campaign co-chair) and co-chairs U.S Labor Secretary Alexis Herman and U.S. Senate Rep David E. Price(appointed by then DNC-chair Terry McAuliffe and current Hillary clinton campaign co-chair) worked through the changes to the 2008 DNC primary schedule requested by Sen. Carl Levine (MI) and DNC member Debbie Dingell (MI). They met over an 18-month period to determine the DNC schedule and the rules regarding the penalties for those states who didn’t abide by the DNC schedule that was voted for with almost unanimous approval on Aug/19/2006. (Well before any one knew who would be the frontrunner in the Democratic Party nomination). During this 18-month period Party candidates, Party representatives, labor leaders and others were able to attend and make their views known at atleast 5 -6 public meetings. Second, party Presidential primaries are not addressed in the U.S. Constitution; only General elections and primaries for state officials.The DNC and RNC who also reduced the awarded delegates for states who moved up primaries (or caucases) in violation of their rules are well within their rights to penalize state parties for breaking the rules ( This has been ruled upon by several courts as not “unconstitutional”; and not under the scope of the Constitution)Third, Kathleen Sullivan (NH)(Hillary superdelegate) at that same Aug 19 2006 DNC schedule vote stated (after acknowledging President Bill Clinton’s birthday) that President Bill Clinton and Senator Hillary Clinton supported her state’s position against early primaries and caucases; she stated that “front-loading” the primaries would be detrimental to the party, would “disenfranchise” voters in later primaries since everyone knew that “the nominee will be picked by the end of January” if the DNC allowed states other than Iowa and New Hampshire to vote before the Feb 5 2008 “window”( Kathleen Sullivan and NH was very explicit that they opposed Michigan’s original plan to move up their primary before the “window”. Fourth, Stephanie Tubbs- Jones(another Hillary superdelegate) stated that Kathleen Sullivan’s position was not supportable as the Price-Herman committee and the Dem RBC deliberated carefully over the rules that the 2008 DNC schedule and the penalties for violating such should be approved.As someone else has pointed out Harold Ickes (Hillary supporter) also supported these decisions. These are facts.Do those who support a conspiracy theory propose that Hillary clinton’s own supporters and endorsers are a party to this conspiracy?
Posted by: Laura | May 29, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
J: Sure, they don’t have to. But why would they wait? Everybody will have voted by then, and the longer this drags out, the angrier both sides get at each other. Just read the comments Democrats are making about Barack in here. Could you imagine two sides of the same party being so angry at each other, back in January?
The most important thing to remember is that Hillary and Barack BARELY differ from each other on policy. McCain is the POLAR OPPOSITE of them.
Just think of how bad the past 8 years have been. Is it worth voting for 4-8 more, just to spite a Democratic candidate? More billions of dollars and thousands of lives in Iraq. More tax cuts for the richest people in America. Help for the banks that caused this mortgage fiasco and none for the homeowners who are going broke. No action on the environmental crisis. Stacking a Supreme Court to rule that abortion is unconstitutional, and whatever else the Republicans want for another 50 years.
Is it really worth it? Because one candidate almost exactly like the one you prefer may win the nomination?
Posted by: c_h_t | May 29, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
The new pastor means nothing. He is not Obama’s pastor.
Posted by: BLUE COLLAR FOR OBAMA
YES HE IS OBAMA’S NEW PASTOR AND HE IS REV WRIGHT’S PUPIL FOR TWO YEARS AND IS ALSO ANTI-AMERICAN AND ANTI-WHITE.
OBAMA SAID HE WAS A “WONDERFUL” NEW PASTOR
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
FROGS – It ain’t easy being green!
Posted by: c_h_t | May 29, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
John Pen – is the pastor running for President?
If not, why does something he said matter?
Moreover, why does something HE said affect whether or not to vote for somebody completely different?
Posted by: c_h_t | May 29, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Who would have believed the Democrats could lose this election?
Posted by: brad
THE STUPID DEMOCRAT BOSSES ARE SHOVING OBAMA DOWN OUR THROATS.
HILLARY WOULD HAVE BEEN A EASY WINNER OVER MCCAIN….BUT OBAMA WILL LOSE BIG TIME.
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Did I miss something? The meaning of all this frog stuff escapes me. Was that a news story today?
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
c_h_t
I don’t trust Obama. There are too many unanswered questions regarding him. I guess we will find out what those questions are before the November election.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
c_h_t : we aren’t really doing it to spite a candidate. It is really to spite some of the people on here who call others stupid or kiss my booty or try in their way to act superior. We can’t attack the ones who really get our gander up, so Obama is the only real one to direct that anger at.
Posted by: tired | May 29, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Patriot:
That’s why you would vote for McCain over Obama, if Clinton isn’t the nominee? Tax policy?
By my understanding, there are vanishingly small differences between Clinton and Obama’s tax policies.
Who benefits the most, depends on how you define middle-class.
Still, both offer tax-relief to middle-class (and poor) working Americans. They just do it in different ways.
Note: the impact of government spending on America’s poor and middle-class workers is not only influenced by tax-policy, but by a host of other factors: health care policy, defense spending, government subsidies to education etc, etc.
As to McCain’s tax proposals? Yeah, he has promised NO NEW TAXES, while admitting he doesn’t really know the first thing about the economy.
Theoretically, a promise of no new taxes should mean no new taxes for the middle class, right?
I guess if the question that moves you most in this election is how you IMAGINE the respective candidates proposals regarding tax policy will effect the middle class, then McCain should be your man.
Why bother with Clinton at all? I say IMAGINE, because who really knows.
Can McCain even hope to deliver on his promise of no new taxes? Is it even remotely possible that he can deliver on such a promise?
Remember what happened when George Bush, Sr. asked us to read his lips, and then declared “No New Taxes”?
Finally: I’m no expert on matters of tax-policy, but the experts I’ve read, seem to agree universally that NONE of the candidates, not McCain, not Clinton, not Obama, can hope to pass their proposed tax policies as currently stated.
Since McCain’s strikes me as the most irresponible of the bunch (permanent tax cuts to the rich, pie-in-the sky promises of no new taxes), I place my bets on one of the other two.
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
the Super Delegates are the ones who are picked to “Save” the party in case of…what ever. Their votes are meant to reflect what is best for the Party of the People. Once all the votes are counted the supers have no reason to wait. Every vote counted, every delegate counted, its decided. May the best man win.
Posted by: oldwhiteguy | May 29, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
When it’s all said and done, if the Democratic party doesn’t unite soon, it will be doomed this November.
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
tired: What you said makes sense, but be careful. If McCain wins in the general election, you may have ended up punishing yourself and everyone else!
Posted by: c_h_t | May 29, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
“Their votes are meant to reflect what is best for the Party of the People.”
“May the best man win.”
oldwhiteguy—-
In that case they should go with Hillary. May the best woman win.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
OBAMA, CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!
BLACKS, ASIANS, HISPANICS, WHITES, OLDER PEOPLE, YOUNG PEOPLE, POOR PEOPLE, RICH PEOPLE, RELIGIOUS PEOPLE, ATHIESTS, BUSINESS PEOPLE, EDUCATED PEOPLE, POOR PEOPLE, WOMEN and MEN VOTED FOR YOUR TO WIN THE NOMIANTION.
OBAMA ’09 plus 8!
YES WE CAN!!!!!
Posted by: United We Stand | May 29, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Some more facts the founders of OUR Nation did not form a direct democracy; they expressly provided for a Republic or representative democracy (elected representatives, delegates and electors)
so that by virtue of a “simple” majority
(say a large populous state) could not exert dominion over a smaller, less populous state. They also intended three equally matched branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) and preferred “deadlock” to one of the branches acquiring more power and running over the other 2 branches.They expressly did not want either a autocracy(monarchy, oligarchy etc) or mob rule (I can scream and threaten louder than you). Both the Republican and Democratic Parties are based on the model of representational democracy.
Posted by: Laura | May 29, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
The media and the democratic leaders pushed Obama but I say no thank you I will vote McCain .
Posted by: Bishop | May 29, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Another tidbit: The original MI primary was an OPEN primary; meaning you did not need to belong to a particular party (nor did you need to switch political parties) to vote for any candidate in the primary.
So independents,republicans and democrats were free to vote for any candidate. Many independenta and republicans as well as democrats have indicated a preference for Barack Obama over John McCain or Hillary Clinton. When Hillary Clinton proposed a revote of the MI primary if she couldn’t get the unsanctioned vote awarded to her, she was only willing to revote the portion of the MI primary vote who were registered democrats and who could certify that they had not voted on another ballot (republican, independent etc.) So it would have been a CLOSED primary but even more restrictive as some democrats would have also been “disenfranchised”. This would not have been a re-vote but a selective re-vote.
