How Badly Is the Presumptive Democratic Nominee Going to Be Shellacked in W.V.?
Doesn’t look good anecdotally for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in West Virginia this Tuesday.
Party insiders say Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., might beat him in the Mountaineer State on Tuesday by 30 points.
Yikes!
You want to know why superdelegates are trickling but not stampeding to Obama’s side? His electoral weaknesses with white working-class voters, as evidenced by this pending stompage.
Of course, that doesn’t change the daunting delegate math for Clinton. West Virginia has a mere 28 delegates, followed by Kentucky (51) and Oregon (52) on May 20; Puerto Rico (55) on June 1; and Montana (16) and South Dakota (15) on June 3.
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Obama gets the nomination anyway, Clinton’s followers hate him even more, and McCain wins the general election.
Posted by: Buford Gooch | May 10, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
He doesn’t get the majority of the uneducated white vote in a democratic primary in Bubbaland, we get it. What’s your point exactly? Idaho, Wyoming and Utah, all voted for him in their democratic primary. Yeah, I know those states don’t count as far as Hillary is concerned, but the point is WHITE people from real small states voted for Obama. He can win them over.
Bush has a 27% approval rating–John McCain is a third Bush term.
Who will uneducated white voters vote for in November? Will they vote based on racial bias or will they vote in what is in their best interest?
McCain – “I don’t really know much about economics, I’ll have to study on that.”
Posted by: Bobbi | May 10, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Bobbi,
Think, those states were before Rev. Wright and Ayres and “small town” people totting their guns and clinging to their religion out of bitterness.
I do think that makes a huge difference.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 10, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
The “trickling” has nothing to do with lack of support. Obama has had massive superdelegate support since February. The trickling is strategic. They don’t want to appear to be shoving HRC out of the race. You’ll see 3-10 every day until he clinches. Which he will easily do by May 20th. He’s only 157 away from clinching. Which means he needs only 5-10 more days of steady superdelegate support, and 100 delegates from the remaining contests (an easy task – even after a whooping in Kentucky and WV)
Posted by: Junior | May 10, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
call me uneducated I’m for Hillary
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
He will be beat bad, but this is no surprise. Still it isn’t enough to overcome Obama’s lead. It is a good thing that there are a lot of states that vote.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Obama supporters need to stop acting like an education is a virtue.
Posted by: Tina D | May 10, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Oh yea 3 more supers today, and one of them a previous Clinton supporter. Drip, Drip, Drip.
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
If Obama wins the White House, his rating just might be down to that lucky 13% in two years. Voters, think about that. Bush supporters did not know his
ratings would dip so low either. Voter, please vote for the candidate that has the best interest of American families at her core and not for those who think radical socialist and Marxist beliefs should be the norm. VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON Wanna see my 3 college degrees, you Obama nuts.
Posted by: Mary L | May 10, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
I love that Obama’s perceived weakness with “white working class voters” is so pushed as impending doom. But, Hillary loses 92% of blacks and when Obama wins…its’ deemed a “black” state…smh
Posted by: really | May 10, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
No Way Obama can win WV or Ky…..
WV AND KY ARE CLINTON COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: keith1212 | May 10, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
What Hillary supporters and the media tends to forget is,
Obama won Wisconsin, Missouri, Iowa, Nevada, Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Kansas, North Dakota, Utah, Nebraska, Maine, Vermont, Wyoming and Connecticut
Majority of white voters
The fact is, Obama has won more “white” states then “black” states
Posted by: Vanessa | May 10, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Obama could NOT win with must the Black vote. Maybe we should be talking about the difference between the Whites who support Obama and the Whites who will never support a Black candidate.
Posted by: chas0x01 | May 10, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
The DNC “rules” state that the nominee must have 2025 PLEDGED delegates to secure the nomination. Those superdelegates are nice to have, but their vote does not count for certain until they reach the convention floor and give their vote. Obama has invented new Obamamath for delegates! Maybe Obama should just declare himself president on May 20th and spare the nation all the bother of a general election.
Posted by: calli | May 10, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
You want to know why superdelegates are trickling but not stampeding to Obama’s side?
Hmmmmm……
March 4th Supers Clinton 247 Obama 199,
Today Clinton 270 Obama 274 or there about.
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
WV and KY are CLINTON COUNTRY !!!!!!!!
Posted by: keith1212 | May 10, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
30 points? I think it’s going to be a lot worse than that. Look at similar counties in the neighboring states. It could be 40 or even 50 points. Poblano, by the way, is offering similarly apocalyptic numbers. Of course Huckabee shellacked McCain in a couple states after he became the all but presumptive nominee. So it probably won’t matter all that much given that the press has already pronounced the Clinton campaign dead. It’ll be an embarrassment, but it won’t be a big deal.
Posted by: JeffT | May 10, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Thank you for the clarification of presumptive nominee. According to recent Ramussen polling, Clinton has a very wide lead Kentucky. It’s still a competitive race. Of course, it would be in the interest of the Obama campaign for her to step down. But it wouldn’t be in the national interest. Hopefully, it gets played out to Puerto Rico where the Latino vote would be influenced towards Clinton. Contrary to McGovern, Dean et al, every vote should count, particularly in such a tight race.
Posted by: katrina | May 10, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Danielczyk was one of Clinton’s “bundlers,” or fund-raisers who rack up contributions from other donors, and is being investigated to see whether he violated election law by repaying contributors, according to a Saturday article in The Wall Street Journal.
FOX News
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
For Hillary to say that she is going after the White blue collar worker vote and the older White American vote is rather insulting to these peoples’ intelligence. She does not give these American citizens credit for growing beyond the Civil War, but seems to be trying to carry them back to old and ignorant thinking. It is as if she is saying, if I can’t win this race, nobody is going to win, and that is sad. It does not play well for the country she says she loves or the party she says she is devoted to. Shame on you Hillary, we liked you much better when you and Bill weren’t playing divisive games. Many years ago, Governor George Wallace, who used to be a liberal, did the same thing after being beat out of an election by a right wing racist. He said it would never happen again, and he stopped being a liberal candidate, and won future elections. But we are in the 21st Century and those days are long gone for the United States of America.
Posted by: Diane | May 10, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Obama at the end of this race will not have enough Pd so he won’t br the winner either.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
To Mary E.
If you believe what you say, I think you should ask the schools where you got your 3 degrees for your money back!
Posted by: Borderline1000 | May 10, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Isn’t it perverse the people (BILL and HILLARY), who have made NAFTA and the MONOPOLIZATION of the press possible, are now claiming to be the champions for the WORKING CLASS. This is STALIN STYLE perversion of the history.
Wake up people and don’t fall into their trap. They are not trustworthy.
Posted by: Mike, NY | May 10, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Obama can not win enough pledged del.he caan not win and he knows it Hillary can’t win either. and the count is going to be a hair apart and she will have mor pop votes so she is not getting out
AND DO NOT CHANGE TO INDEPENDENT IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED YET SOME PRIMARY’S ARE CLOSED IN UP COMING STATES.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
NAFTA SIGNED INTO LAW IN DEC 1992 BY BUSH SR. CHANGED BY CLINTON AND SIGNED INTO LAW1994 IF THIS ADMI.HAD ENFORCED THE LAWS WE WOULD NOT HAVE THE PROBLEMS WE HAVE
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Breaking News
We have 57 states! Source: Barack Hussein Obama
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
yes…
the democratic party insiders like clyburn and rockerfeller and dean and pelosi…
none whom have ever run a national race once…
and kennedy and kerry and others who have and lost big time..
are going to have this brilliant woman who won indiana, ohio and pa and texas and california and ny and nj
and tenn and new mexico take a seat in the back of the racist bus of america
Posted by: appalachia blue | May 10, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
I think you Clinton supporters are in a meltdown now. You guys have some seriuos problems to address, and certainly are not making a convincing argument let a lone sense.
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
hmmmm sounds an awful like lot McCain losing Kansas after he was the presumptive nominee and garnering only 24% of the vote…but let’s not let facts get in the way
Posted by: Rich, Orlando | May 10, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
I can’t believe Obama said he’s been to 57 states… Very sad.
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I am an Obama supporter and I say WV don’t matter,you have to allow for the racism in this world and learn to work around it. It will make Hillary and her supporters feel good beccause they FEED on HATE AND RACISM
OBAMA 08!
Posted by: merle7 | May 10, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Let the people be heard; let the votes of people be counted.
The communist party led by Pelosi, Dean, Kennedy, Carter, Joe Andrew …sucks.
America need a new party.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 10, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
I hope the prognosticators are right. Maybe Obama will get a preview of November (if he is the nominee).
Posted by: Rhys | May 10, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Sad it’s very sad, that some people can not look any further, than rather the colour of the skin, even if this person is your best chance against mr. MC Cain.
Who already said he wil continue the war in Irak for many years by now.
But go ahead, this war wil only cost you billions of dollars each day ( wich is very good for the economy..yeah right )and the lives of your beloved ones who proudly serve in Irak.
C’mon bring the troops back home it’s time for a real change!
God bless America and Holland.
Posted by: Dennis from Holland | May 10, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
The figures for the Obama loss in West Virginia will mirror what his loss would be in a national election.
Since the failure of the Carter administration’s liberal policies, Americans have voted for a moderate or a conservative, without exception.
The silent majority has chosen to ignore primaries and caucuses along with the political genocide of the Democrat party by the Obama guard.
That same majority will reject any attempt to move the country to radically liberal, left-wing positions in domestic or foreign affairs.
As in the past 40 years, moderates will elect the next President.
Posted by: Jayhawk | May 10, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Dennis, thank you for reinforcing my previous assertion that almost any criticism of Obama is seen as racist. Blackness is the “New Teflon”; we are “not allowed” to criticize Obama without being called a racist. Dennis, did you ever stop to think MAYBE some of us dislike Obama’s political views, regardless of his skin color? My wife and I supported him at the beginning of the year… until we learned more about him. It is people like you who are making this election about race.
Posted by: Rhys | May 10, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Yavoj Lem,
Thank you for your explanation on Super Delegates. An endorsement does not equal a vote. They are free to change their minds for any reason or no reason at all.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 10, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Pretty simple those who vote for Clinton Tuesday will vote for Mccain in Nov.
Posted by: Tina D | May 10, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
I see many Obama supporters make comments to mock Hillary and her supporters. This is really unbelievably foolish!!! First, I want to clarify that blue collar workers support Hillary because they like her down-to-earth style, her specific solutions to those problems that Americans are facing and her tenacity and strength that are exactly required in presidency. However, so many Obama supporters very disrespectfully mocked it, saying that only less educated support Hillary because they are stupid. These kinds of comments are very low-class and make me start wonder about Obama’s integrity. If such low-class disrespectful people support Obama, how can trust their judgment in choosing a candidate? Also, please be aware that there are also many well-educated people who support Hillary, including me. I am currently doing my second Master’s degree. I support Hillary wholeheartedly because she’s the best candidate among the three and I have followed her for many years and watched her working hard for the country. This country can’t afford any more mess. We must think hard before we choose candidate. More words to the black people: Please stop voting for your race, but for record and qualifications.
Posted by: Candy | May 10, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Seems there are two faces of tomdavie….
Which is the true one???
Posted by: True Truth | May 10, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“I am a patriotic citizen of the US-all 57 of them.” Now there’s a leader for ya.
Ahhhhh…..but I see…..the four year political puppy is tired. Give ‘em a break….and another break and another and another and another and another…..
Yep….this man’s prepared on day one. Sickening.
Posted by: catherine in NM | May 10, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Trouble with the popular vote is that the many of the caucus states do not record the votes.
So I guess we can just leave those votes I suspose.
Then again Obama wasn’t even on the ballot in MI so his sum gain there was zero votes.
There is no way Hillarys math could work, or will work
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Uncommitted Democratic superdelegates in Congress overwhelmingly say they won’t necessarily back the presidential candidate who wins the most primary delegates. Instead, electability will be very important in their
decision.
Of 42 lawmakers interviewed by The Hill, only four said they regarded the primary vote as decisive.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Why is the media and her supporters treating her like she’s still a viable candidate in this race? There is no way for her to win. He has the most delegates, is now even with super delegates, has the most states and the most popular vote. He’s the one who brought millions of new voters in to the process. She made an early agreement not to count Florida and Michigan and now she’s reneging. This race is soooo over. Everyone acts like the queen deserves a consolation prize. She’s not the first candidate ever to lose a nomination. She’s such a “bitter” sore loser. It’s proof that she in it for herself.
Posted by: DC from NJ | May 10, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Uncommitted Democratic superdelegates in Congress overwhelmingly say they won’t necessarily back the presidential candidate who wins the most primary delegates. Instead, electability will be very important in their
decision.
Of 42 lawmakers interviewed by The Hill, only four said they regarded the primary vote as decisive.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Get over both Candidates new the rules, and delegate allocation. Hillary used the big state philosophy and is now loosing. Period. The irony is that she is now saying that Obama doesn’t care about the little states, and she needs them.
This is not a Republican contest, it is a Democratic contest. The demcrate rules apply.
She picked her approach, Obama his.
She is loosing, he is winning.
That is it.
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
At the end of the race there will still be no winner and Obama knows that axelrod knows that and guess what Hillary knows that an every state has extra elected del. for going last from here some like six to a district
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
@brianerickson65
Please don’t tell me you send this preacher money.
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Since Rev Wright has exposed Obama, Obama can not possibly win the white working class vote. In addition Obama can not win the Catholic vote and Hispanic vote and senior vote.
Obama can not possibly win the general election in Nov.
Obama is like George McGovern who also only had the african-american votes and college 19 year old kids.
By the way McGovern lost 49 out of 50 states….Obama will also lose big time in Nov….period.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
No, Barack is like a football team that has a 10 point lead with 1 and 1/2 minutes to go. Stuff can happen. The media can keep trying to blow the whistle early all they want, the referees will set the clock back. If Obama is so dang good, why will he get the stuffing beat out of him in places like West Virginia? Dems are toast with Obama as candidate, Hillary in four years. You’ve been hearing that from me for months.
========================================
Obama and bittergate, we shall not forget!
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 10, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
tww,
If you took what was Dean’s constituents and supporters and you added in the AA, I think you get the Obamaphiles. Dean went around ignoring and insulting working class whites also. Do you recall the big flap over the confederate flags and how irate white southerners were?? Dean did not care and was reluctant to apologize. Perhaps someone can recall his precise gaffe. I do recall that his supporters were young and not just professional, but termed “starbuck ghettos” or some such thing.
So, Obama is an extension of Dean with the AA twist. Now I want to hear Obama scream. LOL
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 10, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
The up coming states do count and the media knows that she can still win why did kennedy have 700 less than carter and he went to the floor tell Obama that acting at bush is pushing many voters away from him and the DNC for life
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
i saw some people switched battle lines just in a day or two…
Too bad, you just gave up what you have believed in for so long just based on nothing….
Obama has not getting better since day one, he constitently won his pattern since day one, he is getting worse actually after all his issue came out…
Hillary has not changed since day one and she won her states consitently, and she is actually getting stronger… She has every right to complete race it is supposed to….
The delegate math has been an uphill battle since March and there is nothing new happened….
So what made people change their minds? Is that for the sake of Dems’ party? If so, forget about Dems’ party, there is no value left in this Dems party…
You are electing President of United States not the chair of DNC….
