Jun 10, 2008 10:57pm

Obama Florida Co-Chair Signs On to Bush Impeachment

Congressman Robert Wexler, D-Fla. — the Florida co-chair for the presidential campaign of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. — today announced that he has signed on to support the Articles of Impeachment against President George W. Bush, introduced this week by Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio.

"President Bush deliberately created a massive propaganda campaign to sell the war in Iraq to the American people and the charges detailed in this impeachment resolution indicate an unprecedented abuse of executive power," Wexler said. "A decision by Congress to pursue impeachment is not an option, it is a sworn duty. It is time for Congress to stand up and defend the Constitution against the blatant violations and illegalities of this Administration. Our Founding Fathers bestowed upon Congress the power of impeachment, and it is now time that we use it to defend the rule of law from this corrupt Administration."

Wexler previously ran a nationwide campaign to hold impeachment hearings for Vice President Dick Cheney.

Kucinich’s 35 Articles of Impeachment include: "Article II — Falsely, Systematically, and with Criminal Intent Conflating the Attacks of September 11, 2001, With Misrepresentation of Iraq as a Security Threat as Part of Fraudulent Justification for a War of Aggression; … Article IX — Failing to Provide Troops With Body Armor and Vehicle Armor; … Article XXII — Creating Secret Laws; … Article XXX — Misleading Congress and the American People in an Attempt to Destroy Medicare; … Article XXXII — Misleading Congress and the American People, Systematically Undermining Efforts to Address Global Climate Change."

And so on.

Obama last year expressed his opposition to impeaching Bush and Cheney. "I think you reserve impeachment for grave, grave breaches, and intentional breaches of the president’s authority," he told USA Today "I believe if we began impeachment proceedings we will be engulfed in more of the politics that has made Washington dysfunction. We would once again, rather than attending to the people’s business, be engaged in a tit-for-tat, back-and-forth, non-stop circus."

Obama spokesman Bill Burton says Obama’s opinion on the matter remains the same, notwithstanding Wexler’s support for Obama’s campaign.

- jpt

User Comments

-On the articles of impeachment, Mr. Obama?
-Uhh…Present?

Posted by: Wade | June 10, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

“I think you reserve impeachment for grave, grave breaches, and intentional breaches of the president’s authority,” he told USA Today
Come on guys, these are not grave breaches, these are peanuts, you know, Conflating the Attacks of September 11, Failing to Provide Troops With Body Armor and Vehicle Armor;Creating Secret Laws; Misleading Congress and the American People in an Attempt to Destroy Medicare; Misleading Congress and the American People…

Posted by: Wade | June 10, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

It’s a little late don’t you think.

Posted by: tinky | June 10, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

      “-On the articles of impeachment, Mr. Obama?
      “-Uhh…Present?”
      Wade | Jun 10, 2008 11:09:45 PM
Articles of Impeachment would have to be voted upon by the House of Representatives.  Obama is in the Senate.

Posted by:    Lee C.   ―   U.S.A.    | June 10, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Two years ago would have been the right time don’t you think

Posted by: Bishop | June 10, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

They have all been to busy helping Obama run for President to do any real work.

Posted by: Bishop | June 10, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Yea. I think it’s a little to late. He has less then 8 months left in office. This should have been done 2-3 years ago. It won’t make much of a difference now.

Posted by: Vanessa | June 10, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

The case was made crystal clear in almost 5 hours of in depth documented criminality. Congress “Shall” impeach says that “god-damned piece of paper.
Nancy does not have a table to stand on. After impeachment, to the Hague for war crimes trials, then the nearest oak tree, its really an open and shut case of mind boggling depravity. Overwhelmingly proven by their own words. Beautifully crafted. The wanna be fascists have counted on their puppet media to protect them.
Afte a million innocent Iraqi’s dead, countless women, children, grandparents, slaughtered……torture, Plame outed, US citizens disappering, on and on and on……it is never too late. Those who continue to give lame excuses will be found guilty of aiding and abetting.

Posted by: john ordovensky | June 10, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

I caught a very unusual fish yesterday.
I just couldn’t identify it. I’d never seen one like it before.
When I got it in the boat, it flipped and it flopped and it flipped and it flopped.
I decided to call it a McCAIN.

Posted by: The Big Kahuna | June 10, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Yes, articles of impeachment should have been brought against Bush years ago, but the congress was largely under the control of Republicans in early years, and it’s taken time for Democrats to gain back the advantage. Of course, Democrats were largely swept into office in 2006 based on the nation’s disillusionment with the Iraq war. It seemed that was a prime time to bring impeachment to the forefront, but the Democratic leadership decided it wasn’t going to happen.
Kind of reminds me of George H. W. Bush’s invasion of Kuwait, refraining from going into Iraq to go after Saddam. Here, we had control of the situation for once, but didn’t seal the deal. And just like the war situation, an impeachment can certainly bring a lot of collateral damage. However, I personally believe that the political damage would be worth it to remove George W. Bush from office.
Presuming this resolution doesn’t go anywhere, I sincerely hope he’ll be held to account in some other way after he’s left office.

Posted by: Mike H. | June 10, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Our Beloved Chairman Barrack declared this a non-issue, come on people, move on, let’s get back to attend the people’s business, which is to work on electing him.

Posted by: Wade | June 10, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Mr Obama is using this for his own gain.
Just the way he used everything else.
The timing is perfect. Obama wants the eyes off him from now to the general election.
He wants to continue the process he started when he started campaigning. Hate bush, hate the government, Hate Hillary, Hate McCain, Hate the republicans.
Making it easy to win, the elections.
He is still the guy from Chicago. The Elimantor.
The Obama machine in motion.
Just remember anyone who would stoop as low as obama has to win an election, is the height of corruption.
You want to give him all the power in the country?
Be forwarned, Once Obama is in office, there will be no impeaching him, no matter what he does.
Just Ask Brazzie, she will tell you.
“There will be blood in the streets.”
Just like she said if he wasn’t the nominee.
Obama Americas Hitler…………..

Posted by: seah | June 10, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

political posturing by the Democrats in an election year…they’ve taken over Congress and done what….disappointment all around.

Posted by: rw in ct | June 10, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

LOL at the Obama haters that are complaining about him supporting impeachment when if they had bothered to read the short article they would know that he opposes it.
However, intentionally misleading the country into war probably does meet the standard of “grave, grave breaches, and intentional breaches of the president’s authority”

Posted by: jim | June 11, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

I don’t understand all of this signing on to the Articles or not…
If an impeachment is constitutional, then an impeachment there ought to be. Seriously, our Constitution is so blatantly ignored right now there’s no point to even have it.

Posted by: Jay | June 11, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

“Mr Obama is using this for his own gain.”
He’s not calling for impeachment. Can you read?
As for the rest of your post, seah, I’m proud as hell that I’m not on your side.

Posted by: discolapin | June 11, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

i don’t think it is to late, bush and cheney should be impeached, for history’ sake.
after we impeached bill clinton for what we impeached him for.
and now that we know from the book writers,etc.and from their own admission,
bush should be impeached.
50 years from now when they read about how we went to war, and why and the number of lives lost, and then to find out the bush adm. lied to us to go to war. there should be some record that right was done. and we all should push for this, and show the will of the people won out in the end.
to impeach a president for lying about having sex with an employee, and then not impeach a president that lied about a war that killed people, is morally wrong.
we the american people will want to be on the right side of history,when this is recorded.
the right side is to impeach these guys.
flood your rep. office with calls, and send letters soon to make this happen.
even if he is not impeached. we should for history sake, try to do it.
we are supposed to be a great and just people, to impeach these people is the just thing to do. for history’ sake.

Posted by: andjustice for all | June 11, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

It would take about 6 months for them to complete the impeachment process… about the same time Bush has left in office.
What’s the point? Just a waste of time and money. The Democrats should instead be working on a solution for the economy. They still can’t get anything done. The Reps again blocked another legislation they tried to pass! Taxing oil companies on oil profits.
What’s wrong with the Democratic Party? They nominate the wrong candidate, and they still can’t pass any quality bills… even with majorities in the House and Senate!
Hillary needs to be president!!! NOBAMA!

Posted by: BJ | June 11, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

We relected a man, who lied to the American people, to his second term in office and then put forth the idea of impeachment when he only have eight months in office.
Where were all these 4 years ago.

Posted by: Vic | June 11, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Too little, too late.

Posted by: A | June 11, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

As many have pointed out, this should have (and has) been pursued years ago. Bush abused the presidency from day one by accepting the office without really wanting or caring about the duties of the job. But let’s face it, impeaching Bush gives all those Republicans who sucked at his teat all these years a free pass to distance themselves from him. It’s a fascinating position the neocons have created: they used Bush as their puppet, and now they will publicly sacrifice him while lining up their 2009 think tank jobs. You’re getting fooled yet again, Mr. Bush.

Posted by: Jackson | June 11, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

to show we are a just people,
i don’t think this should be a one party issue, this should be done by ALL right and justice loving people.
no matter what the excuses
the right thing to do is impeach these guys.
six months ago we did not have scott mc. book, we have a lot more solid evidence

Posted by: andjustice for all | June 11, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

“Be forwarned, Once Obama is in office, there will be no impeaching him, no matter what he does.” – Seah
Are you right-wingers still using this tactic? I know it’s fun to accuse your opponent of horrible crimes that just happen to be EXACTLY what your folks have been doing for years!

Posted by: Al | June 11, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Too little, too late. It is tradition for an incoming President to pardon an outgoing President and an impeachment trial could never be concluded before the end of George’s term.

Posted by: Patriot 2008 | June 11, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

bush is not guilty of anything except
trying to protect the united states
from radical islam.

Posted by: robert spiers | June 11, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Remember, planet earth is a high crime district……..THANK YOU MR AND MRS.REPUBLICANS

Posted by: TKR | June 11, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

The crimes against the Constitution were committed by everyone who voted yea to the Patriot Act.

Posted by: Patriot 2008 | June 11, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Just think how many would have lived had the Democrats done this after 2004. It’s window dressing, but I support ANY step in holdling these criminals responsible for the crimes they have committed against our men and women in unifrom, their familes, and the people of Iraq, and Afghanistan. ANd by the way, I’m a Republican. All of you pro war supprt the troops folk, need to look into “depleted uranium, and gulf war syndrome. Our men and women are being killed in greater numbers by our own leaders, than any number of people who were murdered on 911. Don’t be snobbish, do a simple search on what DU actually is, and what it did to troops in the first gulf war, and what it has done to our troops since we invaded in 2003. If you truly care about the troops, you owe it to them to see what they and their loved ones will be facing when they come home. And your government knew, and didn’t bat an eye to the danger. TWICE!!! And if you can’t even manage THAT, ask your representatives WHY veterans and they’re familes are being DENIED disability benefits. If you care, just ASK your representatives in congress; If you can’t do even this much, you have NO RIGHT to say you “support” anything but death of our own people and the people of the middle east region.

Posted by: patriot | June 11, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

It’s most certainly NOT too late to do what is right. The blatant criminality exhibited by this administration must not be allowed to go unpunished. Americans who think otherwise are enabling these crimes and as accomplices are also guilty. The rest of the world can see this clearly- why can’t we?

Posted by: Rrose | June 11, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

For those Conservatives who are flummoxed by Tancredo’s logic, consider this:
Bob Barr claims to be tough on illegal immigration, but he doesn’t support Employer Sanctions, opposes secure I.D. to stop illegals from working,supports more Guest Workers, but doesn’t say anything about deporting current Visa overstayers (or anyone else illegal, for the matter). For my money, Barr is no better than McCain, although I won’t vote for any of the above (except possibly Tancredo as a protest.)

Posted by: Brian | June 11, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

yes, we must impeach,
yes it should have happened long ago
no it is not to late to do the right thing.
if we the american people do not have the stomach to do the right thing and impeach bush, for all of the lives lost and how he has wrecked this country, we need to stop all of the flag waving, and saying the pledge of alligence,
running to big political rally’, saying slogans, YES WE CAN, the straight talk express, and solutions for america.
that is not being patriotic.
we need to do the right thing.
and impeach. and maybe the profiles in courage award will go to the american people, for having the will to right the wrong this bush has caused.
the greatest generation of people were a lot more patriotic and truly engaged than we are.
impeachement of geo bush is the right thing to do. better late than never.

Posted by: jgaw | June 11, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

So Clinton lied about having oral sex, and they try to impeach him, but Bush lies and gets us into a unnecessary war that costs 3000 America lives and he shouldn’t be impeached!!?? What kind of insane thinking is that. Bush deserves to be impeached simply because of his incompetence. Anyone who is that bad at his job should be fired. That’s how it is with every job in this great country of ours.

Posted by: Paul | June 11, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!
Tell that bunch of lies to the UN which wasn’t doing THEIR job.
This guy has TOO much TAX dollars to spend — try protecting our service men and women who are over ther protecting YOUR freedom!

Posted by: Marvin D. Miller | June 11, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

I’m pretty sure Kucinich went through the trouble just to get that all stated on the congressional record – I doubt even he thinks anything will come of it at this point.

Posted by: boozinf | June 11, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Too little too late….. are you people serious?
If there’s hard evidence of the injustices wrought with intent – and we’re talking TRILLIONS of war dollars – 100,000′s of people dead (+4000 US soldiers) it’ll never be too late! Listen to you wimpy-ass folk. Anytime is good enough to right a wrong and passing it by doesn’t make it righter – just more wrong!

Posted by: Misha | June 11, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

There are no statutory limits for war criminals.

Posted by: Karl | June 11, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

While I firmly believe that Bush has committed high crimes and misdemeanors that borderline on treason, while I believe that Bush’s Presidency is destined to become one of the worst in U.S. history, while I believe that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzalez, Libby, Wolfowitz, Feith, Rice and Rove should all be tried for war crimes in the Hague, I can’t see this impeachment getting any traction so it is a moot point to begin with.
It should be Congress’ duty to impeach a criminal administration that makes Nixon look reasonable, yet the Democrats don’t want to risk looking as stupid as the Republicans did when they impeached Clinton. That’s the nature of power, and the sad fact is that there are too many stupid people in America (and the world in general for that matter), like the people on here that think Bush defended us from terror, rather than trade away American power and galvanize radical Islam which is what he actually did.
The reality of politics is grim and Bush will likely either walk or live in exile. He may be hated by almost 80% of the country, and has the highest disapproval rating ever recorded, he still has friends in high places that ignore the will of the American people.
However I commend Kucinich for trying. When they finally do ask questions as to why this nation made such costly and foolish errors, why so many people died while others got rich, why America simply rolled over and let Bush invade a sovereign nation under false pretenses, they will, at the very least see that there were those that stood up for what’s right.

Posted by: Wise1 | June 11, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Oh yeah, let’s all admit that Bush is so smart and clever that he “tricked” all of congress to start the war in Iraq and he ‘tricked’ them into voting for the Patriot act!
Are you people serious? The congressmen and women you elected to their positions have been duped into voting for something they didn’t clearly understand? WOW, you’ve got some really smart folks representing you.

Posted by: Stan | June 11, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Hello – who authorized the President to go to war with Iraq? The congress!They all had the same Intel that Bush had. Why didn’t congress do their due diligence? Why was it essentially a 100% yes vote by congress (Including Hillary) authorizing the President to go to war. So should we impeach all of the congress as well? It sure is easy to blame Bush when the war went bad – but they all have their hands in this cookie jar.
What exactly did Bush lie about? WMDs? Read up on your history ladies and gentleman – the US wasn’t the only country who made that claim. Even France and Germany thought that to be true, they just didn’t agree with the war from the beginning. Remember President Clinton bombed Iraq during that little Lewinski scandal – but we were told that wasn’t related. So fine, it wasn’t related but then why did Clinton bomb Iraq? Because he too believed Saddam had WMDs.
Look – if Bush lied, so did Clinton.
I just can’t believe how people just take a Democrat or Republican viewpoint and justify away their actions. Plenty of blame to go around on this one – but don’t get fooled by petty politics.

Posted by: Logical | June 11, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Bush should not have made it in office the first timethat is if Americans could think. But we did it again,as if to say to the world see… we are really really stupid.
Lets stop the horsing arround and elect Obama for president,someone who can actually think.Or maybe we want to show the world how really really really stupid we are.

Posted by: Lew | June 11, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

I agree with Patriot. McCain has a terrible voting record with respect to Veterans’ and military benefits issues compared to Obama. Tri-Care benefits are now tied to Medicare. When you turn 65 your “free for life medical care” promised at enlistment are still “free” as long as you pay for Medicare Part B. That’s $1,157 a year before you even start with deductibles, copays, etc. Try to find a doctor who will treat you when they lose money every time they see you even at the current (very low) reimbursement. Oh, it’s set to go down another 10+% in another few weeks.
I worry about our young Vets coming back. Instead of honoring their service our government, they break their promises to them! McCain has had plenty of time in Congress to show concern and has not. Didn’t even vote for the recent “expanded” GI Bill that is basically the same that the WWII Vets received. Shame!

Posted by: Terri | June 11, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

I think we should impeach our congressmen and women instead, both parties. The responsibilty for war is clearly laid down by the Constitution as the responsibilty of Congress. For anyone of them to sit there now and say they were lied to or blame the President because they dropped the ball is political BS!!!! Especially when they had the prior experience of Vietnam. Any congress person who feels they were somehow duped by Bush of all people should immediatley resign and apologize to the American people for their immense stupidity, and then ask forgiveness of those who lost loved ones in the war.

Posted by: Richard | June 11, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

If Bush is not held accountable for his abuse of executive power, lying the country into an war unnecessary war, going AWOL during Katrina, rushing, underfunding the 911 investigation, obstructing the 911 investigation, torture, rendition, warrantless wiretaps and outing a covert CIA agent whose husband exposed his lies etc, then our country and what it stands for is finished

Posted by: Al | June 11, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Timing seems to be everything…
Could it be that the DNC and Democrat leaders have been waiting for the correct political moment to introduce the obvious?
Do these same Democrats fear the economy is poised for another “Great Depression” no matter who is elected in November and want to provide a diversion of blame and/or a scapegoat?
Of course, the answer to both questions is a resounding YES! The Democrat members of Congress who are spearheading this “impeachment” should be held accountable as well as George W. Bush.
While I have never liked either of the Bush Presidents or their Republican supporters in Congress, Democrat Jimmy Carter was responsible for the miserable failure during his term that began the 20 year rule of Reagan/Bush/Bush.
Now, after 2 years of a Democrat majority in Congress, we are still in Iraq, the nation’s economy is plunging over the cliff of depression, and the divide between the rich and poor continues to increase as the middle class disappears.
Kick ‘em all out, and let’s start over…

Posted by: Jayhawk | June 11, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Congress has an approval rating of 11% approval lol its lower then George Bush.
I wonder Why. I think alot of people who voted democrat in 2004, thought there was going to be accountability.
They won and Pelosi informed us immediately that impeachment was off the table. Its truly disgusting . George has ruined my country.
Now we have to endure tabloid meetings on baseball drug abuses when our country is infected.

Posted by: Reality | June 11, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

and, Logical, France opposed the war despite the intel because they were up to their eyeballs in oil-for-food money, and didn’t want that gravy train disrupted

Posted by: Joe | June 11, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Yawn. Nobody cares. Trust me.

Posted by: Jo | June 11, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

I am adamently opposed to Obama and would never vote for him, and yet this is the first thing he has said that I agree with.
No one needs to spend time or money on this.

Posted by: Debra | June 11, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

If Bush and Cheney were impeached, wouldn’t Pelosi be the one in charge?

Posted by: Terri | June 11, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

the democrats afraid they cannot win on their own merits-so it is time for some diversion tactics.
we must never forget that it was our own pelosi that took impeachment off the table (first order of business). and the democratic congress that authorized the war. and both obmaniac and clinton that voted for continued funding along with all the other lapdogs. timing is suspect i would say.

Posted by: sonia trevino | June 11, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

… and why isn’t this the headline story?????

Posted by: earthisnotflat | June 11, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Impeachment?…Why is anyone above the law in this great land of ours? This duo should be tried and if found guilty hanged just like any other common criminal! Oh crap!…I can’t say that…my Constitutional bill of rights has been redefined by our acting Patriots! I will now just sit here quietly watching “ZEITGEIST, The Movie” and wait for their goon squad to break down my door and take me to the goologs!

Posted by: Charles | June 11, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Obama was looking great to me till I read his comments in the USA today. I suppose HE has no time to hold accountable the bastards responsible for so much bloodshed and financial ruin but I happen to desire JUSTICE.

Posted by: Karla Elisa | June 11, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

If you’re going to impeach Bush over misleading the public into going into Iraq. You must also impeach every single Senator and Congressman that said Saddam had WMDs.
Bye bye every single Democrat in Washington.

Posted by: p0s3r | June 11, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

A couple of posts referred to the Valerie Plame case as grounds for impeachment. Of all of the bogus claims, that is the most bogus! First of all, Joe Wilson outed his own wife long before anyone heard of Valerie Plame. His biography was published in Who’s Who AND posted on the Middle East Institute website where it mentions his wife as “the former Valerie Plame.” Second of all, the leaker was Richard Armitage, the former United States Deputy Secretary of State.

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Congress is as responsible for the Iraq war as President Bush.
Congress could end our involvement in iraq today simply by denying the funds necessary to continue our involvement. without even the risk of a presidential veto. here we are talking about a democratic majority who when elected campaigned against the war but yet did nothing to bring the war to an end.
and let us not forget that before the war started 18% of us were against the war and on the protest lines getting spit at, arrested, and pelted with insults, spit, and rocks. so for the majority of you now to go anti-war is a lie at best.

Posted by: sonia trevino | June 11, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

my point is it is easy to be against the war after it has been proven to be a colossal failure. we could have sure used some help before the war started. but we were written off as a bunch of radicals still fussing over vietnam.

Posted by: sonia trevino | June 11, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

Has anyone else noticed the similarities in oratory style between Obama and Hitler? Germany was mesmerized too. Big difference was that Hitler actually said he was a socialist.
And who really cares what “I was abducted by a UFO” Kucinich does anyway?Only people like “I invented the internet” Gore. Lets face it…half the population are idiots for ever listening to these twits.

Posted by: Intrepid | June 11, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

Forget impeaching him.
Wait till he gets out of office and bring him up on war crimes.

Posted by: john | June 11, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am

Impeach and imprison!
If only the Democrat-led leadership in Congress had the guts to impeach this criminal president, they would find that not only would they have the support and backing of a majority of the American public, but also the rest of the world, and likely guaranteeing a Democrat win in November for the White House.
The strength of America has always relied on the foundations set forth in its laws and Constitution. To ignore those cherished laws now in the republic’s time of need, is a crime in itself, and indeed possibly a greater one.

Posted by: D. | June 11, 2008, 6:13 am 6:13 am

“The world is a dangerous place. Not because of the people who are evil; but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”
— Albert Einstein

Posted by: rodinman | June 11, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

Wexler is the man!!!

Posted by: NR | June 11, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am

Here are the sissified Democrats doing something they should have done years ago.
Everybody knows that there are no real dividends from initiating such proceedings. The only gains are political – making it seem as Democrats finally doing their job and weakening the image og Republicans as effective when it comes to the war on terror. They are just trying to score points in an election year when they know very well that they voted for the Iraq war, the Patriot Act and the Halliburton contracts. Of course, Obama doesn’t want impeachment because many of his superdelegates and supporters will be exposed as hypocrites. Obama has voted for financing the war consistently and in the campaign he played the anti-war candidate and got away with it because the guilt-ridden liberals in greedy media loved the story of a black candidate (it is a sensational story that sells and allows America to fell good about itself). The right wingers in the media loved it too because they thought Obama will be easier for McCain in battleground states (hint: poor white folks) and also it proved what they were saying all along: that America is not racist.
Bush got selected in 2000 by the Supreme Court and the media and both political parties totaaly supported the misguided and illegal Iraq war. Obama got selected by the DNC and the media in 2008 and I am afraid to even predict what the media and corporate and corrupt political elite are planning for us next.

Posted by: haris bisias | June 11, 2008, 6:20 am 6:20 am

Obama last year expressed his opposition to impeaching Bush and Cheney. “I think you reserve impeachment for grave, grave breaches, and intentional breaches of the president’s authority,”
Obama is his typical gutless self.
He’s just a guilty as Bush for his total lack of oversight and for funding the war after all hs speeches to the contrary.

Posted by: hhkeller | June 11, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am

As a democrat I find this insulting. We’ve known about the lies for years now. And now, years later, during the election, they pull this crap? It’s a gutless move and shameful pandering.
Pelosi and the gang need to get off their ass and quit acting like Republicans! We voted them in to get something accomplished for the country, not to continue the same partisan bickering we had under the GOP.
Cheney and Bush SHOULD have been impeached. But now it’s nothing but a political gesture.
The Dems have done nothing but squabble and point fingers since they got the majority. Both parties seem more concerned with placing blame than turning things around.
I’m voting Obama, McCain has become a GOP stooge, but I’m not buying into this type of political BS. It’s nothing but a watse of time and tax dollars.
WE REALLY NEED A VIABLE THIRD PARTY!

Posted by: David Hussein Alexander | June 11, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am

He’s just a guilty as Bush for his total lack of oversight and for funding the war after all hs speeches to the contrary.
———————–
NO, He didn’t start the war. He didn’t vote for the war. He didn’t authorize the war.
He voted to fund the war after it was started. We have American troops overseas in a WAR. Of course he voted to keep out troops supplied.
I hate this war, but we don’t turn our backs on our own soldiers because of it. They’re doing the job we ask of them. We get rid of the politicians who pushed for it.

Posted by: Big Kahuna | June 11, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

Did the articles of impeachment include outing a certain CIA operative? (Treason) – hanging offense
Why is a certain ex-press secretary in secluded custody and scheduled to appear before a Congressional Commitee next Friday?

Posted by: DAVID NH | June 11, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am

If Bush and Cheney are found guilty, do they get retirement or not?
Do they still get Secret Service till they die, or would they find out how the rest of us get to work?
What does the constitution say about punishment?

Posted by: DAVID NH | June 11, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am

Can’t see this helping Obama’s case with moderates. Or maybe it will? Bush is dreadfully unpopular. Maybe folks won’t even care.

Posted by: matt | June 11, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

It would be Anti-American and Unpatriotice NOT to Impecah Bush & Cheney who sent young men and women to a war based on Lies! This should not even be debated and should be a Given!

Posted by: Angellight | June 11, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

KAra elise Obama has stated he will investigate them for war crimes

Posted by: antoine | June 11, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Kucinich has it right. Bush and Cheney should both be impeached or better yet charged with war crimes and imprisoned. They had a war agenda before they even took office to line their pockets and big business ( Halliburton, oil companies, etc,) with massive profits that have been made from this war. It was not about WMD or democracy for Irag. This country has built it’s economy on being a war machine throughout it’s history. It was founded by a bunch of rich aristocratic men who didn’t want to part with their money to pay taxes to England. They wrote that “all men are created equal” yet Thomas Jefferson wouldn’t even give his slaves freedom when he was on his deathbed. It’s time the people of this country take back what is theirs and get rid of these lying, stealing, fanaticals that are running this country and take care of the working people here.

Posted by: Elaine | June 11, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

the impeachment of these two should be being called for by the dems and reps.
because the american people, forget this party stuff. should be demanding that this happens, for the books.
your great,great,great grandchildren are going to look back to this time and say what a amoral, foolish bunch of people we are,(and this next statement has nothing to do with party aff.,i an an independent) we impeach a man for having sex and lying about it. and we have a man who lied and caused a war, that drained the fund, got and counting number of people killed, caused to exposure to all of the awful sides of people to come out, gitmo, the prison scandal,all of this harm done to our country, and no one held responsible for it? if we fail to impeach these guys for this, we have lost our soul as a country, and really headed the way of rome. i was looking at angela m. with bush, everyone elses economy is holding steady, our’ is slowly going in the tank, because of the two we have in the white house.
and we are about to do it again, we have choses marginal candidates at best, looking at obama and mccain, no one can really let themselves believe these two are not going to make matters worst for this country.
both are a joke.
no one will admit it, but we should have gone with gore in 2000, and we should have gone with clinton in 2008,
on the rep. side they should have had hagel or romney.
our healthcare system is headed for a total collapse. maybe this is what is happening with our govt. also.
because we eat and run off the good ones with silly personal reasons, and keep the incompetents.

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

OBAMA IS WORSE THAN BUSH. DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS STUPID LYING IMPOSTOR.

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

neil1795…the only difference between Obama supporters and Hillary supporter is that we know, in order to win the White HOuse we need to unite under whoever is the nominee. There are still dye hard HRC supporters who would die rather than support Obama. Well, go ahead. I think Hillary will find a VERY cushy job in the Obama admin. She watsn something to fight for and she ‘ll find it. If he looses we all loose, we get McCain…

Posted by: formerhillary | June 11, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Blanc…You’re an idiot!!! What about all the men and women he killed in Iraq?…you get impeached when yo commit crimes against the people of the US, like lying…daAAAA

Posted by: newera | June 11, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

if obama gets in-he is going to be so busy paying back favors to the bigwigs who put him there he will not have the time to get to the american people and their needs-they might has well change the name from the white house to the big white pawn shop house.
and pelosi, is so weak kneeded, she has not done what she said she would do when we put her in there.
she is just like obama WE helped HER make history by making her the first speaker of the house, SHE has not done anything in return for us.
and the same will be with obama, WE will make HIM POTUS, helping HIM make history, and he will not be able to do anything in return for us.
we need to stop with the reasons why not, and excuses. dk has 35 reasons why we should impeach these guys,
lets go forward and do it

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Impeach Bush. IMPEACH PELOSI!

Posted by: this election counts | June 11, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Big…withdrawing our troops in an orderly manner is not abandioning our troops, it is getting them out of arms way. We went into this war trying to help the Iraqs get on their feet and support their own country. They have done nothing short of having elections, which were a fiasco, to fufil their part of the bargain.

Posted by: truthtell | June 11, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

At this point, this is a waste of time. Congress has more important business to attend to on behalf of the American people. If the Dem-controlled Congress wanted to impeach Bush/Cheney, they should have started at least 12-18 months ago. They’re hanging their hats on McClellan’s book, which has absolutely no first-hand knowledge of what transpired. I’m really starting to hate this current crop of democrats; they’re a grandstanding bunch of weak, ineffective politicians.

Posted by: HoosierSue | June 11, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

see that is partly what is wrong with us.
I don’t believe sen. clinton wants or would take a cushy job anywhere, especially not obama white house.
I don’t think sen. clinton has taken on any cushy work in her life.
i and michelle obama do not want sen. clinton or bill anywhere near the obamas.
let them lose on their own.

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Bush will only be in office 6 more months and NOW the Democrats (of which I am no longer one) want to impeach him?!! More Democratic fiddling while Rome burns. Do something about the economy! Do something about health care! Do something about energy independence! Do something about food and product safety!

Posted by: Charlie35 | June 11, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Another case of Obama weakness! His delayed denouncing of Rev. Wright, his 20+ year decision to leave Trinity Church, his willingness to talk to Hamas and Iran etc. His relying on McCain to defend his own middle name. Too soft, too weak and too cowardly. NOT PRESIDENTIAL. They call him “cool”- but he needs his cigarrettes to get through the heat. I think he can’t handle the heat.

Posted by: this election counts | June 11, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

here is something to chew on.
I think the clinton’s are to good for the obamas.
no to obama and clinton anything,
i don’t even want her to campaign for him.
she endorsed him. that was more than enough.
i see he was in a hospital copying what she did ernestly. and i don’t doubt he will be giving one of her speeches soon.
yesterday chris matthews had the gaul to say obama needed to become sen. clinton to win.
i mean can you believe these people?

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

i am black and i don’t think this is fair, after bad mouthing and running down the clintons, all of the tv big-mouths for the dems are now (especially on MSNBC) saying obama will win if bill clinton will go on a tour with obama campaigning, and he will win with the help of the clinton’s.
why should the obama’s and their surrogates and supporter want the clinton’ now.
obama even tried to downplay bills economic years.

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Obam, Pelosi, and Hoyer are as guitly and self serving as Bush. Impeach Pelosi for doing nothing about his crimes for the last 2 years. Obama should shut up since his rhetoric is obviously empty verbal diahrea. Mr. (know it all) funded Bushes war and winked with approval ob the domestic spying and torture. Hoyer needs to switch to being a Republican.

Posted by: hhkeller | June 11, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

andjusticeforall wrote “chris matthews had the gaul to say obama needed to become sen. clinton to win”
I think what he means is that he needs to start putting details to his change and hope rhetorics. Until now, people don’t see any substance on his speeches. He’s latest speech in Virginia is plain crap. Obama stole most Hillary’s plans and policies. He is unable to talk in-depth about any of them even as proven at teh 4 debates he had with Hillary.

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Some of you Bush haters overlook two important items in your quest for impeachment! 1. No new attacks; 2. No Hurricanes have hit US soil since Katrina, Rita & Wilma in 2005. I would say that President Bush should get some credit here!!!
Now as for the Battle of Iraq itself, have any of you actually read the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, passed by Congress (Senate: 77-23; House: 296-133) on October 11, 2002.
WMDs were not the only factor in going into Iraq. The invasion was a continuation of the 1991 Gulf War, which was only in a cease fire based on Saddam Husseins agreement to comply to a number of conditions all of which he failed to comply for 12 years. A few other factors cited in the Joint Resolution include:
Iraq’s “brutal repression of its civilian population;
Iraq’s hostitility towards the US which included firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones (at least one US plane was in Kuwati airspace when Iraq fired a missile at it);
Members of al Qaeda were known to be in Iraq (they did have a training camp there at least 6 months before the invasion);
Iraq’s continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations;
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton) which changed our policy regarding Iraq to one of regime change.
Now as to WMDs, it made NO DIFFERENCE that it turned out that Iraq no longer had WMDs. One of the conditions of the 1991 cease fire was Saddam Hussein had to PROVE that he no longer had WMDs. Saddam Hussein refused to do so, since he wanted his neighbors to continue to believe that he had WMDs.

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

The world is watching, The democrats destroy the country.
Now they will watch the Democrats destroy our world Standing.
Are they truly out to do America in?
Obama started his campaign being anti war. He took it further, being anti Bush and war and government.
In speeches to the American people, he constantly blame bush, blamed the government, blame the war for everything wrong in this country. Started the Hate bush, hate the war, hate the government feeding the peoples minds, with his propaganda and hate. sucking them in and turning a whole nation into hating whom he said, and what he said.
all for political gain.
Obama along with the DNC managed to turn so many people into haters and against their own president and country.
To insure complete control over the country.
When we did win the war, We saved a whole nation. We gave them freedom.
Were the country a danger to the world. Yes. They had weapons of mass distruction. They had biological warfare, and they used it.
We did win the war, our presence in Iraq is needed, and warranted and out of obligation. We freed a people and a country, in the process blew it all to heck. Walking away is Failure, turning our back on people in need. Leaving them in dire straights, failure of our moral obligation.
America does not do that.
It might be the obama way to shirk responsibility and moral obligation, It is not the American way.
Funny how impeachment of Bush comes at a critical moment in the run of the general election. Another ploy and play for a power play another used to buy insurance of a Democratic control of the government.
From the start of obama campaign with the blame bush, blame the war, blame the government. constant in his speeches from day one. Setting the ground work, turning the people against their president, the war, the government. Intensified it with motivational speeches. talking the people into anything.(some of the people)
All for The drive for Super power over the Country and the people.
Sad thing is their plan is working and the people are falling in line like they want.
Obama & his marketing team are amazing. They could sell hell to the devil, sell prison to the mob as a vacation package.
Sad thing is they have no morals, they have no respect for anything or anyone.
They will use and abuse anyone. They will lie about or on anyone. All to get what they want, POWER.
They made fools out of the American People.
They have made America Look like fools in the world.
Yes they did
You want to put someone who knows nothing in as president. One who used and abused you. All so he can obtain power.
You know he is not going to give you wht he promised. All Campaign promies to get you to vote for him. He promised everyone everthing, that is impossible to fulfill.
He is a Dynamic actor and speaker, to get you to do what he wants.
This has been in the making and setting up since 2004.
This has been a an unbelievable election process so far. Nothing we have ever seen. The dirtiest, deceiving, power play in US History.
We are just merely votes to obama, and he will do or say anything for a vote.
You can take the man out of Chicago, but you can not take Chicago out of the man.
I suggest you go out between now and January and enjoy your freedom.
That if obama gets elected, you will have The best days of you life to look back on.

Posted by: seah | June 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

neil,
i know what he meant, and it is shameful
that chris matthews knows that sen. clinton would have been the better, but he ran her down, and now thinks that obama should be more like her. the thing is obama cannot, i heard the speech also. he was not the better.and we are going to suffer for it.
chris matthews is not a patriot, and needs to be fired.

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

andjusticeforall wrote “chris matthews had the gaul to say obama needed to become sen. clinton to win”
I think what he means is that he needs to start putting details to his change and hope rhetorics. Until now, people don’t see any substance on his speeches. He’s latest speech in Virginia is plain crap. Obama stole most Hillary’s plans and policies. He is unable to talk in-depth about any of them even as proven at teh 4 debates he had with Hillary.

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Here we go with the usual BS during an election year. Grandstanding and pandering.
I say IMPEACH OBAMA do it now so we don’t have to do it later during an election year!!

Posted by: HP Boston | June 11, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Am retired–not my first BBQ–
Bush & his gang have the all time record for gigantic lies and miss use of Presidential office powers, tearing up the Constitution , and inept office holders and much more.
“TRACK RECORD” shows his (‘w’) political agendas; forcefully keeping the Arizona border hole open, no ‘exit’ plan for the war, no ecnomical plans to help Americans, no repairs of American (our) “infrastructure” , no clue or plans for anything relating to Global warming , totally cluesless and inept for foreign policy , and as long as it seems to ‘hurt America’ , he is for it–
IMPEACH HIM ? I certainly hope at some time Americans will rise up to be the people of the Constitution ; “WE THE PEOPLE…….” are supposed to HIRE and FIRE those in Washington !
When will we NOT find some excuse not (“oh he will be out of office “some day”) to do things and get our control or our government back ?

Posted by: Dave | June 11, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

james danley,
i am not a bush hater (we all should be-but i am not) I am an america lover more.
if they had been reagan, carter, clinton or bush the first who did this, i would say they need to be impeached also.
see this is what you get when people fall in love with the candidate person, instead of being objective and looking at policies and abilities.
when they do wrong and other call them on it you say it is hate, well these emotions should not play into picking a president.
this is why the dems are now taking the lesser of the candidates instead of the one with the ability.
not bush hater, country lover.

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Hillary 2008, if not, McCain 2008 with a DEM congress with more the 60 DEMs in the Senate.

Posted by: RobY | June 11, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

2. No Hurricanes have hit US soil since Katrina, Rita & Wilma in 2005. I would say that President Bush should get some credit here!!!
—————————James Danley | Jun 11, 2008 9:11:21 AM
———————————–
I LOVE your sarcasm!! You are one hysterically funny repub!

Posted by: HP Boston | June 11, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

roby,
So you expect the Dems in Congress to save you and yet you choose to throw them under the bus??
Interesting!

Posted by: jmc663 | June 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

As a democrat I find this insulting. We’ve known about the lies for years now. And now, years later, during the election, they pull this crap? It’s a gutless move and shameful pandering.
Pelosi and the gang need to get off their ass and quit acting like Republicans! We voted them in to get something accomplished for the country, not to continue the same partisan bickering we had under the GOP.
Cheney and Bush SHOULD have been impeached. But now it’s nothing but a political gesture.
The Dems have done nothing but squabble and point fingers since they got the majority. Both parties seem more concerned with placing blame than turning things around.
I’m voting Obama, McCain has become a GOP stooge, but I’m not buying into this type of political BS. It’s nothing but a watse of time and tax dollars.
—————————
Another Dem that agrees with you!
I’ll NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS vote Republican, but the Dems need to start moving forward instead of placing blame for the past.
Our politicians spend more time worrying about getting their “team” elected than doing their job.
Too bad we just can’t clean house, vote them all out, and start over with folks who want to help our nation.

Posted by: The Big Kahuna | June 11, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

what is the point? why when he is already on his second term and its almost up would we waist time on “impeaching” him?
i find it to be just plain for show..
he has been the same war monger as before the second time we voted him in and we knew he was full of it then …
we knew he had it in for hussain because of his father, we knew he was full of crap about the war when he named about 50 different reasons why we waged war in iraq ! now we want to play victim like we were clueless? are we that easily duped??? the signs have been there dont act like we just seen them for the first time people!!!!

Posted by: melissa | June 11, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

melissa,
I beleive they just want to get it on the record to make it easier for the next Congress to bring charges against all of them when they get out of office.
The report that came out the other day was the clear and convincing evidence that Bush admin. lied.
They had to wait until the 2nd report was released.

Posted by: jmc663 | June 11, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

A couple of posts referred to the Valerie Plame case as grounds for impeachment. Of all of the bogus claims, that is the most bogus! First of all, Joe Wilson outed his own wife long before anyone heard of Valerie Plame. His biography was published in Who’s Who AND posted on the Middle East Institute website where it mentions his wife as “the former Valerie Plame.” Second of all, the leaker was Richard Armitage, the former United States Deputy Secretary of State.
Posted by: James Danley | Jun 11, 2008 2:36:31 AM
___________________________________-
Gee you sure believe all the propaganda out there jimmy…get real!

Posted by: HP Boston | June 11, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

so how does this look on mccain who still wants to wage the war?

Posted by: melissa | June 11, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

McCain ’08, interesting! But the poor already have health care. All they have to do is go to any number of free clinics or in an emergency to any ER. As for wanting to go to college, there are thousands of scholarships and grants that are available for the needy with good grades. All they have to do is study hard in high school, get good grades and then apply to at least two or three dozen scholarships and grants. And as for the top income earners, the top 25% of the nation’s wage earners account for 86% of the total federal income tax revenue.

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

This is not the first time impeachment has been brought up, more like the 7th or 8th time and each time its more of the same, it just keeps getting swatted down and swept under the rug, why do these people seem to think if they continue to ignore the will of the people that the people will continue to elect them into office. And to the Hillary Mafia, enough already she LOST, its over, quit making every news story about her.

Posted by: Get Real | June 11, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Get Real,
SUPERDELEGATES MAY CHANGE THEIR MINDS AND THAT’S FOR REAL. IF OBAMA KEEPS ON COMMITTING STUPID MISTAKES AND UNTIL HE PUT SUBSTANCE TO HIS RHETORICS, HE WILL NEVER BE ELECTABLE AND WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED.

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Wexler is just trying to appease his base in Florida. Why wasn’t he standing up for their votes? He’s a snake.

Posted by: beebop | June 11, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

This is too little too late. There isn’t even time to impeach this lame duck president. It should have been done a long time ago when it was discovered the president was a war criminal and for his blatant disregard and incompetency during the Katrina aftermath. There was no effort to impeach him at that time because there wasn’t enough support in Congress. While Congress primarily works for the lobbyists who pay their salaries, they would never fail to ignore public opinion if it demanded something,and so part of the blame can be placed on the media for its failure to provide honest coverage of this presidency. However, in the final analysis, the failures and crimes of the Bush administration are the fault of the American people who have become a complacent, ignorant, and corrupt citizenry that is reflected in our media and our government. We are a democracy after all. We have the power to change it. Just look: after 38 years of failed conservative rule, the upcoming election still appears too close to call. This is a disgrace. The problems in our once great country are with us and nobody else. Impeach the American voter!

Posted by: David Hughes | June 11, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Neil, you are so right they sure can, and in case you havent noticed ever since she suspended her campaign many of her pledged and superdelegate supporters have went to Obama, funny how exactly what all of her supporters keep asking for they are getting in reverse.

Posted by: Get Real | June 11, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

This is so incredibly foolish. The way our economy is right now, Kucinich and Wexler would have the government waste millions of dollars on impeachment hearings, investigations, etc., when Bush only has 7 months left in office? The sheer stupidity of this is enormous. The constituents of Kucinish and Wexler should vote these bozo’s out immediately. What an incredibly waste of time, money and energy. These men misrepresent what a member of Congress should be doing. It’s hard to believe that the Democrats could get any more dimwitted.

Posted by: Kath | June 11, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

the same thing was done to clinton was it not? over him having an affair on his wife? after his second term and near the end of it too? who started that impeachment?

Posted by: melissa | June 11, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Let me guess, you are one of those that are still saying she has 17 million “supporters”, just because they “voted” for her does not mean they are die hard loyalist supporters, I would venture a guess that those die hard loyalists are about 10,000.

Posted by: Get Real | June 11, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

It doesn’t matter now, it’s too late! Even if they did start the proceedings to Impeach Bush with all the bureaucratic red tape to slow the process down his term will run out anyway.

Posted by: Joe Reader | June 11, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Wexler is a waist of time, he should be impeached!!
Wexler who was against impeaching Clinton who lied under oath, used his position to bully people, threatened people and was accused of rape,
wants to try and impeach a President for following his oath of office in defending this country!!
Vote the Dems out now before it is too late!!
Drill Here!! Drill Now!!

Posted by: spock | June 11, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

It doesn’t matter now, it’s too late! Even if they did start the proceedings to Impeach Bush With all the bureaucratic red tape to slow the process down his term will run out anyway.

Posted by: Joe Reader | June 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Neil what Obama has shown by the last week, his campaign and his words…
and if you listen to what he has actually said…
He has shown he is beyond competent …especially considering he doesn’t know “the game” like the other two.
and the polls and the bookies are showing that (you know 2 to 1 odds for Obama)…
so you are screaming in a room where most people went home already.
those of us still here are just watching in fascination at this point at the few people still screaming.

Posted by: dl | June 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

i dont see it happening..
even if he has stumbled a few times so has hillary and we have all been threw the huge lists of them. what they would have to think is that none of her supporters would be willing to vote mccain, and with race being at least a part of even some of her votes and the thought that some of her votes were republican cross overs i dont think they would be confident enough to do it.. race wouldnt be a factor between hillary and mccain so those people might very well think mccain trashed hillary enough for them to switch and then the republican cross over they know they wont vote for her over mccain …
and the problem with puma and others who refuse to back obama is how many of these people are “true” supporters and how many are not? how many people that voted for hillary would switch over to obama because we both know that not all of them are only about hillary and cant get over it not being her…

Posted by: melissa | June 11, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

dl,
I KNOW MORE THAN YOU DO. I HAVE A LOT OF SOURCES…

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Neil, for once while you are even an inch ahead dont go there, if you really want to start getting into “mysterious deaths” the Clinton legacy has 40+ linked to theirs, including gunshots to the back of the head being ruled as a “suicide”.

Posted by: Get Real | June 11, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

spock
drilling now will help us in …oh…20 years… the money companies will be spending on getting that oil should be on getting us off oil.
the drilling in the ocean may cost as much oil as it does get us oil…especially in the short term…
read the facts.
lets prioritize getting the pattens that all the oil and car companies bought up and the breakthroughs that we are now seeing all over the place forward and to market to get us off oil.
Drilling will not help us NOW…and later, you bet your a## that we better have gotten off oil…or we are going to be one sorry junkie of a country.

Posted by: dl | June 11, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Obama has a lot of gimmicks in his bag of tricks to impress the fools. He has also a lot of traps to catch simpletons. People really want to be taken in, otherwise you can’t explain why they haven’t still noticed that this market-crier is telling only a lot a fairy-tales and tall stories and playing old tricks for gulls and dopes as e.g his talking about economy: only baloney and tommyrot; about economy he doesn’t know anything. He took last year only some private lessons about economy and that’s all. Even his teacher said he was very slow on the uptake. Economy is for hime a book with seven seals…taboo!!You must sometimes marvel at the extraordinary docility and credulity, with which American submit to deceptive and misleading speeches made by sly foxes and carpetbaggers.

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

OBAMA IS A BONEHEAD AND SO ARE THE OBAMA SUPPORTERS ! I HAVE TOLD YOU SO MANY TIMES AND THESE COLLEGE BRATS STILL KEEP ON PRAISING THIS STUPID IDIOT. HE DOESN’T KNOW THE AMERICAN ECONOMY AND MORE SO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY AND FOREIGN POLICY. THE “DUMB”OCRATIC PARTY SHOULD HAVE CHOSEN HILLARY WHO WAS KNOWN TO HAVE THE HIGHEST IQ AMONG THE POLITICIANS. SHE KNOWS WHAT SHE’S SAYING. I HAVE BEEN HEARING SINCE THE 90′S THAT HILLARY WAS BEHIND THE SUCCESSFUL AND STRONGEST ECONOMY WE HAD IN THE 90′S AND I STRONGLY BELIEVE SHE KNOWS THAT SUBJECT BY HEART. GEEEEEEZZZZ. I JUST HOPE THAT THE DEMS WILL CHANGE THEIR MIND IN DENVER.

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

neil said:
HILLARY WHO WAS KNOWN TO HAVE THE HIGHEST IQ
**************
REally? Prove it! Show me the stats that PROVE HRC has the HIGHEST IQ of ALL the candidates.
Also, PROVE that Obama took Econ classes last year. I want the dates and the person who taught the class.

Posted by: jmc663 | June 11, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Neil,
You also stated the other day the Obama and Michelee had 230 points added to their SAT’s, yet never provided the proof.
Your fingers are typing checks that your brain can’t cash. LOL!
Enough of the BS. If you cant PROVE IT don’t POST IT!

Posted by: jmc663 | June 11, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

and Neil mine are… I reference numbers…that anyone can go to sites and check
the numbers of dems voting in primaries to repubs
the number of people voting for Obama compared to everyone who voted for the entire republican party…compared to past ratios in past elections…
common statistics that show all primaries have similar defection numbers (even Billy Boy Clinton) after the primaries (only Bill’s didn’t change as fast as Obama’s because the country wasn’t faced with such a clear choice in dumb policies from McCain)
go look it up…
go to gallup…and Rasmussen and all the rest of the national polls…watch as Obama is still gaining…and this is with all the sore feelings of Clinton supporters still fresh.
once you start really using facts and numbers…then we all will take you seriously.

Posted by: dl | June 11, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THIS BLOG ARE AGAINST OBAMA ONLY A FEW 4 (dl, melissa, getreal, bhrandon) OF YOU ARE DIE HARDS. HILLARY WILL COME BACK.

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Neil
Diehards…lol
we are just the four left to hear the screamers in the empty room that everyone left because…it’s done.
We just stick around to see the real “die hards”…screaming “revolution!” “revolt!”and “war!” in the high school auditorium as no one is really listening.
that’d be you.

Posted by: dl | June 11, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Neil, you are so right they sure can, and in case you havent noticed ever since she suspended her campaign many of her pledged and superdelegate supporters* have went to* Obama, funny how exactly what all of her supporters keep asking for they are getting in reverse.
——————————–
I have went to Obama too.
It feels good to walk with the ONE.
Posted by: Get Real | Jun 11, 2008 9:56:17 AM

Posted by: REMEMBER NOVEMBER | June 11, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

those of us still here are just watching in fascination at this point at the few people still screaming.
Posted by: dl | Jun 11, 2008 10:26:51 AM
—————————————
we hear the sobbing………..

Posted by: REMEMBER NOVEMBER | June 11, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

why don’t we all just stop talking about sen. clinton, she has moved on,
she endorsed him. i don’t understand why the talking heads keep saying what obama needs now is for sen. clinton to campaign with him. if the super d and the msm were so sure obama would be the best, that they picked him, let him go on. i don’t not want sen. clinton to be involved with the obama’ in any way.
they don’t like her and don’t want her around. she should just go back to her day job.
and we should stop talking about sen. clinton. she is out.
we should just all watch obama everyday
and listen to him. that is what his supporters have been saying, if we would just listen to him, and get to know him, and his message.
so i am listening and heaven help us.
but sen. clinton is out and thats it.
i am listening to obama and his supporters and the only sense he or his surrogates make to me is they want sen. clinton with them.
but i hope she does not.
she does not need to help obama.
he can do it on his own.
lets leave sen. clinton out of the conversation from now on, she is out

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Rasmussen Poll
Just checked Rasmussen Poll and Obama has 46% of votes compared to McCain 41% and people are so happy Obama is ahead in the poll.
That is only a 5% margin with a probably 3.5% margin of error.
Considering the unfavorability of the Republican Party, Obama should be leading McCain by 12% margin.
The More Citizens listen to Obama the lower his percentages go.
And strong arming Liberman was not a great move, it exposed Obama’s Chicago tactics.

Posted by: Country Before Party | June 11, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

those of us still here are just watching in fascination at this point at the few people still screaming.
Posted by: dl | Jun 11, 2008 10:26:51
———————————–
I can hear the sobbing……….

Posted by: REMEMBER NOVEMBER | June 11, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Florida voters should get on the phone to this wasted excuse for a Representative and tell him to stop wasting his time and their money on grandstanding and work to do what they sent him there to do – FIGURE OUT THIS FRI66EN MESS of let someone else in there who can..
That goes for the Last 2 comics standing – -time would be better spent going back to do the jobs they are ALEADY BEING PAID FOR and coming out with a REAL BIPARTISAN SOLUTION – -
ONE WHO COMES OUT WITH PLAN WITH MOST SUPPORT – MAY WELL BE THE LAST COMIC STANDING…..

Posted by: ellen | June 11, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

KERRY WAS 14 TO 15 POINTS AHEAD OF BUSH IN GALLUP POLLS BACK IN 2004. GUES WHO STILL WON? PEOPLE ALL OF A SUDDEN CHANGED THEIR MINDS. THAT WILL HAPPEN TOO.

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

andjusticeforall ,
CLINTON IS STILL ALIVE AND KICKING…WAITING FOR TEH RIGHT TIME AND PLACE FOR OBAMA TO TRIP FOR GOOD….

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

remember nov,
how could the selfish sen. clinton help obama anyway?

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

neil,
Still waiting on the PROOF that:
1.Obama took Econ classes last year.
2. Barack and Michelle Obama both had 230 points added to their SAT’s to get into Ivy League schools.
Or do you just prefer to post complete lies and pass them off as truths?

Posted by: jmc663 | June 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Neil1785,
Still waiting….You SAY he is STUPID, prove it, pal. Because the only one who is looking stupid is YOU!

Posted by: jmc663 | June 11, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Or do you just prefer to post complete lies and pass them off as truths?
Posted by: jmc663 | Jun 11, 2008 11:23:43 AM
——————————
Hey it works for me.

Posted by: REMEMBER NOVEMBER | June 11, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

You have to be REALLY stupid to graduate with honors from an Ivy League school!
Posted by: jmc663 | Jun 11, 2008 11:31:59 AM
———————————–
Oh yeah baby and HE the “ONE” did it in just 1! YEAR…………..

Posted by: REMEMBER NOVEMBER | June 11, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

no, just impeach bush for the four thousand dead, gitmo, abu grabe(?)
and making the usa the butt of the world.
impeach bush, jut impeach bush.
we have to start righting the wrongs sometimes, so lets start now with bush.
impeach bush

Posted by: andjusticeforall | June 11, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Americans don’t have the stomach to do the right or hard thing to protect this country… President Bush may suffer ill-reputation for keeping our country safe these past several years, but he chose to put the country ahead of his reputation or the whims/polls of political expediency. The Democrats, and our Congress in general, have much to learn from a man who had a ‘backbone’ in the face of global danger. The sandbox mentality won’t work today–we can’t just stay in our sandbox and expect that those playing with nukes and chemicals won’t enter when they’ve shown their disregard for human life in general. Diplomacy without action is an oxymoron…President Bush used both and kept us safe. I believe this nation and its people could use some manners and respect when discussing the Commander in Chief– whether they agree or not with his policies, he made difficult decisions to safeguard our country with no future political aspirations or motive.

Posted by: Dr. K | June 11, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

remember nov,
how could the selfish sen. clinton help obama anyway?
Posted by: andjusticeforall | Jun 11, 2008 11:20:25 AM
—————————————-
I am so glad you asked.
She could stand beside him and whisper the right answers in his ear, as Lieberman does for McCain.
It is only fair that he gets the same help, he can not claim a senior moment, just his stupidity.
He will need her when he goes to Iraq, she can tell him when to DUCK TOO!

Posted by: REMEMBER NOVEMBER | June 11, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

dl, you wrote: “drilling now will help us in …oh…20 years.” Actually the very moment that the drilling begins (if not sooner — i.e. when Congress approves the drilling) the oil speculators will begin dumping their oil futures and the price of OPEC’s oil will tumble.

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

I believe this nation and its people could use some manners and respect when discussing the Commander in Chief– whether they agree or not with his policies, he made difficult decisions to safeguard our country with no future political aspirations or motive.
Posted by: Dr. K | Jun 11, 2008 12:04:57 PM
———————————
Well you believe wrong.
The man in the WH is totally lame.
The world has looked on in utter amazement at the man who has wrought such harm upon this earth!
Dr, K heal thyself!

Posted by: REMEMBER NOVEMBER | June 11, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

OBAMA IS JUST DIVERTING ATTENTION IN FLORIDA BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE’S LOSING BOTH FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN TO MCCAIN.
LET’S GIVE BUSH SOME CREDIT FOR MAKING OUT COUNTRY SAFE FROM TERRORISTS. OBAMA JUST GAVE US THE IDEA THAT IF HIS DECISION IS WRONG (WHICH IS MOST LIKELY TO HAPPEN IF HE BECOMES TEH PRESIDENT, GOR FORBID), HE WILL NEED TO BE IMPEACHED AS WELL.
HILLARY OR MCCAIN

Posted by: neil1785 | June 11, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Dr. K., amen to that!

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Dr. K,
I’ll drink to that. obama is that desperate to do such move…he should be careful not to bump people from high places just like that or he might end up like JFK … obama is real pathetic….

Posted by: MichaelO'Connell | June 11, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I beg to differ! I am from MI and no one and I mean NO ONE saw the election as fair. Everyone in MI thinks the DNC did the right thing by splitting the votes and giving HRC a slight advantage.
Don’t use my state for your misguided and completely factless platform.
If you didn’t VOTE in the state, then don’t SPEAK for the state.

Posted by: Jeanne from Michigan | June 11, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

== Impeach all of Congress ==
Since the US Congress were all equally aware of the intelligence and supported the decisions of president Bush, let’s begin impeachment of all the members of Congress.

Posted by: N Waff | June 11, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Neil
Don’t you know the fix is in and has been for a long time for Obama. How many Senate races are there only one real candidate. How many unknown first year Senators run for office and win their parties nomination? They money men backing Obama know they are going to get BIG Payoffs once he’s in. He’s going to make Bush/Cheney payoffs look like chump change and Tony Rezko will get his pardon.

Posted by: RobY | June 11, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Seems I remeber 99% of the senate and congress were aware of the same intelligence Bush had, and most of it came from the previous administration.
And when America did strike back at Afganistan, and later when the statue of Sadam came down, all of America was cheering..Now the pot calls the kettle black..Biggest flip-flop in history..

Posted by: Choctaw | June 11, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

N. Waff, you wrote: “…let’s begin impeachment of all the members of Congress.” Every member of the House and 1/3 of the Senate are up for re-election this November. Use your vote!!

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

The impeachment proceedures should have been started as soon as we definitely knew there were no WMDs in Iraq. That war was for the benefit of Cheny’s $40 milliom in stock in Haliburtion and other stocks with Cos. that were given contracts plus oil stocks. So many death, pernament injuries, destruction and dollars spent for an artifical and irrational reason. VERY SAD INDEED.

Posted by: Mary | June 11, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Mary, our going into Iraq was NOT contingent solely on WMDs. In fact, as I mentioned early, it doesn’t matter if there were no WMDs. The UN Security Council issued it final ultimatum in order to get Saddam Hussein to comply with ALL of the conditions of the 1991 cease fire. One of those conditions was for Saddam Hussein to PROVE he no longer had WMDs. He refused! President Bush issued his own ultimatum when the UN Security Council refused to follow through on its threat. When Saddam Hussein still refused to comply with ALL of the conditions, including PROVING that he no longer had WMDs, President Bush followed through on his threat.
If we hadn’t gone into Iraq, we, and all of her neighbors, would still believe that Iraq had WMDs.
Another justification for going into Iraq was to oust Saddam Hussein who was harboring and supporting terrorists. Saddam allowed al Qaeda to have a training camp in northern Iraq. And he paid up to $25,000 to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers.

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

I agree totally with James Danley. That’s exactly how the war in Iraq went down. I remember reading in the papers how Saddaam was paying upwards of $30,000 to the families of the Palistinian suicide bombers to help them rebuild. Mr Ed Bradley on CBS reported on the existance of WMD’s in Iraq prior to the war and later flip flopped accusing the Bush Administration of fabricating evidence. There were also reports of huge convoys of trucks entering Syria from Iraq in the days leading up to the 2nd Gulf War. The news networks didn’t find this worthy of coverage. Could this be how Sadaam got rid of his WMD? We know he had them. He used them against his own people as anyone who reads the headlines of that time can readily confirm!!! I would definitely equate those who deny Saddaam had WMD’s to those who deny the Holocaust. These types of people get their information, it seems, from conspiracy theorists and not from factual news sources. Remember 911…remember how the nation was one.

Posted by: Gordon Francis | June 11, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

I remember reading in the papers how Saddaam was paying upwards of $30,000 to the families of the Palistinian suicide bombers to help them rebuild. Mr Ed Bradley on CBS reported on the existance of WMD’s in Iraq prior to the war and later flip flopped accusing the Bush Administration of fabricating evidence.
Posted by: Gordon Francis | Jun 11, 2008 2:50:17 PM
————————-
Oh my dear GOD! You can not I repeat can not believe any thing you read in the papers. NOT THEN AND NOT NOW! You were Bamboozled and HOODWINKED!!

Posted by: REMEMBER NOVEMBER | June 11, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Remember how Bush destroyed the “nation that was one” By waging war on a country that had absolueltey nothing to do with 911. He lied. His own Press secretary is now admitting to the lies and manipulation he engaged in. Impeached? Too late for that!He should be jailed… with Cheney… and Rumsfeld. He should pay back the $1trillion he used to pay for the war. Rove would have never allowed a Democrat to get away with what bush has. Throw him in Jail, throw away the key.

Posted by: power2people | June 11, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Power2people, and the Bush Administration NEVER said Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. When Tim Russert asked VP Cheney, “Do we have any evidence linking Saddam Hussein or Iraqis to this operation (9/11)?” Cheney immediately said, “No.”

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

REMEMBER NOVEMBER:
Australian Paul McGeough’s article in the Sydney Morning Herald dated March 26, 2002, included the following:
“The $US500,000 doled out in this impoverished community yesterday means that the besieged Iraqi leader now has contributed more than $US10 million to grieving Palestinian families since the new intifada began 18 months ago.”
$10 million in 18 months! Now that is supporting terrorism!

Posted by: James Danley | June 11, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Reply to: Truthtell
Big…withdrawing our troops in an orderly manner is not abandioning our troops, it is getting them out of arms way. We went into this war trying to help the Iraqs get on their feet and support their own country. They have done nothing short of having elections, which were a fiasco, to fufil their part of the bargain.
————–
You are a typical democrat. Never want to give credit where credit is due. Have you had your head in the sand? You need to listen up to the persons returning from Iraq that are telling of the great accompishments that we have help the Iraqi people achieve. Our nation by God is here and was established for a purpose for the past and future. That being to help give all people the God given right to be free and not oppressed. I would venture to say if you had been an Iraqi you would have praised the day american Men came to offer you a better life. No more cutting off limbs. cutting out tongues, raping your family members, killing you family for pleasure, strutting soldiers and leader that hated you and used you for their good. How can you be so stupid to say that that voting is all that has been accomplished in Iraq. The people can run their bussiness with out being beaten and robbed by the hateful goverment . The children can go to school and be with out fear of coming home and finding their mom and dad dead or worse. They now have the freedom to have things like cell phones and such that they were not allowed to have . Couldn’t listen to the radio or television with out it being censored or forbidden. Stop listening to the democrats and get information for your self. Iraq is a better place to live and america can be proud for we have freed a people with the help of the almighty God. Do some research and teach yourself about the Iraq then and the Iraq now. Our president is an honorable man. He has made some mistakes but we all would have in his same position. Can’t please everyone for we all have different ways of looking at things. So he does the best to his ability to to what he thinks is best and right. God Bless this man for that… We are there now on peace keeping and only help if called on by Iraqis. I am sure those times arise for the insurgents are persistant but getting fewer. We need to see this through and stand by them till they are able to go it alone. and they will , It is closer but nothing yet to set a time on for it is a hostile world there with Iran , Syria etc . as neighbors and being supported by Russia. They have tasted freedom and they choose to be free now. Please give credit where credit is due. Our president does not lead all alone. He answers to many. He is a good man and Will have his place in history as a Great Man with a vision to help give freedom to and oppressed nations of innocent people. I say Lead on MR, President for God is you guide.

Posted by: venita morgan | June 11, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

This is addressed to “Remember November”
You commit a grave error on several counts in your remarks. Repeated investigations by UN weapons inspectors, as well as our own military inspectors failed to find any so called “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. Note that those inspections were made well before any allegations of foreign involvement in the removal of anything. Also note that those accusations remain pure speculation.
Furthermore the US knew exactly what weapons Saddam had because we provided them. The US supplied both the mustard gas as well as the helicopters to apply it, (in bold defiance of the Geneva convention).
The list of weapons supplied by the US is available on the net under the US Government site for anyone willing to look it up. Both Reagan and Bush Sr. authorized those grants because at the time Saddam was fighting the Iranian hoards for us in a proxy war.
Further note that Saddam never used such weapons against his “Own People” as the idiots in the press maintain, he used them against the Kurds which were people who came from Turkey and were trying to establish an autonomous nation in the north of Iraq.
Any national leader would have responded in similar fashion to an open invasion of their nation. It seems both the press, as well as readers of their foolishness, are incapable of noting the difference in spelling between “Kurd” and Iraqi”, or comprehending that they are a totally different people.
Lastly, I submit that anything read in the press or seen on television be held as suspect until confirmed. Note that every year in congress there is a bill submitted which simply states that all government propaganda be so labeled, and each year it fails.
We then are shown this and that scene supposedly from a war front and believe it as real. Most of those scenes are total fabrications done in a studio.
Americans today are very gullible people with a pathetic ability to question what they are told. A vast change from the fiercely independent men and women who built and left us the greatest nation on earth.
The question asked in our national anthem is appropriate indeed!

Posted by: HS | June 11, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Why waste our taxpayer money when the damage has already been done. Everyone in America and the world (except those in intense denial) knows that Bush is a liar and a fraud who was led astray by Cheney!! End of an Error (1-20-09) will be here soon! Countdown anyone?
Anne of Green Gables in Texas

Posted by: anne | June 11, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Lets see: Anne you said in your idiotic response:
“Further note that Saddam never used such weapons against his “Own People” as the idiots in the press maintain, he used them against the Kurds which were people who came from Turkey and were trying to establish an autonomous nation in the north of Iraq.
Any national leader would have responded in similar fashion to an open invasion of their nation. It seems both the press, as well as readers of their foolishness, are incapable of noting the difference in spelling between “Kurd” and Iraqi”, or comprehending that they are a totally different people.
By your reasoning should we mustard gas the millions of Mexican Illegal immigrants invading the USA ?? You are completely guilty of the accusations you make.

Posted by: Peace ? | June 11, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

do any of you REMEMBER that not only the US but other major countries said Iraq had WMD’s., or do you all have amnesia. Seems like NO ONE REMEMBERS THOSE DAYS DO THEY. Does anyone remember 9-11???? How horrible of a day that was. How proud I am of our President for keeping us safe, because there have been many ATTACKS that have been STOPPED that we don’t know about and that we don’t need to know about. If Obama gets to be our President, GOD HELP US, because he seems to think (just like the rest of the liberals) that we don’t have any ENEMIES and if we do, we need to appease them and talk to them. Those terrorist are LAUGHING IN OUR FACES everytime a McClellen opens his mouth or anyother lib. They are feeding into the hateful terrorists and hateful Americans that hate this country. GOD HELP OUR USA, because we are going to need it in the next Presidency if Obama takes over and our STOCK MARKET CRASHES. I have yet to hear anything meaningful and truthful come out of his mouth that isn’t going to cost us MANY MANY TAXES on everything and anything that is provided to us. GOD HELP US.

Posted by: Joy | June 11, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

His term is over in 7 months!
By the time he would be impeached and convicted, is there a point?

Posted by: Jon Klement | June 11, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Wexler is an idiot and an embarassment
to South Florida. The sooner this fool shuts up the better. Obama deserves an idiot like him as his cochair. I still remember his rantings during the 2000 recount. I’m disgusted with the Democratic party and will be switching parties this fall.

Posted by: joseph | June 11, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

I hope the Republicians agree to the hearings. It will finally bring into the light all of this information. But I will bet as soon as the Republicans agree to the hearings the Democrats will pull the impeachment off the table. Like what happened in 2006 when they tried to impeach the VP. The Democrats are afraid of the truth reaching the general public. God knows every time someone tries to tell the truth they get shouted down or disrupted.

Posted by: Dave | June 11, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

I think the Iraq war was a setup, and certain parties such as Cheney knew darn good and well what they were going to do, and when they were going to do it, and they arm-twisted Congress into signing off on whatever they wanted. I have my doubts as to what happened on 9/11, I think the whole thing stinks like corruption on a global scale, I think the wisest thing we could do at this point is put troops on boats/planes bound for the United States, and then have down ALL the sordid details, line by line, item by item, on C-SPAN, have Congress do whatever it needs to do to start issuing arrest warrants, freeze defense spending, and generally clean some house on the whole institution there, in a lasting and permanent way.

Posted by: Bert | June 11, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Wow — if Kucinich was so concerned about all this “wrongdoing” — where has he been? What took him so long? Not very efficient for a Congressman! I think it’s all politics, timed for the election and a bunch of the usual deomcratic hogwash!

Posted by: mzsally | June 12, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

I just returned from a second tour in Iraq. You can all say what you want about Bush as I feel that one reson I was there is to give you that right. I do not agree that Bush has been a bad president. Its quit easy to talk but to make the decisions Bush has had to make takes more than talk The congressmen and or others who call for impeachment do this are not only wrong but they arn’t very smart They are only after the votes and power,they really don’t give a damn about the nation. People who elect these people over and over are no different. Go ahead and elect Obama and see what happens. All you liberal womem better get used to Burkas.
I guess you other liberals can all carry sticks and beat em when they get out of line. This makes about as much sense as what your saying.

Posted by: ACE | June 12, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Dave, you hit it right on the nail! The House voted 251-166 to send Rep. Kucinich’s (D-OH) 35 articles of impeachment to the House Judiciary Commitee, which is chaired by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI). This is the same committee in which articles of impeachment against VP Cheney were sent last year.
You are also correct when you wrote: “The Democrats are afraid of the truth reaching the general public.” The Democratic leadership knows that these articles of impeachment are bogus. They don’t want the public to know how they duped the electorate in order to sweep control of both Houses. The Democrats ran on impeachment and being anti-war, and that energized the left wing of the Party. This was especially true in the Senate where there were several extremely close races all going for the Democrats. And considering the current makeup (Dem 49 Rep 49 Ind 2) without an energized left the Republicans would have easily maintained conrol of the Senate.
Impeachment hearings are now dead. Do you honestly believe that the Democrats in the House want to divert attention from their re-election campaigns? And then there is the media coverage. Do you honestly believe that the Democrats want the media spending the next several months covering impeachment hearings and effectively burying Sen. Obama’s message of “hope” and “change?”

Posted by: James Danley | June 12, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

1-mccain is a failed soldier who lost 5 plains and confesed under torture id rather die than confess on something i did not do 2-mccain has been called laking judgment in the Keating Five scandal imagin what he will do as president 3-mccain only economic plan is to continue the bush tax cut and make healthcare like gas on the open market ….the above show cowardnes poor judgment ignorance on economy

Posted by: zius | June 15, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am

iraq because of our invasion is forever LOST the more secure and stronger we make it the worst enemy it will become.. if it was a true ally it would cut ties whith iran recognize israeland suppor the us at least 95% leaving iraq is not surrender its DISENGAGEMENT we can still leave… support our allies to fight anny militant uprising.. iraq and iran use to contain each other but know i think because of what we’ve done we will have to support some ellements in iraq to to face the iranian and get the hell out of their so we could concentrate on afghanistan which is slipping away ….lets face it the us CANT FIGHT TWO WARS SUCSESFULLY AT THE SAME TIME THATS WY I THINCK OBAMA PLAN IS MUCH BETTER FOR AMERICA

Posted by: zius | June 15, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am

Wonder how much pressure Obama will resist before throwing Wexler under the bus???

Posted by: Alan MacDonald | June 18, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

One of the biggest things overlooked in the Iraq debacle is that the US invaded a country run by the minority in the middle east called the Sunii to replace it with Hamaz and Hezbollah courtesy of Palestine and Iran are Shiite. Why oh why would anyone without an ulterior motive bring down Sunii to implement a Shiite terrorist gov’t in Iraq? They had a perfectly fine infrastructure with a leader who is less of a threat than Pakistan’s…
The only answer is STUPIDITY and PROFITEERING. The stupidity of it is the long term effect this greed will cause the US for many years.

Posted by: Bob | June 24, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.