By Nitya

May 1, 2008 12:29pm

Obama: Rivals Support of Gas Tax Holiday a ‘Gimmick’

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller Reports: Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., likened Senators John McCain, R-Ariz., and Hillary Clinton’s, D-N.Y., support of the gas tax holiday to the "Mission Accomplished" sign behind President Bush 5 years ago today, calling it nothing more than a political "gimmick" that pretends progress is being made.

Obama, who does not support the gas tax holiday, explained to seniors at a retirement home in Indiana that he believes savings would not translate into money in the pockets of drivers because gas companies would boost their prices.

"For us to pretend like we’re solving the problem by giving people 30 cents a day, for a grand total of $28, and that’s it. That’s our plan to deal with gas prices and energy?” Obama questioned of his two opponents, lumping them together and dubbing it the "McCain-Clinton" proposal.

Obama compared the plan to the now (in)famous "Mission Accomplished" banner which hung behind President Bush after he landed on a Navy jet on an aircraft carrier off the California coast and declared the end of major combat in Iraq, a moment that has come to symbolize the administration’s missteps and miscalculations with regard to the war.

"But that’s how Washington works," Obama making a parallel with his opponents’ support of the gas tax holiday, "People are more concerned about looking good for the cameras and for politics than they are at actually solving problems. You remember when George Bush five years ago put up a big sign in front of an aircraft carrier saying ‘Mission Accomplished in Iraq. I’m sure they thought that was good politics. Except five years later we’re still in this war in Iraq."

Obama said Clinton supports the plan because she thought it would poll well, and referenced a Washington Post article which quoted Clinton aides speaking of her support for the plan.

"You know what really burns me up is that we just read yesterday in the newspaper that Clinton’s own advisers admitted that this wouldn’t really work, this wasn’t really gonna help lower gas prices, but they said it was good politics, because they said ‘Obama was opposed to it – it might make him look bad.’ But that’s how Washington works."

Obama, who is hawking a more economic message in his campaign events leading up to the Indiana and North Carolina primary next week is using his dissension on the gas tax holiday as an example of his campaign theme against conventional Washington.

"Time we stop using gimmicks in Washington to make it look like we’re doing something," Obama concluded.

User Comments

One got to be proud of supporting HRC, after watching her interview with O’Reilley. On the other hand, Obama hides away, dishing a good debate for the voter of Indiana and NC. What is he afraid of? I guess if you have no substance, you’d better hide. Now, BO is even more afraid of debating, or taking even modestly direct questions.

Posted by: lazy to think | May 1, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

BO simply does not get it when it comes to “poor, bitter” voters who struggle with economic pressure. It is not just the gasoline taxes that you save, bonehead. It will help to reduce the costs of shipping food, groceries, clothing to your supermarkets and department stores. It save you flying, transportation, and it helps to build consumer confidence to turn the economy around.
When was the last the rich, “educated” elitist get it when small tax cuts can bring about large economic changes.
Talking about change, does BO really get it?

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 1, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

What is the harm if the consumers get a short term benefit. It is better than not getting anything. HRC has maintained that the long term policy would be dealt with separately but what was important was to give some break to the ordinary citizens for whom even $25-30 has a meaning. Obama’s opoosition only solidifies his image as an elitist.

Posted by: PS | May 1, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

The gas tax pandering thing is just silly, and I have to think even Clinton and McCain supporters know this. Can you guys point to one person not associated with a campaign who thinks its a good idea?
Anyway, we also know its nothing but campaign hot air – talk – as opposed to action.
And we know this because both are calling for it this summer, when the office they are seeking won’t be unoccupied until next January. And both are sitting senators, with staffs still staffing their Washington offices.
Has either office worked up a bill for this summer? No. Just campaign pandering talk.

Posted by: Paul | May 1, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Thank God Barack has some common sense. Taking the tax away accomplishes nothing. Gas prices are still high. taking the tax away will increase demand and therefore up the cost even more. Plus, that tax goes to repair highways. Clinton and Mccain are praying on the dumb people who do not know any better.

Posted by: marie | May 1, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Obama’s “press conferences” are always one way street. When was the last time that he allowed real, tough questions asked by someone who is either not an open or a closet supporter of his?
The last 21, minus the 21st, has been abundant with phrases like “me too”, “I agree”. Can you, Louis, name a single, original policy idea come out of Obama’s brain?

Posted by: lazy to think | May 1, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Lazt to think…..there are very little “original” ideas out there no matter who it comes from.

Posted by: marie | May 1, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

OK, assuming you get a full tank of gas every week, if $2 a week will make or break yoru budget you have more serious fish to fry. Gas has gone up that amount in the last two weeks and we have not even gotten to the normal summer increases on fuel. It will do nothing to reduce the cost of transportation and there would be no trickledown. gas prices are high because the demand is high, the supply is controlled by provate parties and the dollar is weak. None of that is affected by the gas tax holiday. however the lsot revenue will allow for road projects to be delayed and repairs and maintainence to be put off. where do you think the money is going to come from to pay for the tax that HRC wants but will ot have a hope of passing? Oil companies get millions in tax breaks and still arbitrarily raise prices. HRC knows this is going no where, but that it sounds good on the news. She learned the republican playbook well abotu campaigning on fear.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

At least she has a plan!!!!!!

