McCain: On Some Issues ‘Obama’s Word Cannot Be Trusted’
ABC News’s Bret Hovell reports: At a fundraiser tonight in Louisville, Ky., Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said that the word of his opponent for the White House, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., "cannot be trusted."
"You know, this election is about trust, and trusting people’s word" McCain told a crowd of donors to his campaign. "And unfortunately, apparently, on several items, Sen. Obama’s word cannot be trusted."
McCain’s remark came at the conclusion of a number of examples of what McCain said were Obama’s changes in position. McCain cited a proposal that he and Obama appear together at town hall meetings -– which Obama originally seemed to be in favor of, but has not agreed to yet -– and Obama’s reversal on whether or not to take federal financing for his campaign as signs that Obama’s word could not be trusted.
"So there are stark differences between Senator Obama and myself on a broad variety of issues," McCain said.
McCain has frequently mentioned his desire for the campaign with Obama to be "respectful," but has been ramping up more personal attacks on Obama in recent weeks.
The fundraising event in Louisville raised $2 million for McCain’s campaign, according to the chairwoman of his Kentucky finance committee, who announced the number when she was introducing McCain.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
I dispise McCains position on illegal alien amnesty but Obama clearly has a credibility problem. I could not trust Obama as our leader and hope you will not either. Use extreme caution when voting this November if you are thinking you would vote for an inconsistant and elusive and unproven and amateurish Obama.
Posted by: Bill | June 28, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
McCain’s BIG-TALK is border lining on actually being insulting to the millions of people who believe in the national vision of change. The GOP have not only ruined our economy, but their war of aggression against Iraq has sent off a chain reaction that has destabilized the world and its economy, and THAT folks is what has brought upon you the high gas prices. It is at best a LEFT-HANDED way of bringing about a much needed change in our nations transportation infrastructure dependencies.
Posted by: RW | June 28, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Amazing, Mr. Twisted Story McCain talks about being the truth teller. People who live in glass houses should not be throwing stones. Lets begin with the one cited in the article, “McCain has frequently mentioned his desire for the campaign with Obama to be “respectful,” but has been ramping up more personal attacks on Obama in recent weeks.” Desperate people do desperate things!!!
Posted by: Lou R | June 28, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
Amazing, Mr. Twisted Story McCain talks about being the truth teller. People who live in glass houses should not be throwing stones. Lets begin with the one cited in the article, “McCain has frequently mentioned his desire for the campaign with Obama to be “respectful,” but has been ramping up more personal attacks on Obama in recent weeks.” Desperate people do desperate things!!!
Posted by: Lou R | June 28, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
And it has begun. Did Obama really think he could get away with lying and flip flopping right before our eyes? As a dem I’m really worried about the upcoming election. I have changed my tune and hope he picks Hillary as VP. They sure look and sound good together.
Posted by: Bea | June 28, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
John McCain has changed his positions on major issues so many times recently it’s getting hard to keep track of where he stands on things. He was against the Bush tax cuts before he was for them. He was against offshore drilling before he was for it. He seems to be modifying his positions on immigration now also. He seemed to support privitazation for Social Security at one time. I honestly don’t know where he is with that anymore. I could care less about the town hall meetings. The concept originated from the McCain campaign anyway. Further, I prefer small donors funding a political campaign. I don’t like the idea that my tax dollars are helping to fund Mr. McCain’s campaign.
Posted by: mary | June 28, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
A Republican saying a Democrat’s words cannot be trusted! We ARE talking about a guy here who said last year Americans can walk freely in Baghdad, from a party that has lied so consistently about Obama that he has to devote a whole website to refuting their lies, the party that took us into Iraq for those WMDs. Where are they John?
Posted by: Martin Lee | June 28, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Time to take the gloves off, Obama. Go after the old coot
Posted by: Ted Mors | June 28, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Obama supporters couldn’t care less about Obama’s positions or opinions. They support him because they support him. He lied when said he would take debates, he lied when he said he would take public financing, and he is suddenly now for the 2nd amendment. None of it matters. He could drop his pants and fart in to the mike and leave, and his supporters would cheer. They don’t care if he has no integrity. Integrity is irrelevant.
Posted by: PortlandBob | June 28, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
when obama is entering white house next year all he has to do is walk in backwards—and mccain will be yelling see itold you i won he is leaving
Posted by: rodney | June 28, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
McCain is simply confused.
Posted by: Cole | June 28, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Obama is really one of the most progressive leader we ever seen in recent history. Regardless of the way the politics need to be played to win this election he is a man to be trusted for the big job in this planet & nothing will stop him to achieve that.
Posted by: Devo | June 28, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Except for a handful that does not include McCain, Republicans have lost their credibility. When most leaders in a party are willing to mislead a nation into war can we really trust them on any other issue? We were gullible and were taken advantage of to the hilt. McCain does not deserve our vote. Neither does the majority of the Republican party.
Posted by: worldsam | June 28, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
i still think cheney should take mccain quail hunting—only repubs would shoot each other.
Posted by: rodney | June 28, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
My friend John’s words are the ones that cannot be trusted. He has supported GW in tax issues regarding protecting the rich, went back on his words regarding immigration and has vowed to keep us in Iraq for another 100 years. Now tell us my friend, what about your own words, deeds and actions that are ALL totally untrustworthy!!!!
Posted by: Sareena Jones | June 28, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
McCain and the rest of the Senate Republicans decided to side with health insurance lobbyists the other night. Indeed, actions do speak louder than words.
Posted by: doc | June 28, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Mccain has his faults but I would not trust Barack Obama to lead this country. It would be naive and risky to put our trust in someone we know so little about. Hillary or Mccain!!
Posted by: JULIE | June 28, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
doc
there goes our pay checks again—-wonder how much the payoff—–
Posted by: rodney | June 28, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
julie you have no problem siding with the devil
Posted by: rodney | June 28, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
I do not believe posters are really serious when they say “we don’t know about Obama” so don’t vote for him.
If you don’t know about him, then you haven’t been paying attention. Learn about him and if you don’t like him then that’s fine, but advertising your ignorance is silly. Plus, for those of us who know where McCain (currently) stands it is a very unconvincing argument.
Posted by: doc | June 28, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
48,800,000 do you realize how rediculas that is—–he has not lived that long.
Posted by: rodney | June 28, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Rodney, you have a problem with a war hero who loves his country passionately?
Posted by: JULIE | June 28, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
rodney,
It is beyond belief what is going on. I’m actually fairly conservative and do not trust politicians (right or left) generally, especially on health issues. But in the economy that we’re in, with people struggling just to pay gas to come in for their visits, to continue to be servants of the health insurance lobbyists is about as uncompassionate as it gets.
Posted by: doc | June 28, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Senator Obama is a very far left radical taking over the Democratic Party. No wonder 80% of Clinton voters are switching to McCain or will not vote at all. The Democratic Party has no credibility at all now that a socialist is pulling the strings. America is not ready to become a socialist/communist nation and that is what Obama means by CHANGE. Obama thinks we should nationalize the oil companies, pay for food stamps and housing for those who choose not to work and let in any and every immigrant, illegal or otherwise. He does not care about America’s tradional values. He thinks everything needs to be changed.
Posted by: Mary | June 28, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
JULIE,
It’s “our” country by the way, not just yours.
Posted by: doc | June 28, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Opa – most of these posts are made by McCain supporters. They choose to slander Obama by making it look like they are Hillary supporters. Same crapola for quite awhile.
Posted by: Sally | June 28, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Mary,
Resorting to untruths does not help your argument.
Posted by: doc | June 28, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
doc—-if we put an end to the ambulance chasing lawyers–and the frivilous lawsuits healthcare would be cut in half—but public has a problem with the lore of getting something for nothing—i see many of these people every day—-and the fools do not realize that they are and will pay the bill
Posted by: rodney | June 28, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Senator McCain is going to lose. Trust that.
Posted by: Nobodys fool | June 28, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Senator Obama is a man of great vision and will make a great president. Because he is a leader he does just follow what others think he should follow. Senator McCain wants him to follow his directions in debate format and campaign financing, but Senator Obama is a leader and makes decision best for his campaign. I believe he will be a great president that will move our great country forward in the right direction. I my opinion he can be trust and will keep his promise to the american people.
Posted by: greg barnes | June 28, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Obama is too risky. We don’t know him and what we’ve seen about his shifting positions tells us he has a character problem.
He’ll lose in November. People won’t vote for someone they can’t trust.
Posted by: bromfield22 | June 28, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
doc–and the lawyers plus insurance companies get a whole lot richer—-it is like a runaway train—-and we the people pay all the costs
Posted by: rodney | June 28, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Look at what Obama did for Chicago – NOTHING! It’s slums are worse than before. McCain has made Arizona one of the best states to live in, businesses are moving there from other states. People are employed and enjoying the fruits of their labor! McCain’s past is very, very credible and accomplished. Obama’s is full of lies and self-serving speeches, nothing more.
Posted by: Mad in Michigan | June 28, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Sally, it turns out, seems absolutely correct. The mindless posters who do not argue any particular position of Senator Obama’s but rather choose to deceive have taken over this blog.
I hope they keep it up, it only hurts McCain more and shows their cynicism towards the intelligence of Americans.
Posted by: doc | June 28, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Look at what Obama did for Chicago – NOTHING! It’s slums are worse than before. McCain has made Arizona one of the best states to live in, businesses are moving there from other states. People are employed and enjoying the fruits of their labor! McCain’s past is very, very credible and accomplished. Obama’s is full of lies and self-serving speeches, nothing more.
Posted by: Mad in Michigan | June 28, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I hope that americans who are unsure or have formed a negative opinion of Senator Obama will read his book “Audacity of Hope” they will find that Senator Obama is a compassionate and brillant man, who cares deeply about the people of america. If they examine his positions and policy for themselves, I belieive that they will conclude he is the best choice for america and can be trusted to keep his promises to the american people.
Posted by: greg | June 28, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
georgia—he wants to take a few vietnamese with him—very interesting
Posted by: rodney | June 28, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
obama flip flops more than a boat full of fish, he is an empty suit, with no experience, no real jobs, no nothing, except taking handouts because of affirmative action, free college, free law school, free everything, he deserves because he is better than the TWP, right, guess who is not voting for him, the TWP by the millions,
Posted by: stan | June 28, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Out of of all the battles McCain could fight with Obama – “truthiness” (to quote John Stewart) should not be one of them. I actually liked McCain years ago before he became Bush the Third but HIS flip-flopping turned me off years ago. I don’t know yet how I feel about Obama but I do know McCain doesn’t have a leg to stand on with this argument.
Posted by: allie | June 28, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
It’s funny that McCain is questioning someone else’s word…he can’t even remember what his own positions are. Is he for amnesty, or against it? Is he for NAFTA, or against it? Is he for off shore drilling, or against it? Is he for the Bush tax cuts, or against them? Etc…
John McCain is one of the least principled politicians in the last ten years…and that’s pretty astounding!
Posted by: seanm | June 28, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
You want to talk about credibility McCain? Seriously??
Let’s see outside of the flip-flops that you have had due to PRESSURE FROM YOUR PARTY.
Keating 5 comes to mind and oh, breaking tonight, maybe you should pay your taxes on your house like other Americans.
Posted by: Chris | June 28, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Vote Republican: Lose all will to live!!!
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 28, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
McCain DIDN’T KNOW he had to pay taxes? Move on folks. Nothing to see here.
Posted by: Ted Mors | June 28, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
I do agree with McCain on this. Since Obama has very little record to go on, the integrity of his word is of critical importance. If he gets elected president it will be too late to examine whether his campaign promises and commitments are genuine or just “what a politician says”.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 28, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
McCain is a Marxist he reminds me of Stalin. I’m from Mars. I’ve been in the US for several months now. Not yet a citizen but when I vote in the fall. Do not vote for Obama. Vote for McCain. He reminds me of the great leader we had on Mars.
Posted by: Russian | June 28, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Mad in Michigan – Sorry, but Arizona has one of the highest foreclosure rates in the country and given McCain’s stance against earmarks one could say he’s done absolutely NOTHING for the state of Arizona. He was also influential in getting a EUROPEAN aircraft maker an influential contract against Boeing, the only AMERICAN aircraft maker.
Posted by: grob | June 28, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
quote…I hope that americans who are unsure or have formed a negative opinion of Senator Obama will read his book “Audacity of Hope” they will find that Senator Obama is a compassionate and brillant man, who cares deeply about the people of america. If they examine his positions and policy for themselves, I belieive that they will conclude he is the best choice for america and can be trusted to keep his promises to the american people…..
.
He writes a lovely book; he reads a lovely speech. But words are not enough. It’s easy to speak words; it’s hard to actually do things. And he has no record. You can’t vote “Present” when you’re the President.
Posted by: Charlie35 | June 28, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Anyone else notice the faces on those people McCain has at his town hall meetings? They look like they just came from a driving education class and will lose their license for 6 mons if they don’t go.
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 28, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
100 million dollars and you can’t pay your taxes. Sheesh!
Posted by: grob | June 28, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
No doubt Obama is a mesmerizing orator and is saying the right things to get elected, from my point of view. A man with little record and minimal experience will become the most powerful person on the planet and I’m not entirely sure what he will do when he becomes president. With no track record to go by he can appeal to a broad swath of folk but it does little to tell us how he will govern.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 28, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
hopesprings52,
It is not Obama or McCain you need fear, it’s all of the ‘hangers-on’ that are the problem. One man does not wield so much power. I do not care for zealots of either McCain or Obama, but it is clear that the current incarnation of John McCain sides with standard Republican partisans. Yes, Obama is a risk, but the alternative is unacceptable.
Posted by: doc | June 28, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Homer…I like that one. Republicans: Peace and prosperity are overrated.
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 28, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
this is coming from the guy who has reversed his position on the war, taxes, torture, health care, social security, campaign finance and education? Obama doesn’t want to follow your agenda and timetable on town halls and that is supposed to be a flip flop, you won’t commit to public financing nor negotiate its use and that is supposed to be his fault?
McCain, start debating Nader, you might have a chance against him.
Posted by: Louis | June 28, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
how many times has mcclown flip-flopped already? also, didn’t mccain once make a false confession and denounce america when he was a pow? mccain may be a former pow, but he’s currently a pos. lol
Posted by: Macaca McCain | June 28, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Mary: “Obama thinks we should nationalize the oil companies.”
Um, what? Where did you find that one? If you have an actual quote that even remotely suggests such a thing, I’d like to hear it.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 28, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
maybe Obama is afraid to debate a “crdible” canidate.
Posted by: Kim | June 28, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Mary: “Obama thinks we should let in any and every immigrant, illegal or otherwise.”
Obviously you can’t even think that one is true.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 28, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
buck—
Thanks, you just proved my point.
Posted by: Josh | June 28, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
McCain and Obama are both politician ..willing to say whatever they need to get your vote..but Obama is an empty suit and McCain is an American heroe..
Posted by: AC | June 28, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
AC – mccain is an american hero who once denouced america during wartime in front of tv cameras in a vietnamese pow camp. he has no character or honor.
Posted by: Brian Maslow | June 28, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
“buck” go back to calling yourself Mary
Posted by: Jack Petty | June 28, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
If people don;t smarten up, well have Obama as President and he will bankrupt this country, increase taxes on everyone over 75k, increase big government, and damage the security of the nation.
Posted by: jschm | June 28, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
jschm,
His plan is to raise taxes on $250k and up.
Posted by: doc | June 28, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Jschm: You have just described the Bush administration. HA HA
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 29, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
I think there is something wrong with those people who keep repeating that they know sooooo little about Obama. Not only are they themselves unknown quantities (I, for one, had never heard of them), but the reason they say it is clear – they are unable to drudge up any dirt on the Senator. And these people obviously do not read news papers – and they also scared stiff of the internet, because they definitely would get enough to chew on if they merely Googled his name!
Posted by: joe | June 29, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
jschm – oh stop with the fear mongering already. as far as i’m concerned, if you republicans didn’t want your taxes raised, you shouldn’t have started a war you can’t finish. time to pay the piper, dude.
Posted by: ace of hades | June 29, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Boy, do I have you Obama supporters splitting sweat and blood in favor of your corrupt candidate. It is hysterical that you all call me names amd a liar but will not/can not prove I made one inaccurate statement.
Go back and do your research from REALIABLE sources.
Posted by: Mary | June 29, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Hey there’s Mary!
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 29, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
Mary: Hannity,Rush,and Faux news are not reliable sources.
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 29, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Jackie – I’ll choose the candidate who doesn’t own 7 homes.
Edith – I’ll choose the candidate was was not born in Panama.
Posted by: doc | June 29, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
McCain is right. Obama is a total fake.
Posted by: Ryan | June 29, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
@humm: When do you want to declare victory? What criteria?
Posted by: MIguy | June 29, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
McCain, I live in Arizona and your word cannot be trusted either. You are both polticians and that says it all. Don’t be calling someone else something bad that you are more guilty of. The Pot calling the kettle black so to speak!
Posted by: eyeonyou | June 29, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Ryan, that tells us a lot about you and nothing about anyone else
Posted by: Nurse Betty | June 29, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Mary. You worked for WHICH political party with that grammar?
Posted by: Johnson | June 29, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
I can not vote for Mr. McCain. At one time I was planning to, but he called Pastor Hagee’s words crazy. How can any true Christian support anyone who called the words of Pastor John Hagee crazy? It appears Senator MaCain will do or say anything just to get elected, even say ugly things about the words of a great preacher. We can not trust a person like him to hold the top government office in the world.
Posted by: John | June 29, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
This coming froma man who has flipped and floped until near death and may have broken the law, let alone left a broken wife after cheating on her, KEATING 5, and now not paying his taxes. what a joke
Posted by: Johnson | June 29, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
If John McLame were elected, he would probably surrender to Vietnam and make another false confession. He is a traitor who cannot be trusted.
Posted by: april in paris | June 29, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
no ryan, that’s an opinion, not a fact. you really ought to learn the difference between the two if you expect reasonable and rational people to take your rabid outbursts seriously.
Posted by: ace of hades | June 29, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
What could be worse than McCain……McCain/noun..verb..9/11 Guiliani.
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 29, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Actually I am a retired professional who worked for a political party for 8 years and can see a fake from a hundred yards. Senator Obama is not a honest politician with a credible resume.
Posted by: Mary | Jun 29, 2008 12:09:53 AM
———————————
Your judgement is impaired, you voted twice for bush.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Rabid outburst??? You’re hilarious ace. Like I said, you know all when it comes to the people I’ve met. I’m sure they all know you by name. It is NOT an opinion you fool. Any RATIONAL person would admit that Obama is phoney.
McCain ’08
Posted by: Ryan | June 29, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
McCain forgot to pay taxes on one of his 7 homes. The Rovian elitist attack plan just went out the window.
Posted by: JR Idaho | June 29, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Ryan – did you know that Reagan and Nixon and Bush all Presided over massive expansions of the federal government that were actually larger than those of the Democratic Presidents that preceeded them? I guess that makes them all Communists, too. Your grasp of reality and facts seems about as tenuous as Mary’s.
Posted by: ace of hades | June 29, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
well i’m not surprised that you’re alone ryan. you seem like a very angry and lonely person lashing out at the world. get some help, kid. lol
Posted by: jillian coe | June 29, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
The u.s. government may stop Obama from viewing certain documents because his security clearance is in question. There is an investigation underway, as we speak. There is question if, in fact, he is a u.s. natural born citizen. This investigation should be complete in about 30 days.
Posted by: Julie in tampa | June 29, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
John McCain does not even know the price of gas now – and HE is going to run an economic plan for this country? He is so out of touch with every day Americans it is criminal to say the least.
Posted by: sandy | June 29, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Ryan, please answer my question – do you support the iraq war?
Posted by: Karl Hungus | June 29, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Yes, I do support the war. But only because we have no other option than to stick it out until their government can take over. I don’t think retreating is good at all. Anybody who thinks we can just get up and leave is WAYYY out of touch. You, like Obama seem to live in a fairy tale land.
Posted by: Ryan | June 29, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Hillary Clinton said that it was an honour to debate Barack Obama. Does McCain think it is an honor to debate Obama. We have not heard one single word complementing Obama. Whereas Obama has been gracious in his praise of McCain personally. Why does McCain want to debate Obama, so that he can attract attention for free. Right now McCain fails to inspire or get an enthusiastic response and out of desperation that his campaign has no momentum, he is making more personal attacks.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | June 29, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Obama is nothing but a politician promising the world and you all are falling for it. He’s nothing but a black Jimmy Carter. Maybe worse if that’s possible.
McCain ’08
Posted by: Ryan | June 29, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Lisa – tell it to the Amish. They even lobbied successfully to be exempt from Social Security. LOL
Posted by: Temagami | June 29, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
mccain switched positions on every major issue- print that fox, I mean abc
Posted by: evan thyme | June 29, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Krissy, you are truly unbelievable. I shouldn’t be surprised though. Liberal’s are pretty naive people. They don’t call them Liberal Elitists for nothing. You guys truly think you’re above everybody else.
McCain ’08
Posted by: Ryan | June 29, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
This issue has nothing to do with whether an individual is liberal or conservative. It has now been established that most Republicans were party to Cheney, Bush and the oil barons in misleading our country to fight an illegal war for oil. Those who love our country therefore cannot and should not vote for the party that betrayed our country. If McCain were honest he could have done what Chuck Hagel did. Instead McCain has proved to be an opportunist.
Posted by: worldsam | June 29, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Top Rank: Obama wants a pull out over 16 months…I think everyone wants that too.. I really don’t care what happens over there. I remember the Viet Nam war. What a waste of so many lives.
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 29, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Sandy, get a coffee, wake up, and do some research before you tell people to shut up. And I’m thinking if you look into things you’ll be changing to a McCain vote too. McCain is safe for patriotic people, I hope you are. Do you even know anyhing about how he wants to change freedom of speech. Wake up girl.
Posted by: LJ | June 29, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
They say the apple doesn’t far from the tree. Obama’s dad was/is (if he’s still alive) a complete dirtbag…..just sayin.
Posted by: Ryan | June 29, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
The movers and shakers in this country are mostly business types who took risks to start a business, employ people and created economic wealth for this nation. My guess is that most of the Obama people on this site are from the world of academia who are still somehow stuck in that world – the unreal world!! If Obama gets in you will know you are in the latter!!
Posted by: Temagami | June 29, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
Obama bloggers don’t seem to have the ability to discuss the issues with any amount of depth. Like Obama – like followers. They are really good at name calling, but not much else.
Posted by: Temagami | June 29, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
McCain has flipped more than a burger on a backyard grill.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | June 29, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Brian That would all be significant if the other candidate, Obama, wasn’t flip-flopping more in the past couple weeks then McCain has done in decades.
Obama is the “new politics” and “change” candidate remember? So his backing out of public financing when his campaign is committed to change and the spirit of public financing which is to lessen the influence of special interests on politicians- is a much bigger letdown.
He’s turned out to be just another “old politics” politician.
Posted by: alpaig | June 29, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Linda n carolina Agreed. Pelosi, Reid and Dean need to go. BOTH the Republicans and the ineffective , “we’re going to take on the Bush administration” Democrats, got us into this mess and BOTH should be held accountable.
Posted by: alpaig | June 29, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Remember, Obama is for “change”. Obama changes his mind, anytime, anywhere, on any subject.
Posted by: Jeff in hotlanta | June 29, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
They both flip flop from day to day. What a choice we have this November.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Do you remember the last canidate that was for change? Yes, Mr. Bush was that man, now the democrats want to prove they are just as stupid, as the republicans were the 2000 election.
Posted by: Ben in VA | June 29, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Obama, the democratic version of george “W”.
Posted by: barry | June 29, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Awake,
After he loses the election that can be his day job…lol
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
It has just been revealed that the Mccains have not been paying taxes on one of their properties for over three years. Talk about being rich and still not paying your taxes. They claimed it was forgetfulness. Is he that Old?
Posted by: vuzous | June 29, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
Nothing like a naive, undereducated redneck audience for McCain to spew lies to. Shame on him. McCain is the one who can’t be trusted…just listen to him laugh. He is truly disturbed.
Obama ’08!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: JC | June 29, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
***ashleigh–I like your quote.
“A taxpayer who would vote for Barack Obama is like a chicken who would vote for Colonel Sanders”.
Doesn’t Obama realize that many retired people are getting by on capital gains or dividends?
Posted by: Martin | June 29, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
Kevin And Obama’s voting for Cheney’s energy bill in 2005 is explained how? It’s the only tax cut Obama has ever voted for and wasn’t it nice it was for the oil industry?
Posted by: alpaig | June 29, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
Think for a moment if it was Obama who was evading taxes. The media would go off the hook covering the scandal. But McBush gets away with it. His wife gets away with stealing drugs. He gets away with tax evasion. It sounds like Fox version of fair and balanced.
Posted by: tom | June 29, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
You have to remember McCain has some mental instability, he tends to snap. This may not be good for someone who has his finger on the button. Several of his fellow conservatives have questioned his temper and stability. Moreover, can you really trust a man whose wife waited for him patiently only to have him leave her when he gets back from Vietnam? He talks about his morals on the battle field but he leaves his wife who suffered a serious car accident. Additionally his cover-up of his wife’s drug addiction. Do you really want someone who is popping pills as the first lady? This could potentially embarass the US if she were to relapse at a foreign event.
Posted by: greg | June 29, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
mccain is a convicted bribe taker and a confessed adulterer who’s flip-flopped on just about every position he once held – why should we take his warnings about obama’s trustworthiness seriously?
Posted by: Brian | June 29, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
kevin – great points! Thanks!!!!!
Posted by: sandy | June 29, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
kevin
All the money McCain earned from all the books he wrote gave to charity. He made 0 money.
McCain voted against Chaney Energy Bill, Obama Voted it.
McCain voted against Farm bill because it is giving corn based farmers billions and billions of dollars when the corn price is already too high, Obama voted.
McCain called Corn based ethonal is a fraud, Obama voted .
Please know the fact before you write.
Posted by: john | June 29, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Sandy You must be proud of the fact then that Obama stood on a podium in PA and said he wants to take us back to the foreign policy traditions of George Bush Sr and Ronald Reagan.
Posted by: alpaig | June 29, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
all you republicans whining about obama’s tax plan are deluding yourselves if you don’t think mccain is going to raise your taxes, too. we have to pay for bush’s war in iraq sometime, the bill from china is coming due very soon. did you think that we could just keep borrowing money from china forever and not pay it back? you republicans need to quit your whining – you wanted your war and now it’s time to pay for it. pony up, crybabies.
Posted by: doc z | June 29, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
can anyone believe this election as truth?obama represents the lesser of 2 evils,end of day they are merely puppets of a cloister of lies that amaericans are believing,sucking up to, and like lemmings are marching of with their ideal’s of patriotism,crazy stuff, i am exiling as we speak,lol,this country has screwed itself, history will reveal this, later taters
Posted by: ellis | June 29, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
They cut taxes for the rich, borrow from China. Not just the economy, look at the value of dollar. It is becoming useless. After another four years of republican rule, you might have to carry a sack full of dollars to the grocery store to buy a gallon of milk. They are running this place to the ground.
Posted by: tom | June 29, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
Merri. What tax increase? Do you have a job? Bush CUT my income taxes for which I am grateful. When taxes are cut, both personal and corporate, TAX REVENUES TO THE FED ACTUALLY INCREASE!! Lots of documentation here. Ireland recently decreased corporate taxes to the bone. The result was that business is booming, full employment and a projected 3-4 percent GNP increase for the next two years.
MCCAIN/ROMNEY 08
Posted by: Temagami | Jun 29, 2008 1:47:30 AM
444444444444444444444444444
What tax increase? You do know the cost of the Iraq war is being paid for with debt compounded by huge interest. That along with other debt will be paid for by generations of americans. Also the Iraq war has caused oil and gas prices to increase. Disruption of oil flow explains part of it.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
McCain has the wisdom that comes with age and experience. Unlike Obama, he has actual experience in the world political landscape. He also, unlike Obama has a record of reaching across party lines to get real things done.
He has proven his integrety, honesty, and commitment to the USA.
He is the only qualified candidate in the race.
McCain is the only choice to lead or nation…….
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Vera good point you r making, both Obama and his wife never knew any crap until now when he’s running for president.He just knew this, his wife first time adult life proud of her country, wow there are other things that they just now found out as well like we don’t have 57 states. That is the kind of change we need..ha..ha..ha JOKE!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: vegas | June 29, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Bottom line? Nobody can be trusted, including ABC News. Why is this not being reported as BIG NEWS and BREAKING?
Fortis is a large bank and insurer in the Netherlands and Belgium. It took over ABN Amro last year, together with RBS and another bank. Last Thursday, its share lost 17% because Fortis attracted foreign capital.
I was shocked when I read the following, which was brought out 4hours ago:
American ‘meltdown’ reason for money injection Fortis.
28th of June, 9:10
BRUSSELS/AMSTERDAM – Fortis expects a complete collapse of the US financial markets within a few days to weeks. That explains, according to Fortis, the series of interventions of last Thursday to retrieve € 8 billion. “We have been saved just in time. The situation in the US is much worse than we thought”, says Fortis chairman Maurice Lippens. Fortis expects bankruptcies amongst 6000 American banks which have a small coverage currently. But also Citigroup, General Motors, there is starting a complete meltdown in the US”
This fits in the picture, with the other press releases last week, like the short advise of Goldman Sachs and some other of the same messages last week.
Although gold has rallied a lot lost week: first thing monday morning: short Dow, long Gold?
Or will there be a rate cut, which undermines (delays) everything?
Original press release:
VOTRON BLIJFT AAN NA GOLF VAN KRITIEK
Amerikaanse ’meltdown’ reden geldinjectie Fortis
28 Jun 08, 09:10
door onze correspondent
BRUSSEL/AMSTERDAM (DFT) – Fortis rekent binnen enkele dagen tot weken op het volledig instorten van de Amerikaanse financiële markten. Dat verklaart volgens de bankverzekeraar de serie ingrepen van donderdag om zich met €8 miljard te versterken. „We zijn op het nippertje gereed. Het gaat in de Verenigde Staten veel slechter dan gedacht”, zegt Fortis-chairman Maurice Lippens, die volhoudt dat topman Votron aanblijft. Fortis verwacht faillissementen onder 6000 Amerikaanse banken die nu weinig dekking hebben. „Maar ook Citigroup, General Motors, er begint een complete meltdown in de VS.”
http://www.dft.nl/bedrijven/fortis/4…ie_Fortis.html
__________________
In Gold We Trust
Posted by: BigandBreaking | June 29, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Merri. What tax increase? Do you have a job? Bush CUT my income taxes for which I am grateful. When taxes are cut, both personal and corporate, TAX REVENUES TO THE FED ACTUALLY INCREASE!! Lots of documentation here. Ireland recently decreased corporate taxes to the bone. The result was that business is booming, full employment and a projected 3-4 percent GNP increase for the next two years.
MCCAIN/ROMNEY 08?????
Ok Let IRELAND PAY FOR THE IRAQ WAR FOR
JUST 4 YEARS AND SEE HOW THEY ARE DOING!
and then tell them they have to do it
for another 100 YEARS! just a Mcshame!
Posted by: Anita Yova | June 29, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Ashleigh: Obviously you are still living at home with mommy and daddy paying your way through this world.People have to earn our respect..when your president lies to the country about going to war..torture…spying on private citizens..ruining the economy…4,000 war dead etc. It’s kind of hard to respect that. Don’t even get me started on Cheney
Posted by: linda n carolina | June 29, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Martin. Trust me….most on this site don’t know what you are talking about when you mention “Capital Gains” For MANY,MANY of us seniors, Obama will burn us when he doubles the capital gains tax. These Obama bloggers have to be mostly kids who don’t have a clue about the laws of economics. Pitty.
Posted by: Temagami | June 29, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
Sandy, we will give you the love you need when you see the light and your detox is completed. Last time there was a world leader that acted like Obama, his name was Hateliar. Open your eyes and take a good look at the poster he had at his campaign desk and keep them open from there on. We cant have over 300 mil American under Obama the dictator. Will he let the protesters out of the cage when hes done humiliating them in Colorado?
Posted by: LJ | June 29, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
ALPAIGN — The Congressional Research Service, as well as every reliable newspaper, HAS ALREADY REPORTED THAT THE “BUSH CHENEY ENERGY BILL” ACTUALLY INCREASED THE TAXES ON OIL COMPANIES, AND THAT BY THE TIME Obama voted for FINAL PASSAGE, MANY of the Bush administration’s original proposals HAD BEEN STRIPPED OUT,
The Congressional Research Service calculated that the oil and gas industry LOST MORE TAX BREAKS THAN IT GAINED IN THE 2005 legislation, which resulted in a NET TAX INCREASE that Congressional Research Service put at $300 million INCREASE over an 11-year period.
Posted by: kim | June 29, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am
I just wanted it known that this “J” From PA did not post the comment at Jun 29, 2008 2:01:23 AM. I can’t stand either of these candidates!
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Merri paaallllllllllleeeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzz dude don’t embarrace yourself saying things that have no facts. I’m doing stocks followed internation economy every freakin day tick by tick and drop by drop of oil. NNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOO the war did not cause oil to go high and noooooo as far as I’m concerning I have not pay an extra dime of tax for any war dude. Oh matter of fact I’m still waiting for my $1500.00 from Mr. wonderfull Bush stim package.
Posted by: vegas | June 29, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am
ashleigh. Remember what I said about these Obama bloggers who cannot discuss issues with any depth? Only rude, crude and unrefined character attacks on those who disagree – get used to it. It says MORE about their character than yours.
Posted by: Temagami | June 29, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am
ALPAIGN — The Congressional Research Service, as well as every reliable newspaper, HAS ALREADY REPORTED THAT THE “BUSH CHENEY ENERGY BILL” ACTUALLY INCREASED THE TAXES ON OIL COMPANIES, AND THAT BY THE TIME Obama voted for FINAL PASSAGE, MANY of the Bush administration’s original proposals HAD BEEN STRIPPED OUT,
The Congressional Research Service calculated that the oil and gas industry LOST MORE TAX BREAKS THAN IT GAINED IN THE 2005 legislation, which resulted in a NET TAX INCREASE that Congressional Research Service put at $300 million TAX INCREASE over an 11-year period.
Posted by: kimK | June 29, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am
Kim And the Republicans voted for that bill for what reason? Obama broke ranks and voted with the Republicans on that bill and the Democrats voted against it- so am I to assume you think the Republicans had this one right?
Posted by: alpaig | June 29, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
IT IS DINOSAURS LIKE JOHN McCAIN WHO SAT AROUND IN WASHINGTON FOR DECADES WHO ARE THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROBLEMS WE ARE HAVING NOW IN THIS COUNTRY.
JOHN McCAIN SAT AROUND YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR VOTING AGAINST BILLS WHICH WERE AIMING TO FIND A SOLUTION TO THE OIL AND GAS CRISIS WE NOW FACE.
IT IS DINOSAURS LIKE JOHN McCAIN WHO SAT IN WASHINGTON FOR DECADES, AND DID NOTHING TO FIX OUR COUNTRY’S CRUMBLING INFRASTRUCTURE, WHICH HAS RESULTED IN OUR ROADS DECAYING, AND BUILDINGS, AND BRIDGES COLLAPSING, AND PEOPLE DYING.
IT IS DINOSAURS LIKE JOHN McCAIN WHO SAT AROUND IN WASHINGTON FOR DECADES WATCHING, AS MILLIONS, AND MILLIONS OF JOBS IN THIS COUNTRY WERE BEING OUTSOURCED TO MEXICO, INDIA, AND CHINA.
IT IS DINOSAURS LIKE JOHN McCAIN WHO SAW NO PROBLEMS WITH THE FACT THAT MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF AMERICANS WERE LOSING THEIR JOBS.
(John McCain has said out of his own mouth that “He is the BIGGEST FREETRADER EVER”)
THE ONLY THING JOHN McCAIN SEEMED TO DO SUCCESSFULLY FOR ALL THOSE DECADES HE WAS IN WASHINGTON WAS COLLECT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM LOBBYISTS TO LINE OWN POCKETS.
Posted by: kevin | June 29, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Obama’s word can’t be trusted, McCain’s plans are no good. It’s time to write-in Hillary Clinton and your choice for VP.
========================================
Hillary Clinton/Your Choice 2008
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | June 29, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
We dont need McCain, Obama is for Change, and we should all thank the good Lord that Obama did not got AIDS when he had gay sex with Larry Sinclair.
Posted by: Nancy | June 29, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
Ashliegh,
You are a very decerning young lady. You are absolutly right in your assessment of Obama. I’ve voted in eight presidential elections, and this Obama with his radical, racist circle of advisors in the scariest thing this country has ever seen in its politics.
We must have honesty, integrety, and proven leadership leading our nation.
McCain is that candidate.
Keep to message going out, hopefully you can help your fellow youth get a grip on reality.
Posted by: uolm | June 29, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
Teragami – I’ve been reading your posts and I’ve got to call you out. You’re such a hypocrite. All you do is post ad hominem attacks on Obama and his supporters and then whine when they do it to you. You don’t attempt to engage people on the issues at all, and when you do, you do so on the most laughable terms imaginable. You’re pathetic and an embarassment to McCain and his supporters – do us real Conservatives a favor and just shut up already, You make the rest of us look bad.
Posted by: Andy Gutterman | June 29, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
kimK – Thank you!
Posted by: sandy | June 29, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
alpaig — John McCain was not one of those Republicans who voted for that bill, he voted against it — so John McCain had this one wrong.
Posted by: kim | June 29, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
I can feel the love. Act your age Sheila.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Simple truth is Obama is HIDING from debates with McCain……Why? If he thinks he is all that – why be afraid?
Obama’s preaching like speeches are meaningless. He’s just saying what you want to hear according to the polls. All talk, no nothing new.
Posted by: alan harper | June 29, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
I doubt you will get any takers on the Obama capital gains tax issue since his plan doesn’t help any citizens, just puts more taxes in the government coffers.
It’s the same with his answer for high gas prices, just tax the companies that produce and deliver it to us, that should fix the situation.
Obama is out of touch on fixing the ecomony, and certainly, as has been said, on foreign policy and national security.
McCain, the best choice in 08
Posted by: eck | June 29, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am
They were due to fatigue, Martin (2:36 am). Unlike McCain, Obama actually works on weekends. So, he gets tired from time to time. I’m sure you do too.
Posted by: Doug | June 29, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
Martin – looks like you were right, no takers from Obamites on my Capital Gains pitch. Have a great evening – luck with these loons!! NITE!
Posted by: Temagami | June 29, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Both these candidates suck. Plain and simple. I am not sure which one is worse.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am
Steve,
The same reason they didn’t point things out in the primary. He’s the golden child of the media.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am
Here are some examples of flip flopings between Obama and Mccain that some of you in here are so obssessed to. Its very simple Mccain’s flip flop example is that he decided to wear green tie tomorrow but he ends up wearing red (big deal). Now here’s Obama’s flip flop example he married someone for 20 years and now say “I did not agreed with what you say or what your beleives are”.
Posted by: vegas | June 29, 2008, 4:02 am 4:02 am
hem, i like Obama’s
Posted by: Jaisy01 | June 29, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am
Bill, you’re pretty stupid if you’d trust McCain but not Obama. McCain has zero credibility and is identical to GW Bush on the failed policies of the last eight years. I never cease to be amazed at how downright dumber than dirt neo-cons are, who learn nothing from their own Republican failure and then go on to point out in judgmental scorn the supposed faults of the Democrat. Never cease to be amazed. Every neo-con needs to have their salary hit up to help pay for the mess they’ve made and they need to suffer more from this Republican-caused recession.
Posted by: Uncle_Hog | June 29, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am
and mcpain can be trusted! isnt he the guy who befriended charles keating of the savings and loan scandal that bankrupted many americans and cost the us tax payers billions. mcpain called this an error in judgement. what a fraud.
elect mccain for four more years of the same old pain
Posted by: marty | June 29, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am
McCain needs to shut up and go back to the senate. He is a complete fool and so is the dumb-fools that vote for him. He’s an old, one-step in the grave, worthless politician. And most of all a total liar. He’s got his nerve saying someone’s word is no good. I can’t wait until November 4 when we get the chance to finally show this old fool what the democrats can do. Watch and learn people it will be a landslide victory for Democrats this November!
Posted by: Bishop9109 | June 29, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am
The fundraising event in Louisville raised $2 million for McCain’s campaign, according to the chairwoman of his Kentucky finance committee, who announced the number when she was introducing McCain.
——————————
$2.0 million!!! Is that all?? Obama can easily raise of 50X that by holding an event of the net. Ordinary folks would send $10, $20, $50, etc.
Talk about trust – during the primaries and during the general elections, McCain has stated that he has seen the error of his ways and now supports only border control. Until that is acheived, then no other reform can be comtemplated. Yet in front of the Latino group, he says he favors immediate comprehensive illegal immigration control. Maybe he forgot people have memories? I used to trust McCain but do not do so now.
Posted by: Beto | June 29, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am
That really sums it up for me. The number one reason why I am not voting for Obama is he cannot be trusted.
Posted by: Tom | June 29, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am
Tom, if you trust the Republicans in general, or John McCain in particular, I have some beach front property in New Orleans to sell you.
Posted by: Johnson | June 29, 2008, 6:34 am 6:34 am
“COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY!”
And that’s EVERY REASON not to vote Republican
Posted by: John Revere | June 29, 2008, 6:35 am 6:35 am
“Flip flops”?
Isn’t that what they wear in the retirement home now?
Posted by: Dr Spock | June 29, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am
Mr. Obama just says what you want to hear.
Posted by: chris | June 29, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am
For McCain to talk about “trust” is complete hypocrisy. For the past seven years plus, McCain has shown that he is not trustworthy, and it just keeps getting worse. McCain is flawed to the core!
Posted by: Victor Shrenzel | June 29, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am
Obama and Hillary say: VOTE OBAMA
Posted by: Joe | June 29, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am
People…Do you hear what you are talking about>
Where are the discussions about the issues? What are the platforms on Healthcare, war, economy, debt?
Start thinking.
Posted by: edh | June 29, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am
On this particular point McCain is right. Obama has accurately depicted what the republicans like to accuse the democrats of being. This and global warming are about the only thing that McCain is right about.
Posted by: jan | June 29, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Yes, we do have choices and in this case of electing a president that can lead and protect our nation, there’s only one choice: McCain for PRESIDENT !!
He’s the only one that can be trusted with our best interests and our survival as a nation against the haters of the world that would like nothing better than to see us destroyed. Obama will destroy us.
Posted by: USCITIZENVETERAN | June 29, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
obama to save the world.
Posted by: Brooke | June 29, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Obama has to run now. He has been skirting issues, not taking hard firm stands, voting present for a reason. By not having a record to stand on, he doesn’t have to stand on anything. He is bascially a “clean” slate for the democratic hunchmen to manipulate, create, and pass off as a “New and Change” kind of candidate. Only the weak minded will fall for such a blatant home-made beauty queen. There is nothing there that has not been programmed by someone else – that is why he is afraid to debate McCain. McCain can do it on his own – Obama is a follower, not a leader.
Posted by: Dem for McCain | June 29, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
The GOP is going to lose so bad in Nov, they won’t know what hit them.
Posted by: JJ | June 29, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
If I had $5 for every time McCain has mentioned Obama’s name since he became the Republican nominee, I’d be rich! The only time Obama mentions McCain is when he is defending himself against something McCain has said negative about him. This is because McCain knows nothing about the economy or cares nothing about home foreclosures or gas prices. All he can do is bash Obama, whom McCain realizes is smarter than he is. Obama should just ignore his taunts and carry on his campaign as though McCain does not exist. As far as McCain’s policies go, he doesn’t exist to me. I am voting for Obama!
Posted by: Redphilly | June 29, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
McCain, pay your property taxes.
Posted by: Will | June 29, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am
Well dah, everyone knows that Obama cannot be trusted but some poeple chose to still follow him. This is not news.
Posted by: Whatchange | June 29, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
MqCain, is prenup not all about trust?
How do you expect oversee what is about the largest economy in the world, when, within your own household, the wife dearest cannot bring herself to trust you?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Dont be ridiculous Merry, McCain and Bush are polar opposites on a variety of major issues. Obama is alot more like Jimmy Carter than McCain is like Bush. You want to support a racist sexist, inexperienced ,Marxist ideologue, you go right ahead,,,, see where it gets you.
Posted by: Badger | June 29, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
McCain is so old he doesn’t remember what he has promised/said. Sen. Lieberman has had to correct him several times for misstatements he’s made. His bashing Obama only makes him look worse than he already is. Too bad the republicans can’t find another candidate. He’s a clone of GWB.
Posted by: Jane Guernsey | June 29, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Obama camp refuses to allow Muslim supporters a seat behind Obama in camera view??? How disgusting is that?. If it were McCain who had refused any racial, ethnic, religious group a seat.It would still be front page news today, and he would surely be cooked. Just another blatent double standard, that the liberal media, and DNC continues to practice.
Posted by: Badger | June 29, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
John McCain started taking credit for a GI Bill that passed that he adamantly opposed saying it would give troops too much incentive not to re-enlist. And as for saying Obama’s word not being trusted because he has committed to 10 town hall debates, Obama at best said it might be a good idea, but never committed to it. Why should Obama carry McCain and give him exposure?
Posted by: John | June 29, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
<>
Certainly true… but neither can McCain’s. They are BOTH politicians who have learned to say whatever people want to hear.
What either of these men say now will have little bearing on what they will do if elected.
Posted by: Rhys | June 29, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
McCain, is prenup not all about trust?
How do you expect to oversee what is about the largest economy in the world, when, within your own household economy, the wife dearest cannot bring herself to trust you?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
mary is just one of those repubs looking for attention—or perhaps one of those man women
Posted by: rodney | June 29, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Obama has poor voting records. How can voters trust the person who has poor voting record? In the election, voters should mark their votes as “Present”.
Posted by: Humm | June 29, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Obama kept his word to over 1.7 million donors who have contributed to his campaign. This is more important that John McCain’s attempt cut these voters out of this election cycle.
Posted by: Yeil Raven | June 29, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
McCain, is prenup not all about trust?
How do you expect to oversee what is about the largest economy in the world, when, within your own household economy, the wife dearest cannot bring herself to trust you?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
How can Obama be such a “uniter” when even Hillary supporters hate him? And he’s supposedly going to bring this country together? I don’t think so. That’s just another Obama lie.
Posted by: Pepsiholic | June 29, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
McCain, is prenup not all about trust?
How do you expect to oversee what is about the largest economy in the world, when, within your own household economy, the wife dearest cannot bring herself to trust you?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
The facts in a nutshell are the GOP don’t have a chance to win in Nov, it just isn’t going to happen. After the past 8 years there is no chance the american people are going along for the ride anymore. It isn’t going to happen people, just deal with it. I’d rather pay more taxes to fix this country then give my money to keep this stupid war going on.
Posted by: JJ | June 29, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
doc
when a guy like warren buffet is embarassed as to the taxes he pays—just maybe someone should listen—there is too much in too little hands and needs to change
Posted by: rodney | June 29, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Democrats are crazy. They have recipe for disaster. They will nominate anyone even if he has lil above the 50% blessing from thier own party and has new face. What is their strategy? Why they think they can win when Obama has challenge in his own party to win 50% of the voters.
Posted by: Humm | June 29, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
McInsane will do/say anything to win, he knows that due to his age, this is his last shot at it. Too bad he can’t see that it ain’t gonna happen.
Posted by: JJ | June 29, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Republicans have little experience with truth. Truth is not their strategy, fear is. McCain had been with Bush 95% of the time; someone who stole an election, illegally took us to war, has screwed the climate for the benefit of big oil and arrogantly continues to ignore the will of the people. How is McCain an expert on truth? You republicans that think your party runs a cleaner game then the democrats are delusional!
Posted by: Tom | June 29, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
McCain, is prenup not all about trust?
How do you expect to oversee what is about the largest economy in the world, when, within your own household economy, the wife dearest cannot bring herself to trust you?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Temagami,
There is not much to debate about the capital gains tax – Obama will raise it – the only question is by how much.
Posted by: doc | June 29, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
McInsane would be the only president in history to wear a life alert!!
Posted by: JJ | June 29, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
MaCain is the one that flip flops as well. I am glad that Obama changed his mind about public financing, just look what you people are doing to him now. Go vote for that old ass man if you want.
Posted by: Cyndeewi | June 29, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
McCain, is prenup not all about trust?
How do you expect to oversee what is about the largest economy in the world, when, within your own household economy, the wife dearest cannot bring herself to trust you?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Temagami,
Whether he can accomplish what he proposes is to be seen. Odds are that it would be increased over years as it would be nearly impossible to pass legislation otherwise.
Dividends are not capital gains; dividends would remain taxed at your current tax bracket.
Posted by: doc | June 29, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
obama is an Arrogant, Radical Fraud – and he is NOT qualified to lead our country. To the obama group – WHAT exactly are his positions – WHY should I vote for him???? Hillary Clinton is the best qualified for our country – McCain is a good 2nd choice – anybody but obama!
The obama group – just like him – is that reason enough to give him the position of President of the USA????
Posted by: Molly | June 29, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Hmmm, let’s see…the definition of capital gains is the profit made of the sale of something like real estate, stocks or bonds that was sold for more then the purchase price. So, with the exception of selling a home, I would guess that the majority of average working class people aren’t playing the stock market too often, and are more concerned with putting gas in the car and food on the table. This must leave those that make more money to worry about paying more taxes on the sale of their stocks and bonds and summer homes, etc…..sounds fair to me!
Posted by: JJ | June 29, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Hmmm, let’s see…the definition of capital gains is the profit made of the sale of something like real estate, stocks or bonds that was sold for more then the purchase price. So, with the exception of selling a home, I would guess that the majority of average working class people aren’t playing the stock market too often, and are more concerned with putting gas in the car and food on the table. This must leave those that make more money to worry about paying more taxes on the sale of their stocks and bonds and summer homes, etc…..sounds fair to me!
Posted by: JJ | June 29, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
humm
ALL OBAMA HAD TO DO IN OHIO WAS HAMMER HOME WHAT NAFTA AND CHINA TRADE HAS DONE TO THEM——-but then again that is slick willys legacy—–this is one place where whoever gets in office better at all costs get a grip on
Posted by: rodney | June 29, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
I certainly hope capital gains taxes are increased! It’s what made the 90s so successful and allowed the Dems to balance the budget… and still the rich got richer.
FYI… it will NOT affect anyone’s 401K — 401Ks are NOT not subject to capital gains taxes. that
Posted by: elee | June 29, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Ask Songbird McCain to release ALL his Military records up prove he didn’t give up the US pattern routes to the Vietnamese and cause 60% more downed aircraft after he was captured. Maybe it could explain why he wasn’t promoted, while he was held captive, when military policy is to advance captured pilots with their time in rank.
Posted by: Eric | June 29, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
bush got into an oil war to enrich his friends in the oil business and mcpain will continue it to enrich the defense contractors
Posted by: marty | June 29, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
michael
i am 70 get social security and work full time and still dont make 50,000 a year
Posted by: rodney | June 29, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Molly -
Nobody is giving Obama the position of President. He won the primary fair and square in spite of the nomination being a fait accompli for Hillary. And he will win the general election and Hillary’s die-hards will have proven nothing except that they invested their politics in the personality of one woman and not in any sense of what is right.
Posted by: gern | June 29, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Hysterical coming from a man who has flip-flopped 45 times in the past two months! I especially loved the flip-flop-flip on the GI bill. Though, I will acknowledge some disappointment with Obama on telecom immunity.
Posted by: segsig | June 29, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Badger,
Nice try…
Posted by: doc | June 29, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Nice try making it sound like only the wealthy have a concern on the capital gains tax. More than half of Americans have some type of retirement fund that is set up in a 401K, mutual funds, IRAs, etc. So for all of those middle class Americans, who are doing the right thing but putting away what they can for their retirement, plan on the taxes almost doubling on that. Don’t forget the equity in your homes also. For you hard efforts and sacrificing to buy them, maintaining and improving – Obama wants his fair share of your hard work. Who do you really think is going to pay for all of the social programs he is going to implement – the wealthy? Nope. The lower class – nope? It is going to be the hardworking middle class – you know, the group the democrats no longer represent. The dems only care about the latte drinking big city liberals, or the dependent Oliver Twists taht say “may I have some more, please?” The rest of us are just their means to make themselves feel good and “look good.” They have no desire to rock the boat on the working class, they have finally gotten us where they want us and they have no intention of changing a damn thing.
Posted by: Party of Elites | June 29, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Mary,
Where did you pull that “80% number from”. As of today about 55% of Hillary’s voters say they will vote for Obama and 23% say they will vote for McCain. I expect the number for Obama will continue to increase. If you don’t care about women’s issues, the war, the economy, health and a vision for the future, by all means vote for McCain. BTW, McCain has flipped flopped on so many issues, it’s becoming hard to keep track.
Posted by: Sabreen60 | June 29, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
INteresting that Mr Flip flop himself can try to attack anyone’s credibility.
Posted by: Nick | June 29, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Mary – Guess you haven’t read Scott McClellan’s book “What Happened” seems to me the biggest liar is running the White House, the one really put no value of human life – your life or that of anyone else. George W. Bush. No one can top that and that’s a fact and he has the job approval ratings to show it.
Posted by: vote4peace | June 29, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
That’s rich, Sen. McCain. You have flip-flopped on so many issues even you don;t know where you stand on some of this stuff anymore. I used to think you were a man of integrity, but seeing you violate all of your principles just to appease the right-wing has destroyed that image. After you lose, how will it feel knowing you did so while damaging your legacy and destroying any notion of your independence or sincerity?
You have thus far reversed position on tax cuts for the uber-rich, torture, oil-drilling, privatization of social security, your Iran policy, your Pakistan policy and health care. And Obama is the one we can’t trust?
Posted by: mike | June 29, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Mary: “If elected, he will take away all of your rights and all of your money.”
OK, now you are not even trying. LOL
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Come on guys. Did you Obama before Oprah introduce him to you? Nobody knew about him. Since we know lil about him we can only say he can do what others polititians were not able to do. I am still confused how can one man with only 50% of democrats blessing will be able to do what others polititains cannot. If that was so easy then anyone could have done it.
Posted by: Humm | June 29, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
There was no Al-Qaeda in Iraq until we went then and opened up the borders. Iran was a power but it was contained by Iraq. Saddam was a dictator with evil crazies related and working with him but his people didn’t live in the hell that exists now or over the past few years.
Aside from the over 4,000 dead and tens of thousands of US troops injured–let alone their “uninjured” relatives the flawed invasion has other costs.
One other example of the economic burden of the flawed invasion of Iraq. Our military presence in Iraq alone accounts for almost 10% of US consumption. Summarized from AP:
The U.S. consumes about 21 million of the world demand of 86 million barrels of oil per day.
The Defense Department is the nation’s single largest user of energy. At 1.6 million gallons a day in Iraq, the war alone accounts for over 7.6% of US demand. If we were to account for total military, let alone government usage we would be over 10% at least.
Getting out of Iraq would cut our consumption almost 10% and likely cut prices too. Iraq is guaranteed consumption at this point.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | June 29, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
ANYONE who does not make more than $2.8 million a year is being screwed by Bush’s tax cuts, I’m an accountant and see it all the time.
You’re not voting in your own best interests if you vote again for these tax cuts!
Posted by: Andrea D | June 29, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
It’s interesting the way Republicans always whine about taxes, but continue to place the real tax burden on the middle class, and relieve the Corporation of responsibilities.
If you don’t want high taxes, WHY OH WHY DID YOU START THIS UNENDING WAR IN IRAQ?
And by the way….what ever happened to “We will find the ones who did this (9/11) and they will pay?” I guess the Republicans thought if they waved something shiny in front of us (like a war in Iraq), we might be distracted. Well, it worked…..for a while.
No more. Not this time. Not this time!
Posted by: sedonakaren | June 29, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Humm – Yes, anyone who follows current events has known Obama for 4 years. I certainly know him a lot better than I know Oprah, who I never particularly liked.
Oh, and the NAFTA meeting, where Obama aides didn’t tell the Canadians what was alleged, took place in Chicago, not Canada.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Red foot,
You must be joking, right? Look at the economy when Clinton was in office and look at the economy over the last eight years under Bush and the Repubs. Obama has repeatedle said that he will NOT tax the middle class as the REPUBS are doing NOW. You would be more credible if you came here with facts instead of untruths about the Dems and saying anything without providing any sources what so ever. And just what social programs are you talking about? The old line thinking that the Repubs have tried to put off on the Dems won’t work. NOT THIS TIME!!! The American people are too smart and have become more political astute to buy the BS. BTW, if we stop spending $12 billion dollars a month on a war that we got into because of lies from Bush and the Repubs, the economy would not be in the tank and we will have money to try and improve our country. As it is our children and grandchildren will still be trying to pay off the debt we owe China to keep the war going. You do know that we have borrowed money from China to fund this war? Or has this fact also escaped you?
Posted by: Sabreen60 | June 29, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Badger: What do you have to say about someone who says he can’t remember if he used illegial drugs i.e. George W. Bush? At least Obama was honest enough to admit that he used in the past.
Posted by: vote4peace | June 29, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
ROMNEY??? LMAO, he did a lot for us here in MA….please temagmai, spend some more time looking for loopholes for your capital gains…
Posted by: JJ | June 29, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
If McCain is to be absolutely trusted to carry out what he has said he will do regarding Iraq, our liberties, SCOTUS etc, his word is a damn good reason to not vote for him.
Posted by: Julie | June 29, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Since the MSM seem to have a problem with direct speech, I’ll say it for them: Obama is a liar.
Posted by: free to speak | June 29, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
hell, obama SWORE he’d fillibuster FISA telecom immunity.
He PLEDGED to seat florida and michigan
Barry is a class A liar, just like bush!
Posted by: trettione | June 29, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Party of Elites, I take issue with the beginning of your statement: “Why is it acceptable to belittle McCain for his age while it is taboo to even mention Obama is a black man?” How can you compare a persons ethnicity with age? Most normal people know that getting old is normal. How come your type never mention the fact that….um he’s white. You sound those people who compare homosexuality with being black. As if being black is a state of being unnatural or cursed. Well, party of elites, people don’t turn black, they do get old, but we are all born of our parent’s exactly what our parent’s were. Your issue is not with the people but with the one that created them. Care to challenge Him on that one?
Posted by: Rational Voter | June 29, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Alex Trebek: For $2000 catagory (Politicians) He isnt good for much of anything else, but he can give a great speech……… Who is Barack Obama
Posted by: Badger | June 29, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
You can trust McCain. He will stand strong with his “100 more years in Iraq message”
Posted by: Tell Us More | June 29, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Rodney,
Under Obama’s plan, you will pay no income tax.
Temagami,
No dream because you cannot substantiate your claim.
Party of Elites,
Any middle class wage earner who has been doing the right thing by investing for his/her retirement should have no concerns whatever with Obama’s tax plan. Any decent, respectable investment advisor can show how to limit, if not eliminate, tax exposure for those who plan to live their retirement years on a middle-class income.
Examples: Roth IRAs are exempt from taxes upon withdrawal. Mutual funds converted to fixed-income funds are not subject to capital gains.
Posted by: Michael | June 29, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Doc,
Thanks for your thoughtful reply. You make good points.
I am also a physician and find myself targeted by Obama’s taxes. I can readily afford my home and childrens education now but, when I add up all of the new taxes I’ll be facing I will be forced to leave my home and make significant adjustments. We are so blessed by this great country that I am not angry about it, but I am anxious and nervous. My 2007 actual tax federal+state is 39.2% – that is what I pay after my deductions, as a percentage of my income. Mr. Obama’s plan will push it over 50%, and I cannot afford that and also keep my home and kids’ educational options. I agree that $137k is a lot of money to many people, but families making that kind of money drive Toyotas and have $400k nice houses in middle class neighborhoods. They are not driving mercedes and living on the country club. They struggle each year to pay their expenses. If Obama wishes to target the actual rich, why not make the high brackets at $650k gross as you suggest?
I guess my main point was that the problem with Bush was not Bush himself… it was Bush plus the same party in legislative power. The excesses of each party are held in check by the other party when the executive and legislative branches are in opposite hands. All forecasts indicate that the congress will be further to the left after this election cycle. If Obama is elected, certainly good ideas from the left will be passed; but also the inevitable bad baggage will also get rubberstamped and passed, never facing harsh scrutiny or oversight from the other side.
In a sense, a vote for Obama is a vote to continue Bush. By that, I mean is it a vote to continue the excesses and lack of balanced power and adversarial oversight that results when the executive and legislative are in opposite hands. The change I would like to see is a change to balanced power, where only the good plans from either side of the aisle pass through. That naturally occurs when the executive and legislative branches are in opposite hands. When one party controls both the legislative and executive for a long period, it leads to excesses (Bush 43; Carter) and national problems; when there is an adversarial relationship there tends to be greater accountability, and hence national progress and happiness (Clinton; Reagan). You can argue that we have such a balance right now, and in a sense you are right; Bush cannot pass controversial or right-wing agenda anymore, and congress cannot pass bad baggage legislation over a veto. However, there is too much animosity and we need a fresh face. McCain panders to the right just as Obama panders to the left during this election cycle, but in the end I expect either of them to govern as they have in the past. For McCain, that means a bipartisan spirit (McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Feingold, etc) to accomplish common sense tasks. In combination with a democratic congress, I am hopeful that we will see another period of economic expansion and best practice policies being crafted for this nation.
Posted by: Jake | June 29, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
What is Obama’s PLAN? Does he even HAVE a PLAN? I listen speeches and he addresses all the problems American people face. But, I want know how he is going to IMPLEMENT the PLAN he doesn’t have. Even on Gas prices, he doesn’t have anything immediate and is opposed to drilling offshore. McCain’s idea for off-shore drilling, while not the particular way I would go, is a plan. And that’s the difference. I don’t think Obama offers us anything real.
Posted by: bluebird | June 29, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Everybody talks about McCain’s age. I truly wonder if he suffers from PTSD after captivity in Viet Nam.
Didn’t you all read about that NVA jailer who said he would vote for him? Perhaps he knows McCain’s codeword that would turn him into the real Manchurian Candidate.
Forget the skin cancer, where’s McCain’s psychological evaluation?
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | June 29, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Only the COMPLETELY NAIVE believe that either one of these puppets have any integrity.
Posted by: TRUTH | June 29, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
To paraphrase an old GOP talking point: “I want to make the GOP small enough so I can take it to the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”
McCain is helping to make that possible. Let the guy rant…
Posted by: LKern | June 29, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Says the man who FAKED a visit to a Baghdad marketplace. He wore Kevlar UNDER his street clothes, and was guarded by 3 Blackhawks and surrounded by soldiers to demonstrate how “safe” it was to walk the streets.
Also the man who wrote “reform” campaign legislation with a custom-built loophole just for himself (or anybody whose wife has her own corporate jet).
Also the man who, though tortured himself, flip-flopped on banning torture, saying it was all right for non-US citizens! A WWII veteran I know said, “Doesn’t he get the idea of reciprocity?” Any future American POWs will be more likely to suffer the kinds of treatment we are handing out now.
Disgusting. I used to really like this man, but his desire to be president has ruined him.
Posted by: Mrs. Polly | June 29, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Rational Voter – boy did you outdo yourself. It is called age discrimination. It happens just like race discrimination and gender discrimination. Guess the dems are okay to pick and choose who it is okay to discriminate against and belittle. Where do they stand with the mentally handicapped – can we rip them apart, some weren’t born that way, they became that way. Let me know, I’m a little confused on who is fair game according to your standards.
Posted by: Party of Elites | June 29, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Goodmorning:
You are wrong. Do you really think a non-citizen would be allowed to run for president? You learn that in junior high school Civics class, my dear.
Why would they wait until he’s nearly won the election, you fool? Wouldn’t that have been kind of unfair to the other candidates in the Dem primary? THINK.
Posted by: sedonakaren | June 29, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
bluebird – The candidates have had their plans and policies plastered all over the place for more than a year, if you are not aware of them, that’s your own problem.
And McCain does not have a plan to lower gas prices in the near future either. No one does.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Even Obama’s supporters are coming to the conclusion that the guy can’t be trusted! He’s gone way beyond flip-flopping into the world of out and out lying. He’d just as soon abandon his followers as not — depending on how the political winds are blowing at the moment. Obama owes no allegiance to anyone except himself! His more mature followers are catching on.
Posted by: A | June 29, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
It is very important to acknowledge America is at a serious crossroads in terms of our direction for the future. We know JM path…it is simply the status quo. We as Americans know that this path is a short sighted and dangerous one. BO for all his faults is one leader who has stepped up to lay out a progressive vision to lift all citizens. We have endured government that cateredcto the needs of the first estate, CHANGE is the mantra most Americans agree with and BO is that change. If you are less informed, it is up to you to research and find out and put your petty partison issues aside for the sake of our future generations.
Posted by: SQR | June 29, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
A, gimme some facts.
Posted by: Rational Voter | June 29, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
How can you intrust your new wine to the weakness of an old wineskin?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
McCain is CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN… because he has a record to prove it.
Posted by: peter | June 29, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
yes you cannot trust Obama, that is the fact.
Posted by: word | June 29, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
What a relief. Now i’m sure I hit the nail-on-the-head, jj commented in the best way he knows how Thank you jj
Posted by: Marty | June 29, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
McCain can’t even stay within the law of his own campaign finance reform package. Every day he is breaking the law, as he is legally bound to only use public financing. What a slimebag… “Hey, don’t look at me! Look over here!”
Posted by: PatriotNW | June 29, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Your “McCain Flip-Flops” are a weak shot at his credibility. All of them are inconsequential, nit-picky items with most of them uncontextual because they don’t reflect the changing information and situations that resulted in changes of opinion. For instance, many people thought we did enough to fight terrorism prior to 9-11, and then afterwards, you can change your mind without being consider a “flip-flop.” It sad to think that most of America needs oversimplified concepts to gain a worldview. Whereas, Obama’s “flip-flops” are the direct result of convenience and preference without broadbased landscape alterations
Posted by: Shanika R | June 29, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Obama’s Plan is in the land of fairy tales and wishes. It all involves using tax dollars that we don’t have! I want to see plan that makes sense and that we can afford. I don’t care if it takes time to reach the goals. I have seen nothing like that from Obama. And, if he had all these great plans while in the Senate less than a whole term, then how come the democratic congress has done nothing to implement his big ideas? The DNC is responsible as the legislative body in power. And, they continue to do nothing.
Posted by: bluebird | June 29, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Mary: really it’s 80%? Where did you learn your math?
Posted by: The Unshrub | June 29, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Obama started off his quest for the nomination by citing the one anti-Iraq war speech he gave while running for office in the most liberal district in Illinois, thereby, attracting the left and anti-war activists, who became the grassroots of his campaign.
Then, he played the race card on Bill Clinton’s characterization of Obama’s anti Iraq war position as “fairy tale” to solidify the black vote behind him.
After he had the black vote behind him, he stood the NAACP meeting in New Orleans so as not to be seen as just another black candidate in order to win the white vote.
Then, we started to hear his shift in his foreign policy positions toward the center. The centrists in the democratic party easily forget what Obama stood for just the day before and the left and anti-war activists are too deft to hear Obama’s move toward the center. And the blacks can’t get past the color of their skin to see that Hillary has a 96% rating by the NAACP, better than any other on the Hill including Obama.
Now that he’s the Dem nominee, he’s beginning to sound more like a GOP candidate.
This man is an impostor and a fraud. VOTERS BEWARE!
Posted by: Yotin | June 29, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
The view here is that a lot of Americans Support Senator Obama because he is not McCain and obviously not a Republican. I support Senator Obama for a variety of reasons.
Posted by: maxdenn | June 29, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
barack obama said ” I’ll meet john mccain anywhere, anytime.”
now he is afraid to do town hall meetings, instead of the 3 traditional debates that are a joke. I’m telling you guys, this guy is nothing once you take away the speech or teleprompter. I don’t know why so many people fall for it, its like voting for a bumper sticker.
Posted by: john | June 29, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Everybody expects McCain to resort to dirty tactics and they aren’t surprised that he’s started.
Posted by: JR | June 29, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
When people just came out of a subprime scam, we don’t need sub-prime trust.. we need TRUTH. At least valid, consistent estimates.
I knew this camaigne would get ugly and looked forward to these gentlemen taking off the gloves instead of all this “yes we can” bs.
Posted by: zed | June 29, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Well Obama broke his word on the FISA bill, so it’s not like Johnny boy is completely wrong here.
Posted by: T | June 29, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Not consern with flip flops that dont impact my family and myself. now flip flops on war-4,000+ lives lost many more wounded, gas prices, jobs, health care, environment people these are important issues that we care about. let the repukes continue brining issues off lapel pins, pastors, liberal, and who knows what else, common Fix News what else do you have?
Posted by: jj666 | June 29, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
The Republicans know what’s about to happen, and they know why. And they should be ashamed.
Posted by: mcollier | June 29, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
You cannot entrust your new politics in an old politician, just as you cannot keep your new wine in an old wineskin.
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
McInsane won’t even get 30% of the vote come November.
Posted by: JJ | June 29, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Ray Jay,
I’m just pointing out more of Obama’s hypocrisy. While he woo’s the crowds with his talk of new politics, a different tone in Washiington, he authroizes his hack political operatives to try and destroy McCain. McCain is the only one with the actual EXPERIENCE of bringing both sides together to get things done. The record is clear. Obama has done NOTHING!
Posted by: Jim | June 29, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Mccain wants ten town hall meetings in a month. Like i said earlier, I understood from yesterday why Obama will only give him two. Mccain is dull and needs free advertising. After the elections, whoever wins will have to give speeches to congress, United nations and a host of others. I guees with Mccain, everyone will be sleeping before the speech is over.
Posted by: vuzous | June 29, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
I hope that McCain comes to the realization that the majority of Independent voters do NOT trust John McCain’s word on just about ALL of our important issues in this campaign.
Posted by: mary | June 29, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Jim – what’s funny is that you ignore the fact that McCain pledged to run an honorable campaign and not go negative… and now look at what he’s done. Kind of ironic, no? Meanwhile, Obama does have experience reaching across the aisle and building coalitions – which you conveniently ignore.
Posted by: RayJay | June 29, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
For someone who has changed their position on everything, Mc100yearsCain has some guts to call Obama. Let’s just say he is confused.
I will not even go through the reasons why McCain cannot be trusted either.
He wants to run on his “national security experience”. Gen wesley Clark has explained this very clearly, if you have been listening.
This talk of labelling Obama as a “radical tax and spend liberal” just don’t fly. How come the press never talk about McCain’s rich elitist background? I guess this only applies to Edwards.
Posted by: Buddy | June 29, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
I would rather trust Obama then McCain with my future.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 29, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Badger – “Mr. Arrogance”? I thought we were talking about Obama and McCain, not Bush? As for why Obama won’t debate McCain – why should he give that sad old man free advertising?
Posted by: betty | June 29, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
If Obama is such a uniter, why haven’t I seen major bills named things like Obama-Hagel, or Obama-Frist? Yet we have major legislation with McCain’s authorship all the time, often coauthored by democratic leaders, and usually on critical issues like campaign finance reform or immigration.
Support a real leader – McCain walks the walk.
Posted by: Skeptic | June 29, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Ray Jay,
What exactly is that experience? 2 years in the Senate and….hmmm….where has he actually done what he purports to do as President? Who has he brought together? What has he actually done as a Senator? I guess that impressive work as a Chicago community organizer is all we need. Oh…I get it…the political climate is going to change just becuase King Barrack is now President. Yeah right.
McCain 08
Posted by: Jim | June 29, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Obama reaches across the aisle? He still has a lot of Hillary supporters who hate him.
Posted by: Pepsiholic | June 29, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
This is all about wordsmithing … accuse the other guy of what you’re doing so he can’t bring it up.
Republicans are great at defining the box democrats have to fight in. That’s why democrats often lose.
I think Obama has shown he’s not going to let McCain get away with defining how this fight is going to be waged
Posted by: beaupritchard | June 29, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Temagami – nice try, but you clearly have no understanding of the government’s relationship to the marketplace. Without good government to ensure a fair and free marketplace, there would be no business, only lawlessness and mafia-style business. Government guarantees the freedom of the markets and safeguards the fair creation of wealth. You have a very immature and simplistic worldview. I doubt you actually know anything about business at all.
Posted by: dannyc | June 29, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
anita rao
you can be very sarcastic I see. Well, I voted for Hillary, and now support McCain. Obama is way too dangerous a candidate!
Posted by: Marty | June 29, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Why should we trust McCain. He’s flip-flopped on EVERY major issue. Immigration, Economic, Iraq, Drilling, Roe vs. Wade, Supreme Court Justices…
He wonders why Republicans won’t vote for him and several flocking to the Obama camp… this is the reason ^^^
He’s unstable.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 29, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Susie – yes, Obama taught Constitutional Law. Also, he has just as much experience as Lincoln did when he was elected. Sometimes we need a change.
Posted by: betty | June 29, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Marty – I seriously doubt that. 99% of people on these boards who claim to have voted fo Hillary and to be switching to McCain are liars and dyed-in-the-wool Republicans trying to bamboozle the rest of us with their BS. I suspect you are one of them. No true Democrat would sell out everything they believed in by voting for McCain. Give it up. Nobody believes you.
Posted by: anita rao | June 29, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
After seeing Sen Hillary Clinton stand and speak along side Sen. Barack Obama at the rally in Unity, N.H. the other day, I became convinced that he would never choose her to be his running mate. NOT because she is not capable of being a great President, but simply because next to her, Barack realized how incredibly weak he looked. And is.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 29, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
PhillyPaul – lol, kinda like mccain. he’s sold out everything he believed in and flip-flopped to pander to the GOP money men. screw them both and vote for Ron Paul!
Posted by: david beal | June 29, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
In June 1988 Michael Dukakis was leading George Bush by 15-18 points in all polls. Once people started looking at the candidates in the fall..well, we all know how that ended. The same case can be made for 4-5 different elections over the past 40 years. Summer polls mean nothing.
McCain will destroy Obama in November becuase America is filled with honest clear thinking citizens who know a fake when they see one.
Posted by: Jim | June 29, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
betty – obama has proven time and again that without the security blanket of a teleprompter he will stick his foot in his mouth. This guy doesnt even know the difference between Vet.day, and Mem Day. Wants to be the president of 57 states, thought that Canada had a President, and not a Prime Minister. Talk about a complete ignoramus.
Posted by: Badger | June 29, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
McCain can be trusted to change his opinion to suit his audience.
Posted by: JR | June 29, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Hey Anita, so you buy into the fakeness that is going on right now? A month ago this man was calling reporters sweetie and lacked experience. People who believed Hillary’s message rather than today’s unity spin know this man’s lack of qualification. Hillary was right on before the arm-twisting and legacy preservation began.
Posted by: Go4It | June 29, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
I can tell who watches Fox and who doesn’t just by reading these post, McCain/Fox, the mis-information/lies byways and hiways. I have better things to do with my time, like donate even bigger to Obama and try to evolve to a higher understanding of the human race and wonder when we will stop the hate and get rid of our egos. That is one thing Obama requires when hiring someone, no drama, no ego’s that is why you do not hear all the screaming and name calling coming frpm his camp like McCains, Obama sticks to issues and only defends himself.
Posted by: Jules | June 29, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
david beal:
Actually, a vote for Bob Barr or Ralph Nader would be a good choice as well!
Posted by: Timmy | June 29, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
PS Anita I early voted in the North Carolina primary for Hillary at Bur-Mil park, 4 days before the NC primary. How convenient for you to assume that anyone who disagrees with you is a liar. Hillary is experienced, tough, savvy, and does what she thinks is right. Based on his record, McCain shares some of these characteristics and is the next best candidate.
Posted by: Go4It | June 29, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Termagami – because even the oil companies aren’t all that interested in drilling in ANWAR. The returns on the investment are too small to interest them and it’s a band aid on a sucking chest wound anyway. You Republicans call yourselves conservatives, but you’re willing to throw everything away whenever there’s a crisis. Read Naomi Klein’s “Crisis Capitalism” and you’ll understand why we are no longer going to let you cons scare us into giving up our rights and the things we hold dear.
Posted by: betty | June 29, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
In June 1988 Michael Dukakis was leading George Bush by 15-18 points in all polls. Once people started looking at the candidates in the fall..well, we all know how that ended. The same case can be made for 4-5 different elections over the past 40 years. Summer polls mean nothing.
McCain will destroy Obama in November becuase America is filled with honest clear thinking citizens who know a fake when they see one.
Posted by: Jim | Jun 29, 2008 11:59:49 AM
44444444444444444444444444444
A few things you left out of the equation. The country wasn’t in this bad of shape then and the public didn’t hate republicans like they do now. Oh and Dukakis was not nearly as good a candidate as Barack Obama with as much money and strategic reach. But keep right on dreaming or is Obama causing you night terrors?
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Go4It – So you would sell out everything Hillary beleives in by voting for McCain? Sorry, I don’t buy it. You’re a Republican liar.
Posted by: anita rao | June 29, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
I’d vote for Bob Barr before i vote for McCain. I least i know Barr has been consistent on the issues especially, the war. The republican has not platform, the party is too intrusive and too far to the right. McCain used to be in the center now he’s positioning himself to the far ‘loony’ right.
Posted by: NotMyParty | June 29, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Marine, i donated $350 to the Obama campaign last week. The hate fill rants by these racist conservatives posing as Hillary supporters only makes me more enthusiastic about the democrats regaining control of congress and the oval office.
Posted by: Sarah | June 29, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Badger I really enjoy this lively debate. Truly. Emotions aside, most candidates who are behind wants more debates or “town halls”. Instead of focusing on pre-general rhetoric, focus on your candidate’s inability to inspire his base.
Posted by: SQR | June 29, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
This tactic is going to backfire on McCain bigtime – he’s not very trustworthy himself. In recent months he’s reversed every single independent position he once held in order to pander to the GOP big money donors. He will be owned by the same people who own Bush – he will be more of the same. No thank you.
Posted by: amy in amityville | June 29, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Around this time in 2004 Bush was leading Kerry.
The polls are more advance now then 40 years ago.
A poll four years ago from today stated Bush leading by 1 percentage point. Bush won the election by 2.4
Kerry never lead in Ohio, Missouri, Nevada, Virginia, Colorado, Hawaii, and Indiana equaling to 73 electoral votes
Kerry lost by 35.
These are states Obama will win. Also N.C., Iowa, and New Mexico.
I truly believe Obama will win in a landslide.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 29, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
It is surprising that the worst flip flopper in the U.S. senate accusing obama as a lier. He needs to retire.
Posted by: Independent Josh | June 29, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Sarah and Marnie: I agree with you! This election is about the issues, not the smear. Hillary’s views and policies are very closely parallel to Obama’s. John McCain is opposite to practically everything Hillary supported.
I voted for Hillary in the primary, and I was disappointed she didn’t win. That said, I’m not going to slap her in the face by voting against her ideals!
I’m supporting Obama not because of the man, but because his ideals are more in line with Hillary’s and mine.
I too am donating to Obama since he won the primary. Not so much at a time, but a little every paycheck.
Posted by: Heather | June 29, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
the republicans are corrupt, disgraced, and devoted only to the further enrichment of themselves and the corporate masters they serve
you can vote for them or you can vote for policies and people that will do something to help the middle class
if you want to give more of your money to rich white people, by all means vote for mccain
Posted by: water | June 29, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Independent Josh,
Retire indeed. The man is old, and does not know what he is saying, nor does he know where he stands anymore.
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
I can’t believe that MccAin has the audacity to make that claim. He has flipped on much larger more significant issues. He flipped on tac cuts. He was vehemently opposed but not says he is in favor. He flipped on immigation. He was the freaken sponsor of a bill granting so called amnesity but to get the nomination he said that he would vote against his own bill! He said he was againt torture and yet he voted against a bill that would ban torture. MccAin stands for nothing except pandering. And he had the gaul to say the same about Obama when all he flipped on was to now say he will pay for his own campaign ads? It is not even close! The media is kissing MccAin’s rear. Just watch Bob Scheifer on Face the Nation; he did not even attempt to be fair.
Posted by: kevin | June 29, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Meri, because it’s more profitable to drill where there are large oil deposits.
Posted by: Pepsiholic | June 29, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
RMC – who said Obama was perfect? We just prefer him to the other guy. Is that alright with you?
Posted by: marnie | June 29, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Politicians, as ordinary people, have the right to change their mind and fine tune their strategies as time goes on. It’s up to us the voters to figure out which changes are sincere, and which pandering for votes. I believe McCain is not the honest one. Compare McCain flip flops on major issues of taxes, illegal aliens, energy policies,religious right,and torture. He doesn’t really have much to say about Trust & honesty.
Posted by: Americana2008 | June 29, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
What is McCain talking about.He does well at town hall meetings and he expects Obama to give him the advantage.If he really expects Obama to be Jesus like to show the other cheek that is a pity!Obama will be ready for the town hall meetings,public financing if McCain is willing to shut his surrogates up and the NRA which has vowed to spend 40 million in the campaign against Obama.McCain claimed credit for the veterans benefit bill which he opposed!He lacked total grace when he commented on Obama’s nomination implying it was not legitimate.He was silent spectator when so many lives were being lost in the war as long as the public opinion was in favor of the war.He started criticizing the conduct of war only when the public opinion overwhelmingly changed!He is still for the torture and how picipled does that make him?He knows that no one would risk questioning his war hero status.Can anybody substantiate how is an exceptional hero when there are so many who have lost their lives and been held prisoners?Look at the young kids who have been totally maimed with no proper medical care and ofuture and how is John Mcain who has all his body functions well preserved and has beome a millionaire a war hero.These kids he sent to the war have no future with no rehabilitative potential and the sad thing is he has not learnt from a wasted war and he is talikng about more war.In a civilized society there is no place for war.The barbarians fought wars.Should we be different as we evolve.May be McCain does not believe in evolution!
Posted by: Vish | June 29, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Temagami – nice try, but McCain’s handpicked audiences aren’t a free and open forum – it’s an ambush and a publicity stunt. We already know that Repbulicans do not act in good faith and cannot be trusted. Why should Obama give the lame old man free publicity.
Posted by: Karl Hungus | June 29, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
bb – so you would sell out everything hillary believes in out of spite? i seriously doubt you’re a democrat.
Posted by: marnie | June 29, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Those of you in love with the perfect Obama need to read the Boston Globe article about the terrible public housing in Chicago which was published on June 27th. Read up on that “change.”
Posted by: RMC | Jun 29, 2008 12:41:41 PM
4444444444444444444444444
There is nothing you can throw up against Obama that will equal what republicans have done over just these past 8 years and get people to vote against Obama. Nothing, the republicans have bankrupt our treasury, trampled over our rights while subverting the constitution. That’s a pretty high bar and bridge too far to get people to reward that behavior with their votes. No Thanks!
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Yes and I guess Obama is too blame for media bias
It’s a known fact Obama owns all the major networks and he’s responsible for the bias coverage (sarcasm)
Posted by: Vanessa | June 29, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Pepsiholic – our right to a writ of habeus corpus has been greatly diminished under the Bush administration. Where have you been? So much for you winning on “facts”! lol
Posted by: Karl Hungus | June 29, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I have to agree with Mr. McCain. Obama, the “golden boy” of the mainstream media and political analyst has “flip-flopped” over and over again to the point of outright lying. Obama can’t be trusted…..look at him, look at his associations, look at his pretense of having a stance on NAFTA, the GE, Immigration and the list goes on and on. Obama feels he can change the rules now, that he is above reproach. What amazes me is that Obama is outspending McCain 6 to 1, but yet according to Gallup, they are both tied at 44%. If Obama is all the great, he would be blowing McCain away. America is waking up and will not elect him in November. McCain 08 !
Posted by: david from texas | June 29, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I’m getting a chuckle at all these “we don’t know Obama” posts. If you don’t know anything about him, FIND OUT! There are plenty of places for you to find what you need to make an informed decision. But don’t sit here and tell us that there’s a lack of information. You just haven’t bothered to look at it.
Posted by: Kyuzo | June 29, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
McBush is getting desperate. He is so far behind in projected electoral votes. You guys can talk back and forth all you want, but this is already over.
Posted by: JaredJ | June 29, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Marnie, Wow! You take everything personally? I do not believe you, as an Obama supporter..not an individual, can sit there and dish out the hatred you have for republicans and not expect to have someone question your sanity for expecting democrats to deliver you from some false claim that Bush’s tax breaks did not benefit the middle class. I AM middle class and I DID get tax relief! I do NOT subscribe to some insane notion that because others are more wealthy than me, that I can expect to raid their bank accounts and not expect to see them to pass that pain on to consumers. Like it or not, business owners have a responsibility to their investors to earn a return on their investments. They pass along all tax infringements to you and me. THAT is what Obama wants for us and NO WAY am I going to vote for that!
Posted by: clarkohrepub | June 29, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
I wouldn’t hold Obama responsible for the media bias, but many in the media happen to be in the demographic that is highly supportive of him. We live in a strange time when a shock jock like Imus is held more responsible for a bigoted statement than is a presidential candidate like Obama.
Posted by: bb | June 29, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
What Hillary says now won’t change anyones mind about voting for John McCain. Too little too late. This election has turned into a complete joke. Obama can not make a decision by himself. Hillary is just trying to get her debt paid off. One using the other. It’s all a money thing now and popularity contest. We are in for a rude awakening if Obama is elected. Be careful, very careful who you vote for this November.
Posted by: C Good | June 29, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
And we can trust flip-flop McCain? Why doesn’t he explain to his supporters that he doubled down on public financing for the primary.
Posted by: sherbug | June 29, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
I would trust Obama over tax evading, cheating, double talking, flip flopping, wife dumping McBush on any issue.
Posted by: tom | June 29, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Karl, I asked Merri how HER rights were affected. And did we give German POW’s the right of habeus corpus? And I’m assuming that you are a US citizen so no, your right has not been diminished. I thought you said you use facts? Wrong as usual.
Posted by: Pepsiholic | June 29, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Rumor has it that Barack uses a teleprompter at family gatherings for fear of insulting relatives.
Posted by: Badger | June 29, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
What is interesting in all of this is that we have all been duped into thinking that the next President can change anything.
Obama’s whole campaign is on change. He can’t change anything.
No politician has ever brought about any lasting change. For Obama to say that he can do it is ludicrous.
Clinton even with his popularity couldn’t do it.
Bush with a majority in both houses couldn’t do it, and neither will Obama who, even if he does win, has a majority in congress and the Senate too
will either.
The reason is that it is all about money. Special interest runs the government, not the people. The politicians promise the moon and the stars but deliver precious little.
Whoever wins the election and becomes President of this country will be one third of the equation. 1/3 power is the Presidents, 1/3 power is the Congress and Senates, and 1/3 is the supreme Court.
Obama or McCain saying they can bring about change is not true. The only person that can bring about change is a person that can unite all three branches of government. That will require a person of outstanding integrity, of outstanding vision, and outstanding recognition. None of the candidates has what is needed.
The american people need to make a stand and stop being led around by a rope in the brass ring of politics in their nose.
Posted by: Mike | June 29, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Merri, still waiting on your reply on how YOU have had your right taken away. Care to elaborate? Why are you so quiet?
Posted by: Pepsiholic | June 29, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
So we’re supposed to trust the guy that reversed all of his important positions this year to pander to his base? The McCain of 2008 is not the McCain I knew and liked.
Both McCain are politicians and are running for president so I’m wise enough to know not to take what either says at face value.
Give me a break old man.
Posted by: John | June 29, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
You Americans were stupid enough to vote Bush in twice and will probably be stupid enough to vote McCain in.
don’t you know your empire is falling? In the entire history of the world, no empire has been able to sustain itself when it spreads itself too thin militarily and monetarily. You guys are letting Republicans break your economy…problem is, Canada is going down with you because our economies are so closely tied. For your sake, and the rest of the world, I pray you are smart enough to vote the Republicans OUT!
Posted by: JP in Canada | June 29, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Mike – So by your reasoning (no President can change anything), there isn’t any reason to have a President at all, is there?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
McCain saying someone else’s word can not be trusted? This from the master of flip ‘n flop himself. Ya gotta love these Republicans. The voters don’t like their policies nor how they have run the country so McCain has turned to the Reeps favorite bag of tricks. Number one is to accuse their opponent of their own worst characteristics. Two, to lie about everything all the time. And three, to call names. That is all they have got. But, is it enough to win this election?
Posted by: afgail | June 29, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Mr. Coffee – I’m sure all candidates are evaluated to some degree.
And I don’t particularly like character assassination against McCain any more than against Obama or Clinton.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Merri: “It won’t matter, Barack Obama is gaining as many disaffected republicans as democrats he’s likely to lose. Barack Obama POTUS has a nice ring to it.”
You sound like overconfident democrats did in 2004. No way Bush would win!!!
Posted by: Pepsiholic | June 29, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Go4it- FYI I was a Democrat long before Obama came on the scene, so just because I decided not to become a turncoat only makes me a true Democrat. You being so offended by my Rush Limbaugh comment shows that you were never a Democrat to begin with. Secondly all this injustice you claim was done to fellow democrat should make the person it may have been personally done to – “Hillary” offended enough to run to another party and she hasn’t.
Posted by: vote4peace | June 29, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Virginia:
“He claims the War on Terror is a mistake so he basically supports the complete failure to defend our nation.”
LIE
“He says the planet is in peril and claims to be able to control the weather.”
LIE
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Neither Obama nor McCain should be trusted with regard to their campaign positions. This is elementary in American Politics. Nothing a candidate says during his campaign means squat.
Posted by: argoblaster47 | June 29, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Ask the San Diego Property Tax Collector if John McCain can be trusted.
Posted by: Stacy Chadwick | June 29, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
jock – good point – i forgot that the supreme court recently gave bush a smackdown on this one.
Posted by: Karl Hungus | June 29, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
To GO4IT it would seem to me that there is quite a bit of contradiction post. You seem to be saying that your vote is determined by the issues and principle. So in the democratic primary that would mean that you took a careful look at the issues and determined that you agreed with the positions of Hillary Clinton. In the matter of principle you determined that her principles were the best, or for that matter using principle you decided to register as a Democrat.
I absolutely cannot understand how anyone who supported Hillary Clinton’s position on the issues can now be supporting John McCain. These two positions are miles apart. On taxes the are completely opposed to each other, on Iraq, they are completely opposed to each other, on the matter of supreme court judges they are miles, and miles, and miles apart. It now turns out that in the one area they might have been together, immigration, they are also far apart. Now in that matter of the right of women to choose McCain and Clinton are not even on the same planet.
I really am confused by this position of so many former Clinton that I wish someone can explain it to me.
I honestly am tempted to believe that there is some reason for this position that is not being mentioned, for the explanation of GO4IT just does not pass the smell test.
Posted by: Confused | June 29, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Virginia,
I have read Obama’s “Blueprint for Change,” and he does not say many of those things. Care to provide your evidence?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Kari,
You are right I am sorry. I retract the false statement about Obama controling the weather. Now that I think about this he does support the Green Revolution of reducing our dependence on foreign oil and cleaner environment. We do have one thing in common. Again I apologize.
Posted by: Virginia | June 29, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
“You know, this election is about trust, and trusting people’s word” McCain told a crowd of donors to his campaign.
And here, I was hoping this election would be about the ECONOMY!
Posted by: belle | June 29, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Merri: “It won’t matter, Barack Obama is gaining as many disaffected republicans as democrats he’s likely to lose. Barack Obama POTUS has a nice ring to it.”
You sound like overconfident democrats did in 2004. No way Bush would win!!!
Posted by: Pepsiholic | Jun 29, 2008 1:42:02 PM
44444444444444444
The country wasn’t in this bad of shape then and the public didn’t hate republicans like they do now. Oh and Kerry was not nearly as good a candidate as Barack Obama with as much money and strategic reach. But keep right on dreaming or is Obama causing you night terrors? In other worlds there is nothing you can throw up against Obama that will equal what republicans have done over just these past 8 years and get people to vote against Obama. Nothing, the republicans have bankrupt our treasury, trampled over our rights while subverting the constitution. That’s a pretty high bar and bridge too far to get people to reward that behavior with their votes. No Thanks, offer declined!
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Obama said he would restrict his campaign spending to the public financing limitation if McCain would agree to do the same. But, Mc Cain announced he would not accept public financing and its spending limits two to three weeks before Obama did. So where is the flip flop? Is the MSM ignorant? Bias? Or just feeding a baseless controversy so they can have something to talk about? How can you trust a guy who claims to be a super citizen but fails to pay property taxes for five year? If he can’t manage his own finances, how can he be trusted to be a good manager of the country?
Posted by: seadaddy | June 29, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
belle -
Unfortunately, I think most elections are about how much you can get people to distrust your opponent by smearing him. That seems to be what America is all about these days.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
maybe Obama is afraid to debate a “crdible” canidate.
Posted by: Kim | Jun 28, 2008 11:38:48 PM
If McCain wants his face on TV and in the newspapers before September, he can pay for it or make controversal statements to get it. Obama would be a fool to GIVE McCain free publicity. Obama isn’t a fool and your whining isn’t going to make him go against a great strategy.
Posted by: Nema | June 29, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Badger,
The only thing race about Obama is that he is biracial, and his ancestry is all over the place, and he would not give Nadar, the Republican benafactor, the satisfaction of “talking black”
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Just asking – Kudos to you!!
Posted by: vote4peace | June 29, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Mr. Coffee – Let’s not talk about Wright. He’s not running for president.
Posted by: Ryan | June 29, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Obama accepted townhall meetings. Two. McCain refused to compromise.
Why do people keep pretending that Obama offered ONE townhall or NO townhalls. Do reporters reflexively and uncritically approve everything John McCain says? Is this why he gets away with so much BS?
Posted by: Ed | June 29, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
The height of hypocricy – Obamites who blindly follow an empty suit stained with racism, have the audacity to call someone a racist who confronts them on it. Almost laughable, but too disgusting.
Posted by: Badger | Jun 29, 2008 2:08:30 PM
444444444444444444444444
Badger clearly you’ve stained yourself with racism. So should we ignore you? In any case, no matter how much you label Obama a racist it won’t work. Because he has exibited nothing but congenial, inclusive, respectful, behavior toward everyone even when they didn’t deserve it. That what I call a respectful person and true gentleman.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Ed,
The reason Obama would not accept the McCain proposal of all ten town-hall meetings is simply that, in his wisdom, he smells a diversionary ploy, and would rather authentically stick to his own plans. In similar instance, to keep the US diverted from Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda puts out a call to toughen its fight with the US in Iraq. Now, unlike McCain who thinks his adversary’s intentions are gospel and is singing wildly in agreement, Obama correctly smells the ploy, and declines to continue to be diverted away from the real tangible front in the war on terror. Obama may be young biologically, but he is hardly what you call a novice intellectually. You never let the opponent pick the place and time for battle, especially, when it is to the detriment of your own calculated, well-thought-out plan of engagement.
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
I would wait on the townhall meetings until I had the nomination officially.
John likes those because he won’t have tough questions.
Finally, McCain wants cheap coverage.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | June 29, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Badger – We were not calling you a racist because of your opposition to Obama; only because of something you said. If you acknowledge it was a poor choice of words, we would probably drop it.
And I am not “blindly following” Obama. My eyes are wide open, thank you very much. (He wasn’t even my first choice for President.)
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
This reference by Badger and others to the reverend Wright matter is important. I agree that the excerpts we have heard are troubling. I do not think that it is a matter of racism, and Badger you sum it up correctly when you spoke about how fraudulent the whole matter of religion is. What is really sad is the fact that John McCain and his political party of right wing religious nuts have forced anyone running for the presidency to profess religion.
The John McCain who ran against George Bush had it right when he castigated Falwell and the others, but the McCain of today drank the Koolaid and is just as ban as all the rest.
My question to Badger therefore, is, How is Obama’s pastor Wright problem any different from the John McCain problem of kissing the Falwell ring(I could say posterior), and his complete kissing up to all of the religious nuts many of whom are as racist as you say Wright is?
Posted by: Oh what a tangled web | June 29, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Fox News just did an article stating that the offensive posts to blogs like this one are being turned over to the FBI. It was claimed that they can trace the originator through their IP address.
Posts oriented toward racism or defamation were specifically mentioned.
Of course, that means you’d have to believe Fox News.
Posted by: Brian | June 29, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
McCain is desperate to get into the “townhall meeting” format because it is the only format he does well in. He probably proposed TEN of them because that would be fine with him, and if Obama suggested fewer he could accuse Obama of being “afraid.” McCain had better be careful here, because Obama does quite well in the townhall format. He doesn’t have much extra motivation to go there because his rallies are so effective, but I’m sure he will do at least one or two.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
HuffPost’s dollar2donut:
“his wife fights five years to get him out of that hell-hole in Vietnam. She gets in a car accident and is disabled…he returns, cheats on her with Cindy, then leaves his wife and marries Cindy one month later so she can finance his poiltical career. Yeah, that’s the kind of man you can trust all right!”
A man who leaves his wife for another woman in time of adversity has no backbone as a man, not to talk of shame and integrity.
This is your straight talk express?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Here we Go!
In describing the reasons he believes the Republicans’ presumptive nominee for president would be better prepared than the Democrats’ to lead the nation next January, Sen. Joe Lieberman said that history shows the United States would likely face a terrorist attack in 2009.
“Our enemies will test the new president early,”
God we have to get these people out of office.
Posted by: Thinking | June 29, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
John McCain’s claim to accepting public finance is going to be a bit of a dilemma for him. According to the rules, John McCain can only spend $56 million before the Republican convention in September. He can then spend $84 million after the convention. However, as of February 24, 2008, he had already spent $49 million.
This prompted a suit filed with the FEC over McCain’s finances. Since the FEC doesn’t have a quorum, they will not be able to rule on the suit. However, when they do rule, a fine of up to $25,000 and/or up to 5 years in prison can be levied.
On campaign finances, John McCain has flip-flopped several times. First, he opted out. Then, when he was nearly broke, he used his public financing as collateral for a loan, opting back in. After the loan, he opted out again, because of the suit. Now that Obama has opted out, McCain has opted back in.
Unfortunately, if McCain stays in public finance, the lawsuit with the FEC remains viable. Depending on when this gets ruled on, it could create a problem.
Posted by: Larry2 | June 29, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Unfortunately, John McCain has proven himself to either be experiencing horrific periods of memory loss over and over and over again, or he is just a pathological liar, or perhaps both. I would like to share with the world a video compilation of John McCain’s blatant lies or unfortunate recurring memory loss:
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/325.html
Also, remember and research THE KEATING FIVE!
Posted by: Janice G Washington | June 29, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
So now Obama is a racist. This is to say the lease interesting. Obama is the product os a white woman and a black man. His father(the black man for those who are slow) left when he was two years of age. He was then raised by his WHITE mother and WHITE grandmother.
Now if the forgoing is true why is Obama always referred to as being black. He is as white as he is black. In fact he is more white than he is black, that by virtue of the fact that he was raised by two white women.
In my very humble opinion, this Obam candidacy is what is great about these United States of America. This what we can stick in the eye of all those in other countries which accuse us of being racist and oppressive and arrogant. That because no other Western democracy is even close to having a person like Obama contesting its post powerful political position, not France, not Britain, not Germany, not Australia and those countries in the ease also will have to give us our props for there is no way anyone but a Chinese person can be premier of China.
No none of this is to say that Obama must get a free pass, but it is to say that all this racist stuff should stop.
Posted by: Just asking | June 29, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
The world’s going to end in 2012 anyways, screw politics!
Posted by: SCREWPOLITICS | June 29, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
The dangerously temperamental and out-of-control McCain is throwing rocks in his glass house. Obama is a principled man who has changed his mind openly about some issues in his life, as anyone does.
McCain is flip-flopping and pandering all over the place on so many issues, including campaign finance reform.
The pro-war corporate media will continue to spin for McCain I’m sure.
Posted by: tomsoppe | June 29, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
The lobbying firm of McCain campaign manager Rick Davis has been accused of acting in direct opposition to America’s foreign interests, according to the New York Times.
According to the article, Rick Davis’ company, Davis Manafort was working with pro-Russian interests in the Ukraine who have business ties to Iran.
Posted by: Mickey | June 29, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
It’s not just Obama whose words can;t be trusted. Read this quick! ABC News will detete it soon.
My niece, Katelyn, stationed at Baluud , Iraq was assigned, with others of her detachment, to be escort/guard/ watcher for Martha Raddatz of ABC News
as she covered John McCain’s recent trip to Iraq . Katelyn and her Captain
stood directly behind Raddatz as she queried GI’s walking past. They kept
count of the GI’s and you should remember these numbers. She asked 60 GI’s who they planned to vote for in November. 54 said John McCain, 4 for Obama and 2 for Hillary. Katelyn called home and told her Mom and Dad to watch ABC news the next night because she was standing directly behind Raddatz and maybe they’d see her on TV. Mom and Dad of course, called and emailed all the kinfolk to watch the newscast and maybe see Katelyn. Well, of course, we all watched and what we saw wasn’t a glimpse of Katelyn, but got a hell’uva view of skewed news. After a dissertation on McCain’s trip and speech, ABC showed 5 GI’s being asked by Raddatz how they were going to vote in November 3 for Obama and 2 for Clinton . No mention of the 54 for McCain.
Posted by: Thomas A. Beebe | June 29, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Obama is so sleek with all of his words and deceptive in telling what is still to be known as truth. I understand why the public has ignored the lies of this so called liar and very untrue person called Obama! I cannot even begin to think of voting someone so deceiving as he ,for I want my son to see what this individual stands for and where we would end up with his misconceiving tactics and what is right and what is wrong!!!
Posted by: trac | June 29, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
I agree with TJ.
My problem is I am not sure whether Obama is Black either. I have not heard him taking about African Americans in U.S. Have you? Correct me if I am wrong.
Posted by: Susie | June 29, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Bill Good job parroting the RNC talking points.
Posted by: bushrots | June 29, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Trac,
Yes I could not agree with you more. What we need is more honesty that is the hallmark of the current administration. I cant think of one time when this Republican administration has lied to the American people.
Posted by: Bon Vivant | June 29, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Amen Sen. MCcain!!!
Posted by: tom | June 29, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Whatever you say James but I myself could never vote for a man that sold out his country and his brothers in arms safety to get better treatment from the enemy as a POW. Could never EVER vote for a man that left his wife when she was crippled in a car accident and needed him the most. If he gets elected and swares on a bible to defend the US what hollow words they would be. He already broke his promice when he raise his hand and swore to defend the country as a soldier broke his promice to God to love honer and cherish in sickness and health and im sure he would break his promice to the american people to diligently execute the office of the president of the united states as well.
Posted by: Mike Jenkins | June 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Annoy the media. Vote Obama, not the guy who supports 90+% of the Bush agenda.
Posted by: tomsoppe | June 29, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
TRUST?!?!?!
KEEPING YOUR WORD?!?!?!
I guess McCanes first wife should have been able to TRUST HIM not to SCREW AROUND on her when he returned from the military, then KEEP HIS WORD and not dump her AND their children to marry a hot-looking (at that time) younger blonde with a fortune of money in the bank.
I guess McCane should have KEPT HIS WORD to his first wife and not run out on her life after she was in a horriffic accident.
McInsane… do you REALLY want to talk about TRUST and KEEPING YOUR WORD?????
Posted by: Don | June 29, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
If the diebold machines count all write in votes for Hillary as a vote for Obama..It’s a one line code and you’ll be sorry.
It’s important to cast a protest vote..we’ll have to live with it for 4 years..Obama wouldn’t be better than jmac anyway.
Posted by: calli | June 29, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Careful what you post; three times tody I’ve posted a report onthe total dishonesty of an ABC correspondent reporting on the GI’s choice for President. Three times it disappeared from the blog in less that two minutes.
Posted by: Beebe Again | June 29, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
James – who cares about flag pins? Who would base their vote on something so trivial and silly? Get a life.
Posted by: Lloyd Nakatani | June 29, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Careful what you post; three times tody I’ve posted a report onthe total dishonesty of an ABC correspondent reporting on the GI’s choice for President. Three times it disappeared from the blog in less that two minutes.
Posted by: Beebe Again | June 29, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
to James is sick: I couldn’t make this stuff up if I tried. Your retort indicates that you don’t know who you are supporting, and prefer not to know your candidate. Here’s a link to another article with the story — With some luck, Hanuman-ji to adorn Oval Office. http://www.hindustantimes.com/ By the way, the Democrats Abroad will send 22 delegates to the DNC convention with 11 votes. The majority of Democrats Abroad plan to vote for Obama including the person who will bring the gold-plated idol to match the one that Obama carries as a good luck charm.
Posted by: James | June 29, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Badger keeps posting about that church, but people seem to be taking care of the “Hussein” thing themselves. This is hilarious!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29hussein.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1214768826-QsvP7bUfu/h7GOuNsWWQBg
Posted by: Nema | June 29, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Badger keeps posting about that church, but people seem to be taking care of the “Hussein” thing themselves. This is hilarious!
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29hussein.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1214768826-QsvP7bUfu/h7GOuNsWWQBg
Posted by: Nema | June 29, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Lloyd:…who cares about flag pins? Who would base their vote on something so trivial and silly” My vote will not be determined by a flag pin, but by what the candidate stands for and their honesty and trustworthiness. Obama can’t decide about a flag pin and disses it, which is similar to his MO and changing his mind about other things. For example, Obama supported NAFTA in 2007 – and now to gain votes, he says he is against NAFTA. McCain stands heads and shoulders above his DNC opponent by this measure of earning public trust.
Posted by: James | June 29, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Let’s dial back the hyperbole for just a second. McCain has flip-flopped on scores of issues since the primaries began and he’s reversing himself on a weekly basis now. Changing your position on an issue is NOT lying. Changing your mind is NOT lying. Hillary Clinton is the only contender caught actually LYING about established facts and she was caught more than once. Obama’s position changes are not only exceedingly rare compared with McCain’s constant spinning, but they are not lies. Is it a lie for McCain to characterize them as such?
fp
Posted by: fdp3 | June 29, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Sorry James. Add one more Dem vote to McCain
Posted by: Laurie | June 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
James: “McCain stands heads and shoulders above his DNC opponent by this measure of earning public trust.”
You’re kidding right?
McCain is now for the Bush tax cuts even though he said at the time that he “could not in good conscience” vote for them. What do you think happened to his good conscience?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Beebe Again – Yes, people tend to get offended when you call them liars. Go figure.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Black democrats need to read why Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.DYK-Why+MLK+was+a+Republican&tp_preview=true
Posted by: Sally | June 29, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
I’m amazed at those who think McCain isn’t the pot calling the kettle black here. If he was saying today what he said in 2000, I’d probably vote for him. But he’s sold himself to the ultra-right wing.
Posted by: Mickey Cashen | June 29, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Let’s stay in Iraq for a hundred years. Wait I didn’t really mean a hundred years. Wait I did but I meant it differently than what I said. And no lobbyists in our campaigns. Yes there’s lobbyists in my campaign. Flippity floppity McCain trying to be ironic again.
Posted by: Scotti | June 29, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Sally,
That would be easier to swallow had McCain not voted agaisnt the MLK Holiday 4 times before he voted for it.
Posted by: jmc663 | June 29, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
At first, I thought I could see good things in Obama. I was wrong. Obama can not stand on any issues (War,NAFTA,Immigration etc…). He is the worst crooked politician, I have seen in American history. The man just talks. He is just a good talker. McCain is a crook too, but he still has some human dignity. Amazing, every 4 years American people send a crook to the White house and they call him Mr. President!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: crookedpolitician | June 29, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Jmc663; At least he voted for it.
Posted by: Sally | June 29, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon‘s 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation‘s first goals and timetables
Posted by: Sally | June 29, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
I think Obama is being pretty smart in doing all his ‘spring cleaning’ now so that he can move from now and make the case against McCain and for his vision of change, In the end are any of Obama’s ‘flip flops’ gonna count for much? Do voters really care about how a campaign is financed? He hasn’t flipped on taxes, as McCain has, hasn’t flipped on immigration or the war.
I am actually beginning to think that after the Conventions, when Obama will put out a clear vision in great oratory and McCain will be forced to stand next to real Republicans and won’t be able to run away from his party, we will begin to see a more and more convincing victory build up for Obama. And Obama is clearing the ground now by getting rid of a few positions he wants to deemphasise. Obama is the best Democratic candidate for President in many years. GOPers should underestimate him at there peril.
Posted by: markymark | June 29, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965.
Posted by: Sally | June 29, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
During the civil rights era of the 1960′s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools.
Posted by: Sally | June 29, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Anderson Cooper said last night about Obama: “Obumer”
Posted by: plainsm | June 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
The simple fact is McCain is just saying what a whole bunch of people are saying, which is a feeling of distrust for Obama. What’s that Obama and his supporters keep saying, Oh yeah, that’s it – JUST GET OVER IT.
Posted by: Laurie | June 29, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Obama cannot be trusted. It’s fishy how this junior senator shot to political stardom. He’s a stooge of corporate interests and the DNC leadership.
McCain is a war hero with decades of experience and vetted. Easy choice this November.
McCain 08
Posted by: Juju | June 29, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Don’t vote for McCain! He likes to put babies on spikes and walk around villages waving them in in the air. Sometimes he has 5 or 6 babies on each spike! Also, he is dyslexic, has vertigo and gum disease! In Arizona he voted once to cancel Memorial Day and call it McCain Day. Don’t vote for McCain!!!
Posted by: Jit | June 29, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
The McCains have an adopted black daughter. Bridget McCain was a seriously ill baby in Mother Teresa’s orphanage when Cindy McCain visited and decided to bring her back to the United States for medical treatment in 1991. John and Cindy adopted her not long after. John McCain and his family will be good for the White House.
Posted by: Sally | June 29, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
dont trust the words of little bush mccain or hillary boy little obama clinton i would not trust them to go out side
Posted by: BEE MAN444 | June 29, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
McCain is a double talking old man who thinks America should carry him all his life because he deserves it. This guy is a fraud. If not for his father the Navy Admiral, he would never had gotten into the Navel Academy since his grades were below average. As General Wesley Clark said…”I don’t think riding in a fighter plane and being shot down is a qualification to be President.” That from a military man much more qualified than McCain. Meanwhile this knucklehead Lieberman goes around saying he thinks that terrorist will attack the US in 2009. Another flunkie with his fear program again. Seems like McCain has all these flunkies trying to scare everyone into voting for McCain. McCain has been riding on his father’s hooks, and living off the taxpayers all his life. What does he know about what the average American goes through…NOTHING. He is a lying dishonest man who has no values and who would stoop to any level to get what he wants. Anybody who votes for this man either is very shallow themselves, or very ignorant. Not what America needs.
Posted by: Jake | June 29, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Yes, Obama has flip flopped on a few things. But…
McCain’s list is at 48 major policy flip flops and growing by the week it seems like. Catch up on the flip flop commentary on the link below:
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/15924.html
McCain’s flip flop list is little to extreme for my tastes. I want a president who will be honest with me, has a set of principals and will not go against them just to win an election.
Remember: The McCain of 2000 would not vote for the McCain of 2008
Posted by: jk | June 29, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
how anyone can vote for the traitor songbird johnny mac is beyond me. the guy gave up valuable information to the chinese and his own cellmates call him (to this day) The Songbird
he finished 364th out of 369 in his class (where he never would have gotten accepted if not for his dad, sound familiar?)
Posted by: soupy sales | June 29, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
McCain is a man. Obama is a puppet.
Who knows who’s controlling BHO at any given moment?
Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 29, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
I honestly don’t see where a change of facts necessitating a change in action could be called distrustful.
The Repubs have a war chest of over $53 million. The Dems have $4 million. So if both McCain and Obama took the public money of $80 million each, that would leave the Dems with a total of $84 million vs. the Repubs with $135 million. Obama made the only choice that made sense, skip the public money paid with tax dollars and continue to rely on donations from ordinary Americans that have fueled his campaign thus far. Don’t we want a president that can see how budgets work? Don’t we want a president that can adjust to changing facts? This isn’t a flip-flop, this is facing reality. Obama having common sense is something that many career politicians aren’t familiar with, if the unbalanced budgets and extra-ordinary waste in the federal government are any indication.
Posted by: Lydia | June 29, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Get that dangerously inexperienced, flip flopping, arrogant Obama. Just Say NO TO OBAMA!
Posted by: NoToObama | Jun 29, 2008 2:59:44 PM
4444444444444444444444444
Uppity is what you really mean when you say arrogant.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-ridley/when-rove-calls-obama-arr_b_109639.html
http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/index.php/2008/06/23/arrogant-is-the-new-uppity-take-two/
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
John McCain, the man who voted against his own immigration bill and who has flip flopped on nearly every issue during his campaign is now questioning the trustworthiness of Obama? McCain has flip flopped so many times he has confused himself. Heck, he doesn’t even know the difference between a Shia and a Sunni and yet he claims to be an authority on the war in Iraq. And this is the best candidate the Republicans could offer? If you think things are bad now, and they are, just see how much worse it will get if McCain gets elected.
Posted by: Drew Hoffman | June 29, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
And where have all the real journalists gone? Why does ABC and certain other ‘news’ organizations take statements from campaigns, publish them as fact without checking the validity of them? Is real journalism dead?
Posted by: Lydia | June 29, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
The Republican candidates seem to be distancing themselves from the GOP brand. The latest ploy is to refer to themselves as ‘Independents’, ‘Progressives’, or ‘Bipartisans’; and avoiding being called a ‘Republican’.
Interesting.
Posted by: Larry | June 29, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
OBAMA UNFIT FOR COMMANDER.
Posted by: Nicholas | June 29, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
“Baracks talk to the nation after he is elected”
Baracks Bills -
1. 2006 Transparency bill = expose corrupt lobby $ that lobbyist give to politicians so we the people can either impeach them or not re-elect them
2. TECH PLAN = 2007 = http://www.USAspending.gov = expose all government spending so the citzens can see where their tax money goes
3. 2008 = SUNSHINE bill = SUNLIGHT FOUNDATION = http://www.sunlightfoundation.com/ = http://www.sunshineweek.org/sunshineweek/candidates = EXPOSE future spending. This is acomplished as Barack and his newly elected cabinet point out to WE THE PEOPLE , negative porkbarrel spending so we the people can rally against a certain senator or congress person or committee to stop it before it goes up for vote or support it if it is good for we the people = honest government finally controlled by WE THE PEOPLE. Who knows maybe one day in the future we won’t need politicians as we the people stay involved in what is going on in all 3 branches of government and we use the computer to approve the direction of our country / government.
Barack will be holding weekly / monthly speeches, to WE THE PEOPLE, guiding them as to which negative earmark / porkbarrel spending should be stopped (removed from a future bill) by the people rallying together online before a bill with that earmark goes up for vote!
…………………………….
Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL)
Obama has outlined an ambitious transparency plan that incorporates technology to “help connect government to its citizens and engage citizens in a democracy.”
Among the proposals in Obama’s plan to open government are: putting government data online in accessible formats; airing live webcasts of agency meetings; restoring scientific integrity; allowing people to track federal grants, contracts, earmarks and lobbyist contacts online; and allowing five days for public to review and comment on legislation online before its signed.
In an October 2007 speech, Obama pledged to “turn the page on a growing empire of classified information, and restore the balance we’ve lost between the necessarily secret and the necessity of openness in a democratic society by creating a new National Declassification Center.”
Past is Prologue
One of Obama’s most visible Senate actions on the open government front was his co-sponsorship of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act, which went into effect Jan. 1, 2008 with the launch of USAspending.gov, a Web site that gives people access to information on government contracts, grants and other awards.
As an Illinois state senator, Obama co-sponsored the Verbatim Record Bill, requiring public agencies to video or audio record closed door meetings, The First Amendment Center reported, noting the law was the first of its kind enacted by any state.
Obama is the only remaining candidate to have signed the Reason Foundation’s Oath of Presidential Transparency, and, according to The Washington Post he is the only leading candidate to have released his income tax returns.
………………………………
What other aspects do you seek Barack to address to the nation?
Posted by: Danielle Clarke 50+ white woman | June 29, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Have you noticed that posts on this blog keep disappearing? Not the really inflammatory posts, the more moderate ones? Like this one?
You no sooner get an answer written to the blog, and the blog you are answering has been deleted. Makes your post seem silly, don’t it?
Posted by: Bobby | June 29, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
((( “McCain has frequently mentioned his desire for the campaign with Obama to be ‘respectful,’ but has been ramping up more personal attacks on Obama in recent weeks.” )))
There you have it: John McCain’s word cannot be trusted.
Posted by: buddhistMonkey | June 29, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
HuffPost’s dollar2donut:
“his wife fights five years to get him out of that hell-hole in Vietnam. She gets in a car accident and is disabled…he returns, cheats on her with Cindy, then leaves his wife and marries Cindy one month later so she can finance his poiltical career. Yeah, that’s the kind of man you can trust all right!”
A man who leaves his wife for another woman in time of adversity has no backbone as a man, not to talk of shame and integrity.
This is your straight talk express?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Jake,
I think you and I agree on the substance here. I also would assume that you are irritated, just as I, that the 10.6% Medicare cuts will go into effect July 1 because the Republican Senate and Bush are pandering to Medicare Advantage programs. McCain chose not to vote and had he been a ‘maverick’ he would have sided with us, ordinary citizens and the Democrats and they could have reached cloture at 60 votes. He can put his money where his mouth is when they get cloture when Kennedy comes back and then try and override Bush’s upcoming veto.
Again, in generalities we agree. As for how the taxes break down, if you go to money cnn com, you can search for and they list the candidates tax proposals. Between $220k and $603k you’d pay about $12 more under Obama’s plan and $7871 less under McCain. If you are over $603k then you get a big stick and pay $115k more with Obama’s plan versus $45k less under McCain’s. And if you make over 2.9million, you’ll pay over $700k more under Obama and will save more than $250k under McCain.
Again, it’s really the upper 1% who are getting the stick and that’s if Obama’s plan is fully implemented (which is nearly impossible).
Posted by: doc | June 29, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Certainly none of you right wingers can be trusted. You all are easily manipulated by key words that republican political experts like to pound away until you believe it. I only trust that right wing republicans=bad for the country, democrats=good for the country. “More of the same”=bad for the country. “Change”=good for the country. I’ve heard Obama speak and have actually gone as far as going to his website to read his positions! (You guys should try that!) Younger, spiritual, visionary, and smart, and few point this out but our allies opinion heavily favors Obama as well. Obama is a far better choice. Not gonna get caught up in Republican crowd manipulation word play any more and you shouldn’t either. Nuff said.
Posted by: Scotti | June 29, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Yes SALLY and it was the Republican Party to which all the former racist Democrats turned after Brown vs the Board of Education. What you have to understand is that the GOP of today is not the GOP of Lincoln, or Eisenhower it is the GOP of Richard Nixon and his Southern strategy. It is the party of the Ku-Klux-Klan. The party of Jesse Helmns, of Strom Thurmond and countless others who changed their party affiliation from Democrat to Republican. The reason for that was that the Republicans gave them aid and comfort.
Abraham Lincoln if he returned today would have nothing to do with what the GOP is today.
John McCain should explain why he opposed the Martin Luther king day.
Posted by: Just Saying | June 29, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
McCain, is prenup not all about trust?
How do you expect to oversee what is about the largest economy in the world, when, within your own household economy, the wife dearest cannot bring herself to trust you?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
McCain is talking about trust. Here is the pot calling the kettle black- Interesting. I am truly upset w/ Obama of recent on the FISA issue and have fired lots of letters to his campaign, but I am not against him and he has just flip-flopped on a handful of issues -
As for John McCain, here is a list McCain flip-flops:
Here’s the full list (along with a bloggers closing commentary…
* McCain supported the drilling moratorium; now he’s against it.
* McCain strongly opposes a windfall-tax on oil company profits. Three weeks earlier, he was perfectly comfortable with the idea.
* McCain thought Bush’s warrantless-wiretap program circumvented the law; now he believes the opposite.
* McCain defended “privatizing” Social Security. Now he says he’s against privatization (though he actually still supports it.)
Wait, I’m not done with the last two weeks yet….
* McCain wanted to change the Republican Party platform to protect abortion rights in cases of rape and incest. Now he doesn’t.
* McCain thought the estate tax was perfectly fair. Now he believes the opposite.
* He opposed indefinite detention of terrorist suspects. When the Supreme Court reached the same conclusion, he called it “one of the worst decisions in the history of this country.”
* McCain said he would “not impose a litmus test on any nominee.” He used to promise the opposite.
And these come after these other reversals from April and May:
* McCain believes the telecoms should be forced to explain their role in the administration’s warrantless surveillance program as a condition for retroactive immunity. He used to believe the opposite.
* McCain supported storing spent nuclear fuel at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. Now he believes the opposite.
* McCain supported moving “towards normalization of relations” with Cuba. Now he believes the opposite.
* McCain believed the U.S. should engage in diplomacy with Hamas. Now he believes the opposite.
* McCain believed the U.S. should engage in diplomacy with Syria. Now he believes the opposite.
* He argued the NRA should not have a role in the Republican Party’s policy making. Now he believes the opposite.
* McCain supported his own lobbying-reform legislation from 1997. Now he doesn’t.
* He wanted political support from radical televangelists like John Hagee and Rod Parsley. Now he doesn’t.
* McCain supported the Lieberman/Warner legislation to combat global warming. Now he doesn’t.
And these are the flip-flops I’ve noticed earlier:
* McCain pledged in February 2008 that he would not, under any circumstances, raise taxes. Specifically, McCain was asked if he is a “‘read my lips’ candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?” referring to George H.W. Bush’s 1988 pledge. “No new taxes,” McCain responded. Two weeks later, McCain said, “I’m not making a ‘read my lips’ statement, in that I will not raise taxes.”
* McCain is both for and against a “rogue state rollback” as a focus of his foreign policy vision.
* McCain says he considered and did not consider joining John Kerry’s Democratic ticket in 2004.
* In 1998, he championed raising cigarette taxes to fund programs to cut underage smoking, insisting that it would prevent illnesses and provide resources for public health programs. Now, McCain opposes a $0.61-per-pack tax increase, won’t commit to supporting a regulation bill he’s co-sponsoring, and has hired Philip Morris’ former lobbyist as his senior campaign adviser.
* McCain has changed his economic worldview on multiple occasions.
* McCain has changed his mind about a long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq on multiple occasions.
* McCain is both for and against attacking Barack Obama over his former pastor at his former church.
* McCain believes Americans are both better and worse off than they were before Bush took office.
* McCain is both for and against earmarks for Arizona.
* McCain believes his endorsement from radical televangelist John Hagee was both a good and bad idea.
* McCain’s first mortgage plan was premised on the notion that homeowners facing foreclosure shouldn’t be “rewarded” for acting “irresponsibly.” His second mortgage plan took largely the opposite position.
* McCain vowed, if elected, to balance the federal budget by the end of his first term. Soon after, he decided he would no longer even try to reach that goal.
* In February 2008, McCain reversed course on prohibiting waterboarding.
* McCain used to champion the Law of the Sea convention, even volunteering to testify on the treaty’s behalf before a Senate committee. Now he opposes it.
* McCain was a co-sponsor of the DREAM Act, which would grant legal status to illegal immigrants’ kids who graduate from high school. Now he’s against it.
* On immigration policy in general, McCain announced in February 2008 that he would vote against his own legislation.
* In 2006, McCain sponsored legislation to require grassroots lobbying coalitions to reveal their financial donors. In 2007, after receiving “feedback” on the proposal, McCain told far-right activist groups that he opposes his own measure.
* McCain said before the war in Iraq, “We will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” Four years later, McCain said he knew all along that the war in Iraq war was “probably going to be long and hard and tough.”
* McCain said he was the “greatest critic” of Rumsfeld’s failed Iraq policy. In December 2003, McCain praised the same strategy as “a mission accomplished.” In March 2004, he said, “I’m confident we’re on the right course.” In December 2005, he said, “Overall, I think a year from now, we will have made a fair amount of progress if we stay the course.”
* McCain went from saying he would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade to saying the exact opposite.
* McCain went from saying gay marriage should be allowed, to saying gay marriage shouldn’t be allowed.
* McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but then decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks.
* McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.
* On a related note, he said 2005 that he opposed the tax cuts because they were “too tilted to the wealthy.” By 2007, he denied ever having said this, and insisted he opposed the cuts because of increased government spending.
* In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.
* McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June 2007, he abandoned his own legislation.
* McCain opposed a holiday to honor Martin Luther King, Jr., before he supported it.
* McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.
* McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.
* McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.
* McCain decided in 2000 that he didn’t want anything to do with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, believing he “would taint the image of the ‘Straight Talk Express.’” Kissinger is now the Honorary Co-Chair for his presidential campaign in New York.
Confronted with the inconsistencies in McCain’s record in March, the senator’s aides told the New York Times that the senator “has evolved rather than switched positions in his 25-year career.” That’s a perfectly sensible spin — when a politician holds one position, and then, for apparently political reasons, decides to embrace the polar opposite position, it’s only natural for his or her aides to say the politician’s position has “evolved.”
But in McCain’s case, the spin is wholly unfulfilling. First, McCain sells himself as a pol who never sways with the wind, and whose willingness to be consistent in the face of pressure is proof of his character. Second, Republicans have spent the last four years or so making policy reversals the single most serious political crime in presidential politics. The dreaded “flip-flop” is, according to the GOP, the latest cardinal sin for someone seeking national office.
And if we’re playing by Republican rules, McCain’s “evolutions” should be a fairly serious problem. I’m beginning to think they might be.
Posted by: kanobi11 | June 29, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
HuffPost’s dollar2donut:
“his wife fights five years to get him out of that hell-hole in Vietnam. She gets in a car accident and is disabled…he returns, cheats on her with Cindy, then leaves his wife and marries Cindy one month later so she can finance his poiltical career. Yeah, that’s the kind of man you can trust all right!”
A man who leaves his wife for another woman in time of adversity has no backbone as a man, not to talk of shame and integrity.
This is your straight talk express?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
do most voters know Obama and what he stand for – - not really. There seems to be one thing after another, first no flag pins of flag salute, now a flag pin. In 2007 Obama is questioned on his negligence in providing support at Walter Reed Hospital, and now the media follows him on a visit to the VA hospital. His book tells about his mom, who was an atheist who became pregnant at 17yrs old to a older foreign student studying in Hawaii on a US grant. His father could not legally marry his mother because his father already had a wife in Kenya. He claims his mom needed to go on food stamps; but this occurred when his grandparents have good jobs as Bank VP and furniture store owner. He says he could never disown Rev Wright, and then does so based on voter polls during a lull in the primaries. He helped get government awards for his friends, including Rezko, and we discoverd that the community work performed is now questioned as below quality standards. Now it’s reported that his campaign representative agreed that Obama would like to have a monkey-god idol, which would match the one that Obama carries in his pocket as a good luck charm. http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=68156
Posted by: James | Jun 29, 2008 3:05:34 PM
44444444444444444444444444
I’m sure most everyone that lied us into war with Iraq wore a flag pin. so wearing one does not prove you’re a patriot. Next you saying his mother could not possibly be on food stamps if his grandparents had good jobs as v.p.? That a stupid remark given some famous, rich people have relatives that are not well off and need government assistance. You also say he carries a monkey idol around in his pocket. How do you know it’s not something a voter gave him for good luck or something? Moreover, Even if it is his carring it does not necessarily proves he believes in hindu religion. Many atheists and agnostics wear the cross for fashion. So wearing or carring something is not absolute truth.
Boy you’re a piece of work shilling for mccain, rove and the republicans.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
This is not very hard to figure out. The choice between Obama and McCain is this simple. Do you want a man who thinks the old ways of the last 7 years is better, or a man who wants to change that direction. Do you want a man who is stuck in the 70s and believes war is good, or a man that wants peace and dialogue before war. Do you want a man who has always lived the life of luxury and comfort, or a man who knows what being poor and hard work means. Do you want a man who is not very bright or do you want a man who demonstrate the ability think intelligently. This is a ground ball, either you want a life of continuing hell or a brighter future.
Posted by: Jake | June 29, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Sally – Yes, the Republican Party used to to good things. That’s why it seesm so pathetic now.
When the segregationist Southern Democrats all switched to the Republicans after the Civil Rights Act, it was all downhill from there.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Mr. Vote4Peace,
Your candidate suggested that a large percentage of Hillary supporters were actually republican stooge followers of talk radio hosts. He did this in a calculating fashion to try and dry up support for Hillary – who wants to be associated with Rush Limbaugh? If there were any such idiots they were nowhere to be seen in the DROVES of Hillary supporters and they would have been rejected. Yet Obama’s camp would snidely make these acusations anyway, knowing them to be false. You can play the denial game all you want, but your candidate offended me then and fools like you who claim it never happened continue to offend. Your logic is backward and your retort is insipid.
Posted by: Go4It | June 29, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Yeah it is interesting, nearly all polls done in the countries of all of our allies overwhelmingly support Obama about 7 to 3…yet somehow the logic being proported here is that McCain is the best choice for foreign relations. How? How does that make any logical sense? McCain will come into office with 70% of the world already predisposed to dislike him…HOW does that put McCain in a better position? If anything a vote for McCain for foreign relations ability (which his main platform so it IS relevant) is about as ironic as you get!
Posted by: Jane | June 29, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Good list @kanobi11-
Interesting how the GOP jumps on Obama on the public finance issue -
Here are some more evidences of John McCain’shypocrisy
Reference: http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/06/8763_mccain_hypocris.html
Recently, the McCain campaign has sharply criticized Barack Obama’s decision to become the first general election presidential candidate since the 1970s to opt out of the public financing system, a decision Obama can afford because of his stunning success with hundreds of thousands of low-dollar donors. As David notes at the link above, the McCain campaign said Obama’s decision “undermines his call for a new type of politics.”
But McCain, a longtime foe of Big Money in politics, once had a friendlier view of presidential fundraisers like Obama.
Here he is on the Fox News show “On the Record,” in January 2004:
“I think it’s wonderful that Howard Dean was able to use the Internet, $50, $75, $100 contributions. That’s what we want it to be all about. We want average citizensto contribute small amounts of money, and that’s a commitment to a campaign.
So I’m for that. I think it’s a great thing. I think the Internet is going to change Americanpolitics for the better.”
And here he is on MSNBC’s “Hardball,” in June 2004:
“The Internet is generating more and more people involved in the political process with relatively small campaign contributions, $50, $75. That’s wonderful. No longer can an office holder call up a CEO or a trial lawyer or a union leader and say,
I need $1 million. And, by the way, your legislation is up before my committee again.”
Seems to me like McCain keeps flipping and flopping even w/ his own self —-
Posted by: thetruth | June 29, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Senator Obama’s Anti-Smear Army has been out in force this weekend. Unfortunately, they have been smearing Senator McCain and many bloggers who support him. But the Army has shown no proof that the postings were lies or distortions about Senator Obama. It is simply attack, attack, attack. It really is getting disgusting.
Posted by: Martin | June 29, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Go4It – I don’t know what you think Obama said, but Rush did tell his supporters to go vote for Hillary, so it was a reasonable assumption to think that many of them did.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Martin – What is so “disgusting” about defending someone against smears? I have even defended McCain against smears, although obviously I am more focussed on Obama.
Was there a particular smear that you wanted us to challenge?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Senator Obama’s Anti-Smear Army has been out in force this weekend. Unfortunately, they have been smearing Senator McCain and many bloggers who support him. But the Army has shown no proof that the postings were lies or distortions about Senator Obama. It is simply attack, attack, attack. It really is getting disgusting.
Posted by: Martin | Jun 29, 2008 5:49:41 PM
4444444444444444444444444444
What you really mean is, you could not get away with your usual fear and smear campaign against Obama and you don’t like it. I guess martin is smartin’ lol!
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
@martin,
You crack me – You just need to google the internet to find McCain flipping and flopping all over the place – The GOP and McCain have been smearing Obama all over the place, calling him a muslim, etc… DO YOU HAVE A PROOF FOR THEM??
More on the list of McCain flip-flops and lies here: http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/15924.html
Posted by: thetruth | June 29, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Simply put McCain is too old to be president. The constitution made an error when it set a minimum age of 35 to be eligible to serve as president and did not set a maximum age of 60 to 65.
This is my main problem, it is unfair for him to be forcing himself on the nation. The man will be 76 when his first term is up this must mean that he intends to run for only one term. Who believes that a lame duck president can accomplish anything.
I do not believe that anyone from any political party should be seeking this position after they have passed the age of 60.
Now before you idiots start attacking me let me tell you that I am 61 and a that I do vote Republican. This time around I am either not voting or voting for Obama with my fingers crossed and hoping for the best.
THE MAN IS JUST TOO OLD.
Posted by: Truth Sayer | June 29, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
In January in an interview in Business Week with Maria Bartiromo, Obama said only people making less than 75k would be getting tax relief. So I guess anyone making over that is rich and will see higher taxes, unless he has flipped flopped on that too. Anyone having mutual funds outside of a retirement account, will see an increased cap gains tax even if they don;t sell the mutual fund. That took a lot of peoples money during the tech bubble. Retirement accounts will be taxed at ordinary income which also will get s boost in taxes. Raising the cap is a mistake. Taking 6.2% more each out of business and people who make over 89k. Oil companies make an average of 8.5% profit.How about healthcare facilities? 48%. Publishing, periodicals, magazines is 34%. Information delivery services, 23%. Silver is 22%. Application software industry is 22%. Shipping, 21%. Well, not anymore. Copper is 19%. Tobacco products, 19%. Drug manufacturers, 17%. Insurance brokers, 16. Beverages, wineries, distilleries, 15%. Long distance carriers, 15.8%. I mean, railroads, railroads, 13.9%. Steel and iron, 13.8. Cigarettes, 13.7. Integrated circuits, semiconductors, 13.6. Money center banks, 10.8. Hotel/motels, 10.6. Asset management, 10.5. Beverage, Brewers, 10.5. Resorts and casinos, resorts and casinos are 10.5. Casinos are 10.5. Oil is 8.5. Hedge fund makes 81.7. So what is a windfall or do you just have to ask what Comrade Obama wants to tax? He also will not allow drilling of the coast where Cuba will be drilling, or in Anwr or allow rules to be developed for shale oil processing in 3 western states where we have 1.7 trillion barrels locked in rock. Democrats have defeated all the projects in the last 30 years resulting in lack of supply. Do all businesses have to be not-for-profit for the Demcrats.Obama is just another tax and spend liberal supported by MoveOn.org, DailyKos and George Soros. He has flipped on some many issues, he cannot be trusted.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Doc…At some point these Republicans will try to outsource Medicare and Social Security to the insurance industry, Banks, and Wall Street. They will continue to cut Medicare to the point that you would have no choice but to enroll in a private insurance company that will provide less benefits, higher deductibles, and caps. For seniors on fixed incomes this means no health coverage. Social Security will see less benefits for everyone under privitization of SS. These programs are the lifelines of many and were created to benefit our great society. However, Republicans like McCain could care less, he has the best insurance money can buy, and a 100% disability pension on top of his salary and/or Senate pension if he retires. He’s wealthy and set for life. It doesn’t affect him at all. But to many, including our seniors this program will be devestating.
Posted by: Jake | June 29, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Hmm…FDR, democrat and Truman, democrat saved the world, JFK stood up directly to the Soviets and saved us from nuclear war. Carter was the first to seriously take on the oil producing middle east and terrorists. Clinton, despite a hostile congress, worked it out and led the country through it’s most glorious years to date. The only notable Republican of the last 65 years is Reagan, and he is only notable for being a good actor and being the first to run up the national debt and defense spending to astronomical levels. Someone on here saw Nixon as great. He was a crimanal and participated in breaking and entering and burglarly, street level crime! Bush our current president, it has been noted, has broken our FISA laws which wasn’t necessary and usurped the authority of congress. Bush Sr didn’t finish the job in Iraq when we did have a full blown army already there and a good reason authorized by the UN to take it. I just don’t see it, where have the FDR, Truman, JFK, Clinton-equivelant republican presidents been?
Posted by: Scotti | June 29, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
jschmidt – Who do you suggest we should tax? Poor people?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Wonderful!!!!!!!!! Obama fans and McCain fans are competing “My crook is better than your crook”. For anyone who wants to look for someone you can trust. You don’t have to look very far. Look at your parents. What have you done for your parents lately?????
Posted by: crookedpolitician | June 29, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Hey Peace 4 You,
I guess I believe in people more than party lines. I always have.
I have just rewarded your nastiness with another contribution in your name. Cheers.
———-
Dear Peace4You,
I want to thank you for taking the time to visit my campaign website, http://www.JohnMcCain.com. In addition, thank you so much for your generous contribution of $200.
As this campaign progresses, I look forward to working with you as we continue to build an unmatched campaign organization. Your support today will help me recruit more people to our effort and allow me to continue my straight-talking conversation with America’s voters. Our country is the finest nation and greatest force for good in the world, and I’m honored by your confidence in me to lead further into the 21st century.
Posted by: Go4It | June 29, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
…said the guy who talks like a saint and votes like a devil on torture.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | June 29, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
It’s just like an old geezer to not trust anything new. This reminds me of an elderly uncle of mine. He doesn’t trust the Internet, for example. He can’t use a cell phone. He thinks new neighbors are looking to steal things. As people get older, their worlds become smaller, and it’s easy to be a pessimist when your health is failing. It’s sad seeing McCain, because I think he forgot that he was once a vibrant young man, too.
Posted by: MJ Parlier | June 29, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Truthsayer…not a young man myself, but I agree with you. This is not a job for a man of McCain’s age. You wouldn’t want a heart or brain surgeon operating on you at 76, four years from now, or even at 72 were he to become President in 2009. This is a job that requires a sharp, steady, and clear mind at all times, and an abundance of energy and abilities to meet the challenges ahead. Let’s not kid ourselves here, sure there are many good things people can do at his age, but being President of the United States is the most challenging and difficult job in the world. Not something to take so lightly.
Posted by: Jake | June 29, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
GO4IT, You state that if the Rush Limbaugh supporters had followed his advice and supported Hillary Clinton then they would have been rejected. How exactly were you going to reject a vote in a state which allowed voting for any party.
As I think I stated before I voted for Hillary and supported her, and will support her again when she runs, but I unlike you must be true to my principles and vote in the best interest of my children and grand children. I fail to see the point you are making, and I am very suspicious of you.
I absolutely cannot understand how any supporter of Hillary Clinton could support a republican like McCain. What McCain and the Republicans have said about Hillary is much more disgusting than any of the supposed slights you reference from th Obama campaign. I did not once hear McCain condemn the filthy things his party said about the Clinton family.
I do know some of my former Clinton supporting friends aho have gone to McCain, but they at least were quite frank in stating that they had a problem with his race.
I respectfully suggest that you are either not really a former Clinton supporter or are have race based problems with Obama. Come on now tell us the truth, it will always set you free.
Posted by: Just Saying | June 29, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Yeah, McCain claims to no beholden to special interests but yet he has had lobbyists running his campaign (which wasn’t even in the news until just last month). He doesn’t want to let Obama keep the small donations of millions of Americans, well of coarse not because those small donations have really added up! And meanwhile McCain will still be beholden to special interests because he get his money from his party and so he is beholden to the party and all of it’s special interests. If anything, Obama is beholden to the country itself as sensible republicans and independents have also contributed to his campaign. A much better choice for Obama and I don’t blame him a bit.
Posted by: Jane | June 29, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
The Republican party can say what Hillary couldn’t: ‘You can’t trust Obama’
And you know what, they’re right.
Posted by: Mark | June 29, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
I have been listening to two governors who have spent the last ten minutes accusing the other’s candidate of flip-flopping.
How about if we quit using those words? If political candidates didn’t change their minds on issues from time to time, I would seriously question whether or not they are using their minds.
It is getting so tiresome!
Posted by: comickey | June 29, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
You don’t need to raise taxes. You need to take the waste out of the budget. More money is not the answer. Congress needs to spend the money like it is their own. Obama will continue the waste, the pork and rewarding his backers, except the little backers. McCain is the only one that wants to take the waste out of government.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
There is little doubt that the paid mercenary army of professional bloggers that I have read Obama pays is out in full force today. Do you guys get a higher rate when you work the weekend?
Posted by: bb | June 29, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
HuffPost’s dollar2donut:
“his wife fights five years to get him out of that hell-hole in Vietnam. She gets in a car accident and is disabled…he returns, cheats on her with Cindy, then leaves his wife and marries Cindy one month later so she can finance his poiltical career. Yeah, that’s the kind of man you can trust all right!”
A man who leaves his wife for another woman in time of adversity has no backbone as a man, not to talk of shame and integrity.
This is your straight talk express?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
You don’t need to raise taxes. You need to take the waste out of the budget. More money is not the answer. Congress needs to spend the money like it is their own. Obama will continue the waste, the pork and rewarding his backers, except the little backers. McCain is the only one that wants to take the waste out of government.
Posted by: jschmidt | Jun 29, 2008 6:18:54 PM
444444444444444444444444444
McCain is a republican, they have recklessly spent money to the point of bankruptcy. And you want us to believe the big business, lobbyist backed mccain will change course? Keep dreaming.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
I think Obama should take Gen Wesley Clark as his VP and Hillary should be his Secretary of State. Clark would bring his military record to the ticket. The Clintons are still beloved around the world, she’d still be in line to be president as Secretary of State and the position has much more responsibility than that of vice president. That ticket would be awesome!
Posted by: GeorgeNoMore | June 29, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Jake- privatizing Social Security may be the only way to save it. By law, SS money cannot be invested in the stock market, yet over the long term the stock market has returned more money than any other investment. Take a dollar into SS now, and next year it is worth 3% or so less. SS money needs to be invested and I recommend taking 1/2% of what is supposed to be in the fund and put in the market. I say supposed to be because all the SS money goes in the general revenue hole. Other than raising the cap and then not allowing people who pay on the raised cap to benefit from it, or reducing benefits, what are the choices? SS was never envisioned as a pension plan but as a safety net. But Obama has pledged to have a redistribution of wealth and he will take who he feels is rich and give to the poor. With the Democrats in power in Congress he can be a dictator and do what he wants. There will be no checks on his power if the Dems have 60 in the Senate and that will be very bad for the country. Obama will never abandon his left supporters of MoveOn, Daily Kos and George Soros. So he will rule from the left.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Who’s more trustworthy? Hum, let me think… Nah, the more I think the more I know McCain is the man! He has my vote. Obama is an opportunist and I will not serve him to reach his egotistic goals. Me, Me, Me is all in which he thinks; himself!
Posted by: AGT-R | June 29, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
jschmidt, I hardly think a Republican can tell anyone how to not waste money. They shipped several billion dollars of cash money to Iraq, and POOF, it was gone. What kind of moron sends real cash to a war zone? We got ripped off, and it’s no thanks to McCain and the GOP. No one can give us a straight answer about where our tax dollars have gone. These Republican attacks are reminding people to question Republican’s integrity. When McCain makes statements like this, people start thinking about the past seven years of nothing but greed, corruption, stupidity and lies. It’s a long list, too. Are you sure you want to remind America what the GOP has been up to for seven years?
Posted by: MJ Parlier | June 29, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
I don’t think the Obama supporters get it. When you demean McCain it has little effect on me or millions of other former Clinton supporters. I’m not voting for McCain, I’m voting against Obama in an effort to send a message to the Democratic Party and the biased segments of the media who virtually rigged the primary. We grow stronger with each day.
Posted by: bedy | June 29, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Merri- You have heard Obama only talk about spending more. He has talked about using the Iraq money he will not spend but we didn;t have that money in the first place. To Obama that is money to be spent. McCain is the only one that has not talked about raising taxes on people making over 75k as Obama wants to do. (In January in an interview in Business Week with Maria Bartiromo, Obama said only people making less than 75k would be getting tax relief. So I guess anyone making over that is rich and will see higher taxes). McCain has never supported pork projects. Obama has and has taken money from companies for legislation passed. McCain is the best person to hold back spending. Obama will bankrupt us.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
I don’t think the McCain supporters get it. When you demean Obama it has little effect on me or millions of other Obama supporters. I’m voting for Obama, AND against McCain in an effort to send a message to the Republican Party and the biased segments of the media who virtually say nothing regarding McCain’s flip flops and memory lapses. We grow stronger with each day.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
bedy On the same note, your right wing disdain and your attempts to demean Obama through dirty politics is only hardening the votes of millions of people who will be voting for him come November.
Posted by: Scotti | June 29, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Obama’s attacks on McCain are never personal! Obama has decided against taking campaign finance because he has run a grassroots funded campaign so successful that it is clear that he represents the will of the American people. As for his position on FISA, lets look at what it accomplishes and why it is urgent according to Obama.
1.“it is a marked improvement over the Protect America Act”
2.“an important tool in the fight against terrorism will continue……
3.……the President’s illegal program of warrantless surveillance will be over”
4.“It restores FISA and existing criminal wiretap statutes as the exclusive means to conduct surveillance…”
5.“….makes clear that the President cannot circumvent the law and disregard the civil liberties of the American people”
6.“It firmly re-establishes basic judicial oversight over all domestic surveillance in the future”
7.“guarantees a thorough review by the Inspectors General of our national security agencies to determine what took place in the past, and ensures that there will be accountability going forward”
8.“It is not all that I would want. But given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay.” Senator Barack Obama
Posted by: Samantha | June 29, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Obama ‘lacks experience’? Look where all the ‘experience’ of the last 8 years has brought us.
It’s 1932 all over again folks, you have a chance to vote for another once in a generation leader and I’m not talking out the old guy who calls everyone friend (probably because he can’t remember their names)
Posted by: Donnat | June 29, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Quote straigh from Obama’s web site: “Obama will restore fairness to the tax code and provide 150 million workers the tax relief they need. Obama will create a new “Making Work Pay” tax credit of up to $500 per person, or $1,000 per working family. The “Making Work Pay” tax credit will completely eliminate income taxes for 10 million Americans.” That’s awesome. And that’s not hurting the wealthy contrary to republican dogma. The poor spend money more than the wealthy, the economy will rise, and a good economy will only help small business owners and rising stock will only help the wealthy, not hurt them. Don’t believe the republican dogma. Obama only wants to roll back taxes on the wealthy to where they were during the booming Clinton years where more new US millionares were made than ever before or since. Bush’s tax cut for the wealthy was only supposed to be temporary and it didn’t help this country at all. It’s pretty greedy in my opinion that the wealthy don’t pay a little more for the civilization upon who’s backs they ride in 300 foot yachts.
Posted by: Scotti | June 29, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Scotti:
…”Where have
the FDR, Truman, JFK, Clinton-equivelant republican presidents been?”
That was then.
This is the here and now!
THIS Democratic party is a travesty of it’s name!
They chose and bet on the wrong horse early on, refused to open their eyes, and now stand a good chance of losing the race!
Nothing niggled the DNC’s closed minds when it came to B O.
But this is not the time for the head of a senatorial committee who could never find the time to hold even one meeting….. not the time for a newby senator whose most enduring acts were his 130 calls of “present”… not the time for a man who talks out of both sides of his mouth and attracts questionable associates to him like a magnet… not the time for big plans and promises of change without income producing solutions to make them happen…
NOT the time for flowery words
NOT the time for B O!
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY!!!
Posted by: Questioner | June 29, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
MJ- Yes the last decade of corruption. Let’s remember Mr. Jefferson- D- La, with bribe money in his freezer, and still in office. Let’s remember Mr. Murtha-D -Pa, who got caught up in Abscam and who said he wouldn;t be taking the money, just yet. Let remember the recent questionable conduct of Mr. Dodd-D-CT, my own state, who seemed to not understand he was getting a good deal on his countrywide mortgage while he was passing legislation to benefit Countrywide. Let’s remember Mr. Obama took campaign money from companies and then passed legislation for them. Remeber Mr. Rezko. Yes remember Republicans do not have a lock on greed or corruption and Mrs. Pelosi has done nothing to make the House squeaky clean. If you think this will improve with more Democrats you are sadly mistaken. And McCain has been the only one talking about holding down spending. Obama’s answer to everything is taxes.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Scotti:
…”Where have
the FDR, Truman, JFK, Clinton-equivelant republican presidents been?”
That was then.
This is the here and now!
THIS Democratic party is a travesty of it’s name!
They chose and bet on the wrong horse early on, refused to open their eyes, and now stand a good chance of losing the race!
Nothing niggled the DNC’s closed minds when it came to B O.
But this is not the time for the head of a senatorial committee who could never find the time to hold even one meeting….. not the time for a newby senator whose most enduring acts were his 130 calls of “present”… not the time for a man who talks out of both sides of his mouth and attracts questionable associates to him like a magnet… not the time for big plans and promises of change without income producing solutions to make them happen…
NOT the time for flowery words
NOT the time for B O!
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY!!!
Posted by: Questioner | Jun 29, 2008 7:23:03 PM
44444444444444444444444444
You’ve gotta be blind not to see the republicans are a zillion times worst with no hope for improvement.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
omnibus, lascar, Brian- sorry if I don;t believe so prove the lies you are saying against McCain. And please don’t quote DailyKos and MoveOn as unbiased sources.
Scotti- and Obama said in an interview with Business Week, that only people making below 75K would see tax relief. So over 75k and your rich. Which Obama do I believe?
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Neither one of these guys is a good choice, that’s the sad thing. Rehashing the same crap over and over, nothing changes.
Posted by: Another election about nothing | June 29, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Neither one of these guys is a good choice, that’s the sad thing. Rehashing the same crap over and over, nothing changes.
Posted by: Another election about nothing | June 29, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
McCain wants to debate Obama? He’s too busy debating himself on most issues. How will he find the time? We know he won’t “work” on weekends.
Posted by: Tommy | June 29, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
John McCain hit the nail right on the head with that one!
Obama can’t be trusted as chief snake catcher, much less POTUS!!!
Posted by: Texanna | June 29, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
annoyingrabbit -
If you have evidence for anything illegal Obama has done, it should be in court. Otherwise, we can assume you are just making stuff up as usual.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Hello fellow countrymen,
I am a young voter, ready to cast my vote. But why does Obama lies on most things. He lies about his character, his middle name, his grandmother, his wife, Iraq, his pastor Wright, Rezko, NAFTA, public financing, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Washington broken system, his hyped-up experience, his heavenly hope. The problem is not just his hypocrisies and lies, it’s his fans that are defending him as though he is a demigod or something heavenly.
McCain is from a totally different generation that are so apart from mine. He flip-flopped on a few issues too. But he leaves me no doubt about his love for this country.
Posted by: young_voter | June 29, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
What do you expect? Obama is a bigoted closet Muslim who not so deep down hates America, whites, and Jews.
OBAMA 2008, the ULTIMATE SNOW JOB!
Posted by: Robert Marley | June 29, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Karl Hungus- So Democratic corruption is ok- the end justfies the mean. Pelosi promises action and doesn;t deliver. Republican corruption over the years is no worse than Democratic corruption. But it is excusable because it is Obama’s party. Pathetic
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign has accepted $54,350 from members of a law firm that in 2006 lobbied him to introduce a tax provision for a Japanese drug company with operations in Illinois, according to public records and interviews. The government estimates the provision, which became law in December 2006, will cost the treasury $800,000. Obama touts his refusal to take donations from Washington lobbyists though he accepts money from their co-workers who are not registered to lobby. Speaking after the Feb. 12 primary, he decried a “Washington game” where “lobbyists write check after check and Exxon makes record profits.” In May 2006, after the finance committee invited senators to put forward tariff suspension proposals, Obama introduced a bill requested by Astellas Pharma, which was seeking a break on an ingredient it imports from Switzerland.
Astellas employed two lobbyists with the Chicago firm of Katten Muchin Rosenman, Senate records show. Another Katten lawyer had helped the senator set up a blind trust in 2005, campaign spokesman Tommy Vietor said.
The two lobbyists have not contributed to Obama. But their law partners and associates at Katten gave $77,000 to his campaigns since 1999, according to the non-partisan CQ Moneyline.
I’m sure Obama’s supporters will excuse this. McCain does not take this type of action, money for legislation.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
It all comes down to whether or not you think we should continue the bush policies. If you think the war should continue indefinitely, while we spend $10,000,000,000 a month, and you think that bush has done well with the economy then mc-more-war is your man. If you think that it’s time we start to get out of iraq and do some positive things for the average American instead of just the top 5% then vote for Obama.
Posted by: pt | June 29, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
annoyingrabbit – so you’re okay with McCain being a puppet of the same Republican special interest groups who control Bush now? No thanks.
Posted by: nate g. | June 29, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
McCain is such a lying loser. He’s 10 times worse than he accuses ‘Obama of. This kind of dirty smear tactics will backfire on him. He is going to lose big in November if he keeps this stuff up. Totally gross.
Posted by: lisa | June 29, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Ranger Richard- I think you better examine your candidate more closely. Obama will say anything to get elected. McCain has admitted Keating 5 was not his best hour and he regrets it. But that is the only scandal he has been involved in. Obama has been in office about 144 days. No experience, no bills, no meetings as chair of the committee on Afganhistan. Last I looked Rick, everyone had a right to blog their own opinion. But it seems you as an Obama supporter can’t handle the truth that Obama is not the man for the job.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
>>>GREG:
I hope that americans who are unsure or have formed a positive opinion of Senator Obama will read the book “Audacity of Deceit”, “Obama’s s Laundry List of Lies”.
It well cleanse clogged thinking….
It will provide fuel for the fire…
and fodder for the intellect.
It will confirm that Obama’s speeches are exactly what he says they are:
“WORDS…. JUST WORDS”
from an empty suit!
Posted by: lend an ear! | June 29, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Join the millions of military families united to stop the traitor johnny “the songbird” mccain
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/
Posted by: soupy sales | June 29, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
JSCHMIDT – GIMME A BREAK PAL. MY MOM LOSES HER RETIREMENT SAVINGS BECAUSE MCCAIN DIDN’T DO HIS JOB AND YOU TRY AND TELL ME IT’S OKAY BECAUSE MCCAIN ADMITTED IT “WASN’T HIS FINEST HOUR”? YOU REPUBLICANS CRACK ME UP! YOU JUST DON’T GET IT, DO YOU? MCCAIN IS NOT THE “HONORABLE” MAN HE PRETENDS TO BE. HE’S WORSE THAN AN EMPTY SUIT: HE’S A PROVEN CRIMINAL. AND THAT’S THE TRUTH OF HIM. END OF STORY.
Posted by: RANGER RICHARD | June 29, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
HuffPost’s dollar2donut:
“his wife fights five years to get him out of that hell-hole in Vietnam. She gets in a car accident and is disabled…he returns, cheats on her with Cindy, then leaves his wife and marries Cindy one month later so she can finance his poiltical career. Yeah, that’s the kind of man you can trust all right!”
A man who leaves his wife for another woman in time of adversity has no backbone as a man, not to talk of shame and integrity.
This is your straight talk express?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
McCain is from a totally different generation that are so apart from mine. He flip-flopped on a few issues too. But he leaves me no doubt about his love for this country.
Posted by: young_voter | Jun 29, 2008 7:38:38 PM
4444444444444444444444444
McCain said “I never really loved America until I was deprived of its company” the deprivation being when he was a POW. Which means he didn’t love america until he was captured as a POW. Even though he had the best of everything and opportunities reserved for the rich and well connectioned. Sounds like the typical spoiled silver spooned brat to me.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Is this the same John McCain, respected POW whose arms are out of shape from the torture he endured in Vietnam, who fought against Bush & Co’s torture methods, then caved in??
A Democrat again, since “we” invaded Iraq, I actually wrote him about 3 years ago, asking him to run for president. That’s when he was still a maverick with high ideals. Not any more.
He should stay out of the blame game.
Posted by: Colorado Dem | June 29, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
This blog has been attracting wackos and irrational, uneducated people to post in favor of Senator McCain. Not one in ten has the brain of an eigth grader. Very sad, indeed, that these are the people voting for our next President. No wonder America is in trouble.
Posted by: Mal | June 29, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
All those that think McCain’s policy on Iraq is right should shut the hell up and go enlist and die in Iraq instead of sending other people’s children to die there. No…not my me, better to send your familly to die there so that the special interest can be served from this damn war that not even a war. It’s all about oil and the special interest that McCain is aligned with. He is nothing but an opportunist who has lived off TAXPAYER MONEY all his life with special favors because his daddy was an Admiral. WHAT REAL JOB HAS HE EVER HAD??? NONE. He’s a sleeze bucket that preys on the likes of scared and misinformed people like these jackasses here that support him. He’s the pimp and you are his prostitutes. I have no respect for these damn idiots that wear blindfolds or are incredibly stupid and naive believing this old man’s BS.
Posted by: Jake | June 29, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Republicans are terrible people. This blog proves it.
Posted by: emillo | June 29, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
McCain is right you can’t trust Obama. Question who would you rather have protect your children Obama or McCain? No choice is there?
Posted by: a citizen | June 29, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
a citizen – i would rather have Obama protect my children. McCain would probably sell them out and throw them under the bus, like he has everyone he’s ever come in contact with. Look up his history – he’s a real sleaze and is only out for #11
Posted by: Carolyn K. | June 29, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
What’s funny about McCain is that even Republicans don’t really like him. They had the chance to nominate him in 2000 and didn’t and now they’re trying to push their sloppy seconds on us like it was good deal. No way!
Posted by: nimbus | June 29, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Politics aside, just because a person hasn’t done a job and has no resume or track record, doesn’t make them incapable of doing it and doing it well.
A college student just graduated is a good example. No experience – just knowledge but they find and keep good jobs by applying that knowledge and learning and getting better and better. Some bring new ideas to their jobs.
I took a job promotion once based on knowledge and no experience. In two years, I had won the division award. I then proceeded to win a vision award for bringing innovation to my job processes that saved time and money.
Congress makes the laws so the President is a figurehead with ideas. That is what Obama is doing. Throwing ideas out there hopefully to be thrashed around and discussed in the hope that some sort of change for the good of all the people can come out of it.
A resume is just that. Many have been hired on the strength of a resume and turned out to be less than wonderful leaders – this in politics and the business world.
Posted by: Justmenan | June 29, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Annoyingrabbit, you made me read a whole bunch of junk and yet did not read anything incriminating about Obama. just false smears. Try harder.
Posted by: vuzous | June 29, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
The GOP smearbook that attacks and attempts to destroy the personal credibility of dealing with the issues isn’t going to work this time. America bought that lie in 2004 and we have seen the republican economy up close and personal. The dollar is in a free fall, debt is skyrocketing, and our kids are dying in Iraq for no reason other that GOP ego. The Bush administration is the most corrupt in our nations history – championing torture, illegally spying on Americans, betraying CIA agents, pardoning criminals to protect other criminals, “losing” emails that would lead to indictments, illegally firing employees and stacking the Justice department with idiots that have phony degrees, “loosing” BILLIONS of dollars (that is typically called looting), and… well, the criminal list goes on and on and on. And McCain sold his soul and American taxpayers out for 30 more pieces of silver as he gets GOP cash in exchange for contributing to the cover ups.
GOP Barry Goldwater would throw the lot of em in jail and rightfully so.
Posted by: gnomic | June 29, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
You cannot entrust your new politics in an old politician, just as you cannot keep your new wine in an old wineskin. be assured of its integrity?
McCain is full of the usual Washington experience; why do we expect that, now, he would lead in a new direction?
And, is this not the McCain, whose own wife dearest would not let him anywhere near their household economy without a prenup, who now wants to be entrusted with what is about the largest economy in the world?
Posted by: Charitybegins@home | June 29, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Brian Maslow
I can’t believe you would bring up ANYTHING that McCain did while he was in captivity. His main goal was survival and he asked for a great many fellow POW’s to leave far before he left Vietnam. It is completely incredible that you who sit behind a computer desk would totally be so disrespectful to someone who survived several years of torture and degrading behavior. Judge not lest you be judged. I for one see a lot of ignorance showing.
Posted by: mccollegemom | June 29, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Posted by: hopesprings52 | Jun 28, 2008 11:04:57 PM and stated in part “Since Obama has very little record to go on, the integrity of his word is of critical importance”
By those standards then you are saying that since McCain ahs so many years i nthe Senate, that he can flip-flop all he wants (which he is doing), and that’s OK.
That don’t make no sense.
McCain reminds me of the old fogies who used to run companies at the beginning of the IT revolution and who wouldn’t embrace the new computer technology. Those companies ended up going under.
The country needs new and young blood. Someone who understands tha twe are in the 21st century and not in the 19th or 20th as McCain seems to think.
Posted by: Barry | June 29, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
mccollegemom – save it for somebody who cares. There were others in that prison who never broke. McCain is not a hero. There is ample evidence that he did his best to bury MIA evidence in order to buddy up to his former captors. Real Vietnam combat vets like me know that McShame is a snake.
Posted by: Brian Maslow | June 29, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Jake- I think you should stop your BS about McCain unless you can prove it.
Justmenan- I guess we should take a college student and put him in as the CEO of the company. After all he has the board and all his direct reports to make the decision? Did you actually read what you wrote?
Yes Obama is like a college student looking for a job. 144 says of Senate experience and nothing else. Wow- impressive.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
“I am a black criminal and I have performed the deeds of an air pirate. I almost died and the Vietnamese people saved my life, thanks to the doctors.” – John McCain 1968
Posted by: brian Maslow | June 29, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
As for McCain’s flip-flops, he has changed position on oil drilling and Bush’s tax cuts for TAXPAYERS because of the current economic situations. McCain is right that we need to severely lessen our dependance on foreign oil while developing other technologies to keep us progressive and independent from foreign energy markets.
As to the tax cuts, McCain is aware that asking these taxpayers from all brackets to pay past level of taxes would hurt this country’s economy worse than it is hurting right now.
They are legitimate changes of position. The examples of Obama changing views on the 2nd ammendment, NAFTA, and immigration reform are true examples of flip-flops. He says different things to different groups he talks with. This is a typical politician move. If you have no record or not true opinion, then you can’t be labled anyway, hence all the present votes in Chicago.
McCain has his problems with me but he is far better and far more trustworthy than Obama
I thought Obama might have been the one to unite the country but then I have watched how he campaigns with Hillary and now McCain. He cries race with every criticism and yet levels unfair attacks with anyone who doesn’t agree with him.
Change for the worse is not something this country needs.
Posted by: mccollegemom | June 29, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
mccollegemom – why not? mcsame brings it up constantly, so it seems like it’s fair game to me.
Posted by: lascar | June 29, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Brian Maslow- You may remember that McCain was one of the highest ranked prisoners and was tortured. I’m sure there were others who didn;t break but, were they tortured to the extent McCain was? Did they give up early release because no one else was being released? I think you better check the real record.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
mccollegemom – you left out mccain’s flip flop on torture and waterboarding. i find it disgusting that a man who was once tortured himself would sell out on that principle just to raise more money from the same republican donors who funded Bush’s two campaigns. Also did you know that McCain cheated on his first wife while she had cancer? The man has no integrity. He is only out for himself.
Posted by: nimbus | June 29, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
And which Republican nominee said this — McMaverick or McBush? Seems that if anyone cannot be trusted to keep their word, it’s John McSame, who tells one story on immigration reform to Latinos, while selling them out to his Neocon Cronies.
That’s just one example. There are soooo many more!
If John McBush wants to make this a war on who can be trusted, Bring It On!!!!
Obama 2008 — Yes, WE CAN!!!
Posted by: jackt51 | June 29, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
There were also many POW’s who were not fortunate to make it out alive. Noone knows what they would do in that situation unless you were the one in it. As for others in the military, he has many more supporters than detractors and certainly has more service credentials than his opponent. His foreign policy is light years ahead of Obama’s. In this global era, we need a leader who is proven.
Posted by: mccollegemom | June 29, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Then the character he is…is to lie. Please enough of his experience in Viet Nam. There are plenty of POWs and Viet Nam vets with even more severe injuries than McCain. It didn’t give them a free pass in life, nor should it give one to McCain. But then again, he does has a free pass…his 100% disability pension while others got much less with far more injuries. And the nerve of it all is that he can “work” as a Senator and get a 100% disability pension. I always thought the definition of a person being disabled is that he cannot work. Did that meaning get twisted? But what’s worse is that he has no shame taking that pension and still working. Some integrity and character.
Posted by: Jake | June 29, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
I have been a staunch Obama supporter since Edwards suspended his primary campaign.
Once Obama got the nomination, he completely dissed his base, showing us that indeed he can NOT be trusted. Case in point: his support of the horrendous FISA bill, which shreds the 4th Amendment.
So much for standing on principle.
NO more money from me… from now on, I’ll donate to the ACLU.
Posted by: pointus | June 29, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
collegemom – you’ve got to be joking. “In this global era” we don’t need a cold war fossil who doesn’t even know how to use a computer. Get real. Besides the only foreign policy experience McCain has is dropping bombs on people. Hell, even the Republicans don’t like this guy – he’s their sloppy seconds after Bush. Face it, the GOP knows it’s going to lose in November and they’ve put McSame up as their sacrificial lamb. Poor old bastard won’t know what hit him.
Posted by: mingering mike | June 29, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
It is interesting that there are other points of view on what happened to McCain after he helped the enemy for years and on the USS Forrestal.
It appears he ‘wet-started’ his jet sending a flame behind him that triggered the Zuni rocket on the plane behind him to be fired that caused the fire. And then he left and was immediately transferred from the ship that day.
And why did he block release of his MIA/POW records along with all the other vets who wanted theirs after it was approved to release them 410-0 by Congress? Too bad there are no investigative reporters anywhere in the MSM to find out.
http://www.usvetdsp.com/smith_mc.htm
http://judicial-inc.biz/82jjohn_mccain_and_the_uss_forresta.htm
McCain admits that three to four days after he was captured, he promised the Vietnamese, “I’ll give you military information if you will take me to the hospital.”
McCain also admits that the Vietnamese rushed him to a hospital, but denies he was given “special medical treatment” because of his promise.
He claims he was given medical care normally unavailable to captured Americans only because the Vietnamese learned he was the son of Admiral John S. McCain, Jr., the soon-to-be commander of all U.S. forces in the Pacific including those fighting in Vietnam.
The Vietnamese figured that because POW McCain’s father was of such high military rank that he was of royalty or the governing circle in the United States. Thereafter the communist bragged that they had captured “the crown prince”and treated him as a “special prisoner.”
Less than two weeks after McCain was taken to a hospital, Hanoi’s press began quoting him giving specific military information, including the name of the aircraft carrier on which he was based, numbers of U.S. pilots that had been lost, the number of aircraft in his flight, information about location of rescue ships and the order of which his attack was supposed to take place.
There is also evidence that McCain received “special” medical treatment from a Soviet physician.
After he was out of the hospital, McCain continued cooperating with the North Vietnamese for a period of three years. He made radio broadcasts for the communists and met with foreign delegations, including the Cubans. He was interviewed by at least two North Vietnamese generals one of whom was Vietnam’s national hero, General Vo Nguyen Giap.
On June 4, 1969, a U.S. wire service story headlined “PW Songbird Is Pilot Son of Admiral,” reported one of McCain’s radio broadcasts: “Hanoi has aired a broadcast in which the pilot son of the United States commander in the Pacific, Adm. John McCain, purportedly admits to having bombed civilian targets in North Vietnam and praises medical treatment he has received since being taken prisoner.
“The broadcast was beamed to American servicemen in South Vietnam as a part of a propaganda series attempting to counter charges by U.S. Defense Secretary Melvin Laird that American prisoners are being mistreated in North Vietnam.”
McCain says he violated the Code of Conduct only when the North Vietnamese brutally tortured him. He further claims that he was so distraught afterwards that he tried to commit suicide. He has never explained why his “aid to the enemy” continued for more than three years.
Even though there are no reports in the public record from other POWs who witnessed McCain’s claims of torture and heroics or his attempted suicide, the American media has accepted his version of events word for word, no questions asked.
Yet, the same press that transformed the admiral’s son into an “incredible war hero–an inspiration to all Americans,” vilified the two grunts.
Comparing the incidents surrounding the fates of three POWs,’ who collaborated with the enemy, makes one question why two faced possible execution for treason, while the third won acclaim as a hero fit to be President of the United States.
Once more, Lady Luck had smiled on John McCain . . . or was it the admiral?
Posted by: Roxi | June 29, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
When I was in college, I was a Democrat. A couple of years after college, I registered to vote as a Republican. Today, I’m an independent. Young men, when you get older you become wiser. Your uncle is different, it’s not because he is old if you know what I means.
Posted by: crookedpolitician | June 29, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
As I said I do have some issues with McCain. But for those who keep bringing up his first wife, it seems like over 50% of married people end up in divorce so that argument does not hold much water with me. I have been married for 23 years and would like to see a long term committment from a president, but that is not one of the core issues for me.
As for waterboarding and torture, I hate the sound of it. But the attack on the Twin Towers by criminals who were willing to take their own lives was much more abhorrent. I don’t think these individuals would give other pertinent information with an invitation to tea. As I said, I am not for this kind of torture but I am less for THOUSANDS of innocent civilians being killed.
Posted by: mccollegemom | June 29, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Old man McBush is clearly grasping at straws. He cannot shake off Bush and that is only one of his worries in the upcoming election. When you don’t have a message, all you can do is attack your opponent. Touche.
Posted by: Holly | June 29, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
neither candidate can be trusted–experience will be the winning factor in the end!
Posted by: william pappas | June 29, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Right now McCain is a flip flopper. After November 4 he will just be a flop. Being number two in an election is still much better than being ranked 884 in a class of 889. I find it rather interesting that he’s only 9 or 10 points ahead on Obama in Arizona in the most recent polls.
Posted by: bhciapol | June 29, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
As I said I do have some issues with McCain. But for those who keep bringing up his first wife, it seems like over 50% of married people end up in divorce so that argument does not hold much water with me. I have been married for 23 years and would like to see a long term committment from a president, but that is not one of the core issues for me.
Posted by: mccollegemom | Jun 29, 2008 9:15:04 PM
Do most people leave their spouse after they waited faithfully while they were a POW? Only to see the POW cheat on and leave his wife while she was disabled? Newt Gingrich did something quite similar to his wife. And this is a man of high moral to be trusted and worshiped?
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Jschmidt,
What exactly is the point you are making. Is it your contention that you can prove all of the negative stuff you have posted but that the negative stuff about McCain is unproven. Let me take a case in point, You accuse Senator Dodd of doing something wrong with respect to his mortgage. Now Dodd said that he was unaware that he was getting a particularly good deal. You seem to find this to be a horrendous act. Note that to date no one has accused Dodd of any quid pro quo type activity. Moreover Country Wide the lender in question has not been bailed out or anything like that by congress.
Now what even baffles me more is your attempt to somehow make a case that the Democrats are corrupt and you provide a list. Do you not feel obligated to compare that list against the Republican list. This whole exercise is silly. It is kind of like being a little bit pregnant.
So here now is the dispassionate truth. We gave the Republicans a chance to show what they could do. How well they could govern. We gave them control of both houses of congress from the middle of Bill Clinton’s first term right up through the lst two years of George Bush’s last two years of his second term. That amounts to some 13 or so years and what do we have to show for it. As things stand today they have failed, that is simple. I was a part of giving them that time. They have been proven to be corrupt and rotten to the core.
The bottom line is that IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE. This time around I am voting straight Democrat, I will vote for a dog if it is on the Democrat line. JSCHMIDT you and all other Republicans have betrayed the trust I placed in you. It is that simple.
Posted by: Betrayed | June 29, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Obama Democrats are terrible people.
Posted by: Mal | June 29, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
neither candidate can be trusted–experience will be the winning factor in the end!
Posted by: william pappas | Jun 29, 2008 9:23:06 PM
4444444444444444444444444
People want the experience of change and they don’t want to continue to experience bush thru mccain.
Obama 08
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
I voted for Hill in the primary. when she dropped out I looked at McCains Politics, his history and his integrity in the Senate. Then I looked at Obama. The choice is pretty clear. McCain is a Hero he would not leave his fellow POWs behind when he had the chance. He won’t leave us behind either. He has been considered a Maverick Moderate Republican. Often teaming up with Democrats to create great legislation. Obama, On the other hand want to tax us to death. The Senate bill he has coming up is a Global wealth re-distribution. $850B (as in Billion)of your TAX dollars will be sent to other countries that have a high poverty level. Sounds good? Not when I am struggling paycheck to paycheck and not when we have not solved our own poverty problems in this country. Not to mention Gas prices. His priorities are not in our best interest as a country. Plus he has very little experience. It would ne like promoting a Lieutenant to Army Chief of Staff overnight. It would be a disaster.
Go MCain!!!
Posted by: McDaddy | June 29, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Merri- what ‘change’? I heard a lot of that and what is the ‘change’? Obama is just another tax and spend liberal but one with no experience. He has bad associates, and flips on every stand. He’s taken money when he says he hasn;t. I see no ‘change’!!!
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
McDaddy, YOU ARE A FRAUD. Yes another REPUBLICAN fraud. I know you people so well. You see I used to be a Rpublican fraud to. I know the operation.
Everything you say about McCain would have been true if Hillary had won the Democrat primary. And in the primary’s Clinton and Obama were relatively close in tax policy etc so how could you have been supporting her.
I say it again, you are a fraud, a REPUBLICAN dirty trickster. I know. I am a reformed Republican dirty trickster.
Posted by: Betrayed | June 29, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
I read roxy’s post already. Not much can be confirmed there. However at least he has a history. Obama has none. All I know is McCain has done lot’s of good for this country. Obama. Not so much. Can you at least admit that a flip flop is the same as changing your mind about a topic? I do know that I change my mind on many things in my life when I A. either learned a lesson or B. Were presented with a compelling argument that made me look twice at my position. It’s called being intellegent and know who you are as a person.
Posted by: McDaddy | June 29, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Excuse me Mr. McCaine. Shall we ask your first wife, if your vows can be trusted?
Those who live in glass houses, should not cast stones.
Posted by: sgp | June 29, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
General Wesley Clark:
“Well, I don’t think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president.”
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | June 29, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Merri- what ‘change’? I heard a lot of that and what is the ‘change’? Obama is just another tax and spend liberal but one with no experience. He has bad associates, and flips on every stand. He’s taken money when he says he hasn;t. I see no ‘change’!!!
Posted by: jschmidt | Jun 29, 2008 9:41:29 PM
4444444444444444444444444444
Do you honestly think Obama will keep doing things like bush and mccain would? He has shown that he learns from past mistakes unlike bush or mccain. That’s change enough for me.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/28/opinion/main4216810.shtml
http://www.barackobama.com/index.php
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Betrayed- Republicans had control of congress for maybe 6 years and never the 60 votes on the senate. Do the Dems did what the Republicans have done to prevent runaway legislation by the leading party. The Democratic bloggers here are hypocrites when they talk only about Republcian corruption, I noted many Democrats and admit both sides have had corrupt politicians. You had change when Bush came in. Did you like it? No because he governed from the extreme right wing. Obama will govern from the far left wing and if the Dems get 60 votes in the Senate, the nation will be far worse for it. McCain has proven and will govern from the center which is what this country needs. We do not need another extreme in charge. I submit Obama supporters are blind to Obama’s faults and he has plenty. McCain’s record of faults is open for discussion. His accomplishments are numerous. But Obama supporters at least in this blog are nasty and hateful. They actually sound like the worst of the Republicans back in 04. Take that compliment.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
bedy: I am with you.
Posted by: Sally | June 29, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
JSchmidt, that Tax and spend thing is old hat. You Republicans really need to “run something new”. You have, according to you, not taxed and spent, you have had total control of monetary policy, and taxation for 7 years and partial control for 6 yet we are in bigger trouble than ever in my life time(61 I am now).
Now you want us to put an old coot in powere who says that he knows nothing about economic policy.
The Republican party is too corrupt and John McCain is too old. The two of them together in power is a recipe for disaster.
Posted by: Betrayed | June 29, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
If you betray the trust of your wife ….. hmmmm … and who’s trust is in question here.
laughable.
Posted by: Omentum | June 29, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Let’s face it, pickins are slim this year for President, I cannot believe as big as this country is, this is the 2 we have to choose from…….
Posted by: daysofpast | June 29, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
daysofpast,
I agree, this time there is no lesser of two evils.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
SERIOUSLY PEOPLE!
The world is going to end in 2012 anyways and both candidates suck horribly, so why are we wasting so much time over this? It’s not worth it. Actually none of these posts are worth it [including this one].
Just do what you personally can to make the world a better place. Quit relying on shady politics to do it for you!
Posted by: SCREWPOLITICS | June 29, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Joc.
You seem to be a pretty learned individual. Well read voter and all of that. To answer your question, Yes we do need a President. Sad. every so often the pickins are so slim. So, who do you think will win this election?
Posted by: Mike | June 29, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Betrayed- thanks for proving that Obama supporters are nasty and hateful as I said.
http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/mccain/articles/2007/03/01/20070301mccainbio-chapter5.html
About McCains wife Carol:
Carol, his wife, had been in a disfiguring traffic accident in 1969, a development that McCain first heard about from an officer’s offhand remark.
Like her husband, Carol was enduring a painful episode. On an icy Christmas Eve, she lost control of her car and crashed into a telephone pole. Authorities found her thrown from the wreckage, in shock and with serious injuries. Her legs were crunched, her arm and pelvis smashed and internal organs were bleeding. She almost died, and doctors discussed amputating her legs. It took months of operations, physical therapy and convalescence before Carol could walk without crutches.
“You might be upset when you see me,” Carol warned him from Jacksonville in their first post-release telephone conversation.
McCain reassured her: “Well, you know, I don’t look so good myself. It’s fine.”
According to McCain’s account of Carol’s recovery in Faith of My Fathers, she lost 4 inches off her height as a result of the accident and the related medical procedures.
In the book, McCain praised Carol’s “determined spirit” and refusal to succumb to “despair and self-pity.”
McCain was eager to get home to Carol and the children. His daughter Sidney was just a baby when McCain departed for Vietnam. She didn’t remember him.
“To her I had become an object of curiosity, a man in a photograph whom her mother and brothers talked about a lot,” McCain wrote.
He had no idea what Sidney or her older brothers now looked like. He had gotten little word on their growth while in the prison camp.
By St. Patrick’s Day 1973 he was back in Florida.
“If there was one couple that deserved to make it, it was John and Carol McCain,” author Robert Timberg wrote in John McCain: An American Odyssey. “They endured nearly six years of unspeakable trauma with courage and grace. In the end it was not enough. They won the war but lost the peace.”
In February 1980, less than a year after he met Cindy, McCain petitioned a Florida court to dissolve his marriage to Carol, calling the union “irretrievably broken.”
In his book Worth the Fighting For, McCain offers his own post-mortem on his failed marriage. He “had not shown the same determination to rebuild (his) personal life” as he had to excel in his naval career.
“Sound marriages can be hard to recover after great time and distance have separated a husband and wife. We are different people when we reunite,” McCain wrote. “But my marriage’s collapse was attributable to my own selfishness and immaturity more than it was to Vietnam, and I cannot escape blame by pointing a finger at the war. The blame was entirely mine.”
Carol, who remains on good terms with her former husband, generally has avoided reporters interested in hearing her side of the story.
She did briefly address her divorce to Timberg: “The breakup of our marriage was not caused by my accident or Vietnam or any of those things. I don’t know that it might not have happened if John had never been gone. I attribute it more to John turning 40 and wanting to be 25 again than I do to anything else.”
In the divorce settlement, McCain was generous with Carol, the mother of their daughter Sidney and two sons, whom McCain had adopted. Among other things, McCain gave Carol the rights to houses in Florida and Virginia and agreed to provide insurance or pay for additional treatment she was expected to require.
Except for signing the property settlement, Carol did not participate in the divorce. A court summons and other paperwork sent to her during the proceeding went unanswered.
In April 1980, the judge entered a default judgment and declared the marriage dissolved.
Carol went her separate way, finding work as a personal aide to Nancy Reagan during the 1980 presidential primary campaign and later running the White House Visitors Office.
He had not met his current wife until 1979.
If Obama supporters would like to take about McCains first wife- at least get your facts straight. McCain has discussed this openly- nothing to hide.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
No Jschmidt, the Obama supporters are not any mor mean than the McCain supporters, both sides have some overtop people. That is another of the myths of the Republican party that somehow Republicans are better than others.
You are also wron about the control of the government. Republicans controlled bothe houses of congress for most of Bill clintons term and had control of the hous of representatives for 13 years.
I would also like to say that I agree with those who say that the McCain of today is in no way the same man who ran against George Bush. I would like to see you or anyone else dispute that.
The McCain of today has repudiated all he stood for in 1999. He is a much bigger flip flopper than John Kerry.
Posted by: Betrayed | June 29, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Vanessa…Obama is the biggest flip-flopper of all! But, there are many other issues that bother me a lot more about Obama.
http://www.theobamafile.com/
Posted by: carolyn | June 29, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Betrayed- Republicans had control of congress for maybe 6 years and never the 60 votes on the senate. Do the Dems did what the Republicans have done to prevent runaway legislation by the leading party. The Democratic bloggers here are hypocrites when they talk only about Republcian corruption, I noted many Democrats and admit both sides have had corrupt politicians. You had change when Bush came in. Did you like it? No because he governed from the extreme right wing. Obama will govern from the far left wing and if the Dems get 60 votes in the Senate, the nation will be far worse for it. McCain has proven and will govern from the center which is what this country needs. We do not need another extreme in charge. I submit Obama supporters are blind to Obama’s faults and he has plenty. McCain’s record of faults is open for discussion. His accomplishments are numerous. But Obama supporters at least in this blog are nasty and hateful. They actually sound like the worst of the Republicans back in 04. Take that compliment.
Posted by: jschmidt | Jun 29, 2008 9:51:54 PM
4444444444444444444444
Why is it that republican presidents are more likely to break laws and screw over the constituition? Richard Nixon and Watergate, Ronald Reagan and Iran Contra, George H.W. Bush and the illegal war in Nicaragua, George W. Bush and the Iraq war, torture, illegal wiretapping, these more but you get the idea. So vote republican if you want a crook in the white house.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
SCREWPOLITICS,
With one of these 2 yahoo’s in office it will be sooner than that!
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Betrayed:
Well spoken. The chant that these McCain supporters are repeating is getting old. But then, thats all they got.
Obama talks about what he will do to make America better. McCain offers gimmicks. Obama says how we can accomplish these goals. McCain offers very little in plans to pay for anything, and when pressed says he will cut it from pork.
Wait a minute! The Republican Administration has $300 million in pork now? Waiting for McCain to just ‘cut’? Well, why wait? Cut it now! So much for straight talk.
Obama in ’08. Yes we can!
Posted by: Kevin | June 29, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Carolyn K…Obama is the one that throws everybody under the bus. You are a paid Obama blogger trying to turn Obama’s BS to McCain like they did with Hillary. It won’t work. I hate Obama. I know way too much about him.
Posted by: carolyn | June 29, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Rodney:
Since when is divorce ‘namby pamby stuff’? The sanctity of marriage is a Christian value. Or have you forgotten that promise “What God has joined together let no man tear apart”?
Posted by: Kevin | June 29, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
.
How low will McSame go?
Watch the rovian slime flow!
.
Posted by: wordvarc | June 29, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Betrayed…You’ll be getting your wish. You’ll wish a dog was in the White House. A dog wouldn’t do the damage that Obama will do. Don’t you get it? A Change doesn’t always mean for the better. A new President, regardless who it is, will be a chnage from Bush. That doesn’t mean you have to run out and vote for a racist.
http://www.theobamafile.com/
Posted by: carolyn | June 29, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
carolyn:
Checked out the website you posted. Its a Republican Right Wing smear website pandering half truths and false accusations to defeat Obama. Amazing you would even want to be associated with such a source.
Since you know the candidates so well, who is Charles Keating?
Posted by: Kevin | June 29, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Betrayed…You’ll be getting your wish. You’ll wish a dog was in the White House. A dog wouldn’t do the damage that Obama will do. Don’t you get it? A Change doesn’t always mean for the better. A new President, regardless who it is, will be a chnage from Bush. That doesn’t mean you have to run out and vote for a racist.
Posted by: carolyn | Jun 29, 2008 10:35:05 PM
444444444444444444444444444
You can try fear and smear and slime all you want but. Anyone that prefers to stay the course with mccain after seeing 8 years of republican destruction
has absolutely zero credibility.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
The issue over campaign contributions isn’t about money, its about the American people who are so desperate for change that they will open their wallets and finance a candidate who is sworn to bring about that change — what McCain fears is that the amount of contributions reflects the disgust with more Republican politics and Republican politicians. This campaign has many different fronts that prevent a black or white (no pun intended) approach to finance. The Swift Boat Liars for Truth boys are even now retooling for their mischief. The Southern Baptist Convention is even now mobilizing their 18 million membership, taking control of their minds so that hard working men and women will vote against their best economic interest and continue the spiral downward that the Republicans are impotent to stop. Obama has to have the funds to deal with these strange perversion of our electorial process. This is probably the last change we will have to save this country. I am voting for Obama.
Posted by: Chris | June 29, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Of course Obama is a liar; anyone who’s been paying any attention knows that by now. How many times did he change the amount of money he got from Rezko? How many different versions did he have to explain his association with that nasty racist church? He also lied about what his representatives told Canada about NAFTA. The man says whatever he thinks he needs to say at the moment to get what he wants. He changes his story when he’s confronted with the previous “truth.” I am certain that he has an undiagnosed and/or untreated personality disorder, possibly narcissistic disorder. The symptoms fit him perfectly. He’s frightening and I’m ashamed of Clinton for allying herself with him. Having her as his vp will not make him any fitter to be president and I will not vote for him, ever.
PUMA! JUST SAY NO DEAL! CLINTONS4MCCAIN!
Posted by: Griffin | June 29, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
omentum…Why would anybody care what McCain and his ex-wife’s relationship was or what his current might be now? I
want a safe country to live in. I don’t want to pay high taxes. I love Amrica and I want a President and a frst lady that loves her too. That would not be Obama and Michelle. It’s that simple.
Posted by: carolyn | June 29, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Of course Obama is a liar; anyone who’s been paying any attention knows that by now. How many times did he change the amount of money he got from Rezko? How many different versions did he have to explain his association with that nasty racist church? He also lied about what his representatives told Canada about NAFTA. The man says whatever he thinks he needs to say at the moment to get what he wants. He changes his story when he’s confronted with the previous “truth.” I am certain that he has an undiagnosed and/or untreated personality disorder, possibly narcissistic disorder. The symptoms fit him perfectly. He’s frightening and I’m ashamed of Clinton for allying herself with him. Having her as his vp will not make him any fitter to be president and I will not vote for him, ever.
PUMA! JUST SAY NO DEAL! CLINTONS4MCCAIN!
Posted by: Griffin | June 29, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
My Dear Dear Friends, McCain has repeatedly called for a respectful debate about substance and issues. So he attacks Senator Obama with these kinds of remarks. Now who is the one whose “words can not be trusted” ?
No one is tricked by McCains thinly veiled anger hiding behind his labored and hushed talking, or his badly delivered hateful punchlines. He sounds like he is reading the end to a fairy tale to children as they fall asleep, but guess what, this time no one is sleeping! And guess what else, everyone knows that what he is saying is a Fariy Tale
Posted by: Dennis de Bourbon | June 29, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Carolyn,
C’mon you know Ms Michelle is the perfect lady who is proud of her country. (snicker, snicker)
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
omentum…Why would anybody care what McCain and his ex-wife’s relationship was or what his current might be now? I
want a safe country to live in. I don’t want to pay high taxes. I love Amrica and I want a President and a frst lady that loves her too. That would not be Obama and Michelle. It’s that simple.
Posted by: carolyn | Jun 29, 2008 10:47:27 PM
444444444444444444444444
Do you care that mccain called his wife cindy a C**T?
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
greg posts:
I hope that americans who are unsure or have formed a negative opinion of Senator Obama will read his book “Audacity of Hope” they will find that Senator Obama is a compassionate and brillant man, who cares deeply about the people of america. If they examine his positions and policy for themselves, I belieive that they will conclude he is the best choice for america and can be trusted to keep his promises to the american people.
—————————————
I have read the book. Trust this man? You can’t be serious!
“I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds change in an ugly direction”. BARACK OBAMA from “The Audacity Of Hope”
Posted by: Bea | June 29, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
To annoyingrabbit, you are just blabbing, anyone who has examined Senator Obama’s website and read in depth his plan for the entire array of ideas he has including education etc. would be blown aaway at how specific he is. Do yourself a favor rabbit and compare his to McCains and then come back here and change your post!
Posted by: Dennis de Bourbon | June 29, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Carolyn,
C’mon you know Ms Michelle is the perfect lady who is proud of her country. (snicker, snicker)
Posted by: J | Jun 29, 2008 10:54:28 PM
444444444444444444444444
McCain said “I never really loved America until I was deprived of its company” the deprivation being when he was a POW. Which means he didn’t love america until he was captured as a POW. Even though he had the best of everything and opportunities reserved for the rich and well connectioned. Sounds like the typical spoiled silver spooned brat to me.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Oh so I am mean and hateful because I state that John is too old to be running for the presidency.
What is hateful about that. It is my opinion. I am a an older American male also and I am also too old to be running for the presidency. I sure as hell do not hate myself.
You people just seem to feel that you are entitled to everything. Did you see all of the realy mean and nasty stuff posted here about Obama. You accused him of taking money from people and then doing favors for them. One of you here associated him with some Monkey God, and we all know the racial connotations of that. You Republicans are selling a sock puppet with the form of a monkey and calling it Obama.
Go back and read some of what has been said about Obama and then come back and tell me about hateful.
I do not hate John McCain. In fact there was a time when I was perhaps his biggest fan but he has changed his positions, and that is a fact. Is it hateful for me to say that. I also happen to think that no one over the age of 65 should be running for the presidency. That is true regardless of party affiliation.
Imagine someone who supports the GOP and Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh, Hannity, and all the others, calling anyone hateful. The party that used race baiting to defeat Harold Ford. Remember that.
Posted by: Betrayed | June 29, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
carolyn:
If McCain won’t keep his promise “to have and to hold ’til death do us part”, what makes you think he will keep his promise to you?
And, have you ever observed Obama’s passion for this country? Clearly he knows a love for America that is unquestionable. That’s not to say McCain doesn’t also, but Obama loves America every bit as much.
High taxes come from excessive spending. Like 10 billion dollars a month for an Unnecessary War. A war that should never have been launched. Who is going to pay for that?
Posted by: Kevin | June 29, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
oh please, is this all mccain can come up with?… first of all he’s jealous that obama has gotten millions of dollars of support from regular folks, while mccain continues to kiss butt with every oil corporate criminal lobbyist for money… and as far as debates and town hall meetings, obama will define his schedule, not mccain
Posted by: earthisnotflat | June 29, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Fact is Obama’s word cannot now be trusted on anything. He’ll do whatever he wants. He can just as easily reverse his position on Reverend Wright. He’s a man without integrity not deserving of the Presidency. I’m not saying this because I like McCain.
========================================
Obama, the architect of BitterGate!!!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | June 29, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Bea – That quote is false. That is NOT what he said. In fact, the real quote was one of the most poignant passages in the book. If I ever see you post that quote again, I will be justified in calling you a liar.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
carolyn:
If McCain won’t keep his promise “to have and to hold ’til death do us part”, what makes you think he will keep his promise to you?
And, have you ever observed Obama’s passion for this country? Clearly he knows a love for America that is unquestionable. That’s not to say McCain doesn’t also, but Obama loves America every bit as much.
High taxes come from excessive spending. Like 10 billion dollars a month for an Unnecessary War. A war that should never have been launched. Who is going to pay for that?
Posted by: Kevin | Jun 29, 2008 11:03:46 PM
44444444444444444444444444
I think the difference is Obama loves america, its people and wants to better the lives of average americans most. Mccain loves american for what he can use it to benefit from it and to help big business and lobbyist.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
Merri – Where is that McCain quote from? That’s a great one because it is the eaxct form of the one they keep bringing up on Michelle. If we interpret hers as anti-American, we would have to do the same with his.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Merri,
Did you ever stop to think that what he meant was that he took it for granted until he didn’t have it like most of us do? I bet you wouldn’t have survived what he did.
It’s easy to put the man down if you have never been in his shoes. Also I am not a McCain or Obama supporter.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Dennis….Obama is a compulsive liar. How many times does he have to lie to you for you to catch on? His website is meaningless—his history is what an intelligent person would choose to gage him. He is a corrupt politician, yeah he wants to grow the government but it will cost the taxpayers especially the middle class massive amounts in taxes so his friends can scam like Rezko money from taxpayers. This is who and what Obama is. BTW, before you try to delude yourself and others, Obama has already said “special” groups and people you know like the ones donating money to him will be exempted from the tax increases—the rest of us campers will be paying out the nose. Obama means higher taxes plain and simple.
Posted by: annoyingrabbit | Jun 29, 2008 11:08:54 PM
Fact is Obama’s word cannot now be trusted on anything. He’ll do whatever he wants. He can just as easily reverse his position on Reverend Wright. He’s a man without integrity not deserving of the Presidency. I’m not saying this because I like McCain.
========================================
Obama, the architect of BitterGate!!!
========================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | Jun 29, 2008 11:11:24 PM
444444444444444444444444
You two are gonna have bitter prune faces when Obama becomes POTUS. Get ready it’s gonna happen. Ha ha he he
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
annoyingrabbit -
I guess we’ll all find out together, won’t we? ;-)
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
There’s absolutely nothing about BHO that looks or sounds presidential.What’s going on here?
Posted by: sunny | June 29, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
rodney, you sound like the gatekeeper.
Posted by: georgia | June 29, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Merri – Where is that McCain quote from? That’s a great one because it is the eaxct form of the one they keep bringing up on Michelle. If we interpret hers as anti-American, we would have to do the same with his.
Posted by: jock59801 | Jun 29, 2008 11:15:51 PM
4444444444444444444444444
This was played on Verdict with Dam Abrahms 6/26/08 Thursday on msnbc. He showed Mccain saying that on two different occasions. Maybe it’s on their transcript?
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
annoying,
Just ignore Rodney, he’s a 5th grader using Mommy’s computer.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
rodney, what post were you replying to? What happened to it?
Posted by: georgia | June 29, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
In the person of Obama, here is an individual of great integrity and wisdom, whom this great country desperately needs at this time, and of all the candidates, he remains the only one who can and will bring real change in every respect. Let us elect him to be our next leader.
Posted by: rev.Norbert Larcher | June 29, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
That’s Dan Abrams, not Dam Abrahms. Tho I’m sure mccain supporters are saying DAM Abrams. Ha ha he he
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Merri,
Every person in this country takes for granted what we have and when it’s taken away, it makes us love her even more. That is what McCain meant.
Posted by: J | June 29, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Betrayed- you said” You accused him of taking money from people and then doing favors for them. ”
Check out the ABC article:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/Story?id=4344115&page=2
I don’t make this up like Obama supporters do!
What was hateful was your quote below:
Now you want us to put an old coot in powere who says that he knows nothing about economic policy.
The old coot you are referring to endured significant danger and torture for his country. He has experience and character which is more than Obama has.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 29, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Rodney, such class form the obamanitions again? NOT!!!Personal insults and no substance…….it just proves that once again those that don’t like Obama are right and you know it way down deep inside. Obama is a lying crook that will raise everyone’s taxes massively.
Posted by: annoyingrabbit | Jun 29, 2008 11:19:48 PM
4444444444444444444444444
You want voters to fear Obama on taxes but ignore the republicans reckless spending and tax giveaways to the wealthy? What a unfunny joke.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
J
We know that is what he meant. That is the whole point. You can take a line like that from someone out of context (and he has used that exact line at least 3 times over the years).
It is not fair when people do it to McCain, and it is not fair when people do it to Michelle.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 29, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Merri,
Every person in this country takes for granted what we have and when it’s taken away, it makes us love her even more. That is what McCain meant.
Posted by: J | Jun 29, 2008 11:35:00 PM
44444444444444444444444
You quite understanding of Mccain do you feel the same about Michelle Obama?
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Eldwood
the only thing you left out is the the chant
WHITE POWER
Posted by: Omentum | June 29, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
JOHN MCCAIN
was a war hero 40 years ago.
He has been a complete loser thereafter
first by not voting for the MLK birthday
it was all downhill from there.
Posted by: Omentum | June 29, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
OK I admit I was flame baiting with that one :) You guys are so funny.
Posted by: Elwood | June 29, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Elwood I sure you feel right at home with rats in your trailer and aligning yourself with the rats that currently occupy the white house.
Posted by: Merri | June 29, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
had an affair and threw his first wife under the bus. then he disgraced his present wife. The keating scandal… which dashed the pension of thousands of families….
ok thats enough
OBAMA 08
Posted by: Omentum | June 29, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
McCain opposed MLK day at the time on the sole basis that another federal holiday would limit government services even more. He supported recognition, but just didn’t want government employees to take yet another day off. More recently, he abjectly apologized for failing to see the importance of MLK’s work and that a celebration of Mr. King merited shutting down the government for another day every year.
McCain makes mistakes and admits them. He mans up and attempts to change for the better. The only time I have even come CLOSE to hearing Obama do the same was when he admitted that getting into suspicious land deals with Tony Rezko was a “boneheaded” move. Obama has not admitted it was a mistake to stay in his racist church for 20 years and then drop them like a hot potato when it might affect his poll ratings; he has not admitted it was a mistake not to work across the aisle; etc.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Posted by: Cass | June 30, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
I have an idea. Let’s all have a contest for how many lies and personal attacks we can get people to believe about our opponent, and this will be the way we choose the next President of the United States of America.
God Bless America!
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
McCain opposed MLK day at the time on the sole basis that another federal holiday would limit government services even more. He supported recognition, but just didn’t want government employees to take yet another day off. More recently, he abjectly apologized for failing to see the importance of MLK’s work and that a celebration of Mr. King merited shutting down the government for another day every year.
McCain makes mistakes and admits them. He mans up and attempts to change for the better. The only time I have even come CLOSE to hearing Obama do the same was when he admitted that getting into suspicious land deals with Tony Rezko was a “boneheaded” move. Obama has not admitted it was a mistake to stay in his racist church for 20 years and then drop them like a hot potato when it might affect his poll ratings; he has not admitted it was a mistake not to work across the aisle; etc.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Posted by: Cass | Jun 30, 2008 12:01:25 AM
4444444444444444444444444
Do you fly your confederate flag on your pick up truck or porch?
Posted by: Merri | June 30, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Obama can’t be trusted.
obama lies on family and friends and what he has done and not done, are vast and he keeps them coming.
You can’t trust a liar.
Obama changes his mind about what he believes in every couple days.
Obama Does not make a stand on anything,
Obamas history of voting is not to get involved or make a stand. So he votes present when he shows up. or just does not vote at all.
If obamas can lie to you, he does not care about you.
If obama changes his mind over things he says are important, then he has a problem with Judgment.
obamas friends show he likes to hang with the wild crowd the non conformers, the ones that defy authority. The kind of people you would not associated with or want your kids to associate with, or live in your neighborhood. Terrorist, criminals and radical haters. People he chose to be his best friends for over 20 years.
obama is not trustworthy, Dependable or reliable and something not to believe in, Change brought about by him would not be good change.
Do we want the youth of America to look up to and want to be like Obama?
Take drugs for fun, hang with radical people, smoke, lie and misrepresent themselves, use people because he wants to be popular.
No thank you, no kids should be exposed to that as a role model. Adults should not be exposed to that. Our country should not be put in hands like that.
No obama
Posted by: seah | June 30, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Cass
He has worked across the aisle, so he would be lying if he said it was a mistake not to. Is that what you want?
It probably wasn’t a mistake to attend Trinity Church, either, although neither you nor I know enough about it to say.
As for “dropping them like a hot potato,” he was obviously hoping it would get you guys to finally SHUT THE F&@K UP about it.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
seah
You are right. You can’t trust a liar. So I’m not about to trust you on any of that crap, am I?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Hey Omentum,
Your chosen name is a globular sheet mostly containing fat that hangs down from the walls of the large intestine. Try define:omentum in google.
That sounds about right. All you have been doing here is cushioning colonic contents.
Too bad the nice education you gloat over didn’t include anatomy. Guess you have to be raised in a rat-filled trailer to know that one.
Please tell us now that you knew all along and chose the name on purpose – loser.
Posted by: Elwood | June 30, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Let us be real and imparcial, Sen Obama is the one who has attacked viciously Mr McCain.I believe is time for Mc Cain to take his gloves off and duke it out to end. McCain is not an mirroe image of Bush as the Obama campaing want to portray him and obviously because that IS THE ONLY THING OBAMA CAN COME WITH against a great american,a true patriot and man of honor.CHANGE ? What change ?? More taxes ? , More goverment intrusion on our lifes?? More bureocracy ??, No sir, I’m not gettin into that boat. If we want cahnge , How about changeing ourselves ? Get rid of that un needed piece of gas guzler and so many cars per household ?.Obama will serve the special interests masters that are paying for his campaing. He has been riding a free easy media. Where is his experience? How many bills has he has introduduced and passed thru the Senate ?? The tale is clear, Obama has a lot of talk but no substance and you FOOLS are falling for it. Good luck and I’m sure you will be ashame of yourselves if he gets elected. Mc Cain 08 , A true American , a Real Hero a man to trust.
Posted by: Frank | June 30, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
seah -
Oh, now “those people” are his “BEST FRIENDS,” right?
You’re really getting the knack of this lying thing, aren’t you?
What will they think of next?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Posted by: jock59801
Was she ever in that situation? NO. That women has succeeded in this great country and she should be thankful. Yes, there is a difference.
Posted by: J | June 30, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
In my last post it should have been woman. Sorry for the typo.
Posted by: J | June 30, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
annoyingrabbit
Bush already threw away that amount of money on Iraq, so what’s your point? Looks like McCain will keep the same amount going to Iraq indefinitely.
I’d rather have the money be used to help starving people in Africa, than to kill people in Iraq who in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
J
She is thankful.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
So, when exactly telling the truth is an issue. Obama clearly lacks credibility. He has as much credibility as Saddam Hussein has regarding disclosing his nuke plans to the UN Inspectors.
Obama is a liar. He lied about his associations with Rev. Wright, Tony Rezko and William Ayers.
Posted by: Roger Miller | June 30, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
McCain opposed MLK day at the time on the sole basis that another federal holiday would limit government services even more. He supported recognition, but just didn’t want government employees to take yet another day off. More recently, he abjectly apologized for failing to see the importance of MLK’s work and that a celebration of Mr. King merited shutting down the government for another day every year.
McCain makes mistakes and admits them. He mans up and attempts to change for the better. The only time I have even come CLOSE to hearing Obama do the same was when he admitted that getting into suspicious land deals with Tony Rezko was a “boneheaded” move. Obama has not admitted it was a mistake to stay in his racist church for 20 years and then drop them like a hot potato when it might affect his poll ratings; he has not admitted it was a mistake not to work across the aisle; etc.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Posted by: Cass | Jun 30, 2008 12:01:25 AM
——————
Do you fly your confederate flag on your pick up truck or porch?
Posted by: Merri | Jun 30, 2008 12:04:52 AM
——————
Dear Merri, you can’t argue substance can you? Don’t like it when facts are revealed and your ignorance and feeble slander is exposed? Or are you just disappointed because I chose your misrepresentation to expose rather than someone else’s? If any of the teachers who taught you logic, civics, or American History could see what you chose to write, I hope you would have the grace to be ashamed of yourself.
Posted by: Cass | June 30, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
My God, people. Listen to yourselves.
Is this who we are? Is this what America has become? Cut-throat, lying, and just plain mean? We’re dredging up the bottom-feeders now I guess.
I really WAS proud of my country at one time.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Roger Miller
Um, Saddam Hussein actually told the truth about his WMD (more or less). That’s what got us into this mess, remember?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
mcCain can’t be trusted.
mccain lies on family and friends and what he has done and not done, are vast and he keeps them coming.
You can’t trust a liar.
mccain changes his mind about what he believes in every couple days.
mccain make a stand on everything then he flip flops,
mccain’s history of voting is not where he stands today. So he votes one way then changes his beliefs to win votes.
If mccain can cheat on his wife and lie to you, he does not care about you.
If mccain changes his mind over things he says are important, then he has a problem with Judgment.
mccain’s lobbyist friends show he likes to hang with a crowd that cares nothing about average americans. The kind of people you would not associated with or want your kids to associate with. Terrorist provoking criminals and radical haters of the constitution. People he chose to be his best friends for over 20 years.
mccain is not trustworthy, Dependable or reliable and something not to believe in, Change brought about by him would not be good change.
Do we want the youth of America to look up to and want to be like mccain?
Cheat on his wife, call her a c**t for fun, hang with radical people, lie and misrepresent themselves, use people because he wants to be president.
No thank you, no kids should be exposed to that as a role model. Adults should not be exposed to that. Our country should not be put in hands like that.
No mccain
Posted by: Merri | June 30, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
I see no controversy in McCain’s points. They are factually correct and obvious. It is completely fair to point them out.
Posted by: WhatsNew | June 30, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
McCain is very confused. Who could blame him considering he is another Goose Stepping Kool-Aid drinking GOP lemming who is a Bush Clone. Remember that McCain is a Manchurian Candidate who has been groomed by his commie handlers to do everything possible to damage this country. His other wife got wised and was dumped into a a psych ward for awhile. Even is current wife – Cindy – was exposed to the truth and her drug problem was based on a pain management issue instead of the truth.
Posted by: David | June 30, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Obama cannot hath unite this blog, how can he unite thy country? Obama cannot unify or be unified.
Posted by: country_voter | June 30, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
annoying rabbit
If Republicans were ever going to help those “working families here having trouble putting food on the table,” then you might have a point. But the Republicans don’t to help ANYONE, just so they don’t run the risk of accidently helping someone who doesn’t “really” deserve it.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Saddam Hussein himself did not know that there was no progress because his subordinates were lying to him. Saddam Hussein was playing games with the international community.
So, Saddam’s credibility was zero. I am glad you did not argue Obama’s credibility is better than Saddam’s. The reason we had Iraq war because an inexperienced candidate like George W. Bush got into the White House. Obama is another one of those guys who wants to get into the White House before people know more about him.
There were some people (like Ralph Nader and some commentators) in 2000 who argued there was no difference between Gore and Bush. I think they should be thrown out of any newsroom if they are still working there.
Posted by: Roger Miller | June 30, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
My God, people. Listen to yourselves.
Is this who we are? Is this what America has become? Cut-throat, lying, and just plain mean? We’re dredging up the bottom-feeders now I guess.
I really WAS proud of my country at one time.
Posted by: jock59801 | Jun 30, 2008 12:27:44 AM
Posted by: Cass | June 30, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Roger Miller
Well, one difference is that Obama is about a hundred times smarter than Bush. He knows a lot more about the world (and everything else), and he surrounds himself with brilliant, experienced experts that he constantly listens to and argues with about policy issues that Bush has never even heard of.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Cass
Good point.
(I’m not all that sure about some of my neighbors, though. They could be in there typing away on these blogs!)
Anyway, that reminds me to go bring my flag in and try to remind myself why I really DO still love this country.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
McCain opposed MLK day at the time on the sole basis that another federal holiday would limit government services even more. He supported recognition, but just didn’t want government employees to take yet another day off. More recently, he abjectly apologized for failing to see the importance of MLK’s work and that a celebration of Mr. King merited shutting down the government for another day every year.
McCain makes mistakes and admits them. He mans up and attempts to change for the better. The only time I have even come CLOSE to hearing Obama do the same was when he admitted that getting into suspicious land deals with Tony Rezko was a “boneheaded” move. Obama has not admitted it was a mistake to stay in his racist church for 20 years and then drop them like a hot potato when it might affect his poll ratings; he has not admitted it was a mistake not to work across the aisle; etc.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Posted by: Cass | Jun 30, 2008 12:01:25 AM
——————
Do you fly your confederate flag on your pick up truck or porch?
Posted by: Merri | Jun 30, 2008 12:04:52 AM
——————
Dear Merri, you can’t argue substance can you? Don’t like it when facts are revealed and your ignorance and feeble slander is exposed? Or are you just disappointed because I chose your misrepresentation to expose rather than someone else’s? If any of the teachers who taught you logic, civics, or American History could see what you chose to write, I hope you would have the grace to be ashamed of yourself.
Posted by: Cass | Jun 30, 2008 12:24:05 AM
4444444444444444444444444
And what point are professing to argue?
Posted by: Merri | June 30, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
jock59801, Obama is changing his stand on every issue from left to right. Do you know what he stands for? Can any one trust this guy?
Bush claimed that he delegates and he said the same thing. That he will surround himself with smart people. Look where it got us.
Obama is wrong for America.
Posted by: Roger Miller | June 30, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Well, one difference is that Obama is about a hundred times smarter than Bush. He knows a lot more about the world (and everything else), and he surrounds himself with brilliant, experienced experts that he constantly listens to and argues with about policy issues that Bush has never even heard of.
Posted by: jock59801 | Jun 30, 2008 12:41:47 AM
———-
Jock, my apologies. It appears that you are actually one of the trolls. Adios.
Posted by: Cass | June 30, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Obama can’t be trusted.
His “words… just words” are lies are vast and he keeps them coming.
We cannot trust a liar.
B O changes his mind about his beliefs every couple days.
He is a hip-hop flip flopper!
His history of voting inbcludes one of the largest counts of “present” for any newbie senator because he can’t corral his beliefs and make them stick!
If mccain can cheat on his wife and lie to you, he does not care about you.
Should B O change his mind over things he says are important, then he chosses unwisely… difficulty with judgement calls when determined by anything other than getting votes!
His unsavory associates show he likes to hang with a crowd which cares nothing about the American people.
They are not the kind of people you would want your family to be associated with.
Terrorists, provoking criminals and radical haters of the constitution are the people he has chosen to be his best friends for over 20 years.
Obama is not trustworthy,dependable or reliable and should be considered questionable.
Change brought about by him would not be good change.
Do we want the youth of America to look up to and want to be like B O…or
like the American hero and statesman,
JOHN MCCAIN!
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY!!!
Posted by: lend an ear! | June 30, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Roger Miller
Well, I can keep track of him a lot better than I can McCain.
Is McCain for Bush’s tax cuts or not? I guess he is for offshore drilling, even though he wasn’t in the past. For obvious reasons he took a couragous stand against torture, until he gave in. What is his latest stand on immigration now? I can’t keep up.
The point is, if we are going to making this a smearing game, McCain ain’t necessarily going to win. Of course, he doesn’t have a chance anyway, so I guess it doesn’t really matter.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Look like McCain will lose this election to a crooked politician like Obama. Clearly, McCain is a lousy politician.
Posted by: crookedpolitician | June 30, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Well, you’ll all be glad to know it’s time for me to go.
Have fun racing each other to the bottom of the cess pool.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 30, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
If Republicans were ever going to help those “working families here having trouble putting food on the table,” then you might have a point. But the Republicans don’t to help ANYONE, just so they don’t run the risk of accidently helping someone who doesn’t “really” deserve it.
Jock, most working families don’t want help—-they want a fair chance to support and take care of themselves. You are obviously of the gimme mind set. Obamas taxing ways is not fair or helpful but blantantly destructive. Obama should keep his hands to himself and stop reaching into working families and small business pockets to steal their their paychecks that they worked for. Obama needs to go is nothing but a tax and spend crook.
Posted by: annoyingrabbit | Jun 30, 2008 12:55:22 AM
44444444444444444444444444
Most people want a government that is working for their benefit not just big business. However, bush and the republicans have made it clear that big business not people are their only concern. Bush and the republicans believe in taking from the poor and giving to the rich. Average americans are hurting badly under the weight of the republicans upside down reverse robin hood economic model. Things will change after the 08 election.
Posted by: Merri | June 30, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
The town hall meeting would be rigged. That’s why Obama hasn’t had one with McCain. The democrats learned their lesson during the last time they debated under GOP terms.
The last thing he needs are some Fox New like tactics launched against him during what should be a debate.
The republicans are scared because Obama isn’t falling for their tricks. Good for him. It was a smart move.
Posted by: Numinous | June 30, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
“Obama the Tax Terrorist”
What do you the patriotic McCain voter and Dem. against Obama?
Posted by: LJ | June 30, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
What do you think about this name for him? “Obama the Tax Terrorist”
This is what I was asking before I hit the wrong key.
Posted by: LJ | June 30, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
What do you think about this name for him? “Obama the Tax Terrorist”
This is what I was asking before I hit the wrong key.
Posted by: LJ | Jun 30, 2008 1:43:22 AM
4444444444444444444444444
Huh, what about the undone flip flop leprechaun as a name for mccain?
Posted by: Merri | June 30, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
Merri, thats weak.
Number one of the top ten.
“Obama the Tax Terrorist”
Posted by: LJ | June 30, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
Thanks, that means it’s okay. So Mccain the undone flip flop leprechaun it is.
Posted by: Merri | June 30, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
No one would believe McCain or any one from the Republican party, one that has consistently been lying to the American people. “Where’s WMD?” People will never forget how Bush lied to us to get into a very costly war. As to Obama, people have lost trust in him not because McCain says so, but because Obama himself has betrayed his supporters and, indeed shifted his position at the expense of the erosion of the constitution, specifically civil liberty. Obama has lost my (and my entire family’s) support because he as backtracked on his FISA position and his commitment to end the illegal war in Iraq.
Posted by: R. V. Harrington | June 30, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am
What really bothers me about Obama and the Liberals is their Paternalist views of the relationship between our Government and its citizens. In their view, they know the proper path for us and they demand the govt enforce it. Of course, we all know…the govt is the least efficient organization known to man. Voters…are you going to turn your life over to any govt??
Posted by: roger king | June 30, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am
Maybe its time for Obama to make a proposition to his Republican friends… that if they will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them.
Posted by: darklight46 | June 30, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Pretty soon all of America will see how phony Obama and the DNC really are.
McCain/Guiliani ’08
Posted by: Ryan | June 30, 2008, 5:11 am 5:11 am
Trust has to be earned. And it takes time and track record to earn it. Since Obama has very little track record, and significant contradictions between his rhetoric and his actions / affiliations, I cannot trust him. He is a RISKY choice.
Posted by: Unashamed_Independent | June 30, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am
Obama FLIP FLOPS
Rev. Wright
Trinity church
Nafta
Campaign finance
FISA
ADD… never has held a meeting as Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
ADD… all the present votes in the Illinois senate.
ADD… ONE trip to Iraq.
ADD… Admitted drug user.
ADD… Plagiarism
More to come.
Posted by: Be Independent | June 30, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
The Cuba embargo In January 2004, Obama said it was time “to end the embargo with Cuba” because it had “utterly failed in the effort to overthrow Castro.” Speaking to a Cuban American audience in Miami in August 2007, he said he would not “take off the embargo” as president because it is “an important inducement for change.”
Illegal immigration In a March 2004 questionnaire, Obama was asked if the government should “crack down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants.” He replied “Oppose.” In a Jan. 31, 2008, televised debate, he said that “we do have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation.”
Decriminalization of marijuana While running for the U.S. Senate in January 2004, Obama told Illinois college students that he supported eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana use. In the Oct. 30, 2007, presidential debate, he joined other Democratic candidates in opposing the decriminalization of marijuana.
Posted by: Be Independent | June 30, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am
I think that any Obama supporter who doesn’t agree with John McCain on some level and then looks at the change in Obama’s stance on FISA and NAFTA is just trying very hard not to deal with facts.
That is why so many Democrats will cross over and vote for the only person running this November whose words can be trusted. McCain 08.
Posted by: beebop | June 30, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
I don’t trust either of them or their respective parties. What a joke this election will be. Too bad the joke is on the average American voter.
Posted by: mhhunt | June 30, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
I like it…Obama is a Tax Terrorist…he needs to go.
Posted by: annoyingrabbit | June 30, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
I don’t trust either of them or their respective parties. What a joke this election will be. Too bad the joke is on the average American voter.
Posted by: mhhunt | Jun 30, 2008 8:35:01 AM
————————————
It is a very sad joke indeed.
We will soon be blasted with the BO lies in every corner of the globe..all elevator music is now a vote BO ad!
Vote BO is on all channels all day every day…..gagging. He is being marketed as the new Wonder Bread!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 30, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
All the dems had to do to easily win the presidency was to pick a half way decent candidate—and instead they give us the the lying idiot crook known as Obama. Why couldn’t we get just one decent person for the demmie nomination?
Posted by: annoyingrabbit | June 30, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Obama is the man of change.
He changes his mind.
Change Obama from being the Democratic Candidate.
His sign should read “Change me”
Posted by: A Girl from SC | June 30, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Obama is the man of change.
He changes his mind.
Change Obama from being the Democratic Candidate.
His sign should read “Change me”
Posted by: A Girl from SC | June 30, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Why couldn’t we get just one decent person for the demmie nomination?
Posted by: annoyingrabbit | Jun 30, 2008 9:05:27 AM
———————————
We did! The DNC then shot her!
They are still shoving Obama down our throats, we will never swallow this crap!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 30, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
easy to spot the paid Obama bloggers. They start off with McCain is a…..
just like in the primaries they started off with I am a former Clinton supporter, or I am a white/female/Jew/Republican/…….
Posted by: geevill | June 30, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
CAn’t be trusted.
Mcain have a spirited debate on hte issues
Mccain, obama can’t be trusted, and 2 negative ads so far.
Mcain no offshore drilling
Mccain offshore drilling
mccain no bush tax cuts
Mccain bush tax cuts
mccain hamas talks
mccain no hamas talks
mccain no deadlines in iraq
mccain troops oaut in 2012
mccain troops out in 100 years
mccain not important when troops come out
mccain beware agents of intolerance
mccain get endorsements of agents
mccain public finance of primaries
mccain no public finance of primary
so john who can we trust
Posted by: Lord of war | June 30, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
I wasn’t for offshore drilling either UNTIL the technology came along to make it reasonably safe for the environment. Since it is now reasonably safe………..I am all about offshore drilling.
Posted by: annoyingrabbit | June 30, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Check this out. Obama bill: $845 billion
more for global poverty
Democrat sponsors act OK’d by Senate panel
that would cost 0.7% of gross national product
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56405
The Tax Terrorist has arrived.
McCain 08. Because he is a better choice.
Posted by: McDaddy | June 30, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
If any of you Obama supporters ever followed along in your high School Goverment class or at least took basic Algebra you would realize that what Obama is Presenting is fantasy. Who does he think is going to pay for his proposed programs? There is not enough money in the budget. If he is elected and if he has the house and senate we are going to get taxed on everything Gas, income, groceries, you name it, it will be taxed. And if it is not taxed to the middle class then it will trickle down to the middleclass through increased prices that the large companies will be forced to increase due to the additional taxes levied upon them. The middle class will end up paying for all of these programs.
Obama supporters need to look at reality and quit being so EMOTIONAL.
Posted by: McDaddy | June 30, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Mcdaddy the usual fair of the republican scare machine. The old mantra the dems will tax. Well for the six years of bush and rep congress, they spent like a hollywood diva and never paid fro anything. Learn a new mantra
Posted by: lord of war | June 30, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Obama still means much higher taxes for everyone that works.
Posted by: chattyway | June 30, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/26/AR2008062603653.html
Posted by: geddesman | June 30, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Nader/Gonzalez 08
Posted by: geddesman | June 30, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Unless anybody here is willing to fly a fighter jet over enemy territory, knowing that thousands of yourcomrades have already been killed in the air, and on the ground, STFU. Lets see how any of you would fare being shot down, and dragged from the water by your enemy, already injured and in excruciating pain, and then spend 5 years as a tortured POW. let’s see how quick you all would open your mouths, and or say thing from being half dilerious. John McCain is far more worthy of the Presidency than some jr far left senator whos only claim to fame is a 20 year stint in a black liberation church.
Posted by: Badger | June 30, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Obama stated “We’ve got to make sure that people who have more money help the people who have less money.”
Mai stated “God helps those who help themselves. Each individual should be responsibile and accountable for their own action.”
Senator Obama is a modern day Robin Hood. Do we really want such a socialist in the White House? The USA should not be expected to support countries and individuals who are irresponsible or stupid.
Posted by: Mai | June 30, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Lord of War – Thats all you have to say? Such insite!!. this is not a scare tactic and I am not a republican. this is what your candidate represents. I voted for Hill and cannot support my parties presumed nominee. McCain has my full support. Look at his record. He crosses the aisle all the time. He is not a “conservative republican”
Posted by: McDaddy | June 30, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
And another thing. Arent you people sick and tired of the partisan politics in washington? They are not looking out for the countries well being, they are looking out for thier own party and getting re-elected. This has not been about the people for a long time.
McCain like Lieberman have been the Mavericks of thier party. They actually want to get things done. They are not partisan to the extreem like many Republican and Democrats are. They are not afraid to cross the aisle or see things differently than thier party.
They are leaders not followers.
The Jr Senator from Illinois cannot say the same. he is a Liberal Democrat that will tax and spend us to poverty.
Posted by: McDaddy | June 30, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
MCCAIN THE TRAITOR WHO SPILLED HIS GUTS IN 37 PROPAGANDA FILMS FOR THE COMMIES.
MCACIN WHO HAS A STATUE ERECTED TO HIM IN HANOI.
MCCAIN WHOSE HANOI JAILER SAID TAUGHT HIM ENGLISH (SO THAT HE COULD INTERROGATE OTHER POWS)
MCACIN WHO CALLED POW/MIA FAMILES “NUTS” TO THEIR FACES AND THEN STORMED OUT OF THE SENATE POW/MIA HEARING.
MCCAIN WHO TOOK BRIBES FROM KEATING IN THE LINCOLN S&L SCANDAL.
MCCAIN WHO HAD FIVE DC LOBBYISTS AS HIS TOP ADVISORS.
MCCAIN HAS NO HONOR.
MCCAIN IS A SELF-SERVING LIAR.
Posted by: CHUCK | June 30, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
MCCAIN’S DADDY WAS AN ADMIRAL.
MCCAIN’S MOTHER WAS AN OIL HEIRESS
MCCAIN = MORE WAR + HIGHER OIL PRICES
Posted by: CHUCK | June 30, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
SALLY,
YOU FORGOT ONE THING…
THE REFORM DEMOCRATS UNDER JFK AND HUMPHREY PUSHED FOR CIVIL RIGHTS.
IN 1965, THE DIXIECRATS MOVED EN MASSSES INTO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WHEN THE MISSISSIPPI DELEGATIONB WAS NOT SEATED FOR OPPOSSING INTEGRATION.
IT WAS AT THAT POINT THAT EVERY KKK LOVER JOINED THE GOP AND THAT’S WHAT WE HAVE TO THIS DAY.
YOU DON’T SEE THE DEMS PRAISING STROM THURMOND AND TRENT LOTT NOWADAYS, BUT THE GOP DOES.
SALLY, I WAS THERE AND LIVED THRU IT, SO, YOU CAN’T B.S. ME WITH THAT GARBAGE.
LINCOLN AND EISENHOWER BELONGED TO A FAR DIFFERENT GOP THAN TODAY’S GOP WHICH IS SO OFTEN THE KKK AUXILIARY.
Posted by: CHUCK | June 30, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Chuck-
i think you are the liar about McCain.
Posted by: jschmidt | June 30, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
I wonder if Martin Luther King Jr. would agree with Mr. Obama? I think not… because MLK was a Republican.
http://www.nationalblackrepublicans.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.DYK-Why+MLK+was+a+Republican&tp_preview=true
444444444444444444444444
I hope you’re not stupid enough to believe Dr. Martin Luther King would be associated the republican party of today of Clarence Thomas or are you?
Posted by: Merri | July 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
I hope you’re not stupid enough to believe Dr. Martin Luther King would be associated with the republican party of today or Clarence Uncle Thomas or are you?
Posted by: Merri | July 1, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
You are absolutely right, John McCain: This election is about trust.
Can the American voters trust you not to continue waging wars around the world? NO!
Can the American voters trust you to bring home their sons and daughters from Afghanistan and Iraq? NO!
Can the suffering Americans trust you to do somethiing tangible – and not use platitudes – to ease their suffering. NO!
So what if Obama changed his mind about taking Federal Funding? How does that affect the average Joe and Jane. Can you explain it? NO!
THIS IS TRULY THE SILLY SEASON.
GO OBAMA. THE PRESIDENCY BELONGS TO YOU!
Posted by: exatlantic | July 1, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
Speaking of Obama: OBAMA IS AN EXCELLENT PRESIDENT!
Obama is a racial-minority individual and does not like racism:
I know it may be hard to believe.
However, it is absolutely true that Ronald Wilson Reagan committed horrible, racist, hate crimes during his presidency.
A lot of people know about Reagan’s infamy.
And a lot of people will know about Reagan’s infamy–even until the end of human existence: they’ll find out.
Numbers 32:23: “Be sure your sins will find you out.”
- A.W.
(I can type 90 words per minute, and there are thousands of copies on the Internet indicating the content of this post. And there are at least hundreds of copies in very many countries around the world.)
_________________
‘If only it were possible to BAN invention that bottled up memories like scent so they never faded and never got stale.’ (Once again, please consider an illustrative analogy: like scent that is held in or restrained or inhibited or suppressed or bottled up.) Off the top of my head, it came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.
Posted by: Reagan's forever infamy | March 26, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm