By Ed O'Keefe

May 15, 2008 9:57am

Obama Takes Issue With Bush Foreign Policy Speech

ABC News’ Ed O’Keefe Reports: The Obama campaign is taking issue with a comment President Bush made while speaking to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel’s statehood.

"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," the President said to the country’s legislative body, "We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is –- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."

Watch video of Bush’s comments on terror HERE.

In a statement, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., shot across the bow: "It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 6Oth anniversary of Israel’s independence to launch a false political attack. It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel. Instead of tough talk and no action, we need to do what Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan did and use all elements of American power — including tough, principled, and direct diplomacy – to pressure countries like Iran and Syria. George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the President’s extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel."

ABC News’ White House troops point out that the President has made similar statements in the past and Bush did not specifically cite Obama by name, though he did reference Sen. William Borah’s immortal reaction upon hearing that Hitler had invaded Poland and begun World War II, something he has not highlighted in the past.

"(The President) has said similar things before," a White House official told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz. "But it is in reference to a number of people, think Carter, others who have engaged in this or suggested it."

White House spokesperson Dana Perino was asked if Bush’s line was a slam against Obama and she insisted, "It is not."

"I understand that when you are running for office sometimes you think the world revolves around you. That is not always true and it is not true in this case," Perino added, though the White House is keenly aware of how such statements might play during a heated political season and has steadfastly avoided commenting on the 2008 race.

Late Thursday that notion seemed to be confirmed.

"Did we know this could be construed as being about Obama? Yes, of course," a White House source told ABC News. "But was this about just Obama? No, it was about Pelosi, Carter, Biden, Obama, etc. When the line went in the speech, we made sure that it was the same as everything (Bush) has said in the past. This was not about just Obama."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Cali., did not take kindly to the remarks calling Bush’s statement "beneath the dignity of the office of the president" in her weekly press conference on Capitol Hill.

Pelosi alluded that presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., should distance himself from Bush’s assertions in Israel, repeatedly saying "any sensible person" would.

In an ABC News interview with the President in April, Bush told Raddatz, "I’ve said the president’s job is to solve these issues diplomatically first and foremost. But, of course options need to stay on the table."

Vice President Dick Cheney has been more direct in criticizing the 2008 Democratic candidates, although still not by name.

"The idea that we can walk away from Iraq is, I think, terribly damaging on its face, and to say that, ‘well that’s the only way we can get the Iraqis to take on responsibility,’ I don’t believe that’s the case," Cheney said in a March interview with ABC News.

Without addressing the Democratic candidates specifically, the vice president said those who want to pull out of Iraq are "seriously misguided," adding that the presidential candidates would be risking an attack on the homeland if U.S. forces withdrew, and arguing that terrorists would find safe havens in other countries.

Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., both have said they’d withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq if elected president. Sen. McCain has advocated a continued U.S. presence in Iraq until security and political situations improve.

When asked if he was talking about any candidate in particular, Cheney said, "I am talking about any candidate for high office who believes the solution for our problem in that part of the world is to walk away from the commitments that we’ve made in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere."

ABC News’ Ann Compton, Jon Garcia, Sunlen Miller, and Martha Raddatz contributed to this report.

User Comments

Right, because Bush’s policy of shoot now, talk later has worked beautifully. Btw, how are those House elections coming along, President?

Posted by: Ryno | May 15, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Obama scares the hell out of me. I listened to his speech in Michigan last night, and he cannot possibly expect to deliver what he is promising. He’d bankrupt this country. Of course, we’ll be destroyed by then anyway, so who cares? McCain is no conservative, but at least he will keep my family relatively safe at home, and that is what matters.

Posted by: Dave C | May 15, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

But Obama DID say he wanted to negotiate with terrorists. Launching an attack on Bush does not change that fact.

Posted by: Darryl | May 15, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

I love this theme that Obama will talk to our enemy. But yet he won’t go on Fox News. What a brave man.

Posted by: Jon | May 15, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

It seems now that all our leaders have to swear allegiance to a foreign country before they can have any legitimacy in the US. When are our leaders going to wake up to the fact that Israel’s interests are not = to US interests? Probably never.
Perhaps the solution is to throw them all out and let the president, congress, etc take permanent residence in the Knesset.

Posted by: Madrid | May 15, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Obama knows he blundered when saying he’d negotiate with Iran, as if it would make them like us or something. Message for Barack: Iran hates us. Force is the only thing they understand.

Posted by: Rick | May 15, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

What a mature way to deal with people who threaten you. Instead of speaking to them as peers, you point guns at them. Then you duck and scream when they point guns back at you. Foreign policy should not be conducted the same way as high school politics.

Posted by: Doug | May 15, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

By the way, how many of you Americans have been attacked at home since 9/11? Must be because the terrorist aren’t trying. Wake up you losers.

Posted by: Kevin | May 15, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

I voted for Bush twice and I am proud of it

Posted by: mary | May 15, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Talking is okay as a first resort. It just has to be backed up with some stones, clearly, which Obama does not possess.

Posted by: Schratboy | May 15, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Dave I’m not sure you have been paying attention. The country is bankrupt. Your boy has borrowed anouther 4 trillion dollars. I would rather go bankrupt giving health care to americans than giving cash and blood to our enemies.

Posted by: BKL | May 15, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Obama is so clueless it’s staggering!

Posted by: davenp35 | May 15, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

So when the President of the United States is giving a speech somewhere, he is actually speaking in code to Obama? I don’t which is more dangerous, Obama’s arrogance, or his paranoia.

Posted by: Jerry Johnson | May 15, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Carter tried to talk to Middle East Terrorist and it never got our hostages released. He even tried it recently talking to Hamas, maybe the Pres speech was directed at Both Obama and Carter? Either way Islamic terrorist have plainly said join Islam or Die and Die if you are a Jew so how is talking to them going to change their minds on that?

Posted by: col.smeag | May 15, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Scoreboard:
Magic number needed to win 2025
Obama’s state wins 32 lost 17, Delegate count 1890 +/-.
Clinton’s state wins 17 lost 32,
Delegate count 1713 +/-.

Posted by: Lookup | May 15, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Hey Jon,
Obama was on Fox News Sunday on April 27.
Thanks for joining us.

Posted by: OMG!WTF? | May 15, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

OTE: JOHN MCCAIN, the only sane vote for true Americans. A true war hero, patriot in the Oval Office.
Amen! justme2see

Posted by: mary | May 15, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

I like the comment from WH spokesperson, Perino: ” I know when you are running for office you think the whole world revolves around you……”. For some reason the old Carly Simon song comes to mind – “You’re So Vain”.

Posted by: Steve | May 15, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

How much foreign policy experience does Obama have? Oh yeah, ZERO! As a matter of fact, He hasn’t really done anything, ever. NOTHING. But he can give a good speech though, right? Wise up folks, you’re letting your hatred of Bush cloud your judgement.

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Yeah Tina, Bush is right. If we refuse to use dipolmacy, invade carelessly, squander our treasure on corrupt officials we place as head of foriegn governments and change our way of life, liberty and laws, then we’ll have defeated terrorism. Vote republican, vote more of the same.

Posted by: JR | May 15, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Even though I am a conservative Republican, Bush has no credibility to criticize anyone! He has devastated our country! Heaven help whoever is our next President. He or she must bring this country back together and clean up the horrendous mess that they will inherit.

Posted by: James | May 15, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

A vote for Obama is just plain stupid.
Obama stands for higher taxes, no guns, and abortion on demand, just to name three.
The crap he spewed about a mandatory retirement account matched by the government is un-frigin’ believable! Who’s going to pay for that crap?
Just look at the taxes he’ll be piling on with this nonsense!
Talk to Iran? What good has come of that? Thanks to Carter, it’s like talking to a wall.

Posted by: EJ Smith | May 15, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

There is undeniable evidence that Iran is killing American troops in Iraq. Iran was in complete control of the Beirut Lebanon terrorist uprising. They are funding and arming the two terrorist groups, as well as Syria, surrounding Israel. They are creating havoc in any way they can to become the regional power in the middle east. If they get a nuclear weapon, they will be 200 times harder to cotrol…… So Obama wants to pull out of the middle east immediately and create a void for Iran to fill —- not too bright Barack!!

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

OMG!WTF?
You know he only did that as a desperate attempt to get control of the situation after his racist pastor continued his racist rants. If not for that, he would not go near Fox News.

Posted by: Darryl | May 15, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

No solar energy development, drilling or nuclear plants results in wars, devaluation of dollar, high energy prices and disaster. None of these candidates has agreed to solve this problem, not even McCAin. None of them get it. 20 years of this policy and everybody can see and feel the results.

Posted by: Ballen | May 15, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

VOTE: JOHN MCCAIN, the only sane vote for true Americans. A true war hero, patriot in the Oval Office.
Amen! justme2see

Posted by: mary | May 15, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I voted for Bush twice before and would happily do so again without thinking.

Posted by: Tina Fresno | May 15, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Dave, Obama can’t bankrupt this country. George Bush already has. Our trillions of dollars in deficit is GWB’s fault. How can you equate bankrupting this country and keeping your family safe? That makes no sense. But, if GWB “alternate older brother” gets in office, at least your family would be safe…in a cage. Is that where you want to be? In a cage? We used to be able to travel this world freely as Americans. No longer thanks to your buddy GWB.

Posted by: George | May 15, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Having an Islamic background, Obama should know that appeasement approaches will only be viewed as weaknesses. Make no mistake about it, countries that are Islamic are not secular in nature, but religious. As an example here in the U.S. just look at what CAIR has done. The entire purpose of the Islamic political agenda is about eradicating Isreal and enforcing Islam on the rest of the world. Islam grew by the sword, and is still using it to further its goals. How far off the beaten path is any religion that not only espouses, but indoctrinates its younger generation into suicide? There are no radical muslims, nor are there any moderate muslims. There are only muslims who follow the dictates of their mullah.

Posted by: Dennis Dean | May 15, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Face it the truth hurts Barak…as the saying goes, Those that do not learn from history are destined to repeat it.
Barak wouldn’t be so defensive it he didn’t feel deep down that what President Bush said is true.

Posted by: Rolando | May 15, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Oh yes… let’s vote for McCain, the walking goiter. Someone his age should spend his time playing bingo and picking dried food off his bib, not running this country.

Posted by: Doug | May 15, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Obama sure is defensive. Bush didnt even say his name and he freaked out..must have a bit of guilty concious about this.

Posted by: greg | May 15, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Who listens to Bush or Cheney any way? Who cares what these failures have to say about any thing? McCain too!

Posted by: IndieVisible | May 15, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Jon…if you listen to Fox at all O’Reilly announced that Obama is going on as soon as the nominee is decided. He is waiting until either he or Hillary have the “nod”. At least he is respecting her and letting this run it’s course…

Posted by: cindyct | May 15, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Obama is a trip, anything said against anything he says is deflected to be “racist”, “politics of fear”, blah blah blah
November should be interesting, cause this guy really has not been vetted at all as of yet. Most Americans barely pay attention to the primaries. I fear that the whole Wright things and lack of hand over the heart stuff (google Obama & pledge) will do him harm in the general election. This is where Hillary would have been better for the General election. Most Americans want a president that hands down loves this country and will do anything to protect it.

Posted by: jon | May 15, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Obama HUSSEIN will destroy this country if he gets in!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

We have been “negotiating” with terrorists and their supporters for three decades. For our efforts, American interests have been attacked over 15 times since then, culminating in the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Bush changed the “tone” of the talk and we haven’t been hit since.
Obama forgets that Iran has steadily grown stronger and Democrats voice of opposition grows louder.

Posted by: Lew Waters | May 15, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Why won’t Obama be thoroughly interviewed about his relationship w/Rev Wrong?

Posted by: plainsm | May 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

I’ve decided as an American, the progressives are right – libs like Tina aren’t worth fighting for and she is deserving of sharia law. Cowards like her certainly isn’t worth the risk of losing one military man so I say bring them all on home.
Al Queda, your welcome mat awaits. And this time, don’t worry about retaliation. Tina wants to talk nice and she takes the blame for your anger.
Vote Obambi 2008! Women, one burka size fits all!

Posted by: Tex Taylor | May 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

“We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939″!!! Who does this lying piece of garbage think he is? His own grandfather was Hitler’s biggest financial supporter and his father and his ideals are right inline with Adolph Hitlers. George Bush, you are a menace to the free world and have caused more damage to the world than any terrorist could ever dream up.

Posted by: A True American | May 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Well, we have come full circle. What goes around, certainly does come around and George Bush is out there slinging his old lies again and trying to scare people. What the hell does he care. In less that 250 days he will be out of office and can give up his war time sacrifice and start playing golf again.
The fact that people actually fall for this crap is amazing. Of course he was taking a shot at Obama and anyone else who might think first before they invade a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.

Posted by: Keith | May 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Israel has negotiated with Iran for years, why shouldn’t we?

Posted by: Alex | May 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Earth to BO, the world doesn’t revolve around you, get the chip off your shoulder.

Posted by: mike johnsonw | May 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The scariest person is Hillary Clinton. She takes both sides — Bush and Obama’s. Then give her a minute to make up a story as to why she shouldn’t be blamed because it’s someone else’s fault because they misled her and she didn’t have the time to read the intelligence report that was presented to her because maybe her dog ate it. She’d be panicing, looking for Bill in all hours of the night, while he was sleeping with one of his girlfriends.
I’m just glad it’s not her.

Posted by: anyonebuthillary | May 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Earth to BO, the world doesn’t revolve around you, get the chip off your shoulder.

Posted by: mike johnsonw | May 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Robert,
Are you really going with that? That’s the best you can come up with? Seriously?

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Greg…I guess you didn’t hear the interview…Bush said some of the most ridiculous and insulting things. He insulted our troops, the people of this country and made himself look like a total fool…

Posted by: cindyct | May 15, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Ballen — you act as if the lack of drilling or nuclear plants is the administration’s fault — check out history — who passed the laws making it almost impossible to drill or create nuclear plants? The envirnmentalists pushed their Democratic congressmen to pass those laws.

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

I think the President is right on this one. History has proven that you cannot make deals with terrorists because they will not honor their promises. If Obama does not understand this, he is not qualified to be the Commander in Chief of the United States. We must vote for McCain for our own safety.

Posted by: Kevin | May 15, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Bush giving advice on diplomatic policy! HA, this has to be a joke.

Posted by: travis | May 15, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

The idea that we shouldnt talk to our enemies is juvenile. Thats the way we thought in 7th grade.

Posted by: adam russell | May 15, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Since when did talking to your enemies become a bad thing? Seriously, this foreign policy of Bush’s is a disaster and makes America look ridiculous. I am so ready for something new.
I voted for him twice, financially supported him twice. I can NOT support a continuation of his policies.
Bush – Not my President.

Posted by: Ryno | May 15, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Obama, you protest alittle quick there. Bush wasn’t talking about you…just those like Carter that think Hamas is a peaceful group.

Posted by: Dave | May 15, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Obama had just better get used to this type of stuff. This is, after all, the big league where real grown-ups play hardball. If he can’t stand the heat and is this paranoid already, then he should just get out of the kitchen. This is going to be such an enjoyable ride. Can’t wait for his total downfall. It will be well deserved and long overdue.

Posted by: Terry | May 15, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

BKL said:Dave I’m not sure you have been paying attention. The country is bankrupt. Your boy has borrowed anouther 4 trillion dollars. I would rather go bankrupt giving health care to americans than giving cash and blood to our enemies.
Some of us BKL believe that when America is attacked that we should actually fight back. Some of us actually believe America is worth fighting for.

Posted by: Stephen | May 15, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Yes,
How dare Bush remove a ruthless dictator, the Taliban, and put every terrorist on the planet on the run. What nerve he has?

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

“I love this theme that Obama will talk to our enemy. But yet he won’t go on Fox News. What a brave man.” Posted by: Jon | May 15, 2008 10:12:28 AM
______________
You realize he did go on Fox News, right?

Posted by: Dan | May 15, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Gee, both Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton promise to bring troops home. We’ll see what happens. Political talk is cheap and dirty, but if either is lucky enough to be elected, they will face the same options and choices on terrorism as President Bush. Let their actions and the repercussions that will surely follow tell the story of their sincerity and their “wisdom.”

Posted by: John Prime | May 15, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

“Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists”.
WHAT? Obama himself he would hold un-conditional talks with Iran’s President, the man who has said he would nuke Israel, drive the rest of the Jews into the ocean, and come after us next. Obama has declared he believes Iraq ought to invite the guy into Baghdad and allow Iran to have a part/say in the future of Iraq. Sounds like Bush is ‘spot-on’ regarding Obama, the man who accused our own troops of targeting and killing women and children in Afghanistan!

Posted by: Easyt65 | May 15, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

>>>>>>>>>
I love this theme that Obama will talk to our enemy. But yet he won’t go on Fox News. What a brave man.
Posted by: Jon
>>>>>>>>>
Which alternate reality are you living in Jon? Obama was on FoxNews a couple of weeks back with Chris Wallace.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

obamma is a foreign policy disaster waiting to happen.

Posted by: George M | May 15, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Obama’s mama’s melodrama becomes our nightmare.

Posted by: Don I. Muss | May 15, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Does Bush really not see that everyone outside of this country sees him as the total TOOL he is?

Posted by: e-ville genius | May 15, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Why isn’t the media reporting all the “offers” to Iran to solve the nuclear weapons issue? You all sound like Obama is the only one who could “negotiate”. We have agreed to BUILD them a nuclear power plant in exchange for some control over the enriching of the nuclear material. Iran could easily obtain what they CLAIM they want — but they really want a nuclear weapon.

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

I don’t care what party the next President comes from as long as he has a level of intelligence greater than a toad. Eight years of “leadership” from a retarded guy (that I regretfully voted for) has laid waste to this country’s coffers and respectability. Excluding Bush’s cronies, are any of us better off now than when this walking disaster came into office?

Posted by: Larry | May 15, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

>>>>>
Obama scares the hell out of me. I listened to his speech in Michigan last night, and he cannot possibly expect to deliver what he is promising. He’d bankrupt this country.
Posted by: Dave C
>>>>>>
Nobody can bankrupt this country like Bush did and McCain will continue to do!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Obama thought Bush was talking about him! HAHAHA. Obama clearly associated Bush’s comments with his own beliefs which means Obama inadvertently acknowledged that he is an appeaser. What a fool!

Posted by: McTex | May 15, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

George M: “obamma is a foreign policy disaster waiting to happen.”
lol… and George Bush’s foreign policy is peaches? I’m a lifelong Republican and I’m ready for something new.

Posted by: Ryno | May 15, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Obama is not the cure; he is the disease.

Posted by: fxmulder | May 15, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Mary said
“I voted for Bush twice before and would happily do so again without thinking.”
Were you thinking the first two times?

Posted by: Chuck | May 15, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Bush – not my President.
:(

Posted by: Ryno | May 15, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

John – bankrupt this country? You liberals love to use fear mongering to win an election especially in light that the last 2 quarters the economy has actually grown and unemployment has dropped – unlike the last 2 quarters of the Clinton administration.
I know you guys love power for power’s sake but you do realize that lying will not get you there?

Posted by: McTex | May 15, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Obama’s strategy of appeasing terrorists does not work. History has shown this over and over. This should scare people even more than him sitting in front of a racist anti-american congregation for 20 years.

Posted by: Nick Mann | May 15, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

The President is right. Obama and the Democrats on the left need a reality check. Anyone who thinks that if you only ask Iran politely, that they will come to the conclusion that Israel has a right to exist in peace is delusional. They are a country that sponsors terror. That makes them criminals. Criminals commit crimes because they are ignorant, bigoted or just don’t care. Expecting them to be rational is another form of ignorance. You need to understand the government of Iran hates Israel and the United States. They want to kill its citizens. To let them have a nuclear weapon would be the height of stupidity. If Obama can’t see that he is gambling with the lives of Israelis and Americans.

Posted by: Tom | May 15, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Bush contrasting himself from Barack Obama = Best thing that could happen for Barack Obama.

Posted by: Ryno | May 15, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I cannot believe the cruel, degrading and downright insulting things people are saying about Obama. He is trying to pull this country together, just as Hillary is, why so mean…we all have our opinion, but use some common sense and respect.

Posted by: cindyct | May 15, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

The 32% of America that approve’s of George Bush’s job will clearly be persuaded by his arguments against Barack Obama.

Posted by: Ryno | May 15, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

I’m not a fan of any of the three main candidates, but the only one who has it right is McCain. You can argue, and I’ll agree with you, that we shouldn’t have invaded Iraq in the first place, but now that we are there, you are just plain stupid if you think a sudden withdrawal will be the answer. This is not Vietnam. You are handing Iran the worlds second largest petroleum reserves if we cut and run now. Every 82 days in the U.S. the same amount of citizens die from car accidents as the total number of troops that have died for the entire Iraq war so far. So I’m tired of the intellectually lazy lefts ‘bring the troops home’ B.S. If anything we should get a couple of hundred thousand more troops over there, weed out the classroom general types running things in Iraq, listen to our troops on the ground, and quash this thing once and for all. So sayeth Biffula.

Posted by: biffula | May 15, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

cindyct,
Name ONE thing Obama has done to unite the country? ONE?

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

>>>>>>>>>
Which alternate reality are you living in Jon? Obama was on FoxNews a couple of weeks back with Chris Wallace.
Posted by John
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LOL yeah after Chris called him on stalling for months…..he even started an “Obama Watch” count the time that had elapsed since Obama originally promised to go on the show. LOL guess Obama was worried about feeling out of his element, knowing he might be asked some tough questions from a reported that wasn’t part of the ABC cheerleader squad.

Posted by: Ian | May 15, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Any criticism, veiled or obvious, of Obama by Bush is helpful.It could be worse. Bush could be endorsing him .

Posted by: eSPO | May 15, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

>>>>>>>>>>>
Dubya is a prime example of what happens when you put an inexperienced and unqualified candidate with an experienced and saavy Consultants/Media advisors
Its a recipe for disaster
Posted by: Jacob Ezekial
>>>>>>>>>>>
Did you mean Obama? Lets rephrase it a bit..
“Bush is a prime example of what happens when you put an inexperienced and unqualified president with an experienced and dominating bunch of ideologues with no touch with reality.
Its proved to be a recipe for disaster.
700 BILLION spent on a foolish war and Taxcuts for the rich!”
Amazing how ignorant people can be.. oh well, people like you reelected the clown we have now!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Who supports Obama?
- Those who believe in nothing will believe anything.

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Hey Rich5!!!!!!!!! If something is not working why do you keep doing the same thing.
80% of the population including REPUBLICAns think this economy is going to hell. You really thinks that Republicans have a chance this fall. you must be living in a parallel universe.
Maverick indeed.

Posted by: robert ga | May 15, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I have read everyone of these posts and it seems like America has nothing but stupid uneducated people posting on these sites. All of you need to find something better to do than this.

Posted by: Joel | May 15, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Why is Obama assuming this is about him? When I read Bush’s statements I figured he was referring to Jimmy Carter. I think Obama is gun shy after having been dragged in the mud for the last month (rightfully so) that he feels the entire world is against him.

Posted by: Philip | May 15, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Reading these comments only further cements the idea that Americans are selfish, manipulative, and uncaring.

Posted by: Sadly | May 15, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I wanted pro-life judges and I got 2 of them in Bush

Posted by: mary | May 15, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Cindyct,
What’s your evidence (besides him saying that he is, and your fond wishes that its true) for concluding that Obama is trying “to pull this country together?”

Posted by: LDC | May 15, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Remember HRC’s response about Iran’s use of nuclear weapons on Israel? She said that she’d respond with force (although I can’t believe that she would do that). BO’s response was the most telling: He said that it would be “inappropriate” for Iran to act like that. “Inappropriate”? That’s what you say when your kids misbehave? What would garner a strong response from BO? When he’s called a wimp, racist? But, not when it comes to defending the security of this nation or of our allies. This man is a empty suit inflated by the hot air of the media and the elitists of the party. In that case, he’s dangerous.

Posted by: Frustrated Voter | May 15, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

I thought it was a shot at Jimmy Carter, but when your running for president you try and make headlines anyway you can.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 15, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Shaun — Yeah — like Clinton-North Korea?

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Obama is not a strong leader, he has already said he would talk with and negotiate with America’s enemies….
A vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for a stronger and safer America.

Posted by: mistybelle64 | May 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Obama is a wimpy lightweight. It has taken him 20 years to stand up to the Rev. Wright. How then, can we expect him to stand up to rogue countries and terrorits?

Posted by: Jenn | May 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

But Obama DID say he wanted to negotiate with terrorists. Launching an attack on Bush does not change that fact.
*****************************************But you see this is what the liberals do when faced wioth unarguable truth. They start yelling, wave their arms about and change the subject.Pathetic, weak traitorous losers, the whole lot of them.

Posted by: JjV | May 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

The 67% that disapprove of George Bush might not be so moved by his scorning of Barack Obama.

Posted by: Ryno | May 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

#1 I would vote for Bush again and history should look kindly on him in 20 to 30 years, provided that strong and sound leadership will follow him up.
#2 Barry Obama is not that answer.
Look at the electoral map. The democrat part, with thier insistance on incorporating as many ideologies as possible, created thier own muddeled situation. THe majority of States Barry has won will not tilt to the democrats in Novemember. People will shift away from either candidate because of the option left in the democrat party. O’bama will not win one southern state that he has won. He will not win the western agricultural states, he’s going to have problems in the rust belt.
it goes to prove with what options we have on the table as Americans for president just how much of a power vacume President Bush is leaving.
that’s the biggest legacy to Bush.

Posted by: Brandyn | May 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

To the writer who said “Obama has shown the judgment needed to run this country. Gates agree. “We need to figure out…” Yes, Obama needs to “figure out” but not on my clock. He can figure “it” out when he gets more experience. He has never told me anything specific and is the absolute best at saying words that define no clear path. Vote for him and watch all hell break loose in the world. Think people. Is this your J.F.K of modern day? Is that why you support him–because you “hope” and “dream” that he’ll fix the USA? Keep-on dreaming, praying and spraying people, and maybe you’ll win the lottery too.

Posted by: Dan | May 15, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Maverick (Mccain) thinks we can bring our troops back in 2013. YOu have got to be kidding me. with all the problems we have back home (economy , health care, gas) you are still talking about spending all that money and time over there (don’t forget life).
This war is not a personal war we must ‘Quote win”, its foreign policy. Mccain it is not personal, it is just business. let the iraqis know that.
GO DEMS

Posted by: robert ga | May 15, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Good to see I’m not alone in thinking Bush was talking about Jimmy Carter with these comments.

Posted by: Brandon | May 15, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

This is why Obama will tank. He should have just kept silent. Appeasement will not work and Obama knows it. Now that he put his foot in his mouth.
Obama appears like a terrorist appeaser that will not play well in Peoria, godforbid if the discussion is followed by some terrorist attack we are looking at McCain (Bush 3) for President.
I still think Clinton is a better candidate than Obama to respond to Bush.

Posted by: Jay | May 15, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

dont be silly, so we are in agreement?

Posted by: mary | May 15, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

How long has it been now since GW and Darth have been irrelevant? Let’s see. How about 7 1/2 years give or take. The man is a absolute disgrace since nothing he says or does has ever, ever worked. In fact, everything he touches goes straight to h e l l !
You know it. I know it. And, it’s way past time we do away with him. Try something new. Geez, who knows? It might have a chance of working. Not a single thing Bush has done has even come close.
Go Obama!
Ellen

Posted by: Ellen | May 15, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

I find it disturbing when a President wades in to our domestic politics when speaking to a foreign assembly. Why is he telling the Israelis that Obama is not fit to be President of the United States? What is the purpose and what does he want the Israelis to do? All immigrate and vote for McCain?
A President in a foreign country should represent all Americans and not just Republicans.

Posted by: Jacob | May 15, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

For all the morons complaining about Bush spiking the price of gasoline, you need to purge your very small disk space of memory.
Gasoline was also less than $2.00 in November 2006. When you going to start pointing the fingers at San Fran Nan and Hairless Reid? Congress still controls the purse strings, doesn’t it?

Posted by: Tex Taylor | May 15, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Okay you folks are just downright comical. The trojan horse president? A serious issue with the man because of a lapel pin? Ha! Is this McCain’s base? A group of bigoted angry people who fear anything different from them?
Newsflash – the world is full of different people and if we don’t have a discourse of some sort going with various cultures then we’re nothing more than a schoolyard bully that everyone ends up hating and plotting against. By the way, those of you who drive big old gas hog SUVs and Trucks (some with American Flags posted on them like they’re some sort of super bowl ad) – your gas dollars are doing more to fund the Muslim way of life you all hate so much than you obviously choose to believe. Take your gun racks down and get a hybrid.

Posted by: IndyKat | May 15, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Promises made during a campaign are meant to be broken. This is true for every canidate. No one can forsee what any of the Presidential Canidates would do once elected into office. To bad the media has not made a “Truth O Meter” during their campaign speeches. Instead we are subjected to endless news talk shows with diverse, extreme, wacky and alien opinions. Makes a person want to Barf. Hello, is there anyone normal out there.

Posted by: Spiderman | May 15, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Sojournertruth – what makes you think that Obama is God’s annointed? As far as I know, God has annointed the Jews as His chosen to share His truth. There is nothing about Obama that is Godly. He claims to be a Christian, but none of his activities are Christ-like at all. Take a look at his so-called pastor who spews racism. Take a look at how Obama views Israel. We are known by the fruits we bear, not by the words and impressions we speak.

Posted by: Frustrated Voter | May 15, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Can any one of you Obama supporters name one thing your beloved candidate has done? Just one thing? Anything? I know he wrote a book but other that. . .anything?

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

There are 57 islamic states…maybe a slip of the tongue?

Posted by: mj | May 15, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

We dealing with people that only understand violence. Obama and friends are delusional to think talking with the maniacs will somehow work. Been there, done that., Japan, talks worked well right up to Pearl Harbor, Hitler, Holocaust, duh?

Posted by: Kathey | May 15, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Once again Bush has it right . Some people can’t even recognize evil and evildoer when their throats are being cut and children being killed.

Posted by: george white | May 15, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

I think it is pretty funny that someone would say Obama will bankrupt this country – as if we aren’t bankrupt already. Take a look around and read the paper. Our economic situation is grim and there is no expedient solution because for the last 40 years politicians from both sides of the aisle have been avoiding the real issues like the plague.
Vote for limited government. Republicans – Democrats – makes no difference. They both take our hard-earned money and squander it on political follies.

Posted by: Bob | May 15, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Little insecure Barack? Phony victimness on full display. Just tell your point of view and let voters decide. Why this phony feeling of having to talk about how “tough” you are by smearing those you disagree with? Let your lousy ideas speak for themselves.

Posted by: Ike | May 15, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

P.S. “President Bush is right. If Obama is elected, terrorist may use our commercial airplanes and fly them into our tall buildings and kill people. Vote republican!” Either the stupidity of this statement is astronomical. Or it’s sarcasm is brilliant. Terrorist DID fly planes into our tall building and kill people. And it was under Bush’s watch! Yeah he was right on top of things. Then he got reelected by running a campaign based on fear. The Conservative party is the FEAR party!

Posted by: FlamingLib | May 15, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

I guess Obama knows what he himself thinks and therefore he thought George was talking about him. Not sure how he will handle direct accusation of being terrorist sympathizer in the general election.

Posted by: esvida | May 15, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

BHO is an empty suit. The man has no acconplishments. State senator, two years US Senator and before that a Community Organizer? He’s never had a real job.
Clueless lightweight every time he opens his mouth it’s a joke.
“It’s better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak up and remove all doubt.”

Posted by: JackSheet | May 15, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Well I can see that the 28% of bush’s supporters are out in force today. Funny how over 80% of Americans believe this country is heading in the wrong direction. W sure has done a wonderful job of leading this country in 7 1/2 years. Why don’t you bush supporters go drink some more cool aid……you are getting too worked up and need to calm down ;-)

Posted by: Jack | May 15, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Obama is very green but Hillary still thinks she is going to win. Fight it out Hillary, it just makes you look that much worse!
Obama, the President (Bush) is allowed to show his support for democracy in the Middle East. There is nothing wrong with that.
Why are you showing your true colors so soon?
I take that back, that’s not fair but it IS a concern of mine. I am really not shure who’s side you are on!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Obama’s the one making a political statement here, not Bush. And Obama doesn’t know what the heck he’s talking about.
It’s BECAUSE of Israel’s refusal to engage the likes of Syria that they’re able to survive.
You can’t compare Cold War diplomacy w that of the Middle East. The Soviet Union was a different type of adversary. The folks who run Syria and Iran are dangerous kooks. Israel knows how to deal with them first-hand, and the US could learn a lesson from them.

Posted by: politicaljunkie | May 15, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Dave C
do you realize that McCain’s continueing aggresive foreign policy stance…will not only make us overwhelmingly less safe (as we have seen with the increase inrecruitment from the past 7 years) but IT will bankrupt the country.
Go read Obama’s policy papers…
Joe Klein said it best… no one reads policy papers…and that is the problem with this whole election.
If you all are concerned about the future of this country …you would go read them.
Obama’s are the ONLY ones that make us not only safer but more financially sound…and a smarter investment.
His economic policies are ground in economics…not fear or gaining votes…go read them.

Posted by: dl | May 15, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

I think most of us are inured to Bush’s war rhetoric by now. No matter how well we plan against an attack, our enemies can find a way. We are fighting the “war against terror” with soldiers and American blood instead of the ONLY way we can ever “win”. But since it is not “politically correct” to use the military technology we have, it won’t be done. Clinton couldn’t stop them. Bush couldn’t stop them. And Obama won’t be able to stop them.

Posted by: Rhys | May 15, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

What planet is Obama living on?
We were attacked 4 or 5 times under the Clinton administration and haven’t been attacked anywhere in the world since 9/11 and that qualifies as “failed to secure America” ???
I am feeling pretty secure with Bush calling the shots!

Posted by: JAMIE | May 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

I believe Barry Obama will do his best to protect all 57 states.

Posted by: jeelbeartoe | May 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Obama is both a fool and a hypocrite – like all Liberals. Welcome to the Obamination.

Posted by: Neo Politicus | May 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

We’ve already seen what Bush and Congress have done and frankly, it ain’t pretty…so who cares what Bush says or thinks about anything?

Posted by: x32792 | May 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

If I was a terrorist I would revel in these comments from Americans. We speak poorly about each other–full of hate and self image. If I was presedent I would talk to every enemy, “It is in your best interest tow work with America and prosper because if you harm us we will distroy you.” Bush said it and Obama/McCain will too!

Posted by: James | May 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

By and large, most bullies understand one thing only… an ###-kicking. Talking to religious psychopaths is the sign of a severe mental deficiency.

Posted by: Obongo | May 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

I don’t agree with everything that he has implemented but Bush is absolutely right. These regimes are ones you can’t appease with talk as it is apparent with they way they are sending thugs over the border into Iraq to disrupt the way of life,including the murdering of our troops who are trying to bring normalcy to the Iraqi people. Talk is cheap with these dictators who spew rhetoric on a daily basis. They unfortunately learn by action.

Posted by: CMG | May 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

I love selective history….it’s easy to cite Chamberlain (because that’s what gets done on talk radio),
But…
Anyone care to remember the ‘blank check’ provided by Kaiser Wilhelm and Germany to their ‘endangered’ ally Austria-Hungary? By giving them complete support regardless of what Austria did, it helped plunge Europe into World War One. Unqualified support of Israel at the expense of balanced, nuanced diplomacy could cause a war worse thing than ‘just’ another Great War.
…then again, I said ‘nuanced’–not a term usually applied to fundamentalists whether on the far left or right of the political spectrum

Posted by: jim | May 15, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

So ok? We think that Bush made these statements with no references? If Barack had not made these statements, Bush would not have made his. So isn;t it fear for Barack to imply that he was referring to him. You people are so blind you won;t see it even if God himself stood before you. What is wrong with talking to your enemies? It is no wonder that we are in deep s**t right now. People open your minds… this is the 21st century.

Posted by: Angel | May 15, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Bush doesn’t have an original thought in his head. Nothing but simplistic and reductionistic thinking of us against them and decades old propaganda and revisionism.
Speaking of history, Germany had no interest in starting a world war and Russia, our ally, was quite busy taking over the Baltics, Finland and western Poland but Germany is evil and Russia good. Go figure.

Posted by: Keith | May 15, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

“I love it when libs blame Bush for $4.00 gasoline, hurricanes, terrorists, and the national debt.”
Well if you can credit him with saving us from the terrorists, then we can attack him for all the bad things that have gone wrong.
“To Paul: You certainly know how to twist facts to avoid assigning blame where it should rightfully go – democrats.”
4500 dead americans in Iraq is not twisting the facts. That is directly the cause of a republican president and a republican controlled congress. Why don’t you show me some facts suggesting that democrats are responsible for the housing crisis or the trillions we’re spending on war? And copy-pastes from the No-Spin Zone don’t count.
Have you forgotten how the republicans voted against healthcare programs for children? Saying they were too expensive… even though a year of that program would have cost the same as a month in Iraq. Republicans don’t care about you or your families, which is why they vote against social programs and spend all your money dropping bombs on civilians on the other side of the globe.

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Obama is a fraud created by the media on the idea of false hope….. “HOPE = DOPE”

Posted by: Jay | May 15, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Something is very wrong if I am starting to agree with George W.
Even though I am a Democrat, I am concerned that Obama is dangerously naive — which puts our national security at risk.
Terrorists do not want a dialogue. They only want more ammunition to kill us. Our views are too different to find any sort of mutual respect.

Posted by: M. Santos | May 15, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

I agree with J.R. comments that President Bush’s security policy has worked beautifully.
ZERO, yes ZERO attacks on US soil since our heroic President had the courage to stand-up, say enough is enough and engage in a proactive protect Americans policy against terrorists. Diplomacy, delivering democracy to Iraq and Afghanistan are remarkable achievements and provide us (all US Citizens) two strong allies in the Middle East. My family and I support and thank you Mr. President!!

Posted by: Dave | May 15, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

cramos,
That is why Jewish support for Obama may go below 50%. Even Kerry got 85% Mccain has a good shot at taking NJ, NY, Fl, PA with the mass defections non-black, non-ultra liberal white Democrat base.

Posted by: geevill | May 15, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Dave C – Your family is not safe with open borders, a ransacked treasury, gas prices going higher, job loss, a dumbed down and ineffective education system, and 2 wars. It is wiser to abandon our efforts in Iraq and leave them to form their own government than abandon our troops in Afghanastan and the future of America. 50 billion a week buys a lot of change! F.E.A.R. false evidence appearing real – it’s what Bush sells best. It is not going to be the “end of the world” if Obama becomes president – and being a liberal does not make one a Nazi! Have a nice cup of tea and take a deep breath – Bush’s color coded fear meter and 2 trillion dollar war didn’t help any of us feel safer either!

Posted by: white mountain | May 15, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Obama has had 3 whole years in the senate, that’s almost as many years as he spent in Muslim schools in Indonesia growing up during his formative years. It’s time he was the President.

Posted by: Gumball Machine | May 15, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

The Brits had their ‘Hundred Years War’ so why can’t Americans have their own? Vote for McCain and we get one too. The USA has been in Iraq a year longer than it took to defeat the Japanese Empire and help in the defeat of the German Reich. Only 95 more years to defeat Rumsfeld’s ‘couple thousand criminals and malcontents’.
Let’s see 95 more yearsat 160 billion a year…adjusted for inflation…

Posted by: Brett | May 15, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

If talking is appeasement, I assume that, as Israel is the aggressor, Bush is saying that the Palestinians should not talk to the Israelis. By the way, tell me one instance in which Iran has threatened us. Even if they did, they do not have the military capability to attack us. What is the problem. So they call us names, we call them names, let’s stop the name calling and discuss our differences. What in the Hell is wrong with that ? We have an army on their border. warships off their coast, Of course they are concerned.

Posted by: Checkmoot | May 15, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

i find it a little disturbing how all obama supporters think that obama will just pull the plug on the war in iraq..there is no way in hell he will just pull the troops out. that would be the worst thing we could do for the country. then EVERYONE in the world will hate us for destroying that country and leaving it in ruins.. no presidential candidate is going to just pull the plug on the war. Obama is all talk…Ill be voting Mccain in November if Obama is running against him

Posted by: ryan | May 15, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Obama isn’t curious george…he’s paranoid george….those ears keep getting bigger and bigger…pin them back boy!

Posted by: carolinanc | May 15, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Some really dumb comments…
do you all know that Gates disagrees with president Bush and McCain on this?
Did you know that quietly there is an internal struggle within the administration because they have made us less safe.
and for those who reference the past 7 years as working because we haven’t had a terrorist attack… do you know how al quaeda has multiplied in those years…and how long they take when planning an attack.
Bush has made us less safe…anyone who thinks otherwise is just a fearful protectionist who doesn’t see this war took everyone’s eye off the ball…and has made things worse for our kids.

Posted by: dl | May 15, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

“Could some of the smart democrats point out where there have been successes in talking with aggressors to get them to stop without using the threat of military action?”
- Nixon going to China.
- Reagan having recurring meetings with Gorbachev.
- Ike negotiating the diplomatic end to the Sino-US war (which many still think was the “Korean” war.)

Posted by: Tecumseh | May 15, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Some people are absolutely amazing! You Bush supporters blindly follow this idiot and believe every word that comes out of his mouth. This whole ‘War on Terrorism’ was started from events that happened on 9/11, and our government has fed us this manufactured story that anyone with a brain can see right through. How about that 16 foot wide hole in the pentagon that we are supposed to believe came from a passenger plane or how about that wtc building #7 that just ‘collapsed’ later in the afternoon but was reported by the BBC BEFORE it happened? Come on people! You cannot possibly be that naive, can you? Until THOSE questions are addressed, we cannot justify what we are doing over in Iraq!!! WAKE UP!!

Posted by: ba | May 15, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Bush is the biggest moron ever produced by the USA. Anyone giving him any credibility after all his lies is a joke.

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

To Joseph. You are named after one of the great people in the Bible, and if you believe there was no Holocaust, then those planes flying into the towers were optical illusuions? And your last name must rhyme with Himmler. Correct?

Posted by: fxmulder | May 15, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

One thing this board shows… Republicans definitely seem to have more time on their hands. Trying to counteract the “liberal media” by posting on blogs, are you? You all, and all of your “opinions”, full of hate and above all, FEAR, gave us the worst President in U.S. history. Unfortunately for you, voters are finally showing signs they have learned something from this mess. President Obama. Get used to it boys.

Posted by: Andrew | May 15, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

9-11 was the worst attack on US soil and it happened under Bush’s watch. You Bush butt kissing apologists make me sick! In your warped minds, you accept 9-11 as somehow acceptable because we have not been attacked again.

Posted by: MaxiDial | May 15, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Any candidate from any party would get the Jewish vote if they promised 60 more years of generous financial and military aid to Israel.
To understand Business As Usual, just follow the money.

Posted by: x32792 | May 15, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Bush is exactly what happens when you vote for someone on the basis of their last name…and just enough experience to say they know something …anything about government…
and McCain agrees with this guy.

Posted by: dl | May 15, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Paranoia …big destroya!

Posted by: Jack | May 15, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Dave C:
It is your RESPONSIBILITY as a man to keep your own family safe—-and not Obama or McCain….
You sound very weak talking about Obama “scaring you.” What kind of comfort does that provide to your family if you are scared by the senator? You should stand up and be the head of your family….not Obama….He’s running for president and will live in the White House and not your house…..

Posted by: Man Up!!! | May 15, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Why is Obama flinching?
Is he playing the “victim” card, again?

Posted by: RSL | May 15, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Obama is the first INTELLIGENT, SANE choice we’ve had for the Presidency for years. After almost 8 years of Bush & Cronies bankrupting our economy and making $$$ from a war that has cost America WAYYYYY too many sons and daughters, and cost Iraq even more, it’s time for REAL CHANGE. THANKFULLY that change will be in time. President Obama will save what Bush has nearly destroyed… AMERICA. Once America is back in the hands of Americans with BRAINS and a SOUL, instead of Big Business and the Owned Media, you’ll be thankful. Those of you actually capable of reading (unlike Bush) could learn a lot from Sirota’s ‘Hostile Takeover’. But you won’t read it, you won’t put out the effort to discover the truth.

Posted by: ByTheSea | May 15, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

To the person who keeps on writing about airplanes and buildings….you think 9/11 is a joke? You are an idiot!!!!!
Do not blame that on BUSH….you can thank Jimmy Carter for that he is the man responsible for unleashing international Jihad on the planet and turning over IRAN to Muslim fanatics…..
THIS IS WHAT HAPPEND THE FIRST TIME WE ELECTED AN INEXPERIENCED PRESIDENT!
THE SECOND TIME WAS BUSH, THAT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF

Posted by: cramos | May 15, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Darryl
did you know that gates agrees with Obama on talking to Iran?…so is Gates more naive too? You know the guy who is on the ground while Bush talks about missing his golf games out of respect for the soldiers.

Posted by: dl | May 15, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

This guy Obama is the most arrogant person I’ve ever heard, and I’ve heard plenty.
If Hillary doesn’t win, and we all she would have if Michigan and Florida were counted, then my vote is for McCain.

Posted by: Chris, NYC | May 15, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

This democrat will never vote for a guy like obama..supporting a racist preacher. talking down to poor working class people in America..He will be poison for this country. he makes empty promises and says he tries to steer away from the “old dirty politics of dc” but then does and says the same things everyone else is saying..this man is a joke

Posted by: ryan | May 15, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Republicans will be running on their record in November. A 35 year rise to power and absolute power for 6 of the last 8. Look at all the good they’ve accomplished.

Posted by: CaptnNed | May 15, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

swibbie if you think you are more safe than 8 years ago…you have not been paying attention.
Bush gave the terrorists a stronger argument, more recruits and more countries and areas to spread to while we were all stuck in Iraq.

Posted by: dl | May 15, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

When a Terrorist State or group knows that you will negotiate with them to make them stop terrorizing, they will increase attacks to make you give more. History proves this. Wake up Amoronicans!

Posted by: ImA | May 15, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Obama stands for nothing. he’s just trying to bluff his way into the white house and a lot of people are being fooled, there are a lot of foolish people in the united states evidently. so he’s gonna be as stupid as Jimmy Carter. other countrie’s talk with weapon’s. I hope Obama has his big gun’s ready.. I dont think Obama is a leader he’s a follower. he will do whatever those goons that are endorcing like Kennedy, Kerry, Richardson tell him to do. and i think they all know Obama is a loser, they just want a piece of Obama’s pie.. Kerry, Richardson ,Edwards run for president and that dont say to much about the company Obama keeps, and some people are just fed up with the Kennedy’s.. Gee dont Obama have at least one winner backing him? I’m voteing John McCain..

Posted by: Jean | May 15, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Who’s side is Obama on???!!!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

ABC reporter pointed out that Bush had said these things before. MSNBC reporter claimed that Obama did not favor talks without preconditions; he conflated preconditions and preparations, as Obama has sometimes hinted as he tried to back down from his statement at a debate. An Obama representative immediately said the opposite: that Bush was confusing preconditions with preparations, thus distinguishing between them as the MSNBC reporter implicitly claimed Obama was not doing. I guess the MSNBC reporter didn’t get the memo; he spoke too soon after the Bush speech, before he could advert to what the Obama representative was saying.

Posted by: Richard L.A. Schaefer | May 15, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

People have stopped listening to bush a long time ago, I am an Obama supporter but it doesnt matter to me now on who gets the nomination,as long as Bush goes away.He acts as if resorting to war is always the answer.He was wrong about Iraq and he still act as if he’s an expert at diplomacy.The only deplomacy he knows is the one that involves spilling more blood

Posted by: Laron | May 15, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Senator William Borah, to whom Bush so pejoratively referred as an appeaser to Hilter… He was a REPUBLICAN.

Posted by: Kyle | May 15, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Bush is the weakest president USA has ever had. USA was attacked on 9-11-2002 under his watch. I we Americans need to open our eys Bush never kept us safe he has ruined the country in any way possible.

Posted by: Momo | May 15, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

God help us from this Obama Jerk-maybe he should of listened more carefully what his racist pastor was saying in church and not what the President was saying in Israel – the truth always hurts take off that American Flag Obama we know you and your wife hate it– You will never win that Great Office thats reserved for Americans

Posted by: joeyusa | May 15, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

National security is the most important issue in most people’s mind! We have had NO attack in US soil for the past 8 years for a reason! Terrorists do not want us to live ! They do not like our way of life, we are “INFIDEL” to them. The only thing they know about is gun power! It’s either they live or we live! Talking to those extremists can do nothing to secure our homeland except boosting their claim to their cause! This has always been what Obama’s way of diplomacy — direct talk to our enemies — which is fatal to our country!!! Obama has NO ClUE!

Posted by: Amy A. North Carolina | May 15, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

>HE’S VISITED 57 STATES? DO THEY INCLUDE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN?
Yep, he has been to FL and MI. He has been to israel 7 times which makes for a total of 57 ;-)!

Posted by: geezer | May 15, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

>HE’S VISITED 57 STATES? DO THEY INCLUDE FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN?
Yep, he has been to FL and MI. He has been to israel 7 times which makes for a total of 57 ;-)!

Posted by: geezer | May 15, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Talking only works if you have parity between the parties. Attitude is also important. When one side is so paranoid that they don’t pay attention to offers from the otherside and the otherside is closed minded because the other side won’t take advice you have no success.
War is the final option. We are in that mode with the terrorists not with the Govt. of Iraq. The Dems strategy is to force a myth on the public so that Republicans can’t win an election. The jig is up, the people are on to the liberals’ attempt to sabatoge our foreign policy. Hence, a strenth for McCain, not a weakness.

Posted by: goplad | May 15, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

It’s simple. If you vote for the Democrat party, a terrorist will kill you. Or something like that. Jeebus, Bush is annoying.

Posted by: Jake | May 15, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

It’s unbelieveable how incredibly stupid Obama is. Thank God he’ll never
be our President. GLW Erie, Pa.

Posted by: George L. Wands | May 15, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

OK……… I give! Bush is a fool, and it is time to turn the page. The economy is in the tank and gas is at $4.00 / gal. But wait…….. Has Obama really taken a stand and said what he would do? While everyone is throwing stones at GW, let’s count all the attacks we have had on US soil. I am sure Obama and Pelosi are all excited about prospects in Nov. I sure hope they get more do than they have since she became speaker.
There is plenty of blame to go around. Maybe we should start listening to each other instead of looking to see what letter is behind their last name.

Posted by: Daniel Fischer | May 15, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

How can Obama take issue with the truth? Obama has repeatedly said he’d sell out to Iran, Hamas, Venezuala, and any other nation that murders it’s own citizens just so they can later murder ours. Obama’s failure to understand this, coupled with his thinking there are 58-60 states and an The-Onion-esque grasp of history makes me wonder how he got into the Senate.
Maybe he’s not the messiah after all.

Posted by: Chad | May 15, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Everything said is political in an election year. I don’t think Obama should try to defend himself. He should try to defend his position. Whether the remark was intended as a slam on him or not, it is only a slam on a position on one issue. If Obama feels strongly that the position on the issue should be defended, he should do so – hopefully without slamming the President. I know it won’t happen, but I hope this election is directed toward discussing – however heatedly – issues and not on hating one candidate or the other as is often the case – especially in these posts. I don’t dislike Obama, Hillary, or anyone that disagrees with my beliefs – political, religious, or otherwise. I will support the winner in November and call him my President – and I will give him the respect that office grants. If I did it for President Clinton, I can do it for anyone.

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Obama wants to be President???!!!
How old is he?

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Man Up!! —– I will protect my own family unless Obama becomes President (God forbid!) and tries to take away our 2nd Amendment right to bear arms!

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

As to Bush’s speech in Israel, Barack always shows his narcissim and grandiosity by assuming that Bush was referring to him. If the shoe fits buddy wear it. And this guy wants to not to appear elitist. Like Bill Clinton well said “give me a break?”

Posted by: Angela | May 15, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Obama thinks everything is about him lol

Posted by: steve l reid | May 15, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Very poor discourse here.
Is it actually clear to you that the U.S. has basically spent over 21 thousand dollars per Iraqi on this war? Do you think it possible that we could have reached a better result with that kind of money? Does it not seem that McCain will just continue this until at least 2013, as he just announced (assuming, of course, that everything from here on goes swimmingly). Do you have any impression about what impact this debt will have on the quality of life of those aging and the next generation(s).

Posted by: Dek | May 15, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Obama wants to set us back 1600 years.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Bushes speech was the day after the President of Iran said Israel is doomed. You don;t talk to leader like this. You ostracize them becuase talking with them gives them legitimacy and the world stage to spread their views and to rally supporters. Iran needs to learn their extreme views are not welcome nor mainstream. Obama would weaken the US by talking with them and he is showing is naivete. You can say what you want about Bush, but we have not had an attack on the US since 2001. I fear an Obama presidency.And Obama supporters are blind to his faults.

Posted by: john s | May 15, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

How do you think you’re going to talk to terrorists? Do you think there’s some magical thing to say to keep them from killing innocent people? They (like Iran) would welcome long drawn out dialog to give them more time to develop nukes–all the time they would be laughing at the USA. We can not fix what has been broken for thousands of years; just do the best we can to give our children and grand children a chance to have a good life.
Okay, so it’s our economic greed you say–fix that and they’ll like us, right? Are you driving a car? Are you shopping for gadgets at the lowest possible price? Guess what: you’re guilty too!

Posted by: Dan | May 15, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

I heard somewhat similar talks and feelings about JFK, thats as a Catholic, never elected before, he was part of the papist movement, the Pope was in protestant circles the anti Christ, that america need an older experienced leader, JFK was too young.
This would be too radical, and he turned out quite more conservative than some Republican conservatives today.
Right now, looking at Bush having outspent every democrat in recorded history, admitting mission not accomplishd after x thousand of our boys killed, pushing an egregious immigration bill along with Reid, Mcaine and Kennedy and Clinton makes one wonder just who’s word is worth anything.
So I do not buy any of the current slogans and soundbytes that come from Bush or Mcaine. Its their turn to get in the barrel with the hole on the side.
The thing about true Republican Elephants is WE Really never forget!

Posted by: Manny | May 15, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Obama is so green, he was born yesterday.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

How can you “talk” to people whose only goal is to KILL YOU!

Posted by: Hugh H Hogue | May 15, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Obama is definitely showing his weakness. This has only begun considering Obama’s previous comments on Iran and that fact that one of Obama advisors was having direct talks to Hamas. Obama and his far left fanatics seem to be in their own reality.

Posted by: _Christopher | May 15, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I love how Obama will go and negotiate with these homicidal terrorists bent on destroying our way of life… he will talk to them… but he wont go on Fox News, because they are “biased”

Posted by: SanJoseJay | May 15, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Wait and see — by next spring Iran wil have all their pawns in place and will start lobbing missles into Israel. I just hope to God we have a man in office who makes the right decisions. Thats NOT Obama, he will just want to sit down and talk about it!

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Barak sounds a little defensive doesn’t he?….possibly a little paranoid?

Posted by: Matt | May 15, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Barak sounds a little defensive doesn’t he?….possibly a little paranoid?

Posted by: Matt | May 15, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Obama is only capable of good, just ask the mainstream media.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

I’m also suprised half of you god fearing terrorist fearing people can work a computer shouldn’t you be hiding and hating from under your bed, praying W. will come save ya?

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

I agree, Obama is just a piece of trash!
I am Democrat but will joint anyone to defeat Obama in the fall if Hillary is not a nominee.

Posted by: Texan | May 15, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Obama is paranoid from (before) the start!!!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Cry baby Obama. Why is every body picking on me,boo-hoo. What a jerk. He should be persident of the cry baby club.
Go Hillary-08

Posted by: slokipoki | May 15, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Dek —- Dont fool yourself… even if Obama says he will get out of Iraq asap…we will have a military presence in Iraq for DECADES to come (just like S Korea, Germany, etc). At least McCain is HONEST when he says we will be there a while longer, even though he is misquoted about it.

Posted by: Mark | May 15, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

I am so sick of America’s policy so stupidly always supporing Israel! What has Israel ever done for the US? Nothing! The jewish lobbying group in this country is too powerful and their influence is only hurting America. It says something when America is Israel’s only friend.

Posted by: Lisa Hampton | May 15, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Sounds to me like President Bush described a garmet and Barak Obama claimed it as the coat out of his closet. A good politician would have side stepped this issue without sounding defensive and stupid.

Posted by: Dave Singleton | May 15, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

In which of the 57 states would Obama chat the terrorist states?
Would he bring his pal Bill Ayres along to translate?

Posted by: Johnny | May 15, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

dl, your argument is a bunch of emotional nonsense. There is absolutely NO evidence that “Bush gave the terrorists a stronger argument, more recruits and more countries and areas to spread to while we were all stuck in Iraq”.
So please, back up your claim. How many more Al Qaeda recruits are there now than there were in 2001?? How many??
How many more countries is Al Qaeda in than they were in 2001?? How many??
If you cannot answer these specific questions, please take off the tin foil hat and start thinking for yourself. The mother ship has failed you completeley.

Posted by: Swibbie | May 15, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Quote of the Day……..’My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the
history of the world. I hope you’ll join with me as we try to change it.’
– Barack Obama
Posted by: TG | May 15, 2008 11:25:20 AM
TG
You ought to send this to Rush Limbaugh and Shawn Hannity.
GREAT QUOTE by the Great Pretender.

Posted by: Concerned | May 15, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Last I remember Bill was bombing terrorist training camps in afganistan and the repubs we’re accusing him of just covering up an affair. They controlled congress and pressured Bill to stop targeting al queda in Afganistan. Then good ol W took like the first 9 months of his presidency off. I’m not saying W helped the terrorist I’m saying his just didn’t do much to stop them.

Posted by: joe | May 15, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Thank God GWB has never tried talking to any of our enemies – he would have had us in a world war for sure! He should speak for himself when he says talking would not help – from him, no it would not. He has a way of rubbing everyone the wrong way with his tough cowboy talk, sideways sneer, and smart aleck swagger. Just watching him would make anyone want to start a war with us. He is like the ever-hated smart-aleck schoolyard bully. However,there have been leaders of ours who were very successful in their diplomacy, Kennedy, Reagan, Nixon, and I’m sure many more that we know nothing about. If GWB were president during our troubles with Russia, we would still be fighting a war with the Russians. The right kind of diplomacy can go a long way in this world. Dipolomacy and finesse is something GWB does not have and never will have. There is not a diplomatic bone in his body, just smart-aleck, name calling rhetoric. I hope he stays away from other leaders – we don’t need him starting another war before he leaves office – two are enough.

Posted by: Ron | May 15, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

The only way to negotiate with a terrorist is from a position of strength. Talking and negotiating in a Muslim country to them is a sign of weakness. They ONLY understand brute force. You kill enough of them and they will get the point. But, have to destroy their perverted education system of Madrassas also.

Posted by: Retired Army LTC | May 15, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

I’m tired of hearing how if we defend ourselves we recruit new terrorists. 911 recruited thousands of new American soldiers and continues to do so. Every time we see these muslim idiots burn an American flag or chant “Death to America” you can bet they are creating a few more SEALS, a few more Delta Force, a few more Airborn and a few more CIA operatives, so keep it up! You leftists think you’re oh so very brave and couragous because you criticize the USA. Try criticizing a muslim country while your on their soil and see what happens. You’re a bunch of pansies.

Posted by: Chris | May 15, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

My grandmother said it better…”I’d talk to the Devil if it meant it would save the life of one of my children.” It takes courage to stand up for your convictions and face one on one with someone who threatens you harm. It takes a coward to push the crowd forward and remain encircled by bodyguards while yelling “we’ve got to protect ourselves from those evil doers”

Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 15, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Let get some education from the other side. The only reason these extremist attack the west is!!! the call use infidels/caferi (meaning unbelievers). they think we have come to corrupt their society. plain and simple.

Posted by: robert ga | May 15, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Joseph I am not able to comprehend your beliefs.
The Holocaust is not a myth, it is a fact.
General Eisenhower understood that many people would be unable to comprehend the full scope of this horror. He also understood that any human deeds that were so utterly evil might eventually be challenged or even denied as being literally unbelievable. For these reasons he ordered that all the civilian news media and military combat camera units be required to visit the camps and record their observations in print, pictures and film. As he explained to General Marshall, “I made the visit deliberately, in order to be in a position to give first-hand evidence of these things if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these allegations merely to ‘propaganda.’”
We now return to our regularly scheduled programming of Obama taunting.

Posted by: JackSheet | May 15, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Hey Joe,
Clinton bombed an Aspirin factory! Not only was it the wrong target, it destroyed 75% of the country’s aspirin supply. Do some research junior!

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Hi
Though i support hillary , i am against withdrawing troops from Iraq.
Obama is too left but i am better off with Maccain.
Withdraw troops-
This is for obama-
Hay America promised the peace for afganistan and iraq not georg bush or Cheney. It is our duty to make sure they are protected . If we withdraw from iraq , the terrorist will go after the people that we sworn to protect .
Pathetic . I am democrat and this time for Maccain.

Posted by: sumedha | May 15, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

I assume everyone who is so anti-Obama are voting for Mccain. If the idea of 4 more years of a Bush clone suits your needs than go for it. Enjoy living in your tent.

Posted by: dave | May 15, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

I have been disapointed with many of Bush’s decisions as president. But he is absolutely correct when he says that talking to terrorists and rogue nations is foolishness.
An Obama presidency is the scariest thing I can think of. I’m not thrilled with John McCain, but he will be strong on foreign policy. Unfortunately, we may get Obama and then we’ll be able to experience the profoundly negative results of weak foreign policy.
Considering the blind devotion to Senator Obama, maybe we are due for a lesson.

Posted by: Sonya B. | May 15, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Obama sounds a little insecure. It’s certainly understandable if that America hating loud mouth was the best he could do for a wife.

Posted by: Jason | May 15, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Bush is the last person on the face of the earth to lecture anybody about diplomacy. After we rightly went into Afghanistan to take care of the Taliban, it has been one misstep after another, culminating with our war on Iraq, which will go down as the biggest blunder ever in American foreign policy. If Bush REALLY meant what he said about going after terrorists, why in the hell didn’t he go after Hamas and Hezbollah? We know the answer: because it would have been a political and international disaster. He thought Iraq was a safer bet than these terrorist groups or Iran. There’s not an intellectually honest bone in his, Cheney’s, or Rumsfeld’s body. I’ll be SO glad to see Bush and his cronies ride off into the sunset.

Posted by: Billy | May 15, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Anybody out there as sick of our low IQ President and his enablers as I am?

Posted by: Bill in NC | May 15, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Bush policies have strengthened Al Qaeda. What an idiot!

Posted by: Keith | May 15, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Hillary still trying to win with no support, no money, no direction, no wisdom, no understanding, no counsel, no support, did I say, “no money”, no knowledge and no fear of God!
Yeah, keep up the fight Hillary, show them what you are made of! What are you made of??? Certainly not everything nice!
…and what are you fighting for? The more you fight on the worse it makes you look…
So keep on fighing!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

You people are small-minded and naive. After what George Bush has done the last 8 years, he has no credibility in saying talking to the enemy is the wrong thing to do. Look what ignoring them has done. Republicans like to admire Reagan so much, but didn’t he eventually become very good friends with a sworn enemy? A guy named Gorbachev? You people like to cherry pick every part of an argument that strengthens your stance. Bush squandered Billions of dollars in surplus, and now look at the deficit. Yeah blame Democrats all you want, but this is THE WORST ADMINISTRATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY! Refute that if you can.

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

funny – I wonder if Cheney wrote that history report for Bush to site?? Bush has no standing to talk about how to run foreign policy – its like Chemey teaching hunter safety

Posted by: dave | May 15, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Nuke Mecca!
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure.

Posted by: Hap Arnold | May 15, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Hillary, the more you fight on, the worse it makes you look.
So keep on fighting!

Posted by: Jim | May 15, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Obama is such a naieve child. Is this the best the Liberals could come up with for a candidate? My god..no wonder liberalism carries a hated stygmatism..you guys are absolute idiots…
maybe we will get lucky and Obama will be in a debilitating accident before the election takes place…God help us all if this mental infant becomes president.

Posted by: Ed | May 15, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

If I read some of these remarks I can not imagine they come from civilized people. The remarks were, of COURSE directed to Obama but besides that I want you to know that Bush is not respected in any of the countries I have lived in (European mostly).The attacks of 9/11 have, although strongly disapproved, not come as a surprised. America needs to come of the Island they are living on quickly. For the Intelligent ones amongst you that point their finger at history… (I can see why you need better schools) I don’t say you need to soften 100 % but although talking not always helps It rarely has don any harm.
You need friends and the last 8 years have been a disappointment of your leadership. It has made you weak. Take the money you are spending in Iraq and rebuild your nation as it should be. A land of opportunity.

Posted by: Kris | May 15, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Hap,
Nice Alien reference!

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

One basis their comments on history and fact, the other on gut instinct. I believe he should read up on history or be doomed to repeat it. By the way – how much foreign policy experience does the good Senator have?

Posted by: rich | May 15, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

The Bushies are experts at misinformation. For all you who blindly follow – start doing a little research. Check out what the FBI in Minneapolis knew about the terrorist attack before it happened! Bush’s war on terrorism in Iraq is a farce. He got America into a sandtrap in Iraq because he had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein. No, we should NEVER negotiate with terrorists. I’m at the point where I honestly don’t care what party is in office! But I do want an administration that when given clear clues to stop a terrorist attack, will follow through. There was no need to waste over 4000 American lives and dump untold fortunes into this war that had nothing to do with terrorist attacks against our nation!

Posted by: Todd | May 15, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

i think the appeaser was prescott bush who provided cash to hitler, as george now appeases the bin laden family

Posted by: marty | May 15, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

I cant figure out if some on this board are kidding or have drank to much of the Bush kool aid — ok lets have a reality check – Carter was crappy – but history will remember Bush as worse – just the facts. Bush has killed a thriving economy – two wars – no WMD – inflation overload – yeah the Repubs past 8 years do give me reason to want something different

Posted by: dave | May 15, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Obama is endorsed by Hamas, which has
actually set up internet-phone banks to campaign for him….yet that doesn’t bother him in the least!
Obama is the ultimate useful idiot.
‘Nuff said.

Posted by: Nodog | May 15, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

“I love this theme that Obama will talk to our enemy. But yet he won’t go on Fox News. What a brave man.”
Hahaha, you’re kidding, right? Fox News is about as fair and balanced as the Taliban. I wouldn’t want to go on Fox either.

Posted by: Kori | May 15, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

The US President is correct. Appeasement and talk is utter foolishness with people who will use that to simply position themselves to destroy you. It appears to be the same in American politics where one politician will fake that he is offended at something another says to falsely use that emotional moment to warp himor herself in the pity-me blanket.
Mr. Obama is not ready for the office of the US presidency…President Bush, on the other hand, has shown that a strike back at the bad guy ends up doing more to protect a land than sitting still and “talking” to them. I would suggest that Americans stop bashingPresident Bush and start taking to task all those legislators who thwart real efforts to get the bad guys of the world.

Posted by: Dave, Pretoria, South Africa | May 15, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Obama is a colossal jewel of glittering ignorance. It is statements like his, Hillary’s, and Bob Barr’s that give the terrorists hope; that if they can simply hang on until Bush leaves, we’ll pull out of Iraq, essentially removing their greatest obstacle to reconstituting their power and influence.

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

In Mecca, they have that right to become like the stone cold rock that they believe in!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Bush would just point a bomb at them and let it work. We should have learned form the Hezballah attacks and Isreal’s impotent response, violence is not the only means to acheive political settlements.
walk softly and carry a big stick, worked for Teddy and can work again.

Posted by: scott jeffries | May 15, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

President Bush has made a total shambles of our foreign policy. He has rushed us into war, mad a mockery of the use of diplomacy, and thumbed his nose at the rest of the world.
He and his courtiers have done everything they can to suspend our Constitutional Rights. They talk a mean game all the while stripping citizens of their rights in the name of “security”. Security of the State does not equate always square with security and freedom for it’s citizens. Or should we just describe ourselves as subjects these days?
It is a glowing testament to the durability of the Constitution that we have survived eight years of his wanton incompetency.

Posted by: Jim | May 15, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

the bush family is a family of appeasement, why do you think osama is still on the loose and why we diverted attention from the real terrorist to iraq? the close association betweent the bush family and the bin laden family.

Posted by: marty | May 15, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Great political theater. I can smell the handiwork of Bush, Rove McCain and Lieberman here.

Posted by: NY | May 15, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

I think Obama has the knowledge, skills, and abilities to run this Country right in the ground, lets give him the chance we can believe in.

Posted by: John Dillard | May 15, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

McCain eats babiezzzz

Posted by: fartman | May 15, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Most of these commenters are neither liberal or conservative, just frightened children looking for protection from the boogy man.
Lincoln was wrong. Evidently you CAN fool most of the people most of the time.
You sad, pathetic, little children; you have gotten the leaders you deserve, and will continue to, until you grow up. The rest of the world is waiting…

Posted by: Tanya | May 15, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

The Israelis were probably snickering at the fool. Bush sounds ignorant of the fact that Israel was formed out of acts of terror.

Posted by: Javalation | May 15, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Bush worse than Carter????
Were you even alive during the Carter years???
You Libs were saying the same thing about Reagan back then and history has proved him right. Give it at least 10 years before you start judging Bush in your “history lesson”.

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Before making comments like the Baffoon Mr. Bush, I suggest you go to Iran and see for yourself what the Iranians think of the US. You will be shocked to learn that 95% of Iranians can’t wait for a thaw in relations with the US and that most Iranians show nothing but respect for the United States and its people, however that should not be translated into respect for the greatest Baffoon in U.S. history.

Posted by: Christian | May 15, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Dearest indykat: you will reach enlightenment on the glorious day of Obama ascending into the heavens, and making a new heaven and a new earth. What? Oh you don’t think he Jesus? Coulda fooled me.

Posted by: fxmulder | May 15, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

to those blaming Bush for the war continuing, I believe the democat controled house and senate could change that if the wanted. Oh yeah, they seemed to have wanted to when they were running for election, but you don’t hear much of that from the Pelosi’s and Reid’s of the world. Wonder why? Follow the money… We have an Oligarchy, and yes they thrive on useful idiots – look in the mirror

Posted by: rich | May 15, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

I heard part of Bush’s address. The chosen people taking their land. He is not doing mcuh to help the peace talks with the Palistians. clinging to bibilical phrases is not a way to achieve the US goals and aims for the region.
We should all realize that the Bush policies have produced failure in US aims. 82% of the us think we are on the wrong tracks. The GOP leadership is talking about distancing themselves from Bush so as to not appear to be continuation of his policies.

Posted by: scott jeffries | May 15, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Let’s stay in Iraq spenting more money, and afterall the economy is melting down. The power of US is not as strong as used to be, just because a group of folks that “thinks” that the foreign problems are domestics problems and they can be resolved shotting ;-). That’s great for the rest of the world.
Keep working guys!

Posted by: HG | May 15, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

GW is the house servant and “appeaser” for investment banks, oil companies, drug companies and health insurance companies while ordinary Americans go bankrupt.

Posted by: NY | May 15, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

All Hail Lord Obama! and pass the kool aid.

Posted by: luce_sociator | May 15, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Why just the other day, Hillary was dodging bullets trying to have a talk with Ahmadinejad and Chavez. There was incoming rounds all over the place. Poor woman had to run for cover.

Posted by: Swami | May 15, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Get over yourself Obama – it’s not always about you. In case you haven’t figured it out, these terrorists want to kill us – they don’t want to meet with you for milk and cookies. You call yourself Commander in Chief material – good grief, this country is in for it if you are elected. I bet the terrorists are just waiting for you to get elected.

Posted by: Ravenhair49 | May 15, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Wow. The amount of stupid in these comments makes me weep for our nation. Democracy is a good idea only if the people care to take a sober and educated look at the issues. All of you who are beating your breast and shouting epithets…you are not patriots. You are zealots, and not much different from the terrorists you claim to despise.
Grow up.

Posted by: Jack | May 15, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Unbelievable how this Nation has become a Nation of fear through failed leaders like Bush.
Thank GOD that HE sends someone who dare challenging the politics of fearmongering.
GOD has NOT given us a spirit of fear, but of power, of love and of a sound mind.
Vote OBAMA for a politic of reconciliation and tolerance.
We cannot state our positions to our enemies if we do not talk to them.

Posted by: JohnS | May 15, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Hey NY…GWB isn’t running for office, moron. Try to keep up.

Posted by: IOWNU | May 15, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

bush is right.obama is wrong.

Posted by: delite820 | May 15, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Jack,
Thanks for putting us in our place. You who are so wise and virtuous! Lead us won’t you?

Posted by: Thanks | May 15, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

This article is silly. The author is stretching to beyond context to try and make Bush and Cheney the center of OBAMA’s weakening campaign strategy. Any moron knows that Bush was criticising Carter who just met with Hamas.
If you read Cheney’s statements that follow, he is disagreeing with the candidates. That’s not a criticism of the candidates, just simple dissagreement.
The prupose of this article is to interpret everything as a slight against Obama “the annointed one”, then come to his rescue, and innoculate him from real criticism before it arrives in the general election.
Hey Senator, bad news: you won’t be able to build a campaign centered against “the last 8 years of Bush” when we are voting for the NEXT 4 of whoever. It didn’t work for Kerry and we are definately going to criticise all of you politicians.

Posted by: nick daytona | May 15, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Way to go Bush! Obama and his naive group of followers are a bunch of idiots. It’s unbelievable how democrats can put up two pathetic choices for President!!

Posted by: James Gerber | May 15, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

“Those who talk appease”…
Actually, those who don’t talk show that they are being coerced by a foreign government(Israel) into destroying yet another country for their security.

Posted by: Dave | May 15, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

McCain has promise to appoint ultraconservative Supreme Court justices who would expand police powers and reduce personal freedoms. Scalia is one of his favorites. Scalia, who on 60 minutes said that the constitution only bars the authorities from using torture as punishment, that nothing was said about using it to get information. This alone is reason enough to not vote for McCain.

Posted by: Javalation | May 15, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I start to prefer China over America. I hope this does not represent the opinion of the majority of the American people. You have no clue what you are all saying. Maybe they should throw a bomb on you as you suggest to do on others and kill some of your children. ( this is the reacion you will get on your remarks ) good luck.

Posted by: Kris | May 15, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

With Mc Cain being pretty much a liberal and Obama at least being ok with his liberalness I feel compelled to support the man and his ideas. After all OIL is up again today and my investments have me in aprecarious position where I am more afraid of being a bag holder with worthless stock then the lingering fear of some apocalyptic attack on america. Terrorism is terrible but whats worse is not eve having a chance to make a living. Bush’s war has to end so we can be rich again.

Posted by: David Vida | May 15, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Kris,
English speak much???

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

You make a good point, Christian, about 95% of Iranians wanting good relations with the US. I’d venture it’s even higher than that. But notice the audience you’re trying to speak to here – rabid hate-mongers who preach and probably practice the lowest form of social interaction: fear based reactions to anything different from themselves. They call themselves patriots. They are the Tribe called Fear.

Posted by: Tanya | May 15, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

What part of 7 years of doing this is not working? How anybody with even an once of brains can support plans that don’t work. Would you buy a new car that didn’t work and keep hoping for 7 years that one day it will? The plan for Iraq does not work, the plan for the economy does not work. The plan for health care does not work. The plan for everything does not work. At what point will this sink in, when you’re drafted at 60 years old to fight in a 100 year war, when you lose your home, or can’t use your car because gas is 20 bucks a gallon? At what point does it have to be for some of you knuckleheads?

Posted by: Jake | May 15, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

This from a president who gave up the game of golf so he can stand in solidarity with the families of the fallen solders. What a moron! Him and Cheney should be tried for the war crimes they have committed in the last 5 years.

Posted by: linda anderson | May 15, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Obama is such a baby.
He can’t even defend his comments and this AGAIN shows how inexperienced he is at foreign policy.
Obama should return to his old district and “finally” help the poor people in the “south-side” of Chicago.
Americans “aren’t” going to promote a guy that never “solved” the problems of the folks he represented at the state level.
Regarding Obama…………..NEXT!

Posted by: Allen Ridge | May 15, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

The question remains what has Bush done in his 8 years apart from bankrupting us.. and taking this economy into a recession.
I feel sorry for Barack he has some cleaning up to do.
No wonder he carries the lowest rating of any president in its History. he needs to shut his pie hole and sit low and exit without being notice because he hasn’t done anything .
You might as well had put in the dead guy from the movie ~weekend at bernie~ in the oval office, my bet more stuff would have gotten done.
When you look up the WORD USELESS Bush picture is right next to it.

Posted by: max | May 15, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Posted by tina Fresno:I voted for Bush twice before and would happily do so again without thinking.
Sure thing please vote for mccain, the lives and blood of over 4 thousand American dead in iraq is in the hands of people like you and the Republican party!!!

Posted by: clobber_tank | May 15, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

In 1938, Neville Chamberlain tried to negotiate by appeasement, however such actions allowed Hitler to measure his opponents as weak, and unprepared, and thus only hastened entry into World War II and ultimately specific attacks on Great Britain itself. … Dave , CA

Posted by: Dave Robertson | May 15, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

A lot of what comes out of the mouth of George Bush is just downright embarrassing…HOWEVER..this statement he made to the Knesset is right on the spot!

Posted by: TSue | May 15, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Having read through the comments, it is clear that this nation needs a 2nd civil war.
Democrats started the last one…they have earned the next one.

Posted by: George Dixon | May 15, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Thanks,
Hey, sorry if I struck a nerve. It’s just frustrating to know that the majority of voters in our country don’t really care about the nuances of the issues. They just want to be right. They just want “their team” to win. And I’m talking about both sides here. It’s ignorance, plain and simple.
So, yeah…just keep calling our political leaders morons. Keep saying that Muslims are evil. Keep assuming that everyone who is different is an enemy. Keep throwing around insults, because that’s the way to lead our country to greatness.

Posted by: Jack | May 15, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I voted for Bush twice before and would happily do so again without thinking. Tina Fresno Well, you said it yourself “…happily do so WITHOUT THINKING”… Thanks Tina, and others like you for the mess we have today. Karma will get you back!

Posted by: Mrs. Tiggywinkle | May 15, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

George Bush is an arrogant fool that thinks that America has the right to police the world.
Check your history book about the British empire….

Posted by: Jack | May 15, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

When you look up the WORD USELESS Bush picture is right next to it.
Posted by: max |
—————————–
I justed looked “useless” up in the dictionary and there is a picture of our 110th Do Nothing Democrat Congress with the lowest approval ratings in the history of Congress and a full 10% below the approval rating of our President…………fyi….

Posted by: Allen Ridge | May 15, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Joseph007,
Which of Obama’s policies do you think would reduce the price of gas? Just curious.

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

safety is all that matters to citizens from its government. all other considerations are conversation by comparison. NObama is a security moron. McCain sucks, but he will keep us safe. Thats all that matters in 2008.

Posted by: fezziwig | May 15, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

I guess Bush would know a thing or two about Appeasement. Bush was the one, after all, that Appeased the Saudi’s after 9/11. Let’s see, 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi, a 16th Saudi that was late for his flight was later caught, put in Gitmo and he may be released soon! Good thing for Saudi Arabia that I wasn’t the Commander in Chief after 9/11, I most certainly would have Appeased the Saudi King and Princes with a little Democracy…
I guess Bush’s plan for Saudi Appeasement by paying them off with 100/barrel oil worked, job well done sir. My hat is off to you…

Posted by: TheAppeaser | May 15, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

If you liked Carter you’ll LOVE Osama

Posted by: telecaster | May 15, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

I believe Obama when he says he would know how to speak with terrorists. After all, until recently he spoke with his terrorist friend William Ayers on a regular basis.

Posted by: beo | May 15, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

What Bush said is both accurate and historically true. It didn’t work for Chamberlain either. It actually empowered Hitler.

Posted by: Nathan K | May 15, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Al Queda is a creation of the CIA and the Military. Any attempt to leave the current policies will result in a attack here but supplied by our own weapons we have deliverd to those that work for the CIA.

Posted by: Todd Riale | May 15, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Fox is waiting for the O campaign to respond! Let’s guess what their answer will be: he never really meant what he said in the debate, he’s sorry, he now
separates himself with his WORDS, just words. He no longer will associate himself with Those Words. Those words are not representative of who HE is!

Posted by: JulesfromTX | May 15, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

As an Obama supporter I will say that it is certainly possible that the president’s remark was not directed at the senator. This administration cannot help but throw out unsubstantiated quotes from who knows where and then tell us how they stand against it because it is the right thing to do. I think I’ll try incorporating it into my everyday speech. “I know some out there say that we should ban the use of deoderant but I think that kind of talk is just wrong and I’ll stand up for the American people in this fight.”

Posted by: TSnow27604 | May 15, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

If you could read my mind love*********, sing a song my people, make a joyful noise to the Lord. Help one another. Vote for peace and change. Elect uh,uh,-Charlie Brown.

Posted by: Gordon Lightfoot | May 15, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Joseph007,
Which of Obama’s policies do you think would reduce the price of gas? Just curious.Posted by: Drilling
HEY COMMON SENSE WOULD SAY IF YOU CAN SUCCESSFULLY USE LESS OIL, THE PRICES WILL FALL, THATS OBAMAS GOAL, TARGET RIDUCULOUS OIL AND GAS PROFITS AND REDUCE CONSUMPTION, AND GIVE REBATES TO EVERY TAX PAYER IN THE SHORT RUN TO HELP PAY FOR THE HIGH GAS PRICES….

Posted by: CLOBBER_TANK | May 15, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Even the most eloquent of you sound ridiculous.

Posted by: Doug | May 15, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Land of the free, home of the brave. The brave, right? You McCain supporters would do well to remember that.

Posted by: dob | May 15, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

I would like to know exactly what it is that Obama has hope for and what it is he is going to change?
I want specifics not just this make the world a better place, dogs and cats living together, lets all hold hands and smell the flowers crap.
What will he change and HOW?
I think hope is great, but I’d like to know what Obama is referring to when he talks about hope.
The man will end up winning the Presidency and no one will have any clue what the guy is even all about.

Posted by: Don | May 15, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Unfortunately, those media pundits got Bush elected. We aren’t going to let that happen this time! –Margaret

Posted by: MargaretMi | May 15, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Americans are great at two things: thinking they’re better than their neighbors, and hating their leaders while doing nothing to try and change.

Posted by: Doug | May 15, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

CLOBBER_TANK:
Obama has no accomplishments. It boggles the mind that we would even bother to pay attention to a person who has done very little to move this country forward. His resume has little to nothing on it except for being elected. So he can speak thanks for a bunch of liberal speech writers, he has no particular qualifications to be the president. Bush is not the best president we have had, but why replace him with an even dumber person?

Posted by: Chad | May 15, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Thanks,
First of all, you suggestion that an American citizen has no right to express an opinion unless they run for office is ludicrous, and frankly un-American. It is our duty to express our opinion. My complaint is that the people in these comments are just throwing around insults, not actually having any sort of exchange of ideas.
As for our political leaders being more knowledgeable…did you even read my posts? My complaint is that people in this thread are calling our leaders morons, which is obviously NOT true. Insults serve no purpose, and are not constructive to solving our country’s problems.
Your blind lashing out at me (when we actually seem to agree on this last issue) goes quite a ways to illustrate my point. Thanks, Thanks!

Posted by: Jack | May 15, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

McCain is the OBVIOUS choice.
Neither Clinton or Obama have what it takes to lead this country.

Posted by: Swami | May 15, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Wake up,people! Now is our chance to break the yoke of these FEAR MONGERERS. Love always trumps fear.The manipulation of populations through the use of psycological conditioning is as old as we have had populations of people on this planet. The ones doing the manipulating now, have made a science out of it and my guess would be that they have diverted more resources toward this method of control than you could possibly imagine(many,many times more than will ever be spent on the wars in the middle-east).The one thing with which we can truly over come the things that terrorize us is knowledge.Seek it! Seek to know the real truth!Alot of us are choking on the spoon-fed stuff that they give us and try to pass off as truth.Truth or lies, we have to use our very,very best judgement!! REMEMBER THE AGE-OLD ADAGE,DON’T BELIEVE EVERYTHING THAT YOU HEAR AND HALF OF WHAT YOU SEE? This could’nt be any more important than in today’s world!!! IF you love your children,your family,your neighbors and yourself seek the truth and FIND IT!!!!

Posted by: john | May 15, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

In reading the extremely narrow and comments coming from so many people who are so obviously uneducated and don’t have the slightest clue….its no wonder the rest of the world has concluded that the USA no longer has any moral authority whatsoever to be earth’s quiding light. God Help America!!!

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

If Obama is so unfit, how is it that he has raised more money than Clinton and McCain combined?
What makes someone qualified to be president? besides being bred for the part, going to the right schools, knowing the right people and being really wealthy? We have a caste system for selecting who takes office in this country, long lines of political families. This isn’t the old days when candidates had been generals and men who accomplished things. Don’t come at me with that POW crap, last time I checked, this country elected winners. GW beat the British, Andrew Jackson took Florida and pacified Indians, Grant beat the hillbillies, Eisenhower beat the nazis, and John McCain crashed his plane 4 times before being captured. He’s really a patriot president.
What am I saying? Im saying the only thing that qualifies you to be president is if you can win. Was Bush qualified? I think we can see by the result he wasn’t, but guess what…he won. Sorta. Might makes right, as far as Im concerned they’re all equal, sleeping in the white house doesnt make you qualified, neither does running every four years for the last 40. I hope Obama wins, but I think it’d be fun to see McCain win, and watch all the hillbillies realized they’d been hoodwinked again.

Posted by: Tou | May 15, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

SUCCESSFULLY USE LESS OIL – How, the demand is worldwide
TARGET RIDUCULOUS OIL AND GAS PROFITS – with what a cap on profits? What are you going to put a cap on next? Sounds a bit like socialism.
REDUCE CONSUMPTION – How?
AND GIVE REBATES TO EVERY TAX PAYER IN THE SHORT RUN TO HELP PAY FOR THE HIGH GAS PRICES….ah yes a bandaid. Those always work so well.
Here’s a thought,
Tell your DEMOCRAT lawmakers to allow drilling in ANWAR, the deep Gulf, and the Continental shelf. Stop blocking legislation to use nuclear power and build a couple of refineries. Ask Obama to do that. . .

Posted by: Drilling | May 15, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Obama has no experience.
Hillary “claims” 8 years of White House experience.
Is this the best Democrats can do?
McCain is a shoe-in.

Posted by: SmarterThanYou | May 15, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

You all appear to think you are very wise and that the knowledge you impart will enlighten us all.

Posted by: Don | May 15, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Obama just showed the world what a cry baby he is. Boo-hoo. Go Bush!

Posted by: curly | May 15, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

For all that insult Barak Obama, I assert that the validity of your statements are built upon quicksand and hold no moral truths to them. If you insult him and claim he cant do this and wont do that. prove it. where are the facts? if you cant find them…then shut up.

Posted by: Lockean Thinker | May 15, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

You tell him, Obama! Bush has ruined America. He’s a liar, a fraud and has the ratings to prove it. Stay after this pinhead until the day he leaves office. Then, maybe we can forget he ever happened. If we can’t, our grandkids can when they are paying the bills he created. The only creature lower than Bush is a snake. Same thing.

Posted by: Richard | May 15, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

HEY THINKABOUTIT!!! IT SEEMS TO ME YOU KNOW EVERYTHING THERE IS IN LIFE. SO WHY AREN’T YOU RUNNING AGAINST OBAMA OR FOR THAT MATTER RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT? CAN YOU DO A BETTER JOB? JUST A POOR, SORE LOSER!

Posted by: heyyou | May 15, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

To all the idiots out there: Wake up and smell the beauty of an Obama Presidency.
All of you are accustomed to the corporate tyranny. You cannot imagine a prince of peace like Obama to be given to America from the unseen forces of the universe.
You need to wake up from your corporate slavery mode and try a different approach to solving crises. George W is full of bluster. We have witnessed his kind of approach and witnessed where it led us to.

Posted by: anti-corporate-fascism | May 15, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Judging from the left’s reaction, truth truly does hurt.

Posted by: Reasoned | May 15, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

President Bush is right on the money! Obama himself stated that he would meet with Iran without preconditions. Came straight from the horse’s mouth.

Posted by: K | May 15, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Obama’s plan is to go to Iran and call the madman “Sweetie”

Posted by: geevill | May 15, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Let’s go over this slowly for the liberals that have a hard time understanding:
Have we had anything happen to us since 9/11/01 in the United States since we’ve gone on the offensive against terrorists?
You may not agree with the invasion of Iraq that was based on false intelligence (as I don’t), but his track record for keeping us from dying by the thousands speaks for itself.
Talking with terrorists (and affiliated groups) will not solve anything. They learn by force.

Posted by: CMG | May 15, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Obama is showing the signs of paranoia.Hmmm.
Mr. President?

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

anti-corporate-fascism just referred to Obama as the Prince of Peace.
Wow.
Your an idiot!

Posted by: Don | May 15, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

The senator Bush quotes was a Republican. Old school, real conservatives always resisted hasty charges to war. Wilson (D) said we need to be on the offensive to make the world safe for democracy, and put us in WWI. Truman (D) put us in Korea, and the people elected Eisenhower (R) to get us out. Johnson (D) Put us in Vietnam, and the people elected Nixon (R) to get us out. Neocons have never lived up to the real principles of the Republican Party.
If we are going to get attacked again, King George, it will be because of those two wide open gates to our North and South. Yes, the border guard is still serving 15 months in Iraq.

Posted by: Chris | May 15, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Obama is not just garbage. He is Muslim garbage, and so are all of the anti-American liberals who support him.

Posted by: Rusty | May 15, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Ordinarily I don’t agree with what Bush says. He tends to put his foot in his mouth most of the time and has no idea what he’s talking about.
In this case, what he said is absolutely true and I totally agree with him. I can’t see why people are upset with him.
Some people can’t be negotiated with. You simply have to deal with them in a more forceful way.

Posted by: Susanna K. Hutcheson | May 15, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

“Shaun — Yeah — like Clinton-North Korea?”
No more like Bush-North Korea. We are still working with them to halt their nuclear programs. Negotiations aren’t the end all be all, but they should be a tool in our arsenal. Or should we just invade there to?
I am disappointed by the quality of discussion in this thread. Too many people speak from their emotions rather than their brains. Keep spouting hate. Keep spouting racism. Keep spouting devisive statements about liberal or conservative. We’ll destroy ourselves before any terrorist has a chance…

Posted by: Shaun | May 15, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

CMG – I have a rock that prevents tiger attacks. Would you like to buy it?

Posted by: dob | May 15, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Wow, they sure are getting defensive! I mean, Bush didn’t mention any names, nor any office names (i.e. he didn’t say “the Senator from IL” or “House Speaker”). By the way the left is reacting, it’s as if they disagree with Bush and feel that it is indeed responsible to negotiate with terrorists. Otherwise, why get your burqas in a bunch, liberals?

Posted by: Crush Liberalism | May 15, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

We must kill all of our enemies before they get us. If we don’t bomb them they will invade our country and we will all be speaking arabic! A soldier like McCain knows how to eliminate our enemies.

Posted by: october155 | May 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Notice how almost all the pro-bomb Iran comments are coming from Jewish sounding names.Wonder why.

Posted by: mystic | May 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I think they could start a gameshow called who is the real Obama. Each week you get a small piece of information to help you piece together what he really stands for. A few days ago it got even more interesting when Obama stated that he had now campaigned in 57 states. Seemed like a slip of the tongue until someone pointed out that a quick web search shows that there are 57 Islamic states listed by the Orrganization of the Islamic Conference which has a permanent delegation to the UN. Freudian slip?

Posted by: dds | May 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

oh Lord, Barack IS bringing America together – I’m starting to think more like Bush!

Posted by: enlightened | May 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

President Bush is right. If Obama is elected, terrorist may use our commercial airplanes and fly them into our tall buildings and kill people. Vote republican!
Posted by: Tina Fresno | May 15, 2008 10:13:29 AM
But, Tina we have not as yet changed President and the terrorist accordingly used commercial planes and flew them into tall buildings. Now who is right or worse?

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Some people can’t be negotiated with. You simply have to deal with them in a more forceful way.
Posted by: Susanna K. Hutcheson | May 15, 2008 12:27:22 PM
Susanna–I can’t negotiate with my realtor. Can I nuke him??

Posted by: Doug | May 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

President Bush is right. If Obama is elected, terrorist may use our commercial airplanes and fly them into our tall buildings and kill people. Vote republican!
Posted by: Tina Fresno | May 15, 2008 10:13:29 AM
But, Tina we have not as yet changed President and the terrorist accordingly used commercial planes and flew them into tall buildings. Now who is right or worse?

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

So there are some such as the Jr. Senator from IL and now the “presumtive” nominee for President, who based on his broad experience (??)believe that we can talk to the rabid groups of Islamofacists? I think in his own mind he believes it is possible. I would rather see him volunteer as a hostage and talk his way out. It was only a week or two ago that Obama was sighting Roosevelt etc as being willing to talk to Hitler…what? I guess he spoke Roosevelt spoke volumes to Hitler with the Lend-Lease Programs to the Brit’s in 1940.
As for Madam Speaker…she should go back to Assad in Syria and make a laughing stock of herself once agian as the embarresment that she is.
Our Enemies have to be cheering for the “Useful Idiots” we seem to produce.

Posted by: Conan | May 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Obama is a Muslim
Michelle Obama is anti-American and anti-white.
Obama’s mother was an atheist.
Rev Wright hates America and white people.
Bamboozle and hoodwink.
“I will meet with terrorist with NO pre-conditions.
McCain supporters please also visit politico.com and the blog by Ben Smith to push back these extreme left Land Rover liberals!!!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Obama, my reaction to your reaction, you just lost my vote. You can’t appease those who wish to destroy you.

Posted by: Luis | May 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

95% the 9/11 hijackers (that we know of) were from Saudi Arabia. The Bush family has been in bed with that country for over 30 years! The Bin Ladin family was allowed to fly home out of the U.S. in the days after 9/11 while Americans were stranded wherever their planes were forced to land. Bush has a lot of nerve to offer such hypocrisy. As for the Nazi analogy – outgoing President Bush should look to his grandfather Prescott Bush’s shady dealings which assisted the Nazi party before invoking that Democrats favor appeasement.

Posted by: Shaun | May 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

The Media likes to say that Hillary gets the ‘Uneducated Voters’
Blacks don’t vote for her, so we’ll exclude them for now…
That means 48-49% of Whites are uneducated?
And 90-100% of the Blacks are educated? Because they vote for Obama?
Anybody out there believes the Media is ‘intellectually honest’ then you will believe anything!

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

From a soldier with 2 tours “Go Bush”!!!

Posted by: CW2 Sean | May 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

I am seeing a lot of opposition to Bush’s speech and I just wanted to post somewhere that I and my family 100% agree with the president. Who cares if Obama and Pelosi’s feelings are hurt. The truth hurts. You cannot negotiate with evil. God bless the president for not taking the popular road, but the right one.

Posted by: Charity | May 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Drilling: I have heard from some Washington Lobbyists saying that they can see themselves working with Obama (They don’t say the same about Hillary or McCain) to have the oils companies move in to the renewable energy industry without affecting some of their important shares in the market.
The reason oil companies killed the electric cars in the 90′s was because government policies didn’t give them the freedom to go in the alternative business without damaging their profits. If their profits are damaged so will be the economy because they hold a huge share of the market.
Obama’s policies towards renewable energy and bio diesel will allow Exxon mobile to make part of their 7 billion dollars per quarter on renewable energy and bio diesel. This means we will start getting away from oil consumption.

Posted by: Joseph007 | May 15, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Drilling: I have heard from some Washington Lobbyists saying that they can see themselves working with Obama (They don’t say the same about Hillary or McCain) to have the oils companies move in to the renewable energy industry without affecting some of their important shares in the market.
The reason oil companies killed the electric cars in the 90′s was because government policies didn’t give them the freedom to go in the alternative business without damaging their profits. If their profits are damaged so will be the economy because they hold a huge share of the market.
Obama’s policies towards renewable energy and bio diesel will allow Exxon mobile to make part of their 7 billion dollars per quarter on renewable energy and bio diesel. This means we will start getting away from oil consumption.

Posted by: Joseph007 | May 15, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Mr. Bush’s comments are disingenuous and really kind of laughable considering that this is the man who has single handedly ruined our reputation in the world and our economy with his lurching foreign policy and his notion that he is the savior of the world. These comments like Bush himself are irrelevant and if he had any intelligence at all he would keep his mouth shut until he can slink back to Crawford, TX like the failure he is.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Bush did exactly what Hitler did… he invaded a country without provocation, over false reasons, tortures people, lies about it all. So what the hell does his opinion of it matter?

Posted by: Dave | May 15, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Guilty conscience Mr. Obama? President Bush didn’t even refer to you in his speech.
By the way – our President is right on target with his remarks. The left needs to get over it – you cannot talk common sense with terrorists….. otherwise, they wouldn’t be terrorists!

Posted by: I'm Right.... You're Left | May 15, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Obama will lose 54 or 55 of the 57 states.

Posted by: Garland | May 15, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Bush had it right. I’ll be darned. I enjoyed McCains speech this morning too.
The DNC & Obama are too busy running contrary to what this country is about. The cut two whole states out that could have won them the election and then send in the man who vetoed their chances to “mend the fences.” That’s funny.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

dob:
Cute. But the track record speaks for itself.

Posted by: CMG | May 15, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Left Wingers suck.

Posted by: Left Wingers Suck | May 15, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Worlds MOST stupid man never dare to show any sanity.RIP . Dubba Bush.

Posted by: Tariq Ahmed | May 15, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

I see Obama has now changed his list of diplomatic heroes to JFK, Nixon and Reagan since he made this statement after the NC primary:
‘I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies, like Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.’
Let’s see, Roosevelt: no diplomacy other than unconditional surrender. Truman: no change in policy except rather than diplomacy used atomic bombs. Kennedy: I guess he has a point but Kennedy’s diplomacy nearly caused WWIII when a determined show of military force would have probably been a more effective strategy. Kruschev knew America had military might but wasn’t sure if JFK would use it.
I’m all for diplomacy when warranted but it is pointless among sworn enemies.

Posted by: Sparkler | May 15, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Yes, being nice or benign to the bad guys worked the FIRST time they tried to take down the building. Clinton simply turned it over to local cops…couldn’t recognize terrorists in his back yard…so they simply tried from above the next time. And then he thought he better not get rid of Osama when he had him in his sights…again that nice kindness also worked. Learn from history or repeat it. And I doubt if anyone who is considered to be a muslim apostate should go for tea at Iran’s or Syria’s house. Maybe the chitchat should be held elsewhere!

Posted by: ck | May 15, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

GOOD MORING DEVIL.
HI OBAMA.
HOW IS YOUR DAY GOING DEVIL?
NOT TOO GOOD OBAMA.
WELL, DON’T WORRY DEVIL, I’M THE NEW PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. I WILL HELP YOU WORK THINGS OUT WITH PEOPLE THAT HATE YOU.
THANK YOU OBAMA. YOU ARE A REAL BROTHER.

Posted by: JARIAH | May 15, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

The statement in the ABC News O’Keefe posting is correct. Do not pander, do not appease. Hussein killed hundreds of thousands of his own countrymen and used poison gas. Regime change should have been done in ’91, when it would have been more ‘popular’.
The first Left Saviour, B.J.Clinton recommended action against him several times. But this is also the guy who took no action aganst osama bin landen after other bombings… because it might not have been ‘popular’.
Mike Savage for President ’08.
vsk

Posted by: vsk | May 15, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

more typical reaction from barack. everything is about him and it’s always some kind of personal offense. he’s misquoted or taken out of context or misunderstood or it’s a staffer’s fault. suprised he forgot to include a charge of racism this time. the democrats are mad to think that he’s their best candidate. they want to replace bush’s alleged arrogance with mr.arrogance himself. amazing.

Posted by: el polacko | May 15, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Worlds MOST stupid man never dare to show any sanity.RIP . Dubba Bush.

Posted by: Tariq Ahmed | May 15, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

The enemy loves it when you talk to them–it provides the perfect smoke screen to continue doing what they are doing behind the scenes without drawing notice.
“Talk solely and carry a small stick” just doesn’t work.

Posted by: Logic Lee | May 15, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Don’t get me wrong because I am not a Bush fan but quite frankly, Obama has no business slamming the current President publicly as if he knows better. NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER. He is a chronic EGOMANIAC.

Posted by: Nikki | May 15, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

When you have the greatest military in the world, you use it, our military = a hammer, and any problem we encounter what do we see it as? A nail because we do not know how to solve problems any other way. We like to stick with what we are good at.

Posted by: Chase | May 15, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Wow!…I find some of you people so funny. Your knowledge and understanding is about as deep as a thimble. I swear if it were not for the soundbite speculation of some news shows, some of you would have nothing to say.
The days of showing off the guns and nuclear arsenal and getting the rest of the world to bow down are over. It is going to take a coordinated approach to get America back to where it needs to be.
Sending the Army and Marine Corps to fight that “country” called terrorism and secure its “borders” isn’t going to get it done. It will just serve further wear our military thin. Point being you fight the idea/tactic of terrorism using just guns; people will only be concernced about what you think when they believe you are concerned about what they think. You can’t bring democracy at the end of a gun barrel.

Posted by: PHCDR Herm | May 15, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Right on Bush, now if we can just stop negotiating with Mexico and get the illegals out of this country. Too bad Bush’s legacy won’t be remembered for the good he has done because he has allowed so much harm via Mexican border.

Posted by: MV7 | May 15, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Why did Obama assume George Bush was talking about him? I guess Obama knows his own policies.

Posted by: Rich | May 15, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

omg….what rock did you 28%’s crawl out from under today to post you idiotic dribble today. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT THIS COUNTRY HAS EVER HAD ….PERIOD.And you idiots would follow him to the depts of hell if he told you that is was a nice place.You all really need to see a shrink….seriously.

Posted by: jeniffer | May 15, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

It is amazing that Obama has taken this as a personal shot. President Bush has made many speeches that say the exact same thing he said in Israel. Either Obama’s feeling guilty or he thinks the world does revolve around him to think that Bush’s comments were directed towards him. Additionally, Obama doesn’t understand the nature of our enemies in Iran. Their radical doctrine is simple, Westerners are Infidels and are therefore subject to extermination. No conversation nor great speech will change that foundationary belief. Unfortunately, I believe another attack on U.S. soil will allow those who believe in apeasement to finally see the light.

Posted by: Rob Ave | May 15, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Bush is dead right here. This needs to be said and hammered into the head of the brain dead immoral liberal idiots including that Obama idiot.

Posted by: starchaser | May 15, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

The Pope:
first of all, you are not the Pope….However, I do believe that Pope Benedict prefers diplomacy over bombs….
Now, concerning my vast military experience….Well, I’ve served in both the Army and Air Force…I’ve also served abroad….
Diplomacy and peaceful resolutions should ALWAYS be of top priority….The days of bombs and senseless killings like in Vietnam should be long over….When will this world realize that an eye for eye and a tooth for a tooth will leave the world blind and toothless? If we do not learn to live together as brothers and sisters, we will all perish together as fools…–Dr. Martin L. King, Jr.
I believe in peaceful resolutions to problems…They work at all levels of relationships….from family, marriages, friends, and foes; work and community….and nations too….Peaceful cooexistence can be acquired when grown men and women behave like it…

Posted by: tony | May 15, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Why do people believe the president has so much control over the economy and gas prices? There’s actually very little the president can do in the short term to help either. Tax and regulation policies can (and should) be set to promote growth long-term, but economies are cyclical by nature – there are going to be recessions and booms no matter what party is in control. Assigning credit for recessions or booms to a president or party is nonsensical.
Gas prices will continue to be artificially inflated by OPEC’s supply controls and there’s nothing we can do about it until we find a better way to store energy. There’s plenty of blame to go around for our dependence on foreign oil – we didn’t learn our lesson 30 years ago during the gas shortage and we’re now paying the price. Both parties have done nothing in 30 years to make us energy independent, and frankly the American public would never have allowed either party to spend the insanely large amount of money that would be needed to do that back in the days of $1/gallon gas.
It never ceases to amaze me how focused people are on blaming political parties instead of figuring out solutions.

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Bush has repeatedly shown himself to be a n utter failure in domestic and foreign policy. Obama is kind enough to remind us of that fact.
Obama’s job as president will be to protect this country from all enemies–foreign and domestic. And in this response, he’s proved that he can do both at the same time.

Posted by: slag | May 15, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Rev Wright and Louis Farrakhan went to Libya to meet with Khadafi.
Barry Hamas Obama wants Rev Wright’s foreign policy advise obviously.

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Americans are great at two things: thinking they’re better than their neighbors, and hating their leaders while doing nothing to try and change them.
-Doug
————————————–
Well fcuk!n9 said!

Posted by: Joseph007 | May 15, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

<>
Shaun – while we are playing that game, look no further than your liberal poster boys the Kennedys and check out what bootlegger Joe their father had going with the Nazis.

Posted by: I'm Right..... You're Left | May 15, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

And again I say for all that insult Barak Obama, I assert that the validity of your statements are built upon quicksand and hold no moral truths to them. If you insult him and claim he cant do this and wont do that. prove it. where are the facts? if you cant find them…then shut up.

Posted by: Lockean Thinker | May 15, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

test. as my content is being blocked

Posted by: rufus1133 | May 15, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Uh, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, Bombing Iraq and Afghanistan were “all talk and no action?” How much more action did you want? Maybe we could have bombed another aspirin factory and killed some more innocent janitors for you, eh.

Posted by: Lucille Haney | May 15, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Al Queda is not a creation of the CIA, however it is unequivocally in Iraq because of Bush’s failed policies in the Middle East. This Baffoon needs to leave office before he gets us into another multi-trillion dollar war with Iran. The best way to defeat the Mullahs in Iran is to ignore the oligarchy of clerics that rule that country and I will assure you that the people will overthrow them, however if we decide to go to war short of nuking Iran the ramifications will be far more costly than an entire generations tax cuts proposed by the most liberal proponent of tax cuts in the Republican administration. Conclusion, we don’t need tax cuts when the costs are a $10 trillion dollar war and oil at $200 a barrel. An attack on Iran will be a major faux pas on US foreign policy that will cost us much more than anything these war mongers can imagine. I only wish those of us that advocate war with Iran would also volunteer to join the Armed Forces.
Last but not least, a war with Iran would do nothing to benefit US interest in the ME but rather strengthen the Mullahs who thrive on adversity with the US. Short of Nuking Iran and a full blown Draft we have no chance of succeeding, so our next best option is to leave the Mullahs in their own quagmire and hope that the people eventually topple them. Just remember, US adversity towardds Iran is nothing other than the fodder that feeds the Mullahs.

Posted by: Christian | May 15, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

I justed looked “useless” up in the dictionary and there is a picture of our 110th Do Nothing Democrat Congress with the lowest approval ratings in the history of Congress and a full 10% below the approval rating of our President…………fyi….
Posted by: Allen Ridge | May 15, 2008 12:05:55 PM
_______________________________________
last i check.. who has the power to VETO BILLS, and President USELESS is doing it like its going out of style , no wonder nothing is geting done.
But i thought you knew that , I guess NOT.

Posted by: i-see-dumb-people | May 15, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Why doesn’t Obama step aside so the Democrats have a chance of winning in the fall?

Posted by: Stan | May 15, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Let’s hear the turth. How many of you who still support Bush (I voted for him in 2000 but not 2004) drive a pickup truck? I think this would shed a lot of light on this thread…

Posted by: Speak the Truth | May 15, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Obama and crew are reactionary morons

Posted by: Bud | May 15, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

I just want to be safe and I dont see how Clinton or Obama are going to do that. What would they do to protect my family and me? Get rid of the patriot act? Sell more military secrets to the Chinese? Give N. Korea another chance? Tell Iran we are sorry and to please stop stockpiling nuclear materials and to be nice to Isreal? I hear people say there are more terrorists now…but what did Clinton do to prevent the first world trade bombing or the second and what did Carter do to prevent hostages from being taken in Iran? They hated us as much then as they do now. I think they have always been there and always will be…and although I dont agree with a lot of what Bush does I dont want to have to tell my kids I voted for a democrat when the next terrorist strike was made possible by their weak policies.

Posted by: niftyswell | May 15, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Just wait. . .
Every one thinks that once the Libs get into office (heaven forbid) All the world will smell like roses……. I have some poetry in that ………. Because while smelling the roses the Fruit Cake Islamist Terrorists, Chinese and Russians will be taking over the world Right under our noses…….. ……………..

Posted by: Drock | May 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

If the Republican party hadn’t been hijacked by the religous right and the extremist neo-con ilk, would we still be in this mess?
The democrats are all over the place with their ideas but at least they are mostly positive and attempting to move the country forward. All I hear from the the right wing is racist, hate speach, pro-death warmongering, etc…. they think the 80′s (Reagan) was the golden age.
We need to flush these zealots (all of you who call Obama a Muslim, etc..) out of the republican party so we can have reasonable discussions again. I think a lot of democrats would listen and consider rationale/reasonable conservative ideas from reasonable people like Ron Paul if the rest of the GOP wasn’t such a bag of confrontational religious warhawk wingnuts.

Posted by: Bud | May 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Funny, throughout the Cold War, we had dialogue with USSR, and this resulted in its collapse. Anyone see Charlie Roise last night? General Sir Michael Rose spoke of dialogue with one’s enemies. What’s the use of talking only to one’s friends? Mandela who won the Nobel Peace Prize also spoke of dialogue and criticised the US harshly for invading Iraq with diplomacy via the UN.All you Bush supporters are doing is supporting Hitler who also invaded a sovereign nation without preliminary diplomacy.

Posted by: mystic | May 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

ABC anyone but clinton

Posted by: j | May 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Tina Fresno
That is the problem
“Without thinking”
May be you should start thinking before you vote

Posted by: Fabian | May 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

ABC anyone but clinton

Posted by: j | May 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Bush speaks from his administration’s experience with North Korea. Bush learned nothing from Clinton’s experience and continued the same failed appeasement policy.
We talked with North Korea and appeased them.

Posted by: SunnyvaleKen | May 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Barack Hussein Obama received early Islamic training…fact.
Barack Hussein Obama was registered by his family as a Muslim at both of the schools he attended…fact.
Hamas leader Ahmed Yousef’s endorsed Obama with the words “We like Mr. Obama and we hope that he will win the election.”
Nuff said.

Posted by: Poobah | May 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Let’s see – Bush screwed up —
Well – we were attacked on 9/11 – nope – that was Clinton’s doing – he was to busy F’n Monica to take care of the problem for 8 years.
Faltering economy in 2000 – nope – that was under Clinton’s watch too
Stock market hit an all time high in 2007 – yeah – that was Bush
Bad Mortgage law to give liberals a chance to buy a house when they didn’t have the money – nope – democratic congress
Yep – I gues I see where the libs are coming from

Posted by: mida | May 15, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Bush is right. I support the strong President of the United States, even though I am a Democrat. It looks like Obama is trying to use Bush speeches as a direct attack on him. Shame on you, Obama. All you have been doing is whinning, as if those who are differ than you are attacking you or racist. I am sick and tired of Obama’s whining and unpatriotic attitude.
NO OBAMA! If the media keeps up with favoring Obama, instead of giving fair news to the public, I will switch to FOX NEWS only.

Posted by: tigerjcs | May 15, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

This commentaries confirms the 28% who support the President still believes he is always right despite the current state of the union.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

I have to agree you can tell most of those opions here are really because Obama is black. It’s to bad there are so many bacward thinking people in our great country… Hopefully time will bring about the change of heart our people need and our children deserve!!!
Obama 08

Posted by: BEOWULF | May 15, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

GO BUSH!!! HECK YEAH!!!
Finally, some back bone!!! call it what it is….appeasement!
The problem with Liberals and Democrats is that they hate it when they are put in front of a mirror that shows them who they truly are…
Obama is a Carter, a Chamberlin…..If France and England would have taken Hitler on in 1933, WWII, the death of millions of human beings would have been avoided. But the liberals in England and France thought they could talk to Hitler, sell the lives of countless Czechs in the process to avoid WWII. Now we know better. Why don’t Liberals learn from history, why?
The problem with too many American voters is that they are 100% ignorant of history….
Example: How can any person that is well educated allow Obama to get away with the lie that FDR, Harry Truman and JFK talked directly with America’s enemies. NONE of these Presidents ever spoke directly with any of America’s enemies. Yet a few nights ago, Obama made such a claim and he was applauded by the mindless, uneducated masses! how truly sad for this nation that we have such a charlatan running for office.
Obama is a very dangerous left wing radical, he will take the USA into dark times. God help us all if this radical gets elected.

Posted by: CJ | May 15, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

As they say in Israel in Hebrew { AL ROSH HAGANV BOER HA KOVA )

Posted by: ariel | May 15, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Want to know what an Obama presidency would look like. Look no further than Jimmy Carter. They are cut from the same cloth, share the same delusional ideologies, and ultimately have both demonstrated their willingness to abandon allies and knife friends. Et tu Brutus sound familiar?

Posted by: TexasTrails | May 15, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Vote for Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Kigwa | May 15, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Vote for Hillary!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Kigwa | May 15, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Talking to a rattlesnake won’t make NOT bite you. That’s what rattlesnakes do – they bite. Iran, who thinks America is the Great Satan and they won’t change their religious mind because Obama says: “PLEASE LIKE US/ WE ARE REALLY NICE PEOPLE !” How stupid!!

Posted by: Wanda | May 15, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Amen……………………..
Let’s see – Bush screwed up —
Well – we were attacked on 9/11 – nope – that was Clinton’s doing – he was to busy F’n Monica to take care of the problem for 8 years.
Faltering economy in 2000 – nope – that was under Clinton’s watch too
Stock market hit an all time high in 2007 – yeah – that was Bush
Bad Mortgage law to give liberals a chance to buy a house when they didn’t have the money – nope – democratic congress
Yep – I gues I see where the libs are coming from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
amen
….Drock

Posted by: Drock | May 15, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Almost all of you supporters of bombing Iran without dialogue are doing so because of your Zionist blind support of warmongering Israe, despite detriment and harm to the US. Look where that got us with Iraq.But hey, who cares about taking the lives of non-Jews? After all the Talmud says it’s OK.

Posted by: mystic | May 15, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

What a bunch of moronic posts! He did go on Fox News! Second, is there an echo in the room? How many times does Obama have to say he is committed to Isreal and will not negotiate with Hamas, Hesbollah or any other nut group over there that are terrorist organizations!
Regarding talking with other governments we don’t like, maybe its better to lie to America then use shock and awe in lieu of diplomacy! Condi has done such a great job, best Sec. of State ever! AYOOURFMIND!
This will make another Letterman Great speech in American History!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

I assume that the President will reprimand his Secretary of Defense for making the public assertion that we sit down and talk to the same folks that Sen. Obama has said that he’d talk to after certain parameters were agreed upon.
“You can’t fight a 21st century war with 20th century strategies and you certainly can’t win one with a 20th century mindset.”
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Posted by: Benjamin | May 15, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

yet we see how bush’s negotiations are…..”strike now and find out there is actually no threat later”

Posted by: todd | May 15, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Any disagreement with “The Messiah Obama” is going to be reported by the fawning media as an attack by the extreme right wing attack machine

Posted by: frank | May 15, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

mystic stated:
“Funny, throughout the Cold War, we had dialogue with USSR, and this resulted in its collapse.”
But mystic is an idiot because it wasn’t “dialogue” that was the downfall of the Soviet Union. We simply outspent them militarily. Mystic…you need to have your nurse push your wheelchair closer to your keyboard so you can use your forehead pointer to peck out something intelligent.

Posted by: SmarterThanYou | May 15, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Kigwa:
Hillary is History!!!
Obama 2008!!!

Posted by: tony | May 15, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

My My ..we are so defensive…
Bush has been saying the same things since 9/11.. Obama is full of himself if he thinks Bush meant him and him only….
STOP A SECOND TERM OF CARTER PRESIDENCY…

Posted by: frieda | May 15, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

I agree with the comment made above that we should not have gone in to Iraq, but now we’re there and to up and leave without ensuring stability is insane. While I’m a devout Republican, I am not real happy with the way Bush has handled many things; however, I also know the president of this country has little actual power without the consent of Congress. So, if you really want to know where to place your blame, try there first – Congress. Our political system in this country has become so partisan I believe they would cut their noses off to spite their face (ie., vote against what ever it is the other party wants, no matter how much good it might do as a whole). And that goes for Democrats as well as Republicans! That is a sad state of affairs. There’s a few things I have observed in my lifetime: raising the minimum wage does no good, it simply raises the overall cost of living; “big government” (generally a Democratic view) is not a good thing except for federal government employees who want to keep thier jobs; Democrats are usually the ones who want to raise your taxes in order to support welfare issues (although the Democratic politicians want you to believe it’s the Repulicans who raise your taxes), pay attention the next time your friendly neighborhood Democrat talks about more welfare issues, where do they propose getting the money to pay for this?; and if you think it’s only the Repulican politicans who benefit from the gas price issue, you really are living in a dream world. And, although it may not work entirely as we feel it should, giving tax credits to those who control/own our businesses works better than giving it to the poor and middle class – Theory: Give the wealthy/business owners a tax credit, they, theorectically, will pass on the savings to the rest of us. Actuality: Give the poor/middle class a tax credit, the wealthy/business owners simply raise their prices to get their piece of the pie! Argue all you want about how bad Bush has been; come Nov 08 he’s history. But I sincerely doubt Obama, or Hillary for that matter, are what this country needs.

Posted by: KD | May 15, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Obama sin Cloddin, our messiah, deliverest thou us in this hour of need!

Posted by: Chiang Dong | May 15, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

pl. reject obama. yesterday evening, i had this very uncomfortable feeling- i got scared, worried. i dont’t trust obama. what radical change is he bringing? he is very sneaky.
all his anti american/shaddy associations. he has his own agenda.
i have doubts about him. pl. say no to obama.

Posted by: sweet cobra | May 15, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Way to go Dana!! Another self absorb politician thinks the world revolves around him. Change??
Although it is funny how defensive BHO is on this subject. I guess it must have struck a nerve.

Posted by: Marc | May 15, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

I noticed none of you stupid neo-cons addressed this previous post:
Some people are absolutely amazing! You Bush supporters blindly follow this idiot and believe every word that comes out of his mouth. This whole ‘War on Terrorism’ was started from events that happened on 9/11, and our government has fed us this manufactured story that anyone with a brain can see right through. How about that 16 foot wide hole in the pentagon that we are supposed to believe came from a passenger plane or how about that wtc building #7 that just ‘collapsed’ later in the afternoon but was reported by the BBC BEFORE it happened? Come on people! You cannot possibly be that naive, can you? Until THOSE questions are addressed, we cannot justify what we are doing over in Iraq!!! WAKE UP!!

Posted by: ba | May 15, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

This Quote Is the Best Remark to This Article,,,,,…
.
.
“The problem with Liberals and Democrats is that they hate it when they are put in front of a mirror that shows them who they truly are…”
.
Drock

Posted by: Drock | May 15, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

From Obama’s website! “Obama is the only major candidate who supports tough, direct presidential diplomacy with Iran without preconditions.” Sounds like Obama doesn’t know what’s on his own website, which is not suprising given the fact that he never heard Rev Wright say a negative word in 20 years of sitting through his tirades.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Not ONE left wing idiot can state that Iraq did NOT have WMD. Saddam used it on his own people, morons. He was in direct violation of numerous UN sanctions. Now go back to your useless protest, dolts.

Posted by: LeftWingerAreStupid | May 15, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Obama is an incompetent fool.

Posted by: BlueMax372 | May 15, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Doesn’t anyone read the news? Bush, speaking to the Kinesset, couldn’t possibly be speaking in reference to Israel’s attempts at appeasing the surrounding nations and peoples, which are causing them all kinds of problems!!!
It’s not about Obama or Bush, it’s about world problems. Whatever happened to loyalty to ones country and its leaders?

Posted by: burnsy | May 15, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

I agree – we don’t want Obama to give us another term of Jimmy Carter-type foreign policy. I was embarrassed to be an American when that Carter wimp was in office.

Posted by: RB | May 15, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

This commentaries confirms the 28% who support the President still believes he is always right despite the current state of the union.
Posted by: John | May 15, 2008 12:43:41 PM
Wrong John, what this shows is that we are not part of the mindless masses, like you.
I guess you are the type of individual that before he does anything in his life you make sure that it is popular, right?
Don’t forget, John, that the majority of Germans believed that WWII was justified. Don’t forget that it was a miniroty of Germans that believed that the Jews were not sub-human beings. Don’t forget that the majority of Americans, actually the world, believed at one point that slavery was good and that black people were sub-human.
Only weak minded fools live their lives according to meaningless polls.

Posted by: CJ | May 15, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

To illustrate the point, look at all of the people posting anti-muslim posts here and calling Barak a muslim. Ignorance, plain and simple. These are not Republicans, they are just the type of extremist persons who have(unfortunately for real conservatives) currently hijacked the party.
Someone hit the nail on the head above regarding Bush. Bush is not a real conservative. Ron Paul was the only true conservative running for office but he apparently isn’t pandering enough to make it into the Primaries. Guess you have to inspire hatred in the GOP to get a nomination these days.
Shame on you guys. I think the democrats should get the whitehouse this fall so maybe the GOP can start cleaning house. The religious and extremists and the mixture of both can start their own party for next time.

Posted by: Bud | May 15, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Dana Perino, you go girl. You actually say what most americans think. We are tired of the left wing media’s one sided arguments. Way to go!!!!!!

Posted by: Angie | May 15, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

BooHoo, poor Obama. This after all the hate-Bush speech we’ve heard since 2000.

Posted by: Cogs | May 15, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Don’t worry about 4 trillion dollars for in a war. The Democrats put up 4 trillion dollars to the Great Society Welfare) each and every year.

Posted by: john smith | May 15, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Obama can not be trusted behind closed doors, negotiating for who? Americans want a president that will protect them hands down. Obama is not that person. Next he will be blaming America for WWII: a ploy to distroy the black male. Get him out of here quick. Only Hillary and McCain will carry the American Torch.

Posted by: cal | May 15, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?
Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008 12:45:54 PM
______________________________________
BINGO!!! Didn’t he say North korea was the axis of evil , and must be stop .
what happen there cowboy!!!!.
reality is.. Someone whisper in Bush ears that North korea is NOT iraq, and they have thousands of missles pointed at Seoul South Korea, So if America even breaths on them .. they would light South Korea up like a christmas tree.

Posted by: ryan47 | May 15, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Why don’t Obama and Nancy Pelosi invite Iran over for tea and then sit down with them and have a knitting party. Pelosi promised and never delivered, and Obama is made of the same stuff!!!

Posted by: KPRO | May 15, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Bud,
Nice to hear a reasonable conservative Republican opinion again. I was starting to think I was the only one left. Too many reactionaries in our party lately.
The rest of you…Senator Obama is not a Muslim nor a moron. I may not agree with his policies, but I’m not going to kid myself that he is “evil.” He, like our president, is trying to do what he believes is best for our country. Your pretense otherwise is shallow and childish. Disagree with policy, take issue with plans and actions. But throwing around false accusations and insults is not constructive, and will not win elections or move our country forward.

Posted by: Jack | May 15, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Who else can negotiate with Hamas other than Barack Hussein Obama?
Barack Obama has said, ‘Wherever Barack Obama goes, automatically becomes Barack Obama Country!’
Well, Obama doesn’t even have to go to Syria ad Iran – They are already Hussein Country!

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

ba stated: “How about that 16 foot wide hole in the pentagon that we are supposed to believe came from a passenger plane or how about that wtc building #7 that just ‘collapsed’ later in the afternoon but was reported by the BBC BEFORE it happened?”
ba…you’re an idiot.
Put your tinfoil hat on and search for Sasquatch at the grassy knoll.

Posted by: Sasquatch | May 15, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Poobah: where are you getting your facts about obama??? The same source that Bush got the WMD reports from???

Posted by: Joseph007 | May 15, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

I’m a democrat and I have to agree with Bush on this one. Obama is playing his dirty games. doesnt look like new kind of politics to me.

Posted by: dem | May 15, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

McCain is not a HERO! The ones we left behind are the real heroes. Semper Fi

Posted by: Ranger | May 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?
Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008 12:45:54 PM
______________________________________
BINGO!!! Didn’t he say North korea was the axis of evil , and must be stop .
what happen there cowboy!!!!.
reality is.. Someone whisper in Bush ears that North korea is NOT iraq, and they have thousands of missles pointed at Seoul South Korea, So if America even breaths on them .. They would light South Korea up like a christmas tree.
-

Posted by: ryan47 | May 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Could the Dems possibly be any more immature and childish in their response to something Bush has said over and over again in the past?!? They must be looking for some more funds from their radical, anti-American base.

Posted by: davenp35 | May 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Senator Obama should welcome any criticism from Bush or Cheney, as most Americans are keenly aware that this administration has been totally incompetent and untrustworthy from the first day in office. In fact, the attitude of Americans towards the Republican party in general should be- Fool me once (2000), shame on you- fool me twice (2004), shame on me- fool me 3 times (2008), then somebody just take a gun and blow my brains out, cause I’m too damn stupid to be alive anyway!

Posted by: Ed | May 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Where is Bin Laden and all this fuss.We are talking all the talk, yet this terrorist has been free for nearly eight years and instead have lost over 4000 nice, brave and well equipped soldiers. Where is Bin Laden, I am deeply concern.

Posted by: Deeply concern | May 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

We let Mohammed Atta into our country and walk thru our airports and onto our airplanes…
Now, we let Barack Hussein Obama into the White House?
Our pre-9/11 mentality has to come to an end!
Vote McCain ’08!

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Oh you liberal’s those comments are right on! Truth hurts doesn’t it.
All of the economy problems are due to liberal policies that are short term fixes that do not have any long term thought. Government is not the answer, free markets and capitalism are.
Stop your whinning and pointing fingers!

Posted by: chris | May 15, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Posted by: Jack | May 15, 2008 12:53:34 PM
================
Senator Obama is not a Muslim ===May be. But the fact remains he was born to a muslim, has several blood relatives including his own brother who is a muslim. What’s wrong with raising that issue?
nor a moron. ===hmmm. not sure.

Posted by: dem | May 15, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Golly, imagine how incensed the Dumbocraps will be when the realize they picked a LOSER (again) Get ready for POTUS McCain.

Posted by: yomama | May 15, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Poobah:
You said senator Obama received early Islamic training….and you wrote his middle name obviously to make a point….
Based on what you wrote, it appears to me that senator Barack Obama is uniquely qualified to be president….
Please never forget this: Muslims are part of the world community…..If this world does not learn to get along with all ethnic and racially diversed people, then darkness will continue to rule the minds of the same…
By the way, senator Obama is now a Christian……Isn’t that wonderful? You should be praising the Lord instead of writing stupid stuff…

Posted by: tony | May 15, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I don’t see a way of winning this war….The only way to win, I believe , is to destroy the religion….Which is pratically an impossible task…..Talking to them would be like asking a christian not to believe in Jesus……It’s not going to happing….and they want to fight, they think they are doing “Gods” will…..If we left, they will just bring the fight to us again unless we become a nation of Islam……These radical groups are growing larger everyday, like a desiese….I mean this was going to happen eventually, whether Bush wanted it or not…..Their numbers are probably growing stronger here in the US as well….I honestly do not think there is ANY solution to stoping this war unless you just hurl a few nukes over there….We are destroying that country bit by bit anyway…..But if we did that, we would be killing the innocents as well……Basically, talking is pointless and fighting is just wasting lives and money….There really isn’t anyway out of this…..Even if you kill Bin Laden, a few hundred more will pop up in his place.

Posted by: Stephen | May 15, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

One of the missed points is that Iran is a theocracy not a democracy. Allah is the ultimate say. To a Jihad crazed leader, there is no contradiction between appeasing talk and agressive action ie. nuclear arms pointed at sworn enemies. The Jihadists Muslim faith, will not stop until the entire world is converted or killed, starting with the Jewish faith(and people)in Isreal. We are not dealing with a culture that differentiates between truth and falsehood when it comes to word and action. There is no negotiation because there is no common agreement in the meaning of words. Eastern logic is not Western logic.

Posted by: Peter | May 15, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Bush is a hypocrite and moron of the first order! His irresponsible statements shows he will say anything to deflect attention away from the mess he created while President. In 7 years and 5 months this jerk has driven the country into the ground. The stench is unberarable, this piece of crap needs to get flushed down the toilet…

Posted by: Whcjr | May 15, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

That is awesome. Bush is right on the money and all the fools whining about it are merely incriminating themselves.

Posted by: Leonard | May 15, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

One of the missed points is that Iran is a theocracy not a democracy. Allah is the ultimate say. To a Jihad crazed leader, there is no contradiction between appeasing talk and agressive action ie. nuclear arms pointed at sworn enemies. The Jihadists Muslim faith, will not stop until the entire world is converted or killed, starting with the Jewish faith(and people)in Isreal. We are not dealing with a culture that differentiates between truth and falsehood when it comes to word and action. There is no negotiation because there is no common agreement in the meaning of words. Eastern logic is not Western logic.

Posted by: Peter | May 15, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Tina,
You say if Barack is elected terrorist may take our airplanes and fly into buildings and kill people. Funny, it sounds EXACTLY LIKE what happened when BUSH was annointed (elections being beside the point to die-hard Republicans (unless of course it concerns Dems in Fl. or MI.). PLEAZZZZZZZZZZZZZe

Posted by: shelgirl | May 15, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Good for Bush. First time in a long time I’ve been happy with him. He is spot on with his statement, and the Good Lord be with us this next election, cause we have slim pickings…on both sides.
But Bush is so right on his comments about appeasers. These are the same people who would expel a child from school for standing up to the bully and punching him in the the nose. And giving the bully counseling and an apology. No wonder we’ve become a nation of wimps.
Go George!

Posted by: Dea | May 15, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Good for Bush. First time in a long time I’ve been happy with him. He is spot on with his statement, and the Good Lord be with us this next election, cause we have slim pickings…on both sides.
But Bush is so right on his comments about appeasers. These are the same people who would expel a child from school for standing up to the bully and punching him in the the nose. And giving the bully counseling and an apology. No wonder we’ve become a nation of wimps.
Go George!

Posted by: Dea | May 15, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Ranger the dumbass said,
“McCain is not a HERO! The ones we left behind are the real heroes.”
McCain never claimed to be a hero, but
he was in a POW camp for 5 1/2 years and that counts for something, boy.

Posted by: Scott E. | May 15, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Hi Guys,
Obama is right.
There are 57 contests (primaries/caucauses).
51 State Contests (49 States & 2 in Texas)
6 Other Contests
American Samoa
Democrats Abroad
District of Columbia
Guam
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
So, who is the idiot now?
Steve_NJ

Posted by: Steve_NJ | May 15, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Obama is a pansy and the last thing this country needs at this time, is a liberal for a President… I cannot stand Hillary, but she’d be 10-times better than Barack Hussein Obama!

Posted by: Morty Flannagan | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Bush has engaged in precisely what he accuses the Democrats of doing–cutting and running. When he left Afghanistan without Obama’s head on a platter, he ran away from the fight. And lest anyone think this is a far leftie post, I’m a lifelong Republican disgusted at what Bush has done to my party.

Posted by: SE se | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!!!!!

Posted by: ba | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Sometimes, when you throw a rock in the middle of a pack of dogs, the one who squeals the loudest is the one who got hit.

Posted by: Glen | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Mr. Obama:
Mr. Bush did NOT single you out for criticism. Thus there was no need for you to jump to your own defense.
Unless you think there is reason for people that still care about the well-being of Americans in the fight against terrorism to suspect your long-held stand can be interpreted as appeasement.
Your long-held stand for direct engagement with any and all enemies of the United States regardless of their origin is widely known. Instead of trying to gain political points at the expense of the President of whom I am never a fan of when his words were appreciated by the Israelis who are celebrating their 60 years as a democratic force in that troublesome region, you might well be advised to clarify your own view of the world that anybody and everybody can be won over by your words.
Even though you and your long-term friends among whom are Messr. Wright and Ayers tell God to damn the U.S. of KKK-A. A week after you said you could no more disown your spiritual mentor that was your connection to God for 20 years than you could disown your “typical white” Grandma whose many acts of deepest love for you included sending you to that prep school in Hawaii which none of millions of single mothers could afford to do, you said you had disowned your gateway to God.
To many of us who still respect your Grandma in spite of you, we are left speechless seeing a decent-hearted lady in her later stage of life in a care facility being thrown swiftly under the 20-wheeler before she could defend herself.
God help us if you are elected. We are not afraid we ourselves will be thrown under the truck, but we are concerned about our country’s future. It will be the future of America that will be summarily destroyed after its over 230 years of not entirely glorified but nonetheless awe-inspiring history.

Posted by: Brent | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

The funny thing is the President did not accuse anyone specific of anything. He spoke out about a practice in general terms. Who is politcizing it by making it a direct political attack? I think Obama and Pelosi may be protesting a bit to loudly, perhaps feeling a bit guilty over something?

Posted by: JustAsking | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Bush is an imbecille and needs to go away…

Posted by: LOU ALLAN | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Barak Obama is not a black man technically. He is only half black. However, he was raised as a Muslim and his wife hates our country. His name alone is a slap in the face to all of our troops overseas.

Posted by: Nikki | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Listen to the Obamabots like Pelsoi, Biden,and Kerry in the DNC go insane. Nominate Clinton before it’s too late!!!!!
Donna Brazille’s New Obama controlled Deomcratic Party is the party of appeasement and anti-Israel.

Posted by: geevill | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Bush used appeasement in his arguments for going into Iraq- Not ‘appeasing’ Saddam Hussein certainly paid off didn’t it!
I don’t think Obama ever said you should give into every demand a rogue leader makes, but at the same time there is value in talking to foreign leaders and only going to war as an absolute final thing. After all thats usually the American way!

Posted by: markymark | May 15, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

You can not blame congress if it was fed with fabricated information from Bush’s cabinet. The fact is that even though Congress is partially to blame for the war in Iraq, the onus of the war in Iraq, and the exponential spread of terrorism lies with Mr. Bush and his cabinet. Mr. Bush should be judge by his merits and his flaw equally. His merits are mainly tax cuts, however his flaws are indirect taxes on the American public; Trillions of dollars on the war with Iraq, a $3-$5 Trillion dollar decline in Real Estate values, close to a Trillion dollar write off by the banks, oil prices that have gone from $26 to $126 and rising, a US that is stratigically overstretch in military terms and an economy that looks very bleak for the next 5 years, yes at least 5 years. I don’t envy whom ever becomes the next president, all I can say is to keep our fingers crossed and pray for the best. We will survive, however we should learn from our past and make sure we never elect another Baffoon like Mr. Bush.

Posted by: Christian | May 15, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

I have no reservations in believing that if put in a compromising situation that required him to choose between standing up for America and our allies or wringing his hands and engaging in childish banter, hoping that as time passed the wind will bring some good tidings, Obama would repeat the same mistakes of prior liberals and socialists. Give the enemy time to prepare for your demise while you carry on. You can no more talk down conflict with your enemies, and Iran is our enemy, that you can politely and peaceful negotiate with a home invader to spare your family. The criminal mind, the terrorist mind, and their ilk only understand violence. The one and only deterrent is strength and the ability and WILL to use it. Liberals will never learn, because somewhere in their being is a fatal flaw that refuses to acknowledge that EVIL exists and must be confronted with POWER. Sure liberals will get made a conservatives for making such statements, because it is far easier to go about muttering about direct talk instead of changing. The world remains as it has always been. Liberals refuses to concede that not everyone WANTS to get along. Obama is just another face in a long line of fools.

Posted by: TexasTrails | May 15, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Obama rewrites history and leaves out Bill Clinton as a president. He just pretends the 90′s never happened so he doesnt have to say the word Clinton.

Posted by: lynda | May 15, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Obama was smarter than Bush when he was in the 5th grade.

Posted by: LOU ALLAN | May 15, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

When terrorist drop the Washington monument into a pile of rubble, B. H. Obama can have them over for tea to discuss not doing it again. Doesn’t anybody remember our great savior in 1976? That turned well didn’t it. The only reason these fools want to get out of Iraq is to spend that money on social give aways so they can stay in power. They have no clue as to the end result of doing so.

Posted by: Bud | May 15, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Gee….is it right for a guy who isn’t sure how many states make up the USA to question the president’s citation of historical fact?

Posted by: Mobydubido | May 15, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

I hate it when Bush is right. But in this case he is correct.

Posted by: jim koepke | May 15, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

This Quote Is the Best Remark to This Article,,,,,…
.
.
“The problem with Liberals and Democrats is that they hate it when they are put in front of a mirror that shows them who they truly are…”
.
Drock
Why are Pelosi, Obama, Kerry, Biden, etc outraged by this comment?
President Bush did not name one person, he just made a comment and the Liberals are going crazy…HAHAHA!!
The reason Obama, Pelosi, etc took it personal is because they know who they are…appeasers.

Posted by: CJ | May 15, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Could some of the smart democrats point out where there have been successes in talking with aggressors to get them to stop without using the threat of military action? Those that come to mind suggest just the opposite. Talk-fail-loose.
-Robert Smith
Mr. Smith,
Didn’t Ronald Reagan have success in talking to aggressors? All wars end with diplomacy Sir; or we all die.

Posted by: Tony | May 15, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Most of you republican racist re so uninformed or unaware of the contributions islam brought to the world – Europe and the West/US. Read about how the Moors/Muslims of Spain excelled in all realms of knowledge from math, science, atrology, medicine etc. and brought your European ancestors out of the dark ages, who didn’t even know how to wash their aXX. Why do we call the numbers we use Arabic numerals? Often a culture deomonizes one that it borrowed or stole a great deal from. Catholics/Christians killed and enslaved these Moors during the Spainish inquisition. The indian helped the Christian pilgrim and the pilgrim killed him. Remember it was & is the so called white supremist Christians who practice(d)systemic racism and discrimination in the US against the natives and blacks. I understand it was a so called Christian america that believed they were justified in the Bible to enslave blacks; that formed the KKK; that instituted Jim Crow laws; sicked dogs and turned on fire hydrants on black students & civil rights workers, the list goes on. After reading some of the posts I can’t help but believe or wonder whether some of you people still agree with the views of the history I’ve just mentioned. I’ll assume Christians today don’t read the same Bible. The majority of crime committed in U.S. is done by people with “Christian” values up bringing, not Muslim, so be a little more critical of self.

Posted by: Dham629 | May 15, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Could some of the smart democrats point out where there have been successes in talking with aggressors to get them to stop without using the threat of military action? Those that come to mind suggest just the opposite. Talk-fail-loose.
-Robert Smith
Mr. Smith,
Didn’t Ronald Reagan have success in talking to aggressors? All wars end with diplomacy Sir; or we all die.

Posted by: Tony | May 15, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Interesting that all who say we should not talk to a country that exports terrorism, like Iran. What are we doing with North Korea? Anybody hear of Khadafi and negotiating with them?

Posted by: RJ | May 15, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Jack,
Thanks for the comments. It’s good to hear some reason and sense from another conservative too!

Posted by: Bud | May 15, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

One of Obama’s strengths is that he’s emotionally sensitive. One of Obama’s weaknesses is that he’s emotionally sensitive.
He can give an inspiring speech, but he can also have a thin skin. In this case, it seems that he overreacted out of the mistaken perception that President Bush’s comments were directed at him.
Would this kind of thin skin make him more effective, or less effective, in the role of commander-in-chief?

Posted by: Michael in Great Plains | May 15, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

So let me get this straight…
“Bush Lied, People Died”
“The last 8 years have been hell on earth”
“Bush is Satan”
So when Bush says, “Appeasement is not the answer,” it is “Beneath the office”
Hypocracy knows no bounds.
Har Har!

Posted by: Lord Har Har | May 15, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

That’s a good observation. Either this is because of his egomania (he thinks he is already the nominee) or because his consceince is guilty. In any case, Obama presidency ( Hope Not) would be dream come true for Hamas.

Posted by: dem | May 15, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

wow, even Bush’s daughter Jenna isn’t voting for Mccain.

Posted by: jenna | May 15, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Ummmm… someone has to remind Obama about Reagan… how much “talking” and “diplomacy” did he use against Kaddaffi? Remember Obama? Dimplomacy came in the form of an airstrike on the little terrorist leader’s house!

Posted by: Scott | May 15, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Wow, look at this blog! It really brought all the neocon cockroaches out of the woodwork!

Posted by: Ron | May 15, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Obama’s 57 states comments, and his comments on how Afganistan needs Arabic translators and we are currently short of those translators and that is the hurdle to success there — how laughable these are? Is this a better pres than Bush?
New evidence is surfacing showing Obama has known Wright’s political positions all along. Yet he tolerated, said nothing, sat in the pew for 20 years. I can’t imagine having him in WH does good to America.

Posted by: Amy | May 15, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Why are Obama and the Democratic party leadership going bonkers over the President’s remarks? Because he struck a nerve. By their reaction, they identify themselves as the very people he characterized. Appeasers.

Posted by: TexasTrails | May 15, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Obama’s reaction is very interesting. He finally admits to the role of Republican Presidents in reigning in an expansive Soviet policy over the decades following World War II:
“Instead of tough talk and no action, we need to do what Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan did and use all elements of American power — including tough, principled, and direct diplomacy – to pressure countries like Iran and Syria.”
The last time he got into a kerfuffle over this appeasement issue, he included Roosevelt and Truman as examples of those who “negotiated” first, and he did not mention either Reagan or Nixon. Obviously, he was trying to make a political issue out of it — suggesting that Democrats are the ones who negotiate.
Apparently, however, someone pulled young Barry aside and whispered to him that neither Franklin Roosevelt nor Harry Truman went begging, hat in hand, to Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, or, later, to the lunatics in North Korea.
And, when both Roosevelt and Truman did negotiate post-war to carve up Europe with our emerging adversary, the Soviet Union (at Teheran and Potsdam), they unfortunately gave away the store, by ceding all of Eastern Europe to Stalin.
We can ill afford to have someone occupying the presidency with little or no knowledge of modern history, and a partisan inclination that is constantly belied by the plain facts.
George Bush is exactly right on this. And Mitt Romney had the best reaction as to who this was aimed at. He said it reminded him of the old line that when you throw a rock over the fence, the dog that yelps loudest, is usually the one that was hit. Barry just got clipped and is really squawking!

Posted by: Trochilus | May 15, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Dimocrats! They just keep on giving.
Thank you Dims.

Posted by: zqll | May 15, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Netflix Winds of War for a refresher on how poorly the appeasement approach worked and how Jewish people suffered terribley as a direct result. We must never forget the lessons history teaches us. Funny how Obama automatically assumed the comment was about him. Quite an egocentric type he is.

Posted by: ObamaNOT | May 15, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Yeah, as if Bush’s cowboy diplomacy has been beneficial to either the US or the world. Please. This is the LAST person who should be giving anyone foreign policy advice.
The way to defeat the extremists is to open their countries up. You defeat Ahmadinejad by supporting the pro-democracy and pro-freedom groups within Iran. You stand on the side of justice and freedom. You undermine the radicals, you don’t HELP them by saber-rattling and launching invasions.
Even our Defense Secretary Gates knows this, and wants to talk with Iran. Nixon knew this, which is why he visited and opened up China. Reagan knew this when he had talks with the old Soviet Union. That was how we undermined the Soviets, by supporting the pro-democracy and free market supporters within the Soviet Union. We then opened up the old Warsaw Pact nations and made them our allies with democratic governments.
Bush TALKS about Iraq being about spreading democracy in the region, but then he undermines democracy. Bush TALKS about not speaking with undemocratic totalitarians, but then he allies with Musharraf in Pakistan, or the Saudi royals.

Posted by: Brian in FL | May 15, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

-82% of Americans think we are on the wrong track
-Bush approval rating at lowest for any President
-Majority of Americans think going into Iraq was mistake
McCain supports Bush domestic and foreign policies…Yeah right, like I am going to vote for McCain!
Vote Obama, the only one in the race who was against a wholesale invasion of Iraq (under false pretenses from Bush)and FOR seriously going after the 9/11 terrorists in Afghanistan, Pakistan and wherever neceesary!!!

Posted by: miles1967 | May 15, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Daryl,
EXACTLY. This is typical for the Obama camPAIN, whenever someone makes a true statement, they change the subject and accuse the person who said it either of being part of ‘politics as usual,’ or they accuse them of racism. Passive-aggressive tactics ensure that no one wins. And I happen to think that Obama and his ‘followers’ are very much like Hitler and the mania that surrounded him.

Posted by: CoffeeAlert | May 15, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

If we had Nixon we surely would not be in this mess that Mr. Baffoon has brought upon the American people. Nixon had vision and he understood the merits of diplomacy backed by military strength, not military strength backed by diplomacy. This is the Republican way not the Baffoon idiology of Mr. Bush. Being diplomatic is very different to placating your adversaries. Unfortunately the Republican party today has been hijacked by a vociferous few that continue to mislead our nation down a very bleak path. More Republicans need to stand up and speak their minds than blindly support a fellow Republican that has a brain as thin as a lady’s hymen. I can’t wait until the Baffoon is kicked out of office, he has embarrassed our nation beyond anything I could imagined. Please God get rid of Mr. Bush before he destroys this world.

Posted by: Christian | May 15, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Up until 5 months ago, I would have agreed with anyone stating that Bush was a terrible president. Then came obama. After listening to him, his campaign and his followers, I will absolutely never vote for him and I believe that G.W. Bush in the long run, is a good president. He has kept THE TERRORISTS FROM FURTHER ATTACKING THE USA. He has kept North Korea and Russia from becoming too powerful, he has kept the Middle East from our doors. He is right in keeping our troops in Iraq, not that I agree we should have EVER gone there, but I agree that our presence has to be kept there. If we withdraw our troops, Iran goes in, and that is not a good idea. At least G.W. is keeping Iran from attacking the USA again.
The obama followers on these threads that think he is the second coming and chosen by God himself, are very delusional. It’s always frightening when a cult has been created and those cult followers show the fanatic side that will do anything for their cult leader. We need to be very careful when dealing with these fanatics.
Bush was correct in his address to Israel – obama really does think the world revolves around him. He really is very much in-love with himself. I’ll just bet the mirror he keeps in his pocket is on a 24 hour long standby. Maybe one of his religious fanatics can purchase him a new one – you know, the one with a Jesus figure, but the face of obama. You might want to have some T-shirts made up like this.

Posted by: Lou | May 15, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

what an accurate statement. it’s about time Bush said it like it is. Hussein Obama will apease Iran and eventually bow to their wishes. of course that’s what fellow muslims will do.

Posted by: joe | May 15, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Bush used appeasement in his arguments for going into Iraq- Not ‘appeasing’ Saddam Hussein certainly paid off didn’t it!
I don’t think Obama ever said you should give into every demand a rogue leader makes, but at the same time there is value in talking to foreign leaders and only going to war as an absolute final thing. After all thats usually the American way!
Posted by: markymark | May 15, 2008 1:02:52 PM
Markymark,
Are you serious? I am sure that you are aware that Obama’s top foreign advisor was fired just a few days ago after the media learned and informed the world that Obama staffers and foreign advisors were talking and speaking with Hamas! WOW!!
Obama not only has said he will talk to terrorists, he is already doing it!
Obama is a left wing radical, associated with such pigs as William Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn.
As for your comment about Iraq….do you know any American history? How long did it take the USA to become a nation, a working nation from the beginning of the American Revolution?
the problem with the Obamabots is that they are 100% poorly educated. They are elites fools who think that because they may have a college degree or some education that they are smart. By supporting Obama they prove how poorly educated they are. By not seeing the lies that Obama speaks about history, they prove how poorly educated they are.
How many Obamabots know that Obama lied when he said that FDR, Harry Truman and JFK spoke directly with America’s enemies? how many of you mindless Obamabots who applauded him after he said this know that he lied? ZERO!
how sad, how truly sad.

Posted by: CJ | May 15, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad? – Geldo
There is a bit of a difference between talking with communist N. Korea and Iran. Kim Jong Il is posturing before his people as they are extremely poor and this is his way of getting more aid. He has a pattern of actions and a need that can be fulfilled. Iran does not.

Posted by: abe frohman | May 15, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

George Bush did not bankrupt this country… We the people did it, by
buying things you couldn’t afford, by borrowing money just because
someone said they would lend it to you. Racking up your credit
card knowing darn well the interest would eat you alive…
American’s need to take responsibily for their own foolish mistakes
and put the blame where it belongs and stop expecting everyone
else to bail you out……….. Obama is a fool to think he can negotiate
with our enemy. As they saying goes, keep your enemies close,
You don’t make friends with evil…! You just keep an eye on their
every move. They will be the first to call you an infidel because you
were stupid enough to shake their hand and make nice, “As though
they had changed their mind about killing you. They want Americans
dead, they want our land and riches. The religion tells them its okay
to lie to get what they want…

Posted by: Silly | May 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Don’t get mad a Bush for what he says, he’s just trying to please his bosses at the Knesset.
He’s nothing but a puppet for the neocons. Just pull the strings and he speaks.
What a tool!

Posted by: Realist | May 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

George Bush did not bankrupt this country… We the people did it, by
buying things you couldn’t afford, by borrowing money just because
someone said they would lend it to you. Racking up your credit
card knowing darn well the interest would eat you alive…
American’s need to take responsibily for their own foolish mistakes
and put the blame where it belongs and stop expecting everyone
else to bail you out……….. Obama is a fool to think he can negotiate
with our enemy. As they saying goes, keep your enemies close,
You don’t make friends with evil…! You just keep an eye on their
every move. They will be the first to call you an infidel because you
were stupid enough to shake their hand and make nice, “As though
they had changed their mind about killing you. They want Americans
dead, they want our land and riches. The religion tells them its okay
to lie to get what they want…

Posted by: Silly | May 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

After reading many of these responses it’s becoming very clear to me that the American Psychiatric Association needs to have a symposium on “Bush Derangement Syndrome.” Some of these rantings show signs of individuals on the verge of an almost complete mental breakdown. Let’s face it, if your lives are so miserable it’s probably no one else’s fault but your own.

Posted by: Jimbo | May 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Bush and Cheney have done several things wrong. This is no excuse to vote for Obama the president. He is not only dumb, arrogantly dumb. While he may not be a muslim NOW, he is lying through his teeth when he pretends he has no Islamic heritage.

Posted by: dem | May 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

I guess you guys don’t mind if the pilot’s wife is flying the plane you get on instead of the pilot…

Posted by: Tuck28 | May 15, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Senator Obama did say he was going to sit and talk with the President of Iran.

Posted by: Angelo | May 15, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Let’s weigh who is appeasing who? We have deliberately failed to catch Bin Laden because, if we do, we would be paying $100 per gallon at the pump and therefore appease us with “Stimulus Package” to graze safely.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

President Bush has every right to make the statement he did. It’s a great historical perspective our country would be well served to contemplate. The protests of Obama, Pelosi and the other Dems show they can’t handle hearing the truth about their own weaknesses, only lashing out and attacking others. Way to go President Bush! Not all Americans have lost their minds, or spines.

Posted by: Marilyn | May 15, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

I refuse to allow left wingers to ruin the United States. If you hate America, move to Iran.

Posted by: LeftWingHater | May 15, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

It is a bit funny that when a comment is made in general about appeasing terrorists that a presidential candidate would jump up and say “hey your talking about me”. Smart really smart…

Posted by: JustAsking | May 15, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Someone on this made a good point about Fox News and Obama. I have said the same thing about the Democrats about not doing a debate on Fox News since they were bias. My problem w/ that is that if your avoiding people in your own country to do debates how am I suppose to believe that you’ll talk to any leader in the world. Aren’t they also bias toward the US? Oh well, Americans keep going blind to real issues and Obama is about a Mile Wide and an Inch deep. I feel sorry for all of us because there is no one left that has the best interest in the country or it’s people. It’s becoming the time that the people are to take back whats theres. The biggest form of gov’t in our country is suppose to be the people, then local, then state and last federal. Now it’s in reverse order…doesn’t it look like a communist form of gov’t or very socialistic….we’re screwed if we don’t act.

Posted by: Kimball | May 15, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Of course obama is soft of terror. He was raised Muslim. Posted by: dont be sill———————————-You should change your name to:Dont be an ignorant moron. He was raised CHRISTIAN and went to a CHRISTIAN school. I see the education system has failed you too.

Posted by: jpmbz | May 15, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

ANY US OFFICIAL, Military Officer, USSC Judge or party hack, Cheney or below, who said what Bush just said in Israel would be out of job before the wells touched down on US soil. It is time to FIRE this jerk and MOVE ON.

Posted by: TJ | May 15, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

This is just more reasons why Hamas (the terrorists organization for those who don’t know) is supporting Obama.
Think about when the last time the US was attacked. Watch what will happen if the Marxist gets elected.

Posted by: John Smyth | May 15, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Amy you are an idiot…..When we lose our country to China and other foreigner who are buying america and they turn all of us into a dictatorship we will see who have the last laugh…if you do not wish to vote for Senator Obama, this is fine; but to say things as nasty as I have been reading on this blogs is so sad….Bill Gates do not have enough money for me to run for the president of the united states. Everyone true colors are showing…Racism is still here in american and is growing stronger. Go Obama Go……..

Posted by: Della | May 15, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

“the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.” This is a factual statement and I don’t believe it was directed at Senator Obama. Why shouldn’t the president be allowed to speak the truth? The current world situation is far to critical to worry about being PC just because it does not set well with Obama and his Muslem family and friends. Everything Obama stands for is radical and contrary to the best interests of America

Posted by: Tekrab | May 15, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Let’s make the Liberals out here happy. I’m all for passing out big bowls of rainbow stew and plenty of free bubble up coolaid. After they’re doing with the stew and the coolaid, we’ll organize a little sortie where they form a big circle, hold hands and sing kum-ba-yah. While they are having their whine and dine fest, the rest of us can go about be doers and achievers.
Talk is cheap. Action produces results.

Posted by: TexasTrails | May 15, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

It’s called political Jiu-Jitsu and Obama is becoming a master at it. The GOP is rolling out different stratigies and ploys to test Obama’s weeknesses. Obama uses Bush’s own quotes against him. This is also the most effective way to combat swift-boating.

Posted by: Radmanaustin | May 15, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Did Bush say anything false? NO.
Did Obama offer to negotiate with terrorists? YES.
Did Obama propose the military invasion of Pakistan? YES.
Did Obama’s foreign policy adviser Samantha Strong propose the military invasion of Israel? YES.
Did Obama condemn Carter’s disastrous meeting with Hamas? NO.
And Pelosi, of course, gave the standard Democrat response: shrill, irrational, psychotic, foam-at-the-mouth screaming hatred.

Posted by: Brad | May 15, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

I think Prince Obama doth protest too much – Negotiation may have it’s place, but Iran makes weekly statements hinting that they want to utterly destroy Israel. Obama is a Bambi in the woods and has no idea what lunatics he would be dealing with if he became President. He is the new Jimmy Carter but without the resume !

Posted by: Tom Chicago | May 15, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Thou dost protest too much Barak? No names are mentioned, why does Barak think the president is speaking of him? Guilt ridden Barak, or are you so self important that the president speaks about you only? Do you think the president isn’t big enough to call you out by name. Barak, get off your high horse, you have alot of other things to worry about, like your wife’s comments, your falsehoods and the people you associate with and then lie about? The fact that you blame everyone in the world for your errors in the campaign, when are you taking responsibility for your actions? Such a selfserving primodona. How do you get thru the door with such a swell head?

Posted by: Linda | May 15, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

“Democrats OBSESSION with Barak Obama” is “DUE TO GLOBAL WARMING”. LETS ALL VOTE FOR AL GORE FOR PRESIDENT, AND REV. WRIGHT FOR V.P.

Posted by: Bob | May 15, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

wow…looks like a lot of you have lost your bearings as well.

Posted by: shane | May 15, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Gates is talking to Iran. you must talk some. Bush is trying help get is 3rd term election and help McBush win!! Vote Obama!!!

Posted by: Teri | May 15, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Voting for Obama,
See, don’t play the extremist game too. “Whoever feels proud to have voted for Bush twice is a traitor to this country and they should be put on trial for treason along with their families.”
Thats just nonsensical absolutism. Bush and his admin sold themselves as something other than they are. A lot of people voted for him because they didn’t like the competition (I didn’t like Kerry).
My sister even voted for him “again” because she thought he made the mess and should fix it. (You broke it you buy it).
Don’t get caught up in the wave of political psychosis. Keep your feet on the ground.
Best,
Bud

Posted by: Bud | May 15, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Voting for Obama,
See, don’t play the extremist game too. “Whoever feels proud to have voted for Bush twice is a traitor to this country and they should be put on trial for treason along with their families.”
Thats just nonsensical absolutism. Bush and his admin sold themselves as something other than they are. A lot of people voted for him because they didn’t like the competition (I didn’t like Kerry).
My sister even voted for him “again” because she thought he made the mess and should fix it. (You broke it you buy it).
Don’t get caught up in the wave of political psychosis. Keep your feet on the ground.
Best,
Bud

Posted by: Bud | May 15, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Obama’s response seems paranoid to me. If anyone in particular was on Bush’s mind, it would be Carter, I would think.

Posted by: Carl Thomsen | May 15, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Listen to these fools assert that Bush is responsible for a Hurricane and 5.00 gas. Bush has been pushing domestic oil and gas exploration and refinery capacity for years. Decades of liberal intransigence, unable to compromise their environmental extremism so we may have a sound energy policy. These same groups even oppose nuclear energy which is abundant and as clean as they come.

Posted by: Brad | May 15, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Ouch!
A conservative called me a moron.
Oh… the pain!!!
Face it – Bush has had over 5 years, a couple trillion dollars (that he’ll never acknowledge has to be paid back through taxes), and the full US military behind him – and he could do no better than to lead us into a swamp in Iraq with no way of getting out!
Then, his wannabee successor John McBush, has the cojones to tell the American people that by the end of his first administration he’s going to have captured Osama bin Laden. Yeah… like Bush hasn’t been trying.
So who’s the moron? Bush, McCain, or the one or 2 people left in the country who believe either of them?

Posted by: charles sobieski | May 15, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Question for you Ryno,
Just how long a period of time did the US and the UN give Saddam to comply with the resolutions? 14 years I believe? Hardy a shoot first.
And another question for the lefties,
Why is it that you all think you can talk your way out of a problem?

Posted by: Brian G | May 15, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Question for you Ryno,
Just how long a period of time did the US and the UN give Saddam to comply with the resolutions? 14 years I believe? Hardy a shoot first.
And another question for the lefties,
Why is it that you all think you can talk your way out of a problem?

Posted by: Brian G | May 15, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

God help us.
It is staggering to believe that there are people who do not realize that as Teddy Roosevelt said “Walk softly, but carry a big stick.” Those of you in LA LA land had better open their eyes and look around. There are a bunch of crazy religious radicals out there who want nothing more than to destroy our country. Yes, there is a lot wrong with this country, but without this country we all would be praying to the east, and those who relish in the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etcetera will rue the day someone like Obama get elected. Yes, talk to our enemy’s, but have that big stick ready. If as proposed all the social programs, welfare and other do gooder cra* is enacted, there will not be money for the big stick. Bill Clinton slighted the military, spent money on excessive social spending and undercut the military so they could barley do their mission. That is to say, attempt to keep us and our loved ones safe. Anyone who paid attention, which apparently Obama supporters lack the ability to do, had better listen to where he wants to spend the money, and its not on the military.
So, let’s all keep our heads in the sand and continue down the rosy garden path of love and peace just like in the 1970’s, and see where we end up.
Can’t stand McCain, but at least he’s got his head far enough out of where the sun doesn’t shine to realize that you don’t deal with the religious Islamic radicals with peace and love, all they understand is the big stick. It’s your choice people, think of your kids or grand kids. What kind of country do you want them living in? One where they can freely express themselves, have enough to eat, go to school (note the Talban disbanded the girls schools, all you women libbers) and lead happy productive lives, or do you want them living in a world dominated by the Islamic radicals who enjoy cutting of heads with swords. Your choice.

Posted by: Bryce | May 15, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

For the superdelegates to end this, and vote against the candidate who:
- has links to organized crime and terrorism;
- is endorsed by both the KKK *and* Hamas;
- has taken a bribe to change a vote;
- voted for Cheney’s Energy Bill (a giveaway to the oil companies);
- praises the never-prosecuted-for treason (Iran-Contra) Reagan for being “accountable”;
- thinks Medicare, Medicaid, the EPA, and the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department are examples of a bloated goverment;
and FOR the only candidate who has been proven to be:
- a real progressive;
- a fighter;
- 100% ethical and honest;
- able to throw punches;
- able to take them;
- the candidate who can actually WIN in the general election.
In other words…
…AGAINST Obama, and FOR Hillary.

Posted by: Melanie | May 15, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

amy said “if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.”
Amy…shut the fu(k up.

Posted by: IhateAmy | May 15, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

‘Me thinks Obama protesteth too much.’ He must identify with what Bush said or else he wouldn’t make such a huge issue out of it.
BTW .. note to Obama. Bush is not running this time, so get off his case!

Posted by: andi | May 15, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

we have already lost our country to china…without them we wouldn’t have any of the things we do now. look at where they’re all made. CHina.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Methinks Obama doth protest too much.

Posted by: DaveS | May 15, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

I think the President was right on. Winston Churchill wrote a six book history on WWII. My favorite book in that series is “The Gathering Storm”, telling the events that lead up to the rise of Nazi Germany and ultimately 1939. Read this book and you will understand the parallels and why the sort of positions and talke from the Dems is dangerous and wreckless.

Posted by: Michael | May 15, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Don’t underestimate Obama’s power of persuasion. He was able to buy a 1.1 million dollar house for 600,000 dollars. One sit down with Ahmandinejad and Osama and they’ll be eating out of our hands. I can’t wait, I’m so giddy, like a little school girl.

Posted by: yaquitheone | May 15, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Man oh man, I really have a hard time with some of these posters. Do you really think Barak (Mohammads Horse), Hussien (Dictator and Terrorist), Obama (worst contender since Gore… Mr internet global warming). If you Jimmy Jones swillers really think BHO will keep this Nation safe and will advance Peace in the Middle East or the World then think again. If BHO is elected as president this Nation will start a downward slide to distruction… If you want lower gas we need to refine and pump our own. To do so we need to open capped wells, drill in Alaska and off our coasts along with building new refineries. We need to double cost or quadruple the cost for all export food stuff to any country charging over 25 dollars a barrel for oil. If you want to bring down the cost of oil then play the game they play… charge them for what they need massively. They cant make money to support terrorist if they cant sale their oil… they cant afford food if they cant sale their oil. This Nation can bring oil down in cost in a short time… we just have to have the poilitical will to do so.

Posted by: RJLeffler | May 15, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Everything on God’s green earth and throughout the celestial universe is about Obama. He’s our coming Messiah and no one should question him on anything. Since at least half the nation is already bowing down in blind devotion, Obama will be the next President, er I mean, Messiah.

Posted by: Obama truth | May 15, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Does anyone here, liberal or conservative, have a clue as to what is really going on in this country? The same corporate interests that control Bush also control Hilly and OsamaObama. Neither will do anything other than what they will be told to do by thier puppetmasters. We have the best form of government money can buy! Get the film “Why we fight” and pay attention, especially if you plan to vote McCain.

Posted by: Jimbo | May 15, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

LMAO, you republicans scream WAR, and yet won’t stand up and fight for it……………. My uncle is FU((KEN fighting in your WAR and he’s doing it willingly because he supports this country, not this president.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

America’s greatness is coming to an end. We have only the liberals and those who refuse to stop them to thank. No enemy needs to come ashore, we’ve done it to ourselves. Historians a thousand years from now will be perplexed as to how we let it happen.

Posted by: PKahnPie | May 15, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

How some of you frame an argument is baffling. Our President has been our President for 7 years. In 7 years, we have gone from having money to not having money and owing everyone and their mother a ton of money. We have gone into the worst economic crises in many decades, the worst health care system in the world where the wealthy have the best, the middle class (now poor) pay more and more for less. We have gone from being the most admired nation to the most hated one. The rich has gotten more and more rich while the poor and middle class struggle every day. The country is an economic disaster, our poor soldier are asked to do more and more, paying the ultimate price for a war that is insane and has nothing to do with this country’s needs. Meanwhile, some of you thick headed people are more concerned with words spoken by pastor who has absolutely no part of the mess we are in today. And how on earth do you equate Obama’s words with the actions of this administration. Obama is not in charge now, nor has been for the last 7 years. Wake up numbskulls, hold those in charge now, not anyone who is not there yet.

Posted by: Jake | May 15, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

All the RNC will have to say regarding this is:
These are facts in the public record – SAR]
1) Auchi helped Saddam Hussein defraud the UN Oil-For-Oil Program; and
2) Despite knowing this, Obama worked hard to get the Bush administraion to give him a contract to build a power plant in Iraq , which it did, and which never got built).
And Obama will lose the GE.

Posted by: Melanie | May 15, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

charles sobieski…were you dropped on your head as a baby? Go sit on the retard bench until called or I’ll pull your tongue out of your dumbass and yoyo you to death.

Posted by: charles sobieski is an idiot | May 15, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

All you morons think that we will be attacked if Obama is elected should be put in an institution. You are living in the culture of fear mentality and you believe all the bullcrap any politician spews. All the candidates are liars. Vote independent

Posted by: jay | May 15, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Turn off your t.v. and read the constitution.

Posted by: dblis | May 15, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

LMAO, you republicans scream WAR, and yet won’t stand up and fight for it……………. My uncle is FU((KEN fighting in your WAR and he’s doing it willingly because he supports this country, not this president.
lol and than you get mad when some asks for you to step up…..Oh, yeah, like BUSH you’re going to hide behind DADDY. I forgot that’s the REPUBLICAN way.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Still like Bush? Chances are you have a pickup truck and never graduated college.
It is a fact!

Posted by: Speaking the Truth | May 15, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

How come no one is talking about Bushie’s grandad, Prescott? While head of Harriman Bank he did business with Fritz Thyssen, a major financial backer of the Nazis. W. should be more careful when he goes referencing Hitler and the Nazis.

Posted by: Smiller | May 15, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Sometimes I wonder if Im the only one paying attention. I just googled an article which detailed the use of retarded school girls used as explosive devices. I also just read of one of our former Presidents negotiating with known terrorists and Ive also viewed Mr. Hussein Obama openly stating that he intends to DISARM America and talk to Putin about nuclear weapon disarmament. Am I the only one paying attention here? Russian communists dont like blacks and will “humor” them- Hesbolah is laughing at the peanut farmer and you people are sitting here condemning a man who is doing everything to do what’s right and keep us strong. I often wonder why LOSING is priority #1 of liberals?? This entire situation makes me greatful I never had children.

Posted by: GR Popp | May 15, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Jake…you’re a fvckwit. Sit on the retard bench with Charles Sobieski.

Posted by: Jake is an idiot | May 15, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Lord – bless all reading this site today.

Posted by: realm | May 15, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.
********************************
LMAO, you republicans scream WAR, and yet won’t stand up and fight for it……………. My uncle is FU((KEN fighting in your WAR and he’s doing it willingly because he supports this country, not this president.
lol and than you get mad when some asks for you to step up…..Oh, yeah, like BUSH you’re going to hide behind DADDY. I forgot that’s the REPUBLICAN way.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Do you feel,” asked an ordinary American, “that you were misled on Iraq?”
“I feel like — I felt like, there were weapons of mass destruction,” the president said. “You know, ‘mislead’ is a strong word, it almost connotes some kind of intentional — I don’t think so, I think there was a — not only our intelligence community, but intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment. And so I was disappointed to see how flawed our intelligence was.”

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.
********************************
LMAO, you republicans scream WAR, and yet won’t stand up and fight for it……………. My uncle is FU((KEN fighting in your WAR and he’s doing it willingly because he supports this country, not this president.
lol and than you get mad when some asks for you to step up…..Oh, yeah, like BUSH you’re going to hide behind DADDY. I forgot that’s the REPUBLICAN way.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Why is everyone mad at what Bush said? In a CNN debate between Clinton & Obama, Obama clearly said that he would meet with these people like Castro with no preconditions. Hillary said she would meet but with preconditions. Washington was against Carter to go and meet Hamas for peace talking but guess what?…They just attacked Israel, so talking to terrorist without any preconditions is a total danger. Obama clearly has no foreign experience!

Posted by: Mary | May 15, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

As a european who endorses Obama’s diplomacy, i am shocked by the reaction of the majority here. America, you are no more that powerful, you are getting weaker economically and militarily in an alarming pace. Russia and china are chiping on your dominance everyday. You are on your way face the fate of the roman empire, due to wrong public mindset. It is not your president but you the people who live in your old glory which is long over. I am sure that the majority of you doesn’t even know that you are running the war with chinese cash. 2 years more, you’ll declare bancrupsy, leave alone 100 years. Napoleone had to sell Luisiana to finance his war. You might have to cede Alaska to the chinese soon. That is very much realistic and in the books. What a pity

Posted by: Samy | May 15, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.
********************************
LMAO, you republicans scream WAR, and yet won’t stand up and fight for it……………. My uncle is FU((KEN fighting in your WAR and he’s doing it willingly because he supports this country, not this president.
lol and than you get mad when some asks for you to step up…..Oh, yeah, like BUSH you’re going to hide behind DADDY. I forgot that’s the REPUBLICAN way.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Why exactly prevents Mr. Barack if he was truly wanting to differentiate himself from previous US governments who the founding fathers and mothers of Israel have never considered a “friend of the fledging Jewish State” – just look at the extraordinary arms embargo placed on Israel both prior to and during its most brutal War of Independance 1947-1949 – to simply be the first US Presidential candidate to examine why the US Government did not accede to Israel’s request to notify Israel of any of their ships anywhere near the war zone during the June 1967 Six Day War; let alone have the United States most advanced spy ship the USS Liberty be placed in harms way by none other than Senator John McCain’s father who like his father was an Admiral in the US Navy?
Shouldn’t we also look at Mr. Barack’s major funder, Mr. Tony Rezko, currently on trial for a whole host of criminal offenses including extortion; the case just going to jury the day before yesterday; not to mention that Mr. Rezko, born in Syria had just prior to the start of the trial on March 6th, been imprisoned for having received a wire transfer of $3.5 million from Lebanon?

Posted by: Gary S. Gevisser | May 15, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Would you talk to someone who has just killed your family?
Why would you talk to someone who wants to destroy an entire nation, just because he does not like them?
Sorry, can not talk to people, who can not get along with other people, just because they are different.

Posted by: Angelo | May 15, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

let me get this straight.. bill clinton, al gore, and the greag(?) jimmy carter can make speeches overseas, slamming not only a sitting president, but the united states of america before a foreign audience.. yet president bush cannot defend his policies and speak his mind.
seems one supersensitive whiny presidential candidate (the one with big earrs) gets upset at this expression of freedom of speech. what will he say as sitting president if some terrorists broadcast some insults his way (booh hoo, you cant do that, its not fair!!!) what a national embarassment osama obama is

Posted by: john remchick | May 15, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

let me get this straight.. bill clinton, al gore, and the greag(?) jimmy carter can make speeches overseas, slamming not only a sitting president, but the united states of america before a foreign audience.. yet president bush cannot defend his policies and speak his mind.
seems one supersensitive whiny presidential candidate (the one with big earrs) gets upset at this expression of freedom of speech. what will he say as sitting president if some terrorists broadcast some insults his way (booh hoo, you cant do that, its not fair!!!) what a national embarassment osama obama is

Posted by: john remchick | May 15, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

How can this country survive with a leader like Obama who refuses to confront evil? How can this country survive with a leader who espouses positions inconsistent with Godly morals?

Posted by: Gregg | May 15, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.
********************************
LMAO, you republicans scream WAR, and yet won’t stand up and fight for it……………. My uncle is FU((KEN fighting in your WAR and he’s doing it willingly because he supports this country, not this president.
lol and than you get mad when some asks for you to step up…..Oh, yeah, like BUSH you’re going to hide behind DADDY. I forgot that’s the REPUBLICAN way.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Jake – its Obama’s judgement that is being called into question, are you really this friggen stupid?
Obama = Neville Chamberlin both are spineless dumb Mother F*ckers that are foolish to believe that you can negotate with these thugs. The best way to deal with them is to kill them.

Posted by: Bob | May 15, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

What an egomanic. Bush’s comments had nothing to do with Obama. Maybe it is Obama’s guily conscience that makes him think it is about him.

Posted by: T Mack | May 15, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

This is a moot point now. The California Supreme Court has just created a distraction at an opportune time to come to Obama’s defense. Gay “marriage” is now legal in California

Posted by: Carl Thomsen | May 15, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

McCain’s son is in Iraq right now.
More than I can say about most politicians.
I love George Bush, he says it like it is.
Barak Hussein Obama is WEAK. Google this first term Senator’s voting record in the Senate. It is horrendous.
Most of the time he can’s make up his mind to vote “Yes” or “No” so he just voted “Present”. Hey Barak, “Present” is not a vote. Make up your mind and be decisive.
You people want a President that will sit down and Negotiate with terrorists as Obama has already said he WILL do without preconditions. Is that what you really want?
Read your history books, it has NEVER, EVER works. All it does is embolden the enemy.

Posted by: Cindy | May 15, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Finally, a Democratic candidate who’s going to fire back on this blustering morons.
Gore and Kerry would have come back with some weak tea respone. Obama is going to be a different kind of candidate, much to McBush’s dismay.
Time for a Change.

Posted by: fougasseu | May 15, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Obama has no experience? Before we get into that discussion, let’s talk about George Bush’s experience. Let’s see, a decade of experience sniffing cocaine, and the owner of a failed baseball team. That is quite the foreign policy resume! Give me a break.
Barack Obama has more foreign policy know how in his little finger than Bush does in his whole body. But go ahead all you neo-conservative fools. Vote for INSANE MCAIN. Mr. Flip Flop on Iraq. See where that gets you.

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Google U.S. presidents IQ’s and you find Bush is about the dumbest President this country has had. He is a person with mediocre intelligence who relied only on his family’s privilage brand name, ascended to the oval office and you see what that got us. Hell I don’t think the prospects we have at the moment could be much worse, except hot tempered senile McCain. However I do believe all are far more intelligent that G W Bush.

Posted by: Dham629 | May 15, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Satsfaction level at the lowest in history (including Carter) , a lame duck (IMO has been for 7+years), rendered totally ineffective in setting world policy by his attitude and there are still those who respect GWB ? Small numbers oviously by the disaproval rating, so we can all look beyond those folks . Diplomacy from a position of power is what is needed, but GWB is trying to undermine even that possibility in his waning days in office . What a great leader, what a great person , what a jerk ! In the absence of Ron Paul, Obama is the only logical choice from the “Gang of Three”.

Posted by: Bob Graham Las Vegas | May 15, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

When did talking become a crime?
Growing up, we tell our kids to talk out their problems, not to fight and be kind to others.
Yet as we grow into adults, we can’t seem to follow those words. Instead it’s war war war.
If you want a FU((KEN war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself. Bring my Uncle home who is fighting to protect your big fat @sses.
if you support bush and want a war, go FU((KEN fight it yourself.
********************************
LMAO, you republicans scream WAR, and yet won’t stand up and fight for it……………. My uncle is FU((KEN fighting in your WAR and he’s doing it willingly because he supports this country, not this president.
lol and than you get mad when some asks for you to step up…..Oh, yeah, like BUSH you’re going to hide behind DADDY. I forgot that’s the REPUBLICAN way.

Posted by: amy | May 15, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Truth hurts, right?
The only good thing about Hussein Obama is terrorists may use a nuke against WDC and that will be that.
Most of America will not miss the beltway.

Posted by: leftisthater | May 15, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Ooooh… another conservative doesn’t like me.
Grief overwhelms me.
Hey guys, if Bush is doing so great in Iraq, then how come he had to have his generals pull a Josef Goebbels with the life and reputation of a guy like Pat Tillman?
You accuse Obama of playing fast and loose with the truth – would YOU like to go get shot 3 times in the head by your own comrades so Bush and the Pentagon could use YOU as a puff piece?

Posted by: charles sobieski | May 15, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

For once, I agree with Bush.

Posted by: Myshiba | May 15, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Why do George Bush and INSANE MCCAIN push policies that harm Israel? Aggression towards Iran will cause the region to erupt in so much violence that Israel would be lucky if they survived out the decade. Why do Bush and INSANE MCCAIN hate Israel so much that they would rather see the region, including Israel, in flames?

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Now California legalizes gay marriage. nothing like far left terrorist appeasers and married gay couples to mobilize the anti-Obama vote

Posted by: geevill | May 15, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Remember, Obama is the ONLY major political figure who says we should target Osama Bin Laden within Pakistan. He is the one who will take the war to the terrorists. We are not fighting terrorists in Iraq, we are NATION BUILDING and trying to keep Sunni and Shiite militias from killing each other. That is not fighting the jihadists at all.
When Obama talked about getting Bin Laden no matter where he is hiding, Bush and McCain both CRITICIZED him.
This notion that Obama will “appease terrorists” is not supported by any of the facts. This is more fear and smear politics that the country has come to expect from Republicans.

Posted by: The Phenom | May 15, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

If you people are so disgusted with Bush I want you to send you stimulus check back to help pay for the mortgage crisis…the gas crisis just to help the government a little!! Hamas says “DEATH TO ALL AMERICANS”

Posted by: pattydaggs | May 15, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Maybe Bush should have negotiated the same way Jimmy Carter did when he was in office. It worked so well back then. I wonder what Ronald Regan told the leadership in Iran for them to release the hostages on or about the time he took office?? Do you think it was the same thing that Obama would tell them or Biden would tell them or Pelosi would tell them or any one of those weak human beings. How about John Kerry, or John Edwards, which one has the words to settle this matter with known terrorists. Maybe Ted Kennedy, or John Murtha, or Harry Reed. Hey how about Kasinich, or maybe Chuck Schummer. Not one of those noble people can convince them to stop their hatred of us. Muslems have hated non muslems for many hundreds of years and the above mentioned people think that they can turn the tide with their remarkable words. How deluted their minds are. How political they make everything at the expense of the American people

Posted by: Trader | May 15, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

This is an example of our failing school system. For some people to buy into this bull crap from Bush.

Posted by: Jay | May 15, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Obama with foreign policy experience (now THAT’S a joke!)

Posted by: Myshiba | May 15, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Why do George Bush and INSANE MCCAIN push policies that harm Israel? Aggression towards Iran will cause the region to erupt in so much violence that Israel would be lucky if they survived out the decade. Why do Bush and INSANE MCCAIN hate Israel so much that they would rather see the region, including Israel, in flames?

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Obama with foreign policy experience (now THAT’S a joke!)

Posted by: Myshiba | May 15, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

The strongest argument against democracy is a five minute discussion with the average voter.
- Sir Winston Churchill
Many, many examples provided herein…

Posted by: smc | May 15, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

It’s starting.
On MSNBC, this morning, a black guest pundit said (To Obama), “Get ready
for the Big Leagues.” HA!!!!
This was in response to Bush’s admonition to anyone who thinks they can
“chat” with Hamas, etc. She said that Obama is going to have to get out there
and defend himself. Where is Mr. O anyway???
Yes, Mr. Obama. Get ready for the Viper Squad

Posted by: JulesTX | May 15, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Iran backs bin Laden.

Posted by: Angelo | May 15, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Myshiba said, “Obama with foreign policy experience (now THAT’S a joke!)” What was George Bush’s foreign policy experience before he became President? And no cheating. Snorting cocaine, and owning a failed baseball team do not count (even though the Rangers did play overseas once).

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

George Bush did not bankrupt this country… We the people did it, by
buying things you couldn’t afford, by borrowing money just because
someone said they would lend it to you. Racking up your credit
card knowing darn well the interest would eat you alive…
American’s need to take responsibily for their own foolish mistakes
and put the blame where it belongs and stop expecting everyone
else to bail you out……….. Obama is a fool to think he can negotiate
with our enemy. As they saying goes, keep your enemies close,
You don’t make friends with evil…! You just keep an eye on their
every move. They will be the first to call you an infidel because you
were stupid enough to shake their hand and make nice, “As though
they had changed their mind about killing you. They want Americans
dead, they want our land and riches. The religion tells them its okay
to lie to get what they want…

Posted by: sillyme | May 15, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

This is a moot point now. The California Supreme Court has just created a distraction at an opportune time to come to Obama’s defense. Gay “marriage” is now legal in California
Posted by: Carl Thomsen | May 15, 2008 1:36:50 PM
Don’t you people love it, when Judges overide the will of the people…
I thought Liberals believed that every vote counts. The people of California voted against Gay marriage, but Liberal judges over turn their vote. So much for every vote counts, right Liberals?

Posted by: CJ | May 15, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Before electing a DEMOCRAP congress:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.
After:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soared to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate
(stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
Remember it’s Congress that makes law not the President. He has to work with
what’s handed to him.

Posted by: RogerTheFishwife | May 15, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Obama doth protest too much.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

A FRIKIN’ AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!
It is abundantly obvious that MOST of the posters here have little or NO knowledge of American or World History. They delude themselves with ‘talking point’ political bias further demonstrating an inability to THINK for themselves!
Many actually believe Islam is a peaceful ‘religion’ when in actuality it is a system of government. And a brutal form of government at that. Would you want Pat Robertson or Rev. Wright in charge of America? Maybe the Jehovah Witnesses should cut off people’s heads right there on the front porch if folks don’t read The Watchtower and Awake? A little fear and force works.
And President Bush is blamed for EVERYTHING … $4 gas, a war about oil they say, bring the troops home(put that logic together – LOL).
The President and his oil cronies are also responsible for global warming(algore’s fantasy to get more govt. money?) … why those crazy Bush people even put SUV’s on Mars and the other planets (which are also warming up at the same rate as EARTH). Wonder if those crazy right-wingers also put some cows on Mars etc. … y’know, to lend a bit of farm odor from the bovine flatulence?
NAFTA is bad per Obama and Clinton, but so what, look for their supporters with bumper stickers on their Toyota, Nissan, Volvo cars. HYPOCRITES ALL!
And how about Hurricane Katrina? Pres. Bush got blamed for THAT! While the inept LA Gov. was wringing her hands, the goofball Mayor of New Orleans allowed 3000 school buses to go underwater because he had no drivers. HAH! I learned to drive a 40 foot bus in LESS THAN AN HOUR. All he had to do was point them north, load ‘em up and show the drivers where the brake pedal is located.
And the beat goes on … idiocy prevails!
The more I read some of the hate crap here, the more I see liberals as hypocrites, pessimists, losers and haters of America.
Still, I am proud to have served my country as a U.S. Marine. A lot of fine, patriotic young people have been killed and maimed over the years, just so some of the posters here can age their ignorance. THINK ABOUT THAT!

Posted by: Rod Miller | May 15, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

First of all, if you believe Bush smoked crack, what do you say about Obama with drugs in which he admitted in his book that he did drugs.
Even though I disagree with Bush, he is telling the truth of how some people have done and express how there is talks in meeting with terrorist without any preconditions (Carter & Obama). Obama clearly said that he would meet withought any preconditions in a CNN debate. Hillary said she would NOT meet with learders that wouldn’t meet the preconditions. There is a difference between terrorist and learders in this nation. So don’t come at Bush for something that Obama said in a CNN debate!

Posted by: Mary | May 15, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

This whole liberal & conservative mess drives me nuts. Anyone who subscribes fully to one philosphy without a willingness to listen to others is simply a sheep waiting for the slaughter.
Now on to the subject at hand. Both sides are wrong here; point one there is always room for diplomacy and the Bush administration in spite of their faults has done an outstanding job with North Korea an example of forceful diplomacy being successful. On the flipside the Obama’s of the world (as much as I hate the term “liberal” side) seems to believe negotiations are an infinte process and there is never a point where you acknowledge diplomacy has failed and military intervention is necessary. So we are left with two extremes incapable of moderation or negotiation; one aggressors who believe fighting is negotiation and the other utopiast who believe nothing is worth fighting for. Unless people begin unattaching from the teet of Republican and Democrat labels and try independent thought and voting for the best candidate rather than your favorite animal and the lesser of two evils this nation is doomed.
As for President Bush’s comment while I rarely if ever am in agreement with him, he is 100% correct on his statement. Jimmy Carter I imagine was the target of his commnet due to his recent meetings which only emboldened Hamas and triggered another of their attempts to overthrow Lebanon. Historically no one person has done more damage world wide than Jimmy Carter’s blind and idiotic diplomacy. It allowed the Ayatollah to overthrow the Shah of Iran (creating our current problems), allowed Americans in Beiruit to be slaughtered, Americans in Iran to be kidnapped and tortured, Russians to invade Afghanistan (our “covert” efforts trained and armed much of today’s terrorist). The list goes on and on with Carter who is a perfect example of a person who does not know that there is a time to fight and is so egotistical and stubborn in his pacifism that he refuses to acknowledge his negotiations have failed. Israel and “palestine” are in that position, negotiations have failed this is Islamic extremism based on racism and xenophobia no different than Hitler in their desire to terminate Jews. You cannot negotiate with madmen. The idea of a palestenian state is laughable seeing how as there is no such thing as a palestenian merely Egyptian migrants and migrants from other Middle Eastern countries. I do however think Israel must return the lands seized in previous wars, Golan Heights to Lebanon etc. As for the current areas occupied by these fictional “palestenians” they should be incorporated into the nation of Israel as was agreed at Israel’s inception. The fact that Islamofacist are so full of hatred that they are incapable of sharing land with people merely for being Jewish is irrelevant. What is next an Arayan city state in Germany? The best thing the US can do here is take the handcuffs off Israel and say do all that you must to preserve your nation and protect it’s people. Our role would simply be the bouncer to make sure no other nations jumped in the fight. That is the only way this will ever be resolved; attrition followed by rebuilding and eventual mending and assimilation. Anything else is a fool’s errand.

Posted by: JB | May 15, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Demorcats feeling guilty are they ?

Posted by: tankfixer | May 15, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

George (Hitler, Stalin) Bush speaks to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel’s statehood expressing his opinion and comparing the pursuit of dialogue with nations that he does not embrace as being reconciled to that of Nazi Germany and Hitler. George (Hitler, Stalin) Bush, you need to step back and look at your own track record of deception, subversion, invasion and lies over the past eight years. Appears that the “pot is calling the kettle black”, to me.

Posted by: OpusRooster | May 15, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

There are less than eight months until the election, an election that will decide the next President of the
United States.
The person elected will be the president of all Americans, not just the Democrats or the Republicans.
To show our solidarity as Americans, let’s all get together and show each other our support for the candidate of our choice. It’s time that we all came
together, Democrats and Republicans alike.
If you support the policies and character of John McCain, please drive with your headlights on during
the day.
If you support Obama or Hillary, please drive with your headlights off at night.

Posted by: Scott E | May 15, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

In Obama’s shiny new world, the arab nations will respect weakness and cowardice. 4 years of pleading and groveling should fix everything.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

The country will not let INSANE MCCAIN anywhere near the White House. He has flip flopped on Iraq ALREADY, five months before the election. First he wanted to stay there 100 years, now it’s out in 2013. INSANE MCCAIN has not only lost his marbles, he’s also not a very good liar.

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Posted earlier: “All who believe in 100% diplomacy are like Neville Chamberlain in 1938 who tried to appease Hitler.”
This misapplied comparison should have been put to bed years ago. First of all, nobody, including Obama, believes in 100% diplomacy. He’s said repeatedly that negotiations should be one PART of an armamentarium, and it’s the part that Bush and company have ignored. Bush has consistently set preconditions: You give up that which is to be negotiated, then we will negotiate. That isn’t diplomacy, that’s an ultimatum. Diplomacy is what JFK and Krushchev used to solve the Cuban missile crisis. Let’s see how you and I can settle this without further bloodshed. Second, does any sane person believe that if Chamberlain had not taken that last shot to avoid war, that World War II could have been avoided? The Munich accords were a risk worth taking, and when it failed, the inevitable war followed. Third, comparisons between Germany — a nationalistic, territorial state with a uniformed army and a united population behind it — and our current enemies — lacking overall organization, ridden with internal enmity, blended into the 90 percent who are innocent civilians, united only by their hatred of Western values and the religions of infidels — is more than misguided. It’s like comparing today’s highly paid athletic stars to Roman gladiators. Let’s drop the allusions to Munich because they don’t apply.

Posted by: Robert Maxwell | May 15, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

The Learjet Liberal Left are such cowards! There hasn’t been an attack on our soil since 9/11 thanks to Bush!Send “Barry” Obama back home to Mama where he can hang out with his long time spiritual advisor & his ole pal Bill Aires.

Posted by: BBH Florida | May 15, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Appeasers put your money where you mouth is and go to Iran and talk with the people, let them know you think guns are bad and you are unarmed and just want to talk.
Get that flight and go, no more talking about needing diplomacy and appeasement, just do it!

Posted by: Hojo | May 15, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Sillyme is not so silly.

Posted by: Angelo | May 15, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Of all the Gall! President Bush should be forced to clear all of his speeches with Senator Obama.

Posted by: robert trajan | May 15, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

9 out of 10 terrorists choose Obama over any other leading candidate!

Posted by: LL | May 15, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Obama: doth protest too much!

Posted by: Michael Anderson | May 15, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Bush is right, Obama is wrong! Obama and the New Liberal Democrats will be the end of us all! They will not turn the other cheek but, will turn their backs and run! And it will be me and my childern to fight. I for one am tired of defending “L” for loosers, I for one am tired of paying taxes to feed the unworthy, I for one say let the terrorist take their best shoot at the Liberal centers of waste and abuse. I for one, say terrorist take your best shoot at the Liberals. Now lets see if the Liberals will run!

Posted by: LRutherford | May 15, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Bush is an idiot and anyone who thnks diffrent is any idiot as well.

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Go GW!!! Some of you idiots never learn. Remember a date? 9/11 Yeah I can hear you now, oh that was so yesterday, we need to stop fighting and start helping these poor countrys.
My plan, stop forign aid and fix America, first thing is run off the liberal crazys back to Canada…YeeHaw!

Posted by: MrRight | May 15, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Honestly, liberals are the biggest crybabies on the face of the planet.
Bush is right – as he has always been.
Get over it losers!
The “change” politics of the radical left will only harm America – this was President Bush’s warning to all Americans that any retreat from fighting terrorism – including “negotiations” – will only serve to advance the cause of the terrorists, and many more innocent civilians will die as a direct result.

Posted by: One_American | May 15, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Rep. Rahm Emanuel: “The tradition has always been that when a US president is overseas, partisan politics stops at the water’s edge. President Bush has now taken that principle and turned it on its head”
All I’ve HEARD for the last 7 years is the Dems bashing Bush when overseas. What a bunch of HYPOCRITES!
Posted by: Ihateem | May 15, 2008 1:43:45 PM
EXACLTY!!!! in the past 7 Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton have all bash Bush and this great nation of ours while they are overseas….
The sad part is that the Obamabots and the rest of the Liberals will say…”yes, yes, you see…Bush is bad for bashing other politicians while overseas…” while they say nothign about their own politicians…
question to all the Liberals….Did President Bush name anyone by name? Why the outrage if Bush named no names? feeling guilty? know something we don’t? hahaha!!!
poor Liberals, they once again have been outsmarted by someone they believe is dumb.
I pity you Liberals…

Posted by: CJ | May 15, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Obama = Empty shirt

Posted by: Mojo | May 15, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Sometimes I wonder why God blessed the Middle-eastern lands with vast oil richness and left out his Jewish people of Israel. Could anyone explain?

Posted by: Deeply concern | May 15, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

How is this country going to survive with a leader who opposes God’s teachings but placates international thugs?

Posted by: Gregg | May 15, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Hey sweetie, we need change we can believe in and we need to believe we can find hope to change so we can believe…all across these 57 states. And I promise more Arabic speakers in Afganistan.

Posted by: Z Man | May 15, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Being somewhat a political junkie, and having spoken with friends at length, all are in agreement (even the die-hard)republicans. If Clinton wins the nomination she will win the election. If Obama wins the nomination, none of the people I have spoken with will vote for him.

Posted by: B. Fornaro | May 15, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

INSANE MCCAIN is senile. DO NOT ALLOW THIS UNSTABLE PERSON ANYWHERE NEAR THE WHITE HOUSE! He’s flip-flopped on Iraq ALREADY. First he wanted to stay there 100 years, and now it’s out in 2013. He can’t even remember what he said two weeks ago. DON’T LET INSANE MCCAIN INTO THE WHITE HOUSE!

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Hahahaha!! All of you are so freaking doomed! You are so weak! You whine and whine! Soon you will have something to really whine about! Then let us see how your Demon-crats grovel and cow-tow to the rulers of the Middle East all the while they tax and confiscate all your wealth and property!
Your dollar has already lost 93% of it’s original purchasing power since the Federal Reserve Corp. started making fiat paper money out of thin air. Soon it will loose all the rest and you will have hyper-inflation! Your time of feasting will soon be over!
You have done this to yourselves! What weak and gullible people you are!
Hahahaha!

Posted by: Sheikh Yeor Bu'Tay | May 15, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Wow!
This whole site is infested with delusional troglodites who cannot even see that the current administration IS THE ENEMY, IS THE TERRORISTS. Go watch “Washington You’re Fired” and get some smarts. This administration, and by extension John McINSANE McBush, have turned our once great nation into a jobless immoral evil nation that indiscriminately creates false-flag events in order to attack other sovereign nations. This government under the current administration abuses its own Constitution, Rule of Law and Justice Department, and is turning its growing police state against regular American citizens. Big Brother is also running rampant with its rapidly expanding illegal surveillance and constant monitoring and assault of normal law-abiding Americans. THIS is what America means to you? When was it ever referred to as “the Homeland’? This is a NAZI term, last used by Herr Hitler. Bush and his band of war criminals have subverted our legal system to allow Herr Bush all the powers of a dictator. THIS is what you want to defend? Go suck some more kool-aid. Traitors, enablers, to NAZIs are equally guilty. Real Americans need to oppose the neo-Nazi neo-cons in the Republican party and restore our nation to its original greatness based solidly on defense of our Constitution.

Posted by: Patricia | May 15, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

It’s both laughable and sad that American conservative whites need to be lied to everyday. Not just clever lies, but lies a 5 year would find hard to believe. And these narrow-minds repeat them, even when their leader has the worse approval rating for any modern US president in history.
Now I know why my grandfather’s generation called them devils.

Posted by: NatTurner | May 15, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Why do George Bush and INSANE MCCAIN push policies that harm Israel? Aggression towards Iran will cause the region to erupt in so much violence that Israel would be lucky if they survived out the decade. Why do Bush and INSANE MCCAIN hate Israel so much that they would rather see the region, including Israel, in flames?

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

As governor of texas, how much foreign policy experience did Bush have?

Posted by: Richard | May 15, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

I remember 9/11 and my memory says GWB was pres. Hmmmm.. why is he so good on security again?

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Eric…put the crack pipe down.

Posted by: Scott E | May 15, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

- Discuss with north Korea
- Discvuss with Gadafi who is the pioneer of terrorism before Bin Laden was even born.
but because Iran is somehow threatening israel, the shall be no talk!!!
By the way, why do i have the feeling that unlike Europeans, Americans dare say nothing againest Israel. Is the Knesset or the US Senate that has the power.Even your president or the candidates, weigh their words when it comes to Israel. It is a chronic infection to the US mindset. Help Israel defend itself but dont let US politics be only about Israel.

Posted by: Samy | May 15, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Obama said he would talk to them not that he would roll over and give them what they want. He also will talk to them strongly. People twist and turn words. this is why the usa is used by the politicians. lets get real. talking to Iran might help. nothing wrong with talking. You can stand firm when talking. Talking might lead to a resolution to the problem. Not talking only leads to more wars.

Posted by: DemocratForever | May 15, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Why do George Bush and INSANE MCCAIN push policies that harm Israel? Aggression towards Iran will cause the region to erupt in so much violence that Israel would be lucky if they survived out the decade. Why do Bush and INSANE MCCAIN hate Israel so much that they would rather see the region, including Israel, in flames?

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Once agian read the constitution! GOD HAS NOTHIG TO DO WITH OUR GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Once agian read the constitution! GOD HAS NOTHIG TO DO WITH OUR GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Though I’m no fan of bush, on this, bush is right on the money, and expose obama as being the empty suit that he is.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Though I’m no fan of bush, on this, bush is right on the money, and expose obama as being the empty suit that he is.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Why do George Bush and INSANE MCCAIN push policies that harm Israel? Aggression towards Iran will cause the region to erupt in so much violence that Israel would be lucky if they survived out the decade. Why do Bush and INSANE MCCAIN hate Israel so much that they would rather see the region, including Israel, in flames?

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

First, Obama is a christian. Second, how can Obama bankrupt the country when our current president already has, thanks to his brilliant war and third, if Bush wants to bring up history, why didn’t he look into the Vietnam war before bombing Iraq. What he joke. He’s the worst president ever.

Posted by: Tep | May 15, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Obama wants to be the President and yet he’s afraid of Fox News – what a pus*y.
Amy – can you actually do anything besides cut-n-paste? Perhaps color by the numbers? Or some other touchy feely crap -
All you liberal panty-waste MF’s need stand down and let the grownups fix things the you fu*king Democrats have undermined for the last few decades.
McCain may not be the perfect choice, but at least he won’t be humping the terroists legs hoping they’ll like us.
Go McCain!!!

Posted by: Bob New Bern, NC | May 15, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Excellent miles 1967,puts it in a nut shell

Posted by: Jim | May 15, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Congratulations to everybody who found
their new Messiah, senator Obama.
Obama is part of corrupted Illinois
political machine: one governor is sitting in jail while the sitting covernor is under investigation, and is
well on the way to jail.
Obama himself accepted real estate gift
of $300,000 from indited local lobbist.
Now, corrupted and not efficient senator
is going to change the Washington.
For starters, he is goign to kiss iranian mullah, he is going to sit and talk to all enemies and do Jimmy Carter redux. Want to see what happen next?
I do not.

Posted by: Alex | May 15, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

I remember 9/11 and my memory says Clinton was president when it was planned. Hmmmmmm…why is Hillary so good on security again?

Posted by: Scott E | May 15, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Wow, you can really tell that Drudge linked to this story. So many lemmings coming here to rant!
1) A delusional republican president in 2008 citing a delusional republican senator from 1939 is hardly something of which republicans should be proud.
2) Dialog and discussion is NOT the same thing as negotiation and appeasement. Obama says that you should be willing to talk about differences to see if there are peaceable ways to resolve conflicts. He does not say that he would do anything to the detrement of the US or Israel.
3) The lesson for today is to Stop, listen, think and then act, rather than only listen and act.

Posted by: TomInStL | May 15, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I would never believe it if someone told me the Democrats were going to nominate a candidate who makes both Hillary Clinton and GW Bush look good.

Posted by: geevill | May 15, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I would never believe it if someone told me the Democrats were going to nominate a candidate who makes both Hillary Clinton and GW Bush look good.

Posted by: geevill | May 15, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

How is this a “false charge.” The idiot clearly said he would sit down and talk to the likes of Iran, Cuba and others! History clearly shows that radicals like these are not persuaded by talk. Hey, B.O., you have the right to say whatever crap and non-sense you want, but you do not have the right to pick the consequences. You are an extremely dangerous man, and you will continue to be called on the extreme and radical stuff that comes out of your hole!

Posted by: Ed | May 15, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Bush is such a fool. He’s like an arsonist who is now trying to impede the fire trucks from getting to the fire that he started.

Posted by: Chris | May 15, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Has Bush caught Bin Laden yet?
It’s been almost 7 years…

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Eric…I’m serious…for the last time…put the crack pipe down.

Posted by: Scott E | May 15, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

If Americans think this is the bad times then they will soon learn what bad times really mean. These people have been killing people for thousands of years. You can not negotiate with someone who thinks human life means nothing. To them to die is better than living. Killing is what their GOD tells them to do. We can only hope that the fight stays overthere as long as possible.

Posted by: albert | May 15, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

A lot of u r stuck on this Islamic thing, I thought that whole thing wasnt even true and even if it is true who cares!? J because ur a muslim dsnt mean ur a terrorist at all actually thats like sayin all germans are nazis which isnt true either. guys stop being so narrowminded and focus on shi*t that actually matters.

Posted by: Hannah | May 15, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Barrack old buddy it wasn’t the last 8 years that strengthened Iran it was the jackass Carter who left our own people flapping in the wind when a bunch of animals took over our Embassy and we did NOTHING for 440 days

Posted by: Jim | May 15, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Yes America is an evil nation. Just ask Obama’s pals, Rev Wright and Professor Ayers. Where else but in America, can a confessed domestic terrorist become an “esteemed” professor. In Iran, he probably would have been rewarded with exocution.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Before the 2006 election:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.
Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate
(stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!
Remember it’s Congress that makes law not the President. He has to work with
what’s handed to him.

Posted by: RogerFishwife | May 15, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Does anyone else find it really funny that the democrats automatically think that President Bush is talking about them?

Posted by: Todd | May 15, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Maybe Bush should have negotiated the same way Jimmy Carter did when he was in office. It worked so well back then. I wonder what Ronald Regan told the leadership in Iran for them to release the hostages on or about the time he took office?? Do you think it was the same thing that Obama would tell them or Biden would tell them or Pelosi would tell them or any one of those weak human beings. How about John Kerry, or John Edwards, which one has the words to settle this matter with known terrorists. Maybe Ted Kennedy, or John Murtha, or Harry Reed. Hey how about Kasinich, or maybe Chuck Schummer. Not one of those noble people can convince them to stop their hatred of us. Muslems have hated non muslems for many hundreds of years and the above mentioned people think that they can turn the tide with their remarkable words. How deluted their minds are. How political they make everything at the expense of the American people

Posted by: Trader | May 15, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I am a democrat – but I agree with Bush (I never thought I would make that statement)on this one. Ombama does live in a fantasy world where he thinks he can give terrorists a big hug and everything will fine.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Obama better get used to it. He’s playing with the big boys now – Bush is major league and if he starts whining now -just wait till the real campaign gets started. Also, Bush is right, you can’t negotiate with terrorists.

Posted by: Kathy | May 15, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Obama better get used to it. He’s playing with the big boys now – Bush is major league and if he starts whining now -just wait till the real campaign gets started. Also, Bush is right, you can’t negotiate with terrorists.

Posted by: Kathy | May 15, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

McCain was diagnosed with stage 2A melanoma skin cancer in 2000. Voters should worry about the health of this candidate. Over 1/3 of people with 2A melanoma die within 10 years. We can’t allow a person with such a dire health problem to be President.

Posted by: Concerned | May 15, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

If the shoe fits. Dem appeasers appear uncomfortable. Their best response would be to stop talking with killers and simply agree with Bush. Even he can be right once or twice a day, and he is in this case. And Carter … for chrissakes.

Posted by: sido | May 15, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

“Diplomacy is the art of saying “Nice doggie” until you can find a rock.” – Will Rogers

Posted by: J | May 15, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

You cannot negotiate with tyrants!
When will the Democratics realize that simple fact? The only way to handle terrorists is to hunt them down and kill them.

Posted by: Crusader | May 15, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Tsk Tsk Obama, you lied to the American people openly today and no one is calling you on it.
If you all need a reminder, here it is. When Colombia went several miles into Bolivia to kill FARC rebels, they found a computer with a treasure trove of information. The information proved that Venezuela is helping finance the FARC with oil proceeds to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. What was also found were emails from Obama’s campaign manager discussing how America will work with Venezuela once Obama is elected. Obama sees no problems in being a communist dictator and believes our two countries should have closer ties. Hmmmm, does that sound like appeasment to you?

Posted by: Afkbrad | May 15, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Bush must not be able to read or he would have seen that Bill sent him a letter saying al quada is a huge threat and should be stopped.. Oh wait he was in texas burnig brush piles!
So why is BUsh good at security Oh!!! I Know!!! He takes away our freedoms! I know who the reak Hitler is and it’s Gorge Bush! Nothing more than a crusade to make all the right wing crazies happy! Shouldn’t you right wingers be in your jew hating churches?

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Since Bush never mentioned Obama by name, he must have recognized himself in Bush’s remarks. The man thus confesses.

Posted by: malarky1 | May 15, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Carter was waaayyyy worse than Bush! If you were alive then you’d understand that. The Dems wouldn’t even let him speak at their next convention as I remember. It’s been a while, but as I recall if he spoke, they either booed him or shunted off of prime-time or both. Hasn’t Hamas already endorsed Obama, hasn’t he said he’s ready to sit down with Achmadinij……whatever, just like Neville Chamberlain sat down with Hitler? It’s called appeasement folks, we’ll see a lot of it if BHO is elected.

Posted by: Todd | May 15, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

I’m not and here is why: Women have been messed over for many years by the Democrat Party and it appears that millions of “US” will be returning the favor, should this primary continue on its current path. Hillary Clinton is clearly the best choice to be our current parties’ choice as the nominee for President. As a life-long Democrat (55), I find it unacceptable to tolerate just how my party has hosed their most loyal and largest voting block; women. I am confident the Democrat Party will pay a severe price for this blatant assault on us women. Cry all you want about this being “sour grapes” but, little good will result in your on-going efforts to unite Hillary’s staunch supporters around “your chosen candidate” and not the peoples. All the Democrat Party wants us to do now is get their selected, from the start, elite, wimp Barack Obama elected in November. It will be a cold day in hell before I do that and I hope Hillary Clinton walks away from this Party, as well. As with most of the women I have contact, as well as many men, are finished with the Democrat Party now and forever. Many of “US are starting a grassroots movement to assure these kind of sorry tactics employed by my now soon to be former party, favoring a man who clearly has no shot without her support to win over the best women who can win this on her own, will never happen again. Until the final results are in Democrat Party leaders, we will just have to wait and see how things turn out once this primary season comes to a close. I for one am changing my registration to Independent, if not Republican, on the same day that I vote for Hillary in Kentucky. Once all our votes are counted, if you the party leaders allow that to happen, you’ll just have to wait and see how deep this “bitterly disappointed” and highly ashamed of this blatant insult to women is across America. To do this to the largest voting block in America is truly, for my soon to be former Democratic Party, a travesty. Bye, bye now and good riddance from Mary L. O’Bryan, Louisville, KY, soon to be former Democrat, no matter what happens in the primaries left to come.

Posted by: Mary O'Bryan | May 15, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

McCain was diagnosed with stage 2A melanoma skin cancer in 2000. Voters should worry about the health of this candidate. Over 1/3 of people with 2A melanoma die within 10 years. We can’t allow a person with such a dire health problem to be President.

Posted by: Concerned | May 15, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

To my surprise in this election, I’m finding more and more Jews as Racists!Logically you’d think Jews would be the least racist because what happened in Nazi Germany. They saw the ugly face of Racism and Fascism. The Jewish community should be careful and not alienate Americans. Americans will start saying why should we risk our lives and fight for Israel in the next war. Why should a Hispanic,African American or a Christian Infidal fight for a People that look down on us as second class citizens. I think Isreal has a PR problem here in the U.S.A. Israel already has a bad reputation around the world espeacially with the U.N. I met alot Jews that would take their shirt off their back to help someone and are not Racists before the election. But maybe this election is bringing the worst out of people especially the Racists.

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

I think the current crop of Democrats are overly sensitized to criticism. Bush could have just as easily have been talking about Carter’s recent trip to talk to Hamas. After all, he was just there and Bush’s audience was Isreal, not Iran. Lighten up Obama.

Posted by: LongT | May 15, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Bush’s comment, “Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals…” would seem to refer more to Carter’s recent talks with Hamas. Especially as Obama has been extremely clear that he would negotiate only with actual governments, not terrorists.

Posted by: Judith | May 15, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

What exactly has Bush’s diplomacy given us? Hamas is more powerful than ever, and is the elected government for the Palestinians. Iran is more powerful than ever, is gaining more and more influence in Iraq amongst Shiite radicals, and is more powerful than before Bush. Iraq is a complete mess, costing thousands and thousands of Americans and costing hundreds of billions we could be using to improve our own economy. The US economy is tanking. Oil is hitting record prices everyday, while Bush does nothing about the problem. Terror attacks worldwide are increasing every year under Bush while we are bogged down in Iraq. Osama Bin Laden is still making tapes mocking America and calling for attacks on America, but Bush won’t go into Pakistan to get him.
How has Bush’s method of running things helped at any level? Why would people still think Bush’s methods were the way to go? You’d have to be a brainwashed zombie to think Bush has the answer to anything.

Posted by: The Phenom | May 15, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

George Bush is so dumb I’m suprised he even knows were he is… Also isn’t he the one that flew Bin Ladens family out of your country without even asking them where he is.. I know if I murdered a bunch of people the cops wouldn’t fly my family out of the country. The way things are now they would have been torturing the hell out of them!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Rod Miller….perfectly said!! Thank you for serving our country. And thank you for being proud to serve our country! BTW, I drive a Buick!!

Posted by: pattydaggs | May 15, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Hmmmmmm, I just didn’t hear a name provided as to the Bush accusation, BUT whammmmmm, the Obama brood slammed back V-E-R-Y expeditiously with a callow (juvenile) retort. Could it be that THEY DID EXPRESS this inexperienced, idiotic, imbecilic, foolhardy, reckless solution!
YES THEY DID (say it)………YES THEY CAN…..schmoooooze Ahmadinijad!!!!
I am sure that one of the ethical journalists will provide the childish quote……! Our family combines Judaism and Catholicism, thus, trust me……….we bank in absolutely everything that would be detrimental or desparaging to either. Sooooooooo please stop the incessant LYING!!!!!!
Every fox smells it’s own hole: why get offended if the utterence is not applicable to your naive, immature, stump ramblings??????!!!!!

Posted by: Morgan | May 15, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

A lot of u r stuck on this Islamic thing, I thought that whole thing wasnt even true and even if it is true who cares!?
Posted by: Hannah | May 15, 2008 1:59:54 PM
———————————-
Hannah, you are stunningly ignorant. First, learn to spell and write properly in what I assume is your native tongue. Second, I strongly suggest you learn a little something about Islam.
Muslims consider all non-muslims to be lesser, to be beneath them. They are not required to be honst with them, to deal fairly, or treat them as human.
I know the press has tried to make it look as though Islam vs Christian is a lot like Lutheran vs Catholic, but it’s not.
Educate yourself before you hand over the country to someone who will kill you and your family with no remorse and without a second thought if you fail to convert to their religion.

Posted by: RogerFishwife | May 15, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Concerned — I did not know that McCain had skin cancer. I just looked it up, and you’re right he does have a serious form of skin cancer. I agree this needs to come into consideration when choosing my vote.

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Concerned: Right now I’m a little more concerned with Obama’s bigotry than I am about McCain’s melanoma from 8 years ago.

Posted by: ddl | May 15, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Senator Obama’s election as President would assure a second major victory in the Islamic war (Jihad) against Western culture or in other words, our way of life.
When the Soviets left Afghanistan the Taliban filled a vacuum and established a government of Islamic fundamentalist laws, which protected enemies of the West.
With a second major victory under their belt, Islamic fundamentalists will be encouraged and emboldened to make further attacks against the West, in their primary effort to convert the entire World to Islam.

Posted by: Guam Rob | May 15, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

That’s why I, and now Repubs too probably, think that this little fella should have been impeached long time ago. He’s liable to do alot of damage in his remaining time.

Posted by: Mike McDermott | May 15, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

We talk very smart, paying and grumble at the oil prices and at the pumping station and still depends upon the Middle Eastern oil countries for oil. Nobody foresaw we may someday depend heavily upon them to have an alternative. Our priorities have gotten mixed up and now “protecting our interest in Iraq” what interest do we have in Iraq to protect instead of our own?

Posted by: Deeply concern | May 15, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Afkbrad – You seem to be confusing Bush with Obama; Jew hating churches. But then, you seem to forget that Clinton was offered bin Laden but found him too much bother.

Posted by: malarky1 | May 15, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Which one of the “57″ State is Obama in today?

Posted by: Todd | May 15, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Which one of the “57″ States is Obama in today?

Posted by: Todd | May 15, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Get smart, you fuzzy thinkers! Without a properly defended and properly educated country, a recipe for disaster is put into play. After the founding of our country and the Civil War, we’re now at the third most important time in the history of our 232 short years of existence. Since politics and economics are inextricably intertwined, how we deal with the terrorist problem threatening to destabilize parts of the world will directly affect not only our lives here, but the quality of life in other parts of the world. To paraphrase the greatest man of the 20th century, Winston Churchill, “we must fight them everywhere and we must never give up”. Having said that, it is obvious that McCain is the ONLY logical and reasonable choice to guide us through increasingly tough times. Without a tough leader, our country is in major trouble.

Posted by: Hal | May 15, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Since Bush figures his big contribution to the troops fighting in the Middle East was to give up golf anything he says should go in one ear and out the other – much like his thinking does.
10 more months – 10 more months and hopefully THIS country will get back on track.

Posted by: Mary | May 15, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Baloney. McCain didn’t have skin cancer. You’re a lying lib, Concerned!

Posted by: Frank | May 15, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

I am so very glad that many that post here are not the President. It is easy to criticize and complain that we have not captured Osama. How about the hero of you Liberals, Bill Clinton? He would not take Bin Laden when he was offered. The Carter and Clinton administrations tried to negotiate with the terrorists, and we all know how effective they were.
Say what you want about President Bush… He and the US Military have kept
us from being attacked since 9/11. I trust that you really would not prefer to fight the war on terror here. For those continue to believe that the terrorists do not want us dead… WAKE UP!

Posted by: rck | May 15, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Get smart, you fuzzy thinkers! Without a properly defended and properly educated country, a recipe for disaster is put into play. After the founding of our country and the Civil War, we’re now at the third most important time in the history of our 232 short years of existence. Since politics and economics are inextricably intertwined, how we deal with the terrorist problem threatening to destabilize parts of the world will directly affect not only our lives here, but the quality of life in other parts of the world. To paraphrase the greatest man of the 20th century, Winston Churchill, “we must fight them everywhere and we must never give up”. Having said that, it is obvious that McCain is the ONLY logical and reasonable choice to guide us through increasingly tough times. Without a tough leader, our country is in major trouble.

Posted by: Hal | May 15, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

The truth hurts, doesn’t it BHO.

Posted by: Word Up | May 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

God has everything to do with our Government and I PROMISE that if our government does not follow his commends, we will all pay for it!

Posted by: Gregg | May 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

I don’t think McBush will last thru the election probably think he’s in vetnam still and run from charlie right off a roof!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

I don’t think McBush will last thru the election probably think he’s in vetnam still and run from charlie right off a roof!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

He’s so vain he probably thinks bush’s speech is about him.

Posted by: ra | May 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Time for a speech about understanding and respecting terrorists and all that they stand for. After all, it is all our fault.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

RogerFishwife criticized Hannah for her spelling and yet doesn’t seem to know how to spell HONEST. That’s because RogerFishwife is an idiot.

Posted by: Poobah | May 15, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

He’s so vain he probably thinks bush’s speech is about him.

Posted by: ra | May 15, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

right on Bush. Tell the Dem girly-men the way it is…

Posted by: ryte | May 15, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

GOD IS A MYTH! and IF HE IS REAL IT’S PAINFULY OBVIOUS THAT HE HATE USA

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Frank — Concerned may be a lying lib, but he’s right about McCain having a serious form of skin cancer. I looked it up. I think that is definitely something to consider. It may not be safe to have a President in office that’s in dire health.

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

“Obama has shown the judgement needed to run this country. Gates agree. “We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage . . . and then sit down and talk with them,” Gates said. “If there is going to be a discussion, then they need something, too. We can’t go to a discussion and be completely the demander, with them not feeling that they need anything from us.” That reasoning may work with countries founded upon and operating under principles other than absolutism. But what leverage can you find or what inducements can you offer to a regime (such as Nazi Germany and militant religious extremists) when their only acceptable policy is the elimination of all viewpoints that do not completely align with theirs? Once again the there is an alarming trend in this country and world towards “peace for our time”.

Posted by: Publius | May 15, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Bush proves once again he’s an idiot. His analogy to 1938 and Nazis shows he’s out of touch. Talking with your enemies is not appeasement. Refusing to talk with them is stupidity. We spent years talking with our enemies (USSR, China, etc..). How many wars were prevented by doing so? No one has ever suggested talking with terrorists but talking to (not giving into) countries deemend to be our enemies is not a weakness.

Posted by: indy_voter | May 15, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Sisto Maxima:Maybe you should read up on a little history before you call Jews racist. There are many Jews who were killed and are now buried in the South. They were killed while fighting for black civil rights.You know how blacks thanked them? Jessie Jackson called New York hymietown. Farrakhan called it a gutter religion. The Clintons’ could have learned a lesson from the experience of the Jews. Oh, and yes the manager of the Obama campaign is David Axelrod, a Jew.

Posted by: beo | May 15, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

OK I’m spelling my words. Your comment really changed my way of thinking,You’re right I am very ignorant. I could care less that you think I’m ignorant especially since you clearly are, also that was only part of my comment. I suppose you wouldn’t like me anyways even if I agreed with you because I’m Jewish and you probably think we killed Jesus.

Posted by: Hannah | May 15, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Gregg, I truthfully agree with you. We profess in God we trust, we also pledge not to be indivisible. Thank you God is watching us.

Posted by: Deeply concern | May 15, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

DEE DEE DEE DEE! I LIKE GORGE BUSH!!!!
Don’t hate me cause you worshiop lies and liers!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

What does it matter if McCain had cancer. If it should return the VP takes over – that is why it is important to have a good VP.

Posted by: Brian | May 15, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

I like the example of Marcus Licenius Crassus during the war with Parthia (present day Iran). He and his delegation went to negotiate under a flag of truce and were captured and executed. Crassus’ head was sent back to Rome pickeled in a barrel. Strength and power is the only thing radical islamists and terrorists understand, not negotiations.

Posted by: Carlos | May 15, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Barack then went on to whine, “You can’t use my own words and policy statements against me! That’s bigotted!”
Then he looked to his teleprompter for more words to say.

Posted by: ynot4tony2 | May 15, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Barack then went on to whine, “You can’t use my own words and policy statements against me! That’s bigotted!”
Then he looked to his teleprompter for more words to say.

Posted by: ynot4tony2 | May 15, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

It’s too bad that a C student can be so correct while all those who claim to be brighter and have a better mind just don’t get it.
Let me ask, what far, far, far, far right person, especially one in control of so much oil and money and with immense power over others, have you know it alls ever trusted to tell you the truth ?

Posted by: Slick | May 15, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

The Lord is dissapointed in the USA because we have turned our back on him and rejected so many of his commands. Now we are entertaining a potential leader who will lead us further away (not that the existing leader is perfect at all) from him. God is not mocked. If we don’t repent we will pay for it…

Posted by: Gregg | May 15, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Prescott Bush. Now tell me who support a national socialist?
Independent research is amazing!

Posted by: hoogouer | May 15, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Brian — I think the health of the President matters a great deal. Voters are electing McCain so that his VP can take over if his cancer returns. Do we want a President in office that’s in dire health? I think the answer for most people is no.

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Sounds like Bush struck a chord with the niave liberal Dems. The truth hurts, what else needs to be said.

Posted by: billy bob | May 15, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Sounds like Bush hit a nerve with Obamites. Hmmmmmmm.

Posted by: AndyMon | May 15, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

I think Bush was your anti christ. It fits into place. Man when did Pat Robinson figure out how to use a computer. Go pray or something…Boy!

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Do we really want Obama as president of the 50 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or president of the 57 or 58 that he’s visited. What a great reflection on a potential president and our wonderful democratic-ran educational system

Posted by: Bink | May 15, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Lord God, please help this country return to you with all our hearts. We have sinned against you and ask for your forgiveness. Please turn and heal our country and help us unify under your mighty hand giving us the wisdom to lead as you would have us lead.
in Christ,
Amen

Posted by: Gregg | May 15, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

hoogouer…nobody gives a damn about Prescott Bush. Shut the hell up and go sit back down on the retard bench and wait for your name to be called.

Posted by: hoogouer is stupid | May 15, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

It really scares me now that someone like Pelosi is 3rd in line for the presidency. That woman is crazy.

Posted by: Robert B | May 15, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

You Liberal Democrats “Left Wingers”. It’s OK with you when all of you go out of the USA and BASH Bush and use his name but when a random statement is made that could be any one of you making the statement to talk to IRAN it’s unconceivable that President Bush could utter such words. Most of you shouldn’t have been allowed back in the USA. Like J. Carter a traitor to the USA. If you Liberals can’t handle it get out of the “Kitchen”. President Bush should have said more…
Look UP that’s where all of our answers will come from.

Posted by: Shirley | May 15, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

You Liberal Democrats “Left Wingers”. It’s OK with you when all of you go out of the USA and BASH Bush and use his name but when a random statement is made that could be any one of you making the statement to talk to IRAN it’s unconceivable that President Bush could utter such words. Most of you shouldn’t have been allowed back in the USA. Like J. Carter a traitor to the USA. If you Liberals can’t handle it get out of the “Kitchen”. President Bush should have said more…
Look UP that’s where all of our answers will come from.

Posted by: Shirley | May 15, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Funny how the left can spew all the bile and venom they want particularly at Bush, but God forbid anyone dare challenge them on their willingness to talk to rogue and radical nations. B.O. said what he said, and America deserves to know what others think of this foolish course of action. Dems are terrified of losing yet again in November, and their rabid and hysterical response to Bush’s comments is proof-postive.

Posted by: Ed | May 15, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

FOOD FOR THOUGHT ===============
Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?
Is North Korea not supposed to be part of the axis of evil along with Iran & Syria?
Why is Bush negotiating with the Iraqi insurgents? Have they ceased to be terrorists?
Hypocrisy!!!

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Wow, Bush calls it out for once.
And Barack Obama’s response did nothing but show his own inexperience. I like how he did not refute Bush’s comparison, but just said it was uncalled for/politicking/etc. That’s what most politicians do when they have nothing to say. I’m surprised he didn’t call Bush a bigoted xenophobe.
He can talk about Bush making Iran stronger all he wants, but in reality, he’s the one who wants to sit down and convince them to end their nuclear program. Hmm, sounds a lot like ’39, doesn’t it?

Posted by: Sir Andrew | May 15, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Joe, it is apparent that you are seriously biggoted! Go take an enema!

Posted by: Morgan | May 15, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

As “W” does his farewell tour, (which by the way, is costing taxpayer dollars.), he is running around making baseless speeches which contribute to the divisivness of this country. Hasn’t he done enough damage to this country. Quite frankly, Bush oes not have the capacity to even write a speech with such great detail. He is only as good as his writers allow him to be.

Posted by: Ray Acevedo-Flores | May 15, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Jesus didn’t die on the cross anyway. How the heck.. why are we talking about this? sorry I apologize.

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

I think the fact that McCain has a serious form of skin cancer is a game changer. Do we want a President in the White House who’s in dire health? I don’t think most people do.

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Democrats are stupid people.

Posted by: Ron | May 15, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Who is Bush Jr. to talk? Wasn’t it grandpa Prescot Bush who was Hitler’s top financier operating from a bank in New York, overseeing Hitler’s assets? I think I once read somewhere.

Posted by: look_who's_talkin | May 15, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

I’d rather vote for someone fighting cancer than a coward with a yellow streak a mile wide.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Bill hates McCain because he had skin cancer. Bill is stupid.

Posted by: Bill is stupid | May 15, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

No were not repubs. are dumb! What are you in third grade?

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

McCain DID have cancer — melanoma — the most lethal type of skin cancer you can get. It can metastasize (spread) throughout the body and into organs such as the lung, liver, brain, etc. His lesion was on the side of his face. And as for the crack about Obama being afraid to appear on FOX NOISE, well you must not watch it every Sunday, because indeed Obama was interviewed by Chris Wallace just a couple of weeks ago.

Posted by: rh | May 15, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Mack said, “I’d rather vote for someone fighting cancer than a coward with a yellow streak a mile wide.” Mack — that may be your inclication, but I think most people will vote for the candidate who they think is best physically able to do the job. Can the country afford to have a President who is in dire health? I think the answer is no. I think McCain’s skin cancer is going to be a game changer, unfortunately.

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Obama’s job as president will be to protect this country from all enemies–foreign and domestic. And in this response, he’s proved that he can do both at the same time.
Posted by: slag | May 15, 2008 12:37:55 PM
To Slag: Name one ONE, ONE, ONE foreign accomplishment of obama’s. ONE.

Posted by: CalifLady36 | May 15, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Well this blog is a scary place – the blind rage felt on the right seems more than a little misplaced.
George Bush has done nothing to make this country safer or more respected in the world. By all accounts, he has managed to be the most fiscally irresponsible president we may have ever had.
He has however been very good to his and Cheney’s friends at Halliburton, Blackwater, and Carlisle Group – talk about war profiteering!! It was good to hear he has given up golf in support of our troops – he is obviously a true leader.
The world is changing – the increasingly educated members of the American electorate have begun to show their own leadership and the result is not looking good for those interested in continuing Bush’s regime of fear.
The incompetence that Bush and his cronies have foisted upon the American people will – without question – be viewed as one of the worst presidencies in our history.
They ignored intelligence pre-9/11.
They squandered global support after 9/11 by attacking a country that had nothing to do with it.
They made the Hurricane Katrina disaster even worse by ignoring the people of the Gulf Coast and then sending in their utterly unprepared FEMA director.
They have lied constantly about their intentions.
Boy is it time for a change – sorry more of you can’t see that.

Posted by: Concerned for the Future | May 15, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

The Phenom – No, I think more accurately, Obama is a half-af. But in all seriousness, his race shouldn’t matter. It is his lack of judgment and his far left politics that are important.

Posted by: malarky1 | May 15, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

WHAT WOULD BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA DO IF
WHITES VOTED 90% AGAINST HIM ?????????
WOULD THIS BE ADDED TO HIS CRITISIMS ?
STALIN AND MARX HAD A WORD FOR WHITES WHO WILL VOTE FOR HIM. “USEFULL IDIOTS”

Posted by: Warren | May 15, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

FOOD FOR THOUGHT ===============
Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?
Is North Korea not supposed to be part of the axis of evil along with Iran & Syria?
Why is Bush negotiating with the Iraqi insurgents? Have they ceased to be terrorists?
Hypocrisy!!!

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

The executive director of an Illinois ethics watchdog group calls it politics as usual. “Did he get contributions from those companies down the line? Yeah. That story’s been told a million times in American politics, and it will be told a million times more,” said Jay Stewart of the Illinois-based Better Government Association. “I don’t think Obama’s any different.”……
Go bush!!!!……Even bush knows Obama is out of his mind…God i hope something really good comes out on Obama that will show people what he really is all about…..But you will still have those ones with no brains….

Posted by: PC | May 15, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

This reminds me of Margaret Thatcher saying over and over “we will not negotiate with terrorists” and the bombs coming closer and more frequently into London, buses, pizza parlors. Those terrorist irish! kill them all! there will never be peace with them! they are crazy! they are only interested in killing people!!! right??? Then comes along John Major, a young guy like obama, who had other ideas, he sends someone over to talk to the IRA, with…GASP!!! The terrorist Gerry Adams!!! dear God! WE can’t talk to him! He’s an IRA terrorist….fast forward a decade and instead of a decade of war, you had a decade or progression toward peace with two waring sides who have been at war with one another for over 600 years!! if not actually, over a 1000! Sorry right-wingers you and Bush and Thatcher are DEAD WRONG. So funny Bush says that we should turn to history. When you do, you see that dialogue brings peace. Hitler had no reasonable gripes with his neighbors. The middle east has a millions reasonable gripes with us. it’s not mental illness with them, it’s anger and resentment over very real policies. Obama is right. He would make a much better president when it comes to foreign policy and diffusing the anger that turns into terrorism, absolutely. he is our version of John Major and Dear Lord, we could use a John Major right now!

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

How well do we really know Obama? Obama, whose father was a practicing Muslim and whose mother was a radical Marxist, has stated that his mother: “Was the dominant figure in my formative years; and, the values she taught me continue to be my touchstone in the world of politics”. Common sense deductive reasoning suggests that Obama’s rearing as a child, and his extended 20yr relationships with anti-American fanatics such as Rev. Wright and William Ayers are in fact reflective of Obama’s true psychological makeup. This man’s refusal to wear an American flag lapel pin and to place his hand over his heart on the singing of our National Anthem are conditioned reflexes from his protracted association with disaffected elements in our society; visual images that Obama is certain to attempt to obfuscate in future campaign appearances. Further, Michelle Obama’s angry commentary directed at our country is telling. Obama’s statements that he would use Tactical Nuclear Weapons against Pakistan, while in other commentary stating that he would halt the U.S. military’s development of advanced weapons systems demonstrates a profound ignorance of the geopolitical threat environment confronting America. Obama is indeed the real-life Manchurian Candidate. Greg Neubeck

Posted by: Greg Neubeck | May 15, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

It might be time for a change, but a change away from God’s values will just doom this country more quickly. The only thing we should judge a candidate on is their values….

Posted by: Gregg | May 15, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Pre Bush years:
Years of negotiation with Saddam. (Yeah, that worked out well.)
Bush years:
Saddam captured, tried and hanged for crimes against humanity by a free Iraq. (Negotiate that you all!)
P.S. Remember that negotiated “food for oil” deal the UN worked out with Saddam? Corruption city. (Yeah, “appeaser” message delivered and received loud and clear!)

Posted by: Bomb Bomb Iran! | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

also, i did have ot chuckle at bush’s refence to Hilter. His family has ties with the Nazi for..what else, money making. So far be it for him to say that the Nazi’s were the bad guys. His family was Nazi sympathizers! hello, pot???? you’re calling the kettle black!

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

OK I’m spelling my words. Your comment really changed my way of thinking,You’re right I am very ignorant. I could care less that you think I’m ignorant especially since you clearly are, also that was only part of my comment. I suppose you wouldn’t like me anyways even if I agreed with you because I’m Jewish and you probably think we killed Jesus.
Posted by: Hannah | May 15, 2008 2:17:12 PM
Well, Hannah, that’s a good start. Proper spelling and grammar allow people to see you’re not entirely the ignorant twit your comments might lead them to believe you are.
I never said anything about the Jews. I’ve known a lot of Jews in my life, and most of them were lovely people. A few were jerks, but that is to be expected in any large group of people.
Again, I strongly suggest you educate yourself on Islam. Are you aware that Mohammed, their prophet, would be called a pedophile by today’s standards? That he married a 7 year old girl? That the Koran tells them that they should go out and spread their religion by the sword, and kill all who refuse to convert?
As a Jew, a group that prizes knowledge and education, you should be horrified by Islam’s repression of education.
“O ye who believe! Ask not questions about things which if made plain to you, may cause you trouble. Some people before you did ask such questions, and on that account lost their faith.” (Surah 5:101-102).
“The Holy Prophet himself forbade people to ask questions …so do not try to probe into such things.” (The Meaning of the Qur’an, Maududi, vol. III, pgs. 76-77)
“The prophet was asked about things which he did not like, and when the questioner insisted, the Prophet got angry. (vol. 1, no. 92) The Prophet got angry and his cheeks or his face became red. (vol. 1, no. 91) “Allah has hated you…[for] asking too many questions.” (vol. 2, no. 555; and vol. 3, no. 591, Bukhari’s Hadith commenting on Muhammad’s reaction to hostile questioners.)

Posted by: RogerFishwife | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

As the great philosopher Han Solo said (to Luke Skywalker referring to Princess Leia in Episode 5):
“Must have hit pretty close to the mark to get her all riled up.”
Har Har!

Posted by: Lord Har Har | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it’s mistakes. Barack is a risk to this nation’s security. Appeasement or living together never worked in the past: NEVER! and will not work in the future. When dealing with leaders of rogue nations such as Iran, Syria who share the same sympathies as Al Quaeda and Taliban and militant Islam, Hamas, and exists for the sole purpose of murder and terrorism, you must KILL them, not appease them.
I would love to see Carter and Barack speaking with Hamas. Who do you think gets stripped, tortured and drug around naked in the streets behind a camel’s a-s-s first? Barack is a threat to our national security.

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Who shares my ideals?
Obama? Heck no.
Clinton? Not a chance.
McCain? No different than the other two.
Bob Barr hopefully gets the Libertarian nod because McCain is Hillary or Obama with 4 more years in Iraq. He won’t cut spending and will only increase government’s responsibilities in our lives. I’m voting for my principles. I won’t be a part of this nation’s destruction by falling for ignorance in a horse race.
Do you all not understand that you are fighting over which socialist is better than the next? They are all three one in the same and will bring this country to its knees. Think about who funds government, who draws from it, and how much of it is necessary!

Posted by: Live Free or Die | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it’s mistakes. Barack is a risk to this nation’s security. Appeasement or living together never worked in the past: NEVER! and will not work in the future. When dealing with leaders of rogue nations such as Iran, Syria who share the same sympathies as Al Quaeda and Taliban and militant Islam, Hamas, and exists for the sole purpose of murder and terrorism, you must KILL them, not appease them.
I would love to see Carter and Barack speaking with Hamas. Who do you think gets stripped, tortured and drug around naked in the streets behind a camel’s a-s-s first? Barack is a threat to our national security.

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

If Obama is elected prez, I believe he will surpass Jimmy Carter as W.P.E. (Worst. President. Ever.) Good Luck, America, you’re gonna need it!!!

Posted by: JT | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Publius- Gate said “US to develope leverage and then talk with”! Obama said he would talk to them with no restriction!!! When you read a statement make sure you know what you are reading!! Obama will not win the GE even if he selects Hillary (she should not go near him under any circumstances) because white america does not need this piece of dog $%^$
in the white House!! He is a no-nothing idiot with baggage that includes anti-americans and hate mongering pastors! Hillary or McCain
that is the choice

Posted by: pattydaggs | May 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Publius- Gate said “US to develope leverage and then talk with”! Obama said he would talk to them with no restriction!!! When you read a statement make sure you know what you are reading!! Obama will not win the GE even if he selects Hillary (she should not go near him under any circumstances) because white america does not need this piece of dog $%^$
in the white House!! He is a no-nothing idiot with baggage that includes anti-americans and hate mongering pastors! Hillary or McCain
that is the choice

Posted by: pattydaggs | May 15, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

FYI FOR THOSE VOTING DEMOCRAT:
The gas prices, taxes and unemployment didn’t rise until after 2006 when America voted in Democrats into Congress. Before that gas was under $3. You need to wake up and smell the coffee.
ALSO: If you really listen to what Clinton and Obama’s plan for this nation is, you will vote Republican without a question. WHat they ultimately want is for the U.N. laws to supercede our Constitution. If you want the U.N. running your life, vote Democrat and telling you what you canand can’t do, vote Democrat. There is a reason why the terrorists want Obama to win.
I totally agree with the person who said that Liberalism is a mental disease.

Posted by: Brunette | May 15, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

FOOD FOR THOUGHT ===============
Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?
Is North Korea not supposed to be part of the axis of evil along with Iran & Syria?
Why is Bush negotiating with the Iraqi insurgents? Have they ceased to be terrorists?
Hypocrisy!!!

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Everyone say it out loud right now:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!!!!
Sounds good!
later I’m leaveing have fun with this hope you guys have a good day. Vote with you mind.

Posted by: Joe | May 15, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

President Bush was right in what he said. Diplomacy only works when both sides want diplomacy. China wanted diplomacy with Nixon and they gave signs of diplomacy. The USSR under Gorbachev wanted diplomacy. Before they showed signs of diplomacy we were ready to destroy them. Hitler never wanted diplomacy and it was completely transparent what his plans were. The same is true about Iran. THey have their plans and going to carryt them out unless stopped. Talk will not stop them, but rather give them more time.
As for blaming President Bush for the high gas prices etc, that’s rubbish through and through. It has been and will remain a failed environmental policy of the liberals to keep us from drilling our own oil. They have thier heads in the clouds and think that just trying is good enough. It’s not. We will have food shortage now becuase of the ethenol production. This is the liberal baby. It’s not the thought that counts it’s results and blaming President Bush for Democrat failures is absurd at best. Wake up liberal and get your heads out of the clouds. President Bush has let the Democrats in Congress have their way for eight long years and spending is out of control, gas prices are out of control and the Dem congress has done nothing to end the war in Iraq except hog tie the commanders in Iraq and treat them like idiots.
Iran needs to know that we will back up Israel no matter what Iran threatens. President Bush, wether you’ll admit it or not, is a strong leader and knows what he’s talking about. Liberal hatred and passion about him is blinding and misguided. President Bush is winning the war on terror and anyone versed in tactic knows you want to fight in other countries, not yours. He may not be a well spoken person but he speaks the truth about Iran.
How is the Vice President a Nazi by the way? All this name calling…. I think that before we throw insults we should think about what it says about ourselves. Is it true or are we just at a loss of good argument and have result in name calling. Name calling is easy but rarely backed up and usually comes from the left. Just read all of the blogs on this page and you’ll see most of the name calling comes from the very anti President Bush folks. Very interesting.

Posted by: petz | May 15, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

“‘Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.”
Bush quoted Sen. William Borah (R)
BTW, ole GW pulled a Dixie Chick.

Posted by: ProudIndie | May 15, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

He never mentioned Obamas name. Why would he take offense to it if he never saod it?! Makes you wonder. Jan 7, 2007. His interview with FOX.

Posted by: skip | May 15, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

I am not thrilled with everything President Bush has done during his time in office — there are plenty of issues on which I disagree with his policy — however, nobody can dispute that both the United State and the U.N. have invested a load of time and effort already in “diplomacy” in dealing with Iran, which has clearly not phased them and has not changed their resolve to develop nuclear weapons, nor their intent to wipe Israel off the map. We also know that they, along with Syria, are primary sponsors of terrorism and the continue to supply the “insurgents” in Iraq. We’ve all heard it before, but it’s true: “Those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat it”. This is basically what Bush was saying, and citing a historical example (from before Obama was born) to support it. For Barack to take this as a personal attack is verging on egomaniacal paranoid delusion. Obviously, there is a difference of opinion between Bush (and McCain) versus Obama and Hilary (Reps vs. Dems / Conservatives vs. Liberals) in general regarding how much “diplomacy” is enough, before tough, concrete action is taken. Personally, in matters of such grave consequence, I would rather err on the conservative side (lower-case “c”) and take pre-emptive action to ensure that our worst nightmares do not come to pass while we are at the negotiation table with a regime that has shown itself to be deceitful, untrustworthy and bent on destruction.

Posted by: prm | May 15, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Mike said, “Appeasement or living together never worked in the past” HUH?? Reagan appeased and worked together with the USSR for nearly a decade and brought the Cold War to an end through non-violent strength and diplomacy. Had Reagan chose war there, we’d all be dead. You, and the rest of you neo-conservatives are FOOLS. Your time has come and gone. Never again will your brand of politics be allowed in power in this country.

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

I heard Bush and though he was talking about Carter and Palestinians or Polosi’s visit to Syria. Very interesting that Obama took great offense. I think he has a real self revealed weakness.

Posted by: ballen | May 15, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

if we totally ruled out diplomacy then who would be the Nazis, them or us

Posted by: KnivesofLaird | May 15, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

“we must fight them everywhere”….have ya noticed how indebt we are? have ya noticed the fallen value of hte dollar has made gas prices soar, which makes EVERYTHING more expensivebecause EVERYTHING needs to be transported to a store. This stupid war, this war with the WRONG COUNTRY is making our economy teeter. And do look to history on this one, Greece fell, Rome fell, the USSR fell and Britian fell an ALL from the same thing….DEBT! Debt from what you ask????? wars. well, insurgencies, really. invaded lands with constant uprisings that sucked funds, men, and armory out of hte motherland thereby ruining her. We have finite resources. We are too too far in debt to say ‘forever’ anymore because forever is simply not possible. when you have a full bankaccount you say forever, becaue when the money ran out in Russia, the troops went home. our economy is going south. Vote for whom can fix the economy because when you have no job and unemployment insurance has gone bellly up and you can’t feed yourself or put gas in your car, i promise you, you won’t be giving a s h i t about iraq then.

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Obama is an arrogant weeny…why would he think Bush was talking about him? WHy are all the Dems such tools!

Posted by: Dawn | May 15, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

You know Bill, stop obsessing about skin cancer: I have had it off/on for years and believe me, I AM STILL VERY VIABLE.
Start worrying about your own skin: hideous, revolting, repugnant skin deseases vs. imminent deterioration vs. death occurs from nuclear intrusion.
Accordingly, if the childish, naive Obama wins the presidency…….get ready! His kindergarden talks with Ahmadinijad will provide Iran with the time necessary to improve their nuclear prowess……hey, who knows, maybe that’s the plan!

Posted by: Morgan | May 15, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

For you “clever” people, several Presidents have negotiated with terrorists. Two prominent ones are: Reagan-Iran Contra and Kennedy- Cuban Missile Crisis.
READ A BOOK PEOPLE!

Posted by: i.b.black | May 15, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Ironic. Wasn’t Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush, a banker for the Nazis during WWII????

Posted by: Petra | May 15, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Dignity and office are two words that the anti-Catholic “Catholic” plastic surgery ridden morally bankruptcy hypocrite for the Bay Area should use in any conversation.
Talking did not stop Japan in ’31, Italy in the 30s or Hitler in Munich. Words with might, like RR utilized, moves tyrants. Ms. Pelosi is luckly that GOP in Congress are power hungry cowards willing to “talk” with out making any effort to back action. The live for the scrapes for the socialist left table and approbiation of the dying media.

Posted by: Publius | May 15, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

The platform of the Republican party should be:
*Defend this Nation at any and all costs
*Implement the lind item veto
*Cap tax rates at 20% via a flat tax
*Limit spending to inflation via amendment to Constituion
*Eliminate the birthright for illegal immigrants born on American soil
*Make everyone pay taxes: 20% of income..period! The poor contribute and the wealthy actually will pay “fair” share.
*Limit government to legitimante govt functions as per the preamble to the US Constituion: Providing for of the common defense, protection of civil liberties, and promotion of prosperity: To me this means – Military, courts, and low taxes and small government. If it aint covered in the constitution (i.e. public ed) then it is a states rights issue via the 10th amendment. Keep all spending that way!
Good god!

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

The platform of the Republican party should be:
*Defend this Nation at any and all costs
*Implement the lind item veto
*Cap tax rates at 20% via a flat tax
*Limit spending to inflation via amendment to Constituion
*Eliminate the birthright for illegal immigrants born on American soil
*Make everyone pay taxes: 20% of income..period! The poor contribute and the wealthy actually will pay “fair” share.
*Limit government to legitimante govt functions as per the preamble to the US Constituion: Providing for of the common defense, protection of civil liberties, and promotion of prosperity: To me this means – Military, courts, and low taxes and small government. If it aint covered in the constitution (i.e. public ed) then it is a states rights issue via the 10th amendment. Keep all spending that way!
Good god!

Posted by: Mike | May 15, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

The question is who wrote that speech for him. And Bush for goodness sacks you your brain sometimes.

Posted by: Jay | May 15, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Publius- Gate said “US to develope leverage and then talk with”! Obama said he would talk to them with no restriction!!! When you read a statement make sure you know what you are reading!! Obama will not win the GE even if he selects Hillary (she should not go near him under any circumstances) because white america does not need this piece of dog $%^$
in the white House!! He is a no-nothing idiot with baggage that includes anti-americans and hate mongering pastors! Hillary or McCain
that is the choice

Posted by: pattydaggs | May 15, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Yeah, Obama will take care of your drinking water. Just like he took care of that “environmental legislation” he’s always boasting about! He proposed it, gutted it with rewrites at the behest of his contributing corporations, and it still wasn’t passed into law!
BO believes that voting “present” is standing up for his constituents. Mostly, he doesn’t even bother to show up – like not holding subcommittee hearings on Afghanistan, where we’re spending billions a year – and dying. His excuse: “I’ve been a little busy [running for President]“. He’s been running for the top job before he even got his U.S. Senate office assignment! What a sick joke!

Posted by: Linda Mahoney, Silver Spring, MD | May 15, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

yes, grandpa bush was in bed with Nazi’s. Very foolish little man Bush is to go to Israel to talk about Hitler, the guy who his family supported. such an odd thing to do. i hope some news agency takes him to task on that.

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Dontbesilly: You are woefully misinformed. Barack has the same policies toward HAMAS as McBush has. What he said was that he would never “negotiate out of fear, but he would never be afraid to negotiate.”
Pay attention before you open your pie hole.

Posted by: karen | May 15, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Dontbesilly: You are woefully misinformed. Barack has the same policies toward HAMAS as McBush has. What he said was that he would never “negotiate out of fear, but he would never be afraid to negotiate.”
Pay attention before you open your pie hole.

Posted by: karen | May 15, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

What strikes me as odd that the democrats being large majority of democrats can’t identify with what Bush has said. We have all seen what has happened when we talk – just like we did with Hitler – that is why the democrats lose – they for the most part anti American and very short on memory. The new democrat poster boy Obermann can’t really be an American – he is so full of himself – She should be taken off the air for good. The domocrats are upset? So what

Posted by: a citizen | May 15, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

READ A BOOK, you need to read a book on the cuban missle crisis, kennedy set up a blocade of russian ships. That is action of our military that called the russians bluff.

Posted by: billy bob | May 15, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Kennedy negotiated, but had no freakin’ problem at all backing those words up with lots o’ gun powder as needed. Obama doesn’t seem likely to do the same. Sure he talks tough, but he’s no Kennedy.

Posted by: Fred Gaponzo | May 15, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

I read these comments an realize not every one realizes the motivation of the President of Iran. He believes that he has been chosen to bring about a holocast which will cause the 12th Imam to return. The man is a fanatic. You can not talk an religion fanatic into anything. He calls for the extermination of Israel and the USA. If he gets a A bomb he will use it for the purpose of bringing back the 12th Imam. Don’t all these suicide bombers tell you anything. They think they are going to paradise, So does President Tom.
People are blaming POres Bush for the economy. It was Congress who mandated that the finacial institutions make it easier for low income people to own their own homes. If you remember, the Democrats took over the majority of Congress. That is when things started to get bad. It is unfortunate that there were weak Republicans who went right along with the program.
Peligosi, I call her that because she reminds me of Bela Legosi of vampire movie fame, stated that Pres Bush’s remarks were”below the dignity of the office”. This is from a party leader that thinks that the man who had sex with an intern, molested women and lied before a grand jury is a hero. Duh!
So let us talk with the radical Islamists. There is a verse in the Koran that states it is okay to lie to Jews and infidels if it helps bring about their demise. I paraphrased that. But you get the idea. We talk with them but we won’t be able to believe anything they say. So why expell the CO2? It just contibutes to “global warming”. The only way to win is fight it head on. People say that we should give up and pull out. It is taking too long. Maybe we should abolish some the pro sports teams. When was the last time the Cubs won a World Series? Why do fans keep going to games when their team sucks? Simply because we are Americans and we dont like to give up. We dont like to lose. Every year we keep hoping that things will be better than last year. That is the American spirit. If we had followed the defeatist attitude some Americans have now back in WWII, we would be speaking German or Japanese. Wake up America!! There is a threat to us out there that wants to destroy us. Talking will get us DEAD!!

Posted by: Rick | May 15, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Forgive me if I sound stupid here.
But everyone that advocates “diplomacy” … could start by being a little more diplomatic about criticizing the president.
As the saying goes, diplomacy is just the art of saying “nice doggie” until you find a rock.
I don’t think that strategy has changed in the last 10,000 years of civilization.

Posted by: oracle2world | May 15, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Obama has been indoctrinated with Black Liberation Theology from the wrong-headed Rev. Wright for over 2 decades. It’s credo is Blacks are superior to Whites and should dominate society. Remember Black Power in the 60′s? Well Mr. O is a modern day, affirmative action educated angry Black man. And his wife is a reincarnation of Angela Davis from the 60′s. I’ll wager that if he gets in, all you wonderful liberals better get ready for paying “reparations” to Blacks in this country.

Posted by: obanyan | May 15, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Pelosi, you are beneath the office you hold.

Posted by: Sandi Lujan | May 15, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

what is it with far right wingers and WWII. how many more wars have we been in before nad after WWII but everytime they talk of war they reach back to that one war with has nothing to do with anything today. it’s as though they learned that 2 + 2 = 4 and forever more when they see a plus sign they instantly shout “Four! the answer is four!”

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

…as if we haven’t been using diplomacy for years (not just the U.S., but the U.N. as well). Don’t act as though we are the war-mongers, just because we’ve tried everything and are coming to the clear revelation that Iran is not open to negotiation and will continue down the path to nuclear arms (for their self-proclaimed aim of obliterating Israel) unabated unless we take some strong action. Once Iran develops nuclear weapons, they will be the ones instigating war, but they will then be in a much more powerful position. Pre-emptive action against such an aggressive regime could save many more lives than continuing with our clearly ineffective attempts at negotiation. Again, harken back to the Hitler example…what if the nations had taken action to stop him before he developed his massive navy, airforce and land forces…think of the millions of lives that would have been saved. Don’t think you’re compassionate because you’re Liberal… you could very well be doing more harm than good, and inadvertently be advancing the cause of those with evil intent at the expense of the innocent.

Posted by: prm | May 15, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Obama is unelectable, the DNC needs to nominate Senator Clinton or we will have another 4 years of Republican corruption. Bush and Cheney have been bleeding the country for 7 years.

Posted by: libre | May 15, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Politico dot com
BenSmith
Blog Posts
McCain supporters needed to attack Obama
Liberal blog

Posted by: Help Needed | May 15, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Mike,
No “flat tax”.
Go to fair tax dot org.
The current tax system is a boon for control freaks.
Have a good one!

Posted by: Jeff in sherwood | May 15, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

When Obama referred to all “57″ States was he really thinking about Heinz 57 Sauce or possibly a Freudian slip regarding the so-called “57 Islamic States?”

Posted by: Todd | May 15, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

I.b.black- Talk about reading a book once in a while. JFK did not negotiate with terrorists. He gave the USSR an ultimatum which said they must remove their nuclear missiles from Cuba or risk war. He then imposed a naval blockade.

Posted by: dls | May 15, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

ah, no, wehaven’t been using diplomacy. not even close. Margaret Thatcher was like bush and she only got more attacks on her. John major was alot like Obama, he came after Thatcher and he was the one who opened the dialogue that made the peace that is a reality today in IReland. Thatcher and her ‘we do not negotiate with terrorists’ shpeel was a complete failure. dialogue works. obama could do this much much better.

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Saw a documentary on WW2 vets talking about how they did not usally take Japanese prisoners, they just shot them. Can you imagine how todays dems and MSM would react to that?

Posted by: billy bob | May 15, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Vote for Obama = Vote for Iran/Terrorists/Muslims. Are Americans that stupids? I am not, at least.

Posted by: dave2008elect | May 15, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Obviously, many of you have never served your country let alone been beaten to a coma (literally) by the staffs of extremist Islamics and lived to tell about it. Vote McCaine!

Posted by: Veteran US Navy | May 15, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Well I sure hate to bust some peoples bubble. Most Jews again to my surprise that I talked to told me we can’t have a blackman as president. Hello! And whats going on in Harlem,New york with the gentification of neighborhoods there kicking black families out of their houses and realitor signs just happen to have Jewish Names on it! Hello! Oh! Thats just economics! I do know my history and I know there are thousands of great Jewish people that contributed civil rights and died in there efforts but to say We can’t have a black president in the White House from the Majority that I’ve talked to is over the top this day in age espeacially coming from Jewish people. Also to say someone can not critic Jews because thats Racism Thats over the top and ELITIST! That in it self sounds like Facsism! If there was a Jewish Politician running for President I would vote for him. I think a Jewish President would be good for this country. But not to vote for him because the color of his skin that is pure Racism!

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

jfk gave up some useless bases i Turkey. it was a negotiation. READ! Read about john major while you’re at it, and Thatcher’s ‘we do not negotiate with terrorists’ theory. Who’s worked??? Diplomacy worked. there is peace in ireland today becuase some young guy came after the right wing nut job and opened up dialogue with thousand year old enemies.

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Hey, Barrack, baby, If the shoe fits !

Posted by: Rick | May 15, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Hey, Barrack, baby, If the shoe fits !

Posted by: Rick | May 15, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

jessboston… the topic is IRAN, not the IRA.

Posted by: prm | May 15, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

dont flatter yourself, dave200, you’re not that bright.

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I agree with Bush for the first time and I am a democrat who will NOT vote for a terrorist, anti-semite!
If you wish to confirm why Bush made those remarks, Obama has a call center in Gaza in an area under Hamas control! He is getting volunteer cmapign help from the terrorists! All internet access is moderated and monitored by Hamas! please go and google
Gaza’s Obama campaign!

Posted by: Al | May 15, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

FOOD FOR THOUGHT ===============
Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?
Is North Korea not supposed to be part of the axis of evil along with Iran & Syria?
Why is Bush negotiating with the Iraqi insurgents? Have they ceased to be terrorists?
Hypocrisy!!!

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Didn’t President Reagan speak to the Russians.

Posted by: john | May 15, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

I cannot believe how many people are against Obama… Why? Anything other than G W is better than GW! Reading all comments I must say that this country is very racially divided. Unbelievable… but it is 21st century and not the days of slavery… Wake Up America…

Posted by: Natalija | May 15, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

I cannot believe how many people are against Obama… Why? Anything other than G W is better than GW! Reading all comments I must say that this country is very racially divided. Unbelievable… but it is 21st century and not the days of slavery… Wake Up America…

Posted by: Natalija | May 15, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

For you “clever” people, several Presidents have negotiated with terrorists. Two prominent ones are: Reagan-Iran Contra and Kennedy- Cuban Missile Crisis.
READ A BOOK PEOPLE!

Posted by: i.b.black | May 15, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

For you “clever” people, several Presidents have negotiated with terrorists. Two prominent ones are: Reagan-Iran Contra and Kennedy- Cuban Missile Crisis.
READ A BOOK PEOPLE!

Posted by: i.b.black | May 15, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

I cannot believe how many people are against Obama… Why? Anything other than G W is better than GW! Reading all comments I must say that this country is very racially divided. Unbelievable… but it is 21st century and not the days of slavery… Wake Up America…

Posted by: Natalija | May 15, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

My son was in Iraq and he does not aggree with anything the News or Obama says. After being over there he says it is better for us to fight them on thier ground, not ours. Everything he learned overthere makes him believe if we leave they will follow. There is no talking with those people.

Posted by: LINDA | May 15, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

For pete’s sake cut the Muslim references all ready. He’s NOT muslim and you know it. Its all a PATHETIC attempt at instilling fear in American voters. He’s going to win the election. Deal with it. What’s important now is that we keep him to his word. We CANNOT afford to allow 4000 more of our babies die in Iraq. 5 years 500 billion dollars and the mess isn’t getting any better. John McCain wants more of that. And since Hillary couldn’t pull it off, Obama is our best hope. Stop the crap and let’s get behind the guy.

Posted by: noizlevel | May 15, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

prm, the topic is bush’s foriegn policy, go the top. Bush said history showed us that diplomacy doesn’t work, becuase he, how shockly, only knows about one conflict, like most right wingers WWII. What a homogenious christian german society has to do with ethnically and religious terrorism and rogue nations i have no idea, that’s what you people keep doing. i f you want to look at rogue groups and how nations came to peace with them, you will see dialogue dialogue dialogue. Bush is like Thatcher. Obama is like John MAjor. And history shows us there is peace in Ireland and England today beause of John Major. Thatcher only made things worse. Bush relalky should stop embarressing himself and get off his WWII obsession.

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

I cannot believe how many people are against Obama… Why? Anything other than G W is better than GW! Reading all comments I must say that this country is very racially divided. Unbelievable… but it is 21st century and not the days of slavery… Wake Up America…

Posted by: Natalija | May 15, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Pubius – we didn’t win the cold war through talks. remember, that was the idea of the nutty left. we won by building lots of arms and scaring the Russians into backing down.
btw – islamic fundamentalists and nazis is a good analogy. you are the one out of touch, idiot.

Posted by: werty | May 15, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

How can Sen. Barack Obama challenge President Bush? Sen. Obama has lot of George Bush in him! Sen. Obama himself made several notable gaffes, just few days ago. They have become a part of his political persona. He said;
“We should send Arab specking interpreters to Afghanistan!”
(Afghans don’t speak Arabic!)
In the same breath he said he made another gaffe about “agricultural experts” These are besides his gaffes about” I’ve been to all 57 states…”
“100 million dies in Myanmar!”
“She was punished with a baby…!”
And just yesterday, he called a news reporter, “Sweetie!”
If elected president Sen. Barack Obama is going to be even worse than George W. Bush!

Posted by: charleychaplin | May 15, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

And there is nothing wrong with the presidents statement. Until these last few years, that point was understood and accepted.
It is Obama who made a political attack. It is Obama who has politicized this comment.

Posted by: James Callahan | May 15, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

FOOD FOR THOUGHT ===============
Why is Bush negotiating with North Korea at the moment if talking to our enemies is sooooo bad?
Is North Korea not supposed to be part of the axis of evil along with Iran & Syria?
Why is Bush paying and negotiating with the Iraqi insurgents? Have they ceased to be terrorists?
Hypocrisy!!!

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Senator Obama says, “I have attended the same church for the past twenty years and was baptized as a Christian in the church”.
Senator Obama says, “If you want to know where I stand, just check my record for the past twenty years”.
Senator Obama says, “I gained foriegn policy experience when I visited Pakistan and Kenya”.
The Senator’s campaign staff dismissed the trip to Pakistan, as a trip when the Senator was in between colleges in 1981. He accompanied a college friend to Pakistan to visit his home, according to the spokesman.
It is curious that Pakistan in 1981 was ruled by martial law and Westerners were not very welcome there. The Mujahadeen and millions of Afghan refugees were living in Pakistan while they fought against the Soviet occupation. Pakistan of the eighties resembled “Dodge City” of the old West, with thirteen year olds toting around AK-47s.
There were only three reasons I can think of why a young Western man would be granted a Visa to Pakistan at that time and welcomed to a country on the State Department banned travel list:
1. To participate in Jihad, which is the duty of every true believer.
2. Attendance at a Whabbi Sect run Madrassa, for religious education.
3. To collaborate with Islamic fundamentalists on how to infiltrate politics in the West.
If you were to check the fund raising FEC records of Senator Obama, it is amazing how much money he has raised and how many donors are Muslims. It makes you wonder, how much of that money passed through the Wahala banking system into his campaign coffers?

Posted by: Guam Rob | May 15, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

“…we here highly resolve that these honored dead shall not have died in vain; that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom and this government, of the people, by the people and for the people, shall not perish from the earth” Not if we keep listening to the liberals! We cannot make happy talk with terrorist.

Posted by: PKahnPie | May 15, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

If 9/11 was Bill’s fault, who’s fault will it be if it happens again on Obamas watch?

Posted by: The Answer | May 15, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

George Bush knows a lot about Nazi Tanks. His Granddaddy Prescott helped the Nazis finance them. If only FDR had thrown the scoundrel in jail instead of just seizing his Bank, how much better the world would be.

Posted by: Andrew Riley | May 15, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Livefreeordie @
I agree with you but I am going with Ralph Nader!

Posted by: David | May 15, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Man this guy, Obama is such a WIMP!
No wonder Hamas wants him to be Prez!

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

It is not an accident that there has not been a terrorist attach in the United States since 9/11. It is because we took the war to them. If we back out they will come back. The terrorists have stated they have one goal in mind – an Islamic world.
In regard to Iran, don’t worry about them. Israel will nuke them when they get close to making a bomb.

Posted by: Frank | May 15, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

It is not an accident that there has not been a terrorist attach in the United States since 9/11. It is because we took the war to them. If we back out they will come back. The terrorists have stated they have one goal in mind – an Islamic world.
In regard to Iran, don’t worry about them. Israel will nuke them when they get close to making a bomb.

Posted by: Frank | May 15, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Sisto Maxima: You seem to carry on the mantra of Obama supporters that say anyone who does not vote for him is a racist. The very generalizations you make about Jews are the essence of bigotry. Can you not understand that Obama belonged to a church that gave its lifetime achievement award to Farrakhan. Farrakhan said Hitler was a great man. Gee, imagine that some Jews might be a little put off by that.

Posted by: beo | May 15, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

We are a Nation of Peace. The should be our goal with every country. It is not easy to talk peace with a gun in your face. I see that the 28% of Bush supporter flocked to this article to comment. I have a question to all of you who think that we are safe here becuse our troops are in Iraq.
How many years was it between the tower bombings? These guys will take their time and strike when they feel the time is right. None of the supposed plots to attack American have panned out to be true. Just like all the reasons for going into Iraq in the first place. It only takes 1 person to cause great loss in this country and you folks are acting like they can’t afford one martor. That is completely ignorant.
Keep living in the fear that Bush has created. So I the other 72% of the country that don’t believe in this crazy presidents policies don’t have this nations best interest at hart.
We are in the worst shape this country has ever been in my life time of 40yrs and it is because of this president and his policies. I guess some people just like it this way.

Posted by: texas outlaw | May 15, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Bush being and idiot does not make senator Obama a superior president.
It is about time for all of us to stop worshipping Obama,
it is about time to see a real picture: a inexperienced political demagogue who never worked for living in his life.

Posted by: alex | May 15, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Obama is so touchy. Too touchy for me to vote for him for President or anything else.

Posted by: Skip T. | May 15, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

What an idiot Bush is.
Who does he think is buying this crap.
Unfortunately the idiots on this thread?
Wake up people – the republican party is a dead issue…done, ruined by you fools.
mCBUSH HAS NO CHANCE
PLUS HE’S A COWARD TRAITOR WHO SOLD HIS COUNTRY OUT.

Posted by: sumo | May 15, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Wow – things are getting loopy here. A black person is accusing the Jews of being bigoted? This is the action that obama stimulates from people. Can you actually believe this? And the obama followers are supposed to be better educated than the Clinton followers? You sure couldn’t prove this by the comments made on this blog. Good heavens – where are these people from and who is giving them their information? This country is so divided by the obama racist driven campaign, that we don’t have to worry about the M.E. terrorist destroying it – the obama radicals are starting to do a great job right here. Why is there no CIA, FBI, Special Agent, etc, etc investigation? This is internal Not External terrorism. Why are we allowing this? The obama followers are loopy.

Posted by: Lou | May 15, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Truth be told, the Democrats are seething because President Bush told it like it is. The Democrats are doing their darndest to shield Obama from criticism about his lack of foreign policy experience, domestic policy experience, and his lack of experience, period. Ever heard of the expression, “Thou doth protest too much?” If what President Bush said wasn’t so true, so on the mark, do you think John Kerry and company, would have come out swinging? It was so important that President Bush made his speech before the Knesset on the 60th Anniversary of the State of Israel. He made it crystal clear that history will not be repeated and that Israel will not have to worry about Bozo Barak sitting down with terroists, if he should be voted in. If, G-d forbid, he is nominated for President, mark my words, the day after his Inauguration, expect an attack on American soil that will make 9/11 look like child’s play. Then what, Mr. Obama. What words could you possibly say to the American people when their country is in flames.

Posted by: Momick | May 15, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Obama won’t be able to carry NY now! Jews will NOT go for Obama!
60 birthday of Israel a string message to the Jewish Americans!
Thank U Bush! I agree first time!

Posted by: Rachel | May 15, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

If you want people to stop dying in vain then stop electing president who get us into frivolous wars. To make more people die in vain because there were these other guys who died in vain doens’t make anyone of them die for a reason. The reasons is the problem, not that we haven’t sent enough to their deaths. Iraq was never a threat to us, they still aren’t. They’ve been fighting eachother for thousands of years. Letthem continue. Bring the troops home. if those who fought died in vain then shame on the president for being so f u c k ing stupid as to think he could shove a non-muslim democracy down the throat of a middle eastern nation. The idea was stupid to begin with. So soldiers dying in vain falls on your head and on his head for sending them to their deaths under such an enormously stupid premise.

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

People who believe we never talk to radicals do not know history. Period.
Bush himself has made a deal with Muammar Gaddafi of Libya. Bush has made deals with North Korea for them to halt their nuke program. Reagan’s admininstration got our hostages returned from Iran by selling them arms (Iran Contra Affair). Reagan had talks with the Soviets. John McCain met with Vietnamese officials to help normalize our relations with Vietnam. Nixon visited China to help open them to the West. After World War 2, we worked closely with former Nazis in order to stabilize (what later became) Western Germany. Everyone from Reagan, to Clinton, to Bush have met with radical Palestinians. During the Iraq-Iran War in the 90′s, Donald Rumsfeld personally met with Saddam Hussein because we supported Saddam in that war. During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, we supported the radical Islamists and sent them weapons.
This notion that you can’t ever talk with groups you don’t like is not supported by history.

Posted by: Historian | May 15, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

SO…..what exactly is so wrong with what he said?
I don’t see any real argument in the article from the Dems on why what he said was offensive or anything.

Posted by: Ryan | May 15, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Throw a stone into a pack of dogs and the only one that howls is the one who is hit.

Posted by: Sandiman | May 15, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

When I first read the article, I thought we was referring to Olmert. If Pelosi & company thinks it hit to close to home, then so be it.

Posted by: VM0311 | May 15, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

It blows me away every time to here Reb. talk about how the US would be disaster if Obama were elected. Give me a break! We’ve just went though the WORST 8 years in the history of this country. We are bankrupt, we have created more terrorist then we’ve stopped, we have short changed our democracy, we have neglected our own troops and our citizens. Mr Bush has failed on very poss. level. What Reb. need is a very long time out, in the corner, alone, with out a word being spoken. The citizens of the US and the people of the world have had enough of your B.S.

Posted by: Slycat | May 15, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Here come the left wing wacko’s. Did you Unemployed Losers finally get up out of bed?
Here’s the Truth, read it and WEEP SCUMBAGS!
In just one year . Remember the election in 2006?
Thought you might like to read the following:
A little over a year and a half ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 ½ year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.
Since voting in The New Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate
(stock and mu tual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!
Remember it’s Congress that makes law not the President. He has to work
with what’s handed to him.
Quote of the Day……..’My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the
history of the world. I hope you’ll join with me as we try to change it.’
– Barack Obama
Part 2:
Taxes… Whether Democrat or a Republican you will find these statistics
enlightening and amazing.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html
Taxes under Clinton 1999 Taxes under Bush 2008
Single making 30K – tax $8,400 Single making 30K – tax $4,500
Single making 50K – tax $14,000 Single making 50K – tax $12,500
Single making 75K – tax $23,250 Single making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 60K – tax $16,800 Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K – tax $21,000 Married making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 125K – tax $38,750 Married making 125K – tax $31,250
Both democratic candidates will return to the higher tax rates
It is amazing how many people that fall into the categories above think
Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President ever. If
Obama or Hillary are elected, they both say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts
and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can’t
wait for it to happen. This is like the movie The Sting with Paul Newman; you
scam somebody out of some money and they don’t even know what happened.

Posted by: TG | May 15, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

frank, you know, this statement about ‘taking the war to them’ is just so stupid!!! London got attacked and they are in iraq nad afghanistan! Spain got attacked and they were in iraq and afghanistan. We didn’t get attacked because AQ decided to attack other western countries. that’s it. if htye had their sights on us, they would have gotton us. We cna maybe fend off some attacks but if they are determined they will get us just like thye got spain and britian and ‘being there’ does not stop them from sending 10 guys over to do a mission!

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

To Dave C.,
Dave, Dave, Dave, what are you afraid of. we are coming off eight years of conservative cut taxes, deregulate, talk tough and shoot first policy and it has put the country in the crapper! Conservatives have had it all their way with a GOP Congress and President. Why does Obama scare you? Are you worried something might go right for the U.S of A?

Posted by: Bea Reasonable | May 15, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

If this country wants to win the war, we have to get a democrat in there. WWI–Wilson (D) win, WWII–Truman (D) win, Korean War–Eisenhower (R) Loss, Vietnam War–Nixon/Ford(R) Loss, Iraq War–Bush (R) losing so far (more money and time spent than in WWII).
It’s clear–if you want to lose a war, vote Republican. If you want to win, vot for a Democrat.

Posted by: RepublicanWimp | May 15, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Maybe we should do like Bush, and McCain wants to do and just bomb all the countries we don’t like! You see how well that worked with Iraq, now we have over 4000 US soldiers dead, up to a million innocent Iraqi children, and their parents dead. So maybe McCain should follow Bush’s example and bomb Iran, and Syria, and Palestine, and whomever else we decide we don’t like, and send 12,000 more US soldiers to those countries to die, who cares if innocent children, die, and have their country ripped apart and their family members killed, just as long as the US gets to run around playing with their big bombs, which they’ve apparently mistaken for toys.
We already know that Bush is an idiot, and McCain is a walking talking nightmare.
It seems McCain has also forgotten his past, that he is no war hero, he is actually one of the only soldiers who were captured by the Vietnamese who decided to cooperated with the communist Vietnamese government, making 32 propaganda tapes for them, as well as giving interviews in which he spoke disrespectful of the USA. And he must have also forgotten that he got special treament for cooperating with the enemy.
McCain is the last person who should have ANY say in where our brave soldiers go to fight, and give up their lives.
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/02/17/in-1992-pows-accused-mccain-of-collaborating-with-vietnamese/

Posted by: Sarah | May 15, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Does anybody find how disgusting Nancy Pelosi is like i do? Yeah, good idea, let’s rip apart our own president for the world to watch every chance we can. that’s seems like it works

Posted by: avg guy | May 15, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

“Beneath the dignity of the office of the President.” ??????
As opposed to what Bill Clinton did in the Oval Office?
This country deserves what it gets when it elects people like the Clintons and Pelosi’s.

Posted by: Ksera Sugarmail | May 15, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

“Could some of the smart democrats point out where there have been successes in talking with aggressors to get them to stop without using the threat of military action?”
– Robert Smith
Kennedy Talked to the Soviets during the Cuban Missile crisis. The Soviets backed down.

Posted by: Matt | May 15, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

“Beneath the dignity of the office of the President.” ??????
As opposed to what Bill Clinton did in the Oval Office?
This country deserves what it gets when it elects people like the Clintons and Pelosi’s.

Posted by: Ksera Sugarmail | May 15, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

If you throw a rock into a pack of dogs, the one that gets hit is the one that yells. Listen to who is yelling the loudest.

Posted by: Tony | May 15, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Funny how people seem to be on the defensive from Christians who claim to be Christians – but have never really read the Bible. Jesus said nobody took his life, that he laid it down himself. He died to save us. Nobody could have killed him if he didn’t allow it. It was his purpose in life.
Also, the Bible says if you be Christ’s, then you’re Abraham’s seed. Abraham was Jewish. If you’re a “Christian” according to the Bible, then you’re of Jewish decent. If you’re gonna start a fight, at least know what you’re talking about.

Posted by: Da Freak | May 15, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Any President who negociates with a terrorist state like North Korea should be impeached. Impeach Bush now!

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

“Obviously, many of you have never served your country let alone been beaten to a coma (literally) by the staffs of extremist Islamics and lived to tell about it. Vote McCaine!”
It would help if you knew how to spell the name of the man you support.
“Vote for Obama = Vote for Iran/Terrorists/Muslims. Are Americans that stupids?”
The “stupids” one is you. You don’t know a lick about politics, AND you’ve got the typing skills of a 4th grader.
“Forgive me if I sound stupid here.
But everyone that advocates “diplomacy” … could start by being a little more diplomatic about criticizing the president.”
You sound stupid here. Go look up the definition of patriotism and tell me it doesn’t apply to calling your leaders when they do bad things for the country. If this was colonial times, you’d be a loyalist who supported King George.
“Everyone say it out loud right now:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!!!!”
Doesn’t sound as scary as George W Bush, which is what we get if you vote for John McCain.
“WHat they ultimately want is for the U.N. laws to supercede our Constitution.”
Ohh here we go with the idiot fearmongering neocons building up their strawmen.
The comments on here are more retarded than on you tube videos, and that is saying A LOT.
Still waiting for W to find Bin Laden by the way… the Decider and Protector seems to be incompetent at both those tasks.

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Obama Helped Supporters Get Millions in Illinois State Busines. He is corrupt besides unelectable. Does he plan to sell federal funded projects to his donors for money too? Hillary cLINTON SHOULD RUN AS iNDEPENDENT. Te DNC obviously is throwing the GE with Obama.

Posted by: libre | May 15, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

“Could some of the smart democrats point out where there have been successes in talking with aggressors to get them to stop without using the threat of military action?”
– Robert Smith
Kennedy Talked to the Soviets during the Cuban Missile crisis. The Soviets backed down.

Posted by: Matt | May 15, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Obama is going to Steam Roll into the White House! The earth is shaking for the Neo-Con Repulican fascists. Old man McCain’s knees are shaking so bad he needs Lieberman to help him walk!
! BREAKING NEWS: Nanny Lieberman changes McCain’s diapers. GOP in Crisis! Bush is Bushed by own Party!
West Virginia declared Worst People in the World!
BUSH QUITS GOLF IN SOLIDARITY OF THE TROOPS THAT DIED IN IRAQ – Bush squirrel monkey should lock himself in the basement until Jan,20th,2009 and do humanity a favor.

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

sandiman, but if the stone misses them all, you can bet the entire pack will be ticked at you and will soon come after you wanting blood.

Posted by: jessboston | May 15, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

John McCain: ‘There WILL NOT BE a Second Holocaust under my watch!!!’
Right on, Brother!
I don’t agree with McCain on a lot of things…
But Cutting Government Pork-Barrel Spending, keeping taxes low and a Strong Foreign Policy had me at ‘Hello’

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Obama attacks Bush for stating facts. He said he wanted to talk to Iran. Obam takes everything that anyone says that is a fact not in his favor as a personal attack or racism. How long before he calls Bush along with the Clintons racist for daring to criticize by stating obvious facts? Anyone who has the audacity to take issue with his preposterous and dangerous talks with Iran is harming his ego. It is appeasement, Bush is right.

Posted by: cookiecrumbles | May 15, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Posted by: Bea Reasonable | May 15, 2008 3:09:42 PM
GOP Congress and President?
You Moron Liberals have destroyed everything in 18 Months you IDIOT!
Remember you took control of the Senate and Congress because you wanted change?
It’s change you got MORON!

Posted by: TG | May 15, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Obama Helped Supporters Get Millions in Illinois State Business
Now we now how he “arranged” his “bundlers” for millions of campaign money. Clinton should runindependent. The DNC is betting on a corrupt and unelectable candidate.

Posted by: libre | May 15, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Obama, Pelosi, and the Defeatocratic Party are repeating history. Neville Chamberlain stated that “We have peace in our time!” A few weeks later Sir Winston Churchill was left to pick up the pieces, while Nazi bombers kicked the crap out of London. Millions of people died needlessly because of jerks like Chamberlain. This time it’ll be with nukes and billions of dead people, killed by jerks like Obama and Pelosi. (I would point out that San Francisco is over-due for a Sodom-like judgment.)

Posted by: Craig A. Myers | May 15, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Hey numbskull, if you are ever going to have peace in this world you have to talk to everybody, not just those you like. You solution is to kill everybody that doesn’t see everything your way, then you’ll have a bunch of people to kill. Start with those in Russia, China, the whole middle east, Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela, and others in South America. Gee, that’s a heck of alot of people to do in, like most of the world. No, don’t think they are just going to sit around while we do them in, more likely we’ll be gone long before then. I still don’t know how you think peace can be had with your enemies if you don’t talk to them.

Posted by: Jake | May 15, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

“The Israelis were probably snickering at the fool. Bush sounds ignorant of the fact that Israel was formed out of acts of terror. ”
===============
I’ve been to Palestine and I’ve been to Israel, and I respect the people in both, as well as their respective struggles for creation of a homeland-State.
However, your “facts” are incorrect. Israel was formed out of a UN Plan, and the 1948 War which resulted was initiated by the Arab states:
“The newly-created United Nations approved the UN Partition Plan (United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181) on November 29, 1947, dividing the country into two states, one Arab and one Jewish. Jerusalem was to be designated an international city – a corpus separatum – administered by the UN to avoid conflict over its status.[51] The Jewish community accepted the plan,[52] but the Arab League and Arab Higher Committee rejected it.[53]
Regardless, the State of Israel was proclaimed on May 14, 1948, one day before the expiry of the British Mandate for Palestine.[54] Not long after, five Arab countries – Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq – attacked Israel, launching the 1948 Arab-Israeli War”

Posted by: study world history please | May 15, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

what a wonder america would be without the liberal worms that have infested it. Some day liberalism will be treated for the sickness it is and cured. Think of what america would be without these insane freeloaders.

Posted by: some day | May 15, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Tina Fresno: you would vote for Bush again without thinking. I’m pretty sure “not thinking” is how you spend your life. Bush is the worst president this country has ever had, and hopefully will ever have.

Posted by: Robb | May 15, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Looks like the Big political “O”, has a guilty conscious. Dub throws a rock over the fence, and Big “O”, yelps that it hit him? It was actually aimed at Mr. Peanut, but Big “O” yelps. Must be that middle-name thing again, making him super sensitive.
The Big political “O” has got the Hammas vote, so why is he bitchin?
:)

Posted by: KaliKid | May 15, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Bush was correct and no amount of whining from the left will change that fact. Obama is an appeaser or worse, a sympathizer.

Posted by: rplat | May 15, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

We need the strategic oil reserves to be released. That will give us leverage on Iran.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 15, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

“As opposed to what Bill Clinton did in the Oval Office?”
I find it disgusting that people in this country that a president getting oral in the oval office is a bigger problem than a president lying and getting 4000 AMERICAN soldiers killed in Iraq.
I think we should send all the warmongers over there and see how they like fighting, because it sure is easy for them to sound tough behind a computer screen.

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

The only thing the terrorists understand is force. We should help the Israelis send them to heaven faster. The savages have been firing rckets into sedrot(southern Israel) for years now. If mexico was doing that, we would have nuked them by now.

Posted by: Emeka | May 15, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Barack also said he would go to war with Iran if the talks don’t work and if he has credible information.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 15, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Dear Citizens:
I am a neocon, therefore I lie, obfuscate and slander at will. But it’s OK since I am doing it for the greater good.
My zombie McCain Mr. Rove made for me in South Carolina in 2000 will keep the status quo quite nicely.
Back to sleep America and remember anyone who disagrees with anything my administration does is unpatriotic.
Signed, Your Protector, George Bush
P.S. See you on the links…oops I forgot I gave that up to support the troops.

Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | May 15, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Obama feeling a little guilty about his
comments. You revolve around the Sun not
the other way around.

Posted by: magus | May 15, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Releasing the reserves will not fix the oil issue. FULL OUT drilling right now in Alaska and off the east and west coast will make oil prices drop like a rock. This is the LIBERALS in the government that are stopping this and keeping oil prices high, put the blame where it is due.

Posted by: oil | May 15, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Obama feeling a little guilty about his
comments. You revolve around the Sun not
the other way around.

Posted by: magus | May 15, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Someone asked what is wrong with what he said.
Fear mongering is what is wrong with it.
He brings up the scarriest leader of modern times to invoke fear in people and it obviously works on many of you that have commented on this post.
He is accusing many in this country of being defetist and whimps becase we want diplomacy. Sometimes the real coragous are the ones that choose not to fight. Bush does not care who dies neither does Cheney, remember the “so” comment that Cheney made. Both of them just want to keep cashing in on this war for as long as they can and all you frightend little children are supporting them. Go ahead and live your life in fear and see where it gets yyou.

Posted by: texas outlaw | May 15, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

You guys have to be joking me. Obama rill ruin this country, divide us between races like his minister and let all the terrorists run amuck…
Go Clinton!!!

Posted by: johny smith | May 15, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Democrats are MAD
at Bush’s speech
because they
most certainly DO
plan on Appeasing the
TERRORISTS
in the world;
Particularly Palestinians and Iranians,
because they (Demorats)
believe them to be freedom fighters and Patriots.

Posted by: Elijah | May 15, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

The Three Stooges in the White House want to BOMB,BOMB,BOMB the world into a giant parking lot so Americans can go there and GO SHOPPING. This of course after Haliburton and Blackberry makes a KILLING from Killing
and Torturing women and children who just happen to be Muslim. I think Haliburton will torture and kill their own families for profit. Like Rat Lice! McCain loves Haliburton!

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

*sigh*
You pro-Bush/pro-McCain folks, who are gaily throwing confetti about in the wake of Bush’s stupid remarks, have obviously learned zero during the past 7 years.
How long will the people in this country keep swallowing the Bush-Cheney’s fear tactics? Think, people. It’s the money. It’s the oil. It’s corporations like Halliburton and Blackwater raking in massive profits. It’s the fear they our leaders instill that you allows them to keep us from thinking, and to go on raping this country and its Constitution. Look at a just a portion of the damage so far: from $4 per gallon gas and rising, to massive home foreclosures and econmic disaster, to trashing the environment, to thousands of Americans killed in an illegal war fought on the basis of lies (re: we are not the liberators, but the occupiers in Iraq! Our sole reason for toppling Sadaam and lying about his ties to 9-11 were to secure their oil for ourselves!) Think!
You confetti-throwers, jeering the Democratic voices for change, are the sort who could easily vote for 4 more of the same, if that’s what it takes to keep a black man out of the oval office.
Think, people. Think. It’s not too late to learn the facts about what’s really been going on in this country for the past 7 years.

Posted by: katzooks | May 15, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

The Japanese were in the white house waiting for a diplomacy meeting when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and killed many people!! So much for conversation!

Posted by: pattydaggs | May 15, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

LOL!!! You’re all funny!
CAN’T WE JUST ALL GET ALONG?!!!!!
Peace,
JESUS WAS A LIBERAL, HE WASN’T WHITE AND HE LOVED HIS ENEMY! Would you have voted for him?

Posted by: rebelyell | May 15, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Maybe some of you need to listen to what Obama really says. Listen to him … his idols where Malcom X and the Very Reverand Wright. Opps he had to dump Wright for a little bit. In his words he talks of Malcom X wanting all the white blood out of his body and good old Obama agrees. Obama is a Marxist. We are losing all our freedoms to these nuts on the far left, known as Democrats. And maybe the guy of “knowledge” on Bush’s grandfather might like to know that during world war 2, nothing top secret could go thru the American Embassy be cause good old Joe Kennedy was a great admirer of Hitler. Isn’t that Teddy Kennedy’s pappy.

Posted by: SR Williams | May 15, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Bush is such a loser…. I can’t believe any of you losers still listen to him. Why go to the Knesset and let them pull his chain, haven’t they got us in enough trouble. About sixty years of trouble.

Posted by: MainMan | May 15, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

I don’t know why Bush’s incompetence always amazes me — isn’t there something about the president not airing dirty laundry while traveling in the name of the United States of America??
Is this Rove’s attempt to divert everyone from talking about Mississippi and the inept Republican party

Posted by: paulet | May 15, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Geez, doesn’t look like Bush mentioned Barry at all. Talk about protesting too much!
Soft people usually have thicker skin!

Posted by: chris | May 15, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

President Bush has fielded the best protected Military force ever assembled in the history of mankind and held terror attacks against our Nation in check since he made his speech to Congress after 9/11.
Call it what you want, but this is a demonstration of true leadership.
As a retired member of the World’s best military, I will tell you that we did not have the same confidence in our leaders during the Carter or Clinton administrations.
If you were to take issue with my first statement, just check the facts. Members of the military today have a better chance of being killed or injured outside of the War Zones, than they do inside the battle areas.

Posted by: Guam Rob | May 15, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Every Atheist in America who HATES GOD
will vote for Obama regardless that he
(Obama) is flaunting Religion.
If he were a Republican there’d be uproar of such
the world has never seen!
Even the Devil and his demons know their Master!!!

Posted by: Elijah | May 15, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Folks: Obama says Roosevelt and Truman negotiated with and talked with our enemies when he faced Blitzer last week, proving it would be prudent to talk with Iran. But Roosevelt never negotiated with Hitler, Tojo or Mussolini–he demanded unconditional surrender.Truman did not negotiate with North Korea–he landed on Inchon and saved South Korea.Obama will get us killed because our adversaries will believe they can push him around.

Posted by: peter huessy | May 15, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Bush is Right!
Obama is Wright!
Any questions?

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

WOW! We don’t want a black man that is wanting to talk to Dictators. I love this country I grew up in but why is everything always racist. The color of a persons skin can’t tell you what a person is like. Example: Bush has changed the world to where people are wondering how to feed there kids as well as how to get to work with the gas prices, according to some this is not his fault ( why is he still borrowing money). Clinton was a womenizer in the white house. I guarantee noone saw that coming. Grow up people, racism is not becoming of real Americans and to all those fake ones who still think that bringing up race will stop the future from changing for the better, we appreciate it because it only helps us to fight that much harder and to become stronger.
VOTE
BETTER AMERICA 2008
Don’t expect the worst because of the color of a persons skin, I grew up thinking that about white people, but guess what I GREW UP.

Posted by: Kim | May 15, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Lies the Liberals have told the American people:
Man Made global warming (Al Gore is the new PT Barnum)
Oil Companies keeping iol high (Liberals not allowing domestic drilling are the ones to blame)
The poor polar bears are dying off (the population has increased over the last 30 years and the Ice caps are GROWING per nasa and noaa)
3 from me, who can list more?

Posted by: Liberal lies | May 15, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

I’ll vote for Jesus, but never for Barack Hussein Obama..Just his middle name should evoke fear in us…

Posted by: johny smith | May 15, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Too many Americans have been deluded into believing that foreign leaders (especially the “Bullies”) are as spineless as ours. Do liberals honestly believe that the aggressive leaders of Russia, Iran, Syria and North Korea are interested in what the U.S. has to say? Why on earth should they listen and change? Did Chamberlain change Hitler’s mind? Did Zain Kahn listen to the Sikhs? Was the Qin emperor successful in his bid to save his people from the hands of Ghengis Kahn?
It is said that history repeats itself if one does not learn from it. Perhaps our liberal brethren would be best served by taking seriously the freedom they enjoy. One can only hope that liberals will one day actually feel a responsibility for the welfare of others, and not just themselves.

Posted by: BasisPro | May 15, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

i cannot imagine that a bright man like Obama would not involve other bright men and woman to his circle of leadership. Any american thinking that he’s an idiot or that he is soft of the defense of America is completely wrong. Obama is an intellectual tactician. He is a chess player, where Bush is a checkers player. Obama is a multifaceted individual with great periferal vision, enough to sit down with the tough guys of the world and discuss politics.
“keep you friends close, but keep your enemies closer.” — words from the great Michael Corleone.

Posted by: lavampire | May 15, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

rebelyell, is that you j.?

Posted by: Angelo | May 15, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

i cannot imagine that a bright man like Obama would not involve other bright men and woman to his circle of leadership. Any american thinking that he’s an idiot or that he is soft of the defense of America is completely wrong. Obama is an intellectual tactician. He is a chess player, where Bush is a checkers player. Obama is a multifaceted individual with great periferal vision, enough to sit down with the tough guys of the world and discuss politics.
“keep you friends close, but keep your enemies closer.” — words from the great Michael Corleone.

Posted by: lavampire | May 15, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Are you guys kidding me? You have little awareness of history and the fact that the “My way or the highway” approach to diplomacy doesn’t work.One must talk to anyone who wields power, and like it or not, the, so-called terrorists, have, in many regions been given power. You think they took the power by force? Look at Hamas…they won the Palestinian election FAIR AND SQUARE. When that victory did not suit our agenda for TOTAL DOMINATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST, the very next day they were declared a terrorist organization and put on the list. The reason why they have the power is because they have the infrastructure to make things happen. The people of these regions darn site trust these terrorists before they will trust the yankee imperialists. We must learn that no matter how powerful and big we are, we can still be felled by a thoushand little cuts. If you want this country to be strong (and lord knows I do!) and remain a power in the world, sometimes we have to eat a little humble pie. History has shown that huberous ALWAYS ends in downfall…And maybe if Mr. Bush wants to evoke the memories of Hitler in the Knesset (a rather calculated move), he might also like to remember that it was Hitler’s excessive pride that stretched his military power thin…thinking he was making the right decisions a la the eastern front…and Hitler was eventually brought to his knees. READ THE BOOKS PEOPLE…TRYANTS DON’T LAST LONG AND OUR LEADERS ARE BEHAVING LIKE TYRANTS!

Posted by: King of kings | May 15, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Yes Obama is a bit egotistical to think it is he that Bush is talking about, even if Bush was I don’t have confidence in Obama and how he thinks terrorists and despots should be dealt with. Pelosi is arrogant enough to be telling McCain how he should be thinking, perhaps she needs to stop taking herself so seriously. What does that broad doing holding a weekly press conference, how about doing legislative work, like you get paid for you silly cow. Though sadly she probably does her job about as much as the other congressmen.

Posted by: Mac | May 15, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Bush is cementing his legacy as the worst president ever. He is not one tenth the man his father is. Too bad he’s too stupid to realize it, and begin atoning for what he and his handlers have done to this country.

Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | May 15, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

If this country wants to win the war, we have to get a democrat in there. WWI–Wilson (D) win, WWII–Truman (D) win, Korean War–Eisenhower (R) Loss, Vietnam War–Nixon/Ford(R) Loss, Iraq War–Bush (R) losing so far (more money and time spent than in WWII).
It’s clear–if you want to lose a war, vote Republican. If you want to win, vot for a Democrat.

Posted by: RepublicanWimp | May 15, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Have we forgotten the images of Oklahoma bombing, Colombine High School and recently, Virginia. These acts were not done by Muslims, these were done by local American boys.
===
Actually, Virgina Tech was shot up by a Korean immigrant, not a “local boy”. He moved here as a child with his family.
(Not that we Virginians are blaming the Korean — or the general immigrant — community; just correcting the comment above)

Posted by: Virginian | May 15, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Steve said, “The Democratics are simply terrorist sympathizers. It’s about time Bush stood up to these haters of America. Now the RNC just needs to jump on board with a back bone.”
Steve. You’re an idiot. Go back to sleep.

Posted by: Clarence | May 15, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

“The 67% that disapprove of George Bush might not be so moved by his scorning of Barack Obama.”
But maybe the 82% who disapprove of the Democrat-led Congress would….

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Our soldiers take an oath to defend this country from all enemies foreign and domestic. It’s time to take out the domestic liberal enemies of america.

Posted by: defence | May 15, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

George Bush has recruited more terrorists than al- Queda. Lucky for us they all have been flocking to Iraq in huge numbers to die!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I guess the Democrats are upset that President Bush is referring to HAMAS, IRANIAN FASCISTS and HEZBOLLAH as “Terrorists and Radicals”. Same Democrats don’t seem upset when Liberals refer to other Americans as “Rednecks” when they don’t agree with their Leftist ideology.

Posted by: Paul | May 15, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

It’s hilarious how so many of these Bush-haters think the country is “ruined”. Please. Most of you have it so good that you don’t know which way is up. So, gas is $4.00 a gallon? It’s costed more than that in the European socialist countries you love so much–for years. Besides, doesn’t the left want high gas prices to discourage waste and reduce pollution? Geez, you guys cannot even get on the same page of what you’re going to gripe about. The economy is ruined? Please. Look up Jimmy Carter’s economy if you want to see the true definition of misery. You can take your Bush hatred all you want. The guy is not perfect, but he has done a decent job governing in far more difficult times than his predecessor, who ignored any problem that may have cost his popularity. We have enjoyed low unemployment, good job growth, low interest rates and low inflation for most of Bush’s term. Even now, times are not nearly as bad as wat the media has reported, which is why they have to parse words whenever an economic statistic comes out that shows things not being all that bad. In fact, the biggest problem with our country is the impact of all of you naysayers who sit around bitching about everything under the sun and how bad Bush is, while not adding value to anything. Here’s some advice: Forget about Bush or Obama and go out and make the world a better place on your own, without any help from Uncle Sam. How does that sound?

Posted by: smartypants | May 15, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

lavampire–I respectfully disagree with your labeling Bush as a checkers player.
Checkers requires too much strategic thought. Bush is more of a Rock Paper Scissors kind of guy.

Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | May 15, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

If this country wants to win the war, we have to get a democrat in there. WWI–Wilson (D) win, WWII–Truman (D) win, Korean War–Eisenhower (R) Loss, Vietnam War–Nixon/Ford(R) Loss, Iraq War–Bush (R) losing so far (more money and time spent than in WWII).
It’s clear–if you want to lose a war, vote Republican. If you want to win, vot for a Democrat.
I agree. Americans have been brainwashed into thinking the Repubiicans are tough. They just want to make profits on selling weapons—if they win the war then the profits will end. Democrats believe in winning wars because we’ve been wronged. If I can add–Vote Republican if you are for war profits, Vote Democrat if you want to win the war.

Posted by: TruBlu | May 15, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

If this country wants to win the war, we have to get a democrat in there. WWI–Wilson (D) win, WWII–Truman (D) win, Korean War–Eisenhower (R) Loss, Vietnam War–Nixon/Ford(R) Loss, Iraq War–Bush (R) losing so far (more money and time spent than in WWII).
It’s clear–if you want to lose a war, vote Republican. If you want to win, vot for a Democrat.
I agree. Americans have been brainwashed into thinking the Repubiicans are tough. They just want to make profits on selling weapons—if they win the war then the profits will end. Democrats believe in winning wars because we’ve been wronged. If I can add–Vote Republican if you are for war profits, Vote Democrat if you want to win the war.

Posted by: TruBlu | May 15, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

You all are so worried about the guy in a turban, you forget about the “home grown” terrorist in you’re own back yard. Remember the guy’s that bombed the federal Oklahoma City building not so long ago? I don’t think they wore turbans or came from Iraq or Iran. Some of you suffer from selected amnesia. The next act of terrorism will be from someone that is American, not Iraqi or Iranian. American’s have always terrorized each other. Stop looking overseas for what’s already here. You all sound like a bunch of scared little B’s if you ask me. Look in the mirror and ask yourself, “What did America do to bring this on itself?” Only a true idiot wouldn’t know the answer. You can watch that Jeremiah Wright video if you want a quick answer.

Posted by: Niles | May 15, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

A Barack Obama presidency will lead to destruction of America as we know it. Although that is probably fine with those of his supporters who are socialists and communists, many mindless people who have been duped by his inane speeches will live to regret supporting him in the unlikely event he prevails. The man is qualified to be a news anchor or a game show host, but not President of the United States. He is the classic empty suit.

Posted by: david | May 15, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

GO BUSH!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Bob | May 15, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

I absolutely love how the Libs all pin every one of their woes, and those of the world, on GWB. Easier to do so, I suppose, than to take responsibility and control of your own life…but then why do that when you can vote Dem and have your government make all your choices for you…pathetic group of soulless ingrates who are too blind to see the necessities that are being addressed by this administration (still mopping up the messes Slick Willy left behind, both figuratively and literally).
Perhaps all you Libs should have glass navels surgically installed so when your heads go any further up your azzes you can still see what’s going on in the world.

Posted by: SteveS | May 15, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

TruBlue, the Dems you are talking about winning wars were democrats BEFORE your party was stolen by the liberal whining left idiots that are running it now.

Posted by: billy bob | May 15, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

The Republican Neo-Cons love Torture, Torture, Torture. With four years of McCain will be the worst TORTURE! This country ever had!

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I sincerely hope Israel destroys Iranian military infrastructure and their nuclear facilities, for the sake of the world if not for the sake of Israel. Obama is a fool. Yes, the Iraq war was a mistake, but that doesn’t mean Israel should not prevent their inhalation or that the U.S. shouldn’t assist them. If Israel is destroyed, we are next my friends.

Posted by: Stephen | May 15, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I sincerely hope Israel destroys Iranian military infrastructure and their nuclear facilities, for the sake of the world if not for the sake of Israel. Obama is a fool. Yes, the Iraq war was a mistake, but that doesn’t mean Israel should not prevent their inhalation or that the U.S. shouldn’t assist them. If Israel is destroyed, we are next my friends.

Posted by: Stephen | May 15, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

And for all you Barack supporters out there I have one question…JUST ONE! What experience does Obama have that qualifies him to lead this country or any other? I await your lame replies…

Posted by: SteveS | May 15, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

You people are the most stupid people I have ever seen. All you do is bash Obama for things that don’t mount to a heel of beans. Get a life and look at what you are saying, it is nothing but the hate embedded in your hearts. I will be sure to inclide you in my prayers! God forgive you all!

Posted by: Emilianna | May 15, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Why do Mr. Obama and Ms. Pelosi have their respective shorts and/or panties all tied up in a knot? It appears to me that both Congresswoman Pelosi and Senator Obama “doth protest too much”! If the shoe fits, wear it!
When these two cockroaches are exposed to the light of truth, they scurry & run about quickly…protesting the exposure of their dark and dirty business. And, like the real roaches that they are, they do their business best by keeping us in the dark. They are afraid of being stepped-on by the foot of history & reasonable, well-informed people.
– Not a Democrat, Republican, or Lbertarian

Posted by: Richard | May 15, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

What’s with these stupid comments, America is bankrupt,, the only reason America will have problems is because of entitlements, like Social Security and Medicare, and if the country is so bankrupt as democrats like to say (so they can win more power) and make America a bad imitation of France( who are actually going bankrupt and poorer) was is it the solutions that democrats are coming up with is more entitlements and more spending programs. The media and the democrats have done a number on the America people , under Bush at 5.1% the employment rate has been better in his 7 1/2 years then under Clinton at 5.2% and Clinton only had a great economy because of the technical revolution which had nothing to do with him, that’s like saying that a President was responsible for the industrial revolution. And look at the things Bush inherited from Clinton, the 2000 dot.com bust, Bin Laden and 911, the 2001 market crash, by the time Bush came into office China, Russia were power houses economically because of all the trade deals and the WTO that Clinton put into effect in the 90′s, and Bush didn’t shrink his duties like Clinton he made the terrorists understand if they wanted to kill Americans, Americans would kill 10 of them for every American they killed and made sure it was fought every part of the world that they had found sanctuary, from Somalia, to Afghanistan, to Iraq and after 4 years of democrats convincing Americans that Bush is the problem and not the brutal killers of Iran and Al Qeada, Hammas, they are forcing him and ultimately Americans to fight with one hand behind their back, that’s why Iran is so confidante, not because of Iraq but because they know that democrats are wimps who will appease and appease until it’s to late for America to do anything, and democrats have found the best spokesman in Obama to accomplish this.

Posted by: lucy | May 15, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Please go to;
politico dot com website
ben smith
Liberal blogger
post annonymous comments
two most recent topics
Barry’s Drugs Use
Is attacking Michelle Fair?
Please visit and attack these two !!!

Posted by: Help Needed | May 15, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Barack Hussein Obama is a spinless, wimpy, wussy of a weenie. That’s why he will lose 40 states this November.

Posted by: Carlos | May 15, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Barack Hussein Obama is a spineless, wimpy, wussy of a weenie. That’s why he will lose 40 states this November.

Posted by: Carlos | May 15, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

billy bob,
When has a Republican ever won a war? Don’t even say Persian Gulf—Bush I was too scared to take out that S.O.B. when he got the chance. This Bush probably couldn’t beat Canada’s Mounties. He’s a cheerleader, not a player.

Posted by: Tr | May 15, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Matt:
“Kennedy Talked to the Soviets during the Cuban Missile crisis. The Soviets backed down.”
Just how old are you? I was a Marine in those days, and it wasn’t just talk. My southern California base was on the EAST coast looking at Cuba….

Posted by: Old Marine | May 15, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Since when does the American
Middle Class have to be caught
between the Neo-Con Israel
supporters on one side and the
Leftist Jews on the other?
I have no problem with the
the American Jewish community
supporting Israel as much as THEY
want to, but don’t make
me support Israel through my
taxes! This is a prima facie
violation of the separation of
Church and State.

Posted by: Art | May 15, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

“Obama attacks Bush for stating facts. He said he wanted to talk to Iran.”
–cookiecrumbles
Sec Defense Robert Gates said to the Washington Post that we should talk to Iran. The Iraq Study Group chaired by Former Sec State James Baker said we should talk to Iran and Syria.
Mary — Talking to Iran and Syria IS NOT appeasement. It’s this type of attitude that has lead us into the disaster we’re in today. The Neville Chamberlin example isn’t even applicable in this case. In Case you haven’t noticed, we currently have 160,000 troops in Iraq. 20,000 or so in Afghanistan. The US does not have the resources to invade Iran. We’ve tried fighting and all we’ve done is eliminate Iran’s two major regional enemies — Saddam and the Taliban. We’ve strengthened Iran through the actions of George W. Bush. Perhaps it’s time we sit down wiht Iran and Syria and come to some arrangement that will ensure stability in Iraq and the region.
Darryl, Tina Fresno –
So what if someone affiliated with Hamas likes Obama? What exactly does that tell you? He cannot control what other people say. Obama has made it abundently clear that he suppports Israel and in an Obama administration, the US will stand side-by-side with Israel. Both Obama and John McCain have the same voting record in the Senate when it comes to Hamas.
Finally, this idea that if Obama is elected ( or by extension any Democrat) that we’ll suddenly be inundated with terrorist attacks is absolutely ludicrous. This is the same fear mongering demagoguery that the republicans have been using for years. It’s the reason the country is in the mess that it’s in.

Posted by: Matt | May 15, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Barack Obama is a sore loser with identity crisis due to his background, and because of that he is co-dependent and affiliates with people such as Pastor Wright, Hugo Chavez, William Ayres, Ferracan, and a long etc. Those guys helped him to built his career in politics, where nothing is for free. He owns them . Sadly, the only way to verify if he wants to damage this country when he changes it (is there a thing about America that he likes the way it is ?), is to send him into the White House. Too risky in my opinion, now that we are in the middle of two wars.
On the other hand, there is Senator from New York Hillary Clinton, who had been directly affected by 9/11. It means, she knows: terrorists really want to destroy America, there are nothing good we can obtain by having a nice conversation with them.
While Obama and Hillary internal policies are quite similar, their foreign vision are so different that I will vote McCain if Obama is the candidate.

Posted by: floridianvoter | May 15, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

I never did like Bush or his administration but this time I can agree with him about Obama. Obama is dangerous to our economy and our relations with the world. The only good relationships he probably has are with the terrorists. If he is elected he will finish what the terrorists tried to do with 911. Anyone who votes for him deserves what they get.

Posted by: Joe Public | May 15, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

The South Vietnamese lost their fight with the communists when the DEMOCRAT Congress withdrew further military and financial aid that we had promised them.

Posted by: Todd | May 15, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Not one of those Marxist Democrats would condemn the racist, bigoted words of Commrade Rev Wright but they’ll slam our President for making A FACTUAL statement. Pres Bush knows history will repeat itself if leaders act stupid again. P.S.- My two year ols daughter has knocked down more than 37 pins without the bumpers Barry used-pathetic!

Posted by: killerbee | May 15, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Remember Jimmy Carter’s negotiations with IRAN, How wonderfully THEY worked?????? Yes, we have our next Jimmy Carter (OBAMA) to negotiate with IRAN again!!!!
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE FOLKS!!!!!!!

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

GET OUT OF IRAQ! NOW!

Posted by: Sisto Maxino | May 15, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

It is almost humourous to think that Bush is trying to spin Obama as some weak-spined liberal who would roll over for terrorists, and especially funny that he invoked Hitler’s name in that speech…let’s look at the track record:
No other president in history has molded our inalienable constitutional rights into something more like what Nazi Germany had during the Third Reich. He has attacked every one of the ten Bill of Rights and taken YOUR rights away.
Bush’s father, ex head of the CIA, was instrumental in forming the Muhajadeen, who became Al-Quaida…repeat…Bush Sr. helped form al-quaida!
Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush, ran an investment firm during WWII called “Brown Brothers Harriman” that were key FINANCIERS of NAZI GERMANY and HITLER! repeat…Prescott Bush invested and financed NAZI GERMANY! I wish more people would open their eyes and see how the rich and powerful control the media so we don’t even hear about this stuff. This is FACT. Not conspiracy theory…fact. Bush and his friends who run the banks of this world want to take complete control over you, your property, everyone you love, spy on you, analyze every move you make, and do it all for the name of protecting you from “terrorists”. BUSH, ROTHSCHILD, ROCKEFELLER families are the “TERRORISTS”! They are the ones with the most to gain out of this “war on terror”. WAKE UP! RESEARCH IT YOURSELF! READ! AWAKEN! IT’S NOT UP TO OTHER PEOPLE TO SOLVE THIS BIG, BIG PROBLEM…IT’S UP TO YOU AND US!

Posted by: oneintheknow | May 15, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

“If this country wants to win the war, we have to get a democrat in there. WWI–Wilson (D) win, WWII–Truman (D) win, Korean War–Eisenhower (R) Loss, Vietnam War–Nixon/Ford(R) Loss, Iraq War–Bush (R) losing so far (more money and time spent than in WWII).”
Not so fast. Korean War = tie, Iraq War = Win, with lots of cleanup to deal with. We defeated Saddam’s military forces decisively back in 2003. Wasn’t even close
“It’s clear–if you want to lose a war, vote Republican. If you want to win, vot for a Democrat.”
If Roosevelt, Chamberlin,and other world leaders had confronted Hitler before he invaded Poland, say 1937 or 1938, WWII might never have happened. Instead, they tried appeasement, and millions died for their lack of judgement.
“I agree. Americans have been brainwashed into thinking the Repubiicans are tough. They just want to make profits on selling weapons—if they win the war then the profits will end. Democrats believe in winning wars because we’ve been wronged. If I can add–Vote Republican if you are for war profits, Vote Democrat if you want to win the war.”
Now, this is where you’re just plain WRONG! If we thought Republicans were tough, they never would have lost their majority positions in Congress. Showing a jelly spine to Democrats is what led to Republican defeats, not showing strength. Repubs win when they show strength and backbone.

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

“If this country wants to win the war, we have to get a democrat in there. WWI–Wilson (D) win, WWII–Truman (D) win, Korean War–Eisenhower (R) Loss, Vietnam War–Nixon/Ford(R) Loss, Iraq War–Bush (R) losing so far (more money and time spent than in WWII).”
Not so fast. Korean War = tie, Iraq War = Win, with lots of cleanup to deal with. We defeated Saddam’s military forces decisively back in 2003. Wasn’t even close
“It’s clear–if you want to lose a war, vote Republican. If you want to win, vot for a Democrat.”
If Roosevelt, Chamberlin,and other world leaders had confronted Hitler before he invaded Poland, say 1937 or 1938, WWII might never have happened. Instead, they tried appeasement, and millions died for their lack of judgement.
“I agree. Americans have been brainwashed into thinking the Repubiicans are tough. They just want to make profits on selling weapons—if they win the war then the profits will end. Democrats believe in winning wars because we’ve been wronged. If I can add–Vote Republican if you are for war profits, Vote Democrat if you want to win the war.”
Now, this is where you’re just plain WRONG! If we thought Republicans were tough, they never would have lost their majority positions in Congress. Showing a jelly spine to Democrats is what led to Republican defeats, not showing strength. Repubs win when they show strength and backbone.

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Democrats must always first look to see the party that the person belongs to before they make a comment.
Democrats are 100% selfish politics.
The Iraqi war was the implementation of President Clinton’s war plan. Democrats applauded their hands raw then, in 1998. When it became used by Republicans, democrats were aghast and opposed.
Democrats are 100% PHONY.

Posted by: Firefly | May 15, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

BUSH STOP THE TORTURE! NOW!

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

George Bush was wrong to say this. Barack Obama was right to state what he did in reply. And, God Bless Nancy Pelosi! She stood up to tell Mr. Bush that he is acting the fool in front of a foreign nation. She has shown herself to be a real defender of the American people in the last year or so. I think she would make a fine vice president!

Posted by: Letitia | May 15, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Why would a man with the middle name ‘Hussein’ not want to first talk with Islamic extremists….. wake up America.

Posted by: TB | May 15, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

GET OUT OF IRAQ! NOW!
or?
I’ll tell my mommy?
I’ll fight you to the bitter end?
I bet the hypocrite would be willing to send in the army to take out Bush. But he whines when we use the army to take out a killer like Saddam.

Posted by: gerry | May 15, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Nobody cares what you think, Mr. Obama. Mr. Bush is the President and low as they are, his approval ratings are higher than these of the United States Congress.

Posted by: lihansen | May 15, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

One thing to remember, Obama Hussein, is a MARXIST and he and his friends and allies want to take this country down that path. Don’t ever forget that small detail. Why worry over who he’s going to talk to, it won’t make any difference

Posted by: Red | May 15, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

TR Bush1 won the gulf war and did exactly what he set out to. Bush2 is winning the Iraq war and will do so unless the wimpy Dems have their way and pull out.

Posted by: billy bob | May 15, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

TR Bush1 won the gulf war and did exactly what he set out to. Bush2 is winning the Iraq war and will do so unless the wimpy Dems have their way and pull out.

Posted by: billy bob | May 15, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

A bush would never deal with the enemy…..like say, Prescott Bush..
nooooo

Posted by: prescott | May 15, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

If Obama thinks what he got today from the Republicans is tough, just wait until the campaign officially starts. They will skewer him like a roasted pig. In case anyone is wondering why MSNBC is so tilted in its reporting towards Obama, this might just be the reason. It seems as if the Chairman/CEO OF GE, the parent company of NBC, makes millions and millions of dollars a year profit doing business with Iran. Gee you think that might be the reason they give such favorable coverage to Obama and roast Hillary and McCain whenever the opportunity arises. Maybe it is just a coincidience, NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Dominic Iacopino | May 15, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Come! Let’s Change the Wor(l)d Together!
The Truth about the Talmud
Let’s remove blasphemy against Jesus and Mary
and hatred for Gentiles* (Non-Jews) from the Talmud
*the rest of humanity
A Documented Exposé of Supremacist Rabbinic Hate Literature
By Warrant of John 18:37, Galatians 4:16
Copyright ©2000-2006 by Michael A. Hoffman II All Rights Reserved
Introduction
The Talmud is Judaism’s holiest book (actually a collection of books). Its authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of this may be found in the Talmud itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition): “My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament).”
The Talmud Nullifies the Bible
The Jewish Scribes claim the Talmud is partly a collection of traditions Moses gave them in oral form. These had not yet been written down in Jesus’ time. Christ condemned the traditions of the Mishnah (early Talmud) and those who taught it (Scribes and Pharisees), because the Talmud nullifies the teachings of the Holy Bible.
Insults Against Blessed Mary
Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus’ mother was a whore: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.” Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.
Gloats over Christ Dying Young
A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: “Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?–He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.”
Jesus in the Talmud:
Horrible Blasphemies Against Jesus Christ
While it is the standard disinformation practice of apologists for the Talmud to deny that it contains any scurrilous references to Jesus Christ, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations are more forthcoming and admit that the Talmud not only mentions Jesus but disparages him (as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak). These orthodox Jewish organizations make this admission perhaps out of the belief that Jewish supremacy is so well-established in the modern world that they need not concern themselves with adverse reactions.
For example, on the website of the Orthodox Jewish Hasidic Lubavitch group–one of the largest in the world–we find the following statement, complete with Talmudic citations:
“The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Jesus the Nazarene’:
1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).
2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).
3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh, which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).
End quote from http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm (Lubavitch website) June 20, 2000.
[Note: we have printed and preserved in our files a hard copy of this statement from the Lubavitch"Noah's Covenant Website," as it appeared on their website at http://www.noahide.com on June 20, 2000, in the event that denials are later issued and the statement itself suppressed].
Let us examine further some of these anti-Christ Talmud passages:
Gittin 57a. Says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”
Sanhedrin 43a. Says Jesus (“Yeshu” and in Soncino footnote #6, Yeshu “the Nazarene”) was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”
Kallah 51a.”The elders were once sitting in the gate when two young lads passed by; one covered his head and the other uncovered his head. Of him who uncovered his head Rabbi Eliezer remarked that he is a bastard. Rabbi Joshua remarked that he is the son of a niddah (a child conceived during a woman’s menstrual period). Rabbi Akiba said that he is both a bastard and a son of a niddah.
“They said, ‘What induced you to contradict the opinion of your colleagues?’ He replied, “I will prove it concerning him.” He went to the lad’s mother and found her sitting in the market selling beans.
“He said to her, ‘My daughter, if you will answer the question I will put to you, I will bring you to the world to come.’ (eternal life). She said to him, ‘Swear it to me.’
“Rabbi Akiba, taking the oath with his lips but annulling it in his heart, said to her, ‘What is the status of your son?’ She replied, ‘When I entered the bridal chamber I was niddah (menstruating) and my husband kept away from me; but my best man had intercourse with me and this son was born to me.’ Consequently the child was both a bastard and the son of a niddah.
“It was declared, ‘..Blessed be the God of Israel Who Revealed His Secret to Rabbi Akiba…”
In addition to the theme that God rewards clever liars, the preceding Talmud discussion is actually about Jesus Christ (the bastard boy who “uncovered his head” and was conceived in the filth of menstruation). The boy’s adulterous mother in this Talmud story is the mother of Christ, Blessed Mary (called Miriam and sometimes, Miriam the hairdresser, in the Talmud).
“The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah — replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all Gentiles but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus (after whose name the author adds piously, ‘May the name of the wicked perish’)… –Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21.
“The Talmud contains a few explicit references to Jesus…These references are certainly not complimentary…There seems little doubt that the account of the execution of Jesus on the eve of Passover does refer to the Christian Jesus…The passage in which Jesus’ punishment in hell is described also seems to refer to the Christian Jesus. It is a piece of anti-Christian polemic dating from the post-70 CE period…” –Hyam Maccoby, Judaism on Trial, pp. 26-27.
“According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned.
“The more popular accounts–which were nevertheless taken quite seriously–such as the notorious Toldot Yeshu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name ‘Jesus’ was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable and this popular tradition still persists…
“The Hebrew form of the name Jesus–Yeshu–was interpreted as an acronym for the curse, ‘may his name and memory be wiped out,’ which is used as an extreme form of abuse. In fact, anti-zionist Orthodox Jews (such as Neturey Qarta) sometimes refer to Herzl as ‘Herzl Jesus’ and I have found in religious zionist writings expressions such as “Nasser Jesus” and more recently ‘Arafat Jesus.” –Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 97- 98, 118.
Talmud Attacks Christians and Christian Books
Rosh Hashanah 17a. Christians (minnim) and others who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.
Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament (“uncanonical books”) will have no portion in the world to come.
Shabbath 116a. Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament.
Dr. Israel Shahak of Hebrew University reports that the Israelis burned hundreds of New Testament Bibles in occupied Palestine on March 23, 1980 (cf. Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21).
Some Teachings of the Jewish Talmud
Where a Jew Should Do Evil
Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.
Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis
Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.
O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile (“Cuthean”) the wages owed him for work.
Jews Have Superior Legal Status
Baba Kamma 37b. “If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”
Jews May Steal from Non-Jews
Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile (“heathen”) it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who “marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean…”
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile (“Cuthean”), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.
Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”
Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.
Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human
Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.
Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.
Sick and Insane Teachings of the Talmud
Gittin 69a . To heal his flesh a Jew should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix with honey and eat it.
Shabbath 41a. The law regulating the rule for how to urinate in a holy way is given.
Yebamoth 63a. States that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden.
Yebamoth 63a. Declares that agriculture is the lowest of occupations.
Sanhedrin 55b. A Jew may marry a three year old girl (specifically, three years “and a day” old).
Sanhedrin 54b. A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old.
Kethuboth 11b. “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.”
Yebamoth 59b. A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest.
Abodah Zarah 17a. States that there is not a whore in the world that the Talmudic sage Rabbi Eleazar has not had sex with. On one of his whorehouse romps, Rabbi Eleazar leanred that there was one particular prostitute residing in a whorehouse near the sea, who would receive a bag of money for her services. He took a bag of money and went to her, crossing seven rivers to do so. During their intercourse the prostitute farted. After this the whore told Rabbi Eleazar: “Just as this gas will never return to my anus, Rabbi Eleazar will never get to heaven.”
Hagigah 27a. States that no rabbi can ever go to hell.
Baba Mezia 59b. A rabbi debates God and defeats Him. God admits the rabbi won the debate.
Gittin 70a. The Rabbis taught: “On coming from a privy (outdoor toilet) a man should not have sexual intercourse till he has waited long enough to walk half a mile, because the demon of the privy is with him for that time; if he does, his children will be epileptic.”
Gittin 69b. To heal the disease of pleurisy (“catarrh”) a Jew should “take the excrement of a white dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog’s excrement as it loosens the limbs.”
Pesahim 111a. It is forbidden for dogs, women or palm trees to pass between two men, nor may others walk between dogs, women or palm trees. Special dangers are involved if the women are menstruating or sitting at a crossroads.
Menahoth 43b-44a. A Jewish man is obligated to say the following prayer every day: Thank you God for not making me a gentile, a woman or a slave.
Tall Tales of a Roman Holocaust
Here are two early “Holocaust” tales from the Talmud: Gittin 57b. Claims that four billion Jews were killed by the Romans in the city of Bethar. Gittin 58a claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans. (Ancient demography indicates that there were not 16 million Jews in the entire world at that time, much less 16 million Jewish children or four billion Jews).
A Revealing Admission
Abodah Zarah 70a. The question was asked of the rabbi whether wine stolen in Pumbeditha might be used or if it was defiled, due to the fact that the thieves might have been gentiles (a gentile touching wine would make the wine unclean). The rabbi says not to worry, that the wine is permissible for Jewish use because the majority of the thieves in Pumbeditha, the place where the wine was stolen, are Jews. (Also cf. Gemara Rosh Hashanah 25b).
Pharisaic Rituals
Erubin 21b. “Rabbi Akiba said to him, “Give me some water to wash my hands.”
“It will not suffice for drinking,” the other complained, “will it suffice for washing your hands?”
“What can I do?’ the former replied, “when for neglecting the words of the Rabbis one deserves death? It is better that I myself should die than that I transgress against the opinion of my colleagues.” [This is the ritual hand washing condemned by Jesus in Matthew 15: 1-9].
Genocide Advocated by the Talmud
Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).
This passage is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, “Gentile,” (p. 617).
This original Talmud passage has been concealed in translation. The Jewish Encyclopedia states that, “…in the various versions the reading has been altered, ‘The best among the Egyptians’ being generally substituted.” In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Minor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b].
Israelis annually take part in a national pilgrimage to the grave of Simon ben Yohai, to honor this rabbi who advocated the extermination of non-Jews. (Jewish Press, June 9, 1989, p. 56B).
On Purim, Feb. 25, 1994, Israeli army officer Baruch Goldstein, an orthodox Jew from Brooklyn, massacred 40 Palestinian civilians, including children, while they knelt in prayer in a mosque. Goldstein was a disciple of the late Brooklyn Rabbi Meir Kahane, who told CBS News that his teaching that Arabs are “dogs” is derived “from the Talmud.” (CBS 60 Minutes, “Kahane”).
University of Jerusalem Prof. Ehud Sprinzak described Kahane and Goldstein’s philosophy: “They believe it’s God’s will that they commit violence against goyim, a Hebrew term for non-Jews.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 26, 1994, p. 5).
Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg declared, “We have to recognize that Jewish blood and the blood of a goy are not the same thing.” (NY Times, June 6, 1989, p.5).
Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6).
Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are not Human
The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals, and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam. Here are some of the Talmud passages which relate to this topic.
Kerithoth 6b: Uses of Oil of Anointing. “Our Rabbis have taught: He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is not guilty; if over gentiles (goyim) or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: “Upon the flesh of man (Adam), shall it not be poured (Exodus 30:32]); and cattle and vessels are not man (Adam).
“Also with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called corpse and not a man (Adam). But why is one exempt in the case of gentiles (goyim); are they not in the category of man (Adam)? No, it is written: ‘And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are man” (Adam); [Ezekiel 34:31]: Ye are called man (Adam) but gentiles (goyim) are not called man (Adam).”
In the preceding passage, the rabbis are discussing the portion of the Mosaic law which forbids applying the holy oil to men.
The Talmud states that it is not a sin to apply the holy oil to Gentiles, because Gentiles are not human beings (i.e. are not of Adam).
Another example from tractate Yebamoth 61a: “It was taught: And so did R. Simeon ben Yohai state (61a) that the graves of gentiles (goyim) do not impart levitical uncleanness by an ohel [standing or bending over a grave], for it is said, ‘And ye my sheep the sheep of my pasture, are men (Adam), [Ezekiel 34:31]; you are called men (Adam) but the idolaters are not called men (Adam).”
The Old Testament Mosaic law states that touching a human corpse or the grave of a human imparts uncleanness to those who touch it. But the Talmud teaches that if a Jew touches the grave of a Gentile, the Jew is not rendered unclean, since Gentiles are not human (not of Adam).
From Baba Mezia 114b: “”A Jewish priest was standing in a graveyard. When asked why he was standing there in apparent violation of the Mosaic law, he replied that it was permissible, since the law only prohibits Jews from coming into contact with the graves of humans (Adamites), and he was standing in a gentile graveyard. For it has been taught by Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: ‘The graves of gentiles [goyim] do not defile. For it is written, ‘And ye my flock, the flock of my pastures, are men (Adam)’ (Ezekiel 34:31); only ye are designated men (Adam).”
Ezekiel 34:31 is the alleged Biblical proof text repeatedly cited in the preceding three Talmud passages. But Ezekiel 34:31 does not in fact support the Talmudic notion that only Israelites are human. What these rabbinical, anti-Gentile racists and ideologues have done in asserting the preceding absurdities about Gentiles is distort an Old Testament passage in order to justify their bigotry.
In Berakoth 58a the Talmud uses Ezekiel 23:20 as proof of the sub-human status of gentiles. It also teaches that anyone (even a Jewish man) who reveals this Talmudic teaching about non-Jews deserves death, since revealing it makes Gentiles wrathful and causes the repression of Judaism.
The Talmudic citation of this scripture from Ezekiel as a “proof-text” is specious, since the passage does not prove that Gentiles are animals. The passage from Ezekiel only says that some Egyptians had large genital organs and copious emissions. This does not in any way prove or even connote that the Egyptians being referred to in the Bible were considered animals. Once again, the Talmud has falsified the Bible by means of distorted interpretation.
Other Talmud passages which expound on Ezekiel 23:20 in this racist fashion are: Arakin 19b, Berakoth 25b, Niddah 45a, Shabbath 150a, Yebamoth 98a. Moreover, the original text of Sanhedrin 37a applies God’s approval only to the saving of Jewish lives (cf. the Hesronot Ha-shas, Cracow, 1894).
Moses Maimonides: Advocate of Extermination
We will now examine the post-Talmudic commentator Rambam (Moses Maimonides). This revered “sage” taught that Christians should be exterminated. He has the highest stature in Judaism:
“Moses Maimonides is considered the greatest codifier and philosopher in Jewish history. He is often affectionately referred to as the Rambam, after the initials of his name and title, Rabenu Moshe Ben Maimon, “Our Rabbi, Moses son of Maimon.” [Maimonides' Principles, edited by Aryeh Kaplan, Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America,, p. 3].
Here is what Maimonides (Rambam) taught concerning saving people’s lives, especially concerning saving the lives of gentiles and Christians, or even Jews who dared to deny the “divine inspiration” of the Talmud:
Maimonides, Mishnah Torah, (Moznaim Publishing Corporation, Brooklyn, New York, 1990, Chapter 10, English Translation), p. 184: “Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him. If we see that his life is in danger, we should not save him.” The Hebrew text of the Feldheim 1981 edition of Mishnah Torah states this as well.
Immediately after Maimonides’ admonition that it is a duty for Jews not to save a drowning or perishing gentile, he informs us of the Talmudic duty of Jews towards Christians, and also towards Jews who deny the Talmud. Maimonides, Mishnah Torah, (Chapter 10), p. 184:
“It is a mitzvah [religious duty], however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minnim, and apikorsim, and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot.”
The Jewish publisher’s commentary accompanying the preceding statement of Maimonides states that Jesus was an example of a min (plural: minnim).
The commentary also states that the students of Tzadok were defined as those Jews who deny the truth of the Talmud and who uphold only the written law (i.e. the Old Testament).
According to Maimonides’ Principles, p. 5, Maimonides “spent twelve years extracting every decision and law from the Talmud, and arranging them all into 14 systematic volumes. The work was finally completed in 1180, and was called Mishnah Torah, or “Code of the Torah.”
Maimonides taught in another part of the Mishnah Torah that gentiles are not human: “Man alone, and not vessels, can contract uncleanness by carriage. …The corpse of a gentile, however, does not convey uncleanness by overshadowing. …a gentile does not contract corpse uncleanness; and if a gentile touches, carries, or overshadows a corpse he is as one who did not touch it.
“To what is this like? It is like a beast which touches a corpse or overshadows it. And this applies not to corpse uncleanness only but to any other kind of uncleanness: neither gentiles nor cattle are susceptible to any uncleanness.” (The Code of Maimonides, vol. 10, translated by Herbert Danby, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1954, pp. 8-9).
Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Rotze’ach 2:11: “A Jew who killed a righteous gentile is not executed in a court of law. It says in Exodus 21:14, ‘If a man schemes against his fellow man and kills the man deliberately, take him away from the altar and put him to death.’ But a gentile is not considered a man, and even more so, a Jew is not executed for killing an unrighteous gentile.”
The Schindler’s List Quote
The Talmud (i.e., the Babylonian Talmud) text of Sanhedrin 37a restricts the duty to save life to saving only Jewish lives.
The book on Hebrew censorship, written by Jews themselves (Hesronot Ha-shas), notes that some Talmud texts use the universalist phrase:
“Whoever destroys the life of a single human being…it is as if he had destroyed an entire world; and whoever preserves the life of a single human being …it is as if he had preserved an entire world.”
However, Hesronot Ha-shas points out that these are not the authentic words of the original Talmud.
In other words, the preceding universalist rendering is not the authentic text of the Talmud and thus, for example, this universalist version which Steven Spielberg in his famous movie, Schindler’s List attributed to the Talmud (and which became the motto of the movie on posters and in advertisements), is a hoax and constitutes propaganda intended to give a humanistic gloss to a Talmud which is, in its essence, racist and chauvinist hate literature.
In the authentic, original Talmud text it states that “whoever preserves a single soul of Israel, it is as if he had preserved an entire world” (emphasis supplied). The authentic Talmud text sanctions only the saving of Jewish lives.
Jewish Deception and Dissimulation
The response of the orthodox rabbis to documentation regarding the racism and hatred in their sacred texts is simply to brazenly lie, in keeping with the Talmud’s Baba Kamma 113a which states that Jews may use lies (“subterfuge”) to circumvent a Gentile.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center, a multi-million dollar rabbinical propaganda center dispatched Rabbi Daniel Landes in 1995 to deny that the Talmud dehumanizes non-Jews. “This is utter rot,” he said. His proof? Why, his word, of course.
Lying to “circumvent a Gentile” has a long patrimony in Judaism. Take for example the 13th century Talmud debate in Paris between Nicholas of Donin, a Jewish convert to Christianity, whom Hyam Maccoby admits had “a good knowledge of the Talmud” ( “The Jews on Trial,” p. 26) and Rabbi Yehiel. Yehiel was not under threat of death, bodily injury, imprisonment or fine. Yet he brazenly lied during the course of the debate.
When asked by Donin whether there were attacks on Jesus in the Talmud, Yehiel denied that there were any. Donin, a Hebrew and Aramaic scholar, knew this to be false. Hyam Maccoby, a 20th century Jewish commentator on the debate, defends Rabbi Yehiel’s lying in this way:
“The question may be asked, however, whether Yehiel really believed that Jesus was not mentioned in the Talmud, or whether he put this forward as an ingenious ploy in the desperate situation in which he found himself…It would certainly have been pardonable of the rabbi to attempt some condonation in which he did not fully believe, to prevent such tyrannical proceedings by one religious culture against another.” ( Maccoby, “The Jews on Trial,” p. 28).
This is how Jewish denial of the existence of hateful Talmud texts is justified to this day. A fanciful word for Jewish lying is conjured (“condonation”) and deemed “pardonable,” while any scrutiny of Jewish holy books by Christian investigators is characterized as a “tyrannical proceeding.”
In 1994, Rabbi Tzvi Marx, director of Applied Education at the Shalom Hartman Institute in Jerusalem, made a remarkable admission concerning how Jewish rabbis in the past have issued two sets of texts: the authentic Talmudic texts with which they instruct their own youth in the Talmud schools (yeshiviot) and “censured and amended” versions which they disseminate to gullible non-Jews for public consumption.
Rabbi Marx states that in the version of Maimonides’ teachings published for public consumption, Maimonides is made to say that whoever kills a human being transgresses the law.
But, Rabbi Marx points out “…this only reflects the censured and amended printed text, whereas the original manuscripts have it only as ‘whoever kills an Israelite.”(Tikkun: A Bi-Monthly Jewish Critique May-June, 1994).
The Jewish book, Hesronot Ha-shas (“that which is removed from the Talmud”), is important in this regard. (Cf. William Popper, The Censorship of Hebrew Books p. 59).
Hesronot Ha-shas was reprinted in 1989 by Sinai Publishing of Tel-Aviv. Hesronot Ha-shas is valuable because it lists both the original Talmud texts that were later changed or omitted, and the falsified texts cited for Gentile consumption as authentic.
Historian William Popper states: “It was not always that long passages…were censored…but often single words alone were omitted…Often, in these cases, another method of correction was used in place of omission–substitution.” (Cf. William Popper, The Censorship of Hebrew Books pp. 58-59).
For example, the translators of the English Soncino version of the Talmud sometimes render the Hebrew word goyim (Gentiles) under any number of disguise words such as “heathen, Cuthean, Kushite, Egyptian, idolater” etc. But these are actually references to Gentiles (all non-Jews). Footnotes for certain passages in the Soncino Talmud translation state: “Cuthean (Samaritan) was here substituted for the original goy…”
The heirs of the Pharisees often deny the existence of the Talmud passages here cited, in order to brazenly claim that such passages are the “fabrications of anti-Semites.”
In 1994, the 80 year old Lady Jane Birdwood was arrested and prosecuted in a criminal court in London, England for the “crime” of publishing in her pamphlet, The Longest Hatred, the truthful statement that the Talmud contains anti-Gentile and anti-Christian passages. (She was accused of violating the Public Order Act of 1986).
In the course of her Orwellian thought-crime trial, which was ignored by the U.S. media, a rabbi was called as a prosecution witness. The rabbi proceeded to flatly deny that the Talmud contained anti-Gentile or anti-Christian passages and on the basis of the rabbi’s “prestige,” this elderly and ailing woman was sentenced to three months in jail and fined the equivalent of $1,000.
“Judeo-Christian” Response to the Talmud
Neither the modern popes or the modern heads of Protestantism, have ever insisted that the rabbis of Judaism repudiate or condemn the racism in the Talmud or the murderous hate for Christians and gentiles expressed within it. On the contrary, the heads of Churchianity have urged the followers of Christ to obey, honor and support the followers of the Talmud. Therefore, it should be obvious that these Catholic and Protestant leaders are the worst betrayers of Jesus Christ on earth today. (Cf. Matthew 23:13-15; I Thess. 2:14-16; Titus 1:14; Luke 3:8-9; Rev. 3:9).
Non-Jews are “Supernal Refuse”
Moreover, not only Christians but non-Christians of all races are regarded as “supernal refuse” (garbage) by Talmud teachers such as the founder of Habad-Lubavitch, Rabbi Shneur Zalman.
This was analyzed in the Jewish magazine, New Republic: “…there are some powerful ironies in Habad’s new messianic universalism, in its mission to the gentiles; and surely the most unpleasant of them concerns Habad’s otherwise undisguised and even racial contempt for the goyim.
“…medieval Jewish theologians–most notably the poet and philosopher Judah Ha-Levi in twelfth-century Spain and the mystic Judah Loewe in sixteenth-century Prague–sought to define the Jewish distinction racially rather than spiritually…this…view, according to which there is something innately superior about the Jews, was rehabilitated in its most extreme form by Shneur Zalman of Lyady. The founder of Lubavitcher Hasidism taught that there is a difference of essence between the souls of Jews and the souls of gentiles, that only in the Jewish soul does there reside a spark of divine vitality.
“As for the goyim…Zalman’s attitude (was): ‘Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.’
“Consequently, references to gentiles in Rabbi Shneur Zalman’s teachings are invariably invidious. Their (non-Jews) material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews, as the pieces of chaff outnumber the kernels…All Jews were innately good, all gentiles innately evil.
“…Moreover, this characterization of gentiles as being inherently evil, as being spiritually as well as biologically inferior to Jews, has not in any way been revised in later Habad writing.” –The New Republic, May 4, 1992. Also cf. Roman A. Foxbrunner, Habad: The Hasidism of Shneur Zalman of Lyady (Northvale, New Jersey, Jason Aronson, Inc., 1993) pp. 108-109.
U.S. Government Lays Groundwork for Talmudic Courts
“Our” government under Presidents Reagan, Bush and Clinton, has provided, under the euphemism of education (for example, House Joint Resolution 173 and Public Law 102-14), a groundwork for the establishment of Talmudic “courts of justice” to be administered by disciples of Shneur Zalman’s Chabad successor, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson.
Maimonides ruled that it is a Jewish court — or a court appointed by Jewish authority –that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. Maimonides further decreed that any non-Jewish nation “not subject to our jurisdiction” (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Jewish holy war. (Cf. Hilkhot Melakhim 8:9-10; 10:11. Also cf. Gerald J. Blidstein, “Holy War in Maimonidean Law,” in Perspectives on Maimonides [Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press, 1991].
These courts are to be convened allegedly under the “Noahide Laws” (proscriptions against idolatry supposedly based on the covenant with Noah). The U.S. presidents and Congress urged the adoption of the “Noahide” Laws as interpreted by Chabad-Lubavitch Grand Rabbi Schneerson.
Prof. Easterly of the Southern University Law Center, a Jewish legal expert, has compared this Public law 102-14 to the “first rays of dawn” which “evidence the rising of a still unseen sun.”
The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a possible world order immediately preceding the universal reign of the Talmud.
It has to be understood that we are not dealing with the Noah of the Bible when the religion of Judaism refers to “Noahide law,” but the Noahide law as understood and interpreted by the absolute system of falsification that constitutes the Talmud.
Under the Talmud’s counterfeit Noahide Laws, the worship of Jesus is forbidden under penalty of death, since such worship of Christ is condemned by Judaism as idolatry. Meanwhile various forms of incest are permitted under the Talmudic understanding of the Noahide code. (Enziklopediya Talmudit, note 1, pp. 351-352).
Furthermore, all non-Jews would have the legal status of ger toshav (“resident alien,” cf. Alan Unterman, Dictionary of Jewish Lore and Legend [London: Thames and Hudson, 1991], p. 148), even in their own land; as for example in occupied Palestine where newly arrived Khazars from Russia have an automatic right to housing and citizenship, while two million Palestinian refugees who either fled or were expelled by the Israelis, are forbidden the right of return.
Resident alien status has been clearly delineated in scholarly articles in leading Jewish publications. For example, Hebrew University Professor Mordechai Nisan, basing his exposition on Maimonides, stated that a non-Jew permitted to reside in a land ruled by Jewish law “must accept paying a tax and suffering the humiliation of servitude.”
If Gentiles refuse to live a life of inferiority, then this signals their rebellion and the unavoidable necessity of Jewish warfare against their very presence. [Cf. Mordechai Nisan, Kivunim (official publication of the World Zionist Organization), August, 1984, pp. 151-156].
At a symposium (“Is Autonomy for Resident Aliens Feasible?”) organized by Israeli Minister of Education Shulamit Aloni, the Israeli Chief Rabbi Shlomo Goren repeated the Talmudic teaching on resident aliens: that Judaism forbids “granting any national rights” to them. He ruled that such “Autonomy is tantamount to a denial of the Jewish religion.” (Nadav Shraggai, Ha’aretz, Oct. 14, 1992).
American taxpayers’ subsidy of the so-called “U.S. Holocaust Museum” in Washington, D.C., is yet another indicator of the gradual establishment of a Jewish state religion in the U.S. This “Holocaust museum” excludes any reference to holocausts perpetrated by Jewish Communists against Christians in Russia and Eastern Europe, from 1917 onward.
The focus of the museum is almost entirely on Jewish suffering. Holocausts perpetrated by Israelis against Arabs in Lebanon and Palestine since 1948 are nowhere to be found in the exhibits of the U.S. “Holocaust Museum,” which functions more like a synagogue than a repository of objective historical information.
It is through the rapid emergence of this ostensibly secular but all-pervasive “Holocaustianity” — whereby the religion of Judaism is gaining enormous power and influence as mankind’s supreme ethos and the creed of God’s Holy People.
Jewish Law Requires Christians be Executed
Israeli “Torah scholars” have ruled that:
“The Torah maintains that the righteous of all nations have a place in the World to Come. But not all religious Gentiles earn eternal life by virtue of observing their religion…And while the Christians do generally accept the Hebrew Bible as truly from God, many of them (those who accept the so-called divinity of Jesus) are idolaters according to the Torah, punishable by death, and certainly will not enjoy the World to Come.”
–Israeli Mechon-Mamre website, June 26, 2000; 12 Hayyim Vital St., Jerusalem, Occupied Palestine. (“Mechon Mamre is a small group of Torah scholars in Israel…”).
[Note: we have printed and preserved in our files a hard copy of this statement from the Israeli "Mechon-Mamre Torah Scholars," as it appeared on their website at http://www.mechon-mamre.org/jewfaq/gentiles.htm on June 26, 2000, in the event that denials are later issued and the statement itself suppressed].
Jewish Superstitions
It is not for nothing that the authoritative edition of the Talmud is known as the Babylonian Talmud. As Christians misled by their Judaizing preachers and popes are increasingly consulting Jewish rabbinical sources for a “pure” understanding of the Old Testament, they are unknowingly consulting the occult.
Judaism is the religion of the Pharisees and the patrimony of Babylon, from whence the Talmudic and Kabbalistic traditions of Judaism ultimately derive. Orthodox Judaism’s other sacred book, the Kabbalah, is filled with astrological teachings, fortune-telling, gematria, necromancy and demonology.
The photograph on the cover of this publication’s hard copy version shows an orthodox Jew performing a ritual to transfer his sins to the chicken he is waving over his head. This is pernicious superstition.
Furthermore, the Israeli “Star of David,” is actually nothing of the kind, but rather an occult hexagram, a yantra of the androgyne, which became associated with the Khazars in 14th century Bohemia. (The misnamed “state of Israel” was founded in 1948 in an alliance between Jewish Communists and atheistic Zionists, with crucial U.N. recognition provided by Soviet Communist dictator Joseph Stalin).
Christians might find it eye-opening to visit a Hasidic Jewish area during “Purim” and observe the grotesque, Halloween-like cavorting. Though the Purim festival uses the Book of Esther as its supposed proof-text, in practice the Jewish celebration of Purim is little more than a Bacchanal (cf. “Superstitions said legacy from Jewish ancestors,” Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 16, 1989, p. 58).
Orthodox rabbis place curses, cast spells and imagine they have powers greater than God, derived from their study of the Sefer Yezriah, (a book of Kabbalistic magic). Christians are trafficking in Babylonian paganism when they defer to the rabbis of Judaism.
Sodomy in the synagogue
From a report published in the Hebrew language Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz
“…for many years, (Talmud scribe) Yaakov Yitzhak Brizel…sodomized ultra-Orthodox boys. The greatest rabbis knew – and did nothing…
“At the age of 11, Moisheleh, the strongest fellow in the talmud torah (school for ultra-Orthodox boys), went up to Shaiya Brizel and said to him: ‘Kid, I want you know that your father is not the holy man you think he is. He is a homo.’ …Brizel was a scion of the Brizel family, which founded …the mysterious organization that imposes moral order on the ultra-Orthodox ghetto…
“Had the father, Yaakov Yitzhak Brizel …contented himself with homosexual relations with adults, it is reasonable to suppose that we would never have heard his son’s story.
“However, in his book, The Silence of the Ultra-Orthodox, published a few weeks ago, the son claims that for decades his father …sodomized yeshiva students. He committed the act in empty synagogues during the hours between prayers and in other places.
“The greatest of the ultra-Orthodox rabbis…like Rabbi Landau and the halachic sage Shmuel Halevi Hausner of Bnei Brak, knew and kept silent. The father was a Hasid heart and soul, and went to a number of rebbes…. the twin brother of the rebbe from Rehovot, the Rebbe of Kretschnif in Kiryat Gat, was happy to accept the father among his followers. Ultimately, claims Brizel, it was not easy for the Rebbe from Kiryat Gat to be picky when he could win such a respected adherent.
“…The proud father with the look of an honored rebbe, who observed all the commandments from the slightest to the most important, used to pray at a certain yeshiva with the young boys. There, claims Shaiya Brizel, he hunted his victims. When the head of the yeshiva discovered the true reason that the respected Torah scribe was praying fervently at his yeshiva, he did not contact the police…
“Before the publication of his book, Shaiya Brizel met with the yeshiva head. ‘You are right that we covered up for him,’ admitted the man. ‘I and a few other rabbis…I was busy trying to calm things down and hushing up the affair so that it would not get publicized.’
“(The son) published the book using real names. His entire family and almost all the rabbis appear under their own names. Only the names of some of the localities and the head of the yeshiva are disguised. To protect himself from a legal point of view, Brizel held a series of conversations with members of his family and rabbis, in which he demanded explanations of why they had covered up for his father’s misbehavior. He secretly recorded all these conversations, even with his mother.
“If I had written without the names it would have been fiction and this certainly did not suit me,” he explained. ‘I wanted things to change, for ultra-Orthodox society to know that it can attempt to hide things and be hidden, but even if it takes 30 years, a Golem will always rise up against its creator and reveal everything. In this case, I was the Golem.’
“When Rachel Brizel, the daughter of a good Bnei Brak family, married an arranged match from the glorious Brizel family, she had no idea that she was destroying her own life. After six months, she caught her husband having sex with another man. In that case, at least it was with an adult.
“Shaiya Brizel relates that some of the boys with whom his father had relations sent letters of complaint to their own fathers; in the discreet ultra-Orthodox society they had no one else to whom they could complain.
Shaiya Brizel: author of a book telling of sodomy in the synagogue
“When she read these letters, my mother went out of her mind,’ writes Brizel. ‘Every such letter made her want to demand a divorce. Again and again batteries of mediators, the Brizel rabbis, would show up, whose job it was to calm her down so that, heaven forbid, she would not destroy the good name of the Brizel family.
“They could live with the fact that one of their own had raped minors, but for them divorce was an impossible situation.’
“…Twice, once during prayers in a synagogue, and once during a Gemara (Talmud) study hour at Rabbi Eliezer Shach’s Ponevezh Yeshiva, ultra-Orthodox men who were strangers to him touched his sexual organ, presumably on the assumption that he followed in his father’s footsteps. The first time, he made a fuss, only to discover that the only thing that interested the people there was to hush the whole thing up. The second time, he made do with a whispered warning to the man.
“Shaiya Brizel is now 36 and the father of three; he works as an accountant.
“His father, 65, was forced to leave home several years ago and return to his elderly parents’ apartment. Shaiya wrote this book after a suicide attempt in June.
‘For all those years I was half dead. For the past five years I have been getting psychological treatment. During my talks with the psychologist I decided that I was going to spew out all this ugliness in the form of a book.’
“He took into account that there would be violent reactions to the book…which only came out a few weeks ago…Brizel suffers from a serious heart defect, which could cause his death. As a way of protecting himself, he has deposited a letter with three lawyers that contains serious allegations about the Eda Haredit, and he has informed the relevant people.
“Recently, he has moved to a new apartment, and he lives in the National Religious sector of a mixed community of National Religious and ultra-Orthodox families. Naturally, he started praying at the only Hasidic synagogue in the settlement. After the book came out, associates of the local rebbe (rabbi) informed him that he was persona non grata.
“Ironically, this same rebbe had come to the area after being compelled to leave several other communities on suspicion of having sodomized his pupils. In ultra-Orthodox society, revealing that acts of sodomy have been committed is a far graver offense than committing them.
“On the day the book was published, Brizel met with the head of the Hachemei Lublin Yeshiva, Rabbi Avraham Vazner. ‘He told me that publishing the book was a million times worse than what my father had done…’
“Ha’aretz has been unable to obtain a response from Rabbi Yaakov Yitzhak Brizel. At his parents’ home, a woman replied: “We don’t care. Shaiya is a liar and there is nothing more to be said.”
“Ha’aretz also requested the Brizels’ response through the Eda Haredit activist Yehuda Meshi- Zahav. By the time the article went to press, there was no response through this channel either.
“Several weeks ago the father responded to the women’s magazine La’isha, saying that he would sue the publishers, which has not yet happened. It is unlikely that it will happen.
“Shaiya Brizel was ready to put off publication of the book, on condition that the family sue him in a rabbinical court, in which the affair would be aired. He has said that no one in the family was prepared to take up the challenge.
“In the conversation with La’isha, the father said that he was indeed a homosexual, ‘But I have had treatment and today I am no longer like that. All this is behind me.’
“In reply to a question as to whether he had sexual relations with minors, he replied: ‘Perhaps I will talk about that some other time.’ He accused his son Shaiya of being ‘the only one who is after me. He has destroyed my life…He wrote this only for the money. He wanted money from me…Because of him I separated from my wife.’
“Shaiya’s sister, Rivka Hubert, spoke with great anger to the La’isha reporter about the fact that her brother had revealed the names of the persons involved, and declared: ‘We deny everything it says in the book.”
[End quote]
Source: Ha’aretz, “Israel’s Leading Daily Newspaper,” Shevat 25, 5760 (Feb. 1, 2000).
Christianity is the only true religion of the Bible. It was founded by Israelites who adhered to the Torah (Pentateuch) and who recognized in Christ’s gospel of salvation through grace, the fulfillment of the Old Testament. It is the followers of Jesus who constitute the holy nation and the royal priesthood (I Peter 2:9).
Copyright ©2000-2006 by Michael A. Hoffman II All Rights Reserved.
The Truth About the Talmud is copyrighted material excerpted from Michael A. Hoffman’s book, “Judaism’s Strange Gods.”
Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816
Hoffman Counters ADL’s Talmud Apologia:
Jesus and the Talmud: A Rejoinder
RevisionistHistory.org
archives / news / bookstore

Posted by: qazi63 | May 15, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Obama,
When someone (in this case the terrorists) are punching you in the face; you are engaged with them whether you like it or not, so ignoring them will not make them go away. Bush just happens to have a backbone, and does not seem to base his decisions on popular opinion.

Posted by: JPeters | May 15, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

None of the candidates are going to fulfill their promises. We discuss the Presendential candidates but keep forgetting the congress controls the money. We won’t see any real changes until term limits for the house and senate are enacted. Twelve years total in either house. Now once they are elected they are only interested in the next election. That and the Fair Tax would go a long way to taking back control of this country.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

None of the candidates are going to fulfill their promises. We discuss the Presendential candidates but keep forgetting the congress controls the money. We won’t see any real changes until term limits for the house and senate are enacted. Twelve years total in either house. Now once they are elected they are only interested in the next election. That and the Fair Tax would go a long way to taking back control of this country.

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

To: Repubican Wimp (l left out on purpose)
Let’s look at this a different way-
Recent History – Presidents responsible for getting us into conflicts:
WWI–Wilson (D)
WWII–Roosevelt (D)
Korean War–Truman (D)
Vietnam War–Kennedy (D)
Iraq War I–Bush (R) a win by the way
Iraq War II–Bush (R) winning according to those care enough to be independent minded
Afghanastan War –Bush (R) also winning
It’s clear–if you want to get into a worldwide war, vote Democratic!

Posted by: BasisPro | May 15, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Get with the program people.This is a genuis tact used by The President and Karl Rove to bring out those who feel like they have to defend themselves.
The President mentioned no names,but look at the response,the 100% liberal Democratic reponse.
Why say anything,what are they defending?…because when it comes down to it,the Democrats are weak on national security…PERIOD!!!
So now they knock each over trying to get to a microphone to defend their position.And its documented with words,or better yet,how about there actions.
Anyone remember the leaders of the Democrats,such as the Speakers,Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Syria,how about Democrat Jimmy Carter meeting with hamas?
THE REAL….INCOVENIENT TRUTH

Posted by: Dennis | May 15, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Get with the program people.This is a genuis tact used by The President and Karl Rove to bring out those who feel like they have to defend themselves.
The President mentioned no names,but look at the response,the 100% liberal Democratic reponse.
Why say anything,what are they defending?…because when it comes down to it,the Democrats are weak on national security…PERIOD!!!
So now they knock each over trying to get to a microphone to defend their position.And its documented with words,or better yet,how about there actions.
Anyone remember the leaders of the Democrats,such as the Speakers,Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Syria,how about Democrat Jimmy Carter meeting with hamas?
THE REAL….INCOVENIENT TRUTH

Posted by: Dennis | May 15, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

qazi63
Are you freakin’ kidding me? You think anyone’s gonna read that??? But, hey, congrats on figuring out the cut/paste feature on your new computer…

Posted by: SteveS | May 15, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I cannot sit by and watch this dem party tear apart our country. I can say I am proud to be switching parties the day Obama gets the nomination. Dean and Pelosi need to be run out of town.

Posted by: terry | May 15, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

How egocentric Americans – and Obama – are. I’m no Bush fan, but give him a break — doubt he had anyone specific in mind, but rather was vocalizing support for core themese of Israeli policy, i.e., we attack before others attack us, we don’t believe in promises we believe in action, we don’t talk w/our enemies until they’ve proven their good faith. Hmm, generally speaking, applauding your hosts/allies is a good thing. Do you really think Bush had to go to Israel to rain on Obama’s parade? – please.

Posted by: Seven | May 15, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

If democrats are so smart for America then why did they not keep the White House? President Bush is right.

Posted by: Willy | May 15, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

It is sad that people don’t remember how unfathomable it was for a U.S. President to sit down and talk to China and the U.S.S.R.. We ignored China for 30 years and then somehow was surprised that they were still around after all that time.

Posted by: ghostwriter | May 15, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

It’s nice to see the democrat elite lining up behind Obama. To bad the people aren’t!

Posted by: Decided | May 15, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

I’m an idependent from Fl and I have to say that I agree with bush on this one. You can not meet and talk with someone who is killing our soldiers and hates us. Right now i’m leaning to the republicans

Posted by: Johanna | May 15, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I’m an idependent from Fl and I have to say that I agree with bush on this one. You can not meet and talk with someone who is killing our soldiers and hates us. Right now i’m leaning to the republicans

Posted by: Johanna | May 15, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I don’t think I have ever agreed with Bush on anything but he was spot on when he said the world doesn’t revolve around Obama. Barrack is such an elitist.

Posted by: Carol | May 15, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Read these blogs and you will understand why the country is falling apart. The sad thing is, most of you on this blog probably have children! What a bunch of morons. Grow up people and get your head out of your butts!

Posted by: Dana | May 15, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

If Obama is the Nominee:
Hillary Supporters + GOP = McCain Landslide in November….
To: MSNBC/NBC/WashingtonPost/Newsweek/Time/NYTimes/Pelosi/Dean/Kerry/Edwards/Teddy Kenndedy
- Your dream world is about to End!

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

I sure hope Obama is not ‘mental.’ He had no reason to take Bush’s comments personally.

Posted by: SweetPea | May 15, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

I sure hope Obama is not ‘mental.’ He had no reason to take Bush’s comments personally.

Posted by: SweetPea | May 15, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Oh yeah Carol, he was spot on! Oh he really told Barack didn’t he. Yet another MORON! Stop hating on BO. He is not going to come and kill you and your family in the middle of the night. BO –elist. Where did you get your originality? Sad, sad, sad, Americans.

Posted by: Dana | May 15, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

I believe that President Bush was correctly pointing out the error of the ways of every naive, weak tyrant enabler that has ever taken a podium and pandered to the weak, at the expense of freedom and peace loving people in the world. I also believe that it is unfair to suggest that he was talking about the Democrat’s future nominee, however, if the shoe fits…

Posted by: Casini | May 15, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Matt, read a historical account of JFK and the Cuban Missile Crisis at http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761579929/cuban_missile_crisis.html instead of spouting utter rubish. JFK did not simply talk with Cuba or Russia. We had already instituted an embargo, cutting off all economic trade. He then armed anti-Castro Cuban exiles in 1961 in an effort to topple the Castro government; however, this was clearly an insufficient effort and they were soundly defeated by Castro’s army at the Bay of Pigs. Once it was determined that Russia’s missiles inside of Cuba posed a real threat to the U.S., “At first, President Kennedy favored a surgical air strike to destroy the missile bases alone, but this alternative was blocked on several fronts. McNamara remained firmly against the air strike, while Robert Kennedy continued to press his Pearl Harbor analogy. Together with Sorensen, the three men, comprising the President’s most trusted advisers, were united in a ‘triple alliance’ coalition against the air strike.” So, he settled for a naval blockade, while at the same time moving soldiers and equipment into place for a possible invasion of Cuba. Upon announcement of the blockade to Russia, “Kennedy warned that if Khrushchev fired missiles from Cuba, the result would be “a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.”. If you call this mere diplomacy or simply talking, you don’t know what you’re talking about. Also, you need to understand that Russia already had the nuclear weaponry (both in their own country and now in Cuba within striking distance of all of our major cities) which could kill millions. Bush is advocating that we don’t allow Iran to gain this capability before we do something to stop it.

Posted by: prm | May 15, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

I believe Bush has made America safer and was right to take the war on terror to our enemies. Iraq was the easiest target where we could create a strong hold in the middle east from which we could fight the war on terror. Iraq with its weak military and central location was a no brainer. Setting up a military base there is what we needed to do. If we pull out now or anytime soon it will make us look weak and destroy all the progress that we have made. Iran and the rest of the middle east most respect our strength and fear our rathe in order to maintain stability in the region. I know there is still a lot of work to be done but we will succeed. We can not sit down and talk with our enemies who hate our way of life. Talking with them in any way will make us appear weak. We must keep our guns pointed in their direction and destroy them if they get out of line. I hope McCain becomes President because he knows what needs to be done. He knows Bush was right. He knows that even though Bush is disliked by most people history will show that he made great step towards creating a better world for our grand kids. Obama wants peace in the world. Well I have news for Obama we can’t make peace with people who hate all that we stand for. We must eliminate the threat to our way of living. We can’t negotiate.

Posted by: Steven James | May 15, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

SweetPea – get over yourself. Can you not think of anything more than BO ‘mental’. You guys are so funny!

Posted by: Dana | May 15, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

What’s the matter, Obama…Can’t handle the truth??

Posted by: greg in oregon | May 15, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

I never really liked Dana Perrino but she is RIGHT ON…Obama is a egotistical smug jerk who DOES think he walks on water…and his kool aid followers swear he does too. For the 1st time in my life (beside Reagan) I am a democrate who will vote Republican in Nov if slimeball BHO is the nominee.

Posted by: babs | May 15, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Wow,
This one sure stired up the pot of poop!
Let me throw a completely different idea out there. “World Government” is behind much of what each of the Democrat candidates are all about. They conceal it reasonably well, unlike Al Gore, but it’s there nonetheless. Gore is the poster boy for pushing towards world government. How can any one country solve the global warming? The answer is that they can’t, but if they could just band together they could do it. But, how would we coordinate their efforts, and make sure that everyone put in their fair amount? Well we’d have to set up global agencies that would be under the oversight of perhaps ther UN, or a successor to the UN.
You see where this is going, right?
When you’re totally driven by power, and it’s the only thing that gets you high, what could top being “world leader”? Clinton’s turning over control of US troops to the UN, Gore’s dumb ass Global warming, and the subsequent religious cult like following are part of a longterm strategy to control all the countries on planet earth.
Yeah, I know this sounds like some nutty conspiracy theory, but if you do a little checking you’ll find that the folks that have these kind of thoughts actually think in 50 year cycles, and they are patient.
Americans are hated by a large portion of the global population. Sometimes the hatred is warranted, but most times not. Does anyone think that the average American’s life would improve under a world governing agency? If not, take a moment to figure out how to dislodge your head from your arse, turn off the radio, turn off the TV (even at the risk of missing what Brittany does next), and think about the things that matter to you, and a bit about how fragile the balance is out there that allows you the lifestyle that protects those things that you value. Then think about the plans that many politician have been putting out there over the last 20-25 years, and begin paying attention.
Everything that we have in this country is hanging in the balance.
Last word; Obama is a fraud and a joke
DieselBoatMan

Posted by: DieselBoatMan | May 15, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

If you think taxes are high in your state, try living in Obama’s home state of Ill. If he wasen’t unable to control spending there, what makes anyone think he could or would do anything in Washington. It would be a sad day if he were ever elected president.He is a good talker and that is all that he is. Most of it is hot air.I have a very good health plan so if your really want one too,get off your stupid butts and go to work like I did and don’t expect me or anyone to pay for your health plan.Vote for McCain. Someone who knows how to lead,
Bobj

Posted by: Robert Glen Jordan | May 15, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Wow,
This one sure stired up the pot of poop!
Let me throw a completely different idea out there. “World Government” is behind much of what each of the Democrat candidates are all about. They conceal it reasonably well, unlike Al Gore, but it’s there nonetheless. Gore is the poster boy for pushing towards world government. How can any one country solve the global warming? The answer is that they can’t, but if they could just band together they could do it. But, how would we coordinate their efforts, and make sure that everyone put in their fair amount? Well we’d have to set up global agencies that would be under the oversight of perhaps ther UN, or a successor to the UN.
You see where this is going, right?
When you’re totally driven by power, and it’s the only thing that gets you high, what could top being “world leader”? Clinton’s turning over control of US troops to the UN, Gore’s dumb ass Global warming, and the subsequent religious cult like following are part of a longterm strategy to control all the countries on planet earth.
Yeah, I know this sounds like some nutty conspiracy theory, but if you do a little checking you’ll find that the folks that have these kind of thoughts actually think in 50 year cycles, and they are patient.
Americans are hated by a large portion of the global population. Sometimes the hatred is warranted, but most times not. Does anyone think that the average American’s life would improve under a world governing agency? If not, take a moment to figure out how to dislodge your head from your arse, turn off the radio, turn off the TV (even at the risk of missing what Brittany does next), and think about the things that matter to you, and a bit about how fragile the balance is out there that allows you the lifestyle that protects those things that you value. Then think about the plans that many politician have been putting out there over the last 20-25 years, and begin paying attention.
Everything that we have in this country is hanging in the balance.
Last word; Obama is a fraud and a joke
DieselBoatMan

Posted by: DieselBoatMan | May 15, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

It’s easy for Obama to take shots at Bush. He’s not the one who has to make the decisions. Bush said the right things. Obama is an idiot. How he has gotten this far in his campaign is beyond me. Nothing he says make sense.
God help us if Obama gets elected; you thought Carter was bad; Obama will make Carter look like a genius.

Posted by: Denizio | May 15, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

“Obama is an intellectual tactician. He is a chess player, where Bush is a checkers player.”
And yet the checker player just got the chess player to associate himself with those who want Israel to negotiate with terrorists for all the world and America to see?
I suspect that Obama’s “brilliance” in on par with the great John Kerry’s, you know the D+ student who was going to dust Bush in 2004.
A truly smart man doesn’t do the stupid things that Obama does on a weekly basis.

Posted by: LogicalSC | May 15, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Oh my God, you people are idiots. When is Bush – or ANY of our past administrations – going to STOP PANDERING TO THE SICKENING JEW GARBAGE OF ISRAEL? They’ve received our help … they’re capable, self-sufficient, and militarily effective. Why do we need to hold hands with them exactly? Why do we need to utilize them in our petty political gamaes for statewide grandstanding? Please. Bush, along with the vast majority of D.C., needs to pull his head out. Don’t trust Israel.

Posted by: Tooter | May 15, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

This blog really blows my mind.
For all the Bush-blamers/bashers, NEWSFLASH: Bush is already gone! He is a LAME-DUCK. He is already gone, so cool your jets!
To get down to brass tacks and reality, folks……..does anyone remember all the promises that were made by Nancy-baby Pelosi and Harry “He-man” Reid? About the first “100 days” of Democratic control of Congress? Well, I believe it has been longer than 3 times that length of time, and look where we’re at. I think we’d all agree things weren’t “this bad” prior to their coronations, were they?
It becomes apparent that things started to tank just about the time the Dems took control.
Now, look at California: State run by Dems = State on verge of bankruptsy!
Take a look at Los Angeles in particular: City run by Dems = City on verge of bankruptsy!
So, complain about the high cost of gasoline, folks, and continue voting Dem. The only solution I heard them give to the high price of gas is to RAISE THE TAX ON GASOLINE!
That’s right…….that’s the ticket!
Gosh, this “ME-FIRST” generation has really taken over…..no point in looking at the long term…..just let me have my nice car, and ‘free-stuff’, and let’s just ignore the bigger picture, like the Rise of Islam.
What’s their answer? They don’t know. Just empty rhetoric.
Well, to hark back to the Vietnam days, “Kill’em all and let God sort’em out!”

Posted by: Wassamattawitcha? | May 15, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

To Mary who proudly voted for Bush, twice, congratulations – you’re an Fng idiot.

Posted by: RWilsonReagan | May 15, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

I’m a Republican and a Bush support, and let me just say: I enjoy raping young boys.

Posted by: SoCal Patriot | May 15, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

firest of all nobody in here know anything about the muslim faith to be a muslim you are not supposed to attack any non muslim unless they start fighting you in your own land and for me as a muslim I want to remind you about camp david and the peace deal between Egypt and Israil about 30 years ago by the way it was done while Carter was in office

Posted by: enas | May 15, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Those of you who are for the war do you really feel safer with all of our troops in Iraq?
When our soliders kill innocent by stander by mistake which happens all the time do you think were adding more fuel to the fire or do they undertsand were there to free everyone and make the wolrd a better place?
My guess is being over there were creating more terrorist.

Posted by: Chris | May 15, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Oh yeah Steven, he really took it to our enemies. Man we are really kicking their butts in Iraq and Afghanistan. The world is scared, really scared of the Bush administration. How are we winning? Let me hear something other than we have not been attacked. Be original if you can. Absolutely pathetic!!

Posted by: Dana | May 15, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Obama is terrible. We need to re-elect Bush so we can remain a country in lockstep with the conspiratorial gunrunning Jew traitors of Israel. For what reason? The Bible tells us so. HAIL THE AMERICAN-ISRAEL GOVERNANCE!

Posted by: Every Person on this board | May 15, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Even with all the confusing political spin attached to the “truth” these days, I believe Mr. Bush (or at least his speechwriters) has nailed it with a clarity that his interlopers on the Left just cannot understand. Some things are as clear as the nose on your face.. you just can’t appease terrorists.

Posted by: Jim Christian | May 15, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

“Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.”
Sun-tzu
Chinese general & military strategist (~400 BC)

Posted by: Eric | May 15, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Tooter – there’s a spot reserved for you in Hell my friend, right next to your butt buddy Hitler.

Posted by: MtSianai | May 15, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

HEY Dana does that include you? When we can’t express our opinions, smart or stupid, then we have a problem. When this country has issues we can complain. Try traveling abroad (China, Japan, Singapore) …you’ll kiss the ground when you land back home.
Go Bush

Posted by: JANET | May 15, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

history proves again and again that appeasement only encourages aggression.

Posted by: mungus | May 15, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Cheany! Stop The Torture! Now!

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

This is great. Do you people see the mood of the public? Obama has no chance when it gets to the general election. he is percieved as naive, weak, egotistical – and this is even before you get to the fact that he is incompetent. It is going to be a sluaghter

Posted by: Robert NYC | May 15, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Ladies and Gentlemen,
I just watched Obama sitting at a table
with his wife to his left. She did not
say pass me ____, she instead reached over his has while eating and grabbed
the bowl. I can just see the china
she will pick-out for the Whitehouse,
which by the way will is be the Whitehouse? The reality of all of this blogging is that white Americans evidently feel a guilt or fear towards blacks. When I watch Fox news, the guests that are black are so aggressive and talk over everyone. Manners have gone out the window. I remeber watching
the movie years ago called The Borrowers. In this movie a policeman states (English mind you) with his accent that glue is what binds society together. That invisible glue is cracking, and the black people of America can care less and truly most do dislike or hate whites. Are we going to
be in constant fear of guilt of race cards. Where are our rights.

Posted by: Suiter | May 15, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Robert Glen – not the infamous taxes. Oh boy wait until your taxes go sky high. Another pathetic comment. Go back to school or something please.

Posted by: Dana | May 15, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Um, the U.S Senator that Pres. Bush referred to was William Edgar Borah, a REPUBLICAN Senator from Idaho who also was a supporter of pro-Communist Soviet Union before the U.S. had any formal diplomatic relations with Moscow. And speaking of relations, he had a long-time affair with the married daughter of Teddy Roosevelt. God Bless America!

Posted by: tsunami32 | May 15, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

I’d rather have a President with Stage II Melomama than a President with all of the diseases Obama has, such as:
Stage IV Lack of BALLlS!
Stage X Militant Wifeoma
Stage X Smugoma
Stage X 20 year Hearing Loss.
Stage X Hamas Lovingoma
ps…my sister had stage IV melenoma almost 20 years ago and she is still around, thanks G-d.

Posted by: babara | May 15, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Obama — How many states are there in the United States? Not 57, take another guess. Dan Quayle couldn’t spell tomatos and that made him dumb according to the media. Obama doesn’t even know how many states there are and he responds to a comment that didn’t even mention him. That must make him a Moron.

Posted by: Dan | May 15, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Obama is not only an arrogant man but seems to be the favorite of all Wahhabist/Jihadist/Islamist. Why ?
I like is change talk but we need somebody who we can trust. He is a smooth talker who tells us what we want to hear but his actions(friendships with many Jihadist) tell a different tale.

Posted by: Arvind | May 15, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Suiter – are your parents as ignorant as you are? People like you make my day. It’s a new day in America — get use to it. Your time of control is over. Be afraid of the black people, be very afraid. Typical stupid comment from a hater.

Posted by: Dana | May 15, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

the honeymoon is over. At first all everyone talked about was how great obama was. His cult followers swooned and got teary eyed. WELL – now we have his racist priest, his racist wife, his ties to more crooks, bombers, bribery scams and he is starting to crack. He has no chance when it gets to the general election. Sure – he can give a speech but he cannot answer questions he has not been coached on ahead of time. he has no policies, no idea what he is doing – just trying to get by on being slick. Its all coming apart for the democrats now. What a completely incompetent party. Served up another chump.

Posted by: Robert NYC | May 15, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

When Obama made this error way back in that debate, I said it would bite him in the arse. And it is. One of many blunders the GOP will attack him on. This, Rev Wright, Black Liberation Theology, his stand on guns.. the list goes on. The democratic party is completely defunct.

Posted by: A reader in Georgia | May 15, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

When Obama is president all you war lovers can be the 28% that does not approve of him and that will be just fine with the 72% that do.
All of this retorhic about how we are safer because we sent our boys over to Iraq to be the Turkeys in a turkey shoot without a single shred of proof of the reasoning for being there in the first place. Everything that Bush and Cheney have said has been lies, but they are both very rich. In fact Bush can’t wait to get richer after we send him on his way. He can’t wait to fill the coffers. Those where his own words, and the only ones I believe.

Posted by: texas outlaw | May 15, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Hell, I wish Bush would stay in Washington, I hate hearing that he’s comeing back here to disrupt our way of life again. You bible thumpers need to find someplace for him to plant his feet. Hey, maybe he can go south & take the place of that church leader that died recently. You know, the one that spewed hate & played dirty tricks for Bush on McCain.

Posted by: Sue,Texas | May 15, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Absolutely straight on. I am proud of President Bush. This is something the libs cannot stomach, like I give a rats a. We will destroy this enemy, the same as we did Russia! Hussein Obama is burnt toast, can I get an Amen!

Posted by: KansasGirl | May 15, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

We are not winning the war on terror. But we must continue on the path that Bush has put us on in order to win. I know McCain feels the same way and will continue the fight in Iraq fight terror on their turf. America is much safer now. Our airports are safer and our government has kept its ear to the ground making it impossible for terrorists to make a move in our country. He has shown extremists throughout the world that Terror will not be tolerated. Obama wants to not only tolerate it but he wants to have a freindly chat with them.

Posted by: Steven James | May 15, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Mr.B.H.Obama is showing his lack of statesmanship in foreign affairs. Why is he so sensitive to that remark? If the shoe fits??? The more Mr. B. H. Obama speaks the more we get to know the “Real” Obama and it makes me even more concerned that he could be our President!

Posted by: Bob | May 15, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

LOL Robert in NYC. Spot on.

Posted by: An opinion | May 15, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Arvind – yeah, he’s a fav of terrorist. Another unoriginal comment. So funny. So, so funny. I hope you don’t have off-spring. If you do, give them up so they can grow up without fear. I have another idiot here!!

Posted by: Dana | May 15, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

I’m voting for the guy who angers his parties base the most, which is one barometer for where his loyalties lie, the United States – not a parties agenda. Obama’s history and campaign tell me he is loyal first to the party, then the United States.

Posted by: go_figure | May 15, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

It amazes me how Bush haters believe their own made up lies and vitriol.
YOU DON’T NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS!
Some of these posts are perfect examples of how hate utterly blinds you.
We live in one of the greatest countries in the world enjoying the greatest level of wealth we have ever experienced, the highest level of home ownership with the biggest houses ever, the highest stock market ever, and on and on. Europeans are electing conservatives and are pro-American, and millions of people want to come here and live.
Yet, all you spew is hate and negativism. You are sad, sad people.
You vote for Obama and you’ll get exactly what you deserve.

Posted by: WSBowles | May 15, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Tooter – there’s a spot reserved for you in Hell my friend, right next to your butt buddy Hitler.

Posted by: MtSianai | May 15, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Is it a coincidence that Lebanon is now a battlefield within the month that Jaime Carter played kisseeface with terrorist leaders?? Just a coincidence Hamas is slamming long range Iranian/Syrian/North Korean missles into occupied Israel targets??
Keep on thinking it is a coincidence….just like Neville Chamberlain did………along with FDR for over 5 horrific years of suffering by our British allies!!

Posted by: OBIWAN | May 15, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

As far as Obama’s outrage along with all of the other hot shot Dems (Pelosi, Clinton, Biden, Kerry)regarding Bush’s appeasement comment, I go back to my childhood when I first heard the saying “IF THE SHOE FITS WEAR IT!”

Posted by: bILL | May 15, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Obama is loyal to Obama first and I am not sure he can count to two.

Posted by: Robert NYC | May 15, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

“JESUS WAS A LIBERAL, HE WASN’T WHITE AND HE LOVED HIS ENEMY! Would you have voted for him?”
Posted by: rebelyell | May 15, 2008 3:27:49 PM
================================
No, I wouldn’t, because I believe in the separation of church and state. As Jesus said, “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s.”
He also made clear to his followers that he was not the ‘warlord (secular) king’ that the people of David had their hearts set on, which is why many of the Jewish people could not accept Him as the Messiah.
If you are going to use religious principles as your argument, try to at least first be familiar with the actual religion.

Posted by: hosanna | May 15, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

It is a known fact that people with a college eduction tend to be LIBERAL and Scarety cat dummies tend to be RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVE. These are the ones that fear tactics and hateful one liners work on. These are the ones that came out and voted for Bush. You can argue that they are the ones that put America in the predicament that it is in now.Reading some of these postings make me feel for my beloved country. They are still quaking in their fear and boiling in their hate and will not rest till they tear this country down. God help America!!

Posted by: REAL DEAL | May 15, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

7 yrs since an attack. It was over 8yrs from the time of the attack on the towers before that. These people will take there time. They don’t believe in our concept of time they believe in their relegion ruling all. They don’t care how long it takes. They will wait and then strike. Al Queda is stronger now then it ever was before Bush came along. All the experts can confirm that. The reason is because of all the killing we have done.

Posted by: texas outlaw | May 15, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Obama has hope! he hopes he can be president! Thats all he has. Policies, ummmm, zero. Bills sponsored on the Senate, ummmm, zero (he actually has not even worked as a Senator besides getting directions to the free lunch room before going back on campaign). Listen – get back to reality – all the guy does well is make a speech. He would make an excellent press secretary, actor, street corner preacher or leader of a marching band. JUST AS LONG AS HE DOES NOT HAVE TO THINK! 57 States! Hilarious! If its not on the teleprompter the man is lost!

Posted by: Robert NYC | May 15, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

“When has a Republican ever won a war? Don’t even say Persian Gulf—Bush I was too scared to take out that S.O.B. when he got the chance.”
==========================
I believe Mr. Lincoln was a Republican. Too bad he won his war.

Posted by: lol | May 15, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Left Wingers are always sympathetic to terrorists. They’re worried about them being waterboarded, having lawyers and being held without a sissy left wing lawyer. Left Wingers were the idiots that wanted to create a human shield for Saddam. left Wingers are the morons that want to sit down with Ahmadinejad, Chavez, and Bashar al-Assad. They grovel at the feet of these supporters of terrorism. Left Wingers should all hang.

Posted by: Left Wingers Suck | May 15, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

I’m a total liberal douchebag. There, I said it.

Posted by: SoCal Patriot | May 15, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Hey “Everybody on this Board”, re-elect Bush? Maybe you should get out of your mom’s basement for a few hours, go to the library, and read the Constitution numbnuts. With morons like this, who needs Islamo-fascist enemies.

Posted by: conlawprof | May 15, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Obama is showing his lack of experiance and forignpolicy knowledge. All you Obama supporters were out there giving Hillary a huge margin of victory over all other Democratic rivals. Now a few feel good speeches later and you’ve switched your allegiances to Barack. What gravitas can Barack bring to the table when he does meet with Iran and Syria. His Senate experience, education, maybe that he wrote two books, what? He’s an empty suit who speaks quite eloquently, and thats all the Democrats have to justify him being elected PRESIDENT. Please Democrats take a minute and study this mans past, read his past writings, his work in Chicago, his association with known domestic terrorists, and I’m refering to Alder. Hillary is a beeter choice than Barack, and this coming from a Reagan Republican

Posted by: Mijaha | May 15, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

>>President Bush is right. If Obama is elected, terrorist may use our commercial airplanes and fly them into our tall buildings and kill people. Vote republican!<<
An attack that was planned for years on Clinton's watch, as he let Osama skate while he chased after Bill Gates, David Koresh, and Randy Weaver. The blood of 9/11 is on Clinton's hands

Posted by: dave | May 15, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Bless Senator Joseph Biden for his visceral reaction to more of W Bush’s Treasonous conduct in the name of all Americans. Where is the outrage on all sides of the aisle? When will American wake up and recognize the Republican Party is SHAM. It is the part of spoiled brats, trust fund kids and those who avoid military service whenever possible but belittle the rest of us for not wearing flag pins and being soft on terror. The bottom line is the BUSH/CHENEY ADMINISTRATION was at best STUPID ON TERROR and at worst engaged in acts of TREASON against the interests of Americans. This country needs to stand up and denounce the current administration when it engages in RECKLESS NEOCON SKULL DRUDGERY. The current administration has undermined every aspect of America’s standing in the world today. By any standard, liberal or conservative, democratic, republican or independent BUSH/CHENEY=the most corrupt administration in the history of America. The problem with this neocon mindset is that they think the enemy is the other political party and moral, righteous, well thinking, concerned American citizens who question the manner in which they run our country. To go to Israel and equate Democratic Senators with NAZI APPEASERS lowers the bar so damn low, especially when HISTORY MAKES CLEAR THAT IT IS THE BUSH FAMILY HAS TIES TO NAZI’S. Prescott Bush was a Nazi Financier who supported the 3RD REICH. Bush/Cheney should be indicted and jailed for TREASON.

Posted by: Christopher London | May 15, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

REAL DEAL I am conservative and college educated. It is the conservatives that are willing to join the service and defend your educated sorry lazy ass. You need to thank us.

Posted by: billy bob | May 15, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Bless Senator Joseph Biden for his visceral reaction to more of W Bush’s Treasonous conduct in the name of all Americans. Where is the outrage on all sides of the aisle? When will American wake up and recognize the Republican Party is SHAM. It is the part of spoiled brats, trust fund kids and those who avoid military service whenever possible but belittle the rest of us for not wearing flag pins and being soft on terror. The bottom line is the BUSH/CHENEY ADMINISTRATION was at best STUPID ON TERROR and at worst engaged in acts of TREASON against the interests of Americans. This country needs to stand up and denounce the current administration when it engages in RECKLESS NEOCON SKULL DRUDGERY. The current administration has undermined every aspect of America’s standing in the world today. By any standard, liberal or conservative, democratic, republican or independent BUSH/CHENEY=the most corrupt administration in the history of America. The problem with this neocon mindset is that they think the enemy is the other political party and moral, righteous, well thinking, concerned American citizens who question the manner in which they run our country. To go to Israel and equate Democratic Senators with NAZI APPEASERS lowers the bar so damn low, especially when HISTORY MAKES CLEAR THAT IT IS THE BUSH FAMILY HAS TIES TO NAZI’S. Prescott Bush was a Nazi Financier who supported the 3RD REICH. Bush/Cheney should be indicted and jailed for TREASON.

Posted by: Christopher London | May 15, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Hey Obama – I am going to open a street corner t-shirt booth. I think you are very qualified to sell t-shirts for me. No… dont worry, I’ll take the money and make the change. We all know you cant count and I have actually listened to you stubmle through your idea of an economic policy. You just stand there and do what you do best – talk. Now dont strain yourself, just keep talking – you look pretty and no one is really taking anything you say seriously anyway. If you get lost again just read the notes I taped to your arm and smile a lot. HEY – heres an idea – if you get stuck just say anything about ‘hope’ – that always goes over well. The stupid people always eat that one up.

Posted by: Robert NYC | May 15, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

uh, don’t you idiots realize congress makes the laws and policies, not the president. who has controlled congress since 2006? duh

Posted by: kp | May 15, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

We talked and talked with the Hussein regime and it got us nowhere. It wasn’t until there was a credible threat of force that he allowed the inspectors back in to be led around by the nose. Obama is naive if he thinks that these thugs running these countries use diplomacy and anything other than a delaying tactic. He is terribly naive and that is dangerous.

Posted by: IOpian | May 15, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

uh, don’t you idiots realize congress makes the laws and policies, not the president. who has controlled congress since 2006? duh

Posted by: kp | May 15, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Hey “Everybody on this Board”, re-elect Bush? Maybe you should get out of your mom’s basement for a few hours, go to the library, and read the Constitution numbnuts. With morons like this, who needs Islamo-fascist enemies.

Posted by: conlawprof | May 15, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

“My guess is being over there were creating more terrorist. ”
Guess? Guess,huh? Think of it this way, a large number of Islamists from all over the ME have filtered into Iraq and died at the hands of our military. Even delusional idiots will read the writing on the wall…”Goto Iraq, die and painful, anonymous death? The terrorists in Iraq who have gotten so desperate that the latest suicide bombers have been young kids and mental retarded women.
The Iraqis know, even if the Daily Kos doesn’t, that it is the terrorists that have been the ones murdering Iraqis in the markets, buses and mosques, not Americans. Only in leftist circles is it believed that the vast majority of Iraqi deaths been the result of the American military.

Posted by: LogicalSC | May 15, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

WHY DO LIBERALS STILL HATE AMERICA?

Posted by: popcorn | May 15, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Bush is the idot and the people that still support him are scared wussy lemmings.

Posted by: texas outlaw | May 15, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Obama is an idiot…anyone who listens to him or would think of voting for him is…..dumber than a box of rocks. Look at the people he surrounds himself with. Birds of a Obama feather together….simply put racist and anti-American. Let us all hear the details of his plans for change. Duh…change us to a 3rd world socialist country????

Posted by: jj boss | May 15, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Bush will soon be hiding in a bush with McCain. Obama/Clinton will roll into the Black/White house in November. Bye the way, did he find those weapons of mass destruction while over there in the middle east. Aye Bush, tell Osama Bin Laden hey if you see him. Oops! YOU CAN’T FIND HIM! YOU ARE A LOSER!!!

Posted by: David King | May 15, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

THE BUSH FAMILY has a historical connection with the NAZI PARTY. W should know better than to open this can of worms. Where do you think America’s NEOCONSERVATIVE TACTICS are derived from?
How Bush’s grandfather helped Hitler’s rise to power: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Bush Nazi Connections: http://ecosyn.us/Bush-Hitler/
The Nazi Bush Regime: http://www.rense.com/general67/amnaz.htm

Posted by: Christopher London | May 15, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

It would seem W hit a nerve.
I just LOVE watching liberals pitch a snit when someone smacks them across the face with the truth!

Posted by: George | May 15, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Pardon me, Mr. Crazed Murderer. Once you get done removing that man’s head from his body, I’d like to talk to you about your needs.

Posted by: Dan | May 15, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Seriously, i don’t personally think Barack Obama should respond to Bush remarks about “NAZI” which is obviously he’s lame duck president that’ll never be on americans good history book. President that’s full of himself turned surplus economy to deficit, fighting two unpopular war at the same time, american dollar lost value around the globe,gas price jumping up everymonth,mortgage losing values on hard working american citizens, education is going through hard time e.t.c shows he’s out of touch every soul around the world waiting on him to move out of white house fall dissing on obama to score political points is nonsense.
YES.WE.CAN
OBAMA ’08

Posted by: Abdul Olufowobi | May 15, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Yes, that’s right. Let’s all vote for the Democrat candidate for President, House Representative and Senator. Then these “progressives” could mandate that everyone attend sensitivity courses so that we may all understand the Muslim way of life. And while we’re at it we can allow for laws that will ensure that the Muslim way of life become increasingly integrated into American society. See, because if we are nice to them and bend over backwards not to offend, then everything will be wonderful. Wake up you niaive, misguided little sheep, they (your wonderful candidates) are pulling the wool over your eyes and expoiting you for your vote. Beware, if we are not careful, the will and determination of the Muslim movement will one day take over our dimwitted sentimentalities and lack of will.

Posted by: t-bone | May 15, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

I would like to hear more on the blog from Muslims in the US. How do they feel about what is happening over there? Do they really believe that Ahkmenajad (sp) is sane? If they don’t, why don’t they speak up and denounce him?? BHO (finally) denounced Reverend Wright – and he’s not nearly as lethal as the whack job heading up Iran. I am voting for Obama, because I feel like the mideast is going to go up in flames – very soon – and I don’t want our people to be there. If the terrorists “come over here” as we’ve been threatened, if our military is here they can do something to protect.

Posted by: Pam | May 15, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

anyone want to talk to a terrorist? go right on and sit down with them. you’ll come back without a head…

Posted by: john | May 15, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

“It is a known fact that people with a college eduction tend to be LIBERAL and Scarety cat dummies tend to be RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVE.”
==========================
Well, I’m glad YOU know that fact. Personally, I have a Ph.D, an M.B.A, and an A.B. (Harvard). And I wouldn’t vote for Obama even if his opponent was bin Laden.

Posted by: just the facts, ma'am | May 15, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

“But Obama DID say he wanted to negotiate with terrorists. Launching an attack on Bush does not change that fact”
You are correct.

Posted by: Bob | May 15, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

BUSH IS BUSHED! McCAIN IS TOASTED! GET OUT OF IRAQ! NOW!!!!

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

I never heard the President mention Obama by name, as CNN Blitzer just told me. Do they report factual news or do they just make it up as they go along. I guess if the shoe fits you might find yourself in his speech. Where was this same outcry when the Dems went overseas an made statements to undermind the Administration. Good for the President.

Posted by: homjett | May 15, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Wait a minute…
WHY IS EVERYONE MAD AT BUSH?!?! This comment is completely legitimate and had nothing to do with Obama (he is SO self-absorbed to think so) but was directed to Ms. Pelosi making a trip over there, and Mr. Carter for doing “peace talks” with Jamas, and all of the other delusional dems who think that talking a BLUE streak stops war.

Posted by: Glenda | May 15, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

History will show that Bush was right and made the right decisions when it came to the war on terror. If McCain is elected the history books will show that America stayed strong and eventually won the war on terror. If Obama is elected history will show a world falling into chaos with terrorists running free to destroy everything.

Posted by: Steven James | May 15, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

If Bush was talking about anyone it was about JIMMY CARTER and frankly, that was the only one I figured he was talking about until Obama started ranting “I don’t do that!!” Is that guilt talking, BO? You protest this much and makes me wonder why. Best thing to do is go ahead and insert the foot directly into your mouth to keep from saying anything else this stupid.
Interesting take on history re: Dems winning wars. Korean War was started during Truman’s final term in office and he and his generals can take plenty of credit for why it went so badly. Eisenhower was President for only 6 months when the armistice was signed so I doubt he had much impact on it other than knowing how badly it had been run.
Oh yeah – seems that a Republican Prez named Abraham Lincoln managed to a little conflict called the American Civil War. Strike 2 on the theory that Dems are the only ones who can win a war. Perhaps you need to find someone new to tell you bedtime stories. Of course, that was back in the day when the President considered himself an American, not a party hack.

Posted by: bavolet | May 15, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

BUSHY BUSH! STOP THE TORTURE! NOW!

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

It is a known fact that people with a college eduction tend to be LIBERAL and Scarety cat dummies tend to be RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVE…
Posted by: REAL DEAL | May 15, 2008 4:49:41 PM
ever hear of Dr. Condi Rice? How about Dr. Newt Gingrich?
Sounds like YOU are the uneducated one.LOL

Posted by: look into the mirror | May 15, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

after the dust settles build a giant supercenter in the middle of iran and turn the rest of the country into a parking lot. satan is alive and well in terroist movement. and he knows what he is doing. wake up civilized world.

Posted by: jct | May 15, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Wow!
I didn’t see Obama/Pelosi/Daschle
this mad when the Democratic Party
decided it was fine to disenfranchise
FL and MI voters….
Yet, Ditzy Pelosi is hammering the
President of The United States while
he is in Israel to celebrate their
60′th Anniversary as a Nation!
Pelosi/Obama/Daschle have no shame,
no class and no grace
Mediocrity is their first and last name…Hussein is their savior’s
Middle Name!

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Wake up you idiots!!!! Yes let’s continue the same policies that we have for the last 8 years because they have worked so well for us. Iran is closer to aquiring nuclear weapons, we still have not resolved the N. Korea crisis and the war in Iraq has been the biggest recruiting tool for Bin Laden ever. Yes That has worked like a dream. Many on here spew ignorance out of hate or just plain old stupidity. Get the facts straight and get a life. All these Bush supportes, LMAO; he has really improved your lives , right? Remember this: It is best to be thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt.

Posted by: Ken from Atlanta | May 15, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Pam:
“if our military is here they can do something to protect.”
And what would that be, since the US military is prohibited from conducting operations in the US? In what world is it where the leftist in this country are going to let anyone do anything to protect cities or people here from Islamist terrorists. They blew up the World Trade center in our most liberal city and a majority of liberals and leftist believe it was conservatives and President Bush? Any attempt to find anyway to protect American citizens has lead not to alternative suggestion but by invoking of comparison of Bush to Hitler.
Face it, nothing is going to be implemented to protect citizens here in America. Our only hope is on the foolishness of our enemies and hope you do not live in one of the large cities.

Posted by: LogicalSC | May 15, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Bush has certainly made his fair share of mistakes. Overall I’d rate his presidency as mediocre to average, but his comments to the Israeli Knesset were right on the money. Obama is setting himself up to be the next Jimmy Carter, or worse yet, Neville Chamberlain. The bottom line is that for all of Bush’s faults, this country has not been attacked since 9/11 and it is becoming increasingly apparent that this nation is safer due to his policies.
This RFK wannabe (Obama) thinks he’ll be able to sweet talk the pariahs of the world into ended support for terrorism, abandoning WMD programs, etc, etc. Ahamdinejad, Medvedev, Assad, Kim, Chavez and all the rest are just going to laugh in his face….

Posted by: pogmahone | May 15, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

These are some of the stupidest comments I have ever read. God help this country with these people voting.

Posted by: Jay | May 15, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

>> What a mature way to deal with people who threaten you. Instead of speaking to them as peers, you point guns at them
- Doug
THAT statement is EXACLY WHY cut-and-run appeasers don’t get it … Doug, they are NOT our peers. When they spend the same percentage of their resources on helping the world instead of ONLY helping themselves, THEN they will be our peers. Not only have THEY CHOSEN not to be our peers by spending ALL their resources on their own selfish endeavors, but they target the civilians of those nations who HAVE chosen to be our peers.
It’s the secularist pitfall … not to make ANY judgment at all, even one base on common senses, and assumes that the word sovereign in the term ‘sovereign nation’ mean equals.
And to think that it does, PROVES a level of ignorance that could also be categorized as IMMATURE.

Posted by: Jon | May 15, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I can see it now, Obama negeotiates with a terrorist Obama-UH MR. Terrorist I think you need to change your ways. Terrorist- Mr. Obama I am going to cut your fricking head off. Obama- Err Mr. terrorist have you not heard some of my great change speeches? Terrorist- I am going to shove your head up your arss after I cut it off. Obama- Hmmmm What about my great “lets negeotiate with terrorist speeches”? Terrorist- Bring in the video crew. Obama- maby old George was right? Terrorist-rmm rmmm rmmmm (chainsaw). I wonder who his V.P. pick is?

Posted by: Billy bob | May 15, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I think the Democratic Senators protest too much! The truth is painful and this group of appeasers would sell us to the highest bidder (not that our economy isn’t already being sold by our current administration fiscal irresponsibility). I am 61 and I have never had such a sense of dread over the future of our country. I’m afraid it will take something a bit bigger than 9/11 to wake up the loons in this country who think that somehow if we are just “nice” to our enemies, they will just go away and mind their own business. Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it’s mistakes. Just how stupid is the left wing of our political privilaged class? We’ll certainly have the opportunity to find out in the next few years and it’s going to very painful for all of us.

Posted by: Dennis in Ohio | May 15, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Folks, it seems some people are uncomfortable with Obama, but it’s also
obvious that the Republican approach has meant big trouble both for international relations and military strategy and readiness. McCain in large part wants to continue current policies. That’s enough to make me uncomfortable with McCain.

Posted by: jn | May 15, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Bush is smarter than people give him credit for. He knew there weren’t any WMD in Iraq, but we needed to show the terrorists that we had the power to destroy them. Taking to war to them and fighting them on their turf allows us the keep them occupied in Iraq so that they won’t attack us here in America. Bush was smart enough to know that the average person in America is easily lead to believe anything that the government tells them if they say it enough times. Bush knew that it worked when the Nazis did and he knew it would work on the American people to. The American people don’t always know what is best for them. Bush knew what was best and had the courage to stand up for it even when people turned on him. Obama sways to what the people want trying to appease them. Just like he wants to appease the terrorists.

Posted by: Steven James | May 15, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Anyone as thin-skinned as Obama has no business being in the presidential race. Bush was stating the obvious fact that appeasment does not work with terrorist nations, and Obama took it personally. He is paranoid and really scary!

Posted by: JC | May 15, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

As I recall, the journalist Daniel Pearl tried to talk to terrorists — was even going to print their side of the story, as he was arranging to conduct an interview. Look where that got him.
Oh, I forgot, all you anti-Jew, anti-Israel posters(I won’t say anti-Semite, because Arabs are Semitic people as well) probably thought what happened to Mr. Pearl was a GOOD thing.

Posted by: hosanna | May 15, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

I really don’t understand why the Democrats are so up in arms over this. More than one (Carter and Obama) have said that both sides need to be included in any negotiations (peace discussions). Even some Democratic supporters have commented they agree with this point. And now that Bush has brought up an obvious counterpoint, they’re all worked up! What gives?

Posted by: LongT | May 15, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Home run George Bush… the Dems rear ends are so high up in the air right now its going to take a scaffold to bring them down!!!

Posted by: Don | May 15, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

THE AMERICAN FUROR BUSHY BUSH! GET OUT OF IRAQ! NOW!

Posted by: Sisto Maximo | May 15, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Poor baby Obama can’t take it. He avoids tuff interviews, needs a teleprompter and his surrogates are spiteful people. Bush is right, he has kept this country safe and by the way, UBL declared war on us when Clinton was Pres and he did nothing. Obama is a naive, narcissistic hypocrite. The statement has been made by Bush before Obama was around. Obambi will weaken this country and bend over for his Hamas supporters. Why was one of his advisers meeting with Hamas and what were the conversations about? Has anyone been able to even ask the question? Obama is sooo smart he didn’t pick up on THE FACT that Wright hates America.

Posted by: Kathy | May 15, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Ken from Atlanta
Yep…you changed my perspective. All that stuff happened because of GWB. He is indeed the antichrist.
Or maybe we should consider this…
Had the Dems been in office the last 8 years, Iran would ALREADY have nuclear weapons, North Korea would have forcibly annexed South Korea and Bin Laden and his ilk would be striking targets in the US at will.
You libs love to point the finger, but never seem to step up to the plate and offer solutions other than to suggest doing the opposite of what you decry. Never anything of substance, much like your presidential Candidates for the last 60 years…get over yourself you elitist coward. Offer solutions or keep your party off the ticket.

Posted by: SteveS | May 15, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Bush is smarter than people give him credit for. He knew there weren’t any WMD in Iraq, but we needed to show the terrorists that we had the power to destroy them. Taking to war to them and fighting them on their turf allows us the keep them occupied in Iraq so that they won’t attack us here in America. Bush was smart enough to know that the average person in America is easily lead to believe anything that the government tells them if they say it enough times. Bush knew that it worked when the Nazis did and he knew it would work on the American people to. The American people don’t always know what is best for them. Bush knew what was best and had the courage to stand up for it even when people turned on him. Obama sways to what the people want trying to appease them. Just like he wants to appease the terrorists.

Posted by: Steven James | May 15, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

I know about Muslims OK I’m taking Asian Humanities and we learn about Islam. So fisheater or whatever the thing was you’re not going to convince me that muslims are evil so whatever.

Posted by: Hannah | May 15, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Bush is smarter than people give him credit for. He knew there weren’t any WMD in Iraq, but we needed to show the terrorists that we had the power to destroy them. Taking to war to them and fighting them on their turf allows us the keep them occupied in Iraq so that they won’t attack us here in America. Bush was smart enough to know that the average person in America is easily lead to believe anything that the government tells them if they say it enough times. Bush knew that it worked when the Nazis did and he knew it would work on the American people to. The American people don’t always know what is best for them. Bush knew what was best and had the courage to stand up for it even when people turned on him. Obama sways to what the people want trying to appease them. Just like he wants to appease the terrorists.

Posted by: Steven James | May 15, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

I’m pleasantly surprised at all the moral support for the President here on a “hostile” ABC site.
But we really do need to quit “wasting” money fighting terrorism that could be better “invested” in domestic programs that destroy our work ethic.

Posted by: Dave Gearhart | May 15, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

“If you can’t dazle them with brilliance then riddle them with bullets. – unknown”
We’ve talked to Iran long enough. It’s time to stop negotiating and start threatening. An F-22 flyover of Tehran would accomplish more than a thousand hours of pointless talk.

Posted by: C4Casey | May 15, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

McCain spent more time as a POW than Obama has spent in the U.S. Senate!
Obama has spent 20 more years sitting
in the pews of a Racist, Anti-American
Church than McCain and Hillary…
Thats one area Obama has more experience
than anybody else: hangin with racists,
terrorists, muslims and Anti-Americans

Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 15, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Yes We Can…raise the white flag!

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Listen to the liberal demos holler, that means it hit home to all the apeasers. Stick it to um, mccain needs to take a lesson.

Posted by: jwar | May 15, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

John McCain is the only candidate who can be trusted with this nation’s national security. Yea, he has temper issues, but when the time comes, I believe he will make rational decisions.
Whether you believe that the invasion of Iraq was right or wrong, its irrelevant, we’re there. We need nothing short of victory. Victory in Iraq could be a revolution in the Middle East, a liberal democracy flourishing in the Arab world would change the ideology of the region forever. Failure would make America even more vulnerable, and our status as a superpower would be diminished, leaving Russia, China and Iran to fill the gap…

Posted by: pogmahone | May 15, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

>> Folks, it seems some people are uncomfortable with Obama, but it’s also
obvious that the Republican approach has meant big trouble both for international relations and military strategy and readiness. McCain in large part wants to continue current policies. That’s enough to make me uncomfortable with McCain.
- JN
That is a fair argument, JN … the success of the current strategy should be debated. But to go back to the policy which CREATED the necessity for the current policy, one in which we are NOT proactively engaged in countering our enemies, is foolish.
Even if the current policy, one we have been pursuing for a mere 8 years, was deemed to be A COMPLETE failure without any redeeming side effects, then to suggest we go back to a policy that not only failed, but emboldened and strengthened our enemies for CENTURIES, is the very definition of stupid.

Posted by: Jon | May 15, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

“If you can’t dazle them with brilliance then riddle them with bullets. – unknown”
We’ve talked to Iran long enough. It’s time to stop negotiating and start threatening. An F-22 flyover of Tehran would accomplish more than a thousand hours of pointless talk.

Posted by: C4Casey | May 15, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Bush is smarter than people give him credit for. He knew there weren’t any WMD in Iraq, but we needed to show the terrorists that we had the power to destroy them. Taking to war to them and fighting them on their turf allows us the keep them occupied in Iraq so that they won’t attack us here in America. Bush was smart enough to know that the average person in America is easily lead to believe anything that the government tells them if they say it enough times. Bush knew that it worked when the Nazis did and he knew it would work on the American people to. The American people don’t always know what is best for them. Bush knew what was best and had the courage to stand up for it even when people turned on him. Obama sways to what the people want trying to appease them. Just like he wants to appease the terrorists.

Posted by: Steven James | May 15, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

It’s ridiculous to even compare Hitler to Ahmadinejad. Hitler invaded nation after nation, including France, Yugoslavia, Russia, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, Holland, Luxemborg, Greece, Poland, etc., etc.
Hitler had gas chambers executing millions and millions of people.
What country has Ahmadinejad invaded? What gas chambers do the Iranians have? There are Jews in the Iranian Parliament who serve freely, and Jewish people living in Iran freely.
Republicans want Ahmadinejad to be our new boogie man. He’s our new Saddam Hussein. Just like Saddam, Ahmadinejad is equally powerless. He is not at war with us. He does not call for the USA to be attacked.
Even Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condi Rice, in Bush’s own administration, want to meet, or have met, with Iranians. Bush came to agreements with Gaddafi in Libya. Bush made a deal with Kim Jong Il in North Korea. Are those appeasements??? No, Bush actually deserves credit for realizing cowboy diplomacy won’t help those issues.

Posted by: Say What | May 15, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Probably the same people who repeatedly punch the elevator button thinking it’ll make it come to them faster…

Posted by: SteveS | May 15, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

I think we should talk with Iran.
In fact, I think we should share our nuclear technology with them. Let’s drop a few on their pathetic country today.

Posted by: Share with Iran | May 15, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I think we should talk with Iran.
In fact, I think we should share our nuclear technology with them. Let’s drop a few on their pathetic country today.

Posted by: Share with Iran | May 15, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I think we should talk with Iran.
In fact, I think we should share our nuclear technology with them. Let’s drop a few on their pathetic country today.

Posted by: Share with Iran | May 15, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I think we should talk with Iran.
In fact, I think we should share our nuclear technology with them. Let’s drop a few on their pathetic country today.

Posted by: Share with Iran | May 15, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I think we should talk with Iran.
In fact, I think we should share our nuclear technology with them. Let’s drop a few on their pathetic country today.

Posted by: Share with Iran | May 15, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Republican party is on its last legs. MCCBUSH is going down to defeat this November along with his old,tired,meanspirited Republican party and his friend George Bush….Good riddance…

Posted by: Johnny K | May 15, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

This board is clearly filled with right wing fruitcakes who equate reasoned, deliberate thinking with being out of touch, UnAmerican and exposing us to greater risks from terrorists. However, most of you who support the BUSH/CHENEY ADMINISTRATION’S foreign policy are not well balanced enough to recognize that people who’s opinions are different than yours are not YOUR ENEMY but rather are fellow American citizens who believe that this Administrations methodology and approach is flawed and is an abject failure. So do me a favor and spare me, my fellow Americans who operate on the right side (thinking side) of the bell curve and are not swinging from trees with our tails between our legs like NEOCONS, most of whom TALK TOUGH but never don the uniform and actually serve this country. THEY ARE THE ELITISTS only they got you duped into thinking that photo ops down on the ranch and chats from a bullhorn or the back of a pick up truck make em just like you. Sad part is too many people are way too stupid to realize it is all a script to play you into their way of thinking. NEOCONS count on your mindless stupidity. Thank you for giving it to them. The truth is W BUSH is a tough talking pansy boy who was handed everything to him in life and should have had his ass kicked earlier in life. Then maybe he would have grown into a man.

Posted by: Christopher London | May 15, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

“I know about Muslims OK I’m taking Asian Humanities and we learn about Islam. So fisheater or whatever the thing was you’re not going to convince me that muslims are evil so whatever.
Posted by: Hannah | May 15, 2008 5:29:47 PM
========
But the question is “are you PASSING Asian Humanities?”
You told us earlier that you are Jewish. Perhaps some day you will have the opportunity to visit Israel. OBVIOUSLY, not ALL Muslims are evil — but such a trip will show you (perhaps even if you manage to escape personal injury at the time of a suicide bombing or a rocket attack) that Muslim TERRORISTS are evil, and that is the group with whom Mr. Obama proposes to chat.

Posted by: Hosanna | May 15, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

All these folks on here shouting about shoot first ask questions later, I hope they have sons and daughters in the millitary.
These WAR MONGERS Cheney and Bush would be pissing themselves in a foxhole but take no issue with shoot first diplomacy.
Sure terrorists are awful, but what are we to an Iraqi family who no longer has their mother or father because a bomb we dropped or a gun we shot missed?

Posted by: Peter | May 15, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Obama is sooooooooo weak! He’s making me realize that I’m kind of glad that McCain has a temper. At least he has the capability of being tough when necessary and not just whining about everything. I think we now know who wears the pants in the Obama family and her name starts with “M”.

Posted by: Jeff | May 15, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

sounds to me judging from these comments Bush must have knocked Barry for a loop without even mentioning his name. Sure fired up all you LIBS. Looks like it does not take much to rattle the new messia.

Posted by: scott | May 15, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I can’t believe how impossible the majority of the USA is. First most jump to the assumption that Iran is a terrorist state, which it is not. So the fact that Obama would sit down and negotiate with them only shows that Obama wants to use this thing called politics and communication. I know… what a stupid idea.
Next people go on to call him garbage. Well frankly, if you lack that much judgement and the ability to read people, you deserve what you are getting.
Thats right you lower class republicans keep voting for the same people who are taking your jobs raising your taxes and using the money gained to reap more profits.
I understand that people of your mentality see war as cool and manly, and while this appeases your blind hatred for all things different from you. At some point or another you are going to have to realize that we are all one race (human) and religion deep down is based on the same thing (seasons, and soltices)
Reaching out and learning about other coltures is the only way to stop violence against anyone.
Obama is the only hope I have left in America, the once great country.

Posted by: marcus | May 15, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Obama talks out of both sides of his mouth. Talk, attack, what is it? This guy really is clueless and the fact that he is my age makes me cringe. He has no clue what he is getting into. This is a very dangerous world. Bush has kept taxes reasonable and inflation, interest rates and unemployment low. My only problem with his presidency is that I think he needs to work on strengthening the U.S. dollar. McCain is addressing this issue. I will take his experience anyday over a far-left politician who would not have gotten even 5% of the vote if his skin color was paler. Jimmy Carter II.

Posted by: Obamination | May 15, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“It is almost humourous to think that Bush is trying to spin Obama as some weak-spined liberal…”
He is? I read his speech. He didn’t even mention Adlai, um, Obama. He just said that history has revealed the folly of negotiating with tyrants, which it inarguably has.
Obama’s reactionary hissy fit has filled in the blanks nicely, though…connected the dots, as it were.
Just to be safe, next time he pipes up, he should do so wearing pig tails and a tutu.

Posted by: Chris | May 15, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Regardless of the mistakes that President Bush made during his administration I would vote for him again.
I could never vote for Senator Obama.

Posted by: Will | May 15, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

“Christopher London wears a tinfoil hat” has apparently just learned how to click on the “Post” button.

Posted by: new skills every day | May 15, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Christopher London
You are the prime example of what rational thinking people despise about liberals…you get so caught up in your emotional attachment to an issue that you resort to name-calling and belittling others in an unsuccessful effort to make yourself look better. Watch where you step, son…there is a thin line between self-confidence and delusion, and most of you misinformed liberals end up on the delusion side because you lack the facts that are provided when you look into an issue with both eyes and mind open…
PS…liberals ARE the enemy of this country…

Posted by: SteveS | May 15, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

hello, bush always says this. obama’s so vain – he thinks it’s all about him. gee, that reminds me of a song.

Posted by: elaine | May 15, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

I love Dubya!! He’ll go down as one of our best presidents ever. Talk about someone who sticks to his convictions!! I love the guy, but am I the last one on Earth who does?

Posted by: Ed | May 15, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Why is obama so jumpy about this issue?? isn’t what he said he would do “talk without preconditions”? Whatever you think of Bush (I do disagree with him on a lot of things) but it has been almost 7 years since 9/11 and we’ve not been attacked and I do thank him for it. Barack Hussein Muhammad Obama will run this country into Muslims hand. He will be worst than Carter in “appeasing” our enemies.

Posted by: Aaron | May 15, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

If talking is appeasement then what is selling arms for hostages?

Posted by: ghostwriter | May 15, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Obama knows America is tired of Iraq so that is what he ran on. He did not vote for the Iraq invasion because he was’nt a senator yet. If the libs were for making everyone wear pink on nthursday that is what obama would be running for. GW called him on it and not by name but it hit a chord. It is kind of like the fox in the hen house, he spoke up and got caught. GW is smarter than you libs think, that is why he keeps beating you.

Posted by: billy bob | May 15, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

SteveS is gay
Posted by: SteveS is gay | May 15, 2008 5:49:06 PM
====
….not that there’s anything wrong with that. :)

Posted by: Jerry Seinfeld | May 15, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

I wonder if Barak’s past drug abuse damaged the part of this brain associated with reasoning.

Posted by: j | May 15, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Bush is trying to attach and make an association with hitler? Does he not know his own family ties?
After 60 years of inattention and even denial
by the U.S. media, newly-uncovered government documents in
The National Archives and Library of Congress reveal that
Prescott Bush, the grandfather of President George W. Bush,
served as a business partner of and U.S. banking operative
for the financial architect of the Nazi war machine from 1926
until 1942, when Congress took aggressive action against Bush
and his “enemy national” partners.
The documents also show that Bush and his colleagues, according
to reports from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, tried to
conceal their financial alliance with German industrialist Fritz
Thyssen, a steel and coal baron who, beginning in the mid-1920s,
personally funded Adolf Hitler’s rise to power by the subversion
of democratic principle and German law.

Posted by: aLLAMR18 | May 15, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Christopher London…allow me to enlighten you. Among the military, a clear majority, 63%, self-identify as a conservative. Liberals tend not to serve their country. They tend to worry about gay marriage, legalized meth, the spotted owl, higher taxes, ignorant lawsuits, and the rights of terrorist suspects. London…you are an idiot.

Posted by: Scott E. | May 15, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

I wonder if Barak’s past drug abuse damaged the part of this brain associated with reasoning.
Posted by: j | May 15, 2008 5:59:05 PM
They lobotomize the reasoning portion of the brain free-of-charge the minute you join the Democratic Party…

Posted by: SteveS | May 15, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Mitt hit it right on the head……”When a rock is thrown over the fence, the dog that gets hit barks”
Still think Bush was talking about the worst president ever elected, Jimmy Carter. Crappy govenor, worse president ever. And a wink and a nod to shameful Syria Pelosi. She makes me want to puke.

Posted by: brwillham | May 15, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Appeasing people? What the hell is going on? Hamas is fighting an aggressor in Israel. Hezebollah is fighting a de facto civil war and an agressive Israel and then there is Iran, if it is true they are behind a lot of the attacks on our troops, is only retaliating for us backing that Marxist group that attacks within their own borders. I mean these poor boogs are fighting for their own interests within their own borders and they are compared to the frigging Nazis? Hezebollah didn’t invade Israel, but fought them on their own turf. Damn, some people that don’t like what we have planned for them fight back and now they are terrorists akin to Hitler. That is basically all this is about!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Robert Bruce | May 15, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Appeasing people? What the hell is going on? Hamas is fighting an aggressor in Israel. Hezebollah is fighting a de facto civil war and an agressive Israel and then there is Iran, if it is true they are behind a lot of the attacks on our troops, is only retaliating for us backing that Marxist group that attacks within their own borders. I mean these poor boogs are fighting for their own interests within their own borders and they are compared to the frigging Nazis? Hezebollah didn’t invade Israel, but fought them on their own turf. Damn, some people that don’t like what we have planned for them fight back and now they are terrorists akin to Hitler. That is basically all this is about!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Robert Bruce | May 15, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

This is crazy. First off, he wasn’t talking to directly you, Obama. And he didn’t compare you to Nazi appeasers. He simple said that if you think discussing with terrorists is gonna work, then you’re crazy. Second, HE’S RIGHT! I’m sure we can sit down and talk with terrorist leaders and countries (by the way, Iran is a terrorist country because they protect them). Democrats can go talk all they want. Here’s how it’ll go…
Democrat: “Look, you’re wrong and you need to stop. And if you don’t stop… we’ll come back later to talk some more.”
Terrorist: “You know what, you’re right. We should stop blowing up innocent men, women, and children. We should stop torturing families while making the father watch his wife and children die, all just to teach him a lesson because he talked to a US soldier. We’re very sorry…. NOT! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH”
Bush may not make all the right decisions or say the smartest things all the time, but he stands up for what he believes in, and this is the smartest thing he’s said yet. The Dems are so mad because they know it’s true.

Posted by: jt | May 15, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Funny, America hasn’t been attacked since the US went into Iraq and Afganistan. Secondly, saying Iraq and Afganistan are blunders is not exactly correct. Things could have gone differently, yes, but President Bush at least did something as opposed going into a fetal position as the rest of congress and the gutless American people have done.
Think about it, America has been the first help and support the rest of the world in times of crisis, yet we cower and worry what France, Russia, Syria, Greenland, Canada think about us.
Rep Pelosi’s position of “leadership” is beneath the dignity of this country.
I didn’t realize Sen Obama was so thin skinned.
Time for Sen Biden to seek other employment.

Posted by: seth | May 15, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

If McCain is an American Hero, Obama is an Anti-American Villain. Cannot wait for Marvel Comics to come out with a new villain with millions of supporters. Obamatron and his Obamabots. They need to revive Captain America first though to battle this new evil.

Posted by: Doug | May 15, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

George Bush is absolutely correct on this one, and God bless him.
I hate the Big Government, spend-spend-spend Republicans, and GWB was at their helm, and for that I can’t forgive him. And his coziness with the Saudis is despicable.
But when it comes to dealing with Islamists, and his stance against appeasement, I agree with him 100%.
He will be remembered for having begun the transformation of the middle east. From despotism to liberty takes a long time, and a lot of hard work, but he started it.
At this point even Barack Hussein won’t be able to turn back the clock.

Posted by: James | May 15, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Yeah, right, Ms Pelosi. Dems can say ANYTHING AT ALL for 8 years, including “Bush is a liar”, “Bush is Hitler”, “Bush killed hundred of thousands of Iraqis”, etc, and yet somehow, it isn’t FAIR when Bush answers back, in even the most general terms.
How can you Dems live with yourselves? Even a casual observer can see that this protestation by Obama and Pelosi is bunk. “Don’t do to us what we have been doing to you!” is what it is saying. And you guys see nothing wrong with that? Dems go overseas (read: Kerry, Pelosi, Carter) and slam the President and his policies all they want, and there seems to be no concern for the dignity of THEIR offices, does there?

Posted by: oscar77 | May 15, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

The question to All,
How, When, and Where are WE going to stop the 1500 year-old streetgang JIHAD against the entire world?
NY,DC, Shenkesville, PA? AGAIN?

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

There is no problem here. Jimmy Carter solved the Palestinian problem years ago. He was awarded the Nobel Peace prize for it. He also dealt with the Iranian hardliners in 1979. ahmadinejad himself was one of the misguided people who was set straight by the sight of Jimmy Carter laying down.
I expect the same kind of diplomacy from President Jimmy Obama.

Posted by: Will | May 15, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Lots of guilty folks who are moaning that the President was talking about them. Even to the point that CNN an MSNBC are distorting the news. Matthews is having a heart attack on MSNBC. Course they are in the tank for Obama.

Posted by: homjett | May 15, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Bush is easily right on this one.
History lesson: Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler. I happen to like many things Obama says but terrorists will play the appeasement angle only long enough to further the philosophy of radical Islam. Obama means well and hasnt to endure the dilemmas of terrorism as a President. Idealism vs. reality, which will it be?

Posted by: sundog | May 15, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Right on, Will! Only a naive leftist utopia-dreaming liberal would consider negotiating with leaders whose sworn policy is to annihilate the West. What is there to gain by negotiating with lunatics?

Posted by: Chris | May 15, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

I think we should share our nukes with Syria and Iran…from a missile.

Posted by: Swami | May 15, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Tex Taylor your an idiot. The sad thing is that you and every liberal out truly believe that Bush has done more damage than any other terrorist! Which doesnt surprise me, Democrats have always been on the wrong side of History and evidently have continued on the same path. For example, we took the Appeasement approach in during the 1990′s with Mr. Slick Willy. As a result we got attacked by Terrorist 5 times under Clintons watch and not once did he take action. Fast forward to September 11th 2001, Bush had been in office for 6 months and we get attacked for the first and last time under his Presidency. Call it what you want Facts are a stubborn thing, Clinton + Appeasement = “5″ terroist attacks on American Soil, Bush+Peace through Strength= 0 attacks (9/11 was a result of Clintons failed appeasement policies)
Let me reinterate that everything bad for our country is Good for Democrats! A struggling economy, defeat in Iraq,this gives Democrates a platform to complain and uplift their worthless policies! Again everything bad for our country is great for Democrats!
Vote Republican

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

The Definition of Right Wing Patriotism
Whitewash Republican failure and then blamesjft that failure onto the Democrats when things the Republicans did wrong doesn’t work out.
Wear flag pin on lapel and then whip up hatred among the Arabs and then let our soldiers bear the brunt of that Arab hatred and die so that Bush can ext ol their sacrifice for our country.
Republicans question Democrats’ patriotism while only a handful of Republicans even served in the military and most of the rest dodged the draft through deferments while most of the Democrats were decorated war heroes. But now the Republicans have made themselves arbiters of who patriotic.
And on the home front
veto any needed reforms so that our country can go down the toilet and blame Democrats in congress for the roadblocking Republicans sustaining the vetoed bill and the president blames congress for reforms not getting passed.
Have the president veto any help for veterans while doing everything he can to whip up more and war and anger and Al Qaeda recruitment and then patiot bait
the democrats saying they’re terrorist sympathizers.
Put a flag in your yard, on your car antenna and on your lapel and then condemn
t he troops to ten more tours of duty until they come home in a coffin.And if they
do make it home mutilated or mentally incapavcitated, cut the funding for any help and veto any renewal of the GI Bill.Veto any help for average citizens so when they come home they won’t fina a job, their parents will be out of their house on the st reet, they’ll get shot in a drive by shooting
Put a contract out on .America and then bilk the taxpayer through War in Iraq contractors from Halliburton and KBR.

Posted by: hageehoggie | May 15, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

DEAR ERIC….After reading several of your posts, I see you’re nothing more than the typical Bush Basher—Long on wind, Short on facts—And your lack of the ability to listen is quite evident as you put words into McCain’s mouth that were never said…You are an embarrassment as an American, Sir…Oh yea…You’re a liberal.

Posted by: greg in oregon | May 15, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Again.
The question to All,
How, When, and Where are WE going to stop the 1500 year-old streetgang JIHAD against the entire world?
NY,DC, Shenkesville, PA? AGAIN?
Any Ideas out there?

Posted by: Bill | May 15, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

DEAR ERIC….After reading several of your posts, I see you’re nothing more than the typical Bush Basher—Long on wind, Short on facts—And your lack of the ability to listen is quite evident as you put words into McCain’s mouth that were never said…You are an embarrassment as an American, Sir…Oh yea…You’re a liberal.

Posted by: greg in oregon | May 15, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

“I understand that when you are running for office sometimes you think the world revolves around you. That is not always true and it is not true in this case,” Perino added,
Boy I like that woman! And hay Who-insane Obama Mama…..If the shoe fits…
I love it when liberals get their panties all tucked in….

Posted by: WhoSaine | May 15, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

It’s always interesting to throw a rock into the darkness untargeted, and then see who yells when they get hit. If Obama hadn’t yelped, I would simply have assumed that Bush was talking about Jimmy Carter. How funny!

Posted by: Beez | May 15, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

“I voted for Bush twice before and would happily do so again without thinking.”
Obviously you weren’t thinking the first two times either Tina.

Posted by: j5 | May 15, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

I am very confused. Can anyone help me? How did Obama believe this was directed to him?
There are so many appeasers out there. Could it be that either the media (Obama) wants to get some attention or is Obama trying to believe his name is so recognizable that he has an international recognition?
The former…………

Posted by: John | May 15, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Hey greg in oregon….You are right on track my man…….Keep the faith and the liberals on the run…

Posted by: WhoSane | May 15, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Read this excellent article below – You will know why WhoInsane started his winning streak in SC..
Maybe We Can’t
The black case for Obama-skepticism.
Cinque Henderson, The New Republic Published: Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Ninety percent of black Democrats support Barack Obama. So that might leave an observer wondering: What the hell is up with that other 10 percent? Are they stupid? Do they hate their own race? Do they not understand the historical import of the moment?
I can shed some insight on this demographic anomaly. In gatherings of black people, I’m invariably the only one for the Dragon Lady. I’ll do my best to explain how those of us in the ever-shrinking minority of a minority came to our position.
But, before going any further, let me fully disclose my predispositions. I disliked Obama almost instantly. I never believed the central premises of his autobiography or his campaign. He is fueled by precisely the same brand of personal ambition as Bill Clinton. But, where Clinton is damned as “Slick Willie,” Obama is hailed as a post-racial Messiah. Do I believe that Obama had this whole yes-we-can deal planned from age 16? No, I would respond. He began plotting it at age 22. This predisposition, of course, doesn’t help me in making the case against Obama, especially not with black people. But, believe me, there’s a strong case to be made that he isn’t such a virtuous mediator of race. And it’s this skepticism about Obama’s racial posturing that has led us, the 10 percent, into dissent.
Let’s begin with the locus classicus of Obama love, Andrew Sullivan’s encomium in The Atlantic. He writes:
Earlier this fall, I attended an Obama speech in Washington on tax policy that underwhelmed on delivery; his address was wooden, stilted, even tedious. It was only after I left the hotel that it occurred to me that I’d just been bored on tax policy by a national black leader.
This is presented as a confession, and Sullivan honestly admits his reaction is based on his stereotyping of blacks. Add to that another Obama supporter, Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri, calling Obama the first black politician to “come to the American people not as a victim but rather as a leader.” You hear this kind of talk all the time. Never mind the dignified glories of Booker T. Washington, Frederick Douglass, Martin Luther King Jr., Colin Powell, Kurt Schmoke, and others. We have arrived at the crux of the matter. So much of the educated white people’s love for Barack depends on educated white people’s complete ignorance of and distance from the rest of us. Barack is the black person they want the rest of us to be–half-white and loving, or “racially transcendent,” as the press loves to call him. And, since picking a candidate makes you allies with his other supporters, why would I want to be allies with educated whites whose glorification of Barack depends in large part on their implicit denigration of the rest of us?
But, once you stare past the radiant glow surrounding Obama and begin to study the exact reasons for his so-called racial transcendence, you can’t help but conclude that it is mostly hokum. Why do black people love Obama? In large part, it’s because of the dark-skinned woman on his arm. Black people (especially black women) are nuts for Michelle. Had Barack married a white woman, his candidacy would’ve never gotten off the ground with black people. And would whites really be so into him if he hadn’t had a white mother? Based on U.S. political history, you would have to conclude: not a chance. My suspicion is that people are ultimately comfortable with Obama because a member of his family looks like them–and, if you think about it, that’s not terribly transcendent.
It is Obama’s biography, we are told, that will govern his behavior. He was raised by a mother who supposedly didn’t see color, so he doesn’t see color. He was born into tolerance and multi-racial understanding, so he will practice tolerance and multi-racial understanding. Except, that is, when it’s not useful to him.
Which brings me to South Carolina, where I was born and raised. I was there before and during the primary. Recall the moment. Obama was gaining on Clinton–but had also just lost New Hampshire and Nevada. A loss in South Carolina, and he would have been done for.
It’s worth remembering that the majority of blacks still think O.J. Simpson is innocent. And, in times like these, when a black man is out front in the public eye, black people feel both proud and vulnerable and, as a result, scour the earth for evidence of racists plotting to bring him down, like an advance team ready to sound an alarm. Barack needed only a gesture, a quick sneer or nod in the direction of the Clintons’ hidden racism to avail himself of the twisted love that rescued O.J. and others like him and to smooth his path to victory, and, therefore, to salvage his candidacy. After Donna Brazile and James Clyburn started to cry racism, Barack was repeatedly asked his thoughts. He declined to answer, allowing the charge to grow for days (in sharp contrast to how he leapt to Joe Biden’s defense a month earlier). But, while he remained silent about the allegations of racism, he gave speeches across South Carolina that warned against being “hoodwinked” and “bamboozled” by the Clintons. His use of the phrase is resonant. It comes from a scene in Malcolm X, where Denzel Washington warns black people about the hidden evils of “the White Man” masquerading as a smiling politician: “Every election year, these politicians are sent up here to pacify us,” he says. “You’ve been hoodwinked. Bamboozled.”
By uttering this famous phrase, Obama told his black audience everything it needed to know. He was helping to convince blacks that the first two-term Democratic president in 50 years, a man referred to as the first black president, is in fact a secret racist. As soon as I heard that Obama had quoted from Malcolm X like this, I knew that Obama would win South Carolina by a massive margin.
I’m part of an Internet group of black people who yammer on about politics. You could extrapolate from polling data that I would be the lone Clinton supporter in the bunch. And, indeed, I am. A member of the group posted the following anecdote after Barack’s now famous race speech:
Last week, I was sitting in a lobby chatting with the woman next to me. All of a sudden, she grabbed my hand as if she realized at that moment that I was black. She asked, do you go to church? I responded in the affirmative. Then she asked, do you go to a black church? I said yes. She said, I’m so glad that I met you. I have been really wanting to discuss this with someone. Is it true what they are saying about what goes on in the black church? I smiled and we had a lovely chat about pastors, Obama, civil rights and all things colored. She looked so relieved and really wanted to understand.
This story broke my heart. As the son of a Baptist minister, I can attest that Wright is and was an extreme aberration from how the overwhelming majority of black Christians worship. In church, black people hear about Peter, Paul, Mary, and how to get into heaven. How to forgive. How to love. Not how to vote.
But here was Barack suggesting that Wright’s behavior was commonplace in black churches: “I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.” He generalized Wright’s ridiculousness to distract from his individual choice to worship under a buffoon for two decades. I have a cousin who attended Wright’s church for three weeks and then left, never to return. She had no interest in hearing his nonsense from the pulpit.
Barack obscured the true nature of black religious life because, to do otherwise, he would have had to answer the question, “Why are you a member of a church that is this racially divisive and such a sharp aberration to how the rest of black people worship?” When Barack beautifully suggested that the beliefs pronounced from the pulpit of Trinity in Chicago are not uncommon, he was feeding us garbage. But Barack needed to protect his reputation as a race-healer and unifier, so he told a lie about black religious life to help keep the glow of his own reputation alive. And now the evidence suggests that Barack didn’t, in the end, break with Wright over his outrageous racial claims, but over his suggestion that Barack is just a politician.
That so many people have a stake in ignoring these real concerns is troubling. At least the Hillary supporters I know seem to be aware of her more unsavory traits: that she carries a knife with her that she could pull out at any minute. Not so with Obama’s fans. It’s nearly impossible to get them to admit any wrong in him. Given the choice, I prefer to side with the group that knows their candidate can be a jerk, rather than the group that believes their candidate is Jesus.
Cinque Henderson is a TV writer, working on a book about Abraham Lincoln.

Posted by: WhoSane | May 15, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Has everyone forgotten that you have a Democratic congress? The gas prices and most of the troubles now are as much on them as on Bush. Have they accomplished one thing they said they would? Both Republicans and Democrats are to blame for destroying this country, maybe it’s time to start looking at other parties or alternatives? Or is that too big of a concept for everyone?
By the way, in American history, Iraq is one of the least expensive and least causality causing wars in our history. Many of our wars came at a much higher price, and a much steeper price tag. So get a grip on reality. If you want to know the whole story, listen to the latest podcast from “My history can beat up your politics” http://www.myhistorycanbeatupyourpolitics.com/battle3.mp3

Posted by: NutKase | May 15, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Barack Husein Obama’s Credentials
1.Complete lack of any legislative achievements
2.Blatantly Leftist voting record in the Senate
3.Friends with Louis Farrakhan
4.Friends with Mu‘ammar al-Qaḏḏāfī
5.Youthful Cocaine and drug use
6.Ted Kennedy’s supports me even though JFK started the Vietnam War and his brother Robert illegally wiretapped Martin Luther King, Jr. and Teddy killed a female employee with who he was having an extra marital affair and who was pregnant with his child.
7.I make people feel good
8.I’m the last days Messiah whom the Arabs are waiting for and I’ll relieve the white race of men of their racist guilt when they vote for me
9.President I along with Jimmy Carter will negotiate peace with all factions that Republicans call terrorists.
10. Israel will have to capitulate to all Arab demands
11.Lastly I continue to support Al Gore’s hoax of global warming

Posted by: Elisha | May 15, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

President Bush’s comment was obviously aimed at Peanuts Carter, however, the thin-skinned, self-conscious traitors that waggle on about “negotiating” with the devil, like OB, Pelosi, Biden, and the other appeasers, reflexively respond in knee-jerk fashion. They know they’re being talked about, even when they’re not identified. The term is “Paranoia” and the symptom is “liberal speak.” When the shoe fits…

Posted by: Mick | May 15, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Look how cowardly the liberal democrats are, FACTS fly in the face of their aims at appeasement and withdrawl, cut and run. NEVER has it worked, it has always failed, and created a MUCH more dangerous world. In 2001, after being left unchecked and appeased for nearly 10 years, terrorist planned , tested and executed the September 2001 attacks on the US of A. That is what liberal appeasement brings, it is irrefutable…just listen to the libs…cowards every one.

Posted by: tom | May 15, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

werty – ‘My post read: “Obama has shown the judgement needed to run this country. Gates agree. “We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage . . . and then sit down and talk with them,” Gates said. “If there is going to be a discussion, then they need something, too. We can’t go to a discussion and be completely the demander, with them not feeling that they need anything from us.” That reasoning may work with countries founded upon and operating under principles other than absolutism. But what leverage can you find or what inducements can you offer to a regime (such as Nazi Germany and militant religious extremists) when their only acceptable policy is the elimination of all viewpoints that do not completely align with theirs? Once again the there is an alarming trend in this country and world towards “peace for our time”.’ I can’t see how you can take that to mean that we should attempt to deal with certain factions through talking alone is beyond me. The “peace for out time” is a direct allusion to Chamberlain’s Munich concessions with Hitler to avoid an immediate armed confrontation and that only led to even more disastrous consequences later.

Posted by: Publius | May 15, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Momo -
I’m sure you feel much better now that you have called me “dumb”. That’s the kind of thing that does a lot to unite us. I’m really surprised that I’m smart enough to use a computer.
The world is a very dangerous place that is made somewhat manageable by the aggressive use of force. Are there many things that led up to WWII? Absolutely! Although with your assessment of me as a dumb person, I’m surprised you would recommend reading material.
Most of these problems began a very long time ago. There has been regional and ethnic animosity since the beginning of recorded history. Does that mean we shouldn’t try to be helpful? Not at all. But to assume that all people are alike is the height of naiveté.
If you will read my post, it doesn’t say anything about not talking to people. It says -NO NEGOTIATION – ever with people that have a stated purpose of doing harm to us and/or our way of life.

Posted by: Barry | May 15, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Bush nailed ya, Obama! Funny how you cower and backpedal whenever directly confronted. And you’re going to speak to countries like that, on our behalf? No thanks!
I’d sure like to see all this “judgement to run the country”, since he’s shown none of it as a Senator.
Remember what happens when you stick your head in the sand, with “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.” Your a*s is exposed.
President Bush spoke well and everyone knows he’s right. And he proved the point,”The flak is heaviest when you’re over the target.”

Posted by: Rocco | May 15, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Wow! The ignorance reflected on this board equals to the current status of the country. People are suggesting things like “McCain is right…we need more troops IMO”. Then grab a rifle and go over there. Simple. Obama-lama-ding-dong, Hitlery, and McAmnesty are all horrible choices for President. When will you clowns wake up to the reality that we all must share? Instead of insulting one another, spend the time researching what you’re speaking about. Pure ignorance in this thread! Ignorance abound! It’s sickening to me. If you as a citizen want socialism then you can personally have socialism, but you have to pay for it….not me. The government is supposed to do very little but has taken the role of nannie because many people today believe that we should be coddled from cradle to grave by the govt. Stop being a bunch of pussies and face the facts of life. Life isn’t fair, you will not always succeed, good doesn’t always triumph, youu cannot always achieve what you set your mind on/to…..life is a struggle and it’s meant to be that way…..because when everything is handed to you and taken care of for you….well, you turn into the majority of people posting in this thread. If you’re so scared of terrorists then build a bunker, learn to shoot a firearm, go over to their country and screw with them face your fear…do something besides sitting on the couch munching potato chips watching american idol and wondering in the back of your mind when your stimulus check will arrive. Educate your moronic asses as to what is actually happening to this country or we will all suffer the consequences. The dollar….if you have 10 apples and fifty people, it would be safe to assume that either the apples will be split among the 50 people or the 50 people will simply decide who gets the 10 apples…regardless of the outcome…the apples are sought after items which makes them valuable because the people are hungry or will become hungry eventually….now on the contrary if you have 50 apples and 50 people, then everyone has an apple and there’s no hunger so there’s no big deal and it would be hard, not impossible, to sell someone your apple if they already have one which means that the apples value is worth less because they are so abundant. So in regard to the dollar….WE HAVE TOO MANY FRICKIN” APPLES OUT THERE AND THEY ARE MARKED WITH THE PROMISARY THAT “WE THE PEOPLE” WILL MAKE GOOD ON THEIR VALUE. That’s as kindergarten as I can get and I hope that you get the meaning folks. When the FEDERAL RESERVE “bailed” out Bear Stearns they just added a crap load of apples to the mix which makes your money in your pocket and in the bank worth less. Get it? Wake up America….put down the remote….turn off the TELL-A-VISION and envision a country that ran on it’s founding principles….the constitution. Please?

Posted by: Shawn | May 15, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Look how cowardly the liberal democrats are, FACTS fly in the face of their aims at appeasement and withdrawl, cut and run. NEVER has it worked, it has always failed, and created a MUCH more dangerous world. In 2001, after being left unchecked and appeased for nearly 10 years, terrorist planned , tested and executed the September 2001 attacks on the US of A. That is what liberal appeasement brings, it is irrefutable…just listen to the libs…cowards every one.

Posted by: tom | May 15, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Look how cowardly the liberal democrats are, FACTS fly in the face of their aims at appeasement and withdrawl, cut and run. NEVER has it worked, it has always failed, and created a MUCH more dangerous world. In 2001, after being left unchecked and appeased for nearly 10 years, terrorist planned , tested and executed the September 2001 attacks on the US of A. That is what liberal appeasement brings, it is irrefutable…just listen to the libs…cowards every one.

Posted by: tom | May 15, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Damn…the brother is a bit sensitive about this…possibly a whole boat load of truth was just spilled….what a bonehead…meet with subhumans..give me a break…

Posted by: boozy | May 15, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

What is this? This Rush Limbaugh Shill Club on this comment blog? I’ve never seen so many right wingers so full of XXXX in my life. If you want to know who’s appeasing, what about the
Repub;oans appeasing mega corporatins while the rest of us lose our jobs and get put in the street. And Bush is pver appeasing the Saudis and is personal friends with the Bin Laden family and he’s now over in Israel appeasing Israeli Prime Minister Olmert who is under investigation for corruption. Bush appeases Alexander Putin and won’t stand up to him.
And why is talking to someone’s enemy called appeasing? Didn’t former presidents speak to enemies to end conflicts? What about Nixon with China? What about Reagan with Gorbachev, and what about Abraham Lincoln talking to the Confederates to end the civil war. You right wingers are such morons you don’t know any history, any facts; you just jump on some sloganeering fools rush to talk tough while you can’ t win a war using the most high tech military in the world (used to be anyway) against some bed-sheeted peasants living in rubble, They fought your hero Bush to a standstill with no technology. You’ve showed the world the US is a bunch of paper tigers because of your failures.
You people are all mouth, no knowledge, and no brains and it is YOU who are unpatriotic and helping the enemy.

Posted by: allen_osuno | May 15, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

you know if i had a nuclear missile i would launch it straight at all you neocons on this post. No negotiation with those who are DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY. Let me guess, those aren’t your kids getting slaughtered and maimed in Iraq are they?

Posted by: j5 | May 15, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Marcus, after Obama loses this election, can we depend on you to leave our “once great country”?
Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

Posted by: Dilbert | May 15, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Pity poor Jimmy Carter II.
This liberal America – hater is doomed to oblivion – like the cowardly peanut farmer he idolizes so!

Posted by: Neal | May 15, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Obama is a baby. He doesn’t know anything about foreign policy. The reason he is so upset about being called an appeaser is because it hits home. Bush was referring to Carter speaking with terroists, not Obama. However it hit so close to home with Obama, Biden, Durbin and Pelosi, that it was like shinning a light on cockroaches.

Posted by: Les | May 15, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Harvard educated huh? His ignorance is only surpassed by his arrogance. President Bush only said what has been proven over and over again throughout history and Obama thinks it’s a slam on him. It’s just amazing. People like Obama and for that matter Jimmy Carter have great intentions but their results are just allowing evil to continue and more people get killed.

Posted by: dakota | May 15, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Bush has completely lost the plot. He is president of the United States and should be looking to replresent the best interest if this country.

Posted by: joeforsure | May 15, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

“That is what liberal appeasement brings, it is irrefutable…just listen to the libs…cowards every one.”
Huh, that’s interesting Tom. My guess is that you are leisurely posting on these blogs because you are too big of a COWARD to fight in war that you and your buddies thought was a good idea. Ah conservatives… love sending people to kill and die for them from the convenience of their home computer. How I love to be called a coward by a bunch of chickenhawks, whose spines are as long as their manhood, which is to say pretty inconsequential.
Here’s a thought, if you’re so for the war, stop repeat posting on this blog and fight your stupid war! Until then put ruler away. No matter how many times you measure it, it isn’t going to get bigger than two inches!

Posted by: j5 | May 15, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

He was hoping that Iran would join us and become our 58th state.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Actually I have an A+ in AH and I go to Israel every summer to visit my great aunt and cousins, and as I said you won’t convince me to hate Muslims, I don’t plan on becoming narrowminded and bigoted.

Posted by: Hannah | May 15, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

The reason that Hamas and other organizations will negotiate with Obama better than any other president is because is not the status quo president.
Plus his nationality plays a big part in that.

Posted by: CaPIcorn2 | May 15, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Obama is blowing smoke, trying to hide his Wright-ness from the Jewish vote. We will NOT be seeing Obama in synagogue anytime soon. Bull is dripping out of his ears when he panders to Israel. History will remember Bush as the Churchill of our era. God bless America, Israel, and our Commander in Chief.

Posted by: Matt | May 15, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Obamabreaker what is your basis the McCain is better than Obama. Give me some facts. I also respect John McCain because he was a POW, but just because you served in the military does not mean you are the best leader. Michael Jordan was the best player that ever played basketball, but that does not mean he will be the best coach.

Posted by: CaPIcorn2 | May 15, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Bush’s comments somehow has not offended me as much as the DNC’s treatment of Hillary. I never believed that I would feel this way after all I had been so much against Bush and Cheney and the Irag war from the beginning. However, these days I seem to align with the Republicans more and more. Democrats seem so much like losers. Carter started the funding for the northern alliance in Afganistan against the Soviets. Now he is chatting with Hamas. Obama wants to chat with Hamas and Ahmedinejad. Carter thought he could chat with the Iranians during the Iranian crisis. All this is too much to swallow. The democrats seem to beat up on their own and coddle with the enemy. Bush does seem so much better more and more.

Posted by: Voter | May 15, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Bush’s comments somehow has not offended me as much as the DNC’s treatment of Hillary. I never believed that I would feel this way after all I had been so much against Bush and Cheney and the Irag war from the beginning. However, these days I seem to align with the Republicans more and more. Democrats seem so much like losers. Carter started the funding for the northern alliance in Afganistan against the Soviets. Now he is chatting with Hamas. Obama wants to chat with Hamas and Ahmedinejad. Carter thought he could chat with the Iranians during the Iranian crisis. All this is too much to swallow. The democrats seem to beat up on their own and coddle with the enemy. Bush does seem so much better more and more.

Posted by: Voter | May 15, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Bush’s comments somehow has not offended me as much as the DNC’s treatment of Hillary. I never believed that I would feel this way after all I had been so much against Bush and Cheney and the Irag war from the beginning. However, these days I seem to align with the Republicans more and more. Democrats seem so much like losers. Carter started the funding for the northern alliance in Afganistan against the Soviets. Now he is chatting with Hamas. Obama wants to chat with Hamas and Ahmedinejad. Carter thought he could chat with the Iranians during the Iranian crisis. All this is too much to swallow. The democrats seem to beat up on their own and coddle with the enemy. Bush does seem so much better more and more.

Posted by: Voter | May 15, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Bush’s comments somehow has not offended me as much as the DNC’s treatment of Hillary. I never believed that I would feel this way after all I had been so much against Bush and Cheney and the Irag war from the beginning. However, these days I seem to align with the Republicans more and more. Democrats seem so much like losers. Carter started the funding for the northern alliance in Afganistan against the Soviets. Now he is chatting with Hamas. Obama wants to chat with Hamas and Ahmedinejad. Carter thought he could chat with the Iranians during the Iranian crisis. All this is too much to swallow. The democrats seem to beat up on their own and coddle with the enemy. Bush does seem so much better more and more.

Posted by: Voter | May 15, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

I am Democrat. Don’t like Mr. Bush and have never voted for him. But in this case, he is right. Just look at and check out the background of those people who Obama has been associated with…it’s terrified me. I will not vote for Obama if Hillary gives up this race. I can’t wait to watch Mr. Feel Good Osama says farewell to his ignorant fans in November!

Posted by: Dallas voter | May 15, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Barack Obama and other reality-challenged Democrats sail down Denial River

. and where theyll stop, nobody knows.
Earlier today, I touched on the emerging controversy surrounding comments Bush made in a speech to members of the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israels statehood. As the story has gotte…

Posted by: Sister Toldjah | May 15, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

pattdags – You are on one helluva roll!! Dean, Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy and all of you other ignorant ultralefty do-nothing-but-tax-and-spenders need a swift kick out the door – NOW!! DNC YOU HAVE DESTROYED THIS PRIMARY AND YOUR PARTY WILL BE GONE AFTER NOVEMBER!!!

Posted by: fairsuperdelegates08 | May 15, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

If the comparison made by Bush is falsly true then the comparison of Bush to Hitler made by the former German minister is truly true.

Posted by: leche | May 15, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

If Obama is so quick to take issue with Bush’s words what about the harsh rhetoric from Wright? Does he speak from two sides of his mouth? What a fake! Unbelievable what the Democratic power players are doing to someone who would have accomplished so much more. If Hillary is not the nominee, I am definitely voting McCain. Cannot support a fake — this one is bigger than Bush!

Posted by: Voter | May 15, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Getting back to the original subject of this blog, as usual, Obama can take cheap shots and bad mouth anyone, but as soon as he even thinks that someone might be saying something against him, he whines like a child. He’s been throwing low blows at President Bush since the begining of this campaign while the President has remained largely silent about Obama’s questionable (at best) qualifications and his even more questionable loyalties. He better suck it up because if he wants to play in the big time this is only the beginning.
It’s amazing how the suppoosedly “highly educated” young people in this country can fall for this middle aged (Yes, he’s a baby boomer) do nothing who does nothing but say the word change (Change to what???)
It shows how low the educational standards have fallen for our “Young Educated” people that they can fall for Obama’s empty promises.

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Do any of you republicans actually know what appeasement is or understand the Chamberlin reference?
Appeasement is giving into your enemies. What Neville Chamberlain did in 1938 was give Hitler Czechoslovakia.
It was not the fact he was willing to engage in talks with Hitler, rather giving into his demands.
No democrat has advocated appeasement or suggest giving into terrorists. The only statements any of them have made is the need to TALK with Iran and Syria.
By the way, Neville Chamberlain was a conservative…
As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: “Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.” We have an obligation to call this what it is – the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”
The senator that Bush references is
William Borah, Republican of Idaho.

Posted by: Matt | May 15, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Bush is a fool – probably the most foolish president till date.
You can fight with your family member at home but not in the street.
When in a foreign land, a president does not present his domestic politics to a foreign parliament.
He should be ashamed of himself. He keeps losing his bearing on every issue.
He’s just fighting to remain relevant.
FOOL!!!!

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Since when is presenting domestic policy to a foregn parliament off limits. This practice has been carried on by many presidents to many of our allies over the years, as well as foreign heads of state addressing our congress.

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Strange how the president can deride a nominee for president – on television, abroad – and you say nothing!

Posted by: white mountain | May 15, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

bj =========
Domestic policy is not domestic politics.
You don’t fight your political opponents on the floor of a foreign parliament. It is a stupid thing to do.
You settle your political scores at home. Are you inviting them to help you?

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Where in the speech did President Bush name Obama??? This reference seems to be more pointed at a number of foolish liberals who think that you can rationalize with religious fanatics that are bent on our destruction.

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Geldo,
I’m not inviting anyone to help, but reasuring the govt of Israel, that at least for the present while Bush is in office, there will be no negotiation with terrorists by the US govt is not trying to settle a political score, it is making a point of our support for Israel.

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

FOOD FOR THOUGHT ============
OK, talking to our enemies is wrong.
Why is Bush negotiating with Kim Jong il of North Korea? Is he our friend?
Why did Bush strike a deal with Ghadafi of Libya? Did he not blow up Pan Am airliner over scotland, killing americans?
Why is Bush paying and negotiating with iraqi insurgents? Are they not supposed to be terrorists?
….etc, etc
Every president, republican and democrat has done that in the past.
Hypocrisy!!!!

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

The world has changed a lot. It is now harder to win wars.
In the past, you can easily overrun countries that don’t agree to your terms. Not anymore.
That’s why you have to talk more these days to solve problems without resorting to war.

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Geldo
Why is Bush negotiating with Kim Jong il of North Korea? Is he our friend?
Bush is part of multi-party talks with Kim Jong IL–Big difference
Why did Bush strike a deal with Ghadafi of Libya? Did he not blow up Pan Am airliner over scotland, killing americans?
Ghadafi has renounced terrorism– this is an opportunity
Why is Bush paying and negotiating with iraqi insurgents? Are they not supposed to be terrorists? –Would you like to win the war in Iraq, this negotiation is necessary
….etc, etc
The difference (the way I see it) is Obama says he wants to sit face to face with a pack of radical liars thinking he can persuade these people to change their ideas on the destruction of all things non-Islam. I find that immature and very dangerous.

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

One final thing that I find offensive about Obama is his playing up to African Americans as if he’s one of them. He’s half white, and either 1/4 or 1/8th black on his father’s side. He would more appropriately be called an Arab American, but that wouldn’t play as well for his campaign, now would it??

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

bj ==========
The problem is that we find it hard to be objective due to bias toward one candidate or another.
There is absolutely no difference between the examples I gave you and talking with Iran.
We are talking directly with North Korea as we speak, offering them incentives to stop their nuclear program. North Korea is even more dangerous than Iran. They already have nuclear weapon which they have poliferated to other countries. Iran do not have it yet.
Libya actually blew up an american jetliner killing americans. Iran has not directly attacked us.
So Bush has negotiated with countries with worse terror records than Iran.
Why not Iran. When Obama says that, he calls it appeasement.
Isn’t that hypocrisy? Leave your sentiment out of this.

Posted by: Geldo | May 15, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Chamberlain was a Conservative, funny so was Churchill.
Why are so many Dems upset, he didn’t mention anything about Barrack Hussein Obama! I think he was probably referring to Jimmy Carter’s recent meeting with Hamas leaders last week……no? Didn’t Bush specifically ask Carter not do it, he did. Are the Dems this self-conscious?

Posted by: Neil | May 15, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Gelda,
I think our differences are deeper than our bias on candidates.
My take on this.
North Korea has not tested a fully capable nuclear weapon. Their test was only partially successful, and the Chinese will reign them in if necessary.
I’m very much aware that Lybya blew up a plane full of Americans, I was booked on that flight coming home from the UK after a month long business trip in Ireland, but moved my schedule up a week, fortunately, or we wouldn’t be having this conversation. However, as I said Qudafi has renounced terrorism and agreed to work with the US to fight it.
I applaud this.
Iran has made one offer to the US, Israel, and everyone else. Accept Islam as our religion, or eventually we all die. How do you negotiate with that? That’s not hypocrisy, is it? I think it’s called reality.
By the way, I don’t believe either political party has a viable candidate
and think both the Dems and Republicans should start over.

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

A question for the stupid. How do you solve problems with people when you don’t talk to them?? Also, was Reagan naive for negotiating with the U.S.S.R.?? Was Kennedy wrong for talking to Cuba and Russia?? I got a better question, was Bush wrong for talking to Libya or maybe Saudi Arabia for most suicide bombers being their citizens?? All of you are hypocrites of the highest caliber, and Americans of the lowest caliber.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

The good thing is I love hearing you all cry like babies. Get on the bus or get rolled the f%^k over……..

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Patty, it sounds like you don’t know your history. Oh well you lost. Go cry me a river.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

One might listen to Obama more if he had very DONE ANYTHING. In sum he’s a skilled orator whose chief accomplishment has been filling minor lawsuits and incorporation papers. Certainly not qualified to be our President.
Comparisons to Kennedy are laughable – Yes JFK was 46, but he used influential contacts to get INTO the Navy, being awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Medal for his heroism commanding the PT-109, then served 6 years EACH in the House and Senate.

Posted by: Vanguard | May 15, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

The funny part is the same people who are saying Obama supporters are sexist etc, are the same people saying gutter comments about Obama or black people in general.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

To The Oracle
Have you ever heard of the concept that some things can’t be resolved through talking? Mixing Religion and Politics breeds fanaticism, and that’s what Iran is all about. You can’t reason with the President of Iran when he thinks he’s on a holy mission. The best hope is that he will be replaced with someone more moderate that can be dealt with. In the mean time we wait. This is the only viable option, because trying to deal with this fanatic gives him more credibility in his countrymans eyes.

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Eric, billybob, and basispro:
If this country wants to win the war, we have to get a democrat in there. WWI–Wilson (D) win, WWII–Truman (D) win, Korean War–Eisenhower (R) Loss, Vietnam War–Nixon/Ford(R) Loss, Iraq War–Bush (R) losing so far (more money and time spent than in WWII).
It’s clear–if you want to lose a war, vote Republican. If you want to win, vot for a Democrat.
You guys might want to read a history book. Republicans have NEVER won a war. You talk about Democrats starting war—Wasn’t it Germany who started WWI? Are you one of the blame America people for starting that one? Didn’t Japan bomb Pearl Harbor? Didn’t the Communists start Vietnam? Didn’t Saddam invade Kuwait? You guys are just plain stupid. It’s just like a Republican to blame America for starting wars. I suppose you believe the twin towers were bombed by Americans too?
The problem with Republicans is that they were too scared to fight when they were young—Bush, Cheney and all the rest of the cowards. They don’t know how to win a war. Democrats have WON every war they controlled as Commander in Chief and Republicans have LOST. I guess you may have a sliver of hope for your cause though. If a Democrat is elected this year, then we may still have a chance to win and not lose this war.

Posted by: TruBlu | May 15, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

To BJ: Then why do we talk to North Korea?? Do you think they’re going to become good by a regime change?? What about how we dealt with Russia?? It took them almost 50 yrs to crumble. So should we just act like they don’t exist??

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

I really think that alot of you are missing the point. The point isn’t whether we should talk to them or not. The point is when you act like you’re better than pewople they start to resent you. I’m not saying we can change Iran by talking to them. But, if we engage and let the world know that we HAVE ACTUALLY TRIED DIPLOMACY most of the world will back us up. That was the difference between Desert Storm, and iraqi freedom.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Eric, billybob, and basispro,
If this country wants to win the war, we have to get a democrat in there. WWI–Wilson (D) win, WWII–Truman (D) win, Korean War–Eisenhower (R) Loss, Vietnam War–Nixon/Ford(R) Loss, Iraq War–Bush (R) losing so far (more money and time spent than in WWII).
It’s clear–if you want to lose a war, vote Republican. If you want to win, vot for a Democrat.
Are you guys really that stupid? Read a history book once in a while or better yet talk to a fifth-grader.
I thought that Germany started WWI? Not America, brainless. Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, not America. The Communists invaded Korea and Vietnam. Saddam invaded Kuwait. You can blame America all you want, but facts are facts. I’m sick of you blame America folks.
Democrats have WON every war America has been in when they’ve been Commander in Chief and Republicans have LOST every war when they have been commander in chief. I like how you want to claim a tie for Korea, but in reality the Communists won and still control N. Korea. You can’t even argue a tie for Vietnam, which Nixon/Ford lost. Bush I had the chance to beat Saddam, but chickened out at the border. The only way we won’t lose this war is if a DEMOCRAT becomes Commander in Chief and shows them who’s boss.

Posted by: TruBlu | May 15, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Lol. Patty, I’m delusional?? An who is the one blaming all of HRC’s woes on blacks?? if you are not intelligent at least try to SOUND intelligent. Get over yourself, he beat her fair and square. Oh yeah and as far as the black comment?? You show your intelligence….Or lack thereof. AA’s only acct for 13% of the pop baby. so find another scapegoat. I even got another point for you. If you will vote for McCain over Obama, then you were never supporting HRC because of her policies. I say this because they are about 95% the same on policy. So that tells me you were either voting for her cuz she’s a woman, he’s black, she’s white, or she is Billy’s wife. But I’ll say this much. If you will vote against your best interests out of vindictiveness, So be it. You will have done more to prove you are “uneducated voters” than any political pundit or Candidate ever could….

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

to the Oracle: north Korea has it’s back against a wall. It can’t feed it’s people or even provide heating oil to keep them warm. There are also hopes by South Korea of reconciliation some day.
This puts Korea in a different light than Russia. We need to keep the pressure on Iran, and not give credibility to their president (sorry but I can never spell the fanatics name right) by having direct talks with him,
while pressuring Russia to push Iran into giving up their nuclear ambitions.
All for tonight. Good discussion even if we’re worlds apart.

Posted by: bj | May 15, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Lol. And reading some of these comments from the Obama haters, I’ve started to ask myself. Is this what the households in Rome sounded like right before she fell. You know they too thought they were untouchable. It seems some think just by being born a “white American” they are entitled to the world bowing at their feet and ideals.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Lol. I hear you BJ. I appreciated a substantive debate too. Have a good one.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Sure Osama Obama would meet with his muslim brothers, how else to plan the downfall of the U.S. When the shoe fits, wear it. He comes form avowed marxists and was, probably still is, a muslim. His “I have been a Christian for 20 years” just won’t cut it until he explains his first 25 years, including his education at muslim institutions. He might also explain how he got into Punahou in Hawaii, which is very expensive and exclusive and darned near inpossible to gain admission to. Those muslim neanderthals want to kill all infidels and only a total fool would take a chance on this purposely deceptive candidate, especially when his voting record and associations show him to be an extreme leftist and very probably a marxist. His deception is just following the dictates of the Qur’an, or Communist Manifesto. Leftists on this post simply hate the U.S. as is their mindset, and gravitate to anyone they see as a like-minded crusader. Osama Obama is your messiah, sort of like OBL is to the terrorists, but he is going to take you to yet another defeat.

Posted by: COWBOY | May 15, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Obama has now united half of the Dems and all of the Repubs against him. Oh the irony.

Posted by: Mack | May 15, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Instead of saying the President’s comments were “unfair”, Obama needs to “man up” and explain how he plans to solve problems in the middle east. Hopefully, UBL will never attack us again, but if he does saying it is unfair is unlikely to be a helpful response.

Posted by: Shoemaker | May 15, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

A PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. belittling Americans in a foreign country – with less than 20 % approval rating in the USA, George W, Bush does not know when he is being used by foreign government and people. This is Extreme Right Wing Politics in the USA. But then again, what does Native Americans know – the liberator George W. Bush, knows not his history! Sincerely, Lake Hart, a Native American Writer.

Posted by: Lake Hart - A Native American Writer | May 15, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Bush is hell bent on making it impossible for the next President to resolve any of the problems he is going to leave behind. He is trying his level best to get into an irrovacable agreement with Iraq, he wants to tie American hands with regards to Iran and he want to keep the stalemate going in Palestine. God help us – we can’t get rid of this President soon enough. I am strongly pro-Israel and a believer in the doctrine of negotiating from strength. Bush, however, has made both America and Israel less safe.
Any sane man can see that the biggest beneficiaries of Bush policies have been 1. Iran, 2. Pakistan, 3. North Korea, 4. Hamas, and 5. Al Qaida and to a large extent even Russia. Bush has been the greatest enemy of the geo-political interests of USA.

Posted by: Jim Saxon | May 15, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Lol. Okay patty, well I’ll say this. If you think there is really a POTUS test?? I got a bridge to sell you. As far as lying, I don’t hate HRC at all. But please. She is the Queen of pandering and lying. Remember when they asked her how did she explain her Husband making them a million dollars richer advocating the deal she SAYS she is against her retort was and I quote “How many angels can dance on a pinhead, I don’t know. Do you also forget about her saying on 3 diff occasions she dodged sniper fire?? Also guess who pardoned the ONLY 2 weatherman CONVICTED of bombings?? Ding Ding Ding, you guessed it. Bill Clinton!!!!!! Oh yea, and P.S., hey Harold Damon, wheres HRC’s flag pin?? How bout McCains?? wheres your flag pin as a matter of fact??

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

President Bush is 100% CORRECT. Whether he meant it towards Barack Obama or not ….no one knows.
But Barry is wrong on his stance on coddling terrorist states, in addition to his stance on just about EVERYTHING ELSE.

Posted by: Bill B | May 15, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Shoemaker,
This is not the Middle East or Europe.
This is “Turtle Island” – Know your history “Civilized Ones.”. Terrorism, Bullyism, Genocide, Slavery, and Exploitation is not exclusive to the “enemies of the USA.” We are still here aren’t we! Lake Hart, a Native American Writer.

Posted by: Lake Hart - A Native American Writer | May 15, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Patty, all of the Obama supporters feel the same way, just in reverse. So what makes you any better?? An if he’s such a nobody coming from nowhere then thats even worse than HRC. Because a junior senator toppled the biggest political machine of the last 25 yrs. The Repubs couldn’t even do that. Lol. An you say he’s a far left Liberal. Well 2 more questions ma’am:Who is proposing the socialist healthcare package?? Also, who said they would unequivically pull out of Iraq no matter what her ground commanders said?? Barack is even in the middle on Affirmative Action. What other Dem has said they want to revamp it into a CLASS system and not a race one?? Sounds like you are coming to the argument with “no substance” as you can only attack on ill-bred preconceived notions and flimsy associations when HRC’s connections take the cake. For GOD sakes the woman is on trial in the middle of her primary race.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Oh I know patty. I was talking too Harold. Sorry if I made you think that was addressed to you.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

the man the Dems would appease
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: Some people see only the external aspect of the enemy, and not its ulterior motives. The people who came to occupy Iraq – it seemed as if all they wanted was to take over the region and its oil. But when you peel off the outer layer, you see that their analysis is different. They have realized that something is about to happen in the region. The hand of God is about to emerge and eradicate the injustice in the world. They discuss this among themselves. Look how much attention they have given it. Some people believe the Hidden Imam is living his life somewhere, without any concern for the problems of humanity. If this were the case, there would be no existence at all. Everything would be in chaos. The Hidden Imam manages all the affairs of the world.

Posted by: holly | May 15, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Lol. I won’t argue obvious ignorant trivialties with you. The proof is there. Just look up a U.S. census and you will see. So how did he win Kansas?? Colorado?? Wisconsin?? Missouri?? Vermont?? Since you think you know everything why don’t you tell me what the AA pop is in those states. An FYI, the reason he is gaining so much is num 1, like it or not he has more supporters. 2nd, his supporters give 5, 25, 50 at a time, and they do it CONSISTENTLY HRC’s supporters are huge donors who in the miscalculation that she would win by Super Tues gave the most theey could, which is $2300. Once again, HRC’s fault. But I understand why you feel this way. See, most HRC supporters seem to do what their told. Thats why alot of them believe in this ridiculous gas tax pander. But most Obama supporters actually go online and check behind the rhetoric. Try using your computer more for research and less for spewing hate attacks and you might enlighten yourself. Oh yea. I’ll leave something else with you. Bill wion the Presidency in 1992 with 86% of the black vote, 68% of the latino vote, and 39% of the white vote. I guess you had no problem with us voting in force then huh??

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Bush could have found a better way to put it but what he said is true. You can peacefully negociate with some people. Sometimes “aggressive negotiation” is necessary.

Posted by: Royce | May 15, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Yea, but you choose peaceful negotiation 1st. Before you send Americans off to fight in a foreign land.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

what has obama accomplished other than?
Obama’s Luggage
Three Pound Universe
2008-05-15 09:01:00
Barack Obama certainly has a lot of baggage to carry on his journey to 1600 Pennslyvania Avenue.”Presidential hopeful Barack Obama has an indicted, Syrian-born Chicago shyster named Tony Rezko for a financial mentor. He has a screwball, race-baiting, America-hating pastor named Jeremiah Wright for a spiritual mentor. He has an unrepentant domestic terrorist named William Ayers for a political mentor. And he has one of the angriest wives ever to aspire to the position of First Lady.”Is Obama Smarter Than a Fifth Grader’

Posted by: air | May 15, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Lol. I don’t know air. But you’re sure not.

Posted by: The Oracle | May 15, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Just take a look what George Bush has done to this country and the world; it should be clear how much this man knows about the modern world history.

Posted by: Jame Liy | May 15, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Yes Oracle peaceful negotiations should be tried first. Aggressive negotiations however can only be countered with an aggressive response. Some people have known negotiation styles and will not likely vary from them. In other words, once someone hits you, you hit back. Some people understand nothing else.

Posted by: Royce | May 16, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Is it better to use diplomacy first or to fight a preemptive war with flawed intelligence and drain national funds? Is it better to go after a country with no known ties to Al Qaeda or to maintain at all costs diplomatic ties to a country that harbors a majority of them? (Saudi Arabia). I’m unsure where you Obama-haters are coming from, but I find your ra-ra attitude towards meaningless wars to be troubling at best

Posted by: Tom F. | May 16, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Go ahead and tow that neocon line, Mr. McCain. Your @ss is going to be toast.

Posted by: Patriot | May 16, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Eagle1 :
what drugs were YoU using in those years?
Clinton Recession?
The only recession I remember during Clinton’s presidential years was the Euphora after those huge lunches!
That was a period of prosperity. Clinton left filled the coffer of our treasury with more money than it had ever held…
Taxes were low, paychecks were dependable…… don’t diss Bill!
And don’t expect much if you’re just going to switch one BOzo with another BOzo!
Don’t miss the chance in a lifetime to elect a President who’s brilliant, can speak intelligently without benefit of telprompter, and comes equipped her own solutions!
Hillary outshines Bozo in every way except one….. but you can’t blame her for not being black!

Posted by: questioner | May 16, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Dear Barack Obama: The World Does Not Revolve Around You!

OBAMA IN ORBIT!<span st…

Posted by: The Pink Flamingo | May 16, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

samy:
“Even your president or the candidates, weigh their words when it comes to Israel. It is a chronic infection to the US mindset. Help Israel defend itself but dont let US politics be only about Israel. ”
Where do you come from?

Posted by: questioner | May 16, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

I wonder how amany of the bloggers are paid by the republican committee to continue the lies the republican have propogated or are they stupid to believe the drivel they spout.
Obama was never endorsed by hamas. Find me the endorsement if you say they have.
Obama has never said he would meet with terrorists. Show me the statement if you claim its true.
I think the republican bloggers do not know what appeasment is, so far they have not used it correctly.

Posted by: The Lord of War | May 16, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Tom F.| May 16, 2008 12:18:48 AM — we did use diplomacy first, for many, many years, including throughout the a Democrat administration. As you know, it didn’t work because Sadaam Hussein had an evil agenda for Iraqi hegemony in the region, an agenda that he was actively pursuing throughout. In fact, since the 1970s, he had actively sought long-range missle delivery systems, and never gave up that pursuit, in spite of express conditions to the contrary that he agreed to at the end of the Gulf War.
Here is one such comment from the Duelfer Report:
“ISG assesses that these plans demonstrate Saddam’s continuing
desire—up to the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)—for a long-range delivery capability.”
And, he had two utterly ruthless sons ready to follow after him to carry on (and likely expand on) his designs for the Middle East, designs that were entirely inconsistent with any reasonable measure of stability and which also involved the development and ability to deliver weapons of mass distruction.
The failure to find large stores of weapons does not negate the conclusion of EVERY responsible expert, including the Deulfer Report, that Hussein had every intention of reviving his programs regarding weapons of mass destruction at the first opportunity.
Also contrary to your insistence, Iraq did indeed have known and active ties to several terror organizations prior to our incursion. In fact, al Zarqawi, the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, went back into Iraq sometime during 2002, well before we passed the Congressional resolution, or undertook the incursion.
In other words, your comments are just plain dead flat wrong.

Posted by: Trochilus | May 16, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

it boils down to this, do you think bush, & GOP has helped our country, or just HELPED THEMSELVES? – choose wisely, you voted for bush TWICE – don’t make the same Mistake Mctwice…

Posted by: TRUTH-B-TOLD | May 16, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Oh, I forgot to include this little tidbit, also from the Deulfer Report, concerning Hussein’s long range intentions for those illegal long range missles.
“Given Iraq’s investments in technology and infrastructure improvements, an effective procurement network,
skilled scientists, and designs already on the books for longer range missiles, ISG assesses that Saddam clearly intended to reconstitute long-range delivery systems and that the systems potentially were for WMD.”
There’s more, in case you would like to post some more ridiculous nonsense about Iraq and Saddam Hussein.

Posted by: Trochilus | May 16, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Exclusive Video: McCain Was For Talking To Hamas Before He Was Against It…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/15/exclusive-video-mccain-wa_n_102031.html
What an hypocrite McCain is…
Loosing his bearings…

Posted by: JohnS | May 16, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Turns out that the GOP folks do not know what Appeasement means. Bush doesn’t know what he is talking about.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/15/hardball-shoutfest-matthe_n_102020.html
Judging a tree by its fruit, BUSH is the worst president ever.
Worst foreign policy ever.
Higest national debt ever ($ 9trillions)

Posted by: JohnS | May 16, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Bush & McCain think they are Winston Churchills but are really more like French General Maurice Gamelin. Gamelin fought the Germans in Belgium so he wouldn’t have to fight them in France. The Germans gave him the old “sickle cut” by going thru Luxembourg and behind the BEF and the French “strategic reserve”. The only thing left for the French to do was to head to Dunkirk.
Bush & McCain fight Al Quedia by attacking countries that have nothing to do with Al Quedia, but happen to sit on top of a lot of oil. Meanwhile, countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia harbor Al Quedia, but they are our “allies”. After getting his clock cleaned by Mannstein and Guderian, Gamelin blamed the French left for his defeat. Meanwhile his right wing buddies fell back to Vichy and asked Hitler “how high” he wanted them to jump.

Posted by: James Knell | May 16, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Yes, liberals believe in joyful tidings like “peace in our time” until they push the world into world wars, just as Carter and his NSA guru, Brzezinski, believed in Khomeini and Khomeinism for Iran (as opposed to its 2500 legacy of monarchy which had kept Iran united, generally peaceful and secular and out of trouble-making with and in Islamist/terrorist spheres and YES, even moderate and progressive [before all you leftist jump in, mind your "liberal relativism" pretensions - Iran WAS living its Golden Era considering its neighbors, and compared to what came before the Pahlavi’s and what became of it after Khomeinist/Carterism!]) Thus they foolishly backstabbed Iran, the king and government, and made “critical engagements” and “constructive dialogue” with Khomeini in his new Parisian headquarters, calling that devil incarnate “a saint” and “Gandhi like” and “of impeccable honesty and integrity”!!!….until the snake bit back the hand that had fed him and took American hostages and set Iran and the world on a path which has brought US ALL to where we are today grappling with the ramification of another menace brought about by leftists’ twisted logic.
So what has the world been doing for the past thirty years? Hasn’t the world ignored and forgotten the mullahs and Iran — until after 9/11 — and whitewashed their crimes, and appeased them for thirty years as they entrenched their rule and systematically rolled back Iran to the twelfth Century and raised a new generation of Iranians more malleable to its ideology of hate and terrorism, — remember the Clinton apologies, remember calls of “reformer” mullahs, remember European illicit trade and lucrative deal-making under the guise of “constructive dialogue” and engagements, and remember all the on and off, secret and not-so-secret, meetings between US and mullahs all throughout the past 30 years? So what of it all???
And here again another liberal candidate with the typical liberal ego issues and an apparent chip on the shoulder more menacing than perhaps even Carter’s, continuously perceiving hurts and injuries all over this country, bringing joyful tidings and “audacity of hope”, urging change, even “revolutionary” change, and “yes, we can”…. Yes, we can what??? We can invade Pakistan, our ally, and we can make nice with the mullahcracy, the terrorist enemies of everyone, Iran included!
Alas, alas, alas, the audacity of arrogance.

Posted by: mahabad | May 16, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

To:
The Lord of War | May 16, 2008 1:01:11 AM (the second of two identical posts).
You have said:
“Obama was never endorsed by hamas. Find me the endorsement if you say they have.”
Okay. Here it is — Powerline actually posted the audio of the interview in which they made that comment.
You can actually listen to it! Neat, huh?
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/04/020315.php
Secondly, you say that Obama never said he would meet with terrorists. No one else said that either — only you.
What Obama very foolishly said was that he would meet with people like the “leader” if Iran without any preconditions. You can find that comment on his website.
Any further questions?

Posted by: Trochilus | May 16, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Bush & McCain think they are Winston Churchills but are really more like French General Maurice Gamelin. Gamelin fought the Germans in Belgium so he wouldn’t have to fight them in France. The Germans gave him the old “sickle cut” by going thru Luxembourg and behind the BEF and the French “strategic reserve”. The only thing left for the French to do was to head to Dunkirk.
Bush & McCain fight Al Quedia by attacking countries that have nothing to do with Al Quedia, but happen to sit on top of a lot of oil. Meanwhile, countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia harbor Al Quedia, but they are our “allies”. After getting his clock cleaned by Mannstein and Guderian, Gamelin blamed the French left for his defeat. Meanwhile his right wing buddies fell back to Vichy and asked Hitler “how high” he wanted them to jump.

Posted by: James Knell | May 16, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Gee, why didn’t Obama just agree with Bush that appeasement isn’t an historically successful thing? Then he could’ve been a winner, not a weiner! Bush never said “Carter”, “Obama” or “Democrat”, but the guilt is profound in the Democrats and Obama that they’d quip so loudly. “Thy lady doth protest” they sure jumped the gun, whoa! I guess they admit to being Neville Chamberlains afterall!

Posted by: marcus | May 16, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Gee, why didn’t Obama just agree with Bush that appeasement isn’t an historically successful thing? Then he could’ve been a winner, not a weiner! Bush never said “Carter”, “Obama” or “Democrat”, but the guilt is profound in the Democrats and Obama that they’d quip so loudly. “Thy lady doth protest” they sure jumped the gun, whoa! I guess they admit to being Neville Chamberlains afterall!

Posted by: marcus | May 16, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Inquiring minds want to know, was Monica a swallower or a spiter?

Posted by: cameltoe | May 16, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Pres. Bush specifically said the words “No Senator should…” so about whom do you think he was talking? Of course it was an international slam on Obama and a way to put Obama and the holocaust on the minds of voting American Jews. I, for one, am not falling for that. His words fall on deaf ears to me because of his lack of intelligence, character, morality, and inhumanity.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 16, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

Let be clear here. The interest of America come first before Israel. who ever think differently change your citizenship….

Posted by: leche | May 16, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

Not all Jewish people are Zionists. I like the idea of having a country where Jewish people “belong”. But, I feel I belong here, in America. I wouldn’t feel comfortable in Israel. But, I don’t like that people hate the Jews and hate Israel, and I didn’t like that Bush makes like he’s the Burning Bush with God speaking our of his mouth. It was nauseating to hear what he said. Someone REALLY should have impeached him long, long ago.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 16, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am

In view of President George Bush’s attack on Senator Barack Obama in Israel, I wish to suggest a new English word in his memory and honour: ‘Bushit’, which means, ‘a presidential loose talk, especially on foreign soil’.

Posted by: Kwaku Antwi-Boasiako, London | May 16, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am

Hold on, I have heard of supporting your political party, but self preservation is human nature. Are you happy with the current status of the economy , the ongoing war, weakening of foreign respect,immigration? If not then you are cult followers without the natural ability for selfpreservation if you cast a vote for someone or something that doesn’t give what is expected.

Posted by: Angel | May 16, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

What GW should have said!
Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do it? You Hillary? You Osama Obama? I have more responsibility here than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Saddam, and you curse Carl Rove. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That water-boarding terrorists, while tragic, probably saved lives. And that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. I know deep down in places you don’t talk about at parties and body-piercing gatherings, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a bunch of limped-wristed tree-huggers who rise and sleep under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, and then question the manner in which I provide it. I prefer you said THANK YOU, and went on your delusional kumbaya singing ways, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post. Either way, I don’t give a damn what you think! You friggin’ people. You have no idea how to defend a nation. All you did is weaken a country today, that’s all you did. You put people’s lives in danger. Sweet dreams, son.

Posted by: Fred Smith | May 16, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Obama calling white women “sweetie”. Never heard him call Michelle that.

Posted by: livegap | May 16, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

huffingtonpost = tripe

Posted by: Mack | May 16, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Trochilulis So that is what passes for an endorsement in republican speak. a representative of the government says he likes a candidate. If so that means mccain has endorsed Clinton, huckabee, biden, dodd and others for president. I am glad you cleared this up in such patronizing terms. Perhaps you should try the truth for once.
YOu are calling the elected president of iran a terrorist. Your candidate does not say he is a terrorist but a state supporter of terrorism. I know that is hard for your little mind to follow, but try.
So show me where he is going to talk to terrorists. May I remind you, that calling a person a terrorist does not make him a terrorist.

Posted by: The Lord of War | May 16, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

VOTE MACCAIN OR WE ALL BE IN TROUBLE!

Posted by: DAVE | May 16, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

The thing is, Obama is apealing to terrorist, doesn’t mean Dem. party is appealing to terorrist. Obama should not represent Dem. party, he is not qualified.
I’m seeing Dem. party failure if Obama is the nominee!
The Dem. party made the bitter wine, they will drink it by themselves.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | May 16, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

“beneath the dignity of the office of the president”. That statement describes this administration and all of their actions perfectly. The Bush Administration is a disgrace to America.

Posted by: Tom G | May 16, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Jim: with a southern accent, racist mind, and blinded eyes:
Ignorance is Bliss.
You are an idiot.

Posted by: Noemi in CA | May 16, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

This sure seems to have hit a sore point the way the Dems are reacting, or should I say acting. Could it be they’re afraid it’s just what the majority of the American public believe them to be, appeasers, willing to say and do anything to gain the power of the Oval office, just as they already have in the Congress. Which since they’ve had it, has been doing a real bang up job for the country. The extremists leading Syria, Iran, et al will eat little Obama alive.
What’s he going to do, ask them to sit down and sing Kumbiyah?

Posted by: Chacmool2 | May 16, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Way to not have a mind of your own, people. Just because you read other peoples’ rants doesn’t mean you have to make them your own.
Shooting down things you don’t even understand is unbelievably immature, I suggest understanding other peoples’ points of view before pushing your own on them.

Posted by: Tenpa | May 16, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

The appeasement remark may only fool those who do not know history. The truth is that the Hitler’s plans may have never materialized if Britain and France were willing to enforce the Treaty of Versailles. Instead, their leaders tried to push the restored German military machine onto a collision course with the Soviet Union, hoping that those two nations would annihilate each other. As long as German armies marched east, the governments in London and Paris considered their policies working just fine. Even after Germany invaded Poland in September 1939, which triggered the declaration of war by Britain and France, neither of them was really committed to fight in support of their ally. That phase of World War II became known as the Phoney War.
Actually, the United States can hardly pretend of being squeaky clean in that respect. There is enough evidence that the US were helping, if not encouraging Saddam Hussein to take advantage of the post-revolution chaos in Iran…

Posted by: aquilon | May 17, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Obama is paranoid. Pres. Bush could have been speaking about many Dems; ie; Pelosi, Carter,etc.
Obama’s rhetoric, Michelle’s obvious separationist views and the anti-America (white) garbage she wrote in her senior thesis at Princton lead me to believe that she and her husband would be the worst things that could happen to the U.S. God help us if he gets elected.

Posted by: Paola | May 17, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

A lot of you people are complete idiots. Do your homework. The last 8 years of Bush, you have convinced, duped by lies, yet you still vote for the same nonsense. Get a clue and get off the glue! If the last 8 years of corruption, fighting a war in a place we should have not been, bankrupting our economy have not taught you a thing, there is no hope for you. We need to come with a new approach. First despite what you may feel, every Arab is not a terriost, its racist and idiotic, second words before guns does not make you weak, but can be the smarter and greater strength. I’m not saying when it’s time to rock, don’t but only when neccessary. As far as protection, we need to focus hear at home. I’ve served my nation and know, and have seen what war does, so preach to someone else.

Posted by: Aron | May 17, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Where is Osama Bin Laden and what did Iraq have to do with 9/11 again?
Now about those wiretaps…

Posted by: Love2Read | September 2, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.