Posted by: CD | May 1, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Hillary needs to stop with the debate crap. She just wants to show us more of why she should not be in office.
Common sense is what Obama is made of, he is a true leader. He thinks before he makes rash decisions.

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Now, we see a new low of dirty politics, negative campaign by Obama he himself, by equating his fellow Democrat, only because she is his opponent, to George W. Bush’s worst politics.
Can you get any lower than GWB, Mr. Obama?
Apparently, you can.

Posted by: bony | May 1, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Clinton is just about as bad as Bush bony. Same old…Same old.

Posted by: marie | May 1, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

I can see why you like the 21st debate so much, A former Bill Clinton staffer and a member of the media that strongly supported Bill Clinton were the moderators. The questions were inane and non-policy oriented. They devoted all of 5 minutes to fuel prices. Exactly what tough questions are you looking for? I’m concerened about the war, the economy, education, and health care.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

The problem is that the tax holiday takes money away from road and bridges… you know the bridges that are FALLING APART!!!!!!!! Literally FALLING APART people!!!!!!!!! We are going to take money away from keeping our roads and bridges safe for $28 per person. That doesn’t make any sense. Thank you Obama for telling us what we need to hear. Please get your facts right people. Hillary claims she is going to make up for the money by taxing the oil companies… of all people have been trying to do that forever and can’t get the bill passed… so where is the money going to come from???

Posted by: matt | May 1, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Louis – It takes about, I don’t know, 3000 miles, to ship the good fresh vegetables from California to Indiana. How many gallons of gas you are going to save? 24c x 3000 = $720 per load. Oh, right, you also need to come back. $1440, now. How many loads you can take per month? Let’s just say 10. You save $14,400 per month, simply by one trucker in transportation. This, even 50% is transformed into price reduction, your good citizens in Indiana would save $7,200, from one trucker.
How about that money “saved” is spent somewhere else? Does that help the economy? I guess you do not need to worry about this, and BO certainly does not need to care to get it.
You BO supporters do not have to bog down only with 1 tank of gasoline. It is not one tank of gasoline, it is the economy, stupid!

Posted by: lazy to think | May 1, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Louis – they’re looking for a 90 minute debate about Rev Wright, and other pressing national issues.
Let’s face it. Obama hasn’t really answered the charges about his kindergarten essays yet.
Silly you, worrying about wars and energy policy.

Posted by: Paul | May 1, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

lazy – Indiana isn’t 3,000 miles from California, unless perhaps Clinton campaign staffers are planning the route.

Posted by: Paul | May 1, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Paul – ok, 4000 miles.

Posted by: lazy to think | May 1, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Trivializing $28 is just another way that Obama has demonstrated that he is out of touch with many Americans. Does he know what the Federal minimum wage is? It takes almost 5 hours to make that much money.

Posted by: LOM | May 1, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Obama is dam if he does and dam if he doesn’t with you Hillary people. Give it up. Go study Hillary, if you have common sense you will come back and want Obama. Nothing she says makes sense or would pass through Congress, like her Health Care package she has been carrying around for 35 years. There is a reason it is not effective right now. Her own husband wouldn’t even look at.

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Becky — Why don’t you outilne for us what specifically doesn’t make sense? Trying to push universal health care 15 years ago shows that she was progressive then. She has learned a lot about what will and won’t work and has put forth a truly universal plan for health care. Women suffrage didn’t happen the first time around either.
What is it that makes Obama’s plan superior?

Posted by: LOM | May 1, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Hillary’s short fix solution for this is crazy, what’s going to happen when that tax break is over? she’s not thinking what will happen after that…

Posted by: Jack | May 1, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Why the bother? The nomination is over!

Posted by: Aston | May 1, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Lazy – right, 4,000 miles, if you don’t drive through any caucus states.

Posted by: Paul | May 1, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Tell a trucker that the tax holiday is a bad idea. Then, run like hell!

Posted by: Aston | May 1, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

so you think this is a serious proposal on Clinton and McCain’s part? For this summer?
Ask yourself why their senate offices aren’t working up the legislation, then, because the next president won’t be president until January.

Posted by: Paul | May 1, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

lazy- get a map – you sound like Mis Jr South Carolina! The point is that oil companies will raise their prices by the same amount that the tax takes off- it quickly adds more to their already bulging profits! I suppose you support the oil companies ridiculous billion dollar profits.

Posted by: jozy | May 1, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Throw the dog a bone and keep quiet for an hour, Hillary is not giving any solutions, just saying what you want to hear…

Posted by: Jack | May 1, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

If Hillary’s plan is such a good idea, then why has she (or McCain) not submitted legislation to the Senate to make it happend, oh that’s right, she would rather pander to us common folks rather than submit a stupid idea to congress… a plan? it is just a smoke screen.

Posted by: donald rar | May 1, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

jozy – I support taxing the hell out of the rich, educated elitists, and the oil companies whose profits were partially benefited by the Cheney bill that Obama supports.

