May 28, 2008 10:42pm

Obama Camp: Trip Overseas Is ‘Under Consideration’

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller reports: Sen. Barack Obama brushed off Sen. John McCain’s recent criticisms of him as more of the same "diversions" that are "standard fare" for the Republicans, but his campaign spokeswoman said he is considering a trip abroad.

McCain has been criticizing Obama for not having been to Iraq since 2006, his only trip to the war zone. The Arizona Republican says Obama can’t really know the situation in Iraq if he has not seen it first-hand.

On the plane ride from Colorado to Chicago, Obama told reporters that McCain and the Republicans don’t have much ground to stand as they try to make an issue out of the frequency of his visits to Iraq.

"The Republicans don’t have a strong position to argue when it comes to substance," he said. "Their foreign policy has been a failure over the last eight years. The war in Iraq was a huge strategic blunder, our standing in the world is diminished, we’ve spent hundreds of billions of dollars and lost thousands of lives, Afghanistan is in worse shape than anytime since 2001 and we have [al Qaeda leader Osama] bin Laden sending out audio tapes, so not surprisingly they’re not going to want to argue the substance of what’s happened in their foreign policy, they’re going to come up with diversions."

McCain extended Obama an invitation to go to Iraq with him. According to Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki a trip to Iraq is not out of the question, but a trip with McCain is.

"A trip abroad is under consideration but there are no plans at this point," Psaki said. "But Iraq is a place to consider."

McCain said today in Reno, "Sen. Obama has been to Iraq once a little over two years ago, he went and he has never seized the opportunity except in a hearing to meet with General Petraeus [the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq]."

Today Obama responded to a question about McCain’s remarks with a laugh.

"That’s just a typical sarcastic comment that doesn’t haven’t anything to do with the substance and is patently untrue, since I just saw General Petraeus when he was testifying in Washington," he said.

Obama was challenged further, asking why he had not had meeting with Petraeus that was outside of a hearing.

"This is just a flip comment, it’s not designed to actually talk about substance," Obama responded curtly not answering why he had not held meeting with Petraeus. "It’s a political comment that doesn’t get anywhere."

Obama in his campaign trip to general election states this week has been solely focused on McCain, and he says he’s not surprised the Republicans and McCain have been focused so aggressively on him.

"So far this is pretty standard Republican fare," he said of the back-and-forth with McCain recently. "He’s adapted George Bush policies and he’s going to adopt George Bush’s tactics. I don’t know why anybody would be surprised by that."

Obama will take a break from campaigning Thursday, spending the day with his family in Chicago. Then he’ll return to the campaign trail, hitting the last two primary states of Montana and South Dakota heading into the weekend.

User Comments

I love how he acts just like Bush above the rest of us .

Posted by: Bishop | May 28, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

You know most democrats said if Bush got elected he take us to war with Iraq every one just forgets that. I think the lying media played a big role in the run up to the war most of us uneducated voters did not want this war,and knew it was the wrong move.

Posted by: Bishop | May 28, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

This is a crock – so none of us now in the U.S. can have an opinion on the Iraq war (or any other foreign policy issue) unless we’ve actually visited the country?
Okay then, I’ve been to Iraq and McCain is full of **it. He has no idea of what is going on culturally there or how to secure Iraq. He is needlessly provoking Iran into another conflict. He is a shadow of the man I voted for in 2000.

Posted by: MIguy | May 28, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

The irony about Barack considering a trip abroad is that since he’s chaired the subcommittee on Foreign Relations (beginning in Jan 2007), the only country he’s been to is England for a long weekend.
In all probability, his passport has expired. If, however, he does manage to visit Iraq, he’ll probably want to have a nice chat and spot of tea with some of the Iranian-backed terrorists.

Posted by: Emily | May 28, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Poor McCain, what a loser. He can barely read a speech written for him off the TelePrompTer. Sniping sarcastic and caustic comments will backfire on him. He comes across as a shallow, little, spiteful excuse for a man. Just because you were a POW doesn’t give you the right to act like an ass*, or give you the privilege to say anything and everything without accountability for the facts. Even repugnants can’t stand this man. McCain= Bush, simple fact. He will lose in a landslide to the Dems in November.

Posted by: rob | May 28, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

“… and is patently untrue, since I just saw General Petraeus when he was testifying in Washington,” he said.
McCain said Obama hasn’t met with Petraeus outside of a hearing and then Obama confirms that. So it is Obama that is lying. Obama will try but fail to fool anyone with lame tactics like this. Clinton he’s not.

Posted by: John Bell | May 28, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

We can’t afford a President that has to take on-the-job training. It’s time to move Hillary Clinton into the role of nominee and the eventual President.
========================================
Hillary in ’08 or ’12, the lower the year number the higher the IQ of the Democratic Party!
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 28, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

i wounder where mccain learned foreign policy.. at least obama went to colombia to study political science..
this is a senator from arizona who don’t know whether he is democrat, republican or in-between.. i think he should add liberman to his ticket so he can learn from him the differnce between ‘sunni & shia’ or “alqueda & iran”..
what a joke.. mccain is finally talking foreign policy..

Posted by: mohsin | May 28, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Sluggo: Hillary should do a lot of things, but taking your advice is not one of them. Not your usual wit in your post, I’m disappointed.

Posted by: MIguy | May 28, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Yep, Obama is just an empty suit. albeit a nice suit, but still just an empty suit.

Posted by: gcbfred | May 28, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Sluggo: Got it – I like your usual one or two sentence punchlines, but that one needed something more methinks.

Posted by: MIguy | May 28, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Obama speaks of Afghanistan being “…in worse shape than anytime since 2001…”. Isn’t he the chair of the committee that is supposed to be studying serious issues related to Afghanistan, and they have not met? Maybe, it was just an appointment to make him look like he has some experience. After his state legislative “experience”, maybe he thinks you really do not have to be in attendance to chair the committee.
He would not know what to look for or ask if he did go. Besides, he is only interested in getting troops out in 16 months, no matter what changing cirucumstances might dictate. Then, of course, he could send troops back in if necessary. God help us–he is green!

Posted by: georgia | May 28, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

I’ve read a number of articles about McCain and the war in Iraq and what he says makes sense. He is saying that if we pull out quickly the war in Iraq will be to no avail. We have to continue to support and train Iraqis so that they will eventually hold their own and not need American intervention. I’ve also read they are finally having success with this. Listening to Obama it’s almost as though he hasn’t done his homework on this. It seems as though he’s just saying what he thinks the voters want to hear. I wish McCain would propose that offer to Hillary and I would like to hear her response. How Obama is reacting to the Iraq situation kind of makes me wonder just how knowledgeable he actually is.

Posted by: jab | May 28, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

@jab: Iraq is more secure because we are paying the Sunni tribes and including them rather than equating all Sunnis with the Ba’ath party. Our military is striking against the Shiites, who we mistakenly thought were our “friends”. We have inserted ourselves in a tribal war. The Iraq war was won by our military years ago; it is the diplomats in the US and Iraq who have failed. The reason Iraq is making progress is precisely because the Iraqi government now realizes there is a timeline and an end to US patience and money. They have to figure it out or they’ll get killed – that’s a great incentive in my opinion.

Posted by: MIguy | May 28, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Hey! I have an idea! When Obama goes to Iraq, maybe he can take his uncle, the one who helped liberate Auschwitz!
Oh….wait a second…..

Posted by: Kerri | May 28, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

BO talking about foreign policy is nauseating. It is apparent that he cares nothing about the majority of Americans concerns besides the Middle East. He seems to thing that a trip overseas is going to make him appear big n mighty. His underestimation of American intelligence is insulting.

Posted by: xixi | May 28, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Obama should NOT go to Iraq.
The Republicans know that they can’t win the General Election from Obama, they want him to go to Iraq so that their Blackwater mercenaries can take him out.

Posted by: JF Sebastian | May 29, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

ok, so obama goes to iraq and finds either the disaster that we know it to be, or he finds a bastion of american loving citizens… and if he finds the former, will mccain admit he’s a failure just like his mentor bush? doubt it….

Posted by: earthisnotflat | May 29, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Doesn’t have the gonads to commit!
Par for Obama.
Just like his voting record

Posted by: seah | May 29, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Barack, if you go to Iraq; you better watch out for Al Quada, insurgents and the US troops too. We do not like you or trust you plus we are heavily armed no thanks to you. In fact, you did not want us to have body armor. Dont come to Iraq; you are not wanted ass wipe. You claim that you did not vote for the invasion in Iraq. Wooo. You are special. Fact is, your a junior senator who was not in office at the time so you could not vote. Your a fool but you will not fool the 2.2 million troops who will be voting against you.

Posted by: Marines Call me Doc | May 29, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Why do you people worry about Obama meeting with Iranian terrorists? He values the US relationship with Israel–a nation born out of terrorism.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | May 29, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Stay SAFE Mr. Obama. YOU are the first ray of hope this nation has had in decades! Iraq IS NOT WORTH THE VISIT! Not at this point! We need you here, and we need to make sure you get this presidency! I would not trust McSame any further than I could see him.

Posted by: RW | May 29, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

BO should go to Zimbabwe and defend the American ‘sweetie’ that Mugabe called a hooker.

Posted by: ahnuld | May 29, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Soldiers that I have talked to (you know the real ones that are in Iraq), don’t seem to thrilled to vote for McCain…go figure…they would like to see America again before they go on their 4th, 5th, or 10th tour of duty.
Don’t proport to speak for America’s fighting men and women. They can vote for themselves…and think…and they KNOW what is going on in Iraq.
Active duty personnel can’t say anything openly about what they think, but they tell their familes a whole lot….let them and their familes vote how they want and don’t assume you know what that might be.

Posted by: HUH? | May 29, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Whether or not Obama visits Iraq is not particularly pertinent. What is more important is for the US to vacate Iraq in a timely manner.

Posted by: Carl58 | May 29, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Trip Overseas Is ‘Under Consideration’
So, I see that Obama is considering a trip overseas. That is only fair,that when he loses the nomination that he take his Michelle (first time in my adult life I’ve been proud to be an American)on a slow boat to China kind of trip.
The man always seems to be playing at catch-up, never quite ahead of the game.
Axelrod has indeed created an empty suit that George Soros can totally control.
But that will never happen because Clinton will be the next President.

Posted by: An American in Canada for David | May 29, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Dems are DONE in this 2008 Presidential Election. No matter which candidate is nominated, Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, there will plenty of angry (and, disfranchised) Dems who feel their votes were not counted and consequently either stay home on the Election Day or worse, vote for McCain. SAD, VERY VERY SAD.

Posted by: ablanche08 | May 29, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Senator Obama does need to listen to the troops in Iraq and notice I stated LISTEN. He has said he would withdraw the troops, check around for the enemy and send our troops back in if needed. That is a stupid way of managing the war. The Iraqis need to take over. They have had more than enough time and resources. I think they are a weak people. It has cost too many American lives and American dollars. It was a mistake to invade in the first place based on lies.

Posted by: Mary | May 29, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

How Cute ! Now he can play President just like Jimmy Carter !

Posted by: kneedermyer | May 29, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

OBAMA IS NOMINEE IN-TRAINING
WHEN HE IS NOT LEARNING FROM HILLARY CLINTON, HE IS TAKING MCCAIN’S ADVICE.
MY BE HE SHOULD BE VYING FOR MCCIAN’S VP

Posted by: TJ | May 29, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

This guy is so slick, avoiding every political challenges with vague talks on anything but Obama policies.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 29, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

“Afghanistan is worse than anytime in 2001…” I think that he doesn’t know what’s going on there either. Iraq is a mess, no one really disputes that (although it is better now than it was…but it was damn bad then too). Afghanistan is much better now that the Taliban is gone. It should’ve been our main focus all along.

Posted by: GLR | May 29, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

Let’s all go with McCain to a market in Iraq and get some good bargains with security forces all around us for protection.
He knows NOTHING about Iraq.

Posted by: MLB | May 29, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

I think i’s a good idea for Obama to go to Iraq with McCain. There is a misconception that all the troops are ultra-conservatives and that trip would be an opportunity for McCain to upstage Obama. I believe the opposite would happen.
After retiring for the military, I have continued to live and work among the troops overseas for the past 10 years. They are prohibited by law from any political activism except overt displays of support for the Commander and the mission. But, I am detecting levels of political interest among them that I’ve never seen before.
Here is my prediction. When senators Obama and McCain go to Iraq, you will hear a chorus building to a crescendo of Obama chanting. I suggest they should also do joint tours of all of the overseas troop locations. Obama’s website shows that he has an advocacy group of Americans Abroad. At the same time we get an opportunity to see what our allied nations think.
The next election is not only important to us Americans. The whole world has a stake in it. We won’t be able to tackle our problems with terrorism, the wars, and the economy alone. Our troops, who are suffering and sacrificing the most, will be the first to tell you how badly damaged our international image is. They understand the urgent need to start making repairs.
It’s time for change.

Posted by: jrenkx | May 29, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

jrenkx, I keep seeing that word, change change change and how Obama is going to bring it. I just never see HOW he’s going to bring it. Can you tell me? The guy is a phony.

Posted by: Ryan | May 29, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

OK Ryan, since you asked I’ll tell you what change means for me.
I read all of the complaints that senator Obama is short on substance and senator Clinton is stronger on details. Anyone who believes the candidate who has nailed down all the details doesn’t understand how the government works. Presidents only make proposals. The details are ironed out in the congress. Senator Clinton should have learned that lesson when she tried to push her health care solution whole cloth to the congress during her husband’s administration.
Presidents can bully congress or veto them but then we end up with the disastrous, ineffective government we have had over the past 7 years. Change 1, I want a government that works.
I have visited all of the candidates websites. Senators Obama has ideas and proposals for all of the issues, but his site is unique. After each of his issues he has a link that says “Present your ideas.” That tells me that he is not so arrogant as to believe he has all that answers. He is open minded and ready to reach out. Change 2, I want a government that will be inclusive and will listen to me and everyone else who offers constructive ideas.
I could go on with an entire list, but I’ll stop here.

Posted by: jrenkx | May 29, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

Anything said in criticism of Obama is dismissed as a “diversion”. Don’t mind the fact that there is truth in what McCain is saying….it’s a diversion. Barry has ignored the reality on the ground in Iraq and is afraid to admit he was wrong in calling the surge a mistake.

Posted by: Jim | May 29, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am

Firstly anyone who says Obama is just an empty suit needs to start reading his books. You can disagree with him, you can think his vision for America is wrong, but the guy has a brain and a vision.
Secondly, i love that some people seem to think that the guy born of a Kenyan father, in Hawaii who lived in Indonesia during young childhood, is the one with no idea about the outside world. McCain’s world vision seems to me to be dominated by the military. He seems to have little time for diplomacy or anything short of the troops. The best and most courageous soldiers should know that the best way to avoid casualties is to avoid war, if at all possible.
Finally, McCain himself, I believe I am right in saying, would not need a passport to visit Iraq if its on Congressional business. Would he not travel under a diplomatic passport? [Not the same thing!]
Its odd to me just how resistant some people can be to the idea of change.

Posted by: markymark | May 29, 2008, 6:30 am 6:30 am

Don’t underestimate the loyalty veterans hold for other veterans. Obama will walk a fine line if he starts to impugn McCain’s service to his country.
You may disagree with the war and the cost of American lives but, America has an all volunteer military and our troops are there because they want to be. When you degrade anyone that supports the troops you affront the very people you should be supporting.
Obama’s inexperience in foriegn policy will come out more as the election unfolds. So will McCain’s inexperience on economics come forth.
If you don’t like your choices, the time for a third party is now.
REGISTER INDEPENDENT and free yourself from the party mentality of voting for a party and not the individual.

Posted by: '68 VNvet | May 29, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am

I know the reason Obama does not go to Iraq.It’s simple.He is a “COWARD”.Listen to Obama,he avoids and never stands up to or for anything. He is even scared of Hillary.He is and never will be a leader.

Posted by: GDC | May 29, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

What we are witnessing is the slow death of old democratic politics as usually. Let us bow our heads.. the death of the Republican Party GOOD OLE BOY POLITICS IS NEAR.. it is on life support now…any body want to write the obits for these funerals..

Posted by: Lawrence | May 29, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Obama keeps saying he didn’t vote(support) the Iraq war when it started- He didn’t vote because he wasn’t in the U.S. Senate then and COULDN’T VOTE.

Posted by: unstoppable 08 | May 29, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Does anyone here really want McCain as president ? Do you want 4 more years of “Bush” ? Isn’t that the worse case scenario ?

Posted by: GetaLife | May 29, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

It doesn’t really matter what Obama says or doesn’t say. Those of you who hate him for whatever reason, will continue to do so. It is really pointless to argue with you.

Posted by: daveed | May 29, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

What the troops need to hear from Obama or Clinton is this–”On 1-20-2009, I will issue orders for the withdrawal of all of our military forces from Iraq” What the troops do not need to hear is another of John ‘Baghdad Bob’ McCain’s routine in the marketplace wearing a bullet proof vest and heavily protected by American soldiers saying that everything is peachy in Iraq. How many of our fine soldiers were killed in Iraq after that Lying speech? How Many?

Posted by: jjrousseau55 | May 29, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Iraq is a place we should have left years
ago..
McBush is a man that is in love with Iraq
and seems not to care about the USA.

Posted by: Anita Yova | May 29, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Mary,
You are right, pulling troops, then sending them back as needed is stupid – because of the following…
The troops will be obvious and frequent targets during their coming and going. They should only be moved once to leave, and only when it is safe and ready.

Posted by: SoniaB | May 29, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

If we leave iraq on a whim, $4.00 gas will seam cheap. Be realistic people none of the candidates are going to pull out of Iraq and let the middle east collapse which is what it will do if we leave. The only reason we are in Iraq is to keep some simblence of stability. if that is possible in that region. Face it, we need their oil to keep our economy running unless we all want to go back to the horse and buggy days. it is our elected officials responsiblity to protect our economy and interestes as well as our people. We have to blame someone for our problems it just as well be GWB. All of the presidntial candidates are to blame for not taking he opportunity and leadership to free us from dependence on foreign oil long ago. They are all in a position to have done something long ago. Now they expect us to believe they care enough to change things. Thats all BS. and we people that think outside of the box know better.

Posted by: Josh Irvin | May 29, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I’d rather Obama not waste his time visiting me over here. It’s clear he doesn’t keep an open mind on what my soldiers and I are doing here. He’s already decided that our efforts be damned, the war is lost and not worth fighting.
All in all, considering that Obama stupidly thinks Afghans speak Arabic, I don’t want to see his face. If I had anything to say to him, it would be “Go home, appeaser, we don’t want you here.”

Posted by: J Cline | May 29, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Senator Obama finally realized a trip to Iraq might be a good Idea? What committee is he in charge of? As the Parent of a US Marine I find his lack of attention to the priorities of his commitee insulting. It seems that Senator McCains experiance is already seperating itself from Senator Obamas retoric without action.

Posted by: jim | May 29, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

His response to mccain pointing out that he should actually visit iraq before telling us all that we have lost and must surrender is to call this a diversion. everything this guy screws up on is “a diversion”. direct presidential meetings with terrorist presidents must be a diversion, and not visiting iraq to speak with generals is a diversion, and his fantom voting record of present is a diversion, and his wife that hates america is a diversion, and the racist preacher he sat in front of for 20 years is a diversion, and his getting his rivals thrown off the state ballot when he ran for his state seat is a diversion, and his poll numbers in battleground states is a diversion, and his not wanting votes in florida and michigan to count must also be a diversion. this guy is too much. what a paper jacket.

Posted by: fred | May 29, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Will the media continue toallow Obama to get away with evasive responses and generalities during the generaL election campaign?

Posted by: Luanne Laib | May 29, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Since McSame is sending out invitations, maybe Obama should send a few of his own…..
He should invite McBush to visit closed down factories and the people who are reduced to working two or three minimum wage jobs and still coming up short month after month.
Or the homes of those families losing their properties to foreclosure and are one step from being out on the street!
Or perhaps a trip to a grocery store to watch people try to figure out how to fit the bare essentials into their ever decreasing budget.
Or a stop at a gas station where some have hit rock bottom and must resort to stealing fuel just to get back and forth to jobs that don’t pay enough to get out of bed for!
How about trips to correctional institutions to meet those who if given access to a proper education, may have become productive and valuable assets to the country!
And, just for laughs, how about a trip to the morgue where many have ended up because they simply could not afford the healthcare that may have saved their lives!
Perhaps Obama does need to take a trip to Iraq, but the time has come to start taking care of our own first! Besides, he doesn’t need make a trip to know that this unjustified war manufactured by a egomaniac with the intelligence gnat needs to come to a end!
Plus, McSame’s vast experience includes helping to write the talking points used to sell this heinous war. He carried Bush’s foul water and continues to do so to this day. Our current situation is in part a direct of result of that so called “experience” McSame keeps harping on. At this point, I’d sooner give a monkey a gallon of gas and a box of matches before I’d trust McBush with our nation’s security!

Posted by: Angela Frazier Memphis, TN | May 29, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Obama, don’t do it! It’s a trap!
Please…Obama should have been doing surprise visits like McCain long ago. He has avoided going because he would have to report that some progress has occurred, which would undermine his arguments that no progress can be made there.
Should Obama never visit Iraq, or another dangerous nation, if he becomes president?
It does not bother me that people criticize the handling of the Iraq war. It bothers me that some openly wish and hope that it will get worse for political gain.

Posted by: Wade | May 29, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Obama is supposed to be going to Europe and the Middle East as a fact finding mission, to save the lives of American soldiers and to insure the security of Americans … but, as usual, Obama is turning his responsibilities into a promotional photo op. Our country’s problems are serious, and it’s getting rather disgusting watching Obama the Opportunist, use America to further his personal ambition and aggrandizement. Also, the three network anchors, and the rest of the media, who are tripping over each other to accompany Obama overseas should be ashamed of themselves.

Posted by: Gina | July 17, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.