Posted by: Laura | May 29, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
tired,
everybody reacts emotionally when the stakes are so high. the polls show that obama gets the educated votes. but, you know in your heart of hearts that true democrats are the people that have compassion for others and want EVERYBODY to have the chance to succeed.
that’s one reason it is so important to recognize the affordability of education. it is the path that opens doors for us and our children. education became a farce over the past 8 years under bush and definitely needs to change.
that’s what obama plans to do — change this country’s warped agenda that has forgotten that people CAN thrive if given a chance.
please don’t let heated comments hurt your feelings. many people are just reacting to the attacks of the limbaugh lovers posing as hard-core clinton supporters.
obama 08!
Posted by: heated-no-so-much | May 29, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Ralph, the question to HRC was why are you still in the race. She used the RFK assination remark as a reason why. As if to say, anything could happen. If you really want to talk about unforgiveness, you need to spin that at your girl Hillary. WHY IN THE WORLD would she even bring up anything with the word “assination” in it? Hillary is not STUPID! She knew ACTUALLY what she was doing, what she was saying and what she was implying. You can get mad all you want too. Stay in a corner for all I care. But when a “so called” leader introduces the thought of something happening as awful as that…It shows me her dark side. She is praying for something, anything, to happen. And that is who YOU want to run our country? She is the “better” candidate? Whatever.
Posted by: Brenda | May 29, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Brenda,
She implied no such thing. She was stating that the race went to June and he was then assassinated. If you are going to bash her at least learn how to spell the word you are accusing her of implying. Did she mention Obama, No.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Watch this You Tube video which shows another one of Obama’s peace loving reverends- Rev Flegler. The video is titled-Obama’s church:Hillary Cried Because White Supremacy Failed.
Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 29, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
reid, pelosi,and dean just prove idiots are in charge of the democratic party.
Posted by: Beau | May 29, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Rumors that Hillary will suspend her campaign…does not need to endorse Obama…sit back until August and go to Denver a couple of days early to appeal. Sounds like a plan, since every week Obama has a gaffe or a radical flying out of his closet. Suspend til the end Hillary!!!!! Supers do not vote until August and can change their minds right up until the convention.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Taking all available evidence into consideration, there’s no reason to think that Obama will fare worse than Clinton would against McCain. Whatever the motive Clinton has for pushing the Florida/Michigan business, it is presumably not to win the nomination, since she would lose the nomination even if all the FL/MI delegates were to be counted (which is not going to happen anyway, and for rather good reasons). Maybe she’s angling for the veep slot, as some have suggested. But one thing’s for sure: by drawing out the nomination — and the undeclared Congressional superdelegates are deeply complicit in this — she is hurting Obama’s chances in the general election. The guy needs a rest to gear up for the big battle ahead. He is also losing precious time to make the obligatory hard turn to center, and to give Clinton’s supporters time to heal and maybe give Obama a second look, unobscured by the fog of internicine political conflict. The extended nomination has already hurt the Democrats chances at the White House. If Reid and Co. can’t figure a way to wrap the thing up very soon, McCain may well win in a landslide.
Posted by: rockefeller republican | May 29, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Why couldn’t the first viable black candidate to run for Prez or VP have been Colin or Condi…they are more “acceptable” to whites….no controversy white hating rhetoric surrounding them….everybody would be happy. Just too bad they had to push Obama through the system (bundling money into his campaign from Soros and the other billionaire leftys). Cannot buy thyself a President to push your own agenda. The people will decide..if not Hillary then McCain. People vote who they like more than policies…bottom line.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Colin Powell and Condi Rice I wouldn’t have a problem voting for at least I know they love this country. Both are intelligent and articulate.
Posted by: J | May 29, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Democratic leaders can try all the want, but its pretty clear Clinton will disrupt things in any way she sees possible.
I was slow to embrace this theory, but its hard to accept any alternative theory to her wanting a divided party so that maybe, just maybe, she can be the one to reunite it in 2012.
Posted by: Paul | May 29, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Just too bad they had to push Obama through the system (bundling money into his campaign from Soros and the other billionaire leftys). Cannot buy thyself a President to push your own agenda. The people will decide..if not Hillary then McCain. People vote who they like more than policies…bottom line.
Posted by: Debra
THEY ARE TRYING TO SHOVE OBAMA DOWN OUR THROATS.
HILLARY FIRST..IF NOT MCCAIN…NO OBAMA
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
oba mad, maybe you can help me out with something. I’m an Asian American who thinks like an African who believes he’s a soccer mom who is unsure about her sexual orientation but tends to lean Democrat except when the Libertarian candidate comes out real strong against clubbing baby seals. Please tell me how I should vote.
Posted by: rockefeller republican | May 29, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
These party elders needs to back off! We have witnessed these party elders have bullied SDs and Hillary again and again.
From this website and poll data, most Americans do not think the race is over. Are we in a third world country? Now it is the time for us to defend our democracy system, which we have been so proud of!
Posted by: JP | May 29, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
hey j
how can you trust Hillary?
she is power hungry and has another
agenda and it does not include the
citizen’s of our country..just her..
it is the CLINTON way,and when you’re
behind in a race you kick em ,bite em
and then you redo the math.the CLINTONS
have LIED and CHEATED, and act as if
everything that they say or do is some
form of gold i should treasure.also i
am not real up on the idea of having
BILL wandering around the WHITEHOUSE
again,he has been known to lie and has
difficulty keeping his pants up.
HILLARY is so grandiose,she thought
had it in the bag.. only her bag seems
to have a hole in it….
Posted by: weldon | May 29, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Rockefeller Repub – I’m confused. I thought legalized clubbing of baby seals was part of the LP platform.
Posted by: Paul | May 29, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
At least with McCain and Hillary there is a history that I can judge and I know that they love our country. I’m not sure what Obama and his wife think ..
Posted by: susan
I AGREE… AND WE CAN’T TAKE A RECKLESS CHANCE ON OBAMA TO BE PRESIDENT.
HILLARY OR MCCAIN…NO OBAMA
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
One thing I have been puzzling is where Obama’s contributions come from? The amount is way out of proportions compared with Hillary and McCain. I don’t believe blacks and college kids all maxed out. Has any news media looked into this? There have been too many Oops about Obama.
Posted by: John | May 29, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
The Clintons have not destroyed the party. The democratic party bosses have a system that has done it for them. I was proud to be a democrat but not anymore. At least the republicans have convictions and fight for their beliefs. The democrats just want to fight to pull each other down. Who would have thought that they would want to put up the most unelectable candidate in the face of a definite win. But only the democrats know how to do this. They have been doing this since 2000.
Posted by: Voter | May 29, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
John – you asked if anyone has looked into Obama’s fundraising. The single best answer is everyone has looked into it.
Even opposing candidates, out of envy. His per-donor amount is the lowest of the remaining three, but his number of donors are simply incredible by past standards.
And every donor is known and reported to the FEC (except maybe those who don’t meet a certain dollar amount, but I don’t even know what that limit is).
Posted by: Paul | May 29, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Hillary will suspend her campaign next week and take it to Denver two days before the convention and appeal to the super dels….alot can come flying out of BO’s closet before then and many gaffes. Suspend til the end.
Posted by: Debra | May 29, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Reasons to vote Clinton or McCain over Obama = Taxes, Taxes, Taxes.
Obama has said that he will support payroll taxes and capital gains taxes. These two together will literally sink our economy. This man does not understand economic policy period!
Posted by: Voter | May 29, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Twixt B and D,
And T and V,
We catch a glimpse of Hillary,
Twixt M and O,
And S and U,
The rest of her comes into view.
Posted by: political poet | May 29, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Who is trying to push Obama down our throats. And please don’t say the MSM. He is a formidable canidate and half the country supports him.
Posted by: erin | May 29, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Gallup Poll: Clinton Stronger in Swing States
Gallup Poll: “In the 20 states where Hillary Clinton has claimed victory in the 2008 Democratic primary and caucus elections (winning the popular vote), she has led John McCain in Gallup Poll Daily trial heats for the general election over the past two weeks of Gallup Poll Daily tracking by 50% to 43%. In those same states, Barack Obama is about tied with McCain among national registered voters, 45% to 46%.”