Posted by: lazy to think | May 1, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Hillary’s got do better than 30 cents a day if she wants to buy my vote.
But apparently this is not the case for alotta people posting on da board.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 1, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

donald rar
Where, exactly, is Obama’s plan in the legislative flow?

Posted by: Aston | May 1, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

At least Hillary Clinton is bridging the gap between the Dems and Repubs. What is obama doing? He is running away hiding behind Caroline Kennedy that’s what he is doing. Obama is a coward and a coward is not what the USA needs as a president. obama cannot even fight his own battles, it takes a woman to put on the gloves for him. Sure vote obama – the first threat that he receives from a foreign nation, will make him run for the nearest bomb shelter, in hot pursuit by the Reverend Wright, who will just happen to have permanent residence in the White House. You obama supporters must be nuts.
I watched Hillary and O’Reilly last night and she did very well. She has guts and she can take anything that the Repubs throw at her. She will look you directly in the eye and answer you. Obama cannot look you directly in the eye – ever notice that? Obama is a LIAR and he doesn’t have the guts to go on O’Reilly because O’Reilly will ask obama questions that obama is afraid to answer. what a brazen piece of arrogance – running for the distinguished job of President of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The USA – something that his friend and mentor, Jeremiah Wright and obama’s white hating wife are so against. Sure vote for obama and get the Middle East cleaning out America.

Posted by: Lou | May 1, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Anyone want to discuss whether we should re-instate the national 55 mph limit?
I read an article that said most cars start losing gas mileage over 60 mph. Its different car by car – each has its own sweet spot. I tried it, for the last four tank fulls.
My Corolla was getting 32 mpg on average. I have about 12 miles each way on a highway while commuting. Instead of my usual 70, I’ve kept it 58 mph. I’ve averaged 35 mpg for the last four tanks. That’s close to 10 percent. I’ll keep watching, but so far, I’m a believer.

Posted by: Paul | May 1, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Obama is proposing to reduce the cost of driving by suspending purchases for the country’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Over the long term he would also tax windfall oil profits and cap carbon emissions to provide rebates for low-income Americans and money to invest in renewable-energy research.
No its not going to put $30 in your pocket but it is not going to take 300,000 jobs away from people who them. Plus take away from our roads..ect.
Did I not hear HIllary also say something to the effect that American people then can buy war bonds to fix the roads? If we can’t afford the gas how are we going to afford the war bonds??

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Hey isn’t this MISSION ACCOMPLISHED day times 5?
Today is one of the days a year when we look back on GWB’s decision, which was facilitated and enabled by Hillary, to invade Irak.
Wonder where the Gas Prices would be without this blunder?
Heckuva Job Bushie!
Heckuva Job Hillary!!!

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 1, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

A – The “bitter” middle class voters are always optimistic, and fighting for what they believe in, even it’s against odds.
If there is hope, they do not stop.
Hope? Does that sound strange to you, apparently a BO supporter?

Posted by: lazy to think | May 1, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Obama is just amazing. He wants to be president? Anyone can complian about some elses plan that easy .Just as normal the man has no pla of his own!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!! JUST ANOTHER JIMMY CARTER IN THE MAKING!!!

Posted by: Billof missouri | May 1, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

LOM: On CNN this weekend they had experts on about the Health Care Policies of all 3 candidates. To be honest, none of them will work. They said it should just be a flat rate we all pay in order for the US to have fair Universal Health Care plan that will work. Like your school taxes, or gas taxes, a flat rate tax that is taken from your check.

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

It will only save you $25-$30 over the entire summer. Plus it will increase demand causes the prices to go even higher in the end. We need a real fix to this problem not a temporary one. Obama 08

Posted by: Tiffany | May 1, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Unlike the gas tx holiday BO tried to pass in Illinois. Hypocrite!

Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 1, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

LOM: Oh sorry forgot to say, they said that if we keep the Insurance Companies in control it would not work.

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

I think Obama is missing the big picture as far as summer tax relief. A coworker of mine just today canceled her two week vacation to go out to California this summer citing too high of gas prices to pull a camper along. It’s those type of summer activities that the savings will make a difference. Also, I had seen where it would save about $30 a month for the average person, well times that by a family with two cars and that is $60 a month. May not seem like a lot, but I certainly remember the lean years my husband and I went through with young children. $60 would have and still can make a big difference. It certainly can help offset the higher prices of milk, eggs, meat and bread. Again, this is showing how out of touch Obama is when people say they need relief. People live paycheck to paycheck and every little bit helps.

Posted by: Julie | May 1, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

rockthebleachers: Yes, he did vote for and it did pass in Illinois. That is why he is so against it now. It did not work. It cause more problems. At least he admits his mistakes and does not try to blame others.

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Julie, really.. is that $30 back in your pocket worth 300,000 jobs to people who also need to feed their families.

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Really, Hillary wants to right the wrongs of NAFTA because it is not working but you say she can’t do that. Maybe she changed her stand too!
Voting on Tuesday! Hoosiers for Hillary!

Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 1, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Julie, Obama does see the big picture that’s why he thinks it’s a bad idea. This is just pandering by Hillary and McCain. Economists agree with Obama on this one. Besides we wouldn’t see a penney of it.

Posted by: lily | May 1, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

If this is a gimmick then what about the speech BO gave to disassociate himself from Rev Wright. That was purely for political reasons. Just when Rev questioned his posturing he got angry and threw the gimmick to the press. Why did he not disassociate himself when he heard the post 9/11 sermons. Only when it hit him personally did he move to distance himself. What an opportunist and calls himself a bridge builder. Rev Wright knew him better than any of his supporters and he could not handle the truth.

Posted by: PS | May 1, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

“jozy – I support taxing the hell out of the rich, educated elitists, and the oil companies whose profits were partially benefited by the Cheney bill that Obama supports.”
Does that include HRC and her husband?
On another note ,my vehicle gets about 50 mpg. I ride a motorcycle and will continue to do so. I suggest that if you are going to invest in one – take a riders class as it may help you from killing yourself.
The ” summer tax relief” is bogus, you people should learn to read and investigate what you are told, no wonder HRC is running for office. Americn people have turned into sheep! BAAAAA, BAAAAA

Posted by: jozy | May 1, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

I guess we don’t know at this point, Becky. We’ll have to ask the proprietors of tourism establishments how their seasons went at the end of the summer and how their summer employees have fared.

Posted by: Julie | May 1, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

A, that’s the thing. There is no assurance that the oil companies will pass it along to us.

Posted by: erin | May 1, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

I can see it now… McCain/Hillary 08.
The ultimate reach across the aisle, well its not that far considering how they have agreed on so many things in the past, including this gas tax fiasco. You people need to realize the gas situation and poverty aren’t going to be solved by this, or even offer any relief because the demand will increase and gas will keep rising. It is simple economics.

Posted by: Mark | May 1, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

A: If you cut the gas tax (for that weekend, they said it would amount to like 3 billion, I believe) it takes from the roads, bridges, ect. Like our bridges are falling down now, no money for the structures to be worked on, no money for the contractors who do the work. The specialist said it would be at a cost of about 300,000 jobs, plus bad roads and bridges. It is a set back for us not an advancement.

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Once again, Obama is such a hypocrite. As an Illinois senator, he supported bills that mirror the Clinton proposed Holiday gas tax. Furthermore, Hillary isn’t talking about this Holiday tax as a long-term solution. Rather, it’s a short-term measure used in conjunction with other initiatives to bolster gas affordability for struggling American families. She also supports the on-going and new development of alternative energy sources that will dramatically reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
@ Becky: As for health care, Hillary’s plan would redistribute the hidden tax that is already deducted from most health insurance plans. Therefore, a solid portion of subsidy would not come from your paycheck, but rather from lowering premiums and altering the utilization of existing deductions.

Posted by: Emily | May 1, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Yes this holiday gas tax is McCain’s idea. Hillary just jumped on the band wagon and hoped everyone would think it was her idea.

Posted by: ll | May 1, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Only Obama thinks that doing SOMETHING , even a token gesture is better than doing NOTHING.
Only Barack Obama can TWIST it around .
Its so simple. Its not much. Its not the great savoir. Its just simple and DOES save people money. Especially long haul truckers and other professonials. Its not like its the ONLY thing Clinton would do. Its something EXTRA that Obama wouldnt do.
But no. Obama takes his condescending high road like a good liberal elitist and TWISTS it around like doing very little is worse than doing nothing at all.
What a jerk.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 1, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Here is how you address the gas price crisis. Stop using so much damn oil. We’ve had the technology to produce a commercially viable electric car for over a decade. 90mph, 300 mile range, plug it in when you get home, 85% charge in an hour, full charge in 4 or less. Any size car you want from a two seater sports car to a full sized SUV.
This is not 5 years away, not 10 years away this is right now. Could and should be rolling off the assembly lines in less than 90 days.
Mandate Zero Emmissions.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

@ A:
Actually, I wasn’t referencing who proposed the Holiday tax first, I was merely pointing out that Hillary’s stance on rising gas prices is rooted in our need for short-term as well as long-term initiatives.

Posted by: Emily | May 1, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Tomdavie, do you know that hundreds of thousands of jobs nationwide would be lost because of this ludicrous idea.

Posted by: erin | May 1, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

tomdavie, sometimes doing nothing is better than doing something as incredibly stupid as spending money you don’t have, especially when it is not going to help.
I call Obama on this too, none of them have the guts to take on the Oil and Auto companies and mandate the end of the internal combustion engine.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

1 – gas tax holiday was good enough for Obama when he was Illinois state senator (voted for it, not just present). Is this just another example of how he changes his mind to suit political contingency?
2 – Every economic analysis I’ve read looks purely @ the value of the tax as per car or per family. What about the larger issue – ANY money I can save on gas, helps pay for groceries (which are also increasing in price), helps pay for mortgage (which is also increasing), and would make me feel better about a summer drive to the beach with the kids. Plus, no discussion about impact on trucking/transportation – if one olive could save Delta millions of dollars a year, why wouldn’t a few months of lower gas on an aggregated basis show greater benefit than is being recognized?

Posted by: UhNo | May 1, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

take the $65MM we spend daily on the strategic oil reserve, refurbish a couple of closed plants and put some of those towns back to work producing non-gasoline powered cars. These cars will be the new fuel tax credit, instead of a check. Trade in your old car for one of these. Never pay for gas, or oil changes ever again.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

@ UhNo: Excellent points.

Posted by: Emily | May 1, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Uhno, because gas prices will still go up over the summer and beyond.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

UhNo -
You are a perfect example of why this situation won’t resolve the gas situation. You save money at the pump over the summer so you buy groceries, which cost money in shipping gas etc to arrive at your local supermarket, which you will drive to. Then once you have all your groceries packed up in your SUV you will drive out to the beach with your kids and feel good because gas is cheaper, you saved money. All the while you are increasing the demand of gas, buying more of it because you feel good about it, and what happens when demand increases??? They will increase the price of gas. Supply/Demand. Google it or something, please.

Posted by: Mark | May 1, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Delta provided less for the same price. Now if you wanted to save in that fashion, use less gas. The holiday is more akin to a store stating that prices have been slashed by 10% after they just raised them by 25%, no actual net savings.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

There are very few points on which I agree with Senator Obama, but he’s absolutely right on this one. What’s 18 cents when gasoline costs four dollars a gallon?! Suspension of the Federal gasoline tax will also suspend highway projects, putting many construction workers out of a job. This makes NO sense to me.
What we NEED to do is tell the enviro-fanatics to shut up and let us drill and pump our OWN oil (sensibly) instead of being permanently dependent on the Muslims.

Posted by: Rhys | May 1, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

In Our state they give sales tax holidays what can it hurt if we can spend billions on everything and any thing why not a sales tax break.

Posted by: Bishop | May 1, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

What do Hillary Clinton, George Bush and John McCain have in common?
These three amigos, are are peddling deceptive remedies to the Gas Price Problem.
Bush says stupid stuff that is demonstratively false about ANWAR saving the day on energy needs. And he believes that you may be stupid enough to fall for it.
Enter Hillary Clinton and John McCain who take up the Bush Stupidity Challenge by offering a Magic Holiday. They both expect alotta you to fall for the B.S., too.
Bush sets a shameless Course and Hills and John are happily following

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 1, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Mark – You miss the point. Because all of the other prices are going up, any money I save from gas prices goes to offset the higher price of food/groceries and mortgage but I’m still BEHIND in total $ because of the overall impact. Hence, thoughts of driving to the beach are just those – thoughts, but happy ones.
The gas tax holiday, as proposed by HRC with offset of windfall tax on oil cos, is no different than the stimulus package which Obama did support — and which most economists will also say has little or no effect on the economy …because most people are going to use it to pay off existing debts/obligations and necessities instead of creating new buying power. It’s inconsistent for Obama to vote YES on the stimulus check and NO on the gas tax — both of which are short-term RELIEF measures.
Where’s the outrage over that? Is it the principles that drive you, or the $$ involved?

Posted by: UhNo | May 1, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Well Obama, considering that your campaign is the master of gimmicks, it really must bug you.

Posted by: irma | May 1, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

JAKE – SHAME ON YOU FOR NOT REPORTING THAT OBAMA VOTED FOR 3 GAS TAX HOLIDAYS IN ILLINOIS! OF COURSE, HE’S NOW JUST GRANDSTANDING. POLITICS AS USUAL.

Posted by: tony | May 1, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

No’Bama… First of all, I am an Independent and proud of it. I’ve also been called a “centrist” and an “isolationist”, which are also compliments. But I am NOT a Democrat, thank you!
13 or 14 cents is not “horrible”, but three dollars IS! The last time I worked in a service station (which I did for almost 4 years), we were selling gasoline for 38.9 cents a gallon. To me, paying ten times that price is unpleasant, although realistically I know it cannot be sold for 39 cents anymore. But cutting the price by 18 cents to stop highway and infrastructure projects seems awfully stupid to me. That will do far more harm than good. And would you start driving more if gasoline averages $3.82 instead of four dollars a gallon? Not me!

Posted by: Rhys | May 1, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

UhNo-
The difference between the stimulus and gas tax is that people will actually get a check in the mail, the gas tax is no guarantee that people will see a decrease in price at the pump. As the demand increases so does the price. So your logic is flawed that it is the same. The stimulus injects money into peoples pockets, the gas bill would either delay the inevitable rise of gas prices or even more likely no one will see a price drop whatsoever.

Posted by: mark | May 1, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

I’ll take Reagan’s one-handed economist over most of the views here.

Posted by: Sandy | May 1, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

irma talking about elitism is rich.
Yesterday Hillary admits she does not know how the Pay at the Pump works because she’s had a Chauffeur for the last 20 years.
And then, Hills can’t figure out how to pour herself a cup of joe inside the Gas Station.
Ya – real common touch.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 1, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Obama did support gas tax holidays at the state level. When analysis (a key part of experience) showed that the consumer did not benefit, Obama chose to not support a national gas tax holiday even though it would have appeased many simpletons.

Posted by: X marks the spot | May 1, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Mark – The time value of money is a real issue … if you want to bump the economy up, it’s a series of consistent upticks as opposed to one big silver bullet.
A delay in rising gas prices is real money in the moment it happens. You might view the potential benefit as incremental if you’re a suburban, SUV-driving, arugula -eating employed citizen. But, if your circumstances place you on the margin, short-term inputs right now can make a difference.
And still, show me one analyst who has considered the broader implications on trucking/transportation where nominal differentials in unit pricing add up to more signficant savings?
In the end, it’s short-term relief absolutely — but do you not give a starving man a meal today because you can’t feed him tomorrow?

Posted by: UhNo | May 1, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

PRESIDENT OBAMA
…you might as well get used to it!

Posted by: It's over | May 1, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

McCain knows nothing about the economy and admits as much. All he knows is war. A vote for McCain is a vote for World War III and 8 years of unparalleled financial disaster. Temperamental 72 year old POWs who married into wealth, own 8 homes, and bend over backwards to accomodate corporate interests every chance they get do not necessarily make the best leaders. McCain is not going to do you or your children any good; if you aren’t already filthy rich he is going to make your life harder and send your children to die in the Middle East. McCain isn’t a bad guy on a personal level, he’s likable, but if you vote for him you are flushing this country and thousands of human lives straight down the toilet. Then again, if you voted Bush in and your conscience still hasn’t caught up with you after 8 years, you’re either hopelessly naive, just plain heartless, or listen to way too much right-wing talk radio BS. Wake up and grow up and do the right thing for a change. This isn’t a game: one more run of dishonest, misguided Republican rule and the US is going to collapse like the Roman Empire.

Posted by: Common Sense | May 1, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Nat… things can change between now and November, but the LATEST polls show Hillary Clinton COULD defeat Old Man McCain, but Obama could not.

Posted by: Rhys | May 1, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

What about Lawn care people and construction workers and every other person that has to use a car or truck. that 18 cents a gallon is a big saving and she said she would make it up from a windfall tax.on oil profits

Posted by: Bishop | May 1, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“PRESIDENT OBAMA
…you might as well get used to it!”
What’s the next sentence? Move to Canada?

Posted by: Rhys | May 1, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

In spite of all her “warts”, Hillary Clinton is America’s best choice among the three candidates still in the running. She’s the only one of the three who can be considered a “moderate” by any measurement. Haven’t you had enough far right versus far left?

Posted by: Rhys | May 1, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Has it occurred to anyone that if too many taxes are “suspended” our rebate checks could bounce?

Posted by: Rhys | May 1, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

You’ve got to love that Obama voted for a gas tax holiday three times in Illinois, but now that his ivory tower buddies are telling him it’s not sound public policy, too bad for the nation’s drivers.
That’s why he’s sinking like a rock in Indiana, and in the national poll of polls as well. Keep your eye on things, supers! Doesn’t make much sense to over-rely on old contests that were held 4+ months ago!

Posted by: commonsensenj | May 1, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

A – If you have to call yourself intelligent and educated makes me wonder just how intelligent and educated you are. Certainly your writing is no more intelligent then a sixth grader.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | May 1, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Obama on the TODAY Show 5/1/08:
“After those San Francisco remarks, he was hit with the elitist tag.
Obama knows why he’s attracted the attacks. “Here I am. An African-American named Barack Obama who’s running for president,” he said with a chuckle. “I mean, that’s a leap for folks.””

Posted by: LindaJ | May 1, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

More BS from BO that turns my stomach.
An American vote for Barack is an American vote for disaster.
Scary times.

Posted by: catherine in nm | May 1, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Here I am an AA here I am an AA that is all we have heard but don’t anyone dare use the race card unless it’s Obama

Posted by: Bishop | May 1, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Apparently the MAJORITY of the democratic party is a bunch of elitists. That’s why Barack leads in States Won, Votes, and Delegates.
Those darn elitist Democrats – don’t they know that the multi-millionare, corporate sponsored Clintons really understand the average American?

Posted by: Elitist | May 1, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Obama voted 3 times for a tax break from gas taxes while an illinios state senator
damn he’s two faced

Posted by: tannie | May 1, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

“Obama knows why he’s attracted the attacks. “Here I am. An African-American named Barack Obama who’s running for president,” he said with a chuckle. “I mean, that’s a leap for folks.””
gee, there he goes again.
He’s equally a European american, but he’s dumped those who raised him for Rev. wright (who he’s also dumped)

Posted by: Sonya | May 1, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

i think the gas price is not high enough. we need to drive less and develop alternative energy.

Posted by: joe miller | May 1, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

OhNo-
You are basing your whole argument on idea that this will lower gas prices. Which economists, professionals analyzing the situation say otherwise.
You are absolutely right — IF the price was reduced it would save money on transport of goods, truckers etc. But what you are failing to recognize is that the revenue lost for infrastructure, roads and transportation would offset this “savings” Plus thats a big IF.
Did you know that bad roads contribute to lower your mpg? Worse roads mean more wear and tear on cars, all these will end up adding up to a complete offset to the $30 you save over the summer, then its back to normal rising gas prices, all of this is of course implying that the gas bill will reduce prices, which I think is quite a stretch.
The starving man is quite a touching analogy but it fails to factor in the oil companies that will increase the price of gas if we reduce the tax. So your starving man still starves.

Posted by: Mark | May 1, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

God. I am sooooo sick of barack obama

Posted by: andrea | May 1, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

On the 28 bucks, I think Obama’s point is that 28 bucks isn’t going to make all that much diffence to anyones life. Its not going to make things easier for many people, and the fact that 28 bucks might be 5 hours work for some Americans says more about the poorness of the American economy more than it does about the fuel tax holiday. And who is going to benefit most? Any lowering of any sales tax benefits those who spend the most (ie the rich) so its actually yet another tax break for those who need it least.

Posted by: markymark | May 1, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

It is more than thirty dollars for some
and when you are rolling your spare change to put in your tank or paying high prices in the food store it does make it easier for some.

Posted by: Bishop | May 1, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

The ceo of shell yesterday morning said if we drilled for more oil in the US it would be cheaper with a big smrik on his face.

Posted by: Bishop | May 1, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Mark – Starving man still starves? Are you another one of those “smart” and “educated” Obama groupies who refuse to think outside the box? Gas tax reprieve will damage road construction and so on? Duh? Perhaps you can say that in isolation if that was the “only” program Hillary proposed but if you were to include Hillary’s entire platform which includes roads, check and balances on the oil industry, and I do work for big oil, and so then we’re getting somewhere. Which also gives valuable time for the nation’s industries to get back on its feet. And trust me fuel savings does affect the nation and its people as a whole.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | May 1, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

A – I’ll ask you the same question. How will Obama get enough delegates to put him over the top?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | May 1, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I owe so many of you Hillary supporters a debt of gratitude for making me laugh so much today. Anyone who honestly thinks that she will make America better is really wasting their time and that of the country’s. Go home to your boring husband, Hillary, and enjoy your $109 million and the chauffer! Welcome President Obama! Finally, someone who really matters!

Posted by: Mrs. Tiggywinkle | May 1, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Wow, when mccain said he didn’t know anything about the economy he was really doing some “straight-talkin”. It’s just like Obama to tell the real story. Isn’t it time we had a different kind of leader. Obama 2008!

Posted by: pt | May 1, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Almost every one I know right now is struggling to make ends meet. Every little bit helps. When the government is going to give a break to the middle class, no matter how small, we have to grab it. Obama voted for such gas tax breaks 3 times in the Illinois legislature, so why is he now against it? If he becomes president and some other tax relief comes up for the middle/working class, will he veto that too because it’s “a gimmick”. He’s out of touch and his empty campaign rhetoric is out of time.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 1, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Clinton campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson pushed back hard this morning when a reporter asked about her seeming to say that rich people, like herself, deserve all the opportunities they get. During her appearance on Bill O’Reilly’s show on FoxNews, the bombastic host was clearly worried that her pledge to repeal the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy — “I’m a rich guy” — would hit him in the wallet.
Said Clinton: “Rich people, God bless us. We deserve all the opportunities to make sure our country and our blessings continue until the next generation.”
Asked about it in a conference call this morning, Wolfson insisted that Clinton had actually said “God blessed us.” The next sentence, he said, was just her talking about how all Americans — rich and poor — deserve good things. Except, of course, that’s not what she said.

Posted by: Becky | May 1, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

What do they know? – Same “expert” who say no to universal health care maybe? Every other civilized western nation on earth has proven them wrong. Exactly. They’re only “experts” pushing one more point of view. Its just a matter of which group of “experts” do you choose to use?

Posted by: Dogsoldier | May 1, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

I would be curious what these economists’ predictions are for the tourist industry this summer, how many businesses will end up in bankruptcy and how many employees hired for the summer will be laid off before the 4th of July?

Posted by: Ken | May 1, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

A – Why are Clinton supporters so ignorant?
==============================
When you find yourself asking stupid question perhaps the answer lies with the questioner.

Posted by: Dogsoldier | May 1, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

The whole debate is pretty silly. In the end, the two candidate’s supporters will kiss and make up. So why all the hate?

Posted by: Aston | May 1, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

I’m looking at pricing sensitivity, not lower prices. The published economists are basing arguments according to old patterns applied in a vacuum: 1) increased demand puts pressure on supply (along w/the seasonal switchoff) which leads to summer price increases and 2) lifting the tax flows through the supply chain with decreased impact on the consumer since there’s no requirement/incentive on the suppliers to share it all.
But w/increased pricing everywhere, there’s also evidence to show that consumers are cutting back on gas consumption both b/c of the price of gas itself and b/c of the need to pay for other things. Ditto for small business and big business. As people cut back, suppliers at the bottom of the supply chain (not MOBILEXXON, etc) get hit by increased competition which can lead some of them to sacrifice margin to make up volume.
The real question is which one wins in the end –which goes to the pricing sensitivity issue. Given current state of economy, there’s no certainty that gas demand outpaces the cost increases of food, material, or other goods.
At worst, the tax holiday (if crafted w/offset revenue as HRC’s plan would) is no harm, no foul in that it takes some of the sting out of even higher prices. At best, it actually impacts people’s pocketbooks which could help keep momentum on any jump that comes from stimulus check.
Your reaction to the starving man analogy is telling. Too many of the tax holiday critics are dismissing the holiday because it doesnt answer long-term needs, only short-term. However, any long term solution requires more time than is available to many people — this “perfection is the enemy of the good” perspective really translates into letting some people suffer now with an eye on possible future gains, and misses the cumulative impact that declines in individual spending has on the overall economy.
In the end, this is all a lot of furor over nothing – because this do-nothing congress isn’t going to touch the issue.

Posted by: UhNo | May 1, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

AP Factcheck released information on the 3 votes that Mr. Obama cast as an Illinois senator in favor of gas tax holiday.
Flip-flop or insincere? Perhaps, both.

Posted by: Onlooker | May 1, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

“How will Obama get enough delegates to put him over the top?”
Perhaps because he has more votes, more states won, and more pledged delegates and thus has earned the nomination; the remaining supers to vote for him.
I’d say that’s more compelling than the “I say I’m better even though the majority of voters disagreed and I didn’t win in any catagory arguement.”
Or the “The way I count, I win” arguement.
Of course, Dean and his henchmen could always decide that the entire primary process doesn’t matter and just broker their own candidate. Yes, they “could”, according to Dean, “but that’s NEVER happened and is very unlikely.”
That answer your question?

Posted by: answer the obvious | May 1, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

and …her economic change with this gas tax…is going to take away from infrastructure …you know the thing that is crumbling in our country and in another ten years if we don’t do something about it …we are going to be in a worse situation than wwe are now…
her windfall profits tax that she and Obama are talking about can’t get passed in her first term…(just like her healthcare plan that doesn’t deal with anyof the issues that are really driving costs up in healthcare will NEVER be passed as she has it…because the costs have to brought in relation to the rest of the economy FIRST before you switch over a massive bureaucratic change like that or you will have a MASSIVE increase in price and/or failure of the system…but she won’t tell you that)
so this money she is saying she is going to get to replace the windfall profits tax is bait and switch.
Look at the statistics behind people/numbers and this windfall profits tax it is going to be as hard or harder than anything we have tried to pass in the past 8 years…(because to be honest it will drive prices up but atleast much of that money will go to back to the American people instead of the oil companies)
she is lying to you all again.
atleast McCain isn’t telling you he is going to pay for it when he CAN’T
this woman is disgusting.

Posted by: dl | May 1, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Barack himself is the gimmick.

Posted by: prof | May 1, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Hillary can get her healthcare/Insurance plan passed because the insurance lobbyists want it passed. Whatever they have to spend, it will be worth it to them because everyone will have to buy from them, they will be the new oil industry.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Keep in mind that that $28 bucks in savings that people think is so critical to them, that is $28 dollars spent over 4 months and assumes a full tank of gas each week. I would suggest that if the $28 is that important to you over that period of time, you are not likely to be filling up yoru tank on a weekly basis and would therefore not save that much anywway, assumign the gas prices stayed as they were yesterday, which they did not.

Posted by: Louis | May 1, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

This is the difference between Obama and the last millenium candidates. THey’re living in the past; he’s not. When high gas prices are now finally, for the first time making people change their gas guzzling habits (listen to NPR today), the old school polital panderers buy a few votes by selling bridge and highway repairs for the cost of a fast food dinner for two per voter.

Posted by: sean o | May 1, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Prof. Yes, you’re right. Barack himself IS a gimmick.

Posted by: irma | May 1, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

irma talking about elitism is rich.
Yesterday Hillary admits she does not know how Pay at the Pump works because she’s had a Chauffeur for the last 20 years.
And then, Hills can’t figure out how to pour herself a cup of joe inside the Gas Station.
Ya – real common touch.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 1, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Who is the elitest who doesn’t worry about the common people who need gas to drive to work or chauffer their children, much less needing to visit Grandma or have a little mini vacation trip? He just does not get it. We all know that we need a long term solution, too. This is about allowing people to survive. Most people need gas to go to work, if they have not lost their jobs. Then, I guess they need to buy gas to go look for a job. Save the people now! For crying out loud, he is so green that he just doesn’t get it.

Posted by: georgia | May 1, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Besides 4 years for Jimmy Carter. Bill Clinton is the only democrat they have had in 40 years. He balanced the budget, No wars, what do they expect. He spent all his time in Starr’s court. We should be happy getting a new Clinton

Posted by: james | May 2, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Obama is only against a gas tax holiday, because McCain and HRC were first to suggest it and beat Obama to the idea. He does not want to look like a follower, and has to save face for not thinking of it first. The proof is in the pudding. In 2000 as an Illinois State Senator, Obama voted for an Illinois State gas tax holiday 3 times. Obama has now been caught playing old style obstructionist politics, just because it wasn’t his idea. It proves that his claim that he will bring a new kind of politics to Washington, is nothing but false rhetoric.

Posted by: KDH55 | May 2, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am

I think it a gimmic
Well may be the $28 can by four gallions of milk not text books as some suggested you may could have gotten a used student guide with $28 twenty years ago. Please tell all the politian. and media people Text books cost between $175 & $275

Posted by: Lorenda Johnson | May 5, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.