You should care about what is the best to this country… What made you changed your belief you have had for long who is the best to be qualified as President….
People need to think hard and vote by your heart not by number!!!
Posted by: True Truth | May 10, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Of course Obama is going to lose WV and KY as they’re filled with bigot in the tradition of Pat Buchanan. But the fact of the matter is that Obama can easily win the presidency without those two states.
Posted by: Jeff | May 10, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Read the page before you turn it
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
You Clinton supporters out there. Your hurting yes, but your hurt and hating isnt gonna change the fact that Obama will be the next President. Get on the train.
You doubted that he could beat Hillary, you laughed at him. Well he’s beaten Hillary and guess what, he’s gonna schlack McSame no matter how much you and O’Reilly try to smear him with guilt by association tactics.
Posted by: Sean | May 10, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
I hate to burst the popular vote bubble, BUT the popular vote is not the metric by which this race will be chosen. It will be pledged delegates. If neither one has the necessary pledged delegates then the supers get to decide it and yes, they really could go either way—this thing is not over.
The popular vote cannot be taken into consideration because it is not an accurate reflection of the actual popular vote. The caucus states don’t submit a popular vote.
I think Florida should count as is, as both were on the ballot. As for Michigan, that one isn’t going to fly. It is grossly unfair to Obama no matter what side you are on, you must see that it is not fair, it just is not.
The gist of it is, the popular vote is not and will not be the deciding factor to anyone or anything other than the Hillary supporters who seem blind to fair play at this point.
Hillary screwed up in her strategy. She thought she was going to win in a landslide and so ignored the caucus states. Her bad. And, oh yeah, she won’t be back in four years. The Dems eat their losers, look at history—sorry.
Posted by: Bobbi | May 10, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Look he has to be President of all fifty states and at this point if he was Really JFK he could go into any state and win
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
SEAN we are not getting on the train Obama ain’t even getting on the train.
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Sean,
The game is not over yet, isn’t it? Obama is leading by Dems’ rule…
Obama won 10 black states and 6 red states from primaries, 13 caucuses…
Hillary won 17 states from primaries and 1 caucus.
Obama lose to majority of white votes, women votes, latino votes, and other minority votes…
May be in the end, Obama will be nominee by Dems’ rule.. Unfortunately, the General election rule is not set by Dems and Dems will loose without Clinton’s base…
By the way, there is no value left in this Obama hijacked Dems party…
Posted by: True Truth | May 10, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Sean,
Obama is NOWHERE in the GE, if he is the nominee, without Hillary’s supporters. But note, we do not have to get on the train. If he becomes the POTUS, it will not be with my help or blessing.
If he won fair and square and if the DNC had not been so biased, I may have felt differently. I refuse to be part of this sandbagging of Hillary AND Bill Clinton.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 10, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
As a Hillary Clinton supporter we understand the leadership in the DNC is pushing this puppet.
After the November elections the DNC will have to rise from the ashes to rebuild for 2012 with new leadership with Dean, Pelosi, Brazille and company kicked to the curb after the McGovern like loss. You know the 49 states losing strategy.
Posted by: toby | May 10, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Even as he already limps to the Fall, the Democratic Party beats up himself, saying it only makes him stronger to know his weaknesses going into the general elections; but, he forgets that he is doing it also in the presence of the Republican Party, the foe, who is all too eager to learn how to fight and defeat him and is doing all in his power to keep the spectacle going. Masochism is good for the soul; and, if you ask me, I would say he is looking forward to the day after, when he would be looking back and wondering why he lost. Déjà vu.
Posted by: TK | May 10, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Obama crowning himself as the nominee is getting way ahead of himself. He has been getting less and less support by the middle class white vote, in fact he has been losing by larger margins in most categories. The only place he has held strong is with the AA population. Considering that the AA population is only 11%, this should be a huge concern to the Democratic Party and the superdelegates. This is just another show of arrogance, by an arrogant man. MSM needs to shut up and let this play out, otherwise the Democrats are going to lose in November, and not by just a small amount.
Posted by: beachnan | May 10, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
The fact:
Hillary can’t win the nomination, Obama will lose in November.
Don’t Democrats make a laughing stock of themselves almost every four years!!
Posted by: Jkan | May 10, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
John Pen
If most of Hillary’s supporters won’t vote for Obama–then most Hillary supporters are stupid, cuz I bet you Hillary will vote for Obama. I bet Bill Clinton will vote for Obama. I bet Chelsea Clinton will vote for Obama. They aren’t going to take a chance on McCain getting elected hoping she can run again in 4 years. A lot can happen in 4 years.
I am going to assume the Clinton’s love this country and I am going to assume they are loyal democrats. They do not want another term of Bush policy—listen to her she says it every time she opens her mouth. She means it, really.
Obviously you don’t trust their judgment.
Posted by: Bobbi | May 10, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Why isn’t Obama in W Virgina, I guess that the less than elite crowd does not sit well with him. How does he think he can be president for all the people when even in the primary he think he’s above many of us? There is something that just does not add up about Obama, but then again many in America don’t want substance, they want a quick fix, a handsome man who is good with the words.I ask where is the substance? Is saying CHANCE- substance??
Posted by: dan | May 10, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
We should probably talk about Dean’s stupid 50 state strategy. If he ran this nominating process like the Republicans-Hillary would have won it already. No, we have to say that the votes in Utah, have as much value as Pennsylvania, and we all know how many times the Democrats have won Utah in the general election-0, zilch, nada. We also, according to Dean, have to give weighted numbers to the AA community in urban areas. Why does their vote count more than mine. We also know the cheating that has gone on in the caucuses by the Obama surrogates. He has already stolen more delegates than he should have. Say goodbye to the party and Dean’s unwinnable strategy.
Posted by: beachnan | May 10, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
maybe they used Obama
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
I think Tomdavie is BI POLAR.. He must have some mental illness, or perhaps he’s taking some medication that clouds his reasoning.. If I am not mistaken, he used to post a lot of pro Hillary messages on here. I am not sure what happened. Again, maybe he’s not quite all right.
Posted by: Lookup | May 10, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
J, WV is, for the most part, quite bigoted. I should know, since I grew up there. But Sen. Obama has a chance there, in Nov., because the unions will be behind him. They’re already against Sen. McCain.
Posted by: for Pete's sake | May 10, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
The election is based on all 50 states, not just the ones that Hillary has won or will win, I don’t care how big or small they are. Obama has had a 50-state strategy from the beginning with an army of volunteers working for him. He has won against the formidable Clinton machine which thought it would have the nomination wrapped up by Super Tuesday. Pretty impressive to me. The small guy winning against the big guy. He has followed the rules. That’s the kind of President I want. One who follows the rules and doesn’t think the rules don’t apply to them. Sounds a lot like more of Bush to me.
Posted by: Cindy | May 10, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Again, tomdavie is a perfect example of why Obama will never win. You offend all those people whose vote you will need. Utah, and all the other red states, are not going to be voting for Obama. You must grow up and face reality. People are not voting for Obama because of his race, it is because he is too inexperienced, lacks a strong resume, has failed to have a significant legislative record to back him, has unsavory associates, and fails to resonate with many groups. So keep it up, and good luck to you. You will need it.
Posted by: beachnan | May 10, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Hillary agreed to the rules of this primary. Too bad she didn’t read them first.
Mark Penn thought the primary states were winner take all so they didn’t need to compete in the caucus states. As I have said before, her bad. She made a strategic error. If you make a mistake and lose the game, you don’t get to go back, rewrite the rules to favor yourself and play it over.
Also, regardless of whether Utah or Idaho or any other state has voted democrat any time in recent history in the general election is irrelevant, democrats live in those states and should have a say in who represents them in the party. I am very tired of states being told they don’t count unless they meet some metric that the Clinton’s and her supporters don’t like.
And oh yeah, I just have to say this to all the gun totin’ democrat red necks out there. Hillary voted to have your guns taken away in a federal emergency. Obama voted against it. So let me ask, do you really believe she is a protector of the second amendment? Go look at her voting record.
Posted by: bobbi | May 10, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
not 30 make it 40.
MSM promoted Bush during 2000 and we know what we got. I am from India and I have never seen such a worst media in the whole world.
Posted by: Tony | May 10, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
If I was the Clinton’s I would really investigate voter fraud in the caucuses, NC, Gary Indiana,etc. Then I would sue Barack Obama and the DNC to hell and back.
\
OBAMA THE FRAUD
DECEIVER, DIVIDER
Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | May 10, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
The small guy winning against the big guy. He has followed the rules. That’s the kind of President I want.
Posted by: Cindy
FIRST OF ALL OBAMA IS NOT THE SMALL GUY….HE IS BACKED THE DEMOCRATE POWER MACHINE INCLUDING TED KENNEDY, DEAN, PELOSI AND KERRY. PLUS OBAMA HAS RECEIVED OVER $200 MILLION IN CAMPAIGN MONEY….THAT MONEY AIN’T COMING FROM $25 COLLEGE KID OR AFRICAN -AMERICAN DONATIONS.
YOU FIGURE OUT WHERE ALL THIS RECORD BREAKING MONEY IS COMING FROM, BUT MANY OF HIS ANTI-AMERICAN AND ANTI-WHITE FRIENDS HAVE ACCESS TO BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
The vicious tone of the comments is mind-boggling. Just think logically: Clinton may win big in W.Va, but she needs super big wins in all remaining six states and territories. She is 165 pledged delegates short. There are altogether 217 delegates left and she need to win 76% of them. This is not likely to happen. She may shorten Obama’s lead by twenty, maybe. Even if she got the 110 she is fighting for from MI and FL (which is not likely) she still would be behind Obama. To nominate her when Obama leads means to alienate the Black population. Her own husband never won the majority of the White vote, but he did win the majority of the Black vote and the majority of Latino: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_1992. And if the nomination is stolen from Obama (à la Bush 2000) the Black may sit out in November.
Posted by: alindra | May 10, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Puerto Rico being a “winner-take-all”
Hillary will take all 55 pledged delegates.
God Obama knows about this rule and that is why he wants to declare victory in Oregon before this knock out punch.
Just wait and see our Terminator, become the nominee and become the president
Posted by: Tony | May 10, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
John Pen,
I agree with you.. I LOL when I read that Obama has been getting all these “small” donations from the common folks .. haha
Posted by: Lookup | May 10, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
the Black may sit out in November.
Posted by: alindra
Let the black sit out in November.. I am tired of hearing and reading about the black and what the black will do! How come no one is talking about the Latinos?!? Sorry, ALINDRA, but the Latinos are the largest minority in this country!
Posted by: Lookup | May 10, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Yeah and we will do it again if Obama wins. I thought we Americans got a bit smarter after Bush II. I guess not.
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
MOST HILLARY SUPPORTERS WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA….. AND WILL INSTEAD VOTE FOR MCCAIN.
THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE FACT.
IF THE DEMS ARE SMART THEY WILL SELECT HILLARY AS THE NOMINEE….OR THEY CAN LOSE ANOTHER ELECTION IN NOV.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
FIRST OF ALL OBAMA IS NOT THE SMALL GUY….HE IS BACKED THE DEMOCRATE POWER MACHINE INCLUDING TED KENNEDY, DEAN, PELOSI AND KERRY. PLUS OBAMA HAS RECEIVED OVER $200 MILLION IN CAMPAIGN MONEY….THAT MONEY AIN’T COMING FROM $25 COLLEGE KID OR AFRICAN -AMERICAN DONATIONS.
YOU FIGURE OUT WHERE ALL THIS RECORD BREAKING MONEY IS COMING FROM, BUT MANY OF HIS ANTI-AMERICAN AND ANTI-WHITE FRIENDS HAVE ACCESS TO BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Tony,
You must be Mark Penn, cuz Puerto Rico is most definitely NOT winner take all. It is proportional, as all of the states have been.
Hillary will very likely win by a wide margin but will not get all 55 delegates.
Do your homework.
Posted by: Bobbi | May 10, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
He’d lose by less than 10 points.
Posted by: John Rawlings | May 10, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
John Pen-
The money is coming from small donors. There are a lot of us and we donate automatically every week until it adds up to $2300, as per the rules. Obama has a huge following and has received 1,500,000 donations. Hello, that’s a lot of dough when you multiply it by the average $40 donation. Thats the equivalent of a pizza, anyone can afford that.
Obama has to submit a list of all donors, as does Hillary, to prove where the money is coming from.
You can lie as much as you want, but only the people who already agree with you will buy into it.
Don’ you have any valid arguments about why Hillary is the better candidate. You have to resort to insults and flat out lying.
Posted by: Bobbi | May 10, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
To tomdavie
HEY Hillary has NOT lost and your boy is going NOWHERE!
I have heard it all that you kool-Aid drinkers have said. If Hillary supporters do not vote for Obama then they are RACIST,STUPID,OUT OF TOUCH,ETC.
WELL Guess what WE WILL NEVER GET ON BOARD WITH OBAMA. ANYONE is better than that EMPTY SUIT.CHANGE,CHANGE just like Bush promised. EMPTY promises. NOT even the MEDIA and the DNC can fool all the people, just the Kool-Aid Drinkers.
Posted by: Steve Moore | May 10, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Bobbi,
Can Obama release all the donor names. I bet most of them are muslims
Posted by: tim | May 10, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
First, he was always supposed to lose West Virginia and lose by a substantial margin. Second, consider these numbers:
Idaho: Obama 79 Clinton 17
Nebraska: Obama 68 Clinton 32
Washington: Obama 68 Clinton 31
Hawaii Obama 76 Clinton 24
Kansas Obama 74 Clinton 26
Minnesota Obama 67 Clinton 32
No candidate can win every state, and all candidates take a shellacking at some point, even the eventual nominee.
Posted by: jayhawkdem
OK, but consider:
Idaho was a caucus state
Clinton – 3,665
Obama – 16,880
EC – 4
Nebraska was a caucus state
Clinton – 12,445
Obama – 26,126
EC – 5
Washington was a caucus state
Clinton – 9,992
Obama – 21,629
EC – 11
Hawaii was a caucus state
Clinton – 8,835
Obama – 28,347
EC – 4
Kansas was a caucus state
Clinton – 9,462
Obama – 27,172
EC – 6
Minnesota was a caucus state
Clinton – 68,350
Obama – 141,451
EC – 10
Total Obama EC = 40
Compare with:
Florida was a CLOSED PRIMARY state
Clinton – 857,208
Obama – 569,041
EC – 27
Michigan was a PRIMARY state (I don’t know if it was CLOSED, OPEN, OR SEMI-OPEN)
Clinton – 328,151
Obama – ?
EC – 17
Total Clinton EC = 44
If you look at the breakdown, a few things should be quite obvious
1.) Obama does better in Caucus states. I wonder why? Maybe intimidation?
2.) Clinton does better in Primary states. Based on experience?
3.) Caucuses don’t reflect what the General Election vote will be. Frequently, the vote is not even reported, yet PLEDGED AND UNPLEDGED delegates are assigned? How is this done?
4.) The Electoral College value of some very large, but lightly-populated states is relatively small.
5.) The Electoral College value of some medium and large, densly-populated state is quite large.
6.) A savvy candidate can do more with two states (EC=44) than another candidate can do with six states (EC=40)
7.) Hillary needs to have the Florida/Michigan situation resolved on an “as is” basis. Obama thinks he doesn’t need them, so he is waiting out the clock, or so he thinks.
8.) I he doesn’t challenge Hillary in WV and KY, she not only increases her popular vote count, but she also picks up 15 EC votes. I know that EC votes do not count in the Primary, but I also know that the “Super Delegates” are going to really consider them if they have to vote in Denver, as they indicate the STRENGTH of a candidate with regard to winning the General Election, where it is winner take all, based on the Popular Vote in each state.
9.) Only 270 Electoral Votes are needed to win the General Election, a point not lost on George W. Bush.
So, is Obama going to be the whupee in WV and KY, and possibly more contests? I certainly hope so.
Please excuse the formatting, but it is such a pain to make everything look purdy, especially when it is obvious that few, if any will read one of my posts.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 10, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
The SD’s will nominate Mr. Obama. They will not risk angering the party elite. If she had the resources, Mrs. Clinton might capture enough of the low income and older vote to compete as an Independent in the GE. She and Ron Paul would make an interesting team.
Posted by: texasdemocrat | May 10, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
I wonder if MSNBC will have any coverage of Tuesdays W.V. Primary.
Posted by: Tina D | May 10, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Obama isn’t even campaigning in the state. He’s off partying with Larry Sinclair and the boyz.
Posted by: Alison | May 10, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Tim,
Yes, he has to release the names of any donor when the donation is $200 or more. As does Hillary. Donations that are smaller are not listed by name, until they reach that amount ($200). So basically he could provide a list, he just is not required to do so. I am sure he would if you ask him real nice though.
So maybe you are right, the evil Muslims are hoarding their pennies and sending them in slowly, to aid their brother to take over the WORLD…hehehehehe
Posted by: Bobbie | May 10, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Tina D,
I doubt it, that would favor Clinton
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
On msnbc the talking head said Obama can pick a woman and that will bring them back in line that is why we have to get this settled and come together here is a word I have not used since 1969 GF Ican’t burn my bra again they cost to much but I can protest by not voting for Obama women are sixty % of the dem party and I am not talking newbies you never know if young kids are going to vote .
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
NEW SOUTH
Across the South, Barack Obama’s smashing primary victory in North Carolina last week reflects a new reality — a half-century of rising Republican red tide has crested, with signs of receding.
NY Times
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Just think logically: Clinton may win big in W.Va, but she needs super big wins in all remaining six states and territories. She is 165 pledged delegates short. There are altogether 217 delegates left and she need to win 76% of them.
Alindra
========================================
Sorry, alindra, but Hillary is only 78 PLEDGED delegates behind. You are making the same mistake as the rest of the Obama supporters here; you are counting ‘Super Delegates” as PLEDGED. N.B.(Nota bene), “Super Delegates” do not come into play until there is a DEADLOCKED CONVENTION and they are supposed to all be UNPLEDGED and to not be involved at this time.
What is happening is a great effort to manipulate one or another candidate into an untenable position, by convincing their backers and supporters that that candidate cannot possibly win, because the other has all the marbles (delegates). Again, n.b., that is not the way this game is played, and Hillary knows what she is doing.
You can think as logically as you want, but it would help to get your facts straight first. In addition, the key issue for “Super Delegates” is, “Which of these candidates can BEST bring about a victory for the Democratic Party in the General Election. Believe me, if it comes to a DEADLOCKED convention, the “Super Delegates” are not going to be TOTALLY concerned with who has the most marbles. Their responsibility is to the party, not to the candidate who jumps up and down and says, “Hey, look, I’ve got all the marbles, I won, I won.”
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 10, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Oops! Make that 4 supers today for Obaman one previously for Clinton.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
What Clinton people? What? You really want Monica back in the oval office? I think having Larry Sinclair there would be a refreshing and welcome change, in this a Change election. I guarantee Larry’s antics will keep the lobbyists out of the white house! Back off pundits! (brushing off the shoulders)
Posted by: Alison | May 10, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
“THAT WOULD BE INTERESTING TO SEE OBAMA’S MONEY DONORS NAMES AND SEE WHO THEY REALLY ARE.”
He’s got about 1.5 million of em, so it’ll be a long list…
and I get what you’re inferring, but since his average donor size is under $100, we’re not exactly talking about a billionaires club here.
You guys who want to see “the list” are just revealing your age and how old school your politics are. With Obama, and a lot of new politicians, gone are the days of wrangling over who gets which couple thousand millionaires in whose camp.
It’s part of that whole series of tubes called the interwebs. You should read up about it. I’m sure theres info in the card catalog at your local public library.
Posted by: fontapa | May 10, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
THIS RACE IS FAR FROM OVER.
NEITHER OBAMA OR HILLARY CAN GET TO THE 2,025 DELEGATES NEEDED…THEREFORE THE SUPERDELEGATES WILL DECIDE WHO IS THE BEST CANDIDATED TO BEAT MCCAIN…PERIOD.
THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS IS WHO CAN BEAT MCCAIN….AND HILLARY BY WINNING ALL THE BIG STATES WITH THE MOST ELECTORAL VOTES, AND HILLARY WON ALL THE SWING STATES THAT DECIDE THE ELECTION…MAKES HILLARY THE OBVIOUS CHOICE TO BEAT MCCAIN….PERIOD.
THE SUPERDELEGATES REALIZE THIS AND WANT TO BEAT MCCAIN, AND PUT A DEMOCRATE IN THE WHITE HOUSE FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS….THEY WILL REALIZE HILLARY IS THE CANDIDATE THEY NEED TO SELECT TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN…PERIOD.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Oh Did I forget to mention that they are Pansies too.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Well who contributed to the Clinton library and why are they refusing to release that info. What’s the big deal unless they are hiding something.
Posted by: d | May 10, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
since his average donor size is under $100, we’re not exactly talking about a billionaires club here.
Posted by: fontapa
YOU ARE REALLY NAIVE.
IT CERTAINLY IS KNOWN THAT OBAMA HAS MANY ANTI-AMERICAN AND ANTI-WHITE FRIENDS THAT HAVE ACCESS TO BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
THESE PEOPLE ARE EXPERTS AT A HIDING THE MONEY TRAIL AND KNOW HAVE TO MANIPULATE THE GAME TO GET MONEY FILTERED WERE THEY WANT IT.
OBAMA RECEIVED OVER $200 MILLION IN DONATIONS…DO YOU REALLY THINK IT WAS FROM $100 DONATIONS FROM COLLEGE KIDS……PLEASE THINK!
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
John Pen, if this is a known fact of where Obama is getting his donations, could you please provide me with the links. I’d love to read about it for myself. Thanks
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Yavo Lem,
You’re exactly right, nobody is going to read your long boring posts, with a bunch of trumped up numbers that favor Hillary.
In case you and the rest of your little friends here haven’t heard:
EVERY MAJOR NETWORK, NEWS ORGANIZATION AND NEWSPAPER SAYS IT IS OVER!
Get a clue, can you spell LOSER? Just in case you can’t it goes like this H-I-L-L-A-R-Y!!! Get it now????
tomdavie
========================================
And every newspaper got the Truman/Dewey contest right, too? And because it was a radio play, everyone thought we really were being invaded by Martians some time ago (War of the World, by H. G. Wells). Everyone knew back then that the radio stations always broadcasted NEWS that was true.
Sir, and here I am being charitable, my numbers are not “trumped up”. Per contra, I work through them very carefully and think about what they mean, as I am neither a mathematician, nor a statistician, or even an accountant. I analyze the numbers and let them “speak” to me.
And if you really want to know, I am a Registered Independent and not a Democrat. In the beginning, I did not believe I could support Hillary, but as I followed the campaign and combed the Web I found a lot of information that ruled out Senator Obama. I also listened to him speak on the debates and heard his snide remarks and watched his very revealing body language. I saw how he treated Hillary, and I saw where he plagerized ideas from her campaign site. If you don’t believe me, compare his proposals for addressing the Louisiana problems, which are almost verbatim from Senator Clinton’s, which, incidently, were posted nearly 3 months prior to his.
So, I thought it through, weighed the character and thoughts and debate performances, and made, what for me was a very serious decision, specifically, to support Senator Clinton both financially and in other ways. I can no longer send her contributions, so I am trying to help by educating some benighted people. Are you going to be one of my successes, or will you keep your head (I was going to say something else) in the sand? Not that it really matters.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 10, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
IT CERTAINLY IS KNOWN THAT OBAMA HAS MANY ANTI-AMERICAN AND ANTI-WHITE FRIENDS THAT HAVE ACCESS TO BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
**************************************
I can’t stop Laughing can hardly type this>
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
if this is a known fact of where Obama is getting his donations, could you please provide me with the links. I’d love to read about it for myself. Thanks
Posted by: lisa
OBAMA HAS NOT RELEASED THE LIST OF THESE MONEY DONORS, HE IS NOT REQUIRED TO.
SO NO ONE KNOWS FOR SURE WHERE ALL THESE RECORD BREAKING DONATIONS TOTALING OVER $200 MILLION, AND IT KEEPS COMING.
BUT DO YOU REALLY THINK THE $200 MILLION IS COMING FROM COLLEGE KIDS GIVING THEIR LAST $50?
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
tomdavie,
Real adult attitude. Typical Obama nonsense.
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Oops can’t trust Obama it seems he just added a 5th Super today. I type these things up and he goes and changes them, just like that.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Then John Pen it is only speculation on your part on where the money is coming from.
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
lisa,
to name a few, google halem el-hady..he was a fundraiser for a charity an islamic charity, kindhearts, that was closed down by the feds in 2006, for giving money to eg., hamas and al-quada. he is now a fundraiser for bho, and was on his official web site.
also look at evenas, from code pink, an anti-military group, that has bundled money for bho.
Posted by: disgusted | May 10, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
@ John Pen.
Avg donation to the Obama campaign is $109, 1.5 million people had donated as of May 6th, 2008. That’s why Hillary, in her speech after the PA win, started asking for $5 donations, because it works! 100 superdelegates endorsed Clinton before the campaign even began. They didn’t endorse Edwards, or Biden, or Obama. It was her, the favored to win. She had the name recognition. That’s why she got 55% of the vote in Michigan when Obama, Edwards and all the other Democratic candidates took their names off the ballot, following the rules. Anyone who says Obama was/is somehow more powerful than the Clintons is delusional.
She would not win against McCain because she is not trusted. Even in Indiana, with her squeaker win, 45% of Democrats said they don’t trust her. She has not been vetted in this campaign. She thinks the Republicans won’t bring up her baggage. Yeah right! She has been courting the conservative media during this campaign, including former members of what she called the “right wing conspiracy”, hoping they won’t trash her if she becomes the nominee. Not going to happen. Vote for McCain if you want. If you do, you don’t really care about the Democratic party and should leave it anyways.
Posted by: Cindy | May 10, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
leelee07…wonder where wright has been. for someone so verbose, he sure shut up quickly. sound fishy to you?
Posted by: disgusted | May 10, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Obama supporters and African Americans need to stop believing the are the CHOSEN PEOPLE OF GOD. Senator Obama is just another politican who will say and do anything to get the nomination. He ceraintly is not god-like in any way. He is not a leader in any way but is very good at distorting facts about his campaign and his opponents. If his name is on the November ballot he will lose and he knows it well.
Posted by: Grammie | May 10, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
whether or not bho has a problem with white voters, it is clear the black vote is why he is ahead. 90% black vote gave him his numbers. if that vote was spli 40-60 or 60-40, like all the other demographics, clinton would lead.it is their blind adoration that has given him the position he is in.
Posted by: so obvious | May 10, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
@disgusted – Extremely fishy and really not credible. Either Obama has him duct-taped to a chair somewhere in a dark basement or the Very Wrong Reverend Wright is off on a cruise after being paid off by Obama for his “performance.”
However, what Manning said in the video might be enough to make Wright cast ashore and defend his uh, manhood. lol.
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 10, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
disgusted thanks, I did google these and found nothing but blogs. Honestly I don’t believe most things on the net. Anyone can post whatever they want. And if it were really true Hannity would be all over it.
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Obama not even bothering to show up in West Vitginia is this what I am reading….a no show here.
Also when I think like an american thinker i now connect the dots to why the superdelgates decide to vote for B.0. It’s all about the currency…real and percieved.
Superdelegates include a large number of elected officials (all Democratic governors and Congressmen and other Democratic Party mandarins) who need to run their own campaigns, now and in the future. All politicians loathe the grind they need to endure to fundraise: endless phone calls asking for money, parties and events they need to attend to generate support, names they need to recall, egos they need to soothe and massage.
How helpful it would be to have one source they can rely upon to avoid some of the the money grubbing they have to engage in to run a campaign?
They now have one: Barack Obama.
His website admits that it
“reserves the right to make personal information available to organizations with similar political viewpoints and objectives, in furtherance of its own political objectives”.
Clearly, Barack Obama intends to wield this power for his own political purposes. He can channel donations and, more importantly information (after all, we live in the Information Age) to other candidates to help them when they run for office. Even if Senator Obama fails to become President, he will become a power broker in the years to come. He owns a gold mine and will permit other candidates to dig for supporters and donors **. These candidates include the crucial few hundred superdelegates whose support he needs to become the Democratic nominee for President.
Are there any indications that Barack Obama — who prides himself on being above political gamesmanship — would engage in such a strategy?
Yes. He has been doing so under the radar screen for years. The Center for Responsive Politics — a non-partisan group — has “opened a fascinating window into the world of superdelegates” in the words of this ABC News report (which notes that Hillary has also used this tactic, but that Obama — perhaps because he has more money to play with — has been sending a much larger amount of money to superdelegates).
Since 2005, Barack Obama has donated three times as much as Senator Clinton to Democratic superdelagates. The study found that the presidential candidate who gave more money to superdelegates received the endorsements 82 percent of the time. As noted in the Weekly Standard,
“…if 82 percent of the superdelegates are endorsing the candidate who donated more to them, that’s indicative of something other than a belief in the “audacity of hope”. It sounds more like old-fashioned bribery”
It is a sad statement about the Democratic Party that a few hundred superdelegates may, in essence, be casting their lot for Barack Obama in order to bolster their own campaigns.
Posted by: LL Barra | May 10, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
John Penn- you are on the money! i am unsure why the media has let all the shady relationships and problems associated with bho go by the way side. i know the republicans will not let him cruise through the election like the dems have. it will be nasty…but well deserved.
Posted by: disgusted | May 10, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
THIS RACE IS FAR FROM OVER.
NEITHER OBAMA OR HILLARY CAN GET TO THE 2,025 DELEGATES NEEDED…THEREFORE THE SUPERDELEGATES WILL DECIDE WHO IS THE BEST CANDIDATED TO BEAT MCCAIN…PERIOD.
THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS IS WHO CAN BEAT MCCAIN….AND HILLARY BY WINNING ALL THE BIG STATES WITH THE MOST ELECTORAL VOTES, AND HILLARY WON ALL THE SWING STATES THAT DECIDE THE ELECTION…MAKES HILLARY THE OBVIOUS CHOICE TO BEAT MCCAIN….PERIOD.