Posted by: America First | May 29, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
HAHAHAHAHAH This is funny………….The Democrat Party ELITES HAVE SPOKEN…… The Hillary supporters will SHUT up and sit down…………, Nancy and Harry will DECIDE who will get the nomination – - – - – Guess the Democratic Leaders really DONT believe in Democracy in their own party…….apparently You rank and file Democrats aren’t intelligent enough to elect a candidate. sooooo the “SUPER” delegates will decide………….
Posted by: Vet1973 | May 29, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
One thing I have been puzzling is where Obama’s contributions come from? The amount is way out of proportions compared with Hillary and McCain. I don’t believe blacks and college kids all maxed out. Has any news media looked into this? There have been too many Oops about Obama.
Posted by: John
I AGREE. OBAMA HAS OVER $200 MILLION IN DONATIONS…THAT’S OUTRAGEOUS FOR A GUY NOBODY EVER HEARD OF A FEW MONTHS AGO.
WONDER WHERE ALL THAT MONEY IS REALLY COMING FROM.
Posted by: John Pen | May 29, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
By the way, the word “Obamination” is what the newspaper which is extremely conservative calls Obama. So if you see that name calling, it comes from the ULTRA conservative ranks.
Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 29, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Nancy and Harry back off!!! You are not only disgrace to Democratic Party, but also destroying this party!
Posted by: Peter | May 29, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
I think we can take great pleasure in stomping the arrogant empty suit BO and his fanatics. We have heard so many hateful personal insults from their campaign.
The BO campaign has no position but borrow entirely from Hillary; the difference is he has no specifics and gaffe every time showing off his 089knowledge. He and his campaign has no position but only hateful remarks about opponents. He borrows straightly from Bush’s playbook. He is just another Bush.
The Republicans has their Bush. The Democrates has BO.
We should never stay home in November. It’s pay time for us. Let’s crush that SOBerheaded. Revenge is sweet for those who called us uneducated.
Wouldn’t you be delighted to see that SOBerheaded begging for your vote and getting none. It makes our day. Wouldn’t you be happy to see Jimmy the Carter go nuts, Pelosi banana, and Howard Dean’s face smashed against the wall hopelessly in a landslide loss. Yes, we can.
JFK and Robert Kennedy has never duck debate and fights. They win it with great effort with guts and tenacity. This SOBerhead BO is simply not the caliber. He is just a con with highflying bambastic lies. There is no record of him being a reformer. He just rides the tail of others and steals credit that he did not deserve. Make him cry.
08 Nobama
Posted by: John_Lai | May 29, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Doing things for spite can get us into a war with Iran. Be very afraid to vote for a Republican who ONLY knows war in his life.
Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 29, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
It is revolting to see how these leaders such as Pelosi only care about themselves instead of listening to the people. Yes, ignore the 17M, and no matter how many months they get, they will still loose.
Posted by: vote4thebest | May 29, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I’ve been gone a couple of hours and am appalled by what I’m reading! You’re ready to throw over the party if Hillary is not the nominee? If she doesn’t get out of the race next week and support Senator Obama, he will be hamstrung all summer and may never get his traction. After the Democratic convention, which by all accounts may be very divisive and destructive, there will not be enough time to unite against McCain! Enough of the spite!
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
It’s not a matter of “ignoring the 17 million”. Even if Senator Obama wins with “only” 17,000,001, he still wins. Nobody’s being disenfranchised, he just won.
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Think of the venoms and insults that the BO fanatics thrown to us.
Think of the party pundits rigging the election, making up new rules, tampering voters choices, and moving goal posts.
Think of the value of an undemocratic Democratic Party. It’s time to stand up for the principle that nothing is above: For the people, of the people and by the people. Throw those SOBerheaded politician out of the posts. Yes we can. Vote for the republicans and then the long quested reforms of the party will start.
Hell no; we should not support the party that despised you, screws you and dictate over your choices.
Yes, we can. Vote for McCain.
Then BO, Pelosi, Dean, Joe Andrew and the sort will weep for their despicable fixation in politics. It sounds so sweet.
08 Nobama.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 29, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
To John_Lai:
I really don’t get it. Hillary has lost the nomination under the terms she agreed to. But to run screaming in the night yelling, “McCain 08″ is a surprising, over the top reaction. I’m stunned.
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
The most insidious sexism comes from that BO fanatics who told us:
May the best man win.
Let’s make this SOBerheaded fanatics weep in November.
08 Nobama.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 29, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
John_Lai:
Are you from Michigan or Florida that you feel disenfranchised?
I am from Michigan. I did not vote in the first primary – I was led to believe it wouldn’t count. At the time, to be honest, I would have voted for Clinton, though.
I’ve since changed my mind, I now prefer Obama – despite reservations.
Still, I don’t really understand the hysteria from some quarters regarding the seating of MI & FL delegates.
Clinton is just trying to put the best face on her loss. Even if they are seated, it won’t put her ahead, so its highly unlikely superdelegates will give her the nomination.
I also don’t understand the back-and-forth between rival camps as to who has the best chances against McCain in November. Polls clearly show either Obama or Clinton can beat McCain. In any event, arguing based on polls this far in advance is just speculation.
Finally, why is the fact that Clinton wants to fight as hard as possible, using every argument at her disposal – both good and specious – seen as divisive?
She’s making an argument! An argument I (and I suspect most super delegates) don’t find convincing but still, what’s the harm?
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
I don’t think it was insidious sexism. It was tongue in cheek, that’s all.
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
We are so divided… and if everyone would be truthful about this primary. Hillary brought it on.
1. First, Black against White with Wright.
2. Patriotism, the flag pin wear or not wear. (real stupid)
3. Young against the old.
4. White working class against everybody else.
5. Sexism:Old age Women against the Men.
6. better candidate because of polls.
(the joke of all jokes)
Her whining, divisiness, crying foul, using the race, sexism and I didn’t sign that about the voters did I? is just too much. Enough please. Superdelegates put her and us out of this terrible misery.
Posted by: nottoblame | May 29, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
The flag lapel pin issue is the lamest ever.
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
The party does not play by the rules. We have pundits like Pelosi misinform us about the rights of superdelegates. Why should the party ever have superdelegates? If the purpose of having an elite class of delegates, we should tear apart this undemocratic party.
Fact:
Washingon primary
6 point win for BO
Washington caucus
37 point win for BO
Texas primary
4 point win for Hillary
Texas caucus
12 point loss for Hillary
The party, the pundits, the BO fanatics cheat and deny the equal rights of voters.
Adapted from Animal Farm:
All voters are equal except some voters are more equal than the others.
The venoms, the fabricated credentials, the race card, the smearing in SD from BO and company areall very personal. Let’s get the record straight. For real change, we need to hold the party responsible for their wrong doing.
We should never vote for an undemocratic Democratic Party. Make them weep for their arrogance and contemptible behavior over people.
08 McCain; Nobama for real CHANGE;
Yes, WE CAN.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 29, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
I AM A WHITE WORKING CLASS MAN FROM KENTUCKY AND I AM PROUD THAT OBAMA WILL BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT! HE WILL CHANGE THE WORLD FOR THE GOOD OF ALL WOMEN AND MEN! I NOW, ONCE AGAIN, BELIEVE IN THE SYSTEM.
Posted by: bill | May 29, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
nottoblame:
I don’t see how one can charge Clinton with having CREATED these divisions. Maybe she’s to be faulted for drawing them out.
She certainly isn’t at fault for the Wright controversy, Obama (with a not-so-gentle assist from the editing team at FOX news) brought that on himself.
Ditto for the flag-pin
As for dividing young against old, white working class against everyone else [sic], old-age [sic] women against men? Some of those divisions are to be expected. She really didn’t have to gin anything up.
Obama has been consistently getting more than 90% of the African-American vote, he gets the vote of the white professional class, of men, the young – is he then at fault for creating these divisions?
Better candidate because of the polls? I agree, that is a pretty weak argument, considering how poorly polls have served her. Remember how at the beginning of the primary polls showed her the clear winner?
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
“he spoke this morning with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and last night to DNC Chairman Howard Dean. “We agree there won’t be a fight at the convention,” he said, later adding that “simple math indicates” Barack Obama is likely to become the Democratic nominee.”
Why did any of us bother to research the candidates and vote in this corrupt primary! These guys are nothing but a gang of thugs, using their power to pressure superdelegates to “crown” the candidate they support.
Posted by: LJC | May 29, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
So if Senator Clinton doesn’t get the nomination, we slash and burn the party? How will you feel on election night watching President McCain accepting his win? (Assuming he’s still up that late.)
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
a VOTE for McCain triggers a long overdued real reform of the undemocratic Democratic Party.
