McCain Breaks Sharply from Bush on Environment
ABC News’ Ron Claiborne Reports: Campaigning in the Pacific Northwest, presumptive Republican nominee John McCain, R-Ariz., broke sharply from the Bush administration on climate change, calling for urgent steps to confront its threat and saying that as president he "will not shirk the mantle of leadership" on the issue.
In an implicit rebuke to the Bush administration, McCain said at the Vestas Wind Energy Training Facility in Portland, Oregon. "I will not shirk the mantle of leadership that the United States bears. I will not permit eight long years to pass without serious action on serious challenges." Referring to the Kyoto Protocols on greenhouse gas emissions the U.S. never signed, McCain added, "I will not accept the same dead-end of failed diplomacy that claimed Kyoto."
"We stand warned by serious and credible scientists across the world that time is short and the dangers are great," McCain said. ""The most relevant question now is whether our own government is equal to the challenge."
McCain proposed a "cap-and-trade" system that sets overall limits on domestic greenhouse gas emissions and allows companies with low emissions to sell their credits to companies that fail to meet their benchmarks. He called for capping total U.S emissions nationwide at 2005 levels by the year 2012, at 1990 levels by 2020, with the aim of cutting emissions by 2050 by at least 60 percent of the 1990 levels. He does not mention mandating higher fuel efficiency levels for vehicles.
McCain also favors increasing reliance on nuclear power.
"It doesn’t take a leap in logic to conclude that if we want to arrest global warming, then nuclear energy is a powerful allow in that cause," he said.
This week, McCain is embarking on a series of environmental-themed campaign events. McCain advisers say it is a way to distinguish himself from President Bush. Charles Black, a senior aide to McCain, noted that climate change is an issue is of particular importance to younger voters, a group among whom Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill, has done well in the Democratic primaries. As the the Democrats continue to attack McCain as offering what amounts to a third Bush term, the McCain campaign says the Arizona Republican will stepping up efforts to highlight his differences with the president, including talking frequently about environmental issues.
During his presidential quest, McCain has spoken out often on climate change. He was one of the only Republican candidates do so and was the most forceful GOP contender to talk about the issue. In 2003, he sponsored the first bill calling for mandatory reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
McCain has indicated he may support legislation sponsored by Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Ind-Conn., and Sen. John Warner, R-Va, that would mandate a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to 70 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-New York, support the Lieberman-Warner bill, but have called for even greater reductions, to 80 percent below 1990 levels by mid-century.
Despite having been outspoken on the issue of climate change for years, McCain earned only a 24 (out of 100) lifetime rating by the League of Conservation Voters. He received a 0 score for 2007 because he failed to vote on any of what the LCV considered important environmental legislation.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Ah good job John, lets see the John of campaigns past. I like a maverick and you will be our next president. Since the the DNC chose to destroy Hillary you are the next best person we can vote for, I will.
Posted by: HP Boston | May 12, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
LOL
yea mccain is way better, i cant wait to spend 600 zillion trillion more dollars in Iraq for oil, and countless lives…
yup go vote mccain buddy…
lol
you sure are smart
Posted by: bhrandon | May 12, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
A big “0″ for 2007 on environmental issues for mc-more-war. I can understand why he wants to distance himself from the rest of the GOP who claim global warming is just a cyclical thing. Does an OLD guy like him really care about what happens in 2050? Obama 2008!
Posted by: pt | May 12, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Today McCain, is to acknowledge that President Bush has been, you know kinda sorta ineffective at responsible environmental policy. While he, McCain, would promise not to suck if elected.
This is just an acknowledgement of the patently obvious and hardly qualifies as a rebuke, at this point. But this is a change from the current administration.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 12, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Kudos to him for some common sense, he will need to keep this up if he hopes to win.
Posted by: MIguy | May 12, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Josh – What’s the difference between bhrando and rat boy? Sound the same to me. Full of themselves and Bo.
Posted by: fool | May 12, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Well, it certainly seems we ARE doing something about global warming now. We have taken much of the world’s food crop and converted into ethanol which only provides maybe only 3% of the world’s oil. As a result we have a world hunger crisis.
Isn’t it ironic. In an attempt to re-engineer the climate, we actually created the very situation the activists said global warming would create.
Posted by: marco123 | May 12, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Good for him. Still not going to vote for him but at least I know that no matter who wins, someone will finally begin to address this crisis.
Posted by: TSnow27604 | May 12, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
It will be interesting to see how far McCain will distance himself from the Bush Administration across the board – the war, economy, social issues, immigration reform, etc – without further alienating his Conservative base. Can he win without his base, hmmmm? The McCain and Obama campaigns will conduct their “elevated” policy discussions in those town hall meeting TBD, while their respective surrogates and 527s RIP into each other’s candidate.
Posted by: mariann | May 12, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
I luv the fact that the GOP has suddenly forgot about all the harm Bush and Cheney has done to this country. REmember this when it comes time to vote. The GOP had Congress and the record show the lies, crime, greed and Bush will pay some day. Lets start with more of the Same with McCain. He is turning the Right talkshow into crazies, because they don’t support his opposite views. Stick with the Bush agenda GOPs…more of the same with McCain
Posted by: ck | May 12, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
“It’s sad when your own party doesn’t fully support you.”
Then Obama must be the saddest of the sad right.
Posted by: geevill | May 12, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
John McCain is my second choice after Hillary Clinton for President. Choosing a qualified woman as his running mate would be an added bonus. I remember the nasty way he was treated by the Bush campaign when he ran against Bush so I’m not fearful that his Presidency will be the same as that of Bush. He’ll probaly clean House when he’s elected.
Posted by: CollegeEducatedLatteDrinker | May 12, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
It amazes me that racism has vanished from conscious published thought during this contest.
If Obama loses it is not likely to be because he is less “qualified”.
Anybody want to be honest and weigh in on this?
Posted by: ronwel | May 12, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
No one with two brain cells and capable for their own governance still believes the hoax of man-made global warming;
U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007
And this idiocy that Juan drools about disturbing “pristine land” to rid ourselves of our dependence on terrorist oil by utilizing the technology we now have to keep a small footprint in drilling is nothing less than insanity.
Just Vote None Of The Above!!
Posted by: Winghunter | May 12, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
At last! A candidate who is depoliticizing a technical subject. And allowing activists in both parties in Congress to get credit.
That’s the difference between talking about “bringing us together” and acting by giving respect to all parties so they will really come together. And on a subject that is a slam dunk to all but those who want to use it for vote getting.
Posted by: Tom Mariner | May 12, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
McCain will be the next President of the United States.
If Hillary loses the nomination, her supporters will vote for McCain. If Hillary runs as an Independent, her supporters will vote for her and split the Dems down the middle. There is NO WAY in Hades that Obama will win the nomination. He and his supporters need to face the facts, it’s either Hillary or McCain……Obama might as well give up. Hillary or McCain 08! NOBAMA !
Posted by: david from texas | May 12, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
An honest reply to Ronwel.
Racism never should have been a part of any discussion of candidates any more than gender or age should be. All should stay gone from now on.
But of course if Senator Obama loses it will be because he is less qualified! All three candidatess backgrounds have little executive experience (which is why the predominance of recent Presidents have been governors) but some have more Federal experience than others.
Posted by: Tom Mariner | May 12, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
This clown can’t have it both ways. Last week, he was insisting that yes, he voted for Bush. This week, he want’s us to believe that he is an environmentalist. Go home, John. They’re showing “Matlock” reruns on cable.
Posted by: Diggy Zazz | May 12, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Global temperatures have been falling since 1997.
The level of sunspot activity last year dropped to zero; the new 11-year sunspot cycle has failed to start. The last time this happened was the Maunder Sunspot Minimum (1645-1715) and was called the Little Ice Age.
Posted by: Gideon7 | May 12, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
David in Texas, you lost ALL credibility when you stated “There is NO WAY in Hades that Obama will win the nomination.”
Posted by: DennisNC | May 12, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
First on McCain’s voting record on the environment people need to look at his record. His lifetime rating from the League of Conservation Voters is a dismal 24 percent, and he’s generally more likely to side with miners, developers, and loggers than the EPA. Then he also just traded off prime National lands in Arizona for used up farm lands. The trade will benefit a lobbyist supporter of McCain and cost the state millions and create a water shortage in the area. From the “McCain Pushed Land Swap That Helps Backer”
Washington Post…”the public would not receive fair value” for its land. A formal appraisal has not yet begun. A town official opposed to the swap said other Yavapai Ranch land sold nine years ago for about $2,000 per acre, while some of the prime commercial land near a parcel that the developers will get has brought as much as $120,000 per acre.
The “straight talk express”!?!?
Posted by: What? | May 12, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
He better get as far away from BUSH as he can and fast…BUSH is the KISS OF DEATH for the GOP..He is the lowest scum on the face of the earth.
Posted by: Pat | May 12, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Oh boy! I hope that this does not hurt Johns chances, everyone just loves President Bushs enviromental policies.
