By Jennifer Parker

May 8, 2008 5:17pm

Obama May Declare Victory Before Winning

In an interview with Brian Williams on NBC, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, said  that he may declare victory on May 20 after winning the Oregon primary (assuming he does) — even though he will not have reached the magic number of 2,205 delegates.

“That will be an important day," Obama said. "If at that point we have the majority of pledged delegates, which is possible, then I think we can make a pretty strong claim that we’ve got the most runs and it’s the ninth inning and we’ve won.”

Except of course that this isn’t a fight for a majority of pledged delegates. It’s a fight for the majority of total delegates — which includes superdelegates. And the number is 2,025. Not the majority of pledged delegates — the majority of total delegates.

So to use a football analogy: Up by 14, Obama has the ball at Clinton’s 10 yard line with 30 seconds left. Clinton has been arguing with the ref to include touchdowns and field goals that they ruled illegitimate. Clinton has been trying to convince the refs to go into overtime, and she wants to move the goal posts into the stands.

Now Obama wants the game to end early, and he wants the goal posts moved to the 10-yard line.

This strikes me as possibly a huge miscalculation.

- jpt

UPDATE: The Obama campaign says that despite Obama saying on May 20 he may make the claim that his team has the most runs and "we’ve won," he was not talking about winning the nomination, but rather winning an "important metric" — pledged delegates.

User Comments

When you put enough money in the right places, you can do that.

Posted by: Jayhawk | May 8, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

the problem with this analogy is that clinton is arguing with refs, but she also keeps flipping what constitutes a touchdown for her…
she has said if we score a goal this minute we win…
ok well we made it to the five yard line, so thats pretty close,
and if we can keep obama from scoring meanwhile getting two more TD’s then we have to go into overtime…
well he scored a TD and a field goal, but because she was successful at not letting him score 2 TD’s that means she should continue, even though, she has 30 seconds left in the game…
and how many times in football have you seen the QB instead of making the last play, just kneeling the ball???
hmmm these sports analogies are fun!

Posted by: bhrandon | May 8, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Regardless of the nomination, if he is looking ahead to the GE, that is indeed a miscalculation. From the time he patted Edwards on the shoulder condescendingly in the debates, it’s been clear his weakest character flaw is arrogance. If he loses his humble pose in spring, come fall he will have no more pretense to change tense with.
The Democrats have screwed themselves royally this time by holding up a roman candle and calling it a torch. When the last round leaves the candle, it’s a dud after that.

Posted by: len | May 8, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

I’m thinking that Obama should fold before this gets serious.

Posted by: BikernAz | May 8, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Yeah..an Al Qaeda leader in Iraq has been arrested….another talking point for McCain tonight on O’Reilly.
Jon Stewart said to McCain last night that he should put Hillary on his ticket for VP. WHAT A GREAT IDEA! THEY WOULD SWEEP!!!

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

I think a better analogy is that it’s the bottom of the 9th and you’re leading as the home team. Last time I checked, the home team doesn’t have to bat in the bottom of the 9th when they’re ahead — it’d be a waste of time, just like continuing this election.

Posted by: Jane | May 8, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

What arrogance! I’m a Democrat supporting Hillary, but I cannot WAIT to vote for McCain if Obambi is the Dems’ nominee.

Posted by: jbrumbel | May 8, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

BikernAz:
What do you mean? Obama should fold….huh?

Posted by: tony | May 8, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

I care less if HUSSEIN OBAMA declares
victory……..that’s his business..
I WILL VOTE FOR JOHN McCAIN.
A GREAT AMERICAN HERO….
End of the story…….

Posted by: Nicholas | May 8, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

I wonder how obama and his handlers are dealing with the fact that more that half of the country do not want him for president. this is not a race thing. it is he is underqualified-he, and they know it-and they know the country knows it.

Posted by: jgaw | May 8, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

OBAMA WINS ONLY 26% OF WHITE WORKING CLASS…..CAN’T WIN WITH THAT…SORRY.
THIS SHOULD GO ALL THE WAY TO AUGUST!
DNC and Super D’s need to really figure out how to win this mess they have got themselves in. I, myself, will watch my candidate (if Hillary not the nom) on Fox tonight. Wish McCain could choose Hillary as VP…what a great ticket.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

So Obama says he will declare himself the nominee before the nomination concludes. To paraphrase a kindergarten question: What’s it called when we take something that’s not ours?

Posted by: katrina | May 8, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

jgaw, you could have the same argument about Hillary.

Posted by: ll | May 8, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

The media and the critics keep moving the yard lines for Clinton FIRST, NH, then TX and OH were must wins, then PA, then IN. Oh yeah, she won them but it STILL isn’t good enough. Who does Obama think is to just declare victory? SOUNDS LIKE AN ARROGANT, chauvanistic, ELITIST to me! Those superdelegates better know what they are in for to just bolt his way. I say Hillary as an Independent or a write in candidate!

Posted by: Darla | May 8, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I love reading all the bloggers on many web sites and our voices are being heard. OBAMA IS A WEAK AND UNELECTABLE CANDIDATE. The democrats are screwed.
Let’s keep out there and spread our message of a nom for Obama is a vote for McCain!!!! I will make T-shirts and sell them…HILLARY SUPPORTERS VOTE McCAIN!!!!!
It is a force to be reconed with and Dean and Pelosi need to listen.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Obama is making a HUGE mistake here and pi**ing me off.
You think he follows baseball? Perhaps he should watch some reruns of the Patriots and Red Sox, with Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz.
Hillary is THE best clutch hitter in politics!!
Obama seems to forget that he needs the superdlegates to VOTE for him. Note, every SD, and arguably even delegates, may change their votes.
On numberous times I have posted to Jake’s threads the provisions of the DNC Rules allowing for the SD’s to vote independent of their locale and even the delegates to vote for a candidate not receiving the majority of votes in their locale.
HE JUST WANTS TO END IT ALL. TRUTH IS HE MAY ONLY HAVE ONE WIN MORE BEFORE THE CONVENTION. TALK OF ENTITLED?? HE WON’T HAVE ENOUGH DELEGATES TO END IT. NEITHER CANIDATE WILL. THE SD’S NEED TO VOTE THEM IN.

Posted by: countallthevotes | May 8, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Clinton spokesman Phil Singer acknowledged that even if the Michigan and Florida results counted toward the nomination, Clinton would pick up a net of 58 delegates and still be nearly 100 delegates behind Obama in the overall delegate count.

Posted by: Joe | May 8, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Seriously,i feel Obama has won the nomination.Let him go for the finals in november.

Posted by: joshua | May 8, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Good luck with that. Kind of like Bush declaring “mission accomplished”.

Posted by: Mack | May 8, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Hillary will win the nomination in the end. If she doesn’t McCain will be the next president.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 8, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

The Republicans will show Obama’s true character if Hillary doesn’t win.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 8, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

not according to the polls, if they are any guage at all. some of the obama supporters who have paid attention to the issues and watched sen. clinton,and realize she is very capable to run this country. she is certainly smarter than he is. only the obama supporters who are for him for all of the wrong reason that will not vote for her.
the clinton supporters will not vote for him because it is plain he is not as smart as she is. and why should the postition of the hardest job with many of the difficult issues that face our country and the world be given to the least of the three. obama should have taken his own advice and stayed in the senate a little longer.
as sen. clinton said “this is not a game” the american peoples lives are involved-and the times cannot afford to chance-having another inexperienced on the job training president in office.
once again obama should have kept his own counsel and stayed in the senate a little longer.

Posted by: jgaw | May 8, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Debra,
I like those T-shirts. I would buy one!!! Someone else suggested T-shirts with huge numbers “2209″ on front and back.
I had lunch today with an very zealous Obama. She is a friend and the only way we can keep the friendship is to not speak of the nomination and candidates. So, months have passed and we see eahc other daily. Today, she flat out stated Obama cannot be elected. I was a bit surprised since we never discussed Wright, Ayres, small town people. She is from a working class family, as am I. She has been politically active for years and has worked many campaigns. She still is very high on Obama but adamently believes he will never win the GE. We finally agree on something.

Posted by: countallthevotes | May 8, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Obama can call himself a winner but this is one Democrat that will not vote for him. It isn’t because of his race, but there is no way I can believe he feels loyalty toward this Country and all its people. His wife has said she has never been proud to be an American until this year so there is no way the people are going to swallow his words of loving and believing in this Country. And there is no way one can compare his 20 years listening to the raving Rev. Wright and someone having the support of a white preacher who doesn’t like certain people. I don’t know of anyone who would have sat in a church for 20 years and not have known more about the preacher than he claims he didn’t hear or know about Wright. A bunch of lies.
Democrats, we need to make sure we fill both houses with Democrats and just hope we can get to vote for Hillary otherwise I just won’t vote for the President.

Posted by: Mickey | May 8, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Don’t do it, Obama, or you’ll read like a Dewey Defeats Truman headline. Even McCain didn’t declare victory when he was way ahead until the Republican race was officially over.

Posted by: eric | May 8, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Obama is a joke.
Obama is fake.
Obama is unelectable.
He can declare any victory he wishes.
November 4th he will join the losers club.
MEMBERS ARE:
1.McGovern[1972]
2.Carter[one term][1980]
3.Mondale.[1984]
4.Dukakis[1988]
5.Gore[2000].
6.Kerry[2004]
7.Obama[2008].New member.
Mainstream white america will NOT
vote for Obama.
End of the story….
You can take it to the bank….

Posted by: Nicholas | May 8, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Let him do it and make a fool of himself. It goes to show he has no clue what the democratic process is all about. So much like his Kenyan cousin Odinga.

Posted by: 2209 | May 8, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

I can’t believe the arrogance of his statement. Actually, I can.
I applaud the American people embracing Obama early on to propel him through his 11 straight victories BEFORE educating themselves about him, BUT this is not the O.J. trial and he shouldn’t get a pass. White working class voters are a HUGE demographic and he only gets 26% of that group. I saw him walking around Washington today like a rock star with shout outs and photo ops. Is he on American Idol?
Everyone is acting so presumptive…and he thinks May 20 is when he will declare victory? He is pissing off alot of people….you betcha.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Obama doesn’t have enough pledged delegates to win so he has not won the nomination, but he is an eletist that thinks he is above working people and that he can declare himself the winner before the people vote.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 8, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Alot of you guys had a full glass of hater-aid today should drink Kool aid instead and get on the train and get this man elected.

Posted by: Joe | May 8, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Obama is going to have to win the national election without Bill or Hillary’s help. they’ve trashed him so much, how are they going to suddenly reverse course and say what a wonderful guy he is. Hillary sold out to Republican politics. She went all in. Camped out with the enemy. She has no recourse now, without looking like an idiot. Honestly, is he going to convincingly go out there and support Obama as the nominee? I think not. She’s going to go to Martha’s Vineyard for the mnth of Sept and lick her wounds. She left herself no wriggle room on this. What a pleasure it will be to have an articulate president for once, who will be widely respected around the world.

Posted by: rob | May 8, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Clinton spokesman Phil Singer acknowledged that even if the Michigan and Florida results counted toward the nomination, Clinton would pick up a net of 58 delegates and still be nearly 100 delegates behind Obama in the overall delegate count.
So why not?

Posted by: joe | May 8, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

You are right Anders Scooper. Arrogance is a strong suit of Obama’s. Too bad judgement and experience aren’t. I saw McCain with O’Reilly say those are his two biggest weaknesses. Check out savagepolitics.com and see his record on lying too.
Spoke to Hillary’s campaign office in Oregon today and they want a debate in their state….offered up four dates to BO. He has dodged her in every state, some before PENN, all after PENN. How does he think he can stand up to McCain without Hillary’s answers to agree with?
I cannot believe he is being pushed through by billionaire liberals that cannot buy a Presidency. Someone needs to look into his fundraising “bundling” of money.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Hey joe…
Obama can pick any stolen delegate he wants,but the reality check,in november
4th the white america will vote and
the rest is history…..
Americans vote for a president with a certain qualities and values.
Obama doesn’t hold those values.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 8, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

The story is that no candidate has won the nomination. Obama has not won anything and to declare himself the winner only shows arrogance. He is kinda like Rev Wright.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 8, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

joe and rob,
it is not hate for obama-it is commonsense, obama is being elected for all the wrong reasons, with the real reason for electing a president at the bottom of the list.
and rob, i hope obama will NOT want the clintons to campaign for him.
what a slap in the face-to end up losing to him for all the wrong reasons
know he is not as smart as she is, and then be asked for her brilliant mind to help him win.
no he should be the big man and say no thanks-
and I will be she will not cry for long, she will just rest and get back to work and the clintons will carry on doing the good in this world as they always have. and you say all the things you want to say about the clintons
but the good in this world and the people they have helped will not change with anything you say.

Posted by: jgaw | May 8, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Obama says. Then his “spokesman” comes out and says “what he really meant” – Bull pucky. Obama is an arrogant, condescending phony, who believes he is better than anyone on earth and has proclaimed himself The Golden Messiah. Just a few more fainting females and a few more thrills up Chris Matthews’ legs and obama will crown himself King of America.
obama hasn’t gotten the nomination yet. To proclaim a victory is just arrogant and insulting.

Posted by: Lou | May 8, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

My friends, watch what happens when Obama starts the formal debates with McCain. Poor McCain has a tough time of it, my friends. Teleprompters won’t help him in debates. My friends, he will come up with his usual snarky, snide remarks, inappropriate humor, and thinly veiled false attacks, that make him an extremely poor debater and opponent. In my opinion, even worse than his soul mate, Bush, because people seemed to identify with the likable Bush. Also, my friends, Bush did not grate on your nerves like the out of touch McCain, and had no suppressed anger, instability, and inevitable temper tantrums. This, my friends, will be wonderful to watch this fall!!!

Posted by: rob | May 8, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

If we are true dems,why not abide by the rules set?Why not support the democratic nominee?Is it wise supporting the republican candidate because of anger?

Posted by: Momo | May 8, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

He sold his soul…
The more he prances around and shows how arrogant he is the more voters get to see the real Obama.
He wins based on demographics not skill.
Go Hillary or McCain!

Posted by: cindy in nc | May 8, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Well, Rob is right about one thing.
Obama will get respect from one part of the world.
It’s the group called Hamas.
As they say, Obama is their choice

Posted by: Jayhawk | May 8, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Poor Poor Debra
You need to get out of that anger… I mean you are as you said in another post a long signed Republican who just came over to vote for Hillary…
sounds like you are grounded in the fact that she is a woman and not in any issues.
and it sounds like you are just angry that your candidate lost.
Someone who roots for McCain AND Clinton was never grounded in issues to begin with…
most of Americans this time around are grounded in issues and policies. They are sitting in the vat that was put there by voting out of anger or spite or fear or division.
and when all is said and done …they know that…they will not be fooled this time around by old school “take your eye off the ball” politics.
and as far as McCain having another talking point…it’s great that we arrested the al quaeda leader IN IRAQ…AGAIN…but theyweren’t there before this war…they have grown stronger there since this war has evolved…it’s one of many we have captured that was the head of alquaeda IN IRAQ…and yet al quaeda is growing stronger all over the world… because of this war… the army can’t find the real al quaeda leaders in Afghanistan and Pakistan…they won’t be able to with McCain’s plan because our army is stretched to thin in IRAQ… we are losing huge ground in the war in Afghanistan now…and everyone knows that our success against al quaeda and in Iraq is more political, diplomatic, and of need of help from countries and their intelligence whose people’s hate us more and more because of being in Iraq
McCain’s talking point would be addressed if the dems didn’t have to focus on each other.
But you keep rooting for McCain because you are a republican who voted for Hillary.

