By Nitya

May 7, 2008 2:04pm

Superdelegate Senators Assess ’08 Race

ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf Reports: There is a high-level meeting of 49 superdelegates going on behind closed doors right now.

It’s the weekly party policy luncheon in the US Senate. And while there are a number of important legislative topics on the agenda (the war supplemental, a gas prices control bill, the farm bill and more) you can bet that last night’s returns from Indiana and North Carolina are being discussed as senators queue up in the buffet line.

Going into the lunch, reporters asked senators for their assessments.

On his way to lunch, Sen. Teddy Kennedy, D-Mass, one of Sen. Barack Obama’s, D-Ill., high profile backers said the Democratic nomination seems to belong to the Illinois senator.

"I pay tribute to Senator Clinton. She has been making her case and doing it effectively, but the outcome is very clear as to what’s for the Democratic nomination. It’s effectively Barack Obama’s nomination. Its pretty effectively sewed up and I don’t see any possibility of altering or changing that inevitable fact," Kennedy said.

Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., who was Hillary Clinton’s, D-N.Y., chief backer in Hoosier State said he is operating on fumes after returning to Washington at 4am this morning, admitting that Clinton’s path going forward is treacherous, but he that bringing state voters to the table for yesterday’s primary was worth it.

"Obviously the numbers are what they are, but things can have a way of changing," Bayh said. 

"Some of these voices say that was effectively over had been listened to we wouldn’t have even mattered. Those 1.3 million people that went to the polls yesterday, they wouldn’t have bothered to go vote. And that would have been a shame. It would have been a shame for them, for our state, and I think ultimately for the Democratic party. So I’m just a little reluctant to call for the disenfranchisement of the people in other states," Bayh said.

That is not an argument that works for Sen. Chris Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat who endorsed Obama after folding his own presidential campaign earlier this year.

Dodd pointed out that as the race is moving to West Virginia, a state Democrats may need in the fall. And the primary battle, he said, could confuse voters when Clinton makes the argument to voters they should cast their primary vote against Obama.

"To turn around and ask the very same people a few weeks later to reverse themselves and now vote for him on election day in a state you’ve got to carry as part of that electoral college map. I just don’t see it," Dodd said.

Bayh put one caveat on how the race should continue: respectfully.

"As long as it is a respectable debate and doesn’t become bitter or personal, I don’t think this will be harmful for the Democratic party," Bayh said, speaking to party unity. "There are going to be some temporary hurt feelings. That happens in politics. That happens in life. But I think once people  have a chance to take a deep breath, focus on the stakes of the election, compare our nominee to the other parties nominee, Democrats will come together."

UPDATE: Later in the day Dodd picked up the award for alliterative statement of the day when he predicted Sen. Clinton will bow out to avoid a "Donnybrook in Denver."

But he reiterated that the continued elections could confuse voters down the road.

"You go through a process where you ask somebody to vote against and 20 weeks later you ask them to vote for, that’s a wrinkle in all of this. People are missing the point. Is my colleague likely to do anything that will damage the party? No. She will not allow herself to be an obstruction to a Democratic victory in November. That will not happen."

Dodd spoke at a press conference slamming President Bush for threatening to veto the House foreclosure prevention package, which proposes up to $300 billion to insure troubled mortgages and has the tacit backing of Ben Bernanke, Dodd was also asked about the Presidential election.

He said he has "Tremendous respect for her and her husband" and has faith that "At some point they’ll make that right decision."

"There will not be a donnybrook in Denver," Dodd declared.

He said as a former candidate – though he did not reach the heights or the depths she has –"We should Giving her some space to deal with these issues is where we oughta be."

User Comments

Do what the Demos always do – choose a candidate who will lose in the fall general election. Another typical Democratic presidential nominee.

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 7, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“It should continue as long as it doesn’t become bitter or personal…” Obviously Bayh doesn’t read letters to the editor or blogs. Way too late to worry about civility NOW, Bayh!

Posted by: blog | May 7, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Vanessa – Why should we bet another uncertainty for 4 years, while we have seen what that means in the past 8 years? Why should one blindly rally around someone who has shown not a single original idea of domestic and foreign policies?
At least, one knows what you will get from McCain, who has shown time again to work with Demos. Do you want another 4 years of nothing getting done by the far left and far right and fillbustered congress in BO?
It’s too bad that the Demos did it again, to shoot their own feet.

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 7, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

North Carolina Rep. Heath Shuler is throwing his superdelegate endorsement to Clinton.

Posted by: Jack | May 7, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Olbermann3
the only times the dems lose is when they go for the “old party” candidate…
It’s not about liberal or conservative…it’s about who takes the party in a new direction…and who has just “paid their dues”…
there is enthusiasm with one…tiredness with the other.

Posted by: dl | May 7, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

ted Kennedy…LOL! 1 more reason NOT to vote for Obama. My choice is Hillary, than McCain if he doesnt pick a right wing nut job…or I just won’t vote. Alot of Democrats will not be voting for Obama…simple fact.

Posted by: MaxiDial | May 7, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

true truth
Obama won despite being black not because of it. There are a heck of a lot more white women who wanted their first woman President as much as African Americans wanted the first African American.
Your argument is just sad that you don’t understand that in this day and age.

Posted by: dl | May 7, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

dl,
Maybe.
The only time dems did not lose was Clinton in the past 60 years.

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 7, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Maxidial
That’s fine is you choose McCain but when your daughter or niece or grandchild woner what happened and why roe vs. wade , the war went on, why she lives in a country still beholden to China and without affordable healthcare… and second to several nations in economic and educational opportunity and strength… and a land less safe because of our standing in the world.
You tell them you voted for McCain.

Posted by: dl | May 7, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

I wouldn’t rally around Obama if it meant we never had another president. If the Dems get stuck with him I will vote McCain and get as many other people as I can to do the same thing

Posted by: Vickie | May 7, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

dl,
You are right in that a lot of younger, and whiter men and women voted for BO. When you ask them why you voted for BO? They tell you that they think he is “cool”.
Cool?! Is that what you want as the quality from a pres candidate.

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 7, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Whne your children are paying a Global Poverty Act tax imposed by the United Nations on the citizens of the USA, tell them you voted for Obama. Republican Party has a lot of work ahead of it, but the Democrat Party hasn’t even begun to take a good look at itself and the devastation its policies have had on people. “I’m from teh government, and I’m here to help” lol

Posted by: Kitty | May 7, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Z,
The vote records are the fact how the voters voted based on the skin color or gender..
It is just the fact and nothing else. The question is how Obama can win over white votes and whether he can beat McCain by his own winning patterns..

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Hillary Clinton running a campaign that isn’t bitter and personal? I’ll believe it when I see it. If she can put down the kitchen sink and start running on her own merits, I say, “let her stay in as long as she wants.”

Posted by: na | May 7, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Any Democrat who says if Clinton doesn’t win then they are not voting of voting for McCain is an IDIOT. Their football team mentality is getting in the way of what’s at stake for our nation. The last 8 years have been pure hell for some of us out here in the country so the petty and childishness makes people who say that look like complete fools to the rest of us. If Clinton was the nominee, and its obvious she won’t be now, I’d hold my nose and vote for her because even the chance of a McCain presidency is appalling. Geez..electing someone who can’t tell the difference between a shia and a sunni or doesn’t know that the Soviet Union is defunct is just laughable….can we get any more dissed by the rest of the world than we have with Bush as pres? Well, elect that old phoney and you’ll see we will.

Posted by: Suz in KS | May 7, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

z
Please name a single original policy idea coming out of the mouth or brain of BO who has so inspired you, besides his feeling-good speeches.
Show a single record of accomplishment in the US senate due to he himself, not something handed to him by party elders.
Then, we’d be happy to consider of supporting him.

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 7, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Vanessa – it’s obvious as you have been a contributing member pro-Obama, that you are on his taskforce, and try to sway the blogs on his behalf.
Give it up.
I’m pro-Hillary and voting for McCain in the election.

Posted by: mel | May 7, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Suz in KS
I suppose your BO does not need those idiots votes.

Posted by: fat cat | May 7, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

I am 55 female and Caucasian by birth and race and age and gender do not matter.
Young people realize that.
There should not be concerns about “color” of people nor should states be considered of different “colors.”
It’s just people/places & we’re all the same under God.
Obama is at the right place and time in history.
Let’s make America a place in the world to be proud of again.
Let’s set an example.
Let’s overcome bigotry and divisions, end wedge politics.
Now is our chance.
Let’s end class politics – I am educated but did it on grants & scholarships. I own a house but couldn’t buy one in today’s dollars. My son is unemployed and has no insurance.
I am liberal but it’s nothing new and that’s not a bad word. It means I care about people. Is that bad?
I would be a latte drinker if I could afford it but the middle class is shrinking so class-division politics doesn’t work any more.
We are all hurting under Bush and McCain would be more of the same.
Let’s all get behind Obama.

Posted by: DiAnne | May 7, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

What yesterday proved was that obama will not win in the GE. He loses amoung the working class, latinos, women who are not black. black people makeup only 11% of the population of the US so that is not a winning formula.
SC, NC, AL, TN, GA, MS and LA will all go red for republicans in the GE.
obama cannot win PA, OH, MO, MA, NJ or IN in the GE also.
So what state does he win Il and maybe D.C.
So be prepared to say President McCain for 2009.

Posted by: toby | May 7, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

And for all of you who think African Americans are only voting for Obama because of his skin color, I suggest you check the ratio’s that voted for Clinton, Gore and Kerry. Are all the women who vote for Clinton allegedly idiots as well? I think you’d argue not. Please explain to me why he’s getting the college educated vote. The elitists? You can’t have it all ways. Lick your wounds and then get back to being Democrats…

Posted by: Lauren | May 7, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

DiAnne read your own post… if that’s not the pot calling the kettle black. and most of the obama supporters i know aren’t nasty… there are always a few bad apples (and a few covert republican operatives) out there though. don’t let them spoil a good candidate for you.

Posted by: z | May 7, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

The reason why a lot of Hillary supporters would either stay home or vote for McCain is becuase they don’t like Obama and they don’t think he is qualified to be CIC and they think McCain would be better than Obama…
Obama looks to them not a convincing and capable candidate…
They put the country first instead of so called “Dems” party…
That is why…

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Kennedy? Didn’t he lose in the primary? He’s more of a Clinton loser no?

Posted by: Lauren | May 7, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

I’m NOT voting for Obama. Neither are over 50% of the rest of the democrats. The DNC has to work something out – just telling everyone to play nice doesn’t solve the problem.

Posted by: Griffin | May 7, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

z
Glad to hear your reasoned assessments.
You should realize that BO has surrounded him by people like Rezko, Wright, Ayers, etc. for the past 20 years in Chicago. That’s his circle of advisers, people he gain strength from, people he seeks spiritual and inspirational guidance.
Now, he is surrounded by a group of party losers and far leftists.
However, it is good to see that he has picked up most of HRC’s idea of health care, although he fell short by 15 million.

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 7, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Bayh’s is an “IDIOT”. Nobody can honestly believe the debate will be respectable from this point forward. That suddenly the bad blood will vanish, because he says so. The supers need to get off their collective butts and end this thing. And Bayh needs to shut his damn mouth, he has already said too much.

Posted by: James | May 7, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

olbermann3- consider an event like 9/11… a tragic event, but also a major opportunity to unite this country and greatly improve our standing in the world… as well as rally the world around the cause of getting osama bin laden and al qaede… but bush just asked us to go shopping and otherwise not change our lives, and he got sidetracked from afganahstan with a stupid war in iraq. it’s about what you do once you’re president, not what you propose as a candidate. our founding fathers created a system that means policy changes happen slowly… it’s the drawback and also major benefit of cheques and balances. so the president has to mostly deal with foreign policy and major issues. people are kidding themselves if they think policy from the government really has much of an effect on the economy (unless it is really bad policy like bushes that has driven the dollar way down and driven gas prices way up, and drastically increased economic inequality). so ask me some more relevant and educated questions about why i’m voting for obama and i’ll answer them, but down ask me about his senate record (which is too short for much subtance anyway) or his supposedly stolen and unoriginal policy proposals… none of these candidates can come up with this stuff on their own.

Posted by: z | May 7, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

After reading all of your comments, it is more than time for the Supers to end this. It should have been done after Super Tuesday. This is breaking up the party and it has damaged us.

Posted by: Becky | May 7, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

We will be so confused if there’s an election and won’t know who to vote for?
:rolleyes:

Posted by: porkfrog | May 7, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Kudos to you Frank! Very well said.

Posted by: Dina | May 7, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

There is nothing wrong for 90% AA to vote for Obama. It is people’s right…
However, the fact is undeniable that Obama didn’t win over white votes. Without support from majority of Dems’ white, he may only win the states occupied by majority of AA… So how can he beat McCain in most states where the white is majority???
It is undeniable fact that Obama has offended some whites based on issues he had so how can he unite the Dems’ white behind him??

Posted by: True Truth | May 7, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Wow – Emily – my sentiments exactly.

Posted by: Frank- South Hampton | May 7, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Unless you have benn living under a rock then you would realize the media has been all over Obama. Truth is you have no real reason for not supporting Obama as Hannity said there ain’t a dimes worth of diff between Clinton and Obama on Policy so if you think Obama is a jimmy carter, then you think Hillary is to, the real reason you won’t support the guy who wants the same things that hillary wants is because he is black!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Resp to Frank | May 7, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Outside of what candidate is the best blah blah – I think in the future, IF the primary vote is as important as the party poo-bahs claim it is – then EVERY state should hold their primary/caucus on the same day.
Have a campaign of about 5-6 weeks, then bingo, pick a date, then EVERYONE votes. No one will be influenced by any other state’s vote, no one will be able to claim that they are part of “Rush’s Army”.
Then it will be all over on THAT day, and then the nightmare of a general election can commence….

Posted by: Ugh | May 7, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Anyone that voted for bush/cheney the last 2 elections should do this country a favor and sit this one out. Your total lack of good judgment is not good for the country. Obama 2008!

Posted by: pt | May 7, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

idle, not ideal, sorry, typing faster than my brain

Posted by: z | May 7, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I really don’t get all these threats about voting for other people or not voting. Its not going to change the outcome. Groups of people or certain states don’t get to be counted more than others. Black votes have the same value as white votes. At the end of the day, Obama will have more votes and delegates. That’s that. Both Hillary and Obama are better candidates then any of us have seen for quite a while, so why don’t we just marvel at the primary season and hold off on the histrionics?

Posted by: Greg | May 7, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Obama is a disgrace! I don’t care if they put Clinton on the ticket and she has his child.
I won’t vote for this character on the top of a ticket.
It’s hard to believe the judgment of the Dem. party.

Posted by: porkfrog | May 7, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Yap!!! There we go again.
African Americans are only good for America when they line up decade after decade behind white Democrats.
THE MOMENT THEY SUPPORT ONE OF THEIR OWN; THEY ARE BRANDED RACISTS.
…pure trash.

Posted by: Jake | May 7, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Just a note to the Clinton supporters that keep saying Obama can’t win the GE without white voter support you are 100% correct. Now let me give you a news flash Clinton can’t win the GE without Black voter support, and if she wins fair and square I think she would have that 90% black vote that the dems have enjoyed for a long time but if she steals this nomination from him which appears to be her only option left and apparently the white voters on here have no problem with the first ever AA nominee to win as the rules where laid out being told to shut up and go away, then she will not get black voter support and she will not win

Posted by: You all can't win | May 7, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

I don’t have any problem with Hillary staying in the race, as long as she does what is best for the party. I truly can’t imagine a scenario that leads to Hillary Clinton getting hte nomination that allows her to win the general. She has to be honest with herself about what can be achieved now. Its time for the party to begin to heal itself. All those posters claiming 50%of Dems won’t vote for Obama are either Republicans in disguise or just very bitter and not really interested in what is best for the country.

Posted by: markymark | May 7, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

True Truth,
Can the Dems win without the black and young votes?
Stop being an HRC idiot!

Posted by: jo pierre | May 7, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

If Hillary is pushed out of the race then this will be the first time my friends and I will vote for a Republican in November. The DNC should be encouraging Hillary to stay in the contest and count Florida and Michigan. Remember, it was not so long ago, that McCain was going to switch from the Republican to the Democratic party. I think that will make our choice easier come November.

Posted by: reality08 | May 7, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I hope they all come out for Obama and end this mess of crap now.
Emily then you can go and vote for Mc Caim and when another 1500 men and women die in the war just remember you played right into his hans keeping them there.

Posted by: h | May 7, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

To people positng on this blog and saying that Obama won only “black” states! Please!! Since when are Iowa, Wisconsin black states? They are white as snow! :)

Posted by: Jack, Chapel Hill, NC | May 7, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Even Tiki Barbers brother said he didn’t vote in the Florida Primary because he thought it wouldn’t count then afterwards it counts, how fair is it for those people who didn’t vote after being told it won’t count, they lose there right to vote. The Mich and Fl delegations will be seated even if seated as they finished in FL and mich(with Obama of the ballot) she would still be losin by about 100 delegates and 100,000 vote.

Posted by: Even Tiki Barbers | May 7, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Emily, anyone who says Obama has the worst senate record obviously hasn’t done their research. You seem to be just another one of those who parrot what they’ve heard other people say without checking it out first. You just don’t like Obama, plain and simple, for whatever reasons you have tucked up there in what you call your brain. Don’t use his senate record as an excuse because his senate record is exemplary.

Posted by: nikita | May 7, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

She made a pledge that these primaries would not count a pledge means to make a promise, like the plede Bill Clinton made when he married Hillary. After the Michigan vote she said Obviously the Michigan vote does not count thats what she said now that she needs it she blames Obama, all the Canidates made this pledge in the begining and only one is dropping that pledge the same canidate who people think is dishonest.
Ask yourself if Obama won florida and mich would she be championing there cause now?

Posted by: She made a pledge | May 7, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Truth be told both candidates pledged not to campaign ONLY. And Obama broke that without penalty.

Posted by: porkfrog | May 7, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

z
There is no reason to believe BO won’t turn out to be a reasonable, or even a good pres. On the other hand, the same can be said that he will turn into a disaster just like Bush.
This is exactly the problem of doubting him because there is nothing for him to show to win or to gain confidence in him.
A glimpse exhibited by his judgment in the past 20 years has not been comforting. If he could sit in Wright’s church embracing what his pastor preached for 20 years, without saying anything, it is a problem in his judgment (not having to do whether or not he himself believes in it). On the other hand if he really did not know what is going on, so as he claimed and wanted people to believe, it calls into question of his judgment and awareness of his environment. Moreover, when it becomes inconvenient for his politics, he changed his explanations 5 times to finally “disassociated from Wright. This further calls into question of his judgment and decision making.
He is simply a gamble. You might win (and be right), or you might lose (and wrong). There was a gamble for 8 years already.
Even you do not have to like all McCain, you at least know what you are going to get, and there is a balance in the Congress.
With BO, there is probably not even a balance anymore, as Bush and the Reps in the past 8 years.

Posted by: Olbermann3 | May 7, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Obama had nothing to do with the primaries in Florida and Michigan moving up against party rules. If you want to blame someone, blame the people that run the democratic party in those two states. They were told ahead of time that if they moved their primaries up, they would not count! Both Clinton and Obama agreed to this. Now that she’s losing, she wants to have those delegates count for her and she also wants to move the number of delegates needed to win the nomination up to 2209!
You can’t change the rules just to accomodate one candidate over another.
Those that will either vote for Mcain or not vote at all when Obama wins the nomination are wasting their vote and allowing the Republicans to hold on to the white house and at least four more years of disaster!
The Democrats HAVE GOT TO WIN THE WHITE HOUSE!

Posted by: Desert Storm Veteran | May 7, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

It’s all a mess. I agree that Obama will most likely be the nominee now but they are nominating one of the most left wing, unpatriotic politicians I have ever seen and putting him against a CENTRIST, ex-POW Republican.
Are they mad?

Posted by: Mark | May 7, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

What did you know before primary?
What do you know right now?
Is not the time to reconize “The Emperor”s New Clothes”
Is not the time to end this drama?

Posted by: jy2008 | May 7, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Obama used every trick in his power to prevent revotes!! Plain and simple.
That is the only thing I am laying at his feet.
We were trying to comply, but he sent lobbys to prevent that because if we voted he would lose.
Then he made fun of Florida and Ohio about their voting problems, again like bitterd-gate it was aired over live TV.
Then he called us renegades while blocking our opportunity. It was printed in the news.

Posted by: porkfrog | May 7, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Not much to assess it is over.
Obama08

Posted by: Thinking | May 7, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Emily – the lobby bill was handed to him by the party elders to boost his resume.

Posted by: boneheaded, chicago | May 7, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

John McCain was a centrist Republican back after he lost in 2000 and was very angry at the Republican Party. Post-2004 his voting record is almost spotlessly conservative. More importantly if you care about virtually any of the issues on the table this year, he has conservative positions on all of them: 1) making the Bush tax cuts permanent (with a corporate tax cut just for good measure), 2) healthcare reform, 3) Iraq war, and 4) conservative judges. We shouldn’t be trivializing the importance of this election. The next 4 years are critical. A Republican in the presidency and Democrats in Congress doesn’t mean balance, it means gridlock.

Posted by: Greg | May 7, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Never put a man of Obamas’ character in a position of power.

Posted by: porkfrog | May 7, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Obama cannot win in the General Election-he has no judgement on his friends or wife or church. Personally, I would hope he wouldn’t answer the 3 AM call–ANYONE else would be better. Hillary is the one democrat I would vote for, but not if she is on BO’s ticket–It looks like I will be voting for McCain. The Dems have managed to pick another loser, and this should’ve been their year.

Posted by: virginia | May 7, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Greg has it about right.
A president McCain would kow tow to THE BASE by appointing Bush Style Judges to keep them quiet.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | May 7, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Emily
Your thoughts are well taken. Please do vote for 4 years of McCain – and do stand up to be counted when he nominates a couple of Scalias and Alitos to the Supreme Court, and a womans right to choose is taken away :-)
Me – I’m a man I dont care !! Maybe you wwill Emily

Posted by: ncvoter | May 7, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

The dems sure do pick em. McGovern, Dukakis, Kerry, Gore, even throw in Carter for good measure.
You know the super delegates were created just so this wouldn’t happen again.
And you know what? There going to let it happen again.
The good news is that Mc Cain is a decent competent qualified man who will make a good president.
Dems don’t deserve to win if they are going to keep making the same mistakes.
Maybe they’ll go to winner takes all and let the states hold primaries whenever they want and have no caucuses next time so they can actually pick a winner. But that’s a big maybe.

Posted by: s.b. | May 7, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

The Superdelegate concept was not created so they could mirror the popular vote. Just the opposite, in fact. The supers are there to add their experience to the equation and vote for the candidate that can win in the general election, If they allow themselves to be falsly accused of being politically incorrect they are not doing their job. We do not need four more years of Republican vetos and bad decisions. Obama is not so wonderful. He is crafty, yes, but as the months go on that will start to show. He is a pretty good actor and his script writers have Deval Patrick’s speeches and game plan in their briefcases. Deval Patrick, African-American Governor of Massachutes wrote the script in his victory in that state. In the runup to the Wisconsin primary Obama’s writers slipped up and Obama gave a speech with lines almost word for word on one of Patrick’s speeches. They won’t make that mistake again. Obama with little experience is a wellspring of empty promises that he would find difficult to deliver if he were elected but he also has a poor chance of being elected anyway when the entire country has their say about him versus an admired war hero with many years of political trials and errors. Of all the candidates that started the primary Hillary has always been the best qualified to wrestle with the spirited McCain. Biden would have been pretty good too though. If the Supers do not do the right thing we may be in for years of second rate health care for many, dominance by corporate interests and maybe war that could be avoided.

Posted by: bruce | May 7, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Emily, you forgot the main reason you will never vote for Obama—because he’s half Black. You make some idiotic claims in your post, which you could never prove. You seem to be of the same mind as Sean Hannity and Karl Rove.
Try opening your mind and thinking for yourself sometime, it really can be enlightening. I guess you do not know even one racist? No one you know has been arrested? Never heard a friend criticize the war?
My point here is that even if your unproven feelings about Obama were true (which they are not), that does not define him. Senate confirmation makes Presidential appointments of questionable people impossible. Obama’s mother is white, so your apparent fear of a Black man is unfounded.
Perhaps you really are a Republican and only supported Hillary ’cause she’s part woman. In 8 years, Chelsea will be 35 if you start now, she may be electable by 2016. At least she won’t have the extensive baggage, lying tendencies, and devisive personality of her mom.
Hillary could have easily beaten Obama. She ran a poor campaign and did not have a vision. Those are qualities a good president must have, or it’s more like Bush. There will be no 2012 for Hillary, she likely will loose her senate seat in 2010.
Keep hope alive!

Posted by: Dean | May 7, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

MJ…Still missing the point I was making. I believe you should vote for WHOEVER you believe allies most closely to YOUR values. But to vote for someone who you DON’T support out of spite because someone you DID support didn’t get the nomination is foolish.
Our founding fathers would be ashamed of us for these kinds of arguments. They didn’t expect us to agree but they didn’t expect us to be petty and goofy. They suffered and risked all for this land to become a nation on its own. Voting is a sacred rite as far as I’m concerned.
I’m all for supporting the candidate you believe in-but don’t be ridiculous enough to support someone you don’t just because you’re PO’d that you’re gal didn’t get the nomination. That’s high school BS and if you’re still into that crap…maybe its better you don’t vote at all.

Posted by: Suz in KS | May 7, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Its not Obama’s fault he ran a vastly superior campaign. When he won the moveon.org endorsement, that grass roots support was astronomical. Especially in fundraising.
It is true that you cant find any major analyst who says Obama is the better candidate for the whitehouse. All the Obama supporters talk about is the delegate math.
But being the best candidate for the whitehouse is NOT the way you nominate someone.
The person who runs the best campaign and gets 2025 delegates wins the nomination.
Obama won that. He deserves to be the nominee.
Lets rally around him.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 7, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

The truth is as Niel Cavuto says Obama can’t win without super delagates but it is ok to ask Hillary to step down she stii has a chance to win or come real close so lets just see. what happens, and Dood is full of it we have six months. not weeks there are still 17 sen. 79 house dems uncomitted and Hillary did have a win last night.So I will go donate again.And kennedy why did he take it to the floor with a 700 dif.from carter.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Hillary is a power hungry fool. She can’t see the forest for the trees.
Throwing good money after bad!~!
If someone doesn’t like her all they would need to do to break her is tell her she’s got a real chance.
The only chance she has is if she buys the super delegate votes which is what her intention is anyway.
Personally, I hope she goes down!

Posted by: Brian | May 7, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Obama won’t win Ga we are a republican state and thats the way it is

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

I don’t think Hillary should step down now. But I think she has a very slim chance of being the nominee.

Posted by: lisa | May 7, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Sure Hillary drop out so I can win Im tierd. Obama said

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

We are going to fight to the end it is not impossible for her to win it ain’t over yet.Even Joe Andrew Obama new super two min ago on fox.if she slams him in WV.PR. and Ky. his lead will shrink.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Obama could not even beat Hillary in an Illinois border state, Indiana, where he was favored a month ago and outspent her over two to one. I think this only makes it more clear who would do best in the Fall. John McCain is ready for prime time and he will pick a strong quailfied running mate. He will be a real tough opponent and Democrats must put up another ready for prime time candidate, not one who is afraid of debating. In Philadelphia Obama stuttered and hemed and hawed. He cannot opt out of the series of debates with McCain, like he ducked Hillary in Indiana. McCain has ten times more on stage debating experience than Obama and he will be very ready. The debates to come may just decide the election in November. Let’s get a vote from Florida and Michigan too. Let’s be fair. I want to add I am ashamed of all the so called Democrats who are posting re-cycled empty, false garbage about Hillary. They are not Democrats, Supers do your job and vote for the best candidate as that is why the super concept was concieved.

Posted by: bruce | May 7, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

I have had to sit through months of Hillary bashing from blogs and the media as well as other Senator Obama supporters. We’ve had to sit and listen to the race thing and the gender thing. We are tired and frustrated at the lack of respect this process has presented. Obama will not win the general election because the main stream media such as MSNBC, NBC, FOX, and CNN are all Republican backed stations. They have fueled division between the camps. Some Obama supporters are cruel and disrespectful to Senator Clinton. If Obama looses and McCain wins, they will blame Clinton. When the only reason he lost was because of disrespect from the media and Obama supporters. I will sit this one out this year. It looks like the Democratic Party is putting a John Kerry up for the nomination. It’s like De Je vu all over again.

Posted by: Lois, California | May 7, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

If Obama only won states with primarily black voters I can understand the argument that he won only because he is black. But look back and see how he overwhelmly won the states he won. Guys, he won 32 states. 32! Hillary is great but Obama earned it!

Posted by: marcus | May 7, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

“True Truth” (yeah, right):
Convenient how you exclude the caucus states when you talk about the number of white voters vs black voters Obama has won. If Clinton had been stronger in caucuses than Obama, I’m sure you’d be taking the same stance.
Anyway, you miss the larger point, which is that Obama will pick up most of Clinton’s supporters once he becomes the nominee. Sure, not the bigoted ones, but who needs ‘em?
The rest of you whiners need to get a grip. Those of you who are not racist against African Americans need to do a gut check and really ask yourselves if John McCain is what you want for another four years.
He would prolong the war in Iraq for God-knows-how-long, until we achieve “victory”, even though McCain hasn’t been able to define what “victory” would be in pragmatic, realistic terms.
He is opposed to Universal Health Care in any form (THE centerpiece of Hillary’s campaign).
He wants to continue the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy while our schools and infrastructure crumble.
While he’s one of the few Republicans to actually believe in global warming, his overall voting record and that and other environmental issues is dismal.
He will continue to reward corporations for shipping our jobs oversees so that they can get even richer while working class people find it harder and harder to get by.
McCain’s flip flopping on major issues like the Bush tax cuts will make Republicans sorry that they ever perfected that line of attack four years ago. He is a very vulnerable candidate who has so far escaped the intense media scrutiny both Democrats have received. That is about to change.
And have you seen/heard McCain’s preacher friends like John Hagee and Rod Parsley (whose political support he actively pursued) and other shady associates, Emily? Far worse than Obama’s, my friend. Just wait and see.
Also, I can’t stand by and let you make such woefully ignorant statements as “He also can’t win the G.E. having colluded with the DNC to disenfranchise Florida and Michigan voters.”
He followed the rules (which he had nothing to do with making)! It is much more disenfranchising to change rules in the middle of the game. Obama supporters didn’t even have a chance to vote for him in Michigan, and many stayed home in Florida because they were told their vote wouldn’t count, while Clinton heavily encouraged her supporters to turn out in large numbers there. Furthermore, she went into that non-contest with the best known name in the Democratic Party. You can try to assign blame for no revotes to Obama all you want, but the evidence is heavily stacked against you.
“I can’t live with betraying my own principles to vote for Obama. I also can’t live with those who may be Obama’s choices for the Supreme Court. His choice of wife, pastor, and friends tell me his choice of appointees will be similarly reprehensible.”
So who would you presume his Supreme Court and cabinet choices to be? Jeremiah Wright? William Ayers? Osama bin Laden? Give me a break. Obama has a long, consistent history of working with Democrats and Republicans and has often said that his cabinet would consist of highly qualified people from both parties.
Why do you think that people from all ends of the spectrum in the Democratic Party, many of whom are far more experienced than Clinton, are getting behind Obama? I dare you to find one person who has actually worked with him that would say they think his views are anywhere near Wright’s crazy talk, or Ayers’ past radicalism. And to clarify, his wife’s “proud” statement was about the country’s political process, that people for the first time (in her adult life) seemed to be forcefully rejecting, in large numbers, the political games of division and fear-mongering. The same games you sadly seem content to perpetuate.

Posted by: Willis P | May 7, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

“True Truth” (yeah, right):
Convenient how you exclude the caucus states when you talk about the number of white voters vs black voters Obama has won. If Clinton had been stronger in caucuses than Obama, I’m sure you’d be taking the same stance.
Anyway, you miss the larger point, which is that Obama will pick up most of Clinton’s supporters once he becomes the nominee. Sure, not the bigoted ones, but who needs ‘em?
The rest of you whiners need to get a grip. Those of you who are not racist against African Americans need to do a gut check and really ask yourselves if John McCain is what you want for another four years.
He would prolong the war in Iraq for God-knows-how-long, until we achieve “victory”, even though McCain hasn’t been able to define what “victory” would be in pragmatic, realistic terms.
He is opposed to Universal Health Care in any form (THE centerpiece of Hillary’s campaign).
He wants to continue the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy while our schools and infrastructure crumble.
While he’s one of the few Republicans to actually believe in global warming, his overall voting record on that and other environmental issues is dismal.
He will continue to reward corporations for shipping our jobs oversees so that they can get even richer while working class people find it harder and harder to get by.
McCain’s flip flopping on major issues like the Bush tax cuts will make Republicans sorry that they ever perfected that line of attack four years ago. He is a very vulnerable candidate who has so far escaped the intense media scrutiny both Democrats have received. That is about to change.
And have you seen/heard McCain’s preacher friends like John Hagee and Rod Parsley (whose political support he actively pursued) and other shady associates, Emily? Far worse than Obama’s, my friend. Just wait and see.

Posted by: Willis P | May 7, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

I see the Obama supporters are already pulling the ‘if you dont vote for Obama you are a racist’ card .
Look. Obama won the nomination. Every single analyst says he is the weaker nominee. So what? He won the nomination fair and square.
You dont upset the whole process and give it to Hillary just because she is the better nominee. Thats not fair to Obama .
The dems should have thought about this before they HYPED Obama to death. Its their own fault.
Now they will run him against Mc Cain.
Instead of complaining about all this, lets just rally behind him.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 7, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

I am not rally behin him I’ve been thier done that for at least five of the pamper pups no more.that is what are super dels are for.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Why do we have super delagates.what are they for. If they don’t do this fair it will rip the party apart any way.

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

If Obama can beat Hillary in WV and Ky. I’ll vote for him. After all he is the front runner

Posted by: Bishop | May 7, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

tomdavie:
It’s well documented that many of Clinton’s supporters wouldn’t vote for Obama because he’s black. Sorry, just a fact.
As I said, those people are in the minority and are unnecessary for a win in the general election.
The rest of my message was aimed at Clinton supporters who are NOT racist but are still threatening to defect to McCain. They need to do a gut check and honestly take a look at what a McCain presidency would look like as opposed to an Obama presidency. They’ve spent so much time getting angry at Obama over the course of this head to head contest with their candidate that they’ve neglected looking deeply into what McCain is all about. Not just on policy, but also character and his own shady associations.

Posted by: Willis P | May 7, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Obama cant win in WV nor Kentucky. i would be suprised if he even campaigned there.
It doesnt matter. Hillary should drop out , but I dont think she will . The dems want the extra hype of voter registration in the remaining states.
Its like a Las Vegas act going around the country selling out arenas.
The Obama -Clinton show.
I understand the scam, I just dont understand why they would want ordinary folks who are starving to donate to their campaigns under the impression its still a race.
This isnt fair.
And until the super delegates come out and stand behind obama, Hillary isnt going to give up. Anyone blaming her for staying in is foolish.
The super delegates could have ended this long ago, but I suspect if they dont come out now, its simply because they want to boost voter registration in the remaining states.
That distress me greatly.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 7, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Just wondering when some of the super delegates are going to get some courage and actually support Hillary who will fix this economy. Seriously, American needs to prosper again and prosper safely.

Posted by: Hello, Supers? Hello??? | May 7, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Willis.
Anyone who wont vote for Obama because he is black is an IDIOT.
But as a whitie myself, I can tell you that I have never met a person yet who thinks Obama shouldnt win because he is a ‘darkie’ .
Perhaps these people exists. It breaks my heart to think they do, but they are a small subset.
99% of the hillary supporters I know dont support Obama because he is too green and Hillary is the better candidate.
It is a valid argument. So try not to jump straight to some racist angle whenever someone puts Obama down. Chances are overwhelming that it inst the reason.

Posted by: tomdavie | May 7, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

What do you think is going to happen to Obama in the general election when the African Americans who have voted for him realize he does not identify with them either? Surely McCain will win the election- Obama will not whether he is the nominee or not. Wake up and smell the roses Obama supporters. If you feel strongly for Hillary, you really do not like Obama however, Obama supporters will support Hillary in the event he does not get it. They have in the past. The AA’s forget that it was the Clintons that stood up and fought for all of us, AA’s included. What has Barack Obama done for you? Its like a cult of ignorance that just follows him around. I’m disgusted.

Posted by: Julie G. | May 7, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Count me in as a Democrat that will vote for McCain, along with family and friends. McCain is moderate and if he picks a running mate that’s not too far right, I won’t have a problem voting for him. Democrats for McCain.

Posted by: kittyCat | May 7, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Hillary Clinton has planned all along to let Obama sink or swim on his own. Clinton really didn’t want to use her pincers on her old friend John McCain.
If McCain wins in November, he’ll be a one-termer and HRC will have an easy run in 2012. If Obama wins in November, she will work against him behind the scenes and undermine him to a degree that Obama will be impeached. Hillary would then be the inescapable alternative.
She’s very tricky.

Posted by: Dave | May 7, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

pro-Hillary but voting McCain = racist.
At least ADMIT you’re racist. Its kind of pathetic when people make up excuses to mask their racism.
Say you wont vote for Barack Obama because he’s black. Show some spine. Racist = chickensheyt.
And that is why you people will vote for McCain.
And that is why you’ll get what you deserve.
A bad bruising in November when Obama wins :)
You people are tragic. No wonder America’s so messed up.

Posted by: Gemma | May 7, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Why are they racist if they switch to McCain. What is your evidence. McCain has many years of political experience and is fairly moderate. Hillary has been in the political game since way back in the eighties when she started with the McGovern campaign. Obama is hot air and they think that his lack of experience, his ties to crazy Ayers and crazy Wright and racist Michells are just too much and so wouold rather live under a more moderate President. Nothing racist about that.

Posted by: bruce | May 7, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

I do see racism emerging in the general as a reason for many to not vote for Obama. Same as in the Dem primaries.
What will be interesting is how the slick and artful rationales for the latent racism will be operationalized in the next 5 months.

Posted by: Chas | May 7, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Why are we so jazzed about the states which will NEVER be under Democratic rule such as NC and SD .The dems need to get that revote going in Florida and Michigan BEFORE AUGUST!!Its already been paid for by private donors yet OBAMA is blocking it!!

Posted by: DaneNM | May 7, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

CHAS…….Racism for NOT for voting for Obama?? Exit polls point to REVERSE discrimination with 92% of blacks voting for B.O. cause he IS (1/2)black….

Posted by: DaneNM | May 7, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Hillary is !!!!! ROCKY !!!!!. Yes, remember when the big fight was coming up and Rocky said to Adrian.-(Ah come on, Adrian, it’s true. I was nobody. But that don’t matter either, you know? ‘Cause I was thinkin’, it really don’t matter if I lose this fight. It really don’t matter if this guy opens my head, either. ‘Cause all I wanna do is go the distance. If I can go that distance, you see, and that bell rings and I’m still standin’, I’m gonna know for the first time in my life, see, that I weren’t just another bum from the neighborhood-)– Then in the fight when Rocky was bloody and Apollo Creed looked at him with a look of sad wonderment. Like he was thinking “why don’t you just quit?” but Rocky fought on and TIED the fight and at the end it was Apollo saying ” in a loud voice, ” Don’t want no rematch!.”

Posted by: bruce | May 7, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Chas and look at all the women who voted for Hillary only because she is a woman. And not all AA voted for Obama just because he is black.

Posted by: d | May 7, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Oh, let’s not confuse voters in West Virginia! Dodd should ask Jon Stewart for a job as an intern, because the arguement is hilarious.
Senator, just look at the polls: If Obama runs against McCain, West Virginia is not even close for the Democrats! Clinton would carry the state, Obama does not have a snowball’s chance in that hot place…
Let’s face it, Obama is the black candidate and he will lose the white rural and working class vote, in the primaries to Clinton, in the General to McCain.

Posted by: Steve-O | May 7, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Democrats always lose when they nominate elitist liberals. Obama is the most liberal senator in the current senate and he has no experience worth talking about.
As soon as the Republican attack machine rips into his fake smiles, he will start whining about “old politics and racism” and the Republicans couldn’t care less.
If you look at all the candidates the two parties offered to the American public, you have to ask yourself: ‘Are you kiddin’ me? Is that the best you can come up with? Not a single governor from a really big state, a bunch of former somethings and a few senators with doubtful records. Nevertheless, the Republicans managed to pick the best from the sorry lot and the Democrats are about to pick the empty suit…

Posted by: Pete Zebulon | May 7, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Emily -” I Refuse To Buy Into the Obama Hype” by grassroots mom – dailykos diary Feb 20, 2008 has all of Obama’s and Clinton’s Senate accomplishments right from the Library of Congress. THIS is research. Much of what you spouted is second hand half truth garbage.

Posted by: nikita | May 7, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Bayh – ‘As long as it is a respectable debate , I don’t think this will be harmful for the Democratic party.’
Even if it not harmful, it is not useful either. It serves no purpose.
The worst it can do is help McCain November.
Hillary should stop acting like a brat and give up her fight.

Posted by: Dev | May 7, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

The reason there is this acrimony in this comment thread is because the candidates are nearly equally matched according to the voting public… if we respect all voters and their decision making process. The idea that McCain would be a better choice than either HRC or BO is nonsense. It is hard to lose…I know, I lose all the time! And I would be bummed for a bit if my candidate isn’t nominated. So, when the dust settles and one of the Dems comes through, I will be voting for him or her. Would I love a better candidate than either NRC or BO, and by that I mean someone more socialist and left wing – absolutely. But until that happensm I will stick with the party that at least tries to do something for all, rather than destroy whatever goodwill is left in this darn beautiful country.

Posted by: POLSON | May 7, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

I don’t see why we’re even debating about this. It’s just simple mathematics. Obama will be the nominee- period. Hillary has a right to continue as long as she wants- but it will be in vain. Honestly, I think she enjoys campaigning- so let her spend some of her millions on her campaign hoopla. Live it up girl!

Posted by: macbeth76 | May 7, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

These Dems threatening to vote McCain in Nov- you don’t scare anyone. Obama will prevail in November. He has the right ideas, right plan, campaigns honestly and has plenty enough backers to beat McGrandpa in the fall.

Posted by: macbeth76 | May 7, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Suz in KS,
Do you honestly think that GWB had more experience coming in as president than BO will have?
More importantly, do you honestly think that GWB has 10% of the intelligence and judgment that BO has?
You don’t have to be a genius to be president. You just have to have the wisdom to surround yourself with genius. GWB has proven over and over again that he doesn’t even have that little bit of wisdom. He just wanted to be a “war” president.
He got what he wished for, and it has been a disaster for our nation.
Barack has surrounded himself with some of the most astute minds in politics. Don’t tell me that he won’t be listening to their counsel. Nor that he will not be the one to make the final judgment on any decision.
I recall a channel 13 show when Zbignew Brezinski told ppl during the Carter years that the cold war was OVER. We’d already won, and decisively. Reagan got the credit, but Zbig was right then. And the 2 pundits looked at him like he had 2 heads.
And a man with this intellect is on the BO team.
Get with the program, and move our country forward again!
Ron

Posted by: Ron | May 8, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

If BO is only getting black votes and blacks are only 11% of the population please explain how and why BO leads in delegates and popular vote.

Posted by: Know Me | May 8, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

I really think the antics of Hillary Clinton supporters are childish. The fact is Obama has won the most votes, the most delgates and the most states. The way you people make it sound, one would think he has done absolutely nothing to deserve to be in the lead. The fact is he rean a brilliant campaign against all odds and even when you include Michigan and Florida, he is still well in the lead. So what is your argument ?
The superdelegates are going to decide who should carry the nomination and one would suspect they would support Obama. Well if they do, what is your argument against voting him ? He won the most states, most delegates, most votes and most superdelegates. He is intelligent, articulate and his position on all the major issues is similar to that of Hillary Clinton…so why wouldn’t you vote him ?? I daresay it’s a race issue.

Posted by: Freddyjuwel | May 8, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Obama, while in the Illinois State Senate, passed an eminently sensible law requiring all police interrogations to be videotaped.
There had been a recurring problem with coerced confessions. If all interrogation is videotaped, it becomes pretty obvious whether a confession is coerced or not. This helps innocent people who are coerced — but it also helps police, because shyster defense attorneys won’t be able to claim coercion where there was none.
Yet this law faced massive opposition at first, from police, the Republicans in Illinois, and many of the Democrats as well. Eventually he managed to convince the police, the Republicans, and so forth that this would actually make the job of prosecuting criminals a *lot* simpler.
Obama’s a political genius and he’s got good, *down-to-earth* ideas.
Obama tells the truth and is remarkably uncorrupt — in fact, he’s boringly honest. Some of his friends are wackos and some are crooks — but everyone has some friends like that, and he has a lot fewer than most politicians. (Look up McCain’s links with extremely deranged pastor Hagee, or his sweetheart deals with lobbyists, or the Keating Five.)
I don’t fall for Obama’s lofty rhetoric, but I do think it will be a hell of a big help in the fall, compared to Hillary’s incompetent rhetoric (she can’t even win Minnesota or Oregon? Seriously.)
McCain has literally reversed himself on *everything* he ever stood for — he was against torture, now he’s for the ‘water cure’, he wrote the McCain-Feingold campaign financing rules, then he broke them, he was against Bush’s War, then he hugged Bush and announced his support, etc. etc. You want dishonesty, unfortunately you should look there.
Electability? Sure, Obama probably won’t win West Virginia in the fall. He’ll make up for that by winning Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Iowa, etc.
Bayh – ‘As long as it is a respectable debate , I don’t think this will be harmful for the Democratic party.’
Absolutely, which is why some of us are so ticked off that Hillary Clinton has abandoned respectable debate in favor of nonsense like the gas tax scam ( http://www.gastaxscam.com/ ).

Posted by: Rrrgh. | May 8, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.