By Ed O'Keefe

Jun 23, 2008 9:58am

Obama Brand: Truth or Consequences

Opinion by Matthew Dowd, ABC News Political Contributor

In analyzing communications, connections and acceptance by voters in politics or even consumers in business, the most important element is the "brand".

The brand being what is the core value encapsulated in the candidate through which voters accept or reject what is communicated.

In politics, while mechanics/tactics (advertising, mail, grassroots, etc.) are important, they pale in importance to the brand. And what is crucial in any campaign is protecting at all costs the brand of the candidate –- the authentic core of who the person is, why they are running, and how they would lead.

Obama’s brand is new to the political marketplace and it is especially in need of protection by him and his campaign.

What is his brand?

From my perspective it is something that involves a new kind of politics, something that doesn’t involve political expediency, something that gets past the spin of Washington, something that involves truth and inspiration in order to get the job done.

That is why I believe Obama and his campaign made a blunder flip flopping on public campaign finance for the general election.

Obama had said for many months he would abide by public financing in the fall and now has decided against doing just that. As Liz Sidoti of Associated Press wrote, "Barack Obama chose winning over his word."

Not a good thing at all for his brand. Is it lethal? Probably not, but it’s a mistake.

The more interesting thing is that he didn’t need to do this.

The way the system works he could have outraised and vastly outspent McCain in the next 90 days before the Democratic convention because primary dollars are still in place. After the convention, he basically only has eight weeks left and spending a little less than $90 million dollars (which is the public finance amount) effectively is going to be all but impossible.

The urban myth in presidential politics (which media consultants don’t like to hear) is that paid advertising is key — it absolutely isn’t!

The most important part of the campaign is not gross rating points, but the narrative in the free press. And Obama could have gone along with public financing and still raised millions of dollars for the DNC which could conduct grassroots organizing on behalf of the entire ticket. And if you look at the polls generic Democrats do much better than Obama himself.

Politically, on behalf of both his brand and the effective conduct of the campaign, it was an error for Obama to choose tactics over truth.

By the way, isn’t that exactly why most people in this country are upset at the current administration????

User Comments

If you think not blowing off 300 mil is a mistake by Obama then you are obviously partial to McCain. ABC the anti Obama rag….

Posted by: Jim | June 23, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

The most important thing is “the narrative of the free press”. That really says it all about the incredible boost Obama got from the mainstream media in disposing of Hillary Clinton!
That fawning media was the key.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 23, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

I think that obamas campaign is pretty smart, i dont think they would have gone against this without some sort of plan.
Which we all figure is a massive attempt to play in every state, we just dont know exactly what thats going to actually be like. It is obviously much larger then 90 million otherwise why take the hits…
or perhaps they figure mccains brand has been terribly tarnished as well, since they can point to mccains dealings with public financing and his possible illegal movement in and out of public financing and that loan.
It may seem like a silly move, but obamas campaign is very calculated

Posted by: bhrandon | June 23, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

“From my perspective it is something that involves a new kind of politics, something that doesn’t involve political expediency, something that gets past the spin of Washington, something that involves truth and inspiration in order to get the job done.” The brand was damaged long before the flip flop on public financing. Obama has always been about political expediency as his association with Rev. Wright’s church for 20 yrs proves. I actually hope that relationship was about political expediency and does not represent what Obama thinks is ‘truth’ or ‘inspiration’.

Posted by: mpCT | June 23, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

forgotton already. At least makes some sense when compaired to McCains antics and deal making with the public finance moneys.

Posted by: actually | June 23, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

If the man can’t keep his word that he gave during the Primaries then why would he keep his word about anything he says for the GE? The man is a Fraud and an embarassment to the Dems. Remember the superdelegates haven’t voted yet and can still change their minds. Go Hillary… please don’t support this BUM!!!

Posted by: mich mike | June 23, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Obama’s brand reminds me of laundry detergent box a few years ago. Every time I buy the 29 oz box, it always costs me $15.99. Three years later, it’s still the same price, but I one day start to notice that the weight has decreased to 20 oz, but the price and the box remains the same.
Obama should clean up his acts.

Posted by: laundry_brand | June 23, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

As a former Hillary supporter, I’m looking forward to voting for Obama because his plans for the US most resemble hers. She has endorsed him and so I’m going to make sure he gets my vote. McCain’s policies go against everything Hillary was promoting, and there’s no way in good conscience I could ever vote for McCain.
That said, I’m fed up with the media. I’m sick of op/ed pieces scolding Obama about campaign financing while completely ignoring the laws McCain has broken – he even broke a law he wrote (McCain/Feingold)! The author of this article makes his point clear – he would shake his skinny little finger at Obama but he has no opinion about McCain breaking campaign finance laws. By not explaining this issue in full, the media and people like Matthew Dowd, are lying by omission.

Posted by: mojopo | June 23, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

According to a detailed analysis appearing on today’s MSNBC web site, Obama is in bed with the ethanol industry and opposes imports of the more efficient cane fuel. His advisers are influential lobbyists of large Agra-business.
Same old Obama, different day! And still fooling some of the people all of the time!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 23, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Check this one:
===============
Jonathan Martin
Mon Jun 23, 1:25 AM ET
The same publisher that distributed the 2004 best-seller that took aim at John Kerry’s Vietnam service is planning a summer release of what’s scheduled to be the first critical book on Barack Obama.
ADVERTISEMENT
Conservative journalist David Freddoso’s “The Case Against Barack Obama” will offer “a comprehensive, factual look at Obama,” according to Regnery Publishing president and publisher Marjory Ross.
But the book’s subtitle makes clear its perspective: “The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media’s Favorite Candidate.”
Ross contends that the mainstream media has offered insufficient scrutiny of Obama and likens the goal of Freddoso’s book to that of “Unfit for Command,” the scathing assessment of Kerry’s war record that rocketed to No. 1 on The New York Times best-seller list.
By highlighting negative aspects of Obama’s record and background, Ross says, Freddoso may compel others to offer more critical coverage of the Democratic nominee.
“I think it’s critically important that the country gets a clear and honest view of who is running and what they stand for — warts and all,” Ross says. “With ‘Unfit for Command,’ like ‘The Case against Barack Obama,’ we believe the media has whitewashed the candidate.”
But unlike the Kerry book, which was co-authored by a fellow Swift Boat veteran and focused exclusively on the Massachusetts senator’s actions in Vietnam and immediately after, “The Case Against Barack Obama” aspires to be a full-length political biography

Posted by: Redneck | June 23, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Is anyone really foolish enough to think Obama does not have blind ambition and wants to win at any cost? Come on. He has postured himself to do just that and he will continue to lie, change his mind, and do whatever he has to to win. Look what they’re doing to Michele. They’re making her look like another soft wife of a president, does anyone believe that is who she is???
Come on people wake up. He is a loser, and cannot be trusted to be the president of the most powerful country on earth.
I am a devout democrat. This man is not worthy of my vote and will never get it.

Posted by: nobama | June 23, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Is it paranoia that kept him from the fixed amount of money? Is he afraid of the damage the 527′s can do to him, and if so, why? What’s out there? That’s the thing that keeps me from getting excited about Obama, and makes me miss Hillary so badly.

Posted by: Dee | June 23, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Obama — full of BS; signifying nothing!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 23, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Obama went back on his word–
It’s that simple.
For a “change” candidate, he comes across as an opportunist–I am democrat and totally fed up with Obama and the Obama campaign antics. No vote for Obama–and that goes for my family and friends (all democrats).
Way to go-Obama! Once again you have proven you cannot be trusted.

Posted by: PA voter | June 23, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

NO vote for Hussein Obama.
My family members,friends, we all
say NO to Hussein Obama in november.
Hussein is an opportunist,fake and
the BIGGEST joke of the century……

Posted by: Redneck | June 23, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Obama is for change. He changes is positions time after time after time.

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 23, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

While suturing a cut on the hand of a 75-year-old Texas rancher, whose hand
was caught in a gate while working cattle, the doctor struck up a
conversation with the old man. Eventually the topic got around to Obama and
his bid to be President.
The old rancher said, ‘Well, ya know, Obama is a ‘post turtle’.’
Not being familiar with the term, the doctor asked him what a ‘post turtle’
was. The old rancher said, ‘When you’re driving down a country road and you
come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that’s a ‘post
turtle’.’
The old rancher saw a puzzled look on the doctor’s face, so he continued to
explain. ‘You know he didn’t get up there by himself, he doesn’t belong up
there, he doesn’t know what to do while he is up there, and you just wonder
what kind of a person put him up there to begin with.’

Posted by: Aston | June 23, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

The consultants who analyzed the landscape and pushed their candidate to reach this conclusion stand to make untold millions from the bumped-up media buys. That’s it, pure and simple. They are not objective. Mr. Dowd is correct — he could have won under the good government rules and not broken the back of the public financing system, as he will now do.
The fact that he listened to these mercenaries speaks volumes about his experience and judgment.

Posted by: commonsensenj | June 23, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Too bad for America that electing a president has become a matter of “branding” and a popularity contest. I think that’s the number one reason the nation is in such lousy shape and in such desperate need of real leadership. We’re not choosing a beer here people.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 23, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

boo hoo hoo, the hippie press is worried because of someone’s “brand” and because he doesn’t follow their ideals. public campaign financing is a sham and a waste of money; the problem isn’t that Obama got off it, the problem is that McCain is taking it.

Posted by: 1percenter | June 23, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

1percenter: Why is that?

Posted by: Aston | June 23, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Let him through all that fat-cat money back into circulation. It is a transfer of the wealth from the rich down to people like me. Let him spend away!

Posted by: Ben Straub | June 23, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Sadly, this isn’t the worst of it. FISA? NAFTA? So much rhetoric just to get Hillary Clinton out of the race. Now that the field is clear, the real candidate comes to life. Not DC politics, Chicago politics.

Posted by: beebop | June 23, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I really do not care about this. Who really cares?
And to be honest with you, I do believe his words was he would consider setting down with McCain when the times comes to try to come to an agreement, from day one I am not sure he knew how he would handle this issue.
Now, you want someone who lies and flip flops daily on you, that would be McCain and not just with the small stuff, it is the BIG STUFF.

Posted by: becky | June 23, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Anti-Obama book in in the works:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080623/pl_politico/11263
Obama wants to get elected so eagerly, before people know the real him.
Wake up!

Posted by: golfgirlusa | June 23, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

$300 million cannot buy integrity. HUGE mistake, but then again obama is who he is. No fluff cover of People magazine can change that.

Posted by: geevill | June 23, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

As much as it might seem unlikely, I am
not convinced that Obama will be the
nominee come August. Hillary might be
“campaigning’ with him, but has anyone thought that by doing that she remains in the spotlight? This race is not over till the fat lady sings.
Glen

Posted by: Glen | June 23, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Obama Moves To Reintroduce Himself to Voters
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/22/AR2008062201964.html?hpid=topnews
Obama Has proven he needs some mental health time.
The guy is going over the deep end.
I guess he found some more funding, to launch a redo Michelle Campiagn.
Now to redo Himself Campaign.
Some Please tell Him this is the race for President of the United States.
Not the Jr High Pep rally king and queen.
hotline at 847-697-2380
Mr Obama Local toll free number for you. You can even add it to speed dial.

Posted by: seah5 | June 23, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

This article, Obama’s 143 Days of Senate Experience, from by Cheri Jacobus is funny. Obama and our nation is getting more and more ridiculous.
“Just how much Senate experience does Barack Obama have in terms of actual work days? Not much.
From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate. That’s how many days the Senate was actually in session and working.
After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
143 days — I keep leftovers in my refrigerator longer than that.
In contrast, John McCain’s 26 years in Congress, 22 years of military service including 1,966 days in captivity as a POW in Hanoi now seem more impressive than ever. At 71, John McCain may just be hitting his stride.”

Posted by: 143_days | June 23, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Name ANY candidate that hasn’t changed their mind several times in the past six months.
There are NONE. McCain, Obama, and Clinton all reversed their positions more than once.
Calling a politician a “flip-flopper” or a “liar” is like handing out speeding tickets at the Indianapolis 500.

Posted by: Reality | June 23, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Aston: Public financing of campaigns makes no sense to me whatsoever. It does not stop the peddling of influence on D.C.; it is a socialist way of running campaigns. Where does the money come from? It’s the US Treasury, so we all end up paying for the largess of these campaigns (whether we like the candidate or not). There is absolutely nothing wrong with lobbying groups and so-called special interests funding political campaigns – it is free speech to do so and the courts have agreed on that multiple times.
So, to me, McCain is taking food stamps for no reason. He needs to just go out and raise money the ol’ fashioned way. If he has something good to sell, he’ll have no shortage of people willing to buy.

Posted by: 1percenter | June 23, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

143 days in the senate.
Obama has just about that many present votes over 100 present votes. Where he choose not to do his job. Choose not to take a stand for people.
Obama works with mind conditioning and manipulation. The only truth his followers will know is what Obama tells them is the truth, whether it is or not.
He owns them.

Posted by: Sharon | June 23, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

McCain opt[ed] into public financing, accepted the spending limits and then profited from that opt-in by securing a campaign saving loan. And then he used some clever, but not clever enough lawyering, to opt back out. And the person charged with saying what flies and what doesn’t — the Republican head of the FEC — said he’s not allowed to do that. He can’t opt out unilaterally unless the FEC says he can.
The most generous interpretation of what happened is that McCain’s lawyer came up with an ingenious legal two step that allowed him to double dip in the campaign finance system, eat his cake and spend it too. But even if you buy that line, successful gaming of the system doesn’t really count as strict adherence. And the point is irrelevant since the head of the FEC — a Republican — says McCain cannot do this on his own.

Posted by: bhrandon | June 23, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

There is nothing new about Obama’s politics. He runs the dirtiest campaign I have witnessed so far. The only thing is that he has somehow managed to get the fawning media to overlook all his flaws. The good news though is that his campaign has lost momentum. Support for Obama started waning towards the end of the Democratic primary. In fact, I sense some of the media are beginning to be disillusioned by was they see as a false dawn. Obama is a fake. Campaign contributions for Obama are falling. Now this country awaits for a bigger skeleton to be pulled out from his closet. Rev. Wright, Tony Rezko…who next.

Posted by: janephil | June 23, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Anyone who puts a politician up on a pedestal is looking for disappointment. And for you to compare your old boss and his tactics with the public financing issue and Obama is pretty ridiculous and rather insulting.
Obama built off the grassroots fund raising that Dean started years ago and bravo to him. He’s allowed to change his mind on issues. And guess what? It probably won’t be the last time that happens! I know, shocking! Obama is not an angel and a pure idealist brand icon. And yes, he has ambition, is that surprising news? Look at his age and the fact that he is running for President…
The Beltway and the Press may want to spin this happening into a cover story but to echo Donna Brazile on This Week yesterday, it’s funny to see folks (like you) try to make this a bigger deal. In terms of his brand, it’s just not.

Posted by: tm | June 23, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Obama = Hypocrite

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 23, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Should anyone wonder what is happening to this country just think about this…The Dems want to elect someone with NO experience. We are the result of the people we have put into office to represent us. I used to be proud of my country and I still am but the people living in this country and their changing attitudes scares the heck out of me. Obama isn’t going to change anything but his mind, which he does on a regular basis. For this countrys sake wake up and realize whom you are voting for. If you don’t research this man you will be standing here four years from now wondering what the hell happened…

Posted by: Glenda | June 23, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

When this election is over, Obama’s strategy of declining public financing may turn out to be a very wise choice.
Granted, he is going to take a lot of political flak about the decision, especially from the Republicans. But, its doing several things to his benefit too. You can’t turn on a news program, or listen to a talk show without his decision being mentioned; and his strategy being second guessed from every angle. This emphasizes his abilities and the strengths of his staff.
Also, Barack has been taking a lower profile recently, and with the media focused on this issue, his next move may largely be unnoticed until it happens.
This focus on the attacks about Barack’s character tends to bring his supporters together, and energize them against what many interpret as unfair. The Republican snipes may actually be playing into his hand.
Most importantly, however, this supports Barack’s plan of CHANGING THE WAY WASHINGTON WORKS, and his latest move is surely going to change the way campaigns are financed. Win or lose, he has already begun to change the status quo.
We are seeing history being made.

Posted by: Scott | June 23, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

ABC still a reliable republican shill, I see.

Posted by: drindl | June 23, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Just another example of Obama not just being a fraud but a bonefide idiot. He is incapable of fully thinking thru a problem with or without a telepromter.

Posted by: stockkitty101 | June 23, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

143_days: Need you be reminded as well as Cheri Jacobus using her analogy, that John McCain who now enjoys a 61%, That’s sixty one percent, ABSENTEE record from his job as a U.S. Senator, (# 1 of all 100 Senators, would comparably have only 9 years of service in his elected position. Furthermore, when equating experience, it’s naive to not consider experience of a state legislator where they have a more direct contact with their constituents. Especially from a state of 16 million population and as diverse as Illinois as compared to a state such as Arizona with a 6 million population. Also just how can anyone equate 1,966 days sitting in a cell as a learning experience for President?

Posted by: devilkev | June 23, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

I would like to point out to Dowd the maneuver by McCain and his lobbyist campaign chair, Rick Davis, in the establishment of the “McCain 2008 General Election Compliance Fund.” As Davis described this backdoor move for financing, “a new hybrid legal”, method of raising funds. Fund raising so far in this political contest has created some anomalies. While Barack Obama has enjoyed record breaking totals, the DNC has been lackluster in their efforts to raise capital. Just the opposite for Republicans, McCain has had problems while the RNC has out raised the DNC 6-1. McCain’s situation has been attributed to his lack luster appeal to the Republican deep pocket movers and shakers who are spending their capital to finance more state local elections in battleground states where it looks like their incumbent Republican Congressmen or Senators will have problems. On the Obama front where it appears likely that Senator Obama will win the Presidency, the movers and shakers of the DNC have been holding back their capital for local levels in light of the phenomenal success of Obama’s fund raising, and hoping his success will spill over to state level’s, which to some extent it has as witnessed by the recent special elections at state level won by Democrats. Obama, by continuing on the same fund raising track he has been on has also announced the establishment of campaign efforts hopefully in all 50 states. Had he accepted public financing, he would not have been able to do this and battle the plans of McCain and the RNC combined.

Posted by: devilkev | June 23, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

devilkev,
1966 days in a Hanoi cell is simply more patriotic than 7300 days as a member of Trinity church, worshipping Wright.

Posted by: 7300_days | June 23, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Obama is the biggest hypocrit in the whole election. He will put his self-interest on the top of his principles. This is not the change we can believe in.

Posted by: george | June 23, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

nobama………good post..

Posted by: Barb | June 23, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

So true. Obama’s piggishness will come back to haunt him. Paid media advantages of 3 and 4 to one could not save Obama’s candidacy in PA, WV or KY. He got blasted out of the water by a near bankrupt Hillary Clinton. Why? Because many folks just won’t vote for him. No amount of slick advertising will change that. It will only pile on and offend. More than that his fundraising prowess will crowd out the ability of other Dems and the DNC to raise money causing trouble on the down ballot. Worse his fund raising juggernaut seems to be losing steam. After all, if you are working three jobs so you pay for your handicapped sister’s health insurance how much more money can you give to Barack Obama? More likely he will need to start to press the flesh among the fat cats and further contribute to his elitist image while John McCain, ever stolid, cruises on, maverick that he is shooting his straight talk in the back of the bus and winning our hearts and minds slowly and surely from the empty suit — all five of them.

Posted by: Pete Kent | June 23, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Washington politics! Same ol’ same ol’

Posted by: LongT | June 23, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

*I* thought it was funny that McCain had his best fundraising month to date in May. His Primary was done in March. So if he wasn’t taking donations for the Primary, what was he doing?
1. He was going to spend all of his donations before September attacking Obama, get $89 million, and then use the government’s money to attack him again, or
2. He’d found a weasel away the no donations for the general election.
For somebody who claims to be in favor of campaign finance reform, McCain is a master of cheating on it. And he should be, since he wrote it. If I were Obama, once I saw the fundraising numbers for McCain in May, I wouldn’t accept public financing either. It’s obvious that McCain was not being honest on it.

Posted by: Matthew H | June 23, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Well it’s like Obama said to Canada. Don’t worry about it; it is only campaign rhetoric. Obama’s promise for change in politics… JUST WORDS. The big speech he gave stating that ONLY when you run solely on public financing can you be free of lobbyists. And he is still taking money from Rezko’s bundlers; as of the fundraiser just last week.
Nobama for me. I vote for hope. I think I’ll write in Hillary’s name and HOPE she wins.

Posted by: Deborah C | June 23, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Would it be possible for Obama supports to promise to shut their mouth when they hear a candidate in the future, especially a Republican one, forsake public financing of a campaign? Naw, I guess that was a stupid question!

Posted by: Bill Carson | June 23, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

They are both absolutely horrible excuses for candidates. However, Obama is not the essence of unification as some believe. I see millions of Americans being fooled by empty promises that emphasize NO personal responsibility of any kind. Bob Barr in 2008 for sure.

Posted by: MattW | June 23, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Ever since Barack started lying in March about what he knew and when he knew it concerning Jeremiah Wright’s anti-American ravings, Barack has been contradicting his projected image as someone who abhors politic as usual. Even Jeremiah said he was just another politician.
His latest ad lies about him passing legislation he had nothing to do with.

Posted by: Mugwump | June 23, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Obama has his own brand alright!! The brand that keeps on giving!! He has, again, managed to irritate Hillary supporters by saying “they will get over it”!! Big surprise, Obama, we will NOT “get over it”!! We are supporting McCain in droves and if you think that you can now ask Hillary to be veep because you NEED her…forget that too! We don’t want you!!!

Posted by: michafaith | June 23, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Since his victory in primary Obama has damaged his brand. Obama promised he will bring new fram work of politics to washington based on three principles :
Diplomacy vs war , going beyond idendity politics and lobby politics, and truth.
One can not says that he is to reduce lobby influance but the first meeting he attand id AIPAC meeting that is one the most powerful lobby group in washington and one the main supporter of Iraq war.
Obama can not win by siding with exterme right.

Posted by: asori | June 23, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Obama has his own brand alright!! The brand that keeps on giving!! He has, again, managed to irritate Hillary supporters by saying “they will get over it”!! Big surprise, Obama, we will NOT “get over it”!! We are supporting McCain in droves and if you think that you can now ask Hillary to be veep because you NEED her…forget that too! We don’t want you!!!

Posted by: michafaith | June 23, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

bhrandon–”I think that obamas campaign is pretty smart, i dont think they would have gone against this without some sort of plan”. The OBAMA campaign has decided that truth is worthy of a “change” too and winning is just too important to keep your word. Most of his followers do not care about “his word” anyway, they just want him to win because he is ______ (can’t say the word because I will be accused of being a racist). And, this is not his first flip-flop, nor will it be his last.

Posted by: Ann | June 23, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

The brand is about removing the influences of Big Money, Corporate donors in politics, and replacing it with the influence of the public (Public finance, small donors). Flip flop is in the eyes of those who wish it to be so. Obama’s stance/brand is consistent….

Posted by: NO Big money. Lots of small Money.. | June 23, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Love the post turtle story.Of couse we know who put him up there-the crooked Chicago pols. Too bad the rest of the country doesn’t have the intelligence and insight of a 75 year old Texas farmer!

Posted by: Marross | June 23, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Thse idiotic stupid super delegates need to do some homework on this empty suit before that August convention. He is not fit to be our President and he comes from the cess pool of Chicago politics. Obama has many dirty little secrets and more scandals and hop[efully they all come out before he actually becomes he NOMINEE. All his oratory and chants are masking the real man who has no experience and one who has risen on other peoples coattails and work to get where he is. “Post turtle ” sums it up perfectly. Don’t be fooled by this Pied Piper. Wake up America

Posted by: JIMBO | June 23, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Matthew Dowd: Truth or Republican Politics
“Dowd has worked for Democrats such as the late Sen. Lloyd Bentsen and Lt. Gov. Bob Bullock, (who) and Republicans including Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and President George W. Bush, for whom he was chief strategist in 2004″
Lets repeat that: “chief strategist in 2004 for George Bush” are we really going to listen to and believe Bush’s strategist?

Posted by: JR | June 23, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

The flip-flop doesn’t matter. It was engineered by Obama’s handlers, anyway. They’re the ones driving this campaign, not the empty suit behind the teleprompter. Obama will lose because of his “three A’s”: Accomplishments(None), Attitude(Elitist), Associates(Unsavory).

Posted by: Alan | June 23, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

nobama,antiobama,byeobama etc etc
the time has come its time for a change
forget your bitterness as a gopist or clintonite life goes on. Forget about the past think about the future.

Posted by: curobama | June 23, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

nobama,antiobama,byeobama etc etc
the time has come its time for a change
forget your bitterness as a gopist or clintonite life goes on. Forget about the past think about the future.

Posted by: curobama | June 23, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

I really, really, want to see Obama debate McCain over policy, not have his closed meetings with swooning supporters that think electing a president is the same as picking your favorite rock star. Some of his policy seems way out there and not cohesive with what we need in this rapidly evolving crisis here in our country. We need to balance out what we are doing right now. There isn’t this open checkbook for entitlements that he wants to shower on everybody. We can’t even pay our bills now. He makes no sense. Do you really want the far left to call all of your shots. They want huge government? Where has that gotten us.

Posted by: James France | June 23, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Dowd is a republican shill.

Posted by: JR | June 23, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

“Branding”? I’m glad I read RealClearPolitics.com where one gets a real-time sense of how terms like this enter the pundit vocabulary. A brand is expressly designed to hide all kinds of things – real value, real quality, real usefulness. So why use it? It’s a term the media uses to simplify a complex political world.

Posted by: twang | June 23, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

michafaith — You are SO CORRECT. Obama has not an ounce of good judgment—you can ask any other man on this planet if you tell your wife “get over it” what do you think her reaction is going to be?! Hasn’t Obama learned anything about woman—you know a woman scorned! We do not like the man because he has TOO MANY FLAWS, HIS TIES to a black supremest church, who audience laughs when they hear the hateful comments directed toward whites—he calls professional woman “sweeties” and now he says “get over it”. I could go on but not enough time to waste on this man. No Barack Hussein Obama in 2008.

Posted by: Ann | June 23, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Don’t worry about Obama’s position on any issue. It will “CHANGE” if he needs to change it. Obama, the Mitt Romney of the democratic party.
Flip-flop, flip-flop, flip-flop, say and do anything to get elected.
Obama, the Joke.

Posted by: Roger Miller | June 23, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Obama has judgment. Say anthing and do anything to get elected. Attended a racist church, pretended to be a post-racial candidate. Behaves worse than a typical politician, talks about new politics.
Now, the bloody fools who supported Obama, the joke is on you.

Posted by: Roger Miller | June 23, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I can think of many things that might damage the Obama brand but forgoing public finance is not one of them. This is only an issue in the minds of beltway types and in particular right wing beltway types like Dowd who will do anything they can to prevent an Obama presidency. Basically electoral finance is riddled with loopholes and the public knows it. These loopholes are exploited by both left and right, usually a bit more effectively by the right because the business world which has the money tends to favor the Republicans. Now for the first time a Democratic presidential candidate appears to have more money than the Republican so of course they all start expressing shock and horror. Give it a break Dowd you’re as phony as a $3 bill.

Posted by: John | June 23, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Smoke, mirrors, empty promises and broken pledges.
All aboard Obama supporters! The next Pied Piper departs Hamlin in 15 minutes.

Posted by: Peter | June 23, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Smoke, mirrors, empty promises and broken pledges.
All aboard Obama supporters! The next Pied Piper departs Hamlin in 15 minutes.

Posted by: Peter | June 23, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

The NYTs reported today that Obama is being supported big time by the ethanol special interests. He has corn silk growing out of those big ears of his. It’s a joke to suggest that he is not influenced by big money. And what about big labor? Or his buddy the shadowy George Soros? Will Mike Meyers play him in the movie? He has so many people fooled. Bunncha dopes!

Posted by: Pete Kent | June 23, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

McCain may not have as much money, but the people will trust him more than Obama. When the time comes to vote, people will ask themselves who is this Obama and what does he stand for. McCain is well known and people know his weakness and strengths and just trust him more and he will be elected. It will be close but he will win.

Posted by: barefootboy9 | June 23, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

I believe Obama did the right thing by turning down public financing. First of all, didn’t McCain get burned by a 527 during the primaries…By an Ultra-Conservative within his own party? The Republican Attack Machine is primed and pumped for the general election, and the talking points are already being pushed that Obama flip-flopped on an important stance. But if I’m in business, why would I want to cut my product line by fifty percent, in order to give my competitor a fair shake? So you say that Obama is not about change? How can change take place if the person who is talking about change ties both hands behind his back in a fight to win the Presidency? Obama got tagged with heavy punches constantly during the primaries, and to a fault didn’t fight back like I thought he should have. If I was the one that raised $230 mil. during the primaries, and decided to take a loss of $140 mil during a similar period against a political pro that will gain the backing of 527′s who will attack with impunity, I’d deserve to lose. The only reason why McCain is taking public funding is because he BORROWED public money to keep his primary campaign afloat. He needs parity to stay in the race with Obama. Obama is in to win, but he’s also in this race to bring about real change in the White House. Let’s hope once Obama is elected that the rest of Washington will follow.

Posted by: ji_john | June 23, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

I believe Obama did the right thing by turning down public financing. First of all, didn’t McCain get burned by a 527 during the primaries…By an Ultra-Conservative within his own party? The Republican Attack Machine is primed and pumped for the general election, and the talking points are already being pushed that Obama flip-flopped on an important stance. But if I’m in business, why would I want to cut my product line by fifty percent, in order to give my competitor a fair shake? So you say that Obama is not about change? How can change take place if the person who is talking about change ties both hands behind his back in a fight to win the Presidency? Obama got tagged with heavy punches constantly during the primaries, and to a fault didn’t fight back like I thought he should have. If I was the one that raised $230 mil. during the primaries, and decided to take a loss of $140 mil during a similar period against a political pro that will gain the backing of 527′s who will attack with impunity, I’d deserve to lose. The only reason why McCain is taking public funding is because he BORROWED public money to keep his primary campaign afloat. He needs parity to stay in the race with Obama. Obama is in to win, but he’s also in this race to bring about real change in the White House. Let’s hope once Obama is elected that the rest of Washington will follow.

Posted by: ji_john | June 23, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

I agree with the writer of this article. Barack better watch out for his brand. If you’re selling “change” and “trustworthiness,” you better stick to selling those two things. Even he doesn’t believe in his own brand — he’s off now meeting with his corporate buddies in the Ethanol business, trying to figure out the best way to keep Ethanol made in South America out of this country, never mind that their sugar cane ethanol is better than that produced here by Barack’s Big League Ethanol manufacturers.

Posted by: Jane | June 23, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

As long as human nature remains the same all of this bull about ‘change’ will be just another bill of goods that is being sold along with the snake oil. Please!!!!! I have lived long enough to hear this ‘change’ nonsense several times in a lifetime and it turns out to be the same thing every time—bull!!!!!

Posted by: strangelove | June 23, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Another lie from Hussein. What else is new? I can’t believe that people fell for this idiot. We can only hope the real Obama will come out before the convention,and maybe they will see he is unelectable. I have had it with the Democratic Party. Left Wing Lunatics. And to think I was one for over thirty years. Not anymore. I hope Hillary runs as an independent.

Posted by: Anita Baker | June 23, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

When farting in the bathtub is outlawed, only outlaws will fart in the bathtub.

Posted by: barf simpson | June 23, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

obama is a lying sack!

Posted by: scott d | June 23, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Posted by: Zane | June 23, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

What do you expect from Matthew Dowd? This man was “chief strategist” for George W. Bush in 2004!!!
Thanks for ripping out our country, Matthew! Way to go!
Gimme a break…Ridiculous.

Posted by: Akinyele | June 23, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

The thing about the Obama brand that nags at me most is the single mother from Kansas bit. The media parrots this phrase daily. Yet I read a New York Times article months ago that listed among her accomplishments (if I remember correctly) a PhD in anthropology, some serious scholarship, and a cosmopolitan lifestyle. If she were alive today, what would she think of being stereotyped as a single mother from Kansas? I’m from Kansas. I can verify that the most typical response from someone who learns I’m from Kansas is something with “red shoes” and “yellow brick road” in it. There’s some sort of mythology about Kansas that makes it a never-never land for most people. Please understand, I’m not denigrating Kansas. I happen to love the vastness of the western Kansas prairies. I just don’t like the myths about Kansas. I’m not denigrating Mr. Obama’s mother. I think she must have been a truly exceptional person, from what little I know about her. My question is why was she stereotyped as a single mother from Kansas by the Obama campaign when she could have been represented in so many other, seemingly more accurate and honest, ways? How can I trust the Obama brand when it seems to me that he threw his mother under the bus even before he pitched his white grandmother under for being a racist, and then his pastors, and on and on. That’s not a good brand.

Posted by: kay | June 23, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

6 of one, half a dozen of the other.
So, he isn’t taking the public funds. But he is taking funds from the public, as opposed to special interests, or lobbyists. So, in theory, he shouldn’t be in anyone’s pocket. So, is McCain more ethical? I don’t think so.
Hey Redneck – why don’t you point out that Barak has the same first name as Ehud Barak’s last name? You think you have a stick, but its a pretty wimpy stick. I expect you will keep trying though. Get used to saying it, its going to be a long 4 years for ya. Just like its been a very long 8 years for anyone with a brain in this country.

Posted by: caterpiller | June 23, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Are you people out of your minds?!?!
If Obama had accepted that weak, paltry $84 million, I would have questioned his judgement and his ability to make wise decisions as President. In fact, he would have deserved to lose!

Posted by: Akinyele | June 23, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

The criticism of Senator Obama for choosing not to accept public financing in the general election is ill-founded and prejudicial. None of his ideals, goals, policies and objectives will be achieved unless he is, in fact, elected President. You may call it “expediency” but every candidate is in the race to win. Given the fact that Republican and conservative groups are going to use every dirty mud-slinging tactic they can muster, and most of that money will be unaccountable because it comes from private groups, Obama MUST have sufficient funds to overcome that onslaught. He made the right decision. Finally, as regards “flip-flops”, it is irrational and ludicrous to expect any policy maker to be inflexible and nbot respond to changing circumstances.

Posted by: john blanton | June 23, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Here’s the reality: The only voters that this might affect would be the swing voters, and they are either ignorent or will never know about it – because they have little interest to educate themselves. Those who care about this issue one way or the other, and write in OpEd’s, blog’s or comment have already made up their minds.
America, how’s it feel to have a small minority of an ignorant part-time electorate decide the outcome of the election?
Sad but true!

Posted by: soothsayer | June 23, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

That was very elitist, soothsayer….BUT I AGREE WITH YOU!!!

Posted by: Akinyele | June 23, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Of course, Obama is in the ethanol industry’s back pocket. Another hair brain knee jerk reaction by the democrats to a problem that blows up in their faces but starving people. Twenty years ago we could have started drilling in Anwar and we would have already tapped that oil by now and been less dependant on foreign oil. However, democrats know best. They would rather us increase our dependancy on foreign oil as we have over the last twenty years. Now they are continuing the nonsense of arguing that we still shouldn’t drill for KNOWN domestic oil because it won’t come online for several years. Nothing changes.

Posted by: strangelove | June 23, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I’m convinced that Obama and his campaign have decided that they can lie, deceive, distort, misrepresent, and flip-flop on major issues with impunity. I believe they think Obama’s empty message of change, charm, charisma and massive TV add campaign will more than counter the weak voices of those who expose his lies. For instance, Obama’s brand new general campaign add contains a blatant lie that he passed Public Law 110-181. He didn’t contribute to it, and didn’t vote on it.

Posted by: Occam | June 23, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Although I didn’t graduate from high school and I’m basically a toothless illiterate inbred, I still had enough sense to vote for Bush and will vote for McCain for president.

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 23, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

George Bush has been President of the United States for 8 years. He could have taken the lead on alternative energy. Instead, he refused to even acknowledge “climate change”. The Republicans have been president for 20 of the last 28 years. The blame gmae should be reserved for them.
“Nothing changes”…indeed

Posted by: Akinyele | June 23, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

How exactly does Dowd working for Bush mean that Obama didn’t break his promise on public financing? Don’t expect much in the way of head-to-head debating, despite Obama’s reputation as better-than-God when it comes to public speaking. Every time he says what his administration will do, McCain will simply respond with, “That is, if you can believe what he promises to you, my friends.” But then, who needs character in a president when he agrees with your policies? Just because you’ve spent 8 years complaining about EXACTLY THIS KIND OF DUPLICITY is no reason not support the next Democrat in line. Power is all that matters.

Posted by: Dave H | June 23, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

“enough sense to vote for Bush”….Now that is a contradiction!

Posted by: Akinyele | June 23, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

This is not complicated. He made the promise to stay within the system on four different occasions and then broke the promise. He is a new type of politician however, he doesn’t even wait to get into office before breaking his word.

Posted by: bedy | June 23, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

http://www.dontvoteobama.net/ – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – According to the state laws in Hawaii that were in effect at the time of Obama’s birth, a child must be born to “TWO” U.S. Citizen parents (this law was in effect from “December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986,“ which means it applies to Barack’s birth.But only Barack’s mom was a U.S. Citizen. Papa Obama was a citizen of Kenya. Right now today Barack is also a citizen of Kenya. Why does he keep his citizenship in Kenya? The US Constitution wants Presidents who are totally 100% committed to America. Obama is less than 100% committed to USA.

Posted by: DemocratForever | June 23, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

We’re tired of liars, deceivers and prevaricators in both parties. Obama gave his word and should have kept it.

Posted by: John | June 23, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Simply put, Mr. Obama is a Chicago politician.
On one hand, he is a canny, charismatic individual who is very persuasive on the stump. He can inspire many folks.
On the other hand, he is calculating. Claim that campaign finance reform is a key issue. Then, dump the system when it might be constraining.
Those contrary impulses will be determinative. If the calculating side emerges too much, Sen. McCain will likely — and deservedly — be the next President.

Posted by: Steve | June 23, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I can think of many things that might damage the Obama brand but forgoing public finance is not one of them. This is only an issue in the minds of beltway types and in particular right wing beltway types like Dowd who will do anything they can to prevent an Obama presidency. Basically electoral finance is riddled with loopholes and the public knows it. These loopholes are exploited by both left and right, usually a bit more effectively by the right because the business world which has the money tends to favor the Republicans. Now for the first time a Democratic presidential candidate appears to have more money than the Republican so of course they all start expressing shock and horror. Give it a break Dowd you’re as phony as a $3 bill.

Posted by: John | June 23, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Matthew, I totally agree with you. I actually wrote a blog on a related CNN news raising the same concerns. It’s very important for Obama to build trust and prove leadership by sticking to his words and plans. He is too new a brand to many Americans, who are still needed to be convinced on his characters and leadership ability. He is already winning, people back him, not because he can reach them thru email and the Internet, they back him because he has a winning plan and vision that reflect their fedup with the old politics. He does not want to be looked like one.

Posted by: Peter | June 23, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

McCain cannot win…and the sooner you McCain-ninites comes to grips with that, the easier these next 8 years will be.
Sad, so sad…

Posted by: Sad, so sad | June 23, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Obama lies about everything. the evidence is there. 1.5 million people donating $10 is $15 million. He will not talk about the other $235 million that buys his loyality to those who give him money. Obama wants to leave office rich. plain and simple. He is super ambitious. He justifies everything and anything when he says it is ok to break his promise because he wants to win. Principle mean nothing to BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY. In the preface to his 1970 book, A Black Theology of Liberation, Wright wrote: “There will be no peace in America until whites begin to hate their whiteness, asking from the depths of their being: ‘How can we become black?’”There is no use for a God who loves white oppressors the same as oppressed blacks. We have had too much of white love, the love that tells blacks to turn the other cheek and go the second mile. What we need is the divine love as expressed in black power, which is the power of blacks to destroy their oppressors, here and now, by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject God’s love.” [A Black Theology of Liberation, p. 70]If that last one isn’t HATE, I don’t know what is! Saying blacks should destroy their white oppressors by any means at their disposal. Ummm, that pretty much rings of a lynching request on the other side. Even the founder says Malcolm X was not far wrong in saying “Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.” No wonder Michelle is not proud to be american. What must his children think having heard Rev Wright all their young lives. Obama never said any of what Wright said was wrong. He sort of said he was against unspecified statements. But he never said what statements he disagreed with.

Posted by: DemocratForever | June 23, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Obama would have been crazy to accept public funding.
In fact, I’ve have serious doubts about him if he decided NOT to use the millions of dollars donated by the American public to fuel his campaign.

Posted by: Bama | June 23, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Are you people out of your delusional minds?!?!
If Obama had accepted that weak, paltry $84 million, I would have questioned his judgement and his ability to make wise decisions as President. In fact, he would have deserved to lose!

Posted by: Akinyele | June 23, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

DemocratForever, your time has passed. This is the America that is reaching back to live out the true promise of it’s creed. Your time is done and those like you will end up in the trashbin of history.
This is America. Love it or leave it!

Posted by: Akinyele | June 23, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Reading about the post turtle reminded me of another Texas saying appropriate to Obama, He’s all hat and no cow.

Posted by: Occam | June 23, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

“As a former Hillary supporter, I’m looking forward to voting for Obama because his plans for the US most resemble hers. She has endorsed him and so I’m going to make sure he gets my vote”
and you should know that as a former Hillary supporter, I’m looking forward to voting for John McCain! We don’t expect a perfect politician, but compared to Obama, John McCain is less dirty and he is not a flip flop politician!
Vote NO to Obama!

Posted by: Tina | June 23, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Can we drill yet? can we? can we?
The same crowd that thinks drilling in the Actic National Wildlife Refuge is a great idea, still thinks so.
Hopefully with enough Democrats, we’ll get an actual energy policy this time. Stuffed full of pork no doubt, but maybe it won’t be written in secret meetings with the VP. Maybe it will take into account (WHOA!) other kinds of fuels, new energy industries, states not named Texas, greenhouse gas emissions, and longer term planning.
Seriously if we had the ANWR oil now, we’d be shipping it to China and India to try and cash in on the $140/barrel. What we need is some plan that gets us there by investing in the next generation of infrastructure. Honda has a new hydrogen car, Denmark has a high percentage of electricity coming from wind.
What are we doing? THe next set of answers need to come from us, not Conoco, Exxon, and Halliburton.

Posted by: caterpiller | June 23, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

I give American voters more credit than going after a brand. Most of our votes are cast as an informed decision, not as a reaction to candidate marketing.

Posted by: kat | June 23, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

I DON’T TRUST THIS OBAMA GUY!!
HE IS SCARY!!! HE WILL DO ANYTHING TO GET ELECTED.
Supper delegates, please OPEN YOUR EYES!!!
Hillary 2008!!!!!

Posted by: very_mad | June 23, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

It does not matter how much money Obama collects…he still will not buy the WH! You have to remember too many Clinton supporters, Rebublicans, conservative, blue collar bible thumpers, so called racist, whites, Catholics, Jewish community will not vote for him because of his mouth and his associates….bottom line..McCain wins!! Better to vote for who you know than who you do not know! And who really knows Obama….He has several faces!

Posted by: michafaith | June 23, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

So, Obama lied. So what? Who really cares that matters? Certainly not the voters.

Posted by: Bill | June 23, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

The super delegates have already opened their eyes….However, there IS still a chance for the “supper” delgates.

Posted by: Time to eat! | June 23, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Obama broke his word. Period. Forgive me for tweaking an old RFK line, but…
I look at liars in public office and ask why.
Others dream of liars not yet elected, believe them and ask: why not?

Posted by: John Collorafi | June 23, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Energy. I’d suggest harnessing the wind from all the pols about pie-in-the-sky alternative sources they’ve talked about for decades, but it would only be countered by the pollution from all the smoke Obama’s blowing up our collective butts.

Posted by: Peter | June 23, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

That first comment is crazy in so many ways. ABC anti-Obama???? WTF? And Obama won’t have 300 million. He only got 22 last month. Do your math Jim.

Posted by: Ryan | June 23, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

A lying politician? That’s a novelty!

Posted by: Leo | June 23, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

I would be disappointed in Obama if he weren’t in it to win. Since when is winning a bad thing. I’m glad to see a democrat who will play tough for a change. He is learning from Kerry’s mistakes.
More people donate to Obama because more people want to see him elected…plain and simple. He would be a fool to not take advantage of that fact.

Posted by: wlw100 | June 23, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Mathew Dowd. I saw you last Sunday on This week with George Stephan…….. and I normally enjoy your comments but the way you went on about the flip flop and consequences was clearly partisan and siunded like you were whining. Since you are a republican you want the republicans to pick up on that and try to harp on it till the bitter end. I am a registered independent and I would like to see the next president who will be able to change with the times and circumstances and make the right decision for the nation and not hold rigidly to anything said in the past or something not cast in stone. I think what Obama has done is laudable, he has decided not to use tax payer funds (his contribution to lowering the deficit) and manage his presidential campaign as superbly as he managed his primary party nomination campaign, knowing his opposition cannot be trusted to keep their word and let dirty tricks seep through the loop holes. I think by refusing to accept Campaign public financing he has ensured his victory in November and if there are those like you who want to make the flip floping and the alleged lack of integrity as a big issue, then too bad sour grapes, he needs to outfox his competition and I hope he will do the same when he is the President and cleverly outfox the adversaries of the USA. So keep making a mountain out of a molehill thats your job. We the people don’t worry too much about the triviality of the partisan press when there are several burning issues that impact the nation’s future about which we care about much more.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | June 23, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Currently I pay 43% in federal + state tax. Under Obama’s announced tax plan, I’ll pay an extra 5% (Bush tax cuts expire), 5% due to unlimited FICA tax, and 5% extra due to new corporate taxes (small business co-owner, half my income is corporate). That will increase my federal + state tax burden to 58%. Add in property tax and it becomes 60%. Add in sales tax on the remainder (6% x 40% = 2.4%) and it becomes 62.4%.
Thus for every $100 I make, Obama’s government would allow me to keep $37.60. Is that a “fair share?” Personally I think this is ridiculous and approaches government slavery. Ironically, these are just the new taxes Obama brags about, not even counting his new capital gains tax and whatever other taxes he isn’t telling us about. Tell your children to quit law school or med school, unless they like being raped by politicians.
Don’t people like the idea that hard work, extra school, and sacrifice are keys to success?

Posted by: NoNewTaxes | June 23, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

This Obama is absolute poison. His arrogant, condescending demeanor is more than I can stomach. I cant believe that people are not seeing this empty suit for who he is. Lies, broken promises, racist church, radical left associates. Where is the new politics in that? Where is his sound judgment? And the coward wont even debate or participate in a townhall meeting after he said ” he would be happy to have a debate anytime, anywhere with John McCain ” People, please wake up, take a much harder look. There is already enough that he should have been out of this race months ago. This guy will throw you under the bus far faster than he did his pastor of 20 years.

Posted by: Badger1 | June 23, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

It’s amazing what people consider flip-flopping and what is considered a wise decision. It only makes since to opt out of public financing. Was he to “trust” the GOP and McCain to rein in the 527s. Give me a break! When can you trust any politician.
I am an independent who would have voted for the McCain of 2000 but today he caters too much to the conservatives b/c he believes they can deliver. He has flip-flopped more on his policy than Obama.
Personally, I uphold flip-flopping when it is a flip-flop for the betterment of the people/constituency which Obama did. McCain has flip-flopped for the worst.

Posted by: Southern Star (TN) | June 23, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

“I give American voters more credit than going after a brand. Most of our votes are cast as an informed decision, not as a reaction to candidate marketing”
What, are you KIDDING? Clinton had the best game plan. She not only catered to the stupid, but cultivated and groomed them! She created her own market!
(Ladies excepted, she had to win over a LOT of sectors besides you!)
Now Obama is reaping the rewards for their BOTH dumbing the whole process down. I’m starting to think they were a team all along.

Posted by: zeroKnots | June 23, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

DemocratForever <>
The law your speaking of was only law for twenty of the two hundred thirty two years this country has existed. Isn’t it a little desperate to look for arcane laws that are no longer on the books to disqualify a candidate. McCain wasn’t even born in the United States. Do you fear McCain is holding veiled loyalties to South America because he was born in Panama? For most of the nation’s history if you were born in Panama you couldn’t be President. So which is the more valid candidate? Let’s stop being silly and get on with real issues.

Posted by: Robin | June 23, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

it’s funny the republicans are upset about obamas money… even though the majority of it came from regular folks… he is going to CREAM mccain, with or without his bazillions of dollars of support

Posted by: earthisnotflat | June 23, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

it’s funny the republicans are upset about obamas money… even though the majority of it came from regular folks… he is going to CREAM mccain, with or without his bazillions of dollars of support

Posted by: earthisnotflat | June 23, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Nope have to diagree with you.
We dems understand perfectly why he has made the choices he has made.
ALL in our best interest.

Posted by: Dana | June 23, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

article does not even mention that mccain would have a gross advantage if obama did not go his own route. the hubub is that Obama is in control fiscally, something reserved for the other side in past elections.
if this was the other way around, which it usually is, this article would not have been written, would it?
come on matthew, I know you know whats behind your article, but the american people don’t. come on you can start anew again, and work back to humanity.

Posted by: evan thyme | June 23, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Yeah, who is Matr Dowd that we should pay attention to his finger shaking? Never, ever, changed your mind about anything, Matt??? Then you’re really not too bright, and you’ve lost all legitimacy. Every single thinking person changes their mind. EEEEEven President Bush. AND John McCain. Give it a rest – you can’t really find anything important to criticize Obama for. But you want to look smart. You don’t, though….

Posted by: kcareymac | June 23, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

McSame is just jealous because he can’t get people to back him like Obama can… thus he literally “must” opt into the public finance system.

Posted by: Chris | June 23, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

“The brand” was being formulated in Chicago during the time when Barrack was a commnity worker. He met Illonois Senator Emil Jones, who is now Presidnet of the Illonois Senate. Barrack reportably told Jone, ” you have the power to make US Senators.”
In watching the 2004 DNC “the brand” was further promoted.
An unknown state senator from Illinois gets picked to be the keynote speaker at the 2004 DNC Convention. It was that event, and that speech that launched Obama into the national limelight. He became billed as ” the Democratic Party’s rising star.”
Up until that time Obama wasn’t even a speck on the national media’s radar, but with a well orchestrated media event, that all changed, and the media became part of the Obama team.
What I saw when viewing the 2004 DNC Convention was a well orchestrated event. Every-time Obama would pause for applause, the camera’s would pan to the audience which showed a frenzied crowd, at the front of the stage, holding “Obama” signs. It was as if he was the 2004 nominee. He wasn’t but it seemed clear that he was being presented for a future time.
I also said to myself in watching the scene that Hillary was done 3 years ago and was up against a force that we are only now beginning to see because of the extended primary.
Upon reaching the Senate Obama went about recruiting some of the best “insiders” in the biz to further formulate the brand he would use when when he made his presidential bid.
Capitol insiders like controversial former Fannie Mae chief executive James Johnson, He hired Pete Rouse, a 30-year veteran of national politics and former chief of staff to Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle, as his chief of staff, and economist Karen Kornbluh, former deputy chief of staff to Secretary of the Treasury Robert Rubin, as his policy director.[49] He recruited Samantha Power, author on human rights and genocide, and former Clinton administration officials Anthony Lake and Susan Rice as foreign policy advisers.
Obama’s asscociations are well known, most of whom are now corpses on Obama’s success highway.
The ” brand” must be in jeopardy becaue Obama is gettign ready to “Re-Introduce” himself. Aparrenly he feels like we still don’t know who he is.
Lets hope that this time though we have a media that finally realizes that they don’t even know what they have been promoting. As Karl Rover so aptly put it, ” a campaign that’s personality-driven rather than idea-driven. ”
May now we will start to hear substance instead of rhetoric. And that alone will change the brand.

Posted by: anotherview | June 23, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

It doesn’t matter who wins. We’re screwed. The Democrats are want to give my money to people who don’t want to work, and the Republicans want to give my money to people who don’t need to work. I’d write more, but unfortunately, I have to go to work.

Posted by: RobertFromChicago | June 23, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

I have always believed in the idea of public financing; however, if you asked the American people whether Obama should take $80 million dollars in taxpayer money when there are small donors perfectly happy to give to his campaign willingly, they would say no. ESPECIALLY Republican voters and conservative independents of all people. The idea that the GOP is now advocating spending taxpayer money when private money is already willingly available is HILARIOUS, and is the real brand-damaging aspect to this story. The fact is that Obama’s small donor army is closer to true public financing than any system we have ever had in place, so if this was a choice of truth or tactics, Obama managed to do both; meanwhile, the GOP fumbles around telling Obama supporters not to give five or ten dollars, so that taxpayers, including McCain supporters and people who do not like Obama, can all chip in for his campaign.

Posted by: Shadow | June 23, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

we need more than 1/2 the story
you are setting the bar a bit high for mr. obama, and for what?
who are you comparing him to, surely not mccain?
Your solution, is to just siphon more money through committes like the Republicans, which is not loyal to the public financing law to begin with? Yes, Obama has the advantage and you don’t like it, but let’s be honest, directly or indirectly you helped create this discrepancy.

Posted by: evan thyme | June 23, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

It shows he is a big liar, and his change rhetoric is a bunch of crap. He is just another politician, that preys on the ignorance of the electorate. When the country pays attention, I believe they we will reconsider, and take a good look at this big phoney. They will see that this change, will be a change that will lead us down the Carter path. I am sure that Iran thinks he is a change that they can believe in, I know Hamas likes the change that socialist, coward will bring to the table.

Posted by: Frank | June 23, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

NoNewTaxes:
***Currently I pay 43% in federal + state tax. Under Obama’s announced tax plan, I’ll pay an extra 5% (Bush tax cuts expire), 5% due to unlimited FICA tax, and 5% extra due to new corporate taxes (small business co-owner, half my income is corporate). That will increase my federal + state tax burden to 58%. Add in property tax and it becomes 60%. Add in sales tax on the remainder (6% x 40% = 2.4%) and it becomes 62.4%.****
Under Obama’s plan you will be paying what you paid under Clinton. Your math is getting really silly. The FICA cap is only money paid over and above $102,000 and its a payroll tax. Only employed, self employed and business partners pay FICA. If your a businessman you would know that and wouldn’t make such a statement. Independent studies have been comparing McCain’s and Obama’s plans. You might try referencing some of these. As a businessmen worth his salt you should be making accurate calculations based on realistic monetary assessments not wild sky-is-falling ramblings. You should vote for the candidate that is looking out for your interests. If I was making a half million dollars a year I would vote for McCain. There is nothing wrong with that. People from there down to 250 grand will not be paying a whole lot more. The rest for the most part will be paying less taxes.
But no one is going to be paying $62 percent. If that’s what you think its a miracle you have stayed in business this long.

Posted by: Robin | June 23, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

you make change, if you don’t win. obama made the right decision. let the people judge president obama.

Posted by: shang | June 23, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Conservative NYT columnist David Brooks says Republicans are saps for thinking Obama is vapid and inexperienced – this is a glimpse at Obama’s ruthless Chicago pol style. But Brooks is also ambivalent watching all this, saying on the one hand, Obama did sell out for political advantage. On the other hand, global affairs ain’t beanbag. If we’re going to have a leader who has to negotiate the likes of Vladimir Putin, it’s a president who can be ruthless. Obama’s decision has revealed much – he’s not just Mr. Good Guy and he’s far from naïve or inexperienced in politics.

Posted by: idahogirl | June 23, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

we are a very large group of Hillary Clinton supporters! We will be protesting Obama-Hillary unity rally in New Hempshire this Friday!
OBAMA , GET READY, YOU WILL BE SHOCKED!
ATTENDING GROUPS ARE!
PUMA
HILLARY SUPPORTERS 4 MCCAIN
DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN
AMERICA COMES FIRST
DON’T VOTE OBAMA
CITIZENS FOR MCCAIN
REAGAN DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN
If anyone wishes to join us, you are very much welcome!

Posted by: PROTEST HILLARY AND OBAMAIN NH | June 23, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

we are a very large group of Hillary Clinton supporters! We will be protesting Obama-Hillary unity rally in New Hempshire this Friday!
OBAMA , GET READY, YOU WILL BE SHOCKED!
ATTENDING GROUPS ARE!
PUMA
HILLARY SUPPORTERS 4 MCCAIN
DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN
AMERICA COMES FIRST
DON’T VOTE OBAMA
CITIZENS FOR MCCAIN
REAGAN DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN
If anyone wishes to join us, you are very much welcome

Posted by: PROTEST HILLARY AND OBAMAIN NH | June 23, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Can you imagine Obama sitting across the table from Hamas? or from our boys in Iran? We’d chew him up and spit him out like lemon seeds. Yuck, what a horrible situation that would be. What a delightful drubbing Obama would get. But then, the name Obama is Arabic; the name Hussein is Arabic, as is the name Barack. But he’s a brother in name only–until he sells the USA out to us!

Posted by: Ahmadinejad | June 23, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

To all the libs on this site that want to forgive obama’s flip-flopping-the point of this article is that obama’s entire candidacy is based upon being a “new” kind of politician since he has no experience and has accoplished nothing of substance-so now he has damaged the only argument that made him a viable alternative.

Posted by: Tom | June 23, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

hey, Protest Hillary and Obama in NH!
I understnad your anger!
I was so much for Hillary and she had dissapointed me! But I think that she was forced to do this!
We must stand stroing and still should NOT vote for Obama!
I agree!
I will be going from MA to NH to join the protest this Friday!
I just received an email too

Posted by: Suzan | June 23, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

What do you expect from Matt Dowd? A former Republican mouhtpiece. John Kerry took public financing all the while the swift boat scum spread falsehoods. I donated money to Obama 08 to help counter the wave of attacks that are sure to come. ABC is so anti-Obama it is obvious to all

Posted by: nick | June 23, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Hey, Protest Hillary: I am a white, middle aged woman who never supported Hillary and have been supporting Obama since he announced.
I don’t care if you vote for McCain and wallow in self pity.
In fact, many are sick and tired of you guys who are only looking for attention and throwing a temper tantrum because you did not get your way.
Threaten, stay home, wallow and sulk.
I do not care.
I totally disagree with you, Matthew. You know very well that if he went with Public Financing you guys would all be tut tutting how naive and gullible the man is to give up all those small donors excited by his campaign and wanting to take part. The way I see it, he was going to be slammed either way so why not go with the money, run a truly national campaign and help those downticket hopefuls.
I can either give my money to public financing in which I would be helping a candidate I don’t want to help out or I can do it through the internet directly to the candidate I support. that is how I see this thing as well. i want my money going to Obama but, not McShame.
So, the pundit class can belly ache all they want. The fact is that the people don’t really care, Obama made the right choice and us small donors can help out our candidate and donate to him.

Posted by: vwcat | June 23, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Tom!
I am a liberal and I HATE Obama!
that is why since Hillary is out, so many democrats moved to McCain!
Do not believe those polls!
McCain is ahead because all those polls have 18% to 20% undecideds that means they are afraid of telling the truth! because they don’t want to be called racist!

Posted by: Sam | June 23, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

I will definitely protest the UNITY RALLY!
what a great idea!
I voted for Hillary but can not support Obama!
America comes first!
Hussein can NOT be my president!

Posted by: Jim, NH | June 23, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

It’s obvious throughout this election season, that Barack Obama makes heavy use of the media to deliver messages for him. While he was running against Hillary, everyone kept asking her to drop out. Then they insisted she concede to Obama. Now CNN is delivering a message asking Bill Clinton to endorse Obama. The CNN anchors are all aflutter pointing out that Bill Clinton has not endorsed Barack. Now I ask, who cares if Bill Clinton endorses Obama? Does anyone pay attention to him anymore? The tabloids care more about the spicier part of Bill Clinton’s behavior. Obviously, for some reason Obama needs people to totally cave to him. This hardball part of Barack’s personality that requires people to absolutely grovel to him is very distasteful. And isn’t it obvious that Bill Clinton shouldn’t endorse Obama unless he picks Hillary for VP? There’s no way I would ever unify and vote for Obama, but Clinton shouldn’t give an important endorsement when he still thinks his wife could be on the ticket.

Posted by: bettym47 | June 23, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Good for Matt Dowd, It’s about time somebody highlight Obamas absolute hypocricy. Good job Matt, Keep it up please, we need some kind of balance with all the pro-obama media covering for his gaffes, and washing his dirty diapers.

Posted by: Badger1 | June 23, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Did you ever think you would see the day when a Chicago rabble rouser who gives a good speech would be the nominee of a major political party for POTUS? I bet the green party candidate has more experience.

Posted by: Floyd | June 23, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

I am part of the protest!
DEMS4McCAIN 2008
HILLARY 2012
I guess Hillary set Obama up BIG TIME!
WAIT AND SEE THE BIG PROTEST IN NH!

Posted by: John | June 23, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Poor George Carlin died. Whose gonna make fun of these imbeciles that we elect?

Posted by: Bob | June 23, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Obama did–100 percent–the correct thing, opting out. It means funding from the whole republic, not just spec. interest whoring like usual. Time to take Washington DC back, and this was a GREAT step!!

Posted by: Oin08 | June 23, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Senator Kerry is out in the news today saying that McCain is confused which seems code for McCain is too old to be President. But if that’s so, could Obama just be young and dumb? Remember the debate where Tim Russert asked Hillary and Barack if they knew anything on the new Russian President? Hillary answered the question and then Barack just said basically what Hillary did. It was clear Barack had no idea who the new President of Russia was or he didn’t seem to know much. Does this mean Barack isn’t fit to be President?

Posted by: bettm47 | June 23, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Is it possible he is doing this to put money in down ticket races?
Rather than spend the money on TV ads for himself, in opting out, he can spend the money to get a congress with a filibuster majority on his side.

Posted by: LH | June 23, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Let’s also remember that John McCain, a true American hero, has two sons fighting for America who are also heroes. His father and grandfather were heroes and fought for America too in the US Navy! Where is Barack fighting? What country are Barack’s family members fighting for, KENYA??!!

Posted by: bettym47 | June 23, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

The poor Hillbots only have their little band of protesters who think the world revolves around them.
No one cares if you protest. Actually many wish you would just go and quit bellyaching and whining and stomping your collective foot.
It’s over. Deal with it and grow up.

Posted by: vwcat | June 23, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I am glad a lot of Hillary supporters will be protesting the unity rally in NH
McCain 2008
Hillary 2012
The official Hillary site is dead!
NObama bloggers invaded the site!
But before Hillary dropped out her supporters had developed many websites fand started blogging at those sites!That was part of her plan!
Hillary blogs have been sending messages to her supporters to protest the unity rally in NH anyways!
part of her plan!
So do not even follow what she says,
We all know what HILLARY wants!
McCain 2008
Hillary 2012

Posted by: Rose | June 23, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

The term flip flopper seems to be used a lot these days. Romney was called a flip flopper frequently in his debates with his fellow Republicans. Obama accused McCain that he flip flopped on drilling off shore. Then Obama announced that he was rejecting public campaign financing after he had promised to accept it, and he’s made a big deal recently of rejecting a gas tax holiday after voting for it when he was a member of the Illinois legislature. Of course, Obama doesn’t say that he’s a flip flopper. He shrewdly says that he tried these things and they didn’t work. So if that’s the case, why can’t McCain say that our energy policy isn’t working and we need other solutions, including the possibility of off shore drilling in places where it won’t hurt the environment? Isn’t what is good for the goose good for the gander, or is Obama just engaging in the same old negative politics that he promised he wouldn’t do? Hey! Isn’t that another Obama flip flop!? Please check out my blog at http://www.elections2008online.com. Thanks!

Posted by: bettym47 | June 23, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

AP writer Liz Sidoti states, “Barack Obama chose winning over his word.” And he has done it before many times, and will do it again, and again, and again. He didn’t even tell the truth in his fictional autobiography. He changes his mind on the issues more than he changes his ties. Except for this Matthew Dowd opinion piece, the media hasn’t addressed the BHO’s instability and credibility issues.

Posted by: Sally | June 23, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Hussein obama will be cooked right after Denver!

Posted by: Joan | June 23, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

What you fail to put into your artical:
From his response in a questionnaire from the Midwest Democracy Network, released Nov. 27, 2007, when asked: “If you are nominated for president in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?”
“Yes. I have been a longtime advocate for public financing of campaigns combined with free television and radio time as a way to reduce the influence of moneyed special interests. I introduced public financing legislation in the Illinois State Senate, and am the only 2008 candidate to have sponsored Senator Russ Feingold’s (D-Wis.) bill to reform the presidential public financing system. In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain, R-Ariz., has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”
The McCain and Obama lawyers meet and was unable to come to agreement.
We might also want to know the following as to John McCain:
McCain had initially applied for the money, however, and has been in a dispute with the Federal Election Commission over whether he needed its approval to decline the funds. The FEC insists that he does, but has not had a quorum to act because four of its six seats have been vacant pending Senate confirmation of presidential nominees. McCain lawyers have disputed the need for FEC approval.
The government’s top campaign finance regulator says John McCain can’t drop out of the primary election’s public financing system until he answers questions about a loan he obtained to kickstart his once faltering presidential campaign.

Posted by: army193 | June 23, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

And Hillary had to be destroyed by the MSM? For what? This clown.
I hope the media is happy now – delivering us a guy prancing around with his own presidential seal, lying about his achievements, drunk on ethanol.
Oh, that’s change. This Hillary supporter will not vote for Obama, ever.

Posted by: Martin | June 23, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

I can not stand Obama at all!
I definitely will vote for McCain!

Posted by: Ann | June 23, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

I wish I’d live in NH!
I’d love to be there and hold a DEMS4McCain sign!
I hope they come to my state , I swear i will go!

Posted by: Harry | June 23, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

I am hoping that the bots do vote for McShame. that way we can watch how much they throw their temper tantrums in November when they watch their candidate go down in flames to Obama – again!
And the fun thing will be due to their own incompetence. Hillary took a sure bet and so mismanaged her campaign and ran it so incompetently that she lost. And mcShame seems to be stumbling around out there confused.
I wonder how long they will hold their breath and wallow in self pity after that.

Posted by: vwcat | June 23, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Saudii Royal Al Saud family supports Obama! The same family picked our president G W bush! They have donated so much money to Obama campaign!
That is why Obama can not go against the oil companies, that is why Obama does not want gax tax holiday, that is why
YOU SHOULD NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA
McCain 2008!

Posted by: SAUDIISWANTOBAMA | June 23, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Out west–the cowboys use to ride for the “brand”. The doggies were roped and branded with the mark of their owner. Obama had no brand yet, Hillary already had the Clinton brand.

Posted by: tom22old | June 23, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Wow. How ill informed are you? Are you seriously saying that the Saudis side with Obama over McBush??? lol
That is rich.

Posted by: vwcat | June 23, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

I see you Obama haters are still up to the same old thing. Get over yourself! OBAMA 08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Emilianna | June 23, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Tom, that is one brand that should be held in shame. Clinton.
Conjures up images of pardons to the highest bidder, pilfering of the white house furniture, selling the Lincoln bedroom like it’s the motel 6, ect.
Some brand.

Posted by: vwcat | June 23, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Emilanna, they cannot get over themselves until they realize the world doesn’t revolve around them. They are throwing tantrums to get attention.
Like spoiled children.

Posted by: vwcat | June 23, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I know this is immature and whiny…. but I wish Obama would just go away.

Posted by: Cranky | June 23, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

vwcatt and emilianna – Just wondering why youre both supporting an exposed fraud, and a lying racist? Nobama, No way!!

Posted by: Badger1 | June 23, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Honestly, save me (and Barack) the lectures, Matthew. I think you know all-to-well how GOP 527 “Swift-boating” works and why this decision was necessary as a self-defense measure. Shame on YOU.

Posted by: Mark in GA | June 23, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Mark in GA – Will you quit it. The Dems and Move on.org have far more money than the repubs, and they are already using it, CREEPS, OBama is a proven liar, afraid to debate,and now a discriminator against Muslim women. What an absolute piece of ****.Obama backtracked on his word AGAIN, for greed, he is an obviously self absorbed assssshole.

Posted by: Badger1 | June 23, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Nobody put a gun to Obama’s head when he agreed in writing to take public financing. He gave his word; he broke his word. That is not self-defense; sorry.

Posted by: John Collorafi | June 23, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Obama: Truth or consequences? The truth is: your vote for Mr. Wonderful will have serious consequences. Yes, he is handsome, charismatic, eloquent (as long as he has his teleprompter), charming. Unfortunately, these are not qualities we necessarily need for POTUS. It’s what he is lacking that is important: experience, knowledge of the issues, social sensitivity, cultural awareness (“a typical white person”?). Charm will not end any international hostilities, especially when Barry has trouble thinking on his feet. And the terrorists are apparently more insightful than your average American voter. I find it very difficult to believe that this man has ascended to the level he has achieved already. Ever heard of the king’s new clothes? The rest of the world looks at us and concludes that our Presidential race is simply another episode of American Idol.

Posted by: Ropati | June 23, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Obama: Truth or consequences? The truth is: your vote for Mr. Wonderful will have serious consequences. Yes, he is handsome, charismatic, eloquent (as long as he has his teleprompter), charming. Unfortunately, these are not qualities we necessarily need for POTUS. It’s what he is lacking that is important: experience, knowledge of the issues, social sensitivity, cultural awareness (“a typical white person”?). Charm will not end any international hostilities, especially when Barry has trouble thinking on his feet. And the terrorists are apparently more insightful than your average American voter. I find it very difficult to believe that this man has ascended to the level he has achieved already. Ever heard of the king’s new clothes? The rest of the world looks at us and concludes that our Presidential race is simply another episode of American Idol.

Posted by: Ropati | June 23, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Sure Barack, ALL OF A SUDDEN the system is broken. LMFAO, It was the same sytem the day you made your promise, as it was the day you broke your promise. You are too blatently PATHETIC.

Posted by: Badger1 | June 23, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Give me a break. Anyone who believes anything BO says is NUTS!!! He talks out of both sides of his A– at the same time and idiots listen! WOW what a Country. I guess we should run an add every 4 years IDIOTS, CONMEN AND LIARS PLEASE APPLY FOR POTUS!!!!!

Posted by: politicgirl | June 23, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

What makes any of you think that Barack is a “different” kind of politician? Because he says he is? Don’t close your eyes to the obvious if he made a promise he didn’t keep that speaks loudly about his character. For twenty years his spiritual advisor was Rev. Wright, who I frankly trust more than Barack…Rev. Wright didn’t change his message,Barack did. Rev. Wright didn’t change his church when it was inconvenient and frowned on, Barack did.
Not because he stopped believing what Rev. Wright taught but because we wouldn’t vote for him if he stayed.
He wants to be elected so bad that he is willing to say and do anything to get the job done. And truth be told both Barack and Rev. Wright totally missed the boat on racial relations…for the first in US history there was a chance to actually talk openly about the issues…that Blacks/African Americans are as racist as whites…maybe justifiedly so, but racism in any form is wrong. America needs to have that conversation so we can all be proud of who we are and proud of our neighbors.

Posted by: Victoria | June 23, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

I’ve been critical of Obama mostly for his lack of experience and his fluffy rhetoric with nothing to back it up with and no details.
When Wright came along and he played dumb, I forgave him and thought ok, so he’s not perfect but he’s still relatively honest compared to most politicians. Then I saw more about how he won his seats in Chicago by getting others disqualified. Ok, shady and now I’m beginning to rethink how honest this guy is. But I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.
Now, going back on his and pretending that somehow the system became flawed over the last year???
Sorry Obama, your thirst for power has compromised your values. You are now nothing less than a typical politician with the thirst for power at all costs. You brought that view upon yourself, and many will now share it. You are no longer the reformed you self-styled yourself to be.
So now it’s time to run these campaigns based on policy difference, because I honestly don’t believe anything you say about your visions of the future of America – it’s all fluff and lies.

Posted by: JA | June 23, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

What I would like to know is the role the media played in getting a Republican candidate that Obama would be able to easily beat. Most polls showed Thompson, Romney and even Huckabee as better fits with the party standard. Instead the media set the agenda by picking and choosing whose events they would cover. The Thompson campaign pulled out all stops to get the media there, but instead they simply ignored him and label his as lazy. They similarly saddled Huckabee with this goofy Southern image and Romney as just another rich guy. If Obama loses, it won’t be because the media tripped him up, it will be his own bad choices. And frankly, he’s been pretty pumped up by the reactions in the primaries, let him throw his grandma under the bus or let another racist pastor emerge and he’s going to have to address some real issues.

Posted by: Ellen K | June 23, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

His Royal Arrogance, Barack Obama, Supreme King of Liberallviles, where laziness is rewarded and hard work is taxed.

Posted by: miyaki | June 23, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Dowd: Son, you’re being too cute even for a Republican. You’re mad because Obama figured out that you don’t bring a knife to a gun fight.
Besides, McCain tried to get out from public financing and the FEC called him on it. That means Obama made the right decision.
“It’s hard to get hit when your fist is in somebody’s face. James Carville

Posted by: JCinLa | June 23, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

BHO is a pandering political hack….nothing more. He has no brand….he has a false persona….he is a liar, cheat and a racist. He will never will a national election, never.

Posted by: John | June 23, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Hmmm Chiago politics go mainstream. All the way to the Casa Blanca.

Posted by: Rick | June 23, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Hmmm Chiago politics go mainstream. All the way to the Casa Blanca.

Posted by: Rick | June 23, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Hmmm Chiago politics go mainstream. All the way to the Casa Blanca.

Posted by: Rick | June 23, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Hmmm Chiago politics go mainstream. All the way to the Casa Blanca.

Posted by: Rick | June 23, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

I believe the main reason that Obama opted out of public financing is that he sees this election as a historic opportunity to change the electoral map. The people who are signing up to register in droves in very red states like Georgia mean that Obama’s coattails are going to be long enough to give him a congress to work with that is amenable to providing health care for all and to ending the Bush giveaways to the rich. Those $5 to $25 contributors of Obama’s will be an army of
campaign workers with an organization to guide them thanks to Howard Dean’s fifty state strategy. This was a very tough call for Obama – but that’s what good presidents have to do!

Posted by: dan f | June 23, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Two words that defines the brand of Barack Obama: “Alice Palmer.” The only thing Obama wants to change is his place in the Washington heirarchy. The only thing he hopes for is more power.

Posted by: Jack | June 23, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Obama is going to ruin the economy by raising taxes…as simple as that. I travel a lot for work around the world. The #1 issue threatening our society is our loss of competitiveness. The world is waking up and learning to live bypassing US of A. In this situation, reducing corporate taxes and stimulating growth (the main reason why India and Brazil are growing) and reducing personal incme tax, and reducing capital gains tax all will improve teh belief in US companies. What Obama suggests is downright dangerous to American business and economy

Posted by: kemprad | June 23, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Barack Obama’s brand? “Nowhere man.”
With respects to the Beatles:
“He’s a real nowhere Man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.
Doesn’t have a point of view,
Knows not where he’s going to . . .”

Posted by: CKA in Red State USA | June 23, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

What do people expect from Obama? He’s a niggger.

Posted by: Clinton2012 | June 23, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Obama’s flip-flop on this one is excellent political and strategic move for him. It proves he would be a smart negotiator in our behalf.
I would not vote for Obama if he caved in to public financing or chooses Hillary as VP. It would show that he would lose any advantage we may have over Iran or any other nation we need to negotiate with.

Posted by: Gillis | June 23, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

It’s very simple: A politician has a choice: On the one hand, he/she can be “Honest Abe” – or maybe George Washington and the cherry tree (who could not tell a lie). Or, on the other hand, the politician can be a liar who can’t be trusted.
I remember senators who campaigned on pledges to cut taxes who, after they won election, immediately voted for huge tax increases. (You can probably name some of these snakes too.) This type of lie has also ocurred on the national level as well.
I always remember these types of lies and I never trust that politician again. Neither should you.
You keep your word or you don’t.
You have integrity or you don’t.
You can be trusted or you can’t.
Once your credibility is gone, it is gone forever. Once you lie, you WILL lie again.
What other pledge will he break?

Posted by: Mary Oldsmobile | June 23, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Obama rejects public finance (something no-one has done for thirty years) and that proof that he DOESN’T stand for change??
McCain is the one stuck doing things the old way, sucking money from lobbyists while Obama gets more, and cleaner, money from the public.
This whole “Obama broke his promise” stuff sounds so very much like Republican sour grapes to me. You don’t think if McCain had raised as much that he wouldn’t do the same? Get real.

Posted by: JP | June 23, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Clinton2012: Real class act ain’t ya? Is it hard to type looking thru those little eye holes in the sheet?
Your soul is blacker than he is amigo.

Posted by: Peter | June 23, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Anyone voting for Barack Obama should understand they will be voting for MARXISM … We would have a MARXIST (Democratic) president and a Democratic Congress – how fast can you say “Fairness Doctrine?” Opposing opinions would no longer exist.
Obama the candidate seems like a nice guy but the REAL Barack Obama can be seen by his last 20 years – attending a church with the Rev. Wrong – a pastor who HATES America. Being involved with Rezko. Being associated with William Ayers, a man who blew up American government buildings and wishes he did more.
If this is what Americans want, so be it. But remember that change is NOT always “good.” Lenin brought change to Russia. Hitler brought change to Germany. Castro brought change to Cuba. Barack Obama – endorsed by Hamas. Endorsed by Rev. Louis Farrakhan.
NO’ Bama for me!!! I am a Hillary Clinton supporter. Ms. Clinton has to toe the party line but I don’t. I am voting for John McCain. This will teach the Democratic Party Machine that annointed Obama their savior before the first primary was even held that what they did was wrong. The men who write that us ladies will come around are FOOLS!
And don’t try to scare us women with “Roe vs Wade” being overturned … If Roe vs. Wade hasn’t been overturned with 8 years of Ronald Reagan followed by 4 years of Poppa Bush, I am not worried at all.
McCAIN IN ’08 says this Hillary supporter!!!

Posted by: Robin-Marlena | June 23, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

There were some people who agreed with the author through Sunday. On Monday morning we got up to the news that the same people who brought us swiftboat ads and the nasty pack of lies in the attack book against Kerry are also bringing us on August 4th an attack book aagainst Obama. It will be as they always are– a pack of lies, half truths and chopped up quotes, but they will have to be fought. I guess maybe Obama wasn’t being overly cautious after all was he? I’m very glad indeed that he preserved his ability to defend himself from the slimey people. The republicans did this junk for the last two elections and we got Dubya, torture, a war based on lies and a world that has no respect for us. I think America will be wiser this time. I don’t think I’m the only one who’s tired of being tricked and used.

Posted by: karela | June 23, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

I can’t believe all the “haters” in the US know how to use the comment box. I can see how they have the time.
In addition to supporting registration and get out the vote efforts in all 50 states, which takes substantially more money than the $84 million available from the $3 checkoff, this keeps all the 1.5 million donors, including me, actively involved. I, for one, would not have switched my giving to the DNC.
And yes Kerry was inappropriately skewered and Obama has to know that it takes more money to get the truth out. Lies seem to spread for free. Looking at many of these comments, “lies” is an understatement.
I like the thought that my president will intelligently “change” his mind rather than stick with public campaign financing and as a result not be my president.
It is time for the next generation to take up the mantle and Obama is the best candidate and will be the best president.

Posted by: Independent for Obama | June 23, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Obama=Bush

Posted by: Paul | June 23, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

The real reason for bypassing Federal funding for his general election bid is to have enough money and resources to fight off the smears of the mainstream (corporate) media since it looks like the Republicans are gonna be a little short on cash and their 527 swift boaters and attack dogs.////

Posted by: 08vote | June 23, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Oh, poor, poor, John Kerry! His poor service record, partially exposed (why did his awards have to be “re-awarded” again? The only possible reason: a less than honorable discharge…) and his Winter Soldier speeches used against him! Heaven forbid we use liberals’ own words to prove what they believe! I was wondering if this article was submitted for publication by the Obama campaign, since it seems the Press area on the Obama plane is part of the campaign!
Maybe one of you could define “hope and change” for me? It sounds a lot like “tastes great, less filling,” empty words from an empty suit going out to empty minds…

Posted by: Robert | June 23, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Spending big money didn’t seem that effective against Clinton. Why should it be any different against McCain?
You can’t buy elections.
Mr. Change once again did what was politically expedient versus what was right – not keeping his word concerning a promise he repeatedly made – and despite what the Obama-drones say, if he repeatedly breaks his word he’s just another politician.
If Barack turns out to be just another politician like McCain, then why don’t we just vote for McCain because at least he has the experience, though an old hand he may be…

Posted by: Andrew | June 23, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Despite your recognition that what Senator Obama choose a path that was not necessary and politically expedient, you continue to speak about him as if he is unique and what America needs. When will you and many others quick being expedient yourselves? He is extremely articulate and his presentation is excellent, but he has no new ideas, has not comported himself any differently than other politicos when he was confronted with clear choices, but you continue to say he is different. You are part of the problem because you have a skewed view of politics and lack real objectivity. Come down from Olympus and stop acting like your some kind political sage.

Posted by: Arnoldo Torres | June 23, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

I’m a big Obama supporter but I agree this move away from public campaign funding is a mistake; but I still won’t vote for another 4 years of a Republican administration!

Posted by: PeteB | June 23, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Baby, It’s too late…
I already fall in love with Obama, even though i feel very bitter about his flip flops… still it’s too late to change my feelings…
we, human beings are not as rational as we think…. when we decide for POTUS, we follow our feeling than our mind.
And Obama took already my heart!

Posted by: cloud123 | June 23, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Baby, It’s too late…
I already fall in love with Obama, even though i feel very bitter about his flip flops… still it’s too late to change my feelings…
we, human beings are not as rational as we think…. when we decide for POTUS, we follow our feeling than our mind.
And Obama took already my heart!

Posted by: cloud123 | June 23, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Well… does anyone seriously expect King Obama to keep his word on any of his campaign promises. He still remains the darling of the media and the DNC. He is going to be King of the United States.
Remember he is buying the Presidency.. Will he spend a total of 400 million or more to become PRESIDENT.
And if ANYONE believes that this money comes from the small donations of everyone… get a real pictures..
He will owe… those big time organizations that supported his campaign… how many will he favor if he is elected.
BEWARE THE BLACK WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING.

Posted by: Bob Miller | June 24, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Let’s talk about how McCain had tried to back out of public funding when he became the presumptive nominee back in February. FEC wouldn’t let him back out because he had already taken the money in November 2007. Also, not to mention McCain had already mismanaged his campaign funds.
Barack Obama told McCain he would entertain public funding IF they (RNC) could come to an agreement.

Posted by: Cathi | June 24, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Tell me, Mr. Dowd, did you actually believe the brand Sen. Obama has been selling? I would imagine being on your knees kissing his ring as the MSM has done from the begining would make clear vision difficult. He is a phoney and the press has been totally culpable in refusing to challenge him. The MSM attempted to mislead us all. Fortunately, there are those who can see the man for what he is and not what the MSM and he wanted to sell him as.

Posted by: Cieloblu | June 24, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Obama is a liar, cheat, crook etc.
The DNC are also horrible. I was a Dem but not anymore. Never ever will I give them another dime or ever vote for Obama. They have done this to themselves. I think the Dems deserve Obama right along with the media. The devil has taken them all over. I pray the Republicans will be strong enough to take them all down.

Posted by: Dean | June 24, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Give me a break about Matthew Dowd’s political persuasion; is he one of two conservatives from ABC? Gosh, your Democratic goggles are blinding!

Posted by: samantha98 | June 24, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Obama 80,000+ donations since ‘flip-flopping’ on public finance.
How could anyone compare the outrage at this current administration to the fact Obama is the one clearly funded by the public?

Posted by: Erica, WA | June 24, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

To me, a person’s actions says a lot more than their words. Obama won his state Senate seat by having all 4 Democratic candidates removed from the ballot. Two weeks before the end of his U.S. Senate race a messy marital scenario was exposed between his opponent and ex-wife. Timing is everything in life.
In the current primaries he spent a fortune “contributing” to delegates and super delegates, and organizing the small caucuses, which take big, big bucks to ensure control. So why isn’t everyone talking about what he’s most likely to do in the general election?
Already on MySpace and other youthful websites he, and/or his associates, are offering a $50 restaurant gift card for signing up with him. Let’s get real folks – he says he doesn’t want politics as usual, just like he said he’d run with public financing. The bottom line is Obama comes from Chicago and understands how to win at any cost – and the cost for buying enough votes is going to be way more than 80 million.
Keep your eye on the money and his prior acts Mr. Dowd. If I’m wrong I’ll apologize profusely in whatever way you choose – what will you write if I’m proven correct?

Posted by: MyComments4U | June 24, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

In fact, just because of this article I’m donating to Obama.
Due to our lame Congress I’m donating to ActBlue
Due to these lame Parties I will be joining the Progressive Party of Washington.
This of course, will have to come from the money I had set aside to renew my TIME magazine subscription.
I will get my news from the internet, HBO, Comedy Central, and sometimes Keith Olberman (and any other source that is within the realms of reality).
I will leave my TV on CSpan & CSPN2 so the watchers know I am watching them

Posted by: Erica, WA | June 24, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

I had an experience with Chicago politics – Chicago business politics – these people will do anything and I do mean anything to get what they want, there are no boundaries – lies are only the beginning, they will destroy people to get their way. The more I watch Obama, the more scared I become for our country – people need to wake up and do a little investgating, this is the United States presidency not American Idol – don’t be fooled. As a Lucent Technologies’ employee for 31 years handling Blue Cross & Blue Shield in Texas (all AT&T and Lucent products, I sold them) – I came up against the Lucent account team in Chicago (who had all been lost to Lucent’s competition for years) who decided they wanted to take over my account and took extreme measures including threatening me, inventing documents, lying on multiple levels including under oath. Do not be fooled – I was a top account executive my entire career, I have never came across people like these in all those years. The reason I know it goes further than just this Lucent account team located in Chicago, they involved the Chicago customer who was more than willing to be complicit in these illegal deeds and activities – including smearing and discrediting the Texas customer who was dying of cancer and who has since died. These people are ruthless, only out for themselves and will do anything to get what they want – I would not trust a Chicago politician for one second – every time I see or hear Obama, all I can think of is that his words and actions are very similar to all these other unscrupulous characters from Chicago – Obama has more than a few skeletons in his closet, just counting the ones we already know about – he scares me, and all of America should be scared.

Posted by: Sheilah Sabrah | June 24, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Sheilah Sabrah
You have got to be kidding.
You just described the Republican attack machine of which you must be a part of.
Obama is a politician yes…but no less than any of the rest…actually he is a ‘junior’ Senator. It’s the rest of them that have been suckling from the middle-class teet for too long.
Yes America should be scared…scared this fascist (i.e. corporately controlled) government never ends.

Posted by: Erica, WA | June 24, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

Sheilah Sabrah
That wouldn’t be the same AT&T that is one of the telecoms involved in FISA
Yes the telecoms have been dolling out money like candy to woo Congress into immunity. Not that our dear Media would ever cover that.
Contact your Senators! Contact Obama! The Constitution shapes our laws; not the telecoms and not terrorists!

Posted by: Erica, WA | June 24, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

Erica It’s people like you who scare me the most. Your attack is now transparent. Who in this country still thinks Congress makes decisions without lobbyists? Do you really believe we are so stupid we wouldn’t know the power of the telecom lobby? Even with the media closing their eyes the public will not be deceived by the likes of you. Mr. Dowd – follow the money, Obama spends it paying people like Erica to sit on your blog, divide our country, and spread lies.

Posted by: MyComments4U | June 24, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

Obama takes money from lobbyists and special interest groups just like other politicians. It is well documnented. USA Today listed thirty eight of them by name. I want to see how many people contribute to him now. People contributed to him during the primary to give him the money to beat Hillary. His supporters believe that he hjas the election won. I would really like to see if he can raise 500 million more dollars. I highly doubt it. How many opf his bloggers on here are busy writing checks for $2300 to him?

Posted by: Melanie | June 24, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

Matthew, you helped give us George W.
You don’t deserve a platform to pontificate from, you deserve a prison term.
Sit down and shut up!
And go the F away!

Posted by: motownmanc | June 24, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

Melanie – What if people like George Soros are pushing hundreds of millions to the black churches and elsewhere, who are then giving it to their congregants and others, who are then giving it to Obama? Mr. Dowd, follow the money.

Posted by: MyComments4U | June 24, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am

Obama is all brand. Once you look at the product? Stammering, incoherent, defective.

Posted by: Scungilli | June 24, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am

Listening to all you anti-obama “beings”, I cant help but pity America. The McCain apologists and sexist Hillary supporters should please open their eyes. McCain is a war-monger, simple and plain. Just like his twin Bush. Hillary fought hard. But she lost. There is always a loser and a winner in any contest. Why dont you guys just accept that Obama won, fair and square. Personal feelings, bigotry, racism and sexism, lets listen to their message. Let us vote with our heads and not our misinformed minds.

Posted by: De' Vyne | June 24, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am

I personally got no beef with McCain, I admire him a lot. And Hillary is MY HERO but I aint gonna start start any hate mail or stuff just cos i feel my person ought to win. Give them a chance. DO your own part by voting and let other people follow their conscience. I honestly HATE petty minded and sour fellows like that idiot clinton2012. Lets grow up.

Posted by: De' Vyne | June 24, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am

McCain wants to spend 80+ million dollars of taxpayer money on his political campaign. Money that won’t be available to reduce the debt, pay for schools, veterans benefits, fight terrorism, etc.
Obama is spending no tax money on his campaign.
It’s time to put the last nail in the coffin of the ridiculous idea of spending tax dollars for political campaigns!
If someone in this day and age can’t raise money from their supporters to finance their campaign, they aren’t serious candidates. The problem of big money from special interest donors has been solved with easy internet fundraising from the masses. Public campaign financing is an idea whose time has come and gone.
It isn’t breaking your word to simply change your mind! Recognizing circumstances have changed and casting aside an outdated solution is desireable behavior. Simply sticking with a bad idea because you once supported it is stubborn stupidity, not a virtue!
McCain has shown a tendency to stick with bad ideas (Iraq war), and abandon principled positions for political reasons (oppose Bush tax cuts, refer to Falwell as agent of intolerance, immigration reform). And how many flip-flops did McCain do on public financing of primary campaigns?

Posted by: jbcc54 | June 24, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

De’Vyne – That’s precisely the point. If Obama had won “fair and square” I wouldn’t have as much as a problem as I do. So let me reverse the table. When Obama was ahead in the popular vote and Hillary ahead in delegates Brazile said under no circumstances would the delegates decide against the popular vote. What changed?
When you disenfranchise voters, and say 30 people twisting arms have more power than 2.3 million people who went to the polls – I’m not thinking “fair and square at all.” I don’t think Hillary won, I don’t think Obama won. I think neither of them got enough pledged delegates to officially win and everyone keeps running around saying Obama won fair and square. It’s like a Kafka novel.
So if you want to think that votes don’t matter, that the rules don’t matter which clearly state if you don’t have the pledged delegates before the convention you don’t have a presumptive nominee, you go right ahead and keep your head in the sand.
But to me our democratic process has been severely subverted – and I would say the same if it were Hillary in Obama’s position. Right is right, fair is fair, rules are rules, and democracy should be the foundation of the Democratic Party.

Posted by: MyComments4U | June 24, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

I doubt that most Americans think much about the Bush administration’s choice of tactics over truth or even understand the difference. But they do understand $9 trillion deficit and a war with no end in sight.

Posted by: Gene Laskowski | June 24, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

WHY SHOULD THE USA VOTE A BLACK PERSON FOR PRESIDENT TO BEGIN WITH??? WE NEVER HAD ONE IN THERE YET. SO LETS SEE, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?? IT MEANS THAT THEY ARE WORTHLESS AND MEANINGLESS. THEY WILL DO NOTHING FOR OUR COUNTRY EXCEPT BRING MORE INTO THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE GOVERNMENT AND EVERYTHING. WE DONT NEED THEM IN THERE. THERE IS ENOUGH THAT THEY ARE RUINING NOW IN THIS WORLD. THE WHITE POPULATION IS GOING DOWN TO SHREADS, IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS THE WHITE POPULATION IS GOING TO BE NOTHING. BECAUSE THE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD BY THEN ARE GOING TO BE MIX BREEDS. PATHETIC ISNT IT. AND GUESS WHAT THE WHITE MAN WONT STAND UP TO THEM, BECAUSE THE BLACK MAN YELLS RACISM. BUT IT IS OKAY FOR THE BLACK TO DO ALL THIS SH*T TO THE WHITE AND NOTHING IS SUPPOSE TO BE SAID. WANNA KNOW WHY, BECAUSE THE BLACK WILL CALL IT RACISM. IF ANYONE IS RACIST IT IS THE BLACKS, NOT THE WHITES. WE JUST KNOW HOW AND WHAT THEY ARE ABOUT. AND THAT IS NOTHING BUT TROUBLE, ASSAULT, DRUGS, AND THEY ARE WORTHLESS HUMAN BEINGS. NOTHING GOOD TO BRING TO THIS WORLD AT ALL. THE AFRICANS OVER IN AFRICA DONT CONSIDER THE BLACKS OVER HERE IN THE USA AFRICAN AMERICANS, THE AFRICANS CALL THE BLACKS OVER HERE N*GGERS. THAT IS WHAT THE AFRICANS CONSIDER THEM. THE AFRICANS DONT EVEN LIKE THE BLACKS OVER HERE AT ALL BECAUSE OF HOW AND WHAT THEY ARE ALL ABOUT. SO, WHY VOTE FOR A BLACK PERSON TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT, THAT I WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND.
I KNOW ONE THING MY VOTE DID NOT GO TO OBAMA THE LOSER. IT WENT STRAIGHT TO HILLARY CLINTON AND ALWAYS WILL!!

Posted by: HRC | June 24, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

HILLARY IS THE BEST PERSON TO BECOME THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. SHE IS A WOMAN, SHE KNOWS WHAT SHE IS DOING, SHE IS FOR EACH PERSON IN AMERICA, SHE IS WILLING TO DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GO THAT EXTRA MILE TO HELP EACH PERSON IN AMERICA, WHAT MORE DO WE NEED.
OBAMA IS NOT THE BEST PERSON TO BECOME THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA. HE IS A LIER. HE IS BLACK, HE DOES NOT KNOW THE FIRST STEP TO TAKING CHARGE OF THE USA. HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN THE AMERICAN FLAG. HE DOES NOT WANT TO HURT HIS COUNTRY’S FEELING TO REPRESENT OUR FLAG. HE DOES NOT SPEAK THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, BECAUSE IT HAS GOD IN IT. HE DOES NOT EVEN BELIEVE IN THE LORD ABOVE. HE WILL NOT EVEN CROSS HIS HEART WHEN THE PLEDGE OF ALLIEGIANCE IS BEING SPOKE NOR WILL HE SAY IT ALONG WITH THE USA.
WHAT TYPE OF PERSON ARE YOU GUYS VOTING FOR TO REPRESENT THE USA?? WE DONT NEED A PERSON LIKE THIS TO REPRESENT OUR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. EVERYONE THAT IS VOTING FOR OBAMA DOES NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE GETTING EVERYBODY IN OUR COUNTRY INTO.
COLOR DOES HAS AN ISSUE IN THIS MATTER OF VOTING FOR THE RIGHT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE. LISTEN TO THE NEWS, RADIO’S, INTERNET BLOGS, INTERNET VIDEOS, AND WHATEVER ELSE SPEAKS/SHOWS TO US HOW AND WHAT BLACK PEOPLE ARE ALL ABOUT. I DONT HAVE TO POST IT ON HERE EVERYBODY KNOWS FROM HEARING AND SEEING IT ON THE NEWS EACH AND EVERY DAY AND NIGHT, WETHER IT BE THE NEWS, THEY ARE EXPERIENCING THE BLACK CULTURE PERSONALLY THERESELVES. WE NEED TO STAND UP FOR OUR COUNTRY AND VOTE FOR THE WHITE. WE MIGHT OF BROUGHT THEM THINGS OVER HERE TO OUR COUNTRY (WHICH WAS THE WORST MISTAKE THAT THE WHITE PEOPLE HAVE DID IN THEIR ENTIRE LIVES AND WE ARE SERIOUSLY REGRETTING IT NOW) BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE HAVE TO VOTE FOR THEM TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA. THE BLACKS THAT LIVE IN OUR USA DONT EVEN LIKE OUR COUNTRY AT ALL. I HEART THAT ON THE RADIO THE OTHER DAY A BLACK MAN STATED THAT FROM ALL THE BLACKS THAT THEY DO NOT LIKE AND BELIEVE IN THE USA AT ALL THAT THEY HATE IT.
AND THAT IS THE COLOR AND THE RESPECT THAT ALL YOU OBAMA SUPPORTERS VOTED FOR TO BECOME THE NEXT PRESIDENT. YOU ALL WILL SEE WHAT TYPE OF SUPPORT AND HOW THE USA WILL BE AND BECOME ONCE HE IS ELECTED THE NEW PRESIDENT.
YOU OBAMA SUPPORTERS YOU ALL CAN KISS MY A**. YOU ALL ARE DISGUSTING ILL NATURED INDIVIDUALS FOR VOTING FOR BARACK OBAMA .
YOU ALL WILL SEE AND ALL OF YOU WILL REGRET WHAT YOU ALL DID BY HAVING HIM FOR THE PRESIDENT OF OUR USA.

Posted by: WHITE POWER | June 24, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

IF WE DONT SEE IT ON THE TELEVISION, THERE ARE WHITE PEOPLE OF THE USA THAT IS BEING BEAT ON, ADULTS AND CHILDREN BEING RAPED, BURGLARY’S, ROBBERIES, MUGGINGS, PURSE SNATCHINGS, KILLINGS, THEY KILL THEIR OWN KIND, DRUG SMUGGLING, DRUG DEALINGS, THE BLACKS ARE DOING THIS ALL THERESELVES, IF ANYTHING THEY STARTED IT AND THEN THEY GOT THE WHITE PEOPLE THAT HANG WITH THE BLACKS INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED STUFF. IF THE BLACKS DIDNT BRING IT THE WHITES WOULD NEVER OF INCLUDED THEIRSELVES IN IT. THE WHITES WERE SHOWN THIS ILL MANNERED BEHAVIOR BY THE BLACKS. WE DONT NEED TO FOLLOW IN THEIR FOOTSTEPS, WE THE WHITE NEED TO LEAD NOT FOLLOW. WE DONT NEED TO FOLLOW FROM A BLACK PRESIDENT REPRESENTING OUR COUNTRY. ALSO, THE BLACK PERSON IS WHAT BROUGHT AIDS TO OUR COUNTRY, A BLACK MAN WENT ACROSS THE COUNTRY TO AFRICA AND HAD SEX WITH A AIDS INFECTED MONKEY AND BROUGHT IT BACK TO THE USA AND HAD UNPROTECTED SEX WITH A BUNCH OF FEMALE INDIVIDUALS AND THAT IS HOW AIDS WAS BROUGHT ABOUT TO OUR COUNTRY. THEY ARE SICK, DISGUSTING, DISCRIMINATING INDIVIDUALS THAT NEED TO GO AWAY, FAR, FAR, FAR, AWAY.
NEED I SAY MORE.

Posted by: HH | June 24, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

HILLARY IS THE BEST PERSON TO BECOME THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. SHE IS A WOMAN, SHE KNOWS WHAT SHE IS DOING, SHE IS FOR EACH PERSON IN AMERICA, SHE IS WILLING TO DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GO THAT EXTRA MILE TO HELP EACH PERSON IN AMERICA, WHAT MORE DO WE NEED.
OBAMA IS NOT THE BEST PERSON TO BECOME THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA. HE IS A LIER. HE IS BLACK, HE DOES NOT KNOW THE FIRST STEP TO TAKING CHARGE OF THE USA. HE DOES NOT BELIEVE IN THE AMERICAN FLAG. HE DOES NOT WANT TO HURT HIS COUNTRY’S FEELING TO REPRESENT OUR FLAG. HE DOES NOT SPEAK THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, BECAUSE IT HAS GOD IN IT. HE DOES NOT EVEN BELIEVE IN THE LORD ABOVE. HE WILL NOT EVEN CROSS HIS HEART WHEN THE PLEDGE OF ALLIEGIANCE IS BEING SPOKE NOR WILL HE SAY IT ALONG WITH THE USA.
WHAT TYPE OF PERSON ARE YOU GUYS VOTING FOR TO REPRESENT THE USA?? WE DONT NEED A PERSON LIKE THIS TO REPRESENT OUR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. EVERYONE THAT IS VOTING FOR OBAMA DOES NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE GETTING EVERYBODY IN OUR COUNTRY INTO.
COLOR DOES HAS AN ISSUE IN THIS MATTER OF VOTING FOR THE RIGHT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE. LISTEN TO THE NEWS, RADIO’S, INTERNET BLOGS, INTERNET VIDEOS, AND WHATEVER ELSE SPEAKS/SHOWS TO US HOW AND WHAT BLACK PEOPLE ARE ALL ABOUT. I DONT HAVE TO POST IT ON HERE EVERYBODY KNOWS FROM HEARING AND SEEING IT ON THE NEWS EACH AND EVERY DAY AND NIGHT, WETHER IT BE THE NEWS THEY ARE EXPERIENCING THE BLACK CULTURE PERSONALLY THERESELVES. WE NEED TO STAND UP FOR OUR COUNTRY AND VOTE FOR THE WHITE. WE MIGHT OF BROUGHT THEM THINGS OVER HERE TO OUR COUNTRY (WHICH WAS THE WORST MISTAKE THAT THE WHITE PEOPLE HAVE DID IN THEIR ENTIRE LIVES AND WE ARE SERIOUSLY REGRETTING IT NOW) BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE HAVE TO VOTE FOR THEM TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA.

Posted by: HILLARY YOU GO GIRL | June 24, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

WHO CAN BE A PRESIDENT OF THE USA THAT CANT PUT THERE HAND ACROSS THERE HEART AND SAY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BECAUSE IT HAS ONE NATION UNDER GOD IN IT. WHO CAN REPRESENT THE USA IF THEY CANT STAND BEHIND OUR FLAG BECAUSE IT MIGHT OFFEND SOMEONE OUTSIDE OF THE USA?? HE DOESNT EVEN BELIEVE IN GOD. IF THERE IS STUFF LIKE THIS THAT HE CANT STAND BEHIND THEN HE SHOULD NOT BECOME THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA THEN. THE ONLY REASON I CAN COME UP WITH IS THAT IF HE BECOMES THE PRESIDENT A LOT OF CHANGES WILL BE MADE FOR THE WORSE FOR THE USA. I SURELY WOULD NOT VOTE FOR SOMEONE LIKE OBAMA.
HILLARY ALL THE WAY!!!

Posted by: WP | June 24, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

i love mr. rogers neighborhood!!!!!!
do you??????

Posted by: mr rogers fan | June 24, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

i am bored at school is there anybody out there to talk to????

Posted by: mr rogers fan | June 24, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Why is that everyone forgets the qualifying sentence he made after he said he would accept public financing????? I think all Journalist should learn to read all the coments before they start to editorialzing what the individual says.

Posted by: Lionel | June 24, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

How come no one ever mentions Sidoti’s feeding McCiain donuts (his favorite kind!) at the annual press club meeting, making her not exactly the most unbiased of people on the presidential campaign, and no one ever ever points out McCain’s own campaign finance shenanigans.

Posted by: Omaya | June 24, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Erica. Your “dear media” is the reason you know about this in the first place. I’ve read about it in the NYT and WaPo continuously. Get over it.

Posted by: Whatevs | June 24, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Greed, arrogance and his associations with criminal muslims, racists preachers and terrorists. Respectable people will see this later in the election. The democrats pulled a real goof by having an affirmative action nominee.

Posted by: Harold in Tampa | June 24, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Obama makes me very proud to be a republican. :)

Posted by: James B | June 24, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

The idea of renaming the White House to the Black House is wrong. The idea of building a basketball court in the White/Black House is just as bad. What has our country become?

Posted by: Alice James | June 24, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

I don’t much care for what Bush has done to this country but he is in office because people voted for him. Of course they will not admit to it now. When Obama fails miserably the same people who voted for Bush then and voted for Obama now will not amit to that either.

Posted by: rab5700 | June 24, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Lies..huh
I’m sorry I forgot Hillary Clinton was only ‘mistaken’ about being under sniper fire in Bosnia.
She was only ‘mistaken’ that every vote should count except of course the ones that went for Obama.
Over 300,000 people voted in WA dem primary and it awarded 0 delegates (55% for Obama)
300,000 people voted in Puerto Rico and they got 55 delegates
Obama DID play by the rules…it was Clinton who continued to reinterpret them, and is exactly why she lost my support.
People of all colors have bled for this country…fought for liberties they themselves did not enjoy…Grow the f**k up.

Posted by: Erica, WA | June 24, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

104,000 donations since Obama ‘flip-flopped’ on public finance.

Posted by: Erica, WA | June 24, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Erica
It is smart a$$ statements by people like who that convince me not to vote for Obama. I can do without your hatred. I choose to NOT be a member of such hatred group. Obama and his Black Liberation Theology of Hatred for white people is unacceptable for an American President. Period. End of discussion.

Posted by: DemocratNoMore | June 24, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/w/warren_buffett.html
It’s better to hang out with people better than you. Pick out associates whose behavior is better than yours and you’ll drift in that direction.
Warren Buffett
Obama never followed the advice. He seems to always want to justify hanging out with the lowest of the low crowd of American haters.
http://www.dontvoteobama.net/

Posted by: DemocratNoMore | June 24, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Matthew Dowd, a GOP shill for BUSH JR. and clearly a right-wing liar, is called by ABC NEWS a MAN IN THE MIDDLE. WHAT A JOKE! Why don’t you folks at ABC NEWS ask John McCain why he won’t sign the paperwork to release his military records, as JOHN KERRY DID IN 2004! WHAT IS MCCAIN TRYING TO HIDE???

Posted by: Bill | June 24, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Rezko’s trial has lifted the veil on Illinois’s infernally corrupt political establishment, and a government witness named Stuart Levine has taken on the role of a meth-snorting, double-dealing Virgil, guiding the public through it. Levine, a drug addict and crooked GOP operative, is testifying for the government in order to avoid spending the rest of his life in prison. Over the course of seven days of direct examination by the prosecution, he described a statewide network of fraud, extortion, and bribery that included key figures in the administration of Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, a Democrat.
One of those figures was Tony Rezko, a top fundraiser for and adviser to Blagojevich.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_8_60/ai_n25474330

Posted by: DemocratNoMore | June 24, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Obama is just as bad as any politician. I don’t like either of my choices in this election. If Obama gets elected, he will change everything that we hold near and dear, and I don’t even own a gun. He will change the name of the White House and then put in a basketball court at our expense so that he and his rich buddies can play hoops on our time. McCain will do well if he lives through his first term.

Posted by: KC+1971 | June 24, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Democrat no more
Obama is half white! He was raised by WHITE people. I’m sure he has it in for us.
It is I who choose to not be a member of YOUR hatred group.

Posted by: Erica, WA | June 24, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Think about this.
You’ve had a president that lied, evaded reporters, ignored laws, told different versions of same said lie, thought he should never be questioned and didn’t listen to the people, blamed others… and Bush doesn’t have a thing on Obama, he’s a helluva lot worse. I have a feeling he’s not going for protests either or the media saying anything negative (look how the archives of the Sun Times/Tribune/Plain Dealer and others are being scrubbed of articles), many pols on the dem side in Chicago were told to clam up, Alice Palmer finally took a chance and came out with Hillary late in the campaign… took a big chance. I suggest everyone check his history in Illinois… it’s not pretty at all; That and hearing him constantly go opposite of what he wrote in his books, what he said the day before, lying on his record, blaming the staff and having them answer questions he should answer when he messes up or is caught lying. When I watched three programs with him giving three different answers on Wright in one night… then the big speech (where the original question wasn’t addressed, just race), when he stood there bold faced and said he did hear those things… blew me away. Not to mention how he treated the grandmother that raised him but was supposedly racist. Everyone acted like it never happened, best since King… and he couldn’t wait to sell the DVD on his site as patriotic and something to bring races together. I don’t know if he read the CAIR book on the history of the US, but it’s not the fifties.
I beg everyone to do their research… and there I was worried about him being like Reagan. His Exelon lobbying, lawyers, banks, telecomm as he expected us to believe all those daily record setting millions we heard on TV came from us oppressed little people.
That doesn’t count every scondrel around him either. You don’t want combine. Trust me.

Posted by: biggie | June 24, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Erica/ WC. By far, yo have been the most mature person this site. As for HH, HRC,Alice James and WHite power, I can only hope they grow up sometime this century. What the heck were they blubbering about. You guys have the guts to blame the african-americans for crime and other sh..t but the GLORIOUS whites were not begged to go down to Africa, tear them away from their families, brand them, force them to work as slaves, rape their women, mutilate and kill their men, and still call the Black man animals. That is ironic, isnt it. Even in this day an age, an average black man has to work twice as hard to get what a white man would get without breaking a sweat. Barack Obama surmounted obstacles to get to his present state. Yet he is just criticised for nothing. Hillary whom you guys are idolising got there on the strenght of her husband.I am sure if Obama werent in the picture, you next gripe would have been that what does a woman know about running a country. What do you really want. I thought America was the Land of the free. How long will people like you continue judging people on thier sexes and colour.Please, grow up.

Posted by: De' Vyne | June 25, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A BLACK PRESIDENT BEFORE SO THERE MUST BE A REASON FOR THAT. SO LETS NOT START IT UP NOW. BECAUSE ONCE ONE GETS IN THERE, THEY WILL BE COMING OUT OF THE WOODWORKS INTO THE CONGRESS AND ETC AND GUESS WHAT. OUR CONGRESS AND OUR USA WILL BE DOWNHILL FROM THERE.
ALL YOU OBAMA BELIEVERS WILL SEE WHEN HE MIGHT BE ELECTED PRESIDENT FOR 2008, AND GUESS WHAT I CAN SIT BACK AND TELL EACH ONE OF YOU ON HERE. “I TOLD YOU SO”, WHEN YOU ALL WISH THEN THAT YOU HAVE NOT ELECTED A BLACK MAN FOR PRESIDENT. I WISH THAT I HAD NEVER CASTED THAT VOTE FOR OBAMA. YOU ALL WILL SEE WHEN IT IS WAY TOO LATE. YOU OBAMA VOTERS WILL HAVE TO REAP WHAT YOU HAVE SEWN. AND ALL THE NON SUPPORTERS WILL HAVE TO SUFFER FROM IT.
PATHETIC, VERY PATHETIC.
I PITY ALL THE FOOLS THAT VOTED FOR OBAMA.

Posted by: white power | July 2, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A BLACK PRESIDENT BEFORE SO THERE MUST BE A REASON FOR THAT. SO LETS NOT START IT UP NOW. BECAUSE ONCE ONE GETS IN THERE, THEY WILL BE COMING OUT OF THE WOODWORKS INTO THE CONGRESS AND ETC AND GUESS WHAT. OUR CONGRESS AND OUR USA WILL BE DOWNHILL FROM THERE.
ALL YOU OBAMA BELIEVERS WILL SEE WHEN HE MIGHT BE ELECTED PRESIDENT FOR 2008, AND GUESS WHAT I CAN SIT BACK AND TELL EACH ONE OF YOU ON HERE. “I TOLD YOU SO”, WHEN YOU ALL WISH THEN THAT YOU HAVE NOT ELECTED A BLACK MAN FOR PRESIDENT, ALSO YOU WILL BE SAYING I WISH THAT I HAD NEVER CASTED THAT VOTE FOR OBAMA. YOU ALL WILL SEE WHEN IT IS WAY TOO LATE. YOU OBAMA VOTERS WILL HAVE TO REAP WHAT YOU HAVE SEWN. AND ALL THE NON SUPPORTERS WILL HAVE TO SUFFER FROM IT.
PATHETIC, VERY PATHETIC.
I PITY ALL THE FOOLS THAT VOTED FOR OBAMA.
I AM SO GLAD THAT I CASTED MY VOTE FOR HILLARY.
“HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON ALL THE WAY”

Posted by: white power | July 2, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

As a former Hillary supporter, I’m looking forward to voting for Obama because his plans for the US most resemble hers. She has endorsed him and so I’m going to make sure he gets my vote. McCain’s policies go against everything Hillary was promoting, and there’s no way in good conscience I could ever vote for McCain.
That said, I’m fed up with the media. I’m sick of op/ed pieces scolding Obama about campaign financing while completely ignoring the laws McCain has broken – he even broke a law he wrote (McCain/Feingold)! The author of this article makes his point clear – he would shake his skinny little finger at Obama but he has no opinion about McCain breaking campaign finance laws. By not explaining this issue in full, the media and people like Matthew Dowd, are lying by omission.

Posted by: MEGA | July 8, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

why is we Americans dont like somthing good 4 the sake of our future children,,and that is why we voted this holigan to the white house,,,that make,we the worker to lose our hope and houses,,,and even our cars.
speak the truth and the truth shall set you free.
VOTE 4 OBAMA 4 CHANGE
OR U KEEP ON BEGING

Posted by: MEGA | July 8, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

why is we Americans dont like somthing good 4 the sake of our future children,,and that is why we voted this holigan to the white house,,,that make,we the worker to lose our hope and houses,,,and even our cars.
speak the truth and the truth shall set you free.
VOTE 4 OBAMA 4 CHANGE
OR U KEEP ON BEGING

Posted by: MEGA | July 8, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Erica, WA. the problem of many youth today is that they can be so gullible. You mentioned you changed your mind about Hillary because she misstated her sniper fire story in Bosnia, which was years ago. I know folks who were refugees here from Bosnia and they told me they wouldn’t go back because it wasn’t safe. So it seems then that Obama gets a free ride and your vote although he misstated that ethnic cleansing is a positive thing, and told us he has campaigned in most all of our 57 US states, or it is ok that he blatantly published lies about both his and his opponent’s support of NAFTA trade and then given a chance to correct the record- he didn’t. His supporters must be willing to overlook that he campaigned for his moslem cousin in Kenya, yet then he failed to denounce the violence including burning Christians in churches that came after election disputes arose. Other presidential candidates spoke out against the violence and suggest intervention, why not Obama? The problem with Obama is that he voted ‘present’ on many votes, he gives a ‘canned speech written by others, and that he and his followers are not clear on what his platform is. We do know that he was the most liberal Senator in the short two years in office, which is too little experience to fulfill the qualifications for president. He is too indecisive and too conflicted about his own positions.

Posted by: Chaz | July 8, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

He’s just a LIAR.
“FLUSH! gurgle gurgle”
I mean what’s the value of a Democracy when a candidate can say any lie they want just to get elected? CHARACTER matters, if you can’t trust what they say TO get elected, what’s the point of electing them in the first place? How’re you gonna know what you’re gonna get?
Just one of many lies. He’s a sociopathic liar actually, doesn’t phase him one iota.

Posted by: tminu | July 8, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

See, Obama’s corrupt, he’s got people on the inside. He openly displays a quasi-presidential seal (ILLEGAL) what happens? Nothing. He’s now openly running a RAFFLE for the chance to see him backstage at the acceptance speech, without a permit or gambling license (ILLEGAL) what will happen? Well, I’ve reported him to the Federal Election Commission and the Illinois Gaming Board. They’re probably dirty too. Obama’s just a dirty lying politician. http://www.gambling-law-us.com/State-Laws/Illinois/

Posted by: tminu | July 8, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

I LOVE MISTER ROGERS NEIGHBORHOOD!!!

Posted by: MR. ROGERS FAN | July 10, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

What is his brand… “…something that involves truth and inspiration”?
The guy is a flat out liar, how can you say his brand involves the truth. He lies nearly every time he speaks extemporaneously (for you Libs: without a script).
His latest mega-gaff was telling us about the (his) Senate Banking committee’s recent activities, calling it “my committee”.
Say what?
That’s why his handlers are terrified every time he opens his mouth and he’s not reading from a teleprompter. Anything is liable to come out, and often it’s not the truth.
That’s okay though. This will become apparent when the debates start between Obama and McCain, assuming Obama’s handlers allow it.
Good luck with all of that.

Posted by: Jeff Roe | July 27, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Barack Obama recently finished a $500,000 total overhaul of his 757. And as part of the new design, he decided to remove the American flag from the tail…
What American running for President of the United States would remove the symbol of his country? And worse, he replaced the flag with it with a symbol of himself…

Posted by: WP | August 4, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Dear sir:Every mixcan should run out of califoria.After all they lack balls take back thier county?Why is that.So why should give them anything?They the most worthless people on earth. Dave Kogler

Posted by: Dave Kogler | October 21, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

This is a very fascinating piece. Brand is a very powerful thing when used wisely and properly. In school we learned all about how branding works together with channel management to bring in potential clients. Obama’s clients are the American people, any by betraying his brand he’s alienating his clients, to some degree.

Posted by: Channel Management | May 26, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.