THE SUPERDELEGATES REALIZE THIS AND WANT TO BEAT MCCAIN, AND PUT A DEMOCRATE IN THE WHITE HOUSE FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS….THEY WILL REALIZE HILLARY IS THE CANDIDATE THEY NEED TO SELECT TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN…PERIOD.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Obama has made it possible for Clinton to win. He has created 7 more states.
Posted by: smarter than a 5th grader | May 10, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Ok, let’s play the A game. These are donors to Hillary on that same site. SO WHAT. What’s in a name. Do you know these contributors. You are all racists for bringing these names up.
Abboud, Ghassan
Abdalla, Hisham
Abdalla, Mohammad
Abdalla, Nadia
Abdalla, Rabai
ABDALLA, SAMER
Abdalla, Seham
Abdalla, Suha
Abdallah, Iman
Abdallah, Khaled
Abdeen, Ziad
Abdelhady, Omar
Abdelhamid, Reema
Abdellatif, Ossama
Abdelmuti, Ashraf
Abdelnur, Susana
Abdelrasoul, Brenda
Abdenour, Paul
Abdesaken, Fataneh
Abdi, Abraham
Abdi, Mina
Abdi, Sara
ABDO, JAMES
ABDO, JOHN
Abdoulah, Colleen
Abdullah, Aslim
Abdullah, Bayan
Abdullah, Faisal
Abdullah, Suha
Abdullah, Waleed
Abdullatif, Mahmoud
Abdulsamad, Ogab
Abdunnabi, Daniel
Abedin, Sarah
Abegaz, Dawit
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
lisa, see the story from the front page, april 23, 2008.
Posted by: disgusted | May 10, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
There are over 470 remaining votes in the campaign, including pledged and supers.
470 is a bigger number than 161, right?
So there are enough votes left for Obama to win. Easily.
Posted by: fontapa
USING YOUR LOGIC WITH 470 REMAINDING VOTES LEFT TO DECIDE….HILLARY CERTAINLY CAN WIN…RIGHT?
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
I’ll take my bible and my “typical white woman” behind to the polls in November and vote McCain.
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
LOL Leelee, it’s like Hillary and Bosnia in sniper fire. But she kept repeating it though, 4 times. Come on, they are all exhausted and I feel bad for both campaigns. This has gone on so long. And Obama has 2 little girls that need their dad. I just hope this ends soon.
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Of course Obama is going to lose WV and KY as they’re filled with bigot in the tradition of Pat Buchanan. But the fact of the matter is that Obama can easily win the presidency without those two states.
Posted by: Jeff | May 10, 2008 7:48:31 PM
—————–
Hmm, Really??? It is insulting to call hard-working white Americans as BIGOT!
These Obama followers, your Messiah is supposed to be a uniter.
The true losers are our democracy and the people with decency!
Posted by: Jason | May 10, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Obama has 2 little girls that need their dad. I just hope this ends soon.
Posted by: lisa | May 10
OBAMA SHOULD GO HOME TO SOUTH CHICAGO WITH HIS FRIENDS REV. WRIGHT AND THE NEW REV OTIS AND AYERS AND REZKO, AND GO GET SOME REAL EXPERIENCE RUNNING CHICAGO….BEFORE HE THINKS HE CAN RUN AMERICA.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
what ever the outcome of this primary, the democratic party will not survive it. the vile words and rhetoric passing between the candidates supporters, and the media hype have truly pulled the party apart. it is no longer a contest for the best candidate, it is racial, it is “any-one but clinton”, it is a mess. there is no way people on either side of the debate will come together again as a party and mean it. i suppose i have always believed that the dems were the good guys and the repub bad. i naively thought that the best person won, that people played fair, and that there were principles and ideologies that were a given. this sounds corny, but i thought there were politicians that really were “the good guys”. this nomination process has really woken me up, and i have finally lost all the belief i had in the system and my party. after 36 years as a loyal democrat, i am fed up with the party, and its elder statesmen who have done such a poor job in getting us through this process. for the first time i will vote republican, and not feel like a traitor. i guess i finally realize that ideologies are not the only reason to vote for someone and the party is not everything. i will change my party to unaffiliated, and look towards a third party that is more pallatable.
Posted by: too sad | May 10, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Meanwhile, some of the Clintons’ most thoughtful counselors are trying to talk her down calmly — almost like a family intervention — to get her concede the Democratic presidential race when the appropriate time comes, in such a way as to heal some of the wounds to the party and to both candidates but allow her to make her best case for the vice presidency.
No one I have spoken to who knows her well doubts that, as she reconciles to the likelihood that her presidential campaign is falling short, she will aggressively, she will aggressively seek the vice presidential spot. One reason: Contrary to common belief, she doesn’t look forward to going back to the Senate. Many Democratic senators believe that she would not have an easy time winning an election for majority leader; the tenor and tactics of her presidential campaign have pushed away some Democrats.
CNN
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
2025 take away 1864 which is Obama’s votes so far…
That leaves 161 votes left for Obama to win.
There are over 470 remaining votes in the campaign, including pledged and supers.
470 is a bigger number than 161, right?
So there are enough votes left for Obama to win. Easily.
But you’re not getting paid to post the truth, are you?
fontapa
=========================================
fontapa,
Your math is based on the wrong PLEDGED DELEGATE count for Obama. Rather than 1864, it should be 1410, and Clinton’s is 1332 for a difference of 78. Don’t include “Super Delegates” in Obama’s base number, as they do not matter until there is a DEADLOCKED convention, and then they are UNPLEDGED, so that they can exercise their judgment as to which candidate is the best one to win the General Election FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. They are not, or should not be interested in a candidate at this point in time. Also, an endorsement, which should not be given, is not a vote and does not turn a “Super Delegate” into a PLEDGED DELEGATE. Got it? Good, now you may redo your math.
If you don’t believe my figures, check out the New York Times web site. Unfortunately, you’ve been sold a false biil of goods.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 10, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Lisa,
“And Obama has 2 little girls that need their dad. I just hope this ends soon.”
IF he becomes President he isn’t going to have time for them. That’s what happens when you get in the “Big Time”. He made the choice to run, he needs to deal with it.
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
John Pen, why would you pick my post about Omama’s girls to post to. I was only concerned about what the canidates must be going through. What’s up with your post to me.
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
@Lisa – Yeah, no doubt, both Obama and Hillary are both a little punchy from all the campaigning. However, it did add some needed humor to the day, so it wasn’t all bad. Let’s just hope everybody does the right thing so our long, national nightmare can soon be over, if not for us, then for the sake of the children. :D
A Proud, Black, Hillary Supporter
Rise, Hillary, Rise!’08
Posted by: LeeLee07 | May 10, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Of course Obama is going to lose WV and KY as they’re filled with bigot in the tradition of Pat Buchanan. But the fact of the matter is that Obama can easily win the presidency without those two states.
Posted by: Jeff | May 10, 2008
OBAMA COULD NOT WIN PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO,NEW JERSEY,INDIANA, FLORIDA, MICHIGAN, CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS EITHER.
HILLARY BEAT OBAMA IN ALL THOSE STATES…HILLARY WILL BE PRESIDENT.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
regarding counting the votes…i do not know what will transpire, however you guys need to remember that none of the delegates, super, or the ones won in the states are bound to vote as they are now assigned. they can change their votes if they want to. nothing regarding the delegates is written in stone.
Posted by: disgusted | May 10, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
The idea that Obama would not win in California, Illinois, New York, etc. is crazy. These states always go blue.
He will win those states. Period. That is one of the worst arguments I have yet heard.
Posted by: Bobbie | May 10, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Say hello to our 7 new states … Obama may be thinking of expanding the US of A. Hence the freudian slip 57 states.
51. Puerto Rico
52. Guam
53. Northern Mariana
54. American Samoa
55. St. Croix
56. St. Thomas
57. St. John
Posted by: LL Barra | May 10, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
john pen,
actually, bho did not win any of the states where the black vote was less than 30%. in that he always received 90% of the black vote, any state with over 30% black vote had him starting with that percentage, before anyone else voted.
Posted by: pp | May 10, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Bobbi,
He won’t carry California. The best he’ll do is carry San Fransico.
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 10, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Two flawed candidates mud-wrestling
to have a schizophrenic (racist v.
sexist) party pick a winner in the
near future….with political eunuchs
able to preside as superdelegates over
this internecine bloodbath. What a time
be a proud Democrat.
Posted by: hombre | May 10, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
OBAMA LOST TO HILLARY IN OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA.
THESE ARE ALL SWING STATES THAT COULD GO EITHER DEMOCRATE OR REPUBLIC…AND THEY WILL DECIDE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
OBAMA CAN NOT WIN IN EITHER OHIO AND PENNSYLVANIA BECAUSE OF HIS “BITTER” SMALL TOWN AMERICAN STATEMENT…AND HE CAN NOT WIN IN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN BECAUSE HE STOPPED THOSE TWO STATES FROM DOING A RE-VOTE.
HILLARY WILL WIN THE CRUCIAL STATES OF PA, OHIO, FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN…AND BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Sadstate, no way McCain will win Ca. That is just laughable.
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
At the end of the primary they will be very close in pledged delagates maybe even tied.He can’t win without super del
Posted by: Bishop | May 10, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Sad State of Affairs–
Are you nuts? Of course he will carry California and New York too, as well as the other states that always go Blue.
John McCain doesn’t have a chance in hell of winning California.
Do you live in California??
Posted by: Bobbi | May 10, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Actualy I read a report that if Cal was to vote today that Obama would carry the state over Clinton
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Fae: That is pure baloney wrapped up in salami and then video taped …
made me laugh out loud.
When he says Oprah is suspected of being a Les and Obama is a long legged pimp…SNL live wanna be and really assinine comments coming from a not very honorable messenger.
But thanks for the laugh. Where do these people come from…Creepyville.
Posted by: LL Barra | May 10, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
fontapa,
You are a Mainer? It doesn’t show. LOL
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 10, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
fontapa,
Do you ever allow for the possibility that you may be wrong?
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 10, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
I’ll take my bible and my “typical white woman” behind to the polls in November and vote McCain.Posted by: J | May 10, 2008 10:32:18 PM
Right on J, I’m with you on that.
Posted by: bluebird | May 10, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
OBAMA LOST TO HILLARY IN OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA.
THESE ARE ALL SWING STATES THAT COULD GO EITHER DEMOCRATE OR REPUBLIC…AND THEY WILL DECIDE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
OBAMA CAN NOT WIN IN EITHER OHIO AND PENNSYLVANIA BECAUSE OF HIS “BITTER” SMALL TOWN AMERICAN STATEMENT…AND HE CAN NOT WIN IN FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN BECAUSE HE STOPPED THOSE TWO STATES FROM DOING A RE-VOTE.
HILLARY WILL WIN THE CRUCIAL STATES OF PA, OHIO, FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN…AND BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT.
Posted by: John Pen | May 10, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
bluebird and j,
me too
Posted by: b | May 10, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
This is for Obama supporters, now you people are pushing Hillary to get out to save Obama face in Virginia and Kentucky, we Hillary supporters have patience we will wait for November, Obama will be begging Hillary for the support, with out Hillary support he will not win the genral election.
Posted by: anwar | May 10, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Might win by 30 points???? No the might is by 50 points. 30 points is guarenteed.
Posted by: s.b. | May 10, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
after the rantings on these posts for the last couple of months, no one deserves to win…
Posted by: rs | May 10, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Clinton is an explosive candidate, if she doesn’t get her way it is hard to tell what would happen.
Real Presidential material, I tell ya. I think one need to look at hopw unstable she is.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
fontapa, I completely agree with you. There are dem states that definately won’t vote for McCain. I think maybe even some Republican states won’t even vote for him. No way dems are losing this election. I will vote for Hillary even through I prefer Obama. But I don’t agree with the rebublican policies. And for Hillary supporters to say they will vote McCain just amazes me. I have read all the excuses and reasons but none make sense to me. I just see fear in their posts.
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
ron
WV is not republican state, bush won in 2000 & 2004 because democrats nominated 2 idiots. No democrats won White house without winning WV in the last 100 years. check the facts
Posted by: Tony | May 10, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Until the last vote is counted and all the Superdelegates etc have spoken, NOBODY has won. This is the US of A. Not the US of Obama.
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Well then the presidential election should just be held in WV then.
No point in wasting our time and money in the other 49 states.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 10, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Yeah..the presumptive, ostentatious, self righteous, anti-american Obama is going to get shellacked right off of his high horse. Amazing how the back stabbing, fence jumping democrats are so quick to turn their backs on Hillary. Remember people.. there are no guarantees in life. You never know when the winds of change may blow.
Posted by: Mare | May 10, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Mare said
Amazing how the back stabbing, fence jumping democrats are so quick to turn their backs on Hillary.
Do you have any idea what the Clintons have done to so many people to keep their legacy in tact. They are bullies and that’s why people don’t want them back in the white house. They feel it is owed to them, no thanks
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
lisa,
there is no fear in this post. i am a long time dem–straight party ticket–of 36 years. never voted republican, and i will this year if bho is the nominee. why, because some things trump ideology..the thought that michelle obama would stand as first lady here and abroad when she has never been proud of the country is too much; the thought that a man who is also a citizen of kenya is also our president, is too much; the thought that some one who can not call themselves an american, but has to add african-american, is too much; the fact that he has been in a church for 20 years that spews racist and un-american rhetoric, is too much; the fact that he is associated with people that are, or are affiliated with terrorists, is too much. i may not agree with mccain, but he is a patriot, who loves the country and calls himself an american. some things are just too basic to ignore.
Posted by: b | May 10, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
B,
I agree. There is just too many unknowns about Obama for me to vote for him. Also the knowns are a bit much for my liking.
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Don’t you think our President should know how many states there are?
Posted by: J | May 10, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
He will lose it and I believe he is trying to give Senator Clinton the contest so she can exit with dignity. He has enough supporters to reduce her lead significantly.
I respect the way he is handling this chapter of the ongoing saga. He respects Senator Clinton and at times I don’t think she is as respectful as he is towards her??
In any event I hope she can exit with her dignity in tact.
In a nutshell here is my sincere thoughts:
I have been a democratic voter for many elections and I have never seen a woman or black man create so much excitement.
I believe that the Obama appeal is his background and his platform to work with ordinary Americans. He understands what prejudice is and he didn’t grow up having everything, but his single (white) mother gave him the tools and support he needed to work towards earning a good education and self improvement. I believe he wants to “Unite” people and energize them as equals to do the best they can to live the American dream and that is truly a new dynamic.
I believe he will work for all the people and that is a very important part of being Commander and Chief of the greatest nation on earth.
I am proud to say I went into the California primary booth to actually vote for Senator Clinton because I knew who she was and out of nowhere I voted for Obama, a light went on in my head in the voter’s booth and I couldn’t forget his theme “CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN”. I thought for a few more seconds about some of his campaign slogans and things he brings to the table, so I voted for Obama.
I think all Americans need something to believe in and someone who understands the human condition before political fallout.
Posted by: Lou | May 10, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
B sorry reading your post is telling me you are fearful. You are saying you have a problem that Obama has a duel citizenship in Kenya. SO WHAT. What is wrong with Africa. And he is a proud African American. So why not say it. What is your prob with that. B get your head out of the sand. Maybe you’re just to old to change.