YES, WE CAN.
08 McCain; Nobama.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 29, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
There will be 3 supreme court vacancies soon. If the party doesn’t unite behind a candidate soon, the repurcussions will last for decades.
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
THE CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS HAVE A LOWER APPROVAL RATING THEN BUSH LOL 16% AND THEY WILL PICK THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES??????????????????
Posted by: Really | May 29, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Stay home and take care of the babies Sweetie
Posted by: joker4usa | May 29, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
John_Lai:
A vote for McCain triggers…
Well, I hate to think what it might trigger – war with Iran comes to mind, another 100 years war in Iraq, seems likely.
Or on another front:
A vote for McCain triggers…
economic recession, the revocation of Roe v. Wade, the further collapse of our health care system.
I could go on;-)
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
rainbow68,
seniors will not vote for Obama and I think a lot of these bloggers here for Hillary are seniors, not all but most. And unfortunately they don’t seem to care about the supreme court like the rest of us do. I have posted to people that if you don’t like Obama then just vote him out in 4 years. But the justices are appointed for life. They either don’t get it or don’t care about the next generation.
Posted by: lisa | May 29, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
And the Clintons have had no unsavory friendships?
Posted by: rainbow68 | May 29, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Really:
I really do wonder why anyone mentions the low ratings of Congress, an institution notoriously fractious, tied up by the competing political agendas of different regions and parties, and slow to move – BY CONSITUTIONAL DESIGN.
The question is not what people think of Congress as a whole, but what they think of their personal representative.
I think people, on the whole, are happy with their individual representatives (at least if their Democrats). Its the institution of Congress, and its ineffectiveness, people find frustrating.
BTW: The presidency is different, he pretty much acts alone, and he could hardly be less popular.
Posted by: Fact Checker | May 29, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
The seniors fought for you gen X,Y And Zers. The seniors shed thier blood , lost thier sons, brothers , fathers , mothers and daughters for you. The Seniors sacrificed soo much for the freedoms you take for granted. SHAME ON YOU
Posted by: joker4usa | May 29, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
joker4usa,
and our youth are in Iraq. They can’t drink but they can go to war and die for us. Shame on you if you vote McCain. The next generation have a say in this election whether you like it or not.
Posted by: lisa | May 29, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Posted by sandra: “The guy will have to continually fight to keep the Clintons supporters from defecting”
He cannot keep voters [he never had] from defecting! As difficult as it may be for many Obama supporters, or Obama himself to accept, there are a vast number of Democrats who will never vote for him. He cannot win.
Posted by: LJC | May 29, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
I’m part of that youth 11B US INFANTRY what , you got some time in the barrel tell us. I respect my elders I love my country I put it out as best I could like the generations before me what you got?
Posted by: joker4usa | May 29, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
jokerusa,
I have 2 kids in college that I don’t want drafted in a war we shouldn’t be in. McCain will reinstate the draft because our troops are tired and no one is enlisting anymore. And he is hell bent on winning in Iraq. We can’t win, it’s a civil war there. We couldn’t win vietnam either. We need to get out now before more lives are lost.
Posted by: lisa | May 29, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Doesnt’ ANYONE remember when Clinton was getting more of the Black vote? Before Obama’s campaign played the race card?
Watch this and decide for yourself. Look at what Michelle says…look at what Obama has in one of his books about race baiting.
How anyone can think that the Clinton’s are racist or that her campaign brought race into this is beyond me.
What people need to do is to look up how Obama got into politics in the first place…the down and dirty of it all. But wait…he claims to be a different kind of politician…yeah right…
http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/thats-just-how-white-folks-will-do-you/
Posted by: michelle | May 29, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Lisa..
give me the sources of your information about McCain reinstating the draft. You spout such nonsense. The military are offering more and more for new enlistees.
You are filled with rhetoric…
I am an American first and Democrat second. I trust McCain’s judgment on what do to in Iraq 100x more than Obama and will vote accordingly. Even Obama said it would be 5 years before we get out.
As for lives being lost…my family has been in the military for generations. When they are called for duty they go..no matter what the reason. They don’t complain about it.
Nobody will scare me into voting for Obama…in fact Obama scares me enough not to.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 29, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Raleigh Voter,
I am not trying to scare anyone to vote for Obama. In fact I will vote for a dem no matter what. I am just tired of this hatred from Hillary supporters.
The military is hurting, where have you been. They call my kids once a week trying to get them to enlist. I thank your family for being in the military and protecting us but I don’t want it for my kids and they don’t want it either. This war is insane and we need to get out. McCain wants us to stay until we win. But we can’t win because it’s a civil war now that the republicans created. Go ahead vote for McCain. Mark my words, the draft is next because these kids don’t want to go to war and are not enlisting.
Posted by: lisa | May 29, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
staniam…lol…I have lived in many states being a military brat
The deal is…McCain is no Bush.
I have always voted Dem in the Presidential election…except once going for the third party candidate.
I think the dems are moving too far left. And with Pelosi and Dean acting like they own it…I am even more dismayed.
If the dems can’t pick a candidate that they can convince enough of their OWN party members to vote for, well don’t blame Clinton.
I doubt she will take it to the convention, but I for one would like to see it, just to stick it to the ultra left liberals. Cause right now, they can kiss my a@@ along with 1/2 of their party for being so freaking stupid!
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Let me help you out, It is’nt McCain you should fear it’s every one until we shake our need for unstable oil. Canada has a oilsands program , but there again political retoric with NAFTA has cornered Obama
Expect more from leaders because the will ask more from you.
They will go no matter who gets elected, too many volunteers have already done the time. Unless you are willing to reverse your own principles and force them to go back in battle abroad. The Nations needs come first. Where is the call for engineers??
Q: Do you think women should register for selective service when they turn 18 like men do currently?
A: You know, a while back we had a celebration in the Capitol for the Tuskegee Airmen, and it was extraordinarily powerful because it reminded us, there was a time when African-Americans weren’t allowed to serve in combat. And yet, when they did, not only did they perform brilliantly, but what also happened is they helped to change America, and they helped to underscore that we’re equal. And I think that if women are registered for service–not necessarily in combat roles, and I don’t agree with the draft– I think it will help to send a message to my two daughters that they’ve got obligations to this great country as well as boys do.
Source: 2007 xxxTube Democratic Primary debate, Charleston SC Jul 23, 2007
Posted by: joker4usa | May 30, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
I want Hillary to fight on the convention floor! Stand up for true Democracy! Hillary don’t give up! Don’t let them marginalize you!
Posted by: Susan Erickson | May 30, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Sorry Lisa…even though McCain uses the term “win” that is not exactly what he means.
I strongly feel that the country needs to be stable, especially with Iran being right there. I believe that we can end it once they are self-sufficient. We created this new chaos and it is our responsibility to end it.
Do you REALLY believe that a Dem is going to get us out of there any sooner and that McCain, a brave veteran, is a warmonger? It is all just political pandering. Even Obama says 5 years. I trust Clinton and McCain to get us out the right way. It’s not that I don’t believe that Obama could do the same, but for me, this election is more than about the war or abortion or supreme court justices. Our economy is at stake too. Our national debt is like nothing in history. I want someone will experience, with sound judgment and with past actions to back that up.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
staniam, I can say what I want. Sorry, if you don’t agree, that’s life.
Posted by: lisa | May 30, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
to Susan Erickson: with chicken brains You better want to go to work and take crae of Your own business , Your family, Your man.
We should protect America from Dirty clintons.
Forever.
Posted by: Linda,Fl | May 30, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Protect America from the dirty Clintons…LOL!!
If I am not mistaken, when Bill was in office we had a national surplus.
And as far as dirty goes…just look at Obama’s political past…now that’s frightening. Of course it wouldn’t bother me so much…its just politics…had his campaign not been all about “change”.
Obama = hypocrite
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Raleigh Voter, McCain said he knew nothing about the economy. And we are going to trust him with this. No thanks. My family is hurting.
Posted by: lisa | May 30, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Posted by J: “was reading an article the other day that the DNC does not have all the money needed to put the convention on. Maybe Obambi can cough up some of his money.”
He already made his down payment on the DNC about 10 days ago.
Posted by: LJC | May 30, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Sorry Frogs..
Its not about losing or winning…it is about the future of our country.
This is why so many Dems will just not vote for Obama.
When people even use the terms about winning/losing, then I know that they are misguided and do not really understand how those who disagree with them really feel or how they are thinking.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
staniam, do tell me about Obama’s dirty money and I will tell you about Clinton’s. This is ridiculous. They are both dems and deserve our respect. I will gladly vote for either one.
Posted by: lisa | May 30, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
sta…here is that post…I have pages of Obama stuff…
The Obama spend-o-meter is now up around $800 billion. And tax hikes on the rich won’t pay for it. It’s the middle class that will ultimately shoulder this fiscal burden in terms of higher taxes and lower growth.
The Wall Street Journal’s Steve Moore has done the math on Obama’s tax plan. He says it will add up to a 39.6 percent personal income tax, a 52.2 percent combined income and payroll tax, a 28 percent capital-gains tax, a 39.6 percent dividends tax, and a 55 percent estate tax.
Not only is Obama the big-spending candidate, he’s also the very-high-tax candidate. And what he wants to tax is capital.
Doesn’t Obama understand the vital role of capital formation in creating businesses and jobs? Doesn’t he understand that without capital, businesses can’t expand their operations and hire more workers
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
This is a good site…
it is a story about why nevada and sc were allowed to move up their primary…
regardless what people want to believe…this was all well planned and thought out…I won’t go as far as a conspiracy but it makes you wonder what the DNC is thinking with their “rules”.
While they are a private “company” and can elect to choose the Dem nominee however they want, it just seems wrong that the people do not have more of a say in who our President will be.
http://www.wmnf.org/news_stories/5617
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
What we need are MANY political parties…then they will be forced to work together.
You must admit that it is fundamentally unfair to Americans that we have such little choice. We are lucky enough to get to elect “elite” people to lead.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
staniam, so are you calling me a fool now, why so.
Posted by: lisa | May 30, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Lisa..
there is a lot out there about Obama and who he has paid back favors to. As well as who he has received money from. 1/2 of his campaign money has actually come from grassroots efforts, the other has come from big business bundlers. In fact he has received almost 2 million from CNN/Time Warner.
You just need to go to one of the anti-Obama websites
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
clarity is what is needed.
“Rangel and his fourteen Democratic colleagues who sponsored this legislation did so to make some kind of political point,” said Rep. Chip Pickering, Republican of Mississippi’s Third Congressional District. “But they created fear and gave weight to false rumors that have disturbed many of us in Congress and more unfortunately many Americans across the country. Tonight we overwhelmingly defeated this measure to assure the American public that the draft is not coming back and that we will not allow the politics of fear to rule in the United States Congress.”
good golly the economy , well Obama has 6 months to convince the US that he is’nt in bed with special intrests. It going to be tough considering David Axelrod his manager is a lobbyist on leave at the moment. The Resko trial is also going to play a factor, not to many folks can get a house for 300K under its value.
Posted by: joker4usa | May 30, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Lisa–Staniam,
Staniam knows what he is talking about. He always writes well before he thinks. His are the most uninformed posts I have ever seen.
I particularly enjoy his commentary that we have no authority and his commands to cease and desist and go away.
I think staniam is maybe 13 and going through a tough puberty.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Sorry Hello…
I do not see it and I have read many of staniam’s posts and do not find them uninformed…in fact it is quite the opposite.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Raleigh Voter, who cares. Let’s look at Hillary’s record.
Posted by: lisa | May 30, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Raleigh voter–
I have read your posts, I am not surprised you are a fan of staniam.
Do you also approve of his condescending orders for people to shut up and go away?
I can appreciate people who have a difference of opinion and who simply state their position. He goes way beyond that.
If you are secure in your own position, you don’t need to tell your opposition to shut up. Open discourse is the key to a successful democracy.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
I know everything about Hillary Clinton, the good and bad so there is nothing that is news to me. I have researched all three of them and pride myself on making an informed decision.
I have always voted based on party with not much thought. This election has opened up my eyes and make me realize that it is up to me to search for the facts, rather than to just listen to what the media tells me.
I am pretty much right in the middle of the political spectrum.
Hello…I see that sta replies to ignorant people that way. I do not follow one persons blogs continuously so I cannot speak for everything, but from what I have seen, sta’s points have made sense.
I have seen far too many posts bashing Clinton than any other. I follow them on various sites and it is sad. I see numerous of them from younger voters who really just do not get it. But of course I understand that, as I was once like that myself, minus the insults.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
I know stan…I follow the blogs and I remember. That same person was doing the same under a different name in a different blog.
I wish that when blogging here, you used your email and could just not make up a name with the wind. Go to CNN and you can see the Obamazombies blogging away using multiple names…it is sickening some of the comments they make about Clinton. They have no respect nor understanding.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Raleigh Voter–
I applaud you. That is exactly how all people should decide on who to vote for.
The media are all biased in one way or another and none of what we see is actual news, it is simply editorial.
I think a lot of what is out there on all the candidates is pure BS though. Who of us could stand up to that kind of scrutiny and come out pure white?
Anyway, although I don’t share your support for Hillary, I agree 100% with your process for making your decision.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Clintons record is good she is very good for the folks she works for, folks will even say if it were like England she would be PM. McCain is 50-50 right down the middle. Obama mostly has bill honoring folks and present. Even on the partial birth abortion he voted present. He may be OK but he’s never given a solid answer. there is the Thomas registry to look those things up
Posted by: joker4usa | May 30, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Raleigh Voter and Staniam–
I have not changed names. I also have not commented on any other site besides abc news, so if you saw a Hello, it wasn’t me. But it is kind of a no brainer handle, I mean HELLO.
And staniam is also NCdem, thinkingdem, dem38 and many others. So pot, stop calling kettle black.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
The thing is Hello, the “news” sites should not be all about editorial. Whom can we trust to give us unbiased news? Just tell me like it is da mn it!
I do not mind listening to others opinions but when all I see is trashing and bashing going on I wonder about the intellect of the voters.
Look at what happened with George W…TWICE. I could not believe he was reelected.
Now people can go on and on with McBush or McSame but I strongly believe that he is a good man who would do good things…and I say that as a former Dem.
I think the Dems are going to shoot themselves in the foot by attacking McCain…it will make them look bad…especially with the old age stuff.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Well I use other names too..most do…
Like when I post things like this cause I hate to look like I am attacking, but I do like to pass things on that are a little disconcerting, which this vid is.
http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/thats-just-how-white-folks-will-do-you/
I do remember when the race card was played and the whole thing with race is really disturbing. I strongly feel that Obama’s campaign was race baiting and no matter how you look at it, it is wrong.
I mean Obama’s past does show a lot of dirty politics and it sickens me that people believe he is so clean.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Raleigh Voter–
Again, I agree with you, surprise.
It would be great to just get news, but no such luck. I really could care less what Chris Mathews, Olberman and Bill O”Reilly think. I have a brain, give me the facts and let me decide.
I’ll be honest, I was very pro McCain at the beginning of this. I think he has gone to far to appease the far right. I hope he will get a little Maverick back in his bounce real quick here.
I share your frustration with the whole process. Now was not the time for this. I’ll go out on a limb and say I wish Hillary had just come in and taken no prisoners back in February. Obama would have either been her VP or had his time in 8 years.
Too late to put the genie back in the bottle now. Hopefully whoever wins doesn’t screw up too bad. Could it really be worse than Bush??
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
If Hussein Obama is president, Iran will be a nuculer power, and Odinga Obama’s brother in Kenya will be sherring the American atomic bombs.
Posted by: Moe | May 30, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Raleigh Voter,
Do kid yourself. Come Tuesday when those slimy lying Clintons are finished, the big guns are coming out against McBush, that old fool is TOAST!
Barack had to treat your insane drunken Hillary with kid gloves. Or else everyone would have pegged him as the angry black man beating up on the poor defenseless white woman.
That all ends on Tuesday. Obama and all the rest of us are going to expose that fool for what he is, an old borderline Alzheimer’s patient!!!
Who is going to stop us?? You? Ha, ha!!
Go Obama!!!!
Posted by: Davis | May 30, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
“McBush or McSame” now that is racist
what’s next pot o gold jokes , how about cheap scottsman jokes or nina.
Remember the great American melting pot. Name calling is not so good there are real issues that people are worried about like Lisa’s kids and the economy and healthcare. We all should be pusing to get the most bang for our buck on those issues.
Posted by: joker4usa | May 30, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Nothing could be as bas as Bush…except maybe Obama…lol…
Had to say that because honestly…it is how I feel.
I watched Chris Matthews religiously during the 2000 election. Now I do not watch MSNBC at all. I actually prefer Fox as I think they have been the most objective…hard to believe. Many say they are pro-Hillary but maybe that is because they are used to CNN and MSNBC. I did watch O’Reilly tonite and thought it funny how he went off on MSNBC. I kind of like him though…and this is coming from someone who used to hate Fox.
Turns out, their ratings continue to go up and up since many Dems and Indies are sick of some of subjectiveness of the other networks.
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Staniam,
You buzzing around here? You little Hillary insect… Make the most of it you Hillary clingers, you have until Tuesday and then you are all finished!!!
You will all have to switch to the next losing side after that. But you Hillary people are used to being losers, so I am sure it will suit you all just fine…
Posted by: Davis | May 30, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Raleigh Voter,
Since you like to watch FOX News like a good little Republican, then I am sure you are happy with the big news:
Rupert Murdoch — Chairman of News Corp, new WSJ owner, and longtime torchbearer for conservative politics — said this about Barack Obama: “He is a rock star.
I love what he is saying about education. I think he will win and I am anxious to meet him.”
About the presumptive Republican nominee, Murdoch said, “McCain is a friend of mine. But I think he’s got a lot of problems. He has been in Congress a long time, and you have to make a lot of compromises. So what’s he really stand for?… I think he has a lot of problems.”
This is the Owner of FOX news my delusional Hillary friends… It is OVER for both Hillary and McInsane!
Obama 08!!!!!!
Posted by: Davis | May 30, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
staniam–
I haven’t changed names or anything else. I am just reflecting on how out of control this has all gotten.
Real people can have realizations that things might have been better for everyone if things had gone just a little differently.
I would still vote for Hillary, even if she wrenches the nomination away from Obama. She is counting on just that by the way.
I don’t like Hillary, I think she is a crook, but what politician isn’t. She would probably be a good President. I have said that before. No change in position.
I have also said I used to like the Maverick McCain. Not loving him right now though.
A republican operative is not going to come on here and say all three have merits now are they. Is a republican operative going to say they would vote for HIllary even though they can’t stand her. Is a republican operative going to then say they prefer Obama?
I am a big mess of don’t knows right now.
The only thing I am sure of is that I don’t like you.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Let’s put Davis on ignore…
just the type of blogger that makes the intelligent people with real thoughts run for the hills…
Sorry Davis…many of us do not care about the winning, the losing, the insulting comments, the put downs and so on…we like to express our thoughts rather than to get in a shouting match about who can trash and bash better…
your comments show your age and lack of wisdom…
As far as McCain goes…wisdom does come with age…and older people deserve our respect as well as former Presidents and First Ladies. I am sorry that it is beyond your comprehension. Besides…it’s just my opinion…
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Staniam,
You know better than that, I never change names, you insect…
Why would I do that? I am not hiding from anyone, especially you delusional Clintonites!
Hey where is Hillary at tonight? Out having some more beers and shots with the boys buying votes??
What a drunken loser she is, her “has been husband” too with his big red drunk nose!
Posted by: Davis | May 30, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Obviously I am not Davis. Our entire tone is very different.
I like Raleigh Voter. I think he/she is a genuine person just trying to make the right decision.
Everyone should believe me in one thing, I really dislike you Staniam and have zero respect for you.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am
I agree Hello…about McCain moving right. But I believe he is doing that just to appease the conservative Bush supporters.
I find it unnecessary though…I mean what far righters do you know that would let an ultra left liberal into the White House with a dem house and senate??
He will move more center and has shown that. You have to admire him though for going against Bush in that one abortion clip. Not many politicians would do that…
I just hate the way some people refuse to look at other candidates and just spout off the same rhetoric that they hear others say. It reminds me of the Obamazombies who say the same ol things…like sheep
At least have your own thoughts
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am
I am a she…and I like stan…I think its funny how He? talks back to some of the hardcore rhetoric spouting Obama supporters…
I can’t blame stan for doing it…lol
Any thoughts on the Texas Polygamy thing? I knew right from the get go that the state was going about it all wrong. Regardless of what you think of the “cult”, they do have certain rights. You just can’t go in and take people’s kids away without proof that they are being abused.
Just my two cents…
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Raleigh Voter–
I think you are right about McCain. I think he will start to move back to the center. I don’t think he needed to appease the far right either, who are they going to vote for, Obama?? Right!
I think there are zombies on both sides, HRC and Obama. All Obama supporters aren’t zombies or kool-aid drinkers. Some of us are just more liberal thinkers and willing to take a leap of faith on someone untested. I have read his policy positions and agree with 90% of them.
Anyway, I am signing off. It was nice to have a civilized conversation with you.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
I am going too…puter battery is almost dead…a sign to go to bed…nite to all that are blogging…
even to Davis..who likes to call people insects…what is that all about?
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Raleigh Voter–
Funny you should ask about the polygamy thing. I am actually a mormon, yeah I know weird for a mormon to vote Obama.
They did handle it wrong, I agree. I don’t agree with polygamy but I think they caused a heck of a lot of trauma on those kids unnecessarily. It was handled very badly and on unreliable information.
I believe in the constitution and I don’t think their constitutional rights were upheld here.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Staniam,
You are just as insane as you new candidate McBush. I don’t need back-up to slam as many of you Hillary fools as necessary.
I can’t wait until next Tuesday when the real fight begins though… However, I don’t think it will be as much fun slamming McInsane bloggers, because most of them are to old to know how to “work” a computer! Ha, ha!
Also I write all my own material and don’t cut and paste from right wing sites like most of you idiots do!
Obama 08!!
Posted by: Davis | May 30, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Well Hello…I think that McCain should ick Romney :-)
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Staniam–
I don’t have a side.
I can’t tell you how I will vote until I come out of the booth in November.
I am not that passionate about any of them. You are just fun to mess with.
Have a good one.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
pick I mean :-) He would make it well rounded…but then the conservatives would hate it…but like you said…who else would they vote for?
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
Raleigh Voter,
The only one I call an “insect” is staniam and he knows why…
The rest of you ex-Clintonites I just call you what you are, delusional fools…
Posted by: Davis | May 30, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
I am at the point now Davis where I call anyone that votes Dem this election a delusional fool…
btw…I was an early Obama supporter, then Edwards…then Clinton…but the more I come to know about the Dem party, the less I like…
McCain will likely get my vote because he is above them all..
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Raliegh voter-
Agreed, again. Romney would be a good choice. he would win Michigan and maybe even Massachusetts’s. Game over.
Have a good evening.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Goodnite :-)
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
Staniam–
I know you won’t vote Obama, why would I try to convince you.
Leaving now, seriously though have a good one.
Posted by: HELLO | May 30, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Tell me something. Carrying this to the convention benefits Hillary in what way? There is more than a presidential
race going on. What about The congressional and senate races and their supporters? Before people get too mad at the DNC..people need to understand politics 101 with democratic contenders running at all levels. Are the Clintons thinking about the party and the possible outcome for congress?
It is not about the people. It is about the Clintons.
Posted by: Amanda | May 30, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
My question is…where are all the west coasters…doesn’t anyone blog anymore?
:-)
Well most educated Clinton supporters who will vote McCain would do so not out of spite, but because he shows pretty good judgment and his service to country should be admired. He has shown he can work with all and is committed to his values…even pro-life which I disagree with…but I must say, the older I get (37) the more I question my pro-choice stance…
Can’t we just rely on the morning after pill or the abortion drug???
The Dems are going to use one scare tactic after another to keep Clinton’s supporters from voting McCain or staying home
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
What do you do for a living stan?
I was a Bio teacher until it proved to be too stressful…bringing my work home every night.
Now I sell on ebay so I have much more flexibility…I have been wasting far too much time blogging though…
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am
Screw them all “Amanda”
I am so sick of the political pandering from the superdelegates…most in an effort to gain the Black support in their districts/states…
It has all been shameful. To accuse Clinton of being all about power and selfish is turning a blind eye to your own candidate.
Spare us with the party bullcrap
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
night stan…battery IS dead now..
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 30, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
C Good
Do your self a favor. Obviously you are back stabbing republican too and I can sense that you are a racist. So why don’t you just wait til’ Noverber and vote for McCain and just shut up.
Canada for Obama
Posted by: Susie (British Columbia) | May 30, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
Sean
sorry if your in denial but it’s okay things will be better when you start accepting that Hillary already lose. It is part of a healing process.
Canada for Obama
Posted by: Susie (British Columbia) | May 30, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
Dann
I agree with you 100% that Democratic party should reunite now to take on Mc Cain towards the General Election instead Hillary is dragging this party down. She probably needed more fundraising money to pay herself back.
Canada for Obama
Posted by: Susie (British Columbia) | May 30, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Dann
I agree with you 100% that Democratic party should reunite now to take on Mc Cain towards the General Election instead Hillary is dragging this party down. She probably needed more fundraising money to pay herself back.
Canada for Obama
Posted by: Susie (British Columbia) | May 30, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
HILLARY & McCAIN FANS,
Sorry, but it is really over now!!
Rupert Murdoch’s not-quite-but-almost endorsement of Barack Obama for president.
The founder — and defender — of Fox News said he expected Obama to win in a landslide, citing widespread unhappiness with the current administration and his disenchantment with Republican contender John McCain.
Murdoch added that after a long career in the Senate, McCain had been forced to compromise too much and doesn’t stand for much. Murdoch even nonchalantly owned up to influencing the New York Post to back Obama in the New York primary.
So all of you Hillary people, where is your phony “elect ability” argument now???
Obama 08!!! In a LANDSLIDE!!!
Posted by: Davis | May 30, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
HP Boston
The only person that are taking your money is Hillary. No one is trying to shut you guys out. They are just saying that the race is over.
Canada for President Barack Obama
Posted by: Susie (British Columbia) | May 30, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Davis
Amen to that.
Canada for Obama
Posted by: Susie (British Columbia) | May 30, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
Its so TRUE………Hillary feels because she is WHITE….SHE is entitled….WRONG !!! What is wrong with you people…..and now she suggests/insinuate/desperate want to have that man Killed. What a shame. that white woman.. Hillary.. is SICK.
Posted by: Neil | May 30, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
If you dont like a Black man being President of the USA….Dont vote for him or just …..LEAVE !!! This is Gods’ Earth….Not a WHITE Person….and Certainly not Hillarys’…If God be for you, Who can be against you? May the best man…God’s Choice…WIN !
Posted by: Neil | May 30, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Everyone interested in the Democratic primary should checkout Mrs. Clinton’s memorandum to the Rules & Bylaws committee and super delegates. Here is the link: http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/05/hillary_clintons_closing_argum.html
(this page also includes a link to the PDF version of the full memorandum.) It is at the level of a high school cheerleader who can’t win the election to become the President of the class, but appeals to the Administration to appoint her anyway. Quite frankly, it is embarrassing that she is even being considered to become President of the world’s most powerful and wealthy country.
Posted by: Roger Canaday | May 30, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
IT IS OVER AND OVER.PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN AND THEIR VOICE HAVE BEEN HEARD. LET US HAVE OUR NOMINEE AND BEGIN THE FALL FIGHTING. I AM OPTIMISTIC THAT DEMOCRAT WILL ABSOLUTELY THIS COMING ELECTION IN NOVEMBER.
Posted by: I.A.T.SMITH | May 30, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am
Hillary’s finished. The only question that remains is will she try to bring down the democratic party in a massive hissy fit, or will she try to save what little is left of the Clinton “legacy”? (A legacy of shame, if you ask me) For all you Clinton crazies out there that still think she can win this fair and square, keep your eyes to the skies, cause I heard that the comet that’s coming to pick you and your glorious leader up is due anytime now! Enjoy the Kool Aid!
Posted by: RoyM | May 30, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am
The quest for power has driven the Clintons to insanity.
Someone is winning them fair and square, and they are insisting on destroying the party with bogus claims.
Isn’t that childish and insane?
Posted by: Republican | May 30, 2008, 5:23 am 5:23 am
DNC leaders want to lose the White House. Pelosi wants to stay the most powerful Democrat 4 more years. They know Obama is unelectable.
Posted by: libre | May 30, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am
If the DNC nominates barack, Democrats won’t vote for him.
Posted by: libre | May 30, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am
libre =============
You don’t get a party nomination by just screaming that your opponent can not win.
You get the nomination by winning the primaries according to the laid down rules.
So you guys should stop barking like dogs.
There’s a very thin line between desperation and insanity.
Posted by: Republican | May 30, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am
America doesn’t know what democracy is. Maybe Bush should invade to teach them.
Posted by: Sylvia in Oslo | May 30, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am
The supreme right to vote in FL and MI in a primary is soooooo overblown… this is never how primaries go… only this time CLinton created a gigantic cause out of it… typically many states are locked out of ‘counting’ because the race is over too soon for their votes to matter and the candidates don’t bother much with the campaign… i.e. McCain’s primary run is rather unimportant to republicans since he locked in the nomination….. so why in God’s earth is it all of a sudden a matter of civil rights for FL and MI to not be disenfranchised…. it blows ones mind how easily people fall for the slop of sensationalism coming from Clinton…. they started this whole business of governing by campaigning that went to extremes with Bush Admin… now we see its results in both Bush and Clinton camps… and hopefully, we are seeing the last hooplah chapter.
Posted by: origood | May 30, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am
“They’ve already made their decision”. Yes and we have already made ours. The corrupt DNC with Dean, Pelosi and Reid at the helm have decided the election for YOU a long time ago.
Now left with the choice of McCain or Obama what are the all those bitter, childish, racist and bigoted voters supposed to do?
If you feel that the democratic party has sold you out, you are not alone. The idea of voting for a party that has already chosen the candidate THEY think should be in office, takes democracy to the height of hypocracy. How much more of this scam do you intend to take?
You can free yourself from this party mentality by REGISTERING INDEPENDENT and then be free to vote for the person YOU want, not who the party wants.
Posted by: '68 VNvet | May 30, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
If the super delegates give the nomination to Obama, they are giving McCain the Presidency. It sounds like Dean, Peloski, Reid, want to lose the election.
Posted by: BARBANEL | May 30, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am
68,
Please explain to me how the DNC “sold out”? I keep hearing this and I just don’t understand it.
Posted by: jmc663 | May 30, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
This is what I don’t understand, how fair was it that Obama’s name was left off the ballats in 2 states? Of course Clinton wants those states counted Obama didn’t have a chance there with his name not on the ballats. And I think what they are saying about the Superdelegets is they have already announced who they will vote for so why put it off until August, which really is a stupid thing to do if the outcome will remain the same anyway! Of course if they superdeleget hasn’t said or committed to one or the other and there is a good chance of a tie or not knowing who will win then by all means wait until August. But boy reading these comments you can sure tell who is a republican and who has fallen for the crocodile tears!
Posted by: Tehya | May 30, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
Why were those two states given waivers???
The demographics of SC favored Obama and they knew it. That election came early on in the primary and became pivotal as we already know.
I do not agree with your opinion on open primaries. If you want to vote for the person and not the party………REGISTER INDEPENDENT!
Posted by: '68 VNvet | May 30, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
The whole primary was a sham. The DNC and media wanted Obama from the get go. They should have coronated him months ago and spare the average voter of the bitterness. There is so much envy between these wealthy powerful democrats at the expense of voters. May the Democratic party reap what it deserves!
Posted by: evie | May 30, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
I think Hillary should run as an independent. She would wipe the floor with him. I will never vote for Obama now. Never. I know many people who feel the same way.
Posted by: Brian | May 30, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
libre =============
You don’t get a party nomination by just screaming that your opponent can not win.
You get the nomination by winning the primaries according to the laid down rules.
So you guys should stop barking like dogs.
There’s a very thin line between desperation and insanity.
Posted by: Republican | May 30, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Brian,
While that appears to be attractive, where would she get the money? The GE is hugely expensive and she couldnt raise enough money. Besides, she would have to have her name on the ballot in a number of states long before now.
Independent is just not a viable option.
Posted by: jmc663 | May 30, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
THE DNC “BIGWIGS” NEED TO QUIT DICTATING HOW THE CAMPAIGN IS RUN…GIVE HILLARY THE VOTES, IT’S WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT! LEAVE THE SUPER DELEGATES TO DO WHAT THEY DECIDE TO DO, WITHOUT PRESSURE…SEE OBAMA FOR THE ge LOSER THAT HE IS AND QUIT PUTTING HILLARY DOWN, BECAUSE, BY THE POPULAR VOTE, THE PEOPLE WANT HER AND, BY THE GALLUP POLL, SHE IS THE ONLY ONE TO BEAT “Mr McGOO” McCAIN!!!
Posted by: Di | May 30, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Many staunch Clinton supporter like Ed Rendell are now giving up because they know in their minds that Obama has won fair and square.
Ed Rendell said ” I am a realist, it’s very unlikely that Clinton will win”
Many fools are still whining and dreaming about the impossible.
Posted by: Republican | May 30, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
The DNC , Howard Dean, Pelosi, Reid and the super delegates have decided some time a go Obama should be the nominee. African American super delegated baggeridge other African American to chose Oabama. Threats like if he isn’t the nominee there may be riots in the streets (Mayor of Richmond Virginia). So! This is what they call the democratic process. I am glad, I am an independent!
Posted by: jp,michigan | May 30, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
The more Hillary fights the more foolish she looks.
She will destroy her political career and that’s what we, the republicans want.
Posted by: Republican | May 30, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
An American in Canada for David
===============================
Obama will lose the war because your candidate is not getting the nomination.
What a self-serving way to think.
Posted by: Republican | May 30, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Question: How do you argue against a war you voted for?
Answer: Not too effectively. (see Kerry/Edwards)
Clinton is just as divisive and baggage-saddled as Obama and she doesn’t exactly embody change…
Posted by: Ryan | May 30, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
How can you argue against a war when you did not even have a vote in the first place nor when you show a habit of avoiding the tough issues?
Posted by: memyselfandI | May 30, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
“Slippery Hillary” will find a way to drag this thing out to the convention and still lose.
Posted by: PhilBgood | May 30, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Before the primaries started I swore that I would not vote for a Republican…but now seeing how the media and the backroom massaging of the numbers by the Obama and Pelosi people have taken place, I will vote most definitely Republican if Hillary doesn’t get the nomination. In all the years that I have followed the election process, I have never seen so many people be so duped by a man who has absolutely nothing to offer as far as intelligence or experience. B.H.O. is more the actor than the statesman. Perhaps that’s why Oprah loves him so much.
Posted by: Johnhal | May 30, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I have heard and seen HRC is winning BIG!!!. Despite that BO leads among the pledged and super delegates at least by 200. Why??? Because someone is whining BIG!!! not winning. Because someone wants the White House back desperately so that they can continue the Saga that started in 1993. We don’t need part II of the Saga “The revenge of the Monica Lewinski”. If you can’t face truth, go vote for McCain, help make US the newest member of the 3rd world countries, US$ is worth almost 20% less than a year ago, beg for more money from China, India, Russia, Japan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Singapore (Saudis and Oil rich countries only loans money to Al-Qaeda) only to blow it up in IRAQ. Pave the way to a brighter future for our children and grand children when they will be living in slums and working in McDonald while watching our bond holder’s sons and daughters graduating from MIT, Harvard and Cornell, going back to their countries since there won’t be any paying jobs other than McDonald, Burger King. McCain is wrong, he does not understand economics; it won’t take 100 years, just two more terms to achieve the McCain’s version of American dream.
Posted by: SAQ | May 30, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
I see comments are slowing down, but I’ll put my 2 cents in anyway. I’ve been a republican all my life, but I voted for Clinton for his second term because he understood the economy (the first dem to do so) and I thought that Bob Dole was too old. A good man but to old-time for the reigns of govt to be handed to a new generation.
This contest and the debate I find quite interesting, especially here where the debate is mostly among dems. I could have supported Hillary-maybe not experienced in foreign affairs, but at least as first lady she traveled and was familiar with many foreign leaders. But then she went negative, and started re-inventing history(sniper fire)
I watched Obama’s speech when he was here in Idaho and drew a huge crowd. I liked what I heard, a message of hope and empowerment, of a future that holds promise. He’s a great speaker, and that in my mind is important. Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan were great speakers. Al Gore and John Kerry were not. They both came off sounding like they had little respect for the ordinary citizen.
But I am uneasy in some of the things Obama has had to say on foreign policy. I find him to be rather naive in some ways. That he would consider speaking to Castro, Abudinijad, or Hamas or Hezbola is flat wrong. Any discussions of that sort should be done through lower level diplomats and third parties.
And to not have a continued presence in Iraq and the Mideast in general is unwise when this region is so important and so volatile.
So I find myself looking at McCain. As a pro-choice, pagan republican, I’m reassured that at least he’s not a Jesus-on-my-sleave born again republican. He’s a moderate. That’s good. Perhaps he can change the D.C. establishment some by working across party lines when necessary. I don’t see Obama doing that.
Oh, the age thing. Well I’m 55 now, and I would have thought that by now the Rolling Stones would be too old for rock and roll, but…
Advice to dems: GET RID OF HOWARD DEAN.
Posted by: KAPinIDAHO | May 30, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Belle: This is Democracy on steroids! And, we are unfortunately forced to watch it. Get popcorn and drinks; gather the kids around because they will get to watch the premiere of the greatest “fairy tale” ever contrived. It will unfold on Saturday as if, no one knows what will happen… Then of course we will all trot off to church to hear another great sermon on how great and good misogyny is in American churches.
They, the “Party Elders” are putting the final touches on the script as we write these posts. There is a great effort to make it “look fair” because the “appearance of fairness” will be widely reported by the low IQ male misogynist press. The finality of the DNC decision will be widely reported in short words and sentences that these misogynists can understand. That should put an end to that woman and Obama will be ordained and there we go.
There is great effort to keep this out of “the convention” so that the delegates who are elected and sent to the convention already have their job done for them and then they, the elected delegates, don’t have to “discuss” any issues at the convention because the “Party Elders” know better and they, the “Party Elders” wouldn’t dare go against the “will of the people”. However, they, the “Party Elders”, will go against the will of millions of people but that won’t be reported because the illiterate misogynist male press really believes that millions of women who are highly pissed off at how Senator Clinton has been treated by the misogynist press are in fact invisible and don’t matter in this “electoral process” and that we will buy this lame excuse of a fairy tale of democracy and fall into the Obama love fest in the name of party unity. The disunity of the party, of course, lies on the back of Hillary Clinton for her stubborn refusal to succumb to the misogynist press ordination of Obama.
The “Party Smarties” have overlooked a tiny detail, and that is that many of us are not obedient, particularly to stupid party politics, so we won’t fall into line for the sake of party unity because at this point we don’t give a rat’s a… about party unity.
There is a sequel, but I don’t want to give away too much except to say it stars John McCain as President.
Ohhh, I can’t wait to see how it all turns out! “Pass the popcorn!”
Posted by: AmazonTraveler | May 30, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
I’ve finally had enough of all this BS. I am changing my affiliation from Democrat to Independent. What we need now is a good sensible third party. One person one vote
is a good mantra but until we get rid of the outmoded Electoral college, one person one vote will never be true. If the DNC really wants to be democratic then they need to change the rules. I suggest that as long as there is still the electoral college then the winner of the popular vote in a primary should get the number of electoral votes accorded that state. The candidate with the most electoral votes gets the nomination. Simple with no delegates and no BS. In regards to Clinton and Obama neither one is fit to be president and I won’t vote for them. Mcain will continue to mortgage our country with pilling on more debt fighting a needless “war” which I am unable to find out who the enemy really is, Sunnis Shias Insurgents Radical Islamists or possibly “martians”. Spend all the billions on making us energy independent and save trillions by closing all our bases on foreign soil. Let globalization and free trade pave the way for Democracy.
Posted by: Jdrindependent | May 30, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Why don’t we just rename this party the Dean-Pelosi party and be done with it?
Since they have made it clear that it will be their way or else, then my membership is no longer needed, is it?
I’m going to go register as an independent if they try to stop the democratic process any more than they already have. My little vote doesn’t mean anything to the powers that be, anyway.
Posted by: Mary | May 30, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
After a bitter and hotly contested selection process in 1968, a Democratic candidate who did not campaign was selected by party leaders at the Chicago convention.
The DNC and Democrat party leaders will not be able to produce a sole candidate prior to this year’s convention in Denver.
In a last ditch effort to unite the party, a candidate who chose not to campaign will again be selected.
Clinton and Obama will remain Senators. Democrats will win substantial majorities in Congress. Republicans will win the White House.
History will repeat itself.
Get used to it.
Posted by: Jayhawk | May 31, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am
“A BHO voter is someone who reads “Audacity of Hope”. An anti-BHO voter is someone who understands BHO”
- paraphrasing Ronald Reagan -
Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Folks!! It is OVER. HRC CANNOT WIN THIS RACE. SHE IS A VERY UNSTABLE PERSON. HOW CAN SHE BE IN CHARGE OF ANYTHING? SHE NEED TO GO HOME ALREADY AND THANK GOD FOR LIFE. SHE IS A LIAR, A CHEAT. NO INTEGRITY AND NO CHARACTER. WHY WOULD SHE WANT TO BRING BILL BACK INTO THE WHITE HOUSE? TO DIRTY IT SOME MORE WITH? PLEASE SPARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD IS LAUGHING AT THE SO-CALLED AMERICAN PEOPLE.
Posted by: ANNE BOGDANOWICZ | May 31, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm