Obama Says Childers’ Win is Proof of his MI Chances
ABC News’ David Wright, Andy Fies and Sunlen Miller Report: Senator Obama used Congressman-elect Travis Childers’ win last night in a Mississippi special election as proof that he can beat John McCain in Michigan.
Obama, in his first visit to Michigan since June, told a Warren audience that regardless of the fierce Republican attacks, the Democratic candidate was still able to win over a Republican seat.
“They just lost an election yesterday in the heart of Mississippi,” Obama said of the Republicans, “They were trying to do every trick in the book to try to scare folks in Mississippi and it didn’t work.”
The Republican party of Mississippi ran ads in the special election trying to link Childers with Obama– attempting to turn white conservatives away from voting for Childers.
“They did everything they could to, you know – they ran ads with my face on it and they said, ‘oh you know look at this – you know former liberal and you know his former pastor said offensive things.’” Obama said referencing the Mississippi Republicans party’s ads which evoked his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
Obama argued that even with these tactics, the Democrat won in a Republican stronghold by eight points – which he claimed is proof that the chances for him, in a match up with McCain, in states like Mississippi are good.
“The reason it didn’t work is because the American people know we need a new direction in Washington," said Obama. "That’s why we’re gonna win Michigan, that’s why we’re gonna beat John McCain here in Michigan."
This marks Obama’s first campaign event in Michigan since the state was stripped of its delegates because the state, like Florida, held its primary earlier than allowed by the DNC’s rules.
Obama reminded the crowd that his poor showing in the Michigan primary, which Clinton won, was because he was following the rules.
“Because of the whole hoopla around when Michigan held its primary, my name was not on the ballot," Obama said. "We did not do campaigning here and I just want to remind everybody that wasn’t my choosing.”
Obama said that if he is the nominee he will guarantee that the Michigan delegation is seated at the convention.
The Senator unveiled a manufacturing agenda aiming to fuel innovation and boost the economy. Obama, wearing a flag pin, spent his morning meeting with workers and touring the Chrysler Stamping Plant in Sterling Heights, an attempt to woo key working class voters.
Obama focused all his criticisms in opening remarks on the presumed Republican candidate John McCain, “When John McCain came to Michigan in January and said that we couldn’t bring back all the jobs that we couldn’t bring back all the jobs that had been lost back to America, he was right. We can’t bring back every single job. But where he’s wrong was in suggesting that there’s nothing we can do to replace those jobs or create new ones.”
Watch video of Obama knocking McCain and discussing his job policy HERE.
Obama continued to tie McCain to George Bush’s policies of the last eight years – saying that’s “essentially giving up.”
The McCain camp released a statement today refutting Obama’s claims.
"Senator Obama launched a partisan-style attack questioning John McCain’s straight talk, without providing any evidence of his own leadership or experience on the issues that are hurting Michigan and states like it,” Tucker Bounds, McCain spokesman said in a paper statement.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Yup, but You, Mr. BHO, lost 41 points in a swing state, being presumed nominee. Do we have a problem here, duh?
Posted by: fool | May 14, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Boy this guy is arrogant. No mention of his 41% loss in the heart of Deomcratic America?
Posted by: geevill | May 14, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Boy this guy is arrogant. No mention of his 41% loss in the heart of Democratic America?
Posted by: geevill | May 14, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
What he isn’t saying is that Childers did everything he could to distance himself from Obama.
Posted by: Kris | May 14, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
A person out of race for 5 months almost beat BO!!!!
Man, what the world is going on?
Posted by: Olbermnn3 | May 14, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Obama with his “typical” remarks….go figure!
Posted by: david from texas | May 14, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Democrats will win Michigan if Clinton is the nominee, otherwise, Michigan will go to McCain.
Posted by: david from texas | May 14, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
“Obama said that if he is the nominee he will guarantee that the Michigan delegation is seated at the convention”
and if he is not the nominee he will give Michigan the finger like he gave Clinton and West Virginia.
Posted by: geevill | May 14, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Obama didn’t win any swing states, didn’t win any big states (except his home Illinois), didn’t win blue-collar in any states.
Why do we want him to be nominee?
What are the superdelegates doing??
Posted by: golfgirlusa | May 14, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
What’s this about Chris Matthews calling HRC “The Al Sharpton of White People”?
Now that is funny.
Posted by: The IN-famous El Guapo | May 14, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
White people don’t matter; according to Obama and the democratic party.
Posted by: CJ | May 14, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Last time I checked MI was the abbreviation for Michigan and MS was Mississippi…
Posted by: Dem in Chicago | May 14, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Travis Childers of Mississippi espouses political views consistent with those of Pat Buchanan and Lou Dobbs. How does help Barack Obama in Mississippi?
Posted by: althusius | May 14, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Travis Childers denounced Obama; said he’s never met him!
Posted by: CJ | May 14, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Barak is a loser. Too bad the dems won’t wake up in time.
Dem who is now Indy.
Posted by: al | May 14, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Lets not forget West Virginia only has 28 delegates.
And Obama would not be the democratic nominee if he had a “white voters” problem.
He’s only won 3-4 States with a heavy AA vote.
Obama has won the endorsement of 4 SDs today… WV who??? lol
Posted by: Vanessa | May 14, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
The Dems will get what they deserve!
Posted by: CJ | May 14, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
You’re almost correct, although you undercounted by two.
I actually saw 59 stars. I guess he did say he had visited 57 but didn’t go to Hawaii or Alaska. If I remember correctly.
Posted by: Brent | May 14, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
“Because of the whole hoopla around when Michigan held its primary, my name was not on the ballot,” Obama said. ….
???
He makes it sound like some passive accident, but he CHOSE to TAKE his name OFF the ballot. He should admit it – and then explain why.
Posted by: Davis | May 14, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Quite a thumping you took in WV yesterday, big BO. What makes you think Michigan will be any different?
Mississippi voted for Childers, not for you. In spite of you, BO, not because of you.
Posted by: Emily | May 14, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
BHO would only carry Detroit. The rest of the state would go for McCain. Given!
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Arrogant Presumption….. He is asked a question about his running mate and says that it would be presumptuous to talk about a VP pick when he hasn’t even secured the nomination. YET… he has racheted up the criticisms on McCain and campaigns in a swing state that ALREADY VOTED in the Democratic Primary.
NOW, he points to Childers as being an example of HIS opportunities in Mississippi. Words Matter as Obama put it. So, why not be the team player and say the Childers victory is an example of A DEMOCRATS opportunities in Mississippi.
But he can’t… why ???
ARROGANT PRESUMPTION………
Posted by: MM | May 14, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
BHO chose to take his name off MI ballot for no other reason, but pandering voters in Iowa. He bribed them by telling Iowans he is with them, by stripping the right to vote in MI and FL.
He succeeded his pandering and won Iowa.
Posted by: Olbermnn3 | May 14, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
It is so interesting to hear the conversation about Clinton’s win in West Virginia–that this is a warning for Obama.
Does anyone remember that Obama beat Clinton in Hawaii by 76% to 24%? It is also a State in the U.S. and it is about the same size as West Virginia.
Regardless of what color, or what class or what educational level the people are who are voting for Obama, the main quality difference is that there are more of them because he has more popular votes, more elected delegates, more superdelegates and more states won.
Hillary’s campaign was doomed from the start. She employed principles of the white male paradigm to determine how she was going to win the election. The white male paradigm for running for President in the U.S. is:
1. I’m white
2. I’m male
3. White people in the U.S. are more plentiful and they will vote for me, a white male,
4. I need only the “big” states where white people are
5. I can ignore the Caucus states
6. I can depend on big donors to raise money because as a privileged white male, I have access to such people
Hillary used this paradigm even though she was an unconventional candidate for President. How sad! That’s like a women taking a stress test to detect heart disease by taking a stress test that was designed for men.
Obama, on the other hand, knew he had to rewrite the paradigm. His paradigm is based on these principles:
1. I am an African American male
2. U.S. has many diverse people
3. No all white people are racists
4. Every state is important, no matter how small
5. I don’t come from wealth or fame so I don’t have one person who can give me $1,000,000.
6. But, my 1,000,000 non rich ordinary friends can give me $50 each which will result in millions of dollars
7. I will preach a message of change, not simply because I can bring change but because AMERICA HAS ALREADY CHANGED!
Herein lies the difference.
Go on you pundits, keep preachin’ and dissecting American citizens into groups, income levels, education levels, skin colors, etc. In the final analysis, it’s who has the most votes.
AAC
Posted by: AAC | May 14, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
I see all the Bad News Bears have come out to play again today. Well, have at it and have fun if this kind of ugliness is what floats your boat. It doesn’t mine, for I am only interested in the good of our nation. Looks, pantsuits, color of skin, age, gender, flag pins, Rev. Wrights, Keating 5′s, Lewinskis, are all old c r a p thrown around today as if they hold something of importance. The only thing I see is a future, and a brighter one if we can find away to dwell on what’s really important and then pull all our resources and assets together.
YESSSSS !! That just might save us. Otherwise, well you know what they say about a House Divided, well don’t you?
Posted by: Ellen | May 14, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Well, I live in Colorado, which is also a swing state, and Obama won in Colorado by around 40% also. Some of the comments here are really absurd. Calling him arrogant because he didn’t mention his 40 point loss in W. Va.? Umm… is he supposed to bring this up in every speech? During plenty of speeches by Clinton following losses she never mentioned her losses from prior days. Just absurd double standards, and as for the stupid flag pin, I’ve never seen Clinton or McCain wear on either….
Posted by: Jeff | May 14, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Hawaii= his “home” state!!
Posted by: justme2see | May 14, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
It’s amazing to see the intelligence of Hillary voters. How pathetic.
Posted by: E.B | May 14, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
1% for John McCain? No different than Indiana. They are not worrying about voting for him now he is the GOP nominee! He is not even campaigning very hard in these last states.
Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 14, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Whether Sen. Obama or Sen. McCain, our country will get exactly what it deserves. The choice will be ours.
Posted by: Martymar | May 14, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Barack, plays by the rules? Now that’s funny!
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 14, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
His Royal Highness Obama had to finally wear a flag pin to pander to us idiotic White Asian and Latino trash. How pathetic.
Posted by: Brent | May 14, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Obama is the only one offering to help those thirty years old and below. All the old timers do not want this to happen. They want to keep pouring their debt on us while they reap the cash.
Posted by: AmericaNeedsChange | May 14, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
I’m sick and tired of the media talking about the African-American vote. Obama will win some southern states because of the African-American vote. The media are the ones that created this divide. I’m African-American and a Hillary supporter. I will not vote for Obama in the General Election. I will sit this one out. Here we go again, putting up another John Kerry, Al Gore nominee. These are white guys and they lost the GE. I’m sick of the Democratic Party because they have become disorganized and weird.
Posted by: Lois, California | May 14, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Republicans are losing because their constituency does not trust them. The are distrusted – not because of corruption or gas rates or foreclosures; the mistrust comes from the inability of conservative politicians to be “conservative”. McCain will lose because registered “R”s will not go out to vote for him. He’s a fraud – and an irascible, belligerent one at that. Bush betrayed conservatives and McCain never liked them to begin with. Conservatives will stay home. Obama will be the next president. The landslide will be his, not McCain’s. The Dems I know love Obama. The Reps I know hate McCain. I don’t love Obama, but I don’t hate the kid. McCain – I hate that old b******
Posted by: JDW | May 14, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Sen. Obama forgets that he fights with Sen. McCain in November for the White House. So, Democrats’ party could not make a decision on who will be the USA President as they made decision on who is Democrats’ nominee.
Posted by: Allison | May 14, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
WV was tailor made for Clintons demographics. Had yesterdays primary been VA instead, the story and spin would be different.
He would have lost WV at anypoint during the primary. He crushed her in SC and will win OR next week.
What will she say then?
At the end of the day, he wins. More delegates, more states wons, added new swings states, pop vote and new voters.
Posted by: DS | May 14, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Typical Americans are against Obama.
Posted by: Mack | May 14, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Hillary was suppose to win the nomination and lost it. Obama was suppose to show face and prepare for future elections and he ended up winning. FL and MI doesn’t count because of party rules, and anyoe who thinks that race does cut deep in the US is an idiot. We are still trying to tackle race issues in this country and what better way to do so then to have a candidate who stares the problem right in the face. Hillary can’t manager her own campaign, how will she be able to manage this country. We already have economic problems in this country, we cannot afford to see more error in the white house.
Posted by: DC | May 14, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Obama has lost 2 states by margin of 40+%. Hillary has lost 15 states by 40+%. Obama will put more states into play in the general, Hillary will have only Ohio and Florida. I’ve said before I’ll say it again. Obama will make Republican sweat to keep the south while he will focus on His available swing states, Michigan, Virgina, and Missouri. He can possible get South Carolina and Georgia. Obama is a better candidate that why the math is on his side.
Posted by: MM | May 14, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Steve_NJ,
Thanks, this will be my agruement whenever another Hillary supporter tags Obama with the “57 states” comment.
Posted by: Vanessa | May 14, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Hillary Clinton is the AL SHARPTON of white people.
NOW THAT IS FUNNY!
Posted by: Obie | May 14, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Hang in there Obama supporters. In about 20 days or so, the Clinton presidential campaign will be dead and buried. There’s precious little they can do about it.
Posted by: James | May 14, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
College towns like Ann Arbor and Lansing will go for OBama big time.
Posted by: obie | May 14, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Barry Dukakis…nuff said
Posted by: Mack | May 14, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
When is somebody going to pin Obama down on his definition of “poor”, “middleclass” and “rich”? If elected, I believe that many couples earning a combined annual salary of around $100,000 will be very surprised to find that they are the “rich that must pay their fair share”.
Posted by: Kathy | May 14, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Admit it or not:
Obama won’t go anyhere without Clintons..
Dems can’t win back W.H. without Clintons..
Posted by: True Truth | May 14, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Kathy
Obama definition of Poor – living on food stamps, living in Indonesia, Hawaii, going to school on scholarships, single mother.
Obama definition of MiddleClass – hardworking civil wrights lawyer, $30,000 in debt due to college loans.
Obama definition of Rich – Mr. Buffet nuff said.
Posted by: MM | May 14, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
The new and improved Barry Obama. Tastes great and is less filling!
Brought to you by your friends at the DNC and the MSM!
Posted by: Mack | May 14, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
BHO family working the systems. Mom – career student 2 degrees going for Doctorate. Chose not to have a job & leave off the state!
Posted by: T | May 14, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
If working one’s way up from the bottom up makes you elitist. Then All candidates are guilty except McCain, because he married money. It seems to me that everyone knows Obama is not elitist, people just needed an excuse not to vote for Obama. Therefore they would have never voted for Obama anyway.
Posted by: MM | May 14, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Voters won’t be fooled by Obama’s statement that he’ll do everything he has to to seat the Florida and Michigan delegations ONCE he is the nominee.
p.s., Clinton didn’t campaign in Michigan and Florida either but she still won.
Posted by: s. valenti | May 14, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
On just need to echo AAC’s comments. It is to the core point…..
“……Obama, on the other hand, knew he had to rewrite the paradigm. His paradigm is based on these principles:
1. I am an African American male
2. U.S. has many diverse people
3. No all white people are racists
4. Every state is important, no matter how small
5. I don’t come from wealth or fame so I don’t have one person who can give me $1,000,000.
6. But, my 1,000,000 non rich ordinary friends can give me $50 each which will result in millions of dollars
7. I will preach a message of change, not simply because I can bring change but because AMERICA HAS ALREADY CHANGED!
Herein lies the difference.
Go on you pundits, keep preachin’ and dissecting American citizens into groups, income levels, education levels, skin colors, etc. In the final analysis, it’s who has the most votes……”
Posted by: K Brown | May 14, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Super delegates need to be asking themselves, if down ticket democrats don’t want to appear with Obama, then we must have a problem.
Posted by: s. valenti | May 14, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Wow!!! Reading some of the comments posted made me realize the race issues we have in America.. Its pretty sad but intersting.. :-)
Posted by: Rino | May 14, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
The good people of WV were clinging to their votes and not letting Obama have any. Now who’s bitter.
Posted by: Mack | May 14, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
The DNC is gasping it’s last breath!
Posted by: justme2see | May 14, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
There might be many negative things that you can say about Mr. Obama, but trying to imply that he is stupid because of his slip of the tongue about the number of states that he visited, is ridiculous.
He graduated at the top of his class from Harvard!
Not only is he one of the most intelligent people that I have observed, he has vision and reasoning abilities.
I would rather have a person as president with the above attributes, than a person who is great at arguing about things that make her appear that she knows what she is talking about.
What happened to the importance of integrity? Do you think that world leaders will trust a president who is not trustworthy?
Posted by: linda bowens | May 14, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Justme2see
Vote McCain and the war continues, and the recession continues. You guys in your Hillary or else bubble need to wake up. There is too much at stake to vote against your own interest. People are counting on us to make the best decision. Hillary ran her champaign and lost pure and simple.
Posted by: MM | May 14, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
What happened to experience?????? He does not have the resume for POTUS!!
Posted by: justme2see | May 14, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
The DNC is the epitome of what’s wrong with the Government. The people that what to dictate our future can’t even get their primary in order. If they had to work in the real world, they all would have been canned a long time ago. They should take one of their many recesses and never come back. What a fiasco.
Posted by: Mack | May 14, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
This democrat winning the seat in MI is because these people are still upset with how the bush-league handled katrina. This will be a trend this fall and will put a lot more states in play for Obama. People are really fed up with the bush/cheney arrogant attitude. Look for a landslide this fall against mc-more-war. Obama 2008!
Posted by: pt | May 14, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
when I see how Obama won the white vote in Iowa and lost the white vote in WVA then I wouldn’t lay the blame on race bias, just voter ignorance.
Posted by: wlbill | May 14, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Obama wants to tax capital. His tax plan will add up to a 39.6% personal income tax, a 52.2% combined income and payroll tax, a 28%capital gains tax, a 39% dividend tax and a 55% estate tax. A huge percentage of citizens have money invested in the market, when the parents of baby boomers pass on, Uncle Sam will get 55% of of the inheritence. So get ready to be fleeced “middle class” and good luck keeping your jobs.
Posted by: Kathy | May 14, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
justme,,, let’s see when dubya got elected gas was $1.59 gallon, this morning I paid $3.76… Do I really want a 3rd bush term with mc-more-war…NO NO NO… Obama 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | May 14, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
In a climate of needed change,the need for a new direction, the need for a better America, it is befuddling to me how a presidential candidate could be that proud of this win having openly and flagrantly played the race card on the road to achieving it.
Hillary would have created a much much better impression across the board had she just simply gone in there and conducted and issue oriented campaigned knowing full well that she would have won anyways.
It has to be clear to all the good people of this country who has been pushing and playing the race reminders all along. Clearly it is not Barack Obama as any intelligent person could deduce. The fact that WV supported her method of operation makes the case only for that state and one state at that. The voice of “America” is plenty bigger than WV.
BO and his team got my vote because clearly they are the only ones actually trying to fix this country – live out its creed. Indeed one has to be forever mindful that some like the folks of WV would like it to remain as is………..BUT NOT THIS TIME…THIS TIME……….
Posted by: K Brown | May 14, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
While Obama took the legal halftime break, Hillary stayed on the field and scored touchdowns against the Obama band and now wants to count those touchdowns aginst Obama. It don’t work with Florida State and Michigan State, what makes any of you Hillariets think Obama will stand for it?????
Posted by: wlbill | May 14, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Regardless of who heads the ticket in November, the Democrats will unite and defeat the Republicans. It is obvious that most of the posts here are from individuals who have ulterior motives. But true Democrats understand the issues and will not be misled. We know that people are more concerned with real issues and are not interested in the vitriolic nonsense being spewed here. The comments lend absolutely nothing to the conversation. They are just hateful and ignorant.
Posted by: Debbie | May 14, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Sincerely this election has shown that American people has a long away to go, We have shown the rest of world that we are the custodian of racism, no fairness, no justice, we are just camouflaging, from your reactions, racist runs in your blood, Obama is sincere and love our country more.
Posted by: jerry | May 14, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Obama doesn’t wear a flag pin = unpatriotic.
Obama does wear a flag pin = pandering. You guys are great – keep it up.
Posted by: Watson | May 14, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Obama is a symbol of change to the new world.
Posted by: rico,naija. | May 14, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Obama is a symbol of change to the new world.
Posted by: rico,naija. | May 14, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Someone hinted at this, but I want to state it starkly. In response to someone above alleging Obama didn’t carry any “swing states” or “working-class states”, my response is Missouri & Wisconsin, respectively.
In Missouri, he beat Clinton by a narrow margin by bringing in vote from the cities. Missouri general elections also tend to be close (i.e. Caskell v. Talent), it is definitely a swing state.
He won Wisconsin, a state in the rustbelt with a low percentage of African Americans. RealClearPolitics shows that McCain would carry Wisconsin against Clinton, but not Wisconsin. There, he was able to make inroads into Hillary’s traditional support groups.
I’m not for Obama, but as a Republitarian in a bad election season for the center-right, I ask myself: Who would I rather put up with for years as my President if a Democrat must win? I’d much rather have Obama.
Since Mitt’s out, and Ron Paul won’t run 3rd party, I’ll likely go for Bob Barr.
Posted by: CAH | May 14, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Above, when I said “…McCain would carry Wisconsin against Clinton, but not Wisconsin.” – please add “against Obama.” Now it’s a coherent thought! :-D
Posted by: CAH | May 14, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
I am from Australia and have no preference in relation to the parties. I do think that either McCain or Obama will be good presidents. I have watched the primaries and noticed how Clinton has changed her views with each State namely NAFTA, Columbia and these are different to the views she had when she was first lady. Is this not flip flopping. She has also blatantly focussed on her gender to gain the women votes including the whites. She apologises after the event but she has sown the seed of doubt similar to the Obama in Kenyan traditional dress. She is not to be trusted because if she is President she will forget her promises and near the end of term will then bluff the people. Get smart like Hillary and think like her to see her conniving ways. Blue collar workers are smart though in WV they might have thought Obama has the vote so let us give Hillary a little joy at the end.
Posted by: jdraper | May 14, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
The flag pin is an important issue for me. I like Clinton and McCain because they do wear flag pins, and by doing so, they show style. Red, white and blue bling. Bling is important to the eye of the voter because real issues are things that don’t really matter in a campaign. I know this, and you know this. Now on the other hand, flag pins show a candidate’s position on issues. It shows whether they are for a war or accept lobbyist money. So listen here Mr. Obama, if you want to win, bring out the bling, and you’ll get them votes.
Posted by: treble hook | May 15, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am
Barack Obama didnt even campaign in West Virginia as Clinton did.What would the winning margins will be like if he did campaign in the state for a few days.
Even then he got almost 100,000 votes by stopping by briefly.To say the result reflects weakness on BOs amongst rural whites is absurd and premature. Its has been shown in this election that the more BO campaigns and get to know people,he does much better.
My only criticism of Obama here is that he should have travelled more and campaigned in WVa than he did.In that respect,he will avoid “cherry picking” of states as he often againt earler in the process.
Posted by: kasa | May 16, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Obama is winning. Period. He’s been above the fray and I actually think that’s the only thing that has hurt him. Obama lost in W. Va, but didn’t really do lots of campaigning there. Here’s the deal, Dukakis won W. Va, and it did not help him. On the other hand, Missouri’s a swing state, Obama won it. Missouri has chosen correctly with the exception of once since like 1904 the actual president. Everywhere Obama is actually campaigning, shaking hands, kissing babies, etc., he closes the gap or wins. He’s been down 15-30 pts. in 90% of the states and has closed the gap to win it or lose by a slim margin like 5pts. Examples, down by 20 pts. in Missouri, wins it. Down by 20 pts. 2 weeks before voting in Texas, only loses by 4 pts. Down by 20 pts. in N. Mex. loses by 1 pt. Everyone his boots touch the ground, it’s Ms. Clinton who can’t close the deal. Everyone’s talking MI and FL. Well, Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot in MI, because he was trying to stay true to the agreement the DNC, he, and Ms. Clinton had excluding those states. He didn’t campaign in those states, but given his history if they do decide to seat MI and FL, it should be a 50/50 split given the fact that no one knows who would’ve one. He always closes the gap.(Because of DNC rules, Obama and his supporters were also disenfranchised) Ms. Clinton’s making a big deal about Florida, and it’s not going to any democrat anyway…it will go Republican, McCain won’t even waste time or money doing much campaigning there, it’s a given. Everyone’s acting like Florida’s the state to watch, because it was “close” last time. Reality is, it was not close, Bush walked away with Florida. Pennsylvania will go democrat. California, NY, etc. Obama will probably flip some other states. Ohio’s a toss up. The dynamics in Ohio have changed, meaning they have a democratic governor and some democratic seats. Bottom line, she’s losing. Can’t change math. 2 + 2 will always equal 4. Obama’s chances are great!
Obama 08!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Vegas | May 20, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm