By Jennifer Parker

May 12, 2008 12:28pm

Obama’s Inability to Hire Good Help Rears Its Head … Again

We started covering Sen. Barack Obama’s inability to hire good staffers in June 2007, when he blamed staffers for some opposition research trying to link Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, to outsourcing in India; for injecting some venom in the David Geffen/Hillary Clinton fight; and for missing an event with firefighters in New Hampshire.

In December, we noted again that Obama was blaming the answers on a 1996 questionnaire on a staffer; and was blaming his touring with "cured" ex-gay gospel singer Donnie McClurkin (which antagonized gays and lesbians) on bad vetting by his staff.

Those five buck-passing incidents were apparently not enough.

Yesterday, in an interesting New York Times look at Obama’s rise in Chicago politics, we learned that in 2004 some Jewish supporters became alarmed to learn that in a questionnaire Obama refrained from denouncing Yasir Arafat, or from expressing strong support for Israel’s security fence.

Reports the Times: "In an e-mail message, Mr. Obama blamed a staff member for the oversight, and expressed the hope that ‘none of this has raised any questions on your part regarding my fundamental commitment to Israel’s security.’"

In January, during MSNBC’s presidential debate in Las Vegas, Obama was asked about a document put together by one of his South Carolina staffers that listed comments made by the Clinton campaign that some perceived to be attempting to stoke racial fires. "In hindsight, do you regret pushing this story?” asked Tim Russert.

"Our supporters, our staff get overzealous," Obama said. "They start saying things that I would not say, and it is my responsibility to make sure that we’re setting a clear tone in our campaign.”

In February in a meeting with the Chicago Tribune, Obama was asked about an earmark that went to the University of Chicago while his wife Michelle Obama worked there.

"I don’t think that I was obligated to recuse myself from anything related to the university," Obama said, adding, "when it comes to earmarks because of those concerns, it’s probably something that should have been passed on to [U.S. Sen.] Dick Durbin, and I think probably something that slipped through the cracks. It did not come through us, through me or Michelle, and Michelle has been very careful about staying separate and apart from any government work. But you could make a good argument that this is something that slipped through our cracks, through our screening system.” 

In a March 2008 interview with the Chicago Sun-Times to answer questions about Tony Rezko, Obama was asked about the fact that Obama had told the newspaper in November 2006 that he had never been asked to do anything to advance Rezko’s business interests. But the Sun-Times had subsequently learned about a October 28, 1998 letter Obama wrote to city and state housing officials on behalf of a housing project for seniors that Rezko was working on.

The letter, Obama said, "was essentially a form letter of the sort that I did all time. And that I wasn’t, by the way, aware of.”

A reporter asked: You weren’t aware that he was associated with the project?

Responded Obama: "I wasn’t even aware that we wrote the letter. The answer that I gave at the time was accurate as far as I knew…This was one of many form letters, or letters of recommendation we would send out constantly for all sorts of projects. And my understanding is that our letter was just one of many. And I wasn’t a decision maker in any of this process.”

The Sun-Times also pointed out that in November 2006 Obama estimated that Rezko had raised somewhere between $50,000 and $60,000 for him during his political career.

But since that answer, Obama has given back almost $160,000 in Rezko-related contributions.

"The original estimate was based on, I asked my staff to find what monies they attributed to Rezko, and this was the figure given to me," Obama said.

So, for those keeping track at home, that’s ten instances of Obama publicly blaming his staff for various screw-ups.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10!

(You of course could also add Austan Goolsbee, Samantha Power, Gordon Fischer, and retired Gen. Tony McPeak.)

That would be 14. We will continue to keep track.

And for the record, yet again, let me state that I find Sen. Obama’s staff unfailingly competent and polite, courteous and efficient, and I once again express my regret that Sen. Obama does apparently not feel the same way.

- jpt

User Comments

Gosh, Jake, now that it’s pretty much too late, you’re posting something critical of Obama? How about reporting things when it matters?

Posted by: Charlene Whitney | May 12, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Thank you, Jake! This raises one of my biggest concerns about Obama. He apparently (wink*wink*) knows little of what is going on under his very nose, whether it’s from the pews of his church or his Illinois and U.S. Senate offices. He never accepts blame, does he? It’s become well known that he talks out of both sides of his mouth. I’m convinced that the people have no idea what they’re voting for when they cast a vote for Obama.
And I believe the October Surprise awaiting Obama concerns Israel and the Middle East.

Posted by: HoosierSue | May 12, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Obama is brilliant. He always votes absent and blames his staffers for things, so he never gets in trouble. He’s also got the underhanded-comment thing down pat. McCain ‘loses his bearings’ and Clinton ‘periodically goes batty.’ Obama is what the Democrats need right now to win the WH — an egotistical brat who knows how to stick it to others.

Posted by: DM | May 12, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Don’t forget to look at Michelle Obama’s HUGE raise she got from University of Chicago before they got that earmark. Funny how Mr. Hope isn’t quite as “clean” as he portrays himself to be. He lined his own pockets and then took taxpayer $$$$$$$ to repay the favor. Chicago politics at it’s worst. He’s a fraud.

Posted by: Vickie | May 12, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Gee Jake; A little too late now!!! Why didn’t you get more detailed on his lies, when it really matter.
Too late for Hillary now!!
Obama is already picking out his vice-president and it ain’t Hillary Clinton.
I’m sick of Obama and the media’s love for him.
I’m go over the the “REAL” side to vote.

Posted by: stella | May 12, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Blaming
Is the bases of Obama’s campaign.
Obama has blamed everything and anything on someone or something else through his entire campaign.
Obama would be struck by lighting if he ever owned up to something himself. Failed to blame anyone or something for all the problems in his life, campaign, the country or the government and the world.
Mr Obama has played the Blame game continuous and disgustingly low enough to continue playing it.

Posted by: seah | May 12, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I guess I would say… at the least… he didn’t marry one of those people or have them as his campaign chair right?

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Maybe it was a staffer who told Obama there were 57 states?
Maybe it was a staffer who neglected to tell him Rezko was under federal investigation at the time of their land deal?
Maybe it was a staffer who told him to join Rev. Wright’s church?
Maybe it was a staffer who told him bitter small town Americans cling to religion and guns?
Maybe a staffer will also be responsible for his landslide loss in WV tomorrow?

Posted by: ch | May 12, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

and we are talking about staff that was predominantly hired out of a small local area right.
as opposed to from a national platform right?
predominantly like Hillary and McCain…they both were national officials who hired their personnel right?
seems to me there has been atleast half of those “blames” from both of their campaigns too… just during this election.
so not sure why this story is better than theirs.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

OH, superdelegates, where are you? Head stuck in the sand. Better get it out before it’s toooooo late.

Posted by: char19145 | May 12, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

I read the article you’re referencing and it was a hatchet job. The corporate media are going to do everything they can to avoid an Obama presidency. If there’s anyone with something to lose from CHANGE, it’s the powers that be. McCain, on the other hand, will continue to get his free ride.

Posted by: Dema | May 12, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

DL – The person Hillary Clinton married created 22 million jobs, balanced the budget, created a budget surplus, raised the minimum wage,ended ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, passed Family/Medical Leave, won 2 terms as President and left office with the highest approval rating of any president of our lifetime.
You’re maybe not too bright?

Posted by: ch | May 12, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

He will be a pass the buck president. Sad choice we have Obama or Mccain.

Posted by: Tina from Florida | May 12, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Obama is a pro when passing the buck. It’s never his fault. Of course, this was glaringly on display when he turned his association and misrepresentations of Rev. Wright into a marvelous treatise on the problem of race relations in America. Like Bush, Obama does not like to be held accountable.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 12, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

jack
This is what MSM did in 2000 to bush and look what we got. We are going to have one more idiot media pushed. God knows. may be it is time for the greatest nation on this planet to start fall.
you should have done this long time ago.
I will never call you and MSM people as Journalist. We should call you as talk show hosts.

Posted by: Tony | May 12, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

The media kept Hillary from being President. Tim Russet, Keith Oldreman.
Chris Matthews. All black raido stations. Obama will not be President.

Posted by: Jstern | May 12, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Charlene – My thoughts exactly! Looks like the media are starting to get a little nervous at the thought of being caught on the other side of ‘the national people’s choice candidate’ issue. Obama was never vetted as other caidates are and now it is starting to show up.
We can only hope that it’s not too late. W. Virginian’s will speak tomorrow!

Posted by: SM | May 12, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

This is exactly what the MSM did in the run up to the Iraq war. Instead of doing some investigating, all they did was beat the war drums.

Posted by: Mack | May 12, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

I hope you give this some coverage.
I dont care how late it is. I just think this is a pattern that the people deserve to know about. I think this is a worthy news story. It talks about his style of governing and honestly about his truthfulness.

Posted by: Joan | May 12, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

How many times has Hillary done this? Sen McCain? You list 10 instances but there is nothing to compare to…

Posted by: matt | May 12, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

How many times has Hillary done this? Sen McCain? You list 10 instances but there is nothing to compare to…

Posted by: matt | May 12, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

It seems Senator Obama is basing much of his campaign on his judgment. How good was his judgment in hiring all of these incompetent staffers. And please, don’t blame his senior staff. That would just be more of the same.

Posted by: Buford Gooch | May 12, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

It just proved again and again: Obama and his backers are just the same OLD politicians!!!!
So please annoint yourself as any “new” politics or “change”…
He is no better than others, or worse because he pretended he is “clean”…

Posted by: True Truth | May 12, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

You idiots are missing the point of the whole story. It’s not that mistakes are made, it’s Obama’s position to NEVER take blame or responsibility. Good gracious. Just look at Indiana. He was supposed to win big and he barely pulled even (and that’s with his buddy fudging the results in GARY). Yet, how does he explain it away. IT’S RUSH LIMBAUGHS fault. Waa, Waa!

Posted by: Purvis | May 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Assuming Obama can get Hillary to quit (by paying her off, as he is reportedly considering) and assuming he can beat Old Man McCain in November (which is questionable), he will also have a hard time finding qualified people to serve under him if he becomes President. America will be in for four years of disastrous “leadership”, and a lot of experienced, career politicians will run like the wind away from Washington, D.C.

Posted by: Rhys | May 12, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

What a great article! For the first time in a long time people are starting to add up all the flaws and show that this “perfect man” who wants change in Washington is no different than who he says he is better than! I mean what kind of person blames their staff for every mistake that they make- if I was on his staff I would quit. When will he take accountability for his actions?!!! I want someone to hold accountable for making our country better, like he promises he will, and I don’t think blaming your staff is very mature or respectable! Just goes to show that people really don’t know this man and that Clinton is the best choice for any real change that doesn’t mean changing whose turn it is to blame when things go wrong!

Posted by: A | May 12, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Yes, here’s the guy that’s going to be “Right on Day One” — as long as his staffers don’t mess things up.

Posted by: cappamore | May 12, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Obama supporters can’t imagine there is anything wrong with him so they try to deflect attention by blaming Clinton, McCain, Jennifer Parker, the squeegee guy… They learned that game straight from the top.

Posted by: DM | May 12, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

So where’s the change? It appears to be politics as usual. The audacity to lie and not be called on it.

