Rove’s Latest Electoral Maps Have Clinton Stronger Than Obama Against McCain
Electoral maps put together by the consulting firm helmed by Karl Rove, and obtained by ABC News, show Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, to be a stronger general election candidate in a hypothetical general election match-up against Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., than Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois.
Click HERE to see the maps and charts from Karl Rove & Co., obtained by ABC News.
States are allocated in Rove’s exercise based on an average of public polls, which many pollsters would tell you is a rather unscientific way to look at the data.
Still, for political junkies the information is interesting.
In the first map from Karl Rove & Co., McCain leads Obama in a hypothetical match-up, winning states totaling 238 electoral votes to Obama’s 221 electoral votes.
There are 538 total electoral votes. At least 270 are needed to win the presidency.
The trend is positive for Obama — he is up 14 electoral votes from May 11, and McCain is down 13 electoral votes.
The map shows McCain winning Florida, New Hampshire, West Virginia and Wisconsin. States with 79 electoral votes — Connecticut, Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, and Virginia — are toss-ups, within a margin of error of +/- 3 points.
In the hypothetical Clinton-McCain match-up, Clinton leads with 259 electoral votes to McCain’s 206 electoral votes.
States totaling 73 electoral votes — Connecticut, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, and New Mexico — too close to call.
Clinton, too, is trending upwards, with a gain of 11 electoral votes since May 11.
The big differences between Clinton and Obama, beyond the her larger number:
Clinton would make competitive some states that Obama would lose — such as Missouri and New Hampshire — and she would win others outright, such as Arkansas, Florida, Ohio and West Virginia.
On the other hand, McCain would handily win beat Clinton in some states that Obama made competitive, such as Colorado, North Dakota, and Virginia. Some states that Obama would win, such as Minnesota and Nebraska — Clinton would lose to McCain.
Occasionally this election cycle the electoral maps of Karl Rove & Co. have reared their heads. In March, McCain adviser Mark McKinnon was spotted holding some of these maps, as reported by Texas Monthly.
- jpt
UPDATE: Clinton referenced this blog post (kinda) in a campaign appearance today.
Email
White House Blinks Amid Catholic Church Anger?
Navy SEAL Commander Advised: Get the Hell Out of the Media
Three words:
OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE
Posted by: USVet | May 19, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Now consider this:
IT’S THE MAP NOT THE MATH! In addition to the popular vote, the electoral map shows Clinton with a cushion and Obama with a deficit. If you transpose the primaries Hillary has won into electoral votes, she has won 311 electoral votes to Obama’s 217. That is a staggering difference.
Also:
She is ahead in the popular vote by 50,000 votes, counting Florida and Michigan which must be counted. She intends to continue to lead in the popular vote when June 3 comes around and everyone has voted.
This is hard data to ignore. If the SD’s do so, Dems will loose in the GE
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
The New Math:
Obama – Hillary supporters = Pres.McCain
Posted by: cindy in nc | May 19, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
You don’t need Rove, I could tell you that.
Posted by: Tina from Florida | May 19, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Democratic party insists, that Obama be the nominee, so there you have it . The lost of the general election is placed on the DNC shoulders, we all can thank them for re-electing a Republican to the White House. Hillary has more electoral votes (thats how Bush got in 2000) and she also has more popular votes ( thats what Gore had in 2000), but yet the DNC rather have Obama the looser.
Posted by: jp,michigan | May 19, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
I don’t think Obama will win PA.
Posted by: Tina from Florida | May 19, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Of course Clinton is stronger. Their is no way a black man is going to win. Kentucky is just the type of walloping Obama can expect in the General
Posted by: Face book | May 19, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Yes I would trust Rove because I am sure he has the democrats best interest at heart.
Posted by: jim | May 19, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Rove should be in prison where he belongs.
Posted by: dano | May 19, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
uh yeah rove is looking at it as if all the hillary voters who actually said they would not vote Obama actually did it…in the face of continuing the war, overturning roe vs. wade…no economic plan, no plan to take care of healthcare or housing…not worrying about our standing in the world and what it is doing to our security…
Of course Rove is going to say that he’s buummed it’s wrapping up.
Primaries only matter if the margins are huge.
The polls that show head to head match-ups stand along side and built on the same numbers that say they will defect …in the midst of a heated primary… those numbers are almost even …even with the defections…which any intelligent person knows that won’t be close…
so even if half of the people vote out of spite rather than on policy… Obama wins…hands down.
but hillary supporters and Rove all want it not to seem that way.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
It is plainly obvious that…
1. Clinton would beat Mccain in the GE
2. Obama will lose to Mccain in the GE
3. Clinton will carry her broad base and will still bring in independents, AA and latte liberals (as those groups typically fall to the democrats)
4. Obama will lose a majority of Clinton’s base, including woman (As her base is not guaranteed to go democrat, especially with Obama’s lack of experience and Mccain’s moderate standing)
5. The DNC is going to self destruct if they put Obama forward as the nominee as they will lose their base of support and the people that Obama is bringing in are fickle and will quickly lose interest.
Posted by: Andrea | May 19, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Obama is favored in Wisconson and especially New Mexico. This is more Rove propoganda. It’s funny though.
Obama 08
Posted by: disabledOIFvet | May 19, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
this math you all are using is really incredibly wrong.
Primaries only matter with HUGE margins…and even then it is questionable.
Look at the pols of head to head match ups with McCain getting no scrutiny.
Those polls inherently already have the same high water mark of defections at the heat of this primary….
and McCain is only tying them.
It is a joke…he is going to get blown out of the water.
Look at the real numbers.
and keep telling yourself the majority of Hillary supporters will go to McCain in the face of ending the war, healthcare, our standing in the world, the economy, the imbalance ion taxes…
supreme court justice nominations and the message that sends to congress that yuo vote for McCain’s platform.
that is just dumb… it will be a blow out still…and with obama we gain states.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Rove should be in jail NOT making up maps !
Posted by: Another Aussie | May 19, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Whoever puts this Karl Rove’s map in mind or follow it, is lost.
He is a very tricky person!
Posted by: Peace | May 19, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
obana wife talk obannna loses!
Posted by: pw | May 19, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
“Yes, General Custer, if you go into that valley, you will never come out.”
Rove isn’t feigning. He can count electoral votes as well as the rest of us.
The Democrats are on a death march to the sea.
Posted by: len | May 19, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
It’s hard to predict! In the hospital where I work at, many are considering to vote for McCain if Senator Obama becomes the Democratic nominee. The California RNs believe that Senator CLinton is best person to deal with when it comes to Public Health Reforms!!!!!
Posted by: sakura | May 19, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
LOL. What does “stronger” means. Electoral vote prediction based on snapshot from 6-months :) Why dont you ask Mark Penn how well that worked, Rove. Clinton was riding high on that only to find out that her polls mean squat 6-months out.
Posted by: Wayne | May 19, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
andrea
only half of the US liked Clinton before the primary…and by the statements on defections…she just lost half of those.
and I can tell you obama supporters are more independent than clinton supporters…
all this supposition about obama is just repeating Hillary and Rove’s talking points …but it is false math.
Obama will blow McCain out of the water…
do you think when they took all of these head to head match ups where he is tied with Obama they removed the large number who out of anger SAY they won’t vote for Obama out of spite…but in a general where it counts they will not vote to extend this war…risk women’s rights, sending the message to congress that American’s aren’t that opposed to conservative judges and soldiers dyying and out country floundering in a PR nightmare across the world and in villages where they are recruiting…
this is all stupid.
Americans aren’t that dumb…we learned our lesson from 2004. Be courageous…don’t be fearful.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Interesting.
Unfortunately it is the Democratic party primary math and not the Rovian math that we are using to determine the winner.
As a Clinton supporter it was hard to come to terms with this reality. It is however clear to me now that Obama will be the nominee.
My advice to my fellow Clinton supporters is that we should stop the bitterness irrespective of the obnoxious provocations and bellitling from the Obama supporters.
I just wish the Obama supporters could be magnanimous victors. This will go a long way in healing the Democratic party.
Posted by: Steve_NJ | May 19, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
For anyone looking at this demo primary objectively … we already knew this. Clinton can win it … Obama cannot.
Posted by: jackson | May 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
i agree there is no way a black barak obama beats mccain…just wont happen in this country..ill be voting mccain over obama, not because of color of skin but because of his character and because of his associations…too shady..i hope to get to vote Hillary
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Why should ANY Democrat listen to Rove?
Posted by: Stacey | May 19, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
CIndy in NC:
Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan, so counting that in the popular vote makes no sense.
Everyone else:
Obama won the primary, plain and simple. The DNC will not and should not overturn the will of the votes or the rules of the game. That will fracture the party more than any Obama win would.
Posted by: Democrat in the WH | May 19, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
You have ALL lost your bearings. Bush lost the primary in New Hampshire, then won it in the general by 20%. Rove is playing mind games. Don’t listen to the future chain gang member.
Posted by: Onlyonesane | May 19, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
I second that: OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE.
I will not vote for him no matter what the Democratic party threatens. No one will ever overturn Roe v. Wade – Republicans know that would be a disaster for them.
She leads in the popular vote and will have an even bigger lead by June 3.
The last time we gave the nomination to someone who didn’t win the popular vote was George McGovern. Remember how that turned out — he won a total of 17 electoral votes in the General Election.
Pay attention — DNC!!!!
Posted by: Annagain | May 19, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
i agree there is no way a black barak obama beats mccain…just wont happen in this country..ill be voting mccain over obama, not because of color of skin but because of his character and because of his associations…too shady..i hope to get to vote Hillary
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
This is just more spin to try and help Clinton. Its over! Like the Democrats would take advice from Karl Rove. The republican brand is horrible. Hello, he wants a republican to win. Sorry, he can take his mind game and play Clinton with it. Nobody else is buying it.
Posted by: leslie | May 19, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
If Obama loses Wisconsin, I will gladly give Karl Rove and Jake Tupper $1000 each…
Moreover, why do you think he’s releasing this? The race is over; Obama has won. The media keeps pushing the horserace because it’s good for their ratings. But that doesn’t make it true. Jerry Brown was theoretically viable at this point in 92… did he get this much attention???
Posted by: Pat | May 19, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
If her voters are not guaranteed to him, then it stands to reason that his voters are NOT guaranteed to her.
If he has electibility issues, then so does she. Don’t assume people will just fall in line behind Hillary, because they are Democrats. Most people, Democrats included, loathe the Clinton’s.
You can practice wishful thinking all you like but your analysis doesn’t make sense.
Posted by: Jase | May 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
didnt obama take his own name off the ballot in MI? wouldnt that be considered his own fault? how did Hillary happen to be on there and Obama not?
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
“Rove’s map shows…?” Who cares about what Rove’s anything shows? Why should we listen to a guy who helped get arguably the worst president in history elected twice? My guess is Rove is afraid of Obama because he represents the opposite of what Rove and Bush represented. In fact, whoever Rove wants running as the democrat (Clinton), I’m definitely voting for the other one (Obama).
Posted by: Jake | May 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Rove should be in jail Not making up maps.
Obama will be our next presidnet !
with or with out Clinton as a VP !
Posted by: Another Aussie | May 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Karl Rove and his porcine self channelling Rush Limbaugh. What a shock.
Posted by: Jackie | May 19, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
the economy was flourishing under Bill, was wonderful, deficit was down…i would love 8 more years of a Clinton
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
countall thevotes…
she is ahead n the popular vote…
hahahahahahah
c’mon…she’s ahead nationally because you need to count a big state where he wasn’t on the ballot… that is just stupid.
not to mention a state like all the rest where people didn’t meet the candidates and voted for the lady they knew as first lady…you know the same difference as almsot all the states before they campaigned in them…
that is why they call it a beauty contest.
duh
dumb da dumb dumb dumb
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Are the Dems really that screwed up, that offended Hillary supporters would actually vote Republican in the GE??
Enough of Clinton – she should be throwing support to Obama – instead she just looks foolish.
Either way, the Dem party screwed itself this year, because a lot of white men who say they will vote for a woman or a black man – WON’T – and no one will be in the booth to see it…..
Posted by: TennPhD57 | May 19, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
ryan every other democrat took their names off the ballot in Michigan but for Clinton!
Posted by: Another Aussie | May 19, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Pretty funny, I live in Wisconsin and can tell you McCain has major problems against Obama.
Our economy tends to trail the rest of the country and is just starting to feel the pinch.
We also have a huge population of former Chicagoans who have moved north.
Might want to think about it this way, Rove is a Republican. Whoever is says they would rather face, is a lie. When Hillary was considered the presumptive nominee, Rove said the Republicans are in trouble if they have to face Obama.
Now, Rove flip flops and says Hillary is the one they can’t beat.
Posted by: Dan | May 19, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Hillary to Bill Richardson: “Bill, he can’t win it”.
She’s so right. Those Obamites are in for a sad, sad November. The more info that emerges on this guy, the less appealing he becomes.
That story re gay sex in the limo will be the Sunday morning stuff of conversation in every church in the nation before November, even though the mainstream media will give him a pass on it.
Posted by: Marty | May 19, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Rove was the one that was giving Obama advice to beat Hillary. So you know who he wants to win. Obama supporters seem to think this election is just some coronation even though it is very close. They also seem to forget that swing voters and republicans exist. His wins especially those in caucuses are not a good prediction for what happens when everyone comes out to vote at once.
By the way, Obama sucks.
Posted by: Ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Rove’s map works on one level… it gets Hillary supporters who see the body lying there suddenly move.
It’s alive…it’s alive!
Just what he wants.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
hillary all the way.
Posted by: joe mauro | May 19, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
I’m sure Rove would love to go up against Hillary (figuratively AND literally); that would be a manageable fight.
It’s Obama that’s giving him nightmares.
Posted by: Aaron | May 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
hillary would win missouri, obama will not. claire mc caskill won the state by winning the very voters in rural mo. that will now vote for mc cain in large numbers. i suspect that mi, oh, and pa are largely the same. mc cain wins, obama loses. what a shame.
Posted by: wj in mo | May 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
OF COURSE ROVE WANTS CLINTON!!!
People these are the Republicans, what do you think they are going to say?? We want to run against Obama knowing he is going to crush McCain??
The Republicans know Hillary has such high negatives and with all the baggage and the SNIPER FIRE lies, they can beat her with their eyes closed!!
Who had a ralley in Oregon with 75,000 people in attendance yesterday?
Who had a rally in somebody’s backyard in Kentucky yesterday begging for money?
PLEASE LOOK AT WHERE THIS IS COMING FROM AND GIVE ME A BREAK!!
Obama 08!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
If the republicans can see who the weaker candidate is why come the DNC continue to push this weak link?
Maybe the Republicans will ask Hillary to be John McCain running mate, like Kerry wanted to ask McCain to be his.
Posted by: toby | May 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
HAHAHA… Do you remember Karl Rove’s interview in 2006 with NPR saying he knows “THE MATH” that Republicans would win? Hey, Rove, why dont you let the professionals do “the math” this time around?
It looks like your math last time didnt work out all that well.
Posted by: Wayne | May 19, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Latest bid by the Republicans to thwart the Democratic race in their favor.
Posted by: TK | May 19, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
hillary all the way.
Posted by: joe mauro | May 19, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
By: Calivn Woodward & Dave Pace
Boston Globe – Hillary Rodham Clinton’s assertions that she leads Barack Obama in the popular vote are a stretch, at best.
The New York senator is using such claims to shore up supporters and help justify why she’s still in the Democratic presidential race despite trailing Obama in the number of convention delegates earned in primaries and caucuses.
The argument is supported only by using dubious math on two fronts: by excluding several caucus states won by Obama and by including Florida and Michigan primary results that the Democratic Party, to date, is rejecting.
THE SPIN:
“I’m very proud that as of today, I have received more votes by the people who have voted than anybody else,” she said after her narrow Indiana victory and before her big win in West Virginia on Tuesday. “It’s a very close race, but if you count, as I count, the 2.3 million people who voted in Michigan and Florida, then we are going to build on that.”
Source: Boston Globe
Posted by: BostonGlobe | May 19, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
I won’t discount Rove. Even though he’s a devisive weasel, he knows what he’s doing when it comes to elections. It’s May, the Democrats are wrapping up their nomination process and the trend is what matters. Obama is up 14 points in 5 days. Wow. I still think that the Democrat will trounce McCain in the head to head debates. As he falls behind, McCain will be forced to go negative. Then he will be ridiculed for promising a positive campaign causing his numbers to go lower. Limbaugh et al will blast him as a weak, unRepublican candidate which will cause conservatives to further abandon him and stay home. And what’s up with Georgia on his map? McCain by 14%? Yeah right.
Posted by: TSnow27604 | May 19, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Ryan
Rove is going to give advice to anyone or anything that will keep the primary going. He wants the party divided …he gave Obama advice on a downturn…now Hillary’s campaign is dead and he is trying to get out the paddles.
and a handful of Clinton supporters (because most of the rest of them want what’s good for the nation not their candidate to be crowned like some kind of zealots)
are suddenly like “she’s alive her campaign’s alive…look they have the paddles out”
only because Rove is screwing with you and it is the argument he needs for HIS candidate.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
It will not be a contest against obama in Nov. With all of Hillary supporters voting for McCain plus he doesnt connect to the working class voters.
It will be McGovern all over again. He will maybe win Illinois and D.C.
Posted by: toby | May 19, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
ok another Aussie, sounds like every other candidate should have not done that..they should have known that you cant, not count the peoples votes..what do you think that will do the dems in the GE if the people of FL and MI are not heard? there is not a chance i would vote democrat if that was the situation i was put in..that my own party killed my voice..i would for sure vote republican..i plan on it if obama is the nominee anyway, i cant bring myself to vote for a racist bigot like him..plain and simple
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Well, of course. And if Hillary were in the position of being the just about inevitable nominee instead, then Karl would be saying how McCain lucked out that Hillary beat off McCain’s toughest competition in Barack Obama.
“Bush’s Brain” is… damaged. And, didn’t he get fired anyway, for the fiasco that was 2006?? The Republicans are going down in flames in November.
Posted by: Jill | May 19, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Hopefully they will arrest him soon so what he says really won’t matter anymore. Senator Conyers, handcuffs already why are you procrastinating?
Posted by: BeverlyAnn66 | May 19, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Clinton looks gross, elitist, haggard and plastic all at the same time – she is so full of it – and then there is her hubby the adulterer Bill hanging in the wings – shudder to think about him back in the White House!
I would vote for Obama never Hillary.
GO GO OBAMA!!
Posted by: Topo Gigio | May 19, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Rove’s maps are right. Hillary can win. Obama cannot. The DNC ignores this fact at their own peril. Unfortunately, it appears that they would rather make a point than win the White House. They deserve to go down in flames.
Posted by: HoosierSue | May 19, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
ryan,
When you say “there is not a chance i would vote democrat if that was the situation” you give yourself away as the right-winger you are. Real Democrats say “vote democratic” not “democrat”. Been listening to right-wing radio much?? Only there and on Fixed Noise do they call it the Democrat Party instead of the Democratic Party.
Posted by: Jill | May 19, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Ha…Ha…Ha…Ha…Ha…lol please!!
Rove, you are done, over-cooked and totally out of touch with reality…or as the younger generation would say “OOTWR” so please stop with your foolishness.
Nice try…so just go away!!! :~(
Posted by: 1968WhoWasI | May 19, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
toby
all those ehad to head matches that show mcCain and Obama tied…
they already take into account the highest water mark of possible defections…inherently they have to…
and that won’t be even close come the general when McCain sudddenly has the light of day on him instead of Obama haveing all the focus …
and Hillary supporters are smart caring patriots who worry about the soldiers that are dying, the economy, healthcare, women’s rights, the burden of tax breaks for the wealthy that the rest of the country has to carry…
there is NO way the predominance of people are going to vote out of spite once the issues start being talked about.
That is why Rove and Hillary want these to be the talking points and not the issues.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
dl, not disagreeing he is only releasing this to “stir the pot” so to say, but still, doesnt change my opinion about Obama..ill still not vote for him..even with Hillary as his potential vp..I think Mccain as president will do more to get this country back on track than will Obama as president…i have no trust for him and feel his racist ties and his wife bring him down so much i cant trust a man like that..period…plus, Hillary is not yet out of it..not until there is a democratic nominee should she get out…
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Obama would win WI, NC, and IN which are marked Red.
As for the toss-up(s) he would win IA, CO, NM, VA, MI and OH.
After the first Obama/McCain debate the choice will be clear. Obama08
The New Math:
Obama supporters + 65% of Hillary supporters + 20% of Republicans + 60% of Independents = President Obama
Posted by: Vanessa | May 19, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
and Rove’s firm also cannot add… the shading doesn’t match the numbers on the Clinton map… haven’t checked the Obama map for accuracy.
Posted by: boots | May 19, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
this is like deflecting the last spin coming out of the Clinrton campaign…
there are 2 minutes left and they are down by 30…but screaming at the refs.
This primary was the one strong place that Hillary COULD win…her stromngest chances were here…she had a 50% approval rating to begin with and that was all predominantly in the demnocratic party.
What do you think she is at now.
this is a joke.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Would you expect anything else from this dishonest republican. Why do you think limbaugh said to vote for HIllary? It’s because the GOP is scared to death of Obama. He had 80,000 people at his rally the other day in Oregon. mc-more-war is lucky he can pull in a bus load. Look for a landslide this fall against mc-more-war. Obama 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | May 19, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
You may not like the messenger, but the message is SOLID. What the Obama supporters don’t get is that America is not some liberal bastian. It is middle of the road conservative. The more people see of BO and his scary bitter wife, Memyselfandishelle, the more they will run to McCain. The devil you know never looked so good.
Posted by: beebop | May 19, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
The Republicans are sooo anxious to run against Hillary they can’t stand it! In addition to the Travelgate, Whitewater and pardons issues, they now have questionable (bribes from foreign governments?) mega donations to Clinton library and foundation, the lies about Bosnia fire exposing the fact that she will say or do anything just to get your vote! They are begging Democrats to put her on the ticket! DON”T FALL FOR IT DEMOCRATS! IT WILL BE YOUR UNDOING!
Posted by: mary S | May 19, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Karl Rowe is Republican. He would love Hillary to go against McCain so he can win.
Do the opposite of what Karl Rowe says for a Democrat to win.
Go Obama!
Posted by: Mike | May 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Obama CAN WIN:
- If you punish FL and MI for holding primaries and extend the punishment to the GE
- If you have proportionate delegate counts in : TX AZ The Southeast, The SouthWest, Midwest.
- Winner take ALL: CA NY IL
- Repeatedly have the Media/DNC on the air 24 hours/7days telling McCain to quit for the ‘Good’ of the Country. Because McCain winning the election will spoil the chances a ‘First Black President.’
- Plus, when McCain is winning , you have to repeatedly call his supporters: Racist, divisive, uneducated and intolerant brutes who should be sipping Venti Lattes instead of complaining about gas prices.
- Push the NYTimes to investigate Cindy McCain’s finances. Why should she inherit so much money. Label him an ‘elitist husband.’
- Accuse McCain of politicizing the POW ‘thing.’
- Oh yeah, make everything about Obama ‘politcially incorrect’ to talk about… Then slam McCain on his age and health like a broken record and en-masse via the media
See, I told ya Obama can Win!
Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Karl is resorting to this nonsense out of sheer desperation. He and the rest of the neocons see the tidal wave coming.
The neocon Bush administration has fragmented the Republican party. Rove is terrified of not just Obama winning, but even more so of the widely expected big downticket effect on other races. When the dust settles, the Republicans will be lucky to have 40% of either the House or Senate. That is what they get for their bully boy bam bam smash mouth governing style for the last eight years.
Obama, unlike Bush, will not repeat Bush’s mistake of becoming drunk on his own power, when he commences his first term as our President in January 2009.
Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | May 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
HA HA!!! Rove has McCain losing either WAY!!! OBAMA ’08.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Simple math in terms of delegate count may show that Sen. Hillary Clinton cannot win the nomination without the help of super-delegates. Simple math also show that Sen. Barack Obama also cannot win the nomination without the help of super-delegates. Simple math also shows that Sen. Obama is behind Sen. John McCain in many battleground states. Simple math also shows that Sen. Clinton is ahead of Sen. McCain in many battle ground states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Florida. Simple logic says that Sen. Clinton is the stronger candidate for the Democrats!
Posted by: charleychaplin | May 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
FL and MI will be heard Barack and Clinton will sort it out on May 31st
Barack didnt make the rules he just played by them Clinton did until she relised she was losing then she became there campion… It wil get sorted Barack will still win and is still winning if they are included !
If you count popular vote includingthem then you have to included popular vote including cacuse states then Obama leads the pop vote by 2 million.
Barack is 15 delegates away from the majority and only needs 112 total to win the nomination !
Posted by: Another Aussie | May 19, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Racial guilt will trump gender guilt
and Obama will be the nominee come
hell or high water, no matter predictions on the electoral map.
Emotion has always beaten rationality
in the donkey party. That’s why it
will be McCain in Nov. The 2-term
Clinton rule was a bubble in a bathtub.
Posted by: hombre | May 19, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Tina,
Don’t worry about PA. We were smart enough not to go for bush in 2000 or 2004. I only hope that in 2008 more states wise up. mc-more-war would be bush-3. Obama 2008!!
Posted by: pt | May 19, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
This is the same Karl Rove that is about to be called in to Congress??
May 15, 2008
Categories: Bad behavior
Conyers: ‘We’re closing in on Rove’
Just off the House floor today, the Crypt overheard House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers tell two other people: “We’re closing in on Rove. Someone’s got to kick his ass.”
Asked a few minutes later for a more official explanation, Conyers told us that Rove has a week to appear before his committee. If he doesn’t, said Conyers, “We’ll do what any self-respecting committee would do. We’d hold him in contempt. Either that or go and have him arrested.”
Posted by: BostonGlobe | May 19, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
We already know that Obama is unelectable in the general. I am very saddened that the democrats in charge have decided to go with such a weak candidate when there is a much stronger candidate ready, willing and able to lead. If Obama had been vetted before the Feb. primaries, Hillary would have been the clear winner. I am angry at the DNC, Dean, Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy, Edwards, and mostly, the media for being so in love with a loser.
Posted by: Susan | May 19, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Ryan
You list me ANYTHING on McCain’s campaign (outside of the environment) that is close to Hillary’s platform.
McCain promises to continue the war.
Promises to overturn Roe vs. wade
Promises to let the market handle housing, the economy, healthcare. All the same as Bush.
Promises to put in conservative judges.
Promises to keep George Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthy.
Promises to threaten Iran to keep them in check…just like george Bush.
Promises to focus on Iraq when our military is needed desperately elsewhere.
Promises to not approve education opportunities to our vets (because that will take them away from service…you know the service that is overburdened with the war he won’t give a date to).
Promises to keep up the foreign policies that have put us less safe…less economically viable in the world…and keep the world from wanting to “buy American” …or help America…or root for America.
The list goes on.
This election is the easiest one for voters in our history.
If we vote for McCain out of spite we would deserve what we got…
luckily most Hillary supporters are smarter than that…and most Americans have genuinely learned we are not better off voting because someone scared us into it…or out of spite.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
ryan,
What makes McCain so hard to beat? This man’s been in the Senate for decades, a POW so what, when does being a POW make you an expert on foreign affairs? It’s obvious he knows absolutely nothing about the Middle East? McCain, Bush, Rove and Cheney should have studied British History and their attempts to occupy that region. And another question; why didn’t the GOP consider him a strong Presidential candidate 8 years ago? What’s changed in 8 years besides his age…
Posted by: Martin | May 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
If Senator Barack Obama does take the Democratic nomination, all intelligent Democrats will be wishing that we had all listening to Senator Hillary Clinton come Fall. Its not too late!
Vote Hillary America!
Posted by: PhillyPaul | May 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
This is big news from one of the best political minds of our generation.
Obama, more and more every day, looks like one of the most unelectable candidates ever.
Obama is not who he says he is.
Posted by: Lezident | May 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Mccain has already released his plans for what he hopes to have done by the end of his first term if elected..Clinton has proposed ideas and pushed for votes in Congress and pushed for debates..Obama has done nothing but say he wants change..i really dont think he stands much of a chance in the GE..i for one will be voting Mccain..I dont think Mccain has a whole lot in common with Bush other than being republican…similar views, different ways for getting them done..Hillary in 08!! if not, Mccain in 08!!
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Here is a copy of the pledge regarding FL and MI at the start of the race, signed by all candidates running in the Democratic Primary, including Clinton:
Four State Pledge Letter 2008
Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina
August 28, 2007
WHEREAS, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee, along with approval from the full body of the DNC, established the 2008 Presidential nominating calendar in 2005.
WHEREAS, the nominating calendar increases diversity with the early participation of African Americans, Hispanics, Asian Americans, Native Americans and labor members.
WHEREAS, the nominating calendar honors the traditional role of retail politics early in the nominating process.
WHEREAS, the nominating calendar provides geographical balance with contests in the Heartland, East, South and West.
WHEREAS, it is the desire of Presidential campaigns, the DNC, the states and the American people to bring finality, predictability and common sense to the nominating calendar.
WHEREAS, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee will strip states of 100% of their delegates and super delegates to the DNC National Convention if they violate the nomination calendar.
THEREFORE, I _______________, Democratic Candidate for President, in honor and in accordance with DNC rules, pledge to actively campaign in the pre-approved early states Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina. I pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any election contest occurring in any state not already authorized by the DNC to take place in the DNC approved pre-window (any date prior to February 5, 2008). Campaigning shall include but is not limited to purchasing media or campaign advocacy of any kind, attending or hosting events of more than 200 people to promote one’s candidacy for a preference primary and employing staff in the state in question. It does not include activities specifically related to raising campaign resources such as fundraising events or the hiring of fundraising staff.
___________________________ __________
Posted by: BostonGlobe | May 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Rove has McCain losing either way! Obama 08!
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
As the man behind the strategy to energize the Christian Right base of the Republican Party during Bush’s presidency, which proved crucial to Bush’s second presidential victory, the organizational power of Karl Rove should never be underestimated – but overestimation of polling based on his style in 2008 may lead to many a false assumption. Karl Rove was the architect of negative (put on the offensive) style campaigning including some less than “ethical” behind the scenes displays of behavior which can arguably the attributed to declines in the standard of living of many U.S. citizens as well as a less than positive view of this country internationally. One can wander if politics of “illegal child” or slanderous campaign against Max Clellan questioning his patriotism is behind the analysis of who’s likely to beat whom. I hope that 2008 will be absent of Karl Rove tactics, but my hopes in 2000 and 2008 went unanswered and after nearly 8 years of George W. Bush I don’t expect a change in this nation – and should the road Karl Rove et al set this nation on in 2000 continue Obama will be defeated and every one of us in this nation will face far worse than we could have possibly dreamed in 2000. There are few people in this country I feel have damaged the nation as greatly as Karl Rove – George Bush’s brain and well of which he became drunk.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Those of you who think Rove is doing this because the republicans would rather run against Hillary are making a big mistake. While Hillary has baggage, her baggage is old news and and different kind of baggage than Obama. Obama’s baggage has to do with weakness, patriotism, faith, etc. These are all things that bother the moderates and right wing in our country and that is who Obama needs to appeal to win the general. The liberals in the democratic party have done it to us again.
Posted by: Susan | May 19, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Hey DL laugh now, but if Obama gets the nomination, make not mistake about this….all clinton supporters will vote MCCain….and so will independents plus the regular republicans..”Dreams of Obama supporters…goodbye Obama”
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Susan said, “We already know that Obama is unelectable in the general” What in the world are you talking about Susan? Even Karl Rove has Obama beating McCain (and handily at that). McCain is unelectable, not Obama. Obama had 80,000 people come out to hear him speak Sunday. He is most certainly electable, and will be the next President.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Martin, i didnt say Mccain would be hard to beat…it will be hard for Obama to beat him….Hillary will win handily over Mccain but Obama will not..A lot of white people found offense at who Obama associated with and things that he said and things his wife has said..I being one of those people…a lot of people wont vote for Obama plain and simple because he is black, probably as many people wont vote for him because he is black that will vote for him because he is black…Hispanics dont like Obama for the most part, a lot anyway..they would rather see a republican..Obama is just a poison for this country..he divided the dem party and will divide the nation..he will not bring unity
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
New Mexico went to the republicans last time. There is no way Obama will carry NM even with the help of Richardson. Unlike the democratic primaries, the general is winner take all.
Posted by: Susan | May 19, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
pattydaggs – if Clinton supporters would vote for McCain, given our current status in Iraq, global economy, education and unemployment, maybe they really should consider staying Republican after this. It would appear that they are in agreement with that party.
The rest of us will keep trying to change the world.
Posted by: Lynne | May 19, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
If Sen. Obama is the Democratic nominee, it would be a big mistake! West Virginia showed how weak he really is; but media avoided any serious analysis. Sen. Obama lost in evry possible catagory, even younger voters! Having not won even a one major state during the primaries, including California, New York, Texas, Massachusetts, Ohio, Florida, Michigan and now Pennsylvania, how can Sen. Obama be a serious front runner? He manipulated the caucuses with small groups of zealots; but they are not in play for the presidential election. Our media is wrong to ignore the power and the importance of Latino vote; especially in these 08 elections, the largest minority in the country; larger than the black American vote. The Washington media establishment is misleading the country just as usual─ now cheering for Barack Obama are the same people who took us over the cliff in Iraq. Sen. Clinton was able to bring back the Reagan Democrats back into Democratic Party fold, which I think is a huge accomplishment. Sen. Clinton has shown growing support across the demographics, except among African Americans, who have voted mostly for Sen. Obama in overwhelming numbers. But with the solid support from women and Latinos, working Americans, rural Americans, older voters Sen. Clinton is best able to defeat Mr. McCain and the Republicans in the fall. On one on one match ups in many critical states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Michigan, shows that Sen. Clinton is much better-stronger candidate. Mr. Obama’s coalition that giving him the primary victories are the same that gave the nomination to John Kerry. Without winning the major battleground states Pennsylvania and Ohio, Florida and Michigan Sen. Obama is unlikely be a strong candidate against Sen. John McCain. Sen. Obama is in no better situation than John Kerry or Mike Dukakis. The best chance of winning the White House for the Democrats is still with Sen. Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: longtimeWAdem | May 19, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Eric, did you what Rove said..he doesnt have Obama beating Mccain.its other way around buddy…read again….unless my eyes are failing me
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
pattydaggs Obama will win the nomination and the general and Clinton will either be by his side or standing right behind him !
Posted by: Another Aussie | May 19, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
The O man’s empty suite shows more everyday, the Clintons are the best politicians money can buy, and then there’s McLame, Face it, no matter who gets in we all get screwed. Vote out all incumbents and set term limits now.
Posted by: who cares | May 19, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
SO KARL ROVE COMES CLEAN.
CLINTON IS HIS GAL.
ROTFLMAO.
SEN. BYRD OF W. VIRGINIA WENT OBAMA TODAY.
NOW THERE’S A REAL PATRIOT.
From NBC’s Domenico Montanaro
Despite Clinton’s 41-point win West Virginia, Sen. Robert Byrd has thrown his support to Obama. He cites the latest dust up between Obama, Bush and McCain.
“As people all across this great nation know, I have been one of the most outspoken opponents of the Bush Administration’s misguided war in Iraq and its saber rattling around the globe,” Byrd says in a statement released by the campaign. “With the Bush Administration’s latest request to fund this on-going war in Iraq without any attempt to start bringing our troops home, the issue of the upcoming presidential contest has been weighing heavily on my heart. The loss of life continues and the sons and daughters of tens of thousands of American families remain in harm’s way every day.
Posted by: CHUCK | May 19, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Jacob Ezekial
you need to get out mroe
I have been to several dem events in the past week or so…
the majority having older women who were Hillary supporters…out of over a hundred Hillary supporters I saw maybe 3 who were all..”I’mvoting for McCain”
the rest were smart people who are caring and have fought for things like Roe vs. wade healthcare and ending the war for far too long…
The 98 % of those who wanted Hillary and were even frustrated said of course they were voting for obama…
it is only people like yourself on here that say otherwise.
The 3 people who were all ranting and raving about voting for McCain I can clearly say were an embarassment to the rest fo the Hillary crowd.
Most people even if they say it in exit poll to move their candidate forward are smarter than a fifth grader and won’t vote out of spite that their candidate didn’t win the nomination.
Democrats have issues that are too important…and the countries future is too important to vote against all of a person’t other beliefs…all in the name of spite.
That would be childish and stupid.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
I agree Clinton would be the tough one to beat. I think thats why these guys are trying so hard to discourage her and wear her down. OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE
Posted by: Rose | May 19, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Well, I am a democrat who cannot bring myself to vote for the whiny, hypocritical Obama and his surley wife…just can’t do it. The idea scares the hell out of me.
I am one of those MANY Reagan democrats who do NOT want Obama as President!!!
Posted by: barbaraPA | May 19, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
if hillary is more electable she would be winning the nomination….
period
SHE IS NOT AHEAD in the popular vote,
or any other metric she can claim anymore.
She ONLY is ahead in popular vote ONLY, repeat ONLY if she counts Florida and Michigan and gives obama no points out of Michigan.
FURTHERMORE,
she is only ahead then because she
DOESNT COUNT CAUCUS states
so tell me hillary supporters,
how can you flip flop on this issue of count all the votes, but dont count all the votes really?
please… she lost fair and square, she is not more electable in any sense of hte word. Were she to be the nominee she would be buried in years of not experience but years of scandal.
Posted by: bhrandon | May 19, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
longtimeWAdem
You forget, perhaps, the war chest of history that will be in favor of the Republicans should Hillary win the nomination. Just the recent release of her activities and nonest under oath during the grand jury regarding the Rose Law Firm, her refusal to release anything other than an estimate of her current years taxes, the refusal to release the Clinton Library Donor list, Cayman Island off shore accounts, etc. would add to her already shockingly high incredible rating.
Obama took the high road and did not campaign against Clinton’s questionable if not illegal history.
Posted by: Lynne | May 19, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
dl, it would be stupid to not use your brain when it comes to voting..to just go along with the crowd..that would be a stupid wasted vote
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Weather you like Rove or not you had better listen to what he has to say. Rove is the Greenspan of politics and I would not bet aginst him. This is great news for McCain. He has been slipping to the Dems but what do you expect, the dems have had 90% of the media coverage for the last 3 months. Obama is toast even before he starts the general.
Posted by: Billy Bob | May 19, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
yea i trust what rove says!
Posted by: bhrandon | May 19, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Politicians indeed think that we are stupid.
I can draw such graphs in 2 minutes …
What is this Karl Rove & Co (you can register your company in few minutes for few hundred $)?
Once again it proves Republicans do want Obama in the general election. Otherwise, how smart from the GOP strategist to publish data which show the weakness of his candidate; Karl Rove is very bright man and all his actions have only one purpose – to destroy the eligible candidate from Democratic party.
Posted by: George | May 19, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
barbaraPA -
You are right – don’t vote for a whiner:
“This is the vast right wing conspiracy”
Hillary Clinton
“Why do I always get the first question?”
Hillary Clinton
“Do we need to get another pillow?”
Hillary Clinton
“This is the unfair coverage of the press”
Hillary Clinton
Posted by: Lynne | May 19, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Hillary is beating Obama in Kentucky by 36 points. She is also closing the gap in Oregon, which is a very liberal state. The movement is obvious against Obama. That should send a pretty good message to the superdelegates. If he is losing support among democrats, how can he possibly win the general?
Posted by: Susan | May 19, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Oh yes, by all means, let’s listen to what Karl Rove has to say, he’s clearly never been wrong on anything before. Please people, why should anyone listen to this guy?! Let’s try and learn from the mistakes that have been made in the past, otherwise history is doomed to repeat itself.
Posted by: TheatreGal | May 19, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
not just Rove saying this though. Electoral Vote has shown Clinton beating McCain and McCain beating Obama for weeks.
Posted by: Steph | May 19, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
West Virginia only has 5 electoral votes.
In the latest poll, McCain leads Obama by 1 in Ohio.
With no scrutiny what so every his lead is only 1. Obama will win Ohio.
Virginia Obama will win b/c of the AA vote. He can increase the registration of AA democrats in Virginia.
Michigan Obama will win b/c of the college voters/ young vote. In the latest poll, he leads by 2.
After the first Obama/McCain debate Obama will likely recieve 65-70% of Hillary supporters.
The only states he recieve 35% was WV. Every other state were in the margins of 70-75%
Independents still flock to Obama. Obama 60 to McCains 40
And Obama attracts 15-20% of Republicans. Those of which I call Obamaicans.
Posted by: Vanessa | May 19, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Obama is ABSOLUTELY ELECTABLE…80,000 people came out to see him in Oregon. He draws crowds wherever he goes. The guy is brilliant and some people out there just can´t believe that a black man can be so brilliant so they loathe him. Probably the same people that voted for our present religious fundamentalist disaster Bush.
Posted by: George | May 19, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Oh yeh, I’m taking Rove seriously! He knows what he’s talking about! Listen, this is his version of reverse psychology. Get smart, fools, or this man is going to run another scam on America.
Posted by: hang | May 19, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
how trustworthy is this? do we have another source?
Posted by: Brooke | May 19, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Remember, Rove is the same guy who predicted just a couple months ago that Clinton would be the nominee. Rove’s statements are just wishful thinking. The GOP dreads an Obama nomination. They know how to run against Hillary. They can’t figure out Obama.
Posted by: Skeptic | May 19, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Us, Hillary Supporters will NOT be voting for McCain out of spite if Obama is the nominee!!!
We will be VOTING McCain because he is Superior to Obama…
This nomination isn’t over yet…Hillary will pull this out!
Posted by: Jacob Ezekial | May 19, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
dl..keep making up your fanstasy statements. You do not fool anyone..are you working for Obama on this site…if so, bette find another job! You will be looking for one after this election is over!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I think it’s a given that McCain will win in ’08, but I question the wisdom in nominating a 71-year-old. There’s a big difference between 71 and 75 in terms of vitality. I think it’s very likely that he’s a one-term President. Obama isn’t a leader, Hillary Clinton isn’t a leader, and there’s no-one in the GOP who stands out as a leader, other than McCain. So I think the country is in big trouble come 2012.
Posted by: Jim | May 19, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
there are no crazy caucus style votes up for grab for obama this time…he wont be able to beat Mccain…he will never do it..more dirty laundry will come out by then…hope everyone is watching…just a sad day for dems…im proud to say i use my head tho and am not a robot..vote for whom i think will do best for our country..obama surely isnt that man…
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
So, Karl Rove is now God? I won’t put much trust in his analysis and this from the same man who claim during the 2006 Congressional Elections that he had THE Math, guess what whatever math he had was wrong. It will be wrong again.
Posted by: David | May 19, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Ryan
seems I am using my brain…you are part of that crowd I beleive and I am not listening to you.
I just gave you a list of issues that effect our country on a major level where McCain promises the opposite of Hillary Clinton and you come back with …”use your brain and don’t go with the crowd”…
issues…platforms…promises…outlined policies
that is a majority of what you use to choose the job of President.
Yet you want to turn your back on all of those issues and promises that you said you believed in with Hillary and show congress and the rest that those issues aren’t as important to you by voting for McCain.
That is a waste of a vote if you are someone who THINKS and believes in what Hillary Clinton says she believes in.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
The best news on Rove’s map is that it shows that after Obama wins – Karl Rove can no longer jerk our government around and won’t have the power of a corrupt president and vice president to protect him from the basic principles of justice and the jail cell with his name on it.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Can’t see Michelle Obama as a “First Lady” that would really be a joke!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
So, Karl Rove is now God? I won’t put much trust in his analysis and this from the same man who claimed during the 2006 Congressional Elections that he had THE Math, guess what whatever math he had was wrong. It will be wrong again.
Posted by: David | May 19, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Obama will never win Ohio. Ohio will go red in the fall with Obama as the nominee. Ohio did not go for Kerry and that election was rather close. Ohioans always look for substance and that is the least of what Obama has. Even with Clinton pushing for Obama, Ohio will not move to the blue column for Obama. With Repuhlicans like Boehner and Portman and the popular democratic governor Ted Strickland who supported Hillary, Obama will scrounge for votes and may find some in the Cleveland area but most Ohioans will go big time for McCain if Obama is the nominee.
Posted by: Voter | May 19, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Obama is following the Jimmy Carter 1976 trajectory. The fresh outsider face rolls up primary wins and has a lead, and then starts being vetted.
I remember magazine pieces after Carter was well on his way to winning the nomination which asked “Who is Jimmy Carter?” People began to find out and he narrowly defeated Gerald Ford. Then he went on to an infamous term of failure and defeat to Reagan. To be fair, Obama may not turn out to be like Carter — we just don’t know.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 19, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
stevez515: Exactly which map were you looking at? Neither on of these by Karl Rove shpow Obama winning.
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I think Karl Rove and the other GOP, who are all well aware their ‘brand’ is quickly going down the toilet, want people to believe Hillary Clinton can beat John McCain and Obama can’t because they know deep down that it’s the other way around (Obama can beat McCain) and are gonna do anything to avoid having John McCain go up against Obama, as Obama will eat him alive without even breaking a sweat. Now that the primaries are nearing and end and McCain is finally getting checked out by the media and the general public, it’s clear he’s old, out of touch, surrounded by lobbyists, and is going to be another four more years of Bush doctrine if elected. He almost has to play it this way now that he can’t raise any money on his own and is gonna have to rely on his party to fund his campaign (that alone oughta tell people something). And even better, Bush is gonna start fund-raising for McCain which sure as hell ain’t gonna help him. So yes, Karl Rove is a genius, but an evil one that knows if it goes to Obama the Republicans are through. Hillary would be an easy target for them with all the Clinton baggage. Don’t believe anything you read!! The media has severely underestimated the fear-numbed minds of americans and assumes since things like the complex political situation in Iraq is beyond our grasp and we’ll happily swallow up any lies just to avoid having to think a little about stuff. They want us to believe that Obama can’t beat McCain and only Hillary can but they’re all afraid of what will happen if Obama becomes President; Americans who actually engage issues again and aren’t gonna be bullied by the current politics of fear that allowed Bush and friends to take our homes, send our jobs overseas, etc, while we all hid under our beds the past seven years.
Posted by: whooka | May 19, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
yes dl, i might agree but look at the shady character associations that obama has..a very openly racist spiritual advisor that he worshiped with for 20 years..that is something that just cannot be forgiven..especially how he just denounced the man on television after 20 years of loyal service..that shows a coward to me…he couldnt stand by the man anymore…he is a weak coward…i dont believe a thing he says..again…u are going by what the dnc wants to you vote..not by using your brain
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
ryan:
sorry – dirty laundry won’t cut it this time. We, the educated, the youth, the elite, the intelligent, the open minded, the independents… we have changed the way this game is played. Now, when you throw dirt it only makes you look bad and you don’t get a pass when its a 527 or a corrupt president who’s throwing it for you. This election will be different. We’re taking our country back from the special interests, the racists and the two faced politicians.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
West Virginia will not go for McCain. The state has lived with the burden that they put Bush in office in 2000 – while they voted strongly for Hillary, the state (especially with the newly registered) will not make the same mistake. Remember this was a state that split it’s ballot and elected a Democrat Governor, Senator and fed into the “they’ll take your hunting rifle away” and “kill them poor babies inside your daughters”. Politics has been drug out of the pulpits and preachers are being kicked in the rear in politics. About time. Including Karl Rove who several sources, including Christopher Hitchens and “Bush’s Brain” author Wayne Slater, have said that Rove does not believe in god (while he masterminded the Evangelical blinders). It’s time for Obama and for the poster who said he was a foreigner living in this country and that we deserved Obama – you are correct; this country deserves leadership for and by the people.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Patty Daggs
I don’t work for Obama in a paid sense…
but I do work to make sure that people realize when they not thinking clearly and are being blinded by anger and spite.
This country is going down the tubes and I can tell yuo many Hillary supporters are sad to see their fellow supporters putting that spite ahead of their children’s future and what they SAID they believed in.
Character is what you are when no one is in the room.
If your judgements are based on anger at not getting the candidate yuo wanted and not the issues… what does that say about someone’s character.
Our future depends on people having better character than that.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
If Clinton, though a politically miracle, wins Oregon we will be hearing a whole new message that will supersede anything Rove has to say. Obama, the media, the supers, and the DNC will all be whispering to each other, “What the hell do we do now!” Now that would a story!!
Posted by: anotherview | May 19, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
What’s so great and ironic about Rove’s map is that he has McCain losing EITHER WAY! OBAMA ’08!
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Some of you Obama supporters are really mean and angry! Why is it that your boy will get his butt kicked in Nov if he wins the nomination? Thou doest protest too much!!!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
BBLACK …. Hahaa… There are black people dying there too genius
Posted by: tom | May 19, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Sorry folks, Obama sounds like he has policies similar to Hillary but they are very, very different. Obama for one is further to the left of Hillary’s policies. Hillary is more centrist and so is McCain. Obama has tried to copy Hillary’s and Bill’s stances on policies and I believe Obama does not really know what policy he stands for. All that he probably knows is that his two daughters will get a dog if he gets to the White House. Michelle most likely has more stances than Obama and believe me she will be the back seat driver for Obama. Hillary would have been fantastic but Obama with his naive, no stance, no vision personality will be a disaster for America.
Posted by: Voter | May 19, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I feel so energized today. It’s like a dark cloud lifting over the country. In the past few weeks, Clinton and McCain have faded, and along with them the old politics and failed policies are losing ground. Support for Obama is gaining ground, and the tide is turning towards the positive. We’ve had EIGHT LONG YEARS of dark clouds, and I am extremely excited that we’re nearing the end. Come November, this country will be on the right track again. OBAMA 08.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Maybe the Democrats have a grand plan to outdo Rove this time. Hillary is continuing in the race to keep voters excited and paying attention to the Democrats. She and Obama criticize each other as part of the plan. After Obama wins, they get together as the Democratic ticket and show unity at the Democratic Convention. People see them together holding hands and declaring that they are ready to work together for the good of America. Now you have the Obama and Clinton supporters vs the hobbling republican party. That might change Mr Rove’s map.
Posted by: ms1236 | May 19, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
TOM: 10 TO 1: HA/HA
Posted by: BBLACK | May 19, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Where in the He!! do you people get the impression from Karl Roves Map that Obama will win? Neither of the maps have Obama winning.
Posted by: lou | May 19, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Good for him has anyone told himm this is over ……
Posted by: a person who cares about the future | May 19, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Let’s face it, McCain couldn’t win against anyone.
1) Bush’s negative wake
2) He’s got weak GOP support
3) He’s got more dirt than most candidates
4) He flies off the handle WAY too often
5) He’s not charismatic
6) His statements contradict WAY too often
7) The only reason he is where he is, is because of a large political machine.
I support none of the potential presidential candidates.
Write in Vote for me: Rob
Posted by: Rob | May 19, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Sorry patty – its the frustrated feminists in Hillary’s camp who seem to have the most venom. They take the lead from Hillary at every turn of some great sex-wing conspiracy to steal the nomination when she was just beaten by a superior candidate who ran a superior campaign. The inane dysingenuous arguments about Michigan and Florida are embarrassing. Now those voters have a decision to make, hopefully, they’ll calm down and be able to make a rational one.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
BBLACK — You are so obviously a McCain supporter. You Republicans have nothing better to do than try to disrupt this election? Obama will be the next President, and he’ll be a great one at that. I guess you fools can have your fun now, because you’re in for a huge loss in Congress and the Presidency.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
DL get real..your candidate is a loser! He has so much dirty baggage and more dirty baggage yet to come out. He has associations with the scum of the earth…he has a wife who sound just like Wright…the list goes on. And you expect someone with intelligence to vote for this …you want this liar for your President? Well, you are not playing with a full deck of cards if you think that Obama’s record even beats that of Bush! Even Bush isn’t that bad!!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Seems to me Obama without the black vote isn’t likely to win…
Posted by: Eliza | May 19, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
ryan – thats a great post, very funny. You start with a rational premise about divisiveness and finish with an ignorant racist slur. You must be quite conflicted.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Ryan
You can’t be that misinformed (I am not saying that to be insulting) that you don’t know the Clintons and the lists of shady characters…
Obama has 1000′s of associations…just like anyone.
If I ran for office… I am sure they could dig up an old coach or (my minister for that matter that use to preach against gays) or even my Dad…who is known for saying “we should just blow up the whole middle east…screw em…and drop a bomb on themchinese as well”
I love my dad but I probably could not run for President because of him.
It is what he says and “preaches” so to speak that matters…
Obama’s actions have never shown any cohesion between he and those shady characters…besides some stupid 1/2 acre land thing… that is just stupid… If that is the worst unscrupulous action in all of Obama’s political history… it is nothing compared to McCain or Clinton’s…
now it is right now in our history about …the war… the economy…healthcare out of control…our sinking standing and subsequent loss of security and help from nations around the world.
Those need to be priority numero uno.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Obama is inevitable.
I don’t understand how anyone could be interested in anything Karl Rove has to say about anything. Shouldn’t he have been arrested many months ago? And the media channels who quote him and quote him – I just don’t tune them in anymore.
ABC News is an absolute farce. DOESN’T ANYONE NOTICE??
If you’re not outraged you’re not paying attention.
Posted by: Jim | May 19, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
The only politician in America with higher negatives that George Bush is Hilary Clinton…..Obama has a MUCH broader appeal than HRC….Please no more Clinton’s or Bush’s. American needs a change from the status quo. Hilary on the ballot in November is a guaranteed loss for the Democrats.
Posted by: directdial | May 19, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Is this the same Karl Rove who was dead wrong in his predictions for the 2006 election? He was predicting a GOP net win, against the opinions of all others, and he proved to be way off the mark. I thought that proved once and for all the myth of “boy genius,” exposing Karl Rove as the mere cheating thug he has always been. Given his deviousness, he is now playing “don’t throw the rabbit in the briar patch,” as he knows Clinton as nominee would be a far better chance fora Republican win (given her emense baggage and the lack of anything to go after Obama with), and so typical to his lying and scheming broadcasts just the opposite in hopes of increases the odds for Clinton. What a slimmy scum this ugly fat Karl Rove is–he should be setting in jail for his past crimes, like outing Valerie. Our nation cannot get rid of this fat Rove slim fast enough, given all the damage he enabled by bringing to power the Bush crime family.
Posted by: Nomas | May 19, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Obama will probably not win Ohio, Florida, and PA; whereas, Clinton could easily win them. There are other states that Rove has in Obama’s column that I don’t think will be there, either.
Not only is Clinton better qualified, she is more attractive to a broad range of voting Democrats.
Posted by: Two-cats | May 19, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
CLINTON SUPPORTERS UNITE! SEND A MESSAGE TO THAT JERK HOWARD DEAN AND THE ENTIRE DNC. NOMINATE OBAMA AND WE HILLARY SUPPORTERS WILL ABANDON THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN DROVES. WE WILL VOTE A SOLID REPUBLICAN TICKET IN CONGRESS AS WELL.
SEND A MESSAGE TO THE DNC. AND WE’LL HAVE HILLARY IN 2012!
Posted by: The truth be told | May 19, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
if obama gets the nod..I am voting for clinton…and so will the majority of the much needed latino swing vote…the DNC will regret choosing obama
Posted by: CLINTONORMACCAIN | May 19, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
NAJ,
No its not but white folk like me united with black folk, asian folk, indian folk and mexican folk Obama will win.
Not about race its about ending this dumb war making America the country its meant to be!
Posted by: Another Aussie | May 19, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Rove should be writing from jail. Who cares what a Fox in the henhouse thinks? Up is down and around is under for anyone who left their neocon decoder ring at home. And Rove is full of it. Please get this traitor to our nation security out of our headlines.
Posted by: Sara B. | May 19, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Rove is one evil SOB, but he does know his profession.
He got the Shrub elected and re-elected, after all.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | May 19, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
More important: Hillary is the better candidate!
Posted by: Sylvia from Oslo | May 19, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Women have always stood for more sensible decisions. They see the disaster that Obama will bring that would cause havoc on the future of their children. They look helplessly at the two evils and decide which one is lesser. Obama will bankrupt our nation. He has no vision for our economy. He talks about bringing the troops home and says that he will send them back in if Al Queda goes back into Iraq. He is yet to find out that Al Quaeda is already in Iraq. Next we will have Hamas coming as his guest to the White House. Is anyone kidding me? McCain is a thousand times better than Obama. Atleast we will know what to expect and prepare ourselves for it. He is known to be fair and ethical. Obama, we know will bring change. Obama we know is a person of contrasts — He talks ethics and yet he lied about his association with Rezko. He talks of family and yet he threw his grandmother and Wright under the bus when it suited him. He talks of openness and yet he destroyed all the papers associated with his Illinois senate years. What change? Am I willing to sacrifice the lives of our children? Not in a million years!
Posted by: Voter | May 19, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
When John McCain is being sworn in the democrats can’t say they weren’t warned!
Posted by: Mark | May 19, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Yup, you’re right Obama cannot win without the black vote (Same could be said for Hillary). Fortunately, Obama doesn’t have to win with only the black vote. He has independents like me and young people and increasingly will win over open-minded blue collar, elderly and religious conservatives who think that the current strategy of let the poor starve, the inner cities and the public schools fail, and our soldiers dying without a reason is worse than what Obama will bring to the presidency. And it will be fun to watch the racists and the republicans writhe.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Too those Obama supporters who think every Hillary supporter is angry..get over yourself. We Clinton supporters who is the best for this country and it is not Obama! We want to guard this country against people like him! And if it comes to McCain..then he will get the votes! At least we know what Clintons and McCain’s baggage is and their baggage is angelic compared to Obama’s baggage! They do not have ties to terrorists and anti American friends!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
NO WAY OBAMA CAN WIN. he’s only capitalized on the RICH AND BLACK VOTE…I AM NEITHER…CLINTON OR I GO FOR REPUBLICANS!
Posted by: macy | May 19, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
There is no honesty, no ethics in counting Michigan. And the rules were laid out at the beginning. So….Clinton and her supporters want Michigan to count. Just proves beyond a doubt that she and her supporters are lieing cheaters. We all know perfectly well that in the reverse…if Obama was behind and wanted votes to count where Hillary wasn’t on the ballot….she’d be screamiong, crying, threatening to sue. It’s hard to be gracious to her at the end because of the hateful way she ran her campaign.
Posted by: Nancy | May 19, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
UM BLUECOLLAR VOTE CLEARLY REJECTS OBAMA..LOOK AT THE VOTES
Posted by: TBO | May 19, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
The NY Times had an article on media sexist bias against Hillary. This is most evident in MSNBC – Chris Mathews etc. It has been vicious and contibuted directly to the results. Compared to that Fox News (believe it or not) has been quite even).
These attackes against Hillary have made those who voted for her pretty mad.
If the J. Wright story broke out a liitle earlier in the primaries, Obama would have been swept out.
Posted by: Gary Black | May 19, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
It only makes sense that Clinton would do better in the GE than Obama. If the dem primaries were counted like the GE she would have won.
Posted by: jim | May 19, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Really, big surprise. Karl Rove sends out information that makes the Hillary/Obama discussion linger on. Am I the only person that see’s through this. Republicans are shaking in their boots at the response Obama is creating and they would rather Hillary battle them in the Fall. Their ammo on the clintons is 5 miles long, Obama not so long.
Posted by: Brian | May 19, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
as a Latino..my vote goes for Clinton..if not Mccain appeals to me..Obama can keep his poor of excuse for a latino VP Richardson…we didn’t want him before..we don’t want a judas now..
Posted by: Juan | May 19, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Hillary won all the battle ground states- barack obama lost badly. To vote for this man is a dangerous mistake. Hillary and only Hillary can defeat Mccain in Nov. Vote smart vote Hillary!
Posted by: andrea | May 19, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
ryan,
Since your vote in based on judgment, are you judging Senator Obama’s opponents based on their associates too… Senator Clinton’s association with “Whitewater & Mr. Hsu” and Senator McCain’s association with this President speaks on his judgment.
With regards to what Michelle Obama mentioned or even what Rev. Wright preached on, this country has created its own enemies. In the history of the world the United States dropped two nuclear bombs (WMD’s) and didn’t blink to consider the aftermath, we supported Slavery, legalized lynching, conducted genocide on Native Americans, allow home grown terrorist (i.e. KKK) to thrive on this soil, permitted segregation, support government terrorist organizations (i.e. CIA and Blackwater), even allowed US Citizens to suffer in Louisiana (Katrina), that’s just to name a few of America’s proud moments.
Learn more about your country…
Posted by: Martin | May 19, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Mark – And, when we continue to be mired in Iraq after 2013…and when our deficits continue to mount…and when our military quality continues to slip…and when our health care program worsens….and when our infrastructure continues to fail… can we say: You weren’t warned.
Posted by: 63tango | May 19, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
macy
I hope you have some money saved away if mccin wins and this war continues and the dollar get lower aswell as the value of your house. I hope you dont have kids that will have to go to this war or the next (iran) when they bring in the draft! Thats what a vote for mccain means !
Posted by: Another Aussie | May 19, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
dl, you are wrong..the fact that obama went to this church for 20 years, called this man his spiritual advisor and even had this man baptize his children pretty much says they were tight as can be…come off it..obama knew what wright was preaching and was there supporting for 20 years
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
ryan
I love atlanta – lived in decatur for quite some time (many years ago). Still miss Stone Mountain, camping in the north georgia mountains and rafting down the chattahoochee.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Keep in mind that Rove is the Master Trickster who put GWB in office.
He does NOT have Democrats’ best interests in mind.
And he and the GOP would dearly love to face off vs. Clinton. They’ve long viewed her as the weakest Dem candidate, and they harbor long grudges from pre-2000.
She’s also not really vetted: Obama hasn’t raised issues re her “dirty laundry” – nor would any Dem candidate have done so, since it makes the entire party (and the last Dem presidency) look bad.
But the GOP would have a field day with everything that Dems have ignored, plus the current Calif case re: illegal fundraising for her Senate run, integrity issues, campaign misspeaks/gaffes, leadership temperament, actual experience, Bill’s lobbying conflicts of interest + potential White House interference …
Posted by: alexia | May 19, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
The Republicans will stop at nothing to try to get Hillary as their opponent because they KNOW they can beat her into the ground with all the “stuff” they have on her.
Sen. Obama will be a much more formidable opponent.
Posted by: ChefJune | May 19, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
as a Florida DEM I will go Republican if OBAMA is chosen…that scam artist has tried everything to block my vote..most of my community rejects him as an elitist the DNC better get their act together and CHOOOSe CLINTON!
Posted by: ANGRYFLORIDIAN | May 19, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
The typical blue collar worker would never vote for the elitist Obama. Now he is complaining about someone playing the comments his hate filled wife said. What a loser!
Posted by: steveinPA | May 19, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Don’t believe that Obama “DREW A HUGE CROWD” in Oregon. Those people were bussed and flown in from all over the country to act like Obama drew a huge crowd. That was probably everyone he has voting for him. They all had to show up to make people think he is a popular condidate. I know many people that have been running all over the country for months now! Isn’t it funny that the news programs all HAD to mention how many people there were in the crowd. Just more PR. Won’t work for us. Hillary is the only answer for this country.
Posted by: ClintonsAgain | May 19, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
And we should trust the republicans why? LMAO! Come on folks. If this was really true and they believed Clinton would be stronger, then they would be doing every thing possible to help get Obama elected! WAKE UP! If any thing this tells me they really are afraid of Obama!
Posted by: IndieVisible | May 19, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
CLINTON OR MCCAIN!
Posted by: THEWAY | May 19, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Obama sounds just like a dream machine with no reality he always manages to get away with his nice words but he never answered or faced real questions people will have to look in to this guy he is a total failure his history is so bad i would be a shame if he would be the president in my country
Posted by: Sam | May 19, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
I like Atlanta too, but if you think for a minute that the ghetto population (primarily black) is not tearing this city down, then you are mistaken..that is why they are being pushed out of the city limits..so we can clean up after their mess…making good safe subdivisions here again so the kids can run the street instead of having to be scared of being shot or raped by some gang…im not afraid to say im happy that the Atlanta city officials are raising property and sewer taxes to get rid of the ghetto trash and send them out to i dont really care where…
Posted by: ryan | May 19, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Martin,
Speaks the truth !!!
Posted by: Another Aussie | May 19, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
All anybody needs to do is look at Rove’s Meet The Press interview back in 2004 when Tim asked Mr Rove if he thought H Clinton would run in 2008. The Glee Mr. Rove tried to contain at that prospect was evident to all that watched.
As a GOP operative his singular objective is for a GOP win. I am curious why this article did not mention that it is very likely that Mr. Rove wants A) McCain to go against H Clinton in the GE and/or B) Mr. Rove would like to keep the Democratic Primary going as long as possible to give Mr. McCain as much time as possible to get his political house in order before the GE.
Posted by: BonVivant | May 19, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Karl Rove is full of BS. Bill Clinton received 36% of the white vote in 1992 and got 81% of the black vote and became president. Most Democrat candidates for president usually don’t get a large percentage of the white vote and need a large percentage of the black vote. I don’t know why Obama is being held to a different standard.
Posted by: Lisa Hampton | May 19, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
alexia: So true!
Posted by: Great Caesar's Ghost | May 19, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
shouldn’t carl rove be in jail? didn’t he get convicted..
Posted by: bonnie | May 19, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
if OBAMA WINS..I VOTE REPUBLICAN.
Posted by: AJAXD | May 19, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Great! Now the Democrats should follow Karl Rove. He’s given them an asskicking in the last two pres. elections.
Also, I find it odd that Hillary supporters, especially women, would threaten to stay home and not vote or even vote for McCain if Hillary is not the Dem. candidate. If McCain becomes President, Roe v. Wade WILL be overturned.
I am an Obama supporter but will vote for Clinton if she is the Nominee. It would be ashamed if the people who worked so hard for women’s rights were responsible for the reversal of one of their most important advancements.
Posted by: roevwade | May 19, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
WOW!!! I am truly blown away by SOME of what I have read. This is 2008 and we – “Americans” have the nerve to look puzzled or diagree when they say that PREJUDUCE still exists in this country. This is TRULY amazing to me. I would think by now people would be judged on “THEIR” character or merits not the color of their skin. I am DEEPLY ashamed. EVERYONE knows that the principal views and stance on the most relevent current issues are VERY, VERY similar for both D-Candidates. That’s why Hillary was trying to sell the “Clinton/Obama ticket” not so long ago. Why can’t you guys let the process take it’s course and have it decide the winner?? AND you guys support it. It’s the Democratic way. We did. I am a REPUBLICAN and I WOULD NEVER sell out my party. Where’s your committment to the issues you claim are SOOO IMPORTANT. Are they important ONLY if Hillary is the one that’s proclaiming/proposing the change? Hypocrisy!!! You democrats are going to crash and burn come election and it won’t be because O’bama is unelectable. I extend to you an invitation.. by all means..PLEASE VOTE FOR MCCAIN!!! He is the better candidate. AND…Guess What??HE’S WHITE!! You gotta love him!!
Posted by: Ashamed | May 19, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
AJAXD: You were going to vote for McCain anyway.
Posted by: Great Caesar's Ghost | May 19, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Great! Now the Democrats should follow Karl Rove. He’s given them an asskicking in the last two pres. elections.
=======================
but his predictions and his little crazy scribblings have always been right on target, huh?
Posted by: bottom line | May 19, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
And we should trust the republicans why? LMAO! Come on folks. If this was really true and they believed Clinton would be stronger, then they would be doing every thing possible to help get Obama elected! WAKE UP! If any thing this tells me they really are afraid of Obama!
Posted by: IndieVisible | May 19, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Juan – you indicate that the Latino (at least your) vote would be for McCain and against Obama and his supporter Richardson (by the way Richardson will not be Obama’s VP selection). You should consider that the Republican’s and their CIA operatives that supported the dictatorship in Guatemala killed tens of thousands (and we’ll just leave Nicaragua and Honduras alone for right now) and remember that immigration in this nation is dysfunctional and in 2000 during the budget stalemate after GWB was elected he promised Clinton he would clean-up the INS – in March he extened the LIFE act to April 30th (with tens of thousands unable to process paperwork – don’t you recall the lines around INS on midnite?) and the backlog grew and grew (with thousands of valid applications shredded in the San Diego office – to reduce backlog) and the dysfunction continued for 7 more years and the fence is being errected and we still have multi-billion dollar coporations bringing in “skilled tech” labor while retrained unemployed US workers cannot get those jobs and crops dying on the trees or in the ground because it takes 60 days to get ag workers. In a country that has used immigration as de facto slave labor I think you need to revisit history before casting your ballot – I sincerely hope so.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
To Obama Supporters,
It’s a bluff. Hillary supporters WILL vote Obama come November. It’s their way of scaring the DNC to nominate Hillary. Don’t try to “DE-sway” them, they’ll come around eventually.
Posted by: Vanessa | May 19, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Let’s hope the DNC has access and is looking at realistic polling about which candidate is more electable. Lately, I think that all they see are the dollar signs reflected in their eyes – seduced by the obscene amounts of money Obama has raised. Too bad for Obama that cash doesn’t necessarily translate into votes.
If he wonders about that, Obama and the DNC can just ask Mitt Romney.
Posted by: s. Valenti | May 19, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Switch the “R” to “The End” of Rove and it spells “Over” which is why Carl is where he is today. Goodbye…so long…get lost you naughty boy!!! :~(
Rove, your strategic plan ran its course a long time ago. Take a nap and invite McBush to tag along with you. You are FINISHED. Good riddance!!! :~(
Posted by: 1968WhoWasI | May 19, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I’d trust a republican before trusting OBAMA..OBAMA IS FULL OF BS and he has WAY 2 MANY TERRORIST TIES ALL OVER
Posted by: YB | May 19, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
THIS HAS THE “DARK SIDE” OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WRITTEN ALL OVER IT. LIKE ROVE IS EVER GOING TO, ” NOT BE UP TO SOMETHING.”
HE’S A SNAKE. I’D TAKE THE DEVIL OVER HIM ANY DAY.
Posted by: DAVID NH | May 19, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
The question has always been who can win the election in November, not who can win a popularity contest now. Check out another ELECTORAL MAP site
Posted by: StopandThink | May 19, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
You Obama supporters are extremely delusional and arrogant to think you can win this election without Hillary supporters. Hello she has 17 million. If 25 to 30% defect to McCain it’s all over Obama will lose by a landslide. Its pretty clear Obama can only win caucus states and none of the big battleground primary states. That’s pathetic.
Posted by: MR | May 19, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
My plan B in the event that the DNC fails to wake up and nominate Hillary Clinton -
vote for the other principled, experienced candidate in this race – John McCain.
Posted by: s. Valenti | May 19, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
OBAMA IS A CROOK!
CLINTON 08
Posted by: LC | May 19, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
To all those that believe at this point that hillary will somehow NOW win…
Even if she were to steal the nomination today, she wouldn’t win squat!
And to those that think she could still win, keep dreaming, you all have become delusional. She’ll be lucky to keep her Senate seat….and don’t say I didn’t warn ya!
Posted by: LA in Indiana | May 19, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
First, Steppie Stephanopolous has to blow whisper kisses at SHUN SANITY to get his talking points and now the abc snooze network has to roll out karl roves latest piehole drool. America is ready to landslide BOBO the wonder squirrel against McCain but the networks hate a landslide and will do all they can to prop up McCain. Watch them…bushbaby and cheney will save the day in their special way eventually…
Posted by: daddyblue | May 19, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Rove is a snake in the grass. Yeah, I’m sure he has the Democrat’s best interest in mind. Right. I would never trust ONE WORD coming from Rove’s mouth. NEVER.
Posted by: Tom | May 19, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Karl Rove stating that Clinton would be a stronger candidate is the best reason I can think of to vote for Obama, because Rove’s primary goal is not to tell the truth.
Posted by: billp | May 19, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Karl Rove is no honest Abe. It is wishful thinking not a scientific poll that is the real reason for the conclusion. Republicans are loosing and the only hope they have is if they can run against Hillary. In either case McCain has very little chance and he can continue his Iraq war as a senator and let us see whether in 2013 he can bring back the troops. His campaign will be pitiful as there will be no decent person to run it as one by one all of them will be running away because of their past sins. So Rove can keep roving and expect that his sins of electing and re-electing Bush get washed away but that will never happen. His hands are blood stained.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | May 19, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
you’ve got to love obama fans…
if they don’t like the news they don’t argue the points, they cry and whine and claim they are victimized.
oops, they are just like obama!
Posted by: trettin | May 19, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
I am one dem who will be voting for McCain in the general election. Sorry to burst your bubble Vanessa.
Posted by: Terry | May 19, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
We didn’t need Rove to tell us Obama is in a world of trouble.I know many Democrats who have told me that there is no way they will ever vote for Obama. The Republicans will be able to do what Democrats are afraid to do, they will play tapes and videos of Obama in his own words stating that his grandmother is a typical white person or that white folks’ greed runs a world in need. These comments are only the tip of the iceberg. As one Republican said, we’ll make the swiftboat operation look like a public service announcement.
Posted by: dds | May 19, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
You might say that averaging polls is unscientific. Look at the final RCP projection for 2004.
The only state this method got wrong was Wisconsin.
My best guess is that averaging has a way of minimizing the biases extant in each polling method. Obviously this isn’t proof that it works; not enough examples. But it’s a reason to pay attention to averaging. Given how close the method was in 2004, suggests that it may have some value.
Posted by: soccer dad | May 19, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Us Hillary supporters better unite with Obama or it will be another 4 or 8 years of Bush corruption. McCain is tied in with the Bush crime family no ifs ands or buts so you disgruntled Hillary supporters better get a grip and fall in line with Obama.
Posted by: MR | May 19, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Clinton people count votes like Bill Clinton plays golf–they cheat–Florida and Michigan don’t count and if they do then caucus states votes should be counted–a vote is a vote. Obama runs better on the west coast and mid west and will carry the rust belt states but maybe by not as much as CLinton. Mr. Rove will have a lot more time to do this after he’s in jail for the US attorney scandal, particularly the version for Alabama. No third term for Bush with McCain and no third term for Bill with Hillary.
Posted by: bhciapol | May 19, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
As if you can believe anything Rove says, writes, thinks, mumbles. He’s just trying to damage Obama. By the way, Obama’s going to win. Easily.
Posted by: Dem in Chicago | May 19, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
That says a lot. The Republicans would LOVE to run against Hillary and are puzzled about Obama’s campaign.
Rove and Hillary are keep trying to change the rules until they get her the nomination that’s for sure. Kind of like watching Pat Buchanan or Lou Dobbs…they don’t like anything or anybody but themselves.
Posted by: A Former Republican | May 19, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Karl Rove may not be the most popular person, but he knows politics. He knows that Hillary would be harder to beat in the general election. He can say that without fear because he knows (as everybody else knows) that the DNC has been pulling for Obama since day one. The DNC know longer cares about the party faithful and their real base. They think that 1/2 of the democrats pulling for Clinton will come out and vote for Obama. Most will not and John McCain will win in the general election. What a shame. The DNC keeps throwing elitist snobs at us (Kerry – Obama). They just don’t know how to win. They think that if they pander to black voters, young voters, new voters, etc. that they will win. NOT!!!
Posted by: IBFAY | May 19, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Predict all you want Karl Rove. McCain will lose.
Posted by: Enrique | May 19, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Karl Rove’s information is flawed and rooted particially in the racist outcomes of some of the past election results…Now, when Karl Rove lay off his criticism of senator Obama with Sean Hannity and stirring up negatives feelings, then perhaps his little study may be a bit more accurate…..
The GOP featuring the likes of Rove will lose BIG TIME in November….They recently loss a congressional seat in Mississippi….These nasty attacks against senator Obama and his wife will bring demise to the GOP…..some who are a bunch of losers….So, keep doing your sorry study Rove….Just remember it is contaminated with racism….
Posted by: tony | May 19, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Eric – Do you know how to read? McCain is beating Obama according to Rove.
Posted by: Susan | May 19, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
USVET:
Three words:
YOU ARE WRONG
Posted by: ArmyVet | May 19, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Bottom Line,
Surely Karl Rove would not have an agenda, and is always truthful and honest and especially helpful to the Democrats. How silly of me to forget that.
Posted by: roevwade | May 19, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I am going through this whole process with open eyes and ears and am happily voting for Barack Obama. He’s our only hope now for putting this country back in order.
Posted by: George | May 19, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
To those Obama supporters who believe Hillary’s supporters will ultimately come back to Obama, don’t count on it. Remember, Hillary is a moderate, and many of her supporters are moderate. Many of Hillary’s supporters think that McCain’s positions are closer to theirs than are the positions of Obama.
Obama’s ardent supporters think the Iraq war is issue number 1, and Hillary’s vote on the war in 2002 is enough to disqualify her as a candidate. But, most of the country was initially behind the war, and turned against it only when it was clear the Bush administration had bungled it. They give Hillary a pass on the Iraq vote.
So, it comes down to basic positions on issues, and McCain is closer to the positions of moderate voters than Obama.
Posted by: David H | May 19, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Close your eyes and just try and imagine Michelle Obama in the Whitehouse. She would be the most disrespected first lady this country has ever had.
Posted by: JillR | May 19, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Rove is a Republican…..Whatever he says helps Republicans……He’s a LIAR……Old school politics isn’t going to work in 2008….THE MAP HAS CHANGED…..Obama will win against McCain in the biggest LANDSLIDE IN US HISTORY!
Posted by: bernie | May 19, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
for the first time I will vote for republican, no way I will vote for obama, many of people in california I know won’t vote for him either, he will lose california, period. mccain will take the state, what a change.
Posted by: georgia | May 19, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
I’m pretty sure that all the people claiming to be Democrats who say that they’ll be voting for McCain if Obama gets the nom are just a bunch of lying Republicans anyway. No real Dem wants to see another Republican in the White House ever again.
Posted by: Leo Rossiter | May 19, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Rove is a REPUBLICAN strategist who will say anything he thinks can influence the pysche of the average dumbed-down voter. Remember, this is the same Karl Rove who predicted the GOP would hold on to the House and the Senate in 2006 based on “his numbers”. A few years and a landslide later, he’s still trying to sell the same snake-oil.
No thanks. I’m with Obama.
Posted by: Girgadis | May 19, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Obama is dangerous! Obama refers to former president, John F. Kennedy, as diverting us from WW3 when the missiles were in Cuba. That’s Bull! Kennedy caused the Cuban guerrillas to be slaughtered as a trade off. He never sent in the marines to back up the guerrillas to back up the Cuban army which was the Bay of Pigs invasion. The Soviets, removed the missiles from fear of nuclear attack that JFK threatened them with.
Posted by: Christie | May 19, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Tony at 4:07 – The seat that was picked up in Mississippi was INSPITE OF OBAMA NOT BECAUSE OF OBAMA. Actually the guy is a conservative Democrat is the reason he won. Most people are more moderate and moving to the middle – democrats and republicans. That is why 1/2 of the party supports Clinton. She is more centrist! Anyway, that guy in Mississippi had to distance himself from Obama. Watch the news.
Posted by: ibfay | May 19, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
It’s funny to see all these Obama supporters carry on about racism. Where was your outrage when Obama spewed some of the greatest bigotry ever to come out of the mouth of a presidential candidate. If the media was not in his corner, he would have been drummed out of the race long ago.
Posted by: bedy | May 19, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
“We are apt to be deluded into false securtiy by political catch-words devised to flatter than instruct.” this describes Obama. Just catch-words, no substance.
Posted by: Russ | May 19, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Leo…there are a lot of stupid people in the world…sad to think they would prefer McCain….but this is why our country is where it is….stupidity
Posted by: truthtell | May 19, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
I thought it would be a cold day in Hell before I ever sided with an argument posed by Karl Rove and crew. Hell has frozen… his “non-scientific” stats make sense. Obama will not win the general despite what Dean’s cronies say. When Florida and other key states go to McCain, who will be screaming then?!?
Posted by: SistaChristianLouboutin | May 19, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Just-Listen: When making accusations (which are false to begin with) at least get basic facts straight. There are 55 Islamic countries (not 57) and if I were to list Hillaries mis-spokens as well as Senator McCain’s I am sure those on this board would be bored. Look up: and P.S. Senator Obama clearly stated this morning on ABC that he was a Christian and remarked the role Christ played in his life. I think it is well that ignorance and political spin be replaced with some measure of decent behavior towards someone who clearly is trying to make things better for our nation rather than make false accusations based on false figures.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Hillary supporters need to unite with Obama or this country is deep trouble with that moron McCain. I can’t believe anyone would even consider electing a republican after all the crimes they have committed against humanity. History will be very harsh on the GOP with their dismal record of failure.
Posted by: MR | May 19, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I still don’t care WHO wins the Democratic nomination – they are both GREAT candidates and I will happily vote for either one of them. The one thing I will NOT do is vote for another Republican ever again for as long as I live! I hate the GOP like poison.
Posted by: Rachel M. | May 19, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
RIIIIIGHT… whatever you say Rove.
And to us fools.. if this was TRUE, you think Rove would open his mouth about this ever so often.
Plus he is throwing this out there to freeze the superdelegates , at least he is hoping for . so the Democrats will continue its fighting.
Come November just like hope 3 Republicans lost there seat .
when people walk into that voting booth 2 choices. Bush for 4 more years or a new CHANGE in policies and direction.
People are in for a rude awakening
John MC-Bush will be blown away.
Posted by: cyber-relic | May 19, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Every immigrant when they want to become US citizen they have to know how many states in the US.
Obama is not an immigrant he should know better than foreigner.
How’d come Obama does not know?
How he counted into 57 states?
Posted by: catleya | May 19, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
John has his temper in ckeck for now. He will huff & puff and he will blow and the deck of cards wil come tumbling down. Just you wait and see.
Posted by: Flatly | May 19, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Well, I’ll take Michelle Obama any day over a self-confessed drug addict like Cindy McCain who stole prescription drugs from a nursing home resident and who refuses to tell us how her husband is benefitting from her money. I am fed up with Republicans who think they are above the rules. Plus, didn’t Rove make some ridiculous predictions about Repubs recently–that were totally off-base?
Posted by: Mike Filancia | May 19, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
For your information, The Organization of the Islamic Conference, an international organization with a permanent delegation to the UN lists 57 Islamic nations.
Posted by: dds | May 19, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
clinton supporters will not support Obama and why should we, the guy blast her and her man calling them racist, when he himself is one. Oh i forgot he said he didn’t know about his preacher. Give me a break! On top of all this the women are going to be flipping mad , cus Obama and his camp along with his Media affiliates use sexist remarks, they call poor people stupid ,putting up photos of Hilbillies and portraying them as stupid clinton supporters. Now he wants our help. I will vote for McCain b4 I vote for this flip flopping do what ever i can propaganda!
Posted by: DW | May 19, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
DW…I suppose HRC had nothing but good things to say about Obama…she just sat back and knit stockings…come on…get real
Posted by: truthtell | May 19, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
roves october surprise,michelle at the church railing on about white people.yea a great first lady.rove has the tape.
Posted by: don tufts | May 19, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Billy Bob – Greenspan was not infallible. He underestimated the gravity of the subprime mortgage issue.
Rove is primarily a clever political marketing strategist. He help bring us Bush, Cheney …and the Iraq misadventure…which voters supported twice. Please don’t tell me you were one of those who applauded “Freedom Fries”…and poured expensive bottles of French wine into the gutters.
Posted by: 63tango | May 19, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
DW – I seriously doubt that you’re a Democrat OR a Clinton supporter. We REAL Dems know that beating the GOP is more important than throwing temper tantrums. I support Hillary, too, but I will vote for WHOEVER my party nominates because the stakes are just too high to ever elect another incompetent Republican like Bush again!!!
Posted by: Janie Says | May 19, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
JillR:
Why don’t you close your eyes and try and imagine you in the White House….
If you can do that, then back off Michelle Obama and you run..
Just keep in mind: I will not vote for you…..Why? ’cause after mouthing off about the beautiful and highly intelligent wife of senator Obama wife, you will not get my vote….
So, just keep imagining…okay
Posted by: Shalom | May 19, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
what a contaminated source, this is the man who put cia operatives in danger by exposing one of them for political reasons. wake up america this man cannot be believed.
Posted by: marty | May 19, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Ok…who are you hurting by voting for McCain…not Obama. He will be long gone and back in the Senate. So will Hillary. But you will loose your house, you cannot work due to gas prices, your kids will be in a war for 10 more year( 8000 more lives lost), and you cannot afford food.OH YEA…that was smart!!!
Posted by: newthought | May 19, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Whether Hillary supporters are as bigoted as Obama supporters is open to debate. What is not open to debate is the fact that Obama and his supporters get a total pass by the MSM and editorial boards of this country when it comes to his bigoted statements.
Posted by: dds | May 19, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
DDS – you stated: For your information, The Organization of the Islamic Conference, an international organization with a permanent delegation to the UN lists 57 Islamic nations……Well again anti-Karl Rovians pull anything from the hat to prove absolutely nothing: Wrong. Google results: Organisation of The Islamic ConferenceAssociation of 56 Islamic states promoting Muslim solidarity in economic, social, and political affairs. [Arabic, English, French]
……NOTE the number is 56…..wrong again, keep trying. And by the way, who cares? The real point is the Karl Rovian style of politics, anti-Obama smear throw the mud and hope it sticks this time is going to be met head-on. We’ve got a lot to lose this time – more than the 4,000 dead in Iraq, more than a nation in distress and certainly enough to come back at people like you at every chance.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
My thoughts..Mrs.Obama should not be off limits nor Mrs. Mc Cain. They both interjected their own words. Mrs Obama..Re: was not proud of her country until she was an adult… and then Re: Mrs. McCain, said she was always very proud of her country. The Democrats even put the Bush’s children in the crossfires when it came to politics. The Obama supporters and his managers seem to be very disrespectful and seem to want their way on everything! Why do we say this? Because.. We cannot talk about these topics.. his race, (tho, he brings it up all the time) his parents, his background, his friends, his church, the people whom he knows from his past, his terrorists connections..his business connections, how much money he makes, his middle name and NOW his wife..don’t talk about her. His message is not positive and cannot bring the people together. I will never vote for him!
Posted by: Christie | May 19, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
obama is only there because he has blacks supporting him without thinking. he may be a role model for blacks given the history. i do not think, however, that he is a role model for non-blacks.
obama’s church says it all. he has had a 20+ yr relationship with a pastor who is a weirdo at the least. all obama says to that is that the pastor was different 20 yrs ago. what about a year ago? you failed to see that he has changed that recently? the guy is an arrogant person ready to vilify anyone for his political future.
mccain is not perfect. but he is a man of principle. and among the 2, the only one who has experience to lead our country. it is a shame that obama even got this far. how can we let such an inexperienced person ask for the world’s toughest and the most difficult job?
he has fooled thousands with his slogan ‘CHANGE’. in my opinion, he is offering nothing but the option to change the color of skin that the president has. he is absolutely not qualified to be one.
Posted by: sb | May 19, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
DDS – provide a bigoted statement by Obama.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
This from the man who has torn apart America with his partisan crap. I do not believe ONE WORD from this man’s mouth. I actually draw devil horns, tail and pitchfork whenever I see a picture of him! Shut Up Karl !!!!
Posted by: trombonemom | May 19, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Gee, I should believe Carl Rove–he allowed ABC to “get” this information (leak, leak) out to the public. Obviously Rove and the Republicans want McCain to be up against Hillary. Gee, why would that be?? Oh I know, they think McCain can beat her easier than Obama!! Nothing Rove does is by accident.
Posted by: Sallie | May 19, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
some obama supporters just cannot phantom the idea that many of us hillary supporters who are life-long multi-generational democrats will not ever, under any circumstance, ever, vote for obama. and no this is not an effort to get the dnc to concede to hillary. i personally trust john mccain. and i owe absolutely nobody an explanation including the democratic party who i feel has gone way too far to the left and abandoned its core traditional centrist democrat base. so pleeeese stop with the childish racist accusations, that only strengthens my resolve not to support obama. and pleeese stop with the fear-mongering against mccain you sound like gwb. and pleeese the ‘you are really republicans in disguise’ rant does not work either. if you want to make your case at least be original.
Posted by: sonia trevino | May 19, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
On The Glory,
Anybody watched the GMA this morning, when Michelle talked about Hillary would think she is a nice lady.
But back a few months ago on one interview when the reporter asked her if she’d like to support Hillary if she is the nominee, Michelle answered :” I have to think about it.”
I guess now she has to embrace Hillary supporters to get their votes. She should act differently.
Posted by: catleya | May 19, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I come from a STRONG RUPUBLICAN family and We will NOT VOTE REPUBLICAN THIS YEAR…..We refuse to vote for a the Party that has taken OUR COUNTRY DOWN !
Posted by: bernie | May 19, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
It sounds like a weak methodology at best, and I can tell you for a dead unerring certainty that Connecticut isn’t even in play for McCain; Obama or Hillary will stomp him here till the cows come home. Recall how badly W lost there in 2004? Nothing’s changed for the better for the GOP since then…
Posted by: Rich | May 19, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
New Thought….stop the scare tactics..most of the mortgage crisis is due to speculators flipping or people that could not afford the house who did not read the fine print! This economy is not as bad as the press would like everyone to believe..Just like the press covering Obama’s ass! Yes, gas prices are high, however, that again is because of the speculators! Were any of you unable to buy the gas or the groceries…are you sleeping in the streets? It is an election year and the politicians will use anything to scare the people. Give it some thought!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Sonia, I’m with you 100%!
Posted by: Decided | May 19, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
ONTheGloryRoad:You want some bigoted statements by Obama. Here’s a few. He described his grandmother as a typical white woman. He said white people are bred a certain way. He stereotyped rural people with the guns and religion comment. He said white folks’ greed runs a world in need.
Posted by: dds | May 19, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
SB – you stated: “he has fooled thousands with his slogan ‘CHANGE’. in my opinion, he is offering nothing but the option to change the color of skin that the president has. he is absolutely not qualified to be one…….FIRST, the “new” GOP slogan is “Change You Deserve”….so I think jumping on the McCain ship because you hate “Change” may mean you’d rather drown that get in the lifeboat and SECOND….”offering norhing but the option to change the color of skin” belies the real trouble you have – in the ’50′s we politely said you have a problem.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
I would add Obama Will NOT win Michigan or Florida either! The voters that live in these states know the truth.
1. He sent a letter to the state taking his name off Michigan ballot.
2. When The state of Michigan tried to put him and company back on our ballot, they threatened to sue the state of Michigan if they did.
3. He and his henchmen were here in Michigan telling all to vote uncommitted for Obama, richardson, Biden and Edwards. uncommitted was 40% divided by 4 = 10% for Mr. Obama.(ummm thats campaigning)violation
4. Obama’s campaign refused a revote here in Michigan even though we had it funded.violation of the people
5. No campaigning in states was an agreement he violated in Florida (he ran tv ads there for 2 full weeks before primary)violation
6. He was here in Michigan campaigning last week(hello the primaries are not done yet) another violation I’d say.(oh yeah, he also wore a flag pin) after saying he didn’t want to and wouldn’t.
7. Mr. Obama still to date do not want to count our votes unless the are diveded 50/50 (NO WAY IS THAT RIGHT!)
violation of the people
8. Bad judgement (how long does it take you to understand your pastor/church spews hate) maybe 6 mo I’ll give you a year or 2 years if you dont attend regularly (and thats pushing it).
9. Ask yourself this question would you stay with a church thats doctrine you didn’t believe in?
10. More bad judgement(threw his white grandmother under the bus as a racist)
wow! What would you do if someone did this to your grandma?
11. More bad judgement: I can no sooner denounce my pastor than I can a family member.
UNTRUSTWORTHY=He then denounces his pastor. Damn I’m missing something here maybe I should sip some of your kool-aid.
12. Even more bad Judgement:I will meet with terrorist & rogue countries WITHOUT PRECONDITIONS (now thats a doozy)
13. Letting his wife say “Someone needs to give up their share of the pie in order for others to have a piece” (hello this is america bake more pie)
14. Another quote from Michelle “Barack will not let you stay in your home and ignore him~he will make all come out of their comfort zone and participate with him” (Again this is America if I want to stay in my home and have NO PART of the OBAMA’S~I DONT HAVE TO~THAT IS MY RIGHT)
15. Another quote from michelle “We are having a hard time paying for our daughters piano lessons” puuleeezzzzz!!!! at a net income of $500,000.00 a year.
What the hell do you think the hard working “LUNCHBUCKET DEMOCRATS” are having a hard time paying for stuff like GAS, MILK ETC…(FYI “LUNCHBUCKET DEMOCRATS” is also Reagon democrats no matter what color, ethnicity, gender the original term came about from people taking a homemade lunch in a lunchpail (or brownbagging it) to work because they could not afford to buy lunch daily)
READ REAL CAREFUL NOW OK~~PUT DOWN THE KOOL-AID, SLOWLY NOW CAREFUL PUT DOWN THE KOOL-AID DONT WANT IT FLIP-FLOPPING AROUND DO YOU~WOULDN’T WANT IT TO SPILL OVER AND MAKE A HUGE STICKY MESS NOW!!!!!!!
Wake-up smell the coffee or roses if you prefer he is UNELECTABLE and will lose.
Posted by: Kim from MI~ | May 19, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Obama is racist!
Posted by: Thumb | May 19, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Christie got it right.
Posted by: voter in florida | May 19, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Patty daggs
You are way out of touch. You obviously aren’t one of those people
who lost their home
who don’t have healthcare
who can’t find a job
who is piling on the credit card debt
who has family who are in Iraq
who has a family member who was injured in Iraq
has ever traveled in the past 4 years and heard our reputation in the world
or someone who cares about a conservative supreme court.
or the effects of a McCain won election on the congress faith that the country needs a different direction
It’s not scare tactics when you/we are living in it.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
I think that in general, once McCain has to move towards the tarnished GOP brand, polls will trend away from him, and that as the Democratic Party comes together behind its flag bearer, Obama’s ratings will go up. Clinton is more of a known quantity and if she did get the nomination, I don’t think she would get the same boost Obama will. I guess in short what I am saying is take this data with a pinch of salt.
Posted by: markymark | May 19, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
I think if a candidates wife makes a public statement it should not be off limits. To be fair, the Obama campaign should play Cindy McCain saying she’s proud of her country and ask radio stations to play unpatriotic music in the background.
Posted by: Leo | May 19, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Hey, this is a no brainer particularly with Hillary Democrats voting for John. The annointed one has dissed Small-Town America, rural America, white working class, and will not gain white women votes. He has won caucus States because Hillary did not challenge him with time and money in those States. Hillary won States where the people voted such as California, New York, PA, Ohio, Texas and so on. So, it looks so, so bleak for this one in November.
Posted by: benvictor | May 19, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Are you still going to beleive this guy?
Posted by: junior123 | May 19, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Posted by ryan: “didnt obama take his own name off the ballot in MI? wouldnt that be considered his own fault? how did Hillary happen to be on there and Obama not?”
Senator Obama removed his name from the MI ballot for strategic purposes. Senator Clinton was favored to win in MI. Senator Obama did not want a loss in the bigger state of MI to diminish his wins in the smaller states.
Posted by: LindaJ | May 19, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Why in the world should anyone not already brain washed by the anti-intellectual, anti-choice, anti-gay, pro-gun, laissez-faire right care what Karl Rove has to say? He’s the master mind that got Bush and Cheney elected to two terms for heaven’s sake, so he’s anything but a disinterested political analyst. Of course his map shows Hillary a tougher opponent for McCaine; the Republican Party is sacred to death of Obama’s ‘yes-we-can’ movement. Take away the Republicans who voted for Hillary in primary elections and now say they won’t vote for Obama in the general election, and Obama would have had the nomination locked back in March.
Posted by: Kent | May 19, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
It’s funny how Hillary Clinton can say something as simple as President Johnson was helpful to MLK in helping achieve civil rights legislation and she is branded as racist, yet Obama supporters are unable to see prejudice in his crude and bigoted remarks.
Posted by: dds | May 19, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Karl Rove is a sleaze.. Guaranteed this report was not meant to be accurate, and it has some ulterior motive behind it.
Posted by: Sharonkathleen | May 19, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
i don’t respect hillary completely. I give it to her for respecting the flag. i would never vote for her..well, if it was between her and the jr senator…then I would give it to her..I have a 3rd choice, so it’s mccain all the way! most people see that obama is a racist! look at his true colors today. the people who follow him are sick and or dreaming that he’s the chosen one. this is getting way out of hand, people!
Posted by: voter in florida | May 19, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
DDS: I am going to repost your response so this nation sees what a mess we are in:…..From DDS: “You want some bigoted statements by Obama. Here’s a few. He described his grandmother as a typical white woman. He said white people are bred a certain way. He stereotyped rural people with the guns and religion comment. He said white folks’ greed runs a world in need.” NOW – get some education: A)Grandmother…. “The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity, but that she is a typical white person. If she sees somebody on the street that she doesn’t know – there’s a reaction in her that’s been bred into our experiences that don’t go away and sometimes come out in the wrong way and that’s just the nature of race in our society. We have to break through it. What makes me optimistic is you see each generation feeling less like that. And that’s pretty powerful stuff” B) White people bred a certain way: just reread It’s interesting, right? C) Guns and religion: “It’s interesting, right? Lately there’s been a typical sort of political fight. Because I said something that everybody knows is true — which is that there are a whole bunch of folks in small towns in Pennsylvania, in towns right here in Indiana, in my hometown in Illinois, who are bitter. They are angry. They feel like they’ve been left behind. They feel like folks aren’t paying attention to what they’re doing here. So I said, ‘Well, you know, when you’re bitter you turn to what you can count on.’ So people, they vote about guns. Or they take comfort from their faith, and their family and their community. And they get mad about illegal immigrants who are coming into this country. Or they get frustrated about, you know, how things have changed. That’s a natural response. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” D) Greed / need: Pbama in New York “on Thursday blamed lobbyists, greedy businessmen and complacent Washington politicians for creating “an ethic of greed” that led to today’s foreclosure crisis…..NOW let us read the whole cloth, not the frayed fabric you try to sell as boltage.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Sharonkathleen,
I agree with you 100%
Posted by: trombonemom | May 19, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
and just so any “normal Americans are reading this…
most Hillary supporters are planning to vote for Obama…
becasue most hillary supporters are thoughtful, intelligent democrats who care deeply for this country…
those on here that say”we’re going to vote for Mccain” are the whack jobs who have thrown their entire anger and meaning behind her without thought for the country and the values and policies she is actually saying out of her mouth which are entirely different than McCain’s.
Pro-life/pro-choice
continue the war/end the war
predominant tax savings to the rich/predominant tax savings to middle and lower class
do something about healthcare/let the market handle it
do something about the housing foreclosure crisis/don’t do anything
appoint conservative judges/appoint more liberal judges
fight for lower income/fight for free market above all
strengthen afghanistan military/ continue focus on iraq
regain our standing in the world / keep our foreign policy and standing in the world
Americans and Hillary supporters (besides most of the ones on here) want to get us back on track… that means they don’t vote for McCain who has promised almost exactly the same policies as Bush.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
As an Obama supporter I would have to say I am not confident that he will be able to beat McCain.
My reasons for feeling this way have nothing to do with Karl Rove’s ridiculous maps and models but more so with my “fellow Americans”. Unfortunately, we still have individuals in this country who are still so ignorant and racist that they willing to display a level of stupidity I never could have imagined possible in November.
If you are consider yourself a democrat and you are willing to vote for someone who doesn’t share any of your views on the issues versus someone who may share some of your views on the issues than that tells me that,as a voter, your ultimate goal in November is for the President not to be a black man.
As you may have guessed, I too am a black man. I am also a veteran of both OIF and OEF and it shames me to see a significant portion of my “fellow Americans” are still racist.
Many of you reference Obama’s lack of experience and his former pastor as your reasons for threatning to vote outside of your party but you are not fooling anyone with that nonsense.
Even if Reverend had not made those remarks you would still be the same racist you are now.
Lastly, I would like to remind everyone that (1)This is not a european country it is country a with a very diverse populace the face of of our leadership should reflect this. (2) This is not a monarchy. If you think that family ties automatically qualifies someone to sit in the oval office you have obviously been in a coma the last 8 years. We need a to move in a new direction in this country and the only we to do that is to actually put new blood in white house. It’s very annoying to hear the masses complain and say the want change but don’t vote that way. I mean what’s next Chelsea Clinton for President or maybe one of Bush girls. Come on America
This is in no way directed at everyone who doesn’t support Obama because there are people out there who truly just do not believe he is the right guy for the job and I can respect that. My comment will only offend those mentioned above and they know who they are. To all those who people who see Obama as a presidential candidate and not a black man I am grateful.
Posted by: lac | May 19, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
It’s interesting to watch these hypnotized Obamabots rationalize everything. If you blog against his bigotry, you must really be a Republican. If you don’t vote for him, you must be racist. If you try to hold Obama responsible for his bigoted statements, you must be taking it out of context. I wonder if reality will set in when he loses in November. I doubt it.
Posted by: dds | May 19, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
I am NOT voting for OBama. I am black. I am a mother. I do not and never have hated my country! Not all blacks will be voting for that man!
Posted by: Martha | May 19, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
I can’t help but wonder what’s going through the minds of the “Obama is unelectable” types when they see 80,000 people come out for a rally in Portland, OR (often teasingly referred to by its own citizens as “America’s Whitest City”…
…I dunno…I’ve seen a bunch of elections and actually drove an hour to join a massive crowd that gathered to see Bill Clinton in his first campaign…I think Obama’s got that “thing” that Bill had…you can slice and dice and parse and analyze…but how can deny what happened yesterday in Oregon?
Posted by: greenpointguy | May 19, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
OBAMA CA NOT WIN! The only states he wins are republican stats and they will go republican in the fall if he is nominee. Hillary carries all of the big staes and she can carry them in the general election Obama will not. Hillary has the support of the poeple. Obama cheats in EVERY primary and every caucus. Look at what the MAyor did in GAry Indiana. He trid to hold all of the Hillary votes until another mayor pressued him and then he released them. If no one would have said anyhting he would never have released Hillary’s votes. OBAMA IS A CHEATER! If the DNC pushes Obama I will vote Republican.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
DONT DISRESPECT ME BY NOT COUNTING MY VOTE!
I would add Obama Will NOT win Michigan or Florida either! The voters that live in these states know the truth.
1. He sent a letter to the state taking his name off Michigan ballot.
2. When The state of Michigan tried to put him and company back on our ballot, they threatened to sue the state of Michigan if they did.
3. He and his henchmen were here in Michigan telling all to vote uncommitted for Obama, richardson, Biden and Edwards. uncommitted was 40% divided by 4 = 10% for Mr. Obama.(ummm thats campaigning)violation
4. Obama’s campaign refused a revote here in Michigan even though we had it funded.violation of the people
5. No campaigning in states was an agreement he violated in Florida (he ran tv ads there for 2 full weeks before primary)violation
6. He was here in Michigan campaigning last week(hello the primaries are not done yet) another violation I’d say.(oh yeah, he also wore a flag pin) after saying he didn’t want to and wouldn’t.
7. Mr. Obama still to date do not want to count our votes unless the are diveded 50/50 (NO WAY IS THAT RIGHT!)
violation of the people
8. Bad judgement (how long does it take you to understand your pastor/church spews hate) maybe 6 mo I’ll give you a year or 2 years if you dont attend regularly (and thats pushing it).
9. Ask yourself this question would you stay with a church thats doctrine you didn’t believe in?
10. More bad judgement(threw his white grandmother under the bus as a racist)
wow! What would you do if someone did this to your grandma?
11. More bad judgement: I can no sooner denounce my pastor than I can a family member.
UNTRUSTWORTHY=He then denounces his pastor. Damn I’m missing something here maybe I should sip some of your kool-aid.
12. Even more bad Judgement:I will meet with terrorist & rogue countries WITHOUT PRECONDITIONS (now thats a doozy)
13. Letting his wife say “Someone needs to give up their share of the pie in order for others to have a piece” (hello this is america bake more pie)
14. Another quote from Michelle “Barack will not let you stay in your home and ignore him~he will make all come out of their comfort zone and participate with him” (Again this is America if I want to stay in my home and have NO PART of the OBAMA’S~I DONT HAVE TO~THAT IS MY RIGHT)
15. Another quote from michelle “We are having a hard time paying for our daughters piano lessons” puuleeezzzzz!!!! at a net income of $500,000.00 a year.
What the hell do you think the hard working “LUNCHBUCKET DEMOCRATS” are having a hard time paying for stuff like GAS, MILK ETC…(FYI “LUNCHBUCKET DEMOCRATS” is also Reagon democrats no matter what color, ethnicity, gender the original term came about from people taking a homemade lunch in a lunchpail (or brownbagging it) to work because they could not afford to buy lunch daily)
READ REAL CAREFUL NOW OK~~PUT DOWN THE KOOL-AID, SLOWLY NOW CAREFUL PUT DOWN THE KOOL-AID DONT WANT IT FLIP-FLOPPING AROUND DO YOU~WOULDN’T WANT IT TO SPILL OVER AND MAKE A HUGE STICKY MESS NOW!!!!!!!
Wake-up smell the coffee or roses if you prefer he is UNELECTABLE and will lose.
Posted by: Kim from Michigan~ | May 19, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
formerhillary not that i owe you an explanation but; i am a college student and unlike obama’s mother who received foodstamps as a college student. i work part-time and attend school fulltime. my oldest son has a part-time job as well. we grow allot of our own food, we recycle, and ride our bikes-or public transit. i find the challenges we face more helpful to my children’s development versus bitching about ‘our country’ price of gas etc, expecting handouts, or awaiting for the messiah to deliver us from economic hardship.
Posted by: sonia trevino | May 19, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
OBAMA CA NOT WIN! The only states he wins are republican stats and they will go republican in the fall if he is nominee. Hillary carries all of the big staes and she can carry them in the general election Obama will not. Hillary has the support of the poeple. Obama cheats in EVERY primary and every caucus. Look at what the MAyor did in GAry Indiana. He trid to hold all of the Hillary votes until another mayor pressued him and then he released them. If no one would have said anyhting he would never have released Hillary’s votes. OBAMA IS A CHEATER! If the DNC pushes Obama I will vote Republican.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
IN TERMS OF WHAT CARL ROVE STANDS FOR, his views are like selling snake oil to Democrats. Democrats don’t need him–not his strategy, not his advice. He represents the worst of what Democrats and Obama in particular are fighting against–the old gutter politics of division and unadulterated darkside. Only the big media conglomorates and Rove’s Republican bedfellows still care about such venomous views. Do you think that the young people who are supporting Obama care about Rove and his approach to politics? I suspect the country is turning the corner on the Rove era–as seen in recent Republican losses. Republicans lost even though Rove’s strategy featured prominently in their ads. Rove himself intervened but made only a negative difference. America has come to know better!
Posted by: Dr. Sam | May 19, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Thumb, this typical white woman agrees with you, Obama is a racist who has been going to a racist church for 20 years. Obama cannot garner enough votes across the racial divide to win because he has dissed the middle class, people with less education, the elderly, the hispanics and asians and who knows who else. I think he’s just down to the AA’s who don’t realize they are being manipulated by him and the latte liberals who think he’s going to cure all our racial ills. However, this guy has stirred up the racial divide like no candidate ever because of his really scary associates and tactless remarks.
Posted by: JKR | May 19, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
One thing it says–that America’s whites do not hate blacks as the media pushes down our throats. A lot of people seem to think he can bring the races together or make the wrongs from the past seem better. He cannot be elected (the educated voter will step up) and stop it..also, because he’s in over his head. It’s beyond me why the dems in that party have allowed these nuts to take over this great ole party!
Posted by: a voter in florida | May 19, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Don’t know why this is news. Sane people who have followed presidential elections for a while know this. Moveon.org type extremist liberals want to push Obama down the throat of unwilling democrats. Obama is a loser, unless you drink the Kool-aid of course.
Posted by: Long-term Democrat | May 19, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Obama’s campaign takes money from dead people. He also has received votes from dead poeple. Is this the change America wants? if so this is one stupid country.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Oh yeah. I’m gonna trust Karl Rove. That’s the #1 dirty tricks guy of the last election. If he says it’s daytime, I’ll look out the window to see what the truth is.
Posted by: soupy | May 19, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
From the man/the party that called in lawyers to make the votes in Florida be counted..again and again..now, he doesn’t want to count 2 states. what a joke LOLOLOLOL!
Posted by: ron | May 19, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
If Obama gets the most delegates, he is the nominee. I am a republican. You democrats will be foolish to take any advice from Karl Rove. Do you really think that Karl Rove wants whats best for you democrats?
Posted by: win | May 19, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
“Senator Obama removed his name from the MI ballot for strategic purposes. Senator Clinton was favored to win in MI. Senator Obama did not want a loss in the bigger state of MI to diminish his wins in the smaller states.”
That… is the funniest thing I’ve read in a week.
Why didn’t he do it in Florida? What strategic purposes would giving up any delegates he would win in MI?
Clinton herself said that Michigan wasn’t going “to count” going into the primary. Of course, since she is behind, now she wants MI and FL counted, saying everyone’s voices should be heard.
Clinton campaign officials expected to wrap up the nomination on Feb. 5, and had no strategy past that point. Look what’s happened since then, look at all the people that would not have had their voices matter–at least not to the Clintons if things would have unfolded the way they wanted.
All the people should be heard from, this is why I love individual primaries vs. a national one. However, when the political, pandering motivation is *this* evident, these cries ring hollow.
Posted by: G | May 19, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Rove? Why can’t this cretin stay under his rock?
Posted by: ac | May 19, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Yes and in 2006 Rove said that by “his math” which was “THE MATH” the republicans would keep the house and senate. Besides next week he will be in contempt of congress.
Posted by: Sanity Man | May 19, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Mel
if you look at the real numbers which no one is doing…you will seethat the dem turn out crushed the republican turn out this year…
that primary numbers within a party mean nothing unless they are gigantic margins…and even then it is questionable
and most importantly the head to head match ups between Obama and McCain inherently have included the numbers from the height of the primary which would include the highest reported defections because of spite from the dem party…which as muchas some hillary supporters wish won’t even be close.,,when it comes to vote in the general between these two candidates plans and policies.
This is most likely going to be a blow out compared to the last few decades of elections.
Look at the primaries Obamas numbers alone were double that in many cases of McCain.
The country wants change and McCain is only going to change the environmental practices of the country.
He says get rid of pork but he has campaign made up of all the pig farmers (lobbyists).
Obama will be the next president short of the world blowing up.
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Obama’s campaign takes money from dead people. He also has received votes from dead poeple. Is this the change America wants? if so this is one stupid country.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008 5:07:04 PM
MEL, WHERE IN THE WORLD DO YOU COME UP IWITH THIS STUFF
Posted by: roger in VA | May 19, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Karl Rove is a FAT liar.
There have been polls taken that have said and quoted,
the GOP wanted Hillary to be the GOP opponent because
she would be easier to beat than Obama by McCain.
Obama will kick McCains but during the presidential
debates once he’s there. McCain is nothing more than
a re-badge bumbling Bush in different clothing,
who stutters, uses words like “Googler and Internets”, and
can’t articulate himself and is short tempered.
Therefore Karl Rove and his goons want, people Democrats to believe Hillary is
harder to beat and vote for her, instead of Obama and take the
real harder opponent out of the picture before the Presidential elections
in Nov. 08.
Posted by: Stanley Hutchinson | May 19, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Yes, USVet, I fully agree with you.
Posted by: Nikki | May 19, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
The respected site electoral-vote has consistently shown similar results: Hillary does better in electoral votes than does Obama against McCain in the general election matchups, based on polling data.
Posted by: Charles | May 19, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Somehow I doubt this report is true. It’s just the typical Rove dirty trick.
Posted by: cat | May 19, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
In 2006 Rove said his math was “THE MATH” and that republicans would hold the house and senate. So much for his credibility and this discussion.
Posted by: Sanity Man | May 19, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
So we are going to give all our Millitary in the hands of a guy whose only experience is community service in the southside of Chicago. If Hill is not on the ticket Barak looses.Mccain has a son fighting in Iraq.Go with Jeb Bush{Mexican wife,Catholic,Florida},with a message “GO Cheney yourself” to DEMS. I Will vote for Mccain.
Posted by: ashwin patel | May 19, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Wow, the concern trolling here is funny! I’m so sure Rove is so concerned about the Democratic party that he’s trying to “help” them. Uh huh.
Posted by: USVet | May 19, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Let’s be reasonable. Dem or Rep, I am Dem, but still love GHWB (41) and his fiscal conservatism. The Reps have lost thier way. As best put by Robert Novak-”Today’s Republican Party — divided, drifting, demoralized”. Mr. Rove is not a good source for objective info. He, Hannity, and Newt Gingrich should tuck tails and fix thier party instead of offering “helpful hints” Nimrods!
Posted by: disabledOIFvet | May 19, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
This proves to me that Rove wants to run against Clinton. Why else would he push this point of view?
Obama/Byrd
Posted by: billy smith | May 19, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
HEY, has anyone heard about The republicans having a video showing Michelle Obama preaching hate along with REv. Wright. The republicans have it and they are going to release it as an October surprise. That is why Obama is laying the ground work by telling people to leave Michelle alone. He knows about the tape
and he IS SCARED! I want them to show it so Hillary will get the nomination and Obama will lose NOW!
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Breaking news!
barrack Obama had met with a Hezbullah leader in MI!
Obama Met Secretly With Shady Imam in Michigan This Week
Barack Obama met secretly with a controversial Imam this week in Michigan.
Imam Hassan Qazwini has hosted Louis Farrakhan at his mosque and is close to the Hezbollah Spiritual Leader who issued the fatwa to blow up 300 U.S. Marines and embassy officials in 1983!
Posted by: Tom, CA | May 19, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Kim From Michigan: Your rant and posting about Obama and the Michigan revote is without merit and YOU from Michigan should know it. Present the whole cloth – not the dyed yardage you want to peddle at a garage sale: From the AP Thursday March 6 2008, last updated at 21:14 on March 06 2008: “Hillary Clinton today rejected the growing but controversial call for a re-running of primary elections in Florida and Michigan. At a Washington press conference at which she was surrounded by generals and admirals who endorsed her, Clinton reiterated her insistence that delegates from the two states be seated at the August convention in accordance with the January contests, which she won. “It would be a great disservice to the voters of Florida and Michigan to adopt any process that would disenfranchise anyone,” she said at a press conference in Washington. “Therefore I am still committed to seating their delegations.” ‘ Therefore: as you well know the DNC rules for credentials well stated prior to those two states moving up their primary dates was that the delegates would not count. It is up to the DNC to now figure out the mess which the GOVERNORS OF MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA are responsible. Don’t lay this at Obama’s feet.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Obama is the real , Bush third term!
terminal! McCain is the real change!
Posted by: Tom, CA | May 19, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Rove and the Reps, have wanted clinton as the nominee since the beginning, so this is no surprise to those who pay attention to what is going on. Kinda like the ‘Rush’ effect….drops in a buckets nothing more.
Who would trust anything he says anyway?
Posted by: jc | May 19, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
ROGER, if you would stop watching main stream media which ADMITS thAT they are Obama bias, and start looking for the truth. You will see that Obama’s records show that he has campaign contributions from DEAD people. THis is a fact. Media tries to cover it up. You can keep your head in the sand or you can look at the facts. If you are a close Minded person that does not want the truth then I do not want to correspond with you. If you want facts I can give them. In the mean time- STAY AWAY FROM THE OBAMA KOOL-_AID!
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Carl Rove would of course push this. McCain and Clinton couldn’t attract 75 thousand people if they combined their rallies and multiplied it by 10. The GOP don’t know how to fight against Obama. He makes people want to believe again. Even jaded 50 year old women like me. The GOP would rather go against a candidate who comes with a 51 percent negative rating.
Posted by: wlw100 | May 19, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
if you look at the real numbers which no one is doing…you will seethat the dem turn out crushed the republican turn out this year…
Posted by: dl | May 19, 2008 5:12:34 PM
========================================
You are a very wiseman, And to add even in states where Barack finsh second to Hillary , he carry at times 2 to 3 times more voters than McCian.
So Come November.. Barack VOTERS plus 2/3 of Hillary will be more than enough to destroy McCain.
Poor McCain cant even motivate REAL Republicans , They are not on board with neo_con politics. And McCain not shy; He wants to carry on George Bush policies.
Amd whatever independent voters Mccain had the minute he went into bed with george Bush . Those were footsteps you heard of them LEAVING HIM.
On a election nite it will be a whippin.
Young voters have not been this motivated in their life . and they will propel the double digit victory.
.
Posted by: sam | May 19, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Looking at the chart the gap has certainly narrowed since May 8th and will disappear after Tuesday. Karl Rove can hardly tell the Democrats who to vote for – I do believe it would be best to make an analysis on why the Republicans have lost all three “safe” seats in the House as of late – that would earn him his dinner at the troth.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Hillary’s strength and determination are sure signs of a great leader. VOTE SMART.VOTE HILLARY!
Posted by: andrea | May 19, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Women in this country should be fed up with all of the sexism against Hillary! Threats that have been made against her would never be made against a man. SEXISM is alive in America. Yet, if you do not like Obama you are racist! I depise Obama and I don’t care what color he is. Leave RACE out of this is it is only an EXCUSE!
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
It’s up to the Democrats to pick a nominee that will best lead the country, not win for the sake of winning. With such overwhelming numbers turning out in the Dem primaries, the Dems have the luxury of picking the best candidate not just someone that will appeal to the remnant of dopey republicans that want something different but are not willing to vote for a true Democratic candidate.
Posted by: Maddy | May 19, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Seriously, is there a single person here who has a Y chromosome who really believes that Hillary is being honest about the Michigan and Florida thing.
These facts are uncontested. Hillary openly agreed that if the states moved up their primaries, their delegates would not be seated. Obama was not on the ballot in Michigan. Neither campaigned in either state. Voters in those states had every reason to believe that their votes would not yield delegates.
Objectively, it seems to me, and I mean this with no disrespect that the only way to respect Hillary’s argument regarding these delegates is to either be foolish or dishonest. Thats really not an opinion, its data, its beyond a reasonable doubt…
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Hillary in DENIAL is a sure sign of a horrible leader.
It’s over. I wouldn’t be surprised if Al Gore endorsed Obama Wednesday.
By the way, Obama picked up 5 SDs today… so far
Posted by: Vanessa | May 19, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Tom CA and the rest of the Muckrakers: Tell the whole truth – quit the attempted mud rucking Karl Rovian style of politics. Did you notice the last sentence in the article? “And none of them though to click the link and read, “Qazwini has also met several times with President Bush and other elected officials.” For your education: “Barack Obama campaigned in Michigan this week, and during his trip, he met privately with a prominent Muslim leader. It wasn’t especially noteworthy; candidates meet with prominent religious leaders frequently, from a variety of faiths, in communities nationwide. Imam Hassan Qazwini, head of the Islamic Center of America, said in an email that he met with Obama at Macomb Community College. A mosque spokesman, Eide Alawan, confirmed that the meeting took place. During the meeting, the two discussed the Presidential election, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the Iraq war, according to Qazwini. At the end of the meeting, Qazwini said he gave Obama a copy of new book, “American Crescent,” and invited Obama to visit his center. […] Born in Iraq into a long line of Shi’ite clerics, Qazwini and his family left for Iran to escape persecution under the regime of Saddam Hussein. He later moved to the U.S. and become head of the Dearborn mosque, one of the largest Shi’ite Muslim centers in the U.S. No one cared. No one, that is, until Debbie Schlussel, one of the more unhinged members of the conservative blogosphere, argued the day after the Obama meeting, “Barack Obama claims he’s against HAMAS and Hezbollah and is offended by President Bush’s speech in Israel about Obama’s ethos of ‘appeasement.’ So why is he meeting with one of Hezbollah’s most important imams and agents in America, Imam Hassan Qazwini? … What was said? I think we can do the math.” Schlussel went on to accuse Qazwini, without proof, of being “an agent of the Iranian government,” and a supporter of “Palestinian homicide bombings, HAMAS, and Hezbollah.” She added that the Wednesday meeting “says a lot about the company Obama keeps … and why he shouldn’t be President.” Schlussel also quoted the Detroit Times Free Press article noting the Obama meeting, but omitted the one sentence that undermined her vacuous smear. The article concluded, “Qazwini has also met several times with President Bush and other elected officials.” Yep, this allegedly radical, terrorist-supporting agent of Iran is so dangerous, he’s been able to hang out with George W. Bush. Schlussel’s attack was widely parroted by the far-right, with the usual suspects charactering the Obama meeting as something scandalous. One argued, “BHO isn’t even officially the Democratic nominee yet and already he’s meeting terrorist supporters — and Iran by proxy.” And none of them though to click the link and read, “Qazwini has also met several times with President Bush and other elected officials.”……now go craw back under your rocks.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
The republicans really know how to play mind games with democrats. don’t you get what the republicans are doing. divide and conquer. regardless of what Karl Rove says Hillary is getting her butt kicked by Obama now!!
Posted by: jp | May 19, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Ben, I know and the republicans are saving it for October. You can thank the DNC for another republican president if they let Obama steal the nomination!
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I’d more believe the opposite of what Rove is saying. I suspect he’s still on the payroll.
Posted by: Richard | May 19, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
noone can pick on michelle. tough. she leads rallies; she bad mouths the usa; she is a legitimate political issue; do we want her as first lady.
obama better toughen up; the games have just begun
Posted by: ron | May 19, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Obama please do not take the witch as your VP!
Do not pay her debt!
We did not donate you to pay her off!
Hillary go to hell!
Obama 2008!
Posted by: Janette | May 19, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“Obama will be the next president short of the world blowing up.”
Agreed. The world blowing up won’t come until after Obama is elected.
Posted by: vancav | May 19, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
does anybody else notice the trend Rove has set here?…. a couple months ago he said Obama was the toughest… then he said Hillary was the toughest to beat…. then he offered advice to Obama on how to beat Hillary (this was during his streak of primary wins mind you) Now he says Hillary can beat McCain…
Confusion Tactics anyone?
For Dems. its as simple as: 1. Obama/Clinton ’08 2. General Election Win 3. Clinton/Sebelius ’16
Posted by: marley | May 19, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
mel – seems you really were hoping for a woman president. You despise Obama? Yes, and I’m sure if Hillary were running against McCain – he would have just graciously backed out of the campaign cause he knows how much it means to you to elect a woman… He wouldn’t have been so rude as to run a brilliant and surprisingly decent campaign.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
mel – seems you really were hoping for a woman president. You despise Obama? Yes, and I’m sure if Hillary were running against McCain – he would have just graciously backed out of the campaign cause he knows how much it means to you to elect a woman… He wouldn’t have been so rude as to run a brilliant and surprisingly decent campaign.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Rove did such a great job with the GOP and the 2006 elections. Why very astute, a lot of his underlying assumptions are based on traditional voter turn-outs and affiliations.
Posted by: scott jeffries | May 19, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
JR,
Of course the Republicans are playing mind games that is why they put Obama up there in the first place. EVERYONE knew that Hillary was going to be preident and they had to stop her. SO they created this “ROCK star” with an occult following for all the limings out there. He is backed by republicans to steal it away from Hillary so he can lose in November. Wait and see. if he wins the nomination that is exactly what will happen. Can’t help if you can’t see the truth.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Hopefully, the congress will take its time in their investigation and certain prosecution and conviction of Karl Rove. We don’t want him found guilty during this administration. The beauty is that Bush can’t pardon him before he is found guilty.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Hillary is the one!
Posted by: chris997 | May 19, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
“Hillary is the one”?
What does that mean? Can she manipulate the matrix? Can she bend the spoon?
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Hillary is definitely better against McCain than Obama. Hillary can at least make the argument that she is centrist (where the bulk of the undecideds reside). There is no way that Obama could make this claim. He is hardcore socialist and there is no denying it. He also has stayed in a radical rasist church for 20 years. How do you recover from that. As a Moderate Democrat, I think we have just handed another election to the righties.
Posted by: rocky | May 19, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Obama thinks we have 57 states, because he got us confused with the 57 muslin states! SCARY!
Vote Smart Vote-Hillary!
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Michelle, sweetie, stop belittling the country and we will stop “picking” on you. Oh by the way, I do not buy for one second that you have respect for Hillary. You Michelle Obelle Obama are one evil lady!
Posted by: Goaway | May 19, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
I’ve made several posts here (perhaps too many for some) but indulge me a moment before I head off to work for the night. Karl Rove was the architect of divisional negative politics – he taught classes in Negative Campaigning and he’s still at it. To all my fellow citizens and Democrats (if applicable). Our nation has big problems from global insecurity to domestic chaos. We have a choice to make in November – a Democrat or a Republican to set the course for 2009 through 2012. Senator Clinton and Senator McCain were well known before 2007 – many asked Obama, who? as he entered the race. Amazing that in just over a year his name brings “gut” reaction from both sides. Right now and unless something really convinces me otherwise I’ll take a chance on the young fella from Illinois. I don’t think I’m wrong – I voted twice against Bush and I didn’t waste my vote, I sleep well at night with my conscience. Bless our country and “tell the truth”, don’t spin it, don’t parcel it, quote the whole article. Put Karl Rove and the politics of yore out to pasture. Bless everyone and vote (whomever you finally decide upon and believe will steer us safely ahead).
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | May 19, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Whats all this vote Hillary stuff? I know Clinton’s already out. Is Hillary Duff announcing her candidacy as an independent, I don’t get it, Hillary who?
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Who in would take the advice of the enemy? Rove should be working on what to do after Bush pardons him for all his crimes against this Country.
Posted by: Vernon | May 19, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Obama won’t even answer a question unless his staff screens them first. He also refuses to debate Hillary because he does not have enough knowledge and he looks stupid against her. Hillary always answers questions from people without a prescreening. Becuase she is tough, articulate, and intelligent. You obama supports need to get your head out of the sand and be afraid of this man.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE
Posted by: Steph | May 19, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Jim: I trust Rove also even though I am a democrat for Hillary. Rove is a very intelligent man and well educated. He could throw rings around Obama who is suppose to be educated but cannot win a debate, hesitates before answering the questions and sometimes stutters. I can’t imagine him as president or his run of the mouth wife Michelle.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | May 19, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
this is just the way they play. they play with a stacked deck. they want democrats to vote for the person they can win against.
this is karl rove peeps. verrrrry dangerous “brain”.
and now he has a soapbox and a microphone.
take another look and ask why the republicans would ever promote a loss.
Posted by: tom | May 19, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
I don’t think the turnout in Portland is a positive for Obama. Portland is known coutrywide as a concentration of left wing loons. A large turnout there just reinforces Obama’s reputation as a far left wack job. For example, if Obama went to Harlem and 100K people showed up, would that make peopole in America more likely to vote for him. No. Than why would 70K lefties with dreadlocks and tie-dies do it. Also, his comments about SUV’s and home temperatures make him look like an environmental kook.
Posted by: Slarn | May 19, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Mr. Rove, we are not looking for tough.
Look at tough guy “BUSH” where he got us. We are looking for a leader who is smart, with sound judgements, knowledgeable, and knows how and when to utilizes the resources around him. Sen. Obama has the leadership that attracts those “RESOURCES” – Look at the people who is supporting him, compared to the SSME’O! SAME’O in the Clinton Camp. Democrats we will unite and we will take it all the way to the White-House. DID YOU SEE SEN. OBAMA HUGGING MY PEOPLE IN MONTANA, TODAY – I HAVE NEVER FELT THAT I WAS PART OF SOMETHING, UNTIL BARACK OBAMA – HE TRULY EMBRACES ALL AMERICANS – INCLUDING NATIVE AMERICANS. GO OBAMA! GO DEMOCRATS! GO USA! Sincerely, Lake Hart, a Native American Writer.
Posted by: Lake Hart - A Native American Writer | May 19, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
ON THE GLORY ROAD, if you would read others post instead of just writing your own you would see a million reason why you should not vote fro Obama!
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
ENTITLEMENT!!!!!!
Posted by: Lake Hart - A Native American Writer | May 19, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Mel – you really must be personally invested because you spit out every inane argument with conviction.
Its OK though, President Obama won’t hold it against you. Get used to the idea and by the way, Hillary won’t win next time or the time after that or the time after that. That victory speech that she wrote as first lady will never be delivered.
Posted by: stevez515 | May 19, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
McCain is as unelectable. We’ve seen just how great the Republicans were for the country headed by their fearless leader who is actually willing to give up golf as his “sacrifice” to the troops. Oh, man. 4 more years of this crap and we’ll be finished. OBAMA ALL THE WAY!
Posted by: Robert | May 19, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
countallthevotes – your numbers are incorrect. Where did the numbers come from?
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | May 19, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
As cindy in NC Writes:
The New Math:
Obama – Hillary supporters = Pres.McCain
I’ll add my own:
Hillary – Obama supporters = Pres. McCain
We’re all in the same boat, people.
Posted by: Patrick | May 19, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Obama is nothing more than a creation by the media and the republicans. He nothing nothing about the world, policies, diplomacy, geography, nothing. he is freinds with terrorist he is as crooked as he can be. Aren’t you afrain of a mna who can not answer questins unless they are presreened by his staff. And when he talk on his own he he looks like and idiot. He couldn’t even answer a question in Oregan so he called th ereport “sweetie” to divert attention form his lack of knowledge and it worked the media focused on sweetie remark instead of him avoiding the question. you woul dbe ignorrant if you voted for him. Please stay awy from main stream obama supporting media lik MSNBC and CNN.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Obama is nothing more than a creation by the media and the republicans. He nothing nothing about the world, policies, diplomacy, geography, nothing. he is freinds with terrorist he is as crooked as he can be. Aren’t you afrain of a mna who can not answer questins unless they are presreened by his staff. And when he talk on his own he he looks like and idiot. He couldn’t even answer a question in Oregan so he called th ereport “sweetie” to divert attention form his lack of knowledge and it worked the media focused on sweetie remark instead of him avoiding the question. you woul dbe ignorrant if you voted for him. Please stay awy from main stream obama supporting media lik MSNBC and CNN.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Who gives a damn what Karl Rove says? How accurate was his 2006 map when he claimed the math was on his side? He’s nothing when he cant dictate political races by playing to the biggotry of his electorate (circa WV and SC 2000) and McCain having a black baby. Karl Rove is a major reason why the political process has reached the heights of uglinees it has. His math will be just as accurate come November as it was 2006.
Posted by: EF | May 19, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Shame on ABC! This is like asking Al Gore’s opinion on Bush/McCain. What a sick joke. And a sick post.
Posted by: Robert | May 19, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
jp,michigan – Your electoral votes are imaginary since they aren’t given until November. Your popular count is wrong also, where did you get your totals?
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | May 19, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Anyone reading this article and believing it is news is completely out of touch with reality. This is ABC new not real news. Karl Rove??? Do you think he is doing this as a public service? He’s a political strategist and election manipulator.
Posted by: thesandworm | May 19, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Rove!! Now there’s a man I trust. He gave me eight ungodly years of charming zero. Point is, if Rove says one thing, the opposite is what’s really bothering him: Obama.
Posted by: faulpelz | May 19, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Voters in OREGON need to be concernd because obama supporters have been stealing ballots for Hilllary and disposing of them. They have also been steeling people identity and casting votes for Obama. When people go to the court house they are told they can not vote becuase their vote has already been cast. They are all Hillary supports. Obama supporters are violent dishonest people who cheat because they know thatis the only way he can steal the election.
Posted by: mel | May 19, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
I’m voting for Obama. I just got my section 8 approved last week and I’ve been getting food stamps for 4 months now. The only thing I need to live a work (and stress) free life is free healthcare. Obama’s plan gives the most benefits for the least cost (zero). He da man! Obama ’08!!!
Posted by: Darnell | May 19, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
MEL. this may just be a case, basically, of, “he who smelt it, delt it”. hillary, macain, and bush….and bill, are the definition of manufactured popularity.
Posted by: tom | May 19, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
7 years of the bungling Bush’s destruction of America is Karl Rove’s calling card? lol
Helping to elect the lost President of 911 is Karl Roves calling card?
Karl Rove is a bottom feeder.
Karl Rove represents the lowest kind of ‘human’ behavior: Win ugly and govern even uglier!
That is Karl Rove & Bush!
The classless Clintons tried the same slimy Karl Rove gutter politics.
And they are now walking around like zombies. The Karl Rove Klintons can’t even realize that IT IS OVER, HILARY!
Karl Rove and the Klintons have been banished by a more aware American electorate, who has a Law Professor guiding their thinking to a better America.
Karl Rove is just trying to be relevant, until he receives the subpoena from the US Congress for his White House illegalites.
Posted by: Patriot | May 19, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Ex-Democrat, I just went to your site to look at that. Obama would probably just say, “Well, Michelle is just like some old Aunt…….
Posted by: Melanie | May 19, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Rove would say that Hillary has a better chance wouldn’t he? He WANTS Hillary running because he KNOWS the Republicans can have a field day with her and he knows that BITTER Hillary supporters are more likely to vote McCain just to SPITE the man that beat her.
Posted by: Scott | May 19, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Lets think. Rove is a Republican, and he is telling us which one of our candidates would run better against McCain. So, that would matter to a democrat how?
Posted by: Albert | May 19, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
The staying power of Senator Clinton is a message for all of us: she will work just as hard to get this country back on track as she has criss-crossing the nation to meet the voters.
She has the intellect, the experience and the will to lead this country and lift us from the depths of the last seven years. I am not a Rove fan but he is right in this instance. Hillary is the stronger candidate. USVet is right. Obama is unelectable. McCain is an honorable man – but think Supreme Court; Women’s rights – equal pay for equal work; Bush tax cuts to the wealthy.
It is unconscionable for the media and others to insist that Senator Clinton drop out. She is not a quitter. She will finish what she started and it will lead to the White House.
Posted by: Karol | May 19, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
McCain has advantage on electoral college votes over Obama, Hillary has advantage over McCain. Swing states is the key to this election, Hillary won in those states while Obama lost. Hillary will carry Kentucky, Arkansas, WV, Ohio in general election; these are the states Kerry lost to Bush in 2004.
Hillary will be the nominee of the party, superdelegates is looking at the map, not the math. They knew Obama’s popularity in primary are in Republican controlled states and will remain Republican in general election.
Posted by: Les | May 19, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Rove gave Obama advice on how to win the Iowa primary (it was published in the Financial Times). He later gave Obama advice on how to win the Democratic nomination (it was in Newsweek). Rove knows Obama is a loser. Obama’s wife, Michelle has a big mouth. Her mouth together with Obama’s associations and past will sink the Democrats in November.
Can we say President McCain?
Posted by: George | May 19, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
You know, we grew up poor and I don’t make much money now, but I’ve NEVER taken any government handouts. However I do know wealthy upper middle class people who took government handouts they didn’t need. They also pay far less a percentage of federal tax than I do. It’s rediculess what lies the upper classes will push into your brain when the truth is the biggest pilferers of govt handouts and government tax shelters is the upper classes.
Posted by: Scott | May 19, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
WELL PUT LESS!
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Obama believes there are 57 States in the Union and doesn’t know Hanford cleanup. Yeah, this guy is Presidential.
Where did the Democrats find this guy?
Posted by: Sam | May 19, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Oh please – has ABC no ability to evaluate the newsworthiness of what they call news?? I’m sure Karl Rove has no ulterior motive for wanting to push Hillary as the candidate. Everyone knows nothing would better unite the Republican Party than Clinton as our nominee.
Posted by: Twilight blogger | May 19, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Obama can’t even win MA a heavily democratic state. Hillary won it in the primary and she will win it in the genral election. If obama is the nominee McCain will win MA. That says soeemthing about his (un)electability?
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
OREGON VOTERS LISTEN UP obama thinks the Great Lakes are in Oregon..You can tell that he really cares about your state. Oregon Voters beware of Obama!
Vote smart vote HILLARY
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Karl Rove, ahh yes the Gore Vidal of the disaster administration. Karl and George, kind of a bookend set, proclivity, sensibility, and a mind set to engage the American male in such a way that would make a sub-gender more powerful. In other words, tweaking the nose of straight men, especially the armed forces of America’s defense, and the military hierarchy who have damaged Karl’s feelings, and made George uncomfortable about his entire life. What better way than to have a group of fairies dictating military deployment. Nero, Caligula, already been there and got the t-shirt. But then they bought themselves a guard, as long as the money lasted, so existed the cruelty and control. Who would think of entering into a 3500 year conflict, with hopes of making a deal?????? I thought Bush was a history major, maybe that was the history of the four hands banking group. Karl Rove, a great American, lost in love, and he don’t know why. I guess when the Bush admin is done all of the girlie men will get together and reminisce how they made those men pay.
Posted by: Richard | May 19, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Sam, Obama got America confused with the muslim states he supports.
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Obama openly admitted in his book that he hates white people.He said “I developed a hate for his mother’s race”
his mother is white.
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Clinton and McCain supporters can do nothing but spew fear and garbage to bully people into voting for their candidates. It is really a shame, and not going to work very well come November. Obama is going win in a landslide because he’s the only candidate that has common sense, and the American people can see it clearly.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
I dislike Karl Rove, but I can’t dispute his expertise as an election strategist. If the Republicans had put forth a stronger candidate, Obama would be toast in November. But McCain, with his all-over-the-road philosophies does NOT have a strong base of support. By supporting Bush’s War and also supporting Al Gore’s junk science, McCain is trying to please everyone, but this simply doesn’t work.
Posted by: Rhys | May 19, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
He claims he had a hummble begging. lets see. He was raised a muslim until he was four, then he went to the best private schools in the united states. His grandmother was a wealthy white woman who paid for his expensive schools, and yet he calls her a racist.
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
And by the way, Obama can criticize Bush, Mccain and Clinton but that’s all he does. Never anything substantial! Just critical of everyone and whine, whine, whine, whine…..Go tell it to Wright, Ayers, Rezko and his family in the middle east!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
OF COURSE ROVE WANTS CLINTON!!!
People these are the Republicans, what do you think they are going to say?? We want to run against Obama knowing he is going to crush McCain??
The Republicans know Hillary has such high negatives and with all the baggage and the SNIPER FIRE lies, they can beat her with their eyes closed!!
Who had a ralley in Oregon with 75,000 people in attendance yesterday?
Who had a rally in somebody’s backyard in Kentucky yesterday begging for money?
PLEASE LOOK AT WHERE THIS IS COMING FROM AND GIVE ME A BREAK!!
Obama 08!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Rove wants a Republican so he’s hoping Hillary will run against McCain. He knows Hillary is unelectable.
Posted by: bluecollardem | May 19, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Why do people keep alluding to karl rove? hes a sleaze and a disgrace to politics. the way he ran the bush campaign has left a horrible taste in the mouths of america. Karl rove can say nothing to me that will ever warrant some credibility. Isnt he supposed to be arrested by now
Posted by: Allamr18 | May 19, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
One word!
OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE
A VOTE FOR OBAMA IS AVOTE FOR MCCAIN!
Posted by: Janette | May 19, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Well that is an endorsement I think any Democrat would question.
Why would Rove be attacking Obama while saying that Hillary is a stronger candidate? These guys have been going after Obama for a couple of months now while ignoring Clinton.
You don’t think there might be a little spin here do you?
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | May 19, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
DAVIS plez be honest the only reason there were over 70,000 people was because it was a BON JOVI concert don’t try to spin it like the media. They were there to see Bon Jovi NOT OBAMA! there were tons of Hillary supporters that started protesting because he was there and they came to see Bon JOvi. You must be a paid blogger trying to lie now you stop that that is bad!
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
For the first time in MY life, I’m proud that America is handing Dems defeat the one time it actually looked like an automatic win.. NoBama ’08.
Posted by: West Va Dem | May 19, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Obama supporters who claims there were 75thousand people at OR yesterday!
There were 100thousand in NewYork at Elton John concert, inside and outside of the radio City when Elton John endorsed Hillary last month!Do not spin thing around it won’t work!
Posted by: Bill, NU | May 19, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
How does “what Rove wants” affect the average of polls?
Look at the data. If there’s something factually wrong or misleading about it, say so.
Posted by: Evie | May 19, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
What Rove lie to make Obama look bad? Never! Not in this counry!
Posted by: D.Rust | May 19, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Janette,
You have to get over this, Hillary is running on fumes now. She was begging for money in somebody’s back yard in Kentucky yesterday. She is done…
Obama is flush with cash and holding rallys with 75,000 people attending!
I guess you just can’t gauge the mood in the country very well, people are ready for a change and they do not want 4 more years of Bush…
Obama is going to change the color of all the states this fall and win in one of the biggest landslides this country has ever seen!
Like a Republican said this weekend, if the Republican name was on dog food they would be taking it off the shelves because nobody would be buying it…
President Obama in 2008 baby!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
LOL. This is cute. Rove is lying to make Senator Obama look bad. Shows you how concerned they are about him. He is going to kick McCain’s a$$ in the general election.
Posted by: Munk | May 19, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Hey WEST VIRGINIA DEM. I love what happened in WV last week. Your state is AWESOME! Obama lost WV by 41 points! love it!
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Come on Bill, NU,
Those 100,000 people at the “Elton John” concert weren’t there to see Hillary pal…
Conversely those 75,000 people in Oregon were there for one thing, to hear Mr. Obama speak. Also to catch a glance of the next PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!
Go Obama!
Give me a break!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Get the brother out of the race. He can’t win and the real dems know it!
Posted by: Angry Black Man | May 19, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
McCain has so many evidebce against Obama!
Hill should drop out so we can start using these evidence!
1- Obama’s Gaza campaign run by hamas!
2- Obama’s wife at Jeremiah Wright’s church calling majority of Americans whitey!
3- Obama video capured him being at FL listening Jeremiah Wright’s speech against the US Goverment !
(I thought Obama said he did not hear anything!)
Hillary needs to drop out so the circus can begin!
Posted by: SUE | May 19, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
ANGRY BLACK MAN, your statment is more proof that Obama is only there because the republican put him there to steal the nomination away from Hillary. McCain will destroy Obama if the dems cheat and give him the nomination. Vote smart Vote Hillary!
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Here is the new math!
Obama wins nomination! – Clinton supporters re=ject him!
Obama-Hill supporters = MCCAIN victory
Posted by: Ted | May 19, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
In the general election it will take grit to win.
Obama attracts a lot of people through star power, but he has been suspiciously silent on his ties to terrorists and palestinian movements. The Republicans are salavating at opportunity of exposing Barack and Michelle.
Hillary has horse power and the grit to go with it. In a slug fest Hillary will win because she knows the painful lesson of 2004. She has withstood the onslaught of Media hype.
Obama has already shown his emotional insecurity when attacked, and he hasn’t seen anything yet.
Posted by: appul | May 19, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
DNC made many enemies!
serously McCain will be walking to the White House by Hillary supporters votes
Posted by: Ted | May 19, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Hey WEST VIRGINIA DEM. I love what happened in WV last week. Your state is AWESOME! Obama lost WV by 41 points! love it!
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
The media and the Democrat elite have already selected Obama. I have come to like Hillary for her staying power but it is too little too late. In the eyes of Dems, Hillary has become just a malcontent bucking the DNC system.
Posted by: Bill | May 19, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
I don’t think Rove is lying. Has anyone come out today to say that he is full of it? Obama is unelectable and the democrats may as well just face the fact that there will be a republican president next year, unless Hillary gets a miracle. Hillary is ahead in KY by 36 points and she has really closed the gap in Oregon. Unless there is a miracle, she won’t win Oregon, but the fact that the trend has been in her favor for the past two weeks in a state as liberal as Oregon ought to give the SD’s pause.
Posted by: Susan | May 19, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
MEL,
I wish I got paid for writing my opinions about my favorite candidate. Funny, all I heard was cheering coming from the 75,000+ crowd, and that cheering was for Obama!
I heard nothing about Bon Jovi anywhere and I think your lying, just like your SNIPER FIRE BOSNIA candidate. Show me a link to an article about that!
Hillary is done, get over it – sore loser!
Go Obama 2008!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
HEY DAVIS!
I am not a liar like you! There were 100,000 people in NY, manhattan at radio City and outside at April, 9th, 2008 to see Hillary & Bill Clinton and listen to Elton John!
People who went to the concert also paid tickets starting from $250 up to $2300 for fundraising donations!
Outside crowd was just standing out there to get a cahnce to see them!
If you do not belive google it!
Posted by: Bil, Nu | May 19, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
I’m a Hillary supporter who is either voting McCain or not voting. No way curious George gets my vote.
Posted by: MaxiDial | May 19, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Is this the same Karl Rove who said the Republicans would in BIG in congress in 2006. He is a great anti-predictor.
Posted by: slim | May 19, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
“And by the way, Obama can criticize Bush, Mccain and Clinton but that’s all he does. Never anything substantial! Just critical of everyone and whine, whine, whine, whine…..Go tell it to Wright, Ayers, Rezko and his family in the middle east!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008 6:38:03 PM”
God, I couldn’t agree more. All of that “hope” talk was just bs. He goes negative while making it seem like he is taking the high road. And he’s a weaker general election candidate! That’s obvious from the electoral vote tallies in the primary.
Where’s countallthevotes tonight?
Posted by: 57 states and counting | May 19, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
DL:
If B O should win the nomination, the world MIGHT blow up!!!!!
Be careful what you wish for!
Be Smart!
Vote for Hillary
Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | May 19, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
DAVIS, I love the way you keep bring up the sniper incident it is so funny that is the only thing you can say against Hillary she is Claen Obama is the one with the Rezko ties, the ties to weather underground and all of the other terrorist and muslims that hate this country so keep talking about sniper fire it is amusing. i have no more comments for you you are not worth my time you are to busy being a liming in Obama’s occult. VOTE SMART VOTE HILLARY!
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
I think stars in space have 21 crystals in them, with sacred geometry numbers 4031-718-29.
I think babies in Australia are in danger of bieng switched with a clone. They kill babies that glow in the dark. Start making a chain necklace with an I.D tag that cant be duplicated. It should lock tightly around the babies neck so you will know if she/he is a clone or not.
Posted by: Scott H Florance | May 19, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Bil, Nu,
Yes there was a big crowd trying to get a glance at Elton John, you are absolutely right…
Anyway that was when Hillary was relevant, but sadly today she cannot even fill a “backyard” in Kentucky.
Instead of selling all those high priced tickets to Elton’s concert now, she is begging for money in someones backyard.
That is because Hillary is now IRRELEVANT and finished!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Sue:
Why would Hillary leave the race
if what you say is true?
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!
Posted by: earful | May 19, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
I am ready to “girlcott” this election if Hillary is not on the ticket. No Hillary, no vote.
Posted by: thecandypoem | May 19, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Mel,
I have a lot more for you besides the Sniper fire lie, believe me!
But I am still waiting for that link to the Bon Jovi concert lie…
I just figure anyone I mean anyone that could vote for a presidential candidate, that stands up in front of the cameras, 4 times and tells such a whopper of a sniper fire lie, must lack integrity! And you are sure proving it here!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
davis:
Hillary comes to the people.
B O needs props (8 or 9 oversized flags) and a teleprompter to say
what he has to say.
There’s pretty much been a blackout on Hillary’s activities.
With Obama, each fart is a shot heard round the world.
Still a hell of a lot of people want her for their president.
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: earful | May 19, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Bush/ Cheney 08!!!
A vote for Hillary is a guaranteed win for McCain!
Posted by: GimmeOil | May 19, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Of course Hillary is stronger! That’s why she staying in the race until the convention! That’s what she’s been trying to tell people. Mr. Hopey-Changey CANNOT WIN IN NOVEMBER! Duh.
Posted by: Vickie | May 19, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Davis!
Hillary can fill in more people now in NY if she hold a rally!
because since Rev Wright broke out and Hamas endorsment became an issue, despite of the superdelegates endorsments, Obama is loosing his butt to Hillary!
She is stronger than a month ago now!
Probably that is a fact for Ted Kennedy to have a stroke! democratic Part is for Obama but not the American people!
Posted by: Bill,NU | May 19, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
earful,
I am with you!! Take it to the convention, Hillary!!! IT IS THE MAP, NOT THE MATH!! HILLARY’S VOTES TRANSLATE TO AN ELECTORAL COLLEGE WIN; OBAMA’S DO NOT. GE IS NOT BASED ON CAUCUSES EITHER. WINNER TAKE ALL ADN EACH PERSON GETS A VOTE.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
If you want 4 more years of Jimmy Carter vote for Obama.
Posted by: Thumb | May 19, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
The cany poem , I completey agreee with you I think all Hillary supporters should switch to republican just to show the DNC that we are fed up with their lies and dishonesty. I will vote for McCAin in Hillary is no the nomination. NOBAMA!
Posted by: MEL | May 19, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
92.9% chance Mr. Obama is the canidate according to Rassmussen today, President Obama will win and who cares what the felon karl rove thinks.
Posted by: richard | May 19, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Bush’s brain has obviously lost his mind.
Posted by: Vet | May 19, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Rove should be in Jail…Prison
Posted by: spoon2456 | May 19, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
mel:
it’s true; the power of the press is backing B O for president…. and the DNC is selling our votes to the highest bidder by permitting (ENCOURAGING) their delegates to accept money from the candidates.
it’s like something out of george orwell…. and if i didn’t see it, i wouldn’t believe it.
even if I WEREN’T for Clinton, I would vote for her just to prove that we still have free will!!!
Posted by: the power of the press | May 19, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
obama has won nothing, zero nada zilch , since the rev. – you can count nc if you want, but with only 26% of the white vote, obama proves he’s doa in the ge…
bo smells like dukakis
Posted by: g | May 19, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Bill,NU,
You are just as delusional as your candidate Hillary. Her campaign is broke, and in debt over 20+ million dollars.
She is doing fund raisers begging for money in a backyard in Kentucky yesterday…
She is behind 200 or so delegates, she is behind in super delegates and in states won. You don’t even see her on the TV news or Cable stations anymore…
And you say she is stronger and winning??
Wow, and I thought the denial was coming to an end for you Hillary supporters!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
The real news is that London has launched its attack on Obama, in a number of news stories, typified by the Feb. 26 London Times story by James Bone and Dominic Kennedy, headlined “Mansion ‘Mistake’ Piles the Pressure on Barack Obama.” London, typified by Times owner Rupert Murdoch, has the file on Obama, and it has signaled that it is ready to pull the plug on him—but only after Obama has completed his final assignment: the elimination of Hillary Clinton from the Democratic Party.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
The best thing about Rove’s maps is that he has McCain losing to BOTH Obama AND Clinton. Either way, the dems win! Obama ’08!
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
It’s the map not the math. In addition to the popular vote, the electoral map shows Hillary with a cushion and Obama with a deficit. If you translate her wins in the primaries she has won 311 electoral votes to Obama’s 217.
Also:
She is ahead in the popular vote by 50,000 votes, counting Florida and Michigan which must be counted. She intends to continue to lead in the popular vote when June 3 comes around and everyone has voted.
This is hard data to ignore.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Obama is currently favored in Wisconsin by every other measure other than Karl Rove’s concepts.
If you give Wisconsin, correctly, to Obama, he is now ahead of McCain, 231-228, with 79 still in toss-up.
Now let’s look at toss-up states. Both Clinton and Obama are strongly favored in New Mexico, where Rove incorrectly has listed as a toss-up.
For Obama, he is strongly (used in this context by more than the margin Rove outlines) favored in Colorado and Iowa.
Clinton would also win Minnesota, where it is listed as a toss-up.
By those new numbers, from other, more unbiased polling, you’re looking at:
Obama v. McCain
Obama – 252
McCain – 228
Toss ups – 58
Obama v. Clinton
Clinton – 274
McCain – 206
Toss ups – 58
As you can see, both Democrats do massively better than he wants you to believe, with Clinton actually already above the 270 needed, and Obama just needing two or so of those toss-up states. I personally think he will pull out Ohio and Michigan because of the economics of the region (I’m from Ohio), and that would put him over the top, without even putting into play Virginia, North Carolina, and many other western and southern states that the Democratic money machine could force McCain to defend.
We need a Democratic president to help us fix our policies, let’s support whoever comes out of this primary on top.
I’m not saying this to make nice with either side (I’m for either one). I can’t afford health care and they just raised it on me another 30%. My family needs a president who will actually care and do something about that, and that, unfortunately, isn’t McCain.
Democrats ’08 and Beyond
Posted by: The Real Math | May 19, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
jlynne,
Powerful and I agree.
Hillary 08
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
I guess you’re not seeing what the voters say!
WV, even IN went for Hillary!
Tomorrow in KT we will see it again!
Sure you won’t see, as long as you watch NBC , MSNBC and CNN cable news!
You should consider to cehck on FOXNews a bit!
Obama can win only in states populated with blacks or in Red states Republicans can vote, He is not the majority of the Democrat whites candidate!
Posted by: Bill, NU | May 19, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
The only thing Clinton will win is a trip back to Arkansas, or wherever she now lives. Her campaign is broke because she squandered some $30 million in contributions on a failed campaign. If Clinton cannot even run a campaign, how in the world is she going to run the country?! Give me a break. She needs to drop out tomorrow so that the party can unite behind Obama for November.
Posted by: Eric | May 19, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
What I do not understand why certain people are so weak…for example James Carville says he thinks Hillary would make a better President, but he will not stand up and vote for her. Or Newt Gingrich believes Hillary would make a stronger candidate and President and so forth but these men are folding and going with the flow—the Obama Flow. If you think that someone will do a better job for our Nation you should do everything in your power to get that person in office…even John Edwards a week earlier than his announcement said that Hillary was the stronger candidate and yet he too folds. These people are destroying our country as they have no principals left.
Posted by: Anne | May 19, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Yes, Eric, Obama is winning states like Washington, Iowa, and Oregon because of the powerful black vote and republican base in those states. You caught on; I’m glad we didn’t fool you.
Posted by: Democrats '08 | May 19, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Man there are some really nasty pieces of work here. Start with the first Axelrod employed poster ‘Eric’. Some people need to be taken to task and spanked. Eric – you come now! You got school in the morning!
Posted by: Eric's Mom | May 19, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Eric,
Clinton has a “failed campaign?” Then why are you even blogging for Obama. Hey, take a break, relax!! Did you know that if you count FL and MI, Hillary has 55% popular vote to Obama’s 45? Did you know that 8o% of Obama’s lead in the pledged delegate count is due to CAUCUSES, WHICH ARE HIGHLY SUSPECT IN THAT THEY DISADVANTAGE HER VOTER BASE?
Failed campaign, you say? Again. then sit back and relax. Oh, by the way, watch out for KY and PR. They will make your hair curl.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Ever since Rhode Island,
BO is in a horrible losing streak, he only picked up North Carolina. He lost
Rhode Island, Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, Indiana. West Virginia
Landslide losses in Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia.
Tomorrow landslide losses in Kentucky.
In general election, he is such a liability that no party pundit can save him in downhill struggles of general election.
Hillary has been holding back. If Rev. Wright was brought up before IOWA, BO would be out of the picture long ago. He would still in trouble in GE.
If the democratic party losses this election, McCain with his experience mend the damages of war and the economy gets back on foot by itself, The Republic will reign for many more years.
Posted by: John_Lai | May 19, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Tuesday Obama will try to steal the nomination in much the same way that Bush stole the 2000 election. He will declare victory when there is none.
He sees victory slipping away and is clinging to hope out of desperation.
His superdelegate endorsements have slowed to a trickle, if even that.
He is behind in the popular vote if we still value democracy and this is still a country made up of 50 states.
He wants to claim victory before the DNC Rules Committee meets on the 31st and recognizes the voters of FL and MI.
The inequity of the delegate system is being questioned, particularly with the involvement of Obama’s caucus thugs.
Most people are starting to see Obama can’t win the electoral votes, meaning he can’t win in November.
Most people are starting to see that Hillary won the big states, which are needed to win in November.
Most people are starting to see that Hillary has real plans for the economy, healthcare, and more. Not copies.
He will not have reached the 2209 delegates needed to declare victory or even the arbitrary figure of 2025 delegates.
He has pulled a lot of Chicago-style tricks during this primary, but I don’t think this one will work.
In the end good old-fashioned hard work, accomplishments, experience, knowledge, worldliness, maturity, good judgement, and the love of this country will prevail.
HILLARY CLINTON FOR PEACE & PROSPERITY
Posted by: Dave | May 19, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Clinton is stronger this is why the media (mainly owned by republicans affiliates) have pushed so hard for Obama. The same thing happened in the French presidential election a year ago when the weakest candidates of the socialist party (a woman by the way) rode an unprecedented media wave to become the nominee of her party to easily lost the general election thereafter.
Posted by: benhibou | May 19, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Let Obama play checkers with the evil dictator of Iran if he wants.
Let Hillary or McCain run the country.
Posted by: Carol 17 | May 19, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
NARAL lit the fire on a growing movement against Obama.
The ‘won’t vote for Obama’ movement was just getting started and needed a catalyst like this to coalesce.
More websites have popped up in addition to petitions pledging not to vote for Obama.
The DNC and Obama have treated Hillary Clinton with amazing disrespect. Women have had it. And, their fathers, husbands, and sons agree.
Hell hath no fury like that of a woman scorned.
There won’t be any backing off.
Hillary is ahead in the popular vote and in the electoral votes.
The delegates are based on a corrupt caucus system and are further corrupted by Obama’s thugs going in and pushing, blocking, throwing out, and threatening voters.
TX is a prime example of some of this mayhem. Hillary won the legitimate Texas primary, but “somehow” lost the delegates. Delegates are useless, corrupt, and meaningless.
If Hillary is denied the nomination we would rather put up with 4 years of McCain, who will have his hands tied by a Democratic Congress, than put up with a corrupt, lying, cult leader who has no experience whatsoever.
And, believe me, WE MEAN IT.
Posted by: JENNIFER | May 19, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Rove’s brain must be the size of a pea. For anyone who has a brain knows Hillary is a Republican Implant, aimed at destroying the Democratic Party! Hillary will be lucky to win her own seat back when it comes up for Re-Election.We also know alot of Republicans crossed over just to try and help Hillary Win, cause we all know McCain would beat Hillary.
Posted by: Demo Rules | May 19, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Clinton will win.
Enough said.
Peace for our Country!
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Bill, NU,
You’re kidding me right? You get your news from FOX news? Ha, ha!
No self respecting Democrat would ever get their news from FOX. Of course they probably say she is winning, they and Karl Rove want her to win!
In case you haven’t heard FOX is in the tank for the Republicans, fool…
Rove and all the Republicans want Hillary to win, because they know they can crush her in the GE because she has so much baggage.
If by some miracle she was to pull this thing out of a nose dive for the ground, the McBush campaign would be playing that Sniper fire lie thing on a continuous loop all during the month of October, they wouldn’t even need an October surprise for her!!
I bet you heard Hillary is still got a chance to win right straight from Hannity, am I right??
Ha, ha, ha!!!!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Electoral Votes? What’s that? Oh…pardon me…Electoral Vote is something Dems have been saying “don’t count” for the lasy 8 years. Now, all of the sudden, electoral votes have become an important issue. Yike! “don’t count Florida & Michigan” then “count Florida & Michigan”; “electoral votes mean nothing” then “electoral votes are important”…YIKE! YIKE! YIKE! Has anyone seen the consistent pattern of behaviour?
Posted by: ablanche08 | May 19, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
I can’t believe that you are actually reporting this. Karl Rove, the Republican stratagist supreme, with his own maps put together by his own firm showing Clinton ahead. Give me a break. They will do or say anything to have their run against Clinton who they know they have a better chance of beating than Obama. This is so no news.
Posted by: dora | May 19, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
This is not the first time voting has taken place by caucus only the first time that people have whined tirelessly about it. Hillary’s supporters continue to complain that when she has not done well it’s because of something out of her hands. NONSENSE. She didn’t lose the nomination because of the press, bias, sexism, on and on, she lost because in the AGREED UPON contest more people voted for Obama, period.
Posted by: fool me once | May 19, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
THe republicans know how to beat Hillary but they are afraid of BO. It is so funny to watch these guys politic for Hillary. Karl Rove needs to shut his mouth and thank God he isnot in prison
Posted by: Randy | May 19, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Ladies. You need to Chill. Look at the math. Obama clearly wins and it’s his moment to shine. Hilary is amazing, but her comeback has arrived 6 months to late.
Posted by: Mr C | May 19, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Clinton is fighting the wrong fight. Gosh, why can’t she figure that out. The current contest is for delegate votes!
The electorial map is gonna get shifted this year, just like it does every 16 years. Didn’t Obama tell y’all early on that he wasn’t gonna stand for dividing the country into red states and blue states? Pay attention!
Obama is taking the country by storm and we’ll all be the better for it!
Obama ’08!
(Just one more day to go)
Posted by: Happy | May 19, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
JENNIFER,
You will change your tune in November, when you realize that McBush has vowed to replace the two “liberal judges” on the Supreme Court (that will be retiring in the next 4 years) with the most conservative ones he can find. Also he has not only stated that, but also said there will be a litmus test – Guess what that will be??
If McCain gets in there you and all of your pro-choice girlfriends can say goodbye to Roe v Wade. Maybe your to young to know what this all means, so perhaps you might ask some women who had to get illegal abortions in the 1960′s and early 1970′s.
I think come November you and all your friends will be standing in line to vote Democatic….
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Yeah, Rove’s just the guy I look to when I want to know what ISN’T going to happen in an upcoming election. Am I just high or isn’t Rove the guy who guaranteed the Republicans would win the last mid-term election…
Posted by: Mr Meelie | May 19, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
fool me once,
“Agreed upon” process for the Democratic primaries?? No one asked me. Did anyone ask you?
The DNC should throw out their process as no one can figure it out and it does not even remotely follow or predict the Electoral Vote for the GE.
All kidding aside, what was the DNC trying to do? Their process is a disaster. I say this not as a Clinton supporter but as a Democrat. What were they thinking? What were they trying to accomplish? Why not make the Dem. primaries a real test run of the GE?
Does anyone know? We, as Democrats, looks like a bunch of fools.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Just heard on the news that Obama is in trouble in Oregon..seems like there is a turnaround in support! Whooppppppeeeee!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Why does anyone listen to this idiot? If he was so damn smart why did the Republicans take such a bath in 2006? He is evil, had a pure evil political agenda and yet the mainstream media keep going to him over and over again? First ABC conducts a shameful debate and now this. What are you guys, Fox light?
Posted by: nic | May 19, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
As much as I hated it, I had to have Bush as my president for 8 years. But, at least, he gets to get out at some point. That’s democracy. That’s something many nations don’t have, where a dictator had to be killed to get him out of power. God bless America.
The won’t vote Obama people I suspect they are not 80,000 strong nation wide. They can wait 8 years.
Posted by: Gillis | May 19, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
pattydaggs,
I read that also and actually heard a clip of Obama uttering thsoe words. I cannot believe he said that. How foolish!
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
NOW do you believe Hillary is a Republican?! Geesh!!!
For Hillary: Rush, Rove, McCain (did you see SNL?)
For Obama: The people of the “United” States of America
Go Obama 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Happy | May 19, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
pattydaggs,
Keep dreaming and come back here tomorrow at this time, when the Networks call Oregon for Obama with a 20 point lead!
Go Obama 08!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
I will burn my house down before I vote for Obama. If he somehow succeed in taking his B lack Liberation to the White House, along with his birds-of-the-same-feather gang of his “I make over $300,000 a year for being a PR person for a non-profit hospital” wife or Bill “I stomped on the American Flag in 2003″ Ayers and company, America will in DEEP DEEP trouble.
Congratualtions President McCain (in that case)!
Br en t
Posted by: matt | May 19, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
nic,
You may not like Rove, but he is a political genius.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
JENNIFER,
You will change your tune in November, when you realize that McBush has vowed to replace the two “liberal judges” on the Supreme Court (that will be retiring in the next 4 years) with the most conservative ones he can find. Also he has not only stated that, but also said there will be a litmus test – Guess what that will be??
If McCain gets in there you and all of your pro-choice girlfriends can say goodbye to Roe v Wade. Maybe your to young to know what this all means, so perhaps you might ask some women who had to get illegal abortions in the 1960′s and early 1970′s.
I think come November you and all your girlfriends will be standing in line to vote Democatic….
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
count all Hillary’s votes
You can’t wait till the game ends to decide the rules. Where was all this insight when it could have mattered, maybe you shouldn’t have been out buying a outfit for Hillary’s coronation.
Posted by: fool me once | May 19, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
countallthevotes,
He is a Republican and he wants REPUBLICANS TO WIN! As such he wants the weaker candidate to run against! You believe his nonsense?
The one with the least money and the MOST baggage period! And that would be broke Hillary!!!
Her las big rally was yesterday in somebody’s backyard in Kentucky, where she was begging for more money…
When was the last time you heard Obama ask for money???
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Michelle Obama will be the main reason Obama loses the general election. She has shown nothing but disrespect and hate for this country but is now trying to make nice. People just will not buy her line of crap.
Posted by: GrannyMI | May 19, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
That Obama guy always makes me so sick. I’ve lost 10 lb. already by listening to his voice with that infamous “uh..uh…”. Gosh, that kills me! For anyone who hate his speeches and get annoyed by his disgusting voice, then you’d guaranteed to lose weight without spending a dime!
Posted by: tiger | May 19, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
pattydaggs,
Sorry the truth makes you sick, but that doesn’t change anything…
The truth is the TRUTH! Get over being a sore LOSER and look at the BIG picture!
Obama 08!
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
PRESIDENTIAL POLL
05/19/08…thewhitehouse.com
Averages (an average of 11 Major National Polls)05/19/08/
McCain vs Obama:
McCain: 43.6 Obama: 47.5 Other: 8.9
McCain vs Clinton:
McCain: 43.5 Clinton: 48 Other: 8.5
Posted by: 07001 | May 19, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
BO supporters and Democrats who hate the Clintons, “what offends you most, peace or prosperity?”, to quote a Clinton adviser.
Posted by: cb | May 19, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
We can’t afford for the Supreme Court to go conservative and it’s more than just Roe v Wade. You can vote Obama out in 4 years but the justices are their for life. I would never vote for McCain for this very reason. We need to think ahead and just the next 4 years.
Posted by: lisa | May 19, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
cb,
Would prosperity include the 1.8 Trillion dollars added to the National debt during the Clinton administration???
Posted by: Davis | May 19, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Davis, please provide support for your incorrect and stupid statement that Clinton added 1.8 trillion to the national debt. Can’t wait to see!!!
Posted by: Davisisanass | May 19, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
This is no surprise. Karl Rove is a GOP supporter, so unlike the rest involved in the media, he is not biased toward Obama, so his prediction is not tilted. There is no doubt that Clinton is the stronger Democratic candidate in November, and I expect McCain to become even stronger against Obama once the GOP strangles the life out of Obama’s association with the Rev. Wright. It’s not too late for the Democratic Party to finally look after Clinton in this contest, which they have not done at all in the slightest. Clinton will beat McCain in November. McCain will beat Obama in November.
Posted by: Stephanie | May 19, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Rove has a good grasp of the obvious. If the delegates for the dem primaries were like the general election Clinton would be the winner. Why would people be surprised?
Posted by: ChrisA | May 19, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
cb,
Neither. We love peace AND prosperity.
The difference is that true hard-working Democratic Americans figure out how to thrive whether its hard times or good times. Now that being said, true Democratics also care about pulling those poor Hillary Clinton supporters up out of their gutters, too.
You know damned well that Rove does not care about you. Rove cares only about serving up Clinton for the Republicans to beat her back down.
It would be an act of mercy towards Clinton if her supporters would get behind Obama now so that the Republicans won’t get to humiliate her further. Think of it as sparing her an even more brutal, abusive emotional beating than Bill ever served her. She’s suffered enough, yes?
Best wishes on your choice.
Obama ’08!
Posted by: Happy | May 19, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Stephanie and ChrisA have it right. Hillary puts Florida in play/wins it outright. O-wa-wa-wa didn’t want Florida’s votes to count. Hillary also wins Arkansas; the messiah doesn’t. Hillary is stronger than him in Ohio, where there are a lot of so-called “bitter and clingy” people. Then again, it’s a party tradition that the Dems choose the weaker candidate.
Posted by: 57 states and counting | May 19, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
So now Clinton’s back to listening to Rove, a guy who wants to destroy her. Didn’t know she was so into masochism. But then again, she’s is married to Bill.
Posted by: kravitz | May 19, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
It’s not just a few women that will not support Obama, it’s men and women in large numbers. I know if Hillary loses, I’ll be cutting a check for as much as possible to John McCain the next day. I still think before the convention, super delegates will be finding out more about Mr. Obama.
Posted by: Hillary for McCain | May 19, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Lisa, we don’t even want two days of Obama let alone 4 years of that idiot. The judges are a minor issue compared to where that idiot will take this country in four years. God forbid!!!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
pattydaggs you really need to get past the next 4 years. Like I said you can vote him out. But the Supreme Court has a major impact on this country and for you to think otherwise is just being naive. We can’t afford to have a conservative court.
Posted by: lisa | May 19, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
There were only two Democrats that could have lost the White House this year, Obama and Hillary, and only two Republicans that could have won the White House, McCain and Giuliani.
The Republicans wisely picked a candidate that can actually win.
Hillary is stronger than Obama. All the swing states that are must-wins for the Democrats have Hillary running 10 points ahead of Obama. It’s not that complicated to figure out, you don’t need Karl Rove to tell you this.
As a Republican, I’m glad Obama is the Democrat nominee. Just to see the look on all these pathetic Obama-worshipers the day after the election will be priceless.
Posted by: Juan Esperanza | May 19, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Juan Esperanza is correct. You don’t need Karl Rove. There is no doubt Hillary runs stronger in key states like Florida and Ohio. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Posted by: 57 states and counting | May 19, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Lisa, if you think the Supreme Court has be viable in the past..then think of all the stupidity that has come out of that sector in the past 10 years. It really can’t get any worst than it is!! I will not vote for a person who has as much bad baggage as Obama has and anyone who has been paying close attention to the facts would not vote for him either! Obama is the worst candidate that this country has put in place since Nixon! You think Nixon was nuts..Obama has him beat!!
Posted by: pattydaggs | May 19, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Rove -”Bush will be a great president.” Enough said!
Posted by: Nelly | May 19, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
I agree we should all listen to Karl Rove after all he’s the genius who lead america: to war in Iraq, torture is good for america, the debt that will disadvantage america’s future, medical care for the rich. Why isn’t he running for president, there seem to be plenty of people who believe in his policy that america should continue running full steam toward the cliff. God will save us.
Posted by: fool me once | May 19, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GUESS WHAT? THE RACE ISN’T OVER!
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: EGADS! | May 19, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
We NEED a conservative court system. It is more economically efficient.
Hillary would be a tougher match, mathematically and because she is a bull dog that doesn’t quit.
Posted by: jeff | May 19, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
you better believe it.
In addition to that, OBAMA has lost my and
11 of my friends votes.
I WILL NOT VOTE FOR MOVEON+OBAMA this fall! I am sick of this Dem. party!!
Posted by: very_mad | May 19, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
lisa,
Do you know anything about our Supreme Court? How many opinions have you even read? You promote yourself as some kind of authority. We have many fine justices, both as nominated by Dems and Repubs, you know.
The President merely nominates with the advice and consent of the Senate. There are hearings. Recall the Bork Hearings?? We will have a very strong Dem. Senate. There will be no Bork appointments.
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Hillary for McCain,
I am with you. If Obama is the nominee we in Mass will have T-Shirts:
Hillary Dems for McCain
Posted by: countallthevotes | May 19, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Lisa said: We can’t afford for the Supreme Court to go conservative and it’s more than just Roe v Wade. You can vote Obama out in 4 years but the justices are their for life. I would never vote for McCain for this very reason. We need to think ahead and just the next 4 years.
Roe v. Wade was replaced with Neighborhood planning v. something calling for partial term abortion. Meaning, if the fetus can survive outside of the womb, you can’t abort. Now, I may have some of this wrong. Anyway, I’m not going to support Obama on a single issue. It’s about all the issues. And, while the supreme court may overturn the latest case, there would be hell to pay in this country if it happened. I rather doubt that SC would do it even with a number of conservative justices.
Posted by: bluebird | May 19, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
DL:
You’re right!
Not only is “pattydaggs” enormously smart, she’s also extremely perceptive.
Obama’s state senatorial accomplishments were manufactured for him by Illinois Kingpicker Emil Jones.
In his final year in the senate he was handed bills which had been generated and worked on by other legistors to pass of as his own.. And B O did. And he returned the many favors with earmarks” .. Emil Jones was a beneficiary. Rezko was another.Even Michelle was a beneficiary when her employer was given a $1,000,000 grant!
Obama’s life story was manufactured by B O and presented to us in the guise of two semi-autobiographical novels,
That was all we knew about him when he decided to run for the presidency.
Since then we’ve had Obama’s laundry list of lies and too many “present” votes and a lot of questions seeking out the answers to a lot of murky problems.
Certainly you have questioned Hillary.
Certainly you are being nasty to McCain.
Why are you afraid to open your eyes to the R E A L Obama?
Are you afraid that if he got wet, he would sizzle and go up in smoke , like a witch?
Naah! that would be Michele!
Anyway,
Hillary just happens to be the best of our Candidates. Too bad you’re not open minded enough to acknowledge that!
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: EGADS! | May 19, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Hillary for McCain,
I am with you. If Obama is the nominee we in Mass will have T-Shirts:
Hillary Dems for McCain
Let me know where I can get one!
Posted by: bluebird | May 19, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
And yet the king called Obama is about to be crowned. guess he will be like humpty dumpty. All the king horses and all the kings men cant help humpty dumpty win an election in the fall. Gosh. How disturbing that the one candidate than can pull it off has been written off by the media and the weaker one has been given a free pass into the fall. How painful this is!
Posted by: roberincharlotte | May 19, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Doesn’t it seem a little curious that a Clinton supporter, supposedly who backs her policies, would make racist remarks about Obama? Your candidate would disagree I hope.
Posted by: Eugene | May 19, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
countallthevotes, how did I promote myself as an authority on the Supreme Court. McCain has already said that he will nominate conservative judges. And with Stevens being 88 I’m sure he will be retiring this term. They are all getting up there. Right now the court is pretty much balanced but will easily go conservative with McCain. Dems can fight the nominations all they want but eventually one will go through. Just my opinion and why I will never vote for McCain.
Posted by: lisa | May 19, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
bluebird, I was saying that the Supreme Court is NOT just about Roe v Wade. I was talking about the Supreme Court in general and that I want a dem in the white house to appoint our next justice.
Posted by: lisa | May 19, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Jake Tapper finally is making some sense. He has trashed Hillary and compare her with some crazy actor in a movie, that she always comes back no matter what.
well you egg head, see the map now and you know why!
Posted by: Nancy | May 19, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Posted by: lisa | May 19, 2008 10:36:41 PM
Got it Lisa. Believe me, plenty of liberals attack me on that for supporting McCain if Hillary is not the nominee. But, I can’t vote on a single issue. There’s much more at stake than the abortion issue. I think the SC would never make abortion illegal. It would set us back to the middle ages. I think that’s just a liberal scare tactic.
Posted by: bluebird | May 19, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
THE ONLY REASONs B O has gotten as far as he has is because of the blindsided power of the press which has pushed for him like projectile vomit, and the broken values of the D N C.
Our votes are up for sale! Their purchase is bought to the delegate for whom the highest bidder… is the highest bidder.
What a Democratic way to vote!
Listen to the laughter emanating from all the monarchies and oligarchies and dictatorships of the world as they look up to us leaders of democracy!
Here is someone who will vote for
H I L L A R Y.
SHOULD THAT OPTION BE STOLEN FROM ME
I will vote for MCcain.
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: QUESTIONER | May 19, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
bluebird, I am not even talking about abortion. Are you misreading my posts. I am talking about the Supreme Court in general. Vote Mcain if you want but I never will vote for a republican, not with this economy. And he just wants to continue the Bush plan. How is this going to help me. The dems have the policies that I want and will vote dem no matter what.
Posted by: lisa | May 19, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
obama has won nothing, zero nada zilch , since the rev. wright you can ount ncarolina if
you want, but with only 26% of the white vote, obama proves he’s doa in the ge…
bo smells like dukakis kerry and gore – loser democrats… bo can’t win since rev wright
Posted by: g | May 19, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Posted by: lisa | May 19, 2008 10:50:35 PM
There is lot to the SJC nomination process. Plenty of hearings etc. It’s not easy, especially with a democratic congress. Conservative presidents have been wrong before, I think Senior Bush appointed a justice thinking he was conservative, but it turned out the opposite was true. You know, the justices talk. They don’t decide blindly.
If Obama get the nomination, more power to him. He just doesn’t measure up next to McCain. And my vote, this election, will be for an able leader. This is not the time to take a chance. I appreciate your opinion though and will keep it in mind.
Posted by: bluebird | May 19, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
questioner, no, I think people in this country are tired of the Bush, Clintons dynasties. And don’t blame Obama’s popularity on the press. Half the country has voted for him because we are tired of these 2 dynasties.
Posted by: erin | May 19, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Obama cannot unite our party. He has no chance to win the electoral map in November. Funny the longer this goes on the less people seem smitten by him. Perhaps there is no substance.
Posted by: Jim | May 19, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
I love how the presumption is that either Democrat “will give McCain the most trouble”. The truth is, EITHER one will destroy him in a landslide. I simply want to know why Karl Rove, who ALWAYS has an ulterior agenda, is so set on pitching Hillary as the stronger of the two versus McCain. He knows what will happen in an Obama – McCain matchup…and it won’t be pretty for the Q-Tip.
Posted by: yes1fan | May 19, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Clinton 16,691,639 Votes – Obama 16,648,060 votes= 43,579 more for Clinton.
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
The DNC is selling what they call a 50 state strategy. So far Hillary clinton is the only one visiting all of the states. Either she has worked her butt off or bill or chelsea have been to the state. Either way, Hillary hasn’t “quit” like Obama has. Hillary Clinton went into black neighborhoods. Despite the odds in NC and Mississippi she still tried. Obama quit trying in Kentucky and West Virginia. Who do you want for a president? The one who fights, or the one who quits?
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
John Mccain is going to portray Obama as a quitter. He’ll say Obama wwants to quit in Iraq before the job is done. And he’ll make a reference to KY and WV. He’ll make sure those people don’t forget how Obama didn’t stick with them. He’ll be sure to remind them, in some way, how Obama gave up on the white vote when he didn’t think he needed it anymore.
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Erin, what are you scared of about social security? Bush has been president for 8 years and has he changed it yet? NO HE HASN’T. Has Roe vs Wade been overturned? NO IT HASN’T. The democrats only took over the house and senate about a year and a half ago. That left the republicans plenty of time to do whatever they wanted. They could care less about those issues. Those are just red herrings to bigger issues for them to slip past. While stupid far left liberals are busy playing with a ball of yarn the mosue is sneaking out the bask door. Obama will fall for it too. That is what experience counts for.
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Hmm, maybe because there is no more money for social security, it’s running out. I won’t receive it when I retire. You bet I’m scared.
Posted by: erin | May 19, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Obama will “believe” because he is a sucker. When he has a position of power and is told one thing and given another we’ll see just how wise he is about defeating real politics. The republican machine is not stupid. They managed to get Bush elected twice. A bunch of stupid people could not do that. If it was all part of Karl Roves plan to get Clinton nominated Obama would already be history. If anything I think they are using reverse psucholgoy to make the far left think Obama is tougher fight for Mccain. Remember how they used Bin Laden against Kerry. They said Bin Laden didn’t like Bush. That makes Americans defensive. Kinda like Hamas liking Obama. That makes the far left think they have a real chance at a peace maker. The way I see it, Jimmy Carter just returned from Hamas and the war in Iraq isn’t over yet. So Obamas cr*p isn’t going to do any better. If the republicans want you to think it will though, just so they can bash him down in the general, then it is really MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
It was Obamas fault he wasn’t on the ballot. Again, that is why experience matters. an experienced leader wouldn’t have taken their name off of the ballot. That was just stupid on his part.
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
America’s free press is only free to Obama.
We are treated to everything about him (except the truth) from the sounds of his two-faced speechifying on his Pastor Wright and wrong, to his very fart….. the sound heard round the world!
If I sound perturbed, you are perceptive.
It is like a blackout blanket has been thrown over anything accountable done by Hillary!
Between the DNC which puts its delegates up for sale, thus selling our votes to the highest bidder, and the (HAH!) free press, which predicated this travesty in favor of B O early on and just keeps running in the same direction without any thought or meaning, like a dog chasing it’s shadow as the sun goes down, only one candidate is being treated democratically.
There was a blog started last Thursday and lasting through yesterday about how perturbed women (and some men were regarding the sexist conduct unbefitting a candidate with which B O addresses professional women and “typical” women as well.
It was here at Political Punch and there were well over 1,000 posters. I was one but there are SOOO many more who felt/feel the same way about B O, beginning with his sanctimoniousness , unpreparedness and untrustworthiness and leading to the topic of how sexism equates with racism which, of course, is a no-no word.
It is criminal that our votes can be sold to the highest bidder.
It is a shame that the free press has lost it’s objectivity and is available only to ONE candidate.
It is unbelievable that you find it acceptable for two statesful of citizens to be stripped of their right to select the nominee of their choice.
The DNC and our free press no longer have anything to do with Democracy.
Should Hillary not be given the right to fairly complete this election because of the press’s blackout and the DNC’s continued sale of delegates….. November will find us with another Republican President!
Don’t test us; our country comes before the party!
Posted by: questioner | May 19, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
First, nobody made Obama take his name off of the ballot. Edwards, Dodd and Clitnon all left their names on the ballot. Obama is an idiot. If he had experience he would have known to leave it on the ballot and maybe he would have won by now……….. Second, I PAY SOCIAL SECURITY OUT OF MY PAYCHECK EVERY TWO WEEKS. SO DO MILIONS OF AMERICANS. Social Security is fine. Besides, even if it is privitized, Bush only wanted a partial privitization. Which would have allowed contributors to elect where the money was invested. That is kinda like a 401K plan. By doing this it would have created a numorous amount of wealth for the private sector and your retirement would be worth more than the whopping $600 a month most people get. But it doesn’t matter because it is never going to happen anyway. Thjat ship has already sailed.
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
I’m pretty familar with Karl Rove. He’s kind of a legend here in Texas. I can’t stand Bush and never voted for him.
The fact remains that Rove is a pretty good political analyst dating all the way back to Bush I….There is no scientific way to know exactly who will win an election, but on a state by state asis you can get some idea of who’s ahead. An averaging of polls rather than specific polls have been pretty good signposts in this election.
When Obama’s electability has been questioned it was never about race…It was about votes and the electoroal college.
McGovern, Dukakis and later Carter trying for a second term were examples of grassroots primaries that didn’t translate into electoral college victories. I understand that the media is caught up in the story, but they need to realize that so far the huge Obama crowds have not resulted in a significant amount of votes over Clinton.
If nothing else happens in this election Democrats must go to a winner take all primary system. That’s how you pick the strongest candidate.
Posted by: Jackie | May 19, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
I think that Obama and Rove have the same maps….that would explain Obama’s current campaign appearances.
Posted by: Jackie | May 19, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
I think the youth turnout for Obama will weaken in the fall. A big reason I credit his energy now is just spring fever for teenagers. When school starts back and they can’t be interns all fall because of heavy class loads I think a lot will change. Plus people will start to focus energy on things like football, thanksgiving and christmas. Especially the higher paid people and the kids from those families. I think if the democrats really want a solid base it always in the parties best interest to attract those who work for their living. Clinton already is a name brand product in those housholds. Obama is already an elitist in them. Lets get Clinton in there before it is too late.
Posted by: Kelly | May 19, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Yeah right. Karl Rove – you wish.
Obama 2008
Posted by: Deborah | May 20, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
I’m not sure how old you are, but I am old enough to have marched in the 1960′s for civil rights. I have always been strongly opposed to racism, in any form. Before Obama came on the scene, I had no knowledge of his religion, black liberation theology. When I first heard about it, I decided to research the issue (research is a large part of the profession I am in). What I found out disturbed me greatly. Rev. Wright, who Obama has acknowledged as his “mentor and spiritual adviser” for 20 years, preaches black liberation theology. Rev. Wright also acknowledges that his theological mentor is James H. Cone (both of these admissions are on the church’s website. I obtained several of the most well-known books by James H. Cone, and read them. Once I did, I saw the rants of Rev. Wright in a different light. These rants were not the exception to the rule, in Obama’s church, they were consistent with the racist theology to which Rev. Wright and Obama subscribe. Here are just a few quotes from Cone’s books, and you can be the judge as to whether or not you consider them to be disturbing. ******* (1) “To be Christian is to be one of those whom God has chosen. God has chosen black people.” (2) “While it is true that blacks do hate whites, black hatred is not racism.” (3) “All white men are responsible for white oppression.” (4) “Theologically, Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man “the devil.” (5) “If there is any contemporary meaning of the Antichrist, the white church seems to be a manifestation of it.” (6) “Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.” *****
Here is an excerpt from the Southern Poverty Law Center website about Active U.S. Black Separatist Hate Groups: “Black separatists typically oppose integration and racial intermarriage, and they want separate institutions — or even a separate nation — for blacks. Most forms of black separatism are strongly anti-white and anti-Semitic, and a number of religious versions assert that blacks — not Jews — are the Biblical “chosen people” of God.” ******
Does this remind anyone of Rev. Wright’s depiction of the “black Jesus” who is murdered by “the white man?” ******
It is axiomatic that if I had attended a white racist church for 20 years, and considered its white racist pastor to be my “mentor and spiritual adviser,” it would not be unreasonable to assume that I am a racist. Likewise, if one attends a racist black liberation theology church for 20 years, like Obama did, it is not unreasonable to assume that he is a racist.
Posted by: Truth | May 20, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
If Obama gets the DP nomination he will capitulate in general election…
Democratic party is excluding Clinton supporters like me from the process. It is no way I will forget that few months later. Any family & friend I know feels that way…
That Party needs an expensive lesson…
Posted by: ARBEN Camaj | May 20, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
‘Come on Bill, NU,
Those 100,000 people at the “Elton John” concert weren’t there to see Hillary pal…”"
that happened to be a fund raiser for Hillary….. ;-)
GIVE ‘EM HELL, HILLARY!!!
Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | May 20, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
The commentator on PBS said those states which Obama won are Democrat states but Hillary won Dems and Rep states.
It means Hillary is a better candidate to beat McCain.
what’s DNC thinking?
Posted by: catleya | May 20, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
If it is so obvious that Clinton would win in the general election and Obama wouldn’t, why does Rush Limbaugh call for Republicans to vote for Clinton in the general election. Wouldn’t he want to face the weaker candidate?
Posted by: Gaberp | May 20, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
The myth of Karl Rove’s incredible electoral intelligence is seriously overstated – as is the myth of his sudden nonpartisanship.
Posted by: credulous | May 20, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Obama is going to lose badly to McCain.
My bet is these predicitons do not take into acocunt the mass exodus of Moderate Democrats either.
Posted by: Brian | May 20, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
Gaberp said: If it is so obvious that Clinton would win in the general election and Obama wouldn’t, why does Rush Limbaugh call for Republicans to vote for Clinton in the general election. Wouldn’t he want to face the weaker candidate?
_____________________________________
Because Obama is ahead, and Limbaugh wanted to prolong the bleeding.
Posted by: James | May 20, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
Interesting Rove’s analysis. I had Rove stereotyped until quite recently as a sinister and manipulative figure behind the scenes orchestrator of Geo. Bush’s re-election. And he may still be all of the above.
However, his “genius” when it comes to political analysis is undeniable. Hillary does have the electoral map and even if one were to only exclude the “caucus system” in determining the winner of delegates, the whole picture would be a lot different. Much of Obama’s delegate lead and popular vote have come from “caucus states” and many of those “caucus” states are traditional “red” states that will never vote for any democrat come November.
I live in one of those “red”, “caucus” states – Kansas – which will be voting for McCain, come November. The last time Kansans chose a democratic nominee for president was 1964 and that was a “sympathy vote” because JFK was assassinated in 1963.
Hillary – on the other hand has won most of the “big blue” states that any democratic nominee must carry and she has done well in many “swing states” that a democratic candidate will need in their column.
For those who think Obama is going to turn all those “traditional red” states “blue”, I would say prior to revelations about Rev. Wright, Rezko, Ayers, etc., Obama’s own “bitter” comments, his wife’s divisive and nasty comments, there was a chance. Now that chance has evaporated.
As for me, I’m no republican. I’ve been a life-long democrat and have always voted democrat since I was old enough to vote. I’m now 60 years old. However this year, if Obama gets the dem. nomination, it might be the first time in my life I vote republican.
The DNC and the Obama campaign think they can bring around Hillary supporters because they say so. How ridiculous! Clinton, her family, her supporters are “savaged” by Obama advisers, supporters, and many in the MSM and then we are just supposed to overlook that this has happened. (Never mind the suppression of votes in Michigan and Florida. Don’t think for a moment that voters from those 2 states are going to buy the “party line” about breaking the DNC rules come November if Obama gets the nomination without their votes being fairly counted.)
But I still believe Hillary Clinton is the best person to lead this country and she will prevail because the democratic primary voters are saying over and over again that she is “the one they have been waiting for.”
Posted by: Cathy in Ks. | May 20, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
Hillary will win Florida, Ohio and West Virginia if she runs against McCain. McCain will win them if he runs against Obama. Any sensible person should be wondering what Obama is saying when he says we will have to give up our SUV’s, not eat the food we want and adjust our thermostats BECAUSE we are only 3% of the world’s population using 25% of the world’s energy. What is he saying when he says Iran,Venezuela and Cuba are small countries and don’t pose the threats that Soviet Union did in the 60′s. Duh!! Terrorists with nuclear arms !!??? Wake up Obama your dream is over.
Posted by: mpwdc | May 20, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am
The last thing a scoundrel can do for his party that desperately needs to lose for its own sake and that of the country is mock up some bogus analysis and pretend Clinton is stronger against McCain so that the GOP can coalesce and continue its ill-fated alliance with the Christian Right. This man has no credibility. The emperor has no clothes.
Posted by: Reed | May 20, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
I didn’t need Rove’s consulting firm to tell me this. I have known all along that Hillary was a much stronger candidate than Obama, and I’m sure the Republicans have known all along.
Why do you think Rove was offering Obama advice on how to win the nomination? And then a few weeks afterwards when the news media had “crowned” Obama, Rove was on the news again criticizing Obama’s bitter comments and making fun of him.
Come on…..is it really that hard to see who the Republicans want to go up against and who they think is weaker?
Posted by: Henry | May 20, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am
Hillary Clinton quoting Karl Rove to support her candidacy! What a hoot! She’s REALLY running on empty!
Posted by: Tom in California | May 20, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am
Hillary supporters,
OF COURSE ROVE WANTS CLINTON!!!
People these are the Republicans, what do you think they are going to say?? We want to run against Obama, knowing he is going to crush McCain??
The Republicans know Hillary has such high negatives and with all the baggage and the SNIPER FIRE (and other lies), they can beat her with their eyes closed!!
Who had a rally in Oregon with 75,000 people in attendance yesterday?
Who had a rally in somebody’s backyard in Kentucky yesterday begging for money?
If Hillary runs against McCain it will give the Republicans a chance to “pivot” and change this to a race about integrity. Then the “Sniper fire” videos and all the Clinton’s other lies will run in a continuous loop in October – they won’t even need a October surprise!
PLEASE LOOK AT WHERE THIS “ROVE MAP” IS COMING FROM AND GIVE ME A BREAK!!
Let it go and put the same amount of effort into getting the Democrat elected that you do backing this losing candidate! It’s over for Hillary….
Obama 08!
Posted by: Davis | May 20, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am
Rove is a McCain advisor. I wonder how accurate these numbers are? I think somebody is betting on his dog in the fight. McCain? Can you say dis-information project?
Posted by: Also US Vet | May 20, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Also US Vet,
You are absolutely right, this is a total dis-information campaign by Rove and the Republicans…
Good luck getting any of Hillary’s rabid supporters to agree though. All I can say is Hillary must brew up some strong Koolaid!!
I know if the shoe was on the other foot (Hillary was actually winning on someplace other than Planet Clinton) then most Obama would probably back her over McBush.
However, these people are completely unreasonable. They lie, make up all kinds of crazy theories and “delusional facts” of how she can still win. And when that doesn’t work they just beat their heads against the wall, until they are brain dead for her!
That witch must cast a powerful spell, that is all I have to say! Oh yes one more thing, it is time for her to get on her broom and fly away!!!
Posted by: Davis | May 20, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am
And we all believe Karl Rove. Don’t we? Lol.
Posted by: DennisNC | May 20, 2008, 5:20 am 5:20 am
Karl Rove would never try to mislead us, would he?
Posted by: DennisNC | May 20, 2008, 5:23 am 5:23 am
The Republicans don’t know how to do anything but question patriotism, even though they’re a party of draft dodgers and their record is one of complete destructiveness toward America. They KNOW they have nothing to run on except smears and phony issues, For the last 14 years of ruling Congress and 8 years of ruling the White House they have ruined the country in many ways. And now the dirt has hit the fan and they have nothing to run on. So the McCain plan of attack is to make Obama look like an Arab-Islamist sympathizer and an appeaser of terrorist groups. You can bet we have seen only a small foreshadowing of how big this smear campaign is going to become.
But, in these hard times for America.instead of putting us back on track as they should, what do they do? They launch diversionary attacks laced with low-down slander.
On the contrary, it is Republicans who SHOULD be held accountable for their essential lack of patriotism and their gross dishonesty. In the end, their leaders have to be judged for inheriting the world’s only superpower — economically, militarily and morally — and making a disastrous mess of things with their abuse of power. What did Ronald Reagan used to ask? “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” How about eight years ago?
The fact is: Republicans deserve to lose. And they may have another think coming if they try to defeat Democrats by substituting scurrilous slander as a way to get voters to forget their super-failures. This overly self-congratulatory, arrogant GOP party fails to understand the deep-seated ANGER AND ANTIPATHY of a vast majority of average eople toward their bad President, his war, the high gas prices, the bad economy, foreclosures and roadblocking of reasonable reforms. The GOP if it were smart, would ‘cut the crap’ and ‘burn the Bush’…that is, if they want to avoid a bloodbath in November, but they appear to be too blind and stupid to do that.. They deserve to lose, and I hope they do.
Posted by: JL | May 20, 2008, 5:55 am 5:55 am
If anyone is electable, they should first of all win the primaries to prove their electability.
How could you lose the qualifying series and argue that you will be the best in the finals.
Many people have lost their commonsense to sentiment!!!
Posted by: Geldo | May 20, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
Anyone who gives credance to anything Rove says is making a mistake. The credibility ABC gives Rove reflects on the credibility of ABC.
Posted by: riddelup | May 20, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
I can’t stand Rove but, he is a good political strategist. The radical leftist will never concede to needing the moderates in this election and that will be their downfall. Obama has so disinfranchised the moderates of the democratic party that even if only some of them don’t vote or go McCain, that will be enough to swing states during the general.
Hillary is correct when she says she will win more electoral votes in the states she has won, the numbers don’t lie. Those same states that Obama lost, if even he loses only 20% of those votes that will be enough to swing the state.
The leftist democrats have thrown the baby out with the bath water and refuse to see the bigger picture for nov. This is all because they want change and “they want it now”. Any political change within a party takes time but, the younger voters will have to learn the hard way and that is the inexperience of Obama.
If you just can’t vote for Obama, GO INDEPENDENT!
Posted by: Average Joe | May 20, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am
Obama is the better candidate for the democrats since he won the most delegates and popular vote unless you consider Hillary’s fuzzy math of giving Obama no votes in Michigan and caucus states. The only way she can win would be for the superdelegates to overrule the voice of the people. But then many Obama supporters would stay home and she would have less of a chance of winning than Obama. Hillary may have been the better choice if the electorate chose her, but they didn’t and its too late.
Posted by: Steve Courton | May 20, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am
The electoral college is EXACTLY what the voters and super delegates need to be looking at. Obama may win the democratic nomination but it means absolutely nothing to our party and position on the issues if he CAN’T win the general election. He is a flawed candidate and the democratics will be taking a huge risk with him as our candidate. It’s time to sit down and objectively select the candidate and ticket that will win the White House. Hillary has the much better shot looking at candidates one on one. But, an Obama/Hillary ticket would also seal the deal.
Posted by: JD, Pittsburgh, PA | May 20, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
To the poster who said, ‘you may not like Rove, but he is a political genius’. Yeah, right. Look at the results of the 2006 election that he directed. He lost control of the both the House and Senate. Rove has been exposed and he is a loser.
Posted by: PhilBgood | May 20, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
What’s with all this “Hillary would win in the GE?” Puh-leeze, this is the EXACT logic the Clinton campaign had when they thought Obama was a non-issue. Sure, put her on the ticket and watch every republican who got nauseous over Clinton 1.0 come of the woodwork to vote against her.
I’m voting for whichever democratic nominee is on the ticket. And I suspect anyone who considers McCain’s “projected” 2013 pull-out will do the same. That or buy stock in body bags.
Posted by: Megan | May 20, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
i think the reason sen. clinton is the stronger against mccain is because she is the smarter of the three on the issues.
sen. clinton CAN articulate the difference in how the dem. will take the country in the better direction than mccain and co. obama CANNOT do that.
obama cannot talk without a prepared
speech.
if sen. clinton is not at the top of the dem party ticket,
the only people to blame for whatever a mccain presidency brings are the democratic party leaders.
Posted by: jgaw | May 20, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
It’s pretty sad that the Republicans are pointing out to the nation what the Superdelegates are failing to see! This entire nominating process has been a sham and the media should have kept their noses out of it. We should go back to the days of campaigning on trains and in the back of pickup trucks. The media only gets to report the results after the polls close without 2 weeks of analysis and speculation as to what “might” happen. Let the voters decide who gets to be President.
Posted by: Darla | May 20, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
IT IS A FACT she is, not a tactic, reality. Why should we nominate a straw man who will be knocked down. Then, we have only ONE CHOICE.
NO OBAMA.
Posted by: mj | May 20, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Hillary leads the popular vote, yet some Democrats call us “delusional” I’m sorry, but aren’t you the same folks who bayed at Bush in 00 and 04 about who won the popular vote.
Democrats are supposed to be leaders who respect the rank and file…The Obama folks seem much more content with the party elite…Good luck with that!
Posted by: shawn | May 20, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
IT IS A FACT she is, not a tactic, reality. Why should we nominate a straw man who will be knocked down. Then, we have only ONE CHOICE.
NO OBAMA.
Posted by: mj | May 20, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
IT IS A FACT she is, not a tactic, reality. Why should we nominate a straw man who will be knocked down. Then, we have only ONE CHOICE.
NO OBAMA.
Posted by: mj | May 20, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
The saddest part about this election is that the media and many in this country got on the emotional Obama wave and it derailed Hillary Clinton, the only real chance we had at retaking the White House. I’m an African American and I don’t believe Obama will be elected for one minute! He’s inexperienced, has no substance and is too soft. We just gave the nomination back to the Republicans, because when the WHOLE, ENTIRE country gets ready to decide and sees Obama they will see a black man. When they see McCain they will see a white man…Who do you think the country is going to choose?
….food for thought
Posted by: Eric | May 20, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Some seem to think Democrats should believe Karl Rove, really? This is the same guy whose magical maps said the Republicans would hold onto Congress in ’06 after he said Bush would be declared victorious over Gore before 10 pm election day (he was just a few months off). This is also Obama’s lowest point since he is being attacked by Hillary and the Republicans while the Republicans give Hillary a pass and preconvention general election polls are not to be trusted (ask Dukakis). If I hear another person talk about counting the Michigan straw poll, my head will explode.
Posted by: Really | May 20, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
McCain may not live until November and most certainly won’t receive the convention bounce Obama will see.
Posted by: BS | May 20, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
I know one thing and that is Obama is
not going to win in GE. His experience leaves alot to be desired.
Posted by: Melissa | May 20, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Obama is gonna crush McCain in the general and Rove knows it. The only hope he has is to promote as much as possible a split in the Democratic Party that lingers into November. Which is why we see so many republicans posing as democrats on the internet spewing division and misinformation. Ain’t gonna work this time, but hey evil is as evil does so I guess you got to fulfill your nature, right?
PS US Vet: counties with military bases have voted overwhelmingly for Obama. I think yer out of step with your fellow vets.
Posted by: Northern Observer | May 20, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Obama has developed a strategy to con Hillary supporters into voting for him using various ploys, including: 1. The “Supreme Court” card, i.e. if Obama doesn’t win, McCain will appoint conservative judges. 2. The “Roe v. Wade” card, i.e. if Obama doesn’t win, the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade. 3. The “race card,”, i.e. if you are against Obama, then you are a racist. 4. The “real Democrat” card, i.e. “real Democrats” will vote for the Democratic nominee whether they like him or not. 5. The “Hillary would want you to vote for Obama” card, which is self-explanatory.
Obama, his supporters, the DNC, the party elite, and the mainstream media have conspired to marginalize the millions of Democrats who have voted for Hillary, and they will now be using every trick in the book to “bring the party together” to further their ruthless ambitions. They will want you to forget all about the months of biased press, the biased party elite, the insults, and the race-cards. They will want you to forget that the Democratic Party now is the party that stands for disenfranchisement and the rationalization of racism. They will use any method to persuade you to vote for the man who they have preordained as the Democratic nominee. DON’T FALL FOR IT!
Whether you write-in Hillary, if possible, vote for John McCain, or sit out the election, remember that your action or inaction could result in the election of the inexperienced, deceptive, ruthless and divisive Obama.
Posted by: James | May 20, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
SO MANNY OF YOU KEEP FORGETING, HOW MANNY PEOPLE THAT VOTED FOR BHO,HAVE REMORSE AFTER FINDING OUT WHAT HE IS! THAT MEANS THEY WILL NOT VOTE FOR HIM IN THE GE! NO MATTER WHAT,GO HRC OR INDEPENDANT 08
Posted by: RELD1127 | May 20, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
the Republicans are disappointed that Hillary will not be the nominee. Rove is trying to spin. They know that nothing would have got their dispirated base more motivated that going to the polls to vote against her in the GE. Ha Obama will crush McCain!
Posted by: AndyM | May 20, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Maybe it is time to split off and form a really viable 3rd party with Hillary Clinton as our candidate. With her solid numbers plus the moderate Republican vote she might put together a coalition similar to Ronald Regan. I for one am really having a hard time supporting the ultra left DNC and the ultra right RNC. We need a REAL 3rd party. Come on people! GO HILLARY!!!
Posted by: NavyHeloMom | May 20, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
SHOULD DEMS EVER BELIEVE KARL ROVE?????
Posted by: Marilyn | May 20, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Either of the Democrats should be able to see off John ‘More of the FAILED Same’ McCain.
I’m a Blue Dog and I’ll be doing whatever I can to make sure that the failed reactionary party of American politics will not win by their usual tricks of smear and fear.
Sen. Obama is a pragmatic progressive, not a radical leftist. Furthermore, the rantings of Rev. Wright are not reflective of Obama’s views on anything. Nor can Obama be blamed for receiving unwanted and unsought ‘endorsements’.
Given how close the two Democrats are on the issues, there is no reason why supporters of the losing candidate shouldn’t support the party’s presidential nominee.
Sen. Obama has had the kitchen sink thrown at him in recent weeks and he has responded with grace, candor and dignity.
Posted by: David | May 20, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
David said: Furthermore, the rantings of Rev. Wright are not reflective of Obama’s views on anything.
YOU CAN’T BE SERIOUS! OBAMA CHOSE TO ATTEND A BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY CHURCH FOR 20 YEARS, AND CHOSE TO HAVE A VERY CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH ITS RACIST AND ANTI-AMERICAN PASTOR. FOR YOUR EDIFICATION, HERE IS A DESCRIPTION OF BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY WRITTEN BY ONE OF ITS FOUNDERS, JAMES H. CONE:
“Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.
DAVID: I’m sure if Hillary Clinton had attended a white racist church which had the same theology as that described above, you would be giving her the same free pass you seem so compelled to give Obama, right?
Posted by: Obvious Guy | May 20, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
To All Hillary supporters,
The DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee is meeting on May 31 to make a decision about Florida and Michigan. Send a message to the DNC telling them to count the votes and seat Florida and Michigan’s delegates.
Please help to spread this message to everyone you know. Thanks
Posted by: Christina | May 20, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Go Hillary, Be Independent and we will back you 100%. Don’t let the biased media and Osama’s supporters pull you down. Obama will have no chance WHATSOEVER if you are Independent!
Posted by: Christina | May 20, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Dear Fellow Democrats. Regardless of who the Democratic nominee will be, WE MUST UNITE. The next president will make very important choices. Obama and Hillary are inches apart; but they are both miles apart from McCain. THE NEXT PRESIDENT COULD APPOINT AS MANY AS THREE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES. These are appointments for LIFE, and they will radically affect us. The Supreme Court is who has given us women rights and who has given Blacks rights (as well as allowing us freedom of choice and basic civil rights). If you do not believe me, find out for yourself what these new appointments will mean to you. Please do not get mad if your candidate does not win. Instead, think. Think about what your vote will mean to you, your children, each other, and the planet. VOTE DEMOCRATIC. We cannot withstand another four years with McBush!
Posted by: Marilyn | May 20, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Dear Fellow Democrats. Regardless of who the Democratic nominee will be, WE MUST UNITE. The next president will make very important choices. Obama and Hillary are inches apart; but they are both miles apart from McCain. THE NEXT PRESIDENT COULD APPOINT AS MANY AS THREE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES. These are appointments for LIFE, and they will radically affect us. The Supreme Court is who has given us women rights and who has given Blacks rights (as well as allowing us freedom of choice and basic civil rights). If you do not believe me, find out for yourself what these new appointments will mean to you. Please do not get mad if your candidate does not win. Instead, think. Think about what your vote will mean to you, your children, each other, and the planet. VOTE DEMOCRATIC. We cannot withstand another four years with McBush!
Posted by: Marilyn | May 20, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
I can not afford another McBush…I simply CAN NOT. McCain is not only continuing Bush’s policy, but he is got anger problem. I am afraid he might use nuclear bomb, he is got soft skin. People who work with him know this fact! I cannot let angry person in the white house.
Posted by: John Elias | May 20, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Is there any reason why Democrats should put any stock in anything from Karl Rove? I sure can’t think of one.
Posted by: Kenneth Fair | May 20, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Karl Rove is the last advisor the Democratic Party would want. Anything he says, believe the opposite.
Posted by: lisa | May 20, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
LATEST SUFFOLK POLL OUT OF OREGON TODAY: Obama’s lead drops from double digits to 45% to 41%. Kentucky looks to be a blow out for Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: Patriot | May 20, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
I knew it had to be Rove that’s been egging Hillary on; talk about dirty tacts why else would she win certain areas that are Republican dominated according to certain study groups; sure isn’t independents, and what about the tracking polls (people say anything and everything against what they do, I know of some in New Hampshire –Lindbaugh’s law of confusion and Roves tactics just may come back and bite them — especially noticeable in Pa, where you could vote and then change back to Republican all at the same time.
Wonder what happens when all these Republicans who voted democratic in the primary decide to stick with the winners and give Obama the vote!! Yes, He Can!!
Posted by: Paulet | May 20, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Obama won Wisconsin by nearly 200,000 votes. 58% to 42%. He won every age group on almost every country.
Yet Rove wants us to assume Wisconsin will go to McCain.
Posted by: Mr. Unite Us | May 20, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
So…if McCain wins the GE, he will have a heavily Dem congress to work with. With a Dem quorum, he’ll have to “cross the aisle.” He’s not averse to that anyway.
If Hillary heads the Dem ballot in the GE, I vote for her. That would ensure practical changes as quick as possible and the restoration and advancement of the programs and issues I care about. Best option.
If the Dems don’t have the brains and foresight to run with her, then why should I not go with McCain? The prospect of such a junior politician as NObama handed that much power on a plate is far scarier than his JM’s temper.
Posted by: indy in MD | May 20, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
This is what makes this country so sad and short of being the great country it could be…
(1) Karl Rove is a repub (Bush gangmember)
(2) Obama is not Muslim he is Christian but why should that matter, Bush is an atheist, what does a person religion has to do with it as long as he or she believes in GOD and have this country’s best interest at heart
(3) Obama speaks of having a dialogue with this country’s enemies, what is so wrong with that if peace can be achieved and accomplished and the saving of lives on all sides, that is an act of a man of GOD, why must the USA always choose to use violence to meet its goal of peace without ever considering discussion or exchange of ideas or channel of communication or conversation or dialogue
(4) Some view Obama as a black candidate; remember his mother is white, Obama is both black and white, but many in this country fail to accept this because they are short minded and are affected by the color of a persons skin verse that person character, why would a person skin color makes the difference for a person to serve this country if they have a chance to bring it back into the fold that represent high morals and value, peace and democracy for the world to see and follow
(5) Many excuses are being made to hide the racism in this country, excuses of tides with the reverend Wright (what of Jerry Farwell, Pat Buchannan, reverend Hagen), excuses of his name Baraka Hussein Obama, excuse of having no experience in the White House (Most Presidents didn’t either; Hillary doesn’t have any she was the wife not the President or VP), etc.
(6) Why not elect a person who is Black, White, Red, Brown, Muslim, Jewish, Catholic, Hispanic, Oriental, or even female, what ever; this country is a mix of all people from around the world that is what is so special and how this country has the potential to be so great, but to vote because someone doesn’t look like you is stupid and dumb. This is why this country has so many problems (racism, sexism, all the –ism ever thought of)
Many not all who are expecting to vote against Obama is doing so not because of any difference in policies or programs but because of the -ism that is like a cancer in this country, but they will deny it.
All that is asked is let’s find peace and prosperity and harmony together. Let’s start voting for the best person be it man or woman, black or white, republican or democrat or green party or independent, Christian or Muslim or Judean, and not because of any hang-ups.
Let’s start a new revolution of peace by moving away from the old ways of politics and take control of our government not have them continue to control US…
Posted by: PBOARD | May 20, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Anybody who looks at this( legitimate) data, notices what many of us have intuitively sensed, that as the racial and gender-based polarization of this race has heightened, Appalachian and Rust Belt whites have run from Obama, probably because of the patriotism/Wright questions, and older white women have continued to flock to Hillary, because she’s an older white woman whith a legitimate shot at the presidency; note the difference in anti-Obama versus pro-Hillary motivations. The reason her numbers have shot up in Florida and Ohio is that those two aforementioned groups of voters who have shifted, who were previously 1) mostly McCain supporters (whites) or 2) mostly undecided (women) since March are now saying that they’ll vote for Hillary in November, but will continue to be undecided or for McCain if it’s McCain vs. Obama. The question I have is, how many of those whitesd who were previously McCain supporters but are now “pro-Hillary” will go back to McCain if Hillary were to win the nomination? If that were to happen, say goodbye to Ohio and West Virginia, Hillary supporters. And she never had a chance in Colorado or North Dakota or Virginia or Iowa, so she doesn’t have anything to fall back on if she loses Ohio or Michigan, unlike Obama.
Posted by: AR | May 20, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
*Connecticut* a swing state? CT’s gonna go for Obama OR CLinton by at least 10. Same with NH, particularly w/ Jean Shaheen campaigining. Iowa’s also going blue, as is New Mexico w/ the Hispanic vote and Richardson campaigning for either candidate. And anyone claiming McCain is going to win Wisconsin is just ridiculous.
But hey, if the Republicans are stupid enough to listen to the guy who lost them 30 House seats and 6 Senate seats, I won’t argue with that.
Posted by: Greg | May 20, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
this country has never had a black president and i believe this scares people, for only a white person has ever set in the white house. what gives white people the right to make decisions for the entire world, as if they are the only ones with any sense. when will everyones vote truly count. why all of the negative remarks about Senator Obama, this man has layed his life on the line for americans just by running for the presidency, why cant white america give him the benefit of the doubt, i believe he would make a great leader. what would surely guarantee the democrats the white house would be Obama/Clinton ticket. They both have had record breaking turnout to vote in these primaries.a lot of people say it wouldnt work,but i say if they truly love america and its people they would make it work
Posted by: Al | May 21, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
Northern Observer said: PS US Vet: counties with military bases have voted overwhelmingly for Obama. I think yer out of step with your fellow vets.
You do realize that most military people vote absentee ballots from their home state, not the state they are based in.
Posted by: Rob | May 21, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Obama has a huge electoral problem, and anyone that thinks he is going to win Virginia (much less NC or Indiana) is nuts. McCain will sweep the south without even trying- not having to bother campaigning in Florida will allow him to concentrate on places like Ohio and Nevada, as well as try to pick off Wisconsin and NM. Obama HAS to play defense in those places (particuarly the West) and then HAS to either sweep them or take Ohio (which McCain has a nice lead in). If Obama takes the advice i see here and tries to go on the offensive by winning in the South, McCain is going to win in a walkover.
Posted by: Mark Buehner | May 21, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Fanatic Hillary supporters= pathetic sore losers= self-destructive idiots= Hillary supporters for McCain.
May you get what you deserve. I feel sorry for your children.
Posted by: stacey | May 21, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Obama’s supporters assume if you’re not in the tank for their guy, it’s because of some latent racist motivation. His race is not the problem. It’s his lack of a record. I’m interested in some demonstrated competence in actually governing. Is that too much to ask? Obama speaks of a “post partisan” and “post racial” future. What’s that mean? Has Obama been a hardworking senator willing to take risks and give others credit to get things accomplished? No. Has he been working on projects and proposals to bridge the racial divide in this country? No. Has he done anything with his time in office other than run for President? No. Those are the reasons I will never support Obama for President. Not because I’m a racist, not because I’m a Republican (I’ve never cast a vote in my life for anyone with an (R) next to their name), and not because I’m just a bitter Hillary supporter. I’m only interested in competence and Obama can’t demonstrate he’s able to competently run the federal government.
Posted by: sgt. lebow | May 21, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
The Rove map says Clinton is leading with 259 electoral votes, however when you add up the individual states on the map, she gets 274. According to the map, Hillary is already over the top.
Posted by: Monica | May 21, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
One major thing to consider re those fence sitters. Will they want a right wing Supreme Court or one that keeps Roe vs. Wade, etc I think when push comes to shove they will realize that they can’t afford having a right wing president make the next 1 – 3 Supreme Court appointments.
Posted by: yes08 | May 23, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
You folks are FINALLY getting it! Hillary is the stronger candidate against John Mccain this Fall. That is why we voted for her and that is why we continue to support her.
Despite the negative image the media has been portraying. We all know and believe Hillary is the best candidate.
Today’s gallup polls 5.28 clearly state this again
Posted by: rlc | May 28, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am