RFK Jr. Says No One Should Be Offended
This evening Robert Kennedy Jr., who has endorsed Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., cautioned folks not to be offended at Clinton’s mention of his father’s assassination when discussing why she was staying in the race and how there was precedent for the primaries lasting until June.
In a statement, Kennedy Jr. said: “It is clear from the context that Hillary was invoking a familiar political circumstance in order to support her decision to stay in the race through June. I have heard her make this reference before, also citing her husband’s 1992 race, both of which were hard fought through June. I understand how highly charged the atmosphere is, but I think it is a mistake for people to take offense.”
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Encircled in Prayer
Boehner Slams Obama on Contraception Controversy
They don’t get it, do they ?
We are not offended because of the Kennedys. We are offended because of the Obamas.
Posted by: Benjamin | May 23, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Those who try to belittle Hillary Clinton is just trying to bring her down to the same level as Senator Obama. He has been in the sewer since he started in politics with the terrorist Bill Ayers who sponsored his political coming-out party. Then Tony Rekzo, best friend and campaigner, fund raiser and the wonderful Rev Wright, mentor and pastor have all had a hand in his campaign. Obama is a sad excuse for a politician. He has ruined the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Mary | May 23, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
I’m sorry to see RFK Jr. is still backing Clinton after all she has done to try to kill off, nearly literally, another Democrat in the race.
I’m also surprised to see he does not understand why raising the spectre of Obama being assassinated is an act of violence in itself.
Posted by: Lisa Pease | May 23, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
More OBAMA DRAMA– If Robert Kennedy Jr. isn’t upset by her comment then why would anyone else be???
Posted by: reality 80 | May 23, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Obama supporters are just using this story for their political gain. I ask Obama backers this: Are you truly offended or are using this story as a ploy to try to get her out of the race and discredit her to make sure she isn’t picked as VP?
If this story was something simliar about something Obama said he would say this is what is wrong with politics today and we are in silly season.
Posted by: David | May 23, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Anything can happen to any politician at anytime including Clinton. Obama’s or Clinton’s plane could go down, that is all she was saying. Those of you who think she said she wants Obama to be assassinated are nuts.
Posted by: Tina from Florida | May 23, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
DOESN’T HE UNDERSTAND THAT THIS WAS NOT ABOUT HIS FATHER AT ALL? VINCE FOSTERS DEATH CASE NEED TO BE REPOPENED. HILLARY MADE A FRAUDIAN GAFFE.
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 23, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
I AM AN OBAMA SUPPORTER. WHAT OF IT?
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 23, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
To Lisa Peace: This is a CONTEST just like in sports. And so a CONTEST IS A CONTEST IS A CONTEST.Have you seen any sports event where the contestants give up in the middle of a game and go home? As far as Obamas camp is concerned, I HAVE NEVER SEEN A DIRTIER CAMPAIGN CAMP EVER. Read some material at the Rezko trial and you will know who the messiah is before you glorify him.
Posted by: Starlight | May 23, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
I agree with RFK Jr .I am sure women many times have said something when they meant something else. It happens all the time . For the press to go after this shows that they have nothing to talk about.Sen Clinton never mentioned Sen Obama
Posted by: j | May 23, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
She has planted a seed more then once so now it is ok she is a good girl.She is a SICKOOOOOOOOOOOOO It is time this broad left this race she has NO chance of winning and no chance of Veep.
Posted by: older person | May 23, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
I agree with RFK Jr .I am sure women many times have said something when they meant something else. It happens all the time . For the press to go after this shows that they have nothing to talk about.Sen Clinton never mentioned Sen Obama
Posted by: j | May 23, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
RFK Jr. doesn’t get it does he. It is not about Kennedy’s assassination comment that is making us upset. It is the fact that she is putting ideas into some lunatic out there to think about carrying the assassination. The she can emerge as the Dem nominee. She is evil.
Posted by: Rose | May 23, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
With no malintent, HRC referenced an historic example poorly. In trying to game the situation, Axelrod and Co. deliberately exploited the tragedy. Is this what Unity smells like? Does Axelrod care if the Kennedys have this cycling through the news all weekend?
Posted by: Jessica | May 23, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
RFK, Jr. does not speak for me. As a woman, a black woman, I am offended on far deeper levels than RFK, Jr. can relate to.
ABC News would do itself and the public a favor if your writers would stop feeding into the hatred frenzy Hillary Clinton injects. Hillary Clinton quotes are mean-spirited. She spews hatred and divisiveness to divide and conquer for her own personal ego and gain.
An intelligent discussion could ensue should Clinton disappear from the headlines and the entire presidential race. She’s lost. Hillary’s fear-mongering and hate speech must cease.
Posted by: Don't Hate | May 23, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
if you twist it really hard, you can imagine that she was saying something about Obama.
But, then, if you twist it really hard, you can make it so that Clinton says whatever you want her to say.
That’s the beauty of being an Obama supporter. Whatever you want becomes real. YES WE CAN!
Posted by: wow...just wow | May 23, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Here’s my question to the Clinton supporters. Do you honestly feel that if senator Obama had said these same words about senator Clinton that she would not have jumped on it with the intensity and drive of destroying him? Would she not have said that he does not value her because he is wishing something terrible happens to her so he will no longer have an opponent? Your candidate made this bed long ago with her comments concerning every poorly chosen word by Obama…..you reap what you sew….
Posted by: kim | May 23, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Watch some of Obama supporters dismiss RFK’s own son now just because he has the good sense to realize this has been taken totally out of context by some in the media and Obama-partisan blogosphere.
Posted by: JD | May 23, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
KERRY….HILLARY SHOULD RUN FOR PRESIDENT OF THE LIARS CLUB…AND MCSAME SHOULD RUN FOR PRESIDENT OF A REST HOME.
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 23, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
JD..THIS WAS NOT ABOUT RFK’S FATHER.
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 23, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Hillary Clinton’s comments and behavior are similar to that of a sociopath
Just goggle “sociopath” and quickly read.
If you are not willing to at least look at both sides of an issue then you have been brainwashed and charmed by a sociopath.
I am sure you think she is the right person to be in charge of 500,000 million americans…but just to be sure keep an open mind because you cant take your vote back once its cast
Posted by: karen | May 23, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Thank you RFK Jr. Now, if only the Obama supporters would clean out their ears!
Posted by: Amy | May 23, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
“some man needs to take Hillary Clinton into a room and only he comes out.”
- Keith Olbermann
Except that was different. We really WERE talking about offing one of the candidates, instead of just making stuff up.
And, apparently, it’s okay to speak openly about murdering Clinton. But don’t talk about RFK or someone might think you’re WINKING!
Is this what the end of democracy looks like? I thought there were supposed to be Jedi Knights hanging around….
Posted by: wow...just wow | May 23, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Poor taste..
Poor judgement..
Poor choice of words..
Considering Mrs. Clinton could have used other elections that went to the convention, I’d say that her choice of words wer, well, repulsive. She is a smart woman.
I found her remarks to be more disrespectful to the Kennedy family, and Obama second. But all in all, outright rude.
When a Kennedy member NOT endorsing her can give the same comments as one that does- well….
I don’t think it will happen.
In light of recent circumstances with the Kennedy family- her comment is tasteless and rude.
PERIOD.
Posted by: Bud | May 23, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
This was NOT about RFK’s father.
It was about US. We are the
PROFESSIONAL VICTIMS OF AMERICA
and we get to interpret anything we want as somehow being
ALL
ABOUT
US!
Posted by: crybaby for prez | May 23, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
STARLIGHT..READ THE INFORMATION ON PAUL VS CLINTON and also read when she was 27 years old she was fired for lying and other illegal acts when she worked on the Watergate hearing (check it out, its in the internet). After this you will know who Hillary is before you glorify her.
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 23, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
She’s not worthy and she was never worthy.
Posted by: Madbonger | May 23, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
She is beyond shame. There is no other way to take her point except as saying, “I will hang around just in case there is a situation similar to 1968”. What this means to the Kennedys. But there is another issue and another party that is not being acknowledged: Senator Obama. This woman and her surrogates are incapable of honesty if their lives depended on it.
New Yorker should start looking for a new senator.
Posted by: nmben | May 23, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
She is beyond shame. There is no other way to take her point except as saying, “I will hang around just in case there is a situation similar to 1968”. This is deeply insensitive to the Kennedys. But there is another issue and another party that is not being acknowledged: Senator Obama and his family. She did not acknowledge it in her typical non-apology apology and statements by her surrogates. This woman and her surrogates are incapable of honesty if their lives depended on it.
Now forget a VP slot; New Yorkers should start looking for a new senator.
Posted by: nm2ben | May 23, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Obama didn’t waste anytime trying to smear her. This was obviously an historical reference. For the Obama camp to jump on this was his way of pushing her out of the VP position. Why didn’t he give her a break on this? If this is his idea of generosity, good faith and unity, then no thanks.
Posted by: rafraf | May 23, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Love her or hate her,people everywhere are fimiliar with Hillary. How much do we know about barack Obama? Not enough, and that can be extremely risky.
Posted by: brigitte | May 23, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
AVEPA….AU CONTRAIRE. It is you who need the education. I am miffed at the fact that you can not see what is as plain as the nose on your face. Hillary is definitely displaying some pathological tendencies. I pity your lack of intuitiveness. (IS THIS EDUCATED ENOUGH FOR YOU?)
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 23, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Davis,
You don’t need to start name calling because someone posts a link to Foxnews. Jeez!!! Take a look at ABCNews tonight. The first three lead stories have to do with Hillary Clinton’s statement today. A bit over the top, I would say. Inflammatory? Yes. Provocative? Yes. Irresponsible reporting? Definitely.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 23, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Stop lying Davis:
“Obama or his campaign said nothing about Hillary’s “vile” words today…”
Obama’s campaign came out immediately and tried to make an issue of it saying it had “no place” in the campaign. Looks like it backfired. Barack Obama is a DISGRACE.
We are all SO OVER the fake outrage. I can’t wait to help Obama lose either now or in November.
Posted by: Sammy | May 23, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
New Newsweek poll. Hillary beats Obama and McCain among white voters:
Obama 46
McCain 46
Clinton 48
McCain 44
Newsweek notes:
Clinton’s white support [44%] is unusually high: at a comparable point in the 2004 election, Democratic nominee John Kerry received the support of 36 percent of white voters, compared to George W. Bush’s 48 percent, and in June of 2000, Bush led Al Gore 48 percent to 39 percent.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 23, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I agree with a Mary that stated that the Obama camp is just trying to bring Hillary Clinton down to his level—the SEWER.
I don’t know one thing this corrupt politician has done that benefited the average American family, but he has sure benefitted himself with the corrupt company that he kept around.
The $200,000 gift from Rezko when he purchased his Chicago mansion is more than half of America families can afford for a home. Yet he paid no income tax on the gift. He has never told the absolute truth about anything. He is a corrupt politician who will say or do anything to win the POWER position. Send him back to corrupt Chicago. Please elect a true American, McCain or Clinton.
Posted by: Matthew | May 23, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Aw, look at the wild-eyed Obamanuts trashing RFK, Jr. for having a working brain.
Disgusting people. No wonder Hillary Clinton has won more votes.
Posted by: Kerr | May 23, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
I give Hillary the benefit of the doubt–and I’m an Obama supporter. Be shocked! Here’s the thing though–it’s been a long campaign. She’s tired. She was trying to make a point (an totally inaccurent one, but a point nonetheless). Watching her get beat up for it bothers me. I feel for her. She just spoke her point badly. Then I remember…Obama spoke his “bitter/cling” argument badly. And although he was right, she ran with it. She knew what he really meant, but it didn’t stop her from twisting and mistating what he said. So do I think she just spoke her point today in a poor way. Yes. Do I think she gets a pass on the fall out? No. Does this all make me a little sad about the state of politics? Yes. Is this why I support Obama? Yes.
Posted by: CJ | May 23, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
RFK was assassinated on the 5th of June, a little over a week from today in the calendar year. And this was only after the election in California which holds 441 delegates. If California already had their elections and Obama has an insurmountable and growing delegate lead, than what was she referencing? I can forgive her for the reference in say Febraury or March but to make this statement in the last week of May, after all the major elections, give me a BREAK!!!
Posted by: VarsityBlueNYC | May 23, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Do we really want four years of this kind of whining and race card playing and hysteria?
These Obama people are truly unhinged. My vote went to Clinton. In the event Obama is nominated, my vote will go to McCain.
You Obama freaks are ridiculous.
Posted by: Chaz | May 23, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Do we really want four years of this kind of whining and race card playing and hysteria?
These Obama people are truly unhinged. My vote went to Clinton. In the event Obama is nominated, my vote will go to McCain.
You Obama freaks are ridiculous.
Posted by: Chaz | May 23, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Barack Obama and his supporters have gone off the deep end. They’re grotesquely off their rockers and that guy is simply unfit for the US presidency.
Posted by: Jonathan Maer | May 23, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
its funny that something like this is dismissed as having little to no meaning.
Which may be the case..
but all these hillary supporters really love to bring up the “bitter” comment, and ride that pony to death…
and instead of deducing what obama meant by that comment you bash and bash and bash and call him a jerk and an elitist
i for one can see what they both meant in both cases…
although, talking about assassination is a STUPID move on her part, and this isnt the first time…
why she continues to bring this up is just stupid…she should know better
and i hope you hillary supporters can now see that if you can forgive talk of ASSASSINATION
then BITTER should be absolutely NOTHING
bad performance hillary
Posted by: bhrandon | May 23, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
The obama people and the Media are like vultures waiting for the kill -Hillary said nothing wrong nothing hurtful. She was referencing a historical point using Bobby Kennedy – Big deal- Now the Obama people will have to deal with a BACKLASH.Every day that this goes on we learn more and more about Obama and the tactics he uses, In the end Mccain will win. I have voted in many elections and always as a democrat but I will not vote for Obama – I call him the Great Divider.
Posted by: mimi362 | May 23, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Hillary Clinton Arrgh-us Leader RFK Justification For Her Continued Campaign
Clinton regrets RFK assassination remark from AP reports that Senator Hillary Clinton, in one of her less artful moments – to put it kindly – inserted the death of Senator Robert F. Kennedy as a reason, among others, for her
Posted by: PAXALLES | May 23, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
cyclops: “Keith Olbermann looked like he was going poopie…or something…in his pants tonight.
I don’t think the man is well.
My feelings exactly. I’m worried about Keith. I forced myself to watch him tonight knowing that he would go all out, but he out-outraged himself. I think he’s gone insane. The only explanation for his behavior over the past several months is that he’s been hoping for that Press Secretary job. Granted, he’s qualified. He’s as much of a delusional talking head as Dana Perino is for Bush.
Posted by: cappamore | May 24, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Cyclops 12:08:09 HAHAHAHAHA…or something. Going to google him and the “hotel room” right now.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 24, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
The media has worked long and hard to make Obama the candidate. I understand the need in news for churn on all of these online sites, but whose idea was it to float Clinton’s comment as a veiled threat against Senator Obama?? Stupid, dangerous and irresponsible. Senator Obama, I wish you and your family a happy life. I don’t want you to be President THIS TIME, and I want you to call off your dogs who are the meanest group of supporters I have ever seen. If they are a reflection of you, see ya. McCain 08
Posted by: LonghornMama | May 24, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am
“That flapping sound you hear is Hillary’s VP offer flying out the window.
Posted by: Omentum | May 24, 2008 12:17:34 AM
Good! She’s too good to be second in command to an unqualified, media-hyped candidate. I hope that offer lands in the hands of some absolutely brilliant Obama enabler like Clare “my daughter called me a slug” McCaskill.
Posted by: cappamore | May 24, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Vince Foster, Ron Brown…. about a dozen of Bill’s ex-girlfriends, sounds like a pattern developing.
Posted by: mike | May 24, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Part of the problem is that her history is not factual, but inaccurate. Note that she mentions June primaries in California — the California primary was in February this year…in 1968 and in 1992, the first primaries were held later; in 1992, the contest was essentially over after Paul Tsongas dropped out in March.
Posted by: Kate | May 24, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
YOU’VE GOT THEM GOING OMENTUM, GREAT JOB!
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 24, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
I’m so glad Keith Olbermann was offended, given Robert Kennedy Jr. the man’s son thinks this latest non-story is utterly ridiculous.
Yay, Keith once again shows his devolvement into Bill O’Reilly.Posted by: Miss Malevolent | May 24, 2008 12:20:55 AM
You got that right. He’s even now showing the same kinds of clips he accuses O’Reilly of exploiting — while spitting nails at Clinton about daring to mention the word “assassination”, he show video of the actual event. He’s clearly insane.
Posted by: cappamore | May 24, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Omentum:”Keith reminded me in that tongue beating he gave Hillary”…ugh…Don’t worry Hillary…He will be over soon…his running Countdown is at 49…48…47…46…45…try not to look at your watch…
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 24, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Interesting …. even RFK Jr. is being bashed by some for not falling into line with the Obama crowd on this. Just keep it up and see how many more Democrats will abandon the party if Obama becomes the nominee.
Posted by: Democrat52 | May 24, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
You know what’s fun about the Obamanuts?
It’s going to be delicious when patriotic Democrats to join forces with Republicans and vote for McCain in November.
We’re going to be delighted when we defeat Barry and his loud, whiny and annoying supporters.
He has united us – against him.
Posted by: Samson | May 24, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Obama people have no sense of humor. noBama was just illustrating how Obama scratches his face.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 24, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
NOBAMA…David Axelrod was on MSNBC tonight and he said that the Obama camp does NOT feel that Hillary was trying to imply anything. OBAMA’S SURROGATES AND SUPPORTERS DO NOT SPEAK FOR HIM WE HAVE OUR OWN OPINIONS.
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 24, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
RL, Olbermann reached a new low tonight. I wonder how many more Democrats he drove out the door.
Posted by: Democrat52 | May 24, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
i don’t think and really would believe that hillary would attack the kennedys. in fact, i do believe, that every word out of her mouth is attacketd by the media. whether they be for mec’can’t or obama. it seems as though everyone attacks hillary’s every move. now theyattack every word she speaks. how dare michelle obama compare herself to jackie kennedy…..how dare anyone comapare themesleves to them, be they right or wrong…..let the obmamas compare themeselves to the wright dynasty, the rattso’s, the ayers, the bittergate, the whiteygate, whatever..
Posted by: carlasue | May 24, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Kerry—
Actually, that WOULD be a dream ticket!
“IF YOU REALLY WANT CHANGE AMERICAN THEN ENCOURAGE JOHN McCAIN TO ASK HILLARY TO BE HIS RUNNING MATE. THEN WE CAN HAVE TEGETHERNESS BETWEEN THE TWO PARITES. JOHN FOR SECURITY AND HILLARY FOR THE ECONOMY. McCAIN OR CLINTON 08. NO HUSSEIN!”
Posted by: lend an ear | May 24, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
CAPPAMORE: I am well aware of the history. If I want a history lesson, I most certainly would not want Hillary to teach it to me. I would never know if she were giving me a “true” account or just mispeaking it to death.
Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 24, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
It is so sad in this world especially our country we are so opinonated that we can’t figure fact from fiction; truth from lies; and bias from non bias. Regardless of who we vote for that does not make that candidate the best one. What I do know is that God is the one who raises up leaders and brings them down. Whether you are a democrat or republican matters not. We must pray one for the other(if you are a Christian) regardless of who they are you’re praying for and who you are.
Three facts before I go:
1. No one can control anothers actions – Except God and he gives us freedom of choice.
2. The blacks in America did not all descend from Africa. Those that did after so many generation and the slave masters mixing with the slave women the products were not pure African. In addition…Indian’s were in the colonies(America)and also mixed with Black Americans… So the comment about going back to Africa is not a choice since it may not be the HOME of all Black people!
3. My opinion is Obama is the man to make the change very much needed in this Country , with God’s help! I am voting for him because I believe he is the BEST choice.
Experience, Most Electable(what a riddle). No one has experience at being a president unless he/she has served in that capacity before. It’s a hands on job and until he/she is elected there is no idea of what the job will take.
Be blessed,
The Pastor’s Wife
Posted by: The Pastor's Wife | May 24, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Davis – Keating five = acquitted McCain. Supreme Court = approval from house and congress (which no doubt, will be controlled by democrats, who will approve or not approve). Who wants an idiot who supported the californian supreme court to make gay marriage (a social issues) out of feelings and ignored the majority opposition to appoint judges?? How many times Republicans have been in contral of house, congress and presidency?? and until now Roe vs Wade is still the law. Old fool = a war hero, a survivor of car crash to power lines, airplane explosion, airplane crash and tortured as POW. Old fool = sufferred for your country, son, father and grandfather fought and died for your country.
Man, what do i have to do here to get some senses into these mindless people’s head. I think i’m giving up because they are helpless. Good luck with your lives. Try to work hard and share your pies with the Obamas. We’ll see you next 4 years or so…
Posted by: hannah | May 24, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Davis:
can you say “fear tactics”?
can you say “BOO” ?
can you say “B O” ?
can you say “Deodorant needed here?”
Posted by: pluck a lash | May 24, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Bobby was against the Mafia then, and his son is carrying on the legacy.
Nobama! Not now. Not ever……
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | May 24, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
To Davis,
No, I’m not Haggie’s wife. No arguement intended but would it make a difference if I were? I’m a Pastor’s wife who posted a comment based on my beliefs and opinion.
Posted by: The Pastor's Wife | May 24, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
It’s sad that some of the Obama supporters are so nasty and petty about Hillary’s campaign that they are pushing long time Democrats out of the party with their vicious behavior. Luckily there are mature Democrats who understand that this is an historic campaign between two well deserving candidates. They both have the support of the best Democratic leadership of our time. Obama has Senator Kennedy. Clinton has Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Martin Luther King’s son. None of these gentlemen have tried to bring down Clinton or Obama. Maybe some of Obama’s supporters should get a clue!
Posted by: Wiseguy | May 24, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
omentume, with all due respect sir, hillary is staying in the race because so many people love her and will vote for her no matter what….i will tell you and all something very honestly….i believe in truth, and every politician has their share of lies, clinton, mc’can’t and even obama. i mean look at the rev wrong and rattso and ayers, and the rest. i am by no means a racist like i have been previously called. i have many, many AA friends. they love me dearly and would defend me to the end. and i would the same for them. i just want freedom for all, equality for all, equal pay for all, and a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work…what the hell does that tell you…
Posted by: carlasue | May 24, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Omentum 12:19:06…As in the monkey? You opened the door on that one.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 24, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
davis, if you have such an itch, then maybe you should scratch it…
Posted by: carla sue | May 24, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am
davis, with respect sir, what is this crap about roe v wade?? and if it is up for debate or what. a woman shall have and will have the right to choose. we shall not be overcome, destroyed, manipulaited, controlled, or bossed around by some idiot man. our bodies are our own, and we shall be the ones to head them up. and yes, i am married…and yes, i am a staunch dem.
Posted by: carlasue | May 24, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
Olbermann has lost his mind. Both RFK Jr. and David Axelrod, Obama’s campaign
manager,said that Hillary meant no harm. But Olbermann exploited the issue and has whipped the Obamapaths into a frenzy.
The media is just trying any desperate measure to get Hillary to drop out.
Posted by: Karen | May 24, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Besides disenfranchise millions of voters─ there are things about Barack Obama that’s eerily reminiscent of George Bush.I am pretty certain that if elected president Sen. Barack Obama is going to be even worse than George W. Bush!
Our media is cheering for Sen. Obama, just like the media called George Bush the “the great uniter” circa Florida 2000! Obama lawyers successfully blocked Michigan and Florida re-votes! You will notice that Sen. Obama has lot of George Bush in him! Remember the media talking heads asking Al Gore to do the “noble thing” just like Obama supporters and media people asking Hillary Clinton to “drop out” of the race─ even when it wasn’t half way over. Sen. Obama also makes gaffs just like George W. Bush; which typical of a fumbling politician. I am sure Sen. Barack Obama is a liberal incarnation of George Bush. These gaffes are becoming a part of his political persona.
“We should be sending Arab specking interpreters to Afghanistan!”
This shows Sen. Obama’s utter ignorance of the Middle East and the Islamic world. (Afghans don’t speak Arabic!) Are we really going to hand him the power to direct our foreign policy, with two wars raging in Iraq and Afghanistan, to such an ignoramus, especially after all the damage and devastation done by Mr. George Bush?
And in the same breath he said he made another gaffe about “Agricultural experts in Afghanistan.”
“I’ve been to all 57 states…”
“100 million dies in Myanmar!”
“She was punished with a baby…!”
And he called a news reporter, “Sweetie!”
Then while he campaigning in Oregon, a woman asked him what he thought of the situation with Hanford Nuclear Site. This is a real big deal for us those of us who live in the Pacific Northwest. He was completely stumped! He didn’t know what Hanford Nuclear Facility was! This is shocking! This is utter ignorance. This is big red flag! This sort of thing about Obama makes me cringe! I am certain that he isn’t qualified to be our next commander- in-chief!
Barack Obama is no JFK or MLK! He’s lot like George Bush.
If elected president, Barack Obama could even be worse than George Bush…
Posted by: Portlanddem2 | May 24, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
davis, shame on you…i don’t command a national audience sir…i don’t command anything…i just let freedom ring, as in freedom of speech, just as you have excercised over the last several weeks. shame on you sir…you have gone beyond the logic of the democratic race. i guess i shall now call you a mc’cant supporter. even tho i love hillary, and you supposedly love obama, i see you now as a republican, for bashing me so badly…
Posted by: carlasue | May 24, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am
The 1968 primary began March 12th. Robert F. Kennedy was shot June 5th and died on June 6th, 1968. I would not call less than 2 months a hard fought race. Also, the 1992 primary started on February 18th and Bill Clinton had the nomination wrapped up after he won the New York primary in early April. Again, I don’t think a little over 2 months should be considered a hard fought race.
I’m a little surprised at his statement. What the heck is going on! IMHO, it was a clear attempt on Clinton’s part to plant the idea. There are plenty of examples of hard fought races in both parties that continued up until the convention. She could have used one of those.
Posted by: Cindy | May 24, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Oops, my bad. March 12th – June 6th = a little over 2 months.
Posted by: Cindy | May 24, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Clinton just expressed an unconscious wish…As well as spreading the lie that she is being robbed the election when in reality she is trying to steal it from Barack.
But nobody should think wrong of her…or from CAIN’s pastors…or CAIN’s nasty words…or from Huckubee’s gunshot on Obama…
Since they are all white, we should consider that all they have is good intentions….
On the other side: Obama, Wright and Michelle’s words should be taken seriously and believe they were taken in context and purposely spoken…because they are not like us…right?
Posted by: Alma | May 24, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Actually, the person that has been knock off by men is Mrs. Hillary Clinton. The media have killed her character MSNBC and CNN need to be taken off of the air. They will turn this country into a civil war. Just like they did when they shoved the war in Iraq in our throats. We should turn ourselves not against each other but against the media people for dividing the Democratic party so Mr. McCain can win. They alone are responsible and accountable for the millions of innocent people that have died in Iraq, how can they live when they know better they contributed to the killing of thousands of people. Now they are turning race against race. Voltaire said. “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities”. The media don’t want the best for this country at all, they only care about money and ratings. Almost everything you hear are lies,or twisted truths. They are already insinuating an assassination on Mr. Obama, that way it will make headline news and their ratings will skyrocket. If they were true believers in Mr. Obama they would have supress those news the way they supress the truth in other things, but instead it is a great opportunity to send a message to any sick person and have their desire met.
Posted by: alice newton | May 24, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Actually, the person that has been knock off by men is Mrs. Hillary Clinton. The media have killed her character MSNBC and CNN need to be taken off of the air. They will turn this country into a civil war. Just like they did when they shoved the war in Iraq in our throats. We should turn ourselves not against each other but against the media people for dividing the Democratic party so Mr. McCain can win. They alone are responsible and accountable for the millions of innocent people that have died in Iraq, how can they live when they know better they contributed to the killing of thousands of people. Now they are turning race against race. Voltaire said. “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities”. The media don’t want the best for this country at all, they only care about money and ratings. Almost everything you hear are lies,or twisted truths. They are already insinuating an assassination on Mr. Obama, that way it will make headline news and their ratings will skyrocket. If they were true believers in Mr. Obama they would have supress those news the way they supress the truth in other things, but instead it is a great opportunity to send a message to any sick person and have their desire met.
Posted by: alice newton | May 24, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
Actually, the person that has been knock off by men is Mrs. Hillary Clinton. The media have killed her character MSNBC and CNN need to be taken off of the air. They will turn this country into a civil war. Just like they did when they shoved the war in Iraq in our throats. We should turn ourselves not against each other but against the media people for dividing the Democratic party so Mr. McCain can win. They alone are responsible and accountable for the millions of innocent people that have died in Iraq, how can they live when they know better they contributed to the killing of thousands of people. Now they are turning race against race. Voltaire said. “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities”. The media don’t want the best for this country at all, they only care about money and ratings. Almost everything you hear are lies,or twisted truths. They are already insinuating an assassination on Mr. Obama, that way it will make headline news and their ratings will skyrocket. If they were true believers in Mr. Obama they would have supress those news the way they supress the truth in other things, but instead it is a great opportunity to send a message to any sick person and have their desire met.
Posted by: alice newton | May 24, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am
truthfully everyone, i would like to see someone represent persons of all ages, color, creeds, and religions. and then most of all represent someone who gives a fair day’s work for a fair day’s wage. raise the min wage again. vote more $$$ for union workers. god bless america.
Posted by: carlasue | May 24, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
You know…I’d like ot know what Olbermann has done for the black community.
I’m guessing nothing outside of announcing when someone’s made a dunk over someone else’s head.
Hillary was out registering black people to vote and being an activist probably while he was crapping in his diapers.
Yet he calls her racist. He says she’s trying to kill Obama.
And the bleeting masses get behind this ridiculous thinking because it suits their purposes to demonize this woman to uplift that guy.
It all smack of the same thing that happened with Bush. Even down to the three word sloganizing. “Yes, America Can”.
Hmm…Yes, American Can…Yes, We can.
Bush didn’t know the difference between Sunni and Shia…Obama doesn’t know the difference between Farsi and Arabic.
And yet…these things take a back seat to making up utter lies about a woman who has devoted her life’s work to helping others.
Wow. You know…American deserves the leaders she has right now. Rome is burning people, and you’re the ones adding the kindling.
Posted by: Miss Malevolent | May 24, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am
ok davis, i understand what you are saying….i raised two children by myself..one boy, one girl. did it alone dude…and it was hard as hell. listen friend, if you don’t want your children to see things on tv, then turn it off…play board games…i am now a grandmother, and am not into fighting with people on line….am into just taling and reasonging. i understand your frustration sir. especially raising children in this day and age. as i said earlier…..i did it alone, with no help. just hope. i am for the working man, the middle class, and yes, i don’t have a hell of a lot of education……but that does not make me hateful or an idiot….just makes me someone who loves life, their children, their grandchildren, their late parents, and those who serve our country…..and no sir, i do not want mc’can’t as the prez…….i just truly want the dems to unite….unite….unite….as my late father represented when he was alive….i so want that for my children and grandchildren…i believe you want the same…
Posted by: carlasue | May 24, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Historical reference point. A horrible, terrible event in American history. How anyone could think that Clinton is somehow trying to use RFK’s assassination for political gain is sick. The Clintons have always made it clear that perhaps the biggest influence on their lives was the call to public service and the inspiration of the Kennedys. This is as bad as implying the Clintons are racist. Absolutely, positively the most ridiculous interpretation I have ever heard!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 24, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am
Obama needs to grow up politically. His talking has not convinced me he is a strong candidate. Actions, experience, & world interactions are evident with Hillary. SHE IS THE STRONG CANDIDATE. Barak should return to his senatorship and wait for a while to prove his worth as a potential candidate, not because he has the “high school image popularity vote.”
Posted by: Letty | May 24, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am
This sets up a perfect context for Obama to hire someone to hurt him SLIGHTLY but not endanger his life. Then he can blame Hillary for trying to kill him. He wins the nomination.
Then at the end of October just before the election, he will try the trick again. Then he will blame John McCain for trying to kill him. The he wins the presidency.
How smart! A Harvard trained lawyer!
Posted by: Brent | May 24, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am
1/2 of the Democratic party want Obama. Good luck with the rest of the voting public.
Posted by: Mack | May 24, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am
hi everyone again…god bless and goodnite. let us not be filled with hate, bigotry, bias, but filled with love, peace and hope. yes, long live the 60′s and the 70′s. if you want to talk to me again, i will check in tomorrow. god bless you all, regardless of our beliefs politically.
Posted by: carlasue | May 24, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am
BO supporters want their projections to be real. Jump and raise even more dirt and dust which are their own platform of virtual reality. They have projected so much negative on HC and this shows that they don’t miss any opportunity to feed into their junk yard.
It’s not enough that RFK said that “there is mistake for people to take offense”.
You think because you project something and want it to be real is enough to make it real?
The real divide line between HC supporters and BO supporters is : VIRTUALITY versus SUBTANTUALITY.
HC may not be perfect, but she addresses substance. When BO addresses hope and change , people ask where were you trained, to carry out realization, finally it has been admitted that his substantial training was his 20 years link with Rev. Wright. And no wonder why many people prefer to trust HC. Yet those voters are called racist. If race was a dividing factor within the american society for so many years, if you want to carry out unity, never use it the way it has been throughout the primaries contests.
Many black artists, actors what have you show their talent as a healing factor. To shut up some real facts like someone saying it takes courage to fight and speak for equality, it also takes progressive action to pass laws for equality, and declare this is racist is not going to help. Don’t turn everything into negative, because it is negative to always react negatively.
So listen to RFK, everything is fine under the american sky.
Posted by: jane | May 24, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am
Brent,
I’m not at all impressed by Obama’s academic achievements. For one thing, BO & his wife were afforded the luxury of 230 points added to their SAT because of AA to get into an Ivy League school. I didn’t get that luxury. Maybe that’s why I didn’t get in. I wouldn’t be so proud if I were them. It’s pretty much points out that you must be too dumb that you need to be given the extra 230 points before you even take the SAT!!
Posted by: neil1785 | May 24, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am
Re: “For one thing, BO & his wife were afforded the luxury of 230 points added to their SAT because of AA to get into an Ivy League school.”
That’s not true. Nobody is given extra points on their SAT for being black. You didn’t get in to an Ivy League school because you make dumb comments such as this one.
Posted by: Kelly | May 24, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am
The promotion of this non-issue is such a transparent grasping at straws to drive Hillary from the race. I have no doubt that it will backfire on the Obama camp and the media that has promoted it. The Hillary hate promoted by the media and Obama supporters is far more of a public safety threat than anything I have ever heard uttered by Hillary!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 24, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am
What a bizarre frenzied state of mind Obama supporters must be in. But it’s not mysterious. The Obama camp is deliberately twisting Hillary’s comment out of context to excite emotional outrage over a red herring issue.
You’d have to have the reading comprehension of a mollusk – or have a seriously distorting emotional agenda – to so blindly take Hillary’s pointing to a historical event as anything other than that. The hyporcisy and violence of the Obama camp astonishes me.
So many Obamabots have become mindless, dangerous religious zealots over Obama. And I suppose that’s all you can “cling” to because the man has no experience, no substance, and evidently no integrity.
Posted by: Torch | May 24, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am
Lisa Pease, you wrote:
“I’m sorry to see RFK Jr. is still backing Clinton after all she has done to try to kill off, nearly literally, another Democrat in the race.”
What the hell are you talking about? Hillary and her campaign haven’t tried to shut Obama up, squash his hopes and get him out of the race at ever primary! Obama has done that to Hillary. Mr. Hope and belief has done nothing but tell Hillary “no you can’t” -despite how much smarter and more successful Hillary is than Barack.
Trust me, Obama is responsible for any negativity that came to him. He has a terrible and hypocritcal voting record, a history of weakness and very few accomplishments. His closest friends, mentors and allies have been extremist anti white, anti Jew, and anti gay individuals and groups. He says he’s for the people and environment but voted for Cheney’s corrupt 2005 energy bill which resulted in 55 billion dollars in tax breaks to the oil companies and striped away environmental protections – which one of his biggest backers – Exelon – just loved.
Obama has encountered peril because of his own choices and mistakes. A lot of people take the time to actually study his actions, and those who do see right through him.
It is the height of emotional blindness and or immaturity for you to come to “poor little Obama’s” rescue. Don’t you want a president who takes responsibility for his own mistakes?
You should be very frightened by your own words.
Posted by: Torch | May 24, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am
For those who don’t believe in polls that show only IDIOTS vote for Clinton — look no further than the comments in this blog. I could care less if you won’t vote for Obama in the general — go vote for McCain and enjoy the next 4 years knowing you got “revenge” like the good Christians you claim to be. If I ran this country, I wouldn’t let the uneducated vote and weigh down the system by electing George Bushes and John McCains — this is one of the great weaknesses of Democracy that has held us back for years, and it’s time to take the problem head on.
Posted by: Jane | May 24, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
She plans to kill him and is just setting the stage. Stuff all over the internet indicate people have died mysteriously during the Clinton administration in Arkansas and in the White house, e.g. Vincent Foster on the eve of his resignation and during the White Water Scandal. It is time America woke up to what the Clintons are – the rest of the world knows.
Posted by: sandra | May 24, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Surprise surprise — Hillary’s claim that the elections always run into June is just another flat out lie. Bill had the election wrapped up in February, at a time when states weren’t moving their primary dates to earlier dates like they do today. Just another one to add to the other 100 lies Clinton has told and now believes. If she were honest every once in a while, I might actually support her.
Posted by: Megan | May 24, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am
Mimi, you’re so right. But this isn’t new. The sexist, Obama adoring press – with generous nudges from the Obama campaign – have been incessantly trying to pronounce Hillary out of the race. This is an old Obama strategy. It’s how he won in Illinois. He simply bullied his opponents out of the race with every specious and false attack he could contrive, so that he was the only choice, long before the people could really evaluate him. Obama is a fraud. And is urgency to get Hillary out is because the more time passes, it’s inevitble we’ll discover just how empty, corrupt, and fraudulent he is.
Go Hillary!
Posted by: Torch | May 24, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am
what is beyond understanding is that the bho supporters, most of which are black, loathe the clintons. how quickly they forget haow they stood up for them AND how many millions and millions of dollars bill’s charity has raised and sent to africa. i wish he would cut them off and send the money to a group that appreciates him. but he is above that and will continue on with his cause.
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am
Posted by: Davis | May 24, 2008 4:52:15 AM
read bho books, and listen to michelle if you want “racist”.
bho could ask hillary to be vp, and i still would not vote bho in as president.
never, no way. get a grip, regardless of ANYTHING, many hillary voters will NOT VOTE BHO. and he NEEDS us to win.
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am
Jane, I agree with you ! It sounds terrible, but it would work better !
Posted by: Sabine H. | May 24, 2008, 5:25 am 5:25 am
I am WHITE. I used to think I was middle class, now I am pretty sure the Bush administration classifies me as something much below that. I am a business owner, I have a mortgaged house, a financed car, other debt and no medical insurance due to its high cost and the roller coaster of owning a small business. I am a White American. I reside in South Florida. I am a former Kerry/Edwards Supporter. I was an Edwards supporter and am now an Obama supporter. I am intelligent, thoughtful, trustworthy, honest, civic minded,a Democrat AND I am Jewish. There are many of us who, like me are supporters of Senator Obama. We believe that our Governor (the probable republican veep-nominee) orchestrated the latest election debacle in our state. Sound familiar? The insensitive remarks of Sen. Clinton were an abomination. I completely agree with some press that using the A word at all in THIS America is tantamount to inviting it to become a reality. Anyone who who expresses the thought that Obama supporters are naive or worse should have their own heads and hearts examined. This country needs FRESH, it needs fresh and not a repetition of any previously tried political contender regardless of a previous familial record. Why can’t the elitists just stand down and let another contender enter the ring?
Oh, that’s right, they are who they are and could never stomach sharing the crown with “one of us”.
Posted by: BD | May 24, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am
Posted by: BD | May 24, 2008 5:43:45 AM
the elitists are the ones who have pushed bho to the point where he is. the elitists are bho and his supporters. the party elders have also turned their collective backs on hillary.you can go for “hope”(which is a feeling, not action), we choose to go with the candidate we feel most able to run the country-hillary.
and, he is in the ring.
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am
“The only people that care about this remark, are kool-aid drinkers, Anderson Cooper and friends at CNN.
Posted by: Mack | May 24, 2008 2:39:40 AM”
Exactly.
Posted by: 57 states and counting | May 24, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am
Obama’s camp is so thin skinned that they get whipped up over anything. Now I can see the Obama camp staging a fake attempt on BHO to gain sympathy.
- A McCain Democrat
Posted by: vs | May 24, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am
It certainly isn’t an image I would use to justify staying in the Race; nor is it an image that I as a voter would see as being positive or progressive.
I think she has diced this campaign, until it has become sludge.
Posted by: Thinking | May 24, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am
Posted by: maria | May 24, 2008 7:19:50 AM
if hillary goes down, you go down as her supporters will vote mccain, then you loose.
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am
you talk “junk” about hillary, you talk “junk” about us. we will vote mccain. sure hope no bho supporter even suggests that this”lying, sinister, offensive woman,” should campaign for him!!!
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am
It seems odd at best ti even mention RFK and the 1968 Campaign as lasting until June as justification. In 1968 the First Primary was NH and it was held in March. Nixon didn’t even enter the race until Feb.
These primaries were not even on the same schedule as today
Posted by: Thinking | May 24, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am
So… why exactly did Clinton HAVE to mention assassination to make the point that sometimes campaigns run until June?
Oh… she didn’t. Mentioning the 1968 campaign is a stretch to start off with given Kennedy only entered that race on March 16th – this year’s campaign had already been going for over two months by March 16th! But if the point is purely that ‘sometimes campaigns go on until June’ there is absolutely no need to mention the assassination of RFK. It has no relevance to that point, and, given America’s long and unhappy history of political assassinations, it is extremely unwise to do so.
So at the end of the day, you’ve only got two possibilities: Clinton is foolish, or Clinton is evil. Which is it?
Posted by: Aengil | May 24, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
so the kennedy family are not offended, and see this as it was meant. just referencing the month of june.
the sun is shining in my part of the country, but it is a dark dark day in this country this am.
for any thinking rational american citizen can really see now just how the so called american media-has let the american people down.
these people get paid a lot of money to do what they do, they all have health insurance, all able to educate their children. and they can lead people into a frenzy trying to destroy this woman.
it is a shame. it would not matter on this issue if this were done to obama or mccain, i would not read into it what has been read into it. and i would still be speaking out on the wrongness of it. you people who are saying all of these negative things should be ashamed of yourselves-i hope none of you have children listening to you rant about this, and then they can go back and hear this or read what sen. clinton really said. and then tell you, “Mom/Dad
I don’t think that is what she meant at all”
I did not watch any of the news programs last night, and did not miss any of it. i usually watch cspan in the am but not when the guy who is on there today is on. he should be on a network, he is so biased against sen. clinton.
now the person who really makes gaffe’
all the time is obama
saying kentucky was close to arkansas.
saying there were 10k people killed in a tornado-when the death toll was 12,
saying on the 18th iran was a little country with a little military budget
and poses no threat to us at all
and then on the 19th saying the threat iran poses to the usa is grave.
saying the great lakes were in oregon.
and the list goes on and on.
I will be glad when june 3rd, (oh my god sen. clinton is right there are democratic primaries in JUNE 2008,
just as there was in JUNE 1992, and JUNE 1968,-remember folks it was JUNE 1968-RFK HAD JUST WON THE CALIFORNIA PRIMARIES AND HE WAS KILLED-JUNE 1968
that is all the woman was saying.
the media
bill burton of the obama team
the obama supporters
and anyone else who is trying to read all of the stuff into this other than what it was
it is just an example of how the low-class chooses to stay on the low-road.
it is shameful.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
Too all you Obama supporters : making a case about an innocent comment is ludicrous. GET A LIFE !
Posted by: Paulus | May 24, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
Posted by: Aengil | May 24, 2008 7:54:09 AM
possibility three…you haven’t a clue.
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Posted by: Aengil | May 24, 2008 7:54:09 AM
if you think hillary is foolish or evil, then i guess you do not want her to campaign for bho, and do not want her supporters to vote for him since we are stupid as to support her? good luck!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Well RFK Jr I am not offended, I just think it was an ridiculous analogy. Certainly not one used for the unity of the country.
Posted by: Thinking | May 24, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
Obama should be, and would rightly be, offended…And no apology has been made to him. And what about those African Americans who have secretly been so worried about the possibility of the tragically unthinkable…And Hillary, what message does this send to your supporters?
Posted by: LouiseS | May 24, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Sorry I am deeply offended! This man had secret service protection early in the race. Hillary doesn’t misspeak, she says what she means, and means what she says until she catches heat! She is a very careful and deliberate speaker. Bobby Kennedy, Jr. is a Hillary supporter I am sure he spoke privately to her about that unconscionable statement and reamed her over the coals. So say what you want it is an offensive statement and it is not the first time she mentioned it. To imply she is staying in the race because he may get killed sorry people it is reckless. She owes the Obamas an apology without a doubt! Now let’s reverse the script…If Obama said that, oh my God! The media blitz from the press and the Clintons would have pushed him straight out of the race. Unfortunately race does matter in what is appropriate to do and say in this national race. So it is not a Obama supporter thing versus the Clinton supporters. It was reckless, reprehensible and irresponsible. Sounds like more Bush politics. I said it but no one should be offended and if anyone was then I apologize? Another Clinton nonapology! Looking into millions of televisions sets: I did not have sex with that woman…Monica Lewinsky! America had to define it’s definition of what is sex because of the former President, who by the way is also running. Dammit just apologize for once directly and be done with it. Because believe it or not, unless your pigmentation is darker, it usually yields broad spread forgiveness. I think if Hillary would for once give a sincere, heartfelt apology it would be a nonissue possibly!
Posted by: Audrey | May 24, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am
i do believe the dnc, and the obama supporting media now know that obama will not win the white house no matter how they spin it now.
this is good, sen. clinton,nor bill or any of the clinton supporters will not feel inclined to campaign for obama.
you may call them stupid, evil and all of those other things, but the clintons and terry mcc.,paul b., james c. and a whole host of others will not campaign for obama. someone in the obama camp should have told him-THEY NEED THESE DEMS.
take heart middle of the road clinton supporters, (stop watching the msm)
and know there is no way obama will win the white house, nor should he.
get batten down the hatch, get your affairs in order, try to be as self sufficent as possible.-(since you are not going to watch the msm-plant a veggie garden!-get yourselves a bike and get some exercise)
and get ready to ride out the mccain presidency.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
Why are people so offended. If anybody with an ounce of sense can read what she said it didn’t have anything to do with Obama. I have even read that people think its code for somebody to do it. Get real people!
She was making a comparison to Bill and RFK’s candidacy running into June. For the media to blow this out of proportion is utterly disgusting. If RFK’s own son is not offended why should anybody else be. Shows how stupid and moronic our media has become and you Obama sheeples are right there on the bus with them.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
pp: “possibility three…you haven’t a clue.”
Always a possibility! But unless you can provide an actual justification for why it was a good thing to refer to RFK’s assassination, it seems less likely that the two possibilities I put forward…
Posted by: Aengil | May 24, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Why should she apologize to Obama? I’ve read that several times. Where did she even mention the twit.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
Excuse me, Mr. Hillary Supporter — I’m not offended for the Kennedys. I’m appalled for the obvious implication of the statement, i.e. what would be in it for her if Obama were to be, say assassinated. To plant the suggestion in that context, whether intentional or subliminal, is ugly. There are somethings one does not say outloud and I expect anyone who thinks they can be a great leader to know it. We already have Bush running around like a loose canon with his foot permanently implanted in his mouth, constantly trying to convince the gullible that he didn’t mean this or he didn’t mean that.
Posted by: Sara B. | May 24, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
The thing here is that she has said this more than once. For someone who is supposed to be so intelligent should know better. She could have used another analogy, but this one. This is sick and twisted. There are no excuses about what she said. As for RFK, Jr., I dont’ get it. How can you justify her words? I can only imagine that the rest of your family don’t feel the same. She is truly desperate and feels that Barack has taken her throne away. She mentions why he can’t seal the deal, and my question to her is why can’t you!
Posted by: Roslyn | May 24, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
gregory,
why should they? the obamas’ don’t want their support.
why should the obama’ want sen clinton to campaign for them.
michelle said she would have to think long and hard about campaigning for sen. clinton, if she had become the nominee.
so i ask you gregory, why should the obamas want the clintons to campaign for them?
please gregory, you tell me.
i as this question of obama supporters all the time and the answer comes back
______.
why should barack obama want or let sen. clinton campaign for him?
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
and the lone Kennedy family member supporting Hillary is ask for an opinion…imagine that LOL I would BET that Ted Kennedy has a differing take on it.
The witch has thrown water on herself.
Posted by: Brian | May 24, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
Jane wrote this, “If I ran this country, I wouldn’t let the uneducated vote and weigh down the system by electing George Bushes and John McCains — this is one of the great weaknesses of Democracy that has held us back for years, and it’s time to take the problem head on.”
She is an excellent example of a politically correct elitist IDIOT. What she describes is called a “DICTATORSHIP” with her in charge. Thank God for the “uneducated”!
Posted by: Tim | May 24, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
and by the way gregory,
i am enough of a world citizen to know in our american school we did not learn to spell CHECK- the way YOU spell it.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
gregory,
one of the very reasons i will not watch the tv news. and you should not believe anything you hear on CNN.
they will say anything on tv on cnn.
and yes, i guess the clintons can take
a HOLIDAY anywhere they want.
but i do know they love VACATIONING IN ENGLAND and canada, i don’t know if they have been to aussieland on vacation.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Yea there is no comparison between Cling and Assassination. Everyone here knows that cling is not PC. Whereas Assassination is something we use in every Presidential Campaign.
What’s the big deal here, Obama used Cling!!!!!!!
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 24, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
harriet,
why should the obama want sen clinton campaigning for them?
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Phoenix Bird: If one wants fuel for their fire, just publish the logos that one wears on his or her lapels. Hilarity wears the Phoenix Bird.
P.S. Elections are not won from the investigation of the facts, only Emotions and high drama, and anything but the truth. Elijah:
Posted by: Denton Brunken | May 24, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
i wonder if any of the media who sat down to report this yestday, stopped to think once in their minds, “this is such a non story-anybody with half a brain can see what she meant-but this is how i get paid so-here goes”
but i do think some in the msm really thought a kennedy would lowrate themselves to support this kind of story.
the kennedy’s are to intellegent and high classed to support such foolishiness.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Was Hillary making an innocent comparison or is she giving Arthur Bremer, who was paroled recently, types something to think about?
If anything was to happen to Obama everyone would blame you know who.
Posted by: Richard | May 24, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
you see msm this is what you get for trying to make something out of nothing.
comments like richards.
if any one cared to they could go back and read some of the comments made over the course of this campaign and see who the real danger is to. sen. clinton.
sen. clinton has a long and good public service record-and HAS worked hard to try and level the playing field for the poor and middle class. you can discount and deny it all you want, but the record stands and will always.no matter what you obama supporters say.
and the shame is you don’t have much of a record to put up of obama’s.
according to the comments it is sen. clinton who should be worried.
say and make up all the negative things you want about sen. clinton
but the record stands-sen. clinton has done a lot of good for the poor and middle class.
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
i have heard obama supporters on tv. say sen. clinton will campaign for obama.
why would the obama or obama supports want sen. clinton to campaign for him?
Posted by: worldcitizen | May 24, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Totally innocent reference(s) to RFK 1968, shes only made similar comments three times already while campaigning.
Just like when she was asked if she believed Obama was a Muslim Hillary answered: “No. No, there is nothing to base that on. AS FAR AS I KNOW”
I believe her, her integrity is unquestionable. Shes like a sunny day in Bosnia…
Posted by: Richard | May 24, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Richard,
Were you in diapers in 1968? What she is stating is FACT. Unfortunately RFK was assassinated. What she was referring to was he was still in the race IN JUNE.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
the dem party that has vocally and tacitly suppoted bho, their affirmative action experiment, will make sure bho gets the nomination.
what they cannot assure, is how people will vote, and what the rep. will throw at him.
Mccain wins big-2008
bho gone from political scene-2008
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Sorry Charlie not all Obama supporters fit that demographic. Just smart enough to see her for what she really is.
A calculating opportunist, and not a very good one at that, who will say anything to win.
You think she moved to New York for the mild winters?
Posted by: Richard | May 24, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Richard,
“Sorry Charlie not all Obama supporters fit that demographic. Just smart enough to see her for what she really is.”
———————
But not smart enough to comprehend what she said.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
I’m somewhat pleased that Hillary raised the specter of assassination because this effectively ends the talk of her being the VP. I believe this woman could have Obama killed which is to say that I put nothing past her. There are other qualified woman out there who could be the VP. It does not have to be Hillary and after this, it won’t be.
Posted by: Alex | May 24, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Posted by: Alex | May 24, 2008 9:50:13 AM
i do not know of, nor have i read a post by a hillary supporter that says we WANT her to be bho’s vp.no one i know will vote for bho with or wothout hillary. the key is we do not want bho as president regardless.
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
alex,
the only people who are in any real danger are the people who walk and talk with you daily.
i wish someone who knows you well could read what you just wrote.
Posted by: shameonyou | May 24, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Alex,
“I’m somewhat pleased that Hillary raised the specter of assassination”———
Where did she say this? Please cite a source.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
cry baby bama,
do not dispair,
obama will not be president.
even with all of the help he has been given.
the dem party as we have known it is finished.
by the time of the next election there will be another viable third party
some where from the middle. a moderate dem. party.
we may not be able to have bought ourselves a tv station or a newspaper.
but we will beat the next dem or rep who runs for office.
the british have done it. and it is time for the americans to do it also.
so no more screaming all cap writing.
obama will not win.
the very best of this for me, IS the fact that sen. clinton will be able to go back to her day job. and not campaign for obama.
michelle obama said she would not want to campaign for sen. clinton. and now sen. clinton does not have to feel obliged to campaign for him.
he will lose and the dnc, the msm will have no one to blame but obama.
so i am glad she will not campaign for him.
why should obama want sen. clinton to campaign for him?
Posted by: shameonyou | May 24, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
RFK Jr. is right and the Obama advisers should lay off this one. It is ridiculous.
However, Clinton said something else in the same interview that is worth taking issue with: “I’m ahead in the popular vote.”
Short answer: No you’re not.
There is no such thing as an actual vote count, only estimates, and even in those, Obama is ahead. Unless of course you defy party rules and count FL and MI, while at the same time ignoring states without any popular vote count + the fact that a caucus state produces only a fraction of a primary states voter turn-out. Then and only then, Clinton sqeezed ahead by a 0.45% margin.
The sole purpose of a popular vote count is to measure the will of the people, and the number that Clinton uses does not meet that basic criteria.
Clinton is close and should be credited for that. But she is not ahead.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | May 24, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Why are all the Hillary supporters so touchy?
I mean shes just being honest, its her best quality: her honesty and her integrity. It goes well with her victim status. The media is out to get her, its sexism, its the corrupt caucus system…
But shes a fighter, she won’t quit till everyone has their voice heard, shes all about justice.
I’m not really sure if I want to identify with what has happened to her campaign. She was not just the front runner; she was the nominee in waiting and to put it bluntly she blew it. ( won’t add anything to that ).
Her supporters need to get over it. In this instance the dream died and it wasn’t pretty.
Posted by: Richard | May 24, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Hillary or Mccain never Obama I don’t like the hateful supporters that he has
Posted by: Bishop | May 24, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
we will see just how strong obama and his supporters constitution is once sen. clinton is out.
and we will see once obama loses in nov.
just how loud they will cry foul.
obama will not be POTUS,
he is not qualified.
Posted by: shameonyou | May 24, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
As much as I used to like the Democrats, I may sit this one out or vote Republican for the first time. I do not like the direction the democrats are going.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
California Voter,
RFK’s own son put this in the exact right context. Yet you would spin it differently, but only for nefarious purposes. Is there anything that Obama and company will not seize politically? If you stop drinking the coolaid long enough to where you can come out of the daze you will be the first to admit that Obama is all about politics as usual, surrounded by the same usual suspects, all from Washington, paid for by the same lobbyists. That old line that he doesn’t take money from lobbyists, that’s been disproven. Fact is he takes money from everybody and this thing is a big charade. Obama is interested in one thing and one thing only, Obama wants to see Obama get paid!
========================================
It’s Obama’s turn to get paid!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 24, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
“There is nothing wrong with pointing to a historical event to remind people that the primaries were still in full contest in June 1968, when RFK was assassinated?”
There is something wrong with that actually. Firstly, it’s a bad example – RFK entered the race on March 16th. The Democratic primaries had already been running for over two months by March 16th this year. Secondly, there’s no need to refer to RFK’s assassination to make that point.
In the context of discussing why to stay in the race for the Democratic nomination, unnecessarily mentioning the assassination of a candidate during a previous race, less than two weeks before the 40th anniversary of that event, it at best – at best! – unwise.
Perhaps it’s forgivable for someone making a post on a blog to not appreciate the implications of doing so. It’s completely unacceptable for Sen. Clinton to fail to do so though.
Posted by: Aengil | May 24, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Democrats’re proving that NOWAY TO STAND BEHIND SEN OBAMA THIS NOV.
Sen Obama – 2061
Posted by: Whatever. | May 24, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Aengil,
This is a much more simple case than you are making it out to be. If you are an Obama supporter you don’t like what she said because you want Obama to win. If you are a Hillary supporter you think what she said was innocuous because you want Hillary to win. This is called politics.
======================================
Obama and SweetieGate, we shall not forget!
======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 24, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
obama supporters
what did obama mean when he said on the 18th of may-that iran was a little country with a little military budget and posed no real threat to america.
and then on the 19th of may, say
the threat from iran to the us is grave.
how do you obama supports read it
which obama will be in the white house.
the one of the 18th or the one of the 19th?
Posted by: shameonyou | May 24, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
False outrage is what I call all this if RFK jr. is ok with what Hillary then why should this even be a story if you are in fear for Obama ask him to drop out.
Posted by: Bishop | May 24, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Hillary, and her campaign, most notably Terry McCauliffe, have made the observation several times that “anything can happen”. And, she’s used the assassination example before as justification..
It’s not like Hillary hasn’t had this thought before. There’s nothing new here.
Just not supposed to say it out loud, and especially not with the video tape running.
However, it may perhaps mercifully end the talk of Hillary being veep.
“Lead me not into temptation, but deliver me from
evil…”
Matthew 6:13
Might be considered downright un-Christian, certainly uncharitable, to put Hillary in a position where she had to brood daily over the fact that she’s “only one heartbeat away” from her prize.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | May 24, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
it is to bad NO ONE in the media had the guts to say-what rfkjr said.
Posted by: shameonyou | May 24, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
do not know of, nor have i read a post by a hillary supporter that says we WANT her to be bho’s vp.no one i know will vote for bho with or wothout hillary. the key is we do not want bho as president regardless.
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Obama should STRONGLY condemn this manufactured controversy.
If he was truly a new kind of politician he would tell these people that they should be ashamed of themselves.
Posted by: Barb in MN | May 24, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
no none of the sen. clinton supporters want her to be his vp.
it would upset the natural order of things.
when has, and why should the smartest most qualified one take the second position behind the underqualified one?
everytime obama opens his mouth he shows just how unqualified he is to be president. and there should be reason to be concerned about him being in the white house, it is not his safety and future we should be worried about, he is covered. it is the middle class and poor that should be worried.
Posted by: shameonyou | May 24, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
barb, in mn,
how can obama do that now, it was HIS people who made sure this got to the msm with the spin they put on it.
but if he and his handlers get wind of anything close to what you have said, and they think it would be politcally expedient for him to do so.
i suppose before sunday night is over we will hear obama condemn what has gone on.
Posted by: shameonyou | May 24, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
And Farrakhan supporters murdered Malcolm X. If Clinton choose Obama as VP what’s to say they won’t do to the same to her.
Posted by: geevill | May 24, 2008 10:27:36 AM
*********
What? She doesn’t get to CHOOSE anything, she lost.
Posted by: MI VOTER | May 24, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Barb in MN,
They are the ones fueling this! What gets me is Obama and that creep of a wife of his have been given a free pass on everything. Michelle brought this subject up a few months back. Hillary in no way shape or form was insinuating that Obamabi was going to be assassinated.
You are right if he is the great uniter and above all this nonsense he needs to come out and tell them he is ashamed of how this has been blown out of proportion.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Obama and SweetieGate, we shall not forget!
**********
Oh good Lord! I live in MI, that reporter is annoying, rude and gross. “Sweetie” is probably the nicest thing she has been called in 5 years. Give it a rest!
Posted by: MI VOTER | May 24, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
The obama people are so ticked off that Hillary just keeps on winning. They cant face the fact that he lost all the big important states in the union to Hillary. They know she won the popular vote.I cant blame them for being afraid.
Posted by: brigitte | May 24, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
When was the last time there was positive news about Hillary? This being a holliday weekend, it has all weekend to stew.
Posted by: Thinking | May 24, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
j and barb mn,
obama “the new politician” will do that
only if they can see that it will serve them in some good fashion.
i am done with the dem. party.
if obama and the way his handlers say this is the new dem party i want no part of it.
but this has been obama’ mo from the very first time he ran for public office.
obama will not be president.
Posted by: shameonyou | May 24, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Obama should learn a lesson from Robert Kennedy Jr.–it’s called “class”
Obama is too busy trying to portray himself as a victim and looking for sympathy votes.
We love you Hillary! or McCain 08
Posted by: cindy in nc | May 24, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I don’t like Hillary, but was convinced that somebody at Fox had distorted what she said. She actually did mention the murder as part of her thought process!
On one hand you have Bill saying she would make a good VP and she is holding on the to fact that Obama would get killed! She must actually think that got smote Edward for being against her and Barack will get his. How mean spirited person is she.
Just out of lack of good faith I would keep her off the ticket. Let the credits roll on Hillary’s Fatal Election drama. I tell you Glenn Close is going to play Hillary and Will Smith will play Obama in the movie about this election!
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | May 24, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
i repeat…the dem party that has vocally and tacitly suppoted bho, their affirmative action experiment, will make sure bho gets the nomination.
what they cannot assure, is how people will vote, and what the rep. will throw at him.
Posted by: pp | May 24, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
While watching the WHOLE interview, she had undoubtedly used a poor example as proof to her extended campaign argument.
However, someone with a keen eye and ear for politics as Hillary, having this example at the ready is pretty inexcusable. The American political timeline is littered with tragedies such as RFK’s – and using his nomination (and eventual death) as your case example is under Politics 101′s do’s and don’ts. There are MUCH better examples to cite.
It’s understandable that she’s been on a pretty grueling schedule. However, it doesn’t take away that this example was in the stockpile of answers to the extended campaign question. I would take Obama to task for the same.
Unfortunately, the salt in the wound was her apology. However, I don’t think she understood the media backlash that would come of it when she addressed. Expect a more full-rounded apology within the next 24 hours (or so I hope!)
Posted by: Robs | May 24, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
mr coffee,
I know glen close and her father
(who was a dr. in our area.)
she would not stoop to be a part of this mess.
now will smith, that is another story.
Posted by: world citizen | May 24, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Of course – maybe that’s the plan. Let this thing go global, make sure everybody has heard the twisted version and the damage has been done, before Obama comes out and heroically shuts it down.
Posted by: Barb in MN | May 24, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
robs,
since when did hillary clinton have a keen eye and sharp ear for politics?
Posted by: the all seeing eye | May 24, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Obama supporters are overplaying their hand here. Their outcries go beyond the “silly season” politics Obama so denounces – this is no less than down and dirty, in the gutter, twist anything your opponent says to try to make it work for you, worst of the same old politics. Just keep whining about how dirty the Republicans and Hillary are. Your accusations would be comical if they weren’t so disgusting.
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 24, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
We have been silenced by the PROSTRATING Main Stream Media. But we are as DEFIANT as EVER, JUST as Hillary has been. We stand with her. All the way to the convention.
Mr. Howard Dean, are you listening??? If you insist on spitting on the over two million people who defied your IMPERIAL decree and voted in Michigan and Florida, the Democratic Party will become the PERMANENT minority party.
Finally, thank you, Mr. Michael Barone, for speaking for us, the SILENT majority of the SOON-TO-BE-FORMER Democratic Party.
“Most reporters are liberals, whose circles of friends and acquaintances have included people with views not dissimilar to those of Wright or William Ayers, the unrepentant Weather Underground bomber with whom Obama served on a nonprofit board and at whose house his state Senate candidacy was launched. Such reporters don’t find these views utterly repugnant or particularly noteworthy. But most American voters do. And they wonder whether a candidate who associates with such people agrees with them — or disbelieve him when he says he doesn’t. “
Posted by: Brent | May 24, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
I’m not sure how Obama’s campaign comes under fire for Hillary’s statement. The example she cited raised some eyebrows and Obama’s camp was asked for a response. They provided one – and later Axelrod stated he didnt think Hillary was doing anything but proving her point to continue into June.
Yet, this is being painted as Obama’s intention to be divisive and petty? Because they didnt do more to steer the MSM away from a headline? I admit there’s more that can be done for party unity but stating this is Obama’s fault is a bit distorted. I think everyone needs to get outside and breathe a bit.
Posted by: Robs | May 24, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Why else would she stay in the race? the numbers aren’t in her favor. Delegates are switching camps. She is inciting her supporters to obliterate Obama. Who will be left. “Me, Me, Me – Hillary. Oh..There’s McCain to obliterate. I can just dress like a witch and go to his home in the night and he’ll get a heart attack seeing me at the window with his age. I win! I will win the Presidency for me!
Posted by: mandy | May 24, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
The issue is that Hillary could simply have stated that her husband’s campaign as well as Kennedy’s campaign continued into June WITHOUT bringing up the assassination. It was simply tasteless and without sensitivity.
Posted by: Maureen | May 24, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Mandy,
Where is your proof she is inciting anything??????? I am sure you never said something that never came out how you intended it.
Obama has repeatedly opened his yap and made gaffes and NOBODY gives a rat’s behind, he’s given a free pass. For you to make a charge like that is irresponsible.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Thank you Mr. Kennedy. This election process has been so ugly. Senator Clinton is criticized for every word she does or doesn’t say. She is the most qualified, intelligent, and hard working candidate we have. People have joined the Obama bandwagon like sheep who have no place to go. The fact is that Obama started the ugliest by referring to the “Clinton Machine” early on and the press has joined in. We should be happy that she is so tenacious and holding on. People need to start thinking, and the delegates need to get their heads out of the clouds and do what is best for this country not what sounds good in the press.
Posted by: Deb | May 24, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
being an Obama supporter has nothing to do with what she said, as much as being a human being, who is old enough to remember some of america’s darkest moments. With america’s dark history of asssaination of our leaders why would she say something like that,and twice. She was not called down on it in March so she said it again. The fact she said it to why she was still ln this race makes it even more cold-blooded. It was a lot of other examples she could have given,like the fact the nomination process was taken to the convention that year, which is what she plans to do. This would have been more appropriate to why she was still in the race,than the death of a democratic opponent of that year. This has to haven been in this woman’s heart,to have mentioned this more than once. I know Bobby Jr. is a supporter of Hillary’s so I think he would hope that this is not what she meant.
proverbs: the heart of the rightous weighs his answers,but the mouth of the wicked gushes evil proverb 15:28
But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man “unclean” (Matthew 15:18).
The tongue has the power of life and death (Proverbs 18:21).
Reckless words pierce like a sword, but the tongue of the wise brings healing (Proverbs 12:18). And to think that this statement came from a seasoned and experienced politician.
God please help us all!!!!!!!
Posted by: what is in Hillary's heart? | May 24, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
The gaffe is one thing, the bigger problem is her lame apology, if you can even call it that. She has still not apologized to Obama, his wife and his children for discussing the possibility of his assassination in the campaign trail.
Posted by: b2 | May 24, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Bob,
That is because obviously there are alot of STUPID people on this planet. His OWN SON IS NOT OFFENDED. He is the only one that should be and he’s not. She DID NOT infer that Obama was going to be assassinated. Which part of that don’t you morons get??????????????????????
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
“Obama supporters are overplaying their hand here. Their outcries go beyond the “silly season” politics Obama so denounces – this is no less than down and dirty, in the gutter, twist anything your opponent says to try to make it work for you, worst of the same old politics.”
Exactly.
Posted by: 57 states and counting | May 24, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Look, I dislike Hillary as much as anyone for how and her husband have conductedn themselves this campaign. However, her comment about RFK is more stupid and thoughtless than anything else. Obama supporters should simply move on to other things. Showing righteous indignation over her remarks does not help your cause…
Posted by: indy_voter | May 24, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
I guess this is the Change we can believe in. If that’s true there is no HOPE for this country.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
I love how everything has become HRC is the victim. She makes a stupid statement but its BHO fault. I understand that HRC supporters love her but this is silly.
Posted by: bored | May 24, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Mary, Excuse me….I think you have it backwards….Hillary and Bill have practiced gutter politics for 30+ years. It is they who attempt to bring every down to their level. These are the same tactics used by their supposed right-wing conspiracy enemies. That is why they have no problem being so chummy with Fox news lately. They believe that is how politics is supposed to be. That is why I will never vote for them.
Posted by: indy_voter | May 24, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Also if you believe that the two examples that she gave were some how historical then thats an even bigger problem.
Posted by: bored | May 24, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
bored,
This is why:
“”Senator Clinton’s statement before the Argus Leader editorial board was unfortunate and has no place in this campaign,” wrote Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton in a missive to reporters.
Burton’s e-mail included a link to a New York Post story which noted that Obama, who received a Secret Service detail early in the campaign, has been the subject of threats. “
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
just wait for the decision of the DNC on May 31, if it does not favor her …Talk about a bully!
Posted by: Tim | May 24, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Please read this:
“Shortly after Clinton’s comments drew negative coverage on the network newscasts, the Argus Leader came to the former first lady’s defense.”
“The context of the question and answer with Sen. Clinton was whether her continued candidacy jeopardized party unity this close to the Democratic convention,” wrote the Argus Leader editorial board. “Her reference to Mr. Kennedy’s assassination appeared to focus on the timeline of his primary candidacy and not the assassination itself.”
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
How does that make her a victim?
Posted by: bored | May 24, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Also if you believe that the two examples that she gave were some how historical then thats an even bigger problem.
Posted by: bored———-
Tell us how they aren’t historical and fact, Einstein.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Also can you honestly compare WJC in 92 and the 1968 primaries to the current situation. I say this to bring up the point that its one to to try to win a campaign but when you try to change history, math and reality you start to offend not only obama fans(yes you people on both sides have become fans as in FANATICS)but bystanders like me who just don’t like republicans.
Posted by: bored | May 24, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Hillary women:
Where was she when this happened? [Quietly in opposition I suppose.]
[Dee Dee Myers] revealed in her memoir that when she discovered that she had a lower salary than her predecessor, her request to have it raised was refused for “budgetary reasons.”
She then stated that a male coworker in a position of less responsibility than hers was paid more, she was told it was because he was older and had a family.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | May 24, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
bored,
How is she changing history, math and reality. Those campaigns ran until June. That was her point!
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
j is it really that simple?
Posted by: bored | May 24, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Okay
this is the problem…
look at the new list Hillary has acquired over the length of this primary…of “gaffes” … who has a list that long…
just like the Clinton scandal “lists”…and once again Hillary supporters blame these lists on someone else… or someone out to get Hillary.
This woman was married to a President for 8 years…what if someone involved an assassination (for whatever reason) in regard and during Bill’s impeachment trials…
Hillary would be the first one screaming that it was disgusting and revolting and that that person should be removed.
From “obliterate” Iran to “hard-working people… hard-working white people” to she’s “good in the kitchen” to invoking slavery and the holocaust and women’s suffrage all in the name of her own election…
enough…
someone who puts those issues over themselves does not use them as marketing tools.
How can you all see that here is a candidate that is not about being President for the countries sake and all these issues…but first and foremost she puts her own candidacy over those issues and risks to her party, the country and the safety of other candidates.
Posted by: dl | May 24, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
How is she changing history, math and reality. Those campaigns ran until June. That was her point!
***************************************
Lets put it context they didn’t start untill the middle of March. So yea they ran to June.
They are on a different time schedual, there is no comparison.
Posted by: Thinking | May 24, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
bored,
Why put that notion into anybody’s head. Do i have to spell it out for you? How old are you 12? Obama’s camp is making this an issue and she didn’t even mention the boney little twits name or mention assassinating him.
I am sick and tired of every time Hillary says something people twisting what she says and Obama the uniter is right up there with everybody else.
Posted by: J | May 24, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
why did she use RFK as the example…80 and 84 were long primaries (and by the way it is false that Bill clinton didn’t secure the nomination until jJune…yes California hadn’t voted but all of his strong competitors had left a month or so earlier.
Posted by: dl | May 24, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
I just don’t get why this remark is being called “shocking!” Any of us who were in school or adults at that time remember this event, and I don’t understand why the sheer mention of it would be offending, especially in the context it was spoken. Frankly, I don’t see the difference in this statement and the constant reminders in January and April of MLK’s assassination which were definitely for political gain. The Obama camp sure wanted to make sure everyone remembered that event. What’s the big deal about mentioning an historical event! Obama’s people just keep reinforcing many Clinton supporters feelings that Obama will stoop to any level to undermine Sen. Clinton’s still viable candidacy. They also keep reinforcing my resolve to never vote for him under any circumstances because of his tactics, win at all cost.
Posted by: DWC | May 24, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
It’s Obama’s fault that Hillary didn’t win!
Posted by: Thinking | May 24, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
J thats a reach and you know it. Using that logic if a clinton supporter shoots BHO then its HRC fault. thats crazy
Posted by: bored | May 24, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
DWC you bring up a great point. Do HRC supporters really view BHO as some kind of insurgent who took away HRC deserved nomination? A Esau, Jacob situation.
Posted by: bored | May 24, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
So now you all are blaming obama …who has said really nothing about this…and sayign it isn’t even weird or bad judgement that she invokes and assassination in a timeline that she doesn’t have to use (their were orther extended primaries …a number of them and all were notable and well known) …
It is bad for any candidate to use a candidates assassination when referencing anything.
C’mon …you all aren’t that blind that you can’t see at the least it is a strange reference and weird to pick that as your historical reference point.
80, 84… and there are a few further back… why skip 80 and 84 ?
That is what is nonsensical.
She slipped, okay.
But you all saying suddenly this is Obama’s fault… I guess that is how this whole election has gone…all of Hillary’s lists are someone else’s faults.
whew…you really have to be screwy over the top brainwashed to stay on that roadmap.
Posted by: dl | May 24, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Last night, I found RFK Jr. statement on the “noquarter” web site. I copied it and posted it everywhere I could, including here on ABC. Not one of the mainstream media outlets carried that statement until late last night and just a handful are carrying it today. How is it that reaction by a member of RFK’s family was completely ignored, but reaction from Obama’s campaign was plastered everywhere? How is it that Obama’s campaign and supporters can interpret Clinton’s remarks to mean some kind of pronouncement of an assassination attempt on Obama? The only public remarks I’ve heard about an Obama assassination are from Doris Lessing and … Michele Obama. Also, Jake and fellow travelers here, if you go to the Argus Leader’s site, you can see Clinton’s interview in its entirety and also a statement by the Argus Leaders’s editor who was at that roundtable asking questions that Clinton’s remarks were in the context of a timeline about the nominating process and nothing else. What is wrong with our media? How can we excuse the continuous shredding of one candidate and the continuous coddling of another as “journalism?” While the “media” reports that this situation has hardened the resolve of many to attack Sen. Clinton, it has only hardened my resolve to vote for her … as top of the ticket … independent candidate … or write in vote .. in November. This voter is angry. Sign me a Bobby Kennedy Democrat from 1968 and a Hillary Clinton Democrat in 2008.
Posted by: Mandelay3 | May 24, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
anyone see Olbermann last night. He has totally lost it foaming at the mouth he devoted 11 minutes ranting.
What really surprised me though is the he frequently quotes history. Yet, here he went off the deep end. MSNBC is more one-sided than even Fox who I imagine are getting alot more Democrat viewers.
I think he’s turned alot of people off given that more than 17 million voted for Hillary already. I decided to boycott MSNBC and their sponsors.
Posted by: Hank | May 24, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
I can’t believe the hysterical comments being made on this and other websites.
Senator Clinton was stating a historical fact not inciting murderous threats. I was 13 when RFK was murdered and even then I knew that this country would never be the same – that we had lost our hope for any future of the this country. Senator Clinton would have been a young adult during that time and that tragedy made such a strong impact on everyone’s lives that we still see it today. We would not have had Richard Nixon and Watergate, Reagan and Iran/Contra and we certainly would not have had the tragedy of these last eight years.
On the other hand, when I read or hear the ignorant comments like these being made, I wonder what kind of country have we become and no wonder we were stuck with this current administration.
When Bill Clinton was President, he turned this country around despite the press, the Republicans, and Monica. If Hilary can just be half as good as he was this country has a chance. Obama doesn’t have the life experience and the
contacts to know how to do this. Inspiration and intelligence are not the same things.
Posted by: Deb | May 24, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
So Obama can say things like “typical white people” among others and then say “but what I meant to say was…” and all is forgiven. And Michelle can asy, “This is the first time I am proud of America”, but then later say, “what I meant to say was…” and we are all supposed to say oh, of course. But when Hillary Clinton makes an unfortunate statement she is burnt at the stake. Smacks of reverse discrimination to me. Count me among the former Democrats who will never cast a vote for Obama.
Posted by: Former Democrat | May 24, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
The obama people are ticked off because Hillary is continuing to win huge landslides
Posted by: brigitte | May 24, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Bored,
Nothing to do with Esau and Jacob. Simple fact, Sen. Obama is simply the least qualified of the three, and he is the one running the divisive campaign by twisting words at every opportunity. The press is even more guilty of twisting words out of context however, particularly MSNBC. I refuse to even tune that station in anymore, mainly because of the Olberman and Matthews hate diatribes which seem to only be getting worse. I also wish Obama had honored his promise to the people of Illinois and at least served a full Senate term before running for President. Serving as a state legislator and 18 months of U.S. Senator has obviously not given him the experience or knowledge of issues as evidenced by his performances in the debates. Many of us just don’t want another President who has to learn on the job in today’s world. That said, I do respect everyone’s opinion to support their own candidate on things that matter most to them (as long as it doesn’t involve name calling.)
Posted by: DWC | May 24, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
She apologized to the Kennedys but not to Obama and his family. She and her supporters still don’t get why her comments were thoughtless to say the least. She has run a campaign dedicated to maligning her opponent, a fellow democrat, to the point that I fear we democrats have lost the election. She will not be the nominee, but she does not want any other nominee to win. I have several friends who supported her at the beginning of this campaign. Most of them are now for Obama because of the divisive campaign she has run. You don’t see Obama supporters leaving in droves to support Hillary though. I am a 60-year-old feminist (and proud of it) who does not identify with Hillary at all. She and Ferraro do not represent me. By the way, as far as I know, she was not intending to threaten Obama’s life.
Posted by: Rozanne | May 24, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
This is why Mccain will win, everything is turned into a slight to Obama. No one can say anything without it being turned in a racist thing.
Posted by: Tina from Florida | May 24, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
The Manchurian Candidate.
Posted by: Phil E Buster | May 24, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I have just finished reading many of the posts to this article. I am shocked at her comments because the use of “assassination of Bobby Kennedy” and her husband in race until June as examples of reason why she is staying in race to June. This is not first time she has used assassination of Bobby Kennedy as reference to present race. Legal implied and suggestive reference is Barack Obama could be assassinated. Hilary is intelligent attorney and seasoned politician. Word usage is her profession. Remember Mike Huckabee made joke at gun show – “someone aiming gun at Barack Obama, he just fell off the chair.” Now FBI will be on high alert. These comments could affect all of the candidates- the target Barack Obama, and Mike Huckabee and Hilary Clinton because of what they said. Supporters tell your candidate to stop. I don’t care anymore if accidental or not. Words are out there. At least encourage prevention in in the future.
Posted by: Sharon Lim | May 24, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Obviously RFK,jr is enmeshed in the wicked web of Hellary. lol
Considering that Obama had to have the earliest ever security detail on account of KNOWN threats, the race baiting, gender baiting Clintons are INSENSITIVE at best!
Posted by: Patriot | May 24, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Before the BO campaign mention it, nobody thinks it is an offense. Thereafter, their fanatics beat up the hatred and venoms, the media follow with zest.
What a familiar scene. The same way that Bush ran his campaign against Kerry and Gore.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 24, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The reason that RFK Jr. support Hillary is because he is sane and his mind functions well not like those of fanatics who are overwhelmed with hateful remarks ready to pollute the world.
Before the BO campaign mention it, nobody thinks it is an offense. Thereafter, their fanatics beat up the hatred and venoms, the media follow with zest.
What a familiar scene. The same way that Bush ran his campaign against Kerry and Gore.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 24, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
The media is making too a big a deal over this comment because they want Hillary to drop out. Obama will not have enough pledged delegates to win the nomination by June 3rd. The superdelegates can say whatever they want, but they don’t actually vote until the convention.
Posted by: Kelly | May 24, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
I have never posted here, but even I am appalled by some of the things written. Senator Clinton wasn’t talking about Senator Obama, she was only stating why she is staying in the race, how other contest have gone beyond June. And BTW – Robert Kennedy was behind in the delegate count back in 1968, by about 168 delegates, so he probably would have gone to the convention with less delegates, so he probably wouldn’t have gotten to the nomination, yet he felt compelled to take the fight all the way to the convention and no one asked him to drop out.
Posted by: Ana | May 24, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
DWC, your 12:21:40 PM post is a good one. I’d forgotten how the Obama camp shamelessly tried to use Dr. King’s assassination to further their own cause when it suited them to do so. Thanks for reminding us.
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 24, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Who cares what RFK Jr. says, Obama is the one threatened.
Posted by: Mike | May 24, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Fanatic definition: A person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm, as for a cause.
You Obama followers really scare me. Get a reality check will you?
It was not brought up by her anything about Obama, it was in your head, get it?
His own son, his namesake knew she meant anything can happen, why should you be offended if he isn’t?
Posted by: Susan Powers | May 24, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
The “spin” from the Obama campaign is predictable. After all they were the original source of the accusations of racism against the Clintons and their supporters.
They are the meanest and most effective marketing machine in recent history…but then you have to have a willing and corrupt media environment to thank for their success,
Believe it or not in a Democratic year this “mean” machine that constantly feeds these memos to the public that are at odds with their candidates public statements …are creating an army of McCain voters.
Posted by: Jackie | May 24, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
If Hillary were to become President (fat chance), guess who will be running for her senate seat in NY?
That would be RFK, Jr.
Posted by: Ulterior Motive | May 24, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
I guess Hillary and Bubba now know what it feels like to be in the liberal media’s cross-hairs. We should make Hillary an honorary conservative.
Funny, only a few years back the Clintons were the darlings of the liberal media. Now they might as well be ultra conservatives.
The thing that brings a smile to my face is that my aunts who are liberal democrats have stated point blank to me they will vote against Husein Obama if he gets the nomination. I bet you there are a lot of democrats who feel that way.
On our side, thing’s aren’t much better. I sure as hell don’t think McCain is worthy of being president.
Posted by: Daniel | May 24, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Re: “This is not just about RFK, it is about Obama… For Hillary to suggest this could happen to Obama is chilling.”
She never said that this could happen to him. She didn’t even mention Obama!
You and the media have twisted Hillary’s words and given them your own scary meaning.
Posted by: Kelly | May 24, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Cleo, thank you for your insight. When push comes to shove I would not want an Obama supporter on my side. I appreciate what the Clinton’s did for this country, funny how some forget.
Posted by: Tina from Florida | May 24, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
I’m so sorry that the election has degenerated into this! The Clintons have been very close to the Kennedys and she would NEVER say or reference anything that would be offensive to them or to Mr. Obama for that fact. I really think that Hillary is being treated very badly and I for one will not vote for Obama if he becomes the nominee.
Posted by: Dee | May 24, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
I am an Independent, but have been leaning Democrat throughout this election. I am also female, but I have never sided with either Democrat, thinking that this would sort itself out and any Dem would be better than another 4 more years of Republican rule. This is only to put the balance back into the mix again. The pendulum swings. Now that Obama is mostly assured the nomination, I was thinking that Hilary should definitely be considered for VP. How better to unite the party. I have, however, changed my mind. She doesn’t deserve it. Clinton doesn’t get to have it both ways. She either is a smart suavy political operator who is ready on day one, or she makes juvenile and ridiculously inappropriate remarks demonstrating that she isn’t the well put together, intelligent candidate I thought her to be…she doesn’t get to have it both ways, but boy is she trying. As a female, I am disappointed that this is the woman who will go down as the first serious female contender. I hope she doesn’t burn the party to the ground and make it more difficult for the next woman.
Posted by: Merlin | May 24, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
too many inaccuracies here
RFK did not even get into the presidential race until MARCH of 1968 -
the CA primary was June 6th that year
He was only in the race for 3 months –
I was 15 and devastated to wake up on the East Coast June 7th to this horrific news
There was no reason on earth for Hillary Clinton to invoke this -
If the CA primary was held next week as it had been every other Presidential Election year – Sen Obama would win – he is way WAY ahead in every CA poll
Feb 5th was name recgonition day–
Sen Clinton should drop out on June 3rd with some dignity in tact or she may find herself without a career in politics
And to the person here who cites what the Clinton’s “did” for this country?
I was a BIG Bill supporter – but in retrospect his indulgence was a big part of Gore’s situation in 2000 -
The country has also been very good to the Clintons $107 million good since 2001
The country and the Clintons are even- they need to step aside adn stop monopolozing the party and the political climate of the country
There is too much drama with the Clintons and this country has enough real drama–
Two wars
An economic meltdown
A worsening global climate crisis
Lost respect and leadership in the world
It is not about the Clinton’s–it is about us, our children, our future
Sen Clinton has shown a lack of grace and dignity and as Rep Clyburn said this remark was “beyond the pale”
Posted by: alison | May 24, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
All this would make sense, except for the fact that Hillary is a “black widow”, and the Clinton’s have left a list of over 150 mysteriously dead friends and associates in their wake. If I were Obama I’d increase my security tenfold – at least!
Posted by: Paul Meers | May 24, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
If JFK has spoken about RFK, why is BHO supporters still paranoid over HRC’s remarks ?
Posted by: csquan | May 25, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
Why is it OK for Obama to talk about MLK assasination for a whole month but it is evil for Clinton to even make a historical connection as to why she is still in the race! Clinton haters are turning sand-pile into a mountain to push her out from the race. Hillary may be evil for some people but count of popular votes indicates that she is loved and adored by as many dems as Obama has been and dragging her out from the race by spitting hatred towards her will just end the party’s hope of winning the White-house.
Posted by: Herm | May 25, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
I am so looking forward to a McCain landslide this November. Obama supporters are the mirror image of the radical right, they are crazed. I will not only cross over to vote for McCain this election but also work for him. Unify that!
Posted by: claudia | May 25, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
That woman Hillary is pure EVIL. I told you so!!!
This nation hasn’t seen anything yet from what will come from that evil woman’s heart!!!
Posted by: Mary | May 25, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
This comment wasn’t at Obama. Obama and his supporters are so arrogant to think anything Hillary says is about Obama. This has nothing to do about Obama. The editorial board asked her why she is still in the race. They never mentioned Obama in the question. She said she doesn’t understand why people want her out. Historically, primary seasons have gone into June like 1992 when Bill was running and in 1968 when RFK was assassinated. She brought it up because it was the night in June when RFK won the nomination but was assassinated that same night. People remember the assassination as a June event. Other people of Hillary’s generation who remember the assassination, remember it was june. Even the newspaper who was interviewing her didn’t think much of it. It was the Obama supporter who hyped it up. This is another reason why Hillary supporters will definitely vote McCain in November as a strong protest vote AGAINST Obama and his nonsense and lies.
Posted by: Will | May 25, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
WILL: It was about Obama! She said and I quote, ” My opponent”…… I don’t think she meant McCain? Didn’t you watch SNL? McCain wants her to keep up the campaign? NO, she first started her comments by saying, “My opponent wants me to………” LOL
Posted by: Marie McD | May 25, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
If I’m offended, I’m offended. I can’t delegate my response even to a family member.
Posted by: newddle | May 25, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Robert Kennedy Jr. offends me.
Posted by: hombre | May 25, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Last year Hillary was trotted out as
the hot new vehicle that would take
America by storm. I didn’t know that
Edsel has a full sized van.
Posted by: hombre | May 25, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Right from the horses mouth.. Yet the Obama camp started this whole controversy, so much for the false unity he beleives in… Obama for the democratic party destruction is all this is..
Posted by: Jr | May 26, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
I recall that I heard about Obama’s bitter gaffe first from Mrs clinton when I was litsening to her talk in a PA rally.So I do not understand why she is saying it is Obama’s camp making ahuge deal of her serious insinuations about Obama’s life.Her comments are way more serious than the bitter comment because her sia a threat to a man’s life!She talked and talked at every opportunity about the bitter gaffe..what goes around comes around,she didn’t even get any heat for this in my won opinion.
Posted by: Lady | May 26, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Hillary: She has every right to go all the way to the finish line. It’s pathetic when the media and her opponent’s mouthpieces whine, “Please quit. Oh, stop running against our rock star wonder. He’s so young! He can wave a magic wand cure all the ills of the worlld and we can get back to drugs and be permanent college kids and run up the tab some more and, hey, sponge on Mom and Dad and feel sorry for ourselves. To the pillory with Hillary so he who speaks for us can have a free ride. HA!
Posted by: Bill | May 26, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
The first female president would be just as big of a target as the first black president…
I commend Bobby Kennedy Jr, for continuing to stand behind Senator Clinton. I for one cannot jump on the Obama bandwagon because he has yet to show me anything of substance…fluff is not enough to get the job done. We are talking about the presidency here. I am a state delegate for TX that decided not to submit by bid for candidacy for the national convention because although a democrat, I am not a happy democrat. I can’t stand the way the superdelegates have let Obama and his supporters bully them into jumping ship, I cannot stand how this man skirts the issues, yet people feel he is qualified to lead this nation…why does anyone think he has what it takes to bring this nation where we need to be both at home and abroad?
I am a very passionate and emotional person, however, I never allow emotions to sway my decisions when it comes to politics…I vote logically…I am starting to think that I am one of a few.
Posted by: Keli | May 28, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
I commend Hillary for her statement.
Hillary gave a sound example of previous primaries extending into June.
This was an excellent example that many people would remember or know about.
Hillary can and should stay in the race.
Posted by: A Allen | May 29, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am