Posted by: Mack | May 12, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Don’t shoot the messenger. Your candidate is a proven liar. Get over it.

Posted by: Mack | May 12, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Marika: Way to wake UP! The media is owned by many corporations whose goal is to make money. When a candidate brings in ratings, positive articles are written. Why do you think Obama has gotten such a free pass? P.S. Just so you’re informed FOX news is owned by Rupert Murdoch and is quite republican centered.

Posted by: LLL | May 12, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

The only bad part about this article is that it was written so late in the game! In addition to these great points there is also the fact that he voted present in the majority of his Senate votes and he based his campaign credentials on a decision that he had no say in and no repercussions for his decision. If he is just going to put the blame on other people, than what is it that he will responsible for?!! People wake up to the truth and realize that he won’t do anything for anyone because he can’t be held accountable for his actions!

Posted by: A | May 12, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Purvis
waa waa
when did either of the other two candidates take any blame… I recall Obama calling himself a bonehead…that it was his fault…that he should have phrased things better…that he is an imperfect messenger…
seems the other two blame everything on everybody else…
Clinton “It was George Bush that was to blame for her vote” “it’s the media picking on me” “it’s the vast right wing conspiracy”
I am sorry I missed the words…”I was wrong” out of Clinton’s mouth…and George W.’s…
in fact she hasn’t said “I made a mistake”
…even with her hiring.
If we have learned what a mistake it is to vote for someone who doesn’t admit a mistake until they are dragged to it kicking and screaming…
then we have not been paying attention for 8 years.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Purvis,
Glad to see I’m not the only one who
sees Obama as a big bawling baby.

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | May 12, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

In our lives, most of us have met people whom we like right from the first handshake. But then, as we get to know them better, we discover we have very little in common, or the person is not one whom we would choose as a friend. Barack Hussein Obama is one such person; the more we learn about him, the more we wish to distance ourselves from him, no matter how “nice” he seemed at first. And the old adage is still correct: We ARE judged by the company we keep!

Posted by: Rhys | May 12, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

dl: I may have phrased it wrong– keep me laughing. The only thing he’s sorry about concerning his comments about bitter, clinging, bigoted middle class Americans is that someone actually recorded it. I didn’t mean it that way, waa, waa. I didn’t know how the voting machine worked and pushed the wrong button. I didn’t mean to vote that way. My aide filled the form in for me.For mister I have superior judgment, he’s right, he done make many boneheaded mistakes.

Posted by: Purvis | May 12, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

What can voters expect from someone so inexperienced with such a flimsy record. Gaffes like this would matter less had Obama run with a more substantive record.
Also, someone needs to acquaint him with Harry Truman’s truism “The Buck stops here!”

Posted by: s. valenti | May 12, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

But these really are more detail problems – it is quite plausible to miss these, particularly when you don’t have a big or experienced staff to begin with (state-level politics). They don’t even come close to the magnitude of things like hiring Mark Penn, with all of his lobbying entanglements, which should have been patently obvious. I think its important to keep a sense of perspective as to problems that may fly below the radar screen vs. major affiliations..

Posted by: elcee | May 12, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

This is a pattern we can expect to see time and time again.
We have EIGHT years of absolutely NO INFORMATION on Obama while he was in the State Senate because his daily schedule, personal papers and other important documents either got thrown away or put in storage, according to Obama.
I’m sure that is a staffer’s fault too.
It sounds more like the destruction of evidence to me. But, then again, I’m not buying into his bogus platform.
How convenient. Now, we’ll have to

Posted by: sherr | May 12, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Who would be the better president?
Obama or O. J. Simpson?

Posted by: T | May 12, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

I am sure the McCain staffers are onto this list and have at least 20 to 25 in tow.
The GE is going to be a blood bath and the Dem’s will lose with this weak, bumbling inexperienced, empty headed , mumbling, stuttering, inept, phony!
The SD are useless, they are being told to tow the party line or else. They too are having OBAMA shoved down their throats!

Posted by: HP Boston | May 12, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Jack Tapper:
This is over looking for crumbs on Obama again?

Posted by: Lookup | May 12, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Imagine if Hillary Clinton had done/said these things. Patterns would have been drawn and this narrative would have been constantly repeated.

Posted by: Joan | May 12, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

…or Obama has a better track record for cleaning up his camp when folks go off message… but you go on interpreting message control and effective campaing management as a bad thing, JT.

Posted by: fontapa | May 12, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

With staffers like these, Obama will be well on his way to lose 57 states, not including Alaska or Hawaii.

Posted by: Steve Z | May 12, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Barack and Roll:
Nice list! Hee, Hee! Which bills did he actually sponsor or write. Was he writing them while he missed 57% of the vote.

Posted by: Dules | May 12, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

You left out Robert Malley and his secret meetings with Hamas which Obama claims he knew nothing about. That should be enough to have him leave the race. Obama has a well established pattern of not knowing and disowning friends and employees, who seem to be highly expendable. Probably many Americans are thinking that Obama thinks our country is expendable if it benefits Obama. This is not racism, this is following Obama’s pattern of dropped associates…

Posted by: calli | May 12, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Oh let’s not forget that Obama thinks the great lakes are in Oregon. Makes you wonder how much time he’s actually spent in IL since one of those great lakes is right there:-)

Posted by: Clay | May 12, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Barack and Roll
All those bills were really done by someone else and EMIL JONES PLACED OBAMA’s name on them.
ASK ANYONE IN CHICAGO POLITICS.
This will be coming out about Obama soon as well.
Google Obama’s relationship to EMIL JONES

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 12, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Next time someone asks you “where’s the beef” in Senator Obama’s Senate record, please feel free to send the link to this diary.
Posted by: Barack and Roll | May 12, 2008 1:56:16 PM
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL……………Can’t bamboozle ME!
Ya right 143 days as a senator and Barry only learned how to pass the buck.

Posted by: HP Boston | May 12, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

B&R…How quaint of you.
I’ve already looked over the information you supplied.
What I’m looking for is the same level of information demanded of Obama that was of Hillary Clinton, for her daily schedule of meetings, projects, etc., while she was First Lady.
I’d like to see the equivalent expected from Mr. Obama. But, of course, for whatever reason, that information cannot be located.
Why is that?
My guess is there would be information that would raise eye brows, and further reinforce that Obama is not an agent of change.

Posted by: sherr | May 12, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Posted by: HP Boston
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL……………Can’t bamboozle ME!
Ya right 143 days as a senator and Barry only learned how to pass the buck.
***************************************
Ha! Ha! Ha!Ha! Ha! Ha!Ha! Ha! Ha!It’s obviously not the first or last time you’ve bamboozled!

Posted by: Barack and Roll | May 12, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

This was interesting reading until the last paragraph.
It seems that otherwise competent reporters, once given a blog or a TV gig, feel the need to be “edgy” or “cool” or prove that they’re onto the scam. So we get Tapper or Schuster or Andrea Mitchell or Nora O’donnell sniffing out their contempt for the candidates. At first I thought they just couldn’t abide Clinton, but now I see that adolescent sarcasms have become stock in trade. Morrow, Reston, Apple and most of the big shots from years gone by simply let their stories do the work – that is the definition of professionalism and self-confidence.

Posted by: modp | May 12, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

EMIL JONES
Is Obama’s Political GODFATHER
Obama didn’t do anything in the State Senate.
EMIL JONES and Obama made a pack.
Emil Jones is part of Obama’s earmarks.
And there is more to come if he wins.

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 12, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Rhys
Are you kidding?

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Questions: How many McCainites have quit over their lobbying connections to bad actors? And didn’t McCain blame staffers for the fact that his wife’s old “family recipes” were actually ripped off from the Food Network?
It is, in fact, the job of staffers to vet people with whom the candidate might not be completely familiar, so some of these errors might actually be staffers faults. But for Cindy McCain to pass off recipes as hers when the millionaire heiress and beauty queen has most likely never broken an eggshell herself is just plain lying.

Posted by: nitpicker | May 12, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

So Barack has the penultimate desk in the buck distribution list. If he actually took responsibility, he would still be a community organizer.
That’s Chicago politics plain and simple.
On to August…

Posted by: len | May 12, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

So I am supposed to be impressed that my senator, Obama, has been involved in 570 bills? Tom Coburn, also a junior senator, was elected in the same year I believe and he has been involved in 565 bills for the same time frame. Wow, Obama is sure impressive! 5 more!
Barack and Roll, try to be realistic in your adoration

Posted by: silly rabbit | May 12, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

What has Obama accomplished? Can any of his supporters point to an actual bipartisan bill that Obama has written (all by himself) and passed? Hillary has an excellent bipartisan record, and McCain certainly has his name on a bill with (ugh) Kennedy. Obama is “pass the buckobama”, he’s like the buddhas that see nothing, hear nothing, speak nothing, maybe it’s because Obama’s not there, he really is an empty suit.

Posted by: frisco girl | May 12, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

I’m still waiting for Barack to fire Michelle over her put-down of America.

Posted by: DM | May 12, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Emil Jones will be the next person Obama will throw under the bus if it leaks out how closely they worked to scam the State Senate.

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 12, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Scoreboard:
Magic number is 2025
Obama: 1868 delegates, states and territories won 32 lost 16 (lost no Territories) need 134 for nomination
Clinton: 1699 delegates, states won 16 lost 32, Territories none
Campaign money raising
Obama’s campaign’s war chest with $55m and counting
Clinton’s campaign’s (25m) in the red and counting

Posted by: lookup | May 12, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Anybody can co-Spenser a bill. One doesn’t even have to know what it’s about. Just say yes when the roll is called.
That’s an accomplishment?

Posted by: T | May 12, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Barack and Roll :
take your list to fact:check and
watch it as it shimmies down into
an insignificant puddle of pellets.
B O sent out a list similar to yours… and fact:check compared it to Clinton’s senatorial accomplishments.
B O’s activities in this regard were rated almost as significant as a flea on an elephant.
I’ll be delighted when my little vote combines with all the other little votes for Hillary to win the nomination.
It might take a while… but victory will be hers.!….and ours. $^)

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | May 12, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I will say again
“I voted to give George Bush authority to go to war because he told me too”
“I didn’t get the healthcare bill passed because it was behind closed doors and you all did not see the republicans came after us but that won’t happen this time…but be clear I didn’t make a mistake last time…but I will learn this time” huh?
“I had nothing to do with Mark Penn”
“You know not to quote Saturday night Live but perhaps the media wants to offer Barack a pillow”
“I didn’t say I supported licenses”
“Peter Paul is a crook I did not take bad money from him…I don’t care if the election commision fined me”
“I didn’t support NAFTA. Ignore what I said in public back in the 90′s”
“It is a great right wing conspiracy”
and one more time
I was islead but was not wrong on the vote for the war”
There is one person who passes the buck more than any other in this election.
and I am sure you can recognize who made the above statements.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

It just show that …
Obama is a puppet and somebody is always pulling his strings for him. Even his web page was written by ghost-writers. I doubt he’s even read it!

Posted by: T | May 12, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Fact:
Dems’ primaries:
Obama won 10 “black” states and 6 ‘red” states
Hillary won 17 states (most of blue bases)
Dems’ caususes:
Obama won 13 caucuses
Hillary won 1
Apparently Obama dominated caucuses but Hillary won more primaries..
The fact is the fact..

Posted by: True Truth | May 12, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

true truth
Your candidate can only win if you keep bringing up race.
The civil war is done…we’d like to move on.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

This is over the course of a year? Ten mess-ups in a campaign of such enormity seems remarkably small.
Especially when compared to the Clinton and McCain camps. By far.

Posted by: Howard B. | May 12, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

dl,
I only talked about the fact…
People will make their own judgment on the fact!!

Posted by: True Truth | May 12, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

true truth…or selective truth as the case may be
you could say similar things using age and sex….
like I said some of us don’t want to use racist sexist ageist issues as a topic that overrides the war …the economy…the inability for congress to help the american people since Newt gingrich forced a balanced the budget and helped get rid of our debt (which even I am not a fan I am less of a fan of other people who try to take credit for it)…
the inability for healthcare revisions to take place for the past 15 years…
the insiders in washington for years who have done one thing and now that they are running are trying to say they do another.
but yuo keep throwing out those statistics about race…or gender …or age…or religion…or whatever helps your candidate not have to deal with people were liking Obama’s message and plan better than hers until the kitchen was thrown.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Krissy K -
You’re attacking Obama on guns? And you’re supporting Clinton? Hillary Clinton?
Sorry, gotta clean up the coffe that just shot out my nose…

Posted by: fontapa | May 12, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

and speaking of hiring Jake
can we get a list of MCain’s “hires” on his campaign staff…and how many are lobbyists.
and who is the guy that is his big foreign policy advisor that headed the committee to remove saddam hussein for years …a committee that McCain and Lieberman sat on together.
…and what is he doing still being McCain’s chief foreign policy advisor after he campaigned for years to remove saddam hussein and go to war.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Jake, too bad Hillary Clinton did not use actually punts Obama takes when he blames his staff for an oversight or a different position.
He seems positively Clintonesque by dodging the actual issue. He is waffling on the direct inquiry and does not take responsibility for the punt.
Maybe Clinton could have used this line of attack on Obama in the primary. He says one thing but did another. But I guess with the Bosnia sniper fire she didn’t have the credibility to make the charge.
I wonder if McCain or the GOP has the credibility to make that charge in the GE.
Whether or not I’m Obama supporter, I’d rather know the true facts on these things than not before he gets into the White House. What are the odds he didn’t know what a staffer knew about these 10 separate items.

Posted by: Genna | May 12, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

George Soros is the Puppet Master and Obama is his moving lips.
He deflects all negativity off on Hillary and her surrogates but never ever takes blame for anything.

Posted by: George Soros | May 12, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

anyone suprised by this just hasn’t been paying attention. barack’s entire m.o. is the blame game. ANY criticism of him is painted as ‘old politics’ and probably because of ‘racism’ .. although he’s not the ‘race candidate’..oh heavens no, you bigot ! sheesh. you can’t point to anything in his record because he DOESN’T HAVE ONE..
and if anything should turn up, it must have been those darn staffers’ fault again. this is the guy we want as chief executive ?!?

Posted by: el polacko | May 12, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

You are all forgetting that Sen. Obama has superior judgment.
Now move along with your lives, citizens – nothing to see here.

Posted by: Adam Hadem | May 12, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Playing the BLAME GAME is nothing new for Obama. I keep wondering who he is blaming for being a member of the Trinty Church (HATE MONGERING AND RACIST)and having Bill Ayers sponsor his political coming out party. Then there is the fact that he required Rezko to pay $625,000 for a vacant lot so he could move in to a mansion for at least $200,000 cost less than value. Yes, the blame game is his best campaign strategy. And he does it so well. America needs a President who accepts responsibility for his actions and choices.

Posted by: Mary | May 12, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Knowing little of him at the start of the campaign I am resigned to a Jimmy Carter whose political skills match the economic mismanagement of deficit and inflation that has now plagued this country almost consistently since 1968. And we think we are today a strong country!

Posted by: carmelo | May 12, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Jake
somebody needs to do a story on Randy Scheunmann…McCain’s foreign policy aide in this election…and the ex-head of the committee that mcCain “honorarily” co-chired with Lieberman in 2002…
The Committee for Liberation of Iraq.
What is this thing and who is this guy that is heading “scheunmann” who headed the thing who is not McCain’s right hand foreign policy guy?
Why have we not heard about this? at all.
Is it becasue of this long drawn out stupid democratic primary…meanwhile the guy on the other side has one of the main architects of the idea of the war heading his foreign policy wing?
and America does not know this I am positive. and does not know about him hiring this guy as his chief foreign policy guy…or about this “committee” with all these right wing nut jobs who wanted the war…that McCain and Liebermann CHAIRED!
OPlease someone start asking the right questions.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

dl,
It is very interesting people are trying to talk about Obama’s message and plans, any hope again…
I think every voters have known the message from Obama: Change, yes we can!
The issue is: change from what to what?? Obama said change from old to new..
Of course, whoever is elected will be a change: the name of US presidnet will be changed, will be new one…
OK, change to new politics, Obama is outsider of Washington politics, poeple blame old, dirty Washington politcs, he is outsider and he will bring new and fresh air to Washington DC..
Yes, he is outsider of Washington Politics, but he is from Chicago – the one of the dirtest political city with the biggest political fixing scandal in the history… So he will bring the dirty of Chicago politics to clean up another dirty of Washington? It is not mentioning he is backed by the same “dirty” Old Washington insiders..
So what kind of new politics and ne change will he bring to Washington?
Regarding his plans to issues: he has no proven records he can solve the issues facing our country yet?
He has no concrete plan how to resolve War in Iraq except repeating his old anti-war speech..
He claimed against NAFTA but his advisor told it was just campaign language
His overall economy plan will be potentially huge tax increase and governemnt and no one believe his can solve national debts we have (BTW, he has no proven records he can solve any economic crisis)…
His healthcare plan is still under debate (again no proven record)..
So what is his value except he can make some young vote jump…

Posted by: True Truth | May 12, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

This committee for the liberation of Iraq that mcCain and Lieberman chaired….existed still way back in 2002! Right with this war.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Ouch!

Posted by: Big Bog | May 12, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

For anyone who thinks “Yes, We Can” and change need only look at the Deval Project in MASS and see what an Obama presidency will look like.
Yes We Can….write a book for millions and have our state get progressively worse as the days go by.

Posted by: Concerned in MASS | May 12, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Thanks Jake for posting this – and yes, I wish it had been sooner.
In the end, Obama supporters don’t want the press to report on anything negative about their candidate as if it’s some affront for the press to do its job. Any neutral position, slight pro-Hillary or any piece that does a good, fair and balanced investigative job on Obama is marginalized. Is this the kind of censorship that’s only going to get worse if Obama ever makes it as the (illegimate) President?
This is one more reason why any sort of Obama administration would be scary? the control of the press is unprecendented, so kudos for your bravery Jake.

Posted by: laughalot | May 12, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

“For anyone who thinks “Yes, We Can” and change need only look at the Deval Project in MASS and see what an Obama presidency will look like.”
I’m not following you, here. What does the project you’re talking about have to do with Obama?
Please elaborate

Posted by: fontapa | May 12, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Deval = Obama
Cut from the same cookie cutter
BECAUSE
Axelrod created both of them
Deval was a test run. Ran on the same theme and slogan
HOPE and CHANGE
Even had SAME SPEECHES…. Remember the “Just words”
Both has thin Resumes, both have good Speech Reading Skills, Both Created by Axelrod.
Don’t forget the Christian Killer ODINGA RAILA, Obama’s Uncle in Kenya–
He’s running for office as well— HIS SLOGAN IS ———> you guess it
CHANGE

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 12, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Wait a second, the University of Chicago is one of the top universities in the country; it’s not famous because Michelle Obama is working there (now if it were a small toy company that Michelle’s uncle founded that would have been a different matter). The point is that the best Midwestern University could use some financial support regardless of who is employed by it (and it must have a lot of people on its staff).

Posted by: alindra | May 12, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

True truth…
let me answer each point…
you say
“Yes, he is outsider of Washington Politics, but he is from Chicago – the one of the dirtest political city with the biggest political fixing scandal in the history… So he will bring the dirty of Chicago politics to clean up another dirty of Washington? It is not mentioning he is backed by the same “dirty” Old Washington insiders..”
He has found his way through local tough and dirty politics…but Obama is backed by more “small” people than dirty insiders than either of the two other candidates… by a vast difference…until recently that is almost all he was backed by. He has one questionable donor whose name we have heard ad nauseum… How many times has the press brought up Peter Paul who Hillary was fined enormously for taking money from and how she raised money. Not to mention the tons of others …did you know a large portion of the 20 multimillonaire people on that threatening letter to Pelosi stayed in the Lincoln Bedroom when Bill was President?
“So what kind of new politics and ne change will he bring to Washington?”
a lot. He already has. how many scandal questions were raised in this primary. The Clintons have lists. That is not me throwing dirt…that is a fact and everyone said that they would be raised during this election. Obama has never raised those scandals. Besides one reference to Wal Mart in response to a tear at his character. I saw him in NH …as Isaw the other two candidates…I was one of those backling Clinton until Isaw (in small intimate settings) that a couple of candidates were yucky pols (Romney and Clintonwere the slick old time car sales feel)… Obama, McCain, Biden, Dodd were all about facts and answering questions …not downwardly but straight forward back and forth. No royalty…no fake smile…no spin. Uplifting but not spin. and I wish everyone got to see those…this would have been done a long time if every citizen had to sit in a room with each candidate and watch them answer questions.
“Regarding his plans to issues: he has no proven records he can solve the issues facing our country yet?”
His plans make sense… he understands that people who are choosing rent or food over healthcare are not the people who have an accountant and can figure out a stipend with a tax cuut…and he knows that it is about cost before we can get to universal healthcare… the cost problems we have will be overwhelmingly exascerbated by universal coverage… (lack of family physicians, nurse, surgeons, billing red tape, and out of control lawsuits and malpractice insurance getting passed on to consumers…only gets worse with a larger population and the a bureaucratic system installed like medicare…anybody who tells you differently…is trying to get your votes…and/or is out of touch with the real problem…or is taking advice from the insurance companies.
“He has no concrete plan how to resolve War in Iraq except repeating his old anti-war speech..”
Our first problem is the people of our ally countries have to support our country. The leaders of those countries are influenced by their peoples…we need support from the region and our allies to get out. The night of the election one candidate will cause celebrations around the world… and his last name begins with O.
“He claimed against NAFTA but his advisor told it was just campaign language”
he made a mistake …and admitted it… he fired the guy. he should not have said his advisor was not meeting before he found out that he did. But he fired the guy. People’s strongest cases against Barack are by other people’s statements…listen to what he says and then watch his actions.
“His overall economy plan will be potentially huge tax increase and governemnt and no one believe his can solve national debts we have (BTW, he has no proven records he can solve any economic crisis)…”
Obama is not the one throwing out “fake plans” hello gas tax! Listen to what he says…like I said about the healthcare issue…and anyone who compares his economics to McCain’s (or lack there of combined with the war having no end in sight)… that is a joke.
Cl;inton and Obama’s economic plans are very similar but where they differ he is correct…she is not.
“His healthcare plan is still under debate (again no proven record)..”
Hillary and McCain …do ahave a proven record…she didn’t want to back the s-chip initially…and she failed behind closed doors and with a large budget and time to focus on it… when she tried before.
and it does not address the issues that are the problem…
on top of the fact that in today’s economy…what she is planning absolutely posistively can not get passed. She is promising something for votes…and that has been the problem for 15 years.
any other questions.
I know this stuff because I am a political junkie who went to every political engagement (dem and repub) I could when they were all here in my state for the past year and a half (nh)…
I moved here just to be around it… back when I was a Clinton supporter. Then I woke up the Clinton’s aren’t the bar.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Interesting headline. Why wasn’t a previous post entitled “McCain’s inability to hire people unconnected to lobbying for corporations or overseas military juntas rears its ugly head again?”

Posted by: Ricky | May 12, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Carpenter -
Pretty thin, man. Gonna be hard to sell that theory. Better call your Republican handlers and ask for better material.
Sounds like six degrees of Obama.
“Well Adolf Hitler dated Eva Braun, and Eva Braun was Blond, and so is Madonna, and Madonna shared a stage once with Bruce Springstein, and Bruce Springstein is an Obama fan! So an Obama presidency will be just like Nazi Germany!!!!”

Posted by: fontapa | May 12, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

brown1925
Your list will grow.
And it’ll grow long and winding like the weed Obama is.
Most people just don’t know aboutObama enough.
Obama is slippery.
Obama always has his eyes on the back door in case the party gets even too dirty for him, but he can’t erase his name when he signed in…..unless he saids one of his aids signed him in….who happens to have the same handwriting as Obama.

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 12, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

alindra
Wow — what rationalization. I suppose you see no problem with Michelle’s $100K raise after the earmark was delivered.

Posted by: T | May 12, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Good gathering up of yet more information that shows that this guy is far from ready for prime time. (Remember how he also loses papers, so don’t hand him any.)
Why aren’t gthe Democrats doing THEIR job and asking HIM to drop out????

Posted by: Tricia | May 12, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Not 6 degrees….just one
Axelrod.
Master Advertiser
Master Candidate Maker
Deval wants to run a 50 state Voter Reg. for Obama—–> you can see for yourself what an idiot Deval is.
Deval even admits to “lending” Obama his Speeches–how can he lend when they really belonged to AXELROD in the first place.
Folks please look again at Rev Wright when he said at the Press Club when he called Obama a POLITICIAN.
This guys KNOWS Obama.
FOR 20 YEARS.
AXELORD does not like Rev.Wright.
Guess why?

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | May 12, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Barack Obama for president
Cindy Sheehan for vice-president
A liberals best dream come true!

Posted by: T | May 12, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Well, that’s what staff are for, right? Shows good delegation on Obama’s part….

Posted by: Tully | May 12, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Don’t believe the hype! Obama wants your guns! He says he respects the 2nd amendment but also says that he wants to reinstate the so called “Assault Weapons Ban.” Remember, WV and KY, Obama wants your guns!

Posted by: Aaron Burr | May 12, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

dl,
Are you debating who is the worst candidate?
If you think Obama is the same impection as others, why you chose him?
We are not debating who is the worst..
We are debating who is the best one to lead this country..
Certainly you have your own view and others won’t share with you..

Posted by: True Truth | May 12, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

“Never trust anyone who comes out of the democrat corrupt political machine. And especially don’t trust one running for president.”
So you’re not for Clinton either? Careful, you’re Republican slip is showing. Tsk Tsk, all this time posing as a Clinton Supporter…

Posted by: fontapa | May 12, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Apparently, being a “new kind” of leader merely requires a knack for being asleep at the switch whenever a train goes off the track and then blaming it on the engineer. If they cause so many of the problems, one might begin to wonder how many of Obama’s meagre “accomplishments” were really the work of his suborninates, too. I can see it now, “The devastion left in the wake of our precipitous withdrawal from Iraq was the fault of the generals, who obviously were underqualified to conduct the kind of unconditional surrender my brilliantly insightful policy called for.”

Posted by: Dave H | May 12, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

A questionnaire from 1996. Something that was put in a memo. A university getting a grant. You people make me sick. Oh yeah, and Obama is black. And he went to the Church in his Community that was responsible for good works in that community. You all sure have your priorities in order. They say sometimes people have to hit rock bottom before they change. It looks like this country does too. Divide and conquer, just like Iraq.

Posted by: notagain | May 12, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

true truth
I just answered your questions.
You asked them…or made those statements…Obama is the best but for all those statments you made trying to take him down…I addressed them specifically.
His plans are ver different than Mccain’s. They are similar but in specific instances different than Clinton…
Who is the best…I addressed that in the long email answering all theways you tried to say Obama was worse…but all of your statements questions are not based in the issues or the specific facts of the details of their plans and what they have actually done for actions.
The Iran obliterate comments, the policing the middle east comments, the lack of apoloy for voting to approve the war and giving the Presidency limited congressional oversight, and her reckless statements that are being used now by Iran and North korea…not to mention the terrorists…and having them replayed on Arabic television over and over… all show she is not the image or the decision making person this country needs. We need support on every front from the world community now.
Our greatest strength was the image of America as a great and noble country where democracy worked/works. That old time politicians and empires and political machines do not outweight the will of the people. That we know we made a mistake with Iraq… that we respect sovereign nations and that we aren’t arrogant and selfish enough to see we have to change our ways toward energy, the environment, as a neighbor and a world resident…
We need people to want to “buy American”… we need people to know the truth…that with India and China and the rest of the world becoming a global economy and using energy more and more…if we don’t start curbing our gasoline intake… what happens to our grandchildren when they have no oil for things like Planes, and trains, and cargo ships…and things that will not find other safe power sources for a century perhaps…
what happens when we no longer have that oil.
We waste so much money on war and gamesmanship, losing at the trade game more and more and it is getting worse.
We need the world market and we need the world to want to work with a noble country.
That means we have to be noble.
Only one candidate conveys that.

Posted by: dl | May 12, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

dl,
Thanks for defending your “best” mam!
1. I hate people claimed he represent a new politics while he came from the same old and played the same old ( you can deny but the fact is the fact)
2. I hate people claimed he was anit-war and present the will of people when 70% of people approved War on 2002 and 70% of people’s delegates voted for it…( it is fine Obama talked about anti-war, it is democracy). But don’t claim you represented the will of people on War on 2002..
3. As I mentioned, he offered no solution to end of War excepting repeating his same old anti-war speech -just playing old politiical blaming game without mentioning his several top senotor backer did the same thing…
4. I don’t think anyone should admit it was wrong to vote for War at that specific circumstance… I am totally with 77 senators who have voted for War to take no risk or gambling for American life… What others voted or spoke against it to me is just gambling people’s life.. it is the failure of Bush to end this war soon… Obama turned the failure of Bush against his fellow senotors while he had no responsibility to vote for this country yet…
5. Whether his plans can work not is still debating and he has no proven records to solve economy issue, the difference of proposals from all candidates are different approaches with different pro and cons and will benefitting different group of people, so why people should pick Obama’s?
6. You mentioned he will bring a new face of US to the world, by what? by negotiating terrorists like his campaign just did with Hamas? if Iran dares to launch the war to our ally, do you want to still wait and talk until second 9-11 or pearl harbor happened again?
7. He admitted himself he is a quiter when he said he can’t win PA, he can’t win WV and KY…He can’t fight for a uphill battle.. Do you think Americans need a quiter to lead them?
So what is he so good at?

Posted by: True Truth | May 12, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

It’s called having a victim mentality. If there is always someone to blame, then I can do nothing wrong. There is a utility in this. “Disadvantaged” people do it all the time and look at all the free stuff they get from the government. Democrats LOVE being victims and they love other people wanting to be victims, because it gives them an opportunity to bring them into the Democratic Party…free handouts to everyone who will vote for us.

Posted by: davenp35 | May 12, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

NSA: “President Obama, please wake up quickly. Iran has just launched a nulear attack on Israel. Preliminary estimates are that as many as 75% of the population are either dead or will die within the next 7 days. The attack was launched from Syria.”
Obama: “Tell the press that my staff screwed up and did not notify me. We promise to do better. Oh yes, and those who are critical of me? Make sure you point out that the critics are racists.”

Posted by: paul a'barge | May 12, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Is he not responsible for anything?

Posted by: navyvet48 | May 12, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

I am going to enjoy seeing him taken down by the GOP.

Posted by: don't care | May 12, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

That crow pie just isn’t big enough.

Posted by: MaggieW | May 12, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Obama is every bit as slippery as Bubba.

Posted by: merle | May 12, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

You’re saying that Obama can’t hire good help? What about Hillary’s staffers? Mark Penn, her former campaign manager, Patty Solis-Doyle, members of her finance team that have left. How much does she owe Penn now, something like 8 million dollars? Two staffers in Iowa had to resign for forwarding the muslim email smear, the guy in New Hampshire who was forced to resign, how many more are there? And you’re questioning his staffers? He’s the one that’s won the nomination with his “bad staffers”, she lost.

Posted by: Carolyn Grace | May 12, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

How can he continue to take credit for things that work out but blame others if it doesn’t. He has no moral compass, he blames others…remember it’s not his fault all those people in small towns are so clingy and huggy and bigoted. it’s not his fault. And if elected, just like Bush, he doesn’t know, didn’t do it, or someone else did. it’s the OLDEST POLITICS IN THE UNIVERSE. The only thing you missed in the article is how Ayers, Wright and the others aren’t his fault either, he didn’t know, didn’t care or didn’t mind….untill it was him being trashed…it’s okay if it’s just us voters being insulted. I only hold what Obama actually said about voters against him.

Posted by: Ginger | May 12, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Great article! This is why we’ve come to
know W.O.R.M. What Obama ReallY Meant
was. The MSM has decided they are more important than voters! There are mil-
lions left to vote. Obama despite the
talk, has yet to secure the actual nom-
ination. That won’t happen until Denver.
Alot can happen between now and then.
Delegates can declare for Obama, SD’s
can. What won’t unify the party is de-
negrating Sen.Clinton or supporters.
When Sen. Kennedy stayed in the race
against Carter and he didn’t have more
than 600 delegates, no one in the MSM
urged him out. Jesse Jackson went to
the convention, Gary Hart, so all this
negative talk and media hand ringing is
quite a crock! Run the race Sen. Obama
this is for the Presidency!
You can’t run just where you have an expectation of winning. Hillary is
fearless. As a veteran with friends who
voted in Jan from the dienfranchised
states, who are vets, Obama will not
see their votes in Nov., unless they
count NOW, should he be the nominee.

Posted by: Raven | May 12, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

While I read this, I could only think of the votes he “made by mistake”…

Posted by: Leisa | May 12, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Whole Foods is a big corporation. I guess that means that all the people who shop there and work there are right wingers. George Soros is a billionaire who has his fingers in all sorts of mega business dealings. Guess he’s a right winger too. Most Ivy League universities have huge endowments and get tons of money via marketing deals from NCAA football and basketball. I guess that means that college professors are right wingers too.

Posted by: The Fop | May 12, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Obama will be a disaster for this country. Playing the blame game may get him the nomination, but will get him crucified in the White House. But I don’t think he will get there, sooner or later that house of cards will fold.

Posted by: Andy | May 12, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Democrats… snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Posted by: A reader in Georgia | May 12, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

This is such a weak excuse for news or even an interesting article. Do you realize how many things go in and out of a candidates’ campaign mailings, speeches, talking points, etc. Hundreds….there are bound to be some mistakes and if Obama is not so great at checking all the blanks, so be it….there are a lot more important things to focus on that this stuff. where he made big mistakes, he apologized and explained.
you must be having a boring day or else no imagination.

Posted by: Ellen | May 12, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Oh, God… I’m so depressed. How, when we Dems had such a rich slate of experienced contenders, did it come down to this? Obama… I’m just nauseous at the prospect. Sadly, this may be the first year in a lifetime that I don’t vote.

Posted by: Jayne | May 12, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

It’s getting really crowded down here under the bus, where Obama has thrown all of us.

Posted by: OxyCon | May 12, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

The reason Obama looks so tired?….. It’s hard work throwing people under the bus.

Posted by: Ellen | May 12, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

I’ve been noticing this side of Obama myself..who is he going to blame if he becomes the President?

Posted by: Dawn | May 12, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

You know what’s funny? How rotten all these Obama supporters are going to feel when they realize that Obama is only using them to get what he wants. Throughout Obama’s career, he’s used people like dish rags in order to advance himself. Then he discards the ones he no longer needs.
He’s a “stepper”. Haven’t we all seen his type way too many times at work? It’s all about him and helping him get what he wants.

Posted by: OxyCon | May 12, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Clearly that bus he threw Granny and Wright under is getting quite crowded with a slew of “incompetent” staffers and God knows who else. Barack Obama simply will not take an responsibility for anything done in his name. He has no “clue” what’s going on? QUOTE: “I wasn’t a decision maker in any of this process.” And when WILL he decide to be a decision maker? When he takes the oath of office?????? It will be pretty late by that time.
Just what the devil DOES this man DO besides give speeches??? That’s about it, folks. He talks. BOY does he talk, and talk and talk… snore… Even when presented with PROOF of his own handwriting on a questionaire that a “staffer” originally filled out, he continues to deny he knew about it (hmmm, could he have early onset age-related dementia??)and lay blame on others. Is this the type of politician you want as the leader of the free world??? Inexperienced, hasn’t a clue what’s going on in his administration and can’t take a stand on any important votes or issues. Yeah, that would be a disaster of Titanic proportions.

Posted by: PDMM in L.A. | May 12, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

The Buck Stops Here but the bus keeps on keepin’ on.
That is B.O.’s slogan. Unlike Harry …Barry is so transparent, at least Hillary admitted she mispoke and told a Fish Story, B.O. just keeps throwin’ folks under the bus. While collecting the eager born again in Obama faithful…hard-earned coin..

Posted by: LL Barra | May 12, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

The Buck Stops Here but the bus keeps on keepin’ on.
That is B.O.’s slogan. Unlike Harry …Barry is so transparent, at least Hillary admitted she mispoke and told a Fish Story, B.O. just keeps throwin’ folks under the bus. While collecting the eager born again in Obama faithful…hard-earned coin..

Posted by: LL Barra | May 12, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Oxycon said “…Sadly, this may be the first year in a lifetime that I don’t vote.”
Not voting is not the answer. I became a citizen 30+ years ago and in that time I have only once been given a half way decent choice by our “LEADERS”. As citizens it is our duty to make a choice even if it between bad and worse. It is hard being a citizen when you have such worthless politicians.

Posted by: Zain Banatwala | May 12, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Leisa…so true!!
He has so many variations of the dog ate my homework, it isn’t even funny.
He forgets, makes boneheaded moves, is “present,” but does not vote, and loses important personal papers from his time as a State Senator because they got stored or thrown away.
When the media finally decides to put his feet to the fire the American public can be certain it will hear another LAME excuse. No wonder he doesn’t talk about his good judgement anymore.

Posted by: sherr | May 12, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

In fact, BO wouldn’t have told us 57 states. It is that darnbird staff again, and BO can show U the notes that he prepared for BO.
BO again makes a boneheaded mistake as usual to tell you honestly from the note.
BO has the credit of leadership and your inspiration. His staff is supposed to cover his ass and takes his fall.
Day and day, I see lots of BO, the real one, it is hilarious to see the little timer like him bragging and bragging and then always find his shoes in his mouth.
57 states. He should start name them since he wants to be the father of these new-born states. How about BO, BP, BQ. BR. BS1. BS2, BS3.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 12, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

That a candidate like this can get this far in the process is an indictment of the press and those that only see what they want to believe.
Here’s another Obama caucus voter going for McCain in the Fall.

Posted by: Fernando | May 12, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

All the unpaid tickets while going to Harvard, sitting for 20 years and listening to the hateful and racist sermons at Wright’s church, befriending Ayers, entering into a real estate deal with Retzo, voting “present”-all of those events weren’t Obama’s fault.
They were all someone’s fault but not Obama’s fault. Someone? Anyone? Um, it’s Grandma’s fault. No, it’s staff’s fault. Wait, it is definitely Hillary’s fault. How about McCain? But Jake wrote this article so it must be his fault. It’s everyones fault but not Obama.

Posted by: Judy | May 12, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Seems Sen. Obama’s hasn’t been the canidate with staffing problems.
“One e-mail that has been circulating widely across the Internet reads in part, “Let us all remain alert concerning Obama’s expected presidential candidacy. The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the U.S. from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest level- through the President of the United States, one of their own!!!”
For the record, Obama is (was)a member of the United Church of Christ and has never been a Muslim.
But it’s difficult to blame some naïve public bystanders when the e-mail is also being circulated by members of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s volunteer campaign staff. In the past several weeks, two members of Clinton’s Iowa staff have been forced to resign for forwarding the e-mail, reports CNN.com.
Clinton’s campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle disavowed the e-mail after terminating the volunteer workers. The Obama camp has declined to comment, only saying his campaign wouldn’t be derailed by “small-time tactics,” reports Wonkette.
Obama’s religious affiliation has been well dissected in the press. CNN, as well as several other media outlets, debunked false reports about Obama’s religious upbringing earlier this year. There were false reports that Obama was educated in a “radical Muslim school known as madrassa.” This is false. According to the CNN report, Obama attended a Muslim school while living in Indonesia as a child, but it was not madrassa, which teaches the most fundamental views.

Posted by: ginger | May 12, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

out of fairness to all the presidential canidates, please post the staffing problems of Sens. Cliton and McCain from 1992 to present. I’m sure Sen. Obama isn’t the only one with prior and/or present staffing problems.
Thank you.

Posted by: ginger | May 12, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

I’ll trust an honest mistake by Obama any day over the dishonest,lying,self-serving Clintons. It be hard indeed (actually impossible I imagine) to find a single day where the Clintons haven’t lied in the last 16 years.

Posted by: George J. | May 12, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Gosh, GeorgeJ, to whom did you direct your presidential ballot in the nineties?

Posted by: rrk | May 12, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Anyone with a brain and a little bit of wisdom could see this guy walking down the pike a long time ago. It’s too bad they don’t teach common sense in college.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | May 12, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

1. It sure seems like Clinton and McCain are the ones dealing with major turnover issues at senior levels. What does that say about their judgment when it comes to picking secretaries?
2. The results speak for themself.

Posted by: Ed Kohler | May 12, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Another Clinton Staffer tries again.
By the way they do teach commen sense in school, its called critical thinking.
“False Charges in the Blogosphere That Obama Is Attacking Baby Boomers Who Opposed the Vietnam War”
May 12th, 2008 by Ron Chusid
“Have you heard the one where Obama is now dissing baby boomers who were against the Vietnam War? Hopefully not, because it is not true. Just in case the Clinton supporters persist in this false claim I thought it would be useful to document what Obama actually said and how it is being distorted. Obama said:
One of the saddest episodes in our history was the degree to which returning vets from Vietnam were shunned, demonized and neglected by some because they served in an unpopular war. Too many of those who opposed the war in Vietnam chose to blame not only the leaders who ordered the mission, but the young men who simply answered their country’s call. Four decades later, the sting of that injustice is a wound that has never fully healed, and one that should never be repeated.
This is perfectly reasonable. Most of us who opposed the war considered those who fought in Vietnam to be victims of a terrible policy. There is controversy as to what degree the returning vets were “shunned, demonized and neglected by some” but regardless of how prevalent it was such an attitude was wrong. Many Democrats who oppose the Iraq war are also making the same point about opposing the war but supporting the troops.
Jonathan Martin first spins this as “repudiating boomers.” Clinton supporter Jeralyn Merritt takes advantage of this to concentrate on the false spin as opposed to what Obama actually said, running a dishonest headline claiming “Obama Disses Boomers Who Opposed Vietnam War.”
My major concern is the manner in which Obama’s comments are being distorted by both the rightwing and by Clinton supporters (sorry if this is redundant).” There are also some other peripheral issues which Nitpicker and Instaputz cover.
This entry was posted on Monday, May 12th, 2008.

Posted by: ginger | May 12, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

After one, possibly two stolen elections,
a president who has broken every law there is and gets away with it, an administration that mocks and disgraces morality and legality throughout the world, I am confused, what part of right wing conspiracy are you having trouble grasping. And everyone laughed at Hillary for saying that but unfortunately she was right.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | May 13, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Now finally somebody analyzed how he manages his staffers.
Don’t just critize Hillary.
He always throw some rocks and blame it to his staffers.
He would say: That’s not what I meant.
Oh, I lost that paper. that’s not my handwriting. I don’t relate to him at all(Rezko).
Now..who is losing his bearings?

Posted by: blue Irish | May 13, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Looks like he started to throw lots of people also not only his staffers.
He threw his pastor, his foreign advisor which had meeting with hamas and who is next?
I wonder, his bus will be full then.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 13, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Actually long time ago one network reported that in Illinois he never press the button, always fails and neglets it.
But,,,,he is untouchable man.
Nobody can do anything even DNC is on his side.
What can we do?
Only you can save this country,,,voters be smart! Before it too late!
Hillary 08.

Posted by: blue Irish | May 13, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Jake, Obama didn’t say his staffers didn’t count up the Rezko donations properly. I think they got the direct donations just fine, but later they decided to include donations from associates of Rezko. That can be difficult to determine, but I don’t think anyone was blaming staff for that.

Posted by: Tom J | May 13, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Great! Appreciate the nit-picking of Obama. What is next, Jake? Obama picks his nose or he farts in his sleep. Seriously, how is what you just wrote important?

Posted by: Roye | May 13, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Well, Jake, I respect you as a great reporter. Reporters look for the truth. I have been waiting to hear the appeal of the Paul v. Clinton case be reported on ABC.
Here is some info for you. On April 25th, Judge Aurellio Munoz ruled that Senator Clinton does not have to testify in the Fraud case until AFTER the General Election. That would be a huge deterant to Senator Obama offering her the VP position.
Report this story, Jake. I am interested in seeing your piece about this DNC Fundraiser who appears to be on the outs with the party.

Posted by: Kathy in Michigan | May 13, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Obama and Reverend Wright is along the same lines; I did not know he preached such things….give a break, please.

Posted by: tmatters | May 13, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Now if only you were as diligent researching the current administration as you seem to be researching the next.

Posted by: zak degrassi | May 13, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Kathy in Michigan, you have your facts wrong regarding Paul v. Clinton or you do not have the latest in the decisions made by two courts. The first court dismissed the case against Clinton and the appeals court did so as well. Spin, spin, spin. Not nice.

Posted by: Mandelay3 | May 13, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

fair enough, are you tracking the same thing for mccain and clinton? I ask, because my impression is that most politicians deflect those kinds of low-level gotcha-type questions by claiming to be personally ignorant of the charge. Not saying I like it, but I don’t think Obama is any worse in this regard than other politicos. Prove me wrong by honestly looking back over other politicians statements.

Posted by: dave | May 13, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Whatever the problem is Barack supporters, blame it on the Clintons. Rev Wright says something stupid, oh he was invited to the Clinton White House when Bill had his problems. A photo appears on Drudge of BHO in Africa, blame it on Clinton campaign. BHO association with Ayers, oh Bill Clinton pardoned them too. Tony Reszko being a slum lord in Chicago and connection to Obama, oh there is a photo of him with Bill and Hillary. BHO did not return to Senate to vote on Iran resolution, oh I was in NH campaigning but he says Hillary has once again given Bush authorization to wage another war. The feelings within the Clinton camp and her supporter is deep because BHO gets away with all these flaws and gaffes. Put the shoe on the other foot and you will see the feeding frenzy. On this score, I am not persuaded that I or other Hillary supporters will quickly fold up and rally behind BHO. I personally feel more comfortable going to sleep at night knowing Hillary or McCain is in charge of this country. Sorry it is a genuine feeling.

Posted by: Mark | May 13, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Thanks for pointing out the obvious. Senator Obama is starting to act an awful lot like GWB. NOTHING is ever his fault. You get what you see. Is this the type of President the country needs?

Posted by: JUST THE FACTS M'AM | May 13, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

So, Obama delegates, so what? So did Reagan. The disadvantages include being vulnerable to petty sniping like this article. But on the plus side, it’s the mark of an effective commander.

Posted by: Renatta McPhee | May 13, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Rule Number One- Do not criticize The Messiah.
Rule Number Two- Remember, do not criticize The Messiah.

Posted by: The Truth | May 13, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

What is that French proverb? La Cage aux folles! You are known and judged by the company you keep and “birds of a feather do indeed flock together.” Obama may use lies, deception and hypocrisy to conceal his true values from the American people, but if voters want to know about the real Obama, just take a closer look at the company he keeps and who has working on his campaign staff. And just think that if he wins in November, all these left wing nuts will be strutting around (like Obama does on stage) the White House barking orders and throwing their weight around. God help us!

Posted by: Billy Joe | May 13, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

yawn

Posted by: Jim B | May 13, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

I don’t agree that Obama has a habit of “blaming” staff for things that have gone wrong in the campaign. I work for a fairly small company and I see all kinds of “staff” errors made around here every day. I think that staff people, and sometimes volunteers do make errors and it is okay to hold them responsible. How many people screwed up in the Clinton campaign. How many guys have recently resigned from the McCain campaign. It happens and it is not a big deal. You have to stop making stuff up.

Posted by: Lowell | May 13, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

It is a fact that the media has become quite irrelevant in providing real news and has an increasingly hard time manipulating the public’s views, witness ABC’s efforts to cut Obama at the knees with manufactured handicaps. On the other hand, the media remains silent on anything negative about McCain. What about an in-depth story probing McCain’s relationship with lobbyists and specifically Ms. Iseman. Inquiring minds want to know.

Posted by: Melissa | May 13, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

It is a fact that the media has become quite irrelevant in providing real news and has an increasingly hard time manipulating the public’s views, witness ABC’s efforts to cut Obama at the knees with manufactured handicaps. On the other hand, the media remains silent on anything negative about McCain. What about an in-depth story probing McCain’s relationship with lobbyists and specifically Ms. Iseman. Inquiring minds want to know.

Posted by: Melissa | May 13, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Jake, I hope you realize that by writing anything even remotely anti-Obama you will be criticized and fired as a part of the racist right-wing smear machine. Don’t bother updating your resume either. You’ll be blacklisted…

Posted by: Real American | May 13, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Can we have a mulligan in the presidential race for both parties? All 3 of these candidates will be historically atrocious presidents and the damage the winner will wreak on this country will be devastating and long lasting.

Posted by: Real American | May 13, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Having Obama in office will be like another George Bush, just Democrat. He clearly has no idea what is going on. If he can’t make it work in Chicago – how can he for all of the US & in their international relations?? What a dope. Still can’t believe he has that many backers after all of this is coming out.
Jack, you better work your magic. Otherwise, he is going to be your president too unless you move out of the country.
I am yet another voter who will have no choice but to go with McCain if Obama gets the nomination. Still sad that he doesn’t even feel the need to promote in WV. Will he give up on America too or will we have to guess which states he will turn a blind eye to?

Posted by: kim jones | May 13, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Senator Obama: “uh uh, yeah, uh uh, what Hillary said, uh uh”. He can’t give a straight answer or take blame. He lacks character and strength– he has practiced old time smear politics while pretending to be a change candidate. He didn’t have the courage to stand up to Wright for 20 years. No surprise that he doesn’t take responsibility for small matters either.

Posted by: Kerry | May 13, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

This is just another indicator that Sen. Obama is a mixed race, liberal version of our current President.
Arrogance: check
Never admits mistakes: check
Blame others: check
Relevant experience: nope
Why do we keep electing these losers?

Posted by: Dave | May 13, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

I suppose Obama’s staffers encouraged him to hang out with Ayres and Wright as well. Look, this guy is either the biggest suck-up ever or he has the worst judgement I’ve ever seen. He talks about political reconciliation yet he’s never, ever, crossed the aisle to work with the GOP on any issue. He clearly talks a big game but that’s it. John McCain has walked it for years. You Obama folks enjoy it while you can. McCain will win 42 states. No way we turn the country over to this over inflated wind bag.

Posted by: Jay Johnson | May 13, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

So let me get this straight… You’re essentially trying to break Senator Obama’s campaign from the inside, right? Its basic psyhcology… Convince his staffers that he’s not as great as he appears and then hope for an implosion. I can understand how politicians can get ridiculous, but how do we trust our media when journalists start wallowing in petty?
This story was unnecessary and the last half of the story was essentially a blatant political attack. Stop being a political assassin who legitimizes their attacks by saying you’re an advocate for the people and start actually reporting on what these candidates are saying, what their background is, their plans and their visions. THAT’s how you serve the American people well.
You’re pathetic if you think that this trash constitutes as helpful.

Posted by: Greggory Heist | May 13, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

why is this coming out now???

Posted by: kim jones | May 13, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

I thank God Clinton will be dropping out next week. She miserably failed in her task of reforming health care as the First Lady. That was her ONLY responsibility and she failed within a year. I am glad we can finally unite behind Obama for November without Clinton adding selfish and unnecessary drama.

Posted by: Eric | May 13, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Boy does the truth hurt. This list will grow–not because of incomponent staff but rather Obama’s inability to own up to his history.

Posted by: Robert in Cleveland | May 13, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Eric, What a naive thing to say. Sen. Clinton’s health care plan failed because the men in Congress did not want a First Lady to take care of things that they had been unable to do. She went on to work for work towards at least having children of uninsured people covered. Obama is the one that is a drama diva, blaming everybody but himself for his mistakes. He did not accomplish anything as a State Senator. If he is the Democratic nominee, McCain will win. It is as simple as that.

Posted by: svsolis | May 13, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

To all Clinton supporters … please do not support Obama in November — if he gets there (but I don’t think I have to plead too much given what I’m hearing from Hillary supporters everywhere). This article states well that Obama has a lot of unpacked baggage and we’re better off with the enemy we know than the monstrous phony we don’t know.

Posted by: Ike | May 13, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Are people on this blog actually saying Obama did not play the race card. GET OVER YOURSELF, this is NOW FACT. Your candidate is not holier than thou, in fact, this idea of a “clean” campaign is all the worse because you are coming off as HYPOCRITES. To boot, many of you are snapping at Hillary and her supporters on this blog as a testament to your true nature. You are eerily, eerily like Bush supporters and I am just so worried to have the liberal equivalent. I want a true uniter and its not Obama nor his supporters.

Posted by: james | May 13, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

These are mild causes for concern, indeed. But a few things to point out: First, Team Barak is probably as inexperienced as was Team Lincoln in the early going; mistakes are inevitable. Second, when Barak wins he says “We won,” so when he goofs up it is no surprise that “we goofed up.” Third, Barak seems to have made a genuine effort to make things right. And last, these are all less than significant in comparison to the giant gaffs of Clinton, McCain, Bush, and most experienced politicians, who with time learn to carefully screen such distractions. A minus, no doubt, but given Barak’s superior ability to raise money and to manage his campaign, it seems a mere trifle.

Posted by: philofficer | May 13, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Yeah right Obamas staff is disciplined and Professional… thats like saying that Obama prefers to hang out at regular people places eating waffles and stopping in a Mcdonalds to get a Cheeseburger and telling people how to fix the economy on the way out… BO is a mirror of Ws campaign ablilitys and Gores lack of being comfortable combined… they are not disciplined and seem to pile on the electorate that they need to win the GE which they wotn get and BO will not win!

Posted by: NCDem | May 13, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

– Flotsam. or better yet, in fishing terms this piece would be called chum.
It is meant to stir, not inform, to create a caricature, not to characterize critically or fairly, and so just stirs debate among the choir. — All politicians always pass the buck some. Name one who hasn’t, one.
…and it looks like the chumming worked…

Posted by: Patrick | May 13, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Haha, here we go again, ABC trying to knock down Obama. It’s not going to work. The American people are smarter than you think.

Posted by: Ryan | May 13, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Ryan
Thank Goodness there are more people in the american electorate that can balance you out… since you dont have much sense!

Posted by: NCDem | May 13, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Nice summary- what a scam Obama’s got going- play dirty and keep lying; if busted, blame subordinates. Somebody tell Obama that the buck stops at the Boss’ desk; he needs to start taking responsibility. Imagine, if the US faced a terror threat and a President Obama does not react, will he cop out by saying “My administration did not inform me”???

Posted by: Ryan G. | May 13, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

ABC what is wrong with you Obama can do NO WORNG…. Fall in line with the rest of the media if you know whats good for you. No one wants real news anymore. People want you to spit back to them they want you too say. Forget about the truth

Posted by: Chicago Joe | May 13, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Boy, the liberal fascists have a good one here! Not only is he an anti-American Marxist who also happens to be a racist, he is also the man who listened to a raving maniac for 20 years and never heard a word that was said. Is it any wonder he disses his staff members; look what he did to his grandmother?

Posted by: Katz | May 13, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

I Puked on the Kool Aid! I wish I’d written that!

Posted by: Alice Cooper | May 13, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Remember, Obama is going to transform this country (nay, the world!) by the brute force of his awesome personality and goodness.
Unless a staffer screws it up.

Posted by: A3k | May 13, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

It is not odd that in an intense multi-million dollar campaign, lasting for over a year, and months of constant campaigning by thousands of paid and unpaid workers, that there are errors not attributable to Obama’s personal decisions.
14 mistakes sounds like a very, very low number – you must be right, Obama’s staff is pretty capable.

Posted by: John | May 13, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Why does John McCain hate this country allowing a war to bankrupt us making us even less safe? Why does he hate this country allowing a pastor’s support who believes the wrath of God came down on New Orleans for a “Gay parade.” Does God hate the American South in general for all the tornadoes, floods, fires, and hurricanes? HE MUST according to this pastor’s thought process.

Posted by: Patrick | May 13, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Obama is a joke: words, words matter.

Posted by: jenkins | May 13, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Obama has been given a free pass since Iowa by the lame stream media and the DNC. He is inexperienced and unvetted. This takes AFFIRMATIVE ACTION to a whole new level!

Posted by: NYSmike | May 13, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

This is such a joke. Obama is the only candidate who has admitted a mistake since Bush has been in office.

Posted by: KQuark | May 13, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

All you Obama supporters …
Please wake up …
Obama is conning you …
He claims to be a healer, a uniter and a moderate …
Yet you know he has never acted on any of those claims … EVER …
Why is that ?
Its a con folks … pure and simple …
Wake up before you do the stupidist thing in your life …

Posted by: Jeff | May 13, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

wow, this is news? of all the important things to talk about, this is what have to report on?
this news team has lost ALL of my respect this year. I think the real team who has failed to hire good help is ABC News!
another viewer sayin bye bye

Posted by: Zaggy | May 13, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Let’s see, Clinton’s top strategist didn’t know that the Dem. primaries delegates were allotted proportionally,
her campaign got beat by an unknown, African American, first term senator and you say he has staffing problems…great laugh, thanks.
bdu

Posted by: bdavid | May 13, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Name one ‘big’ mistake Obama has fessed up to… Still trying to think of one? Yeah that’s because he hasn’t.
Obama runs on no record and viciously attacks any mistakes his opponents have ever made. He wants to hold both sides of every issue. He wants to say he is for universal health care becuase that is popular, but his plan doesn’t call for universal health care then he attacks Hillary for the provisions of her plan that make it universal health care.
He ran for 8 months on Hillary’s Iraq vote but when asked how he would have voted in 2004 (when the war was going well) he said he didn’t know how he would have voted.
Obama skips hundreds of contentious votes in the Illinois State Senate to leave no record of anything anyone could criticize him for.
Obama is no leader. He is a cheerleader. (Wow, one more similarity between him and George W).

Posted by: Michaelp0429 | May 13, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Wow! Sen. Obama made reference to mistakes made by his staff 10-14 times in 12 years? Really? They made 14 mistakes in 12 years and because he mentioned them he thinks they’re incompetent? What a monster! Way to spread the propaganda. . .

Posted by: Jon | May 13, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

I supposed it was also his staff’s fault he thinks there are 57 states!!!!!

Posted by: Scott D | May 13, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

I suppose it is also his staff’s fault that Obama thinks there are 57 states.

Posted by: Scott D | May 13, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Richard Cohen wrote a horrible op-ed in the post today about how McCain has lost his values because his staff sent out an email containing the Hamas leaders quote endorsing Obama. Cohen acted as if this was an act by McCain and McCain only dispite the fact that McCain has said repeatedly that he does not believe that Hamas would be happy with an Obama presidency, just that Hamas would be very unhappy with a McCain presidency. This in contrast to Obama who repeatedly refuses to condemn his own campaign’s missteps and instead blames his staffers at evey possible moment.

Posted by: Logan | May 13, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

I wonder which staffer’s fault it is that rev. Wright is a racist.

Posted by: Logan H | May 13, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

What a joke calling Obama’s campaign incompetent when they ran the best campaign since a little know governor named Bill Clinton.

Posted by: KQuark | May 13, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Could Jake Tapper sink any lower? This is a journalist? What a hack job this bozo turned out to be. I was once an ABC News watcher — Peter Jennings was a hero of mine — but these days they are behaving as utter hacks.

Posted by: Jesse | May 13, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Look at the electoral map people. This man cannot win the general. The Republicans are going to beat him over the head that he cannot win the WHITE blue collar vote. We are dreaming if we think these people are kidding. Just remember Tom Bradley and as Doug Wilder admitted on a recent talk show it is there and they have to find a way to deal with it. I believe the results of WV showed that tonight. The strategy they are using now that is to try to appeal to blue collar workers by visiting a few will not work.

Posted by: James | May 13, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Obama is okay wtih admitting mistakes… other people’s mistakes. He’s a hypocrite and the people posting here seem to have a blind loyalty to a guy they don’t even know. I’d be having serious buyer’s remorse if I were an Iowan right about now.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 13, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

This has bugged me about Obama since day 1. It’s ok to blame your staff for mistakes but a real leader takes responsibility for decisions made by his staff. I don’t feel comfortable when he says he has no knowledge about goings on in his organization. The closest Obama has ever come to (grudgingly) admitting a mistake was following the San Francisco comments and that was only after he tried very hard to deflect ownership in his first couple of press conferences.
I am reminded of the way Bush has never expressed regret for the way he bungled Iraq.

Posted by: CAS | May 13, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Obama is the liberal version of Bush. Out of touch, stubborn, inexperienced, dangerous, idealistic, made of teflon, etc. Do we really want to make the same mistake again? Same kind of person, different perspective. I’m not willing to take that risk!

Posted by: Sara in PA | May 13, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

“And for the record, yet again, let me state that I find Sen. Obama’s staff unfailingly competent and polite, courteous and efficient, and I once again express my regret that Sen. Obama does apparently not feel the same way.”
This is more than silly. It’s just plain dumb. Who do you think Tapper has to blame (or credit) for the quality of Obama’s campaign staff and how well managed his campaign has been? Who should we blame for how poorly Clinton’s campaign has been run?…or for why she has so much less money? Half of Obama’s campaign money comes from people like me who donate less than $200.
Who should we blame for the gutter level political gameswomanship that desperately tries to show guilt by association and distracts from substantive issues? Who should we credit for not stooping to the same thing, but who continues to congratulate her for her victories and hush his supporters when they boo her?
Some of the examples Tapper provides are perfectly reasonable responses from Obama, and do not go any further than claiming simple human errors and oversights to which any staff, no matter how capable, is vulnerable. Some comments here are clearly coming from people wearing very deeply colored glasses, people who fail to show the slightest hint of objectivity.
How can some be so poor at reading body language and clearly radiated low-ball attitudes that they can’t see through either of the Clintons even if they are completely ignorant of the Clintons’ totally sold-out status with regard to some pretty rotten corporate interests? (Monsanto comes to mind with their aggressive suing for patent violation of farmers whose pureline crops they contaminate and ruin with their genetically engineered pollen).
Have some of us completely lost any feel at all for reading basic human character (or utter lack of it). Clinton acts like a spoiled rotten brat who thinks she has a God-given right to the presidency and telegraphs her stinky attitude with body language that cries, “But I’M supposed to be president. This isnt’ fair! Wha-a-a-a-a!!!
But far worse, I’m talking total corruption, and that’s precisely what we need to get rid of in this country. We need people of character and moral fiber who don’t forget that they weren’t shot at in Bosnia (a relatively mild example of her lies!!!). Hsven’t we had enough of liars in the presidency?
We don’t need another intelligent but corrupt dingbat that pretends to be one more “bubba” so she can get elected. Some of us have matured beyond that stage. We’ve had enough of bubbas. Those who vote for bubbas need to have their heads examined.
The presidency doesn’t call for a bubba and election campaigns shouldn’t be a high school popularity contest. That’s a big part of how we got into the mess we’re in, and I blame us, the voters. JFK said there were only two qualifications for becoming president in this country: to be over 35 and to win a presidential election.
We need to put our heads on straight and vote for a real leader with character and integrity and quit voting for bubbas.

Posted by: Straight_t;alk | May 13, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

First off, the article is silly and will get no play in the national media.
Second, Hillary is done in the democratic party. Even if she steals the nomination from Obama, she will not win the general. There is a massive grass roots movement in MD, DC, VA, NC, SC, NY, and NJ among angry black and white Obama supporters to make certain that Hillary loses all those states in the general. The media will not cover it as they focus only on Obama’s problem getting working class whites. They fail to realize the impact of 91% of black voters (who form probably at least 30 to 40% of the overall Democratic vote) staying home or voting for McCain. The buzz on black talk radio shows has been nuts!! Blacks will not vote for Hillary and she has no chance.
Third, while the media refuses to cover this story as well, Ron Paul has pulling about 25% of the Republican vote even though McCain has had the nomination wrapped up for months. Paul is planning a riot at the Republican convention and the national press has finally had to recognize the bid of Bob Barr who is seriously a threat to pull votes from McCain. Barr is the genuine article for many conservatives and had he been in the race earlier, McCain wouldn’t even be the nominee right now. You couple the influence of Barr, Alan Keyes, and possibly even Paul in the race all pulling votes from McCain in November and then tell me about who is electable.
Obama’s prospects are far better than people realize but I am happy that people are so eager to go after the “black guy” too early. You should have saved that Wright video for October. Dumb move.

Posted by: Ray | May 13, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

I am so done with you networks and Cable news channels that have the nerve to call yourselves journalists. You have done the american public a real disservice with what you call reporting. I have never been so disappointed, felt so shortchanged, as I do now. I hope you’re enjoying your cushy life, while the rest of America is SUFFERING! Suffering and in real need of a real president and instead you are talking about Obama blaming his staff!! For crying out loud– do you think that you’re untouchable? That if McCain wins in the fall only the “little people” will be affected you’re head is buried even further in the sand than it appears!!!!!
You SUCK! This article sucks! I can’t believe you think this is a critical analysis of ANYTHING. I am sure this won’t make it past your staff censors–talk about blaming your staff!
God, I am done reading your drivel.
Good LUCK!

Posted by: Lucy Mends | May 13, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Obama has copied Bill Clinton’s campaign strategy and has merged it with Karl Roves’ strategy for Bush. So much for “change”… Wonder when he’ll boot Kennedy out of Congress? Isn’t Kennedy the “old way” Obama is gonna root out and do away with? What a hypocrit. And once again, like with Bushie, the public bandwagon is going full speed ahead – right over the cliff.

Posted by: Kim | May 13, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

How does Obama’s behavior – if true – compare with one who is intentionally stoking racial fires to win at any costs when the rules she agreed to didn’t work out for her ? I remember when Bill Clinton ran for President saying he wanted to represent the people who played by the rules and deserved to enjoy the American Dream. I voted to Bill twice and have no regrets compared with the choices we had. Does Hillary play by the rules? Or just in speeches ? What all of us partisans need to see in ourselves is our own hypocrisy in blindly supporting our candidates without seeing their faults. Sure Obama has faults and is hypocritical, but he is not in the same league with his opponents, particularly his Democratic rival who should know better and whose liberal philosophy demands that she not be unjust. In our country, there is no difference between any humans when it comes to their right to be treated justly – black, white, brown, yellow, male, or female. This is where Obama stands head and shoulders above Hillary Clinton and John McCain who forget their own past behaviors, beliefs, and alliances as they accuse Mr. Obama of little more than a few real and many tenuous ‘associations’.

Posted by: Arthur Howe | May 13, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Did it ever occur to this reporter that perhaps staffmember DO make mistakes and what Obama is saying is true?

Posted by: Gretchen Wagenseller | May 14, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

I, along with many Clinton supporters (Democrats & Independents), will NEVER support Obama. We also plan to vote against any Obama superdelegate who is up for relection.
One example why: Obama stated on the stump that he has MORE foreign policy experience than Clinton or McCain because he spent his childhood in Indonesia and because he visited Pakistan during his college years. What an idiot!
He also told his supporters the night he won NC that they should not listen to statements against him. That sounded like when Jim Jones told his “flock” in Guyana before our government intervened.
Obama is a scary, leftist, clueless, messiah wannabe. I tired of hearing people being accused of being racist in the media since he started his campaign. I will not tolerate it for 4 years.
I have NEVER voted for a Republican president, I will this fall even if Hillary is Obama’s VP.
I think tonight’s WV exit polls saying that they would vote for Obama are inflated. They will go for McCain.
McCain should choose Hillary as his VP. He would win for sure! That is called “unifying the country”! Jon Stewart suggested it last week to McCain. I’ve been thinking about the same thing for 2 months.

Posted by: Susan | May 14, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Hmmm. . . attribute A FEW harmless human errors to your staff or blame every failing, mistake, and blunder of your political career on a “vast right wing conspiracy?” This article is silly.I bet if someone with absolutely no time on their hands tried, he could find 20 such statements from HRC, Barack Obama, John McCain, W, and every politician or CEO in America. Whats sad is that there are people out there who are looking for an excuse not to vote for this qualified BLACK man and this idiot columnist just gave them one.

Posted by: jonathan | May 14, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

I do think we need leaders that say the buck stops with me and actually lead, but if we are honest, which major candidate has truly exhibited that ?
This is some unobjective clap trap. All those saying his comments are too late, take a look at his recent posts. They all seem to be fairly crtitical of Obama and very few of Clinton or McCain. Let’s try and get real about this.
Obama put together a very effecient and effective campaign team while Hillary, until lately, had a chaotic campaign and strategy. CNN claimed tonight that the Clinton campaign still falls into some bad habits at times. Where is Tapper’s commentary on this ?
How can Obama be blamed for Samamatha Power’s comments ? That was her own mouth.
ABC has been very favorable to Hillary and put things in her or republican frames. When the elite/main stream media decided to destroy Howard Dean with the “Dean Scream”, after he said we needed to look at media concentration, they played that scream over 700 times in a few days. The same group tried to count how much they did loops of Rev. Wright and they stopped counting at 3000. Some favorable media there! They took no effort to put things in context or note that 20 seconds of sound bytes compared to how many thousands of hours of sermons reflected the “more onerous” views.
They also cut off the quotes at strategic points to make them seem worse.
I want a president that is accountable. So, I appreciate the report for that if it is out of the ordinary but why is this examination limited to Obama. I can make similar examples for all the remaining candidates.
I know this, the current McCain will be a disaster for the country. His plans will continue to explode the deficit. That makes everything cost more and allows the middle east and China to buy us. He believes in wide open free trade ! So, he will be more than happy to send more jobs over seas and healthcare and other company benefits will just be too expensive.

Posted by: Laber | May 14, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Jonathan, I am with you. McCain should pick Hillary as VP. My husband has been saying this for months. He says both parties would then have a 50 state strategy. The Republicans would win 50 states and the Democrats would lose 50 states.
It sure would serve the Democrats right. They are no longer my party. We plan on voting a straight Republican ticket for life – which is at least 8 Presidential election cycles plus mid-term elections.
I think a boycott of the entire party would be a great idea!
We’re signed on!

Posted by: Susan | May 14, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

You obamabots are simply delusional! I fear greatly for the future of our nation.

Posted by: specialk1216 | May 14, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am

Sorry, can’t vote for Obama. Not enough known. Can’t or won’t maintain eye contact with those he is talking to (sign of deception?) Wife very angry about “mean” America. If Obama is candidate, I will not vote for President, but will vote for others on the ballot. This way a Democratic Congress will be able to control President McCain, and put this country back on track.

Posted by: JO NEIL | May 14, 2008, 5:27 am 5:27 am

While usually I’d say that this was just silly, Obama’s ‘management style’ as he described in one of the debates does make it highly relevant. According to Obama, he has some kind of clean desk fetish — he will read one position paper, and then a staffer has to come and take that one away and give him the next one. He can’t have a pile of things he needs to read on his desk and go through them one by one…
the linearity of this process suggests tha Obama will be even more heavily reliant upon his ‘overzealous’ staff than an ordinary President — and that whoever controls the paper flow into the oval office will be running the country.

Posted by: paul_lukasiak | May 14, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Great article Jake! Thank you for doing the electorate a huge favor by helping us know who Obama is and why we should or should not vote for him in November. This is what the MSM should be doing.
Now I wonder if Obama will blame his staffers for his crushing defeat in West Virginia yesterday!

Posted by: Billy Joe | May 14, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Gosh, some fairness from the media! Thx!
Please don’t forget the BHO hypocrisy regarding the same old nasty politics of “guilt by association” that the Obama campaign claims to detest.
1. The very first response from the Obama campaign to his Jeremiah Wright scandal: Shoot out a picture as fast as possible to the media of Bill Clinton with Jeremiah Wright.
2. The very first response from the Obama campaign to his Bill Ayers scandal: Immediately question Bill Clinton’s pardons for Bill Ayer’s friends.
Thanks for this informative article. Maybe we’ll get some fair and balanced coverage yet.

Posted by: Jan | May 14, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

U.S. president Harry S. Truman had a sign with the inscription “BUCK STOPS HERE” on his desk. This was meant to indicate that he didn’t pass the buck to anyone else but accepted personal responsibility for the way the country was governed.
Should we ask less of Obama as POTUS?

Posted by: Diana | May 14, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

You folks can attack Obama all you want but he is ahead of McCain by 7 points (doing better than Hillary by the way who is leading McCain by only 4 points) and the general has not even started yet. A complete review of all the relevant data available shows a solid advantage for Obama:(read it and weap)
The simple fact of the matter is that while the media simply assumes that black voters will return to support Hillary, the vast majority will not and she will lose a large number of states she believes she has won as a result.
If Hillary would have just beaten Obama without all the cheating and race baiting (which her sore loser supporters are so willing to excuse) black voters would have returned. As it stands now, Hillary is more hated in the black community than David Duke. The media just will not cover it.
Does anyone wonder how Hillary could go from earning 54% of the black vote at the begining of this race to only holding 6% of that vote now? Did black voters not realize Obama was black at the begining of the race? Um no. They realized that Hillary was a race hustler and began jumping ship in mass numbers.
The party is split right now along racial lines and as Hillary’s folks won’t vote for Obama and Obama’s folks won’t vote for Hillary, McCain should win. If he loses, the republican party is truly dead at sea.
I quite honestly wouldn’t mind a McCain presidency if he would just change his position on Iraq (I just think its costing too much and those folks have no incentive to stand up as long as we keep footing the bill). McCain just might change his position given the fact that much of what he says now is just to woo guliable conservatives.
Obama’s clearly the better of the three but whether he wins or loses is of little matter in the grand scheme of things. People like to imagine that every presidential election “is the most important of our lifetime.” Gimmie a break. I’m far more interested in the fight between the ideologies of liberalism and conservatism and, on that front, I’m happy with what I see.
The very fact that the republican party was too chicken to nominate a real conservative (remember when Rudy pro-choice Guilliani was the frontrunner?) is essentially a concession that they did not believe a conservative could be elected. Question is: why not? They’ve had a conservative president in for two terms and he had a republican majority to work with for most of that time. So, um, where’s the beef? All of these Obama haters on here have alot to say about Wright but no defense of Bush’s unspeakable failure. Americans are done with conservatism as it relates to economics, the environment, and foreign policy. There may be some hold outs on social issues like abortion, religion, etc. but the importance of that nonsense is diminishing every day. So stop worrying so much about Obama’s staffers putting the wrong page numbers on their TPS reports people. The race for the white house is not the race to watch. The real race is the one that conservatives are losing in the long haul and so scared to talk about.
P.S. I’m watching McCain on fox right now discussing global warming…lol…he’s practically a democrat

Posted by: Ray | May 14, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The more I hear of Obama, the more I dislike him and the less I trust him. I used to think he was an empty suit, but I’ve come to believe that he’s calculated and vain. He seems to care more about him image than the work of office.
He will never get my vote. Actually, he’s starting to remind me of Bush.

Posted by: Emily | May 16, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

OTBW “Tina from Florida”, Clinton did leave a surplus…by practically shutting down the military. How “astute” was that? He was another clueless monkey completely unfit to serve as CIC of anything.

Posted by: punkindrublic | May 21, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

In my adult life, I have never seen a snake oil salesman get so close to being leader of the free world as we are now.
Obama is a dangerous, naive fool and wave after wave of sheep are following him to the cliff with great big smiles on their faces and empty eyes that can’t see the truth in front of them.
Say goodbye to your friends in Canada, Mexico, and Europe. Our agreements with them no longer matter. Say hello to your new friends in Iran, Cuba, Syria, and our buddy Hugo Chavez. Welcome Hamas with open arms.
And kiss Israel goodbye, because Obama is going to go talk to the man who says Isreal will be exterminated at least twice each week.

Posted by: Terry | May 21, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

And he’s done it again:
“Obama Says Supporters’ Anti-Israel Comments Don’t Speak for Him”
Bloomberg News, May 23

Posted by: D. Smith | May 23, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Obama Contradicts on DC Gun Ban and Still Looking for Good Help

Im going to give Sen. Obama a tiny bit of cover. I have heard him say he thinks the Second Amendment notes an individuals right to own a gun. Thats the heart of Justice Scalias majority opinion. However, in February Obama th…

Posted by: The American Mind | June 27, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

All Zero has to do is say that he made a mistake, he apaologizes, but to move on, nothing there….. and 53% of the national useful idiots say “amen”. In six months it will be another tune… buyers’ regret will be much stronger. If Europe’s demonstrations move into the USA, it will be pandemonium in the streets of NY, LA, etc. and the detention centers planned by the Zero handlers will be full… they were not really intended for the GITMO detainees. But, there will still be 53% useful idiots adoring the “idiot savant”…. and, most countries worldwide will be agin’ us….. so much for “CHANGE”.

Posted by: SCOOTER | February 3, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

What is the salary staff hire..?

Posted by: hire staff | September 8, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Obama is a scary, leftist, clueless, messiah wannabe. I tired of hearing people being accused of being racist in the media since he started his campaign. I will not tolerate it for 4 years.

Posted by: ClubPenguinCheats | July 2, 2010, 3:18 am 3:18 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.