Jun 10, 2008 8:01pm

Bush Tells British Paper He Regrets War Legacy

ABC News’ Tahman Bradley Reports: Across the pond for a Europe farewell tour, President Bush spoke candidly about his legacy, acknowledging mistakes in handling the Iraq war. Bush told the British newspaper, The Times, he regrets the bitter division over the Iraq war and — rather remarkably — admitted his words in the lead up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq did not help unite the country behind the effort.

The paper writes that the president "expressed regret at the bitter divisions over the war and said that he was troubled about how his country had been misunderstood."

Bush told the paper, "I think that in retrospect I could have used a different tone, a different rhetoric." Bush also admitted that some of his strong phrases like "bring them on" or in general his "Cowboy Talk" — as he once referred to it in an ABC News’ interview with George Stephanopoulos — affected the perception of the U.S. around the world. Those phrases, Bush said, according to the paper," indicated to people that I was, you know not a man of peace."

Read the complete "Times" story HERE.

On presidential politics, as he has done before, Bush acknowledged to the Times that Sen. Barack Obama’s nomination for president by the Democratic Party is statement of how far American has come. Warm feeling aside, Bush subtly went after Obama on trade. The Illinois Senator supports renegotiating NAFTA and opposes free trade agreements with Colombia and Korea.

Said Bush,"There is concern about protectionism and economic nationalism. " He added,"Leaders recognize now is the time to get ahead of this issue before it becomes engrained in the political systems of our respective countries." Bush also shared concern that Obama would be soft in challenging Iran’s nuclear ambitions

User Comments

Acknowledging mistakes in handling the Iraq war? You mean like starting it in the first place?

Posted by: Paul | June 10, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Kevin – you advocate us invading every country that isn’t run by “a great man who should stay in power?”
I think that’s nuts.
That aside, I do think we’d be better off with Hussein still there. It certainly would be costing less American lives and dollars – and that used to be the bottom line for conservatives with regard to foreign policy, back when people knew what the word conservative means.

Posted by: Paul | June 10, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

And let’s not forget that while Hussein was a brutal two-bit dictator, he was “our” brutal two-bit dictator.
The whole Iraq mess we now find ourselves in really started the morning when Hussein opened his newspaper over coffee and realized his “friends” were selling arms to his wartime enemies.
We started losing our hold on him that morning.

Posted by: Paul | June 10, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

But the real question is why are Republicans so scared of two-bit dictators?
Its a dangerous world. It always has been, and it always will be. Granted, weapons of mass destruction up the ante some, but still, cowardice isn’t part of the American character.
You guys are like the wimpy townsfolk in a Western movie, trying to hire a gunslinger to slay the local badman.

Posted by: Paul | June 10, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

WBush has made several mistakes in his 2 terms, McSame wanted to continue the same approach, therefore if America has to get back its leadership in the world and get back its economic prosperity then there is only one choice: Obama

Posted by: BKMC | June 10, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Wow. For a moment i almost felt sorry for the guy. But then I remembered the graveness of his mistakes. His war of choice based on distorted intelligence. His embrace of torture, his spitting on international law and human rights. He has poured enough gasoline on the anti-american hate-fire to make it last another generation.
Such a pity when you know how great America CAN be.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | June 10, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Since the war is partially responsible for driving up gas prices, destroying our reputation around the world, making us less safe, and wreaking havoc on our economy, increasing Iranian power in the middle east, shouldn’t Bush just admit that the war was a bad move?

Posted by: Huh | June 10, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Yeah, Bushie, we don’t care for your vacations, your lies, or your double-talk. We are swimming in debt, the economy is on the rocks, you have done nothing to help prepare our Nation for the energy crunch in which we find ourselves, and what are you doing? Taking a vacation in Europe, trying to bolster YOUR legacy. We don’t give two hoots about your legacy. It is irrelevent.

Posted by: therockofages | June 10, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Rhetoric is not the issue here. We are talking about deceiving the country into waging a war for oil. God help those who still believe that we went in there to restore democracy.

Posted by: worldsam | June 10, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

david g, we … the world wasn’t leaving Saddam alone.

Posted by: newz4i | June 10, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Hating … disliking Bush and supporting our troops … the two are not synonymous.

Posted by: newz4i | June 10, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Cowboy Bush+Cheney spun the media into war, talk big on opposing global warming so he + Cheney can get rich in oil. He must be so proud and sleep well at night knowingly the economy in shambles and US soldiers are dying in Iraq on his watch. I pity the next President of USA. Is going to be John McBush or Barack Obama?

Posted by: John Lee | June 10, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

All of a sudden he is worried his legacy. It’s too late it is what it is and is bad! You are going down as the worst president of the US ever! Pretty bad when you are worse than Jimmy Carter.

Posted by: rockthebleachers | June 10, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

“He Regrets War Legacy”, we regret ever having heard of him.

Posted by: JR | June 10, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

His regret was not 4,000 american lives or the suffering and death and destruction of millions of Iraqis.
His regrets were that he should have used a “different rhetoric” to sell the war, and he feels sorry for himself that he is percieved as “not a man of peace”.
IMPEACH THIS CRIMINAL!!!

Posted by: CMB | June 10, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

It’s interesting that he won’t say these admissions when he’s home in the US.

Posted by: Don | June 10, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Bush looks increasingly aged and elderly and out of touch.

Posted by: Danny | June 10, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

FreaknHotNBoston: Even know these laws exist in this country…there are millions of homes still in the US that have lead paint on their walls, pealing and waiting for unsuspecting kids to eat. Even if you don’t hear about it, I am sure there is some form of environmental disaster lurking just around the corner. Just because we have these laws doesn’t mean we are protected, because it requires each individual to follow said laws. As it was stated before, our greatest asset is individualism, which in turn will be our biggest downfall.

Posted by: crazy_delco | June 10, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Greg–There is no impeachment movement in Congress, that is why its not news. Pelosi herself stated there would be no action taken on Congressman K’s attempt to impeach Bush and any suggestion has been quashed.

Posted by: Morreijac | June 10, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

It is funny how Bill Clinton nearly got impeached for having sex with an intern in the White House but not impeach a president who’s war is causing an economic downturn in the U.S. and also the lives of soldiers who were told to fight a country who “had” weapons of mass destruction.

Posted by: Chris | June 10, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

unfortunately, if bush changed his rhetoric he still would have lied and pushed through his illegal policies and fake war based on lies… his ‘tone’ reflected his decisions… this is just plain ol’ fact, so what bush is saying today is just more crap… all he’s admitting to was not being nicer about how he lied!

Posted by: earthisnotflat | June 10, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Obama wants to bring “hope” and “change” to America because he and his far left America hating buddies of long standing think America is a bad place and needs to be changed into their utopian vision of a socialist society. A socialist society of less prosperity for all, more hate and rage against America and the traditional values of the middle class, and an America that has replaced the stars and stripes with the white flag of defeat, been disarmed and rendered helpless to defend herself or her allies against attack.OBAMA: “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,” Obama said.”That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen,” he added, if that’s the type of “change you can believe in” and YOU WANT TO BRING PROSPERITY DOWN A NOTCH OR TWO, AND TRIIPLE GAS AND FOOD COSTS vote Obama. OBAMA: “ White folks greed runs a world in needs” Sounds a lot like the Black liberation theology teachings of the Rev. Wright’s(“God D### America”) Trinty chruch that Obama was a member of for twenty years. If that’s the type of “change you can belive in” and you want MORE RACIST, ANTI-SEMITIC AND HATE AMERICA TRUE BELIEVERS AND THEIR ILK IN THE SEATS OF POWER IN GOVERNMENT RUNNING YOUR LIVES AND DESTROYING THE TRADITIONAL VALUES OF THE MIDDLE CLASS INCLUDING: FREE SPEECH AND THE “RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS” vote ObamaOBAMA: “Iran Does Not Impose a Threat to the US” and wants to help pay for his top heavy and corrupt government boondoggles by disarming the military If that’s the type of “change you can believe in” and you want AN AMERICA THAT HAS REPLACED THE STARS AND STRIPES WITH THE WHITE FLAG OF DEFEAT , BEEN DISARMED AND RENDERED HELPLESS TO DEFEND HERSELF AGAINST ATTACK , vote Obama

Posted by: Tim | June 10, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Why a vote for Obama may lead to more war and deaths, not less. If Obama had got his way and Saddam was still in power the West would be dealing with TWO major middle eastern powers on the brink or aleady in possesion of nuclear weapons and thumbing their nose at the US. The facts on the ground now in Iraq is that the surge has been successful and the US is winning the war in Iraq. That is why Obama’s plan of pulling defeat out of the jaws of victory in Iraq is so idiotic. Al Qaeda is on the run in Iraq but if the USA retreats and turns Iraq over to them, Al Qaeda will have access to Iraq’s large oil reserves and thus the means and opportunity to attack us and attack us hard. Our Middle Eastern allies will have no reason to trust our word and abandon us. Not to mention the boost a withdrawal from Iraq will give to Iran, Syria and Hamas. Think WWIII, Obama and his supporters scoff at the threat Al Qaeda and the rest of their ilk poses to the security of the US and future of the Western World, If Obama is elected his defeatist policies will put us all at more risk of another 9/11 attack and even worse the blow up the middle east which will mean more will die, just like what happened in WWII when people thought Hitler could be appeased and were wrong, very wrong. Whats more, the killing fields of cambodia could be played out again in Iraq by Al Qaeda, Only this time the people murdered could be the very people that risked their lives to support the US. Question, if Obama wins,can you sleep well at night if you get what you want and this happens? I hope not.

Posted by: Shelly | June 10, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

President Bush did not lie about the reasons behind invading Iraq. Every intelligence agency in the world thought Saddam had WMDs. Records from Saddam’s files now show Saddam’s Generals even believed Saddam had WMDs. The US is winning in Iraq and if Obama has his way and pulls the US troops out of Iraq, their comrades will have given their lives for nothing and the lives of the people of Iraq who risked their lives to support the US will be in be at risk.

Posted by: Mary | June 10, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

earthisnotflat, the reason gas prices have increased is because of the Dems like you who refuse to allow oil companies to drill for oil here on our own soil and to build new refineries. In case you you are not aware of it, President Bush has been trying for the last 8 years to get congress to approve drilling of oil here and the building of new refineries and the Dems have blocked it. So do not blame President Bush for higher gas prices place the blame where it belongs on the heads of the Democrats. Again, if Obama and the Democrats get their way and tax the oil companies even higher like Carter did during his term, look for even higher prices and long lines at gas stations. Thats the type of “change you can believe in” if you vote for Obama.

Posted by: Tim | June 10, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

earthisnotflat, Even the French think the US is winning in Iraq and have reaffirmed their commitment to Iraq.
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said on Sunday that the security situation in Iraq was improving and reaffirmed France’s willingness to help rebuild the war-ravaged country.
“I have the feeling that things are better. Statistics show a drop in security incidents,” Kouchner told AFP after a working lunch with his Iraqi counterpart Hoshyar Zebari on the last day of his two-day visit to Iraq.

Posted by: Mary | June 10, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

tim – that is not true… drilling for oil in the US is not going to make a dent in oil prices… this is fact admitted by the oil companies themselves… all that will do by drilling will be destroy even more valuable natural resourse (believe it or not, we need a green earth to live on… have you heard of global warming?) and even more importantly, we need to develop a whole new mindset to combat the oil problem, develop other sources for energy and transportation that are not so inefficient… but that is beyond the older crowd who can’t deal with necessary changes… unfortunately for people like you, life will move forward… either get out of the way if you can’t lend a hand or pitch in and face the facts that things DO have to change

Posted by: earthisnotflat | June 10, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

if saddam was still in power, iran woudl be balanced out, 4000+ americans woudlbe alive, we wouldn’t have this spiraling debt, hence teh dollar woudl not have fallen, hence gas wouldbe still be cheap and we’d all be a lot better off.

Posted by: hotNBoston | June 10, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

That means he wishes he would have told us a different lie about why we should go in. He is still not sorry for lying. He has not begun to regret it yet. Wait till he is out and people say goodbye to the worst president in history. He will be another Nixon.

Posted by: ken | June 10, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

but the french are not bringing more troops… every major country in the world has pulled out of iraq… why? face it… it’s a failed endeavor and we need to admit our mistake and CORRECT it, not just push forward more blindly using our children as pawns to SAVE FACE… what an embarassment! no wonder bush is ‘apologizing’ for his ‘rhetoric’… (an empty but revealing comment)… what france is willing to do is what EVERY country including the democrats would be willing to do … REBUILD a country we have destroyed… we owe it to the iraqis!… but not until we end our illegal military occupation and let the iraqis sort things out… believe it or not, the overwhelming majority (poll after unreported poll show) that the majority of iraqi citizens want the US military OUT

Posted by: earthisnotflat | June 10, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

tim and mary are now the 20% minority who still are too scared to admit that they have been lied to… bush has created the overwhelming instability in the mideast, and THAT is what is driving up oil prices, plus the worthless dollar that he has destroyed, and add to that his lack of international competence leading to people laughing at us as being country bumpkins… what a shame to see people still defend this idiot

Posted by: earthisnotflat | June 10, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Blind faith.
I guess Obama was right, when he describe Americans as being lost, needing someone to care and listen to them.
“It seems to me that each day, thousands of Americans are going about their lives – dropping the kids off at school, driving to work, shopping at the mall, trying to stay on their diets, trying to kick a cigarette habit – and they’re coming to the realization that something is missing. They’re deciding that their work, their possessions, their diversions, their sheer busyness, is not enough.
They want a sense of purpose, a narrative arc to their lives. They’re looking to relieve a chronic loneliness. And so they need an assurance that somebody out there cares about them, is listening to them – that they are not just destined to travel down that long road toward nothingness. And this restlessness – this search for meaning”
Obama is using you.
Maybe you do not realize that today. One day you will.
He has used so many things to work your minds. You do not see it now, but one day you will.

Posted by: seah | June 10, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

anyone who supports Bush any further is no better than he is..why would any american support this miserable little tyrant for one minute more?.

Posted by: Ramage | June 10, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

…..And the world is way better without Saddam – the Iraqis are prospering, the entire Middle East is engulfed in peace and the US is pumping oil as much she wants! Uh….paradise!

Posted by: bear | June 10, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Bush is telling a BRITISH newspaper that he made mistakes? How about telling the American public and APOLOGIZING to the mothers and wives of all the dead soldiers and those with broken bodies or PTSD for the rest of their lives. He makes me want to vomit!
Hey George. It’s TOO LATE. You’ve left this mess to Obama. You ought to be ashamed of what you’ve done to this nation.

Posted by: sedonakaren | June 10, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Just a comment to Terry up there.
Technically Hawaii might not be a state of the United States of America, but when everyone believes something is true, IT IS TRUE. I have never heard of 49 states of America, only 50 states of america.

Posted by: yong | June 10, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

earthisnotflat, If Saddam was still in power, as Obama wanted, the world could very well be dealing with TWO nuclear powers in the middle east thumbing their nose at the US, the UN and the West. And what would Obama do, “Oh please don[t bomb us or give your nukes to Al Qaeda just let me know what you want.” Obama’s idea of dealing with enemies who want to destroy us is “talk is precious action is cheap”. Again, in case you are ignorant of history, Obama tactics pf using mere talk when dealing with an avowed enemy who wants to kill has never worked. Please don’t tell me that it is President Bush’s fault that Iran hates the US. Iran started their hatred of the US during the Carter Presidency when American hostages were held and Carter’s idea, similar to Obama, of talk talk talk, did not work. It took the threat of serious action from President Reagan to make Iran finally release the US hostages. Obama sounds a lot like Carter. During Carter’s four years of Presidency Carter/Obama decimated the military, made enemies like Iran disrespect and hate the US, raised taxes to the hilt, sky rocketed the deficit, raised inflation and interest rates to the hilt, raised gas prices, etc. etc. etc. If you want a replay of the Carter Presidency and the type of “change you can believe in” vote Obama.

Posted by: Tim | June 10, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

“So, in the end you have to ask yourself’ Do I feel lucky today?”
Who do you think the Taliban would want for president?

Posted by: Hikoushi | June 10, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

When was the last time planes were hijacked, embassies bombed, American civilians killed overseas??

Posted by: 20202 | June 10, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

bear, actually Iraq is pumping more oil now , the surge is working and the middle east is becoming much more stabilized. I know this must make you sad. I know that you want Obama to raise the white flag of defeat in Iraq and let Al Qaeda and Iran have their way with Iraq so they can have all of Iraq’s oil so they can use it to provide the means to attack the US making another 9/11 more likely. Oh I forgot you may also be sad that the US has not had another 9/11 and that is why you are supporting Obama. oh my.

Posted by: Jimmy | June 10, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

America is not misunderstood. Bush is understood for what he is, the new Hitler misleading his country into invading a country. America does not support Bush in Iraq. America does support the troops. To bad military victory does not equal moral victory.

Posted by: riddelup | June 10, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Not everyone posting on this board is an American so take it with a grain of salt if it’s way out in left field.

Posted by: 20202 | June 10, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

riddelup, a moral victory is Iraq means keeping our word to the Iraqi people who risked their lives to stand by the US. A moral victory in Iraq means stabilizing Iraq after the havoc of Saddam and the invasion of the US by making sure that Iran and Al Qaeda do not take Iraq over and use the oil of Iraq to spread havoc across the Middle East and beyond, maybe to your home town. A moral victory in Iraq means making sure the lives of American troops lost in Iraq were not lost in vain.

Posted by: Sam | June 10, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Mr. Coffee, Saddam was in contact with Al Qaeda prior to the war and if Iraq had not been invaded, the consensus of many is that Saddam would have pursued further contacts with Al Qaeda and who knows what may have evolved. The fact Al Qaeda has marshaled their resources in an attempt to defeat the US in Iraq is a good thing. I shudder to think what Al Qaeda would be up to if they were not being confronted by the US in Iraq. Another 9/11?
Iran and Iraq both with nukes would most certainly be something the US and the West would be facing now if the US had not invaded Iraq. Also, the fact that the US is now in Iraq and thus a threat to Iran is a good thing. Again think where the US and the West would be with no base of operations in Iraq and dealing with TWO major middle eastern powers with nukes, not to mention the treat Al Qaeda would still be.
Again, a moral victory is Iraq means keeping our word to the Iraqi people who risked their lives to stand by the US., A moral victory in Iraq means stabilizing Iraq after the havoc of Saddam and the invasion of the US by making sure that Iran and Al Qaeda do not take Iraq over and use the oil of Iraq to spread havoc across the Middle East and beyond, maybe to your home town. A moral victory in Iraq means making sure the lives of American troops lost in Iraq were not lost in vain. Finally, and most importantly, a moral victory in Iraq means making sure the killing fields of Cambodia are not played out again in Iraq by Al Qaeda. , Only this time the people murdered could be the very people that risked their lives to support the US. Question, Mr. Coffee, if Obama wins can you sleep well at night if you get what you want and this happens? I hope not.

Posted by: Tim | June 11, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Bush really thought he could end this war in 3 to 4 weeks, he never consider that it would last as long as it did. Rumsfeldt would not lesten to the milarty that was telling him he need more troops. Had Bush let the UN inspectors complete their work he would have been informed that there was no WMD, but that was exceptable he wanted the war, he wanted to be a war President and he wanted to take out Sadam because of his dad. He alone brought shame to this countries reputation with the world, only England believed Bush, the rest of the world did not believe he had WMD’s they believe the inspectors and their reports which Bush and buddies ridiculde. Bush should have stayed and cleaned out Afganhstan instead that is were the really emeny lies, but no they don’t have oil and if you don’t understand how much this has to do with oil you are just as clueless as Bush wants you to be. Drilling in Alaska won’t solve anything, there is not enought oil there. Oil compies do not want to build refinieres because of cost and how long it takes to be profitable, oil men are all to close to their retirements to care.

Posted by: Bridget | June 11, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

All the liberal cowards in here need to shutup. The Democrats will never get the White House back because they’re fake. Keep whining ladies.
McCain ’08

Posted by: Ryan | June 11, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

The Truth is out There, Do you think Obama would be any better than President Bush on illegal immigration? I think not. In fact Obama would be far worse. Don’t even think about a fence and as to divers licenses for illegals, Obama is for it. At least, McCain is for a fence and will not go forward with amnesty until he get some sort of consensus from his base. With Obama, all of his base want open borders full speed ahead. Yikkes

Posted by: jim | June 11, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

I cannot understand why the only country to ever use nuclear weapons on human beings, the only country that has military bases, some 740, all around the globe, the country that launches “premtive strikes” against other nations, of course, all the while refering to them as evil, should also be the country that gets to decide who can and who cannot have nuclear capabilities. If you are a history buff, the similarities to the USA today, and Nazi Germany in the 1930′s is frightening. Don’t be a bit surprised if we, along with Israel, launch an attack on Iran. This is the only way the neocons will have a prayer on getting another Bush/McSame in office.

Posted by: Spirit Rebel | June 11, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

It’s sad that he’s finally reaching this conclusion….I believe that Bush was an inexperienced man whose charisma not credentials put him in the Whitehouse. He followed the illadvised policies of the Neo-cons like Cheney and the political hacks like Rove.
He is not evil, but he has left us with an evil war.
That being said I was always anti-war and that does not qualify me to be president.
Obama has followed the religious and political beliefs of a series of “kingmaker” mentors like Rezko and Wright and Pfleger. Perhaps he has been looking for a father figure all these years. At any rate, he is more like Bush than McCain…
McCain 08

Posted by: Jackie | June 11, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Ramage, about your post on 11:11:36 PM, good question and I’m glad you asked it. Why would any American support Bush? It makes me think more critically about the people we live with. Bush somehow got the votes of lots of Americans. Bad move, America.
Two factors that contributed to this are 1) Americans’ lack of worldly education and 2) too many Americans’ false sense of morality.
Start with the first: I believe education encourages us to get to know and understand other people better. If fear of the unknown is real, then learning about and understanding people of other countries, religions and cultures would leave America as a whole less fearful of the rest of the world. Bush played much on the fears of Americans. The more educated of the world Americans become, the less susceptible they will be to supporting policies of war and torture out of fear.
My second point has a fit with the word “ideology.” Republican morality works like belonging to a clique. It values support of some in-crowd over support of humanity and conscience. Republican morality is exclusive: you must support what they preach or they’ll brand you as evil. Republican morality parades to tunes like “Onward Christian Soldiers, marching as to war.” What a stirring tune!
Question: How dare I question the ideals in that hymn?
Answer: That is exactly my point. If parading to Republican morality causes the deaths of half a million civilians, we should question it very hard.
Morality isn’t owned by America, or by Republicans, Christians, Muslims or me. Consider all those hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians that died, or lost children or parents: Do you think most of them got up in the morning with plans to praise the devil? I doubt it. I think they got up in the morning to love their children, take care of their families, work, and go to worship. Republican morality, or any morality, that supported the Bush war should have tried a lot harder to consider choices besides war. America had a lot of support around the world before 9/11, and could have used it to fight our attackers in lots of ways other than with bombs.

Posted by: Brian | June 11, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

I see that all the America haters are also Bush haters. I know that it makes a lot of you sad that the surge is working in Iraq and Al Qaeda is on the run. All you Bush/America haters seem to think that Iraq and the Middle East would be better off with Saddam still in power, terrorizing and murdering his people. Iraq, thanks to the US and the brave people of Iraq, now have a chance to free themselves from tyranny and live in freedom. That is why Iran and Al Qaeda are so intent on defeating the US in Iraq as they know that if Iraq is a success their evil regimes and tyrannical creeds will be threatened. As to the the role of the US in the world, think where the world would be if the US had not stood up and Hitler or the Soviet Union and Hitler or the Soviet Union had prevailed. Now another war is being fought. The war against extremist Islam Think where the world will be if the US does not stand up and fight against this new threat as Obama is proposing. Think.

Posted by: Tim | June 11, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

THIS WOULD MEAN THAT MCCAIN IS THE LAST PERSON ON PLANET WHO DOESN’T REGRET SENDING YOUNG AMERICANS TO UNECESSARY WAR??? HUMMMM ….

Posted by: Mark Webb | June 11, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

It will be a long time before our country recovers from the effects of this war. The lives of the families of fallen soldiers will never be what it once was. How are we going to repay the debt owed to these families? We have so many things to worry about but already some of us are willing to vote for Mr.McCain. Those who voted for this war do not deserve our vote. Throw them out of office regardless of party affiliation. We need to clean house and start afresh. No more room for war mongers and those who usurp power by using scare tactics. Let us reclaim our country and restore it at its rightful place.

Posted by: worldsam | June 11, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

To suggest that something might be considered (without giving details) is not a backtrack. When determining economic policy it is natural to leave everything on the table…….Obama is recommending that the tax be implemented….this is what he wants to do….When Carter tried it it was a disaster.
The story should really be that Obama is developing policy around a debate gaffe again….
Jake
You saw the debate. Do you think Obama knew what he was talking about or the ramifications to raising capital gains tax?
That’s the story. You have a candidate who talks off the top of his head about meeting with terrorists with no preconditions….kind of tries to take it back…then goes on the stump and advocates the position….now is changing it.
This is the same way his stance on capital gains taxes was developed.
God help us all.

Posted by: Jackie | June 11, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

The dems/libs were wrong about Reagan, and they’re wrong about Bush.
Watching them eat crow about the GOP presidents they love to hate is always so sweet.

Posted by: Beth | June 11, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Gee
They still keep saying that everyone went along with this War – Yet, Obama spoke up (even though it was a major Political risk to do so), people lost jobs (like Bill Maher and a few Reporters the questioned the buildup to the War) and all the other Countries that agreed that there were WMD’s based on info from Curveball (the guy the Germans and French repeatedly said was a complete liar) proved incompetent.

Posted by: BretC | June 11, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Gman, You keep going back to the reasons behind invading Iraq. If Saddam had adhered to UN resolution 1441 the US would not have invaded Iraq. Documents secured from Saddam now show that Saddam had every intention of restarting his WMD program as he did not think the US would invade him. So sooner or later, the world would have had to face up to the immediate threat Saddam posed to the world. Post 9/11, the US decided it would not wait and be attacked by a known enemy of the West. An enemy who cheered 9/11 , provided aid to Hamas , and who every intelligence agency reported had WMDs. Thus Iraq was invaded. If Obama had got his way and Saddam was still in power the West would be dealing with TWO major middle eastern powers on the brink or already in possession of nuclear weapons.
I know you will never agree with the above reasons of why Iraq was invaded. So be it. The real issue we are dealing with now is not the why. The issue now is what the consequences to the people of Iraq, the middle east, the US and the West would be if the US waves the white flag of defeat and retreats from Iraq as Obama is proposing. Would Iran and Al Qaeda cease the opportunity to invade Iraq, take over Iraq’s oil and further their plans of mayhem in the Middle East, the US and the West? Would the people of Iraq lives be at risk who risked their lives to support the US? Also, since a lot of you people seem to think the price of oil is high now, would an unstable Iraq under the thumb of Iran and Al Qaeda cause oil prices to go even higher? Consequences are important and if Obama has his way and retreats from Iraq the consequences could be very bad indeed.

Posted by: Terry | June 11, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

BretC, Bill Maher did not lose his job because he questioned the war. No reporter lost their jobs in fact most of them got promotions. Obama was not brave for opposing the war. Obama was not even in the US Senate at the time and was speaking to the choir to his very leftist constituents. What is very troubling to me is that all this talk from Obama of retreating from Iraq is emboldening the enemy and causing more US troops and Iraqi people to be killed and none of you boneheads seem to care about that. Think what would have happened in WWII if the media and prominent politicians like Obama had been so god awful negative about the war. A lot more lives were lost during WWII and I think that the US may have been very well defeated by Hitler with the same type of media and anti-war politicians we have like Obama running around.

Posted by: Gary | June 11, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Bush has 5 more months to complete the destruction of America..He will do all he can during these 5 months to complete this task..Him and Cheney set out on this course 7 1/2 years ago and he is not finished yet…Expect him to bomb Iran before November. He is a war monger and a war criminal. The worst president ever in the history of this country.

Posted by: lucky | June 11, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

I think one of the failures of the Clinton administration was his inability to root out Al Qaeda.
Now all the liberals want to just take all the troops home and we shall have bliss on a silver platter.
Not that these idiots wont attack us unprovoked again like they did on 9/11.
No. We can just bring all the troops home and wait for another attack.
Better yet, we can go SCOLD rogue leaders in person, and they will SHIVER in fright.
Or best of all, APPEASE THEM privately while looking strong publically.
Thats not change you can believe in.

Posted by: tomdavie | June 11, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

America and the world would have been 1000% better off if we had never heard the name Bush and that goes for the old man and junior alike. They are a criminal family just like the Mafia. They have done every thing possible to destroy this country.Junior has suceeded where the old man left off. In the next 6 months he will bomb Iran and get the country into still another war.He is a war monger.And him and daddy are making millions off the war.

Posted by: lucky | June 11, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

Actually it was no regret for the war, only his cowboy behavior. He dodged the issue. His cowboy persona is what started the war, and not his cowboy rhetoric. 4,000 plus wonderful Americans are dead because of his lies and his cowboy rhetoric, thousands and thousands of Iraqis are dead because of his cowboy rhetoric. All of these charges are true and they more correctly tell the story of his original sin of telling a lie to get us into this despicable war. His words of regret do not tell the true situation regarding the Iraq war story. Scottie has told that and I say, “God bless you, Scott McClellan for your brave expose even if it is a bit late”.. Bush’s statement completely avoids a personal acceptance of his responsibility for his war itself nor the war crimes committed by our country. Until he fesses up to those things, he can save his wimpy illusion to his regrets.

Posted by: Mari | June 11, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am

YEE HAW!!!!! is not a foreign policy………

Posted by: dk | June 11, 2008, 5:01 am 5:01 am

Bush supporters are like lemmings,if Bush told them to jump of a cliff they’d ask which one? The eighty percent who can’t stand Bush laugh at you pathetic people! Wake up please!

Posted by: AJ | June 11, 2008, 5:23 am 5:23 am

The only way Bush will get any fragment of respect before he leaves the planet. Is to admit that he was ‘sick in his interpretation’ of ‘control..that his rush to war was a payback for his daddy’s critics…that he and Cheney figured it would be a great way to bilk money toward their personal coffers…that Tony Blair was just another puppet on a string of fools…that he relished in the fact that he did and still does bamboozle his blind followers with ‘campfire scarey stories’…that the last thing he wants to see is Obama in office to underscore how depleted he left America (economically,spiritually,ethically)….and how satisfied he became knowing that when he won his second term, that he THEN really knew he could run amok with his demented philosophy. The fact that his wife says ‘one day her husband will be remmembered’ with respect shows that she missed her last medication update.

Posted by: Bravo Encore | June 11, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

To be a Bush supporter at this point would be like the guy who is trying to find a good deal on an ‘Edsel’…Good luck! You’ll need it!

Posted by: Bravo Encore | June 11, 2008, 5:55 am 5:55 am

Hello?!! The Europeans hate you too Bush!

Posted by: Bob | June 11, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Sure hope he regrets his “mission accomplished” aboard the aircraft carrier statement … lots of brave Americans have died since that statement – and we are still at war since that statement.

Posted by: dixiecharms | June 11, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Interesting that he admits this to a British newspaper, but not directly to the American people. He’s a little coward.

Posted by: cturple | June 11, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Bush bashers are out in force this morning. The man is MAN ENOUGH to admit he used the wrong language and this is the type of crap he gets from his fellow Americans, but I am sure none of you self righteous wonderful people have never said anything that you later regretted. How pathetic we are.

Posted by: Billy Bob | June 11, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

So you are telling me that regretting what you say, and regretting what you do are the same. Not in this lifetime. He still says he doesnt’ regret the war. Which is more important what you say or what you do. Smart people will say its what you do. That’s just my thought. I don’t think I’m alone on this one though!

Posted by: Jason | June 11, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Has anybody checked to see if hell has frozen over? I do believe this is the first time he has admitted he screwed up royally.

Posted by: Catherine | June 11, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

He said that what he said makes him look like he’s not a man of peace. LOL. No, going to war based on made up intelligence, and lies makes you look like you are not a man of peace.

Posted by: Jason | June 11, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

To Terry, do you know that the democratic party primary election had already ended? or are you a McBush’s prawn?

Posted by: mampang | June 11, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

My heart goes out to all the families who have buried their children because of this man. He regrets? Regrets? This is why EXPERIENCE IS KEY IN ELECTING A PRESIDENT! He regrets – well we regret, for many generations to come, his presidency.

Posted by: Bronx4Freedom4All | June 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

El_Pajaro, there is one poll you did not mention. Bush’s approval rating is around 29%. Congress’s approval rating is around 10%. Surley if the Democrats offered a better alternative, their approval rating would be in the 90s by this time.

Posted by: marco123 | June 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

I am sure I will get comments like what a stupid question but so be it, I just want to know this since so many people want immediately out of the war, what is the plan after we are out? negotiate with the terroists, wait for another attack, nothing?

Posted by: Ash | June 11, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

A little too late for the 4,000+ dead soldiers, thousands injured and tens of thousands of dead Iraqis.
And yet, McFlip Flop continues to carry your banner of lone American cowboy against the rest of the world. Enough of this, as the price is simply too heavy for the American people to pay. If it is one thing you have taught us Bush, is that we MUST find the way to mend our relations with allied nations and approach the terrorists and other international crises as a group of allied nations coming together for the greater good of the world. The American people simply cannot afford the huge consequence of going it alone.

Posted by: nerakami | June 11, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Ash:
The answer is simple: An Obama administration will help bring civility and peace throughout the world….
Have you ever seen senator Obama lose his cool? The man exudes excellence of temperment…….His presence in the White House will help bring calm to Iraq…Okay. There’s your answer.

Posted by: shalom | June 11, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

I think Bush was dreaming when he thought he could bring democracy to Iraq.Saddam was a Tyrant yes,But he had to be like that to survive in that kind of jungle where there are many Tyrants who want to kill you.Guess what? Bush has removed one tyrant and left the other who are just waitng for the next President to bring home the troops to start their own brand of tyranny.Bush started a war that achieved nothing because the middle east is as dangerous as it has ever been maybe even more.All the war did was kill our young men and women and bring greater economic distress to america and it’s allies.

Posted by: keeturbo | June 11, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Bush, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and Condi were so incredibly clueless about the realities of invading Iraq as to be criminally incompetent. Criminally incompetent – yes, they should be put in jail for war crimes perpetuated due to their stupidity. Rumsfeld thought we’d be greeted with roses and did not want to invest in rebuilding their civil infrastructure after bombing it to the ground. How could such fools have gotten into power.
Cheney is another story. He knew the risks. I assume the reason he wanted to go in was that he saw dollars for himself and his ideology.

Posted by: Marketrealist | June 11, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

And on the same day, he hasn’t ruled out bombing Iran. Will someone get this idiot out of the White House.

Posted by: runnerin1 | June 11, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Posted by: marco123 | Jun 11, 2008 10:11:07 AM
Congress’ approval is 10% because they refuse to IMPEACH Bush.

Posted by: KS KATTY | June 11, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I do not like this tactic of Bush. Why now does he realize his mistakes after spending years in Iraq. I believe he did what he needed for his term and that was to make money for high corporation who invested money in war material and make it nearly impossible to fix the problem we created. It’s funny how money hold such a higher value than life. I hope that an investigation is made on the Bush administration and the true means of the war is revealed

Posted by: Henry | June 11, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

There is a move going on in Washington today to impeach this criminal..It will never be to late to try and get rid of this nut job. Even after he is long gone from the Washington scene and is back in Texas trying to milk his bull.

Posted by: lucky | June 11, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

lucky:
Is that anyway to speak of your president?

Posted by: shalom | June 11, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Bush didn’t start this war, drive up oil prices to economy crippling levels, rack up deficits so large it’s deflating our dollar, cause the credit/housing crisis all by himself.
Where was congress? They are supposed to be the check and balance against the president. They are supposed to submit budgets that balance. They are supposed to enact laws providing reasonable oversight of interstate commerce (credit cards and mortgage companies). They are supposed to foresee potential issues, like the growing harm our dependence on oil is causing, and enact laws to mitigate the harm, like allowing focused drilling, raising CAFE standards (years before they did), encouraging investment in alternative energy supplies. WHERE WERE THEY? ELECT ANYBODY BUT THE INCUMBANTS.

Posted by: X marks the spot | June 11, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Bless his little heart, of course he was misunderstood. Most of the American
people misunderstood and thought he was telling the truth when he and his
criminal cohorts were lying through their teeth. It’s too late for impeachment, but once that bunch leave office there’s hope for charges of war crimes.
I guess we shouldn’t have expected it, but I’ll ask anyway: why didn’t ABC give more/any coverage to the Senate
intelligence report that came out earlier this month? Hey, ABC people,
the Daily Show with Jon Stewart covered it!
Scott McClellan was correct when he said the media was complicit in covering up the lies in the run up to the war; even Katie Couric recognized the press should be embarrassed. Yep, the media was played and shown to be cowards by the Bush Administration and ,unfortunately, over 4,100 American heroes and hundreds of thousands of Iraqui citizens had to die, over 25,000 American heroes are wounded physically and/or mentally, and millions of Iraquis have been displaced from their homes. Thank God for Knight Ridder news service that had the courage to tell us the truth. Maybe ABC can lose some of the talking heads and hire some of their real journalists.
But through all the lies perpetuated by the media, isn’t it a shame that
we’re less safe now (according to Gen. Petraeus) than we were before bush
took us to war with Iraq? The Daily Show and Knight-Ridder – the only news
sources you can believe in.

Posted by: Mandy | June 11, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

“I think that in retrospect I could have used a different tone, a different rhetoric.” How about using the truth? That you were lying isn’t part of your regrets. What a concept…

Posted by: Fatesrider | June 11, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

All I can say is that if Bush did NOTHING, and we were attacked again, you would think even WORSE of him. Its a no win situation. Democrats will always blame Republicans, and Republicans will always do what they think is right, not what the poles think.

Posted by: locutus103161 | June 11, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Just like the Korean War there will not be an outcome and even if we set a deadline to pull the troops out the day after we leave it’ll go back to complete chaos. This was not a war worth fighting and I wish we never had to sacrifice those men that were in the war and are going to be in the war.

Posted by: Ashley | June 11, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Once we have killed more Iraqi citizens than Sadam then can we leave? We are trying to cure a global illness with local surgery. Oh, and fatesrider, there were no Iraqis in 9/11!! They were Saudis!!

Posted by: Creed | June 11, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

NEO POLITICUS…You must have a severe reading problem like your whacked out leader. Who cant read at all. We have almost 4500 dead service people and thousands of others.Bush is a war criminal, this is BUSH’s war, Bush started this war for daddy. Now go get your “WORLD ACCORDING TO – GEORGE BUSH” coloring book and crayons and go to your room and color and be quiet.

Posted by: lucky | June 11, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

How quaint the man finally expresses some regret – not for wasting the precious lives of American soldiers in an unnecessary war of choice, but for the fact that he’s been ‘misunderstood’ and that some don’t see him as a ‘man of peace’! What a crock. Bush’s legacy is one of abject failure, and damage to our economy, our moral standing, and our system of justice. Bush is solely responsible for the deaths or our troops and innocent iraqis. He should be impeached, and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law on a charge of treason and murder.

Posted by: Tom | June 11, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

You have to realize that Bush, yes Bush has killed more innocent Iraqis than Saddam. Just think about the reality of that for a moment. All of this killing for a mistake. He needs to boil in hell for an eternity.

Posted by: exactlyrighttom | June 11, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

The plans to attack IRAN are already drawn up and are awaiting for someone to execute. GUESS WHO?????????????

Posted by: arnal | June 11, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

… BUT NO REGRET ABOUT WAR ITSELF????????????????????????????????????????

Posted by: Mark Webb | June 11, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

When you think of our lost and injured soldiers, the estimated 90,000 Iraqis who have died, not to mention how many must be permanently maimed and the tremendous amount of money we’ve spent on the Iraq War and all Bush regrets is the language he used to sell the war to us? The man is unbelievable.
And Bush’s idea that Obama wanting to renegotiate trade deals is a bad thing is laughable. Our trade deficits are terrible, we’ve lost so many manufacturing jobs which provided decent livable wages and it’s obvious many of these trade deals were only negotiated to increase corporate profits.
I honestly don’t know how Bush or anyone in his administration can sleep at night when they are responsible for so much misery.

Posted by: Lydia | June 12, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Good point keeprapped. It was Reagan who sent over chemical wmd’s. You made my point. We made a deal with the devil in the 1980′s in siding with Hussein against Iran. It was identical to siding with Joseph Stalin against Adolph Hitler. That’s the world we live in. We had 44 years of “cold war” after that. Now we have an enemy that doesn’t believe in M.A.D, a more deadly scenario.
My “beloved dubya” played the hand he was dealt. He was acting under U.N. Res 1441 stating that Iraq was in violation of U.N. Res 687. That was passed after Iraq’s surrender of Kuwait in 1991. It required a “no fly zone” and weapons inspections. Both terms Hussein violated.
Bush gave Hussein four months to comply (11-02 to 3-03). As said this after years of Hussein flipping off the warnings of Bill Clinton.
Jihad was declared years before 9-11. The first WTC bombing was fair warning. Iraq was not involved in either attack, but don’t doubt they didn’t sympathize and didn’t at least know on the periphery what was about to go down.
You are right it is “meatgrinder”. I hope they would be out of there yesterday. But wishing won’t get it done. As for the increase in terrorist attacks, it’s not so. The level of attacks and number of casualties is down since the end of 2007. Whether that continues I don’t know if that will continue any more than you do.
You “sleep under the facade of safety”, same as I do. Thank our soldiers for that. Don’t stab them in the back by turning your back on them.

Posted by: John | June 12, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Bush jr. decided to invade Iraq with the help of Cheney and Rumsfeld, despite Arab experts warning it would lead to civil war and instability for years in Iraq. Bush sr. wrote in his book that he didn’t invade Iraq during Desert Storm for that same reason, experts warning him.
And now “More than five years after the initial invasion of Iraq, the Senate Intelligence Committee has finally gone on the record: the Bush administration misused, and in some cases disregarded, intelligence which led the nation into war. The two final sections of a long-delayed and much anticipated “Phase II” report on the Bush administration’s use of prewar intelligence, released on Thursday morning, accuse senior White House officials of repeatedly misrepresenting the threat posed by Iraq.” So now Bush supporters can no longer say he was fooled by faulty intelligence. He knew there was no wmd, he knew there was no link between 9/11 and Sadaam, was it just that he wanted a war with a country with oil? His campaign was largely funded by oil companies and what a coincidence, the oil companies are making record profits. As I’ve said before, I honestly don’t know how Bush or members of his administration sleep at night. 4,000 of our soldiers dead, thousands permanently maimed physically and mentally, 90,000 Iraq citizens dead, millions are refugees; the sheer amount of misery Bush has created is disastrous.

Posted by: Lydia | June 12, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

JOHN…You are such a war hero!!! Well why don’t you go get your little toy gun and little plastic helmet and go join the fight??? Your such a HERO with other peoples lives..It is getting late and way past your bed time so better still you go with NEO POLITICUS, to your room and get out your copy “THE WORLD ACCORDING TO GEORGE BUSH” coloring book and crayons and color for a little while..Mommie will bring you some warm milk soon..And you will be able to dream about being a big bad soldier with a big gun again tonight..MY HERO.

Posted by: lucky | June 12, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

TWO words describe BUSH…And they are “WAR MONGER” or “WAR CRIMINAL”…Take your pick!!!!

Posted by: lucky | June 12, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

He doesn’t regret anything. He just said he’s glad he invaded and would do it all over again if he were presented a second chance to change things or not.
He doesn’t regret anything and he’s not sorry. He needs to be prosecuted and put away in prison to pay for his crimes against humanity.

Posted by: John_Hoggie | June 12, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

Oh Lydia, your sarcasim is so beneath you. It just shows those of you who resort to it and the name calling really don’t have an arguement.
Go ahead and check my facts, by doing a simple Wikipedia search. Even you can do it Lydia.
Anyhow, no I am no war hero,I only support those who are. I know people with sons and daughters in Iraq and most if not all believe in their cause. Their problem is with people like you Lydia, the ones who think you can “support the troops without supporting the mission”. If you really care at all.
Their problem is with the elected officials who agreed to the war, again seeing the same intelligence that Bush did. Who, when the war turned bad undercut Bush, and threatened to pull funding. They and the Lydia’s giving hope and encouragment to Al Queda, who by objective accounts are beaten. Thanks Lydia.
I can respect anyone who was against the war, when it was being debated. Once the decision was made, support the mission or shut the hell up. And then go vote for the terrorist appeaser of your choice. You know democracy, the very thing the Islamic fundamentalists most hate us for.

Posted by: John | June 12, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

I have the utmost disdain and contempt for President Bush and I am an American.
Dallas, Texas.

Posted by: winemaker | June 12, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Well the Bush Rat is in Italy today amid massive anti-Bush demonstrations.He has not seen any thing yet wait until November here..And George McSame will wonder what hit him.The Republicans along with the Bush Rat and McSame will be all be gone…220 more days of these thugs.

Posted by: lucky | June 12, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Bush has a big sign hanging in the Vatican that reads “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED”.

Posted by: lucky | June 12, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

(:>()

Posted by: Anders Scooper | June 12, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

((:>(( .)

Posted by: Anders Scooper | June 12, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Come on, don’t any of you armchair presidents have anything further to say.

Posted by: John | June 13, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Republicans use racist fear of the black man while they continue to screw over whites and everyone else as they laugh all the way to the bank.
Yep, republicans are counting on whites to ignore 7 years of getting screwed without vaseline because they think fear of blacks will trump any problems they have with bush/cheney and mccain.

Posted by: geevil | June 13, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

This is really brave for Mr. Bush to have regrets in the UK. He’s done the opposite at home. Rather, its “in your face” or the big stonewall to any hint that the war and his leadership was improvident. Sometimes he lies or misleads as well as the bullying mentioned above.

Posted by: Jordan Hill | June 13, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

Wow, that’s something I never thought we would hear.

Posted by: irma | June 13, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.