By Nitya

May 21, 2008 2:42pm

Obama Hits Florida, Focuses on McCain

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller Reports: Touching down in the Sunshine State for the first time since September, Democratic frontrunner Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., took only seven minutes to remind Florida voters Wednesday that as of Tuesday’s contests he has captured the majority of pledged delegates.

"It is good to be back in Florida, it’s good to be back. I know you guys have been holding down the fort," Obama told the crowd of 15,000 in Tampa, "Last night I was in Iowa because we marked a significant moment in our campaign where we achieved a majority of the pledged delegates that are assigned in this election. And, so, we are at the threshold of being able to obtain this nomination."

Obama praised his party rival Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., for an "admirable campaign, quickly changing focus to the presumptive Republican nominee John McCain, targeting him on foreign policy and lobbying.

Watch the VIDEO HERE.

"Look at his foreign policy," Obama exclaimed of McCain, "He has been spending the last week describing his foreign policy by explaining who he won’t talk to. I mean that’s his whole foreign policy ‘I won’t talk to that guy and I won’t talk to that guy, and I won’t talk to that guy.’"

Obama was referencing the back and forth of last week between himself and McCain over sitting down to meet with both friends and enemies of the US. Bush and McCain have criticized Obama for his stance to sit down with leaders of rogue nations.

Obama this weekend doubled down on criticisms of McCain for the resignation of five of his staffers for lobbying ties. But today, the senator drummed up some research to make his case that McCain says one thing about lobbying when he’s a senator and another as presidential candidate.

"John McCain offered a bill that said he would ban a candidate from paying registered lobbyists. And he did this because he said that having lobbyists on your campaign was a conflict of interest. This is what he said 10 years ago. Well I’ll tell you that John McCain then would be pretty disappointed with John McCain now because he hired some of the biggest lobbyists in Washington to run his campaign, and when he was called on it, his top lobbyist actually had the nerve to say the American people won’t care about this."

The Obama campaign says that Obama was referencing legislation in 1996 and 1997 that was introduced by McCain to prohibit campaigns from hiring lobbyists.

Senator McCain’s campaign was quick to respond to this charge.  “Despite his own campaign’s ties to lobbyists, nothing comes between Barack Obama and a partisan political attack," McCain spokesmen Tucker Bonds said, "In Senator Obama’s world, lobbyists can raise money and advise his campaign on policy issues, their families can contribute but supposedly they have no role. It’s absurd, despite his own rhetoric, Senator Obama still refuses to disclose the list of lobbyists advising his campaign. What is Senator Obama hiding?"

Senator Obama campaigns throughout Florida for the next two days – wrapping up his first trip to Florida this year on Friday. The campaign says Obama will continue to highlight the differences between himself and McCain during his time in Florida, an important battleground state in the general election.

User Comments

It is so fun to watch the Republicans on the defensive for a change.
Chuck Hagle coming out in defense of Obama’s positions was outstanding.
No wonder the republicans want Hillary to be the nominee.
John McCain is outclassed big time.

Posted by: Rita | May 21, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Here are the vote counts:
Clinton 18,200,357
Obama 18,148,061

Posted by: a new name | May 21, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Obama the transparent candidate! Where is that list of lobbyists working on your campaign Senator Obama? Any luck finding the 8 years of state senate records yet? What do you think your campaign advisors company was really doing when they breeched the passport security for all three candidates – covering something up for Obama? And how do all those Floridians like seeing you? Are you telling them that their votes don’t count now, but you demand that they vote for you later?

Posted by: calli | May 21, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Calli….give it up, Hillary is OVER…she lost…

Posted by: newera | May 21, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Ha!
Does he really think Florida wants to hear his argument about delegate math? What a joke!
There was a piece in the NYT claiming that Oregon is a swing state. I live in Oregon and it will go dem,, no matter who’s on the ticket this year. Yes, we’re a little quirky and have a divide in the state, but the green corridor far outnumbers the rest of the state.
However, Florida is truly the definition of a swing state. There is little hope that Obama can swing it in his direction after his “rules are more important than voters” argument. And to start off with that shows just how disconnected he is with a majority of voters.
I have a question as well. I read somewhere that Dean said that though the delegates of Florida are i question, the votes “of course” count, as they were certified elections with downticket dems as well. Is this true? and why is no one talking about that?

Posted by: drae | May 21, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

People make up crap in their own minds to play victim if nothing else. When did Obama say that the votes of Floriday don’t count? He was following the rules established by the party.
Get over this phoney outrage and start focusing on issues.

Posted by: hkeith | May 21, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

I pray that Hillary understands that we need to join together. If things had been the opposite, I would DEFINATELY vote for Hillary, but it will be OB…

Posted by: cindyct | May 21, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Obama sent his lawyers to block a Florida revote when everyone else strongly favored it. Does he honestly think he can now compete there?

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 21, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Mr. BHO: It’s too little, too late; you phony hypocrite, and sure loser in November. You are stealing the nomination.

Posted by: phony | May 21, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Again it is not the votes that don’t count at the moment. It is just the pledged delegates. But by all means, keep believing what you like. Obama refused all solutions to a certified election.
But hey, just keep “hoping” that Florida will forget about it.

Posted by: drae | May 21, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Hillary has not lost and Obama has not won. It is up to the superdelegates and they don’t count until they vote on the convention floor! Hillary is not giving up, and neither are her supporters. And we will never, ever vote for Obama – EVER! Obama is suffering from premature victory celebration!

Posted by: calli | May 21, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Yes, all players were given several options and discussions were held, regardless of what you want to believe. Obama’s team nixed all options.
I suggest you get YOUR facts straight.

Posted by: drae | May 21, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

In answer to your question drae: according to the DNC RULES – only the pledged delegates may be stripped from a state, the popular vote is not affected and the RULES allow for the popular vote to count. So Hillary is correct and following the RULES by counting the popular vote for MI and FL. Obama removed his name off the ballot in MI – no RULES said he had to do it. Obama and Edwards ran phone banks telling people to vote uncommitted on the ballots – that was a violation of the RULES. Obama advertised in FL – that was a violation of the RULES. Hillary is leading in the popular vote – and the media and Obama can say all day she is not, but the RULES say she is!

Posted by: frisco girl | May 21, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Thanks frisco girl, that’s what I thought I understood, but how can the MSM continue to misrepresent and misreport?
Apparently propaganda is alive and well in the nation of the free press.

Posted by: drae | May 21, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Thanks frisco girl, that’s what I thought I understood, but how can the MSM continue to misrepresent and misreport?
Apparently propaganda is alive and well in the nation of the free press.

Posted by: drae | May 21, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

frisco girl is smart!
Why in the world does BHO characterize HRC supports less-educated?

Posted by: a new name | May 21, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

So Obama is in Florida.. How pathetic..

Posted by: DMK | May 21, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

The hostages were released because Reagan negotiatied with Iran? Is that what they program into you Obama supporters at cult central? The Iranians released the hostages before they were intimidated. scared shirtless

Posted by: geevill | May 21, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

First of all, nobody asked nobody to take their name off, and nobody asked nobody to abide the DNC rules. They all volunteered not to campaign in MI and FL. Secondly, it is not only HRC’s name on the ballot. Thirdly, it is BHO who went one step further, along with a couple of other people, to take his name off the MI ballot, for no other reason but pandering Iowa voters to show that he is “more phony” to keep Iowa caucusing first. Fourth, BHO realized he made a mistake, and decided to keep his name on the ballot of FL. Fifth, since his name was on the ballot of FL, he started airing commercials in FL, breaking DNC rules. He was stopped because it was pointed out that he had been breaking rules, and he came out with a phony excuse as he does whenever he is criticized on his mistakes. Sixth, in the same vein, BHO advertised to MI voters not to vote for HRC, and vote for uncommitted as a way to show supporting the phony himself.
If any rules were broken, it is BHO who really broke the rules.

Posted by: phony | May 21, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

a new name
those aren’t the vote counts…
Michigan was a seperate election unfortunately…
the only way Hillary is the most popular candidate is in an election where oBama’s name didn’t appear.
In fact Hillary wins in elections where Sen. Obama’s name doesn’t appear on the ballot.
Good for her…but that doesn’t mean you can put up numbers from an election where voters didn’t have the choice.
duh.

Posted by: dl | May 21, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

dl -
See my post above to rebut your argument on behalf your phony BHO.

Posted by: phony | May 21, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

dl – Why should other people pay the mistake that BHO made, for taking his name off a ballot to pander the voters in Iowa and NH?
Can someone teach this cry baby that he is not going to get votes if he took his name, VOLUNTARILY, off the ballot?

Posted by: a new name | May 21, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

You know you Fla and Mi crybabies need to get over it. Obama in any situation did the right thing. Keep in mind he did not campaign in Fla, Clinton did(smells like a scam anyway) when she knew she was not supposed to. Obama can reject anything he wants to that is his right to do so and a brilliant tactical maneuver as well and if you were in his position you would have done or do the same thing. Remember these two things folks this is about winning nothing else matters. And EVERYBODY knows there is nothing fair in politics. Hill should have not campaigned in Fla and concentrated on one of those states she lost she might be in a better position today.

Posted by: porterwayne757 | May 21, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

BHO might steal the nomination, but it does not hide the fact that the so-called presumptive nominee loses 120 out 120 counties in Kentucky!
Is a phony hypocrite like this going to win the general election?

Posted by: a new name | May 21, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Who cares about Kentucky. It goes Republican in the GE.

Posted by: d | May 21, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

By the Way: I use NOLA DEM for all my post. The DEM is not for Democrat. Those are my initials.

Posted by: NOLA DEM | May 21, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

“a new name”- something from the dictionary for you
steal v. , stole , stolen , stealing , steals . v.tr. To take (the property of another) without right or permission.
Are you implying that BHO did not rightfully win it by the rules set in place by the DNC? Are you saying the nomination is tainted and should be HRC’s and no one elses? That attitude is why she lost. Think about it.

Posted by: porterwayne757 | May 21, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

a new name
why should the rest of the states be hurt because they all got educated to meeting the candidates (because the numbers don’t lie that in almost every state they started with the same numbers as FL and MI and whent he candidates got to campaign there…the numbers changed drastically toward obama)
why should other voters who actually participated in REAL elections where they got to meet the candidates …not a beauty contest where people voted for the candidate they knew as their first lady for the past 15 years (as the numbers showed almost every state started out this way…that is why you can’t count a beauty contest as an election…duh)
The state party leaders form those two states should be run out of those states… by their own voters…
No republican state congress could federally or legally interfere with an election… these states were not forced they just did not fight hard enough … and anyone who says they were forced into this situation is just covering their elected butt…
Now their processes are soooo screwed up they have failed their constituency.
and so did Hillary’s campaign…because they were the most consulted when these decision went down and the ones who made much of the rules and precedants…
the person that had the least to do with how screwed up these are… was the guy you all are trying to blame.
Truth is Hillary used these voters when it hurt her but when it didn’t hurt her and she had the biggest microphone…she said “let them eat cake.”

Posted by: dl | May 21, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Why is Barack a Potted Plant when it comes to counting all the votes?
Barack the Potted Plant. Sat in his anti-american chruch for 20 years and said nothing. Now he wants americans to vote for him. Ha! Ha! Ha!

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 21, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

amen dl
how soon people forget what hillary and bill have been like not only throughout history as the clintons, but in this primary election
the spot they are in…. i sbecuase they put themselves there
they thought htey had it all warpped up, when suddenly she got owned, and then owned some more, and suddenly her only strategy was to attack…
and throw mud and attempt to shatter obama
but that wasnt working either, so she painted him as an elitist.. LOL the clintons… paint obama an elitist
but it wasnt working, so she started to change the rules of the game, had to find ways to make the math work, and still to this day, trying to make the math work
trying desperately

Posted by: bhrandon | May 21, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Oh, isn’t he just being so presidential. That being said, his words lack a soul, a heartbeat. They are empty and hollow – words repeated from a written page, pages written for him, not by him.
Unfortunately the details about his involvement with Rezko and others will surface much too late for us to save ourselves.
Look at the man – the picture of ambiguity and deceit.

Posted by: Jill Mitchell | May 21, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Why is he in Hillary country? We Floridians cant stand him.

Posted by: andrea | May 21, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

bhrandon,
yes I watch both videos, I understand the context of both. Do you not see that the message was shifted to the audience he faced. Can anyone really be that blind? I understand and believe that some of what he says is true, very very true. But you cannot get there with just blind idealism; you cannot get there with hope. You get there by compromise, with experience, and yes with toughness when needed. Leaders of other countries are not going to just fall in line with Obama’s plans. That’s just ridiculous.
Today the world is far more dangerous and you cannot put “hope” out there to protect us.
A vote for McCain is not a vote to continue Bush, that is just so much talk. He is a different man.
I marched against the war in Iraq, I was in effect fired from my job for my political views, at the time one had to hide their opposition to the war. But there is no way I want to just walk away from it now. We broke that country, we did it. We created this mess and it is our moral duty to insure that we do not create what USSR created in Afganistan.
There is no way that a failed state that we created, especially in the middle east, will not lead to more death, war, and destruction. I hate that we are there, I hate that more than 4000 of our soldiers have died there, I HATE that so many more have come home to commit suicide and suffer what in effect was an illegal action against a sovereign state. BUT IT HAPPENED!!!
You can’t just say “Wow let’s just get out of there and everyone will listen to Obama’s vision of hope and change; all the enemies created in the last eight years are just gonna fall in.” Let’s be realistic!
We need someone who will insure that it does not become a greater mess. Obama has no experience, none in dealing with foreign leaders; no experience in crossing the aisle and getting things done; no history to back up his words.
You want me to elect him because he is a democrat. No!
There is nothing more that I want than to see a democrat back in office, but I cannot do that.
My son is 17, he has never held a gun, hell, he has never held a water pistol. I am a pacifist but I am also a realist. I want health care and roe to stand and all the rest, but not at the expense of our future; my son’s future.
Please research some more about what Obama has really said in different environments. Look, really look at his history, not what he says is his history, but the facts.
He is not ready.

Posted by: drae | May 21, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Steve,
Don’t be fooled. The middle class got screwed once Bush took office. Republicans whole strategy is to cut taxes for the top 2% and give us middle class people a couple hundred dollars which is all paid for by borrowing money from the Chinese and Japanese which is the height of fiscal irresponsibility.
Bill Clinton was dead on when he taxed the top 2% and gave tax breaks to the middle class. The middle class does not save discretionary money – they spend it which fuels the economy. The rich do well and the middle class does well. That is exactly what Obama is talking about doing but when you buy into the Republican talking points that get the rich, richer and the middle class erased then this country starts looking like a 3rd world country where only the top 2% hold all the money.
Don’t be fooled. The corporations are currently getting more welfare then the poor ever have. The corporations in Iraq are making a killing screwing the tax payers for pure greed. People with the power and money make the rules not the poor people.
Obama is not the enemy to working class people – the Republicans are. They want Corporations to have free rein on doing whatever they want while shrinking governement’s power to regulate their actions while they screw the middle class. Corporations need to do well because they hold alot of Americans retirement plans but they can’t do it at the cost of turning this country into a country of have’s and have nots.

Posted by: Derek | May 21, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Mr Obama you worked long and hard not to have my vote in the primaries count in Florida,
There comes a time when rules aren’t just rules. YOU JUST DO THE RIGHT THING>
You didn’t want my vote then and you can’t have it now.

Posted by: Really | May 22, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.