Posted by: Jujubee Jones | May 12, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
What? 2:28 … You are correct in that McCain is smart to select issues that make him look better. Progress Punch gives him ca. a 27 rating on his environmnetal votes in general, and a 55 rating on global warming, specifically. Obama and Clinton have 92+ ratings on their enviromental voting records.
Posted by: DennisNC | May 12, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Wouldn’t it be nice if “global warming” was actually discussed, analyzed and/or proven/disproven by actual scientists instead of “environmentalists”,… where did these people get their degrees anyway,… business college,… on-line diploma factories? The most important part of the scientific method is independently confirmed experimental proof. They have none. Its an opinion, a beleif, and like all beliefs, should never be used to destroy a culture, imprison people, destroy wealth, or justify wars,… oh, wait, that’s what religion is for,… maybe the enviro-nazi’s should have themselves declared a religion, then they’d be protected. Until then, vote AGAINST ANYBODY who buys the lie.
Posted by: Gailen | May 12, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
To those of you who mistakenly label McCain a “NeoConservative” or a “NeoCon”, you couldn’t be more wrong. McCain tends to drift towards the liberal viewpoint on most issues. The man is actually what I’d consider a traditional Democrat, rather than the pond scum socialists like Obama that have polluted and corrupted your once semi-honorable party. May socialism die an early death!
Posted by: Michael | May 12, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
I’m voting for McCain since I just love punishment. Yeah, nothing like a 100 year war, trillions and trillions down a bottomless pit, more and more soldiers dying, total destruction of the economy, paying 20 bucks for a gallon of gas, waiting for the ship to come from overseas because nothing gets made here anymore, health care for the rich, and people everywhere losing their homes. Yeah, a vote for McCain is a vote for McPain.
Posted by: Jake | May 12, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Good for McCain. This is one area he hasn’t flip-flopped on as of yet, but we also remember Bush declaring in 2000 that he would sign Kyoto. Still, McCain has a solid track record on support for global warming mitigation and it’s good to see politicians on both sides with their heads not in the sand on science.
Posted by: NewYorkJ | May 12, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
McCain may be good, let’s just hope he doesn’t forget where he is, what he said, where he was going. In other words can we live with all those “McCain Moments”?
McCain is no maverick, never was. Now he is simply a old relic from the past, like Nader, that refuses to go away, like Hillary!
Does any one really think he has a chance? Come on, who wants 8 more years of a republican in the white house. NOT gonna happen!
Posted by: IndieVisible | May 12, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
This “environmental ” rhetoric from Mccain looks like an attempt to win over some Democrats, and nothing more. McCain can make all the promises he wants about the environment, and then never come through on any of them. What most Americans are concerned about the most is the lousy economy’s effect on the middle class, and the money and lives being lost in the idiotic Iraq war.
Posted by: Tom | May 12, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
NewYork, McCain has a good tract on global warming for a Republican. His voting record is not too bad, but hardly a strong one either.
Posted by: DennisNC | May 12, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
And dont forget that McCain said he wants more justices like Roberts and Alito. These guys will always rule against the people in thier decisions. Like the no knock warrent searches and allowing the use of illegally obtained evidence for prosecution.
Posted by: Not Your Average Joe | May 12, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Wow, there are some pretty bad comments about all three presidential candidates. The only reason Hillary is being given such a rough time is the long-standing hate campaign against women…it began so long ago with the editing of the Bible, got worse during the time of James I of England, with some more Bible editing and a whole lot of witch burnings, and continued through the 20th century, finally women got to vote (keep in mind black male voters got that right first, though it was not necessarily de facto..)and now Hillary is being denegrated almost like a “witch.” White male persecutors will get theirs own day…I hope it’s this November!
Posted by: mademoisellebelle33 | May 12, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
if he would break from bush on the war and on tax cuts for the wealthy he would win this fall but he wont so he will lose . america wants the war over and wants the rich to pay there fair share.
Posted by: tom | May 12, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
McCains only chance to win is to distance himself from Bush. In the end it all comes down to the numbers.
The war in Iraq, the stock market is down, unemployment is up, the national deficit is rising, our infrastructure is crumbling, and the dollar is falling.
Obveiously the policys implimented during the Bush administration have not been succesfull.
Posted by: Rob | May 12, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Questions to McCain and Obama per below:
Questions for McCain [Iain Murray]
On his energy/climate policy, George Will has two great questions:
• You say that even if global warming turns out to be no crisis (the World Meteorological Organization says global temperatures have not risen in a decade), even unnecessary measures taken to combat it will be beneficial because “then all we’ve done is give our kids a cleaner world.” But what of the trillions of dollars those measures will cost in direct expenditures and diminished economic growth—hence diminished medical research, cultural investment, etc.? Given that Earth is always warming or cooling, what is its proper temperature, and how do you know?