Posted by: dl | May 8, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Obama will not debate because it shows his lack of knowledge of the issues and he cannot stream his words.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 8, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

It’s certain Obama and his campaign are well aware of the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting on May 31st. It will be decided then whether the DNC exceeded its authority in striping MI and FL of its votes. Now he proposes to declare himself the winner on May 20th if he wins Oregon, which is a win just as certain as Clinton’s inevitable West Virginia win. He’s out to circumvent the DNC meeting on the 31st. If he carries out his premature declaration of victory, it could be very splintering for the Democratic party.

Posted by: katrina | May 8, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

It’s certain Obama and his campaign are well aware of the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting on May 31st. It will be decided then whether the DNC exceeded its authority in striping MI and FL of its votes. Now he proposes to declare himself the winner on May 20th if he wins Oregon, which is a win just as certain as Clinton’s inevitable West Virginia win. He’s out to circumvent the DNC meeting on the 31st. If he carries out his premature declaration of victory, it could be very splintering for the Democratic party.

Posted by: katrina | May 8, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Has anyone forgotten just how badly Hillary pounded Obama in the last debate?
Obama was beaten so soundly that he refused any more debates.
No courage and no ability to articulate.
Must be a Wright thing.

Posted by: Jayhawk | May 8, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

lol its funny when a democrat says they will vote for mccain over obama….
lol
so you voted for bush the first and second time then, and you were never a democrat were you?
How is hillary more qualified then Obama? Remember just because you are married to a doctor doesnt mean you can just start operating on people…
As for Obamas wife saying this is the first time she has been proud to be an american, dont you think she meant she has never been as proud as she is NOW to be an american?
If you are going to take her words at face value then you must take Hillarys Bosnia Sniper Fire story at face value, and realize that she blatantly LIED…how many times?
How many times has Hillary lied during this primary season? how many times has she changed the rules to winning?
Stop being so silly, Obama will be a wonderful president, if hillary wins ill vote for her, im not going to cry like a little baby and say ill vote for mccain..
thats just stupid, why would i want bush 2?
I was a hillary supporter until she started using terrible campaign attacks, and switching how she would or could win every day, moving hte goal post indeed…
obama 08
its time for someone who can change hte world

Posted by: bhrandon | May 8, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

jgaw, Hey I think they have done good things too….BUT I beleve he is a better choice I belive he will change things and I also think Hillary would be a more devisive pres than anyone else running. Also don’t question my comon sense Hillary can’t even pump her own gas! She can’t shoot a gun, she can’t duck sniper fire. She lies ALOT! So answer this it now looks like obama has it would you vote for him in the GE If not give me one good reson other than he is not HIllary

Posted by: Joe | May 8, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

What a typical phony hypocrite!
Are you going to trust someone like this to have his hands on the button, to first decide one thing, then, an hour later, his aids coming out to say what he really meant to decide was to un-push the button.

Posted by: bony | May 8, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Obama won’t debate because there is no point in it now. Hillary wants to debate because she can’t afford tv time anymore. Simple free press.

Posted by: Joe | May 8, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

true dem? support the party nominee?
comrade, I am for what and who is right for this country, if i had seen that obama was half as smart and half as capable as sen. clinton, I would have given him my vote-just to see a black man win. but alas, he is not, and he will not get my vote. party or no party.
as a matter of fact, in nov. i going to pretend obama took his name off the ballot, and vote for anyone else listed.

Posted by: jgaw | May 8, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

So first Obama says one thing and then the “team” clarifies. This guy is such an amateur. McCain is going to eat him alive unless the superdelegates do what they should do. The media has been pushing for Obama. It always happens when a new guy pops up. They get bored with the old names. That is a studied fact. For example they have pronounced that Obama survived the Wright fiasco but he only survived in the Democratic primary. Just wait until the Republican video ads showing Wrght and his cruel, hateful and cold sermon that blamed the US for the attacks and was delivered while the nation mourned, just after the attacks. Of course Obama has not survived this. The Republican ads will show Wright’s hatred in juxtaposition to Obama statements trying to cast Wright a serious and dangerous proponent of racism and hatred as just an “eccentric uncle”.. Hillary could not put out ads of this type but unless Florida and Michigan are counted and unless the supers do what they were set up to do this is coming. I wonder how many childern have been in Wright’s audience through the years.

Posted by: bruce | May 8, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

The arrogance and superiority of obama in the White House?
Think about this – A person who thinks he is so wonderful and great greeting a foreign dignitary at the white house while looking down his nose at him. Now that is certainly presidential – let’s not forget that in this scenario, lurks Jeremiah Wright in the background thumping his biblical sayings of how mistreated the blacks have been by the whites and what victims they are. All the while obama continues to look down his nose at his foreign visitors.

Posted by: Lou | May 8, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

SAD,sad sad sad….. Hillary lost you’ll all get over it soon!

Posted by: Joe | May 8, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

All Hail! The empty suited one has spoken.

Posted by: Mack | May 8, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

McCain will not be Bush II. What gets him in trouble with his conservative support is that he appeals to Democrats too. He looks more and more appealing to Hillary Democrats for sure.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

You all are laughable that say that Obama is weak…or that he can’t win.
Have you seen what McCain is campaigning on? All the same things Hillary started trying to campaign on plus…
spending a fortune on a war without an end…no healthcare plan besides a” big push for preventative medicine ” but no moneys really for it… overturning roe vs wade … letting the market take care of the economy and the mortgage/housing crisis…
and if America votes for him…peoples around the world are reporting that America has a choice…if they choose McCain …they learned nothing…and “buying American” will still be sinking in it’s popularity.
There is not a single issue besides screaming “9/11″ “terrorists” (which mcCain’s election would actually make stronger …and Hillary’s “Obliterate Iran with nuclear weapons” video)
You all make blue collar white middle americans out to be dumb. that they don’t know what got us here.
I grew up in blue collar white america…they are not dumb…protective yes…patriotic yes…most often hard-working but not dumb…

Posted by: dl | May 8, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Mr. Obama’s brillant statement today that “Hillary Clinton is qualified enough to be a Vice President” shows me that this guy is a BIG loser. She is more qualified that he is–is it because she is a woman! Woman can only be 2nd best. And he still does not get it when he says he will bring her supporters over to his side—-”Being President of the United Sates is all about character”. Stay in your radical church Obama with the new radical, foul mouth new pastor downing whites and Americans. I just can’t believe that America wants a leader that is just a good talker—talk is empty just like your gas tanks are going to be shortly.

Posted by: Anne | May 8, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Here we have a typical dems Presidential candidate in the making.

Posted by: a new name | May 8, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

I’ve been voting for the democratic party for as long as I remember. This time though, I will be casting my vote for M. McCain. The reason ? First of all, Obama hijacked the democratic primaries. Contrary to what he professed, this election was all about race. He brilliantly manipulated the voters in accusing his adversaries of being racists and dishonest. I find him hypocritical in his judgments and his behavior. To me, he and his wife are true students of pastor Whright. Secondly, his experience in politics is disarming. His naive attitude in regards to international politics is frightening. His approach to our nation’s economic and social problems are simplistic at best. America wake up !! This man is a phoney. Think twice before casting your vote for him.

Posted by: Paulus | May 8, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

obama like geo bush does not like to debate because he is not good at it.
why is he not good at it.
to debate something i think, you must have a good internal knowledge of your subject, and have a passion for defending what you believe to be so.
obama cannot speak without a prepared speech. i do not look forward to and will not watch obama and mccain debate.
i will not let every fiber of my being suffer through watching those fools up there tripping and stumbling their way through a debate, only to turn the tv off either howling with laughter asking what was that all about.
can you imagine the rest of the world tuning in to hear those two.
it was agonizing enough to watch the first gore/bush debate. no will will not go through that again.
everytime you listened to sen. clinton debate, we all learned something new, either about the working of the gov. or finding out something about the rest of the work. she runs circles around those two clowns.
so please obama-stick to your guns
no debates with mccain.

Posted by: jgaw | May 8, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

I believe both the Obama and Clinton camp know somethings we don’t.
My prediction is, the uncommitted SDs have already decided on Obama and have told both camps of their stance. However, their waiting till June 3 to make it official

Posted by: Vanessa | May 8, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Hillary Clinton has not lost..Obama has not won. To win you have to have a winning total of all votes and Obama has not. Many supers are holding back and others can change and Florida and Michigan may just get counted yet. Go Hillary. Do not accept VP and get your self associated with this actor. Script provided by Deval Patrick, Governor of Massachutes. If the truth about Obama had been known a couple of months earlier he would be behind so now that it is out why should we not go to the convention as maybe more is coming

Posted by: bruce | May 8, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

The first Tara card BO casted was on Joe Biden, on the day he announced his candidacy, for God sake, for praising him!
Joe Biden’s candidacy was trashed before it ever got started, for being accused of racism towards the Bo.

Posted by: a new name | May 8, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

I would never vote for McCain. He wants to continue the Bush economic plan. Plus we have the Supreme Court to think about.

Posted by: lisa | May 8, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Yikes! Obama clearly WILL BE the nominee, so you would think he could be gracious about letting Clinton exit on her own terms, without undue pressure.
Ultimately, if he wants my vote though, he will have put Hillery on the ticket as veep.

Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | May 8, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

We will see what happens. Right now he is acting as if he already won. He is signaling the end, and who thinks will be the nominee, unlike Clinton who keeps changing the bar, who also by the way rejected MI’s plan for the spilt in MI delegates.
If Clinton was in the lead she would do the same thing.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | May 8, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Hey dl….McCain will not raise your taxes stressing this economy more. He will keep this country safe, unlike Obama who wants to party with our enemies. Hillary or McCain ’08!!!

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Barack is brilliant- period. I’ve been wanting to remind everyone here, that there is no excuse for saying, “we don’t know who this person is”. Nonsense. There is a lot written about every detail of Barack’s life, and not just by him. He wrote the ‘Audacity of Hope’, and also ‘Dreams from My Father’, that detail his life, his family, motivations, flaws, mistakes, and his dreams for our country. He’s clearly devoted himself to lifting up the underclasses. He has in no way led a life of elitism. An authoritative and well-written biography called ‘Obama” was written by an objective journalist (David Mendell) who is widely regarded as a political writer for the Chicago Tribune. From reading Mendell’s book, I assure you that he is not an Obama lover, but he was hardl pressed to find any dirt on the guy, other than one thing- a touch of arrogance which is somewhat tempered now, but more often than not still surfaces enough to get him in trouble. He needs to learn to keep this ego in check. He is not unlike most black sports stars, like Tiger, Jordan, etc. Of course, Hillary and bill have healthy egos too. No doubt, you need some chutspah and self esteem to be an effective president, but you nedd to be able to connect with voters a little better to be the total package. Barack will do it, just watch. JFK had to make the same mistakes early in the process too. It is not just the man, it’s the movement, it’s us- it’s our desire for something better. We’re not fanatics, just dreamers, placing our bets on the candidate that most inspires us. this was the secret to the successes of both JFK and Reagan. The excitement on capital hill alone is palpable. He can’t lose against McCain- this guy is a winner with a great vision for America. Why not give him a chance. Please read these books before you say that no one knows anythng about him. Hillary may have been a good choice too, but she sure carried some baggage, and any vision of hope on her part was buried in her negative old-style attack politics. No one likes that- just look at the exit polls from PN and IN. A lot of voters liked her personally, but not the way she conducted her campaign. Her time may come some day, just not now. She needs to learn how to run a straight forward positive campaign, not a Rovian attack-style republican campaign. This was her downfalling.

Posted by: rco | May 8, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Did he consult and pray with Rev Wright before he made that pronouncement?

Posted by: Mack | May 8, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Ann—Your failed to mention the part when he said she was also qualified to be President. Please get over HRC’s loss and join us on Barack’s side.

Posted by: Nikole | May 8, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

why would sen. clinton want to be vp to obama? of course he would LOVE that because he needs her brain.
i am sick and tired of the people on tv who have nice cushy jobs, on tv trashing other people. while the backbone of this country suffers and goes further under.
sen. clinton should stay in this race, to continue to fight for the working class just to let obama and his crew know just how many more people who do not think he is capable and smart enough to be president.
as for me and my house we are paying off mort.,planting a garden, and downsizing, and hunkering down for the cold season we american’ are about to enter either with mccain or obama.
obama supporters are supporting him for president for all the wrong reasons.

Posted by: jgaw | May 8, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

OK Hillary supporters! We are trying to make sure that if Obama were to try to claim victory on May 20, that we all re-register on May 21 to either independent or Republican, your choice, just as long as the DNC knows we are not going to stay with a party that hijacks this election and throws the nomination to their Golden Child. It goes all the way to the convention floor per their own rules, they seat Florida and Michigan, or we bolt. If the party wants to go ahead and wash its hands of its traditional party base, per Donna Brazille, then lets see how well they do, how much money they raise, when we aren’t there to support their butts this election. Re register on May 21, let Obama know he does not have our votes, and the DNC know we do not appreciate the mess they have made of this entire election.

Posted by: jdona | May 8, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

“Barack is brilliant” someone just stated. He did not look brilliant in the last debate. When he was given a chance to explain some recent news stories about him he stuttered and hemed and sounded like he had a double dose of novacain. Hillary was asked hard questions also in that debate. No wonder Barack does not like debates. McCain has been in dozens of key debates and he is ready for prime time like Hillary. Go Hillary. Go to the convention.

Posted by: bruce | May 8, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

What I’d like to know is why is Barack so desperate to end this? It’s a DNC tie which is why we have superdelegates. To break the tie. If neither nominee reaches the winning number, the supers make the decision. That’s why they made that rule. Exactly for these types of races. But Barack doesn’t like the rules so he’s declaring himself the winner when clearly he is not. Silly Barack.

Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 8, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Seems to me Obama’s statement proves that he is arrogant and really doesn’t care about the American people voters. And he might have his name on the November ballot but he will not be moving into the White House–65% to 35% in favor of McCain

Posted by: Senior Citizen | May 8, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

First and foremost she has to be offered the VP don’t think that will happen.

Posted by: h | May 8, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

He’s as arrogant as ever..he just can’t help making these kind of remarks I guess. No matter, I will never vote for him under any circumstances anyway. By the way, where or where is Rev. Wright? I still say this whole thing was staged to give Obama a reason to cut him loose (in public), that is why the good Rev. is laying low now.

Posted by: dwc | May 8, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

I think Obama must offer Clinton the VP spot. Its by far the strongest ticket, and would instantly bring the party together.
He can go for someone else, but there really is nobody else who is as popular or high profile enough to address Obamas weaknesses with voters to guarantee is victory to the white house.
If he offers it to her and she declines, that is fine too. Or he offers her another position that she wants . He definitly needs to be nice to her . Blowing her off could very well cost him the white house.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 8, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

The DNC is irrevocably broken. They are so broken that they don’t even know what they stand for anymore. As a life long Democrat, I am dismayed that they no longer actually care about me until they need my vote, and then when we do vote, they don’t want to count the votes unless they say so. For all of the Obama supporters, remember when Howard Dean was an early favorite in the 2004 Presidential election, people raved about him, supported him unequivocally. We, however were fortunate that he did not become the Democratic nomination. Look at his leadership regarding the DNC, it speaks volumes as to what he might have done in the White House. Obama is also an un-tested, young, inexperienced Senator. There are many, many things that we do not know about him. Obama is not a unifyer for all of the people, he is a unifyer for African Americans and the young college kids, he will not be able to bridge the division within the party. He will simply fail in November.

Posted by: someonewhoknows | May 8, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

if offered she should turn the vp down.
why should she offer her smart capable self the help him.
she should not. he is not as smart as she is, and she should not be asked to help him.
it is about time he had to stand on his own.
he has been cut from the same cloth of geo bush.
two empty suits with really good and ruthless backers and handlers.
just as geo. bush he didn;t go looking for them and put the team together, they went looking for him. why him
he is green, and inexperienced. and they can get what they want done through him.
she should decline if offered the vp.

Posted by: jgaw | May 8, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

DWC-
Excellent point about Rev.Wright and Obama’s relationship.
Obama is a snake oil salesman.
Many Former Obama Voters are getting Voter’s Remorse.
Obama’s Pride will bring him down.

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 8, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

I guess you were too young to remember the Clinton presidency, Earl. The economy was humming along pretty good then.

Posted by: Mack | May 8, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

jgaw,
I agree with you 100%. If Hillary is offered the VP position, she should turn it down. Obama, I agree, has had the benefit of benefactors and mentors his whole life. Heck, he was president of the Harvard Law Review and did not even have a published paper!!!
Hillary is a brilliant woman. She should not be covering for a weak president. I think she can do far more good in the US Senate.

Posted by: countallthevotes | May 8, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

I Wonder if Barak and Michelle are secretly praying in the basement with Rev Wright again.
I will not vote for Obama under any circumstances either.
20 years with Wright was a deal breaker.
It’s Hillary or McCain…

Posted by: cindy in nc | May 8, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

It will be a fabulous ticket if McCain chooses Hillary as his Veep! They are good friends and will balance each other out and our country will be a winner!!
This is what America needs — a mix of republican and democrats — a way to bring the country together!

Posted by: Voter | May 8, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Mack, you missed the whole point..I was being sarcastic to show how stupid are those so called democrats who are planning to switch and vote for McCain if Obama is the nominee.

Posted by: Earl | May 8, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

He’s so arrogant. He’s going to turn off MILLIONS of voters with this stunt. What a loser. He’s going to make a fool out of himself…..

Posted by: Vickie | May 8, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Sure, vote for McCain and get more dumb wars and a continuation of economic policies that are putting people out on the streets every day.
Just because your precious Hillary can’t/won’t win either the nomination or general.
Hillary supporters voting against self interest? I thought that was just on the Religious Right…

Posted by: Christopher Albright | May 8, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Dont be afraid, Obama is for the America working force and not just for himeself or in a war because his father was almost killed. He is not for Blacks and he is not for white but he is for All The American People.You have my vote

Posted by: Special K | May 8, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

If the democrats ignore Hillary and go with Obama, the democratic party will become a party of African Americans. Maybe that is what they are looking for! It would have been so nice if Obama had waited his turn but he burned bridges and come November, he will become another wannabe!

Posted by: Voter | May 8, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

I’m voting for Obama in the GE.
I am sick of making the easy,
safe choice like Kerry & Gore.
Obama is long shot, I’ll admit.
But, if he loses, oh well. He is not a Bush or a Clinton. Win Win.
the Dynasties ended on May 8th, 2008.

Posted by: billy smith | May 8, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Christopher Albright,
Please show us where you get your information that McCain will start more “dumb wars”.
Of course you don’t have any information, you’re just resorting to politics of fear.
Do you see how you Obamamaniacs resort to the “old politics” when you need to?

Posted by: JA | May 8, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

If I were Obama, I would wait until after June 3 to make a victory speech like that. To do it sooner than that would be a negative for him.

Posted by: James | May 8, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

McCain will end the war honorably and so would Hillary. Obama will just look for ideas. We are already at war and we need to make sure that the troops are pulled out honorably. A man without experience who didn’t any work even though he led the Foreign relations sub-committee wants to lead the country now! I support Hillary — if she doesn’t win, it has to be McCain!

Posted by: Voter | May 8, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

It only shows you that he is an elitist! He wants to leave out FL and MI. Now he wants to declare win before the game is over.
It only shows his arrogance.
Wake up America. Vote for Clinton and send the boy Hussein back to his lunetic racist uncle Rev. Wright!

Posted by: Jim | May 8, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

It is less likely Obama will offer VP to Hillary. If so, Reps will use their own words to bite them from Dems’ primary (Hillary said Obama is empty hope and unqualified to be CIC and Obama said Hillary can’t be trusted and the same old politics..)
It will be the worst joint ticket…
Either candidate will find a new face as a run mate..
But how much the new face VP can make up the weakness from either candidate and beat McCain is a big question..

Posted by: True Truth | May 8, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Hillary for the little people. No mention of GAS TAX HOLIDAY for 2 days. What is the next pander fight?

Posted by: Bill C | May 8, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

The new math for the nomination.
Presidential nominee Barrak Obama =
President John McCain.

Posted by: Helen | May 8, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

I got your point. I was just making my point that the economy was good when the Clintons were in the White House. No one can deny that no matter who they support. I’d rather have Hillary with Bill as an advisor, than Obama with Rev Wright as an advisor.

Posted by: Mack | May 8, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

He misspoke right

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Clinton is surrounded by corporations & people attracted to political power. GW Bush has already put Bechtel into Iraq for a still unknown future, and had the US resume support of the brutal & corrupt Indonesian military; dose America really benefit from these old policies ? WW-II was a war the US had to be part of, but since then the Industrial Military Complex relays on old fashion fear – both the Cold War and the 9/11 attacks. The US can work towards a brighter future, or it can continue to live in fear building weapons to kill all the people it fears.
Which person as President could better guide the US?

Posted by: Andrew767 | May 8, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Billy Smith…you must be the gambling sort who loves a good trip to Vegas. Obama cannot win with only 26% of blue collar whites. They are a huge voting block, unlike the 13% African American and whatever irresponsible college kids show up (or don’t) in Nov. to vote for him IF he is nom.
As for those who want Hillary as VP…I don’t think so. Those who like Hillary could never vote BO, and I don’t want him to get the benefit of her walking him through it.
Now a McCain – Hillary team sounds great!

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Obama is going to declare himself president on May 20th. Why bother with a GE when his Chicago bosses already have the fix in for him? All Hail Barky!

Posted by: calli | May 8, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

The clocks run out! It’s over! Barack has won the nomination. What a historic occasion and it’s a shame that the Clintons are prolonging this thing. Hillary should step aside because she’s quickly becoming even more ridiculous than Huckabee!

Posted by: pundit01 | May 8, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Just like Bush did to Gore I guess he really is an elitist

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

For Obama to act like this further convinces me that he is egotistical and way off on how this will be received. If the Democrats want to jeopardize the race in November, all they have to do is put him up and I think it will happen!

Posted by: Two-cats | May 8, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

obama was in the capital today, acting like he’s mister washington already.
the audacity of that guy!

Posted by: jerome LA | May 8, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

and it is that caucasian blood in him tghe american part of him that he has tried to get rid of. read his book.
if he is with whites he is white, except with the typical white folks.
and he is never with the blacks but he says he is all black and that is all they need.
he will be anything you need him to be except a good president. that is not in him

Posted by: jgaw | May 8, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

C’mon guys and gals. Obama is far from perfect, just like HIllary. Pleae read the books about Barack before passing judgment. He is not a radical black activist, not a racist, he’s not anti-white (he’s half white!), he’s not muslim (he’s Christian), he did not name himself, he’s never trashed America, he’s not going to take us into nuclear war with Iran, he’s none of the things that Hillary and the repubs have convinced you that he stands for. Helping blacks and other minorities does not hurt other more fortunate democrats. You can’t equate him with a few of his more questionable associates, any more than you can equate Hillary/ BIll or McCain with a few of their associates. Please. There is a double standard that you hold for him, because you understandably feel passionately about your candidate. I understand, but none of it this character assassination of Obama is true. We know far more about Obama at this stage in th election process than we did about JFK, Bill Clinton, George Bush, or Ronald Reagan. Give Obama a break. The only thing controversial that Barack has said was the ‘Bittergate’ stuff which he said in private, but if you have been paying attention, you know by now that Bill Clinton once said almost the same thing, publicly, when he ran for president and received credit for his wisdom and understanding on the subject. These Obama attacks are just hateful fear-mongering republican-style politics that we need to distance ourselves from. We are not uninformed Obama nuts- far from it. We feel the same passion for our candidate as you do about yours.

Posted by: rco | May 8, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

billy smith ,It is only an illitrate who will reason like you do.Politics is a game of number that means majority,it is not only the blacks that are voting for Obama,it is only a fool who will turn around to vote for Mcain because Clinton did not win,that is not Democracy,nobody want to continue with war in Iraq,no job,no health insurance,educational disadvantage on and on.Lets respect the wish of majority

Posted by: Livi | May 8, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

OB will never be US president. Wait and see what the Karl Rove, and Rush Limbaugh are hiding for him after the nomination.
I guarantee it, he is very week, many more dirts to uncover. “The snow has not melted totally, to uncover the dirt”
The Patriot

Posted by: Tony | May 8, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Stop making stuff up. The agenda is too obvious.

Posted by: John Kovacs | May 8, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Jerome…you are dead on. I was thinking how great to read all the Hillary supporters on the blogs, but his paid bloggers are taking a vacation, because he’s preemptively announcing he’s the candidate. Wow…more arrogance.
He should take a humility lesson out of American Hero McCain’s playbook.
HILLARY OR McCAIN ’08!

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

So, who are the NEW kind of politics people supporting Obama? Let’s look at the list of past presidential Democratic candidates – that LOST:
George McGovern, Gary Hart, Ted Kennedy, Bill Richardson, Chris Dodd, John Kerry, and today Carter…..
My, my, my. Looks like the loser’s club of old politics are stumping to re-invent themselves behind Obama as bringers of NEW politics.
Why do I feel like I want to scream?

Posted by: Gabriele Droz | May 8, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Hillary has every right to stay in the race to pay off her debts, and set herself up to be considered for VP. We all understand. The superdelegates will eventually weigh in. Let’s be patient. It may be over, but there is absolutely no reason to show disrespect for Hillary, even if she has disrespected Obama at every turn in the process. She was the champion, and he was the challenger. She had every right to trash talk, and run her campaign in a negative way that was the most comfortable to her personally, whether some of us liked it or not. She is entitled to continue playing her hand, even if she doesn’t have the cards to win. I would encourage her supporters to send her money to pay off her debts. It’s the right thing for dedicated Hillary supporters to do under the circumstances.

Posted by: rco | May 8, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

well, he should do that….so i can finally give up on the dems. not going to vote for the bama.

Posted by: tony | May 8, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Jackie Robinson was a great ball player long before he broke the color barrier.He was a great person on and off the field.
What has Obama done for the black people, has he been a great senator? What has he done to make him a leader?
He is not real, just a front for some unseen backers pushing his buttons.
Wake up America!
Hillary a real leader!

Posted by: slokipoki | May 8, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Every time an Obama supporter calls anyone who supports Clinton uneducated, it just turns more of us off of ever voting for him. Believe it or not, a lot of us over the hill, stupid, and uneducated people actually went to college and (gasp!) earned a degree. I’d vote for Underdog before I would ever vote for Sen. Obama now, strictly because I have seen what kind of hateful and nasty people His Arrogance seems to inspire. “McCain/Clinton 08″ is looking better and better.

Posted by: dwc | May 8, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Simply every single US citizen should put your country first other than any political Party…
Vote for the one you think is the best to lead this country…
Vote by your heart not by the number!! That is your first right and obligation as a citizen!!

Posted by: True Truth | May 8, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

I just made another contribution to the Clinton campaign. I guess I want to make myself feel as if I have done something to not have to vote Republican in the fall. Of course I didn’t give all my money since I want to have some left to give to McCain if the Democrats do go to the far left again.

Posted by: joey in ga | May 8, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Not once has Obama ever said anything remotely close to “let’s blame whitey” for anything. He is not a black activist. He is a Christian patriot who embodies the spirit of the Democratic party. Attack him for being too liberal if you are so inclined, but these racial charges are so unfounded. “But his pastor said…”and he just sat there and listened”. When activist or racist words come out of Obama’s mouth, I’ll reconsider my support. That’s not what he’s about!

Posted by: rco | May 8, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

rco,
Obama is a “christian patriot?” What the heck is that?

Posted by: countallthevotes | May 8, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

rco…There you go. The only thing anyone can say about Obama that makes them want to vote for him is that he’s a good cheerleader. When did a cheerleader get to be QUALIFIED to be PRESIDENT of the greatest country on earth??? Nobody can say anything else that qualifies him. They like him and he MOTIVATES people. So do cheerleaders. Round up a few and see if they want to run independent as PRESIDENT AND VP. That’s how stupid this whole thing is. Throw a black in there as President and all the blacks will vote by color. RIDICULOUS!!! This MAN IS not qualified to be President. I know many people that feel the way I do. He will not get my vote. I live in Florida and we chose Hillary and Obama doesn’t want her to have the votes. I guarantee you if the shoe was on his foot he’d demand it and so would all of his supporters and the biased media. They have all treated Hillary so unfairly through this campaign it makes me sick. There is a drive to elect this man that nobody has vetted and I think is a danger to this country. I heard last night that Obama is going to have attorneys go with the police squad cars when there is a call of trouble involving black people. What I want to know does that go for Whites, Asians, Hispanics, Jews,etc. You know people of all races, nationalities, and color. If not, that’s racist. Then again after sitting in Wright’s church for 20 years I can see why. I still think Obama had that attitude before he went to Wright’s church according to the books he wrote. Then there’s Michelle. Oh yes, the FIRST LADY that hates America. Oh wait, That’s like Wright.

