Obama Moves on to General Election Before Primaries Conclude
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was campaigning in New Mexico today, and this week he will also hit Nevada and Colorado.
These are states that have already held their primaries — Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., won New Mexico, she won Nevada, though Obama won more delegates, and Obama won Colorado.
Is the Democratic primary season over? No, it’s not. But Obama is signaling that he has moved on to the general election.
Puerto Rico and its 55 pledged delegates are up for grabs Sunday, and Montana and South Dakota will hold their contests — with a combined 31 pledged delegates available — on Tuesday, June 3. Obama will spend time in all three states, but he will also be spending time in these general election states, instead of spending time in the primary states.
So, is it presumptuous for Obama to be campaigning in states other than the three holding contests this week?
Depends who you ask.
Certainly the math is tough, if not impossible, for Clinton.
But then again, what signal does it send that Obama is taking time he could be spending in PR, MT, and SD, focused on the general election? Certainly that signal is something his campaign wants to be sending. They want everyone, especially the media and the 200-plus uncommitted superdelegates, to say this is all over.
But we don’t know what the Democratic National Committee’s rules and bylaws committee will decide to do on Saturday, when it rules on the Michigan and Florida contests.
The ruling will likely mean the number of delegates needed to win the nomination will change.
And what happens if 900,000 Puerto Ricans turn out on Sunday and vote 70-30 for Clinton? Won’t that seriously buttress her popular vote argument so that she doesn’t have to rely on that fuzzy math where she gives herself 320,000 votes from Michigan and gives Obama zero?
And what happens if Obama doesn’t win Montana or South Dakota, states he’s expected to put in his column? Will he regret his time in Las Cruces?
The math is the math, yes, but Obama acting as if this is all a done deal certainly might rub some Democrats the wrong way. What say you? Is he being arrogant or pragmatic? Presumptuous or wise?
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I certainly enjoy your posts. I think he’s being smart by campaigning in the general election states. You were absolutely correct when you said that it sends a message to those superdelegates (who matter at this point) that the race is over. HOWEVER, as you also pointed out, everyone is speculating on what the committee will do Saturday, but no one truly knows what will happen. That meeting can completely change the game in terms of the primaries. We will see….
Posted by: rdp | May 26, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
May I point to you that even if the commitee sat Fl and MI on Sunday as they voted – which you are savvy enough to know it won’t happen – he would still need to win only 30% of the remaining pledged delegate + superdelegate to win ?
She won’t win PR by those margins and he won’t lose MT or SD. But even if he did, he only needs 30% of all the delegates still out there. There is no scenario in which he loses. Period. You may want to be seen as “even-handed” and all but that’s like saying there was a chance for Huckabee to be the nominee after mcCain won FL. Yeah it wasn’t mathematically impossible yet but did anyone argue with a straight face it wasn’t “impossible” and therefore legitimate topic to report ?
Posted by: Benjamin | May 26, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Sure. The only people he is “rubbing the wrong way” are the folks who are inclined to vote for Hillary. She lost, end of story. We need Obama to pivot to the general. We can’t afford to waste time on primaries when a third term of Bush policies looms on the horizon. Obama/Sebelius 08!!
Posted by: Susan | May 26, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
And by the way, I know you are personally fond of the meme that Obama is arrogant but in this particular case, the candidate with a ego problem isn’t him. Enough said.
Posted by: Benjamin | May 26, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Is it possible () that Obama may have enough private commitments from superdelegates that he knows he will be on top in the end ?
I could give you fifteen names in the “undeclared” that I know will vote for Obama and only stay neutral “because”.
How many others – not as famous – have told them they are for here but won’t say it publicly yet ?
Has it ever occured to you that you – we – don’t know everything. I doubt they’d take that gamble if they weren’t sure of what they are doing
Posted by: Michelle Abbott | May 26, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Presumptuous? That’s the hack reporter who thinks he knows how to run a campaign better than the winning candidate. Oh yeah, arrogant too.
Posted by: joe dobson | May 26, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
I think hes a very smart man and he is gathering his forces and preparing for the inevitable fight against the forces of repugnant-can evil. He is focused on truth not fantasy. Peace and Obama 08!
Posted by: mitch | May 26, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
My guess is that Pelosi, Dean and the Dem Party leaders have already told Obama not to worry — they will make sure he gets the nomination. They have the delegates he needs and will take care of things. I’m sure he’s already been told that FLA, MI and all other issues will be resolved in his favor so he should just go ahead and start campaigning for the general. However, I really tbink the Dem Party leaders and the Obama camp are underestimating the extent of the support for Hillary among the Dem base.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 26, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Overly confident. The popular vote that he’s rubbed the wrong way will not vote for him in the GE. Do the math.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 26, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Jake, you are playing into my dream scenario. Maybe Obama will get blind-sited.
Posted by: Tina from Florida | May 26, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
I’m sick of hearing about mathematical impossibilities…if Obama gets 30% of the vote next week in all the primaries and about 10 more of the 200+ undecided superdelegates, the race is plain and simply, OVER. This isn’t a matter of which side you support, it’s simple math. There’s not a chance in hell the FL and MI delegations get seated 100% –I’d bet millions of dollars on that — and I think even Terry MacCaullife would agree with me.
Posted by: Jane | May 26, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
It could be that focusing on the general election, he is sending a message to the supers that he is already getting the show on the road and they’d better not stop it. But that would be a big gamble on his part if he doesn’t have some signal from the supers that his investment will not be in vain. I think that Obama’s track record so far shows that he calculates his strategies very carefully and rarely takes gratuitous gambles. So I would say, he’s already got a signal from the supers that he is safe to move on with the campaign and whoever is not convinced yet will be when they see him working hard to get the democrats ahead in November.
Posted by: Adi | May 26, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
And that, Jane, is what will cost him the election.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 26, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
As he well should the screwball won’t get out and she LOSTTTTTTTTTTTTT…
Posted by: o | May 26, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
He has moved on since IN and NC. I wonder about, but do not question his strategy. He sure has taken it to Hillary.
I think Hillary was taking the lead from the Republican Party who were coming after him, so when he moved to the GE he took the wind out of Hillary’s sails.
Puerto Rico has no bearing on the GE no matter what happens.
I also think That Hillary and Obama have their ears focused on the Supers and no more about how they lean then do I and the media, and their campaigns reflect that. It is not the media telling Hillary to drop out, it is those Supers.
The Rules committee is not going to side with Hillary, it would be a disaster for them to do so, there are reasons why both the Republican and Democratic Parties need to keep the States in Check.
Posted by: Thinking | May 26, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
why in the world would PR be included in the Popular vote model? Guam isn’t, the VIrgin Islands aren’t, heck none of the territories are and we all know only some of the caucus states are included…just another example of the HRC spin machine making you reporters look stupid and buying into her talking points
and besides like Ickes, Terry Mc, and of course HRC have said…THIS IS A DELEGATE CONTEST
Posted by: Rich, Orlando | May 26, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Simpson,
FACT CHECK!
Obama leads Clinton 33 primaries to 18
Obama has 1974 with 314.5 super Ds
Hillary has 1782 with 282.5 super Ds
Without super delegates:
Obama has 1660 delegates
Clinton has 1460 delegates.
take the super delegates away and clinton is still losing by 200 delegates.
Obama held public office for 11 years
Hillary for 6 years
Popular vote truth:
Popular Vote Total
16,685,941 49.1% 16,227,514 47.7% Obama +458,427 +1.4%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,020,025 49.1% 16,451,376 47.5% Obama +568,649 +1.6%
Popular Vote (w/FL) 17,262,155 48.3% 17,098,500 47.8% Obama +163,655 +0.5%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,596,239 48.3% 17,322,362 47.6% Obama +273,877 +0.7%
No one is stealing anything from Clinton she has lost fair and square!
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Of course that Obama has his sight in the General Election. Everyone, except the Clintons, kown that Obama is the nominee. All the party is doing is to let everyone vote, so no one says that Hillary was pushed out, and then reality sets in: Obama is the nominee. Just as Joe Biden, who has not endorsed anyone, said: On June 3rd Ms. Clinton has tough accounting. Even James Carville and George Stephanopolous admit it publicly: It’s over for Hillary. Her only hope to “shock the system,” as James Carville put it, was an upset in North Carolina or Oregon, which did not happen.
The people of the party already made up their minds. They just letting her finish but the outcome is not going to change. The party always nominates the candidate with the majority of pledge delegates. Primaries in both parties, republican and democrat, are delegate races. This is a reality that Senator Clinton cannot change. The Democratic Party prefers to lose an election than to lose the party.
Posted by: carl29 | May 26, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I keep hearing Hillary supporters say they will vote for McCain if Hillary doesn’t get the nomination. Who cares! Barack is a millionaire. He won’t suffer under McCain. You poor, racist, uneducated Hillary supporters will have to hawk your wares at pawn shops and yard sales to survive under McCain. He will send some of your children to Iraq to get their heads and limbs blown off. Just like Bush, McCain won’t give any of you the time of day if he is elected. If you want to bite off your noses to spite your faces, go ahead.
Posted by: Barnie | May 26, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Only Clinton can win the big states ?
FACT CHECK:
Latest poll of polls real clear politics:
CAN OBAMA WIN THE BIG STATES:
National Obama +2.8 Clinton +1.5
Pennsylvania Obama +5.8 Clinton +11.7
Ohio Obama +1.3 Clinton +8.3
Wisconsin Obama +1.6 McCain +3.4
Virginia McCain +1.3 McCain +10.4
Florida McCain +8.3 Clinton +3.0
California Obama +11.5 Clinton +11.3
Obama wins some she loses
Clinton wins some he loses
Naionly Obama wins by more:
National Obama +2.8 Clinton +1.5
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
yes he is smart and sensible .Clinton has been holding up the show for weeks now, with all her drama..
It is time for decisive action ..Reality calls.
Will some people think this is smug of him.? .The Clinton folk .. not th sharpest tools in the shed!.. rather loose an election and send sons to die in an unwinnable war.. than admit defeat.
Posted by: rosemary | May 26, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
He is arrogant and someone should tell him that this is still a democratic country where the people decide not Obama. What is the point of the last three primaries—just tell the millions of people that they do not need to vote—Obama is the nominee and even in Hillary Clinton with the next primary has more populous votes than Obama even without including Florida the 4th largest state in the Union (which voted heavily for Clinton)everyone should just pack up and let the youngster start to teach Americans that they no longer have the great society.
Posted by: Anne | May 26, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
The difference is that Clinton is playing by a new set of rules (let’s get as many votes as we can, including Puerto Rican votes that won’t count for the general election) because she lost by the real rules (delegates). Why would Obama waste his time playing a game he has already won? And why would the superdelegates think he’s doing the wrong thing?
Jake, did you lose money on this election?
Posted by: Robby | May 26, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Is it presumptuous for Obama to be campaigning as if it was the national race for President?
….Not at all…. Didn’t y’all hear Carter send Hillary the message? Obama did.
Carter said, give it up after June 3 Hillary and then gracefully exit stage left….
Moreover, with the implication, if she does not….
Suffer the embarrassment of a mass move of the super delegates to Obama locking up the nomination for Obama…..
Posted by: Frank Venice | May 26, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
10:29:57 Barnie, We are so glad you approve. Just think-all those votes going to McCain. Right now who is happier to count all the votes? The DNC or John McCain? You can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 26, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
He has to get this job done. He has got to get out there and start working the campaign, this is how he became the front runner int he first place. John McCain’s time alone out there is over.
Posted by: Louis | May 26, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Senator Obama’s magic number to wrap up the nomination is 49 delegates. He has essentially won the nomination so why not move on? He has run a better campaign than Hillary; he has raised more money; he has more pledged delegates, more superdelsgates; more states won…..It seems silly to me that he should just sit and spin his wheels. Moving on is the right thing to do.
Posted by: sandy | May 26, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
just a thought:
the message BHO sent to SD is that race is over, please jump onto my train.
The message to HRC’s supporters, especially in the remaining primary states is – your votes is not important
which group is important in GE, SD or supporters/voters?
Of course, voters!!!
The way BHO is doing just showed how he is desperate, and want to win at any cost.
Posted by: linda | May 26, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Anne the people have decided :
the people have voted for obama 33 to 18
say Clinton won the next 3 its would be 33 to 21 she still loses
Obama leads Clinton 33 primaries to 18
Obama has 1974 with 314.5 super Ds
Hillary has 1782 with 282.5 super Ds
Without super delegates:
Obama has 1660 delegates
Clinton has 1460 delegates.
Obama leads the popular vote even with FL!
Hillary makes all her suporters look stupid by lying to you!
It always a conspiricy withe her !
