Hillary Clinton’s Electoral Map Argument
ABC News’ Eloise Harper reports: Hillary Clinton was back in Louisville, Ky., Friday night delivering her stump speech. She rolled through her lines at the Democratic Party dinner in this state where she is up in the polls, as many in the audience cheered while holding “Hillary” signs.
Sen. Clinton re-introduced her electoral map argument, which she raised yesterday in West Virginia, where she said “delegate math may be complicated, but the electoral math is easy.” Clinton on Friday night sought to make the same argument that she can win the election in November despite Sen. Barack Obama’s lead in delegates.
Clinton said, “The only way we can have a Democrat in that White House come next January is to win in November, and we cannot win unless we can win 270 electoral votes. Look at the map and figure out where we are going to get those votes and which candidate is more likely to be able to win those votes in November.”
Clinton even offered a jab toward her opponent during the dinner saying, “We have had enough of speeches. Enough promises. That’s not going to solve our problems. What we need is action.”
The senator was introduced by superdelegate and DNC committee member Terry McBrayer, who ribbed Sen. Obama for not spending time in Kentucky.
“We have been looking for Obama in Kentucky,” he said. “I personally contacted with Dean’s Milk Company, and we are putting Obama’s picture on a carton of milk to see if we can find him in Kentucky.”
The crowd booed, to which McBrayer responded, “Bring it on.”
Clinton saw the opportunity later in her speech to remind guests that she made the effort to be at the dinner. “I am the only candidate here tonight in Kentucky with all of you,” Clinton said to a loud cheer.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
No matter how hard she tries, no superdelegates are going to be so foolish as to completely ignore the primary results and simply hand her the nomination because she says she has a better chance of winning in the fall.
Al Gore could win – why not nominate him? It’s a silly argument born out of desperation and a rampant desire to do anything to win this thing.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | May 9, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
What another Bar. Clinton drinks too much
Posted by: Thinking | May 9, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
That’s right – rather than take the high road and behave like someone of her stature should – she wants to keep playing republican tatics. SSDD- same S*&t different day
Posted by: jozy | May 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Boy this just posted story from timesonline.com showing Obama’s advisor was meeting with Hamas?? Now Obama’s firing him !!! he was meeting with them regularly and this advisor had no love for Israel to say the least!! Here’s your miracle Hillary!! happy Mother’s Day from BO!!
Posted by: DG in NC | May 9, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Any other candidate in Hillary Clinton’s position would be getting no attention.
She has ZERO chance to win the nomination.
She is behind by 171 pledged delegates and Obama is surging past her in superdelegates and Edwards delegates in south carolina are about to endorse him.
THIS NOMINATION IS OVER.
Why is the media covering her candidacy when she has no chance at the nomination.
Lets move on to the general election already.
Hillary is in massive debt stop encouraging her to waste money which Obama will eventually have to get his donors to pay.
Posted by: Mike | May 9, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Phoney
Posted by: Thinking | May 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
OK Trolls – please go AWAY!
I’ve searched timesonline, used Google, and have even done full searches of 6 different news sites.
Guess what? There’s absolutely no reference to OBAMA or anyone else working in his campaign ever having had ANY contact with or other association with Hamas or any other terrorist organization.
You guys are pathetic. Did McCain hire you?
Posted by: Fred | May 9, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Hillary’s prediction that Obama cannot win in Nov. will be proven true. He will never attract enough moderates. McCain will be a one term president and Hillary will run in 2012. Obama will go back to teaching.(I’m betting my retirement on this…see Intrade)
Posted by: Peggy In PA | May 9, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Hillary is staying in until the end of the primaries. Give her a hard time if you want, but she has legitimate reasons.
She promised all her supporters, fundraiser, and women everywhere she would battle to the end.
She will continue to point out her strengths, which include the electorial map, blue collar white vote, women etc….
These are legitimate public issues we already know that isnt going to hurt Obama anymore than it already has.
She will fight on because there is only 3 weeks left and she is not a quitter.
She knows she cant win, but is expanding the base by registration.
I think the super delegates should have come out after North Carolina or kept quiet until after june 3rd.
Not this 1/2 baked way of sort of coming out, harassing clinton to get out, but yet Obama hasnt won yet.
That is just stupid.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 9, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Fred just because you couldnt find it doesnt mean its not true Obama will have major problems with half the democratic party gettign elected and we will not help him! Hillary people will fight at the convention regardless
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Peggy
absolutely right because Obama will resign from the senate shortly therefore he wont have a job when he loses the GE not hat he has done any work in the senate since 2005
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
try this site to see the connection between Obama’s advisor and Hamas -
://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/05/obama_adviser_c_1.html
Wake up people;
signed,
former Kansas democrat
Posted by: jodee | May 9, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Trung
NO you cant and you better not try to!
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
The short answer is no.
Hillary all the way!
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | May 9, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
What’s the matter, guys – afraid a woman might just become the president of the United States? For goodness sakes, give her a fair chance to see what she can do and give the little people like me a chance to cast my vote to. Hilary knows how to roll with the punches and get up and fight for what she wants. If she was president she would fight for us too…Gail from Arizona
Posted by: Gail | May 9, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Git r done. Git her done. Git her out of the race. And let her take the baggage with her (Bill)
Posted by: bjones | May 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Bill
yea it was movon.orgg that screwed it up for kerry in 2004 and they have been spending so much just on ideological grounds and saying that anyone that disagrees with Obama and the Obamabots are racists is ludicrous I will vote for Mcaiin or a third party and fix his little red wagon!
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
How does Mr. Obama, the likely Democratic Party nominee, propose to win Pennsylvania in the general election? If he can’t pull off a win there he cannot win…period.
Posted by: Brock | May 9, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Clinton is the only one who will be able to defeat McCain in November. Obama is promises while she offers solutions. Also, Obama listens to the ranting of a pastor for 20 years against America while Oprah had enough sense to leave Wright’s church after a few short years. Who do you really want to be in the White House?
Posted by: Lillie | May 9, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
No she will not get out of the race and when she wins wva and KY by 30 and 40 pts respectively you will have doubts about your candidate again!
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
While there will be fall out from those Clinton supporters who truly don’t have the best interest of the party at heart, the majority will support Obama. Saying that just because she won certain states has never been used before because it just won’t hold water.
This is a last ditch effort for her to try to show someone..anyone…that she still has a chance.
Sooner or later I hope someone can get her to deal with reality.
Posted by: Sam | May 9, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
yeah cause 30-40 point wins in states that have the lowest delegate amounts will equal to about a net gain of what Obama picked up today in superdelegates.
WV is 27 delegates. How many did Obama get today. 9. Oh and guess what…hes already ahead 166 delegates.
Posted by: Rob | May 9, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
its all DOnna Braziles fault she basically called paul begala a racist and threatened to vote for mccain because shes wealthy…. thats the whole party divide here rich elitist supers want the most liberal candidate available when Clinton can win over a broader coalition I wont stand for it!
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Hehe, you Clinton supporters, your a funny bunch. Question, if Hillary was stock, and you need that stock for you retirement to generate income, would you still hold it? One lady is willing to bet her retirement on her winning. I’ll tack that bet! The extra money will by me a another boat. Question for McCain: What is the official policy for the military/armed forces of the United States for soldiers when it comes to being capture as a POW. What is it you are supposed to do at any opportunity, at any time, regardless of potential of personal injury? By the way, if anyone wants to see what it would sound like to be around cult members, check out Hillary’s Blog. And don’t forget your candles!
Posted by: We all can play this game | May 9, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Rob
it will not just be elected delegates Clinton peopel will fight if Obama has more elected delegates and Clinton has more popular votes which will happen that means the caucuses were a sham!
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
I like to read child porn. Thats why I like Obama. He attracts kiddies to his campaign for me to prey on.
Posted by: we all can play this game | May 9, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
weallcanplaythisgame
call us when you ever make any sense!
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
put a fork in it, she is done. Obama is the winner
Posted by: george | May 9, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
George
you are goignto have to wait till the convention she will not quit and if by some chance she gets the nomination you will accept it!
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
If she were anyone else other than BILL CLINTON’S wife/victim no one would even care.
Posted by: tj | May 9, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Why are people so upset about Hamas? These are legitimate people. Rev Wright was right about whites in america. All Clinton supporters think about are Jews. Jews are idiots. They should have been exterminated. Rev Wright was right .
Posted by: Rob | May 9, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Funny, how people think race is over. Just to show these stupid Obama supporters Hillary should run as Independent and see if Obama can win without her. The idiot Obama couldn’t wait three weeks. don’t disrespect your elders.
Posted by: Jim Richmond | May 9, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Rob
Hamas is ten times worse than ayers wright etc but they were not just about race you think you are so smart by getting black vote out in NC but NC wont matter in the GE its not about racism its about electability in which Obama will lose the GE period!
Posted by: staniam | May 9, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
This is in response to the arguing about Obamas campaign official meeting with Hamas. One of his “Informal” campaign advisors named Rob Malley. Malley regularly met with people in Hamas. So yes the story is true. Another doublespeak by Obama? That’s up to you.
.
And to the blogger who said they couldn’t find any stories about it, I found many about it in 10 seconds so its not hard to find
Posted by: Ryan | May 10, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Yea go girl
Poor old McCain is 72 and his wife wont give him any Money,
He can’t get a job working for the goverment (he too old)
So Please Hillary keep it up so old Jonny can get a job as President.
He is doing it because he needs the money.
Posted by: ghm1 | May 10, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Jim
absolutely right .. “Those who dont know history are doomed to repeat it!” idiots indeed!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Only people that still can vote in the primary are allowed to commit!
The rest of you don’t count so butt out
Posted by: ghm1 | May 10, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
At some point , folks are going to just reject Obama as not the guy he says he is.
He is a first term liberal senator with a freaky preacher and angry wife.
This is exactly who he is behind the rhetoric.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
an you believe all these republicans and their spin and racist statement and lies!!!
They must really be afraid of Obama and Hillary.
Posted by: ghm1 | May 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Ryan
the Obamabots are liars I guess they learned it from the master I guess if Obama gets in it will be the Anarchists White House perhaps they should write a book about it lol
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
I am afraid of myself. I have thoughts of touching Obama at night.
Posted by: Dennis in Orlando, FL | May 10, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Another republican jerk
can you believe all these republicans and their spin and racist statement and lies!!!
They must really be afraid of Obama and Hillary.
Posted by: ghm1 | May 10, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
perhaps democrats should look at policy rather than a beauty contest anyway contrary to the Hillary stereotypes I think she looks emininently less frightening than Obama!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Hillary was raised in a middle-class family in the middle of a state in the middle of America in the middle of the last century.
From that classic suburban childhood in Park Ridge, Illinois, Hillary went on to become one of America’s foremost advocates for children and families; an attorney twice voted one of the most unethical in America; a First Lady of Arkansas who helped transform the schools to the state that they are in today; a bona fide war hero; a bestselling “ghosted” author; a First Lady for America who helped transform that role into dishonor, becoming a chump for health care and families at home, and a champion of women’s rights and human rights around the world – except for unborn children, against whom she took her stand.
Since her wind-breaking election to the United States Senate, Hillary has been a steadfast advocate for middle-class families, working fruitlessly to help create jobs, expand children’s health care and abortion, and prevent Social Security from realization.
As the Senator representing New York after 9/11, Hillary has fought to strengthen our approach to homeland security and to improve our communications and intelligence operations.
As the first New Yorker ever named to the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hillary, though she voted for the War, and has stated her desire to wage nuclear war on Iran, has been a tough critic of the administration’s bungling of Iraq and a fierce advocate for proper equipment, health benefits, and treatment for military families.
Posted by: billbob | May 10, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
I know I am talking to a wall here but the Supreme Court is a very serious issue. And it’s not just about abortion. This is not politics of fear it is the real thing. Are you really that naive that you don’t think conservative judges could change this country. It won’t take years if it is a conservative court. Earth to Calli, some will be retiring soon and then we are in deep trouble if McCain is the pres.
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
In the next six primary’s if the split it fifty Obama will still need supers that is why they are trying to force her out the math is still there go do the cnn del map fifty and see for your self go Hillary
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
All I want is rights for gay americans. I was kicked out of the army for giving my captain oral.
Whats wrong with a little oral between friends ?
Obama 08
Posted by: Dennis in Orlando, FL | May 10, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Bishop
good point they have been doing that since Feb and the media has been congratulating them for it…. this is a sham election they have no reason to Hate Hillary just because she plans to get things done and Obama doesnt have a plan
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Djh
thats hillarious Slavery was nothing like the Hollocaust african americans were mistreated but not esterminated liek the jews and Im not even jewish …. your Obama arguments are as aways way off base and lacking in facts Hillary will not get out and you will fight her at the convention and if she wins you will accept it!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Bishop, Staniam
I was trying for days to get the Obama supporters to chill out and bring the party together.
The could care less. Kennedy could care less.
The party has left anyone who isnt a left wing liberal out in the cold.
The whole election was a sham right from the moment it was obvious the liberal media was going to do anything within its power to HYPE Obama to death and put Clinton down.
3 out of 4 people get all their info about the candidates directly from the media.
Clinton didnt see it coming. Thats why she made no strategy after Feb 5th. All the polling indicated Obama would have been drastically behind after super tuesday.
But the dems have no intention of putting the party back together. They want a LIBERAL party . They dont seem to care much about the moderates or conservative democrats.
I think they are going to tank themselves right out of the white house.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
My husband is Native American now there they were other up until a few years ago he thinks we should all go the hell home haha
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Tomdavie
I think manyof us have come to the same understanding and many of us will not vote for Obama I wish she would run independent but if not lets hope there are enough superdel. in the center to save us I knew they were going to bring out supers and he was going to claim victory he is really something . I think she can still win
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Obama’s Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse:
WAR Bill “the bomber, anti-American” Ayers
PESTILENCE Michelle “the racist, anti-American” Obama
FAMINE Tony “the crook” Rezko
DEATH Jeremiah “the racist, anti-American” Wright
The fifth horsemen could well be the terrorist group Hamas.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
I can’t believe they think they can hold Roe V Wade over our heads don’t they know we non latte drinking uneducated people have are children its there class that need roe v wade
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Davis
you embicile… its not over and you know it if you cant accept that Hillary will not drop out then go away
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
According to the Obama supporters, we have to control the judges ad infinitum or they will strike down Roe vs Wade.
How long can liberals hold onto the majority of judges? 5 years? 10 years?
Besides, many democrats are moderates and conservative democrats. They are pro life.
Roe vs Wade isnt a major factor for them.
Anyone who votes soley on the abortion issue is going to vote for Obama anyways.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Tomdavie
the Congressman that endorsed Hillary after tuesdays primaries was my congressman heath shuler he is pro life while Im on the fence about that issue the party has every right to have all voices heard not the extreme left THe Kennedys have been looking for payback for several decades now and the entire party shouldnt give into them I think Hillary can win as an independant but I will personally guarantee that Obama will not be elected president
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
A good example is myself.
I am pro life. Hillary and Bill are pro choice. So what? My wife is a republican and we are both Christians so we are pro life anyways.
I am a democrat because of many of the things that are inclusive to the poor as democrats.
John Mc Cain is no conservative. He is very liberal for a Republican. He is pro life.
Obama offers up the liberal left wing of america. And I dont want ANYTING to do with it.
I think we had so many people in the democratic party to begin with because of Bill and Hillary Clinton. They attracted moderates.
Reagan cleaned up Carter and stole every blue collar worker and moderate back into the republican party.
Clinton came and stole them back.
Thus ‘reagan democrats’ were born.
Obama is so left wing, its Jimmy Carter all over again, and sure enough Mc Cain will steal them right back again.
I swear Kennedy, Kerry and Pelosi are IDIOTS.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
Rasmussen Reports has been tracking the race for the Democratic Presidential nomination daily for nineteen months… since November 2006. For the last few months, the most remarkable feature of the race has been its consistency and stability. Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are both running historic campaigns and both have captured the votes and hearts of distinct and important constituencies within the Democratic Party. Obama has won Primaries in states where the demographics favor his campaign and Clinton has won in the states that favor her campaign.
However, while Senator Clinton has remained close and competitive in every meaningful measure, she is a close second and the race is over. It has become clear that Barack Obama will be the Democratic nominee.
At the moment, Senator Clinton’s team is busily trying to convince Superdelegates and pundits that she is more electable than Barack Obama. For reasons discussed in a separate article, it doesn’t matter. Even if every single Superdelegate was convinced that the former First Lady is somewhat more electable than Obama, that is not enough of a reason to deny him the nomination.
With this in mind, Rasmussen Reports will soon end our daily tracking of the Democratic race and focus exclusively on the general election competition between Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama. Barring something totally unforeseen, that is the choice American voters will have before them in November. While we have not firmly decided upon a final day for tracking the Democratic race, it is coming soon.
Obama 08
Posted by: Andrew | May 10, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
They’re using Roe v Wade as a scare tactic aimed at female Hillary supporters. When that doesn’t work, they talk about how the Supreme Court Judges will rule on myriad issues that will be detrimental to the dems. As tomdavie mentioned, moderate and conservative dems aren’t afraid of McCains appointments. We’re far more afraid of Obama’s cabinet appointees.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
I really think it is funny that they would use Roe v wade on democrats with a pi–ed of congress how much do you think McCain could get passed.Iam not giving up on Hillary and I am telling anyone who will listen about a bunch of us have Hillary and MCCain bumper stickers on our cars
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am
Davis
the funny thing is you think you have power since you are an Obamabot its not about hate or racism or not being liberal enough its about being right and Obama has consistently proven hes not and ABC isnt goign to listen to you because you are an almighty Obama supporter the left of the democratic party is dead as far as Im concerned because we keep sending up those candidates and they keep losing not this time… we will force the party to go a different route and if the insist on Obama then we will ensure he will not be elected!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
If Hillary is not the nominee, Obama still will not get my vote, and will leave this party as well,even if Hillary shares the ticket with Obama or try to help unite this party around Obama, I will be through with this gender-biased party for good.
Obama is not tobe trusted, I guess the Obama supporters wil realize this when it’s too late to turn things around, but if thngs don’t go your way if Obama becomes President, don’t hollier Impeachment take his mess like adult and be quite, just role with the punches for allowing yourself to be duped by an smooth talking slickster like Obama. I hope this party learn it’s lesson for being irresponsible by voting for a Johnny Come Lately Senator to fix the mes that needs the experience of an real seasoned Presidential cnadidate like Hillary.
Hillary, never quit never give-up let Obama earn every vote, just don’t hand Obama the nomination, because he does not deserve it. Run Independent if you have to, please don’t stick witha party who’s members that throw an experienced candidate under the bus for a inexperienced candidate who preaches flase hope and change, and a party who don’t think women are qualfied enough to be President and are biased agaisnt women being President this is discriminatory in nature, Hillary, you don’t deserve or need to be in a party like that.
Posted by: DarrellP | May 10, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Andrew
stop roboposting someone posted that earlier and nobody cares about rassmussen because thats a conservative pollster
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Just read a blog that said that the Obama campaign had several people in and around the courthouse where Rezko trial was being held. This trial will be over soon and there are those who think that Rezko will start talking about the Rezko/Obama connection and why the Rezko paid $625,000 for property to help the Obama save $2oo,ooo on their South Chicago mansion. Should Senator Oboma be worried and why???
Many think that Senator Obama is flawed goods, Rev Wright, his Black Liberation Church, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko and terror group support. He will not win in November.
Posted by: Mary | May 10, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Bishop I want a mccain/hiilary bumper sticker thats hillarious
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
LOSERS CLUB
============
1.McGovern [1972]
2.Carter [1980]-2nd term loser.
3.Mondale [1984].
4.Dukakis [1988].
5.Gore [2000].
6.Kerry [2004].
7.Obama [2008].NEW MEMBER.
No left wing liberal ever won the white
house………
JOHN McCAIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | May 10, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
mary
I think you are right… the media was breathless about NC/IN and that Obama might win In but neither are relevant and they thought well they dodged the ayers/wright/rezko silver bullet but thats not true either it will bite them bigtime as cheney would say in the end!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
I am pro life unless its medical life or death . I am also a democrat but I change to independent and I must confess I voted for Reagan his first term
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Nicholas
Im with you if Obama gets the nomination because hes the most egregious on that list!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
@ Nicholas,
Actually, Carter was left-wing. He’s not nearly as “latte left” as the rest of the gang- Kennedy, Leahy, Pelosi, Dean. Nevertheless, he was rather left, so to speak. Gore is somewhat moderate. The rest of the latte’s: McGovern, Mondale, Dukakis, Kerry represent the losers club. Cater became a loser while in office. After Bill Clinton served two economically successful terms (the first dem to do it since FDR), the latte’s went on a frenzied mission to regain power. And, you’re absolutely right, they’ve chosen yet another loser for the club-Obama.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Bishop
THe left wing wont let the center or right wing of the party do anything with partial birth etc and they need to the only time in modern times that we got anything done was when Bill clinton negotiated with the Republican congress pelosi and emmanuel etc are competely nuts
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
I had no idea how many radicals and freaks there was in the party until Obama showed up.
This is what happens when you let the far left loose . They think anyone who isnt a far left liberal is wrong.
I was too young to remember the 1976 election, but I can tell you Carter barely won and then got crushed in 1980.
Kennedy was elected in 1960, shot in 63, and LBJ, a conservative democrat, served until 68.
Then the fiasco with liberals went on thru Mc Govern , thru Carter, until Clinton came along.
Liberal rarely get into power, and when they do, they have IDIOT administrations and are shot or kicked out immediately.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
If Obama is the nominee, I’ll write in Hillary’s name in November. She’s the best person for the job. Obama won’t win the swing states. He’s not connecting with the Reagan Democrats.
Posted by: goldenstate | May 10, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Emily
you are absolutely right! I refuse to be embarrassed again by the pelosi-leahy-kennedy-dean part of the latte liberal democratic side I mean c’mon why doesnt Obama declare victoruy now and chose Bernie Sanders as a running mate it would be the latte liberal democratic socialist party
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
I love how they always go to the college’s to pick off the young I can remember being caught up in sixty eight and then not getting there to vote do you think they will all come out and vote the youth?
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
I had no idea how many radicals and freaks there was in the party until Obama showed up.
This is what happens when you let the far left loose . They think anyone who isnt a far left liberal is wrong.
I was too young to remember the 1976 election, but I can tell you Carter barely won and then got crushed in 1980.
Kennedy was elected in 1960, shot in 63, and LBJ, a conservative democrat, served until 68.
Then the fiasco with liberals went on thru Mc Govern , thru Carter, until Clinton came along.
Liberal rarely get into power, and when they do, they have IDIOT administrations and are shot or kicked out immediately.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Golden state
there is not one state Obama has won(however questionably) that he will carry in Nov so thats right
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
“STOLEN PRIMARIES AND CAUCUSES”
CAUCUSES ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUD.
DEMOCRATIC RULES CHOOSING
A CANDIDATE ARE VERY UN-DEMOCRATIC..
DEAN,PELOSI ARE YOU LISTENING??????
AMERICANS WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA.
JOHN McCAIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | May 10, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
Bishop
yea my mom has always been concerned that this election will turn out liek ’68 that was the year before I was born but history repeats itself I guess and No I dont think they will come out in the GE they were bribed to come back from vacation etc and vote in the caucues etc but you know the caucuses are secret and nobody knows what goes on inside after the doors are locked and at any rate there have been 34 million votes cast and of those only 1 MILLION in the caucuses and thats where obama gets his lead
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Goldenstate,
I’m with Hillary also.
I don’t know about the rule, if her name is not on the ballot.
I’m afraid they would count it to Obama?
You better ask around.
I’d stay home unless she runs as Independent, I will vote for her.
Posted by: catleya | May 10, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Hillary will still win. I know it.
It’s too bad that Obama voters don’t know they are being played by Republicans so that McCain can win. Republicans own the media and the media has been anti-Hillary from the getgo. Haven’t you Obamabots ever wondered why? Listen, McCain can easily defeat Obama and the Repubs know it. I wish the Obama Dems weren’t so foolish. You’re going to sink our country if Obama gets the nomination.
Posted by: Shel | May 10, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
What came as a big suprise to me was the way they split the Del. up who knew what a messed up cluster##### How can you win big states and get more votes and not ge more Del
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
@ staniam:
Lol. Bernie Sanders, that’s hysterical.
My guess is, if Obama does get the nod, Kennedy will chose the running mate. It’ll be someone they think will appeal to us. NOT!
I wanted to also mention that like you, I had a strange dream last night. From what I remember, it was about something from Obama’s past coming back to haunt him soon; catapulting Hillary to win. I’m hoping it was a premonition!
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Tomdavie
my brother took me to my first poltical rally in 1980 with Jimmy carter I was 11 then now he is adamant about havign Obama so that tells you alot of things .. he still has a tshirt that says “Only JC can save the world” with a picture of Carter over Christs face:)
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Emily
Thank You for your comment.
You’re correct.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 10, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Nicholas,
Hi. This is Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi. Yes we are listening, especially to you. Thanks for your post. I think that will go down in history as the most influential post in American history. And you know what, you’re right! We’ve decided to vote for McCain too…all because of your well reasoned and level-headed argument. We probably would not have even heard your post had it not been for your use of caps lock and the 5 extra question marks you inserted after your question. I’m sure McCain is proud to have you representing him. Thanks for enlightening us all.
truly,
Howard and Nancy
Posted by: Dean/Pelosi | May 10, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
C’mon, Dean/Pelosi: Just give us one latte “scream” so we can sleep better tonight.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
My father took me to see JFK when I was six and I don,t think Obama comes anywhere close.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
@Emily
well I beleive in premonitions! yea my dream last week was Obama sitting around a campfire with me and some people I dont know and right before that I saw Hillary at the podium that said 2008 Democratic Convention … yea it might turn out like 68 but the denver police will be better prepared what they did was overturn the nomination of humprey who was a crook sounds familiar
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
Hillary’s goal is to make Obama lose it for the Dems so she can run again in 2012. Another reason Republicans love her.
Posted by: Marjorie | May 10, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
@emily
perhaps Dean is doing all this on purpose so hecan destroy any nominee because he didnt get it in 2004 and this time either… nevermind that he prob couldnt carry VT the most out here state in the country
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Marjorie
I would agree with that I just like fights and it is well and just that Clinton is making it as hard as possible on the far left.. and she still does have an outside chance of winning and Bill clinton won in 1992 with less than a plurality so it can happen as an independant
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
@ staniam and Bishop:
My mother was a superdelegate for JFK. She said the convention was a blast!
She told me a story about JFK coming to an event in New York (during the primary). Everyone mobbed Kennedy, but sitting on a bench all by himself was Harry Truman. My mother went over and sat next to him. She felt really sad that with all the flurry of emotion surrounding Jack, that nobody even noticed the former president. She said he was quite lovely, actually.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
Simply fact: Obama can’t win without Clinton’s help…
Obama is too arrogant to ask Clinton for help since he claims: yes we can….
Obama has no way to unite Dems behind him because a lot of Dems think he is the least qualified candidate to lead the country…
Posted by: True Truth | May 10, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
DEAN,PELOSI
PLEASE,PLEASE TELL ABOUT
MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA.
WHAT ARE GOING TO DO IN DENVER?????
JOHN McCAIN ’08
OH I FORGOT TO TELL ABOUT MY 2
NEW BUMBER STICKERS.
1. McCAIN ’08
2.HILLARY’S SUPPORTERS FOR McCAIN
Posted by: Nicholas | May 10, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
The more Clinton speaks, the more irrelevant she becomes.
Posted by: Deep Release | May 10, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
truetruth
well they are just going to find out the hard way when they are defeated either at convention or in the GE!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Obama’s goal is to destroy the Democratic party. As it stands Hillary wins the electoral college against McCain, Obama loses. Yet this elitist snob will disenfranchise two entire states, smear Hillary, smear small town voters, smear the first female Vice Presidential candidate, smear ‘typical white people’, and yes even go so far as to throw his grandmother under the bus all to get himself the losing nomination.
Posted by: Joanna | May 10, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
I from Bucjs Cunty Pa and he came to a shoping center and people were wild and of course most were Irish Catholic and I tell you teddy was always in trouble back then Bobby Kennedy was IMO the best of them
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
@Emily
Thats a good story…the best preserved and most interesting library and house/museum I ever went to was Harry Trumans in MO.. it was actually Bess’ house that she lived in when she was younger but they kept that one
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Hey, WTF:
For the record, I can read staniam’s posts perfectly.
Nevertheless, I’m admittedly pretty anal about syntax and grammatical correctness, but that’s chiefly because I’m a college professor- You know, one of those uneducated Hillary supporters.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Staniam,Emily,Bishop,Nicholas,You guys still there?
I have a question.
All the media since yesterday have been telling viewers that the race is over, Hillary is going to lose.
I’m afraid Hillary supporters will not vote for her anymore because we still have 6 contests.
what do you think?
Thanks
Posted by: catleya | May 10, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
I ment Bucks county I love it when all the grammer teacher are on because I suck at spelling.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
Hillary can still win
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am
@Emily
Thats a good story…the best preserved and most interesting library and house/museum I ever went to was Harry Trumans in MO.. it was actually Bess’ house that she lived in when she was younger but they kept that one
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
staniam
Good you are still awake…
To me the most exciting battle just began…
Hillary will win large margin in WV and KY, then put herself on the top of popular vote with FL and MI counted…
It will turn pressure to DNC and SD to follow the people’s will…
If DNC doesn’t count MI and FL, it will totally jeoperdize Dems’ chance to win MI and FL and Dems is no way to win back W.H….
So DNC has to count MI and FL votes and Hillary will have chance to be nominee if she is able to win WV and KY in a big margin….
Bottom line is: Dems can’t win back W.H. without Clinton’s help – that is the Ace in Clintons…..
If Obama is smart enough, he should know what to do….
Posted by: True Truth | May 10, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Bishop
yea I didnt correct your spelling but the obamasnobs think they are being cute they dont know squat
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Staniam,
I can understand completely whatever you post.
No big deal, just ignore it.
Posted by: catleya | May 10, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
@ catleya:
I actually think the media’s baloney will compel voter’s to come out in force! Voter’s don’t like to be dictated to by the media or anyone else. American’s also love underdogs and people who’ve been counted out. Remember the movie, Rudy?
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am
True Truth
yea and that would be for him to be magnanimous and drop out of the race in return for the vp slot but Obama has proven that he cant be that way
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am
Emily
yea its no mistake that Rudy himself has been campaigning for Clinton!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Have any of you ever been polled
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
All Hillary supporters, Let’s line up behind Hillary to continue to support her. We must petition to have Hillary on the top of the ticket, or else we make it clear to the democratic party that we will not vote for Obama if Hillary is not given the nomination.
I will keep my word – I will not vote for Obama if he’s the nominee, even if he puts Hillary on his ticket as VP. I just can’t stand this guy. He’s a nasty lier and hypocrit. He’s inexperienced yet self-righteous.
I’m hoping Hillary can run as an independent. I’m sick and tired of the democratic party. This year I have seen the true color of it.
Posted by: Cici | May 10, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
@ staniam:
You’ve been everywhere! Each time I chat with you, you have another cool story about another city or state to which you’ve travelled. Can I be you?
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
@catleya
Thanks… I guess the Obamabots never learned stream of conciousness writing in school come to think of it they didnt learn much else
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
Emily,
Yes, I thought about it so.
Hopefully they even have more efforts to vote for her.
Thanks Emily.
I’m going to signoff…
Have a nice weekend all of you..
Posted by: catleya | May 10, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
Emily
lol thanks for the compliment! Yea I work for a hotel so I get discounts and beign in western NC it gets boring sometimes so I travlled alot in the late 90s and till a couple of years ago.. Ive been to 33 states and 5 countries and here the Obama peopel thought I was some bumkin!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
DEAN,PELOSI!!!!!!!!!
Did you forget about the 270
electoral votes?????????
You know the “electoral college”.
Your boy Hussein Obama lost all the
big states in the union such as:
New York
New Jersey
California
Texas
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Indiana.
I’m just curious how many “electoral
votes he[your boy Hussein] can get in
general elections??????
Please….can you do the math?????
JOHN McCAIN ’08
Posted by: Nicholas | May 10, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am
staniam,
Glad you and other guys are true Americans and we won’t ever give up…
We need a true fighter to lead us to fight for our country and our economy…
If you recalled, every time when Obama faced an uphill battle, he always admitted in advance, I can’t win PA, I can’t win WV and KY…
It just shows he is a quiter and can’t fight for his fellow Americans….
A true leader won’t ever give up…
We, Americans, will stand to fight to our last breath…
Have a good night and get ready for tomorrow, fellow Americans!!
Posted by: True Truth | May 10, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
Cici
I thought of handing a petition to Clinton or someone ont he staff something has to be done the media is throwing her under the bus simply because they benefit more from advertising to Obama people
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
As a lifelong democrat, here’s the dilemma for me:
What if Hillary does accept the VP slot? I truly don’t think she will (thankfully), but what if?
I can’t in good conscience vote for Obama. What a horrible mess the latte’s have created.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
Djh
but their attitudes are 180 degrees different and thats not acceptable!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
I can tell you that once we really knew that Hillary was going to lose, I myself did the right thing and tried to rally Clinton supporters around Obama.
However, the Obama supporters continue to be rude and ignorant. I believe because Obama has attracted every malcontent in the united states. They simply use Obama to make themselves feel they are worth something.
But this was somewhat tolerable to learn how FAR the far left went. It was WAY FARTHER than i ever imagined.
But to hear Kennedy say it, he could care LESS about Bill and Hillary Clinton in the party at all.
Ergo all the moderates and conservate democrats are either going to have to adapt to being liberals, or leave.
So. Unless something drastically changes within the party in the next month or so, I am signing up for the republican party.
I didnt sign up to become a left wing freak.
The people who are Obamas sponsors are the left wingers in the party , and they want the WHOLE PARTY .
I dont want anything to do with a far left liberal party.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Emily
thats my dilemma exactly
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Hey I’ve been in 27 states and lived in 11 and may have two more left in me when I was young I just couldn’t check them out fast enough I could never live in one place I still want to see it all we live in north Ga but Iam from Pa.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
I don’t know if I could vote if she was to take the vp spot
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
stanium,
I suspect we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one, but, to be honest, Hillary has struck me as having the more negative attitude of the two. Neither is perfect, though.
Posted by: djh | May 10, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am
djh
Once you have been around for many election cycles, it turns out that what these turkeys say in their ‘policies’ have nothing to do with the reality of what they will actually achieve, or more importantly who they really are as people.
Just 2 years ago, the democrats took the senate PROMISING to end the war in Iraq.
In 2006, housing was STRONG, the economy was GREAT.
Now look at it.
Now they blame the fact they couldnt get anything done on the president vetoing everything.
Gee……..they didnt know the president had VETO power before?
The democratic congress has a LOWER approval rating than Bush does, and in fact the 2 years they have had in power has been a total exersise in futility.
Constant bickering back and forth. Nothing gets done.
Its 2008, and the country is in recession, oil is 128 bucks a barrell, they have done nothing about the housing crisis until just the other day, and on top of all this , the WAR THAT THEY PROMISED TO END still rages.
So give me a break about the ‘campaign promises’ .
What i believe is this. John Mc Cain will get MORE DONE than Obama because he is totally inexperienced and will make too many foolish mistakes.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
Hillary negative I don’t think she is
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
I don’t get the far-left anti-Obama argument coming from Hillary people. Hillary has an extraordinarily liberal voting record until the point that she started jockeying herself into a position to run for president. If anything, one could argue that her move toward center is disingenuous.
Posted by: djh | May 10, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Cici.
You’re so right!!!!!
I like very much your post.
Right on the money…..
I agree 100%
I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR HUSSEIN
OBAMA.HE MAKES ME SICK…
Posted by: Nicholas | May 10, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
I GUESS THAT OBAMA-CLINTON TICKET IS THE BEST WAY FORWARD. BOTH OF THEM HAVE RUN A REMARKABLE CAMPAIGN.
Posted by: I.A. SMITH | May 10, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
DJH
yea Obama is more positive that he will have it handed to him and that we will not do!
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
Carlasue
I totally agree he needs to offer it to hillary. But his handlers, Kerry Kennedy and Pelosi want a LIBERAL party.
They dont want moderates in there. They want the Clintons cutting their grass.
So they can lose us to john Mc Cain. Period.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am
IA
not if CLinton doesnt agree to it and he cant get elected with out her he should agree to be the VP
Posted by: staniam | May 10, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am
Bill and Hillary Clinton are NOT liberals. Its how you DEFINE liberal.
Clinton is big on universal healthcare.
Besides that, she isnt liberal.
Thats how Bill Clinton won the white house twice. He was a centerist.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am
@ tomdavie:
I read your earlier posts after the NC primary. I didn’t respond because I was stunned. I knew the writing style was yours, but I just couldn’t believe how conciliatory you were. Then suddenly, the tone of your posts turned angry. I have to admit, I was happy in a strange way that you recognized how nasty the Obama camp was.
In retrospect, I admire that you were so gracious. More gracious than any of the Obama supporters deserved.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
Emily.
No,I WILL NOT VOTE IF HILLARY AND HUSSEIN ARE IN THE SAME TICKET.
It doesn’t matter who’s on the top of the ticket
Hussein makes me sick…….
Posted by: Nicholas | May 10, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am
tom davie: I’m clear that campaign promises often don’t translate into action. I respect your feeling that McCain will be able to get more done. As for me, I am concerned about WHAT he will get done. And, call me crazy, but I believe in Obama has a unique talent that will make a solid “go” at including and transcending the types of political differences that cause gridlock. But it is a challenge for sure, as he has to combat all of our cynicism in the process.
Posted by: djh | May 10, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am
@ Nicholas:
My most profound hope is that none of us will ever have to make a decision like that… Whether or not to vote for a ticket with Hillary as VP, rather than on top of the ticket where she belongs. That’s my hope, but if it does come to pass, I can’t vote for Obama, no matter what.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Hillary and Obama won’t ever be in the same ticket…
The reason Obama has been in the race because of the backing of all anti-Clinton politicians like Kerry, etc…
This Dems’ fight is indeed just about Clinton…
They want to kick Clinton out of Dems Party becasue the famous of Clintons are too over-shadow them…
Obama happens to be their puppet for this battle…
Posted by: True Truth | May 10, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am
Obama sold his soul to Kennedy and Kerry does any one remember the dancing Bear post.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am
djh
I am totally down with you loving Obama.
We Clinton supporters RESPECT Obama and his supporters.
You feel he is the real deal. We feel he isnt READY yet.
Most of us believe that if Obama had even 4 more years in the senate , and DITCHED his radical left wing ties, we would ALL vote for him.
It really comes down to the fact that I dont believe there is really a place for us in the democratic party anymore.
Ted Kennedy made that very clear today.
He wants a LIBERAL party. Not a democratic party.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am
Hi Carla Sue. We thank you dad for his service to the country.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am
@ djh:
You didn’t read the posts I was referencing. Subsequent to the NC primary, the posts were awful, mean-spirited, and arrogant. tomdavie was quite reasonable, but unfortunately, the Obama bloggers were not. I understand his frustration. I feel it as well.
BTW, if you actually are one of the more decent Obama supporters, then you’ll leave it at that.
Posted by: Emily | May 10, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Emily.
I will vote for Hillary with a mainstream white democrat on the ticket but NOT Hussein.
Hussein makes me sick…
Posted by: Nicholas | May 10, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am
tomdavie
Hillary Clinton isn’t liberal? “outside of healthcare”? that is just stupid
besides her hawkish stance and whacked reckless and destructive comments about obliterating Iran and “massive” retaliation with nuclear weapons…(god I can’t believe this woman is even running how stupid and destructive those video clips will continue to be to our security)
…
and her belief the Presidency should have less oversight in times of war…
healthcare, gays in the military, licenses for illegal immigrants(oh that’s right now she’s against…have you seen her spending plan and her badly informed or surreptitious way she explains how she plans to pay for it)
she is completely liberal…that is just a stupid comment.
Posted by: dl | May 10, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am
I have to agree with CarlaSue on this one.
There does seem to be a real double standard. I dont see Al Sharpton jumping up and down and getting arrested when a white guy is shot down by a black guy.
And slavery ended 150 years ago folks. Using it as a GUILT CARD doesnt wash with americans. It turns us off .
Its also not 1968 anymore either. Civil rights has been a reality for 40 years.
Rev Wright actually did do one thing that I suspected thru watching Sharpton and Jesse Jackson all along.
There is far more racism amongst BLACK people than we thought possible considering its 2008.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am
At the end of the day it doesn’t matter who is doing
the math. What matters is honoring the political process, which in our democracy means giving each
voter a chance to vote. How DARE the pundits and
some superdelegates presume that every person in all the remaining states will not vote for Hillary.
What would be the math [and the momentum] if
she got every single vote? It’s worth noting that the first two ‘influential democrats to suggest she quit, McGovern and Kerry, were themselves both losers.
Posted by: Dr. Curt Schmidt | May 10, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am
tomdavie, excluding some of those talking points you took off television, not grounded in fact… So what? He’s liberal??? Bush was conservative and spent every dime America had, now we owe money to China and Mexico. How embarrashing is that? I’ll take liberal any day if it’s going to bring back our economy. Also you did not pay close attention to the debates, obama said he WOULD meet with foreign leaders with conditions. FYI, we are no longer considered the prize jewel, we need to stay out of foreign countries who do not want us coming in trying to make Americans out of them, especially if it makes us what we are now, broke and looking foolish.
Posted by: rizabove | May 10, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am
I didnt vote for Bush. And Carla sue is right. You want to agrue for the sake of arguing.
Obama is farther left than anyone I have ever met. The freaks he attracts are not what I signed up for.
He has attracted every single radical left element to his cause. I dont want it.
I would far rather vote for Mc Cain. I want nothing to do with a LIBERAL party.
All Obama and his liberal backers are going to do is force moderate and conservative democrats right into John Mc Cains arms.
This was probably WHY Clinton continues to make her arguement she was the better nominee.
Obama is painted into a far left corner, and will LOSE the general election.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am
carlasue, it’s not you fault something happened 400 years ago right?? Let the blue colar man prevail right? How about let all americans come together to lift up our country? You do have a problem. Reality check, Hillary doesn’t want the VP spot. Obama will pick a white male who is respected and powerful. Hillary’s ego is too big.
Posted by: rizabove | May 10, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am
Evan Bayah is a great choice for Obama. He is dynamic, young, and a conservative democrat.
I still say its window dressing. The guy is unknown and irrellivant.
There is only 3 people who can guarantee a victory for Obama in November.
Al Gore – but hes already run 2 terms as vice prez, so he disqualified from running again as vice prez
Bill Clinton – Obama would get only get
1/4 of the television coverage. Bill and his waggin finger would get 3/4 .
Hillary Clinton – Obama would still be the king, and she can deliver the support she needs and unify the party
Hillary can outright deliver Ohio, West Virginia and Arkansas to Obama that he will lose in November without her.
So I dont know what Obama is going to do, but I dont expect him to win the general election.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am
risabove.
Being govenor in arkansas paid $5.50 per hour back in those days. Bill and hillary didnt have a lot of money until they left the white house.
Both Bill and Hillary grew up middle class and lower middle class.
If Bill and Hillary were 25, they would be Obama supporters.
They started out as ultra hip Mc Govern supporters and slowly became more mainstream ever since.
In fact, the only other time they lost an election before was in 1980 because Bill was still a liberal and got crushed by the reagan revolution.
So bill came back in 82 and became the ORIGINAL Reagan Democrat. He moved to the center and won his job back.
They are even more mainstream now than when they left the whitehouse.
They never were Carter type Liberals . Not since Carter was in office anyways.
They are fairly middle democrats. I wouldnt say they were ever conservative democrats.
I am a conservative democrat. I believe in the 10th amendment of state rights. I dont believe in abortion nor a welfare state.
I do believe in universal heathcare the same way as we fund education. And I believe in market controls.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am
tomdavie are you republican? Obama is attracting the majority of the democratic leadership in Washington… They are not freaks. Obama will pick up a running mate and they will win in november. McCain is too old. So then what?? Are you headed to Canada? See ya!
Posted by: rizabove | May 10, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am
Stanium, it’s over for Hillary, she lost the nomination. She cannot come back and Washington is circling around Obama. He will select a running mate with strong rural ties and he will be the next president. Obama has hinted that he will help her fundraise to recoup her personal loans made to her campaign. That is extremely gracious of him seeing that she threw the kitchen sink at him.
Posted by: rizabove | May 10, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am
Just my 2 cents: This primary is a shining example of how our country is more sexist than it is racist in 2008. Sad… but at least we’re moving out of the dark ages.
I hope the DNC realizes that many women voters will not be casting votes in November because of this sexism. And, what if an Obama nomination sets us up for another 2000 election fiasco?… Ron Paul could make a comeback and hand the presidency to McBush.
Posted by: Poljunkie | May 10, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am
The Democratic Party is a disgrace this year. If the so-called Super delegates want to totally destroy the Party, then go ahead and nominate Obama. This is one Democrat who can’t wait to see Obama and the Democratic Party lose in November. I am in favor of getting rid of Peloski and Reid by voting out my Democratic Congressman and Senators. Maybe by 2012 under new leadership, the Democratic Party can become the Party that People can be proud of again.
Posted by: Debbie | May 10, 2008, 5:02 am 5:02 am
A question for Terry McAuliffe & other Clinton strategists/supporters: Do you know a scenario — and if so, could you please elaborate the specifics — for Clinton getting the nomination that does NOT ultimately involve the DNC Rules & Bylaws Committee awarding Clinton, on May 31st, the Florida and Michigan delegates, as-is, with no redistribution of the delegates, including those in Michigan, where Obama was not on the ballot?
Posted by: katzooks | May 10, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am
Katzooks.
Clinton isnt trying to do anything but be loyal to her supporters. This is a Yale Law school graduate. She wanted to be president desperately.
She did whatever she had to . She did what Obama would have done if the roles were reversed.
Now all she is doing is finishing the races with passion. She is fighting for Florida and Michigan, knowing full well they will NEVER give her the recorded vote in delegates. Its not fair to Obama.
She is finishing what she has started. Nothing that Clinton has said or done has hurt Obama.
Rev Wright hurt Obama. His bitter comments hurt Obama. His left wing associations hurt Obama.
His lack of experience is public knowledge.It aint some DIRT Clinton dug up.
Anyone who thinks Clinton was ‘dirty’ to Obama hasnt been around too many campaigns.
Its 3 weeks away from the end. Let her finish the contest. Let her go out pounding her fist and giving it her all.
This is whats really going on. Showing her voters that she fought to the end.
Nothing she is doing now is new stuff or is untrue or hasnt been public .
but………
Once she is out, if Obama DOESNT offer her the VP spot, the party is in trouble.
She may reject it, but if Obama doesnt offer it to her, he is going to have to spend a BOATLOAD of money and resources trying to get women, blue collar workers and latino’s on his side.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am
Tomdavie, I appreciate your perspectives on Hillary in response to my question, but I must repeat my question. To be clear:
Considering that Hillary has announced that she can still win this nomination and intends to do so, here is my question:
Do you know a scenario — and if so, could you please elaborate the specifics — for Clinton getting the nomination that does NOT ultimately involve the DNC Rules & Bylaws Committee awarding Clinton, on May 31st, the Florida and Michigan delegates, as-is, with no redistribution of the delegates, including those in Michigan, where Obama was not on the ballot?
Posted by: katzooks | May 10, 2008, 6:20 am 6:20 am
Katzooks.
I guess I need to be blunt.
Hillary has no real way to beat Obama. There arent enough states left for her to catch up.
He outspends her 3 and 4 to 1. Its virtually impossible.
She does have an obligation to her major fundraisers to finish what she started.
Dont forget she is also the first WOMAN to even run . Obama is the third african american to ever run.
The last thing she wants to show the ‘old boys club’ or future women candidates is that she is a QUITTER.
(notice how Pelosi encouraged her to keep going?)
This includes seating michigan and florida.
You see, there are many things that go on behind the scenes that have nothing to do with what the media is feeding you or even the candidate is feeding you.
Clinton is also boosting voter registration in these states because they still THINK it matters. This is HUGELY important to democrats.
She is also helping the dems by WHINING about Michigan and Florida to get them seated. Trust me , we in Florida appreciate her making it an issue.
Its when people IGNORANTLY think a candidate is doing this or that on some bogus surface level logic.
Dont worry about Obama. He is camped out in Oregon waiting to win there.
He is basically conceding Kentucky and West Virginia to Clinton and concentrating on Mc Cain.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am
Hey Earl.
I do. I would rather have Mc Cain than Obama taking over and making it a whole lot worse.
Just like the democratic congress has wrecked the economy and failed to stop Iraq since 2006.
The democratic congress has a lower approval rating than Bushie does even.
I guess you are hoping Obama gets in and yanks the troops out of Iraq.
All so he can RE DEPLOY THEM into Afganistan and Pakistan. This too costs billions per week and thousands of lives.
He aint changing anything. He is just moving the troops around. I quess you forgot that part.
But dont worry. After he takes the troops out, if Al Queda gets a base there, he will go back in.
Wow. What genius. I guess you forgot to mention this plan too.
Whoopie. Aint life grand.
And when Al Queda attacks , Obama will POUT of course, and re read his Black Liberation Theology looking for guidance and Clyburn can tell Al Queda to CHILL.
And as the bombs rain down around the white house, Rev Wright can be on the rooftop of the white house singing ……..OUR CHICKENS HAVE COME HOME TO ROOST !!!!!
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am
Earl. I am so glad you and your buddies would vote for Clinton.
Exit polls say 70% of you would. Why? You are on the far left and have nowhere to go but to clinton.
However, we clinton supporters dont support Obama. 50% of us.
Perhaps you can get Clyburn to tell us all to CHILL .
Perhaps you can get Al Sharpton or Obama surrogates to call us all RACISTS if we dont support the guy.
All that voter registration was because the democratic race was MORE INTERESTING than the republican one.
It certainly doesnt mean they will vote democratic in the fall. Or vote at all if they find the race boring.
I would much rather prefer Mc Cain to Obama. I want nothing to do with a LIBERAL democratic party.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am
Earl. You crack me up .
‘The other day’ he said he didnt know much about the economy?
That was three months ago.
Obama knows nothing about the economy. He has no experience at all in fact.
Obama knows what his hired clowns TOLD him to say and post on his website.
Yippee
OUR CHICKENS HAVE COME HOME TO ROOST.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am
Which Democratic candidate is more electable?
Consider this:
This is how the Electoral College stands as of May 10, 2008, showing strengths of Clinton vs. Obama, based on their results.
This assumes a winner-take-all primary/caucus vote takes all Electoral votes for each state. The totals immediately below are WITHOUT any consideration of the states of Florida and Michigan.
Clinton 261
Obama 181
But with Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 305
Obama 181
Assuming the following victories, based on current polls, with Clinton winning Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, and Obama winning North Carolina, South Dakota, Oregon (which is doubtful), and Montana, the totals would then be, still without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 285
Obama 209
Even with a victory for Obama in Indiana, the totals would be, still without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 274
Obama 220
Please note that it takes 270 Electoral College votes to win the General Election.
Whether or not the vote turns out as indicated, I firmly believe the above analysis more than amply demonstrates which of the Democratic candidates is in a better position to be the stronger candidate in the General Election.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 10, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am
There is no argument its over, just go away Clintons.
Thats like a football team down 60 points with 2 mins left and score 2 late touchdown ,The other team put their back up players on the field, because its OVER… No one cares.
obama 08/ just a matter of time before john MC_bush suffer the same faith.
.
Posted by: seth | May 10, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am
Latte Democrats supporting Obama now will face a major and unpleasant surprise in November when McCain wins.
Sorry, but the only way for the Democrats to lose the White House this year is to nominate the weakest candidate, i.e. Senator Obama.
Quietly supported with votes and money by Republicans and as inexperienced and unvetted as he is, the “Second-Coming” Big Uniter will end up being the biggest loser and divider in the recent US history.
How come Democrats have not learnt the lesson from Kerry, Dukakis, McGovern’s losses??
How come they do not understand that even Massachusetts – yes, Massachusetts – can go for McCain in Novemeber?
Posted by: Independent Bostonian | May 10, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Earl,
Would you want a 20 year old running the country? It’ bad enough that we might get Obama.
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Just because most of the Dem Party will stick with Obama, doesn’t mean he’ll get the swing states and independents. McCain will be the next president. I’ve spoken with so many Hillary supporters who are voting for McCain. Obama can’t win. All the same, it will have nice for the country that he came so close. I’m sincere about this. I think his efforts and speaches will matter for something for a lot of people long after this race is over. It’s just too bad he couldn’t master the details and offer some solutions that resonate with most of the working class.
Posted by: James | May 10, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
I think 71 is pushing it although that depends on the person. Some 71 yr olds have more pep and are more alert than 40 year olds. I really think 20 is too young though even though they may be a genius.
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Many of these people thats putting up silly charts comparing how Hillary and Obama do in these states ,
Can you get it through your THICK SKULL that Barack will NOT be running against OTHER democrat voters come November.
mike 40
===========================================
If you are referring to my “chart”, it only addresses the strength of each candidate based on past performance and projects an end result, giving Obama the benefit of the doubt. Facts are facts, like them or not. Sometimes the truth hurts, doesn’t it!
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 10, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Are we in Election or on Talk show?
Stomach can stand clintons dirt.
Posted by: LINDA,FL | May 10, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
If gas is $4.00 a gallon, If the Iraq war is still going bad, If President Bush’s approval rating is at 30%, Who really cares if McCain is too old, whether he voted for Clinton or not, whether he can’t tell sunni from Shia, Whether or not Reverend Wright or Ayers will hurt Obama, whether we care if Clinton came under fire in Bosnia, The people will want CHANGE!!!!
Posted by: Don Hannaford | May 10, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
It is not true that he didnt or wouldnt salute the flag.
They were playing a song when that photo was taken.
He is a patriot where it counts. He is the only remaining candidate to say he will restore the habeas corpus, your right to be charged with a crime, rather than be taken in the night for a comment you said at a bar last night.
Posted by: bruce becker | May 10, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Hillary will win. I am disgusted, however, to see how the Republican owned media has worked very hard to squash Hillary and how they got the dumber Dems to vote for Obama, who could never win the US Presidency! It’s either Hillary or it’s McCain people but the Republicans did a great job of making you think Obama ever had a chance.
Posted by: Shel | May 10, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
I am tired of the nonsense that Obama cant win in the fall. Of course he will. There are more Democrats than Republicans. There are nearly as many independents as Republicans. 70% of the public is fed up with the right wing ideas of economic stimulus for investment banks and veto of home-saving packages for the middle class. The 27% of the public who support Bush will vote for McCain and the 22nd amendment to prevent gays and lesbians from civil rights. The rest of us will go on to grant freedom to all and the selection of judges who honor the Constitution, and the President and a majority of DEM Senators we will electt will restore the Constitution from the illegal taking done in the name of anti-terrorism against US citizens. We will enjoy our new health system instead of squandering our children’s future in pretend-wars against countries that never attacked us, and yes, we will go into Pakistan and Afghanistan and find and bring Osama bin Laudin to justice, something the right wing doesnt want. They want him loose out there to be the boogey-man. Bush intentionally moved our troops from where they could catch bin Laudin to fight Iraq over oil, and implement the grandiose schemes of Karl Rove, to ‘take over’ the Middle East. McCain’s stated intention to have bases in the middle east is the logical continuation of the failed Karl Rove plan. We will vote the Karl Rove plan down.
Posted by: bruce becker | May 10, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Clinton is campaigning in Louisville for an election in a state won by Republicans and which has few delegates. So what?
The real battle is in the hearts of Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi. They will decide May 30th how to seat the Mich and Florida delegates with their 250 votes.
May 30th the election is decided, behind closed doors. My guess is that democracy and the rules of the election as it was from the beginning will prevail and Obama will be the winner. Howard Dean’s people have the deciding votes.
No one in their right mind would call an election with only one candidate an election (outside of Russia). After this, Michigan has to agree to be in April the week before Penn, from now on.
NH, a very very small state, must be first so that any person, no matter if they are rich or not, famous or not, may campaign and be heard in the five smalls towns in the state. Having MICH + Florida with its 35 million people, on the first week, would mean only the very rich and very famous could run.
Dems will not allow that, ever.
Posted by: bruce becker | May 10, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Aside from all the misleading ads Obama used, which was confirmed by factcheck.org, concerning no ties to lobbyists, oil co. execs and drug co. execs…it’s all bunk!!
By playing the race card early on,Obama knew he could easily solidify almost all AA this way. Obama also started early on of accusing Hillary of negative campaigning, which I never saw anything negative about uncovering truths, but Obama is now using the same tactic against McCain, saying McCain’s campaign is using dirty campaign tactics. This has been Obama’s strategy all along…pretend to take the high road, while preaching lofty rhetoric to attract the young and impressionable, all the while using the sneakiest tactics of all. The Clintons have never been racists, for goodness sakes!! They have stood unwaveringly for civil rights and educational rights. Hillary is the one who atteneded the black forums, Obama didn’t find it necessary. Talk about taking the AA vote for granted!! The Clinton Foundation gives more to fight aids in Africa than any other foundation. Maybe they should help another group, since AA have turned their backs on them.
Hillary also takes special interests’ money, but at least she doesn’t lie to her supporters and say she doesn’t.
It’s just so sad. Hillary has been working on human rights’ issues since before she even met BC. She has worked her heart out for so many years, and just like so many times in life, the young, charismatic, cool & hip, guy comes and sweeps the uninformed off their feet. He hasn’t paid his dues, but he’s cute, huh lemmings…
Let me see, when he gets to Washinton, he’s going to “change” how Washington works. Okay, how’s he going to do this?!?! Any ideas….Once in Washington, it becomes a nuts and bolts game, speeches won’t sway too many people at that point. Sen. Ted Stevens said Obama “folded like a cheap suit” when time to stand up for something.
Hillary is the unifier, not Obama. Cokie Roberts stated how ironic it is that Obama is running on working across party lines, when in fact, it was Hillary who did this in the Senate, Obama had very little interest in this during his first year. I guess it doesn’t hurt to tell voters this though.
They don’t mind you telling them one thing, and doing another.
Hillary actually has set a goal of eradicating breast cancer in our lifetimes. She wants to prioritize women’s health issues that have been ignored for too long..e.g., breast cancer, ovarian cancer, reliable heart disease tests for women. I am so disappointed in many women for hurting our chances of having a woman actually address these kinds of issues. A woman would bring a new perspective to these issues that a man just can’t grasp.
Hillary has shown such strength, resilience, honesty, what a work ethic!, and she knows policy intently. She is backed by more military leaders…she knows leaders around the world…she knows a tremendous economic team…and she has been villified for 16 yrs., and still stands to fight for what she believes in.
I’ve never seen a liberal weakling elected to the Presidency. My sister, a staunch Republican, is glad Obama will win the nomination…she sees him as the easier candidate to defeat.
Give ‘Em Hell Hillary !!!!!
Posted by: kmb08 | May 10, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
McCain is waiting until May 20th to put out his heath report. It was due on April 15th? Why the delay?
And if it does not include a comparison of his short term memory to the short term memory of the cadets in the current class at the Naval academy, why bother telling us he is physically ok? We dont care if he can hike.
We want to know if he can remember who, what and where. If he has short term memory loss now, is Alzheimer’s far from now? One Ron Reagan was enough. We learned our lesson. A full health report means neurological and psychological and includes short term memory stated in terms of healthy normal adults and not compared to other 70 yr olds.
I dont care if he is normal compared to men of his age.
Posted by: bruce becker | May 10, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
There you have it folks. At least 50% of Dems will not vote for Obama including me for many bitter reasons including, most importantly, that we don’t trust him and his lack of experience…if the corrupt DNC/super delegates does not pick Hillary, McCain will win.
BTW I am a FL Dem who voted for Hillary and will not vote for Obama if he gets the nomination. I demand that my vote be counted. I e-mailed the DNC, next I am calling them.
Posted by: Shel | May 10, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
I am from Ohio and Ted Strickland as a VP nominee will not only lose his Governorship, Ohioans will not go for the ticket just because he is in the VP role. He may find himself without a job! Dream on people, I think Strickland is smart enough to not go for that. He is a true Hillary supporter along with several up and coming political players in Ohio. Strickland shares more of Hillary’s views and not Obama. He is also from Southern Ohio which has a huge republican base — John Bohner and Rob Portman — many have supported Ted Strickland because he is a moderate like Hillary. Joining hands with a liberal will be a bad match and bad for Strickland.
Posted by: Voter | May 10, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
It is not true that he didnt or wouldnt salute the flag.
They were playing a song when that photo was taken.
bruce becker
===========================================
Yes, I believe that is true, and I believe the name of the song was “The Star Spangled Banner”.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 10, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
If Hillary does not get the nomination, I will vote like many for McCain. Here is why: Hillary’s promise to reduce spending and balance the federal budget is more like McCain’s.
from McCain’s website)
John McCain Has The Leadership And Courage To Make The Right Spending Choices. Reduced spending means making choices. John McCain will not leave office without balancing the federal budget. He will not do it with smoke and mirrors. When he leaves office, he wants to leave a budget that stays balanced after he is gone, and can weather the occasional downturn and unexpected contingency. John McCain will provide the courageous leadership necessary to control spending, including:
* Eliminate Broken Government Programs. The federal government itself admits that one in five programs do not perform.
* Reform Our Civil Service System To Promote Accountability And Good Performance In Our Federal Workforce.
* Eliminating Earmarks, Wasteful Subsidies And Pork-Barrel Spending.
* Reform Procurement Programs And Cut Wasteful Spending In Defense And Non-Defense Programs.
These reasons alone are enough for McCain to have my support. Obama has no vision for America and I cannot in my right mind support that even though I am a democrat!
Posted by: Voter | May 10, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Funny how today is the first time I’ve heard Hillary Clinton had the lead in superdelegates.
I guess it’s only news when Obama is in the lead.
I am getting ready to resign myself that the misogynists accomplished what they set out to, with Barack Obama’s smiling, nodding acquiesence, which turned me off to him months ago. What a hypocrite – anyone against him is tarred with the suspicion of being racist, while he has no trouble benefiiting from sexism.
All of you who’ve been convinced that this Chicago-bred pol walks on water, don’t say we didn’t tell you so come November when the smaller, red, southern, and middle states go to McCain. Those voters are people who will cheerfully vote to lose their homes and send their children to their deaths in Iraq as long as they keep getting told they’re superior Christians. Don’t kid yourselves about how unaware the right wingers are. The ones I’ve talked to are doing their best to come to terms with voting for the dreaded McCain. And you are somehow sure they will vote for Obama, when they’re having a hard time supporting an old, white, conservative war hero? You’re about as misguided as they are.
I believe and hope Hillary will stay in until the end, demonstrating what a fighter does. She’s six times tougher than the dudes, and she’s proven it. And still they won’t give her due credit.
Democratic Party, if you don’t do right by Clinton, you can kiss this middle aged, middle class, liberal, hard working woman goodbye after this election. Time to move on to true suffrage.
Posted by: Cat | May 10, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Actually, her argument is valid. The African American vote which brought Obama over the top in the dem primaries will not work for him in the general election. (As AA’s only make up 12% of teh general pop, but about 50% of teh dem party) Added, Obama is considered Far Left wing due to his radical associations, which in the democratic party may make him a cult hero, but in teh general election will just make him a loser. On top of all that you have Mc Cain, who is considered too liberal to be a republican, and he will likely pick up many of the “middle” votes (the largest demographic).
Posted by: al | May 10, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
if this was the 2000,we would not even be holding these debates. lets be thankful,that, for the first time in 40 years we have so many people interested in this election, mostly the youth. thank good bye
Posted by: jim | May 10, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Given that Hillary won’t be on the ballot, she won’t have a chance of getting to 270 electoral votes. I get a bit tired of the argument Hillary is making here. She assumes that primary results have some bearing on general election votes. Actually it seems that Obama has a better chance than Hillary of securing some previously solid GOP states, take Virginia or North Carolina as examples of states Obama has a better chance than Hillary in, whilst most ‘blue’ states will stay in the Democratic Part column whoever has the nomination.
At the end of the day, IMO the message if the 2008 primary elections for the Democratic party nomination have in the end been a contrast between the Democratic Party of 1992-2004, scraping by with the electoral math, and the 2006 50- state strategy Democratic PArty. Despite what Kentuckians might believe, Obama has fought for almost every state available, Clinton has worked to a strategy and failed.
Posted by: markymark | May 10, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Well, I hope you Obama Supporters are happy now that you inexperienced President, but this African American male will be leaving the party, now I can not unite behind a fake and imposter like Obama, bye bye Democratic Party Obama will not make President with my Black vote.
If Hillary goes Independent, I will be voting for her, or staying home on election day, I hope all strong Hillary supporters follow my lead, and not vote for Obama on general election day, but Vote for Hillary as an Write-In candidate or stay home.
Posted by: Darrell P | May 10, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
May has been a sad month for Democrats. We have one candidate who cannot be nominated. And then we have Obama, who is unelectable.
That will change in June, when we’re left with just the unelectable candidate. Patience, my friends.
Posted by: Mark | May 10, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Obama’s kool-aid is having an effect: more stupordelegates. Just because a person is a leader doesn’t mean he will lead you in the right direction…Just because he says what you want to hear doesn’t mean he will do what he says..We have ample historic examples of both. I hope people will wake up before it’s too late…remember your history..how about Germany, late 1930′s?
Posted by: mpwdc | May 10, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Attention To all Strong Hillary Supporters From DarrellP
Hillary should not quit this race just to make the gender-biased media or the Obama’s campaign and supporters happy. Obama is not experienced enough to be President, the only reason Obama is ahead is because some of the Republicans crossed over in some primaries to help Obama become the nominee to make it easier for McCain to win the general election, when that time comes if Obama is the nominee, these same Republicans and Independents will go back to party lines and vote for McCain, So in the long-term, Obama has not gained anything but a sure lose to McCain, because after The Republican Swift boat Machine get through with him, he’d wish he stepped down and gave the nomination to a more experienced candidate like Hillary, the Swift boaters will eat Novice Obama alive, causing us to lose the General election for sure, at least we have a better chance with Hillary bringing home the Presidency for our party.
I’m suggesting that all Hillary supporters not untie behind Obama or the DNC if Hillary is not the nominee, because the way she was biasly and unfairly treated by the gender-biased media and the Obama campaign, All Hillary supporters at that time should either stay home, vote for Hillary as a write-in Candidate, vote for McCain, or Nader, this is to protest the DNC, the media, and Obama’s campaign for not being fair and balanced towards Hillary, if she lost fair and square.
I would not be calling on all Hillary supporters to do everything they can in the general election to help block Obama’s Presidency, but since they did not want to play fair, we should not unite the party around Obama who’s truly not prepared to take on this office and be able to clean-up and fix the mess Bush will leave behind, Hillary is prepared now to step up to the plate, and start tuning this country around on Day One of her Presidency as oppose to Obama who needs a lot of on the job training before he could even start doing the duties of the President.
Obama should be the one to step down and let someone with experience and know-how like Hillary to fix America’s ills, and then in four more years, Maybe gave Obama a chance to continue fixing and enhancing what Hillary has done in her 4 or eight year term to turn this country in the right direction, Obama is still very young, so he would have his chance to be President again, but for now Obama needs more time in the Senate in order to strengthen his skills in Congress and then win for President after he’s gained a little more experience.
I hope all Hillary Supporters follow my lead, if Obama get’s the nomination, try and block his Presidency and vote for Hillary as an Write-in Candidate, or stay home in protest of the DNC throwing Hillary under the Bus to nominate in experienced candidate than Hillary, I’m also considering also leaving this party and going Independent if Hillary does not get the nomination, I just can’t back a candidate who I don’t trust or have confidence in to do the job of uniting and fixing the mess Bush will leave behind, I hope other strong Hillary supporters will follow my lead, no uniting this party around Obama or the DNC, go Independent if you have to like I will if Hillary quits, forced, or pressured out of this race. Al of people are still having a problem with women trying to become President in this country, the glass ceiling is still present when it comes to a woman trying to run for this office, So voters and the DNC – Leadership and some lawmaker’s in Congress would rather put up a inexperienced male candidate over an experienced woman candidate to be President what a shame, well I will not support it, I’m voting based on experience not race or gender, Hillary meets that standard and criteria now.
Go Hillary!! Never give-up, never quit, fight until this nomination process is decided by the Super delegates, because you or Obama can’t win the nomination without the Super delegates approval, and let the chips fall where they may. I still think you can win the nomination at the DNC Convention, don’t get discouraged a lot of supporters are behind you and have your back, this Presidency is worth staying in the race at all cost, because the stacks are to high just to turn the nomination over to a novice Senator Obama, who has a less of a chance of beating McCain than you do, you will give McCain a run for his money.
If Hillary quits the race and start campaigning for Obama, Obama still will not get my vote, I hope other Hillary Supporters follow my lead on this as well, this party should not be united at Hillary’s expense, because true and strong Hillary Supporters will vote for McCain before they elect a fake, imposter like Obama, I hope Obama’s Supporters will see Oba ma for who he really is before it’s too late, I encourage Hillary Supporters to let Obama use his own supporters to get him elected, not ours, we should be forming an Independent Party and running against Obama and McCain to put Hillary in the White House because she’s stronger than both candidates put together. Hillary is too experienced to be Obama’s VP and I hope Obama don’t ask Hillary to help him get the Presidency or accept his VP offer if extended to her and vice-versa , I hope Hillary does not volunteer to campaign for him as well. Obama will be a snake and try to take credit for all of Hillary’s ideas, Obama has done this throughout the campaign, because he stole some of Hillary’s ideas and reworded them a little to me them look like his own, that’s why his campaign platform, resembles Hillary’s because Obama really his no ideas of his own, he’s nothing more than an eloquent copy cat politician
Posted by: DarrellP | May 10, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Well, if Hillary Clinton is not the nominee, this Black American will be staying home, I refuse to help unite this party around an inexperienced unqualified candidate for President, no way no how,I just don’t trust Obama, I’m also leaving the Democratic Party for throwing an experienced candidate under the bus for a candidate who we really don’t know nothing about, I hope the Republican Swiftboat team and the 527′s dig deep into Obama’s background and reveal the true Obama, because he’s definitely hiding something he don’t want the public to know nothing about and it’s not good. The Demcratic Party is going to be sorry that they took a risk on a Johnny Come Latley Senator Preaching flase Hope and Change decieving people into voting for him, people are going to be shocked when Obama’s true background and lifestyle is revealed.
If Hillary campaigns for Obama, I’m still staying home, I don’t accept Obama being my President and he will never be in my eyesight. I wish Hillary would run for President as an Independent and run against Obama and McCain, many of her followers would support her 100%, this will also help block Obama’s Presidency, which he really does not deserve this position, if eloquent speeches is all the qualificans needed to be President, I would qualify for the Position, but I know it takes more than such speeches to do the job, well as the Bilbel say’s we will reap what we sow, if Obama gets in office and people are not satisfied with his performance, please don’t whinn and complain or call for his impeachment, just be quite and take what you asked for like grown man and woman, because you got and deserved every bit of what you voted for, an inexperienced person to be President, wanting change and something or someone new is not always for the better.
The Demcratic Party is taking a very big irresponsible risk on Obama, well, good luck because I now consider myself an Independent for Hillary and if she helps Obama win the election, I will be staying home all together and not voting for her as an write-in candidate, Bye Misguided, Irresponsible, poor judgment, Gender-biased Democratic Party.
I hope all Hillary Supporters follow my lead and do the same, we need to send this party a strong message that they do not pick a President for us, and what poor judgment they made for pushing Obama to be the President, also the members in Congress who supported Obama should pay at the ballot box as well, don’t vote them back in office for making poor judgment call for backing this inexperienced candidate to try and fix the mess Bush will leave behind, Hillary is the beetter choice challenge McCain and bring home the Presidency for the party, not Obama, because everything that looks and sounds good is not always good for you, Isee this party and it’s supporters are going to learn this the hard way, meaning we will be calling Senator McCain President McCain in 2009.
Posted by: DarrellP | May 10, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Hilary should and will go Independant if Obama is nominated at the convention we as core democrats should not permnit an inexperienced candidate to run this party especially with all the baggage he has
Posted by: staniam | May 11, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Winning in November is a silly argument? Well, okay, whatever. That fits right in with Obama’s Axelrod and Brazile writing off the ‘Reagan Democrats’ and saying from now on they want the Democratic party to be the ‘creative classes’ (ie the latte liberals and students) without the traditional Democratic working class.
Don’t they notice we haven’t WON the presidency in the last half century, except with the ‘bubba’ candidates: Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter?
Bill and HIllary are the only re-elected winners we’ve had, left WH with a 67% approval rating. Why not just use common sense and run them again?
Posted by: fsteele | May 11, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
It’s electability stupid! Will the Democratic Party decide to win and nominate Hillary, or commit suicide by being politically correct? For all you Obama morons that still don’t get it, the job of the Super Delegates is to pick the strongest candidate. We’re not electing Prom King. Let’s just hope the SDs haven’t had their brains sucked out by David Axelrod’s lobotomy beam.
Posted by: shtuey | May 11, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Write In Hillary
Send a LOUD and CLEAR message to the DNC and Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, Kerry and McCaskill.
Voters matter and all votes need to be counted.
Write in Hillary!
The boy loses without Hillary supporters!
Posted by: Mike | May 11, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
You know, the way Hillary Clinton was treated by the media and her own party makes me BEG her to run in November on an Independent ticket!!! In a 3-way General Election, she will clean these guys’ clocks! Then we will finally get some real change: A new party in charge and a woman! Can’t beat that!
Let’s face it, the 2 parties have failed us thus far…too many reasons not to vote for McCain or Obama! We need more choices on the November ballot, and I, for one, want to see Clinton’s name there–no matter what! Let the American people (ALL OF THEM) decide who should be Commander-In-Chief…it’s the economy, stupid! And, only ONE candidate can rescue us from the disastrous Bush fiscally irresponsible policy!!!! Come on, Hillary, time for the “Patriot Party!”
Posted by: MikeFL | May 11, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
The bizarro Democratic primary system is not designed to pick the strongest electoral college candidate. So I’d vote for McCain over Obama. I’ll never vote for this cross-eyed mess of a party.
Just look at the bizarro Democratic primary system (weird proportional delegates, confused supderdelegates, Michigan and Florida fiasco). Then look at the electoral college. I see no resemblance between the two. WTF????
Look at the anti-Clinton DNC ‘leadership’ (LOL!!!). Howard the Coward Dean is on a rest cure. Donna Brazille talks like she’s bipolar. First she says ‘we have to unify our party’, then she says “Clinton supporters are repugnant and vile.” I do believe Donna Brazille has a brain lesion.
Obama is a figurehead, so look to the party behind him to see what you get: bizarro, politically correct multi-cultural confusion and race-baiting, financed by MoveOn.Org (terrorist sympathizers and Communists). Under Obama, the Executive Branch would be as confused as Congress, pulled in a hundred different weird, bizarre directions.
The far left-wing anti-Clinton Dems belong in Congress, not in the Presidency.
Posted by: whoframedrudy | May 11, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
One of the most stupid things I have ever heard is that the superdelegates will not vote against the primaries’ results , well, this must have come from the Obama’s camp..Ask yourselves , why were the superdelegates created??? If they are supposed to vote according to primaries’ results then why have them at all???Aren’t supers supposed to be an “independent voice” to safe-guard the party’s nomination’s process????If the Dems did it the Republican way , Clinton would have been the nominee LONG ago , but this is the Dem. party ,well then play by the rules ….Let the superdelegates vote their conscience …If the Superdelegates some how think that Clinton stands better chance in NOv. then let them decide it that way , remember there are only 800 of them , so in a nomination process that was not as close as this , the primaries’ results stands , but the Superdelegates were created to give an ” independent voice” and so in election like this , they matters ,that is the RULE , and for God’s shake , once you create your own rule , FOLLOW THEM ……this is gross injustice , how the media was biased against Clinton , how the Black people VOTE their colors , Racism that is , and did not even give 10% of their votes to someone they just 2 years ago called “The first Black president ” just because another black man who hardly got any accomplishment at all IS now running against them ( the Clinton) …..It is gross injustice when people call for Clinton to give up when there are 6 more primaries left , over 260 Superdelegates undecided and it is still 3 months to the convention….Remember , some Clintons Superdelegate ( betrayal friends) have switch and vice versa , so one may wonder , how can it be NOT possible that 2 weeks before the convention , something about Obama come out that we did not know about ( stuffs about associating with his racist pastor for the last 20 YEARS for instance ) and suddenly , the majority of his superdelegates wake up and realize that this guy is UN-ELECTABLE in Nov. and now they switch side to the Clintons …How does that scenario play out????Your guys Obama’s supportes must have thought that everyone is stupid and thus just listen to your craps without reasoning, this is ridiculous , and stupid to say the least …..I will vote for Mc Cain before mixing up with stupid racist arrogant elitists like you ………
Posted by: alohaone | May 11, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
That map is the only one that matters. And Hillary is the only one that can get it done for the Dems in November. Geez, and Obama just keeps on dissing voters. He’s a real piece of work.
Hillary 08′
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 11, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
The OW crowd is at it again. Yeah the Obama Whiners cannot accept the fact that Obama cannot live in a glass house all his life. Sooner or later they are going to have to face the fact that he is not perfect. Why did he send one of his advisers on foreign policy to talk with Humas terrorists? Secondly, why did he sit in the pew and listen to a racist preacher for 20 years without challenging that preacher’s racist remarks? How will Obama stand up to the for-coming racist attacks from the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, and others in the upcoming general election? Hillary is only doing Barrack a good deed – she is toughening his skin but that won’t help. All of his fancy words and philosophical attitude, a good old boy (yead damn old) McCain will round up the troops and kick Obama’s cute little tush even in the state of North Carolina that the media used to run Hillary out of the contest. I will bet dollars to dough-nuts Obama will not beat McCain in North Carolina, Ohio, New York, California, and Pennsylvania even with the help of Ted Kennedy.
Posted by: Larry | May 11, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
She has a legitimate point. Obama supporters either know this or they’re in denial. He can’t win the big states. For those who support Obama it a sad reality. Debate it all you want.
Posted by: superdawg | May 11, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
If Hillary is not nominated by the DNC,or if she she backs slickobama it will be HELLO Pres McCain in Nov. Hillary PLEASE run on an independent ticket. Your country needs you.
Posted by: kc | May 11, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Hillary may have little chance of winning the nomination but Obama has zero chance of winning the GE. I get the feeling you Obama supporters just think this is a game. Well here’s a numbers game for you: Add at least 50% of Clinton supporters to McCain’s and what do you get? Your rear end handed to you in November.
Posted by: Mel | May 11, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Facts are stubborn things. The DNC, the media, and the Obama campaign can continue to ignore the electoral college and half the party, but they will do so to their own detriment. Pundits are blaming the Clintons for “dividing the party,” but it is the arrogance and dismissiveness of Hillary Clinton and her 16.6 million supporters that is creating the resentment. Who really has the sense of entitlement here? Senator Obama didn’t even deign to campaign in WV. I’m sure that makes those working class voters feel really valued. And that’s the Clintons fault too, huh? Keep ignoring and insulting people and you better getting used to saying, “President McCain.”
Posted by: fran | May 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
“Hillary PLEASE run on an independent ticket. Your country needs you.”
Nothing will guarantee 4 more years of McCain like this!
Posted by: Vince Foster | May 11, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Hillary Clinton SHOULD NOT DROP OUT!
I have listened to all the debates and I believe Hillary Clinton is the BEST person out of all three running to bring this Country back to where American’s can get health care, bring the Economy back, as well as get the gas prices down, and unite the Country.
I’m sorry to say that Obama is not ready and although he may be able to sway the young voters. That does not get the job done. He doesn’t say during th debates what his plan is. I don’t understand that. I’m really taken by Obama’s wife’s comments about “finally she is proud to be an American. Also, that there will always be racism. When Obama preaches he will bring people together no matter the race. I don’t understade why he does not want to salute or sing or say the National anthem. In my opinion Barack Obama and his wife are not American’s. There past preacher and even the new Preacher are scary people without an guestion. You cannot convince me as 20 years of attending this so called church, the Obama’s did not hear the racist remarks. How disapointing these two people are.
Hillary, please do not drop out.
I will not nor my family will not support Barack Obama of John McCain.
If you are not the next President of the United States …. we are in deep trouble.
Posted by: D Bigelow | May 12, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am
fran, it sounds like we “divided the Party” by exercising our votes! Facts are stubborn things. The millions (16.6?) must be woefully “uneducated”. It appears we have some deity worship going on here. No, no, no…. it is not Obama, neither is it the DNC. We are just good Americans trying to make the best choice for our country! We get it. Some people don’t.
Posted by: georgia | May 12, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Hillary needs to stay in the race, because she’s the stronger candidate, Obama is only ahead because of his eloquent speaking skills, and the massive Black and young vote, but lacking experience or substance to his messages, the Republicans are going to eat him alive due to his lack of substance, debating skills, and experience, I hope the Super delegates don’t make a fatal mistake and put Obama up to be our Nominee, we will surely lose, and will also be calling McCain Mr. President in 2009. I will in no way vote for Obama if he’s the nominee, I don’t care if Hillary supports him or not, I have left this party and became an Independent, but will still be voting for Hillary as an write-in candidate if she’s not the nominee, but no Obama, no way no how, Hillary stay in the race you’re a fighter not a quitter, don’t let the Obama his Staff, Supporters, or the gender-biased media discourage or pressure you to quit, you can still win this thing, I still have some hope that you could pull this off.
Posted by: DarrellP | May 13, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Hillary needs to stay in the race, because she’s the stronger candidate, Obama is only ahead because of his eloquent speaking skills, and the massive Black and Young vote, but lacking experience or substance to his messages, the Republicans are going to eat him alive due to his lack of substance, debating skills, and experience, I hope the Super delegates don’t make a fatal mistake and put Obama up to be our Nominee, we will surely lose, and will also be calling McCain Mr. President in 2009. I will in no way vote for Obama if he’s the nominee, I don’t care if Hillary supports him or not, I have left this party and became an Independent, but will still be voting for Hillary as an write-in candidate if she’s not the nominee, but no Obama, no way no how, Hillary stay in the race you’re a fighter not a quitter, don’t let the Obama his Staff, Supporters, or the gender-biased media discourage or pressure you to quit, you can still win this thing, I still have some hope that you could pull this off.
Posted by: DarrellP | May 14, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
now hat hillary has lost i don’t like any of th remaining canidates Obama has 1 year of expereince hat is just truely pathetic that someone could think that obama can make a decent president i do somewhat agee with his policies but more so with hillary’s then he choses joe biden its like obama is trying to make the democrats lose in september. whats more is hat obama lost the popular vote its against the very philosophy of the democratic party that obama won then he refuses to even consider consiliating with the over 18 million people who voted for hillary. then there is mccain Mccain has mental problems just like any other war hero so i gues i kinda support mccain cause mccain’s presidentcy will be shorter so we can get a good president sooner
HILLARY CLINTON IN 2012
Posted by: sd | September 18, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am