Posted by: carolyn | May 8, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Actions speak louder than words, and his ACTIONS supported the ideology of blame whitey buy staying in that church, and participating in that culture. Words are easy, actions tell the story

Posted by: actions | May 8, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Dream Ticket!

Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | May 8, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

i honestly don’t know where you got that interpretation from the video. i mean, if you listen, he was so careful to word his statements so as to be fair and considerate.
the implications of your title are so antithetical to the words he had with Brian Williams. he spent the entire segment saying that Hillary could come back, she has before, he wouldn’t take his front-runner position for granted even while his camp “obviously” felt good about Tuesday’s results, and when he mentioned that particular statement, he said “MAKE the CLAIM” that “we’ve won” — i.e., not declare as fact, but argue for it.
you can take issues with the fact that he’ll argue for it on May 20th, but to state that he will definitively “declare” to win before winning in total disregard for rules or the legitimate process just gives off a vibe and impression to your readers that was not at all present in either his words or attitude in that segment with Brian Williams.
some reporting that is.

Posted by: Dawn | May 8, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Declaring victory this early seems extremely egotistical and arrogant. Hillary Clinton hasn’t resigned, and I hope she doesn’t!

Posted by: Rhys | May 8, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

True Truth .If you went to school and got a degree,then you should understand what is politics.Politics is a game,no winner, no vanquished,the hatred you people have over Obama when majority is voting for him is no more politics but war,that is why that person you are refering is calling some people illitrate because some people allow passion to override their senseof puberty.Lets stop calling people name and face the fact,Clinton has a good pyrpose,Obama has a good purpose,if majority says it is Clinton lets join hands as democrats and vote for Clinton,if they said that it is Obama,lets join hand and vote for him,your passion and hatred is childish.WE are all demcrats with the same purpose.Name calling is Republican strategy,nobody criticises Mcain Pastor,the contributors and associates of otrs,lets be wise

Posted by: jackson | May 8, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

joey in ga,
Glad to see you are contributing to Hillary. What a great idea! I, too, will save some money for McCain in the fall, just in case Obama is the nominee. Many MA Democrats are already planning stickers for the worse case scenario: MA DEMS for MCCAIN!!

Posted by: countallthevotes | May 8, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I pledge that Hillary will get my vote in November, whether its by pulling a lever, clicking a button or writing in her name for President. Obama does not deserve it.
Hillary is my nominee, no matter what. I

Posted by: AM | May 8, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

There is nothing ABC news can do to stop Sen. Clinton from becoming President. About three years ago a well known televangelist, Perry Stone Jr., told his congregation that God spoke to him and said Sen. Clinton will be the next President. This information can be obtained from one of his published works on CD entitled “Strange Patterns of Recent American Presidents.” On track 7 of this CD, he tells us that Sen. Clinton will once again be in the White House. So give it up ABC News. And Barack, your days are numbered.

Posted by: brianerickson65 | May 8, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Tick…Tick…Tick….The sound of time-bomb Obama….seemingly innocent and definitley eloquent…. until the REAL Obama surfaces to begin his assault on the country for holding down the minorities for too long…. crusading for the “victim mentality” crowd!!!

Posted by: Mark | May 8, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

carolyn, you are exactly correct, but you must remember that cult leaders can talk their followers into ANYTHING, even if it kills them. All it takes is charisma; and that is what will elect Obama. It doesn’t MATTER if he has no “substance”.

Posted by: Rhys | May 8, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

jackson,
Why are you so childish? I pledged US citizen to vote by their heart but by the number – the old same politics.. it is the exact what Obama campagned…
The new face of politics is from people’s heart not from political number!!
Go back to your own school!!

Posted by: True Truth | May 8, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Hillary should put her country first before her party and should not abandon her supporters – a large enough group to form a new party. I for one will be extremely disappointed if she eventually takes the VP bait.

Posted by: esvida | May 8, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

I voted for Bill Clinton, twice, and Al Gore and John Kerry. But this time, I’ll be voting for John McCain. I’m not mad at anyone but I don’t, and never will, trust Obama. 20 years of listening to Wright is the wrong stuff!

Posted by: Charlie35 | May 8, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Jackson,
What you don’t seem to understand is that many people are switching from Clinton to McCain NOT because they hate Obama, but because this man is inexperienced and, ironically, has to much baggage at this point (even though he is “green”).
In fact, I personally shudder at the thought of Obama as commander-in-chief. That’s a scary thought.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 8, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

actions.Obama is an intellectual,the most inllectual of all the Presidential cadidates.He has been a fighter for others in Chicago and He will be the best President America will,Americans are waiting for President Obama,the world all over including the great Britain is waiting

Posted by: Ashawo | May 8, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Brian Erickson, be careful bad-mouthing ABC. I’ve been censored on other message boards for doing so; you don’t even have to use profanity! But I’ll take a chance again and express my disappointment with ABC’s anointing of the “New Messiah” (Obama). The media (not just ABC) easily knocked Ron Paul out of the Republican race, and now they’re going after Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: Rhys | May 8, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Obama is the MC Hammer of politics.

Posted by: Tom NYC | May 8, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

i sense some bitterness amongst fellow democrats, especially hillary supporters, im sure y’all will get over her loss soon and get behind the nominee.

Posted by: may the best win | May 8, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Rhys, I think that Obama’s cult status has been killed for most people, with the exception of college kids.
A lot of people I speak to who used to think Obama was a different type of politician now think of him as just another politician.
Come November, McCain will destroy Obama. It won’t even be close. Many white people are now backing off support of Obama. Look at the recent polls. Yes, he won NC by a wide margin because NC Dems are 30-40% black. And, in fact, I think that people will start to be bothered by the fact that black people are supporting him 92%, and there will be a backlash (all of this in the context of Wright’s racist rants).
The election is set. McCain is your next president. War hero, will give the VP slot to Romney (checkmark on the economy edge), stronger on national security, more of a centrist Republican (doesn’t believe in torture, is more practical about the exit strategy in Iraq, etc.).
It is clear as day – barring some unforseen scandal, which is extremely unlikely given he was vetted in 2000 and since.
Expect ads to run 24/7 about Obama’s “friendship” with Ayers, dealings with Rezko, 20 year relationship with an anti-American and racist pastor…….
Try to deny it as you will, this election is set.

Posted by: JA | May 8, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Doesnt anyone else feel REALLY uncomfortable with the Obama we’ve seen so far?? When will he show us his true self?? When will another “questionable” association pop up!??

Posted by: Mark | May 8, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

What has Hillary done that so qualifies her to be president, lived in the white house. The constant yap about her greatness is premature since she hasn’t even been able to win the presidency despite worldwide name recognition and a ton of cash. I say before we make Hillary Clinton day a national holiday let her accomplish something that benefits america, not just her family first.

Posted by: fool me once | May 8, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Somebody needs to tell the “Rock Star” that he won’t have the required 2025 pledged delegates on May 20th. Oops! That’s right, when Obama loses, he wins. And if Obama does not have the required number of pledged delegates, he will say he wins anyway, accuse Hillary of cheating, accuse Hillary and her supporters of racism, and then threaten riots in Denver if he doesn’t get the nomination. And if that doesn’t work then he can always have his “friends” from Chicago come and pay the superdelegates a visit to “convince” them that Obama is THE ONE! Obama will then declare the convention a waste of time, and then declare himself president, as it is obvious that old man McCain will never beat him in a GE.

Posted by: frisco girl | May 8, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

may the best win —- I dont think so…lots of hard feelings out there, I think a lot of people feel McCain is closer to Hillary than Obama is!!! He is SOOOOO far left he will have a hard time holding the party together! And sooner or later, he will make a mistake and let his true self be known!!

Posted by: Mark | May 8, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

I think Obama should be removed from his senate seat. He should not even be a candidate, let alone senator. He’s ridiculed people for their beliefs in constituional rights like religion and guns, he’s supposed to protect them not ridicule them – he’s pathetic – get him out of not only the office – the country

Posted by: richardm | May 8, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

The drastic change in the press reports indicates that he is the winner, not the leader, but winner.
The hand writing is on the wall,l just a matter of time bfore it is read.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | May 8, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Hey
may the best win
=======================
White mainstream democrats DO NOT VOTE
for a left wing liberal.
McCain ’08

Posted by: Nicholas | May 8, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Obama — Don’t count your chickens before their hatched!! If one more skeleton comes out of your closet, it could be doomsday for you!!!!

Posted by: Mark | May 8, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

RCO…how DO you know BETTER than anyone else that Obama is not a black supremacist? It wouldn’t surprise me. Think about the things Michelle believes and “typical white person” referring to his grandmother. Take into consideration the words he has written in his two books. That’s an eye opener.

Posted by: carolyn | May 8, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Obama and David Axelrod are the Milli Vanilli of politics.

Posted by: calli | May 8, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Obama is a fashion trend. he has not stood the test of time. He needs to go back to congress and clean up his own distict of south Chicago it is in a terrible state. I am not willing to gamble on this country’s future.

Posted by: Tom NYC | May 8, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

He sure is full of himself.

Posted by: Florida Cat | May 8, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Don’t get cocky Obama — One more gaff and your through —The list just keeps getting longer —–Rev. Wright, Frank Davis, Tony Resko, William Ayers, Larry Sinclair, Nadhmia Auchi….where will it end?

Posted by: Mark | May 8, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Jay, just to correct you. Barack Obama did not vote for the war because he was not in senate at the time to be able to. Also, at that time Obama stated that he didn’t know for sure how he would have voted. Additionally, at one point (when the war was going well) he said that he and Bush see eye to eye on Iraq.
Please do your homework. Experience CERTAINLY matters when you’re running for president. To have NONE is downright scary.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 8, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Ja,
I was joking about questioning democracy thing. But the rest of the world sees us as dumb. We can vote for who you want. But a majority of the people on this thread are generally democratic. (or not republicans at least.) But some people on here claim to be democratic but are so blatently racist that they won’t vote for a black man. (by the way, he is half white everyone.)
To be honest with you, I would be very happy with either candidate. The things they say are only to separate each other and to appear different. they are both pretty liberal democrats. Sen. Clinton is plenty to the left. Working class Americans support her because they remember what Pres. Clinton did for the lower and middle class.
There really isnt a whole lot of difference in the two politically. Both are inexperienced. (and living in the white house does not qualify you to be elected to live there.) The only difference in the two is their race and gender.

Posted by: Discouraged American | May 8, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

hey nicholas,
its about unifying the party and taking back the white house from the republicans. if hillary wins the nomination, im definitely rooting for her, same to obama.

Posted by: may the best win | May 8, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Let the people of Florida and Michigan have their say in this process, OBAMA! DNC and who ever else is yanking are chains out there.

Posted by: Tom NYC | May 8, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Am I the only one who remembers Monkey Business.

Posted by: hold your horses | May 8, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Wrong again ABC NEWS AS ALL WAYS THE NUMBER IS 2025, and obama won Texas as well.

Posted by: Jay | May 8, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Dean and Pelosi will be the two
crying babies after november 4th.
The majority of americans already spoke.
They don’t like Obama.
Majority=Republicans+White democrats.
McCain ’08

Posted by: Nicholas | May 8, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Only 41% of the caucuses were counted in Texas. Because there is signs of foul play. Obama supporters would not let Clinton supporters into the buildings.

Posted by: Tom NYC | May 8, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

nicholas:
i wonder what you mean by white democrats. if clinton is that great, why is she still behind in every aspect of this nomination process? dont tell me its all down to black votes, because that will be really stupid thing to say.

Posted by: may the best win | May 8, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Hahawrong,
Thank you for the math lesson. I have heard all the statistics. Obama wins with black voters the same way Hillary wins with everyone that isnt black. I am hispanic, and for some reason, most hispanic americans vote for Hillary because they also generally will not support Obama.
For the most part, no one listens to policy. People have already made their decisions before any politician even starts with what they would do when they are president.
By the way, I live in suburban Georgia. Everyone’s mind around here is already made up. Same in Miss., NC, Ark. I know exactly how the voting and party groups break down in the south. No democrat is going to win a state down here anyway.

Posted by: Dem | May 8, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Why do so many people need to explain that they are not poor and uneducated before expressing their point of view, if you say something intelligent it’s obvious. Remember Obama never said Hillary’s supporters were uneducated that’s the media who beats that drum.

Posted by: fool me once | May 8, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

ah, but DEM, that is where you are wrong! Clinton could pull off some of the states. Arkansas, the working middle class whites would flock to her. Mississippi, Florida, maybe even Alabama. Also, Indiana and Ohio. She can pull states that Obama can’t, because she didn’t offend white working class voters. It isn’t about black, it is about what he said and did, and who he associated with.

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

rco…Ayers, Wright, Rezko, Hamas, Auchi, etc. All good reasons not to vote for Obama. Add his racist wife and the fact that he doesn;’t have a clue about how to run the country…just why are people voting for a cheerleader?

Posted by: carolyn | May 8, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Do we really want to discuss electability? I agree, Obama is probably not electable, but its not because of his policies. Same with Clinton. She is just barely more elecable, if any.

Posted by: Discouraged American | May 8, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Screw Florida and Michigan… next time follow the rules…
You can’t speed and then cry when you get pulled over for a ticket… pay the ticket and don’t speed again..

Posted by: Lawrence | May 8, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Voters Remorse from all who voted for Obama……. there’s going to be a landslide…
YES WE MC CAIN
YES WE MC CAIN

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 8, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

What makes you think Hillary would win in Arkansas? Gore didnt win Tennessee. That state is very conservative. It will be the the closest southern state, but she would be hard pressed to even pull that one off.

Posted by: Dem | May 8, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Rules? We don’t need no stinking rules. Like good old time politics we are gonna pick this one in the back room at the convention. Think the rules are a big thing. Bull. The DNC created the rules and they can modify them if they want. If one candidate looks like there is something in his past that makes him totally un-electable. The Republicans concieved the Florida date change. They control both bodies in Tallahassee. We are suffering from a Republican action. Email the DNC. Click on “contact” and tell them how important it is to count Florida where Obama, though he was on the ballot, lost by close to 300.000 votes.

Posted by: bruce | May 8, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Hey Thinking,
It’s not the press that chooses the winner, it’s the voters, Democratic voters. Watch Obama get crushed in West Virginia and Kentucky and see if their tone changes. I’ll admit it’s a long shot, but if she can pull in Oregon she still has a case to be made.
Keep your fingers crossed that Jeremiah Wright keeps his mouth shut. I don’t think he can or will.
========================================
Obama and Bittergate, we shall not forget!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 8, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Has it ever occurred to any of you that WE ARE ALL ON THE SAME SIDE. Republicans… Democrats… Blacks… Whites… Women… and Men. All of us are Americans. When those towers fell we were ALL affected. When are we going to stop fighting amongst ourselves long enough to find the man that ordered the killings of thousands of our brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, aunts, uncles, and cousins.

Posted by: Jamal William Edwards | May 8, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

lawrence:
well said…i cant say it any better. screw them!!!

Posted by: may the best win | May 8, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Come on folks – why do you insist black voters have to ‘split’ their vote between Clinton and Obama for it not to be racist?
Why does everyone assume the white people who didn’t vote overwhelmingly for Obama are not racist?
Black voters had no choice but to vote 100% for the white candidate in the past and you weren’t whining then about racism were you.
If people believe one candidate is better than the other they will vote for them. It appears there was a difference of opinion and there happen to be a very large number of variables that impact choices.

Posted by: mcgreen | May 8, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Dem, it isn’t the “same way”. She doesn’t win ANY demographic 90-10. As important as the blacks are, they are not the block that will swing an election

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

mcgreen…blacks ONLY voted for white then because a black wasn’t on the ticket. As soon as there is a black running for President, 92% have voted for the black candidate. Policy and his shady character and friends haven’t made a difference to you.

Posted by: carolyn | May 8, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

I believe the fact that Obama can win 40% of the white vote while being pummeled by the press is impressive, also come election time I think most white democrats and independents will come around and realize he’s a solid candidate especially when put beside McLame’s corpse. After all there’s too much at stake in this election to continue being petty.

Posted by: fool me once | May 8, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Here is the reality, folks. I am a lifelong Democrat. In over 40 years I have never voted for a Republican, for anything. All of a sudden, Sean Hannity and Karl Rove are making more sense than the MSM, which has long been in the tank for Obama.
The extent of the loss that Obama will suffer if he is the nominee will be historic.
The Obama campaign has been playing the race card from day one, in order to agitate their base of Black voters. This has worked so far, but it is a dangerous game. That Obama is the Black candidate is a fact. The Democratic leadership is afraid to even admit Obama is Black, but when someone gets 92% of the Black vote, he is the Black candidate.
The Republicans are not going to worry about pointing out the obvious. They are not going to worry about being called racist. They will turn it right back on Obama. They will point out that his campaign is been steeped in racism as a way of agitating Black voters to turn out for Obama.
Republicans are going to scare the bejesus out of Southern and middle American Whites with visions of General Obama leading his Black army to take their homes, their jobs, and their women.
Obama could have avoided this if his supporters had not pressured Black voters and Black congressmen to support him. He said he wanted to be post-racial, but his campaign has been hyper-racial. If his nomination ends up fomenting a race war it will be on his head.

Posted by: David H | May 8, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

lawrence, I wonder if you will feel the same way when Obama loses FL. in Nov.

Posted by: Florida voter | May 8, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Lawrence…if you could only vote when your state told you to, would you vote and hope that it got straightened out later? That’s what we thought. How can they deny our vote that was set by the Republicans. We thought it would be straightened and given to the winner!!!

Posted by: carolyn | May 8, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

the reason I say she could win AR and other southern states is because she could pull a few of thoes “reagan” democrats back. She MAYBE can, he CAN’T. THAT is why I still want her in it, and I want her as the nominee. he can’t win the white house

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Richarm…I agree. Obama should be stripped of his senate seat. There are so many reasons.

Posted by: carolyn | May 8, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

We disgusted anti-Obama Democrats do have a choice — we can support McCain in November. Can you stomach the idea of having to work with these self-righteous Obama jerks during the campaign? If McCain wins Obama will be totally finished, like Kerry. McCain will be too old to run in 2012, paving the way for Hillary to claim the presidency.
MCCAIN IN 2008!!!
HILLARY in 2012!!!!
OBAMA BACK TO POLITICAL OBVLIVION!!!

Posted by: Political Realist | May 8, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Several Obama supporters have stated that their candidate is BRILLIANT. So is fool’s gold and is more valuable.
McCain or Clinton in November.

Posted by: 74 & Holding | May 8, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

HaHawrong: Obama did offend many small town working class voters…but today Hillary stated a fact about white voters and I’m sure she’ll be vilified for it. But what she is saying about a huge voting block IS TRUE. She will be accused of being racist (we know she and Bill are not)….but what’s more racist than 92% of the black vote going to Obama. Some voters may not vote for him because of color….but I truly believe most voters(like myself) who can’t vote for him are doing so because of all his negatives….not his brown skin. IT’S HIM WE DON’T LIKE.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

I think before Senator Obama declares himself the winner he shouls wait a while more to see if the right thing gets done and Florida and Michigan get counted…Florida has the fourth highest number of electoral votes after N.Y.,Calif. and Tx.. Here are the results of the Florida primary where both Obama and Hillary were on the ballot and neither campaigned. There were some ads that ran there from Obama and Hillary and others due to Satellite TV, it could not be stopped.–TOTALS–Clinton 870,986–Obama 576,214–Edwards 251,562–Biden 15,704–Richardson 14,999–Kucinich 9,703–Dodd 5,477–Gavel 5,275..

Posted by: bruce | May 8, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

momo…It wise to support the Republican candidate if Hillary loses. To support Obama is to lose all the way around. We would lose our country.

Posted by: carolyn | May 8, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

carolyn:
there is nothing racist about obama winning NC. majority of hillary supporters in PA are whites, and obama supporters in NC are blacks, whats the issue here?

Posted by: may the best win | May 8, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Debra,
I just heard an Obama talking head on FOX calling Hillary a racist for exactly that reason. I guess you simply can no longer say black or white without being called a racist. You can no longer just describe the facts without being called a racist. Ignoring race as an important facor in these primaries and the ultimate GE is downright foolish.

Posted by: countallthevotes | May 8, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

carolyn and debra:
your candidate (hillary) is not good enough, thats why she is behind on delegate count and popular.

Posted by: may the best win | May 8, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

I didn’t know what all the bluster was about May 20th and how he plans to announce his victory based on a new number. I just read this:
“Obama will not reach the 2,025 magic number on May 20. Rather, on that date he is all but certain to hit a different threshold–1,627 pledged delegates, which would constitute a winning majority among the 3,253 total pledged delegates if Florida and Michigan are not included. ”
So the magic number is 2209, 2025 or 1627 or whatever anybody feels like saying since the DNC is taking a long walk off a short plank into shark filled waters and has been for many months.
A train wreck of their own design. Lovely.

Posted by: countallthevotes | May 8, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

exactly. This is just basic math. Obama has turned off the swing vote. Maybe in about 8 years he can clean up his act. As for now, if he wins the nom, McCain will be president. And no…I will not vote for McCain. Maybe an independent, I’ll have to do some research.

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Hey: may the best win
======================
White democrats ARE NOT like the black
democrats.
Blacks,and left wing activists democrats
control the agenda on caucuses.
Here what happened in my home state.
I went to vote for Hillary.They told
to coma back at 7pm for the delegates.
I went back at 7 pm and i couldn’t
get in.The place it full of blacks.
Fight broke out.Hillary won the popular
vote but Obama got more delegates.
Tell me if it’s right.Whites were gone
and blacks were there all night long.
That’s explain to me why Obama got more
delegates.
Very undemocratic system.
I will vote for John McCain in
november.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 8, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

not good enough? or caucas states should have had real elections that people with jobs and families could participate in. Or Obama supporters should not have interfered with Clinton supporters in Texas…not good enough. What a joke. Why do you want a nominee who will lose the General? You are a repub, right? that has to be it.

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

maythebestwin…No your candidate is not good enough. He will not win in November. I don’t think he will ever be President.

Posted by: carolyn | May 8, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Many of you believe that the Hillary supporters are simply bad sports and throwing tantrums by declaring they would vote for McCain instead of Obama. I am a Hillary supporter that would vote for McCain, not because I am a bad sport and throwing a tantrum but rather because I truly believe that McCain would be a better choice over Obama. I do not hold to steadfast party support,I support the candidate that I believe would be better. Perhaps if people truely voted for the best candidate based on experience, content, and issues and not along party of emotional lines, we would not be in this mess.

Posted by: someonewhoknows | May 8, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

hey nicholas:
what a painful experience u had….but like i said in my previous post, its nothing to be bitter about, whoever the nominee is, be it hillary or obama, im supporting them, afterall they both have similar policies, compared to the the warmongering mccain.

Posted by: may the best win | May 8, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

My back up candidate…John McCain was great on O’Reilly today. I only feel bad that he will have to tippy toe around anything that appears racial. I would have rather watched McCain and Hillary duke it out at debates. That would have been must see TV. Think of the close race…one a little left of center and one a little right of center. Now we have radical lefty (presuming BO gets it) and McCain can’t play fair or possibly be called racist for any spotlight on Obama’s character, pastor, or wife’s comments. What a shame.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Carolyn
- you decided to not respond to my question and just claim that Obama knows some shady characters. You need to read up on the shady characters that Clinton knows, she has certainly had more years to be at it and that explains the large numbers. It’s part and parcel of the fund raising process unfortunately that is required to get elected.
I saw the results in Iowa where white people overwhelming supported Obama over Clinton. Do you want to claim they are reverse racists for not supporting Clinton?
Why hasn’t Clinton won any demographic with some of the percentages Barack has? Is it because he is the better candidate? I think so.
This whole argument about race being an issue has been a red herring drummed up by the media. Race will always be an issue for some people and it’s foolish to not admit it cuts both ways.
Even racists deserve their candidate and it’s not for any of us to claim their vote is unfair.
And this whining about Obama unfairly winning due to black voters is nothing but whining pretty obviously since black people are only !!! 12% !!! of the population.
If Clinton can’t win more of the black vote then maybe just maybe it’s her fault instead of playing the victim card.
I’m an older white female voter who thought we had two great candidates but that Obama is more prepared to meet the challenges of the future.
And I am sick to death of zero sum mentality – I’m ready for a president with Barack’s approach.

Posted by: mcgreen | May 8, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Obama is an arrogant hypocrite. Mark Salter of the McCain has his number. Here is an excerpt from Salter’s memo today:
To: Interested Parties
From: Mark Salter, Senior Advisor
Date: May 8, 2008
Re: Senator Obama’s Attack Today
First, let us be clear about the nature of Senator Obama’s attack today: He used the words ‘losing his bearings’ intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain’s age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.
We have all become familiar with Senator Obama’s new brand of politics. First, you demand civility from your opponent, then you attack him, distort his record and send out surrogates to question his integrity. It is called hypocrisy, and it is the oldest kind of politics there is.
I hated it when he pulled this sort of crap with Clinton. It is no more appealing against McCain.
I’m a life long democrat, but I would not vote for Obama if he were the last candidate on earth.
Democrats and Republicans–Unite Against Obama!!!!

Posted by: NJH | May 8, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

To mcgreen | May 8, 2008 9:55:01 PM
Your argument has made the mistake of being overgeneralization.
There are many incidents the reverse discrimination exist. You only point out something that happened in IOWA state to dispute many other incidents that reverse discrimination exist. White voters voting for OBAMA tells us that racism do not generally exist in IOWA and for white voters there. Nothing more than that.
To generalise that reverse discrimination do not exist fouls all logic.
For many things OBAMA said shouldn’t and be forgiven, in other cases people were unfairly framed with ‘racism’
OBAMA the racists will backfire.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 8, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Obama’s cockiness is a big turn-off. Let him declare victory today, if he wants. In truth, he’s a loser and John McCain will be the next President. As a Hillary supporter, who has watched the vicious treatment of Hillary by the press, I am amazed that she has achieved the success she has. The press has “given” the nomination to Obama. And the Hillary supporters, enraged by the unfair, sexist treatment she’s been given (let’s see how many times has the press gleefully written her obituary…) will give the Presidency to John McCain! And I, for one, can’t wait. Let the games begin!

Posted by: dwilson | May 8, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

12% of the over-all population is not 12% of the democratic primary vote. That is problem one. Tampering with the Clinton supporters in Texas is problem 2. Caucases in general are problem 3. They will always be scewed agains the working, middle class with families who don’t live in the cities. Obama is a fake candidate, in a fake election, and when he loses the GE, it will become very real.

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

To McGreen: There is mounting evidence of Obama supporters committing caucus fraud. Looks like Iowa was in the bag before it was even finished, but more and more stories are coming out about incidents in Texas and other caucus states about dirty tricks and intimidation and outright fraud used by Obama supporters. Plus, there is evidence of precinct violations in the IN primary. Obama’s so called lead in pledged delegates is really becoming questionable.

Posted by: calli | May 8, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Jane, great point, I was thinking the same thing. I do think that Hillary will bow out after the Kentucky primary. Obama will go on to win in Nov. by a Landslide. These people that say they will vote mccain when Obama is the candidate are really just limbaugh-republicans that would vote for mc-more-war anyway. Why do these people listen to a drug-addict? Obama 2008!!!

Posted by: pt | May 8, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Take heart. Obama may not make it. He only needs one more item to be discovered and the Supers will start switching. Hillary should hang until the last dollar and the DNC should come to their senses and admit they made a mistake in the Florida and Michigan situation. I emailed them (DNC Click on “contact us”) today and told them after many donations and votes for that I was fed up and going to go Independent if they did not allow Florida and Michigan to vote. Howard Dean blew his own campaign by screaming like a nut. Let us not allow him to blow this important race. It is your kids futures at stake. Do the email.

Posted by: bruce | May 8, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

calli, sounds like you have been listening to talk-radio too much also. Take a good look at Obama and you will see that he is the real-deal. He’s honest, hard-working, and will do a great job cleaning up the mess of the bush-league. I think it’s great that his campaign has been funded by ordinary citizens unlike most other candidates. Obama 2008!!!

Posted by: pt | May 8, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

OBAMA is counting the chicken before it hatches for good reasons.
He is having the backup of the communist party like Pelosi, Carter, Dean, Joe Andrew, Richardson…
They control the communist party and believe that they can make new rules for him to get the nomination.
Any way you see him; it is a very presumptuous snob.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 8, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

haha,
you are just practicing the same thinking Barack says has to end if we are to make any progress. and, the US is sorely in need of making progress.
Everyone who votes for your candidate isn’t driven by perfect motives and everyone who votes for the other candidate driven by evil.
There are racists on both sides. There are people with excellent ideals on both sides. One candidate will come out ahead and will be challenged to pull together the ideals from BOTH candidacies.

Posted by: mcgreen | May 8, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

bruce, GET REAL. Carter came out today and said that FL & MI can’t be counted. He has been all over the world to mediate elections so you can forget about these 2 states that went against the rules, even though it was the GOP that forced FL to move the date up illegally. Man, FL is really getting a reputation for screwing up elections aren’t they. Obama 2008!!

Posted by: pt | May 8, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Barrack is against my logic? the how can we win the white house logic? The how can every vote count logic? Maybe the lets be on the lookout for a media created candidate who appeals to kids and blacks, knowing they will swing the Dem nomination, but won’t the GE logic? I bet he is against my logic. I want a DEM president. A black, white, green, I don’t give a rats tail end. Obama can’t get it done. His fault for his associations and comments. I admit this was fueled by the media, but he still made the mistakes, and they will cost him the GE. Give me a friggin candidate that can WIN the GE. It is not about who can win the most liberal activists(caucas voters) or the most blacks (a la NC). The big, swing voting block is White Working class voters. That is not a big factor in the dem nominating process. it is THE big factor in the GE.

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Obama’s victory from NC will not last long. If he win the nominee, his poll number will drop free fall quickly for McCain. Hillary’s supporter will switch to McCain and against Obama.
It does not matter if you are a Democrat or Republican, just go for McCain if Hillary loses the nominee. Otherwise you will live in hell for next four years.

Posted by: Kevin P | May 8, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Kevin P, why would dems vote republican. We have too much to lose like the Supreme Court. McCain will only make the economy worse, if that’s even possible. And then we have this god for saken war.

Posted by: Emily | May 8, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Carolyn – You blame the FL and MI issues on the Republicans, yet will vote for one if Hillary doesn’t get the nomination? That doesn’t make sense to me. If this is two different Carolyn’s posting, my apologies.

Posted by: fivepin | May 8, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

If Obama wants to win this why doesn’t he just go to WV and KY he can’t close the deal.

Posted by: Bishop | May 8, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Something I honestly don’t know…..the AA voters have defended their 90%+ percentage of vote for Obama in the Democratic (and most black folks are Democrats) elections by saying the AA’s have been voting for white folks forever, and it’s not about the color of his skin. Have there been white Democratic candidates, throughout the history of America, where any white Democratic candidate has received such overwhelming support from the AA’s in the Primary Democratic elections?

Posted by: PGHPAVOTER | May 8, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

doh!! Carter said it…it must be so… This is not rocket science. You want a Dem President? Pick a nominee who can win the white house. Please, show me how you can do that without Fl or MI, not to mention Ohio, Indiana, Arkansas. Penn will still go blue, as will the usual blue states. the swing states are what make the election. Obama fails there, Clinton does not.

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

The talking-heads were as giddy like apes! Oh, my goodness─ this “madness” or the “frenzy” that seized the media people after Sen. Obama’s win in North Carolina reminds me of the same madness and the flag-waving frenzy that seized us as we marched into Baghdad. It’s sobering to remember these are for the most part the same media people who cheered us to quagmire in Iraq, now doing the same song and dance thing for Sen. Obama. Some of it Sen. Obama deserves but most of it done with such vulgarity and such gaudiness, if I were Sen. Obama I would cringe, for their poor taste, believe me you don’t want some of this people to adore you with their lop sided praise. But on the whole, I am afraid for sake of our country, what’s ahead for us! What I fear is that when people are acting so irrational and when their reasoning and logic is so lopsided, usually there’s a big let down or a tragedy is around the corner! The American media has become a fertile ground for most irrational observers. I don’t know where you find these people come from or where they were educated. The way they spin things! While they spin out of control, they forget there are several sides to an issue or an event. Soberness and good judgment has gone out of fashion and replaced by fantasy and image consciousness. What a prescription for a tragedy of Shakespearean proportions. The irrationality of the media is a terrible tragedy for the whole country. Sen. Obama has still a way to go to secure his nomination by getting the necessary number of delegates, which he can’t. He needs super delegates as much as Sen. Clinton does. And long before the contest was even half-way over one talking-head after another started asking Sen. Clinton to drop out! Sen. Obama’s win in North Carolina gave him a chance to look good in the aftermath of a long losing streak of most important states like Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania. It was obvious that N. Carolina vote was primarily along the racial lines. 92% of Black Americans voting for Sen. Obama but 40% white voters. But I am astonished by the rather vulgar exaggerations and hype of the media to make it look like the nomination race is over, when Sen. Obama has not even reached the needed number of delegates! For example Lee Cowen of NBC upgraded “North Carolina” to the category of a major battle-ground state, last night! Sen. Obama again lost the Reagan Democrats. And without them he can’t obviously win the White House, along with working class Americans even if he’s the nominee. That’s how desperate these media people are to promote Barack Obama, and spin even a rather many sided event into “a big deal” for Sen. Obama. And at the same time even big deal for Sen. Clinton get slighted and dismissed. All Democrats should support Sen. Clinton just to demonstrate the fact we don’t tolerate such unfairness in a democracy such as ours! Remember these are the same people who took us over the cliff in Iraq because of their short sighted view of what they were reporting. I like to invite the readers to go to Real Clear Politics. com and do their own research and find out what’s really going on. If you take major battle ground states, such as Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan Sen. Clinton is doing much better against John McCain than Sen. Obama. Sen. Obama may have some delegate lead, but he’s not doing as well as the media wants you to believe. And of course DNC is full of spectacular losers like John Kerry, Jimmy Carter, Ted Kennedy, Bill Richardson, and Joe Andrew and many, many others who helped the Republicans to stay in power in their own special and creative ways and devastate our country. They just might do it again, and help Geroge Bush’s 3rd term by nominating Sen. Obama. I think in the last analysis that’s why the media is cheering for Sen. Obama.

Posted by: charleychaplin | May 8, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Obama claiming himself victor in response to a May 20th Oregon victory reveals his Chicago style politics. If the Clinton campaign doesn’t go along with it, there will be further accusations by the media pundits on Clinton’s divisiveness and refusal to quit. In all the clamor that ensues, the media may conveniently not acknowledge that the DNC on May 31st plans to decide whether the FL and MI delegates should have been stripped. Obama is obviously eager to declare victory before May 31 and isn’t too concerned about the party and possible racial splintering that would ensue. Is he going to be given any accountability in the press for declaring a victory before the race is finished?

Posted by: katrina | May 8, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Count Florida and MI and we will know who wins fairly.. Get the Lady in first, he is not good enough to win against the republicans, to many party jumpers will form if he is the choice,, Sorry its the truth

Posted by: Gman | May 8, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

The media and the critics keep moving the yard lines for Clinton FIRST, NH, then TX and OH were must wins, then PA, then IN. Oh yeah, she won them but it STILL isn’t good enough. Who does Obama think is to just declare victory? SOUNDS LIKE AN ARROGANT, chauvanistic, ELITIST to me! Those superdelegates better know what they are in for to just bolt his way. I say Hillary as an Independent or a write in candidate!
Posted by: Darla | May 8, 2008 5:50:35 PM
I agree with you, Dalra… No matter what states Hillary wins (no matter how BIG those states are), it’s just never good enough… NEVER! With Obama, on the other hand, a win in one state (thatnks largely to its black population) becomes major news, and a call for Hillary to drop out!

Posted by: DMK | May 8, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

my comment has been deleted for the fourth time now… but i will keep going
Pro-Obama comments have significantly decreased since tuesday. This proves the theory that most of the Obama supporters on these blogs are in fact paid for by the Obama camp, because now that he’s the winner the office can close and take a vacation.
Let the truth be told!

Posted by: jerome, LA | May 8, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Jerome…that is common knowledge. Let it go bro.

Posted by: hahawrong | May 8, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

This proves the theory that most of the Obama supporters on these blogs are in fact paid for by the Obama camp, because now that he’s the winner the office can close and take a vacation.
Let the truth be told!
Posted by: jerome, LA | May 8, 2008 10:58:56 PM
LOL… I haven’t noticed that. Or is it that the college kids are taking a break or something? After all, we all know that most of those Obamabots are college students..

Posted by: DMK | May 8, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Well that will be interesting if he loses a state by 40% the same day as he declares victory.
I’m sure disrepecting Puerto Rico will go over well in NY and other Hispanic states.
The man is so unelectable.

Posted by: s.b. | May 8, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Jimmy Carter said on Jay Leno last night that the votes of MI and FL should count – in 2012! While Obama bashes Clinton, the loser democratic ex-president that supports Obama makes the rounds of tv talk shows like he’s some kind of royalty. And Carter is just back from his meetings with Obama’s good friends in Hamas. Carter travels all over the world to enforce fair elections, now we know what Carter is really doing – he’s getting paid to throw elections! Obama might as well just declare himself president on May 20th, he already thinks he’s president anyway, and if you disagree with him, then you are a racist!

Posted by: frisco girl | May 8, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

I got my new bumber sticker:
DEMOCRATS FOR McCAIN

Posted by: Nicholas | May 8, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Nonsense. I watched the entire interview. The newsman parsed what Obama said – and cherry-picked one comment to make a case – and threw in a pretty dumb sports line along with it. There was nothing remotely arrogant about the interview, and Obama was completely respectful of Hillary Clinton and her decision to continue the race. “This strikes me as possibly a huge miscalculation.” He didn’t even say that he was assured of a victory – let alone a victory on May 20. And anybody who can read figures knows he doesn’t need the goal posts moved anywhere. There were plenty of solid political stories to cover today – and this is just another bit of manufactured controversy.

Posted by: mara | May 8, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

I tell you one thing that will be fun. Watching MSNBC freak-out when Obama gets trashed. I have not watched MSNBC in 4 months but I think I may have to start just to see Keith cry.

Posted by: former democrat | May 8, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

If Obama loses West Virginia he should drop out.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 8, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Now we see the Hillbots suggesting that
Obama is getting “uppity” since the
last 2 primaries. It’s easier to be
called a feminist than a racist…watch
it you liberal sexists….Big Al and
Rev. JJ are watching.

Posted by: hombre | May 8, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

I finished with the democratic party.
I’m going back to republican party.
I will vote for McCain in november.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 8, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

pt…you are deluding yourself if you think Hillary will bow out after Kentucky. Are you crazy? I called and spoke to a young guy in her Oregon office today and they (Oregonians) want a debate. They have offered chicken little four different dates…he’s either too arrogant to respond or running scared to debate Hillary as usual. How long does he think he can dodge the tough questions in front of televised audience…not some soft ball interview with Tim Russert?
No, Hillary is not pulling out after Kentucky…if you think so, call her Oregon office who are all ready and waiting to fight on with her. She will probably lose liberal Oregon….but she doesn’t run scared.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

fivepin…not everybody is a party loyalist. I am a registered Republican who voted Hillary here in Calif. and have no problem throwing my support to McCain. In fact, I’m going into the
T-shirt business…$19.95…HILLARY SUPPORTERS VOTE McCAIN ’08. Kinda catchy, don’t ya think?

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Mara – thank you for finishing my point. The party loyalty of AA’s is exactly why Obama is doomed in Nov.
- He’s leading today, due to lopsided support from African Americans. He hasn’t galvanized the larger at-risk blocs.
- African Americans have a long history of supporting the democratic candidate. I don’t know if any repub (maybe the Reagan landslide in 84?) carried the black vote.
- The benefit of Obama’s lopsided support isn’t relevant in Nov. He’s tapped out that constituency. Let me say that again. He cannot squeeze any more votes from this demographic. And they were likely to vote dem. anyway.
I’m not trying to write off the black vote or take their loyalty for granted. I’m pointing out that today’s benefit isn’t news in November for the Democrats. Your numbers prove my point. He can’t do better than either Gore, Kerry or Bill. And he’s barely ahead in the race for the nomination with their lopsided (early) support.

Posted by: BoNama | May 8, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Yes Debra, very catchy. However part of my concern is with the Supreme Court nominations. I honestly believe that Hillary’s or Obama’s picks will be similar.

Posted by: fivepin | May 8, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

First off, I think he’s making a mistake by attempting to shut the process down before all the States are in and in doing so he certainly isn’t going to win over those Clinton supporters very easily. I’m not surprised though that he would be looking at attempting to shut this process down by the end of May because I very much doubt that he wants too much coverage on the primaries in Puerto Rico. The mainstream media down there has covered the Sinclair allegations and I would think there would be a potential for that to hit our mainstream media. I’ve always figured Obama wouldn’t let this process go to Puerto Rico because of that.

Posted by: alpaig | May 8, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

jerome, hahawrong, DMK….I must admit the vicious Obama cult are not blogging as much…paid or otherwise. They must think it’s in the tank for BO. I heard there is going to be a bombshell for BO in October…someone in Clinton camp was mentioned on Fox as knowing something. Wright’s autobiography and book tour perhaps? October will be too late but I do feel Obama is sort of radioactive and ready to implode anytime.

Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

BoNama -
Lopsided early support from African Americans is why he’s ahead?
That’s funny. My state is whiter than a boxes set of episodes of the Lawrence Welk show. We probably have more albinos than African Americans or any other non-white race here.
And guess what… Obama won our votes in a landslide…
How can you get excited about a candidate who’s willing to say “choose me as your nominee, because white folks won’t vote for the black dude”?
Even if it’s statistically true, this racial divide is a disgusting phenomenon, and whatever the cause, it represents the antithesis of what the Democratic Party stands for.
How can you March into Battle with her?
“I can’t win delegates, popular votes, states, contests, or any other measure, but if you choose the black guy, white people won’t go for him, so superdelegates should overturn the results and give it to me”
That’s seriously the leader you want to follow???

Posted by: fontapa | May 8, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

You know I really don’t think any of the Obama supporters get it being nice is not going to heal this thier are millions of women that are broken hearted by the way Hillary has been treated we know she can take the heat but it still cuts deep and the healing will be a long time coming all the nasty jokes all the put downs have really cut deep into some of our souls that is why this election is not going to turn out well.

Posted by: Bishop | May 9, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

BoNama -
Another foolish point full of holes…
Why would anyone only look at the last 10 votes in a nominating process to compare nominees?
Obama’s won over 3/4ths of the contests so far. Over 30 contests. At one point, he won 12 in a row.
He’s maintained a delegate lead for months.
Is this another Clinton tactic of picking meaningless statistics out of thin air?
“Well, if you only count votes taken on days when the moon is in the house of Aquarius, and you only count congenital idiots named Goober in half the states, and only Pediatricians in the other states, and you divide that by my social security number, and you thawed out Walt Disney’s head and used it to play skee-ball, and took the best score 2 out of 3, and than pretended that number was my delegate count, then I’d be winning…”

Posted by: fontapa | May 9, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

We’re still in it to win it. Hillary will prevail. Crush Obama in WV, Kentucky, and we’re in for an Oregon surprise! (There is only a tiny AA population in Oregon, and Oregon’s majority leans to right of center. Voting is already underway, started at the height of the Jeremiah Wright scandal. We shall see, we shall see.
=======================================
Obama and Bittergate, we’ll not forget!

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 9, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

“Ok, that’s it. ABC has silenced me for the last time. Consider me no longer a viewer once “Dancing with the Stars” is over.”
Guys, can we have a partisan break for a moment? Cease-fire? Okay.
Can anyone tell me this is not the funniest single quote you’ve ever seen on this site? Not attacking him for being a particular supporter, but just thought the quote itself was hysterical.
Maybe its just me…

Posted by: fontapa | May 9, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Do not be distressed about your comments being deleted or not deleted.
Because it does not change anything.
All you have to do is vote MCCAIn in November, if Hillary is not the nominee and work between now and then to get as many as you know how to vote for MCCAIN.
A WIN for MCCAIN in November is all that counts …

Posted by: DoNotDistress | May 9, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

fontapaw…Obama had his lucky 11 win streak when he was still unknown and Americans were “hope”ful. I do think alot of the nation wanted a new face, especially a new face of color. Unfortunately, more and more of us started educating ourselves and his negatives grew and grew. Too late, he already won those 11 states. He’s lost his new car smell and is a stinky lemon.
Wright, Rezko, Ayers, his wife, Hamas, the list goes on and on and Republicans are getting ready for some mud slinging. We all know the Clintons…no real surprises there.
They’ve done more for American people than Obmam in his 143 days working in the Senate. His resume is horribly lacking, so is his judgement.

