Obama: Bush, McCain Should ‘Explain Why They Have a Problem With JFK’
ABC News Sunlen Miller reports: Sen. Barack Obama went one step further today in his pushback against presumptive GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain and President Bush on appeasement, suggesting that both Republicans have a problem with presidents past who have engaged in direct diplomacy.
"If George Bush and John McCain have a problem with direct diplomacy, led by the president of the United States, then they can explain why they have a problem with John F. Kennedy because that’s what he did with [Soviet leader Nikita] Khrushchev, or Ronald Reagan, ’cause that’s what he did with [Soviet leader Mikhail] Gorbachev, or Richard Nixon ’cause that’s what they did with [Chinese leader Mao Tse-tung]," Obama said in Roseburg, Ore. "That’s exactly the kind of diplomacy we need to keep us safe."
Obama called the dust-up "appealing," after Bush said in Israel at the Knesset that it was a mistake to talk about diplomacy with "terrorists and radicals."
"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," Bush said. "We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is –- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."
Obama also blasted McCain’s healthcare proposals during a town-hall meeting.
"Essentially his plan is we’re gonna dismantle the employer-based system and give everybody a tax break and then see if you can fend for yourself in the marketplace," Obama told the crowd. "He wants to give you the failed Bush health-care polices for another four years."
Obama has been increasing the frequency of his criticisms of McCain, pointing out the contrasts in their views on national security, the economy, the rural agenda, and now health care.
The McCain campaign fired back at the Democrat after the remarks.
"Offering the current Iranian regime an unconditional summit and the status of a super power akin to the Soviets, as Barack Obama has suggested, shows incredibly weak judgment and a dangerous lack of experience," McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds said.
Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
Obama’s pathetic knowledge of past talks between nations, is truly frightening. Kennedy and Reagan OPENED TALKS WITH nations thru proper channels, NOT MERELY TALKS AT, WITHOUT CERTAINTY THAT THERE WAS AN AGENDA AND A BASIS FOR DISCUSSION. Wild accusations are equally dangerous, and foment even more distrust. Who is advising Obama, and what are their credentials? I speak as someone who studied International Relations on the graduate level at Tufts University!!!
Posted by: Virginia | May 17, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Obama is NOT Kennedy. Obama is not Reagan. If he were either one, I might vote for him. Talking to your enemies and standing around the campfire holding hands and singing Kumbaya are two different things. He wants to have the Castros to the White House for tea, without them making any adjustments to their so called human rights practices. If Obama wants to compare himself to Kennedy, he needs to take note of how Kennedy dealt with Castro.
Posted by: Melanie | May 17, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Both Bush and McCain are wrong on every issue. McCain is trying to change his true colors into something he thinks will fool everyone. McCain’s true platform is Bush’s all over again, no one is fooled by this new McCain talk.
Posted by: Lookup | May 17, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
AMERICA-FIRST Great Post!! I am disgusted with Obama and the Democratic leaders who want him as the nominee! Everytime Obama makes a mistake, his so-call supporters keep bailing him out rather than looking at the real issue—Obama is an inexperienced, slick-talking racist/hate mongul who is bad news for this Country!! This whole primary season has been flawed and corrupt! Obama has bought the nomination but hopefully will be stopped before he is elected to the Presidency!! I will never vote for Obama and will actively campaign to keep him and other Democratic leaders who support him out of office!!
Posted by: debbie | May 17, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Not talking is a sign of weakness. Our president should stop showing such fear. The not talking policy is a total failure. Iran continues to march toward nukes and Bush has been totally ineffective in stopping them.
Posted by: Don | May 17, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
debbie you are another version of the kind of people that make America less than it should be. I would hope the government tracks your ip addresses because you make me feel uncomfortable with people who think like you guys do>?? Ask Pat Tillman’s mother how she feels about the political game that is going on these days.
Posted by: Lou | May 17, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
I haven’t seen where the Bush, Hagee policy has gained us anything.
Posted by: Thinking | May 17, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Lou
You must related to Obama’s wife since you have so much hate for anyone who questions Obama and his abilities.
Posted by: Debbie | May 17, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I would like to see this guy go one day keeping his yapper shut, he is worse a certain gender that shall remain nameless. He is such a hypocrite, claiming everyone else is ‘attacking’; while he is the one attacking, slamming, vilifying. God help this country should this ‘dude’ get elected. He will have something to say every minute of every day; none of it substantive.
Posted by: therockofages | May 17, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Does Obama realize that the Russians or Chinese did not attack us?
Posted by: LynnS | May 17, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
McCain and Bush are both wrong. Since they don’t have anything good to say about themselves the only thing they can do is to try and knock down their opponents with dumb remarks.
Posted by: con me not | May 17, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
You guys are losing perspective on what’s going on. It’s simpler than all of that… He is mentioning JFK today because news came out about the health of Ted Kennedy. Some people maybe emotional about it and he is trying to capitalize on it. Why didn’t he mention JFK yesterday, or before? Wake-up, sleepy heads… He will have the right speech for every problem that our country faces. That’s how things will change in Washington.
Posted by: Robin | May 17, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Serioulsy, As much as I hate Iran, but who’s stupid enough to believe that talking with Iran is some how some way more dangerous than talking and dealing with the soviets … The soviets were far more dangerous when Kennedy and Reagans dealwith them… USSR was the only country that could obliterate us…
Iran doesn’t even have nukes to begin with…
So what if Obama talks to Iran ?
Do you think they can destroy us ???
Some people are more scared of Iran, than the soviets now ?
Iranians don’t even have the army to compare with us…
People seem to make a HUGE deal, like if Iranians could attack us…
Republicans are such wimps…
Posted by: ambro23 | May 17, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
The Bush/McCain war policy has led us to deep debt and we are now a nation that is less secure as a result of their unwise use of our military and financial assets. I would have voted for McCain 8 years ago because I thought he was somewhat independent and trustworthy. His personal ambition to be President seems to have taken over in subsequent years. Now his flip flops to suit the immediate and his fairly consistant hypocrisy have left his “straight talk” image far behind. McCain offers more of the same at a time when we need real change.
Posted by: Earth | May 17, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Talk to not “appease”.
*Obama 2008*
Posted by: Kicking Booty | May 17, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
LynnS, Do you realize that Iran hasn’t attacked us either?
Posted by: amy | May 17, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Sometimes we have to take a calculated risk to effect calculated changes. With Obama, yes, I agree, he’s a relative newbie to the political scene; however, sometimes the newest face brings the freshest ideas. I’m tired of politicians saying and doing the same old, same old, and then getting the same bad results each time. I’m totally for Obama, and I’m a female and I’m Jewish and I have relatives in Israel and they are NOT worried about Obama. In fact they mentioned to me that maybe someone who is not afraid to talk to those people may have a positive effect for their country.
Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 17, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
continued
Posted by: Bonnie | May 17, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
I am flabbergasted with this heated discussion and people not realizing that the theme of JFK appeared in Obama’s campaign the day when news came out that Ted Kennedy was hospitalized. I don’t buy that’s a coincidence. Folks, we need a president not a talk box.
Posted by: Robin | May 17, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Up to now Obama has had a soft ride. Wait until the big test comes when he will have to answer to his past such as his autobiography he wrote in 1996 where you get the feeling that he was a man with a huge chip on his shoulder.
Also, he is very clever at ducking issues and blaming others. Does he actually have an organized plan.
His handlers are very astute when it comes to marketing their candidate-perception in politics is everything,
Posted by: Norm | May 17, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
More than the lack of logical commentary that is riddled with racist undertone, what is disturbing is that so much of it comes from women! How come so many American women are filled with such racial anger? Very disturbing…
Posted by: anastassia27 | May 17, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I see the Obama kool-aid drinkers are out in full force tonight. Anything that Obama says is 100% correct and anyone who questions him is a racist! Obama is weak just like Jimmy Carter was with Iran and the hostage situation. No I don’t agree with Bush on the Iraq War, but I do not agree with Obama and his approach to negotiating with terrorist groups. Obama can lie his way out of this again like he does when he gets heat–he did say he would negotiate with terrorist groups in several debates and on some news programs. His tactics of turning the tables around by attacking others when he is questioned on an issue shows he has weak leadership qualities! He attacks others rather than taking a stand and answering the question.
Posted by: Debbie | May 17, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Not to be silly and rain on the parade of fundamentalists, but…
Why do you have to be an Obama supporter to believe in talking to Iran? Obama is right–we have ALWAYS talked to other nations, even those diametrically opposed to us politically. Keeping communications channels open makes it easier to avoid accidents, it keeps insurgencies from turning into nuclear war, etc.
Bush is not conservative–he is a fundamentalist and sees things only in black and white. That’s dangerous because it means he assumes anyone not agreeing with him wholly is wrong/evil and fails to take into account other perspectives.
War is politics by other means. Politics is about discussion/agreement on how to divide resources of all sorts.
…but fundamentalists don’t want to hear that–they just want to insult the other side. How many posts are there that refer to Obama, McCain, or Bush by name rather than degrading ‘nicknames’?
Exactly.
Posted by: jim | May 17, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Look Virginia don’t slander the Tufts name by using it to legitimize your views. The vast majority of Tufts students know the truth about Obama and not the lies you’re peddling here.
Posted by: Tufts Student | May 17, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
America-First is the reason I’m thinking of moving out of this country if a Republican is elected again.(S)he
scares me with their power to vote without really looking into more than the network news, tabloid headlines, and Fox News.
Posted by: Whalker | May 17, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Russia and China did not attack us. To date, neither have Iran or North Korea. And please,let’s remember who trained and armed these extremists who now hate us. If we want America to be first again, we have to start acting like the leaders we can be. Otherwise the screen name will have to be America-32nd (as we are in education and health care).
Posted by: Lauren | May 17, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
From what I’ve seen out of Obama over the past year, all he is good for is talk…it’s not a surprise that his foreign policy would be based on the same. Specifics please Mr. Obama!
Posted by: ted dee | May 17, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
What about the difference between cold war and a shooting war doesn’t Mr. Obama understand???
Posted by: Gary Ware | May 17, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
vancav,
Obama has advocated a much more aggressive policy in Afghanistan. He has obviously aggressively pushed for extracting ourselves from the stupidity of Iraq. The Iranian leadership and military love the fact that we are tied up in Iraq. The more we are occupied there, the less we can turn our attention to them and potentially punish them for digressions and the more they can essentially wage a proxy war against us by supporting Shiite militias. Vancav, you seem reasonably well-informed. Take a quick look at the other folks in this thread who are “on your side”. Choose your friends carefully — a significant percentage of them at this point seem barely literate.
Posted by: TruthAndNothingBut | May 17, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Love your country the right way!!!
Obama 2008!!!
Posted by: Beenaround | May 17, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
With due respect to Senator Obama, he should study his history a bit more before making comments about effective diplomacy. The three leaders and their respected countries did not have direct American blood on their hands. Americans forget to quickly that we lost close to 3000 patriots on 9/11. One can also argue that the real reason we went into Iraq was to draw these terrorists across the globe and let our bravest men and women fight them on their own soil rather than ours.
I rest my case.
Posted by: Eric | May 17, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Listen up, folks. Iran had precisely nothing to do with 9-11. Talking to Iran is not talking to someone with American blood on their hands.
Posted by: whovous | May 17, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Okay so now Obama wants people to think he’s JKF? By accusing others of having a problem with JFK doesn’t make you JFK. He gets more ridiculous every time he speaks.
Posted by: CLM | May 17, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
o and one more thing…acting “tough” and threatening to people who aren’t afraid to die DOES NOT WORK. it just increases the tension between governments, while the people of both nations just want to live and feed thier kids. but hey, logic has nothing to do with macho posing. i see the same thing on animal planet every night. MCCAIN ’08 AMERICA FIRST…OVER THE CLIFF!
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Turns out that Rev. Wright was RIGHT! Obama will say whatever it takes, he is a politician after all! Foolish me I had hoped he was honest, oh well what can you expect just another inexperienced know it all who really knows nothing at all. He is so sure that he is smart wonder where that comes from I don’t hear anything smart, just smart ass and biased and arrogant. Please save me from this one more knows what better for use than the rest of the country does;
Posted by: GripperDon | May 17, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I’m from Cambridge MA and I knew JFK; Senator Barack Obama you are a JFK. You are young, inspirational, have a Vision for America, appeal to the Youth and exude Hope and Progress as did JFK. Bush /McCain have a problem; neither are Public Servant material.
Posted by: Fareed | May 17, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
It is simple: once you start communicating the truth may come out…
Scary thought for some….
Posted by: Beenaround | May 17, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Mentioning JFK today serves two purposes:
a) Capitalize on the headlines that Ted Kennedy was hospitalized and some people may be emotional about it. Especially, lets play with the emotions of Oregonians who haven’t sent their ballots yet.
b) Divert the attention from the big loss that he is facing in Kentucky. BTW, while we blog here, he is running an ad in Kentucky saying that he will lose b/c of Fox news and the fact that he doesn’t have time to campaign there. Why is he campaigning now in Michigan and Florida then when he doesn’t even want them to be counted? Why isn’t Kentucky? Can any of the Obama technicians please explain… Oh, is Fox News fault… So, did he win all those red state caucuses that put him in the pledged delegate lead because of CNN and the rest of the liberal media?
How about Hillary winning all the battleground states with the media all across the political spectrum against her?
Posted by: Robin | May 17, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
There are millions of Democrats, myself included and friends, who are getting physically sick at the choice between this idiot Obama, his dangerous clique and his incomprehensibly anti-American, anti-Western minions and McCain and the Republicans. We ask each other, how can we vote for a Republican president. But then, at the end of the day, if Obama is the nominee we will vote Republican and join the millions who will flee to McCain. We can do it, and it could work with a solidly Democratic Congress. In the best of all worlds a third party will emerge in four years and it will be the authentic voice of the American people.
Posted by: JudyG, NYC | May 17, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Why don’t all you “patriots” who are dogging Obama come out and state your true objections? Could it be that racism isn’t cool?
Posted by: Jim | May 17, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Republicans!!! Did any of you spend a single day outside of US to realize what damage Bush brought to the US people? Do you want to carry on with this through McCain? Don’t do more damage to US. Bush has done so much damage that will take many many years to recover from.
Posted by: herbert | May 17, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Who died and left us in charge of the world and humanity? We call these countries terrorist while none of them have come here to commit a terrorist act. Yet, we call the Saudis our “ally” when the terrorist of 911 came from Saudia Arabia. Is there some kind of twisted logic going on here? Just as we call them terrorist, they also call us terrorist too. Who is right here? If you really want to hope to achieve peace, you have to talk to everyone, including those you don’t like. You can’t sign any kind of peace accord with anybody unless you talk to them, not rocket science. And no, we can’t bomb everybody and make them surrender. Those days are long gone.
Posted by: Jake | May 17, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
When “W” is out of office will he join the troops “and fight the good fight” or stay at home?
It’s always a great deal when its not “your” money!
Posted by: yves | May 17, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
I think the question of the moment is: What will we have to show for 8 years of Obama foreign policy?
Posted by: Tom in MA | May 17, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
The entire premise that we can punish our enemies by simply not talking to them is ridiculous in the first place. Regardless of their behavior towards us, Iran is a sovereign nation with thousands of years of history in the region- they aren’t going anywhere, and the idea that not speaking to them will somehow delegitimize their government is unrealistic and shortsighted. They are one of the key players in the region, and having diplomatic contact with them just makes sense, strategically. Communicating does not mean appeasement. Until recently this is the way that we handled regimes with interests contrary to ours- it’s only within the last eight years that this elementary-school-like “i’m not talking to you any more! nyah!” policy went into effect, along with Bush’s naive “axis of evil” black and white view of world politics. Obama is only proposing a return to normalcy, and rightly so, because what we’ve been doing since Bush took office clearly hasn’t been working, and has destroyed our reputation as a country worldwide. Bravo Obama for continuing to push smart policy regardless of whatever misleading scare tactics the neo-cons might try to use.
Posted by: Alexander | May 17, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
I am amazed at the idiots who post on here. It’s really depressing to know that this is part of the voting public. Please some of you, do the country and the world a favor, stay home on election day. Let the grown up, logical people do the voting. I’m a life long Democrat myself, a true classic liberal, I believe we need to get country back to a place of of being self sufficient and proud of what we can do, for ourselves at home and abroad. I will be the first to admit I have concerns over Mr. Obama, but him being a terrorist, or racist, or the anti-christ like some of you idiots on here are paranoid about, please get over it. He’s another politician and he is just trying to win the game at hand. Who ever wins this year is going to have a huge crapload of a mess to clean up from the last 8 years, and I wouldnt want to be in their shoes at all.
Posted by: rich | May 17, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Were Not, Reagan and Nixon also mentioned in Mr. Obama’s responce to this “sad” display from Mr. Bush.and Mr. McCain? Funny how some people, and the media sees exactly what they choose to see, regardless of the facts. I leave it to you!
Posted by: We The People | May 17, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Lets see we stopped talking to Iraq because they wouldn’t come clean with the WMD they didn’t have. 5 years on we are still fighting, and now we seem to be on the brink of another war with Iran, yet our real enemy is still in Pakistan, and on the brink of having a reversal of fortune in Afghanistan.
I get it the Bush policy is effective.
What is mwrong with you people?
Posted by: Thinking | May 17, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
I wish the “dirt” on the OBAMA scam would be released NOW, so America has 2 candidates in NOVEMBER.
WE have a right to know.
Posted by: mj | May 17, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Here Bush is going to Israel saying to us he will get a peace deal for the Middle East.
First think he says “we will not talk to our enemies”
How do you get a peace agreement then?????
Posted by: Beenaround | May 17, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Senator Obama has had NO meetings on the committee he chairs on Afghanistan. He’s all talk!!
Posted by: Debbie | May 17, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Get the facts straight. Reagan and Kennedy never, EVER sat down with terrorist states. Enemies, yes. Terrorists, NO. And yes, the war with Iraq is a big mistake because Saddam knew how to keep the barbarians in line.
Posted by: Ros | May 17, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Some of you people are horrible.Okay I agree obama as of now doesn’t look well versed in some of the snipets I see of him.He seemed more agile about a year ago, but saying that he is a terrorist….are you all serious. McCain wants war!I don’t think the countries that hate America are afraid of America. They want to obliterate us.Both McCain and Obama are sending a message to our adversaries.McCain is stubborn and hotheaded and not willing to end strife. Obviously he wants to keep us in a state of fear with all america on the edge of their seat near the brink of World war 3.If we attack another country do you honestly think that there will be no retaliation. Obama wants to entertain the POSSIBILITY of making peace with our enemies.No one said we would desrtoy our weapons or let down our defenses, but just like most relationships until productive communication is going on there will always be problems.For the sake of America and the world more war should be our last resort!And if we go to war we need more international support because we are not the only ones capable of nuking a nation.It would be stupid to think that we are invincible.Yes we need a massive effective, military and the most capable weapons of continent destroying ability, but we need to convince the world through might AND diplomacy that it is in everyones best interest that we refrain from attacking one another.I don’t know about you, but when someone wants me to do something it would be better for them to enlighten me to why I should see it their way instead of givingme an ultimatum.You get more flies with sugar than you do with _______.
Posted by: TV | May 17, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Herbert
I’ve traveled widely, When I encounter complaints from (Europe mostly) abroad it has usually been ANY complaint made against a Republican administration. Very seldom against a Democrat. I consider the source. I don’t care or support much of what Europeans complain about…Thry’re fatally liberal and they don’t have much to show for their world “leadership”
Posted by: Phil | May 17, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
The paranoid delusional lies being posted here by some people about Barrack Obama make me sick.
I take comfort however that at the end of the day, the message that is going to be heard is Obama’s and his promises– not the idiocy posted here. I will be content to think then of how your delusional ravings will be confronted by Obama’s willingness to work for your rights and betterment of your life.
Posted by: JP | May 17, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Phil,
Clearly, you have been misinformed. See, if you have ever traveled abroad, you would see that Europeans are respected by other countries. Americans? We have to hide (quick, get out the Canadian flag!). And they have plenty to show for it, with lower levels of poverty, better health, longer lifespans, improved job security, etc. What do we have to show for our current “world leadership”? A huge debt? Certainly not much in the way of results.
Posted by: mjtimber | May 17, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
What is interesting is that both candidates have very different opinions on so many subjects..Neither waffle their opinions or trade sides to appease people like Hilliary does..Let us hope Hilliary will be toast soon so we can move on.
.I truly hope our populace will quite alluding to McCain’s age or allegiance to Bush and also hope that people will ignore the color of OBAMA’s skin or his middle name.
Posted by: alonzo | May 17, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
What is interesting is that both candidates have very different opinions on so many subjects..Neither waffle their opinions or trade sides to appease people like Hilliary does..Let us hope Hilliary will be toast soon so we can move on.
.I truly hope our populace will quite alluding to McCain’s age or allegiance to Bush and also hope that people will ignore the color of OBAMA’s skin or his middle name.
Posted by: alonzo | May 17, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Comparing Iran to the Soviet Union, please Obama. Let’s try to keep it credible.
Posted by: JA | May 17, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
McCain is an extention of George Bush.We don’t need more of these failed policies! How much is gas under the current administration?We need democrats in the white house.
Obama Clinton ’08.We need leadership like FDR!
Posted by: TV | May 17, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
The human ego is an amazing thing. The truth is that all three candidates stink and most people are too immersed in ‘my candidate’ to see that there is enough dirt and politics as usual to go around for everybody. In a very real sence the media hand picked which choices we have and like obedient sheep most of us went along because we either didn’t have the knowledge or courage to do better. Think about it America: Out of a country of 300 million people is this the best that we can come up with?
Posted by: Rob | May 17, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Obama will be a great leader.
Bring on president Obama.
He will truly advance America’s position in the world.
Posted by: thomas | May 17, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Is this guy SERIOUS??? Oh Obama, please don’t tell me that you’re comparing the days of Kennedy and Reagan to now???? God help us all and God Bless AMerica!!!!
Posted by: Deb in RI | May 17, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
A lack of communicating with the Muslim world is what has brought us to this point. We as Americans do not understand the Muslim world and as with most things that are not understood, we fear them. We will never make inroads to peace without finding out what makes them tick. And we will never find that answer without actually sitting down with them and asking.
Posted by: cmac | May 17, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Lol I like this. The more he attacks the more the shape of the policies and argument for the general election moves towards the dems favor. We get away from BS like flag pins and rev wright and bill ayers and geraldine ferraro and get to substance. if we talk about foreign policy now he can strengthen his argument for the general election. but mccain wants to keep this argument because he cant say much about the economy, health care, education, or the iraq war.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
A lot of historians could probably make a case that Kenneday’s inexperience contributed to the Bay of Pigs incident.
I truly believe the Republicans will be successful in making Obama look inexperinced, lacking in judgement and unpatriotic. These are not qualities we want in a president. I have watched nurmerous local elections and the change candidates are rarely successful. Good politicians are like good teachers, good doctors, etc. -they are rare. Change for change sake seems to be what the media and the old guard in the democratic party want. At a time when our country could really benefit from experience, we decide to elect someone who will have to learn on the job. How does this benefit us?
Posted by: rafraf | May 17, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
It’s rather difficult to imagine George W. Bush engaging in meaningful diplomacy – the man has difficulty speaking in a complete sentence. And McCain. . .well, all he says is “my friend”. . .which one would think could make him more popular among his congressional colleagues. But since he has a reputation for displaying a short fuse, I can’t imagine a tantrum doing much for America’s security.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | May 17, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Funny for a nation to celebrate the destruction of the Berlin Wall, we seem hell bent on putting up others.
Put youir head up your but and maybe they will go away.
Or lets not talk with them, it will make them listen to what we have to say.
Or don’t talk with them so they can hear us.
Posted by: Thinking | May 17, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Oh puh-leeze, America First – what is it about conservatives that they are so incapable of engaging in reasonable dialogue? And then they go ballistic when they are accused of not being able to engage in diplomacy – duh.
And repeating these manufactured right-wing talking points. You know, the American people bought those lines of manure and a quick look around should give Republicans a clue as to what that crap produced. Not this time. We need some grownups running the country – not mental adolescents whose entire experience at relationships involves bullying.
Posted by: kevinbgoode | May 17, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Rational: lol you said exactly what i said. they cant do anything about the economy because they have no answer nor plan, his health care plan is worse than bushs, and he has no plan for education. this is what they want to argue about and its good its happening now. so as time goes on he can pick up on their weak spots and hit them with all of the other issues
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
God bless America. It is frightening to know that Obama might be the Commander in Chief. Obama identified himself to Bush’s appeasement remarks. Now, he is using past great leaders as an examples, but failed to mention that they are backed by the strong American Military stand. Without this strength, you have nothing to offer, except defeat. Obama is so phony and inexperience, that it is pathetic that his followers are blinded by his empty speeches. Wake up America, we need a strong leadership, Hillary or McCain.
Posted by: tigerjcs | May 17, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Obama should explain to the super delegates why West Virginia, Florida, and Pennsylvania will NOT be voting for him in the general election…then again, neither will Oklahoma, Tennessee…etc. The Dems will lose again in 2008 despite the hype…cuz that’s all it is: hype.
Posted by: Explain This | May 17, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
I don’t think I should be called a racist just because I’m not voting for Obama. Now you are the one bringing up his race to cause guilt! I think he is an inexperienced, educated, pretty boy. That might be fine for the senate, but not for the presidency. Maybe in another 10 years he should try it again.
Posted by: staciD | May 17, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Now before we resume the bashing of the candidates, can anyone define the difference between a Sunni or a Shiite?
If you can’t then please stop trying to bash a candidate for stating we need to talk to our “enemies” when in fact they should be equals before any negative action is taken against them to make them an enemy.
Posted by: kroveaN | May 17, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
The human ego is an amazing thing. The truth is that all three candidates stink and most people are too immersed in ‘my candidate’ to see that there is enough dirt and politics as usual to go around for everybody. In a very real sence the media hand picked which choices we have and like obedient sheep most of us went along because we either didn’t have the knowledge or courage to do better. Think about it America: Out of a country of 300 million people is this the best that we can come up with?
Posted by: Rob | May 17, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
BO is spineless. Yes, the leaders he cited did talk to our enemies, but there were pre-conditions. BO reminds me of your kid who was caught doing something. His only defense was that someone else did the same thing! Each day that passes, I find myself not only disagreeing with BO, but clearly despising him.
Posted by: Frustrated Voter | May 17, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
We don’t need John McCain. Obama may not be all that experienced, but McCain is set in his hateful ways.He lacks sound plans to move the country forward.Obama doesn’t really seem AS presidential as he once did , but McCain doesn’t garner a vote of confidence for me.What will McCain really do to help turn this economy around?He is going to leave it up to the people who have the money.Dumb just dumb.There may be some rich folk that care about the least fortunate, but not enough to stop this nation from falling into despair.There needs to be laws to make sure that everyone is getting a fair portion of the American pie.Prices are skyrocketing out of control and we are headed off a cliff on a bullet train. Is there any plan to fix it? The republicans only offer the same old trickle down mess.Republican Politicians are the true elitists.They talk about values, but are really selfish self righteous pharisees.We cannot depend on the kindnest of strangers to keep us afloat. We need laws.DEMOCRATIC LAWS!
Posted by: TV | May 17, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Now that Obama is showing his real colors, it is obvious what a loser he is. Is this the best America can do? I hope Hillary takes it big time!
Posted by: Jim | May 17, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Isn’t American politics wonderful!!! We have such passion for our political views!
Not much has changed since the time of Thomas Jefferson. We hate and slander the other side and even make things up when it suits us. But for two hundred years now, our politics is like a religion in this country where we are willing to die for our ideals, even when they are really dumb.
Despite all that, most of the time we seem to get it right, given the choices we have in the first place.
Posted by: Bill | May 17, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Can you guys please fix the “appealing/appalling” mixup in the article? Someone alerted you to it a while ago, its very unprofessional and incorrect.
Posted by: mike | May 17, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Oooooooooo, looks as tho’ the Boy Wonder has lost his grip on the Magic Cape!!! I say, give him a 4-8 more years to mature and to get competent advisors and try, try again. The boy has potential, but not the facts.
Posted by: Disgusted | May 17, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Despite his flaws, my fellow democrats if Obama is the nominee we need to get behind him.Like Hillary said..it would be a terrible mistake to vote for McCain if you voted for Hillary or Obama.We do not need any more alienating,greedy republican policies. VOTE DEMOCRAT!
Posted by: TV | May 17, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
adam, the reason the “media” are giving Obama so much attention is…….he’s running for President! did you know that? i did, cause I have the MEDIA! if you dont like different points of view, just watch FOX!
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
I am a democrat and am refusing to support Obama!
Dems deserved to be betrayed, They treated Hillary unfair and insulted women!
I am leaving the Democratic party and will be casting my vote for McCain!
1 million women are leaving the Democratic Party!
It is definite!
Posted by: Janette | May 17, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Does anyone wonder why there is little discussion of Syria – the real threat? Can anyone get their head out long enough to understand this and quit giving cadence to Iraq and Iran which are the obvious?
Posted by: Focus wrong | May 17, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Me too!
Obama stole Hillary’s lead on popular vote at Indiana Lake County!
Blacks are threatening all the superdelegates one by one!
By force they may be nominating Obama but won’t get our votes!
1 million for Hillary will go for John McCain!
Posted by: Shanna | May 17, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
No connection between Iraq and 9/11, no weapons of mass destruction, and after a report that there was no proof that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, how do you believe anything that Bush says?
Posted by: Thinking | May 17, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Janette: i guess youll be doing yourself and the rest of the women a disservice because you cant name a single policy issue that benefits you or women that john mccain has come up with. You are also doing Hillary a dis-service. if she was losing to anyone else would you be so adamant in leaving the democratic party? if it was richardson or edwards or kucinich would you be leaving? probably not be realistic john mccain is not an option
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
If you are SICK of the HATE and RACE issues than you must be SICK of Obama because he is the one that started everything by USING THE RACE CARD EVERYTIME SOMEONE DISAGREED WITH HIM.
When did he do this? what racially charged statement did he make?
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Are people really STILL whining about Hillary? Didn’t she lose a long time ago? It’s a two person race at this point.
Posted by: A B contest C yourself out | May 17, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
We will be marching in FL tomorrow against Obama and the DNC!
Count our votes as is or we will be leaving the Democratic party for John McCain!
Posted by: Sherry | May 17, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
American arrogance is clearly on display here….the sort of position which makes America hated by the world. Pls wake up America..the power base of the world is shifting east, and the dynamics have altered, and America’s relevance is subject to it’s ability to change in a fundemental way how it defines it’s strategic interests….The old ways of doing things do not work anymore….the Brits needed to speak to the IRA at the highest level to get peace in the north. America will need to accept how democracy is defined elsewhere….America will need to speak to folks it otherwise would not speak to…and do yoy know why…becuase increasingly America is not needed as much….look at how China has made the IMF/World bank irelevant in parts of Asia and Africa…..you could not even get Saudi Arabia to increase oil production…..I find it strange that in the name of experience America is seeking to preserve the status quo….yet the challenge to America’s core believes leaves some too uncomfortable…..This election is so defining which way America votes will either maintain it’s downward tend….I speakas an outsider who has been amazed America can elect a man in the form of Dubya speaks like he did in Israel recently…make a mockery of the American intellect….is this the best America could summon???? The land of the free and the brave??? How brave can America be this fall???
Posted by: Kojo, Dublin Ireland | May 17, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Robin Obama has mentioned JFK numerous times during the Democratic primaries, so it is not just because Ted is in the hospital. Obama has said he wants to take us back to the foreign policy traditions of JFK, George Bush Sr. and Reagan. No mention of Bill
Clinton. I guess those two Clinton terms have just been erased by the Obama camp. But if I want Reagan or George Sr over Bill CLinton, then why shouldn’t I vote McCain then?
Posted by: alpaig | May 17, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Virginia – I’m so sick of right-wingers spouting off about they purposely mislead about what Obama said. He has said the agenda and everything would be set before hand – how is it you think diplomacy works? You think someone can just go to another country without doing the work before hand? The agenda would be set – meaning – the agenda would SPELL OUT IN DETAIL exactly what would be on the agenda to talk about – such as nuclear disarmament. This doesn’t happen overnight. Everybody knows that – Obama is a lot smarter than you give him credit for, just because he doesn’t give the Diplomacy 101 course, with a step-by-step detail to everyone, doesn’t mean he doesn’t get it. URGH. Frustrating.
Posted by: Jenna | May 17, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Isn’t there terrorism in your own country, Kojo in Ireland between Catholics and Protestants?? Go clean up your own mess, and lay off the green beer before you critize anyone here!
Posted by: Lo And Behold | May 17, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
We are 1 million women!
We will walk away from the Democratic Party!
In a year the Republicans would never win, we will make it happen, with our votes Republicans will win!
Go McCain vs. Obama!
we are 1 million strong for Hillary!
John McCain 2008
Hillary 2012
Posted by: Sue | May 17, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Sad, sad, that people need to pretend to be others to spread their hatred across the internet. As proven in the elections where the Republicans and their dirty policies attempted to dump Wright on Democratic candidates, the electorate was too smart to buy into the lies and smears. That’s why the Democrats have picked up 3 new seats.
But Republicans never learn. They just keep trying over and over to with the same old approach to fear mongering and hate mongering.
But your ridiculous posts make amusing reading, sort of like a fairy tale. Fortunately, the ending will be happy when Obama is sworn in as President–in spite or your hatred.
Posted by: The Rea Kira | May 17, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Hillary supporters, Please go to the thread Hillary scripted attack against McCain. Then you can tell each other how you are going to vote for McCain if Hillary isn’t the nominee.
Frankly it makes no sense and I am sick of hearing from you.
Posted by: Thinking | May 17, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
How well are we dealing with our enemies under the Bush Administration? And since when did dead silence become diplomacy? All Bush does is generalize our enemy and make erroneous historical comparisons to keep America in a continous tailspin. First it’s Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, then it’s Hussein, then it’s terrorists, axis of evil, radicals, extremists, insurgents, Iranians… AL QAEDA is our enemy! It was negligence that left us vulnerable to an attack. As former Secretary of Defense, Condoleeza Rice got a memo in January 2001 outlining a strategy against Al Qaeda IN AFGHANISTAN. We did nothing to make us safer, and 8 months later The Bush administration let it happen. Then we got ourselves into a quagmire in Iraq and no WMD’S were found. The Iraqis are not safer and WE are not safer. There is Al Qaeda in Iraq NOW, but only because we chose to take out Hussein. At least when he was there, the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds weren’t erupting in Civil War. This is the wrong war to be fighting. Obama has said that since 2002, and he will restore the U.S. as a superpower and restore our image in 2009. The Bush Administration actually gave themselves a color code for how scared you should be today, how appropriate. That color code was really an incompetence meter. People ate it up like dogfood for a little while. The fear, distractions and obtuse face of America’s enemy is now a phantom. Now the world wants to see an American President with leadership, and Obama brings that. That means talking to our enemies and bringing most of our troops back home. We will still need the military in Pakistan and Afghanistan. America needs a big change to clear our heads and start making sense again. The media plays games with your head, people just have to wake up from it and think for themselves. It’s the politics of fear that give you that type of divisive minset!
What we are doing now is far more reckless than talking to our enemies.
By the way, Bush drawing comparisons between Admadeinijad and Hitler is f***ing funny.
George W. Bush is the worst President this country has ever seen, and that’s why some people are still understandably afraid.
Barack Obama, 44th President of The United States of America!
Posted by: Kyle | May 17, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
i didnt write that last thing, what’s up??????
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
The TRUE OBAMA. Not The OBAMA that gives nice speeches but the REAL OBAMA behind the MASK and the one who makes Hillary look like a SAINT !
Chicago Sun-Times—A close examination of Obama’s first campaign clouds the image he has cultivated throughout his political career: Obama, who runs on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless, first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it. Alice Palmer, friend and mentor to Obama, served the district in the Illinois Senate for much of the 1990s. Decades earlier, she was a community organizer in the area when Obama was growing up in Hawaii. She risked her safe seat to run for Congress and touted Obama as a suitable successor. But when Palmer lost the congressional race, her supporters asked Obama to fold his campaign so she could easily retain her state Senate seat. Obama not only refused to step aside for the woman who was his friend and had recommended him for the seat, he filed challenges that nullified Palmer’s hastily gathered nominating petitions, forcing her to withdraw. Had Palmer survived the petition challenge, Obama would have faced the daunting task of taking on an incumbent senator. “He wondered if we should knock everybody off the ballot. How would that look?” said Ronald Davis, the paid Obama campaign consultant whom Obama referred to as his “guru of petitions.” Davis filed objections to all four of Obama’s Democratic rivals at the candidate’s behest. All other candidates were disposed of by Obama’s challenges. He then went on to win the election.
Obama is nothing but a THUG in an empty suit !
Posted by: Kyle | May 17, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Sue: i respect your loyalty to Hillary but i think your being a bit unreasonable. McCain is going to appoint judges that will overturn Roe vs wade and you will go far longer than 4 years without any political clout. You are doing Hillary a great dis-honor voting for john mccain. And in 2012 whose to say it wont be another female candidate thats better than hillary? You might be a little presumptuous with this
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Thanks Debbie,
For the JMC interview videoclip with Rubin. McCain is such a hypocrite!
Posted by: Mike | May 17, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
There are 57 states in Islam. That’s why Barack got confused.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Kyle: so he was asked to do something. had people follow him and support him, his friend loses and wants him to drop out and he doesnt. Isnt that what hillarys doing? shes staying in and changing the rules to benefit her. only obama didnt change the rules he played by them and used them agianst alice palmer
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
The issue is not whether Sen. Obama will convince the working-class white Democrats, but whether working-class white Democrats will overcome their struggle to transcend politics of division.
Posted by: Drdike | May 17, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
It’s sad how so many of the anti-Obama posts and even a scattering of the anti-Bush/McCain posts here are obviously the same dimwit using different names.
Posted by: Holly B. | May 17, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Can MCCain just tell us what he will do and allow Obama to tell us his own version instead of MCcain trying to tell us what Barack will do…this is sickening….Bush does not deserve a third term. Period.
Posted by: dave | May 17, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
There are 57 states in Islam. That’s why Barack got confused.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008 9:26:14 PM
Are you serious? hes been in america longer than hes been around people of the Islamic region. When was the last time he was in an Islamic nation state? You dont know please stop with this mudane association and fear mongering of the muslim people. Just so you know the most violent religions over history christianity and muslims. Prior to 9/11 what have anyone of middle eastern decent done to america?
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Hillary supporters! are you guys nuts? Hillary herself said that a McCain vote is a huge mistake! YOU MAKE NO SENSE WHAT-SO-EVER just admit you’re republican trash like the rest of them
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
“I HEARD BARACK OBAMA HAS BLACK CHILDREN!!!!!!!”
Did you hear this from one of McCain’s push polls? Now that would be rich.
Posted by: Ken | May 17, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Susan, why would you vote for McCain when the Supreme Court is at risk. Those justices are getting old especially Stevens who is 88. He will probably retire within the next term. McCain has already said that he will appoint conservative judges. Eventually one will go through just like with the Bush appointments. We can vote Obama out of office in 4 years. But we are stuck with the Supreme Court until they retire.
Posted by: lisa | May 17, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
As I said before , we are powerful militarely but we strangely lack “tersticular fortitude” to talk to our adversaries .
We can drop bombs on them from fourty thousand feet up in the air but we are too COWARD to engage them face to face dipomaticaly . WHY ???
The word ” CANNOT ” should not be in our national policy .
Posted by: Andre A | May 17, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
57 is the number of primaries. You folks who rip a person apart because of tiny errors: may I assume you are perfect and NEVER ever say one thing that may be misinterpretted.
And I am sick and tired of the women who berate Obama simply because he doesn’t carry his reproductive organs internally. Give me a break. I’m every bit a feminist as the next but the sun doesn’t rise and fall on Hillary Clinton. She has run a deeply flawed campaign and has spent that last three months arguing that the rules should be changed just so she can win. SHe lost fairly and squarely, and rather than pouting and crying foul, you should shake off your disappointment and realize that the real enemy is not Barack Obama but the Republican candidate.
Posted by: Kira | May 17, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Bitter women you are@
We are urging Mrs. clintoin to run as an independant so we can raise money for her and pay off her debt , Plus she has a very good chance to beat both Obama and McCain!
It is up to her.
We easily could hva eraised 20 million but we ‘re all maxed out!
In primary election the most you can give is $2300!
She needs to run for president so we can raise more money! Otherwise she will loose the money and no big deal for her!
But I think that since Obama is accepting donations from foreign countries such as Palestine, Lebanon, Chchenia, Sudan, Somalia, Iran and Syria, if I were Mccain I ;d force him to release his all donors one by one!
With names and addresses!!!
We again are 1 million women and will NOT vote for Obama!
It will be either Hillary or McCain!
Now you can call us what ever you can but you still won get our votes and will loose to John McCain in November!
Posted by: Donna | May 17, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
guess I’m uneducated or things have changed when I was in school there were 50 states, not 57. I never learned that the Great Lakes were in Oregon. I never learned that the people of Afghanistan spoke Arabic. I never learned that the Iraqi’s grew Poppy’s. Did this guy go to school in the USA???
I’m sure that none of his well educated supporters were aware of these things, otherwise I would suspect someone would have clued him in. What about his wife, she’s supposed to be so educated, if so why hasn’t she taught him what is fact. They’re both phonies!
Lord he was joking. Geez. at least he didnt say he was being shot at like hillary or make a bad joke like Gov Huckabee
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
“57 STATES” WAS A JOKE YOU MORONS LET IT GO
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
I am part of 1 million womentoo!
I will be leaving the party too and will cast my vote for John Mccain!
Posted by: Debrah | May 17, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Allamr18…You’re right. Hillary should contest the election and burn people in churches like Obama’s cousin Odinga who lost the election in Kenya. Too bad Barack’s campaigning in his other country of nationality (he IS considered a citizen of Kenya by Kenyans) didn’t win the “independents” in that country.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Daro!
Why should we let it go? he siad 57 states and there are 57 Muslim states in the world1 Obama’s mind is in Islam!
You people called Huckabe a murderer yesterday for his joke!
Posted by: Dan | May 17, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Operation Board Games = The Rezko Case
Posted by: Bronx4Freedom4All | May 17, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Krissy: What policy issue do you agree with with John McCain? please name one. maybe its civil unions or border control because all three candidates have the same stance other than that hillary and obama are identical except healthcare
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
I was voting republican since 1970 until the second Buch period. When he start bulling every nation in the world that resisted his “coalition” against Saddam I understood the man was out of order.Time confirmed my fear and we are now in the mess we, american voter, choose to be.
For a real change we have no alternative but try new leadership.
Obama talks beautiful and also what he says make sense. He offers new directions we should approach. Can he deliver? Again, that is up to us and up to the politicians we elect to help him on the administration of our country.
Let’s get over with racism and religious fanatism.Let focus on the facts that affect us more, economy, unemployment,etc. Let show to the world that america is the land of justice, opportunity and equality.Let try to get the country out of this mess…
Posted by: Carlos R. Silva | May 17, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Donna, Hillary won’t run as an independent. She is a true democrat and also she would not want to tarnish the Clinton legacy and it would if she ran independent.
Posted by: lisa | May 17, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Allamr18…You’re right. Hillary should contest the election and burn people in churches like Obama’s cousin Odinga who lost the election in Kenya. Too bad Barack’s campaigning in his other country of nationality (he IS considered a citizen of Kenya by Kenyans) didn’t win the “independents” in that country.
Lol didnt america have the same problem 40 years ago? burning black churches and abortion clinics? Matter a fact Condeleeza Rice best friend was killed in a church bombing. And what does his cousin have to do with anything, if thats even his cousin probably spam. Hillarys brothers were involved in white water does that make her guilty too?
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Just a bit of the obvious ….
DIE-HARD REPUBLICANS – Note that Obama clearly stated if you feel the Bush Policies regarding International Relations and Health Care are successful and have benefited the average American – vote for McCain.
Basically, he, the Democrats and most American voters have “written-off” voters with the narrow “with me or you are against America” perspective.
The simple fact is that Bush and the Republican “Policy” as it has been lately is a near-total failure in every crisis, some worse than others.
DIE HARD DEMOCRAT “DEFENDERS”
Get a grip … What defines Obama is his ability to reason, to reconsider and refine the solution to fit the core problem(s). He is a thinker … that is change enough when the climate is full of “gut instinct” con artists and panderers.
He doesn’t walk on water or pretend to be perfect or have an answer for everything – don’t box him in. You finally may have a reasoned man of faith as a leader, he is his own defense.
My fellow Americans, we need to listen to each other FIRST, then consider and ask questions. It saves a lot of embarrassment and allows us to adapt to include the important concerns of others in defining a truly working solution.
It might just be a simple as one candidate seeing a glass half full and the other seeing a glass half empty. Is your glass filling up or draining down?
It’s not about arcane “history” or how many angels can dance on the head of a pin … That’s just a cop-out headgame to avoid the realities.
This election is about direction.
Do we want a Corporatocracy where the public is promised opportunity (corporate trickle-down) and given lies and labor but no gain – indeed loss? One party offers that as a CERTAINTY – the Devil we know, so to say.
The alternative party is proposing that the chief concern of the Federal Government should be populous … for the greater good of citizens at large. There is NO CERTAINTY in this approach, except faith in doing “the right thing”.
About 2000 years ago, God himself instructed us to have faith and “do the right thing” and he walked the talk. What would he ask of you?
Factor that into your decision and soften your hearts to each other. With that … whatever comes will be the best of the alternatives for the greater good.
Posted by: MikeKing | May 17, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Pandering is an art that McCain now practices as he runs around kissing up to right wing hate mongering religious leaders, the National Rifle Association, Neocon Bushies and any other group or organization that he has opposed in the past.
Posted by: Vicki | May 17, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
I have received an email from 1 million women leave the democratic Party group today!
I will be leaving the Dems. if Obama ever gets this nomination!
There is a limit out there for me to swallow this guy’s and his anti American wife’s evil agenda against the US Goverment , just for the unity of the Democratic Party!
i’d rather having John McCain 4 years!
I will never ever vote for Obama!
Posted by: Ashley | May 17, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Fascist Alert,
By the same token I can say that Obama’s heavy drug use when he was younger has impaired his mental capacities, to the point where he said he would meet unconditionally with the head of Iran.
Clearly this man, and his drug habit, are not fit to run a country.
And the man has a weak will – he still has not been able to quit smoking – probably still used to the crack pipe.
Posted by: JA | May 17, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Candi Delight, I agree with you. The Democratic Party has been hijacked by the far left and the Republican Party by the far right. America needs an independent, Hillary is poised to do the job.
Posted by: robin | May 17, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Lisa!
Democratic party became far left wing!
If Hillary runs as an independant don’t be surprised!
there is a rumor lately!Isider information!
Posted by: Ashley | May 17, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
dan, Islam is not your enemy. and also, Obama is not a muslim. IT WAS A JOKE. our own FEAR and IGNORANCE will bring down America, no need for any help from overseas, people like you are destroying this country
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Lol what? they differ on everything except gay marriage and border control. health care, the war, education, economy, come on they are nowhere near the same. but bush and mccain are both warhawks. they want war at any cost. They dont care about people in america. Im not a hillary fan but i trust her more than McCain. I think you will be doing yourself a dis-service and wasting your vote.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Just a bit of the obvious ….
DIE-HARD REPUBLICANS – Note that Obama clearly stated if you feel the Bush Policies regarding International Relations and Health Care are successful and have benefited the average American – vote for McCain.
Basically, he, the Democrats and most American voters have “written-off” voters with the narrow “with me or you are against America” perspective.
The simple fact is that Bush and the Republican “Policy” as it has been lately is a near-total failure in every crisis, some worse than others.
DIE HARD DEMOCRAT “DEFENDERS”
Get a grip … What defines Obama is his ability to reason, to reconsider and refine the solution to fit the core problem(s). He is a thinker … that is change enough when the climate is full of “gut instinct” con artists and panderers.
He doesn’t walk on water or pretend to be perfect or have an answer for everything – don’t box him in. You finally may have a reasoned man of faith as a leader, he is his own defense.
My fellow Americans, we need to listen to each other FIRST, then consider and ask questions. It saves a lot of embarrassment and allows us to adapt to include the important concerns of others in defining a truly working solution.
It might just be a simple as one candidate seeing a glass half full and the other seeing a glass half empty. Is your glass filling up or draining down?
It’s not about arcane “history” or how many angels can dance on the head of a pin … That’s just a cop-out headgame to avoid the realities.
This election is about direction.
Do we want a Corporatocracy where the public is promised opportunity (corporate trickle-down) and given lies and labor but no gain – indeed loss? One party offers that as a CERTAINTY – the Devil we know, so to say.
The alternative party is proposing that the chief concern of the Federal Government should be populous … for the greater good of citizens at large. There is NO CERTAINTY in this approach, except faith in doing “the right thing”.
About 2000 years ago, God himself instructed us to have faith and “do the right thing” and he walked the talk. What would he ask of you?
Factor that into your decision and soften your hearts to each other. With that … whatever comes will be the best of the alternatives for the greater good.
Posted by: MikeKing | May 17, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Yeah, I think someone is appropriating names and posting negatives: typical Republican ploy. And obvioiusly the same poster is desperately posting against all things Democratic. It is really funny on so many levels, this desperate attempt to turn a flawed candidate into someone electable.
And the ‘women’ who are so vocally against Obama because he is the likely Democratic nominee: I think probably most of you are secret Republicans who are hiding behind feminism to obscure your real purpose. No right thinking Democrat would EVER prefer to vote for McCain and his Bush-light platform AND the possibility he would be appointing Supreme Court Justices simply because Hillary isn’t going to be at the top of the ticket. Get real.
Posted by: kira | May 17, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
When are you peooke going to get it into your heads that your not going to go around the world telling everyone what they are going to do. You can’t even run this country correctly but yet you think you are the worlds leaders. Unless we show other countrys we are willing to forgo are arrigance and to reach agreements by talking to each other in a intelligent way. Nothing is going get solved your going to be at war with everybody. Becuase the rest of the world is about had enough of us. Or should I say you. Because I would be willing to sit down and talk and try to come to some kind of solution. This country is just as must a terrorist as any other. You just dont want to believe it. Obama 2008
Posted by: James E. Perigo | May 17, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
By the same token I can say that Obama’s heavy drug use when he was younger has impaired his mental capacities, to the point where he said he would meet unconditionally with the head of Iran.
Clearly this man, and his drug habit, are not fit to run a country.
And the man has a weak will – he still has not been able to quit smoking – probably still used to the crack pipe.
Yes because we know how horrible it is to have a president who smokes cigarettes? Didnt bush, clinton and the other 40 something odd presidents have some substance abuse issues? Thats not even an issue try again
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
It is too bad that no one will admit or even consider the possibility that a large part of the attraction of B.O. is precisely to befriend the (mostly Muslim) enempies we fear. Recall Kerry saying that the Muslims will become friendlier to the U.S. with B.O. as president. When he was asked why, his response was, because B.O. is a Black man. no one has discussed this, but I think many are so terrorized by the terrorists or potential terrorists, and so (rightly) disgusted by recent U.S. torture and denial of rights to many captured, that they DO want to offer an olive branch to the muslim world, including those who hate the U.S. and/or Israel. Is an olive branch appeasement? Well, it’s something very close—but no one wants to admit that they support B.O. as someone who can make nice to our enemies…
Posted by: Hatshepsut1988 | May 17, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
All of you saying that you are leaving the Dem party and voting for McCain, I just have 1 question for you. Why are you posting it over and over. I don’t care and I don’t think anyone else here cares. Just do it and stop whining about it. You are acting like toddlers having temper tantrums.
Posted by: lily | May 17, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Sheesh Allamer18…Doesn’t mean it should be done again. America has moved to the point that BO is the LEADING DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE. The problem is that we don’t know ANYTHING about him. His campaign for his cousin Odinga is important because Odinaga wants to put Muslim Sharia law into their democratic constitution. BO is definitely a Muslim. There is nothing wrong with that on the surface, but the middle east considers this a Holy War against Muslims.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
What do we know about BHO,not a damn thing the man has no record of ever doing anything except being a community organizer what ever that is. He is a weak kneed empty suit that says anything that anybody wants to hear. Just by watching and listening to him (which I cannot stand)he is your typical American hating liberal that thinks the rest of the world is right and we are wrong. Kennedy talked to Kruschev and it was a disaster if you bho supporters can remember. We do not talk to these thugs and murders we kill them before they kill us.McCain is to old but age before beauty he is the only alternative unless you want to cave in to radical Muslim terrorists. Barak keeps really bad company and you supporters are blinded by the artificial light that he gives off,put on some sunglasses and see what he really stands for. CONSERVATIVE(GUN OWNING) DEMOCRAT FOR MCCAIN
Posted by: JOHN | May 17, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
The Most DISAPPOINTING THING about Sen. McCain this season is his utter lack of principle in making allusions that he knows don’t hold any water. He made statements about Obama and Hamas in the past that are clearly not true, just to score a political point. He wrongly and purposefully sought to make a connection between Obama and Hamas, even though Obama had in the past condemned Hamas and expressed his strong support for Israel. McCain is not honorable afterall–just a creature of the old politics Obama is campaigning against! Furthermore, Sen. McCain takes offence when he feels that Obama is alluding to his age; yet, he clearly makes a not-so-veiled reference to Obama’s age by accusing him (wrongly) of being naive, “foolish” (a language from a politician who says he expects “respectful” debate), unwise, and inexperienced. We have moved from McCarthism to a new “McCainism” in divisive American politics. On the other hand, a perceptive, uniting Obama has demonstrated consistent good judgment (e.g., the decision to go to Iraq, analysis of geo-political issues, a Pakistani policy that is not wholly predicated on a Musharaf’s Presidency) whereas Sen. McCain has shown unbelievable memory lapses (even during foreign trips—in Israel), showing confusion on key issues and facts such as “Iran training of Al-Qaeda in Iraq”and his talk about staying in Iraq for 100 years. Obama is right: we should make a clean break with Bush-Cheney-McCain foreign policy. Democrats must chart a new course , especially in the face of Bush dismal failure in international. WE MUST TAKE NOTE OF THIS 21ST CENTURY TRIP FROM J. MCCARTHISM TO J. MCCAINISM.
Posted by: Dr. Sam | May 17, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
I wonder how far MLK, Ghandi, Desmond Tutu, Nelson mandela and the likes wouldve gotten without talking to their enemies? im pretty sure they wouldnt be in the history books if they didnt
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
I for one want to know what Obama has against the Bill Clinton Administration. Millions of new jobs, turned deficit into surplus, incredible period of peace and prosperity. Why did he think the only way he could win was by maligning his Democratic predecessor and lumping him in with the Bushes? That does not sit well with alot of Democrats!!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 17, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
ashley!
What did you hear?I know that mrs. Clinton is putting preassure on DNC to count FL and MI as is and seat the delegates as they count now.
If the DNC short cuts this race before Puerto Rico, than she had told several people that she will be running independant!
That is what I have heard! I work for the Clintons!
Posted by: Donna | May 17, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
yes! HILLARY AS AN INDEPENDENT! it was all that SUPPORT FROM HER PARTY that was really keeping her down! I’m sure she’s trailing behind because she’s a Democrat, and not because she’s MEDIOCRE! I voted for Bill twice, but back then he was the best choice we had. WELCOME TO 2008. The Clintons have “tarninshed” thier own reputation, if you have not noticed. If you want to vote for McCain, then do so! but dont act like Hil got a raw deal, she thought she had it in the bag before this whole “voting” thing started!
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
A disservice and wasting my vote. Oh you mean like I did for Gore in 2000. How about Kerry in ’04. Sure ‘wasted’ it then didn’t I.
You can define ‘waste’ any way you want. I define it as allowing Obama in the white house. I will vote to prevent him in.
And to the R v Wade fear mongers here, we have a House and Senate which have to VOTE. If Bush couldn’t overturn it, I don’t expect McCain to undo anything. The democrats have the majority anyway.
Which brings up an excellent point. Since we are in the majority in Congress, anything a certain democrat would want as a Bill would get written and passed. Anything. No way can we have Obama in now that I think about that possible scenario.
Posted by: Krissy K | May 17, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
heesh Allamer18…Doesn’t mean it should be done again. America has moved to the point that BO is the LEADING DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE. The problem is that we don’t know ANYTHING about him. His campaign for his cousin Odinga is important because Odinaga wants to put Muslim Sharia law into their democratic constitution. BO is definitely a Muslim. There is nothing wrong with that on the surface, but the middle east considers this a Holy War against Muslims.
Lol so since you dont know anything about him youll just fill in the blanks yourself? Muslims are not inherently evil people just like christians arent either. its the radicals that are always the problem. How can you talk crap about his Christian pastor then follow up and say hes Muslim. We have been fooled into fearing muslims when our biggest killer has always been us.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Does anyone recognize the quotation “If you want peace, you talk with your enemies. You do not talk with your friends”? No, it was not Obama. It was said by Moshe Dayan. Posted by: tex805 | May 17, 2008 6:45:48 PM
And I don’t know who said it but another excellent saying to help the helpless on this blog is “keep your friends close and your enemies closer”. You do that by talking to them. You can always bomb them, the trouble is if you know them, you can better deal with them. You might even have a better idea if they really have nuclear weapons or not before you start committing to a life long war, billions and soon trillions of dollars and tens of thousands dead (including the other side’s innocent losses) and tens of thousands maimed and mentally dranged survivors to care for….
In terms of the comparisons to Reagan and Kennedy, you know what, I think Obama will outdo them…. And one of the reasons why, is because he is not only a good talker, which comes in handy in negotiations, he is astute about human nature, he has a solid moral core and he is much tougher than anyone can yet imagine. One of the most powerful leaders in the freeworld lived by the mantra “talk softly and carry a big stick”. It seems to me there is no bigger stick than America’s nuclear power and its war machine and its intelligence service (for all the latter has screwed up of late).
In terms of saying Russia and China were not terrorist states – they where communist – thats pretty much the same and they were arch enemies of the United States. Darth Vader like….. Too many here do not know their history.
And for those saying what are your specifics Obama – right, and did anyone ask Bush for his specifics? I mean, its a piece of cake for him – if you don’t agree with me, you are the enemy. And I don’t talk, I shoot……. I think diplomacy, important negotiations, decisions about war, is not possible to be strategized and and road mapped for execution while your are a candidate for the Presidency. What is important to measure in an election is the strength of character, intelligence, judgement, interpersonal skills (not just running around slaping people on the old back and giving them a nickname and “looking into people’s eyes to see their soles”), and tenacity among others.
I think Obama has all of this, as did Reagan and JFK. I think Obama, because of who he is, has an opportunity to be of their stature and perhaps even more. Obama is what America needs at this time, granted, he may not look quite like what some might expect and this is causing a lot of stress in the minds and hearts of some of these rather surprised people. I am confident the majority of Americans will get past traditional ways of thinking and elect him for the decency, opportunity and strength he represents. These are times that demand even more of America than the likes of JFK and Reagan.
I would like to ask the moderator – where is your moderation of the extremism in comments from the likes of Lynns and “America First”? Really, they have been parroting away here some very ugly stuff for a long long time. And crowding out a real discussion of the real issues America faces at this historic time. Even if you chalk it up to freedom of speech (which is a bit of a stretch), I think it is unreasonable to let them carry on in this way without some admonishion to stop the extremism, race bating and hate mongering. An idea – why don’t you have two sets of blogs, the one for the typeo of diatribe they are spouting and perhaps another one for a serious discussion of the real issues? With extensive moderation on the latter to ensure people cannot come in to make such unhelpful comments. I encourage the media to think about performing its responsibility to promote facts, and a real and serious discussion of the issues and candidates.
Posted by: Paul | May 17, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Hillary will not run as an independent. She would only be hurting herself and the Clinton name. She would be foolish to do it. And she is not a foolish woman.
Posted by: lisa | May 17, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
…the minute we open talks with these thugs, that’s when they are ‘appeased’ through recognition by the United States as a force worthy of our attention and diplomacy. That’s why it was stupid for Carter to talk to Hamas…and why it is stupid to believe that Obama can make diplomacy and peace so easy to accomplish. Reagan and even Kennedy negotiated from a position of strength…I don’t see Obama supporting even something as basic as missle defense.
Posted by: bill | May 17, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
The Republican administration have driven the country into the ground. Time for a change. It’s that simple.
Posted by: Rainman | May 17, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
I am a PHD MD and a democrat!
I am not one of those uneducated Hillary supporters in other words!
I can not find one good reason to vote for Barrack Obama!
Noway, I would not vote for him!
I have no other choice than McCain!
Posted by: Hardy | May 17, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
A Vote For Obama Is A Vote Against America!
No true American would ever vote for Obama. I do not care what party you belong to, we are Americans first.
Hillary or McCain 2008
Posted by: Noway Obama | May 17, 2008 9:45:50 PM
Lol what does that mean? We are americans first!! Real bold and proud but what does it mean?
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Funny thing is, Allamr18…BO never and his church never reference any of those people. They only reference Malcolm X and Louis Farrakhan.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Does anyone recognize the quotation “If you want peace, you talk with your enemies. You do not talk with your friends”? No, it was not Obama. It was said by Moshe Dayan. Posted by: tex805 | May 17, 2008 6:45:48 PM
And I don’t know who said it but another excellent saying to help the helpless on this blog is “keep your friends close and your enemies closer”. You do that by talking to them. You can always bomb them, the trouble is if you know them, you can better deal with them. You might even have a better idea if they really have nuclear weapons or not before you start committing to a life long war, billions and soon trillions of dollars and tens of thousands dead (including the other side’s innocent losses) and tens of thousands maimed and mentally dranged survivors to care for….
In terms of the comparisons to Reagan and Kennedy, you know what, I think Obama will outdo them…. And one of the reasons why, is because he is not only a good talker, which comes in handy in negotiations, he is astute about human nature, he has a solid moral core and he is much tougher than anyone can yet imagine. One of the most powerful leaders in the freeworld lived by the mantra “talk softly and carry a big stick”. It seems to me there is no bigger stick than America’s nuclear power and its war machine and its intelligence service (for all the latter has screwed up of late).
In terms of saying Russia and China were not terrorist states – they where communist – thats pretty much the same and they were arch enemies of the United States. Darth Vader like….. Too many here do not know their history.
And for those saying what are your specifics Obama – right, and did anyone ask Bush for his specifics? I mean, its a piece of cake for him – if you don’t agree with me, you are the enemy. And I don’t talk, I shoot……. I think diplomacy, important negotiations, decisions about war, is not possible to be strategized and and road mapped for execution while your are a candidate for the Presidency. What is important to measure in an election is the strength of character, intelligence, judgement, interpersonal skills (not just running around slaping people on the old back and giving them a nickname and “looking into people’s eyes to see their soles”), and tenacity among others.
I think Obama has all of this, as did Reagan and JFK. I think Obama, because of who he is, has an opportunity to be of their stature and perhaps even more. Obama is what America needs at this time, granted, he may not look quite like what some might expect and this is causing a lot of stress in the minds and hearts of some of these rather surprised people. I am confident the majority of Americans will get past traditional ways of thinking and elect him for the decency, opportunity and strength he represents. These are times that demand even more of America than the likes of JFK and Reagan.
I would like to ask the moderator – where is your moderation of the extremism in comments from the likes of Lynns and “America First”? Really, they have been parroting away here some very ugly stuff for a long long time. And crowding out a real discussion of the real issues America faces at this historic time. Even if you chalk it up to freedom of speech (which is a bit of a stretch), I think it is unreasonable to let them carry on in this way without some admonishion to stop the extremism, race bating and hate mongering. An idea – why don’t you have two sets of blogs, the one for the typeo of diatribe they are spouting and perhaps another one for a serious discussion of the real issues? With extensive moderation on the latter to ensure people cannot come in to make such unhelpful comments. I encourage the media to think about performing its responsibility to promote facts, and a real and serious discussion of the issues and candidates.
Posted by: Paul | May 17, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
ot of spin there. Only the Obamabots will believe what you say. Obama’s pastor went with Louis FKhan to Libiya. The church bulletin board promoted Hamas. BHO and MO attended fundraisers for Hamas. Heck Hamas endorsed BHO junior. McCain doesn’t have to say much, people know already.
Lol right? do you even know why they had that in the bulletin board? Did you try to find out or did you just buy into what they were selling? and you dont know anything about farakhan youre just using media talking points. Say something about farakahn that hasnt been used by sean hannity or bill oreilly
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
unny thing is, Allamr18…BO never and his church never reference any of those people. They only reference Malcolm X and Louis Farrakhan.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008 9:51:59 PM
That because they cant. And what is wrong with Malcolm X and farrakhan? and please give me something original not Farrakhan dissed jews 20 years ago. What has he done that you disagree with fundamentally? do you even know
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
o Allamr18
I will get a fifth grader to explain it to you.
While your getting one why dont you explain it to me since you and a fifth grader seem to be on the same level
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
vote obama 08
Posted by: staniel | May 17, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Lisa!
I have heard the same thing! so don’t be so sure!
If the DNC does not count FL and MI as is or short cut this process before Puerto rico, Hillary will run independant!
I have heard that she has already told pelosi after IN clearly!
because What I have heard was, there were enough superdelegates to back Obama at the time but since Hillary told them she would leave and run as an independant they all are backed of and thinking! But than if they count FL and MI, she may as well be beating Obama on popular vote and will only be about less than 40 delegates behind him!
She might run independant!
The democratic Party treated her bad!
Anyone would understand that!
don’t be so sure!
Posted by: Dotty | May 17, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
First of all B.H.O, the junior is not YET the democratic nominee. IF he is the nominee, sure as hell democratic party deserves to be defeated. Hillary should take it to Denver and fight it out. Besides there’s an excellent chance for further revelations about BHO.
About Hillary being mediocre, if so you wouldn’t be worrying about her running as an independent, right? hmmm..
You do you realize that hillary is a junior senator as well right? Lemme ask you this if Laura Bush in 4 years gets into the senate and decides to run will you vote for her?
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
noway, i am a true American, and i am voting for Obama. If you were a true American, you would have respect for the freedom to vote for whomever you want. o and BTW we’re all humans first, hopefully.
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Krissy it’s not about Roe v Wade. It’s about the Supreme Court. I am sure Stevens will retire withing the next term since he is 88. In fact they’re all gettin up there. McCain said he will appoint conservative judges. Eventually one will go through just as they did under Bush. You can vote Obama out in 4 years but the justices are there until they retire. Why would you put the Supreme Court at risk like that. This is what is so scary with another republican in the white house. I asked this question before but no one wants to answer it. Honestly, people need to think about the future of this country and not just the next 4 years.
Posted by: lisa | May 17, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
bama frequently twists the words of others in his mocking, arrogant monologues, so why shouldn’t he expect the same? The only people who think Israel provides an excuse for militant jihadists are people like Obama. It appears that he does not know the difference between good and evil. Like Wright with his chickens coming home to roost, Obama suggests that there is an excuse for militant islam. He is an apologist for those whose views are morally abhorrent. He sees all sides and takes none. Does he truly know the difference between good and evil, right and wrong or are all views one vast and morally equivalent continuum from his perspective?
Lol do you even know who said the chickens are coming home to roost or what it meant at the time? And Isreal is not our only ally. Maybe we can get more if we talked to people. and no obama knows nothing about good and evil
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
“We should never negotiate out of fear, but we should never fear to negotiate.”
You ride PT boat in the open ocean, my friend.
Posted by: Frank | May 17, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Allamr18….Barack Obama is telling the Americans that are voting for him that he is fully Christian. That is a LIE. I am not speaking out against Muslims. Just your lying candidate.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Lisa, how would Hillary hurt the Clinton name as an Independent??? The Obama goons are doing a nice job of that, and their supposed to be of the same Party that Bill Clinton represented as President.
Hillary Clinton 2008
Chelsea Clinton 2016
Posted by: Mother Nature | May 17, 2008 10:00:21 PM
So i guess you support a dictatorship then huh? bush 1 clinton clinton bush 2 bush 2 clinton clinton clinton. looks like america is similar to russia
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
I just read this from Mark Hemingway on NRO I think this makes great sense! Here it is——-
Exurban league makes a very good point regarding Obama’s I’m-not-an-appeaser outrage:
Uh, dude? If you are not an appeaser, why on earth do you take it personally when Bush criticizes appeasers?
I’ve done plenty of PR work in my time, senator. Although you shouldn’t have released a statement at all, here’s how you should have handled a press question about Bush’s comments:
“One thing all Americans agree on is that appeasement doesn’t work. As president, I will engage in tough, principled, and direct diplomacy just like Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan before me. And of course, no American president will engage with terrorists, least of all those who seek to destroy our stalwart ally, Israel. I look forward to celebrating the 65th anniversary of Israel’s independence.”
That was easy, wasn’t it? If Bush gave a speech about drug dealers, would you release a statement saying, “how DARE you insult me!”? Of course not; you’re aren’t a drug dealer. So if you really aren’t an appeaser, you shouldn’t have willingly identified yourself with that group.
Posted by: Todd | May 17, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
I am a Republican and voted for Obama in MN to get rid of Hillary!
If the DNC thinks they will get those red states, they are wrong!
Only in the south with the black vote things may look good for Obama!
But it is not enough for him to win the White House!
Obama did not win anything , we won for him Obamacans! I eman people who hated Hillary and the Dems, found a way to picked the weakest candidate Obama!
Posted by: Shane | May 17, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
llamr18….Barack Obama is telling the Americans that are voting for him that he is fully Christian. That is a LIE. I am not speaking out against Muslims. Just your lying candidate.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008 10:00:49 PM
What honest empirical evidence do you have that he is muslim? no conjecture or circumstantial but empirical evidence shows hes a muslim
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Dotty, I am a dem and will vote for Obama or Hillary. But she would be commiting political suicide if she ran independent. She would never do it.
Posted by: lisa | May 17, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
lol…….Obama comparing himself to those men – what a joke! He’s so delusional! I guess after being brainwashed by Rev Wright for 20 years would do that to anybody.
Posted by: obama hussein | May 17, 2008 10:02:54 PM
What did Rev Wright say that was wrong? Or could be considered brainwashing? Becuase im pretty sure thats what Karl Rove did to america 8 years straight
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Lisa – Too bad. You guys who claim to represent the Democratic party have so solidly supported Obama, who most Democrats will NEVER support, that it’s up to the Republicans to appoint the next Justice. You should have thought about that before supporting somebody from the Democratic party who is SURE to lose.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
“Hope she does it. She has a solid, diverse coalition. She can do it.”
Hope she does it, too. If only she can get the full share of humiliation she deserves for running such an incompetent, racist, sexist campaign. A lesson to us all!
Posted by: tom | May 17, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
“THIS MAN IS DANGEROUS!”
Posted by: AMERICA-FIRST
LOL – You McCarthy wanna-bes who declare people “anti-american” and “dangerous” are the gravest threat to America or our time. You are the “anti-american” ones as you post your fear and smear behind the anonymity of the web. Pathetic pieces of sh-t. You are the traitor. LOL I’ll throw some confetti for ya when Senator Obama wins in November.
Posted by: EddyNewHope | May 17, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Lisa – Too bad. You guys who claim to represent the Democratic party have so solidly supported Obama, who most Democrats will NEVER support, that it’s up to the Republicans to appoint the next Justice. You should have thought about that before supporting somebody from the Democratic party who is SURE to lose.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008
What makes you think john mccain is sure to win?
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
I think Obama’s comments show his naive view of foreign policy….those presidents and THOSE leaders were NOT sitting down with the blood thirsty terrorists of today…I don’t think our president negotiated with Hitler. Obama is comparing apples to oranges on this one. He is just once again lifting Kennedy and Reagan as a comparison to himself.
Posted by: Darla | May 17, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Hillary has 4 more years in the US Senate. Hes been in the Illinois Senate since 94 i believe. They have passed the same amount of legislation 2 bills and have co-sponsered hundreds of others. And I know your not talking about wal-mart the chief exploiter of the blue collar worker? And living in the white house now makes you qualified. Dam guess all presidential wives should be good to go. Now Im not dissing hillary if she were to get the nomination she would have my vote and the same amount of money i gave Barack 250 bucks. Im not rich lol
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Buy your guns Americans. Buy your Guns.
Just look at the divide represented by tthese posts. The divide will continue tto grow and grow and grow. Republicans have about as much in common with Democrats as Nazis with Jews. Buy your guns and get ready for another Civil War. Get good at aiming, get good at shooting. Blood will flow through the streets. The real ideological struggle is happening in the United States. Practice and Train. Then get ready for the second Civil War. One side has to go.
Posted by: Civil War | May 17, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
mccain is a moron and even he knows it thats why he waits to see if people are going to clap or not before he smiles … he looks like he is thinking did that make sense? cause i can never understand this complicated stuff. lol
i call it the did they buy this bull **** pause…haha
Posted by: melissa | May 17, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Allamer18…Common sense.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Many of these hostiles claiming to know this or that about Obama but who are clearly racist, identify themselves with the names of women. Many of them are men. They know one thing. Women’s opinions seem to make people stand up and take notice, and women will ultimately make the difference when it comes to electing the president of the U.S. You will see that the general election will be much worse when it comes to these men professing to be “women.” They will do anything in order to block a black man from ever being president. Such hatred is incredible, isn’t it? I’m a white baby boomer, and I thought the day would never come!
P.S. I’m reading his book on values, etc. I realize this man is special.
Posted by: lanti | May 17, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
For 6 months Obamamaniacs have been spitting on the face of the other half of the party. The egomaniac BHO junior talks dismissively about Bill Clinton’s presidency simply because his wife is running against him. They used the pseudoscandals of 1990′s againt Hillary. Heck they even used Monica Lewinsky story to spit on Hillary.
Now we are all supposed to follow like lambs and vote for Obama,huh. All this would be irrelevant if only Obama is fit for the presidency. He is ridiculously inexperienced, arrogant egomaniac.
Lol we have? How so? Lets be clear hillary fans and obama fans have not been nearly as brutal as the media has. Theyve devided our party into white wroking class and latte drinking liberals, blacks and old white women, youth and uneducated. it wasnt until late in the race when all of that started getting negative play. i dont blame either one of them but the media has pit the democratic party agaisnt one another. why wasnt the same done to the republican party?
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
PGHVOTER, wow I am amazed at some of you Hillary supporters. So now you’re blaming everyone that voted for Obama on your votes for McCain. LOL I don’t think so. Half this country supports Obama and I don’t see them whining about voting for McCain if Hillary is the nominee. And FYI, I support the dem, any dem. And don’t be so sure about him losing.
Posted by: lisa | May 17, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
therockofages
You said does Obama know that Russia and China did not attack us?
What is your point? He said he would talk directly with our state enemies like Iran and N. Korea and not terrorists. Al Quaeda attacked us in 9/11 and he want’s to have a priority to destroy them.
And to all the wise people here who comment that Reagan and JFK only spoke to advisaries from a position of strength or that JFK was somehow responsible to bring us the brink of Nuclear war, don’t know get it.
JFK’s handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis was brilliant
Our strategy with the USSR was also wise.
Everyone who disagrees with Obama’s approach only need to know that he’s not the reckless type and what we are doing now is FAILING and getting WORSE and becuase of it our enemies are stronger and our military is getting outstretched and weaker. So how is this path working out for us.
Posted by: Dirk | May 17, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Allamer18…Common sense.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008 10:13:33 PM
If its so common explain it to me so i can be in the majority then
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
I am continually confounded by the unreal fact that Senator Barack Obama, a supposed well educated and intelligent man, considers his comparison of Krushchev, Gorbechev, or Mao to be a valid one. The main difference between all three of these past world leaders and the current President of Iran is that unlike the President of Iran, these three men were NOT completely off their rockers and hell-bent on the destruction of Isreal and the US. Talks or negotiation with no preconditions with a crazy man is like sitting down for an imaginary tea party with the Mad Hatter in Alice in Wonderland. Useless and beneath the dignity of the President and the United States. Senator Barack Obama shows a dangerously weak naivete that is frighteningly short-sighted in its scope.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | May 17, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
TruthAndNothingBut:
I appreciate your response, and agree with your assessment of the discourse on this board, but think the same can be said for proponents on both sides of the issue. For the life of me, I can’t understand how reasonable people can become so enamored with a particular party or politician that the truth, which all of us should be seeking, is no longer important.
That being said, I can agree with you that invading Iraq, from a realpolitik viewpoint, was a horrible mistake. In this regard, Bush Sr. had it right when he decided not to invade Iraq, and leave Sadam in power as a counterbalance to Iran. However, from a moral standpoint, Bush Sr.’s policy was, at best, questionable. Indeed, the far left repeatedly chastised him for not liberating Iraq (see George Clooney’s “The Three Kings”).
In a moment of philisophical schizophrenia, the neocons decided to overthrow Sadam based on their naive believe they could inject democracy between Iran and Iraq without signficant cost. In doing so, they created a vacuum, forcing our troops to fight a proxy war with Iran and to become the arbitrators in a simmering, thousand-year-old, civil/religious war between the Suni and Shia. Incredibly, the far left then berated Bush Jr. for doing what they had berated Bush Sr. for not doing.
No one wants to wage an opened-ended proxy war with Iran, particularly when we currently have no real power to strike back at the source either militarily (because of the serious domestic and international backlash) or economically (thanks to Iran’s seemingly endless oil supply). However, as I see it, Obama’s plan risks outright civil war in Iraq, partition, and a fundamentalist Greater Iran emboldened by our retreat. Neither alternative is palatable. I guess we can agree to disagree on which is the worse alternative, but I think most Democrats, including Hillary, think immediate withdrawal is not an option.
With respect to Afghanistan/Pakistan, I could not disagree with Obama more. We are already walking a thin line between protector and occupier, and a significant increase in forces there will make us, in the eyes of the Afghanis, no better than the Russians and British who proceeded us. Moreover, poking the Pakistanis to eradicate the Taliban and capture bin Laden risks creating a new fundamentalist state 180 million strong with a nuclear arsenal.
In short, no easy answers, and any politician who tells you so is not telling the truth.
Posted by: vancav | May 17, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Allamr, Russia is a very wealthy country now and is doing much better than the USA. I wouldn’t have any problems with a Clinton dictatorship. He left the office with plenty of surplus in the budget and kept us at peace. I don’t have a problem with that at all.
Posted by: Mother Nature | May 17, 2008 10:15:20 PM
Lol what? Russia is what? OK so your fine with one family running america? whats the point of democracy then? why have 250 years of this voting thing if only one family can rule. we might as well be cuba. and while you talk about our surplus you neglect the other asinine things bill did. he sat on his hands during the genocide in sudan, he did nothing about our dependence on oil, he passed the three strikes law to which hes said he regrets, and hes had the most lawsuits of any president in the modern era.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
“civil war” just shoot yourself and let the rest of us talk it out. thanks.
Posted by: daro | May 17, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Hillary will not run as an independent, period. No one can win as independent, period. Being an independent is political death, period.
Posted by: Thinking | May 17, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
a lot of stupid people on here…
Obama was right…
reagan and jfk
if you knew the details of each had their problems but speakign to their/our enemies saved us a lot of life and moneys…and years decades more …
yes they had strength behind their talks… and yes the fall out was an arms race and the bay of pigs…
but those moves on their part were the first steps out of bad situations that were hurting our country…
they were brave leaders…who were smart…
they did not hide in their laurels and think that would hurt the enemy enough that they would stop …
brave strong America …faces our enemies… and is able to talk to them straight on… stupid America is the one that doesn’t talk.
Learn the historical chain before you start trying to refute Obamas points …please.
The past eight years alone has taught us…not talking doesn’t work…and singling out specific countries doesn’t make them less important…it makes them more.
Posted by: dl | May 17, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Allamr18….the Media is owned by the GOP. This has been thier plan all along. They WANTED Obama to be the nominee because he would be so much easier to beat in the GE than Hillary. This has been their plan from the beginning. And, they also caught Dean, Pelosi, Kennedy, and Kerry up in their plan by making fools of them for supporting this idiot Obama!
Posted by: david from texas | May 17, 2008 10:18:30 PM
Mm i dont know because no one thought that he wouldve gotten this far. Remember when it started we thought it would be hillary and Gulliani. But it went completely opposite of that. If obama is so weak why are the repubs in such high alert. You see rove and company running to back mccain. I think hillary has more association flaws obama has more political flaws. but id vote either one of them
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Kenya, as the name fits, why don’t you pack up with your idiot candidate Obama, and go back to Africa. Maybe there, they will believe you and the lies he has tried to put on Americans. And, oh yeah, Kenya, here in America, the vote is what counts and Hillary has more than your idiot Obama, both in the electorate and in the popular. Its not over and won’t be over until We get to look at his idiot sad face when he loses, and the hateful wife of his as well……lol !
Posted by: david from texas | May 17, 2008 10:21:35 PM
Lol thats possibly the dumbest thing ive seen as of late. i wont even dignify it with an effort of response. Grow up
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Donna does not know the difference between Hillary and McCain. You vote for policies. If you want follies of Bush :must vote for McCain If you want fresh blood then Oboma is choice.
Two weeks before 2000 election.Bush was asked”What if Saudie stop pumping oil.?
His answer”When I will show my angery Face they will start pumping again::As a doctor I hnow it a sign of insanity. We have dearly paid for it. If we want to continue war,gas will be $10. and there will be revolt against the Government and democracy will be in danger We will be like 3rd world country.Some of the persons writing in this blog usse pseudo names like Patriot/Osama. Some people have a ache that how come Obama can be bright and intelligent. Republicans will try their best to involve peripheral issues and race and not issues effecting average persons. I know Jesus did not discriminate. Some have wtitten
about Wright but dot want to know about Hagee. Such people are un-Americans
Obama is a Christian, Fools will call it otherwise
If I have choice between the Christian and Muslim. I will anyday chose the intelligent of the two.
Obama,,,,extraordanery life of ordinery humble American. he is normal person who was born with a plastic spoon in his mouth unlike McCain who born with a silverspoon and his barby wife with a diamond spoon MCcain for the first time went to see the poor people in America. While Oboma started a humble life . He has just recently paid off his student loan.
I read Obama story to my childern so they get encourgement from his life.
Posted by: Rachhpal S Kukreja | May 17, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Out of this 16 million, polls indicate 30-40% will vote McCain or they want her to run as an independent.
***************************************
and she is supposed to win by getting 30-40% of 25% of the total electorate?
That is real good math.
Posted by: Thinking | May 17, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Please, all you Obama hating Democrats, join our party, the Republicans. We need your votes to continue our outstanding president Bush’s terror policies through our well respected candidate John McCain. Think about it, you don’t want a liberal Democrat like Obama in there, he would raise your taxes, so vote Republican. We hate Obama as much as you do. Do the right thing for yourself and for your children & grand-children-vote for John McCain.
Posted by: mary | May 17, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Hillary wins the swing states, Hillary wins all of the larger states. Obama wins the Republican states. Gosh, I wonder what’s going to happen in the General Election?
Posted by: USA | May 17, 2008 10:23:37 PM
Lol what swing states? West Vriginia? the same group that put bush in office twice. PA and MI will not go red. be realistic
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Lisa – All of the Republican (50% of the country) plus half of the Democrats(50% of the other half of the country (half of a half is 25%)) – equals 75%. Obama is a sure loser for the Democratic party.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Daro…I hope you own a firearm…or you better train your kids…there is no talking here. Read the posts. There are the mad rants of ideologues, obvious lies stated as facts, mis- and dis-information bantied about here and there…this is not talking. Every is right when in fact everyone is wrong. Civil War is the only way…sorry to wake you up to it.
Posted by: Civil War | May 17, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
It’s called brains…yes obama is smarter than most people on here…
and yes he is smarter than Bush or McCain
and yes we need the smartest guy as president.
the comparisons are correct for all those who want to say they are not.
Ahmadenijad is not a terrorist using terrorism to get the president to pay attention…he is the head of IRAN… the country of Iran.
Bad guys or not …he is a sovereign leader who was elected…
toignore him…to specifically huighlight this one of two or three leaders that we do not talk to…
does not make him less important it makes him more…
and if their is PR that can be used it would be all these leaders saying this guy is important enough for us NOT to talk to him even though he is the leader of a country.
The past eight years bought into this argument and guess what …he has gotten stronger idiots.
Posted by: dl | May 17, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Donna does not know the difference between Hillary and McCain. You vote for policies. If you want follies of Bush :must vote for McCain If you want fresh blood then Oboma is choice.
Two weeks before 2000 election.Bush was asked”What if Saudie stop pumping oil.?
His answer”When I will show my angery Face they will start pumping again::As a doctor I hnow it a sign of insanity. We have dearly paid for it. If we want to continue war,gas will be $10. and there will be revolt against the Government and democracy will be in danger We will be like 3rd world country.Some of the persons writing in this blog usse pseudo names like Patriot/Osama. Some people have a ache that how come Obama can be bright and intelligent. Republicans will try their best to involve peripheral issues and race and not issues effecting average persons. I know Jesus did not discriminate. Some have wtitten
about Wright but dot want to know about Hagee. Such people are un-Americans
Obama is a Christian, Fools will call it otherwise
If I have choice between the Christian and Muslim. I will anyday chose the intelligent of the two.
Obama,,,,extraordanery life of ordinery humble American. he is normal person who was born with a plastic spoon in his mouth unlike McCain who born with a silverspoon and his barby wife with a diamond spoon MCcain for the first time went to see the poor people in America. While Oboma started a humble life . He has just recently paid off his student loan.
I read Obama story to my childern so they get encourgement from his life.
Posted by: Rachhpal S Kukreja | May 17, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I think the racism in America is really starting to show. How many Policitcians have the attitude of white supremacy due to God given grace and forget everybody else. God loves us also and how do you know that he is not disappointed with you. Did not the Pope just acknowledge the wrongs committed aganist American Indians which every christian seems too what to forget. Even if we forgot the past and started with a fresh new start, then American Indians and former African slaves would still be at a dissadvantage. It’s like starting a race (no pun intended) and saying we,ve just robbed your of everything, but lets start fresh as if nothing happened. Does this seem fare or just? What ever happened to Christian love and mercy? Obviously this only applies to certain races who the others are supposed to follow along.
Posted by: alexis | May 17, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Evidently, according to some people, strong foreign policy means bellicose and uncompromising tone. If you don’t want to talk or compromise then what is “foreign policy”? Just start bombing any time you don’t like what you hear.
Here is the news: There are as many people on the other side as there are like you that scream “appeasement” the moment someone says let’s talk to America or Israel or let’s make peace with them.
A bully always brings out the worst in people. By talking to them, you’ll be stripping the fanatics from their argument and empowering the moderates that will ultimately bring down the radicals.
War is always the absolute last resort and often an unnecessary one.
Posted by: Adam | May 17, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
LOL!!!!!!!!!! Republicans are on high alert about Obamby??? Karl Rove must be laughing his a$$ off. The strategy Obamamaniacs used to trash Hillary is coming back at you. Obama has the most negative narrative NOW (it doesn’t matter what his supporters think is to be the truth) . All that matters is perception, not too many people are buying the Obama pony show.
Rove is about to be arrested so he can kiss my arse. But how is his narrative negative? what negative thing has he said? no hes doing what he said he would do. be plenty tough on the republicans when it comes to the general election. your trying to put him into a box and its not working. The only perceived weakness is foreign policy.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Obama is absolutely right. Every successful president negotiated with our enemies. Every failed president did not. If there was ever any doubt, George Bush’s colossal failure was due to this very mistake.
Posted by: suburbandad81 | May 17, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Obama is absolutely right. Every successful president negotiated with our enemies. Every failed president did not. If there was ever any doubt, George Bush’s colossal failure was due to this very mistake.
Posted by: suburbandad81 | May 17, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
In my opinion there is no distinction between the Democrats and Republicans for the last 20 years. Remember people this country is a Republic based on individual rights. Let us not forgo those rights based on corrupt elected individuals and criminals in our society.
We should all be united in that our elected representatives are in contempt of their constituents. Sure capitalism is your god given right but executives have forgot that country and duty is first and wealth is secondary.
The current track this nation is taking is economic suicide. This so called new world order is eroding all of our rights and our sovereignty. Let me pose one question? If a foreign mass of people were take our land without our consent, would this not be an act of war? Then why do we allow elected officials to pass laws that off shore our jobs and manufacturing capabilities?
If we are serious as a nation then the first step is to pull out of the WTO, slap tariffs on countries and Americans that put their executives and stock ahead of the welfare of the citizens of the USA.
Reward those companies that bring back the manufacturing capabilities to our soil. Get ordinary citizens involved and elected into our government and stop these elitists from ruining our future.
Just my two cents!
Posted by: Eric | May 17, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Barack Obama graduated with a B.A. from Columbia Univ., NY City, where he majored in political science with a specialization in International Relations. He entered Harvard Law School in 1988. His election in 1990 as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review was widely reported. Obama graduated with a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard in 1991. He was elected to the Illinois Senate in 1996 and re-elected to the Illinois Senate until he decided to run for the US Senate in 2004. He won his US Senate race and has served as Illinois Senator nearly four years. He taught constitutional law at the Univ. of Chicago Law School from 1993 until his election to the US Senate in 2004.
As US Senator, Obama sponsored and cosponsored excellent legislation 2004 – to present. As US Senator, Obama held assignments on the Senate Committees for Foreign Relations, Environment and Public Works and Veterans’ Affairs through Dec. 2006. In Jan. 2007, he left the Environment and Public Works committee and took additional assignments with Health, Education, Labor and Pensions and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. He also became Chairman of the Senate’s subcommitte on European Affairs.
As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Obama has made official trips to Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. In Aug. 2005, he traveled to Russia, Ukraine and Azerbaijan. The trip focused on strategies to control the world’s supply of conventional weapons, biological weapons, and weapons of mass destruction as a first defense against terrorist attacks. Following meetings with the US military in Kuwait and Iraq in Jan. 2006, he visited Jordan, Israel and the Palestinian territories. At a meeting with Palestinian students two weeks before Hamas won the legislative election, Obama warned that “the US will never recognize winning Hamas candidates unless the group renounces its fundamental mission to eliminate Israel.” He left for his third official trip in Aug. 2006, traveling to South Africa, Kenya, Djibouti, Ethiopia and Chad.
I’d say this candidate has been busy and actually works for his money!
Posted by: C. Lindy | May 17, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
For all the hillary people saying oh obama can’t win…
the polls that show Obama beating McCain in the head to heads…inherently take in to account the defections of hillary supporters (who most likely will not as a majority …even close) who said out of frustration and wanting their candidate to win… that they would vote for McCain …
Obama beats McCain if even half of the Hillary supporters voted for mcCain…and that was the maximum who said they would in the exit polls…
so this is probably going to be a blow out for Obama.
Posted by: dl | May 17, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Allamer18…Pennsylvania? Did you not understand my name? I am a PITTSBURGH, PA voter. Barack Obama won 6 out of 67 counties in a state that was one of the 13 original colonies of the USA. We screamed OVERWHELMINGLY that we do not want him to represent the USA.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
West Virginia has also backed every Democratic President that won the General Election, they weren’t the only state to put Bush in the White House.LOL
Posted by: shalabalaboo | May 17, 2008
Right and look how well thats turned out for them. 1 in 6 of west virginians are on wel fare. they have one of the highest unemployment rates, less than half have college degrees and most make less than the standard of living for the state. Theyve been lied to by the previous presidents
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
The issue here is about preconditions. Obama said he would talk with Iran and company without preconditions.McCain never said that he would never engage in talks with Iran and company, however, he stated in order to do so that the U.S needed to be in a position of strength and there had to be preconditions met! Obama find me a direct quote where McCain said that he would never engage in talks with Iran no matter what conditions they met I dare you, that goes for your cult also. My friends this is appeasement, we are giving our opponents what they want with nothing in return, a la wikipedia definition: is used for the policy of accepting the imposed conditions of an aggressor in lieu of armed resistance. Iran wants to engage in talks with us without giving up their nuclear program and their operation chaos in Iraq. This is stupid and reckless as McCain has stated. In addition regarding Obama’s reference to Kennedy and Regean, Obama is an idiot and needs a high school history lesson. As vancav clearly stated, both Kennedy and Regean talked from positions of strength and preconditions. Kennedy came in with the precondition of MAD, mutually assured destruction, that was a huge incentive for the Soviets to speak with us(let’s us talk about the compromise of the Cuban Missile Crisis, buildup in the Vietnam War, Berlin Wall crisis). Also Regean talked to the Soviets after referring to them as “the Evil Empire”, building U.S armed forces, restarting the nuclear arms race, assisting in the Soviet-Afghan War, and threatening the Soviets with the Star Wars project. Obama is wrong big time, that’s why he is so defensive and sensitive of this issue, Obama is talking this too far and McCain is going to hit him back hard its going to be wonderful. They way Obama speaks of foreign policy I can assure you that the U.S will have another disastor that makes the Iran hostage situation of the Carter administration look like a joke, and ironically will force us into a wider war in the Middle East than we already are. McCain next week tell Obama if you want a debate okay lets have it, June 4th, me and you, entire debate on their views and policies on foreign policy. Watch Obama back off, just watch.
Posted by: Gonzalo | May 17, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
pghpavoter, there will be lots of republicans crossing over so your math is incorrect. They don’t like McCain, they wanted Romney. And not all of Hillary supporters will vote for McCain. And don’t even try to convince me they will because it’a just not true.
Posted by: lisa | May 17, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Allamer18…Pennsylvania? Did you not understand my name? I am a PITTSBURGH, PA voter. Barack Obama won 6 out of 67 counties in a state that was one of the 13 original colonies of the USA. We screamed OVERWHELMINGLY that we do not want him to represent the USA.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008 10:33:58 PM
Lol are you bitter? Lol just kidding. I used to live in PA. Altoona to be exact. great schools but really mean people. But PA had no chance to go for Barack. She had everyone the governor a popular mayor her husbands name. Im not taking it from her but she was supposed to win that one. And polls show that barack is beating mccain in PA by 7 points.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Eric, Thank you. Best post in a week!! You should get an award!
Posted by: mary | May 17, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
The more Obama talks of REAL issues, the more he shows his inexperience, his vagueness.
And US people buy into it, because for them, it’s better to be governed by a FOOLISH MAN than by a SMART WOMAN.
See how Hillary’s chances got snatched away from her in front of our eyes!!!
US headed towards DISASTER!
McCain can only save it. Trust him.
Posted by: Jkan | May 17, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
What is the difference between Obama and Batman? Batman CAN go out at night without Robin.
Posted by: mori | May 17, 2008 10:37:04 PM
O theres that political humor that never seems to be funny.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
davidfromtexas, 57 states….under fire in Bosnia. I would say underfire in Bosnia is far worse since she said it numerous times.
Posted by: d | May 17, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
As someone who cannot vote in the upcoming election I am non partisan, so it does not matter who wins. However, reading the thread makes me draw the conclusion that some people are very uneducated. These people spitting venom on Obama are big bigots using internet to express their sick mind. As some one who travels around the world especially to Asia, I know for America under Bush has become a subject of ridicule and laughter. Bush and company have made a joke of American power and people around the world are laughing, asking when Bush will catch Osama, when will he win the wars and the jokes go on and on.
Posted by: Maverik | May 17, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Lisa – You’re right. The Republicans will definitely be crossing the voting line for a McCain / Most Liberal Senator in the Senate competition. Like all of us in the center, they will be inspired by Obama’s unsupported claim to “Change”. Republicans love change.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I can’t believe you people are trying to convince other posters that your candidate (puppet of big business) is better that any other candidate. Grow up people!
Posted by: mary | May 17, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
isa – You’re right. The Republicans will definitely be crossing the voting line for a McCain / Most Liberal Senator in the Senate competition. Like all of us in the center, they will be inspired by Obama’s unsupported claim to “Change”. Republicans love change.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008 10:40:31 PM
Lol please Barack is no where near the most liberal. Kucinich has him beat by far. McCain cant even win all the votes when hes the only one on the ballot. He lost 25 percent of the vote in Pa to people not in the race
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Gonzalo
or Gonzo
I think you need to go watch the videos of mcCain he says that Obama would meet with terrorists on several occasions refering to Iran.
So if he is “accusing” Obama of meeting with Iran…doesn’t that mean he inherently would not.
and if he is planning on talking to iran isn’t it disengenuous for him to “accuse” Obama …and many times he has not mentioned anything about preconditions…
Mccain should debate Obama…this will be over quicker than it eventually will be… 8 years we have gone that path of not talking… McCain wants to bomb bomb bomb…
isn;t that how it goes?
don’t be stupid… McCain has to say he won’t meet with him…and that makes the guy more important not less.
Posted by: dl | May 17, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama does get elected president. Americans are stupid. Can you honestly expect anything more from this pathetic country and the pathetic people here?
Posted by: oliver | May 17, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
dl, you’ve got to be kidding, the smartest guy running?????
ask him how many Great Lakes are in Oregon, ask him how many states are in the Union.
at best he’s a delivery boy for the Kennedy’s and Kerry’s of the world.
Lord it was a joke.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Yeah, all you Obama haters, join the Republican party. Four more years of high gas prices. Let’s get into another war. As McCain has joked let’s “Bomb, bomb Iran.” Let’s continue Bush’s assault on human rights (Guantanamo, anyone?). Let’s put judges on the Supreme Court who will take away women’s rights. Four more years of millions of uninsured Americans, while the Haliburtons get rich. Yeah, vote John McCain – real smart.
Posted by: Rachel | May 17, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
If you ask any politician about the meaning of the word terrorist he or she will give you a different answer than other politician.why because the meaning or the word terrorist in Egypt is no the same as the word terrorist was used in kenya and is no the same in meaning in the u.s.A. every country has different meaning.before they use to call the palastainin liberation orgnization as terrorist but today every one was engage in talking with mahmoud Abas which represent the p.l.o.
if you dont want to talk to terrorist i want to ask you why are you talking to north korea which is helping the so call terrorist countries.Libya was considered to be one of the terrorist countries but now Libya which bomb the u.s.air plan over london has relationship with all the western countries.why libya is terrorist country why we you talk to them.and every body knows that you have deal with north korea and you made a deal with libya.we have to face the reality was people are suffering economically and why people are losing their jobs and houses and paying more for every thing and that enclude the gase.and tomorrow we will end up paying 50 percant of our income in gase and lose more jobs.the real problem is going to war and continuing to supprt the war will bring more problems.two things will not meet war and economy are not friends.every big problem that people are facing now let me tell you it is because if war.when you go to this war they say to look for seapons and every day there is change in the language. with every war there are war lords which make millions out of any war and the dont want the war to finish.i want to ask you who is the war lord.
they keep on injecting fear in people by saying terrorist will attack if we do not deal with them there.that is not true.why i want to ask question how can a terrorist come and do any thing to this country.how can he or they come and attack here by what means by donkey from other countries of by boat.that is not true the security is good in this country and the security is good in the ports and in the airport terrorist will never come to this country.the terrorist which attack the country on sep 11 they do not come from the border but they come by the door having legal visa.dont listen to the politician which says that terrorist will attack the country.its politics of fear politics of fear.you are strong and safe nothing will happen to this country.they whent to war for petrol we end up paying 4 dollar for gallon.if the war continue believe me after two years you are going to pay 10 per gallon.remember my words i dont know enough english but i want to tell you this war is going to destroy every green in peoples life.because if you ask why are we fighting you will have no answer.arabs can not accept democracy because it is not their culture.have you see any changes in somalia since the u.s. come out of somalia up to day people are fighting each other did you see any change in lebanon since the u.s.come out of lebanon.the answer is there is no change why because democracy is not their culture the same thing apply to iraq.democracy is not going to work their.dont wast you time your blood your money for nothing. peope which you are training to be againt you tomorrow.
every country which go to war suffer and it start to happen now people are suffering.at the end what is the problem of the problems in this country the answer is if you agree with me or not the our big big big big big problem problem problem is warrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Posted by: staniel | May 17, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
If you ask any politician about the meaning of the word terrorist he or she will give you a different answer than other politician.why because the meaning or the word terrorist in Egypt is no the same as the word terrorist was used in kenya and is no the same in meaning in the u.s.A. every country has different meaning.before they use to call the palastainin liberation orgnization as terrorist but today every one was engage in talking with mahmoud Abas which represent the p.l.o.
if you dont want to talk to terrorist i want to ask you why are you talking to north korea which is helping the so call terrorist countries.Libya was considered to be one of the terrorist countries but now Libya which bomb the u.s.air plan over london has relationship with all the western countries.why libya is terrorist country why we you talk to them.and every body knows that you have deal with north korea and you made a deal with libya.we have to face the reality was people are suffering economically and why people are losing their jobs and houses and paying more for every thing and that enclude the gase.and tomorrow we will end up paying 50 percant of our income in gase and lose more jobs.the real problem is going to war and continuing to supprt the war will bring more problems.two things will not meet war and economy are not friends.every big problem that people are facing now let me tell you it is because if war.when you go to this war they say to look for seapons and every day there is change in the language. with every war there are war lords which make millions out of any war and the dont want the war to finish.i want to ask you who is the war lord.
they keep on injecting fear in people by saying terrorist will attack if we do not deal with them there.that is not true.why i want to ask question how can a terrorist come and do any thing to this country.how can he or they come and attack here by what means by donkey from other countries of by boat.that is not true the security is good in this country and the security is good in the ports and in the airport terrorist will never come to this country.the terrorist which attack the country on sep 11 they do not come from the border but they come by the door having legal visa.dont listen to the politician which says that terrorist will attack the country.its politics of fear politics of fear.you are strong and safe nothing will happen to this country.they whent to war for petrol we end up paying 4 dollar for gallon.if the war continue believe me after two years you are going to pay 10 per gallon.remember my words i dont know enough english but i want to tell you this war is going to destroy every green in peoples life.because if you ask why are we fighting you will have no answer.arabs can not accept democracy because it is not their culture.have you see any changes in somalia since the u.s. come out of somalia up to day people are fighting each other did you see any change in lebanon since the u.s.come out of lebanon.the answer is there is no change why because democracy is not their culture the same thing apply to iraq.democracy is not going to work their.dont wast you time your blood your money for nothing. peope which you are training to be againt you tomorrow.
every country which go to war suffer and it start to happen now people are suffering.at the end what is the problem of the problems in this country the answer is if you agree with me or not the our big big big big big problem problem problem is warrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Posted by: staniel | May 17, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Allameri18….Not only did Dennis Kucinich drop out of the race…but Barack Obama has INDEED gotten the nod as THE MOST LIBERAL member of the Senate. And that doesn’t even count his “Absent” votes. Read some websites. How is Barack’s cousin Odinga doing now that he’s the Prime Minister of Kenya? Are the burqua factories booming yet?
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
It cost me $75.00 to fill my gas tank today. I will glady pay that every week for the next 5 years before I will vote for Obama.
Posted by: Kelly | May 17, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
ama will be a joke too. The only good thing about Obama becoming president is we will be able to tell n*****r jokes and call them Obama jokes. Like, What is Obamas idea of foreplay? Scream B*tch and I’ll cut you.
Posted by: mori | May 17, 2008 10:47:23 PM
Is American on the biggest game of punked or Jackas? Because i was sure people like you died in the 60′s. Guess not, America will forever be the laughing stock of the world. Only thing we have going for us is our military and even that is starting to crumble
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Hey America First! It’s like this. Why should Obama show his hand before he has too. Politics is like a poke you FERC’kin Idiot.
Posted by: Robert Tweeboom | May 17, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
I would have sex with george bush before I would vote for Obama.
Posted by: lewis | May 17, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Allameri18….Not only did Dennis Kucinich drop out of the race…but Barack Obama has INDEED gotten the nod as THE MOST LIBERAL member of the Senate. And that doesn’t even count his “Absent” votes. Read some websites. How is Barack’s cousin Odinga doing now that he’s the Prime Minister of Kenya? Are the burqua factories booming yet?
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008 10:49:45 PM
Where is your proof that thats his cousin just like your proof that he is muslim just like your proof that you know anything about Farrakahn? you havent shown me anything that substantiates any of that. so until you do please say something that holds more clout than “his cousin odinga”
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
NinaK: I think you may be mistaken. We had heard of terrorist during the reagan years.
Posted by: Kelly | May 17, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
My mistake NinaK
Posted by: Kelly | May 17, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Who ever gets in will have a hell of a mess and just like New Orleans it will take time to get the the nation off its self righteous butt, because We the people can make a diffrence. Vote every incubent out of office!
Posted by: Vanman | May 17, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
I’ve never seen so many racial attacks as I have on this thread. It is absolutely scary to view the prejudices surfacing to the top in regard to Obama. It makes me ashamed of (some) of my countrymen. For those who are throwing around the racial slurs: Please stop fearing what you do not understand or care to even try to understand. You make yourselves sound absolutely desperate about the big possibility of the republicans losing their strangle hold on this country. Wake up, for your own sake if not for the whole country!!!
Posted by: observer | May 17, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
The best the analysts could ever say about Obama was that he tended to do better in the debates as they went along. They never emphasized who won the debates, who knows the issues, who has the experience and who can do the job! Hillary! Just like with Bush in 2000, analysts said: “Wow, he said something coherent on foreign policy, he showed he knows something.”
If we don’t start electing people who can do the job of being president we must as well turn off the lights and say so long to America.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 17, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Liberal means- Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded
So how is this a bad thing?
Posted by: Truth Speaks | May 17, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
When did Reagan sit down with Momar Khadaffi?
Posted by: Independent | May 17, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
$600 million on a country that never attacked you, 4000 lives wasted on a cause that is hard to define, a bankrupt America no one is willing to address and you attack the messenger who at least want to attempt to change the status quo….This is a hallmark of a civilisation in decline. Obama is the only change agent however imperfect he maybe,however black he maybe, warts and all…Change or another 8 years of Washington politics and the USA would be handicapped grieviously.
Posted by: Wicks | May 17, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
ou’re ranting and raving about your candidate and you don’t even know his muslim cousin Raila Odinga is a raging Islamist in Kenya? God Save America.
Do you know his half-brother Roy Obama is a raging Islamist? What’s wrong if people discuss these matters?
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/03/obamas-militant-muslim-brother-abongo.html
Lol what? You sound as bad as Rev Wright and AIDS being used to kill blacks. Now youre just giving him family members lol. First off the only one saying that Barack is his Cousin is Raila and notice he didnt mention any of this until barack was running for president. Get outta her with that. And Roy Obama? so his father would be Baracks father right? Considering Barack was his only child. You are posing a weak argument please come up with something of substance
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
I am flagging the comment posted by “No Boma” to all on this site and especially to the monitors for action…… No Boma said the following:
“Wow! To think I thought Bush was incompetent, Obama takes THE cake.
There is no way this terrorist friendly America hating racist thinks he can actually be president.
Say it happens. Let’s pretend that Obama actually becomes the president. Let’s pretend he talks with his friends, I mean terrorists. If there is ONE, I mean one attack on us over this or any friendly state, especially Isreal. I swear I have no choice but to defend us from enemies foreign and domestic. That means that I have to dispose of the Obama. On my way to that, I have to dispose of any person I feel put him in power. It is my duty as a soldier, so help me God.
Posted by: No Boma | May 17, 2008 8:36:49 PM”
Who ever you are, you are threatening Obama’s life and Americans’ as well and I think that is unacceptable. You need to get a grip and seek help.
Hiding behind the anonymity of these blogs does not excuse your making these kinds of statements. I think what you just said is probably also illegal. Again, I am flagging this to all on this site and especially to the monitors for action……
Posted by: Paul Stewart | May 17, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
“Women” who claim they’re Hillary supporters who will vote for McCain are kind of amusing. McCain will stack the Supreme Court with nutcakes who will certainly overturn Roe v. Wade.
McCain has also cluelessly babbled that the reason for wage inequality for women was because they need more “education and training” despite the fact that the true reason is that there is still rampant wage discrimination.
No real woman with any brains would vote for that. I’ll bet a lot of these “women” who say they’ll vote for McCain have to shave their beards off every morning.
Posted by: SpaceGuy | May 17, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
ACB, as a news organization, what are the insigtful mmeasurable gains that are achieved with the tone of these comments. A good debate on the issues is sufficent for me. I know…that’s too boring.
Posted by: elmore | May 17, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Allamr18 | May 17, 2008 11:00:57 PM
=================
now you are even more disturbing. You are the evidence why BHO got so many votes. Do you know Obama went to Kenya in 2006 to campaign for this cousin??
Posted by: voteMcCaindems | May 17, 2008 11:04:21 PM
Produce evidence and i will believe you? Not that doctored picture floating on the internet. Something credible
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Obama used Ted kennedy for his political ego at age 76!
he had this seizure because of campaigning for Obama!
Too much stress!
Posted by: Shane | May 17, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
I wonder if Obama looked like Alan Keyes would black people be voting for him? Obama’s such a pretty caramel color.
Posted by: Wondering | May 17, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Don’t worry Allamr18. It’s out there and it’s coming soon. That, and Michelle Obama spewing hatred against whites from the pulpits of TUCC. I don’t think you’ll have to demand it soon.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Bonnie, your “Kenyan missionary” source has been verified to be as legitimate as the average Nigerian scam email. Anyone can look up Obama’s birth certificate and see that there is no “Mohammed” anywhere on it. When Barack Obama is elected president and (even more importantly) when the Republican/ neocon turds in Congress are flushed out of power by a Democratic landslide greater than any in modern history, you and Usama and other “Christians” of your kind (let’s not forget Huckabee) will all have to move to Kenya and hold your prayer meetings there, out of sight of the rest of us. America is sick of your kind, and your time has come and gone forever. Good riddance.
Posted by: Friday | May 17, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
What happened with Iran under Clinton? Diplomacy, and of course it worked very well. What happened under Bush? A greed/ arrogance based war for profit right in Iran’s backyard, confirming every fear they’re ever had about the US. This is the Bush/Cheney plan, provoke every potential enemy to war. In the end, they make trillions, this is a fact. Instead of this garbage about whether it’s appropriate to negotiate with Iran, how about focusing on the fact that this situation only exists because of the Neocons. McCain, like Bush, will ignore what created this situation and simply confirm Iran’s status as part of an Axis of Evil…. And the Uranium refining continues…
Posted by: John | May 17, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha…yes, LMAO, McCain is this best you repubs have come up with? Ha,ha,ha… I guess Rove was trying to choose the least “damage to the party” candidate to take the fall. November can’t get her quick enough. Really is pathetic when you think about what has happened to our great country. China holding a large credit card for us, a war that has been a major mistake and blemish on our standing with other major countries and a debt that I really question if we’ll ever be able to dig our way out of. This pathetic loser of a president will go down in history as the force that almost brought this country down. But hopefully a major change will bring us back to a country that is known for strength, compassion and intelligence.
Posted by: Fliz | May 17, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Women are leaving the DNC!
I have received an email too!
I am NOT going to vote for Obama , he does not share my values!
Posted by: Diane | May 17, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Facist Alert is a terrorist. I just came back from a movie and dinner after 4 hours and he is still basement blogging. His name is on every other post. Better get up and move around before you lay an egg.
Posted by: Independent | May 17, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
I don’t find any part of Obama’s campaign for his cousin Odinga’s candidacy for the presidency in Kenya funny. There are video tapes, mailers, and slogans that are like Barack’s that are circulating through America now. This is the October surprise. He is supporting his cousin who wants to change the Democratic constitution to Muslim Sharia law. Obama has pulled a total charade on America.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
The first post from “AMERICA FIRST” shows the ignorance of the poster. The euphemism of the name, which should be “more of the same old crap from the right” explains it all. By the way, let us not forget that Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld should be in prison awaiting execution for war crimes, treason, torture, violations of international law, and violations of the U. S. Constitution.
Posted by: GOPHater | May 17, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Vote: Thats nowhere near campaigning. Ive seen those, and none of it has been substantiated. The guy is from the same tribe as his father whom he hasnt seen since he was 2. Come on youve got to do better than that. And whoever took a shot at Michelle is pretty low life as well. Attacking women the American way huh
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
The first post from “AMERICA FIRST” shows the ignorance of the poster. The euphemism of the name, which should be “more of the same old crap from the right” explains it all. By the way, let us not forget that Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld should be in prison awaiting execution for war crimes, treason, torture, violations of international law, and violations of the U. S. Constitution.
Posted by: GOPHater | May 17, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
If it is so innocent…as an American voter….I WANT TO SEE BARACK CAMPAIGNING FOR ODINGA! Why should he try to not show us what he was supporting a year ago?
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
hello every bloggers,
you guys seem to miss the fundamental part. Obama says he is not talking with the terrorists at all. If anybody body doubts then see the obama speech at Sioux Falls, he said that he does not negotiate with Hamas, a terrorist organization. As far as you are concerned with Iran, he said he is gonna imply a ” tough diplomacy.” Remember everyone, North Korea got a atom bomb because of Bush’s failure to talk with them.Afterall, talking with tough diplomacy is not a bad idea.
Posted by: suren | May 17, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
You cannot play “my way or the highway” in international diplomacy, something that has led to FAILED international diplomatic policies by the Bush administration. You cannot ignore or refuse a open diolog with your enemies. Remember the Cuban missle crisis? The Eisenhower diplomacy was to refuse to deal with any of the major Soviet policies except in a very limited way. It almost led to a nuclear was. Thank God, JFK and saner head prevailed. A hot line directly to our enemies was then installed. Being tortured as a POW, McCain showed us the stuff he was made of..tough as nails. He is, however, not a diplomat. We do not need an externtion of policies that have lead to war, a declining economy, a massive debt and a continuation of divisive partisan politics. McCain has bet his presidential bid on support of the conservative right wing rallying to himas they did Bush. If elected he will have to repay them with the samepeople in places of leadership that has led to our national problems. Obama may, or mat not be the answer, BUT, he is willing to try new things and more importantly get away from the Bush administration ruinous policies.
Remember, we are BUYING MILLIONS of barrels of oils from thie “terrorist country of Iran. Also remember that most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi’s…so who did we invade.
The Bush administration has alienated countries like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Venezuela and even Mexico through one disasterous policy after the next.
These countries who produce around 70 percent of the oil we import may just decide to tell The US to srew off we’ll just sell our oil to India and China. I don’t have to tell you what would happen under that scenario.
Like somebody’s bitch we’ll keep “sucking their pipe..line” cuz we need their oil, we just don’t wanna talk to them til they cut us off.
Posted by: B-Caps | May 17, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Obama could be cousins with mickey mouse, but i truly believe, Bush is brothers with pure evil, hiding behind his christian values. I do not value anyone’s opinion who wants to keep America on the same course of George Bush. If you like McCain so much, stop complaining about Bush. I believe he has all kind of devils advising him… I mean look at us. America’s a joke and four more years is enough time to do us in. People say Obama doesn’t have experience, well, here’s a fact for you. He does, and he has more experience than Abraham Lincoln. A person with a vision is more priceless than worthless experience anyday, just look at bush… then look at john and say, what has he done? Truthfully…NOTHING
Posted by: Who Cares anyway? | May 17, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Diane @
I agree, Obama has NO values!
He is a liar!
He is not presidential at all!
I saw him at TV today , looks very sloppy! Tired and dirty, he probably does not take a shower everyday either since Muslims don’t!
Posted by: Tom, | May 17, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Diane @
I agree, Obama has NO values!
He is a liar!
He is not presidential at all!
I saw him at TV today , looks very sloppy! Tired and dirty, he probably does not take a shower everyday either since Muslims don’t!
Posted by: Tom, | May 17, 2008 11:23:28 PM
Extremely disheartening and discouraging. You should have more respect than that of people its a true testament as to why america is behind in every measurable category in the world
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 17, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Like him or not, Obama is a much better alternative to four more years of Bush’s filthy lies and war, which McWar will continue if elected.
Posted by: Sir Topham Hat | May 17, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
John McCain is Not george Bush at all!
He was going to run with John Kerry in 2004!
John McCain will get 65% of Hillary supporters votes but since he is not considered as a conservative republican, he may not get enough republicans to go out and vote for him!
he needs a conservative VP who understands the economy!
McCain is NOT Bush at all!
Posted by: John, | May 17, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
He never went to Kenya to campaign for Mickey Mouse. He went to campaign for Odinga, who wants to make Keny a subject to Sharia (Muslim) law. I respect Muslim people in America, but I don’t think they shoud represent our country as our voice in the world.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
I have turned in the post by “no boma” to the FBI and the CIA. This person is crazy and is threatening an American running for President. He will be exposed via his IP address. Just “another crazy right-winger” doesn’t cut it with his/her post.
Posted by: GOPHater | May 17, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
To PhillyPaul. Thanks for the feedback. How does one make sure that the monitors get this feedback? Is there actually even a monitor on this site – I have assumed so given it is ABC news who sponsors the site and has its name all over it? Surely they can’t be associated with this type of thing?
I agree with your comments about someone following up on this poster. Even if its a prankster, he deserves to be caught. If he is real and as delusioned as he seems, he needs to be found, contained and given whatever help he needs….
Posted by: Paul Stewart | May 17, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Let’s be honest, we can debate the right or wrong way to handle the current situation facing our nation until the cows come home. What we cannot debate is that Bush’s opinion should carry absolutley no weight. Look at his record.
Posted by: eric | May 17, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Despite of I am not very much interested in John McCain, he is much beter than Obama dude!
I would not even put Obama to run my candy store forget about presidency!
My vote will go for Mccain too!
Too bad Hillary did not amke it! I could have voted for her!
Posted by: Johnatan | May 17, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Something big is about to drop. I’m sure you all have noticed Michelle Obama has been out the picture lately. Check out this link. http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=1028
Posted by: Margaret | May 17, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Hey, has anyone heard any of Obama’s policies??? I haven’t, and I follow this stuff pretty closely. All he does is compare McCain to Bush and trash everything they have to say. Just like the dem’s in congress he’s trying to get elected with the whole “Change” routine. Do you all remember Pelosi’s “100 days of change” What was changed????????? Nothing!!!! The democrats do nothing but put down other’s ideas while coming up with NOTHING themselves. You all will be brought out in the debates. I can’t wait. Fakes!!!!!
Posted by: Ryan | May 17, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I think it’s high time to round up the racists of America and ship them off to some faraway island.
Posted by: Mr. No Nonsense | May 17, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
What is it that you guys need monitored? Obamaniacs are so thin-skinned.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Reagan- strategy bankrupt Russia by having a nuclear arms race. It works!
Terrorist strategy- Bankrupt America with a false terrorist threat. Close to working.
Now vote Democrat in 2008 and send a loving message to the Republicans!
Good job voters so far the 3 special elections were grand***
If our gov’t doesn’t 9/11 us again (Yes Mr. Bush was in the mix with Bin Laden) we’ll be alright.
Posted by: Love America First | May 17, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
The republican girls are hotter than the Obama girls
Posted by: mike | May 17, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Another pastor talks at a radio show abaout barrack Obama!
lets listen!
rense_Pastor_J_Manning_051208
Posted by: Jacob | May 17, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Another pastor talks at a radio show abaout barrack Obama!
lets listen!
rense_Pastor_J_Manning_051208
Posted by: Jacob | May 17, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Remember Bubba Clinton in the 1990’s his diplomacy is a direct result in North Korea’s ability to enrich uranium, by being truly ignorant of their true intentions in transferring our help in building their nuclear enrichment bomb plants.
Oh and why is it China is where it is at today (shooting down satellites) It was Bubba who authorized the transfer of advanced gyro avionics to China in hopes of peaceful space exploration. Wrong again!
Obama will be talking to these states of deception? Sounds like history repeating itself!
Democrats and Republicans have sold us all out and are causing the very arguments we are waging now!
Posted by: David | May 17, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
am a Hillary supporter, who will be supporting John McCain if Obama gets the nomination. I am one of the big fundraisers for Hillary Clinton!
We are all for McCain in 2008!
Hillary 2012!
Obama can not win, Hillary was right!
because we won’t back him!
he will get his lesson! he is an opporturnutist!
I am glad that you are a Hillary big supporter. GOD BLESS OBAMA AND HIS CAMPAIGN OBAMA HAS PLENTY OF MONEY 40 MILLION AND THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES IS STILL SUPPORTING HIM. WHY CANT YOU GIVE HILLARY 40 MILLION DOLLARS IF YOU ARE SUCH A BIG SUPPORTER. HE DOES NOT NEED YOUR AND YOUR FRIENDS VOTE TO WIN. WE ARE PRAYING FOR HIM AND GOD HAS ALL THE MONEY HE NEED AND SUPPORT. I HOPE YOU PRAY LIKE WE DO PRAYER IS POWERFUL I KNOW I PRACTICE IT EVERYDAY. I HAVE FRIENDS PRAYING FOR HIM AND HIS CAMPAIGN
Posted by: Wanda | May 17, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
What I find so amusing is that the Obama supporters critisize McCain but yet they played right into the republican strategy. Republicans have found a way to get in another 4 years. Rememeber the gamnes show THE WEAKEST LINK?
Posted by: kevin | May 17, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
am a Hillary supporter, who will be supporting John McCain if Obama gets the nomination. I am one of the big fundraisers for Hillary Clinton!
We are all for McCain in 2008!
Hillary 2012!
Obama can not win, Hillary was right!
because we won’t back him!
he will get his lesson! he is an opporturnutist!
I am glad that you are a Hillary big supporter. GOD BLESS OBAMA AND HIS CAMPAIGN OBAMA HAS PLENTY OF MONEY 40 MILLION AND THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES IS STILL SUPPORTING HIM. WHY CANT YOU GIVE HILLARY 40 MILLION DOLLARS IF YOU ARE SUCH A BIG SUPPORTER. HE DOES NOT NEED YOUR AND YOUR FRIENDS VOTE TO WIN. WE ARE PRAYING FOR HIM AND GOD HAS ALL THE MONEY HE NEED AND SUPPORT. I HOPE YOU PRAY LIKE WE DO PRAYER IS POWERFUL I KNOW I PRACTICE IT EVERYDAY. I HAVE FRIENDS PRAYING FOR HIM AND HIS CAMPAIGN
Posted by: Wanda | May 17, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
I don’t know what is worse: Bush’s lies or the people who continue to spew them. You ReTHUGlican operatives should be ashamed of yourselves!
Posted by: You know who you are | May 17, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Facist Alert. How long will take that monstrosity to hatch that you just laid you vulture! You can dish it out, but certainly can’t take it. Lol. I’m going to vote Obama in just to watch him fall on his face. He will be an utter and an even worse failure than Carter, and we’ll get another Reagan for eight years. And no, I am not white, but Hispanic you skeeny gringó.
Posted by: Independent | May 17, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
If you truly have supported Hillary, how can you vote for McCain when the one single issue Hillary is sincerely passionate about is universal health care?
McCain will never allow this to happen.
Democrats will make sure it happens. Loyalty with no thought to the real purpose of your cause is empty. Her real cause is universal health care. Only a Democrat will do this.
I also do not understand the fear of an Obama presidency. He will not be a dictator. We will have our Constitution, and branches of government. What is everyone so afraid of? We have permitted Bush to remain in office after 7 years of failed foreign and domestic policy. If those of you who are so fearful of Obama, you will always have the rule of law. Bill Clinton was impeached for lying. Bush should have been impeached for lying.
Obama could be impeached as well. Calm down…This is America – a democracy.
Posted by: jg | May 17, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
After Larry Siclair now Pastor J Manning calls Obama a bisexual!
Go and google it!
Pastor J Manning
Posted by: Jacob | May 17, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
There are way too many republicans here to start trouble with the dems. Or maybe it’s just one that keeps changind their id. Hope everyone can see that.
Posted by: d | May 17, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
I know a lot of Democrats who are disappointed that Hilary probably isn’t going to win the nomination. Even though Obama isn’t their first choice, there’s now way they would consider McCain over Obama. It’s pretty obvious that McCain is Bush Lite and you’d be a fool to vote for him!
Posted by: Unity | May 17, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
hey Wanda!
Obama got all that money from the terrorist countries illegally!
He must show his campaign donations to the American people!
His donors turned to be Hamas suicide bombers in Gaza!
Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Iran!
Are you still glad?
McCain for president!
Posted by: Jacob | May 17, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Barack Obama has not mentioned Kenya ONE TIME in his 15 + month campaign for the presidency. It is becasue he does not want Americans to know about his cousin Odinga who ran (and lost) the presidency in Kenya because he wanted to change Kenya’s democratic constitution to iclude Sharia (Islamic) law.) It’s not against American law to be a Muslim….but Barack should at least admit he is a follower of Islam if he wants to be the President of the USA.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Jacob what about Hillary’s lesbian ties. Have you heard about those.
Posted by: ww | May 17, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Obama is clueless! How can he compare Kennedy’s and Reagan’s approach to the situations then and the world we now live in? The guy is an idiot along with the rest of the Democratic left wing morons that want to appease the enemy. I’m telling you, these idiots are no different from the greeks of old.
Posted by: Mike | May 17, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
suburbandad81:
After Fort Sumpter, did Lincoln negotiate with Jefferson Davis before he had the Confederacy on the ropes, or did he prosecute the war to its fullest extent?
Did Roosevelt negotiate with Hitler and Tojo after Pearl Harbor? Did Truman negotiate with them, or did he demand unconditional surrender?
Madison negotiated with the British to end the War of 1812. But it was the British negotiating from a position of strength, not the Americans, and we were lucky the British still had issues to deal with back in Europe.
Wilson and the Allied Powers negotiated with Germany before victory was achieved, resulting in an armistice that ultimately caused World War II.
We also negotiated our way out of Korea and Vietnam. In Korea, negotiations went nowhere until there was a military stalemate, at which point the parties agreed to status quo ante. In Vietnam, we negotiated the Paris Peace Accord allowing us to leave, and with the understanding that South Vietnam would be allowed self-determination. We had no power to enforce the agreement, and look what happened.
Carter attempted negotiations with Iran during the Hostage Crisis, but after the failed rescue attempt, and without any other leverage, those negotiations went nowhere until the Algiers Accords where we traded money for hostages.
The Reagan Administration dealt with Iran secretly as part of Iran-Contra, but does Obama really want to hang his hat on that one after all the fuss it raised?
The point is, Presidents that have successfully negotiated with unfriendly nations have always done so from a position of strength. Kennedy threatened nuclear war to get the missiles out of Cuba. Reagan offered the Soviets a chance to avoid economic collapse from a prolonged arms race. By contrast, when Presidents have sat down with an unfriendly nation without any leverage, it has always been in situations of resignation, exhaustion, desperation or a combination of all three (War of 1812, Korea, Vietnam, Iran Hostage Crisis). Which of these situations are we in now to justify unconditional talks with Al Qaeda and Hamas?
Posted by: vancav | May 17, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
pgh voter why would Obama mention Kenya. What does that have to do with runnning for president.
Posted by: d | May 17, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
“Now is the time our brothers and sisters will rise and no longer will white america hold us down.”
A typical white hater Obama supprter!
You are a reason for so many democrats for why we will vote for McCain!
Posted by: Jacob | May 17, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
If you vote for mccain be ready to cut your relationship with the gase stations and start to get ready for using your camel and donkey and horses.
Posted by: staniel | May 17, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Obama is going to whip McCain in the debates, knock him out of his wheelchair. Can’t wait to see that!
Posted by: Can't wait | May 17, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
I hate white people! michelle Obama is my soul! She gives it to you all white Americans!
Stick it to your …..
Obama 2008!
Slave white America!
Posted by: Albert | May 17, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
If you vote for mccain be ready to cut your relationship with the gase stations and start to get ready for using your camel and donkey and horses.
Posted by: staniel | May 17, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
D – We know absolutely nothing else about him. It would at least let us know what he’s been up to since that “anti-Iraq war” speech that supposedly propelled him to the limelight.
Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 17, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Obama will increase your taxes America!
He is worse than Hillary!
He will double your capital gains taxes, income taxes and payroll taxes to give to his refugees!
McCain in 2008!
Posted by: Sandy | May 17, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
PhillyPaul- It’s up there at 8:36 pm.. No Boma is the name used. You can control F to find it… and can always ctl screenprint to copy it into an email. Hope this helps.
Posted by: whatever | May 18, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
If Obama has his way all of that money will go to Kenya so they don’t have to rub sticks together for fire. The American dollar is worth about 62 Kenyan Shillings. Kenyas will be able to benefit from our taxes high and they will get natural gas lines and matches.
Posted by: larry | May 18, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
JFK was a good president. The only one that should have a problem with JFK is Jacky O since he was chasing so many other women behind her back.
Posted by: huh | May 18, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
I am losing faith in America!
First Bush was elected (fool me once). Bush was re-elected (fool me twice). You don’t get fooled again … unless you vote for McCain.
Are Americans really that stupid? Please prove me wrong!
Posted by: Naysayer | May 18, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
MORI, you will have so many regrets because of your racist rants towards blacks. You and many like you will suffer when Obama is president.
Posted by: Kenya | May 18, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Yeah and Kennedy wasn’t endorsed by Castro. Why does Hamas endorse you, Obama???
He attends a racist church for 20 years, and yet everyone that doesn’t support him is a racist. I can’t wait to vote against this empty-suited loser.
Posted by: Mack | May 18, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
But then again it is the same stupid people voting for Obama that voted for Bush.
Posted by: Naysayer | May 18, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Wanda!
we can pay Hillary’s debt however we are all maxed out!
All of her big donors are asking Hillary to run as an independant and leave the Democratic Party, so we can raise money again and see her to the White House as our president!
Clearly many of us will not support Obama!
is that enough!
By the way, Obama will need your prays because he is set to loose this election in November to John McCain by the huge help o9f Hillary supporters!!!
Even if both Billa and Hillary would endorse him and ask us, we still won’t vote for him!
Posted by: Donna | May 18, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
It is funny how the Obama supporters call the Clinton supporters, uneducated, when they are the ones that can not spell.
Posted by: NEXT | May 18, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Mack why do so many republicans say “empty suit” when referring to Obama. You can tell who you really are.
Posted by: d | May 18, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
CYPHER..”Goes to show that Affirmative Action educations are not worth much”
Cypher, pls try and convince me that your comment is not racist……..cos I really cannot fanthom the relationship btw the Foreign policy discussion we are having on this board and affirmative action education.
from your comment looks like whatever education you had (if any) didnt amount to much either.
Posted by: arure | May 18, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
God Bless our lord and savior George W. Bush. For without him, we would be slaves to the unholy gays, abortionists and liberals who threaten America.
John McCain is the one true disciple of George Bush, and only he can deliver us from the unholy liberal coalition that threatens to destroy America.
The sun cannot set on the American Empire, and it is the duty of everyone who professes to love America to send their children (male or female) to the military so that they may help George Bush’s war, and bring us to salvation.
For all you people who use John McCain’s name in vain, you will surely rot in hell for your blasphemy.
In Bush’s name, Amen.
Posted by: David (Austin Tx) | May 18, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Thank to DNC, another 4 years of Republicans is our destiny!
DNC is responsible for this!
Obama won’t win he is unelectable!
Posted by: shan | May 18, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
I don’t need to say anything about Obama comparing himself to Carter, Nixon, et al…enough has been said to qualify that you can’t compare Iran and Syria to the Soviet Union and China, and that meeting with the leader of a terrorist state legitimizes that terrorist state.
Someone mentioned the state of the economy being the real issue; it is. However, how will Obama fix/help the economy? He’ll raise taxes to pay for his plans, and from what I’ve gathered, the high taxes will start around $75k (yes, I’ve read through Obama’s website, so don’t say I’m not “educated” on the issue.). He’ll tax corporations to the point they’ll move to another country, and move more jobs. He’ll create more welfare programs that will bankrupt social security and all other similar programs, and he seems likely to pull funding from the military (after he pulls out of Iraq) to cut costs and provide money for said social programs. Of course, I could be wrong, but how would I know – Obama hasn’t said anything about how he’ll pay for any of these things, other than raise taxes. I’d love to see my paycheck cut to less than $1k so I can provide health care and unemployment for the bum who won’t get a job because of said unemployment payment!
Obama is naive and foolish, and his policies teeter on the edge of communism/socialism. His associations make me nervous, as they show bad judgement; his diplomatic policy is naive at best, and I’m not sure what the guy is actually saying – he hides a lot in his speeches by using chants and things that energize a crowd. Hitler did that…but so did MLK. I’m leaning towards Hitler due to his economic policies.
Oh, I can hear it now: I’m racist, I’m an idiot republican (I’m independent), I’m stupid and uneducated (my degree is in the liberal arts and I’m working on my MBA in finance), I hate muslims (I have several good friends from Bosnia).
This should be interesting…
Posted by: Shane H. | May 18, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Has the KKK endorsed McCain yet? Sounds like a couple people on here might be qualified to know!
Posted by: Let me know | May 18, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
How can you say Hillary voters voted for Bush? I think Bush voters voted for Bush. Black voters voted for Obama. Add in far left liberals and teenagers and you have Obama nominated. People who think it’ll be so cool to elect a black president are to blame for this mess. Not that I like Clinton but I would rather risk a Clinton presidnecy than an Obama one.
Posted by: larry | May 18, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
hey Obama!
I am a republican and voted for Obama in Idaho!
It was our strategy to get rid of Hillary in this race,
How do you think barrack hussein obama won the Red states?
When Obama won 11 times in Feb and March , it was our votes! As soon as Mit Romney dropped out, his supporters went for Obama to block Hillary! We follow our party’s rules! We are a great team and will win again!
I knew you Obama supprters are retarded to buy it!
We than voted for Hillary too at the end because we need her supporters at our side, so we wanted a close race, and angry Hill supporters!
We won, Republicans trapped you all!
Now, we got rid of hillary and he is unelectable!
LOL
Posted by: Melinda | May 18, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
hey Obama!
I am a republican and voted for Obama in Idaho!
It was our strategy to get rid of Hillary in this race,
How do you think barrack hussein obama won the Red states?
When Obama won 11 times in Feb and March , it was our votes! As soon as Mit Romney dropped out, his supporters went for Obama to block Hillary! We follow our party’s rules! We are a great team and will win again!
I knew you Obama supporters are retarded to buy it!
We than voted for Hillary too at the end because we need her supporters at our side, so we wanted a close race, and angry Hill supporters!
We won, Republicans trapped you all!
Now, we got rid of hillary and he is unelectable!
LOL
Posted by: Melinda | May 18, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
If the empty-suit fits, wear it. He is all rhetoric and no substance. He has done nothing to deserve to be a Senator, let alone President of the United States. He lacks character and judgment, based on his support and attendance of a racist church for 20 years. I’ve voted Democrat since I’ve been voting, although if Obama is the nominee, I will either be voting Republican, Independent or writing in Hillary.
Posted by: Mack | May 18, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
“Hate, racism and fear; these are the politics of ignorance” …..
and of OBAMA.
*****
As for me, “GIVE ‘ME HELL, HILLARY!!!”
Posted by: questioner | May 18, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Some people are defending Obama’s appeasement policies by saying it is similar to Nixon going to China when, in truth, there is no parallel. When Richard Nixon met Chinese leaders, both the US and the Chinese were already committed to renewing relations as a hedge against Soviet power. In Iran, there is still an internal power struggle over whether to engage fully with the US “the Great Satan”.
Further, the US got the short end of the stick by taking the approach of talking to China without any clear preconditions. China now is surpassing the US in manufacturing and as a result the US has lost countless manufacturing jobs to China. The US gave away a lot our our technology to China and now China is starting to out pace the US in technology as well. So using Nixon meeting with China as a positive example of negotiating with an enemy without preconditions just does not fly. Truth,is the party that goes into a meeting without any clear preconditions is most often at a disadvantage and thus more likely to come out the loser.
What is worse is that the example Obama used to defend his approach was untrue. Obama stated that Kennedy met with Khrushchev during the Cuban Missile crisis. Wronge, Khrushchev met with Kennedy in Vienna on June 4, 1961, 15 months prior to the Cuban Missile Crisis that occurred from October 18-29, 1962. If Obama wants an accurate historical analogue of Obama’s idea to meet with no preconditions with anti-American dictators such as Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad it would be the trip British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and French premier Eduoard Daladier took to Munich in September of 1938 to negotiate “peace in our time” with Adolf Hitler. History shows that that didn’t work out so well. But maybe Obama is not aware of this fact given his obvious lack historical knowledge.
Posted by: Sam | May 18, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
I got an email from HCFCIN group calling for Hillary to run independant!
They have
1 millionfourthousandandtwentytwo members and they all say they will vote for McCain and leave the Democratic Party if Obama is gets the nomination!
I am thinking about joining to them!
Is this a signal of Hillary Clinton’s independant presidential candidacy?
Posted by: Ed | May 18, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Kojo:
Selective memory? Didn’t the Brits crack down on the IRA, force a ceasefire in 1994, and require Sinn Fein to renounce violence before engaging in serious negotiations? Before accusing Americans of arrogance and ignorance, you should remember there are an awful lot of expatriots who still follow the news from the Olde Sodde.
Allamr18:
Of course MLK, Ghandi, Tutu and Mandela negotiated with their oppressors, and they are rightfully praised for doing so. But your comparing apples and oranges. All four were opposing their own governments, and all four had political power in one form or another. MLK not only nhad the support of the black community, but also had numerous allies in the white community, even in the deep south. The British could not run India when its population engaged in widespread civil disobediance. The South Africans had a similar problem. Moreover, MLK and Ghandi benefitted from relatively benevolent governments, while South Africa was vulnerable to international sanctions.
By contrast, when we sit down unconditionally with Al Qaeda and Hamas, what message are we sending? That we are willing to reward their violence with concessions? The only thing that will insure is more demands and more violence.
Posted by: vancav | May 18, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
I have never thought that I would have to vote for a Republican some day in my life!
well, it is happening! If Obama gets this nomination I am going for Mccain!
Thanks God it is McCain what would I do if I had to make a choice between Romney and Obama or Huckabe and Obama?
HUH???
Posted by: Bill | May 18, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
JFK was not your mentor, the racist reverend Wright was.
Posted by: Mack | May 18, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
“Hey Shaney boy…we are a Socialist state….there is no such thing as Capitalism….only various shades of Socialism. Given you are getting a degree in finance you must realize at this point that there are micro-economies. There is one economy for the rich and another for everyone else, with different economic graditions within each group which are also conditioned on the micro-economies of geography and standard of living. First thing is to stop the war, cut about 3 percent of the defense budget and then pay for everything without raising taxes. Hell, cut 10 percent of the defense budget. All we really need to beat terrorists is a lock on cockpit doors and a leather coat to stop the cut of a box cutter….the whole war on terror is an excuse to continue the cash cow of the military industrial complex created during the cold war.”
Yeah, I know we’re a socialist state…I didn’t think anyone posting in this blog would actually be aware of that. Nice! I just don’t like how we’re moving towards a welfare/communist state.
I’m aware of microeconomics and the different levels of it, yes. Again, surprised someone actually is aware of this; it seems like these people are more along the lines of “Tax the rich until they’re poor!” and “Corporations are evil…take their money even though their profits are paying for my retirement!”
Before reducing the defense budget, we need to have a thorough overhaul of what we want to pay for in regards to defense; due to the nature of the world and the way wars are being faught, we could probably scrap a lot of the technology and go for more convential, infantry based defenses…and walls along both our borders would be good.
Here’s an idea that I like…reduce the defense budget, end social security (money is contributed to individual retirement account instead – that is what social security was intended for, individual retirement, not welfare programs), rescind the patriot act, secure our borders and fix the immigration issue, adjust the way universities are treated in regard to tax exempt status (Harvard and their management company, for example), get the fed to raise rates to a nice 5% rate, go back to the gold standard, and lower taxes for everyone to a nice, flat tax: you make more, you pay more.
Posted by: Shane H. | May 18, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Wanda | May 17, 2008 11:43:43 PM:
G-D has nothing to do with an election in which one of the candidate is allowed to buy the delegates votes for the nominee.
The crooked DNC, if it permits this purpetrator of hate, racism and fear” to continue this travesty, deserves the strong boot in the ass it’s going to receive from justifiably irate Clinton Supporters.
I support this post!
Posted by: EARFUL | May 18, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Hey Debbie:
I read your posts. You strike me as not very bright.
I suppose it takes all types to make up the human race, so I’ll try and forgive the fact that when it came to brains and judgment, God decided to withhold those from you. But, in case you haven’t gotten yet, I’ll say it again using other words: You’re a SUB-NORMAL. And judging from many of the other comments on this post, I can see that you are not alone. America is full of them. I mean, the re-election of George Bush in 2004, and the fact that he came close enough in the popular vote to steal it in 2000, should have taught me this already. Nonetheless, it never ceases to amaze me when I encounter it.
Posted by: Joe | May 18, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
People are so Stupid! Thats exactly why we had 9/11, and thats exactly why if the republicans win again, we are going to have another 9/11. Watch and see!
Posted by: liz | May 18, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Melinda | May 18, 2008 12:22:08 AM
Melinda,
Is what you wrote about a being a Republican who voted for Obama just so that Hillary would lose the election?
Posted by: EARFUL | May 18, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
All you anti-Obama bloggers should quit using this forum as some kind of therapy. yeah you cant stand him…….so why not be patient Nov is round the corner then you can FREELY vote for Mcain….the way some of you sound its like someone is dragging you to the polling booth to vote for Obama.
Remember these blogs are bein read from all corners of the world and some of these digusting blogs are making americans look like a bunch of shallow and Ignorant people.
Posted by: arure | May 18, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
After reading these comments, I believe most of thyem are posted by the SWIFT BOATERS or their friends – just like they vilified Kerry in 2004.
it is going to get ugly folks – prepare for the worst from the reich wing loonie fringe.
Posted by: Ed Saltaire | May 18, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am
“By the same token I can say that Obama’s heavy drug use when he was younger has impaired his mental capacities, to the point where he said he would meet unconditionally with the head of Iran.”AllamR
Another SUB-NORMAL speaks.
You want to talk about drug use, how about all the years of alcohol abuse Bush engaged in, or all the times HE USED COCAINE in his youthful years? How’s his “judgment” worked out or proven itself during the last 7 years?
Because these facts do not compute with you, YOU ARE WORTHY OF MY CONTEMPT.
My God, the imbibers of corporate media news (and ABC News is as “corporate media” as they come), are truly the stupid and uninformed ones in America. You pathetic morons.
Posted by: Joe | May 18, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
What experience does Obama have when it comes to foreign policy? Well Obama does have one and why the MSM is not highlighting it is very curious.
Obama’s foreign policy experience to date was campaigning for his cousin Odinga. Odinga is a convicted felon in Kenya. Obama’s cousin, Odinga is a Marxist revolutionary who is associated with a group of Islamo-fascist political operatives who were responsible for raping and looting and burning black women and children alive in their church pews. Obama’s cousin is now co-Prime Minister Odinga and is responsible for displacing hundreds of thousands of refugees, burning crops to the point where Kenyans are starving and destabilized a pro-Western ally bordered with Islamo-fascist Somalia.
So Obama does have one example of foreign policy experience and the MSM needs to ask Obama to explain and justify his foreign policy allegiance with his cousin Odinga.
Posted by: Jerrry | May 18, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
I would vote for Jeremiah Wright
before I’d vote for BOzo.!
Since I don’t have that option
I will Happily
VOTE FOR HILLARY
she is STILL in the race, you know!
Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | May 18, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
McCain is embracing Bushes failed policies and his big tax breaks for the wealthy. I want more taxes on the wealthy not less. Bush has done much damage to our country and ruined it’s image in less then eight years. McCain will continue down this path of doom and further damage the US with failed Bush blunders.
Posted by: AJ | May 18, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
would someone answer me why 1 vote of super D = to about 100,000 vote of the rest of us?? Why do SuperD has an option to change their vote back and forth as they see fit and the people don’t have a choice to take their votes back?? DNC is a bunch of morons!! they are the reason for Democrats to be doomed. Who would come up with Super D ideas?? let’s the bigwits decide the nominee and not the people. This is your democracy, Democrats?? I’m glad I didn’t yet declare myself as a Democrat.
Posted by: wilson | May 18, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
Republicans are the KKK. They come in here and spew racist rants…
Hannity’s Racist Mentor HAL TURNER and Rush are KKK card members
Hannity admits to hating Black People..
Karl Rove is the Supreme KKK leader.
McCain’s Racist Pastors Rod Parsley and John Hagee are KKK card members..
Mccain never wanted MLK Holiday in AZ.
This explains it all
EXPOSED!!!!!
Posted by: TRUTH HURTS | May 18, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
lol you republicans are cracking me up.
Posted by: d | May 18, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Obama is as much as a flip flopper as his ears are. HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE PAIN FOR YOU!!!!!!! SAVE US
Posted by: NEXT | May 18, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
bho mother was an aithiest.wow does he have a muslin pin on.
Posted by: delite820 | May 18, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
It’s a good idea and has precedent. Obama should face them down and get them in line. Proper channels could be observed, and perhaps only surrogates at first, but yes, it’s basically a good idea. Give ‘em he11, Barack.
Posted by: hey Scoob | May 18, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
nohussein, and what about the supreme court. I guess you don’t care about that.
Posted by: al | May 18, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
The NYTimes story about how he’s been using his wife’s corporate plane for his campaign using a slightly dodgy campaign finance carve-out
What kind of judges McCain would appoint to the Supreme Court, and what their agenda might be (hint: To overturn Roe v. Wade, for starters
Who pays for Meghan McCain and the McCain Blogette team? Per the AP, “‘McCain Blogette’ is independent from the campaign. So independent, the campaign said it could not answer who pays for Meghan and her two friends to travel on campaign planes and buses.”
What, exactly, in the John Hagee oeuvre (Catholicism as “Great Whore,” women with PMS as Dobermans/terrorists, Katrina as punishment for a Gay Pride parade in New Orleans, having a ‘slave sale’) does McCain support, and how, exactly, he thinks Hagee “supports what I stand for and believe in.”
McCain’s sudden claims to environmentalism vs. his record of skipping “every one of the 15 votes that the League of Conservation Voters deemed critical measures for the environment, including votes where the Arizona Senator’s yea would have meant passage by a single-vote margin,” according to the Daily Green (via C&L).
Whether the media has overblown his foreign policy acumen and leadership, given his repeated foreign policy gaffes.
Posted by: TRUTH HURTS | May 18, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Obama is a good candidate and has received millions of votes and endorsements of the highest level, from everywhere in the country. He has a good idea.
Posted by: hey Scoob | May 18, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
I thought Obama was going to be weak but now I see he is stronger than Mccain and Bush combined. If Hilary does not come through, It is Obama all the way. No Mccain-Bush Please
Posted by: jayjay | May 18, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
Obama’s judgment has already been put to the test and passed. When McCain wanted the gas tax holiday, Obama pointed out that it was a gimmick. over 200 economists agreed with him.
Posted by: hey Scoob | May 18, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
I see a candidate that will attack our enemies the way he has attacked Mccain-Bush. That guy is really from the South south of Chicago. The home of the toughest men.
Posted by: jayjay | May 18, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
So many misinformed idiots!
Posted by: Rob A. | May 18, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
hahahahaha ”eyes extremely wide open.”
Yes it does…..LOL!!!!
Posted by: NEXT | May 18, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
This is a great debate to have for Obama. It just shows how much McCain represents four more years of George W. Bush’s failures.
Barack Obama will bring diplomacy & thoughtfulness back to the White House!
Every thinking voter is voting Obama 2008. McCain is unthinkable. 4 more years of Bush is absolutely unthinkable!
Posted by: Music Guy | May 18, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
What is “Gary Ware” smoking? I think he needs to put down the pipe and actually read and listen to the candidates rather than make up or repeat stuff that not even the Republicans believe, they only want to fool people (Evangelicals) into voting for them, then payback by proposing bans on bills that they know won’t pass (abortion, Gay rights etc.) then people like “Gary” vote for them and they shaft the country, get rich (Haleburton, Big Oil) and do it again in 4 years! WAKE UP! Gary, you are a grown man, stop allowing them to treat you like a lap dog!
Posted by: Jerome | May 18, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Amen Brother David(AustinTX)
And May Bush come back to TX and protect us from Obama should he win. Then we can strike out in a new anti-world direction and talk to no one, live in our own cave in Bora Bora. May Karl Rove be the high priest and Candi the High Priestess, and Rev Hagee the inforcer.
Posted by: THinking | May 18, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
So if McCain wins he may help appoint conservative judges, and if Obama wins he may help appoint judges that are well versed black liberation theology. I’ll take my chance with McCain.
Posted by: Mack | May 18, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
President Bush came into office during a mild recession. Shortly after 9/11 happened followed by Katrina. Most economists agree that President Bush’s tax cuts actually helped the economy recover during these difficult times. However, any dynamic economy will continue to go though many ups and downs unless the dead hand of government takes over and the economy spirals down until it hits bottom and never recovers. This is because, the more money that goes into government the less money there is in the private sector for people to freely spend their money on. Money that can be used to create jobs, new technology, products and services. In contrast, money in government is used primarily to pay for a top heavy bureaucracy of unelected elitists who sit around all day telling everyone how to run their lives. Not to mention the money that goes into the pockets of a bunch of corrupt boot lickers that hang around the politicians. That’s what Obama is calling for when he talks about “change” and “hope”. In a nutshell, Obama is advocating higher taxes, big government and lots more government workers telling everyone how to run their lives. Don’t buy into it.
Posted by: Maple | May 18, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Mccain doesn’ give a rats arse about you Re-pubic-ans voters and troops dying in these dumb arse WARS.
His old fart senile self never cared about the America peope..You dumb Republicans sheep and cattle are jst dumb as Bush is.. No wonder my Country is going down the Toilet.. Republicans just need to crawl back into there caves and don’t come out until you get a real education.
Obviously Republicans don’t have enough intelligence to fill a thumball and never been the smartest humans on EARTH..
REPUBICANS ARE TO STUPID TO VOTE RIGHT,,,,, THEY ALWAYS PICK IDIOTS TO RUN THE COUNTRY..
Lincoln and Regan were Republicans with Democraic Souls!!!!
Posted by: SPEAKS THE TRUTH | May 18, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am
MCCAIN ’08, BECAUSE AMERICA REALLY IS THAT STUPID!
Posted by: Wise One | May 18, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Bush has the worst foreign relations record in recent history He is an utter and complete failure. He has no expertise or success he could point to when it comes to dealing with friends or enemies alike. His ideas are proven losers, yet he wants to criticize people who don’t agree with him. He needs to sit down, shut up, and let brighter minds and tougher men deal with these issues.
Posted by: Hey Scoob | May 18, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
McCain is going to be at the National Convention high off of geritol and Viagra..
When he falls of the stage with his walker, i am going to fall the F out!!
McCain has way to many Senior moments to become POTUS..
He’s been a puppet way to many years in the house.
McCain never once voted on a bill that the guy next to him didn’t vote for..
McCain says, who or what are they voting on? Ok count me to whatever it is???
He has no idea what he stands for unless it’s men dying in a WAR!!
Posted by: THE TRUTH RUTH | May 18, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Rob.A it is you that is the biggest idiot. Who do you think you are? You dont attack anyone on this blog. I guess you are a red-neck. Always thinking they are better than the rest of every American. I dont care who you were referring to but dont call anyone an idiot. Guess you dont even know what an idiot is?
Posted by: jayjay | May 18, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
The Democrats must be stopped everythings going so well, its the activist judges and the liberal media that make you think otherwise. We got to do it the cowboy “don’t mess with Texas” way you can’t talk to nobody, the USA can do anything they want. The liberals want you to save the enviroment and get along with the rest of the world, but I have news for you not everyone in this world is a good white christian. The democrats want to steal our guns, our stem cells, and make us marry gay people, I watch Fox News everyday so don’t tell me I don’t know what I’m talking about!
Posted by: Jake | May 18, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
The Democrats must be stopped everythings going so well, its the activist judges and the liberal media that make you think otherwise. We got to do it the cowboy “don’t mess with Texas” way you can’t talk to nobody, the USA can do anything they want. The liberals want you to save the enviroment and get along with the rest of the world, but I have news for you not everyone in this world is a good white christian. The democrats want to steal our guns, our stem cells, and make us marry gay people, I watch Fox News everyday so don’t tell me I don’t know what I’m talking about!
Posted by: Jake | May 18, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Obama is going to get himself in trouble as he pushes this. First, he is totally inexperienced and has an extremely loose grasp on historical facts.
Second, he is playing to his Democratic base. I thought he decided he was already running in the General… So how is he going to get those Reagan Democrats and Independents with this kind of talk???
Third… It’s the economy, Stupid. Why is Obama focusing on foreign policy… where McCain in one poll was up by 40 points. This is Obama’s weakest issue… and McCain’s strongest…. and I repeat… Obama is going to get himself in trouble… a good metaphor would be that this is akin to his bowling game.
Posted by: nickberry | May 18, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
If Obama will call out the President and McCain like this, imagine what he would do to the leader of a rogue nation. Perhaps a Southsider-style beatdown.
Posted by: hey Scoob | May 18, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
why be mean to the Republicans?
The Democrats need to sort out their own problems first!
No. 1: We have one too many candidates aboard.
No.2: Be nice about it, BUT GET RID OF B Ozo!!! We already Have a BOZO in the White House!
GIVE EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | May 18, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Nickberry,
What is the matter? He is engaging the enemy. Does it frieghten you that he may know what he is talking about?
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
All the McCain/Bush backers need to relax. Can any on of you justify the Bush foreign policy of the past seven years? The reason for attacking Iraq has changed so many times he can’t keep his story straight. Earlier this week he asked the Saudis, whose behind he has been kissing since day one, to increased oil production and they laughed at him. The same Saudi Arabia who provided the majority of the funding to the 9/11 terrorists. Read a little bit, knowledge is a wonderful thing. President Bush decided to give up golf to honor the brave soldiers fighting in Iraq. In seven months when he leaves office he stop with this massive sacrifice and pursue his golf game and in his spare time he can look for those missing WMDs, the “real” killer of OJ’s wife and Osama Bin Laden. You guys want his clone to lead this country? If McCain wins, wrap yourself in the flag and prepare for a bumpy ride.
Posted by: lou | May 18, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
Hannity’s Soul-Mate of Hate
Well, there’s plenty of evidence to the contrary (Max Blumenthal’s piece in Nation is good for a start), but it hardly matters, because don’t you know, days later, Turner himself was doing his pal a total solid by coming out and stating, “Oh, yeah! We’re best of buds!”
I mean, Hannity gave Turner his Super Secret Little Anti-Semite Annie Decoder Ring so he could call him up whenever he wanted to! If the two men had been younger – and mentally eligible for a high school education – they surely would have gone to prom together!
Anyway, Turner and Hannity have a nice, long, intimate, chummy history, and Turner offers the essential blow-by-blow. “I can tell you from my firsthand, personal experience that Sean Hannity does, in fact, agree with many of my political and social views. I can also tell you that Sean Hannity disagrees with some of my political and social views. I won’t go subject-by-subject to say which he agrees with and which he disagrees with. You can figure that out easy enough on your own!” Can we? What if we’re not enthusiastic fans of the thought processes of nimrods, though?
Naturally, Turner has got a blustery warning for us all: “Another big difference is that I am perfectly willing to use force and violence against my enemies while Sean Hannity and others are not. Those using me as a prop to attack Sean Hannity would do well to remember this fact. Rest assured I will remember them when the opportunity presents itself; especially as it pertains to that sodomite Max Blumenthal for the falsehoods and total trash he wrote about me in ‘The Nation’ magazine.”
http://www.newshounds.us/2008/03/23/neo_naziwhite_supremacist_hal_turner_confirms_friendship_and_kinship_with_sean_hannity.php
Posted by: TRUE IS TRUTH | May 18, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Yep, Bush created a bad image for America. What kind of image do we have with a President Barack Hussein Muhammed Obama as POTUS? a laughingstock to the Muslims. They will be cheerfully joining you obamanuts to celebrate. This country is going to be doomed. We’ll see what kind of change we have “Barack will never let you go back to your normal lives” from Michelle. The change we’ll see from the man associated with Black Theology and whose father is a Muslim. Don’t tell me he was never a Muslim. His father and step father were muslim. His mom didn’t mind name him all Arabic so why would she objected to him being a Muslim. He lived in a Muslim country for over 5 years of his childhood. He has been and is now a Christian but don’t ever tell me he was never a muslim. You are a fool if you believe that. This is just to point out an obvious lie that people just shrug off for him.
Go McCain or Hillary! No way in h*ll I would vote for Barack Hussien Muhammad Obama
Posted by: wilson | May 18, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Get Real Hillary has already lost. Even McCain and Bush has figured that out.
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
Lol you know Rev Wright was in the white house when clinton was president right? so was monica and paula and linda
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
ambro:
Al Qaida didn’t have the bomb or a large army. Nonetheless, they did significant damage to us.
_______________________
Thinking:
Make up your mind! First you denounce Bush and McCain as stupid and THEN you say we should believe them about BO’s
lively contender…
Maybe YOU should start thinking!
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!
Posted by: QUESTIONER | May 18, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
The American Government gave Bin Laden and Saddam weapons and they turn on us..
That’s what is wrong with our Government..
We let Bill into the White House to sleep with more interns and we let him slide when He lied to us..
BILL:”I did not have no relations with that woman”
BILL: “Ok I did and with out a condom”" My Baad”
BILL: “Hillary was home, she watched, she’s a freeak”
BILL: “Chuckle”
Hillary: “I have 32 years of experience”.
Hillary: ” I lied, I lied to Walmart employees who lost their jobs and benefits when we got rid
of the unions”
Hillary: I lied on my taxes, WHITEWATER scandal and got away with it, hehehe!
Hillary: I let my friend fly for free on tax payers hard earned dollar TRAVELGATE, OOPS!! Hehehe!!
Hillary: I like lying to the FBIGATE, they are silly like middle class American saps! Hehehehe!!
Hillary: “I got my best friend and tax lawyer killed and I got my tax paperwork out of his office the night I got, I mean, he got killed”
Hillary: “8 years as first lady I meet with political leaders and sat in on US and Foreign Policies.
Hillary: “I lied, I never had security clearance to sit in on any political businees.” OOPS!!
Hillary: ” I drank tea and ate lots of food while my husband slept with Monica”.
So now Hillary just took lying to an all new level!!
“Snipers, snipers everywhere, RUN!!!
Run!!! Forrest Run”
“Run Chelsea Run”
“Run Sinbad and Cheryl, Run!!”
Hillary: ” I mispoke that I ran, I am human, everybody does it.”
Posted by: TRUE IT IS | May 18, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Many Obama supporters view Iraq as a failure despite the facts on the ground that the “surge” is a success and Al Qaeda is on the run. If Obama has his way, Obama will most certainly drag defeat out of the jaws of victory. I do not believe the American people want this as a defeat in Iraq would result in such grave consequences to the US and the people of Iraq.
The simple truth is, had Saddam adhered to UN resolution 1441 the US would not have invaded Iraq. Documents secured from Saddam now show that Saddam had every intention of restarting his WMD program as he did not think the US would invade him. So sooner or later, the world would have had to face up to the immediate threat Saddam posed to the world. Post 9/11, the US decided it would not wait and be attacked by a known enemy of the West . An enemy who cheered 9/11 , provided aid to Hamas , and who every intelligence agency reported had WMDs. Thus Iraq was invaded. In my opinion, whether it would have been better let Saddam stay in power is a moot point at this time. The facts on the ground now in Iraq are that Al Qaeda is there and if the USA retreats and turns Iraq over to them, Al Qaeda will have access to Iraq’s large oil reserves and thus the means and opportunity to attack us and attack us hard. Our Middle Eastern allies may abandon us and hook up with Al Queda, not to mention the boost a withdrawal from Iraq will give to Iran, Syria and Hamas. Think WWIII, A lot of people on these posts seem think the worse of the USA, again as embodied in the anti-American sermons of Rev. Wright. Further, they scoff at the threat Al Qaeda and the rest of their ilk poses to the security of the US and future of the Western World. I say stop thinking the worse of America and save a little of your vitriol for our true enemies who have vowed to kill all of us. If Obama is elected his defeatist policies will put us all at more risk of another 9/11 attack and even worse the blow up the middle east which will mean more will die, just like what happened in WWII when people thought Hitler could be appeased and were wrong, very wrong.
Posted by: Sandy | May 18, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
On the other hand McCain was funny on SNL, maybe he could get a permanent position on the show
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
WHAT WHITE SHEEP SEEM TO FORGET!!
The Bush’s Sr and Jr and McWar too!!!
Along with Our moronic Government gave the Taliban and Al Qaeda training to use the weapons we gave them to fight against Russia in Afghanistan!!
Remember you fools!!
We also trained and gave Weapons to Saddam!!
Remember you Fools!!
Now those are the Chickens that came home to Roost that Rev idiot Wright was talking about.
To bad White sheep hate when they are told, “YOU FUDGED UP!!”
We went over there to get Saddam out of power for what ever reason they think they saw fit.
He was a bad man for sure. He needed to be killed. But kill him only, not everyone else but him.
White Sheep need to change the course and get a President in office that will get our Sons and Daughters out of this no win Iraq problem.
We went in not knowing how the hell we are going to get out..
THAT’S WHAT I CALL A REAL SMART MOVE, BY THE SAME PERSON’SFAMILY THAT GAVE THEM POWER..
THE BUSH’S!!
Our American Government gave the Muslims and Islamic terrorist all the weapons they needed to start a Holy War..
We thought they were our friends, lol!!
WAKE UP WHITE SHEEP, PLEASE WAKE UP…
You kept your mouths closed for this long..
YOU POOR SHEEP!!
Posted by: YES WE CAN | May 18, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
@ Sandy
I would like to point out, like Obama did. that Al Qaeda was not Iraq until after we attacked and failed to have enough manpower on the ground to hold the peace.
So over 40000 men and women lost their lives and over 30,000 wpwere wounded to remove WMD for a country that diddn.t have any and to chase out Al Qaeda that wasn’t there untill we opened the door for them to arrive.
Boy we accomplishe a whole lot there.
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
C’mon white people, let the nigs have the dem party. Typically we are better paid and have better education. We live in better neighborhoods and drive nicer vehicles. We have more to lose than the nigs. It’s time for us to stick together.
Posted by: jo | May 18, 2008 1:47:04 AM
lol it must be like a book of stupidity and ignorance that has more pictures than words that people like you inherit. Its like Racism for dummies. Pictures of black people next to a crack house, a hispanic next to a lawn mower. Im gonna need for you to do better
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
Bush-McCain foreign policy
BushMcCain foreign policy
McBush foreign policy
105 more years of war
Posted by: Jim B | May 18, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am
Essentially his plan is we’re gonna dismantle the employer-based system and give everybody a tax break and then see if you can fend for yourself in the marketplace This is exactly what Obama is propossing except for children
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am
jo are you a typical Obama supporter pretending to be a racist so anyone who disagrees with Obama looks bad? If you are, you are the real racist. Yes you are.
Posted by: question to jo | May 18, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Obama is not at all like Kennedy, maybe like Reagan always saying things that “are not what he meant” He looks insignificant against the flag background. Write Hillary on the ballot.
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Isn’t Mccain like 1000 years old and wears a depends diaper…
He looks like a uncovered mummy….
McMummy unplugged, lol!
McCain is so old, he still owes Moses $3.00
McShame rides in style on his wife’s private jet…
Only because she thinks he will get lost flying Coach with all his pee pee breaks..
And she worries about his comb over… lol!!
McCain is toast… He wanted to run a clean campaign, sorry Mcwar, you are not able to run you nose, let alone a campaign.
We fixed the Problem in MS, LA, and AL. The Democrats have taken the South, now on to the White House.
Posted by: FACTS | May 18, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
Most Obama supporters are racist. Write Hillary on the ballot, she will crush obama
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
Thinking, I never said Al Qaeda was in Iraq. See Below:
The simple truth is, had Saddam adhered to UN resolution 1441 the US would not have invaded Iraq. Documents secured from Saddam now show that Saddam had every intention of restarting his WMD program as he did not think the US would invade him. So sooner or later, the world would have had to face up to the immediate threat Saddam posed to the world. Post 9/11, the US decided it would not wait and be attacked by a known enemy of the West . An enemy who cheered 9/11 , provided aid to Hamas , and who every intelligence agency reported had WMDs. Thus Iraq was invaded.
Posted by: Sandy | May 18, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
Write Hillary on the ballot.
***********************************
LOL. With electronic voting machines? When was the last time yuou voted?
Posted by: Tinking | May 18, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
What does Obama knows about diplomacy? Because he talked to kids in Indonesia when he was six years old? or did he learned from Rezko and Hamas pals.
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
Most Obama supporters are racist. Write Hillary on the ballot, she will crush obama
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008 1:56:14 AM
lol where are u getting that info from? have you met the 16 million obama fans? guess richardson, pelosi, dean, the three former clinton supporters are all racists. youve allowed the stupid media to cloud your judgement.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
Posted by: jo | May 18, 2008 1:53:08 AM
Looks like you talk about Rich people with nice cars and houses,
Then why do you live in a Double Wide Trailer??
Explain???
Posted by: jojojojojo | May 18, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
Thinking even on electronic machines you can write an independent. Wrte Hillary on the ballot. Obama is unelectable
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
Allamr18: I AM FROM a city where all of the nigs live in one part of town. We call it nig town here. It has been that way forever. It will never change. Nigs have a place they belong. We don’t want them in our part of town. Their part of town is by the state fair park and during the state fair they rent out their yards for parking. I paid a nig to park in his yard once and when I left my car was full of fleas.
Lol right. what city is this? and do these nigs not have any names? your car was filled with fleas? thats a poor attempt at a joke so i will let it slide. but come on man you can do better than that.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
anastassia27:
No, “Sweetie”.
Let’s not go there!
Many of us are perturbed at the sexist attitude of too many (not all) men in these various blogs who are picking this Newbie about whom most of our information has come from his two semi-autobiographical novels…. which albeit literate are not necessarily factually dependable .
Others are turned off by his sexist statements like the one describing the woman who raised him as “a typical white woman”…. and addressing professional women as “Sweetie”.
Also, some of us are repulsed by the chutzpa and misinformation emanating from this charismatic egocentric character, and his associations with people who we wouldn’t want littering up the Oval Office while discussing foreign policy.
Finally, some of us just find him to be
TOO G R E E N!!!
Which is why I say:
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: QUESTIONER | May 18, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
@jo
Typical Texan from Dallas I see.
Dumb and getting dumber great schooll system there aint it.
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Allamr08 You are proof of that
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
JimB. Get some facts. McCain did not say he was for 100 years of war. McCain said that much like Japan and South Korea the US may still need to maintain some type of US troop presence in Iraq after the fighting war ends provided the troops are not in any danger. So stop spewing the lies that come out of the mouths of typical Obama supporters.
Posted by: Harry | May 18, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Obama’s healthcare plan just calls for children coverage enforcement. for adults his propossal is the same as McCain. Obama opposses Universal Healthcare. Write Hillary on the ballot.
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Allamr08 You are proof of that
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008 2:01:57 AM
proof of what?
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
LIBRE:
are you sure?
I’m a displaced New Yorker here in
Illinois… and I definitely wouldn’t want my vote to be in danger of going to him!
Posted by: QUESTIONER | May 18, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
Of Obama supporters being racist. You support him only for his race. Nothing else.
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
questionar yes, There are only six states that do not allow write ins
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am
Jo you live in a run down Trailer park with no cable…
How do you have internet??
Oh I get it, your at your gas pumping job and they have web access.
Got it…
Someone needs you on pump 2#
Bye!
Posted by: jojojojo | May 18, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am
@Sandy
What is this then from your post?
“Many Obama supporters view Iraq as a failure despite the facts on the ground that the “surge” is a success and Al Qaeda is on the run.”
Sounds like you said that Al Queda is there to me
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Of Obama supporters being racist. You support him only for his race. Nothing else.
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008 2:07:15 AM
Lol you dont know why i support him and have never asked me. Ive said before if hillary were in the driver seat shed have my vote no hands down. not because shes white or woman but because the republicans have screwed things up massively. Im in no way racists i have no problem with anyones race. do i like the fact that he is a viable black candidate yes. buts its no where near the sole reason. dont be so quick to assume. hillary and barack are almost identical on policy but i just didnt like the way she attacked him, i was actually a supporter of her up until that.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Dear Mr. Obama,
George Bush and John McCain don’t have a problem with John F. Kennedy, or Ronald Reagan, or Richard Nixon because those guys had the expertise to do the great things that you so kindly pointed out.
YOU said McCain and President Bush don’t understand foreign policy. Can you provide me with a history of your foreign policy experience? What knowledge, what experience, what background do you have? And, please don’t point to your Jakarta/Muslim connection… it doesn’t bode well.
Your only claim to fame is condemning all who voted for the war… claiming you were against it from the beginning… all based on a 2002 speech you gave in Chicago… but you conveniently leave out the fact that you weren’t even in the Senate then… hoping we’ll assume you were. In fact you had not been elected yet and were in Illinois when the vote went down.
You want us to think that you alone had the courage to take this position… through some mystical insight… but the truth is… you had nothing to risk! In a 2004 interview with the New York Times you admitted that you had not been privy to the Senate intelligence reports and said, “What would I have done? I don’t know. What I know is that from my vantage point the case was not made.” Those intelligence reports were the basis of the Senate’s decision. If you were not privy to those intelligence reports then the case was never presented to you… so how can you honestly say the case was not made? You couldn’t!
You’re not being honest or truthful, nor do you have any courage given your voting record on “Important” legislation in Illinois and Washington D.C. I could go on but it’s late and I’m tired.
Please respond. Facts only… No Smooth Talk!
Posted by: Larry | May 18, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Hillary’s time is up. Let’s stop playing games and unite as Democrats. Don’t be fooled by the Republican moles on here …
Posted by: No more games | May 18, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
@jo
Your trash.
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
“To vote for a person whose
name does not appear on the ballot, write the person’s name on the line provided and complete the arrow” This is from a sample ballot. You have the option to vote for the party all the way or choose for candidates to the different positions already listed or write your preference on the designated lines
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
THIS WAS NEITHER ABOUT OBAMA NOR APPEASEMENT
Why is the media focusing on the wrong story here?
Obviously Obama picked up on the potential for headlines, but is that not a secondary story?
This about the misuse of the term “NEGOTIATE”
http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/05/bushs-misrepresentation-of-negotiate.html
Posted by: PacificGatePost | May 18, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
nomoregames Real Democrats won’t vote for Obama.
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
So JO, you are in GATE COMMUNITY with a Prison Security Guard…
I see, how’s BUBBA treating you lately, can’t sleep? the pain the pain…
Posted by: jojojojo | May 18, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
You idiots that live in your little “Hurray for our side” mind are the very reason that the US is crumbling. I think the republican argument is tragically effective on dullards and cowards. The democratic argument is a bit Hippy-ish, but at least is about some change. I hope Obama wins and stays true to his ideals, there’s a good chance he won’t, but he is the only chance. C’mon, consider something more than the gang mind set of birds and ants. Remember, fools make good food.
Posted by: Dan | May 18, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
Happy republican here. I’ll pay $20 a gallon and the war can last 100000 years as far as I care. Better than Obama being president.
Posted by: jo | May 18, 2008 2:15:46 AM
20 a gallon and 100,000 years of war? real tough talk. well your educated and make more money than nigs so i guess you can do it. i wonder if you will put your sons in this 100,000 year war with 20 dollar gas. be a little realistic with your exaggerations
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
All the people that live in REAL RICH gated community are in the TANK for OBAMA..
The Rich and Educated are supporting Obama..
I guest since you are racist trash, you could never live among the Rich..
They would make you leave..
So keep wishing and your Trailer Park might get cable one day…..
Posted by: SORRY JO | May 18, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
What we have is a paperless voting machine there is no way to do a write in. One turns a knob, and the machine scrolls down, and select enter for or against. That is it.
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am
allamr08 Now Obama’s supporters say they would support Sen Clinton if she was the nominee. But for months most of barack’s supporters have insulted her and her family and her supporters, and have denigrated and underestimated all Democrat achievements, including the Presidency of Bill Clinton, the best president in the last 40 or more years. 80% of Obama’s supports are from AA that are supporting him just for race and not the issues. That is not enough to win the GE. He is unelectable.
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
thinking you are wrong
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
Wrong about what?
Posted by: Thinking | May 18, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
allamr08 Now Obama’s supporters say they would support Sen Clinton if she was the nominee. But for months most of barack’s supporters have insulted her and her family and her supporters, and have denigrated and underestimated all Democrat achievements, including the Presidency of Bill Clinton, the best president in the last 40 or more years. 80% of Obama’s supports are from AA that are supporting him just for race and not the issues. That is not enough to win the GE. He is unelectable.
i cant speak for all of his supporters but all the exit polls said that more of obama supporters would support hillary than hillary supporters supporting obama so im a little confused by your post. But again i say you have been duped my friend. Obama supporters have not been the problem its the media with this stupid demographics game. blacks whites educated old women working class all of this talk divided us and we let it. we allowed for them to dictate and put us in categories.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
You can write an independent on the ballot. You are not obligated to vote only Democrat or Republican.
Posted by: libre | May 18, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
“In 3 years JFK gave the world the Bay of Pigs, the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Viet Nam war. His personal life was equally a mess cheating on his wife and addicted to pain killers.”
Yet none of you have demeaned Jackie just as none of you have ever demeaned Eleanor Roosevelt!
None of you even demeaned JFK!
Bill Clinton gave you so much and, despite his impunities, more than fulfilled our dreams of hope and prosperity…. and after eight years of dedication left our treasury overflowing with billions of dollars.
Hillary and Bill brought life to the Democratic Party and were nothing but generous to the people of this country and the world….
In payment for the all of the GOOD things the Clintons have done Obama’s followers for the most part have slandered and spewed slime at them and showed a venomous evil spirit I’ve never ever seen before in a political campaign.
Obama, of course, claims to have clean hands in this regard because truly, he didn’t have to lift a finger.
(Just like he was blameless in Michigan when he had his phone guys spread the word that every should vote “uncommitted” because he knew he couldn’t have won.)
Bill’s Campaign was Hope Fulfilled, and he has said that Hillary is capable of being a thousand times better than he was.
Why would you vote for Mr Green, whose “Change” so far seems to be shifting back to the fifties… when you could vote for a woman who comes to us not with chants and promises, but with viable SOLUTIONS?
GIVE ‘EM HELL HILLARY!!!!
Posted by: QUESTIONER | May 18, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am
CORRECTION, PLEASE–NOT DR. OBAMA!
Sen. McCain’s so called jokes aside, he has been most disappointing on many fronts and has shown a new propensity to distort and confuse. One good example is the Isreali-Palestinian issue and the way he tried to distort both his past positions on Hamas and Obama’s views. This is one area that statesmanlike politicians should never play politics with. Israel is a friend of the US and the US is a friend of Israel. Period. And America and Obama agree and respect that. That is as it should be! But Obama is also looking for a way to quicken the achievement of a permanent peace in Israel and Palestine, indeed the whole Middle East. In this regard, note Friedman’s excellent and clarifying OP-Ed piece in the New York Times of May 18, 2008. Obama’s approach is based on a broader vision than what the Republican Party under Bush has so far achieved. Sadly, McCain, it seems, is going to follow Bush all the way no matter what–with no possibility of bringing peace to the Middle East in the foreseeable future. Who doesn’t already know that President Bush has saddled the country with the dare consequences of the greatest failure in foreign policy in this and the last centuries? Will any sane person then look up to the Bush-McCain alliance for expertise and wisdom on the Israeli-Palestinian question?
Posted by: Dr. Sam | May 18, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am
BO is the only one who has problem with JFK. He did not campaign as he should in West Virginia like JFK. JFK did not quit on people and sell people short. BO hold 2M voters of MI and FL hostage for the momentum of his campaign. The party pundits and BO collaborate to exploit the civil right of people.
Ted the playboy candidate was sucked in supporting BO because of the legend of his father sponsored by Kennedy fund; which is a lie.
BO do not fight his battle and have the party sending out attack dogs to tamper people voting for Hillary.
JFK is for civil right and BO makes the country divisive with 92% of black votes to begin with. He uses Bush play book in smearing Hillary, McCain whoever in his way.
BO is a phony. His poetic promises of change is supported by hot air.—–
Todd Spivak of the Houston Press has documented how Obama accomplished next to nothing in his first six years in the Illinois legislature.——
Then Emil Jones Jr. an African American with thirty years in the legislature made Obama a sponsor of 26 bills that became law. This is how BO portrays himself as a highly successful legislator.——
This is just like giving him the ball at 1 yard line.—–
Has Obama repaid Jones? Yes. He has provided tens of millions in earmarks for Jones’ district. As to such actions, Jones famously said: “Some call it pork; I call it steak.”——
Michelle Obama’s salary at University of Chicago Hospitals when her husband won the US Senate seat was $121,000. Within weeks of his swearing in, her salary went to over $320,000. The following year Obama did an earmark request for $1 million for her employer.——
BO is just a talker that has used bombastic high-flown language to fool millions of people by poetic promises of change. In reality, he has taken considerable money and support from all sorts of corporate and other special interests. Remember his Bittergate!
Posted by: John_Lai | May 18, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
When it comes down to McCain vs Obama, real Democrats are NOT going to vote for McCain. I don’t buy it — it’s just a myth created by Republicans to divide.
Posted by: McLame McSame | May 18, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
Bill Clinton gave you so much and, despite his impunities, more than fulfilled our dreams of hope and prosperity…. and after eight years of dedication left our treasury overflowing with billions of dollars.
Hillary and Bill brought life to the Democratic Party and were nothing but generous to the people of this country and the world….
I think your inflating the clintons a bit much. Bill wasnt all that great. he didnt really do much and had more scandal then anything. I like them and all but his presidency was not great. And you can see how great the clintons are by their supporters. Most of them have defected to Obama because of whatever reasons. But hillary is now owed anything she was not the president she was the wife.
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
He’s demanding answers from the president and McCain ( a former POW, war hero) and he thinks we have 57 states! At least Hillary’s respectful to the flag. I give her that and the deserving call to be the nominee. Either way, McCain will win!
Posted by: Christie | May 18, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
He’s demanding answers from the president and McCain ( a former POW, war hero) and he thinks we have 57 states! At least Hillary’s respectful to the flag. I give her that and the deserving call to be the nominee. Either way, McCain will win!
Posted by: Christie | May 18, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am
Sorry for the double post.
Posted by: Christie | May 18, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am
John_Lai | May 18, 2008 2:30:06 AM
Thank you for doing your homework.
Posted by: QUESTIONER | May 18, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am
How do you know if Obama or Clinton or McCain has a good plan for the nation if you don’t read and understand their plans posted all over their sites? People seem to love to talk, most of the comments here have little to no value at all.
Posted by: Tom | May 18, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am
Obama ain’t no Jack Kennedy.
Kennedy was a leader. Obama is a follower.
Obama follows the rules!
In 1776 the rule said only white male landowners can vote.
From 1776-1864 the rule said slavery was legal.
From 1776-1869 the rule said a person race or servitude could be used to prevent a citizen from voting.
Before the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the rules said Negros sit in the back of the bus…
DNC rules Florida & Michigan voters do not count.
Obama was a sheep in Rev. Wright’s flock.
Obama opposed a revote in Florida & Michigan because he is a chicken that he would lose.
The President of the U.S. is a leader NOT a follower! A leader to represent all the people and to change bad rules!
Posted by: Jason | May 18, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am
The Democratic Party is committed to winning elections at every level in every region of the country, and we’re getting started right now with a massive effort to fund organizers on the ground in every state.
The ultimate goal? An active, effective group of Democrats organized in every single precinct in the country. Here’s what we’re doing to get there:
THIS IS JUST A LITTLE PIECE OF THE 50 STATE STRATEGY TAKEN FROM THE DNC WEBSITE. HOW DO THEY PLAN TO HAVE A 50 STATE STRATEGY WHEN OBAMA WILL NOT CAMPAIGN IN KENTUCKY? HOW DO THEY PLAN TO HAVE A 50 STATE STRATEGY WHEN THEY DISINFRANCHISE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN?
Posted by: kevin | May 18, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
So far Hillary clinton is the only one actually going to all of the states. Even in states where she knew she would not win either Bill, Chelesea or her went there to try. Obama has already quit if you ask me.
Posted by: kevin | May 18, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am
I am disgusted by the DNCs so claimed 50 state strategy. How can you claim to care about every single state when you obviously don’t care about Florida and Michigan. I am appalled at the least. I will not vote for a democrat if this is the way democrats justify a win for Obama.
Posted by: max | May 18, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am
I think Kennedy is having his medical problems out of guilt. He knows he needs to chnage his endorsement to Clinton.
Posted by: old ironsides | May 18, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am
Iran DID attack us. The same regime is in power that took hundreds of American embassy workers hostage, at the American embassy in Iran. I believe the current president of the country, the one who wants to annihilate Isarael and denies the Holocaust took place, was one of the terrorists who took the hostages in the first place. I absolutely agree that there was no real need to invade Iraq.
Posted by: LynnS | May 18, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am
Allamr18, May 18, 2008 2:32:47 AM
Not at all.
Allamr18 Look up his presidency for yourself; it’s all available, all the time!
As for HIllary, no one ever said she’s “owed anything”.
SHE IS ABLE TO G I V E US THE
LEADERSHIP WE NEED!
Let’s not be stupid and throw this opportunity away!
SHE doesn’t need US!
WE need HER!!!
Give ‘em just a little bit of Hell
HILLARY !!!
Posted by: earful | May 18, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am
Some of you people make me sick!!! All the racist jokes. I am embarrassed to be an American sometimes. Especially with ignorant rednecks (Bush/McCain) that seemingly make up half the population. We need a concentration camp for the dumb.
Posted by: Attrition | May 18, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am
Obama should read up on history what Kennedy did with CUBA. Kennedy was going to wipe CUBA off the face of the map. It was only after CUBA backed down from pointing missles at United States did Kennedy back down from destroying CUBA.
Posted by: sand bag | May 18, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am
Obama, you are wrong – but it sounds good – the fact is you are not qualified to lead the free world and protect the American way of life. The world has changed since the 60′s – are haven’t you noticed.
McCain will be the next President because he has earned the right, and you have not.
So talk Talk – have you heard what your wife has been saying? She is not to far from Rev Wright.
Posted by: a citizen | May 18, 2008, 3:43 am 3:43 am
WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT IS ALL THE SAME, WHO GETS INTO THE OFFICE.
Posted by: lee | May 18, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am
Virginia
Don’t mislead people. You added you credential to give your lies some credibily. Define what you mean by “proper channel” before you post misterium. I am a historian and I am from Poland, former Sovient Block. For your education, Soviet was more a danger to US than Iran is today. Go back to your Professor. IN DIPLOMACY, NO AGENDA IS CERTAIN UNTILL YOU START TALK.
Posted by: Allen | May 18, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am
Typical Obama smokescreen. No context to what actually happened and the situations associated with the diplomatic discussions made by Kennedy and Regan. One thing both Kennedy and Regan did was negotiate via peace through superior military strength. Terrorists are not people open to civil discussions. They are thugs – get it!
Posted by: CtTexan01 | May 18, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am
The republicans are more scared of Iran than the soviet Unions who got enough nuclear weapons to obliterate the U.S
So we should not deal with Iran, but in the past we have dealt with the soviet union
Iran
Iran is more dangerous now because they are terroritss?
Iran doesn’t even have nuclear weapons to attack us… Doesn’t even have an army to compare with USSR
But dealing with the soviets is safer than dealing with Iran for the republicans ?
Republicans are such a bunch of wimps… They are so scared …
Posted by: ambro23 | May 18, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am
“I’ve talked to people in Canada about their health care and was told by several people in Victoria that if they want good health care they come to the U.S. I’m a non-partisan voter by the way.”
Tell you what “Ron Powell” a hell of a lot more of us are going the OTHER way, whether to buy prescriptions or get treatment our insurance companies won’t finance us for here. Health care should NOT be a profit-making industry it should be a civic right and a social service. We’re No 38 in the world health care leagues. Canada is WAY above us.
Posted by: Hippocrates | May 18, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am
playing with cocaine is dangerous for your health? did he do a tad bit too much of the stuf? obama might have had some intellect some time ago but evidence of that is lacking now…….. every question is met with er…ahhh…well i believe i said that in my speech.
in other words if its not prepared and rehersed the night before dont expect him to make much sense….. hope other young people see and hear him and learn their lessons. then you have him with all this quesitonable baggage of rezko, ayers, pastor, etc., in tow…..
not working people.just not working.
Posted by: connect dots | May 18, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am
a bush third-term is impossible.
presidents are only allowed two terms.
McCain is his own person with his own approach. A FIRST TERM MCCAIN TRUMPS A FIRST TERM OBAMA-MICHELLE.
Posted by: i'm just sayin | May 18, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am
LynnS said: “Does Obama realize that the Russians or Chinese did not attack us?”
Ans: Lynn, do you realize that neither Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan attacked U.S. either? All those ALLEGED highjackers ALLEGEDLY came from countries allied with U.S.? I will continue to use the word ALLEGE for a reason. Know what I’m sayin’? It’s really sad what gullible followers Americans can be, but you continue to scratch your head at how Hitler misled so many?!
Posted by: Bmo | May 18, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am
Not racist, read the book, don’t like him. Sorry! Thanks for jumping to conclusions like most of you bots out there.
Posted by: tech398 | May 18, 2008, 5:14 am 5:14 am
How does someone like get 50 million a day for his campaign, that no other dem has gotten? Why no questions about the sources of this? And why does every leftist (I don’t call them Liberals, Thomas Jefferson was a liberals, they’re more bolsheviks) assume that only conservatives don’t trust this man?He consistently talks out of both sides oh his mouth. And has never answered difficult questions. How quickl the leftist media abandoned the Clintons, for this tall skinny toothy smiler.
Posted by: Lobo | May 18, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am
Obama’s willingness to engage the “enemy” is a fresh approach. Chiding and refusing to discuss the issues that are fueling a serious conflict is just grand standing. It takes a true statesman to get his team to prepare both sides for meetings. Ignoring the “enemy” is as short sighted as those who want to destroy Israel. Such horrible stand-offs only benefit the military-industrial-religious nazi-esque war mongers. They would rather let the best men and women, and innocent bystanders suffer as a conflict rages on. Shame on Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld. They belong in front of the world court for crimes against humanity.
Posted by: Mike Guilford | May 18, 2008, 5:25 am 5:25 am
I only have one thing to say. If obama was to be pure white, he would have been the nominee since. America now has the chance of experiencing a new kind of leadership, if not, then America will be heading to a more disastrous path considering its diminishing moral high ground. As things are really now, a new king of leadership must be tried to save United states image. This is not the time to add Race to this once in a lifetime opportunity.
Posted by: richy | May 18, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am
Yes I did. Why rewrite it? It’s all over the internet anyway. Let’s have a discussion. Yes, I agree with some type of interfacing with our enemies … but no I don’t prefer a Neville Chamberlain in 2008. Yes it’s time for a black man or woman as president, but it’s not time to have someone who’s been glorified by the media. Maybe I’ve been around too long, but people will listen to anything when their going hungry. Say what you will, spout your comments like I see many of you doing, and keep dividing us from the big picture of no matter who is in office, nothing will change until special interests, interlocking board directorships, corporate control and those factors eliminate the plague that has taken over our congress and president.
Posted by: tech398 | May 18, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am
By the way, do you think he’ll be able to fix the damage that has been done to date? He’ll be bound by special interests as well. Continue to see more civil liberty erosion, tax increases, and my all time favorite … “let’s keep turning our local police into mechanized infantry while kids can’t afford pencils in school”
Posted by: tech398 | May 18, 2008, 6:06 am 6:06 am
“Obama is not only unelectable on a national basis, he couldn’t be elected US senator in any state other than Illinois.”
Yet he’s going to be our next president. Funny how that happens isn’t it?
Posted by: Cartier boy | May 18, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am
Yes, Senator, Kennedy and Reagan talked with out adversaries. Kennedy spoke, with the Air Force General Curtis E LeMay built in his back pocket and an offensive nuclear missile system that even scared us. Ronald Reagan talked with everyone, and kindly. But, when he went to the summit table protocols were followed and he had the might of the U.S. Military in his coat pocket. As we have now embarked on becoming a 3rd world country, our bargaining power will soon diminish. However, we should and will speak with our adversaries, Sir. I’m not sure what language we will use or what strength our economy will possess, but we will talk. Keep in mind though, Senator, if all you can bring to the table is talk, there is no point in going. Unless, of course, that is your mission.
Posted by: jggrimm | May 18, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am
“We should never negotiate out of fear, but we should never fear to negotiate.” — JFK
Wise words.
Posted by: Bob, DC | May 18, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am
cmyvote2008: Obama simply misspoke, he meant 47 states. Good grief.
Posted by: Bob, DC | May 18, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am
I don’t get the Bush/McCain logic that just negotiating with an enemy somehow elevates that enemy. There might a be a small bit of truth to it but it all depends on how it is done. You certainly don’t want to have photo-ops and handshaking ceremonies and such. Most of it should be done behind the scenes with little publicity. The negotiations have to be serious, hard-nosed and to the point and that’s it.
Posted by: Bob, DC | May 18, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am
“Trust, but Verify” — Ronald Reagan.
I actually think Ronnie would be on Obama’s side in this debate.
Posted by: Bob, DC | May 18, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am
There is one indisputable fact — the policies and practices of the US did not depose Castro from power in Cuba. Nearly 50 years of not speaking directly with Fidel has brought us to where we are today. Cubans are living in poverty, expatriate Cubans in the US are estranged from their families and only old age has caused the slightest of change in the leadership of Cuba. Heck, even the USSR crumbled nearly 20 years ago after direct talks ensued.
It wasn’t until Gorbachev explained it directly to Reagan in Iceland that relations between the USSR and the West were going to change.
And, as we all know, Reagan was quite proud of claiming that he negotiated with Iran to release the hostages right after he was elected even though it was Carter’s administration that had successfully negotiated with Iran.
The hypocrisy of the Bush and McCain policy statements is nauseating.
Posted by: G | May 18, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am
Negotiate from strenght?
With the state of this country how can we possibly negotiate with any other government when ours is so weak at this moment in time. Economically speaking with our foriegn debt, the dollar at historic lows, dependence on foriegn oil, unspeakably high national debt and manufacturing outsourced to the point of extinction, we certaintly can’t use economic power to influence.
When speaking of military might, we are over stretched with our military, bogged down in an unwinable war, while terriorists strike everywhere our military is present in the world and then add to this the lack of respect for our foriegn policy world wide.
So, back to the original question, how do we negotiate from a position of strenght?
We first have to fix at least some of what I have alluded to above, which means we will have to wait for the next administartion to fix some of these ills before we can begin attempt to influence foriegn policy in the world.
As I see it, the next president to be should not be talking about negotiating with any country until we have repaired our own strenght is this country and the world.
Posted by: Average Joe | May 18, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am
Csquan: From the beginning, Obama already had the financial backing needed to run his race and Obama knew he will get the young white voters with Orpha’s support. But. he was not sure about the black voters and was having trouble getting their support. So we played the race card to ensure the black votes. And, the black voters turned against the Clintons. Major of the black voters strongly believe that Obama is going to make major changes that will rules in their favor but they do not understand that Obama must and will take care of his financial backers (high-level white supporters) before helping anyone. Obama will be okay.
Posted by: cookie | May 18, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
Once again Obama has shown courage of a true leader. He has taken the bull by its horns rather than perform a cowardly at of the past 8 years of sending someone else’s brave sons and daughters in the harms way. Time and time again history has shown that lasting peace and prosperity can only be achieved through talking to you your enemies or even communicating from a position of strength to your enemies and letting them know the consequences of their aggression. Even Bush has done that effectively when knowing that Pakistan was harboring terrorists (including Osama Bin Laden) and strongly behind nurturing the Taleban he dispatched his strongman to send a very clear message that if Pakistan (at least at the government level) does not co-operate with the US on the war on terrorism that Pakistan will become a parking lot. What if Saddam was given the same message that he leave or he would be humiliated and defeated and his wealth confiscated, he would have left too. So military might does not have to be used to bring change, it has to be the last solution to any problem. Time and time again wars could have been avoided if peaceful measures were given a chance. There are impasses around the world and hardened positions that are obstacles to peace but that does not mean they should resort to war. If America promotes democracy and if undesired elements (Hammas in Palestine or the Maoist in Nepal) gain power by renouncing violence and by democratic means then the least the US has to do is to communicate with them and put down the conditions for governing their people and their interaction with the world. A new world order is in order and while we need Obama for fighting recession in the USA, we need him to change the dynamics in the world to restore America’s credibility and importance in the world and if that can be achieved by peaceful means, without unnecessary conflicts and wars, more power to him. What has the US policy towards Cuba accomplished in 50 years. We need to let loose Jimmy Carter (the greatest ex-president and peace maker in US history) to talk peace with anyone who has a desire to make peace. He should not be insulted by any administration in requiring their consent to make peace as was the case with his talks with Hammas. So my dear fellow Americans, ask not what the world can do for peace ask what America can do for world peace and the first step is to change the mindset in Washington by electing a dynamic new leader with innovative ideas and a new vision for America. It is time for a change.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | May 18, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
cookie : agree….some people will be sold out, and I think I know who they will be …so invoking JFK kinda sets the stage for a bad omen.
Posted by: csquan | May 18, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
Um no they didn’t negotiate with terrorists.
You are no JFK or Reagan Mr Obama. You are naive, inexperienced and unqualified for the job.
Rigging caucuses will not make you President.
Posted by: s.b. | May 18, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
“I speak as someone who studied International Relations on the graduate level at Tufts University!!!”
Well, quite obviously, sir, you didn’t study very hard, because you didn’t learn much more than how to twist the truth. None of the diplomatic successes to which Obama makes reference were accomplished without preliminary informal talks, often through intermediaries, of which the public-a-large had no knowledge. The United States is currently engaged in such a diplomatic effort with Hamas, with Egypt acting as the intermediary. And guess what? Our government has officially stated that Hamas is a terrorist organization that it unequivically says it will not negotiate with. So once again, we have a candidate – Obama – who has the intergrity to tell the truth and another – McCain – who tells war-mongers what they want to hear, knowing full well that it is a lie.
Posted by: Reality in America | May 18, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
BHO = nice guy, liberal ideals … courage I am not sure … naive,for sure.
We will be in for a ride.
Posted by: csquan | May 18, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Meanwhile Bush is paying insurgents $10 a day to protect their local villages, negotiating with insurgents to go after the Al Quada in Iraq. Once that money stops flowing and the insurgents have compiled enough of an arsenal to continue their civil war the violence will start again. Bush is hoping that all heck breaks loose once he leaves so the Republicans can point fingers at the new Dem president. Good old politics.
Posted by: Greg McDonald | May 18, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
A comment about those women who are going to leave the party, and not vote, or vote for McCain. How truly sad people you are. Even I, an Obama supporter, would put aside my own temper tantrum and vote for Hillary. I cannot believe how childish some people are being. The fact is she won’t be the nominee, since the rules she agreed to (when she thought it would all be over on Super Tuesday) was that it was a delegate race. She needs to take a page from Al Gore’s playbook. How he put the interests of the constitution before his own political trophy. Now look at his stature among the world. If John McCain can run when he is 72, why can’t Hillary wait 8 years. Hmm, it seems like sour grapes. The best known political brand was beaten by an upstart. The feminists who say they will sit this out or vote for McCain, are truly not intersted in reversing course for their sons/daughters, nor about human rights, nor about helping people find healthcare, nor reversing no-child left behind, nor intersested in a solid solution for the economy. How truly sad!
Posted by: hopeful America | May 18, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Moses negotiated from a position of strength and with CONDITIONS… BHO ?
Posted by: csquan | May 18, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Obama wins this debate with most Americans. We are tired of in-your-face “cowboy politics” and we see it does not work plus its very very expensive. Obama/Clark 08 or Obama/Webb O8. Either one deflates McCain perceived military experience advantage.
Posted by: Bob, DC | May 18, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Akeem,
You’re right – not many Americans travel overseas, read other English-speaking countries’ news, or speak with anyone who isn’t exactly like them. We have a large population of very closed-minded, ego-centric people who cannot see beyond their own fears (those who are not like them). Those people fail to see how Barack Obama will be an excellent President because they cannot get past his differences. Fortunately, each year, they are becoming less and less relevant. And, I hope that in November, that will become apparent – especially to them.
Posted by: Triple Digit IQ | May 18, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Why are conservatives so afraid of the word ‘liberal’? It’s related to the word ‘liberty’ – something you all love.
Stop letting Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly manipulate you into acting so irrationally. Liberal isn’t a bad word any more than ‘liberty’ is.
Posted by: Triple Digit IQ | May 18, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Obama does not have one single thing to recommend as POTUS. Write in Hillary and send a message to the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Tom in MA | May 18, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
The word Liberal in the UK is merely descriptive and neutral. Only right wing hatemongers could possibly see it as a negative.
Posted by: Alan Fitzgerald | May 18, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
The empty bag of wind shoots off his mouth again. As a Hillary Democrat, I support John should Hillary be rolled by the party leadership and the super delegates. Sickening. John McCain has given great service to our Nation in war and peace. John can be trusted with the security of America.
Posted by: benvictor | May 18, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Thinking: what about the Obama, Wright, farrakhan policy. Much better – Wright???
Posted by: kRuss | May 18, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Thinking: what about the Obama, Wright, farrakhan policy. Much better – Wright???
Posted by: kRuss | May 18, 2008 10:32:47 AM
what are you referring to if you dont mind me asking
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 18, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
I can tell you people are either for HIllary, and writing false propaganda on this site or are Republicans, who can’t see that McBush is only for war, money and oil! You guys are living in a fantancy world!
Obama is leading in all the polls, thank God! He is the only one with the intelligence, level-headedness, foresight and honesty to lead this nation! Maybe he isn’t the most experienced but you people elected Bush twice and neither was he, nor was JFK when he took office. JFK had good judgement tho, which Obama has, and McBush does not!! And yes, I think trying to talk things out can’t hurt!
It may give other countries a better opinion of us! Obama in 08!
P.S. I am a white, older woman with a H.S. diploma and some college!
Posted by: sharong58 | May 18, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
well I can see that so many are uneducated here. One says russia and China didn’t attack us, but China helped the opposition in viet-nam and Look what happened with the russians in afghanistan, or having nuclear missles pointed at us. I am very confident in Mr. Obama’s abilities. Some of the trolls around here should read a book once in a while and get over themselves b/c if they don’t our country WILL fall and that is no joke.
Posted by: DUHDUH | May 18, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Seems like Republican trash has meeting here. Oh well at least here they have a feeling their are going to win…so let it be…:)
McBush is old senile surrounded by people like Lie-berman, Rove ect…I hope people send them where they belong and it is history…and I hope next cycle Republicans come with someone better. Last 8 years was disaster so it is time to start some repairing work.
Posted by: JR | May 18, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
I think Hillary and McCain are traditional candidates. They will do alright. Come on guys you know it. McCain is much better than Bush. And Hillary is much better than McCain. But Obama, hmm we do not know a whole lot. And that makes him so attractive. We want something different and if we do not have Obama, we will always wonder “What if Obama would have become the President?” And so I am willing to take this bet. Some people say Obama will destory America. Take a hike. A president cannot destroy America if people do not it destoryed. We have other pillars of power which can check the President. So my fellow American, “Support Obama”.
Posted by: Al, San Francisco | May 18, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I bet many of you haters watch fox news all day. Oh yeah that will even further out of touch with true peace.
Posted by: tony | May 18, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Bush Adminstration have been having DIRECT TALKS with Iranians about Iraq. Read the news!!
and then he blames Obama for it?
Hypocricy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: DavidEt | May 18, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
JFK was a decorated war hero with 14 years in Congress before he ran for President. Any comparison to Obama is laughable.
Obama is a good comparison with Bush; however. Inexperienced, controlled by the people around him, relying heavily on the input of advisors, running on a theme of change. Yep, two peas in a pod.
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 18, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Sue, Why are you still selling Hillary? Hillary ran out money running her campaign. She can’t run the country out money because Bush already did that.
Posted by: tony | May 18, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
To all the many Hillary supporters above who think you are smart voting for McCain after she legitimately loses the Democratic nomination (because count FL and MI or not – she is still losing):
Ever hear of “biting off your nose to spite your face”?
Posted by: voiceofcalm | May 18, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
well….I will have to say that abcnews is the only place left where both sides are stil having a decent debate.
We get the sense the same folks who finance BHO are ones paying MSNBC and CNN … and Fox, clearly not a place where DEMS nor liberals hang out
Posted by: csquan | May 18, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
We don’t have diplomacy with bad guys? Isn’t that what Bush is doing in North Korea? Not only are we engaged in diplomacy , didn’t he also give them food and aid in exchange for not building nukes (appeasement)? BUSH IS, as usual, DECEIVING YOU! Knowing the above, what makes him an authority on how to deal with terrorists? Didn’t he also create more terrorists and fanatics than ever by illegally invading Iraq?
Posted by: Scott | May 18, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Scott :….but it is something else to sit down with HAMAS like Carter did. Not sure if it is appeasement but it weakens us for sure
Posted by: csquan | May 18, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Other than appearing to be a nice smart guy, what exactly is Obama’s appeal? I wish he had more national experience.Frankly, I think he’s dangerous.
Posted by: mmiller | May 18, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
For the record, Obama mentioned JFK on Friday in his speech, before Ted Kennedy went to the hospital.
Geeze.
Posted by: JWC | May 18, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Well said William B:)
Posted by: gw | May 18, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Most Republicans are filled with anger and they are easily manipulated by the GOP because they just point to groups and say “see your life sucks because of the liberals, your life sucks because of the gays, your life sucks because of the illegal immigrants, etc. They give them a scapegoat for their anger and self loathing so they don’t have to look inward at themselves and try to be forgiving and tolerant of others. John Dean (a Republican) and others have talked about it in their books and I have lived it in my own family. It will take many years for these people to take a serious look inside to see that their anger is coming from fear and that they really have nothing to fear. Now I know some right winger will say “see you liberals don’t know that there are terrorists out there who want to kill us and we need to kill them first.” Well, I would say that if we start dealing with other countries more fairly instead of bullying them we will gain their respect and they won’t raise their children to want to destroy us. But the fearful won’t hear this for many, many years.
Posted by: wideawakenow | May 18, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
McCain has nothing to explain; both McCain and JFK served the Nation in War. The annointed one of Teddy got his crown from Teddy and did nothing to deserve this. I supported JFK and would support McCain. Why support the annointed one? He has dissed Small-Town America, he has dissed rural America, he has dissed working class whites; his wife was not proud of America until the annointed one was annointed; he has very troubling associates like his pastor. The annointed one is anything but JFK, not even close. Pathetic comes to mind.
Posted by: benvictor | May 18, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Lynn,
Please note that he is speaking of Iran and Cuba when he says he will sit down and negotiate. He is not speaking about Iran or Hamas. I really hate it when people just spew out BS Republican talking points without knowing the facts. He is speaking about doing the exact same things as both JFK and Reagan did. Take away the man for a moment and listen to the message. You might just find out it is not the message you hate, but the messenger.
Posted by: Me | May 18, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Good to see Obama fighting the neocons and winning!!! Thats what the neocons are so afraid of.
Finally, we are going to have a president thats smart and handsome too! Wow…its almost unimaginable.
Obama 08
Posted by: Buzzbee1 | May 18, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
For those who don’t check history, allow me to bring you up to date. JFK held secret meetings with Kruschev from 1960 to his death in 1963. And a lot of the communication was in the form of letters between the two. Both leaders spoke frequently by telephone. Overlooked is the fact that many of the communicative letters were formatted and sent to Kruschev on our early computers. Look it up. The communication was called diplomacy, which is like a tricky dance of one leader trying to bluff the other. It was this dance that caused Kruschev to back down in the Cuban Missle Crises and dismantle his missiles that were installed there.
Posted by: Shazam | May 18, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Obama is always referring to Reagan so I am wondering if he is more like Reagan than JFK.
Also is he comparing Iran with soviet unino. can’t he see that Iran is not a predictable country as opposed to Union soviet. His lack of experience is talking again.
Posted by: tony1118 | May 18, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Talking with sinners is the Christian thing to do – Matthew 9: 9-13. Proving our purity by only preaching to the choir changes nothing.
Posted by: Jeff | May 18, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Bush criticized Obama for his statements regarding Pakistan and Ahmadinejad early in Obama’s campaign.
Factually, Obama has not advocated either for attacking Pakistan or embracing Ahmadinejad. Obama has said that the U.S. should be willing to strike against al Qaeda targets in Pakistan if the country’s president Pervez Musharraf refuses. Obama also said during a debate last year that he was willing to meet with leaders of Iran and other U.S. rivals without preconditions, although he did not commit to doing so.
Obama’s chief rival, Sen. Hillary Clinton, has also criticized Obama for his remarks on Pakistan and for being willing to meet with foreign leaders.
Obama’s campaign responded, “Of course President Bush would attack the one candidate in this race who opposed his disastrous war in Iraq from the start. But Barack Obama doesn’t need any foreign policy advice from the architect of the worst foreign policy decision in a generation,” said spokesman Bill Burton.
And some of you claim you will vote for McSame for more of the same? Which leads me to the next question. Have our nation’s school systems eliminated History as a mandatory subject?
Posted by: Peace Monger | May 18, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
As a Republican, I think it’s time we (and everyone else) face the fact that not only do we R’s not have some special talent for guaranteeing the security of this nation, the actions of George Bush during these last two terms have undermined our security to the point where we risk becoming a paper tiger.
When George H. Bush invaded Kuwait in 1993, he sent 540,000 American soldiers, who acted in concert with some 250,000 more coalition allied soldiers. George W. Bush has sent 150,000 of our best soldiers to perform a task which is probably a hundred times larger and more complex than simply removing the Iraqi army from Kuwait. We have now been there longer than it took to win World War II. We have spent nearly $1-Trillion on the war to date, money we did not have to spend (we borrowed it from the Chinese, Japanese, and the Saudi Royal Family, among others). Because Bush never actually sold the American public on the notion that Iraq posed a “grave threat to our national security”, he has never been able to mobilize the country as a whole in support of the war effort. The result has been that a small number of our volunteer army has been flogged to the breaking point, and there is no end in sight. We are now allowing convicted felons and members of domestic gangs to sign up for the military in order to meet quotas. We are filling in the gaps in our military force by paying billions to companies like Blackwater, who in turn pay 6-figure incomes to mercenaries willing to go to Iraq for hard cash (and lots of it). And yet, Bush opposes legislation which would simply guarantee that our reserve soldiers can pay the full cost of tuition for the college education they were promised when they signed up.
It may not be noticeable to most, but our military personnel have begun to question the basic issue of duty to serve their country when they find their fellow citizens not willing to lift a finger to support them or the war in any way which require ordinary citizens to make sacrifices. It is astounding to me that our government quickly approved what amounted to a gift-certificate to taxpayers that cost $150-Billion (in more borrowed funds) as a so-called ‘stimulus’, but balks at approving $70-Billion to fill in the gaps in the GI Bill which would allow our reservists to go to college. These are not the policies and practices which guarantee we will be ready to fight the next war with the same skill and commitment which has been demonstrated by our soldiers in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Meanwhile, back at the economy, while George Bush has been holding the line on tax-cuts, the dollars people are keeping rather than paying in taxes are worth %30 less today than they were when he took office. But its been demonstrated that this is the best course politically, because American taxpayers don’t seem to notice. Unfortunately, the financial markets and investors around the world have taken notice, which is why our economy is not only in a recession, it is teetering on a magnitude 7 or 8 seismic collapse, something akin to what just happened in China, albeit in financial terms.
The connection to our security as a nation is obvious. The Soviet Union caved in partly because of it’s moral vacancy, but in large part because their economy was unable to pay the price-tag for keeping up with a nation with a viable free-enterprise capitalistic system. As George W. Bush has nearly doubled our foreign debt in just under 8 years, our national balance sheet is a complete disaster. If you don’t believe me, go to http://www.cia.gov and look up a comparison between our financial condition and say, China.
I found it extremely amusing that George Bush generously offered to send $500,000 to the Chinese in disaster relief. It’s kind of like sending a gift to the Bank of America, and using your Bank of America credit card to pay for it. President Bush obviously enjoys playing the role of the big-brother who helps everybody out in time of crisis. The Problem is, we already owe the Chinese something like $400-Billion (out of a total foreign debt of $12-Trillion), and we’re borrowing more every week. Meanwhile, in our cash account (according to the CIA), we have approximately $65-Billion in hard cash. China on the other hand, has $1.5-Trillion in hard cash, and their foreign debt is not quite $400-Billion.
In other words, China could write a check and pay off their entire foreign debt any time they want, and still have over $1-Trillion in the bank (so to speak). We on the other hand, barely have enough cash on hand to make our minimum monthly payment on our national credit card. And yet we’re offering to send them a few bucks for disaster relief.
When I hear John McCain starting to parrot the ‘tough talk’ of George W. Bush, and suggest that somehow making threats and posturing that Iran resembles in some way Nazi Germany constitutes a deterrent to our enemies, I am amazed that there are still citizens out there willing to buy into it. If any country has resembled Nazi Germany lately it has been the United States, with our relentless bombing of civilian targets, our suspension of civil-liberties domestically and outrageous human rights violations against foreign nationals (who have nothing whatsoever to do with any terrorists), not to mention our use of torture which violates the Geneva conventions. And we are supposed to believe this has made us safer? Has anyone noticed the global metastasis of terrorist organizations, fueled in part by massive numbers of new recruits who actually do believe that America is now the ‘evil-empire’. Under George W. Bush, I think we have been.
The comparison of Obama with John F. Kennedy is entirely apt. Kennedy’s patient diplomacy under extreme pressure during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 prevented a nuclear war, even when all his military advisers were recommending a retaliatory strike at Cuba which would almost certainly have led to direct conflict with the Soviet Union (aka: a nuclear war). Not only do I feel more secure with a President who has Obama’s temperament, I absolutely don’t want a hot-head like Hillary Clinton answering the phone at 3am if it happens to ring. If by chance she does end up being elected President, let’s just hope the Red-phone is on Bill’s side of the bed (or in Bill’s bedroom, as the case may be.)
Posted by: ted in pdx | May 18, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Give it a break people, if you don’t want to Obama than that is your right, but don’t spew ugly lies, and false information about him, it sounds soooo uneducated!!!! For the record Obama did not say he was JFK, listen and stop looking for things to take out of context!!! I do beleive JFk’s daughter Caroline said Obama inspires people the way her fater did(not an exact quote).
Also some of you made refernce to Rev. Wright, give it up it’s not going to work, those words came out of Rev. Wrights mouth Not Obama, and Rev. has the right to feel they way he does, some may not agree with him, and though I don’t agree with all of Rev. wrights statement. ome of them are very true, America has many sins to pay for, and the chickens will come home to roost again, wheter we like to hear it not, it’s a truth that America is so ready to hear!!!!
Posted by: Iris | May 18, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Did it ever occurred to any of you who are CLEARLY so much smarter than Senator Obama when it comes to foreign policy to run for office? Oh, so you’re smart about foreign policy, but not smart enough to run for President? Or could it be you don’t have a clue how the Office of the President functions? So Let me tell you, he doesn’t have to make his own coffee and he has access to hundreds even thousands of experts on virtually every subject and he gets to make the hard decisions …. by the way read the article on Obama writing about Obama. That will provide you some insight. We have a gifted highly intelligent person running for office and since that has to be a shock to the system of anyone who has lived through the past eight years of the White House inhabitants…we understand your skepticism…but gosh not only can this guy spell, among other things,he has written two book and taught Constitutional Law. Somebody smart in the White House? I know it will take a lot of getting used to…but we can do it. Obama “08 For sore losers I think Huckabee has a website
Posted by: anghiari | May 18, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
I am still blowing smoke out my ears about the fact that Bush used the greatest calamity that ever befell the Jewish people in a partisan shot and did it in front of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament. Bush has endangered Israel with every step he has taken. He has empowered Iran. He has stupidly pushed for “elections” in the Palestianian Authority despite requests from the Palestinians themselves, thus setting up HAMAS in Gaza.
He and his Christian Zionist friends want Israel populated by Jews so that Jesus can slaughter them when he returns — if he returns. His grandfather traded with the Nazis. His father’s advisor said of the Jews “f**k ‘em. They didn’t vote for us.” Now a cynical use of Jews for partisan points??? Is there any limit to the depths he will plumb? I think not.
Posted by: Karen, New York | May 18, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Anyone in American society willing to pick up a book and read anymore? How about a history book, or get off your fat rear and Google some history?
We’ve had to endure seven years of lies and corruption, endless war and wingnut reality. The history books say it plainly: If your buy into the fear message, you’ll give up your rights as citizens.
Welcome to the Bush?McSame world. Want four more years of Karl Rove “Twilight Zone”?
Posted by: kit wilson | May 18, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Republicians are in trouble…..Democratic President and 60 seats…….They are right THEY ARE LIKE DOG FOOD
Posted by: tr | May 18, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Conduct talks with governments that are recognized by the UN. Conduct well-planned peace talks with any recognized government when it is prudent. NEVER conduct talks with terrorists. They are NOT a country nor recognized by the UN. Therein lies the difference, folks.
Posted by: LadyAtty | May 18, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Obama should give this up!
The more he talks the more naive and
weak he appears to be!
JFK did not negotiate with Krushchev
one on one! He demanded, not asked,
that Krushchev remove the Cuban Missile
sites that the Soviets had constructed
in Cuba! This was known as the Cuban
Missile Crisis, Senator Obama!
Kennedy ordered a Naval Blockade to prevent Soviet ships from landing in Cuban ports! Kennedy was dealing from strength not weakness! No Kumbaya there!
President Reagan giving the go ahead to
the SDI program was not a negotiation!
It was a warning that we would not stand idly by while the Soviets pointed
their missiles at us and our European
allies! “Mr Gorbachov tear down this wall” was not a Kumbaya moment!
Peace through strength that is the theme
that runs through the Kennedy foreign policy and the Reagan foreign policy!
Nixon speaking directly to the
Chinese Government cannot be compared
to speaking directly to Iran!
The Chinese Government was not a state
sponsor of terrorism and the Chinese
never said they wanted to destroy the
U.S. or Israel!
This comparison once again shows how
Naive and Inexperienced Mr Obama is!
Does anyone really want to entrust the
safety and security of our nation with
Senator Obama?
Posted by: reaganfan | May 18, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Eric: The 911 terrorists were primarily Saudis. Most of them were then camping out in Afghanistan and the Pakistan NW Frontier and not anywhere near Iraq. Bush is asking for more oil from the Saudis not threatening war with them. Anybody who had truly read up before supporting the Iraq war would have learned a basic Mid-East religious fundamental as in Sunni and Shia hatreds and non-Muslims moving into their lands. Saddam Hussein was a Sunni and yes, a monster. He shared power with nobody. Now he is dead. The 80% Iraqi Shias are making friends with their Iranian co-religionists while we are bogged down. They are not falling into our arms with gratitude. Now half of the newly elected Kuwaiti Parliament has been taken over by Islamists. I fully supported the Afghan War but was one of the paltry 20% labeled as traitors for my protests against going into Iraq. History shows that opening two war fronts is often a disaster. We, America, need less emotional responses but instead a brutally cold and hard calculating eye when dealing with the Mid-East. They have a trait few Westerners seem to have – long-term patience by the leaders and plotters and planners. I gloomingly suspect some are already planning to test the new Administration and American people with another attempted attack. Our borders and ports are still not secure, nor airports. Are Intelligence Agencies better equipped now to realize what is valuable information to be followed up after missing the ball last time? Sadly, a lot of our ‘friends’ are more than upset with the US for its polices over the last seven to eight years. This LOL is not going to have her vote influenced by gender, race or age and even less by fear mongering. To toss one back to Bush, Hitler used fear tactics against the Jews to rally the German people to Nazism. No point in trying it on me. I will hit the Library for books, try websites, do my research and connect the dots as to outcomes and say my piece to protect America and its troops from needless slaughter. Oil! As Leon Uris wrote in Exodus, “The Kingdom of Heaven runs on righteousness, but the Kingdom of Earth runs on oil” or words to that effect. Now to go snarl at a gas pump since I have to fill up! Tony1118: The USSR no longer exists. Iran and Russia are closely linked in numerous ways. Russia is far from predictable with the KGB trained Putin still pulling the strings and wanting to restore its power – and Russia has billions in gas and oil revenues to spend instead of crippling debt to deal with. Yes, their military arsenal is currently decrepit, but their nukes and technology are not. Russia even without its satellite countries is still massive with lots of untapped natural resources. I am keeping my eye on them too! Putin has been doing some sabre rattling at times.
Posted by: KiwiTricia | May 18, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Kennedy never once caved into Kruschev. He literally demanded or else….THAT is why Kruschev backed down – not because of “patient” diplomacy. We were as close to nuclear war as we have ever been and Kennedy with his brother never once caved into Kruschev’s bullying demands. THAT was standing tough. Obama is no JFK. Not even close. So close that door. It won’t fly
Posted by: Jill | May 18, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Hey people, when you are making A critical comment, how about quoting the candidate directly instead of regurgitating the spin of some pundit or party operative. For example, did Sen. Obama ever actually say he wanted to hold hands with Iranian leaders and sing Kumbaya? Don’t you realize you been brainwashed when you just repeat things you have heard on TV? Did Obama ever say he wanted to circumvent diplomatic channels in talking to our enemies? If he did, provide the quote and let’s debate that. If you are going to just spew propaganda you have heard some pundit on TV say, that’s “pathetic”.
Posted by: Elliott Shannonhouse | May 18, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Debbie and all you other um, people.
Just because Hillary was the first woman to run for President doesn’t mean she is the right choice. I want to see a woman president, but I am not going to blindly support her because she has, well you know. I am 28 and female and she doesn’t represent me. That is where this nasty talk towards Obama is coming from, bitterness. Hell hath no fury like a woman thinking she has been scorned, but please, Debbie, stop having tantrums and look up some real facts before you get on here and humiliate yourself. You think you sound smart but you are just a bitter old fool is my guess. I can’t wait until the older generation fades away, that generation scarred by sexism and racial profiling, and hate. It is you who have kept the USA what it is. Stop bickering and look at the facts because my children are going to be here , going to middle school long after you have passed and your choices will effect the nation.
I now await the incredibly “smart” responses that are sure to come. Dear God go home you people, your KKK hoods and menopause are showing.
Posted by: Maria | May 18, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Obama is not the problem!
Problem are stupid Americans that think America is The World!
This forum shows ample evidence of our stupidity. We are the laughing stock of the world! They wonder how can nation of 300 million people elect such idiots like G. W. Bush and now have a candidate such as John McCain winning republican nomination and possibly the presidency. Both Clinton and Obama stand as giants next to likes of GW and Keating John. The only reason John McCain wants to become president is because his father was a Navy Admiral and he must top it. If GW and Keating John were true patriots and intelligent human beings, they would recognize their limitations and run for a village mayor’s office instead.
I feel ashamed when I see on national TV that bumbling idiot we call our president.
I live in an unusually stupid country!
We are not worthy of this land!
Posted by: Observer | May 18, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
LynnS said:
“Does Obama realize that the Russians or Chinese did not attack us?”
The philosopher, George Santayana, said “those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it.”
Have you never heard of the Cold War? The Cold War is over because of diplomacy and talking to “the enemy.”
Try giving up Fox News. Just for a week. Read. Maybe you’ll learn something.
Posted by: lm945 | May 18, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
ABC: China uses the pinyin system; you should too. It’s not Mao Tse-tung anymore. It’s Mao Zedong. FYI.
Posted by: Damon | May 18, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Nostradamus was wrong about Obama.
The antichrist is ulgy!
Posted by: Sarah Alton | May 18, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
I agree with Observer. Well mostly everything. America needs to realize that we are not the beacon of perfection and justice we think it is.
WE TORTURE PEOPLE AND INVADE COUNTRIES. WE ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN OUR ENEMIES.
What are we saying as a people? Its pathetic really.
Posted by: BJ | May 18, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Well…..there you go again Mr. Obama! Using excellent elocution to compare apples to oranges!! John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan had months and months of lower diplomatic level talks to prepare for direct Presidential talks….nothing like what Obama has said — direct talks immediately with no pre-conditions,
Posted by: MDB | May 18, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Maria, do not presume to knock the older Americans in this country. They are part of the “Greatest Generation” that ever lived. Those folks who lived during and beyond WW2 have a work ethic and integrity that the majority of today’s youth will never come close to understanding. For that matter, neither will your spoiled generation of “me first.” As for making this nation what it is, you’re darn right they did. We are free today because of their sacrifice. So as an older, much more mature woman, I say go back to your text messaging and iPod. That’s your legacy and a pitiful one it is.
Posted by: LadyAtty | May 18, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
JOHN MCCAIN IS A TRAITOR.
HE RATTED OUT HIS FELLOW PWS DELIBERATELY.
UPON RETURN, HE DENIED ANY MIAS WERE STILL IN NAM.
HE IS A DIRTY RAT.
I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR MCCAIN.
http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm
http://www.ojc.org/powforum/capital/mccain/671109.HTM
Posted by: VIET_VET_PLEIKU | May 18, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
JFK is not the best example on foreign policy for Obama to use. Kennedy was a disaster in foreign affairs. Does Obama want Vietnam, Bay of Pigs, Cuban missile crisis, Turkey……….. The international community saw JFK as a wimp and disaster. Some in American media try to rewrite the JFK history, but it stands very clear as a disaster for the country. Is this what Obama is proposing?
Posted by: William | May 18, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
LETTER TO MR.OBAMA:
Mr.Obama,
You have been out on National Television and sporting how you are going to announce yourself the presumptive winner on May 20 Really? And just who do you think is going to believe this?
It is also reported that you are trying to win over Hillary’s supporters. Well let’s think about this for a moment shall we. Over the course of this campaign you have trashed Hillary unmercifully. You have had your thugs on the ground ripping up her signs, sending her people out of the voting places, lying and treating them like they are a disease. You have trashed her husband, a former President of the United States, rigged voting places and stuffed ballot boxes in caucuses all over the nation. You have used every dirty trick in the book to get your way. You are now saying on the 20 of May you will declare yourself the winner and this leaves the voters of Florida and Michigan where? Since the committee meets on May 31 to determine what is happening with them it leaves them totally out of the equation? You have gone out of your way to disenfranchise them and have cheated and used dirty politics at every turn in this election and now you want to get us to vote for you?
Take this to the bank Mr. Elitist that there is no way that even IF you somehow steal the nomination that a true Hillary supporter will even look in your direction. We are not idiots (as portrayed on the news media) we are people who work hard and yes, many of us are degreed people…(have you fainted yet at this revelation) and the simple fact is we do not like you, your tactics, politics, nor your bitter, racist, un-American and angry wife.
You said you know there are hard feelings? Really? You, Dean, Brazile and Pelosi are the ones who created them. Do you honestly think that one single woman or man who supports Hillary Clinton will support you after the way you have beat up on her and her loyal supporters? Think again sir.
Here is my personal take on you MR. Obama. You say on the 20 you shall declare YOURSELF the winner. Is this after you walk on water and raise the dead? Is this when they give you a crown and a pretty robe to wear with access to the vault of crown jewels and lead you to your throne? Then all your loyal subjects get down on their knees and worship you? I sir will not be one of them.
To me my vote is precious, a freedom given to us by our American founding fathers and fought for by the blood of many of them. I do not take it lightly nor do I support a candidate just to be on the presumed winning team which you sir are not a member of.
Based off of your lies, of Rezko, Ayers, Dohrn, Bittergate, Naftagate, Wright, Farrakhan, Million Man March, your terrorist brother in Kenya, your actions, your Chicago style politics and your anti-American actions of refusing to salute the flag or wear the pin as well as your racist attitude of whites, the anti American racist attitude of your wife I would never cast a vote for you. I am not one of the blind sheep, will never follow you and would never so much as cast a glance in your direction. Like the man in the restaurant in Indiana, I will wave you off as he later told reporters “I can’t stand him” and guess what I feel the same. I am an American first, a woman second, and a Democrat third. I would vote for a true American even if it is out of my party before I would ever cast a vote for an un-American individual such as yourself. Your actions have spoken a whole lot louder than your words.
So, declare yourself the winner Elitist on the 20 and watch how fast people make fun of you for this and you become the laughing stock of the country. We shall delight here in Florida and in Michigan to watch you go down in flames if you ever do get to be the nominee because guess what? Hillary does have a very good chance of beating the tar out of you and I am hoping that she pulls it off. Go ahead and have your thugs riot in Denver because there are a lot of jail cells for them waiting. We are not scared of these threats and we will in fact fight back and hard with our votes. Get over it Obama, you will never be the president and you have set back relations between blacks and whites in this country over 100 years and have created a division in the party that will not be healed. Be proud of yourself elitist as it has been all about you.
With deepest sympathy for your failure…..NOT:
Lisa from Florida
Posted by: Lisa | May 18, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Virginia
Obama’s pathetic knowledge of past talks between nations, is truly frightening. Kennedy and Reagan OPENED TALKS WITH nations thru proper channels, NOT MERELY TALKS AT, WITHOUT CERTAINTY THAT THERE WAS AN AGENDA AND A BASIS FOR DISCUSSION.
…………….
If ignorance was a disease, you’d be dead.
Posted by: Gemma | May 18, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Astounding the level of hatred and fear on this comment list.
Just because Obama says he is going to talk to those who are so wounded that they need to act in hurtful and destructive ways does not mean he will not set it up properly.
The defenders of the status quo are so up in arms at the idea of things really changing around here all they can do is attack Obama.. as there is really no defense for Bush/McCain. Really – how could anyone do worse than Bush has done for our country?
And both Hillary and McCain are cut from the same cloth. I personally am willing to take a chance on Obama -because he is committed to peace.
I am tired of this endless warmongering and so is everyone else I know. Kids need better schools, we all need the problems in THIS country taken care of.
–TIRED of being the Bad Cop of the World.
Posted by: lizr | May 18, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
If we dont talk to our enemies,our “friends” the Chinese will talk to them. I see some commentators here look at America as of now, but we need to think of America of tomorrow if we really love America.The McCains are driving America to a dead end, just like the Romans did to there empire. All we need now is to stop being ignorant and place our selves on top of the global platform. Those who have sense know what I mean.
Posted by: Iddt | May 18, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
I have never seen ignorant people like americans. Not all of them, but they are not the sharpest knife in the kitchen. They have a chance to bring their country back to glory but their ‘big ego’ will not a llow them. Good luck americans. GOOD LUCK!!! I dont know who they will be blame if they put back another Bush legacy again.
Posted by: EUROPEAN | May 18, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Robin,in New Hampshire “The president who pointed to the moon as our new frontier” that Obama referred to in his concession speech(The famous “Yes we can!”) was indeed JFK and no Kennedy was ill and no emotion was exploited…Stop seeing what isn’t there!
Posted by: McSamefatigue | May 18, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
It says a great deal about President Bush’s blank incomprehension of the whole concept of diplomacy that he cannot tell the difference between dialogue and “appeasement.” To a man for whom power means no more than brute force, the possibility of winning a victory free of bloodshed, through effective negotiation, is unthinkable.
No wonder the Bush administration’s entire foreign policy has been a failure, and the nation has lost the respect of the international community by miring itself in an unnecessary and immoral war.
Without even attempting to understand the fears and misconceptions that breed terrorism, how can we hope to combat it effectively or achieve a lasting peace?
Posted by: James | May 18, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Reagan never sat down with terrorists? Hmmm, didn’t he arm the contras? What were they? Hmmm, didn’t he sell weapons to Iran (to arm the contras). I guess Iran wasn’t our enemy then (even though they had attacked our embassy just before his presidency). Hmmm, didn’t he arm the mujahaddin in Afghanistan (now known as the Taliban)? Why do I bother? Its pointless talking to people who have their heads up Fox News.
Posted by: mom2eand3 | May 18, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Senator Obama has not said that he would hold talks with leaders without preparation. He has always insisted that there be ground work and an agenda that made it clear what issues would be under discussion including issues of human rights and others depending upon the country involved. What Senator Obama opposes is setting preconditions that amount to negotiators agreeing to our demands before negotiations even begin. For John McCain to continue to insist that Senator Obama’s position is to hold talks without preparation is simply dishonest. The “straight talk express” has had a couple of tires blow out.
Posted by: clw743 | May 18, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Virginia
“Obama’s pathetic knowledge of past talks between nations, is truly frightening. Kennedy and Reagan OPENED TALKS WITH nations thru proper channels, NOT MERELY TALKS AT, WITHOUT CERTAINTY THAT THERE WAS AN AGENDA AND A BASIS FOR DISCUSSION. Wild accusations are equally dangerous, and foment even more distrust. Who is advising Obama, and what are their credentials? I speak as someone who studied International Relations on the graduate level at Tufts University!!!”
Well I never studied international relations and I think you are full of crap. How is the situation between the US and Iran now, and the US and Russia/China in the past so substantively different as to not just preclude diplomacy, but to actually make it “frightening” and “dangerous”? You may not like Achmedinejad or Khameini but they are the legitimate government of that country, and there is nothing “improper” about talking to them. The US and Iran share so many common interests in the area, both economic and political, that it is absurd to even suggest there is no basis for discussion. To top it all off, the only ones making wild accusations and fomenting distrust are those who are saying war is the only solution. It is a valid question to ask who is advising Obama, McCain apparently is being advised by every lobbyist for foreign dictators and arms dealers that he can fit in his rolodex.
I guess my fundamental thesis is that not only are you stupid on every level, but you can barely compose a sentence. You did not study international relations. You cannot possibly have gone to graduate school.
Posted by: Linus Bern | May 18, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Thankfully the British (Conservative) government didn’t baulk at opening discussions with the IRA. Thankfully the British (Labour) government continued talking, till the peace process delivered.
Now I know that you US purists bankrolled the terrorist organisation that was the IRA till the day after 9/11, but that shouldn’t blind you to the virtues of “jaw-jaw rather than war-war”, as W.S.Churchill put it.
Posted by: londonwelsh | May 18, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
People look at the names of these anti Obama commenters. These are paid blog commenters. Debbie, Melanie, Jo,Tommy, Rob, Jim, Jeff, Mike, Randy, Janette, Shawna, Donna,Susan, Sue, Debrah, Ashley, John, Frank, Todd. Pick a bland American sounding given name, and then post some quickly thought up blather designed to smear, Call yourself a Democrat and threaten to vote for McCain. This is pure viscious disinformation and propaganda at its worst.
Read most of these posts and they sound like they are coming from the same person or written off a formula sheet.
Judging from the choice of names and spelling I could guess at which country recruited or is paying them.
Posted by: mossydog | May 18, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Hey Questioner, knock off the Dallas insults.
Obama kicked rear here in the primaries. He carried Dallas County and Collin County (in the suburbs) by 30% or so.
We are not all as challenged as Jo, who probably accepts 100,000 years of war as long as he doesn’t have to fight in it.
Posted by: Mom2EandE | May 18, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
You know what would actually be interesting? If you people took the time to actually read and think about the facts and what these candidates were saying instead of bringing your pre-packaged Wal-Mart mentalities to these discussions. People who embrace the idea that might is right in the modern world we live in deserve to lose their liberties, livelihood and children to the bloodshed their ignorance perptuates. None of you are any better than the Islamic fundamentalist suicide bomber who has been duped into blowing him or herself up for their beliefs. Anyhow, if there was a god, that god would tell you that you can’t bomb the world into peace. All of it is up to us.
Posted by: teb | May 18, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Using past examples of diplomacy in the Reagan, Kennedy, etc. administrations to discuss Obama’s position on foreign policy is a far better historical analogy than Bush’s appeasement analogy.
I fail to see how some people can decide that Obama will destroy America. It’s already in pretty horrible shape, thanks to the abandonment of the Constitution by the present administration, an abandonment of good sense in including the dangerous imperialist objectives of the neocons by the present administration, and a failure to feel accountable to We the People of the United States of America.
We have had the best military in the world for decades. We have the best weapons in the world. The world knows this, and yet, other countries such as Iran don’t seem to be cowering (probably because we’re tied up in the stupidity of our occupation of Iraq). Perhaps using a combination of our strengths (military/weaponry) plus diplomacy will yield better results than we’ve been seeing. Of course, diplomacy should always ALWAYS come first. Or there’s blood on our hands.
P.S. whoever said that Black Liberation theology is the same as Black Panther theology needs to read a few books on the subject.
Posted by: Colleen | May 18, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Effective communication is a basic and essential key to the betterment of any relationship, even if that relationship is with an enemy.
Why are so many of you so afraid of talking to those that don’t like you. Many of you seem to be PROGRAMED to attack first without even thinking about engaging in talks in an attempt to solve a problem before blood is shed. Al of you are complaining about Obama wanting to talk things out. My question to you all is how many of you have held a dying soldier in your arms and wondered if things could have been different if our elected officials had taken the time to talk before statring this blunder of a war that I am serving our country in iraq in right now. I would really like for one of you intelligent individuals to answer this question for me….
if you had a son or daughter serving PROUDLY in the military, would you want a President who is open to talking to our enemies and trying to work out differences before resorting to combat….OR…… woud you rather have a President who places your child in harms way immediately without taking the opportunity to open channels to commnicate EFFECTIVELY with our enemies.
As i sit her in Iraq and read some of these blogs it makes me ashamed to be fighting for your rights to spew such closed minded hatred toward each other.
Communication is key to any relationship even if that relationship envolves your enemy.
Posted by: Tyrone | May 18, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
The GOP eat their young.
Newt Gangrene-itch! accused Reagan of appeasement when he met Gorby.
Bring out the boogeyman of talking to your foreign enemies to scare dumb potential GOP voters back home and take their focus off of the horrible way you’ve destroyed the economy.
Bush and McCain were wanred of the 9/11 threats..and guess what…THEY STILL HAPPENED!
For eight years Bush has ignored Iran…guess what…they are stronger today. McCain says he’ll chase OBL to the gates of hell…hahaha WHEN??????
Forget this Kumbaya crap you neocons are trying to serve up. Obama is talking about facing the issues head on.
Posted by: Willy | May 18, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Afriad to communicate! maybe that is the problem that we continue to pass on to our children. Son/Daughter is bad to communicate with those that don’t share your views. Ignore those that don’t disagree with you. Fight them without trying to figure out why they dislike you. Kill them without taking the chance to understand if there is a possibility that the two of you can meet on common ground. Kill Kill Kill (DON’T COMMUNICATE) (DON’T TALK)
Maybe that’s why our children are losing their minds today and shooting each other up in schools. Maybe because we as adults are teaching them that the only acceptible form of communication is violence.
Effective COMMUNICATIONS is important in every relationship. even if that relationship involves an enemy.
Stop being afraid to talk. Even if you sit down and talk to someone doesn’t mean that you have to give them anything. it just means that you gave it a chance. If things don’t work out them we still reserve the option to fight and protect/defend ourselves.
So, I would think that it is only HUMANE and shows good LEADERSHIP to sit down and talk first before one resorts to killing.
Posted by: Army Officer Ty | May 18, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
If the Americans go to vote for Obama, it seems that the situation (in America) is really bad.
Posted by: Nicolas De Vins | May 18, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
A wise man once said “Insanity is doing the same thin expecting a different result”. That man was Albert Einstein. Listen i am not from the school of 1 track mindedness. I believe we should use all of our assets military and negotiative diplomacy. Bush tried it his way and he got it wrong, wrong wrong!!! Again, the facts are indisputable. You cant argue the significance of Iran’s powere through Bush’s horrible foreign diplomacy. That’s tangible because we have seen this practice put into play and it doesnt work. It is time to try a different approach. I read something earlier about the inevitability of other nations acquiring nuclear technology and we should just accept that as their right. I respectfull disagree because nuclear weapons in the wrong hands threatens our existance. That is not an option and Obama doesnt feel its an option either. He simply has a different view than John Wayne Bush. His view isnt a radical one and it isnt a great idea he came up with . It is a view that was shared by many good presidents that has been celebrated through American history. It appears that we want to rewite history. Everyone is so worried about lining up with the current Repub ideas or Demo ideas so u can fall in line with the party. The fact of the matter is, is there is no silver bullet in foreign policy. There is no one size fit all strategy in foreign policy. Anyone narrow minded enough to believe u can continue on the same path without progress is a fool. I am not married to 1 particular idea or strategy. I am a thinkin man and I know u must be forever changing and growing to address issues we face in the 21st century. It is crazy to suggest we do things 1 way.
Posted by: Reality | May 18, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Nicolas de Vins,
What are you basing this assumption off of? Why do you believe that a vote for Obama mean that the situation in America is bad?
Posted by: Army Officer Ty | May 18, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Americans have been so duped that the world is watching in absolute shock. It is un-fathomable to think that there is this major ‘debate’ as to whether there should be talks which could lead toward more peaceful conditions in our world. You can’t even set pre-conditions unless you talk to the adversaries to tell them what the pre-conditions are! HELLO !!!!! Anyone against talks are lost sheep…..and dangerous for America !
Posted by: Greg Jones | May 18, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Reality,
Well said. You are absolutely right in that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result is crazy.
Obama’s plan on foreign policy may no be perfect but it darn well is a step in the right direction. If we cannot EVOLVE to the point where we try to sit down like ADULTS and COMMUNICATE our DIFFERENCES then we all are in for a rude awakening one day really soon.
Posted by: Army Officer Ty | May 18, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
LadyAtty
“Conduct talks with governments that are recognized by the UN. Conduct well-planned peace talks with any recognized government when it is prudent. NEVER conduct talks with terrorists. They are NOT a country nor recognized by the UN. Therein lies the difference, folks.”
———-
This is just so completely wrong that it is ridiculous. Iran IS a country. Iran IS recognized by the UN. In fact Achmedinejad was elected DEMOCRATICALLY in an election monitored and certified by the United Nations. That is more than can be said for Pakistan or Saudi Arabia. It is diffficult for foreigners to be sympathetic to Americans when so many of you wish to flaunt your willful ignorance.
Posted by: EmbarrassedForYou | May 18, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Mr. Obama – who is he?
Born to two very poor people.
- went to Oxidental College in California
- transfered to Columbia University – graduated
- graduated from Harvard University
Poor guy from a biracial family – I find it hard to believe he is a racist – I guess he would have to hate the mother that carried him for 9 mos.
Now that we have the facts – lets get real patroitism is about work. Someone who is willing to make less to give more. Someone who is willing to work with the poorest people in the nation not because it is the politically safe thing to do, but because his mother always taught him to treat people with kindness and the way that he would like to be treated. She taught him honesty, good judgment, straight talk and fairness. Mr. Obama is smart, on every issue he has gotten it right – he suggested when he got in the race to go after the terrorist in Pakistan & Afghanistan – when President Bush recently went after the terrorist we were able to kill one of the men who was 2nd in charge. Barack Obama got it right. When he was against the holiday gas tax – all of the economist stated that he was right,it would cause gas prices to go higher.
We have a President right now who operates as if he is play GI joe with his childhood friend these are real issues real problems and we need a man who is not afraid, who has it right – General Colin Powell and Senator Jim Webb and Secretary Gates all say that we need to sit down with Iran and other enemies. Barack Obama has always stated that with preparation not with pre-conditions.
We need to grow up – it is a new day – America will elevate itself with a biracial President because he will be able to understand both perspectives without dimenishing any group. We need to heal and if we don’t begin to accept the fact that we can have a President that may not be the color we want, the gender we want, the political party we want but someone who is willing to protect this nation, we will all be better off. If we don’t unite, the terrorist won’t have to invade us we will eliminate ourselves. Americans it is our choice. Every nationality fight for this nation and to suggest that someone skin color makes them unpatriotic is almost as bad as what happened to black americans who fought for this nation in WWI and WWII and was mistreated when they came home. Folks give it a rest. We are one country, one nation and we are Americans. We need to love each other, it does us no good to fight internally. Remember the terrorist can read to. Barack Obama is a good man, he will never act in the manner that you want because he has a passion for getting things done not someone who runs around making promises to everyone. Let him work hard as he has always done and I believe you will be pleased with the results. We need a President that is not afraid to go into the roughest communities in this nation.
We have a guy who will fight for this country surround himself with the best and the brightest – General Powell and oothers who love this nation and will do everything it takes to protect it. I trust him because I believe that he, like many of us, are just tired of us playing politics – lets take action so that we can get things done. Stop the fighting – this is not about I want my party to look better than yours so I’m willing to do anything to undermine the othe group – that will not work and we will lose. We will lose and the terrorist will win. I want a strong nation and Barack like many black people before him will work hard because he will have to do better, be smarter and have the best people at his side because he would never get away with the junk that a George Bush has gotten away with. Barack understands this loud and clear.
“Change we Can Believe In”
I want a President who is willing to ACT Smart and Be Tough, Not act Dumb and Weak!!
Fay::
Posted by: Fay | May 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
PGHPAVOTER :
There are things out there called books, and a simple skill called research that would do wonders for you if you want to actually be though tof as relevant to the discussions at hand. I have been reading your posts and see STRAIGHT THROUGH your garbage. Thank God that WV,KY and PA – yes PA where you’re from – does not represent the majority of the US. FYI, racism, sexim nor ignorace is an admirable trait, and you seem to be a blend of the three,I pity you. It appears from your posts, that you cant help it, but lets see if I can share something with you about your undercover fetish for Muslims as it relates to the Presidency.
If you were an actual patriot with any real concern for the country, and your head did more than just sport a hairstlyle you would have known that Article VI of the Constitution clearly states “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
If you werent too busy being mezmerized with Islam and Muslims, Bush, McCain, Clintons, Obama, and all that stupid nonsense that passes as relevance you would have noticed this.
I am sick of these bigotries masquerading as credible information on which to determine who runs this country. This is how we ended up with this Iraq mess we are in now. If you really are as concerned about the future of this country and not just having a forum to spew empty-headed talking points you heard on MSM or borrowed from some idiot claiming to have knowledge, here is a clue – do some research before yapping. Better to be quiet and be thought a fool than open your trap and be proven to be one.
Posted by: Kevin California | May 18, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
You can’t be strong abroad if you are not strong at home.
The federal debt has gone from 6 to 9.5 trillion under Bush and McSame’s budgets will only make it bigger.
The GOP are trying to scare the electorate just as they did in the 2004 race. Don’t buy into it again.
We’ve become the biggest debtors in the world. We borrow from China to spend on wars in Iraq and to buy Saudi oil. Bush said he’d develop a energy policy making us less dependent yet he goes begging for the Saudis to increase production.
Posted by: Byron | May 18, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
You guys all sound like a bunch of children.
Posted by: Binary Star | May 18, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Embarressed for you,
Great post. and as you hinted a in your post. If we don’t come together terrorist won’t have to attack us because we we EAT OURSELVES ALIVE. Sucks to say but absolutely true.
Posted by: Army Officer Ty | May 18, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Thank-you Tom in MA and Nicolas De Vins. We have several other voices of reason here. Yet, many seem extremely perplexed by why our future President would want to talk with our enemies? I just have one question that might focus all this argument. What other choice would you advise? We, obviously, can’t use a military solution for every disagreement. We can’t even use international sanctions without discussing. As I used to say to my children and students, it is not fair to hold something against someone else without them getting a chance to redeem themselves and/or explain themselves. They just might have legitimate reasons unbeknownst to us! OR they may have CRAZY reasoning, but we need to know that too, in order to know what we are dealing with. Senator Obama said his discussions would NOT be without preparations and as many mentioned here talks don’t mean appeasement. Chamberlain had talks but made the wrong judgment about Hitler’s character. Churchill would never had made that mistake!
Posted by: Grace Needed | May 18, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Obama never implies he would approach the Iranians and other enemies in a platform different than past presidents have done… you have to be very careful how you read what the current regime in office is telling you… they imply that our enemies are somehow more dangerous than anything we’ve seen before… the Russians were pretty dangerous during the cold war, but back then our presidents didn’t try to scare the pants off of us… Obama suggests we return to the way we used to do diplomacy that actually worked… what Bush and McCain can’t grasp is that what they are doing keeps making things worse.
Posted by: origood | May 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
What’s really sad is….
**** We have brave young men and women who have enough courage to face the possibility of bing killed in Iraq right now (I know because I have lead some of them and witnessed their courage) yet many of you are sitting safe at home and afraid to talk to our enemies before you place these young men in women in the situation to give their lives honorably defending your rights.
Posted by: Army Officer Ty | May 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Any democratic woman who “claims” to be a supporter of Hillary will never vote for McCain in November. The Supreme Court will probably be in play in the next President’s term. Knowing that McCain will appoint Alito/Roberts type jurists which would have a potential 7-2 vote to overturn Roe v Wade will cause women who believe in feminist social values to come back in November.
Posted by: marjory | May 18, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Obama does seem to have the perfect opening, now that Bush fils is railing against everyone who ever suggested negotiating with terrorists or radicals in the Middle East to make a devastating point: “uh, you mean like your dad?” It was under the auspices of Bush pere that the Israelis and PLO started negotiating, at the Madrid conference, with the help of his secretary of state, James Baker, who recently wrote in the Iraq Study Group report that negotiating with enemies in the Middle East is crucial to putting U.S. foreign policy back on track:
“Dealing with Iran and Syria is controversial. Nevertheless, it is our view that in diplomacy, a nation can and should engage its adversaries and enemies to try to resolve conflicts and differences consistent with its own interests. Accordingly, the [U.S. and Iraq] should actively engage Iran and Syria in its diplomatic dialogue, without preconditions.
… There must be a renewed and sustained commitment by the United States to a comprehensive Arab-Israeli peace on all fronts: Lebanon, Syria, and President Bush’s June 2002 commitment to a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. This commitment must include direct talks with, by, and between Israel, Lebanon, Palestinians (those who accept Israel’s right to exist), and particularly Syria …
The only lasting and secure peace will be a negotiated peace such as Israel has achieved with Egypt and Jordan.”
Posted by: rmackey | May 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Willy & Ty,
I agree with both of you – we have got to work in the best interest of our nation and if we keep teaching our children to be angry and kill, kill, kill we will continue to have innercity violence and Columbines all around this nation.
We must be willing to talk to our enemies if we want to be able to resolve issues.
President Obama will be a real man – if you looked at the way he ran his campaign without having to go negative he has kept a strong unit of people who are willing to work together, he has not gone into debt and he has paid all of his bills. Don’t we want a President who will get us out of debt, set a clear agenda and have competent people to accomplish the task. This guy has done this through honesty and fairness and respect.
Business Owners believe that the way Senator Obama has run his campaign can be used in college as a “business case study” because he has run it so well, his management skills are superb. Let’s make sure that we have this type of President running our government.
Change we can believe in.
Fay
Posted by: Fay | May 18, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
You’re the only one claiming he is the Messiah.
Posted by: EmbarrassedForYou | May 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Pres Reagan dealt with the Iranians and made a deal to sell Tow and Hawk missiles to Iran (in excahnge for hostages in Leb) They also had close relations with the Baathists in Iraq and provide support for the war against Iran started by Hussien.
Posted by: DC | May 18, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
…..and your punctuation sucks….
Posted by: londonwelsh | May 18, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Serge – all of the names given to Senator Obama – are done to fatten someone’s bank account. The media and others know what they are doing. Some americans have never had any shame, that is why we cannot find billions of dollars lost in Iraq – that is why contractors overcharge the american tax payers and those of you who have decided to be reckless by calling Barack “The Messiah” are only falling into the same trap. That is why the middle class is going into bankruptcy you have VOTED against your interest. Dr. King – says, “Hate is too great a burden to bear.” Keep doing what you are doing and baby you will be eliminated. Your hate will kill you sooner or later. God loves a cheerful giver and that includes love. If you want this nation to be great again – you better learn to love your neighbor!! Oh by the way that is also Biblical.
Change We Can Believe In!
Fay::::
Posted by: Fay | May 18, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
To those of you say Obama should not speak to our enemies because all he wants to do is hold hands and serve them tea, PLEASE grow up or show me the documentation where Obama makes those claims.
You’re clearly obsessed with this republican narrative that Obama is trying to play the part of a guidance counselor with Iran and others.
If you read and listen to what he says, he talks about “tough” diplomacy BUT diplomacy none the less. That is something has been lacking for some time. Take your blinders off for once and open your eyes.
Posted by: Estevan Carlos Benson | May 18, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
The two accomplishments wronfully credited to John Kennedy was the Cuban missile crisis and the lowering of the price of steel .
The credit should be given to Nikita Khrushchev for refusing to be bull headed and prevented Kennedy from blowing the entire World and for the steel industry leaders for agreeing to lower the price of steel .
Kennedy lighted the fuse that started the foolhardy Viet-Nam war . Made another stupid blunder with the Bay of Pig .
And in 1963, backed a coup against the government of Iraq .
Yes, Obama is not and will not be a Kennedy………..
Posted by: Andre A | May 18, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
All you folks being so critical of Obama attempts to talke to IRAN and the other foreign coutries are just scared he will be able to bring piece like we once had…Oh no!! not a Black man…this cannot be….
Posted by: Kano | May 18, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Obama is not naive to think that just talking is the key but it has been effective in the past with other administrations so why couldn’t it be with his? Do you people want another military conflict? We have lost too many american lives already. If diplomatic talks is an option to avoid war and other conflicts then why not try it? McCain is on record as supporting Powell with talking to Syria when Gingrich was against it. This administration is talking with Iran, is currently sending food to North Korea in a diplomatic attempt to foster a better relationship, and Bush sent Biden to Lybia. My point is this Virgina and Melanie, Obama is not suggesting some dangerous idea. His talks with these nations is understood to include lower level diplomacy before he actually meets with them. He is also not trying to be Kennedy or Regan or Nixon, he admired their stance on talking to the enemies of this nation. Look, if you are looking for a reason not to vote for this man then just don’t. Vote for McCain who has lied and flip/flopped all over the place. The republican party has not been a party of all people just a select few. I was an African american republican out of tradition from my parents but I have switched to the democrats because the republican party in my eyes has not done enough to reach out beyond political party lines or race. We need change. This administration has had 8 years to get things right and they have not. Yes, terrorism is real but so is my mortgage payment, gas bill, grocery bill, college tuition. There has to be balance not just war, war, war.
Posted by: Angela | May 18, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Obama is not naive to think that just talking is the key but it has been effective in the past with other administrations so why couldn’t it be with his? Do you people want another military conflict? We have lost too many american lives already. If diplomatic talks is an option to avoid war and other conflicts then why not try it? McCain is on record as supporting Powell with talking to Syria when Gingrich was against it. This administration is talking with Iran, is currently sending food to North Korea in a diplomatic attempt to foster a better relationship, and Bush sent Biden to Lybia. My point is this Virgina and Melanie, Obama is not suggesting some dangerous idea. His talks with these nations is understood to include lower level diplomacy before he actually meets with them. He is also not trying to be Kennedy or Regan or Nixon, he admired their stance on talking to the enemies of this nation. Look, if you are looking for a reason not to vote for this man then just don’t. Vote for McCain who has lied and flip/flopped all over the place. The republican party has not been a party of all people just a select few. I was an African american republican out of tradition from my parents but I have switched to the democrats because the republican party in my eyes has not done enough to reach out beyond political party lines or race. We need change. This administration has had 8 years to get things right and they have not. Yes, terrorism is real but so is my mortgage payment, gas bill, grocery bill, college tuition. There has to be balance not just war, war, war.
Posted by: Angela | May 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
It’s time for Americans to show the Radical Right that we are sick of their tough-talking cowboy antics. Their version of diplomacy has gotten us into a miserable occupation that McCain says will last another five (or was it a hundred?) years. We Americans know that the world is not simple black and white, and it’s time to elect a President who has the intelligence to know that pointing a gun barrel or dropping bombs is not the ONLY way to solve problems.
Posted by: sean | May 18, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
One need only read the posts of the Virginias, Melanies, Debbies, therockofages,the Robins and the Norms today to realize just many sick and bitter people there are in this country. And let’s not forget a good measure of racism as well.
Posted by: Jim Michie | May 18, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
May I just remind people that in the 1990′s the Clinton administration started the Gulf War to protect Iran, as well as other countries in the region from Saddam Hussein’s ambitions to invade.
Also, as reported in the Washingotn Post, Former President BILL CLINTON said in SEPTEMBER 2006, that the USA should try talking to Iran about its nuclear weapons ambitions without imposing a lot of conditions.
Bill Clinton said this: “The United States should not be afraid to talk to anyone. They should not be reluctant and shouldn’t have too many conditions,” said Clinton, who said his own offer to meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s predecessor had been rebuffed.
In an interview broadcasted on National Public Radio, BILL CLINTON said this: ” … I still believe that, based on all my Iranian friends in America, what they say is that the vast majority of Iranian citizens want to have good relationships with the United States and the West and do not want to be at odds.”
Posted by: sara | May 18, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
McCain WILL BE 72 YEARS OLD THIS SUMMER , HE HAS A BAD TEMPER AND HE HAS MAJOR HEALTH ISSUES. HE IS TOO OLD TO TRAVEL AROUND ALL OVER THE WORLD.
EVEN OLD PEOPLE SAY HE IS TOO OLD TO BE THE PRESIDENT. ELECTING HIM WOULD WEAKEN US IN THE EYES OF OUR ENEMIES.
HE CLAIMS HE IS NOT TIED TO SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS BUT HIS STAFF IS, ALL OF THEM ARE QUITING OR GETTING FIRED. VERY INTERESTING. IS THIS HOW HE WOULD RUN THE WHITE HOUSE????
OBAMA 08
Posted by: dannyboy | May 18, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
‘Obama called the dust-up “appealing,” after Bush said in Israel at the Knesset that it was a mistake to talk about diplomacy with “terrorists and radicals.”‘
appealing: pleasant
appalling: inspiring horror, dismay, or disgust
Might want to splurge on a proofreader.
Posted by: JJ | May 18, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
I think that perhaps the reason that we do not want to talk to our ideological adversaries , must be psychological in nature .
It remind me of the child who refuses to eat a new food , claiming not to like it , despite the fact that he never ate it before .
We should have someone like Dr Phil as the president’s adviser .
Perhaps we should expand our intellectual horizon and ask ourselves : ” What would Canadians or Mexicans or a….(feel in the blank) , will do , if they were in our shoes ? “
Posted by: Andre A | May 18, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Hillary supporters will rise above. They are democrats after all. 28% of Americans who still support the idiot in the oval office should not be engaged in civil conversation. After what they’ve done to the country they proclaim to love so dearly, they deserve nothing but scorn. Attacking diplomacy and then using the violence in Iraq to make their point is about the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. How do you even find the nerve?
Posted by: Julie | May 18, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Some of these racist whites pretend they are not voting for Obama because he is too young or evil-not all but some. They probably haven’t listened to a word he has said. I think it is their just deserts that they will have to pick Mccain over him. These people think we still living in a white world–Were the west had the ultimate influence. So does Bush, that is why our foreign policy is self destructive.
Posted by: Tom | May 18, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
David – do not call Barack an idiot – someone who is a graduate of Harvard who earned his degree, by the way it wasn’t paid for by his dad – he was dead and could not afford it anyway. You may not like Barack – but the Republicans want to run against the Clintons – don’t forget – Barack is a strategist and the Republicans are not ready for a strong, competent Man who has the skills of an intellectual and the finese of an athelet. Plus they have never had to run against a Man like Barack Obama. Besides, everything that I have watch is showing something greater than man. You can get angry but you are not larger than the creator. Maybe He is also tired of lying politicians who think they know everything and dumb down the public. We need someone who is not afraid of losing. someone who will speak straight with the people. He could have run this campaign very differently – he could have attacked Senator Clinton – but he had faith in the public – now maybe you are not worth believing in but he knows that there are a lot of people who are tired of scare tactics, hate mongers, racists and biggots and want to see the american people work for their best interest. He trust us to get it done.
I appreciate a president that respects the people.
Change we can believe in.
Fay
Posted by: Fay | May 18, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
I guess all the Bushies out there would like it better if Senator Obama just gave the Iranians US weapons the way Reagan did.
“IRAN CONTRA”…say it with me…”IRAN CONTRA!”
Posted by: boboday555 | May 18, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Does LynnS realize that the Iraqis or the Iranians did not attack us?
Did anyone ever say that Obama would engage in talks with an enemy and not go through the proper channels?
Do all Tufts graduate students make inane comments without first gathering all the facts?
Posted by: workingman | May 18, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
It is time for us to shed that “old post-1945 American way of thinking” and begin to become a “New American” in a New America of the twenty-first century.
We should start to think fresh in global terms , not in the same old parochial way we have been doing until now .
Posted by: Andre A | May 18, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
I just love the fact that Obama can’t get enough pledged delegates to get to 2009( neither can Hillary) so we end up with party Hacks picking our guy or gal
According to the Obama supporters bad for the hacks to pick Hillary Good for the hacks to pick their guy. Also if any of the Delegates are seated from Florida or Michigan the count according to the Rules of the party ( remember the Obama folks are always talking about the rules when it came to these two states) the number goes up from 2009 to as high as 2209 which would still leave us with the Hacks picking the winner
Posted by: nick1936 | May 18, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
McSame, both of them should fear direct talks. Evil leaders can sense weakness so they should get them to agree to all conditions first so they do not screw up the negotiations. Then they can go over there once more capible people do the actual negotiations, and rubber stamp the whole thing. When you have a strong leader like Obama there is no need to fear negotiating with Iran or Korea. They will sense his strength and show him the respect they would not show a Bush or a McCain.
Posted by: Tjustsaying | May 18, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
How can Obama be the “change” candidate when most of the major political figures in the democratic party, are behind him? I think that with how vindictive the clintons are, after everybody so easily turned their backs on them, they will bring about the most change. Besides, I have heard obama speak twice, less than a week after he announced he was running and right before the nevada caucus. Abosolutely nothing was said in either speech. Just like in 2006 when the Democrats promised everybody that if we voted for them all of these “changes” would happen. Well, the Iraq war is now their war, since they promised to get out of it, and they have not. John McCain in 2008.
Posted by: F | May 18, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
How can Obama be the “change” candidate when most of the major political figures in the democratic party, are behind him? I think that with how vindictive the clintons are, after everybody so easily turned their backs on them, they will bring about the most change. Besides, I have heard obama speak twice, less than a week after he announced he was running and right before the nevada caucus. Abosolutely nothing was said in either speech. Just like in 2006 when the Democrats promised everybody that if we voted for them all of these “changes” would happen. Well, the Iraq war is now their war, since they promised to get out of it, and they have not. John McCain in 2008.
Posted by: Frank | May 18, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Melanie do you remember who was having dinner at the white house the night before Sept 11 2001? Then got to fly back home while we were left waiting in airports. And does anyone know who Bush associates with like maybe the most wanted human on earth. Then talk about flip flop what happened to Sadam’s weapons after we arrived. I remember seeing Powell showing us maps every night the summer of 2002 where these weapons were made the bunkers they were kept in then someone turned off the camera and we couldn’t find them when we got there.
Before you find fault with my candidate check yours.
Posted by: indy 4 Change | May 18, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
The republican way is going the way of Ford Pintos, Taco Vivas, butterfly collars, and RC Cola.
Has been’s.
A new America is ready. We are ready to emerge out of our Dark Ages.
Obama and Ameirca going forward.
Yes We Can.
Posted by: Andrew | May 18, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Tom
What we will get in terms of Foreign Policy with an Obama Presidency – is someone who is competent. Someone who will speak to his commanders and listen and take advice from them regarding what it will take to finish the job and redeploy to Afghanistan & Pakistan to take out the terrorist. Senator Obama will get guidance from the likes of Colin Powell and other active and retired Generals and he will evaluate the situation and make good decisions and give the Generals the right mission to succeed.
This guy has studied this issue and you bet your bottom dollar that we will come away victorious and we will get the enemy. Believe me his first priority is to make sure that we are successful. He will never speak in that language because he knows the smallness of americans. So he will pull his team together give them the mission and they will set the tactical plan to accomplish the mission.
Barack is not afraid of leading- nor is he afraid of success. He has had to fight for everything that he has. He worked on the streets of Chicago for 2 years before he began to see results, he could have quit, they were only paying him $12,000.00 a year plus a small car allowance. This guy has tenacity – he is not a pushover. You don’t know the toughness of this guy because he does not run around trying to impress people and you want to make him into your image like you do all the women on the commericals – long hair swinging exposing their bodies and you decided that they are beautiful. You can’t make Barack he had to go through all of that crap when he was young. He is his own man and he will fight for what is good for this nation. He can’t be your “cut out male paper doll”. So get over it – you don’t own him – that is why he worked to make sure that the campaign all around this country is grassroots so that the people have a voice again. Now if that is difficult for you too bad – but you better look for someone who want the people involved instead of a bunch of talking heads in washington making decisions that are of no benefit to us. Remember, if we are going to change washington, we have to work as a large mass of americans. We need to let our legislators know that we want a smaller government. Believe me when the people speak, our President Barack Obama will listen. We need a President who want to empower the people again. We need a real America again.
Go Obama – We are Going to Be United.
There are a lot of apprehensive people but there are even more people who want to finally be the United States of America!! We are Ready – those who are ready can jump on the train, those who are not can grab the back of the train and those who don’t want to go can watch the train. But America it is time to move forward and United we can work for the good of this country!!!
Posted by: Fay | May 18, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
How can the Republicans basically f@#$ up stuff almost to the point of no return and then ask for another McSame chance? Do they have no shame? How do you go from a surplus to an almost 10 trillion dollar deficit in just one Presidency? That’s more then all the other Presidents combined! If I screwed up that bad I would just sent in a corner and hope no one noticed me.
Posted by: Tjustsaying | May 18, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Obama won’t even face Hillary in another debate, and I can’t say I blame him after the thumpin’ he took in PA.
Do you think facing a nut case like Ahmadinejad one-on-one is going to be easier than facing Gibson and Stephanopoulous?
Obama is weak, inexperienced, and naive. No wonder Hamas is pulling for him!
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 18, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I don’t think Senator Obama would just go talk with them without conditions. Him not stating this doesn’t mean that there wouldn’t be conditions. Of course there would be. Surely you all aren’t that stupid (are you). We need to talk to our enemies. This country and world needs diplomacy from the U.S. Now maybe you don’t like Obama, that’s okay but surely you can’t like what’s been happening for the past eight years. I would vote for my dog before I’d vote for Bush/McSame. Obama will surround himself with experienced cabinet members. And he has more experience than you think. Read his book. It sheds a lot of light into what we don’t know about him. Peace.
Posted by: Jey | May 18, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Don’t you people (MSM, pundits, McCain national socialists) read.
Obama said he would have the talks, “with preparations.”
That means, having a scope of discussions, having an agenda, having some staff exchanges before the big meeting.
The idiocy of Bushian/MCc approach to negotiating is the expectation that the other side gives in 90 percent before the negotiations take place.
That’s why they both prefer war. I just love the swagger and the stagger–but send your own kids, girls or boys, married or not, over and over. Don’t kill my childred–or the people of Iraq.
Posted by: Bob Nodbudr | May 18, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Hussein Obama is not yet nominated, and he is not electable.
Posted by: Moe | May 18, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
All you Obama haters need therapy! Racism like Alcoholism is a disease.
Posted by: Sue | May 18, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
I hope that the president of the United States use every means of diplomacy before he decides to send our men and women into harms way. It’s never the child of the President who goes to war, so when the President sends our troops into war treat those soldiers as though their your family members.
Posted by: manny Worth | May 18, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
I hope that the president of the United States use every means of diplomacy before he decides to send our men and women into harms way. It’s never the child of the President who goes to war, so when the President sends our troops into war treat those soldiers as though their your family members.
Posted by: manny Worth | May 18, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Yes. I am the only one that claims. Obama is the Messiah. All the problems of America will be solved. The problems of: the immigration, the issue of the race, the issue of the Hispanics, the issue of the blacks, the issue of the Asians, the decrease of the white man in America, the economy, the hostility in the world, the status of America in the world, the crime, the health, the fall of education, the demographic suicide of the white man in America. Obama is the man. We, the white man, finally, found the salvation. Please, please hurry, we could not wait anymore.
Posted by: Serge Seidlitz | May 18, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Talking to someone is no guarantee that you will get along and there won’t be a fight. However, refusing to talk to someone is most definitely a guarantee that there will be a fight.
Now, do Americans want a fight? They don’t come cheap – they cost money and lives. American money and American lives, not to mention the other side.
Unless of course, all your friends are making money off the war. Like W’s grandpappy made money from WWII, from the blood of the jews. And of course like W’s freinds made money off Iraq.
I think a law should be passed that all wars should be sibject to referendum, and all who vote yes should foot the bill in terms of money and bodies.
Never happen of course, so next best thing, get a leader who doesn’t war for wars sake.
Of course, racist idiots like some of the posters here are too blinded by hate to let even self-interest get in the way…
Posted by: johnny | May 18, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
“I think the question of the moment is: What will we have to show for 8 years of Obama foreign policy?”
Posted by: Tom in MA | May 17, 2008 7:39:22 PM
Has to be better than the last 8 years, Tom…
Posted by: ShowMe | May 18, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Seeing the way the Obama’ supporters attack everyone is sad. It has divided the party so that most people are ashamed to be called Democrats. If you don’t agree with Obama, you are called a racist, stupid, an idiot, member of the KKK, mentally ill, old, etc.
I and many other reasonable Americans will vote for the best candidate in November—irregardless of Party Affiliations, race, gender, age, etc. This is called voting as a responsible and mature adult who cares about their county and children’s future!!
Posted by: Debbie | May 18, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
“Seeing the way the Obama’ supporters attack everyone is sad”
What, like calling black people “nigs”?
Yeah, that is sad
Oh wait, those weren’t Obama supporters?
I think someone has their blinders on, probably on purpose.
Posted by: johnny | May 18, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
After reading so many hateful, ignorant entries here, I conclude America deserves its leader.
Enjoyed great, intelligent posts by some Europeans who see America as it is.
Posted by: florian | May 18, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
“I and many other reasonable Americans will vote for the best candidate in November—irregardless of Party Affiliations, race, gender, age, etc.”
Long as he’s an old white guy who wants to blow the middle east to kingdom come, no matter what?
Posted by: johnny | May 18, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
I’ve read thru almost all of the previous comments, and I have to say, WORST THREAD EVER!!
My fear now is that I may never be able to recover the ten or so IQ points I lost just thru osmosing all the crap.
For starters: Kenya is NOT BLACK!
And it’s obvious that a lot of the negative, “I will vote for MCCain if Hillary isn’t the nominee” folks are just full of it. I don’t think any of you are even remotely Hillary supporters.
UGH! I just hope I can wash off the slime from this thread!
If you aren’t, then hope you still have your house, a job and your military aged children with you after John McCain’s 4 years is up.
Posted by: Barry (da Bronx) | May 18, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Gas $4 a gl and rising, Tuition skyrocketing, mortgage crisis, health crisis, America now lost the trust and admiration by most of the world etc etc etc…
We Can Change
YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: chronic | May 18, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Gas $4 a gl and rising, Tuition skyrocketing, mortgage crisis, health crisis, America now lost the trust and admiration by most of the world etc etc etc…
We Can Change
YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: chronic | May 18, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
I’ve read thru almost all of the previous comments, and I have to say, WORST THREAD EVER!!
My fear now is that I may never be able to recover the ten or so IQ points I lost just thru osmosing all the crap.
For starters: Kenya is NOT BLACK!
And it’s obvious that a lot of the negative, “I will vote for MCCain if Hillary isn’t the nominee” folks are just full of it. I don’t think any of you are even remotely Hillary supporters.
UGH! I just hope I can wash off the slime from this thread!
If you aren’t, then hope you still have your house, a job and your military aged children with you after John McCain’s 4 years is up.
Posted by: Barry (da Bronx) | May 18, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Hmm, someone please explain how Obama is racist? If so, it must be the white part of his being, correct? I guess, so, because as a person of color, he is not in a position to be a “racist”…idiots!
Posted by: rich | May 18, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I am sick and tired of Bush. The only reason he said those remarks was to stir up controversy and get attention. Lately, no one has paid GWB any attention. All attention is on the candidates. Bringing our campaign criticisms to a foreign nation was just plain dangerous. It does not show us as being united. If anyone is making us look weak it’s GWB. This is the kind of presidency that McCain votes with and stands behind. Senator Obama will bring legitimacy once again to the Presidency.
Posted by: Lana Castillo | May 18, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
I am sick and tired of Bush. The only reason he said those remarks was to stir up controversy and get attention. Lately, no one has paid GWB any attention. All attention is on the candidates. Bringing our campaign criticisms to a foreign nation was just plain dangerous. It does not show us as being united. If anyone is making us look weak it’s GWB. This is the kind of presidency that McCain votes with and stands behind. Senator Obama will bring legitimacy once again to the Presidency.
Posted by: Lana Castillo | May 18, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
I think Democrats must come together to save the nation from McSame. Why would you put someone in the Presidency that is likely to appoint judges that could overturn Roe v.s Wade?
What about someone that could roll back gains for women? If you look at the Republican ticket there is a lack of powerful women. There has never been a female Republican House Speaker. So women and those men who believe in the causes of women better think twice before voting for McBush.
I would bet cash money that McSame is not going to put a woman,black, asian, or anyone of a darker complexion on the VP ticket. If you think he will put Condi Rice on that ticket you have lost all common sense.
I know she said she is not interested in the job but there was some talk she was interested at one time. I bet what happened is someone sat her down and told her this is not the Democratic party we do not put N’s on the VP slot. You starting to get to big for your pants lady, you better be happy for the scraps Bush threw you.
Posted by: Tjustsaying | May 18, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Obama has said that he would talk to nations who were not friendly without preconditions. He has also said, however, that there would be a vast amount of preparation and an agenda agreed upon before the talks take place.
Obama is gifted with extraordinary communication skills which is one of the hallmarks of truely great leaders.
Weather of not he will be a great leader remains to be seen, but this 68 year old white woman believes that he has the mind, spirit, integrity and political skills to be a great president.
Posted by: Jubilee | May 18, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
For those of you who will not vote for Obama based on what you believe to be valid reasons, visit the link below.
Sign the petition today and forward to whomever you can.
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Dems_Who_Will_Not_Vote_For_Obama/index.html
Posted by: Mark in LA | May 18, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
John Mccain should shut his mouth there is no need for him to sound as well as look stupid.
He is not in a position to critizise anyone for weak judgment or dangerous lack of experience.He has demonstrated at best extremely weak judgement in invading a country which had nothing to do with 9/11 and a mind boggling lack of experience in not having an exit strategy.
It is because he and the republicans got rid of Saddam Hussein why Iran is stronger and their boneheaded stupidity that got Hamas elected in Gaza.
He has a cavalier and hypocritical attitude with taxpayers money wanting to giveaway $billions to the very rich people like his lobbyist buddies while leaving hard working americans(including veterans) who largely creates the wealth for this country to fend for themselves.
Posted by: Peter | May 18, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
I will not vote for someone who played the race card and labeled the Clinton’s as racists.
I will not vote for someone who played the dirtiest of dirty politics to get elected…TWICE! Read it here
http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/2008/02/lets_do_it_agai.html
Posted by: memyselfandI | May 18, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
For all those simple minded idots that are posting today why would you think that Obama would meet with our enemies just for the sake of meeting? Dont be so damned stupid! Of course there would be preconditions and much preparation, and specific goals for these talks. Whether you like Obama or not, you have to know that he is an intelligent person. But you idiots that are posting are too dumb to know that. Obama doesnt believe the rest of America is as dumb as some of the Obama haters here, so of course he hasnt gone into great details about a hypothetical meeting in a question he was asked to respond to. My God. Hate and racism are alive and well here and in West Virginia.
Posted by: Cufflynk | May 18, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
I cannot believe the comments coming from the right wing nuts. So Obama is wrong for wanting to talk to Iran. That means Secretary Rice is wrong, Defense secretary Gates is wrong, Colin Powel is wrong, Jim Baker is wrong etc etc…Right wing nuts please, you have nothing to be proud of from the past 7 years of the worst president this country has every had, so the only way you think you can win is to attack someone for common sense…Ask yourself republicans and those sitting on the fence about the Democrats, ARE YOU BETTER OFF TODAY THAN YOU WERE 7 YEARS AGO? Gas was $1.50 per gallon, food cost was low, dollar was strong, we had a surplus, housing was strong, poverty was low, job market was strong, people were confident about the direction of the country, the world had much respect for the USA, no war’s, health care was not the best but was much more affordable than today, the list is too long…..Think about it and use common sense instead of disagreeing just because someone is a democrat and have a different point of view on how we should get out of the mess BUSH and the REPUBLICAN congress got us into. Here is something to ponder, 3 special elections all LOST for the GOP..Change is coming don’t fight it or you will be left behind.
Posted by: Natural | May 18, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
They called JFK and Reagan appeasers as well.
Posted by: Brian | May 18, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Bush’s foreign policy has been a complete disaster, and now we have a McCain who wants to continue the cowboy policies that have delivered us into a postion where we are despised around the world, and wield no influence whatsoever. Repubs had 8 years and have nearly destroyed this nation…like hell I’m going to give them another 4 so that they can finish the job.
Posted by: Karen | May 18, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
being afraid to talk is a sign of weakness. it is not surprise that mc bush is adopting bush’s policies and sounding like a parrot.
Posted by: tim | May 18, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Some people here just do not get it.
Obama said not long ago, that he would meet with known terrorist leaders, without conditions. He has since revised this because he thought, hey, that didn’t sound so good.
What he said recently in response to McCain, is the SAME policy that is currently in place!
The US will meet with rogue leaders, if certain conditions are met. The reason why we have not been able to hold talks with such leaders, is because they have not agreed to those conditions.
We currently have low level diplomats who are working behind the scenes.
How is this any different than what Obama would do? Except for the fact that he DID say he would not require any conditions…what a naive and inexperienced “leader”.
End of story
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 18, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
oboma is another gore/kerry, no race issue here he’s just another democrate… say what what you want to hear,no substance and a fast talker with a nice smile.
Posted by: buzzx | May 18, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
oboma is another gore/kerry, no race issue here he’s just another democrate… say what what you want to hear,no substance and a fast talker with a nice smile.
Posted by: buzzx | May 18, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Bush’s foreign policy has been a complete disaster, and now we have a McCain who wants to continue the cowboy policies that have delivered us into a postion where we are despised around the world, and wield no influence whatsoever. Repubs had 8 years and have nearly destroyed this nation…like hell I’m going to give them another 4 so that they can finish the job.
Posted by: Karen | May 18, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Some people here just do not get it.
Obama said not long ago, that he would meet with known terrorist leaders, without conditions. He has since revised this because he thought, hey, that didn’t sound so good.
What he said recently in response to McCain, is the SAME policy that is currently in place!
The US will meet with rogue leaders, if certain conditions are met. The reason why we have not been able to hold talks with such leaders, is because they have not agreed to those conditions.
We currently have low level diplomats who are working behind the scenes.
How is this any different than what Obama would do? Except for the fact that he DID say he would not require any conditions…what a naive and inexperienced “leader”.
End of story
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 18, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Some people here just do not get it.
Obama said not long ago, that he would meet with known terrorist leaders, without conditions. He has since revised this because he thought, hey, that didn’t sound so good.
What he said recently in response to McCain, is the SAME policy that is currently in place!
The US will meet with rogue leaders, if certain conditions are met. The reason why we have not been able to hold talks with such leaders, is because they have not agreed to those conditions.
We currently have low level diplomats who are working behind the scenes.
How is this any different than what Obama would do? Except for the fact that he DID say he would not require any conditions…what a naive and inexperienced “leader”.
End of story
Posted by: Raleigh Voter | May 18, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
The venom shown here by those who profess to be Hillary Clinton supporters is truly troubling. It is my fervent hope and wish that these are really Republicans trying to create problems for the Democrats,, or even better that they all part of an organized Republican hit squad.
If I am wrong and these are really supporters of Hillary Clinton behaving in this manner then the Democratic party is in big trouble and worse than that this nation is in serious trouble.
I say this because much of what has been posted by my fellow Hillary supporters is just absolute bunkum and balderdash. One poster for example post that while Obama will need the Hillary supporters to win, Hillary will not need the Obama supporters to win. I really would suggest that that lady get off the pie and face facts. No Democrat can win if 92% of the black voters nationwide vote Republican or stay home. This reality has nothing to do with whether we like it or not. It is very simply a fact. It is a further fact that Hillary Clinton cannot win her Senate seat in my home state of NY if the black people in Downstate stay home. Another fact is that for every dirty trick we accuse Obama of against Hillary a similar one or better was used against him. That also is not about my opinion it is a fact.
I have supported Mrs Clinton through this campaign and I again say that her lost is more due to the over confidence of her staff early in this campaign.
When the Democrats have finally decided I will support the candidate who comes forward.
Simply put it makes absolutely no sense for me to cut off my nose and spoil my face just because my candidate was beaten fairly and squarely.
I do hope that none of you who are now speaking about voting for McCain out of spite find yourself having to regret that vote, but my suspicion is that some of you will if you go through with that, spiteful, childish conduct. Just remember that Healthcare, tax relief, war or peace, and much, much more depends on that decision.
An additionally word to the wise. Do not waste your time cussing me out here
Posted by: jjane | May 18, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Some of you people can not be real. How can you critize Obama for wanting to talk. Bush and McCain are a joke. We were once a superpower and now because of the policies of Bush we are a laughinstock around the world. I hope Bush and all his cronies are brought up on war crimes.
Posted by: dana | May 18, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
The republicans are unable to understand why their past winning argument of fear is not working. Perhaps some people are tired of the same story different year. This current administration has been a total failure.
Also it does not surprise me that a lot of the female Hilary supporters post the rudest comments. Women are pity and catty by nature so it with the ovaries.
Posted by: jelly450 | May 18, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
I have no use for Republicrats, including Barack Obama.
The straw man argument Obama makes about dialog might impress those who have missed most history.
Chomsky’s book, titled RETHINKING CAMELOT, has something to say about ‘shining white knight’ JFK. He was, alas, just another ‘criminal’ president of the United States. He love black ops, in which the most horrible things were done to the most innocent by states battling ‘national radicalism’ (people who would like some say in matters affecting them) and ‘terrorists’. In fact, With JFK there was a paradigm shift in the way nation states related to each other. Now the enemy was not so much some negarious foreign aggressor or alliance of foreign forces, but ‘within’. The people became the enemy and combat changed accordingly.
We haven’t looked back. We have ‘law and order’ governments everywhere we look, from which we get regulation ‘of’ the people, the “bewildered herd,” whose ignorant meddling once led to “a crisis of democracy.” Along with law and order for regular folks, namely the majority, which doesn’t actually do anything to make us safe, we have neoliberal polices for governments. In other words, They get less regulation, because that’s the way that capitalists want it. Therefore, Their partners in politics see to it that that’s what they get.
The Left doesn’t need to Rethink Obama. The phony Left certainly could stand to do so.
Posted by: Rick Battams | May 18, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
I just want to know how many of the 9’11 guys wer either iraqi and iranians. I think we are found scape goat for saudi arabia and that was sandam husein.Yet after 9’11 the only plain that wasa allowed to live the united state was one carrying the saudi royals. If you have raised kids in your life you will know that sometimes your best option to a bad kid is to talk to them and let them know the consequences of their action. Thats what we should do with Iran. I that way they know the consequencies of their actions without we appearing as bullies.
Posted by: JH | May 18, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
The new Republican mantra: “Waaaaahh, Waaaaahhhh, Waaaaahhhhh”
Posted by: Liberal Larry | May 18, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Let’s talk about Patriotism for a second
John McCain was known as “Songbird McCain” in the POW camps,by the Viet Cong AND the other POWs.
According to his Autobiography, He told the enemy more than he was suppose to BEFORE any torture.
And why did he block Any and All legislation aimed at finding any remaining POWs after the war ?
Did They Know Too Much that could damage his career ?
Posted by: Hat Morgan | May 18, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
GO SEN. OBAMA – YOU ARE DOING EVERYTHING RIGHT – YOU HAVE THE “RIGHT WINGS” & “GOP” REAL WORRIED – THEY ARE EMBARASSED WITH THEIR “HOT AIR” ! STAY FOCUS! COME ON DEMOCRATS LET US UNITE AND EXECUTE CHANGED FOR THIS GREAT LAND AND PEOPLE – THE U.S.A. – LET US TAKE BACK THE GLOBAL LEADERSHIP AND CHALLANGES – FOLKS, SERIOUSLY, LOOK AT SEN. OBAMA’S SUPPORT ;from – JULIE NIXON, THE KENEDY, BILL RICHARDSON AND OVER 200 SUPERDELEGATES, THE POPULAR VOTES, ++++++++++++++++COME HOME ARCHIE BUNKER WE HAVE A JOB TO DO, GEORGE JEFFERSON IS PAYING FOR THE PARTY !! GO DEMOCRATS ! GO! GO U.S.A. GO! Sincerely, Lake Hart, a Native American Writer.
Posted by: Lake Hart - A Native American Writer | May 18, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
After reading the postings I can conclude that those that proclaim themselves as republicans have no clue really about politics. They kept saying that Obama is a danger to American foreign policy and should not be elected.
Yet are country is on the brink of another war with Iran. And all that Bush can do is talk about firing salvos at the Obama?
This is presidential race is a race issue. I’m not voting for the spoiled and stupid white man who serve rich oil corporations and auto industry. They have done nothing good for us these last 8 years and our economy is worst than it was before. Yet all they can do is talk about Obama negatively.
The republican party is a bunch fools. People need to wake up and see for themselves that another 4 years of republican leadership will only worsen our country further.
Posted by: Thebrightside | May 19, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Many think that it would not help to talk to Iran etc. but how do you know what they have if you don’t speak with them. how will you know how they think if you don’t speak to them. That is the point. you never know what you can accomplish in talks, but first you have to talk to someone. It is easy to talk to people who already like you, there is no effort or thought put into that. But when you speak to those who don’t, you have to do a lot more listening than you normally would and do more critical thinking. And to that person up there who stated that those other countries have not attacked us. If you want to be technical about it, neither has Iran, and neither did Sadaam attack us directly either (as far as i know, correct me if i’m wrong)but we went over there and started a war in that country. Look Sadaam Hussein might have been a horrible person, but he did not send two plane to the us and take down our towers, Bin Laden is, and look he is still alive making videos
Posted by: KC | May 19, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
TRUTH HURTS:
You’ve got it wrong!
The fact is the Democrat Party owns
the KKK! They still have a Senator,
Robert C Byrd of West Virginia who
is a “former” KKK member!
In the 1960′s the southern governors
rubber hosing and suppressing blacks
were named George Wallace and Lestor Maddox and they were Democrats!
Those are facts unlike your BS rant
against republicans!
The Republican Party is the Party of
Abraham Lincoln and the Democrat Party
is the Party of the KKK!
Posted by: reaganfan | May 19, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
For those of you that claim that Iran has not attacked us I got news for you. Iran supports the insugency in Iraq. Iran provides the weapons and military personnel to train the insurgents that are killing our soldiers in Iraq. I know you all going to say that we should not been there in the first place, that is for debate and history will tell how wrong we were, or not.
Posted by: Frank | May 19, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am
You guys wouldn’t object to intelligence gathering would you? Don’t you think that personal knowledge of leaders, both terrorist and of rogue countries, wouldn’t give our leadership a clue about how they think and what they might be planning in the future? You can tell so much more in person.
Know thy enemy.
We have become so arrogant I don’t recognize this country any more.
Posted by: Susan | May 19, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
I wonder if President Obama will pardon the Bush war criminals on his first day in office??
Posted by: Beka13 | May 19, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Psychologists tell us that when children physically attack other children it is attibutable to their inability to talk and iron out their differences. Sound familiar? It should because it is a perfect definition of GW Bush and John McCain. Just as a frustrated 3 yr old child settles his differences with playmates with his fists, so does Bush and McCain. Does that mean that they lack the ability to talk and straighten out differences? Probably.
If all of our global leaders had the same attitude, no doubt, the earth would be nothing more than fragments of itself floating in outer space.
Posted by: Drummerboy | May 19, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
“…Obama called the dust-up “appealing,” after Bush said in Israel at the Knesset that it was a mistake to talk about diplomacy with “terrorists and radicals.”
He called it “appealing”? I highly doubt that.
Posted by: S.P. Ellchek | May 19, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Why is there so much hate for Obama. As some of the news analyst have stated all our lives we have been taught to use our words and discuss out differences, but Bush came along and decided to bully the world. It is sad that we can not stick to the issues. Kennedy and Reagan had to nogetiate that is how things get done. Remember the world is watching, if the US wants to implement policies on other nations, we have to stop smearing hate about its own over the internet. Please stop the hate.
Posted by: Tosha | May 19, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
No Iran is not going to attack the US, but has every intention to completly destroy Iseral. They have millions of young people willing to destroy themselves for this purpose, as the did in the Iran/Iraq
war of the 80′s. So does obam intend to sit a military exchange out? No one will ever talk them out of destroying Iseral.
So – obam can convince Iran to drop plans to destroy Iseral? How is going to do that?
It’s all about oil. China will have an est. 400 million cars and trucks on the road 10 years from now, as compared with 30 million today. China is no friend of the US, and aids Iran now to tie up future oil supplies. We urgently need to get out of the oil trap, not talk. China pays , today, 1.54 per gallon, Europe before taxes, 2.61 per gallon. We pay 3.50 after taxes. Life in the US would be practically un-liveable if our sources were diverted to China & India. Get a grip obam, and talk to the oil consumers of the world first. Commission a “Manhattan Project” to get us out of what appears to be a bleak future.
Posted by: zz | May 19, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Poster “Sam” tells us that Roosevelt did not talk with our enemies before he declared war on Japan. Hmmm, Sam, our Navy had been attacked um-a, like Pearl Harbor. Does Sam really think that FDR would have used diplomacy AFTER we were attacked in Pearl Harbor? Same goes for Korea … the North invaded the South … emphasis on the word invaded. These were acts of war Sammy. There’s no room for talk after a nation commits an act of war. You are comparing apples and oranges in your post. Who is this Kelly person who you quote. I’d really like to know as this person also needs to see the comparisons hold no water.
Posted by: 6th Fleet | May 19, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Obama believes he is the savior of America. He will win the War in Iraq, get us out of debt, provide everyone with health care, find Osama, create peace in the Middle East, Stop Global Warming, and develop new fuel resorces. Thats amazing. But tell me how will he win the war in Iraq by running away. Lets just pack everything up and let the Iraqis fend for themselves, who cares right. Then with all that debt and health care problems. You might as well break out the check book because taxes are about to go through the roof….Osama?… There will never be peace in the Middle East. Global Warming, come on now, America can do all they can but it has to be a world effort to even do anything helpful. And last but not least oil. Well theres a problem even for the great “experienced” Obama… Man people will believe anything that man tells them.
Posted by: 1_vote | May 19, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Oh my goodness Reaganfan, Byrd endorsed Obama? Most democrats have done the same. Monday, Warren Buffett endorsed Obama too.
Posted by: Dawn | May 20, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
He reminds me of JFK. Plus, he makes good common sense – a simple thing. It will improve our image around the world if he’s elected President. JFK had dignity class and so dose Obama. What I like about Obama is his use of the word ‘we’ when he’s addressing an audience. It is powerful word, full of hope. I like this guy and if he loses I’ll feel like we’d have lost an important chance to turn this country back to it’s values and the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Posted by: terry | May 20, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Who is John McCain,son and grandson of admirals,does that make him a leader? Navy pilot,shot down over North Vietnam, spent 5 1/2 years being brainwashed and tortured by his captors,can he be trusted to lead the country? Senator from Arizona,was involved in the Keating savings and loan scandal which cost the American tax payers 2.5 billion dollars,accepted gifts and gratuites from Keating, vacationed at Keatings’ vacation home in the Bahamas, Who is McCain trying to fool, who made him a hero ,wasn’t it the left wing media? Can we really trust McCain to lead ?And to where?You might put a pretty face on it but it’s the same old failed conservative policy.
Posted by: JOHN H BALDWIN | September 11, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm