May 21, 2008 6:59pm

Webb: Affirmative Action Behind Obama Woes

ABC News’ Teddy Davis, Mike Elmore, and Talal Al-Khatib Report: Virginia Sen. Jim Webb (D), who has not made a 2008 endorsement, blamed antipathy towards affirmative action — and not racism — on Wednesday for Barack Obama’s lack of support among the Scots-Irish in places like Kentucky, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania.

"We shouldn’t be surprised at the way they are voting right now," said Webb in an interview with MSNBC. "This is the result of how affirmative action, which was basically a justifiable concept when it applied to African-Americans, expanded to every single ethnic group in America that was not white. And these were the people who had not received benefits and were not getting anything out of it."

Watch the interview here.

Obama supports the continuation of race-based affirmative action though he would informally encourage college admissions officers not to apply it to minorities who have enjoyed privileged upbringings. The Democratic presidential frontrunner has also has said that he would like to see affirmative action extended to poor whites. 

While laying out the hurdles posed by the legacy of race-based affirmative action, Webb expressed confidence that Obama, who would be the nation’s first African American president, can overcome them.

"The fact that they would line up and vote this way is not so much a comment on Barack," said Webb. "I think Barack Obama is saying a lot of good things that will appeal to this cultural group in time."

Jessica Smith, a Webb spokesperson, told ABC News that Webb’s reference to "in time" refers to this election cycle.
She also pointed to former Virginia Gov. Doug Wilder (D), the nation’s first black governor, as a model for Obama.

"He took the time to engage the people in the ‘Reddest’ parts of the state," said Smith, "and they took to the fact that his goals and interests were in concert with their own. Senator Webb believes that, with appropriate time spent in these parts of the country, Senator Obama will similarly command the vote."

Webb, whose 2005 book Born Fighting looks at how the Scots-Irish have shaped America, said Wednesday that he bristles when it is suggested that racism is behind Obama’s paltry performance among this group.

"When I hear people say this is racism, it gets my back up a little bit because that’s my cultural group," said Webb. "This isn’t Selma, 1965."

During his Wednesday interview on MSNBC’s "Morning Joe," Webb touted a 2004 op-ed he wrote for The Wall Street Journal in which he not only argued that diversity programs have had "an unequal impact" on white ethnic groups but also expressed his hope that an alliance could one day be forged with African Americans.

"The key thing," said Webb, is "if this cultural group could get at the same table with black America, you could really change American politics because they have so much in common in terms of what they need out of government."

Asked if an Obama-Webb ticket might be the way to bring those two groups to the same table, Webb’s spokesperson played it coy.

"I’m not going to answer that question," said Smith.

User Comments

BO smells like dukakis kerry and mcgovern…
with only 25% of the white vote in DEMOCRATIC primaries like pa oh v wv in what can he expect when you include republicans in a general election? he’s soup meat

Posted by: greg | May 21, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

if u r white and don’t like obama you must be a racist…
oly 92% of blacks vote for obama – r they racist?

Posted by: leroy | May 21, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Those opposed to affirmative action found so many ways around it that it was not funny. The beneficiaries of affirmative action are those who gave it a shot, then liked the results. We are all better for it.
The ones that resented it are the same ones that wanted to keep their privilege at the expense of everyone “lesser” getting a fair shot. Meanwhile, us “lesser” folks paid taxes just like the rest of the “hard working whites” Hillary Clinton seeks votes from. But before affirmative action, it was hard for minorities to get good jobs in the government our own taxes supported.
That was then. Now all the contracts go to “hard working white” companies with minority figure heads.
I feel no compassion for people that still think poor whites are any different than poor any other race/ethnicity. I feel no compassion for whites that hate on blacks simply because they feel affirmative action slighted them.
Everyone willing deserves a leg up. Just because you might not get it, doesn’t make it right for you to hold another race accountable, especially in a Presidential election.
Stop voting against your own interest!
Obama ’08!

Posted by: Hope | May 21, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Webb is right. Affirmative action as it currently exists, doesn’t address the socio-economic disparities in this country. It needs to be completely overhauled and should no longer be based on race, but on economic status. Will this happen under an Obama presidency? From what I’ve heard so far, I don’t think so and I believe that is a huge concern for many working class Americans regardless of race – hence the limited support for Obama among this demographic group. I hope Obama proves me wrong if he is the next president.

Posted by: mhhunt | May 21, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

My interests are that we’re doing fine. Hubby’s job is good and we do well. That will all change if Obama wins because he’ll tax us to death.
So I’m voting my own interests like you say.
Thanks.

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

If you can recall, when the SD congressman will show up in the TV to say something. Basically before SD, VA and ND. What is the reason?

Posted by: kerry | May 21, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Hope the audacity and the arrogancy of that reasoning is that YOU LIBERALS deem to know what is in everyone’s best interest!
And you wonder why you guys get labeled “elitests.”
According to you, people voting for someone with their own skin color is in
their interest.

Posted by: Jo | May 21, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Hope,
You want us to stop voting against our own interests?
Well, I’m a woman and I’m white, so I guess voting for Hillary would be voting my own interest.
Is this what you meant?!

Posted by: Women Against Obama | May 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

I am tierd of talking about race webb was a republican not to long ago not a ggod runing mate for Obama 3/4 of Clintons support are women pissed off women so this is like just making us all tne mor e ticked. This is like fighting over the kids after you split up .

Posted by: Bishop | May 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

hmmm.. affirmative action for poor whites… that’s an interesting idea…

Posted by: MIguy | May 21, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

If a candidate is so vociferous in disobeying important rules, could you imagine what would happen should such a one becomes President?
The US Constitution would be trampled as is presently being done!
Lesson to Americans:
Campaign ugly and govern even uglier!
Bush administration is the latest example of that truism.
Let’s assume Hilary becomes President, would you trust Hellary to end the Iraq war or keep ANY of her worthless words? NO!

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Affirmative Action is for the birds. Mostly crows. Anyone that is not handicapped can make thier way if they try hard enough.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Reason Obama is ahead is that he won big in 15 states. Why are those states not important like West Virginia? I found this chart that sums it up:
Barack Obama: 15 States + DC
Compare
Obama 15 “Blowouts”!
* Virgin Islands (89.9%)
* Idaho (79%)
* Hawaii (76%)
* Alaska (75%)
* District of Columbia (75%)
* Kansas (74%)
* Washington (68%)
* Nebraska (68%)
* Minnesota (67%)
* Colorado (67%)
* Georgia (67%)
* Illinois (65%)
* Virginia (64%)
* Maryland (62%)
* North Dakota (61%)
* Wyoming (61%)
* Mississippi (61%)
Hillary Clinton: 3 States
* Arkansas (70%)
* West Virginia (67)
* Kentucky (65)

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country. John Kennedy said that. Obama refers to kennedy some times but apparently don’t agree with his philosophy.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Bush governs ugly is because he is incompetent. Obama is Bush in the leftist camp — He is inexperienced and unqualifies. Wait he teaches you about the 57 states in the US. And tells you ” salvery ” is the way to help your appreciate black’s sufferings.

Posted by: AMy | May 21, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Patriot:
Obama won the list states are lots of caucus, not the full will of state people. Some other states are the most populations of AAs.

Posted by: kerry | May 21, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Obama states don’t mean much in presidential race. Many of those states are Republican states.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

The dirt poo and undereducated whites of Appalachia are complaining and green with envy about ‘affirmative action’???
Were the dirt poor whites of Appalachia enslaved and disenfranchised for generations in America? lol
Or are the poor whites of Appalachia just too dang lazy to take advantaged of centuries-old opportunities FOR WHITES ONLY?
For centuries, the FREE AND UNFETTERED whites of Appalachia had ALL the opportunities available in America to whites ONLY!
For centuries, there has been NATIONAL CRIME against African people in America, which denied them opportunities for generations!
The whites of Appalachia have ALWAYS BEEN FREE to partake of America’s unlimited opportunities. So why are the whites of Appalachia so dirt poor and backward?

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Patriot:
High Black crime rates are not because of whits against them. They should find some reasons of them self.

Posted by: kerry | May 21, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

You are describing the working class that vote for Hillary so you must be an eletist that is voting for Obama.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Anders Scooper & kerry
lol
I bet Hellary would literally kill for Obama’s ‘blowout states’, which you and her continue to foolishly discount. LOSERS!
The reason America is now saddled with a loser President is because of people like yourself.
You excuse and encourage LOSERS like Hilary. And when such deceivers get into office, they screw you and the country!

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

There is racial discrimination in this country against the white now. Affirmative action is denying qualified white to college and many more.
Time for affirmative action for the white and poor and not for the rich and black.

Posted by: John_Lai | May 21, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

One of the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action has been women,including white women. The Scots Irish along with the Irish are no strangers to hard feelings towards other groups both in this country and in the six counties still occupied (and colonized or “planted” in Ireland). There the rich used religion to divide the Catholic and Protestant working classes much as race has been used all too often by the same types in this Country. A lot of the folks who voted for Hillary fit into the Pat Buchanan vote profile of those that have been dealt a short hand mad about a belief that someone else would take away the little they had. JFK talked about the revolution of rising expectations but with the tricks the Republicans have used of exploiting cultural issues such as guns, gays and God to give a hymn to sing behind their revolution of growing desperation. The green goddess of envy only needs a little bit for a mob to dance to her tune.