Posted by: Debra | May 9, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

“Typical White Person” here…..
I’m votin’ for McCain if Clinton isn’t the nominee.

Posted by: Ryan | May 9, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Hey moderator, can you sense how disappointed we, Hillary ardent supporters, are if she does not get the Democratic nominee?
And for the media and the Obama-stricken political pundits to suggest that we will all rally behind Obama once Clinton drops out of the race is nauseating ..
It will never happen … Do you see that?
We are the Hillary supporters who really believe she would make a great President … head and shoulders over Obama anytime, anyplace and anywhere.
We will never rally behind Obama, rain or shine.

Posted by: NeverRallyBehindO | May 9, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Debra -
I didn’t say Hillary didn’t win big states. I saw a post that said Obama’s delegate lead was due to overwhelming African American support in the early states.
There are a couple of problems with this.
There were several early states that he got a net delegate lead from that had very small African American populations, like mine.
Second, in the beginning of this campaign, his support amongst African Americans wasn’t all that profound. It gained strength over time.
My other point is simple.
Hillary can’t win delegates, popular votes, number of states, or any other measure of victory.
She now says she’s running solely on the idea that Superdelegates might overwhelmingly flock to her side. (she’d need upwards of 7/10 of all remaining supers).
Her rationale for why they should overturn the democratic results of the entire contest?
She says white people won’t vote for the black candidate.
That’s it. That’s her argument.
It’s irrelevant how much statistical evidence there is to this rationale, the fact remains it is a DISGUSTING phenomenon on both sides of the issue.
Complete racial polarization is the opposite of everything the Democratic Party stands for. To tout it as your core campaign strength is appalling.
I don’t care if it’s effective in getting her the nomination, she should be just as repulsed by taking advantage of that polarization as she would an offer to have George Bush as her VP.
Some things transcend scoring political points and victories.
In short, if she has to take advantage of this repulsive racism taking place on both sides to get the nomination, she should do the decent thing and let the nomination go.

Posted by: fontapa | May 9, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Bishop, sounds like you are voting for Hillary because she is a woman. I am a 70 year old white woman who thinks Hillary will do anything to win the nomination. She has lied and can’t be trusted. You can’t fool an old woman like me. She does not have your best interest at heart. This is all about the Clinton legacy and their entitlement to the white house. Hillary will say anything to get your vote. How about the gas tax. I had to laugh about that, just pandering. And even when all the economists rejected it she still moved on with it. She reminds me of George W Bush. They are the cowboys that won’t listen to anyone because they think they are right. We don’t need this. I am staying home and not voting because McCain will not take this country forward either. I do care about the Supreme Court though.

Posted by: emma | May 9, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

WestCoastMessenger…are you sure about Oregon. I thought it was more liberal and leaning very left. Sounds like Obamaland. I will say the young guy I talked to in Hillary’s Oregon office today sounded pumped up and ready to work hard for a win. THEY HAVE TO GET HIM TO DEBATE AGAIN. He looks like such a weenie when he dodges. If he’s so ready to claim his victory…show some confidence and do televised debate. Oregon is going to press him on this and he can’t claim no time excuse. There aren’t that many states left to campaign in…maybe he wants another vacation break like his Easter in St. Thomas. Hillary was at church and working hard on campaign. This is one tough fighter and hard worker. HILLARY OR McCAIN ’08. THERE WILL BE A SURGE IN REPUBLICAN SUPPORT IF OBAMA GETS THIS NOM.

Posted by: Debra | May 9, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Debra -
You’re deluding yourself if you think Obama would galvanize Republican support more than Clinton. There is no-one in America the Republican Party hates more that Bill and Hillary Clinton.
I’m guessing you are either extremely young, or you were living in a cave throughout the late nineties.
Don’t you see, this is why Rush wanted folks to vote for Clinton. This is why the Republians, John McCain, and all the conservative independent groups have been attacking Obama non-stop and saying nothing about Clinton.
A contest with Hillary Clinton would be the wildest wet fantasy the Republicans could have ever dreamed of.
Luckily enough for the Democratic Party, a Hillary Clinton nomination is just that, a fantasy.
The numbers don’t lie, even when coming out of Hillary’s mouth.

Posted by: fontapa | May 9, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

If Hillary is not the nominee , it will be a disaster for the Dems. who can brace themselves and kiss up to the ultra-Liberals for another 8 Republcan years . McCain is a much more deserving candidate who will not bend to the likes of Hugo Chavez , Mamouth Amedinejad ( or whateva that nut is called) , like Obama . As for Hillary , you have run a great campaign , what a lady , I thought Thatcher of London was the Iron Lady , well , I was wrong , we have a more deserving one at that title now . Too bad she got stabbed in the back by her so-called friends and by the black community whom she helped a lot when her husband is the pres. and speaking of Bill , well , he got his problems , but at least , he did his job when Hired , so , that is fine with me , I don’t mind having him a second time around in this needy period . I know a lot of Americans won’t mind too. I say Hillary should go and run as an independent the way Joe Libberman did . Show the unappreciative Dems and the rest of the nation what you can do ….if Hillary is not the nominee, she should run as an indepedent and I bet she will still win . Screw the Dems. party ……Run as an independent….Hillary 08 ….

Posted by: alohaone | May 9, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

people who think Clintons are nothing but powerhungry maniacs…. where have you been the last 16 years? The Clintons have done more for the average person in this country than anybody else since LBJ. Seriously… you republicans just don’t grow up.
Let’s not forget that the bush’s and regean’s were basically from the same allegiance. And let’s not forget that some of Nixon’s people became George W’s people (cheny and rumsfeld)… it does not get more power-mongering than that.

Posted by: kissthesky | May 9, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Fontapa,
the racism issue is a genuine relevant issue. Even Obama has admitted that.
The fact is, America is on the brink of disaster right now after 8 years of George W with the economy and the war. If the republicans get the presidency for the next 4 years, who knows if there will be much of an America left. It doesn’t matter whether it is racism or inexperience or (insert issue here) is the reason that Obama might lose… a loss is a loss.

Posted by: kissthesky | May 9, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

How arrogant and presumptuous of Obama to coronate himself king already. In primaries held since Obama’s judgement has been called into question by the Rev. Wright controversy, Hillary has won the vote in four out of the five big state primaries: Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, and Indiana, yet she’s supposed to quit?

Posted by: andre | May 9, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

I still think Hillary can win. She has very good reasons to argue that she’s a better candidate than Obama, from what has been played out in the primaries so far. We shouldn’t look at the so called delegates math because it’s a flawed system which needs to be changed in the future.
First of all, caucuses should be canceled. I’m so surprised that this so undemocratic thing actually exists in the democratic party!!! This is the thing that has virtually killed Hillary. However, it does not represent voters much. All caucuses delegates should be canceled. Let all people vote! Then you will see that Hillary’s a stronger candidate! Caucuses don’t exist in the general election, so Obama might lose big!
Secondly, it should be winner-take-all, just like the general election. Hillary has virtually won nearly all the big states and swing states, yet Obama hasn’t proven his electability in this aspect.
Hillary should definitely fight on until the end, because Obama will not want to lose the election and he’s sent out signals that he might ask Hillary to be his running mate. In this case, Hillary should negotiate with Obama about the ticket. The deal she proposes should be clinton/Obama, not vice versa. Obama either accept the deal to be her VP, or Hillary run as an independent or even wait for 2012. So in the end, Obama might have to accept it because he will lose without working together with Hillary!!! Even if Obama doesn’t accept it, the democratic party will beg him to accept to be VP because they can’t afford to lose the party!!!
Hillary, you go, fight until August in the convention. You have so many adamant supporters lining up behind you. I’ll not vote for Obama, never, ever!

Posted by: Cici | May 9, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

It’s amusing to note that since college is out the Obamabots, and their hateful divisive Internet spam has mysteriously disappeared up.
Hillary’s supporters have valued her for her experience, dedication, and unrelentless fight for the common man. Many of us remember the 1990s when she worked tirelessly to implement universal health care for EVERYONE. We will be there for her now.

Posted by: Joanna | May 9, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I can’t wait to see the defector DEMs numbers be the largest EVER in Nov., if Obama is the nominee. REALLY, it will be the other historic thing about this election. Hillary supporters are not just saying it either…they will strongly and maybe more silently do it…vote McCain. I know there is a website Recreate68 that is threatening riots if Obama doesn’t get it, and everyone is all quiet now, because they believe this think is buttoned up. There could be an upset anyday. Wright could give another interview. There is BIG money to be made, for whoever has film of Obama in Wright’s church during inflammatory sermons, or any info. I think Wright is in lock down mode and there are helicopters over his house all the time. I’m sure there is part of the Obama posse at all the doors to his house 24/7. It’s not just Wright….there is SOMETHING out there and camp Hillary knows it. That being said, we all know enough, without another bombshell. IF NOT HILLARY, THAN McCAIN ’08! Looking forward to next debate in Oregon.

Posted by: Debra | May 9, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

The beloved Messiah Obama who can walk on water who will unite the Democratic Party and cause change in our government. Oh please tell us how you will do this Mr. Obama. Please tell us we really want to know. While we are waiting for our Messiah Mr. Obama to tell us how he is going to do all the things he has promised. Let’s take a look at some interesting facts articles that point to the real character and essence of our beloved Messiah Mr. Obama.
1. Obama donor received a state grant (Obama caught laundering money)
April 27 article La Times
2. The Truth VS. Barack Obama (full version) savagepolitics.com
3. Big Donors Among Obama’s Grass Roots
‘Bundlers’ Have a Voice in Campaign
By Matthew Mosk and Alec MacGillis
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, April 11, 2008
4.Obama and Farc (Obama cuts deal with FARC)bornagainredneck.blogspot.com
5. The Kenyan jihad
Sunday,6th January 2008 spectator.co.uk
6. Facts about Rezco Trial.
rezkowatch.blogspot.com
7. OBAMA LAUNDRY LIST OF LIES as of April 16, 2008 (76 lies and counting)
audacityofhypocrisy.com
8. Interesting news articles on Obama
slickbarry.com
There are so many many more sources that will give ineresting news articles on Obama. All it takes is time and patience to look them up.
After you read all this information is Obama really the Messiah of the USA? He most certainly is not. On just one point who can vote for someone who Laundered $112,000 thru his Law that he received from Mr. Blackwell. Who can vote for some one who has lied to us so many times and played dirty politics, Who pulled the race card so many times and accused Hillary of doing all of this and she didn’t? Obama did all these dirty Politics as usual tricks. Who brushed Hillary off his shoulders like dandruff or the dirt he walks on. 9No respect for Hillary and No respect for Women)Obama did. Who flipped off Hillary? Obama did. Who has Lied more than any candidate running for President of the USA? If you guessed Obama your right!
Lets find out how Obama supporters have been bamboozled, lied too, manipulated, conned into such an emotional frenzies that all their common sense, logic and reason have been thrown under the bus like the majority of Americans who earn less than $250,000.
The formula:
1. Agitate to engage emotions by telling stories of wounded veteran, the poor and uninsured.
2. Give message or spew lies
3. Heal with feel good emotions by giving feel good quotes, tell joke, tell story with happy ending.
Everything in step 2 when the emotions are engaged becomes absolute truth with out question. Why because we are hurt emotionally (Step 1) by the peoples true stories at this point all common sense, reasoning and logic have totally been thrown under the bus. Step 2. Everything said becomes truth eve if a bunch lies has just been spewed. Step 3 Ensures that you feel good emotionally about the message or lies just spewed to you and again all common sense, reasoning, and logic are thrown under the bus again. This is the reason why Obama can only give prepared teleprompter speeches and Obama fails to answer questions from the audience or in Debates. He only knows how to speak using this formula in prepared speeches. Obama supporters, DNC and Super-delegates vote for Hillary and tell Obama the jig is up and tell Obama to end his candidacy for President of the USA.

Posted by: Bob4USA | May 9, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

I think the bombshell that is going to happen in October that could hurt Obama’s chances of winning the general election is that Bush will attack Iran.
In that case experience vs. inexperience may become a much larger factor in the race. We have to remember there our polls that show that the American public when it comes to foreign policy trust the Democrats more than the Republicans. When asked though about specific candidates -Clinton, Obama and McCain- they go overwhelmingly McCain.

Posted by: alpaig | May 9, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Obama should let the game play out till June 3 so that Hillary can be seen to be utterly beatten. She wouldn’t have any real or imaginary grounds for claiming that the party pushed her out of the race when she had even a remote chance of success.

Posted by: Drew Rocker | May 9, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

catleya…that one word is “fullos—”!
I can’t believe Obama is really serious about declaring himself a victory today. He was walking around Capitol Hill like he’s the man. He really is so arrogant. Why can’t the Rev. come out and play again? Tell us the truth Rev…don’t let us wait for your book in October.

Posted by: Debra | May 9, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

catleya…Hillary is in Oregon tonight and they are all excited. I would love for her to do well, thou they are predicting it’s Obama’s to win.
I have to tell you, I am a registered Republican who was able to get a Democratic ticket on Feb. 5th, here in Calif. and voted for Hillary. I will support her all the way, for her work ethic, solutions, intelligence, and expert spouse in these troubled global times. (Michelle is no asset for BO). That said…if she was to be the VP, I would still have to vote McCain as he is Presidential material and Obama is not. Hillary would have to lead him by the hand (he copies whatever she says anyways if you saw any of the debates). I really hope Oregonians pressure him to debate Hillary….they have given him 4 different dates, yet he always runs scared. There aren’t that many more states to campaign in so he HAS time. It would be a ratings getter, for sure. He has only debated her FOUR TIMES one on one….but they spin it like its 21 debates. Stay supportive…Hillary or McCain ’08!

Posted by: Debra | May 9, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

Under Winner-Take-All system, Hillary would have been the nominee.
Throw the caucus results out and Obama’s real strength shows.
Barack McGovern Obama is simply not electable.

Posted by: Roger Miller | May 9, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

Axelrod and Obama must be hoping for a new cluster of losers to come out of the woodwork, along with the raised level of Hillary bashing by the media to get him through this.
So far, just about every Democratic loser has come out in support of Obama. Perhaps they think that by using Obama as a surrogate to defeat the Clintons somehow it will magically turn them into winners.
Kerry, Kennedy, Carter, Dean, Gore’s campaign folks like Brazile, Kerry’s like Shrum, Reid the ineffective Sen. leader that has not won a single legislative victory, Pelosi to whom the same applies, and on and on. All losers.
It doesn’t work that way. Losers are losers, winners are winners. Even if the losers help defeat the only winners we have had period in the last 42 years, and the only 2 term winners we have had in the past 64 years; nothing changes for them.
They are still losers, and history has recorded them as such.
Obama will soon join their infamous clique, either in the primary or the GE.

Posted by: MC | May 9, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

Unless Obama sticks Hillary on the ticket, he aint winning the presidency.
I myself have tried to get Clinton supporters to come to Obama, but they are just so differnt socially that they cant stand the guy.
There really is a huge social split in the party. Its not just about Obama being a democrat.
Electing a president hasnt been about the issues since 92. Then it was Clinton nailing Bush with the enconomy.
Its always about character. Its so funny , but there are so many folks who would never vote for Obama cause he is pro choice, and those who wont vote for Mc Cain because he is pro life.
It really comes down to simple values like that.
Obama carries himself like an upscale liberal. Wearing overalls and playing the banjo is not going to get him clinton democrats.
He must convince them he is better than a war hero. He can pin the economy on him , but again it was Bush’s economy , not Mc Cains.
This is why there is no way for Obama to get the clinton democrats back unless he stick her back on the ticket.
He can then dispatch Bubba out to the sticks to stump rural folks. He is better at getting their vote than anyone except ronald reagan.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 9, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

I have watched for eight years as the neo-cons tore our country apart.I was so looking forward to this election, because it was our chance to make things better.
I am an Independent but support Hillary, because she is without a doubt the smartest, strongest candidate. I have been turned off by the MSM treatment of her, by Obama and his team’s arrogant dismissal of her candidacy, and by the disrespect the DNC has shown her and in retrospect the many Americans who support her.
This election has been an eye-opener. I have watched Ted Kennedy shamelessly pass his brother’s legacy to an unproven candidate; while Jesse Jackson
as shamelessly passed DR Martin Luther King’s mantle to a man who has done nothing for his people or this country. The topping on the cake was when we were told to believe the talking-point that the out-spoken, opinionated Michelle Obama was like the very reticent, soft- spoken Jacqueline Kennedy.
Obviously, the Democrats are too stupid
to win, because they think the American people can’t see the writing on the wall. If they cannot support Hillary, I for one will without hesitation vote for McCain, an American hero and patriot.

Posted by: BJinChicago | May 9, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am

Senior Dems Constructed the Hillary-Stopper, a soft spoken black man who would take all of traditional support in the black community. Obama is a fraud, a smoothtalker with no policy but to keep a smart and focused woman, better prepared than anyone in the USA from getting to be President. These people gave us John Kerry when we could have gotten Howard Dean. Now it is Obama. Dems will always loose elections if they don’t stop electing candidates who look good, instead of candidates with a substance and an agenda for America that win. Liberal polite snobs do not win! Obama has the Anatomy of Looser written all over him.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | May 9, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

I predict Hillary will win the nomination.

Posted by: Uma | May 9, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am

What I really believe is this.
Hillary Clinton is the best candidate. She is the strongest candidate.
Obama is the better public speaker, and had the far better team. He deserves the nomination.
Many folks are putting out this crud that democrats must win and republicans lose. Its the election cycle.
However, Al Gore won the 2000 election in reality, in spite of the Lewinski scandal.
Bush beat dukakis in 88 as well.
The problem is that both John Mc Cain and Barack Obama represent the weakest election candidates I have seen since Ford vs Carter.
Obama is deeply flawed on a personal level . The fact that he is african american means he needs to make an extra connection with whites to show them we are all the same.
But Obama isnt a populist, nor would he wear it well. He is a super star. A latte liberal. High minded, and high ideals.
But Obama has no experience, nor anything but a past that his handlers are determined to keep shut.
His pastor is a drastic problem that sheds him as different than other americans, no matter how he tries to spin.
His wife is angry, and reminds people of a young angry Hillary Clinton far more than Michelle Obama would ever want to admit to even herself .
And then there is Mc Cain. America already knows him. War hero, POW , old guy.
A long stand in the US senate and a mixed bag of signals. Half republican, half democratic.
But at least folks can Identify with him.
Obama will try to stay on course and call Mc Cain ‘ Mc Bush, and try to pin every failing of the bush administration on Mc Cain.
But it always come back to character, and whether voters can identify with the candiates.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 9, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am

Okay
Obama is MORE electable than Clinton…and less tied to old school politics that got us here. (her ceiling was low to begin with and her high floor has now dropped because of this primary we have seen this now not only in polls but elections). Her base is convicted and will fight for her until the death…but it was at 51% of Americans at it’s height…that has now shrunk so far that she CAN NOT WIN. Obama has not.
It will come down to character on one level but not all …and look at Obama’s “character” numbers they are still (after all of this recent mud) still almost as strong if not stronger than McCain’s.
Then there are the issues… a no brainer.
and for those who say 50% of Clinton supporters won’t vote for Obama…that is hog wash…and anyone who keeps typing might as well say Obama is Godzilla…or the stay puff Marshmallow Man…because those are about as accurate.
Maybe 10-15% of Clinton supporters are going to be angry enough at Hillary losing to vote for a Pro-life…economic stale mate of a candidate as McCain…who wants to continue the foreign policy that is making us and the world less safe ( as much as theywant to portray the opposite…it’s not hard to see we have fanned the flames of alquaeda)…
so all these arguments you all want to write are either just plain dumb or just plain out of not wanting to lose…I am pretty sure they are the latter.

Posted by: dl | May 9, 2008, 6:37 am 6:37 am

—It is what I hate about Obama—he is so sure of himself–too sure—thinks everyone is below him—he is really nuts —coconuts—-

Posted by: Jesse James | May 9, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

All he need behind him is the banner
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED also.
This will have the same meaning as president bushes declaration.
It will not mean a thing. because he still will not have the number of 2209 delagates.

Posted by: toby | May 9, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

This cocky elitist will never get my vote!

Posted by: HoosierSue | May 9, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Just in case Obama needs a reminder-THIS is not a baseball game-its a presidential primary-in third world countries-like he grew up in-you can declare yourself the winner-here-you must get the required number of delegates to be the parties nominee-if he doesn’t have them after our vote in oregon-he is only the nominee in his head-and his left wing supporters

Posted by: gowestyoungman111 | May 9, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

tomdavie, Hillary as VP will not bring the party together. I will grudgingly vote for a Clinton/Obama ticket, but never Obama/Clinton.
Hillary has proven that she is the smartest, most-qualified candidate. Women of a certain age have seen situations like these time and again in the work place. Where an inferior man gets propped up by a superior woman. Not this time.

Posted by: HoosierSue | May 9, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

The media is painting a picture much different than the true reality of what is going on.
According to Lou Dobbs Tonight the news has a favorable bias towards Obama and against Senator Clinton. Here are the statistics from his web site.
Lou Dobbs Tonight – Quick Vote
Lou Dobbs had a quick vote on his show tonight and the results were as follows:
Do you believe there is a media bias against Hillary Clinton and in favor of Barack Obama?
Yes 72% 13161
No 28% 5013
Total Votes: 18174
My community wants a Democrat to win the White House. There are just too many issues about Senator Obama that would be raised by the Republicans that he would never be able to defend or withstand.
If Obama is the nominee, not Senator Clinton, Democrats will not win the White House.
Please visit Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun Times, sites on the internet; especially “you tube” to see what the youth is seeing and hearing.
Reverend Wright, Obama’s Church, Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, Obama’s ties with Louis Farrakhan, radical William Ayers and Tony Rezko the Syrian criminal.
Read about the Million Man March, Black Power and Malcolm X.
This is serious. Save our youth from all of Obama’s deception.
This is a new world of media outlets for candidates. People are watching and listening to all of it.
Obama is scary.

Posted by: Al from NJ | May 9, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I used to want a combo-ticket-no more-why should Hillary and her supporters save his Butt. She has more to offer this country than he does-why should she take a posistion in an administration that will fumble its way thru some very tough problems-He won’t get elected without her-and will ruin the democratic party for years if elected-so I say-if Hillary doesn’t win the nomination-stay as Senator Clinton and disassociate yourself from his coming debacle.

Posted by: gowestyoungman111 | May 9, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

yeah there’s a media bias against Hillary and for Obama. after Hillary won indiana, the stories the media wanted to portray about it was the conspiracy that rush limbaugh voters were the ones who made her win. they forgot to mention in those articles the important development that the teamster union supported obama right before the election — the very same issue they reported before the election but quickly forgot after the election because it didn’t help their story about the limbaugh campaign.
Also, remember when Hillary went on O’Reilly? CNN had a lovefest for Michelle Obama that same night, giving her interviews and putting it on repeat like 3 or 4 times. She’s not even running for president! It was one of the most unsubstantative things I’ve seen CNN do at an important moment in the primary election.

Posted by: kissthesky | May 9, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

and when RFK Jr threw his support behind Clinton, it got buried in the news, unlike Carolyn’s announcement. What has Carolyn really done for the American people? Not much compared to RFK Jr.

Posted by: kissthesky | May 9, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

the media can be held accountable to their actions now… because this is the internet age and we can save every article they publish on and off the web. we can record their behavior and talk about it for generations to come.
if Obama loses the general election, the media will have blood on their hands. For helping shove his candidacy through the nomination process and not helping the American people vet what kind of candidate he really is.

Posted by: kissthesky | May 9, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

That would be a fatal mistake… Obama should declare no victory until he has enough delegates too say so, or go to the convention and get nominated.
What is the rush…
Very careful is the key word…

Posted by: Imogene Covin | May 9, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

I am from Oregon, and we are not giving up on Hillary-she hasn’t given up on the american people and we are not giving up on her-keep fighting in Oregon to give Hillary a win

Posted by: gowestyoungman111 | May 9, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

If the Clintons and the SDs go against BHO after the pledge delegates have been assigned, what evidence do they have that party won’t rip itself apart?
in the reverse
If BHO and the SDs go with the pledge delegates, what evidence do they have that the party won’t rip itself apart?

Posted by: Genna | May 9, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

gowestyoungman…you need to keep Hillary’s request for a debate going. She out performs him at every opportunity and even HIS supporters know he is weak at debates. Clinton camp and Oregonians are asking for a debate and have given several dates, but I’m certain he’s blowing it off now, presuming he has this nom. If he’s so sure, why not debate her for the last time? Your local papers/press should be all over this. HE RUNS SCARED and just wants to ride this out.
The entertaining Rev. Wright will rear his ugly head again tho…it just better be before November.

Posted by: Debra | May 9, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

For all the great Hillary supporters on these ABC blogs (and we are many)…the funny thing is I’ve been watching all week and Obama didn’t even have to declare himself the winner…the media has by acting as if we’er on to the General. News coverage is way down on future primaries, like they don’t matter. They assume Hillary will win Tues. so no one is talking about that. Then everyone is waiting for the big Oregon win for Obama. There was an Oregonian blogger somewhere that said they are all excited and ready, but I feel the media is pushing this along. Also, let’s see Obama debate one more time. I love watching him stutter.

Posted by: Debra | May 9, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

How can Obama claim victory without Florida and Michigan? Really, they are in such a rush to get through this…can’t wait until it backfires. There will not be the healing the Oabma camps thinks…even if Hillary gets on her knees and pleads her supporters to vote BO. I have never disliked a Presidenial candidate more and NOT BECAUSE OF HIS SKIN COLOR. If he were white going to a black hating, jew hating, country hating church with very close ties to pastor…I would not vote for the white guy.
I cannot believe that after Rev. Wright and all Hillary’s important win states, he wins NC and they think they are back on track with middle America? NC is not representative of the electorate. Really amazing how Huckabee stayed in the race (far behind where Hillary is) and no one was so outspoken for him to get out. Wow they have treated her like s— this whole campaign. Go to savagepolitics.com and see the truth about Obama. THAT will be why millions of Americans will never vote for him.

Posted by: Debra | May 9, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

For all you so-called democrats who say you’ll vote for McCain:
Go ahead! Vote for McCain!
You’re probably the same people who voted for George W. twice, and got us into this mess we’re in.
So, if you want to eliminate Roe v. Wade, and continue the deaths of our fellow Americans abroad, so be it.

Posted by: s_ben | May 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

If Senator Obama declares himself a winner before he has the required number of voters’ delegates, it shows his arrogance and complete disrespect for the election system. With his millions in campaign funds, he will be able to buy the superdelegates with the promise of funds or other favors. So far, the superdelegates don’t seem to be very concerned about electing the most qualified candidate to move America forward. HERE COMES THE CHICAGO VERSION OF CLEAN POLITICS. SHAME. SHAME. Hope Clinton fights on for the average American family.

Posted by: Mai | May 9, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

The reason Obama wants to declare himself the winner early is so the pledged delagates won’t have the opportunity to switch to Hillary at the National Convention. Typical Chicago style corrupt politics as usual.

Posted by: Bob4USA | May 10, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Obama may want to declare himself the winner but that is just more of his silly arrogance. There are way too many of us who have been Democrats voting a straight Democratic ticket for over forty years who will NEVER vote for him because he chose to inject racism into this campaign. I would not vote for a racist with a white skin and I will not vote for a racist with a black skin. It breaks my heart that he turned out to be the charletan that he is but when I saw through him I knew that I must do every legal thing that I can to see that he is not elected.

Posted by: Linda Mac | May 10, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I HAVE STARTED TO DISLIKE OBAMA :), and it is quite difficult for me to dislike people in general.
Obama and his team are demonstrating a high level of meanness and lack of respect for others. When he trailed the superdelegates, their team were totally against the concept, now that they are leading, they love it. Before the vote of people meant something but their team is chicken and can not see that Hillary may indeed lead in the popular vote.
More importantly, Obama is totally overrated. :)
Do we really want another idiot in the white house? :) …. Or another loser such as Kerry so that McCain goes to white house?
Between Obama and McCain, my democrat vote will be casted for McCain!

Posted by: Meg | May 12, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

I hate how people keep saying Obama is African-American and needs to make a connection to the white voters. I hate how people keep saying Obama is a racist in a black skin…
Are you people stupid? Obama is HALF AFRICAN AMERICAN and HALF WHITE. If anything, he’s the least likely to be racist and the most likely to understand both sides of the race issue.
I wonder how anybody can seriously believe anything you people say when you don’t even know the simple facts…

Posted by: md | May 13, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

“You’re probably the same people who voted for George W. twice, and got us into this mess we’re in.”
No, actually we voted for the Dem candidate, not Nader, not Kucinich. For Gore and Kerry, and we got burned with who the party picked for us. Now we have a candidate that will fight for the agenda we’ve been waiting for, and she’s been told to “go away, your slip is showing, again.” I won’t vote for McCain, but I won’t vote for Obama either, I can’t have that on my conscience.

Posted by: MonaL | May 19, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.