She is never wrong its always someone elses fault.. She just lost she put up a tough fight but she lost!
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
linda,
What is Hillarys message then ? Ignore the will of the people SD’s and vote for her… thats the only way she could win!
Count states that were told their votes wont count because they broke the rules because it might help her now even though shes on video saying that their “votes wont and dont count”
Her two campaign heads created the rules that striped FL and Michigan of the votes… but now they say they only did it to warn other states not to jump the que ? GIVE ME A BREAK!
Well now even if the doy seat those states they dont change the result Obama will be the winner.
So what is your point really ?
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Jake, just because you don’t know what the committee is going to decide on the 31st, doesn’t mean that they don’t. The Obama team has several supporters on the committee. The number of Clinton supporters on the committee are in the minority. His team has consistently out maneauvered, out strategized, and out smarted the Clinton machine since Iowa. You’re foolish to think that somehow that will change now. And duh, there is no official “popular vote” Jake, this is a Delegate race. Don’t you read? Popular vote tallies aren’t even kept in several caucus states. Obviously you subscribe to the Clinton’s delusional “only certain states(especially the ones they won) count” theory. If you really believe the so-called “popular vote” will sway the superdelegates to endorse that self-serving power grubbing entitlement troll, then you don’t deserve to have a blog. There will be no “game changers” Jake. The Fat Lady is singing. Dry your tears and let it go. Your girl’s a Loser.
Posted by: Scott | May 26, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
And to Frank Venice-The Democratic leaders couldn’t possibly hurt Hillary Clinton any more than they already have. I guess you know nothing about how politics work. When the leaders “tell” their “people” what to do-they do it. Because if they don’t they get “punished.” They won’t get their bills passed, they won’t get money for their district, they won’t get financial backing for their own campaigns or someone else will be chosen to oppose them. So when they are told by their “leaders” to vote for something or someone, they do it or suffer the consequences. This nomination was decided a long, long time ago and The price the leaders will pay will be the GE.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 26, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
RL in Illinois: Is this the part where the theme song from X-Files is played?
Posted by: ted | May 26, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
RL in Illinois,
The people have voted and Clinton lost..
The message they are sending to Clinton is that they will not overife the will of the people.. Even for a Clinton
They are telling her Obama has won the most states the most votes and the most pledged delegates so its over… on June third they will all get behind the winner Obama
If she had been the winner Obama would be told the same thing !
There is no trick here she just plain lost!
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Obama is no different that any other politician. Is this the “change” we can believe in.
Let people you know or do your own contacting that Obama is trying to bribe (and its legal) super delegates whose districts have gone for Clinton to vote for him. The following web sites one shows all the super delegates who have received campaign contributions from Obama
and another site that lists all the super delegates who are uncommitted and let them know they are being watched and any who votes for Obama if Clinton wins the popular vote (and there have been some since w.Va who have done so) will be in trouble in their re-election bids.
http://giveemhell.org/superdelegates.htm
Obama’s Super Delegates & Money Machine
Posted by: jessica | May 26, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
He’s being arrogant and presumptous. As a Hillary supporter he will have to win back if he is the nominee, I can tell you that his actions rub the Hillary Democrats the wrong way. Be gracious. Finish out the primaries in the primary states. And then focus on the general. There’s certainly no harm in campaigning in the remaining states and still focusing his stump speech on McCain, which is what Hillary has been doing for the most part. Is his one day in NM right now going to give him the edge in the fall against McCain? Doubtful.
Posted by: rachel | May 26, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
I spoke to someone at the DNC today and she assured me the votes in MI and FL will be counted. I told them I will never give the DNC another dime unless they are. Howard Dean has strategized on a 50-state campaign since becoming chair of the DNC. He had no other choice. The game will change next week for sure.
Never never ever Hussein, if not Hillary, then vote McCain.
Posted by: grace | May 26, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Grace: The votes will probably be counted in full…..Obama will still win regardles….secondly, how dare you call yourself a Dem, when all your doing is using Republican tactics? No one is begging you for your support or money so quit using threats.
Posted by: ted | May 26, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
rachel,
He is campaigning in those states with contests left but he is also looking up the voters he needs to win the general Election he is going to the places that McBush hopes to win some support nd locking them away before McBush gets his monet together and goes after them..
Its smart and its no disrespect to Hillary it helps her she can get the race in the final states closer and show to woman that they can compete.. That they could be president !
So I dont get your problem ?
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Hank: Your so naive…..even if FL and MI are counted in full, she still loses….she will win PR by no more than 10 points and Obama will win MT and SD by 15 or more…..she cannot win….however, it is nice, that Obama is going to seal the nomination up on a high point with his wins…..
Posted by: ted | May 26, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
I am probably more emabrassed for Hillary than she is allowing us all to see that she is for herself. She has allowed her team to move her from her original objective that is ‘TO CHANGE THIS COUNTRY’. 200-plus years of one societal memebr’s ideology has finally smeared mud on all of us and with her getting as close as she has says America is changing. Bill was on point in defending her as he carfully did not attack Obama; hence trying to secure a VP seat for Hillary. But follwing her teams’ lead into the abyss of old world politics i.e. character assasinations, trying to change the rules in hopes that the changed results will be benefical, is insulting and embarassing. I preach Hillary’s accomplishments to my 17 year old daughter. If I could speak to her I would tell her HILLARY STOP IT..Unfortunately this is where we are yet our nation can and will be changed especially if you refocus and get back on point. America is ready for you but more ready for Obama.
Posted by: Tommy | May 26, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I live in Chicago and voted Obama to the Senate. Having been there three years he has done absolutely nothing. Even critical votes when BP refinery wanted to dump more waste in Lake Michigan he was not there when he did vote he simply voted “present.” What he did do in that time frame was write a book, visit his homeland Africa (on the taxpayers dime) and plan for and run for president
He has ill-served Illinois and I believe he will ill-serve the USA I have no reason to believe otherwise. He has done absolutely nothing to get the top job in the world. he has no credential other than being uber liberal and black.
never never ever Hussein, if not Hillary, then vote McCain.
Posted by: Jessica | May 26, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I’m a Hillary supporter who will be voting for McCain in the Fall. And I know many others who feel the same way. Obama is a divisive candidate. HE has divided us. And if he and his supporters think that Hillary’s supporters will just fall in line. Think again. We will be throwing our support to John McCain.
Posted by: deb | May 26, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Jessica- if you truly live in Chicago look up Senator Obama’s legislative record in your state and then look up what he HAS accomplished as a Senator. Empty words and accussations accomplish nothing – do your research!
Posted by: sandy | May 26, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
jessica,
withouth they super delegates Obama is still winning so whay is your point ?
PS How old is you baby ? Boy or girl ?
Obama leads Clinton 33 primaries to 18
Obama has 1974 with 314.5 super Ds
Hillary has 1782 with 282.5 super Ds
Without super delegates:
Obama has 1660 delegates
Clinton has 1460 delegates.
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
deb: When gas is at $8.00 a gallon, Roe vs. Wade has been overturned, and we are at war with Iran, I hope you give yourself a pat on the back and say “nice job.”
Posted by: ted | May 26, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
In Obamas first year:
Once elected, Obama gained bipartisan support for legislation reforming ethics and health care laws.
He sponsored a law increasing tax credits for low-income workers, negotiated welfare reform, and promoted increased subsidies for childcare.
Obama also led the passage of legislation mandating videotaping of homicide interrogations, and a law to monitor racial profiling by requiring police to record the race of drivers they detained.
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Democrats lose every 4 years,because
they nominate the most un-electable
ultra left wing liberals.
This year it will be worst because
the nominee is black.
Party leaders do not learn any lessons
from their mistakes.
Posted by: Nicholas | May 26, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Even Oprah’s rating going down after she endorsed Obama. I love it.
Posted by: Jessica | May 26, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Maybe Hillary should stay in until Sept.
We all know Katrina struck New Orleans during the month of Sept. Right?
Posted by: kelly | May 26, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
And he STILL cant seal the deal.
Posted by: andrea | May 26, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
I don’t know, Ted. I never watched that show. No, Ted, this is the part where the other half does not vote for Obama. This is the part where Those of us who liked John McCain more than John Kerry, think Kerry would have won if McCain had agreed to VP as Kerry asked. If the Obama supporters are are so confident that their candidate has won, they should have NO problem counting the rest of the primaries. Right?
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 26, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Wishful thinking on the part of Hillary’s supporters? ? It is a done deal – face the inevitable and get on with your life. If you cannot handle an Obama presidency, fine, but it seems that Obama faces reality and problems head-on. Unfortunately, Hillary and her supporters digress every day as her campaign winds down to an end.
Posted by: sandy | May 26, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
delegates are what matter, states won are what matter, this is how BILL CLINTON won his nomination, its how Al Gore, John Kerry, won the nomination…
you cant just change the rules because you are losing…
why did she agree to not count the votes?
Why did it take her months to want to count the votes?
When she finally wanted to start counting all the votes who was ahead in Delegates, States won, Super Delegates, and Popular Vote?
Why did she think that the primaries would be over on feb 5th?
Why does she hold the second highest (only to george bush) disapproval rating?
Why is she allowed to say her assassination quote was a slight misspeak when she said it 4 different occasions?
Why does she not tell the whole truth that Bill Clinton and Robert Kennedy werent in contention for winning the primaries they had those contests all but sewed up.
Why if we are suppose to forgive her Assassination comment when she ran ads attack obama for his bitter comment?
Why did she resort to Republican attack ads to try to take down Obama and still lose?
Why did she lie four times about Bosnia?
Why a few weeks ago they were telling Obama if he couldnt stand the heat to get out of hte kitchen, and now today they both are complaining that this whole thing has been unfair?
This isnt the first time they have complained about unfair this or that, then came back and say nah we arent complaining were winning, and now were back here again with them saying there has been a coverup?
Why are we hearing about this cover up now that we are closing in on the end of the primaries instead of months ago?
Why before Feb 5th was Hillary way up in the polls to win, she was the strongest candidate, she had the most money, she was winning all the primaries, and now finds herself trying to play catchup?
Why does she continue to say she is the strongest candidate when she is losing?
Oh its because she is winning big states swing states… but in all those states we are now seeing obama taking commanding leads?
They say they dont watch polls, then they do, then they dont, now they do
Why if they are the strongest candidate is their campaign in financial ruin?
WHile obama continue to register people, and continues to break records on donors, and the amount of donations he is getting?
If all those people that voted for her arent putting their cash for her, and obamas are what does that tell us?
It is all smoke and mirrors with these people…
I have lost all respect for hillary and bill, and this is why i support obama
Posted by: bhrandon | May 26, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
RL in Illinois: Count the rest of the primaries…..I don’t care…..I never said they shouldn’t count….
Posted by: ted | May 26, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
To answer Jake’s question:
I think it is presumptuous and arrogant of Obama. As a Hillary supporter, I think it is great. If I supported Obama, I would think it stupid.
Perhaps Obama already knows the fix is in before the Rules Comm. meets. I do hope that is not true.
I think Obama forgets how close this race really is. He is believing the MSM!! Yikes!
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 26, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
RL in Illinois – no, Obama’s supporters have no problem with the delegates still to be counted – they are in Senator Obama’s corner as it is. But for Hillary’s camp to stress that she should have all of the delegates or the majority of the delegates in MI is ridiculous. Guess, it does not matter when it really comes down to it – she still loses.
Posted by: sandy | May 26, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
sandy,
But Hillary keeps winning primaries, you forget!!
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 26, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
What part of the US primary election process does Hillary not understand. The winner is simply the candidates who accummulates more delegates than his/her opponents. It doesn’t matter whether the delegates came from small states or big states! No explanations are necessary!As it stands, Barack has all but locked this one. Period!America is democracy–candidates are free to campaign in any state, at any stage, as they judge most effective to the presidential bid.
Posted by: steve j | May 26, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Jessica: get your facts straight….no Dem has won the White House with only the white vote since LBJ….Clinton did not win because he got the majority of the white vote…..he won because of the AA vote…..which Hillary Clinton will never get…..get your facts straight next time!
Posted by: ted | May 26, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Obama,booooooooooo ! Drop out already ! Hillary has the popular vote to win in the general election.For him to be campaigning like he’s the nominee is just making himself an enemy to all Hillary supporters and he will never receive their votes in a general election.He is not going to win without the popular votes.If he’s the nominee then all Hillary supporters will probably write in
a Hillary vote.Obama running for President is a loss cause.
Posted by: janis | May 26, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
countallthevotes,
Even with Fl michigan and the 3 remaing contest Hillary can win give them all to her she still loses what part of that dont you get ?
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
bhrandon – great post – you nailed it! :)
Posted by: sandy | May 26, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
janis,
HILLARY DOESNT HAVE THE POPULAR VOTE ITS BS:
Popular vote truth:
Popular Vote Total
16,685,941 49.1% 16,227,514 47.7% Obama +458,427 +1.4%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,020,025 49.1% 16,451,376 47.5% Obama +568,649 +1.6%
Popular Vote (w/FL) 17,262,155 48.3% 17,098,500 47.8% Obama +163,655 +0.5%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,596,239 48.3% 17,322,362 47.6% Obama +273,877 +0.7%
No one is stealing anything from Clinton she has lost fair and square!
Posted by: Kate | May 26, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Janis: Get a life…Clinton only leads in the popular vote if Obama gets zero votes in MI and if you exclude the results in Maine, Iowa, Nevada, and Washington, which deleated their results…..once again, get a life.
Posted by: ted | May 26, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
janis -no not ALL Hillary supporters will write in her name or vote for McCain – not all of Hiillary’s supporters have lost their marbles – any see a very clear prefrence to Senator obama ver Mccain -
Posted by: sandy | May 26, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
ted:
Do you really think that the only people who are voting for Hillary are women over 60?
And I’ll add mine and couple of my friends for good luck.
Well, hold that thought when they take their decrepit minds and bodies and those of their equally decrepit friendand associates over to the sunny side of the street to get away from B O.
I’ll add my vote for a little added flavor…
Also, the folks at Barnaby’s and Borders’, some of the guys at the
U of I, and about half of the employees at the company for which I work will be joining them!
And I’m sure there are more voters who are equally disgusted with the undemocratic ways of the democratic party who are equaly vehement in their opinions.
The delegates BO has are for the most part B O U H G H T!
Our votes have /are being sold to the highest bidder!
Is this the kind of change you could expect from B O should he win?
G-d Forgive!
Hillary is still in the race!
My vote is still for her!
Should she lose, my vote will go the the other party.
COUNT ON IT!
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY!
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: questioner | May 26, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Obama is as empty of gravitas as empty
can be. Hillary is full of something,
but it isn’t likeability…..in her own
party. Dems have a problem. They know
it. The most enjoyable part of this
fiasco is red-faced Bill on the stump
explaining why the party is dissing
his protege while trying to pretend
he still runs the show. Dumping Bill
and Hill is one slamma jamma for the
united Dems.
Posted by: hombre | May 26, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Presumptious, yes, and arrogant, yes. And unfortunately, arrogance is one of his perceived problems with voters, so he’s not helping himself there. I think his intended audience, though, is superdelegates.
Posted by: Dana in MO | May 27, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Sandy-You are not from Chicago if you say Obama has a “legislative record.” It’s you that hasn’t done the research. Please list all the bills he wrote and passed-you can’t include the ones he co-sponsored because they ALL do that. You can’t include the bills that were handed to him by Emil Jones. None on the list?
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
I’ll vote for the Dem nominee regardless.
I think anyone that will vote for McSame just to spite Obama is a moron. Anyone that wants 4 more years of this war and economy needs to have their head examined.
Posted by: Gary_Philly | May 27, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
questioner: You should have read my posting before you started ranting and raving…..I said he won all the categories except women over 60 in the state of OREGON…….as for Obama buying the delegates?… someone please play the X-Files theme song….
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
“It’s useful to win states, but states don’t vote — delegates do,” said Harold Ickes, who is heading up the delegate operation for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.
“This is very much a race for delegates at this point,” said Ickes, a longtime Clinton insider and aide to President Bill Clinton.
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
A man wrapped up in himself makes a very small bundle.
Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: Jessica | May 27, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
can people just accept the reality that Hillary lost? She was defeated fair and square by a younger smarter opponent. Just call it what it is please.
And for those Dems that will jump to McCain I say that’s fine, no love loss. After all you will need to make up that huge deficit of conservatives (some 25%) that hates McCain and will not vote in Nov.
Posted by: rgregory | May 27, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
countallthevotes – she can win all theree of the next primaries but she will never garnish the percentages she needs to even slow Senator Obama down. His magic number is only 49 pledged or superdelegates to wrap up the nomination, not counting those delegates still to come as they have in recent days, moved for Hillary’s camp to Obama’s. Plus, he will still win delegates in the next three primaries – it is a done deal. What don’t you people get about this?
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Jessica: You said you voted for Obama for senate, and now you will vote for Hillary or mccain…..you do realize that Obama will win his homestate in the general don’t you?
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
He that lives upon hope will die fasting.
Benjamin Franklin
Posted by: Jessica | May 27, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Sandy, winning? Winning is measured by the total number of delegates one has accummulated.
Posted by: steve J | May 27, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Obama BETTER move on to the general
election…….before the Clinton
machine makes an offer he can’t refuse.
Posted by: hombre | May 27, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
Ah, but Sandy, I’m referring to actual votes not delegates.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
In a two-candidate race, it’s going to be very hard to deliver a knockout blow with elected delegates,” Ickes said. “On the other hand, once someone gets a serious lead in delegates, it’s going to be very hard to overtake them.”
Harold LeClair Ickes is an adviser to Senator Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
RL in Illinois: Clinton only leads in the popular vote if Obama gets zero votes in MI and if you exclude the results in Maine, Iowa, Nevada, and Washington, which deleated their results…..
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
jessica,
it really seems the democratic party’
main goal was to beat sen. clinton.
but yes you are correct, they will not
win the white house, and they will try to blame the clintons.
when you really think about it, it is as sad time for our country.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Ted, you must have a thing for the X-Files song.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
RL in Illinois: It is great music….but I only mention it to make a point when people become delusional and start mentioning conspiracies without any facts to back up their claims.
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Brian–you need to go back to kindergarten and learn respect. Senator Clinton is the better candidate and has the most popular votes at this time. Your Senator Obama has been losing voters every day that voted for him before including four in my family and at least 10 friends. Most changed their minds after they found out he was buying the superdelegates by pledging funds for their reelection. Obama and Rev. Wright have the same faith and beliefs and that does not impress rational voters. He is a racist and a socialist.
Posted by: Martin | May 27, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Kelly:
Actually Hurricane Katrina struck inv August, which is when the Democratic Convention in Denver is……
So yes, she really should stay in until them, by all means………………..
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
count all the votes:
Damn straight she’s been winning primaries!
So how come the press keeps all this good news under wraps? I had to track down the BBC to find the enormous percentages with which she won West Virginia and Kentucky!
How come her wins are not as newsworthy as B O’s? Certainly his percentages were not as newsworthy as hers!
And she lost Guam by one vote…. but they think it was a miscount!
This whole election has been a travesty.
It would have been nice if we still had free press!
The thought that B O has gotten this far
with all his negative associations is appalling
I admire your calm. ;-)
I admire Hillary!
I will not vote for B O ever!
Posted by: questioner | May 27, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Conspiracies?
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Brian:Clinton only leads in the popular vote if Obama gets zero votes in MI and if you exclude the results in Maine, Iowa, Nevada, and Washington, which deleated their results…..seems like your eating up everything that she throws out to you….do the math, and if your not good at it, get someone to do it for you.
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Sandy, My point is as a state senator, he did nothing. And by the way, Rezko is not over.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Its unbelievable how racist all those Clinton supporters who would vote for McCain are? The reason I’m saying this is Hillary and Obama don’t have a lot of policy differences, but when compared with McCain, each of these two have huge differences with McCain. I can’t think of any other plausable explanation for this phenomenon. I’m not sure how of an impact this will have, but its the most racist thing I have ever heard.
Posted by: steve J | May 27, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
RL in Illinois: Yes, conspiracies because her supporters are saying that they heard that he was buying delegates….yet they have no proof.
Questioner: The media has only been ignoring her wins recently because she won KY and WV which are REPUBLICAN and Obama won OR which is DEMOCRAT….
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Ted, That’s not conspiracies, that’s politics.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Obama leads Clinton 33 primaries to 18
Obama leads Clinton in pledged delegates
Without super delegates:
Obama has 1660 delegates
Clinton has 1460 delegates
Obama has 1974 with 314.5 super Ds
Hillary has 1782 with 282.5 super Ds
Popular vote truth:
Popular Vote Total
16,685,941 49.1% 16,227,514 47.7% Obama +458,427 +1.4%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,020,025 49.1% 16,451,376 47.5% Obama +568,649 +1.6%
Popular Vote (w/FL) 17,262,155 48.3% 17,098,500 47.8% Obama +163,655 +0.5%
Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,596,239 48.3% 17,322,362 47.6% Obama +273,877 +0.7%
No one is stealing anything from Clinton she has lost fair and square!
GET A GRIP !!!!
WHINE ALL YOU WANT !! YOU LOOK CRAZY!
CLINTON CAN ONLY WIN IF WE CHANGE THE RULES SO THE PERSON WHO HAS LOST THE MOST IS THE WINNER !
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Sandy: Your son is in my prayers.
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
RL in Illinois – give it up already. Your unsubtantiated arguments do nothing for you. And, yes, Retzko is over! Better duck for cover when the Paul vs. Clinton trial comes up.
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
ted – thank you. David has already completely lost his hearing – he faces deafness for the rest of his life. But the marince Corps needs warm bodies in Iraq so he is still there.
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Just imagine what Bill and Hillary would have been doing had they been as far ahead as Obama is?
Posted by: steve J | May 27, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
What everyone here who is arguing about Puerto Rico, South Dakota and Montana seem to forget is:
1) The DNC Committee is holding their meeting on May 31st, the day before the Puerto Rico Primary, and three days before Montana and South Dakota.
2) At the very LEAST, the committee will probably agree to seat at least HALF of the delegates from Florida and Michigan, because if I remember hearing correctly what the DNC rules on this subject are, HALF is all they can legally strip the states of delegate-wise.
3) This means that when the Puerto Rico, Montana and South Dakota primaries are held,Obama’s “Magic” number will no longer be 2026, but a somewhat higher number.
4) And whatever that number is, even if Obama does win both Montana and South Dakota, it is HIGHLY doubtful that he will get anywhere close to the new “Magic” number following the last of the primaries on June 3rd.
5) Which means this race will then probably be going to the floor of the Democratic Convention in August, and once it gets there, ANYTHING can happen.
6) Shall I place the famous Yogi Berra quote here???
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
steve J – Senator Obama only needs 49 more pledged or superdelegates to win the nomination. Some of those delegates he will win in the primaries still to come. Superdelgates move into his corner on a daily basis. What is it about that that you do not understand?
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
And she lost Guam by one vote…. but they think it was a miscount!
questioner
—————————————
Yeah Cry baby, 33+ states miscount too?
No may be You cannot count how many states she lost!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | May 27, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
CAN OBAMA WIN THE BIG STATES:
Real politics says yes !
I LOVE HOW CLINTON SUPORTERS FIND ONE POLL AND RUN PUSH IT LIKES IT MEANS THE WORLD,
REAL POLITICS POLL OF ALL POLLS May 25 08:
National Obama +2.8 Clinton +1.5
Pennsylvania Obama +5.8 Clinton +11.7
Ohio Obama +1.3 Clinton +8.3
Wisconsin Obama +1.6 McCain +3.4
Virginia McCain +1.3 McCain +10.4
Florida McCain +8.3 Clinton +3.0
California Obama +11.5 Clinton +11.3
For those who have trouble reading Obama wins by more !
Both win states and lose some both beat mccain!
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
I’m sure that the members of the DNC Rules Committee have been talking amongst themselves and that it’s already been decided what to do. They’re all Democrats and friends. They’ve clearly decided on a scenario that all but gives the nomination to Obama. The Committee has to make it look as if they’re still weighing all sides, but most likely, as politicians do, they’ve talked and caucused already to work out all the details. Only with that knowledge could Obama blow off the rest of the primaries. But at the least, it does come off as arrogant, and the states he passed over will remember his slight come November if the fix is in, as I suspect it is, and if Hillary supporters fall into line.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 27, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Sandy, sorry for your son. I’m also sorry that these kids will not be coming home soon no matter who gets elected. The entire region would explode. It’s a bad, bad deal, but no matter who you vote for, there will be no immediate pullout-it’s not right, but it’s the truth. Sorry.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
SandyB – ah! but enough superdelegates will also be in Senator Obama’s corner to tilt the balance to remain still in his favor. The party will not allow a convention fight – it almost destroyed the party the last go-around. Superdelegates move into Senator Obama’s camp continually – I do not see that same migration to Hillary. Dream as you may – it is over.
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
The DNC can give Hillary everything from Michigan and FL
AND SHE STILL CANT WIN!
WHAT PART OF THAT DONT YOU GET ?
Give Hillary all the remiming 3 contests and SHE STILL CANT WIN
OBAMA Needs 49 delegates of any kind and its over !
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Since when is Rezko over with???
Did the verdict come in over the holiday weekend and the media missed it??
From what I have read in numerous media outlets, the Rezko indictments were only the first in a long line of indictments left to come………….
From what I understand, Obama’s name was on that prosecuting U.S. Attorney’s “SHORT LIST.”
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Florida and Michigan may still be seated in full. One thing, however, you may not do in a game is move the goal post…it would be a sorry affront to fair play to change the number of delegates required to bag the nomination. These delegates may count in full all they want, but the first to reach 2026 is the winner.
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
He is very arrogant and thinks he can win GE election easily and Hillary’s supporters will vote for him. He thinks he is better than McCain to solve the iraq war and economy with his empty suite. All Hillary’s supporters rather vote for an experience candidate. He tries to distort McCain = Bush but voters are not dumb to believe him.
Posted by: stephanie | May 27, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Sandy, my arguments are documented. The jury is still out in the Rezko trial.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
guam was won by 7 votes
and the conspiracy where someones backers were tyring to buy off super delegates…
that would be clintons people…
One of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s top financial supporters offered $1 million to the Young Democrats of America during a phone conversation in which he also pressed for the organization’s two uncommitted superdelegates to endorse the New York Democrat, a high-ranking official with YDA told The Huffington Post.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/19/superdelegates-turned-dow_n_102450.html
Posted by: bhrandon | May 27, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
I like comments I read. I do like everyone I quickly go through all the comments to gauge how the article or opinion is being received. It sometimes pains me to see how the truth gets distorted.
Comments such as Barack Obama divided the party. I then wonder how other people process information.
Although I am more conservative than Barack, I think Barack took nothing for guaranteed in this campaign; he came this far by careful planning. HRC had this thing wrapped by Feb 5, 2008. I guess after 2/5 the HRC they got more appetite for campaigning.
As a Republican who is still undecided whether to vote for Dems this year; I see why my friends think the liberals are absolutely crazy. They have this tendency to fight each other. Liberals like power and they are too ambitious. Look at the GOP it united under a different kind of a conservative.
Posted by: lu | May 27, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Rezo is over – get over it already for goodness sake – the trial is done, the verdict only affects Rezko – set your sites on Paul vs. Clinton instead.
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
lu,
I honestly believe in this election Obama will get more rational republican then some close-minded democrats and together he will achieve great success in this great nation!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | May 27, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am
Lu: Regardless of whether you vote Dem or Republican, I believe that you are a sensible person from what you said in your post.
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
RL in Illinois – I know a vote for McCain means I will probably never get to hug my son again – he has beaten the odds so many times already. At least with a Democrat in the White House I can hope that my son will come home.
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Anyone who thinks that the Rezko verdict will only affect Rezko is deluding themselves.
Of course, it’s the indictments that follow that will prove more interesting.
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Sandy: You are a brave person…..more brave than I could ever be…..STAY STRONG!
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
bhrandon ”
The gentleman accused of soliciting that bid has denied doing so.
I’m talking about the MANY “bought” delegates “OUT THERE”.
And yes, it matters to the outcome of this election…..BUT SINCE WHEN ARE OUR VOTES UP FOR SALE?
How did this come about?
What ever happened to Democracy, and one vote per citizen?
If this doesn’t concern you, then this country is in deeper distress than we thought!
Posted by: questioner | May 27, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
To all the realists that understand this nomination will be over soon who should Obama choose to be his VP ?
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
sandy,
I hope and pray your son come home safely as will my friends. It is time to change Shock and Aww with expense of our beloved countrymen by the people who never think how mothers and fathers feel for their sons and daughters!
Be strong and you are in the right track!
Posted by: RC | May 27, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
jacksmith,
Hillary has lost fair and square its time to move on… Operation chaos ring a bell ?
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
Kate: I would love it if he chose Gov. Sebilius, although I know that some Clinton supporters will whine about it…..my second choice would be Hagel….I believe that Webb would be better suited to stay in his senate seat….Obama better not choose Ed Rendell becuase he’s worse than Clinton!
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Kate – the possibilites are endless it would seem – certainly many suggestions out there – my first choices would be Webb or Hagel, but I believe Senator Obama will make the wisest choice regardless of all of our speculation. :)
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Wesley Clark for VP (My dream VP candidate). He is a Hillary supporter but he is a fine gentleman!
OBAMA/CLARK 08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | May 27, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
ted – think you have a good point – Webb has the military credentials but another senator on the ticket may not be the best choice…there ae also many female candidates Senator Obama could choose from – Sebilius is one for sure.
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
jacksmith i think you meant to say the republicans have been voting for hillary
since THATS WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN DOING
they would love to run against hillary….they have the play book on her already written, with obama its too different they dont know what the hell to do
they see a crowd of 75k show up for him and they crap their pants, and have to try to say a popular band is what brought those people out…
let me tell you as an oregonian, no one especially 75k people (more then rolling stones concerts) dont show up to a decemberists show…
maybe 75 lol they cant sell out a bar
Posted by: bhrandon | May 27, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Sandy, once again, I stand by my comment 12:39:23. Kate: I think this is just a game to you.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Bill Richardson would be another good choice as would Chris Dodd…..Although I am not a fan of Joe Biden, he wouldn’t be bad either…..the one thing that I do know is that choosing Edwards would be a huge error.
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
ted – I do love Edwards but I would rather see him as the AG rather than on the ticket.
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
bhrandon,
In NC, I went for an OBAMA event ticket, they were gone within 2 hours!
It is a movement, very hard to compete against. Hillary tried very hard but it was not just her time this year!
OBAMA08! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | May 27, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
For me its
Gov. Sebilius
Webb
Richardson
There my top three…
I think Obama should name who will be in his cabinet before the election and
Haggel should be SEC. DEFENCE to get us out of this dumb war!
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Obama isn’t the nominee. He needs to stop pretending and face the possibility that this will probably go to the convention. The people aren’t fooled by these games.
Posted by: Karen | May 27, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am
Bill Richardson (my traitorous governor for whom I will NEVER support in an election again), would only stab Obama in the back like he did Hillary…..
If he has any brains in his head at all, he would choose someone other than him.
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Sandy:I hadn’t thought of the whole 2 senator thing….I just think that Webb would be more effective in getting Virginia to go to Obama’s side in the fall…..personally, I think that Claire Mccaskill of MO would be great as either a VP or cabinet member….
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
No jpt, Obama is neither being arrogant nor pragmatic…my observation is that you yourself are being suggestive and inciting…like an ill wind that does nobody any good.
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Karen,
Yep he will go to convention with most delegates to confirm his nomination and to thank Hillary for her hard work and support.
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | May 27, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Why, Kate, 1:00:46 “operation chaos?”…You are a Republican.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
RC – same here – the tickets are gone before one can almost take a breath. Senator Obama was in my state today in a beautiful mountain setting – the turnout for him was overwhelming!
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
I don’t know what it is, but there is something about Gov. Sebelius that is so classy and Presidential-like….I do hope that if she isn’t chosen as VP she gets a spot in the cabinet as Sec. of State?…..I certianly wish she was gov. of my state.
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
ted: “personally, I think that Claire Mccaskill of MO would be great as either a VP or cabinet member….”
Are you talking about the same Claire McCaskill who has the poor judgment to go on several programs saying that her teenage daughter was in her face, calling her a slug and saying that she was ashamed of her if she didn’t support Obama? The same McCaskill who said that Obama’s famous race speech showed that he was the first AA speaking to us as a leader, not a victim? Of course, that was kept pretty much out of the media.
Anyway, doesn’t sound like a very good choice to me. In fact, she shouldn’t have another term as Senator.
Posted by: cappamore | May 27, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Re: “Bill Richardson (my traitorous governor for whom I will NEVER support in an election again), would only stab Obama in the back like he did Hillary…..”
I’m a Hillary supporter, but that whole “Judas” thing was ridiculous. Richardson doesn’t Hillary anything just because he worked in Bill Clinton’s Cabinet. Richardson did a job well done and that’s all any Cabinet member owes the country.
Furthermore, Richardson had a diistinguished political career long before he served in the Cabinet. The Clintons treated him terribly.
Posted by: Karen | May 27, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
ted – McCaskill is another good choice. And I agree, Webb could help a great deal in getting Virginia to go for Obama. Webb holds a special place inmyheart – he camapigned in his son’s combat boots – he is one of the few members of Congress who actually has a child serving in the war.
Posted by: sandy | May 27, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Hillary should be Sec of Health to help pass the Universal Health care system!
Webb Sec of Defense!
Edwards AG!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | May 27, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Karen: “I’m a Hillary supporter, but that whole “Judas” thing was ridiculous. Richardson doesn’t Hillary anything just because he worked in Bill Clinton’s Cabinet. ”
The way I understand it, there was a lot more to the Judas reference than that. Richardson was deceitful about what he was going to do and even told Bill C. that he would not endorse Obama – on more than one occasion.
Posted by: cappamore | May 27, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Olympia Snow would also be great because she is a moderate conservative who is famous for getting things done in the Senate….she was named one of America’s top 10 senators in TIME magazine in 2006.
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Finally somebody agreed this whole thing is to convince everyone, especially the media, the 200 plus uncommited superdelegates to say this ia all over.
Posted by: catleya | May 27, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell both D-Washington State would also be two great female choices,although I doubt that they will be chosen.
Posted by: ted | May 27, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
My dear democrat,are we campaigning for the nomination or associnations?I think IT is arogant to keep on campaign because your planning is to kill some one rather then focusing on the agenda.Hilary, as one of your supporter you had disapointed me and now It is time to give up the political fight and go on associnations planning. Shame on you Hilary
Posted by: NY,G | May 27, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Are you not familiar with The Eleventh Commandment:
“Thou shalt not watch the Super Bowl on Super Sunday with anyone whose spouse you do not plan on supporting……”
But seriously,
I am not saying that Richardson has not accomplished some wonderful things. He has, especially diplomacy wise, and I voted for him in both of his gubernatorial races….
I’m talking about ethics and character. This man was another one who went around saying several months ago that the superdelegates (including himself), should support the will of their constituents.
Last time I checked, Hillary won the New Mexico primary (Richardson’s constituents who elected him twice), not Obama, but yet he turns around and endorses Obama. This was the complete opposite of what he stated a superdelegate should do.
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
RC,
You are a bit confused. Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic candidate in 2012 if Obama gets selected for ’08. This very thread is a case in point. Obama wants to move to the general before the primary is concluded. I wonder if he remembers to zip up after going to the bathroom each time while he’s still being potty trained. The guy is green behind the ears and McCain is already trouncing him big time.
========================================
Hillary 2008 or Hillary 2012, the lower the year the higher the IQ of the Democratic Party
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 27, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
How many Obama realists think Hillary should have a roll in an obama admin ?
For the Hillary fans if obama offered her the VP (Not likley after her actions) should she accept it ?
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Maybe he believed what Jimmy Carter has said yesterday.
What a surprise if it turnout to be the other way, the uncommited SD not go to him but Hillary.
Posted by: catleya | May 27, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Senator Obama has belittled and insulted two out of three Americans. He does not respect or like white working Americans. He thinks people of his district who have lived on other people taxes all their lives are more worthy, in fact, they are the CHOSEN PEOPLE. Drugs, gangs, murders, and proverty are the mainstays of his district. He is not a uniter but a divider. Obama, go back to your corrupt Chicago. Hillary Clinton is the best candidate for all America.
Posted by: Maria | May 27, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Frustrated?
No, I just have reasonable expectations that my elected officials (especially those for whom I have voted), to keep their word to their constituents.
By not abiding by his own earlier declaration as to what his superdelegate position would be, he has betrayed the trust that I have always had in him.
As I have said before, Mr. Carville was being kind with his Judas reference.
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
From what I have able to ascertain, there has been at least eight primaries or caucuses that have had voting problems. Both in Texas and Nevada, the same people were able vote more than once at caucuses. Most of these were young Obama supporters with nothing else to do and was organized by the Obama campaign. Other primaries, either large numbers of votes were not counted at all or counted twice. Most of these messes are still not the books. Seems primaries aren’t important enought to do right or correctly. Also, how many superdelegates has Obama bought with his $20 million pledge three weeks ago?
Posted by: Marty | May 27, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
SandyB,
Which one is it ??
Clinton says SD’d they can vote their conscience and then you attack richardson for doing that ?
Or is everyone a judus that dosnet vote Clinton ?
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
NY,G 1:29:54
You said you are Hillary supporter?
How’d come you don’t know how to write Hillary’s name?
what is associnations?
Were you talking about the assassination?
Her statement had nothing to do with Obama, it’s historical issue.
She never plan to assassinate Obama.
What are you thinking?
Posted by: catleya | May 27, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Marty what part dont you get ?
She lost because she didnt win thats just how it goes you can say two caucuses where not fair you can say he brought off the supper Ds but the facts dont support it:
Obama leads Clinton 33 primaries to 18
Obama leads Clinton in pledged delegates
Without super delegates:
Obama has 1660 delegates
Clinton has 1460 delegates
Obama has 1974 with 314.5 super Ds
Hillary has 1782 with 282.5 super Ds
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
SandyB, maybe the governor got convinced otherwise, just as everyone has a right to be, and as I hope you yourself would be before all this is over.
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
Marty, you have brought up a good point, especially in regard to caucuses. I don’s understandy why there isn’t more of a discussion about them. The only mainstream kind of reporting I heard on this was NPR’s recording of a Washington State caucus — woman supporting Clinton gets up to talk about Hillary, her son standing by her side. The Obama people wouldn’t let her speak, heckled her, “We want change! We want it now!” brought her to tears. From what I’ve heard, there are stories like that from all caucus states. How sad for the citizens of those states who had been proud participants in the process, now intimidated by bullies shipped in to disrupt.
Posted by: cappamore | May 27, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Wait JPT, how is the democratic primary any less over than the republican one?
Posted by: jozsef | May 27, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
What Bill Richardson previously said regarding HIS OWN position on being a superdelegate, has NOTHING to do with Hillary’s beliefs on the subject.
I’m talking about what Richardson previously said on more than one occasion, and that was that his view on being a superdelegate was that they should go with the will of their constituents, and that so would he.
As Governor of New Mexico, his state went to Hillary. I only felt that he should keep his word.
If Hillary feels a superdelegate should vote their conscience, she is entitled to that belief.
As a citizen of Governor Richardson’s state, and one who has supported his previous campaigns, I felt that he should have kept his word and gone the way of his constituents.
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
No one can declare this nominating process to be over but Hillary Clinton.
That’s why the calls for her to drop out have been so insistent.
It is not only presumptious to annoint Senator Obama the nominee, it is disingenuous.
If HRC and her supporters want her to go to the convention, nobody can stop her.
Posted by: josgirl | May 27, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
catleya,
Why are you fighting about the assassination thing again ?
Clinton has said sorry.. She was wrong ! Move on
It was a stupid thing to say can you name another candidate that has brought up assassination in an election ?
It was crazy and everyone really knows what she meant…
Move on
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
The Huffington Post and the National Enquirer are of the same value in regards to accuracy. Neither are studied in journalism school.
Posted by: Marion | May 27, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
bhrandon, I had always thought something was fishy about the Guam election event!
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
07001,
The PM of Australia the UK NZ all prefer Obama
The German Chancelor prefers Obama…
the French President prefers Obama..
So who cares ???????
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
To Kate–about Maria. I totally agree with Maria. Obama is not for all Americans. He has a agenda of divide and conquer. Just tell em anything so they will vote for me. I am the ONE.
Posted by: Mary | May 27, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
josgirl,
As soon as Obama gets another 49 delegates he will declare himself the winner and Hillary can keep running until the the nomination fight in 2012 for all everyone else will care !
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Mary,
“He has a agenda of divide and conquer. Just tell em anything so they will vote for me. I am the ONE.”
How so mary ?
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
This should help Obama in the GE..CASTRO PREFERS OBAMA………..
Republic of Cuba. Havana Year 11 Nro. 2502 Monday, May 26, 2008 Updated:4:00p.m.@917
~ 50 year of the Revolution ~
…………………………
Castro made clear that Obama is his preferred candidate: He’s “doubtless, from the social and human points of view, the most progressive candidate to the U.S. presidency.”………
“Were I to defend him, I would do his adversaries an enormous favor. I have therefore no reservations about criticizing him and about expressing my points of view on his words frankly,”
Fidel Castro Ruz……………
May 25, 2008……..10:35p.m………..
I guess that’s why there are Che’/Cuban flags hanging in Obama’s campaign offices.
Posted by: 07001 | May 27, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
But SandyB, the governor never gave his word…only stated his view at the time. One thing you don’t do in an election, especially when you are not a candidate, is give your word…this whole thing is one huge debate…and if you couldn’t change minds, what’s the point?
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Kate, he can get all the supers he wants.
He won’t be the nominee until the convention unless HRC quits.
Otherwise, why wouldn’t the supers have broken for him already?
If they could really end this for the good of the party, why didn’t they do it a long time ago?
Unless they think it really isn’t good for the party?
People have taken the fight to the convention with bigger margins than this.
Posted by: josgirl | May 27, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
” .. the committee meeting can completely change the game in terms of the primaries. ”
Imagine this; If they change the game and Hillary gets the nomination, Obamabots may decide the what is good for the goose is good for the gender: They will to play the in the Clintonite games. Some will not to go to the polls on Nov 4. Most will vote for McCain – just to deny Hillary and Monica’s Billy the pleasure. of course Hillary and Billy don’t think that will happen. But they have been repeatedly dead wrong in their doomed campaign.
—
“.. most of the people (in the Rules Committee of the Democratic Party) that voted for (punishing Florida and Michigan) were Clinton people, because there wasn’t such a thing as Obama people in the establishment then.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080522/ap_on_el_pr/clinton_the_outsider;_ylt=AuUrz9iVw0lrmD7pwO51aGsb.3QA
—
Posted by: emilyStevens | May 27, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
” .. the committee meeting can completely change the game in terms of the primaries. ”
Imagine this; If they change the game and Hillary gets the nomination, Obamabots may decide the what is good for the goose is good for the gender: They will to play the in the Clintonite games. Some will not to go to the polls on Nov 4. Most will vote for McCain – just to deny Hillary and Monica’s Billy the pleasure. of course Hillary and Billy don’t think that will happen. But they have been repeatedly dead wrong in their doomed campaign.
—
“.. most of the people (in the Rules Committee of the Democratic Party) that voted for (punishing Florida and Michigan) were Clinton people, because there wasn’t such a thing as Obama people in the establishment then.”
—
Posted by: emilyStevens | May 27, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
josgirl,
Obama will be the nominee as soon as he get the 49 delegates he needs then all the suppers will get behind him..
Why havent the all put an end to this ?
Because they want to register as many voters as they can…
They have also given Hillary time to suck as much money from her supporter so she can retire her $20million plus debt..
We will she who is right on June 4 Ill meet you back here deal ?
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
He has wasted enough of his time with that silly woman.
Onto the GE!!!
I dont blame him and I fully support him..as do MANY others!
Obama/Webb 09
Posted by: PaigeInPhilly | May 27, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
How so?
Regarding Reverend Wright:
“I cannot disown him any more than I can disown my WHITE grandmother (and why does he feel the need to qualify his grandmother as being WHITE anyway??? and how does his grandmother WHO HELPED RAISE HIM, get lumped in the same category with his pastor anyway???)”
Fast forward two or three weeks:
“Oh, wait, he’s gone too far this time…now I can disown him….”
Reverend Wright was no less the same person than he ever was in April than he was in March, but NOW he’s an inconvenience and a political liability.
Kind of makes you wonder how much longer Grandma (with her uneasiness around strange AA men) has left in the beams of his two-faced ray of sunshine…………..
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
Oops..
Obama/Webb 08
yawn, im sleepie =0)
Posted by: PaigeInPhilly | May 27, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
cappamore,
I love the end bit of your post! LOL
Obama leads Clinton 33 primaries to 18
Obama has 1974 with 314.5 super Ds
Hillary has 1782 with 282.5 super Ds
Without super delegates:
Obama has 1660 delegates
Clinton has 1460 delegates.
Obama leads the popular vote even with FL
WHICH PART OF THAT DONT YOU GET ?
OBAMA NEEDS ONLY 49 delegates of any kind and he is the nominee !
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am
josgirl, my thought is the superdelegates have not broken for Obama yet–at least not in their droves, like you would expect–because they are only being respectful to Hillary, waiting for her to find a respectful exit, seeing how hard and daringly she has fought to leave a mark in our political history. I hope she takes the cue.
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
Really, TK???
Is that how it works???
Then if all superdelegates are allowed to change their minds at any time, and if some other problem arises in the next couple of weeks with Saint Obama, or if by some miracle they all come to their senses, then that means the 300+ Super D’s who have come out for Obama can go to the convention floor in August and say they are now for Hillary, even though he has won the majority of pledged delegates????
Wow, let’s see how that one flies……
Posted by: SandyB | May 27, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
josgirl,
Obama will be the nominee as soon as he get the 49 delegates he needs then all the suppers will get behind him..
Why havent the all put an end to this ?
Because they want to register as many voters as they can…
They have also given Hillary time to suck as much money from her supporter so she can retire her $20million plus debt..
We will she who is right on June 4 Ill meet you back here deal ?
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am
SandyB, ofcourse everyone reserves the right to change one’s mind; but, the pledged delegates less so, otherwise, why do we hold elections? I agree that your senario is totally possible, but also very very unlikely.
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am
SandyB, it’s only a snub that chooses his friends…Obama is too much of a gentleman to throw the reverend under the bus…what happened to him, the reverend did that to himself…all by his own self.
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am
To all Hillary supporters, a message from your leader!
“I’m going to work my heart out for whoever our nominee is. Obviously, I’m still hoping to be that nominee, but I’m going to do everything I can to make sure that anyone who supported me … understands what a grave error it would be not to vote for Sen. Obama.”
Clinton was responding to a question from a CNN iReporter who asked why she thought so many of her supporters would choose McCain over Obama….
Obama 08!
Posted by: Davis | May 27, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am
The bottom line is that if he gets the nomination, the other half of the Democratic voters will either not vote or vote for McCain. Very simple.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 27, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am
Rules are rules
There are currently a total of 796 unpledged delegates (known as superdelegates) who are free to vote for any candidate at the convention.
-wikipedia
“Unpledged PLEOs” consisting of the following:
Democratic National Committee members.
Democratic Members of Congress (U.S. Senators and Representatives, except those who are to be Pledged PLEOs).
Democratic Governors, except those who are already members of the Democratic National Committee and, therefore, are delegates re: a.) above.
Distinguished Party Leaders (current and former U.S. Presidents and Vice-Presidents, former Democratic Leaders of the U.S. Senate and U.S, House- including former Democratic Speakers of the House and former chairmen of the Democratic National Committee. and
These “Unpledged” delegates go to the Convention officially “Unpledged” (that is, not committed- ahead of time- to vote for any particular presidential contender), though it is well known that many- if not most- of these may very well be privately supporting a presidential contender.
-the green papers
Posted by: josgirl | May 27, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am
Even Hillary’s people think she’s lying, when she tells them it would be a mistake to vote McCain. When you cannot even believe your own candidate…voting out of spite only tells how bigoted your views are. I’m just wondering, what on God’s green Earth could the man have done to warrant your wrath, that you are willing to sell your soul, and us with it, to the devil?
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am
Folks need to educate themselves how parties work. Everone on any democrat ticket for office WANTED to be on the democrat ticket.
Any candidate that does not like the way the party elects its nominee or doesnt like its rules are all free to go play some other game.
The two parties exist because the candidates need them.. they dont need the candidates. For some reason folks think that the nomination process is democratic in nature when its NOT in either party. You have to understand that the Party is the Party and not the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.
Everyone keeps wanting to make this issue about VOTES COUNTING well it doesnt matter about VOTES. Simply put VOTES are no more than an indicator to the party who voters prefer. A vote in a primary is ANYTHING BUT an election. The candidates all know this but they try to spin things to upset the electoriate to favor them when they start indicating popular vote means anything.
Republicans have a ridiculous winner take all in most states for delegates again that is ANYTHING BUT democratic.
example.. 5 people on republican ticket.. 4 get 19% and the 5th gets 24% the state has 200 delegates.. the first 4 candidates get 0 delegates and the 5th candidate gets 200 delegates. that means that 76% of the Republicans that voted didnt get a thing for their vote. And we say the Democrats dont count everyones vote??
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am
Maria,
This is the problem you don’t seem to understand.
If Bill and Hillary had stayed on the positive, complimenting one another’s positive, build up the Democrat’s brand, who knows what the result will be. I was crazy about Bill initially, and I thought he was a great president. If Hillary doesn’t know what she is doing, at least he was there, and he was successful. The default and safe choice was Hillary /w Bill. Bill initially did that, complimented every candidate, and that’s how he should maintain himself. But when it gets to the primary, he went off course along w/ Hillary.
As they try to make Obama look bad, they make themselves look bad to us … just as you make yourself look bad as you attack Obama. You probably have the same intention as Bill/Hillary did – make Obama look bad. It doesn’t work. The Republicans will suffer the same fate if they haven’t learn from the failures of the Clintons.
Yes, it might be presumptuous for Obama to campaign as if he is in the general election, but because Hillary has dragged this out long, he doesn’t have that much time left for the general election. Because he is not as well known as the Clintons, the more time he spent time w/ them, the better. On another level, perhaps he knows he already win in the Democratic contest, and he no longer want to compete w/ her, but rather reserve his energy/attacks to go after McCain. Although the outcome is not known yet, perhaps he understand human nature enough to know that if he wins the most states, the most votes, the most delegates, the Party will not risk going against the voters, and on top of that, it’s his campaign that can raise the money and bring out the people, it’s the only logical choice that they can go to.
He also demonstrates himself to be more reasonable to deal w/ than Hillary and Bill. The superdelegates are more likely to want to work w/ him than w/ Hillary. One cannot make the argument that she is somehow discriminated, becase her initial national poll was highly favored. If Obama wins, it’s because he wins the hearts and minds of the American people once they get to know him.
Posted by: Trang | May 27, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am
Obama is so arrogant that it defies belief – and this from a junior senator with little experience! I’d like to see him pull this trick in the general election acting like he is President before the voters decide. Mark my words, his arrogance will be his undoing.
And he’ll never win in Novemeber – even the dogs in the street know it. Hopefully the DNC will come to their senses before August….
Posted by: Mark | May 27, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am
josgirl, my view is that, officially you are “unpledged”, but when you openly endorse a candidate, you better have a good reason handy when you go to the convention and aim to betray that candidate’s trust…such an act could cost you your career as a politician…it is called “not keeping your word”.
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am
Mark
Hillary Clinton is the junior Seanator from NY
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am
BBC just reported Jimmy Carter as accusing Israel of “one of the greatest human rights crimes on earth”.
In a related note, as reported in the L.A. Times and the N.Y. Times, Fidel Castro has endorsed Mr. Obama, calling Mr. Obama the most progressive of the three candidates remaining,
Posted by: Matthew | May 27, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am
Fidel Castro endorsed somebody. I wonder who Charles Manson or David Duke or some wino in a ditch is endorsing or heck maybe LASSIE?
The media is definately DESPERATE to find something to talk about politically.
WAIT>> lets put all three candidates on a different mattress and see which one snores the loudest.. that would be some great political news. Or give them a bad breath test early in the morning.. that another great informative story for voters to decide on.
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am
Mathew
Nice try with your typical undocumented republican spin.
Too bad I was still here to show how stupid that really is.
Let me see if i get it right.
I should not vote for obama because fidel castro endorsed him. and i definately shouldnt vote democrat since Jimmy Carter is being accused of something by some newspaper in a country where they worship the queen.
I suggest you find a cuban blog and a UK blog and go talk politics with those folks because your over your head here.
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am
Going ahead of the outcome reminds me of the newspaper declaring Dewey winner over Truman in the ’40′s.
Posted by: virginia | May 27, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am
to use the football example the Clinton camp uses which personally i like let me say this
Im the coach and its late in the 4th quarter the score is 70 to 0 my favor. I think its safe to pull all my starting players and start working on my game plan for next week with all my starting players and assistant coaches.
god i love football! and katherine that is quite the comment you made about natural endowment(wonder if you would like to explain that further and if that is something that voters should fear) and by the way there are more than 49 states and EVERY STATE including the Distric of Columbia has winner take all electorial college vote. to find out the number of states in the united states you have to count the stars on something besides a confederate flag. Your spunky enough to qualify as one of my ex wives i must admit!
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am
Matthew, that’s rather good news…maybe, there is still hope for us in the world yet!
Posted by: TK | May 27, 2008, 6:07 am 6:07 am
My extended family of 19 white middle class bitter small town disenfranchized Floridian Democrtas are switching from HRC to JM. BO does not share our values, has disenfranchized and dissed us. Florida and Ohio will boot BO and his elitist sexist Democratic party out. The condescending and arrogant way that BO has treated a remarkable woman colleague is an eye opened. ” You are likable enough Hillary” to ignoring her and moving away on the Senate floor and in your arrogance ignoring her and pretending it is over reveals a lot about the person you are are, not to mention the 20 years of infamy wiht your spiritual advisor friend Wright. I guess that you changed Wright from mentor/uncle /friend.soritual advisor to never all of the above means nothing is quite remarkable as your brain washed supporters would testify. Despite their ignorance it is the likes of me, our friends, uncles, mentors and spiritual advisors in FL and OH who will decide on our next president. You will never be in our plans. I am so disgusted with the way the elitist party and their sexist attitude that my family is seriously considering switching our registeration to Republican though our most hated name is Bush. Bush maybe a stupid idiot and the biggest mistake that America ever made, but he is not sexist or elitist.
Posted by: Warren5678 | May 27, 2008, 6:12 am 6:12 am
What the BBC reported:
Jimmy Carter
He also described Israeli treatment of Palestinians as “one of the greatest human rights crimes on earth”.
Former Israeli military intelligence chief Aharon Zeevi-Farkash told Reuters news agency he considered Mr Carter’s comments “irresponsible”.
However, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert included Israel among a list of nuclear states in comments in December 2006, a week after US Defence Secretary Robert Gates used a similar form of words during a Senate hearing.
During the press briefing, Mr Carter expressed his support for Israel as a country, but criticised its domestic and foreign policy.
“One of the greatest human rights crimes on earth is the starvation and imprisonment of 1.6m Palestinians,” he said.
The former US president cited statistics which he said showed the nutritional intake of some Palestinian children was below that of children in Sub-Saharan Africa, as well as saying the European position on Israel could be best described as “supine”.
Mr Carter, awarded a Nobel Peace Prize in 2002, brokered the 1979 Egypt-Israel peace treaty, the first between Israel and an Arab state.
As for Fidel Castro in case you didnt know Matthew this is America who but you gives a damn who Fidel endorses ?
Fidel said of the three Obama seems more progressive “SHOCKING”
Its like asking me whats faster a car a push bike or a jet ?
Of course Obama is more progresive he is looking to the future he is actualy going to use our state department for a change It will actually be doing some dipomacy not just to gain aproval for wars!
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am
warren WOW nice comment.
Bush isnt an idiot. He is just a typical Republican. You should be ashamed of yourself to talk about him that way.
oh one other little thing.. I can stand a BUSH 3rd term just fine! I invested in Royal Dutch Shell stock 25 years ago. Everytime I see the price at the pump go up my income goes up! And fantastic news.. they are predicting $15.00 a gallon gas in two years. I LOVE IT! I am also own 70 acres of property which has lignite coal less than 10 feet from the surface. Its easy street for me. No capital gains taxes benefits me and at the same time having pride in my America.. either way its a win win for me.
Hope you made some good investments too.
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
thank you joe, i appreciate the fact your the first one to pay me a compiment and i am glad you like my humor.
may i suggest you go back and read what i said instead of copy and pasting it.
i am giving you credit that not only can you read but you can comprehend what you read.
your prob with my comment seems to be that you comprehended incorrectly that i wrote you were basicly stupid if you supported a candidate. I didnt say that. I said that folks were showing and proving their stupidity when they just come here and make lame taking point statements and statements with no factual merrit and i accused supporters of all candidates in both parties.
But joe all i can tell ya buddy is like my moma said “If the Shoe FITS WEAR IT”
Take the time to read each and every comment i have made and you will PLAINLY see i have not shown a preference to EITHER candidate but just so you know i am a Democrat and i will vote democrat no matter who the candidate is. I vote my kids pocket book and the future. I have made my own financial security.
but to make this totally about politics and for ANY CANDIDATE you want to say something bad about i can counter that with an almost exact example for the other two candidates. Name your own poison. Thats why i feel we should debate issues.
or i could just say
MC CAIN IS THE BEST
OBAMA IS THE BEST
HILLARY IS THE BEST
smile worse times are on their way no matter who you vote for unless you have made some fantastic investments.
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am
It’s useful to win states, but states don’t vote — delegates do,” said Harold Ickes, who is heading up the delegate operation for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton.
“This is very much a race for delegates at this point,” said Ickes, a longtime Clinton insider and aide to President Bill Clinton.
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am
They actually declared Bill Clinton the nominee in April of 1992 (not June). He had an insurmountable lead over Jerry Brown in April. It was June when he actually got the number of delgates needed.
Hillary said, in her recent statement about Bobby Kennedy, it was JUNE when her husband WON the nomination. Ok. We’ll use her measure – the number of DELEGATES needed. That’s not the convention. That’s JUNE.
So why do her supporters keep saying the nominee is not declared until the convention? Even Hillary says it occurs when the number of delegates needed is reached. Obama needs only 49.
Get over it – she will not be the nominee.
Posted by: In her own words | May 27, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am
“I believe Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina play a unique and special role in the nominating process, Florida and Michigans votes won’t count”-Hillary Clinton 10-1-07
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am
EddienTexas wrote:
“your prob with my comment seems to be that you comprehended incorrectly that i wrote you were basicly stupid if you supported a candidate. I didnt say that.”
joeS wrote:
“So basically having an opinion about who a person believes will win(2.1) the campaign automatically qualifies a person as being an idiot(2.2) in your book”
EddienTexas wrote:
“I find it amusing when supporters of any candidate in any party predict defeat or victory for any candidate.(2.1)
For you ignorant uneducated people of all candidates I say this(2.2)”
You make the inference that people who predict victory or defeat are ignorant and uneducated, you can support somebody regardless of whether you believe they will win or lose. Therefore I was not making a reference to support but to those who you (“believes will win”). You did not comprehend me. I do appreciate that you attempt to be balanced in your debate but to suggest “we make this totally about politics” when you say things like “so you come here and just bad mouth political candidates to have someone to blame for your own personal failures as a human being.” Seems a little rich!
“may i suggest you go back and read what i said instead of copy and pasting it.” You can suggest whatever you wish but the use of quotes is a “serviceable replacement for whit”.
Posted by: joeS | May 27, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am
If Clinton is ‘given’ delegates according to the Michigan votes and Obama is given the undecided in Michigan and that all delegates are awarded (probably the worst case for Obama), Clinton stil needs more than 75% of the superdelegates. And a bunch of those, like Jimmy Carter, just haven’t mae it official so that in fact, she needs about 90% of the truly undeclared superdelegates.
Therefore, waiting for Florida and Michigan, is just buying Hillary time because in terms of the delegate race, it is over.
Here’s some testimony that attests to that position:
January 9, 2008:
WOLFSON: I guess one other thing I’d add is that, as you know, this is a race for delegates. And we currently enjoy a lead in delegates, thanks to the great — some of the great super delegates that we have on this call and around the country.
MCAULIFFE: … I’ve said from day one, and this is the point I tried to make yesterday on television when everybody was asking me questions about after Iowa and New Hampshire what happens, I’ve always viewed it sort of as a 27-state contest. But, listen, I always said we’re going to win some, we’re going to lose some. And at the end of the day it’s getting a basket of delegates.
January 25, 2008:
WOLFSON: Well, you know, as you know, all of the polls have Senator Obama ahead. I think he has run a strong campaign in South Carolina. He began there ahead; he remains ahead. And we have said since Iowa that this is a race for delegates. It’s a race that we are ahead in. We have more delegates than Senator Obama.
February 6, 2008:
CECIL: Well, our goal at the end of last night was to be ahead in super delegates and overall delegates. And, in fact, this morning, Hillary Clinton leads Barack Obama in delegates to the Democratic National Convention.
…WOLFSON: We think that we are in the poll position because we have a lead, overall, in delegates. We think it is going to be very difficult for Senator Obama to make up that lead because of the way in which the party allocates its delegates proportionately. So we feel very good about that. But this is going to be a neck-and-neck contest for the foreseeable future. Senator Obama does enjoy some advantages in the contests in the rest of February, but not in a way that should permit him to overcome our lead in delegates.
WOLFSON: And overall, we have a significant lead among delegates, overall, which, obviously, at the end of the day is what is going to positively determine which Democrat is our party’s nominee.
Posted by: CWatson | May 27, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am
is there any question?
A R R O G A N T
I’ll never vote for Obama.
Posted by: Jackie,nc | May 27, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
You left out the other Clinton Theory about RFK… i know you are thinking.. the sky is falling theories…
Lawrence
Posted by: Lawrence | May 27, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Is it just me or are you not paying attention. Obama only needs 48 or so delegates period…get a clue guys.. he will gain that before or on June 4th.
HANG IT UP CLINTON SUPPORTERS, MAYBE IN 2016….
Posted by: Lawrence | May 27, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
i am a lifelong african american dem.
i will not vote for obama.
i can live with a president mccain.
obama will not have won this fair and square.
sen. clinton had the deck stacked against her by the dnc and the media.
so they need to have a message sent to them.
and lose in the fall.
he will not win.
he is underqualfied.
it seem all the dnc with the help of the msm wanted was to beat sen. clinton
i can live with president mccain.
i will not vote for obama.
i do not see why the obama camp wants sen. clinton or bill to campaign for him.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Obama will be the 44th POTUS
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
kate,
not that it is any of your business,
i am black for 53 years.
and just so you know, i only list my ethnicity just to let people know, not all black people are voting blindly for obama or anyone else for that matter.
some of us have paid attention to the issues and how this process has played out.
i have never voted rep. in my life.
until this year.
as i say i can live with fair and square.
obama will win the dem. nomination based on everything except his qualifications.
and you can call mccain
mcbush, mcnutt , mcwar and any other little names you can creatively think up.
just so you know come nov. 4th he will have president in front of it.
black woman who will not vote for obama in nov.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
sen clinton has worked her whole life trying to make a difference in other people lives. no matter what you say
her record of good works stands.
when the time came-she and rangel and some others decided maybe it is time to run for the wh. and she put a team together to explore if that was viable.
obama on the other hand has a short political resume’ still people are saying we don’t know him
obama had people come to him and say we want to make you president.
there is a difference here.
obama is underqualfied to be POTUS
and he will not win in nov.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
for some reason i cant see my own comments anymore
But i have NO DOUBT whatsoever THAT WHOEVER the DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE is will the general election.
I do find it odd that some people feel the need to declare if they are black or white when they comment here.
since i said that i will quailify my race IM LILLY WHITE.. FAIRLY EDUCATED.. Finacially LUCKY but appear to most who know me as a working class guy.. i just dont have to ever go to work. I can afford to be a political junky and am a Texas democrat state delegate for one of the two remaining Presidental candidates. I have friends and political ties to people of several races and to my knowledge they dont refer to me as Eddie the white guy.
There is a hidden point about people who just HAVE to put a race on themselves or those they refer to.
hopefully i have made that point clear in a politically correct way.
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
eddientex
there is nothing hidden about my telling i am black
when people see me i don’t have to say
black.
as i said i list my color just to let people know not all blacks are voting for obama.
because i feel the black people who are
are doing it blindly-as was bore out in your state.
exit polls asking people who they voted for, when said obama asked why,
didn’t know just for change.
once again no hidden meaning from me
so if you think there is a hidden meaning tell me what it is and i will tell you if you are correct on my part.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
EddienTexas,
the people that declare their skin color here normaly do it while or ater making some racially insensitive or offence remark…
Other say it in responce to dumb remarks to directly challange those remarks..
But im with your point this election isnt about race its about the future!
Obama 08 12 : )
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
CWatson: If Obama is the nominee he is a loser in November. He cannot and will not win the battleground states and her voters will shift to McCain. However, if Hillary is smart she would declare herself an independent and that would take thousands of votes away from him. I would do that to split the democrats because of the DNC and Dean. McCain would win and even being a democrat I don’t care.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 27, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
ninety percent of black people voting for obama is about race.
and kate,
unless you have changed your name on here.
i have just seen you listed here over the past few days.
i comment here always.
have not seen your name or eddientexas
before so don’t talk about why most people who comment on here do it.
you don’tknow.
here is a future note for you
obama will not win the ge in nov.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Obama is being pushed on Democrats by the media and the DNC. However, a growing anti-Obama movement is forming with a number of different groups. You can stream Steve Corbett’s “Operation Turndown Obama” weekdays from 3-7 online at:
It’s an interesting show with callers from all over the U.S.
Posted by: katherine | May 27, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Benjamin: Your are so wrong. He would definately lose if she declares herself an independent and puts her name on the ballot or if all her voters write her in. That would be the best news for this country to see this arrogant candidate lose the election to McCain. And he would deserve it. Any one who votes for a candidate that belonged to a racist church for 20 years with a white hating pastor is racial themselves and don’t care about this country. All they are thinking about is Obama being president. I am a democrat but if she doesn’t win the nomination I will write her in and I hope her voters do the same.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 27, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
let me put it this way.. I dont care if a single woman votes for Hillary if she is my candidate i will vote for her.. I dont care if one single black person votes for Obama but if he is my candidate i will vote for him.
To be politically incorrect but straigt to the point.
IM NOT BLACK AND IM NOT FEMALE and im sick and tired of people like you making that an issue or even bringing it up!
Why cant people just be Americans! Honestly people like you dont belong in the democratic party in my opinion and i dont care if you vote Obama or Clinton or McCain or dont vote.
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
I find it amazing how Obama is responsible for all of Hilly mistakes.What do you not understand about the little word LOST????????
Posted by: older person | May 27, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Popular vote as of May 27, 2008
These figures INCLUDE Florida and Michigan, as they were fairly and legitimately earned by Senator Hillary Clinton, and have been validated by the respective Secretary’s of State.
Clinton 17,426,809
Obama 17,262,155
Total Diff. 164,654 (Clinton)
Pct. Diff. +0.45% (Clinton)
Above figures from RealClearPolitics.com
So, why SHOULD Hillary quit NOW?
Who do you think will be leading when the dust settles?
Hint – See below:
Combined population of Montana and South Dakota = 1,752,039
Population of Puerto Rico = 8,086,459
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 27, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
yes, katherine
i am aware of this group there are several others all very impressive
since it is out side of the msm.
and still growing.
the dems. will have a lot of suprises come june 4th.
must go kate and eddientex,
will be back in two hours.
to read your comments.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Which Democratic candidate is more electable?
Consider this:
This is how the Electoral College stands as of May 27, 2008, showing strengths of Clinton vs. Obama, based on their results. For those who have not understood, this is not a head-to-head matchup, but rather a side-by-side comparison.
This assumes a winner-take-all primary/caucus vote takes all Electoral votes for each state. The totals immediately below are WITHOUT any consideration of the states of Florida and Michigan.
Clinton 264
Obama 224
But with Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 308
Obama 224
With just Florida added, which was won by Clinton, fairly and squarely, the Electoral College Vote is:
Clinton 291 (includes Kentucky)
Obama 224 (includes Oregon)
Assuming the following victories, based on current polls, with Clinton winning NOTHING ELSE, and Obama winning South Dakota, and Montana, the totals would then be, still without Florida and Michigan:
Clinton 264 (includes Kentucky)
Obama 230 (includes Oregon, Montana, and South Dakota)
On June 4, 2008, with Florida, Michigan and Kentucky for Clinton, and, being charitable, with Oregon, South Dakota and Montana for Obama:
Clinton 308
Obama 230
Please note that it takes 270 Electoral College votes to win the General Election.
Whether or not the vote turns out as indicated, I firmly believe the above analysis more than amply demonstrates which of the Democratic candidates is in a better position to be the stronger candidate in the General Election.
P.S. – One last thought about this Electoral College Vote analysis; in it I gave Senator Obama full credit for the state caucuses he won. However, it should be noted that there are not any caucuses to be won in the Big Leagues during the General Election. There are only PRIMARIES, WINNER-TAKE-ALL.
And I am sure the “Super Delegates” are aware of that.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 27, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Things are NOT as they are made to appear.
For all the talk about “Super Delegates”, there is nothing “Super” about them. Just as everyone of us, they have one vote each. Their endorsement is just that, an endorsement. It is not a vote. They are not supposed to come into play unless there is a deadlocked convention, and in that case, they are expected to exercise their BEST JUDGMENT to cast their votes for that candidate they, in view of their extensive experience and political wisdom, think would be able to WIN the General Election. They are not supposed to be endorsing this or that candidate, BEFORE THEY VOTE AT THE CONVENTION. To do otherwise is to be false to the trust and responsibility that has been placed in and on them.
It would be better at this point if all the bickering supporters of each candidate looked at the number of ACTUAL PLEDGED DELEGATES allocated to their candidate on the basis of primaries and caucuses won. Those figures, as of May 27, 2008 (NY Times web site), for those who truly follow politics are:
Obama 1,485
Clinton 1,421
Diff. +64 (Obama)
Of the “surveyed” “Super Delegates”, of which there are approx. 795, there are at least 205.5 who have not “endorsed” any candidate, which is as it was intended to be. Again, an “endorsement” does not necessarily translate into a convention vote, since in theory “Super Delegates” are supposed to represent the wisdom of the party and are expected to be above the fray. Those who have endorsed, really should be stripped of their position and replaced by those who will act as intended. However, that is the responsibility of the DNC, which so far, has proven inadequate to discipline its own members.
The bottom line, “Super Delegate” endorsements should not be counted by candidates claiming that such an “endorsement” makes this person into a PLEDGED DELEGATE, for that is NOT THE CASE, and to think otherwise is to delude oneself and one’s followers. It is also wrong for the media to even report what “Super Delegates” are doing now, as they do not even come into play unless and until there is a DEADLOCKED CONVENTION.
However, there is nothing to prevent partisans from ‘counting chickens before they hatch”, nor is there anything to prevent the media from playing games with gullible people to increase interest in these silly stories.
As Yogi Berra once said, “It ain’t over, ’til it’s over”. And this fight is a long way from over.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 27, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Mariann Pepitone
Great republican spin..
lets play dirty wife politics
CINDY MCCAIN DRUG ADDICT
CINDY MCCAIN THIEF
CINDY MCCAIN FORGER
CINDY MCCAIN RICH AND STEALS FROM A CHARITY
dont chunk rocks when your standin in a glass house republican female spinster!!
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
This new found love for visiting battleground states is another example of Obama arrogance.One million plus voters are yet to cast their votes this weekend and next week.But then,when did counting all votes ever matter to him.It is all about using fuzzy math and becoming the nominee and have a nice convention SPEECH.
Posted by: vic | May 27, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
2/11/2008
Obama and Clinton Campaigns Agree that Superdelegates Should Vote for Who They Think Would be the Strongest Candidate for the Party
Top Obama Strategist Axelrod on Superdelegates
From this morning on NBC:
LAUER: Let me ask you about superdelegates. A lot of discussion about the role they’re going to play in all this by the time it’s over and the debate being whether they should vote out of loyalty to a candidate, particularly if they’re elected officials, or whether they should vote the way their state or district votes.
So, when it comes to Senators John Kerry and Senator Ted Kennedy, should they vote for had Barack Obama because they’ve endorsed him or should they vote for Hillary Clinton because the state of Massachusetts voted for Hillary Clinton?
AXELROD: I think that the role of the superdelegate is to act as, sort of, a party elder. These are elected officials from across the country and they’re supposed to exercise their judgment as to what would be best for the party. And as they look at this, they need to decide who would be the strongest candidate for the party…
LAUER: David, you’re not answering. Should those two senators vote for Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton?
AXELROD: I think they and all the superdelegates should vote according to what they think is best for the party and the country. And I think that we need the strongest possible candidate against John McCain…
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 27, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Mariann Pepitone
incorrect facts but no prob
John McCain not quite the big tortured war hero we hear about.
Fact – John McCain didnt receive any promotions as a prisioner of war.(reason is he violated the code of conduct for a US POW)
Fact – John McCain conduct at the naval accademy was so poor he would have been thrown out had his father not been a high ranking well connected Admiral
Fact – John McCain cheated on his former wife by having an affair with the now CINDY MCCAIN
Fact – All the pow’s held at the same North Vietnamese POW camp stated they were never tortured by their captors nor did they believe John McCain was.
Fact – John McCain was considered for courtmartial do this his actions as a POW but once again his admiral daddy helped him out.
Fact – John McCain lived a very upscale youth(admirals are far from poor) can we say elitist?
ok fire back and i got plenty more and i got them all from the Bush 2000 election research.. GEORGE W BUSH did do one thing right.. HE PEGGED MCCAIN FOR JUST EXACTLY WHAT HE IS!
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Obama is doing exactly what he has to do-moving forward.
Posted by: Jamie | May 27, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
obama ia a whiney wimp.
Posted by: trettine | May 27, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Mariann Pepitone wrote:
“If Hillary…”
No use..she’s broke and would have make up the deficit of $30 million before she could even think about printing a bumper sticker. She may be smart but a poor manager. Still, if she were the nom, she’d get my vote.
Posted by: debbie cho | May 27, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Barnie: When you say uneducated Hillary supporters are you talking about the college students that had to drop out because they couldn’t master the courses? And the college students that are in jobs making less than bus drivers do. You don’t read too well. Obama is a pauper’s millionaire, with about 2 million to his name compared to every other senator in the senate. And he got a lot of cash from Rezko for his dirty work as an attorney. Yes, he can lose the election to McCain if Hillary declares herself as an independent and take thousands of votes away from him. And I hope she is smart enough to do that instead of thinking about the democrats getting the white house back. This campaign has been a dirty game since Obama got into it and it is a dog eat dog campaign so she should go for the bone and let McCain win. Hillary was brought up as a republican in her younger days but became democrat when she married Bill Clinton. I am a democrat but I don’t like dirty pool and I believe Obama went behind the scenes to get votes from the superdelegates for favors. He learned how to wheel and deal when he was an attorney for crooked Rezko.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 27, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
After watching this race play out over the last few weeks, I have totally lost respect for the Clinton’s. They have injected racism, sexism, terrorism and murder into their campaign. They have ruined their political careers.
Posted by: WHITE FEMALE VOTER | May 27, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
no more drama vote obama
Honestly Im not sure if there are any real women democrats posting.
I think most of these “women democrats” are just Republicans playing the rush limbaugh game on most of the blogs.
Either that or they have absolutely no clue as to how party politics work.
As a true democrat if these women are real and that is how they really feel I would hope and pray that Hillary isnt anything like them.
But most likely they are just entry level political soundboards and most likely wont even vote.
The real democrats will get the job done along with fed up moderate republicans and independents. Its a long way to November and for once the democratic 527,s have in McCain a real easy target.
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Yes, I suggest all you Hillary supporters call the DNC and refuse to send money. If you have such powers over the DNC, why is your candidate $21 million in debt as of May 20th?.
Posted by: Jamie | May 27, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Just for the record:
1.) I am not a “spammer”. What I post, while in standard format, is updated every day, if necessary.
2.) I am not a paid blogger for anyone.
3.) If the truth hurts, that is not my problem.
4.) Someone working for ABC has developed a fondness for deleting some of my posts. Is this person perhaps a stealth Obama operative, or is in some other way biased?
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 27, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Mariann Pepitone
i support obama and hillary but geeeeeeeeesh to say obama has a lot of money.. hell hillary kitchen cost more than 2 million dollars.
if some republican is paying you your not earning your money!
As to obama being trounced by clinton.. yeah look at where he got trounced and look at the kind of voters that trounced him! Those voters wouldnt vote for a democrat because their snake handlin preachers would send them to hell.
Hillary is a good candidate but Obama ran off 12 straight victories in a row.
your argument is mute!
Posted by: EddienTexas | May 27, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Yes, I suggest all you Hillary supporters call the DNC and refuse to send money. If you have such powers over the DNC, why is your candidate $21 million in debt as of May 20th?.
Posted by: Jamie
==========================================
What does the DNC have do with Clinton’s campaign funding in the Primary? Absolutely NOTHING.
However, lack FUTURE contributions to the DNC are another matter entirely.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | May 27, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
TK: No one is telling you to sell your soul. If your candidate doesn’t win the nomination and you don’t like the other one then you either don’t vote, write you candidate in or vote republican. What do you think the battleground states are going to do that wouldn’t give Obama their votes. Don’t you think many of them are going to vote for McCain. They didn’t vote Obama because they don’t want him as president. And I don’t blame them. How stupid can he be to tell Castro he would not lift the embargo when he isn’t even the president yet. And to say he would sit down with Hamas and discuss terms. Do we want a world war III? If he is elected Hamas, Bin Laden and Al Qaeda will be dancing in the streets because they already know about him that’s why they want him elected. They know that he’s a no nothing and they will be planning their next attack. If that happens he will run and hide somewhere.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 27, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Javo, The DNC cant wait to have Obama as its nominee. He is the money machine!!!!
Posted by: Jamie | May 27, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Support the troops. Support Webb’s ver GI Bill!
Posted by: Old Soldier | May 27, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
George Stephanopolous is predicting that Hillary will betray and abandon all her loyal supporters and drop out of the race, and endorse Barack Obama, probably within the next ten days or so.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 27, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Barry does not matter how early you start, you are unelectable!
Time for you to find your favorite pew and do what ever with your REV WRIGHT!
Posted by: HP Boston | May 27, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Me says time is running out and if Obama gets saddled with the general as he hopes to be, he should start cutting into the fabric at this time because he definitely has a lot of work to do, more so than any other presidential candidate. There are many rumors to dispel, misconceptions and his own mistakes to repair so I say, get on with it.
Posted by: therookie | May 27, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
A few unpopular decisions by President Obama and the love affair and fanatical fans will quickly fade.
He won’t have Hillary or racist or his campaign to blame for his gaffes…
Obama’s weaknesses,inexperience, extreme left views will be exposed and America loses.
We have to vote Hillary or McCain to protect America.
Posted by: cindy in nc | May 27, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
this supporter of sen. clinton will be voting for mccain.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Democrats who are getting their feelings hurt by how Senator Obama is choosing to finish the primary campaign season should just vote for John McCain and get 8 more years of the Iraq War, the inasion of Iran and, for domestic policy, the reversal of Roe vs. Wade. That will show Senator Obama a thing or two.
Posted by: Bob malone | May 27, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
WHITE FEMALE VOTER | May 27, 2008 9:28:38 AM:
How about some facts to quantify your rant!
Posted by: EYES EXTREMELYWIDE OPEN | May 27, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
and it will show the dnc, the media, and obama supporters who voted for him before really knowing anything about him
obama is underqualfied to be president.
he should have tried to add to his political resume’ before running for president.
the dnc should have tried to be fair. they were not.
the media should have not taken sides they should have vetted obama early on
if they had the dems would have been going back to the wh.
if not with sen. clinton, biden or edwards.
black people voted blindly for obama for all the wrong reasons for voting for a president.
and now the country will suffer
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 27, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Old Soldier, the Graham-Burr-McCain GI Bill is a better bill.
Posted by: James Danley | May 27, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Obama is doing the right thing, let’s get the DNC juggernaut going, dispel RNC’s hogwash, and patch up Clinton’s slurs.
We’ve all seen how fast things have changed since Last November, by November ’08 it’ll be “Hilary who?”
It’s high time this country gets united, gets Bush/Cheney into the historical best seller list, and starts using the incredible amount of tax dollars we Americans give to the IRS for humanitarian aid and diplomacy instead of bombs.
Us babay boomers thought we’d done it right by getting Nixon gone and the US out of Vietnam. Looks like we were just priming the pump so the next generation could really step up to the plate.
Obama in ’08 and ’12.
Posted by: dennis | May 27, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Jack Tapper is showing his true worth, trying to elongate the democratic primary season. It makes for good copy.
This is why the DP has dragged on so long, is articles like this one that perpetuate the myth that Clinton can win. The MATH IS IT. Yes it is impossible… so why all the hand wringing and nay saying.
This thing has been over for some time now, it’s just that the Hillary will not admit it (hoping for the worst quite clearly) and that the media is playing along.
This has been damaging for the country, but it sells papers and makes for ‘interesting’ commentary. But in then end, it will be Obama, he has already won. So there is no need for him to contest these last primaries… get over it Jack.
Posted by: BubbiSmith | May 27, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
I think he has to manage a fine balancing act. On the one hand, he needs to go back to S.D., MT, and PR, and campaign like he wants to win these states. On the other hand, campaignig as if he were already in the GE, as he did over the weekend sends an important signal not only to the Supers, but also to McCain.
But it is a fine line.
Posted by: Suzanne | May 27, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
You’re kidding, right? Obama has won the majority of pledged delegates and is clearly the inevitable nominee while Hillary Clinton continues a disgraceful strategy of lying and cheating her way to a stolen nomination, which won’t happen. Everyone knows this except the Clintons and perhaps yourself. Everyone knows that the popular vote measure doesn’t matter and is wholly illegitimate and impossible to calculate fairly, except the Clintons and perhaps yourself. This silly, speculative post suggests that the Obama campaign knows nothing more than you about the internal polling of the final primaries and what will happen on May 31. For the record, I have no problem with Obama campaigning for the general election now, as he should. Not even the Clintons have complained about that, they’re too busy lying and cheating and, well you know the rest.
Posted by: DoctorJ | May 27, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Obama has to move on because McCain has moved on! The DEM party continues to hide its head in the sand an hope it all works out.
Hillary probably will win PuertoRico by 70-30 and loose MT and SD moderately….this is getting very predictable. But it won’t matter.
Posted by: Young Atheart | May 27, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
dennis writes, “it’s high time this country get united…”
I agree. United against Obama!
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 27, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Many women who are avowed Hillary Clinton supporters are declaring they won’t vote for Barack Obama in the fall. I get the anger and the disappointment. But to quote SNL’s Amy Poehler and Seth Meyers: Really? You’d rather vote for John McCain, a man who has a 25-year history of voting against a woman’s right to choose? A man who over the last eight years that NARAL has released a pro-choice scorecard has received a 0 percent rating? A man whose campaign website says he believes Roe v. Wade “must be overturned”? A man who has vowed that, as president, he will be “a loyal and unswerving friend of the right to life movement”? Really?
Posted by: Kate | May 27, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
HoosierSue | May 27, 2008 4:10:48 PM
;-)
Posted by: eyes open | May 27, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
If Obama was seriously campaigning to WIN the general election, you’d think he’d start mending some fences with all the HRC “sweeties” he’s royally ticked off!
Posted by: Amy | May 27, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Wow. All of this talk about Obama not having enough experience!
Hilary actually has less experience as an elected official.
Hillary – 2000-present as NY Sentor
Barack – 1996–2004 in Ill Senate
2004-present Il Senator
Sleeping with the president doesn’t count. There are a lot of women who could claim that same experience. lol
Posted by: Tired of Ignorance | May 27, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
YES WE CAN speak truth to power.
YES WE CAN stand in righteous indignation against the injustice we have felt from members of our own party.
YES WE CAN exercise our right to vote for whomever we feel will best serve the nation.
YES WE CAN refuse to support a party that has turned it’s back on it’s most loyal supporters.
YES WE CAN stand on principle, in large numbers, because there are more important things than politics.
YES WE CAN change our party affiliation.
YES WE CAN stand up against fear mongering from our former party(Roe v. Wade)
YES WE CAN recognize incompetence in our Democratic Congress and feel secure in knowing that they don’t get anything done anyway.
YES WE CAN say NO to change we don’t believe in.
YES WE CAN vote for McCain in Nov, and deny the presidency to a man we consider to be nothing more than a politically expedient, self serving, corrupt fraud.
YES WE CAN, and many of us will.
Posted by: rosietheriveter | May 28, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Tired of Ignorance….Obama has actually only worked in the Senate about 150 days…heard that on Fox news about a month ago. A three year Senator has been working more on his Presidential campaign, it seems.
Posted by: Debra | May 28, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
Arrogant? You bet. Let the people finish voting please. Then the MI and FL votes have to be worked out and then the SuperDems must vote. This is not a done deal. To act like it is, really is presumptious and disrespectful to the remaining voters and it’s disrespectful to the process. June 3rd is just a week away, the Obama camp could have waited until then at the very least.
Posted by: OceanCityGirl | May 28, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Obama is an idiot. Get Real. He has NO experience in Washington or foreign affairs, and will make blunders that will REALLY harm America. But if he is elected, it will be too late. And we all know he will mostly support a “particular” group of people.
Hillary knows what she is doing. She will be truly “READY ON DAY ONE”, and she was supported by 34 AMERICAN GENERALS to that effect, (see video). And she has spent her whole life helping children, the underprivileged, the underdog, and the elderly. She has a strong sense of justice.
It will truly be wrong if she is not elected. She is the best candidate I have seen in many, many years.
Posted by: GET REAL | May 28, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
It is SO tragic how the media has hurt Hillary OVER AND OVER again, how the late night show hosts ridicule her, not her policies, but her laugh, her facial expressions, stupid things that are WAY below the belt, from everyone, mostly men, who are really scared of a woman in a previously man’s position. That shows their insecurities and stupidities. But precious Obama has never been subject to such verbal torment by the media, probably because he is a man.
The men cannot accept that a woman is really that intelligent, qualified to be President, experienced, and that would make the best President we would have ever seen in a long, long time.
The two-faced treatment of Hillary in the press, and with Obama not facing the same treatment from everyone, has given him an unfair advantage. No one ever heard of him before this, he has no track record, and if he wins, he will have won unfairly, by stupid people.
GET REAL. GROW UP. VOTE FOR THE MOST QUALIFIED PERSON, WITH THE BEST HEAD ON THEIR SHOULDERS. WE NEED A GOOD PRESIDENT LIKE HILLARY!
Posted by: GET REAL | May 28, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am