• You propose a “cap and trade” system to limit the carbon dioxide that many companies can emit. Is not your idea an energy- rationing proposal akin to Bill Clinton’s BTU tax?
I’ll be adding a few thoughts later on Planet Gore, but these form a good starter for ten. If any answers are forthcoming, they should illuminate much of the rest of the presumptive nominee’s approach to the economy.
Posted by: sally | May 12, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Sally, I agree, the world’s temperature has not risen since 1998 and recently a group of renowned climatologists indicated that the world will be cooling over the next ten to twelve years. So why all the fuss? Especially since all the money going to solve a non problem could be better spent elsewhere solving real problems.
Posted by: Indy | May 12, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Is McCain in the pocket of OPEC? I ask this since it is more harmful to the environment to ship oil overseas as compared to using modern environmentally friendly drilling methods to get oil here. Shipping oil overseas has already caused a lot of damage due to oil spills. So, again, why is McCain against drilling for oil here since he is supposed to be the security candidate and interested in protecting the environment. Just wondering. Same goes for Obama by the way except Obama may not care as much about security.
Posted by: Tim | May 12, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
the further mccain seperates himself from bush the better, in fact if mccain said he will end the war and reinstate the normal tax code for the ultra rich and make them pay there fair share,mccain would have a 50-50 chance of winning,but if he keeps the war crap and tax cuts for the rich he will lose by 30% or more .
Posted by: tom | May 12, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
McCain should stand up for what he believes. I will still write in Ron Paul, but whoever comes out of this mess, I pray that they can make the best choices in the interests of all Americans, not just the few that have contributed to them and bought their favor.
Posted by: huh | May 12, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Was McCain reading from Senator Obama’s website on the global warming issue? He shouldn’t plagiarize like that
Posted by: 1masterstroke | May 13, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
Has anyone noticed that the press (Yahoo in particular) is trying to control this presidential race? They want Obama to win. We do have freedom of speech but I always thought that the press should be unbiased. A few months ago when I opened up Yahoo there would be a negative headline about Hillary. Now it’s about McCain. Just an observation.
Posted by: Sue | May 13, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am
Sue, I totally agree with you. I have never seen the media so biased toward Obama. He is basically an “empty suit” and there will be a LOT of his supporters very dissappointed in the General Election when he loses…that is, if he is the Democratic nominee. I’ve been reading the news story and for some reason, I feel that something BIG is about to break, something that will bring Obama down. I wouldn’t count Clinton out as some are doing. Obama played the “race” card and has divided this country, he will never win the GE and this will come back to haunt him. I certainly feel that McCain will be the next President……if Obama thought Clinton was tough, he hasn’t seen anything yet when the GOP gets hold of him. He will be crying like a little baby. Nobama 08!
Posted by: jack | May 13, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
So McBush is now trying to distance himself from his buddy George. Too little, too late.
Posted by: PhilBgood | May 13, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
I have always been a Democrat, but as I get older (37) I question their policies. The more government that we have, the more inefficiency and waste we have as well. Socializing healthcare will only make things worse…costs will go up, fraud will be out of control just like the guy I saw the other day trying to buy a TON of cooked crab meat from the Deli. Of course he was unable to do so, but what is that guy doing with a food card to begin with? I see so many illegals where I live who are on the WIC program and food stamps. What is going on in this country? I have long felt that the Dems are pandering to the Hispanic community and are not tough on this issue.
I do not want MORE social programs like Obama proposes. He wants to pay for them by ending the Iraq War. He has already spent money that is not even available. Besides, that money will be necessary to keep our military going, especially with what is happening in Afghanistan and other unstable regions, not to mention Obama’s admission that we would need to keep at least 100,000 troops in Iraq. Double the capital gains tax, which experts agree that it does not actually increase real tax revenue. Let’s tax businesses more so that they can pass that cost on to the consumer. Give thousands of dollars in tax breaks to help with college tuition. It all sounds good, but HOW will it be paid for considering our national debt is like nothing ever before seen.
We all agree that some companies, especially oil, are profiting excessively. Raising taxes is not the answer, there need to be other measures in place. Why is natural gas regulated in our country? Electricity? Oil is the ultimate currency and affects the price of everything.
If anyone can work with other politicians to solve this problem it is McCain. Sure he has made mistakes, but who hasn’t? I trust McCain to do what is right for America. He is the best person to bring about real positive change in this country, not just talk about it while the ultra left liberal pull your strings.
Posted by: memyselfandI | May 13, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Wow–what a bunch of fluff! Scary. We have a president that could care less about global warming or the environment in general–as long as his oil buddies are kicking *$&. Now we’ve got an R in the same boat but actually ‘gets it’ in terms of ‘marketing’ the environmental concerns of many voters. That scares me–because it’s all a bunch of greenwashing BS.
Posted by: hebegb | May 13, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Gaffney,
My last comment was in response to your post, not dncsucks.
Posted by: NewYorkJ | May 13, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
The global warming zealots and it’s followers get away with spewing garbage science. The people that benefit the most from spewing this global warming rubbish are the scientists looking for their next big grant and from politicians searching for the next excuse to bully, tax and interfere in our lives.
The news media compounds the lies by looking for anything to fill their 24 hour, wall to wall breaking news coverage. Remember the milennium bug anyone? Or how about mad cow disease that had thousands of us dropping like, well…cows. Not to mention SARS and now bird flu.
Still, it gives Obama and McCain something to campaign on. Pretend to save the planet by dreaming up new green taxes then creating entire new departments with thousands of civil servants that the tax payers are forced to pay for. Worse yet is that if Obama’s or McCain’s policies are implemented all of our jobs will be chased away to Nations with lower energy costs and fewer regulations, ie China. In the meantime, just look at Europe for a model of what happens when Obama’s or McCain’s policies are enacted where green house gases actually went up, not down and Europe lost jobs to the US. Guess, Obama and MccCain want the US to go down the tubes with a Global Warming policy that will not do anything to stop global warming, just give Obama or McCain more power over our lives while all of our jobs go bye bye.
Posted by: Jim | May 13, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Simpson,
The European economy is actually outpacing the U.S. at this time. It’s also a shot in the dark to tie any job losses to specific policies. Global warming mitigation will actually create many new jobs in the renewable and possibly nuclear sector.
A total of an 11% increase over 20 years time is very small and manageable, considering the major environmental and national security benefits down the road (not just global warming). Proposals also include an energy rebate for low-income workers.
You also said:
“Also, what about the cost of gasoline and the impact it will have on the overall economy if it continues to go up? ”
That’s all the more reason to push for this type of legislation. Cap and trade policies will create a powerful market incentive to gradually move away from fossil-fuel-based energy, minimizing the impacts of likely continued increases in oil and gas as we approach Peak Oil. Those who don’t accept the virtual scientific consensus on global warming (in reality a long-term problem) should at least acknowledge a variety of other benefits attributed to these types of policies.
Posted by: NewYorkJ | May 13, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Simpson,
You’re not seriously quoting SPPI and Lord Monckton? Independent and non-partisan analysis is what we’re after. The EIA at least meets this qualification.
Posted by: NewYorkJ | May 13, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
We’re not buying it, McCain. You can’t tow the GOP line on every single political issue from immigration to torture to Bush tax cuts to the Iraq war and expect us to still buy the MSM BS that you are a “maverick.”
To those who still have their head in the sand regarding the anthropogenic causes of global warming, over thirty scientific societies and academies of science all agree on this issue. This includes all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.
While individual scientists have voiced disagreement with some findings of the IPCC, the overwhelming majority of scientists working on climate change agree with their main conclusions.
Posted by: TXCourtney | May 13, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
If we want to keep our freedom there is no one more experenced and
understanding of what it takes as John McCain.
Posted by: John D. Wolf | June 8, 2008, 5:14 am 5:14 am
John McCain?? hell NO. He is a Bush’s junior, who vowed to keep troops in Iraq for another 100 hundred years or longer? This is an insane thinking of McCain. McCain and Bush both are the same careless about the troops and troops’ families. I don’t know what the heck people are thinking. Didn’t Bush ruin the country enough for the last 8 years? and now they wanted to vote for McCain, a mini mini me Bush? People who are voting for John McCain are stupid, dumb, and irresponsible for America next generation. I don’t mind for a few more terms of Clinton. Lot of people criticized Bill Clinton for the sex scandal, but who don’t like sex. Lot of senators who criticized Bill Clinton at the end turned out even worse than Bill. Since a lot of idiots out there still hooked into the old time who don’t want to be lead by a woman (Mrs. Clinton) then the only best one we have right now is Mr. Obama. Time for us to change let the Republican knows that they have caused enough damages to the country and no longer be trusted by American.
Posted by: AZKen | June 10, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
I don’t feel as I can trust the McCain party haven’t gain my trust about his issues about pro-life because to many babies of proverty and low income families don’t even get chance to live so if there were so much concern about this issues why do there be so many funeral for the lower class teenagers. They child have a right to live to it shouldn’t be they choose another need in life instead of going to the doctor for they cannot afford health insurance.
Posted by: LOU | September 5, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am