Posted by: bhciapol | May 21, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Blacks voting for Obama is clearly different because blacks have voted for whites for decades now and would do so again if one were the nominee.
(In fact blacks didn’t come out in droves for Obama until it looked like he could win.)
Alot of whites voting for Hillary wouldn’t vote for any black person at all and those are just the stats from the ones who owned up to it.
The former is simply voting for the one that emobodies your hopes and dreams and could win.
The other is racist.

Posted by: rixter | May 21, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

I do NOT vote for Obama is not because he is black, is because he is inexperienced and unqualified, his associations are dangerous to US.

Posted by: kerry | May 21, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Patriot, what you said about Appalachia is why white working class people will not vote for Obama. Get it.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Anders Scooper
| May 21, 2008 7:49:56 PM
I’m describing the spitefulness of the Appalachia people referenced by Webb.
Affirmative action is part compensation for generations of kidnapping, enslavement and repression.
The people of Appalachia WERE NOT ENSLAVED!
The people of Appalachia WERE ALWAYS FREE to pursue the WHITES ONLY American dream!
If the people Appalachia are today dirt poor and undereducated, maybe it is because of generation so laziness and lack of ambition in the face of WHITES ONLY opportunities in America?
So spiting Obama (their true savior) will not help their cause.
Obama is the ONLY candidate who would finally lift up the whites of Appalachia; but they are showing that they love their lives of racist misery! So sad.

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Patriot:
You still do not understand, Obama is a totally empty suit. He will do nothing. He even worsens the situation.

Posted by: kerry | May 21, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Women Against Obama,
Not if those are YOUR issues. I’ve never had a black woman to vote for, but it doesn’t matter since I know what an issue is. I don’t consider my race or my sex an issue. Last I checked, neither my race nor sex was paid for by my taxes.
I’m voting on the issues that matter to me (healthcare, overseas outsourcing, ending the war in Iraq).
Lotsa luck with your issues and your vote. Since I don’t really know what your issues are, I don’t know why you’re asking me accept to maybe justify or question my black vote for Obama.
Obama ’08!

Posted by: Hope | May 21, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Hillary is the better candidate to do the job because she is more experienced and a fighter, which a president has to be to get the job done.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

I’m an Obama supporter; however, Webb’s commentary displays a lack of meaningful analysis and fails to address the blatent irony–that being the biggest group beneficiary of affirmative action are white women.
Can’t wait for more interpretations of Appalachia logic…..

Posted by: jeanette | May 21, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Anders Scooper
| May 21, 2008 7:57:20 PM
Those Appalachians who will not vote for Obama have grown accustomed to misery and hopelessness. Those who will vote for Obama aren’t too far gone.
Those Appalachians who will continue to vote for liars and deceivers, will continue to see the country ruined, while the 1.3 BILLION Chinese continue to forge ahead of the US!

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

My guess is that Sen. Obama’s monumental win in Oregon defeating Sen. Clinton by 18 points in a state in which the Clinton family campaigned vigorously and which is comprised of mostly white voters disproves Clintonites contentions that he cannot garner votes in those states. As to Caucuses, Sen. Clinton made a conscious decision to ignore them…her mistake.
It’s understandable for the losing team to disparage Sen. Obama’s accomplishments. It was Sen. Clinton that had been touted as the inevitable winner. Once she fell behind like crabs in a pail, she has made every effort to drag him down. Now she is touting new mathematical formulas and angrily denouncing the fact that Michiganders have no vote. Has anyone listened to her on You Tube when she said “you know, this [Michigan] election is not going to count for anything”
Doesn’t her word mean anything?

Posted by: elen | May 21, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Reason Obama is ahead is that he won big in 15 states. Why are those states not important like West Virginia? I found this chart that sums it up:
Barack Obama: 15 States + DC
Compare
Obama 15 “Blowouts”!
* Virgin Islands (89.9%)
* Idaho (79%)
* Hawaii (76%)
* Alaska (75%)
* District of Columbia (75%)
* Kansas (74%)
* Washington (68%)
* Nebraska (68%)
* Minnesota (67%)
* Colorado (67%)
* Georgia (67%)
* Illinois (65%)
* Virginia (64%)
* Maryland (62%)
* North Dakota (61%)
* Wyoming (61%)
* Mississippi (61%)
Hillary Clinton: 3 States
* Arkansas (70%)
* West Virginia (67)
* Kentucky (65)

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

This democratic race goes to dangerous zone, I think for the better country, the unqualified Obama should drop out of race right now to save our country.

Posted by: kerry | May 21, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

elen, Hillary won the white working vote in Oregon.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

“So spiting Obama (their true savior) will not help their cause.”
I cannot believe you said that. A SAVIOR???? Are you one of those that thinks Barack Obama is the new Messiah? That we who don’t support Obama are somehow doomed by our own ignorance and need to be saved by the Sainted One? Are you for real? Oh please! I can’t stand the man, and it is precisely because of this self righteous, arrogant, “I’m better than you and I will save you in spite of yourself” attitude that makes me despise him. I will gladly vote McCain to let the annointed one see that his “lift you up even if you don’t want to go” line of BS is insulting to every single person in this country. We are not a bunch of illiterate, ignorant, easily led sheep that are still living in the dark ages, and we don’t need Obama’s brand of enlightenment. His smug attitude will be his undoing. As far as voting my best interest, I vote my best interest, its Hillary first, John McCain second. At least I know I don’t have to worry every friggin second of the day that Obama will hand the security of our country over to Iran, Palestine, and Syria. Invite them to the White House and preach change, yeah, that is really going to change outlaw regimes that are hell bent on destroying the United States.

Posted by: jdona | May 21, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Patriot,
“Obama is the ONLY candidate who would finally lift up the whites of Appalachia; but they are showing that they love their lives of racist misery! So sad.”
Well said. Hillary is asking the poor to pay off her campaign debt plus the interest while she’s got $109 mil to fall back on. Should she win, more money for her MANDATORY healthcare plan will come out of their paychecks (if they work) and mine. These people seem to prefer to cling to their “whiteness”, they’re “femininity” and their other prejudices against all those people who stole their jobs because of “affirmative action” instead of getting off their lazy arses and researching a candidates plan — FOR THEM and others WHO ARE JUST LIKE THEM.
Sad, but I’m hoping for a change in them because they are holding the rest of the country back.
Obama ’08!

Posted by: Hope | May 21, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Obamakins are holding this country back by not voting for Hillary. Hillary has got the answers and she will roll up her sleeves and get the job done. Obama just doesn’t have any details.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

I am black, scored highest at my entrance test sitting to enter college, earned two degrees with honors, while married to an abusive drunk and raising 3 children and never even applied for a scholarship, race-based or otherwise.
Despite the complaints focused on racial minorities, I see that we’re not the only folks that need to quit complaining, get off our asses, get some education, and get some sustainable jobs.

Posted by: Jeanette | May 21, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Obama/Webb sounds like a Great ticket to blow away mc-more-war in the fall. Obama 2008!!!

Posted by: pt | May 21, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

jdona,
what are your reasons for voting hillary first, mccain second? w/o any reasons, people draw their own conclusions. limbaugh used to say that blacks voted for obama but couldn’t tell you why and i knew that to be untrue. maybe you can enlighten obama supporters about your choice.
Obama ’08!

Posted by: Hope | May 21, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Pelosi said on PBS this afternoon news,
that the votes do not count on primaries
and caucuses,only delegates.
Really?????????????????
If my vote doesn’t count,then what’s
the purpose of voting?????I don’t get it
Pelosi……..
I wonder why after 7 pm on primaries in my home state
blacks flooded the precincts to be
a delegate.
I went to be a delegate for Hillary but it was
impossible to get in.Fight broke out
with blacks and i left.Hillary won the
popular vote but
Obama got more delegates……..
Fraud,Fraud,Fraud…….
My pledge to DNC.I will not vote
democrat if Obama is on the ticket.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 21, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Hope:
1. He joined and remained active in a church where racism and anti-American hate is routinely preached. He and his family attended, and heavily contributed for about 20 years. This has received worldwide attention, as show in the link below.
Ten Must-See Videos from The Times Online
Obama first claimed not to know about Wright’s inflammatory statements. He later admitted he did.
CBS News
Flip-Flip Video
CBS News
OOPS… didn’t notice. Or else he forgot.
Rev Wright, one of the ministers, even promoted Obama and denigrated Hillary Clinton from the pulpit spurring an IRS investigation as to the validity of their non-profit status. The Obama campaign is also reported to have campaigned on at least one occasion at church events, furthering the curiosity of the IRS.
WCBS TV
Obama Speech at General Synod of the United Church of Christ
But, OOPS… he didn’t know. Or didn’t mind.
2. Senator Obama bought stock in two companies whose investors included his 2004 campaign political donors. One, in fact, was developing medicine to treat avian flu — with the stock purchase coming right before Obama introduced legislation to increase funding to combat the virus.
The other company, SkyTerra, received government permission to build a national wireless network on the day Obama purchased his shares. Among the principal owners of this business were four people who had raised more than $150,000 for Obama. Attorney Obama claimed later that they were in a semi-blind trust, that just didn’t legally work out. When this became public, Obama sold the stock.
Chicago Sun-Times
New York Times
Oops… he didn’t know. Or didn’t he mind?
3. Senator Obama came into politics through the famously corrupt Chicago political machine, with the help of some of the slimiest characters imaginable. (Several major players who helped him are have been indicted for graft, fraud, etc. Obama now keeps a rep at Rezko’s trial every day to monitor testimony.) Obama has had to donate to charity much of the money they gave him to get his start, though the admitted dollar amount keeps increasing as time goes on. It’s now up over $250,000. Tony Rezko, currently at trial on federal charges of attempted extortion, money laundering, and fraud, was also involved in the purchase of Obama’s home at well below market value.
Huffington Post
Chicago Sun-Times
New York Times
Not so well publicized is the fact that Obama wrote letters to the Illinois Dept of Housing, recommending Rezco’s company, North Kenwood, LLC, for the housing projects that soon became slums, causing inhumane hardship for their residents.
Obama Letters
These slums, later repossessed, were in Obama’s district while he was an Illinois senator. In fact, some are about a mile from his home, and several are still boarded up. Obama professed to be unaware of any problems. During the Democratic debate on January 21, 2008, Obama, in fact, gave the impression that he had merely done about 5 hours of legal work for “this individual.”
The Rezko Foreclosed Properties
telegraph.co.uk
No Quarter
Rezko Watch
Chicago Tribune: Almost Believable
OOPS… he didn’t know. Or did he care?

Posted by: kerry | May 21, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Hope has been around a long time and what has it accomplished as it relates to government. Obama is just a politician and will do no less or more than any other politician. His sermon of hope and change is just a political gimmick.

Posted by: Anders Scooper | May 21, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

ENOUGH about racism lets talk about patriotism! It has nothing to do with his color, its where his heart is. It is NOT with America. He is a fake. Wake up and spit out the kool aid!
Rixter said it best”I do NOT vote for Obama is not because he is black, is because he is inexperienced and unqualified, his associations are dangerous to US”.

Posted by: whatsbest | May 21, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Hope
| May 21, 2008 8:21:23 PM
Barack, the Magician, will find away around or through the Appalachians to victory, and eventually saved them from themselves. lol
There are many combination and permutations of the Electoral map. Obama will navigate a path to victory in the General Election as he’s done in the Primary.
That’s how it is with a TRUE LEADER: He is a visionary who sees many paths ahead.
The ‘experienced’ and ‘big states’ Clintons WRONGLY believed that there was only one path to the nomination.
They lost; because Obama was astutely counting Primary delegates! lol
When the dust is settled, pundits will look back and marvel at a well planned and the well executed campaign of the ‘inexperienced’ Obama that upstaged the overly ‘experienced’ Clintons machine. lol

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

wow, another race card from Webb and the Obamanuts. You left wingers are the laughingstock of this country. People get a kick out of Obama and Wright and Farrakan and Hamas and that whole Chicago Marxist crowd.
And you think we need a reason not to vote for that wild mess? You people are nuts.
I got an email from Howard Dean today. Wanted me to sign a petition complaining about McCain’s lobbysists. Why did I get it? Because I entered a form on their website telling them I’m gone from the Democratic Party if they want to go down with Obama once again, after McGovern, Carter (Obama gave the same papa talk to the children as Carter did, Carter wnet down to Reagan about as bad as Obama will go down to McCain), Mondale, Dukakis, and Kerry.
You Obama people are a bunch of left wing radicals. I’ll show myself out. It will be a wipeout of you liberals yet again.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 21, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

There are 1.3 BILLION Chinese just itching to moved ahead of America in EVERY department, if the next US President represents the past, if Americans are in another of their 911 slumber.
Thankfully, America needs and WILL HAVE the vision, judgment and Harvard educated intellect of a Barack Obama to guide the nation to higher heights.
Bush sat back and watched America being destroyed on 911; and Americans re-elected the loser?
So yes, America could again elect McCain AND SUFFER the consequences! It’s called ignorance, blindness and lack of self-esteem, Americans!

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

In 2 weeks all will be fine with the Democratic Party. Hillary will bow out gracefully and urge her supporters to support Obama because the alternative would be bush-3. That would be unacceptable to everyone that is now paying $4.00/gallon gas, having trouble paying health-care, and for all those brave soldiers that have been fighting a war that should have been avoided. Obama 2008!!!

Posted by: pt | May 21, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

You al say the Clinton’s are the greatest politicians in the world, but between them they have an impeachment(one of only 2 in U.S. history) and a spectacular failure in an election that she thought she had a divine right to. How many other new standards are you going to come up with to determine the outcome? It doesn’t matterhow many counties Obama lost in Kentucky or WV for that matter. Likewise the overall popular vote is irrelevant. It’s DELEGATES, stupid! If you don’t like the system then try to Obama-proof it in 2012. Your candidate lost because she thought she could deliver a knockout on Feb. 5 and even now her strategy is that an act of God will take Obama out!! Stop being a crybaby and a sore loser.

Posted by: toast | May 21, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

The biggest winners in Affirmative Action have always been white women…yet the folks who only see things in black and white always pin their misery on the handiest scapegoat. This time it’s Affirmative Action….right on schedule. Good to know those folks are still so predictable.

Posted by: Lee-Usa | May 21, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

In your dreams, pt. On to the convention to seat Florida and Michigan, as they voted.
If the SD’s still want to go with Obama at that point, Obama’s delegate lead from black and red states instead of Hillary’s popular vote lead from bue and red states, that’s fine, but we won’t be joining you. Be a major exit from the Dem Party where you guys can start anew, starting with the traditional Democratic defeat in November.
The day we vote in Chicago machine Marxists into the White House is a day that won’t happen.
Now, by the same token, I also realize that Obama supporters aren’t going to vote with us for Hillary, so I’m basically writing off the Democratic Party as viable. We’ll have to have a moderate third party where Clinton Dems and Reagan Dems and independents can select a candidate that can win.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 21, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

In your dreams, pt. On to the convention to seat Florida and Michigan, as they voted.
If the SD’s still want to go with Obama at that point, Obama’s delegate lead from black and red states instead of Hillary’s popular vote lead from bue and swing states, that’s fine, but we won’t be joining you. Be a major exit from the Dem Party where you guys can start anew, starting with the traditional Democratic defeat in November.
The day we vote in Chicago machine Marxists into the White House is a day that won’t happen.
Now, by the same token, I also realize that Obama supporters aren’t going to vote with us for Hillary, so I’m basically writing off the Democratic Party as viable. We’ll have to have a moderate third party where Clinton Dems and Reagan Dems and independents can select a candidate that can win.
Hillary ’08

Posted by: rd | May 21, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

On radio stations across the country tonight two speeches by Obama are being played.
May 18, 2008 where he says that “Iran is a “tiny” country and is no threat to the US”.
May 19, 2008 where he states “So, I’ve made it clear for years that the threat from Iran is grave”.
I guess we have to have this man even if his character is flawed because he is black and if we do not vote him in we will be called racists.

Posted by: Anne | May 21, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

kerry,
we obviously have different issues that we vote on. there is a lot of slime out there on each of the candidates. i vote my paycheck and ability to provide for my family. none of the issues you mentioned affect my household income.
i try not to discriminate against people based on what church they go to or their religious beliefs. i don’t believe wright’s words were racist — almost every word i heard was true. regarding the stock, unless obama broke a securities law, his trading is irrelevant.
i could smear clinton, too, but i’ve gotta go. thanks for your reasons. i now know more today than yesterday.
Obama ’08!

Posted by: Hope | May 21, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

“The biggest winners in Affirmative Action have always been white women” Yep, it’s still a mystery to me how half the people in America got themselves labelled a “minority”

Posted by: Cartier boy | May 21, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

(referring to all women, not just white women, although they were the biggest winners)

Posted by: Cartier boy | May 21, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

mhhunt …Under an Obama Presidency there will be even more breaks for ONLY the black people. If you read his books you will find out that he hates white people and that he only wants black people to count. His mentor Wright would tell you that. Why would Obama belong to a church that believes in black theology? Read that theory sometime. This country will end up in a civil war with him at the helm. There are many blacks that are so much better than Obama and they do not feel hatred toward whites as he does. He even threw his grandmother under the bus. He thinks more of Wright than he does ofc her. Wright even told you at that he would be back. They had that little charade to stop all the talk about Wright so that Obama could win the Presidency and fool the American people. Wright said Barack has to say what he does because he is a politician. He said I’m telling you the truth as a Pastor. Notice Wright has made himself scarce to allow that talk to die down. It was all a show for Obama to get the whole incident dropped.
It has worked for the fools.

Posted by: carolyn | May 21, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I feel like Iam going trough a divorce and were fighting for the kids and it is going to go on for years and right now I am still in the rage mode the spite mode is when I punch the Mccain botton for president we were set up by dean and gang the media was harsh to Hillary and now all the women backing her are really pissed.

Posted by: Bishop | May 21, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

This is an interesting concept. People are not put off by Obama, but Obama represents and reminds them of what Affirmative action has done to white people. Interesting.

Posted by: ChayaFradle | May 21, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Pelosi said on PBS this afternoon news,
that the votes do not count on primaries
and caucuses,only delegates.
Really?????????????????
If my vote doesn’t count,then what’s
the purpose of voting?????I don’t get it
Pelosi……..
I wonder why after 7 pm on primaries in my home state
blacks flooded the precincts to be
a delegate.
I went to be a delegate for Hillary but it was
impossible to get in.Fight broke out
with blacks and i left.Hillary won the
popular vote but
Obama got more delegates……..
Fraud,Fraud,Fraud…….
My pledge to DNC.I will not vote
democrat if Obama is on the ticket
…..and millions like me.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 21, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

I think webb is full of crap also these people in WV, KY, Pa it is women voting for hIllary just like AA are for Obama it is women voting for Hillary and the DNC can’t come to grips with the fact that we want Hillary as much as they want Obama any thing else is just bs IMO

Posted by: Bishop | May 21, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

ChayaFradle, unfortunately it’s not iteresting, it’s crap. It’s yet another race card, the only thing we get from Obamanuts.
rd

Posted by: rd | May 21, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Talking about affirmative action, we might as well introduce affirmative action in presidential election. Just as they do in college admission, a black candidate only needs 40% of votes versus 60% for a white candidate.

Posted by: Panabiker | May 21, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Patriot – Hey I admire your passion but trust me, the world will not end if McCain is president. Your own candidate accuses the others of fear mongering and that’s what you are doing. Relax, take a deep breath. You make some good points and then you ruin them with all the other ranting. Washington isn’t going to “change” – not with Clinton, or Obama or McCain. That’s not pessimism, just reality.

Posted by: druggstohr | May 21, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Patriot
states you listed most of them are red states.BHO will never win those states. You may say African Americans will turn in huge number, don’t forget white will also turn in huge number and vote against this teleprompter reader.

Posted by: Tony | May 21, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

I think KY and WV are just common sense people who tell people the way it is and the way it is….CLINTON. I think if Obama were white, they still wouldn’t vote for him. They don’t know him and what they do know they don’t like. Anti Hillary people are the same way.

Posted by: Darla | May 21, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Hussein is a joke.
Hussein is fake.
Primaries and caucuses are fraud.
I pledge to DNC i will not vote
democrat if Hussein is on the ticket.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 21, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Leroy:
you doth protest too much. more white people vote for Obama than black people, more white people vote for him than don’t. Some who don’t vote for him don’t like his politics. Some think he isn’t experienced enough. Some prefer other candidates for reasons that have nothing to do with Obama, per se. Some people won’t vote for a person of a different race, no matter what their resume or politics. I’d think of those people as narrow minded and short sighted. This article is not about racism. Webb actually argued that white people in appalachia who so far are not voting in large numbers for Obama are not doing so out of racism. Webb argues that they don’t know Obama as well as they know the Clinton brand name. He also argues that Obama can win these voters over, by addressing their economic concerns and spending time in the region making his case.
Obama is not a racist and his supporters by and large are not racists.They are Americans who think the country is going in the wrong direction and needs a change in the way its politics work.

Posted by: Irene | May 21, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

who the hell cares about race? He and Wright and Farrakan and Ayers are Marxist. Nobody but some freakin liberal would vote for him if no matter what his heritage is.
We don’t want no stinkin anti-Americans from Chicago Black Liberation Theology.
The word black is in there, but that’s what the theology is. We don’t want no part of this gang, screw the race crap.

Posted by: rd | May 21, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

OMENTUM/…. YEAH RIGHT LIKE I BELIEVE YOU ARE AN AFRICAN/AMERICAN. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS? “Ya’ll is mad stupid”.

Posted by: FLORIDA BABY! | May 21, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

druggstohr
| May 21, 2008 9:31:46 PM
American is ‘changing’ right before your eyes!
Like the disbelieving Clintons, you are asleep. lol
And the comment about the rising 1.3 BILLION Chinese has nothing to do with fear mongering.
The Chinese are not to be feared.
However, many Americans like to be on top of the world.
And there is no way to be on top of the world with substandard education, shattered economy, too many wasteful wars, etc.
American badly needs a ‘change’ of direction. The American dream is fading. America needs an intelligent leader with vision, Barack Obama.

Posted by: Patriot | May 21, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

tim wise “whites got affirmative actions in the usa for 300 years”

Posted by: luqman muhammed | May 21, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

The Truth is Out There: Many Blacks ‘came’ to this country long before the descendents of White immigrants – in chains packed like logs in slave ships! They were auctioned off like cattle. They made tobacco and cotton plantation owners filthy rich. This nearly 68 year old white LOL has now read all of the virulent racism that I can handle for tonight – direct descendents of the pure White Mayflower descendents must be posting here since nobody else is complaining. Would you have welcomed the half-White/half-Black child Obama into your home to play. No. Too black for you. And, how dare you connect Mein Kampf by Hitler who used it to slaughter six million Jews plus six million others who disagreed with his ideals. I was raised in England under Hitler’s bombs and his V-Rockets. I lived the nightmare you are so casually tossing out. Or, maybe you agree with the Iranian President that the Holocaust is all a big lie? He is thumbing his nose at us. Bomb Iran? Watch every American in Iraq be slaughtered by their brother Iraqui Shia Muslims. Our President and Cabinet did not have a clue that religious and tribal ties in that part of the world count for far more than geographical boundaries. Nazism is dead. May US racism follow Nazism and its pure Aryan race hate mongering if we as a Nation are to be the moral leader in the World – in another generation or so maybe. Bush just came back with an empty begging bowl from Saudi Arabia because we have lost our prestige.

Posted by: KiwiTricia | May 21, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Do any of you “educated” Obama supporters know the history of Appalachia or anything at all about Appalachian culture? Is John Gaventa’s Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley still required reading in college? If not, how about Daniel Elazar’s American Federalism? The people stereotyping Appalachians without knowing a thing about them or there history are just like the people who stereotyped Reverend Wright and his church without knowing a thing about it or its history.
Try looking at http://academic.regis.edu/jriley/421elazar.htm for an explanation of why the results in KY and OR are so different.

Posted by: jyllne | May 21, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

“… the biggest group beneficiary of affirmative action are white women.”
And this must be the reason why women are still making 70% of men’s wages.
Hadn’t thought I would ever agree with sen. Webb but I believe he’s right on the affirmative action.
It’s time for change.. It’s time to protect an individual, every individual, not a group.

Posted by: magda | May 21, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Obama won all delegates by fraud.
In states with only caucuses blacks
and activists flooded the precincts
to be a delegate.Whites didn’t get any
change.
The whole process is fraud.
My pledge to DNC.
If Hussein Obama is on the ticket,
I WILL NOT vote democrat.

Posted by: Nicholas | May 21, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Women are considered minorities for affirmative action programs because affirmative action was originally meant to level the playing field for groups that have traditionally been discriminated against. Women were considered property of their husbands long after slavery ended. Women were given the legal right to vote long after African American men. Women have throughout history been paid less than men and denied promotions because they are not considered primary breadwinners.
Every effort is made to ensure that the benefits of affirmative action are given first to black males, then to black females, then to other minorities, before they are opened to white women. The fact that white women have received a disproprotionate amount of benefits from this program is because not enough people from other disadvantated groups have applied for them.
In other words, white women have gotten off their lazy behinds and worked hard to better their lives — and they have been so successful at it that the young, educated 20 somethings don’t even know how hard women have had it over the years.

Posted by: jlynne | May 21, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Over half of U.S. prisoners are black and hispanic and the vast majority of CEOs are white. Thats the real “affirmative action” at work. Until we whites recognize how our status is built on de facto hiring preferences and social and cultural advantages we will continue to “blame the victims” of our unhappy system.

Posted by: Mark from Atlanta | May 21, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Hussein Obama is an empty suit ,And will do nothing. He will never be president.He is not electable.

Posted by: Moe | May 21, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Affirmative action has always been irreparably flawed. Rather than a system based on merit, skill, or accomplishment, affirmative action is based exclusively on biological characteristics.
The original premise was good- that a system needed to be created to provide opportunities for individuals who had previously been denied entrée to those opportunities. The resultant practice of affirmative action, however, became unconditional entitlement for specific individuals based on biology (in most cases, race). Biological entitlement became a substitute and a replacement for merit, skill, and accomplishment, which is why the system of affirmative action is so profoundly flawed. The current system disadvantages other, and in some cases, more qualified individuals who don’t meet the biological requirements of affirmative action.
Rather than initiate a more equitable system that includes biological factors as well as requisite skills and accomplishments, affirmative action in it’s current flawed form remains the standard in virtually every public and private institution.
This presidential race is no exception. Rather than nominate the Democratic candidate with the necessary experience and skills, biology takes precedence. As in the affirmative action tradition, “hope ‘n change” has become more important than demonstrated legislative, administrative, and foreign policy acumen.

Posted by: Emily | May 21, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

It’s not an issue of black vs. white, it’s the rich against the poor. And don’t you forget it. Children of alumni get preferences, children of wealth get preferences (Bush, McCain, Gore ring a bell) It’s not soely just about race, it’s about the fact that there has been regions of this country that have been forgotten and left behind for a generation economically. You can’t ask a person who lives on food stamps to understand or relate to Obama’s background. And they’re voting for Arkansas Bill more than Illinois Hilliary. If it was Hilliary Rodham on the ticket, she wouldn’t even win her home state. Let’s at least be intellectually honest. The middle class has been wiped out and the higher class of the college educated, and people of wealth, besides the minorites relate to Obama. While Hillary gets the benefit of the doubt and picks up Bill’s receptive audience. It’s not racism. It’s the same old tried and true “idenity politics” that it has always been. Only now with a woman and a minority, it gets packaged as a gender/race battle, which it really isn’t. Black voters voted for white canidates their whole lives, do we really have to claim racist completely when they choose Obama? women haven’t voted for a women before, does that make them racists/sexists for voting for Hilliary? As for McCain, he’s running as a continuation of the most unpopular President in history. I don’t think it’s just about age. So let’s be just a little more honest about what were seeing and talking about here. It’s not just about what you see on the tv screen.

Posted by: blog | May 21, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Patriot
You have to be a closet Hillary supporter with all that arrant nonsense about Harvard-educated Obama sorting us out with the 1.3 billion Chinese.
Mr Affirmative Action couldn’t even get the number of states in the union correct; also, he was waffling on recently about transferring arabic translators from Iraq to Afghanistan. Duh.
And, yes, I’ve had my PhD for decades.

Posted by: Marty | May 21, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Affirmative Action should either be totally abolished, or applied to the NBA and NFL.

Posted by: MentalDisorder | May 21, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

You are right, blog. As a masters degree educated poor white Irish trash from Boston, I stand in no better stead, in fact, let me correct that, I am looked upon as a Wigger when I apply for a job. Any black person who can spell their name gets a job over a white guy like me. In fact, being a bit over 50 now, I might as well be dead for all the hiring managers who’ll look at my resume. BTW, seen Affirmative Action in action ALL my life from high school in Boston in the 60s thru college, the USAF, IBM, NASA and more an lemme tell you, it’s one of the reasons the country has slipped way down from when we led the world. You cant keep giving the best jobs and school placements to the morons and expect to excel. Been there. Seen it. It’s a fact. Oh and obama scares the living cr*p out of me. SOme of you will love that. You are fools. Here’s an idea – seek out Russian immigrants to this country. Ask them if THEY support obama. They know a freaking commie when they see one, though they probably wont recognize a black racist as easy as say I can. But that’s what obama is a black racist commie. No less, maybe more.

Posted by: JFK | May 21, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

I’m against affirmative action. I thought we were supposed to judge people based on merit and not skin color?
Instead of looking at a person’s accomplishments and achievements, why do we look at whether they are black or white to boost them?
Affirmative action IS favoritism based on skin color.
Why aren’t black people opposed to this? You can’t have your cake and eat it too.

Posted by: Mike | May 21, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

IT ISNT OBAMA SUPPORTERS WHO YELL RACISM ITS THE EXIT POLLS , THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED HILLARY WHO SAY THEY VOTED AGAINST HIM BECAUSE OF RACE…
ITS NOT ALL PEOPLE THAT VOTE HILLARY ITS MOST IF NOT ALL THE PEOPLE THAT WOULD FALL TO MCCAIN IF THEY CANT GET HILLARY. PREJUDICE IF NOT RACISM..
THOSE WHO ARE EASILY CONVINCED THAT ANY RUMOR ABOUT A BLACK MAN IS ENOUGH TO NOT TRUST HIM.. HE IS MUSLIM ANTI-AMERICAN ECT. WE ALL KNOW FOR A FACT THAT IF ANYONE HAD TRIED TO PIN EITHER ONE OF THOSE RUMORS ON MCCAIN OR HILLARY THEY WOULD HAVE LAUGHED.. IT DOESNT TAKE TOO MANY BRAIN CELLS TO FIGURE OUT WHY!

Posted by: melissa | May 21, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

I like Jesse Jackson. I would vote for Jesse Jackson. He’s a stand up guy committed to the working class.
I do not like Barack Obama. I would not vote for Barack Obama. He is an arrogant guy with no commitment to the working class.
I like Hillary Clinton. I would vote for Hillary Clinton. She is a stand up woman that is committed to the working class.
I don’t like Ralph Nader but I would vote for Ralph Nader. He’s a repugnant guy that is committed to the consumer.
Call it what you like, I call it Democracy!
========================================
Hillary in 2008

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | May 21, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

she wasnt trying to change the way the democrats win the nomonee when her husband was the winner! isnt it her that said a win is a win?
she has to play by the rules even if they dont work in her favore unless she wants the same boycott she is trying to give obama..

Posted by: melissa | May 21, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

If Hillary does not receive the nod, I will vote for McCain.
According to melissa’s post @11:38, that means I’m a racist. It also means that every person who voted for Hillary is a racist. Sounds like the “brain cell” problem belongs to melissa.

Posted by: Emily | May 21, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Patriot, on the morning of Nov. 5th that so-called blowout list of yours is going to meet reality in the form of something called 270 votes in the Electoral College. Hint: it’s how the U.S. elects Presidents.
For previews of this coming attraction, check here
http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Obama/Maps/May21.html
and here
http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Clinton/Maps/May21.html

Posted by: abehn | May 21, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

So, Emily: I assume that means that you are not voting based on policy issues…because Hillary and Barack agree a lot more than Hillary and McCain do.

Posted by: Justme | May 21, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Clint Eastwood says he admires Hillary–her grit for staying in the fight. Now, he is being accused of being a racist for not including blacks in his war movies.
How long has it been since Flags of my Father came out–long enough for people to complain if they had a legitimate gripe?
Christ, how much longer do blacks think they can attack everything not-black before there is a backlash? If the people in KY and WV do oppose affirmative action, maybe they have a good reason for it.
I know I mediated a case where a woman was fired because she complained that she had to do all the work in the department while the blacks sat there and did their nails–when she asked them to carry their weight they told her they didn’t have to because they were a protecdted class. The employer didn’t deny that happened–they just said that they could fire her for complaining about that because it wasn’t racist or sexist for doing so. But that didn’t stop then for paying off the white woman to go away.

Posted by: jlynne | May 21, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Wrong, Justme. I’m voting on the candidates ability to make informed decisions, and the candidate that has demonstrated good judgment. Policy issues notwithstanding, Obama’s judgment is abysmal. I’ll provide further evidence, if you like.

Posted by: Emily | May 21, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

What a lot of angry, suspicious, paranoid people! Dennis

Posted by: Dennis Millett | May 21, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

i dont like obama i will never vote for him ill vote for mcCain first. and im a racist too i guess!!!!!!!!

Posted by: delite820 | May 21, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Policy reasons this Hillary supporter will vote for John McCain instead of Barack Obama:
1) I do not support legalizing marijuana or consider the war on drugs unnecessary
2) I am pro-choice but only in limited instances (health of the mother–including mental health–and birth defects) not pro-infantcide (requiring a doctor to allow a healthy child who survives an abortion procedure–be it RU0-486 or a surgical proceudre–to die rather than provide the newborn medical care
3) I own a handgun and oppose implementation of the UN Milenium Standards that are part of the Obama Global Anti-Poverty Bill
4) I know that universal healthcare will have to come from Congress not from the Whitehouse
5) John McCain has signaled that he is going to end the war but will leave troops in Iraq … Obama has said he will end the war and station troops in Kuwait … they few miles difference don’t make that much difference to me
Personal reasons that I will not vote for Barack Obama:
1) No one goes to a church for 20 years unless he believes what the preacher is saying or he is using his “church” for other purposes, i.e. you don’t go to a Catholic Church every week then claim not to be a Catholic
2) No one associates with characters like William Ayers and his wife Bernadette and Jodie Evans unless he or she shares some of their views
3) “Or else” what? Michelle is on the campaign trail. She says verying ugly and mean things about the U.S. but she is supposed to be off limits?
4) News reports tonight indicate that an Obama delegate went on Syrian TV and said very negative things abotu America and Americans
I think what many liberals don’t realize is that when you take the person in the middle out (Hillary) people don’t have to move to the left. They can and often do move to the right–especially if the liberals are putting forth policy positions that they consider unconscionable.

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Posted by: Lee-Usa | May 21, 2008 8:59:13 PM
The biggest winners in Affirmative Action have always been white women…
Where in the world did that come from? I am a white woman and over the course of 25 years of my life I was many times turned down for grants, scholorships and loans for school because they would be given to minorities first.

Posted by: michiganian33 | May 22, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

The benefits of affirmative action are typically measured across time–during the 70s white women were big beneficiaries because they were the ones leading the charge for equality and were unqiuely situated to take advantage of the new laws when they were enacted. Since the 80s, very few affirmative action benefits have gone to white women but since we grabbed over 80% of the benefits in the 70s it will take some time to bring the % downs. Plus, so long as the promoters of affirmative action can say that the intended beneficiaries haven’t been helped enough, they can get more $$$ for their programs.

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

jlynne I have some questions/comments:
1) What does the Anti-Poverty Bill have to do with handguns? This bill received bipartisan support in the senate and house–so, if you blame it on Obama’s poor judgment..it seems that you need to extend that blame to Congress.
2) You say that universal healthcare will have to come from Congress not from the White House….The Clintons blame the republicans for not approving health legislation when Bill was president. So, are you telling me that she couldn’t get it passed when her husband was President…but she’s going to be able to get it passed when she’s president? Are the republicans not going to exist?
2) Obama does not support legalizing marijuana…he supports legalizing medical marijuana with strict guidelines. He sees no difference between it and morphine for reducing pain. Also, it has been shown to help many illnesses–including multiple sclerosis–something I suffer from. I am not interested in using medical marijuana…but if it works best…than I am for supporting whatever works best.

Posted by: Justme | May 22, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Mr. Webb speaks and writes well, from extensive knowledge and experience, but he is inaccurate when he speaks of antipathy of affirmative action as the real motivator here. Racism is alive and well particularly in rural America. The more sedentary the more bigoted one is. That’s my perception. I’m voting for Obama. Heck, I’ll cut his grass and weed his flower beds.

Posted by: Doug | May 22, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

With only 5% among black votes in some places, what can any candidate expect?

Posted by: Aliou FL | May 22, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Also, jlynne–about this whole Ayers guy….they both were professors at the University of Chicago…Ayers is a distinguished professor. Obama thought he was an English professor–but he’s not…he teaches education reform.
Not only that, they both served on a board to help underprivileged people. Obama served from 1993 to 2002. Ayers was appointed by the Mayor of Chicago to the board in 1999.
Obama is not endorsing terrorists by serving on a board to help disadvantaged people that a former radical was appointed to. He’s endorsing helping disadvantaged people.

Posted by: Justme | May 22, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

This may come as a complete surprise to some of you Obamabots, but people can have their racism and although you’d like to outlaw it, there is nothing you can do about it.
Try this though. Try nominating a more conservative black and you’d see a huge difference.
These rural people don’t want a far leftwing radical black president. And they shouldn’t. And thank God we won’t have one in November.

Posted by: Jo | May 22, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Let me make a prediction: IF Dems are not careful, they are going to lose this election because hillary is forcing them to take Black votes for granted.
I heard a speech today that made me shake my head: Black will never vote republican.
REally? Yes they can and or they can stay home and let whites do their thing if come down to it.
If Obama is not nominated, not only will blacks stay home or vote for Mcwar, Many white people will do the same. This thing about black and white that Hillary and the media is injecting into the race is a disgusting and damaging piece of sht.

Posted by: Aliou FL | May 22, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Obama seems to have no problem surrounding himself with people who literally hate this country with a passion.
And most Americans find something deplorable about that.
Nominate Barack for president of something to do with the United Nations – they hate America too. He’ll feel perfectly at home.
But there is no way in hell that man is going to set foot in the oval office as the leader of this great country. Period.

Posted by: Jo | May 22, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Sorry for the delay … my comment got flagged for possible spam … it may post eventually.
I will try to make this one short so it will post.
1) Here is a link where Obama says he has always supported decriminalizing marijuana: http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080131/NATIon/896961936/1001
2) I don’t think Hillary or Obama could get universal healthcare through Congress. Hillary’s plan had a better chance of passage because it was more targeted and based on an existing program but the advantage was so small its hardly worth mentioning.
3) People disagree on what the Global Anti-Poverty bill does. However, it does include a proposal to adopt the U.N. Millenium standards which include a ban on all small arms. This wouldn’t trouble me as much if Obama’s campaign had not filled out a position questionnaire saying that he supported banning all handguns. This wouldn’t bother me as much if he hadn’t advocated a gun ban as a method to stop the violence against school children in Chicago.

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Justme:
For the record, Obama has been personal friends with Weathermen domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn for years. Obama served with Ayers as co-director of the Woods Fund. Obama has also been personal friends and dinner buddies with Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) member, Rashid Khalidi for many years. 
Khaldi is well known for his anti-Israeli sentiments. He has also hosted political fundraisers for Obama. Obama, while serving as co-director of the Woods Fund with his other buddy, Weatherman domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, helped Khalidi secure $40,000 in 2001 and 35,000 in 2002 to fund the anti-Israel oriented Arab American Action Network which Khalidi co-founded. The Woods Fund is the board you said in your post helps “underprivileged people.” These “underprivileged people” are anti-Israeli extremists.
Do some real homework, rather than touting your brand of Obama fantasy.
And, just so you know, since the presidential race commenced, Obama has distanced himself from his longtime friend, Khalidi. When interviewed by the LA Times, Khalidi indicated that Obama’s recent support of Israel rather than Palestine is the result of his bid for the presidency. Sound familiar? Rev. Wright said the same thing about Obama- that he distances himself from his mentors and friends for political expediency.
Ayers and Obama live in the same neighborhood, as does Farrakhan and Khalidi. Obama launched his campaign on Ayers doorstep.

Posted by: Emily | May 22, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

It’s not hard when you see the people of color pitted against the hispanics. The women pitted against the men. And the white against the black. We are being systematically balkanized from the inside out. Bilinguial education isn’t assimilation, it’s balkanization. Those who break the law to emigrate here aren’t asked to know english, the laws, or even how our banks work. It’s a system committed on having you dependent on government or having something you earned taken from you if your not. People have nothing against those who emigrate to the US legally, they have a problem and resent those who come through illegially, and get benefits that legal residents have to pay for. Free health care means cost go up and hospitals close. Somebody always has to pay. And as long as we are allowed to take from others, while allowing those who recieve to not identify with their adopted country and live off the fruits of other peoples labor, that resentment will continue. And it’s not fair to every side. The problem is not immigration, it’s the amount of illegal immigration that is choking our system. Social security is about to go bankrupt, so what do they do, give it to illegal immigrants. Yeah, that’ll will make it really last now, won’t it. The government is robbing from you to give to others and those who recieve it are just as angry and resentful of those they got it from. Yet government is rewarded every year, and gets bigger and bigger; While more jobs are offshored to the third world and developing world thanks to increasing health care and labor costs. Our financial system is on the brink of collapse, our borders (in this era of “terrorism”) are left unsecured and those who would secure them are bogged down, overseas, unable to defend US; and we are fiscally as well are at our breaking point creating more ineffective and unfuded mandates that we can’t afford. (like oh, the war on invisible “terror”) And yet the solution is always more government, and more military spending. Why can’t we get a shot at running things in the states and decide what priorities need our attention. Why is Washington always given the benefit of the doubt, when clearly they can’t manage it. Why are we looking to get help from Washington when they clearly don’t have our best interests at heart and turn a blind eye to the needs and wants of our own communities. Is it too much to ask to vote out these ineffective and unresponsive incumbents instead of reward them every two to four or six years for putting us in this mess. It’s time to say NO to this type of insanity and hold these people accountable for their actions. From the President on down. Until we take it that seriously, we don’t deserve to whine about how they aren’t listening to us. Clearly if we don’t tell them what we want, others will gladly take our place. It’s time to make our elected officals fear US for a change, rather than not getting the latest big illegal contribution from yet another big corporation looking for another taxpayer subsidy. How in the hell can that be considered “free market”. Folks, until we reject politcs as usual, they will continue to divide and conquer us… While we fuss over someones gender, age or race, and not their policy that is opposed to our own best interest. Stop blaming each other and punish those responsible. Until you do you will continue to have plenty to complain about… but at least your have CNN and FOX news to watch when you get home from your second job.

Posted by: blog | May 22, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Here are just a couple of links re: my post about Ayers, Khalidi, and Obama.

Posted by: Emily | May 22, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Opps… Here are the links:
Links:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obamamideast10apr10,0,2195251.story
htpp://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageld=57231

Posted by: Emily | May 22, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

You make absolutely no sense, RC.
Not surprising, considering who you’re supporting for the Democratic nom.

Posted by: Emily | May 22, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Emily,
Your fear mongering did not work in 32 states including 90% white states like Iowa, OR, WA, WI and it will not work in GE either! Do you got brain to make any sense of these?
You think people of those 32 states stupid to believe your nonsense? Do not under estimate the power of 17+ millions voters with your Dark Heart!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!

Posted by: RC | May 22, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Obama started out appealing to a broad spectrum of Americans. Unfortunately as the campaign progressed, through his own miscues, he allowed himself to be pegged into certain demographic ruts.
He can bring in the young, the affluent, the highly educated and African-Americans. He will never recoup the broad swath of working class America. Thanks to Rev. Wright, “bitter” and “clinging” and perceptions of anti-Americanism and elitism he’s looking more and more like an African-American John Kerry. The media largely falls within his favorable demographic and continues to hype him but the votes don’t lie. Even the tone of this piece is blaming the voters not the candidate for his inability to attract them.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 22, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

hopesprings52,
OBAMA is running for President of the USA not North Korea where 100% people have to vote for one person! He will win by winning majority of the vote not 100% of the vote or delegates, that is normal for the President of USA!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!

Posted by: RC | May 22, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

RC:
You apparently can’t or won’t collect any actual data about your Messiah. If, even fractionally, you used critical thinking skills to conduct some real research, you’d learn something relevant about Obama. His bad judgment, dubious friends and associates, and his machinated political ascendency make him a very scary person. I don’t expect you to understand what I’m saying here because it’s obviously beyond your depth.

Posted by: Emily | May 22, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

RC,
Obama has not won the majority of the white vote since the Reverend Wright story broke. If you discount all the primaries that occured before the Reverend Wright story, Hillary is winning hands down. If you discount the popular vote from the city of Chicago and exclude both Florida and Michigan, Hillary is winning hands down. The most recent polls show Hillary winning in VA, NC, and MO–states that Obama carried handily. Oregon should have been a walk-away for Obama but it wasn’t. Its the rock bands opening for him–not Obama–drawing the huge crowds. As it stands now, Obama will limp into the convention with a majority of the pledged delegates but no clear mandate — not a great showing before the general election. The majority of people do not understand the delegate system or care about it. All they will “know” is that Hillary won the popular vote but lost the nomination — the same as Al Gore.
The problem is Barack Obama can’t win the working class vote and Hillary Clinton can’t win the African American vote. The party is split in half which means if John McCain can mobilize the Republican base he will win. Reverend Wright will mobilize the Republican base for McCain–while conservatives like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Karl Rove and Laura Ingram have all said they have a new respect for Hillary. The Obama supporters have substantially lowered her negatives — who would have ever expected that?

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

The working class is and always has been the heart and soul of the Democratic Party. No Dem can win the presidency without connecting with the average Joe. When Republicans win it’s because they succeed in convincing the average Joe that the Dems have lost touch with their concerns and look down on them. Haven’t Dems been there and done that enough times already? The Dem Party of my father found its strength in honest, working class values. The Party shoud not be hijacked by limousine liberals and arrogant media pundits.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 22, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

We have bigger problems than which of the current crop of political idiots manages to steal the Presidency. There is no one alive who will save us from what the near future has in store for all of us. The human race has only one hope and that is for every single human to start working together to save what is left of the only home any of us will ever have.
There is no one out there to save us but ourselves.

Posted by: end game | May 22, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Reverend Wright will mobilize the Republican base for McCain–while conservatives like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly, Karl Rove and Laura Ingram have all said they have a new respect for Hillary
———————————-
Yes becoz Karl Rove knows, when it is OBAMA vs McCain, all those blue states and red states will become OBAMA states in the fall. So are trying their hearts out for Hillary! You can fall in their trap not smart Dems. Who the hel@ cares what Karl Roves says or do? when he did anything good for America anyway, specially for Dem party! He is a political criminal who got us into a messy war with billions of dollars debt and thousands of dead soilders! Wake up before it is too late Hillary Supports!!
Go Dem party!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
(NC for Hillary..lol..RC from NC..was not able to get a OBAMA event ticket after 2 hours of ticket give away, talk about popularity of OBAMA in NC)! Please don’t give me those stupid poll numbers of NC to me again. People of NC have already spoken for OBAMA!!

Posted by: RC | May 22, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Obama is creepy.

Posted by: Kitty | May 22, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Yeah count those Florida and Michigan and you will still lose becoz after only 70 delegates you will be in the history book!
Hillary said, Nov 07, FL & MI will not count, not losing she is for them! Flip-flopping!
Obama did not make the rules, rules where there before the election started, why the change of heart now? becoz Hillary is almost 200 delegates behind.
If you do not understand delegate count, either move to another country or take a political science class 101. Don’t be cry babay becoz Hillary lost! In an election someone wins and someone don’t it does not mean that you have to bad mouth about your opponent, it only shows how mature your mind is to accept the reality!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!

Posted by: RC | May 22, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

RC,
Turning red states blue would be inconsistent with over 200 years of American political history. That would also be inconsistent with everything we know about sociology, psychology, and behavior economics.
That’s why McCain has a lead in the electoral college now and that is why he has a good chance of winning the general election.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Obama/Maps/May21.html
I think I heard the latest poll results on Hannity and Colmes. I will see if I can find a link.

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Why do people use the race card whenever Obama loses? Does that apply to California, New York, Florida, Pennsylania? His biggest problem are the iny league idiots who put spin on everthing. He is a puppet for the elite. We need someone real. That is Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: kelly | May 22, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

It is so easy to tell when someone changes their user name then continues to spew the same Obamit Vomit.
We didn’t buy it before we aren’t buying now.

Posted by: Vickie | May 22, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

I watch every channel–the important news is the 5% of the information they disagree on. Those are the issues I research for myself. I think Obama could win Colorado and possibly Iowa. He will not win North Carolina or Missouri–they have a traditionalistic political culture that opposes change. His chances in Virginia depend greatly on the VP choices but I think Obama is to liberal to flip this predominantly pro-life state. The 16 electoral college votes he gains in CO and IA do not offset the 27 he loses in Florida and certainly don’t offset the 31 additional electoral college votes from states that Hillary can carry but he can’t–WV, OH, and AR.

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Iam tired of all these black people threatening to stay home if Barrack Hussien Obama is not nominated.I am a Hillary supporter and would gladly pay $10 a gallon for gasoline than vote for Obama.What is Obama going to do?How many oil fields does he own?You Obama supporters are all idiots.Ask your selves if you will belong to a church for 20 years unless you agree with every thing that is done or said in that church.

Posted by: Iffymens | May 22, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

CAN YOU IMAGINE MICHELLE OBAMA AS THE FIRST LADY OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY? HAVEN FORBID.

Posted by: Iffymens | May 22, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

<>
“Yep, it’s still a mystery to me how half the people in America got themselves labelled a ‘minority’”….uh….they didn’t.
Affirmative Action was designed to give those citizens who were historically shut out of the workplace a foot in the door. It wasn’t about minorities per se.

Posted by: Lee-Usa | May 22, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

If Michelle Obama were so gracious, why would Barack Obama be so worried about the Republicans playing clips of her speeches? Gracious women do not say things like “Americans are mean” or that “they are proud of their country for the first time.” Gracious people never have to worry about “being taken out of context.”

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am

Obama CHOSE to go to a black liberation theology church. All sermons would have been along the same theme. It’s very separatist. All the “I wasn’t there” excuses for Rev. Wright don’t hold water because the whole worldview of a black seperatist church is offensive to most people.
Obama has no excuse. Rev. Wright was right about ONE thing….Obama says what he has to say to get elected.

Posted by: Jo | May 22, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Justme,
I agree–it would be very unbecoming of Barack if he did not stick up for his wife. If she were gracious he would not have to stick up for her. If he wants to compare himself to JFK, then she will be compared to Jackie. I can’t think of many women who could live up to that standard. Unfortunately, she is more like Hillary Clinton (when she was first lady) than anyone else. No wonder she hates her so much.

Posted by: jlynne | May 22, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

People not voting for Obama has nothing to do with race.
It is the Fact he will not beat McCain and would not make a Good President… Period.
It is another time Obama uses his Blame game. Trying to win votes due to this.
If 92% of Blacks can vote for him, with over half of them knowing he is not right for the job. Just voting for the race issue. Then your racist are in that section of the voting public. Plus this country is in serious trouble due to that.
This country needs a Darn Good President Right now. Not unchartered waters to go blindly sailing into never never land. which is what Obama is.
Only a fool would buy into it, and jump on that bandwagon.
Vote for America, which is a vote against Obama.

Posted by: seah | May 22, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

the fact that hillary,farrahaa,and carvelle still see obama as a black man,and not a man tells you we have not come far enough in amercia..like it or not rev wright spoke a lot of truth,and if amercia was far,equal and just you would not need a rev wright

Posted by: johnn | May 22, 2008, 4:44 am 4:44 am

I like Obama and I broadly agree with Senator Webb’s sentiments…I tend not to see racism when I do not get my way…I see I ought to do better…does it mean some are not racist? Of course…but not dwelling on it means it does not stop me…I will always meet 20k reasonable people for every mean one…Obama needs to address the issues of that constituent in a language that they understand and appreciate…which I agree he does not do too well sometimes..call a spade a spade

Posted by: krispin | May 22, 2008, 5:23 am 5:23 am

This is so predictable. I said months ago that the “people in charge” are putting obama in Office to abolish affirmative action. And here comes the news commentaries on it. I suspect the argument will be, that if a black man can become president, then there is no more need for it.
From the beginning, Obama has been the nominee. The DNC (which i consider part of the government) has taken steps to keep the Clintons down. “Rules” that take out certain state’s votes and not others (there were 5 states that broke those rules, but they only punished 2. Furthermore, the Credentials Commitee can change the rules at anytime they see fit–those are the “rules”. So this “changing the rules” bit is totally within her right to do so by their own parties rules.

Posted by: Darryl | May 22, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am

I hope that soon black people will realize that that empty suit Obama is in it for himself.The man is arrogant beyond belief and allows himself to be compared to MLK and that annoys me to no end.What has this man ever done for black people and his people are quick to accuse people of racism even when you call him by his given name which is Barrack Hussein Obama.What is he trying to hide?

Posted by: Iffymens | May 22, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

Obama is a constitution lawyer. who talked about re-writing the constitution in college days.
Obama’s main claims is to change Government.
He has never gave any details or showed any plans, Just that is his main goal to change government.
His Religion, who he has made know is very much a part of him. States that one goal is to redistribute power Of this country and redistribute wealth of this country.
That is in the doctrine to his religion.
Those are two personal goals Obama has.
and has made know. That he will change government, and that his religion is very much a part of him.
To hand over the Supreme power of this country to a man who has those two goals in his life, is sheer insanity.
Anyone voting for him is doing just that.
Of the skeptics will say oh he won’t do that. He will probably say Oh, I would not do that. He has lied to the American people in the recent past. So he is very capable and able to do it again, and will.
I love United States of American. I want to see it be around for a long long time.
I will not take a change or gamble on This countries future, with someone who has other goals for it.
If you love your country, you will say no to Obama.

Posted by: seah | May 22, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

BO & his wife were afforded the luxury of 230 points added to their SAT because of AA to get into an Ivy League school. I didn’t get that luxury. Maybe that’s why I didn’t get in. I wouldn’t be so proud if I were them. It pretty much points out that you must be to dumb that you need to be given the extra 230 points before you even take the SAT!!

Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 22, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

the Obama networks are busy this morning. GMA (ABC) very first report was one bashing McCain. Robin Obama Roberts first words were how McCain’s “spiritual” advisor a evangalical minister named Parsley said some nasty things about Islam. the other obama network (NBC) did a long segment on how Obama ia a great person, he just needs to get his message across. No mention of wright, ayers, dorhn, farrakhan, ben laudin, etc. etc. McCain should demand equal time. these people make no attempt to get the facts accurate or be fair. they are also feeling sorry for Teddy Kennedy. Did these people feel sorry for Mary Jo when the coward ran away and left her to die?

Posted by: Russ | May 22, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

NEWS FLASH, ABC , NBC, CBS, OBAMA HITS FLORIDA TO WOOO HARDWORKING MIDDLE CLASS WHITE PEOPLE. TOLD TO TALK UP HIS BACKGROUND. LOL HES JUST LIKE THEM. LOL .
Why would he want them. they have been referred to as uneducated racists by the news networks and obamaites.
Clinton talks facts and is shot down. awwwwwwwwww the double standard and the news. Obama and the news organizations are hypocrites.
Thank you abc for putting Jim Webb on the back pages. We wouldn’t want the AP and Hillary’s observations verified.

Posted by: Really | May 22, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

Obama’s cover up about his church will stay with him as the truth is out. I’m more concerned now with his recent statements on May 18, 2008 that Iran is a “tiny” nation and not a threat to American and on May 19, that Iran is a “grave” threat to America and I’ve always told you this. This man is so inconsistent—are these going to be the new standards of America!

Posted by: Anne | May 22, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Obama has run the dirtiest campaign than anyone. Although with his woe is me and angelic act, tried to portray himself as a nice guy.
With all the woe is me, whinnying and look they are picking on me. Was nauseating. So many fell for it. Because he used his blame game, to blame everyone for everything under the sun. Trying to make himself look better, and take eyes off him.
What a loser and woooise.
He voted over 100 times Present, because he did not have the guts to take a stand on an issue. He was afraid to vote yes or no on most major issues.
Or perhaps that no one could blame him for anything. Like he was doing to them. worthless as a senator, not doing the job he was paid to. He left the people down. Shame on Obama.
Obama used you for a vote. He will let you down as he has a history of doing.
He says what you want to hear, He promises everyone everything. He has so many beleiving he cares about just them. that he will help them. Impossible to all for everyone. Any one with common sense knows that.
You have been taken for a ride, and feel for a scam artist.

Posted by: seah | May 22, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Just to inform people affirmative action affects a very low percentage of Americans. Even if they did away with it for lower class whites it will have zero effect on your lives and is a non issue. Mr. Webb is unjustly trying to tie affirmative action on Obama back as if he was the cause. Senator Clinton supported it too so why has that not been tied to her back , for some reason everything seems to end up in Obama lap as if he was the reason. People this will more than likely have zero to no effect and trust me without it you would see an extremely low percentage of blacks in certain schools and jobs and I am sure that you all new its true.

Posted by: emyers | May 22, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Hey Leroy, AA have voted for a white male as POTUS every election. And Hillary was getting a good share of the AA vote in the polls before Bill opened his yap back in SC.

Posted by: Craig | May 22, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

This video clip will be interesting and will definitely have an effect on voters support. I agree, I think Michelle Obama is a liability for Barack and the GOP will stop at nothing, like you said, in finding past video clips and documentation of her prejudice against white people. The onslaught of this by the GOP will be overwhelming. This is going to be interesting and we thought the battle between Clinton and Obama was fierce, I’m afraid we haven’t seen anything yet!

Posted by: david in texas | May 22, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

OBAMA’S WINS CAME FROM RED STATES..SEN. CLINTON’S WINS CAME FROM DEMS AND RED STATES..THIS IS WHY OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE BECAUSE THOSE STATES HE SAID HE WON WILL NOT WIN THEM IN GENERAL ELECTION.
SPEAKING OF RACE ISSUES…
OBAMA HAS BEEN GETTING AN AVERAGE OF 85 PERCENT OF AA VOTES AND YET THEY DON’T CALL IT A RACE ISSUE.
MEANWHILE, CLINTON HAS BEEN WINNING WHITE VOTER’S BY AN AVERAGE OF 60 PERCENT AND THEY CALL IT RACISM?
THAT’S WHY DEMS WILL LOSE AGAIN BECAUSE THEIR BOY OBAMA SMELLS LIKE MCGOVERN, GORE AND KERRY ABOUT TO REPEAT..

Posted by: jamesr,Independent,PR | May 22, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

guess Webb is out as a VP.
:0

Posted by: trettin | May 22, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

I am sure if the RepubLosers had any dirt on Senator Obama and/or his wife it would be out there already.
Politically this is the time they are working to frame the public view of Senator Obama that they would like.
What better time than now.
Please ignore all these shrill voices from Repugnants who are pretending to be supporters of Senator Clinton.
They are not Democrats.
No TRUE DEMOCRAT would be willing to destroy the Democratic Party because their candidate lost.
I personally wouldn’t.

Posted by: Steve_NJ | May 22, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Steve_NJ you need to understand that they do have dirt, it is a gaurantee but they can not use it now. They have to wait until closer to the GE because the BO spin doctors would have way too much time to do damage control. It is way too earliy in the process!

Posted by: rockthebleachers | May 22, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Blacks always vote for a Democrat, so their support of Obama means nothing different during the election and no loss for Republicans. Democrats care noting of black’s concerns since they know they have their vote. Republicans know that no matter how much they do for blacks, they will never get their vote, so why do anything for them?
Blacks will never have political clout until they split their vote between the two parties. When that happens, both parties would have to vie for their vote. Blacks do not have the education level to know that, or it would be happening today.

Posted by: Joyce | May 22, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

As ethnically diverse as American has come to be has, in my mind, made affirmative action a waste of time and effort. Our constitution allows for the PURSUIT of happiness and wealth…..it does not guarantee it based on ethnic origin.
I don’t think the people of WV and KY voted for HRC because BHO was black, but because she was more familiar to them, being like them.
I think racism is dormant in each of us, but really isn’t a factor until one lives in an area where he is in a minority. Living in such an environment brings out the latent racism (read different-ism). Birds of a feather flock together for a reason.
Yes, slavery was wrong, but it’s over. But to expect anyone, educated or not, to feel comfortable with someone who is very different from them is expecting too much from any living creature.
Let’s get over it, stop yelling at each other. And count the d**n votes, for the majority should always rule.
What you have or where you go in this world is a result of your effort and is your choice. THAT IS AMERICA. I don’t think we want it any other way.

Posted by: dotindixie | May 22, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I, too, didn’t know that Obama supported affirmative action for poor white people as well. This is interesting. I also didn’t know that he felt affluent African-American’s should not be included in affirmative action. I think this is very interesting and an issue that should be brought to the forefront. I’m a Clinton supporter, but I feel Obama is right on target on this concept. I’m curious to see how the media spins this issue.

Posted by: david in texas | May 22, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Some oppo-research team has determined that Web’s public statements on Affirmative Action need to be “clarified” now to immunize him against attacks if he were to be on the ticket.
We are only months away from the claim that a discussion about Webb’s position is already “old news”, has been “exhaustively considered” and presents “no incompatibility with a President Barack Obama”.
The chess pieces are getting into position.

Posted by: gorgon '08 | May 22, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

If Obama is pitted against McCain a War Hero, he will create a backlash among MC supporters just as he did with Hillary’s and will lose the vote for the second time in this election. Hillary kicks Obama’s and McCain’s bottoms on policy and plans. Hillary will wipe out McCain in debates just as she did Obama. Hillary is the ONE!

Posted by: irma | May 22, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

If you all paid attention to the policy in the last debate…he said that Affirmative Action should be class based. He is the ONLY one who can do it and I will bet you all that it will be done…

Posted by: Beka13 | May 22, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

The problem is no one thought his message of CHANGE would be heard by so many Americans. He has rung a bell that can not be unrung people are tired of Washington politics and living at or below the poverty line.
I want my grand kids to have a good future and I am voting for OBAMA because I believe he is sincere. I am willing to trust the future of my grand kids on it.
I know a 3rd Bush term would be the worst thing that could happen to this country.

Posted by: Lou | May 22, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

I hope Obama wins then black ppl will see that they can achieve anything if they work hard. They have someone to look up to.
With an Obama win, black ppl can not demand for affirmative actions or special privileges in schools, work, or any place that requires a brain and some hard work to earn a good living.
With an Obama win, black people can not behave as they are now. Always whinin’ and bitchin’ if they can not win a competition when brain is required not brawn.
With an Obama win, black students should have no more excuses for falling behind school: http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_9103842?IADID=Search-www.mercurynews.com-www.mercurynews.com&IADID=Search-www.mercurynews.com-www.mercurynews.com

Posted by: zak | June 4, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.