By Jaketapper

Jun 23, 2008 9:35pm

Dobson to Attack Obama Tuesday for Distorting the Bible, Having a “Fruitcake” Interpretation of the Constitution

Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family — who has stayed unusually quiet in this election cycle likely due to his loathing of presumptive GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. — will tomorrow attack Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, on Tuesday for a speech the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee delivered in 2006 to the liberal Christian group Call to Renewal.

abc obama 080623 blog Dobson to Attack Obama Tuesday for Distorting the Bible, Having a Fruitcake Interpretation of the Constitution The AP was given an advance copy of Dobson’s 18-minute radio segment, which has already been taped, and will air Tuesday.

In it, Dobson hammers Obama’s views of religion, and says the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee is trying to govern by the "lowest common denominator of morality," and calls Obama’s views "a fruitcake interpretation of the Constitution."

Obama’s original speech, delivered on June 28, 2006, (you can listen to it HERE) started with a discussion of his 2004 Senate opponent, Alan Keyes, who said that "Jesus Christ would not vote for Barack Obama."

Obama said that he "was urged by some of my liberal supporters not to take this statement seriously, to essentially ignore it….But what they didn’t understand, however, was that I had to take Mr. Keyes seriously, for he claimed to speak for my religion, and my God. He claimed knowledge of certain truths." Moreover, "Keyes’s implicit accusation that I was not a true Christian nagged at me."

The speech delves into Obama’s view of the constructive role religion plays in society, beseeching "work that progressive leaders need to do" on the subject, followed by his views of "what conservative leaders need to do — some truths they need to acknowledge."

That included "the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but the robustness of our religious practice," Obama said, as well as "the increasing diversity of America’s population, the dangers of sectarianism have never been greater. Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers."

"And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?" Obama asked. "Would we go with James Dobson’s, or Al Sharpton’s? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount – a passage that is so radical that it’s doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let’s read our bibles. Folks haven’t been reading their bibles."

Dobson responds, per the AP, that "I think he’s deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology" and charges that Obama "is dragging Biblical understanding through the gutter."

"Am I required in a democracy to conform my efforts in the political arena to his bloody notion of what is right with regard to the lives of tiny babies?" Dobson asks. "What he’s trying to say here is unless everybody agrees, we have no right to fight for what we believe."

In response to Dobson’s comments, Joshua DuBois, national director of religious affairs for the Obama campaign responded in a statement: "Barack Obama is committed to reaching out to people of faith and standing up for American families, and a full reading of his 2006 Call to Renewal speech shows just that. Obama is proud to have the support of millions of Americans of faith and looks forward to working across religious lines to bring our country together."

- jpt

User Comments

It was just a matter of time before the religious right came out.
Ilook at Dobson and his ilk like I do any extrem arm of any religion, dangerous to society.

Posted by: Thinking | June 23, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

I find it ironic that Dobson would use the term fruitcake to describe anything other than his tormented, distorted religious beliefs. Dobson’s got a lot of explaining to do when he reaches those pearly gates……

Posted by: algwriter | June 23, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

I am just thankful that we finally have a voice in the religious community speaking out against Obama. It is times like this that I miss Jerry Falwell to set America straight when it comes to politics.

Posted by: MissingJF | June 23, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

In the grand scheme of things, is Dr. James Dobson even relevent?

Posted by: Ted in Arkansas | June 23, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

They’re getting nervous about Obama’s outreach to evangelicals. This is strategic.

Posted by: ROB | June 23, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

James Dobson used to be a respected child psychologist.He is not a theologian. Fruitcake is much better used to describe his descent into apparent religious madness. Very sad….

Posted by: bskahn | June 23, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

“It is times like this that I miss Jerry Falwell to set America straight when it comes to politics.”
Did I miss something? When did THAT ever happen? LOL

Posted by: JANC | June 23, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

“It is times like this that I miss Jerry Falwell to set America straight when it comes to politics.”
JANC, I think that was sarcasm.
It had to be, right?

Posted by: jrc | June 23, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Dr. James Dobson had it correct when stating “Obama is the lowest common denominator of morality”. One must look at his long term associates: Bill Ayers, the terrorist, Tony Rezko, the criminal, Rev. Wright, the racist, hate mongering pastor, Larry Sinclair, drug user, plus others. Obama is certainly not the straight arrow he wants people to believe that he is. I do not consider Senator Obama Presidential material.

Posted by: Mary | June 23, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Did he mean to say that barack obama was a fruitcake?

Posted by: JULIE | June 23, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

its good this guy is coming out he is exactly the kind of support that will help to ensure McCain loses because it is his radical views that elected super moral idiot we have in the white house now. except for the fact that he sold the American people out to big oil and a silly Iraq policy.

Posted by: Mr.putney | June 23, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

I think that there should be separation of church and state.
Dobson should just keep his mouth shut.
I am Catholic and don’t believe what Dobson says.
Different Christians interpret the Bible differently.
It’s kind of like a Baptist saying that a Cathoic is a fruitcake because Catholics pray to Mother Mary.

Posted by: Sandy | June 23, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

The Republicans must be VERY NERVOUS since Obama is really reaching out to evangelists for Dobson to attack Obama on how he interprets the Bible.
I have news for you Dobson. Different Christians interpret the Bible differently.

Posted by: Twayne | June 23, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

The Bible is the true and infallible word of God. There arent different interpretations. It is what it is.

Posted by: MissingJF | June 23, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Everyone knows that the Bible and Constitution are interchangeable and that Dobson is the foremost authority on both.

Posted by: 1percenter | June 23, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

If one choses to vote for Obama or McCain, it will not be because of the abortion issue.

Posted by: c gingrich | June 23, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

I think we can forgive Obama for any fruitcake interpretations, Dobson has a fruitcake interpretation of all things Christian. Actually, so does Obama for that matter, they are a perfect pair.
=======================================
Obama, don’t waste our time vetting him — there is absolutely nothing there!
=======================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | June 23, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

The fact that Jesus Christ was a card carrying, charitable, giving beyond means, peacemaking, calm and sound Liberal must really anger Republicans.

Posted by: Pablo | June 23, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I’m NOT an Obama supporter, even in the least, but there’s one thing I’ve learned over the years. An extremist is an extremist, and the word fundamentalist is interchangable term extremist.

Posted by: Texas Lil | June 23, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Hey Dobson…since the Old Testament doesn’t matter anymore does that mean the Ten Commandments just went out the window? I know it already did for Republicans but what about the rest of us?

Posted by: Paul Palfey | June 23, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

I agree with Sen. Obama to a point I feel that we need to cross the denominational lines. BUT, the Word of God (the Bible) is suppose to be our standard of belief, and conduct IN ALL AREAS OF LIFE INCLUDING IN OUR VOTING. We need to vote based on our morals not money. Dr. Dobson is right and should be listen to. I complement Dr. Dobson for standing for what is Right. Thank you, Dr. Dobson for using your platform to speak the truth.
Abortion, gay rights… are not ok and should not be indorsed and Sen. Obama has plainly stated that he plans on supporting these groups. Which the Bible clearly condemns such behavior. Christ like ones (Christians) are supposed to
believe and follow whole Bible not just whatever part they decide.

Posted by: Min. Daniel | June 23, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Dobson may be the wrong person to raise this issue — granted — but you really have to think about what Obama said in his speech and decide if you agree with his premise.
Now this is going to be difficult for some who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, as many evangelicals do. But in a pluralistic democracy, we have no choice. Politics depends on our ability to persuade each other of common aims based on a common reality. It involves the compromise, the art of what’s possible. At some fundamental level, religion does not allow for compromise. It’s the art of the impossible. If God has spoken, then followers are expected to live up to God’s edicts, regardless of the consequences. To base one’s life on such uncompromising commitments may be sublime, but to base our policy making on such commitments would be a dangerous thing. And if you doubt that, let me give you an example.
We all know the story of Abraham and Isaac. Abraham is ordered by God to offer up his only son, and without argument, he takes Isaac to the mountaintop, binds him to an altar, and raises his knife, prepared to act as God has commanded.
Of course, in the end God sends down an angel to intercede at the very last minute, and Abraham passes God’s test of devotion.
But it’s fair to say that if any of us leaving this church saw Abraham on a roof of a building raising his knife, we would, at the very least, call the police and expect the Department of Children and Family Services to take Isaac away from Abraham. We would do so because we do not hear what Abraham hears, do not see what Abraham sees, true as those experiences may be. So the best we can do is act in accordance with those things that we all see, and that we all hear, be it common laws or basic reason.”

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 23, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

I won’t judge all of Barack Obama’s religious views because I don’t know all of his religious views but in his statements printed in the article above he is absolutely right. I think fundamentalist James Dobson is “dragging Biblical understanding through the gutter.”

Posted by: Harry Watson | June 23, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Not to side with Obama, because I do support him. I don’t agree with his views on Gay Marriage and Abortion. But as Christians, we have to be aware that our nation is not just a Christian nation. We are to teach others not tyrant them. All are called but not all will come. God gives choice, not man. We have to find commonalities that affect us all for the good of our country. However, I do believe that the moral foundation must remain intact. That being said….May God Bless America.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 23, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

20-somethings with no moral compass at all, those are Obama’s biggest fans. They will even claim they belong to one denomination, just so they can bash another. Ask them if ANYTHING is evil, or wrong, and they can’t answer. Unless it’s something THEY don’t like – like the Police, or anyone who goes to Church, or laws that prohibit them from doing what they want to. THESE are Obama’s biggest fans.

Posted by: s | June 23, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Amen, Pablo, you are right on the mark! May I quote you?
Definition of liberal (:
1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, esp. with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6. of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.

Posted by: Glenna | June 23, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

>Americans know a fake christian when
>they see one.
ROFL!! What in pray tell is a “fake” Christian?! Someone that doesn’t believe in your interpretation of the bible?! OH MY GOD, you better look around because there are “fake” Christians everywhere! This is EXACTLY why I don’t follow organized religion…I believe and talk to God directly. Jesus Christ was the type of person that most Christians today would turn their noses up to. He was an average person that hung out with less than desirable people. Organized religion is full of hyprocrites!!

Posted by: Frank | June 23, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Goodnight Gary. Just………goodnight.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 23, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Obama has endorsed and supported rev. wright for 20 years. Obama should beg forgiveness, and retire to crime-ridden chigago.

Posted by: John W. | June 23, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

sames: However, he will repeal the laws that will recognize gay marriage if they were married in states that allow. I know, he stated that marriage is between a man and a woman and that he is in support of civil unions. I’ve studied Barack John M, John E, Hillary, Mike, and Bill. So I’m not far fetched on the issues that are near and dear to me. Okay. Obama ’08.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 23, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

McCain must be REALLY bad for right-wing nut Dobson to say that he won’t vote for him eventhough he is bashing Obama.
I LOVE the way that the Obama campaign is “turning the other cheek” in his response to Dobson’s bashing of him.
It seems that Obama is a BETTER Christian.

Posted by: maybo | June 23, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Dobson = clown. Him bad-mouthing Obama can only help the Democrat.

Posted by: dem in chicago | June 23, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Dear God, please save us from James Dobson and George Bush, whose “understanding” of the Constitution have ruined our country.

Posted by: lwilson | June 23, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

>BUT, the Word of God (the Bible) is
>suppose to be our standard of belief,
> and conduct IN ALL AREAS OF LIFE
> INCLUDING IN OUR VOTING.
Here’s where I get a little confused. There are a lot of people in this country who believe in God but are not Christians. In addition, within Christianity, there are many denominations that interpret the bible differently. Who is right? Who is wrong? In a country as diverse as ours, you cannot paint the entire country with one brush and one belief…period!
This is the biggest problem I have with religious folks that have no tolerance of others. Jesus had tolerance for exactly the types of people you oppose. Your message seems to be you want to have your cake and eat it too.

Posted by: Frank | June 23, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Rational Voter,
Obama has NEVER said that he will repeal those laws.
Obama has stated several times that he is against Gay marriage but he is for civil unions.
He has said that marriage is between a man and a woman. Obama has said that it is up to the individual states to determine whether that state will accept gay marriage.

Posted by: sames | June 23, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

1) Dobson’s doctorate is in psychology, not theology. So, Barack Obama can claim to be as great an expert in the Word as Dobson.
2) Obama taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago, one of the top universities in America. He obviously knows quite a bit about the constitution.

Posted by: James | June 23, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Although our religious beliefs guide us, there is a reason the founding fathers created a separation of Church and State.

Posted by: MIguy | June 23, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

The bible is already a distortion.

Posted by: Palindromedary | June 23, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

I am not voting for Obama. Because he has No Accomplicments, No Qualifications,No Political Trophies, to PROVE he has any abilities. All he has given the voters is flowery talk and copies of Hillarys solutions, which he has incompleted as his own, & His ideas he has qiven are Flawed! Hw is Worse than Bush & Carter.

Posted by: NoObama | June 23, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Anyone here remember:
Separation of Church and State”?
Our forefathers were really sharp…. and very liberal.
Questions like this would/should never come up in a Political Election unless something like murder, cheating, stealing or war would be involved.

Posted by: questioner | June 23, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

The Obama campaign has a PERFECT answer to Dobson’s bigotry!!

Posted by: tarab | June 23, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

I still see loud Hillary supporters on these sites. But they didn’t put their money where their mouth is. Hillary is begging for donations via email because her merry band of supporters failed to contribute enough money to her campaign. Talk is cheap. It’s amazing how these people neglected their candidate financially, but still won’t stop talking about her!

Posted by: Phil | June 24, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I call this a win for Obama. Being attacked by Dobson is like getting the good housekeeping seal for God fearing people. Dobson reminds me of the John Birch Society wackos. I look forward to hearing his constitutional revelations in the days to come.

Posted by: Brian | June 24, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

he was supposed to be in favor of john Mccain and wanted Americans to vote for mccain so why does he have to lie? Infact they are so proud of Mccain’s fake heroism that they have his naval uniforms still preserved in the Museum.

Posted by: eyes like summer sun | June 24, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

I don’t know who he is and I don’t want to know who he is.

Posted by: Mack | June 24, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Is James Dobson relevant? Is he GOD or something? I am ready to burst into laughter!!!

Posted by: Joe Reed | June 24, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Mary: When others were stoning a women for her sins, Jesus Christ told them. If any of you are not sinners then cast the first stone! Christ was criticised for talking to, and working with people who had been known to be immoral according to the judgements people made in that time. Why do you think you are more HOLY than HE is? Being holier than thou will not get you into the Celestial Kingdom. Judge not that ye be not judged! Read the New Testament, it will enlighten you!

Posted by: Len kay | June 24, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Obama’s trinity church is not a “typical” christian church. I doubt obama understands what it is to be a christian.

Posted by: martha | June 24, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Dobson and Obama, both are a waste of time.

Posted by: Bob in FL | June 24, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I agree, both Obama and Dobson, empty suits that are mentally unbalanced.

Posted by: Charles | June 24, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

“Anyone here remember:
Separation of Church and State”?
Our forefathers were really sharp…. and very liberal.”
The above represent the ongoing mantra of the poorly educated, bible illiterate, civic government illiterates who continually spew their own hot air off the top of their soft thick heads. There is NO SUCH PROVISION in our Constitution. Our founders were wise and educated enough and burned by the British often enough to set up a government which derives its authority from the people with checks and balances allowing for the people to derive their authority from God. I am sick of hearing Americans confusing their own history with the French. And though I often disagree with Dr. Dobson, I fully agree with him here about Obama and his ill advised liberation theology and ‘fruitcake’ Constitution. I’m being charitable with those remarks.

Posted by: Mary McCurry | June 24, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Last time I checked, Dr. Dobson never attended Seminary.

Posted by: Steven | June 24, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Yes, Dobson has a degree in psychology. I do too, and I disagree with him on his take on parenting, relationships, religon and politics.
It is time to confusing religon and politics. We have given too much power and air time to unqualified persons with extreme, divisive views.
Obama is pragmatic and working to unite people of America- not just Baptisit, Catholics or Jewish folks. He is out their for all of us and his history shows he has been dedicated to Americans for a long time. Dobson’s views have seem critical and fatalistic. I hope we can find optimism and solutions to help working class Americans and restore our pride, strength and relationships in the world.

Posted by: Cindi | June 24, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

“Christ was criticised for talking to, and working with people who had been known to be immoral according to the judgements people made in that time.”
But colored women in headscarves can’t be in the same teevee shot with Brother Divine? (In fact, previously-un-”faithful” adult converts to this or that are FREQUENTLY kind of creepy — the Carla Fay syndrome — if you care to look at it that way.)

Posted by: Ma Belle | June 24, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Obama became a “christian” just prior to entering politics. George Bush started going to church just prior to going into politics. Birds of a feather…

Posted by: dalton | June 24, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Who cares about Dobson and Obama? All they do is talk, talk, and talk.

Posted by: Sherry | June 24, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Sames: Okay, let me clarify something for you. I am an Obama supporter. But I’m concerned about the 2nd sentence in the following statements…1)Obama opposes a federal constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman. 2)He opposes the federal Defense of Marriage Act that prevents states from having to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. This is what he said he would repeal. I heard him with my own ears listening to him live, and I just read it again with my own eyes. Do a Google search for it, it’s out there. Now, for an uneducated person, that you claim that I am, I propose that you educate yourself before answering my post armed with partial information. I’m not trying to make him lose any votes. I really like Barack. I just believe in upholding the moral foundation of our country first and foremost. Now, may God Bless America, and goodnight.

Posted by: Oh Yeah | June 24, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

“The above represent the ongoing mantra of the poorly educated, bible illiterate, civic government illiterates who continually spew their own hot air off the top of their soft thick heads. There is NO SUCH PROVISION in our Constitution. ”
Mary,
please do explain your interpretation of the establishment clause. What exactly do you think it is supposed to mean?

Posted by: Brain Hertz | June 24, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

“The above represent the ongoing mantra of the poorly educated, bible illiterate, civic government illiterates who continually spew their own hot air off the top of their soft thick heads. There is NO SUCH PROVISION in our Constitution. ”
Mary,
please do explain your interpretation of the establishment clause. What exactly do you think it is supposed to mean?

Posted by: Brain Hertz | June 24, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Everytime I see Obama on television, I change the channel.

Posted by: George in cincinnati | June 24, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Dobson is just another one of those “fruitcake” Christian cult leaders making millions by fleecing his gullible flock. Just ignore his tripe.

Posted by: wilder5121 | June 24, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Isn’t it ironic that those who cling strongest to vestiges of faith tend to stray furthest down the path of evil?
How many must die in the name of religion before it is shown as what it is, a crutch for weak minded individuals.

Posted by: Derek | June 24, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

there is no provision seperating church and state in any federal document. its not there. the following is what is there: Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an ESTABLISHMENT of religion, or PROHIBITING the FREE EXERCISE THEREOF. thus, noone has the right to keep religeon out of the government or to establish any law preventing it to be freely practiced inside the capitol building or on the steps of the supreme court of the United States of America, or inside of a school building or your local drugstore, or in the commerce and trade and renting houses or in cutting someones hair.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Sames: Okay, let me clarify something for you. I am an Obama supporter. But I’m concerned about the 2nd sentence in the following statements…1)Obama opposes a federal constitutional amendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman. 2)He opposes the federal Defense of Marriage Act that prevents states from having to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. This is what he said he would repeal. I heard him with my own ears listening to him live, and I just read it again with my own eyes. Do a Google search for it, it’s out there. Now, for an uneducated person, that you claim that I am, I propose that you educate yourself before answering my post armed with partial information. I’m not trying to make him lose any votes. I really like Barack. I just believe in upholding the moral foundation of our country first and foremost. Now, may God Bless America, and goodnight.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 24, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

there is no provision seperating church and state in any federal document. its not there. the following is what is there: Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an ESTABLISHMENT of religion, or PROHIBITING the FREE EXERCISE THEREOF. thus, noone has the right to keep religeon out of the government or to establish any law preventing it to be freely practiced inside the capitol building or on the steps of the supreme court of the United States of America, or inside of a school building or your local drugstore, or in the commerce and trade and renting houses or in cutting someones hair.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

“Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an ESTABLISHMENT of religion, or PROHIBITING the FREE EXERCISE THEREOF. thus, noone has the right to keep religeon out of the government …”
And it was all going so well…

Posted by: Brain Hertz | June 24, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

God’s commandment: Love thy neighbor as thyself. Where is Dobson’s interpretation on this? His unChristian attack on anyone who does not practice his brand of hateful religion is absolutetely anti everything that Jesus in HIS preaching of love stood for.

Posted by: shirl | June 24, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

~In the grand scheme of things, is Dr. James Dobson even relevent?~
Posted by: Ted in Arkansas
————————————
nope. never was, never will be.
he is, however, a fruitcake.

Posted by: justsane | June 24, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Let’s see, a book written over centuries, the original manuscripts lost, translated and copied into twenty plus versions with with hundreds of omissions, changes and contradictions…
What’s not to question about such a book? Obviously, only one small group of Christians has all of the answers and the rest of us are illiterate losers.

Posted by: Glenna | June 24, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Who cares about obama’s speech? He has stated America is no longer a “christian” nation. I no longer care what Obama has to say.

Posted by: martha S. | June 24, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Anybody who does read their bible would know that he doesn’t make any sense.
He has surely gone off the deep end.
I think Obama is living in a bubble where he has surrounded himself with only people who agree with anything he says and is not living in reality.
And what is this business about The Defense Department conducting business through the Sermon on the Mount teachings. This country does not apply laws according to religious teachings – only Islamic countries do that.
He needs medication.

Posted by: sarah | June 24, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

“Everytime I see Obama on television, I change the channel.”
Well, then, it looks like His Grace was mistaken in thinking people would stop tuning him off if he just 86′d the head-scarf ladies . . .

Posted by: Ma Belle | June 24, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

God forbid that I ever try to defend Sen. Barack Obama, who I do consider to be a sort of “empty suit politician” – but “Dr.” James Dobson is a total nutjob. The guy needs to chill out and start a vegetable garden or take up fly fishing or something more constructive.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 24, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Phil 12:03:35,
You said Hillary supporters faild to contribute enough money to her campaign and neglected their candidate financially.
Well,,,it’s just too bad most of her supporters are working class people and elderly people.
It’s not that they neglected their candidate financially but they don’t have enough money to make big donations like Obama’s supporters who can donate $2,300/person.
But still Obama need those voters to support him in the GE but not in material.

Posted by: catleya | June 24, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Oh puh-leeze. . .Daddy Dobson? The same right-wing loon who obsessed about Sponge Bob, the scary gays, and taking a bath with your male child to show off the assets? Who appointed him the official spokesmodel for God, anyway?
If there is one thing about the cabal of “religious” Right dominionists, it is their ability to reach into the pockets of innocent Americans and extract coins in exchange for a heavy dose of fear-and-smear fire and brimstone. One still wonders how the media mainstreamed these people and treat their every utterance with the reverence of some sort of American Vatican.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | June 24, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

rationalvoter–in what way would a repeal of the defense on marriage act impact your life? on a day in, day out, meaningful way? unless you, or someone that you love is gay, not one iota…so really, why should it even be an issue?
what you pay for gas, whether or not you can afford health care, have a job, or need to send a member of your family overseas to fight a war…those things and more will impact your day to day life. think about them, and not some silly non-issues when you vote.

Posted by: justsane | June 24, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

AMerica is not only a Christian nation. It was never meant to be only a Christian nation. John Adams said to Thomas Jefferson that in order for the republic to flourish there must be many religions. one would be like a monarchy, again, which they just fought to overthrow. Two would cause constant war (as waswith Catholic France and Prostestant England), no, said John adams, in order for this nation to flourish we must have many religions and many different peoples who all come together for the unifying purpose of living under a rule of common laws.

Posted by: beautifulnightNBoston | June 24, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

“God’s commandment: Love thy neighbor as thyself. Where is Dobson’s interpretation on this?”
Maybe Dobson doesn’t LIVE in the Hyde Park, er, mansion district?

Posted by: Ma Belle | June 24, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Will Obama cancel christian holidays like christmas and easter? Obama is one strange politician. He will loose the support of all christians.

Posted by: Chuck | June 24, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

I think the issue Obama raises goes beyond the Christian/non-Christian divide –
Now this is going to be difficult for some who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, as many evangelicals do. But in a pluralistic democracy, we have no choice. Politics depends on our ability to persuade each other of common aims based on a common reality. It involves the compromise, the art of what’s possible. At some fundamental level, religion does not allow for compromise. It’s the art of the impossible. If God has spoken, then followers are expected to live up to God’s edicts, regardless of the consequences. To base one’s life on such uncompromising commitments may be sublime, but to base our policy making on such commitments would be a dangerous thing.”
Isn’t he saying its dangerous to base any law on religious beliefs? There must be a secular justification for all things?

Posted by: MoreOnTopic | June 24, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Does the Divine One do loaves-and-fishes? Look, it’s food riots:
“Sunday morning, June 23, brought an increasingly common sight to the streets of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Scores of poor and indigent people lined up for free food vouchers outside the Marcia P. Coggs Human Services Center. But on this particular morning, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinal, the crowd grew to such a number so quickly that authorities were called in to ‘restore order’ and cordon off an entire city street to make way.”

Posted by: Ma Belle | June 24, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Obama and Dobson should go to the Trinity church and get some real christian teachings. Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha,

Posted by: John W. in FL | June 24, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

obama seems to be completely lost with no beliefs other than that he believes he needs to say whatever appeals to the most people, this is all a game to him. a “say the right words” game. its not about truth or his own convictions. its about power. its about “never mind what this country was ever about or what our ancesters fought to accomplish in this nation.” he wants change, he has better ideas than thomas jefferson, john adams, benjamin franklin, george washinton and the others who gave us enough reasons to be proud of this country for what it stood for alone. in a day of slavery, they all knew it would provide freedom for all in its good course, but each man would need to work hard for their continued freedom regardless of his color or race. work hard to prove his own human dignity before men and eliminate bias and prejudice by disarming his critics and working together for the good of a united nation. but barrock believes he has better ideas.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

catleya: Pleeeese. I’ve donate to Barack’s campaign because he’s accepted my many tiny donations. $25, $50(3), $30, $100. He accepts even smaller donations. Unfortunately, Hillary went for the big bucks and could not go back for recurring donations. She began asking for the smaller donations too late in the game. As weird as it may sound, I am willing to help regain her millions, however, I need to see that her initial supporters are willing to help out as well. Most have been holding their support for Barack hostage unless he gets Hillary out of debt. Working class worker, it only takes $1.25 per vote (the infamous 18,000,000)to retire her debt. Consider it.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 24, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Oh Yeah:
Yes, I found an article which shows that Obama DID NOT agree with same sex marriage, in fact he referred to the situation with the Sermon on the Mount. The same one he finds radical.
Do a google search for: Obama ties same-sex issues to Sermon on the Mount.
My previous link was removed.

Posted by: Sarah | June 24, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Fruitcake? Dobson is the fruitcake! Obama is quoting the bible. Period. What source does Dobson use for his “fruitcake” defense of his hate-filled dogma? None. Keep talking Dobson. You will finally and forever prove what a bunch of fruitcakes all you far right wing relgious zealots truly are. What would Jesus do, indeed! Vote Republican? Then prove it with some bible verses of your own.

Posted by: The Alchemist | June 24, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

I heard on the news tonight, Obama will give $1,000 per single mother.
I did not hear the details about it.
How he will get all those money?
Maybe he just wants to get women’s votes

Posted by: catleya | June 24, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

bill clinton has “earned” over 120 million dollars in speaking fees since he left office, i really want to feel sorry for hillary having invested 18 million dollars wastefully long after she should have given up on obama being assassinated. but i dont. let hillary take the hit. she gambled, she lost. shes not broke because of it. she will be back richer than the poor people who are helping her get her millions back $20 at a time.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Frankly, I’m still trying to figure out why the AP, and in turn, ABC, thinks anyone cares what James Dobson has to say about anything. The conservative media constantly parades right-wing preachers in front of us as if they are the sole representatives of God – and generally ignore all of the other Christians in the country.
Instead of telling Dobson to focus on his own dam* family, our media panders to the craziest loons and their moneymaking schemes as holy messiahs.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | June 24, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Cat:
How will obama get all the money? It’s vey simple. He taxes them and then he gives them a check later. Everyone will think he being generous, but the money he will give out was always theirs to begin with. Or for those who don’t work, that money will come from other hard working Americans who are being taxed to give $1,000 to someone else. Maybe he’ll use the Peter Pan method. Either way – it’s not generosity.

Posted by: sarah | June 24, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Rational Voter,
I thank you for your kindness.
I actually had never bought a lottery but recently I tried. Who knows I could help to make big donation to her.

Posted by: catleya | June 24, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Am a barack Obama supporter but I feel we should all help Hillary Clinton to pay off those debts. Am using this opportunity to call on all other barack Obama supporter to give anything they can afford. Her husband still remains one of our heroes and has given the Democratic party a lot.

Posted by: eyes like summer sun | June 24, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

~How will obama get all the money? It’s vey simple. He taxes them and then he gives them a check later. Everyone will think he being generous, but the money he will give out was always theirs to begin with. Or for those who don’t work, that money will come from other hard working Americans who are being taxed to give $1,000 to someone else. Maybe he’ll use the Peter Pan method. Either way – it’s not generosity.~
you’re talking about the bush tax “rebates”, right? the one that we’ll get the bill for under the next administration.

Posted by: justsane | June 24, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Sarah,
That’s what all my friends said.
We will get higher taxes.
OMG,,,help us..

Posted by: catleya | June 24, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Dear Sarah. . .thank goodness we have such amazing economic stewards in Republicans, who don’t mind offering public welfare to the wealthiest corporations when they drive themselves into skid row. Why, they don’t mind tax breaks for companies to stay in America, reasoning that we have to pay all those patriots running corporations to invest in America. And, of course, the GOP has no problem blaming the working class. . .why, no company would need taxpayer welfare or bailouts if the little people would live like a Third World population.
I think at this point Americans understand that Republicans love spending money – in Afghanistan, in Iraq, on new military toys. . .but they cannot stand spending a dime on Americans in America.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | June 24, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

kevinbgoode: This one will backfire for sure. Most will identify with Barack on this issue because we are a nation of many, faith and non-faith.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 24, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

There is a growing concern amongst Christians that the nation is becoming hostile to Christianity. For example, you can’t have a nativity scene in a park unless you have a Christmas tree and a Menorah. You can’t have a voluntary prayer before a high school graduation or a football game — even a nondemoninational one. You can’t have a moment of silence every morning in the public school system to reflect on your personal beliefs. You can’t display Christian symbols on public property or on some privately owned commercial properties.
There is a growing tension between the establishment clause and the free exercise clause of the first amendment.
I didn’t think that would ever become an election issue. It’s usually the topic of obscure academic debates. But its the slippery slope that Obama is embarking on — for good or bad.

Posted by: MoreOnTopic | June 24, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

I am voting for Michael Savage.
He belives in borders, language and culture.

Posted by: WS | June 24, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

> merle carson <
Obama has no chance without Hillary's support. If he don't pay, he will loose. Obama is aware that Hillary has been looking into going independent, as Hillary had more votes in the primary. Hillary is still in control and the convention is not until August 26, D-Day.

Posted by: sally | June 24, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Dr. james Dobson should consider his own predecessor the REVERAND Ted Haggard before he cast stones. If his interpretation of the Bible is the only correct one then why didn’t he run for president like Pat Robinson did and didn’t God tell him to run and that he would win.

Posted by: Oneida1 | June 24, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Rational Voter–never assume that another won’t understand your arguments, regardless of their belief system. and you should never assume that you know anything about another persons spiritual beliefs based on their pragmatic understandings of a free and just society.
you do know what they say about the word “assume”?
on that note, i have to work tomorrow–summer school, you know. :)

Posted by: justsane | June 24, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

There is one thing I would like to know about the Obama tax credit. Is it refundable like the earned income tax credit? If not, its disingenuous to promise people a $1000 tax credit when they don’t pay a $1000 in taxes to begin with. Perhaps he should say, if you pay upto $1000 in federal income taxes each year you will no longer pay any taxes. If you pay more than $1000 in federal income taxes each year, you will pay a $1000 less.

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 24, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Obama has never worked a day in his life. He was a lawyer in southside chicago, getting free federal/state/city money for the residents. Sounds like more of the same if he is elected…

Posted by: Bob in NC | June 24, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

justsane: thank goodness for vacations. Go get some rest and have a good night.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 24, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

I am voting for Randy Savage.
He believes in snapping into a slim jim and saying “Ooooo Yeeeah!”

Posted by: Harvey Korman | June 24, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Distorting the bible? The bible is nothing more than a poorly written work of fiction. People have been distorting it and twisting it for years to make it say what ever they want it to say.

Posted by: Pops | June 24, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

sally, what youre saying is that obama is a slave to hillarys influence? i dont think so, she cant go independant, she herself will lose and crash the democrat candidate and lose the support of the democrat party forever. whoever told you she was considering it lied to you.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Dobson will be laughed out of heaven when he dies.
So will Obama, and all the rest of you contemporary popular “Christians” who couldn’t explain the gospel if you were paid to.
If you can’t explain why and how you are saved, don’t waste my time telling me you are a christian.
The Bible makes perfect sense from Genesis to Revelation, but I bet most of you popular “Christians” only know what people have told you about it, because you are too lazy to read it for yourselves.

Posted by: Inner Sanctuary | June 24, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

I don’t think Hillary received much support from the Democratic Party in the primaries. I am sure she will have an opponent in the Democratic primary for her Senate seat — and she will probably be treated the same way as Joe Lieberman. After all, he was forced to run as an Independent because he lost the support of the Democratic Party. Obama supporters still have a tendency to boo her at his events. How much could it really hurt her to run as an Independent?
Say Bob Barr gets 20% of the vote because Republicans don’t like McCain. Say John McCain gets 25% of the vote because he is the Republican nominee. Say Ralph Nader gets his usual 2% of the vote. All she would have to do is get the majority of Democratic votes to win. It would be difficult but it wouldn’t be impossible for her to thread the needle.

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 24, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Pops: The content of the Bible remains the same. It’s people that change. The Bible speaks against immoral living, greed, hatred, and so forth. Those that oppose it typically do so because they’re okay with perpetuating immorality, unlimited greed, an justifying hatred,and etc. The Bible calls us out on our sins. It is the living, breathing, word of God.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 24, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Organized religions are just superstitious cults who have managed to get a political foothold. Most of the people who buy into this junk have a below 100 IQ and are sheep who are easily sheared, sacrificed and/or slaughter just like their cloven hoof real life counterparts. Dobson and the rest of the clowns are just a bunch of Elmer Gantry frauds. But they are effective. How else can you explain GWB in the White House for 8 years (ignoring of course all the voting fraud).

Posted by: mike | June 24, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

disgusted former democrat, hillary wants to come back and run for president again. thats why she wants to be vice president under someone she believes is inferior incapable and naive. if she ran as an idependant, she would break the thin ice she was skating on for the last 2 months. she already angered a lot of establishment democrats. she could not win by splitting the democrat vote, neither could obama, it would serve no purpose other than spite. so many people hate hillary that she cant afford to show how much of a bad loser she is if it isnt too late already. and why should the democrats care whether they get mccain or obama? dont they remember that mccain was in good favor with the democrats in congress all of the time and always stood against the republicans in every situation except for the need to go to war? now we are at war whether obama or mccain becomes president, we are there. probably better to have someone who knows something about it and how bad it feels to be participating in one.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Big deal, the small percentage of people who listen to Dobson most likely weren’t going to vote for Obama anyway; and isn’t Dobson a couple of years behind the times, attacking a 2006 speech now?
Obama’s thoughts of religion and positions on freedom of religion are way more in line with the majority of Americans than Dobson’s. Of course, by the definition of some people posting here I’m just some godless heretic living in a sinful city, so what do I know? ;)

Posted by: sfsinger | June 24, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

I think Hillary would run as an Independent if she felt that she was done in the Democratic Party. It would be her one last chance to be President — and I think she has a slim chance of making that happen. I don’t think she sees the VP slot as a stepping stone to the White House (after all, if Obama loses she won’t be on the next ticket, if Obama wins and is a one term president she gains nothing, and if Obama wins and serves two terms she will be too old to serve.) I think she sees it as a way to keep the Democratic Party from screwing her over again.

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 24, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

oh, sorry, “that woman” refers to monica lewinsky. i meant hillary, not “that woman”

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Do we really want to get down and dirty and talk about cults? What about the
cult of darwinism? What about the cult
of death by privacy (some call it a
choice)? What about the cult of secularism? The separation of Church and state cannot be found in the Constitution for those of you with unusually high IQs. What about the cult of relativism? Take a hard look “progressives”. You may not like what you see.

Posted by: gee | June 24, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

besmartvoteobama, wrong person, the comments are made by the names underneath, not above, i never knew ted haggard, never heard his name before the scandal, i do know james dobson, i read some of his books, he is extremely impressive and insightful. he loves everyone, he hates noone, it sounds like hes defending something dear to him that is under attack. can you understand that? i think most people in these forums dont think he has that right. they are the ones who are hateful and intolerant and ignorant.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

Dobson was a lunatic fifteen years ago and is even more of one now. The only people who are going to listen to him anyway are lunatics as well and would never vote for Obama or McCain, Alan Keyes, or Bob Barr maybe. Also what’s he doing sticking his nose into politics for anyway, thought we just got rid of all those preachers.

Posted by: devilkev | June 24, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

I said it was possible for Hillary to thread the needle if McCain remained unpopular with Republicans. I said she had a slim chance of winning. That’s not a love affair with a candidate — its a recognition that every candidate for President this year is seriously flawed. If you had five candidates instead of two and two spoilers, the dynamic of the election would change. People would not be urged to vote for McCain to keep the Democrats out of office — so Barr would get the number of votes he would get if the Republicans weren’t worried about the Democrats. Nader would pull his usual share. There are more Democrats than Republicans so whoever gained the majority of the Democrats votes would likely be the President. It’s an improbable scenario but not an impossible one.

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 24, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

it should be illegal even here to deliberately falsify quotes in order to mislead the thoughts of people. 1atheist, you are in serious need of the wizard of oz, you need a heart, a brain, and the courage to be honest and let people decide on their own armed with truth, not lies, propoganda, and misquotes.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

You can’t study the establishment clause without also studying the free exercise clause or you will only get half the picture — the jurisprudence is different.

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 24, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

disgusted former democrat, ok, ill hand you that it is a possibility, but wow, id like to know what the odds are that all 5 of them will even run in the end. whatever the odds are, im sure they dont make this conversation worth having. but God bless you and good luck with your cause.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Does God support shifting US combat troops from Iraq to Afghanistan? Does God support keeping noncombat troops in Kuwait in case the situation in Iraq implodes? Does God support sending US troops to Darfur? Does God support using US troops to distribute “humanitarian aid” in the Congo? I don’t know if God does — but I do know that Barack Obama does not plan on bring our troops home. No matter who our next president is, we will still be engaged in at least one ground war.

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 24, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

James Dobson is not an expert in theology. His fundamentalistic interpretations of the Bible is naive. He is a follower of the idea of “the conservative father in the heavens” and not a follower of Christ.

Posted by: Billy Bob Bobson | June 24, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

mike: No, evil has. Evil masquerades as religion and commits atrocities while doing so, however, people of God recognize it. Evil will cause you to believe that your battle is against the flesh. Evil will cause you to believe that there is no God, inspite of massive evidence. No my fellow blogger, it is not religion that commits murder, but evil doers posing as religious people.

Posted by: Rational Voter | June 24, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

I wonder what Dobson thought about his partner Ted Haggard….
Ted Haggard was known for his hate towards gays, Yet he was “sleeping” with a gay prostitute! Hypocrites all of them at “Focus on the Family”!

Posted by: BeSmartVoteObama | June 24, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

do you know how many times i have heard that religion has brought more death and destruction than any other organization known to mankind? that says basically that satanism and christianity and bhuddism, and hinduism, and greek mythology and druidism and every bizzare belief that any man has ever had is basically the same…… except for atheism, which isnt responsible for any deaths. i wonder if joseph stalin believed that as well. you atheists are basically nutcases who are all blinder than bats in a belfry, sorry, but its true, you make things up and quote things that are incredibly stupid and wrong. you quote things that were misquoted by misquoted misquotes and swear by them as though they were fact. tell you what, anyone want to fill me in on the exact amendment to the constitution which seperates the church from the state???? any intelligent atheists out there accept the challenge? (hint) try googling it.

Posted by: merle carson | June 24, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Dobson hates EVERYBODY. Everybody, that is, except the gullible ones who send him money. What a laughable fruitcake. Even worse than Ted Haggard.

Posted by: wilder5121 | June 24, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

The dynamic of free exercise clause litigation is changing. I suspect that Justices Roberts and Alito will make the same kind of pea soup out of Free Exercise litigation that O’Connor made out of Establishment Clause litigation as soon as they get a good test case. From what is going on at the district court level, I think it will soon jump from Native American’s use of peyote to apparent hostility toward Christians.

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 24, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Constitutional history is interesting — did the founding fathers believe that no religious test should be imposed on any public servant or only on federal public servants? Were the states free to have state-sponsored churches? What year did the Supreme Court impose Establishment Clause jurisprudence on the States?

Posted by: DisgustedFormerDemocrat | June 24, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

When Dobson says “I think he’s deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview” he is really describing himself. Like most conservative cristians nothing gets Dobson excited like the thought of imposing his point of view on others. Idiot bible fools who pretend to know the mind of God. What hubris.

Posted by: Bob | June 24, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Not sure what you mean Merle. Telling other people how to live their lives doesn’t pay my mortgage or buy me a nice suit. I’m not making a career out of telling others how to live their life. Dobson’s perfectly entitled to his “traditional view” of anything he likes…. he just doesn’t quite possess the authority to condem others for their “traditions”.

Posted by: Bob | June 24, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” (Matthew 22:21).
Question: Which part did Dobson miss?

Posted by: Black Kelly | June 24, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

This is Dobson’s way of being political without being political I suppose. People have criticized, and I had some misgivings about Obama’s financing choice; but I guess this settles all that. He needs $$ to respond to attacks like this.
More than legislate when/how/if you can get an abortion, which I think is a terrible choice to a bad decision, it is up to parents to make sure that their kids make good choices in their lives. A strong intelligent religious background is the best way.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | June 24, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

What?! Conflicting interpretations of scripture?! How could that possibly be, when Christ founded one Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Chur-…oh, right…the Protestants.

Posted by: kvhausen | June 24, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

I am a pastor in one of the largest mainline Protestant denominations in the U.S. I see nothing wrong with Obama’s comments as quoted in this article. In fact, I applaud them. Leaders who are unable to embrace our nation’s pluralism are out of touch and risk establishing a theocracy. Pluralism is much more of a strength to celebrate rather than a liability to fear. Christians can/should be completely faithful without legislating morality or theology. And to risk repeating an overused cliche, if I need brain surgery, I’m not terribly concerned with what faith my brain surgeon professes, as long as he can do his job well. For an extensive look into Christian fundamentalism’s attempt to control our culture and government, check out the book “Religion Gone Bad” by Mel White. It contains some hyperbole, but also a lot of good information and food for thought.

Posted by: Tripper | June 24, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

If Obama is distorting the Bible then so are and have Pat Robertson, John Hagee, Ron Palsely, and a host of other ministers. It seems when America wants war or to justify gunning down their neighbor over an uncut tree or some silly act, beating their children(“spare the rod/spoil the child”) they quote from the Old Testament, “If thy right eye offends thee, pluck it out!” blah blah blah. Then when America wants to pretend it’s a compassionate, lovin’ nation it quotes from the New Testatment. These self-righteous bible thumpers can’t seem to make up their minds. I gave up on them and organized religion a long time ago. All these so called self righteous preachers are nothing but hypocrites. Any true “God” worth his “godliness” would have struck them all down and done away with them a long time ago.

Posted by: Former_SouthernBaptist_Gurl | June 24, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

national director of religious affairs – there is such a thing? for a presidential candidate?
i’m from Canada and here the government is in charge of stuff like roads hospitals etc.
we might get taxed to death but that is the end of government involvement.
amazing

Posted by: Brent | June 24, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am

I really think that we should continue the separation of church and state.
Different Christians interpret the Bible differently.

Posted by: Asilomar | June 24, 2008, 5:20 am 5:20 am

Dobson and his followers can always vote for Bob Barr…

Posted by: Lambofgoth | June 24, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am

RationalVoter, you also give rational comments. I agree with what you’ve said.

Posted by: sohmak1 | June 24, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Could any serious person take this Dobson person as legitimate? In late 2004, Dobson led a campaign to block the appointment of Arlen Specter to head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, because he thought Specter was fruitcake liberal. Arlen Specter is a Republican, highly-respected by his colleagues in the U.S. Senate such as Sens. Lugar and Warner. Is it a Christian virtue to attack Specter, who is battling cancer, and being the best person he can possibly be?

Posted by: Anton-Scott Goustin | June 24, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Thanks Mr Dobson, you have convinced me that Obama really is the “moral candidate”.
I’ll take the Sermon on the Mount over so called “Christianity” as depiceted by a war loving preacher funded by Eric Prince and Blackwater any day.

Posted by: Tom | June 24, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

Using religion or the Bible as a political tool can only backfire, “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.” Matthew,22:17,18

Posted by: sohmak1 | June 24, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

As far as Hawaii state law, if the poster is in fact correct (which I somewhat doubt)that doesn’t determine citizenship. United States Law determines citizenship, as it does many other things, much as some backwards Republicans wish a few backwards states could dictate all the laws to the rest of us.

Posted by: stan | June 24, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

No form of fundamentalism belongs in government policy whether it’s Christian, Jewish, Islamic or otherwise and I would absolutely include Gaia worshiping environmentalism on that list.

Posted by: CT | June 24, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

dobson—just another republican hit on head when young–looking for a minute in the spotlight—-simply turn him off.

Posted by: rodney | June 24, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

i am a christian –and this guy does not represent me in any way—do not need him or anyone else pushing there will on me—take a powder

Posted by: rodney | June 24, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

It’s an honor to be attacked by Dobson, it means you’re on the right track. This man is about as malicious and religiously extreme as they come. He and ‘Focus on the Family’ (should be called ‘Focus on Dr. James Dobson,’ given his ego) are as close as this country has to a native version of the Taliban.
A win by Sen. Obama would really be a finger in these peoples’ eye, which would be fine with me…

Posted by: greenman | June 24, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

The man supported Bush twice. Enough said!!!

Posted by: Jim | June 24, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am

Tell me who James Dobson is supporting this year and I will vote for the other person. His views are so repugnant to me. I am a Christian, but I can never see myself voting for anyone who Dobson favors. If we did not have anything to unite us behind Senator Obama, this statement by Dobson should be the catalyst.

Posted by: sister marie | June 24, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Why does Dobson get so much press? Who cares what this eccentric bible-thumper says?

Posted by: Surelock Homes | June 24, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Dobson calling someone else a fruitcake is the height of irony.

Posted by: amazed | June 24, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

Leviticus is to the fundamentalists what the Dred Scott decision is to be strict constructionists. They are absolute proof that these doctrines are preposterous views of religion and law.

Posted by: Gnarlene | June 24, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

I am so sick of Barack Obama calling out Jesus on every mistake he made! Obama isn’t perfect, either – far from it!

Posted by: Conrad Mcneal | June 24, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Wasnt Dobson the same guy who accused Spongebob Squarepants of being gay? Seriously. Why are even focusing on this guy?

Posted by: Kim | June 24, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

I believe abortion is murder and abortion is wrong and should be illegal even though I am a Democrat. Abortion is the murder of an unborn child. How could someone murder a child? Please continue the ban on partial birth abortion.

Posted by: Hot Otter | June 24, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

WOW! Dob…….son has spoken! Thank you for bringing true interpretation of the Bible for us dumb lay people! Thank you for showing us lowly sinners, how truly kind, loving, charitable and uplifting Christianity is!
Now I know the truth about Obama… folks, he is one of us!

Posted by: Vinny | June 24, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

I think the statement ” Jesus Christ would not vote for Mr Obama” is true.
Jesus Christ cannot vote for Mr Obama firstly because He is not of this world.
Secondly, Jesus Christ’s Christians should not VOTE for OBAMA since he supports ABORTION and Opposes a Constitutional Ban on Same Sex Marriages.
Mr Obama in HIS CAPACITY as a SENATOR is ready to tell his children: “hey no same sex marriage in my house” yet he is out to support a constitutional freedom for other parents kids to become Gays. What an IRONY for a CHRISTIAN.
Mr Obama, you are no Christian, you speak with your mouth that you are a CHRIST ( a citizen of Jesus Christ’s Republic) yet your ACTIONS SHOW YOU ARE NOT.
YOUR CASE IS IN THE BIBLE: prophesy with words but actions NOT.
Oh God in Heaven, Bless US the CHRISTIANS who wordwise and actionwise trust you in spirit and in Truth, AMEN.

Posted by: CHO RANSOME | June 24, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Now that the race war is behind us… we can enjoy a religious war. Pathetic! Dobson is making a mountain out of a mole hill. Trying to paint Obama as a satan loving baby killer is just not going to work… and its not very Christian of him either.

Posted by: Blake | June 24, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

A Christian and don’t support what Dobson teaches? (sanctity of life, there is right and wrong, families are good, death is bad, violence is bad, love is good, raise our children instead of turning them over to pop culture and Britney Spears . . .)
Hmmm. Can we agree that Christ quoted the old testament? If so then Christians should believe and live the Bible. (of course Christ was the end of the sacrifice and that part of the law) Can we even agree that you have to support and believe what Christ teaches to be a Christian or has it been changed to where you can believe what you want and just say you are a Christian? Sorry, you can’t follow the world and be a Christian. I could call myseld a hot air balloon, but I would fly and Ten thousand people calling a horse a dog won’t make it bark.
best

Posted by: Scott In TN | June 24, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

The tapes just keep coming out. There are a lot more where this one came from

Posted by: geevill | June 24, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Why does the media always refer to an “ATTACK” on Obama?

Posted by: geevill | June 24, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Read Matthew 7:1-5 Mr. Dobson.

Posted by: God | June 24, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Another reason for Obama to come out to his supporters and whine about being attacked again.
He is always the victim.
I don’t totally agree with Dobson, but I do wonder what God thinks about some of the things going on in Obama’s church.

Posted by: riley | June 24, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Obama is a follower of Black Liberation Theology…..
For 20 Years.
Black Liberation Theology HELPED OBAMA FIND GOD.
THE ONLY THING OBAMA BELIEVES IN IS OBAMA AND HIS HYPED UP IMAGE/BRAND.
BTW —Ramadan is coming up in September. Is Obama visiting a Mosque soon or will he wait til the holiest day for the Muslims….Bush visited Mosques…even took his shoes off during a prayer….Is visiting a Mosque part of his Religious Unity Tour?

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | June 24, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

From what I can see – When Obama speaks he brings division – division between races, division with religion, people. They’ll be more division with him, just watch.
This man of unity is a man who chooses to ridicule and make accusations to pave a path for his agenda. He’s a snake.

Posted by: sarah | June 24, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Obama says whatever you want to hear!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 24, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Obama is correct.
Christians tend to treat the Bible as à la carte only choosing which verses they want to adhere to.
Most of the verses against homosexuality is in the Old Testament so Dobson obviously doesn’t believe the crap of the Old Testament/New Testament separation.
Don’t speak about morality. McCain isn’t a bastion morality and neither is Bush. If I had to align myself with either the associates of McCain, Bush or Obama… I’m going with Obama. At least it’s a better class of losers.

Posted by: ThunderMonkey | June 24, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Dobson can’t stand McCain, now he’s critical of Obama, who is the man for? The simple rhetorical point Obama was making in his speech which had to do with making allowances for religious differences in our pluralistic society was completely sound, Dobson only took exception to it in order to draw attention to age old differences between evangelicals and the Democratic party. We’ve had elections where our most urgent priorities, (the economy, Iraq etc.) were submerged in a tide of anti gay marriage and anti abortion rhetoric, and now look where it’s gotten us. I’m no fan of either of those democratic positions, but I’m willing to put them on the back burner to stop the bleeding in the economy, the war, health care and all the more pressing issues.

Posted by: colinalcarz | June 24, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Once again, the literalist interpretation is assumed to be the only correct interpretation of the Bible. It is in fact a distortion. These people, such as Dobson, claim ‘the Bible only,’ but are really slaves to a historical tradition of inconsistant literal interpretation of the Bible. This fundamentalism has dominated evangelicanism for decades. It is a broken vessel. Things are changing. The teachings of Jesus continue to inspire and enrich well beyond the literalists. Evangelicanism itself may well expand beyond the literalists. Just look at the move among many evangelicals to embrace stewardship of the environment related to environmental concerns. Many evangelicals are motivated by faith as they work hard for peace and justice. People who apply the faith in these ways naturally move toward an appreciation and tolerance of others and leave behind the literalistic fundamentalism which has poisoned evangelicanism. Dobson and other fundamentalists are losing control and they are hopping mad about it.

Posted by: Dave | June 24, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Dave: Does Reverend Wright fit into your fundamentalist model?

Posted by: Just Curious | June 24, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

What we are looking at here folks is some scary stuff, indeed. Let’s reflect: This is a member of the same group that helped mastermind the Bush elections in the name of family values without a second thought to how many families would be destroyed in their wake. This is a man who was also a member of a so-called advisory team to the president that has slowly crumbled as the truth about who these people really are has begun to tumble out. This is a man who millions of people turn to regarding matters of family and home and because he is willing to fight (verbally) for all those babies, to them, he is a saint. They will pay him handsomely to speak and keep speaking because they believe in what he is saying. Calling him names isn’t going to make him go away. Blaming his followers won’t either–the pro-life stance will always tug at the heart strings of people everywhere…what we should do is worry a little more that he hasn’t quieted down despite the failure of his team for the past 8 years–people are still listening to him and for that reason, I’m very, very afraid…

Posted by: recovering born again | June 24, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Nobody distorts the bible to fit their straight-jacketed views than “Focus on the Family” or other far far right evangelicals.
I remember on Pat Roberstson saying debit and cash cards were another sign of the apocolypse.
People talk about the seperation of church and state. Many think this was done so that people could worship as they pleased (As long as it was Christian). What seperation of church and state really means to me is the right to live our lives without being told by the church how to do sow. Church should stay out of politics, and politicians should leave there religious beliefs at the door.

Posted by: Sean | June 24, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

This is too delicious. So Dobson is saying that the New Testament is what should guide us, not the Old. I guess that means that gay marriage is cool now, given the fact that it’s only mentioned in the Old Testament. What a chump.

Posted by: SpaceCat | June 24, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

You have to be an idiot to pay any attention whatsoever to James Dobson.

Posted by: david dial | June 24, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Why are people always so against fruitcake…..I personally really like fruitcake. I live in a free country were I can have my fruitcake and enjoy it too! Whether it is Obama or Dobson.
Isn’t it great that we live in a free country….Obama can say what he likes and I don’t have to agree with him….Dobson can say what he likes and I can agree with him if I want to…..or not. I can vote for whoever I wish…..Dobson is not running for President, but, I could write him in if I want to vote for him. No one ( at least not yet) will come looking for me and drag me away if I vote for what I believe in….if I vote for the person I believe in. It would be so great if people in this country could come together on some of these things that bother us and work for the good of all people instead of name calling back and forth…. this country was meant to work that way. I believe we are on the brink of another Civil War….will the Black man please stand up for the innocent ones who are not given human being inalienable rights to LIFE, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Obama, could it be that you were given those freedoms for such a time as this?

Posted by: Jan | June 24, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Dobson thinks he’s the Protestant Pope. It’s so sad what he’s doing to Christianity.

Posted by: Luke Colman | June 24, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Dobson is an extremist within his tradition as Wright is within his tradition (Black Liberation Theology). Both have accumulated power and power can corrupt. Both have made outrageous statements which appeal to the haters among their respective followers. Both have been overtaken by hubris. Christians and Americans in general need to disassociate ourselves from such people.

Posted by: Dave | June 24, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

You have to be kidding me. James Dobson said what? This guy is the laughing stock (and perhaps the biggest fruitcake) of the Universe. If you support him, you probably still think the world is flat, evolution doesn’t exist, and we are NOT in a recession. I agree with algwriter above,VERY VERY DANGEROUS TO SOCIETY. James Dobson has misinterpreted the bible for years to successfully brainwash the masses and line his own pockets with millions.

Posted by: interesting | June 24, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

I find it both interesting and amusing that Biblical literalists pick and choose which portions of the Bible are literal and which are not. In the classical training, I learned that the Bible and many other classical books were written in three to four layers: 1) the literal one, 2) the metaphorical one, 3) the moral one and 4) the anagogical one (ultimate spiritual or mystical sense).
The entire Bible is literal in the historical and sociological context as well as it is metaphorical, moral and mystical.
Obama is quite correct that the Sermon on the Mount is now understood as Jesus’ most powerful teaching of social justice and not as the altruistic fool who gives all of one’s possessions away and eagerly becomes a doormat or scapegoat to society.

Posted by: LydiaG | June 24, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

A couple questions from The National Review:
Where are all of the Hollywood celebrities holding telethons asking for help in restoring Iowa and helping the folks affected by the floods?
Where is all the media asking the tough questions about why the federal government hasn’t solved the problem? Asking where the FEMA trucks (and trailers) are?
Why isn’t the Federal Government relocating Iowa people to free hotels in Chicago?
When will Spike Lee say that the Federal Government blew up the levees that failed in Des Moines?
Where are Sean Penn and the Dixie Chicks?
Where are all the looters stealing high-end tennis shoes and big screen television sets?
When will we hear Governor Chet Culver say that he wants to rebuild a ‘vanilla’ Iowa, because that’s the way God wants it?
Where is the hysterical 24/7 media coverage complete with reports of cannibalism?
Where are the people declaring that George Bush hates white, rural people?
How come in 2 weeks, you will never hear about the Iowa flooding ever again?

Posted by: Aston | June 24, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

SpaceCat wrote – “I guess that means that gay marriage is cool now, given the fact that it’s only mentioned in the Old Testament.”
Not so – homosexuality is condemned in the New Testament, in 1 Corinthians and in 1 Timothy. And Dobson is correct – the New Testament records the events of the fulfillment of the Old Testament. The teachings of the New Testament are what guide us now.

Posted by: byablue | June 24, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Hucksters like Dobson have been peddling their brand of snake oil to the folks down on the farm for centuries. TV, radio, and the Internet just give them a national platform now. There’s a sucker born every minute.

Posted by: DiggyZazz | June 24, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Obama should not fall into this debate with this man. What he should to is point out roman Chapter 14. We are not to judge each other on the basis of our faith and how we practice sich faith. it is a lesson that Dobson has forgotten. then he should end it neatly that we whould all pray for each other to have a better understand of gods teachings.

Posted by: Delvon | June 24, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Chriss. Wrong again on your Constitutional IQ. The separation of church and state is not a reference to the the Constitutional ban on establishing a religion by Congress. The separation mantra is one picked up by liberals from a letter that Jefferson wrote over two hundred years ago and is not a Constitutional point of law except in the midstream media and misguided liberals. Try reading it again.

Posted by: gee | June 24, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Rev. Dobson has forgotten the heart of our faith…love the Lord, and then thy neighbor as thyself. Scripture does not say just love other Christians, nor love those with whom we share the same faith or views. As much as we are able, we are to live in fellowship with others. That’s scripture. Obama is right. Dobson is wrong. Somehow Rev. Dobson has gotten so caught up in politics and his perceived power as a “Christian leader,” that he has strayed from Christ’s message. Love, mercy and respect for others is needed now more than ever. We don’t have to agree. Everyone has a free will to believe or not. All need to learn to be civil and respectful. And…if calling Obama a liberal Dobson means that he is someone who cares for the poor, who has mercy for those sufffering without healthcare, and he is respectful of others of other faiths…I thank God that he is. And, if Dobson truly read his Bible, he would emulate him. By the way…I am a Baptist Minister. Rev. Dobson doesn’t speak for me. The Lord does.

Posted by: Ministerzel | June 24, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Dobson is like Kaiser Sosae. Fear him, for he will eat your soul.

Posted by: Hawanja | June 24, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

The Senator and the Reverend deserve each other. Both are politicians first. That Obama could spend 20 years in a church that spouted such hatred amazes me. Then to keep denying it. And then to finally apologize for it. At least with Dobson, you know what you are going to get. Obama is wishy washy. He is an expert in playing the victim. But then, remember that he is from Chicago. St. Peter must be in hysterics.

Posted by: Linda Mae | June 25, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

Obama is looking at the big Picture. I find nothing wrong in Obama’s speach. All I know that God see the heart and God will Judge Not Dobson. Religion is a personal. Who are we to say who is a Christian and who is not a Christian. Dobson said Obama’s position is confused Religion,the way Dobson attack Obama in my opinion is not fair from a man that said he knows God. God said in the Bible Love and Kindness I will draw you. Meet with Obama and have a conversation with him Donot attack Obama show him where you disagree and Obama will help you see Dobson why he feel or think the way he does.

Posted by: Maxine | June 25, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am

Those who say Barack Obama is heathen or not true Christian and should therefore not become president of America should propose an alternative that fits the description of a true Christian. Are Christians therefore going to abstain from voting because there is nobody who fits the description? Does Macain fulfil every description of Christian? Or in America the only description of a Christian is anyone who opposess gay marriages and abortion, all other things not withstanding? Even as we cast that stone against Obama, we who have answered the higher calling and are believers, do we pass the test of christianity as is? The bible is categorical that all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God; pray tell me one christian who hasn’t. Rather than tear Obama into pieces, let us pray for the dear nation of America. Obama wasn’t there when gays and pro-abortionists started clamouring for their rights. These evils are a product of society and Obama’s support or opposition to it is of little consequence if Americans themselves don’t repent. These things are a product of evil and more blamed on the failure of church rather than failure of state. The church has not provided leadership on these issues. Instead they are torn right in the middle. Ordination of gay clergy is not a decision of state, but squarely rests on the church. The church should turn a torch on itself, repent and trust God for deliverance rather than ad hoc attacks on people who have no effective control of the evils in our society. Even when gay marriages are banned by the state, gay relationships still thrive. Are we just concerned about the legality of the evil or its existence and proliferation?
Church please find better reason not to support Obama. At best this Dobson thing is absurd.

Posted by: master key | June 25, 2008, 5:40 am 5:40 am

I am glad Dobson said something about his context for understanding scripture especially where he says Obama is twisting settled religious doctrine.
I’d prefer that pastors and theologians talk to politicians directly about matters of faith. When faith works through the media’s filters it is usually who is up and who is down. Instead, I think it is better to talk about why the Sermon of the Mount is closer to the the theological basis for Jesus’ time on earth than the old Testament’s warnings of what could absolutely can not be done. When Dobson hits Obama on relativism, then it seems to me that Obama has to speak back to what is most important about being a believer and why it has gotten out of proportion in this time.
It is much more substantive than what the MSM does with it. Well, do Jews support him for his faith and his church? Do the Evangelical youth think he is right on most issues of faith? Well, media what issues of faith are we talking about specifically.

Posted by: Genna | June 25, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Mr. Dobson is clearly the fruitcake. He is yet another example of an over the edge, right wing religious fanatic who can’t help but force his insane religious views and beliefs on others. Jokers like Dobson should be sent to communist China as missionaries.

Posted by: Let's be reasonable | June 26, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

I forgot to mention that by sending Dobson to communist China we would at least get him out of the country. He should take all the other nut cases with him who try and force their brand of religion on others which includes depriving rights to the gay community and not allowing women control over their bodies.

Posted by: Let's be reasonable | June 26, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Where was he when the Bush Administration propogated this facist war against all of ISLAM in the name of Jesus. Christians are known for their love not for who they can threaten and kill in his name. Jesus is a prophet to Islam…so in a sense they are simply unbaptized Christians required by Mohammed to beleive in him. Christians should concentrate on getting them baptised in his name not KILLED.That way the Holy Spirit can give them a new song and preserve their faith without the westernism that they TOTALLY HATE FOR GOOD REASON. At our rate Sodom with stand up with Gommorah and condemn us.
Rev Wright was right…Obama subconsciously knows our only hope is to CHANGE.

Posted by: Leslie Miller | June 26, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am

James, Thank you for standing for the Truth!

Posted by: Errol Peters | June 26, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Jon Stewart said it best, Dobson is “just a hate filled guy who got lucky”.

Posted by: will | June 26, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.