Clinton Says No Nominee on Tuesday — Makes Direct Appeal to Superdelegates
ABC News’ Eloise Harper reports: Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., thanked Puerto Ricans Sunday night for helping her to victory on the island where she spent five days campaigning, saying “Te quiero Puerto Rico!” Her real message, however, was to the undecided superdelegates who Clinton hopes will veer her way to salvage her campaign.
Clinton’s main argument is that she is leading in the popular vote, saying this evening, “More people across the country have voted for our campaign. More people have voted for us than for any candidate in the history of presidential politics. We are winning the popular vote. Now there can be no doubt. The people have spoken, you have chosen your candidate.”
The senator argued that there will not be a nominee on Tuesday saying, “So, when the voting concludes on Tuesday, neither Sen. Obama nor I will have the number of delegates to be the nominee. I will lead the popular vote, he will maintain a slight lead in the delegate count. The decision will fall on the shoulders of those leaders in our party, empowered by the rules, to vote at the Democratic convention.
Speaking directly to superdelegates, Clinton said, “I do not envy the decision you must make. But the decision has to be made. And in the final assessment, I ask you to consider these questions. Which candidate best represents the will of the people who voted?” Clinton said. “Which candidate can best lead us to victory in November, and which candidate is best able to lead our nation as our president in the face of unprecedented challenges at home and abroad?”
Clinton, as she has done for the past four election day speeches, made a direct appeal for money, urging people to go to her Web site. “I cannot complete this journey without your help. We have two contests left. We have South Dakota and Montana, and you can make a difference by visiting hillaryclinton.com.”
Pop singer Ricky Martin, who endorsed Clinton, blasted through the speakers as she entered and exited the stage. She swayed back and forth to the music with her Puerto Rican co-chairs. Clinton now embarks on a seven-hour red-eye flight to South Dakota where she will spend the day campaigning tomorrow.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
She has only won the popular vote according to her rules which we know can change at the drop of a hat.
Posted by: Paige | June 1, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Paige- Amen Sister!
Posted by: jozy | June 1, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
TOO BAD
Dean and company have already stacked the deck and Hillary will lose. You can take it to the bank!
Posted by: Thomas | June 1, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
No one will win the nominee by just pledge delegates BUT
SDs will put Obama over the top
Posted by: Vanessa | June 1, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
You people are so boring…yeah, right, Hillary made up the rules. Tell me, what rule on earth takes 4 delegates from someone who has won them, and gives them to someone who wasn’t even in a contest?
Now that’s not only bending the rules, that is true creation of rules.
Obama is a loser.
Posted by: I AM | June 1, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
I find it funny she keeps talking about count all 50 states, but her popular vote total doesn’t count all states or voters.
She doesn’t count the caucus states where people went out of their way to vote for her and Obama.
She is ahead only by her screwed up math. If you run it through a real calculator she is behind… period.
Posted by: Chad S | June 1, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Democrats like to lose. Either that or they have almost no idea about what MOST of America stands for and wants.
Far left whackos are NOT what MOST Americans want. Obama is a far left whacko.
Hillary or McCain 08!!
Posted by: Vickie | June 1, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Thomas:
No nominee EVER wins the nomination with have a Super Delegate count on their side.
The only difference here is that they split the delegates pretty evenly and it wil take 20 Super Delagates for him to win.
These 20 could have endorsed months ago and it would of been pledged delegates putting him over on tues/wed.
Posted by: Chad S | June 1, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Just a couple more days and this will all be over.
Hoping for a Obama/Webb ticket for the Fall.
I think that ticket could definitely win the general election.
Posted by: Stacey | June 1, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Dean and the news media have stacked the deck. The news media just skims over every contest where Hillary has won by a landslide or they spin it to say Obama is gaining. I guess the media is afraid to let the news get out that once again she has won with a 36 point advantage. You can bet that if their darling Obama had won it would be “Hillary trounced” and it would have been the lead story infront of a movie studio fire. I find it amazing the power these network news editors think they have when the real, and complete news is at our fingertips.
Posted by: tiredtoo | June 1, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
You know Hillary is has become apparent that you are starting to believe your own fairy tale lies now.
When June 3rd come if not sooner the super delegate have already started pledging your opponent. He receive one this morning, three this afternoon, and who knows this evening may be alot more.
Hillary you lost this race. It’s done, over, gone. You cannot take your pleas to the convention it just won’t happen.
Posted by: Wallace | June 1, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
I am:
The rule that says that Obama (and Edwards) was more faithful to the process than Hillabeans, who first said the votes didn’t count, then said they did.
The rule that says that some voters voted for Hillabeans because she was on the ballot and they didn’t want to vote for “uncommitted.”
The rule that says if there had been a revote, Obama would have won the primary.
The rule that says the Obama reps could have pushed for 50-50 split and gotten 9 more delegates (4.5 votes), but did not IN THE INTEREST OF PARTY UNITY, something which was lacking from the Clinton camp yesterday!
The rule that says the vote didn’t count, so Hillabeans should be thankful for ANYTHING she gets out of Michigan, and still doesn’t stand a chance of getting the nomination.
Those rules.
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: jackt51 | June 1, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
The delegates super or not have the right to change their mind even at the convention.
Hillary won the popular vote and if the pledged delegates go as their voters did she would win the delegate count too.
What the delegates should concentrate on who has the better chance in November and with the GOP ads with Pfleger’s and Wright’s anti-white and antisemitic video-clips with subtitles “Obama gave $200,000 earmark to his church” as opposed to McCain not asking for earmarks it will be hard if not impossible for Obama to win.
Posted by: AGS345 | June 1, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
She has gone over the deep end. She just won in a ‘territory’ that cannot even vote in the general election. The only way she is ahead in the popular vote is if you count the states she wants to count and leave the caucus states out…count every vote my lily white @$$. She has changed the rules so many times I’m surprised she even remembers what they are.
It’s time for the Clinton’s to GO.
Posted by: Can't Wait to Vote (again) in Ohio | June 1, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Obama people, you and I need to be kind to Hillary voters, because we WILL NEED THEM to get Barack into office, and also because it is NOT NICE to kick a person when she’s down. We can remind the Hillary voters that they need to see reality but we shouldn’t put them down or insult them. Who knows what will be. Whatever will be will be.
Posted by: ChayaFradle | June 1, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
With the far left and black vote sewn up, it’s on to the GE for Obama and defeat for the Democrats…again.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
AGS – she only wins the popular vote if you leave out many of the caucus states and give her a full count in MI and Obama zero. Unfortunately, Hillary is the only one that really thinks she won the popular vote.
Posted by: Paige | June 1, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Don’t brush it off. That “territory” had 55 votes, far more than many of our states. Evidently the DNC by their rules thought it important.
Posted by: tiredtoo | June 1, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Obama and his pastors have set race relations back 50 years. No speech is going to change that.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
let us now focus on what is next.. obama/ webb,
or obama/ sebelius.
either one will be a perfect tickect for a landslide victory in november.. watch out republican.. this is the change we beleive in.
obama 08
Posted by: mohsin | June 1, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Obama and who? He’s a loser no matter who you stick with him.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Super delegates should not overturn the will of the people!!!! Pelosi has said this herself! It’s up to te SD’s
Posted by: CD | June 1, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
ChayaFradle |I appreciate your wise words. We must remember that the Democratic voters are only about half the voters in a general election when you consider that the only Democrat to gain over 50% of the general election vote was Jimmy Carter in 1976 (50.1%). Bill Clinton only won because it was a three-way race.
Without Hillary’s supporters, Obama would receive about 25%
Posted by: tiredtoo | June 1, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN!!
Now that our party no longer represents our interests and beliefs as far as the presidential candidate goes, it’s time for us to vote our conscience and support McCain in November. It is not an easy decision but we must do it. However, still vote for all other Democratic candidates so that a new Democratic congressional majority can work with moderate McCain. Let the Obama worshippers yell amongst themselves — we have more important things to do.
MCAIN IN 2008
HILLARY IN 2012!!!!!!
Posted by: Freethinking Democrat | June 1, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
I will never vote for Obama or McCain-I won’t vote!
Posted by: CD | June 1, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Obama and gang are use to hand outs what should we expect him to win fair and square there are alot of strange things about this election just like the Irqa war sold to us even if we don’t want it hope the republicans can figure out how to beat him or are they in on it ? They could have done a revote, and Fl. by thier rules should have been seated with full vote this whole thing is fixed I have never seen anything like this in my thirty five years of voting dem. something is not right .He didn’t need her four delegates why take them ?
Posted by: Bishop | June 1, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
She wins the popular vote, if you count the caucus states by the number of the actual votes and of course you have to count FL and MI, they will vote in November.
If you count actual casted votes no question that Hillary wins.
Posted by: AGS345 | June 1, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
“Obama and his pastors have set race relations back 50 years.”
I contend that Messrs. Wright, Ayers, Farrakhan, Pfelger and their spokesman-frontman Obama has set race relations back 12-squared years. Abe Lincoln would have turned in his grave. A majority of Whites, Asians and Hispanics have been compelled to appreciate the glaring Atlantic between them and the Africans-African Americans.
“Hillary or McCain 08!!”
Clinton > McCain >>>>>>>>>>>> Obama
BECAUSE
God > Country >>>>>>>>>>>> ANY Political Party
Posted by: Brent | June 1, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
tired-too….Puerto Rico is a wonderful place but the 38 delegates HRC got out of it aren’t going to put her over the top, and her popularity there means little because they cannot vote in the general election.
I have no doubt that the Democrats will unite once this primary battle is over. There is too much at stake for us to allow John McSame to win in November.
Posted by: Can't Wait to Vote (again) in Ohio | June 1, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Such an enlightening moment in our history. LOL Hillary the Unhinged has FINALLY ran into a wall that SHE can’t forced her way through. Too bad she dosen’t get to decide who the nominee is. Someone needs to point that out to her or better yet let her wait until Tuesday and find out for herself that the powers that be? are tired of the Clinton’s stinking bottoms.
Posted by: Brian | June 1, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
CD
Sure you’ll vote for Obama. You just need a little time to reflect.
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Brad
Come on — even the dems admit Obama is a left-winger.
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
How about Obama/Lincoln? Since you’re dreaming.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
S-I’m sorry we don’t drink out of the same Kool-Aid bowl!
NO OBAMA!!!
Posted by: CD | June 1, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Obama will win the battle and lose the war. I experienced McGovern, and Mondale and Kerry and Gore. The electoral vote is all.
Posted by: jward | June 1, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
YES, I love those numbers on the opening page… Sotero gets trounced once again!
All the way to the Convention!
Hillary 08… Obama 24
Posted by: Denver! | June 1, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
He’d be considered “centrist” in the communist party.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Someone give em four delegates please and count every vote so the whining will stop. No wait… just give them a “Time out!”. This reminds me of the game where you pick the hand with the pebble in it and when you do, NOW it’s best two out of three.
Posted by: Fresh Brains | June 1, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
“watch out republican..”
What did you do to ALL the OTHER over 120,000,000 Republicans? Did you send Martians to the White House to keep Mr. Bush company? Is he the ONLY Republican left on earth?
Posted by: Brent | June 1, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
NEITHER ONE OF THEM HAS THE DELEGATES!!!! IT NOW GOES TO THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!!!! THE S-DELEGATES HAVE TO DECIDE THIS ELECTION, WILL THEY OVERTURN THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!
Posted by: CD | June 1, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
To my fellow Hillary supporters, the DNC has short changed Hillary from the start, Saturday was just another example of the injustice that has taken place during this primary season, its time to think about supporting McCain
DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN.
Posted by: al | June 1, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
CD
The supers will nominate Obama. There’s too much pressure from congressional insiders like Pelosi for it to be otherwise. Fact it — individuals mean nothing in this party.
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
It’s a shame. The best candidate will not win the democratic primary. But she will be back for an encore. Hllary in ’12.
Posted by: Paulus | June 1, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
any prediction for montana and south dacota..
i expect obama to win both handly, and rap up the fourth quarter with a two three jump shots securing the nomination for good.
any prediction folks..
Posted by: mohsin | June 1, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Present a black candidate that has more experience than “community organizing” and that hasn’t supported a racist church for 20 years and he, or she, would have a realistic chance.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Actually, in any European country, Obama would be considered center-right. As a communist, he might only fit in with the Chinese where they’ve shed any of the pretense towards Marxism and are as into Capitalism as much as someone like say, Mack.
He’s clearly neither communist nor even socialist. He’s a centrist by American standards — far to the right of Kucinich or Nader and is pretty much right where Hillary has been in her time in the Senate. He’s to the left of Bush and Cheney though. I’ll give you that.
Posted by: Brad | June 1, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
S-Good thing I’m no longer a Dem, as an Independent I don’t have to be embarassed by the inside backstabbing of your Party. What a joke your party is!!!
Posted by: CD | June 1, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Send a strong messsage to the far left of our democratic party, the DNC has been hijacked by the far left hollywood liberals with their big money
DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN.
Posted by: al | June 1, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Brad
Of he were any farther left, he’d fall off the earth.
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
4 Delegates taken away from Hillary, woe is me. This is the poisoned pawn (looks like attractive argument but the cost turns out to be to high), this is her test. Does she accept the will of all voters or does she make a petty argument to challenge the nomination. Bow out gracefully or persue the scorched earth policy, the choice is hers. She has embittered her supporters in vain. “The times they are
a changing, if you can’t lend a hand get out of the way”. I predict the Superdelegates support Obama enmass this week.
Wether Obama supporters would vote Hillary has been a mute point for awhile. This is why his supporters have not been asked this question. She has created any division in the party.
Countries like Iran, Russia and Cuba hold elections with only one name on ballot. Michigan got a good deal accept it.
Posted by: Erik | June 1, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
the recent decision of obama to leave the church proves one thing, Obama is just another politician, even his former disgraced pastor said the same thing. Maybe the Reverend wright wasn’t so wrong.
Posted by: al | June 1, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
You may consider him a centrist, although that doesn’t mean he is. Most people consider him and his supporters to be to the far-left of the Democratic Party. Good luck trying to spin him as a centrist though.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Hillary is our only answer in Nov. With Obama as the nominee the democrats will not win back the white house. I don’t know one Hillary supporter that will place a vote for Obama.
Hillary or McCain 08′
Posted by: MASP | June 1, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Obama’s no centrist, he’s a left wing nut!!! That’s why he’s loved by all the other left wing nuts!!!
Posted by: CD | June 1, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Obama – full of sound and fury; signifying nothing!
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
He is a far left Whacko..However, I don’t mind if you leave out far-left..Whacko is just fine too.
I think it is time for all the smart people to go to the John McCain website and sign up as a supporter. I have just done that and I think a mass sign up will prove to the DNC we mean what we say when we say we will NOT vote for Obama.
Ignore the scare tactics used by the Obamabots. A true war hero, as McCain is, will not let his country down.
Vote McCain! Vote for a proven true American!
Hillary or McCain 08!!
Posted by: Vickie | June 1, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
“…voted for OUR campaign…voted for US…” Elect one, get one free! Very strange.
Posted by: Curious | June 1, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Jon Stewart already joked about it weeks ago:
Hillary will still be running for President at the day of Obama’s inauguration.
She has become a disgrace to all ambitious women, for she turned The Ambitious Woman into a caricature of a hysterical b*tch who is obsessed by power.
May she retire soon, or join a Freak Show.
Posted by: maria | June 1, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Primaries are about number of delegates and not about popualr vote or number of big states won or small states lost. But by all count Obama has more pledge delegates, more superdelegates, more states won and more popular vote. These are real and objective facts and superdelagtes have to consider these realities and not the math of Hill the Bosnian General. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | June 1, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
“Hillary in ’12.” ?? Are you kidding yourself? She is pursuing a scorched earth strategy, manipulating (defining how to count the vote, trying to twist everyone’s arms and lying (bullets in Bosnia, anyone? How can she get her own life wrong?) left and right, increasingly populist. In January, I would have voted for her — now, I would not even believe the time of the day out her mouth. The 2008 elections were the democrats to lose. And lose they will, sadly for this country.
Posted by: p | June 1, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Barrack will win in Nov. without Hillary on the ticket … If he puts her on the ticket he will lose beacuse his message is change!! with Hill there will be no change just the same old Insider way.. She is toast and has been toast for sometime, the damage she has done to herself and her Party loyalty will cost her second seat! She should have gone to Barrack when there was no way of her winning the nod and said I want to apply for Vp.. But win at any cost could not and would not. She has lost a lot of voters with her attitude that the Nod was hers for the taking.
She believed in her own HYPE. and the Press when they and almost all Americans figured she would be the winner.
Then people really began to her Barack and said YES WE CAN.!! He will unite the majority of all and win back the White House and fix this Great Nation.
She needs to apologize to a major portion of the Dem. Party for her disloyality.
Obama 08 the next President
Posted by: Lauren | June 1, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
I know you are idealistic. But you’ve been lied to. Obama is no uniter and hope and change are just empty rhetoric. You need to see through the hype. He’s just a woefully inexperienced candidate with dubious friends and a racist mentor. He is the wrong person at the wrong time.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
I would like to put out the thought to Eric that single names on the ballot are not just limited to those countries. Many times when I go to vote the only name on the ballot is the incumbent because no one dares to waste their time or money to run against them. I usually skip those races because I believe in competition.
Posted by: tiredtoo | June 1, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
It’s time for all of the Hillary supporters to start making sure that the senators on down that are coming up on off years get voted since we are the ones who get out and vote in between Preident’s Election. We need to have a web site called who’s next to be voted out.It will be easy to put them out
Posted by: Bishop | June 1, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
One candidate leads in pledged delegates by 117.
That same candidate leads in overall delegates by 155.
The other candidate’s claim to lead in the popular vote depends upon fraudulent math, and discounts the votes of caucus states.
We have a nominee.
And it’s not the one who uses fraudulent math.
Posted by: R. Squibbs | June 1, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
I find it odd that Hillary supporters seem to forget that almost exactly the same number of people supported Obama as supported her.
This is a split decision. The party is not making the decision. The party is breaking a virtual tie. This is not a usurpation of the “will of the people.”
This is exactly what the super delegates were put in place to do.
This whole thing has become very juvenile. It’s like a fight over whether Britney Spears or Pink is the better pop star.
I think a lot of people need to grow up and real fast or this country is doomed. It is embarrassing at how uneducated and uninformed the electorate seems to be.
Posted by: Isn't it curious | June 1, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
TO AL
OBAMA WILL WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION THE WAY HE DEFEATED CLINTON+HILLARY+THEIR MACHIN
Posted by: sam | June 1, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Obama will lose th GE! He’s already losing it and it hasn’t even started yet!
Posted by: CD | June 1, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
“Of he were any farther left, he’d fall off the earth.”
I thought God lived in another galaxy.
Posted by: Brent | June 1, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
As a Canadian, I envy you Americans for your politics. What a fascinating race and what incredible candidates! I am not sure who I would vote for if I could vote, but you must admit that Ms. Clinton has shown incredible tenacity and energy. In a coin toss between two very competitive, equally capable, candidates, I think Hillary Clinton’s efforts in the last week might tip the scales in her favour. I would want a President whom I could count on never to give up, no matter what.
Posted by: D'arcy Elliott | June 1, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Can anyone imagine the reaction of the obama camp if hillary’s pastor had mocked obama for being white? As a democrat i use to believe that the GOP claim that the media was too liberal was crap but now i’m not so sure. First they give Bush a free pass on iraq and now they give obama a free pass on his past.
Posted by: al | June 1, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN!!
Now that our party no longer represents our interests and beliefs as far as the presidential candidate goes, it’s time for us to vote our conscience and support McCain in November. It is not an easy decision but we must do it. However, still vote for all other Democratic candidates so that a new Democratic congressional majority can work with moderate McCain. Let the Obama worshippers yell amongst themselves — we have more important things to do.
MCAIN IN 2008
HILLARY IN 2012!!!!!!
Posted by: Freethinking Democrat | June 1, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
The simple fact that she has started lying AGAIN, now about leading in the popular vote, tells it all.
Hillary Clinton would be the worst President of the Bush and Clinton dynasties.
But America can rejoice, for this pathological liar will never BE President.
At the age of 80 she however no doubt will TELL people that she has been the most magnificent President in the history of the United States…
In other words, at the age of 80 she STILL will be a running joke.
Posted by: hasselblad | June 1, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Obama has been losing his own primaries in unheard of landslides.
Posted by: geevill | June 1, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
sam
What way was that?
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
If Hillary won the popular vote,then how come Obama has more delegates, even before this weekend when we were not counting Michigan and Florida? And why did Michigan and Florida ignore the rules? Let’s just change the rules in the middle of the game when we don’t think we like the probable outcome, shall we?
I think this tells us more about the kind of president Hillary would really be. Thankfully, we don’t have to find out.
Go Obama
Posted by: janet Scarbrough | June 1, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
“I would want a President whom I could count on never to give up, no matter what.” D’arcy Elliott
Exactly why she has so many diehard supporters. If she is not nominated, I am thinking of moving to Canada. Is Toronto better than Vancouver or neither is as good as your city? Steve Harper seems not so bad.
I am glad you are not one of the few Canadian lunatics (they are in every country you know not that I am complaining) whose devotion to Obama is beyond any verbal description.
Clinton > McCain >>>>>>>>>>>> Obama
Posted by: Brent | June 1, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
BREAKING NEWS!
If 80% of Hillary voters had had some basic education, they would never have voted for this populist and fraudulent queen of hysteria and obsession with power.
Posted by: ickes | June 1, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Truth is the idea that Hillary “controls” a massive block of people is ridiculous.
First, there are a few complete whack jobs who won’t vote Obama, but they do not have the numbers to sway an election.
Second, there are a lot of McCain supporters commenting just to stir up trouble and do not in any way reflect how well Obama can do in November.
Most of the people who voted for HIllary in the primaries will vote Obama in November. Those who don’t will be more than made up for by new voters and disgruntled republicans and independents. Obama does much better with independents and republicans than Hillary does in poll after poll.
The democratic BASE (this does not include nut job Hillary obsessed fanatics) will vote for Obama.
These nut jobs give themselves way too much credit and have some serioues problems with delusions of granduer and possession of power they simply don’t have.
Posted by: Comfort | June 1, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Obama ran a superior campaign, he has shown stability, and calm in difficult situations.
Unlike Hillary he has maintained his message, and focus.
He has virtually stopped running against Hillary since IN and NC.
The supers understand what he has done, and out of courtesy to Hillary, have delayed their endorsements, they will not delay any longer.
Obama08
Posted by: Thinking | June 1, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
How pathetic. She claims victory in the popular vote based on winning votes on an island that’s ineligible to vote in the fall PLUS sham beauty contests in Michigan and Florida (one of which didn’t even include Obama on the ballot), and by not only excluding any projection to votes of any of the caucus states, but also excluding four caucus states Obama won where votes were not tabulated. As long as we’re counting Puerto Ricans, Hillary, why not hold an Indonesian primary, a Kenyan primary, a citizens under the age of 18 primary? Seems to me this would also be a more knowledgeable group of voters than many of the people who have voted for you.
Posted by: Noah | June 1, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Obama will use Hillary and her supporters to win the presidency for him.
Posted by: Zephaniah | June 1, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
McCain and Hillary lack credibility as does Bill. Her statements consist of half truth and and non truths. McCain’s assessments on Iraq are either from lack of understanding or lies to make his point. Hillary has done the same thing. No Bush or Clinton 3rd term please.
With the exception of one person the rules committee voted and approved the sanctions against Michigan and Florida. The Hillary supporters on that panel would be more credible if they had voted against sanctions. They are making it up as they go along, just like Bush and McCain.
1200 page medical record over 7 years? McCain is far to busy going to doctor to be president. Any Psychoanalysis in those records?
Posted by: Erik | June 1, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
It is over for the Queen she will never be able to run again. She has damaged herself and this Party and we WILL NEVER FORGET IT…SHE NEEDS TO REALIZE IT IS NOT CALLED THE CLINTONS PARTY.
IT IS CALLED THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR ALL!!!RULES APPLY TO ALL EVEN HILLARY.
THE RULES COMMITTEE VOTED AND SOME OF HER DELEGATES VOTED FOR THE RESOULUTIONS SHE NEEDS TO GET OVER HERSELF AND MOVE ON!!
IF SHE INSIST ON TAKING TO THE CONVENTION SHE WILL END UP LOOSING HE SEAT IN THE SENATE, THE NEXT TIME AROUND.. AND MAKE IT HARDER FOR THE NEXT ELECTABLE WOMEN TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT.
BARACK WILL WIN IN NOV. AND BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT
Posted by: Lauren | June 1, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
No such thing as a true “Democrat for McCain” as noted in many of these post. True Dems will not compromise values on women’s rights, the environment, affordable healthcare, investing in our infrastructure, taking care of our men and women in uniform and building diplomacy across the world again just out of spite for their candidate not getting the nomination. Even Hillary is in agreement with that and has stated so on several occasions.
Posted by: Paige | June 1, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
We have to get on past this people. It is more important than black or white, man or women. We can take advantage of this historic advantage or let it go.
Posted by: Cecil Campfield | June 1, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Obama supporters are afraid. They see a republican around every corner. It’s not the republicans that you need to watch out for, it’s the millions of Democrats that will not vote for Obama in the GE.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Hillary has lost, she lost the popular vote, she lost the pledged delegate vote, she lost the superdelegate vote, she lost the caucus vote, so what is her problem? I simply cannot stand to hear her voice anymore, for any reason.
Posted by: JeffWasHere | June 1, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Paige
Thank you for having common sense! Its a rarity on these boards!
Posted by: IslandGirl | June 1, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
All the delegates can decide till the last minute who they want to vote for, so the delegate count doesn’t matter and this point.
The problem is Obama can’t win in November. I can see the GOP ads with Pfleger’s and Wright’s anti-white and antisemitic video-clips with subtitles “Obama gave $200,000 earmark to his church”. “He gave a million of taxpayers money to Michelle’s hospital and she got a $200,000 raise”.
We are not talking about this stuff because we are politically correct, but the GOP is not. McCain didn’t have any earmarks.
Posted by: AGS345 | June 1, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
It is time for Hillary to concede, Tue. after the last primaries in Montana and South Dakota.
Posted by: starclede | June 1, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Republicans are shaking in their shoes .
They ll no that Barack will win the General Election in Nov. So keep trolling it will not work..Barack will be the next President and John will go back to his Senate seat until he has to run again,,then he will lose his seat to a Dem.Then we will have the Majority in both Houses.
Posted by: Lauren | June 1, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
“Dean and the news media have stacked the deck. The news media just skims over every contest where Hillary has won by a landslide or they spin it to say Obama is gaining”
Talk about spin. What is there for Obama to gain on in regards to Clinton? You may just be as delusional as the Clintons.
Posted by: ConfuciUS | June 1, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
The delegates super or not have the right to change their mind even at the convention.
Hillary won the popular vote and if the pledged delegates go as their voters did she would win the delegate count too.
DNC leaders – remember this, if you show HIGH HANDED-NESS, we will answer you in November.
We will make sure, Obama never wins in November!!
Posted by: Jkan | June 1, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Paige wrote: “No such thing as a true “Democrat for McCain” as noted in many of these post.”
yeah, and there wasn’t any such thing as Reagan Democrats either.
Go ask Obama’s godfather, Jimmy. He’ll tell you all about it.
He knows all about how Obama is going to lose in a landslide. He’s been there, done that.
But no, there was no such thing as Reagan Democrats, and 17 million won’t be driven to McCain the same way.
At least in Obamanut la la land.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: rd | June 1, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
I feel sad for the Clinton supporters who are taking their loss gracefully. We’ve all experienced having our candidate lose, and it hurts.
The Clinton supporters who are making up wild stuff about 1) Clinton “actually” having won, 2) Obama being a terrible person, and 3) McCain being their preferred candidate… well, there may be no helping them. They’ve completely lost touch with reality, and they don’t realize how much they’re shaming themselves, their candidate, and the party.
Posted by: Doppler | June 1, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
I’m a life long Republican, and my husband and I, as well as many of our friends will be voting for Obama in the national election- for the good of the country. Our feelings about continuing this Iraq war, and the failing economy are driving us, as well as our respect for how Obama has run his campaign. Many of us are planning on abandoning McSame and crossing over for the good of the country. Believe me, doing so will hurt us Republicans in our pocketbooks, but the country is going in the wrong direction under McCain/ Bush/ Cheney. It is time for a change come November.
Posted by: Sarah | June 1, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Paige
I don’t think so. True democrats will remain loyal to their principles and not pimp them to a puppet.
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
LOL, Bob!
Whats truly scary is people are so awe struck by her that they cant see just how crazy Hillary really is. IMHO she makes Bush look normal!
Posted by: IslandGirl | June 1, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
So now Hillary people are complaining about Obama getting 4 more delegates in Michigan that were Hillary’s, when they were pressing hard for Obama getting no delegates at all. And unless four is somehow the magic number that will put Hillary over the top, I believe this is rather pointless argument. Yeah, it’s a sham, but so was the whole Michigan primary.
What Hillary wanted was to give zero votes to Obama in Michigan, saying the votes were for “Uncommitted.” Like I believe that in the entire state of Michigan that ZERO people would vote for Obama. Please, would the person who has the great misfortune of being named “Uncommitted” come forward and claim your votes. And I suspect, that since the name Uncommitted has been forever tainted by the Michigan primary, that the name Uncommitted has about the same chance of making the Top 10 Boys and Girls names list as Hillary being President.
Posted by: Mia | June 1, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Come on back down. Both are great Democrats. Why are we shooting each other. We don’t even know what they are agreeing on. Let’s play this out. Do you want another repug administration?
Posted by: Cecil Campfield | June 1, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
A portion of the Hillary supporters really come off as sore losers(Hopefully only a small portion). Question: Is your behavior indicitave of how you taught your kids involved in sports how to be gracious in defeat? Why is it that if you don’t get your way, you stomp and whine and cry NO FAIR? At least I can say that as a true Democrat, I would vote for anyone other than a Republican under the current circumstances. Especially one who plans on continuing the current policy debacles of the Bush administration.
Posted by: Quityourwhinin | June 1, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
I have news for some folks here. The country is not what it was in 92′, or for that matter 2002′. The failures of the social conservative/unililateralist/pro-free trade policies has somewhat altered the character of the country (the succes or failure of free trade is arguable). It is absolutely necessary and factual that people are fed up with the right, and are more likely to take a chance in the GE. How else to reason the rise of the independents during this election cycle. IF Obama receives a realistic percentage of Clinton’s votes and a majority of Independents; he will win the election. The center right policies of the Clintons are out dated and out of touch with the current mind set. The country, due to the economy and Iraq, is smack down in the center, with a little left dust thown in.
Obama will be the next President 08′
Posted by: Hernan Tasies | June 1, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Take off the rose colored glasses and blinders. Obama’s pastors have finished him off. He is limping into a landslide defeat in the GE. No amount of hoping is going to change that.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Change is coming. America, you should be smiling. :)
BEST post on this blog! Thanks! :)
Posted by: IslandGirl | June 1, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Hillary has disenfranchised me, a caucus voter, and she attempted without success to disenfranchise Obama supporters in Michigan and Florida. She has trashed and villified a very fine candidate, and then cried victim when called on it. I DO NOT want a victim in the white house. Obama has done nothing to her. I only had to see her crazed supporters at the DNC to know who is really drinking the Kool-Aid.
Posted by: rozanne | June 1, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
I am no Hillary fan, but I would support her over John McCain in a heartbeat, just as I would hope Hillary supporters will support Barack Obama in the general election. This country simply cannot afford another four or eight years of a Republican presidency. Make no mistake–McCain is no moderate. He is even more of a neo-con and war supporter than Bush. He has vowed to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn a woman’s right to choose. Please, I know this primary has been painful for many, but let’s not forget who the real threat to our nation is. We Democrats must stay united.
Posted by: Anthony | June 1, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
What Hillary did in this election show character, what Obama did was expose character.
She’s winning.
Posted by: Sylvia | June 1, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
HRC, go back to NY and take your accountant with you, you have a lot of bills to pay.
Posted by: jj | June 1, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
AGS345~ Hillary won nothing. It’s laughable that the Clinton camp attacks when it suits them, cries wolf when it’s necessary, promotes asinine memes to further their cause and claims it’s not over til they say so… and then their supporters come along like the Church of the Latter Day Dittoheads TM and say that they won the popular vote. As if that matters. As if it’s true. As if it’s over according to their own candidate.
Try to have a little shame to make up for the complete lack of it by your candidate, could you?
Posted by: ConfuciUS | June 1, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Hillary is playing crude and dirty, She plays like a real Bushie.
This is not what our country NEEDS after eight long years of the Bush legacy!
OBAMA 08′
Posted by: Mark | June 1, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
-Don’t trust her to behave truthfully and honestly with the American public( the take on the Florida and Michigan votes and the popular vote, the sniper story, the past white house scandals)
-Unlikely to run an efficient administration and get the job done alleged experience or not (poor management of her campaign)
-She is fiscally irresponsible (amassing a $20 million campaign debt, with collection agencies after her)
-Her husband’s past is a political embarrassment with his uncontrolled womanizing, sexual harrassment suits, monica lewinsky. Presume he is likely to be caught again.
- The selfish agenda and massive ego.
In the interest of things that matter, thumbs down for this candidate.
Posted by: Paul | June 1, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
In what world is it O.K. to claim the popular vote in Puerto Rico, that cannot legally vote in the general election, and to discount the popular vote in caucuses of states which ARE legally able to vote? And in what world is Uncommitted a person, and therefore would give Obama zero popular votes?
Yes, the world in which Hillary and Bill rule the world and rules are only followed when they stand to benefit. A world that no longer exists. Their games have caught up with them and now they are turning their rage onto the world.
Posted by: Mia | June 1, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Re: Obama is left-wing-
The Democrats have moved so far to the right in the last 20 years, that anyone as ‘middle of the road’ as Obama will seem to be ‘left-wing’. It’s high time we pulled the ‘middle of the road’ back to where it belongs, which is far further left than it is now.
Left wing wackos? Look where the right wing has got us over the past two decades, especially the Bush years. Time to end that myth and reconsider that easy meme that liberal = bad. That’s just cheap talk. Look around and you will see what bad is and who caused it
Posted by: msirt | June 1, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
hernan tasies
They used to hide the fact, But now I dont think they care.
Posted by: Mandy | June 1, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Republicans are running scared!!!!
They know Barack will win!! and then new Dem’s will win the seats that they now hold. Run scared bush and McCain your days in office are numbered. The Dem’s will take back over and change things for all!!!! for the better!!!!!!
I can not wait to cast my vote in the General Election for Barack Obama in Nov. then that night when he wins have one hell a party to Celebrate the new President.
Posted by: Lauren | June 1, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
How come she is still in so much debt if she is more popular? She had all the big donators and some questionable donations like people under bridges donating money in the beginning of her campaign. She claimed she was being outspent 2 to 1 in the big primary states and has lent her campaign over 11 million dollars and took money from a child. If she is so popular you would think she would have at least her debts paid off and money to spend. I highly doubt she is as popular as she claims otherwise she wouldn’t be “begging” for money.
Posted by: Lene' | June 1, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
One more thing, those of you who are looking for Hillary to run for the presidency in 2012, you will be running someone who does not hold an office because the people of New York State are fed up with her. She has done absolutely nothing for them except name a few public buildings. Obama is polling very well in New York State and will win the state. He will also win California.
Posted by: rozanne | June 1, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
To those folks chanting “Hillary or McCain”, “Democrats for McCain”, etc.
Take a moment and think about what you are saying. Hillary is a true-blue Democrat, and a vote FOR McCain is a vote AGAINST Hillary. Do you really think that’s what she wants?
Do you really think McCain will support Universal Health Care? Or Veterans Rights? or Social Security (remember, McCain wants to ‘privatize’ Social Security)? How about education for your children?
To McCain, the middle class are ‘disposable’ people. Do you really think voting for another Bush Administration is honoring Hillary’s accomplishments? Win or lose, Hillary has made astounding ground, and we need to unite to make her goals realized.
Vote as a Democrat — not just the Presidential ballot, but in all State and Local elections. We need all the help we can muster to correct the disasters 8 years of the Bush Administration have showered on us.
Should a Republican win the presidency this fall, we will need a majority of Democrats in the Senate and House to override the presidential veto on bills that matter to us.
Vote a solid Democrat ticket.
Posted by: Mickey | June 1, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Hillary and her supporters are playing off of one another’s political sickness; as a result, both are keeping the Democratic Party in a divide. Both are selfish and are enablers just as if they were druggies. Pelosi, Dean and Reid will hold the intervention on Wednesday.
Let’s get President Chaney and Vice-President Carl Rove out of Office once and for all!
Posted by: Cassandra | June 1, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
DemsRSelfDestructing-
Only because of people like you.
By the way do not EVER lump every single member of a demographic into one category.
I am a white, middle aged, working class female who is voting Obama.
You don’t speak for me.
Posted by: GENERALIZATIONS NEED TO STOP | Jun 1, 2008 9:20:43 PM
You don’t speak for me either!!
I am a white working class late forty something women and strongly support and will vote for Barack in Nov.
Posted by: Lauren | June 1, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Mickey–
Great post. I think this is what will happen. The few fanatics on these blogs are not an accurate representation of your average American.
I think the general is going to be a slaughter. The republicans are going to be defeated en masse.
At that point, the dems better get it in gear and do something or it will be short lived.
Posted by: Ellen | June 1, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
I seem to recall Hillary’s claim to leading the popular vote was contingent on winning something like 65% of ca. 2,000,000 votes in Puerto Rico. Looks like she’s going to win about 68% of more like 500,000 total votes today. What does that do for her popular vote math?
Posted by: topchap | June 1, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Reason, if you really remember the Clinton years, they were great economically we stopped deficit spending everybody who was willing to work could and oil was $20.
I don’t know which part of it you didn’t like.
Posted by: AGS345 | June 1, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Thanks Hillary. You didn’t count my state in your fake “popular vote” total. We voted but they called it a caucus. So my vote and everyone else in my state didn’t count. Should we demonstrate outside your headquarters to reinstate out votes in your screwed up brain? You can’t pretend something isn’t there just because you want to. Are you schizoid?
Posted by: mlk | June 1, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
HILLARY DOES NOT HAVE MORE POPULAR VOTE!
How many times do we have to say it.
She’s EXCLUDING caucus states and counting ALL of the votes in MI and the ones for her in FL.
I really can not believe that people STILL support this woman. Heck I’m surprised even the racist voters still support her. No, wait they are voting for McCain.
Posted by: Realist | June 1, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
1) If you voted for Hillary in the primary and you are planning vote for McCain in the general, I have some thoughts. If McCain wins (and you seem to be for this outcome)
1) Collect coat hangers because they will be the only option for those women who choose to terminate pregnancies.
2) prepare to see more people die in the never ending war that you voted for. If one more soldier dies because you voted for McCain then that death is on your head.
3) I hope that your house and car are paid off because if the economy tanks under McCain and you lose your job, that will be the only way you will be able to keep your house and car.
Finally. . . what makes you think if McCain wins in 08 that he will lose in 2012. If he wins he will have the power of the presidency behind him and the chances are good that (like all incumbants) he would win a second term and thus Hillary would lose as well. You all seem to be willing to play a bet that won’t pay.
Posted by: Jonathan | June 1, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
The left wing of the party is satisfied with their candidate. Those of us who aren’t, will look to other candidates outside of the party. Blind loyalty to any party is stupidity. Please see Reagan Democrats for reference.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
I cannot understand how Clinton supporters have totally lost their bearings.
First of all, the rules are the rules, and once they were set, should not have been changed along the way just to accommodate the losing candidate. The counting of the “votes” in a primary race whose voters had been told their votes would not count is not a credible race! There is no way to get meaningful vote counts out of a race which was discounted before it started.
Secondly, you should be scared of continuing any dynasties in this country. We do not need a Clinton dynasty any more than we need a Bush dynasty, especially when NAFTA backers would continue in office to doom our economy still further.
Thirdly, it should have become clear to you that Senator Clinton, like Joe Lieberman, should not even be considered a Democrat after having the audacity and insanity to prefer Insane McCain over a sane and intelligent Democrat like Obama. At that moment, I stopped considering her a Democrat. She is really a DINO and a traitor to the Democratic party. SHE is the one playing the race card, not Obama. And her insinuation that she is hanging in there to catch the nomination because hint, hint, Obama might not survive his candidacy, is absolutely dastardly.
Lastly, anyone who votes for McCain needs a brain transplant. The resulting McBush III reign will kick what’s left of the U.S. economic and moral carcass down the cliff.
Posted by: Pat | June 1, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Paige, Yes Hillary lies, and will steal or cheat to achieve her objectives.
Posted by: jeffp | June 1, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Even through the end, the Clintons do not have a clue. The fact that Clinton was the only viable candidate on the ballot and 40% still voted uncommitted should have been her first clue that she would have to earn it.
They can dismiss it as sexism, left-wing conspiracies, or Clinton talking past his bedtime.
The Clintons are not the Democratic Party’s saviours. They would not have been able to “rescue” our economy or bring us back to the 90′s. Change is coming. Change is now. You can either join us or get left in the dust.
Posted by: Mia | June 1, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Hate to break it to you but if HIllary keeps this up she will be pretty much dead in polotics
Posted by: Adam | June 1, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
As a democrat, I am outraged that the Democratic Party becomes an Obama Party.
These people have been treating Hillary so badly. They even demand her to campaign for Obama in the general election in the name of party unity after he is SELECTED by SDs.
I have seen Chicago mafia style politics is coming to Washington.
Posted by: jp | June 1, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Mrs. Clinton will drop out when the Superdelegates announce their support for Obama by the end of next week. At that point, she will have no choice unless she wants to end her political career. Pelosi and Reid will crucify her if she attempts to start a intraparty war after knowing that Obama has the Superdelegate commitments he needs to win. No matter what Mrs. Clinton does, she can’t steal the nomination from Obama. If she appears intent on taking down Obama out of spite, the Democratic Party and the MSM will all come donw on her like a ton of bricks. She will be publically eviscerated, and her political career will be over.
Posted by: osage | June 1, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Dear Mack,
Didn’t Reagan put the economy in the worst shape it had been since the great Depression?? Or will that be the current administration?
Posted by: GetReal | June 1, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Yes, she wins the popular vote IF you don’t count the caucuses AND if you exclude all those people in Michigan who put ‘uncommitted’ because – per the agreement Obama as well as Hillary signed – Obama took his name off the ballot.
But why try to reason? Hillary’s going to carry this to the convention with her ever shrinking base of cultists.
They’re the new Church of Hillarytology. L Ron Hilliard.
Screw em. I’m not playing nice with fanatics.
Posted by: Monjoose | June 1, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Blacky
Does that mean that only half of him will be elected. That means that someone else will have to be co president.. but wait then there will be one and a half people president. So we have to get someone else half white and half black
Your mother. Will she run with barack?
Posted by: Omentum | June 1, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
HILLARY SUPPORTERS – ARE YOU LISTENING …
… To the hateful way Obama and his supporters are treating you? Will you remember the insults in November?
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Why do Clinton and McCain supporters often sound like people who are going to give their political power away to a parent-type (i.e., Mommy or Daddy will know what to do)?–while Obama supporters often sound like people galvanized by the hope that someone savvy, SENSIBLE AND DIPLOMATIC will be the mouthpiece for the general collective Voice of America? Just a thought.
Posted by: Curious | June 1, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Maybe no one has noticed but both candidates have such a close popular vote that it is a virtual tie, yet the Obama people say we’ve won because we are CLOSEST to the number of delegates needed. Obama is already planning to take office, he is offering a public servant position to Hillary because she is a woman and you know WOMAN can never be as good as a man. The fact is that OBAMA can not close the deal without the support of a few bought superdelegates—which means he will LOSE this election.
Posted by: Anne | June 1, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
osage–
You are 100% right. The powers that be will not allow a convention floor fight. Anyone who even thinks about it will pay a huge political price and not just Hillary.
The democrats have learned a thing or two and there is not a chance in he** that a floor fight will happen.
Posted by: Ellen | June 1, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
As a democrat, I am outraged that the Democratic Party becomes an Obama Party.
These people have been treating Hillary so badly. They even demand her to campaign for Obama in the general election in the name of party unity after he is SELECTED by SDs.
I have seen Chicago mafia style politics is coming to Washington.
Posted by: jp | June 1, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Osage:
Smartest post on here yet!
Posted by: GetReal | June 1, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Barry lied
You will not see her in 2012 or 2016 she has destroyed any chance she had, she blew it BIG. and she knows it she is only staying in in hopes that the supers will say to Barack take her as your VP. If he does that it will be a major mistake on his part. He will lose with her on his ticket. He can not put her on with him it will be his undoing!!
Barack will win !!!
He will be the President on 08
Posted by: Lauren | June 1, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
S
What a repulsive suprise. Still dishing out the GOP koolaid. I would like to think that Dems are alot smarter.
Posted by: Omentum | June 1, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
I have seen Chicago mafia style politics is coming to Washington.
If you would take off those rose colored glasses you would see Hillary is the God Father!
Posted by: Scott | June 1, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
To all these Obama haters about Florida and Michigan. Hillary and Obama, everyone agreed to the penalties. Now the usual Hillary, going back on what she said and agreed to. Hillary just can’t be trusted. If it is not the way she wants it she will do her best to destroy it, no matter who it hurts. one other thing, the black vote that Hillary has alienated ( with what her and Bill have said). No democrat can win without a big turnout from them. Obama does not have the… let’s say it as it is, the ‘blackophobe’ vote. He does very well in Colorado ( very white). you can tell the intelligence of these people that are willing to throw the country farther into the toilet and vote for McCain simply because Hillary does not win.
Posted by: Nick | June 1, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
DemsRselfDestructing
Have you ever noticed how easy it is to spot a Republican mole masquerading as a ‘Democrat’ supporter?
First, they make absurd claims, guising their claims promoting a Republican as if it came from someone who cares about America.
Second, they SHOUT, as if speaking louder would make their distortions more true.
Third, they are talking.
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
I was no fan of Reagan, although Carter didn’t leave people with much of a choice. BTW – I was too young to vote in that election.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
There is one reason Hillary is pulling out all the stops to get this nomination—
Whoever the democratic nominee is will win in November. She knows it. Everyone knows it. Even if she has to cheat to do it, she knows she will still win. She knows Obama will win. Any democrat would win this year PERIOD.
It is her last best chance to be president.
She won’t be back in 2012 because Obama will be running in 2012 for his second term. By 2016 you just never know what could have happened, I mean RFK was assassinated in June.
Posted by: The Truth | June 1, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
“I will lead the popular vote, he will maintain a slight lead in the delegate count.”
Clinton leads by 8% in delegates.
She’s “slightly” wrong.
Posted by: dorkenergy | June 1, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Yes Hillary, you won the popular vote and ZERO people voted for Obama in Michigan. I think that just about sums up the will of the people. Oh, and thanks for insulting my intelligence.
Posted by: Jay | June 1, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
The dems are having a rough time because there were two GREAT candidates to choose from
On the other hand the GOP just had to hold their nose and pick the only person that would be competitive.
Posted by: Omentum | June 1, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Obama supporters are afraid. They see a republican around every corner. It’s not the republicans that you need to watch out for, it’s the millions of Democrats that will not vote for Obama in the GE.
Posted by: Mack | Jun 1, 2008 9:06:13 PM
It is your actual phrasing. Straight off of Rush, Hannity, and Coulter. If you want to make their point, don’t use their EXACT phrasing.
Posted by: Rita | June 1, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
I voted solid Democratic party since 1971 in every senateand houseyou know the elections hardly any one bothers to vote in. I have worked the polls,phone banks,donated gone to fund raisers so I owe this party nothing they owe me thats the problem when you see a race like this that can trash a President that held office for eight years and show no respect for a first lady of that party and play all kinds of games with thier buddys in the dc press the big boys you know the ones who lied about the war then I owe them nothing. I hope we end up like in 1980 it would be justice.
Posted by: Bishop | June 1, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Obama will be the nominee for keeping a clean, positive campaignm and for having CLASS. He could have used her tactics and used what the Republicans were waiting to do to her had she been nominated.
He could have used the Peter Paul campaign funds scandal;
the some of the controversial presidential pardons of:
Almon Glenn Braswell, pardoned of his mail fraud and perjury convictions, even while a federal investigation was underway regarding additional money laundering and tax evasion charges. Braswell and Carlos Vignali each paid approximately $200,000 to Hillary Clinton’s brother, Hugh Rodham, to represent their respective cases for clemency. Hugh Rodham returned the payments after they were disclosed to the public. Braswell would later invoke the Fifth Amendment at a Senate Committee hearing in 2001, when questioned about allegations of his having systematically defrauded senior citizens of millions of dollars; and
Marc Rich, a fugitive, pardoned of tax evasion, after clemency pleas from Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, among many other international luminaries. He was required to pay a $100 million dollar fine and waive any use of the pardon as a defense against any future civil charges that were filed against him in the same case. Critics complained that Denise Rich, his former wife, had made substantial donations to the Clinton library and to Mrs. Clinton’s senate campaign. Emails uncovered during the course of the investigation revealed that her final donation was provided a year before Scooter Libby requested that she approach Clinton for a pardon. According to Paul Volcker’s independent investigation of Iraqi Oil-for-Food kickback schemes, Marc Rich was a middleman for several suspect Iraqi oil deals involving over 4 million barrels of oil….
the list of scandals go on and on.
And yet Classy Obama took the high road.
And that is why he will be President.
Posted by: HighRoad | June 1, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Hillaryrious. I love it how the Hillary folk give us insight into what the GOP is going to do to Obama. Of course, If Hilldoll is the nominee, they’ll just run a respectful campaign against her. They’ll agree not to make to much of gaffes and inconvenient little scandals. The Hillapeeps have gone mental. They’ve somehow forgotten how Hilldoll is the most polarizing figure in politics for the last sixteen years. After this primary, she is not only disliked by right, but also the left, and a good portion in the middle. She is depressingly unelectable.
Posted by: Hernan Tasies | June 1, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
May I add in my 2 cents? Nothing u say or do will EVER please the CLintons. They ARE, as by now many would believe, the RIGHTFUL OWNERS of the Presidency. Forget all those Bush/Clinton/Bush….mumbo-jumbo. The WH is THEIRS. But let me warn you all NOTHING will be done if she were to rule, as nothing was done when she had her nose in every WH affair/issue. I think it is that rush of adrenalin and greed for power that is altering their conscience of truth and reality. Being half white and half minority, I think that it is time to alter the course of superiority. At this moment in time, the world needs healing, images need to be restored, awareness of OTHERS’ EXISTENCES should be promoted – this can only be achieved if we get off our high horse and mingle with the OTHERS who populate this planet. Sadly, the same is not being promoted at home, so we bear the right to that chip on our shoulder as the USA. Not something our ancestors had in mind, not something the founding fathers had in mind. But who cares? Greed and power are all that matter, so what if it attained at a dear cost.
Very sad indeed.
Posted by: trups | June 1, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Bishop
it will be the same if you and other Clinton supporters cave to the new left.
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Four quick points:
1) Neither Senator Obama nor Senator Clinton is the devil incarnate. As I tell my students, the moment one breaks out an ad hominem attack, the validity of all of the other points a person makes does not simply fade away; it disappears like the image on a just-shaken Etch-o-Sketch.
Just think about this…What is the worst thing that can be said about you or some of the people with whom you have associated? [I have an acquaintance who once told me that she has an uncle who could -- dare we say? -- rub someone out for her. Does that make her or me guilty?]
2) Senator Clinton has received more votes than Senator Obama. However, she does not lead in the popular vote because there is no en total popular vote for the Democratic primaries.
In a decathlon, you may have the best running times; however, if you have not performed well in the field events, then you do not win.
The decision is in the hands of superdelegates now.
3) The Rules and Bylaws Committee did not take delegates away from Senator Clinton. They determined that, unlike the Florida vote, the Michigan vote was not valid. Therefore, no delegates had been granted. The charge was therefore given to the Michigan Democratic Party to come up with an equitable solution to distribute all of the delegate, all of whom were at that point uncommitted.
Most of the time, neither or none of the aggrieved parties will be completely satisfied with a compromise.
4) I am listening to “London Calling”, the great Clash album. Strummer sings the line, “Let fury have the hour. Anger can be power. Don’t you know that you can use it.”
You can use anger, fury, to your advantage. However, it has its time; it has its targets. When fury is directly toward people simply because they disagree with you, then no matter how many words are typed here or on other sites, no one will listen.
Posted by: walser1966 | June 1, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
I see the FANTASY RIDE by the Clintons is alive and well .I cant wait for next week for all this to be over.
When Barack won 11 STATES in a row this was over . had she realise the math wouldn’t work, be like John Edwards and bow with GRACE.
Non of this bad blood would be going on .Look now! Edwards supporters are behind Barack, it seems like such a long time ago barack and edwards were competing for the nomination.
With Hillary insistance to carry on she actually did set up her supporters for a let down at the expense of the PARTY.
Had she BOW out a longtime when the math was impossible to be caught; the healing would be at about 90% NOW; and soon would have been healed like the Edwards SUPPORTERS
NO one is bigger than the party but dont tell the Clintons this.
.
Posted by: jerry | June 1, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Sorry Rita, but I refuse to listen to any of them. They are way far right of my views.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
walser1966: Well said!
Posted by: Turku Wren | June 1, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
If BO is the presumptive nominee and has been so since NC, why is he losing KY,WV and now PR by blowout margins? Why are the Democratic votes voting for HRC in large numbers? Shouldn’t he be sewing it all up like McCain did for weeks? Why was the KY and WV white blue collar Reagan Democrat voters even more harsh in their rejection of BO comapred to OH? While PR does not vote in Nov, it indicates that HRC will carry lationo votes while BO will lose them to JM. Why on earth is the Democratic party chosing the best winning moment since Nixon to nominate BO who simply cannot win over key sections of the voters who are going to determine our next President?
Posted by: Warren5678 | June 1, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
This will be a very exciting week, The name of our next president will be announced, I need some champagne!
OBAMA 08′
YES WE CAN
Posted by: ExcitingWeek | June 1, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
This year the democrats could run Donald Duck and win the General.
The republicans are rotten dog meat in 2008.
This is why we see all these republican trolls on here. They are scared and rightly so.
Their reign of terror is about to end.
Posted by: DOG FOOD | June 1, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
This is for Hillary supporters and the gloating republicans masquerading as Democrats on this forum: In every contest, there emerges a winner and one or more others lose. It is not the end of the world unless you have become bitter and so disillusioned that you can now begin to tear down your opponent because he/she won. I just wonder what would happen if your opponent happens to be your own flesh and blood. It is sad. The rules and fact are stubborn things. They just refuse to go away. This has further convinced many people that even with the number one name recgnition, Hillary has turned what should have been a mere beauty contest into a complicated matter! I’m serious.
Posted by: egbinrin-ote | June 1, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Relax people, there will be a democrat controlled house and senate!
Meaning that if I can’t vote Hillary in November and McCain wins, am I worried? NO!
Here’s the only thing that really worries me. Obama with that much power. The unknown of Barack Obama and his pledge to Muslims with the control of the congress is scary.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: Krissy K | June 1, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Rita:
Lets see, you’re referencing:
Rush (presumably Limbaugh), one of the greatest Republican radio distortion artists in recent history, who touts his distorted political views nearly daily.
Hannity (presumably Sean), a radical right wing (or is it ‘wrong’ wing) extremist who cannot get a job on a respectable cable show, but has to settle for the FoxNoise Network.
And Coulter (presumably Ann), a Republican political radical that has been repeatedly shown to plagiarize and distort statements, who speaks fast and circles the issues when caught in a ‘mis-statement’.
Did I miss anything?
And you are listening to these?
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Hillary Clinton will NOT win in 2012. Many, many voters will not vote for her after this campaign especially after she and her supporters do everything in their power to derail Barack Obama and the Democratic party.
So Hillary Cinton supporters who are too vindictive for unity, vote for McCain and expect another 8 YEARS (YES 8) of Republican rule. McCain will take your vote and laugh all the way to the supreme court along with the far right. Enjoy your new family: Cheney, Bush, Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, FOX News……..
You will give McCain/Republicans your vote, but believe me, they will NOT give Hillary Clinton their vote.
Posted by: Independent04 | June 1, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
As evident by all the crazy posts from both sides, the democratic party is in for an internal rumbling bound to destroy it from within.
Glad i’m not a democrat.
Posted by: independent voter | June 1, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
“More people across the country have voted for our campaign. More people have voted for us than for any candidate in the history of presidential politics…”
Ok Hillary, that’s fine. You can say this if you count votes from the Michigan “primary” in which Obama’s name was not on the ballot. You’re free to make this claim. However, if you make this claim you must also agree that more people have voted AGAINST you than for any candidate in the history of presidential politics, given that 238,168 Michigan voters wanted “uncommitted” instead of you.
Posted by: booriddly | June 1, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
What kind of idiot switches from Hillary to McCain? The same kind of idiot that pays zero attention to actual policies that will affect our every day lives for the next 4 years. Any true Democrat will understand the McCain policies will put women’s rights back to the 1960′s and accelerate the implosion of the US economy in 2009. Does that matter to you, or would you simply like to stomp your feet in a hissy fit and throw all logic out the window in November.
Vote Democrat, or watch the Supreme Court bring aboard 3 more Scalia-clones.
Posted by: Dino | June 1, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Freethinking Democrat
You should give serious consideration to voting out some of the super delegates who went against their state’s primary results. Maybe that way, we can have an honest election some day.
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
With Dashile, Leahy, Edwards, Kennedy, Casey and people like this behind him I think your Muslim charge is unfounded. He is a Christian you know.
I have spent the last year looking into all the Candidates. I will vote Democrat this year.
Posted by: Independent | June 1, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Dino
Roe vs wade will be overturned as well
Posted by: Omentum | June 1, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Clinton doesn’t quite get it. She has racked up a lot of penalties. In the great American game of baseball, there are penalties for illegal play, for disregarding the referees, for trying to change the rules, for lack of teamwork. Now she pleads “keep me in the game!” but the team needs a win, her team managers think she’s a maverick, the other players want her to take responsibility, the referees have given her too many warnings, the opposing time knows they can beat her so they want her to stay in, the public that cares and is watching doesn’t want to lose the game in November because of her stalling.
Posted by: Sallie | June 1, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Dino
Better than Obama judges!
Posted by: S | June 1, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
CD= (guessing that stands for cross-dresser?) still waiting for you to tell me why I should support clinton in the GE…. Hillary supporters are like the front row of a willie nelson concert- 12 teeth and 124 legs.
Posted by: JOhn | June 1, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Dino-A bunch of Neocons disguising themselves as Democrats.
Posted by: Paige | June 1, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
walser1966
Thank you for your well thought out post. Its very humbling. Now I must go say Three “Our Fathers” & Five “Hail Marys”
I feel guilty, when I say things I shouldnt.
Posted by: IslandGirl | June 1, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
To all of you Obama supporters. the black vote is only 12% of the population….how many whites and republicans does it take to screw up an election…many from the DNC and 1 Obama!!!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Dino:
Well spoken.
Posted by: Mickey | June 1, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Any “Democrat” voting for McCain is really a pathetic Rove joke pretending to be a Democrat.
Posted by: Real Democrats | June 1, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Oh here we go again!
The fear-mongering of the Obamabats.
Give it a rest already! Nobody is buying what you’re selling.
McCain is HATED by the conservatives. He is too far left! He is too liberal for them.
I feel sorry for you that you are buying into the website designed to get all the repubs fired up over their candidate.
If he is so radical and so extreme, why on earth is Lieberman endorsing him?
I know, I know, facts get in the way. You would rather resort to using fear to make me vote for Obama.
Guess what, it isn’t going to work.
Hillary ’08 or against Obama ’08
Posted by: Krissy K | June 1, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
I have never seen such a poor loser as Senator Clinton. It is sad really. I keep hoping she would get the message, that maybe someone would tell her she has lost.
I mean that meeting yesterday is the kind of thing a Clinton in their prime could have won easily. But she does not have the support in the party anymore. Her husband does not have the support.
She has lost the election, not through manipulation by the media, party leaders, or dark forces. She lost it through gross mismanagement. Her advisors did not know the rules. Her campaign burned through money on posh suites and lavish meals. She took things for granted. She started believing it was hers for the taking.
And now she does not want to let go. Everyone knows it is hard to lose but really, get a grip.
Posted by: Bob F | June 1, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Its Puerto f.N Rico WHO CARES!!!
They can’t even vote come November,
I know barack did’nt WASTE much money there because they play no part in the general election.
Thats like winning France or Canada they have NO say in the General Election. if the Clintons want to ride that be my guest.
it will be all over by next week.
Posted by: WhatEVEEEER | June 1, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Here are some names and words the Obamots don’t want to be reminded of:
Rezko, Wright, Ayers, Bittergate, sweety, “typical white people”, Godd^mn Amerikkka”, etc.
It’s not Hillary’s supporters you have to worry about..it’s the Republicans and Fox News who have vowed to eat your IDOL alive!
Posted by: urmom | June 1, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
I thought maybe I could come hear and find some sane people looking ahead to a new day. willing to debate the issues.
Posted by: Independent | June 1, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Why doesn’t Hillary get the fact she can not win against Obama? Are people filling her mind with ideas, or is she just completely delusional?
Posted by: IslandGirl | June 1, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
“I feel terribly sad for Obama’s supporters..”
Barry – do you understand the meaning of the word PRINCIPLE? Of course Obama could lose but so can Hillary. So it comes down to those principles that informs ones vote and for me it’s her vote to authorize Bush to go to war with Iraq. That in my opinion was either poor judgment or political calculation. The result is 4000+ dead young americans and a near bankrupt country. Hillary would have had my vote if it had not been for that war vote and never saying she was sorry or regretted the vote.
Posted by: $bill | June 1, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
For you all Clinton hardcore supporters….please go and sign up and vote for McCain come November. Then if McCain wins watch as he takes away womens rights and other freedom bestowed upon you. Watch as he sends more of your sons and daughters into Iraq and watch has his policies will mimick more of a fascist totalitarian regime.
Yes go ahead and do so. Your country is depending on it.
The reasonable and wise masses known as the majority of America will vote for Obama. Obama will run circles around the brainless McCain and his Republican assholes who have ruined our country.
So stop threatening us that you’ll vote for McCain. I know most of you won’t.
Posted by: Jordan | June 1, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Ms.Bosnia’s Rule:
To win the White House One must win Puerto Rico.
Posted by: sylhet | June 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Obama supporters are the ones sitting next to their trailers dring from a brown bag waiting for the mailman to bring the welfare checks and food stamp!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
If you Hillary people are so vindictive and childish as to vote McCain just to spite Obama, then take a good look in the mirror. You need to grow up. Sheesh.
Posted by: Voter Dude | June 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Yes, it is important to get the facts straight about what happened yesterday. The DNC was not authorized to give either candidate what they asked for. They were only authorized to validate a state’s proposal as meeting the DNC standards.
So what they had to do was vote up or down on the state proposals. Which is what they did. The states started out with zero votes for both candidates.
Michigan tendered a proposal for an alternate way to determine fair representation for the states voters. The committee voted to approve it as valid, after looking at the data the state party used to come up with their figures.
No one took votes away from anyone. Clinton got four more votes in an invalid contest than she got in a valid DNC sanction of the state Party proposal of what they thought was a more accurate representation of the will of Michigan state voters.
This was between the DNC and the states. The candidates got to weigh in, but they actually had no specific role to play and the DNC could not have sanctioned one of their plans; that would have been outside the rules and would have led to the very thing some are now charging, that the committee actually decided about delegates. No, the states did, which is their role.
The rest is spin.
Posted by: KTMseattle | June 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Vote for McCain
You teens will be definitely on their way to iraq.
Women your right to choose is GONE.
Barack’s policies are virtually the same as hillary’s and virtually the complete opposite as McCain’s
There must be other reasons why folks want to vote for McSame. Please enlighten me folks.
PLEASE
Posted by: Omentum | June 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Don’t forget about the trolls. I’m sure there are some Republican geeks trying to stirr the roast in this forum.
Posted by: Hernan tasies | June 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
According to Barry Hussein Obama there are 57 states. Does that mean there are 5 more states left to vote after SD and Montana?
According to Barry, John McCain would the a 4th term of the Bush’ administration. I wasn’t aware Bush spanked the democrats 3 times. I thought it was only twice?!?! Oh well, what do I know? I’m just an low income, uneducated “typical white” voter.
Posted by: typical white voter | June 1, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Well I for one do not think this party is right for all of us who out grew the perfect world share the wealth thing because most of Obama supporters are the same ones who say share the wealth but never do at least that has been all I have seen in my life time and people who have wealth they are not looking to share it they are looking to make more .When they put thier feet on the floor in the morning that is the first thing they have on thier minds.We brag about are country how come you never see the wealthy trying to move here we get the poor and we are becoming like a third world country with a media and goverment that are corrupt.IMO
Posted by: Bishop | June 1, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Exactly Krissy K. I’m still trying to figure out how he’s going to keep us in Iraq for 100 years when he’ll only be president for 4.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Hey murray- Typical white trash change artist, huh? The majority of the welfare, too lazy and too stupid to work, want $45 an hour to push a broom idiots are white…hence, white trash. Too stupid to work, but perfect to vote for Clinton.
Posted by: JOhn | June 1, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Omentum says your ‘teens will be going to Iraq’ .
Failing to mention you have to VOLUNTEER to join to go.
He is just like all the Obama supporters.
They lie and manipulate the obvious.
Posted by: cgeast | June 1, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
I suggest before you vote McCain you check his voting record. He has voted 100 percent with Bush. Good luck with that if you think McCain will change things.
Posted by: Independent | June 1, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
This woman is so sick —-What is it about the little word LOST she does not understand.
This freaken mess has gone on long enought and come Tues night the supers are going to put her out of her misery.
Posted by: older person | June 1, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
so let’s see…
he doesn’t leave his church and he’s this raging anti-white bigot in disguise…he leaves the church and he’s just another politician????
If you’re Obama, there are no right decisions to make according to a Hillary supporter.
Posted by: KWill | June 1, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Obama even could have race baited Clinton and brought up the case of Bill’s black son, Danny Williams, who is now 13 and going to a private school in Australia. Danny’s black mother, Bobbie Ann Williams was a prostitute in Little Rock and named Bill Clinton as the father.
When Clinton would go for a jog and take a little break from his duties at the governor’s mansion, there was at least one occasion in which Bobbi Ann serviced him in the bushes.
Unlike Suzanne Coleman, whose 7 month pregnancy ended wth a gunshot to the back of her head, Bobbie finished her pregnancy.
He looks just like Bill, and he was a cutie as a baby. Bill even had toys delivered to him when he was small.
He looks just like Bill, and he was a cutie as a baby.
You know that would have fed right into the racist who hate anything that is of blackness.
Yep, Obama could have gone there…but he didn’t
Posted by: HighRoad | June 1, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
typical white voter
He really didn’t mean to say 57 states.. He meant to say 47 states. Not sure if you know this but there are only 50 states. That means it would impossible to have 57 states. Use you fingers.
Posted by: Omentum | June 1, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Clinton supporters will vote for Mc Cain.
Not for spite.
Because he is actually qualified to be president.
We dont want another useless carter term.
Posted by: cgeast | June 1, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
There are over 1000 abortions done every day in this country..that is a lot more than the deaths in Iraq…Murder is murder..abortions are done way after the third month of pregnancy…that is murder!! Consider that…Roe v Wade law is abominable!!!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Blacky, the black sheep:
Like I said, you can always tell a Republican mole.
First, they make absurd claims touting a Republican candidate.
Second, they SHOUT, as if speaking louder makes their confusion less repulsive.
Third, they are talking.
Posted by: Mickey | June 1, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Clinton voted for “Wa(R) … Obama opposed it. This is an example of JUDGEMENT over so called EXPERIENCE.
In the ’07 State of the Union address, when Bush said, “The su(R)ge is woking”, all (R)z + Hilla(R)y stood up an applauded. So much for Hilla(R)y’s, “if I knew then what I know now”, argument about supporting the “W”a(R).
That’s why I DO NOT support Hilla(R)y. You can make that about gender and victimization if you want, but it just isn’t factual.
Snerd
Posted by: Snerd Gronk | June 1, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
She’s white and can do whatever she wants, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Looks like the trolls from the ObamaPost, I mean the Huffintonpost have highjacked this site. Oh well, last I heard lots of them were paid. go figure!
Posted by: can't make me choose barry | June 1, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Senator Clinton needs to stop misleading the american people by claiming that she has won the popular vote… WE MUST NOT LET THAT STAND
because then she will try to make it appear as though the superdelegates would be ‘stealing’ the nomination from her.
The results of the tainted primaries must not be counted as they included voter supression and supression of voter choice because of the ruling of the DNC, the body with authority in the nomination process.
Posted by: lb | June 1, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
I agree with Stacey,
Obama/Webb looks like a winning ticket in the GE.
Posted by: Suzanne | June 1, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
cgeast
Like myself I joined the U. S. marines to defend the constitution of the united states of america. Thank god i got out before we started dying for the constitution of iraq
Posted by: Omentum | June 1, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Wouldn’t you people feel much more comfortable over at huffpo or dailykos? Most of you don’t appear ready to face the reality that not everyone worships your idol.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Can anyone here give me a single reason to vote for McCain??????
…..
…..
…..
Nope???
There’s a surprise
If the republicans though they had a chance in 2008, do you really think they would have nominated a 173yr old loser?
Posted by: Help Me Pls | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Omentum:
Wow! You have 50 fingers? You must be almost as confused as McCain on the ‘pre-surge levels’!!
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Barry Lied, Virginia could very well go democrat with Obama. That state is really changing and the republicans are scared of that. Plus Gov Kaine and Jim Webb support Obama and they are very popular. It would not surprise me at all if Obama wins it in the GE. And you’ve got to be kidding with California going republican.
Posted by: lisa | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
One other thing that the Clintonistas will never mention- the majority of the “successes” legislative wise of his tenure were republican sponsored bills… not to let the facts get in the way of their fanaticism…
Posted by: JOhn | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
You know I’ve seen several people proudly waving the fact that Hillary won Puerto Rico, West Virginia, and Kentucky by landslides. I won’t rehash here why West Virginia and Kentucky went that way but it shouldn’t be a surprise with Puerto Rico either. The Clinton “brand” is practially a household brand there. Hillary quite frankly rode that one on Bill’s coattails. So…. while we are talking about landslides lets talk about Obama landslides
Alaska 75.2 24.7
Idaho 79.5 17.2
North Dakota 61.1 36.5
Kansas 74.0 25.8
Colorado 66.5 32.3
Minnesota 66.4 32.2
Georgia 66.4 31.1
Illinois 64.7 32.8
Maryland 60.7 35.8
Virginia 63.7 35.5
Wyoming 61.4 37.8
Mississippi 61.2 36.7
DC 75.3 23.8
Virgin Islands 89.9 7.6
Hawaii 76.1 23.7
And these are just the ones where he got over 60 percent of the vote… There were several other states. Some quite populous where he got just under 60 percent of the vote
Oregon 58.5 40.6
N. Carolina 56.1 41.6
Vermont 59.3 38.6
Louisiana 57.4 35.6
Alabama 56 41.6
Utah 56.7 39.1
S Carolina 55.4 26.5
This all just to say when you go and start touting a victory you have to put it into perspective. There are going to be blowouts. Quite frankly Hillary was on the wrong end on more of them than Obama was. These last several blowouts didn’t need to be as large as they were except that Obama made a decision to let Hillary play through while he moved on to the GE. What he essentially did was hand her the ball and walk off the field. What she did was run back and forth down the field with no real opposition and scream “see, I’m making touchdowns”. Those of us who are really paying attention aren’t buying it and I can assure you the superdelegates aren’t buying it. Obama made a decision to conserve his funds for the GE while Hillary went “whole hog” so to speak and drove her campaign further into debt. This was not what I would call the actions of a responsible candidate.
Obama 08
Posted by: Robert E Otts | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Are you all that afraid of a non-white president.
All of you are pathetic excuses for human beings.
I once supported the Clintons. But there is such a lack of integrity, ethics, and class that she in no way needs to be running this country.
She has changed her stance on what should be counted multiple times, told multiple lies, brought up race, appealed to the “ugly” American that votes by color. Then out of the blue it’s sexism. Even with a Woman senate majority leader, a female Sec of State, she claims sexism?
Me thinks the Peter Paul case is going to be a real eye-opener, if she is trying this hard to win, the Clinton’s may be in fear of something.
And you people that will not support Obama when he is the nominee. You will only be part of the problem, not the solution.
So go F— yourselves before you f— this country with 4 more years of this republican BS.
I’ve had it with the lot of you racist, infantile imbecils.
Posted by: Andrew | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Can anyone here give me a single reason to vote for McCain??????
…..
…..
…..
Nope???
There’s a surprise
If the republicans though they had a chance in 2008, do you really think they would have nominated a 173yr old loser?
Posted by: Help Me Pls | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
McCain provided much comedy this week with his getting caught in a lie (I can look you in the eye and tell you we have drawn down to pre-surge levels…), and with all parties, Repub and Dem, admitting this was wrong, he goes on camera yesterday to say he was absolutely right. Senility? Stubbornness? Alcoholism? Whatever it is, it’s going to be a pleasure watching Senator Obama tear him apart in the debates – both on domestic and foreign policy. Has anybody actually seen McCain NOT ready from a teleprompter? He is incapable of remembering the most simplest of speeches. This will mirror the first debates between Nixon and Kennedy – I would hate to be a Republican this year.
Posted by: Dino | June 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
According to Barry Hussein Obama there are 57 states. Does that mean there are 5 more states left to vote after SD and Montana?
According to Barry, John McCain would the a 4th term of the Bush’ administration. I wasn’t aware Bush spanked the democrats 3 times. I thought it was only twice?!?! Oh well, what do I know? I’m just an low income, uneducated “typical white” voter.
Posted by: typical white voter | Jun 1, 2008 10:02:42 PM
You sound bitter. Were you clinging to a gun while you typed that?
Posted by: Bob F | June 1, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
She has been misleading the people of this country all of her life. She is white and can do it, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Mack,
All the racists did come from Europe. And usually, it was the dregs of society that came here and founded this backwater.
There are no black racists. The idea that you get upset because people justifiably say that your race was the perpetrator of the horrendous racial injustices of this country is sad and pathetic. Why on earth would it upset you that some blacks are still resentful of white culture? It should make you think. If you’re not a racist, why would you think they were talking about you?
Why would it offend you? Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
Posted by: Artemis | June 1, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
I think the clowns thats saying they will VOTE for Mccain are really Bush supporters.
No one in their right mind would want what took placefor the pass 8 years ,
LOST JOBS
RECESSION, lead to home foreclosures etc..
LOST LIVES for what by our brave men and women in the service .
WASTE TRILLIONS on a uncessary WAR and ruin our Economy.
ANYONE CLAIMS TO BE A DEMOCRAT WHO WANTS A REPEAT OF 4 MORE YEARS OF THAT AND YOU WILL GET IT,
JOHN MCBUSH IS NOT SHY ABOUT IT.. HE DOVE RIGHT IN BED WITH GEORGE BUSH AND SAID THE POLICIES STAYS AND WILL CONTINUE .
ASK YOURSELF THIS WHY DID YOU GET INVOLVE WITH THIS YEAR GENERAL ELECTION! CLAIMING THE COUNTRY IS IN A MESS AND WE NEED CHANGE.
IS YOUR CANDIDATE MORE IMPORTANT THAN POLICIES AND IDEALS AND THE DIRECTION OF THIS COUNTRY.
CAN AMERICA BE THIS STUPID??/, I KNOW THEY VOTED BUSH TWICE.
MAYBE I JUST ANSWER MY OWN QUESTION.
.
Posted by: mike42 | June 1, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
John, for your information I am a college graduate, own my own business and am not looking for a black guy to take away my Escalade and turn my heat down to 62 and not use my airconditioner!! The reason I am a Clinton Supporter is because I know an unqualified, anti-american liar when I see one…that would be Obama, biggest flip flopper, fence jumper I ever saw! And his wife…can’t imagine that thing as first lady…what a joke!!!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Ickes just said today that an uncommitted vote in Michigan was not a vote for Obama. Give me a break! Everyone knew a vote for uncommitted was a vote for Obama.
It’s unfair for the Clinton campaign to claim a popular vote victory while giving Obama zero votes from one of the contests.
Two reasons SDs won’t endorse Clinton: (1) she’s had a hard time raising money in the primaries which does not bode well for the general, (2) her campaign has fought dirty, i.e. kitchen sink strategy, scorched-earth strategy, using “nuclear option” to gain delegates, fear tactics (3 a.m. ad, Osama image used in an ad).
Posted by: Cindy | June 1, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
If you are a disgruntled Dem, don’t vote for McSame, vote for Nader.
Posted by: Earl Eakin | June 1, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Just remember what happened to the Filly…
Posted by: Lisa | June 1, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Yawn. More scare tactics and fear mongering from Obamabats.
Pretty hard to vote 100% with Bush when you are known as a maverick!!!
He breaks from his party quite often to write and vote with the dems. Yup, real extreme there (eyeroll)
Let’s see…who was it he wrote the McCain-Feingold Bill? Doh!
Lieberman endorses him….Double Doh!
So really, give it a rest with your misinformation and lies. That must be the half of us dems that are with Obama, the fear mongering liars.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: Krissy K | June 1, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Sooner or later this will end… and ALOT of people will have to… GET A LIFE!!!
Posted by: pity | June 1, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Donna Bazille, the most staunchest SuperDelegate that endorses Obama said tonite the race will not be over Wednesday, that it will go to the convention . She seemed to imply that Obama will be wise to ask Hillary to run as his VP because of so much dissension in the party. She said he can’t win the GE without the votes of the Clinton supporters. This race is far from over and no telling what is going to happen. It’s going to be interesting though.
Posted by: david from texas | June 1, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Omentum:
You was a Marine? Which war was that? Or were you one of those ‘tweeners’ who never left the US?
The war in Iraq is a civil war, precisely to create a ‘constitution of Iraq’. Or weren’t you listening when Bush said we were over there to force a democracy on the MidEast, whether they like it or not?
Coerced democracy is not democracy.
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Find it unbelievable that votes count in states we were told wouldn’t – where Obama didn’t get to campaign and she had the advantage of name recognition.
What a falsehood that she cares about the voters, she is so willing to disenfranchise voters in Florida where the only voters who showed up were those fighting the property tax amendment.
Posted by: Snarky | June 1, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
She’s white, and she can do it, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
JOhn: “… Omentum says your ‘teens will be going to Iraq’. Failing to mention you have to VOLUNTEER to join to go.”
SG: Yes a “POOR” staement, but rather accurate from that context.
Snerd
Posted by: Snerd Gronl | June 1, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
She’s white, and she can do it, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Sorry Rita, but I refuse to listen to any of them. They are way far right of my views.
Posted by: Mack | Jun 1, 2008 9:47:32 PM
Well, I listen to Rush and Sean everyday. I, also, read everything on Townhall everyday. When someone repeats this BS I can contribute it to the original author. Most people seem to only read or listen to what reaffirms their own beliefs. I prefer to be the fly on the wall, so to speak.
Posted by: Rita | June 1, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Omentum:
You was a Marine? Which war was that? Or were you one of those ‘tweeners’ who never left the US?
The war in Iraq is a civil war, precisely to create a ‘constitution of Iraq’. Or weren’t you listening when Bush said we were over there to force a democracy on the MidEast, whether they like it or not?
Coerced democracy is not democracy.
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
I truly believe Hillary Clinton is trying to save face by making it appear that the nomination has been “stolen” from her rather than admitting she campaigned poorly, and had to result to “dirty” politics to win. In fact, she is the one who is attempting to hijack the nomination from Obama, but of course, that is acceptable because she is a woman, and if anyone questions her tactics are just sexist or misogynists.
I don’t pity HRC because when this is all over she still have multi-millions of dollars more than I, and a great job, and only a damaged reputation.
However, the people that have been used and abused in her selfish ambituous quest for the White House may have some long lasting effects, of which she is well aware.
It’s ashame that her purpose and plan will be circumvented, and Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States of America. President Obama. It even sounds right.
Posted by: MyAudacity | June 1, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Murray – if you are so well educated then you would know there is very little difference between Obama’s and Clinton’s polcies so you’re hosed with your SUV and 62 degree AC – Sorry, but your argument does not hold much water.
Posted by: Paige | June 1, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Wow, there are a lot of very scared people on this blog.
And republicans you should be afraid, be very afraid.
Your posts here make it incredibly obvious that you are republicans.
The democratic party will be united and you will be defeated.
Posted by: I smell fear | June 1, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Bob F,
Of course I’m bitter, you id!ot! I’m white and live in a small town. Hey, I least that’s what Obama said!
(*_*) (*_*) (*_*) (*_*) (*_*)
Posted by: typical white voter | June 1, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
think the clowns thats saying they will VOTE for Mccain are really Bush supporters.
No one in their right mind would want what took placefor the pass 8 years ,
LOST JOBS
RECESSION, lead to home foreclosures etc..
LOST LIVES for what by our brave men and women in the service .
WASTE TRILLIONS on a uncessary WAR and ruin our Economy.
ANYONE CLAIMS TO BE A DEMOCRAT WHO WANTS A REPEAT OF 4 MORE YEARS OF THAT AND YOU WILL GET IT,
JOHN MCBUSH IS NOT SHY ABOUT IT.. HE JUMP RIGHT IN BED WITH GEORGE BUSH AND SAID THE POLICIES STAYS AND WILL CONTINUE .
ASK YOURSELF THIS WHY DID YOU GET INVOLVE WITH THIS YEAR GENERAL ELECTION! CLAIMING THE COUNTRY IS IN A MESS AND WE NEED CHANGE.
IS YOUR CANDIDATE MORE IMPORTANT THAN POLICIES AND IDEALS AND THE DIRECTION OF THIS COUNTRY.
CAN AMERICA BE THIS STUPID??/, I KNOW THEY VOTED BUSH TWICE.
MAYBE I JUST ANSWER MY OWN QUESTIONS.
.
Posted by: mike42 | June 1, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
She’s white, and she can do it, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Earl Eakin
Nope. I will vote for Hillary!
If that isn’t possible, I will vote against Obama.
I see Nader, who I would want to vote for, as a helper to get Obama in the white house. I don’t want him in the white house at any cost. Any cost, incase you missed it.
A vote from Nader is a vote for Obama. How do you think Clinton won in ’92? Take all of Perot’s votes, which would have gone to Bush, and give them to Bush. Bush wins by a landslide.
I will not go that way. I can learn from them and not be mocked the Wed after the election.
Hillary ’08
Posted by: Krissy K | June 1, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
They’re trying to bury his humiliating defeat today and his continuing pastor problems by hurling insults.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
If BO is the presumptive nominee and has been so since NC, why is he losing KY,WV and now PR by blowout margins? Why are the Democratic votes voting for HRC in large numbers? Shouldn’t he be sewing it all up like McCain did for weeks? Why was the KY and WV white blue collar Reagan Democrat voters even more harsh in their rejection of BO comapred to OH? While PR does not vote in Nov, it indicates that HRC will carry lationo votes while BO will lose them to JM. Why on earth is the Democratic party chosing the best winning moment since Nixon to nominate BO who simply cannot win over key sections of the voters who are going to determine our next President?
Posted by: Warren5678 | June 1, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Cindy, Hillary’s campaign did not do any dirty tricks in this campaign! the dirty tricks are being done by Obama’s campaign behind the scenes and Obama pleads innocent. The only thing that Hillary has done is stayed in the race and that is the thing that is p!ssing off all you Obama babies!!
Earl…I would not vote for Nader if he was the only one on the ticket…I would stay home!!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
I don’t think Hillary is trying to steal the nomination. I think the voters of America have been pretty much split down the middle for both candidates. The only difference is the StuperDelegates and the DNC which have had the cards stacked against Hillary from day one. I applaud her for taking this to the convention floor to be resolved. She has every right. I agree, Obama cannot and will not win in the GE without the support of Hillary Clinton’s voters. I think the Obama supporters need to realize this. Obama, himself, is beginning to realize it as well. It wouldn’t surprise me if he ask Hillary very soon to be his VP, that is, IF he wins the nomination.
Posted by: david from texas | June 1, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
She’s white, and she can do it, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
I have to agree here.
Obama will win the nomination.
But for the DNC to give delegates to someone not even on the ballot is INSANE,
but even more insane is to TAKE AWAY delegates from someone who earned them on the ballot……..and give them to the guy who WASNT on the ballot.
The dems will NEVER live that one down.
Posted by: cgeast | June 1, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
They don’t add anything of value, so I’d rather do something else with my time.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
the will of ALL the people and ALL the states is Obama… by a lot.
Posted by: dl | June 1, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Rita:
It was not my intent to insult you. Coulter, Hannity, Limbaugh, and the rest of the Republican spin ‘talking heads’ just say things that are so – well lets say I don’t agree with them.
Personally, my favorite idiot to make fun of is that Bill O’Reilly on FoxNoise. A couple of weeks ago, he got into an argument with HIMSELF on the air, and lost.
I applaud you for having the intestinal fortitude to listen to this hogwash. I cannot.
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
McCain cannot and will not win.
He looks horrible on camera and he is a very angry man and cannot hide it. I for one don’t like being talked to through clenched teeth. He speaks in a very condescending tone and comes across as completely ignorant on every issue.
This is a youth oriented culture and no way does the crypt keeper’s older brother win.
You people who claim to be Hillary supporters are so obviously republicans. You are fooling no one.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
TODAY’S RASMUSSEN
McCain 47% Hillary 44%
McCain 46% Obama 45%
Hillary is not running as well as Obama against McCain in the national polls.
All the electability crap is nonsense.
Both candidates are statistically tied with McCain right now.
Polls mean jack this far from the GE. Electoral guessing maps are also meaningless. No one knows how people will vote six months from now. The ‘experts’ have no idea what will occur during a six month campaign.
Posted by: SAME STUFF, DIFFERENT DAY | June 1, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
She’s white, and she can do it, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
McCain will privatize Social Security and wants to make medicare private. He doesn’t support the new GI Bill for vets. Hey – all the Hillary people-if you vote for McCain as you threaten, then you were never a Democrat anyway. McCain will reinstate the draft to fight his wars, your sons will go to war, you will not collect Social Security, tax breaks will be madel permanent for the rich and you will die broke and your kids will work at mCdONALDS. oh and your kids will have baby after baby or coat hangar abortions. go ahead, I dare you. vote for McCain. I for one won’t and I also don’t want a prez that lies about bullets in Bosnia. By the way, what church does Hillary attend. When you find out you will be creeped out. Scary.
Posted by: karin | June 1, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
cgeast stated:
“But for the DNC to give delegates to someone not even on the ballot is INSANE,
but even more insane is to TAKE AWAY delegates from someone who earned them on the ballot……..and give them to the guy who WASNT on the ballot.
The dems will NEVER live that one down.”
I agree 100% with you on this point. And, by not living it down, it has caused an even further division in the Democratic party, one that will be fatal in the GE. I’m afraid that we will have 4 more years of GOP rule.
Posted by: david from texas | June 1, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
“They’re trying to bury his humiliating defeat today and his continuing pastor problems by hurling insults.”
BEST AND “MOST TELLING” POST OF THE NIGHT!
Posted by: Puerto Rican 4 Hillary | June 1, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
What rule allows the DNC to take 4 delegates Hillary Clinton had already won in Michigan?
That is simple enough.
The DNC did not have to take any Michigan delegates from Hillary. Until the proceedings on Saturday, HILLARY HAD NO MICHIGAN DELEGATES WHATSOEVER. There was no legal primary in Michigan because the primary was not sanctioned by the Democratic party rules and the courts have ruled that with regard to internal party matters such as this one, the party rules have the force of law. Any other finding would mean that Michigan could hold their primary around Halloween LAST YEAR if they should so choose.
The exact same thing can be said of the Republican party rules. They too have the force of law for internal matters such as the permissible primary dates. The Republican party chose to impose a 50% penalty instead of a 100% penalty, but the exact same legal principle is at work.
So, starting with the ZERO Michigan delegates that both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton had as of last Friday, the Rules and Bylaws committee used their authority to grant both parties a number of delegates commiserate with their estimate of the relative support enjoyed by Obama and Clinton in Michigan at the time of the illegal primary.
=====================================
Who gave them the authority to take away 100% of the delegates from Michigan, anyways?
Harold Ickes for one. He was one of the people who wrote the rules, in effect before any candidate had entered the race, that REQUIRED 50% sanction for any state that held their primary outside the window permitted under the rules.
The same rules granted the Rules and Bylaws committee the authority to take away the rest of the delegates.
Posted by: Hillary's MI delegates | June 1, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
I am New Yorker, who has voted for Mrs. Clinton on 3 occasions, and I definitely will never ever so do again.
To all of you here who state your support for her and vow that you will never vote for Obama. How would you like it if she does as you want her to end up with the nomonation. Do you honestly think that she can win if the Obama supporters do not vote for her?
I started this as a Clinton supporter. I voted for her in the NY primary, but I have had it with her. She is in the position she is now in not because of any underhnad condust by Obama, but because she underestimated him and his team. She ran a very poor campaign early in the game.
It saddens me to see the number of people here who are slaves of the Clintons and behave as though Mrs Clinton is the second coming of Jesus Christ.
Worse of all I am appalled by the conduct of the Clinton supporters here, the racism, and general low life comments are truly scary. I do hope that these are Republican supporters trying to muddy the waters, but I am sure that many of them are really Clinton supporters. I saw a videao of an elderly New Yorker who in the most blatant way exhibited the worse kind of racism I have seen in my 58 years. I am ashamed to admit that these people who I thought that as Clinton supporters as I was shared my position. The truth it seems is that Mrs. Clinton is now fast becoming in the eyes of her supporters(many posting) a female David Duke. HOW SAD.
Posted by: New Yorker | June 1, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Can somebody please tell Hillary that Obama hasn’t actually been campaigning with her in Puerto Rico… or spending the days upon days in one locations as she has… he has a campaign to run against McCain and is leaving her to whatever tickles her fancy!!! Even gave up votes to her in FL and MI that he didn’t have to, just to keep the peace….
Posted by: origood | June 1, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Thank Obama and his supporters to make democrats UNITED against him.
Posted by: jp | June 1, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Throw a bucket of water on her already. Ding-Dong….you know the tune.
Posted by: Get Real | June 1, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Obama lost KY, WV, and PR because those people are historically anti-black and really dumb. And these aren’t opinons, they are facts, last in education and first in Klansmen.
PR is different, being hispanic, I know most oldschool hispanics hate blacks.
And PR is basically a thrid world country outside of San Juan.
If you think other wise, I can guess three places where you might live.
Posted by: LatinObama | June 1, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
“But for the DNC to give delegates to someone not even on the ballot is INSANE,
but even more insane is to TAKE AWAY delegates from someone who earned them on the ballot……..and give them to the guy who WASNT on the ballot. The dems will NEVER live that one down.”
OK, cgeast, what is YOUR solution? How would YOU compromise? Hillary 69, Obama ZERO?
Posted by: Glenna | June 1, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Two days to go and then the Superdelegate flood begins. Can’t we all pretend this whole nomination process never happened? Let’s each one of us wake up on Wednesday with fresh eyes and judge Obama and McCain on their own merits, characters, and platforms instead of through the skewed lens of Clinton talking points. When I read the quotes taken from the protest on Saturday I dubbed it the “HRC Talking Points on Parade”; all their greatest hits were accounted for. Attention my fellow US citizens: Please let’s not forget it’s silly season and no politician is infallible; do not be afraid to use your own judgment as well as Google and Snopes to base your opinions on Truth, not Truthiness (thanks, Steven C, for that oh so apt word).
Posted by: Grainne ME | June 1, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE
BARACK H. OBAMA
Deal with it, Clinton thugs!
He got just as many votes as she did, more really.
We will outnumber you real soon. You and your argument will be made moot on Wednesday.
Posted by: Hillary Who?? | June 1, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
She does not care about unity. She does not care about her party. She does not care about the country. All she cares about is what she feels is rightfully hers – the presidency. She is a selfsih woman.
Posted by: Amy | June 1, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
This from Gallup today:
In the 20 states where Hillary Clinton has claimed victory in the 2008 Democratic primary and caucus elections (winning the popular vote), she has led John McCain in Gallup Poll Daily trial heats for the general election over the past two weeks of Gallup Poll Daily tracking by 50% to 43%. In those same states, Barack Obama is about tied with McCain among national registered voters, 45% to 46%.
Posted by: david from texas | June 1, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
There is nothing ABC news can do to stop Sen. Clinton from becoming President. About three years ago a well known televangelist, Perry Stone Jr., told his congregation that God spoke to him and said Sen. Clinton will be the next President. This information can be obtained from one of his published works on CD entitled “Strange Patterns of Recent American Presidents.” On track 7 of this CD, he tells us that Sen. Clinton will once again be in the White House. So give it up ABC News. And Barack, your days are numbered.
Posted by: brianerickson65 | June 1, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Obama is only losing because all three clintons are throwing everything at him at a time when so is Mccain
because once again Hillary puts herself ahead of the soldiers who need to come home, the children who need healthcare, the middle class who has been baring the brundt of wealthy tax cuts, the rights of women being protected in the supreme court…
and all the rest…
because her presidency has been more important than the issues she has said were why she should be elected.
The real numbners show that Obama is most likely going to blow John McCain out of the water if you look at all the numbers and compare them historically…
(even his primary promises of defection which are almost the same as Bill Clinton’s in 92…sorry clinton supporters to burst your bubble on that one but it’s true…you aren’t original with your spite right now because your candidate lost…but too much at stake and deep down you all know it and if you have kids there is no way a vote for McCain makes there life better…) once the spite fades in most of you who are adults in control of your frustration… you all will go back to putting America first.
but a few on here will be of the fringe that won’t luckily most Clinton supporters are not that but just great Americans who have grown comfortable with a nominee…. …but put the issues over their own spite.
Posted by: dl | June 1, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
This woman is nuts. She doesn’t lead in the popular vote, unless you ignore all those Obama supporters. I am outraged. I used to have some respect for her. Now I’m pretty sure she’s pathological.
Posted by: melissa | June 1, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
I also appeal to the SDs to end this fight and bring a conclusion to this
madness. Hillary does not care if she
ruins the Party just as long as she can
seemingly get her way. This contest was
over a long time ago. Super Delegates
we need your intervention to stop this madness by Hillary and her followers.
It is not good for the Party.
Posted by: Plainspeaking | June 1, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Let’s see, the entire Clinton family holed up in Puerto Rico for two weeks, begging for cash to pay for it after the fact. And Puerto Rico can’t even vote in the general election. Some strategy there.
All the while, she promised to make Puerto Rico the 51st state. This promise comes up every primary season. It was she that used it, not Obama.
Posted by: Get Real | June 1, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Image Matters…you best your ass it does!! And the image of Obama is the same image as an anti-Christ! He is out to ruin this country and the DNC is helping him…screw the DNC and Obama ..I will vote for a republican for the first time in my life…and very, very happy to do so…Stupid Obama said today that he has always been honest about where he is coming from…what a bold face lie…just a liar!!!And that ignorant priest said today the words he said were not from his heart…more bullsh!t…all a bunch of liars…Obama is a loser!! More shoes to drop before this is over..and the blacks will blame it all on Hillary!! What a bunch of losers these Obama supporters are…blacks must not know good people from bad people!!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
brianerickson65–
Some crazy lying preacher has a “vision” that Hillary would be president. Why didn’t you say so sooner, Oh MY GOD — we must then immediately make her the nominee.
Televangilists are lying con men. Clearly you don’t utilize all of your brain cells.
Posted by: Hillary Who? | June 1, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Warren, first of all W Va and Kentucky will vote republican in the GE so who cares. And do you really have to ask why they voted for Hillary in blowout margins.
Posted by: lisa | June 1, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
but even more insane is to TAKE AWAY delegates from someone who earned them on the ballot……..and give them to the guy who WASNT on the ballot.
The dems will NEVER live that one down.
_______________________________________
Whats more INSANE, that they allow delegates to be seated after HIllary cry foul when she GOT BEHIND in the delegate COUNT, they more or less change the rules in the middle of the game ,
Thats like the REF in a basketball game putting the RIM down to 5 feet from the 10 feet just for the Clintons.
Imagine if the ROLES were reverse and barck pull this stunt ,Oh yes Barack have too much class he would have bow out a long time ago.
This election will be remember as the CLINTONS being the biggest LOSERS and cry babies of all time.
they started off with 146 plus million and predict victory by FEB … and got buried in a campaign ground game by barack for the AGES.
if he plans to run the country like his campaign America is in very good hands.
you cant say the same for the BILLARYS.
Posted by: cyberdog | June 1, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Wah wah…wah wahhhhhhhhhhh..wah..wah…waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Vote for McCain then…just pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeez stop whining! Your guy, er, gal lost! Go ahead with your stupid plans and let another idiot run the US into the ground for another 4 years. Instead of passing voter ID laws, maybe someone will come up with an Idiot Test to weed out people like you morons posting your stupid comments here! I’m out of here, Peace!
Posted by: HeardEnoughWhining! | June 1, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Murray190–
You are a life long republican. You are fooling no one.
Any real Hillary supporter who votes for McCain will be gagging while they do it. Not telling us all what a great guy he is.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
JOhn,
Your point is right on. Hillary Clinton now wants to paint herself as the victim of a primary election that she has lost. She has not won the “popular” vote; had this been the case, then she would be leading in the pledged delegate count, which she is not.
Regarding the mess with Florida and Michigan: what is absolutely appalling is that no one is talking about the fact that OBAMA (and all the other Democratic candidates) took his name off the ballot IN HONOR OF THE DNC’s DECISION TO PUNISH THE STATE FOR MOVING UP ITS PRIMARY ELECTION WITHOUT PERMISSION. All the candidates took their names off the ballot in honor of that decision as well except one–HILLARY CLINTON–who blatantly defied the DNC’s rules (curious thought why she said in Novemeber, 2007 that “Michigan doesn’t mean anything.”) Except now it does because she’s losing the nomination.
Florida is a different case: none of the candidates could remove their names from the ballot because Florida has a law that states that a candidate CANNOT remove their name UNLESS they sign an affidavit stating that they will not campaign IN ANY OTHER STATE.
In continuing her relentless pursuit to win at any cost, Hillary Clinton has demonstrated greed, selfishness, and self-interest. I supported her since she was First Lady and voted for her in my home state primary in February; however, her antics, desperation, and lack of integrity made me start listening to Obama. Now that I’ve heard what Obama has to say, he no doubt is the absolute best candidate for president and outpaces Hillary Clinton by a mile.
Posted by: lulu | June 1, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Thank Obama and his supporters to make democrats UNITED against him.
Posted by: jp | Jun 1, 2008 10:28:58 PM
———————
I agree 100%
Posted by: Pat | June 1, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Obama is the only decent and intelligent candidate worth voting for. Voting for McCain to continue a Bush third term is a crime. For Hillary, who changes the rules to suit her needs with every rehearsed speech, is an insult to feminism and to those seeking a progressive and democratic alternative. The venom manifested in the comments posted above seems enough evidence for such angry bigots to disqualify themselves from voting on Nov. 7. ( Professor Emeritus, Critical Theory and Geopolitcs)
Posted by: George Gregory | June 1, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Get Real…Sorry..the Puerto Ricans do NOT want to become a state…that is why they do not get to vote in the GE..the DNC said the only way they would be able to vote is to become a state and they said NO WAY, JOSE! Look it up!! Get educated!~
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
PLEASE NOTE—
All of Obama supporters are NOT black or college students.
Stop cherry picking the polls.
Obama leads in INDEPENDENTS and REPUBLICANS crossing over.
Obama leads in EDUCATED voters who make over $50,000 a year.
Obama is making huge inroads in all other demographics. Once Hillary disappears that will only increase.
All you nut jobs need to go find another hobby.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
and DAVID from Texas
what did those numbers ay about the majority of states? you know the ones that Obama won…
and do those numbers putinto converstaion that barack holds those numbers while being the focus of attacks from the Clinton campaign and surrogates AND McCain
who say nothing about Hillary…imagine if she was the nominee…
this all has been a joke.
the numbers show (the primary turn outs alone…besides Puerto Rico) show massive sway to the dems…and in most states mostly to Barack.
Hillary had a low ceiling and lost in her strongest demographic the democratic party outside of that her numbers plummet. She has done this all without one scandal from her past ever being raised…and she has lists of those…whether you like to acknowledge them or not…can you imagine if she had been the nominee…how they had been just waiting hoping she got the nod to release the dogs…
one good thing she did… she immunized obama…unfortunately for her Obama didn’t immunize her back
Posted by: dl | June 1, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Facts:
Obama is ahead in the popular vote because you have to include the caucuses. The numbers are estimated by the number of delegates.
Obama has won more states.
Obama has more delegates.
Obama has more superdelegates.
These are facts that are proven and recorded.
While I am a woman who admires Hillary’s attempt to win the nomination, my feelings about her have dropped every day that this nominee is not selected. The longer she goes, not to win but for her own ego, the more likely any democratic nominee will not win.
Unless you have a personal supply of oil, a refinery in your backyard, a job you will never lose, a house with no mortgage or not know of anyone in Iraq (or feel any safer knowing that we laid out a preemptive attack for no just cause in an area that stores the bulk of the world’s oil), you would not vote for the Republicans because of this primary. Any voter who would vote for more of the mess we are in because their nominee is does not win, needs to re-read the saying about not cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Posted by: Anne | June 1, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Yes that’s it my Operation Chaos people! Pretend you’re Clinton Democrats and tell people to either vote for Clinton or McCain!! No one will suspect we’re just telling people to vote for McCain since we know Clinton won’t win.
For good measure, let’s also claim the democrats are horrible for not GIVING Clinton the Nomination! They don’t need to know that even if she got full MI/FL and obama got no MI, she’d still lose so shhh… just attack Democrats and maybe grandpa John won’t get blown away this fall!
Posted by: Rush Limpbaugh | June 1, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
im so sick of hearing hillarys “logic” and vote math how she is ahead in this or that and only this and that counts.. blah blah
im tired of hearing about pastor this and that… hey lets boycott obama because his pastor is a nut and go to mccain who has two nutty pastors.. blah blah
obama cant win the general against mccain we need hillary so lets vote mccain.. what? we need internet here is your signs!!!
my favorite is we suppport hillary for the issues but i will vote mccain before obama because he was in a war, and vote away from those issues – and how dare most black people vote obama thats racist but most women are giving hillary a vote isnt sexist… here is your sign!!! wear it with pride on the sinking hillary ship , maybe you will be lucky and she will lie to you all the way to the bottom….
Posted by: melissa-ny | June 1, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Since the Clintons are cheaters/crybabies and got their way with the delegates getting seated
Who speaks NOW for the million of voters who didn’t come out and vote beacuse they were told it wouldn’t count and to stay home. And for the others who vote in the Republican party and for other candidate for fun.
Afterall everyone was told and understood it wouldn’t COUNT.
Those VOTERS should be outrage at this decision to sit these DELEGATES.
Posted by: Ashley32 | June 1, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
YOU GO GIRL! KEEP FIGHTING HILLARY CLINTON! THANK YOU PUERTO RICO AND THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT TO EXERCISE YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE. THANK YOU HILLARY CLINTON FOR YOUR PERSEVERANCE AND YOUR DEDICATION TO FIGHT FOR ALL AMERICANS AND ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN SUPPORTING YOU ALL THIS TIME. GOD BLESS YOU AND I PRAY THE SUPERDELEGATES WILL MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION AND CHOOSE YOU TO BE OUR DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT. I BELIEVE IN MIRACLES. GOD BLESS AMERICA.
Posted by: MG | June 1, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Obama is the only decent and intelligent candidate? You haven’t been following along too closely.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
News flash! There is no such thing as an official “popular vote total” for the Democratic nominee.
Each state has its own way of running a primary or caucus (obviously some more legal than others) and total votes can be added up any number of ways, emphasizing some states disproportionately. Gee, isn’t that why the delegate sysyem was designed– to mitigate those differences?
Even Hillary said it is all about the delegates. And it is. Whoever reaches the magic number wins– that new magic number that was adjusted partly on Hillary’s request (and yet she is still complaining– go figure).
Posted by: S.E. Croft | June 1, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
New Yorker:
Well Spoken.
I’m sure there are many McCain supporters on this blog trying to stir up discontent, and it appears you have detected this too. The longer and deeper the divide amongst Democrats can be perpetuated, the more likely we will have another Bush administration when McCain wins.
I too saw an emotional woman protesting at the DNC meeting on Saturday, and like you, her comments saddened me. Not so much because of her claim that she would be voting for McCain, but because she is not listening to the issues. From her outburst, I suspect she would be saying the same thing if Clinton was the leading nominee, except she’d be saying something like “I’d never vote for Clinton, I’m voting for McCain”. Same curse, second verse.
Hopefully, over the next couple of weeks, people will stop shouting and start listening. What does McCain offer to your future? To your children’s future? To America’s future? Is this what we want?
The presidential election is only part of the task at hand. We need to vote Democrat on all contests, National, State and Local.
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Name one policy on which Obama is on the “far left” any of you nutjobs who make that phony claim.
You can’t. He isn’t.
If you’re lying this early, you got nothing.
Big blue wave in November!!!!!!
Posted by: IndianaBlue | June 1, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
You Obama supporters would like to believe the we Hillary supporters are really republicans…is that your way of denying the truth..that we Hillary supporters prefer McCain over Obama! You had better believe it!! Any day, any time!! I am waiting for a website so that I can list my name as a democrat crossing over…country comes before DNC and phoney Obama!!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
HOW STUPID DOES SHE THINK WE ARE????? If the popular vote was all that mattered, the candidates would never have set foot in Iowa or New Hampshire. They would have spent most of their time in California, Texas and the other populous states. You don’t get to make up the rules in the middle of the game. Most normal people learn that in kindergarten.
Posted by: Dodo Bird | June 1, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Anyone who is/was excited about the prospect of a Hillary presidency, who
says they’re going to vote for McCain,
is not thinking clearly.
Obama’s policy stances are almost identical to Hillary’s. McCain would
continue the war in Iraq for many years, would do almost nothing about the foreclosure crisis, would keep Bush’s tax cuts for the richest billionaires, would do almost nothing about the health care crisis.
PLEASE USE YOUR HEADS. It stings when your favorite candidate loses. I was
a strong Biden supporter myself, and I was very disappointed at his dismal showing. But I’m a Democrat. I want Democratic solutions to our problems.
Different priorities from the terrible republican debacle of the last 8 years.
If you vote for McCain just to spite those Obamaniacs, you will be sticking a knife into America’s back. McCain is NOT moderate on most issues. He has vowed to overturn Roe v Wade. He will start a war in Iran. He will let everyone fend for themselves on everything from healthcare to education to mortgages, etc etc.
Let’s all kiss, make up, and stop this disastrous Republican rule.
PLEASE! I’m going to happily vote for Obama, just like I would have happily voted for Hillary.
Posted by: michael | June 1, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Murray: “… The only difference is the StuperDelegates and the DNC which have had the cards stacked against Hillary from day one. I applaud her for taking this to the convention floor to be resolved.”
SG: Honestly this is more the kinda (R)easoning NeoCons use … ‘It’s not MY fault’ accountability.
What about her poorer fund raising, what about Obama’s better ‘ground game’, what about Penn’s sh*tty strategy, she was supported by Rush and a bunch of ditto heads, etc. She had the whole party machinery at her disposal … and she still lost.
Her whining is a very poor reflection upon her. She was beaten by a better politician, with a better message, running uphill against racial prejudice and without co(R)po(R)ate sponsorship …
Snerd
Posted by: Snerd Gronk | June 1, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
murray190 – I think you are right, you are more in line with the republicans.
If you don’t want change – they are the people who most closely match your thinking.
Posted by: Anne | June 1, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Murray190–
We wouldn’t like to believe it, we know it to be true. You are not democrats.
You claim you will vote for someone who does not share any of HRC policy positions. This means you are not a Hillary supporter because why else would you be supporting her? Short answer, you wouldn’t.
Yup, we know you are a republican.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
To those Clinton supporters that are now planning to vote for McCain:
Really? Vote for a man who has supported GWB lockstep for the last eight years over someone who has virtually the same voting record as Clinton? Vote for a man who has pledged to keep our troops and our fortunes tied up in Iraq “as long as it takes”? Vote for a man who will likely choose at least one Supreme Court justice, and who has promised to choose someone just like GWB did? Really??
Posted by: Gracie | June 1, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Barak Obama is the presumptive nominee.Playing by the rules Hillary insiders wrote.Terry McAuliffe wrote these rules when he was head of the DNC.They got beat fair and square by an outsider with a funny name we didn’t know.I know Barak will govern just as fairly and ingeneously as he has run his campaign.
Posted by: Gericault | June 1, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
He got blown out again today. Doesn’t appear that he’s doing much uniting these days, not that he ever did anyway.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Dear Disgruntled Hillary Supporter,
We understand how you must be feeling with having your nomination STOLEN from you.
It’s time for you to leave the Democrats and join us to support McCain in November.
After a few beers, we won’t even care that you’re ugly!
VOTE McCain 08
Posted by: Vote Republican 08 | June 1, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
he wins. she loses, and with it goes her dignity… good riddence
Posted by: unclesmedley | June 1, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
I know that in Kentucky all the dems I know will vote for McCain now.
Hussane Obama better hope the Yankee states can get him threw because we need a true american not a phoney for presidend.
McCain/Clinton ’08
Posted by: porkskin | June 1, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Can’t argue with an Obama supporter…they are too ignorant…either looking for a handout, an abortion or just because he is black…sorry bunch of losers that can only blame Hillary for everything! Hillary won the states that counted..and Obama will not win those in November..so….It is Hillary or McCain..and McCain is 150% better than Obama!! Obama and the DNC are losers too.
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Mack said: “Obama and who? He’s a loser no matter who you stick with him.”
Mack, do you know of any elections/contests lost by Obama? I do not. He definitely is winning Democratic Primeries :-)
Posted by: Man | June 1, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
OK, time for one of the more politically mature Obama supporters to address the Clinton supporters on here.
First off, ignore most of the obnoxious postings by many of my fellow Obama supporters who are just taunting and saying some pretty ridiculous things in a childish fashion. I have seen many like these in the Obama volunteer situations I have been in and just realize many of them are young and are engaging in the political process for the first time, so they’re, let’s just say, overly excited. They do not represent the overwhelming majority of Obama supporters who are pretty much just like you. Many of us are like you and have voted in more than a couple of campaigns . And I was just as troubled by what Rev. Wright said as many of you were. I offer no excuses for Obama there.
Ignore many of their postings which can’t be taken seriously. Calling Clinton “finished” or “toast” is just silly. Obama will win one of the closest primaries in political history. Tens of millions Democrats voted and a these two guys are separated by a few hundred thousand votes. There are over 4000 delegates and they are separated by a little more than 100. There is no question Hillary has been doing better than Obama since March, whereas he was doing better before. It’s really pretty even and this talk of Hillary being finished like she lost by a landslide is fanciful. Ignore it.
The majority of us Obama supporters think the world of Hillary and although we too occasionally got caught up in the competition in the end we are able to realize she is a valuable ally in the Democrat party, as is Bill. They are not ogres or criminals or fascists or whatever the lates insult is. Bill Clinton is still one of my favorite Democratic leaders and has done much for the party.
So trust me — we welcome you into a united Democratic campaign in November. You will be welcomed by us and for those few Obama supporters who haunt blogs and write before they think, just ignore them like we in the Obama campaign have been doing for a while.
We need you to win in November — you are 50% of the primary campaign voters and the loss of even 10% of you would be harmful. I understand the ridiculous taunts on here are counter-productive because I, like many of you, understand the world of politics.
Come join us and help us because we need you and your ideas and your maturity.
Thanks.
Posted by: Adult Obama Supporter | June 1, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Mack–
Kind of hard to beat a brand name and yet, Obama did it.
Clinton had every advantage and yet she still lost. I would say that is the biggest argument against her electability in November.
The inevitable candidate couldn’t even unite her own party and win a primary against a virtual unknown.
This race was Hillary’s’ to lose and that is exactly what she did.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
everyone needs to realize the effect ross perot had on the 92 clinton victory
18.9 percent of the pop vote…
then how they slowlyy lost soooo much for the dems…including having a hand in why we lost the 2000 election…remember “values back to the white house”
and the dems are stronger this year.
Clinton didn’t win because he was a centrist…he ran on a similar platform to Dukakis until the scandals…
this is all stupid.
Obama is the guy and Obama will be President…and maybe the world will start fighting for America again.
Posted by: dl | June 1, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Image matters….you are so in denial…feel sorry for you..Hillary does not want Obama to win and she will not support him fully….and we will help her defeat him!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Hillary lost. Too bad. It’s called Democracy. Time to move on and defeat McWarmonger in Nov.
Posted by: mark | June 1, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Image matters….you are so in denial…feel sorry for you..Hillary does not want Obama to win and she will not support him fully….and we will help her defeat him!
Posted by: murray190 | June 1, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
His earned delegate lead is insurmountable, even if MI & FL are added.
Puerto Rico win means a maximum gain not more than 134 thousand.
The fact is earlier to the PR primary; Barak Obama’s lead was 5 million ahead in terms of popular vote.
Including the caucuses his popular vote is in fact more than 6 million which definitely matters, if push comes to shove or the situation becomes so bad and, it goes to Denver.
Now if you subtract her 134, 000 from Obama’s lead of 5 million, Obama is still the winner in terms of the popular vote.
Remember Earned delegates are not beatable, regardless.
By the way, according to the polls, he is likely to win in MT an SD by a significant margin.
He is also likely to cut into the gain or totally cancel out the gain through his win in MT and SD, Hillary Clinton earned in PR.
Check out TPM, talking points.
I think Mrs. Clinton knows in her heart that the game is over and Obama is a winner.
It is common sense. You don’t have to be a brain surgeon to understand that you become a winner in the democratic primary if you have more delegates.
She knows who has more delegate.
Also, she knows so far she is behind in the popular votes.
She knows all the candidates who ran lost and left, ran lost and left under certain rules.
She knows that the candidate, who is not going to win, who are currently running, are also supposed to run, lose and leave under the same rules.
It is common sense.
She appears to be behaving like little kids who do not accept if they lose and start fighting.
She may be not be accepting out of technical or financial necessities and reason.
That is understandable.
She also has to keep the stakeholder in control.
Her husband and herself have been recipients of very large amounts from the special interest groups in the last few years since his presidency till the present.
I have no doubt she knows it very well, that it is over and, it is just matter of few days, she will find out.
Everybody knows it, in fact.
Posted by: Perfle Lead | June 1, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Pick-and-Choose Hillary… the rules or anything else she talks about.
With regard to this:
“Tell me, what rule on earth takes 4 delegates from someone who has won them, and gives them to someone who wasn’t even in a contest?”
This is exactly the point. What kind of a “contest” is it when the leading contender’s name was not even on the ballot; people who wanted him were advised to vote Undecided. The Undecided got more votes than the other names, other than hers. Yet, she wants the leading contender to get NO VOTES, at all… and she wants them all. It sounds like the same thing that she managed to have happen in New York and Harlem, where allegedly not a single, solitary person voted for Barack [rolling eyes ~ "yeah, right... "].
Corruption and lies will finally come to an end when Hillary ~ who obviously is prepared to take this to the bloodied end… Democratic Party be damned. There’s an elephant in the room and her name is Hillary. Any SuperDelegate worth his or her salt will say something to the effect of, “You’ve GOT to be kidding, sister… you’ve shown yourself for what you are and what you are is not someone committed to the success of the Democratic Party in November; but only committed to your own power-mongering goals.
Posted by: Elizabeth | June 1, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Hillary lost. Too bad. It’s called Democracy. Time to move on and defeat McWarmonger in Nov.
Posted by: mark | June 1, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Murray190-
I’m not in denial. I am fully aware Hillary wants Obama to lose, DUH!
However, if she succeeds you can bet she will be dog food in the democratic party. Hillary in 2012, NO WAY.
If you Hillary supporters inflict terrorism on this country by helping elect McCain, we will remember her in 2012 and she won’t make it past the first two primaries.
Career OVER!
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
I guess it’s just has to be enough to win a narrow victory in the primaries and concede defeat in the GE. Because that is what is going to happen with Obama as the nominee.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Mack – yep, she won today! It’s a little late and a little small, but a win is a win!
Now that the primaries are nearly over, she says – ok, I’m behind in delegates (over 200 behind!) but even if I don’t win by the rules, you superdelegates need to give me the win.
Here’s a few analogies:
Last bat at the World Series and the Clinton team is down 7-6. Their player Hillary hits the ball and gets tagged out 4 inches from home base. She stands up and says – it was 4″!!! Give me the point anyway – I was SO close and I our team is more popular!!
2 marathon runners near the finish line. Runner one crosses the line and runner number two gets there 2/10 of a second later. The second runner says – hey I won!! I got there at about the same time as runner one! I think the rule should be whoever is around the finish line at the same time and has a well recognized name should win!!
I could keep going, but I’m guessing you get my drift.
Posted by: anne | June 1, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Mack–
Well you have five months of that lovely fantasy of yours.
Then get ready for 8 years of President Barack Obama my friend.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Once again Hillary does not respect all the states that had caucuses that Senator Obama won. He has won the most delegates, the most states and if you count all the votes, the most votes. I admire the tenacity of Hillary’s supporters, but I am sick of Hillary and her distorted claims. She insults everyone of us with her false claims.
Posted by: xargaw | June 1, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
A vote for McCain/Bush/Cheney should Obama become nominee is murder by Proxy of thousands of military men and women.
Those who voted for Bush/Cheney, their blood is on your hands:
NAME NOT RELEASED YET Cotner, Christian Gasper, Frank J. Evans, Blake W. Dene, Jason F. Norris, Kyle Phillip Haunert, Branden P. Daggett, John K. Cota, Victor M. Ellis, Jessica A. Ford, Joseph A. Jaenichen, Mary J. Ward, Aaron J. Gonzalez, Alex D. Hicks, Corey L. Casanova, Casey L. Guzman, Miguel A. Kimple, James F. Martinez, Glen E. Nichols, Jeffrey F. Caldwell, Chad A. Pearson, Andrew. R. Tucker, Ronald J. Ezell, Lawrence D. Craig, Clay A. Bolander, Bryan E. McCormick, David P. Marion, Adam L. Mathes, Marcus C. Stone, Mark A. Dix, William T. Whitehead, Shaun J. Ramirez, Guadalupe Cervantes Bishop, John T. Cunningham, Timothy W. Blystone, Ronald C. Harrison, Ronald R. Haerter, Jordan C. Yale, Jonathan T. Campos, Adrian M. Vandergrift, Matthew R. Christofferson, Steven J. Kohlhaas, Adam J. Morton, Cherie L. Brosh, Benjamin K. Eakes, Lance O. Brown, Jason L. Huerta-Cruz, Arturo Richard III, Joseph A. Nelson, Richard J. Opicka, Dean D. Allmon, William E. German, Merlin Capra, Anthony L. Hughes, Jeremiah C. Ault, Jesse A. Tousha, Shaun P. Fairbanks, Jacob J. Hartley, Jeffery L. Rosenberg, Mark E. Smith, Timothy M. Lilly, Michael T. Kazarick, Jason C. Vaughn, Richard A. McNeal, Jeremiah E. Pickett, Emanuel Penley, Shane D. Scott, Stephen K. Wolfer, Stuart A. Burgos-Cruz, Ulises Morris, Matthew T. Griffin, Travis L. Dhanoolal, Dayne D. Gilmore, Terrell W. Jordan, Jevon K. Hall, William G. Bennett, Durrell L. Miller, Patrick J. Jankowski, Charles A. Molina, Joshua A. Candelo, Steven I. Rundell, Gregory B. Gamboa, Joseph D. Delgado, George Hake, Christopher M. Hernandez, Jose A. Rubio Habsieger, Andrew J. Ray, II, Thomas C. Williams, David B. Stelmat, David S. Smith, Tyler J. Maupin, Keith M. Unruh, Gregory D. Elledge, Michael D. Simpson, Christopher C. Brown, Lerando J. O’Brien, William D. Bradley, Juantrea T. Jackson, Dustin C. Samten, Tenzin L. West, Laurent J. Anderson, Phillip R. Burkett, Donald A. Mallard, Torre R. Suzch, Shawn M. Cimarrusti, Ernesto G. Julian, David D. McDavid, Robert T. McIntosh, Scott A. Paniagua-Morales, Jose A. Frost, Christopher S. Mowl, Kevin S. Perez, Orlando A. Phillips, Micheal E. Morgan, Keisha M. Weaver, Drew W. Raudenbush, Nathan R. Mackey, Bryant W. Alvarez, Conrad Bitton, Albert Matlock, Jr., Micheal B. Runyan, Luke S. Groepper, Chad D. Washington, Javares J. Spates, Corey E. Sweet, Jack T. Manibog, Michael T. Martin, Timothy P. Whisenhunt, Jerald A. Willett, Gary D. Souffront, Luis A. Skelton, Bradley J. Van Orman, Timothy R. Osmolski, John C. Baez, Miguel A. Alicearivera, Rafael West, Christopher J. Hardy, Nathan H. Koch, Michael E. Barrett, Chad A. Straughter, Matthew F. Schultz, David E. Norman, Michael A. Craig, James E. Jeffries, Gary W. Marshall, Evan A. Meyer, Brandon A. Young, Joshua A. R. Miller, Mikeal W. Rogers, Alan G. Wilson, Robert J. Crookston, Duncan Charles Birkman, Tracy Renee Sturdivant, Michael R. Whiting, Justin R. Gluff, James M. Burress, Richard B. Schoolcraft III, Jon M. Kimme, Danny L. Sharrett II, David H.
Sigsbee, John P. Lloyd, Keith E. Christensen Jr., Curtis A. Davis, Todd E. Gaul, Sean M. Sanders, Christopher A. Pionk, Matthew I. Dozier, Jonathan Kilian McBride, Zachary W. Hart, David J. Merlo, Ivan E. Pannier, Phillip J. Hanson, Timothy R. Gudridge, James D. Lemke, Jason F. Brown, Menelek M. Olmsted, Andrew J. Casey, Thomas J. Maseth, Ryan D. Anderson, Joshua R. Lacerna, Reno S. Jeffries, Victor W. Berlin Jr., Joseph R. Inman, Rowdy J. Portell, Benjamin B. Tutten, Bryan J. Neesley, Peter C. Howell, George J. Ray, Jeremy E. McDaniel, Juctin R. P. Pratt, Austin D. Lowery, Jonathan A. Smith, Daren A. Kelsey, Samuel E. Naylor, Brynn J. Carter, Mark T. Lahmann, Johnathan A. Pickering, Randy W. Snyder, Adam P. Hernandez, Eric J. White, Dewayne L. Dayton, Kyle Reece, Matthew K. Emery, Blair William Tobiason, John J. Roberts, Allen C. Cortes, Isaac T. Garrison, Benjamin J. Martin, Jonathon L. Henley Jr., Melvin L. Paredez Jr., Alfred G. Ayala, Alejandro Ferrero, Marius L. Lee, Jason T. Nelson, Christopher J. Ganczewski, Steven C. Lewis, Mason L. Burks, Peter H. Banks, Derek R. Booker, Kenneth R. Mason, Casey P. Kruse, Christopher R. Schmidt, Peter W. Sietsema, Ashley Vanek, Joseph M. Franklin, Jermaine D. Tiffner, Benjamin D. Tumanuvao, Lui Ndururi, Christine M. Shaw, Daniel J. Bewley, Kevin R. Davis, Carletta S. Linde, John D. Stenroos, Derek T. Muller, Adam J. Covert Jr., Dwane A. Alger, Tracy Lynn Crowell, Thomas A. Wieger, David A. Schuldheiss, Nathan J. Griese, Louis A. McGovern, Timothy I. Smitherman, Brandon W. McCall, Daniel L. Carver, Cody M. Jenkins, Rush “Mickey” Marshall Lambert, David E. Towns Sr., Robin L. Chitjian, Adam J. Camacho, Anamarie Sannicolas Gresham, Genesia Mattril Garoutte, Erik T. Geiger, Wayne M. Fontenot, Jarred S. Madero, Vincent A. Brown, Micheal D. Martin, Thomas M. Iwasinski, Kenneth J. Monschke, Justin S. Koutroubas, Jason B. Thacker, Nathan Z. Munn II, Donald L. Duckworth, Eric T. Pearson, Samuel F. Clamens, Lillian Lantieri, Jason M. Cady III, Frank L. Burris, Jeremy W. Dillon, Benjamin C.
Meza, Gilberto A.
and many, many more!
Maybe you will have the unfortunate fate a draft and having one of your friends, sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, and other loved ones joining these brave people put to death by proxy of Bush/Cheney.
Posted by: Murder By Proxy | June 1, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Looking back over the posts by murray190, and a question comes to mind:
How do you argue with an idiot like murray190? You don’t. His mind is closed, and no amount of reason will change that. You know, sort of like George Bush, the guy who distorted the intelligence to the point where he believed it himself.
murray190′s rantings aren’t going to change anyone’s mind. The best thing to do is to ignore these comments, and maybe murray190 will go away.
Slurring Obama or Clinton does no good. Imagine your reaction when someone jabs at your favorite candidate. Do their insults change your mind? Probably not. So why would you think slinging attacks between Democrats will change someone else’s mind?
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Typical WHite Voters sai: “According to Barry, John McCain would the a 4th term of the Bush’ administration. I wasn’t aware Bush spanked the democrats 3 times.”
Too bad for you. This country indeed had 3 Bush administrations (all bad).
Posted by: Man | June 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
I am White Disabled Veteran, my wife is white 50 and under Bush she lost her job making 80,000 a year. We now make about half of that and have finally gotten where we can afford the life style we have adjusted too. We now have to adjust to 4 plus dollar a gallon gas, milk at 5 dollars a gallon. McCain may be able to adjust his life style with 8 homes, as I am fighting to keep ours. Our medical has gone up 300 percent since 2001. We have two daughters still living at home going into High School. Do we have a right to elect someone who will turn the court into a 7/2 and over turn Roe vs Wade? Are we willing to give away our constitutional rights? Are you ready for four more years of law breaking, terror threats, Iraq war, disastrous economy? I think NOW is the time to start a little critical thinking. We speak with one voice. In the end we stand together. We have five more months to change our direction. As Independents we would like to stand with you and move our Country forward.
Posted by: Independent | June 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
She can cheat and lie all she wants. She’s white and can do it, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Mack….why are you so obsessed with race? We have a multi-racial candidate, who more than likely will be the nominee. If you think American isn’t ready….just wait and see. Next subject….
Posted by: ggw | June 1, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Barack has been in cruise control since he put his delegate count lead out of REACH for the Clintons.
Thats why in Puerto Rico he just threw a few ads on TV and send his Wife, NO need to WASTE MONEY and TIME , He needs his money for November he has bigger fish to fry,
his CAMPAIGN TEAMS has long been DISPATCH into the BIG states where he will battle in November.
this has benn long over to the point its HIM and McCain that battles everyday
you never hear Hillary name mention , there is no need.
Posted by: 15district | June 1, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Fact: Hillary is a stronger candidate against McCain.
Fact: It is possible for McCain to beat Obama. Right now, McCain is polling better in the electoral college than Obama. Hillary beats McCain in Florida and Ohio; McCain beats Obama in those states. Hillary beats McCain in Pennslyvania, Obama is even in PA IIRC
Fact: The media have been very pro-Obama.
Fact: This is the same media that brought you the war in Iraq.
Doesn’t that scare anyone besides me?
Posted by: BigMItch | June 1, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Even though I’m a republican, I would have voted for Hilary. I won’t vote for Obama. I guess it’s McCain for me (if Hilary isn’t on the ticket at least).
Posted by: L | June 1, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
HRC is a self-serving “B.” She only cares about herself and not the party. And if you think for one chance she is going to represent ALL the people, you have a rude awakening coming. She will do ONLY what is best for she, Bill, and Chelsea. TRUST! She is a spolier and a sore loser. Not once did she think a Black man would come from obsurity and “spank that butt.” OBAMA ’08 and ’12.
Posted by: DRS | June 1, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Hillary’s popular vote claims are demonstrably bogus. And the race goes to the winner of the delegate count. Obama will win SD and MT on Tuesday, and most likely within a couple of days, superdelegates will put him over the top. Then Hillary will come up with some new hogwash criteria to stay in the race. But it’s over!
Posted by: azlu sephnog | June 1, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Who cares that 90% of the African-American’s vote has carried the Democratic Party thus far. The only people that matters now is white america.
I am Hillary Clinton, I am white and I approve this rule change, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
can some one explain why Hilary can’t run as an independent ?
Posted by: dsinla | June 1, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Hillary, you have not won the ‘popular vote’. You are a LIAR.
Posted by: nope | June 1, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
BigMitch-
Hillary Clinton could not even unit her own party to win these primaries. This would seem to indicate she could not win in a general when the people who really dislike her come out to play.
She has run unopposed for months now, nothing negative about her anywhere. Of course her polling numbers are good. She is the only one not having mud thrown at her.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
…and adult obama supporter…considering I am almost 40… I take offense to that…
She is done…and her campaign is now hurting the issues.
Her husbands oponnents with what little money they had could have fought on…and would have definitively destroyed Bill’s chances…(everyone is not looking at the real numbers and dates and percentages from 92)
the Clinton’s know that…they don’t care. They know if Bob Kerrey had fought on through to the campaign Bill would not have won. They also know that the only reason he really won was because of Ross Perot.
They don’t “remember” that when other candidates talked about his scandals and derided his relationships is when his polls took a nose dive …. but they do.
If Bob Kerrey was a multi-millionaire he probably could have gone on and beat Clinton in the primary…loaning his campaign money.
What Clinton supporters are doing is not looking at history…and that the Clinton’s won in 92 because their fellow candidates didn’t do what Hillary has done.
That is an adult saying that…lots of candidates in history had close primaries…the ones who fought on lost it for the general.
Hillary has had a slim chance for a long time unless she could convince party insiders to overturn the will of the states…and therefore the people (because you have to count the states and the 1000′s who voted in the caucuses…otherwise you aren’t counting a popular vote).
As an adult I know this…if I wasn’t an adult I wouldn’t.
Look at history… the Clinton’s are doing what others with support of voters just like the Clinton supporters now… didn’t do to them…and gave the party a chance to win and issues to be fought for.
This has been about Hillary…not the issues.
Posted by: dl | June 1, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Any “democrat” who votes for McCain over Obama deserves what they ask for. Four more years of war in Iraq. Four more yeas of no national healthcare plan and a policy that would put all of the costs of healthcare on to individuals like you. No more employer provided healthcare under John McCain. Four more years of no energy policy. For more years of the same or more likely worse. If that is what you want vote for McCain. Go ahead and take our nation down with you because your candidate lost in a fair process. Obama might not be your first choice but he shares your values a lot more than John McCain or the Republicans.
Posted by: NoMcSame | June 1, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
I’m white, and I can do what I want, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Barack Obama will unite the party with the help of many people including Hillary. We will be ready and we will win come November.
Personal differences mean nothing in the face of the horrible direction we’ve been going and will continue to head into under John McCain.
Posted by: Bill | June 1, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Hillary Who, you are out of your mind, how would Obama win without the 18 million Hillary supporters? To call them thugs is
NOT the way to convince them to join the same club you are in.
Posted by: AGS345 | June 1, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
All you trolls who keep saying Democrats will lose because they are too liberal don’t seem to be paying attention to what Americans are saying: Obama or Clinton over McCain. It’s in the polls. Yelp away about “liberal” this and “liberal” all that you like but most Americans are voicing their desire for Democrats to control Congress and the White House. That’s not wishful thinking; it’s a fact that’s easily accessible to anybody who can read a newspaper.
Posted by: Me | June 1, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
It seems like the ones most obsessed with race are the congregation over at TUCC. They do a lot of mocking and hating of people that aren’t like them. BTW – Obama was a contributing member of that church for 20 years. His donations help to keep their message of hate alive.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
The trouble is with Hillary’s popular vote argument is that she leaves out those of us from 14 caucus states, because she doesn’t feel that caucuses should count. (That’s FOURTEEN states who have contributed according to their accepted formats to the primary process, but who ARE NOT included in the popular vote tally.) But the Clinton campaign does include a significant popular vote total from Puerto Rico, which is NOT counted in a general election.
I realize that this election is so close that a large number of voters will feel great disappoint if their candidate is not the nominee. But to ignore the delegate count, in favor of a popular vote claim, which is nearly impossible to verify, is courting legitimate outrage from disenfranchised caucus voters. We have an imperfect system that probably needs changing by 2012.
Super delegates are within their rights to use whatever standards they prefer, but if they choose to stick with the traditional (more clear cut) delegate math, rather than to tread into an very questionable measurement of the popular vote, they should not be condemned by the Clinton camp, as if they have over turned the will of the people. It may be difficult to impossible to determine the actual will of the people in this election cycle, and the super delegates are within their rights, however they vote, to bring this process to a close (as soon as possible, whatever that outcome might be) so that we as a party have a chance to come together and take on the Republicans.
And, what a travesty it would be for a Party that has had it’s two strongest nominees be a woman and a black man, to dare claim that gender or race prejudices resulted in an unhappy outcome for either side. There are people in this world who are prejudiced, but prejudice should not be blamed for the outcome of this election. The reason one candidate or the other will lose, is because both were outstanding and only one could win.
Posted by: Shannon S | June 1, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
The trouble is with Hillary’s popular vote argument is that she leaves out those of us from 14 caucus states, because she doesn’t feel that caucuses should count. (That’s FOURTEEN states who have contributed according to their accepted formats to the primary process, but who ARE NOT included in the popular vote tally.) But the Clinton campaign does include a significant popular vote total from Puerto Rico, which is NOT counted in a general election.
I realize that this election is so close that a large number of voters will feel great disappoint if their candidate is not the nominee. But to ignore the delegate count, in favor of a popular vote claim, which is nearly impossible to verify, is courting legitimate outrage from disenfranchised caucus voters. We have an imperfect system that probably needs changing by 2012.
Super delegates are within their rights to use whatever standards they prefer, but if they choose to stick with the traditional (more clear cut) delegate math, rather than to tread into an very questionable measurement of the popular vote, they should not be condemned by the Clinton camp, as if they have over turned the will of the people. It may be difficult to impossible to determine the actual will of the people in this election cycle, and the super delegates are within their rights, however they vote, to bring this process to a close (as soon as possible, whatever that outcome might be) so that we as a party have a chance to come together and take on the Republicans.
And, what a travesty it would be for a Party that has had it’s two strongest nominees be a woman and a black man, to dare claim that gender or race prejudices resulted in an unhappy outcome for either side. There are people in this world who are prejudiced, but prejudice should not be blamed for the outcome of this election. The reason one candidate or the other will lose, is because both were outstanding and only one could win.
Posted by: Shannon S | June 1, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
I don’t have to denounce or reject a goddarn thing. I’m white and I can do what I want, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
dsinla–
She cannot run as an independent because June 2nd is the deadline to petition to have your name on the ballot in most states as an independent candidate.
She is $20 mil in debt, how does she afford to run as an independent?
She will not because she would then be ostracized from the democratic party.
She will not because she would LOSE as an independent just as she has lost the primary.
The biggest delusion in all of this is that Hillary could actually win as an independent. She would get maybe 1-2% of the vote if she were lucky.
Point is moot because she isn’t running as an independent.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Hillary can’t run as an Independent because she already needs to qualify in states and is still on the Democratic ballot. She has lost 4 or 5 states as they have closed and you have to have signatures to qualify. She also doesn’t have the money. by running as an Independent she would split the vote with Obama and they would both lose to McCain. McCain is already having a problem with Bob Barr running.
Posted by: Independent | June 1, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
There’s a new number in town. I’m Hillary Clinton, and I approve this rule change, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Amen – Independant! I’m a wife of a union worker with 2 teens getting ready for college. We are definitely feeling the pinch with the economy and we support the troops. Our family packs and ships care packages to the soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The reason I’m for Obama and so interested in this election. He said from the first minute of his campaign the very same things we were saying in our rural midwest living room. He understood and connected with us immediately. He has organized a gigantic grassroots network of people like you and me – democrat, republican and independent. The big thing in this election is that whatever our party, we are all Americans and we all want more for each other and for our country.
All of us working together will bring change – it always has.
Hillary has no foreign policy experience other than diplomatic travels. She’s been in elected office for fewer years than Obama. And also, in the 8 years of the Clinton administration she was unable to coordinate with others for consensus on a nat’l healthcare plan. How would 4 more years help? We are voting for a president, not a dictator.
Posted by: Anne | June 1, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Hillary and Bill are destroying the party and I believe its thier goal, now.
They will go down in history to with Bush as being was bad in American politics of this era.
Posted by: Liberal Resurrgency | June 1, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
I’m white, I’m white – hahahahaha! Don’t you wish you were too? HaHaHaHaHaHa!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Adult Obama Supporter:
Very clear and rational post. I agree, the time for bickering within the party is past, we need to focus on the battle on the horizon. Divided, McCain wins, and America loses. United, we can improve America’s future. Not just for the wealthy few, but for the majority.
But don’t stop with the presidential race. There are National, State, and Local elections this fall also. Support the Democrat in each of these races too.
Posted by: Marie | June 1, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
IMAGE MATTERS,
“… If you Hillary supporters inflict terrorism on this country by helping elect McCain ….”
Are you saying whatever because you think you can post anonymously?
Posted by: magda | June 1, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
I cant wait when all America will get into election fever its still months away , All of Americans tend to wait till october to get into the groove , mind you alot more have jump in early, All that said Barack will have HUGE allies in the thousands it should be fun , And you can spot John MCbush rallies… AHEM!! I mean garthering at your local SHADY PINES RETIREMENT HOMES.
PRUNES and BINGO ANYONE!!!!!
Posted by: Lisa 28 | June 1, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
White Women for McCain. Give me a break!
Posted by: bernie | June 1, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
She and Bill also didn’t hesitate to count the caucuses when they ran in Bill’s favor.
[P.S. I also forgot to put the close quotation marks on my imagined quote above.]
~ Lizzy
Posted by: Elizabeth | June 1, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
No
Bush is a terrorist period! McCain is third Bush term, you do the math.
I say this in public all the time. I do NOT support Bush or his policies, never have.
This is still America and I am allowed to state my opinion of the foul creature who is our president.
Posted by: IMAGE MATTERS | June 1, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
I’m a part of a people who stole you. Didn’t you think I would steal the election, too? HaHaHaHaHaHa!
I’m white and I can do what I want, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Did you notice that he was blown out again today. The left wing and black vote are not enough for him to win in the GE. Do you need to hear it again…Not Enough. He’s already severed ties with the typical white Americans, so he’d better start learning Espanol very quickly.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
To all you democrats that will vote for McCain, thank you! I’m Just Glad Hillary will be GONE! If Obama happens to win I can live with it. Anybody But Clinton!
Posted by: Another Republican | June 1, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
The only vote that counts in America is the vote of hard working White Americans. I’m Hillary Clinton, I’m white and I approve this rule change, damit!
HaHaHaHaHaHa!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Untrustworthy Hillary and Bill. Thank goodness they have finally been thwarted in their hijack attempt of America. And thankfully, the immutable principle of reap and sow continues to operate. Go home, shysters!! Begone!
Posted by: Daveed | June 1, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
They’d better prepare a suicide hotline for all the Obama supporters, because they are going to need it the day after election. I hope we don’t have a Jonestown type of event on our hands. I lived through Gore and Kerry. So stay strong and the hurt will heal over time.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
She won in all the big states needed for the GE, Obama lost. She has the better chance, if only the DNC didn’t put road blocks in her way. If Obama goes the way of Kerry, McGovern and he will, Dem’s lose again. Thanks, Howard Dean…yet another loser.
Posted by: Sam | June 1, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
I will win this election, not make good on any promises, ruin the country, and you will still love me, just like you voted George Bush into office for a second term. We are white, damit!
HaHaHaHaHaHa!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
tiredtoo, set race relation back 50 years? since when did it ever move forward?
White people are so good at thinking things are going forward when they are not. Look at the response to Katrina.
Look at the lack of diversity in high levels of management at big companies. It is still highly white majority.
Race relations don’t move forward til people start talking about it, problem is you all are too cowardly to talk about race and acknowledge there is a problem.
Rest of the Hillary-ites who will vote for McCain, why are you so angry, and reacting out of angry? If a black person was angry, you’d call them angry black people and throw resentment and hatred on them, but your anger is justified? Please.
Obama and Hillary have the same democratic views. Your lack of ability to discern that is what is more troubling, that you don’t vote for the needs of the country, but for the needs of your emotions. Pathetic.
Grow up people.
Posted by: Soji | June 1, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Sam, what DNC road blocks are you talking about. And please don’t tell me it is Mi and Fl when Hillary approved that their votes wouldn’t count. So please explain what you mean by road blocks.
Posted by: lisa | June 1, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
I am constantly amazed at the sheer lack of intelligence some of Clinton’s supporters have! Do you people not read, listed to news, get your facts from anywhere else but cousin Bubba, Aunty May, or hillarymustbepresidenttosatisifyherego.com? I mean really, must so many of you try so hard to fit that demographic of being uneducated? Either way, to you Clinonites, we thank you. John faced some pretty stiff odds, but with all the anger you queen has stirred up, she has made it a whole lot easier for us to stay in Power. So, on behalf of John McCain and those of us that support him, we raise our glasses and toast Hillary Clinton. We knew all along that as long as she stayed in this that you democrats wouldn’t stand a chance!
Posted by: Laughing too hard | June 1, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
To me Hillary can’t be trusted at all as she signed the paperwork with her name on it for Michigan and Florida not to be counted and when she is in trouble she wants those two state to be counted to save her ass, how could people trust you to lead this country ????????
think about it.
Posted by: Flipflop | June 1, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Don’t ever underestimate me, because I am white. Watch your back, your purse, your job, your 401K, your pension, your health, your livelihood, your DNA – you better watch it all, because I am white and I will get you.
HaHaHaHaHaHa!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
How can Hillary supporters be so willing to rally with MactheSame? Answer = they were with him all along, as is Hillary who praised McSame more than she did anybody else. Her supporters have never been democrats anyway. So, good riddance. New alliances are forming and will win. See ya!
Posted by: Patriot | June 1, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
This woman does NOT represent me. I stand for integrity, honesty, transparency and morality and she has demonstrated none of these qualities. In fact, judging from her remarks and tactics, even today, she offers the opposite of these qualities. I am ashamed that such a high profile woman for this highest of office would present herself as she has. She will go down in history as the antithesis of all those good women who came before her in securing women’s right to vote. Shame on Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: truthinreporting | June 1, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Hillary knows she can’t win the Democratic Presidential nomination so she wants to take the party down with her. She wants the Democrats to lose the general election so she can run again in the next election rather than wait 8 more years. It’s all or nothing for Hillary.
Posted by: RQA | June 1, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
You will never get equal opportunity suckas, because I am white, and I will die before I let you get close to the nothing I got.
HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
I wonder if Hillary will still beloved in Puerto Rico when she stiffs them for thousands of dollars?
Posted by: Another Republican | June 1, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Dear Hillary Clinton: I worked on the Clinton/Gore Campaign in 1992. I was fooled into thinking that you folks were fighting the good fight and were honest people with character, integrity and honor. Boy was I wrong. It took a while but I stopped drinking the Clinton Kool Aid. During this campaign cycle you, Bill and your surrogates: Mark Penn, Howard Wolfson, Terry McAuliffe, Howard Ickes, Lanny Davis, Paul Begala et. al etc. have made clear that your kind of politics is repulsive to anyone with half a brain. You are a shape shifting political fraud, a faux feminist, a working class predator who has run a campaign targeting a mass deception on the lower classes all over America. You have engaged in race baiting politics to drive a wedge in the Democratic Primary and you push a fabricated rationale for your candidacy which focuses exclusively on the contests that you have won and gives no regard to the results in 34 races which you lost. Those who celebrate you are too foolish, ignorant or short several brain cells. Your $1,500 hair cuts with blonde hair dye, fake blue contacts, botox laden face, yellow pant suits are but your grand deception to look like the All American White Lady. Why not show Americans your dark brown hair, your hazel eyes and your weather beaten face from years of aggressive ambition tearing apart those who would dare expose the depth, extent and breadth or your fraud. WHO OWNS YOU HILLARY? WHO BOUGHT YOU? America needs a colonic to flush the Clinton fecal matter from the bowels of our democracy.
You are not my Senator. New York is not your home and you would be well advised to get in trailer and head back to Arkansas where you belong. You are not fit to represent the people of New York. Your campaign is an embarrassment to us.
Posted by: Christopher London | June 1, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Change your nose, change your hair, change your friends, change anything your heart desires, but you will never be white like me!
HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!
I rule the wooooorrrrrrlllllldddddd!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Can we all just agree that Obama can’t win in the GE? He sealed his fate 20 years after he wrote his first check to TUCC. His mentor took him for a ride and is now living in a huge mansion in a white neighborhood.
Posted by: Mack | June 1, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Thank you Paige…you summed it up correctly.
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Wah, Wah, Wah…
Go away Hillary, and take these whiney ass pseudo democrats with you. You are all too emotionally invested to think clearly.
The only reason Hillary is polling better vs. McCain is because her supporters are bitter and clinging to their dreams of another Clinton presidency. THEY DON’T DESERVE IT!! Do you honestly think she would be polling so well if she were to steal the nomination? Don’t you understand that the percentage of Obama supporters who would refuse to vote for her would skyrocket? Her negatives are already at a record high! The republicans have been praying for her to pull this out because she will unite them as only the Clintons can.
Think about it. She has run a shabby campaign, with ever-changing messages, and is millions of dollars in debt. She deserves credit for being such a spirited competitor, but the writing has been on the wall for sometime.
Posted by: Vision Quest | June 1, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
The Hillarious Math – COUNT EVERY VOTE INCLUDING: Democrats Abroad, Guam, Puerto Rico, American Samoa & Virgin Islands- and pretend every voter in Michigan wants her bad… MAYBE NOT EVERY VOTE… LEAVE OUT:
Alaska,Colorado,Hawaii,Idaho,Iowa,Kansas
Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada
North Dakota ,Texas(Caucus only) Washington & Wyoming… pretend not a single voter in MI. likes Obama.
It’s just soooo Clinton to soil the rugs and steal the furniture,leaving a foul odor as they’re being run out of town. BTW – Bill’s back & ready for a fresh Republican vetting… see the new Vanity Fair
Posted by: kelly scott | June 1, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Thank you Paige…you summed it up correctly. Here Here Chris London…I’ll never vote her again.
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
I can make all the mistakes I want, but Obama cannot make one mistake. I’m white and he’s not, damit!
When will you suckas get it?
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
JFK’s major speechwriter said Obama reminds him very much of that President; like it or not, Obama’s spiritedness and charisma actually enhances and outshadows his political side, and now more than ever in this media-age where diplomacy and charm are necessary to convince, this quality is essential for the appearance of America’s strength and superiority; the ability to lead, energize and inspire already looks better than being stubborn and old, like some people… Changing the atmosphere of people’s lives, even if it is at first (or perhaps even primarily) done by the power of enthralling is not a small thing; in practical terms Idealistic politics isn’t just about policies, it’s also about getting people in the mood to get along with each other, infusing the populace with some sense of their lives having dignity and meaning. Great motivators and orators are no small part of History, and we may have one of the latest and greatest here. His impact is more than technical; young people aren’t afraid to say “It’s his vibe, he’s cool, he gives me hope,” and this is not as naive as it sounds. It can get things done; people will want to join in cheerfully. I’m just glad he’s a Democrat and not a fascist.
Posted by: Curious | June 1, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
You can continue to write long and detailed blogs. But there is only one point in this campaign, actually in all of America…
I’m white and he’s not, damit!
Posted by: jack | June 1, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
I wonder if Hillary will still be beloved in Puerto Rico when she stiffs them for thousands of dollars?
Posted by: Another Republican | June 1, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
CLINTON’S victories are too little too late. It’s as if you lose a nine inning ball game and the other team is in the locker room, getting changed or gone home to sleep and you turn on the scoreboard and hit some home runs in the 10th inning. Obama is already turned his campaign to the General Election and Hillary is running up some margins in contests that truly don’t matter. Her victory in a territory that does not vote in the general election is like, “whatever, so you jumped in the back of a pick up truck, drank some cerveza and travel around the Puerto Rican countryside like a revolutionary.” Here is the problem bee-otch, the game is on the mainland and you got toasted here despite having all the money, the power and the party apparatus behind you. You were NOT READY ON DAY 1 OF THE CAMPAIGN so how can you be READY ON DAY 1 AS PRESIDENT? You were against the WAR after you authorized it. YOU ARE FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE after your approach sabotaged it for a generation. PLEASE HILLARY GO AWAY ALREADY.
Posted by: Christopher London | June 1, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
If Clinton managed to wrangle the nomination from Obama, just how would she win the general without the African-American vote? She couldn’t and wouldn’t because of the negative campaign she has run against Obama. And if she or her supporters cause him to lose the general election then she won’t have the African American vote in 2012 either, nor in her next Senate run. All you women threatening to vote for McCain need to remember that revenge flows both ways and you could really ruin her in the party and her political career. Hillary will play a large role in an Obama administration, but in McCain’s administration she and Bill would be less than nothing.
Posted by: Debra | June 1, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
All I will say, is she agreed the votes in FLA and MICH wouldn’t count, and now they do. Anyone that would lie to me and themselves about agreements they made wouldn’t think twice about lying about other matters.Shame on the DNC for counting any votes for those states.
Posted by: kim | June 1, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
Vision Quest-that’s exactly right, every voter DOESN’T count in Hillary world, and no, she has not received the most votes ever in the universe-but Obama has. It’s not even debatable, it’s not a matter of opinion.
I’m not sure what we should do with the Hil supporters, I think that most of them on the blogs are either repubs in a pantsuit or the radical whackadoodles, and I hope Hil has a plan on how to take them out of the trance…but she keeps the trance going and going…I am sadly starting to believe that Hillary is not only a bad candidate and a bad campaigner (imagine if she didn’t have the machine on her side!), but that she is actually willing to destroy the party…I never thought she would be this despicable. I was never a Hillary hater. She is like a scorpion in a corner, stinging herself and anything she can.
Posted by: Gina | June 1, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Hillary should do one more SNL bit!
This one will have her being dragged
off the stage and grabbing onto desks,
chairs and drapes in an effort to prevent her removal!
Sounds a lot like her refusal to
concede the nomination to Obama and leave the political stage graciously!
Posted by: reaganfan | June 1, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Small minds only make racial slurs to prove a point, but I can guarantee if I was standing right in front of you, you wouldn’t say a word. I am on my last nerve with this racial crap. I, like many blacks we marched and died for our right to vote and we exercise that vote no matter what the candidate looks like. It was the black community who put Bill in office and was overwhelmingly for Clinton, before she took it upon her self to insult my people and my commnunity. To have the media reduce our vote to a racial one, when contrary to popular belief we vote on the issues. I find it ironic that now most of you want to vote when you probably never took the time. If it’s your first time and your over 18, that’s why your ignorant behind is in the position your in, because your dumb butt let someone do the thinking for you. This country has left you behind and you will stay behind. Stick to what you know, in-bredding,trailer parks, no teeth, and white sheets.
DEAL WITH IT!
Posted by: BrainvsBrawn | June 2, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
You know, I think it’s rather hilarious that a bunch of people will willfully and gladly cast their vote to someone who is utterly incapable of convincing the American people that he understands the current state of the world.
Someone who, despite being known for his efforts to create a consensus between Democrats and Republicans, readily adopts the neo-conservative party line once he needs their support.
Does that sound like someone who you would like to have running this country? He can’t even USE THE INTERNET OR CHECK EMAIL! How is he supposed to have his finger on the pulse of the people, IF he can’t even post a comment on this website!
It just goes to show that most Americans are in fact, just as sadly blind to rationale and reason.
Vote with your emotions.
Let critical thought and reasoning hide behind your blind rage.
Posted by: Partisan Politics | June 2, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Compromise is the American way. Accept the results and quit whining. Obama will be a 1000% better than 4 more years of war, a lousy economy, and Bush policies.
Posted by: mick | June 2, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Let’s face it, Hilary’s supporters desire for someone with a vagina to be in the white house is stronger than their sense of reason and fair play.
How else do you explain wanting the keep the votes in Michigan?
Posted by: Nancy Given | June 2, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Ladies and gentelmen, Hillary has just left the building.
Goodbye and Allista Bye Bye.
Posted by: Xrayvusuion | June 2, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
For all you imbeciles who can’t see the forest for the trees. For those of you who want to TRULY disenfranchise voters in caucus states, and so-called red states. For those of you who discredit HOPE and embrace DYNASTY. For those of you who say you’ll betray your party, who call Obama a “looser” (sic) and a variety of racist bullshit, I ask you to do one thing for me.
Look in the mirror. Say the things you think about Obama. Make the faces you make as you type your hateful, racist, antidemocratic, anti-Democratic venom and answer me this one question:
Do you look bitter?
Yeah, he was – in the end – right about that too.
Posted by: John, from Las Vegas, NV | June 2, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
To anyone of the Hillary supporters here who is claiming that they will vote for McCain (to those who really mean it). No matter what anyone else says, or whatever you say, we both know that if you are actually in your heart of hearts considering voting for McCain, then you are doing it out of spite for Hillary not winning the nomination. And honestly you are being really selfish because no matter what hurt feelings you have plunging the country into another 4 years of this is not something we will walk away from. I am an American living in China and I have watched the US gradually collapse from a distance for the last 8 years. THIS IS NOT HYPERBOLE-THE COUNTRY IS GOING DOWN. There are so many serious problems in the US right now: the economy, social security, wars, medical services, ect… If this isn’t changed right away then it is going to go beyond critical mass. China is rising-and there simply aren’t enough resources for the US to maintain a high standard of living for very long unless things are changed NOW. If you really do vote for mccain I think that it will be too late 4 years from now. Its already 2 minutes to midnight. Do you not want to have readily accessible food/travel/services? Do you want a weak military when China starts throwing its weight around after the olympics? Put your feelings aside and save the world by just voting democrat. Really!
Posted by: Ryan | June 2, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Hey AG
I’ll give you 365 reasons. http://www.365hillary.com
Change is coming. America, you should be smiling. :)
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Let me get this straight. Sen. Clinton says, “The decision will fall on the shoulders of those leaders in our party, empowered by the rules, to vote at the Democratic convention.”
So she lifts up “the rules” to encourage the superdelegates to choose her, yet she decries “the rules” of the party re: the Michigan and Florida votes?
Does anyone else see this as hypocritical?
Posted by: Kevin | June 2, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Hussein Obama will never be president of the USA. He is not electable.
Posted by: Moe | June 2, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
The myth is that Hillary will care about his SD comitments. She’s going to play this out to August — everything out of her campaign says that they won’t count the votes of the SDs into the totals until the convention.
Hillary wants to lose her Senate position. She’s doing a great job so far. Too bad she won’t be in any elected office by the end of this crap.
Posted by: Me | June 2, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Hillary didn’t earn her delegates, she cheated. She gave her word (which is worthless,) and pledged not to campaign in those states. SHe didn’t give a rats “A-sockey-sockey” for those states until she realized she was losing, then she stirred up this mess.
THE MI and FL DNCs created this mess, by dishonoring their pledge to hold their primaries after March 1, then they wanted to holler about losing seats.
Obama and Edwards did the honorable thing. They complied with the DNC and did not campaign in those states. Why should Obama be penalized for obeying the rules?
Clinton believes she is above the law. They have gotten away with murder for years. Now is the time for the nation, and the voters to send the Clintons back to New York, or Arkansas, or Penssylvania, or whatever state they are claiming as their home this week!
Posted by: preatorius | June 2, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
An American in Canada for David can’t read! Now I know why he’s for Clinton!
We told you why Obama got some Michigan votes. Put the shoes on the other feet and if Obama was running around whining and changing rules to suit his own unbridled ambitions like HRC is doing. wouldn’t you Hillary supporters be crying foul? Of course, you would. It’s just sour grapes to say you will vote for McCain and the dems will lose. That’s up to you. Do you want change or the same-ol, same-old politics as usual?
Obama for change! Forget race, forget gender, think only of character and Obama outshines HRC in every respect. Now get rid of our prejudices and get behind Obama and the democratic party and let’s change America into what it should be. Your responsiblity is to do what you can to get him elected and take the election from Bush’s clone, McCain.
Gobama!!!! Smile America! Change is truly on the way at last! :)
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
OK, time for one of the more politically mature Obama supporters to address the Clinton supporters on here.
First off, ignore most of the obnoxious postings by many of my fellow Obama supporters who are just taunting and saying some pretty ridiculous things in a childish fashion. I have seen many like these in the Obama volunteer situations I have been in and just realize many of them are young and are engaging in the political process for the first time, so they’re, let’s just say, overly excited. They do not represent the overwhelming majority of Obama supporters who are pretty much just like you. Many of us are like you and have voted in more than a couple of campaigns . And I was just as troubled by what Rev. Wright said as many of you were. I offer no excuses for Obama there.
Ignore many of their postings which can’t be taken seriously. Calling Clinton “finished” or “toast” is just silly. Obama will win one of the closest primaries in political history. Tens of millions Democrats voted and a these two guys are separated by a few hundred thousand votes. There are over 4000 delegates and they are separated by a little more than 100. There is no question Hillary has been doing better than Obama since March, whereas he was doing better before. It’s really pretty even and this talk of Hillary being finished like she lost by a landslide is fanciful. Ignore it.
The majority of us Obama supporters think the world of Hillary and although we too occasionally got caught up in the competition in the end we are able to realize she is a valuable ally in the Democrat party, as is Bill. They are not ogres or criminals or fascists or whatever the lates insult is. Bill Clinton is still one of my favorite Democratic leaders and has done much for the party.
So trust me — we welcome you into a united Democratic campaign in November. You will be welcomed by us and for those few Obama supporters who haunt blogs and write before they think, just ignore them like we in the Obama campaign have been doing for a while.
We need you to win in November — you are 50% of the primary campaign voters and the loss of even 10% of you would be harmful. I understand the ridiculous taunts on here are counter-productive because I, like many of you, understand the world of politics.
Come join us and help us because we need you and your ideas and your maturity.
Thanks
Posted by: Adult Obama Supoorter | June 2, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Oh my freaking god.
There IS no popular vote, woman. What are you, insane?
The primaries were never ABOUT popular vote. If they were, states wouldn’t be allowed to have caucuses. Caucuses don’t have an official vote count. No one has been keeping track of popular vote because THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS DELEGATE COUNT.
What is she smoking? Seriously, can someone tell me what’s wrong with her? I am seriously floored. How can you be leading in the popular vote, when no one actually knows what the popular vote IS? Is this her “best estimate” popular vote? It HAS to be.
And how many people voted for Obama in MI? If we’re talking about the voter’s WILL, I know of a bunch of people who voted uncommitted but wanted to vote for Obama. Do THEY count? What about the 30K write-in votes for Obama?
What… is she smoking?
Can someone please explain to me how the popular vote is figured out, without a proper caucus count, and involving two states, one in which Obama didn’t campaign, and the other in which he wasn’t on the ballot?
Posted by: paganmist | June 2, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Hey Jack,
No matter how much you pump and rub on gels and creams it will always be small.
Jack has penis envy!
LOL
Posted by: preatorius | June 2, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
John, from Las Vegas, NV | Jun 2, 2008 12:06:59 AM
Forgive, me, allow me to clean up your post a little, in the hopes that will prevent it from being deleted.
Otherwise, my sentiments exactly.
====================================
For all you [naifs] who can’t see the forest for the trees. For those of you who want to TRULY disenfranchise voters in caucus states, and so-called red states. For those of you who discredit HOPE and embrace DYNASTY. For those of you who say you’ll betray your party, who call Obama a “looser” (sic) and a variety of racist [vitriol], I ask you to do one thing for me.
Look in the mirror. Say the things you think about Obama. Make the faces you make as you type your hateful, racist, antidemocratic, anti-Democratic venom and answer me this one question:
Do you look bitter?
Yeah, he was – in the end – right about that too.
Posted by: λόγος | June 2, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
This is very simple. She signed a pledge to not campaign or be placed on the Michigan ballot and broke her promise, yet demands she be awarded all the delegates. When this happened in 1992, she pushed to have entire states disenfranchised because they moved their primaries, yet now she claims to be their champion? And those pesky caucuses? Don’t count, she says. Perhaps more importantly, if you all do take that swan dive into the McCain pool out of some childish wish for revenge, he will appoint a reactionary judge to the Supreme Court and you can see all of your precious, hard – fought civil rights fly away for good. You will only have yourselves to blame. As a delegate to the California convention last year, I saw him up close; he is clearly the best candidate I have ever seen in my life and he will win hands down in November, no matter what you pathetic trolls say.
Posted by: John Strubbe | June 2, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Hey Mack,
Present a candidate wo have more expereince than sleep with the president, and dodging invisible bullets and I will vote for her or him!
For the record. Obama 10 years in elected office.
Clinton only as 8 years. The rest was just pilow talk, or maybe under the desk exchanges, knowing bill.
Posted by: preatorius | June 2, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Let’s see;
McCain nearly 100% voting record against womans right to choose and will put judges on the court that will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Stay the course in Iraq and maybe even bomb Iran for good measure.
No, repeat No desire or plan to change health care, about as far from universal health care as one can get.
Make permanent the Bush tax cuts.
I could go on
People have turned this whole thing into a sporting event not an incredibly important elections with ramifications long into the future. Hillary supporters I am sorry your candidate lost, so did mine (a long while ago, though). It is time to accept this and move on. The idea that you would vote for McCain when he is opposite on nearly every issue that Senator Clinton stands for, while her issues are the same issue of concern to Senator Obama shows a level of vindictiveness which is reprehensible. Winning has become so important that we have forgotten why it is we want to win in the first place
Posted by: This is real | June 2, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Obama has won twice as many states as Hillary.
She has been in decline since January!
No money, no support, even her colleagues are asking her to quit.
Posted by: preatorius | June 2, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Her concept/story/idea only includes primaries, it does not include the caucases.
So Hillary, so much for including everyone. You are clearly not including everyone, so stop stretching the story.
Posted by: Rodney | June 2, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
truly delusional. she has lost her grip on reality, in a serious manner. this is straight up scary.
Posted by: ben | June 2, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 It’s over chubs Hillray has finally stealthley seeked her chicken sht operation to melt out.
Go away!
Posted by: Xrayvusuion | June 2, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
Hillary clearly does not speak for ALL Americans. Certainly not this 61 year old white woman who has seen enough of her lies in the eight years she was around trying to hide them all. Just look at the gaffes she has made all along. She’s told so many lies (sniper fire?), etc. that she can’t even keep them all straight. In that way she mimics McCain.
Posted by: For Mr. Obama | June 2, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
I can understand the Clinton supporters being disappointed that their candidate isn’t going to win but under no circumstances would I consider voting for McCain in the general election. Not only would it be a continuation of the Bush administration but it would set our country back decades with what would happen with the Supreme Court alone. Go Democrats!
Posted by: skertso | June 2, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Some people here are republicans pretending to be dems, and are fanning the frustration of Hillary supporters to lure them to vote McCain.
Real Hillary supporters are real democrats and smart enough to know the risk of a 3d Bush term–with no garanty that in 2012 people who didn’t vote for Hillary this year will be willing to vote for her after she helped elect McSame
Posted by: Ro | June 2, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
The longer Hillary stays in the more bitter this fight is going to become. Hillary supporters just have to realize that Hillary’s chances are less than 1% or lower and cannot be overcome. It is time to let go and get behind Obama. If this hostility continues you will guarantee that McCain wins the election. If you allow that to happen you are not true democrats.
Posted by: Norman | June 2, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
you people and your “popular vote”…do you not understand the process? there is NO popular vote, just like the presidential vote, it’s not a popularity vote! period…you can’t have a popular vote determine this when some states allow voters to switch parties just for the primary and some states that won’t allow independents to vote…florida for one…and so on and so on…get a frickin mind of your own and stop with the Fox News Ditto Heads talking points.
Posted by: david | June 2, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
“So I’m in it for the long run; it’s not a very long run, it will be over by February fifth”
Hillary Clinton-
Posted by: Kane | June 2, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
“As a Canadian, I envy you Americans for your politics. What a fascinating race and what incredible candidates! I am not sure who I would vote for if I could vote, but you must admit that Ms. Clinton has shown incredible tenacity and energy. In a coin toss between two very competitive, equally capable, candidates, I think Hillary Clinton’s efforts in the last week might tip the scales in her favour. I would want a President whom I could count on never to give up, no matter what.”
REPLY: We already have one of those. His name is Geoge Bush.
Posted by: RJ Kruger | June 2, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
If we can show Hillary her math is faulty and a Harvard professor confirms her math is faulty she will drop the popular vote in a heartbeat, and start talking about electability and electoral college.
so much for concern about the people.
Puerto Rico no longer counts toward her electability or electoral college argument.
And that is exactly why Clinton has lost to Obama.
She will say and do anything to win, he will admit his mistakes and stand for what is right.
Posted by: stevenf | June 2, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
I admire Hillary, for her courage and resiliance. So sad, she will not get what she deserves. Obama is a man not only lacks experience and qualification, but also a man without a spine. Under pressure, he changed his talk-without-precondition stance, he resigned from his church, and now he only starts his training by going to Iraq. I was once angry that Obama used all the tactics to win. now I more detest this guy, and feel stronger everyday that I didn’t make wrong decision when I voted for Hillary. When Novebmer comes, I will not cast a vote.
Posted by: Amy | June 2, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Hillary is trying everything she can to win. Her drive is admirable. But she cannot win. Ignoring some caucuses and including Michigan, where Obama’s name wasn’t even on the ballot, does not a real popular lead make, in a real democracy. This is not Cuba where Castro is the only name on the ballot…
What we have to concentrate on now is how to move forward. Clinton and Obama agree on the majority of political issues and troubles facing the country. I urge us to unite behind the party to ensure we win this election. For those who say, “Don’t vote,” or “vote McCain,” out of spite or frustration, I say we cannot afford four more years of a downward spiral.
Some seem to like McCain’s “straight talk” personality. But you are not just voting for a personality. You are voting on issues of life or death in Iraq, and on the economy, and more. Please consider this, and support the Democratic candidate, who in all likelihood will be Barak Obama.
Whichever candidate wins the November election will have so many challenges to handle, they will need our support. The Dems are not a miracle cure for all ills, but at least they will try to move the country in a forward direction, and not flush it down the toilet, the way the Republicans have been doing, and the way McCain would continue to do. For the sake of your children, for the sake of our future, please vote for the Democratic candidate.
Join together now. Please. It is too important to throw away an election on in-fighting.
Posted by: mack | June 2, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
Amy what exactly does Hillary deserve, her entitlement to the nomination.
Posted by: d | June 2, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Wake up Montana and SD….don’t vote for this Obama, after all we know about his lack of judgement. How could anyone in their right mind not think the GOP will not ream BHO in Nov.?
These state will be Republican in the general, I believe, and if I was a Republican who could vote BHO Tuesday, I would, so McCain can trounce him. But if you are in any way a legit Dem, you gotta put your faith behind Hillary.
His 11 win streak was all BEFORE we knew his foul associations/belief in Black Liberation Theology. Christian, no, Muslim – maybe, Atheist – could be. Why couldn’t he just attend a regular Baptist church preaching brotherly love? Trinity/Rev. Wright will be his undoing, followed by lack of experience….exit polls will show millions of Hillary supporters backed McCain in Nov.
Posted by: Debra | June 2, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
She is NOT electable because she has TOO MUCH baggage. Particularly with pending lawsuits against her for major campaign fraud, she has major credibility issues. There is NO way with this litigation dangling out there that she will be electable come November. Heck, she can NOT even manage the funds within her current campaign. It is broke and owes lots of money to hard-working vendors who still have NOT been paid.
Posted by: Henry | June 2, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
If Clinton is counting MI and FL toward her popular vote count, then Obama should have received the memo that the rules changed.
Second, if she wants to count those states, then Obama should count the people who came out to caucus.
It is time to unite for Nov. and start discussing the REAL issues with McCain…health care, the war in Iraq, the economy and tax code fairness.
Posted by: Sarah | June 2, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Bash Hillary till you’re blue in the face, although that won’t help Obama win in the GE. Well, actually nothing will. He was done 20 years ago.
Posted by: Mack | June 2, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Amy…you can’t sit it out. You must vote, as a no vote allows Obama an inch closer to the WH.
Posted by: Debra | June 2, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Debra, recommend that you do your homework. The GOP has a bagload of “baggage” that they hope to unload on HRC. She will NOT win because they will tie it to the 90′s and the litigation issues of the Clintons and remind people of all the crap back then. Don’t believe it? Read for yourself.
http://www.paulvclinton.com
She is very crooked and corrupt. This stuff is scary in terms of the lengths her camp has gone thru to hide this. So I beg to differ with you, Debra. She is NOT our answer!
Posted by: Henry | June 2, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
It becomes very clear ,after invectives of ‘commie’, or leftist wacko’ are hurled that many of these posters are not Democrats. Therefore their sentiments can be ignored ,’cause they’re voting McCain, anyway. For those TRUE Clintonistas, let me assure you that HRC will NEVER be President. If by some unimaginably Machiavellian turn she ‘wins’ the nomination, her blatant pandering, hypocritical scorning of the very rules that she agreed to, and her cynical narcissism ensures that she will be the easiest candidate for the GOPers in November. Too then, since she CLEARLY wants to damage the Dems – so that she is the ‘last man’ standing for 2012 – the entire apparatus of this party will shun her , as the egomaniacal head case that she is. BTW : I’ll vote for her, too! See,.. that’s what intelligent people do .They vote their interests( think 2,or3 SCOTUS appments), and the issues. They leave their bruised egos aside. Peace, y’all!
Posted by: jimbobuddy | June 2, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
“For the sake of your children, for the sake of our future, please vote for the Democratic candidate.”
He wasn’t worried about the children when he brought them to his church of hate. A new generation of Black liberation theologists. And the circle of hate continues ad infinitum.
Posted by: Mack | June 2, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Watching these primaries and the current in-fighting, I understand how the Republicans won in 2000 and 2004 and how the extreme Right has hijakced this country for nearly a decade. My fellow AMERICANS, remember United We Stand…not just as democracts, but as Americans. None of the candidates if perfect! BUT vote for who you think is the best of the avaiable choices. I support Hillary because of her positions, not because she is a woman, not because of the happy Clinton years. BUT she lost the nomination battle even though she had many advantages going in. Obama has earned the nomination. And because his similarities with Hillary are greater than his differences, I will vote for him. I hope he surrounds himself with great advisors and listens to them, and to the american people!
Posted by: Galen | June 2, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Norman….the bitterness will not go away. The party is split. Hillary could plead or pay most of us….we would’t pull the lever for Obama in Nov. How does McCain Democrats sound?
Pretty good.
Thank god, Obama is too arrogant to offer VP to Hillary…if she took would still have to vote McCain.
Posted by: Debra | June 2, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Swinging from the far right to the far left isn’t the answer. Most Americans are closer to the center. It’s what worked for Clinton, stupid.
Posted by: Mack | June 2, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Christopher London, you said it so well!
Posted by: For Mr. Obama | June 2, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
PUERTO RICO NOTHING DIFFERENT WITH ILLEGAL alien , NP PAY TAX FEDERAL TAX but got 100 % WELFARE ,Bill let that happen.
In January 1998, right after The Washington Post revealed President Bill Clinton’s relationship with Monica, I spoke with him about his predicament. Shell-shocked and stunned at the calls for his impeachment, he knew he was facing the fight of his life. At first, he was vintage Bill Clinton: maudlin, sad and full of self-pity. But as we talked, he gradually changed his tone. Admitting that he was not innocent, but recognizing his diminishing support, he then told me defiantly: “Well, we’ll just have to win.”
Several years later, I was surprised to read in Sidney Blumenthal’s memoirs that then-first lady Hillary Clinton had used the exact same words on the exact same day in a conversation with the White House aide. “We’ll just have to win.”
That’s how the Clintons think — no matter what, they have to win. Winning is everything, and how you do it is not determined by any inner sense of values or ethics, but by a resolve to do whatever needs to be done, no more and certainly no less. So, on that day in January 1998 — because they had to win — their campaign to discredit a 23-year-old intern began in the White House. Private investigators dug up her old boyfriends. White House operatives spread the word that it was the president who was the victim. The young woman was an unbalanced stalker.
As impeachment unfolded, the extramarital affairs of key members of the Republican leadership in the House were suddenly outed.
Hillary Clinton began the disinformation campaign. Appearing on “The Today Show,” she righteously claimed that there was nothing to support Lewinsky’s claims and insisted that Bill was just “ministering” to a “troubled young woman.” Then came the blue dress and the Clintons finally — and reluctantly — changed gears.
But they never changed philosophies. Winning is still everything. No matter who gets destroyed, offended or hurt in the process.
We’ve seen it throughout Hillary’s campaign: the race-baiting by Bill Clinton in South Carolina and by Hillary in Kentucky. His comparison of Obama to Jesse Jackson and her talk about “hard-working whites” was not accidental. The Clintons don’t make verbal mistakes.
Everything they say is deliberate. And then Bill Clinton actually had the nerve to say that it was the Obama campaign and not him — that they had played the race card. Once again, he’s the victim.
Now Bill and Hillary are desperate to keep Hillary in the race. Despite mathematical impossibility, the Clintons are biding their time. Out of money and out of delegates, they are waiting for some unknown force to suddenly emerge and change the race. That’s why Hillary made the reference to Bobby Kennedy.
Because the Clintons know, better than most people, that time has often been a friend.
Anything can happen. Remember how, in 2001, they left the White House as pariahs amid the uproar about the last-minute pardons involving brothers of both of them, the hundreds of thousands of dollars in gifts of china, silver and furniture that they arranged to get from donors, and the theft of White House furniture. They were in disgrace. Hillary’s first press conference was a defense of her brothers’ payments for pardons. Both Clintons were lambasted by The New York Times, The Washington Post and every other media outlet. And, in Bill’s last hours in office, he pleaded guilty to crime and was disbarred.
But seven years later, Hillary has come amazingly close to becoming the Democratic Party nominee. And until he destroyed his reputation by his bizarre and belligerent behavior in Hillary’s campaign, Bill Clinton was the most popular guy in the world.
Time allowed Bill and Hillary to remake themselves — he as a save-the-world philanthropist and she as a hard-working senator who got along with everyone.
Just like time had turned the special counsel’s draft indictment of Hillary into scrap paper, particularly after Jim McDougal, the chief witness, died in prison.
And time erased the memory of the Clintons’ pardon of the FALN terrorist group to help Hillary with the Puerto Rican community.
But now time is finally running out for the Clintons. They’ve stayed at the party too long, and it isn’t a pretty sight. But they won’t leave gracefully. No way. They still believe that there’s a chance to win. And they’ll do anything to make that happen.
Because they just have to win.
Posted by: ls | June 2, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Hillary is unelectable and could never win a general whether Obama was in this race ot not.
There are so many 527s waiting in the wings to take her out, forget about it. Murdoch has one lined up with every woman who Bill has ever bedded.
The problem with Hillary’s supporters are that they are not very versed in politics or the political landscape, at all.
They have no idea what they are talking about or why they are even voting for her. They are doing it becuase of their emotions, nothing more, nothing less. They feel they have been wronged by the world, by men, etc.
Well guess what ladies, knee jerk emotions lose elections every time.
Wise up, your candidate has been flawed since Day one.
And since when does the Democratic Party run a Pro-War/Pro go to war with Iraq candidate?
Please, someone tell Hillary and her supporters that this is The Left Wing, not the Right Wing.
Posted by: Rodney | June 2, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
These people who say they will vote McCain if HRC loses the nomination are like little children, (Debra), who will take the ball and leave the playground. How ridiculous! “Oh, I can’t have HRC, so I’ll vote for the war mongering Republican”? That’s really brilliant thinking! NOT!
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
I wish she stay in PR as Governor & never come back.
Posted by: ROY | June 2, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Mack, we’re all entitled to our opinions and whomever we choose to vote for, so be it; however, would appreciate your refraining from calling anyone stupid. NOT necessary. I’m highly educated via formal education, but also on life. Open your mind that people have different opinions. I’m merely a true democrat, but concerned about her electability because of these major litigation issues that the GOP will eat her alive in during the general election. Talking major litigation on issues that have occurred since she left the WH.
Posted by: Henry | June 2, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
FIGURES DON’T LIE BUT LIARS CAN FIGURE!
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
The choosing of a Democrat nominee can’t possibly be expected to be “democratic” in the Clintons’ lawyers’ infantile sense–if it was, it wouldn’t be just Senators who could participate! Heck, let’s just give children the vote, too. We ALWAYS get to choose only between “undemocratically” pre-selected candidates, for crying out loud. Otherwise everybody would vote for whoever–the American they personally admire the most, you know? “My Barber for President!” or whatever.
Posted by: Curious | June 2, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
I wish she stay in PR as Governor & never come back.
Posted by: ROY | Jun 2, 2008 1:25:58 AM
___________________
We wish.
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Henry…the adjective “scarey” is one that millions of Americans attach to Obama.
McCain and Hillary are friendly and respectful and that is why they are uniting Americans…..NEVER OBAMA NEAR THE WHITE HOUSE!
Posted by: Debra | June 2, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
I find it thoroughly disgusting to read contributors suggesting that Democrats should EVER vote for a Republican Presidential nominee. It that is true, then for goodness sake, just drop the false pretense and join the Republican Party, where you clearly belong!
Posted by: LM from NE | June 2, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Reason…I am a Republican who voted/supported/contributed to HRC. I still feel she is the best candidate. I am an American first, party loyalist second. Millions of us out there for this election. Some of us just really want to trust the guys we give the keys over to on Pennsylvaina Ave. A deserving true American with judgement enough to never belong to a Black Liberation Theology church for 20 years.
Posted by: Debra | June 2, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Mack, okay, thanks for clarifying.
Debra, okay, whatever. The extent that HRC will go to, to win, at whatever costs, with ALL of her current baggage attached to her, now that is scary. Believe in fighting hard, but after doing my research on her, there is a common theme which continues to emerge. She has NO credibility nor ethics. Ongoing efforts to bypass the Constitution and law should not be tolerated of a President.
There are also millions of Americans that do NOT consider BO scarey. Too many people tied to the Clintons have left our great land under mysterious circumstances. Again, scarey!
Posted by: Henry | June 2, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Yes, Hillary wins the popular vote if you give Obama no votes in Michigan and don’t include ANYBODY who voted in a caucus..
Just change the rules until she wins. It’s only fair!
Posted by: Fred | June 2, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
And what do you call blind loyalty to a party that nominates a candidate that does represent your views. Insanity?
Posted by: Mack | June 2, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Getting tired, should have said “And what do you call blind loyalty to a party that nominates a candidate that does not represent your views. Insanity?
Posted by: Mack | June 2, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
What I have a problem with is Clinton’s foreign policy experience. The facts are, she made a corkscrew landing in Bosnia, while dodging sniper fire all the while. Upon landing she was able to make it to the hangar without being shot. What bothers me most was the fact that her backup team consisted of her then twelve-year-old daughter, a guitar player and a comedian. Why would she subject herself to harm and not even bring alone a sax player.
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
If it was safe in Bosnia, why were the soldiers in combat gear?
Posted by: Mack | Jun 2, 2008 1:48:07 AM
————————
If it was dangerous, why did she take the time to receive a poem from a nine-year-old girl on the tarmac, then leisurely greet soldiers on her way to her transportation. Why did she admit that she “mispoke?”
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am
I AM, If you did your research you would realize NO ONE stole delegates from anyone. Just because someone from the Clinton camp says something does not mean it is true – everyone should have learned that by now. The facts show 30,000 write-ins were discarded (for Obama). The Clinton camp said that wanted all votes to count – so they were. Too bad Clinton only meant if they were for her!
In addition, her claim to the popular vote lead is an outright LIE intended to deceive HONEST, HARDWORKING VOTERS! That gets me very angry – that she would take advantage of voter’s ignorance by lying!
DailyKos did two in-depth analyses of the popular vote including a metric for the caucus state votes…and, hands down, Obama leads in the popular vote as well as delegates!
From DailyKOS
My Math Beats Up Clinton Math.
by RenaRF
Sun Jun 01, 2008 at 06:34:27 PM PDT
(Promoted from the diaries by kos)
I’m sorry. I simply can’t take some of what I’m hearing on cable news as they cover the Clinton win in Puerto Rico and continue to repeat Clinton campaign talking points in her “rationale” to secure the Democratic Presidential nomination.
In the past three or four hours I have heard Harold Ickes, Terry McAuliffe, and Bill Schneider (CNN political analyst) repeatedly assert that Clinton is winning the popular vote. I have further heard each refer to the 1972 Democratic nominating process, where Humphrey won the popular vote yet McGovern won the delegates, and McGovern was resoundingly shellacked by Nixon (what that has to do with anything, I don’t know, but they’re saying it). Yet there was only one caution, from Anderson Cooper, that Clinton’s popular vote “lead” over Obama comes with substantial caveats on the part of the Clinton campaign. So I’ve done my own math.
Up-Front Disclosures
First, it’s important that I clearly spell out what I am and am NOT counting in the math I’ve done. I’ve based my calculations on two basic arguments the Clinton campaign is making:
1. That she is more electable in November;
2. That the popular vote she claims to lead is indicative of electability.
So here is what I have excluded from MY math:
Democrats Abroad
Guam
Puerto Rico
American Samoa
Virgin Islands
None of these groups/Commonwealths/territories are afforded electors in a general Presidential election. So going with Clinton argument #1 above, they are excluded as electors are not assigned.
The Clinton Math
Here’s what the Clinton camp is basing their assertion on. With the exception of PR, all vote totals were taken from CNN’s Election Center. Use the drop-down box to scroll through each state’s primary to confirm totals.
NOTE: The Puerto Rico estimate is precisely that right now – an estimate. I heard on both CNN and MSNBC that the highest estimated level of turnout was 435,000. I’ve been VERY generous in this assessment and have given Clinton a 70%-30% victory. This is what the vote totals in PR are based on.
CNN reported as well that Clinton is waiting, after the PR vote totals are finalized, to release two new ads touting having gone over 17,000,000 total votes. Her surrogates will continue to push the “Clinton Math”, which is now clearly outlined above.
Just for giggles, here’s what is excluded from the Clinton Math:
Alaska
Colorado
Hawaii
Idaho
Iowa
Kansas
Maine
Minnesota
Nebraska
Nevada
North Dakota
Texas (Caucus only)
Washington
Wyoming
ANY popular votes for Obama in Michigan
MY Math
Again – my math is based on the two core assertions of the Clinton campaign (electability and popular vote lead). First the primary states:
You’ll note that I gave “Uncommitted’s” popular vote back to Obama because it’s ludicrous to assume that NO ONE showed up to vote for Obama (eye roll). Yesterday’s ruling regarding Michigan in the Democratic Rules and Bylaws Committee backs me up on this.
Under MY primary math, Obama is still slightly behind Clinton in popular votes. But remember – there are FOURTEEN states that held caucuses which are NOT included in any of the math so far. So I went out and did some estimating. Democratic caucus turnout estimates for Alaska, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, and Wyoming were found here. I had to stretch on estimates for the remaining three caucus states. I used this mention for Hawaii’s turnout estimate, this mention for Texas’ caucus turnout, and this mention for Washington’s turnout estimate. I recognize that this is imperfect on my part – but at least I’m WAY ahead of Clinton’s campaign in that at least I’m trying to base my estimate on some objective, fair fact.
So here’s my chart:
The key thing to look at on this chart is the percentage won by each of Clinton and Obama (pulled from CNN’s Election Center) and the estimate of turnout. The “popular votes” (e.g., people who showed up) assigned to each candidate is simply the total turnout estimate multiplied by the percentage won in each caucus state.
So you can see, in MY math, the totals for the primary contests and then the totals for the caucus contests. So pulling it ALL together (drumroll please):
When you use Clinton’s own criteria and apply that criteria fairly, Obama clearly wins the so-called “popular vote”.
A Closing Note
Of course, there’s only ONE math that matters:
But as long as her campaign wants to distribute misleading (and frankly dishonest), cherry-picked “popular vote” figures, I wanted to set the record straight.
Enjoy your Sunday!
Posted by: NanD | June 2, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Good point, Ravenman!
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
FIGURES DON’T LIE BUT LIARS CAN FIGURE!
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
Here’s a thought:
The Democrats do not award delegates based on the principle of one-man-one vote in the popular vote. Them’s not the Dem’s rules; never BEEN the rules. Democratic delegates ranged (just for one “fer instance”) anywhere from eight to three in different legislative districts in Texas (the districts having been drawn to have roughly equal populations). In another “fer instance” the delegates available in Pennsylvania districts ranged anywhere from nine to three (I think it a range was nine to three, maybe the biggest was only eight). These are for legislative districts of roughly equal populations mind you.
Maybe Democrats don’t like those rules now that they know about them, but those have been the rules for 20 years. Those were the rules under which Bill Clinton won two nominations.
Those are the rules under which Hillary Clinton sought the Democrats’ nomination. If she wanted to run under different rules, she should have run for the Republican nomination.
This is not to say that I find Hillary math acceptable–I do not.
Rather, this is to make the point that the Democrats have NEVER awarded delegates based on overall popular vote; never done that before anyway.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | June 2, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
NanD, thanks for providing this info on the vote counts! HRC’s camp constantly lies to the American people on her so-called popular vote count….really sad.
Posted by: Henry | June 2, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
“In addition, her claim to the popular vote lead is an outright LIE intended to deceive HONEST, HARDWORKING VOTERS! ”
………and based on HRC’s history, you expected her to be truthful?
Gobama!
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
COUNT ALL THE VOTES, INCLUDING CAUCUSES!
I thought Hillary’s mantra is: “Count Every Vote.” If that is the case, why doesn’t she want to count the votes of Alaska, American Samoa, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, Nebraska, Washington, Hawaii and Wyoming? They all voted by caucus and, they voted for Obama. Could that be the reason she DOES NOT want every vote to count?
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
I have NO PROBLEM with Obama! He is a man of integrity and a God-send!
He’s the best candidate to take over the presidency from the convict and hoodlum who claims it now and keep it from the prevaricators who would wrest it from him on a pack of lies, HRC and John McBush!
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
For crying out loud, Mack! Who really cares? A liar is a liar.
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Can you understand that people have problems with Obama and it doesn’t have anything to do with Hillary losing? Obama created his own problems, yet he points the finger at everyone else. He didn’t even have the courage to present his “resignation” letter to his beloved congregation. Explaining to them why he feels that he needs to leave the church now after supporting them and their agenda for 20 years.
Posted by: Mack | Jun 2, 2008 1:55:39 AM
_____________________
Any racist wanting to find a rationalization to justify not voting against Obama will find one, no matter how specious.
The Clinton’s Negative Campaign
Bill: “Well you know Jesse Jackson won SC in 86, it’s not a big deal.
Bill: on Obama‘s campaign. : It’s a “fairy tale, give me a break.”
Bill: “Wouldn’t it be nice to have TWO LOYAL AMERICANS running for president?”
Hillary: “You don’t get to choose your family, but you choose your pastor. (Countless times on TV) She chose Bill.
Hillary: Tons of “BITTER” comments.
Hillary: Elitism: “It is clear that the uneducated, hard working Americans – WHITE AMERICANS – vote for me overwhelmingly. They are my core base.”
On whether Obama is a Muslim: “Not as far as I know.”
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
People act like her plane had touched down in Disney World, and Mickey handed her the key to the kingdom. The soldiers were wearing combat gear, so they were concerned for their safety.
Posted by: Mack | Jun 2, 2008 2:01:12 AM\
———————
No sale. Soldiers on airbases alway were combat gear, but civilians under “sniper fire” don’t stop to hear a poem from a nine-year-old girl and then casually stroll to their waiting transportation along with their nine-year-old daughter, a guitar player and a comedian. Where was the sax player?
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
What do you call the hate that was flying around TUCC? That’s not racism? His mentor is a racist and he supported and condoned his racist rantings for 20 years.
_______________
“hate flying around? As I said, a racist will find any justification for not voting for Obama, no matter how specious.
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
Did you know HRC defended the Black Panthers?
What group are you calling an extreme racist segment of the black community?
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
Soldiers in US bases wear full combat gear?
Posted by: Mack | Jun 2, 2008 2:12:54 AM
___________________
In areas designated “combat zones” yes. But that designation does not mean the area is always dangerous. You never did explain why she casually strode across the tarmac and took the time to have a poem read to her by a nine-year-old girl accompanied only by her nine-year-old daughter, a guitar player and a comedian. No sax player. And don’t you remember she even admitted she “misspoke.” read lied.
Posted by: rhbate | June 2, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
When is the Democratic Party going to making “whining about irrelevant popular vote counts” part of it’s official platform?
Posted by: jB | June 2, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
See, jB, she’s already making a mockery of her own party for her own ends.
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am
I am a big Obama fan and I am very excited about the prospect that he will eventually get the nomination. But people, please act like “grown folk” and give Senator Clinton the respect she deserves. No doubt if she would have won the nomination I would have voted for her, and I expect her supporters to do the same when he wins the nomination. When the rhetoric fans down and emotions have cooled, we will remember what we are. Not “Obamites or Clintonites”, but Democrats first and foremost. We must rally around Senator Obama and take back the White House. He can do it. We must swallow our pride and hold our tongue and help him do it.
Posted by: SP | June 2, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
I’ll feel better when Obama takes the oath of office. No, I don’t believe that anyone who doesn’t support Obama is a rascist anymore than I believe that anyone who doesn’t support HRC is a sexist.
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
It is sadly becoming clear when The Democratic Party needed Hillary the most to Unite and accept she has not been chosen as the nominee, she is refusing bluntly to accept reality and truth.
However much she keeps fighting the only person she is damaging is now her own political career, as with the attitude she is showing Hillary is kicking the Democratic Party in the stomach and she will be finished sadly politically for just what is another major error of Judgement.
Posted by: John B Sheffield | June 2, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
SP–really quite beautiful. But how can the perceived weakened trust be restored without insulting America’s intelligence? Extraordinary diplomacy will be needed, and inspired PR; fortunately the Senator from Illinois has both.
Posted by: Curious | June 2, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am
“Extraordinary diplomacy will be needed, and inspired PR; fortunately the Senator from Illinois has both.”
So well said, Curious and so true.
Posted by: reason | June 2, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am
One thing we’ve learned since 2001: You can’t trust anything readers say in their comments on the “internets.” So many of you claiming that you’ll vote for McCain over Obama are offering arguments that are so blatantly absurd, so badly spelled, in such twisted, incomprehensible syntax, and often with such palpable undercurrents of racism, that it’s obvious — to me at least — that you’re not Democrats.
That you continue to believe your remarks could influence anyone only tells me how idea-poor and desperate the GOP has become. Time to look into your souls and repent for the hundreds of thousands of displaced in Iraq, the tens of thousands of wounded, and thousands of dead.
In the meantime, America will be turning the page on you. Goodbye and good luck when you meet your Maker!
Posted by: Frank | June 2, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am
Well…Everyone wonders why Hillary supporters threaten to vote for McCain? It is simple… She planted it in their heads in March that only her and McCain are experienced and Obama is not.
The mystery is no longer a mystery. She bashed a member of her own party and endorsed a Republican and sent the message..”If I don’t win the nomination vote for McCain”.
The superdelegates should consider this when making their decisions. She was willing to divide the party and suggest that Democrats vote Republican if she did not win. She shouldn’t be rewarded for that. She is a very selfish woman!
Posted by: Lene' | June 2, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am
Yes Hillary, count every vote, except of course when you are trying to claim that you are leading, then of course only count the votes you want to.
Posted by: count every vote? | June 2, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am
Hillary and McCain voted for Iraq war, along with other 75 senators that should 1) serve jail time, 2) try to compensate at least tiny fraction of 10 billions $$$/month for the war, and 3) never ever occupate any government job. They certainly should not be seriously considered for this race.
Posted by: Al, California | June 2, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am
Some serious questions to all of the Hillary supporters. Do you actually love the Clintons more than your own country? Would you actually vote for our country to have four/eight more years of the same policies as we’ve had in the George W Bush era, just because your candidate didn’t win the nomination? Are you actually saying that you’d spite your own kids and grandkids future because you love Hillary more than them?
NOW, a comment for the Hillary supporters. When this nation was founded, it was one man, one vote. A conservative vote doesn’t count any more than a liberal vote. Instead of complaining about how liberals stole the nomination from Clinton, perhaps you should ask yourself what you need to do to gain those votes in the next election. Do you think Hillary would win WITHOUT those voters in November? Can the Democratic party afford to see more and more liberal voters switching over to Ralph Nader in every presidential election?
Posted by: Johnny, Alabama | June 2, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am
I hope you “Democrats for McCain” people will enjoy sending your children off to fight the wars that he wants this country to fight. I hope you can look your daughters in the eye when Roe v. Wade is overturned and they can’t get a legal abortion. I hope you’ll be happy when there are more hurricanes and tornadoes caused by an increase in global warning. I hope you’ll enjoy paying ever-increasing costs for a gallon of gas.
If you want to keep believing the ever-changing rules the Clinton campaign has been selling and the ever-changing lies they’ve been telling, go ahead.
Posted by: Molly Weasley | June 2, 2008, 5:37 am 5:37 am
How can Obama be a loser if he’s winning? Hillary ran a bad campaign. I’m not saying she is a bad person, just she got bad advice. She lost fair and square. It’s like sports, everything else is just arguing about the calls…
Posted by: Travis | June 2, 2008, 5:53 am 5:53 am
I do not see how any person could believe anything this woman says. She does not have the lead in the popular vote. Hillary is a liar. That’s bad for America…
Posted by: American Woman | June 2, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am
People keep calling Obama a far left whacko…
What policy places him farther to the left than Mrs. Clinton? His lightly more conservative and prcessual approacgh to health care? His almost fiscally conservative tax cut proposals?
There almost identical foreign policy, where the only difference is that his stance on talking to the eladers of enemy states is supported by many leading Republican thinkers?
How is he more liberal than Hillary Clinton?
Posted by: lollarossa | June 2, 2008, 6:38 am 6:38 am
I have no problem with any Clinton supporter not wanting to vote for Obama in the GE as the kindest thing I can say about her is that she is despicable. If your feelings against Obama are as strong as mine against HRC than I can’t fault you.
Whether Obama wins or not I consider 2008 to be a success – Obama has broken our addiction to the Washington Democratic Consulting Class, the DLC and the “special interest” money people. Breathtaking! And that’s real change I can believe in!
Posted by: Dutch | June 2, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am
lollarossa,
Obama wants to raise income and capital gain taxes. His spending proposals are huge. His healthcare plan mandates children insurance but lives mothers without. He voted for the Patriot act, war funding, Bush/Chenney energy bill, etc.
Conservative is small government, low taxes, non-ingerention of government in citizens lives except for providing the security for them.
Obama campaigned for Joe Liberman. Is he really for ending the war?
Posted by: magda | June 2, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
I am glad Hillary has not backed down yet. If only Gore had her persistence in 2000 we might still have a World Trade Center. In the end I believe that Dem’s will rally around who ever the nominee turns out to be. I voted for Hillary in the primary and will most likely be voting for Obama in the general election.
Posted by: KD | June 2, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am
Dentuso says: This is a horribly dishonest argument, and with each passing day it paints everyone as fools.
Well Hillary does brag about her base being UNEDUCATED!
Posted by: superdelegate | June 2, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
I want to state that if Obama was a different type of candidate he would have advocated for him receiving no votes from Michigan. Because the bigger picture is that “undecideds” were given to him. They used exit polls and surveys to “give” him votes. That sets a very bad precedent for our electorate process.
Also, because of the blatant intent by the State of Michigan’s Democratic party to go before New Hampshire the entire vote should be eliminated and not counted. Both candidates should have taken that stand!
Posted by: Bob | June 2, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Never was there a more convincing argument made than exists in these comments for denying both of these candidates the nomination and turning to a unifier at the convention.
I’m convinced neither of these candidates has any chance of winning in November and I seem to be the only person on here that remembers the past eight years and the justice that must be meted out to the Republican Party and the screaming need for repairing their damage.
Posted by: W. GILLETTT | June 2, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
What the Clinton’s don’t seem to realize is the eras of the Clinton is over and there is a new sheriff in town and his name is Barack Obama!
Posted by: Daniel | June 2, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
First, let me say that I am quite thankful not to be a part of the Democrat Party, given what I have witnessed in the last few days. The fact that Senator Clinton and her supporters have been allowed to behave in the manner that they have regarding Florida and Michigan, in my opinion, reveal a real weakness of leadership. Do we teach our children that rules are made to be broken and challenged because they interfere with what they want. I think not. And the notion that untruths which are coined as “spin” are OK is simply a sign of poor character. It is my hope that Senator Obama will maintain the integrity and honesty that he appears to possess. Only time will tell…
Posted by: NY Independent | June 2, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
We’ve got people here saying the media didn’t give Hilary enough credit for Puerto Rico, when the election is virtually over. Others complain that Obama got ANY delegates in Michigan when nobody was supposed to get any votes AND Obama had the votes to split them 50-50.Clinton supporters give all new meaning to the term “sore losers”. Rip the party up then, we’ll be waiting for you in 2012.
Posted by: lakeqi | June 2, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
For all of the Clinton supporters carping about the four delegates in the Michigan solution, how about going by what your candidate has said and urge those delegates to change their mind? If you think your case is so strong, flip the delegates but I think you’ll find that not too many people are willing to jump aboard a sinking ship…or is that the real problem here?
Posted by: BobW Rochester, NY | June 2, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
KD – That is the spirit of a democrat. I would have done the same thing had Hillary was the nominee even though I voted for Obama in the Primary.
One thing for sure is there are a lot of folks who are not thinking with their brain making statements like McCain the Hero is getting my vote if Barack is the nominee. Well, I used to think that way but the closer I looked at McBush, I can never imagine voting for the guy. It was obvious; my emotions had gotten the best out of me. That I think is foolish. I say to those who are in my boat to take a chill pill and re-evaluate or renew their way of thinking. If you don’t have conviction to the democratic principles, you were never a dem if you plan on voting for Bush’s third term. People have to wake up and smell the coffee…it is over and Hillary is not the nominee. That is a reality and democrats have to unite to defeat McCain in Nov. Let’s not forget, Hillary’s loss will be forgotten but how she handles her loss will not be. Regardless of the razor thin margin, a loss is a loss even if it is by half a point. Hillary has to be a sport like KD. Glad to hear your view!
Posted by: Daniel | June 2, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
An American in Canada for David –
It is easy for an American living in Canada spreading division. Most I know who left America could not stand Bush or Bush’s third term. Don’t be sad, be glad Hillary lost because you ain’t seen nothing yet. We the grass roots are going to clean Washington by the million fold. However, stop that racist rant tone. Don’t be a sore loser!
Posted by: Daniel | June 2, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I applaud this post as an Obama supporters but most importantly as a Democrat. I don’t know how folks call themselves true Democrats when they are getting all emotionally involved with a candidate when frankly it should be about what the Democratic party represents in its totality. You folks who can’t vote for Obama or Hillary but instead vote for McCain were never Democrats in the first place IMO. I work on Capitol Hill and frankly you people don’t know the candidate until you have worked with them. They are all power-hungry and arrogant trying to get across their issues and legislation so Obama, Hillary, Gore, Kerry doesn’t really matter on the Hill and some of you are too foolish to see that.
I am glad Hillary has not backed down yet. If only Gore had her persistence in 2000 we might still have a World Trade Center. In the end I believe that Dem’s will rally around who ever the nominee turns out to be. I voted for Hillary in the primary and will most likely be voting for Obama in the general election.
Posted by: Michelle | June 2, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I am so sick of these spoiled “Democrats” saying that if Hillary doesn’t get the nomination they will vote for McCain. You are NO DEMOCRAT! If you are really that shallow, then McCain deserves your vote. I worked for Bill Clinton’s campaign and I was very disappointed in the kind of campaign they ran. At times I felt like I would never support her if she were the nominee. But to resort to voting for McCain, who represents the very same Bush ideology, that is worse than petty. Take a good look at McCain, he doesn’t even know day to day what is going on. He has serious anger management problems. Sounds like your choice of him over Obama speaks volumes about you. So if you cant be an adult, then the Republicans deserve you!
Posted by: Anny | June 2, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
The probable outcome for final selection will be at the convention. It will be very difficult for HRC to cease her efforts since she and a good portion of her constituency have bought into the concept that she is due the delegates in Florida and Michigan. While the debate is over 55 half delegates going to Obama and 4 half delegates allocated away from her, it will soon grow to the same number in full delegates. As long as that parallel metric (2210) is not reached she will not fold, and that metric can only be reached at the convention.
Her strategy is working. She is proving to her party that her constituency will not support Obama. She has fanned the emotion on the Michigan and Florida issue to a point where hundreds of thousands emails will be sent out to the superdelegates attempting to intimidate their current or prior choice. Her effort will continue over the summer.
She hopes that once the superdelegates understand that the party (her constintuency) will not come in behind Obama but Obama’s will, the superdelegates will start to shift toward her. She will nag the party until one of two things happen:
1. She will win the nomination
2. She will be slapped down by a torrent of superdelegate votes very soon
If number 1. happens she will be pleased and if number 2. happens she will be excused from actively supporting Obama.
Either she is nominated now or she will be nominated in 2012 on an “I told you so” or “You have a chance to make it right” slogan.
Obama made a mistake in pivoting too early. The Clintons cannot be trusted.
Posted by: Hal | June 2, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
The last thing this country needs is another eight years of an egotistical, delusional, politician like we have now.
Note to Hillary: Please just shut-up and go away. You didn’t win…get over it!
Posted by: tutu | June 2, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Hey Vanessa, how about according to the rules that she and Harold Ickes argued for when this process started…the rules that said Michigan would have NO delegates? Funny how those get tossed in the wind. Meanwhile, the Clinton camp continues to calculate the popular vote by using a formula that gives ZERO votes to Obama, so they can continue make their specious claim that they won the popular vote. They’ve learned a lot from Bush…if you repeat a lie enough, folks like you will believe it.
Posted by: Craig | June 2, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Okay, this is it folks. The primary is ending. Like it or not, Clinton lost– she lost in delegates, states, and by popular vote. Time to choose– are you a democrat or republican. Hillary? You first.
Posted by: mona lisa | June 2, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
there is no nominee on tuesday we will fight you to th convention or Clinton will go Independant… Obama and the bots are shameless!
Posted by: dem38 | June 2, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Clinton won California, New York, and Florida. Do you think Obama can win without those states? I think not.
Posted by: jmt | June 2, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Complaining about 4 delegates?? Personally I think Clinton should have been penalized for causing such division between Michigan, Florida and the democratic party. Harold Ickes her foul mouthed advisors voted for these rules and the sanctions and all candidates knew and agreed to them before the campaign started. The way Clinton has fired that situation up and keep it fired up is a big shame on her. She has caused a very divisive campaign that has probably hurt the party she claims to love. So I think 4 delegates is being very fair to Clinton…
Posted by: misouri | June 2, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Wow! This is incredibly sad. We have a process in the Democratic party to nominate our candidate and Obama has followed every rule and come out on top. Maybe he wasn’t your first choice, but you don’t always get your first choice in a democracy. (Clintonites whine about 4 votes when she’s down by hundreds? Come on! She could have had delegates out of MI and FL.)
Grow up and act like an adult. Do you think McCain was the first choice of most Republicans? Heck no. But they will fall in line and vote for them because they are disciplined. Obama will be a superb President. When that happens, will you still be whining?
Posted by: CG | June 2, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
I don’t see the Democrats uniting. After what the DNC did, and now with Obama trying to appease Hillary to get her support, I see further division. The 17+million Clinton supporters actually hold the keys to this election, not Obama, not McCain, but Clinton supporters. I see most of them, if not all of them, voting for McCain in the GE. Many Independents will go with McCain basically because they don’t know Obama and because of his inexperience and “shady” past. Obama may have a chance in 2012, but not in 2008. Sorry, but get ready to say President John McCain…..Obama is toast!
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Ken Wells…I agree, the DLC will stop at nothing and I’m afraid that there is going to be turmoil at the convention. The DLC will actually, in my opinion, be against Obama and there is nothing the DNC or the SuperDelegates can do about it. I don’t see Hillary running as an Independent, but I also don’t see the Democratic party uniting either. This nomination or victory for Obama will be short-lived. The Dems have played right into the hands of the GOP this year, and they are licking their chops to destroy Obama, which they will. You can’t blame Hillary or Obama, but it rests in the DNC, namely, Dean, Pelosi, Kerry, Kennedy. This year is a sad year for the Democrats. We only thought the race was bad between Obama and Clinton, now the war begins and I’m afraid the GOP will win this war!
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
In every presidential election they have won, the Democrats have solidified their historic link to white workers, not dismissed them. Obama and the champions of a new party coalition appear to think that everything has suddenly changed, simply because of the force of their own desires. In any event, Obama had shown no ability thus far to attract the one constituency that has always spelled the difference between victory and defeat for the Democratic Party. The party must now decide whether to go along with Obama and renounce its own heritage — and tempt the political fates.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
The Barack Obama campaign and its sympathizers have begun to articulate much more clearly what they mean by their vague slogan of “change” – nothing less than usurping the historic Democratic Party, dating back to the age of Andrew Jackson, by rejecting its historic electoral core: white workers and rural dwellers in the Middle Atlantic and border states.
Without a majority of those voters, the Democrats have, since the party’s inception in the 1820s, been incapable of winning the presidency. The Obama advocates declare, though, that we have entered an entirely new political era. It is not only possible but also desirable, they say, for Democrats to win by turning away from those whom “progressive” pundits and bloggers disdain variously as “Nascar man,” “uneducated,” “low information” whites, “rubes, fools, and hate-mongers” who live in the nation’s “shitholes.”
Having attempted, with the aid of a complicit news media, to brand Hillary Clinton as a racist — by flinging charges that, as the historian Michael Lind has shown, belong “in black helicopter/grassy knoll territory,” Obama’s supporters now fiercely claim that Clinton’s white working class following is also essentially racist. Favoring the buzzword language of the academic left, tinged by persistent, discredited New Left and black nationalist theories about working-class “white skin privilege,” a vote against Obama has become, according to his fervent followers, “a vote for whiteness.”
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
The one constituency which has always spelled the difference between victory and defeat is whom? Not women; not hispanics; not undereducated appalachian “Regan democrats? Who exactly are you talking about. The only consituency consistant to the Democrats has been the black vote.
Posted by: easyenough | June 2, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
I am a life long democrat. And I am one of the 17+ million Clinton supporters that will NOT vote for Obama. But I won’t sit home either–after the way the deck has been stacked against Hillary. My vote will go to McCain as a act of protest against the Democratic party. The media continues to say that Obama has work to do to bring the party together. He can never bring the party together. In fact, the DNC further divided the party on Saturday by taking 4 earned delegates from Clinton and reallocating them to Obama. This was nothing more than a punch in the eye and Obama’s supported this effort. These are votes cast by thousands of individuals for Hillary Clinton and then reallocated to Obama. I don’t care what candidate you support–this is nothing short of election fraud and stacking the deck. I urge Hillary and team to run as an independant in protest of what “our” the “democratic” party has become. If she is unwilling to abandon the party, I urge all Clinton supporters to vote McCain in ’08.
Posted by: Julia | June 2, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
@ Julia:
After Saturday, I saw signs in yard stating “No Bama”. I think the Dems are fooling themselves that the party will be united. It won’t and can’t be. This was a year of “firsts”, first woman candidate, first black candidate. Now, the DNC has destroyed the party, the DLC will not let Obama go unscathed, and now millions of Clinton supporters will vote for McCain in protest. As I said earlier, Obama’s victory will be short-lived. He only thught the fight with Hillary was bad, wait until the GOP with thier full arsenal attack him. The problem will be, is that he won’t have a united Democractic party supporting him…its divided, the GOP know this and will use this a trump card against Obama. Sorry, but Obama is toast in the GE. I know it, Obama supporters know it, the DNC is now realizing it, and most importantly, the GOP knows it.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Julia, I would be unhappy if my candidate had lost. That’s understandable. But to vote against all your principles borders on (to put it nicely), “cutting off your nose to spite your face.”
Will you abandon those principles? If so, what does that say?
Posted by: easyenough | June 2, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
To my wonderful supporters:
First I would like to thank each and everyone of you for the support you have given me, Its been one heck of a ride and I couldn’t have gotten this far without you! So Thank YOU!
I know I have said some nasty things regarding Obama and I had the media play over and over that Rev Wright fragment of a very long sermon.
But I tell you now, I am supporting Mr Obama for President. He is a very intelligent, sophisticated, strong, caring man. There is no one more qualified to answer that call at 3 am than Obama. I am asking my supporters to help unite the best party in our nation by joining me in showing our support for Obama.
Thank You.
We can expect a speech like this soon?
Posted by: IslandGirl | June 2, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Hey easyenough,
I don’t agree with David but you are flat our wrong. The black vote has been important to the party since the 60s but while important–it can not stand alone. Since FDR, no democratic president has ever been elected without winning the appalachia area, which enables a democratic win in Ohio and West Virginia. Obama’s campaign is famous for calling out that he is doing just as well with white working class voters as Kerry and Gore. The problem is that both Kerry and Gore lost the election. This is why Hillary is such a stronger candidate than Obama. The only democratic president since FDR to win two terms was Clinon and he won these two states. Obama may be the nominee but once again our process has delivered a one term candiate at best and it is questionable if he can win at all. McCain leads Obama in both Ohio and West Virginia by a large margin. (Clinton currently leads McCain in both).
Posted by: Julia | June 2, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
The popular vote thing has gotten really laughable. Nevermind the point about how its not the metric used, but Clinton’s claim to have won the popular vote while dismissing the popular vote from caucus states that don’t report those numbers is just bizarre.
And of course there’s the Michigan oddity, but on caucus states alone the argument is really just, well, laughable.
Posted by: Paul | June 2, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
@ david from texas
Hillary would be toast in the GE for the same reasons you list as to why Obama would be toast.
We can unite and win this thing. That is unless you’re truly a republican posing as a democrat to keep the pot bubbling.
Posted by: easyenough | June 2, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Easyenough – I didn’t see David’s reasons, but I agree, Clinton would have no chance in the general (though its academic at this point).
She has negatives at 54. Sixty percent of all voters think she’s dishonest. She would energize the Republicans like no one else could.
Its bizarre that people are actually touting her as the more electable of the two.
Posted by: Paul | June 2, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
@ Julia
A thoughtful response, Julia. I don’t totally disagree. But I maintain that we cannot, must not live under four more years of republican administration.
As hard as it might appear to be now, we must end this bitter debate, unite behind the candidate, and defeat McLame in November.
Posted by: easyenough | June 2, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
easyenough:
No, I’m not a Republican, but I am using logic here. You are right, Hillary would be toast if the reverse was true. Hillary, even though she says she wants the party to be united, I don’t think her followers will agree, and the DLC will give Obama hell. Added to this fact that Obama can’t get the blue-collar vote because of his remarks against them, and all the other remarks he has made, I just don’t see a uniting. I’m sorry, just using logic…you would be wise to do so. Plus, by the DNC taking delegates away from Hillary, this only adds fuel to the fire.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
does it bother any one else that $100 Mill Hill is still asking for donations from people who cant afford it so that she can pay off her own debt?
there’s just something repugnant about a millionaire a hundred times over begging for money. Seriously.
Posted by: jb | June 2, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
count every vote, including caucuses in:
Alaska
Colorado
Hawaii
Idaho
Iowa
Kansas
Maine
Minnesota
Nebraska
Nevada
North Dakota
Texas (Caucus only)
Washington
Wyoming
SOME popular votes for Obama in Michigan
and Hillary gets an F in Math
Posted by: ralph | June 2, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
David:
I don’t know how old you are. I’m older than the dirt under God’s rug. So I’ve seen worse fights than this.
As you clearly lay out, it will be HARD to unite. However; IF people are willing to move beyond the pettiness (not always a good bet), than the hispanics, blacks, new young voters, and currently bitter Hillary women, would be a large enough coalition to put Obama on top.
Posted by: easyenough | June 2, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
What kind of journalism doesn’t correct her popular vote math?
Posted by: Brett | June 2, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Easyenough,
I do understand that people want to bring the party together but this was not the way to do it. The DNC had the opportunity to make this right on Saturday without taking anything away from Obama. The reality is that there are more than just hurt feeling among the democratic women I know. I am truly offended by the way Hillary has been treated this entire year. I understand that other may support a different candidate but tell me honestly….if Barrack’s first name were Bernice but with everything else exactly the same (same style, resume, experience etc.) do you honestly believe that Hillary would not be our nominee right now. I am not sure that this divide can be healed this year.
Posted by: Julia | June 2, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
@ easyenough……I’ve been around the blocks a few times in these elections. I was born in the fifties, so have seen many come and go. I’m a lifelong Democrat, but have never seen the party divided as it has this year. I didn’t vote for Hillary in the Texas primary but for Obama…however, my opinion of him has changed greatly and I will be adament, I wish I could recant my vote for him. With that being said, I think the DNC has giving Hillary a raw deal this year, and the “StuperDelegates” are just that…stupid. I’m not advocating division, but its there and we know it. When Obama played the “typical” race card, he lost my vote. When I heard Dr. Kings son state that Obama has undone everything his father worked so hard to correct, he lost my vote. I could go on and on…..however, I am not a Hillary supporter either. As it stands, like so many, I may be chopping off my nose in spite of my face, but I can’t see myself voting for Obama in the GE. I would rather have 4 more years of GOP rule than to subject my country to Obama….myself and 17+million other Democrats feel the same way. Sorry, but thats the writing on the wall for 2008.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Many people, particularly the sort of who would post a comment here, believes passionately in their respective candidate. Both have their flaws. That being said, Sen Obama will be the nominee of the democratic party. The alternative to Sen. Obama is 4 more years of Bush Lite in the form of a McCain presidency. If you feel that this is a price worth paying in order to allow the possibility of a reprise performance by Sen. Clinton, then I can not argue with that view. There are few policy issues dividing the two candidates. The primary one is of race v gender, which is an emotive but not a rational basis upon which to base a decision.
Sen. Clinton has in the Democratic primary campaign avoided a detailed recitation of prior Clinton scandals (too numerous to enumerate here). This would not be the case in a general election. Sen. Obama has been less fortunate in this respect. This may invalidate her argument that she is the superior general election candidate, and in any event the point is moot as she will not be the nominee.
Therefore, there is only one question – If you are a Clinton supporter, can you sufficiently detatch yourself from the emotional commitment to Sen. Clinton to vote your core beliefs. If not, vote McCain and accept the consequences.
Posted by: loki50 | June 2, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
TIME TO SUCK UP Obama supporters.
You will not get enough Hillary supporters to join the weakest candidate in history..He better put her on that ticket or for sure he will lose big time. Like or not there it is baby..
Posted by: SD | June 2, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
@ david….
that’s just sad…and I don’t agree that everyone of the 17 million will side with you…
@ julia
you strike me as being very thoughtful and intelligent in your comments (no condecention implied there)… I share with you another woman’s comments from another blog:
“I fail to see what Hillary expects to gain from her increasingly bizarre statements about popular vote and about switching by superdelegates. In my mind, she has made herself less desirable as a candidate as she her whining about race, about sex, about just about anything she can………..it all doesnt change the fact she blew what was the race that was suppposed to be hers by her own stupidity and ego. Time for the Democratic party to move on from the Clintons, who in any case are only in it for themselves, and to Obama and others who want to bring politics into the 21 century by facing up to today’s issues not yesterdays.
The women who support Hillary who think they can take their marbles and go home just dont know how to play the game in a co-educational world. They lose in the end, but luckily they cant take the rest of us down with them. I speak as a 50 yr old woman who is tired of the display of immaturity of women who should have learned better in the last 30 years.”
Posted by: easyenough | June 2, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
I am a happy Obama supporter but I can understand Hillary people being disappointed but to vote against your best interests just for spite is wrong.
I would like to point out that Cynthia McKinney is the Green Party nominee for president.
A vote for her would be at least be consistant with progressive values.
Posted by: Ken Wells | June 2, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
@ easyenough….you are entitled to your opinion and me to mine, I respect that. Maybe not all 17+ million will go against Obama, but the majority will and he will lose the election. Most Obama supporters, I believe, just assumed that when he becomes the nominee, that Clinton supporters will just fall in line behind them……this will not happen and you can see that the division is becoming more and more clear. If Obama wins the nomination Tuesday, Wednesday morning will began a new chapter in the Democratic party…that chapter will be called “Divide We Fall”. I know, I will not vote for Obama in the GE….but, will vote for McCain. I also champion Clinton supporters and other Democrats to do the same.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Ken Wells stated:
“I can understand Hillary people being disappointed but to vote against your best interests just for spite is wrong. ”
Actually, Clinton supporters’ best interest was taken from them by the DNC….this is what’s fueling the divide.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
@ david
I would ask why, but I’m sure you have your reasons and I respect that.
@most of you who post here….
have a great day. this is a good, mostly respectful blog. it gives one hope for the future
Posted by: easyenough | June 2, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
I appreciate your comments easyenough….its nice to have a civil conversation among peers. Have a good day.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
The DP’s Primary Elections and Caucuses for their presidential candidate are carried out at the state and territorial level (Democrats Abroad counts as a state), with a proportional number of delegates going to each candidate. A majority of those delegates plus the superdelegates choose the candidate.
HRC can try to persuade them that the results of the Primary Elections signify something or other but the fact of the matter is, the flow is not going nor is it likely to go her way. Fair or not, these are the determining factors and the Clintons knows it – that’s why they’re already laying off staff; and that’s why HC for President staff members are hoping to join the Obama Campaign.
Those that want more of the same, can support John McCain. And those looking for a more substantial and nutritious political meal will support the DP’s winning candidate, as Hillary herself soon will do.
Posted by: dhinds | June 2, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
The comments here from “Democrats for McCain” and otheres who are vowing to vote for McCain are saddening. Are you really Democrats or are you Republicans trying to “egg” people on and “off the deep end”? Stop all the ranting and raving if you are Democrats. Sit down and think. You need to look at what you are saying, and you should look long and hard at yourselves. Self evaluation is needed here sans the high emotions. I’ll bet, if while you are ranting and raving, should you look in the mirror, you would scare even yourselves. How does a woman get to be President? By “hook or by crook”? By rule bending? By creating new rules? By having a large angry constituency? If she “gets it all”, what happens then? Where is her credibility? Where is the respect that should come with the office? And I mean respect from everyone-here at home and abroad. Surely you see what McCain is offering. He doesn’t have the same philosophy about so many things that “Democrats for McCain” say they have, yet you would vote for him. Would you really? It’s called “cutting off your nose to spite your face”. Look at yourselves. It’s a sad day in America, for I do believe it’s several other comments that you are thinking, but you don’t want to speak them out aloud.
Posted by: Linda F. | June 2, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
For a Progressive of any stripe to vote for anyone in the Neocon camp is a betrayal of all they have claimed they stand for.
You see, this election is not about any one personallity but about war, torture, international relations, the Constitution with it’s Bill of Rights, health care and a fair shake for everyone in this conservative damaged economy.
Posted by: Ken Wells | June 2, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
It’s so easy to say you’ll vote for McCain as long as you don’t have a family member serving in Iraq. I submit that anyone with children may be at risk in this endless and unwinnable war.
Posted by: xray | June 2, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
To Linda F….you are entitled to your opinion…however, the DNC has made the party divisive, along with the so-called “stuperdelegates”. Dems have been hurt deeply by this whole process, which has been a farce from day one. I’m not advocating change, but facing reality….many, many Dems will be voting GOP or Independent this year and not for Obama. He will not win in the GE….you know it, I know it, and so does the party itself. Even Donna Bazille, a stauch Obama superdelegate has stated it is likely Obama will win in the GE because of party division, and she is African American. The writing is on the wall.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Correction:
To Linda F….you are entitled to your opinion…however, the DNC has made the party divisive, along with the so-called “stuperdelegates”. Dems have been hurt deeply by this whole process, which has been a farce from day one. I’m not advocating change, but facing reality….many, many Dems will be voting GOP or Independent this year and not for Obama. He will not win in the GE….you know it, I know it, and so does the party itself. Even Donna Bazille, a stauch Obama superdelegate has stated it is likely Obama will NOT win in the GE because of party division, and she is African American. The writing is on the wall.
Posted by: david from texas | June 2, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I find it interesting that HRC wants the delegates from all fifty states, but she is going to cherry pick the states to make her case for the popular vote. The Republicans were spot on when they called her divisive. I hope that she will prove the Republicans wrong and make her speech Tuesday night. HRC: Please use your power for good, not evil!!
Posted by: Hoping for Change | June 2, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
I can assure you that neither Barack Obama nor anyone close to him is criticizing Hillary Clinton as a person or for deciding to continue the race. At present, neither candidate has received a majority of the votes needed to assure his or her candidacy, although that is likely to change by the end of the week.
Posted by: dhinds | June 2, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Sure, I can understand the Democrats for McCain.
After all, what’s a few more litmus-tested pro-life Supreme Court justices in return for a candidate who’s “ready”…
…(to learn the difference between Shi-ite and Sunni).
Posted by: Paul | June 2, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Sure, McCain wants to continue pursuing some undefineable “victory” in Iraq, and even jokes about bombing Iran. But he’s got to be better than anyone with a whacky pastor.
Posted by: Paul | June 2, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
I mean what are we going to do – elect an inexperienced guy from Illinois at a time of national crisis? That would be just crazy, and unprecedented (except for the last time we did it).
No, of course we aren’t. We’re going to elect John McCain, who has intimate knowledge of foreign affairs through his shopping junkets in artificially secure Baghdad markets.
Posted by: Paul | June 2, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Okay, we did elect an inexperienced guy from Illinois before. But that crisis wasn’t anything like the one we face today, in which we are shaking in our boots at the meer mention of two-bit dictators and some guys living in central Asian caves.
Posted by: Paul | June 2, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
It’s about McCain now not Hillary!!!
Bush-hugging McCain has made fear, nation-building occupation and still more war as the center of his run for the presidency.
Remember…
The Republicans were in charge;
when warnings about terrorism were ignored before 9/11,
when Afghanistan and the battle against the Taliban and Al Qaeda was abandoned,
when a war of choice against a country that was not an imminent threat was begun,
when a war in Iraq was begun based on lies,
when this ill-advised war was begun without a cultural understanding of the people,
when far too few troops were used for that illegal action in Iraq,
when lawlessness and looting were tolerated,
when the Iraq army was disbanded,
when troop armor and gear were kept sup-par for the mission,
when a forced vote was held too early before Sunni concerns were addressed,
when torture was allowed to become administration policy,
when illegal detentions became administration policy,
when spying on Americans became administration policy,
when support for war profiteers became administration policy,
when habeas corpus became something not available to all,
when posse comitatus became abandoned,
when spying on American citizens became an okay thing to do,
when a culture of corruption was allowed to flourish at home,
when congressional oversight was abandoned,
when doing the same failed thing over and over without success became the plan,
when our war dead became something to hide in shame,
when the injured military and their families were treated without proper care or respect,
when terrorism was allowed to grow world wide while claiming success,
when fear became a weapon of propaganda against the American people,
when failure became always someone else’s fault,and when lies and propaganda became an acceptable substitute for truth when dealing with the public,
when obsene debt, weak dollar, $100+ a barrel of oil, inflation and recession have appeared.
For these reasons and many more Iraq has become the volatile mess it now is.
For these reasons and many more impeachment is well deserved for the Bush/Cheney cabal.
For these reasons and many more McCain does not deserve the presidency.
Posted by: Ken Wells | June 2, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Are those Hillary Clinton’s supporters, bitter because of her primary loss, going to shoot themselves in the foot like poor and middle class southerns have done in so many past elections when they voted Republican aginst their best interests? Her supports may dislike Senator Obama intensely but consider his policies and views on government are almost identical to Senator Clinton’s. One, which should be of prime importance to Senator Clinton’s female base, is a woman’s choice to choose. Senator Obama has a 100% rating on women’s reproductive rights. John McCain in the white house will most certainly have the opportunity to appoint one new justice to the supreme court and very likely two. He has promised to appoint justices with an antipaty toward Roev Wade. Two states will have severe anti-choice laws which will be sent to the supreme court. There is no doubt that with one or two new reactionary justices, Roe v Wade will be history and reproductive rights will be back to pre-1973. Back alley abortions, now relic of the past, will once again become common for those women who cannot travel to countries (or perhaps more progressive states) where abortion is legal. With liltte doubt, many will die. So, perhaps those supporters of Senator Clinton who vow to vote McCain, or stay home, or write in her name should sit down and give serious consideration to their November decisions. I personally detest the syncop;hants surrounding her and the primary battle she has run (though personally I have a very positive attitute toward her), If she were the nominee there is no doubt that I would pull the lever in her favor. My reaons for supporting Senator Obama are many, none of them having to do with a dislike for Senator Clinton. I voted twice for Bill Clinton and have much respect for him and indeed for Senator Clinton personally for the immense good they have done for the American people. The question is, do we want a George Bush third term? Do we want the progressive gains made during President Clinton’s administration lost? Bitterness can be self-defeating. Let us Democrats not shoot ourselves in the foot…………or as my grandmother used to say, “Don’t cut off your nose to spite your face”.
Posted by: zeke | June 2, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
GetReal;
You should change your screen name
to Get A Clue!
The U.S. economy was great under
Ronald Reagan. He had to clean up the
economic and foreign policy mess
that incompetent and worst president in
U.S. History Jimmy Carter left him!
Posted by: reaganfan | June 2, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
HRC signed the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee AGREEMENT [PLEDGE] in January 08. Apparently SIGNING [meaning giving her “word of honor”] the DNC RBC AGREEMENT meant NOTHING and she RENEGED? So the question one must the ask oneself is, “What would she do if she were our POTUS and SIGNED a “WHITE HOUSE ORDER”, “CONGRESSIONAL BILL”, or an “AGREEMENT” with a “foreign country” and later determined to RENEGE? Do you know what that would do to our country and her presidency? I do!
The SDs will be out in force after Tuesday’s primaries and there is NO doubt that Obama will be our nominee. Clinton can take this to the convention, but it will make NO difference since all delegates will have spoken for Obama. After Tuesday, we will no longer have to even speak the clinton name – thank God. And if they, by Wednesday morning, DO NOT support Obama, then they will have NOTHING LEFT OF THEIR POLITICAL LEGACY except NEGATIVITY FROM ALL DEM OFFICIALS. I’d think it would be difficult to go back to the Senate after acting the way she did! Doubt there will be any respect towards her after the crap she has pulled during this campaign and for her lack of support for the winner, Obama!
Posted by: Disparaged | June 2, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Disparaged
you will also be humiliated in Denver Hillary is still th best candidate and either way … Obamas political career will be put to bed by november! you can take that any way you like!
Posted by: dem38 | June 2, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Hope For Change
your candidate BO is the most evil one…. ! bar none!
Posted by: dem38 | June 2, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Troll alert!
Posted by: dhinds | June 2, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Here is what I don’t understand about the popular vote count, the rules of Caucuses don’t necesarily have a popular vote count. This election is not set up as a popular vote contest. There are so many different rules for these contests that to assume a popular vote count is at all an accurate reflection of the preference of the party.
I also find it amusing that she says Obama has a ‘slight’ lead in delegates, here lead in the popular vote is far more contentious than his lead in delegates.
Posted by: markymark | June 2, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Obamanites, I encourage all of you to stop the back and forth with the Hillary supporters. Those who spew hate never intended to vote for Obama anyway. Facts are the facts, we ran a great primary campaign and outplayed the incumbent. Now its time to focus on Mcsame (McCain). Spend your energy putting out the facts on this guy and bring new members into the fold. We have a good base but need a good portion of the 120 million voters come November to win. Focus on how we can create a strong general campaign and let the GOP Bots and staunch Hillary supporters do their thing. We cannot afford to lose focus.
Posted by: Thud | June 2, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Clinton and Obama have nearly identical stances on the issues. McCain is not a moderate. He is on the opposite side of the spectrum on so many issues:
1. Anti-Choice
2. Anti-Gay rights. Not only is he against civil unions but he voted against making violence against gays a hate crime.
3. Soft on environmental protection. He doesn’t go as far as the Democratic Nominees.
4. His healthcare plan is a joke.
5. He has no plan for drawing down our forces in Iraq.
6. He flip-flopped on torture
Clinton supporters please do not shoot yourself in the foot because Clinton lost the primary. We cannot afford another Bush term, and that is exactly what a McCain presidency will be.
Posted by: greenpoint | June 2, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
I support a 3-way voting opportunity… the Democrats put up their 2 best and Republicans will put up their winner. I love it!
Posted by: SM | June 2, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
What I find disturbing after reading many of the posts here is the amount of people who say they will vote for McCain if Clinton is not the democratic nominee. What’s disturbing about this is the fact that none of these people have given a good reason to vote for McCain over Obama other than spite. Do none of you hurling these threats have at least one policy of McCain’s that you favor? Please post something of “substance”. Clinton and Obama share similar views and only differ on a few things. I would say they agree on about 95% of topics/policies. It’s pretty pathetic that 5% differing views is enough to make someone who calls themselves (or now calls themselves and independent since their candidate is not winning), vote for a person who differs with their candidates views by 98%.
Posted by: NJ | June 2, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Oh yeah the inexperienced Obama who would meet with the president of Iran with no pre-conditions, now Iran’s president claims that the countdown to wipe off Israel out of the map has begun. Yeah and some of us are stupid enough to put such a man in the White House. Dream on Obama, maybe u could be president in your make believe world, not the real world.
Posted by: Persio | June 2, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Clinton’s experience led her to vote for going to war with Iraq WITHOUT reading the intelligence report or having anyone on staff with security clearance high enough to read it for her.
Clinton’s experience suggests taking money out of our 401k plans (windfall profit tax on the oil companies) so that the average driver can afford to go out for dinner ONCE over the course of the summer less the cost of the government executing the plan is a good idea.
I don’t want that kind of experience in the oval office.
Posted by: X marks the spot | June 2, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Does any of you Hillary supports even have an idea of what McCain in office will do to this country? In 8 years the Bush Admin has done to this country and you want to spite Obama and vote for McCain. Can you and this country afford to keep these lousy policies up for another 4 years. Hope you all can afford it and I would seriously think about this if you have kids turning legal age,when this waco Republican tries to insert the draft again, are you ready to sacrifice your kids and loved ones.We need change and it wasn’t with McCain and Hillary ruined her own chances by lying from the start. She should now show some class and back out and stand behind Obama for the good of this country…
Posted by: softail | June 2, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
If Hill steals the nomination from the only black person in history who ever had a chance, she’ll be McGoverned.
Add in her racist comments, black people will boycott her in droves, and the Democrats can’t win an election without the black vote.
O can win. He’ll win all the states Kerry won in ’04, except New Hampshire- Mac has a unique relationship with that state, and he’s been campaigning there for 8 years.
O takes New Mexico if he puts Bill Richardson on the ticket, and he also carries Colorado due to the Hispanic population.
He’s gonna retain Michigan- the economy’s just too bad, and he’ll also take Ohio- again, the economy, and Virginia due to the black population.
Iowa went for Bush, but it went crazy for Obama, he cinches that. He takes the Bellwether State, not only because he’s gonna win, but because it borders Illinois.
Out of the Mississippi Valley, he takes one of three, probably Miss. itself, with the largest black population.
I think Florida will go R, but it could also flip, so he may win that state.
If he takes Florida, he wins 346-192. If he doesn’t, he still wins 319-219. Either way, he can’t lose. The numbers are actually against Mac, and as we learned in 2000, the Electoral College is really what matters.
Obama/Richardson ’08
Posted by: Dan | June 2, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Julia..
You baffle me..The DNC didn’t steal any votes from Hillary. It was an illegal election and she shouldn’t of been on the ballot anyway.The state od MI came up with their own proposal after considering all factors and it actually gave Hillary a 10 point lead which Obama graciously let her have.
As far as you “protest” goes just goes to show how you and your kind are nothing but spiteful and vindictive. You are as delusional as your candidate if you think ALL Hillary supporters are going to vote Republican.
You say the Democratic party is just “yours”…huh?????? You are NO Democrat if you vote for McCain! Your conduct is pathetic and irrational.
Anyway..it is YOUR candidate that attempted election fraud by signing off MI and FL and then keeping her name on the ballot in MI.
Posted by: Lene' | June 2, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
I keep hearing this talk about how Obama can’t win against McCain, but all of the polling I’ve seen have McCain and Obama pretty much even. And that’s with Clinton still fighting for the nominations and her supporters still exercising the “Hillary or McCain” mentality.
When Hillary concedes, there may be those of her supporters that decide to vote McCain or skip the election altogether. But a sizable portion of those voters will follow Clinton’s advice, or realize that Obama’s policy positions mirror Clinton’s, and will vote for Obama in November. That should be more than enough to give Obama a healthy bump and get him into the White House.
Obama is my first choice and Hillary is my second. She’s get my support if the roles were reversed and she were the likely nominee, but she isn’t. Clinton isn’t going to be the nominee, folks, and the only question left is whether you want to actively assist the neoconservatives in damaging this country for 4 more years.
If you truly believe that Clinton is the answer for this country, then I hope you realize that she’s got a better chance of impacting the course of this country as a senior Senatorial voice working with a Deomocratic president.
Posted by: Brian | June 2, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Democracy prevailed this past Saturday and now it’s time to unite behind the nominee. Gas at $4/gal and rising does not appeal to me. Nor does it sit well with me that young men and women have been forced to give the ultimate sacrafice in the name of W. Let’s move beyond the partisanship and embrace the goal of getting this administration out of Washington.
When the light is cast upon McC it casts a shadow of George Bush.
Posted by: Bh In Phoenix | June 2, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
The actual bottom line is you can spin this anyway you want to but the truth is Obama is leading in (legal uncontested) popular votes that are not part of the flawed process of early voting in both states. I don’t think the people of Florida or Michigan are flawed, I think the political figure heads are flawed becaue they could have secured a legal remedy but they failed to get it done, so they made a mess out of things. I respect the passion of Clinton supporters and Obama supporters alike, there is a much bigger picture to consider here like the war in Iraq, our economy and taking back the White House. Both candidates supporters need to work together and UNITE the democratic party to make sure that CHANGE occurs in Washington. If we democrats spend more time uniting our party instead of fighting among ourselves so our collective voice is heard, that voice will rumble not only in Washington, but our voice will be heard around the world. I want all Americans to UNITE so we can lead the world arena positively. Vote democratic and accept the results that were reached by the DNC. I support the democratic nominee whoever it is. I personally believe it will be Senator Barack Obama and if that is the way it is, I hope democrats show the republicans how tired of paying so much for gas and how tired of the real estate market falling apart you are. SAVE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY FIRST, then lend a helping hand around the world. Trust OBAMA and trust CLINTON to unite and get the job done in November. In closing this response I close with the highest respect for both democratic candidates and more importantly their supporters, because without us NOTHING can get done in Washington. OBAMA 2008.
Posted by: Lou | June 3, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Brilliant Di! You’ve said it all!
I hope Sen Clinton does not concede and fights on…but if she doesn’t win, I think we should honor her by uniting.
Good luck Sen.Clinton.
Posted by: Wise Ole Woman | June 3, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Thank you Wise, I agree with you, but only after she has exhausted every possible option to become President!
Posted by: Di | June 3, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm