Mark Penn Says Hillary Clinton’s Problem Was Money — Even Though She Raised More Than $225 Million
The New York Times Op-Ed page called in a number of political coroners to perform their own autopsies on Sen. Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
Each has a point to make. Time’s Mark Halperin and Politico’s John Harris point to Clinton’s loss of African-American support while Radar’s Ana Marie Cox examines how Clinton may have done in by her own embrace of what Richard Hofstadter called the "paranoid style of American politics."
The University of Pennsylvania’s Kathleen Hall Jamieson says Clinton could never get past her vote to authorize use of force against Iraq, the New Republic’s Michelle Cottle sees significance in Clinton’s wormy debate answer on then-Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s doomed proposal to give drivers’ licenses to illegal immigrants, while the two Republicans whose opinions were solicited — former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman and Rep. Heather Wilson, R-NM — saw sexism from the media and from superdelegates, respectively.
Only one actual member of the Clinton campaign took time out from his schedule to write something for the Times — controversial consultant Mark Penn, who alone cited money as the reason Clinton lost.
"The Problem Wasn’t the Message — It Was the Money," wrote the man whose task was the message. While everyone loves to talk about the message, campaigns are equally about money and organization. Having raised more than $100 million in 2007, the Clinton campaign found itself without adequate money at the beginning of 2008, and without organizations in a lot of states as a result. Given her successes in high-turnout primary elections and defeats in low-turnout caucuses, that simple fact may just have had a lot more to do with who won than anyone imagines."
Let’s just take a moment, however, to visit the facts on that one. Because when the books about this campaign are written, they should make clear that while Clinton’s campaign spent money often unwisely, it never had any problem raising cash.
History will record that the Clinton campaign raised more than $225 million for her campaign — and more than $200 million of that was for the primary.
Clinton fundraisers took in more than $100 million in the first five months of 2008 — essentially matching what they raised in all of 2007.
The Clinton campaign had $50 in the bank as of Oct. 1, 2007, and $35 million in the bank as of Dec. 31, 2007.
Right before the Iowa caucuses, Penn told the Clintons that he was positive she was going to win, a high-level Clinton campaign source tells me. And he told them turnout wouldn’t exceed 150,000 (it was more than 230,000 at the end of the day.)
Obama raised more than Clinton, no question. But Clinton’s problem was not "the money." The money was there. How it was spent, and what it was spent on — including some high-priced consultants — well, that’s another issue.
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Kind of Ironic since Hillary will still try every dirty trick in the book to make Obama lose in the General Election now.
Hillary is power hungry and the only way she will have any chance for a presidential run in 2012 is if Obama loses. So fellow Democrats vote for McCain so we can vote for Hillary for President in 2012.
Posted by: 2012 | June 8, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Its amazing how most supporters who say they’ll back Mccain as a protest against Obama fail to mention why.
Could it be that the idea of a black man becoming the president of the US scares you? lol
Think.
Given your current situation, $4 gas, food prices, and job losses, you’d vote for a 71 yr old, damn near senile man, with recurrent melanoma who can’t tell Sunnis apart from Shiats and has himself admitted to not knowing about the economy?
I swear to God, you’re all bunch of sad excuses for vote holders.
Old white men have ruled this nation since its founding fathers. Change.
OBAMA 08/12
Posted by: amazed | June 8, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
No Mark Penn.
It was the DNC led by Dean and Pelosi who wanted a far left wing liberal (worse than Kerry) with no experience to lead them. They excluded MI and FL to propel this weak asp candidate to prevent the WOMAN from doing it.
Bush v. Gore of 2008 in the DNC
Well let me put something to you Obama, I am UNCOMMITTED. You ain’t **** and the DNC should be ashamed of themselves for picking this weak excuse of a candidate to go against McCain.
Posted by: knowledgeforreal | June 8, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Can’t Mark Penn just take the remaining money and shut up his big mouth???
Posted by: Mark Webb | June 8, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
amazed, take a look at your own comment – “you’re all bunch of sad excuses for vote holders. Old white men have ruled this nation since its founding fathers. Change.”
are you supporting Obama because he is “black”? …now there’s a strong reason for change —NOT! Get educated and vote based on past performance and the candidates commitment and likelihood to fulfill campaign promises.
Posted by: Jeff | June 8, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
I’m supporting McCain to send a message to the DNC so that we don’t ever get in a mess like this again. Shame on them for letting an inexperienced person get the nomination.
Posted by: Jeff | June 8, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Obama isn’t my choice for president, and the DNC is no prize either. I don’t trust either.
Since Hillary is out I’m supporting McCain for his humility,strength, experience and patriotism.
Posted by: cindy in nc | June 8, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
“Inexperienced” is the new “Black.” It’s as simple as that. Racism, disguised.
As for Mark Penn, his hugely inflated salary is a big part of the money woes the Clinton campaign experienced, along with the salaries of his cohorts. The campaign spent money like the primary season would be over on Super Tuesday, and never recovered. Just part of the overall poor management of those overpriced hucksters. Can only blame Hillary in that she picked those guys and listened to them.
Well, Obama came along with a new strategy, and a much better focus on the long haul, with a relatively consistent message and little infighting — another huge contrast to the Clinton campaign! And now he’s the nominee!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: jackt51 | June 8, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Hillary’s problem was ‘Mark Penn’ and his huge fees for polls and his disloyalty by subverting her campaign and those core values that her campaign supported. Her campaign leaders assumed that she would win and did not make the moves to support her. Hillary was valiant in her fight, but lacked the campaign team and media supporters to back her up. Obama team followed a structured plan to win, and the steamroller bamboozler approach has worked exceedingly well for them.
Posted by: Sally | June 8, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
I am in total agreement with Todd and Wilson that misogyny was the tool to stop Hillary Clinton. But I agree with Knowledgeforreal below, that the dictatorial hand of Howard Dean was behind the strategy, that he is a radical product of the 60′s intent on taking this country toward the far left.
We don’t need social destabilization akin to what happened in the 60′s. While much was gained, much was lost as a consequence of what happened in that period. Citizens need to be engaged again in the process of democracy to make change happen, not rabble rising unrest.
Clintons for McCain.
Posted by: roberta | June 8, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Sally, I agree with you. They got blindsided by Obama. But Hillary should have fired Penn early on. What a detriment he was to her campaign.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Hillary was a better candidate than her campaign. Her disadvantage was 24/7 media villification. Her disadvantage was the DNC was complicit in disenfanchising HER voters in Michigan and Florida and elsewhere. Her disadvantage was the stupidity of the DNC giving meaningless caucus wins equal weight to critical, must win primary states that Hillary won BIG. Obama won NONE.
Obama is a lesser candidate than his campaign. His advantage was 24/7 glowing media coverage. His advantage was having DNC Chair Howard Dean on his team. His advantage was having access to an obscene amount of money. Follow the money trail and you find the answers you seek.
Hillary Clinton is clearly the better candidate. She proved she can win the big, must win states for the Dems in a general election. Hillary’s detailed grasp of domestic and international issues is unmatched.
The Democrats are foolish if they nominate an unqualified and unelectable Obama.
The Democratic party MUST be held accountable for their failure to denounce the rampant sexism, racism, classism and voter disenfranchisment continually interjected into this campaign debacle of 2008 by Barack Obama, his campaign, his nasty supporters and ALL MEDIA.
The Democratic party understands two things, money and votes. WE have the power to withhold BOTH. Do so. Put your country first and party second. Vote for McCain if the Dems fail to nominate Hillary Clinton at the DNC conventin in late August. The race is NOT officially over until the. Call the DNC, call the delegates and tell them you are not happy with their decisions.
If we don’t speak out now, WHEN?
**You must do the thing which you think you cannot do** Eleanor Roosevelt
Posted by: J | June 8, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
The DNC and pelosi and dean, Playing God and political fixers. Chose their candidate early on. Then Started the DNC machine into gear. The fed the media, they pressure the super delegates.
It was Obvious to the whole country to see.
Then icing on the cake was brazzie, with her blood in the streets and getting the super delegates to commit.
The split the party down the middle. Can the democratic party get together and heal with them.
Posted by: seah | June 8, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
I don’t think so.
The big roles on her lost are,
The DNC, SuperD’s,MSM
Posted by: catleya | June 8, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
thank you j.
i listen to all of the people who had a part in cheating our country out of the chance to get back on the right track.
and you hear the worry in their voices when they say, “i think sen. clinton’s supporters will come home” or they say
listen they voted for her not because they dislike obama-their message is basically the same”
they keep saying-it is just the women mad and feelings hurt. discounting the fact that we are men, women, black, white, and educated and have been paying attention to the candidates and their message.
i will not vote for obama in the fall for the same reasons i did not vote for him in the primaries. I am a patriot. and i do love this country and want it back on the right track.
these either of these two will not be able to do that.
if none of the above were on the ballot.
none of the above would win in a landslide.
Posted by: justsaying | June 8, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
jackt51, please give it a rest with the new defintion of racism. Comments like yours make me and a lot of other people sick to their stomach of Barack Obama and his followers. Obama is part of a white hating racist church. Hillary Clinton and her husband have done nothing but help the black cause for over 20 years. You throw words like “racism” around like playing catch with your son in the backyard. The only candidate who “played the race card” was Obama and his supporters. But, because he is black, ANYONE WHO OPPOSED HIM OR HIS IDEAS IS A “RACIST”. You can give it a rest now, he is the nominee, you only make yourself look foolish with this ongoing campaign of yours.
Posted by: JRS | June 8, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
For 3/4 of the primary season Clinton had no message.
Obama’s message was always Change. A Change of politics, policies and how things are done in Washington.
When Clinton found her populist message it was then to late.
She also played into the stereotype of “Old” Washington. Her thoughts of bringing Obama’s negatives up to bring her negatives down failed. Her divisive language turned off many voters.
Her and Bill’s flaps also played a major roll. The Jesse Jackson SC comments, Hillary never apologizing for her Iraqi War vote, Bosnia, NAFTA, Mark Penn, Kennedy/Obama assasination comments, “inevitable” candidate attitude etc
All big flaps
Posted by: Vanessa | June 8, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
I will vote for McCain not because I am upset that HC lost, but because he is a moderate Republican with a lot of experience who is not afraid to cross party lines to get something done. We need a moderate in the White House, not a right wing idiot like Bush, or a left wing fanatic like Obama. Hillary is a moderate Democrat, and would have fit the bill nicely. The last thing this country needs right now is another extremist as President, just look where it has gotten us since 2000. All of those of you who cry foul when people say they will vote McCain because Hillary lost have a lot of nerve questioning voters values and intelligence. There are many, many who are terrified of the idea of Obama becoming president because he is an EXTREME LIBERAL. There are a lot more “moderate Democrats” out there than there are liberals, trust me.
Posted by: JRS | June 8, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
The Democratic party understands two things, money and votes. WE have the power to withhold BOTH. Do so. Put your country first and party second. Vote for McCain if the Dems fail to nominate Hillary Clinton at the DNC conventin in late August. The race is NOT officially over until the. Call the DNC, call the delegates and tell them you are not happy with their decisions.
Yes, we will do.
Voters rule!!! (McCain in November)
Posted by: Jkan | June 8, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Penn also admitted to organization and a good opponent as being factors for he loss. He may or may not have been overpaid.
Clinton’s 225 million is a lot of money for a primary. Information as to how much Obama had is left out, so there’s no contrast.
Posted by: katrina | June 8, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Vanessa,
will you please tell us how what bill clinton said about jesse jackson racist?
jesse jackson said he didn’t take it to be racist.
so will you tell us how it was racist.
Posted by: justsaying | June 8, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
“… Obama raised more than Clinton, no question. But Clinton’s problem was not “the money.” The money was there. How it was spent, and what it was spent on — including some high-priced consultants — well, that’s another issue.”
Considering the debt our nation is in at this time, this makes me all the more sure Obama has the type of KNOWLEDGE, know-how we need!
Posted by: astrid399 | June 8, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Why can’t Clinton supporters ADMIT that she ran a horrible campaign??? It wasn’t Obama’s fault, the DNC’s fault or anyone’s fault except her own!! If she couldn’t run her campaign without going into tens of millions of dollars of debt, how in the world do you think she can run the country without putting us further in debt???
The insane hatred depicted on these message boards really does nothing for the country! Why don’t the supporters of both candidates try to be like them and bury the hatchet for the good of the country? This backbiting, name calling, irrational anger and blame will not help us bring back jobs, increase wages, tackle a broken healthcare system, end the war in Iraq, take care of our veterans they way they deserve or anything else useful!
Someone had to lose the primary; they both couldn’t win. Obama ran a superior campaign to Clinton (even her supporters have to admit that). Clinton’s team did a terrible job of managing her money and her message; that’s why she lost–Obama had nothing to do with her defeat, except for the fact that he simply ran a better campaign than she did.
Democrats, let’s win back the White House in November for the country and stop all this infighting and divisiveness! Let’s turn our full attention and energy on defeating the republicans in November!!
Posted by: Sanity | June 8, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Money was a factor in many states with Obama consistently outspending HIllary double and even as much as five times. On the airwaves, that is significant.
Sexism was a huge problem with the MSM, the candiates, and the DNC.
The Rules Comm. was determined that Obama would be the nominee and damn the Rules!! No DNC rule allows the Committee to take delegates away from one candidate and deliver them to another. No DNC rule allows the Committee to deliver “uncommitted” delegates to any candidate. “Uncommitted” is a designated category according to the DNC Rules.
Obama was annointed, not elected.
Posted by: countallthevotes | June 8, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
No it wasn’t money, it was the poorly run campaign, the disloyalty of many in her base (i.e. the black voters that went 90% Obama) and Bill overpowering HER message. But the thing I think really cost her the nomination was that so many of the democratic leaders (Kerry, Kenndy, Richardson, etc.) gave their support to Obama even when she won the states those leaders represent. Obama wouldn’t have gained the nomination without their help.
Posted by: JR | June 8, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Its so easy to blame media and DNC rules for her loss by clinton supporters. I do not blame the supporters themselves as the clintons themselves perpetuated lie this to mask their poorly run campaign.
Nobody complained about the media when in the whole of 2007 she was treated as the presumptive nominee, and everybody knew the rules of the game and signed off the rules before the primaries started.
Clintonites, please get a life!
Posted by: sandy | June 8, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
i had to go away, but i was hoping when i got back vanessa would have answered the question of how what bill clinton said about jesses jackson was racist.
jesse said he didn’t take it to be racist.
so if there is anyone out there that thinks what bill clinton said is sc about jesse jackson was racist. please tell me how. i will appreciate it.
Posted by: justsaying | June 8, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
“Sexism was a huge problem with the MSM”
Sexism does not drive one to vote against Clinton.
Another reason for Clinton’s lost. The Victim card.
There has been sexist comments said by the MSM and racist comments said by the MSM.
My belief is Clinton supporters are looking for anyone but Clinton to blame for her lost.
Obama’s the better candidate/campaigner.
The MSM does not have such a big effect has many of you claim. You give them too much power.
Both Obama and Clinton were victims of the MSM; Bosnia, Rev. Wright, Jesse Jackson Bill comment, Pastor Pledger, NAFTA, Bitter-gate, Kennedy/Obama assasination etc.
Clinton lost b/c she underestimated Obama.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 8, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Mark Penn’s strategy was to focus on the large states because they had the most delegates. He actually thought it was winner take all until Harold Ickes set him straight. That should have been a cue to fire him right there.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
2012…That’s my plan.
Posted by: carolyn | June 8, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
vanessa…….if Obama loses to McCain are you going to blame him? Obama, that is.
Posted by: JR | June 8, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
justsaying
Perhaps if Bill Clinton had mentioned a candidate who was white and had lost, some people whould not have taken it that way! By using Jesse Jackson some felt he was essentially saying that “some other black guy won here and still lost”.
Does that answer your question?
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Obama was annointed, not elected.
Posted by: countallthevotes |
You mean like the way Obama gave Clinton more than the 50% which the committe was going to give her in Michigan? Do you really think that she would have gotten a larger share in Michigan if that election was legal?
This is how she’s been able to claim that she won the popular vote. Now that’s annoitment! You do know that Detroit is still in Michigan don’t you.
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Melissa…Throwing people under a bus is what Obama does best. I think he has Alzheimer’s or Dementia because he can never remember anything about them. He flip flops like with Wright and Rezko. Heck, he never even remembered meeting Auchi and yet Obama and Michelle both went to Rezko’s home and toasted Auchi. That came out at Rezko’s trial. Obama has been to Ayer’s home but says he barely knows him. This guy is too dangerous to trust with this country. Believe me! There are many, many reasons.
Posted by: carolyn | June 8, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Thank You Roxanne.
Ex. George Wallace won the SC primary in 76′ against Jimmy Carter and still lost the nomination. Why Jesse Jackson? As a Clinton backer said, they wanted to play the race card to divide the two races in favor of Clinton. It back-fired.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 8, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
JRS
In the last 8 years McCain has voted along with George Bush 90% of the time. Exactly where has he crossed party lines? 10% out of 100 isn’t even HALF!
McSame, indeed! All of you who would vote for McCain should remember something. There are a lot of Republicans who are crossing over to vote for Obama so go ahead. I have the feeling they will off set the loss of some of you “so called democrats”
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Vanessa…Actually, how could Clinton’s campaign have been so horrible and Obama’s so good??? Hillary got the popular vote and was cheated out of Fl. and Mic. In any normal election her campaign would have won. Just think if the media had been behind her how well she would have done,. The DNC was against her as well. Obama spent 3 times the money and couldn’t close the deal. People have rocks in their head not to see this. The Superdelegates decided the deal. Now wait, the blacks said all along that if the Superdelegates decided the election they would burn buildings and riot if the Superdelegates took the election away from Obama. But even though the media kept saying the Superdelegates would have to step in, the blacks still threatened to riot. But, Oh…since they chose Obama it was o.k. Blacks are lucky that the white’s didn’t riot. We have a lot more class than that. We know she was stepped on and treated unfairly and I live in Florida and I am done with the DNC. That’s how you rebel. You show them them can’t win without the voters.
Posted by: carolyn | June 8, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Yeah, Clinton’s campaign was so horrible that she got half the vote.
Posted by: JR | June 8, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
THE “EXCUSE” LIST CONTINUES
It’s Obama’s fault
It’s the DNC’s fault
It’s Mark Penn’s fault
It’s the right wing conspiracy’s fault
It’s the left wing conspiracy’s fault
It’s Howard Dean’s fault
It’s the FL & MI delegations’ fault
It’s the African American’s fault
It’s the educated voters’ fault
It’s the radical’s fault
It’s the caucus’ fault
It’s the students’ fault
It’s Bill’s fault
It’s the media’s fault
It’s the primary systems’ fault
It’s sexist America’s fault
It’s those mean Reverends’ fault
It’s Move On’s fault – as per Bill
It’s the Rules Committee’s fault
It’s the majority of states, the majority of those pesky voters, the majority of pledged delegates, and the majority of super delegates’ fault.
But it’s never that Hillary simply wasn’t the best candidate.
No never.
Posted by: The Reason | June 8, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Time magazine commented that the problem early in Hillary’s campaign was that it was top-down rather than grassroots like the Obama campaign.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
J,
I’m speaking out now, just received a solicitation from the DNC, sorry ‘no thank’ you. Hillary is the only candidate I ever contributed towards, the DNC can rely on Obama’s excellent methods of fundraising for the DEM party. For years I’ve settled on a nominee ‘they’ thought was the right choice, i.e. Kerry?! I don’t want to settle any longer.
========================================
Hillary/Your Choice 2008 WRITE IN
========================================
Posted by: sayitso | June 8, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Tell that to the Clinton camp b/c earlier on in the primary season they agreed with Obama that whomever wons the pledge delegate should win the nomination. It’s when the Obama camp built an insurmountable lead in the pledge delegate they begain spinning every metric in the book.
Lets for the sake of arguement give Clinton the popular vote. We’ve learned in the 2000 election popular vote does not give one the presidency.
We had the magic number 2118 for reason.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 8, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Melissa…We will all be blessed if the only thing wrong with an Obama Presidency (If he becomes President.)is if he is unfaithful to Michelle. I think that would be the least of our problems.
Posted by: carolyn | June 8, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Does anyone really care?
If you don’t give us something to blog about, and do not control the trolls who come on, somewhat, you will not have a blog for long.
Posted by: Thinking | June 8, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Yeah, Clinton’s campaign was so horrible that she got half the vote.
Posted by: JR
And she still lost! His campaign was very fiscally responsible because even in states that he knew he was unlikely to win, he flooded the air ways with ads and forced her to spend money where she shouldn’t have had to! He forced her to play defense and in so doing, forced them to exhaust all their resources!
Now that’s somebody you want on your side. If he can run this country with the same attention to detail we’re gonna be ok!
Obama 08
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
carolyn
Why are you people still stuck on this church crap? If he was running for Pastor or Pope you might have an issue. The fact is that he’s running for President and that’s all that his supporters care about. By the way, while I do believe in God, I haven’t gone to church since I was a kid. I couldn’t care less about people who do. It’s your right but don’t expect the rest of us to get stuck in that quagmire!
Obama 08 – FOR PRESIDENT, NOT PASTOR!
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
vanessa,
thank you roxanne,
so you throw out statement and need someone else to back them up?
I think bill clinton thought he was dealing with a politics as he had known them. if obama and his supporters didn’t want this to be about race, they would not have been so quick to call every little thing racist.
clinton has done more for black people than any president, and only the obama people could come along and call it racist. it was not a racist statement, any more than joe bidens statement about obama. you see obama quickly came to biden defense. why not bill, because it was to obama advantage to have that played as race.
Posted by: justsaying | June 8, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
JRS:
How can I stop referencing your racism when you are so blatant about it? You are so full of bull-pucky that it is truly annoying. Must watch faux news and get your talking points from Mark Penn!!! And he simply ran a better campaign than Hillary, thanks to Mark Penn and Company in large part. With an assist from Bubba!
There is nothing “racist” about Trinity UCC. It is a black church, which may be a bit foreign to you pasty guys, but not racist!
Sorry, but anyone who votes for McBush in November and claims to be a democrat or Clinton supporter, is just so full of crap that they should have themselves committed now and get it over with. Four more years of bush3 is not a good way to mourn your candidate’s loss.
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: jackt51 | June 8, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
carolyn | Jun 8, 2008
Ayers is a neighbor. Now I’ve read that he claims to have been some sort of radical and that they were bombing government buildings back in the sixties. Obama was EIGHT YEARS OLD AT THE TIME! I believe he held a fundraiser at his home for Obama when he was starting out. And why hasn’t Ayers been arrested? By the way, if Charles Manson was released from prison and moved next door to you, would that make you a murderer?
It’s fine if you don’t like Obama but at least try to come up with something personal. You mentioned his lips before. Sadly, at least that pertains directly to him.
PATHETIC!
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Obama supporters were not quick to call Bill comments racist. It was the media.
Wrong assumption, Obama is to blame for everything the media says/do
Posted by: Vanessa | June 8, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
you must check your states election rules before you think you can write in a name for president.
i think the best thing to do is just vote for mccain.
roe v wade will not be overturned.
and just get your financial affairs in order as best a possible (with either of these candidates) and get ready to ride it out over the next four years.
with exception of bill clinton the dems have been loses anyway. and they will lose this time.
bill clinton was a left-to center dem.
that is why he was elected.
obama being the most liberal of all will not win. anytime the to extremes of the parties get in we the citizens lose.
Posted by: justsaying | June 8, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
carolyn, how is McCain different from Bush when they have the exact same policies. He wants to continue the war and continue the Bush economic plan.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Just think how well she would have spent our money! Free healthcare would have been quite expensive.
Posted by: Kevin J | June 8, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
MONEY:
The article “where you were sleeping”, of May 27, 2008 indicated that Clinton had not money by Super Tuesday and Obama built his advantage in February with a net gain of 121 delegates while Clinton was raising money.
After February, Clinton got 53% of the votes winning 9 primaries versus Obama 47%, 4 primaries, 2 caucuses. However, Clinton got meaningless gain of delegates a per the DNC formula assigning delegates per previous turn out.
AFRICAN AMERICANS:
Based on the DNC formula, African American districts received up 3 times more delegates per voter. For instance, South Texas Hispanic districts received 8 delegates while Harris County, Texas, received 24 delegates with the same turn out.
Democratic primary was not like Mandela slogan: “One Person, One Vote”
MEDIA AND SEXISM:
No question. Obama has never done anything wrong as per the media.
ESTABLISHMENT:
Obama was the candidate of the establishment, but Clinton was wrongly described by the Media as such. For instance, Howard Dean gave to Obama all his Internet listing with young and anti-war voters when Dean was running his campaign in 2004.
RESULT:
Democrats has a wounded candidacy having problems among Hispanics, older voters, women, working class voters.
Posted by: Angel | June 8, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
You forget,that democrats are very unforgiving when it comes to losers. They don’t recycle their candidates.
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Angel
But he beat your candidate!
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
lisad…This war was about oil. McCain is not involved in oil.
Posted by: carolyn | June 8, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Many of the reasons expressed below are valid and probably did have an effect in Sen. Clinton not winning the election. To say that the caucuses were unfair may be true. But as I see it, the rules of the campaign — including the rules governing the caucuses — were there for each candidate to see, had they taken the time to read and understand the rules.
Sen. Clinton’s biggest mistake was probably expecting to have the nomination sewed up following the Feb 5th primaries. When that didn’t happen, she looked a lot like Big Brown yesterday — out of gas, nothing left. While it took her awhile she did eventually regroup. But that was not her first mistake. Her first mistake was to go along with the stripping of the FL and MI delegates. She should have fought for letting “all the votes count” from the very beginning. After having gone along with the sanctions, and then flip-flopping when it was to her benefit, that just proved that she was really only thinking of herself and not of the electorate when she finally decided to fight for the votes to count and the delegates to be seated.
Posted by: James Danley | June 8, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Hillary lost because she thought she was owed the nomination and the presidency all because she was Bill’s wife.
Posted by: feminist50 | June 8, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
carolyn, regardless of why the war was started, we are over there. And McCain will continue it just like Bush would. So how about the economy. Same economy with McCain.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Obama isn’t running for President, he’s running to be Moses. Right after he causes the rising oceans to recede and heals the earth what’s he going to do about the economy? Who’s he going to choose as his running mate, Santa Clause? Do you Obama people all still believe in fairy tales? This is mass hysteria at it’s finest.
Posted by: Realistic | June 8, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
The DNC needs to learn a lesson – big time. My vote for McCain will help ensure that this is accomplished. What where they thinking?
Posted by: steve | June 8, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Obama won the popular vote
Obama won more states
Obama received more pledged delegates
Obama received more super delegates
Obama received the nomination. He earned it by all counts. He won by the rules to which BOTH candidates agreed. That’s the way a candidate is chosen.
It’s not that difficult to understand. There will always be one winner and those who didn’t win.
Sexism, racism, the media are all just excuses. From the beginning, Hillary had every possible advantage. Had she not run a short-sighted campaign, she probably would have won.
However, Hillary assumed the primary would be over in February. This is a fact. Who is you blame for underestimating an opponent?
It’s not sexism or the media that underestimated Obama. It was Hillary and her campaign staff. If you feel the need to blame someine, perhaps you should place it where it belongs.
Posted by: The Reason | June 8, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Kevinj…By the way reparations would cost trillions. Here’s the guy Obama copied on “Yes we can” slogan. This is the guy they regret electing due to lack of experience. He was a token I guess.
Posted by: carolyn | June 8, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
We voted for Hillary. We will vote for McCain. We won’t vote for self-hating racists Obama and his followers.
Posted by: peter | June 8, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
lisa I can’t vote for someone who will continue the Bush policies. That’s a simple fact. He’s experienced all right. He took Bush 101.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
lisa d…It would be a safer and better Administration than the one Obama will
have. Read about N’Cobra and Wright and Farrakhan and reparations and tell me how we would be safer with the economy and the inexperienced candidate that is friends with Wright and Farrakhan. A wife that hates this country is another problem. She is a racist. Wright and Farrakhan are racists. Obama pulls the race card all the time. What about Rezko, Auchi and all the lies Obama flip flps on. These people are real.
Posted by: carolyn | June 8, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Think we should go to war with Iran and spend a few trillion there?
go ahead and vote for McCain.
Think the current admin’s economic policies are great?
go ahead and vote for McCain
Think uppity women have too many rights anyway?
go ahead and vote for McCain
Posted by: Citizen Voter | June 8, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
JRS, thanks for stating the obvious message that the DNC needs to hear. I agree and will vote for the moderate candidate – McCain. McCain is pro-US. It doesn’t matter who BHO might pick for his VP; his VP won’t change who he is and his lack of experience, even if he does pick Oprah.
Posted by: Sally | June 8, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
John McCain – Another “experienced” Politician uses his Judgement on the War
“There’s not a history of clashes that are violent between Sunnis and Shiahs. So I think they can probably get along.” [MSNBC, 4/23/03]
“Because I know that as successful as I believe we will be, and I believe that the success will be fairly easy,” [CNN, 9/24/02]
“We’re not going to get into house-to-house fighting in Baghdad.” [CNN, 9/29/02]
“But the point is that, one, we will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” [MSNBC, 1/22/03]
“But I believe that the Iraqi people will greet us as liberators.” [NBC, 3/20/03]
“It’s clear that the end is very much in sight.” [ABC, 4/9/03]
“This is a mission accomplished.” [This Week, ABC, 12/14/03]
OLD DOES NOT MEAN WISE. McCain was in the BOTTOM 1% (795 of 800)of his class. He has made repeated miscalculations about the war. He has admitted that he doesn’t understand economics. So out of spite, you’ll vote for him anyway? That’s real smart thinking. Haven’t we had enough of moron GOP “yes men” running the country into the ground? Guess some folks don’t think so.
You go ahead, whine and take the “experienced” McBush. We’ll keep standing behind the smart guy and make him President.
Obama 08!
Posted by: Brains before "Experience" | June 8, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
“Angel
But he beat your candidate!”
Posted by: roxanne:
————————
George W. Bush also beat my candidate in 2000 and 2004.
So, I am 0-for-3 after voting for the best candidate to be US President!!
Posted by: Angel | June 8, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
What a hoot!
Maybe she lost because you were an inept EXPENSIVE campaign manager! How many millions did she pay you? 10% of the money she raised?
Maybe her opponent ran a thrifty campaign on a shoestring and raised a boatload of money from small donors?
Hillary might be awful smart but obviously so is Obama – and he is a better manager for the country where we are now.
He’s the right person and the right time, and she isn’t. She’s the older generation and he is the next generation. He understands the internet and she didn’t.
Posted by: vmcgreen | June 8, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Yes carolyn I have read all about these things. So tell me how another republican administration would be better. Are you better off than you were 4 years ago. If you are than I am happy for you, but I’m not and most of this country isn’t either. We cannot continue with this economy. We cannot continue with this war. We can’t afford another 4 years with McCain who won’t do anything about it. These are the real issues that affect our day to day life. So please tell me if you are better off. If I was I guess I would vote for McCain too.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
There’s only one candidate who flew covert operations into hostile sniper filled territories.
Funny that heroics like that aren’t rewarded.
Posted by: Irrelevant Politicians Club | June 8, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
How could the media be biased against Hillary when 50% of the media are women?
Posted by: Pfeifer | June 8, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Angel
So losing is a way of life for you!
I’m glad you’re not voting for Obama!
The streak lives!
Obama 08
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Mary
Can you give me one racist comment that came from Obama’s mouth?
Seriously!
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Racist would rather vote for McCain and see the country continue to go down the toilet than vote for Obama and see the country go forward. The world is watching America. Will we have respect or contempt for America from the world
Posted by: Pfeifer Lacy | June 8, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Roxanne,
You are debating with fool’s. These are the same people that said BO would not be the PN, now that he is and has HRC’s backing they are spinning a new spin. I applaud your efforts but it won’t stop. When he’s elected POTUS, it will be a different spin. People are just not ready to accept that the face of America is going to change and the fear grips them uncontrollably.
Posted by: PittBull61 | June 8, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
I am a Black female who was 100% behind Hillary in the beginning. I began being swayed as I was…am smart enough to realize that most big changes happen when we the people are inspired and thus, demand change. I realized that Obama was the candidate to make that happen. If I had any doubt about my change, it was confirmed when even my young daughter was floored and dismayed that Hillary could & would LIE about sniper fire….I could not vote for a person without integrity.
Posted by: Shar | June 8, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Mai how exactly is Obama the cancer on the soul of America. People make these off the wall comments yet don’t explain them.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
If McCain isn’t Bush can you find one policy is which they differ?
Posted by: Vanessa | June 8, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Why do you people HATE Obama? Grow up and be adults about your decisions. Why are you all “Hillay pawns” or bargaining chips. In every competion there is a winner and a loser…did we not all realize that???
Posted by: Shar | June 8, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Why do you people HATE Obama?
Posted by: Shar | Jun 8, 2008 10:36:19 I can answer that Shar. It’s because they’re jealous. Think about it. Obama is so totally together. He ran a fantastic campaign and it’s killing them. But if you’ll notice, all of the critisim is directed at people who he knows. It’s not the same personal critisims that we Obama supporters had about Hillary. She’s the one who’s seen as a liar and someone who refused at every turn to admit to any mistakes. I remember John Edwards apologizing for his vote on the war but not Hillary. She kept saying that she voted based on the information they were given. Well, no one was questiong that…they just wanted to hear her say that it was a mistake and she couldn’t even do that. After the Bitter comments, I recall Obama saying that he probably could have said it better and that it wasn’t the first and probably would not be the last time he said something that came out wrong. It made me like him even more after he said that. We’re all human and make mistakes…just not Hillary!
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
If it was just about the money, Mr. Gates or Mr. Buffett or some other wealthy person would seek the office. Take heart. It seems there are still some things money can’t buy.
Posted by: texasdemocrat | June 8, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Thank you for your response Roxanne.
Obama is not perfect -but I never saw such sour grapes in my life. As much as now have no respect for the Clintons do-and-say-anything-to-win politics, I am not stupid enough to vote for McSame if Obama had lost. I would have not eaten all day and held my nose and voted for Hillary…for MY OWN best interests…pepople!!!
Posted by: Shar | June 8, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Mag, that explains why you won’t vote for Obama. S Retirees and seniors are scared of change. They want the old school politicians.
Posted by: erin | June 8, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Let the finger pointing begin.
Posted by: Omentum | June 8, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Just like a woman, blows 225 million in just 1 1/2 years and still could not balance her checkbook nor cared how much it cost others.
Wonder how much of that she filtered to her own bank account ?
Any you really expected her to handle our tac dollars. Really shows when someone spends a fortune for a job that would have paid 225 times less that she had another motive in wanting the oval office.
Ubama is no better, they are all crooks and con artists.
Taxpayers cannot find a job, feed their familes or even buy gas for the car and this greedy SOBs blowing close to 1/2 billion dollars to buy their way into the oval office and we wonder why there is talk of a civil war here.
Posted by: JR | June 8, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
The process of selecting a nominee is exactly that: a selection, not an election. In the end, Senator Clinton is not the nominee because she was not selected by the required number of delegates.
So, then, how do you get the delegates? Well, by winning some in primaries and caucuses and also by convincing superdelegates that you are the best candidate. Mark Penn’s assertion of ‘not enough money’ is a pale attempt to veil his inadequacy in this campaign. Now, I’m not privy to the innards of the Clinton campaign, but I seriously doubt he was fighting hard for organizing for the caucuses – he probably that it was a waste of time and money. He was wrong; he should just admit that the strategy was flawed, that they served Senator Clinton poorly and move on.
Posted by: MIguy | June 8, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Exactly Shar!
Mag reminds me of that woman who showed up at that meeting to settle the Michigan and Florida votes a couple of weeks ago.
She sounded like a 3 pac a day Mrs. Dubchek. Many of the older women who say they will vote for McCain instead of Obama fall under an acronym I came up with last night.
H.A.G.G.S.
Housewives Against Good Government!
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
I think it was Obama’s fault. He had a nearly flawless campaign.
Posted by: Omentum | June 8, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
@JR:
I too am bothered by the amount of money being spent on these campaigns. However, I wish I knew how each dollar spent is allocated. Depending on the breakdown (i.e., if it is spent buying American made goods, paying for health insurance for organizers), it may actually be helpful to the economy. In fact, I know this sounds absurd, if the breakdown supports that notion then it would be better to have corporate PACs and such donate even more money. It would be, in effect, a self-elected progressive tax.
Posted by: MIguy | June 8, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
No question that Obama has gained the nomination with his campaign tactics and by outspending more than 3:1 his opponents. The problem with Obama’s campaign is that his supporters dismiss his lies and tend to shoot the messenger by calling them racist. In May 2008 – Obama told voters that he has campaigned in 57 states, with “one left to go” He also said he is against NAFTA and then voted a few months ago to expand NAFTA. His campaign ads and materials, and his supporters have propagandized and misrepresented his opponents positions and facts. Obama has been ineffective in Illinois in getting anything done; and has been mislead into trusting folks like Rezko, Wright, Ayers – it’s unlikely that he will change.
Posted by: Jessica | June 8, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
We have a Senate/Congress
There will never be Black/White/Asian/Hispanic/Native American Power.
I honestly believe America’s not ready for an AA president nor a women.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 8, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
In-fighting was key to the downfall. While Hillary’s team was eating each other alive. Barack was polishing off his caucus strategy.
I can’t believe why folks want to pin this on the media. I guarantee you if Barack’s team was at each other’s throat the media would reacted the same.
Posted by: Omentum | June 8, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Senator Obama message of change is the following:
1. Politics like corrupt Chicago & Illinois
2. Socialism instead of a democratic state.
3. Or maybe marxism and communism.
4. Blacks are the Chosen People.
Remember folks he did not say his church teachings were wrong. He simply did not want the media and publlic to know about them. Obama is so power hungry, I keep wondering who his next
victim will be. Maybe the good ole USA
Posted by: Mary | June 8, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Robert can you rationally explain your reasons for punishing the DNC and voting for McCain.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
So when will be stop discussing Clinton the woman is out of the race but ABC is still finding issues to write stories about her.
Kind of strange is it not when you have this historical win by a AA and all the media could find time to talk about is Hillary, guess the media is not really impressed by their chosen winner after all
Posted by: SJ | June 8, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Roxanne: Please take a look over your last couple posts and ask yourself if the candidate you support would agree with what you are saying. Although there are many thoughtful people on here, there are some just trying to antagonize the rest. Best is to ignore them and/or refute the claim simply by something your preferred candidate has said/done.
Posted by: MIguy | June 8, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Mark Penn is correct that “one” factor in Hillary’s loss was due to “money”. She was outspent by the Obama campaign by nearly 3:1 or 4:1. The DNC candidates had signed a pledge to not let money influence the campaign, but the DNC then chose to look the otehr way and ignore the Obama campaign hugely outspending his opponents. Obama’s larger campaign rallies were preceded by entertainment venues to attract young people. Her campaign staff seemed oblivious to recognize the strength of his financial supporters like Oprah, Rezko, Ayers, Wright, and the financial industry. Dean told us before the primaries that he wanted a new and different candidate. Maybe because of Dean, Pelosi and the DNC we will finally get a viable 3rd party.
Posted by: Jon | June 8, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
I think that hillary could have had 3x money she still would have not won. Her stategy was flawed from day one. She said herself that it would all be over by super tuesday. She was right. It was over for her.
Posted by: Omentum | June 8, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Omentum, there are lots of republicans on here tonight aren’t there. I guess the more the merrier. But it only means they are very scared of Obama.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
In the Trinty Church which is a Black Liberation Theology Church, the Blacks are the CHOSEN PEOPLE. Senator Obama belonged to and believed in that church for 20 years and supported it with thousands and thousands of dollars. The only reason he resigned his membership was for political reasons. He does not want Americans to know the true teachings of his church or have media scrutiny. He did not formally reject the teachings of this church for himself or his family.
Posted by: Mary | June 8, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Hillary was the favorite from day 1 and the presumptive nominee. That is why so many supers supported her from the get go. The DNC and the country saw Obama take this country by storm. He excited people. People finally had a choice for the democratic nominee. Hillary did nothing for me but of course I would have voted for her. Yes, we the people made a choice. Half of this country voted for Obama and half voted for Hillary. But neither one would get the nomination without the supers. You and many others may think he’s am empty suit and there are just as many who want something different than the Clintons. If Hillary had won the nomination and the white house I can just see her and Bill dusting off things and putting them back in their place. We can’t go back to the past. There are many Obama supporters out there. I just don’t see how you can blame this on the DNC.
Posted by: d | June 8, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Robert – I agree the best approach given the DNC’s lack of qualified experienced nominee is to vote Republican. Although Hillary advised her supporters at least 15 times in her exit speech to support Obama, most of her supporters will decide based on who is best qualified. McCain is truly better qualified and a more moderate candidate. I think McCain’s age and experience are a plus. Reagan was older when he was elected and most of our founder Presidents were much older based on longevity at the time they were elected. There is a reason for why most corporate boardrooms and executive positions are filled with older experienced teams and leaders.
Posted by: Jas | June 8, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
lisa d
They should be scared. They should be ashamed. Hillary was right. After what the Great Decider has done to this country, they should not even run anyone this year. The should just let us repair this country and they should just disappear till 2015
Posted by: Omentum | June 8, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Jas
Yes, and look how well that’s turned out. The stock market plunged 400 points on Friday and unemployment jumped to 5.5 percent!
Yes, the Republicans are doing a bang up job. We’re deep in debt with China and thanks to Bill Clinton the trade agreement is such that their imports are wide open while our exports to their country are limited. If you’re going to vote for those clowns at least try to be more informed!
Posted by: roxanne | June 8, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
@Jas: Depending on your source, the average age of CEOs ranges from late-40′s to mid-50′s. With rare exceptions, I think it doubtful that most Fortune 300 companies would be interested in a 72-year-old as their new CEO. That may be ageism, and it’s possible McCain is the exception, but the fact remains.
Posted by: MIguy | June 8, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Robert I think you are so wrong. But vote McCain if you want to punish the party. But in reality you are only punishing this country. The republicans favor the rich. At least Obama wants to raise taxes on the rich. I guess you love this economy. I don’t, I’m hurting but McCain won’t care since he will continue the Bush policy. I asked this from someone else on here and didn’t get a reply. So tell me are you better off than you were 4 years ago. If so, good for you. But I am not and most of this country isn’t either.
Posted by: lisa d | June 8, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Jas.
Thank you.Yes i agree with your
comments.McCain is very qualify to
be commander in chief of our armed
forces.
He’s a war hero,patriotic,mainstream
politician and represents our values
and traditions.
McCain ’08
Posted by: Robert | June 9, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Attentions McCain Supporters!
During his speech last Tuesday in New Orleans McCain chastised Bush for not getting down on the ground and seeing the damage first hand. What he didn’t tell you is that the reason Bush wasn’t there was because he was delivering a birthday cake to – that’s right JOHN MCCAIN. A few days later McCain went down to the Florida Everglades to give a speech on the environment. When he was asked by a reporter why he voted against a bill to clean up the Everglades she denied that he voted against it. One of his aids had to tell him that he had indeed voted against it. A couple of weeks ago, he stated that the troops in Iraq were down to pre-surge levels. When Obama stated that he was wrong he refused to admit it. When McCain was asked how many troops are currently in Iraq, he didn’t know that either. That’s when Obama said that anyone who is running for President of the United States shold know better.
DON’T TRY TO TELL US THAT THIS IDIOT IS MORE EXPERIENCED. HE’S JUST OLDER AND IT’S CLEARLY STARTING TO SHOW! I can’t wait for the debates. Obama is going to eat that old man’s lunch!
Posted by: roxanne | June 9, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Omentum, the republicans know they can’t beat Obama and that is
why they wanted Hillary as the nominee. I listen to Rush and Hannity and all the consevatives. They are in a tail spin and working overtime on this. But they hate McCain as well. This is a very interesting campaign year.
Posted by: lisa d | June 9, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Obama’s pastor was his mentor and best friend for over 20 years. The religion was Black liberation theology.
Obama said his religion is in all he does.
Obama has incited racism, he has used it against people, and used it to get votes.
Ayers the terrorist, is obama’s friend for 20 years, early on he worked with him on the wood board, then later with Acorn, then ABC. It was more than a neighbor.
Obama has blamed everyone for everything.
Hillary and McCain for the war.
Bush for the war, and everything wrong in the country and the world.
He blamed the government for everything.
Just like rev wright.
Anything happened Obama blamed someone.
constantly through his whole campaign.
Only thing Obama never took responsibility for anything at all.
Obama’s assests are running for an office, voting present, and speeches.
Now his new slogan is to save the world. Is the presidency a stepping stone for his next campaign to rule the world.
He threw his grandmother under the bus, I am sure he would throw the country under a bus to accomplish ruling the world.
He is the biggest National Security threat this country has at the moment.
It is past time to wake up America.
This is your country and your lives at stake here. You best think long and hard before putting it into the wrong hands.
How many times did Obama lie to the American People?
I am sure there is a least five you can come up with with out thinking to hard about it. The list is long and growing every day.
Posted by: seah | June 9, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
“Gov. Christine Todd Whitman and Rep. Heather Wilson, R-NM — saw sexism from the media and from superdelegates.” The glass ceiling still exists in the US. Black men had rights to own property and to vote long ago. Women only could vote since 1920 after Susan B Anthony’s dedicated 50-year battle for women’s rights. Gov Richardson was likely so deflated that he was beaten in the primary by a female that he withheld his endorsement from his friend and endorsed newcomer Obama. Obama’s campaign and the media have not treated Clinton with the same respect given male Dem contenders. We saw the same disrespectful treatment in Germany when Prime Minister Angela Merkel was elected. I’m not sure which country is best for women, anyone know?
Posted by: Sally | June 9, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Sally,
I ask, why do Clinton supporters blame Obama for the MSM coverages?
Posted by: Vanessa | June 9, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
seah you republican must be shaking in your boots. Old man McCain can’t possibly compete with Obama.
Posted by: erin | June 9, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Sally
Are you aware that 70% of the women who hold office in this country have done so through nepotisim of some kind? Either through the death of their husbands or seats held by their fathers?
I’d say that if your married to or related to a man who holds public office, you’re a shoe in!
Posted by: jeff | June 9, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Sally
Why didn’t we hear any of this when Senator Clinton was winning? All through 2006 she was basically basking in the glow of this coronation.
I think what Tim Russert said last week really sums it up. Back in April of 1992 when Bill Clinton won the primary – I can’t remember which state it was but Russert called the election over at that point. He said there was no way Gov Jerry Brown could catch up in delegates. Russert said that the Clinton people loved him and thought he was a mathamatical genius. On May 6th after Clinton narrowly won Indiana and Obama got a big win in North Carolina, Russert said “We now know who the democratic nominee was and the Clinton people went ballistic! Did Russert lose his math skills after April?
THE BLAME GAME IS BEST PLAYED WHILE LOOKING IN THE MIRROR!
Posted by: roxanne | June 9, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Vanessa, I saw the full Q&A venue you mention, and McCain had handled it pretty well, given it was asked by a female supporter of his, in a meeting a will all of his supporters. At this point, he was dearly trying not to p*ss off anyone. Yes, he could have chastised the woman for poorly wording her question and been more harsh with her. But Obama did worse. He did nothing to correct his supporters assumptions that he gave Hillary the half peace sign, and you overlooked Obama’s more outrageous behaviour. Check out the several youtubes on this, apparently he repeated his hand motions on several rally occassions to get a laugh at her expense.
Posted by: Callie | June 9, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
One would think that since their god, Obama was selected, his supporters like Roxanne would be happy instead of so disgruntled. Obama did not win the popular vote by 305,019 but was given the candidancy. Just a thought, was this the results affirmative action like Roxxane received her high-paying job at Merrill Lynch. Even bet she went to school with a fund just for AA, also affirmative action. Many states are now looking at their affirmative action laws knowing they are racist. But if Obama wins, he will triple them. A President for all Americans, Yea.
Posted by: Marla | June 9, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
I’m not a huge fan of affirmative action, but one thing Obama proposed is interesting: he has advocated affirmative action for the poor, regardless of race, and eliminating it for some of the rich (again, regardless of race). A non-racial affirmative action is an idea worth debating.
Posted by: MIguy | June 9, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Roxanne noted that “the stock market plunged 400 points on Friday and unemployment jumped to 5.5 percent! The markets react to news and events. This was possibly related reaction by the markets to the prospect of Obama winning the nomination and Hillary suspending her campaign. The market did not rejoice and send a good signal for his DNC selection as nominee.
Posted by: Jas | June 9, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Marla the popular vote doesn’t get you nominated. It’s the delegate count that does. And why are you picking on Roxanne. What did she do. You really need to get over this. Hillary is not the nominee. Obama won this with our votes.
Posted by: lisa d | June 9, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
What the market did on Friday is not too unexpected. Unemployment is on the rise and analysts predict oil prices will go up; so, many are betting that corporate profits will be down. So, if you are going to take your money out of the market, where are you going to put it? Oil futures and other commodities most likely. So this feeds the cycle.
Posted by: MIguy | June 9, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
I think anyone who looks objectively at the facts can see that Clinton’s problem was not the money. One very big problem was Mark Penn’s strategy and message. There were other mistakes too. And there were many things Obama did very well. But Penn was outdone by David Axelrod. Anybody can see that.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 9, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Jas
Actually Jas, Oil jumped from $127 dollars a barrell last week to $138. On Wednesday Goldman Sachs predicted that oil would jumped to $150 dollars a barrell by July 4th. There’s the real reason. Investors got nervous and began selling!
Posted by: roxanne | June 9, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Roxanne, are you asking why no root cause analysis was done about Hillary losing until now? There has already been much discussion on sexism and the plight of women. Remember Obama called Hillary a “whiner”. Hillary might have taken her candidacy to the DNC convention and worked all summer to get the supers into her corner, protested the caucus outcomes, which gave more delegates to Obama when the popular vote was for Hillary, and gotten Florida and Michigan seated like many suspected would eventually happen sooner rather than later or never -no thanks to Obama campaign.
Posted by: Sally | June 9, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
@hopesprings52: agree completely with you.
Posted by: MIguy | June 9, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Sally, Pew Charitable Trust – who is the only watchdog beholden to no one – found the opposite. Since February, when Clinton decided to go negative (I hope against her own judgement) media coverage has been overwhelmingly negative against Obama.
Back to the PP article. Mark Penn kept his day job as worldwide CEO of Burson Marsteller all though the Clinton campaign, which he ran into the ground. Why doesn’t he offer to retire her $10 million debt to him? He has plenty of money and all he did was cause her a world of hurt.
Posted by: Mara | June 9, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Roxanne, Investors got nervous and began selling! Actually because the big news event was that Obama was the nominee. Recall the Reagan republican years of stock prices rises.
Posted by: Jas | June 9, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
@Jas: Although it is generally held that the market drops in anticipation of a Democrat becoming President, this does not hold true for just receiving the nomination. Unless the market is thinking his election as President is a foregone conclusion – and that is by no means certain.
No, the problem is nobody is really sure how hard the recession will be. The numbers are looking like it will be bad, so corporate profits will be down. Usually bonds/commodities go up at times like this and that’s what we’re seeing.
Posted by: MIguy | June 9, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
Clinton’s campaign debt is
30 million. She owes Penn
4.5 million dollars.
The whole Clinton team
along with her is a
bunch of sad sacks.
Posted by: anon | June 9, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
“Old white men have ruled this nation since its founding fathers.”
So how did Warren Harding do?
He was black … our first genuine black president (aside from Clinton who was granted that title solely on the basis of love!)
Oops!
“Warren Harding is widely considered the worst President in American history. Financial impropriety was rampant …”
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news!
But at least you’ve already HAD a black president.
Hillary Clinton was the better candidate but you done her in!
Unfortunately, in so doing, you also done the Dems in.
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY!!!
Posted by: QUESTIONER | June 9, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Clinton Fans,
Hillary didn’t lose because of “the money.” Unless you want to say how the money in her campaign (which she is ultimately responsible for) was wasted and squandered away…
She lost for many reasons:
1) Lying – she could never tell the truth about anything… Bosnia, Irish Peace, Clinton math, etc., etc.
2) Billy – That guy was completely out of control, and made most of us think how horrible it would have been to have “the Clintons” and all their drama back in the white house again…
What rubs me is what the media won’t say about this loser. And that is the complete and total reason for her “comeback” towards the end was Pandering!
Hillary and Bill would promise everything to everyone! From voting rights in Guam and Puerto Rico, to gas tax holidays. etc., etc. Whomever she was standing in front of she was promising the world too!! That and promising in the end to “bring back the ’90′s” and the good times, that was her final message…
That is the only reason why she did so well in the last few primaries period.
Maybe someday someone in the media will step up to the plate and tell the truth!
Heck if it wasn’t for Hillary being Bills wife, she would have never stood a chance period! What a do nothing woman Senator from NY, that qualifies you to be president? Without Bill campaigning for her she would have been out early on…
Now because of all these women she has mesmerized, everyone feels like they need to be nice to her, handle her with kid gloves, what a joke!
Obama can win on his own (and has), and his biggest mistake will be if he bows to pressure to put her on the ticket. He needs someone with integrity, not someone with a “has been” husband and a bunch of pandering lies for VP.
Those Clinton(s) are DONE!!!
Posted by: Davis | June 9, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
Voters need to read the five part article by Evelyn Pringle called “Curtain Time of Obama.” It has a total of about 60 pages written in the last few weeks giving detailed information about the Rezko and associates ties in the criminal case. Obama’s name is more than just mentioned. In fact another trial starts for Rezko in February. This article can be found on the net. I thought it was interesting with criminal minds working together. Now, I understand why Obama had people hanging around the courthouse. The FBI mole said that Rezko and Obama———.
Posted by: Mary | June 9, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Warren Harding was the first black president? There were only “rumors” that a distant ancestor may have been black. In an era of genetics, we should all realize that we’re not that different (or separated) from each other anyway.
Oh, and by the way, he was a Republican.
Posted by: MIguy | June 9, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
>>>
MIguy | Jun 9, 2008 1:20:49 AM:
Naah!
Harding was actually a Democrat who switched to the Republicans because the DNC was damaged even way back then!
(Just kidding ;-) )
But he IS considered to be the first Black President,
Posted by: QUESTIONER | June 9, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
“Obama can win on his own (and has)”, ..
but only if he cheats!
Posted by: eyes wide open | June 9, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
I supported Hillary Clinton for President. As an independent voter I find both the Democratic and Republican parties lacking. All this talk of unity for the Democrats takes away from voters making an intelligent choice based on the candidates themselves.
I see Obama as a mirror image of George Bush. Both have father issues that led to poor decisions/associations. Bush ran on being a uniter not a divider saying the problem was with the Washington insiders. Obama says the same thing. Bush was naive in invading Iraq and Obama is naive in his willingness to meet with the likes of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Bush attracted the far right of his party. Obama attracts the far left of his party. Just as the Bush presidency has been a disaster so would an Obama presidency at best.
Obama is passive-aggressive; he uses misdirection and is duplicitous on an Orwellian level. Obama would be dangerous as president. While there are many issues on which I disagree with McCain I will support him putting my own self interests aside for the greater good of the country.
Posted by: mimi5 | June 9, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Hooray for Questioner. Some people on this blog has hate so deep, so profound, it is indeed sad. But if they did not have it, could they even get through their day. The hate is energy for them.
When I started researching Barack Obama in December there were about 3 million lies listed under his name. Tonight, I noticed 36,900,000 listed-12 times the December number. He has really been busy. He wants the Presidency really bad.
Posted by: Mary | June 9, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
What really turned me off with Hillary was her lack of a cohesive foreign policy. I mean she makes a corkscrew landing into Bosnia dodging sniper bullets all the while. Then she ducks into a hangar as she waits for transportation, still dodging sniper fire. Her biggest error is that the only backup she had was her then 12-year-old daughter, a comedian and a guitar player. Where in the world was the sax player?
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
If Hillary couldn’t even manage her campaign finances, how in the world could she be expected to manage a country.
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
Good nite!
Posted by: eyes wide open | June 9, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
i really do not get it-how can obama supporters still be spewing all this hatred toward hillary at this point? i mean obama is the presumptive nominee you ought to be delighted.
what are you guys going to do with all this hatred after the election cycle is over? this is insane and precisely the reason their is no reason on earth i would ever support obama. if this is change i want nothing to do with it.
Posted by: sonia trevino | June 9, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
even though i voted for hillary i am honest enough to admit that it was a democratic majority congress and democratic majority senate that has led this country into this mess. gwb did not cause this mess by himself. so please stop with the fear mongering about republicans.
Posted by: sonia trevino | June 9, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
I think this whole thing is getting out of hand.
Vote for Mc Cain, or Vote for Obama.
Stay home or vote for some third candidate like Nadar .
But whining and moaning about it all doesnt make much difference.
Posted by: tomdavie | June 9, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am
Obama cannot and will not win without Hillary’s 18 million supporters. Well, that’s too bad. He should have thought about that this when his camp paid the media to keep bashing her head in even after she lost due to his racist and sexist tactics. Now he thinks he is going to use her to make him president? He’s going to be damned if he put her on his VP ticket and damned if he doesn’t because her supporters are joining to fix his ass. We are going to show him that 2008 was not his time to run. He should have stepped aside until
2012 or 20016. God does not like ugly. And Obama have some ugly ways about him and what the Dem.Delegation did is just as ugly to make him nominee when he did not earn it. We are going to stay home or vote for McCain or anybody else in November. And those who do decide to cave-in and vote for Obama we hope it will not be enough to get him over–unless the voting machines are rigged. So even if Hillary’s name is still on the ballot don’t pull her lever because that vote will be rolled
over to Obama. Hopefully, what
President Carter said about an Obama-Hillary ticket is right. It would be a disaster anyway.
case-in-point
Posted by: case | June 9, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am
I would rather 4 more years of Bush than Obama and that is saying something.
The Democratic party will get what it deserves in November!
Posted by: Mark | June 9, 2008, 4:20 am 4:20 am
“I intend to campaign hard through February. As you know, it’s the DELEGATES who determine our nominee. I believe I will have the majority of pledged delegate by the end of the races in February”
-Hillary Clinton Dec ’07
THAT ABOUT SUMS IT UP DOESN’T IT?
Posted by: The Reason | June 9, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am
Doing an post analyses on Hillary’s campaign is senseless given that the DNC elite left-wing party bosses, media, African Americans and Obama’s Chicago style campaigners highjacked the Primaries and caucases. The superdelegates were bought out by Obama’s campaign. No matter how many primaries Hillary was going to win, the superdelegates were going to vote counter to the will of the voters.
Posted by: kim | June 9, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am
Mark…if you vote for McCain YOU will get what YOU deserve…and everyone else for being so stupid! I bet you voted for Bush his second term…
Posted by: newvoter | June 9, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
I visit a lot of political sites and for reasons I don’t understand, this one contains some of the nastiest, most ill-informed comments I see. Everyone’s entitled to an opinion but it should be based on some knowledge of the subject at hand. Some of you should think before you type and stop confusing vitriol with conversation.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | June 9, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
2012…we won’t have any country worth saving in 2012…if McCain is in office. WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!
Posted by: truthtell | June 9, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
telltruth – I agree that we should all be treated equally. I don’t think an analysis of where Senator Clinton’s campaign went wrong is vile. I think that calling Senator Obama a Muslim and a racist is (particularly because it’s not true). As for opportunistic…what successful politician isn’t to some degree?
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | June 9, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Hillary lost for many reasons but the biggest two were…
wrong message (which the right president for the right time needs to get
and
Mark Penn’s screw up with California (as the strategy offcier of the campaign thinking it was winner take all was the biggest blunder in this whole campaign) and subsequent inability and lack of time to correct it.
If Hillary people want to blame anyone…blame the candidate being a bad manager herself and hiring bad managers…not her opponent …who in the entire American history of politics was incredibly gracious to her and chose a higher road (than even she did).
Politicians can become like overblown fat corporations which get overincumbered and rest on their laurels and own press…that is what Hillary and her campaign did.
Posted by: dl | June 9, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
and for tho9se saying they will vote for McCain did you see his surrogates this morning who keep bringing up the same things which have no substance
that they will keep the “tax cuts” of Bush …you know because it worked so well for Bush
and they will cut 18 cents off the gas prices but your bridges and roads will take a severe hit…so next time you hit that pot hole or have to pay a higher state tax because the federal government took away their infrastructure funds and your car is ruined after the roads get worse and worse…
and again you drop everything on your kids futures…Kick that can and let your kids figure it out down the road…
all so Mccain can get elected.
and then they talk about “retRAINING THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE LOST THEIR JOBS BY SAYING “WE NEED TO RETRAIN AND TRAIN THEM” as if that is HOW they are going to retrain tehm…
so exactly how are you going to “retrain” all of these workers …because you have nothing budgeted for that …even close.
It is disgusting they can get up and keep pandering t9 the people who are in such a hard situation that need to hear truth and they are not giving it to them…they are giving the same bush soundbites that put us here.
Posted by: dl | June 9, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Thats why I do not want to hear people mentioning “Experience”.
A person (leader) can have all experience to run even a small Office, but once that person has in the Team, people who do not qualify to give the support required. The outcome is always a catastrophy.
This is exactly what had happened in Hillary’s Support Team!
Posted by: Peace | June 9, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Sonia Trevino, most people bashing clinton here are not Obama true supporters. Have noticed that already myself. Most are Republicans posing as democrats. DO NOT BE FOOLED.
Posted by: vuzous | June 9, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Hate to be a party pooper for Obama supporters, oh what am i saying!!
Hilary won the popular vote, which then the dems by their own words should of given her the nomination, since in 2000 they cried and said the popular vote should win. and that the electoral college was too confusing!! Well guess what the electoral college is not confusing, but the dems want to make it confusing!!
The reason Hilary did not win is because she is a female and Obama is a Black Male, in the Dem party the race card trumps the gendar card!!
So far Obama has called everyone that did not vote for him a racist – See comments in San Francisco in front of his elitest billionaire friends.
A vote for Obama is a vote for the destruction of the United States, his plans will take away our liberty, increase gas prices to a point no one could drive, except his billionaire friends!!
Food prices will soar so all you will have to eat is crumbs.
Oh thats right he said this is what we should be like like, see his speech- America should not be driving SUV,s or big cars, and we should eat more simplier because Europe looks at us for this!!
Obama the Stalinist Marxist who like a Queen of England tells the people to eat cake!! (oh thats right he wants them to starve, no cake)
Posted by: spock | June 9, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Responding to JRS from yesterday, @ 7:17:06 PM
You, sir (or madam), are a liar. And I am SICK AND TIRED of you and your ilk posting the same crap over and over, putting your dishonest spin on everything trying to pass it off as fact.
Senator Barack Obama DID NOT play any type of race card, and just because you keep saying it doesn’t make it true. If you want to vote for McCain, then do so….but don’t keep perpetuating the same lie in order to do it.
Your continuous, deceitful attempt to make it sound like Bill Clinton dedicated his life to nothing BUT helping black people, puhleeeze….give me a break! THAT is the biggest fairytale than anything else you have muttered.
FoxNews found 3 or 4 snippets of Jeremiah Wright’s controversial comments from preaching over 36 years….36 YEARS, and it is extremely disingenuous for you to call this former marine and minister who has helped the poor, no matter what race, a racist, and state all he did was spew racism and hate for 20 yrs. Again, if you don’t want to vote for Senator Obama, then don’t. But stop with the lies and distortions of his life’s work.
Senator Obama attended this church and stated, unequivocally, that these snippets, the 30 second, taken out of context soundbites of sermons were not….REPEAT….WERE NOT the typical Sunday sermon.
So find another bs reason not to vote for him, and leave all the spin, the lies and distortions, to obsessed with Obama hannity.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | June 9, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
spock, you too are a liar.
Senator Obama called NO ONE a racist.
Apparently, the only way for you guys to make yourselves feel better is to LIE.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | June 9, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
dl – you say that the Bush cuts did not work, i love liberal propaganda – the Bush cuts increased the exempt status from 14500 to 20000, it lowered taxes for everyone that pays, for example if the tax cuts were to expire, a family of 4 making 50000 a year will see an increase of 3000 dollars a year in taxes, yes 3 Thousand dollar increase. and then add the trillions of dollars that Obama wants to spend on top of that, the average family or individual is looking at for every dollar they make 80 cents will go to the Government.
In NJ we pay gas tax, tolls like no tomorrow, and what do we get for it on the roads, pot holes everywhere, traffic jams. OK so it is up to the states to fix their roads, you pay for it in the gas tax also, and other taxes, property being one!!
The Bush Tax cuts as a statement of fact brought in MORE revenue to the Federal Government then ever before, why is that , because it allowed more people to work!! thus more income going out!!
But again are you one of those libs that does not pay taxes, because it seems a lot are coming out of the wood work!!
By the way you can always pay more voluntarily, just send them a check!! Do push on us to pay more!!
Oh thats right Libs are generous with the middle classes money but not their own!!!
A vote for Obama is a Vote for the End of Liberty!!
Posted by: spock | June 9, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
The nice thing about a republic is we don’t need a reason to vote against Obama. We just do it.
In a race where the center has evaporated and neither the left nor right have offered substance, one needs no defense nor must offer any reason for the vote. Just vote.
Posted by: len | June 9, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Even before Iowa and a single vote had been cast, Drudge Report was running stories asking “Is Hillary finished?”. After she bounced back in New Hampshire TV reporters were saying “Hillary just won’t go away”. The media wanted her out and sent up a daily barrage against her from the start until they got her farewell speech. Brokaw is right – the media has to look at itself and ask exactly why Hillary was given this unprecedented treatment!! The media played a huge role in creating a wave for Obama and shutting down Hillary. Why?
Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 9, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Isn’t it funny….they call Obama ‘elitist’….
When this man ran for the Senate he had holes in his shoes and two suits….raising two girls and paying off their school loans….
For those not educated enough to understand….when you have school loan debt, that means no one gave you money, you had to do it on your own.
His money came from writing his two books….best sellers.
Yeah, I can see how that would make you an elitist.
The republicans are shaking in their boots.
Posted by: LA in Indiana | June 9, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
lol spock, come back with some HONEST discussion.
Right now all you’re using are republican talking points….
Posted by: LA in Indiana | June 9, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
@LA: It’s the audacity to hope that at some point in this campaign we’ll get a straight story from Obama that he doesn’t have to walk back from a week later.
Speeches aren’t enough. Hope is what you have when you don’t have a plan.
Posted by: len | June 9, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
So you call grandparents making sure their grandchild had the best education they could provide, elite?
A single parent trying to raise a child, and on food stamps….that would be elite? That is what you call privilege?
When you take out student loans to go to school, you call that privilege??
Posted by: LA in Indiana | June 9, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
In Michigan, write-in votes are counted ONLY if that write-in candidate gives permission to the state to count them. If not, those votes are disqualified.
Posted by: Mary, MI | June 9, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
oh my len….you too??
lol all you guys have to do is READ, just a little.
Stop listening to sean hannity and read for yourself, research for yourself.
Speeches aren’t enough, eh?! Research to find out all that Senator Obama HAS done, and stop with the lies and distortions.
RESEARCH and READ you’ll feel better
Posted by: LA in Indiana | June 9, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
spock, I call you a liar when you lie. Most of what you state regarding Senator Obama is a distortion or a lie. All you have to do is read to find the truth, not some spin that someone else stated. It’s just THAT simple!
I’m still waiting for Obama’s ‘racist’ quotes from you spock. When did he call anyone a racist??
Posted by: LA in Indiana | June 9, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
RE: Trinity Church…if Obama only wanted political expediency he would have thrown the Rev, the church and it’s members under the bus when the first video surfaced. He did not. When the storm/Rev got worse, he (rightly) then seperated himself from the Rev. Then, when the Father video was played, he was than forced to remove himself from the entire church. That showed character to do what he felt was right…but for your HATE mongers, there was no Wright answer. You just want to HATE the man and his message. May God help all of you.
Posted by: Shar | June 9, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Jeff wrote:
I’m supporting McCain to send a message to the DNC….
————————–
Hats off, and I’m sure the 4000 soldiers who will return home in body bags during the mccain administration will thank you, too.
Posted by: cindy | June 9, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Oppressed people have an
absolute and incontrovertible
right to destroy their
oppressors by all means fair
and foul until the oppressors
end their ways and adopt the
theology of reason, civility,
fairness and mutual
accommodation.
Posted by: anon | June 9, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Answer me this….what has Hillary done besides sleep next to Bill in the White House?? Exactly what “experience” does she really have….what foreign policy credetials does she have….besides Bosina of course, and voting for the war without reading the report?? She’s an opportunist, a liar and morally corrupt.
Posted by: Shar | June 9, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Shar, first let me say that I do not hate Sen. Obama. I respect his right to believe in whatever he wants. Having said that…
The Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright has admitted that his preaching has been based, in part, on the works of the “recognized pioneer” of Black Liberation Theology, James Cone. The following excerpts are quotes from James Cone:
“Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.”
“There is no use for a God who loves white oppressors the same as oppressed blacks. We have had too much of white love, the love that tells blacks to turn the other cheek and go the second mile.”
“Black hatred is the black man’s strong aversion to white society. No black man living in white America can escape it… While it is true that blacks do hate whites, black hatred is not racism.”
You tell me, is that preaching unity between White America and Black America? Is it pro-America to preach destroying White America? This is the theology in which Sen. Obama has financially supported for 20 years. This is the theology in which Sen. Obama has raised his children. Do you honestly believe that Sen. Obama does not espouse these same beliefs? Don’t get me wrong! Sen. Obama HAS THE RIGHT to espouse these beliefs. But the question is: Do you want the President of the United States of America wanting to destroy White America? HOW is THAT going to unify the country?
Posted by: James Danley | June 9, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
NoMcSAME, I am curious! When you called Spock a liar, were you referring to his comments about the Bush tax cuts? If so, Spock is actually right on the money.
The Liberal mantra has been that the Bush tax cuts were for the rich. Yet, President Bush’s 2001 tax cuts lowered the bottom two federal income tax rates: The 15% bracket became 10%, and the 28% bracket became 15%.
Another Liberal mantra is that the rich don’t pay their fair share! That is a total myth. The top 25% of the nation’s wage earners actually account for 86% of the total federal income tax revenue! The top 50% of the nation’s wage earners account for 97% of the total federal income tax revenue. In 2006 the median household income was $48,000. So that means those households — 50% of the nation’s households — that are making less than $48,000, cumulatively, are burdened with only having to account for just THREE PERCENT of the total federal income tax revenue. Now THAT IS THE TRUTH!
Posted by: James Danley | June 9, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
LA in Indiana – My posting keeps disappearing
So you have not given any reason to vote for Obama, you just attack anyone that disagrees with you like Obama, someone brings up facts about Obama and you say it is taking out of context or misconstrued
But when Obama was in San Francisco talking to his elitist Billionaire friends of which William Ayers was part of – He stated this – “So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, and they cling to guns, or religion, or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them”
A racist is someone that has antipathy toward people who aren’t like them so thus he did call people racists!!
His mentor preached Racist items and Obama only disavowed the Pastored after the Pastor insinuated that Obama was a Liar because he is a politician!!
So give me facts that say differnetly.
On another note Obama signed on to the Bill that would of added another 1.50 tax to a gallon of gas!!
Yes he is fopr the poor just as he was for the poor in Chicago when he gave money to the slumlord Rezko!!
What a man!!
Posted by: spock | June 9, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
More than 55% of the democrats are women and still people claim that the sexism palyed a role in Hillary’s loss. I guess it is just an excuse to whine. She lost inspite of her name recognistion because she is not liklable and has no real qualities to become a president.
Posted by: rosetee | June 9, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
I disagree with Penn about the money. During her comeback in March, she took Texas, Ohio, and Rhode Island having only about half the money at 30 million of the Obama campaign. It looks like her Achilles Heel was with the caucusing delegates, where Obama managed managed to upstage her. Some of that upstaging was highly manipulative, and some of it could simply be attributed to better and advanced preparation.
Posted by: katrina | June 9, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Face it. Hillary’s real disappointment is that she stayed with a man who cheated on her (even while she was home!) and continues to cheat…all so that she could one day be president. That is truly where that “grint” comes from…I’d be pissed too if I were her!
Posted by: shar | June 9, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
I am not going to vote Obama. He certainly does not qualified to be my president.
Posted by: lindy | June 9, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
JUST HEARD ON CNN:
JENNIFER FLOWERS AND PAULA JONES ARE COLLABORATING ON A BOOK ABOUT BILL. WOULDN’T THAT BE EXTRA “BAGGAGE” IF HILLARY WAS VP?
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
IF YOU LIKE THIS ECONOMY, LIKE THIS NEVER-ENDING WAR, LIKE PAYING HIGH GAS PRICES, LIKE THE TAX BREAKS FOR THE RICH, IF YOU CAN’T WAIT TO INVADE IRAN, IF YOU LIKE THE UNFAIR TRADE POLICIES THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SHIPPING OUR JOBS OVERSEAS, IF YOU LIKE THE LOSS OF THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, IF YOU LIKE ILLEGAL WIRETAPS, IF YOU LOOK FORWARD TO THE OVERTURNING OF ROE V. WADE. IF YOU LIKE THE FACT THAT THE US IS ONE OF THE MOST REVILED NATIONS ON THE PLANET, THEN YOU’LL JUST LOVE McCAIN.
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Bill and his team (Penn) really fouled up Hillary’s campaign. They thought they could Bill’s junkyard dog style of politics against a fellow Democrat, and I am sure to their dismay it ended up being Obama who the public likes! Bill clearly didn’t recognize it’s not 1992. There were moments for HRC, such as the closing in the TX debate … if she were like that who knows? But that’s the thing, if you are not like “anything”, if you constantly shift around to try and maximize the opinion voters have of you based on polls (come on we see everything now it just looks schizo) and most of all you can’t control your campaign, no way should you be in charge of the country.
Posted by: Lanny Davis | June 9, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Who are people putting their hard earned cash on (lower is better):
6:00p EDT
Bet On: Who will be the next president of the United States?
John McCain +130
Barack Obama -170
Vote on who will win the 2008 Presidential election. Any wagers placed after outcome becomes public knowledge will be no action. Singles Only. Max. $50.
Posted by: White Blue Collar Better | June 9, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Rhbate, if you:
Like an unemployment rate of 7.0% or higher and the free market decimated;
Like pulling our troops out of Iraq in six months only to have the troops return to the Middle East within a two years;
Like paying $6-$8 per gallon of gasoline;
Like a massive tax hike for the wealthy, but also a huge tax hike for the lower to middle income earners when the current tax cuts are allowed to expire;
Can’t wait for Iran to be invaded by Iran forcing our troops back into the Middle East after having just pulled them out;
Like protectionism;
Like the federal government no longer trying to intercept communications by the terrorists, and allowing them to plan their next series of attacks on the US unimpeded;
Like the Judicial Branch making laws (when the U.S. Constitution clearly states only the Legislative Branch has that authority);
Want the world to love America no matter the cost, sacrifice and consequences;
Then you will love Sen. Obama as President of the United States.
Posted by: James Danley | June 9, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
I think McCain is a little out of touch. Today he said he intends to campaign in all thirteen colonies.
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Sorry, I meant Iraq invaded by Iran
Posted by: James Danley | June 9, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Rhbate, Sen. McCain also said: “We will use the telegraph key, the carrier pigeon, and the pony,” At least he remembers our history. Of course he ought to, he lived through it all!!!! Age does have it’s advantages, you don’t have to rely on text books filled with re-written history.
Posted by: James Danley | June 9, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Posted by: James Danley | Jun 9, 2008 5:05:40 PM
Our unemployment rate will soon be above 7% if things continue as they are now going.
I live in Los Angeles and I pay $4.69 for gas now and is on the way up. It’s kinda weird: As McCain said, we invaded Iraq for oil. Since then, oil has gone from $29.00 a barrel to $129.00 a barrel.
I have no idea what you mean by Iran invading Iran. Sounds idiotic to me.
Would love to live in a country that does not send it jobs and technical expertise overseas.
Would love a tax hike for those making more than $250,000. Most people pay a greater rate hike than these people.
Would love to travel the world without feeling compelled to hide my citizenship.
Would love to live in a country where we regain Habeas Corpus.
Would love to live in a country that does not spy on its own citizen.
Would love to live in a country whose government does not condone torture.
Would love to live a country where the Judiciary FOLLOWS the law, and does not elect president.
Would love to live in a country that respects the Constitution of the US, with particular respect to the Fourth Amendment restriction on illegal searches and seizures.
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Hope is what you have when you don’t have a plan.
Posted by: len | Jun 9, 2008 10:54:34 AM
____________________
Hillary had great plans!
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Posted by: rhbate | Jun 9, 2008 5:45:18 PM
rhbate, a “plan” is worthless if you can’t get it done because you operate with a sledgehammer…hummm?? think maybe that’s why she couldn’t get healthcare appoved when Billy was in office??
Hope is what you have when many are inspired to do something….using skill, intellect and diploymacy.
Posted by: Shar | June 9, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
rhbate, a “plan” is worthless if you can’t get it done because you operate with a sledgehammer…hummm?? think maybe that’s why she couldn’t get healthcare appoved when Billy was in office??
Hope is what you have when many are inspired to do something….using skill, intellect and diploymacy.
__________________
I totally agree!
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Do you want the President of the United States of America wanting to destroy White America? HOW is THAT going to unify the country?
_____________________
Nothing of what you right is attributable to Obama. I think this is what is known as guilt be association. You conclusion that Obama wants to destroy white America is pure demagoguery.
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Do you want the President of the United States of America wanting to destroy White America? HOW is THAT going to unify the country?
_____________________
Nothing of what you write is attributable to Obama. I think this is what is known as guilt be association. You conclusion that Obama wants to destroy white America is pure demagoguery.
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Hillary’s campaign is now over 32 million in debt. Many of the people she owes are caterers, small vendors, photographers, event promoters, etc. These are the small people, the “HARD WORKING AMERICANS-her core constituents”. I just wonder if she going to stiff them. She has a ton of money; if she wanted, she could pay it out of her own money and still have a fortune left over.
Posted by: rhbate | June 9, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Rhbate:
Spying & Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment states:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
American citizens are protected against “unreasonable” searches and seizures. It does not say “all” searches and seizures. Therefore, this amendment implies that there is a such a thing as a reasonable search and a reasonable seizure that does not require a warrant. What could be more reasonable than to search and seize communications between the enemy abroad and anyone here at home?
The Judiciary (specifically the U. S. Supreme Court): The U. S. Supreme Court did not elect George W. Bush President in 2000. The people of Florida did. The Florida State Supreme Court attempted to change the election rules and law. The U. S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that the Florida State Supreme Court errored when it allowed different methods for counting the chads. The U. S. Supreme Court also ruled that the Florida State Supreme Court could not change the Florida law regarding the date for certifying the election. Since the state was not going to be able to complete a full-state recount in time, the ruling meant that the recount had to be terminated. Had VP Al Gore requested the full-state recount from the very beginning, we could have had an official recount. Instead, VP Al Gore chose chose to cherry-pick a handful of counties that were overwhelmingly Democratic. Finally, several organizations did complete the full-state recount and determined that George W. Bush ended up with more votes.
Torture: The United States official policy does not condone torture. However, the President of the United States has the authority grant exceptions for extra ordinary circumstances. Waterboarding was performed on THREE of the detainees. And information critical in the governments efforts to understand the inner-workings of al Qaeda and preventing further attacks was obtained through this procedure. It is ironic that the anti-war protesters waterboard hundreds of individuals during nearly every anti-war demonstration.
Posted by: James Danley | June 10, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm