By Greg Wallace

May 31, 2008 3:08am

Dems Behind Closed Doors Till 1:30 a.m., With Still No Consensus

ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Gregory Wallace report: Democrats went behind closed doors until 1:30 a.m. ET on Saturday, but they did not reach their goal of developing a unified proposal regarding Michigan and Florida. 

Twenty-eight of the 30 members of the DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee were joined by DNC Chairman Howard Dean for the marathon dinner meeting that took place in a hotel ballroom at the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel in Washington, D.C.

"It was a full discussion; we’ll see what happens," said Hillary Clinton adviser Harold Ickes. "And I think there was some agreement on some issues and still some disagreement on others."

The key sticking point is how to allocate delegates in Michigan where Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., took his name off of the ballot.

There appears to be more agreement on how to proceed with Florida.

The most likely scenario is for the Sunshine State’s entire delegation to be seated — each member with 1/2 vote.

The exhausted DNC members are scheduled to reconvene publicly at 9:30 a.m. ET. They will hear from the presidential campaigns, state party officials and party members challenging the DNC’s decision to strip Florida and Michigan of all delegates.

"There will probably be a little, sort of, tussling. But we’re Democrats, you know we sort of do that," said Allan Katz, an Obama supporter and committee member from Florida.

User Comments

Is Ickes and company insiting on penalizing Obama because he obeyed the committee’s rules in Michigan? What kind of fair play is that?

Posted by: Adrian Millet | May 31, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am

The rules ((Yes, your remember Mr. abide by the rules Dean) You know, the guy who supports Obama. Let’s see how this all shake’s out. This week….

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 31, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am

This is not about fairness. It is about building a case to be able to continue the campaign to the convention, something that will probably happen, regardless of the outcome of tomorrow’s meeting.

Posted by: Edward Murray | May 31, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

Seat the delegates and count the votes…what are we third world? This is rediculous!!!

Posted by: CD | May 31, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Obama liars love to point out that Obama was ORDERED to take his name off the ballot .
They say this to be jerks.
Everyone knows the DNC did not ask the candidates to yank their names off the ballot.
He , Edwards and Richardson did it on their own accord. Dodd, Clinton and others didnt.

Posted by: sandra | May 31, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Sue the Democrats

Posted by: asd | May 31, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am

This is still America, is it not? Since when do we run and count crooked elections? Obama did everything that the Democratic Party asked of him in it’s response to two states that cut in line. All state parties were represented in the vote to discipline and all candidates agreed to the sanction. Mrs. Clinton ran roughly 20 points ahead of Obama everywhere before he campaigned. She had tremendous name recognition. When he campaigned he won more than he lost. That’s why he has NEVER, not once since the first state voted, been behind in delegates chosen by the people. She won some and he won some, but in all cases where valid and legal elections were held, when all the counts were completed for any given election day and all counts leading up to that day in a running tally were counted, Obama has always been in the lead. To come in at the end of a 16 month battle and penalize him for following the rules and reward her for breaking them is disgusting. I’m from Michigan and Carl Levin and Jennifer Granholm will pay for this in the next election. This is just wrong. Levin and Granholm are rabid Clinton supporters, but this attempt to steal a presidential nomination should anger all Americans. What about the 48 states who played it square by the rules? What about 2012 when they all try to cheat? We’ll be holding primaries in the year before. It almost happened this time. Imagine going through this for a year and a half or two years every election.

Posted by: karela | May 31, 2008, 4:06 am 4:06 am

“Sunshine State’s entire delegation to be seated — each member with 1/2 vote” = VOTE FOR MCCAIN IN NOV.

Posted by: crat3 | May 31, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

FL and MI should not count at all. The rules were set and now they are being changed. Regardless of what candidate you are for, this is very unethical. I really don’t care how many people voted in a election they knew wouldn’t count. MI and FL should suffer for voting the fools in who pushed up there primaries. dumb dumb dumb

Posted by: Tim | May 31, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

Hillary Clinton knew all the rules going in. Since she and her husband HAVE to win, always and in anyway, they are spoiling for a fight. Unfortunately they want to win what the couldn’t at the ballot box and caucuses by making more of their dirty back-room deals. The same kind they made with Bill pardoning hundreds for money at the end of his term….
This is now all about the Clinton’s making sure Obama will not win in November, raising the race card so many times, just so they can run again in 2012. I have to agree with Mike….I am ashamed to be a Democrat now.
Hillary is such a weak woman, she has had to resort to crying (figuratively and literally) and playing the gender and race cards repeatedly.

Posted by: Mike | May 31, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

In terms of Michigan, since Edwards endorsed Obama, he can just give his delegates to Obama (which is most of the uncommitted) and that is that.

Posted by: maritza | May 31, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

COUNT ALL VOTES!!!
It’s the democracy, stupid!!!
If not Sen. Obama isn’t the legitim nominee.

Posted by: Bridget | May 31, 2008, 5:06 am 5:06 am

Once again Hillary is showing us that she really is more concerned with Hillary than she is the Democratic Party or even the entire nation. When it’s to her advantage, she follows the rules. When it’s not to her advantage, she breaks the rules. If this situation were reversed, you can bet she would be whining that Florida and Michigan should not be seated.
Whatever works for you, Hillary. It’s all about you. Don’t worry about the party or the nation.

Posted by: Bill | May 31, 2008, 5:17 am 5:17 am

The DNC started this primary season with the belief that a “refrigerator” could beat President Bush. They are so confident that his unpopularity will lead to a landslide Democratic victory they believe they can alienate the voters in Florida and Michigan with little ill effect. They are so confident that his unpopularity will lead to a landslide Democratic victory they believe they can alienate 50% of the 17 million voters supporting Hillary Clinton with little ill effect. They are so confident that his unpopularity will lead to a landslide Democratic victory they are willing to ignore the popular vote and the last two months of primaries and to dismiss the upcoming primaries and their voters as unimportant because of the “math.”
The old adage — pride comes before a fall — comes to my mind.

Posted by: jlynne | May 31, 2008, 5:30 am 5:30 am

Hope for Change,
There is such a thing as a leftist democrat. Democrats fall into three typical categories –
Conservative or Blue Dog or Dixiecrats — run on a pro-life, pro-gun, universal healthcare platform for children
moderate democrats — run on a reasonable restricts platform, abortions for the mother’s health, no assault weapons, universal healthcare for all
leftist or liberal democrats — run on a pure pro-choice platform (Obama voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act so he falls into this category), a ban all guns platform (again, Obama falls into this category), universal healthcare.
The majority of southern democrats are conservative democrats — hence the term Dixiecrats. Also, the overwhelming majority of Catholic democrats are conservative democrats — because of the church’s pro-life stance.
If this group votes Republican, which it has a strong tendency to do because of the pro-life and gun control issues — Democrats typically lose.
After Barack is named the nominee — and the conservative and some of the moderate democrats leave the party en masse — we’ll be able to see how deeply the division is. But these women who support Hillary — these women who fault for the right to vote and led the charge for Civil Rights in the 1960s — they are not the kind of people to make idle threats. The party and the Obama supporters are wrong not to take them seriously.

Posted by: jlynne | May 31, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am

It does not matter what
the committee decides. One side
or the other will take them
matter to court where it will
finally be decided by the
Supreme Court. Immediately after
the results, the court actions
should be placed on a fast
track to finally settle the
matter.

Posted by: Beto | May 31, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am

At one time in American history, black people were counted as 1/2 persons.
Now, the Democrats want to count all Florida Democrats as 1/2 person.
History repeats itself.

Posted by: Jayhawk | May 31, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am

Mike,
I agree….The Clintons know what they are doing, This is very shameful. I too am ashamed of being a Democrat.

Posted by: Mark | May 31, 2008, 6:11 am 6:11 am

I will tell you one thing, If this goes in favor of Hillary, I will NEVER vote for another Democrat!!!

Posted by: Mark | May 31, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

independent voters who lean Democratic are more likely than any other subgroup tested to say they would vote for McCain if their candidate does not gain the nomination.
**********
Well they may be right, since I am an Independent voter!! I will vote for McCain if they let Hillary get her way!

Posted by: Mark | May 31, 2008, 6:21 am 6:21 am

Ah by the end of the week it will all be over, Obama will be the winner, and I will not need to read all these post by republicans pretending to be Hillery supporters.

Posted by: jim | May 31, 2008, 6:25 am 6:25 am

Can you imagine her as President!!!
The USA falls into a deep depression like we have never seen, “Its the VOTERS fault for electing her!” LOL

Posted by: Mark | May 31, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am

Being from Florida, I am the bookend to Karela’s sentiments. Both primaries were the result of poor state leadership and should not count. But I agree with others here too. If making some sort of compromised settlement to end the worst case of pandering and rule bending I’ve seen in elections in thirty years for Hillary’s sake with the pay off that it removes any lingering doubt as to who won the primary from the minds of even the least educated, I’m all for it. The joke is Obama wins regardless of how it is settled.

Posted by: S.E. Croft | May 31, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am

jlynne,
all of the voters are being taken seriously. but, we will not let a few loud mouths hi-jack and control the democrat’s selection for our presidential nominee.
clinton’s argument/threat is flawed on several points.
1st, a combined group of voters which includes all the other groups voted for obama. that may mean that just like current demographics are changing the electoral map, the groups that support the democratic party may be changing, too.
2nd, you assume that everyone in the two groups you feel have the most clout will vote the same way in the general. won’t happen.
3rd, you’ve “misstated” obama’s position on gun ownership and abortion. it’s balance here that matters.
trying to achieve more clout while discounting/suppressing the vote of others (states) is exactly why michigan and florida are in the boat they’re in now.
hillary clinton’s supporters put womanhood above all other fair principles. i am a woman, so i feel that position is crazy. it is like a mother with a son and a daughter not loving both equally. democracy is not about who’s pushier, who can out-shout the loudest or who can be the most vindictive. it is about a collective unity on issues that matter to the whole group — the group as a whole.
democracy embraces all in a fair and balanced way. play by the RULES and we’ll all get along!
unless you are saying that the demographics of florida and michigan voters is peculiar (as it is in wv and ky), then the group, taken as a whole, doesn’t gain or lose anything by not counting florida’s and michigan’s votes cast in their state’s non-elections. the issue is the rules, and the rules alone.
48 states followed the rules and chose obama as the democratic nominee. at this juncture, 17 million people voted FOR obama.
the democratic majority wants a change — a change that isn’t motivated by vindictiveness that will achieve nothing. changing the rules and accepting michigan and florida’s votes will not change the outcome of the democratic choice for presidential nominee. it would, however, give the republicans more fodder.
obama ’08! YES WE CAN (AND WE WILL)!

Posted by: hope for change | May 31, 2008, 6:44 am 6:44 am

Just Another Excuse:
LOL, Priceless!!

Posted by: Mark | May 31, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

“It appears that if Obama is on the ticket, some groups of Clinton-supporting Democrats are more susceptible to bolting the party and voting for the Republican nominee next fall than are others.”
They have apparently polled the wrong groups. I will not vote for Clinton and I’ve never voted republican in my life. I vote the economy, period. I vote Obama!
Obama ’08!

Posted by: hope for change | May 31, 2008, 6:54 am 6:54 am

Sen Obama took a name off from ballot because he recognized he cannot win in Michigan.

Posted by: whatever | May 31, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am

Perception is reality.
No logical explanation is going to prevent the people in Florida and Michigan from believing they were deprived of a meaningful voice in this election — or that the DNC played an important role in that deprivation.
No amount of cajoling is going to convince a pro-life democrat that someone who blocked the implementation of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act shares their values.
No amount of cajoling is going to convince a pro-2nd Amendment democrat that someone who favors implementing the UN Millenium standards banning all small arms shares their values. If you look at the Obama Global Anti-Poverty bill, Obama’s position paper that his staffers completed, and his statements in Chicago where he said that the city was more dangerous for school children than Baghdad was for IL soldiers — my characterization of his position is not overstated.
I imagine he will have difficulty cajoling conservative democrats to support his position on decriminalizing marijuana and ending the war on drugs too.
We live in a soundbite world — those soundbites are going to be very powerful

Posted by: jlynne | May 31, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

Just another excuse!!!
Great find!
“I intend to campaign hard through February. As you know, it the DELEGATES who determine our nominee. I believe I will have the majority of pledged delegate by the end of the races in February”
-Hillary Clinton Dec ’07
“You don’t hear us whining about the press”
- Bill Clinton in PA ‘08

Posted by: IslandGirl | May 31, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

All of us are judged by the company and friends we keep. “Birds of a feather flock together”. Wright/Otis/Pfegler/Ayers/”I am prud of my country for the first time” all fir together. Pfleglers racist sexist statements confirms that vitriol was spewing consistently in that church for 20 yrs. Despite all the lies and denials of no knowledge whatsoever despite the spirtual mentor/sdvisors/friend/uncle/family tags the chieckens will come home to roost. Is the Democratic party so dumb and blind that it simply does not understand simple Math and logic to add 1+1+1+1=4. It is time for all of Reagan Democrats to reject the Democratic party once and for all and despite having the worst ever, yes the worst ever President in our History leave office, vote JM back into office. I will never, repeat never, elect someone with such radical anti-american frinds to office. Stick around Hillary. The Republicans will write Chapters 10,11, 12,13, 14 and 15 to the Wright saga. There will be much more to follow.

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 31, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

Being judged by the company we keep, Doesnt mean we have the same mind set of the people we keep as company.
And can you say listening to a pastor speak once a week for an hour is really keeping company?
Lots of people “use” church for buisness connections, Not saying this is why Obama went to church….Im just saying.

Posted by: IslandGirl | May 31, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am

Obama’s position paper that his staffers completed, and his statements in Chicago where he said that the city was more dangerous for school children than Baghdad was for IL soldiers
——–
Actually the number of miliatary personnel killed in Badhdad IS less than the number of school-aged kids killed in Chicago every year.
So people have a problem with facts?

Posted by: Tara James | May 31, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am

No — I watched in horror when parents were forced to send their kids to school on a bus with armed guards. The situation in Chicago is abhorrent — if change is needed anywhere it is needed there.
My point was Obama gave a speech — after something like 5 school children were killed in a week — where he said the solution to the problem was gun control — that handguns were not used for hunting and should be banned.
The problem is real and should be addressed — I just don’t think most people who support the 2nd Amendment will agree with his solution.
I didn’t mention Obama opposing the death penalty for gang-related murders. I have already seen the Willie Horton-like add for that. I’ll see if I can post the link.

Posted by: jlynne | May 31, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

This blog is a bit misleading…
They should have mentioned that Obama did NOT put his name on the ballot in MI, It was added, When Obama found out that his name had been added to the ballot he removed his name.
He knew that MI votes did not count so this talk about him removing his name when he knew he was behind is really stupid.

Posted by: IslandGirl | May 31, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

Being judged by the company we keep, Doesnt mean we have the same mind set of the people we keep as company.
And can you say listening to a pastor speak once a week for an hour is really keeping company?
Lots of people “use” church for buisness connections, Not saying this is why Obama went to church….Im just saying.
——————
Thank You!
People who buy into this stuff are the same people who hear 10 seconds of something on the evening news and never bother to look further.
These same people circulate emails with blatent lies and think because it’s in print it must be true. They never bother to consider the credibility of the source.
Now those are the SCARY people in our society, far more so than some over zealous church pastors. Because they can led like lemmings over the cliff and never question it.

Posted by: Tara James | May 31, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am

The DNC has sent a message to the Democratic voters, that they are Gods over the people. What they want and say is more important than the Democrats in the party.
They have meddled in the election. They have altered the course of the election.
The refused to have a meeting in the beginning for the people, but will now have a meeting to decided upon what they want, not the people.
The have proven they do not care about what the people of the party wants. What is in best Interest of the entire party. what is in Best interest of the country.
That is Not democratic.
That Is Not American
That is the DNC playing God and being political Fixers.

Posted by: seah | May 31, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

The DNC has sent a message to the Democratic voters, that they are Gods over the people. What they want and say is more important than the Democrats in the party.
They have meddled in the election. They have altered the course of the election.
The refused to have a meeting in the beginning for the people, but will now have a meeting to decided upon what they want, not the people.
The have proven they do not care about what the people of the party wants. What is in best Interest of the entire party. what is in Best interest of the country.
That is Not democratic.
That Is Not American
That is the DNC playing God and being political Fixers.

Posted by: seah | May 31, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am

The election in MI and FL wouldn’t stand the scrutiny of any election commission anywhere in the world.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | May 31, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

It is about fairness…fairness to the millions that went out and voted. Hillary put her name on the ballot in Michigan, Obama could have chosen to do so but decided for whatever reason, not too…but Obama DID put his name on the ballot in Florida, again he did not have too, so why did he? And, it is good judgment too, didn’t Obama think that millions and millions of voters might be upset it they went down and voted and their votes were not counted? He didn’t think that far ahead—Hillary did. So we want to elect a man that doesn’t think ahead ofr think that all Americans should have their votes counted..hmmmm

Posted by: Anne | May 31, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am

Obama naturally does not want Michigan or Florida to re-vote as it has been offered by several to pay for it….let the true American vote count…Obama’s campaign say no because he would loose in both and Hillary Clinton would really stand out as being ahead in popular vote. Obama says NO! You cannot have these people re-vote, I will not accept that and I am in charge now………….democracy is a thing of the past…too many older and white people in Florida and blue collar workers in Michigan. Forget them I do not need them.

Posted by: Anne | May 31, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Both elections were tainted. In Michigan Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot and Hillary Clinton barely beat the ‘Uncommited’ choice. But voters in both states knew at the time that they were not electing delegates to the Convention, and this may have affected choices. I think its ridiculous not to seat the delegations at all. The 1/2 vote thing for Florida seems fine. It punishes Florida for breaking hte rules, but also recognises the result. Michigan is harder. In my view a 50/50 result is about all that can be done that would be fair.

Posted by: markymark | May 31, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am

This meeting is a real test for the democratic party to demonstrate that it is the party of fairness, the rule of law and it has democratic values and prnciples. It can demonstrate also that it is in a private Clintons’ machinery. Time will tell. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | May 31, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

Marky,
I think you are being to generous! :o)

Posted by: IslandGirl | May 31, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

OBAMA DID NOT FOLLOW THE RULES IN MICHIGAN. He had members of his campaign go door-to-door, urging and reminding people that an uncommitted vote would be a vote for HIM. Campaigning was against the RULES.

Posted by: Will429 | May 31, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

let the true American vote count
——
This comes from the person who says no one in MI would vote for Obama? That’s your version of “fair”, right?
No doubt Hillary has the Detroit area wrapped up. Sure she does.
And don’t count those four caucus states that Hillary leaves out of her count? Guess they’re not “true Americans” either. That’s “fair”, right.
Quit acting like this is some high and mighty moral debate. Hillary’s ONLY reason for caring is that she is losing. She obviously didn’t care about FL or MI until after she got wiped out in February. But now she’s claiming to be some champion of the people? Right.
“I intend to campaign hard through February. As you know, it’s the DELEGATES who determine our nominee. I believe I will have the majority of pledged delegate by the end of the races in February”
-Hillary Clinton Dec ’07

Posted by: Tara James | May 31, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

To me it is shame that this thing is happenning in the U.S. Changing the rules because of one woman. One thing is sure they have set a precedence. In 2012 every state is going to move their primaries forward. Can they punis them? No . They will always refer anybody to Clinton’s expisode. What a shame. It reminds me of African countries like Zimbabwe and Togo. Zimbabwe where Robert Mugabe has refused to leave even with him losing the elections.

Posted by: vuzous | May 31, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

It is just not listening to this vitriol once a week and lying about not having heard about it.This was more than it. This man was more than apersonal friend/”family”/spritual advisor/mentor/he was his inspiration for his politcs/the title of the book was a quote by the mentor/the family prayed together with the mentor before announcing his candidature. How many of us would have even sat through this vitriol? Not me. Not even Oprah? Was she afraid of losing her supporters? Pfegler was also a close associate. Campaign donations and supporting his church with more than 100k in state grants. You call it just another church and a pulpit? The same church praised Hamas and Gaddafi, condemned Israel beyond the anti-american hatred and gave Farrakhan a lifetime award? How can you be my President? If the Democratic party had any sense HRC will be the nomineee. A Democrat afetr GWB is a shoo in. We are in a worse crisis than the post Nixon era because of an idiot called GWB. Yet centrist Reagan Democrats like my extended family of 19 and Democrats are going to see JM(I will grant one thing, I have met him in person and I like the man and his sincerity, though I we disgree on the war,healthcare and fiscal democracy) become the next President of the US. How on earth are we letting it happen? I would like to see Bloomberg even at this late hour to come out and save us as it looks like you guys are stupid enough to boot HRC. BO will never ever become our president. I am no racist.I would vote for Collin Powelll for presidency in a heartbeat. He is to this day my number one choice for presidency(He will make an awesome President), but, never ever BO. The man is a phony, his associations and links will come home to roost.

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 31, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

It is time for all of us Reagan Democrats to abandon the Democratic Party and find an alternative independent party to the Republicans. The Republican are out of touch. But this is nothing compared to the very liberal,elitist,sexist Demcratic Party who are simply clueless and shun our basic values and the rights of Floridian voters like me. FL will be again red for JM in Nov and with OH doing the same it is game set and match to JM, unless some common sense comes out of the DNC and HRC is given the nomination.

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 31, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

Give her whatever she wants if it will make her go away. By this point the supers would never consider FL or MI as any reason to give her their votes. They know she is using a tactic that does not represent all the voters in FL and Mi just as the rest of the world knows it. To give Obama nothing from MI tells more of her ability to play fair than anything she has done in this election. Hillary and her thug Harrold the Ick have shown the world who they are and guess what? We believe them. pin headed nut jobs.

Posted by: Brian | May 31, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

It says a lot about us Americans when a man with an arabic name, a middle name of Hussein, and name so close to our National enemy numero uno that it is just a letter in the middle that is different is almost the Democratic party nominee. Let us be proud of that. But, that is where it stops. Unfortunately the man has similar radical and questionable associations as his name. He cannot be our President.

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 31, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Yes. let’s NOT seat FL and MI.
——————
Dumb comment. They ARE seating Mi and FL. Hillary just doesn’t get to decide how they will be seated. And she gets mad when she doesn’t get everything she wants – like the nomination or the Presidency for example.
Poor Hillary

Posted by: Tara James | May 31, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

He is the best orator I have ever heard in my life and the most inspirational at that. But let us separate fiction from reality. Why did he dump on the bipartisan immigration reform bill at the last minute by abstaining even though he was visibly for it until the last minute? Why did he vote present in Chicago for bills that would have made school environments more ppublically and morally safe? Do we have a King or a Pretender to the throne?

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 31, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

BO will never ever be our President. Period. It is not because of his race or name. But, this guy had close associations for the past 20 years (Youcan say he literally slept with them) with people with anti-american, racist, anti semetic sentiments, and proudly linked up those who are enimies and terrorists (Hamas and Gaddafi)

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 31, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

You talk about Gaffes. Sure everyone has made Gaffes include HRC and JM. But, how on earth can you be our President, when you stumble, hesitate and them come up with 57 states for the US? Have you watched the video? The man is a joke. The entire Democratic party will be a joke if they nominate this guy. Reagan Democrats for HRC and if not for JM.

Posted by: Warren5678 | May 31, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Mark, I will tell you one thing. If Obama is nominated I will vote for McCain. But I am a registered Independent anyway. I think the democrats could take lessons from the republicans on how to run a primary. All of this mess with the dnc is a bunch of crap anyway.

Posted by: dj jones | May 31, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

markymark,
That is exactly what I was thinking, too. If Clinton is so popular in Michigan, why did “uncommitted” get over 40% of the vote? Seems to me that Michigan voters made a very powerful statement by voting against her. Michigan voters want anybody but Hillary Clinton.
Obama 08

Posted by: uncommitted | May 31, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

To say that Obama is Presidential material because he won more PLEDGED DELEGATES from CAUCUSES is like saying he is the STRONGER candidate because he wins at WIENER AND MARSHMALLOW ROASTS. Please note that there are NO CAUCUSES in the General Election. He is in no way the STRONGER candidate, and any SUPER DELEGATE with any intelligence and politcal savvy at all knows that full well. The Convention should be all action-packed drama, kiddies, with Obama being just a big WIENER. As someone once said of the former baseball slugger Reggie Jackson, “There’s not enough mustard in this world to cover that hot dog.” And the same spplies to Obama.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 31, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Obama can not win the White House, if you Dem’s want to stop the war and win you better think of something to do and quick.This last little deal with the Priest really hurt Obama with white voters.How a grown man can act like that, what a joke, unbelieveable.

Posted by: tomjoad1776 | May 31, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Karela, you are absolutely right! I am from Florida. I feel disenfranchised by my state legislature which voted to move up the primary despite knowing what the consequences would be. I do not blame the candidates, but I am disgusted that Sen. Clinton is trying to change the rules in the middle (end) of the game. That goes against all values of fairplay. It is disgusting, and we should all be outraged!

Posted by: qbana70 | May 31, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Perhaps what the DNC needs to be united is a ticket with neither Hillary nor Obama on it. Would that solve the problem?

Posted by: jlynne | May 31, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

a pretty boy with a resume you could print on the back of his driver’s license, a Rolodex apparently limited to neosegregationist race-baiters, campus Marxist terrorists and indicted fraudsters, and a rhetorical surefootedness that makes Dan Quayle look like Socrates.
“On this Memorial Day,” said Barack Obama last Monday, “as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes – and I see many of them in the audience here today.”
Thanks Mark Steyn for explaining who Obama really is. BEST. DESCRIPTION. EVER.

Posted by: geevill | May 31, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Can you imagine her as President?
Yes, we can!!!!
And much more easily than Obama with his America-hating wife, his radical friends, and his racist (both Black and White) clergymen.
That I could never imagine.

Posted by: SandyB | May 31, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

I think it is too funny that so many on here pretend to be “fair” when all they want is to do is get their own way. I’ve got news for y’all; life is not fair. There are winners and losers all the time. It’s how we win and lose that defines us.

Posted by: MIguy | May 31, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

“Perhaps it’s because neither the Barack Obama campaign nor the media seem to understand what is at the heart of the anger on the part of women who feel that Hillary Clinton was treated unfairly because she is a woman or what is fueling the concern of Reagan Democrats for whom sexism isn’t an issue, but reverse racism is”
Obama could select Sebelius for his VP to shut that noise up.
Obama 08!

Posted by: red | May 31, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Are you suggesting that just because the Rules Committee is meeting that Obama’s Father Pfleger disgrace should be swept under the carpet?
I know that’s what the Obama people are trying to do, but if Hillary had to listen to accusations about the RFK comment for days and days, then Obama should have to take his comparative dose of medicine for the disgraceful remarks of his racist spiritual adviser and fellow church goers
As one other poster stated: “Fair is Fair.”

Posted by: SandyB | May 31, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

It does not matter if Obama took his name off the ballot or not. Come on people everyone knew that Mi and FL would not count and all the candidates agreed that they should not count. I am so sick of Hillary making her own rules. I agree that FL and MI votes should count but not the way Hillary would like. Seat the delegates and make it fair not the way Hillary want it she is not the QUEEN and she can not run everything! Hillary agreed that FL and MI should not be count so make it fair and let the rules not be broken without some type of punishment!

Posted by: Emilianna | May 31, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

I think what is really funny is that mc-more-war is the only republican still running and he’s only getting 60-70 percent of the vote in the primaries. Look for Obama to beat mc-more-war by a landslide this fall. Obama 2008!

Posted by: pt | May 31, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

PT
not so fast you know it wont be a landslide… as of now Obama is behind in most electoral maps… enthusiasm is one thing but reality is another!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

As a Hillary Democrat, my hope is to elect Hillary as the first Woman President of the United States of America. Hillary has the experience, record of accomplishment, and trust of the American people. In November, I will cast my vote for Hillary; hopefully, Hillary will be the nominee of the democratic party. If not, then my desire is to have a Hillary/Michael Bloomberg ticket.

Posted by: benvictor | May 31, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

SandyB,
No, I am not suggesting Father Pfleger’s comments should be swept under the rug.
I am saddened that John McCain issued a stronger statement against Father Pfleger’s rants–which I consider highly offensive, racist, and sexist–than either Obama or Father Pfleger.
I was just surprised to find the article today — but then again it was on Fox.

Posted by: jlynne | May 31, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Ya know what, seat all the delegates, let the chips fall where they may. At least then no one can say all 50 (not 57) states have spoken. WHy should any voters be penalized because of MI and Fla. Because if all 50 states are not counted, the DNC just handed the presidency over to McCain with a great big bow on it.

Posted by: char10145 | May 31, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Since when is any vote cast in an election in the this country only worth half?
The millions of American citizens in Florida and Michigan who went to the polls and cast their votes for their chosen candidate deserve to be heard. Since when do we not count each citizen’s vote in its entirety?
During the 1800s, African-American slaves in the southern states were counted as 1/2 of a person so that their white supremacist masters in these states could have more representation in Congress and were then able to pass their pro-slavery legislation for many years. The only problem was, these slaves were only counted for purposes of representation, and were not allowed to vote.
It sounds like this is what the DNC is trying to do now. They will allow Florida and Michigan delegates to be represented at the Convention, but do not want the votes that were cast in thsoe two states to count.

Posted by: SandyB | May 31, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Tim,
Obama did not have to take his name off the ballot in Michigan. Others didn’t. He knew he couldn’t win. He had every chance to do a revote with others paying for the revote. He didn’t. He preferred the caucus format, and we know why. The voters should not be punished by this subjectively applied rule the DNC came up with. Were they concerned about how those voters would feel in November? Obviously not. Lifelong Democrats across the country would be angry if their states were treated this way. They also are going to remember this “unethical” and lunatic decision.

Posted by: georgia | May 31, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

The super delegates should be focusing on who will win against McCain in November. Obama broke the rules in Florida by campaigning there through a television ad. He also told the people in Michigan to vote uncommitted after he took his name off. This is not the first time Obama has tried to stop people from voting. He did this same type of tactic in Illinois when running for the senate. If we want John McCain in the White House then continue with this foolishness. There will be another video surfacing and my guess is it will be coming out in October.
Hillary 08

Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 31, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

dem38,
the reality is that pre-GE polls don’t win the election. same way the pre-Primary didn’t materialize into a hillary clinton win.
Obama ’08!

Posted by: hope for change | May 31, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Well the boys of the Democratic Party should be thinking twice about who votes and the fact that obama was only in this to begin with to take Federal Money. If he changes that and accepts money from outside resources … he should be arrested and impeached from the Senate! He can join the rest of usz for breaking the law!

Posted by: Angry Black Man | May 31, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

I’m sure Hillary wants the Florida and Michigan votes to count as in. She went into those as an internationally known wife of an ex-president. With no campaigning in either state, neither vote is ‘fair’.
This older white woman from Florida is sick of hearing about various reasons why the previously unknown candidate stomped her run.
I think it’s unfair but fine, seat the FL delegation at half count.
Regarding MI, I can’t abide that anybody in their right would think most Americans would think a vote where several of the democratic candidates were not on the ballot is right in any way, shape or form. I don’t see any way those votes should count at all and think that should go 50/50.

Posted by: Angry Floridian | May 31, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Donna Brazille and other Obama supporters will not vote for anything that does not favor Obama or enhance his standing. How in God’s name did she ever get on this panel? When she first began her journey, she acted like she didn’t have a preference, but the longer I watched and listened it was clear she was for Obama. She has never been for Clinton.

Posted by: virginia | May 31, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

To the DNC …..Are you going to take the pay off from Obama or are you going to do whats right for the American people…….We are waiting to see if it’s about all the money Obama gave you or is it about the voters and who they voted for…Hillary 08 She Loves Respects and is Proud of Our Country….And is the only one that can beat McCain in Nov….Obama can not and will not get the states we need to win in Nov….

Posted by: PCC | May 31, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

What a damn mess.

Posted by: A reader in Georgia | May 31, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

dem38,
i meant to say the reality is that pre-GE polls don’t win the election. same way the pre-Primary polls didn’t materialize into a hillary clinton win.
Obama ’08!

Posted by: hope for change | May 31, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

I understand how Hillary can place her self ahead of the party and the country. But you who support her, how do you justify breaking the rules for her? I don’t understand why you risk letting the Republicans win yet again because of this woman and her hold over you. Maybe uneducated really means dumb although I never thought so before.

Posted by: Old Fashioned | May 31, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

THIER SHOULD HAVE BEEN A RE-VOTER WHO EVER HEARD OF SUCH A THING IN RECOUNT THE SE.OF STATE CERTIFIED THE ELECTION AND IS STOOD JUST LIKE THIS ONE WILL .

Posted by: Bishop | May 31, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

What makes people cynical about politicians? HRC supporter and DNC rules and bylaws committee member, Harold Ickes voted for a rule to penalyze states that do not obey the DNC schedule in 2007 when she was ahead to win the nomination. Now, when she is behind, not only is he against his own rule, but wants to penalize the candidate that obeyed it.
Wow, their audacity for duplicity!
He talks about it with no shame, and these lazy journalists don’t even expose him on it – every time he opens his mouth about this issue!
Unless we expose and get rid of people like Ickes from the political discourse, we the people will not be governed by decent people.

Posted by: selsm | May 31, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Dems Behind Closed Doors
Sooo, what else is new?????

Posted by: squatch501 | May 31, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Clinton supporters,
Please think about this logically. Are you meaning to say that Mrs. Clinton and her representatives had NO say in the formation of the rules for the current primary season? Yes, I’ll bet they did. Didn’t Mrs. Clinton say herself that Michigan wouldn’t count? Yes, she did. Now that they’re behind they want to change the rules.
Her argument that the Michigan delegation be seated as is also doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. Are you meaning to say that NO ONE in Michigan voted for Obama or any of the other candidates? If all votes should be counted, as Mrs. Clinton keeps saying, how about giving Obama some credit for the substantial number of “uncommitted” votes?
And as far as Pfleger’s stupid circus show, let’s say that BOTH candidates have had similar situations. The media – as well as both campaigns – need to quit indulging in this “gotcha” stupidity.

Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

The Democrat party is so split no wonder they can not win the White House.I am not Republican nor Democrat. I can not see voting for a party nor making one mark. The way I see it most of the Democrats are radicals. They need to settle down and unite. Until you get rid of people like Hillary and Bill there will always be some kind of trouble.

Posted by: sparky5876 | May 31, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Why didn’t they revote. They don’t have the right to leave FL. and MI out they know it that is why Sen. Spectior said he would hold hearing’s on this. Obama screwed himself when he took his name off the ticket he should have agreed to a revote plus Iowa NH NV and SC did the same thing.

Posted by: Bishop | May 31, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

No one has the right to tell someone that their vote in this country will not be counted…..Not anyone not even the DNC…..These are the laws of the land …Weather you like it or not….

Posted by: PCC | May 31, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Should of had a re-vote

Posted by: Bishop | May 31, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

That is an interesting flyer “Dems Eat Their Own:”
If Obama supporters were TOLD to vote Uncommitted, and the DNC is now willing to give him the votes and delegates for ALL “Uncommitted” votes that were cast (even if some were obviously cast for other candidates), what is he complaining about?????
If his supporters were told to select Uncomitted, then in a sense, his name WAS on the ballot.
And for that poster who was trying to say what a loser Hillary is because 40$ of the voters there voted “Uncommitted,” that would explain why they did. It was a vote for any one of several candidates.
And if Obama ran campaign ads in Florida, then he also broke the rules, so why are he and his campaign now making such a fuss over Michigan and Florida “braking the rules?”
This situation should have been a “do-over” from the start for both states, with both campaigns helping to pay for the cost.
Why should 30 members of the DNC Rules Committee get to decide what the votes of millions of voters in these two states actually represent????

Posted by: SandyB | May 31, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

A few months ago Ed Rendell and James Carville offered to raise the money to pay for a second primary in both Florida and Michigan, The DNC agreed to this deal as long as both candidates agreed. Clinton did– Obama didn’t!!
HILLARY 08

Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 31, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

And if Obama ran campaign ads in Florida, then he also broke the rules, so why are he and his campaign now making such a fuss over Michigan and Florida “braking the rules?”
*************************************
He didn’t run ads in FL. He ran ads in neighboring states some of which carried over into some of Fl neighboring counties.

Posted by: Thinking | May 31, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

if they give Clinton anything she should not get because people followed the rules we are done and so will all of they be since they pissed of the majority of Americans especially those who hold their future careers in their hands…who will still be alive in 2030…dealing with this dispicable Clinton campaign fall out.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Rendell and Carville know they have risked everything in their friendship to the Clinton’s and they also know what they have done has been old school politics…you can read on their faces how sorry they are that they are on this team rather than the other.
Get Bill and Hill out.
now.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I’d rather see Will and Jada Smith as President and First Lady, I’d rather see Colin Powell and his Wife, I’d rather see Denzel Washington and his Wife Pauletta Pearson in the White House, so many I would chose to be the first AA president. First class families, all of them. BO is a joke. I will vote McCain if Hillary is not the Dems nominee. McCain made such great comments yesterday about Hillary in regards to the rediculous Pflager rants. He had the decency and ba**s to say what BO SHOULD have said!

Posted by: Sharon | May 31, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Unstoppable ’08:
OF COURSE, he wouldn’t agree to the second primary then….
He was riding high from that long string of primary wins he had, and thought everything was going to continue going his way. What did he care then about what Michigan and Florida thought?
Then came Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, etc. etc.; and Reverend Wright, Bittergate, etc., etc., and has had a big wake-up call, and decides maybe he better be a little more flexible about Mighigan and Florida because if he is the nominee, he’ll need them in November.
Everybody makes such a big deal about how Hillary and her supporters have changed their minds about Michigan and Florida, well so has Obama………….

Posted by: SandyB | May 31, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

half the electorate would be great…
but that is not what they are quabbling over…
Hillary, Ickes and the rest want more.
because half doesn’t get them closer to overturning the rest of the state votes….
and yes that is despicable..

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Look… the DNC is an independent, non-governmental agency that by tradition and tradition alone ends up putting forth one of the two candidates that are the only possible contenders for President. The primaries are mere polls that help them determine who to select as a presidential candidate. They are under no obligation to follow the “mandates” of the primary system and have introduced superdelegates to subvert their own process with the stated purpose of preventing someone they don’t want from being the candidate. If the DNC changes their procedure to merely poll barbers in Oshkosh to determine who their candidate should be, it is just as valid as the current procedure. Enough of the “every vote must count” and bemoaning the “disenfranchisment” of the populations of two states who refused to follow instructions. We have no voting “rights” until the general election.

Posted by: Tad | May 31, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Since Richardson, Edwards and Obama were the only ones that took their names off the ballot in MI, and those people had no choice other than to vote ‘uncommitted’ if they wanted to vote for any of them, and now Richardson and Edwards both support Obama, then those votes, and those delegates go to him.
How’s that for new math HRC?

Posted by: Louis | May 31, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Sharon
I would rather see Leona Helmsley at this point than Hillary Clinton… old political power that fights for the individual power not the voters.
Too many great women out there to be voting for the woman who half have chosen because her last name…
we have done that before… remember and look where it got us.
Bush got in because of name recognition (and that he was a governor)…Hillary is riding on the same thing…and it would be a similar mistake

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Why would anyone vote for Obama—-my gosh WAKE UP AMERICA!!! He will certainly not be elected—Hillary would be the best to beat McCain and don’t count her out yet—-Bush won because of Florida and their acts and so why not let their delegates be counted!!! Hillary deserves for her votes to be counted… If Obama wins the nomination then it is most certain we will have a Republican in office.Do the American people want that??? 4 more years of the same ole Bush—–look what has happened since Bush was in office—can we afford another 4 years….

Posted by: Linda B | May 31, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

They raised 30million this could have been done and over with .

Posted by: Bishop | May 31, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

BO took his name OFF the MI ballot so he could go pander to Iowa and NH voters and say, “See, I’m with you, I took my name off the MI ballot, just to support Iowa and NH as the FIRST states to decide the primaries.” And it worked. He won Iowa, he’s a panderer. He’s a manipulator, going back to the dispicable way he removed his competition in IL.

Posted by: Sharon | May 31, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Advertising is very expensive and only runs in the markets you are hoping to influence. It is the same as when you get ads in your Sunday newspaper; every area receives different ads depending on what they are trying to promote in your area.

Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 31, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Luckily the other campaigns who took their names off the ballot will have a say and tell the TRUTH about why the names were coming off the ballot…Ickes can spin it all he wants … when the rest of the campaigns get up and back Obama and tell them that Hillary is playing a game at the risk of the party…and the issues… this will be done…
If it didn’t then this wouldn’t be the great country that it is.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Mark, I will tell you one thing. If Obama is nominated I will vote for McCain. But I am a registered Independent anyway. I think the democrats could take lessons from the republicans on how to run a primary. All of this mess with the dnc is a bunch of crap anyway.

Posted by: dj jones | May 31, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

I don’t think the delegates should be seated from MI and FL They knew in advanced that they would be penalized when FL and MI moved their primaries, They should have made a fuss about it at that time!

Posted by: IslandGirl | May 31, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

dem 38: then explain how Clinton and Obama differ on policies in any substantive way.

Posted by: Tired of Idiots | May 31, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

dem38
Obama copying Bush’s run …really…
because they focused on the issues? No they didn’t they focused on trying to tear down the character of the other party and candidate…
sound familiar.
Hillary has run that cmapaign through and through.
Oh you mean that Obama is running on “uniting”… yeah…the people want that…that might be why he is running on it… because it is true.
That is where the similarities end.
Bush ran on his name… anyone with half a brain knows that…guess what another similarity to Hillary.
Obama is more like Bill Clinton’s first campaign…the young outside smart dem who has the right message for the time.
Don’t make up things like Obama is like Bush… Bush even ran on his “experience” being with his association to his father and family…his team was built out of his relatives old netwrok…sound familiar?…he knows how it’s done because of that experience when his dad like her husband was in office.
and guess what…he knew how the campaigning was done too bad he didn’t have the judgement…sound familiar.
so get a real argument instead of something that really plays badly for your candidate.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Wasnt it the black votes that put Clinton into office?
Do you think these black voters will vote for Hillary in the GE if she STEALS the nomination from Obama??

Posted by: IslandGirl | May 31, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

dem 38: I guess you’re saying he’s taken his positions from Hillary. Even if that were true they would have the same positions. Hence, why won’t you support him?

Posted by: Tired of Idiots | May 31, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Obama should get no delegates in Michigan. he chose to take his name off the ballot.
Those were not the RULES and no one asked him to. He CHOSE to.
Why would someone who disrespected the voters of Michigan by pulling his name from the ballot in order to gain favour in IOWA be give any delegates and the person who had respect for the voters of Michigan have delegates taken away from her?
This is why the dems will lose in Nov. Their whole nominating process is a sham and they care nothing for democracy or voters.
Well voters will let them know what they think in Nov. Certainly FL, MI and women will.

Posted by: s.b. | May 31, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Should of had a revote

Posted by: Bishop | May 31, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

And this is the democratic process we push on the rest of the world and we cant even get it right here at home, they look at us and say our dictator system works a whole lot better !!!

Posted by: jg5012 | May 31, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

SandyB,
“He was riding high from that long string of primary wins he had, and thought everything was going to continue going his way. What did he care then about what Michigan and Florida thought?”
That’s a lie and you know it. How do you expect anyone to believe that Obama would not have LOVED to have campaigned in both Michigan and Florida? He could’ve won both states handily had he been allowed to campaign.
Obama has demonstrated that his campaign had a plan, a winning message of hope and a winning strategy. Hillary was the only one who didn’t have enough foresight to run her campaign. She said those votes didn’t matter. She said only the big states count. She said she wasn’t interested in the caucuses.
That was then… Roll tape to today. Now she regrets her statements because she realizes she does indeed need our votes. Obama knew he needed them from day 1, so stop blaming him for winning.
Obama 08

Posted by: its about this country | May 31, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Dem38
Obama doesn’t have the 30 second soundbite…but you probably have never read his policies or platform huh…
so who is the idiot.
Our problems can’t be solved in the 30 sec soundbite like Clinton is good at and if they sound like they can …be wary.
healthcare for instance …
the biggest problems are shortage of nurses, family docs, and surgeons, billing and malpractice rates through the roof
Hillary’s policy makes all of these worse without addressing them directly…(oh besides she throws in electronic billing)
she does not look at the problems that occur with a plan like medicare…which inflates these problems 10 fold…ask Massachusetts…and will have to raise the costs.
so before you start calling people idiots…maybe you should do some research
Not to mention her plan can’t pass…but she would never concede Obama is right it is about cost first and then universality…you can’t get universality until costs are under control.
she is about winning…not about solutions…and that is in the details…and I would hope you would choose the candidate that brings together the best ideas no matter who they are from rather than the person who you knew as first lady for 15 years.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

When I was was doing exams in college, I didn’t perform well on some of them because my strategy going into the exam was not well planned out. I took more time on some questions than I should of and then bamm, I ran out of time. On hindsight, if I should of jumped on other questions instead of staying on one too long and the results of the test would have been a lot better. The rules said I had 2 hours to do the test but I ran out of time and I kick myself for not planning my game plan very well. But I have no choice; I suck it up and accept the results because those were the rules and it was made for everyone to keep it fair.

Posted by: Ed | May 31, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

They were willing to “raise” the money
not write a personal check. Since I am a Clinton supporter,I will refrain from personal attacks. I want to show the same strength and character she has shown through this entire process. She speaks for the average American.
Hillary 08

Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 31, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

You count all the votes people are funny. This primary stuff is like pro sports. The parties make up their own rules and the government sanctions that the actual voting process was done ethically. This has nothing to do with voting in elections and one person, one vote.
The fact that primaries force you in many cases to register with a party is proof that artificial rules govern these things. That we have a caucus is proof that artificial rules apply.
The only litigation here is whether the party violated its rules governing the primaries.
Nobody is being prevented from voting. The issue is what do we do since the Clinton crew of “brain surgeons” and “rocket scientists” said last year and a few years ago that the votes would not count toward a normal amount of delegates. If the penalty to the states was that none should count, then it should be none. To say that Obama gets nothing from Michigan is stupid and a non-starter.
The popular vote is mucked up because caucus vote tallies are missing and Obama’s totals in Michigan and Florida don’t reflect what was going on. I’m not saying he would have won but I know the numbers are not real.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | May 31, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

dem38: surely you don’t want to go down the associations road supporting Clinton. I fear you and many of those who won’t support Obama are either racists or sexists. I can see no other reason for someone who supports Clinton’s professed policy ideas not to find Obama nearly as attractive.

Posted by: Tired of Idiots | May 31, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Anything besides the full seatings of MI and FL delegates is a win for Obama.
Saying that, I believe the ruling will definitely favor Obama.
Delegates = 1/2 vote and Michigan 50/50
Win for Obama

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Should of had a revote

Posted by: Bishop | May 31, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

tired of idiots
because to trained political observers he comes across as an empty suit but ambitious and that wont fly!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Hmmm … I am wondering if we should give the rest of the others 57 states that I cannot find on the electoral map 1/2 vote for each of the virtual “delegate”.

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

I hope they only seat half because then we can go to the floor .

Posted by: Bishop | May 31, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Denver !!! Denver !!! Denver !!!

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Clinton supporter need to face facts and help the De. party win the GE. Even if the DNC did everything Clinton desired she will still not win the nomination. The SDs will move to Obamas side by next weeks end and that’s most likely the outcome. If you are a spoiled looser and want to join McCain then go for it. Fox and the Rep party will welcome you. McCain needs help. There will be enough voters crossing over to the Dem side to make up your loss and more. Obama will tear McCain up on debates and McCain will probably beat himself.

Posted by: CW | May 31, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

You know I would be justified to complain to my parents that my siblings got something I didn’t.
But you know what there are things more important than myself…
Unfortunately Hillary and Bill have never learnedthat
I ask the question again…name once where Hillary took a hit for the good of anything that didn’t benefit herself.
Both McCain and Obama have given something up (large in their lives) for the good of those they are fighting for (Obama fought for people on the street and out of work before AND after harvard law, McCain served in the military)
what did Hillary ever do that wasn’t calculated to advance her? That she actually took a hit for.
You can’t…because she hasn’t… as this primary shows as Michigan and Florida shows (she didn’t care about these voters until it meant she personally was losing, or the WAR, or this long primary, the lincoln bedroom issues the FBI files issues, etc)
She is a fighter…a fighter for Hillary Clinton’s career.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Bishop
that was always the plan and the good Dr dean is gonna walk right into it!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Sounds about right…big issue to settle, go behind closed doors, no decision. Visionary, decisive, just… not yet. What, was Starbuck’s closed?

Posted by: jggrimm | May 31, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Well i know what i will and thousands like me will do if we are forced to do in Nov….Obama is unelecable and it’s as plan as the nose on your face …People are and will not vote for the unknown…These are Facts wait and see if Obama is the nominee come Nov…McCain will be the next President….And i will be happy to vote for McCain over Obama…Obama has nothing to offer….He offers nothing but words that are wrote for him…Hillary 08

Posted by: PCC | May 31, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

CW
it wont happenn the elite committee members will vote to give half the delegates and that is an automatic appeal for clinton and you will accept it!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

mark
clinton people are half of your vote in nov so you better be nice or go away… you wont win on your own right anyway!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

When the committé comes out to award the delegates for FL and MI full seating at the convention, Clinton should immediately offer Obama the VP to bridge the divid.
Clinton 08!

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 31, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Dl
ok to start with he doesnt go far enough on health care he should include 100 percent of the people in universal healthcare no exceptions

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Why don’t we just give it to McCain NOW!
Why waste any more time or money on this DNC fiasco?
Throw in the towel become an independent an the heck with the DEM PARTY! We should all be independents!
Obama can not win the GE!
Never vote OBAMA, NEVER!

Posted by: HP Boston | May 31, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

dem38:
You obviously want Hillary. I did about a year ago at this time. Over time I realized that she was no different from Bill except that apparently she doesn’t sleep around. The Clinton lies really started to pour once this got going though and I am sick of it.
To the primaries. Why is Obama being punished for following the rules that Hillary’s crew set up? This points to a clear Clinton flaw in negotiating treaties. Obama is somehow accused of “stealing the primary election.” IF anything Hillary lost it because she was prepared on Day One, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150. Perhaps she is better prepared now but she is still behind–that is called losing.
Also, what is this Obama is flawed because he speaks at ticketed events?? He speaks at ticketed events because he draws so many people at these things that seating has to be arranged so that people aren’t hurt due to shuffling around–local fire departments likely required this as well as past rock concert experience. It is called planning and being smart–concerned about human welfare not just politics. Another reason why I am for Obama.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | May 31, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

DL–amen.
You could make the same argument with her husband.
They have a sense of entitlement, that they are OWED the presidency.
It is time to get rid of the Clintons.
I’m happy with an Obama/McCain election. Two guys that care, have competence, and both have POSITIVE visions for the country and don’t rely on racism and/or fear to fuel their campaigns.

Posted by: jim | May 31, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

dem38
you threaten Obama voters with walking away if they “aren’t nice”
and you just referred to people as idiots…
Maybe you should start practicing what you preach.
Hillary needs voters too…because as it is she may disappear into oblivion after this because she had a low ceiling and high floor to begin with and there is a very good chance she is not going abck to ANY office.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

mr cofee behind now but at the convention he wont make it past the second ballot and we wont give up…–FACT!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

DL
go ahead and vote for mccain you are in the same predicament and you cant dictate! Obama wont win on his on anyway thats our point!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

dem38- This may be true but at that point Hillary will pretty much remove herself from any good standings with the Dem. party and the appeal would go in front of a board that sits about 75 percent Obama supporters on its board. The Clinton legacy would be that they devided the Dem party and because of that probably lost the GE for the Dem party. Good by any chances in 2012 or 2016. She loves the Dem party and dont think she will ruin that.

Posted by: CW | May 31, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

jim
Obama cant win and it will be a faarce in the GE

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

This has to go to the convention, it’s that close. To end it before is an Obama idea where he continue the path he began in Chicago. It’s easy to win elections if you use the rules and tactics to prevent opponents from appearing on election day. Obama is a thug, he’s done it before.
Clinton has to face this bully, he is not presidential material. I don’t see why the superdelegates should reward the kind of negative campaign he ran. There is nothing left of the three Obama pillars of change, bridging the divide and hope. Obama breaks the mole on divisive.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 31, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

CW
Nope the full committee has about half clinton voters -FACT and she will win in a GE matchup as an independant with less than a plurality but thats life!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Dems
no that is the point they dont you are wrong

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

dem38
you have to get costs under control first before universal healthcare…otherwise it won’t pass and more importantly it won’t work
period
look at Mass…and that is a state with a huge healthcare resource…what do you think would happen in states like Mississippi and Kentucky…where universal healthcare is really needed.
The worst billing in the healthcare field is Medicare…a large bureaucratic system… universal healthcare introduced as Hillary has laid it out will destroy our system…think how hard it is to get a family doc…now and the issues with nurses and that their salaries are going through the roof (rightfully)
Hillary is doing what she always does…making the statements that get someone elected in 30 second soundbiites…we can’t do that anymore… It’s what Bush did.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

just another excuse… um even if they award half the delegates of both it moves the goal posts to 2100 to clinch -Fact…. that was espoused by the Obama News Network Msnbc this morning… so it aint gonna be over June 3rd get it!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

and dem38
Hillary couldn’t win in her strongest demographic…the dem party… she hasd a low ceiling and high floor…now she has pissed off half of that group… how do you come to the idea that she is the stronger candidate?
When you take apart the real numbers …not the ones in the heat of a primary where obama’s are similar to Bill Clinton’s numbers in 92…which proved false)… he is hands down the better candidate.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

dl
healthcare is non negotioable,… Obama is doing that because of unnamed corporate insurance contributors!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

DL
the Independant run that they have planned out is modeled on the 92 run the only thing similar to Bill Clinton that Obama has in regards to 92 is his youth period!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

dem38
if you look at the real numbers…they include a highest watermark for defections during these primaries…which NEVER shape up to be true…
it is still going to be a blow out chances are for obama…Hillary never saw a blow out coming…that is the difference…and now she has pissed offf even more people.
her approvals were 52% to START.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

This will all be over by this time next week.
Obama will be our nominee. Hillary will campiagn for him and bridge the gap between her and his supporters.
Obama will win come November and that’s that.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

dem38
with regard to healthcare
Obama is doing that because he is right.
…and unlike hillary who says she has fought for poor people she has no idea what their lives are really like…
a proposal to take a mandatory stipend with a tax break?
does she know who the people she is supposedly helping with universality are…
these are people choosing monthly to pay their rent or food…or deciding between the two … rather than healthcare.
They do not understand tax breaks…they fill out 1040 ez’s if anything.

Posted by: dl | May 31, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

if you were truly a trained political observer you’d understand that the differences in their health care plans are trivial compared to the changes that will get made as a part of the legislative process. But, as I’ve said, I’m….

Posted by: Tired of Idiots | May 31, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

This is the most insane thing I have ever heard of.
Question: If everything was held constant except Obamas lead, would this be an issue?

Posted by: BlackNAmerica | May 31, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Obama blocked a re-vote and is no longer from a legal tradition point of view able to advocate counting in another way than what we have, in Michigan 55% Clinton and 40% uncommitted. If he was unhappy with this, he should have accepted a re-count.
Instead i wanted to stop count itself which is against Dems rule, and more important the higher rule above stating “one voter, one vote”.
In the end, this is about us, our democracy and our rules.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 31, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Man, I hope that this goes all the way to the convention floor in August! This is an exciting and energizing democratic process. Its not dividing, its AWESOME!!!

Posted by: PhillyPaul | May 31, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Amazing to me that anyone would agree with stripping FL and MI of their delegates. Nothing in a democracy may interfere with the right of every citizen to vote. This is a DEMOCRACY. Make an exception based on Party “rules” and we are lost. “The Party” does not have a right to strip any citizen of their vote. Punish the party, not the voters. The Party is not a parent. The voters are not children.
Next time, it might be YOUR candidate whose supporters’ votes are taken away. Do you not realize this?

Posted by: Steven Mac | May 31, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

I cannot imagine either socialist party candidate being president. On the one hand you have a power hungry control freak. While on the other hand you have a radical with racist “friends”. Some choice…..
Bring back Jimy Carter!

Posted by: Scott | May 31, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Sen. Clinton’s huge 43 point in win in West Virginia, and 30 point win in Nebraska, should open the eyes of those DNC insiders, I hope. She’s now ahead in popular vote too. Florida and Michigan is still unresolved! Considering Sen. Obama has not won even one single major battle-ground state, like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Texas, New York, California, New Jersey, Massachusetts and so on and on, his most wins have come from caucuses, where small groups of zealots (MoveOn.Org people) operating to manipulate them. Sen. Obama got a large proportion of delegates for the small number of votes received in these caucus states! But that’s not going to help in the general election. You can figure out for yourself, what really matters in the general election and which Democratic candidate is stronger and more electable? If you look at the Electoral College stands as of right now, Clinton vs. Obama. These are “winner-take-all” electoral votes for each state, general election calculations. Florida and Michigan is not considered.
Clinton 261
Obama 181
Include Florida and Michigan;
Clinton 305
Obama 181
Let’s say with Clinton winning Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Obama winning North Carolina, South Dakota, Oregon and Montana, would then be, even without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 285
Obama 209
Even if you give Indiana, to Obama, the totals would be, still without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 274
Obama 220
We all know it takes 270 Electoral College votes to win the General Election. This shows which of the Democratic candidates is better able to win in the General Election. Sen. Obama also lacks support among women voters, Reagan Democrats, working class average Americans, Latinos, union members, older Americans and so on. Sen. Clinton would make a much stronger candidate to face Republican John McCain in the general election. African American black voters and city dwellings liberals have never won presidential elections for Democrats. Sen. Obama is too weak to win the presidency for Democrats! Therefore if Sen. Obama is the Democratic nominee, it would be a big mistake! The media is trying hard to anoint Sen. Obama as the democratic nominee, just like the way it took us over the cliff in Iraq!

Posted by: Mr.Nurkle | May 31, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

What’s happening today has to do with whether or not we are still a democracy. After watching RFK Jr’s video comments on the media (which was pulled down almost immediately), I am well aware that five men control 85% of the media in this country–including ALL of the networks, over 80% of the newspapers, and over 90% of the internet news sources. Pay attention. Democracy is in danger–if, in fact, it still exists at all. GUARD YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE.

Posted by: V in CA | May 31, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

I don’t know why Hillary supporters are making a fuss over this.
Is it b/c this is her ONLY way of having a particle valid argument for the nomination?
If FL and MI delegates are seated so will their votes.
It’s possible that Clinton can win the popular vote but there’s a problem.
It’s a delegate race. We know, she knows, and so does the SDs.
She will lose the delegate race and therefore lose the nomination either way you count it.
Al Gore won the popular vote in the 2000 election and still lost.
That’s why we have the magic number 2026 which will likely increase with the addition of MI and FL.
By this time next week Obama will have locked in the nomination. All this bickering should stop.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Demanding to change the rules now and to seat the delegates that are not supposed to be seated at all looks like a man/woman marked 5 numbers in Lotto – and insists that those numbers to be counted in Powerball…

Posted by: toroid | May 31, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

So the Democratic “Star Chamber” cannot agree on whether or not our (the people’s) votes are important. What’s to argue about? Florida’s votes should be counted and Michigan should have a re-vote (because Obama was not on the ticket). Why is this so complicated?

Posted by: Rhys | May 31, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Vanessa, many citizens are concerned over “this” because “this concerns whether or not every citizen does, indeed, have a right to have their vote counted.
It’s a much larger issue than FL and MI and Obama and Clinton.
Educate yourself.

Posted by: Lady VT | May 31, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Here we go again, another Florida problem. What is it with that state? If it’s not hanging chads, or knowing how to vote properly, now it seems they do not know how to follow rules.
The only fair way to proceed is for the DNC to stick to their decision! Otherwise states will end up repeating this mess! The only reason we are making a big stink about this is because of cry baby Clinton!

Posted by: IndieVisible | May 31, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Delegates “not supposed to be seated”? America is telling other countries they should change to a democracy, but what has happened to OURS?! The entire convention process should be abolished and primary elections should be BINDING. There would be no need for delegates or so-called SUPER delegates. What hogwash! Why are some of us allowed to vote while others are not? America’s nomination procedure is severely out-of-order.

Posted by: Rhys | May 31, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

DL
I dont care Obama cant get to universal health care the way he does it and tax breaks for health savings accts are bogus!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

V in CA
yea it wont matter anyway 3 weeks before the election we might be in martial law because of Iran!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

vanessa
if it increases then Obama cant reach the new number by next week—-FACT

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

The VOTERS of Florida did nothing wrong, so why are they being “punished”? They voted when they were told to vote according to their state’s election laws. The DNC power brokers should NOT have ANY power over individual voters. This is just plain WRONG and dictatorial. Why do our Federal election laws allow such a travesty of democracy? And if Barack Obama was excluded from the Michigan ballot, the FEC should REQUIRE a re-vote, whose results would be binding.
Why are so many people having trouble understanding that American citizens should have the right to vote?

Posted by: Rhys | May 31, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Posted by jlynne: “Apparently, the rules committee meeting is not enough to keep more from coming out on the good Father…”
As we both know, there is considerably more to the Fox report than what you included in your post.
More of the story:
Pfleger is a white priest at a largely black church. He’s held hands with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. He’s been arrested dozens of times and battled anyone he thinks has wronged his parish — from gun dealers to a local Catholic sports league.
Pfleger has donated to Obama’s state Senate and presidential campaigns, and sat on a Catholics for Obama committee until a few weeks ago. When Obama was in the Illinois Legislature, he helped land more than $200,000 in state grants for outreach programs run by Pfleger’s church.
The relationship between Obama and Pfleger has been a long one.
Pfleger has donated $1,500 to Obama’s campaigns for state office and another $1,500 to his presidential campaign.
Obama cited Pfleger, along with Wright, as one of his spiritual advisers in a 2004 Chicago Sun-Times story. Pfleger helped Obama’s Iowa campaign by taking part in a faith forum.
In March, St. Sabina gave Wright a hero’s welcome after Pfleger invited him to give the benediction.

Posted by: LJ | May 31, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

torid
dont you know the are at this moment debating wheter to give superdelegates and pledged delegates equal votes that will turn Obamas estimate on its head!

Posted by: dem38 | May 31, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

If it increases Obama can reach the new number by next week. Its been no hidden fact that a large majority of the remaining SDs have decided on Obama.
Their waiting for June 3 or beyond… possibly a week to endorse him.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

I am just ready to move on — Ohio voted for Hillary and we look forward to voting McCain in November. More and more we are beginning to like what we see in McCain. We would rather have the moderate McCain to the liberal Obama with ranting friends.

Posted by: voter | May 31, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Yes, Toroid, I am a Hillary supporter, but I also believe that if Obama was excluded from a ballot, that state should have a re-vote WITH Obama on the ballot. Even though you believe Hillary supporters should be “punished”, I don’t believe Obama supporters should be excluded, either. The party bosses in their “smoke-filled rooms” should NOT determine who will be our next President; the PEOPLE should! The Democratic Star Chamber should have NO place in the American political process. (And neither should the Republican bosses.)
The only “rules” should be election LAWS. Period.

Posted by: Rhys | May 31, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Mr.Nurkle-
Flawed Logic!
Just because a state voted for Ms.Clinton in the primary does not mean that the state will vote Democrat in the general election. If you follow your line of logic correctly you will find that a lot of the states she won are states that have never (in recent memory),and will never go Democratic come November.
Hillary (like Bill) is a Republican in sheeps clothing, and absolutely does NOT represent chnge in any signifigant way.
Unfortunately for Hillary supporters, the only scenarios that give her the nomination must include this type of flawed logic, or they will be forced to admit that this is all over but for the crying.
Denial is one of the more difficult emotional problems to overcome, but it’s time to face the music, and stick a fork in it.
Sorry.

Posted by: SteveS | May 31, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Vanessa,
That’s the exact right cavilier attitude we have come to expect from the Obama campaign. You could care less about Florida and Michigan voters, you only care “if” the delegate count increases. That’s the type of arrogance that we would expect to see in the upcoming “general caucus”. By the way, where do I go to participate in the “general caucus”?
=======================================
Obama and BitterGate, we shall not forget!
=======================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 31, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Florida has got to be getting tired of this. DNC didn’t want all of GWB’s votes counted, now they don’t want anyone’s votes counted. DNC is telling Floridians one of two things. 1) – “We have written you off and we don’t care what you think” 2)- “We’ll do your thinking for you.” … Face it Florida, either way, Democrats don’t like you, don’t trust you and certainly don’t respect you.

Posted by: Royce | May 31, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

A few weeks ago, Nancy Pelosi said we need to “fix” the Primary procedure. I’m not sure what she proposes, but America’s primary elections should all be held on a Federally-specified date, just like the general election. Caucuses and conventions should be abolished. This year is a perfect example of what a mess our primary process has become, with a few party bosses determining the outcomes in both major parties.

Posted by: Rhys | May 31, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Hillary Clinton believes the SDs will decide by next week.
Both camps are aware of each SD stance. That’s why Obama is confident he’ll be the nominee by next week and why the Clinton camp is pushing to have her offered the VP spot.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Looks like the DNC has not received the message = MCCAIN 08
Their golden candidate will be defeated – and with more proof he has a 20 year relationship with anti-white hate mongers – it is a done due.

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Count all the people who vote, seat all the delegates – that simple.
We all know why Obama took off his name in Michigan. It’s beacause he was anticipating a defeat there. He should get zero votes and zero delegates there. Uncommitted is not equal to an Obama vote.

Posted by: Mae | May 31, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Rhys – I cannot agree with you more – a revote in both states (because you cannot call a FL campaign an equal for both candidates) would’ve been the best outcome. Sadly, it didn’t happen. So what now, then – reverse the rules? Doesn’t sound fair to me. If you flank the exam – they might give you a chance to retake the test – not just correct your numbers to get you a passing score…

Posted by: toroid | May 31, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

It astounds me that people act like Hillary is down and out with no supporters, and no reason to stay in the race! That she should just quietly leave the race, and bow to the saccharin Obama. As an obvious reminder, over 17,000,000 people have voted for Hillary and want her to stay in the race.
She is in the race still because she has a very real possibility of winning the popular vote! Which in a democracy would mean if more people want her to be president, she will be president. I believe some people may be scared Obama can’t win.
Lastly, she is not changing the rules. The DNC have rules set-up to challenge decisions. She is following the rules that the DNC set-up and challenging the decision. Furthermore Hillary certainly is not making the decision. If, through the DNC’s own rules they change their decision…then the DNC would be changing the rules and not Hillary. In any event the DNC rules state that Florida and Michigans violations are reprimanded with a minimum of 1/2 their votes being stripped.

Posted by: michael | May 31, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Listen is right. Now explain the difference between the political ideals and goals of Barrack Obama and those of Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: Royce | May 31, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Obama has already proved that he will do and say anything to get elected (Rev Wright even admits that)…
CNN did a segment the other night about how Obama got his state senate seat, by taking in a bunch of lawyers and challenging any names on the petitions of the incumbent, a very popular black social activist in the community, named Alice Palmer. Obama knew he couldn’t beat her so he had his team of lawyers go through every signature and if it wasn’t done right it was thrown out.
Even if the name was in cursive instead of printed, it was thrown out! He got enough thrown off so she couldn’t run.
That’s how he got his senate seat.
Impressive, huh? Not.
It speaks volumes about what lengths Obama will go to to get elected.
Watch him like a hawk.

Posted by: Jo | May 31, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Oh and one more thing.
Guess who the black social activist Alice Palmer is supporting? Hillary Clinton. Of course.
She of all people knows what a complete jerk Obama is.

Posted by: Jo | May 31, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

This is Chicago style politics at its best – the DNC is corrupt.
Anyone research Obama in Chicago, anyone see the CNN investigative report on how Obama does away with his opponents? He takes voters names off of petition. This guy doesn’t give a rats a** about voters – only him winning. He will do anything to win.
We must stand together to defeat this guy.

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

The United States is so extremely fortunate that Howard Dean never made it to the office of the president. I would rather watch and listen to 10 hours of Bush than 5 minutes of Dean. He, along with Pelosi and Reid, are the most inept leaders in history. After they selected and anointed Obama mindful of treating him with kid gloves and blatantly disrespecting Hillary, they now want us to come together for the sake of the Democratic Party? Not this dem!
McCain 2008 – Yes We Can!!

Posted by: Cap | May 31, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Obama is a complete fraud and not a man to respect.
And what he did to Alice Palmer is proof of that.
He’s a political sheister of the worst kind. He won’t clean up anything. He plays dirty to get what he wants.
President McCain – get use to it.

Posted by: Jo | May 31, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Cap,
Yes, I just keep remembering that the same people who love Obama were the same freaks who loved Howard Dean.
That tells you all you need to know.
President McCain – yes we can!!

Posted by: Jo | May 31, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

It’s fairly clear that the DNC is going to ram Obama down our throats, whether we voted for him or not.
Meanwhile, the Republicans put forth a weak candidate, anticipating a shoe-in Democratic victory with Hillary Clinton, and not wanting to “waste” a possible future Republican nominee.
It’s ironic that the Republicans COULD have won in November with a better candidate, but now they have Old Man Waffle running against Mr. Empty-Suit Charisma. This is a choice?!?!
While this farce has been playing out, we are being told that our votes don’t count anyway.
Instead of forcing democracy on countries which don’t want it, let’s repair our own!

Posted by: Rhys | May 31, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

To Listen, et al:
If those are your beliefs, I respect them, however I would suggest that if that is how you feel, than an admitted Republican might be a better choice for you than a closet one, I think Mr.McCain would wholeheartedly agree with you.
The rest of us are tired of living under the rule of a Plutocratic Oligarchy and are in the mood for some actual, meaningfull change leading us back to a government of, by, and for the people.

Posted by: SteveS | May 31, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Don’t worry Hillary supporters. You will be put out of your misery by this time next week.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

CAN SOMEONE ANSWER THIS NO KIDDING, DID THE FOLKS IN THESE TWO STATES NOT KNOW THAT THERE DELEGATES WOULD NOT COUNT IF THEY HELD THERE RACE TO EARLY? OR DID THE DEMS(GASP)LIE TO THE VOTERS OF THESE TWO STATES? IF THE RULES WERE LAID OUT AND FLA/MICH WENT AND HELD THE RACE EARLY THEN BOO-HOO TO BAD, TAKE OUT YOUR PROBLEMS WITH THEM AT THE POLLS IN NOVEMBER.

Posted by: RIC | May 31, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

I have never seen anyone in my lifeor heard anyone punished for simple respecting rules,and beside i suspect the CLINTONS the way there are fighting this thing.There are not oly been mocked in AMERICA BUT IT IS NOW WORLD WIDE.American use to be respected around the world but now there are the last andi think to regain that pride which i dont hope have to do away with pple who are running for president for personal interest,and what is even more strane is that MR OBAMA is blamed for verything any body on earth says,i think even if some one divoce his wife,lost a job,steal,kill,MR OBAMA WILL BE blam,its shameful for pple claiming to be living in a morden democracy.

Posted by: sinota | May 31, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Roxanne, and you guys will be toast in November. That means you have another 5-6 months to live in your fairy tale.
Enjoy.

Posted by: Jo | May 31, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

joyner could have memorized her speech instead of reading her argument for florida. she’s poorly reading the speech at that. keeps waiting for applause, but it rarely comes.
anybody out there know of another news channel that isn’t the clinton news network (CNN)? is th dnc meeting being aired on C-span or ABC?

Posted by: learn to read | May 31, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Well I suppose DNC committee members, super delegates, Washingon insiders, lobbyists, special interest groups, wheelers and dealers are a kind of Democracy?

Posted by: LongT | May 31, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

I think they’re desperately looking for chads that are hanging around to help decide what to do.

Posted by: bob | May 31, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

I was only 10 years old when Harry Truman defeated Tom Dewey for President, but it’s a lesson that NO one should ignore. Just because a candidate APPEARS to be “guaranteed” victory doesn’t mean it will happen.
The general election is the ONLY remaining venue in which WE have anything to say about who will be our President. You party bosses in your respective Star Chambers might want to think about this.
My wife and I would have definitely voted for Clinton this November, but now it seems we must “hold our noses” and vote for McCain.

Posted by: Rhys | May 31, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Howard Dean says he wants to unite the party. There is no way a man who sat in a church for 20 years that teaches hate unite the party or the country. Hillary has proven that she can work across sthe aisle to get things done. Obama has not.

Posted by: BARBANEL | May 31, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

We know Obama has excluded votes before so he could “win” his seat in Illinois and we won’t let him do that to our country again. A vote is a vote not half a vote. Thank you for standing up for all the people in Florida and Michigan!!
Hillary 08

Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 31, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Howard Dean is to the working class, middle income and female democrats as Scott McClellan is to George Bush. A sellout! Both have bitten off the loyal hand that fed them for a long time. I’m a true believe of what comes around goes around and this will be evidenced in November with the electing of President McCain.

Posted by: Cap | May 31, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

If “American Idol” can put up their second-best, then why not the Democratic Party?
Maybe THAT’S their “logic”!

Posted by: Rhys | May 31, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

By the way, hasn’t one of the main problems with the current administration been that they have refused to follow the rules, and when that doesn’t work they have changed the rules retroactively.
Let’s be VERY clear…Florida and Michigan were told if they violated party rules, their delegates would not be seated, and Yes the DNC has the right to do this. It is not a “national election”, it is a selection process of the Democratic Party.
Also, popular vote is irrelevant. It is true that this may not appear fair, but this is a race for delegates, and it is clear how that will turn out.
If you don’t like the rules, than get involved and change them.
Meanwhile, just to be clear once again…
THE DNC SETS THE RULES FOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY CANDIDATE SELECTION, and THIS IS A RACE FOR DELEGATES NOT POPULAR VOTE!

Posted by: SteveS | May 31, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

All the votes should count in Florida and Michigan. Obama chose to take his name off the ballot in Michigan. Florida’s election was moved up by the Republicans, not the Democrats. There is no reason all the votes in Florida should not count. If a voter votes one vote it should count. There should be no superdelegates. If no candidate reaches the number of delegates needed to win the nomination, the candidate who wins the popular vote should be the nominee. If the superdelegates do not go with the popular vote they are overturning the will of the people.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 31, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

If the popular vote doesn’t count, why vote?

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 31, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

This is beyond ridiculous. Obama obeys the rules and he gets penalized, Hillary disobeys the rules and gets rewarded. What a crock! She is getting rewarded because she is now getting her way like a spoiled brat on the floor kicking and screaming. Why is it the DNC hasn’t just told her that the rules are the rules and need to be followed? Even the voters in these two states knew they were voting in a ‘beauty contest’ that their vote didn’t count, and so did the Clintons and the Clinton campaign. Why is the DNC afraid of her and Bill? She also doesn’t want the states Obama won counted in the popular vote. HA! All those caucus states he won where people actually voted and voted for him the Clintons want to disenfranchise those voters, they say those states do not matter, that they do not count. How can this be allowed? It is not unfair, IT IS CRIMINAL!! Why hasn’t someone shut her up whenever she belches she has won all the votes? HA! What a joke. What a fiasco. What a waste of time, people and democracy. Clinton does not give one hoot about the peoples’ votes, she only cares about one thing and that is getting back in the white house as president and doing ANYTHING, ANYTHING, to get there, and anything short of that she will continue to kick and scream and scratch and snake and continue to divide America as she strongly did in West Virginia and Kentucky especially, campaigning on racial divide. In fact the longer this contest has continued with each new state the racial element got stronger and stronger because the Clintons made it so when they saw that was the only way they could possibly win. And so, she goes to these states and tells the voters everybody’s trying to kick her out of the elections, that all the men are against her the woman, that she is the more electable because she is white, that Barack Obama is not electable because he is black, so she wins the state based on racial divide and all you hear is that she won overwhelmingly. Sure she did, because she played right into the racist bigotry already dormant in those states. She does not deserve to be president. She should have told those people racism has no place in the election, that if they plan to vote against Obama because he is black that she doesn’t want their vote either. But instead she and Bill Clinton did the opposite, feeding the racial frenzy.
The Clintons really need to hang it up. I think they have caused more damage, more division, more ugliness, and if it goes on it will be so bad in terms of really dividing this country along racial lines because that’s the way the Clintons want it — and they’ve gotten their way thus far.

Posted by: RuthieM | May 31, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Constitution has nothing to do with voting in party primaries; in fact, a party can enforce any rules they want – excluding blind, dog owners or men taller than 6″3′ – thes is a party voting – not GE. DNC are morons because allowed to vote anybody in their primaries, which made an impression among less educated voters that this IS a general election…:-))
This is not, and dem party can set any rules they want. Has nothing to do with Bill of Rights…

Posted by: toroid | May 31, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

If the DNC is so firm in their following the rules and “they were warned” stance, then why is there even a hearing today? If it is their true conviction that these states broke the rules and are to be punished, why is the DNC going to change their punishment that was set out at the beginning? It’s all or nothing. They need to stick by what they originally said would happen or they need to throw the whole “playing by the rules” arugment out. No gray in between. See the problem here is the same problem the democrats have had for years – they never elect leaders with a backbone that will stand up and do the right thing, it always comes down to wimpy wishy washy crap. So those that say Clinton agreed to this, they need to remember that Dean said if these states went ahead with their primaries – NO delegates would be seated. He agreed to that punishment.
All or nothing.

Posted by: JH | May 31, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Steve,
Popular vote is most certainly not irrelevant. This system has super delegates. People that vote their conscience and are not beholden to vote for someone that has a delegate lead. I believe the number one factor that should weigh on super delegates minds should be what the majority of the people want (true democracy) That is what makes this process different from the general election! Super delegates can make sure a “true” democracy is realized by making the candidate with the most votes our nominee. I am a Hillary supporter, but have always said that if Barack can win the popular vote (more people want him to be the nominee) then I fully support the super delegates picking him. That is one way this process is better than the electoral college. It has the potential to pick a candidate that the majority of people want. Super delegates let a true democracy reign!

Posted by: michael | May 31, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

The Party big wigs are trying to nominate Obama over the will of the people, which want Hillary.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 31, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

There are 57 caucus/primary elections. 50 States with Texas Two-Step making 51 plus 6 protectorates/ territories equals 57. Use your fingers to count if you have to. Caucuses/primaries are controlled by both Party Committees. The Constitution covers voter rights. Both Parties could remove all elections in the primaries without violating Federal Law and go back to the 1968 etc way of allowing only a few States to vote with the rest having party leaders selecting a candidate. You do not have a primary right. And, what kind of problem are you all having with rules? It was not an issue until Big Tuesday. HRC supporters can peel off. Younger voters with an education and better income, Indies and switch-over GOP supporters can also peel off along with their votes and the money. DNC cannot yet pay for the Convention. HRC cannot bring much to the table because of her debts. Obama still has millions in his campaign because of fiscal prudence. Why should we hand over our contributions to HRC? She spent hers. Keep your sticky fingers out of our money because you do not believe in rules. AS far as I am concerned, the GOP can have Florida because you lot have messed up twice now in 8 years! You have had since August 2007 to protest but did not. Sounds a lot like HRC supporters want only part of Florida to count and not at all interested in protesting on behalf of any other voters. Does not take a rocket scientiest to figure that one out.

Posted by: KiwiTricia | May 31, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Dem38,
Maybe I didn’t make myself clear, I’ll try again THIS IS THE SELECTION PROCESS THE PARTY USES TO SELECT A CANDIDATE, NOT A GENERAL ELECTION.
they do not have to follow the rules of a general election. If the party wants to they can select their candidate based on caucuses, elections, a roll of the dice, or the color of underwear the candidate prefers.
IT IS A SELECTION PROCESS CHOSEN BY THE PARTY TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN CANDIDATE, NOT A GENERAL ELECTION.

Posted by: SteveS | May 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

The voter’s that want Hillary should register Independant, vote for John McCain or not vote at all and then will not have superdelegates overturning thier votes.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 31, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Wexler is doing a GREAT job.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Dem38,
Thank you. Alice Travis is making very good arguments. Very good arguments.
Obama ’08

Posted by: learn to read | May 31, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

The Clinton reps have already spoken.
Also Sen.Clinton remarks of Kennedy were not misrepresented. She said what she said and knew exactly what she was saying.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Rev Pfleger and Rev Wright could address the big wigs of the Rules & Bylaws Committee. Both are Obama supporters and have been key in his life guidance.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 31, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Michael- How is it that only the delegates that were not elected by anyone are the most “democratic”.
You start off by saying the popular vote should count, and I agree, maybe it should, but if that is the case, how does your train of thought jump that track and go on to praise the virtue of only the delegates that have not won ANY votes.
And by the way, it is not a question as to whether it should be determined by popular vote or delegate count. The rules say the candidate will be chosen by the delgate count, and all involved knew that going in. You either follow the rules you agreed to in the first place, or you don’t.

Posted by: SteveS | May 31, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Bill & Hillary Clinton had thier time in the white house. McCain will be another Bush. We need a new perspective and Obama is that new perspective. Florida & Michigan should not be counted as they broke the party rules.To say that what the people what is Hillary is not true. I am a female and I don’t want Hillary to be the nominee. The Clinton’s are famous for thier back stabbing and unethical behavior. Do you all really want some the Clintons again in the white house?

Posted by: jrivera | May 31, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

It is the same and I’m glad Obama has distanced himself from both.
But there is one fundematal difference, Obama did not say these comment.
You can bring bitter-gate up but Obama has given a proper interpretation.
What’s Clinton excuse for her Kennedy comments or her Bosnia comments? She has none.

Posted by: Vanessa | May 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Why a vote for Obama may lead to more war and deaths, not less. The facts on the ground now in Iraq is that the surge has been successful and the US is winning the war in Iraq. That is why Obama’s plan of pulling defeat out of the jaws of victory in Iraq is so idiotic. Al Qaeda is on the run in Iraq but if the USA retreats and turns Iraq over to them, Al Qaeda will have access to Iraq’s large oil reserves and thus the means and opportunity to attack us and attack us hard. Our Middle Eastern allies will have no reason to trust our word and abandon us. Not to mention the boost a withdrawal from Iraq will give to Iran, Syria and Hamas. Think WWIII, If Obama is elected his defeatist policies will put us all at more risk of another 9/11 attack and even worse the blow up the middle east which will mean more will die, just like what happened in WWII when people thought Hitler could be appeased and were wrong, very wrong. Whats more, the killing fields of cambodia could be played out again in Iraq by Al Qaeda, Only this time the people murdered could be the very people that risked their lives to support the US. Question, if Obama wins,can you sleep well at night if you get what you want and this happens? I hope not.
P.S. If Obama had got his way and Saddam was still in power the West would be dealing with TWO major middle eastern powers on the brink or already in possession of nuclear weapons thumbing their nose at the US.

Posted by: Mary | May 31, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

The DNC look like idiots for backing Obama – but, they are hell bent on destruction.
I do believe this is much more complicated than the American people have been led to believe. I believe there is a conspiracy and movement to the far left, and it just so happens that Dean, Pelosi, and Reid have those same beliefs – they are in positions of power – and they see this as their time with a candidate is the most far left this country has ever seen. He has ties that would scare anyone; yet, he continues on his merry way to be the nominee.
America you are not well informed!!!!!!!!!!! Obama will change the face of America forever into a socialistic/marxist country. And, the vast majority of the dems are in full agreement with his radical ideas – including his and his associates anti-white sentiments. We are going to see payback for (as they perceive) it 100 years of wrong to the blacks.
I do not have any prejudice – my best friend is AA; however, I now know that there is serious anger/hate and I believe there will be revenge.
I am deeply concerned for our country. I didn’t want to see another Repub in office, but I feel we have no choice but to vote for McCain in 08. fyi – I believe there is more coming on Mr. Obama.

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Roxanne-
Very Perceptive-politically, AND regarding the attributes of your fellow posters. Might I repectfully suggest “never wrestle with a pig. All it does is gets you dirty, and it turns out the pig likes it!”

Posted by: SteveS | May 31, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

“disgusted in Illinois” – racist much?

Posted by: jrivera | May 31, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Superdelegate system is just one more indication of the corrupt Democratic party system.
CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION, CORRUPTION
We need to get rid of corruption, and now we are witnessing this debacle spotlight just how corrupt our system is.
Obama is corrupt and so is the Democratic Party.

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

If you want the end of America, Vote Obama

Posted by: Sam | May 31, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

jrivera what are you suggesting?

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

jrivera, I say to you why are you supporting Obama who surrounds himself with racist, anti-American anti-semites including, Rev. Wright, Ayers, Father Pfleger, Odinga (the corrupt marxist Kenyan leader) to name a few.

Posted by: Sara | May 31, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

So where was Harold Ickes during the Florida 2000 vote counting debacle? Seems that he’s trying to make up for that failure by giving the Democratic Party the disrespect that he and others failed to give the Republican Party in 2000.

Posted by: Fmr Rep in NE | May 31, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Leadership:
I saw the pictures of the protests in DC. Don’t be swayed by the “200 White Post-Menopausel(?) March!” Geez, I bet there are more reporters there covering this than concerned Hillary supporters. Maybe this fear of lost Hillary votes is a lot of smoke?

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | May 31, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Mark, it is kind of sad to see the desperate Obamamorons holding on to a lying gaffe machine like Obama.

Posted by: Hennessy | May 31, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Mr. Coffee – latte I assume is your preference?
You are dead wrong – there are millions of us white post menopause voters out here.
You really fit the Obama supporter profile – insulting and degrading women.
I take offense to your degradation of women. What is your real issue with post menopausal women???????????

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

The Hillary supporters would be in love with the DNC and Super Delegates and be fighting for the DNC to stick to its punishment and rules if the situation was reversed. So quit acting if your just standing up for whats right.

Posted by: CW | May 31, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Obama has made so many lies and gaffes he belongs in an old folks home.

Posted by: Terry | May 31, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Government is not the benevolent force that delusional Obamaites believe it is. Quite the contrary, government uses the force of law to seize money and property from the workers and uses it to feather the beds of a bunch of self serving bureaucrats and politicians. Little if anything is trickled back down to the people. In fact what’s left over, if anything, typically goes to a bunch of corrupt hanger ons and sycophants like Rezco. Obama’s Marxist friends and associates hate the free market and want to replace it with the all powerful force of the State. Problem is the track record of Marxist style run governments are not so good. Just look at the loss of freedom and millions of lives that were lost in an effort to create a “Utopian State” in the Soviet Union, Cuba, China and North Korea. The dead hand of a Marxist style government (that Obama’s friends believe in) is anything but benevolent. I ask you to listen closely to Obama and if you do, you will hear the echo of his friends Marxist beliefs in Obama’s flowery speeches. Don’t buy into it.

Posted by: Listen | May 31, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Any man that degrades women as you have here today, and the Obama campaign and his associates have will deserve what they get in November.
Racism is nothing compared to the horrible prejudice against women that the obama campaign and supporters have shown.
Keep up the good work on this site – let the truth behind your gender prejudice continue – more ammo for the fall.

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Watch out!! If the DNC doesnt give self serving Clinton everything she wants its going to be like sticking a stick into the Hillary bee’s nest. Some of her supporters will be running in to walls, jumping in front of cars, yelling and screaming that Obama ripped them off. The the DNC is no good and delegates shouldnt count. Oh and they are going to all vote for McCain. Thankfully these are the supporters already doing that and most her supporters care more for the Dem Party
act like adults and will support the Dem party no matter who wins to make sure we do not continue with another 4 years of Bush.

Posted by: CW | May 31, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

ObamaGoddess you have spoken to how many Hillary supporters? Millions I assume – OMG

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

If Clinton does get into office, be prepared for the kind of garbage she will allow for.
She will pack the Cabinet with femminists. She will support only women’s issues.
She will pack the Supreme Court with pro-abortion Judges.
Women’s issues will be her sole concern.
She will support gays/lesbians
She will support same sex marriage.
She will also probably be the most hated president ever elected.

Posted by: Hirotomi Takemitsu | May 31, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

So who are you – someone big and powerful to speak to millions of voters.
Just like Obama 57 states, Auchwitz, Uncle in the Army
Are we making things up Goddess – just like you idol Obama??????????

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 31, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

If Hillary intimidates the DNC to seat the delegates who knowingly broke the rules, the Obama dems need to take the party completely apart. Then in response need to ensure that the new dem party has nothing to do with the old and never even give them the time of day. Call for a 100 year punishment/boycott of the old dems and set forth a path of retribution that the country has never seen the likes of. Enough is enough.

Posted by: Robert Plant | May 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

4 years of Bush compared to a possible 4 years of Obama.
Bush: Lowered Taxes
Obama: Will raise taxes.
Bush: No attacks on American soil since 9/11
Obama: Obama’s weak foreign policy tactics of talking to enemy leaders without precondition will make the US look weak and more vulnerable to another 9/11 attack. If you don’t believe me Obama’s own example of the Kennedy/Kruscheff 1961 talks illustrates what happens when a US leader talks without preconditions with an enemy leader as Obama says he will do. Kennedy admitted that he was unprepared and made the US look weak Two months later the Berlin wall was erected and stood for 28 years.
Bush: The increased the strength of the military has Al Qaeda on the run per the latest CIA report.
Obama: During a time of war, will disarm the US and downsize the military thus making the US more vulnerable to attack.

Posted by: Timothy | May 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Now matter how you work it, Obama has won the nomination hands down. If the nomination goes to Hillary, then its like the dems telling Obama, “What you thinking <n-word). You ain't gonna be the president. Now go and sit down in the BACK of the bus."

Posted by: Robert Plant | May 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

BOTTOM LINE is that Clinton and her supporters are just mad that Obama beat her at HER own game. They never in a million years thought that Obama would be any real compitition.
He’s not only compitition, but may get the nomination. This has Clinton supporters HOT !!
Ya’ll can try to clean it up ALL YOU WANT TO…….all this crap about sexism is weak and sad !!!!
She got BEAT….PERIOD !!!!!!

Posted by: Order | May 31, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

SDs …end this madness….vote HRC as DEMS’s Presidential Candidate and BHO as VP !!!

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

It is true that people spew hate when they talk about Hillary but this is something that was sold to the people via the media. It is the same media that sold us GWB and are selling us Obama. Hillary has trounced Obama in knowledge and in her understanding of policy and yet the media wants to shove the inexperienced Obama down our throats even though there is a smart and experienced candidate on the ballot. It is extremely disappointing to see how inexperience wins over experience and it is this that turns people away from politics. The media sold us GWB over the experienced Al Gore, they sold us the Iraq War and now they have almost sold us Obama. The people never seem to learn and I hope they learn sometime in the future soon or we are going to be another 3rd world country.

Posted by: voter | May 31, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Now matter how you work it, Obama has won the nomination hands down. If the nomination goes to Hillary, then its like the dems telling Obama, “What you thinking n@#$%, you ain’t gonna be president. Now go sit in the BACK of the bus and vote like we tell you too.”

Posted by: Robert Plant | May 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

I could not see GWB on tv after the mess he has brought about. Now GWB seems so experienced and wonderful compared to what is waiting in the wings for America!

Posted by: Voter | May 31, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

BHO’s Goddess ….you must be Republican posing as a DEM….even blog name gave you away

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Voter. You have to be kidding. The Clintons are media darlings. Even when Obama’s wins, its still about Hillary. The media is beside themselves that they cannot override the voters and give the nominee to Hillary. The media has always been against GWB and loved Gore. Gore lost because smart people saw through him. Its also obvious you have never been to a third world country because you have no idea what you are talking about.

Posted by: Robert Plant | May 31, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Dream ticket for DEMS : HRC / BHO

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

IF BHO is really leading and winning hands down, DEMs wont be in this mess

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Anyone who would even think that the media is not selling us anything is living in the clouds. It has been obvious that the media has been selling us stuff since 2000. How else could we have been hoodwinked into supporting a war that is such a big disaster. I hope people have not forgotten that there was 80% support for the Iraq war. Now, milllions are buying another bad product and as a consequence, we have another huge disaster around the corner and that goes by the name OBAMA.

Posted by: Voter | May 31, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

If BHO is really winning it ….Dean would not be looking so glum on CNN today chairing the DNC meeting

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Again people have their heads buried in the sand! Do we hear of stolen pipes and drain covers? We hear a lot of stories like this in Ohio. These incidents didn’t happen in America but plenty in the third world countries. They are happening in America now! The naive GWB brought this upon us. Now we have the naive Obama. Support Obama but be prepared for the worst!

Posted by: voter | May 31, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

The DNC is split, the voters are split…even the SDs are split…what a primary season !!!
I stil prefer the good ole Knock Outs

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

It was the dems who sold the war in Iraq. It was the dems who said over and over and over again that there were weapons of mass destruction. (just google it) The plan democrats voted for showed 9000+ dead taking Baghdad. They pushed for not just outing Saddam, but maintaining a permanent military presence for the next 50 or so years like Japan/Korea. How easily you all pretend to forget.

Posted by: Robert Plant | May 31, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Timothy, In addition, 4 years of Obama will bring as high as $8.00 a gallon at the gas tank as Obama refuses to drill for more oil or build new refineries as Bush is proposing. Obama will drive industry out of the US and thus cause much higher unemployment.

Posted by: tom | May 31, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

voter,
it was not the media that steered us towards obama. the media did everything they could to tear obama down and feed into hillary’s divisive talking points. obama has really won this thing against all odds.
obama ’08

Posted by: media backfired | May 31, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

A BHO voter is someone who reads “Audacity of Hope”. An anti-BHO voter is someone who understands BHO”
- paraphrasing Ronald Reagan -

Posted by: csquan | May 31, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

The Clintons are very “unpopular” in this country. Bill didn’t earn the moniker “worst president ever” for nothing. I know, some of you right now are like, “WHAAAAT? Thats what we call GWB!!” No, sorry, thats what we disgruntled dems came up with after his disastrous presidency. Trying to make GWB look bad so you can make Bill look good just isn’t working. If we had been stronger and stood by Lieberman and impeached Bill clean out of office, Gore would have become president. Say that to yourself again, “Gore would have become president”. Now say it again and again till it sinks in.

Posted by: Robert Plant | May 31, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

My father is from Iran, I have been there several times. I am a citizen there (whatever that means anymore) and I thought that the reason I live in this country and love it so dearly is because there ARE RULES that allow the honest to prevail and the dishonest to perish. There is structure, regulation and you can feel confident that such rules were set in place for a reason. The fact that this “issue” even exists in our western world is ludicrous. I am absolutely baffled by this. How can she criticize the “Bush Empire” when the Clinton’s use their contacts and lobbyists just as much, except hidden behind a donkey rather than an elephant? My vote doesn’t matter in Iran and the unjustifiable, random inter workings of the central government there almost seems to loosely compare to this fest of absolute embarrassment for any democracy….So sad that the common person like myself living in this country can’t see past this & feel the betrayal lurking around the corner. Hillary is setting the path smooth for John McCain and putting her name above the moral and success of the party. I’m ashamed to be a democrat right now- We look like fools.

Posted by: Natalie | May 31, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Dumb dems have just run the party into the ground. The plan by us smart dems for the “new democrat” party was new ideas. Our ideas and plan of action is what was going to make us the winner without having to make the republicans look like the loser. The smart dem plan made the republicans irrelevant, but you dumb dems ruined with your childish immature behavior. The dems are not going to be winners again until we find a way to get rid of about 50% of the party which consists of the dumb dems. Now, even when we win, we lose. Because our candidates promises were lies and we never get what we want. Just look our our disastrous Congress led by Pelosi. We voted you in to end the war PERIOD and for no other reason.

Posted by: Robert Plant | May 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

It’s not math.. a long time ago it stopped being about math. It’s the map, it’s the message, it’s the tone, it’s character: It’s all about the superdelegates!
I for one see no reason why they should reward Obama for running the most negative campaign in years. What comes from father Pfleger, came from the Obama-campaign from day one. There’s nothing left of the Obama pillars:
* change (Obama is Old-liberal Dems all the way),
* bridging the divide (with his disrespect, give me a break)
* hope (Obama breaks the mole on divisive)
Clinton beats Obama on Character!

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Seating of Florida & Michigan and the allocation of delegate SHOULD NOT impact the outcome of the Primaries!
The United States stop being a monarchy a long time ago, over two centuries ago.
This means that no candidate should be awarded an election ‘victory’ without any campaigning on the ground, but based SOLELY on the prior POPULARITY OF HER HUSBAND!
If Democrats of Florida & Michigan are unhappy with the Republican leaders in their State’s agenda, then Dems of Florida and Michigan should cease the whining to the DNC and America; go back to the citizens of Florida & Michigan this November; and WIN BACK THE STATES’ GOVERNMENT!
It is obviously that the Dems of Fl & Mi were played by their GOP counterparts.
Notice that the GOP of Fl & Mi settled their Primaries amicably? There is a reason for that.
The witty GOP of Fl & Mi move up the Primaries and settled with their National Party in the hope that the Dems will be in dissension. lol

Posted by: Patriot | May 31, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

I am a Floridian and I disagreed with the decision to move the primary to January 29th. In protest, I did not vote in the primary. Everyone is talking about seating the Florida delegates to represent the primary election results, what about the people who did not vote in the primary because we were told the primary didn’t count. Now our votes don’t really count at all because people who did vote will now represent everyone. This whole issue of deciding to seat the delegates now is a very self-centered, egotistical tactic by the Clintons to steal the nomination.
I am ashamed to be associated with the same gender as Hillary Clinton and it absolutely amazes me that women across this country cannot see how grandiose she is. She hasn’t dropped out of the race because she still can’t believe that the majority of Americans, as represented by our delegates, do not want her in the White House. She’s holding on in case something happens like with “Robert Kennedy in June 1968.” How can intelligent, independent, assertive women of the 21st Century fall for the crap that this woman spews out at us.
I will be very upset if each delegate in Florida is allowed a full vote, especially given the fact that they will not be representing me or the other voters who decided not to participate in this primary.

Posted by: Tavavilla | May 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

I have lots of hope. I hoped for rain although I love sunshine. I am so glad it rained. The DNC couldn’t have picked a better day for Hillary Clinton supporters (all 10 of them) to be protesting outside.
Obama ’08!

Posted by: hope for change | May 31, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Question for Clinton fans.
Why is it you insist the voters of Florida shouldn’t be punished because of the actions of the Florida Party in bringing forward the Primary – but you think the potential Obama voters in Michigan should be punished because of the decision of Barack to take his name off the ballot?
I don’t care which way this goes as long as it is fair. Either the voters should not be punished and that means a way should be found to count those who wanted to vote for Obama in Michigan (even if you have to repoll the whole state), or the Democratic Party rules should be upheld and the decisions made before the contents should be upheld.
It is fundamentally wrong to argue that every vote should count – and at the same time argue that every Obama in supporter in Michigan should be disenfranchised. Counting every vote means not just counting those who had the chance to vote for their nominee – but also finding a solution that shows the DNC cares about the hundreds of thousands of people who never had the chance to vote for the person they wanted to.
And before a Hillary-ite says that it was Obama’s choice to take his name off the ballot – shame on you. Isn’t your whole argument that voters should not be punished for the decisions made by politicians. If you truly believe that – act like you do. That is of course if you truly believe in fair play rather than whatever helps your nominee win.
Jenny

Posted by: Jenny2005 | May 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Obama’s call for change harkens back to the days of an old style Feudal society. A society where the aristocratic self serving elites in power lorded it over a bunch of dependent near starving serfs. Serfs who owned nothing and were forced to do the bidding of their masters or face their wrath. If you think this is far fetched, think again. Obama’s most radical connections are his alliance with “Acorn” whose radical agenda includes a shift towards a blatant form of authoritarian style socialism. For example, Acorn is pushing cities into forcing business into paying a “living wage” to their employees Acorn is doing this knowing full well this will drive business out the cities and thus cause high unemployment. To avoid this, Acorn is trying to force companies into obtaining “exit visas before allowing them to leave the city. Acorn’s next move could very well include requiring exit visas for wealthy or middle-class individuals before they are allowed to leave a city. If Obama is elected the road to serfdom may be sooner than you think and it may not be the kind of “change we can believe in” that you think it will be.

Posted by: Nathan | May 31, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

I’m sure the superdelegates will come out next week and if Obama has more supers then Hillary will bow out. I can’t see it going to the convention.

Posted by: erin | May 31, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Nathan, if Acorn and Obama prevails and forces businesses to do their bidding won’t the businesses just close down leaving all the employees without jobs? I mean even Obama can’t force people to work for nothing can he? Oh I forgot, Obama is for higher taxes so just about everyone will be forced to work for practically nothing. Except everyone will be forced to pay the salaries of all those government elites in power. Than Obama can direct the government workers to implement his vision of change by dictating to everyone what to do like what type of cars to drive, how much and what food you can eat and what temprerature to set your thermastat at. “Change we all can believe in”

Posted by: Erinc | May 31, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

roxanne, typical leftist, instead of addressing the issues you name call. Why don’t you do a little research on the agenda of Acorn and Obama’s ties to them. If you do you will find that Acorn is a radical left wing group that believes in a very authoritarian style of socialism which Obama seems pretty in tune with. The definition of serfdom is “A state of subjugation to a master”. In an authoritarian form of socialism that Acorn advocates the “master” is the State. Thus Obama’s allegiance to Acorn is very troubling given his speeches, although full of a lot of pretty words, seem to be very much in line with Acorn’s core beliefs. After all, Obama believes that the power of the State is the answer to all the peoples problems, not the free market. So how can that come about without the boot of the State coming down to crush all of our necks in the name of the collective “good” Obama is calling for? You tell me.

Posted by: Nathan | May 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

roxanne, well said. I am 100% behind you!

Posted by: Naomi | May 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Obama knew the rules not to run ads-radio-newspapers anything.Obama did.broke those rules
Hillary did not!
Obama took his name off the ballot and he all along said to the public I wasn’t on the ballot.Liar.We ahve been telling people that he was and he took his name off the ballot.MSNBC-Obama wasn’t on the ballot.Liars He was.
Obama-Richarson-John Ewards went uncommitted after they took their names off the ballot and there they broke the rules because it was not aproved for them to do so.
It was the repubs who moved the date up.It was on tv that told the people to go vote.Not Hillary
Hillary did nothing wrong get that in your closed minded minds.
Obamas judements-words-lies anfter lies.and more he is a a-want-a-be for his own agenda.But the repubs will get it again cause today we are not going to be sweet talk in as they are trying to do something when the rules they know who broke them and still with their planned agenda. Hillary supporters will take no less then the truth.
I will never vote or fall in line with Obama or our DNC-Dean Howard PEPSI OLS LADY DID THIS.I won’t be in a democratic party who lies-cheats!

Posted by: Danny | May 31, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Did Hillary ever explain why she vote yes to the primary election rule and later want to change it when she come out a loser? Such character does not fit to be a president of the United State.

Posted by: mampang | May 31, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

roxanne, Once again you name call and do not address the issues. Is it because you cannot avoid the fact that Obama and Acorn are very much in alliance when it comes to Obama’s belief in an authoritarian form of socialism as the vehicle to implement Obama’s vision of change. If you want the State as your “Master” with the force of law dictating what you can drive, what and how much you can eat and what temprerature to set your thermostat at, I say vote Obama cause that is what you will get, Obama has said so.

Posted by: Nathan | May 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Right on Nathan! You really nailed it when it comes unmasking Obama’s true beliefs. That’s why Roxanne and her ilk can only name call cause they know you tell the truth about Obama and Obama supporters can’t handle the truth.

Posted by: Sara | May 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Obama should really watch his back when offering any compromise to Clinton. She is very sneaky and probably has some ace in the hole. I wouldn’t trust her if I were him.
Obama 08

Posted by: watch out | May 31, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

It was not Hillary who broke any rules.
It was Obama.The only agreement was not to campaign in Florida-Michigan.Obama did.He ranned ads-radio-press in FL Mi
He then took his name of the ballot and was his choice to do so.Went uncommitted without permission to do so as well as Richarson-John EdWards.
Hillary did not run no ads-press-radio-or anything in those states.she stood with those rules.
It was the repubs who moved the date up.
Obama is so far up Bush tail.Obama MSNBC-MBC-TODAY SHOW ALL ALL PRO-OBAMA BUDDIES SAID OBAMA WAS NOT ON THE MICHIGAN BALLOT.YES EVERYONE HEARD THAT COME FROM OBAMA AND HIS PRO-MEDIA.SO WHAT DID YOU HEAR TODAY SO FAR IN THIS DNC CONVENTION?HUH? HE WAS ON THE MICHIGAN BALLOT. AND TO SAY OBAMA SAID UN,UM I WASN’T ON MICHIGAN BALLOT.LIAR!THAT WAS PROVED TODAY.AND HE DID RUN HIS ADS AS WELL AS JOHN EDWARD RICHARSON THEY BROKE THE RULES OF THE DNC AND THEY WERE NOT TO CAMPAIGN IN FLORIDA-MICHIGAN AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED NOT TO BY OBAMA -HILLARY AND THE REST. HILLARY DID NOT CAMPAIGN IN FLORIDA-MICHIGAN.
NOW WHOS THE LIAR!OBAMA AS HE ALWAYS IS A LIAR!TAKE A LOOK BACK AT ALL HIS LIES ON VIDEO-MEDIA HIS JUDGEMENTS.
WE HILLARY’S SUPPORTERS WILL NOT FALL IN LINE WITH OUR DNC LEADERS OR OBAMA NEVER!

Posted by: Mindy | May 31, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Clinton sounds like she owns DNC. What a stupid and childish manner. I am a woman of her age but I am so proud that I do not support her. In January she said herself that the votes in Michigan do not matter. After 60 years of her life has she not learned not to break rules?

Posted by: Jen | May 31, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I believe that all votes in a democracy should count. But all of those votes should be well informed votes. People voting without any campaigning is like arranged marriage, where the bride not the groom knows anything about each other without knowing anything about each other. I also believe that HRC is can go to any lengths and cheat to get what she wants. Here are some points:
1) Being the first lady does not mean you have experience. Hillary was never ever in the decision making process as the first Lady of Arkansas or as the First Lady of USA. This is wishful and misleading. Shame on her.
2) Under sniper fire in Bosnia. Goodness Gracious. A thing like that can never be a faux pas. Your can never forget an incident like if it ever happened to you. She needs to see a doctor than be the president.
3) HRC was always in favor of NAFTA. Now she has the audacity of saying that she was against it!! Such a lier.
4) Changing the rules in order to suit you!! Wow, what a president she would make, right! She has repeatedly changed all her statements with time to time.
7) She voted FOR the war in IRAQ. Where was all her so called experience back then.
6) And last but not the least, what Wright is to OB, Bill is to Hillary. And I guess the later one is the more dangerous combo!!
There are many more points. Well, HRC supporters don’t support her based on reasons or facts but on rhetorics. Clinton knows that people have very short memories and she can manipulate them the way she wants.

Posted by: Dave | May 31, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Hi Dave, WOW you are genius !
“People voting without any campaigning is like arranged marriage, where the bride not the groom knows anything about each other without knowing anything about each other.”
Exactly so!

Posted by: Jen | May 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

DAVE – WELL SAID!
There’s probably not enough blog space to fill up all of their lies and flip flops! I’m so glad you pointed out that her experience is limited to first lady. This does not qualify you for President. If it did, Laura Bush would be running! Occasionally sleeping with your husband does not qualify you for his job!

Posted by: roxanne | May 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

This whole situation is like a football game in which one team is ahead by 14 points with two minutes to go. Suddenly, the losing team declares that the pre-game ‘warm-up’ touchdowns it scored should be counted, before the other team even showed up. Hillary, you can’t change the rules late in the 4th quarter, or at any other time, for that matter!

Posted by: Charlie | May 31, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

WOW! SENATOR OBAMA HAS RESIGNED FROM TRINITY CHURCH!

Posted by: roxanne | May 31, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

After watching the Rules & Bylaw Committee for a bit today, I am just disgusted by how unprofessional this meeting has been. What is pretty a cut-and-dry case of rules being broken on both the party of Michigan and Florida has turned into this long, drawn-out, long-winded blah-blah-blah fest. Honestly, what is the big deal? The rules were that states had an allowable window of dates. FL and MI rolled the dice and lost. One of the guys on the committee actually said today, “Can anyone point to more than just one rule that was broken by Michigan?” All on the panel stayed silent. And the committee member acted as if he’d proven that MI shouldn’t lose their votes. MI and FL frickin’ broke the rules. What a bunch of bags of wind? They didn’t even spoken to the legal issues involved nor any factual issues. My respect for the Democratic Party “leaders” has been totally disintegrated by today’s debacle.

Posted by: J. T. Bigglesworth | May 31, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Harold Ickies just said that Clinton has stated that she will take this to the convention. THE SUPERS WILL COME OUT ON WEDNESDAY AND CLOSE OUT THIS HARPY! THE ELECTION WILL BE COMPLETED. THE END!

Posted by: roxanne | May 31, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

ICKIES JUST GOT SMACKED DOWN!
YES

Posted by: roxanne | May 31, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Hillary is lying and cheating her way to the nomination just like Bush did for the white House. She’ll stop at NOTHING!

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

disgusted in Illinois – Give Sen. Obama a chance! A vote for McCain is another vote for Bush. Eight years of disaster wasn’t enough? Duh? We know Bush has destroyed this country and so will McCain. We don’t know what Obama will do, but whatever it is, it can’t be WORSE than what Bush/McCain has/will done/do.

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

That’s pretty much it. FL is accepted as is, with each delegate getting one half vote each. MI is accepted 69-59, with each delegate getting one half vote each. It’s over for the lady in the pantsuit. Barack Obama is going to be the nominee of the Democratic Party. It should become official on Tuesday once all the supers commit. Good night, HRC, sleep well.

Posted by: J. T. Bigglesworth | May 31, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Yessssssssssssss! 1/2 vote each state. neither florida nor michican changes the outcome and the voters are respected.
Obama ’08!
YES WE CAN!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: hope for change | May 31, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

hope for change: Yes we WILL!!!!!!!
Obama 2008 & 2012

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

STOP!
Stop arguing.
President Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Nuff said!

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

STOP!
Stop arguing.
President Obama in 2008 and 2012.
Nuff said!
(No one wants a witch for prez.)

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

J. T. Bigglesworth:
PRECISELY!

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

It’s a done deal…
Obama 2008 & 2012

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

DING DONG THE WITCH IS DEAD! IF CLINTON SUPPORTERS DON’T VOTE FOR OBAMA SO BE IT! I’D RATHER SEE OBAMA IS THE NOMINEE AND POSSIBLY LOSE THAN HAVING THAT HAGG BE THE NOMINEE! I’M SORRY BUT THAT’S HOW I FEEL! CHUCK TODD IS RIGHT! THE CLINTONS NO LONGER CONTROL THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY! IT’S OBAMA’S PARTY NOW! IF THAT HAGG TRYS ANYTHING AT THE CONVENTION HER MIKE WILL BE KILLED AND SHE’LL LIKELY BE DRAGGED OFF THE STAGE. KINDA LIKE NOW! I CAN’T WAIT FOR TUESDAY!

Posted by: roxanne | May 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Let’s move on.
It’s time for UNITY.

Posted by: Florida & Michigan | May 31, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

WHAT THE CREDENTIALS COMMITEE SHOULD DO IS TELL THE CLINTON CAMPAGIN THAT THEY WILL HEAR THEIR ARGUMENTS ON MONDAY!
CONVENTION MY ASS!

Posted by: roxanne | May 31, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

We saulute you, Mr. President, OBAMA.

Posted by: Florida & Michigan | May 31, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

I can’t wait to see Clintons disappear from media …!

Posted by: Jen | May 31, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

J. T. Bigglesworth, I’m with you! This debacle should have never even taken place…PERIOD!
What a waste of time and energy since it changes nothing. Obama will win the nominee, even after Hillary reneged on the rules she agreed to. “I voted for the rules before I voted against them,” she can honestly say. She is a sore loser, and the fact that she called for this farce to commence speaks volumes of her deceptive, conniving strategy to steal the nomination from Sen. Obama. If she REALLY cared about MI and FL voters, she wouldn’t have agreed to the rules of the game. Now she’s reneging since the numbers aren’t in her favor. Yeah, she can be trusted in the WH.
What about those in MI and FL who DIDN’T bother voting? Does she care about the fact that THEIR votes WON’T count either? NO! And for obvious reasons…
Vote Obama! A true, honest, upstanding American. A change we can COUNT on, and desperately NEED in Washington!
Obama 2008 & 2012

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Posted by: Bridget | May 31, 2008 5:06:54 AM
POSTED:
COUNT ALL VOTES!!!
It’s the democracy, stupid!!!
If not Sen. Obama isn’t the legitim nominee.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tell to HILLARY! She’s the one who agreed NOT to count the votes; that is, until she saw she was LOSING!! She’s a HYPOCRITE, stupid!

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Hillary “claims” she will agree to whatever the outcome of today’s meeting is.
NOT!!!!!!!
Obama 2008 & 2012

Posted by: lllllllllllllll | May 31, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Why does the American media insist on the Democratic primary race going to Obama and going to him RIGHT NOW? Is it because they continue to work for Bush/Rove and these pipsqueaks want the easiest path possible for McCain–”Obama.”
How easy do the Republicans want it? An African American Democratic candidate in a predominantly white country. An ex-cocaine user. A man with TWO ministers from “politically incorrect hell.”
That’s what the “real campaign” in the fall will be about once Obama is nominated; Cocaine, Ministers who stand on their tongues and “how in the world do the Democrats get the Latino vote back?”
On that chilly November night when Obama goes the way of other, politically speaking, unqualified candidates like McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis, all Democrats will wish we had “seen this Bush/Rove conspiracy coming.”

Posted by: Larry Gomes | May 31, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Why does the American media insist on the Democratic primary race going to Obama and going to him RIGHT NOW? Is it because they continue to work for Bush/Rove and these pipsqueaks want the easiest path possible for McCain–”Obama.”
How easy do the Republicans want it? An African American Democratic candidate in a predominantly white country. An ex-cocaine user. A man with TWO ministers from “politically incorrect hell.”
That’s what the “real campaign” in the fall will be about once Obama is nominated; Cocaine, Ministers who stand on their tongues and “how in the world do the Democrats get the Latino vote back?”
On that chilly November night when Obama goes the way of other, politically speaking, unqualified candidates like McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis, all Democrats will wish we had “seen this Bush/Rove conspiracy coming.”

Posted by: Larry Gomes | June 1, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I still think we should bring back George McGovern and let him have one more go in the fall . Dump Obama and Hilary .

Posted by: Maon Dixon | June 1, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am

I do not intend to vote for a man who is so boring, over zealous, uses “two ton” words. I have seen from the start that he is a fake. a Judas, who would sell his soul to be president. When in reality he has neither the drive or qualifications to be a president. He is no Kennedy or even a LJB and definitely no Roosevelt. He has alienated and defamed so many groups. To say that we are representative of the company we keep is absurd, that would be like saying Ernst Janning or Leni Reifenstahl , or even Stalin’s aids and successors are not as responsible as him. If you really think people do not care that he was mixed up for YEARS with a radicalist, anti seminist, anti formalist and so on is simply ignorant. The point is if we hang with those people we reflect what we are to others. Whether we think so or not. Now have a pretty opened mind, but I am also Greek Orthodox, and anyone, I mean anyone, black, white, green or whatever,who curses and shouts profanity when supposedly being holy and mindful is not one to garner my respect. And as far as saying he is the winner of the DNC does not matter one iota. There are too many Americans who would never have him elected. This is all fodder for the RNC. If, I say if, because this is far from over, if Obama wins the nomination, he will not have a prayer. I do not care how many “young hip voters” turn out. It won’t happen it will be McGovern and et al all over again. Not a chance, people will vote McCain in, who is much more presidential. If people think they have found a savior in Obama, they are dead. If Hilary does not win people are not going to say “oh, well…I will vote for Obama.” Not gonna have a snowball’s chance in hell. Face it, he is a good senator, maybe even a great senator, he does not look, act, or talk presidential. I have kept silent till now and do not like taking sides being a independent, but one must say something eventually, if Obama wins it will be the beginning of the fall of this wonderful empire(and we are an empire, no matter what we are told in any amount of inane political rhetoric).
By the way, I am a 24 year old philosopher.
If I offend anyone personally or have attack anyone bodily by this post I do apologize, but I had to say something .

Posted by: Robert Buehner | June 5, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.