Posted by: lisa | May 10, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
lisa and fontapa…what part of being the president of the us of America don’t you get? you are not the president of the us of african-america. i want some one who is proud to be an american, not euro-american, or asian-american, but some one who considers this their country and does not split their patronage. EVEN, goddess oprah, calls herself an “american”.
Posted by: b | May 11, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Obama has divided the Party and the country. He needs to explain his connections to Hamas and why did he stage a break out with his pastor Wright. I will write Senator Clinton on the ballot if the DNC goes against Democrats and nomintes barack. He is unelectable, nominating him is handing the White house to McCain.
Posted by: libre | May 11, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Let the Lady have her due ….let her have her chance with the voters….Screw the math , Obama led by about 170 votes max. there are 5 primaries left at least and almost 270 undecided Superdelegates who could independently and supposed to be independently decide either way …That is a total of more than 350 delegates left or at least 300 …Then why you Obama people want Hillary to quit??? the heck with you …what about us who support Hillary and the rest of White, working-class , women voters , seniors , latino, asian people who support her ????Aren’t we not counted ???? the Heck with Unity of the Party ! Since when does that trump justice and fairness and polictical well-being of the nation??? this is the view of Partisan Liberal San Franciscan folks who probably make a lot of money yet know nothing and probably do nothing for the country when it matters any way …..you guys can go back to your Liberal city where most of you think of us as bitter …because we ARE BITTER now that you try to force your wills on us …we ARE bitter now that you want us to roll over and play dead so that your candidate can be the nominee and so that the Republican can win in Nov….We are extremely BITTER now that we Will vote Mc Cain in Nov. if Obama is the nominee….you bet we are bitter …..we are bitter that Pelosi , Dean , and Reed out of jeolousy of the Clintons want to fool us with their Unity of the Party B.S….we are Bitter and for your shake , watch it……go Hillary…..
Posted by: alohaone | May 11, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
His alliance with Rev Wright and Farrakahn, plus Michelle’s views and his speech the night of super Tuesday are enough reasons to believe his campaign is racist.
Posted by: libre | May 11, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
alohaone,
i think you have really hit on a larger issue…the disgust with reid, pelosi and dean, and the way they have squandered their opportunities these past couple years, and now embracing bho. for all their faults, the clintons have been successful in their individual political careers in working for their constituents for the better.
there is no eveidence of any sort of accomplishments for bho in the state or the us senate.
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Yavo Lem, the blue collar workers have said the same thing.
Posted by: d | May 11, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
no, yavo lem, it is not smart, but is how they do it…ha.
Posted by: sr | May 11, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Prove me wrong. Give me one policy/platform issue of his that you disagree with that isn’t a near match for Hillary’s position.
Posted by: fontapa ———
That is because most of his positions on things are borrowed from Edwards and Clinton. He has no original thoughts of his own.I’ll play your game as something that is not a near match “healthcare”.
Posted by: J | May 11, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Obama is against Universal Healthcare.
Posted by: libre | May 11, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Your cadidate of choice. Write in Senator Clinton on the ballot. Obama does not have a chance in the GE
Posted by: libre | May 11, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
I wish Hillary could win as an independent, but I fear that a write-in vote for her or no vote at all will result in a win for Obama. The best way to stop Obama if he is the Democratic candidate, is to vote for McCain. Better a Republican centrist, than an inexperienced, deceptive, ruthless, divisive, racist Obama.
Posted by: Susan | May 11, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
How the party thinks that Obama can win without Democrats from California, Pennsylvania, New York, Michigan, Florida, …? and the rural, blue collar, and Hispanic votes everywhere?
Posted by: libre | May 11, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Susan, you just described the Clintons
Posted by: lisa | May 11, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Lisa,
Obviously you didn’t get my point. He is not AFRICAN so why should be be called AFRICAN American. No black that was born in this country is AFRICAN. To be AFRICAN you need to be born there. Get it? Maybe I will start calling myself a European American. IF you are born in America you don’t need all that other baloney stuck in front of your ethnicity.
Posted by: J | May 11, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Idaho, Wyoming and Utah voted for Obama, because we did not know about his spirtual advisor Wright and Obama’s allegiange with Black theology. We did not know of his ties with Hamas and we didn’t know Michelles hate for America.
Posted by: libre | May 11, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
West Virginia and Kentucky might change Hillary’s chances; she’s already won many of the big ticket states and the only ones counting her out are the media and the DNC. ;0)
Both have been wrong beforel I remember being told one time that the Daily News had printed headlines that Dewey had won the presidential election…. but Roosevelt was the actual winner!
Let’s not count Hillary out yet!
I think she still has a heck of a following and may have sufficient support to squeak through.
Remember: the DNC is Humpty Dumpty ready to crack if it doesn’t swiftly shore up it’s chinks. (OOPS guys; that’s not “Chinese’.)
If they support someone so incendiary his followers threaten riot…. they’re toast….. just like Obama.
I’m strongly for Hillary, and
I approve this message!
Posted by: questioner | May 11, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Lisa,
How is B fearful of him? She stated legitimate concerns about him. The only part I didn’t agree with was the dual citizenship. I am also have been a democrat for 30+ years. His wife is has never in her adult life until now has been proud of America. I have a real problem with that. I also have a problem with Wright, Ayers and Rezko as well as his condescending remarks about “typical white woman”, and gun totin , bible thumping bigots.
Posted by: J | May 11, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
lisa, you, too, may label all you like…as bho “followers” do…but i could give a rats *** if you, bho, or anyone else calls themselves african americans, though it is inaccurate for most based on where you were born. what i do care about is THE representative of this country not calling themselves an “american”. end of point.
Posted by: b | May 11, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Questioner–
History lesson — Dewey Beats Truman -NOT Roosevelt.
The game isn’t over, the delegates don’t vote until the convention. I don’t think Hillary will take it there, however. She doesn’t want to hurt the party. She really doesn’t. If after all the primaries are done voting, Obama has the majority of pledged delegates she will probably step back. However, she will hold all of her delegates until the convention. If anything were to happen between now and the convention that makes Obama “unelectable” (whatever that means) then she could possibly be chosen by delegates defecting to her.
It is unlikely but it could happen. I hope it doesn’t happen, I am an Obama supporter but if it does and it is for legitimate reasons, I will vote democratic because that is what we all need to do.
Posted by: Bobbi | May 11, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
J I didn’t label anyone
Posted by: lisa | May 11, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Thanks rrt and cat…for reading my post ….someone better stop the arrogance that is coming from the Obama’s camp ….Let me post an ealier comment of mine…here .
I say for the shake of justice and fairness we should screw this Dem. party if they continue to force Hillary out …. they are biased against her and do not deserve to win in Nov. …If you in the name of the party let this injustice go un-noticed, you are not doing yourselves any favor ….you are just an partisan idiot ….that’s it ….I say do what is right even if the party go up in flames , that is the only way to fix it , otherwise, you are aiding injustice for the partisan purpose ……..If something is broken , then smash it and re-build , it may take some time and some sweat , but it is better than to leave it the rotten way it is , because it will never get fixed , no one will have the courage , ever…..Rules are rules , and they apply to anyone ….any one deserve the fair chance ….why a junior inexperient senator with a troubling view and much more troubling associations get the chance and a woman can not ????Hillary got her garbage , but at least we know what it is ….Where as in Obama , he was never properly vetted …..the Dem. better do it before the Republican do…..How many stuffs do we not know about Obama ….and his 20 years in Wright’s church …..He is not what he claims to be ….and worse yet , while Hillary is no saint , she is NOT as Anti-American as Obama is , and she does not and never buy into those “US injected Black with AIDS Virus” that Obama’s pastor has been feeding him for the last 20 years. Wake up Dem. voters before it is toooo late …No Obama ..
Posted by: alohaone | May 11, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
B you think Obama is not american enough for you. That’s fine, I really don’t care. I will vote for him because he is not old school politics.
Posted by: lisa | May 11, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
i thought bho was to be a uniter? and what is this about “his culture?” he is of black and white parents!!! the black/african american culture is only in the minds of those who use it. bho embraces that title because it benefits him.
those who use the african-american title do so to BE divisive. they WANT a separate identity. they do not want to be “just plain old americans”. if they were there would be nothing left that was different or “special”. dear lord, what would happen to affirmative action?
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
reaganfan,
what then is a 90% vote for bho in virtually all the states?
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Tina from Florida,
You should watch him at the townhall meeting in Oregon.
He allowed some audiences to ask him some questions.
The way he treated them was not very nice , I don’t know either he was tired or what.
He did not seem respect those audiences.
The first few minutes he said: eh,,eh,,eh,, and said you can take a look at my website.
I had to listen carefully what he said, it was not smooth answer.
Posted by: catleya | May 11, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
My mother is from England. She holds dual citizenship. Does that make me a British- American? NO. My dad’s ancestors were from Poland. Does that make me a Polish- American. NO. I have Spanish in there too, I don’t think I am a Spanish American.
These labels are STUPID.
Posted by: J | May 11, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Reaganfan,
Why West Virginians should be ashamed because they vote for Hillary?
In the other words you mean AA in SC & NC should be ashamed because they vote for Obama?
Posted by: catleya | May 11, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
And it was a prudent and well thought out choice for DC voters to re-elect Mayor “crack head” Barry.
Posted by: Mack | May 11, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
rrt:
Blacks voted for John Kerry 80-90% in
2004! They have had to vote for
whites all their lives!
What’s wrong with blacks voting for a
viable black candidate?
Posted by: reaganfan | May 11, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
reaganfan,
Don’t you see that it is your kind of attitude which accounts for the Democrats loosing states like WV? Everyone gets a voice in this country; everyone gets to vote. If you look down on everyone who does not agree with you, you will end up on the loosing end of the stick, for sure.
I thought that Obama was all about broadening the base. Did he/you mean just more students, more black people, more latte drinkers? His crie de coeur is unification and post-racial but I guess that only means if you agree with him and his suporters on everything.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 11, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Blacks voted for John Kerry 80-90% in
2004! They have had to vote for
whites all their lives!
What’s wrong with blacks voting for a
viable black candidate?Posted by: reaganfan
Nothing is wrong with it and I respect that. I just wish blacks would consider more in their choice. That’s all. I think that’s what the stink is all about.
Posted by: bluebird | May 11, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
raeganfan,
There is nothing wrong with blacks voting for Obama. It is what it is. HOWEVER, when Hillary says the white working class vote for her, suddenly that is racist! LOL
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 11, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Reagan fan:
I guess anyone who feels that when 92% of the black vote in North Carolina, and 91% of the black vote in Philadelphia are pro-Obama is reverse-racism…. is racist in your book.
There are white people in the mix too so in essence, THEY are the ONLY non-racist voters .
And I guess it’s OK for B O’s followers to threaten Clinton and McCain’s supporters with riots in the streets….
and all that sort of grown up stuff.
But here’s the thing:
Obama has already changed the outlook of the voters of this nation. He has chinked our viewpoint with a taste of how it could be… and was…. in the early fifties!.
I don’t think this is the change you were looking for…
But just remember that would along with such a sorry-assed change which most of you don’t want… and neither do we…. might come the exodus of the many benefits of affirmative action.
I think we need to use our brains when we vote rather than our scorn…. and consider our country before our party.
As for me, when I see B O, I see the color green and an empty smile.
And what I remember most is him standing on the podium encapsulated in 7 or 8 American flags as he spoke up for Pastor Wright and down for his white grandmother.
Thereafter, he made another speech AGAINST his pastor….. proving that in Obama’s world two wrights can still be a wrong.
I approve of this post!
Posted by: eyes open | May 11, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Seems to me the Obama supporters think anyone, for whatever their reasons are for not voting for him they are just simply racist. I don’t give rat’s behind if he is purple and looks like Barney. WE all have our reasons why we won’t vote for him and it has nothing to do with race.
Posted by: J | May 11, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008 1:30:18 AM
I second that. Couldn’t have said it better myself.
Posted by: bluebird | May 11, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
None of you seem to understand that a vote for Clinton OR McCain means 4 more years of Bush policy. Higher fuel cost, higher food cost, higher everything cost. My reason for stating this is as follows:
Remember who the Clinton’s travel around with. . .Bush Senior. In case none of you remember, Bill Clinton and George Bush Senior did speaking engagements and fund raisers for a few years TOGETHER after Bill Clinton’s term ended and I’m sure Hillary was present at most of these. Do you think that relationship will just be cut off if Hillary wins, OPEN YOUR MINDS AND THINK FOR A MINUTE. Second, most of her speeches are coined on what SHE is going to do as if she will be running the whole government alone. Sen. Obama wants to unite the USA as it should be for the good of all not just the oil company executives as it has been for the last eight years. McCain is the same story. There will be no change from the current policy if he is elected. Sorry the only change will be the prices of everything going up and the war casualties adding up. Clinton has lied oops “mis-spoke” on several occasions and she hasn’t even gotten in the White House yet. At least Bush had gotten in office before the mis-speaking, cabinet investigations and firings of dishonest officials of his team started. Yes it is time for change and a new movement in government. Not because of the race or gender of the person, that fact means absolutely NOTHING in the face of the true issues in our country now being suffered under the present REPUBLICAN president:
*A TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT.
*A WAR started on false information financed at a billion dollars per day.
*The highest job loss and company closures since the depression.
*Uncontrolled gouging of the American public on fuel cost based on false shortages.
*Misuse of funds. and on and on and on.
No the race nor gender doesn’t mean crap if the candidate will not be allowed to bring all the resources together to start working on these issues and give us the facts instead of a load of mis-spoken BS. And no I’m not a republican hater, I am a voter who is now independent (former republican) who wants the best for this country. Clinton and McCain are not going to give that because of their ties with the present president. Also for those of you who want to raise the “experience” issue. The Bush family had years of experience in government, former Governors, former CIA head, even former President, did all that “experience” help this country at all? With the Katrina disaster, the very weak dollar, the war, oil prices, job losses, the foreclosure situation and a host of may other issues if you can sit there and say yes and vote for Clinton or McCain based on the fact that Obama doesn’t have decades of experience, just remember that one of the greatest presidents John F Kennedy was faced with the same obstacle and Nixon played that “inexperience” card in his efforts to beat him. Fortunately it didn’t work as it will not work this time if people take time to really look at what has happened to our country lately, make the decision that there must be CHANGE, put the racial fears aside and vote for OBAMA!! If not I hope you’ve got a spare bicycle at your home to go to work on and land to grow your own food!
Posted by: Anthony | May 11, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am
I think folks trying to force Clinton out of the race is hurting the party.
It angers the 15 million Clinton supporters even more, not to mention the last states who want to vote.
Posted by: tomdavie | May 10, 2008 4:07:56 PM
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Anthony, we do understand, and we vote, anyone but bho, for reasons stated many times prior in this blog..
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
rrt,
Yeah they did push BHO on us. But the fact is half the country didn’t buy it. This should be a wake up call to all Americans do DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH about the candidates from here on out and don’t let the MSM or Dean, Pelosi or anybody else tell you who to vote for!
Posted by: J | May 11, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am
Well, Obama seems to be winning whites in Wyoming and Idaho… certainly not bastions of liberalism, or places w/ considerable amount of African-Americans… yet, he shellacked her in those places. Were those not working class whites? So the diff? Perhaps race.
Posted by: David | May 11, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am
reality check. looks like the democratic party is re aligning thats all. 1/2 the democrat’s may go republican, or indenpendent, women, hispanics, working class, and many disgruntled hillary supporters who feel the party abandoned them. new voters will make up some of the difference. in the end the republican party may end out stronger than ever. and maybe the democratic party will end out sort of like a little third party, made up of blacks, young voters, and elites. in either case it will be interesting. and in the end the fat cats and both our candidates all go back to their nice affluent lives, while the rest of us morons try to figure out how to pay the gas bill. neither candidate is going to dump the status quo-we are just the grunts that pay their salaries. if you are all excited expecting change or a personal invitation to the white house for some kool aid, boy are you in for a dissappointment. how to survive under the bus in 3 easy steps 1) avoid being run over by the tires 2) don’t lift your head underneath the muffler and do not inhale 3) pack a lunch, and a hankie it is going to be a long 4 years-just think by the time you crawl out from under the bus 1/2 of you will be one of those annoying older voters. i will wave as i go by on the Straight Talk Express’ and toss you some birth control pills.
Posted by: sonia trevino | May 11, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am
the saddest part of all this is we are suppose to be in the same party….
i believe the democratic party is defunct.
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am
Posted by: Chantel | May 11, 2008 5:01:05 AM
thanks…never thought of it that way. i guess i was more focused on the 90% thing…
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am
Obama beat Clinton by 30+ points in several states, many of them by trouncing her in the white vote. Did anyone raise questions about Clinton’s viability in the general election then? No. This will be the first time, aside from Arkansas, that Clinton beats him by that margin, big deal.
Posted by: Dem | May 11, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am
Posted by: tomdavie | May 11, 2008 5:09:58 AM
after 36 years of being a devoted dem, and never having voted republican, i too am leaving the party.
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 5:17 am 5:17 am
Posted by: Dem | May 11, 2008 5:12:30 AM
the big deal with wins, especially in the large states is that winning by one gets you all the delegates in the general election…if you add up all the delgates through penn. that each one won with winner take all, clinton had 1800+ and bho 1100+… go figure
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 5:20 am 5:20 am
Posted by: tomdavie | May 11, 2008 5:27:24 AM
think i have too many beliefs that do not fit in the republican party. i would like to see a third party come out of this democratic riff, perhaps a more centrist party. i am ready. perhaps it will be born of more civility.
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 5:38 am 5:38 am
I’m Canadian. I’ve been reading blogs all over and I’m fascinated by something.
That you prefer Senator Obama or Senator Clinton is your own decision. But that you dislike one of them so much you would vote for Senator McCain who is pro-Iraq war is very fascinating.
So those of you saying this, you are saying “I will vote on another one of our young man or woman die because my preference did not get the nomination?”
Am I getting this wrong?
(Shakes my head in sadness)
Kimberly
Posted by: Kimberly46 | May 11, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am
if you question the patriotism and abilities of a candidate…. you should not vote for him!
Clinton is definitely my first choice; If I am not given the opportunity to vote for her then I will definitely vote for McCain.. and hope that the checks and balances supposedly put into effect by the Constitution will come into play when it comes to the war>
Afterwards, I believe the Democratic Party should be dismantled and redesigned so that this circus of an election can never occur again.
Posted by: eyes open | May 11, 2008, 5:49 am 5:49 am
I think this election has proven that the press deserves no freedom.
I think Obama would be back at the starting gate if he were not Black!
The story of Obama is that of someone whose motives, according to his autobiography, are questionable…but he knows how to work a crowd and please the press .
Like his cousin Raila Odinga who he supported politically and financially when he ran for office in Kenya under the slogan “Your agent for change”, and like George Bush who also chanted for “Change”, Obama echoes the cheer.
But the change which now seems eminent…. at least until the G E in November… appears destined to send us back to the late 50′s!
And the Clintons, who have been staunch supporters of all races… are being treated like lepers by the press and by B O’s followers because they have acknowledged this truism!
Ninety two percent of the black vote in North Carolina was for Obama.
Ninety one percent of the black vote in Philadelphia voted for Obama.
True some of these people and some whites really thought about who they were voting for when they (mis)voted B U T you cannot honestly say that this isn’t exploitation of race and thus,
r a c i s m!
The prestige of an HONEST news story…. remember them???…. disappeared early on.
And the joke of Obama being swallowed by eight American flags on a podium defending his belligerent pastor lingers.
His free publicity was granted again when he finally flung his belligerent pastor “under the bus” by talking out of the other side of his mouth.
We know little of his policies but lots about his magnificent race speech and his talks of his young impoverished life… all free publicity!
Little was mentioned of his lack of accomplishment…. of his earmarking money for Michelle’s employer…. of taking money from Rezko supposedly intended for heating this landlord’s broken down tenements and freezing tenants.
Meanwhile, Hillary’s accomplishments have been swept beneath the carpet; all ears and eyes have been diverted to THE blue dress and her initial failed health plan. (The successful health plan which has since thrived and helped in the healing of 6,000,000 children is never mentioned!)
During the last debate through which Obama stumbled and stuttered, Clinton answered a question about what to do about Iran. (Obama was still trying to get thoughts to reach his tongue).
She suggested the “Umbrella of Deterrence”… not a unique idea…. but an IDEA which might have become a stepping stone to other ideas (Although I think that it’s a great idea which, used with caution and p unity might prove quite worthy in its own right.)
The press colored Hillary’s spur of the moment response as something very suspect and Obama’sposters went wild in their disdain… dis remembering that Obama was still thinking up an answer!
In addition to the prejudiced press,The DNC is broken! It has effectively disenfranchised two states full of voters from being able to select their nominee…… but it is very satisfied with itself and in it’s self-analysis has deemed itself G-D to the Constitution!
My point is this:
Obama is a new face. He hasn’t accomplished much….so aside from his questionable associates there’s not too much to fault him for.
He presents a neat presence, speaks well in front of a teleprompter… though I have seen his querulous side peeking through several times.
The press decided early on that they favored him…. and skewed their news stories his way on too many occasions.
There have been instances in which a story issued incorrect information… but corrections either required a password and a mouse-over…. or were omitted!
I think this election has proven that the press deserves no freedom.
I think Obama would be back at the starting gate if he were not Black!
And the Clintons, who have been staunch supporters of all races… are being
treated like lepers by the press and by B O’s followers because they’re being honest about this truism!
I blame both the Press and the DNC for this travesty…a onesided pre-determined circus which, if we are not lucky, might win us a President who is unfit…. and undeserving.
Meantime, I’ll continue to back Hillary because of the three, I think she’s best.
I approve of this message
Posted by: eyes open | May 11, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am
in the usa the blacks are what, 12% of the population? and bho gets 90%…not great math bho supporters.
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am
There are really to many Republicans passing themselves off as Hillary or Barack supporters. This only to get the dems fighting among themselves so as to forget the real important issues. I guess this is the continuation of operation chaos, this is pitiful that a great party such as the Republicans must resort to trickery, lies, distortion to salvage a party devoid of ideas that are needed by America.
Such as abortion rights, an end to the Iraq war, Healthcare reform, economic and energy plan,Education, honest governance and a plan for the future
Don’t believe the hype!!
Dems o8
Posted by: jld1959 | May 11, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am
I’m changing my registration from democrat to republican the day the DNC nominates this clown, maybe even sooner. The democratic party’s behavior this year towards michigan and florida voters, plus the dnc’s sexist bias against hillary has been atrocious and I want no part of their “new” coalition. I will not support a lying, fraud who sympathizes with terrorists and surrounds himself with radical racist advisors, mentors and funders. bo is a disgrace. this is a not a personality contest. his questionable agenda and connections are a serious threat to our national security.
Posted by: cc | May 11, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am
Posted by: cc | May 11, 2008 7:19:48 AM
i agree. i plan on registering as “unaffiliated”. might want to think about it and we can see how all the hillary supporters can channel their anger/energy into a new party that brings our values into play.
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am
News – USA got 7 more states. Obama thinks there are 57 states in USA.
We want this person to be our president?
What a joke…
Posted by: Jack | May 11, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am
Guns, church and blinded veils covering the country’s worst family incest history (and present, even in supposedly respectable families!)… Hey, I’ve landed here in good ole WV and hear the stories… yes, Obama will lose WV by a large margin…folks here are thinking in simple terms… “Clinton is a two-fer and Bill’s term was during a more prosperous time, so maybe if we bring him back he knows how to fix this, and avoid the prospect of voting for a colored man”… simple thinking of folks that can’t get their aged and poorly run state out of the 1800′s… fortunately those ‘specialty white voters’ don’t have anywheres near the same demographic meaning…. new map out there, millions new voters…. Clinton’s old plans failed, just like Washington did… they just haven’t realized their political strategies are defunct schemes.
Posted by: origood | May 11, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am
Ya know, the Clinton years left the ‘specialty brand of white folks’ without jobs, didn’t materialize on health care and due to Clinton’s poor management, they even lost the white house majority, so democrats became ineffective… over time we saw the results of it… not during the internet boom of Clinton’s years… But, at least the internet has come back to bite him… it’s provided us with a new voter base so the ‘specialty brand of whites’ (yes, I’m white and female) won’t have so much chance to assist their tough sounding Dem or stupid GOP … the so-called Guts and Glory hyped-up candidates of the old political machine.
Posted by: origood | May 11, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
Posted by: origood | May 11, 2008 7:48:00 AM
honey, you can have the new voter base, with all its vile commentary against a fellow democrat, and see how far it gets you in the november election without the “old political machine”…remember, hillary and bho have just about split the party votes in half. the democratic party has shot itself in the foot with this one. the hillary camp needs to move on and find our own way, with our own ethics, morals and agenda…
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am
What Hillary supporters and the media tends to forget is,
Obama won Wisconsin, Missouri, Iowa, Nevada, Alaska, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Kansas, North Dakota, Utah, Nebraska, Maine, Vermont, Wyoming and Connecticut
Majority of white voters
The fact is, Obama has won more “white” states then “black” states
Posted by: Vanessa | May 10, 2008 5:58:21 PM
Obama has won more caucuses than primaries.
Posted by: Lookup | May 11, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am
most of the list are caucus states. Activists screwed the whole process
Posted by: Tony | May 11, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
“Almost Heaven, West Virginia”
Apparently not for B.O.
Posted by: prcleburne | May 11, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Obama will lose the general election. Former Democrat and Hillary supporter. Go McCain!
Posted by: kittyCat | May 11, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Sen. Hillary Clinton should run as an independent candidate for president in the fall–I bet she can defeat both Obama and McCain. This would be like Sen. Joe Lieberman who lost in the democratic primary, but in the general election! Hillary sould dump all those losers in the DNC. Bill Clinton won in a three way race in ’92, remember?
Vote for Independent Hillary 08!
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 11, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Great idea Charleychaplin, she should go indepenant. Screw the DNC, they can have their chosen one. I’d vote for Hillary if she ran on an indepenant ticket in a heartbeat.
Posted by: kittyCat | May 11, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Hillary Clinton running strong everywhere! Now, Obama folks are running scared having manipulated many a caucus with small groups of zealots. Obama has not won a single battle ground state! Sen. Hillary Clinton should run as an independent candidate for president in the fall and I bet she can defeat both Obama and McCain. This would be like Sen. Joe Lieberman who lost in the democratic primary, but won in the general election! She could also get 80 million in public financing. Dump the creeps in the DNC!
Let’s hope and pray for Independent Hillary for 08!
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 11, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Oops, I pushed the post button too soon, I spelled independant incorrectly. Go Hillary, if not then McCain
Posted by: kittyCat | May 11, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
She’ll beat him by more than 30 points. That’s also a swing state he’s IGNORING. Popular vote means plenty to Super Delegates. Winning states we will need to win in November means plenty to Super Delegates.
Any major white votes Mr. Hope got in earlier states was because the racist Rev. Wright was an unknown to them. I’m sure there’s millions who wish they could take their votes back and they will IN NOVEMBER….should Mr. Hope be allowed to STEAL this election by not counting MI and FL.
Posted by: Vickie | May 11, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Hillary; first choice
McCain; second choice
Racist Obama — NEVER!
Posted by: Susan | May 11, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
You want to finally see a third party? All HRC has to do is announce ala Leiberman that she’s gonna run as an Independent. We’ve been waiting to rid ourselves of the 2 party system for a long long time. Now that the DNC is re-making themselves into ONLY the young and inner city voter ( see Donna Brazile for more info), its time for an Independent President.
Posted by: glenn mcgahee | May 11, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I have never heard H “Repulsive” Cinton start and finish a sentence. When she
comes on I go to a different channel.
Now there are reports she’s going to
fight like hell for the Number 2 spot.
A disgusting loser.
Posted by: anon | May 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Hillary Clinton running strong everywhere! Now, Obama folks are running scared having manipulated many a caucus with small groups of zealots. Obama has not won a single battle ground state! He’s been propped up by the big media for so long, that’s to get rid of Hillary Clinton. Obama is the corporate candidate. But people are behind Sen. Hillary Clinton all the way! For example, conservative political writers like David Brooks, William Kristol, Robert Novak and others who were promoting and pulling for Obama and condemned Hillary Clinton are now turning back to McCain. All that was a big media ploy and just about to poke a hole in Obama’s balloon!
Sen. Hillary Clinton should run as an independent candidate for president in the fall–I bet she can defeat both Obama and McCain. This would be like Sen. Joe Lieberman who lost in the democratic primary, but won in the general election! She could also get 80 million in public financing. Bill Clinton won a three-way race in’92, remember? Dump the creeps in the DNC!
Let’s hope and pray for Independent Hillary for 08!
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 11, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
I have never heard H “Repulsive” Cinton start and finish a sentence.
Well at least she can put a sentence together and think on her feet. Sen. Obama takes too much time getting something across, it just makes him look indecisive. I don’t think your candidate is repulsive. Unlike you, I have respect for all the candidates. I like him, I just don’t think he’s ready.
Posted by: bluebird | May 11, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
The Democratic nomination has already
been won by Obama.
H “Repulsive” Clinton is tilting at
windmills for nothing. It’s garbage time. The game is already over.
Posted by: anon | May 11, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
I find it disturbing that some people have posted that African Americans have voted for Sen. Obama on the basis of skin color. What about the droves of women that have voted for Sen. Clinton solely on the basis that she’s a woman? If Sen. Clinton gets 90% of the white vote in WV, will you also say that that was based on skin color? I personally don’t care who anybody votes for. I respect your right to do so. I also defend that right. I’m a Soldier in the U.S. Army. What disturbs me is the anger and villification of the respective candidates. Then to say that African Americans are voting for Sen. Obama solely because of skin color offends me.
Posted by: Nick | May 11, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
the redundant pundits continue to push the notion that a ticket with clinton on it would not be in the best interest of the country. hmm, seems the people pushing this idea are nervous about a former successful, popular, highly intelligent and patriotic two term president as the spouse of either the next president or vice president. interesting how they can pontificate non-stop on how a 20 year relationship between obama and his highly opinionated mentor and minster was no problem for him to handle, but they’re saying he can’t handle bill?
Posted by: meandshelia | May 11, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
WV and KY will go for Sen. Clinton. Barack Obama will get the nomination. John McCain will the November election. And that’s a good thing, too. Imagine a Congress with large Democratic majorities, Nancy Pelosi from SF as House Speaker and Barack Obama in the Oval Office. That’s a recipe for out-of-control federal spending and even larger national debt. We need John McCain in the White House to negotiate reasonable compromises and then wield the veto pen as needed.
Posted by: Graniteman | May 11, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
rrt,
Yeah they did push BHO on us. But the fact is half the country didn’t buy it. This should be a wake up call to all Americans do DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH about the candidates from here on out and don’t let the MSM or Dean, Pelosi or anybody else tell you who to vote for!
This is an excellent point. It was really weird about the media. I couldn’t stand MSNBC anymore, switched.
Posted by: bluebird | May 11, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
GraniteMan: You make an interesting point. I’ve been involved in politics here in California, and I believe, like you, that it works best when there is some sort of balance. I am a lifelong Democrat, however, here in California when the legislature and the governor were controlled by the Democrats, there was some pretty irrational legislation coming from Sacramento. Unfortunately, I think that a divided government which gets less done, is better than a government which is controlled by one party with essentially the same ideology. I do believe, however, that a centrist candidate from either party, may accomplish the same benefit. That’s why I support Hillary Clinton first, John McCain second.
Posted by: Tim | May 11, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
charliechaplin
as a 53 year old black supporter of sen. clinton, i hope she runs as an independent, i will vote for her.
I hope she does not let obama pay off her debts for her brain to help him win.
everybody knows she is smarter than he is.
we americans are fools to put someone who has such a short political resume’
and who we know so little about. just fools we are. race was not an issue at the top of the politcal list this year.
and i wish people would stop saying sen.clinton played the race card first, she did not. if you would just think about it. it was not to her advantage to play the race card. she had the black support, obama had to cut into it.
obama and crew played the race card first. people latched on to it, because they couldn’t believe or didn’t want to believe obama would, and some people will blame anything bad THEY can think up on the clintons.
if it wasn’t a race thing with the black people they would have paid attention to the issues of both and many not all would have stayed with sen. clinton. the black upper middle class will do well with anyone in office. it is the workingclass and poor blacks who will suffer. and i am sure when obama starts to go south and the sheen wears off-the clintons will be blamed.
I hope and pray sen. clinton will do no more than say vote for obama and no more.
i think it will be a shame if she is expected to lend her brain power to help him win.
he thinks she is so inexperienced, let her go on her way.
he can win with kennedy!
so the stumbling, fumbling dummy with the money wants to buy the girl with the brain.
I hope she will not sell.
nobama
Posted by: justsaying | May 11, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Hillary; first choice
McCain; second choice
Racist Obama — NEVER
larry sinclair big problem for obama,,, how you obama people are going to fix this one …. another speech…….god bless america
Posted by: ERIC | May 11, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
how you are going to fix larry sinclair comment…. is in television in puerto rico…… the hole war will know about it get another speech ready… maybe………. very good…… you has some home work to do you will lose the general election. go. mccain.
Posted by: ERIC | May 11, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
nick,
thank you for your service to our country.
maybe you have missed how the msm has decided obama will be president. and how they have shown nothing but disrespect to sen. clinton.
i wonder how YOU feel about sen. clinton. she has been the most vilified
of ALL of the candidates, the msm laid into her from the beginning saying she felt it was her birthright to be president and so forth. sen. clinton has been a good american citizen, and has tried and done a lot of good for this country. and the msm has not recognized it at all. sen. obama has a short record to show, and they have put him up to be some type of savior of the country. he had no record. so all they could do, is tear her down for him.
Posted by: justsaying | May 11, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
mc. cain 2008 pelosi and dean go home you are going to lose …..GO MCCAIN.
Posted by: ERIC | May 11, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Tim,
Your comments about California are interesting. I used to live in Massachusetts where there is a similar problem: The legislature is overwhelmingly Democratic. That’s why voters elected a series of Republican governors like Mitt Romney to keep the big spenders in check. I could live with Hillary (and Bill) Clinton back in the White House: They are centrists who understand the need for fiscal responsibility. Barack Obama is an ultraliberal who cut his teeth on corrupt Chicago machine politics. John McCain is a moderate Republican who will try to bring about compromise between Dems and Republicans. I’m a lifelong Democrat in NH who plans to vote for McCain if Senator Obama is nominated by my party.
Posted by: Graniteman | May 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
I thought in Obamaland there is only 48 states, since he wants to omit Florida and Michigan.
Now he says we have 57 states. He is losing his bearings. Mid-life crisis.
Hillary-McCain-no vote
Posted by: cindy in nc | May 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
when we’re this far in and Barack is a lock to win the nomination, the answer changes
how does he win more white middle class voters? balance the ticket. Sebelius would balance nicely, so would Webb. Richardson balance’s in a different way that may not help in say, WV but would in other places.
Posted by: Gion | May 11, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
I do not have anything against Clinton but think given the choice Obama is better. But my respect for Clintons have gone down now.
Can some Clinton supporters explain why she is still running since last Primary?
Why can’t they accept the fact that Obama got majority of delegates and now almost majority of Super-delegates?
They wanted to seat Michigan and Florida delegates going against the rules as it will favor them now. So if we change the rules after the game has started what will happen in next primaries when any state could anything they like.
About the experience of Clinton, I can only laugh that being a first lady is counted towards the experience she has.
This is the same politics as usual that I hate and one of the main reason I think Obama is way better.
All the Clinton people who will vote for McCain are very welcome to do so if they like
1. Iraq War to continue
2. Tax cut for Rich
3. All other Bush’s policy that McCain is adopting to please the Republican base.
Please remember that Majority of people has voted for Obama in Primaries.
Posted by: 2Cents | May 11, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
2Cents,
Some corrections:
1. Obama will keep war as long as it can (he admitted himself)
2. Obama will increase your tax for sure for his big “change”
3. McCain is a moderate and Obama is too left…
Posted by: True Truth | May 11, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Why would you want the clintons back in the White House?
bill clinton disgraced the White House! That is OUR house, we vote to put him there, so who gave him permission to disgrace it? If he wanted to cheat on his wife, he should have found someplace else to do it.
bill clinton is the main reason we got george bush….and you clowns want to put him BACK?
Whoever wins, lets do something about the educational system in this country. Right now it sucks!
Posted by: LA in Indiana | May 11, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
besides saying “I’ve been all 57 states…” which is well known now, Sen. Obama has also said, “100 million were killed in Mynnamar…!” and “she was punished with a baby!”
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 11, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Can some Clinton supporters explain why she is still running since last Primary?
Because she can still win the nomination on the DNC floor if neither gets the 2025.
Posted by: bluebird | May 11, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
There are 50 states. Six territories.
Guantanamo Bay is administered
and controlled by the United States.
Then there is Washington, D.C. They
all have the same President – the POTUS.
That’s 58. Obama’s 57 is close enough.
Posted by: anon | May 11, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
You really shouldn’t fear intelligence.
And you fear loosing at the DNC convention. S. Obama is great, I admit, but I just don’t think that he can win in a GE. He’s not experienced, and even if he ge the 90% of the minority votes and a minority of whites, that’s all he would get because half the Democrates voted for Clinton. It’s a tough situation for the party. And the delegates should decide at the DNC floor who is more electable come Nov. Yeah, I know, I’m a racist for saying this.
Posted by: bluebird | May 11, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
As far as Bill Clinton is concerned, can anyone in politics anywhere hold the candle to Bill Clinton for his service for America and the world? He was one of our best presidents! He left office with 450 Billion surpluses! He helped more low, middle and high income Americans to prosper. President Clinton brought us respect and dignity around the world. What more proof do you need? He’s respected and beloved not only in American but around the world! How many US presidents have reached that stature? I know dogs howl at the moon but the moon isn’t going to fall down. Remember these are the same people in the media who cheered us blindly invade Iraq who are now cheering for Sen. Obama. Our country needs Sen. Hillary Clinton more than ever to pull us out of the slippery slope of decline and to end the nightmare that has lasted for seven long years!
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 11, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
As far as Bill Clinton is concerned, can anyone in politics anywhere hold the candle to Bill Clinton for his service for America and the world? He was one of our best presidents! He left office with 450 Billion surpluses! He helped more low, middle and high income Americans to prosper. President Clinton brought us respect and dignity around the world. What more proof do you need? He’s respected and beloved not only in American but around the world! How many US presidents have reached that stature? I know dogs howl at the moon but the moon isn’t going to fall down. Remember these are the same people in the media who cheered us blindly invade Iraq who are now cheering for Sen. Obama. Our country needs Sen. Hillary Clinton more than ever to pull us out of the slippery slope of decline and to end the nightmare that has lasted for seven years!
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 11, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Until 2025 is reached, neither has the nomination. Period. “Declaring” yourself the nominee is just as arrogant and manipulative as I would expect from this upstart.
If passing grade in a class is 60, it does not matter if you have a 57 and I have a 55 – neither one of us passed, unless extra credit (superdelegate count) is offered.
I’m not saying she will win, I’m just expecting (hopelessly, I’m sure) a bit of grace from the winner. Well, with global warming and all, hell won’t freeze either, I guess.
Posted by: Bea | May 11, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
LA in Indiana -
Your post makes no sense. She did nothing but be similarly discraced. It would be a reason to vote FOR her, not AGAINST her. Find another phony reason to hate – this one doesn’t work.
Posted by: Bea | May 11, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
thank you bea,
i thought la in indiana just must have been having a senior moment.
when bill clinton was in the white house economics in MY house were great.
and bill clinton is NOT the reason we got geo. bush. period.
Posted by: justsaying | May 11, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
The number of elected delegates won
in the primaries and the caucuses is the only thing that matters.
The number of states won, the popular vote, the specious electability argument and other similar criteria count for nothing. Superdelegates have never nominated a candidate who finished with fewer delegates in the
primaries and the caucuses.
Posted by: anon | May 11, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Truth about the Clintons years — A MIXED BAG THEY WERE!
1. If the ‘Clintons years’ were that great, why did the American people DID NOT want to continue the Clinton legacy with Al Gore?
After all, the ‘Reagan years’ were gambled with for at least 4 more years of Daddy Bush?
2. American people were so put off by the Clinton barefaced lie (‘I did not have sex with that woman’).
3. Americans were put off by the Clinton bad example of ‘cheating on wife’ to America’s husbands.
4. Americans were put off by the Clintons taking advantage of Monica Lewinski, a woman young and naive enough to be their own daughter.
5. Americans were put off by Clinton debasing the White House that they DID NOT want a continuation of the Clinton years.
6. Americans were so put off by the IMPEACHED Clintons that they did not want Al Gore continuing the corrupted legacy of the Clintons.
7. Economy was great during the Clinton years.
8. The self-centered and self-absorbed Clintons SELFISHLY DESTROYED THEIR OWN LEGACY, just as Hilary is REPEATING before our eyes!
9. The Clintons debased behavior denied Al Gore AND ENABLED BUSH!
10. Clintons years were a MIXED BAG of self-absorbed highs and selfish lows.
11. The Clintons mixed bag so disgusted the American people that they gambled and ‘committed suicide’ with a bungling Bush!
12. Please!
No more about the ‘Clinton years’; because the ‘Clinton years’ caused the horrible horrible Bush years!
Time for a change to something better for good and decent Americans.
Posted by: Patriot | May 11, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
As I recall from high school, math isn’t as much fun as stomping someone.
Remember, we are uneducated rednecks who don’t understand Obama. Stomping the smart kid on the playground we understand completely.
This will go down as the weirdest election in American history.
Posted by: len | May 11, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
To Mr. Graniteman, you are 100% correct John McCain will be President and the “change” candidate will have a November 5, 2008 Wednesday morning “NO” prayer breakfast with John Kerry and Ted Kennedy and John Edwards. In 2004 John Kerry won Ma,RI,CT,NJ,DE, Wis, Min, Ill Wash,Org, Calif, MD. DC, Pennsylvania and Michigan
HOWEVER THIS TIME JOHN MCCAIN WILL ALSO WIN PENNSYLVANIA AND MICHIGAN; WITH TOM RIDGE ON THE TICKET. I HAVE CANCELED MY CLEARWIRE INTERNET SERVICE FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS EFFECTIVE TOMORROW. NO CHANGE, NO HOPE, AND NO FUTURE IN BLOGGING ABOUT POLITICAL MATTERS I CANNOT IMPACT HERE IN FLORIDA. BEST WISHES TO ALL. ON FEBRUARY 19, 2009 I WILL NO LONGER HAVE TELEVISION SO I WILL NOT EVEN CARE WHAT PRESIDENT MCCAIN DOES WITH THE WAR. JOIN ME AT WHOCARESHALLOFFAME TO REMEMBER THE FUTURE THAT COULD HAVE BEEN.
Richard Paul Dembinsky Port Orange Florida
Posted by: richarddembinsky | May 11, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Hillary is the one that’s trying to cause a major drift between some of these white blue collars by making it seem as if she’s the ONLY candidate that can make this demographic vote democrat in the general election. Bill Clinton, on his many town stop speeches, will tell the crowd that Hillary is here because of people like ‘them’ and she’s the only candidate that will fight for people like ‘them’ painting Obama as some kind of out of touch elitist – this is the kind of tactic one would use to total separate a voter’s frame of mind againt a candidate and you’d think the Clinton’s would realize that they are hurting someone in their own party. This division the Clinton campaign wants to create and they could care less if they destroy the party. If Clinton will step out of the way or at least stop her negative one-sided campaigning, Obama will be given the opportunity to do even better with this group. But right now it appears that Hillary is prolonging this fight to make it more difficult for Obama in the general election. Shame on her SNL yesterday was right.
Posted by: rant3000 | May 11, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
the truth is obama supporters, you may have won the battle of beating sen. clinton (and maybe, in your short sight that is all you wanted to do) but if you really thought obama would be president-he will not.
because of your choice in the primaries
we will all be hearing the name
president mccain-in the end (even if it is against they better interest) no way will obama win against john mccain the war hero. after we get finished with see the video’ of mccain getting off that plane a freed pow. against obama and rev. wright-obama will wish he had not run for president.
no matter that mccain voted against offering more for the vets of today.
it will be interesting to see how he will cut down mccain.
obama will not win the POTUS
Posted by: justsaying | May 11, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
rant-if hillary does not try to speak up for the rural people, who is there to speak for them? obama is not? if bill is there saying whatever he is saying to them-it IS because no one else is speaking for them.
if the rural white have been neglected it is obama who has neglected them
Posted by: justsaying | May 11, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
The number of elected delegates won
in the primaries and the caucuses is the only thing that matters.
The number of states won, the popular vote, the specious electability argument and other similar criteria count for nothing. Superdelegates have never nominated a candidate who finished with fewer delegates in the
primaries and the caucuses.
anon
=========================================
Oh, really. The contests are not over until June 3. As I pointed out before, Clinton has a voter pool of nearly twice that of Obama, giving her West Virginia, Kentucky and Puerto Rico, and giving him Oregon, South Dakota and Montana. On the strength of this alone, the probability is that Clinton will wind up with a larger popular vote, more PLEDGED delegates (she’s only 78 off the pace at this point) and yes, her potential Electoral College strength, based on performance to date, will count for a lot, as will experience and knowledge. As I said before, “Super Delegates” do not matter at this point. They should not be counted, as they are not PLEDGED to any candidate, even though they may have endorsed one. Some, as you may have noted have switched their endorsements, which is proof of what I am talking about. An endorsement does not equal a vote, period. If it goes to a DEADLOCKED Convention, then the “Super Delegates” matter, but not before. Therefore, the true scorecard, as of May 11, 2008 is: Obama 1,410 and Clinton 1,332 with a difference of 78. Of course that will change on Tuesday, won’t it? But it won’t be in Obama’s favor.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 11, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Bluebird,
Don’t be afraid if people saying you are racist for saying it.
I don’t think it’s racist.
I keep saying it too.
I know I’m not racist myself, I favor black people .I watch their movies,I listen to their songs, I make friend with them.
It’s tha fact. Sam Donaldson said it on the George S this morning.He said probably people might call hin a racist after his comment.
Obama should face it in the GE.
Posted by: catleya | May 11, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Charleychaplin,
It’s always to read your comments.
Thanks.
Posted by: catleya | May 11, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Yavo Lem,
I agree.
we will see after super tuesday.
Posted by: catleya | May 11, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Perhaps the reasons so mny superdelegates are on the Obama bandwagon is because he has promised financial help during their next election or even maybe a high-paying government job when he is elected. That is the kind of campaigns and politics he has always followed and will continue to follow. It has absolutely nothing to do with best qualifications and best character. It is just very dirty politics.
Posted by: Mai | May 11, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
mai,
YOU ARE CORRECT.
dirty politics-
but no matter obama will not win in nov.
once they put obama and wright and ayers up against mccain the war hero. the american people do not know enough aobut obama
he will not be president.
and before someone says something about hagee and mccain
first mccain didn’t sit and listen to hagee for 20 years.
obama dumped his preacher for politcal reasons
mccain grabed on to hagee for politcal reasons.
and i will still bet mccain the war hero will win out.
Posted by: jgaw | May 11, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
LA in Indiana: You have no clue what you’re talking about. Bill Clinton left office with a 65% APPROVAL RATING IN THE POLLS! GW Boosh was NOT appointed president because of Bill Clinton! GW Boosh and his SCOTUS STOLE the election. He was never elected and Bill Clinton was loved by a MAJORITY of people in this country when he left office. Get your facts straight before you insult one of our GREATEST Presidents EVER. Okay?
Posted by: Vickie | May 11, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
and lets not forget-yes bill clinton had an affair with a woman in the white house.
but the impeachment was a witch hunt and all right thinking people know it.
it was the dumb right’ way of trying to hurt him. and he stupidly put a bullseye on his back. but as far as helping the american people economically bill clinton did it.
and he did what he could to level the playing field for the poor black people.
Posted by: jgaw | May 11, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
JUST WONDERING:
At least 31,000 OF THE N C VOTES FOR
B O were double-counted…. not that it counted there B U T
Obama, always did so much better in caucuses and we know there was a lot dirty stuff going on in Texas.
Isn’t it plausible that there was a lot of underhanded voteknapping and switcheroo in the other caucus states as well?
Posted by: questioner | May 11, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
questioner said ::: are you confirming that Obama is going to attack anyone who doesn’t vote for him and send his troops out to riot and pilfer?
Nah blacks usually only murder loot and burn down buildings where they live then blame the whites. With Liberal Democrats cheering them on. The news loves this so also blames the WHITES
Posted by: fat bag fool | May 11, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Yeah! Spread the Word, thanks for the information!
Posted by: irma | May 11, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Those of you saying LOL about Obamas supporters being intimidating are completely lost. I was in Nevada and Texas and the supporters were brutal. They verbally attack people based on physical appearance and assumptions and they misled people. Well, all one needs to do is read Obama supporters posts to know it’s true. The media is hiding the fact that Obama supporters are this way and I wonder why? The Jefferson-Jackson dinner was a perfect example of how disgraceful their behavior is, but we didn’t hear anything on the news about it did we?
Posted by: irma | May 11, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
spread the word,
i read the letter saved it
i suggest all other sen. clinton supporters save it-it will be deleted from here.
but sen. clinton supporters go to it. and send it.
it is well worded-not to extremist.
i think if they get enough of them they will take notice.
Posted by: jgaw | May 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
I hope the rank hostility here against Obama’s candidacy wanes come the Fall. Bill is destroying a candidacy to save his wife’s. It’s not admirable. He’s feeding rural voters BS about being neglected and laughed at by the “elites”. Give me a break, Bill. I thought you were better than that. I voted for you twice, defended you down here in RED Texas when all my friends/co-workers cursed your name for lying to your wife, your daughter and your country. I defended you, sir.
Now you go around planting ideas in people’s heads…people whose support we need in the fall. People who, if they follow your advice, will again vote agianst their interest in the fall by voting for McCain because BClinton came down there and told them Obama thinks they are lesser people. Classless, Bill.
I think voters will wise-up to you in due time. This train is moving downhill and you and your wife can’t stop it. All your surrogates are peeved becasue they will be losing their influence in the Party once Obama is the defacto leader. That’s why we get these hostile rants from the likes of Carville, Begala, Lanny Davis, Joe Wilson and Larry Johnson. Their time is over, and they can’t fathom the idea just yet.
So, i hope all you supporters of Hillary will hop on board in the fall. There is a new dynamic evolving in politics. Millions of volunteers will be out on the street this fall camaigning for a man they truly believe in. Obama is a decent man, with a new approach to politics. He’s not perfect…and he’s not the freakin’ devil. We all must hitch our wagon to his candidacy this fall, look at the alternative. The alternative will lose out…maybe not this fall, but they will lose out.
That concept of politics has run its course. Rove and Hillary have knocked down their las straw man. We are better than this. We are about to prove it to ourselves and everyone else out there. Come on aboard…you are all welcome and there is plenty of room.
Posted by: dave | May 11, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
That concept of politics has run its course. Rove and Hillary have knocked down their las straw man. We are better than this. We are about to prove it to ourselves and everyone else out there. Come on aboard…you are all welcome and there is plenty of room.
No way. I’ve had enough of your candidate and his supporters. Yes, I know, I’m a racist for saying this.
Posted by: bluebird | May 11, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Posted by: dave | May 11, 2008 9:32:44 PM
sorry, dave, no can do…i do not like that ride, and i do not like the driver..
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
he’s only the presumptive nominee because you media types have said us. Us democrats are waiting for the race to finish and all voters and the DNC to have their say. He has a REAL problem with white working class voters and yes, I’m saying the word white..oh boo hoo. Obama wants to have a conversation on race only if he’s the one doing the talking. The minute anyone else does his surrogates scream race baiting. Obama has race baited the entire primary season, firing up blacks that the white boogey man, in this case, the Clintons who have worked tirelessly for civil rights causes, are out to steal what is theirs. That’s called affirmative action…nominating somone just because they are black. But what can we expect from a guy who supported a racist, hate monger of a pastor for 20 years. Obama is the most racially divisive political figure in our country’s history. The most liberal nominee and the weakest. I’m a dem who wants him to lose just so his arrogant, bullying supporters don’t get their way.
Posted by: Beth | May 11, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Hillary supporters unite to STOP OBAMA in the fall if he’s the nominee! Don’t let the bullying men get their way yet again! Obama and his supporters have bashed Hillary with their friends in the media for months. Yet he slides with this farce of a speech on race they the media fawned over that has now been shown to be a lie. Our party has pushed around the wrong people–the women and working class who are its backbone. He can’t win on the black vote alone. We can live through 4 more GOP years if we lived through the last 8. Who wants Obama high taxes anyway. I’d rather a war hero get the presidency than Obama the anti-american who couldn’t even stand up to his racist, unpatriotic pastor. I’d rather elect a MAN who stands up for this country than the girlie man Obama.
Posted by: Jerry | May 11, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
bluebird,
I don’t go around calling people racist. Actually, i call out ANYONE i see throwing that accusation around…it’s BS. I can’t point you to munberable posts where i do that…even if it’s thrown at a Republican. It’s destroys any opportunity for dialogue. Maybe there are some Obama supporters who have labeled you such, but i would venture to say that Obama himself would NEVER make such an accusation. His campaign has been the antithesis to what JJackson and ASharpton are all about.
Calling someone a racists is a cop out, and i won’t do it. I object to your assuming i would resort to such a thing without knowing me. That is just as irresponsible as someone calling you a racist.
I’d like to know what it is about the Obama platform/candidacy you object to. I read visceral posts here regarding dislike or Obama,, but most of it does not refer to actual quantifiable issues. Is it a defensive perch you take in supporting BClinton? Is it the gas tax? What is it? Whatever it is, is it enough to cause you to vote for a guy who puts a lobbyist in charge of the Republican National Convention who lobbied for the junta in Burma? Do you dislike him that much? Do you dislike him enough to vote for someone who promises 100 more years in Iraq?
Posted by: dave | May 11, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
I have given Hillary ALOT of money and I am moving it all to McCain if Obama is my party’s nominee. They keep predicting we’ll unite? No we won’t. Not a single Hillary supporter here in FLA that I know will vote for him. He dissed FLA and now FLA will diss him. Didn’t want my vote to count, so now he won’t get my vote.
Posted by: Lorraine | May 11, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Posted by: Beth | May 11, 2008 10:47:33 PM
whoa!!! nicely said1
Posted by: rrt | May 11, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Dave:
Obama NEVER says anything about race to anyone…. He doesn’t have to.
He has his posters do the dirty work for him… after all, he IS the teflon man. They were the ones in the beginning who brought the race card out… from South Carolina right on down the line.
They blamed Bill Clinton, one of their staunchest supporters, for putting it into play! Except that it was a flagrant lie, it was a brilliant move on the part of B O…and the black Joker has been kept in play ever since!
His posters have dredged up every bit of crap they could come up with ….. from the little blue dress to her use of pant suits to the donations the Clintons make to their foundation.
They neglect carrying that topic further because it would show how magnificently charitable the Clintons have been to this country!
His followers are the bigots… not Hillary or her followers. They were the ones who voted in blocks of 92% and 91% for their leader. How could this not be considered racist!
Some whites were in the mix… just as some blacks are strong for Hillary…. and all these are the blessed ones for, either way, they obviously used their Minds to come to a decision.
What will happens during the next election? Latinos have a lot of growth and citizenship bestowed upon many because of their American born children will strengthen their voting rights even more.
Will the next election require that a Latino become president?
Must an Asian follow the Latino?
Possibilities…. but shouldn’t they be required to be meet some sort of STANDARDS?
Like patriotism, proven service to our country, brilliance and the ability to think on one’s feet?
In any case, the accomplishments Hillary has brought to this country ahave been ignored and all attention by these posters have been re-focused on stuff for which she was unaccountable for and for which she has suffered.
They did this while B O Plenty was travelling the 57 (my! how we’ve grown!) states of the union in search of his throne.
They did this while B O was sticking up
for Pastor Wright and throwing his white grandmama under the bus. I can still see him being almost suffocated by about eight enormous American flags has he preached his race speech to America and the world!
They did this the second time, some weeks later, while B O was “dissing” pastor Wright and throwing HIM under the bus.
We thought this was rather twofaced… but the mediocre media absorbed it all into its predetermined plot to take him on his soar to Washington…. as if this were just a fairy tale to be taped in Hollywood and sold to Loews.
And the brilliance and accomplishments of Hillary were ignored .. not only by B O’s oftimes foul-mouthed followers but also by the members or the press.
Obama’s slogan is “change”.His cousin Raila Odinga who he supported both financially and politically during his recent bloody struggle for power in Kenya, ran under “Agent for Change” and George Bush also ran for “Change”.
So far, the only change I see in this election is one which might lead us back to the mid=-fifties.
Be careful who you vote for.
Be very very careful.
I’m for Hillary, and I approve this message!
Posted by: questioner | May 12, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
It was shocking to read that BO in a rally early this year, said to people that they experienced the light coming down on them and that’s epiphany and if they didn’t know what to do just walk out and go vote for OB.
Then I noticed that the OB supporters were very agressive. So I thought there was something wrong. If this man is so godly then the supporters cannot express so much hate towards HC. It came to my mind that it looks closer to magic than to a real godly experience of goodness.
It was reported (there was an article in New York Times in february I think) that lots of people were depressed after attending a BO rally and some of them had to see a therapist. Even though they still felt they were deeply connected to him.
I suggest to people who don’t believe in him not to mention his name fully because magic can be done in such a way to invest a name with such energy to attract all kind of approval towards the person behind the name and therefore blind the judgement of voters.
I feel there is something that does not look and sound right to me. It has been said that he is a brilliant speaker. In debates with HC he didn’t have a smooth breathing and didn’t outmatch her. Worse, he even looked like he didn’t have a vision.
I suggest not to mention his name fully so not to activate the power of it.
Posted by: jane | May 12, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am
McCain is at least a fighter, a man of honour.
This man ducks, bluffs, shuts on people of millions, do not respect nobody. He is not the type of person you may call dependable; a con man.
FACTCHECK has been telling us this guy is being negative and lies in making false accusations. That is his smearing technique which has been so far. Now his target is McCain.
The paid hands on the internet for this guy never quits doctoring credential and making fouls. He is not a person of integrity. By comparison, Hillary is honestly fighting for the nomination with guts and hard work.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 12, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am
It gives me great pleasure to see BO’s poll rating going down and down and Jim Clyburn’s face burning red and green.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 12, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am
questioner, great post!
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 12, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
I have an idea that may just work … since BHO cannot win the swing states such as OH, PA and Bubbaland such WV….have Dean and Pelosi persuade him to drop out of the race NOW, concede and accept a VEEP spot on Clinton ticket…then the campaign deficit thing will also go away. The best exit strategy for the situation the DEMS right now. No squabble this Summer at the Convention.
Posted by: csquan | May 12, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
…delegates maths ….and FL and MI will go away too … then Dean and Pelosi sleep better tonight
Posted by: csquan | May 12, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
I can see a scenario where Clinton closes the gap and gets within 100 pledged delegates and ahead in popular vote without FL and MI. Isn’t that what the Clinton team have been saying all along?
Oh that’s right Obama’s talking points have become reality…it really is supposed to be a nomination “given” to whoever is ahead….and forget about FL and MI
Posted by: Jackie | May 12, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Hillary Supporters! Keep praying! A huge win in WV could start the delgates, MI, Fl, Edwards endorsements, Guam truth and more! If we unite in prayer it will work! Thanks!
Posted by: jeep395 | May 12, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Obama made a huge tactical error by not campaigning in WV(him stopping there the day before the primary is not that all helpful either). Of course Hillary is gone but losing to her by over 20 points when he is the nominee is not good and just proves Hillary right. Imagine if Ron Paul beat McCain in Pennsylvania or any other primary after he clinched the nomination. Yes its true some Republicans are still voting for Huckabee and Paul but they are not making McCain lose states by 20 points now are they. Seriously Obama you should of campaigned vigoriously in WV you would of closed the gap and you would of ended it for Hillary now she will stay in until June 3 guarenteed once again Obama can’t close the deal even when everyone is saying he is the nominee. Obama I want you to win but dude you need to step up and end this.
Posted by: Gonzalo | May 12, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm