Edwards Has Not Ruled Out V.P. Run
EmailABC News’ Mary Bruce reports: 2004 Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards this morning left open the possibility of a second run for the position. "I’d take anything he [Obama] asked me to think about seriously," Edwards explained in a "This Week" interview with George Stephanopoulos.
The former 2008 presidential candidate was quick to clarify, however, that he is not actively pursuing the job. "But obviously this is something I’ve done and it’s not a job that I’m seeking."
As the veepstakes continue to heat up, Edwards said Obama should be left to make an independent decision. "Senator Obama … has earned the right to make this decision for himself. I think he has enormous choices available to him, really great choices available to him. And I think he’ll go through this process in a thoughtful, orderly way, and he’ll decide who he wants to be his running mate. And that’s exactly how it should be done."
In a separate interview, former Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson offered a more emphatic response on his vice presidential intentions. "It’s presumptuous for a person to turn down things that haven’t been offered to them, and I don’t think will be offered," he said. "It’s not something that I want."
Thompson also joked about his rivalry with Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., on the campaign trail. "John wasn’t that generous with me when I was running against him, you know."
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention 
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I see Edwards is getting to be like O’Bama, Changing his mind. Before he said no about being VP.
Posted by: seah | June 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Oh boy just what we need another lawyer. Ebony and Ivory
Posted by: mich mike | June 15, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I live in Michigan and voted Democrat. The Dems didn’t want my vote then and so they won’t get it in November.
Posted by: mich mike | June 15, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Edwards TWICE said he wouldnt take the job.
I notice the reporter FAILED to mention that part.
The longer this goes on, the more CORRUPT the media gets.
All it does anymore is slants and shapes the news to benefit the candidate they want to win.
Posted by: same old | June 15, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Christopher,
It was a Republican-majority Supreme Court that granted habeus corpus to the Gitmo detainees, it wasn’t Barack Obama. Just to give you a lesson in basic civics, Senators don’t serve on the Supreme Court.
Posted by: ElodieStClair | June 15, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Same old Obama haters here posting rehashed and re-pasted posts making the same old arguments. They will be voting for the same old reinvented McCain come November. Their loss.
Posted by: Jesus | June 15, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Fired up.
yes, the democratic govenor in michiagn moved up the primary.
So we will vote for Mc Cain.
Posted by: same old | June 15, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
I forgot to mention that Obama is the same reinvented Jimmy Carter of the seventies.
Posted by: Jesus | June 15, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Come on guys! lets get McCain in there so we can get another war going..Its Iran this time! We are coming to get you..Don’t play with us. just wait until McCain become president..It would be all about war..who cares about the economy.As long as the man with the experience can get a war going then Americans will be sympathetic and gave him two terms to finish what was started..McCain is going to win in November..when the Republican smear team get through with obama most people are going to vote for McCain. The Republicans are much better at smear and lies than the Democrats.. and that is what win elections in this country..So get ready for McCain..The Republicans are going to swift Wright obama from winning. I would love you to win Mr Obama but the Republicans are going to get you with the lies and smear and most of America would fall for it..As the young people say on the street. Word!
Posted by: Earl | June 15, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
jmc663 voting rights do not end at the michigan and florida border. if the dnc can (half the worth) of your votes this election, they can do the same anywhere else. it was the precedent setting aspect of the dnc decision that should concern the electorate. we sure are off topic eh!
HAPPY FATHER’S DAY TO ALL THE DADS
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY
Posted by: sonia trevino | June 15, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Edwards just realise that Barack will win in a landslide come November and know its a pretty cushy job to have,So now lets hop on the gravy train.
You get your own motorcade and a house of your own , you pretty much get treated like the president.And its a high position in the context of congress.
But Johnny boy dont bring much to the table, he didn’t even WIN his OWN state. he is best suited more for Attorney general or the Supreme Court.
I still say Obama / Gore or his good friend Claire McCaskil.ROBERT WEXLER of Florida would be great too, he brings alot of energy that goes with the Barack theme.
It would be GORE, WEXLER, McCaskill in that order.
But please no military on the ticket like a West clark or Webb.
Although you are a shoe in, They can be the kiss of death…like in the past of former army VP choices.
Posted by: ryan35 | June 15, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Flip Flop, Flip Flop, Flip Flop
Now that Edwards has endorsed Obama, the more he is beginning to sound like him.
I seem to remember several articles being released a couple of weeks ago regarding Edwards having said that he was NOT interested in being Obama’s running mate.
The more things change, the more they remain the same……………….
Posted by: Lee | June 15, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
sonia: it looks like you’ve found the others to join your idi*t convention. kudos, i should have never doubted it.
Posted by: 1percenter | June 15, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
I’LL FOLLOW THE AUDIO FROM jeopardy AND SAY :
At this point i’ll take the marxist over the neo-con warmonger who has set out economy into a recession for 100 dollar ….ALEX.
Posted by: cyberhack | June 15, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
That would be fitting, Edwards is the white version of Obama, all in the rethoric of a lawyer, without any actions behind them, that went beyond orchestration in any way. The only contrast between those two would be the color of their skin, which is to say that there would be no contrast at all. Picking Edwards who was the VP for Kerry, would be playing it safe. So much for “change.” The only change coming is the packaging, the polices will remain UNchanged.
Posted by: patriot | June 15, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
i am my party my party is not me. my party does not define who i am or who i vote for.
i do not have to toe the party line. fat cats, party insiders, and politicians do, if they want to get re-elected. that includes my candidate of choice, in this case hillary. that does not mean that i follow her every directive, or endorsement. i am impressed and grateful that obama brought in so many new, and young voters. for that i applaud him, and his campaign. i do not detest any candidate. nor do i engage in vile name calling etc. in this wonderful country of ours i have the right to select the candidate that best meets my criteria as a tax paying employer. we are not selecting a ‘savior’ just another human being that is all. i really do not get all the hate that this election has inspired. if this is CHANGE i want nothing to do with it,
Posted by: sonia trevino | June 15, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Obama will select a woman for VP in hopes that Clinton supporters will kiss and make up.
Posted by: Tera Dactl | June 15, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Obama has introduced and passed precisely two bills since joining the Senate. One was to send some money to Africa and the other was to name a post office. Add to this his 129 votes of ‘present’ in the Illinois legislature and you come up with one thing. A fraud! Pure and simple.
Posted by: A | June 15, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
with obama and edwards, this country will get rid of the snakes in this country, like St. Patrick did in Irland
Posted by: tony saccco | June 15, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
EEEEEKKKKK. I like John Edwards, but he did NADA, I mean NADA for Kerry last time, That would be in the words of Obama himself “a bonehead mistake”.
Posted by: A reader in Georgia | June 15, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Obama is a total liar. His whole campaign has been propped up by the corrupt liberal media.
No media -no nomination.
He cant control the media in the general election. He will lose.
Posted by: snell | June 15, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Obama — full of sound and fury, signifying nothing! Hope without substance, opinions that change daily.
An empty suit kept upright only by an enormous amount of hot air.
Posted by: A | June 15, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
‘Obama — full of sound and fury, signifying nothing! Hope without substance, opinions that change daily.
An empty suit kept upright only by an enormous amount of hot air.
Posted by: A | Jun 15, 2008 4:10:17 PM”
This bears repeating!
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY!!!
Posted by: questioner | June 15, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
HAPPY FATHER’S DAY to all the dad’s. a special wish especially to all the dad’s who have son’s or daughter’s serving in iraq and elsewhere and unable to celebrate this day with your children.
to all the dad’s serving in iraq happy father’s day. and rest assured that your children are safe in america, in large part because of people like you who throughout our history have been willing to put their lives on the line in service of this country. thank you, you are not forgotten.
Posted by: sonia trevino | June 15, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Don’t blame me. I voted Kucinich!
Posted by: Marie | June 15, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Just like in summer people wear FLIP FLOP so J Edwards.
Posted by: catleya | June 15, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
to ElodieStClair
Senator Obama agreed with the courts rule, McCain did not.
Posted by: The Unshrub | June 15, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
quote…Same old Obama haters here posting rehashed and re-pasted posts making the same old arguments. They will be voting for the same old reinvented McCain come November. Their loss……
I keep seeing this silly statement. Either we ALL win or we ALL lose. If whoever is elected turns out to be a good president, we ALL win. If he turns out to be a bad one, we ALL lose.
Posted by: Charlie35 | June 15, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
I just want to see the Obama haters talk up their man McCain rather than waste our time on nonsensical hate-based attacks on Obama. McCain must have something positive going for hi, and he must have some firm political positions that McCain lovers would like to brag about? Something other than being a POW?
Posted by: Jesus | June 15, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Here is something issue-based that I have a problem with:
McCain commented that it was “not too important” when our troops come home from Iraq.
I couldn’t disagree more. I agree with Obama, we need to get out of Iraq as soon as possible.
Posted by: Jesus | June 15, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Re: “Either we all win or we all lose.”
Large numbers of folks who voted for Bush in 2000 regretted that vote, and many from 2004 have joined that group.
the question is whether you want to vote for McCain and regret that vote for the next four years, or vote for Obama. Then, should idiocy prevail, you can at least say you backed the RIGHT horse!!!!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: jackt51 | June 15, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
To all of you complaining about the DNC halving your votes in MI and FL so you are going to vote Repub. You do realize that the Republicans did the same thing for the same reason. So what point would that prove? Additionally are you willing to allow this country to slide further into the crapper for your own childish revenge? Maybe you should punish your locally elected officials for allowing the primaries in your state to be moved in violation of BOTH parties rules.
Posted by: andnel | June 15, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
BLAH BLAH BLAH – Obama/Clinton or I am voting McCain
Posted by: Chipo1965 | June 15, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
My wife and I were Edwards supporters but he dropped out before we could vote for him. When he stomped on Hillary’s landslide in WV by coming out for Obama the next day, he lost a lot of our good will.
The people in WV were exactly the people he geared hisi campaign toward. He wanted their voices to be heard. They spoke and then he did his best to squelch their message. Not too cool.
Posted by: the why not octet | June 15, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
he couldn’t carry his home state when he ran with john kerry, why would obama want him? hmmmmm…..come to think of it i hope obama picks him
Posted by: jim | June 15, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Clinton would be political suicide for Obama. Unfortunatly the United States will not vote for a black man and a woman on the same ticket. We haven’t moved as much forward as we’d like to believe. I think John Edwards would be a great VP!
Posted by: sg | June 15, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
I like Edwards he has passion and his message seem real to me. I support OBAMA and whoever he chooses for the VP slot. Edwards would be a good one I believe. Vote for OBAMA 2008.
Posted by: Lou | June 15, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Look for a press release from the DNC in the next few days. They’re changing the party mascot to a fish. With all the flip-flopping, this actually makes sense. Of course, come Nov…it’ll be a dead fish. Stinky, too.
Posted by: FishMonger | June 15, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
C’mon, none of you can defend McCain, or his positions, despite your threats to vote for him?
Posted by: Jillian | June 15, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
You mean defending the absence of McCain declaring himself a party messiah and Washington outsider? Or his centrist attitudes?
Posted by: FishMonger | June 15, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
People are so angry so all they do is complain. Edwards flip flops – so what? Obama this, Obama that – so what? What have any of YOU done to make things better? Try running for office so that the peanut gallery can moan and groan about nonsense just to feel important because no one else will listen to you. But no, you’ll do nothing, just like you’ve done every day of your lives. Just sit back and wait for someone to rescue you – and when they do arrive, you’ll just find something wrong with them.
Posted by: Fed up | June 15, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
I’m just asking for disgruntled life-long democrats to tell me which of McCain’s positions they support that will make them want to vote for him for president. Pretty simple really. And see if you can answer the question without invoking Obama’s or Hillary’s name please.
Posted by: Jillian | June 15, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Speaking for myself only – I’ve never said I’d vote McCain. I have said I won’t vote Obama though. I plan to sit out the GE for the first time in my life. I’d prefer that only the true supporters cast a vote for one of these candidates. Let’s see who appeals to more people on the issues…instead of who has more people voting against them.
If I was to support McCain, it would be for his record of reaching across the aisle. Everyone knows that a pol is a pol is a pol. They say what people want to hear during the election. But people who get things done put their heads down and work with the rest of the pols – regardless of their affiliation. McCain has done that sufficently that I believe he would listen to other positions as POTUS. Further, he’d be jockeying against a democratic congress. If they do their job, they could pressure him on anything coming from the right.
Here’s the problem with the dems this year. They let the media smear a strong contender and disenfranchised voters with their games. 2004 they took Kerry – and I held my nose as I pulled that lever. What was I gonna do – clamor for Dean? Please. Now they want me to pull the lever for Obama, when I had a contender I respect and supported. It’s all a big club to them – they can do as they please. They’re gonna learn that the rolls are shrinking as a result of their shenanigans. Even if Obama wins, it’ll be a Pyrrhic victory.
Posted by: FishMonger | June 15, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
It’s not that big a deal, FishMonger. No need to take the primary loss of your candidate so seriously. You have to move on and vote the issues that are most fundamentally important to you and your family. This should be easy for most democrats. this should be about the issues not personalities, emotions, anger, etc. I would have gladly voted for Hillary, if she had won the nomination, even if the media and pundits had showed gross bias and racism towards Obama, and favored Hillary. Both Hillary and Obama both had extremely similar positions and voting records on virtually every issue. A loss under any circumstances would not dissuade me from voting for the person who represents the issues that are clearly best for our country. I don’t need any time to make that kind of decision.
Posted by: Jillian | June 15, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
When are you people gonna realize that lobbying is not a 4 letter word? You do realize that for every corporate lobbyist, there are humanitarian and citizenry groups lobbying the gov’t? Do you honestly think that the pols are going to seek out the ‘issues that matter’ on their own? You need to research what your reps are doing and elect/re-elect them based on the merits of what they do/don’t do in DC.
Posted by: FishMonger | June 15, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
FM, again, nothing but attacks on Obama. The best that you can say about McCain is that he’s a left-leaning centrist like you? A little non-specific don’t you think? Good enough for me though, now I know where you stand on the issues. Vote for McCain or sit out like you said you will. Sounds like McCain really inspires you. I happen to like Obama’s positions, which happen to be almost the same as Hillary’s, and I’m sure you loved hers. I can’t stand any of McCain’s positions. Which issues or positions of McCain’s do you feel strongly about?
Posted by: Jillian | June 15, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
You didn’t answer my question. Let me help you. The entire ‘review’ of Obama background and judgement is selective beyond belief. “Look at my judgement on Iraq…but not on anything else from my personal life.” Guess what – IL senators didn’t vote on the Iraq war…so it’s ALL personal judgement.
This cherrypicking is like people who raise the bible and quote passages to live by. Funny that you never hear someone quote the parts that advocate violence, poor treatment of women, etc. I abhor those people too.
I’d vote for BO if he could stand up for the decisions he’s made up to this point. Most anyone looks good when you hold the lens at just the right angle.
No thanks.
Posted by: FishMonger | June 15, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
I don’t care one bit for those who
don’t like Obama. A bonehead can’t
put fear in our hearts. I want Obama to beat them all head on. I want us to beat
them with no mercy so that none
could claim we won because of their blessings. Let the chips fall where they may. Can we fight it out AND win?
Yes, we can!!! And we shall.
Posted by: Kurt Eric Munroe | June 15, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Every one of us, including politicians like Hillary and McCain have made mistakes of judgement. Of course Obama has made his share of mistakes, just not as many as Hillary and McCain. Our choice now is between the policy positions of Bush/McCain/Repubs and Obama/Hillary/Dems. Easy choice for most of us who’s hearts are not full of hate, spite, or bigotry. Why do so many people hate Obama for beating Hillary. The media was biased and some in the media (MSNBC) were cruel and sexist. I don’t fault Obama for the idiots in the media. There’s no doubt in my mind that Obama ran the superior campaign, brought new voters to the process, and has inspired the country to bigger and better things. Hillary came close, and she deserves our respect. Supporting Obama does not disrespect Hillary.
Posted by: Jillian | June 15, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Yawn…keep speaking in platitudes and pumping your fists.
Obama set himself up as a DC outsider with judgement. Wrong.
I’m heading to bed. Need to earn some money, so BO has a bigger target on my tax return.
Posted by: FishMonger | June 15, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
I find it very interesting that
those who hate Obama cannot and will
not simply point out the fine qualities
of others that they would prefer to
support. This is particularly true whenever they claim to be
democrats. So what is the real
reason behind their bitterness?
These bottom feeders don’t belong in
our party anyway.
Posted by: Kurt Eric Munroe | June 15, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
It wasn’t his time but his untested retoric, the idiotic youngsters, a shameful media and the black betrayal were too much for her despite her resilience.
I’been a democrat all my life but I will not vote for him. And since I rather die than vote for McCain, I’ll stay home. After all, my vote only counts half.
Posted by: IRD | June 16, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Your vote only counted for half in the PRIMARY because your state violated the rules.
Dont dramatize. The rules allowed the DNC to deny your state ANY representation.
Small states are first so rich people dont have utter domination, just most of the domination. Get over it and pay attention. Your constitution has been thrown out, you wont have any rights at all if you let the right wing stay in power. If that is ok with you, then sit this one out.
Posted by: bruce becker | June 16, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
I like the women, fans of the First Lady, who complain that the media are sexist. Really? And they are NOT racist? Wake up.
40 % of the population are RACISTS and SEXIST.
choose.
Posted by: bruce becker | June 16, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
McCain: Iraq policy based on taking over the Middle east, already rejected by Maliki.
Now Bush is threatening to steal $20 Billion from Iraq to extort them into allowing Bush and McCain to implement the Karl Rove theory of occupation and domination. Of course, this kind of policy is why the US is called Satan, in Iran, where the CIA overthrew their government over oil, when they installed the Shah. Paying attention? The war is a fake, the people behind it are traitors and they claim the high ground. If you follow the money you can see their plans. 4000 dead, for nothing.
Oil was going to go down to $20 a barrel, they said.
Iraq would pay for the war, they said. See any reality there yet? Vote for change, Vote for Obama and sanity will return to US policy.
Look past the racism. Oh yes, Wall Street Journal people voted that McCain would be better. Would that be because he will let them keep the Bush tax payoff?
Posted by: bruce becker | June 16, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
IRD. No one betrayed Hillary. They voted for someone else. Stop the emotional dramatization. Her prior experience is First Lady. People fall in love with First Ladies.
However, several other women Senators won on their own, without being wives of Presidents, and won many other offices before being Senators.
Boxer 4 terms in House before Senate deputy whip.
McCaskill, Governor, State Auditor and legislator and chief prosecutor of Kansas City before US Senate.
Feinstein, Supervisor of SF, two term Mayor of SF before US Senate.
Posted by: bruce becker | June 16, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
correction. Boxer FIVE terms in House before Senate Deputy whip.
Posted by: bruce becker | June 16, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
sonia trevino
NH is the first primary so that even YOU can run a campaign in a state with no cities and smaller than a Texas county. Get it? Mich and Florida with tens of millions, cannot be first, ever, no matter how jealous they get. They have too many people for an unknown to start a campaign.
Get it? It is not anti-Mich, it is pro-democracy.
Next time follow the rules.
Posted by: bruce becker | June 16, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Obama says he will restore habeas corpus, and neither Clinton nor McCain will.
At least vote for freedom, the one last chance we have.
Posted by: bruce becker | June 16, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
Stop putting down OBAMA for speaking well.
The entire point of the process is to speak about the issues. No suit is empty. No air is hot.
Those are false metaphors.
McCain speaks to keep us in a war with no end.
Obama speaks to restore our roads and put people back to work.
McCain voted against the GI Bill, which would have given education and low interest loans to vets.
Obama is for the Gi Bill.
Be free, and vote for Obama and end the repression of the end of habeas corpus.
Posted by: bruce becker | June 16, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
bruce becker,
” Stop putting down OBAMA for speaking well.”
That’s only if he has a teleprompter other than that he sounds like a bumbling idiot.
Posted by: J | June 16, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
I thought Edwards was Too Busy
Doing Those “Sunsetter” Awning
Commercials! LOL!
Posted by: reaganfan | June 16, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Forget John Edwards and put Elizabeth in instead.
Posted by: alpaig | June 16, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
What is wrong with Democrats.
How could they allow this to happen.
They should have won this election by a land slide.
It’s embarrassing.
An African American with radical lefties and a loser of a VP.
This is worse than having to watch Bush as President.
Posted by: Rick from Pa | June 16, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am
Obama will lose this election because no one really knows about the “elephant in the voting booth”
There will never be accurate polls until the day of the election.
Women are not being honest, kids won’t show up and the race factor is an unknown.
Obama will loose by a land slide.
Wake up America!
Posted by: Rick from Pa | June 16, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am
Wow, i think its funny how all you obama haters can come up with is stupid talking points. Come up with some REAL reasons not to vote for him.
Posted by: Obama 08 | June 16, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Typical Edwards, trying to suck up in order to be back in the limelight. One day he hates Obama, the next he wants to be his VP. I guess birds of a feather DO flock together…Obama and Edwards….21st Century “flip-floppers!”
Posted by: david from texas | June 16, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Can anyone, ANYONE name a politician who has not flip-flopped on anything? Okay, so Edwards re-arranged his wording. Better that he admit he’d consider the job if offered than watch McCain slowly adjust his supposedly progressive policies so they are perfect imitations of Bush’s.
And all you poor, wounded Dems, seriously? You’d vote for a man who doesn’t think ending a WAR is important and has openly admitted he knows nothing about the economy just because your candidate didn’t get nominated? Or because your local legislators screwed you over by moving up the primary? Seriously, its not all about You, you know.
Posted by: Kerry Ann | June 16, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
I live in Michigan and OBAMA wouldn’t come to our state before, now he’s been here 3 times in the last month.
Hmmmm….he needs us now….also now I HEAR ON THE NEWS HE THINKS THEY SHOULD COUNT OUR FULL DELEGATES NOT HALF.
Yup, he sure can change….like the wind.
Posted by: Jan in MI | June 16, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Why should the vp goes to someone who could not even carry his own state in the last prez election …
Posted by: The Golden State | June 17, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am
Earl: I’m with you all the way. Obama is trying to impress the public that he knows all about foreign policy when he doesn’t even know that much about politics. The only reason that he wants to be president is to compete with MLK because MLK made history and Obama read numerous books on him. Obama will never be the speaker that MLK was and MLK didn’t copy speeches. He could stand up on that platform and speak without a script. Obama uses the speeches of RFK and his words of hope and change. Hillary should never have had Solis in her campaign because Solis’s husband is an Obama supporter and belongs to the Daley machine. Hillary mad a lot of mistakes but the DNC are the one’s who went to the superdelegates along with Obama and made deals with them to vote for Obama. Nancy wants to be the women in power and didn’t want Hillary to be president. I hope everything bounces back on them leavint them to regret the damage they did.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | June 17, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am